IJHS, e-ISSN 2597-4718, p-ISSN 2597-470X, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 International Journal of Humanity Studies http://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/IJHS Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 221 A STUDY OF POLITENESS STRATEGIES USED BY ERIN GRUWELL IN FREEDOM WRITERS MOVIE Sharly Prisca Maria Leihitu and Veronica Triprihatmini English Language Education Study Program Universitas Sanata Dharma sharlyleihitu06@gmail.com and v.triprihatmini@usd.ac.id DOI: 10.24071/ijhs.v4i2.3239 received 28 December 2020; accepted 29 March 2021 Abstract This study aims to identify and describe the four politeness strategies and the factors which are proposed by Penelope Brown and Stephen C. Levinson as seen in an American movie entitled Freedom Writers. It is qualitative research since the focus is on analysing the utterances of the main character. The data is taken from the movie script. There are two research questions discussed in this study: (1) what are politeness strategies used by Erin Gruwell in the Freedom Writers movie? And (2) what factors influencing the politeness strategies? The findings show that Erin Gruwell applied the four politeness strategies, which are bald-on record, off-record, negative and positive politeness. However, the dominant strategy used by Erin is positive politeness, where Erin wants to get close and satisfy the hearer’s face. Related to the factors influencing the politeness strategies, the finding shows that there are two factors that affect Erin in choosing the politeness strategies: the payoffs and the sociological variables. In addition, sociological variables have three sub things: social distance, relative power and rank of imposition. Keywords: politeness, politeness strategy, Freedom Writers, language Introduction Communication plays an important role in human beings' lives. As human beings, we need to interact, socialize and exchange ideas with each other. In communication, language is an important instrument that is used by people in delivering messages. Through language, people not only are able to deliver the message, but they can also express feelings, criticise a problem, receive a message, or even ask people to do something. One of the issues in communication is politeness. According to Brown and Levinson (1987), the relevant concept of politeness is the concept of face. Being polite means respecting and maintaining other’s faces. Face is categorised into two, which are positive face and negative face. Positive face is defined by Brown and Levinson as the self-image that he or she wants to be desirable, to be mailto:sharlyleihitu06@gmail.com mailto:v.triprihatmini@usd.ac.id2 IJHS, e-ISSN 9999-2345, p-ISSN 1234-5678, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 222 appreciated, and to be liked by others. Meanwhile, a negative face is the self- image that wants to be free, independent, and not to be imposed by other people. Unconsciously, some people tend to threaten other’s face through their speech acts. We might see that many problems in such places are caused by our language choices, especially in the education field. As a teacher, or even students, we need to be more aware of language politeness in order to minimize this phenomenon which is still happening. By considering the latest phenomenon above, this study analyses the four politeness strategies proposed by Brown and Levinson found in an American movie entitled Freedom Writers. There are two research questions discussed in this study: (1) what are politeness strategies used by Erin Gruwell in the Freedom Writers movie? And (2) what factors influencing the politeness strategies?. Review of Related Studies and Theories There are several studies conducted on politeness strategies applying Brown and Levinson theory of politeness strategies. The first study was written by Liu Peng, Fang Xie, and Lingling Cai (2014) entitled A Case Study of College Teacher's Politeness Strategy in EFL Classroom. This study is a qualitative research since the focus is analysing teacher’s language in the classroom by using teaching learning recording. The second study was conducted by Mifta Hasmi (2013) entitled A Pragmatic Analysis of Politeness Strategies Reflected in Nanny Mcphee Movie. The focus of this study was the language politeness of the main character in the Nanny Mcphee. Hasmi (2013), and it applied descriptive qualitative approach. The third study was done by Widiadnya, I., Seken, K., and Santosa, M. (2018) entitled The Implications of Politeness Strategies among Teachers and Students in the Classroom. The data of this study was taken from tenth grade EFL teacher and some students of SMK Nusa Dua Bali. The data were collected through observations and interview. Brown and Levinson theory of politeness is also applied by the researcher in analysing the data. The fourth study was written by Ardi, H., Nababan, M., Djatmika, and Santosa, R. Entitled Politeness Strategy in Indonesian Translation: Has it already changed? This study is aimed at comparing politeness strategies used in directive act in the novel Deception Point written by Dan Brown (2001) and its two translation versions released in 2006 and 2015. This study uses four different theories as a reference in data analysis, which are speech acts theory proposed by Searle (1976), the concept of politeness related to face-saving by Brown and Levinson (1987), theory of translation techniques proposed by Molina & Albir (2002), the impact translation techniques toward the quality of translation used Nababan, Nuraeni, & Sumardiono (2012). The fifth study was written by Almoaily, M. (2018) entitled Greetings as a Politeness Strategy in EFL Distance Learning Students' Official Emails. The study analysed the EFL online students’ politeness strategy in greeting their supervisors through email. The researcher applied face theory from Goffman and politeness theory from Brown and Levinson. The sixth study was written by Marpaung, T. (2019) entitled Politeness Strategy among Teachers and Students in EFL Classroom. This study is a qualitative research since its purposed to find out the types of politeness strategy IJHS, e-ISSN 2597-4718, p-ISSN 2597-470X, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 223 by using Brown & Levinson theory (1987) and to find out the most dominant of politeness strategy of English teacher and grade eight students in classroom conversation. Speech Acts Language does not only produce sounds, words, or utterances. However, it carries action behind them all, namely speech acts. Speech acts is a sociolinguistics field and part of pragmatics study. According to Searle (1969) speech act is the production or issuance of a sentence token under certain conditions. It means that the uttering words or sentences are produced by the speaker based on the condition. There are three kinds of meaning in producing utterance; locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary (Austin, 1962). Locutionary The speaker produces an utterance as a particular linguistic expression with a particular structure and literal meaning (Austin, 1962) which means that what the speaker said to the hearer is the authentic meaning of the utterance without any reference. For instance, someone enters a room and finds that the room is not comfortable because of the temperature, and suddenly says “the room is superhot” this statement indicates that the temperature in that room is humid and hot. Illocutionary The illocutionary act is the social function that the utterance has, in which illocutionary means the act of doing something. For instance, when somebody asks “do you have some water?” after exercising, the illocutionary act is a request: “please give me some water.” In Searle taxonomy, there are five points of his taxonomy. These five points represent an important attempt to classify actions that people can perform their utterances. The first is directives, which is an attempt to make the hearer perform some future actions, such as requesting, ordering, and questioning. The second is assertives, an attempt to represent an actual state of affairs, such as asserting, concluding, informing, predicting, and reporting. The third is commissives, committing the speaker to a future course of action, such as warning, promising, threatening, and guaranteeing. The fourth is declaratives, an attempt to bring a change in some institutional state of affairs, such as declaring war and performing a marriage. The fifth is expressive, expressing a psychological state, such as thanking, complaining, greeting, and apologizing. Perlocutionary Perlocutionary is the result or effect that is produced by the utterance in that given text. It brings the consequence or effect of uttering sentences from the speaker to the hearer. The effect of the utterance can make someone do what the speaker has said. According to Searle, the effects can be enlightenment, inspiring, convincing, and persuading. Face According to P. Brown and S. C. Levinson (1978), face is defined as a basic ‘want’ of individuals. Face is something that is emotionally invested, lost, maintained, or enhanced and must be included in interaction. Face is categorised into two aspects, which are negative and positive faces. Based on Brown and Levinson in Politeness book “negative face is the basic claim to territories, IJHS, e-ISSN 9999-2345, p-ISSN 1234-5678, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 224 personal preserves, rights to non-distractions, for example: to freedom of action and freedom from imposition.” Positive face is the wants of someone which should be desirable by other people or at least some others, for example: life, health, honour, a positive self-image. Face Threatening Acts Face threatening act or FTA is the act of being impolite and can have risk to threaten either positive or negative faces. Very often we threaten other’s faces with our expressions and non-verbal communication, such as requesting, offering, giving suggestions, advising, or even staring at someone with no reason. Politeness Strategy In order to save hearer’s face of doing FTA in communication, politeness strategy is developed by Brown and Levinson in 1978. Politeness strategy is a strategy that is used to prevent a violation of the hearer’s face. Brown and Levinson divided human politeness behaviour into four strategies namely Negative Politeness Strategy, Positive Politeness Strategy, Bald On-Record Strategy, Off-Record Strategy. Negative politeness strategy appears when people show respect of deference, avoiding imposing or offending, acknowledging their “rights”. This means the speaker is trying to avoid offense and maintaining the distance between them and giving them an option to choose. Brown and Levinson (1987) propose the strategies to indicate negative politeness strategy as being conventionally indirect, questioning and hedging, being pessimistic, minimizing the imposition, giving difference, apologizing, impersonalizing speaker and hearer, stating the FTA as a general rule, nominalizing and going on record as incurring a debt, or as not indebting hearer. Positive politeness strategy refers to showing emphatic with someone, commiserating with one another about common problems, admiring the other’s taste in clothes by commenting approvingly, and friendly joking. According to Brown and Levinson (1987), there are 15 strategies to show positive politeness strategy, namely noticing and attending hearer, exaggerating, intensifying interest to hearer, using in-group identity markers, seeking agreements, avoiding disagreement, presupposing/raising/asserting common ground, joking, asserting or presupposing speaker’s knowledge of and concern for hearer’s wants, offering and promising, being optimistic, including both speaker and hearer in the activity, giving (or asking) reasons, assuming or asserting reciprocity, and giving gifts to hearer in the forms of goods, sympathy, understanding or cooperation. Findings and Discussion Politeness Strategies Used by Erin in Freedom Writers Movie In the Freedom Writers movie, the four politeness strategies are used by Erin Gruwell. She considers hearer’s public face as the important aspect to implement her politeness strategies in communication. The payoffs or result and sociological variables affect Erin’s politeness strategy, since those always appeared in the utterances. IJHS, e-ISSN 2597-4718, p-ISSN 2597-470X, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 225 Figure 1. Politeness strategies used by Erin Gruwell Positive politeness Positive politeness strategy is the dominant strategy found in Erin Gruwell’s utterances. According to the result, there are 105 utterances that are categorised as positive politeness strategy. This strategy is applied by speaker to protect her/his self-positive face, which includes the awareness of hearer’s wants and needs, the optimism, promising, complementing, and the use of personal pronoun such a “we” or “us” to imply that either speaker or hearer have the same value or the same in group. Brown and Levinson state some advantages of positive politeness strategy: giving compliment; satisfying hearer’s positive face; minimizing the Face Threatening Acts (FTA); and minimizing the intention of being debt such as requests and offers. There are several situations in which, positive politeness strategy is applied by Erin Gruwell in the movie, one of them can be seen where Eva comes to the classroom and talks to Erin. In this case, Eva has problem with her family and cannot go home for a while. Then, she asks Erin’s permission whether she can stay in or not. Erin’s response below is categorised as positive politeness strategy because it has saved Eva’s want in public. This utterance also belongs to illocutionary act, which shows an assertives type to inform that Erin let Eva to stay. Setting : room 203 Participants : Eva and Erin Situation : Eva asked Erin’s permission to stay late with her to do her work in the room. Time : 01:34:42 Eva : See, my aunt lives even further away, so I was just wondering if I could, like, stay here late with you, so I can get my homework done, 'cause it's late by the time I get home. Erin : You can stay as late as you want. And I can even drive you to your aunt's, if it gets too late. IJHS, e-ISSN 9999-2345, p-ISSN 1234-5678, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 226 The situation above, where Eva requests something to Erin, indicates that Eva is showing her positive face to Erin. Here, Eva’s wants or needs should be accepted by the hearer, if not, her positive face will threaten. Erin responds “you can stay as late as you want. And I can even drive you to your aunt's, if it gets too late.” This responds has totally saved Eva's positive face. Look at the first statement, “you can stay as late as you want.” It indicates that Erin accepts Eva’s request to stay in the classroom and she also gives Eva a freedom to stay for how long. This utterance also belongs to illocutionary act, which shows an assertive type to inform that Erin let Eva to stay. In the second statement, “and I can even drive you to your aunt’s, if it gets too late.” Erin attempts to get closer to Eva by offering something as if both of them are a close friend who will be there if the other needs help. Erin puts aside the distance between them. Negative politeness Negative politeness strategy is in the second place after positive politeness. The result shows that there are 31 utterances which belongs to negative politeness. According to Brown and Levinson (1987), negative politeness strategy is oriented towards hearer’s negative face and the basic want to maintain distance and self- determination. Negative politeness strategy has some characteristics which contrast with the previous strategy that have been explained above. Specifically, negative politeness is signalled by being self-effacement, being formality and restraint, being pessimistic, and being indirect. Moreover, the payoffs of negative politeness strategy are satisfy hearer’s negative face by giving respect and deference to hearer, avoiding incurring, maintaining the social distance and avoiding the threat. The example of negative politeness application strategy can be seen in the following dialogue, where Erin asked for discount to the bookkeeper. Erin attempts to be polite when asking for a discount to someone who she did not know before. The use of words “excuse me” and “could” are considered as polite way in delievering her intention. Moreover, the use of hedging “sort of” also indicates that Erin attempts to maintain hearer’s negative face by reducing the strength of her utterance of asking for discount. The strategy is suitable to be used when a speaker does not really know a hearer and wants to be seen polite. Furthermore, Erin’s utterance shows an illocutionary act, in which she is requesting a discount to a shopkeeper. Setting : in a book store Participants : book keeper and Erin Situation : Erin was in bookstore and looking for a book for the students Time : 00:55:55 Erin : Excuse me, if I wanted to order any books in bulk, could I get some sort of a discount? From her words above “Excuse me, if I wanted to order any books in bulk, could I get some sort of a discount?” Erin attempts to be polite when asking for a discount to someone who she did not know before. The use of words “excuse me” IJHS, e-ISSN 2597-4718, p-ISSN 2597-470X, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 227 and “could” are considered as polite way in delivering her intention. Moreover, the use of hedging “sort of” also indicates that Erin attempts to maintain hearer’s negative face by reducing the strength of her utterance of asking for discount. The strategy is suitable to be used when a speaker does not really know a hearer and wants to be seen polite. Furthermore, Erin’s utterance shows an illocutionary act, in which she is requesting a discount to a shopkeeper. Bald on Record On-record strategy is a direct, clear and unambiguous expression. The communication between speaker and hearer is straightforward and not rambling. In this strategy, the speaker does not really pay attention to the hearer's face, in which it might cause the hearer to get some shock. On-record strategy can be used in urgent situation. On-record strategy is in the third position after negative politeness. It has 21 points, according to the result. Erin Gruwell applies this strategy in some situations, one of them is in the classroom, the example can be seen in the following explanation, in which Erin is about the first time teaching in room 203, and is surprised that her students are impolite and rude in the classroom. Some inappropriate words are heard in the conversation between Erin and her students. The use of on-record strategy by Erin Gruwell conceives some payoffs or the advantages, which are enlisting pressure against the hearer, giving clarity, avoiding to be seen as manipulator and misunderstanding. The conversation can be seen in the following dialogue. Setting : room 203 Participants : Andre, Marcus, Eva, Jamal Situation : Erin was explaining the materials for today Time : 00:20:45 Andre : Think we don’t know Tupac? Marcus : White girl gonna teach us about rap. Erin : No, it’s not that. See, what I was trying to do... Eva : You have no idea. What you’re doing up there, do you? You ever been a teacher before? Jamal : And teacher gets nailed, y’all! Erin : All right, Jamal, enough. Jamal! That’s enough! You know what? I want you to move to this front seat right here now. Jamal : What? Erin : Come on. I am sick of these antics in my classroom. Erin Gruwell as the first time being a teacher in Wilson High School does not know her students’ character and condition at that time. She is shock when her expectation about being a teacher is not going well. Although, there are still some students who responds in good manners, but most students are aggressive, sensitive, rude and impolite. In room 203, Erin starts to teach her students about poetry and rhyme. She asks the students whether they know Tupac Shakur or not, a well-known rapper and actor in America. Tupac Shakur is chosen because his song lyrics and poetry IJHS, e-ISSN 9999-2345, p-ISSN 1234-5678, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 228 are so cool and sophisticated. Unexpectedly, Erin’s question is answered impolitely by some students. In the dialogue 1, after getting such a bad response from her students, Erin responds “All right, Jamal, enough. Jamal! That’s enough! You know what? I want you to move to this front seat right now.” This utterance shows that Erin does not like Jamal’s action who has underestimated a teacher through his actions in the classroom. Bald on-record strategy can be seen in Erin’s response, in which her utterance shows three hints of doing on-record strategy. She mentions his nickname (Jamal), she uses directives category of illocutionary speech act (I want you to move to this front seat), and she specifies the time (right now). Moreover, she adds “come on. I’m sick of these antics in my classroom.” In the following expression, it indicates Erin’s positive face has been threatened by the students’ utterances. Off Record In contrast with on-record, off-record strategy is an indirect way to say something. Here, a speaker lets the hearer decide what the speaker means, and the hearer should interpret by himself. Some linguistic realizations in off-record are used, such as metaphor and irony, rhetorical questions, understatement, and all kinds of hints that a speaker wants to communicate. Several advantages of off- record strategy are avoiding responsibility which potentially damages the hearer’s face, being tactful, and testing hearer’s feelings towards him. Based on the result, off-record is the lowest strategy found in the movie. The total utterances are 12. The example of off-record application can be seen in the dialogue 10, where Erin and Scott are talking about the latest discussion with her father in a restaurant, in which, what her father did actually made them offended. Here, Erin applies off record strategy by giving association clues to Scott. She presupposes her father with an actor in a book To Kill A Mocking Bird, Atticus Finch, a well- known lawyer who was competent in solving a problem by questioning witnesses. An illocutionary act is applied in Erin’s actions, where she complains to Scott about her father. Setting : in the bedroom Participants : Scott and Erin Situation : They were talking while brushing teeth. Time : 00:18:55 Erin : What’s happened to him? He was like Atticus Finch to me when I was growing up. In the utterance above, Erin applies off record strategy by giving association clues to Scott. She presupposes her father with an actor in a book To Kill A Mocking Bird, Atticus Finch, a well-known lawyer who was competent in solving a problem by questioning witnesses. An illocutionary act is applied in Erin’s actions, where she complains to Scott about her father. IJHS, e-ISSN 2597-4718, p-ISSN 2597-470X, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 229 The Factors Affecting Politeness Strategies by Erin Gruwell as The Main Character in Freedom Writers Movie This part defines some factors influencing the main character’s politeness strategies in the movie. There are two factors affecting the character’s politeness strategies, namely payoffs and sociological variables. The Payoffs According to Brown and Levinson, payoffs are the advantage of doing the four strategies. Since there are four politeness strategies, Brown and Levinson stated four different payoffs of each strategy based on their conditions. The four different payoffs reflected in Erin Gruwell’s statements are presented as follows. On-record Payoffs The use of on-record strategy by a speaker conceives some payoffs or the advantages, which are enlisting pressure against the hearer, giving clarity, avoiding to be seen as manipulator and misunderstanding. The example of on- record payoffs can be seen in the following dialogue. Dialogue 10 Erin : All right, Jamal, enough. Jamal! That’s enough! You know what? I want you to move to this front seat right here now. Jamal : What? Erin : I’m sick of these antics in my classroom. Erin was about to start the class by asking them about song lyrics which were written by Tupac Shakur who was an American actor and rapper. However, the students responded to Erin impolitely. Then, Erin used on-record strategy in this conversation by saying “I’m sick of these antics in my classroom” which indicates that Erin’s face has threatened by the students, that is why Erin’s effort to protect the students’ face was less, and preferred to be clear and direct in expressing her speech. The next example of on-record payoff can be seen in the dialogue 11, where Erin and Scott were arguing Erin’s profession as a teacher. Scott actually did not feel comfortable with what Erin was doing for her students because she has been very busy taking care of the students. Dialogue 11 Scott : They're not even your kids! Erin : Why do I have to be asked? Scott... I finally realized what I'm supposed to be doing and I love it. On-record strategy was used by both of them in the dialogue above. Erin’s response “I finally realized what I’m supposed to be doing and I love it” is the very clear, honest and unambiguous statement that Erin said to Scott as the reason why she was so busy just for the students. Another example of on-record strategy payoff is listed in the following dialogue. The circumstance is Erin was trying to explain why she could not continue teaching them in senior year. But then, a student named Marcus replied IJHS, e-ISSN 9999-2345, p-ISSN 1234-5678, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 230 to her, and it surprised Erin a little bit. The response from her student made her use an on-record strategy which can be seen as follows. Dialogue 12 Erin : I want you all to know that Dr. Cohn and I tried very hard. But it's been decided we can't continue with each other junior year. All students : What? What? Erin : You... Wait. Wait. Guys. Everyone. Marcus : No! That don't fly, Ma! Erin : Look, first of all, I'm not anyone's mother in here, okay? She emphasizes “look, first of all. I’m not anyone’s mother in here, okay?” to make the students understand that Erin was not their mother who would be together and help them forever. They could do something even with or without her. Positive Politeness Payoffs According to Brown and Levinson theory of factors influencing the choice of strategies, there are several advantages of positive politeness strategy. The payoffs are giving compliment, satisfying hearer’s positive face, minimizing the Face Threatening Acts (FTA) and minimizing the intention of being debt such as requests and offers. The following dialogue is the example of positive politeness payoffs. Dialogue 13 Erin : I want you to take one of these glasses of sparkling cider, and I want each of you to make a toast. We're each gonna make a toast for change. The students were shocked by Erin’s plan today. She prepared some glasses and bags to make a deal together. A toast for change indicates that nobody will never disturb them from now on and every voice that stops them should be disappeared. The he signal “we’re” Indicates that Erin avoided FTA such as requesting and offering by including hearer and speaker equally as participants. Another example of positive politeness strategy payoff can be seen in the scene, where a student asked to read his diary in front of the class, and Erin pleased him by saying “that’d be great.” Dialogue 14 Student A : Ms. G? Can I read something from my diary? Erin : That'd be great. “That’d be great” is the positive politeness strategy which indicates that Erin was trying to protect that student’s positive face. She satisfied the student by agreeing his request to Erin. Negative Politeness Payoffs Negative politeness strategy payoffs aims to satisfy hearer’s negative face by giving respect and deference to hearer, avoiding incurring, maintaining the IJHS, e-ISSN 2597-4718, p-ISSN 2597-470X, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 231 social distance and avoiding the threat. The dialogue 15 below is the example of negative politeness strategy payoff that the main character did in the movie. Dialogue 15 Ms. Campbell : Apparently you're taking your students on a trip? Erin : Yes, but it's over the weekend, so it won't affect any test schedules. I know how busy you are. And since I'm paying for it myself, I didn't want to bother you. The conversation started when Ms. Campbell asked Erin about a trip that Erin had planned with the students. Actually, Erin did not tell her about that plan because she did not want to disturb Ms. Campbell. However, it threatened Ms. Campbell's negative face as a principal in the school. She was mad at Erin and left her before Erin finished her words. Here, Erin showed her effort to save Ms. Campbell’s face by applying a negative politeness strategy. The utterance “I know how busy you are. And since I’m paying for it myself, I didn’t want to bother you.” Shows the reason why Erin used negative politeness strategy, in which the utterance indicates that Erin was showing her respect to Ms. Campbell by not disturbing her freedom as a principal. Another example of positive politeness payoff is listed in the dialogue 16, where Erin just came home late because she should drive the students’ home. The circumstance can be seen in the following dialogue. Dialogue 16 Erin : Sorry, it got late. I drove the kids home. I didn't want them taking buses. The underlined utterance above shows that Erin was giving an apology to her husband who has been waiting for her. She realized that it was already late at night and she just came home. Here, she was trying to minimize the potential face loss of her husband by apologizing. She also showed her respect to Scott because he was her husband. Off-record Payoffs Several advantages of off-record strategy are avoiding responsibility which potentially damages the hearer’s face, being tactful, and testing hearer’s feelings towards him. The dialogue 19 above is the example of off-record strategy payoffs. Dialogue 17 Her dad : I thought you were an architect. Erin : He is. He's just taking a break. Scott : And the money's good for now. Her dad : How much are you making? $27,000 before taxes? Erin : If you know, why are you asking? The example of off-record payoff can be seen in the conversation above, where Erin, Scott, and her dad were having dinner in a restaurant. Her dad started the conversation by asking Scott about his job. Since Erin applied to be a teacher, IJHS, e-ISSN 9999-2345, p-ISSN 1234-5678, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 232 her dad got suspicious whether Scott could earn money by himself or not. He interrogated Scott with some questions, who made Erin use negative politeness strategy to respond to her father “if you know, why are you asking?” which indicates that she used a rhetorical question to emphasize some points being discussed and have an obvious answer. Here, Erin let her father interpret by himself what actually the meaning of her words were. The use of this strategy means that Erin was avoiding responsibility for FTA interpretation. The Sociological Variables According to Brown and Levinson, besides payoff, another factor of choosing politeness strategy is influenced by sociological variables. Those variables are social distance, relative power and ranking of imposition. The detailed explanation will be served in the following discussion. Social Distance According to Brown and Levinson, social distance is the common factor influencing a speaker in choosing their politeness strategy. Commonly, social distance is determined by three things, which are age, gender and intimacy. If the social distance between speaker and hearer is close, the speaker can apply on- record and positive politeness strategies in their conversation. However, if the closeness and distance between participants is less, then, the speaker may use negative politeness or off-record strategies in a conversation. In this study, social distance always appears in the data, which means it is a factor influencing the speaker to choose the politeness strategies in his or her speech. Dialogue 18 Eva : See, my aunt lives even further away, so I was just wondering if I could, like, stay here late with you, so I can get my homework done, 'cause it's late by the time I get home. Erin : You can stay as late as you want. And I can even drive you to your aunt's, if it gets too late. Eva : Ms. G, let's not get nuts. The relationship between Erin and Eva is a teacher and student. However, in the conversation above, the way they both speak as if they are close friends. Erin wanted to satisfy Eva positive face by letting her to stay as late as she wanted, also, by giving an offer to drive Eva to her aunt’s home. Here, the use of positive politeness strategy is applied because the distance between them is less. Relative Power The relative power is also a factor affecting speakers in delivering their politeness strategy. Here, a speaker who has greater power than others, they can use either on-record or positive politeness strategies in their speech. On the other hand, a speaker who has low power in certain situation, they can use negative politeness or off-record strategies. The relative power example can be seen in the following illustrated. IJHS, e-ISSN 2597-4718, p-ISSN 2597-470X, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 233 Dialogue 19 Steve : Oh, no. No, no, no. Erin? Get back in the car. Erin : Dad, he lives right here. Steve : I'll get him. Get back in the car and lock your door. What's his name? Erin : Andre Bryant. Steve Gruwell is the father of Erin. As a father, Steve has higher power than Erin. By asking her “Get back in the car” “I’ll get him. Get back in the car and lock your door.” Erin could not ignore him. Her utterance “dad, he lives right here.” does not be listened by her father, in which it indicates that Erin has less power to rule her father. Erin realizes that if she ignores her father, she will do the FTA which is impolite as daughter to father. Rank of Imposition Rank of imposition is determined by the obscurity surrounding a speaker and hearer. Positive politeness or on-record strategies can be applied when the rank of imposition is less. On the other hand, a speaker can use negative politeness or off-record strategies when the rank of imposition is high in order to avoid face threatening acts. Dialogue 20 Scott : I feel like we haven’t talked about anything, other than your job, in like forever. Erin : I’m sorry In the conversation, Scott expressed what he felt to Erin. By saying “I feel like we haven’t talked about anything, other than your job” indicates that Scott is giving a clue to Erin which led Erin to interpret what Scott wants. Here, the rank of imposition is high because Erin did not realize that she has ignored Scott by talking her job only. Erin gives her regret to Scott for her mistake she made by applying negative politeness strategy “I’m sorry.” Conclusion Based on the findings, the first research question was answered by categorising the utterances of the main character using Brown and Levinson theory of politeness, and the study found that the four strategies (bald-on record, off-record, positive, and negative politeness strategy) are implemented by Erin in the movie. Positive politeness strategy is the most dominant strategy since the relationship between the main character and other characters is close. Meanwhile, in the second research question, the study found that there are two factors that affected Erin in using the politeness strategies in the movie. Those two factors are the payoffs and the sociological variables namely social distance, relative power and rank of imposition. Payoffs refers to the advantage or result of each politeness strategy. The payoffs in positive politeness strategy means, a speaker wants to be close to hearer, satisfy hearer’s face, and minimize acts that can threaten hearer’s face. For bald-on record, a speaker wants to be direct, clear and unambiguous in uttering speech. Meanwhile, the payoffs in negative politeness strategy, a speaker satisfies hearer’s freedom of not to be imposition and respects hearer’s negative IJHS, e-ISSN 9999-2345, p-ISSN 1234-5678, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 234 face. The advantage of doing off-record politeness strategy, a speaker can avoid responsibility in damaging hearer’s face and test hearer whether he or she cares to the speaker or not. The study can add more knowledge related to some values in politeness either for English teachers or students who deal with language. Dealing with language does not stop in learning the rules or enriching vocabulary, yet, politeness is an important part of learning a language. Therefore, through the study, all English teachers and students are expected to have more knowledge by reading and understanding the study which contains politeness, its strategies and factors influencing the choice of politeness strategy. References Almoaily, M. (2018). Greetings as a politeness strategy in EFL distance learning students' official emails. Retrieved on March 28, 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad- Almoaily/publication/329058989_Greetings_as_a_Politeness_Strategy_in_E FL_Distance_Learning_Students%27_Official_Emails/links/5bf3c6bba6fdc c3a8de37c04/Greetings-as-a-Politeness-Strategy-in-EFL-Distance-Learning- Students-Official-Emails.pdf Ardi, H., Nababan, M., Djatmika,. Santosa, R. Politeness strategy in Indonesian translation: Has it already changed? Retrieved on March 27, 2021, from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingprasasti/article/view/1536/4414 Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brown, R & Gilman A. (1989). Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedy. Retrieved on November 27, 2019, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4168029.pdf?ab_segments=0%252Fbasic_e xpensive%252Fcontrol&refreqid=excelsior%3Af56dcbadf5278ffb0adaf46d a2057279 Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan bahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Christanto, D. & Monita, D.C. Politeness strategy used in Englishforums.com discussion. Retrieved on April 9, 2020, from https://sanata- dharma.academia.edu/DaninChristianto?swp=tc-au-34922180 Dilano. (2014). What is politeness and why should we be polite. Retrieved on February 18, 2020, from http://britishenglishcoach.com/what-is-politeness- and-why-should-we-be-polite/ Eckert, P. & McConnell-Gniet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Freedom Writers Script. Retrieved on September 4, 2019, from http://www.script- o-rama.com/movie_scripts/f/freedom-writers-script-transcript.html Gratias, B. D. (2018). Politeness strategies used by the main character in Bad Teacher Movie. Retrieved on September 4, 2019, from file:///F:/Semester%20VII/RP/politeness%20articles/141214015_full.pdf Hasmi, M. (2013). A pragmatic analysis of politeness strategies reflected in Nanny Mcphee Movie. Retrieved on March 27, 2021, from https://eprints.uny.ac.id/21114/1/Mifta%20Hasmi%2006211141022.pdf Holtgraves, T. (2002). Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad-Almoaily/publication/329058989_Greetings_as_a_Politeness_Strategy_in_EFL_Distance_Learning_Students%27_Official_Emails/links/5bf3c6bba6fdcc3a8de37c04/Greetings-as-a-Politeness-Strategy-in-EFL-Distance-Learning-Students-Official-Emails.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad-Almoaily/publication/329058989_Greetings_as_a_Politeness_Strategy_in_EFL_Distance_Learning_Students%27_Official_Emails/links/5bf3c6bba6fdcc3a8de37c04/Greetings-as-a-Politeness-Strategy-in-EFL-Distance-Learning-Students-Official-Emails.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad-Almoaily/publication/329058989_Greetings_as_a_Politeness_Strategy_in_EFL_Distance_Learning_Students%27_Official_Emails/links/5bf3c6bba6fdcc3a8de37c04/Greetings-as-a-Politeness-Strategy-in-EFL-Distance-Learning-Students-Official-Emails.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad-Almoaily/publication/329058989_Greetings_as_a_Politeness_Strategy_in_EFL_Distance_Learning_Students%27_Official_Emails/links/5bf3c6bba6fdcc3a8de37c04/Greetings-as-a-Politeness-Strategy-in-EFL-Distance-Learning-Students-Official-Emails.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad-Almoaily/publication/329058989_Greetings_as_a_Politeness_Strategy_in_EFL_Distance_Learning_Students%27_Official_Emails/links/5bf3c6bba6fdcc3a8de37c04/Greetings-as-a-Politeness-Strategy-in-EFL-Distance-Learning-Students-Official-Emails.pdf https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingprasasti/article/view/1536/4414 http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/f/freedom-writers-script-transcript.html http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/f/freedom-writers-script-transcript.html https://eprints.uny.ac.id/21114/1/Mifta%20Hasmi%2006211141022.pdf IJHS, e-ISSN 2597-4718, p-ISSN 2597-470X, Vol. 4, No. 2, March 2021, pp. 221-235 235 Jaworski, A. & Coupland, N. The discourse reader. Retrieved on November 5, 2019, from https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_64421/component/file_2225570/content Marpaung, T. Politeness strategy among teachers and students in EFL classroom. Retrieved on March 28, 2021, from http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr- jhss/papers/Vol.%2024%20Issue4/Series-9/H2404095155.pdf McKay, S. L. & Hornberger, N. H. (2005). Sociolinguistics and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). California: SAGE Publications. Peng, L., Xie, F. & Cai, L. (2014). A case study of college teacher’s politeness strategy in EFL classroom. Finland: ACADEMY PUBLISHER. Retrieved on March 27, 2021, from http://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol04/01/16.pdf Pratiknyo, R. K. N. (2016). A pragmatics analysis of positive and negative politeness strategies of refusals in Richard Linklater’s Boyhood. Retrieved on March 14, 2020, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/78025524.pdf Rahastri, C. (2017). Politeness Strategies Used by Ellen Degeneres and U.S. Politicians in the Ellen Show. Retrieved on December 8, 2019, from file:///F:/Semester%20VII/RP/politeness%20articles/131214013_full.pdf Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. New York: Cambridge University Press. Wahyuni, S. (2019). Qualitative Research Method Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat. Widiadnya, I., Seken, K., and Santosa, M. (2018) The implications of politeness strategies among teachers and students in the classroom. Retrieved on March 27, 2021, from https://www.shs- conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2018/03/shsconf_gctale2018_00067.pd f Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2024%20Issue4/Series-9/H2404095155.pdf http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2024%20Issue4/Series-9/H2404095155.pdf http://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol04/01/16.pdf https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2018/03/shsconf_gctale2018_00067.pdf https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2018/03/shsconf_gctale2018_00067.pdf https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2018/03/shsconf_gctale2018_00067.pdf