International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) – eISSN: 1865-7923 – Vol. 16, No. 02, 2022


Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and 
Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian Primary School

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i02.27677

Liew Chuang Tong1, Mohd Shafie Rosli2(*), Nor Shela Saleh3
1Ministry of Education, Malaysia

2School of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
3Department of Social Sciences, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia

shafierosli@utm.my

Abstract—Learning in the 21st century emphasize on development of higher 
order thinking skills such as problem-solving skills with substantial highlight 
was given toward student-centred approach. Digital game and problem-solving 
activities are an ideal combination of student-centred approach which facilitate 
active participation for students to practice and develop their thinking skills. This 
study was conducted to investigate the effect and the process of using digital 
game and problem-based learning skills to enhance higher order thinking skills 
in primary school student in the context of Malaysia. A preliminary study was 
conducted to 50 samples to collect data about their current higher order thinking 
skills level. The result shows samples are good in identify problem and solu-
tion, but weak in decision making and reasoning. To study the effect of digital 
game and problem-based learning combined in enhancing higher order thinking 
skills, a pre-test and post-test was conducted to 35 samples before and after three 
sessions of digital game problem-based learning section. After running a paired 
sample t test upon the pre-test and post-test, the result show that the combination 
of digital game and problem-based learning have significant effect in enhancing 
higher order thinking skills. To understand samples’ learning process, reflection 
journal was used after each learning section and an interview was conducted 
following the post-test. The data gathered indicate samples do enjoy learning 
with digital games and problem-based learning, and they agreed the approaches 
help them to learn better. However, they expected for more exciting games 
and group activities in the future. This study opens a gateway for developing 
student-centred and fun learning approach that beneficial toward student’s higher 
order thinking skills.

Keywords—problem-based learning, digital game, higher order thinking skills

1 Introduction

Malaysia had introduced her National Education Blueprint that had laid founda-
tion for the nation educational development for 2013 until 2025. The blueprint had 
highlighted six aspirations as a manoeuvre to develop human resources for Malaysia to 
compete at global stage in term of innovation and economic competitiveness. One of 

iJIM ‒ Vol. 16, No. 02, 2022 101

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i02.27677
mailto:shafierosli@utm.my


Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

the upmost goals of this blueprint is to improve the mastery of Higher Order Thinking 
Skills (HOTS) among students nation-wide. In the context of Malaysian schooling 
system, HOTS is defined as student ability to apply knowledge, skill, and value in 
reasoning, reflecting, and solving problem, making decision, and innovating a new 
idea [1].

Multiple approaches were introduced to improve HOTS in education. Gaming 
seems like a promising medium to bridge the curriculum, content, and persuasive ele-
ment of the technology into a unified medium of effective education. Throughout the 
years, studies had been done upon the effect of gaming on academic achievement [2], 
psychological health [3], educational outcome [4], mathematics [5] [6], science [7] [8], 
and language [9]. The integration of game into teaching and learning of various sub-
jects had been discussed for many years and lately it becomes a new practice among 
teachers. This led to a new question, how effective is game-based learning in promoting 
HOTS? Therefore, the researchers are looking forward to study the effect of digital 
game-based learning in promoting HOTS among primary school students.

In education, beside the learning approach, a well devised pedagogical approach is 
needed in safeguarding that the engagement will lead to productive knowledge con-
struction. For years, problem-based learning was highlighted as an effective approach 
that suit the dynamic needs of 21st century education. The literatures show the effect of 
problem-based learning on creative thinking [10], mathematical literacy [11], metacog-
nition [12], analytical thinking [13], mathematical problem solving [14], and science 
problem solving skills [15]. However, what is the effect of problem-based learning in 
promoting HOTS? Therefore, this study is going to study the effect of digital game-
based learning and problem-based learning combination toward sample’s HOTS.

2 Literature review

Bloom had come up with the concept of Bloom’s Taxonomy which divided learning 
outcome into six categories which range from lower thinking skills to higher thinking 
skills. The taxonomy was later revised by [16]. As digital age of education had come 
into reality, HOTS becoming more imperative. It is not only in Malaysia, but HOTS 
had become mainstream in the neighbouring Singapore with daily classroom and out of 
the classroom activities are centred on instilling HOTS into learning [17]. The similar 
development is also taking place in the neighbouring Indonesia. HOTS exists in nexus 
with critical thinking and problem-solving skills. However, the main concern till today 
is how to enhance HOTS?

According to [18] HOTS skills are composed of critical thinking, creative think-
ing and problem solving. HOTS process is a mental activity that solve complex 
non-structural problem. On the other hand, Bloom stated three domains for HOTS 
which are cognitive, affective, and psychomotor [19]. The learning and teaching pro-
cess of HOTS will be more effective if it follows the steps from prerequisite, bridge 
to HOTS [19]. Educators need to act as facilitators to facilitate students to bridge that 
knowledge. These scaffolding steps help to lighten the cognitive burden of learners and 
provide an appropriate learning challenge to learners [20].

102 http://www.i-jim.org



Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

The benefits of applying HOTS in teaching and learning are being portrayed by 
various of studies such as enhancing learning abilities, motivate students and speed up 
learning effectively [19]. Sadly, the teaching trend is still skew toward the traditional 
rote memorizing method in the 21st century. Educators prefer to practice knowledge 
memorization more than thinking and applying [21]. [22] also review the same problem 
in the teaching of chemistry as chemistry educators’ tents to teach facts and skills com-
pare to instilling HOTS into teaching and learning process with practical or projects. 
Therefore, most students only possess lower thinking skills.

[23] defined digital games as a planned system with rules which equip with variable 
and quantifiable outcome where player will pay effort to influence the outcome and 
have attachment toward the outcome gained. [24] concluded that the reasons why dig-
ital games are gaining trust are its ability to motivate learner in embarking and staying 
engage with learning as well as it allows certain learning paradigm being implemented 
with its attributes.

Digital game had been proven to bring ample of benefits to the world of education 
by stimulating interest and motivation [25]. Digital games have proved as improving 
student’s retention of information [26]. The digital role-playing was found to be an 
influential factor in learning performance, self-efficacy, and motivation of its users [27]. 
However, it still prone toward some drawbacks such as lack of educational focus, the 
need of gadget and ineffective time management. Thus, study on how digital game best 
benefits the education ecosystem seems needed.

3 Problem statement

There are still certain schools that are still unable to achieve good or distinguish 
achievement in HOTS-based assessment. The ministry is currently put intensive efforts 
and initiatives to facilitate these schools to achieve higher performance in HOTS. The 
educational blueprint set had given substantial focus for HOTS in national standardized 
examination in Malaysia such as UPSR (primary school) and SPM (secondary school). 
Yet, it is not an easy to improve HOTS achievement at a very large scale as a method-
ology and approach that help to promote and nurture HOTS among students are largely 
still under study.

Digital game had shown positive and great feedback in education. It is also a prom-
ising approach. Therefore, digital game is one of the prospective solutions that might 
improve thinking skills among the learners in Malaysia. Even though digital game is a 
promising solution, it still prone toward disadvantages in learning.

Study by [28] reported that students might focus on the fun elements of games than 
learning that eventually reduced the effectiveness of the learning process. It is relatively 
difficult to balance the benefit and its advantages. The same goes to problem-based 
learning as if its construction of knowledge was made without robust practical and 
theoretical foundation which render ineffective learning [29]. [30] had reported several 
weaknesses of problem-based learning such as time inadequacy, loaded curriculum and 
difference in implementation.

iJIM ‒ Vol. 16, No. 02, 2022 103



Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

For this study, researcher wishes to identify the effect of using digital game integrat-
ing with problem-based learning approach to help enhancing student’s ability to apply 
problem solving skills which required HOTS. Students are expected to be able to come 
up with better and more effective solution with the help of digital games and prob-
lem-based learning approach. In conclusion, the problems stated led to the construction 
of the following research objectives:

1. To study the current level of HOTS among students
2. To study the effect of the combination of problem-based learning and digital game 

toward HOTS among students
3. To study the learning process of HOTS construction during the engagement with 

problem-based learning and digital game

4 Methodology

This research is quasi-experimental research due to the limitation of access to 
samples and the intact nature of classroom in a formal education setting globally. Since 
the study is studying about the effect of digital games integrating of problem-based 
learning in enhancing HOTS, quasi-experimental will provide strong evidence and sup-
port toward the impact of the related pedagogies.

This research was conducted in two phases which are the preliminary study and 
the experimental treatment. The samples are primary school students who are learn-
ing English, and English was made as the subject domain for this intervention. In 
the preliminary study, the current HOTS level of the samples was identified. During 
the experimental treatment, new samples had engaged the designed treatment for 
four weeks. The treatment was around 10 hours in total with pre-test and post-test 
in between of the treatment sessions. The preliminary had sampled 50 samples using 
random sampling technique and another 35 were samples for the experimental treat-
ment using cluster random sampling technique. Selection of school was made using 
the non-probability sampling method of purposive sampling. Sampling is bound to the 
willingness of the school and samples to get involve into the research voluntarily as 
well as the familiarity of the samples with digital technologies either in classroom or 
out of classroom context.

The instruments are preliminary test, pre-test, post-test, and journal reflection. The 
preliminary test, pre-test and post-test instrument and its marking rubric were devel-
oped based on the discussion of the researchers with the panel of experts from schools 
and university in Malaysia. These are an open-ended question engineered to exhibit 
HOTS mastery by samples with maximum mark of 12 with total number of 3 ques-
tions. There are three pictures in the test for the respondents to respond to. In each 
picture, there are different situation that required the respondents to analyze and think 
critically to find the needed answer. For each picture, there were three questions that 
respondents need to answer. Samples are required to answer each question in a short 
paragraph written by them. No words limit for each paragraph given. The grammar and 
spelling mistakes were not penalized by the marker. The instruments were marked by 
two experts with a high inter-rater value for each answer. To ensure the validity of the 

104 http://www.i-jim.org



Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

tests, researchers had consult with 3 English teachers from primary school for purpose 
of face and content validity. The reliability of these instruments was tested with 15 
samples that shows its reliability at the value of 0.6.

Reflection journal was distributed to the samples using Google Form. It focuses on 
the reflection of learning process during the engagement with the treatment sessions. 
Samples are allowed to write their reflection journal after each session of treatment 
or during and after the end of school session. The reflection journal consists of two 
questions as guidance for samples to write their reflection which are how they learn 
individually and with peers during the treatment sessions.

5 Result

The result from preliminary study shows that for the first question the mode was 
at 11. The skewness of the histogram as in Figure 1 is toward the middle with higher 
score at right that shows samples able to answer the question well. It concluded that 
samples could identify the problem and solution to the complex situation given.

Fig. 1. Histogram for preliminary study

The full mark for the question 2 is 7 marks. This question required samples to make 
decision for choose the solution they prefer the most to handle the problems they are 
facing in the situation given. From Figure 1, it shows that most of the samples’ scores 

iJIM ‒ Vol. 16, No. 02, 2022 105



Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

are gather around the mode and the medium of the marks with is 4 marks. Most of the 
samples acquired marks that close to the medium mark which is 4 and very few sam-
ples get the very low marks and very high marks. This indicated that the ability among 
samples in decision making is average; there are no extreme good or bad among their 
ability in decision making. The average performance of samples in decision making 
also reflected their level of applying higher order thinking skills such as critical and 
creative thinking skills, as well as their problem-solving skills.

In question 3, samples are required to give reason for the answer they choose in 
question 2. Samples need to come up with more than 1 reasonable and rational reason 
to explain their decision in question 2. According to [31], the fundamental skill for 
thinking is by learning to reason. According to the definition, if samples able to explain 
and reason well about the choice they made, they are showing high level thinking skill 
with good quality which able to benefit them.

However, samples in this test do not illustrate thinking process with good quality. 
The full marks for question 3 are 11 marks. The highest marks samples able to obtain 
is only 9 marks and only 1 person obtain 9 marks. From Figure 1, most of the samples 
obtain very low marks and the distribution of the marks is skewed toward the low 
marks. The mode of the marks obtain by samples is 1 mark. Samples perform poorly 
in question 3. To reason is to make connection between knowledge and information by 
using analysis, synthesis, and evaluation skills [32]. Therefore, it is not an easy task. As 
[16] had suggested, analysis, synthesis and evaluation are HOTS, it infers that samples 
not able to make reasoning based on the decision they made and not able to achieve the 
desired HOTS yet.

The result of pre-test and post-test of samples engaged with the treatment is as in 
Table 1. The pre-test and post-test result of the 35 samples were compared using paired 
sample t-test. The significant level, α is set at 95% with the value α = 0.05 for this paired 
sample t-test. The result was separated based on questions in the pre-test and post-test 
to gain better insight into the effect of treatment to samples’ HOTS.

Table 1. Paired sample t-test for pre-test and post-test

Mean SD t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Question 1: pre-post –0.60 1.17 –3.04 34 .005

Question 2: pre-post –1.37 1.06 –7.66 34 .000

Question 3: pre-post –6.09 1.90 –6.74 34 .000

Based on the table above, the p value for the comparison of pre-test and post-test 
for question 1 is 0.005 which is less than the α value set at 0.05. Therefore, there is a 
significant different between the result of pre-test and post-test. For questions 2 and 3, 
the p value is 0.000 which are also below the α value which is 0.05. Therefore, there is 
a significant different between the result of pre-test and post-test for these two questions 
as well. As in Table 1, the three questions are having mean with negative value that 
shows samples’ score are higher in the post-test rather that pre-test. It clearly shows that 
the treatment is giving positive effect to the HOTS level of samples.

The data from the journal were analysed qualitatively using thematic analysis. The 
themes produced are as in Figure 2.

106 http://www.i-jim.org



Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

Fig. 2. Theme of the reflection journal

Based on the reflection journal, samples respond toward the digital game prob-
lem-based learning section is positive after the first learning section. They feel that 
digital game problem-based learning is fun and interesting compared to normal teach-
ing and learning section in the classroom. They say they will no longer be boring in 
learning and studying section if learning is carried out in digital game problem-based 
learning section.

The journal from the second treatment session divided in to both positive and neg-
ative feedback from the samples. The most repeated theme in the samples’ journal is 
still fun and interesting. Most of them still engage and intrigue by the digital game inte-
grates with problem solving approach. Moreover, the request for longer gaming section 
and less working section is also repeated frequently in the journal for second learning 
section with digital game problem-based learning. The negative feedback also repeated 
in samples’ journal. One of the most repeated negative feedback is the game start to 
bore them. However, this feedback was only repeated in a few of the samples only.

Another negative feedback from the samples is about playing the game individually 
and asking samples to write down solution for problem individually. The statement if 
“not wanting individual works” is repeated numbers of time in samples’ journal. They 
are statement like “I feel happier play and write with friends”, “I hope teacher allow us 
to play and share answer” and “I don’t want to play and write alone”. Samples request 
for more group work and group play time is based on the desire of group learning goal.

In the further reflection journal, the feedback from samples’ journal is mostly nega-
tive. There is still repetition on the statement related on fun and interesting among sam-
ples. However, the repetition on helping in learning does not appear in samples’ journal 
for the third section of learning. The request for group playing time and complete task 
in group also appear in the third digital game problem-based learning section. Besides, 
many samples also mention that the section with digital game started to bore them. The 
reason for samples become bored is clearer because repetition on request for different 
kind of game in samples’ journal. Samples also request on game from different genre. 
One of the samples stated that “I like playing game in class, but I am boring playing 

iJIM ‒ Vol. 16, No. 02, 2022 107



Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

the same game.” Another sample also stated that “I wish to play others game, the same 
game boring me.” Samples’ interested span cannot withstand the same game for the 
three sections. Another negative feedback is samples start to show concern that too 
much playing may cause them to divert from the learning and become less concentrate 
in learning.

6 Discussion

To understand the current level of HOTS among primary school students, the data 
was gathered to indicate their thinking skills level by using a test instrument. The data 
turn out to show that samples have their strong aspect in HOTS and weak aspect in 
HOTS too. [33] run a study to try to find out the factor that influence primary school 
students in HOTS. The result of their research does show different between the boys 
and the girls where female students preform slightly better that the male. However, 
after testing the different using Mann-Whitney U test, they found out the differences 
is not significant enough to conclude that gender does affect the differences in primary 
school students’ HOTS [33].

There are two studies that found out that the learning environment does affect the 
decision-making skills of pupils in the learning process. [34] carried out a study by 
using questionnaire and simulated-patient-encounter situation to test on medical stu-
dents’ level of decision making. After gather the result from different situation, he tested 
the result by using ANOVA test and it turn out that when medical students were place 
in different scenario and environment, the decision-making level and process will be 
different. The next study is done with teacher trainee in learning democracy approach 
in classroom. When [35] carry out the case study for the democracy education, he does 
aim to collect data about learners’ decision-making process. Decision-making would be 
better if participants could be facilitated by the facilitator carefully [35]. This indicate 
that decision making need facilitation and scaffold.

[21] tried to find out the relationship between different learning style and techni-
cal student’s HOTS. They reported that reasoning is the among the weakest perceived 
HOTS based on the data collected from 375 technical students using Marzano HOTS. 
After running MANOVA test, they conclude that learning style will affect learners’ 
level of HOTS such as their perceived level of reasoning.

Recent studies shown that digital game is effective in developing 21st century skills 
including HOTS either in Malaysia or out of Malaysia [36]. Besides, digital games 
also influence attitude toward learning in positive magnitude and it would affect their 
learning performance [37], [38]. There is research support that digital game promote 
creativity [39] and problem solving [40].

Research about the effect of digital games in improving HOTS are extensive [37]. 
The positive impact of digital games is overwhelming such as for students with learning 
difficulties [41], increase competitive growth [42] and fostering knowledge, attitudes, 
and skills of the students with instructor guidance [43]. Therefore, future research on 
the impact of digital games toward learning and education is highly suggested.

We suggest that learning using the unique combination of problem-based learning 
and digital game still have room for improvements. For examples, to strengthen the 

108 http://www.i-jim.org



Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

positive effects of this intervention, teachers and educational policy makers should look 
into how the combination of these approaches should be unified to gain a fun and joyful 
learning session without compromising the learning elements. The second improve-
ment is that, teachers could use a variety of games to support the problem-based learn-
ing. As we found that the samples feel bored using the same game repeatedly. Finally, 
we would suggest that teachers or instructors to actively facilitate the digital games 
problem-based learning so that it would enable the students to make better decision that 
might impact their learning outcomes and success.

7 Conclusion

Studying the mechanism of improving HOTS using digital games is not a new topic. 
However, an effective mechanism of how it can be done is still puzzling around. This 
research had tried the combination of digital games and problem-based learning as a 
new mechanism of enhancing HOTS. This study has proven that the integration of 
these two approaches is effective in enhancing primary school students’ HOTS. Sam-
ples shows good perspective toward the application and generate a dynamic process of 
learning. Hopefully, more future studies can be done upon the integration of these two 
approaches to help foster HOTS among our young learners.

8 Acknowledgment

Authors would like to thank Ministry of Education and Universiti Teknologi 
Malaysia for sponsoring this paper through UTM Fundamental Research (UTMFR) 
grant with Project Number Q.J130000.2553.21H23.

9 References

 [1] Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015–2025 (Higher 
Education). www.moe.gov.my 

 [2] Anthony, W. L., Zhu, Y., & Nower, L. (2021). The relationship of interactive technology use 
for entertainment and school performance and engagement: Evidence from a longitudinal 
study in a nationally representative sample of middle school students in China. Computers 
in Human Behavior, 122, 106846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106846

 [3] Mukherjee, S., Mallick, A., & Biswas, S. (2021). Effects of massively multiplayer online 
role-playing games on psychological health and inter-personal relationships of the male 
youth: A cross-sectional study in sub-urban Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Anthropological 
Review, 84(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021-0010

 [4] Adžić, S., Al-Mansour, J., Naqvi, H., & Stambolić, S. (2021). The impact of video games 
on Students’ educational outcomes. Entertainment Computing, 38, 100412. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100412

 [5] Fraga-Varela, F., Vila-Couñago, E., & Rodríguez-Groba, A. (2021). Serious Games and 
Mathematical Fluency: A Study from the Gender Perspective in Primary Education. Sus-
tainability, 13(12), 6586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126586

iJIM ‒ Vol. 16, No. 02, 2022 109

http://www.moe.gov.my
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106846
https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021-0010
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100412
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100412
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126586


Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

 [6] Nurfatanah, N., Yudha, C. B., Marini, A., & Sumantri, M. S. (2021). Development of 
matemathic media games education based on e-learning in the Planting of Basic Con-
cepts in Numeracy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1), 012127. https://doi.
org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012127

 [7] Lameras, P., Arnab, S., de Freitas, S., Petridis, P., & Dunwell, I. (2021). Science teachers’ 
experiences of inquiry-based learning through a serious game: a phenomenographic perspec-
tive. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00152-z

 [8] Obery, A., Lux, N., Cornish, J., Grimberg, B. I., & Hartshorn, A. (2021a). Competitive 
games as formative assessment in informal science learning: Improvement or hindrance? 
TechTrends, 65(4), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00619-3

 [9] EL Rahman, S. A. (2021). A Game-Based Learning for Teaching Arabic Letters to Dys-
lexic and Deaf Children. In K. and H. A. E. Al-Emran Mostafa and Shaalan (Ed.), Recent 
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Smart Applications (pp. 337–361). Springer Interna-
tional Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_19

 [10] Albar, S. B., & Southcott, J. E. (2021). Problem and project-based learning through an 
investigation lesson: Significant gains in creative thinking behaviour within the Australian 
foundation (preparatory) classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100853. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100853

 [11] Maslihah, S., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, K., Karomah, N., & Iqbal, K. (2021). Increasing 
mathematical literacy ability and learning independence through problem-based learning 
model with realistic mathematic education approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 
1918(4), 042123. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042123

 [12] Izzati, L. R. (2021). The effect of problem-based learning to improve students’ metacogni-
tion skills in solving mathematical problems based on cognitive style. Journal of Physics: 
Conference Series, 1918(4), 042073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042073

 [13] Sujatmiko, Y. A., Isnaeni, W., Ridlo, S., & Saptono, S. (2021). The development of 
andro-webcomic media based on problem-based learning to improve analytical thinking 
ability and scientific attitude. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(5), 052023. 
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052023

 [14] Musna, R. R., Juandi, D., & Jupri, A. (2021). A meta-analysis study of the effect of 
Problem-Based Learning model on students’ mathematical problem-solving skills. Journal 
of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/ 
012090

 [15] Monsang, P., Srikoon, S., & Wichaino, N. (2021). The effects of problem-based learning for 
enhancing science problem solving skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1), 
012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012016

 [16] Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Richard, R. E., 
Pintrich, P., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, 
and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: 
Longman. 

 [17] Chiong, C., & Lim, L. (2020). Seeing families as policy actors: Exploring higher order 
thinking reforms in Singapore through low-income families’ perspectives. Journal of Edu-
cation Policy, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1777468

 [18] Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The 
development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in 
Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6), e07309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.
e07309

 [19] Nguyễn, T. M. T., & Nguyễn, T. T. L. (2017). Influence of explicit higher-order thinking 
skills instruction on students’ learning of linguistics. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 
113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.004

110 http://www.i-jim.org

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012127
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012127
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00152-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00619-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_19
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100853
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100853
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042123
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042073
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052023
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012090
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012090
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012016
https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1777468
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.004


Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

 [20] Dubas, J. M., & Toledo, S. A. (2016). Taking higher order thinking seriously: Using 
Marzano’s taxonomy in the economics classroom. International Review of Economics Edu-
cation, 21, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2015.10.005

 [21] Yee, M. H., Yunos, J. Md., Othman, W., Hassan, R., Tee, T. K., & Mohamad, M. M. (2015). 
Disparity of learning styles and higher order thinking skills among technical students. 
Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
sbspro.2015.08.127

 [22] Wun, K. P., & Harun, J. (2017). The Effect of Scenario-Epistemic Game on Higher Order 
Thinking Skills among High School Chemistry Students in Malaysia. 2017 International 
Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE), 16–22. 
https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2017.10

 [23] Juul, J. (2003). The game, the player, the world: looking for a heart of gameness. DiGRA 
Conference. 

 [24] All, A., Nuñez Castellar, E. P., & van Looy, J. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness of digital 
game-based learning: Best practices. Computers & Education, 92–93, 90–103. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.007

 [25] Bağ, H., & Çalık, M. (2021). Designing an argumentation-based educational digi-
tal game to teach the subject of force. Physics Education, 56(3), 035002. https://doi.
org/10.1088/1361-6552/abdae8

 [26] Apostolellis, P., & Bowman, D. A. (2016). Audience Involvement and Agency in Digital 
Games: Effects on Learning, Game Experience, and Social Presence. Proceedings of the 
The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 299–310. https://
doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930700

 [27] Zou, D., Zhang, R., Xie, H., & Lee, W. F. (2021). Digital game-based learning of 
information literacy: Effects of gameplay modes on university students’ learning perfor-
mance, motivation, self-efficacy and flow experiences. Australasian Journal of Educational 
Technology, 37(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6682

 [28] Bolliger, D. U., Mills, D., White, J., & Kohyama, M. (2015). Japanese students’ perceptions 
of digital game use for English-language learning in higher education. Journal of Educa-
tional Computing Research, 53(3), 384–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115600806

 [29] Bessa, B. R., Santos, S. C. dos, & Fonseca, L. da. (2017). Using a virtual learning environ-
ment for problem-based learning adoption: A case study at a high school in India. 2017 IEEE 
Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190642

 [30] Eryilmaz, A., & Ates, O. (2010). Strenghts and weaknesses of problem-based learning in 
engineering education: Students’ and tutors’ perspectives. Buca Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 
28, 40–58. 

 [31] Lin, M., Preston, A., Kharrufa, A., & Kong, Z. (2016). Making L2 learners’ reasoning skills 
visible: The potential of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Think-
ing Skills and Creativity, 22, 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.004

 [32] Siwawetkul, W., & Koraneekij, P. (2020). Kasetsart journal of social sciences. In Kaset-
sart Journal of Social Sciences (Vol. 41, Issue 1). https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/
article/view/229138#.YQcIdo-VUqU.mendeley 

 [33] Kashefi, H., Yusof, Y. M., Ismail, Z., Men, O. L., Lee, T. J., & Joo, T. K. (2017). Gen-
der and Mathematics Performance of Primary Students in Higher Order Thinking Skills. 
2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF), 808–811. https://doi.org/10.1109/
WEEF.2017.8467086

 [34] Jendyk, R. M. (2016). Decision making in different care settings: Do undergraduate students 
already care? Health Professions Education, 2(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
hpe.2016.01.008

iJIM ‒ Vol. 16, No. 02, 2022 111

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2015.10.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.127
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.127
https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2017.10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.007
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.007
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abdae8
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abdae8
https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930700
https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930700
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6682
https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115600806
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190642
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.004
https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/229138#.YQcIdo-VUqU.mendeley
https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/229138#.YQcIdo-VUqU.mendeley
https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467086
https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467086
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.008
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.008


Paper—Enhancing HOTS using Problem-Based Learning and Digital Game in the Context of Malaysian…

 [35] Harell, K. F. (2019). Deliberative decision-making in teacher education. Teaching and 
Teacher Education, 77, 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.015

 [36] Ahmad, M., Mansor, N. R., Rashid, R. A., Ain, N., Zakaria, C. R., & Sung, C. M. (2021). 
Implementation of digital games in advancing students’ higher-order thinking skills: 
A review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1793(1), 012069. https://doi.org/ 
10.1088/1742-6596/1793/1/012069

 [37] Giannakos, M. N. (2013). Enjoy and learn with educational games: Examining factors affect-
ing learning performance. Computers & Education, 68, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
compedu.2013.06.005

 [38] Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2019). Implementation of game-transformed inqui-
ry-based learning to promote the understanding of and motivation to learn chemistry. 
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10956-018-9754-0

 [39] Hall, J., Stickler, U., Herodotou, C., & Iacovides, I. (2020). Expressivity of creativity 
and creative design considerations in digital games. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 
106206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106206

 [40] Ke, F. (2019). Mathematical problem solving and learning in an architecture-themed epis-
temic game. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1085–1104. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09643-2

 [41] Meishar-Tal, H., & Kesler, A. (2021). “If I create a game I’ll learn”: Online game creation as 
a tool to promote learning skills of students with learning difficulties. Interactive Learning 
Environments, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1919146

 [42] Kapustina, L. v., & Martynova, I. A. (2020). Training Employees in the Digital Economy 
with the Use of Video Games. In S. Ashmarina, A. Mesquita, & M. Vochozka (Eds.), Digital 
Transformation of the Economy: Challenges, Trends and New Opportunities (pp. 444–454). 
Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11367-4_44

 [43] Nino, M., & Evans, M. A. (2015). Fostering 21st-Century Skills in Constructivist Engi-
neering Classrooms With Digital Game-Based Learning. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de 
Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 10(3), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2015.2452673

10 Authors

Liew Chuang Tong is working as a teacher and had graduated from Universiti 
Teknologi Malaysia with Master of Education (Educational Technology). He had 
explored the mechanism of HOTS enhancement in the context of Malaysia primary 
school. This paper was written based on his master project report. He had collected the 
data and make the fundamental writing for this paper.

Mohd Shafie Rosli is a Malaysian active researcher in HOTS and online learning 
environment with more than a decade of research experience in technological assisted 
cognitive augmentation. He had supervised a significant number of postgraduate 
research on the application of online learning environment in the field of education.

Nor Shela Saleh is serving Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. She is an expert 
in social sciences statistics and research methodology, contributing to data analysis and 
literature support in this paper.

Article submitted 2021-10-19. Resubmitted 2021-11-04. Final acceptance 2021-11-04. Final version 
published as submitted by the authors.

112 http://www.i-jim.org

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.015
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1793/1/012069
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1793/1/012069
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.005
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9754-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9754-0
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106206
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09643-2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09643-2
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1919146
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11367-4_44
https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2015.2452673