Brasher, T., Rosen, D., & Spinella, M. (2023). Psychedelics and psychological strengths. International Journal of Wellbeing, 13(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v13i1.2325 Trey Brasher Stockton University treybrasher@gmail.com Copyright belongs to the author(s) www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 1 ARTICLE Psychedelics and psychological strengths Trey Brasher · David Rosen · Marcello Spinella Abstract: Classical psychedelics appear efficacious in improving psychological well-being in randomized clinical trials, but their effects in the population at large are relatively unknown. In the present paper, which includes three studies conducted by online survey with a collective 3,157 participants, classical psychedelic users showed greater psychological strengths and well-being, and lower levels of distress, after controlling for demographic variables, respondents’ beliefs about the potential benefits of psychedelics, and their use of other psychoactive drugs. These benefits contrast with patterns for cannabis and alcohol users, both of whom showed comparatively maladaptive profiles. Reported relationships between psychedelic use and the combined index of psychological strengths was fully mediated by self- transcendence. We show an effect of motivation for psychedelic use, where those who reported a ‘growth’ motivation showed the most robustly adaptive psychological profile. Psychedelic users reported more lifetime meditation experience, and within psychedelic users, greater frequency of use correlated with greater hours of lifetime seated meditation practice. Meditation experience did not account for the differences in strengths, well-being, and distress. In these studies, psychedelic users showed an adaptive psychological pattern on a wider array of strengths than previously studied, which were not attributable to several salient covariates. While causality cannot be inferred from this study, findings align with and advance past research which provides evidence for the potential benefits associated with psychedelics. Keywords: psychedelics; positive psychology; psychological strengths; mindfulness; self- transcendence; entheogens 1. Introduction There is a current resurgence in the research and clinical applications of classical psychedelics119, namely psilocybin, DMT/ayahuasca, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), mescaline, and analogous drugs, which have common pharmacodynamic mechanisms as agonists at the 5-HT2a receptor116. In addition to experimental and clinical trials, these drugs have been widely used in the general population. In the United States alone, the estimated lifetime prevalence of use is about 10% of the population, or approximately 32 million individuals85. Classical psychedelics have been shown to produce long-lasting trait changes in certain aspects of personality, which were thought to be relatively stable across the lifetime79,91. Notably, psychological changes derived from a single psychedelic experience in the context of clinical trials can last between 4-14 months56,58,76,148,177, and some research suggests changes may persist longer than currently demonstrated, even up to a lifetime43. In this prospective survey-based study, we attempt to expand upon the set of psychological traits conceivably altered by psychedelic use. about:blank Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 2 2. Background Psychedelics have been associated with a range of both state- and trait-level psychological characteristics 79. Pre/post changes in the following areas have been shown in trials of psychedelic- assisted psychotherapy: improvements in mood/positive affect84,141, increased overall well- being56,133,141,158,167, increased openness29,78,103,142, increased mindfulness61,104,135,147, increased empathy44 increased meaning in life141 , decreased depression3,55,57 and anxiety63 , and decreased substance misuse3,51,53. A number of these findings were explicit therapeutic targets for the clinical trials, others unanticipated and oblique to the stated aims, while nonetheless psychologically beneficial, and attributable to the psychedelic experience in a therapeutic setting103. These findings raise the possibility that the use of classical psychedelics in non-clinical contexts also might lead to lasting trait changes. Preliminary research suggests this might be the case. Changes in the following traits have been shown pre/post treatment with psychedelics in a structured but naturalistic setting (e.g. an ayahuasca ceremony): increased acceptance151, increases in trait self- transcendence17,19, improved physical health8, increased meaning in life17, increased mindfulness152, increased self-compassion135, increases in both agreeableness and openness8, decreased substance misuse157, decreased physical pain7, and improved convergent and divergent thinking181. In these non-clinical experimental settings, as with clinical settings, changes in psychological traits often persist, sometimes for years1,9,17,26,56,101. Prospective studies, conducted by online surveys, have reported relationships between the use of psychedelics in a naturalistic setting and changes on a largely overlapping set of psychological measures, as shown in clinical trials and non-clinical experimental settings. Previously reported differences include an increased sense of meaning in life59,77, increased self- compassion153, increased prosociality72,168,179, increased empathy95, increased openness117, greater overall well-being24, greater life satisfaction24, and less substance misuse77. Of these studies, only Lerner & Lyvers (2006)95, Walsh et al. (2016)168 and Hendricks et al. (2018)71 report findings comparing psychedelic users to non-users, and only Hendricks et al. (2018)72 reports findings from a large sample of the United States population. These psychological attributes, potentially altered by the use of classical psychedelics, are generally associated with greater overall psychological well-being in the psychological literature, as well as in the psychedelic literature specifically79,123. Beyond these changes, naturalistic (e.g. non-clinical) psychedelic use in US population level samples is associated with an equal or reduced instance of mental health problems, psychological distress, and suicidality70,74. The aggregate psychedelic literature suggests the potential for increases in positive psychological traits56,79 as well as possible reductions in psychological maladies58,70. Psychedelics dose-dependently produce distinct neural correlates and a concomitant subjective experience variously called a peak experience82, mystical experience60, self- transcendence128, or ego dissolution91,92,110. This type of unitive experience entails a constellation of subjective correlates including feelings of a dissolution of the boundaries between self and other, subject and object, the self and the external world, and a sense of union with something larger than oneself27. In modern literature, self-transcendence and ego dissolution are often used interchangeably128. While self-transcendence is generally measured as an acute state, psychedelic use has also been found to increase trait self-transcendence, a more enduring aspect of self- identification with a larger whole17,19. State self-transcendence scores are reliably positively correlated with clinical outcomes3,15,39,51,91,117, 110,132,133. Particularly germane in the context of this paper, the degree of participants’ self-transcendence or ego dissolution experiences correlated with long term positive psychological effects beyond the scope of explicitly desired clinical outcome(s)58,76,148. Naturalistic psychedelic users appear to experience similarly meaningful peak http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 3 experiences as those demonstrated in clinical settings35,59,60,102,180 which also mediate positive outcomes52,77. Second-wave psychedelic studies report mostly positive psychological effects. It should be noted that this is not always the case. Negative affect, including extreme anxiety and fear are reportedly common during psychedelic experiences (39%), which include a clinical setting58. Other studies report ‘challenging experiences’ in 40% of participants in a clinical setting51. In an online self-report survey study with a large sample size (n = 1993), 8% of participants indicated that their psychedelic experience(s) actually decreased their life satisfaction and well-being 24. It is strongly suspected that in rare cases naturalistic psychedelic use can provide a stressor that leads to a psychotic break in users predisposed to psychosis32,183,184,185. Despite this suspicion, both past and current studies investigate(d) psychedelics for the potential treatment of psychosis186. 3. Purpose/hypotheses Several lasting trait level changes have been shown in the psychedelic literature, however, subjective reports of psychedelic use, such as those found on reddit.com/psychedelics or erowid.org/experiences, can include a wider array of benefits and drawbacks than the ones established to date by quantitative studies136. These indicate effects of psychedelic use may not be limited to hitherto measured domains. Most studies focus on one or two key psychological traits that may indicate treatment efficacy79. The aim of this study was to replicate traits altered in clinical trials in a larger survey-based sample while measuring an expanded array of traits that might be associated with psychedelic use. The present studies were undertaken in an iterative manner for the accrual and honing of a battery of psychological traits which might be associated with the use of classical psychedelics as well as internal replications of such findings. The rationale for including three studies is to indicate the way in which multiple studies homed in on a battery of traits that seemed to replicate and remain consistently different between psychedelic users and non-users. In Study 1, we began by establishing links between psychedelic use and well-being and mindfulness measures, as well as measures of self-transcendence, all previously shown in the literature to be significantly altered by psychedelic experience(s), as well as some exploratory measures. In Study 2, we expanded mindfulness and related measures, replicated well-being and self-transcendence measures, and added exploratory measures of maladaptive social functioning. We also expanded covariates and introduced a comparison between psychedelic users and users of cannabis and alcohol to ascertain if the psychedelic profile appeared unique. In Study 3, we included the widest range of traits for which we previously saw associations, applied both the covariates and cannabis/alcohol comparisons, and conducted a meditation analysis to see if, like in clinical research, differences were mediated by the degree of self-transcendence. We inquired into participants’ ‘motivation’ for psychedelic use, analyzed the differences between intentions, and added beliefs about psychedelics as covariates. We apply the terms “adaptive” and “maladaptive” to indicate directionality in all study analyses and the final figure. “Adaptive” indicates differences in a direction shown to contribute to psychological health, and “maladaptive” indicates differences in a direction shown to be associated with poorer psychological health. Based on previously reported findings in the literature, we hypothesized that lifetime psychedelic users would score significantly higher on adaptive psychological traits as well as significantly lower on maladaptive traits, while controlling for salient covariates, and that differences in these traits would be mediated by self-transcendence. Further, we predicted that http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 4 the intention among psychedelic users to use the substances for personal growth, as opposed to fun/recreation, would predict the largest differences in psychological strengths. 4. Participant recruitment Participants were recruited via email and social media by undergraduate students at a northeastern university who received a small amount of course credit for participation as well as participant recruitment, where not participating had no effect on students’ course grades. Participants were naive to the purpose of the studies. Students could send a link to the survey via email or social media to up to ten individuals unrelated to the class, as well as fill it out themselves. It was specified that participants must be community-dwelling adults, age 18-years or older. This type of sample recruitment allowed for a more demographically diverse sample (in terms of age, education level, etc.) than limiting the sample to college students or online psychedelic-themed forums, as well as a greater diversity of opinions and attitudes surrounding psychedelics. A link to a Google Forms survey was provided that had an informed consent, demographic questions (age, sex, years of formal education, religious affiliation, and lifetime hours of meditation), and a survey that was approved by the Stockton University Institutional Review Board, in accordance with the ethical principles of the American Psychological Association and the Declaration of Helsinki. Data were imported into SPSS to be analyzed. Effect sizes are reported as partial eta squared values from SPSS in accordance with the cutoff values suggested by Cohen, 201333 . To improve data validity, two instructed response items were included in the survey (e.g. “Please click on number 5 for this item.”) Participants who did not answer both items correctly were dropped from analyses. Further, extreme univariate outliers (>3.0 SD beyond the mean) were also dropped from analyses36,108. Rather than studies specifically targeting psychedelic users and relying on pre- vs. post- treatment self-reported changes3,59, we gathered large samples without indicating the purpose of the study. This allowed direct comparison between psychedelic users and non-users. Since experimental and clinical trials tend to have limited sample sizes, correlational studies may help establish if those results are seen in larger populations. Correlational studies can also investigate whether any of the findings of clinical trials are found when a controlled clinical setting and trained clinician are not present37,139. Second generation psychedelic research findings are potentially skewed toward positive results given participant recruitment in clinical trials relies on self-selection and often targeted social media ad campaigns - all but ensuring participants have a positive view of psychedelics. Previous survey studies3,52,59 have recruited almost exclusively from psychedelic-related internet forums and social media platforms targeting psychedelic users. While these types of studies can provide proof of concept-style evidence, the present studies utilized broader samples, including both users and non-users. Further, the psychedelic users in these samples were not limited to those who are self-motivated to use specialized psychedelic internet forums, or those who are algorithmically selected for social media advertisement targeting based on a history of interest in psychedelics. While our recruitment method is a type of convenience sample, the lack of targeting and hidden purpose of the study insulates the results from the types of biases pervasive in even well designed modern psychedelic studies. Larger samples allow for greater statistical power in analyses and controlling for the potential influence of several demographic or other social and behavioral confounds. A particularly salient confound is the influence of the use of other psychoactive drugs, which may not be uncommon among psychedelic users115 . If so, then other studies have, in effect, been evaluating polydrug users and not controlling for these extraneous and confounding effects, rather than isolating the influence of classic psychedelic use. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 5 5. Study 1 The goal of Study 1 was to establish whether people who have used classical psychedelics one or more times show greater well-being and mindfulness than non-users across measures. This study also examined self-transcendence using a variety of validated measures. Increases in trait mindfulness have been reported after use in both laboratory and naturalistic settings56,59,61,148. There appear to be phenomenological similarities99 , neurophysiological similarities111, and mindfulness meditation and the psychedelic experiences have been shown to combine to synergic effect146 . Long-term meditation practice is associated with greater self-transcendence, and both long term meditation and the use of classical psychedelics have been associated with altered connectivity of the default mode network (DMN)164,175 . Models have shown self- transcendence, mindfulness, self-compassion, and emotion regulation are interrelated, collectively reducing negative emotion and increasing psychological well-being166 . Given these overlaps we sought to examine the relationships between psychedelic use and self- transcendence, mindfulness, compassion for oneself and others, positive and negative affect, and life satisfaction. It was hypothesized that psychedelic users, compared to non-users, would demonstrate higher scores on these measures, apart from negative affect, after controlling for demographic influences and meditation experience. 5.1 Methods 5.1.1 Survey completion, demographics, and measures Participants (N = 465) completed demographic and characteristic surveys (see Supplement 1), as well as psychological well-being surveys with measures including but not limited to measures of self-transcendence, positive psychological and psychological distress measures (see Supplement 2 for a full list). All measures, unless otherwise specified, used a 7-point Likert-type scale to provide consistency across items. Where possible, shorter scales, or shorter versions, were chosen to maximize the array of constructs measured and minimize participant burden. Intrascale reliabilities (Cronbach’s α) obtained in this sample are reported here for all relevant scales. See Supplement 1 for survey completion statistics and demographic information and Supplement 2 for a full list of questions/scales included. 5.1.2 Procedure The procedure for all 3 studies is described in the introduction. Participant data and validity are detailed in Supplement 1 for all three studies. 5.1.3 Data transformation Data were inspected for skewness before statistical testing. Since the statistical tests to be used (e.g. MANCOVA) assume a normal distribution, any variables with a considerable degree of skewness (> .3 or < -.3) were subjected to data transformation in order to normalize their distribution157 . All scores for all scales were converted into standardized scores and then T-scores (M = 50, SD = 10) to serve a standard for comparison across measures with different scoring systems157 . See Supplement 5 for details. 5.2 Results 5.2.1 Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). An ANCOVA controlling for age, sex, and education showed that psychedelic users reported more hours of lifetime meditation practice than non-users [F(1,460) = 3.86, p > .001, ηp² = .04], M http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 6 = 814.0 SD = 2428.3 vs. M = 231.0 SD = 1538.3, respectively. Thus, lifetime meditation experience was used as a covariate, along with demographic variables, in the subsequent analysis to disentangle that behavior from any results obtained. See Supplement 4 for full ANCOVA. 5.2.1 Multivariate Analyses of Covariance (MANCOVA). A MANCOVA was performed to examine differences between lifetime psychedelic users vs. nonusers to more conservatively protect against both Type I error and the chance that covariables were influencing the outcome. This result was significant, F(11,445) = 3.71, p <= .001; Wilk's Λ = .92, ηp² = .08. The MANCOVA controlled for the covariates of age, sex, education, having a religious affiliation, and lifetime hours of meditation. Significant differences in the predicted direction were observed for all measures except mindfulness. See Table 1 for results. Psychedelic Psychedelic Users Nonusers M (SE) M (SE) F ηp² Directionality Mysticism 54.1 (1.3) 49.2 (.5) 6.47‡ .10 A Inclusive Identity 53.9 (1.2) 49.3 (.5) 8.54‡ .13 A Self-Transcendence 50.7 (1.2) 49.7 (.5) 6.32‡ .10 A Mindfulness 50.6 (1.2) 50.0 (.5) 1.20 - - Equanimity 53.0 (1.2) 49.6 (.5) 7.19‡ .11 A Kindness (FSA) 52.1 (1.3) 49.6 (.5) 3.97‡ .07 A Self-Compassion 53.2 (1.2) 49.4 (.5) 9.64‡ .15 A Life Satisfaction 50.3 (1.2) 50.0 (.5) 5.87‡ .09 A Positive Affect 50.5 (1.2) 49.8 (.5) 3.81‡ .06 A Negative Affect 49.5 (1.2) 50.1 (.5) 2.46* .04 A *A = Adaptive, M = Maladaptive Table 1. Study 1 MANCOVA of differences between psychedelic users (n = 72) and non-users (n = 392) on psychological strengths and affect. Means and standard errors (in parentheses) are provided. Analysis is controlling for age, sex, education, religious affiliation, antianxiety/antidepressant medication, and lifetime meditation hours. Significance: *p <= .05, †p <= .01, ‡p <= .001. Bold indicates medium-large effect size. 5.3 Discussion These results are consistent with the hypothesis that psychedelics are associated with greater well-being and psychological traits linked to it. Consistent with clinical trials, psychedelic users showed greater self-transcendence on three different scales, greater positive emotion, and less negative emotion. They further showed greater mindful acceptance (i.e. equanimity), kind attitudes towards others, self-compassion, and overall life satisfaction. These are adaptive characteristics that link to greater well-being across multiple domains166. Contrary to predictions, no differences were found in mindful awareness. Effect sizes were moderate apart from a small effect size for negative affect and large effect sizes for inclusive identity and self-compassion. By statistically controlling for demographic factors and meditation experience, we eliminate possible confounds. This approach particularly critical for meditation, since the subjective results of meditation practices and psychedelic use share some overlap111. Indeed, psychedelic users in this http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 7 sample reported substantially more meditation experience than non-users, but this difference was not responsible for the group differences observed. 6. Study 2 The goal of Study 2 was to replicate and expand the findings of Study 1 regarding psychological measures associated with psychedelic use. Study 2 expanded mindfulness and related measures. The measure of mindfulness used in Study 1 (PM.awa) explicitly focuses on awareness of thoughts and emotions. In contrast, the items of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) deal with the degree of mind wandering23. The MAAS has been demonstrated to relate to functional connectivity in the DMN13,45; both psychedelics and mindfulness alone, as well as in concert, are known to modulate connectivity in the DMN with lasting effects148; For this reason, the MAAS may present a relevant measure related to potential alterations in the DMN, whose structure and function relate to the degree of self-transcendence reported19,28. On this evidence we suspect the MAAS may be more sensitive to psychedelic related alterations. We measured gratitude with the G3, forgiveness with the TTF22 , and humility with the HUM. These are three psychological strengths consistently associated with greater mental and physical well-being and potentially associated with psychedelic use172,173,174. Study 2 added exploratory measures of maladaptive social functioning. Greed, malicious envy, and chronic hostility are indicative of maladaptive patterns that relate to poorer cognitive, emotional, and social functioning, as well as physical health89,109,112,145. Study 2 replicated and expanded well-being and self-transcendence measures. Meaning in life and life satisfaction are overarching aspects of functioning that relate to multiple psychological strengths and adaptive functioning in many aspects of life41,69,125. Psychological well-being, health, and sleep quality are interrelated, with psychological strengths possibly exerting influence on well-being through health behaviors, physiological processes, and/or coping ability122,154. Perceived social support and perceived health were measured rather than attempting to measure actual support or health since perceived aspects involve psychological interpretation of events and are more closely tied to well-being64,107,134. Whereas Study 1 inquired about attitudes of kindness, we sought to examine whether this translated into prosocial behavior. We inquired about the number of days per month, on average, people spent a significant part of their day volunteering or helping others. We inquired about the lifetime use of other psychoactive drugs. Use of one class of psychoactive substances has been shown to predict increased odds of using others140. This highlights the likelihood that many psychedelic users may have used other categories of psychoactive drugs. To determine whether the characteristics associated with psychedelic users are specific to psychedelic use, it would be necessary to control for the potentially confounding effects of the concomitant use of other psychoactive substances. Beyond controlling for substance use, Study 2 expanded covariates by introducing a comparison between psychedelic users and users of cannabis and alcohol to ascertain if the psychedelic profile appeared unique. Income and work status were also gathered as covariates. It was again hypothesized that psychedelic users would score higher in measures of well- being, mindfulness, self-transcendence and volunteering behavior and lower in maladaptive characteristics (greed, malicious envy, and chronic hostility) relative to non-users and that these differences would again be independent of demographic variables as well as lifetime non- medical use of other classes of psychoactive drugs (alcohol, cannabis, opioids, sedatives, 3,4- methylenedioxymethamphetamine [MDMA], dissociative, and major stimulants). It was http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 8 hypothesized the profile for psychedelic users would be distinct compared with cannabis and alcohol users. 6.1 Methods 6.1.1 Survey completion, demographics, and measures Same as Study 1, see Supplement 1 for survey completion and demographics and Supplement 2 for measures. The final sample was N = 1550. 6.1.2 Procedure The procedures for participant recruitment, data collection, response validity, and data transformation were the same as in Study 1. See Supplemental Material 1 for transformations 156. To assess lifetime and recent psychoactive drug use, participants were inquired about their lifetime use of opioids, major stimulants, cannabis, MDMA, sedatives, classic psychedelics, and dissociatives (ketamine or PCP). The questions specified non-medical use only. Participants were asked to estimate the number of times they used each class of drug using a Likert-type ordinal scale (Never = 0, Once or twice = 1, 3-10 times = 2, 11-19 times = 3, 20-50 times = 4, 51-99 times = 5, 100+ times = 6), which was also used to dichotomize into those who had ever vs. never used a drug in each category. 6.2 Results 6.2.1 Psychoactive drug usage See Supplement 1. 6.2.2 Correlations Non-parametric, Spearman’s rho (df = 1548) tests were used to correlate use of psychedelics and other drugs since ordinal ratings were used. Correlations were significant and positive between psychedelic use and use of all other classes of drugs (p < .001). This indicates the need for controlling for the use of other non-psychedelic classes of drugs as covariates in the subsequent analyses. See Supplement 3. 6.2.3 Multivariate analyses of covariance A MANCOVA examining differences between psychedelic users versus nonusers on the well- being measures was significant [F(14,1496) = 2.38, p = .003; Wilk's Λ = .98, ηp² = .02]. The MANCOVA controlled for the covariates of age, sex, education, ethnicity, affiliation with a religion, student status, and the non-medical use of other classes of drugs(major stimulants, sedatives, opioids, cannabis, MDMA, and alcohol). Significant differences were observed on all well-being measures except for sleep quality. All measures, except for perceived social support, were in the predicted direction, i.e. showing a relatively more adaptive pattern in psychedelic users. See Table 2 (below) for results. 6.2.4 Cannabis To compare these results with cannabis use, a MANCOVA was performed to examine differences between cannabis users versus nonusers on the well-being measures, controlling for demographic variables and use of other psychoactive drugs. This result was significant for cannabis use [F(14,1496) = 3.24, p <= .001; Wilk's Λ = .97, ηp² = .03]. The MANCOVA controlled for http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 9 the covariates of age, sex, education, ethnicity, affiliation with a religion, student status, and the non-medical use of other non-cannabis classes of drugs (major stimulants, sedatives, opioids, psychedelics, MDMA, and alcohol). Significant differences were seen in all measures except sleep quality, with effect sizes ranging from small to medium. Differences were in the adaptive direction on six measures and maladaptive on the remaining six measures. See Table 2 and Figure 3 for results. Psychedelics Cannabis Alcohol Users Non- users Users Non- users Users Non- users M (SE) M (SE) F D M (SE) M (SE) F D M (SE) M (SE) F D Mindfulness 51.5 (0.8) 49.6 (0.3) 8.60‡ ↑ 49.8 (0.3) 50.1 (0.4) 8.60‡ ↓ 49.8 (0.3) 50.1 (0.5) 8.31‡ ↓ Equanimity 50.8 (0.8) 49.8 (0.3) 10.07‡ ↑ 49.6 (0.3) 50.5 (0.4) 10.07‡ ↓ 49.6 (0.3) 50.6 (0.5) 10.07‡ ↓ Gratitude 51.2 (0.8) 49.7 (0.3) 3.58‡ ↑ 50.1 (0.3) 49.7 (0.5) 3.58‡ ↑ 49.9 (0.3) 50.0 (0.5) 3.54‡ ↓ Forgiveness 50.6 (0.8) 49.9 (0.3) 3.91‡ ↑ 49.7 (0.3) 50.6 (0.5) 3.91‡ ↓ 50.3 (0.3) 49.4 (0.5) 3.99‡ ↑ Humility 51.9 (0.8) 49.7 (0.3) 3.23‡ ↑ 50.5 (0.3) 49.4 (0.4) 3.23‡ ↑ 49.6 (0.3) 51.1 (0.5) 3.13‡ ↓ Perceived Support 49.5 (0.8) 50.4 (0.3) 2.42‡ ↓ 50.2 (0.3) 50.4 (0.5) 2.42‡ ↓ 50.4 (0.3) 50.0 (0.5) 2.45‡ ↑ Inclusive Identity 51.1 (0.8) 49.8 (0.3) 3.26‡ ↑ 50.7 (0.3) 48.8 (0.5) 3.26‡ ↑ 50.0 (0.3) 49.9 (0.5) 3.24‡ ↑ Self-trans. 52.7 (0.8) 49.4 (0.3) 4.63‡ ↑ 50.4 (0.3) 49.2 (0.4) 4.63‡ ↑ 49.9 (0.3) 50.1 (0.5) 4.59‡ ↓ Sleep Quality 50.2 (0.8) 50.1 (0.3) 1.51 50.0 (0.3) 50.2 (0.5) 1.51 50.5 (0.3) 49.4 (0.5) 1.6 Perceived Health 51.1 (0.8) 50.2 (0.3) 1.69* ↑ 50.5 (0.3) 50.1 (0.5) 1.69* ↑ 50.8 (0.3) 49.4 (0.5) 2.05† ↑ Volunteering 50.4 (0.8) 49.9 (0.3) 2.51‡ ↑ 49.3 (0.3) 51.0 (0.5) 2.51‡ ↓ 49.8 (0.3) 50.2 (0.5) 2.40‡ ↓ Greed 48.1 (0.8) 50.3 (0.3) 13.36‡ ↓ 50.5 (0.3) 49.1 (0.4) 13.36‡ ↑ 50.8 (0.3) 48.4 (0.4) 12.97‡ ↑ Envy 48.0 (0.8) 50.0 (0.3) 9.23‡ ↓ 49.6 (0.3) 50.0 (0.4) 9.23‡ ↓ 50.3 (0.3) 48.6 (0.5) 8.97‡ ↑ Hate 48.7 (0.8) 50.0 (0.3) 9.84‡ ↓ 50.2 (0.3) 49.0 (0.4) 9.84‡ ↑ 49.9 (0.3) 49.5 (0.5) 9.59‡ ↑ Table 2. Study 2 MANCOVA of differences between users and non-users of psychedelic users on measures of psychological strengths, well-being, and distress. Sample sizes: Psychedelics (users, n = 239; non-users, n = 1288), Cannabis (users, n = 959; non-users, n = 568), and Alcohol (users, n = 495; non- users, n = 1032). Means and standard errors (in parentheses) are provided. Analysis is controlling for age, sex, education, ethnicity, religious affiliation, local residency, income, student status, work status, local residency, and lifetime non-medical use of other categories psychoactive drugs. Significance: *p <= .05, †p <= .01, ‡p <= .001. D = Directionality. Bold indicates medium-large effect size; all others are small effect sizes with sleep quality being nonsignificant. Items below the line are negative psychological qualities. 6.2.5 Alcohol A third MANCOVA was performed to examine the differences between those who use alcohol on a regular basis (i.e. 1 or more alcoholic beverages in an average week; n = 1032) versus those who do not consume any on a regular basis (n = 495). The result was significant for alcohol [F(14,1496) = 3.66, p <= .001; Wilk's Λ = .97, ηp² = .03]. The MANCOVA controlled for the covariates of age, sex, education, ethnicity, affiliation with a religion, student status, and the non-medical use of other classes of drugs (major stimulants, sedatives, opioids, psychedelics, MDMA, and cannabis). Significant differences were observed on all well-being measures except for sleep quality, with effect sizes ranging from small to medium. Differences on four measures were in http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 10 the adaptive direction for regular alcohol consumers (forgiveness, perceived social support, inclusive identity, and perceived health), and in the maladaptive direction on nine measures. See Table 2 for results. 6.3 Discussion Demographic patterns are well-established in aspects of wellbeing and psychoactive substance use11,161. In our data, those who had used psychedelics at least once were more likely to have used other categories of psychoactive substances. These data bolster justification for controlling for these factors in group analyses to ensure that any differences found were not related to extraneous variables and instead isolate the associations. When those influences were controlled for, psychedelic users showed more adaptive psychological patterns (i.e. greater levels of strengths and lower levels of maladaptive traits) compared to non-users, with the exception of perceived social support. In contrast, the patterns with cannabis and alcohol users versus nonusers were far more varied. Cannabis users showed more maladaptive patterns in half of the measures, while regular alcohol users showed maladaptive patterns in roughly two-thirds of the measures. It is important to caveat this discussion with the understanding that observed differences showed primarily small-moderate effect sizes, potentially limiting the interpretability of results. With that in mind, all but one of the differences between users and non-users appeared in the predicted direction. Alcohol and cannabis use have been associated with mixed health outcomes. While alcohol has no approved medical uses, cannabis constituents and products have known therapeutic uses4. The quantity, context, and motivation for use likely play important roles in the costs versus benefits of the outcomes. For example, while light to moderate consumption of alcohol is associated with lower levels of depression in the presence of stress, this is not the case in young adults or the elderly50,100. There is also a positive association between alcohol use disorders and clinical depression, where the presence of one disorder doubles the risk of the other14. Similarly, heavy cannabis use is associated with depression97 and because of the pharmacological variability inherent to cultivated cannabis, coupled with the confusion surrounding this variability even in interested and conscientious cannabis consumers126, it may be difficult to make any serious assertions regarding psychological strengths and liabilities related to cannabis consumption. It is important to note that this study specifically inquired about the non-medical use of cannabis. We saw cannabis and psychedelics as a useful comparison; while cannabis is used more commonly than psychedelics, the perception of risk associated with the two categories of drugs are comparable in the general population5,113. This contrasts with categories like major stimulants and opioids where recreational use is perceived to have greater risk. 7. Study 3 The goal of Study 3 was to replicate the range of traits for which we previously saw associations, applying applicable covariates, and running cannabis and alcohol comparisons. We sought to conduct a mediation analysis to see if increases in positive psychological traits were mediated by the degree of self-transcendence (single item self-transcendence measure)138, as well as an analysis of ‘motivation’ for psychedelic use. By chance, Study 3 took place during the beginning of the COVID‑19 pandemic. Data collection took place during the entire month of April and first week of May 2020. This was approximately two weeks after quarantines began in many regions68. Data collection was centered in New Jersey, which along with New York, was becoming the epicenter of the pandemic. For this reason, items relevant to the pandemic were tailored toward psychological http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 11 adjustment to the developing situation. This allowed for a unique opportunity to examine the effects of psychedelics during an ongoing global crisis. We predicted the pandemic would not affect the relatively adaptive psychological profile seen in the psychedelic users group. In this study, we sought to further control for peoples’ beliefs about the potentially beneficial effects of psychedelics. It is well known that beliefs about a drug cause expectancy effects, both placebo and nocebo16. Historically, there have been a wide range of attitudes and beliefs about classical psychedelics, ranging from sacred to hazardous to psychotherapeutic93. Thus, controlling for potential effects of beliefs might be useful to discern the effects of the psychedelic experiences themselves rather than beliefs about them. The effects of set and setting in the context of psychedelic experiences are well established31,144. A subcategory of psychological set is the motivation and beliefs of the users. A range of motives have been associated with the use of psychedelics including euphoric effects, broadening consciousness, activity enhancement80, personal growth81, and psychological self-exploration77. There is evidence that intention (e.g. the desired result of taking a psychedelic) or motivation for use is a predictor of positive outcome in recreational psychedelic drug users66,182. Motivation and beliefs of that user might be expected to inform where they take psychedelics, for example, in a structured context where a religious or spiritual substructure is implicit in the psychedelic experience144. In Study 3, we asked participants to indicate their most common “intention” for taking psychedelics, either “fun/recreational” or “growth motive” in order to ascertain possible effects. We hypothesized psychedelic users would again show a predominantly adaptive pattern among psychological strengths and distresses and that these results would be independent of beliefs about psychedelics. We hypothesized that alcohol and cannabis users would show mixed patterns of results compared to psychedelic users. We further hypothesized that one’s motivation for psychedelic use would be relevant among psychedelic users, where those with growth-related motivations (i.e. psychological, spiritual) would show a more adaptive pattern than those with predominantly recreational motivations, and that frequency of psychedelic use would predict increased levels of at least some of these traits. 7.1 Methods 7.1.1 Survey completion, demographics, and measures Same as Study 1 and 2, see Supplement 1 for survey completion and demographics and Supplement 2 for measures. Of the 1,142 counted respondents, 1,008 provided data on whether they practiced sitting or moving meditation. Since that was considered a critical covariate in this study, the sample was effectively reduced to those respondents in the multivariate analyses of covariance (N = 1008). 7.1.2 Procedure The procedures for participant recruitment, data collection, response validity, and data transformation were the same as in Studies 1 and 2. See Supplemental Material 1 for transformations157. Use of psychoactive drugs was assessed per Study 2. In addition to self-reported drug use, an open-ended item was added asking for those who have used classic psychedelics to specify which ones: 125 reported psilocybin mushrooms, 133 reported LSD, 13 reported DMT, 3 reported ayahuasca, and 21 reported mescaline-containing plants (peyote or San Pedro cacti). Additionally, participants were asked their motive for using psychedelics (“What is/was your http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 12 main reason for using psychedelics, if you ever have?”, with possible responses of: “Growth (psychological, spiritual, and/or consciousness)”, “Fun/recreation”, or “I've never used them”. One item dichotomously assessed the belief about whether psychedelics can be used in a beneficial manner (“I believe that it's possible for psychedelics to be used in a way that promotes psychological well-being”), with “Agree”/“Disagree” as possible responses. 7.2 Results 7.2.1 For psychoactive drug usage See Supplement 1. Of psychedelic users, 70.6% reported primarily fun/recreation motives, while 29.4% reported primarily growth motives. Broken down by users/nonusers, 85.4% of psychedelic users believed they could be used for beneficial purposes, while 45.2% of nonusers endorsed this belief. 7.2.2 Correlations between use of psychedelics and other drugs See Supplement 3. A non-parametric correlation analysis showed (as in Study 2), that more frequent use of psychedelics was positively associated with more frequent nonmedical use of all measured drug classes, but not alcohol. 7.2.3 Psychedelic use A MANCOVA examining differences between psychedelic users (n = 182) versus nonusers (n = 826) who provided meditation data on the well-being measures was significant [F(22,956) = 2.17, p < .001; Wilk's Λ = .95, ηp² = .05]. See Supplement 4 for significant and non-significant influences of covariates: Significant differences were observed on all well-being measures. The directionality was in the adaptive direction for all measures except for financial fear during the pandemic (SIFF), on which psychedelic users scored slightly higher than nonusers. See Table 3 and Figure 1 for results. 7.2.4 Cannabis use A MANCOVA examining differences between cannabis users (n = 675) versus nonusers (n = 333) on the well-being measures was significant [F(22,956) = 2.17, p < .001; Wilk's Λ = .95, ηp² = .05]. Significant differences were observed on all well-being measures. The directionality was in the maladaptive direction for all measures except for three: Cannabis users scored higher in gratitude (G3), self-transcendence (SIST), and lower on financial fear during the pandemic (SIFF). Results show moderate to large effect sizes. See Table 3 for results. 7.2.5 Alcohol use A MANCOVA examining differences between regular alcohol users (n = 693) versus nonusers (n = 315) on the well-being measures was significant [F(22,956) = 1.79, p = .014; Wilk's Λ = .96, ηp² = .04]. Significant differences were observed on all well-being measures. Alcohol users showed more adaptive levels in 12 areas: higher scores on altruism (CASA), elevation (ELEV), benefit reminding (BRS), gratitude (G3), forgiveness (TTF), perceived support (SIPSS), meaning in life (SIMIL), life satisfaction (SILS), subjective sleep quality (SISQ), and lower levels of pain perception (SIPS) and pandemic fear (SIPF). Other measures showed a maladaptive pattern in alcohol users. With the exception of peer support, results show moderate to large effect sizes. See Table 3 for results. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 13 Psychedelics Cannabis Alcohol Users Non- users Users Non- users Users Non- users M (SE) M (SE) F D M (SE) M (SE) F ηp² M (SE) M (SE) F D Mindfulness 50.4 (.9) 50.0 (.3) 5.93‡ ↑ 49.8 (.4) 50.4 (.6) 5.96‡ ↓ 49.6 (.4) 50.9 (.6) 6.06‡ ↓ Equanimity 52.0 (.9) 49.6 (.3) 6.36‡ ↑ 49.5 (.4) 51.2 (.6) 6.39‡ ↓ 49.6 (.4) 51.0 (.6) 6.51‡ ↓ Self-Kindness 51.4 (.9) 49.7 (.4) 4.23‡ ↑ 49.2 (.4) 51.6 (.6) 4.18‡ ↓ 49.8 (.4) 50.3 (.6) 4.24‡ ↓ Altruism 52.2 (.9) 49.6 (.4) 3.46‡ ↑ 50.0 (.4) 50.1 (.6) 3.37‡ ↓ 50.1 (.4) 49.9 (.6) 3.46‡ ↑ Awe 53.2 (.9) 49.2 (.3) 3.69‡ ↑ 49.8 (.4) 50.0 (.6) 3.73‡ ↓ 49.7 (.4) 50.4 (.6) 3.68‡ ↓ Elevation 51.6 (.9) 49.6 (.4) 3.46‡ ↑ 49.9 (.4) 50.0 (.6) 3.27‡ ↓ 50.0 (.4) 49.8 (.6) 3.49‡ ↑ Benefit Rem. 52.0 (.9) 49.6 (.4) 2.62‡ ↑ 49.9 (.4) 50.5 (.6) 2.66‡ ↓ 50.3 (.4) 49.5 (.6) 2.65‡ ↑ Gratitude 50.2 (.9) 49.6 (.4) 2.78‡ ↑ 49.7 (.4) 49.6 (.6) 2.72‡ ↑ 49.9 (.4) 49.3 (.6) 2.72‡ ↑ Forgiveness 51.4 (.9) 49.7 (.3) 3.06‡ ↑ 49.4 (.4) 51.2 (.6) 3.00‡ ↓ 50.3 (.4) 49.2 (.6) 3.16‡ ↑ Self-Trans. 53.4 (.9) 49.6 (.3) 4.80‡ ↑ 50.4 (.4) 50.2 (.6) 5.00‡ ↓ 50.2 (.4) 50.5 (.6) 5.03‡ ↓ Perc. Support 51.2 (.9) 49.8 (.4) 1.75† ↑ 49.5 (.4) 51.2 (.6) 2.03‡ ↓ 50.7 (.4) 48.7 (.6) 1.85† ↑ Meaning/life 52.4 (.9) 49.5 (.4) 2.98‡ ↑ 49.3 (.4) 51.3 (.6) 3.01‡ ↓ 50.2 (.4) 49.5 (.6) 3.02‡ ↑ Life Satisfaction 51.0 (.9) 49.9 (.4) 3.78‡ ↑ 49.6 (.4) 51.3 (.6) 3.81‡ ↓ 50.5 (.4) 49.3 (.6) 3.90‡ ↑ Perc. Health 51.1 (.9) 49.8 (.4) 2.48‡ ↑ 49.4 (.4) 51.3 (.6) 3.28‡ ↓ 50.3 (.4) 49.4 (.6) 2.53‡ ↑ Sleep 51.6 (.9) 49.2 (.4) 3.24‡ ↑ 49.3 (.4) 50.4 (.6) 3.43‡ ↓ 49.7 (.4) 49.6 (.6) 3.21‡ ↑ Anxiety 49.0 (.8) 50.3 (.3) 6.50‡ ↓ 50.2 (.4) 49.9 (.6) 6.56‡ ↑ 50.3 (.4) 49.5 (.5) 6.48‡ ↑ Depression 48.5 (.8) 50.0 (.3) 6.12‡ ↓ 50.3 (.4) 48.6 (.6) 5.97‡ ↑ 50.0 (.4) 49.2 (.5) 6.19 v ↑ Helplessness 48.3 (.9) 50.2 (.3) 4.64‡ ↓ 50.4 (.4) 48.8 (.6) 4.38‡ ↑ 49.9 (.4) 49.6 (.6) 4.64‡ ↑ Boredom 47.0 (.8) 49.8 (.3) 9.43‡ ↓ 49.9 (.4) 48.1 (.5) 9.30‡ ↑ 49.6 (.3) 48.7 (.5) 9.32‡ ↑ Pain Perception 49.6 (.9) 50.1 (.4) 2.28‡ ↓ 50.7 (.4) 48.5 (.6) 3.33‡ ↑ 49.4 (.4) 51.4 (.6) 2.50‡ ↓ Pandemic Fear 49.6 (.9) 49.8 (.4) 4.33‡ ↓ 50.4 (.4) 48.5 (.6) 4.14‡ ↑ 49.8 (.4) 49.9 (.6) 4.29‡ ↓ Financial Fear 50.1 (.9) 50.1 (.3) 3.29‡ ↑ 49.8 (.4) 50.6 (.6) 3.80‡ ↓ 50.2 (.4) 49.8 (.6) 3.21‡ ↑ Table 3. Study 3 MANCOVA of differences between users and non-users of psychedelic users on measures of psychological strengths, well-being, and distress. Sample sizes: Psychedelics (users, n = 182; non-users, n = 826), Cannabis (users, n = 675; non-users, n = 333), and Alcohol (users, n = 693; non- users, n = 315). Means and standard errors (in parentheses) are provided. Analysis is controlling for age, sex, education, ethnicity, religious affiliation, local residency, income, student status, work status, cohabitation status, lifetime meditation hours, local and US residency, and recent and lifetime non- medical use of other categories psychoactive drugs, the belief that psychedelics can be beneficial. D = Directionality. Significance: *p <= .05, †p <= .01, ‡p <= .001. Bold indicates a large effect size, all other effect sizes are medium, with only perceived support being small. 7.2.6 Motivation for psychedelic use (growth vs fun/recreation motive) A MANCOVA comparing psychedelic users only based on their primary motive for using them (growth [n = 53] vs fun/recreation [n = 127]) on the well-being measures was significant [F(22,132) = 1.65, p = .044; Wilk's Λ = .78, ηp² = .22]. 16 of the 22 measured trait differences reached significance, all differences were in the adaptive direction for growth-oriented users, and all 16 significant results had large effect sizes. See Table 4 for details. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 14 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Used Psychedelics Never Used Psychedelics Figure 1. Differences between psychedelic users and non-users on measures of psychological strengths and distress. N = 1142. All differences are statistically significant (p > .001), except Benefit Reminding and Perceived support, where p > .01. Error bars show standard error. 7.2.6 Fun/recreational psychedelic users vs. non-users A MANCOVA was performed to compare psychedelic users with fun/recreational motivations (n = 132) vs. nonusers (n = 799), which was significant [F(22,900) = 1.57, p = .046; Wilk's Λ = .96, ηp² = .04]. See Table 5. Significant differences were found on all well-being measures: differences were in the adaptive direction for fun/recreational users on 12 measures [equanimity (PM.acc), self-kindness (USKS), altruism (CASA), awe (AWE3), benefit reminding (BRS), forgiveness (TTF), self- transcendence (SIST), perceived support (SIPSS), meaning in life (SIMIL), life satisfaction (SILS), sleep quality (SISQ), helplessness (SISH)], and in the maladaptive direction on the other 10 measures [mindfulness (MAAS6), elevation (ELEV), gratitude (G3), perceived health (SIPH), anxiety (PHQ.anx), depression (PHQ.dep), state boredom (SISB), pain perception (SISP), pandemic fear (SIPF), financial fear (SIFF)]. Effect sizes were moderate with the exception of mindfulness, equanimity, anxiety, depression, and boredom, which were large. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 15 Growth Recreational Motive Motive F ηp² Directionality Mindfulness 54.3 (1.4) 49.4 (.9) 2.40‡ .29 A Equanimity 55.4 (1.3) 50.8 (.8) 3.08‡ .34 A Self-Kindness 51.8 (1.6) 48.7 (.9) 1.63* .22 A Altruism 53.4 (1.4) 51.3 (.9) 1.47 - (A) Awe 56.9 (1.4) 51.2 (.8) 2.30‡ .28 A Elevation 52.6 (1.5) 49.4 (.9) 1.78* .23 A Benefit Reminding 55.7 (1.5) 49.8 (.9) 1.43 - (A) Gratitude 52.4 (1.5) 47.7 (.9) 1.96† .25 A Forgiveness 52.2 (1.5) 49.9 (.9) 1.45 - (A) Self-Transcendence 59.7 (1.4) 52.8 (.9) 1.86* .24 A Perceived Support 50.2 (1.5) 48.9 (.9) 1.15 - (A) Meaning in Life 52.1 (1.6) 49.3 (1.0) 1.57* .21 A Life Satisfaction 50.7 (1.4) 48.6 (.9) 2.64‡ .31 A Perceived Health 53.2 (1.3) 49.6 (.8) 2.73‡ .32 A Sleep 53.3 (1.4) 50.2 (.9) 1.78* .23 A Anxiety 47.0 (1.3) 51.1 (.8) 3.06‡ .34 A Depression 47.3 (1.4) 50.9 (.9) 2.39‡ .29 A Helplessness 48.1 (1.5) 50.8 (.9) 1.85* .24 A Boredom 43.8 (1.4) 48.5 (.8) 2.26‡ .28 A Pain Perception 48.5 (1.5) 52.6 (.9) 1.22 - (A) Pandemic Fear 47.6 (1.6) 51.1 (1.0) 1.55 - (A) Financial Fear 48.2 (1.4) 50.4 (.8) 1.61* .22 A *A = Adaptive, M = Maladaptive Table 4. MANCOVA of differences in psychological strengths, well-being and distress between psychedelic users with growth (n = 127) vs. recreational motives (n = 153) from Study 3. Means and standard errors (in parentheses) are provided. Analysis is controlling for age, sex, education, ethnicity, religious affiliation, local residency, income, student status, work status, cohabitation status, lifetime moving meditation hours, and the recent and lifetime use non-medical use of other psychoactive drugs (i.e. opioids, major stimulants, MDMA, dissociatives, sedatives, and alcohol). Results are consistently in the adaptive direction, A, for growth motive psychedelic users, with nonsignificant differences indicated with parentheses. Significance: *p <= .05, †p <= .01, ‡p <= .001. No text is bold because all effect sizes are large. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 16 Fun/Rec. Psychedelic Users Non-users F ηp² Directionality Mindfulness 48.4 (.9) 50.0 (.3) 5.65‡ .14 M Equanimity 49.8 (.9) 49.7 (.3) 6.01‡ .15 A Self-Kindness 50.8 (.9) 49.7 (.4) 4.33‡ .11 A Altruism 51.3 (1.0) 49.5 (.4) 3.19‡ .09 A Awe 52.0 (.9) 49.1 (.4) 2.88‡ .08 A Elevation 49.6 (1.0) 49.9 (.4) 3.17‡ .09 M Benefit Reminding 51.0 (1.0) 49.5 (.4) 2.02† .06 A Gratitude 49.6 (1.0) 49.6 (.4) 2.46‡ .07 M Forgiveness 50.7 (.9) 49.7 (.3) 2.74‡ .07 A Self-Transcendence 51.9 (.9) 49.3 (.4) 3.03‡ .08 A Perceived Support 51.5 (1.0) 49.9 (.4) 1.93† .05 A Meaning in Life 51.8 (1.0) 49.6 (.4) 2.76‡ .08 A Life Satisfaction 50.4 (1.0) 50.0 (.4) 3.81‡ .10 A Perceived Health 49.0 (.9) 49.8 (.3) 2.25‡ .06 M Sleep 50.2 (1.0) 50.0 (.4) 2.69‡ .07 A Anxiety 50.5 (1.0) 49.7 (.4) 6.28‡ .16 M Depression 51.1 (1.0) 49.2 (.4) 6.12‡ .15 M Helplessness 50.1 (.9) 50.4 (.3) 4.68‡ .12 A Boredom 50.1 (.9) 49.9 (.3) 8.87‡ .21 M Pain Perception 50.1 (.9) 49.9 (.3) 2.63‡ .07 M Pandemic Fear 50.7 (.9) 49.8 (.4) 4.66‡ .12 M Financial Fear 50.6 (.9) 50.2 (.3) 3.38‡ .09 M * A = Adaptive, M = Maladaptive Table 5. MANCOVA of differences in psychological strengths, well-being and distress between psychedelic recreational users (n = 149) vs. psychedelic non-users (n = 800) in Study 3. Means and standard errors (in parentheses) are provided. Analysis is controlling for age, sex, education, ethnicity, religious affiliation, local residency, income, student status, work status, cohabitation status, lifetime meditation hours, and the recent and lifetime use non-medical use of other psychoactive drugs (i.e. opioids, major stimulants, MDMA, dissociatives, sedatives, and alcohol). Results are consistently in the adaptive direction for growth motive psychedelic users, with nonsignificant differences indicated with parentheses. Significance: *p <= .05, †p <= .01, ‡p <= .001. Bold indicates large effect size. Traits below the line are psychological distresses. 7.2.7 Mediation analysis A mediation analysis was performed to determine whether self-transcendence mediated any relationship between psychedelic use and overall subjective well-being. In order to do this, a Principal Components Analysis using Varimax rotation was performed to the 9 psychological strengths (MAAS6, EQPM.acc, USKS, CASA, AWE3, ELEV, BRS, G3, TTF), excluding self- transcendence. Two non-overlapping factors were extracted that had eigenvalues of 3.2 and 1.9, which accounted for 32.4% and 24.2% of the variance respectively (56.6% cumulative). Factor I (CASA, ELEV, BRS, G3, AWE3) and Factor II (PM.acc, EQ, MAAS6, TTF, USKS), in turn, formed a single second-order factor that had an eigenvalue of 1.24 and explained 70.0% of the variance. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 17 This was termed the Cumulative Strengths Index (CSI) and was formed by averaging the T-scores of the 9 scales (α = .76). A mediation analysis was performed using PROCESS macro for SPSS, with Model 4, was used for the mediation analysis (Hayes, 2018). This was to determine whether the relationship between lifetime use of psychedelics (independent variable, X) and cumulative strengths (CSI; dependent variable, Y) was mediated by self-transcendence (SIST; M). The model was statistically significant, F(1, 1139)= 56.91, p < 0.001, R2=0.05. Psychedelic use frequency positively predicted self-transcendence (SIST; β = 2.20, p < .001). Psychedelic use did not directly predict cumulative strengths (CSI; β = -.04, p = .799), but SIST did (β = .27, p < .001), [F(2, 1138) = 153.67, p < 0.001, R2=0.21] . The interaction of psychedelic use by self-transcendence (i.e X by M) was significant, F(1, 1137) = 4.63, p = 0.032, and the indirect effect of X on Y via M (Psychedelic use on CSI via SIST) was significant (IE = .60, 95%CI = .43, .79) [Figure 2]. Thus, the relationship between psychedelic use and Cumulative Strengths CSI was fully mediated by self-transcendence78. Figure 2. Mediation analysis (Study 3). The relationship between psychedelic use and a combined index of psychological strengths was fully mediated by self-transcendence. Significance: *p <= .05, †p <= .01, ‡p <= .001. Beta SE 95% CI p LL UL Self-Transcendence (SIST) Psychedelic Use 2.20 .29 1.62 2.77 <.001 Cumulative Strength Index (CSI) Psychedelic Use -.04 .16 -.36 .27 .799 SIST .27 .02 .24 .31 <.001 Table 6. Results of the PROCESS Linear Regression for the Mediation Analysis 7.2.8 Correlation A correlational analysis was used to test whether more frequent use of psychedelics among psychedelic users related to a greater degree of psychological strengths, well-being, more meditation experience, and lower levels of distress. A Spearman rank-order correlation was performed since the frequency of use item employed an ordinal scale. In order to control for multiple comparisons, but not be overly stringent and increase the false negative rate, a Benjamini Hochberg procedure was used12. See Supplement 3. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 18 7.3 Discussion Consistent with Study 2, psychedelic use correlated positively with all other classes of psychoactive drugs except alcohol. This underscores the need to control for the use of other psychoactive drugs in these analyses. The multivariate analyses comparing users vs. nonusers of psychedelics, cannabis, and alcohol mirror the results of Study 2. Psychedelic use was associated with greater psychological well-being, apart from slightly higher financial fear during the pandemic, controlling for relevant covariates including demographic variables, lifetime and recent use of other psychoactive drugs, and the belief that psychedelics could have beneficial effects. These findings are generally consistent with those of psychedelic users in Studies 1 and 2, with the exception that perceived social support was higher in psychedelic users in Study 3 but not Study 2. Also consistent with Study 2 is the findings that cannabis and alcohol users, in contrast, again showed a mixed pattern of results (See Figure 3 for comparison). It is potentially noteworthy that the positive psychological profile shown Study 3 appeared during the acute stressor of the early COVID-19 pandemic. Consistent with our predictions, psychedelic users who cited a growth motive for using psychedelics showed greater strengths and well-being, and lower distress, on most measures (16 out of 22) compared with those whose reported motive was fun/recreation. Effect sizes are large for all 16 observed differences. It must be noted that these differences were at a trend level when seated meditation was included in the covariates, but significant when it was removed. We believe a pertinent explanation might be that seated meditation requires a great deal of motivation for growth because of the time and discipline required, so controlling for the influence of meditation would diminish the effects of growth motivation based on the overlap124,130. Frequency of psychedelic use showed positive correlations with mindfulness, equanimity, forgiveness, self-transcendence, and sitting meditation experience, and inverse correlations with state boredom and pandemic fear. Mindfulness/equanimity, meditation, self-transcendence, and boredom (conversely) are associated with activity of the DMN21,38,54,159 a network known to be modulated by psychedelic experiences21,28,83. Consistent with Study 1, psychedelic users reported more lifetime hours of sitting meditation experience than non-users. This was true for both seated and moving meditation practices and after controlling for demographic influences. Further, among psychedelic users, more frequent psychedelic use correlated with greater seated meditation experience. Relatively little attention seems to have been given to the prevalence of contemplative practices among non-clinical psychedelic users in the literature. The finding of greater meditation hours among psychedelic users in this study might be a meaningful association given that randomized clinical trials showing use of psychedelics during formal sitting meditation retreats increases trait mindfulness147 and the notable overlaps between these domains of self-exploratory practices111. It is uncertain why psychedelic users reported greater financial concern, especially since age, income, education, and work status were controlled for. Further, psychedelic users showed lower anxiety and less fear of the COVID-19 pandemic. One explanation could be that psychedelic users or their family members are more likely to be in occupations that were affected by the pandemic. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 19 Figure 3. Comparison of psychedelics, cannabis, and alcohol across studies Up (↑) and down (↓) arrows indicate whether users in each category of drug scored higher or lower than nonusers, respectively, while a dash (–) menans no significant difference found. Absence of a symbol and color indicates that measure was not used in that study. Green/red coloring indicates whether the difference is adaptive (green) or maladaptive (red) for users. Double arrows (↑↑, ↓↓) indicate consistent findings across the two datasets, while dashed (⇡, ⇣) arrows with a yellow background indicate conflicting results. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 20 8. General discussion 8.1 Summary of findings In three studies, with 3157 participants (Study 1, n = 465; Study 2, n = 1550; Study 3, n = 1142), psychedelic use was associated with greater psychological strengths and lower maladaptive psychological traits, after controlling for demographic variables and other drug use. Findings present significant differences observed on a range of traits (shown in Figure 3). Traits associated with psychedelic use appeared almost wholly in the adaptive direction; This is in contrast to the patterns seen for cannabis or alcohol use, both of which present mixed associations with the battery of psychological traits. The current studies advance and replicate results that show naturalistic psychedelic use can be associated with overall well-being56,133,141,157,166. A mediation analysis revealed that relationships between psychedelic use and psychological strengths were fully mediated by self-transcendence. This mediation supports a solid body of evidence linking the ‘self-transcendent’, ‘ego dissolution’, or ‘mystical-type’ experience to positive clinical15,39,51,91,110,117,132,133 and naturalistic31,49,52,76,80,162,163 outcomes of psychedelic use. The intention for psychedelic use appears to enhance benefits observed in association with the use of psychedelics in a naturalistic setting. Participants who reported ‘growth’ as a primary motivation showed a more adaptive profile than those who reported ‘fun/recreation’. Some traits showed a reversal of the adaptive pattern seen with overall psychedelic users (see Table 5). 8.2 Novel and replicated trait findings Novel psychological strengths associated with psychedelic use previously unreported in the psychedelic literature include higher awe, equanimity, kindness/altruism, benefit reminding, sleep quality, forgiveness, elevation, gratitude, and lower helplessness, and boredom (See Figure 3 for summary of results). In most cases, precedents in the literature explicitly predict psychedelics would impact these psychological traits, but they have never been quantitatively demonstrated. Awe has been hypothesized as a putative mechanism of underlying successes in psychedelic psychotherapy71. While trait equanimity appears unreported in the psychedelic literature, several authors have suggested increases based on subjective reports120,155. A recent paper reported post-psychedelic decreases in ‘experiential avoidance’178, which is essentially the inverse of equanimity as measured in this study65. In the vein of greater empathy44,95 and prosocial behavior72,168 seen in previous studies, we found that psychedelic users are higher in trait kindness as well as self-reported volunteer hours, which we referred to as “altruism”. Interestingly, extraordinary altruists show an increased overlap of self and other processing, a neural correlate and phenomenological component shared by self-transcendent psychedelic experiences34,96. Elevation is unreported although perhaps greater empathy106,127 underlies this finding since it is essential to care about the well-being of others to experience elevation at the sight of others’ virtuous acts. The same may be true of forgiveness, another hitherto unreported adaptive aspect also explicitly suspected by previous authors62. Gratitude has been reported as a common subjective aspect of a cathartic psychedelic experience131,156,157 but to the authors’ knowledge, never quantified. Benefit Reminding may emerge in a similar vein, since both involve enhancing appreciation of events, although this has not been reported or suggested to our knowledge in the psychedelic literature. We observed greater reported humility among psychedelic users. A previous survey-based study failed to find a significant difference between psychedelic users and non-users on trait humility albeit with a much smaller sample size95. Greater subjective sleep quality is unreported. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 21 We observed several lower maladaptive psychological traits and distress previously unreported in the literature. Psychedelic users reported lower state levels of helplessness and boredom. Perceived helplessness appears to be a core aspect of depression105. Boredom susceptibility has been linked to increased odds of psychedelic drug use18, as well as other substance use and anxiety and depression (LePera, 2011). We report lower scores on scales measuring greed, envy, and hate among psychedelic users. Psychedelic use has been linked to decreased greed in one other study where psychedelic users score lower on the value of financial prosperity95. The following findings replicate those of previous research, showing psychedelics associated with: greater self-transcendence17,19, greater mindfulness61,104,135,147,152, greater self-compassion135,153, greater positive affect84,141, greater perceived health8 , greater life satisfaction24 , greater meaning in life59,76, less anxiety63, and depression55,57, and decreased levels of perceived physical pain7,171. All our findings align with previous research, whose reported findings were all replicated in the same direction. Only four findings are contrary to our hypotheses for psychedelic users vs nonusers. Psychedelic users showed more financial fear related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Study 3; perceived social support was in the maladaptive direction in Study 2 but changed to adaptive in Study 3; mindfulness was non-significant in Study 1 but significant in Studies 2 and 3; sleep quality was non-significant in Study 2 but adaptive in Study 3. While the variation in effect sizes and nature of a survey methodology might make detailed interpretation difficult, the directionality of the totality of results is potentially more revealing than any individual result (see Figure 3). 8.3 Psychedelics and psychological strengths during the COVID-19 pandemic Study 3 was conducted during an early phase in the United States of the worldwide COVID-19 viral pandemic. Due to the potential for idiosyncratic results and as a particularly salient cultural zeitgeist, we included two ad hoc items, regarding “pandemic fear” and “financial fear”, as well as ascertaining whether the participant or a close family member had been infected. Infection of the participant or a family member was then used as a covariate in the analysis. Psychedelic users reported less pandemic fear, but contrary to our hypothesis, reported increased financial fear after controlling for annual income. The time frame of data collection (within April 2020) was in the first few weeks of the pandemic, so employment disruptions had not really begun. It’s unclear to the authors why this is the case but might be related to the lower value psychedelic users place on financial prosperity95. The economic stress of the pandemic may introduce cognitive dissonance by making the value of financial prosperity more salient. Alternatively, it may be because psychedelic users tend to work in industries that were more susceptible to disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic (such as the creative sector). We note the retention of significance of psychological traits in the adaptive direction, even during a pandemic. 8.4 Psychedelic users show substantially different psychological profile from cannabis and alcohol users Both cannabis and alcohol show ambiguous and multivalent effects on measured psychological traits, after controlling for demographics and other drug use (see Figure 3). The association of psychedelic use with adaptive traits contrasts with both a commonly used legal and a commonly used illegal drug (federally), both of which are associated with trait profiles difficult to parse. Carhart-Harris and Nutt30 reported a similar finding in a survey of recreational drug users, where 67% of LSD users and 60% of psilocybin users claimed that use of these drugs had produced long-term positive effects on their sense of well-being. They indicated, by contrast, only http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 22 6% of alcohol users claimed similar improvements in well-being attributed to alcohol use30 . Our studies suggest these reported long-term positive effects may not merely be a claimed perception. 8.5 Psychological strengths mediated by self-transcendence Reported relationships between psychedelic use and strengths were fully mediated by self- transcendence (see Figure 2). This mediation analysis supports a large number of precedents indicating that self-transcendent experiences mediate the positive effects of psychedelic experiences15,26,39,51,57,91,110,117,132,133,187. This is consistent with the significant positive correlation observed by Nour et al. (2016)118 between a measure of self-transcendence and long-term well- being and life satisfaction. This finding suggests the centrality of the self-transcendent experience might extend beyond a clinical setting. 8.6 Intention for psychedelic use predicts adaptive psychological set In Study 3 we report the effects of intention/motivation for psychedelic use between ‘fun/recreation’ and ‘growth’ (psychological, spiritual, and/or consciousness) users. Intention to use psychedelics for ‘growth’ was associated with a psychologically adaptive pattern as compared to ‘fun/recreation”. 16 of 22 associations are in the adaptive direction with large effect sizes and the remaining six are treading in the adaptive direction but failed to reach significance. Compared to non-users, ‘Fun/recreation’ users showed increased depression and anxiety, decreased sleep quality, elevation, mindfulness, perceived health, and increased fear of the COVID-19 pandemic. Four of the five differences with large effect sizes were in the maladaptive direction. Motivation for use appears to be a significant determinant of associations, with growth motivation associated across the board with adaptive associations when compared to fun/recreational motivation. While fun/recreational users show 12 adaptive vs 10 maladaptive traits compared to non-users, four of five associations showing large effect sizes were in the maladaptive direction, making the data difficult to interpret. Previous authors reported ‘clear intentions’ and the intention for ‘spiritual connection’ both predict psychedelic-induced mystical experiences66 , as does ‘religious intent’114. Although other authors have reported variable mental health outcomes in naturalistic settings182, to the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to report the effect of intention for personal growth compared to fun/recreation on psychedelic use in naturalistic settings. 8.7 Psychedelic users report more meditation experience Psychedelic users reported more lifetime hours of sitting meditation experience in Study 1 and Study 3 (Study 2 did not inquire about meditation experience). Within psychedelic users, greater frequency of use correlated with greater hours of lifetime seated meditation practice. Survey studies have previously reported that the majorities of their samples experienced desirable changes in contemplative practices, including meditation practice, attributed by the participants to psychedelic experience(s)59,160. Despite the known overlap in the history120, phenomenology111, and neural correlates121, and synergy73 between meditation and the psychedelic experience, to the authors’ knowledge, no study has shown that psychedelic users report more hours of sitting meditation experience or a relationship between frequency of use and hours of lifetime seated meditation. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 23 8.8 Theoretical conclusions The adaptive psychological differences observed in psychedelic users might variously be viewed as the average intrinsic psychological disposition of individuals prone to take psychedelics and/or the result of the transformative psychological effects of the experiential and pharmacological components of the psychedelic experience. These can be viewed as competing hypotheses about why psychedelic users would exhibit these associations, which are not necessarily mutually exclusive. The former might be referred to as the ‘gravitational hypothesis’: people with greater psychological strengths tend to gravitate toward the consumption of psychedelics in naturalistic settings, in which case greater strengths are not a causal effect of psychedelic use but rather reflect predisposing factors behind psychedelic use. The latter can be referred to as the ‘transformational hypothesis’: people who take psychedelics in naturalistic settings can undergo transformational change that results in a variety of increases in psychological strengths, causally connected to the pharmacological action of psychedelic drugs. While the methodology of the current study prohibits a conclusive determination, within the context of this study the gravitational hypothesis appears less likely for a number of reasons. The principal reason is that psychedelic users are not seeking out psychedelic drugs in isolation. In the current studies, psychedelic users are more likely to have used other classes of psychoactive drugs. A small minority of psychedelic users (0.83% in Study 2, and 1.0% in Study 3) have used psychedelics only, with no other non-medical psychoactive drug use (not including alcohol). Possibly as a result of their legal status, the vast majority of psychedelic users are not exclusively gravitating toward psychedelic use only. This has previously been found by other authors115. The retention of relative benefit even in cases where the intent was purely ‘fun/recreational’ casts further doubt on the gravitational hypothesis, as polydrug use appears common in ‘fun/recreational’ settings where psychedelics are likely to be consumed (e.g. music festivals or raves)10,20,48,94. In favor of the transformational hypothesis, many controlled clinical studies have already shown that psychedelics can cause lasting changes in psychological traits. In follow up studies to clinical trials with psychedelics, authors have reported long-term psychological changes causally linked to psychedelic experiences76 including decreased depression at six months26 and continued elevations in well-being, life satisfaction, positive mood, and social behavior at 14 months56,58. Causally linked long-term psychological changes lend plausibly to similarly lasting changes in naturalistic psychedelic users, in accordance with the transformational hypothesis. The terms ‘recreational’66,102 and ‘naturalistic’77,117 are used synonymously in the psychedelic literature to indicate the usually illicit use of psychedelics outside a clinical or laboratory setting. The ambivalent connotation of the term ‘naturalistic’ might contribute to its increasing prevalence in the literature, as opposed to the more classically pejorative term ‘recreational’. The current studies cast some doubt on the coherence of a single categorization for non-clinical psychedelic users. The distinction between ‘fun/recreational’ intent and ‘growth’ intent reflected in our data suggests future studies should potentially differentiate multiple categories of non- clinical psychedelic users. Our data suggest naturalistic psychedelic use might be associated with particular psychological traits, highlighting the potential implications of increasing access to psychedelics. Particularly in comparison to cannabis and alcohol, the current studies suggest psychedelics can be associated with an adaptive psychological profile. In Study 3, 52% of participants reported a belief that it’s possible for psychedelics to be used in a way that promotes psychological well-being. While this was collected and used for the http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 24 purpose of a covariate in analyses, it is potentially indicative of a warming public perception of classical psychedelics as medicines. 8.9 Study strengths and limitations The methodological strengths of this study include the large number of measured psychological strengths and weaknesses, a large sample size and concomitant statistical power, and adjustment for demographic and other substance use covariates. Nonetheless, several methodological limitations exist in this study. We relied on self-selecting/self-report data, which have the inherent potential for a range of implicit biases. Foremost, this study did not collect a truly randomized sample but rather a type of convenience sample, primarily from the East Coast of the United States, and therefore it remains unclear to us how representative our sample is of the population at large. The total sample was around 70% female, which may be an artifact of the starting student population and the individuals they chose to recruit (sex was factored out of all analyses as a covariate). An intrinsic drawback of this recruitment method is that while each study was done in its own time interval, there is a chance a participant of Study 1 could also have participated in a proceeding study, either by being a student in another class or via random snowball recruitment. Self-reported substance use data reported retroactively is subject to bias in recall, as memories may have faded over time. Data might have been collected years or even decades after the last use of a particular class of substances (e.g. older participants who may have experimented with psychedelics in their youth). Subjects may wish to downplay their use of particular substances or exaggerate their use of others. 9. General conclusion This study is the first to compare psychedelic users and non-users on a broad range of psychological traits in a large sample. Taken as a whole, lifetime psychedelic use appears to be associated with greater positive psychological traits and lower maladaptive traits and distress, even during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Associations with these traits appear independent of other illicit drug use (including MDMA and dissociative anesthetics purported to offer similar benefits), meditation experience, and demographic factors. The psychological profile associated with classical psychedelic use is overwhelmingly adaptive, while the same profile of psychological measures associated with cannabis and alcohol use show much more ambiguous mixtures of adaptive and maladaptive. A mediation analysis indicates the observed psychological strengths are fully mediated by trait self-transcendence. Further we show the impact of intention; using psychedelics in a naturalistic setting with ‘growth’ motivation is associated with the most robust set of psychological strengths and lower distress. A future study should explore if set & setting, preparation, integration, or ancillary practices such as meditation, mediate the adaptive profile seen in growth motivated users. We also report psychedelic users meditate more, with increasing psychedelic use being associated with increased lifetime sitting meditation hours. The tendency of psychedelic users to display higher levels of a broad spectrum of positive psychological traits and lower levels of maladaptive traits and distress should be explored in randomized clinical trials to establish causality. Conflict of interest statement The authors declare no conflicts of interest. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 25 Data accessibility Data files are available on request from the corresponding author. Validation data for CASA and Four Sublime Attitudes are available as well. Authors Trey Brasher Stockton University treybrasher@gmail.com David Rosen Stockton University Marcello Spinella Stockton University Publishing Timeline Received 12 May 2022 Revised version received 5 January 2023 Accepted 6 January 2023 Published 28 February 2023 References 1 Aday, JS, Mitzkovitz, CM, Bloesch, EK, Davoli, CC, & Davis, AK (2020). Long-term effects of psychedelic drugs: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.017 2 Affleck, G., & Tennen, H. (1996). Construing benefits from adversity: Adaptational significance and dispositional underpinnings. Journal of personality, 64(4), 899-922. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 6494.1996.tb00948.x 3 Agin-Liebes, G, Haas, TF, Lancelotta, R, Uthaug, MV, Ramaekers, JG, & Davis, AK (2021). Naturalistic Use of Mescaline Is Associated with Self-Reported Psychiatric Improvements and Enduring Positive Life Changes. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.1c00018 4 Alexander, SP (2016). Therapeutic potential of cannabis-related drugs. Progress in Neuro- Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 64, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.07.001 5 Arora, K, Qualls, SH, Bobitt, J, Lum, HD, Milavetz, G, Croker, J, & Kaskie, B (2020). Measuring attitudes toward medical and recreational cannabis among older adults in Colorado. The Gerontologist, 60(4): e232-e241. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz054 6 Atroszko, P, Bagińska, P, Mokosińska, M, & Atroszko, B (2015). Validity and reliability of single-item self-report measures of general quality of life, general health and sleep quality. In Comparative European Research (issue II). Paper presented at the International Scientific Conference for Ph.D. students of EU countries, London, 26-30 October: (pp. 207-211). Sciemcee Publishing, London. 7 Barbosa, PCR, Cazorla, IM, Giglio, JS, & Strassman, R (2009). A six-month prospective evaluation of personality traits, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life in ayahuasca-naïve subjects. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 41(3): 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2009.10400530 8 Barbosa, PCR, Strassman, RJ, da Silveira, DX, Areco, K, Hoy, R, Pommy, J, ... & Bogenschutz, M (2016). Psychological and neuropsychological assessment of regular hoasca users. Comprehensive psychiatry, 71: 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.09.003 9 Barrett, FS, Doss, MK, Sepeda, ND, Pekar, JJ, & Griffiths, RR (2020). Emotions and brain function are altered up to one month after a single high dose of psilocybin. Scientific reports, 10(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59282-y http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.017 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00948.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00948.x https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.1c00018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.07.001 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz054 https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2009.10400530 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.09.003 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59282-y Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 26 10 Barrett, SP, Gross, SR, Garand, I, & Pihl, RO (2005). Patterns of simultaneous polysubstance use in Canadian rave attendees. Substance use & misuse, 40(9-10): 1525-1537. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA- 200066866 11 Barry, M, & Friedli, L (2010). The influence of social, demographic and physical factors on positive mental health in children, adults and older people. In C. L. Cooper, J. Field, U. Goswami, R. Jenkins, & B. J. Sahakian (Eds.), Mental capital and wellbeing (p. 475–484). Wiley-Blackwell. 12 Benjamini, Y, & Hochberg, Y (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological), 57(1): 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x 13 Bilevicius, E, Smith, SD, & Kornelsen, J (2018). Resting-state network functional connectivity patterns associated with the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Brain Connectivity, 8(1): 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2017.0520 14 Boden, JM, & Fergusson, DM (2011). Alcohol and depression. Addiction, 106(5): 906-914. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03351.x 15 Bogenschutz, MP, Forcehimes, AA, Pommy, JA, Wilcox, CE, Barbosa, P, Strassman, RJ (2015). Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: a proof-of-concept study. J Psychopharmacology, 29: 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114565144 16 Bootzin, RR, & Bailey, ET (2005). Understanding placebo, nocebo, and iatrogenic treatment effects. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(7): 871-880. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20131 17 Bouso, JC, González, D, Fondevila, S, Cutchet, M, Fernández, X, Barbosa, PCR, ... & Riba, J (2012). Personality, psychopathology, life attitudes and neuropsychological performance among ritual users of ayahuasca: a longitudinal study. PLoS One, 7(8): e42421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042421 18 Bouso, JC, dos Santos, RG, Alcázar-Córcoles, MÁ, & Hallak, JE (2018). Serotonergic psychedelics and personality: A systematic review of contemporary research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 87: 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.02.004 19 Bouso, JC, Palhano-Fontes, F, Rodríguez-Fornells, A, Ribeiro, S, Sanches, R, Crippa, JA, S, ... & Riba, J (2015). Long-term use of psychedelic drugs is associated with differences in brain structure and personality in humans. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 25(4): 483-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.01.008 20 Boys, A, Lenton, S, and Norcross, K, (1997). Polydrug use at raves by a Western Australian sample. Drug and alcohol review, 16(3): 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595239800187411 21 Brewer, JA, Worhunsky, PD, Gray, JR, Tang, YY, Weber, J, & Kober, H (2011). Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50): 20254-20259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112029108 22 Brown, R. P. (2003). Measuring individual differences in the tendency to forgive: Construct validity and links with depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 759-771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029006008 23 Brown, KW, & Ryan, RM (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4): 822-848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 24 Carbonaro, TM, Bradstreet, MP, Barrett, FS, MacLean, KA, Jesse, R, Johnson, MW, & Griffiths, RR (2016). Survey study of challenging experiences after ingesting psilocybin mushrooms: Acute and enduring positive and negative consequences. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 30(12): 1268-1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116662634 25 Cardaciotto, L, Herbert, JD, Forman, EM, Moitra, E, & Farrow, V (2008). The assessment of present- moment awareness and acceptance the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment, 15(2): 204-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107311467 26 Carhart-Harris, RL, Bolstridge, M, Day, CMJ, Rucker, J, Watts, R, Erritzoe, DE, ... & Rickard, JA (2018). Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six-month follow-up. Psychopharmacology, 235(2): 399-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4771-x http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-200066866 https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-200066866 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2017.0520 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03351.x https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114565144 https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20131 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042421 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.02.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.01.008 https://doi.org/10.1080/09595239800187411 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112029108 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029006008 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116662634 https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107311467 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4771-x Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 27 27 Carhart-Harris, RL, & Friston, KJ (2010). The default-mode, ego-functions and free-energy: a neurobiological account of Freudian ideas. Brain, 133(4): 1265-1283. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq010 28 Carhart-Harris, RL, Erritzoe, D, Williams, T, Stone, JM, Reed, LJ, Colasanti, A, ... & Hobden, P (2012). Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psilocybin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(6): 2138-2143. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119598109 29 Carhart-Harris, RL, Muthukumaraswamy, S, Roseman, L, Kaelen, M, Droog, W, Murphy, K, ... & Leech, R (2016). Neural correlates of the LSD experience revealed by multimodal neuroimaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17): 4853-4858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518377113 30 Carhart-Harris RL, Nutt DJ (2013) Experienced drug users assess the relative harms and benefits of drugs: a web-based survey. J Psychoactive Drugs 45: 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2013.825034 31 Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Haijen, E., Erritzoe, D., Watts, R., Branchi, I., & Kaelen, M. (2018). Psychedelics and the essential importance of context. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 32(7), 725-731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881118754710 32 Cohen, S (1985). LSD: The varieties of psychotic experience. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 17(4), 291- 296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.1985.10524333 33 Cohen, J (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 34 Crockett, MJ, & Lockwood, PL (2018). Extraordinary altruism and transcending the self. Trends in cognitive sciences, 22(12): 1071-1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.09.003 35 Cummins, C., & Lyke, J. (2013). Peak experiences of psilocybin users and non-users. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 45(2), 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2013.785855 36 Curran, PG (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66: 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006 37 Dalgarno, P, & Shewan, D (2005). Reducing the risks of drug use: The case for set and setting. Addiction Research & Theory, 13(3): 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350500053562 38 Danckert, J, & Merrifield, C (2018). Boredom, sustained attention and the default mode network. Experimental brain research, 236(9): 2507-2518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4617-5 39 Deane, G (2020). Dissolving the self. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 1(I): 2-2. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2020.I.39 40 Diener, ED, Emmons, RA, Larsen, RJ, & Griffin, S (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1): 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 41 Diener, E, Lucas, RE, & Oishi, S (2005). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed.), (pp. 63- 73). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 42 Diener, E, Wirtz, D, Tov, W, Kim-Prieto, C, Choi, DW, Oishi, S, & Biswas-Diener, R (2010). New well- being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2): 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y 43 Doblin, R (1991). Pahnke’s “Good Friday experiment”: A long-term follow-up and methodological critique. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 23(1): 1-28. 44 Dolder, PC, Schmid, Y, Müller, F, Borgwardt, S, & Liechti, ME (2016). LSD acutely impairs fear recognition and enhances emotional empathy and sociality. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41(11): 2638-2646. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2016.82 45 Doll, A, Hölzel, BK, Boucard, CC, Wohlschläger, AM, & Sorg, C (2015). Mindfulness is associated with intrinsic functional connectivity between default mode and salience networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9: 461. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00461 46 Emmons, RA, & McCullough, ME (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: an experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2): 377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377 http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq010 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119598109 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518377113 https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2013.825034 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881118754710 https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.1985.10524333 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.09.003 https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2013.785855 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006 https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350500053562 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4617-5 https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2020.I.39 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2016.82 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00461 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377 Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 28 47 Emmons, RA, McCullough, ME, & Tsang, JA (2003). The assessment of gratitude. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (p. 327–341). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10612-021 48 Fernández-Calderón, F, Cleland, CM, and Palamar, JJ (2018). Polysubstance use profiles among electronic dance music party attendees in New York City and their relation to use of new psychoactive substances. Addictive behaviors, 78: 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.004 49 Forstmann, M, Yudkin, DA, Prosser, AM, Heller, SM, & Crockett, MJ (2020). Transformative experience and social connectedness mediate the mood-enhancing effects of psychedelic use in naturalistic settings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(5): 2338-2346. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918477117 50 García-Esquinas, E, Ortolá, R, Galán, I, Soler-Vila, H, Laclaustra, M, & Rodríguez-Artalejo, F (2018). Moderate alcohol drinking is not associated with risk of depression in older adults. Scientific reports, 8(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29985-4 51 Garcia-Romeu A, Griffiths RR, Johnson MW (2014). Psilocybin-occasioned mystical experiences in the treatment of tobacco addiction. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2014, 7: 157-164. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473708666150107121331 52 Garcia-Romeu, A, Davis, AK, Erowid, E, Griffiths, RR, & Johnson, MW (2020). Persisting reductions in cannabis, opioid, and stimulant misuse after naturalistic psychedelic use: An online survey. Frontiers in psychiatry, 10: 955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00955 53 Garcia-Romeu, A, Davis, AK, Erowid, F, Erowid, E, Griffiths, RR, and Johnson, MW (2019). Cessation and reduction in alcohol consumption and misuse after psychedelic use. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 33(9): pp.1088-1101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881119845793 54 Garrison, KA, Zeffiro, TA, Scheinost, D, Constable, RT, & Brewer, JA (2015). Meditation leads to reduced default mode network activity beyond an active task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(3): 712-720. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0358-3 55 Gasser, P, Holstein, D, Michel, Y, Doblin, R, Yazar-Klosinski, B, Passie, T and Brenneisen, R (2014). Safety and efficacy of lysergic acid diethylamide-assisted psychotherapy for anxiety associated with life-threatening diseases. The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 202(7): p.513. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000113 56 Griffiths RR, Richards WA, Johnson MW, McCann UD, & Jesse R (2008). Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. Journal of psychopharmacology. Aug, 22(6): 621-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881108094300 57 Griffiths, RR, Johnson, MW, Carducci, MA, Umbricht, A, Richards, WA, Richards, BD, Cosimano, MP, and Klinedinst, MA (2016). Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. Journal of psychopharmacology, 30(12): pp.1181-1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116675513 58 Griffiths RR, Johnson MW, Richards WA, Richards BD, McCann U, & Jesse R (2011). Psilocybin occasioned mystical-type experiences: immediate and persisting dose-related effects. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 218: 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2358-5 59 Griffiths, RR, Hurwitz, ES, Davis, AK, Johnson, MW, & Jesse, R (2019). Survey of subjective “God encounter experiences”: Comparisons among naturally occurring experiences and those occasioned by the classic psychedelics psilocybin, LSD, ayahuasca, or DMT. PloS one, 14(4), e0214377. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214377 60 Griffiths, RR, Richards, WA, McCann, U, & Jesse, R (2006). Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology, 187(3): 268-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0457-5 61 Griffiths, RR, Johnson, MW, Richards, WA, Richards, BD, Jesse, R, MacLean, KA, Barrett, FS, Cosimano, MP, Klinedinst, MA (2018). Psilocybin-occasioned mystical- type experience in combination with meditation and other spiritual practices produces enduring positive changes in psychological functioning and in trait measures of prosocial attitudes and behaviors. J. Psychopharmacology, 32: 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881117731279 http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ https://doi.org/10.1037/10612-021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.004 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918477117 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29985-4 https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473708666150107121331 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00955 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881119845793 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0358-3 https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000113 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881108094300 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116675513 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2358-5 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214377 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0457-5 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881117731279 Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 29 62 Grinspoon, L, & Doblin, R (2001). Psychedelics as catalysts of insight-oriented psychotherapy. Social Research, 677-695. 63 Grob, CS, Danforth, AL, Chopra, GS, Hagerty, M, McKay, CR, Halberstadt, AL, & Greer, GR (2011). Pilot study of psilocybin treatment for anxiety in patients with advanced-stage cancer. Archives of general psychiatry, 68(1): 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.116 64 Haber, MG, Cohen, JL, Lucas, T, & Baltes, BB (2007). The relationship between self‑reported received and perceived social support: A meta‑analytic review. American journal of community psychology, 39(1-2): 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9100-9 65 Hadash, Y, Segev, N, Tanay, G, Goldstein, P, & Bernstein, A (2016). The decoupling model of equanimity: theory, measurement, and test in a mindfulness intervention. Mindfulness, 7(5): 1214- 1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0564-2 66 Haijen, EC, Kaelen, M, Roseman, L, Timmermann, C, Kettner, H, Russ, S, ... & Carhart-Harris, RL (2018). Predicting responses to psychedelics: a prospective study. Frontiers in pharmacology, 9: 897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00897 67 Hawker, GA, Mian, S, Kendzerska, T, & French, M (2011). Measures of adult pain. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(S11): S240-S252. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543 68 Hawkins, D, Berger, M, Isti, M, and Shammas, B (2020, March 13). Trump declares coronavirus outbreak a national emergency. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com 69 Heintzelman, SJ, & King, LA (2014). Life is pretty meaningful. American Psychologist, 69(6): 561. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035049 70 Hendricks, PS, Thorne, CB, Clark, CB, Coombs, DW, Johnson, MW (2015). Classic psychedelic use is associated with reduced psychological distress and suicidality in the United States adult population. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 29(3): 280-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114565653 71 Hendricks, PS (2018). Awe: a putative mechanism underlying the effects of classic psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. International Review of Psychiatry, 30(4): 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2018.1474185 72 Hendricks, PS, Crawford, MS, Cropsey, KL, Copes, H, Sweat, NW, Walsh, Z, & Pavela, G (2018). The relationships of classic psychedelic use with criminal behavior in the United States adult population. Journal of psychopharmacology, 32(1): 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881117735685 73 Heuschkel, K, & Kuypers, KP (2020). Depression, Mindfulness, and Psilocybin: Possible Complementary Effects of Mindfulness Meditation and Psilocybin in the Treatment of Depression. A Review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00224 74 Johansen, PØ, & Krebs, TS (2015). Psychedelics not linked to mental health problems or suicidal behavior: A population study. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 29(3): 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114568039 75 Johnson, CA, Black, DS, Sussman, S, & Milam, J (2012). Psychometric Assessment of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) Among Chinese Adolescents. Assessment, 19(1): 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111415365 76 Johnson, MW, Garcia-Romeu, A, & Griffiths, RR (2017). Long-term follow-up of psilocybin-facilitated smoking cessation. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 43(1): 55-60. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2016.1170135 77 Johnson, MW, Garcia-Romeu, A, Johnson, PS, & Griffiths, RR (2017). An online survey of tobacco smoking cessation associated with naturalistic psychedelic use. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 31(7): 841-850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116684335 78 Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications. 79 Jungaberle, H, Thal, S, Zeuch, A, Rougemont-Bücking, A, von Heyden, M, Aicher, H, & Scheidegger, M (2018). Positive psychology in the investigation of psychedelics and entactogens: A critical review. Neuropharmacology, 142: 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.06.034 http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.116 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9100-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0564-2 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00897 https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035049 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114565653 https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2018.1474185 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881117735685 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00224 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114568039 https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111415365 https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2016.1170135 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116684335 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.06.034 Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 30 80 Kettner, H, Mason, NL, & Kuypers, KP (2019). Motives for Classical and Novel Psychoactive Substances Use in Psychedelic Polydrug Users. Contemporary Drug Problems, 46(3): 304-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450919863899 81 Kjellgren, A., & Norlander, T. (2000). Psychedelic drugs: A study of drug-induced experiences obtained by illegal drug users in relation to Stanislav Grof's model of altered states of consciousness. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 20(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.2190/A2RX-XV10-NHUE-3612 82 Klavetter, RE, & Mogar, RE (1967). Peak experiences: Investigation of their relationship to psychedelic therapy and self-actualization. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 7(2): 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/002216786700700206 83 Kometer, M, Pokorny, T, Seifritz, E, & Volleinweider, FX (2015). Psilocybin-induced spiritual experiences and insightfulness are associated with synchronization of neuronal oscillations. Psychopharmacology, 232(19): 3663-3676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-4026-7 84 Kometer, M, Schmidt, A, Bachmann, R, Studerus, E, Seifritz, E, & Vollenweider, FX (2012). Psilocybin biases facial recognition, goal-directed behavior, and mood state toward positive relative to negative emotions through different serotonergic subreceptors. Biological psychiatry, 72(11): 898-906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.005 85 Krebs, TS, & Johansen, PØ (2013). Over 30 million psychedelic users in the United States. F1000Research, 2. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-98.v1 86 Krekels, G, & Pandelaere, M (2015). Dispositional greed. Personality and Individual Differences, 74: 225-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.036 87 Kroenke, K, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB, & Löwe, B (2009). An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ–4. Psychosomatics, 50(6): 613-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(09)70864-3 88 Kruse, E, Chancellor, J, & Lyubomirsky, S (2017). State humility: Measurement, conceptual validation, and intrapersonal processes. Self and Identity, 16(4): 399-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1267662 89 Lange, J, Blatz, L, & Crusius, J (2018). Dispositional envy: A conceptual review. The SAGE Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences, 3: 424-440. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451248.n18 90 Lange, J, & Crusius, J (2015). Dispositional envy revisited: Unraveling the motivational dynamics of benign and malicious envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2): 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214564959 91 Lebedev, AV, Kaelen, M, Lövdén, M, Nilsson, J, Feilding, A, Nutt, DJ, & Carhart‑Harris, RL (2016). LSD‑induced entropic brain activity predicts subsequent personality change. Human brain mapping, 37(9): 3203-3213. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23234 92 Lebedev, AV, Lövdén, M, Rosenthal, G, Feilding, A, Nutt, DJ, & Carhart‑Harris, RL (2015). Finding the self by losing the self: Neural correlates of ego‑dissolution under psilocybin. Human brain mapping, 36(8): 3137-3153. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22833 93 Lee, MA, & Shlain, B (1985). Acid dreams: The CIA, LSD, and the sixties rebellion. Grove Press. 94 Lenton, S, Boys, A, & Norcross, K (1997). Raves, drugs and experience: drug use by a sample of people who attend raves in Western Australia. Addiction, 92(10): 1327-1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360- 0443.1997.tb02851.x 95 Lerner, M, & Lyvers, M (2006). Values and beliefs of psychedelic drug users: A cross-cultural study. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 38(2): 143-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2006.10399838 96 Letheby, C, & Gerrans, P (2017). Self unbound: ego dissolution in psychedelic experience. Neuroscience of consciousness, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/nix016 97 Lev-Ran, S, Roerecke, M, Le Foll, B, George, TP, McKenzie, K, & Rehm, J (2014). The association between cannabis use and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological medicine, 44(4): 797-810. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713001438 98 Levenson, MR, Jennings, PA, Aldwin, CM, & Shiraishi, RW (2005). Self-transcendence: Conceptualization and measurement. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 60(2): 127-143. https://doi.org/10.2190/XRXM-FYRA-7U0X-GRC0 99 Lewis, B (2016). Mindfulness, mysticism, and narrative medicine. Journal of Medical Humanities, 37(4): 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-016-9387-3 http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450919863899 https://doi.org/10.2190/A2RX-XV10-NHUE-3612 https://doi.org/10.1177/002216786700700206 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-4026-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.005 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-98.v1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.036 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(09)70864-3 https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2016.1267662 https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451248.n18 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214564959 https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23234 https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22833 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02851.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02851.x https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2006.10399838 https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/nix016 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713001438 https://doi.org/10.2190/XRXM-FYRA-7U0X-GRC0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-016-9387-3 Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 31 100 Lipton, RI (1994). The effect of moderate alcohol use on the relationship between stress and depression. American Journal of Public Health, 84(12): 1913-1917. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.84.12.1913 101 Lyons, T, & Carhart-Harris, RL (2018). Increased nature relatedness and decreased authoritarian political views after psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 32(7): 811-819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881117748902 102 Lyvers, M, & Meester, M (2012). Illicit use of LSD or psilocybin, but not MDMA or nonpsychedelic drugs, is associated with mystical experiences in a dose-dependent manner. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 44(5): 410-417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2012.736842 103 MacLean, KA, Johnson, MW, & Griffiths, RR (2011). Mystical experiences occasioned by the hallucinogen psilocybin lead to increases in the personality domain of openness. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 25(11): 1453-1461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881111420188 104 Madsen, MK, Fisher, PM, Stenbæk, DS, Kristiansen, S, Burmester, D, Lehel, S, ... & Knudsen, GM (2020). A single psilocybin dose is associated with long-term increased mindfulness, preceded by a proportional change in neocortical 5-HT2A receptor binding. European Neuropsychopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.02.001 105 Maier, SF, & Seligman, ME (2016). Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. Psychological review, 123(4): 349. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000033 106 Mason, NL, Mischler, E, Uthaug, MV, & Kuypers, KP (2019). Sub-acute effects of psilocybin on empathy, creative thinking, and subjective well-being. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 51(2): 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2019.1580804 107 McDowell, TL, & Serovich, JM (2007). The effect of perceived and actual social support on the mental health of HIV-positive persons. AIDS Care, 19(10): 1223-1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120701402830 108 Meade, AW, & Craig, SB (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological methods, 17(3): 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085 109 Miller, TQ, Smith, TW, Turner, CW, Guijarro, ML, & Hallet, AJ (1996). Meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychological bulletin, 119(2): 322-348. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.322 110 Millière, R (2017). Looking for the self: phenomenology, neurophysiology and philosophical significance of drug-induced ego dissolution. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 11: 245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00245 111 Millière, R, Carhart-Harris, RL, Roseman, L, Trautwein, FM, & Berkovich-Ohana, A (2018). Psychedelics, meditation, and self-consciousness. Frontiers in psychology, 9(1475): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01475 112 Mitrofan, N, & Ciuluvică, C (2012). Anger and hostility as indicators of emotion regulation and of the life satisfaction at the beginning and the ending period of the adolescence. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33: 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.084 113 Morgan, CJ, Noronha, LA, Muetzelfeldt, M, Feilding, A, & Curran, HV (2013). Harms and benefits associated with psychoactive drugs: findings of an international survey of active drug users. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 27(6): 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881113477744 114 Neitzke-Spruill, L, & Glasser, C (2018). A gratuitous grace: The influence of religious set and intent on the psychedelic experience. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 50(4): 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2018.1494869 115 Nesvåg, R, Bramness, JG, & Ystrom, E (2015). The link between use of psychedelic drugs and mental health problems. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 29(9): 1035-1040. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881115596156 116 Nichols, DE (2016). Psychedelics. Pharmacological reviews, 68(2): 264-355. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.115.011478 117 Nour, MM, Evans, L, & Carhart-Harris, RL (2017). Psychedelics, personality and political perspectives. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 49(3): 182-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2017.1312643 http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.84.12.1913 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881117748902 https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2012.736842 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881111420188 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.02.001 https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000033 https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2019.1580804 https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120701402830 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.322 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00245 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01475 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.084 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881113477744 https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2018.1494869 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881115596156 https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.115.011478 https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2017.1312643 Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 32 118 Nour, MM, Evans, L, Nutt, D, & Carhart-Harris, RL (2016). Ego-dissolution and psychedelics: validation of the ego-dissolution inventory (EDI). Frontiers in human neuroscience, 10: 269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00269 119 Nutt, D, Erritzoe, D, & Carhart-Harris, R (2020). Psychedelic Psychiatry’s Brave New World. Cell, 181(1): 24-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.020 120 Osto, D (2016). Altered states: buddhism and psychedelic spirituality in America. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/osto17730 121 Palhano-Fontes, F, Andrade, KC, Tofoli, LF, Santos, AC, Crippa, JAS, Hallak, JE, ... & de Araujo, DB (2015). The psychedelic state induced by ayahuasca modulates the activity and connectivity of the default mode network. PloS one, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118143 122 Park, CL (2015). Integrating positive psychology into health-related quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 24(7): 1645-1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0889-z 123 Park, N, Peterson, C, & Seligman, ME (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5): 603-619. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748 124 Pepping, CA, Walters, B, Davis, PJ, & O’Donovan, A (2016). Why do people practice mindfulness? An investigation into reasons for practicing mindfulness meditation. Mindfulness, 7(2): 542-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0490-3 125 Peterson, C, Ruch, W, Beermann, U, Park, N, & Seligman, ME (2007). Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(3): 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701228938 126 Piomelli, D, & Russo, EB (2016). The Cannabis sativa versus Cannabis indica debate: an interview with Ethan Russo, MD. Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 1(1): 44-46. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2015.29003.ebr 127 Pokorny, T, Preller, KH, Kometer, M, Dziobek, I, & Vollenweider, FX (2017). Effect of psilocybin on empathy and moral decision-making. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 20(9): 747-757. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyx047 128 Preller, KH, & Vollenweider, FX (2016). Phenomenology, structure, and dynamic of psychedelic states. In Behavioral Neurobiology of Psychedelic Drugs. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 221-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2016_459 129 Raes, F, Pommier, E, Neff, KD, & Van Gucht, D (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 18: 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.702 130 Reynolds, DK (1982). The quiet therapies: Japanese pathways to personal growth. University of Hawaii Press. 131 Richards, WA (2015). Sacred knowledge: Psychedelics and religious experiences. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231174060.001.0001 132 Roseman, L, Nutt, DJ, & Carhart-Harris, RL (2018). Quality of acute psychedelic experience predicts therapeutic efficacy of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. Frontiers in pharmacology, 8: 974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00974 133 Ross, S, Bossis, A, Guss, J, Agin-Liebes, G, Malone, T, Cohen, B, ... & Su, Z (2016). Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life- threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of psychopharmacology, 30(12): 1165-1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116675512 134 Røysamb, E, Tambs, K, Reichborn-Kjennerud, T, Neale, MC, & Harris, JR (2003). Happiness and health: environmental and genetic contributions to the relationship between subjective well-being, perceived health, and somatic illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6): 1136-1146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1136 135 Sampedro, F, de la Fuente Revenga, M, Valle, M, Roberto, N, Domínguez-Clavé, E, Elices, M, ... & Friedlander, P (2017). Assessing the psychedelic “after-glow” in ayahuasca users: post-acute neurometabolic and functional connectivity changes are associated with enhanced mindfulness capacities. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 20(9): 698-711. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyx036 http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00269 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.020 https://doi.org/10.7312/osto17730 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118143 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0889-z https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0490-3 https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701228938 https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2015.29003.ebr https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyx047 https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2016_459 https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.702 https://doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231174060.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00974 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116675512 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1136 https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyx036 Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 33 136 Sanz, C, Zamberlan, F, Erowid, E, & Tagliazucchi, E (2018). The experience elicited by hallucinogens presents the highest similarity to dreaming within a large database of psychoactive substance reports. Frontiers in neuroscience, 12: 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00007 137 Saracino, R, Kolva, E, Rosenfeld, B, & Breitbart, W (2015). Measuring social support in patients with advanced medical illnesses: An analysis of the Duke–UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Palliative and Supportive Care, 13(05): 1153-1163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951514000996 138 Saslow, L. R., John, O. P., Piff, P. K., Willer, R., Wong, E., Impett, E. A., ... & Keltner, D. (2013). The social significance of spirituality: New perspectives on the compassion–altruism relationship. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(3), 201. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031870 139 Schenberg, EE (2018). Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy: A paradigm shift in psychiatric research and development. Frontiers in pharmacology, 9: 733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00733 140 Scherer, M., Canham, S., Voas, R. B., & Furr-Holden, C. D. (2018). Intercorrelation of alcohol and other drug use disorders among a national sample of drivers. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 50(2), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2017.1366605 141 Schmid, Y, & Liechti, ME (2018). Long-lasting subjective effects of LSD in normal subjects. Psychopharmacology, 235(2): 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4733-3 142 Schmid, Y, Enzler, F, Gasser, P, Grouzmann, E, Preller, KH, Vollenweider, FX, ... & Liechti, ME (2015). Acute effects of lysergic acid diethylamide in healthy subjects. Biological psychiatry, 78(8): 544-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.11.015 143 Schnall, S, Roper, J, & Fessler, DM (2010). Elevation leads to altruistic behavior. Psychological Science, 21(3): 315-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609359882 144 Sepeda, ND, Clifton, JM, Doyle, LY, Lancelotta, R, Griffiths, RR, & Davis, AK (2019). Inhaled 5- methoxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine: Supportive context associated with positive acute and enduring effects. Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.033 145 Seuntjens, TG, Zeelenberg, M, Van de Ven, N, & Breugelmans, SM (2015). Dispositional greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6): 917. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000031 146 Shapiro, DH (1994). Examining the content and context of meditation: a challenge for psychology in the areas of stress management, psychotherapy, and religion/values. J Humanist Psychol, 34: 101–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678940344008 147 Smigielski, L, Kometer, M, Scheidegger, M, Krähenmann, R, Huber, T, & Vollenweider, FX (2019). Characterization and prediction of acute and sustained response to psychedelic psilocybin in a mindfulness group retreat. Scientific reports, 9(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50612-3 148 Smigielski, L, Scheidegger, M, Kometer, M, & Vollenweider, FX (2019). Psilocybin-assisted mindfulness training modulates self-consciousness and brain default mode network connectivity with lasting effects. NeuroImage, 196: 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.009 149 Smith, BW, Guzman, A, & Erickson, K (2018). The Unconditional Self-Kindness Scale: Assessing the ability to respond with kindness to threats to the self. Mindfulness, 9(6): 1713-1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0912-5 150 Smith, KW, Avis, NE, & Assmann, SF (1999). Distinguishing between quality of life and health status in quality of life research: a meta-analysis. Quality of Life Research, 8(5): 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008928518577 151 Soler, J, Elices, M, Dominguez-Clavé, E, Pascual, JC, Feilding, A, Navarro-Gil, M, ... & Riba, J (2018). Four weekly ayahuasca sessions lead to increases in “acceptance” capacities: a comparison study with a standard 8-week mindfulness training program. Frontiers in pharmacology, 9: 224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00224 152 Soler, J, Elices, M, Franquesa, A, Barker, S, Friedlander, P, Feilding, A., ... & Riba, J (2016). Exploring the therapeutic potential of Ayahuasca: acute intake increases mindfulness-related capacities. Psychopharmacology, 233(5): 823-829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-4162-0 153 Stansbury, KA (2019). The Influence of Psychedelic Induced Ego-Dissolution on Self-Compassion. California State University, Long Beach. http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00007 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951514000996 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031870 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00733 https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2017.1366605 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4733-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.11.015 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609359882 https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2019.033 https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000031 https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678940344008 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50612-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.009 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0912-5 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008928518577 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00224 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-4162-0 Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 34 154 Steptoe, A, O'Donnell, K, Marmot, M, & Wardle, J (2008). Positive affect, psychological well-being, and good sleep. Journal of psychosomatic research, 64(4): 409-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.11.008 155 Stolaroff, MJ (1999). Are psychedelics useful in the practice of Buddhism?. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 39(1): 60-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167899391009 156 Stolaroff, MJ, Jean, MW, & Merrell-Wolff, F (2002). Using psychedelics wisely. Hallucinogens: A reader, 94-103. 157 Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson. 158 Thomas, G, Lucas, P, Capler, NR, Tupper, KW, & Martin, G (2013). Ayahuasca-assisted therapy for addiction: results from a preliminary observational study in Canada. Curr Drug Abuse Rev, 6(1): 30- 42. https://doi.org/10.2174/15733998113099990003 159 Travis, F, & Parim, N (2017). Default mode network activation and Transcendental Meditation practice: Focused Attention or Automatic Self-transcending?. Brain and Cognition, 111: 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.08.009 160 Trichter, S, Klimo, J, & Krippner, S (2009). Changes in spirituality among ayahuasca ceremony novice participants. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 41(2): 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2009.10399905 161 US Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2007). National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2016, (NSDUH-2007-DS0001). 162 Uthaug, MV, Van Oorsouw, K, Kuypers, KPC, Van Boxtel, M, Broers, NJ, Mason, NL, ... & Ramaekers, JG (2018). Sub-acute and long-term effects of ayahuasca on affect and cognitive thinking style and their association with ego dissolution. Psychopharmacology, 235(10): 2979-2989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-4988-3 163 Uthaug, MV, Lancelotta, R, van Oorsouw, K, Kuypers, KPC, Mason, N, Rak, J, ... & Páleníček, T (2019). A single inhalation of vapor from dried toad secretion containing 5-methoxy-N, N- dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) in a naturalistic setting is related to sustained enhancement of satisfaction with life, mindfulness-related capacities, and a decrement of psychopathological symptoms. Psychopharmacology, 236(9): 2653-2666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05236-w 164 Vago, DR, & David, SA (2012). Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART): a framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6: 296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00296 165 Vandecreek, L, & Nye, C (1993). Testing the death transcendence scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32(3): 279-283. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386666 166 Verhaeghen, P (2019). The mindfulness manifold: Exploring how self-preoccupation, self-compassion, and self-transcendence translate mindfulness into positive psychological outcomes. Mindfulness, 10(1): 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0959-3 167 Walsh, R (1982). Psychedelics and psychological well-being. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 22(3): 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167882223004 168 Walsh, Z, Hendricks, PS, Smith, S, Kosson, DS, Thiessen, MS, Lucas, P, & Swogger, MT (2016). Hallucinogen use and intimate partner violence: Prospective evidence consistent with protective effects among men with histories of problematic substance use. Journal of psychopharmacology, 30(7): 601-607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116642538 169 Watson, D, & Clark, LA (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule- Expanded Form. Ames: The University of Iowa. https://doi.org/10.17077/48vt-m4t2 170 Wayment, HA, Bauer, JJ, & Sylaska, K (2014). The Quiet Ego Scale: Measuring the compassionate self- identity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(4): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9546-z 171 Whelan, A, & Johnson, MI (2018). Lysergic acid diethylamide and psilocybin for the management of patients with persistent pain: a potential role?. Pain management, 8(3): 217-229. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2017-0068 http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.11.008 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167899391009 https://doi.org/10.2174/15733998113099990003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.08.009 https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2009.10399905 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-4988-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05236-w https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00296 https://doi.org/10.2307/1386666 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0959-3 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167882223004 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881116642538 https://doi.org/10.17077/48vt-m4t2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9546-z https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2017-0068 Psychedelics and psychological strengths Brasher, Rosen, & Spinella www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org 35 172 Wood, AM, Froh, JJ, & Geraghty, AW (2010). Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical psychology review, 30(7): 890-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005 173 Worthington, EL, Jr, Davis, DE, Hook, JN, & Provencher, C (2018). Humility. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology. Subjective well-being and life satisfaction (p. 168–183). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200153-1 174 Worthington, EL, Witvliet, CVO, Pietrini, P, & Miller, AJ (2007). Forgiveness, health, and well-being: A review of evidence for emotional versus decisional forgiveness, dispositional forgivingness, and reduced unforgiveness. Journal of behavioral medicine, 30(4): 291-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865- 007-9105-8 175 Yaden, DB, Haidt, J, Hood Jr, RW, Vago, DR, & Newberg, AB (2017). The varieties of self-transcendent experience. Review of general psychology, 21(2): 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000102 176 Yaden, D. B., Kaufman, S. B., Hyde, E., Chirico, A., Gaggioli, A., Zhang, J. W., & Keltner, D. (2019). The development of the Awe Experience Scale (AWE-S): A multifactorial measure for a complex emotion. The journal of positive psychology, 14(4), 474-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1484940 177 Young, SN (2013). Single treatments that have lasting effects: some thoughts on the antidepressant effects of ketamine and botulinum toxin and the anxiolytic effect of psilocybin. Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience: JPN, 38(2): 78. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.120128 178 Zeifman, R, Wagner, AC, Watts, R, Kettner, H, Mertens, LJ, & Carhart-Harris, R (2020). Post- Psychedelic Reductions in Experiential Avoidance Are Associated with Decreases in Depression Severity and Suicidal Ideation. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00782 179 Kettner, H., Rosas, F. E., Timmermann, C., Kärtner, L., Carhart-Harris, R. L., & Roseman, L. (2021). Psychedelic communitas: intersubjective experience during psychedelic group sessions predicts enduring changes in psychological wellbeing and social connectedness. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.623985 180 Prepeliczay, S. (2002). Socio-cultural and psychological aspects of contemporary LSD use in Germany. Journal of Drug Issues, 32(2), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260203200207 181 Prochazkova, L., Lippelt, D. P., Colzato, L. S., Kuchar, M., Sjoerds, Z., & Hommel, B. (2018). Exploring the effect of microdosing psychedelics on creativity in an open-label natural setting. Psychopharmacology, 235(12), 3401-3413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-5049-7 182 St. Arnaud, K. O., & Sharpe, D. (2022). Contextual parameters associated with positive and negative mental health in recreational psychedelic users. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2022.2039815 183 Strassman RJ. Adverse reactions to psychedelic drugs. A review of the literature. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1984;172:577–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198410000-00001 184 Vardy MM, Kay SR. LSD psychosis or LSD-induced schizophrenia? A multimethod inquiry. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40:877–83. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790070067008 185 Anastasopoulos G, Photiades H. Effects of LSD-25 on relatives of schizophrenic patients. J Ment Sci. 1962;108:95–8. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.108.452.95 186 Wolf, G., Singh, S., Blakolmer, K., Lerer, L., Lifschytz, T., Heresco-Levy, U., ... & Lerer, B. (2022). Could psychedelic drugs have a role in the treatment of schizophrenia? Rationale and strategy for safe implementation. Molecular Psychiatry, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01832-z 187 St Arnaud, K. O., & Sharpe, D. (2022). Opening to Awe: Psychedelic-Assisted Self-Transcendence and Positive Adult Development. Journal of Adult Development, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-022- 09419-2 http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200153-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-007-9105-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-007-9105-8 https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000102 https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1484940 https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.120128 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00782 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.623985 https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260203200207 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-5049-7 https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2022.2039815 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198410000-00001 https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790070067008 https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.108.452.95 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01832-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-022-09419-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-022-09419-2