International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) – eISSN: 1865-7923 – Vol. 13, 6, 2019 Short Paper—Building Reading Fluency with Mobile Assisted Extensive Reading Building Reading Fluency with Mobile Assisted Extensive Reading https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i06.9799 Hendriwanto (*), Utut Kurniati Universitas Swadaya Gunung Djati, Cirebon, Indonesia hendriwanto46@gmail.com Abstract—The study aims at investigating students' reading fluency through mobile assisted extensive reading in effect and responses. Forty-five students (14 males and 31 females) were involved in the study. The participants were asked to read the materials of graded reader in electronic books by using their mobile phone. To measure their reading fluency, reading rate was counted in word per minute. The results show that mobile assisted extensive reading out- performed the students' reading fluency. Some participants commented that mobile based extensive reading was likely to build their reading fluency. It indi- cated that mobile reading might have the potential way not only for reading comprehension but also for reading extensively. Keywords—Extensive Reading, Reading Fluency, Mobile Assisted Extensive Reading 1 Introduction In recent years, extensive reading (henceforth ER) has been discussed by many scholars, not merely in terms of the conceptual works but also the best practices and empirical studies [1] [2] [3] [4]. Many studies have demonstrated that the contribution of ER cannot be denied. ER has a pivotal impact on language input such as vocabu- lary, listening, writing, reading comprehension as well as translation [5] [6] [7] [8]. Moreover, the studies of ER investigate other aspects of students’ background such as motivation, attitude, and perception [9]. There is much supporting evidence that ER fosters the cognitive domain and affec- tive domain [10]. Unfortunately, few teachers and pre-service teachers applied this beneficial strategy in the classroom to engage their students in learning a language [3] [11]. Furthermore, Byun [12] asserted that teachers are not eager to apply this in their teaching practice due to the lack of ER knowledge and motivation. For this reason, ER employs the language theories rather than a general education background. It seems that ER has a fundamental theory that it is easy for students to improve their reading fluency [13] [14] [15] [16]. Some studies have focused on de- veloping fluency since fluency is an important aspect for language learners, but there has been little detailed investigation of reading fluency with mobile-aided extensive reading. Fluency has been an important issue in any second language studies. Waring 84 http://www.i-jim.org https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i06.9799 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i06.9799 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i06.9799 mailto:Hendriwanto46@gmail.com mailto:Hendriwanto46@gmail.com Short Paper—Building Reading Fluency with Mobile Assisted Extensive Reading [17] proposes that reading fluency can be measured based on three aspects namely speed reading, comprehension, and automaticity [17] [18]. Those aspects should have been integrated, unless comprehension matches with speed reading, it cannot be de- fined as reading fluency. In sum, reading fluency requires the three indicators. Mobile assisted language learning studies typically concern with all aspects of lan- guage learning including teaching reading. However, ER in mobile assisted language learning has not received adequate attention. Despite ER implication in the beneficial input, many teachers and educators are eager to utilize the principles of ER. There- fore, this study is aimed at addressing two research questions; • Can mobile assisted extensive reading help students enhance their reading fluency? • What are their responses toward mobile assisted extensive reading program? 2 Methods 2.1 Participants This study involved 45 students for the one-semester program. They were fourteen males and thirty-one females. Their average age was 19 years. Mostly, they came from the same educational background, senior high school. The reason why these participants were invited to participate in the study was because since the first semes- ter, the ER program of ER was available. Prior to entering the university class, the students were asked to complete the language proficiency test. The result showed that the participants had the same proficiency level. 2.2 Context This study was conducted in a setting where all students had an android-based mo- bile phone. Students brought their mobile phone in the classroom both for lesson use and communication. The teachers also had a mobile phone for the learning manage- ment system (LMS) Schoology in teaching practice in the classroom. 2.3 Materials Materials of the study were presented in an electronic book in PDF format. The materials of the graded reader comprised six levels in which the easiest reading mate- rials were in level one and the most difficult ones were in level six. The sample titles of the book are as follows. Table 1. The example of Reading Materials No Book Title Level Genre 1 A letter to Roberto 1 Narrative 2 The Ooze 1 Narrative 3 A Problem for Prince Percy 2 Narrative iJIM ‒ Vol. 13, No. 6, 2019 85 Short Paper—Building Reading Fluency with Mobile Assisted Extensive Reading 4 Vera The Alien Hunter 3 2 Narrative 5 The Lift 3 Narrative 6 The Railway Children 3 Narrative 7 Sherlock Holmes: The Speckled Band 4 Narrative 8 Malala 4 Narrative 9 The Eight Sister 5 Narrative 10 A New Song for Nina 5 Narrative 11 Agnes Grey 6 Narrative 12 Battle for Big Tree Country 6 Narrative 2.4 Procedures In the first meeting, the students were not provided with an overview of extensive reading program to acquire reliability of the study. The participants were asked to choose the book what they want in Schoology LMS account starting from level 1 to level 6. Participants were asked to read extensively for eight meetings in which one meeting consisted of ninety minutes. In the next phase, the participants submitted the three requirements such as the book title they read, the length of pages they read, and what responses of reading materials they felt. Those were written in the Schoology LMS account. In the previous meeting, we counted the amount of their reading rate in one minute. Then, at the end of the program, we asked them again to read certain reading materials in one minute. This phase was aimed at measuring the differences of reading rate between pre and post ER program. The participant chose a wide range of topics in Schoology LMS account and read extensively. Then, in each reading activity, they were invited to write a comment and reading log as can be seen in the figures below. Fig. 1. A wide range of reading materials in mobile phone 86 http://www.i-jim.org Short Paper—Building Reading Fluency with Mobile Assisted Extensive Reading Fig. 2. Reading materials in mobile phone Fig. 3. Students’ responses iJIM ‒ Vol. 13, No. 6, 2019 87 Short Paper—Building Reading Fluency with Mobile Assisted Extensive Reading Fig. 4. Students’ reading log 3 Result and Discussion To answer the research questions, the results and discussion are explained with the two parts; data of reading rate word per minute and students’ responses and interview results. Fig. 5. The word per minute of participant Figure 5 shows the numbers of different reading rates in pretest and posttest was obtained from 45 participants during the study. Overall, although participant 1 had the highest reading rate at first, it was replaced by participant 6 in post-test with 140 88 http://www.i-jim.org Short Paper—Building Reading Fluency with Mobile Assisted Extensive Reading words per minute rate. In contrast, participant 45 had the lowest score in reading per minute compared to the other participants with 50 words only. In the first treatment, the average reading speed was 65 words for each student. This figure illustrates a sudden decrease of four participants who had a reading amount of about 120 to 140 words per minutes. Following this, there were some fluc- tuations among the participants, after which it increased and decreased in each meet- ing. The figure for reading rate in post-test after 8 meetings was initially almost as high as that for reading speed standard with 140 words per minutes. However, although not all the participants read with a big number of words, their number of words after the intervention of ER program increased as can be seen in the figure 5. Fig. 6. Students’ Response to Online Extensive Reading The respondents perceived that the benefits of ER program based on their respons- es to the ER activities. The two highest responses with strongly agree choice were the learning fun in reading and reading. The reading response was slightly less strongly disagreed choice, although 60% of the respondents preferred to select disagree with the reading activities. iJIM ‒ Vol. 13, No. 6, 2019 89 Short Paper—Building Reading Fluency with Mobile Assisted Extensive Reading The neutral responses illustrate the students' perception of mobile assisted exten- sive reading. Being eager to read extensively for some students does not seem to be a strong motivation which engaged them in reading through mobile learning. Mobile assisted extensive reading was designed to provide flexibility for students to read anywhere and in any situation. Reading extensively integrated with comprehension engages students and improves their reading fluency. The most well-defined principle of ER is that students have to read faster, not rely- ing on the dictionary to acquire the automaticity of reading input. We found two es- sential reasons that students prefer not to open the dictionary; first, almost easily no- ticeable vocabulary and, second, to increase reading rate. Among our respondents, reading graded readers motivated them to read more and more. Our findings show that ER inspired them to be involved in the story they read and want to continue to the next level of reading materials. To obtain the data of students’ responses towards the ER program, interviews with the students were conducted. The results can be seen below; For learning, today is very exciting, very conducive and not noisy. the lecturer is good, and his way of teaching makes me understand. I used to not like to read and I now like to read. (Agus, anonymized) I enjoyed the learning process for today because I can finish a book and immediate- ly make a summary about the book. and the lecturer also taught us how to separate a sentence word by word. it's new for me so I really enjoy it. but unfortunately, there's not enough time to explain about it further so I feel like there's something missing cause I need more explanation about it. I'd like to hear about how to separate the sen- tence again later, sir. (Harlyn, anonymized) The participants seem very interested in employing mobile assisted extensive read- ing in which they engaged with the text. Prior to reading activities, the student said I used not to like to read (hate reading) and I now like to read. It can be concluded that the participant acquired a new motivation in reading. Furthermore, integrating the ability to read texts with comprehension and extensive reading may lead students to obtain new insights into how to read extensively. 4 Conclusion The results of this study show that mobile assisted extensive reading improve the students' reading fluency. This study suggests that mobile assisted extensive reading has a potential not only for reading comprehension but also for reading extensively. Limitations of mobile responsive support and poor connection may cause an issue in the implementation of online extensive reading. Therefore, further research is need- ed to investigate the combination of online and printout reading materials. 90 http://www.i-jim.org Short Paper—Building Reading Fluency with Mobile Assisted Extensive Reading 5 References [1] N. Arnold, “Online extensive reading for advanced foreign language learners: An evalua- tion study,” Foreign Language Annals, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 340–366, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01024.x [2] C. Lin, “Computers & Education Learning English reading in a mobile-assisted extensive reading program,” Computer & Education, vol. 78, no. 9, pp. 48–59, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.004 [3] Y. Huang, “Why Don’t They do It? A Study on the Implementation of Extensive Reading in Taiwan,” Cogent Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2015. [4] T. Robb and M. Kano, “Effective Extensive Reading Outside the Classroom: A Large- Scale Experiment,” Reading in a Foreign Language, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 234–247, 2013. [5] N. Suk, “The Effects of Extensive Reading on Reading Comprehension, Reading Rate, and Vocabulary Acquisition,” Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 73–89, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.152 [6] Z. Sun, X. M. Yang, and K. K. He, “An extensive reading strategy to promote online writing for elementary students in the 1:1 digital classroom,” Computer Assisted Language Learning., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 398–412, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.974860 [7] M. Stephens, “Why Extensive Reading and Listening to Audio Books May not be Enough,” Reading Matrix, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 252–255, 2015. [8] N. Sakurai, “The influence of translation on reading amount, proficiency, and speed in extensive reading,” Reading in a Foreign Language, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 96–112, 2015. [9] I. Liu and S. S. Young, “An exploration of participative motivations in a community-based online English extensive reading contest with respect to gender difference,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1090457 [10] T. Nakanishi, “A Meta-Analysis of Extensive Reading Research,” TESOL Quarterly., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 6–37, 2014. [11] S. R. S. Litheko and A. N. Maduekwe, “Pre-service teachers’ apathy to extensive reading: Imperatives for best practices in Nigerian universities,” Africa Education Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55–78, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2011.586143 [12] J.-H. Byun, “Korean EFL Teachers’ Perspectives About Their Participation in an Exten- sive Reading Program,” The University of Texas at Austin, 2010. [13] A. C. S. Chang and S. Millett, “Improving reading rates and comprehension through au- dio-assisted extensive reading for beginner learners,” System, vol. 52, pp. 91–102, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.05.003 [14] D. Beglar and A. Hunt, “Pleasure reading and reading rate gains,” Reading in a Foreign Language, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 29–48, 2014. [15] D. Beglar and A. Hunt, “The Effect of Pleasure Reading on Japanese University EFL Learners’ Reading Rates,” Language Learning, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1–39, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00651.x [16] J. Huffman, “Reading rate gains during a one-semester extensive reading course,” Reading in a Foreign Language, 26 (2), 17-33. Available: http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2014/articles/huffman.pdf, 2014. [17] R. Waring, “Building fluency with extensive reading” in T. Muller, J. Adamson, P. S. Brown, & S. Herder (Eds.). Exploring EFL fluency in Asia (pp. 213-230). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449405_13 iJIM ‒ Vol. 13, No. 6, 2019 91 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01024.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01024.x https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.004 https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.152 https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.152 https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.974860 https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.974860 https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1090457 https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1090457 https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2011.586143 https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2011.586143 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.05.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.05.003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00651.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00651.x http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2014/articles/huffman.pdf http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2014/articles/huffman.pdf https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449405_13 Short Paper—Building Reading Fluency with Mobile Assisted Extensive Reading [18] R. Day, “Extensive Reading,” The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp. 1–7, 2018. 6 Acknowledgement This research was supported and funded by Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Indonesia. (Grant Number SK: 0045/E3/LL/2018. No : 0790/K4/KM/2018. 7 Authors Hendriwanto is Lecturer at Department of English Education, Faculty of Teaching and Educational Science, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Djati, Cirebon, Indonesia. His research interests include Extensive Reading, Mobile Learning and Materials Devel- opment. Utut Kurnati is Lecturer at Department of English Education, Faculty of Teaching and Educational Science, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Djati, Cirebon, Indonesia. Her areas of interest are reading, literature in education, and English drama. ututkurni- ati@gmail.com Article submitted 2018-11-01. Resubmitted 2019-04-01. Final acceptance 2019-04-14. Final version published as submitted by the authors 92 http://www.i-jim.org https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449405_13 mailto:ututkurniati@gmail.com mailto:ututkurniati@gmail.com