


































International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation (IJSEIro) 

Volume 6 / Issue 12 / 2019 

 

14 

 

 

 

 

The influence of the Russian psychological pedagogy (by L.S. 

Lev Vygotsky) upon the model of education curricular 

design in the American cultural space 

 
 

Aura Hapenciuc 

"Ştefan cel Mare University" of Suceava, Romania  

E:mail: aurahapenciuc@yahoo.com 

 

Abstract 

The paper demonstrates the way in which the Russian psychologist L.S.Vygotsky, who anticipates the 

paradigm of the curriculum, is perceived in the American cultural space. A representative of the 

sociocultural constructivism in education, L.S.Vygotsky is concerned with the problem of approaching 

the epistemic specificity of pedagogy as a specialized science in the study of education. The process 

through which pedagogy turns scientific can be confirmed according to three criteria: the research 

object, the normativity and the research methodology. The specific research object of L.S.Vygotsky’s 

psychological pedagogy is represented by the quality learning that pushes the development ahead, in 

the area of the proximal development, possible within a socio-cultural mediated training activity 

through the pedagogical scaffold created between educator and educated. The specific normativity 

asserted in the L.S.Vygotsky’s psychological pedagogy is based upon two complementary principles: 

the creation of the scaffold and the orientation of education at the area level of the proximal 

development. The research methodology refers to: the method of the qualitative structural analysis; 

the genetic method; the comparative method and the instrumental method. L.S.Vygotsky’s theory of 

socio-cultural constructivism has generated a revolution in pedagogy, exerting a strong influence in 

the US, in the field of the curriculum reconstruction, initiated by the psycho-pedagogue Jerome S. 

Bruner. The constructivist pedagogical model developed by L.S.Vygotsky who influenced the 

psychological theory of learning proposed by J.S.Bruner draws attention upon the need to capitalize 

on three ways of organizing the training – by action (with objects), iconic (by images), 

symbolic/verbal (by notions formed and developed). Despite the strongly ideologized era in which he 

created, the Russian educator managed to anticipate an important line of the postmodern 

(contemporary) pedagogy. 

 

Keywords: psychological pedagogy, sociocultural constructivism, scaffolding, area of the proximal 

development, normativity 

 

 1. Introduction 

From a historical viewpoint, the principle of perspective lines places the two representatives 

of the Russian psychological pedagogy, L.S.Vygotsky and P.I.Galperin, in the modern era. From an 

axiomatic view point, they anticipate the curriculum paradigm, to the extent that their influence on 

the basis of the postmodern (contemporary) American pedagogy developed since the 1960s by J.S. 

Bruner. 

mailto:aurahapenciuc@yahoo.com


International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation (IJSEIro) 

Volume 6 / Issue 12 / 2019 

 

15 

 

 

 

The direction of the psychological pedagogy launched and developed intensively and 

extensively by the two great Russian psychologists and educators was at the base of the curricular 

design model of the education practiced and promoted in the American cultural space. We aim to 

demonstrate how these educators have succeeded in anticipating an important line of postmodern 

(contemporary) pedagogy in the conditions in which they lived and created in an era full of 

shortcomings and strongly ideologized social orders. On this background one can also consider the 

contribution made by D. Elkonin, significant in the context of pre-primary and primary education, 

which valorizes, in curricular terms, the "psychology of the game". 

 

2. Content development 

Lev Simionovici Vygotsky (1896-1934) launched the cultural-historical theory of the psychic 

development, defining the connection between consciousness and language: Мышление и речь. 

(Thinking and language) 1934, Sketches of behavioral history, in collaboration with Soviet 

neurologist A.R. Luria, Психология искусства (Psychology of art) 1965. He founded a school of 

psychology with A.R. Luria, A.N. Leontiev and P.I.Zincenko. 

L.S.Vygotsky is a representative of the sociocultural constructivism in education, a distinct 

orientation, different from the structural-genetic psychological constructivism of J. Piaget, affirmed 

later, in the 1960s. The difference between the two currents lies in the understanding of the 

relationship between learning and development. At J.Piaget, the psychic development in stages (pre-

operative, concrete operational, formal, operational) determines the learning. At L.S.Vygotsky, the 

learning can anticipate the development if it is organized socio-culturally correctly, through special 

pedagogical relationships created between the adult (parents, educator, etc.) and the child, the 

preadolescent and the adolescent. 

The great Russian psychologist defines, promotes and supports, in this direction, two original 

notions that underlie his psychological pedagogy with a psycho-socio-cultural orientation: 

1) The scaffolding – defines the pedagogical relations between the educator and the educated, 

which must be created in a socio-cultural development-friendly environment, necessary to stimulate 

the development of the educated at the optimum level, in relation to its psycho-social resources, 

usable in the act of learning. 

2) The development proximal area – defines the area favorable to the optimal training and 

development of the educated by capitalizing on the learning resources, properly organized, at the level 

of the correlation ("scaffolding") between the educator – the educated, existing or created by an adult, 

in a socio-cultural environment favorable to education and the educated. 

In the plan of the pedagogical normativity, L.S.Vygotsky  also formulates the criterion of the 

use of language and interaction with the socio-cultural environment necessary in the act of learning. 

In this specially created environment, the child develops: 

a) due to the interaction with the adult, who is the bearer of values, ideals and attitudes;  

b) through language, with which the child explores and studies the world around him carefully, 

thus perfecting his tools of thought and learning. 

At the general pedagogical level, L.S.Vygotsky proposes or suggests a model of training 

activity based upon a psychological theory of learning that falls within the category of socio-cultural 

constructivism, different from the structural-genetic constructivism, promoted by Jean Piaget. 



International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation (IJSEIro) 

Volume 6 / Issue 12 / 2019 

 

16 

 

 

 

The theory of structural-genetic constructivism, promoted by Piaget, states that the 

development of cognitive structures of the personality of the educated (child, early school infant, pre-

adolescent, adolescent), in genetic, stage evolution (pre-operative, concrete operational, formal 

operational) determines the learning. 

 The theory of socio-cultural constructivism, promoted by L.S.Vygotsky, will generate a 

revolution in pedagogy, in the general didactics (and in the private didactics) under the conditions in 

which learning is achieved, through the mediation of the educating adult, in a socio-cultural context 

favorable to the positive formation of the educated (child, student), anticipated and optimally oriented 

– at the level of the training design, in the proximal development area. 

In this perspective, the psychological theory of learning proposed by L.S.Vygotsky in the 

1930s, will exert a strong influence in the US, in the field of curriculum reconstruction, initiated and 

developed by the great psycho-pedagogue Jerome S. Bruner who has been scientifically campaigning 

"for a (new) theory of training. "[ Bruner, J.S., 1970] In the aforementioned context, the specialized 

literature notes that under conditions of diachronic analysis and history," the American psychologist 

Jerome S. Bruner, strongly influenced by L.S.Vygotsky 's research, develops and applies his ideas in 

education", in training, in the reconstruction of the curriculum and at the educational process level. 

[Bruner, J.S., 1970, p. 112]. 

Within the paradigm of psychological pedagogy, L.S.Vygotsky calls for "the model of the 

socio-cultural structures of training", which capitalize "the cultural socio-genesis of training", using 

"the instrumental method" which "studies the child not only as a developed being, but also as an 

educable being". through "unitary alloy" between "natural psychological functions" (related to 

organic maturation) and "the higher psychological functions" (voluntary attention, logical memory, 

internal language, thinking / training of notions), with the higher pedagogical resources of 

continuous socio-cultural development. [Днепров, Э.Д., 2011, pp. 42-57]. 

The "pedagogical psychology" elaborated by L.S.Vygotsky has as a specific object of study 

"the essence of the cultural development which consists in the clash between the cultural forms of the 

behavior – the adult, as a real or potential educator – that the child encounters, and the primitive forms 

that characterize his or her own behavior" (as the educated). [Vîgotski, L.S., 1971, p. 137]. 

The specific normativity affirmed within the psychological pedagogy, promoted by 

L.S.Vygotsky  implies the following principles: 

a) the creation of the pedagogical "scaffolding" between the educator (adult) and the 

educated (child, elementary school infant), at the socio-cultural environment favorable to training 

and development, whereby the "child" (the educated) acquires the efficient mechanisms of thinking 

and learning" [Vîgotski, L.S., 1971]; 

b) the orientation of education/training/learning in the direction of the training-development 

of the educated at the level of "area of the proximal development" which represents "what the child 

(the educator) is capable of immediately acknowledge with the help of an adult" (the educator). 

[Vîgotski, L.S., 1971, p. 320]. 

The research methodology is specific to the psychological pedagogy, proposed by 

L.S.Vygotsky implies the following categories of methods, which involves respecting the normativity 

specific to the studied field: 

1) The method of the qualitative structural analysis highlights that in any research: 



International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation (IJSEIro) 

Volume 6 / Issue 12 / 2019 

 

17 

 

 

 

a) "one must start from the clarification of the notions, from the formulation of the basic 

problems" that allow the construction of "a new viewpoint on a limited number of already known 

data" [Vîgotski, L.S., 1971, pp. 12, 13]; 

b) one must observe the specificity of the object of study of the psychological pedagogy in 

which "the causal explanation – typical of the natural sciences – must be replaced by the teleological 

one", typical of the socio-human sciences. [Vîgotski, L.S., 1971, p. 21]; 

2) The genetic method. It highlights the fact that "the development of the higher forms of 

behavior (a.n. cognitive, but also non-cognitive, of the educated / child, the early school infant), a 

certain structure taken as a premise" of effective learning / training / education. 

3) The comparative method. It highlights the differences between the normal child, "which 

combines the two developmental plans, biological and cultural, and the abnormal child, which cannot 

ensure an agreement between the two developmental plans, with chronic negative effects "in the field 

of higher psychic forms and process learning and the acquisition of cultural models of cognitive and 

non-cognitive behavior. [Vîgotski, L.S., 1971, pp. 40-45]; 

4) The instrumental method. It highlights the "tools" or "intellectual techniques" (language, 

writing, calculus, notions, schemes, drawings, diagrams, maps, formulas) acquired by the child 

(educated) according to some purposes proposed by the educator (adult), "aimed at mastery of one's 

own or other people's behavioral processes". This basic method in the L.S.Vygotskyan psychological 

pedagogy, critically goes beyond the "natural endowment theory (Binet)", underlining the essential 

role of higher psychic functions "in the process of training and developing the educated (child, early 

years pupil, pupil). [Vîgotski, L.S., 1971, pp. 165-170]. 

The construction of the socio-cultural structures of the training, in the school context, but also 

in the extra-curricular context, requires the knowledge and capitalization of the relation between 

"thinking and language", an essential issue for the formation and management of the personality of 

the educated, which is the core of L.S.Vygotsky's scientific work, a fundamental research field by 

which the great Russian psychologist and educator became famous for in the USA and worldwide. 

(see L.S. Vîgotski, 1972, Psychological Works, vol. 2, Didactic and Pedagogical Publishing House, 

Bucharest). [Vîgotski, L.S., 1972]. 

L. S. Vîgotski analyzes the process of formation and development of the notions, which is so 

important in the training activities organized in the school context, but also in an extra-curricular 

context. 

"The formation of notions as a process", involves the completion of two stages that must be 

designed and valorised pedagogically in relation to the specific of each discipline and stages of 

education:  

a) the presentation of the material, object, facts, events, activities, etc. which must be defined 

at the conceptual level;  

b) assimilating the word "with the help of which the respective notion is born" or the respective 

concept. 

"The development of notions"/concepts during the educational process imply "three stages": 

a) the object stage, supported didactically by "images based upon the syncretism of perception 

or action" – at the educational process level this psychological stage is typical for the preschool stage; 



International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation (IJSEIro) 

Volume 6 / Issue 12 / 2019 

 

18 

 

 

 

b) the complex stage, taught didactically by "associating different objects with common 

names", promoted at the level of "potential notions" – at the educational process level this 

psychological stage is typical for the early school stage; 

c) the verbal stage, didactically supported by the "use of the word as a notion" – this step that 

is psychologically crossed at pre-adolescence age, will be used pedagogically throughout the middle 

and high school, in the university environment and in effective lifelong learning conditions. [Vîgotski, 

L.S., 1972, pp. 98-153] apud Sorin Cristea. [Cristea, Sorin, 2005, p. 54; Eşi, 2014, ] 

 

3. Conclusions and sugestions 

The constructivist pedagogical model, developed by L.S.Vygotsky (in the 1930s), will 

decisively influence the psychological theory of learning, proposed by J. S. Bruner, which underlies 

the reconstruction of the curriculum in the U.S. in the years 1960-1970, with echoes to date, a theory 

with major pedagogical impact, which draws attention to the need to capitalize on three gradual ways 

of organizing the training – by action (with objects), iconic (by images), symbolic / verbal ( through 

notions formed and developed) – dependent upon the age of the students, upon the stage reached by 

them in training and upon the particularities of each stage and education disciplines [Bruner, J.S., 

1970; Eşi, 2010]. 

The acquisition of scientific notions in the activity of school (and extracurricular) training 

implies two types of learning:  

a) passive, through reproductive memory;  

b) active, through "direct action upon the notion" with the help of thinking; 

c) The orientation of the pupils' training in a positive sense (depending on the quality of the 

training objectives, designed by the educators, at all levels of the education system) requires, at the 

level of pedagogical normativity:  

c1) learning the notions "based on the major effort of the whole activism of thought" (see all 

the fundamental and instrumental operations of thinking as a superior logical/rational/intellectual 

cognitive process);  

c2) the "development of spontaneous and scientific notions" at the level of "processes closely 

related to the student", reflected by the didactic principle of the interdependence between intuitive – 

logical knowledge, necessary in effective learning, within the specific framework of each training 

activity;  

c3) capitalizing on learning at school age (early but also medium and high) as a "decisive 

moment that determines the whole destiny of the intellectual development of the child(the student)". 

[Vîgotski, L.S., 1972, pp. 165-167]. 

Pedagogically, L.S.Vygotsky notes, highlights and emphasizes that not every learning activity, 

in general, the "learning the scientific notions", in particular, is positive, with a positive impact upon 

the cognitive (but also non-cognitive) development of the pupils. Valuable and important 

pedagogically is "only that type of learning that pushes the development ahead". Its curricular (but 

also extracurricular) accomplishment training requires, in the normative plan, the construction of the 

optimum educator – educated "scaffolding", in a socio-cultural context which is favorable to the 

positive formation of the educated one, which correctly guides the action of learning in the area of 

the next development. Only in this way can the higher prospective vocation of education as an activity 



International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation (IJSEIro) 

Volume 6 / Issue 12 / 2019 

 

19 

 

 

 

of formation and development of the personality of the educated person (child, student, etc.) be 

confirmed [Cristea, Sorin, 2005, pp. 56-57]. 

In the elaboration of our research we considered the sources cited, important for their 

informational and methodological value. For a deep understanding of the ideas, phenomena and 

historical-pedagogical processes, we can also refer to the article which outlines the general historical 

framework, with reference to the history of education in Russia and to the evolution of the 

pedagogical thinking in Russia. 

 

References 

1. Bruner, J.S., (1970). Pentru o teorie a instruirii, Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică. 

 

2. Cristea, Sorin, (2005). Teorii ale învăţării: modele de instruire. Bucureşti: E. D. P. R. A. 

 

3. Eşi, M. (2014). About a (non) theory of education.Education for peace versus education for war. 

International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation (IJSEIro), 99-104. 

 

4. Eşi M. (2010). Didactica specialităţii între strategii discursive şi performanţe argumentative. 

Suceava: Editura Universităţii Ştefan cel Mare Suceava. 

 

5. Днепров, Э.Д., (2011). Новейшая политическая история российского образования: опыт и 

уроки. Издание 2-е. Дополненное. Москва: Мариос.   

 

6. Vîgotski, L.S., (1971). Opere psihologice alese. vol. I. traducere de Valentina Radu şi Ludmila 

Slifca. Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică.  

 

7. Vîgotski, L.S., (1972). Opere psihologice alese. vol. II. traducere de Valentina Radu şi Ludmila 

Slifca. Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


