International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) – eISSN: 1865-7923 – Vol. 15, No. 12, 2021 Short Paper—Smartphones and Mobile Apps: Case Study on Usage Behavior of Elementary School... Smartphones and Mobile Apps: Case Study on Usage Behavior of Elementary School Students Insights from a Rural Area in Northern Germany https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i12.22565 Atilla Wohllebe (), Dirk-Siegfried Hübner, Uwe Radtke MATE Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kaposvár, Hungary atilla.wohllebe@gmail.com Arabel Wohllebe Europa-Universität Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany Abstract—With digitization and the spread of smartphones in many areas of life, mobile devices have also become increasingly relevant in education. While comprehensive research exists especially for smartphone use among teenagers and students, the findings for elementary school students are limited. Based on a survey, this case study provides exploratory insights into the smartphone usage behavior of elementary school students in a rural region in northern Germany. The responses of 33 students in grades 3 and 4 (ages 8 to 10) show that many students already own a smartphone at this age and use it daily, sometimes for several hours, especially for gaming and media consumption. The influence of owning an own smartphone on usage and leisure activities is reviewed. School use is of little relevance among the elementary school students surveyed. Keywords—Elementary School, Mobile Apps, Smartphones, Education 1 Introduction Increasing digitization is changing many areas and industries and, in addition to politics, public administration, medicine and retail, is also affecting education [1]–[4]. This is especially true for smartphones: as early as 2011, researchers predicted for the United States of America that mobile learning devices would soon be used perma- nently and by every student [5]. Mobile apps, which are also one of the most im- portant functions of smartphones in other areas such as retail or medicine, play a spe- cial role here and allow a wide range of application possibilities [6]–[9]. Parents in particular have a strong interest in making mobile technologies available to their children for learning, also because they can better participate in their chil- dren's learning process this way [10], [11]. Numerous studies show that smartphones are used primarily as a communication tool (i.e., for chatting) among children and young people, but also among students 184 http://www.i-jim.org https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i12.22565 mailto:atilla.wohllebe@gmail.com mailto:atilla.wohllebe@gmail.com Short Paper—Smartphones and Mobile Apps: Case Study on Usage Behavior of Elementary School... [12]–[14]. Thus, chat groups on WhatsApp can not only serve communication, but also strengthen the community and collaboration [14]. Also, research describes the use of apps and especially chat apps for language learning [15], [16]. Gamification approaches can be used to learn mathematics [17]. It should be emphasized that smartphone use is changing the leisure activities of children and young people [18], [19, p. 44]. The "KIM Study" of around 1,200 chil- dren and young people between the ages of 6 and 13 from all over Germany shows that smartphones and the Internet are now the most important interest after friends and sports. In particular, mobile devices are used for messaging and telephoning, followed by the Internet and games. Despite the high level of interest in smartphones and the Internet: Watching TV, meeting friends, learning, playing indoors and outdoors, own family and sports are still more relevant as leisure activities [18]. The aim of this case study is to provide insights into the smartphone usage behav- ior of elementary school students and thus supplement existing knowledge. To this end, a total of 33 students in the third and fourth grades of an elementary school in a rural area in northern Germany are surveyed about how they use smartphones - both in their leisure and for school purposes - and they do in their leisure. First, the materi- al and methodology are discussed. For the most part, the survey results are presented descriptively. Subsequently, the results are discussed against the background of exist- ing findings from the field of education in the broadest sense. 2 Material & Methods The case study is based on a survey conducted at an elementary school in a rural region in Schleswig-Holstein in northern Germany. Students in grades 3 and 4 were surveyed. In addition to sociodemographic data, the questionnaire asks about two topics: smartphone use, especially in school contexts, and leisure time activities. With regard to smartphone use, the questionnaire asks about frequency of use (De- viceUse), ownership of a smartphone (OwnDevice), use cases (DeviceUsePlay, De- viceUseChat, ...) and enjoyment of device use (DeviceLikeUse). For use in a school context, frequency of use (DeviceUseSchool) and app use (Ap- pUseLearn, AppUseCalc, ...) are asked. Related to leisure time activities, the questionnaire asks about leisure time activi- ties (DoSports, DoMusic, ...). A pre-test of the questionnaire with a small group of students reveals that the pre- viously proposed scales (Likert scale from 1 to 5) are often perceived as too compli- cated. The students state that they are partly overwhelmed by distinctions such as "frequently" and "very frequently". Therefore, especially the questions about use cases and leisure activities are changed to binary scales (0 = rather rarely, 1 = rather often). Table 1 shows the scales of the queried items. iJIM ‒ Vol. 15, No. 12, 2021 185 Short Paper—Smartphones and Mobile Apps: Case Study on Usage Behavior of Elementary School... Table 1. Scale used per questionnaire item Item(s) Scale Gender Binary (1 = male) DeviceUse Ordinal (1 = never, 6 = several hours daily) OwnDevice Binary (1 = true) DeviceUsePlay, DeviceUseChat, (…) Binary (0 = rather rarely, 1 = rather often) DeviceUseSchool Interval (1 = very rarely, 6 = very often) AppUseLearn, AppUseCalc, (…) Binary (1 = true) DeviceLikeUse Interval (1 = not at all, 5 = very much) DoSports, DoMusic, (…) Binary (0 = rather rarely, 1 = rather often) The questionnaire is completed jointly with the students of two classes (grades 3 and 4), each in a large group, generating 33 usable responses. 3 Results The survey yields responses from 17 girls and 16 boys. The majority of the stu- dents are nine years old at the time of the survey (cf. tbl. 2). Table 2. Participant’s distribution of gender and age Age Female Male Total 8 3 4 7 9 6 11 17 10 8 1 9 Total 17 16 33 In the third grade, 15 responses are collected, and in the fourth grade, 18. Of the students surveyed, 22 (67%) already own their own mobile device. Fig. 1. Distribution of usage frequency 186 http://www.i-jim.org Short Paper—Smartphones and Mobile Apps: Case Study on Usage Behavior of Elementary School... Fig. 1 shows that the majority of students use smartphones rather frequently, i.e., according to their own statements, in some cases for several hours a day. No student states that they never use a smartphone. It is striking that the frequency of use differs between students who own a smartphone (M = 5.04, SD = 1.13) and those who do not own a smartphone (M = 3.27, SD = 1.10); t(31) = -4.27, p = .0002. If a student owns a smartphone, the frequency of use increases significantly (β = 1.77, t = 4.27, p = .000). Fig. 2. Distribution of enjoying usage Despite the high prevalence of smartphones among students, students do not seem to experience explicit great pleasure in using smartphones (cf. fig. 2). Fig. 3. Device usage across different activities (Except school) iJIM ‒ Vol. 15, No. 12, 2021 187 Short Paper—Smartphones and Mobile Apps: Case Study on Usage Behavior of Elementary School... In terms of use cases, the survey data show that smartphones are used by elemen- tary school students in particular for playing games and consuming media (videos and music). Device use for chatting and especially for learning appears to be of little rele- vance among young students (cf. fig. 3). Fig. 4. Activities in leisure In terms of leisure activities (away from the smartphone), most respondents said they played sports and met friends. Playing a musical instrument seems to be the least relevant among students (cf. fig. 4). Table 3. Correlation of own device and leisure activities Activity OwnDevice Sports Music WatchTV PlayOut Meet Friends OwnDevice 1.0000 Sports -0.0466 1.0000 MusicInstrument -0.3730 0.0043 1.0000 WatchTV 0.0429 -0.2839 -0.2439 1.0000 PlayOut -0.1291 0.2047 0.0602 -0.3985 1.0000 MeetFriends -0.0000 0.1869 -0.0498 -0.1490 0.4370 1.0000 If a student owns his or her own smartphone, this has hardly any impact on leisure activities (compared to not owning a smartphone) (cf. tbl. 3). Playing a musical in- strument is an exception. Here, owning one's own smartphone has a significant nega- tive effect (β = -.363, t = -2.24, p = .033). 188 http://www.i-jim.org Short Paper—Smartphones and Mobile Apps: Case Study on Usage Behavior of Elementary School... Fig. 5. Distribution of device usage for school With regard to school use, the survey data show that most students tend not to use their smartphones for school (cf. fig. 5). There is no significant difference between the groups "own device" (M = 1.95, SD = 2.10) and "no own device" (M = 1.54, SD = 1.92); t(31) = -0.54, p = .5919. Learning apps (e.g., vocabulary or knowledge quizzes) or the calculator are most likely to be used for school on the smartphone (cf. fig. 6). Fig. 6. Usage of school-related apps 4 Summary and Conclusion The aim of this case study was to provide insights into the smartphone usage be- havior of elementary school students using the example of a rural region in northern Germany. To this end, an explorative survey was conducted on how the surveyed iJIM ‒ Vol. 15, No. 12, 2021 189 Short Paper—Smartphones and Mobile Apps: Case Study on Usage Behavior of Elementary School... students use the smartphone in general and in the school context in particular, and how they spend their free time. The data collected was processed descriptively and related to existing findings. In summary, the results show that even children of primary school age use smartphones intensively. This use is particularly favored by owning their own device. At 67 percent, children in the relatively small sample presented here are significantly more likely to own their own device compared to the Germany-wide KIM study from 2018 (51 percent) [18]. When it comes to smartphone use, the results of the survey correspond to those of the KIM study. Smartphones are mainly used for games, music and videos [18]. Fre- quent use for gaming opens up opportunities for learning with gamification approach- es for elementary school students as well [17]. Less relevant to elementary school students is the use of chatting, which is the main use case for university students in Korea, for example [11], [13]. For the use of smartphones as a (supportive) learning tool in elementary school, this means that chatting is probably less suitable as a learn- ing method [15], [16]. In terms of leisure activities, the results of the present case study fit with previous findings that (despite high smartphone use) sports and friends are still of highest rele- vance for the children [18], [20]. However, owning a smartphone is negatively associ- ated with playing a musical instrument. The fears of some educators seem to be con- firmed here [21]. However, due to the small sample, a larger scale study should be undertaken in this regard to test the statement. With regard to school use, some researchers had predicted that smartphones would become an integral part of everyday educational school life. At least for the sample presented here from a rural region in the north of Germany, this has not yet occurred [5]. So far, elementary school students have used smartphones only sporadically, especially with learning and calculator apps. Overall, the survey shows a high relevance of the smartphone for elementary school students in their leisure time activities, without "analog" activities such as meeting friends or playing sports seeming to take a back seat. Nevertheless, the pro- portion of smartphone use at school plays only a secondary role among the respond- ents. 5 References [1] R. Deckert, Digitalisierung, Politik und Verwaltung: Gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen und strategische Steuerung. Gabler Verlag, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658- 30818-6 [2] R. Deckert and A. Wohllebe, Digitalisierung und Einzelhandel: Taktiken und Technologien, Praxisbeispiele und Herausforderungen, 1st ed. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33090-3_5 [3] D. May, K. Wold, and S. Moore, “Using interactive online role-playing simulations to de- velop global competency and to prepare engineering students for a globalised world,” Eu- ropean Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 522–545, Sep. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.960511 . 190 http://www.i-jim.org https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30818-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30818-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33090-3_5 https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.960511 Short Paper—Smartphones and Mobile Apps: Case Study on Usage Behavior of Elementary School... [4] E. Diez, “Managing A Veterinary Practice: A Guide to Organizational Culture in Veteri- nary Practice,” IJARBM, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–26, Dec. 2020, https://doi.org/10. 51137/ijarbm.2020.1.1.2 [5] C. Norris, A. Hossain, and E. Soloway, “Using smartphones as essential tools for learning: A call to place schools on the right side of the 21st century,” Educational Technology, vol. 51, pp. 18–25, Jan. 2011. [6] S. Papadakis, M. Kalogiannakis, and N. Zaranis, “Educational apps from the Android Google Play for Greek preschoolers: A systematic review,” Computers & Education, vol. 116, pp. 139–160, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.007 [7] A. Wohllebe, P. Dirrler, and S. Podruzsik, “Mobile Apps in Retail: Determinants of Con- sumer Acceptance – a Systematic Review,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 153–164, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i20.18273 [8] D. McGookin, K. Tahiroğlu, T. Vaittinen, M. Kytö, B. Monastero, and J. C. Vasquez, “In- vestigating tangential access for location-based digital cultural heritage applications,” In- ternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 122, pp. 196–210, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.09.009 [9] F. Ross, “Hearing Aid Accompanying Smartphone Apps in Hearing Healthcare. A Sys- tematic Review,” Applied Medical Informatics, vol. 42, no. 4, Nov. 2020, [Online]. Avail- able: https://ami.info.umfcluj.ro/index.php/AMI/article/view/792 [10] S. Papadakis, N. Zaranis, and M. Kalogiannakis, “Parental involvement and attitudes to- wards young Greek children’s mobile usage,” International Journal of Child-Computer In- teraction, vol. 22, p. 100144, Dec. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.100144 [11] W. Parnell and J. Bartlett, “iDocument: How Smartphones and Tablets are Changing Doc- umentation in Preschool and Primary Classrooms,” Young Children, May 2012, [Online]. Available: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/edu_fac/13. [12] N. Sang-Zo, “Evaluation of University Students’ Utilization of Smartphone,” International Journal of Smart Home, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 175–182, Jul. 2013, [Online]. Available: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.390.9904&rep=rep1&type=pdf. [13] J. Otto, “Mit dem Handy always on. Mobile Kommunikationskultur bei Kindern und Jugendlichen,” in Lieben, Liken, Spielen: Digitale Kommunikation und Selbstdarstellung Jugendlicher heute - Medienpädagogische Konzepte und Perspektiven, New Edition., J. Lauffer and R. Röllecke, Eds. München: kopaed, 2014, pp. 67–74. [14] D. Bouhnik and M. Deshen, “WhatsApp Goes to School: Mobile Instant Messaging be- tween Teachers and Students,” JITE:Research, vol. 13, pp. 217–231, 2014, https://doi.org/10.28945/2051 . [15] Z. Shi, G. Luo, and L. He, “Mobile-assisted Language Learning Using WeChat Instant Messaging,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 12, no. 02, p. 16, Feb. 2017, https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i02.6681 . [16] S. Zhang, “Mobile English Learning: An Empirical Study on an APP, English Fun Dub- bing,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 11, no. 12, p. 4, Dec. 2016, https://doi.org/10. 3991/ijet.v11i12.6314. [17] M. A. Alkhateeb, “Effect of Mobile Gaming on Mathematical Achievement among 4th Graders,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 14, no. 07, p. 4, Apr. 2019, https://doi.org/ 10.3991/ijet.v14i07.10315 . [18] Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, “KIM-Studie 2018.” Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, 2018, Accessed: Feb. 27, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mpfs.de/studien/kim-studie/2018/. [19] H. Schaumburg and D. Prasse, Medien und Schule: Theorie - Forschung - Praxis, 1. Edition. Bad Heilbrunn: UTB GmbH, 2018. iJIM ‒ Vol. 15, No. 12, 2021 191 https://doi.org/10.51137/ijarbm.2020.1.1.2 https://doi.org/10.51137/ijarbm.2020.1.1.2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.007 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i20.18273 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.09.009 https://ami.info.umfcluj.ro/index.php/AMI/article/view/792 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.100144 https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/edu_fac/13 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.390.9904&rep=rep1&type=pdf https://doi.org/10.28945/2051 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i02.6681 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i12.6314 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i12.6314 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.10315 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.10315 https://www.mpfs.de/studien/kim-studie/2018/ Short Paper—Smartphones and Mobile Apps: Case Study on Usage Behavior of Elementary School... [20] A. Wohllebe, “Smartphone/Tablet-Nutzung im Grundschulalter,” Europa-Universität Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany, 2020. [21] G. Lembke, Im digitalen Hamsterrad. Ein Plädoyer für den gesunden Umgang mit Smartphone & Co., 1. Aufl. Edition. Heidelberg: medhochzwei Verlag, 2016. 6 Authors Atilla Wohllebe works in retail and e-commerce. He helps companies to meet the challenges of digitization both strategically and technologically. He holds a M. Sc. in E-Commerce from Wedel University of Applied Sciences, Germany, and is currently a Ph. D. student at MATE Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences – Kaposvár Campus, Hungary. His research topics include mobile apps & digital mar- keting, e-commerce & retail, and agile working methods. Arabel Wohllebe studied Educational Sciences with a focus on German Studies and Textiles & Fashion. She holds a Master of Education from Europa-Universität Flensburg and is a prospective elementary school teacher in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. She lives in Flensburg in the north of Germany. Dirk-Siegfried Hübner is the owner of an energy consulting company and spe- cializes in bakeries. At the same time, he is a doctoral student at MATE Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences – Kaposvár Campus. He is dedicated to research in the field of energy management and sustainability. Dirk holds an M.A. in Project Management from Ludwigshafen University of Applied Sciences and lives in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. Uwe Radtke is a Development Architect at SAP. He lives and works in Dresden, Saxony, and is currently completing a part-time PhD program at MATE Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences – Kaposvár Campus, Hungary. Uwe stud- ied Business Informatics in Zwickau, Germany. Article submitted 2021-03-10. Resubmitted 2021-04-13. Final acceptance 2021-04-13. Final version published as submitted by the authors. 192 http://www.i-jim.org