International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) – eISSN: 1865-7923 – Vol. 14, No. 8, 2020 Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i08.13185 Karmila Rafiqah M. Rafiq, Harwati Hashim (), Melor Md Yunus, Helmi Norman Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia harwati@ukm.edu.my Abstract—Due to the rise of the digital era, various industries demand em- ployees with a proficient communicative English skills, but many are still not up to par with the demands. One solution for this is to provide communicative English trainings for employees, especially support staffs, yet face-to-face train- ings have many limitations, which can be overcome through mobile learning. Due to the fact that mobile learning can be accessed anytime and anywhere by anyone, the Massive Online Open Courses (MOOC) is one of the platforms that can be used to curb the issue. This paper aimed to identify the perceptions of support staffs towards using ‘ìSPEAK: English for the Workplace’ in MOOC. A total of 30 respondents were selected through purposive sampling and a sur- vey through a 4-point Likert scale questionnaire was given out. The main find- ings showed that overall, the support staffs have a positive attitude towards us- ing ìSPEAK. Nevertheless, half of them were unsure of the reliability of the sources available in the course. However, the findings of this study implied that ìSPEAK could be one of the training alternatives for support staffs to improve and increase their communicative ability. Future research can look into design- ing and developing various modules of communicative English in various mo- bile learning platforms, which could cater to different levels of proficiency of learners. Keywords—Communicative English; English for the Workplace, MOOC, self- paced learning, support staffs, technology-enhanced language learning 1 Introduction In this new digital era, aside from the rapidly evolving technologies, the status of the English language as a global language is irrefutable. The importance of mastering the English language has been emphasised in many non-native countries as a means of communication [1], [2]. Employers are keener on hiring employees with good proficiency in the English language. This is due to the fact that in order to bring an organisation up, relations with international organisations is crucial, which requires interaction with foreigners [3], [5]. Hence, the only means of communication with people of different mother tongues is through the use of English. iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 8, 2020 19 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i08.13185 mailto:harwati@ukm.edu.my Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ Yet, even in this 21st-century world, many employers complained that their em- ployees do not possess the required proficiency in communicative English [6], [8]. The lack of English proficiency among employees causes an organisation to not be able to rise to its potential. Due to that, communicative English training for employ- ees, especially support staffs is important. However, looking at the busy schedule and working commitments throughout the year, certain employers find it difficult to con- duct trainings to improve their employees’ communicative English. This is because trainings need to be comprehensive and relaxed [4] so that the employees do not feel stressed in learning communicative English. Hence, to curb the issue of time constraint, exploiting technology can be an alterna- tive [9], [10]. An open learning platform can be used as a substitute for face-to-face training. Open learning platforms, such as the Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) has been recognised worldwide as a free learning platform. It has various benefits which include being free, open and allows learners to learn at their own pace [11], [12]. The fact that everyone has their own mobile device [13] is also an ad- vantage and should be fully utilized when it comes to learning. One of the MOOC courses available to improve the communicative English of employees is known as ‘ìSPEAK: English for the Workplace’, which is hoped to be able to provide a better learning experience for employees to improve their communicative English as they are learning at their own pace. To further improve this course in MOOC, this study aimed to identify the perceptions of support staffs towards using ìSPEAK, an online self-paced learning module to improve communicative English for the workplace. 2 Literature Review 2.1 Self-paced learning In this globalized era, education is not only restricted to classroom learning. Self- paced learning brings the meaning of learning independently, in which lesser interac- tion happens between the teacher and student [14]. One of the reasons for the arising need in self-paced learning is due to time constraint [15]. This is because, most of the learners are occupied with their own routine, so they have lesser time to learn a new skill. Learners who are working gain more benefits from this self-paced learning. Working learners have a tight working schedule, whereby they need to balance be- tween their job prospects and time for family [15]. These learners do not have much time to go for classes to learn a new language or skill. With the worrying scenario of the decline in English language proficiency among workers [16], employers either provide training for their staffs or they will find new staffs to replace the old ones. Due to that, MOOC has been an uprising platform for learners to learn a new skill or language independently at any place and time [17], [19]. 20 http://www.i-jim.org Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ 2.2 Self-paced learning through MOOC In self-paced learning through MOOC, learners are more prone to complete a course if it is not too lengthy [20], [22]. This is because a lengthy course will make learners feel bored and they might feel burdened as they have to juggle between their job time and learning independently. Learners who find MOOC to be burdening tend to drop out of MOOC without completing the course [21]. These dropout learners prefer a more relevant and shorter course which they can learn in their own pace and the outcome is achievable. Plus, learners are not able to commit their time for MOOC because of their non-supportive learning environment. Learners who are pressured by their surroundings in working, such as having tight working schedules and non- supportive employers will affect their completion rate in MOOC too [20]. The main reason for the success of self-paced learning is because employees feel more appreciated [23]. Additionally, with the support from employers, employees are more willing to learn by themselves to develop their professionalism to suit the de- mand of the working field, which could also benefit the organization [23], [24]. Other than employers’ support, the reason for self-paced learning is also due to the MOOC’s characteristic, which is openness. Some studies have shown that MOOC provides an open, flexible and easy to access platform, which is suitable for everyone and can cater to the workers’ needs [25], [28]. Findings from previous studies showed that learners have different intentions to use MOOC. Learners with the goal of lifelong learning, such as to improve their skills for employability in the future will have a positive attitude towards MOOC [29], [30]. Some learners also enrol in MOOC be- cause they want credits for their courses [31]. Regardless of the reasons for learners’ enrolment in MOOC, the factors which keep learners learning in MOOC are more important. Factors such as easy to use and useful are usually the crucial reasons [32], [33] other than being reliable, accessible and provides a comfortable learning envi- ronment [31]. Plus, learners who are positive towards learning through MOOC tend to have a higher completion rate of the online course [34] and learners are more attracted to MOOC if they have their own autonomy in choosing what they want to learn first [35], [36]. However, a study reported findings that showed that learners, especially older learners, prefer MOOC to be used as an addition to their traditional face-to-face training because the learners are unexposed to the proper ways in accessing materials in MOOC effectively [37]. But, in this digital era, technology is not an alienated tool anymore [9], [38]. Hence, in order to identify learners’ thoughts towards MOOC, the technology ac- ceptance model (TAM) is used as the framework, whereby variables of perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU) and attitude towards using (ATU) MOOC are identified. This is due to the fact that, despite being in the 21st-century era, the challenges of using technology such as low computer literacy, insufficient resources and inaccessible online materials which were a barrier back then [39] are still the barriers now to some older users [40], [42]. iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 8, 2020 21 Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ 2.3 The use of mobile for learning With a lot of technologies available, mobile phones are the most common tool which is possessed by almost everyone [13]. Mobile phones, which were initially used for communication purposes are now being used in learning. The changes in features of mobile phones through the years have made it possible to induce learning in a mo- bile form [43]. The term mobile learning or m-learning has become popular among researchers, whereby the benefits of mobile learning is undeniable. The most im- portant feature of mobile learning lies in its flexibility to be used anywhere and any- time [44], [45]. Additionally, mobile learning also condones to self-paced learning, which is said to provide a personalised learning environment for learners who are able to participate in the lesson freely, without any restriction. This allows learners to be more motivated and engaged in the learning [44], [46]. Hence, the advantages of mo- bile learning, especially mobile learning through MOOC, provides an array of bene- fits for learners, especially learners with working commitments. 2.4 The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) The technology acceptance model or TAM was developed to predict and identify an individual’s perceptions towards using a technology [47]. In this model, there are five constructs known as the perceived ease of use (PEOU), perceived usefulness (PU), attitude towards using (ATU), behavioural intention (BI) and actual use [47]. PEOU and PU are related to the BI and ATU because learners or users who perceived a technology to be useful and effortless will be more prone to use it in aiding their daily tasks [48], [49]. Additionally, technology users who perceive technology to be useful will have a more positive attitude and their intention to use it regularly is high- er [48]. As TAM emerges, many researchers in the technological field are more in- clined towards using the model to evaluate the usability of technology because TAM is simple and easy to understand [49]. Figure 1 depicts the technology acceptance model (TAM). Fig. 1. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Figure 1 is the adapted version of TAM, which is adapted from Davis (1986) [48]. In TAM, the three main constructs are the Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Attitude towards Using (ATU). This means that if a user per- ceives a technology to be easy and useful, they will have a more positive attitude 22 http://www.i-jim.org Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ towards using it. Then, ATU will determine the Actual Use of technology. It is also important to know whether the course is user-friendly in terms of usefulness and easy to use, which can influence the attitude and behaviour. In this case, if a user has a positive attitude towards technology, he or she will develop an intention to use it. The intention to use will affect the actual usage of the technology. Hence, this model gives an insight towards users’ acceptance towards a new technological tool, which is im- portant to know whether the users will use it or not. 3 Methodology This empirical study employed a survey method of data collection, which consists of a 4-point Likert scale questionnaire. Respondents were chosen using purposive sampling, whereby they attended a workshop to demonstrate the usage of ìSPEAK: Communicative English Module MOOC. ìSPEAK is a Communicative English Mod- ule in MOOC, which consists of ten modules of English for workplace training as shown in Figure 2. Fig. 2. The ten modules available in ìSPEAK As portrayed in figure 2, the ten modules are named as module 1 to 10, which con- sist of the introduction, greetings, talking on the phone, making requests, offering help, giving suggestions, handling complaints, email or letter writing, show and tell (presentation skill) and conclusion respectively. Each module except the introduction and conclusion consists of four subsections. Figure 3 below shows the sample of the subsections in the modules. iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 8, 2020 23 Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ Fig. 3. Sample of subsections in Module 2 Based on the figure, it can be seen that there are four subsections for the module known as the video content, notes, grammar focus and task. All learners are required to complete the course to get a certificate of completion. Upon completion of the workshop, all 30 participants were asked to go through ìSPEAK and try out all learn- ing activities. Later, they were required to respond to a questionnaire, which consisted of 40 items, divided into four parts, which are the demographic background, with eight items, perceived ease of use (PEOU) in part 2 with six items, perceived useful- ness (PU) in part 3 with eight items and attitude towards using (ATU) in part 4 which consisted of eight items. All items were adapted from Norizan and Hussein (2017) [50] and and Rosly and Khalid (2018) [51]. A pilot study was carried out to determine the reliability of this questionnaire and the Cronbach Alpha value of 0.88 showed that the questionnaire is reliable. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics in terms of percentages and frequency count. 4 Results 4.1 Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) Based on the survey, the data on support staffs’ perceived ease of use (PEOU) to- wards iSPEAK were plotted into table 1. 24 http://www.i-jim.org Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ Table 1. Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) towards iSPEAK Statements Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree I think ìSPEAK is easy to use 3.3% (1) 3.3% (1) 40.0% (12) 53.3% (16) I think ìSPEAK is easy to master in a short time 3.3% (1) 30.0% (9) 60.0% (18) 3.3% (1) I think ìSPEAK is easy to understand (interface and menus) 3.3% (1) 6.7% (2) 60.0% (18) 30.0% (9) I think it is essential for learners to possess com- puter basic skills (e.g. saving files, creating fold- ers) to benefit from ìSPEAK 3.3% (1) 6.7% (2) 43.3% (13) 46.7% (14) I think it is essential for learners to possess Internet basic skills (e.g. sending emails, signing in/out, downloading/uploading files) to benefit from ìSPEAK 3.3% (1) 3.3% (1) 36.7% (11) 56.7% (17) I need a lot of training on using computers/Internet to learn effectively through ìSPEAK 3.3% (1) 20.0% (6) 33.3% (10) 43.3% (13) Based on the table, it can be seen that most respondents perceived ìSPEAK to be overall easy. They agreed that ìSPEAK is easy to use (93.3%), easy to master in a short time (90%) and easy to understand (90%). Despite being easy to use, a majority of them agreed that knowing the basic skills of computers is important in order to access ìSPEAK with ease (93.4%). 4.2 Perceived Usefulness (PU) Table 2 below displayed the results for support staffs’ perceived usefulness (PU) towards ìSPEAK. Table 2. Perceived Usefulness (PU) towards iSPEAK Statements Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree I think learning English through an open online course, such as ìSPEAK is useful in improving my communicative English 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 46.7% (14) 53.3% (16) I think ìSPEAK can be a useful training platform for workers 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 50.0% (15) 50.0% (15) I think learning through ìSPEAK can increase my productivity in learning 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 40.0% (12) 60.0% (18) I think ìSPEAK is a useful tool in developing my English writing skill 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 40.0% (12) 60.0% (18) I think ìSPEAK is a useful tool in developing my English reading skill 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 46.7% (14) 53.3% (16) I think ìSPEAK is a useful tool in developing my English listening skill 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 46.7% (14) 53.3% (16) I think ìSPEAK is a useful tool in developing my English speaking skill 20.0% (6) 26.7% (8) 26.7% (8) 26.7% (8) ìSPEAK is able to provide effective learning resources 23.3% (7) 26.7% (8) 26.7% (8) 23.3% (7) iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 8, 2020 25 Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ Referring to table 2, all respondents agreed that ìSPEAK is useful in improving their communicative English, is a useful training platform for workers, increases their productivity in learning and useful in improving their English listening, reading and writing skills (100%). However, 53.4% of the respondents agreed that ì SPEAK improves their English speaking skills and only half of them agreed that ìSPEAK is able to provide effective learning resources (50%). 4.3 Attitude Towards Using (ATU) The support staffs’ attitude towards iSPEAK were displayed in table 3 below. Table 3. Attitude towards Using (ATU) iSPEAK Statements Strongly disagree Disagree Agree Strongly agree I am eager for learning communicative English through ìSPEAK 0.0% (0) 6.7% (2) 43.3% (13) 50.0% (15) Using ìSPEAK to learn communicative English is better than using the traditional instructions 0.0% (0) 3.3% (1) 66.7% (20) 30.0% (9) I really need ìSPEAK to improve my communicative English 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 56.7% (17) 43.3% (13) I like to chat through the ìSPEAK forums 0.0% (0) 6.7% (2) 56.7% (17) 36.7% (11) Learning communicative English through ìSPEAK makes me nervous 16.7% (5) 43.3% (13) 26.7% (8) 13.3% (4) Learning communicative English through ìSPEAK is not interesting 36.7% (11) 33.3% (10) 16.7% (5) 13.3% (4) Using the ìSPEAK to learn communicative English bothers me 33.3% (10) 40.0% (12) 13.3% (4) 13.3% (4) Using the ìSPEAK to learn communicative English scares me 43.3% (13) 30.0% (9) 13.3% (4) 13.3% (4) Based on the results from the survey as plotted in table 3, it can be seen that a ma- jority of the respondents have positive attitude towards using ìSPEAK as they are eager to learn with ìSPEAK (93.3%), they like it as it is better than traditional instruc- tions (96.7%) and they like to chat through the forums (93.4%). All of the respondents responded that they need ìSPEAK to improve their communicative English (100%). 5 Discussion The findings showed an overall positive perception of support staffs towards using ìSPEAK. The most crucial factor which contributes to the positivity lies in the useful- ness of MOOC [26]. As can be seen, a majority of support staffs perceived ìSPEAK to be useful in assisting them in learning Communicative English for the Workplace. This is deemed important because a tool which is perceived to be not useful will not be used by learners. Not only that, MOOC as mentioned in many studies, is undenia- bly useful as it allows learners to learn at their own pace, which will indirectly max- 26 http://www.i-jim.org Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ imise the learning input gained as learners are able to put more emphasis in learning at their own time rather than learning everything in one day [30], [32]. Due to that feature of MOOC, learners are interested in using ìSPEAK as it provides a useful learning environment, which could cater to various learners, especially adult learners who are working. Next, ìSPEAK is easy to use as perceived by the support staffs. This is because MOOC has an easy interface and it also provides a tour or guidelines for first-time learners [31]. Learners find it easy to master ìSPEAK in a short time as MOOC only deals with basic computer skills such as downloading and uploading files. Regardless of that, it is important to note the targeted audience as well to ensure that the interface of ìSPEAK can be created in a user-friendly manner for those who are unfamiliar with it. Browsing through the learners’ background, a learner’s age might influence their perceived ease of use (PEOU) as older learners might not be a technology-savvy [41], [42]. Yet, with the current revolution, almost everyone owns a mobile phone, in which MOOC can be accessed through the applications available, which is equally convenient for everyone [9], [10]. Finally, ìSPEAK sparks positive attitudes from the support staffs. Most learners agreed that they are eager to learn through ìSPEAK. One of the reasons is due to time constraint for face-to-face learning [4]. Using MOOC, learners can access learning anywhere and anytime they want based on their own free time [30], [34], [35], [52]. Due to that, they prefer to use MOOC rather than attending face-to-face training courses. Plus, learners who are well aware of the importance of learning CE are more inclined to use ìSPEAK to improve themselves. 6 Conclusion This paper aimed to find out the perceptions of support staffs towards ìSPEAK. The findings reported positive perceptions towards using ìSPEAK as a platform for self-paced learning. However, some learners are still unsure of the reliability of the resources available in ìSPEAK, either they are useful for their workplace or not. Thus, this paper implied that employers can look into alternatives to improve their staffs’ communicative English by encouraging them to enrol in ìSPEAK. In the future, re- search can look into designing and developing various modules of communicative English in various platforms, which could cater to different levels of proficiency of learners. With that, online open learning can be an educational tool which could be an alternative learning platform for everyone especially in encouraging self-paced learn- ing. 7 Acknowledgement This research is funded by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) under the re- search grant no. KRA-2018-044. iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 8, 2020 27 Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ 8 References [1] N. Arumugam, T. Xavier, L. C. Dass, and M. Maniam, “Unemployment among Graduate Nurses in Malaysia : A Case Study,” Asian Social Science, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 227–233, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n9p227 [2] K. I. Mona and A. I. Yehia, “Communicative English language teaching in Egypt: Class- room practice and challenges,” Issues in Educational Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 285– 313, 2017. [3] A. Fitzpatrick and R. O’Dowd, English at Work: An Analysis of Case Reports about Eng- lish Language Training for the 21st -century Workforce. 2012. [4] X. Qing and B. Adamson, “How effective is workplace English for Occupational Purposes (EOP) training? Case studies of corporate programs in the Chinese con-text.,” Asian ESP Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 151–184, 2015. [5] R. R. Rasalingam and M. A. Embi, “The Use of Communicative Language Teach-ing (CLT) in the Teaching of English Courses among Malaysian Polytechnics Lec-turers,” In- ternational Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 254–264, 2018. [6] B. J. Hirsch, “Wanted : Soft skills for today’ s jobs,” Phi Kappan, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 12–17, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717690359 [7] Jebunnesa and I. Abdullah, “An investigation of the English proficiency of poten-tial nurs- es from University College Shahputra and Kolej Kejururawatan by Occu-pational English Writing Test: A case study,” IOSR Journal of Humanities and So-cial Science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 62–63, 2013. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-1816263 [8] N. Mustafa, N. Nordin, and M. A. Embi, “A Need Analysis for a Communicative English Mobile Learning Module for Healthcare Professionals,” International Journal on E- Learning and Higher Education, vol. 6, pp. 13–24, 2017. [9] H. Hashim, “Application of Technology in the Digital Era Education,” Interna-tional Jour- nal of Research in Counseling and Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2018. [10] M. M. Yunus, “Innovation in Education and Language Learning in 21st Century,” Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 33–34, 2018. [11] H. U. Hashim, M. Y. Yunus, and H. Hashim, “The Use of Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) for ESL Learning : An Analysis of Learning Theories,” Interna-tional Journal of Engineering and Technology., vol. 7, pp. 136–138, 2018. [12] R. McGreal, “Special report on the role of open educational resources in supporting the sustainable development goal 4: Quality education challenges and opportuni-ties,” Interna- tional Review of Research in Open Distance Learning, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 292–305, 2017. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3541 [13] N. Choudhury, “World Wide Web and Its Journey from Web 1.0 to Web 4.0,” BMC Bio- informatics, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 8096–8100, 2014. [14] A. G. Picciano, “Theories and Frameworks for Online Education: Seeking an Inte-grated Model,” Online Learning, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 166–190, 2017. [15] S. N. A. Baharudin, M. Murad, and N. H. H. Mat, “Challenges of Adult Learners: A Case Study of Full Time Postgraduates Students,” in 6th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2012), 2013, vol. 90, pp. 772–781. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.151 [16] T. S. T. A. Jalal, “Workplace English : An analysis of communication needs,” in In- ternational Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2016, pp. 1379–1388. 28 http://www.i-jim.org https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n9p227 https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717690359 https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-1816263 https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3541 https://doi.org/10.%0b1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.151 https://doi.org/10.%0b1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.151 Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ [17] W. W. Lie and M. M. Yunus, “Flipped for a Betterment: The Acceptance Level Towards Flipped Learning Among Malaysian ESL Learners,” Journal of Education and Develop- ment, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 69–75, 2019. https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v3i1.569 [18] K. R. M. Rafiq, H. Hashim, M. M. Yunus, and F. N. Pazilah, “Developing a MOOC for Communicative English : A Battle of Instructional Designs,” International Journal of Inno- vation, Creative and Change, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 29–39, 2019. [19] H. W. You, “Students’ Perception about Learning using MOOC,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 14, no. 18, pp. 203–208, 2019. https://doi.org/10. 3991/ijet.v14i18.10802 [20] S. Karnouskos, “Massive open online courses (MOOCs) as an enabler for compe-tent em- ployees and innovation in industry,” Computers in Industry, vol. 91, no. October, pp. 1–10, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.05.001 [21] F. Schwerer and M. Egloffstein, “Participation and Achievement in Enterprise MOOCs for Professional Learning,” in 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2016), 2016, pp. 269–276. [22] N. A. Shukor and Z. Abdullah, “Using Learning Analytics to Improve MOOC In- structional Design,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies, vol. 14, no. 24, pp. 6–17, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i24.12185 [23] J. Castaño Muñoz, M. Kalz, K. Kreijns, and Y. Punie, “Influence of employer sup-port for professional development on MOOCs enrolment and completion: Results from a cross- course survey,” in Proceedings of the European MOOC Skateholder Summit on experienc- es and best practices in and around MOOCs - EMOOOCS 2016, 2016, pp. 251–263. [24] U. Olsson, “Open courses and MOOCs as professional development – is the open-ness a hindrance?,” Education and Training, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 229–243, 2016. https://doi.org/10. 1108/et-01-2015-0006 [25] J. Castaño-Muñoz, K. Kreijns, M. Kalz, and Y. Punie, “Does digital competence and oc- cupational setting influence MOOC participation? Evidence from a cross-course survey,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 29, pp. 28–46, 2017. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s12528-016-9123-z [26] H. U. Hashim and M. M. Yunus, “Digital Learning with Massive Open Online Courses (Moocs) : English for Communication Haida,” Modern Journal of Lan-guage Teaching Methods, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 77–80, 2019. [27] H. Z. Ng and S. S. Baharom, “An analysis on adult learners’ satisfaction in online educa- tion programmes,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 70–85, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i7.9665 [28] D. Petronzi and M. Hadi, “Exploring the Factors Associated with MOOC Engage-ment, Retention and the Wider Benefits for Learners,” European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 112–129, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2016-0011 [29] J. Loizzo, P. A. Ertmer, W. R. Watson, and S. L. Watson, “Adult MOOC learners as self- directed: Perceptions of motivation, success, and completion,” Online Learn-ing Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, 2017. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i2.889 [30] C. K. Mee, L. K. M. Sui, and S. binti Salam, “Undergraduate’s perception on Mas-sive Open Online Course (MOOC) learning to foster employability skills and en-hance learning experience,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 494–499, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2018.091060 [31] A. W. Cole and C. E. Timmerman, “What Do Current College Students Think about MOOCs ?,” Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 188–202, 2015. iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 8, 2020 29 https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v3i1.569 https://doi.org/10.%0b3991/ijet.v14i18.10802 https://doi.org/10.%0b3991/ijet.v14i18.10802 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.05.001 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i24.12185 https://doi.org/10.%0b1108/et-01-2015-0006 https://doi.org/10.%0b1108/et-01-2015-0006 https://doi.org/10.%0b1007/s12528-016-9123-z https://doi.org/10.%0b1007/s12528-016-9123-z https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i7.9665 https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2016-0011 https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i2.889 https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2018.091060 Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ [32] N. Aharony and J. Bar-Ilan, “Students’ Perceptions on MOOCs: An Exploratory Study,” Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, vol. 12, pp. 145–162, 2016. https://doi.org/10.28945/3540 [33] E. Costello, J. Brunton, M. Brown, and L. Daly, “In MOOCs we trust: Learner per- ceptions of MOOC quality via trust and credibility,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 214–222, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3991/ ijet.v13i06.8447 [34] B. Huang and K. F. Hew, “Factors influencing learning and factors influencing per- sistence: A mixed-method study of MOOC learners’ motivation,” in ACM Interna-tional Conference Proceeding Series, 2017, vol. Part F1282, no. April, pp. 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077584.3077610 [35] M. Zhang, S. Yin, M. Luo, and W. Yan, “Learner control, user characteristics, plat-form difference, and their role in adoption intention for MOOC learning in China,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 114–133, 2017. https://doi.org/10. 14742/ajet.2722 [36] N. Zhang, “Development and application of an English network teaching system based on MOOC,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 149–160, 2018. [37] O. Sukhbaatar, L. Choimaa, and T. Usagawa, “Students’ Perception and Experi-ence of Massive Open Online Courses in Mongolia,” Creative Education, vol. 09, no. 12, pp. 1818–1828, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.912132 [38] S. S. Oyelere, J. Suhonen, and E. Sutinen, “M-learning: A new paradigm of learning ICT in Nigeria,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v10i1.4872 [39] M. M. Yunus, “Malaysian ESL teachers’ use of ICT in their classrooms: Expecta-tions and realities,” ReCALL, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 79–95, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344007 000614 [40] J. E. Chung, N. Park, H. Wang, J. Fulk, and M. Mclaughlin, “Age differences in per- ceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the Tech- nology Acceptance Model,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, pp. 1674–1684, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.016 [41] E. Johnson, R. Morwane, S. Dada, G. Pretorius, and M. Lotriet, “Adult Learners’ Perspec- tives on Their Engagement in a Hybrid Learning Postgraduate Pro-gramme,” Journal of Continuing Higher Education, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 88–105, 2018. https://doi.org/10. 1080/07377363.2018.1469071 [42] J. Li, R. Kay, and L. Markovich, “Student attitudes toward blended learning in adult litera- cy and basic skills college programs,” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 1–36, 2018. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27573 [43] N. Bukharaev and A. W. Altaher, “Mobile Learning Education has Become More Accessi- ble,” American Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2017. https://doi.org/10.21767/2349-3917.100005 [44] A. Kukulska-hulme and O. Viberg, “Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 207–218, 2018.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12580 [45] M. Alrasheedi and L. F. Capretz, “Determination of critical success factors affect-ing mo- bile learning: a meta-analysis approach,” Turkish Online Journal of Educa-tional Technol- ogy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 41–51, 2015. 30 http://www.i-jim.org https://doi.org/10.28945/3540 https://doi.org/10.3991/%0bijet.v13i06.8447 https://doi.org/10.3991/%0bijet.v13i06.8447 https://doi.org/10.1145/3077584.3077610 https://doi.org/10.%0b14742/ajet.2722 https://doi.org/10.%0b14742/ajet.2722 https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.912132 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v10i1.4872 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344007%0b000614 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344007%0b000614 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.016 https://doi.org/10.%0b1080/07377363.2018.1469071 https://doi.org/10.%0b1080/07377363.2018.1469071 https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27573 https://doi.org/10.21767/2349-3917.100005 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12580 Paper—ìSPEAK: Using Mobile-Based Online Learning Course to Learn ‘English for the Workplace’ [46] L. Dias, “Teaching and Learning with Mobile Devices in the 21st Century Digital World: Benefits and Challenges,” European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 339–344, 2017. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p339-344 [47] V. Venkatesh and H. Bala, “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions,” Decision Sciences, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 273–315, 2008. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x [48] F. D. Davis, “A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user infor- mation systems: Theory and results [Dissertation],” 1986. [49] W. R. King and J. He, “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model,” In- formation and Management, vol. 43, pp. 740–755, 2006. [50] A. R. Norizan and A. D. A.-S. Hussein, “Attitude towards MOOC among Iraqi EFL Stu- dents,” in 5th Kuala Lumpur International Studies and Civilisations (KLIISC 5), 2017, pp. 158–169. [51] R. M. Rosly and F. Khalid, “Evaluation of the ‘e-Daftar’ System Using the Tech-nology Acceptance Model (TAM),” Creative Education, vol. 09, no. 05, pp. 675–686, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.95049 [52] Rusli, R., Hashim, H., Yunus, M. M., Zakaria, N. Y. K., & Norman, H. (2019). Lev- eraging the Use of Social Media in Teaching Writing: A Qualitative Investigation among ESL Pre-Service Teachers. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 13(11), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i11.10910 9 Authors Karmila Rafiqah M. Rafiq is a final year postgraduate student pursuing Masters in Education (TESL) in the Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. Harwati Hashim is a Senior Lecturer/Assistant Professor at the Centre of Innova- tions in Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malay- sia (UKM). Email: harwati@ukm.edu.my Melor Md Yunus is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia and is currently the Deputy Dean (Research and Innovation) at the Centre of Innovations in Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). Helmi Norman is the assistant dean for teaching and learning at the Centre of In- novations in Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). Article submitted 2020-01-14. Resubmitted 2020-02-18. Final acceptance 2020-02-20. Final version published as submitted by the authors. iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 8, 2020 31 https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p339-344 https://doi.org/10.%0b1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x https://doi.org/10.%0b1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.95049 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i11.10910 mailto:harwati@ukm.edu.my