International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 07 No. 02 April’23 162 Original Article Bacterial IsolateProfile in Gram-Negative Urinary Isolates: Role ofNitrofurantoin Meghna Sharma1, Sapna Soneja2, Loveena Oberoi3, Anuradha Malhotra2, Kamaldeep Singh4, Babica Mahindroo4 Abstract Background: In current times epidemic drug resistance has renewed interest in drugs belonging to the yesteryears, most importantly Nitrofurantoin for urinary tract infections. Studies have reported that more than 90% of urinary tract infections are due to enteric Gram-negative organisms, of which more than 80% are E.coli.Objectives: To study bacterial profile in Gram-negative urinary isolates and evaluate the role of nitrofurantoin. Methods:We retrospectively evaluated 500 consecutive Gram-negative bacterial isolates for bacteriological profile and nitrofurantoin sensitivity of patients of urinary tract infections at a tertiary care facility in Indiabetween January and June of 2022. Results:We had a total of 500 Gram- negative urinary isolates. 383 (76.6%) of these were found to be susceptible to nitrofurantoin. E. coli alone constituted 343 (68.6%) of total 500 Gram- negative isolates, 264 (76.96%) of which were sensitive to nitrofurantoin. 20 (4%) Proteus and 05 (1%) Citrobacter species were isolated and found to be resistant to nitrofurantoin. 12 (80%) out of the 15 Acinetobacter isolates were resistant to nitrofurantoin. All 12 (100 %) Pseudomonas isolates tested resistant to nitrofurantoin. Conclusion:E. coli is the most common of uropathogens and despite rise in antibiotic resistance, it continues to be sensitive to nitrofurantoin. Resistance to nitrofurantoin is also being reported and this calls for judicious further use of this drug based on culture reports and local prevalence data. Keywords: Nitrofurantoin, urinary tract infection, uropathogens, E. coli, drug resistance Correspondence to: Dr.Sapna Soneja, Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, India. Email: drsapnabatra@gmail.com 1. Resident, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, India. 3. Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Amritsar, India. Introduction In current times drug resistance has reached epidemic proportions and has thrown a new challenge before the medical and scientific fraternity.1 The menace of drug resistance has even rendered the reserve drugs ineffective.2Presently, clinicians are struggling with urinary pathogens resistant to most of the oral drugs available like sulfonamides, flouro quinolones, cephalosporins and even the newer drugs like Faropenem.3Times have seen an increased incidence of extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria.4Studies have reported that more than 90% of urinary tract infections are due to enteric Gram-negative organisms, of which more than 80% are E.coli.5 In this age of multi drug resistance, there is a renewed interest in drugs belonging to the yesteryears, most importantly nitrofurantoin for lower urinary tract infections.6 Nitrofurantoin hits bacteria at multiple levels blocking bacterial enzymes involved in carbohydrate and protein synthesis, and subsequently at higher concentrations inhibits RNA and DNA formation by its action on bacterial ribosomes.7 Nitrofurantoin gets activated by the bacterial International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 07 No. 02 April’23 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31344/ijhhs.v7i2.568 163 International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 07 No. 02 April’23 reductases to form highly reactive electrophilic intermediates that damage bacterial ribosomal proteins.8 Nitrofurantoin has an oral bioavailability of 50% and is excreted primarily through the kidneys. This results in a high concentration in the urinary pathways though the plasma levels may be much lower.9A landmark study in Uppsala University Sweden,2014,had demonstrated 100% efficacy of nitrofurantoin in terminating ESBL and non ESBL E. coli. Same study also demonstrated 99% efficacy in killing of Vancomycin resistant and non-vancomycin resistant Enterococci.10 Nitrofurantoin has thus emerged as a cost- effective oral alternative in current era of antibiotic resistance.The susceptibility of uropathogens is known to vary in different geographical regions and even in same geographical region.11Most urinary tract infections are being treated empirically. In this retrospective study we aim to observe the prevalence of nitrofurantoin resistance in the Gram-negative uropathogen isolates.The aim of the present study was to observe bacterial profile in Gram-negative urinary isolates and evaluate the role of Nitrofurantoin against those isolates. Methods In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 500 consecutive Gram-negative bacterial isolatesfor bacteriological profile and nitrofurantoin sensitivity of patients of urinary tract infections at our tertiary care facility in Amritsar, India,betweenJanuaryandJuneof 2022. Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agarand finding interpreted with CLSI M100-S-31. Normally distributed continuous variables were recorded as mean and categorical variables were expressed as percentage. Results We had a total of 500 Gram negative urinary isolates.383(76.6%) of these were found to be susceptible to nitrofurantoin. E. coli alone constituted343(68.6%) of total 500Gram negative isolates, 264(76.96%) of which were sensitive to nitrofurantoin. 20 (4%) Proteus and 05(1%) Citrobacter species were isolated andfound to be resistant to nitrofurantoin. 12 (80%)out of the 15Acinetobacter isolates were resistant to nitrofurantoin. All 12 (100%)Pseudomonasisolates tested resistant to nitrofurantoin. Table 1:Sensitivity to nitrofurantoin of Gram- negative uropathgens Staining Sensitive to Nitrofurantoin Resistant to Nitrofurantoin Total Gram negative 383 117 500 Percentage 76.6% 23.4% 100 Table 2:Gram negative isolate profile Gram negative Isolate Frequency Percentage E. coli 343 68.6% Klebsiella sp. 105 21% Proteus 20 4% Citrobacter 5 1% Acinetobacter 15 3% Pseudomonas 12 2.4% Total 500 100% Discussion Urinary tract infections are one of the commonest infective pathologies affecting communities at large and are commoner in females because of anatomical reasons. Irrational antibiotic use has contributed to the emergence of multi drug resistant uropathogens, forcing clinicians to go back to old generation of drugs like nitrofurantoin. Shaifali et al. in their study on antibiotic susceptibility pattern of urinary pathogens found nitrofurantoin to be most effective drug against E.coli was the commonest uropathogen.12 Our Table 3: Isolate Sensitivity pattern to nitrofurantoin Isolate E. coli Klebsiella Proteus Citrobacter Acinetobacter Pseudomonas Sensitive 264 (76.96%) 77 (73.33%) - 3 (20%) - Resistant 79 (23.04) 28 (26.66%) 20 (100%) 5 (100%) 12 (80%) 12 (100%) Total 343 105 20 5 15 12 International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 07 No. 02 April’23 164 study has shown similar patterns. Kothari et al. too observed E. coli to be the commonest pathogen causing urinary infections and nitrofurantoin to be the most effective drug against it. They also highlighted poor activity of nitrofurantoin against Proteus sp.Our study revealedthat Proteus isolateswasresistant to nitrofurantoin, whilethey found 24.4% of E.coli isolates to be resistant to nitrofurantoin, that is marginally higher than the 23.04% observed in our study.13Kulkarni and associates studied the susceptibility pattern of E. coli to various antibiotics and foundE.coli to be the commonest of uropathogens. They also showed 92.41% sensitivity of E.coli to Nitrofurantoin.14 Singh and fellows studied the resistance pattern of uropathogens to nitrofurantoin and found alarming levels of resistance amongst Enterobacteriaceae. They found highest level of resistance (92.30%) to nitrofurantoin in Klebsiella sp. that is much higher than the 26.6% observed our study. They found nitrofurantoin to be effective against 69.9% of E. coli isolates.15 Sood et al. studied antibiotic resistance in various uropthogens and found E.coli to account for 61.84% isolates. They found nitrofurantoin resistance in only 5-6% E.coli isolates.16 Biswas et al. studied choice of antibiotics for empirical therapy of acute cystitis and found 9.3% resistance of E. coli to nitrofurantoin against 23.04% E.coli resistance observed in our study. They also found that more than 80% isolates resistant to fluoroquinolones are sensitive to nitrofurantoin.17 Tanweer et al. studied urinary infections in renal transplant patients and found E.coli in 51% isolates.They reported 76% of the organisms to be sensitive to antibiotics, 7% isolates were multi drug resistant while remaining were partially sensitive. They also found Pseudomonas to be the commonest multi drug resistant organism in post-transplant urinary infections. In our study we have 2.4%Pseudomonas isolates, all of which are resistant to nitrofurantoin.18 Conclusion To conclude, E. coli is the most common of uropathogens and despite the recent rise in antibiotic resistance, it continues to be sensitive to nitrofurantoin. Resistance to nitrofurantoin is also being reported and this calls for judicious use of this drug based on culture reports and local prevalence data. Conflict of interest: None to declare. Funding statement: None. Ethical approval: The studywas approved by the REB of Government Medical College, Amritsar, India. Authors’ contribution:Meghna Sharma was involved in conception and design of the study.All authors were equally involved in data collection, analysis, manuscript preparation, revision and finalization. 165 International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 07 No. 02 April’23 References 1. Gautam G, Gogoi S, Saxena S,et al. Nitrofurantoin Susceptibility Pattern in Gram-Negative Urinary Isolates: In Need of Increased Vigilance. J Lab Physicians. 2021;13(3):252-6. 2. Amladi AU, Abirami B, Devi SM, et al. Susceptibility profile, resistancemechanisms&efficacy ratios of fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin&colistin for carbapenem- resistantEnterobacteriaceae causing urinary tract infections. Indian J Med Res. 2019;149(2):185-91. 3. Kahlmeter G. ECO.SENS. An international survey of the antimicrobialsusceptibility of pathogens from uncomplicated urinary tract infections: the ECO.SENS Project. J AntimicrobChemother. 2003;51(1):69-76. 4. Garau J. Other antimicrobials of interest in the era of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and tigecycline. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14(Suppl. 1):198-202. 5. Ali S, Mandal S, Georgalas A, et al.A Pattern of Antibiotic Resistance in Gram-Negative Rods Causing Urinary Tract Infection in Adults. Cureus.2021;13(1):e12977. 6. Shakti L, Veeraraghavan B. Advantage and limitations of nitrofurantoin in multi-drug resistant Indian scenario.Indian J Med Microbiol. 2015;33:477-81. 7. Guay DR. An update on the role of nitrofurans in the management of urinary tract infections. Drugs. 2001;61:353-64. 8. McOsker CC, Fitzpatrick PM. Nitrofurantoin: Mechanism of action and implications for resistance development in common uropathogens. J AntimicrobChemother. 1994;33(SupplA):23-30. 9. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Nitrofurantoin: Rationale for the Clinical Breakpoints, Version 1.0; 2010. Available from: http://www.cast.org/antimicrobial_susceptibility_ testing/breakpoints/. [Accessed February 11, 2022]. 10. Komp Lindgren P, Klockars O, Malmberg C, et al. Pharmacodynamic studies of nitrofurantoin against commonuropathogens. J AntimicrobChemother.2015;70:1076-82. 11. Singhal A, Sharma R, Jain M, Vyas L. Hospital and community isolates of uropathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern from a tertiary care hospital in North West India. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(1):51-6. 12. Shaifali I, Gupta U, Mahmood SE, et al. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of urinary pathogens in female outpatients. North Am J Med Sci.2012;4:163-9. 13. Kothari A, Sagar V. Antibiotic resistance in pathogens causingcommunity-acquired urinary tract infections in India: Amulticenter study. J Infect Dev Countries.2008;2:354-8. 14. Kulkarni SR, Peerapur BV, Sailesh KS. Isolation and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Escherichia coli from urinary tract infections in a tertiary care hospital of North Eastern Karnataka. J Nat Sc Biol Med.2017;8:176-80. 15. Singh P, Malik S, Lal V. Resistance Pattern of Nitrofurantoin of Uropathogens in Different Age Groups at Dr. Lal Path Labs, National Reference Laboratory, Rohini, Delhi. Asian J MedHealth. 2019;16(1):1-8. 16. Sood S, Gupta R. Antibiotic resistance pattern of community acquired uropathogens at a tertiary care hospital in Jaipur, Rajasthan. Indian J Community Med.2012;37:39-44. 17. Biswas D, Gupta P, Prasad R, Sinha V, et al. Choice of antibiotic for empirical therapy of acute cystitis in setting of high antimicrobial resistance. Indian J Med Sci.2006;60:53-8. 18. Iqbal T, Naqvi R, Akhter SF. Frequency of urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients and effect on graft function. J Pak Med Assoc.2010;60:826-9. http://www.cast.org/antimicrobial_susceptibility_testing/breakpoints/. %5bAccessed http://www.cast.org/antimicrobial_susceptibility_testing/breakpoints/. %5bAccessed