International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) – eISSN: 1865-7923 – Vol. 14, no. 12, 2020 Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General Chemistry Classroom https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i12.15591 Yusran Khery (), Masjudin, Ahmad Muzaki, Baiq Asma Nufida Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram, Indonesia yusrankhery@ikipmataram.ac.id Yesi Lesnawati LITPAM, Mataram, Indonesia Sri Rahayu, Nur Candra Eka Setiawan Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia Abstract—Development of student understanding of nature of science, con- ceptual understanding, and scientific literacy on learning must be supported by proper learning process. An offline and online environment on mobile learning oriented with Nature of Science oriented learning can be considered to commit. Mobile-Nature of Science (Mobile-NOS) is suitable model of learning for this purpose. Evaluating the influence of Mobile-NOS model of learning application towards Students' understanding of nature of science, chemistry concept under- standing, and scientific literacy on general chemistry learning are focus of this study. This study was carried out by posttest only control group design, in form of quasi experimental. There are 44 sample determined by saturated sampling technique of general chemistry students as population. Sample divided into two group equally, the experimental and control group. Data were collected by un- derstanding nature of science questionnaire, scientific literacy test, and chemis- try conceptual understanding test. Data was analyzed by independence sample t test. The result of the study showed that the application mobile-NOS model of learning make students better on understanding of nature of science, conceptual understanding, and scientific literacy. Keywords—Mobile-NOS model of learning, understanding of nature of sci- ence, conceptual understanding, scientific literacy. 1 Introduction In developed world, More than 95% of students in colleges are users of smart mo- bile devices and use this for academic purposes. Using the mobile devices can sup- porting students learning on the move at any place and any time as new task of learn- ing [1][2][3]. The use of mobile technologies in education impacts student motivation. 122 http://www.i-jim.org https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i12.15591%0d mailto:yusrankhery@ikipmataram.ac.id Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... Mobile learning environment provide collaboration, information sharing, mobility and interactivity for students, teachers, and the university [4]. Mobile technology has support the born of the concept of mobile learning as new teaching and learning tech- niques. [5] [6] defined mobile learning as the application of tablets, PCs, or smartphones technology in the learning process. Designing mobile technology for learning in university should provide an appro- priate, supportive, enriched environment for this method of learning [7][8]. Students convenience with the interactivity and accessibility of mobile learning [9]. This en- courage students in fun learning activities and place students as the main subject in learning, foster motivation to learn, foster to develop student skills, so learning be- comes meaningful [10][11][12]. However, mobile learning must be for education the main objective, not for entertainment [13]. Effective mobile learning should accom- modate students to actively participating in the knowledge building process. There- fore, there is a need for mobile applications that create effective environments which are student centered [14][6]. Guiding students become problem solvers who have scientific characters must be- come main purpose of chemistry learning. Student is able to compare natural tenden- cies and distinguish of objects and events naturally. Effective learning environment must be completed with assignments to improve effectiveness in shaping and using concepts. Students must develop skills to complete assignments and science process consciously. Helping students to understanding knowledge, producing ideas, develop- ing concept, transforming concept into skills, making formulations, testing hypotheses are requirements for effective learning environment [15]. The better science process on learning, the better learning achievement will be [16] [17] [18] [19]. The results of observation by researchers, the level of understanding in the nature of science in first-year students at Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika is 66,192 with medium category. In line with research [20], most students currently have a moderate level of understanding of NOS. Most of these research subjects are in the intermediate level in their studies at the university. Undergraduate students should have a high understanding of nature of science because this can change as it advances to higher levels of study. Researchers suggest that efforts to raise understanding in the nature of science are still needed at universities [21] [22]. According to [23], focus on the understanding of the nature of science (NOS) as a form of human knowledge and inquiry can force student performance achievement in science learning. The main objective of science curriculum today is integrating nature of science (NOS) and establish it as important learning goal [24][25]. Understanding NOS is a characteristic that is expected to exist in someone who has scientific literacy [26]. So that, developing mobile learning must be oriented to the nature of science. According to [27], science teaching approach should be regarded as “education through science”, rather than “science through education”. Nature of science educa- tion is aim to give foundations based on activity theory rather than logical positivism. Understanding NOS links to establish the achievement of personal domain, stressing intellectual and communication skill development, promotion of character and posi- tive attitudes, achievement in the social education domain, stressing cooperative learning, and socio‐scientific decision‐making. Although the nature of science is seen iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 12, 2020 123 Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... as an important component of science education, the over‐riding target for science teaching is based on enhancing scientific and technological literacy. NOS learning as inquiry approach providing constructivist learning experiences and develop student scientific literacy [28][29]. However, this requires quite long learning time, while learning time in the chemistry curriculum in Indonesia only 200- 300 minutes per week. The inquiry learning experience cannot always cover all as- pects of NOS. Moreover, Less than 30% of the NOS aspects explicitly present on Indonesian high school chemistry textbook [20]. Collaboration of mobile learning in inquiry-based Nature of Science (NOS) named Mobile-NOS model of learning estab- lished on this study. Mobile-NOS model of learning should be supported by mobile applications on smartphone. These can be interactive module applications, teaching materials, social media, and learning websites that used both inside and outside the classroom by teachers and students. Mobile-NOS model of learning must be able to show the as- pects of the nature of science explicitly through learning process. The stages of learn- ing are reading context in electronic articles, in-depth question and answer, case ob- servation, procedures demonstration, case study research, carrying out procedures, communicating science knowledge, and authentic assessment [30]. How mobile-NOS model of learning play role to student performance and achievement of understanding NOS, concept understanding, and scientific literacy are issues that still need to be evaluated on chemistry learning. 2 Methodology This research conducted with quasi experimental method and carried out by post- test only control group design at the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika. There are 44 students of General Chemistry course on academic years of 2018/2019 selected by purposive sampling technique divided into experimental and control group. Experimental group was learned by mobile-NOS model of learning, while control group by conventional learning method. The data of this study consist of understanding of NOS, conceptual understanding, and scientific literacy. The data were collected by understanding of NOS question- naire, conceptual understanding test, and scientific literacy test. Understanding of NOS questionnaire was tested by conduct on 84 students of Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika. Instrument validity was analyzed by product moment correlation and reliability by three split technique of Alpha correlation test [31]. This questionnaire consists of 39 valid items predictor of 10 understanding of NOS aspect with very high reliability coefficient about 0.802. Conceptual understanding and scientific literacy test respectively consist of 15 and 22 valid items with 0,699 and 0,824 of reliability after tested on 40 subjects. Data of this research was analyzed by independence sam- ple t test assisted with Ms. Office Excel 2010 and SPSS 16.0 for windows. 124 http://www.i-jim.org Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... 3 Result and Discussion 3.1 Effect of mobile-NOS model toward understanding of NOS The nature of science aspects was observed on this study. Students understand that knowledge is tentative meaning students understand that the truth of science knowledge is temporary until the discovery of new scientific evidence. In chemistry, we are familiar with theories about the atomic model. The Thomson atomic model in his day was considered to be true knowledge in accordance with the available evi- dence through the cathode ray experiment. But after an experiment of alpha rays into thin plates of gold carried out by Rutherford, the truth of the Thomson atomic model was refuted. Scientific knowledge that is believed at this time might be denied by the new scientific evidence in the future. Students who understand that science knowledge is tentative can also accept that an investigation of the same science object may have different results or change. For example, knowledge about molecular mass- es that were once predicted by Raoult law has now changed after the discovery of the spectroscopic method. Students who understand that scientific knowledge is based on empirical data are aware of the urgency of experimentation as a method of collecting data. They believe in scientific knowledge as a truth that must be supported by data in a real context. For example knowledge of the law of the rate of a particular chemical reaction must be supported by appropriate rate data. Sometimes science knowledge comes only from human thought and there is no data that can prove its truth. But the results of such thought are very logical and can be used to explain scientific phenomena. This aspect of the nature of science can be understood by students who understand that some scientific knowledge is a product of human inference. For example, the octet rule, a thought put forward by W. Kossel and G.N. Lewis, can be used to predict and explain atomic bonding form a compound. The fourth aspect of the nature of science is the human creativity needed to devel- op knowledge, to differentiate / create data images. For examples, the scientific knowledge about atomic models that only depended on spectrum data. Thomson, Rutherford, and Bohr creativity have provided us with information about how to un- derstand, describe, and elaborate the model of atom based on each experimental data. Student who understanding this aspect, can accept facts about every scientific meth- ods can be change or develop by human creativity / ideas. On chemistry, various methods of measuring or analysis of solutions, such as titrimetric, potentiometric, spectrophotometry, are examples of scientific methods developed with human creativ- ity. Cathode ray experiment, alpha light scattering, the spectrum of hydrogen atoms, are various methods of human creativity for describing the atomic model. Students who understand the scientific method, understand how the scientific method is carried out which consists of formulating the problem, compiling an exper- imental plan, collecting data, analyzing data, and making conclusions. However, they agreed to open up those who could use the existing trial steps and modify procedures sometimes needed. Students who understand that knowledge cannot be separated from the theory / understanding of scientists (driven by theories), can position scien- iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 12, 2020 125 Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... tific theories as they should. They can accept the existence of different theories for explain a phenomenon. This aspect appears very much in the material of chemical science. For example the bonds in compound, can be understood with the octet / Lew- is theory or molecular orbital theory. The form/structure of molecule can be elaborat- ed by hybridization theory or VSEPR theory sometimes. Students who understand the nature of science can position scientific law and sci- entific theory well. Students believe laws of science cannot be refuted, while the truth of scientific theory is not absolute. Science theory can be disputed, refined, or accept- ed by the presence of new theories. In many chemical science subjects containing this aspect, for example in bonds forming, the octet rule is no longer considered an ade- quate theory to explain the phenomenon of bonding in relations after the appearing of valence bond theory, VSEPR and molecular orbital theory. They can also accept that they can choose a theory to explain an exact phenomenon and not use another theory. Students know that some of the laws, theories, concepts, and procedures of science are named according to their inventors. For example Raoult law, Bohr's theory, Avo- gadro's number, and the Karl-Fischer method are named after the inventor. These students understand aspects of the nature of science, namely the social dimension of science. They can also accept that science is built with scientific agreements that in- herited continuously by scientist, researchers, and inventors. For example, an agree- ment about 1 mole which is equivalent to the Avogadro number (6.02 x 1023) parti- cles or similar charges repel and different types of attraction will attract each other is the foundation concept that builds the knowledge of chemical science to date. Students realize that science is built on the basis of traditional culture and vice ver- sa, the development of science can affect human lifestyles and culture. Students who realize this understand the nature of science in the social and cultural fields. The cul- ture of scientists in Germany in the early 20th century who examined the phenomenon of photons has provided a new perspective to explain various scientific objects such as the electronic state of atoms, chemical bonds and molecular shapes, as well as spectroscopy and spectrophotometry. The discovery of radioactivity and core reac- tions has changed the way humans obtain energy, detect and treat disease, and breed superior agricultural crops. Students' understanding on every aspect of the nature of science for experiments and control class as presented in Figure 1. (1.scientific knowledge is tentative; 2. scientific knowledge comes from empirical data; 3. Scientific knowledge is a product of human inference; 4. human creativity is needed to develop knowledge; 5. scientific method; 6. Knowledge is inseparable from the theory / understanding of scientists (Theory driven); 7. Scientific law; 8. Scientific theory; 9. social dimension of science; 10. Planting science in the social and cultural fields). 126 http://www.i-jim.org Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... Fig. 1. Students understanding of NOS aspects after learning Based on the study, the highest score of students understanding of NOS lies in the knowledge cannot be separated from the understanding of scientists with a high cate- gory and the lowest score lies in scientific law with sufficient category, while the rest are in the good category. The results are in line with the results of the study [20] [32] [33]. The average understanding of students about the nature of science experiment class (69,801) is higher than control class (66,192). T test results show that t statistic is greater than t critical. There for, it must be concluded that students' understanding of NOS is better with Mobile-NOS model application. Table 1. t test results in Understanding of Nature of Science Group N Mean tstat df t Critical (two-tail) Sig. Experiment 22 69,801 5,353 42 2,021 0,000 Control 22 66,192 The results showed that most students believed that scientific knowledge should only be in the form of facts that can be felt by the human senses neither abstract. Ac- cording to [34], science must only be in the form of observation and experiment. Stu- dents believe that science phenomena should be explained as they are without human imaginations involved. Most students disagree that theory is the result of human crea- tivity. Most students agree all experiments must be completed with hypotheses. Most students disagree the subjective and irrational of humans though also work scientific knowledge building. Most students assume that scientific law is solely derived from logical thinking, and theory will never be scientific law. This understanding of the nature of science needs to be improved so that students have a greater chance of success in learning science. According to [33], the stronger belief that science knowledge is changing and tentative (in the epistemological as- pects of science), the higher understanding and curiosity in science. Student epistemic beliefs about the development of scientific knowledge have a direct effect on the knowledge domain. Beliefs about justification of scientific knowledge have direct and 71.36 76.30 70.86 62.96 67.53 79.01 55.00 72.59 77.28 73.70 69.8069.6370.3767.90 58.52 64.07 78.27 51.85 70.07 71.85 69.81 66.36 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 O v e ra ll A v e ra g e S c o re Nature of Science Aspects Exepriments Control iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 12, 2020 127 Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... indirect effects on the goals of the attainment and acquisition of knowledge. Under- standing of NOS will support student achievement in learning science [21]. Stages of learning activities in the core part of mobile-NOS learning are reading context in electronic articles, in-depth questioning, case observation and observation, demonstration of procedures, searching literature, implementing procedures, and communicating science knowledge [23]. At the stage of reading context in electronic articles, students read articles in a mo- bile application or website that has been provided or recommended by the teacher. At this stage students can understand the characteristics of NOS namely the development of scientific knowledge can influence and be influenced by social, cultural, or com- munity values. In the deep question and answer stage, the lecturer asks in-depth ques- tions related to articles. Lecturers conduct question and answer with students so stu- dents know the background knowledge they need. Activities are carried out outside the classroom through groups that the teacher has created on social media or learning websites. At this stage students can understand the characteristics of NOS ie scientific knowledge can be derived from the results of the inference of scientists. Inference is a reasonable explanation about scientific phenomena or facts that can be seen in daily life or through experimentation. At the stage of case observation and intervention, students are tasked with solving contextual cases through an investigation process. This activity is carried out in class. The lecturer guides students to propose a problem statement and formulate a hypothe- sis. This activity is carried out through groups that have been made by lecturers on social media or learning websites. At this stage students can understand the character- istics of NOS, scientific knowledge can be derived from the scientist’s inference. At the procedure demonstration stage, the lecturer presents a live demonstration of the investigation method related to the case which will be solved through video / pic- ture that has been available through a mobile learning facility. For this purpose, the lecturer can provide the video / image through the learning website, share files or links through social media groups, or ask students themselves to search for videos or related images via the internet. At this stage students can understand the characteris- tics of NOS such as based on empirical data and scientific methods. In the literature search stage, the lecturer guides students to conduct library studies related to learning topics. At this stage the lecturer can explain explicitly the charac- teristics of NOS, namely knowledge cannot be separated from the Driven Theory of previous scientific understanding of a phenomenon or scientific knowledge. Driven theory can be a reference for students in explaining the phenomena they will observe in experimental activities. On this occasion, students who understand about scientific theory and law can explain the characteristics of theory and scientific law and their position in science. Students can also understand that scientific knowledge is tenta- tive, (temporary) which is indicated by the existence of various theories or explana- tions of a particular scientific phenomenon. Lecturers can also provide understanding that the results of the experiments they will obtain may be different. By understanding that scientific knowledge is tentative, students will be more confident in explaining the results of their observations. 128 http://www.i-jim.org Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... At the stage of carrying out the procedure, the lecturer asks students to prepare an investigative procedure. At this stage the lecturer can convey explosively the charac- teristics of NOS namely scientific knowledge can develop thanks to the creativity of humans / scientists, scientific creativity is needed to develop knowledge. The method compiled by scientists is one of scientific knowledge. The lecturer then asks students to carry out the investigative procedures that they have compiled. Students are also allowed to make modifications of procedure during the practicum process. In condi- tion, the procedures they have prepared previously have weaknesses or obstacles in implementation. At this time students can understand the experimental procedures carried out in order to obtain empirical data to build knowledge. At the stage of communicating science knowledge, lecturers ask students to pre- pare reports as the results of activities or to fill in the report formats in form of work- sheets. After preparing a report or worksheet, the lecturer can ask students to present the results of their experiments in a group discussion. At this stage students can gain an understanding of the social dimensions of science that require a form of apprecia- tion for the work, experiments, or critical ideas to scientists. The form of appreciation can be in the form of providing opportunities for scientists to present their findings. Then more than that, actual scientific knowledge can be disseminated in this way. Knowledge of science can be a reference or basis for the development of scientific knowledge next. At this stage students are also welcome to include solutions that are considered appropriate for the problem. Lecturer can explain the cultivation of science in the social and cultural fields explicitly. Science develops to solve human and envi- ronmental problems, improve the quality of life, or balance out lifestyles. The applica- tion of science products must consider the socio-cultural aspects of society. Nature of science-oriented learning can encourage students to become: 1) utilitari- an, understand science and manage technological objects and processes in everyday life, 2) democratic, make decisions on socio-scientific issues, 3) cultural, appreciate the value of science as part of contemporary culture, 4) morals, developing under- standing of the norms of the scientific community that embody moral commitments about general values to society, 5) science learning: fulfilling the tasks of learning. Learning based on Nature of Science can make students' abilities in applying concepts and understanding of the nature of science better [35] [36] [37]. However, this study shows that the increase that occurred in understanding of the nature of science is still relatively low at 69,801. In contrast to studies conducted by [35], understanding of the nature of junior high school students reached an average of 79.17. This could have happened due to differences in the measurement instruments for understanding of the nature of science used. In addition, the implementation of learning that is very short in this study, only one learning activity, causing the in- crease that occurred is still relatively low. Learning that explicitly includes NOS, whether integrated with the material or not, can be used to improve students' under- standing of NOS. However, it needs to be considered the use of learning time must be realistic [38][39]. Therefore it is very necessary to consider providing a more learning experience so that the achievement of understanding the nature of students can be higher. Understanding of the science nature can have an impact on student perfor- mance in science learning process. Other studies have shown that NoS-oriented learn- iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 12, 2020 129 Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... ing can positively influence the understanding and belief in the nature of science, the ability to apply concepts and learning outcomes [36] [40]. 3.2 Effect of mobile-NOS model toward conceptual understanding Data on students' understanding of concepts was obtained from the results of rea- sonable, multiple-choice questions given after all learning activities were carried out. The distribution of students' understanding of the concept provide on fig. 2. Based on this research result, it appears that the average understanding of students 'concepts understanding in the experimental class is higher than the control class. The average score of concept understanding of experimental class is 72.12, while control class is 62.72. Students on experimental class who excellent on concept understanding are 2 students, 18 students are on good category, and 2 students are on poor category. 13 students of control class are on good category and the rest, 9 students on poor category. The significance value is smaller than the significance level (α = 0.05), so the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. It can be concluded that there is a significant influence of mobile-NOS model of learning on student concept understanding. When conducting learning activities on control class, students are only fixated with the teacher's explanation without any reciprocity. The exchange of information only oc- curs within the group environment and when working on test questions. Information obtained during the practicum and discussions with group members are limited. Better things happen on experimental class. Students reach their conceptual understanding through learning activities on classroom and undergo self-study with mobile-NOS application media assisting. Fig. 2. Number of Student on Conceptual Understanding Categories Table 2. t Test Result of Conceptual Understanding Data Group N Mean t stat df tcritical (two-tail) Sig. Experiment 22 72.12 4.315 42 2,021 0,000 Control 22 62.72 2 18 2 0 13 9 0 5 10 15 20 Excelent Good Poor Experiment Control 130 http://www.i-jim.org Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... 3.3 Effect of mobile-NOS model toward scientific literacy Data on scientific literacy of students was obtained from the results of reasonable multiple-choice test results given after all learning activities were carried out. The results of the distribution of scientific literacy scores of the experimental class and control class of students can be seen in Fig. 3. Fig. 3. Number of students on scientific literacy categories. Table 3. T Test Result of Scientific Literacy Data Group N Mean t Stat df t Critical two-tail Sig. Experiment 22 76.10 6.336 42 2,021 0,000 Control 22 64.05 Based on research result, the average score of student scientific literacy in the ex- perimental class is higher than the control class. The average score of scientific litera- cy of students in experimental class is 76.10 and control class is 64.05. Independent sample t-test for students scientific literacy data obtained t arithmetic is 0,000 <0.05. It can be concluded that there is an effect of the mobile-NOS model of learning on students' scientific literacy. The result of this study showed that mobile-NOS model application supporting student to achieve better scientific literacy on chemistry learning. The scientific litera- cy aspects observed in this study are content, context, process, and attitude. Through the steps of mobile-NOS model of learning can greatly support the achievement of students' scientific literacy. The stages of mobile-NOS model of learning are reading context in electronic articles, in-depth questions and answers, case observation, demonstration of procedures, library research, carrying out procedures, communi- cating science knowledge, and authentic assessment [23]. This learning model is facil- itated also with mobile learning devices that already developed with considering what is suggested by [5], there are contextual features, learning content, learner behavior, and adaptation methods. 6 16 00 15 7 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Excelent Good Poor Experiment Control iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 12, 2020 131 Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... Mobile-NOS model of learning, supports learning characteristics that refer to [27] are gave foundations based on activity theory rather than logical positivism, encom- passes an understanding of NOS, links with the achievement of goals in personal domain, intellectual stressing and communication skills development, promotion of character and positive attitudes, plus achievement of goals in the social education domain, stressing cooperative learning and socio-scientific decision-making. At the stage of reading context in electronic articles, students understand the con- text of knowledge they will learn, students having foundations based on activity rather than logical positivism in the process of gaining knowledge. The context presented can be in the form of socio-scientific issues. Articles are provided on mobile learning application media. Every student obtained this application on first time learning car- ried out. The context on the article should be closed to student daily life. According to [41] mobile learning integration is more successful when aligned with local cultural context. Mobile learning tools that might be culturally appropriate in one context may not always be accepted in another. In the in-depth question and answer stage, there will be stressing intellectual and communication skills development, as well as the promotion of character and positive attitudes in students. This stage not only classroom activity but also discussion through text message or social media application on group that initiate by teacher. According to [42][43] in discussion via text message, learning transfer occurred and being influenced most by learner’s characteristics especially in term of their motiva- tion as well as their perceive utility/value of the learning to their academic perfor- mances. Through the stages of case observation and demonstration of procedures students understand the mastery of knowledge about the content, context, and scien- tific processes that are foundations based on activity theory rather than logical positiv- ism. At the library research stage, aspects of the content of the material are deepened by students according to their needs based on the context that is the focus of learning. On this stage, students must realize knowledge they need. At the stage of carrying out procedures students work in groups, promotion of character and positive attitudes occur here. The mastery aspect of science process skills occurs at this stage. At the communicating science knowledge stage, through the group presentation process, students can again experience stressing intellectual and communication skill development. Aspects of mastery of content and knowledge context are needed here. If students discuss socio-scientific issues then they will be forced onto socio-scientific decision-making. The attitude of those who can under- stand differences of opinion on an issue will make them experience promotion of character and positive attitudes. Students' experiences in mobile learning make them more aware of the goals of learning. Study of [44] showed mobile learning can help developing students self-efficacy. According to [45], there is a positive effect of mo- bile learning on the knowledge acquisition, learners’ achievements, attitudes and motivation despite the high cognitive load. On that way, students who are taught with the mobile-NOS model of learning can succeed in achieving scientific literacy. 132 http://www.i-jim.org Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... 4 Conclusion Based on the study results, the value of t statistic for understanding of the NOS, conceptual understanding, and scientific literacy data respectively are 5.353, 4.315, 6.336 that greater than t critical (2.021) in the one-tail hypothesis test using independ- ence sample t test. Student understanding of the nature of science, conceptual under- standing, and scientific literacy in experiment class who is learned by mobile-NOS model of learning significantly higher than control class. Therefore, it can be conclud- ed that the application of the mobile-NOS model of learning can support students' performance on general chemistry learning. 5 Acknowledgement Our gratitude goes to all parties who have provided support until the completion of this research. Special thanks to Indonesian Ministry of Research and Technology DRPM for funding this research. 6 References [1] I. Ismail, S. N. Azizan, and T. Gunasegaran, “Mobile learning in Malaysian universities: Are students ready?” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 17–23, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v10i3.5316 [2] H. Z. Baloch, A. Abdul Rahman, and N. A Ihad, “Mobile Collaborative Informal Learning Design: Study of collaborative effectiveness using Activity Theory,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 34–41, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v6i3.2090 [3] C. L. G. Cabanban, “Development of Mobile Learning Using Android Platform,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 98 – 106, 2013. [4] F. Khaddage, E. Lanham, and W. Zhou, “A Mobile Learning Model for Universities -Re- blending the Current Learning Environment,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 3, no. 0, pp. 18–23, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v3s1.949 [5] N. U. Bhaskar, S. N. Raju, G. Paladugu, and V. Reddy, “Aspects of Content, Context and Adaptation Modeling in Mobile Learning Application Design,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Tech- nol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 29–37, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v7i2.2338 [6] Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan, Astalini, A. Lumbantoruan, and S. C. Samosir, “Mobile learn- ing in higher education for the industrial revolution 4.0: Perception and response of phys- ics practicum,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 4–20, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i09.10948 [7] E. Buckner and P. Kim, “Integrating technology and pedagogy for inquiry-based learning: The Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE),” Prospects, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 99–118, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9269-7 [8] M. Alwraikat, “Smartphones as a new paradigm in higher education overcoming obsta- cles,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 114–135, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i4.6759 [9] H. F. Hanafi and K. Samsudin, “Mobile learning environment system (MLES): the case of Android-based learning application on undergraduates’ learning,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 3, no. 3, 2012. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2012.030311 iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 12, 2020 133 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v10i3.5316 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v6i3.2090 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v3s1.949 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v7i2.2338 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i09.10948 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9269-7 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i4.6759 https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2012.030311 Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... [10] I. Lestari, A. Maksum, and C. Kustandi, “Mobile learning design models for State Univer- sity of Jakarta, Indonesia,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 152–171, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i09.10987 [11] C. Kustandi, D. N. Fadhillah, R. Situmorang, D. S. Prawiladilaga, and S. Hartati, “VR Use in Online Learning for Higher Education in Indonesia,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 14, no. 01, p. 31, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i01.11337 [12] Y. Hanafi, N. Murtadho, M. A. Ikhsan, and T. N. Diyana, “Reinforcing Public University Student’s Worship Education by Developing and Implementing Mobile-Learning Man- agement System in the ADDIE Instructional Design Model,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Tech- nol., vol. 14, no. 02, p. 215, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i02.11380 [13] J. N. V. Cailmag, P. A. G. Miguel, R. S. Conde, and L. B. Aquino, “Ubquitous learning environment using android mobile application,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 119-128., 2014. [14] P. Thinley, J. Reye, and S. Geva, “Tablets (iPad) for M-learning in the context of social constructivism to institute an effective learning environment,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Tech- nol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 16–20, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v8i1.3452 [15] B. Joyce, E. Calhoun, and D. Hopkins, Models of learning, tools for teaching. McGraw- Hill Education (UK), 2008. [16] Y. Khery and Khaeruman, “Pengaruh Context-Rich Problems Berbentuk Multimedia In- teraktif terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains, Sikap Ilmiah, dan Pemahaman Konsep,” Prism. Sains J. Pengkaj. Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Mat. dan IPA IKIP Mataram, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 83–93, 2016. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v4i2.1151 [17] Y. Khery, Pahriah, A. K. Jailani, A. Rizqiana, and N. A. Iswari, “Korelasi Keterampilan Proses Sains dengan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Praktikum Kimia Dasar II (Kinetika Reaksi),” Hydrog. J. Kependidikan Kim., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2019. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v7i1.1686 [18] Najmah, Khaeruman, and Y. Khery, “Korelasi Antara Keterampilan Proses Sains Dengan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Praktikum Sifat Koligatif Larutan,” Hydrog. J. Kependidi- kan Kim., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 171–178, 2014. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v7i1.1686 [19] B. A. Nufida, Y. Khery, Suryati, S. Rahayu, and E. Budiasih, “Correlation amongst under- standing of NOS, conceptual understanding, and science process skill of undergraduate students on general chemistry,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2215, no. April, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0003650 [20] I. Muna, S. Rahayu, and S. Marfu’ah, “Pemahaman Hakikat Sains dan Inkuiri Ilmiah Calon Guru Kimia,” J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kim., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 15-22., 2018. https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v2i22017p015 [21] L. Mason, P. Boscolo, M. Tornatora, and L. Ronconi, “Besides knowledge: a cross- sectional study on the relations between epistemic beliefs, achievement goals, self-beliefs, and achievement in science,” Instr. Sci., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 49–79, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9210-0 [22] F. Cano, “Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through sec- ondary school and their influence on academic performance,” Br. J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 203–221, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904x22683 [23] Y. Khery, B. A. Nufida, Suryati, S. Rahayu, and E. Budiasih, “Gagasan Model Pembelaja- ran Mobile–NOS Untuk Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa. Hydrogen,” Hydrog. J. Kepen- didikan Kim., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–64, 2018. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v6i1.1600 [24] Mark, A. Hofstein, I. Eilks, and R. Bybee, “Societal issues and their importance for con- temporary science education,” Contemp. Sci. Educ., no. September 2010, pp. 5–22, 2011. 134 http://www.i-jim.org https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i09.10987 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i01.11337 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i02.11380 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v8i1.3452 https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v4i2.1151 https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v7i1.1686 https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v7i1.1686 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0003650 https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v2i22017p015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9210-0 https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904x22683 https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v6i1.1600 Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... [25] D. Hudson, “Nature of science in the sience curriculum: origin, development, implications and shifting emphasis,” in International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, New York: Springer, 2014, pp. 911–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 94-007-7654-8_28 [26] N. G. Lederman, J. S. Lederman, and A. Antink, “Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 1, no. 3, 2013. [27] J. Holbrook and M. Rannikmae, “The Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scien- tific Literacy,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1347–1362, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549 [28] C. Gormally, P. Brickman, B. Hallar, and N. Armstrong, “Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence,” Int. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 16, 2009. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216 [29] N. G. Lederman and F. Abd‐El‐Khalick, “Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 665–701, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044 [30] Y. Khery, B. A. Nufida, S. Suryati, S. Rahayu, and M. Aini, “The Influence of Mobile- NOS Model of Learning towards Students Understanding on the Nature of Science,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1464, no. 1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1464/1/012015 [31] S. Azwar, Penyusunan Skala Psikologi, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010. [32] Y. Khery, B. A. Nufida, S. Suryati, S. Rahayu, and E. Budiasih, “Mobile Learning with Oriented Nature of Science (NOS): Does undergraduate school need it?” Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Humanit. Res., vol. 253, no. Aes 2018, pp. 227–232, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2991 /aes-18.2019.54 [33] T. Lin, F. Deng, C. Chai, and C. Tsai, “High school students’ scientific epistemological be- liefs, motivation in learning science, and their relationships: A comparative study within the Chinese culture,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.01.007 [34] P. Nuangchalerm, “Preservice Teacher’S Perception,” The Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 5. pp. 463–467, 2009. [35] I. G. Sudirgayasa, I. W. Suastra, and N. P. Ristiati, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Ber- basis Nature of Science (Nos) Terhadap Kemampuan Aplikasi Konsep Biologi Dan Pema- haman Nos Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Di Sma Negeri 1 Marga,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran IPA Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.23969/biosfer.v1i1.202 [36] O. I. G. A. Dewi, Made Puspa; Putra, Andyana; Negara, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Pdeode Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Siswa Kelas Iv Sd Di Gugus V Kecamatan Seririt,” e- Journal PGSD Univ. Pendidik. Ganesha Mimb. PGSD, vol. 5, no.: 2, pp. 1–10, 2013. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.10.1.61-65 [37] Y. Khery, B. A. Nufida, S. Rahayu, and E. Budiasih, “Mobile Technology On Learning Through Mobile- NOS Model To Enhance Students Awareness Of Epistemology Of Sci- ence,” vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1129–1133, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1567/4/042033 [38] M. S. Topcu, “Elementary Students’ Metacognition and Epistemological Beliefs Consider- ing Science Achievement, Gender and Socioeconomic Status,” Elem. Educ. Online, vol. 8, no. 3, 2009. [39] R. Khishfe and N. Lederman, “Relationship between instructional context and views of na- ture of science,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 939-961., 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601110947 iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 12, 2020 135 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_28 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_28 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549 https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1464/1/012015 https://doi.org/10.2991%0b/aes-18.2019.54 https://doi.org/10.2991%0b/aes-18.2019.54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.01.007 https://doi.org/10.23969/biosfer.v1i1.202 https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.10.1.61-65 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042033 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042033 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601110947 Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... [40] M. UĞRAġ and E. ÇĠL, “Effect of Nature of Science Activities on Nature of Science and Scientific Epistemological Beliefs of Pre-Service Preschool Teachers,” Eurasia Proc. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 4, no. August, pp. 352–356, 2018. [41] J. Eppard, Z. Hojeij, P. Ozdemir-Ayber, M. Rodjan-Helder, and S. Baroudi, “Using mobile learning tools in higher education: A UAE Case,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 51–69, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i11.10823 [42] A. Ramli, I. Ismail, and R. MD. Idrus, “Mobile Learning Via SMS Among Distance Learners: Does Learning Transfer Occur?” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 30–35, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v4i3.1180 [43] A. A. Ziden, M. Rosli, T. Gunasegaran, and S. N. Azizan, “Perceptions and experience in mobile learning via SMS: A case study of distance education students in a Malaysian pub- lic university,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 116–132, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i1.6332 [44] C. Peechapol, J. Na-Songkhla, S. Sujiva, and A. Luangsodsai, “Development of smartphone application based on the theory of planned behaviour to enhance self-efficacy for online learning,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 135–151, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i4.8715 [45] O. F. Marzouki, M. K. Idrissi, and S. Bennani, “Effects of social constructivist mobile learning environments on knowledge acquisition: A meta-analysis,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 18–39, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i1.5982 7 Authors Yusran Khery is senior lecturer in Chemistry Education Department of Applied Science and Technique Faculty of Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Jl. Pemuda 59 A Mataram, Indonesia. He obtained his master degree from Universitas Negeri Ma- lang. His research interest includes: developing model and media of learning, com- puter and internet based learning, STEM based learning, and applied chemistry (email : yusrankhery@ikipmataram.ac.id) Masjudin is senior lecturer in Mathematic Education Department of Applied Sci- ence and Technique Faculty of Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Jl. Pemuda 59 A Mataram, Indonesia. He obtained his master degree from Universitas Negeri Malang. His research interest includes: developing mobile learning media and STEM based learning (email: masjudin@ikipmataram.ac.id) Ahmad Muzaki is senior lecturer in Mathematic Education Department of Ap- plied Science and Technique Faculty of Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Jl. Pemu- da 59 A Mataram, Indonesia. He obtained his Doctor degree from Universitas Pen- didikan Indonesia. His research interest includes: developing mobile learning media and STEM based learning (email: ahmadmuzaki@ikipmataram.ac.id) Baiq Asma Nufida is senior lecturer in Chemistry Education Department of Ap- plied Science and Technique Faculty of Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Jl. Pemu- da 59 A Mataram, Indonesia. She obtained her master degree from Universitas Mata- ram. Her research interest includes: developing model and media of learning, comput- er and internet based learning, STEM based learning, and applied chemistry (email : baiqasmanufida@ikipmataram.ac.id) 136 http://www.i-jim.org https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i11.10823 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v4i3.1180 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i1.6332 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i4.8715 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i1.5982 yusrankhery@ikipmataram.ac.id mailto:masjudin@ikipmataram.ac.id mailto:ahmadmuzaki@ikipmataram.ac.id mailto:baiqasmanufida@ikipmataram.ac.id Paper—Mobile-Nature of Science Model of Learning for Supporting Student Performance on General... Yesi Lesnawati is a teacher and education practitioner of LITPAM, Nusa Tengga- ra Barat, Indonesia. She obtained her Bachelor degree from Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika. Her research interest includes: developing model and media of learning, computer and internet based learning, STEM based learning, and applied chemistry (email: yesilesnawati@gmail.com) Sri Rahayu is Professor of Chemistry Education in Chemistry Department of Mathematic and Science Faculty of Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang 5, Ma- lang, Indonesia. Her research interest includes: scientific literacy development on learning, developing model and media of learning (email: sri.rahayu.fmipa@um.ac.id) Nur Candra Eka Setiawan is lecturer in Chemistry Department of Mathematic and Science Faculty of Universitas Negeri Malang, Jl. Semarang 5, Malang, Indone- sia. He obtained his master degree from Universitas Negeri Malang. His research interest includes: developing model and media of learning, computer and internet based learning, STEM based learning, and applied chemistry (email : nur.setiawan.fmipa@um.ac.id) Article submitted 2020-04-15. Resubmitted 2020-05-23. Final acceptance 2020-05-25. Final version published as submitted by the authors. iJIM ‒ Vol. 14, No. 12, 2020 137 mailto:yesilesnawati@gmail.com sri.rahayu.fmipa@um.ac.id mailto:nur.setiawan.fmipa@um.ac.id