Şener, S., & Bostan, D. (2017). Using posters in EFL 

classroom: An elementary school case. International 

Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 

4(4),552-560. 

http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/242/190 

 

Received: 19.07.2017 
Received in revised form:  04.08.2017 

Accepted:  10.09.2017 

 

USING POSTERS IN EFL CLASSROOM: AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CASE
1
 

 

Sabriye Şener  

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University 

sabriyesener@mu.edu.tr  

 

Derya Bostan  

Ministry of Education 

deryabstn@gmail.com  

 

Sabriye Şener holds a PhD from Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University (Çanakkale, Turkey), 

and is an assistant professor of teaching English as a foreign language. Her interests are 

learning strategies and learner differences. She is currently employed at Muğla Sıtkı Koçman 

University, ELT Department, Muğla, Turkey. 

 

Derya Bostan is an English Language Teacher at Fatih Secondary School and a master 

student at Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University. 

 

Copyright by Informascope. Material published and so copyrighted may not be published 

elsewhere without the written permission of IOJET. 

  

                                                        
1
 This paper was presented as an oral presentation at GlobELT 2017 An International Conference on 

Teaching and Learning English as an Additional language held in Ephesus-Turkey on May 18-21, 

2017. 
 
 

http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/242/190
mailto:sabriyesener@mu.edu.tr
mailto:deryabstn@gmail.com
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4926-8940
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8955-2703


Şener & Bostan 

    

552 

USING POSTERS IN EFL CLASSROOMS: AN ELEMENTARY 

SCHOOL CASE 

 

Sabriye Şener 

sabriyesener@mu.edu.tr   

 

Derya Bostan 

deryabstn@gmail.com  

 

Abstract 

It is assumed that vocabulary learning is an important component of learning a second or 

foreign language. There is also an agreement that it is central to language and of critical 

importance to the typical language learner. Since vocabulary knowledge is what foreign 

language learners most need, it is necessary to facilitate this process. The present study aims 

to determine the effect of posters on the vocabulary learning of students without any teacher 

instruction. It also aims to explore gender differences in learning vocabulary items on posters. 

The participants of the study include 54 fourth graders, studying at an elementary school in 

Muğla. The study was carried out during 2015-2016 academic year. The data were gathered 

by means of a vocabulary test containing 30 items that was used as the pre and post-test. Data 

analysis showed that posters in language classrooms helped vocabulary learning process. The 

mean score of the experimental group has increased from M=6.72 to M=14.24. Moreover, a 

significant difference was determined between the scores of females and males. The study 

showed that the post-test scores of females (M= 16.15) and males (M=12.69) were 

significantly different. It can be concluded that in foreign language classrooms utilizing from 

posters can be beneficial. 

Keywords: posters, teacher instruction, peripheral learning, vocabulary 

 

1. Introduction 

Visual aids in classes are found to be beneficial since they draw attention and facilitate 

noticing (Çetin & Flamand, 2013). Allen, Kate & Marquez (2011) suggest that they supply 

the learners with an additional sensory perception. They are suggested in many approaches; 

in Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) for example audio-visual aids are highly 

utilized with the aim of drawing the attention of learners and making them more enthusiastic 

about the subject. In the Direct method, visuals help to convey the meanings of words or 

concepts.  

One of the visual materials used in foreign language classes is educational posters which 

are used for various purposes. Visualizing the words or concepts via posters/pictures is a way 

of getting the attention of the learners. They are both visual and textual aids that can be 

hanged on classroom walls (Çetin & Flamand, 2013). By using them, teachers can visualize 

and contextualize the subject (Buell, as cited in Gezer, Şen & Alcı, 2012).  Since vocabulary 

knowledge is one of the vital components of learning a foreign language and sufficient 

amount of vocabulary knowledge is necessary, in language classrooms posters are widely 

preferred by language teachers.  

mailto:sabriyesener@mu.edu.tr
mailto:deryabstn@gmail.com


International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET) 2017, 4(4), 552-560. 

 

553 

Regarding vocabulary learning, there are two main approaches; explicit/intentional and 

incidental vocabulary learning. Explicit learning is intentional and planned while incidental 

learning is a by-product process of doing something else (Hatch & Brown, 1995). Gass (as 

cited in Rieder, 2003) argued that it should not have been disregarded that vocabulary 

learning even incidental one require some extent of attention of the learners. Input does not 

necessarily need to be given intentional attention to become intake of learners. However, it is 

also stated that passive learners are more likely to be unsuccessful compared to the ones that 

pay attention to the stimuli (Schmidt, 2001). That’s why, using posters, including relevant 

vocabulary and structures, during classes seems to have much better effect on vocabulary 

learning process.  

Peripheral learning is another way of learning vocabulary items. Lazanov (as cited in 

Fatemipour, 2012) proposed the method named Suggestopedia, in which teachers support 

what learners like and “desuggest” what they dislike. Peripheral learning is one of the most 

important items in Suggestopedia method. It is defined as “… learning from the environment 

that the students are present in”. It is the learning process of students from presented 

materials even if they are not directed to them (Badri, Badri, & Badri, 2015). Çetin and 

Flamand (2013) introduced “Self-directed inferential learning” concept emphasizing active 

role of the students without any type of instruction. They accept that visuals or educational 

posters are good supporters for vocabulary learning; however, they go one step further and 

conclude that posters also trigger self-directed learning in which there is not any intentional 

direction for the students; they absorb what are presented on classroom walls.  

A number of research studies in different educational settings regarding the role of posters 

in vocabulary learning have been carried out.  Research studies can be generally analyzed in 

three different groups: (1) Studies that investigated how teachers and students benefitted from 

poster in EFL/ESL classrooms (Al Mamun, 2014; Dolati & Richards, 2010; Osa & Musser, 

2004; Zerin & Khan, 2013). (2) Studies that investigated the effect of posters/peripheral 

learning on vocabulary learning of the students (Badri et al., 2015; Çetin & Flamand, 2013; 

Gezer, Sen, & Alcı, 2012). (3) Studies that investigated the effect of peripheral learning on 

motivation and spelling skills of students and how the amount of peripheral learning affected 

the learning process of the learners (Fatemipour, 2013; Mohamadpur, 2013; Rokni, Porasghar 

& Taziki, 2014). 

Al Mamun (2014) investigated how learners and teachers benefitted from audio-visual 

materials. The researcher used observation and interview method and concluded that both 

sides favored the use of audio-visual materials thinking that they were beneficial for both 

teaching and learning process. According to interview results, teachers believed that such 

materials were useful in language classroom to teach four skills.  In another study, Dolati and 

Richards (2010) concluded that visual materials and peripheral learning significantly 

enhanced English classrooms and teachers preferred to utilize visuals to facilitate 

learning/teaching process. Osa and Musser (2004) searched for the value of posters in 

educational setting and they concluded that posters created a more stimulating and interesting 

environment for learning. Zerin and Khan (2013) analyzed the effect of poster-making 

activity in English classroom in primary level Bangladesh setting. They concluded that poster 

making made classes more dynamic and positive. Another conclusion was that posters helped 

to improve language proficiency. 

As for the effect of posters/peripheral learning on vocabulary learning studies carried out 

in different contexts found similar results. Çetin and Flamand (2013) concluded that using 

posters resulted in self-directed learning in the experimental group. Similarly, in Badri et al. 

(2015), students in the experimental group benefitted from the posters and increased their 



Şener & Bostan 

    

554 

vocabulary level. Gezer et al. (2012) searched for the effect of posters to teach idioms to 

university students. They also looked for gender effect on utilizing posters. They concluded 

that peripheral learning is helpful to teach idioms; however, they did not find a significant 

difference between male and female participants. 

In the third category the researchers, who examined the effect of peripheral learning on 

motivation and spelling of the learners, noticed that peripheral learning could facilitate 

spelling (Rokni et al., 2014). In Mohamadpur’s (2013) study it was found out that posters 

increased learners’ motivation and the best motivator was posters. Fatemipour (2013) 

compared ESL and EFL contexts to understand the effect of the amount of peripheral 

learning. He analyzed Iranian and Indian university students and suggested that EFL learners 

should be provided with as much visual stimuli as possible to enhance learning. 

In second language learning/teaching, gender was used as a variable in some studies 

(Gezer et al., 2012; Llach & Gallego, 2012; Soureshjani, 2011) and inconsistent results were 

obtained. To give examples, Soureshjani (2011) found that males and females use different 

learning strategies to determine the meaning of unknown words. However; Llach and Gallego 

(2012) studied the amount of vocabulary size of males and females and found that there was 

not a significant difference in size and vocabulary development of males and females. In this 

quasi-experimental research study, female learners seemed to gain more vocabulary than 

males in the first weeks of the study, though.  Similarly, in the Turkish context, Gezer et al., 

(2012) in their study stated that the existence of difference between males and females during 

learning idioms through posters was not determined. 

Research on the effect of posters and the role of peripheral learning is limited. The main 

goal of this study is to determine the effect of educational posters on vocabulary learning in 

foreign language classes. As a secondary aim the role of gender on self-directed vocabulary 

learning was investigated. Although there are some studies on the effect of posters on 

vocabulary learning, the present study particularly focuses on elementary school students’. 

To achieve this aim, the following research questions were designed. 

1. What is the effect of educational posters on vocabulary learning without any 
instruction?   

2. Does vocabulary learning via peripheral learning differ in terms of gender? 

2. The Study 

In this study a quasi-experimental research design (control group design) was employed. 

Control group design allows the researchers to ensure that any change is the result of 

treatment, not anything else. This is much easier for EFL classroom when compared to ESL 

classrooms. In order to measure the effect of treatment, pretest/posttest design was employed.  

This design leads researchers to determine the immediate effect on the participants (Mackey 

and Gass, 2005).  

2.1. Setting and Participants 

This study was carried out during the spring term of 2015-2016 education year at a state 

elementary school on the western coast of Turkey. The participants were 54 4th grade 

students, 27 females and 27 males, studying at Dumlupınar Primary State School in Muğla. 

The mean age of the participants was 10. The control group consisted of 25 students, 14 

females and 11 males, while experimental group included 29 students, 13 females and 16 

males. The background of the students (socioeconomic, cultural) was not very different from 

one another. They were all beginner learners of English. There were not any students who 

needed special education or with severe health problems such as seeing or hearing.  



International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET) 2017, 4(4), 552-560. 

 

555 

Convenience sampling method was employed to select the participants. There were 5 

different 4th grade classes in this school. One of the classes was on the first floor, one was on 

the third floor and three were on the second floor of the building. In order to prevent the 

participants in the control group from being exposed to posters, the students in the classes on 

the first and on the third floor were included. 

2.2. Instruments 

A vocabulary test was designed by the researchers by examining samples (Çetin & 

Flamand, 2013; MEB-achievement tests) used by other researchers and getting expert 

support. The test included four main parts as A B C D, targeting 30 vocabulary items in total. 

The number of items in each part is written below. 

Part A / 8 items: Circling the English word for the given picture  

Part B / 7 items: Matching English words with their Turkish equivalents 

Part C / 8 items: Writing Turkish equivalents of the English words  

Part D / 7 items: Filling in the blanks with the English words given in the table    

The same test was used as the pre-test and the post-test to see the differences in the 

vocabulary knowledge of the learners in two different groups. The pictures used in pre and 

post-tests were not the same pictures as in the posters in order to prevent learners to 

memorize the visuals. The aim was to increase reliability. They were different pictures but 

they represented the same word.   

Five posters were used in the experimental group. The posters were designed by 

researchers utilizing photos and pictures from the Internet. The words were selected from 

concrete items instead of abstract terms in order to prevent any misunderstanding. Each 

poster had a theme or context (in kitchen, by the lake, in the grocery store, while cooking, in 

the park). There were six words in each poster. The researchers were sure that participants 

had not encountered target words before. The length of the poster is the same for all (50cm), 

but the width of the posters varied slightly. They had nearly the same sizes. 

3.3. Data Collection and Analysis 

As data collection procedure, pre-test and post-test were applied. The pre-test was 

applied in two classes simultaneously without any prior announcement to students. The 

posters were hanged on the walls of the experimental group for three weeks. The students did 

not receive any teacher direction or explicit teaching about the posters during three weeks. 

The posters were not included in the planned activities. The aim was to determine the effect 

of posters and self-directed inferential learning on the participants. The same test was applied 

as the post-test after three weeks in both of the classes again to see if there was a difference 

between two groups.  

Data were analysed using SPSS 22. As there were only two groups to compare, 

independent sample t-test and paired sample t-tests were used aiming to see if there was any 

significant difference between the groups. The analysis of the data were put under categories 

and presented in the tables in the results section.  

4. Findings and Discussion 

The first phase of results part is about pre-test and post-test results. Independent t-test 

statistics were used to see the difference between control and experimental group regarding 

means of pre-test scores.  

 



Şener & Bostan 

    

556 

Table1. Independent sample t-test for pre-test results 

                              N   Mean   Std. Deviation   Std. Error Mean t df Sig. 

Control Group      25      6.88          1.856                    .371            -1.863      52       .068           

Exp. Group           29      8.07          2.685                    .499 

As shown in Table 1, means of two groups are close to each other and there is not a 

significant difference in pre-test (p=.068). That’s why it is assumed that there is homogeneity 

in terms of vocabulary knowledge of the participants. 

Table 2. Independent sample t-test for post-test results 

                                 N       Mean    Std. Deviation     Std. Error Mean      t      df       Sig. 

Control Group         25       6.72 2,227                    .445               -8.662    52      .000 

Exp. Group         29      14.24 3.814                    .708  

Independent sample t-test results for post-test illustrates that the existence of posters on 

class walls in the experimental group during 3 weeks created a significance difference 

between control and experimental groups in terms of test results. Control group’s mean has 

decreased because some participants have got lower scores in post-test than pre-test (M1= 6. 

88 M2= 6.72). On the other hand, regarding post-test scores of experimental group, there is a 

significant difference (p=.000). Mean of experimental group has increased from 6.72 to 

14.24.  

In order to see whether there is a difference according to the sections/question types in the 

exam, the difference between two group’s test results were disaggregated by the sections of 

the test. There is significant difference only for section A (choosing word for given picture) 

(p<. 001). The means of the sections were analyzed and it was found that Section A got the 

highest scores while Section D got the lowest scores. It may be discussed that only hanging 

posters does not guarantee that student can use the words in some sentences/contextualizing 

the words. The learners seem to need different strategies or exercises to do better in Section 

D. Therefore, the researchers stressed that educational posters should be utilized in EFL 

classes. They are beneficial on their own but if they are supported with some exercise or 

teacher instruction, the learners may internalize them more easily. The study of Alemi and 

Tayebi (as cited in Rokni et al., 2014) showed that students actually paid some attention in 

order to learn vocabulary items peripherally. The authors also concluded that peripheral 

learning could be achieved through posters; however, if they were supported with some 

vocabulary exercises (intentional learning) then the process could be more effective. Input 

did not necessarily need to be given intentional attention to become intake of learners. 

However, it was also stated that passive learners were more likely to be unsuccessful 

compared to the ones that pay attention to the stimuli (Schmidt, 2001). That’s why active use 

of posters during classes seemed to have much better effect on vocabulary learning process. 

 

 

 



International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET) 2017, 4(4), 552-560. 

 

557 

Table 3. Paired sample t-test of pre-test results for control group 

                       N        Mean      Std. Deviation     Std. Error Mean    t      df     Sig(2-tailed) 

Pre-test          25        6. 88       1. 856                      . 371                . 679     24         . 504 

Post-test        25        6. 72             2. 227                     . 445 

 

Table 4. Paired sample t-test of pre-test results for experimental group    

                       N        Mean      Std. Deviation     Std. Error Mean     t      df    Sig(2-tailed) 

Pre-test          29         8 07       2. 685              . 499           -9. 651 28 . 000 

Post-test        29       14. 24       3. 814              . 708 

Paired sample t-test, as illustrated in Table3 and Table4, revealed that there is not a 

significant difference (p=.504) between the results of pre and post-tests for control group. 

However, for experimental group there is a significant difference (p=.000) between pre and 

post-tests. These results show that posters have an important effect on the results of 

vocabulary tests and they facilitate self-directed L2 vocabulary learning. Although the posters 

were not supported with teacher direction or any vocabulary exercise, they helped learners to 

gain some vocabulary items. 

Similar results were observed in Çetin and Flamand (2013) and Mohamadpur (2013), 

Larsen- Freeman and Anderson’s (2011) studies. The existence of educational posters was 

found to be beneficial for vocabulary learning process without teacher direction. Rokni et al. 

(2014) have also found that the learners can learn more easily when they do not intend it. 

Therefore it seems reasonable to hang posters to let the students learn vocabulary items 

without much support. Moreover; Badri et al. (2015) concluded that posters should be 

facilitated to enhance the capacity of learning in EFL classes. They found a significant 

difference between experimental and control group regarding post-test results meaning that 

exposure to posters peripherally have a positive effect on vocabulary learning. 

Table 5. Independent sample t-test of pre and post-test for experimental group 

                   Gender  N   Mean  Std. Deviation  Std. Error Mean        t     df     Sig(2-tailed) 

Pre-test      Female    13     8.46     2.184         .606         .703      27  .488 

                  Male       16      7.75     3.066         .766  

Post-test    Female    13     16.15     2.267         .6292       .692      27  .012 

                  Male        16     12.69     4.159        1.040  

In order to gain deeper knowledge about the effects of posters, gender effect on test results 

is also analyzed. This analysis is done only for experimental group since the aim is to see the 

effect of posters regarding genders of the participants. The results are illustrated in Table5 

that shows there is a significant difference between male and female participants’ post-test 

results. To understand the effect of posters, firstly pre-test of experimental group was 

analyzed regarding gender. It is shown in Table5 that there is not a significant difference 



Şener & Bostan 

    

558 

between female and male participants’ test results (p=.488). On the other hand the difference 

in post-test scores of female and male participants is significant (p=.012). To summarize, this 

difference shows that females have benefited posters more than males. Gender creates 

differences in social and cognitive areas. Research studies found out that females are more 

capable of acquiring first and second language (Larsen-Freeman & Long, 1991).  

Gender differences issue in EFL and ESL classrooms have been examined by researchers 

(Gezer et al., 2012; Llach & Gallego, 2012; Soureshjani, 2011). However, study results are 

inconclusive. Some studies resulted in favoring one gender to another regarding EFL success 

while some studies take gender as ineffective on EFL&ESL process (Llach & Gallego, 2012). 

The results change according to individual, social, cultural and linguistic factors. The present 

study reached the conclusion that female learners did significantly better than male ones 

which shows that girls utilized posters more than boys.  However, Gezer et al. (2012) 

concluded that posters were beneficial for English idioms learning while peripheral learning 

doesn’t differ in terms of gender. However; in their study university students were examined. 

The situation may be different for primary level.  

6. Conclusion 

    This study aimed to examine the effect of educational posters on vocabulary learning in a 

primary level EFL class. The results indicated that existence of posters without teacher 

direction ended with an increase in mean score of the experimental group. That means 

educational posters can be effective visual aids to teach EFL vocabulary at primary level. 

Findings of the present study are important since vocabulary knowledge is a vital component 

in foreign language education.  

     The second point that the researchers looked for was gender effect on utilizing the posters. 

Post-test data analyses showed that mean score of females was higher than mean score of 

males in the experimental group. Female participants were found to benefit educational 

posters more than males. That finding was compatible with the idea that girls are more prone 

to learn a foreign language than boys. 

     Researchers concluded that existence of educational posters facilitated self-directed 

learning process. Another conclusion was that girls benefitted posters more than boys did. 

Students may not need teacher direction or instruction to utilize posters, but if posters are 

used in class activities, the effect of them can be more significant. More research studies are 

needed to prove this suggestion. A third group exposing to teacher direction/instruction about 

the posters may be added in a further study.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET) 2017, 4(4), 552-560. 

 

559 

References 

Al Mamun, A. (2014). Effectiveness of audiovisual aids in language teaching in tertiary level 

(MA Thesis). BRAC University, Bangladesh. 

Allen, K., & Marquez, A. (2011). Teaching vocabulary with visual aids. Journal of Kao Ying 

Industrial & Commercial Vocational High School, 1(9), 1-5. Retrieved from 

http://210.60.110.11/reading/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/10022007.pdf 

Badri, A., Badri, A., & Badri, G. (2015). The effects of peripheral teaching on Iranian EFL 

vocabulary improvement. International Journal of Educational Investigation, 2(1), 10-

18. 

Çetin, Y., & Flamand, L. (2012). Posters, self-directed learning, and L2 vocabulary 

acquisition. ELT Journal, 67(1), 52-61.  

Dolati, R., & Richards, C. (2010). Harnessing the use of visual aids in the English language 

classroom. Arab World English Journal, 2(2229-9327), 3-17. 

Fatemipour, H. (2013). Peripheral learning of English language: A comparison between ESL 

and EFL contexts provided for University students. Procedia Social and Behavioral 

Sciences, 93(2013), 1394-1397. 

Gezer, M., Şen, B., & Alcı, B. (2012). The effect of peripheral learning applied in English 

instruction on English idioms learning. The International Journal of Educational 

Researchers, 3(3), 19-34. 

Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. New York: 

Cambridge University Press. 

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition 

research. London: Longman. 

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching (2
nd

 ed). 

Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language 

teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. 

Llach, M. P. A., & Gallego M. T. (2012). Vocabulary knowledge development and gender 

differences in a second language. Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada 12, 45-75. 

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. 

Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 

Mohamadpur, M. (2013). Effects of peripheral English learning and creating motivation on 

Iranian secondary school EFL learners of elementary level. Journal of Literature, 

Languages and Linguistics, 2(2013), 44-45. 

Osa, J. O.,  & Musser, L. R (2004). The role of posters in teacher education programs. 

Education Libraries, 27(1), 16-21. 

Rieder, A. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning in incidental vocabulary acquisition. Vienna 
English Working Papers, 12(2), 24-39. 

Rokni, S., Porasghar, H., & Taziki, Z. (2014). Effect of peripheral learning on EFL learners' 

spelling. International Journal of English Language, Literature, and Humanities, 

1(5), 201-2015. 



Şener & Bostan 

    

560 

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language 

instruction (pp. 1-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Soureshjani, K. H. (2011). Gender-oriented use of vocabulary strategies: A comparative 

study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(7), 898-902.  

Zerin, S., & Khan S. A. (2013). Poster- A visual stimulus for active learning. GSTF 

International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 3(1), 129-134.