3. 1881-6749-1-LE_Q8_1881-6749-1-LE ABSTRACT This article investigates a low carbon pathway, the theoretical frame for understanding the trade- offs between economic development and climate change. An already developed model – Electricity Planning-Low Carbon Development (EP-LCD) – was adapted and modified to examine the nonlinear relationship between generation adequacy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction for better targeted strategic regional intervention on climate change. Two broad scenarios – Base and LCD Option – were tested for the West African Power Pool (WAPP). The cost impact of increasing generation capacity in the LCD Option was estimated at US$1.54 trillion over a 50 year period. Achieving the goal of low carbon pathway would be largely influenced by government decision. Four strategies, in line with the Nationally Determined Contribution in Paris Agreement, were recommended. These are: a) enforced improved efficient electricity generation through increased energy efficiency that should result in increased capacity factor; b) decreased energy intensity of economic activities to result in reduced emission factor in existing plants; c) attract new investment through low tax or tax exemption to reduce cost of constructing power plants for the benefit of base-load plants; and d) subsidized cost of low-carbon fuels in the short run to benefit intermediate load plants and allow for the ramping up of low-/no-carbon fuel generation capacity. These are recommended considering the region’s specific economical and political conditions where funds are tremendously difficult to raise. Implementing these recommendations will allow the electric power industry in West Africa to contribute to achieving sustainable development path. 1. Introduction Climate change is a complex, multi-faceted, and serious threat the world faces [1]. Tackling it requires an understanding of existing trade-offs with the economic growth required in large parts of the world. This will simultaneously advance developmental aspirations as well as address climate change impact. Low carbon development (LCD) pathways is explored for the West African electricity system, as a paradigm that contributes to addressing these twin challenges. This brief is prepared from a study [2] that evaluated the planning International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 21 processes in the West African Power Pool (WAPP) electricity system vis-a-vis LCDs. The concept of Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS) was introduced by the Conference of Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC). It represents a common but differentiated approach to meet the overall emissions reduction objectives. West Africa (Figure 1) is made up of the 15 countries Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Cote d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, and Togo. Fourteen of these are located on the continent. The total * Corresponding author e-mail: abiodunmomodu8@gmail.com; amomodu@cerd.gov.ng International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 21–38 Energy Use: Electricity System in West Africa and Climate Change Impact Abiodun S. Momodu* Centre for Energy Research and Development, Obafemi Awolowo University, PMB 024, Ile-Ife, 220005, Nigeria Keywords: Low-carbon-development; Electricity; System dynamics; Climate change; West Africa; URL: dx.doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.2017.14.3 22 International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 Energy Use: Electricity System in West Africa and Climate Change Impact population of West Africa was estimated at 353.2 million [3] in 2015. This population is very unequally distributed, with Nigeria holding over 52% of this, occupying a land space of only approximately 18% out of the total of 5,105 million km2. The Africapolis study [4] reports an annual urban growth rate of 5.1% and a population growth rate of 4.3% between 1950 and 2000 for West Africa. The report went further to categorize the region as one of the least urbanized in the world, partially because it is also one of the least industrialized and poorest in terms of economic resources. Going further, a World Bank ranking of the WAPP countries amongst 217 global economies by the gross domestic product (GDP) shows that only Nigeria is ranked amongst the first 30 global economies, with only two more ranked amongst the first 100 economies while the remaining countries in the WAPP fall in the range of 100th to 195th global economies. In per capita terms, the poorest country in the WAPP is Niger, which was ranked 144th in the world, with $359/capita in 2015. The “richest” country, Nigeria, in the 23rd place with GDP per capita of $2,672 [6]. Over the last few years, the local economy of some of the WAPP countries (Nigeria, Liberia, Guinea, Mali) have suffered badly from financial, political and social turmoil [4]. Low levels of urbanization and high levels of poverty go hand in hand with low populations in many countries: Guinea Bissau, Gambia, Liberia, Togo, and Sierra Leone all have fewer than 5 million inhabitants. Because of this combination of low levels of urbanization and wealth, the urban markets of West Africa are insignificant when seen on a global scale. According to the World Bank, the region in 2015, had a combined GDP estimated at US$628 billion, which was barely 3% of that of USA with an almost similar population size in the same period. The economy of West Africa is coordinated under the aegis of ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States), established in 1975. In terms of energy, West Africa’s strategic resources include hydro-electricity, oil, natural gas and coal. These are unequally distributed in the territory. Additionally, aside from its hydro sources, the region is endowed with other renewable energy sources such as solar insolation, bio-energy and wind. However, despite being endowed with these energy resources, access to electricity in the sub-region has remained at less than 50% in the urban areas and less than 20% in rural areas. Energy use, particularly electricity is projected to rise in the nearest future. At an average economic growth rate of about 6% annually, the demand for electricity is projected to grow in the same or higher proportion. The implication is obvious as regards GHG emissions, depending on the choice of the mix of power plants that would be needed to meet the future demand for electricity [7]. It is in realization of the need to harness and efficiently utilize its energy resources for development that it (ECOWAS) established the West African Power Pool in 1999, which became operationalized in 2006 [7]. The WAPP, which is a specialized institution of ECOWAS is the institutional framework of the regional electric system. The strategic objective of the WAPP is based on a dynamic vision of the integration of the operation of the national electricity networks in a unified regional market. This unified regional market must make it possible to ensure in the medium and long term an optimal electricity supply, reliable and at an affordable cost to the population of the various member states [7]. West African electricity system currently has an installed capacity of 17,155 MW, out of which available capacity was 10,094 MW in 2015 [8]. Installed capacity is the nameplate/rated/nominal capacity representing the intended full-load sustained output of a power plant in the power system. On the other hand, available capacity is the maximum amount of power that the system is capable of generating in a given period. The large difference between installed and available capacity in the case of West Africa power system is Figure 1: Political map of West Africa [5] International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 23 attributed to age of generation stock which in turn affects their efficiencies and produce high energy intensity. The WAPP system has only four electricity technology types in its generation stock, categorised based on fuel. The technologies within these fuel types also vary in terms efficiency, emission and capacity factor. The current composition as of 2015 shows that oil contributes about 14%, coal, 0.3%, natural gas, 48.5% while hydro make up the rest with 37.2% [2] of production. Nuclear is currently not among the mix of generation technologies. It is noted that anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are mainly driven by population size, economic activity, lifestyle, energy use, land-use patterns, technology and climate policy [9]. Meaning, new approaches, such as low carbon pathway being examined in this article, are needed to control future emissions [9]. 1.1. Statement of problem Rapid transformation involving adequate provision of critical infrastructure such as energy including electricity for socio-economic development is needed by West Africa member states. To avoid pre- industrialization trajectory*, this will demand ample understanding of the trade-offs between economic growth and development aspiration on the one hand, and climate change issues on the other. Arguably, the sub- regional desire to develop should precede that of global environmental concern in ranking; however, it is important that this developmental pursuit be done with some sense of responsibility to the environment [10]. This is the underlying principle behind the Paris Agreement to which all WAPP member countries are signatories. Though large-scale economic development is needed to pull millions of citizens out of abject poverty, a “business-as-usual” approach would exacerbate the problem of climate change with potentially irreversible long-term consequences. With these factors affecting anthropogenic emissions, West Africa sub-region, though considered amongst the Non-Annex 1 countries*, could well become a prime source for future GHG emissions except if its policy makers adopt strategic intervention for the energy consumption agenda and climate change mitigation. This is to meet economic development from future demand and avoid the same trajectories as those of developed countries [11, 12, 13]. According to [5], “business-as-usual” are projected for Non-Annex I emissions in the absence of any new climate policies to control emissions. These projections however shows that by 2050, emissions in all Non- Annex I regions would need to be substantially reduced below “business-as-usual”. For West African countries, without any strategic intervention, the quest to increase generation capacity in the power sector would definitely take the same trajectories as those of developed countries and cause undesired increase in the release of GHG emissions to the atmosphere [11, 12, 13]. LCDSs have attracted the interest in the climate negotiations as a soft alternative to voluntary or obligatory GHG emission reduction targets in developing countries as it also represents the concept of Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) to emission reduction [11]. Although there is no internationally agreed definition of LCDSs, this article focuses on policy of integrated climate and (low-carbon) development strategies that cover the intersection of development and GHG mitigation in West Africa power sector. Low-carbon development strategies represent a different planning paradigm from what used to be the norm in planning the power sector [14, 15, 16]. In line with this global expectation, it becomes important to develop LCDS for the power sector, a critical infrastructure in West African sub-region for sustainable development. 1.2. Objective West African nations are evolving, and need energy to drive their various economic activities. Energy drives economic development, and in turn, economic development drives the need for more energy usage. It is imperative to therefore understand how the energy use of these nations will evolve at the different stages of their development as an essential means of having a reliable prospective analysis and planning. This study is intended as a decision support tool for WAPP future electricity consumption in examining the push-pull factors of the system as regards climate change. It is well reported that the relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth is non-linear [17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. Also, literature on development history across countries have usually shown an ‘S-shaped’ (sigmoid) relationship between per capita electricity consumption and per capita GDP [22, 18]. Systems that exhibit S-shaped growth behavior are Abiodun S. Momodu * This simply refers to the path that has had predominantly fossil-fuel based energy technologies , * Non-Annex I Parties are mostly developing countries without any obligation to meet any defined emission target under the Kyoto Protocol. 24 International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 Energy Use: Electricity System in West Africa and Climate Change Impact characterized by constraints, or limits to growth [23]. By this growth, two points of inflexion are indicated, which, in terms of electricity development, the first corresponds to the transition from non-industrial to industrializing stage, in which increase in economic growth leads to a more proportionate growth in electricity consumption. The second inflexion point corresponds to where economic growth rate would become de-linked from electricity consumption because of two major factors. First, the structure of the economy at this point is dominated by the service sector as shown in the case of industrially developed countries; and second, due to increase in energy efficiency [24]. To avoid previous-industrialised GHG emission trajectory, nations in West Africa, which are the Non- Annex 1 countries, would need to adopt strategic intervention in energy consumption by understanding the trade-offs between the variables of energy and economy. This challenge makes the use of System Dynamics (SD) as the modelling tool with its non- linearity capacity important to examine these factors. SD has the capacity to endogenously alter the active or dominant structure of a system and shift loop dominance. Given the expected S-shaped growth trend in the economy of West Africa, will its electricity development have to rise to eventually reach the level of that of developed countries or will it peak at a certain level in its development path? What will be the implication of this growth path to emission from the electricity industry? The answers to these questions could be useful in adjusting policies towards attaining sustainable development path in the WAPP. This informs the objective of this article: to provide policy decision support system in energy consumption agenda and climate change. 2. Energy consumption and GHG emission pattern in West African countries A number of studies have been conducted as regards electricity and climate change in West Africa. A study by Gnansounou et al [25] examined strategies on electricity supply and climate change, reporting on the evolution of regional electricity market on the basis of two strategies – “autarkical” and “integration†”. It recommends integration strategy as it leads to fast retirement of the aged power plants and the integration of new investment projects to bring about additional benefits in terms of reduced capital expenditures, lower electricity supply cost and the enhanced system’s reliability compared to the autarkical strategy. It did not examine the climate change and cost impacts. Another study on WAPP [26] develop models to understand the long-term interactions between investment and performance in the electric power system. It shows that WAPP interconnection has a clear impact on the local system prices and investments in new construction but there will still be large regional variations in prices and new construction. A third study [27] assesses extreme temperatures and heat waves impacts on electricity consumption in some cities in West Africa. It reports that electricity consumption trends in the cities examined match extreme temperatures evolution well. An SD study [15] examines trade-offs between economic growth and climate change that provides the context to explore LCD pathways for the West African electricity system. It identifies four high leverage points that could serve to achieve LCD in the WAPP. In terms of consumption, Table 1 shows the 2015 installed generation and available capacity and GHG emission factor for countries of West Africa. Nigeria had the highest installed and available capacity. This is followed by Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire respectively. Based on available data for 2015, the least electrified and GHG emitting country is Liberia. However, in examining the countries through the lens of per capita consumption as represented in Figure 2, a different hierarchy emerges. The highest per capita electricity generation country is Ghana at 469 kWh/person and GHG emission of 0.153 tCO2eq/capita, followed by Cote d’Ivoire with 333 kWh/person and 0.108 tCO2eq/person. Though Senegal has the third highest per capita electricity generation, it has the second highest per capita emission rate at 0.134 tCO2eq. This therefore shows that for better targeted strategic regional intervention on climate change, detailed examination of micro production/consumption of electricity is essential. Micro production/consumption means taking the effects of consumption into consideration in the choice of generation technology. As Nigeria contributed significantly to the WAPP electricity generation, its per capita consumption is critical to keeping emission at a controllable level. This immediately presents an opportunity to examine improvement in capacity and emission factors from the power plants in the member countries of WAPP. † Autarkical refers to something that is free from external control and constraint, or independent; while integration refers to something dependent or not constrained. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 25 Abiodun S. Momodu 3. Methodology 3.1. Data collection Table 1 represents WAPP member country level data as the set of basic data used to develop and run the main model (Figure 3) used in analysis in this article. These data were elicited from secondary sources, principally with institutions in West Africa related to electricity provision and regulation, namely, WAPP and ECOWAS Regional Electricity Regulatory Authority (ERERA). Other data elicited include population and its average growth rate, GDP, per capita income, average per capita electricity demand, electricity generated, average electricity tariff, generation technology type, amongst others. All these data are used on a model developed based on System Dynamics to examine the (nonlinear) relationship between generation adequacy and GHG emission reduction in the WAPP. The model evaluates the tension between providing adequate supply capacity against reducing emission from the Table 1: Installed and available capacity, average emission factor, capacity life time and time to adjust capacity in West African countries in 2015 – Base Scenario Data Average Emission Time to Installed Available Factor of Capacity Adjust Capacity, capacity, Power Plants, Lifetime Capacity Country [MW] [MW] [tCO2/MWh] [Years] [Years] Benin 205 134 0.563 25 20 Burkina Faso 219 135 0.693 25 21 Cote d’Ivoire 1,632 1,195 0.326 25 20 Gambia 100 39 0.777 25 21 Ghana 2,814 2,185 0.326 25 20 Guinea 203 109 0.793 25 21 Guinea Bissau 0 26 0.728 25 20 Liberia 23 22.6 0.568 25 21 Mali 220 86 0.580 25 20 Niger 164 138 0.867 25 21 Nigeria 10,915 5,061 0.578 25 20 Senegal 683 468 0.817 25 21 Sierra Leone 0 0 0.568 25 20 Togo 224 180 0.952 25 21 Total 17,155 9,550 Sources: [7], author estimation 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Be ni n Bu rk in a Fa so Co te d lvo ire G am bi a G ha na G ui ne a G ui ne a Bi ss au Li be ria M al i Ni ge r Ni ge ria Se ne ga l Si er ra L eo ne To go GHG Emissions (tCO2/Cap) Electricity Generated (x1000 kWh/Cap) Figure 2: Per capita electricity generation versus per capita GHG emission [8] 26 International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 Energy Use: Electricity System in West Africa and Climate Change Impact F ig ur e 3: E le ct ri ci ty P la nn in g- L ow C ar bo n D ev el op m en t V 1 M od el ( ad ap te d fr om M om od u et a l [2 ] C a p a ci ty u n d e r C o n st ru ct io n G ri d G e n e ra tio n C a p a ci ty in tit ia tin g c a p a ci ty co m p le tio n sc ra p p in g < G ri d G e n e ra tio n C a p a ci ty > < sc ra p p in g > P o p u la tio n N e t P o p u la tio n G ro w th R a te g ri d e le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra te d ta rg e t ca p a ci ty P e r C a p ita E le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra te d H is to ri ca l a n d E st im a te d G ro w th R a te f o r W e st A fr ic a < T im e > R a tio o f P e r C a p ita D e m a n d to N o rm a l P re ss u re t o A d d A d d iti o n a l C a p a ci ty tim e t o a d ju st ca p a ci ty 1 G D P ch a n g e in G D P A g g re g a te d e m a n d G o ve rn m e n t E xp e n d itu re In ve st m e n t C o n su m p tio n E xp e ct e d In co m eC h a n g e in E xp e ct e d I n co m e N o rm a l E xp e ct e d In co m e p e r ca p ita in co m e ra tio o f p e r ca p ita in co m e t o n o rm a l D e m o g ra p h y M o d u le P o w e r D e m a n d E co n o m y M o d u le E le ct ri ci ty M a rk e tin g M o d u le C a p a ci ty A d d iti o n M o d u le H is to ri ca l e m is si o n fr o m W A P P < g ri d e le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra te d > In co m e s tr e a m f ro m e le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra te d $ p e r B $G ri d B a se C a p a ci ty C u m u la tiv e E m is si o n -W A P P S ys te m cu m u la tiv e e le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra te d G ri d C a p a ci ty C o st s tr e a m f ro m e le ct ic ity g e n e ra te d W A P P S ys te m p ro fit e m is si o n r a te f ro m e le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra tio n W A P ro je ct e d e n e rg y d e m a n d P ro je ct e d c a p a ci ty re a l p e r ca p ita e le c d e m a n d < P e r C a p ita E le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra te d > C u m G ri d C a p cu m c a p u co n st ru ct io n C O 2 f o o t p ri n t fr o m e le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra tio n < P o p u la tio n > cu m u la tiv e in co m e cu m u la tiv e c o st cu m u la tiv e p ro fit cu m p e r ca p d e m a n d co n v G W h to k W h < g ri d e le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra te d > cu m g ri d e le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra te d B a se P o p u la tio n B a se G D P ce n ts t o U S $ E m is si o n E st im a tio n M o d u le < P e r C a p ita E le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra te d > < p e r ca p ita in co m e > e le ct ri ci ty in te n si ty B a se g e n e ra tio n -2 0 1 5 M W h p e r G W h < B a se P e r C a p ita E le ct ri ci ty D e m a n d > G W h to M W h p o p g ro w th ra te tim e t o a d ju st ca p a ci ty co n st ru ct io n t im e h o u rs in a ye a r ca p a ci ty f a ct o r ca p a ci ty li fe tim e e m is si o n f a ct o r g ri d e le ct ri ci ty g e n e ra tio n B a se P e r C a p ita E le ct ri ci ty D e m a n d P ro d u ct io n a d ju st m e n t tim e M a rg in a l P ro p e n si ty t o C o n su m e E xp e ct a tio n F o rm a tio n T im e O p C o sta ve ra g e t a ri ff lo ss e s n o rm a l p e r ca p ita in co m e T x C o st International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 27 Abiodun S. Momodu generation technologies in the West Africa electricity system. It arranged the complexities in the West African electricity system and established its basic interconnecting structure to conduct the analysis, in line with global expectations for reduced emission and achieve economic growth. 3.2. Model development For this study, the Electricity Planning – Low Carbon Development (EP-LCD) Model [2] was adapted and modified with its conceptualization based on [28, 29]. This is called EP-LCD v1 shown in Figure 3. To develop the structure, the boundary was set around electricity supply, generation and marketing, population and the GDP. To incorporate the study objective into the model, the study relied on a review of the operations of the WAPP electricity system as described in Article 1 of the WAPP establishing document as well as WAPP’s vision and mission that aims to make the electricity system in the ECOWAS sub-region to be operated as a merchant power market when enabling environments for this kind of operations is achieved [30, 31]. The EP-LCDv1 model (Figure 3) is largely focused on electricity operations and interconnections in the WAPP power system as well as GHG emitted from the system. The power system examined emission from the basis of generation and average emission factor as well as based on generation technology types. The dynamics are described by a set of non-linear differential equations that account for existing system feedbacks, delays, stock-and-flow structures and nonlinearities. The model is distinguished by the manner in which various sectors and spheres are connected together to form a complex link of feedback loops in which the electric system can be analyzed and weighted as driving or limiting the county’s LCD agenda. (The set of equations used in the model can be found in the appendix). A major principle in the developed SD model is the leverage points. Leverage points are places within a complex system (a corporation, an economy, a living body, a city, an ecosystem) where a small shift in one thing can produce big changes in everything [32]. Leverage points are points of power in a system that modelers not only believe in but would want to know where they are and how to locate them. There are steps to help identify places of intervention in a system [31]. The “state of the system” – electricity, a nonmaterial commodity – in whatever standing stock is of importance. The inflow – electricity generation, investment and financial flow – increase the stock, while the outflow – transmission, distribution, losses and thefts – decrease it. So the bedrock of this system consists of physical stocks and flows, obeying the laws of conservation and accumulation. Now the challenge in the WAPP power system is principally inadequacy; meaning that the inflow rate is lower than the outflow rate, making the non-storable commodity be in shortfall always. It takes time for systems to respond to desired growth as is typical for flows to accumulate. Same thing with the electricity system in WAPP, it will take time to correct the anomalies making it to be sluggish in responding to desired changes. It is critical, however, to be able to identify the ‘leverage points’ along the line of the operations of the electricity system in WAPP with the superimposed LCD models and the corrective measures to achieve desired objectives as enunciated in the objectives, vision and mission of WAPP. Systems have at least two negative feedback loops, or correcting loops [32]; one controls the inflow, and the other one controls the outflow, either or both of which can be used to bring the system to a desired level. It is important to point out that the goal and the feedback connections are not visible in the system. However, a long-term view of the system will enable one to figure out what are the leverage points in it. Now, this study involves superimposing a new paradigm – LCD – into the planning of an already complex system in WAPP, to bring out future plan that is responsive to delivering electricity that is globally cost competitive and also achieve desired reduced emission. 3.3. Brief description of model workings As an approach to understanding complex systems and their dynamic behavior, SD was used to model the West African Electricity System as it relates to other sectors. The different sectors are segmented as modules in EP- LCDv1 model as presented in Figure 3. The model was built in Vensim® using basic SD variables. It analyzed low carbon emission in the West Africa electricity system. Explaining variables is often difficult without reference to equations, but it is useful to have a complete categorization and specify conventions. Vensim® is designed so that what a variable is and does can be determined by the way it is defined or used. Vensim® has eleven variable types [33], but only those used to develop the model for this study are described here. 28 International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 Energy Use: Electricity System in West Africa and Climate Change Impact a. Auxiliary. Any dynamic variable that is computed from other variables at a given time. Auxiliaries are typically the most numerous variable type. An auxiliary variable has an expression involving other variables in its equation. b. Constant. A variable whose value does not change over time. A constant can be temporarily changed prior to simulating a model. c. Initial. Like a constant, except that it is the result of combining different variables at initialization time. d. Level. The dynamic variables in the model. Levels all have integral (INTEG) equations. e. Lookup. Nonlinear functions with numerical parameters (where the parameters are the x- and y-axis values). f. Subscript Element. An element of a Subscript Range. These identify the meaning of specific values of a subscript. The Subscript Elements appear on the right hand side of a Subscript Range equation. g. Subscript Range. Rather than repeating the same equation with different names, an one equation can be written using a subscript that takes on different values. This variable type is referred as subscripted, with one name representing more than one distinct concept. Subscript Ranges are defined using a special equation that begins with a colon (:) h. Units. Units are defined as additional information about a model variable and can be used to check the model for dimensional consistency. Units are entered as an expression in the units field of an equation. i. Unchangeable Constants. These are Constants that cannot be changed during simulation experiments. Constants and Unchangeable Constants are almost the same. The only difference is that the value for an Unchangeable Constant is determined from its equations, or read from a spreadsheet when a model is checked, and never changed after that. The model consists of interconnections of three different sectors. The sub-sectors, namely, electricity (split into capacity addition (MW) and power demand (GWh)), demography (principally the population) (Persons), economy as depicted by the gross domestic product (GDP) (Billion US$), make up the three modules in the model. There are two sub-modules in the model as offshoot from the power demand segment under the electricity module. These are: emission from electricity consumption (tCO2) and electricity marketing (US$). For this article, analysis of results from the model was limited to only the electricity module as data needed from other two modules narrowed the integrity of their results. Each of the modules has at least one Level variable with integral equation. Most level variable equations in Vensim® software take the form of: Level Variable (Name) = (inflow(t) – Outflow(t), initial_value(0) Level variables represent stocks in system dynamic models. This means that all the Level variables in the model, namely, Population, GDP, Capacity under Construction, and Grid Generation Capacity are stock operating the Principle of Accumulation*, and take on the form of Equation (1) to run in the model. Now, the critical aspect of Level variable is that it allows for the introduction of the concept of delay, a dynamic function, into the system being modeled. Being stocks, these variables have four important characteristics of having memory, changing the time shape of flows, decouple flows and create delays. The concept of delay is expatiated upon elsewhere [36]. One of the principal equation is that of Grid Generation Capacity as represented thus: Grid Generation Capacity [WAPP Member Countries] = ∫(completion [WAPP Member Countries]– scrapping [WAPP Member Countries], Grid Base Capacity [WAPP Member Countries]), Units: MW. What is placed in the [X] shows the subscripts to the equation. This allows one variable and equation to represent a number of different distinct concepts. The grid segment has capacity under construction to reflect how capacity is increased over the years. The grid capacity segment also has scrapping, which is driven principally by capacity life time (Years). The critical aspect of the capacity under construction is the assessment of initiating capacity, which in turn is driven by target capacity (MW) and time to adjust (Years). The target capacity is driven by per capita power generation in the system. The per capita power generation (kWh/Person) in the system is assumed to be driven principally by population (this is derived from the demography segment of the model). (In a fully liberalized market, this is expected to be determined by investor behavior – e.g. see [36]). It is important to state that the modules in the model are subscripted. Subscript in the modules allowed a * Accumulate: growing or increasing over time (Source: [38]) International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 29 Abiodun S. Momodu variable (e.g. grid capacity, birth rate, GDP, etc) to represent more than just a data for the variable. In this model, the subscript dealt with WAPP member country level information as well as aggregation of generation technology types in the WAPP. 3.4. Scenario development and sensitivity analysis Parameters within the model forms the basis for developing the scenarios for analysis. For this study, two scenarios on the WAPP electricity system, Base Case and LCD Options, are analyzed. The Base Case scenario represents continuing a “business-as-usual” approach that draws on technologies in the electricity system as they currently are. No consideration is given for efficiency and how these technologies fare in terms of contribution to global warming through emission of GHG into the atmosphere. The LCD Options on the other hand, draws on technologies with higher efficiency and low carbon emission to replace generation technologies that have high emitting factors. The LCD Option is examined based on changes in two parameters, namely, capacity and emission factors, against two different values of per capita electricity generation levels respectively. Other parameters are kept constant as in Base Case Scenario. To improve on the WAPP system, the LCD Option 1 was assumed to have emission factor improved by 10%, meaning EF is reduced by a factor of 0.1 from that of the Base Scenario, for each of the plants, while for LCD Option 2, it is reduced by a factor of 0.3. The model is made up of seven subscripted parameters, with the Base Case values listed in Table 1 being country level data and Table 2 being aggregated technology type in the WAPP. The high leverage points for policy intervention were identified from Tables 1 and 2. High leverage points are places within a complex system (a corporation, an economy, a living body, a city, an ecosystem) where a small shift in one thing can produce big changes in everything [32]. Further testing – sensitivity analysis – could be conducted on the model. The high leverage points form the basis for constants to conduct the sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity testing is the process of changing assumptions about the value of constants in the model and examining the resulting output [39]. With multiple parameters identified in the model as high leverage points in the model, the multivariate sensitivity simulation (MVSS) or Monte Carlo simulation is a natural choice. Four high leverage points identified in the West African electricity system are capacity factor (CF), emission factor (EF) (country average and technology type), time to adjust capacity and expectation formation. In running of the model, two parameters stood out on their effect on generation capacity addition and GDP. Literature is scarce on the issue of time to adjust capacity, which is similar to expectation formation time, therefore an explanation of these parameters is given briefly. For time to adjust capacity, usually a number of steps are taking to manage the load in a grid system. This is known as load management or demand side management. This is simply the process of balancing the supply of electricity on the network with electrical load by adjusting or controlling the load rather than the power output. However, due to the fact that generators in the network will at a time or the other come to the end of their lifetime and be disengaged from service, it is critical to also determine the time to adjust capacity. Time to adjust capacity refers to the time in planning for generation capacity when new capacity must be planned Table 2: Base Case Parameters in the EP-LCD model Normal Per Capita Time to Fuel / Capacity Capacity Capacity Constru- Emission Electricity Adjust Technology (MW) factor Lifetime ction time factor Demand Capacity Type (Dmnl) (Years) (Years) (tCO2/MWh) (MWh/Cap) (Years) Residual Fuel Oil 1410 0.48 25 3 0.2786 0.146 20 Gas 4892 0.58 25 3 0.2020 Hydropower 3760 0.54 50 10 0.0 Coal 32 0.48 25 8 0.3413 Nuclear 0 0.40 25 10 0 Sources: [1, 31, 34, 35] 30 International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 Energy Use: Electricity System in West Africa and Climate Change Impact for and be added to existing capacity to avoid overstretching the installed capacity. This is usually signaled by tight reserve margin. Reserve margin [38] is what the electricity utility industry employs as a simple strategy for maintaining reliability, i.e., always have more supply available than may be required. Yet it can be difficult to forecast future electricity demand, and building new generating capacity can take years. The industry regularly monitors the supply situation using a measure called reserve margin. Reserve margin is capacity minus demand)/demand, where “capacity” is the expected maximum available supply and “demand” is expected peak demand. It is calculated for electric systems or regions made up of a number of electric systems. For instance, a reserve margin of 15% means that an electric system has excess capacity in the amount of 15% of expected peak demand [38]. For this study, the sensitivity analysis has not been conducted in the model. 4. Result and analysis of model output based on different scenarios Comparison of the result from running the model at Base Case and LCD Options (1 and 2) respectively is presented in this section. The model was run in time space of 50 years, with 2015 as the base year and 2064 as the terminal year. The values for LCD Options parameters for the model are presented in Table 3, with its implication explained in section on low carbon development strategy in WAPP. After establishing the model structure and unit checks made, it was further validated using values gotten for WAPP in an independent study [40]. The expectation formation periods were determined at 7.5 years for the Base Case Scenario and 7 years for the LCD Option scenario. Time to adjust capacity was located at 21 and 20 years respectively, deduced from the average time it will take to construct a combined cycle gas power plant (3 years) and an allowance of 2 years for delays and its decommissioning time. In reality, these times (expectation formation and time to adjust) are missing in operating most of the power systems in the region. For example, out of the 24 documented power plants in Nigeria, only 14 were built as recent as 30 years or less ago. These power plants are only 48% of the total generation capacity, with no immediate plans of their replacement. Table 4a shows the ranges of future generation capacity in MW with projected electricity to be generated from this capacity as well as the emissions measured in billion MWh and tonnes of CO2 respectively. Table 4b gives the assumptions made for each of the scenario options using 2015 as the reference year. From the model run, weighted average emission of GHG was 27.1 million tCO2 equivalent for the Base Scenario in the 50 year period. For the two LCD Options, the average weighted average annual emissions Table 3: LCD Option Parameters in the EP-LCDv1 model LDC Option 1 LCD Option 2 Country Average Emission Average country Average Emission Average country Factor of Power plant capacity Factor, Factor of Power plant capacity Plants, [tCO2/MWh] [tCO2/MWh] Plants, [tCO2/MWh] Factor, [tCO2/MWh] Benin 0.5067 0.756 0.3941 0.81 Burkina Faso 0.6237 0.756 0.4851 0.81 Cote d’Ivoire 0.2934 0.728 0.2282 0.78 Gambia 0.6993 0.784 0.5439 0.84 Ghana 0.2934 0.756 0.2282 0.81 Guinea 0.7137 0.798 0.5551 0.855 Guinea Bissau 0.6552 0.756 0.5096 0.81 Liberia 0.5112 0.756 0.3976 0.81 Mali 0.522 0.756 0.406 0.81 Niger 0.7803 0.672 0.6069 0.72 Nigeria 0.5202 0.742 0.4046 0.795 Senegal 0.7353 0.812 0.5719 0.87 Sierra Leone 0.5112 0.672 0.3976 0.72 Togo 0.8568 0.812 0.6664 0.87 Sources: author’s assumption International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 31 Abiodun S. Momodu is 31.5 and 15.8 million tCO2 equivalent respectively. The cumulative emission for the scenarios are 1.4, 2.2 and 0.8 billion tCO2 respectively. Adopting the strategy of improved capacity and emission factors of these aged plants achieved significant reduction in emission levels as seen in the LCD option 2. 4.1. Traditional Economy versus Low Carbon Economy in the Electricity System The Paris climate change agreement entered into force on November 4, 2016, with 197 parties having ratified, accepted, approved or acceded to its instruments with the depositary. By signing the agreement, the countries committed themselves to reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions unconditionally by 20 per cent and conditionally by varying percentage in line with their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC). Some countries and regions of the world have repositioned their electricity sector to meet global challenges. This is one area amongst many that the Paris Agreement could be effected at low cost through focus on LCD strategy. The countries in the WAPP have ratified, accepted, and approved the agreement. So to achieve the NDC in West Africa, this deliberate strategic process could be adopted as a low-hanging option to contribute to the reduction of global warming. Electricity expansion in West Africa targets un- served areas to expand access. The cheapest means of this expansion is the use of fossil fuels. Taking this path to economic growth (industrialization process) unmitigated, will aggravate the already felt climate change impact in the sub-region. This could be with irreversible consequences. The fact really is that most of the current policies for developments in the sub-region are premised on the framework used in pre- industrialization era. To avoid the after-effect of such policies, it is important that the WAPP system pursues a developmental agenda that responds adequately to global climate change obligations as well as meet with this projection of future generation requirements. So WAPP as a cooperation system for electricity generation, would need to incorporate the strategies of low carbon development (LCD) in its operations to achieve a balance between development and GHG emissions . In this way, firstly, the critical challenge of the sector to achieve reduced GHG emission is addressed. Secondly, the strategies are developmental in that they will allow for increased energy access and consumption, incorporating acceptable regulatory option(s) to improve standard of living in the long-run. The generation capacity examined in the model is only that of the available capacity and not the installed capacity. Table 4a: Ranges of future generation capacity (MW), electricity generation (MWh) and CO2 emissions (tCO2) Scenario 2015 2030 2064 Base 9912 8974 13718 LCD Option: 1 9912 12108 31049 LCD Option: 2 9912 12108 31049 Base 29368 26535 40366 LCD Option: 1 44051 53797 137838 LCD Option: 2 44051 53797 137838 Base 15.3 13.8 20.9 LCD Option: 1 18.3 22.5 57.1 LCD Option: 2 16.1 19.6 50 Table 4b: Some assumptions made to estimate ranges of future generation capacity, electricity generation and CO2 emissions Assumptions Average per capita electricity Base 115 Reference year: 2015 consumption for WAPP LCD Option: 1 363 countries, MWh/cap LCD Option: 2 611 Average capacity factor for Base 0.54 Reference year: 2015 countries, ratio LCD Option: 1 0.75 LCD Option: 2 0.81 Average emission factor for Base 0.6526 WAPP countries, tCO2/MWh LCD Option: 1 0.5221 LCD Option: 2 0.4568 Expectation formation, years Base 7 LCD Option: 1 7.5 LCD Option: 2 7.5 Time to adjust capacity, years Base 21 LCD Option: 1 21 LCD Option: 2 21 32 International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 Energy Use: Electricity System in West Africa and Climate Change Impact For instance, Nigeria has an installed capacity of about 12,500 MW but can only have an available capacity of only about 40% of that to generate electricity. The reasons for the low level capacity utilization are traceable to incessant gas shortages, ill- maintained power plants, weak transmission capacity [41], vandalism, obsolete distribution network, amongst others. By merely assuming an increased capacity factor of 0.5 to that of the Base Scenario value (i.e. CF>0.5Base), the change in generation rose significantly as shown in Table 4a. 4.2. Low Carbon Development Strategy in WAPP To achieve development, energy consumption would need to be increased. This means expansion of grid capacity in generation, transmission and distribution. So at first glance as shown in Table 5, development policies will be running counter to reducing GHG emission . Thus to counter such direction is to apply low carbon development strategy. This strategy will handle tension between achieving development and reducing GHG emissions from infrastructural provision. That is, LCDS will achieve needed trade-offs between development policy and climate policy. LCDS is counterintuitive, taking cognizance of the existence of negative feedback loops. This is demonstrated in the result shown in Table 5. The Base Scenario guided how mitigation targets were set. To examine low hanging options available for achieving LCDS in the WAPP electricity system, the two other alternatives were ran for the LCD Option, namely, LCD Option 1 and 2 scenario. The first alternative considered increased efficiency in the generation capacity by a factor of 50%, through improved average capacity factor across the countries. The second alternative, considered reduced emission through reducing average emission factor across WAPP member by 30%. This is in addition to the strategy adopted in LCD option 1. In the first alternative, the system gained increased energy generation, though with Table 5: Results for generation capacity in the Base and LCD Option 1 & 2 Scenarios Country Scenario 2015 2025 2030 2035 2045 2055 2064 Unit MW Benin Base 134 110 117 125 142 162 181 LCD Option 134 141 164 191 259 351 461 Burkina Faso Base 135 105 110 115 126 137 149 LCD Option 135 136 155 177 231 301 383 Cote d’Ivoire Base 1195 926 936 947 968 990 1010 LCD Option 1195 1173 1295 1430 1743 2125 2541 Gambia Base 39 28 26 25 23 21 19 LCD Option 39 35 37 38 42 45 49 Ghana Base 2185 1797 1916 2042 2321 2637 2959 LCD Option 2185 2301 2679 3118 4225 5724 7524 Guinea Base 109 85 89 93 102 111 120 LCD Option 109 110 125 143 187 243 309 Guinea Bissau Base 26 20 20 21 21 22 22 LCD Option 26 26 28 31 38 46 55 Liberia Base 23 18 18 19 21 23 25 LCD Option 23 23 26 30 39 50 64 Mali Base 86 64 62 60 56 53 50 LCD Option 86 80 85 90 101 113 126 Niger Base 138 102 102 101 100 98 97 LCD Option 138 130 141 153 181 213 247 Nigeria Base 5061 4595 4928 5285 6079 6993 7932 LCD Option 5061 5569 6422 7406 9848 13096 16926 Senegal Base 468 333 318 304 278 254 234 LCD Option 468 480 529 582 705 853 1014 Sierra Leone Base 133 162 198 243 365 549 793 LCD Option 133 162 198 243 365 549 793 Togo Base 180 133 133 132 130 128 127 LCD Option 180 195 223 256 335 438 558 International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 33 Abiodun S. Momodu corresponding increase in emission as shown in Table 6. Still on Table 6, for LCD Option 2, when the average emission released from these plants were improved upon through across board 30% reduction in the emission factors, a reduced emission was achieved compared to merely improving the capacity factor. The energy generated in both alternatives, however, were similar. These two low-hanging alternatives analyzed were fist identified as high leverage points from conducting the base run simulation. The strategic intervention examined is for improved capacity and emission factors respectively. All other identified parameters are kept at their Base run values. For the electricity sector, this intervention is seen as low hanging option to address the trade-offs between economic development and emission reduction as options for targeting low carbon economy in West Africa. The possible barriers to achieving this intervention include but not limited to the following: (1) not being ready to promote the technical knowhow needed to achieve desired improvement in the capacity and emission factor levels amongst the existing power generation technologies across the nations in WAPP; (2) not willing to incentivize the sector to attract potential investors and innovators with adequate reward. Innovation means practices amongst the stakeholders in the WAPP system that generate electricity, to have desirable features in line with global emission reduction objectives, as in the Paris Agreement. To estimate the cost impact, only existing technologies were examined without taking into consideration environmental factor improvement such as carbon capture storage alongside the generation technology. Further, the estimate of cost impact was based on an across board average having combined the overnight cost [42, 43] for all existing generation Table 5: Emission projection from generated electricity Country 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2064 Benin_Base 226,100 185,959 211,318 240,135 272,881 306,154 Benin_LCD 271,320 285,769 387,195 524,617 710,814 934,283 Burkina_Base 280,384 219,006 239,190 261,235 285,311 308,871 Burkina_LCD 336,461 338,621 441,564 575,803 750,851 953,468 CDV_Base 1,124,299 871,223 890,825 910,868 931,362 950,201 CDV_LCD 1,349,159 1,323,769 1,614,082 1,968,063 2,399,674 2,868,496 Ganbia_Base 94,182 66,948 61,158 55,869 51,037 47,047 Gambia_LCD 113,018 101,326 110,511 120,528 131,453 142,129 Ghana_Base 2,134,793 1,755,796 1,995,228 2,267,311 2,576,496 2,890,654 Ghana_LCD 2,561,752 2,698,184 3,655,822 4,953,344 6,711,383 8,821,332 Guinea_Base 273,443 213,584 233,269 254,768 278,248 301,225 Guinea_LCD 328,132 330,238 430,633 561,549 732,265 929,866 GuBis_Base 56,727 43,958 44,947 45,958 46,992 47,943 GuBis_LCD 68,073 66,792 81,440 99,300 121,077 144,732 Liberia_Base 38,472 30,050 32,820 35,844 39,148 42,381 Liberia_LCD 46,166 46,463 60,588 79,007 103,025 130,827 Mali_Base 149,490 110,531 104,188 98,210 92,574 87,779 Mali_LCD 179,388 166,577 187,260 210,512 236,650 262,937 Niger_Base 318,737 236,206 233,207 230,246 227,322 224,723 Niger_LCD 382,484 360,709 425,192 501,203 590,801 685,057 Table 6: Results of running the EP-LCDv1 Model at different CF and EF respectively Difference Scenario 2015 2064 50 Million tCO2 Base (A) 15.28 20.9 5.62 LCD Options LCD-CF0.5 > Base_EFBase (B) 22.93 71.37 48.44 LCD-CF0.5 > Base_EF0.3 < Base (C) 18.34 57.1 38.76 34 International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 Energy Use: Electricity System in West Africa and Climate Change Impact technologies in West Africa, namely, oil, natural gas, coal and hydro. The cost impact was calculated based on construction of new power plants. Factors determining cost of electricity from new power plants include construction costs, fuel expense, environmental regulations, and financing costs. Other factors that drive power plants cost are government incentives, air emissions control on coal and natural gas. Figure 4 is the mini model developed to assess the cost impact of these trade-offs. It was assumed that compounded annual initializing (growth) rate and compounded annual scraping rate in the system will be 6% and 1.5% respectively. Cost values were taken from [37, 38]. Table 7 shows the cost impact for 2064. Total cumulative cost impact is approximately US$1.54 trillion from 2018 through to 2064. The cost impact was limited to capital, financing and fuel costs [42, 43] to estimate what is needed to achieve trade-offs in the WAPP system. This means that the total cost will be significantly higher than what is estimated here. It is pertinent to point out that the cost estimates are based on OECD standard. The cost of this same technologies from other regions may be more competitive. Now, the existing mix of generation technologies in the WAPP system consists of oil-fired, natural gas, coal and hydro plants. The generators are not new and they have aged, and over the years, have been affected by changes in technology and economics. Indeed, most of the plants in the WAPP system have units that were built decades ago as base-load stations. Though most of them are still operated as base-load*, they are best supposed to operate as cycling or peaking plants because high fuel prices and poor efficiency has made them economically marginal. This implies that the regional organization will need to get the government of WAPP member nations involved to incentivize the strategic intervention process to for LCDS. The government in this region must decide to deliberately influence the factors affecting cost of electricity to determine the kind of improvement that could be achieved in existing plants and/or power plants that would be built in the future. First of such approach would be to encourage the policy of energy efficiency through technology improvement with increased capacity factor and decreased energy intensity of economic activities that will also mean reduced emission factor. To encourage energy efficiency and decrease energy intensity of economic activities will both require increased spending on research and development on the part of government. This is currently non-existent in the West African region. Second strategy should be aimed at incentivizing construction of power plants to especially benefit base- load plants such as those that will encourage emission reduction, which are costly to build. The third approach which will be short term, say in a five year period, that will allow low carbon fuels (principally, natural gas) cost to benefit intermediate load plants as a transition * Base-load plants such as nuclear, coal, and geothermal base-load units, are expensive to build but have low fuel costs and therefore low variable costs. Other than for planned and forced maintenance, these generators will run throughout the year. Intermediate load plants, such as combined cycle units, are very efficient but use expensive natural gas as a fuel. These cycling plants will ramp up and down during the day, and will be turned on and off dozens of times a year. Peaking load plants, use combustion turbines and are relatively inefficient and burn expensive natural gas. They run only as needed to meet the highest loads. Generation Capacity initializing capacity scrapping capacity rate of scrappingrate of initializing Initial Generating Capacity cumulative generation capacity Cost Impactovernight cost MW to kW convertor Cumulative Cost Impact Figure 4: Cost impact assessment model for WAPP energy-climate change trade-offs Table 7: Cost impact of generation capacity in the WAPP system in 2064 Technology/ Overnight Cost, Capacity in Cost implication, Fuel Type $/kW (2012$) 2064, MW US$, Billion Oil-Fired 1200 4027 4.84 Natural Gas 1023 13,970 14.30 Coal 3246 91.4 0.30 Hydro 2936 10,740 31.54 Total 50.98 Sources: [42, 43] International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 35 Abiodun S. Momodu process; these category of power plants are inexpensive to build but rely on an expensive fuel. This is to encourage a quick ramp up of generation capacity to increase economic dispatch in the grid system. These strategies should however be reviewed periodically in line with determination to meet Paris Agreement on NDC for these nations. 5. Summary and Conclusion The central focus of this article is to present a developed SD model for assessing the WAPP electricity system behavior in a low carbon economy. Its principal aim is to eliminate the usual trial and error approach that characterizes policy formulation, which are usually costly and time consuming. The model presented – is adopted and modified Electricity Planning-Low Carbon Development (EP-LCD) [2] – consists of the following modules: socio-economic, electricity and LCD Option. The socio-economic module consists of variables and parameters on population and GDP; the electricity module has electricity marketing, capacity addition, power demand and LCD Option has CO2 emission estimation from electricity generation activities. For this study, the most critical sector is the capacity addition, which was linked to emission assessment from electricity generated in the system. The structure of the model was first established to ascertain the model behavior, this was followed by unit checks; the model was calibrated using values for the parameters in the mode. The data used were from WAPP. High leverage points were identified after the Base run simulation was done. Comparing results of the two scenarios: Base Case run revealed the high leverage points in the model that was used to conduct the and LCD Option runs. The high leverage points are: capacity factor, adjustment time for capacity, expectation formation and emission factor. The first three are directly or indirectly relevant to capacity addition and energy generated while the last one has relevance with emission. High leverage points are variables within the West African electricity system that are small yet could produce desired low carbon development strategy as identified in the simulation and help to situate firming of intervention for reducing environmental footprint from electricity production. The results from the model shows weighted average emission of harmful GHG to the atmosphere was 27.1 million tCO2 equivalent for the Base Scenario, while for the two LCD Options, the average weighted average annual emissions is 31.5 and 15.8 million tCO2 equivalent respectively. The cumulative emission for the scenarios are 1.4, 2.2 and 0.8 billion tCO2 respectively. Adopting an improved capacity factor for the existing power generation stocks and a reduced emission factors achieved marked reduction in emissions over the years. Estimated cost impact is approximately US$1.54 trillion from 2018 through to 2064. The cost impact of increasing generation capacity in the LCD Option was limited to capital, financing and fuel costs, meaning that the total cost could significantly higher than this. The study noted that most generators in the WAPP system have aged. They have been affected by changes in technology and economics. Indeed, most of the plants in the WAPP system have units that were built decades ago as base-load stations. Though most of them are still operated as base-load, they are best supposed to operate as cycling or peaking plants because high fuel prices and poor efficiency has made them economically marginal. The implication is that government incentives are needed to drive the process of avoiding the trajectory of industrial era in West Africa nations. A number of countries in the region have privatised their power industry. Thus government decisions to influence, or not influence, the factors affecting cost of electricity can largely determine the kind of improvement that would happen in the existing generation plants and/or power plants that would be built in the region in the future. Three of such strategies are recommended to cause improvement in existing power plants in line with Paris Agreement, reduce the cost of constructing power plants to benefit base-load plants and reduce the cost of fossil fuels to benefit intermediate load plants in the short run period to allow the ramp up of generation capacity. These should be done from between 2018 and 2030 to incentivize the market. The study concludes by recommending four strategies to encourage the implementation of energy efficiency policies, in line with the Nationally Determined Contribution in Paris Agreement. These are: a) enforcement of improved efficient electricity generation through increased energy efficiency that should result in increased capacity factor. This could be achieved through incentivizing retrofitting process; b) decreased energy intensity of the economy that should result in reduced emission factor amongst existing plants. This strategy involves rehabilitation of the 36 International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 Energy Use: Electricity System in West Africa and Climate Change Impact existing installations to elongate the lifespan of aged power plants in improved forms; c) attract new investment through low tax or tax exemption to reduce cost of constructing power plants for the benefit of base-load plants. This is to attract investment in new generations that encourage low carbon economy in the WAPP system; and d) subsidized cost of low-carbon fuels in the short run to benefit intermediate load plants and allow for the ramping up of low-/no-carbon fuel generation capacity. This is considering that construction of new power generation facilities and transmission lines require much more substantial resources than improving on their rehabilitation. These approaches are recommended considering the region’s specific economical and political conditions; funds are tremendously difficult to raise [25]. Implementing these recommendations will allow the electric power industry in West Africa to contribute to achieving sustainable development path. Acknowledgement This research is supported by funding from the Department for International Development (DfID) under the Climate Impact Research Capacity and Leadership Enhancement (CIRCLE) programme. The research to develop the adopted model was conducted at The Energy Centre, College of Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana. References [1] UNEP (2011). Low Carbon Development Strategies: A Primer on Framing Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) in Developing Countries. Accessed from http://mitigationpartnership.net/unep-2011-low-carbon- development-strategies-primer-framing-namas-developing- countries on July 7 2014 [2] Momodu, A. S, Addo, A., Akinbami, J-F. K. and Mulugetta, Y. (2017) Low Carbon Development Strategy for the West African Electricity System: Preliminary Assessment using System Dynamic Approach. Energy, Sustainability and Society, Volume 7:11, 1–23; DOI 10.1186/s13705-017- 0113–Ω4 [3] Worldometers (2017) Western Africa Population http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/western- africa-population/ accessed August 18 2017. [4] AFD (Agence France de Developmente) (____) AFRICAPOLIS: Urbanization Trends in West Africa 1950- 2020 accessed from https://www.oecd.org/countries/nigeria/ 48485370.pdf on 11 May 2017 [5] Nations Online Project accessed from – http://www.nations online.org/oneworld/map/west-africa-map.htm accessed 26 April 2017 [6] World Bank (2017) Gross domestic Product 2015, World Development Indicators database, accessed from databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdf on 12 May 2017 [7] WAPP (2011). West African Power Pool – http://www. ecowapp.org/?page_id=6 [8] WAPP (2014) Feasibility study for development of a regional grid emission factor for the West African Power Pool (WAPP) as a standardised baseline. Report for WAPP Secretariat, Cotonou, Benin Republic [9] IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp. [10] UN (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Retrieved from www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm on March 18 2015 [11] Gupta, S., Tirpak, D. A., Burger, N., Gupta, J., Höhne, N., Boncheva, A. I., Kanoan, G. M., Kolstad, C., Kruger, J. A., Michaelowa, A., Murase, S., Pershing, J., Saijo, T., and Sari, A. (2007). Policies, instruments and co-operative arrangements. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK [12] Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM), 2014. Stimulating the demand for REDD+ emission reductions in Brazil: The need for a strategic intervention pre 2020: a case study for the Interim Forest Finance Project. Written by the Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM), Brasilia, Brazil. Published by Global Canopy Programme, Oxford, UK. [13] Schneider, S. H. (1989). The greenhouse effect: Science and policy. Science 243: 771–81. [14] Cervigni, R., Rogers, J. A. and Dvorak, I. (eds.) (2013). Assessing Low-Carbon Development in Nigeria: An Analysis of Four Sectors. World Bank Study. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-9973-6. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 [15] Momodu A. S. (2012) Evaluation of long term performance of electric power system in Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria http://mitigationpartnership.net/unep-2011-low-carbon-development-strategies-primer-framing-namas-developing-countries http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/western-africa-population/ https://www.oecd.org/countries/nigeria/48485370.pdf http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/map/west-africa-map.htm http://www.ecowapp.org/?page_id=6 www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdf International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Vol. 14 2017 37 Abiodun S. Momodu [16] Olsina F, Garcés F, Haubrich HJ (2006) Modeling long-term dynamics of electricity markets. Energy Policy 34(12): 1411–1433 [17] Jimenez, R., and Yépez-García, A. (2016). Composition and Sensitivity of Residential Energy Consumption. Inter- American Development Bank. [18] Meier, H., Jamasb, T., and Orea, L. (2013). Necessity or luxury good? Household energy spending and income in Britain 1991-2007. The Energy Journal, 34(4), 109–129. [19] Erbaykal, E. (2008). Disaggregate Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from Turkey. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics ISSN 1450-2887 Issue 20. EuroJournals Publishing, Inc. accessed from http://www.eurojournals.com/finance.htm on March 4, 2011 [20] Ciarreta, A. and Zarraga, A. (2006). Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from Spain. Accessed from www.ecomod.org/files/papers/89.pdf – on March 5, 2011 [21] Aqeel, A. and Butt, M. S. (2001). The relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Pakistan. Asia- Pacific Development Journal – Vol. 8, No 2, December 2001 accessed from http://www.unescap.org/drpad/publication/ journal_8_2/AQEEL.PDF on March 4, 2011 [22] Liu, Y., Gao, Y., Hao, Y., & Liao, H. (2016). The Relationship between Residential Electricity Consumption and Income: A Piecewise Linear Model with Panel Data. Energies, 9(10), 831 [23] (Martin, 1996) [24] CDC and ODI (2016) What are the links between power, economic growth and job creation?. Accessed from http://www.cdcgroup.com/Documents/Evaluations/Power%2 0economic%20growth%20and%20jobs.pdf on 7 July 2017 [25] Gnansounou, E., Bayem, H., Bednyagin, D., and Dong, J. (2007). Strategies for regional integration of electricity supply in West Africa. Energy policy, 35(8), 4142–4153. [26] Gebremicael, M, Yuan, H. and Tomsovic, K (2009). “Use of system dynamics for studying a restructured West African power pool,” 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Calgary, AB, 2009, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.1109/ PES.2009.5275368 [27] Aissatou, N., Rabani, A., Moussa, G. and Arona, D. 2017) Global Warming and Heat Waves in West-Africa: Impacts on Electricity Consumption in Dakar (Senegal) and Niamey (Niger). International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science, 2(1): 16–26 [28] Zagonel AA, Corbet TF (2006) Levels of confidence in System dynamic modeling: a pragmatic approach to assessment of dynamic models. 24th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Nijmegen, The Netherlands. http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2006/proceed/p apers/ZAGON374.pdf [29] Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin McGraw Hill, Boston [30] WAPP (2005) Articles of Agreement Of The West African Power Pool Organization and Functions. Accessed from www.ecowapp.org/sites/default/files/articles_of_agreement_ 0.pdf on 30 June 2017 [31] WAPP (2012) Business plan – 2012–2015. www. ecowapp.org/?dl_id=384. Accessed 16 Mar 2015 [32] Meadows D (1999) Leverage points: places to intervene in a system. Sustainability Institute. Retrieved from http:// donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to- intervene-in-a-system/. on March 18 2015 [33] Ventana Systems, Inc (2013) Vensim manual [34] World Bank (2009) World Bank Studies—Getting, Low Carbon Growth Country. “Started. Experience from Six Countries” Accessed from www.esmap.org on July 1 2013 [35] World Bank (2013) Assessing Low-Carbon Development in Nigeria An Analysis of Four Sectors. World Bank Publication Edited by Cervigni, R., Rogers, J. A. and Dvorak, I. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/.../782810REP LACEM00Box377...on 15 June 2015 [36] Kilanc, P.G. and Or, I. (2008). A decision support tool for the analysis of pricing, investment and regulatory processes in a decentralized electricity market. Energy Policy 36 (2008) 3036–3044 [37] Brander M, Sood A, Wylie C, Haughton A., and Lovell J (2011) Technical paper| Electricity-specific emission factors for grid electricity. Ecometrica, Emissionfactors. com. [38] EIA (2015) Electric generator capacity factors vary widely across the world. Accessed from http://www. eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=22832# on 15 September 2016 [39] Hekimoğlu, M.and Barlas, Y (2010) Sensitivity analysis of System dynamics models by behavior pattern measures. Retrieved on March 18 2015 fromwww.systemdynamics .org/conferences/2010/proceed [40] FGN (2017) Economic recovery and growth plan: 2017 – 2020. A publication of the Ministry of Budget and National, Abuja. Accessed from ... on 16 March 2017 [41] Ogundari, I. O., Akinwale, Y. O., Adepoju, A. O., Atoyebi, M. K., and Akarakiri, J. B. (2017). Suburban Housing Development and Off-Grid Electric Power Supply Assessment for North-Central Nigeria. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 12, 47–63. [42] EIA, U. (2013). Updated capital cost estimates for utility scale electricity generating plants. US Energy Inf. Adm, 524. [43] Kaplan, S. (2011). Power plants: Characteristics and costs. DIANE Publishing. http://www.eurojournals.com/finance.htm http://www.unescap.org/drpad/publication/journal_8_2/AQEEL.PDF http://www.cdcgroup.com/Documents/Evaluations/Power%20economic%20growth%20and%20jobs.pdf http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2006/proceed/papers/ZAGON374.pdf http://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/ www.ecowapp.org/sites/default/files/articles_of_agreement_0.pdf www.esmap.org http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=22832# www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2010/proceed www.ecowapp.org/?dl_id=384 www.ecomod.org/files/papers/89.pdf https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/.../782810REPLACEM00Box377... << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /All /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 20%) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Warning /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Tags /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJDFFile false /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.0000 /ColorConversionStrategy /LeaveColorUnchanged /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments false /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 300 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /Description << /CHS /CHT /DAN /DEU /ESP /FRA /ITA /JPN /KOR /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken voor kwaliteitsafdrukken op desktopprinters en proofers. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /PTB /SUO /SVE /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents for quality printing on desktop printers and proofers. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /ConvertColors /NoConversion /DestinationProfileName () /DestinationProfileSelector /NA /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /PresetSelector /MediumResolution >> /FormElements false /GenerateStructure true /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles true /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /NA /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /LeaveUntagged /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice