116 keith evan green student design work citadel a precise anomaly conceived by the studio, an architectural advertisement for public display and reaction. over a five week term, students were asked to design an alternative to auckland's visitor information centre on its current downtown site adjacent to auckland town hall on aotea square. what is a "visitor's center "? what is "auckland"? how can a building help to define a place ? how can one account for the vital transformations in the other ? at the outset of the italian renaissance, leon battista alberti encountered similar complications when describing the citadel. he explained that while the citadel was initially "a place of piety and religion," it soon became "one of cruelty and excess." for alberti, the citadel was an anomaly, a place which was "neither inside nor outside the town" one defined alternatively as a "pinnacle of the whole world or lock of the city." "in short," he wrote, "a citadel should be conceived and built like a small town." following from the complications presented by alberti's suggestion, members of the studio were asked to reflect upon the situation of both /1 auckland" and it's "visitor's centre". for this studio, i proposed a particular "tactic" which might serve as an economical vehicle for pondering the particulars of the architectural situation, to discourage the abstruse and long-winded diatribes sometimes invented or appropriated, without discrimination, by students of architecture. members of the studio were thus asked to conceive their "visitors center" and /1 citadel" following from an oxymoron, a written figure consisting of just two words set in a tense relationship which might represent their unique vision of the city of auckland. in this way, "auckland" and "visitor's centre" were defined in the projects shown here as a "fragmented collective" and a "responsible deception". while arriving at their figurative representations of the city, students wondered whether "auckland" might be mythical or real, whether /1 auckland" is a past, present and i or future, and how "auckland" might feel, taste, and smell. at the outset of the studio, each member of the studio conceived his or her own oxymoron and presented this along with five graphic images that demonstrated it. thereafter, members of the studio worked to develop a precise, anomalous architecture following from their oxymoronic conception of /1 auckland" and "visitor's centre". the discovery of this anomalous citadel was represented with the utmost precision in drawings. responsible deception nick melrose, fifth year student 117 • the visitor's centre can never fully define the vitality of auckland as a systematic, static phenomenon. at best, the centre acknowledges this difficulty and proposes to responsibly deceive the visitor. as in the city itself, the visitor to the centre is required to navigate his or her way through an ever-changing landscape of images, offered as electronic information by instruments which themselves define the interior space of this public place. while the historical centers of europe might be described as a collective form, auckland's is relatively fragmented. but the city, as an ever-transforming situation, inherently has something of both the fragmented and the collective. fragmented collective melinda trask, third year student auckland and it's visitor's centre is here described as a fragmented collective. visitors enter the centre through an oscillating passageway that brings them to a cylindrical volume, a "pin" . here, across a reception desk, the visitor meets a worker who can obtain the desired printed information about the city. this information is retrieved from the walls of the cubic volume, essentially composed of leaflets. the elevator tower is accessible only to the worker, who can descend to an underground level to retrieve additional leaflets, or ascend to survey the situation of the city. after the encounter with the worker, the visitor exits through a linear passage and returns to auckland, somehow changed. -:l ross jenner the spaces between for some time now a need has been felt to set up another platform for architecture in this strangely dislocated part of the world where an architectural culture can be said scarcely to exist. important developments in thinking about architecture have been ignored or actively resisted here. it is our premise that architecture only happens in an environment of critical discussion and debate. we hope to offer a forum for the discussion and development of issues and ideas important to architecture without the restrictions of immediate commercial appeal which has hitherto been a 'justification' for the lack of a thoughtful treatment of architecture which elsewhere is taken for granted. 'justification' because ultimately important assumptions which for many must not be broken open and examined underlie this resistance to architecture and to theory. the intention of this journal is not to reaffirm existing normative standards and canons, nor to rest comfortably in the supposed self-sufficiency of the building object, regional identity, composition, nature, function or other modes. of legitimating work here but to explore the interstices, the gaps and fractures within an institution that appears solid, secure and fixed. it is the spaces between idea and thing where perfect correspondence is never quite found, demanding a realm of endless negotiation and interpretation that we see as productive. this is the sort of mismatch that damisch observes relative to viollet-le-duc where he says 'the "truth" of a building is not to be found in bricks and mortar any more than in the outer form. no, it lies in the space between them, that which makes them complementary, in that space where style is born, in that gap between things which is intimated in the absence of a logical link ... ', this is not a 'project' for an all-embracing account of things but a sounding of the cavities within the walls which sustain architecture. what interests us is the recognition that no formal schema posed in terms of composition, structure, or function can any longer adequately cover either the production or the account of the design in hand, where with the invasion of language into every area of problematics in architecture, in the resulting absence of centre and origin, everything becomes susceptible to the play of discourse. similarly questions of place, identity, regionalism, biculturalism, relations between the modem and the " , non-modem, thrown into prominence by the recent call for the design of a national museum, in this light can only be posed in terms of the conjunctural, constituted by negotiation, splicing, juxtaposition, collage. cultural factors are seen to be mixed, relational, inventive, mobile, with uncertain boundaries, not constituted by stable essences or polar opposites. it is also becoming clear that, while architecture must measure up to the quality of critical thinking demonstrated in other disciplines, there are gaps through the walls, institutionally defined disciplinary boundaries are being increasingly threatened and crossed. a productive tension is found sliding through the intervals, a labyrinthine exploration of the interstices, to risk 'speaking into the void'. our intention is to publish original writing generated from the under construction seminar series hosted now ~or the last three years at the department of architecture, university of auckland, whose aim initially to produce an increased consciousness in architectural circles of developments in theory in all disciplines, unexpectedly became a platform which did not seem to exist in the wider university. we aim to provide illustration and discussion of current architecture from new zealand, the pacific rim, and those from further afield which we see as being of interest and relevance to local practice, student work from the schools of architecture, translation of significant writing on architecture, and extended book reviews. letters will be treated with serious consideration, our interest is in fostering and continuing discussion not in sustaining a monolithic position. view from northwest. long weekend house gingin, western australia simon anderson and kate hislop granville community centre, gingin wa. 118 the long weekend house is situated on a 1.3 hectare site in the town ofgingin (population 540), 85 kilometres north of perth and 35 kilometres from the coast on the dandaragan plateau. the site has north and west distant views over gardens to the beermullah and swan coastal plains. it is designed to be used by the architects three days a week as a house/office/holiday house. it is the sort of house that cannot be readily accommodated in the city: expansive, pool, tennis court, gardens. the house adjoins the town football and show ground and its nearest contempora1y neighbours are the town recreation and community centres, both built in the spreading gingin vernacular of columned brick commanding lowly-elevated landscapes. the clients have spent many years working in the heavy and numerous colonnades of uwa and holidaying at rottnest island in the colurnnated cottages of herny vincent (1840s) and r j ferguson (1970s). together local context and history conspired to produce a colonnade, in fact a double colonnade, here formally superior to the exigencies of the domestic programme, save for the removal of one column around the hearth. the plan owes its length and narrowness to the late shingle style houses of mckim, mead & white (such as the low, appleton and cowdin houses), and its siting to john horbury hunt's pittington bungalow. it is gabled form of the low house made lower, inflected by hunt. it is spread form from the rural sheds of "belltrees" and the swan valley and it is the reverse timber frame of traditional construction, especially seen in queensland. it is terraced from the carre house of alvar aalto. it is post-colonnade rather than post-colonial, post-modem rather than post-modem: a post-post house. 1 driveway 2 pool 3 tennis court 3 eb ~ 0 2 5 10 alvar aalto . carre house , bazochessur-guyonne, france. gingin recreation centre, gingin wa. cattle sheds, "belltrees," scone nsw. shed, west swan wa. 119 1---------1 i d d i i i i i : 3 : i i r------------------------=----------_j l____ _ ------ci11 . a a 0 ~~------.. i 2 a d d 5 3 l_o ______ _ _ g _ ___ _ _ j;j _______ g_ _____ _p _ ____ g_o _ _ _ __p _ _ __ __ _g __ _ 0 1 2 5 10 ljl eb henry vincent. s up erinte nde nt 's house, rottnest wa, 1842. rj ferg uson. holiday cottage, rottnest wa. 120 1 carport 2 store/workshop 3 verandah 4 entry 5 bedroom i ii south elevation. north elevation. longitudinal section looking south. 6 7 8 9 3 i i i i i i d : i i i i i i i ____ g_ _ __ __ _ q ______ q..j bathroom study kitchen/din ing living r l1111 111i111 1 east elevation. west elevation. cross-section through living room looking east. cameron chisholm nicol . reid library, the university of western australia . forbes & fitzhardinge. mathematics building, the university of western australia. rj ferguson. lawrence wilson art gallery, the university of western australia . mckim, mead & white . low house, bristol , long island usa john horbury hunt. spurling house, brighton victoria . john horbury hunt. pittington bungalow, mt victoria nsw . . ··<_ 121 in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e 132 editorial / from beaux-arts to bim f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m interstices: journal of architecture and related arts is an open forum for the dissemination of architecture and thought. it is a non-profit journal published once a year. to remain independent, interstices relies upon institutional and private support to fund its editorial production. annual individual sponsorship is available from $500; corporate sponsorship from $1,000; and institutional sponsorship from $3,000. sponsors will receive full acknowledgement of their contribution in each issue of interstices for which they are a sponsor. this issue is supported by school of architecture + planning, university of auckland, school of art + design, auckland university of technology (institutional sponsors) and moller architects, architectus, warren and mahoney, jasmax (corporate sponsors) executive editors andrew douglas (andrew. douglas@aut.ac.nz) and ross jenner (r.jenner@auckland.ac.nz) co-ordinating editor susan hedges issue editor julia gatley contributors this issue michael davis, robert freestone, sam kebbell, milica mađanovic, gill matthewson, ann mcewan, aaron paterson, patrick reynolds, christoph schnoor, linda tyler, and lucy vete design and typography catherine griffiths typefaces founders grotesk, tiempos text klim type foundry production catherine griffiths and louise belcher web programming steve huynh published by enigma : he aupiki, auckland, new zealand september 2018 issn 1170-585x (print) issn 2537-9194 (online) this work is entitled to the full protection given by the copyright act 1962 to the holders of the copyright and reproduction of any substantial passage from the work except for the educational purposes therein specified is a breach of the copyright of the author and/or publisher. this copyright extends to all forms of photocopying and any storing of material in any kind of information retrieval system. interstices: journal of architecture and related arts takes a non-exclusive copyright in the papers submitted and accepted, i.e., we reserve the right to publish and republish the paper (for instance, electronically). authors are welcome to upload their papers in published form into their institution’s research repository. they retain the right to republish their papers elsewhere, provided that they acknowledge original publication in interstices. all applications by third parties, for reproduction in any form, should be made to the executive editors. submissions the editors invite submissions of articles, reports, book and project reviews, and translations. all correspondence should be addressed to the editors, interstices, school of art and design, aut university, private bag 92006, auckland 1020, new zealand. books for review and advertising should be forwarded to the executive editors, above. notes and guidelines for contributors can be found at http://interstices.ac.nz/ information-for-contributors/ guidelines-for-submissions/ acknowledgements we gratefully acknowledge the support of the very many people who have contributed to the realisation and quality of interstices auckland school centenary special issue in various ways—including, but not limited to, the blind refereeing of papers. they are elizabeth aitken rose, peggy deamer, andrew douglas, robert freestone, susan hedges, glen hill, mark jackson, ross jenner, andrew leach, russell lowe, mirjana lozanovska, ann mcewan, james mcgregor, bill mckay, alessandro melis, caroline miller, michael milojevic, tanja poppelreuter, marc aurel schnabel, christoph schnoor, robin skinner, bill taylor, sarah treadwell, linda tyler, paul walker, julie willis, and peter wood. we thank all those who presented research at the 2017 centenary symposium, “educating architects and planners, 1917–2017”. thanks to catherine griffiths and louise belcher for designing and copy editing this issue. if we have inadvertently overlooked anyone, we apologise. thanks also to the school of architecture and planning at the university of auckland and the school of art and design at auckland university of technology. and, finally, a big thank-you to all the contributors to interstices auckland school centenary special issue! www.interstices.ac.nz editorial advisory board aotearoa/new zealand mike austin (unitec institute of technology), dan fleming (university of waikato), robert jahnke (massey university), laurence simmons (university of auckland), a.-chr. (tina) engels-schwarzpaul (auckland university of technology) australia suzie attiwell (rmit university), jillian hamilton (queensland university of technology), stephen loo (university of new south wales), mirjana lozanovska (deakin university), john macarthur (university of queensland), jeff malpas (university of tasmania), paul walker (university of melbourne) germany uta brandes (köln international school of design), ursula baus (frei04-publizistik, stuttgart) italy renato rizzi (università iuav di venezia, architect trento), nigel ryan (architect, rome) sweden hélène frichot (kth royal institute of technology) uae bechir kenzari (united arab emirates university) uk mark dorrian (edinburgh college of art), anthony hoete (what_ architecture, london), sally jane norman (university of sussex), peg rawes (the bartlett school of architecture), joseph rykwert (emeritus paul philippe cret professor) usa peggy deamer (yale university), mark goulthorpe (mit, decoi architects paris), jonathan lamb (vanderbilt university), david leatherbarrow (university of pennsylvania), moana nepia (university of hawai’i at mānoa) colophon jo u rn a l o f a rc h it ec tu re a n d r el a te d a rt s interstices02.indb 115 new zealand has a genius for genealogy. māori trace their whakapapa back to a fi rst canoe and many european new zealanders track their ancestral spoor back to a fi rst ship. who you’re from, where you’re from – perhaps it isn’t surprising that issues of identity are of concern in a country that is a remote fragment of larger landforms and bigger societies. though a preoccupation with descent may be endemic, it is, mercifully, not mandatory. for instance, i presume my forebears dwelt in various irish bogs. some may even have been princes of their patches of peat. who knows, and, at this remove, who cares? the point is, clan or family history matters more to some than others; it matters most, of course, to those who evoke the past in support of territorial claims. how important is the question of lineage in new zealand architecture? a recent and happy coincidence of anniversaries offers some indication. over the summer of 2005-06 three of the country’s larger architecture practices celebrated fi fty years of professional existence. the birthday boys – a literal description: the practices cannot muster one female partner between them – were aucklandbased asc architects; stephenson & turner, which has offi ces in auckland and wellington; and warren and mahoney, which has offi ces in auckland, wellington and christchurch. all three practices gave some thought to how they should acknowledge their silver jubilee; in ascending order of pomp, let’s look at what they came up with. asc architects marked their milestone with an edition of their occasional twopage newsletter and a party at a café next to their city-fringe premises. this effort – comparatively modest, as we’ll see – suggests a busy offi ce, or ambivalence towards self-promotion, or a lukewarm interest in genealogy (or all three). certainly, asc does not have a pretentious persona, and the fi rm’s low-key celebration of reaching fi fty was in keeping with its journey there. the history of asc serves as a reminder that, for all the debate about whether architecture is an art or a craft, it is also a business. the practice now known as asc architects was established by the late nyall coleman. gordon moller, the immediate past president of the new zealand institute of architects, worked for coleman in the early 1960s and remembers his employer as, “a very urbane gentleman”. a catholic, who drew upon his social contacts to get school commissions, and a businessman who recognised the value of the repeat client, coleman exemplifi ed the normal type of successful twentieth century architectural practitioner. that is, he wasn’t an auteur, but rather a respectable professional man. though coleman did well in his career he didn’t make it into the kiwi canon, and though his fi rm has endured his name has long since disappeared from its title (the “c” in asc is neil cotton). asc’s continuity is attributable to an overlap of personnel, not to dynastic succession. genius and genealogy john walsh interstices 07 so, no ancestor worship at asc, and maybe its founder would have wanted it that way. filial piety, at least formally, is more evident at stephenson & turner, and self-esteem more obvious. on its fi ftieth birthday s&t hosted functions with a high suit count at the price waterhouse tower on auckland’s waterfront (architect: stephenson & turner) and te papa in wellington. guests were welcomed by a hired raconteur and farewelled with a complimentary copy of a history commissioned by the practice (publisher: balasoglou books; rrp $59.95). very establishment, very corporate, very much in keeping with s&t’s reputation as a practice that does the business for fi nance companies, health boards and government departments. and true to the memory of the fi rm’s progenitor, sir arthur george stephenson (1890-1967), knight of the british empire, holder of the military cross, fellow of the riba, raia, and nzia, and recipient of riba and raia gold medals. now there’s a father fi gure, and s&t have been pretty happy to follow in the footsteps left by his big brogues. however, there have been a couple of issues along the way. for one thing, sir arthur and his company were australian, and in new zealand stephenson & turner started out as a branch offi ce. separation from the australian parent eventually occurred, but not without some anxiety. it must have been tempting to signal a new start with a new name, perhaps some clever piece of architectonic lexicology. but s&t didn’t get where they are by essaying hip, and they stuck with the brand. by keeping dad’s name, stephenson & turner acknowledged that they had embraced their destiny. no apparent regrets, just a hint, now and then, of wistfulness: those who have chosen to work in prose must occasionally wish they’d opted for poetry. warren and mahoney’s anniversary celebrations were the most ambitious of all. birthday bashes in christchurch, wellington and auckland served as launch parties for a monograph that, even priced at $110, must have cost the practice a small fortune to produce (again the publisher is balasoglou books). it is the best-looking architecture book to have been published in new zealand, though it’s title is a real mouthful: new territory/warren and mahoney//50 years of new zealand architecture. or: vision/brand//history. in this book warren and mahoney are both claiming and reclaiming territory. the practice wants to have it both ways: it is established (in terms of back catalogue warren and mahoney are the lennon and mccartney of new zealand architecture) and it is innovative (the practice seems to believe it has the local franchise for environmentally sustainable design). what the book also announces is that the practice has worked out an answer to the question of miles. for a while the fi rm’s partners seemed intent on escaping the shadow of w&m’s famous (and still very much extant) founder, sir miles warren. edging down the route to professional parricide, they even changed the practice name to architecture warren and mahoney. the redundant prefi x is gone now. warren and mahoney, as one would expect of a practice sired in origin-conscious christchurch, has realised the advantages of its inheritance. to put it another way: if you’re descended from genius, there’s good reason to be a genealogist. sroaroa.r iz naaur 22 rediscovering the city zwischenwelt in rovereto principal: r rizzi project team: f. allocca, c. bosio. the city is in a: process of moving away more and more from its quality of having 'place' because it is being rapidly homogenised. this has already happened in the peripheral areas and now there is a danger that the same contamination may happen even for the central areas. in other words, it seems almost that the ways and customs that have progressively taken root in the suburbs are able to become models for imitation in designing the zones inside the city, forgetting that there exists an enormous bundle of generative grammars that have been produced from a slow process of modification and that these possess the features of an urban character. the character of place in terms of rovereto the site represents a very important 'void', for all the city, a place in which figurative memory finds its expressive, oneiric forms, where the circus, the tournament, games, festivals: had their stage of illusion, a camivalesque place. an indefinite place, however, that could fill up until it almost burst or remain empty, a void unutilised, transversed only by children's incursions. this place of thousands of limits and also of no limit, _has a precious richness in defining the differential character of rovereto. this space, a little protected, enclosed, this space of forgetting, has maintained its character of marginality even though surrounded by the contemporary city. an area with certain invisible aspects, free, that has never participated in and that has never been absorbed by urban re-organisation and has always resisted any transformational programme. the historic iconography a reading of historical images traces a process of modification principally by cancellations, by the loss of signs, by successive and continuing enfeebling to the point of their total disappearance. the constituent elements that structured the plan small canals that incised the borders: the enclosing walls that are inscribed on the countryside represented the continuation of an urban landscape much more articulate, much more complex than that deduced from the few remaining archaeological traces or indications some of them describe the entire development of a network of waterways, illustrating and recounting with an incredible precision and richness all the possible ~j ~~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ i 1 j ~i 23 \ diversions, controls, closures, barriers, types of canals, locks, wheels dislocated along the entire tracing. the value of these maps is in being able to restore a tangled world of images, of sounds, noises, it allows us to see the entanglement of the timbers with the fine threads of silk in a deafening rotation of gears rotted by water, which wrap around each other setting the scene now for the great urban machine. only in the book invisible cities by italo calvino can one savour again this fascinating intricacy and from a different point of view, some sort of analogy is offered by the machines of jean tinguely. but one can interpret other things from these maps. it is the particular way of holding together the region, countryside, architecture even the particular internal constructs of the figure. everything comes to be presented by their own image, all is expressible through the figures of a refined aesthetic logic. .> the planning programme above all the project is the endeavour to give a contemporary description of the city, it is the possibility of an urban narration through the figure. it expresses an undeniable aesthetic necessity if one wants the city to turn into a representation of itself grounding its own legitimacy on the necessity of use and not the contrary. therefore, the assumptions or themes of the figurative plan are: a. the theme of the void: to construct the void as a distinct characteristic of the area; b. the theme of transgression: to permit the possibility of welcoming again, the circus, the tournaments, the festivals, the games also fairs and markets at the limit; c. the theme of inversion: to bind the area whether to the historic texture or to the modern orthogonaloutlines, upsetting sense. while the more .rigid contemporary plan imposed itself on the more delicate historical plan cancelling it out, now the historic generative grammars assume preeminence over the modern organising syntaxes. d. the theme of the citation: the use of traces fragments, analogous figures, coming from the text of the city and from the iconographic memories, as referential citations e. the theme of the theatrical: the insertion of the great natural landscape, the mountains inside the urban rim as a new and fascinating theme of the modern. the figurativeprogramme two worlds, two landscapes look for their own space of confluence in the project. the first is an horizontal space, taut, even slightly concave, that almost covers 24 completely the entire area. it is the space that represents the void, the place where anything can happen. it should resemble a piazza but it is not exactly that. it is a space liberated, open to everything and anybody, not institutionalised, whose one rule is that it no one possess it. placed some metres above the level of the street it acts as roof it could be more opportune to say, as shield for the area below full of activity. it is a space that refers to the modem city, to its horizontal expansion. the second represents a vertical space, deep, dense, from the forced and controlled views. the landscape of the border. it changes radically depending on the different ways one approaches it. if one travels along it in an east-west direction, following the development of the historical city, it becomes a true urban street of more levels, rich with objects and figurative surprises, supported by a building-wall that will also welcome residential use. it reflects a modem sloping of the street of the historical areas, since it places itself as an ideal continuity with it. the compactness of the fronts, the continual suspension, floating between a below and an above produces the analogy of serried and articulated perspectives. if instead one comes from the north towards the south, the direction of the modem city, the edge is transformed into a soft organised margin of trees. a linear park of tall trees with the ground lower than the level of the streets becomes furrowed by the transversing pathways. the figurative tension that it produces between the edge and the horizontal space makes a series of objects emerge, fragments that are none other than circulation spaces stairs, ramps, entrances, bridges, gangways between the two diverse systems. to establish a reverberation between the opposite edges they reflect the traces extracted from the pre-existing buildings in the area. standing in a central position one can, moreover, observe a hierarchy of horizons. the first is given by its own limits, the second those that appear at the edge higher than 2.4 metres the third from the limits of the foliage of the trees, the fourth the urban skyline and last of all the scenography of the mountains. the point of view of the observer is no longer external to the city, but instead inside. it is no longer possible to perceive the city in its totality but only through parts, through traces and the texture of the fields in this case, no longer convex but concave since it is no longer nature but architecture. the figure had to exceed its own confines (the physical confines of the area) to display its expressive charge derived from the confrontation with the different texts of the city. it had to search for a profound rootedness in memory and tradition knowing well that only thus could it possess the necessary strength to detach itself, to be able to reveal, to be transgressive and innovative. " 1 i~~ j 25 \ it has re-figured a middle space, a zwischenwelt, an 'in-between world' which together hold the irre-soluble conflict between the historic city and the modem city, between the tight, fine, horizontal spaces, and the dense vertical spaces, between the limits that separate and the limits that include in a continual and incessant exchange of roles. the figure has thus finally unveiled the disquieting images of the place making them legible, liberating them from the prison of history. "'.: ..i in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e 119 f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m review / sam kebbell penumbral reflections sarosh mulla and aaron paterson objectspace, auckland may 12–june 23, 2018 there is something slightly disconcerting about walking into an unfamiliar dark room, especially when there is a weird thing in the middle of it, but it also ignites my curiosity. the room, in this case, is the main gallery at objectspace, and the weird thing was made by aaron paterson and sarosh mulla, both of pac studio and the university of auckland school of architecture and planning. at first glance, it looks like a big black egg in an orthogonal nest, but it’s not. what is it? the big black egg is in fact a dark-tinted reflective disc. from the side at which i arrived, it is totally black, which is why it looks like an egg, but when i move around it i can see it has a slightly convex curve that distorts fig. 1 a big black egg in an orthogonal nest? [photograph by david st george] in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e 120 penumbral reflections sarosh mulla and aaron paterson objectspace, auckland may 12–june 23, 2018 f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m the reflections of the projectors aimed at it. i read in the project description on the wall that it is a claude glass. wikipedia tells me that in the eighteenth century, a claude glass was a portable black-tinted convex mirror that tourists and landscape painters used to turn expansive views of the landscape into an image, so i am looking at a brobdingnagian version of that. the nest is not really what i thought either. as random as the framing appeared when i walked in, it is actually a finely made metal frame that forms a 3.6 x 3.6 x 3.6-metre cube with vertical members spaced evenly down each side and embedded within it is a slightly rotated framework of similar proportions. the shadows of the frame appear on the claude glass and in the puddle of light in front of it. the rotated smaller framework sets up a diagonal geometry that also provides some lateral bracing. there are projections on the walls behind us too, which were produced in gaming engines as a digital simulation of certain visual qualities in the metal contraption. how do i look at it? if i was an eighteenth-century painter using this claude glass, these projections are where the landscape would be. i would be using the claude glass to look at that landscape, but here i am inclined to use that landscape to look at the claude glass. partly because i prefer to look at the finely crafted object and the complex play of light and shadow across it rather than the projected pixels on a flat wall. i circle it a few times wondering if i might stand in the puddle of light and take a good hard look into the claude glass as fig. 2 screenprint made as part of the design process. [screenprint by pac studio] 121 penumbral reflections sarosh mulla and aaron paterson objectspace, auckland may 12–june 23, 2018 f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e if staring into a giant eyeball. the gallerist senses my timidity and invites me to climb on in, so i do. i get very close to the claude glass, but i don’t touch it. i promise. it looks like polished metal, but the reflections make it hard to focus on the surface itself. it is more like peering into a strange phantasmagorical scene with my own eyeballs in the foreground. when i turn around though, i see my colleagues and a more prosaic reality takes over my mind. i start to think, if i had time, this might be quite a nice spot to pull up a few chairs and kick back with a drink. a sort of belvedere in a digital landscape. i can imagine looking out at this digital landscape and pondering one of the fundamentals of our trade: light, in its various forms and with its range of implications. the way light and dark produces apparent depth, even if the surface is in fact flat. the way a complete lack of tonal variation produces a totally different kind of depth, the kind of infinite depth james turrell has so often produced, and that the claude glass is capable of here. it is a relatively figs. 3-6 the claude glass, the frame that supports it, and the various projections. [photographs by david st george] in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e 122 penumbral reflections sarosh mulla and aaron paterson objectspace, auckland may 12–june 23, 2018 f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m dark room to ponder light, but maybe that in itself is something to ponder. even though light and shadow are a phenomenological couple, light has been the dominant partner under modernist regimes. in this sense, it is refreshing to wallow in the dark thinking about light. this contraption is also a good vantage point to ponder the tension between realities and digital simulation, given that screens, projected images, and pixels are very much part of our contemporary reality. on one hand, i ponder the exhibit as a string of simulations: projected images that simulate aspects of a contraption, and a contraption that simulates certain architectural qualities. on the other hand, i am conscious that all these simulations form the reality of the gallery space i am standing in. so i think of it all as both simulation and reality; i am both part of pac’s architecture, and part of their thinking about it. all this serves to reflect on the creative processes pac explore, and their relishing of the movement between different modes of architectural production. along this line of thought, it is hard not to consider pac’s built work and the frequent use of dark timbers, shadowy interiors, enclosed courtyards, and expressed framing. this room feels like an elaboration on those qualities but it pushes them to new extremes. it will be interesting to see if the built work also becomes more extreme as a result of this exercise. pieces of this exhibit will be relocated to the waikereru ecosanctuary near gisborne, and this might give us a clue to how this thinking will play out in larger buildings later. pac’s buildings matter to this exhibition because for all the play with simulation, it remains committed to architectural experience. while the claude glass does introduce certain narrative layers, the exhibition is not a representation of an idea that belongs outside of architecture. it relies less on some external narrative than on the attention i pay to my experience in the room, and the histories and potentials that surround that. yes, the claude glass is a historical device for looking at the landscape, and that’s not what is happening here, but the mechanics of the device have been co-opted at an architectural scale to look at architectural surroundings. the claude glass is not a metaphor here; it remains an instrument. 123 penumbral reflections sarosh mulla and aaron paterson objectspace, auckland may 12–june 23, 2018 f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e in fact, the whole exhibition is an instrument, a kind of multi-tool running on the fuel of light and shadow. i think it has less representational value than operational value. it is a contraption to produce depth, illusion, and distortion. it flips between reality and simulation, and it exposes creative fascinations with light and shadow. it is never quite what i think it is, and simple interpretations of it never quite resolve. but however much i slip off one idea and into another, i always feel immersed in architectural thinking: in drawing, digital modelling, experimenting with light, framing, looking, and fashioning some future situation. at this stage in the reflections, sitting in my real-imaginary belvedere, i have been utterly drawn into pac’s web. the various modes that architecture must exist within cannot easily be pulled apart on a clear day, and this contraption tangles them up even more. it is full of rich ambiguities, and insights into their multi-modal practice. this weird thing in the middle of the room is a real thing, for sure, but it also operates between the realms of simulation, representation, and imagination. i have been invigorated by the exchange between them. interstices02.indb interstices 07 just as men [sic] will want to stave off contradiction as much as possible in life, they seek an equal degree of comfort in science by decreeing as axiomatic that contradiction could not be real. … only contradiction drives us – indeed, forces us – to action. contradiction is in fact the venom of all life, and all vital motion is nothing but the attempt to overcome this poisoning (von schelling, 1997 [1813]: 124). most planners consider their profession to be primarily concerned with the aims of modern enlightenment. arguably, the enlightenment is the promotion of a spirit of progress resolutely seeking a superior world, a better future of light and purity for the collective good. the defi nition of better and good is open to contention, and, of course, herein lies the rub. in attempting to create, at least the appearance of, a level playing fi eld of fairness as to who defi nes the good, planning generally advocates a set of core values supportive of equity, democratic method and social justice. explicit forces seldom overwhelm these norms of fair process in most modern democracies. however, they are often overcome when confronted by subtle, and frequently unquestioned beliefs, or sometimes even overt authoritative rationalities, which seek to advance predispositions disproportionately supportive of the principles of wealth maximisation and its concentration, not to mention power, in our, now globalised, capitalistic system. when planning does fall short in applying this distributional ‘goodness’, or at least the appearance of fairness, many would consider that planning is no longer an agent of enlightenment. some authors consider this to be planning’s ‘dark side’, a term initially deployed by oren yiftachel (1995) and bent flyvbjerg (1995) in quite dissimilar circumstances. yiftachel’s use of the concept ‘dark side’ was as part of a title for an empirically based case study, illustrating how planning had been unashamedly deployed overtly by the israeli state as a mechanism of tribal control, land alienation and displacement of israeli arabs. flyvbjerg’s deployment of the term was as part of a broader critique of planning theory, which flyvbjerg argued to be synonymous with modernity’s wider inclination towards normative idealism. this is the propensity of modernity’s orthodox discourses of social science, and related ‘progressive’ disciplines, including planning, to see only what is desirable, as if one lived in an ideal and perfect planning’s contradicting genius within the twilight against the empty night michael gunder 107 social reality, devoid of contradiction, meanwhile unashamedly failing to notice what is actually occurring. in other words, modernity’s propensity is a desire for a fantasy of perfection and light – the perfect city shining in the light of perfect structures inhabited by the lightness of being provided by perfect angelic people. this is a fantasy especially perpetrated by traditionalist theoreticians of modernist planning, in which only the desired enlightened side is privileged, theorised and observed. the imperfect, dark side that constitutes a less coveted social reality of blemish and strife, is largely empirically overlooked. this agonistic reality is, flyvbjerg argues, the real rationality, or realrationalität, of the genuinely grounded world constituted by the imperfections of human striving, disagreement, desire and real-politics. it is an actuality of the heideggerian ‘being in the world’, which lacanians would suggest we desire to block out and, inauthentically, obscure with fantasies of ideological justifi cation and wish-fulfi lment. this allows us to preserve our desired delusions of a preferred genius – a spirit – that presents a world of sanctuary and certitude, not to mention a progression to an even better place on earth, even if this illusionary construct of social reality may be somewhat more appropriately predicated on a desire for enlightenment’s precursor; ie. the baroque, which sought the creation of a taste, illusion or simulation of heaven on earth, rather than a materialisation of the real thing. this delusion of solidity and safety, not to mention the dream, if not the fulfi lment, of the creation of heaven on earth, is consistent with another everyday fantasy of modernist social reality, a fantasy unequivocally facilitated by planning’s normative desire and advocacy for fairness. this is the fallacy that the state (in place of any former god) has concern and cares for us, provided we act responsibly in our duties to the state as good citizens. in lacanian parlance, we are desired, protected, and even loved by an abstract ‘big other’ that in its totality represents a fair social order. yet, lacan suggests that this big other does not exist, rather it is merely a desired illusion (2006: 688). further, it is an illusion perhaps believed and sought after most devotedly when society is being particularly unfair. for the very notion of the modern, its essence or central spirit, is perhaps the resultant aggregate product of our desired fantasies and their mandatory prerequisite not to challenge, or examine too fi nely, the cracks of contradiction in our beguiling dreams and ideals. accordingly, a dark side appraisal of our ideologically shaped reality may provide a helpful traversing of our fantasy constructs. it may be an intrinsically anti-modern intrusion for interrogating the outcomes of planning and other, more diverse, disclosures of the cultural and hegemonic movements that shape our public policies and actions. yet, theorising issues within the context of a light/dark dichotomy creates its own problematic. the traditional spirit of modernity, as well as other conventional forms of western thinking, are placed, or located, under the inexorable power of binary reason, an underlying logic that ed soja refers to, after derrida, as the “the terrorism of the either/or” (soja, 2003: 271). moreover, planning, and its related modernist disciplines, is seldom black or white in its agency. planning rarely attains absolute fairness. yet, similarly, it is seldom totally deceitful and discriminatory, at least within regimes that attempt to provide, at a minimum, the appearance of democratic rights for all citizens (perhaps in contrast to yiftachel’s israeli planning appararti). interstices 07 while perhaps a bane to some, a core role of planning is to supply an aspect of society’s paternal fi gure of authority and regulation, one that says: “no, you are not permitted to do that in this environment!” this regulatory function actually helps constitute our symbolically constructed culture and society. most consider this regulation a societal good, if applied with fairness towards an acceptable end. yet, as this seeming fairness or acceptable goal deteriorates towards what may be perceived by many as tyranny, planning, at a certain point, stops constituting a common good and develops into a specifi c blight. further, the point of change from being a benefi cial remedy to a toxic affl iction is usually undecidable, ambiguous, and generally dependent on one’s specifi c individual perspective and aims – be it those of developer, architect, or affected party (derrida, 1981: 125). fundamentally, the light/dark duality only favours the achievement of perfectly impossible ideals. this idealised transcendental perfection is beyond what is achievable by human knowledge, or even knowable by experience. the attainment of any transcendental ideal is impossible, by defi nition – indeed, a true contradiction. to suppose otherwise is, innately, a utopian dream of modernity, or some other similar faith. lacan suggests we have to acknowledge that our ideals will always come up short; they will always lack completeness and, even when the truth about our ideals is forthcoming, it may not be benefi cial (2004: 15). fundamentally, our ideals are so lacking in completeness that, over time, many turn out to be the cause of their initial decline and eventual obscurity. to paraphrase lacan, with a touch of deleuze, we simply overthrow the mastery of one transcendental ideal to replace it with the mastery of another, perpetuating a new void of lack, undecidability, contradiction and eventual dissatisfaction (129). i suggest that the modern human disciplines, including planning, which, on the whole, materialised as artefacts of modernity’s constant search for knowledge to contribute to the production of some better enlightened world, should not be considered as spirits that reside in either the light or dark: rather they should always be considered to reside somewhere in between. planning resides in perpetual twilight, for planning’s actual spirit of place – its specifi c genius loci – dwells somewhere between that of the empty darkness constituting the night of the world, and the divine light of our desires. planning and modernity’s other human practices of collective action are grey arts of chiaroscuro that take place in a shadowy reality of particularity and ambiguity (after hillier, 2002: 17). this is a social reality where our practices, norms and ideals are imperfect, lacking and incomplete, consistent with the imperfection which constitutes the human condition of inherent contradiction. here, perhaps, one task of academic critique is to expose these absences and tackle the illusions we form to cloak this emptiness. 109 references derrida, j. (1981). dissemination (b. johnson, trans.). chicago: the university of chicago press. flyvbjerg, b. (1995). the dark side of planning: rationality and realrationalität. in s. mandelbaum, l. mazza and r. burchell (eds.), explorations in planning theory (pp. 383-394). new brunswick, new jersey: rutgers press. hillier, j. (2002). shadows of power. london: routledge. lacan, j. (2004). the seminar of jacques lacan, book xvii, the other side of psychoanalysis: 1969-1970 (r. grigg. trans.). photocopy of translator’s manuscript. lacan, j. (2006). ecrits: the fi rst complete edition in english (b. fink. trans., in collaboration with h. fink and r. grigg). london: w. w. norton. soja, e. (2003). writing the city spatially. city 7(3), 269-280. von schelling, f. (1997 [1813]). ages of the world (j. norman. trans.). in s. žižek and f. von schelling the abyss of freedom/ages of the world (pp. 103-182). ann arbor: university of michigan press. yiftachel, o. (1995). the dark side of modernism: planning as control of an ethnic minority. in s. watson and k. gibson (eds.), postmodern cities and spaces (pp. 216-242). oxford: blackwell. j> qf the coo!t of xew zea.land t6jr111•rjvn' ,j,//t,.tn11v t/fj!j ,,;n/1j711 . r~i.cook; f'tm11111tnn?r r /,/h my!fft/.r 1j1rr-' endeavour; map of cook's voyage around the new zealand coast. (andrew david, ed., the charts and coastal views of captain cook's voyages) mapping landscape katrina simon maps are spatial representations which can in turn stimulate other spatial representations ... and representation is an act of knowledge construction. maceachron 1 maps are some of the most commonly used tools in landscape architecture. they are used to represent both large and small areas, whole regions and individual sites. they can show physical characteristics, both "natural" and "attificial," such as landform, river systems, areas of vegetation, infrastructure, roads and houses. they can also indicate things such as legal boundaries and controls, which may or may not be visible "on the ground" even though they are visible on the map. other things or qualities may be visible in the landscape and yet never appear on a map, being perhaps transient or ephemeral. maps are produced for specific reasons and they are selective. they simplify and edit in order to make certain things or relationships clearer. rachel potter. yet maps are often taken to be a complete and accurate picture of the world. they are frequently designed to look autltoritative and scientific. the history of cartography is the history of both the changing ways in which the world has been seen and understood, and of technical developments that have altered the ways in which the world could be seen and represented. the maps that we use today are based on specific procedures, assumptions and conventions that have become "naturalised"so familiar that we don't necessarily realise or notice that they are being used. 1. a . maceachron, how maps work: representation, visualization and design (new york: guilfo rd press, 1995), vii. tracey moore. 75 tracey moore. heidi monks. 76 charting the unknown some maps are particularly eloquent in the ways that literal and metaphorical discoveries in and of landscape are possible . one such image is the chart of new zealand made after captain cook's first voyage around the world in 1770. the general form of the passage of the endeavour around the coast. the map was projected and drawn from a continuous series of measurements and sketches done on the ship as it circumnavigated the islands. the map was constructed with the physical and mental tools available the two main islands is very recognisable, as it was a to cook: in other words, he brought the mechanisms relatively thorough and accurate survey. there are to make this map with him. like all maps, this was some significant "errors" with which most new zealanders are familiar: banks peninsula is shown as an island, and stewart island is shown as a peninsula. the kaipara harbour in the north of the north island, which is one of the largest harbours in the southern hemisphere, is missing entirely, as its narrow entrance was not seen or explored. the internal details of the two main islands are largely generalised from the landscape visible during the voyage around the produced for specific reasons (representing the known world, claiming land for britain) and it is selective. the map was not a property of the landmass, or an image or "print" of reality. the indication of the ship's path also reveals something about the exploration inherent in the mapmaking process. the map emerged gradually, just as the coast was gradually encountered, revealed and represented. at times the ship travelled away from coast. the coast in a seemingly haphazard fashion, while at one of the most interesting things about this other times it was anchored and cook went ashore map, however, is not the depiction of the landform with members of the crew and had a variety of enbut the curiously erratic dotted line which depicts counters with the landscape and the maori inhabit~ l 1 ants. cook's map was produced as part of a process which annexed and colonised "undiscovered" lands for britain. yet, unlike most modem maps which anonymously present their information, this map contains an acknowledgement of the construction that this (and every map) comprises. the dotted line is a recorder and a reminder of how the map was made, and by whom. this map is a representation which has a specific history and purpose, and uses a range of techniques to clarify, reveal or conceal that purpose . it also represents the arrival and transfer of a specific system of map-making to a part of the world where it has now become entrenched. this particular map from cook's voyage can also be read at a more personal level as the process of recording and unfolding. the unknown is rendered visible by the process of drawing--once it is drawn, it can be imagined in new ways, especially by those who will never actually see it. the way in which it comes to be drawn is based on a system of conventions which enable the representation of the previously unknown or previously unrecorded. value judgements are inherent in the process, as each map reveals different notions of"what's worth recording." cook's map provides an illustration of the map as historic artefact, as process and as metaphor, as a guide to moving in uncharted realms. it is also a reminder to present-day inhabitants of these islands that maps are simplified and distorted versions of reality. and of course, this representation of cook's "methods," "intentions" and "categories" is itself a "map" with its own formulations and agendas . kelly o'meara . margaret mckegg. 77 alexis barr. 2. daniel dorling and david fairbairn, mapping: ways of representing the world (harlow: longman, 1997). 3. james corner, "the agency of mapping : speculation, critique and invention," in mappings, ed. d. cosgrove (london: reaktion books, 1999). re-mapping rangitoto this studio took the map as a literal and metaphoririved from three aspects of cartographic production: cal device with which to design. maps have many the cartographic techniques of generalisation, such uses. they can be tools for navigation and exploratas exaggeration, masking, combination, displacement ion; they can provide a template for recording inforand omission;2 the process of contour interpolation mation discovered through exploration. they also which has a series of in-built assumptions about shape our expectations of what we will discover. landfotm; and the mechanics of making a new copy maps and plans don't exist in isolation but are part of a wide range of devices that reflect, organise and control space, both "real" and "imaginary" space. this project involved examining a number of different techniques, operations and procedures of map-making, and manipulating these in order to create a landscape proposal for a 20 by 20 metre site on rangitoto. rangitoto has a status as an icon of pristine nature. the island also resists conventional mapping, as it is a field of complex lava flows and adventitious vegetation. a site visit enabled a systematic measuring of transects and mapping of the found conditions of the landform, vegetation, and other features of the site. the specific procedures used as design operations on these initial drawings were deof a map, such as tracing, printing, pricking out, reflecting . all of these procedures were available to be used on the initial drawings of the site. the mapping process was thus used upon itself, not as a tool to reveal the "actual" state of the landscape, but as a generative act. as james comer observes, "as a creative project, mapping precipitates its most productive effects through a finding that is also a founding ; its agency lies in neither reproduction nor imposition, but rather in uncovering realities previously unseen or unimagined, even across seemingly exhausted grounds."3 by manipulating the to~ls by which we discover and represent landscape, we create new landscape possibilities. l traversing the city this project again took the map as a literal and metaphorical device with which to design. with the maps of the city that we keep in the glove compartment and hold in our heads, we navigate and negotiate our way through the urban landscape. the fabric and terrain of the city itself is shifting and restless, in a constant state of flux. maps and photographs record this succession of transitory states. every state leaves an impression, which can affect the subsequent state, just as every map or layer that is created can leave a physical or mental impression on the design process. the site for this project is presently used as a carpark. its distinctive terrain is a result of successive phases of building and demolition and its current use is yet another temporary phase in the constantly changing urban landscape. the task of this project was to create a linear park in a segment of this westfacing site, exploiting its location to create an alternative traverse between two major one-way streets. mapping the terrain, vegetation and detritus revealed a number of similar conditions to the rangitoto site, in spite of the highly modified nature of this urban site. again, different techniques, operations and procedures of map-making were examined. in particular, a series of procedures of elongationsuch as blurring, stretching, rolling and splicing-were used to manipulate initial mappings of the site and create a linear urban landscape. by manipulating the tools by which we discover and represent the landscape of the city, we create new urban landscape possibilities. heidi monks. richard smith . gerrard carey. in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 109 p r e s e n c e bios nina boyd nina boyd is an architectural graduate who completed her master of architecture (prof ) at victoria university wellington in 2017. since graduating she has worked as a tutor at the victoria university school of architecture and is working with toi āria design for public good and massey university college of creative arts on community engagement projects. konrad buhagiar konrad buhagiar obtained a degree in architecture and civil engineering at the university of malta followed by a post-graduate degree in studio e restauro dei monumenti at the universita’ di roma, ”la sapienza”. he is a founding partner of ap valletta and senior visiting lecturer at the university of malta. he has lectured in several countries abroad and is a member of the board of experts of the european urban space prize. he is co-editor of the founding myths of architecture (forthcoming). john dixon hunt john dixon hunt is professor emeritus of the history and theory of landscape at the university of pennsylvania. he has written over a dozen books on landscapes, and a biography of john ruskin in 1982, the wider sea. his book on ruskin’s watercolours will be published early in 2020  by reaktion books. andrew douglas andrew douglas is a senior lecturer in theory and design at the school of architecture and urban planning, where is also the current associate director of design. he previously taught spatial design at the school of art + design at auckland university of technology. he is a member of the turnspace collective, and an executive editor of interstices: journal of architecture and related arts. he currently chairs the enigma: he aupiki trust, and is a trustee on the greg bowron memorial trust. he has practiced architecture in both auckland and london and completed postgraduate studies at the university of auckland and goldsmiths, university of london. his research ranges across fields associated with urban and greek philosophy and history, aspects of continental philosophy—particularly the work of gilles deleuze and felix guattari—critical perspectives on socio-spatial practice, and gender and sexuality as these pertain to literature, cinema and the urban imaginary. his doctoral research investigated observation and reflectivity in modernity via accounts of walking in european contexts since the seventeenth century. his current research addresses the role of affect in emerging forms of publicness and governance, colonial-urban formations in aotearoa new zealand, and philosophies of image and imagination. carl douglas carl douglas is the curriculum leader for spatial design at auckland university of technology, auckland. his research circulates around two main themes: unprofessional space (informal, ad-hoc, illicit, and amateur space-making); and procedural design techniques (cartography, design computation, abstraction, drawing, and intuition). in previous work he has examined infrastructure as a determinant of public space, made a case study of urban transformations of revolutionary paris, and researched archaeological sites as scenes of architectural production. current research attends to design strategies for climate change and sea-level rise, and the construction of unorthodox cartographies. guillaume dreyfuss guillaume dreyfuss is director of research at architecture project (ap). guillaume is an art historian and obtained an msc in sustainable heritage from ucl (university college london). he is co-editor of a printed thing (2012), and the founding myths of architecture (forthcoming), and is the author of various academic papers. 110 biographies p r e s e n c e in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 mark jackson mark jackson is associate professor of design in the school of art and design, faculty of design and creative technologies, auckland university of technology (aut). he received his phd from the university of sydney in the discipline of architecture in the early 1990s and has taught at the university of sydney, the university of adelaide and at aut. his research engages the tradition of continental philosophy, especially the works of heidegger, foucault, derrida and agamben. he has published in the fields of architecture, landscape architecture, design cultures, film-philosophy, and the visual arts and has produced a number of film and video works. ephraim joris ephraim joris is a design director at ap valletta and a faculty member at ku leuven and piet zwart institute in rotterdam. his research looks at the idea of an architectural phenomenology recasting history as the experiential content of speculative architecture. this research stands at the basis of his design work at ap as much as his design work stands at the basis of his research. he contributed as a researcher and teacher to various institutions such as rmit, syracuse university, westminster university and brighton university. he has been a program director at uca in canterbury and ku leuven and is a current member of the mediated city research team at university college london. he is the author of various international publications and academic papers. adrian lo adrian lo completed his phd in architecture at the university of auckland, new zealand, where he also completed his bachelor’s degree. his research focuses on the processes and issues relating to space making, particularly the condition of interstitiality and in-between spaces in architecture and urbanism, such as that of peter eisenman, aires mateus, and urbanscapes in hong kong and kathmandu. he has practiced in hong kong and australia, and has held teaching positions in new zealand and nepal, specialising in architectural and urban design, historytheory, and final year theses. jules moloney jules moloney is associate dean research and innovation, school of design, rmit university, australia. he has held positions at the victoria university of wellington, the university of melbourne and the university of auckland. his academic career was preceded by a decade of architectural practice in the united kingdom. the distinctive approach he brings to his research and teaching is based on expertise in digital technology and the importance of grounding computational design within the wider context of theory and practice. felipe lanuza rilling felipe lanuza rilling is an architect trained at the university of chile, and obtained his master in architecture at the catholic university of chile. he holds a phd in architectural design from the bartlett school of architecture, ucl. through his investigations on absence, he explores processes of design and representation as a way of prompting new understandings and alternative interventions in the built environment. he has taught and exhibited internationally. he is a senior associate at urban transcripts, co-founder of dla scan / devilat + lanuza architects, and currently a post-doctoral researcher at the ucl urban laboratory/bartlett school of architecture. nicola short nicola short is a heritage consultant and lecturers in heritage and spatial environments at the school of art + design at auckland university of technology. with over 30 years’ experience in the heritage and glam sector she has held a range of roles in museums and local government, both in new zealand and overseas including; exhibition development australian museum, head public programmes, museum of transport and technology, auckland; heritage manager, auckland city council, and a secondment to christchurch city centre as lead heritage advisor, master planning team post the 2011 earthquakes. she is a member and has sat on the board of the international council on monuments and sites, new zealand chapter. nicola has a particular interest in heritage and social equity with a focus on heritage landscapes, strategic planning, public policy and cultural theory. her research interests include decolonisation and time, feminist theory, cartography and critical heritage theory with a particular focus on heritage landscape values and ontologies. she has a bachelor in art history 111 biographies p r e s e n c e in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 from auckland university and a masters from sydney university in museum studies and heritage management. she is published in the areas of; museum management and cultural capital, heritage landscape studies and #protectihumatao. she is a member of save our unique landscape (soul) and has written extensively on the role of heritage legislation and cultural heritage landscapes for the campaign. she is currently enrolling in a phd at the school of architecture and planning, auckland university. jan smitheram jan smitheram is a senior lecturer in the school of architecture at victoria university of wellington, where she teaches undergraduate and postgraduate students. her current research project involves working on a urf funded project researching how architects think about the body when they design. papers currently under preparation address questions of architectural representation, performativity, occupation and affect. simon twose simon twose is an architect and senior lecturer at the school of architecture, victoria university of wellington, new zealand. his work focuses on drawing, particularly in the territories between art and architecture practices. twose has published and exhibited widely, including invited contributions to five venice architecture biennales. stepan vaneyan stepan vaneyan was born in 1964 in moscow, where he currently resides. after graduating from the moscow lomonosov state university (1989), he worked at the moscow state museum of fine arts. his phd thesis on hans sedlmayr, and his doctoral dissertation was dedicated to the problems of the iconography of architecture. since 1998, vaneyan has been a professor of art history and theory at the faculty of history in the moscow state university. he teaches courses on art theory, methodologies of art history, history of western art criticism, psychology of art and architectural theory of the 20th century. he is also a senior researcher at the research institute of theory and history of fine arts in the russian academy of arts and a lead researcher at the state institute for art studies. interstices02.indb interstices 07 the wedding, royal new zealand ballet national tour. premiere performance aotea centre, auckland, march 1 2006 the red carpet was laid out for the opening night of the wedding. television cameras rolled on writer, witi ihimaera, as he shared a few last thoughts before curtain up. promises of strip dancing and all male shower scenes – on stage with the royal new zealand ballet had already sent ripples of anticipation throughout the land. bums on stage generally mean bums on seats, and this opening night looked like a sell-out. just as well. an investment of $1.7 million meant this was the most expensive production ever mounted by the royal new zealand ballet. as composer, gareth farr, acknowledged, “if we don’t get the sales and nobody wants to go, no one’s going to want to do it again” (watkin, 2006: 17). ihimaera approached the company fi ve years ago with an idea for a love story set amidst the multi-cultural reality of contemporary new zealand, “a new society on the brink of transformation” (ihimaera in conversation with the author, 1 july 2006). artistic director, gary harris, and company manager, sue paterson, were enthusiastic. they brought together part fijian, ex-pat choreographer, now director of london’s rambert dance company, mark baldwin, director/dramaturg, raymond hawthorne, gareth farr, and designer, tracy grant, to form, what tim watkin described in the weekly new zealand listener as, the “dream team” (2006: 15). on all fronts, expectations for this production were understandably high, especially given ihimaera’s stellar literary career, and award winning success with the fi lm, the whale rider (2003). ihimaera also promised to bring to ballet “an audience that ballet’s never had” (watkin, 2006: 17). a total of 21,067 people saw the wedding in auckland, napier, palmerston north, wellington, christchurch and dunedin (susana lei’ataua in conversation with the author, 5 july 2006). a more detailed account of audience fi gures, and percentages for the whole tour, has yet to be released. opening night, in auckland, was a glamorous event, with invited vip ‘wedding’ guests wining and dining in fi ne style; corporate sponsors mingled with politicians, artists huddled and exchanged notes. according to ihimaera, two busloads of school children from ruatoria travelled south, for several hours, to see the production in napier, and one performance in wellington was invaded by a contingent of goths (ihimaera in conversation with the author, 1 july 2006). the original storyline featured a part māori, part italian female lead, opportunities to portray samoan and hindu dance, a māori karanga (call of welcome), american in-laws, a gay love duet for two men, and, of course, the now famous post-rugby practice shower scene. the media loved the idea. ihimaera’s “my big fat kiwi wedding” portrait, with lead ballerina chantelle kerr, was on the front page of the new zealand listener (2006, march 4-10). after the hectic season fi nished, company publicist, susana lei’ataua, took a well-earned holiday on a fijian beach that wedding-planners anywhere would die for. a marriage of convenience? review by moana nepia 125 the famous shower scene. the audience was kept in suspense until well into the opening act. then, one by one, the men entered the shower-room. they soaped themselves up one side, then the other, and with a fl ick of their towels and a few jetés across front of stage, they were off like bouncy spring lambs. what a tease. this was defi nitely a family production. for the stag night, female strippers played it safe: they didn’t shed a thing. three male strippers, for the hen’s night out, did get their gear off down to what looked like oversize fl esh coloured panties. not sexy. if they had problems with being completely naked for the sake of art, a jock strap or a pair of y-fronts would have worked better. if they were feeling shy, they should have remembered they were not actually naked, and that in striptease it is the promise of something more that counts. inspired choreography could have had us gasping, if not blushing. the wedding was heralded as a groundbreaking ballet love story, but the love story got lost in the mix. by the time the leading couple reached the altar, i knew very little about them as individuals, except that the heroine and the delivery boy rekindled an old fl ame, when he appeared on her doorstep with fl owers that much i had already gleaned from the programme notes. the groom, who was american, played rugby, got angry and picked a fi ght with the fl ower boy at the altar. why, i am not exactly sure; earlier he had not seemed particularly in love with his fi ancée. for it to succeed, as dramatic ballet, the wedding needed a major element of tension or mystery. instead, the wedding planners delivered a comic spectacle, a pantomime complete with the frilliest pink wedding dress imaginable, a gorilla, swingers, koru fern frond set motifs, mini-skirted air-hostesses (who stole the show), a pastel chapel altar scene, and main protagonists who all lived ‘happily ever after a fi ght’. the original story had depicted people of all ages, shapes and sizes, but ballet dancers, as a rule, are generally neither fat nor old. little surprise then, that the rugby haka translated into something rather more aerial than grounded. the choreographic opportunity to investigate different cultural dance vocabularies and subvert conventional ballet language was also missed. mark baldwin exploited the familiar, elegant vocabulary and linear precision that ballet dancers train so arduously to perfect. however, there was no choreographic innovation; likewise, the musical score and design elements lacked any outstanding originality. i do not have a problem with the ballet company presenting light-hearted and populist work, but promoting it as “groundbreaking” is a patronising exaggeration, and to label the wedding “ruggedly indigenous” is misleading (watkin, 2006: 17). are we so gullible that we cannot see the work for what it is? perhaps raymond hawthorne hit the nail on the head when he said: “they’ll love it. the dancers all get en pointe and whiz around with their legs around their heads. what more can they want?” (watkin, 2006: 19). perhaps most new zealanders want ballet to be a pastiche of itself. do they also want new zealand to become a pastiche of itself? i rather hope not. the ballet company needs to aim higher; it is capable of much more than this. interstices 07 on the verge of a politically strategic tour to the people’s republic of china, in 1984, the newly appointed management of the royal new zealand ballet commissioned a new work, moko. the chinese had made a request for something distinctly new zealand, after noticing the glaring absence of any such work in the proposed programme. maori choreographer, piri sciascia, his wife, gaylene sciascia, maori artist, sandy adsett, and composer, ross harris, explored ancient and specifi cally maori themes and narratives in the making of this work. chinese, and new zealand, audiences alike may have had mixed feelings about the artistic outcome, but the symbolic gestures of goodwill were signifi cant. in 2001, the ballet company joined forces with mark baldwin and te matarae i orehu, one of the leading maori kapa haka performing arts groups. they shared an evening programme where there was little convergence of the different artistic traditions, but enough proximity to suggest further possibilities of working together. to what extent the healthy maori audience response to this season can be nurtured and sustained remains to be seen. in 2006, the wedding dream team could have made a much greater commitment to the themes of cultural diversity and interaction offered by maori writer, witi ihimaera. instead they delivered a simplifi ed story, a safe and pastel romp. a genuine engagement with indigenous themes could help to establish a cultural specifi city for the royal new zealand ballet. is this what new zealand audiences want? dame peggy van praagh founded the australian ballet with the aim of establishing a repertoire that had a clearly defi ned balance between classical ballet, modern ballet and australian work. her policy was instrumental in supporting australian choreography and choreographic talent. the aims of the royal new zealand ballet have never been as specifi c. the company’s current vision statement reads more like a report on the status quo, than a guide for the future: “the royal new zealand ballet is a company of 32 dynamic dancers, performing a wide range of choreographic works throughout new zealand and overseas”. it wants “to build a style and repertoire that is ultimately unique to the company”. perhaps this needs to be qualifi ed. commissioning new work from overseas is a good idea, and, aiming for a repertoire consisting of 30% new zealand choreography would be excellent. making a commitment to higher levels of artistic innovation, at all levels of production, must be commended. however, this demands long-term planning and fearless fi nancial application. perhaps the ballet company could learn a lesson or two from the music industry, where commitment to local music by producers, publicists and local radio has seen a huge increase in the success of new zealand music, both here and abroad. the ballet company would risk nothing but change by considering a bicultural aspect to its mission statement. classical ballet, after all, is an ethnic dance form that has evolved out of specifi c european movement traditions, myths and historical narratives. ballet continues to evolve elsewhere, incorporating musical and other cultural infl uences from latin america, asia and, particularly, the united states. the royal new zealand ballet needs commitment and a long-term vision if it is to achieve anything other than a superfi cial engagement with its own unique cultural position. 127 in the meantime, the reality of keeping a national institution such as the royal new zealand ballet afl oat, remains principally one of negotiating a delicate balance between box offi ce and artistic success: the two do not always neatly coincide. healthy audience numbers not only generate income, but also make the company a more attractive proposition for prospective corporate sponsors. this, in turn, means more investment in the status quo. as long as this cycle continues, the public feels confi dent ‘it must be doing well’ whatever the artistic merits or failings on stage. francesca horsley thought the wedding was destined to be a winner (horsley, 2006: 45). at the opening night gala, georgina te heu heu, opposition spokesperson for the arts said she loved it, and judging by the applause, so too did most of the audience. as gary harris has quite rightly asserted, “ballet is not brain surgery”: ballet is entertainment. ballet is also a form of spectacle, and, for many of us, an escape from reality, something impossibly un-real. ballet dancers are ‘super-human’ and much of what they do is beyond the physical capabilities of their audience. furthermore, some of the most sublime ballet moments happen when artists transcend the context of the most improbable fairy tale scenario and take us somewhere else, allowing us a moment to dream. whenever creative dreams are compromised, we compromise the potential to imagine anything better. references horsley, f. (2006, march 18-24). puce moments. new zealand listener 202, pp. 44-45. royal new zealand ballet (2005). retrieved 5 july, 2006, from http://www.nzballet.org. nz/company.html watkin, t. (2006, march 4-10). my big fat kiwi wedding. new zealand listener 202, pp. 14-19. in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 93 p r e s e n c e nina boyd with jan smitheram staging tourism: performing place in new zealand, tourism is tied to images of pristine landscapes into which architecture is admitted as a romanticised diversion from urban places. this project found in the “100% pure new zealand” tourism marketing campaign—initiated in 1999 (see tourism nz, 2019)—an opportunity to speculate on a greater potential for engagement between architecture and tourism. in short, it sought ways that architecture might be truly transformative for tourists. through this design research project, the relationship between architecture and the tourist experience was interrogated through increasing scales spanning from an installation to a hotel and finally an artificial island. instead of attending to tourists as if passive consumers of ‘sights/sites’, investigated here were the embodied performances tourism makes possible. architecture in turn was considered a stage for amplifying this performative dimension, with places themselves thought of as performances en route; rather than as fixed and incompatible with the hypermobility of tourism. mobilising the tourist the project was shaped by two key theoretical shifts in how tourism is understood from an architectural perspective. the first sought to recognise tourism and architecture as reciprocally related. hence the project built on the proposition that rather than being a backdrop to tourist experiences, architecture was thought as integral to these experiences (ockman and fraustro, 2005: 35). as such, architecture can be seen to build on tourist values to the extent that tourism sites are often redesigned and packaged for mass consumption (lasansky, 2004: 1). this understanding signals that tourism is simultaneously a process through which places are experienced and a force which shapes and interprets those places. the second theoretical shift looked to tourism studies to better rethink the presumption that tourism and the ‘tourist gaze’ are essentially passive (urry, 1992: 172). tourism was instead understood as a dynamic practice that is ‘performed’, and that architecture may amplify the multi-sensuous experiences deepening this performance of tourism. this emphasis on performance enabled a sensitivity to the way tourists inscribe themselves into space through social practices, (re) 94 staging tourism: performing place p r e s e n c e in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 producing place through their individual and collective enactments. attentive to the practice of ‘doing tourism’, this project considered a series of staged performances, choreographed through architecture as a mise-en-scene or theatricalising platform. drawing from both these theoretical threads, the project positioned architecture as central to the tourist experience and asked, how can architecture stage and amplify the embodied performances of tourism? expanding “wellywood” the investigation is sited in shelly bay, a former military base and emerging recreation hub along the coastline of the miramar peninsular in wellington, new zealand. the decision to focus the project around shelly bay came about before the announcement of a new, proposed $500 million-dollar development for the area. this development aimed to consolidate shelly bay as a burgeoning tourism hub on the periphery of the central city, one just 3km from wellington airport. the site is also adjacent to the popular movie tour route which operates in the area; it’s close to weta workshop and various nearby shooting locations for the fig. 1 author (2016). preliminary investigations into understanding the tourist through performance [photographic collage] 95 staging tourism: performing place p r e s e n c e in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 lord of the rings trilogy. parodically dubbed “wellywood” in recognition of the centrality of film production for the capital’s economy, the title similarly offers a marketing platform for the film-based tourism underpinning wellington’s tourism overall—a dominance that itself forces a re-examination of appeals to “authentic” tourist experiences typically associated with new zealand (tzanelli, 2004: 38). for the relationship between the shelly bay site and wellington’s urban placement overall, see figure 2. shifting scales to explore the relationship between architecture and tourism, a “design through research” methodology was employed where the design proposition developed through iterative experiments at increasing scales. in summary, three scales were explored: the first engaging with the human scale and culminated in a 1:1 installation; the second explored the performance of tourism through the design of a hotel; and the third proposed an artificial island to stage a range of public performances by tourists. working through these shifting scales allowed a critical revaluation of the proposition across different design registers. in more detail, the first design scale exploration extracted moments of interest from the shelly bay site and developed multiple scenarios through drawings and physical modelling (fig. 3). each of these experimental scenarios sought notions of place that incorporated movement and displacement. these qualities were translated into a series of physical objects in order to create a 1:1 installation (fig. 4). following these early experiments into fluid notions of place, site and placement, architecture and the performance of tourists were more directly engaged with and tested via the design of a hotel, itself thought of as a stage for “dwelling in mobilities”. this staged environment in fact offered revised potential for amplifying the corporeal, tactile experiences of tourists (penner, 2004: 219). fig. 2 author (2016). wellington harbour [photographic collage] 96 staging tourism: performing place p r e s e n c e in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 the hotel programme was employed as a tool to interrogate the usual partition of exotic and everyday aspects of the tourist experience. while hotels traditionally leave little room for the intersection of everyday routines with socially exuberant experiences—with private rooms divided from spaces of social interaction—in this experiment the hotel was designed to intersect socially exuberant performances with everyday routines to better encourage new “encounters, and opportunities for action” (dovey and dickson, 2002: 5). to do this, private spaces were made to continuously brush up against lively social spaces allowing the privatised routines of dwelling to be performed simultaneously with the dynamic mobilities associated with ‘doing tourism’ (fig. 5 and 6). fig. 3 author (2016). explorations of site movement and displacement [photograph of physical models] fig. 4 author (2016). physical models formed as 1:1 installation [photograph of physical models] fig. 5 author (2016). performing tourism within the hotel [composite digital images] 97 staging tourism: performing place p r e s e n c e in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 in the final stage of the project, the design of an artificial island offered a mise-enscene for investigating parodically the placemaking capacity of tourists through their individual and collective performances. the artificial island was located just off the shoreline of shelly bay and utilised surplus land dredged from wellington harbour for the proposed airport runway extension (figs. 7 and 8). fig. 7 author (2016). masterplan of the artificial island [composite digital image] fig. 8 author (2016). axonometric view of the artificial island [composite digital image] fig. 6 author (2016). performing tourism within the hotel [composite digital images] 98 staging tourism: performing place p r e s e n c e in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 figs. 9, 10 and 11 author (2016). ‘swim’, ‘see’ and ‘spend’: elements of the architectural programme toolkit [composite digital images] 99 staging tourism: performing place p r e s e n c e in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 figs. 12 and 13 author (2016). view of the island’s main public entrance via the gondola, and view of the heated sea baths [composite digital images] acts of relaxing, playing, sightseeing and spending were programmed into the island’s design through architectural gestures which invited the site to be used in multiple, intersecting ways thereby amplifying the performative nature of the enactments. a series of ‘architectural toolkits’ resulted. for instance, the ‘swim toolkit’ incorporated a diving board, thermal pools and sea baths which asserted the corporeal qualities of being in and with water. fountains heightened ‘eruptive’ and ‘splashing’ experience, while bobbing pontoons asserted floating sensations. these toolkits supported the notion of tourism as a dynamic practice integral with its enabling architecture. through their participation in these social practices, tourists were imagined to inscribe themselves into space and (re) produce places eventfully via their individual and collective performances (figs. 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13). to conclude, this project sees architecture as a central protagonist in developing an understanding of tourism through design, a proposition that situates the tourist not as a passive consumer of places but as “a dynamic force in creating them” (crang, 1997: 74). as such, this design research project asserts that while the performances of tourists can be staged through architectural mis-en-scene, tourists themselves produce place through their individual and collective performances. consequently, neither tourism nor place can be assessed as merely products; instead, their intertwining incessantly performs places. 100 staging tourism: performing place p r e s e n c e in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 references crang, m. (1997). picturing practices: research through the tourist gaze. progress in human geography, 21(3), 359-373. dovey, k. & dickson, s. (2002). architecture and freedom? programmatic innovation in the work of koolhaas/oma. journal of architectural education, 56(1), 4-13. lasansky, d. m., & mclaren, b. (2004). architecture and tourism: perception, performance, and place. oxford, uk & new york, ny: berg. ockman, j. & frausto, s. (eds.) (2005). architourism. authentic, escapist, exotic, spectacular. munich: prestel. penner, b. (2004). doing it right: postwar honeymoon resorts in the pocono mountains. in lasansky, d. m. & mclaren, b. (eds.), architecture and tourism: perception, performance and place. oxford, england & new york: berg. rendell, j. (2013). a way with words: feminists writing architectural design research. in m. fraser (ed.), design research in architecture: an overview. surrey, uk: ashgate publishing. tourism new zealand (2019). 100% pure new zealand. retrieved from, https://www. tourismnewzealand.com/about/ what-we-do/campaign-andactivity/. tzanelli, r. (2004). constructing the ‘cinematic tourist’: the ‘sign industry’ of the lord of the rings. tourist studies, 4(1), 21-42. urry, j. (1992). the tourist gaze ‘revisited’. american behavioral scientist, 36(2), 172-186. lamella: a spacing of skin and distant boundaries sarah treadwell recent works by barbara tuck, a series entitled lame/la, consist of groups of nine elliptical skins of painted aluminium. each lamella, the parts and the whole, is desirable, difficult and excessive; arousing the passions of the collector and refusing attributes of value. no frames to set apart or emphasise and no secret fixings to mark the artist as magician; the lamella barely adhere to the wall surface. they seem marginally located in art categories although participating, somewhat uneasily, in the conventions of the field; they are to be attached to walls in varying arrangements of the nine parts and can be described as oil paintings though on aluminium not canvas. the lame/la, membranes or gills, refer to the morphological not only through their naming, spreading out beyond the boundaries of the discipline that attempts to house them. a calligraphic surface passes across the constrained shapes of the elliptical lamella. the ovals 159 lame ila suggesting an imperfect origin, egg or womb, a distorted circle or stretched sphere straining the credibility of an originary i (the gestures of authorship are repressed and suggested in these works); a straining of an eye which locates a body in relationship to a surface gaze. the lamella consists of unstable imperfections, ellipses which only the positioning of the body in space utilizing the laws of perspective can restore to the perfection of the circle (here the physical corrects or creates the ideal instead of the usual perfection of theory). the observer, a material body in space, can create the platonic satisfaction of a circle but only fleetingly and at the expense of giddiness and disorientation utterly aware of the separation between mind and body. the geometries of the lamella, the repeated ellipses, and the regular patternings that they seem to resist, invite a biological reference. an egg contains a germ of future life but in the lamella it is not a pristine new beginning nor a unique mark but rather an inevitable re-run of information contained in patterns that imprint the egg. potential new beginnings are smothered in over-arching decorative patterns. between the shape and the surface of the lamella is a plane of slippage; a lack of conjunction between skin and body. ornamental narratives flow over individual lamella; the lamellae themselves create a field within which the individual is both marked and lost. registered in ellipsis is an absence, "the omission of one or more words in a sentence, which would be needed to express the sense completely ... " ; 1 the works remain open in meaning and spatial configuration. in lamella no vii the nine pieces that make up the work are all different and separate but with internal references. two milky egg shell blue lamellae, with a surface calligraphy that scrapes through to the tissue/ flesh beneath, like twins, set up possibilities of pairing. but one is a pale reflection of the other; the body beneath the skin less bloody. a ghost constructed in a different focus, in a different layer, straining the eyes of the viewer, warping the surface of the wall to which they lightly adhere . in lamella no vii the pairing off continues; the 160 sarah treadwell sameness of two brick ochre dusty lamellae qualified by a difference that destabilizes the structure of the whole. thus the control and clarity of the surface marks disintegrates the pairings; the surface skin is rumpled by a calligraphy cutting through to differing layers of chalky bone. this is not "the nihilistic gesture of attempting to counter totality with the assertion of unmediated singularity or individuality" but rather " ... [a] dwell[ing] on the possibility of thinking unity or totality beyond the determination of synthesis and therefore beyond a projected or posited essence and thus in terms of the possibility of unity /totality being the belonging together of the different; a fundamental and constitutive part of which will be distance." 2 in the pairings and groupings within the lamella familial connections and failures of connection are constructed. the distance between parts created by a shifting surface focus, contrasting tonal shifts and foreign hues . there is also, over-riding the internal arrangements, a stream of words, a babble of signs that momentarily adhere to the surface of the lamella but seem to refer to another level of discourse. a distant other level beyond the particular individual case of ellipse or grouping of ellipses; a realm of writing. the surface calligraphy is a writing that invites interpretation but also suggests the loss of a conscious will to decipher that subsumes meaning into form . the writing of a language that is unknowable, a babble that offers amnesia of form as an escape, into pattern, texture, colour and arrangement, into drawing. but as catherine ingraham points out "writing and drawing are exactly the same from a textuality standpoint. neither are linear structures, neither are representational in the way that they claim."3 the drawings of the writing on the lamella suppress the differences that conventionally structure their separate 'reading' techniques. denial of the hand-writing continues in the making of these paintings, a process that 161 lame ila eschews presence; the signature is buried in the automatic action of the roller that skims the aluminium surface which gives no resistance. the grain of canvas is absent and the working of self into the material of the lamella is reduced. the calligraphic form seems to insist on being read; marks of writing score the surface skin. the lines of writing are interrupted and also continued by the conventional notation of architectural drawing, drawings that defer to materiality while structuring the physical. these partial plans and sections that cause an "interruption of "linear writing by drawing, spatiality, volumetrics, may also be a moment of breach that is inevitably sexual (the imprint of the body or shape on the clean page.)"4 the repetition of representation of the physical indicatesthe convoluted boundary between writing and spatiality; the marks of architectural drawing depending on formal qualities, the enclosing boundary, the turned shoulder. in the lamella surface marks cannot be separated from the body. the body is marked by writing, a double writing that is constructed from the forms of presence. that the works shifts between the surface/skin and the body refusing any simple separation of the two is recognized by the inclusion of lamella no iv in an exhibition surface tension and the description of the works by the the curator; "these artists, then, are no longer charged with stripping away the outer and unnecessary trappings of art to reveal its essence, but rather, they are engaged in a constant play between a surface and that which putatively lies beneath it."5 the "play between" in the case of the lamella seems to be through a negotiation 162 sarah treadwell of boundaries; apparent in the refusal to separate writing and, the marks of materiality, architectural writing. and in the swelling and contracting of the boundaries of the ellipses by the presence of a viewer; distortions of perfection. the boundaries between the enclosures of the ellipses and the fields of surface patterning that flow above them are also problematic as are those that govern the scale of ornamentation in relationship to size. the surface of the lamella seem to endlessly assert and withdraw from the act of enclosure, the formation of boundaries. elbows, small l shape marks, construct corners that jab at the surface of the pieces. the corners, vestiges of contained space, acts of containment that creates an interior and an exterior, are places to dwell and to hold. "the constitution of the house necessitates distance. in addition it demands the experience of that distance. the experience of dwelling is, though in an as yet to be specified way, premised upon the experience of distance."6 the lamella, spaced out across the wall, concerned with relationships of distance and space, marked with gestures of containment written in an architectural language, can be seen to construct relationships of dwelling. the house, dependent on distance to separate floor from floor and room from room, is held together by corners. corners are the outcome of collisions; the meeting of lines of distance and difference that the ellipse and the circle cannot acknowledge. in a circle all becomes one and the ellipse is an uneasy expression of unity but unity nevertheless whereas the corner, the place of disgrace, of secrets and security, is a point of accumulation and weakness where planes joined for strength can be prised apart; the corner is redolent of separation. the incisions of calligraphy separate the surface of paint, splitting it to reveal an inner and create an outer layer. writing, calligraphy cutting into the surface, like tattoo, violates and constructs the surface of skin; the boundary of the body is at risk, an opening or orifice created or revealed. the surface puckered and flaking; magnified, a piece of reptilian skin proffers up a decorative, physical and irritable surface. excesses of colour, over-sized tex163 lame ila ture, an enlargement of matter pushing the limits of reason and the restrained boundaries of taste. excess wells up beneath the surface; like the marks of thumbprints on the body the surface reveals a bruising. a welling up of drops of blood that coagulate and congeal, marks of possession and ownership, a signature. the fluidity of the lamellae is also transgressive of boundaries; drops of gold, blood and tears seep and exude through boundaries passing through a moment of perfection; the parts and the collection in a continuous flow. the surface of the works, a plane of evaluation, is in flux, the layers shifting. like floaters that drift across the retina disturbing vision, the lamella unsettle the "truth" of vision. "since non-meaning falls within the purview of the understanding it does not mark its limit. the limit will not be an absolute but rather exist as a site of tension at which in spite of its being present the understanding can no longer be said to dominate." the lamella is shadowed by itself, an anamorphic version of the sphere, the tracings and displacements of an impossible perfection.7 the construction of the ellipse involves a division, a slicing of the circle, construction of displaced centres, a transferral of measurement leading to a multiplication of circles (displaced progenies in the image of their father). the new figure, the ellipse, is delineated by tracing the boundary that tangentially touches these displaced circles; the ellipse founded on an iteration and alteration of a structuring circle. in the lamella the geometry of the ellipse acknowledges connections to 164 sarah treadwell founding orders but also threatens to expand past its own formation, its expansiveness cannot be contained. in the process of construction, criss-crossing the dissection of a circle, the lamella, germ of the material and maternal, begin to proliferate in a disturbing way. notes: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 shorter oxford dictionary 1973. andrew benjamin, "distancing and spacing," in a. benjamin (ed.), philosophy and architecture (london: academy editions, 1990), p. 7. catherine ingraham, "initial proprieties: architecture and the space of the line," in b. colomina, (ed.) sexuality and space (princeton: princeton architectural press, 1992), p. 258. ibid. christina barton, "at the surface: an introduction," catalogue for exhibition "surface tension" (auckland city gallery, 1992), p . 3. andrew benjamin, op. cit., p. 7. in an interview barbara tuck discussed spheres in their anamorph ic forms as eggs in work by fiero della francesca, pala di brera, milan. 165 in t e r s t ic e s 1 8 94 s u r f a c e / p a t t e r n review / jan smitheram the baroque in architectural culture 1880–1980. edited by andrew leach, john macarthur and maarten delbeke. surrey: ashgate publishing company, 2015. the baroque in architectural culture, 1880–1980 is aimed at exploring two projects, “the intellectual history of modern architecture and the history of architectural historiography.” in doing so, the book “defines a role for the baroque in the history of architectural historiography and in the history of modern architectural culture.” the historical understanding of baroque as a phenomenon of the sixteenth and seventeenth century is acknowledged in the book, but the central focus is on how the baroque has been created in our more recent past. or, more accurately, its focus is to unpack how particular politics of our recent past have shaped how the baroque is understood from the 1880s to the 1980s. the book draws our attention to which stories of our recent past have flourished, and which have fallen by the wayside. thus the book asks the reader to consider how the baroque has been shaped by privileging a particular understanding, author, text, and national location. the strength of the book is its focus on the history of modern architectural culture and its histographical approach. this approach offers us, following gayatri spivak, an “insistence on the politics of the present in the making of the past more precisely still foregrounds the location of the historian or teller of tales” (spivak, 1999: 119). and this book offers a critique of linear ideas of history, but renders it complex and multiple. moreover, it also questions stories that are rendered neutral in the continual circulation of ideas named in relation to the baroque. although this is also the weakness of the book, as it takes on a histographic approach but never considers how history is made in the present directly, instead, it is situated in looking at how the baroque is re-made in our recent past—never joining in with more contemporary debates. the book’s twenty chapters are structured around a loose chronology, as described by the the three editors. the tone of their first chapter is clearly aimed at an academic audience, as evident in the complexity of the argument, sentence structure and terminology. but subsequent chapters seem aimed at a broader audience that might chide the introduction’s complexity and opacity, after which we begin with francesca torello engaging albert ilf ’s writing on the baroque of 1880s vienna. to give an idea of the breadth of the chapters included in this book, we end with gro lauvland’s chapter considering the recurrence of the baroque in the in t e r s t ic e s 1 8 95 review / the baroque in architectural culture 1880–1980 s u r f a c e / p a t t e r n norwegian architect christian norberg-schulz’s writing in the 1970s, in particular, the baroque ideas of constancy and change. the middle chapter by andrew leach on the future of baroque, circa 1945, acts to an extent, but not entirely, as a datum on how the baroque is received. the anthology ends with editors leach and delbeke providing further insights and questions provoked by the book. as one reads the book, one is faced with the ebb and flow of opinion on the baroque: from delight to distaste, from exclusion to source material, and from signaling the new to what we must depart from (see michael hill’s chapter on steinberg). the book questions how the history of the baroque has been construed in our recent past and looks at how it has been edited, whose voices are heard (or not) and how this functions as the grounds for the constant ‘’traffic of ideas’’ between modernism and baroque. francesca torello’s and matthew aitchison’s chapters highlight how favouring of certain voices over others has had an impact on how the baroque has been understood and shaped, and consequently has an impact on how we have come to understand it in more contemporary times. francesca torello’s chapter highlights how the history of the baroque has been edited or controlled for the use of particular ends. she attends to how the germanization of the baroque in weimar, germany, occurred not because it was formal or rational, but because it was expressive and spiritual. a similar concern with national identity and its complex intertwining with the baroque is evident in matthew aitchison’s reading on the effects of pevsner’s shift from leipzig to england. the book demonstrates how careful readings provide us with a richer history, rather than an attempt to reinstate a singular or authoritative understanding of the baroque. chapters which highlight that the baroque is made up of multiple and complex story lines, rather than a singular story, are those by luka skansi, denise r costanzo, maarten delbeke, albert narath and francesca torello. luka skansi’s chapter deals directly with an uncritical collapsing of the present in the past, unpacking the “retrospective projection of modern expectations and tendencies onto the so called baroque” (49). meanwhile, denise r costanzo in “giedion as guide’’ challenges the framing of the baroque as theatrical, deceitful and lacking integrity—via a standard modernist text. similarly, maarten delbeke’s reading of charpentrat allows us to understand the salvaging of the baroque from the avalanche of popularism through a functionalist reading of it. however, a careful reading did not foreclose on chapters that were more propositional, such as albert narath’s insightful article on großstäd and baraockstadt, which unpacks the relationship between architecture and advertising—that enables an expansion on the histographical theme outlined at the start of the book. but at the same time, it is similar to torello’s chapter in demonstrating how the baroque had been reframed within this period—to invoke the new. chapters that stood out were those providing clear insights into the thickening complexity of relations between modernism and the baroque, while at times highlighting caution against periodisation. these were chapters by andrew hopkins, luka skansi and eacaiisa eeva-liisa pelkonen. through a close reading we are also made privy to how subtle shifts, or omissions in knowledge, provide us with different understandings of the baroque, as evident in john macarthur’s chapter. a point articulated clearly by evonne levy, compares riegl with wöllfflin, where the latter’s aristocratic vision of the baroque dominated; wöllfflin continues to in t e r s t ic e s 1 8 96 review / the baroque in architectural culture 1880–1980 s u r f a c e / p a t t e r n dominate as a significant figure in framing the baroque and in writing on perception. while wöllfflin’s linear approach to history has dominated subsequent understandings, the history of the baroque and its relationship with modernism in this book is cast as a series of contested relationships rather than as a process of time imaged in a more linear way. while the book is focused on history in its aim and methods, the chapters which are likely to connect with a broader audience are the ones which induce us to think architecturally, with such a notion explored in roberto dulio’s chapter in this book. here, dulio cites bruno zevi; “the history of architecture as taught by architects is only valid if it manages to extricate itself [from the past] other than the verbal instruments of writing of the history of art through a graphic and three dimensional and operative criticism that induces one to think architecturally” (188). the chapters by silvia micheli, luka skansi, eeva-liisa pelkonen, anthony raynsford and gro lauvland offer the possibility of inducing one to think architecturally. these chapters raise questions, which are relevant to, and help locate, discussions about how one approaches design, rather than just being relevant to historical stories and how history is made—the potential here is to shape how we might look at, for example, how design thinking is made in the present. the book does raise a few questions however. the first was the desire to reinstate sedlmayr to architecture’s history, and to an understanding of the baroque. in chapter 8 a physiognomic analysis was explained in neutral terms by the author as merely sedlmayr’s curiosity of new analytical tools and at an apparent departure from art history. and, this was before you reach the author’s revelation (at the end of the chapter) of sedlmayr’s adherence to nazism. yet, critically, this neutral framing defangs the fact that physiognomic analysis was a tool used by the nazis to situate people of colour and jews between apes and white men as proof of their inferior status: as subhuman (gray, 2004). although the use of physiognomic analysis within architecture predates sedlmayr by some years, its troubled history cannot be ignored. yet, the author of this chapter urges us to question the implicit ban on sedlmayr, which he suggests is not because of his ties with nazism, but as a result of the ambiguity of his research. however, this raises questions as at the time of writing this review, this was the only chapter referenced because it provides support to look to sedlmayr, despite his past. considering the histographical approach of the book one would assume that this would draw attention to how arguments on the baroque are being constructed and remade—and to what ends. to ask what does it mean when an argument is cast as neutral, despite the context, as attempted by some writers on the baroque, and cited in this book to define the baroque as a style and therefore “without ideological or conceptual content”, leaves us with “a tool of dry historiography that cannot be turned to evil ends” (leach, 2016: 126). the conflation of baroque and national identity, which leach speaks to, illustrates the complicities of power with architectural and artistic movements, but it does not follow that notions of the baroque around complexity, ambiguity, senses, and feelings are wrong. but what must be challenged and debated following historiographical approaches is treating history and its methods as neutral and banal: as the book argues at times rather than unpacking the political consequences further of how the baroque has been tied up and utilised to support a particular ideology. in t e r s t ic e s 1 8 97 review / the baroque in architectural culture 1880–1980 s u r f a c e / p a t t e r n the second question explores why the book concludes at the 1980s without going further. the final chapter laments the baroque’s loss of historical position, or even the lack of welcome with which it is greeted within general debates of the discipline. however, are we not in a post-critical period where anything goes, where a range of ideas are welcome? is this not the perfect time for a historiographic insistence on how the politics of the present are refashioning the past? one, therefore, would think a historian’s close reading of the digital use of the baroque would be more than welcome—to develop a clearer understanding of its significance and how it operates in our own time. a further rounding out of the chapters would have been enabled by extending to more contemporary writing that would enable a strengthening of the question—how is the baroque being remade in the present? to conclude, the points raised in this review do not detract from a book which clearly situates the baroque in the history of architectural historiography and in the history of modern architectural culture. this is an elegant book and a welcome addition for scholars of art and architectural history. additionally, the book boasts a wider appeal than those concerned specifically with a historical perspective. references gray, r. (2004). about face: german physiognomic thought from lavater to auschwitz, detroit: wayne state university press. leach, a. (2015). the future of the baroque, c. 1945. in the baroque in architectural culture, 1880–1980. edited by andrew leach, john macarthur and maarten delbeke. surrey: ashgate publishing company. narath, a. (2015). großstäd and baraockstadt: art history, advertising and the surface of the neo-baroque. in the baroque in architectural culture, 1880–1980. edited by andrew leach, john macarthur and maarten delbeke. surrey: ashgate publishing company. spivak, g c. (1999) a critique of postcolonial reason: toward a history of the vanishing present, cambridge, massachusetts: harvard university press. interview with mark wigley and paul walker pw. insofar as you are different from new zealand architecture, or its lack, you apparently offend it. was it necessary for the new zealand condition to provoke an agent which would in turn provoke it? do we need to be offended at the moment? mw. new zealand's lack of architecture is precisely what makes it central to the world thought about architecture. it was also necessary that the complete denial of architecture here would produce some kind of licentious behaviour. pw. i'm suspicious of this. my experience is only new zealand, but i suspect that wherever i was, i might equally discover a unique condition for my region. i would discover the regionalism of my architecture to be unique, to have a unique and privileged role. this is what you seem to say about new zealand architecture or its non architecture. it's a kind of unique keeper of past models, or something. and this seems to me, to be echoed in the 219 mark wigley relationship of architecture to philosophy that you propose or trace: it's a privileged relationship. doesn't this make you suspicious that you're simply privileging wherever it is-new zealand architecture-you find yourself? mw. yes. it is my current description of my work, but one which came after the work, that what i did was to generalise my contempt for new zealand architecture into a contempt for architecture as such, to get over the contempt and admire architecture in the way it covertly resisted certain things. in a way i wrote a personal history bound to a certain location on the earth, bound to certain qualities of my education, and so on, that precisely calls into question notions of place, location, and all that. it would be nonsense to claim that my description of the relationship between architecture and philosophy was not influenced by the fact that i was largely outside the architectural world by virtue of being in new zealand. i think it would be nonsense to say that i wasn't effected by the fact that i wasn't in the united states when i wrote m y thesis. pw. would there be any discipline in new zealand that would not feel itself in such a provincial position? mw. probably not. i think that all provincials are obsessed with their provincial status. those who think that they are not in the provinces are also obsessed with their belief that they have got away from provincialism; they too exhibit all of the symptoms. to argue about the provinces is to argue about the relationship between the centre and the margins, or the inside of an architectural game, for example, and the outside . everybody is trapped. we are all obsessed with provincialism, and we all start our argument from wherever we are told we are placed in this game. in new zealand we are told, and tell ourselves, that we are outside. so that is where i started from; then i attempted to argue that the kind of things we 220 paul walker deviously protect here are inside the world, at the centre; and then i came across a series of texts which made talking about that interesting. equally, the people who are on the inside take things like deconstruction in a way coloured by their thoughts that they are first, that they started at the beginning, that they are at the centre. i am saying that because i began thinking, as a provincial, that this angled the work i did and dictated its character, but i end up alongside the position of people who started off believing that they were at the centre. precisely by following up those respective positions thoroughly one ends up calling into question the inside/ outside relationship, and therefore calling into question one's own provincial status, and in a certain sense rejecting it. pw. there are different kinds of provincial status? mw. yes. i think the different provinces have a different sense. australia has a different sense of its relationship to the inside. the people in new york who abhor provincials are extraordinarily prov incial in their attitude. the force with which new yorkers limit themselves to manhattan is, in some way, much more oppressively provincial that the way in which we just say that it is obvious we are isolated-here are billions and billions of gallons of water cutting u s off. over there they work very hard and point to maybe a hundred yards of water, attempt to demonstrate that a hundred yards marks the beginning and end of thought, and entertainment, and theatre and so on. pw. is there anyone who isn't bound to be provincial? mw. no. in my view the belief that you are not provincial is the belief that you are god. the full force of western philosophy is b ased on the premise that one day we will get to the centre, that the centre is definitely the place to go . that is the imperative under which we all operate. so while i cite my provincial status as being extremely important in the construction of my arguments, at the same time, having completed those arguments, i then gener221 mark wigley alise and proclaim that to be the condition of all rigorous inquiry into architecture. pw. it seems to me that in your thesis you say architecture has a kind of provinciality with respect to philosophy, which makes the relationship between them special. but couldn't one equally write a thesis called 'jacques derrida and law: the deconstructive possibilities of judicial discourse,' that would equally claim such a relationship for the law? mw. yes. there is a book by gillian rose called dialectic of nihilism1 which proclaims that derrida is somewhat uninteresting because, at his most interesting, what he says is actually already written into the legal tradition. but the argument has a different quality. pw. i am asking if you can entertain the possibility that something other than architecture can claim an equally privileged relationship with philosophy. mw. yes, but we necessarily proclaim our own area to have such privilege . the particular privilege that i would ascribe to architecture would be different to that ascribed to other fields . pw. obviously you would have to u se different philosophical writings in the construction of the argument. mw. but i think it would have a different structural relationship. pw. am i right in saying that architecture is privileged in philosophy b ecause it has acted as a powerful metaphor? mw. i would rather say its privileged status comes from appearing to be a metaphor but turning out to be much more than that. my argument would be that the privilege architecture has is that unlike other metaphors employed by philosophy this one can't be rejected as a metaphor, can't be abandoned easily. philosophy regards metaphor as being precisely 222 paul walker that which can be abandoned, but which is supplemental, illustration. but the concept of metaphor is itself dependent on an architectural argument. therefore the architectural metaphor cannot be abandoned. one cannot abandon the thing with which one constructs the idea of metaphor so simply. but, undoubtedly, at the same time that which i am calling architecture is not something which is isolated from that thing which you called law. so i would dip into legal texts and argue that they were architectural texts in disguise, and a legal theorist might read architectural texts as somewhat blurred versions of legal texts. i think other disciplines could not make the same first moves as we can with architecture, but the endpoint of these sorts of arguments is much the same; after some time the legal arguments and the architectural arguments could not be simply separated. pw. it seems to me that you might not be able to make the same moves in law but you might still presume your moves were the privileged ones. do law and philosophy have the same relationship between them as architecture and philosophy? mw. while both disciplines can thoroughly demonstrate a privileged relationship, traditionally law is seen to be worthier of that privilege in that philosophers have dealt with the question of law more extensively. i suppose the interesting question would be things like painting, to compare painting and architecture, whether painting could assume the same status. except painting never existed as a discipline. pw. i'm not sure architecture has either. i accept arguments about architecture that suggest that it is really only constituted as a discipline in the renaissance or the 18th century. mw. yes. pw. i wouldn't see architecture just as being discourse on building for instance. i would 223 mark wigley want to argue that architecture is a discourse on building that is structured in a certain way and that this structuring doesn't happen until quite late. that would make any kind of allusion to architecture in plato's text, say, something difficult. i don't think that to discover reference to building is enough. mw. my view is that those references to building were discovered in the renaissance. to put it in a slightly different way: hidden bonuses in the contract between architecture and philosophy were discovered in the renaissance. in a way the contract only became a contract at that point. in the renaissance, certain conditions laid down within the [philosophical] text were exploited by a group of people to produce a discipline. they became constructural conditions. i'm interested in following this history of the idea of the contract, and relating that to the history of the idea of architecture. pw. this brings me to my last question, which is about the relationship of building and architecture. for me this has become an obsession since working in an architectural practice, and one noted for the strongly tectonic qualities of its work. however, i feel remote from building. my experience is that the obligations placed upon me in my work situation seem quite self-contained and removed from any ultimate obligation to building. this may be false. maybe the workplace is cleverly contrived. would you sustain a definition of architecture as discourse about building? mw. it's a particular kind of discourse about building. in any view it's a discourse that attempts to disguise the horror of building; it attempts to keep the nature of building unobserved, to construct a shield around building. architecture is a kind of collective discourse on the nature of building, but it is a discourse which is desperately concerned not to interrogate building too closely. so it has concentrated on considerations of ornament, for example, which lead us to believe that building is non-problematical. in a sense, it's an attempt to keep us to one side of building. the concern of the architectural discipline is to reaffirm 224 paul walker the insight on which philosophy depends; that building is non-problematical, and by definition virtuous and uplifting, in the sense of lifting something up, erecting it on sound foundations, and so on, and that by these gestures it is necessarily moral. in a sense, culture is then defined by its ability to build. my particular interest is in articulating the horror of building itself. to return to eisenman, his recent work is more challenging than the earlier work because it occupies building. and this is precisely why he has no disciples in architecture; it's impossible for eisenman to have architectural disciples because all architects refuse to stage an in-depth encounter with building itself. rather, they act around building in a certain way to claim that territory and prohibit others from occupying it. i think the only interesting work in architecture today is that which inhabits the realm of building. to get access to that realm the traditional relationships between structure and ornament and between building and architecture have to be skilfully undermined, against the full force of the discipline. that kind of undermining is what i'm most interested in. eisenman is its only successful exponent. so he is correctly seen as dangerous; he is undermining not just the foundations of our discipline, but also the assumptions on which we base our ideas about everything that we have. pw. by whom is he seen as dangerous? mw. by architects. this is complicated. you can argue that up until two or three years ago he was seen as superficially dangerous-he was assigned the role of being the dangerous fringe of architectural inquiry, and it was felt he would soak up all that energy and allow the rest of the profession to get on with the business of doing architecture. eisenman was appropriated by 225 mark wigley the discipline as a demonstration that it was actually worried about its own condition, inquiring into it. but that has changed and now he is seen as truly dangerous. he can no longer be simply dismissed because he has now moved his projects into the heart of building. he's involved in the construction of major projects. and he's maintained the same conceptual rigour that he demonstrated earlier. i'm waiting to see what the next project will be, and the one after that, because a very incisive inquiry has begun and it could have very significant results. at the same time quite a few of eisenman's generation are sceptical about the condition of their own work. pw. what kind of work-mainstream, postmodernism? mw. absolutely. pw. i suppose my view is that the architectural mainstream will contain eisenman as english departments contain derrida, reduce the work to a set of motifs with which they can replace other motifs. but business will go on as usual. mw. i wouldn't promote his work as a new wave; i think it will always remain without followers. pw. building must be a difficult location for dissent or inquiry or criticism because it costs money, you've got to get someone to pay for it, to get someone else involved in the act. or you work covertly. other disciplines perhaps do not face such severe stringencies. mw. i agree. but that is also an assertion of architecture's privilege. i would tend to invoke rather than the financial costs and so on, the philosophical weight of what's being tampered with. but what our culture values philosophically it also values financially. is it any surprise that it's hard to find support for a project which questions the nature of support? obviously 226 paul walker one can only do that in a slippery way. that is the problem, if you want to undermine building. there's a limit to how surreptitious you can be. so-called deconstructionists who happily pull apart texts are immediately horrified at the thought that the room in which they are doing that might have some of the gaps in it revealed. everyone is aware of the influence of building. notes: 1 g. rose, dialectic of nihilism: poststructuralism and law (oxford, basil blackwell, 1984). 227 installation of the auckland school at the fifth architectural biennale, venice. (photo. chris adams.) the venice prize, a competition for schools of architecture, was mounted for the first time at the fifth architectural biennale in venice. a prize was awarded for the best installation showing current architectural research directions. forty-three schools from around the world were invited to prepare exhibitions. exhibiting schools were selected not only for cultural diversity, but also for the different social and historical conditions in which their students are educated for the profession. the director of the biennale, francesco dal co, wanted to offer an initiative to students and teach ers from centres of international debate with established lines of communication, and also to those of us from the margins who had never had such an opportunity to participate. a prestigious jury comprising ignazio gardella, hans hollein, arata isozaki, richard meier and franco purini unanimously awarded the prize to the university of auckland department of architecture. 189 the venice prize architecture to a fault. la biennale di venezia 1991 settore architettura "venice prize" the department of architecture, university of auckland, new zealand design project model, the architecture of exile-belinda ellis. (photo . lynn logan.) fault, faltering, faulting is a critical theme in this selection of recent work from the auckland school. the work was selected to show what can happen to architecture that has been authorised by an 'archaeology of theory' when the ground itself, the land, culture, and civilisation is discovered to be shattered, shaken, faulted. theories of design in this school as elsewhere had been founded on totalising phenomenologies of space, land-form, region, back-ground, etc., where these contexts were assumed to be a pure, unsullied land. the original and continuing violence within and beneath the landscape was either denied, re190 university of a uckland design project model, "nimesis"fraser cameron. (photo . lynn logan.) sisted, ignored or reduced to the picturesque. critical archaeology discloses a glaring fault in former theories of paradise. here we speak with architecture as with prophecy. the culture itself is at fault, a bi-culture-europe and polynesia, empire and its othe -not simply and merely divided, but an intimate and deep-founded grindingtogether of peoples, an architectonic fault-line of pressures and upheavals, a seismic folding of languages, forged in the intense heat of fault. when empire reached this strip of land at the southern end of the world, a torn straggle of islands on the edge of the pacific plate, a crumpled strip of white fish-flesh torn from the realm of the sea, he faltered in the course of conquest. 'man alone' hesitated . he revealed uncertainty in his progress. he felt exposed on the indefinite edge of the face of empire, unsure how to proceed beyond the horizon of the subject. like kokoschka's everyman, swallowed in emptiness, he felt compelled to invent his idea of society. he faltered upon the question, "what architecture is?" civilisation arrives here as representations of the centre. a local reading of theory simulates but always distorts the original. (another reading of semiotics, another version of deconstruction.) the slippage between the original and the copy produces an uncanny quality 'almost the same but different,' that is often noted. this difference again, this misrepresentation of the architecture of civilisation is 'our fault .' the nineteenth century beginnings 191 venice biennale winners (from left) andrew barrie, helene furjan, glenn watt, mary jowett, richard mcgowan, chris adams, stephen auld. the venice prize were themselves representations-of nature, history, the primitive hut, the subj ect. at every turn we are caught between strata of (mis)-representation. at first, with a colonial perception of wilderness, remoteness and natural wealth, imperial architecture tried to produce a faultless culturation, not to expose too much the shabby workings of conquest and exploitation, but to imitate the european picturesque in the farmstead and the city. later, particularly in the post-war period, this imitative tradition faltered before its own image of 'tabula rasa.' architecture developed a passion to re-work the blank slate of the house, to re-invent the farm shed, to discover a regional identity which could b e 'without fault.' auckland architecture was a paradigm of the modern, utopia in its place, on the edge of the empire of ideas. but still it faltered. th e modernist clean slate cannot itself be simply effaced nor by-passed, but rather it must be interrogated. the lyotardian project of 'elab oration of the initial oblivion' would mean here a 'working through' of the historical processes which led to the cleaning of the slate, allowing the repressed material to show through, archaeologically cutting through its bland surface. the aesthetic research direction which is illustrated in this selection of recent design work has little to do with a critical regionalism or with the empire of the picturesque. the work has been likened to a cloud, the 'long white cloud' of mythic arrival, or the uncanny ephemeral cloud in which damisch found fault with the body-centred perspective. it is a tenuous university of auckland an early model study. (photo. lynn logan.) ethereal thing, like the tattered white ghost of a cloak, a 'white mythology' drawn across the surface of building, the silent cloud of unknowing, which averts its face from the fault as it floats gracefully over the shaky surface of the ground. the work displays little fascination for technology, the final stitching together of a coherent aesthetic for how can you stitch a cloud? it would be a mistake to describe this work as superficial. it is not clever, tongue-in-cheek, street smart. it is often derivative, unashamedly so, quick to acknowledge its sources. it does not waver any more at mere imitation. but if it is like waves, there is also an undertow. if it is clouds, we also smell the heat of thunder. we detect a deep-grinding energy which causes the paper to crease and smudges the line. this architecture 'to a fault' embraces the fault itself into the body of its own text. we notice a fault in all this work, that it is introverted. there is no context, no urban fabric, no geological ground, no horizon. or is the ground itself, faulted, corrupted and imperfect, drawn into the text itself? we have not yet found an answer for this question. this is 193 the venice prize architecture 'to a fault,' faltering, opening itself to fault. as it opens n ew ground for new zealand architecture, we are also made aware that there are not the means at hand (traditional, theoretical, metaphorical or even mythical) with which to amend the fault which architecture exposes. michael linzey photo. chris adams. university of auckland crossed lines: drawing threads from the 1991 venice prize design project for a navigation school-fraser cameron (photo. lynn logan) the winged sculpture by massimo scolari marked the entrance to the corderie dell' arsenale which housed the student exhibition. it both made and marked an arrival, a wooden and steel glider, crashed but intact, settled on a ruined wall. the installation awarded the 'venice prize', by the school of architecture at auckland university, was a collection of drawings and models linked both literally and figuratively with a construction of wood and paper. this delicate 'object' was somewhere between a kite-like full-scale model and a complicated wall fragment of uncertain origin. hovering between definitions, this object resisted definition, resisted being placed, and indeed resisted settling 195 the venice prize in this place: hovering, barely connected to the floor by tenon pins. these objects figure the beginning of icarus's flight: that heady desire to rise above all constraints, " to fly above our corporality with fantasy ." 1 but scolari's glider also reminds us of the failure of that desire, "impossible constructions" for an "inhuman aspiration." 2 his landing, like icarus's, brings us firmly back to earth, weighting the flight of fantasy with the gravity of the real, "that primordial aspiration to the lightness that our freedom has not been able to concede to u s."3 the world-wise wooden ruin is pinned to the earth, heavy in the knowledge of its own limits. the auckland student installation was composed from a working drawing laid out on the floor which was connected by the extension of a set of co-ordinate cross-axes that literally crossed the drawing (an arbitrary marker of centre-lines designated by the maximum length of cargo on a jet plane to venice, a literal cross-section), to both this object, and to the exhibition of works (drawings and models), organising their display. the object was con196 jeremy leman, "house for freud's dora" (reinterpreta tion of the auckland pioneer women's memorial hall.) (photo. lynn logan.) university of auckland structed from two sets of light, prefabricated framing (the 'one' based on local domestic vernacular, defined by the nz standard 3604 code of practice for light timber frame buildings; the 'other' based on a micronesian navigation map, figure for an-other architecture), crossed through each other, severed at the cross-axes, marked with crosses at their truncated ends (with lead inserts that 'traced' its origins in drawing) and finally covered in tissue paper crossed with a 500mm grid. if, as a fragment, the framed construction of the auckland school bears witness also to the descent of that tragic flight, it is as yet unaware of defeat. it presents the young face of the school, naively eager, like a kite straining at its ties, resisting the gravity of the limits that bind it. and yet it is aware of these limits: the construction is indeed 'framed', caught in the play of representations that is architecture in this place. representing the condition of a school of architecture, it is confined always to the 'drawn'. drawn on the floor and papered, its status hovers between construction and drawing, resisting presence in the act of presenting itself. at the limits of both, it exists as barely anything more than a "a strange light", an inner glow that "reveals the unconditional within its own limits; the light of the invisible within the visible."4 it is the 'strange light' of the ephemeral gaze of the angel, the modern angel of klee's angelus novus. scolari's glider, too, is such an angel. together, they watched over the thresholds of architecture-the place of the schools in the biennale. but unlike klee's angel which, for walter benjamin, is driven backwards over the wreckage of the past, towards the future, by the storm of progress, these angels are static: "the air seems not to breathe and everything is arrested for an immobile instant."5 and in this stillness these objects are figured as enigmas: the glider amongst its ruins, the framed wall fragment, ancient cloak, or kite; both are at once so heavy that they would sink into the surface, speaking of "the weight of the wall, the construction of the architecture;"6 197 the venice prize and so weightless that they could "at a certain point become as light as a cloud and vanish"7 , speaking of "the aireal lightness of the flight" 8• it is an enigma that sees these objects unable to be pinned to a stable meaning, unable to be grounded, just as the framed 'object' resists the pins that would tie it to the floor. the installation treads the fine line between an archaeological fragment and a tourist trophy, a souvenir of a 'south seas paradise' and the myths of its country. the white cloud of aotearoa is at the same time the pure white of a white mythology: the blinding glare of the tabula rasa, the clean screen, of orderly, white tissue cladding signifying the unrepresentable, blank landscape that, like c.d. freidrich's painting, wayfarer above a sea of cloud, attests to the colonial desire to 'discover' that there is nothing (already) here. but this ideal, this 'clouded' view that would conceal an existing architecture in a sea of mist, itself already resists the colonial gaze that constructs it: a cloud cannot be re-presented, it resists the perspectival projection that defines and records the gaze, and thereby renders impotent the claim that centres this gaze, as the averted face of freidrich's wanderer also testifies. writes franco rella of both freidrich and scolari's paintings: a strange world is this, in which nothing is diminished by perspective; a world in which objects lie parallel, equidistant from each other; so to speak, in an unterminated space-rendered infinite by its own confines.9 where the tissue screen blurs the two framing systems into a shadowy, indistinguishable synthesis (the colonial enterprise that sees its other(s) assimilatedconsumed and concealed), the surface is no longer the clean white of colonial tabula rasa but is etched by the marks and traces of a repressed architecture. it is a move that 'unveils', not so much in order to reveal what it hides, as to lay bear the fabric of the veil, to locate within it the working-over that sees its other(s) assimilated, consumed and concealed, that renders the 'bi-' of bi-culture as rend, a double cut, that allowed within the white mythology the possibility of cross-section, 198 university of auckland of interstitial details, fleeting glimpses that resist a totalising view, a mastering gaze, hints at a crossing or weaving of figures of culture that move past and through each other, like the faulted landscape, shaking each other to the foundations, and contaminating each in a sliding trajectory. here, if it is the edge that speaks, it is an edge that, paradoxically, speaks with the authority of an empty centre: an edge too anxious, too edgy, to speak of itself. an edged figure from the edge of the world, it hedges the edge of its site. "like an intact catastrophe that redeems the accident beyond common sense" 10, it speaks of the enigma of the threshold, of the limit. notes: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 helene furjan massimo scolari, 'l'ingresso alle corderie dell' arsenale', in the catalogue to quinta mostra internazionale di architettura, (milan, electa, 1991), p. 40. ibid. ibid. franco rella, 'the gaze of the argonaut', in hypnos, massimo scolari, p. 18. ibid., p . 12. scolari, op. cit. rella, op . cit., p. 10. 199 the venice prize 8 scolari, op. cit. 9 rella, op. cit., p. 14. 10 scolari, op. cit. 200 university of auckland a detail of the auckland university installation under construction. (photo. chris adams.) 201 202 winged entranceway to the architectural exhibitionm. scolari. (photo. chris adams.) • 46 fig 1 (top left) syntax, sakyo-ku, kyoto, 1990 (photo: tom daniell) fig 2 (top right) kirin plaza, osaka, 1987 (photo: tom daniell) fig 3 (bottom) crystal monolith, yokohama, 1992 (computer graphics: courtesy ofakihiko endo, shin takamatsu architect & associates) interview with shin takamatsu and tom daniell ornament and (anti)urbanism td your architecture is uncompromisingly individualistic and without apparent precedent. it has been characterised as a response to the overpowering and chaotic nature of the contemporary japanese city. this is certainly true of a building like kirin plaza osaka, located in the shinsaibashi district of osaka, one of the most intense urban environments in all of japan. kirin seems excessive in photographs, but in reality it is silent and serene: the eye of the storm. there, it is a perfect response. however, it seems ironic that the majority of your built work to date is located here in kyoto. this is a very traditional city, in both architecture and custom. how do you regard context in your work? st there are two ways to deal with context. one is to harmonise as much as possible, to work with utmost sympathy for history, tradition and the aesthetics of the surrounding buildings. by way of analogy, imagine the city to be a length of obi.1 if you wish to add to or repair the obi, you could weave a new pattern into it using a very similar thread and stitch. this would then become indistinguishable from what was existing. the second method would be to inlay a brilliant and complex knot of gold thread into the obi, to transform it. this is my method . kyoto has a profound tranquillity which rapidly assimilates all new intrusions. it is a form of stagnation. the context here is something that must be played with, challenged, fought and transfigured. in creating a new building, it is necessary to also create a new place, to redefine the surroundings. as long as the making of a building is intended to add value to the city, architecture and urbanism cannot be separated. when i make a building, i am always considering both the immediate context and the deep structure of the city. td kyoto is becoming increasingly modernized; tradition is fading. you have said kyoto is dying. st entropy increases. all cities must die, and it is exciting to be present at their death. what is important is how a city dies. unfortunately, kyoto is dying very badly. on the other hand, vienna is dying well. the viennese show wisdom in dealing with their city. kyoto needs such wisdom right now. td wisdom in what way? st we must take account of that which makes a city unique. one thing vital to kyoto is shakkei.2 shakkei enhances and invigorates every space in the city, and allows spectacles such as the diamon-ji.3 as long as kyoto does not lose its shakkei, it will die well. unfortunately, projects such as the kyoto tower hotel and the new kyoto jr station were designed without thought for this, without an understanding of kyoto. if the city was analyzed more intelligently, better architecture would result, and kyoto would die with dignity. td many of your commissions have been from developers and other commercial clients, yet these buildings have very powerful, almost religious, qualities, far in excess of the average tenant building. you once said, in reference to the links building, "to me, a commercial building is like a temple ... commercial space, in an extreme sense, is a space to sublimate and to rescue us from all our wants and cravings." 4 are such buildings intended to ritualise consumerism? do you believe contemporary society has substituted materialism for religion? st no. materialism will not bring us closer to the infinite. however, commercial space requires intense realization. if we use language as an analogy, a word does not exist in isolation. the word becomes a sentence, a page, an idiom of its own. if you read a book mishima perhaps, or pynchon you gain far more than just a collection of words. the words attain a certain synergy. it is the same with architecture. a commercial building must be more than functional. it must be architecture. in the case of links, that is a building which is intended to be seen from a distant place. a person seeing links has a glimpse of a different world, a different definition of their world. each viewer 47 • fig 4 (top left) "the garden of abstract fo1ms" kunibiki messe, matsue, shimane-ken, 1993 (courtesy of nae sa & partners) fig 5 (top right) okamura research centre, yokohama, 1992 (computer graphics: courtesy of akihiko endo, shin takamatsu architect & associates) fig 6 (bottom) kunibiki messe, matsue , shimane-ken, 1993 (courtesy of nae sa & partners) creates their own definition. i want to create an architecture that enriches and transfigures its surroundings. if architecture is a language, then links is not only a means of communication, but a totally new word in the mind of the perceiver. td and the function of consumerism is then irrelevant? st if we are to believe hegel, architecture is building without function. td i am interested in the paradigm shift regarding technology that has occurred in your work in recent years. this is perhaps exemplified by the differences between the syntax building in kyoto and the crystal monolith project for yokohama. syntax is a concrete fortress ornamentedwith mechanistic details; crystal monolith is a floating glass box, its form defined by the lcd video screens on its surface. the references here are to information technology, electronics rather than mechanics. st there is indeed a paradigm shift between these projects. architecture is always changing, and technological developments will guide these changes. crystal monolith is a field of serial simulations, manifested as a simple glass box. electronic and media technology provide an appropriate metaphor for architecture in the public domain. technology, the machine, is a means by which architecture may be transformed. td why the machine? st the machine has two important aspects. firstly, the machine is a sign, that is, a visual message. secondly, it is a metaphor: it has an invisible function. the machine desires something. it desires transcendence, and this secret function is more important than its appearance. a machine expresses both functional efficiency and the invisible dynamic forces that act within it. my machines are pure energy. they provoke and transform their context. td the mechanistic detailing of your early work was generally unrelated to function, yet in crystal monolith the ornament has apparently become inseparable from the structure. similarly, in kunibiki messe and the okamura research centre, you are dealing with forms that seem to be simultaneously undecorated yet entirely decorative in and of themselves. the distinction between essential and auxiliary, between the ornament and the ornamented, is no longer clear in any conventional sense. st such a distinction has never existed in my work. throughout history, ornament has been seen as something added, a question of rationality and efficiency versus beauty and grandeur. i am interested in something in between, beyond questions of utility and decoration. i compose architecture. it is all essential. td it is hegel who suggests architecture is at its most powerful when it is most concerned with appearance, with pure symbolic power. perhaps kirin plaza is a good example. the light towers are ornamental, yet completely integral to the architecture. st yes. kirin plaza is a monument without physical form. you have seen kirin plaza by night: the building dissolves into darkness, and the floating towers remain. it is architecture composed of light. td i have noticed connections between your recent work and certain aspects of traditional japanese architecture. the early buildings were dense, formally-complete monuments, yet your current work has become more sequential and episodic, freer in its composition. this interest in the timeoriented, experiential possibilities of architecture has obvious links with spaces such as katsura riky or ry anji stone garden. st two major factors led to these changes. the first is the issue of scale. the early buildings were very small, and hence designed to be instantly comprehended by those who see them. i wanted people to feel their power and strength in the first glance, to experience a moment of ecstasy when 49 • fig 7 (top) a stone garden designed in the karesansui (waterless stream) style circa 15th century, ry an-ji temple, kyoto (photo: tom daniell) fig 8 (bottom)kyoto concert hall, 1991 (courtesy of shin takamatsu architect & associates) j they encounter these buildings. however, as i started working at a much larger scale, i had to allow for the time it takes to comprehend vast forms and spaces. such buildings require the accumulated understanding of their many aspects. i began to question the possibilities of large scale, to experiment with what i might achieve during the time it takes to perceive these buildings. the second reason is that many of my commissions are now for public buildings rather than tenant buildings, and there is a huge difference in the design process. the programmes for public buildings are complex and varied. tenant buildings simply require neutral, open space. on the other hand, specific functional requirements become very important for public projects. the complexities of the brief guide the design process. td so form follows function? st in a sense. while designing kunibiki messe, i was focusing on the programme very intensely. the building required a tight hierarchical system. we may design with diagrams showing different programmatic functions connected by line segments. this can then be translated into an arrangement of spaces. i struggled for a long time with this approach, and the results were unsatisfactory. i then shifted my attention from the functions to the line segments themselves.these tend to be all but ignored, and resolved into corridors and alleyways of no architectural power. i wanted to create a new type of line between elements, a new method of division and connection. i intended to create a building in flux, in a fluid equilibrium. i don't mean this as a banal deconstructivist aesthetic, but in an experiential sense. rather than connecting the elements with lines, i allowed the elements to be swallowed up by the lines. at ground level in kunibiki messe, there is a 90-metre long processional space. in the taller section of the building, there is a 24-metre high glazed volume containing a number of floating elements, each with a different function: the "garden of abstract forms." there is a similar play of elements within transparent voids in the okamura research centre and ykk okayama projects. from the original planning diagrams, line segments without dimension became these enormous spaces. the elements themselves are held in a delicate balance. if you imagine a bowl of water with several apples floating in it, over time the apples will find a stable equilibrium in relation to each other. or if you look at the kanji character kokoru, the location of the fourth and final stroke is not fixed, but is contained within a zone defined by the preceding three. the design process for these buildings involves a rigorous examination of the programme, followed by an analysis of time in the abstract. it is each particular system which provides the solution, through rigid adherence to every aspect of the system rather than by capricious transgressions of its rules. a system is always impoverished, but it is a poverty that guarantees richness. the solutions lie within this poverty. the purer the system, the greater the possibilities for discovery. i am aware that my work right now is moving closer to aspects of traditional japanese architecture. there is a similar equilibrium involved. for example, at ry an-ji, if one stone is moved, or a stone is added, that space is significantly altered. japanese space is always balanced on the edge of change. the system may be relatively flexible, but altering a single element can radically affect the entire structure. td if these recent projects are related to the minimalist zen space of ry an-ji, are buildings such as kirin plaza and syntax related to the ornate and hermetic shinto shrines, for example t sh g gate at nikk? st yes. td your buildings have always floated. the recessed podiums and top-heavy compositions of the early buildings create the illusion of weightlessness. st i am trying to set architecture free . architecture is constrained by so many things: function, 51 • • 52 budget, building codes, systems, institutions, society, daily life, common sense. but above all, it is constrained by gravity. it is very difficult to free architecture from any of those things, although historically it has perhaps been attempted through religion or technology. to actually free architecture from gravity itself is, of course, totally impossible, so i try to achieve this freedom metaphorically rather than physically. in other words, i want an architecture that playss with gravity. my architecture expresses the hope of one day escaping from gravity. in the early buildings, i wished to suggest a kind of instability, through their heavy appearance and tenuous connections with the ground. although those buildings wish to float free, they barely levitate. td your work is beginning to achieve that freedom, in projects such as kunibiki messe. st perhaps. those projects are tentative experiments. to simply resist gravity is no longer sufficient; i must escape gravity altogether. td your architecture has always been explicit about its own artificiality, its unequivocal separation from the natural world. recently, however, i have noticed that the boundaries between architecture and environment are becoming ambiguous. why the shift from darkness to light, from enclosure to openness, from pure artifice to the inclusion of nature? st i have become interested in blurring the division between a building and its surroundings. this is related to the shift to public projects. for public buildings, you must examine their relationship with the city very carefully. of course, you must deal with the facade, the structure, the space, but you must also deal with the transition between the surroundings and the building interior in a new way. for example, in my design for the kyoto concert hall, the building changes over time6. it is a flexible7 system which interacts with its environment. one section is clad in a three-layer "breathing membrane." on the outer perimeter there is a glass boundary wall, which absorbs the landscape. the glass wall is required for the functioning of the building, although i would rather have nothing at all, no separation between inside and outside. behind the glass is a layer of infrared-reflective polycarbonate. behind this is a system of computer-controlled timber louvres. these louvres filter interior and exterior space, and allow glimpses of the activities within. thus, the building breathes light. ultimately, it will breathe in the history of kyoto. fig 9 (above) katsura riky, the former imperial villa, kyoto , circa 17th century (photo: tom daniell) i wish to alter the relationship between the interior and the exterior in architecture. i wish to mingle these two conditions, to layer space. td japanese architecture has always layered space as you describe. st of course. the traditional kyoto townhouse is separated from its surroundings by membranes and lattices, by shoji8 screens, marsh-reed blinds and bamboo shutters. the kyoto concert hall project achieves this layering by means of high technology. i am now searching for new types of spatial relationships, an open and ambiguous architecture. this is the ambition of the series of projects beginning with kunibiki messe. as i deal with public buildings, i wish to redefine the public domain. i am trying to eliminate boundaries. june 1993, kyoto, japan. translation: hiroshi watanabe (japan) and hideaki inoue (new zealand) lthe traditional kimono sash, made from hand-woven silk. 2"borrowed scenery," the inclusion of distant views as background in the design of a building or garden. kyoto is located in a basin, and is surrounded by bush-clad mountains. while the middle distance is ignored, the mountains are acknowledged and included in the composition. 3 an annual festival in which bonfires are lit on seven mountainsides around downtown kyoto, in the shape of enormous kanji characters. 4 "a temple", ga architect 9, (1990) pp. 118-119. 5"tawamureru", a childlike freedom from cares. 6 "utsuroi", transient, floating, ever-changing. 7 "kaihoteki", open, frank, easy, flexible. 8 sliding rice paper screens. 53. daniel naegele the readymade: duchamp's thing marcel duchamp fully appreciated the twentieth century's proclivity for certainty and classification and this attitude became an essential component of his art. in this he was not unlike freud or einstein or, in his immediate artistic milieu of belle ipoque paris, stravinsky or raymond roussel. of the playwright roussel, duchamp once noted with admiration that "starting with a sentence ... he made a word game with kinds of parentheses .. . his word play had a hidden meaning ... it was an obscurity of another order.1 roussel had economically undermined the totalizing tendency of word order, throwing all of its accepted significance into question. he did so by employing, not destroying, the 'givens.' duchamp's strategy would be similar as is evident in his readymades. duchamp describes the readymades in terms of what they were not. they "weren't works of art ... weren't sketches" but rather objects, 'things' "to which no art terms applied."(cabanne, p . 48) like roussel's parentheses which are not words but marks (not unlike letters in their most material sense), duchamp's things were imbued with the accoutrements of art but were not 'retinal' art. like bracketing, they are inserted into a highly structured world, and in the most economical manner question expose its fundamental nature. as strategy the readymade was hardly ready made, rather it came about as the logical next step in duchamp's seemingly methodical approach to art, an approach in no way unusual or exceptional until february of 1912. at that time, duchamp sent his recently-completed nude descending the staircase to the paris independents where, according to him, his "fellow cubists did not like it and asked me to, at least, change the title."2 he refused and withdrew the painting, but it is significant that the controversy surrounding nude descending the staircase had little to do with the inherent qualities of the work. rather it revolved around not only the painting's title, but also its apparent allegiance to both cubism and futurism, movements which were regarded at the time as mutually exclusive. the importance of these two extraneous issues titling and classification were never forgotten by duchamp. together with framing and the notion of museumizing itself they serve as society's means of appropriating art, of controlling its display and therefore its momentum. collectively, titling, framing, classification, and museumizing form a sort of systematic thinking, an ideology if you will (and one which extended far beyond the jurisdiction of the art world), whose authority and coerciveness duchamp began to question and ultimately set out to undermine. in effect, duchamp's readymades unmasked the 'act' of representation. he would expose the arbitrary nature and illusionistic function of 'retinal' art by presenting an analogous condition, that is, by re-presenting representation, a tactic not new to the visual arts in france. courbet's the painter's studio, real allegory, summing up a phase of seven years in my artistic life from 1854-553 and any of a number of paintings by seurat from the 1880's to 1891 might be seen as relevant predecessors to duchamp's attempt. in the circus, for example, seurat painted the perimeter of his canvas to resemble a frame. this painted frame suggests that what is being portrayed in paint is a picture of a picture. that is, what we see is a painting of a framed picture, a painting whose proportions neatly coincide with those of the re-presented image, whose boundaries begin where the delineated boundaries of the re-presented end. by painting an illusionistic frame, seurat appropriates the act of containment. seizing the boundary between art and reality, he renders the subjective objective, reducing a picture to its material components: paint and canvas. his pointilliste technique promotes the materiality of the medium, discreetly dividing the surface of the picture into equal dabs of paint and thus accentuating its physicality (cabanne, p. 47). while this division exposes the painting's objectivity, it simultaneously elevates its illusionism for its dot rendering insists that the 'picture' be actively constructed by the viewer. by objectifying, seurat underscored the subjective nature of perception. picasso's first collage still life with chair caning (1911-12) poses a similar question by replacing the medium of paint with swatches of 'reality' notably a mariner's rope and a stock oil cloth pre-painted to resemble chair caning. here again the frame (the mariner's rope) is part of the artist's domain, and as a three-dimensional 'real' object begins to question the status of the apparently two-dimensional painting, confusing classification by situating itself somewhere between painting 71 • p a r \ c u i a r s and sculpture. duchamp protracted this question at first unwittingly beginning in 1913. when he "put a bicycle wheel on a stool, the fork down, there was no idea of a 'readymade,' or anything else. it was just a distraction. i didn't have any special reason to do it, or any intention of showing it, or describing anything."(cabanne, p. 47) in 1914, duchamp chose his first readymade, bottlerack. "i just bought it, at the bazaar of the town hall. the idea of an inscription came as i was doing it. there was an inscription on the bottle rack which i forget." there was no move to introduce the piece to the art world at this time. "when i moved from the rue saint-hippolyte to leave for the united states," duchamp continues, "my sister and sister-in-law took everything out, threw it in the garbage, and said no more about it. it was in 1915, especially, in the united states, that i did other objects with inscriptions, like the snow shovel, on which i wrote something in english. the word 'readymade' thrust itself on me then."(de harnoncourt and mcshine, p. 275) not until 1917, when duchamp purchased a urinal from 'mott works' company in new york, signed it 'r. mutt,' titled it fountain and submitted it to the independents exhibition to be hung on the wall rotated and upside down, did he confront the artistic establishment with his things. duchamp saw the readymade as an attempt to "reduce the idea of aesthetic consideration to the choice of the mind, not to the ability or cleverness of the hand which i objected to in many paintings of my generation." (de harnoncourt and mcshine, p. 275) he very carefully selected these objects. "i had to beware of its 'look.' it's very difficult to choose an object, because, at the end of fifteen days, you begin to like it or to hate it. you have to approach something with an indifference, as if you had no aesthetic emotion. the choice of readymades is always based on visual indifference and, at the same time, on the total absence of good or bad taste."(cabanne, p. 48) for duchamp, taste is merely a habit, the "repetition of something already accepted" and he maintained that mechanical drawing enabled him to avoid taste since it lies "outside all pictorial convention." he insisted that the 'functionalism' of the object "was already obliterated by the fact that i took it out of the earth and onto the planet of aesthetics." (cabanne, p. 276) finally, regarding the short sentences which he occasionally inscribed on the readymades, they were not intended to describe the object "like a title" but instead, duchamp says, "meant to carry the mind of the spectator towards other regions more verbal."4 duchamp did several variations on the readymade theme, but proliferation was necessarily prohibited by his own prescription for the objects: visual indifference and an absence of taste, that is "the repetition of something already accepted." that duchamp later found it desirable to "expose the basic antinomy between art and readymades" by introducing a "reciprocal readymade" which would turn classic art into everyday objects ("use a rembrandt as an ironing board"), suggests that his attempt to situate his work outside the boundaries of the art world was something which needed to be renewed regularly, that perhaps the museumizing tendency was more totalizing, or more accommodating, than he had initially thought. or simply that his things, when considered as such, might have had an unanticipated appeal, might possess merit in themselves, not as anti-art. certainly, recent art theoryand criticism view the readymade not so much as an object but as a gesture or as a moment in the history of art. octavio paz deems the readymades 'an-artistic,' something in between art and anti-art, something "indifferent, existing in the void." he notes that "their interest is not plastic but critical or philosophical" and judges them "beyond beauty and ugliness ... not creations, but signs, questioning or negating the act of creation." for him, the readymade "does not postulate a new value" rather it is "criticism in action;" it exudes "nonsignificance." here we might ask how paz can assign nonsignificance to that which he previously designated as sign. he concedes that "form projects meaning" and consequently "nothing is more difficult than to find an object that is really neutral." yet clearly, we must add, the readymades have form, often very pleasing form, and are anything but neutral. presumably paz would counter that duchamp neutralized these things and that he did so by placing them in an art museum, by treating them as if they were, figuratively speaking, 'framed.' "detached from its original context," paz proceeds, "the 73 • p a r \ c u i a r s • p a r \ i c u i a r s 74 readymade suddenly loses all significance and is converted into an object existing in a vacuum, into a thing without any embellishment." but the museum is not a vacuum, we might argue, in fact it serves as the missing frame which insists that we consider objects within its confines as worthy of contemplation. furthermore, titles, inscriptions, pedestals and spotlighting would certainly seem to embellish the readymade. and paz again concedes that the "really neutral" quality lasts "only for a moment" after which they succumb to an "invisible transformation and become objects for contemplation, study, or irritation."5 peter burger, too, finds duchamp's readymades "not works of art but manifestations."6 readymades serve as exemplars in burger's 'theory of the avant-garde' which convincingly argues that avant-garde art sought to overthrow bourgeois art by interrogating the purpose or function of art, its production and its reception. like paz, burger believes that "the meaning" of the readymade cannot be inferred from its "form-content totality." rather meaning can be ascertained "only from the contrast between mass-produced object on the one hand, and signature and art exhibit on the other." he sees the readymade as a provocation that relies "on what it turns against: here, it is the idea that the individual is the subject of artistic creation." both paz and burger, perhaps in following the artist's cues, would seem to deny the 'thingness' of duchamp's things, yet both would agree that his objects bicycle wheel, bottlerack, urinal, comb, snow shovel, etc. were carefully selected. presumably both would recognize that these readymades share certain (decidedly non-pictorial?) characteristics, qualities which when considered collectively might even constitute if not an aesthetic, an 'obscurity of another order.' diagrammatic, even mathematical, the "form-content totality" of these things certainly might be regarded as a threedimensional formation of the mechanical drawing duchamp employed in his attempt to avoid tastemaking. all of this is to say that lost in paz's claim that the readymade "does not postulate a new value" and in burger's assurance that readymades are mere "manifestations" is the distinctive 'thingness' of these things as a positive characteristic worthy of contemplation in itself. 'thingness' is a quality martin heidegger investigates in his die frage nach dem ding, broaching the topic by contrasting the characteristics of modern science with those of ancient or medieval science. he dismisses the factual, experimental, measuring qualities of modern science in favor of a more fundamental feature which he claims "rules and determines the basic movement of science itself." this characteristic is science's "manner of working with the things and the metaphysical projection of the thingness of the things." heidegger deems this manner mathematical and proceeds to analyze its formation. the greek expression ta mathemata means "what can be learned and thus, at the same time, what can be taught." it is identified and understood in connection with its several determinations one of which is ta pragmata, that is, "things insofar as we have to do with them at all, whether we work on them, use them, transform them, or only look at and examine them." heidegger goes on to note that the numerical is something mathematical and not vice versa. this is so because the mathematical is "that about' things which we really already know. therefore we do not get it out of things, but, in a certain way, we bring it already with us."7 when we recognize in things something which we already have, this recognition is "genuine learning" and thus the numerical is something learnable for no thing or things in themselves exude threeness, for example, but "we can count three things only if we already know 'three'." heidegger concludes that "the most difficult learning is to come to know actually and to the very foundations what we already know. such learning ... demands dwelling continually on what appears to be nearest to us, for instance, on the question of what a thing is. we steadfastly ask the same question which in terms of utility is obviously useless of what a thing is, what tools are, what man is, what a work of art is, what the state and the world are."(heidegger, p. 252) in a truly philosophical approach to science, heidegger notes, scientists seek to "create new ways of posing questions and, above all, hold out in the questionable." (heidegger, p. 248) heidegger's philosophy offers another way of viewing duchamp's project. duchamp, it could be said, captures the basic movement of art itself by focusing on its "manner of working with the things and the metaphysical projection of the thingness of things." this leads to something more than merely critical. in illuminating fundamental issues of art naming, perception, measuring he questioned the nature of knowledge. while the readymade may serve to dismantle, it also offers its ' thingness' for contemplation. in rendering visible museumization, the thingness of things becomes obvious. when heidegger concludes that the mathematical is "this fundamental position we take toward things, ... the fundamental presupposition of the knowledge of things," it is this position, this presupposition that duchamp 'holds out as questionable.' duchamp's questioning transcends the issue of museumization as it confronted him beginning in 1912. his investigation was ontological, in the deepest sense of the word philosophical. in concluding it must be noted that duchamps strategy of re-presenting representation extended far beyond the individual object. although he subscribed to a philosophy of indifference, abhorred routine, and feared the habitual as taste-making, like no other artist marcel duchamp promoted the cumulative nature of his work. time and again he collected his works together, representing them as miniatures in, for example, the large glass or the box in a valise. for walter arensburg, duchamp collected himself, amassing what has been called the largest single collection of an artist's work to be displayed anywhere, bringing together nearly all his major works. as a precondition for donating the collection to a museum in the early fifties, duchamp and arensburg required that the museum guarantee exhibition of the work for not less than twe?nty-five years. only the philadelphia museum of art was interested in these terms and philadelphia is where the oeuvre is housed today, displayed almost exactly as duchamp himself specified. by collecting and classifying, he countered the twentieth century penchant for collection and classification. 1 pierre cabanne, dialogues with ma rcel duchamp, trans. ron padgett (london: da capo, 1979), p. 41. 2 quoted in marcel duchamp, eds. anne d ' harnoncourt and kynaston mcshine (new york: the museum of modern art, 1973), ~· 258. see michael fried, "representing representation: on the central group in courbet's studio," in allegory and representation, ed . stephen j. greenblatt (baltimore: johns hopkins university press, 1981). 4 marcel duchamp, "apropos of ' readymades'," in the writings of ma rcel duchamp, edited by michel sanouillet and elmer peterson (new york: da capo press, 1988), p . 141. this p assage is taken from a talk delivered by duchamp at the museum of modern art, new york, oct. 19, 1961. 5 octavio paz, marcel duchamp: appearance stripped bare, trans. rachel phillips and donald gardner (new york: little, brown and company, 1990), p. 22-24. 6 peter burger, theory of the avant-garde, trans. michael shaw (minneapolis: university of minnesota press, 1984), p. 52. translation based on the second edition of theorie der avantgarde (frankfurt: suhrkamp verlag, 1974, 1980). the illustrative text which supports this claim includes a photograph which more closely conforms to a standard definition of art than does (or did) duchamp's thing, stieglitz's photograph of duchamp's fountain. the image is saturated with gender iconography, both male and female. it was placed by duchamp in the the blind man itself a duchampian enterprise in the form of an art journal ~which represented the art world tendency towards representation in its critical literal?). martin h eidegger, basic writings, ed. david farrell krell (new york: harper & row, 1977), pp. 247-255. this selection, here entitled "modern science, metaphysics, and mathematics" appears in heidegger's what is a thing? trans. w. b. barton, jr. and vera deutsch from the original die frage nach dem ding (tiibingen: max niemeyer verlag, 1962), pp. 50-83. 75 • p a r \ c u i a r s • 102 in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 2 p r e s e n c e editorial / ross jenner presence over the past decade or so, initiatives have emerged to recover some form of presence against a global culture that, largely through electronic technology, has become more and more perfectly “cartesian”. we now seem, however, to be at the beginning of a situation where new presence elements in our everyday world are recovering some ground, and there is a growing emphasis on the physical, material, performative and atmospheric—rather than meaning and semiotics. materiality and its effects have come to assume what hans ulrich gumbrecht, terms a “non-hermeneutic” presence (2004: 1-20). today, we no longer believe that a complex of meanings can be kept separate from its medium of presentation, that is, from material. neither is pure manipulation of data, without aesthetic and bodily intention, able to produce architecture. the material and the immaterial are not easily divided. while presence concerns communication, it concerns space even more—through its occupation (or dis-occupation) and activation. gumbrecht reminds us that, what is “present” to us (in the sense of the latin prae-esse), is “in front of us, in reach of and tangible for our bodies” (17). he reminds us also of george steiner’s remarks that the arts, “wonderfully rooted in substance, in the human body, in stone, in pigment, in the twanging of gut or the weight of wind on reeds”, begin, but do not end, in immanence. the task of the aesthetic is to “quicken into presence the continuum between temporality and eternity, between matter and spirit, between man and ‘the other’” (steiner, 1989: 227). absence of presence is not the same as presence of absence, in which traces, silences or voids powerfully embody (and make present) something not present. for example: the voids of berlin as captured by daniel libeskind and peter eisenman; or the voids of eduardo chillida, jorge oteiza and tadao ando; the silence of john cage and the mā of toru takemitsu. they all involve experience and affect. by contrast, representation seems to be involved with the “age of the sign” and “conceptual deduction” as gumbrecht asserts (2004: 57). however, for jean-luc nancy in france, representation “is as old as the west”, and maybe there is “no humanity (and, perhaps, no animality) that does not include representation” (1993: p. 1). nancy’s conception of presence does not refer to a permanent state, but to nascence: “presence itself is birth, the coming that effaces itself and brings itself back” (5). gumbrecht relates this wavering to the in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 3 editorial / from beaux-arts to bim p r e s e n c e double movement of withdrawal and unconcealment in martin heidegger, particularly in relation to his account of a greek temple in terms of presence via the notions of “earth” and “world”. here, “the sheer presence of the temple triggers the unconcealment of a number of things—in their thingness—that surround the temple” (2004: 73). for nancy the very act and pleasure of drawing, insofar as it is “the opening of form” (p. 1), is also a nascence. what would it mean for a drawing, building, artwork or poem to perform or keep alive the performance of its birth? perhaps the malleability of alvaro siza’s works (see molteni, 2003), which retain the ‘life’ of their first sketches, or lemi ponifasio’s irruptive choreography (ponifasio, 2009) provide some hints to the potential of works in statu nascendi. in addition, a human tendency to endow buildings and artworks with life includes practices involving the holy and tapu, such as sacrifice, rites of foundation and the address to a living ancestor (in whare and fale, for example). these practices frame, stage and enact the effect of “living presence”—exceeding a disinterested aesthetic contemplation of art’s formal qualities (eck, 2015: 172). “studying what makes viewers deny the representational character of art,” argues caroline van eck, “will help understanding why art is such a universal feature of human life” (209). after all, “aesthetic experience” provides feelings of intensity unknown in specific everyday worlds for there is no aesthetic experience without presence effects emerging seemingly out of nowhere. such tendencies raise the question of the relationship between life and presence, the ways in which both dimensions metabolically participate in our material environment and multiple modalities of incarnation in the arts. in all fields of art practice, we are led to ask what part presence plays, particularly the status of presence in virtual reality and digital representation obsessed with verisimilitude. how can even purposeful design, particularly in an era of parametricism, retain an element of the status nascendi, as unprogrammed (or even unprogrammable) emergence? as nancy finds, the “joy of averring oneself to be continually in the state of being born—a rejoicing of birth, a birth of rejoicing” requires an acceptance, even embrace, of the fact that existence “comes nude into the world” (2004: back cover). this issue derives from the symposium on the theme of presence accompanied by a colloquium, led by sir harold marshall, which took place in auckland on thursday, friday and saturday 12-14 july 2018 at which hans ulrich gumbrecht was keynote speaker. reviewed papers the first four reviewed papers treat the theme of making absence present in space and process. in “between presence and absence: phenomenal interstitiality in eisenman’s guardiola house,” adrian lo examines peter eisenman’s treatment of architecture as a form of text which can be read through traces of presence and absence generated by his design process. while the notion of the trace has been examined by scholars already, it has largely been overlooked in the guardiola house, an un-built project dating from 1988. it is here that lo finds the trace developed particularly in terms of the interstitial, proposing that a framework focused here can present novel strategies in notation for recording and indexing 4 editorial / from beaux-arts to bim p r e s e n c e in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 instances of absence and presence. lo proposes, further, that the guardiola house presents a critical shift in eisenman’s work. here, for the first time, he explored the trace in three dimensions as a condition of the interstitial enacted through operations of imprinting. this not only brought about the merging of constituent geometries but also provided a new way of blurring spaces (and even concepts) to constitute what might be termed a ‘phenomenal’ state of the interstitial, consistent with the distinction rowe and slutzky made between ‘literal’ and ‘phenomenal’ transparency. the house reflects eisenman’s shift from the rulebound transformations framed by structuralism to the complex and unpredictable “events” of post-structuralism. in “ex uno lapide: a making present of absence”, konrad buhagiar, guillaume dreyfuss and ephraim joris discuss a drawing protocol, which they term the “monolith drawing”, whereby an architectural figure is extracted from a single volume, synchronising analogical with digital thinking to enter history through our capacity to long for, and hence experience, something absent. lacan assumes there cannot be absence in an objective world, since absence can only exist through symbolic or representative means. thus, the authors argue, it is through the representational means of the monolith drawing that architects are enabled to design presence where there is none. hence, they explore and (re)deploy the notion of ex uno lapide in contemporary architectural production. such creative practice recovers a tradition linking geology with architectonic drawing, and operating in conceptual space through means of contained sets of formal operations to generate a particular kind of architecture. the monolith drawing is here explained in relation to the design of a museum extension to house a tapestry cycle by peter paul rubens, adjacent to st john’s co-cathedral in valletta. these tapestries represent the idea of transubstantiation. in response, the museum design acts as a closed vessel, a monumental reliquary, enabling a closed and controlled environment to ensure the conservation of the artwork. the reliquary is interpreted as a container of meaning, directing a reciprocal gaze towards the idea of meaningful absence. the monolith drawing installs two important principles. the idea of the mirror construct, in which an object is depicted using parallel lines to project its mirror image and allow twofold vision, outwards (res extensa) and inwards (res cogitans); and the idea of ex uno lapide—a strategy where architecture is carved out of solid mass. this carving is guided by allowing the depicted object and its mirror image to intersect. its transcriptions allow for a drawing with history; a tracing of its own tracing. simon twose and jules moloney, in “drawing canyon: sfumato presences in drawing and landscape”, propose that architectural drawing can involve the merging of multiple presences. the permanent interruption, tension and intensity of mark-making, here merges with intensities in what the marks draw, be it architectural space or landscape. their paper reports on “canyon”, a hybrid drawing project that intensifies drawing’s capacity for smudged presences. canyon attempts to develop an ever-emergent, nascent architecture from presences in drawing and landscape. the first stage of “canyon” was exhibited at the palazzo bembo in the xvi venice biennale. it draws atmospheres from the dynamic undersea landscape of kaikōura canyon, aotearoa/nz, using a hybrid of hand sketches, soundscapes and virtual reality to distil architectural possibilities from the canyon’s vast body of water, recently jolted by huge forces in the 2016 kaikōura earthquake. this landscape is known through instrumental descriptions: sonic scans, digital models and scientific data. less easy to record, in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 5 editorial / from beaux-arts to bim p r e s e n c e however, is its powerful and ominous presence. the canyon has unimaginable mass and scale, with water kilometres deep and is figured by seismic jolts, turbid flows, pressures and intensities. “canyon” imaginatively projects into this unseen landscape, crossing its ominous presence with evocative graphite sketches, soundscapes and the canyon-like boundlessness of virtual reality. this work proposes hybrid drawing as an open medium figured by blurred presences. it resonates with jean-luc nancy’s notion of drawing as the opening of form, indicating “the traced figure’s ‘essential incompleteness, a non-closure or non-totalizing of form’” (2013: 1). they extend the openness of gestural sketching to the digital and sensorial, and argue that vr, and sound, can be sketch-like: they too are figured by “recalcitrant, ‘meaningless’ smears and blotches” (elkins, 1995: 860). they argue that such hybrid, “non-semiotic’’ marks draw presences, blurred presences, making evident an architecture of nascence. stepan vaneyan’s “jantzen and sedlmayr: diaphaneia—an impossible presence?” examines the notion of “diaphanous structure” as a correspondence between the structure of ritual in gothic architecture, which realises the holy presence symbolically, and that of the cult space, where experience of theophany is made manifest visually. hans jantzen first introduced his programmatic theory of “diaphanous structure” (diaphane struktur) with the term “diaphaneia” in his 1927 article “on gothic church space” (“über den gotischen kirchenraum”). by that time the word had been used in near-esoteric circles (from jacob boehme to pierre teilhard de chardin) and in joyce’s ulysses, 1922. jantzen’s seminal article is dedicated to the space of the gothic cathedral, which he sees as a ritual-liturgical and multi-layered space that has, he argues, a “diaphanous structure”. in his late texts, from the 1950 and 1960s, he explored “diaphaneia” as a universal way of keeping in view the horizon of the invisible presence. most importantly, jantzen’s “diaphanous structure” informs all levels of the gothic cathedral—from the walls of the nave to the stained glass, in other words, to colour. in his paper, vaneyan contrasts jantzen’s “diaphaneia” with that of hans sedlmayr’s in the origins of the cathedral (die entstehung der kathedrale), 1951, noting that whilst for both the term presupposes the transcendent, for jantzen this transcendence concerns space, whereas for sedlmayr it concerns corporeality—for instance, in the vertical and the weightless canopy (baldachino) that enters the church space from above. this leads vaneyan to question whether “diaphaneia” might be merely a means of “spiritualisation” of both the cathedral per se and of architectural theory. further, he questions whether a “mnémotechnique” is enough to ensure the presence of the other or does it become a sign of its absence? while architecture keeps silent, an architectural theorist speaks—or, using derrida’s words, “diaphaneia” becomes “diaphonia” (2011). a further reviewed paper addresses the issue of presence in relation to built heritage. in “heritage & persistence: the case of the kaiapoi fragment”, andrew douglas and nicola short consider a small surviving portion of the kaiapoi woollen company building, a warehouse and offices constructed in central auckland, aotearoa/new zealand, in 1913. known as the kaiapoi fragment, the incongruity of this persisting building element was foregrounded in 2017, when the griffiths holdings building, a plain deco, two-story commercial building immediately adjoining it, was demolished to make way for an underground station. a small portion of the kaiapoi woollen company building, itself demolished in 1964, had inadvertently remained fused to the party wall of the griffiths holdings building. it was this that was left standing incongruously with the 6 editorial / from beaux-arts to bim p r e s e n c e in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 removal of the latter. for douglas and short, this tenuous persistence prompts broader questions, not only about the constitution of the present and future by cultural heritage, but also about the precarity of the contemporary present tout court. in particular, they link this precarity to gumbrecht’s (2004 and 2014) recognition of an emerging, yet still undefined, post-historicist chronotope. as gumbrecht argues, if the preceding, historicist chronotope was characterised by a “narrow present”, one in which passing historical time provides immediately cogent bearings for acting on, and organising, an impending future, our current present, “inundated by memories and objects form the past”, themselves shorn of organising metanarratives, posits a truncated future, one distanced from the present, itself stalled and broadening inordinately (2014: 54-55). in their paper, douglas and short follow gumbrecht’s use of the chronotope to account for this compounded nature of the present and the past, a notion in fact developed by mikhail bakhtin to describe particular fusions of space and time evident across the history of the novel (see bakhtin and holquist, 2000). to better grasp the potential of gumbrecht’s claims, they explore what for bakhtin underwrites the chronotope—dialogical exchange. in turn, they examine a particular aspect of dialogue developed by henri bergson (1935/1991), who himself tied such exchange to a foundational agent capable of dissolving all spatio-temporal amalgamation—duration. as a consequence, they are led to ask how bergson’s broader emphasis on the “‘primacy of memory’ over a ’primacy of perception’” (lawlor 2003: ix) might assist in reworking gumbrecht’s notion of presence in heritage contexts. following leonard lawlor’s recognition of a “non-phenomenological concept of presence” in bergson (x), the authors attempt a provisional anatomy of presence, one prompted by—despite its diminutive scale—the kaiapoi fragment itself.    the remaining reviewed paper considers absence in relation to place. in “absence, silence, and the shades of takemitsu’s ma in venice”, felipe lanuza rilling proposes a dialogue between absence and silence, specifically between his own interpretations of absence through layered images and silence as it features in the musical works by tōru takemitsu. his layered images seek to re-present experiences of absence as they appear to the senses in the built environment. they respond to what he sees as the capacity of absence to evoke multiple, uncertain and distant presences that seem to be away from our grasp. in takemitsu’s multi-layered and seemingly unstructured pieces, silence plays a key role in bringing about ma, which refers to a meaningful spatio-temporal gap, interval or in-between condition, often invested with metaphysical connotations of great significance in japanese culture. following a hint by composer philip dawson, the advice of musical interpreter cristián alvear, and largely driven by intuition, rilling explores the albeit distant resonances of his visual work in the acclaimed japanese composer’s music. in this way, he expands the interpretative possibilities of absence and layering in representing the vanishing atmospheres of venice, an example of fragile existence and aggregated formation.  postgraduate creative design research in a reviewed design research paper arising out of a master of architecture (professional) degree at victoria, university of wellington, nina boyd examines the relationship between architecture and the tourist experience. in her project titled, “staging tourism: performing place”, boyd argues that in architecture the in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 7 editorial / from beaux-arts to bim p r e s e n c e corporeality of the tourist is typically reduced to acts of viewing. contrastingly, her project explores and devises multiple acts of mobilisation to force a paradigmatic shift from the “gaze” to “performance”. privileging sensuous experiences and active choreography, the project investigates how architecture can stage and amplify the multiplex performances of tourism in order to produce more complex accounts and experiences of place. utilising a “design through research” methodology, the design proposition is developed through iterative design experiments enacted across three increasing scales: the first engaging with the human scale through 1:1 installation; the second testing the performative dimensions of tourism as embodied programmatically via hotel design; and, the third testing the nature of tourism’s public performance through the design of an artificial island for wellington’s shelly bay. reviews completing the issue are three book reviews. the first, by john dixon hunt, considers anuradha chattergee’s, john ruskin and the fabric of architecture (2017) published by routledge press. the second, by carl douglas, addresses marian macken’s, binding space: the book as spatial practice (2018) also released by routledge press. the third, by mark jackson, engages with farzaneh haghighi’s, is the tehran bazaar dead? : foucault, politics, and architecture (2018) pub-lished by cambridge scholars publishing. finally, the adventure into presence carried by this issue may be thought, as gumbrecht himself has subsequently characterised the symposium and colloquium that was nascent for the papers offered here, as a “desire for and first trace of a recovery of presence culture” (personal communication, 2016). against an insistent “universe of contingency”, what working on and with presence potentiates is the opening of “fault lines” in a present saturated with modes of control and drives to commodify (personal communication, 2016). presence as erring immediacy, precisely suggests a critical counter to the insistent swathe of techniques determining contemporary attention. in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 8 editorial / from beaux-arts to bim p r e s e n c e references bakhtin, m., holquist, m. (ed.) (2000). the dialogical imagination: four essays by m.m. bakhtin (c. emerson & m. holquist, trans.). austin, tx: university of texas press. bergson, h. (1935/1991). matter and memory (n. margaret paul, w. scott palmer, trans.). new york, ny: zone books. derrida, j. (2011). voice and phenomenon : introduction to the problem of the sign in husserl’s phenomenology (l. lawlor, trans.). evanston, ill: northwestern university press. eck, c. van (2015). art, aagency and lliving presence: from the animated image to the excessive object. boston, ma: de gruyter. elkins, j. (1995). “marks, traces, ‘traits’, contours, ‘orli’, and ‘splendores’: nonsemiotic elements in pictures.” critical inquiry, vol. 21, no. 4, 822-860. gumbrecht, h. u. (2004). production of presence: what meaning cannot convey. stanford, ca: stanford university press. gumbrecht, h. u. (2014). our broad present: time and contemporary culture. new york, ny: columbia university press. jantzen, h. (2000). über den gotischen kirchenraum und andere aufsätze, berlin: mann [originally freiburger wissenschaftliche gesellschaft, heft 15, freiburg in breisgau, 1928]. lawlor, l. (2003). the challenge of bergsonism. london, uk: continuum. nancy, j. l. (1993). the birth to presence (b. holmes, et. al., trans.). stanford, ca: stanford university press. nancy, j. l. (2013). the pleasure in drawing (p. armstrong, trans.). oxford, uk: oxford university press. ponifasio, l. (2009) tempest: without a body [performance] retrieved from https://www. youtube.com/ watch?v=wflqv85ucww& feature=player_embedded molteni, e. (2008). comme un sculpteur, on doit maintenir l’argile humide. casabella, 763, 11. reverb. (2016). kaiapoi building fragment heritage report. unpublished report commissioned by auckland transport. steiner, g. (1989). real presences: is there anything in what we say? london, uk: faber. giuliano da sangallo (?) . facing fronting s. maria delle carceri, prato. 1485-95. gordana kostich-lefebvre the face opens the primordial discourse whose first word is obligation, which no "inferiority" permits avoiding. -levinas, "ethics and the face"1 this exercise is merely the beginning of an etymological study on the fa9ade. it is less a search for an historical perspective of the building surface than a routine task of monitoring the "good old" foundation of architectural terms and meanings. it examines the ancient terminology for its own contemporary cracks, as much as it watches for the appearance of newer ones, in order to ensure that not too much falls into them. scrutinising the fa9ade and dusting it off will inevitably upset our ordinary architectural terminology, but i hope that it will also refresh memories. nor will some relearning of "other" dimensions communicated through our "banal" fa9ade be excluded. aspects of frontality are the main issue. the english word far;ade was imported from the french in the sixteenth century. the french, in turn, devolved from the italianfacciata, and the latinfacies, appearance. another cognate isfaccia, "face" in modern italian lfacia in vulgar latin). they all stem fromfacereto make, render, realise, execute. ls the fa9ade an ontological extension of making? the term that vitruvius consistently and predominantly used for the front of a building is "simply"frons.frontis, meaning literally forehead2 (gr. metopon), browthe prominent part of the face (gr. prosopon). 3 transferred to a building, this became frons aedem, or the famous frons scenae; thus in fronte et postico templi, "in front and back of the temple" is said, not in antico et postico . in the genitive,frontis, 4 frons also designated a forepart of a book, hence the frontispiece. 5 in medieval vocabulary frontispicium ecclesiae was, of course, the principal fa9ade . it is the straightforwardness (frontality) ofjrons that establishes a facing situation and enables a direct, dignified (appropriateness emphasised), honest (essential) encounter, thus imposing a certain (moral) authority. the "front" is a stature. 6 everything relating to it is referential, even in modern languages. the "front" is unequivocally situated both on the artefact to which it belongs as the superior side, and also in direct relation with another, necessary, engaged party, be it a river, park, piazza or an admirer. a constant in this coupling is a variable traversable distance between "participants." in order to approach the "front," a fa9ade has to be qualified as the main fa9ade. the proper latin verb for/ace, to stand opposite, is (a)spectare; aspectus, view, and conspectus, full view, are the "correct" nouns . it is the viewing, looking at, observing as a spectator, just as in "real" theatrical performances, that turns the observed into a spectacle. in addition, the buildings, altars and images of gods "actively"7 look atthey spectant; and in turn, they are looked at and receive regard. vitruvius revealed a lot about these "exchanges" in book four, chapter five"how the temple should face." for a moment, let us move around vitruvius, and consult his contemporary varro, the linguist. in his own pursuit of retrieving the meanings of "obscured words" in the first century a.d., varro provided an explanation that is still useful for the meaning and relationship between 1.. emmanuel levinas, totality and infinity: an essay on exteriority (pittsburgh: duquesne university press, 1969), 201. 2. when dealing with the building/body analogy, and discussing proportioning the face (os capitis and ipsius oris) in iii.1.2, vitruvius referred to the human forehead, frons . 3. vitruvius used other common words for appearance, like species (the particular "looks" which distinguish a class of objects/creatures sharing similar appearances); where we could, with regard to a building, possibly use fa9ade (but not "elevation," as it stands in the infelicitous loeb translation), although classes, kinds, and species better fit in some cases (below, de architectura , iii.3.1 ). "recognisable appearance" is adequate and would preserve a little of spectare in species. vitruvius, dearchitectura, for example in iii.3: species autem aedium sunt quinque ("there are five classes [according to their appearance] of buildings"); or in i.1.4: operis speciem deformare valeat ("speaking about the drafting skills of architects needed to present the appearance (looks) of the works which they want to create"). architectural drawing devices, which fall into species, are obviously undifferentiated; they are anything drawn to clarify an architect's intentions. in the preface to book five, species are the sides of a cube. 4. the nominative homonym frons, frondis f. (leaf, foliage) points to the possible visual interplay between faces and leafy vegetation as a result of semantic closeness. this is evidenced in the conjuring up of numerous facial and vegetal representations. 5. frans + species = first and foremost frontal appearance. 6. to which status relates both etymologically and logically; both stemming from the sanskrit sta, to stand up. 3 7. the verb is used in the active sense. the building faces and/or looks at itself. it is not being looked at. the spectators. on the other hand, look at it on their own. 8. varro, de lingua latina. trans. roland g. kent (loeb classical library, 1967). vi.viii.78. varro developed a theoretical stance that presents facere as closest to crafting in vi.42, where he introduced the concept of an action (actionum) as a tripartite process consisting of firstly motion of the mind (agitatus mentis); secondly, consideration (cogitare). which corresponds to the design or planning of that which shall later be done or said (dicere or facere); and. finally, that which is done or said (facere or dicere). 9. varro's further careful distinction of facere (to make) from similar, interfering verbs like age re (to act, do) and gerere (to carry, carry on) opens with "for a person can facere something and not agere it" (vi.viii.77); and develops into defining facere in terms of the level of subject's participation in action. he also notes the popular contemporary corruption of the purity of these verbal uses. "but because general practice has used these words indiscriminately rather than with care. we use them in transferred meanings; for he who says something (dicit) we say make words (facere verba). and he who acts something (agit) we say is not inficiens. 'failing to do' something (inficientem) ." (vi.viii.78) 10. varro. de lingua latina. vi.viii.78. 11. levinas, totality and infinity, 78. 12. what is known as the "princip le of frontality" in art is rather common to bu ildings, especially those of importance: temples, palaces, government buildings, and bu il din gs of foreign stat(e)-ure or representation. the supreme examples of frontal representation in art are the byzantine devotional icons. in christian art generally "the degree of frontality sometimes seems to correspond to the sanctity of the person depicted, christ, the virgin and angels being portrayed full face, the apostles three-quarters, whi le judas and other evil-doers might even be in profile." james hall, the history of ideas and images in italian art (new york: harper & row, 1983), 113. 4 facere, "to make," andfacies, "external appearance," "face," although he wrongly (customarily) derived the verb from the noun instead of vice versa. he is said to make (jacere) a thing who puts external appearance (jacies) on the thing which he makes (jacit). as the image maker (jictor) when he says "i shape" (jingo) puts a shape (jigura) on the object, and when he says "i form" (jormo) puts form (jorma) to it, so when he says "i make" (jacio), he puts an external appearance, a "face" (jacies) on it; by this external appearance there comes a distinction so that one thing could be said to be a garment, another a dish, and likewise the various things that are made by carpenters, image makers and other workers. he who furnishes a service, whose work does not stand out in concrete form so as to come under the observation ofour physical senses, is, by his action or motion (agitatus) thought rather to act (agere) than to make (jacere) something. 8 from the view expressed above, and other auxiliary explanations,9 it follows thatfacere is the resulting creative 10 work that "stands out in concrete form" and "comes under the observation of our physical senses." it is not surpri sing, then, that to face a building means both to stand in front of it "exchanging glances" and to "finish" it, to put a face on it. what is astonishing is that these meanings still persist even in english. thus our "to face" (to see and be seen, to encounter and be encountered, to define one's position according to the direction of one 's face) is a second-round development from the noun (this time), which has nothing to do with the "original" facing as a perceptible conclusion of making (taken from ideation to realisation) from which fac;:ade, asfacies, originated. the ethical stratum of"face to face" is somewhat veiled; it is more conspicuous in "fronting" (including frontage) than in "facing." "face to face" never ceases to be a primary condition, historically, socially and personally; it is an " ineducible relation" and remains the "ultimate situation.'' 11 as a concentration of visible senses and the most expressive bodily surface, the face epitomises a person; facing defines the position of the whole body according to the face-direction, while fronting is the upright posture of the whole being in an attentive situation. 'he basic, elemental mind (i refuse to call it primitive), facing was a matter of equally basic ethics, that, naturally, reflected social interactions; it was reflected in the perception of social spaces and, finally, in aesthetics. before they reached "very" advanced stages most cultures had considered that meeting full face, both friends and foes, was a measure of decency, and not only of courage . it was also a measure of giving and receiving honour, and of dignity. appearing and meeting in person, face to face, is a privileged modus of social encounter and exchange, although not the only one . most languages still entail idiomatic remnants of this understanding. since "face to face" was proper, morally uplifted interaction, frontal posture became the elevated, "right" posture, and frontality a legitimate, in itself dignified, if not the "right" aesthetic principle. 12 this axiomatic, "ineducible" and "ultimate situation" in human intenelations was a foundation for all subsequent, more abstract human institutions. one "faces" gods and demons, death, adversity or "real" life, even buildings and altars. the requirement is situational: two parties at a certain spatial distance concentrate on each other, front each other, measuring, learning and sensing each other 's surface and beyond j michelangelo. pitti madonna. detail. the surface, usually looking at each other. eye to eye 13 is synonymous with face to face. yet the spatial distance is filled with and modified by another distance, an ethical distance, measured by the level and kind of respect between the "facers." superficially, facing is a frontal appearance, an exposition of the fullest and, on the human level, most vulnerable surface of oneself, but it also provides an opportunity for an exposition or exhibition of the most dignified and/or most impressive "surface" of oneself. adoration, protection and decoration are therefore responses to and extensions of real and imaginary facing . the first of these belongs to love, which never tires ofa beloved's face (adornment coming along); the distances are shortest, and the space private, intimate. the latter two "excel" in the social realm and have a lot to do with the sizing of ethical interspace . decoration, we need to keep in mind, derives from decorumdignity, the sense of inner moral value, and the most desirable property in the self-presenting of buildings, according to both vitruvius and alberti. honour and honesty are related and revolve around distinguishing and dignifying. alberti talks about hones ta as that inner, appropriate relation of parts from which decorum , as grace and excellence, results. ornaments may be added to enhance decorum, but not to create it. the prospect of a close encounter with the supernatural added the irrational categories of reverence and awe to the facing through the a priori infinite distances set between the revered and supplicants. temples, of course, were meant to be faced frontally, to be approached directly, and so were the statues they protected. the fronton, 14 though, remained a protruded foreheada pediment, gable. in my view, the astonishing forehead of michelangelo's pitti madonna presents an eloquently delicate intertwining and overlapping of the ideas of the face, front, fronton and fayade unfolding here. the result is a temple-face with an arched pediment created on (out of) the madonna's forehead. framed within a gentle curvature of her scarf and her lower headband is a winged head that rests on a heavier, "velvety" headband or diadem (fascia, tenia) interrupted at the centre with what seems a precious stone. the insufficiently developed facial features of this fronton guardian veil his/her age and gender. to me, he looks like an older male rather than a child. this is an invaluable example of face made fayade. alberti diversified the vocabulary of the building's face by applying both.frons andfacies to the fa9ade; and vultus andfacies to human, animal and the faces of statues. 15 as a verbal noun, facies pertains to the inanimate more than the animate. it implies an outcome, a product, a result of a manual effort visible on its object, and consequently carries along an air of artificiality and pretence. literally, it meant an outward appearance, aspect or expression (susceptible to change, se in omnes facies vertere: literally, to change in every way 13. in english, however, it is taken to mean accordance between the parties and not a discourse which would include tension arising from their differences. this also means the most open in a discrete exchange. 14. maybe from fronto, frontonis f., a person with a big forehead. 15. 0e re aedificatoria , 7.16 ; 8.1 ; and momo o def principe (240) on stu pore, to mention just a few (loca) occasions. 5 brunelleschi. s. maria degliangeli. plan. 16. which is clearly a later development, although in common use in literatu re during augustan times (for example, cicero, horace, virgilius and ovid). 17. the modern italian ii volto (face) is a descendent of vultus. 18. the former indicated the ephemeral in a face, that is, an expression of a mood or character, and the latter, which is the original word for the mouth , was applied to the whole face. os was not normally used for the face of a building but for ports and entrances of roman houses. in the works of scenic writers, the plural denoted ornaments for the head and face; wh ich we learn from varro, again , as he tried-not without good, "oratorial" (oration comes from os) reason-to derive ornament from oris, although it actually came from ornare (to adorn), which is related to order, ordo, ordinis. (vi.viii.76) 19. in italian translation: "e con gran meravglia si videro di fronte un enorme arco di triomfo di tutti i colori." alberti, momo o de/ principe, nanni balestrini presentation (genova: costa & nolan, 1986), 154-55. 20. san lorenzo still searches for its front. although some of us might find its gallery of proposed physiognomies and temporary installations an interesting "body" of evidence of the impotence of "facing" the exterior of this church, this condition turns its interior into its on ly front. when the door is closed the square is faceless. 21. while fabbrica is a vo lume , faccia is a surface. 6 [virgil]). it also denoted a face, countenance, 16 and in transferred meaning, a character. synonyms such as vultus 17 and os, oris pertained more often to humanoids (humans and gods) and statues. 18 of the nouns and expressions derived from spec tare, conspectus was the closest to "frontal appearance." alberti utilised it, for example, in the momus, describing a wonderfully crafted and ornate celestial triumphal arch that showed conspecto e regione maxima-literally, "with the biggest side in full view."19 the "modem"facciata was born with the renaissance re-facing of old church fronts. alberti was responsible for at least two. facing the santa maria novella was clearly an act of crafting, putting together a design, making of a dignified front in communication with the piazza and people in front, while standing in front of and representing the church behind. the unrealised facciata of the medici church of san lorenzo is a paradigm of the fai;:ade 's separation from the building and the wall/surface behind despite a huge portfolio of designs .20 the wall and the face/fa9ade are different. the face engages in dialogues (even choruses); the wall is voiceless and faceless. except for being a division it does not communicate anything but displays materials and their finishings, often seen as faces. with or without holes the wall is lifeless, unless some breathtaking legend engages the imagination to persuade us otherwise. but it is the face given to the wall, made on or with the wall (and the floor or ceiling too), that is delegated to communicate with people and given conditions, to participate in their "situation." the relative autonomy of the appearance of renaissance buildings contributed to an understanding of the artificiality, replaceability and shallowness of the fai;:ade. faccia was necessary to close, cover and protect spatial incongruities; it was still a face, an intrinsic part offabbrica21 as the whole opus, and its removal would produce a transverse "section" of the building. facciata bordered being a possible object per se, a veneer or tableau, an articulated, dispensable surface, a skin over the wall, later to be commonly seen as a mask in its " modem" sense of non-identity, rather than the desired, borrowed or attracted identity the mask used to mean to "less sophisticated" societies.22 this realisation, together with the restructuring of other social spaces in the renaissance, produced a serious rearrangement in the ethico-aesthetic sphere. due honour and dignity became proportional to the mixture of the newly formulated value categories of magnificence and meraviglie.23 j j j an insight into a more general and casual understanding of"fai;:ade" comes from an ordinary statement made in 1485 by an ordinary, yet informed, florentine commentator on an extraordinary work. describing brunelleschi's oratory, santa maria degli angeli, the first centrally planned monument built in the renaissance, manetti wrote, "this temple was built with sixteen outside faces, eight inside faces and also with eight faces above the chapels."24 the temple, of course, was to revere god and honour the commune .25 this mundane description, written half a century after the initiation of the oratory, a period filled with an incomparable bustle ofconstruction in and around the city, provides clues about status ofjaccie. appearances, sides, views, surfaces, faces or facings? we learn that for manetti every intersection of three planes constituted a new faccia, which enabled him to count sixteen exterior "faces" on the octagonal building plan, whereas both rustici and vasari, in earlier and later accounts respectively, would reckon only eight. 26 thefaccie on the upper level above the chapels, which expressed the change in depth, were worth counting separately. finally,faccie "existed" both inside and outside27 which underlined the continuity, if not the permeability, of a building's "in" and "out," a trait that was "original" to the italian renaissance, considering its reliance on the solid wall. it was this kind of building, so dear to renaissance architects, that contributed modem ambiguity to the simplicity of the monodirectional "face to face." it also paved the way for the poly-frontal edifices we now take for granted. it should be mentioned here that the entrance often was, and still is, the only building part that truly allowed "face to face" relations on a human scale; the entrance is equally primary and "irreducible" as a "face to face" situation itself. with the main fai;:ade problematised by the poly-frontal treatment of centrally planned edifices, it was the main entrance (ianua principalis) that determined the principal face/fai;:ade; a hierarchy of accesses (main road, piazza, "front garden-park") reinforced it on the social level. the matter is complicated. ethics and aesthetics both deal with value judgments and emotions; "correctness" and a sense of beauty are more intertwined than commonly thought. with our present understanding of the mechanisms of perception and attention, and their effect on the dimensions and appearances of buildings and urban situations, architects have lately reasonably concentrated on the fragmenta1y, obtuse (angled) and oblique, and the "cadre." neither much space nor much willingness seems to be left for a "face to face" encounter with buildings. a less involving, less obliging and less defined, "in passing" mode with ever smoother fai;:ades corresponds to the increase of the shallow and peripheral in interhuman relations and to a general "speeding." we can only hope that, this time, the present taste for slanting and curving is neither an echo of, nor will be echoed by, ethical slanting. semantics is the easier part. could we benefit from a comprehension of the inadequacy of our indelicate use of the term "fai;:ade"? we use it to encompass a number of meanings : from the actual view and position of any building surface, including the front, for which the word "aspect" is better suited; to the vertical representations of projects in "paper architecture," views brought up from plans, for which the only correct term is "elevations," as they are a demonstrative architectural tool "elevated" from drawings into an impossible view, an apparition, recognised in the old term orthographia. the fai;:ade as a cover-up is a choice and not a rule. we might need to brood a little more on the free fai;:ade . 22. although intending to stay within my anthropological limits , i should not refuse the benefit of invoking (briefly) an unrelated culture and its related image, like the intricately carved (abundance of facere) polynesian parata or koruru face/head, a model for a facial design actually incised in vivo . lack of space, unfortunately, prevents elaboration. 23. it does not seem viable to me that the renaissance obsession with central perspective had much to do with ethical considerations. 24. "el quale tempio e fondato di fuori a faccie sedici, ed a faccie otto net drento, e dalle cappelle in su, faccie otto medesimamente. " antonio di tuccio manetti, "vita di filippo di ser brunellesco, " in divo save lli , la rotonda def brunelleschi: storia e documenti (firenze : esuvia edizioni, 1992), 45. 25. "ad dei reverentiam et communis honorem ... " in alto notabile per la construzione de/la rotonda degli angeli (16 aprile 1434). manetti, 41 . 26. and literally everybody else up to the twentieth century-myself includedwould see, or repeat, sixteen. the consensus was that the building was extraordinary, bizarissimo, in vasari 's words. 27 . if this building, as it is believed, was intended to have pronounced structure and austere ornamentation both inside and out, it is appropriate to present it as double-faced, with an almost interchangeable inside and out that might be comparable to reversible (doublefaced) garments. exemplifying the effect of the back wall of arena chapel david leatherbarrow raised another interesting issue-an "inside front." 7 the history of entrapment the history of entrapment: a reading of architecture’s 2-d accessory john dickson by reference to a classical style low-relief building facade in auckland, this paper gives a reading of architecture’s origins supported by connection with the adventures of mowgli and daniel. concealment of three dimensionality, inherent in the device of the trap, is advanced as a crucial accessory to architecture . interstices 4 the history of entrapment: a reading of architecture’s 2-d accessory 1 just as the wallet, pen, chequebook, and jewellery are the body’s power accessories, the signet ring of old, from which one’s individuality, signature, stamp of authority, patent, intentions is derived, so is the two dimensional ornamented surface for architecture. the rest body and building is that dependable or disposable, conforming to function, conventional, lovable vernacular of matter, of which some save the bones (seeing structure as the essence) others the skin (parchment). all is ultimately water soluble although parchment, so esteemed by lawyers, unlike paper, is resistant to this process.1 it is toward parchment that the architectural accessory of the 2-d ornamental surface is inclined. the concern of this paper is with the design that is placed upon it; and with the power of the 2-d ornamented surface, architecture’s key accessory, for subordinating 3-d building. some architects, unlike alberti, are uneasy about the tension between the 2-d and 3-d aspects of architecture.2 architecture’s 2-d aspect is surely part of its repertoire despite culturist scorn of ancient egypt, archaic greece, byzantium, and asia’s sophisticated use of 2-d surface and low relief as a representational device which makes schemas of ornament an archive of design and culture. the 3-d aspect of architecture can get out of hand. perhaps the 2-d/3-d issue, associated in this paper with the accessory issue, is concerned with the conflict between realism and poetry.3 as an example i will refer to what i would like to call ‘the most beautiful building in auckland’ but if i d o t h i s i w i l l a l i e n a t e a l l m y c o l l e a g u e s . i w i l l instead refer to the selected building as one of auckland’s architectural good lookers. the building, the pacific forum line, i assume faces custom street but it is the rear facade facing north onto the britomart place bus terminal t h a t i w i s h t o discuss ( fig 1). this facade is beautiful because of its two dimensionality. in its texture and colouring it is like a painting. painting, being a higher, finer art, gives access to beauty in a way that eludes most buildings on account of building being unavoidably coarse, site-bound and circumstantial. the pacific forum line facade, by means of its composition and ornamental scheme in low relief, is clearly a representation of a 3-d building, both of a simple and grand kind, and one unlike the actual building within the facade. a simplistic three-fold analysis of classical building refers first to the plinth/base, secondly to the shaft, and thirdly to the capital/entablature/roof pediment. speculation, treatises, and investigation concerning the first building from whence this 3-d classical scheme has been derived, and concerning the notion itself, have been largely preoccupied with the primitive woodwork of the upper two zones for reasons which wigley, following derrida, has probed.4 these studies tend to focus on the 3-d building itself and not on its accessory 2-d role. as accessories, designs in the form of textiles, parchment and ceramic have been bundled up quite literally in history’s silk road baggage and have stayed with us, whatever our existential journeying, ever since. that these 2-d designs are, on a huge scale, sometimes laid over buildings, like the festival thankas of bhutan and tibet, is not immediately apparent to, nor appreciated by, all. modernism, particularly, has protested against this practice. one can safely say that the pacific forum line facade is so straightforward in its use of the classical scheme of ornament that it, like others nearby, is in touch with, and depicts the first, original building (a house perhaps). by means of its accessory ornament this facade gives access to the very moment of building’s invention. the pacific forum line thus wears a blueprint plastered onto its face; a mask perhaps, but with the pathos of the whitened circus clown, and with the bathos of the inevitable custard pie. interstices 4 the history of entrapment: a reading of architecture’s 2-d accessory 2 together with many other auckland buildings and interiors this facade spans the entire history of the human accessory architecture. the two key human accessories building and clothing (particularly women’s dresses) both intimately body related are joined by a third; in our time the motor vehicle. motor vehicles, and buildings for them, dominate the environs of the pacific forum line. the surrounding buildings are aggressively three-dimensional. it requires concentration in such a context to focus on the surface ornament of the pacific forum line which brings to our attention a wider architectural repertoire. on closer inspection it can be seen that three buildings are implied by the facade; a short one thoroughly keyed-in to a basement; a second tall one on top of the first with a secondary hesitation within its attenuated pilasters; and a third, short one, on top (fig 2). thus the facade oscillates between the simple and the grand. each building, short or tall, repeats to a degree the classical threefold scheme of base/shaft/entablature within itself and in conjunction as a whole. for europeans, the cellar or crypt is a much taken for granted vernacular aspect of building, of little visual consequence perhaps; useful for effacing certain people and things, not least for security. in new zealand, thanks to a literary tradition of which the late professor sir keith sinclair was an exponent we are tuned to 3-d ‘hack’ and ‘dig’ cues in both literature and architecture.5 t h u s , f o r u s , the digging o f a basement, something we haven’t bothered with much, takes precedence over its imaginative aspect. it is easy therefore for a new zealander to grasp that the pacific forum line’s first ground-level, short, simple building atop a basement with windows poking through a plinth, is basically a h o l e d u g i n t h e g r o u n d a n d a s s u c h i n d i c a t e s t h e first building that ever was. this invention is much more basic than caves or twig shelters, for these just happen to be there. a hole in the ground excites, and requires concentration and caution, as the poet robert creeley has observed: i could look at an empty hole for hours thinking it will get something in it, will collect things. there is an infinite emptiness placed there.6 the first building/house was undoubtedly a hole dug in the ground.7 and with death ritual the first became the last. i think it is simpler to think of the necropolis as the last house not the first as lewis mumford has suggested.8 w h e n d i g g i n g a h o l e f o r shelter, as evicted irish tenants did in the frozen ground in the 19th century during the potato famine, a boon is the spoil. this piled around the hole lessens the depth of dig for head height. although a parapet from inside, outside this spoil c r e a t e s t h e s t u b o f a w a l l o r ‘mastaba’ the sitting bench as it has become known in arab egypt. there are perhaps batter slopes and gaps for doors; the pacific forum line h a s o n e s u c h ; t o which roman mythology is sensitive, by means of allusions to ploughing digging a hole for a city and turning up a sod city wall, understanding the gap where the plough was carried (portare) across to make the city gate. one might instead step up and over the mastaba and then down into the hole. steps inside are made with a bit of left behind spoil. solid steps against a wall excite, even in our time, memories of this ‘first house.’ i a m i n c l i n e d t o t h e v i e w t h a t t h e f i r s t h o u s e a h o l e i n t h e g r o u n d w a s i n s p i r e d b y t h a t d u g t o trap animals. somehow it became known that it was snug down there.9 life at that time was otherwise very open. closure had not quite been invented. snug, but after the catch risky. someone, like daniel, had to go down with the animals. here is the sacramental aspect of house for those who want it. this line of thought crystallised for me when i recently re-read rudyard kipling’s jungle book.10 mowgli can’t bear to sleep in a house in the village; h e h a s t o s l e e p o u t s i d e ; h e t h i n k s t h e h o u s e i s a trap. this is all legions away from the expansive openness and repetition of the paleolithic paintings of animals on the walls of caves. architecture is thus the history of human entrapment. i believe the facade of the pacific forum line records this. after digging a hole, when it is a trap, over it is placed concealment as false ground. this false ground which conceals the hole is the twodimensional surface. concealment is thus the inherited function of the two-dimensional facade. that is to say its function is to conceal a 3-d reality. this very facility of concealment becomes a means whereby the 2-d ornamented facade can be read; its 3-d subject detected, swept, cleared, appreciated, defused; disentangled from that within and then approached with caution lest aggressive 3-d power residual within be nevertheless unleashed.11 when the hole is a house its covering is a roof. this function of roof is concealed also when the hole is a trap. (tego, texi, tectum = to cover, protect, to make secret, bury, conceal; tegula = roof, roofing tile; interstices 4 the history of entrapment: a reading of architecture’s 2-d accessory 3 teges = mat, rug, covering; tectum = roof, shelter, dwelling; tector = plasterer.) all construction above the hole and its spoil can be understood to derive from the roof. roofing over the hole with whatever is to hand sticks, leaves, logs, mud, stones is inevitably arranged for a house to achieve a crucial ventilating and observation gap or strip between elements, and within their thickness, on top of the mastaba w a l l . modernism with its celebration of threedimensionality featured this strip; it can be observed in the work of new zealand’s dr richard toy as a clerestory strip sometimes merely glass set between rafters as well as the ubiquitous glazing strip above interior partitions in modern design.12 lighting often takes precedence over ventilation in these examples as they are not actually holes in the ground. the holocaust memorial hall, yad vashem, at jerusalem is a dramatic interior evocative of this hole in the earth scheme. in classical design this gap strip is the frieze; one breathes through it, sees through it, and hears through it even if the hole is deep; even when inside the strip is trompe-l’oeil painted plasterwork13 ( figs 3 , 4 ). in egypt a continuous visual record of the convention of the frieze derived from archaic and vernacular building can be traced from the 4th millennium bc to roman times. this is a self conscious alignment of a decorative scheme with a 3d vernacular celebrated for its archaic significance indicating a primeval time of the gods and their first abode of which the temple is a representation in stone. 14 the pacific forum line building’s first short register indicates this frieze zone at ground level by means of steel barred basement windows reminiscent of an egyptian kheker f r i e z e ; a n d a l s o a b o v e t h e mastaba wall by means of a generous uplifted zone which involves by implication the imposition of posts, rather like trajan’s kiosk at philae. by this means an airy pavilion is created above the hole in the ground, perhaps with its own floor concealing both the hole below and its role as the hole’s roof; or perhaps remaining open aloft as a high belvedere lantern as at the crossing of english cathedrals. a roof/floor directly on top of the mastaba wall provides the plinth and terrace of the classical scheme. by means of timber or masonry this airy pavilion can be extended vertically as at ephesus, baalbek, persepolis and with buttresses at beauvais. whether constructed of ashlar masonry or of fragrant, perfumed timbers as in turkey’s early mosques and persia’s halls of paradise at isfahan, as noted by warren and mahoney’s citibank centre within sight of the pacific forum line, these pavilions have excited the senses throughout history.15 a pavilion of this kind is the dazzling intimation of the central register of the pacific forum line building. of course the actual solid building within, with its tiers of windows, is at odds with this conception which prefigures late twentieth century curtain wall buildings. the facade excites the presence of an immense gilded cage, a single shaded volume, with glinting profiles set over a hole in the ground; like paris’ exquisite s. chapelle. this auckland facade is unbelievably airy to the casual eye. pilaster capitals hint of archaic twiggery and leafage. on top is another pavilion rather stubby. this accessory f a c a d e t h u s r e f e r s t o w h a t w a s ; t o t h a t which is elsewhere; to that which isn’t, enlivening thereby that which is. there is thus a sense in which freestanding building, of which the pillared shrine is an exemplar, is constructed within the conjunction of hole and roof. coomaraswamy has drawn attention to timber building, particularly roofs, built within indian caves with use of wall brackets for supports. it could even be that paleolithic cave paintings express the intention of transforming the natural cave into an ‘architectural’ conception in rejecting its closed wall aspect by painting the fauna of the open landscape as a ‘frieze’ zone and thereby accepting the floor and roof aspect of the cave itself.16 attempts to trace the evolution of building from a simple closed hut, cryptless and with full height walls, seem in this light to be perhaps rather misguided. coomaraswamy has attempted to do this for indian architecture, being convinced that the fully developed, complex indian temple had such an origin. neither meister, coomaraswamy’s posthumous editor, nor rykwert in their discussion of coomaraswamy’s work seem to entertain the possibility that all building is substantially a roof complementing the pit, despite coomaraswamy’s recognition of the stacking of roofs (sikhara) as the generator of the temple tower form incorporating multiple eave/clerestory zones between the roofs.17 the development of construction is largely the ‘raising of the roof’. it may be that the simple closed wall hut is not by any means an origin but rather a constructed ‘twin’ of the pavilion and understood as an alternative tradition; or perhaps even an adaption of the constructed pavilion made whenever the ‘eggshell’ hole and earthworks system was put aside. interstices 4 the history of entrapment: a reading of architecture’s 2-d accessory 4 certainly, in the history of building, a tension exists between these twins. when the constructed pavilion is revealed, above or outside the pit, the inner secret of architecture is manifest, as by the greek temple and portico. coomaraswamy has shown how in indian temple architecture the closed hut is then inserted or re-inserted into the otherwise open composition. to conclude i will refer to a nearby building with the same scheme but in a grandiose manner viz the ferry building on quay street auckland 18 ( f i g 5 ) . i think of this building as the morning after daniel was thrust down into the lion pit, when the king came to see what had become of daniel, as if painted by veronese, accompanied by an oratorio by handel. one can observe king darius, at the break of dawn, with his family and retinue sweeping between the pavilion’s massive sandstone columns on the uplifted terrace sealed with his own signet ring. the building’s brick interior dissolves in the imagination leaving a tented pavilion over the pit. as in 17th century turkish pavilions there are retiring rooms with fireplaces. this terrace is set on top of a mastaba wall constructed of coromandel tonalite/granite, like heaps of grey shingle beside a hole in the road. from this airy, elevated platform, a rather stodgy persepolis, the court peers down to see to their amazement, and to darius’ relief, daniel down there alive, cosy with the lions. at road level one can see the thick arches through which the lions have been chased in and out as in the colosseum a t rome. like the pacific forum line there is another short pavilion on top. unlike at the colosseum one’s thoughts are not directed towards the horrible sequel when daniel’s accusers are thrown down into the pit and seized by the lions even before they reach the floor of the pit.19 denied concealment’s 2d accessory they are exposed to a grim 3-d reality. the whole show is noisy and spectacular. no wonder the byzantines once, and the eastern orthodox church still, enact this scenario of the first house as part of their liturgy. but this building of intrinsic power impressive as it is, on account of its coarse three-dimensional buffoonery to which architecture is prone, does not have the delicate accessory charm and subtle suggestion of the pacific forum line’s rear facade on britomart place. notes 1 “a parchment book lost in the thames was recently recovered completely intact. ‘water simply strengthens parchment, unlike paper. that is why several books have survived for more t h a n a thousand years.’ says wim visscher whose family have been making parchment and vellum since 1860.” including restoration of the doomesday book. r.u., “living national treasure: parchment maker” country life (november 24, 1994), p. 32-33. 2 auckland architect david mitchell is one of these. he scorns post-modern architecture for this reason; for its entertaining the 2-d surface as a key design element: “in 1980 michael graves had rendered the facade of the public service building in portland, us as a gigantic neoclassical collage barely related functionally to what was behind it. in one stroke he had granted a licence to reduce 3-d architecture to 2-d scenography.” david mitchell, “urban decline” architecture new zealand (january/february, 1995), p. 50-52. 3 “the richness and variety of the english school of landscape painters has resulted from the constant conflict between realism and poetry.” laure meyer, masters of english landscape (paris: pierre terrail, 1993), dustcover. 4 joseph rykwert, on adam’s house in paradise: the idea of the primitive hut in architectural history (new york: museum of modern art, 1972), mark wigley writes: “the invisible architecture of the crypt is always bound to a visible architecture ... furthermore, there is no architecture without crypt.” the architecture of deconstruction: derrida’s haunt (cambridge, massachusetts: m.i.t. press, 1993), p. 179. 5 “life, real life, was physical. t o l i v e w a s t o d i g , hack, hit, shove, sail, swim, kick.” k. sinclair, “life in the provinces: the european settlement” distance looks our way: the effects of remoteness on new zealand (auckland: university of auckland, 1961), p. 41. 6 robert creeley, “joy” the finger. poems 1966-1969 (london: calder and boyars, 1970), p. 23. 7 whilst holes in the ground are included as part of the origins of architecture by some writers they are not dwelt upon e.g. vitruvius, who mentions “others dug caves on mountain sides” and notes the trenches dug by phrygians who lived in open country. vitruvius, the ten books on architecture trans. m. h. morgan, (new: york: dover, 1960), p. 39-40. sir william chambers writing in the 1750’s dismisses such holes and other early devices as soon abandoned on account of their being “disgusting, d a m p a n d dark” rykwert, on adam’s house in paradise p. 70. 8 lewis mumford emphasizes the paleolithic cave sanctuary in the social development of place in the city in history: its origins, its transformations, and its interstices 4 the history of entrapment: a reading of architecture’s 2-d accessory 5 prospects (london: secker and warburg, 1961). 9 in australia near canberra i once saw a kangaroo, a large male, established in a hole it must have shaped for itself; he had his rear limbs and soft parts snug in the hole with his powerful ‘mastaba’ tail on the brink at the ready. his squeaky nose, eyes, and ears were lifted high like the communications masts on the mountain tops around canberra’s moist hollow. 10 “tiger! tiger! mowgli’s song” rudyard kipling, the jungle book (london: macmillan, 1st ed 1894). 11 “every apparently stable building presupposes such a concealed and unstable spacing that is itself a mechanism of concealment,” “but of seeing what it might say about such a hiding, seeing what it reveals about concealment, what it opens about closure, and so on. in the end, these are the architectural questions.” wigley, the architecture of deconstruction p. 179, 88. 12 an example is r.h.toy’s all saints’ church, (1957) ponsonby, auckland. p. shaw, new zealand architecture (auckland: hodder and stoughton, 1991), p. 153. more extreme examples by le corbusier are ronchamp chapel (1950-55) and the church of s. marie-de-la-tourette (1957-60). also the fosse ardeatine, (1945) rome by aprile et al g.e. kiddersmith, italy builds (london: the architectural press, 1956), p. 174-177. 13 william mason’s old government house (1856) auckland, now the university of auckland senior common room, has all these sense cues, visual, olefactory, auditory worked in relief plaster as an interior frieze; apollo/orpheus lyres alternate with garlands of fruit and flowers with ribbons fluttering in the breeze. shaw, new zealand architecture p . 3 4 . recent truncation of the ribbons on auckland university’s crest, in o r d e r t o m e r e l y m a k e t h e m less ornate, is an act of ignorance. once like the pennons at thebes, stirring in the air o f t h e god amon the invisible one, auckland university’s ribbons now indicate that the university has become an airless overcrowded zone. 14 egypt also introduced the concept of a building within a building as in tutankhamun’s concentric shrines whereby each, shorter than the one over it, provides a ventilating strip as a kheker frieze; and whereby solid interior walls are painted as the elevations o f a n a i r y pavilion. auckland graduate robert tse has recently located in china his family’s ancestral hall in which a strip of painted landscape is placed in exactly this frieze zone. robert tse, “on the way to ha leung,” (barch thesis: university of auckland, 1994). 15 “a clear division into base, middle and top was made.” ‘citibank centre, 23 customs street, auckland.’ warren and mahoney architects 1958-1989 (christchurch: warren and mahoney, 1989), p. 93. 16 ananda k. coomaraswamy, essays in early indian architecture e d . m i c h a e l w. meister, (new delhi: indira gandhi national centre for the arts and oxford university press, 1992.) 17 michael w. meister and joseph rykwert, “afterword: adam’s house and hermits’ huts, a conversation,” coomaraswamy, essays in early indian architecture 18 ferry building, (1912), quay street, auckland. architect alexander wiseman, in shaw, new zealand architecture p. 70. 19 “at the first sign of dawn he was up, and hurried off to the lion pit. as he approached the pit he shouted in anguished tones, ‘daniel, servant o f t h e living god! has your god, whom you serve so faithfully, been able to save you from the lions?’ daniel replied, ‘o king, live for ever! m y g o d s e n t h i s angel who sealed the lions’ jaws, they did me no harm, since in his sight i am blameless, and i have n e v e r d o n e y o u a n y w r o n g e i t h e r , o k i n g . ’ the king was overjoyed, and ordered daniel to be released from the pit. daniel was released from the pit, and found to be quite unhurt, because he had trusted in his god. the king sent for the men who had accused daniel and had them thrown into the lion pit, they, their wives and their children: and they had not reached the floor of the pit before the lions had seized them and crushed their bones to pieces.” “daniel” 6.17-25 the jerusalem bible (london: darton, longman and todd, 1966). "the plan sites the office building parallel to the motorway across the maas river, which is taken as a point of orientation and verification. the design contains a parking deck which slices through the site like a wedge and forces the building upward, so to speak, freeing it of its weight. "the building itself consists of two wings shifted out of alignment, one of which juts across the road linking the sphinx-ceramique grounds to the randwijck area of maastricht. in this way the building marks the intersection of two roads. a pedestrian ramp underscores the link between building and intersection. accordingly the building should be treated as a function of the road." 1 "as in the classic temples and in minimalist art, arets' work is not a mimetic, literal obedience to the guidelines of the site but rather an interpretation and link with it; it has no meaning outside the point where it is inserted. 'we want our buildings to merge into the existing context, but at the same time, to be flexible and open to changes,' arets has written. for this purpose, as greg lynn explains, arets uses two tactics: disappearance and foldability. both movements are expressed with the materiality of skins that act like alabaster-half transparent, half translucent, like a chameleonic reflection of the surroundings .. .. "2 "architecture may be considered a desire for purity, a striving for perfection. the principal color white marks a process in which the undecidable is respected; it is not a question of meaningful or meaningless. "the whiteness of newly fallen snow in the morning light, the white of perfect skin, the white paper on which the design will be sketched-white is everywhere and may be considered the color of origin and beginning. white is the color of the between: between conception and execution, between unblemished and defiled, between innocence and seduction, between virginity and marriage."3 122 i -----~ -l--!--• i i i -· i ceramique office building maastricht, the netherlands wielarets 0 .lf»,"h'fnlg vah~ ll.hm..lol l.ametllil ( dotlkellgl!ijs) ·l(objnvnl'l'i'eswtnl'i:eoceoajl(ctlooia.'ftl..d)('noiwtgiujs) schaal; 1/200 -l'ltua9 8£too(zwaat)paj'>'eel~~fnl!l'.llfflstek>i datum: 26.06. 1 995 llljtstun (lwnitl.iet zwajit£v0£gen) ill -im betrett: zuidgeveukleurenschema blok 36 ceramique te maastrlcht wilma vastgoed bv schaal: 11200 datum: 26.06.1995 l betreft : noorogeveukleuaenschema i blok 36 ceramjoue te maastricht ! i wilma vastgoed bv i ~,..-'lb:..l:ae'fs-~fllli)cuttskllijlft'trn'tlcr~~~-~-~l "architecture is therefore a between, a membrane, an alabaster skin, at once opaque and transparent, meaningful and meaningless, real and unreal. to become itself architecture must lose its innocence; it must accept a violent transgression. it can only become part of the world by entering into marriage with its surroundings .... "4 "fifty years ago technology brought us reality. now it is destroying it. the design of the thirties already contributed to a series of man-made communications; today architecture has reach the status of an interface. it is architecture's task to mediate between man and everything that befalls him. "5 "when you talk about 'skin', for example, most people quickly translate the skin as a fai;ade or as the surface of the body which has an inherent 'thinness'. my idea in alabaster skin was to explain that skin actually involves 'thickness', even when you talk about the skin of a city, its political and economical circumstances and its culture . however when you talk about the building in the city, the thickness has to do with the air in front of the building, the building itself and the air behind it. the fai;ade is no longer just a kind of representational act but has a multiplicity, a complexity which goes beyond the first reading. you are no longer looking at the human body just in terms of the skin but also in terms of the movement of the skin ... "6 1. "ceramique office building," el croquis 85 (1997): 100. 2. josep marfa montaner, "wiel arets: european architecture after postmodernism," el croquis 85 (1997): 30. 3. wiel arets, "an alabaster skin," d: columbia documents of architecture and theory, vol. 2 (1993): 35. 4. wiel arets, "an alabaster skin," 36. 5. wiel arets, "an alabaster skin," 39. 6. wiel arets in dominic papa, "a conversation with wiel arets," el croquis 85 (1997): 15. 123 the stamp of architecture the stamp of architecture: post-marking the architectural drawing peter wood interstices 4 the stamp of architecture: post-marking the architectural drawing 1 the professional view of architectural drawing is perhaps that best expressed by edwin lutyens, who, when writing to the lady emily lytton in 1897, declared his exasperation at the misunderstood nature of the architectural drawing: i was not cross only very dictatorial and impressive. they never realise that a working drawing is merely a letter to a builder telling him precisely what is required of him and not a picture wherewith to charm an idiotic client.1 lutyens expresses a belief common throughout the practice of architecture that the drawing serves as a neutral bridging device that allows the architectural idea to be transformed into the architectural project. typically this transaction is seen as a projection and is often loosely referred to as a translation.2 implicit in such an assumption is the hypothesis that the surface of the drawing corresponds in some direct way to the surface of a building. robin evans has noted this “through the miracle of the flat plane, lines transfer with alacrity from paper to stone and the wall becomes a petrified drawing, inscribed or embossed to lesser or greater degree.”3 in this way the architectural drawing is described, through inscription and embossing, as a particular type of relief carving, as a mark or stamp.4 architectural drawing is simultaneously the marking and stamping of architecture into drawing, perhaps a drawing towards this stamp (fig 1). evans conditions this transfer as ‘simple’ and ‘primitive,’ but not without some sense of appropriateness to the origins of drawing. this origin is generally understood to derive from pliny the elder as a function of projection and tracing. the occasion is initiated by butades’ daughter who is about to be separated from her lover. placing a lamp in front of the young man she drew around the profile cast on the wall behind. butades then pressed clay onto the silhouette to produce a relief of the young man’s face.5 this moment is at once one of drawing and of stamping. the young man is a soldier being sent to another part of the empire, he is literally being posted (fig 2) and it is for this reason that butades provides the relief. without the posting of the soldier there exists no reason for the action of drawing so that we may say casually that drawing and posting already define each other at this point of origin (fig 3). in this way all postings are to some extent a drawing, a drawing out, or drawing towards, just as all drawing must contain an element of the post in order to satisfy some moment of transfer, or translation. but this genesis also contains an inevitability of loss, and death. butades draws the profile of his daughter’s lover so that she need not forget both who he is, and who he was, a condition concerned with locating place and time and motivated by the prospect of his loss. without this drawing the soldier suffers an inevitable death at his new posting, a death through posting (fig 4). represented in this way the soldier is relegated to an action of memory, but this too is an act of dissolution, a separation through time and space. the relief of the soldier is, in fact, a death mask (fig 5). this original drawing, the proto-type of the architectural drawing, marks the occasion of a crime as butades, knowing of the soldier’s posting, seals his fate with a particular type of stamp (fig 6), a die. butades is an accessory to the soldier’s premeditated death where the drawing marks the site of a murder. this he does with relief, or more specifically a relief, a device capable of leaving an impression or imprint, it is a stamp that makes a mark, but significantly this is an ornamental mark (fig 7 ).6 the memory of the departing soldier, of his posting, is etched into memory, a drawing towards and simultanously away from the memory of contact. as the origins of architectural drawing this story serves to point out the distance that occurs between the mark and its referent, a distance so wide that it may almost be criminal (fig 8). alberto perez-gomez has described the distance between architectural drawing and building as having always been opaque and ambiguous; because of this drawing is erroneously understood as a tool of reduction (fig 9). he notes: interstices 4 the stamp of architecture: post-marking the architectural drawing 2 the original architectural ideas were transformed into universal projections that could then, and only then, be perceived as reductions of buildings, creating the illusion of drawing as a neutral tool that communicates unambiguous information, like scientific prose.7 seen as a device of reduction the architectural drawing begins to exhibit the attributes that claude levi-straus8 reserves for the miniature ( fig 10). he contends that the illusion of the miniature is not only a projection of the object but it actually constitutes an experiment with an ‘original’ (fig 11). as a reductive tool the architectural drawing attempts the illusion of the miniature, producing a projective facsimile of the architectural project (fig 12). seen in this way the drawing is other to its own self by providing a representative moment of itself, essentially it provides a souvenir signature of its own originality. the architectural drawing makes a promise towards its own origins, and in doing so invites a search for this origin. thus the architectural drawing is a mark of desire, and a souvenir of this affinity (fig 13). in a discussion on the souvenir susan stewart comments, the souvenir speaks to a context of origin through a language of longing, for it is not an object arising out of need or use value; it is an object arising out of the necessarily insatiable demands of nostalgia (fig 14).9 as the object of an architectural nostalgia the drawing records desperate longings; the idea for its project, the architect for the building, the daughter of butades for her lover, and the mark for the signature. each nostalgic desire introduces a corruption that marks a deficiency of transfer to reveal dissolute practices. the drawing’s desire for the building, like that between a daughter and her lover, reveals a tenuous thread of connection reaching beyond patriarchial control. the drawing remains firmly the tool of the traditionally masculine architect, and is thereby the tool of a masculine desire, but one operating within a domestic tradition (fig 15). butades’ daughter, in longing for her departing lover prefigures a drawing in, or drawing of, approved desire. the souvenired profile is a stamp of approval (fig 16) that delineates the carnal nature of desire as domestic rather than the threat of the foreign. similarly the architectural drawing delineates between the submissive domestication of architecture and the constructed fabrications of building. the architectural drawing is simultaneously an architectural stamp capable of that interiorising that which is exterior to itself. the stamp is a mark capable of domestication which it achieves by inflicting a nostalgic provision for a simplified object of household origins, it provides the personal signature of the birthmark. quoting stewart again, because the world of the souvenir offers transcendence to the viewer, it may be seen as a miniaturised one, as a reduction in physical dimensions corresponding to an increase in significance, and as an interiorization of an interior.10 in this way the architectural stamp as a souvenir provides a reduced and interiorised view of architecture where representative attributes are substituted for the work itself. further, this interiorised view makes explicit a distancing of the familiar from the experienced. this is contained within a familiar and intimate environment. it is domesticated through separation (fig 17). concludes stewart, each representational sign is a kind of postcard serving to describe without ever capturing; one side always obscuring the other. the postcard initiates a distancing from, and construction of, an exotic origin by positioning itself within a field of difference. thus it represents the representation and the mortality of the represented (fig 18). but within the subject’s desire, to experience mortality, is issued the simultaneous desire to transcend death, to produce a representation with no referent, “each sign as a postcard from the land of the dead, and on the other side, the longing mark that is the proper name.”11 the postcard is a signature from the land of the dead, it is a death certificate that announces mortality upon receipt and as such it is both of life and death, and between life and death. it marks the borderline of life and death in the text. the representative souvenir signals, through its reductive signature, the existence of an original, authentic event. but this moment, this line, is at once broken, dotted, it gives itself up to the fatality of desire. no, the very idea of destination includes analytically the idea of death, like a predicate (p) included in the subject (s) of destination, the addressee or the addressor. and you are, my love, unique.12 the unique maintains a singular address by readdressing the question of difference to maintain its own solitary outpost, complete with the corrupted finality that absence implies. drawing, maintains stanley allen, marked with this sign of absence, is endlessly directed toward the desire of origin, or an original desire, which is thwarted as the object of architectural drawing is not prior, but immanent (fig 19). states allen: it is difference, rather than a system of correspondences, which makes possible the translations between drawing and building ... absence implies purity; architectural drawing is fundamentally impure. it carries a shadow which is translated across scale as the trace of the author.13 interstices 4 the stamp of architecture: post-marking the architectural drawing 3 the trace of the author, the author’s proper name, survives the process of translation unscathed so that the name of the drawing’s author is always attached to the drawing and the project, whether substantive or speculative. likewise the architectural stamp remains attached to the ‘truth’ of an original drawing despite the indiscriminate reduction and miniaturising that portrays all building as the same size (fig 20, 21). paradoxically, the hybridising of representation and fiscal value, that threatens the drawing’s primary value of architectural representation, evokes the mixing and reassembly that nietzche reserved for the intuitive rather than the necessary a condition justified by the concept of ‘truth.’14 according to nietzche: the truths ... are illusions which are no longer recognised as such; metaphors which have been used up, which have lost their sensual power; coins which have lost their face and are no longer valued as coins but only as pieces of metal. 15 in the same way the illusion of the architectural stamp retains the ‘truth’ of postage that challenges definitions of the stamp or the architectural drawing as only pieces of paper. that the stamp remains architectural is the responsibility of the signature attached to it. this illusion of truth is contextualised by the accessorised presence of the architect. the architectural signature is contractually bonded to the surface of the drawn mark, indelibly inscribed into the surface of the stamp ( fig 22). the contractual letter is already drawn up between the mark and architecture, a state remarked upon by vitruvius, and so that in drawing up contracts the interests of both employer and contractor may be wisely safe-guarded. for if a contract is skilfully drawn, each may obtain a release from the other disadvantaged.16 the contractual state of the architectural stamp provides for a promise of release. it inscribes into the letter of the architect the contractual signature of emancipation but conditions this against a promise of mutual obligation. but the drawn inscription, woven into the face value of architecture by a masculine hand defies mutual agreement. rather, following the action of butades the inscribed mark is subject to a masculine hierarchy (fig 23). andrea kahn argues that the action of drawing is more than a simple inscription of building into paper; rather, drawing provides for a structuring of architectural knowledge in which the drawing itself is a site of location, analogous to the site of building, and which can define architecture in its own terms. writes kahn, “whether explanatory or exploratory, drawing as both verb and noun is an inscription of architecture, an interpretation open to interpretation.”17 inscription then is also a mode of production that not only structures but actively restructures architectural knowledge, it continually re-draws the contractual obligation between addressee and addressor, but it does so in a masculine model. following his reading of plato’s “republic,” derrida has this to say of the inscription, inscription is ... the production of the son and at the same time the constitution of structurality (fig 24).18 the drawing, from the original relief by butades, is always masculine, and of a particular kind of reproductive masculinity that defies biological sense to re-present its own self. it is necessarily accompanied by a ‘constitution of structurality’ as it is the constitutional condition of inscription that ensures its own survival. butades, following the profile of his daughter’s lover, inscribes not his daughter, nor her lover, rather, it is the name of butades that pliny passes down. in this way butades, and pliny, both successfully ensure their own masculine parthenogenesis by authorising the truth of their own recounted experiences. pliny’s story of butades is constitutionally added to itself through the action of repetition so that it supplements itself with its own truth, it becomes its own accessory throwing into doubt its own truths. continues derrida: the disappearance of the face or the structure of repetition can thus no longer be dominated by the value of truth. the true and the untrue are both species of repetition. and there is no repetition possible without the graphics of supplementarity, which supplies, for the lack of a full unity, another unit that comes to relieve it, being enough the same and enough other so that it can be replaced by addition.19 every architectural drawing provides for a repetition of the original drawing (fig 25), extending through a perverse truth the contractual obligation of the architectural drawing to accessorise architecture (fig 26), which it does by assigning the reproductive signature to the drawing. the drawn signature then constitutionally organises the institution of architecture in a masculine state. constitution, derrida reminds us, is an act of institutionalising, and therefore so too is the signature which maintains a link with the instituting act (fig 27).20 indeed the founding act of an institution has to maintain within itself the mark of signature. the uniqueness of the signature is that it gives powers and rights ‘in the name of’ as the signature invents the signer, “it gives birth to itself, as free and independent subject, as possible signer, this can only hold in the act of the signature.”21 the signature becomes a point of interstices 4 the stamp of architecture: post-marking the architectural drawing 4 boundary that demarcates transgressions beyond the institution of legitimate architectural representation. to deviate outside this institutional programme is to violate the constitutional contract so that the unsanctioned signature reverts to primal shadow or trace rather than legitimate mark ( fig 28). thus the signature distinguishes between the living and the dead by assigning contractual value to the architect rather than the building. delineated in such a way the signature allows for only the legitimate or the illegitimate, condemning any transgression between the two as criminal.22 following butades, the crime of the architectural stamp takes place between the moment of perpetration, of inscription and marking, and that of its representation, its stamp. further, the crime is defined through, and drawn by, this relationship of marking/birth and stamping/death (fig 29). notes derrida, between birth and death, the spacing of the between marks at once the distance and the link, but the link according to a kind of distension.23 this ‘dis-tension’ derrida accords to the presence of in the between of the very being of dasein,24 “‘before’ any biological determination ... the link thus enter-tained, held or drawn between, over or through the dis-tance between birth and death.”25 the ‘dis-tension’ opens up a structural flaw that allows a drawing to cross between birth and death in a masculine hand (fig 30).26 here derrida introduces the figure of geschlecht as that which passes on from one genre to another, from generation to generation.27 this continued genealogical presence despite its masculine precedence is not made possible though by an action of projection, but rather through one of throwing. notes derrida, “dasein is geworfen:28 that means that before any project on its part it is thrown.”29 the sublime creative moment of conception too is characterised by geworfen, towards a throwing up that reveals the interiorised contents of existence. likewise the tale of the original drawing reveals butades, first and foremost a potter, actually ‘throwing’ the profile as he would a pot. in such a way butades is able to become individually fertile, throwing out from within an immaculate masculine offspring (fig 31). through the action of this throwing, or throwing up, the nature of drawing and existence are brought together. to make the mark of drawing is also to proclaim oneself as present and distinct, but it is to do so within an androgynous male tradition where the mark is always of birth, and where it remains as a birthmark. immutably inscribed onto the body the birthmark is immediately both attached to and inseparable from the body’s surface, it is thrown onto the body from within and stamps each surface as a unique extension of the same (fig 32). this original marking provides for a signature of difference. butades describes his daughter’s lover through his difference from his own self, an action indebted to surface and yet set in relief. butades, the original draftsman, transgresses between the visual fixation of the birthmark, and the embossed signature of the death-mask (fig 33). it is exactly at this point of inflection, somewhere between the immaculate birth of an idea and its inevitable execution, that the criminal nature of the drawing exists. the drawing is postmarked as unlawful, illegally violating the contractual obligation of the signature. conceived of immaculately the drawing exists outside any institutionalising construction or marriage so that drawing is always unsanctioned and illegitimate (fig 34). the signature of such criminal activity, the postmark, is concurrently that bastard stamp of the tattoo, demarking illegitimate production and unrequited love. quoting jacques derrida, phila-tely then is love without, with/without marriage, and the collection of all stamps, the love of the stamp with or without stamped love.30 the postmark, inscribed indelibly into the paper skin of the stamp, invalidates the stamp through the corruptive applied permanence of the tattoo. this incised disfigurement remarks the already incised surface of the stamp with the terminal empirical condemnation of time and place. in this way the tattoo is actually a countersignature that calls attention to the conditions of origin and termination. states derrida, it all starts with the countersignature, with the receiver, with what we call the receiver. the origin of the work ultimately resides with the addressee, who doesn’t yet exist, but that is where the signature starts.31 we should recall here that the signature is not merely the writing down of a name but an act, the event of signing itself. 32 paradoxically the tattooed postmark, in claiming the inevitability of a birth and a death, reinscribes a moment of life, and of love, by proclaiming the immaterial instant between the two. through cancellation the postmark grants approval (fig 35). thus the postmark tattoo is a sign designed to express a paradoxical condition of both exclusion and inclusion, an exteriorising and an interiorising. in this way the origin of drawing does not lie solely in the inscriptive action of butades, rather, it is his daughter to whom we must seek an approval as it is to her that the work is addressed, or more explicitly, it is to her longing, or nostalgia, that the origin of drawing resides as the countersignature. it is the desire of this feminine other that politicises the inception of drawing. butades, unable to give up his daughter to her lover, throws himself into the young interstices 4 the stamp of architecture: post-marking the architectural drawing 5 man’s profile in an attempt to substitute his own desires for that of his daughter’s ( fig 36). inevitably such an incestuous perversion manifests itself in the work as the inscribed degenerate signature of the tattoo, postmarking the drawing as masculine (fig 37). but insidiously the tattoo disguises an already existent birthmark, solicitously covering it up. intimately inscribed within the drawing is the feminine desire for an absence, a mark of repressed production ( fig 38). the architectural drawing contains an essence of feminine desire concealed within it, encrypted and occult.33 it is this desire of butades’ daughter for her lover that countersigns the young soldier’s relief as the origin of drawing. the countersignature of desire is carried within the signature of the architectural drawing as the moment of addressee, of mortality, longing, of the mark.34 suppressed within the origins of drawing this desire is an unheard domestic violence, a silent voice speaking from behind the tattooed criminal (fig 39). edwin lutyens, in the final bed ridden weeks of his life, found his own voice failing due to the degenerative effects of bronchial cancer. during this time he wrote a letter to his wife, emily lytton, in which he asked the question, “can you hear my writing?”35 lutyens died soon after, surrounded by his architectural drawings. he was survived by his wife, one son, and four daughters. to my knowledge he was not tattooed. notes 1 edwin lutyens cited, lever and richardson the architect as artist (new york: rizzoli, 1984), p. 1. this axiom is commonly attributed to mies van der rohe who stated architectural drawings are ‘simply letters to contractors.’ 2 for an introduction to these arguments see stanley allen, “projections: between drawing and building,” a+u (1992), n. 259, p. 40-47; stanley allen, “on projection,” harvard architectural review (1993), v. 9, p. 122-137; robin evans, “architectural projection,” architecture and its image: four centuries of architectural representation, works from the canadian centre for architecture eds. eve blau and edward kaufman, (montreal: canadian centre for architecture, 1989), p. 19-35, robin evans, “translations from drawing to building,” aa files (1986), n. 12, p. 3-18. 3 evans proposes this in his discussion of the possibilities of projection in discussing an elevational drawing for the campanile of s.maria del fiore, florence. alternatively he proposes the drawing as guided directly, as quoted above, or, as using projection as ‘guide rails’ that allow some degree of manipulation without ‘emancipation.’ robin evans, “translations from drawing to building,” aa files (1986), n. 12, p. 8. 4 stamp: “to mark (paper or textile material) with a device either impressed in relief or intaglio, imparted to the surface by ink or pigment, or produced by both processes combined. also to impress (a device) on paper, etc. by means of a die or engraved plate.” the oxford english dictionary (oxford: clarendon press 1989), v. xvi, p. 483 5 pliny the elder, natural history: a selection ed. john f. healy, trans. john f. healy, (london : penguin books, 1991), p. 336. 6 the term stamp applies not only to the tool of stamping but also to the ornamental mark produced by it. 7 alberto perez-gomez, “architecture as drawing,” journal of architectural education (winter 1982), v. 36, n. 2, p. 3. 8 claude levi-strauss, the savage mind (chicago: the university of chicago press, 1968) 9 susan stewart, on longing: narratives of the miniature, the gigantic, the souvenir, the collection (durham and london: duke university press, 1993), p. 135. 10 stewart, on longing p. 144. 11 stewart, on longing p. 173. 12 jacques derrida, “envois,” the postcard: from socrates to freud and beyond trans. alan bass, (chicago and london: the university of chicago press, 1987), p. 33. 13 stanley allen, “projections: between drawing and building,” a+u (1992), n. 259, p. 41. 14 stephan meier, “to signify oneself! on lies in architecture,” daidalos (june 1983) n. 8, pp. 10-13, 1620. 15 f. nietzche cited, meier, “to signify oneself! on lies in architecture,” p. 20. 16 vitruvius, the ten books of architecture trans. morris hicky morgan, (new york: dover, 1960), p. 10. 17 andrea kahn, “disclosure: approaching architecture,” harvard architectural review (1992), n. 8, p. 4. emphasis added. kahn continues: “only when drawing is seen to inscribe its own architectural ground is it possible to accord it both a definitive role in shaping the conception of architecture and a substantive tectonic relationship to built form.” p. 18. interstices 4 the stamp of architecture: post-marking the architectural drawing 6 18 jacques derrida, “plato’s pharmacy,” dissemination trans. barbara johnson, (chicago: the university of chicago press, 1981), p. 161. 19 derrida, “plato’s pharmacy,” p. 168. 20 “the constitution and the laws of your country somehow guarantee the signature, as they guarantee your passport and the circulation of subjects and of seals foreign to this country, of letters, of promises, of marriages, of checks all of which may be given occasion or asylum or right.” jacques derrida, “declarations of independence,” trans. tom keenan and tom pepper. new political science (summer 1986), n. 15, p. 10. 21 derrida, “declarations of independence,” p. 10. 22 “the crime has taken place (and every hymen intervenes, like a crime, ‘between perpetration and the memory of it:’ here i draw a veil over ‘la double séance’), and its dissemination dissolves or absolves it in the crowd only by multiplying it incalculably.” jacques derrida, “living on: border lines,” trans. james hulbert. deconstruction and criticism ed. harold bloom et al (new york: seasbury press, 1979), p. 154. we should remember here that in greek and roman mythology hymen is “the god of marriage, represented as a young man carrying a torch and veil.” the oxford english dictionary v. vii, p. 549. hymen then is also a god of drawing, carrying as he does, the two devices of drawing, the torch to allow the projective practice of drawing, and the veil upon which the projection is made. but the hymen is also a signature of death, or more correctly a counter signature as the hymen gives life precisely to announce death. the death that is ‘given’ is always requested, demanded, by the one who receives it, and who immediately signs the death of the other, the other death in order to live-on (survivre). 23 jacques derrida, “geschlecht: sexual difference, ontological difference,” research in phenomenology (1983),v. 13, p. 77. 24 literally ‘existence’ or ‘presence.’ 25 derrida, “geschlecht: sexual difference, ontological difference,” p. 77. 26 we should remember here that accessory is originally linked etymologically to access; as in “coming to or into; coming into the presence of, or into contact with, approach, entrance.” the oxford english dictionary v. i, p. 72. 27 “within the path of his writings too, and the marked impression or inscription of the word geschlecht will not be irrelevant. that word, i leave here in its language for reasons that should become binding in the course of this very reading. and it is indeed a matter of ‘geschlecht’ (sex, race, family, generation, lineage, species, genre/genus) and not of the geschlecht; one will not pass so easily toward the thing itself (the geschlecht), beyond the mark of the word (geschlecht) in which, much later, heidegger will remark the ‘imprint’ of a blow or a stamp (schlag).” derrida, “geschlecht: sexual difference, ontological difference,” p. 65. 28 geworfen is the past participle of the word werfen in the sense ‘to throw:’ “ jdn ins gefängnis etc werfen, to throw somebody into prison etc. ... etw in den briefkasten werfen, to put something in the letter box;” collins german dictionary (glasgow: harper collins, 1991), p. 758. 29 derrida, “geschlecht: sexual difference, ontological difference,” p. 78. 30 derrida, “envois,” p. 56. 31 jacques derrida, “the spatial arts: an interview with jacques derrida,” deconstruction and the visual arts: art, media, architecture (cambridge and new york: cambridge university press, 1994), p. 19. 32 “the signature is something other than merely writing down one’s own name. it is an act, a performative by which one commits to something, by which one confirms in a performative way that one has done something that it is done, that it is i who has done it.” derrida, “the spatial arts,” p. 17. 33 etymologically the word ‘occult’ is used to mean hidden and refers explicitly to those lines “drawn in the construction of a figure, but not forming part of the finished drawing.” an obsolete usage describes “a dotted line.” the oxford english dictionary v.x, p. 680. 34 signature: “a person signs a document when he writes or marks something on it in token of his intention to be bound by its contents, commonly by subscribing his name. illiterate people commonly sign by making a cross.” osborn’s concise law dictionary ed. leslie rutherford and shelia bone, (london: sweet and maxwell, 1983), p. 305. 35 edwin lutyens cited, mary lutyens edwin lutyens: by his daughter (london: john murray, 1980), p. 282. interstices02.indb signature effects: john soane and the mark of genius helene furján but let the sacred genius of the night such mystic visions send, as spenser saw, when thro’ bewildering fancy’s magic maze, to the bright regions of the fairy world soar’d his creative mind. thomas warton, the pleasures of melancholy (1747) we have now conducted the reader, step by step, through the apartments on these two fl oors, appropriated to the reception of works of art, and may safely assert that no where within a similar extent does there exist such a succession of varied and beautiful scenery, so many striking points of view, so many fascinating combinations and contrasts — so much originality, invention, contrivance, convenience, and taste. john britton, the union of architecture, sculpture and painting (1827) today, the question of ’genius’, in architectural discourse, is, perhaps, associated more with the sciences, with what john maeda has referred to as “creative code” (2004). however, the persistence of an interest in ’signature effects‘ among contemporary architects, like frank gehry, peter eisenman and greg lynn, suggests older notions of genius persist. artistic genius has typically been associated with the romantic period, when, as a means to theorize the role of the author and the process of creation, the concept became legitimate within the discourses of art and architecture. its arrival signalled a moment in which design was no longer seen as a process of mimesis — the recombination of pre-existing material — but rather as an individual act of invention. architecture, in the romantic period, elaborated a complex defi nition of genius, tying innovation to its own version of form-fi nding; to aesthetic theories steeped in atmospherics, mood and effects; to politics, the politics of aesthetic and cultural discourse and the politics of the nation-state. all these concerns can be seen mobilized in the work of that quintessential romantic architect, john soane. this essay will explore late eighteenth and early nineteenth century aspects of genius, through the motives and motifs at play in soane’s work, focusing largely on the most idiosyncratic of his projects, his own house at 13 lincoln’s inn fields. soane’s house-museum was formally bequeathed to the british nation in 1833 and preserved by an act of parliament on soane’s death in 1837. work on the house and three adjacent lots began in 1792 and spanned the rest of his life, con interstices 07interstices 07 tinuing from developments at his country house in ealing, pitzhanger manor.1 lincoln’s inn fields was a hybrid in many ways. nested into the functioning domestic spaces of a cultivated urbanite was an architectural offi ce (in latter years a studio training apprentices); a museum, a room-scaled model case; an archive of drawings and folios; an extensive professional and scholarly library; an art gallery which transformed the walls into cabinets, interleaving the paintings in layers to maximize hang space; and a sequence of themed spaces, largely “gothick” in character and loaded with moody special effects. special effects, indeed, were mobilized throughout the house in complex spatial interpenetrations; in soaring triple height domes and fi ssures; in mirrored complexities and gleams; in colorized or gloomy atmospheres. these effects, picturesque and sublime in their aesthetic leanings, but also owing allegiance to popular spectacles in london at the time, were part of the panoply of techniques — and, indeed, technologies2 — deployed by soane to exhibit his ’genius’ as architect and choreographer of space. these techniques can also be found in soane’s other projects, notably in the domed spaces of the bank of england’s public offi ces, and his mysterious freemason’s hall. but it is in the house that they are most intensely engaged. showing off: soane was no less aware of the economic value of signature effects than today’s architects are. he was more than willing to mobilize his own houses as highly successful publicity machines, as others like the adams brothers and thomas hope had done before him, demonstrating, to students, peers, critics and potential clients alike, his ’genius‘ as a tag of marketability. the many visits, tours and parties conducted at both residences were intended to reveal, to infl uential clients and friends, soane’s architectural skills, to demonstrate his genius, originality and taste, as well as his ability to keep up with fashions. from the gothic scenes and intellectual banquets at pitzhanger, to the major public spectacles staged at no. 13 in 1825,3 to the design of the spaces themselves, signature effects were constantly used as marketing devices. ‘effect’, and its corollary, ‘affect’, were frequently used terms during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. ‘effect’ was the mark of production, it was the mark of the ‘hand’, the trace of artifi ce, of fabrication. ‘effect’ was also the ability of an artwork to produce an impression on the mind, to produce ‘affect’. in soane’s house, eighteenth century aesthetic theories were combined with a baroque theatricality adapted from piranesi. soane stage-managed a raft of technological possibilities to produce light and shade, scenography and setting, negotiating tensions between horizontal and vertical, as well as complex spatial manipulations of formal elements, to create a whole range of expressive effects. these effects — the production of a certain image, a staging, an atmosphere, certain qualities of light and shade, and so on — culminated, in the words of his friend, well-known archaeologist, john britton, in a space designed for “spectacle and display” (britton, 1827: 44); a theatre of effects designed to highlight and showcase his talent. the latter is signifi cant here. showcasing talent, that is, creativity, invention, style, design skill, was a controversial aim in the early nineteenth century. to privilege talent in this way was to mobilize a debate that moved the production of a work 1 for a more complete history of soane’s building and collecting activities, see thornton & dorey (1992); stroud (1996); feinberg millenson (1984 & 1987). 2 no. 13 lincoln’s inn fields was an early house to be fully plumbed and have a central heating system. 3 the house was opened three successive saturday evenings to some 900 invited guests to celebrate the acquisition of an egyptian sarcophagus. this was also an opportunity to show off the house, which the deployment of theatrical lighting, to interior and exterior, aided. for more on this event, see furján (2002). 5757 of art away from a mimetic act to a highly individualized act of creation, taken to its extreme in romantic theory under the concept of genius. soane’s house, as showcase, parallels the work of artists such as his friend, j. m. w. turner, who overturned dominant classical notions of self-effacement, leaving the traces of his ‘hand’, and his brush or palette knife, clearly legible. turner’s abstractions made explicit the difference between “natural effect and the imaginative reality of art” (gowing, 1966: 31). he was not content to have his work subsumed under the blanket of good taste, judged on how well it imitated nature or remained faithful to the existing rules of the genre. rather, he believed in the importance of creative genius, an innate ability which he saw as unique and unfathomable. like soane, he also saw himself located in a genealogy of great artists whom he frequently invoked in his paintings or their captions. the mark of the hand, the idiosyncratic detail or technique, indicated the ambitious subject behind it: creator, inventor. in soane’s house, then, the role of imagination was crucial. the theatrical nature of the rooms, as scenes and evocative settings, demonstrated the range and power of his imaginative faculties. britton noted this, and thus confi rmed soane’s stature, in a text he gave to soane as a christmas gift in 1824, on the completion of a suite of rooms in the basement, fi ctionally inhabited by soane as the monk ‘padre giovanni’. “the sinners [sic] offering at the shrine of st. john of soania”, professed his admiration for the “most potent, grave and reverend st. john” and paid homage to “the miraculous powers and potencies of that revered saint, which i had chosen for my father and mediator”.4 in soane’s style, as in turner’s, the emphasis on individuality worked against the grain of established tradition, by refusing a servile imitation of classicism, and insisting on the indelible mark of his own hand, his own particular genius.5 such inventiveness, a continual re-reading and re-invention of classical rules, was considered to be an example of bad taste (i.e. ‘improper’), because it broke the accepted rules of classical architecture.6 sir joshua reynolds, and other stalwarts, considered marks of authorship defects, and architectural theorists largely continued to assert that classicism involved the emulation of antique models and accepted conventions, not invention. in effect, architectural practice was to protect a status quo — an architect was to work within a tradition and pass on its rules to the future. in contrast, soane’s interest in an identifi able style, one that could point directly to its singular author, promoted an interpretive, inventive and highly individual approach to the traditions of architecture.7 4 soane museum archive, 7/10/8, 2. 5 for more on the attacks on soane’s style see schumann-bacia (1991). 6 such a resistance to imitation could already be seen in the french querelle over the same issue of imitation (the ancients) versus invention (the moderns). see perrault (1993). 7 it is also worth noting that part of soane’s re-evaluation of classicism was due to the infl uence of the picturesque and of romanticism; both had forced a revaluation of the accepted taste of the classical style. interstices 07 photographs by michael shepherd interstices 07 poetic genius: john summerson, noted architectural historian and theorist, and curator of the soane museum from 1945-1984, was most probably the fi rst to refer to “the soane style” which he regarded as highly distinctive and idiosyncratic: in 1792, when it arrives suddenly at maturity, there was not, anywhere in europe, an architecture as unconstrained by loyalties, as free in the handling of proportion and as adventurous in structure and lighting as that which soane introduced at the bank of england in that year (summerson, 1983: 9). summerson notes that much of that style had been formed under the infl uence of george dance, and that soane developed his own signature version by adding, “a novel handling of proportion, a highly personal mode of decorative emphasis and a tendency to arrive at solutions by unlimited, often bizarre, distortions of old themes” (summerson, 1983: 9). these traits included pendentive domes with lanterns, often dilating in diameter to all but swallow the springing arches, semi-circular arches screening hidden light sources, double height tribune spaces, coloured skylights, and complex sectional interpenetrations. for instance, the complexities of sculpted space for which soane has become famous, demonstrate, not an affi liation to style as genre — the following of precedent — but to space, conceived as an abstraction of solids and voids, as a site for morphological experimentation. georges teyssot argues that, for eighteenth century architects, abandoning the rules of classical architecture meant not a freedom from technique but a freedom for technique.8 likewise, writing of the sectional relationship between the gothic parlour and picture room above it at no. 13, john britton already pointed out that, “it would be utterly impossible to convey by a drawing, however well executed, any adequate idea of the singular effect thus produced” (britton, 1827: 41). he remarks on the originality and skill evidenced: we perceive what beautiful and novel effects may be attained by ingenious and tasteful contrivance — what rich and picturesque architectural scenery may be created within the most confi ned space … after witnessing what has been accomplished here, let no architect complain that private residences afford little scope for the display of originality 8 see teyssot (1978: 62). 5959 photographs by michael shepherd interstices 07 and fancy, or that striking effects cannot be produced on a small scale, or that picturesque beauty cannot be obtained, except at the expense of convenience (britton, 1827: 28-29). “singular effect” is critical. in defence of soane’s originality, britton acknowledged that some critics may have been of the opinion that, “he has occasionally allowed himself too much license”, but retorted that there was no reason “why architecture, which is purely an art of invention, should be more fettered or restricted in this respect than any other” (britton, 1827: 9). this was a reference to a commonly held opinion that painting, since it represented, was an art of imitation; sculpture was part imitation, part invention, as it isolated bodies from settings, stripped colour and was often paired with architecture; architecture and music, being the most abstracted from nature, were non-representational, and hence inventive arts. however, britton did caution against novelty for novelty’s sake and stressed that innovation required, “consummate judgment and the most refi ned taste” and could in itself be seen as “the touchstone of an architect’s ability; for it is exceedingly diffi cult to hit upon the due medium between servility and timidity on the one hand, or caprice and rashness on the other” (britton, 1827: 9). soane was against the “monotony and tame repetition” (soane, 1996: 605) of the prevailing neoclassical design method, as a blind copying of historical precedent, and he developed instead a method of invention that abstracted and preserved the effects of such styles.9 singularity was the product of an experimental technique derived from dance and the work of visionaries soane admired étienne-louis boullée, nicholas ledoux, j-b piranesi. it could also be found in the cult of novelty that took hold of theorists of the picturesque, as it appeared in the continuous references to novel effects made by barbara hofl and in her commentaries for soane’s privately printed descriptions of his house, or in britton’s earlier union of architecture, sculpture, and painting.10 in theories of the sublime and the picturesque, architecture turned into a theatre for special effects, characterised by the play of mass and void, of form, and of light, shade and atmosphere. for britton, soane’s house, especially the museum with its crypt and monkish apartments, aligned architecture with poetry: “we perceive here not merely the imaginative architect, but the poet, and are at a loss which most to admire, the originality or the beauty, the mystery or the intricacy of the conception” (britton, 1827: 6). in his 1830 description, soane himself noted an emphasis on the conjuring of “an almost infi nite succession of those fanciful effects which constitute the poetry of architecture”, notably through the use of picturesque devices (soane, 1830: 2).11 like many eighteenth century theorists of taste, aesthetics, or association, soane, when referring to poetics, used ‘fancy’ and ‘fanciful’ interchangeably with ‘imagination’. it wasn’t until coleridge wrote his biographia literaria in the early nineteenth century that fancy and imagination were distinguished from each other. drawing on aristotle, coleridge linked “the associating power” to memory and fancy, and kept them both distinct from reason and imagination (coleridge, 1817: vol. i, 104-05). in his theory, fancy was characterized by fi nitude, remaining inseparably linked to the store of impressions, memories and ideas of the perceiving subject’s sum of experiences (coleridge, 1817: vol. i, 296). in contrast, imagination was limitless; imagination was novelty and invention where 9 on the topic of the abstraction of styles to effects, see summerson (1983: 14); and teyssot (1978: 67). 10 “far above, and on every side, were concentrated the most precious relics of architecture and sculpture, disposed so happily as to offer the charm of novelty, the beauty of picturesque design, and the sublimity resulting from a sense of veneration due to the genius and the labours of the ‘mighty dead.’” hofl and, b. in soane, (1835/36: 37). 11 for more on this topic, see furján 1997. 61 fancy was mimesis, always beholden to the re-assemblage of precedent. for coleridge, imagination, “that syncretic and magical power”, is clearly the privileged faculty in the cultivation of artistic genius: “good sense is the body of poetic genius, fancy its drapery, motion its life, and imagination the soul that is everywhere and in each; and forms all into one graceful and intelligent whole” (coleridge, 1817: vol ii, 11-12). in strikingly similar terms, soane set out the combination of faculties necessary for the production of great architecture: “rich fancy and bold imagination; fl ights of powerful mind and magical genius” (soane, 1966: 619, emph. added). soane made explicit use of poetics in his architectural work, and evoked the term ‘poetry’ for its romantic and theatrical implications and associations. “like poetry, [architecture] presents a succession of varied pictures” (soane, quoted in bolton 1927: 100). recognizing these aims, isaac d’israeli was to describe the museum as a “built poem”.12 thus, the “poetry of architecture” is, in soane’s understanding, a combination of novelty, the picturesque, the sublime and poetic association. however, it is also evidence of that elusive quality, genius. soane wrote of his paper projects — his “architectural visions” — that they were the “wild effusions of a mind glowing with an ardent and enthusiastic desire to attain professional distinction” (bolton, 1927: 18). in 1818 william hazlitt wrote of the representation of objects distorted by the poetic imagination, thus immediately evoking the distortions of the convex mirror; that beloved of picturesque tourists (the claude glass), as well as the many that line the interiors of soane’s house (see furján, 1997). combining the mirror with the lamp, he further complemented the mimetic faculty with a reasoning and “emotional light”, in order to show that the artistic work is mediated, the product of the object and its contemplation, the work of the mind’s refl ection (quoted in abrams, 1971: 52-54).13 in this analogy, hazlitt brought together the two modes of composition that formed the basis of a romantic neo-classicism like soane’s the mirror of contemplation and mimesis, together with the emanating light of individual genius. the fi gure of the lamp, in hazlitt’s evocation, originates in notions of god and the human spirit fi gured as a fl ame (typically burning in the darkness of evil and disbelief). this romantic re-fi guration follows directly from the enlightenment conception of knowledge understood literally as enlightening, as the bright light of illumination that renders things clear and visible; except that here, it is the light of imagination, of creation, not of nature and reason. styling a nation, nationalizing a style: john gwynn, in london and westminster improved, described the question of “public magnifi cence” in architecture as “a national concern” for honouring the country’s distinction and its people’s genius, along with its culture’s refi nement of taste and manners (gwynn, 1766: 1-2). soane, in one of his royal academy lectures, linked magnifi cence to “national taste” and “national glory” through the notion of “character”, essentially a representational aspect of architecture, one he admitted is malleable: 12 letter from isaac d’isralei to soane, 14 august 1836, in bolton (1927: 529). 13 hazlitt is quoted from his essay on poetry in general. interstices 07 notwithstanding all that has been urged to the contrary, be assured my young friends, that architecture in the hands of men of genius may be made to assume whatever character is required of it. ... without distinctness of character, buildings may be convenient and answer the purposes for which they are raised, but they will never be pointed out as examples for imitation nor add to the splendour of the possessor, improve the national taste, or increase the national glory. the want of proper character and appropriate magnifi cence in the buildings of this wealthy metropolis is not confi ned to the exterior form and interior distribution of single structures, but is almost general (soane, 1966: 648).14 britain, as a nation, required a self-image strong enough to bolster her status, both domestically and internationally.15 the british “nation” had always included the diverse countries of the british isles, and was now the seat of an expansive empire. the attempt to develop a self-image was steeped in a cultural anxiety about the implications of its poly-cultural and poly-national constitution. how was england, the origin and centre of this largely remote empire, to keep its presence readable?16 in the true-born englishman, william defoe argued that england was a mongrel nation of mongrel origin, the barbarous offspring of all the invaders and colonizers who had besieged england in the course of history (defoe, 1701: 28-30). in the multiple and essentially arbitrary answers to the question of, what is english, defoe saw an indication that the nation was a self-conscious fabrication. the poly-stylism of neoclassicism, meanwhile, which included egyptian, “hindoo,” gothic, as well as greek and roman infl uences, refl ected the intense effects of travel on british culture, as well as the diversity of the british empire. soane’s own stylistic solution to the question of a national architecture, which went beyond that of most of his neoclassical colleagues, was the development of a new classical language. moving away from the abstracted incising of the bank of england interiors, for instance, soane developed a fully-fl edged ornamentation that combined gothic, roman and greek detailing. this was intended as a truly national style, original and contemporary, and one that would be signifi cantly unique to britain. however, it was also highly idiosyncratic, the product of individual innovation, developed in a climate in which “genius is encouraged to create, rather than to copy and adopt” (papworth, 1916: 312). soane’s “national style” appeared in many of his public projects for london, both commissioned and proposed; for example the house of lords, the law courts, the new offi ces for the board of privy trade and the privy council, as well as an ambitious (unrealised) scheme for a processional route through the city.17 its novelty was timely; a new nation needed a new language. ‘genius’ was thus employed in two different modes by soane. through the inventiveness of the “soane style”, he sought to gain a market advantage; through invention, he contributed to the means by which a nation with a newly constructed identity could represent itself. in the architectural world soane inhabited, they could be, and often were, easily blurred. the numerous controversies that soane was involved in, and that he so bitterly complained of, pitted him in battle against other architects, as well as the “state apparatus” in the form of his local district surveyor, the royal academy or parliament — in a struggle for architectural prominence.18 the ‘battle of styles’ that these confl icts represent was also a battle for political lev14 the reference to character here is signifi cant, an important element of neoclassical architectural theory, most notably theorized by quatremère de quincy. for more on this, see di palma (2002). 15 see colley (1992). 16 see pagden (1995). 17 for more information on these projects see richardson & stevens (1999). 18 for detail on these confl icts, see darley (1999). photograph by helene furján 63 erage. ‘genius’ was thus as much about economics — who will receive coveted and lucrative public commissions — as it was about aesthetic theory or artistic merit. pr: as a meticulously curated archive of soane’s production and its genealogy, witness the purchase of the dance and adams archives, or the prominently displayed piranesi etchings. soane’s house, too, is an emblem of signature construction within the terms of a legacy. the bequest of the house and its considerable collections, including over 60,000 drawings, forms a cultural inheritance both of his own work, that of those architects to whom he felt himself indebted, and of the aesthetic theories and cultural trends materialized in it. thus, it was also a temple to fame. one could think of the house — as library and museum — operating as a carefully constructed exposition, with meticulous evidence and detailed footnotes, buttressing a claim to his place in the panoply of great architectural geniuses. one could think for a moment of today’s architects engaged in similar moves: michael graves, a fan of soane, turning his house into a museum already gifted to the public; or frank gehry, signing and dating everything he draws, the building archive already under contract on his death. it could be said, that they, like peter eisenman, zaha hadid, and others, are great masters of the signature effect. and perhaps more than any other contemporary architect, graves and gehry have literally sold their signatures with canny success. the “soane style” could be seen as a similarly commercial exploitation of signature. in a parallel move, turner’s famous self-portrait at the royal academy annual show on varnishing day made great fl ourish out of his auratic presence, and clearly served to add massive commercial appeal to his signature both on the work and clearly in it. soane’s house, and the highly idiosyncratic public projects he built or designed, certainly helped cement his claim to a signature effect invention as the mark of genius. it gave a competitive advantage to a long line of ‘great’ architects, from michelangelo to ledoux, from piranesi to boullée, and continues to do so today. it is not for nothing that peter eisenman is want to insert himself into a genealogy of ‘signature’ architects, just as soane did, or that his student, greg lynn, will talk of ’signature effects‘ as a deliberate design goal, one that counters the general misapprehension that today’s digital architecture is ’autogenerated’. there is no doubt that soane was a master of self-representation, ready to demonstrate the greatness of his achievements and certain of their worth as cultural legacy. he used his ability to create a theatre of special effects and spectacular spaces: a sublime architectural virtuosity as a deliberately emphatic way of expressing his professional skill. his house’s primary ‘effect’ was thus the demonstration of soane’s consummate genius as the magician of space, a master showman displaying his talents and achievements in a blaze of effect. critic john papworth referred to soane’s work as “the ideal imagery” of “an exuberant fancy” (papworth, 1816: 312). the athenaeum, reviewing soane’s house-museum in 1828, echoed papworth’s sentiments: here he has collected his rich stores of art and antiquity. here he revels in architectural glory, dwelling, magician-like, among fairie chambers photograph by michael shepherd interstices 07 of his own creating. of its kind it is perfect, the ichnography of the very mind of the architect, everywhere diffi culties surmounted, ingenuity triumphant ... the importance of fi ction and imagination to soane’s domestic enterprise must be emphasized; fantastic invention is the mechanism by which genius can be revealed. this ‘theatrical’ architectonics complimented the architectural theatre of the house (as museum), its role as memorial immortalizing his work, his collections and his creations, of which the house-museum itself was the most exemplary manifestation. it is no surprise, then, that the visitor to the house fi nds, in the centre of the double height tribune space that focuses the museum section, a bust of soane himself, surveying his collections and accomplishments. john britton, in his theorization of architecture as an art of invention, necessitating originality, experimentation and innovation, was mindful that ‘genius’ was merely the fl ipside of a failed experiment: in this, as in many other things, much depends on success: if the architect be fortunate in his attempts, he enriches his art and adds to his powers; if he fails, he has done worse than nothing, and exposes himself to derision. innovators are like usurpers: they either become the founders of new dynasties, or are hurled as rebels from the eminence to which they aspired (1827: 9). soane may not have generated the dynasties he hoped for, but for britton (as for the many admirers of soane’s work today) it was clear that no. 13 lincoln’s inn fields memorialised, more generally, the achievement of genius in soane’s oeuvre. soane’s risky experiments in morphology and effect had paid off. references: abrams, m. h. (1971). the mirror and the lamp: romantic theory and the critical tradition. london/new york: oxford university press. bolton, a. (1927). portrait of sir john soane, ra (1753-1837) set forth in letters from his friends (1775-1837). london: butler and tanner. britton, j. (1827). the union of architecture, sculpture and painting. coleridge, s.t. (1817). biographia literaria. london: rest fenner. colley, l. (1992). britons: forging the nation 1707-1837. new haven/london: yale university press defoe, d. (1701). the true-born englishman: a satyr. london. darley, g. (1999). john soane: an accidental romantic. new haven/london: yale university press designs for public and private buildings. the athenaeum (15 april 1828). feinberg millenson, s. (1984). the genesis of sir john soane‘s museum idea: 1801-1810. journal of the society of architectural historians (october 1984), 225-237. 65 feinberg millenson, s. (1987). sir john soane’s museum. umi research press. furján, h. (2002). sir john soane’s spectacular theatre. aa files (47, summer), 12-22. furján, h. (1997). the specular spectacle of the house of the collector. assemblage (34, december), 57-92. gowing, l. (1966). turner: imagination and reality. new york: the museum of modern art gwynn, j. (1766). london and westminster improve. london. maeda, j. (2004). creative code. new york: thames & hudson. pagden, a. (1995). lords of all the world: ideologies of empire in spain, britain and france c. 15001800. new haven/london: yale university press. papworth, j. b. (1816). select views of london (no. lxxvi). perrault, c. (1993). ordonnance for the five kinds of columns after the method of the ancients (i. kagis mcewen, trans.). santa monica (ca): getty center for the history of art and the humanities. (first published 1683). richardson, m., & stevens, m. a. (eds.). (1999). john soane architect: master of space and light. london: royal academy of arts schumann-bacia, e. (1991). john soane and the bank of england. new york: princeton architectural press. soane, j. (1830 & 1835/36). description of the house and museum. soane, j. (1996) lectures. in watkin, d. sir john soane: enlightenment thought and the royal academy lectures. cambridge: cambridge university press. stroud, d. (1996). sir john soane: architect. london: dlm. summerson, j. (1983). soane: the man and the style. in john soane. london/new york: academy editions/st. martin’s press. teyssot, g. (1978). john soane and the birth of style (notes on the architectural project in the years around 1800). oppositions (14), 61-83. thornton, p., & dorey, h. (1992). sir john soane: the architect as collector. new york: harry n abrams di palma, v. (2002). architecture, environment and emotion: quatremère de quincy and the concept of character. aa files (47, summer), 45-56. in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e 101 f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m aaron paterson & michael davis propagating a legacy: undisciplined drawings and evolving technology the university of auckland’s school of architecture and planning has a legacy of teaching and producing architectural media that challenges normative representations of the discipline. this was made evident in auckland during 2017, at the school’s centennial exhibition, the auckland school: 100 years of architecture and planning (milojevic, treep, barrie, & gatley 2017). it showed that although technology had changed many representation methods over the years, there has been a continuum of students developing idiosyncratic representation styles and an insistence on students demonstrating a critical position in representation. since the 1980s, when the auckland school developed a reputation as a “drawing school” (barrie 2017: 108), a culture of rigorous media use has been cultivated by many teachers and through the shared memory of many beautiful drawings produced by students and staff. the “critical” approach to media was championed by sarah treadwell, who joined the school in 1981, and was originally employed to teach disciplinary types of drawings including plan, section, elevation, and axonometric. teaching “criticality” can be described as a process of asking students to question why they are drawing in a certain way, and to see drawing, making, and architecture as intrinsically connected. treadwell taught her students that the use of media was never a neutral act and could be much more than a mechanical representation process. the insistence that drawings could be considered a work of art put her at odds, in a collegial way, with patrick hanly, a painter of considerable note and a teacher of freehand drawing at the auckland school. treadwell recalled that hanly refused to see architectural drawing as art. instead, he saw it as a utilitarian form of representation, separate from his art practice (treadwell 2016). moving from the mechanical to the artistic and critical was in line with the theoretical turn and the growth of intellectual thoughtfulness throughout architectural academia. it represented a shift in how drawing, or media as it is now called, was taught at the auckland school. media now looked to challenge the dogma of the discipline and ideas of culture, gender, and occupation. students at the auckland school are still encouraged to use representation as a means to explore ideas beyond building-as-usual, or to pursue the founding challenge of the academic journal most closely associated with the school, interstices, as “the spaces between ideas” (about interstices 2017). traditionally, the school 102 propagating a legacy: undisciplined drawings and evolving technology f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e has taken pride in understanding the periphery, rather than the cutting edge of technology, making students adept at exploring the pitfalls and unintended consequences of technology as well as challenging the discipline through its critical use of architectural and non-architectural media. thus, andrew barrie, who had been a student in the auckland school in the 1990s and was appointed as its professor of design in 2009, has observed that its reputation for representation has broadened in recent years from “drawing” to “making” (barrie 2017: 125). this article considers how the introduction of architectural software focused solely on “making” in media may neglect a genuine legacy of students producing idiosyncratic graphic styles and exploring the periphery of the discipline in favour of mechanical drawing. it shows that criticality and making must coexist to continue the school’s critical legacy in media. is the auckland school’s critical legacy at risk from normalising software? in design studio and media classes, the biggest threat from technology to the school’s critical legacy does not come from cutting-edge technologies like virtual and augmented realities or robotics, to name a couple of upstart disruptors, but from architecture’s flabby commercial middle, the promise of building information modelling (bim) software. software packages like revit and archicad are positively historic now, but this technology, more than others, still feels foreign in the studios of the auckland school. the lack of uptake of industry-standard bim software by students creates a schism between how the academy makes and how the profession draws. the question remains: to what extent should the auckland school be a vocational tool for practice? bim and other software with a bias towards fabrication and construction are viewed here as a normalising force that is descriptive (a “how-to” methodology), rather than speculative. bim challenges the legacy of the auckland school’s resolve for students developing critical positions. it is argued here that the incorporation of bim into media courses need not be at the expense of the situated practices concerned with the “what” of architecture if students are taught the disciplinary biases of the technology and use software as one tool among an array of options. methodologies over software many schools across new zealand and australia feel pressure from the profession to deliver practice-ready graduates. it is often argued that students require new knowledge acquisition with a bias towards project delivery and media outcomes that are descriptive. the potential of bim in practice is well established; it dissolves the gap between construction delivery, the production of design intent, and the transmission of information (garber 2014: 120–27). bim challenges the primacy of design and the divisions between disciplines as well as notions of collaborative authorship. architects, as the controllers of the one-to-one digital model, are given back a lost agency during the construction process. all these positives in practice are problematised in academia when academics are pushed by industry to produce graduates that are bim-ready or, more simplistically, revit-ready. the resistance in academia is understandable given that the primacy of design in studio is at odds with the woefully poor design features of the bim software. peggy deamer (2011) has championed a need for the integration of bim 103 propagating a legacy: undisciplined drawings and evolving technology f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e into architectural education, asking where it should be taught. is bim a software issue and, therefore, should it be taught as a support course or an elective? or is it a new way to design collaboratively? architectural practitioners around the world have used bim and parametric modelling to make innovative design responses that do not adhere to professional norms—to name a couple, the perot museum of nature and science designed by morphosis (2012) and kaohsiung port terminal by reiser + umemoto of rur architecture (2012–16). similarly, architecture schools worldwide have embraced digital fabrication in their course programmes. most schools have digital fabrication equipment and many offer programmes that specialise in transdisciplinary design research with a focus on constantly evolving digital technologies. for example, rmit’s spatial information architecture laboratory (sial) offers a master of design innovation and technology.1 there is not a specific programme for digital fabrication at the auckland school, but students are adept at picking up new technologies for fabricating including the use of robotic arms, 3d printing, and virtual and augmented realities. barrie has consistently offered a postgraduate design stream focused on fabrication using timber technologies. when designing the learning objectives for a second-year media course at the auckland school, we wanted to ensure that bim and parametric techniques did not become the sole content of the course. however, we did want these techniques to assist students with form-making and the production of drawings that communicate fabrication thinking. for these reasons, we incorporated into the course bim and other architectural software with embedded tendencies towards construction. this course is taught during the third semester of a bachelor of architectural studies (bas) and follows on from the more speculative first-year introductions to media. the course is sequenced in the bachelor’s degree to enable students to consider the idiosyncratic nature of their workflows. bim and parametric software are used to communicate spatial ideas as well as test fabrication and assembly. the course’s learning outcomes push students to understand fabrication methodologies over bim software, like revit. it is important that bim is integrated into an existing suite of media skills that assist with learning-by-making. these skills include hand drawing, physical and digital modelling, collage, and animation. the aim is to problematise bim in relation to an overall workflow made up of a series of relationships between separate media practices. representation of fabrication methodologies in architectural media what types of representations are produced when fabrication and assembly are pushed in a media course? traditionally, drawings that explore fabrication, assembly, and tectonics have been particular tools of investigation in the dialogue between design and realisation. jean prouvé called these “constructive ideas” (picon 1983), with the view that drawing constructs how architects design. contrary to this insistence that drawing is the driver of design, digital modelling operations give primacy to the one-to-one model as both the object and constructible output of architecture. it is revealing that we revert to traditional architectural representation to tell the story of fabrication. this is because it ties back into the disciplinary history of architectural representation and allows 104 propagating a legacy: undisciplined drawings and evolving technology f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e abstract critical thinking. drawings produced by second-year media students include: unfolded / developed surface; exploded axonometric; axonometric; material assembly; façade / elevation study; digital fabrication cutting sheet; analytique—multi-informational drawings; and operative perspective. what knowledge do these drawings privilege and how does this measure up to the school’s critical legacy of media? a contemporary disciplinary bias of the “how” architecture, as a spatial practice, often reveals its disciplinary knowledge through representations. in this respect, media is understood as discursive (kulper 2013), representing the disciplinary knowledge and discourses privileged during different eras. amy kulper invokes foucault’s understanding of a discipline as a regime that produces knowledge. the contemporary operations of architecture’s discursive representations reflect a shifting disciplinary bias towards “architectural images whose sole aspiration is to communicate the techniques of their own making” (kulper 2013: 42). the digital fabrication cutting sheet (see fig. 1) represents a merging of design and fabrication practice for the discipline. the drawing is a demonstration of its construction and assembly. kulper claims that contemporary design research and architectural images of fabrication focus on the techniques and protocols of the design process and privilege the “how” over the “what”. a danger for media pedagogy is that the technique may become the content. this concern is magnified when trying to incorporate bim into media courses. its normalising defaults and design tools overly predict formal outcomes to make all drawings look the same. fig. 1 louie tong, march(prof ) thesis student, constructed pavilion and digital fabrication cutting sheet, 2016. the bias of the “how” overshadows representations of the situated practice, or what stan allen refers to as the practice of architecture “marked by this promiscuous mix of the real and the abstract” (2009: xvii). kulper asserts that: architecture’s disciplinarity is best represented by recognising the reciprocity of its techniques for making with the political, social and cultural 105 propagating a legacy: undisciplined drawings and evolving technology f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e contexts it engages. how architects do what they do is a critical aspect of the continuity of the discipline, but our disciplinary discourse must aspire to more (2013: 64). alessandro zambelli in “the undisciplined drawing” argues that transdisciplinary drawings, sitting between the thresholds of disciplines, can be described as “undisciplined” (2013: 357–79). this undisciplined character is true for abandoned drawing types such as piranesi’s multi-informational drawings that use perspective in an uncanny, undisciplined manner. it could be argued that piranesi’s drawings are all about technique. however, there is also an implicit critique of the discipline because the drawings reveal the inadequacies of mid-eighteenth-century drawing conventions for communicating his aims. there is a long history of undisciplinary representation at the auckland school, and it is important that contemporary students understand their drawings and other architectural representations as part of a discourse so that they may explore the space between the “how” and the “what”. let’s do the time warp again at this point, it is worth considering if there are pedagogical lessons to be learnt from the mainstreaming of the digital in the 1990s when this undisciplined intruder challenged the school’s legacy of valuing hand-drafted speculative drawings. studio culture was in flux at the turn of the century, with the introduction of computers and the way students used the design studio. in 1996, jules moloney, who was on the staff from 1995 to 2005, advocated for computer use in the design studio rather than their isolation into labs (barrie 2017: 123). this bold strategy was adopted with poppy-coloured imacs distributed around the studio spaces on levels 2–4 of the architecture building. before the school refurbishments in 2002, there was an air of the “wild west” about studio spaces, with students bringing their own furniture and creating ad hoc structures to house their cliques. this led to staff navigating student shanty towns with army-surplus tarpaulin tepees strewn across the studio and drawing boards used for makeshift communal kitchenettes. this lo-fi environment could not be further from the rigid fit-out and clear hierarchy between student and teacher that was instated in 2002 and continues today. radical student experimentation was valued and rewarded as an outcome of this chaotic studio culture. this was a time before digital skills became prosaic and there was the view among students that their digital knowledge put them apart from practising architects who did not possess such skill. this is not to argue that the quality of the design projects being produced was better than the present; many celebrated student projects of the time had very little traditionally recognisable architectural content and left elder practising architects scratching their heads. the animations of the era seem pixelated and simple, the architectural equivalent of a first-generation cellphone, all chunky and oversized. however, there is something to be said for the spirit of the times, which fostered a level of creative representational radicalism that has scarcely been seen since. the “anything goes” attitude of the studio space enabled a critical adoption of digital tools. the shift towards new digital representational techniques was made explicit in the comparison of the media of sean flanagan and sam cuttriss (see figs. 2 and 3), both of whom were selected to represent the auckland school in the 2000 106 propagating a legacy: undisciplined drawings and evolving technology f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e new zealand institute of architects (nzia) student design awards—an annual competition between new zealand’s three schools of architecture, in which each school is represented by four finalists. without falling into false dichotomies of analogue and digital, flanagan’s detailed work was characterised by an approach to drawing that was esteemed at the auckland school. here, privilege was given to architectural composition that consisted of parts set in relation to other parts, an approach that was considered typical of work in the field of “modernist tectonics”. cuttriss’ proposal for a synthetic expression took theoretical inspiration from american computer scientist and futurist ray kurzweil’s the age of spiritual machines (1999), which asserted the day was coming where human bodies would become synthetic, and would be eventually replaced by spiritual robots. in cuttriss’ words, his architectural exploration “critically engages the nature of synthetic space, and develops an environment as a continuation, an extension of reality. a substrate within which our synthetic other may exist” (cuttriss in nzia student design awards 2001). this can be considered a moment at the auckland school when architecture made an appearance outside its discipline and declared architecture’s ability to merge its own and other disciplinary methods. fig. 2 sean flanagan, auckland regional civil defence station, 2000. fig. 3 sam cuttriss, synthetic expression [still from animation], 2000. 107 propagating a legacy: undisciplined drawings and evolving technology f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e the digital turn of new zealand architecture schools was slower to become mainstream when compared with others around the world. this was unceremoniously pointed out by howard raggatt, an adjunct professor at melbourne’s rmit and the international judge for the 2000 nzia student design awards. raggatt said he was given a “little fright” seeing new zealand students still clinging to traditional pencils: “computer-generated designs are entirely ubiquitous at rmit,” he explained, i would be shocked if anything else appeared—in fact i doubt the students can use a drawing board or physically write in the traditional sense. so, to walk into a room where graduates are producing work that is not a reproduction or output, but crafted like an art work, was a little shocking—like walking into a time warp (raggatt in nzia student design awards 2001: 75–76). given raggatt’s penchant toward the new and digital it was not surprising that the winning project for the first year of the new millennium was a boundary-pushing digital animation full of speculative optimism, but bereft of human presence and traditional architectonic craft. a lament for the death of hand drawing followed, alongside recognition of an emerging digital craft (davis 2009: 82–91) and media outcomes exploring new fields that included film animation, web design, and gaming. although cuttriss pushed furthest away from the school’s legacy of valuing hand-drafted speculative drawings as outcomes, it did not diminish its insistence on the aesthetic and speculative at the forefront of emerging digital representational techniques. in retrospect, this was less about the death of the handcraft than the emergence of new areas of representation and hybrid experimentation. the success of cuttriss’ proposal encouraged other students to explore the “digital”, as it was referred to at the time. in effect, it was an un-nuanced marker for anything to do with a computer. in 2003, a close-knit group of students from the auckland school produced an exhibition titled quickenings: digital film architecture (bellard & chua 2003). the exhibition explored the intersection of film, architecture, and the digital through final-year student work made between 1999 and 2002. stand-out work included melanie tonkin’s emotional city (2002), an animation that examined a glitch in a prosaic landscape, resulting in a turner-esque dematerialised space that challenged traditional orthographic and perspective representation (see fig. 4). equally challenging was eu jin chua’s wallpaper (2000), which questioned the norms of “good taste” in architectural representation. the animation was a pointed response to disparaging comments fig. 4 melanie tonkin, emotional city [still from animation], 2002. 108 propagating a legacy: undisciplined drawings and evolving technology f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e about interior design as “wallpaper”, implying that interior design was the lesser art form compared to architecture. the exhibition highlighted the transdisciplinary ambition of the auckland school and its ongoing legacy of critique aimed at destabilising the bastions of architectural discipline. sarah treadwell summed up the zeitgeist in the quickenings exhibition catalogue, drawing allusions to the weather as a metaphor for digital space and its connection to media practice: weather is always about future conditions mapped with signs from the past. architecture, too, is caught in a complex oscillation between representations weighed down by history and technologies that imagine a future in the present. anxiety about weather is a consequence of its unpredictability, and architecture suffers a similar anxiety as it negotiates new forms arising from anticipated conditions and changing technologies. weather and architecture, seemingly opposed states, can be seen to share aesthetic and social inclinations (treadwell 2003: 20–22). quickenings’ animations presented digital technique as content and, in an “undisciplined” moment, they also challenged the discipline’s orthodoxies. fast-forward to now: making, hybridity, and the undisciplined drawing if we take this “undisciplined” approach as a lesson about contemporary challenges in teaching architectural media, we can imagine how asking students to invest in the idea of fabrication could produce diverse media outcomes. since the auckland school’s first digital turn, there has been a consistent emphasis on the hybrid use of media pointing to a continuation of explorations that attempt to reveal the “how” and the “what” of kulper’s dichotomy. treadwell advanced a hybrid analogue and digital approach as the most productive way to solve architectural problems. with this model, students should be encouraged to move from one mode of representation to another to discover the potential and anomalies of each, as teaching media is not about the “technical acquisition of a skill, a digital skill, but rather it’s a mode of critical thinking about the subject” (treadwell 2016). this kind of hybridity suits the contemporary way that students learn the use of digital modelling, and bim is one subset of media that students must master, along with physical modelling, digital fabrication, sketching, animation, and virtual and augmented realities. second-year media, as taught in 2017, continues the auckland school’s legacy of making, hybridity, and undisciplined drawing, where students are encouraged to examine the content of the construct represented. students begin with sketching and generative model-making, which becomes the basis for a digital/bim model that allows the students to focus on how to communicate fabrication and occupation. from here, digital collage and cut-out techniques are used to embed narrative into architecture, allowing stories to unfold. drawing styles jump from fantastical to technical and are used to discover narrative content that exceeds the parameters of construction. the hybrid use of media is a consequence of a design workflow particular to each student assembling a portfolio with a range of media outputs. this forces the 109 propagating a legacy: undisciplined drawings and evolving technology f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e student to think about the specific aspects of their practice and helps them to explore relationships between different types of media. the portfolio of vinayak garg (see fig. 5) exemplifies the work of recent and current second-year media students. he examined the narrative potential of merging fabrication ideas with a hybrid collage of media that included collage (cut out and digital), fabrication cutting sheets, plaster models from digital patterns, and animation. garg’s drawings are loaded with references to architectural precedents, from the drawn style of superstudio to the built work of louis kahn. the construct’s surface is embedded with characters from hieronymus bosch’s oil painting, the garden of earthly delights (ca. 1490–1505). an animation plays with the conventions of the exploded fabrication drawing. similarly, fin forster’s drawing for the course (see fig. 6) uses a hybrid media process to test how a construct may be occupied and operated. both drawings evoke worlds with numerous meanings and tectonic possibilities. fig. 5 vinayak garg, second-year media student, collage combining plaster physical models, made from a bim model, and animation, 2016. the student work produced in this course reveals an interesting area of productive digital speculation that merges the fabrication potential implicit in bim, grasshopper, and collage techniques. sam jacob sees the speculative value in “collage culture” that privileges curation, editing, narrative, assemblage, and photoshop. this type of post-digital representation offers a reconnection with architectural images as “polemical assemblages”. jacob states, the digital drawing tools we now have at our disposal have changed the relationship we now have to images—both as we consume and make them. but at the same time these tools can allow us to engage with the long disciplinary history of architectural representation (2017). 110 propagating a legacy: undisciplined drawings and evolving technology f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e the hybrid collages point to ways forward that continue the speculative legacy of media while embracing fabrication and bim. the introduction of bim into studio, while important, should not be a primary aim without critically positioning it within a workflow. bim is not implicitly obvious in the drawings; it is subsumed in the process, making part of the drawing possible and leading the work to a place that embraces fabrication, materiality, texture, and craft unexpectedly. these hybrid drawings express an interest in a compositional tectonic of parts. curiously, this is a move back to flanagan’s tectonic expression as distinct from cuttriss’ atmospheric surface with students toggling between the abstract and the real. since the 1990s, the syllabus has shifted from teaching the disciplinary drawing of plan, section, elevation, axonometric, and physical modelling. digital modelling and animations have been added to this media suite. now we accept that media practice informs design. we talk about communicating fabrication thinking and encourage students to embrace the engagement potential of augmented and virtual realities. one element that is consistent between eras is the desire to teach students to understand the privileged disciplinary knowledge behind media positions and to raise questions about what constitutes creative engagement with drawings and technology. in this way, bim, as a tool for the communication of fabrication thinking, can be used critically rather than merely describing learning outcomes. it is vital that we encourage students to think beyond the act of representation, demonstrate their understanding of drawing as part of a larger discourse, and produce undisciplined drawings where appropriate. in this way, we will see the propagation of the auckland school’s critical legacy. fig. 6 fin forster, second-year media student, hybrid drawing, 2017. 111 propagating a legacy: undisciplined drawings and evolving technology f r o m b e au xa r t s t o b i m in t e r s t ic e s a u c k l a n d s c h o o l c e n t e n a r y s p e c ia l i s s u e endnotes 1 for an overview of rmit’s master of design innovation and technology (mdit) coursework programme, see http://www.sial. rmit.edu.au/sial-study/ references about interstices (2017). interstices: journal of architecture and related arts. retrieved from http://interstices. ac.nz/about-interstices/ allen, s. (2009). practice: architecture, technique and representation. new york: routledge. barrie, a. (2017). “architecture to a fault”: the postmodern years. in j. gatley & l. treep (eds.), the auckland school: 100 years of architecture and planning (pp. 102–127). auckland: school of architecture and planning, university of auckland. bellard m., & chua, e. j., curators. (2003). quickenings: digital film architecture. auckland: film archive, february 20–april 2. chua, e. j. (2000). wallpaper [animation / mp3 file]. auckland. davis, m. (2009). maintaining the abstract critical facility in post-digital drawing practice. interstices: journal of architecture and related arts, 11, 82–91. deamer, p. (2011). introduction. in p. deamer and p. g. bernstein (eds.), bim in academia. new haven, ct: yale school of architecture. garber, r. (2014). no more stopping. in bim design: realising the creative potential of building information modelling (pp. 120–127). somerset, gb: wiley. jacob, s. (2017). drawing as project: post-digital representation in architecture. retrieved from http:// strangeharvest.com/ wp17/?p=4047 kulper, a. c. (2013). representing the discipline: the operations of architecture’s discursive imagery. architecture and culture, 1(1), 42–66. kurzweil, r. (1999). the age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence. new york: viking. milojevic, m., treep, l., barrie, a., & gatley, j., curators. (2017). the auckland school: 100 years of architecture and planning. auckland: gus fisher gallery, september 8–november 4. nzia student design awards. (2001). architecture new zealand, january–february, 75–78. picon, a. (1983). is drawing dead? in jean prouvé: l’idée constructive. paris: dunod. tonkin, m. (2002). emotional city [animation / mp3 file]. auckland. treadwell, s. (2003). digital weather: pacific space. in e. j. chua & m. bellard (eds.), quickenings: digital film architecture [exhibition catalogue] (pp. 20–22). auckland: the nz film archive. treadwell, s. (2016, september 28). personal interview with l. treep, auckland. zambelli, a. (2013). the undisciplined drawing. buildings, 3, 357–379. interstices02.indb 21 the artist, architect and town planner, luc deleu, worked for more than ten years on the project, the unadapted city,2 a speculative urban-scale project articulated as a succession of spatial models. as each of these encloses the preceding ones, vipcity, its last occurrence, represents the entire project. the unadapted city has been shown in numerous exhibitions and described in three monographs.3 if the impressive numbers of accompanying tables, diagrams, drawings and models testify to the enterprise’s scale and complexity, this documentation doesn’t fully succeed in revealing the project’s nature or goals. though the author himself provides for its chronicle through an abundance of explanatory notes, an impression remains that he is showing the pieces of a giant jigsaw devoid of an outline. in fact, deleu has become famous through his peculiar manner of showing things. his practice of what he termed “resistance architecture” (davidts, 1999: middle verso of fold page 10) soon attracted the attention of the contemporary art world.4 the piles of containers, the tumbled-down pylons and cranes, the manifestos and controversial proposals, and even his urban conversion projects, all had the capacity to involve the viewer.5 his work did not seem to ask for analysis as much as it did for an audience, and often derived its meaning from the pleasure and effect of a gesture.6 an earlier version of ticle was published as car pour fi nir tout retourne à la mer – vipcity ou la mise en scène d’une fi liation (châtel 2004), which was translated from the french by michael novy in february 2006. 2 luc deleu b.1944, founder of top offi ce (“turn on planning”), antwerp. 3 deleu (1996); theys (2001); deleu (2002). 4 in this interview deleu explains that he wants to resist the generally accepted notion that every practice of architecture must be instrumental and fi nally aimed at building. he states that the current separation between art and architecture is inopportune and reductive; that there is no reason why a work of architecture could not be an image or a discourse. 5 for an overall view of the work prior to the unadapted city, see deleu (1991). 6 see bekaert (1991). plan obus and vipcity, as from father to son guy châtel installation with two high-tension pylons lying down for initiatief 86, ghent, 1986 photo : dominique stroobant orbino, nauerna, 2002 photo luc deleu interstices 07 the unadapted city started with such a gesture. the work was launched in 1995, following wien usiebenpole, the project for a linear city of 120,000 inhabitants on the donau insel.7 on this occasion deleu used the score of strauss’s blue danube to regulate the city’s functional arrangement. through the arbitrariness of this procedure, he drew attention to architecture’s lack of instruments for the conception and regulation of urban facilities. the unadapted city, in turn, aimed at studying and developing models for the deployment of such facilities which, for deleu, are an essential element of habitat. beyond their contribution to comfort and their organizational aptitude, he acknowledges their capacity to become part of our heritage in future years. noting that the public space is under pressure from private interests, he intends to induce decision-makers to face their responsibilities by confronting them with his project’s ‘ethical stand’. through his work with urban facilities, or equipment, he proposes to advance a renewal of western societies’ urban habitats. in initiating new strategies, deleu seems to hope that the project will provide examples that may contribute to a critique of the aims of architecture and urbanism.8 deleu sets his ambition against the current aims of a discipline he considers to be too pragmatic and therefore impotent. he asserts that the unadapted city is a work of ‘conceptual urbanism’, an autonomous theoretical venture.9 seen in this light however, it reveals some fragility. the postulates that supposedly underlie it are nowhere verifi ed. the work cannot be said to grow out of its premises; it forges ahead regardless. undeniably speculative in character, its desire to be exemplary predisposes it towards representation, and a performance that is elaborated through an abundance of references to modernism and the oeuvre of le corbusier. while the project derives much of its meaning from this posture of a descendant, the work simultaneously bounces off its cross-references, continually gets carried way by its marginalia. representation is constructed in the course of its enunciation, and hence the work is much more a discursive than a theoretical undertaking. rather than furnish the project with arguments that its author prefers to dispense with, i shall attempt to make sense of its cunning genealogical claims. these claims do not occur in properly referenced arguments but in the course of enunciation. for instance, the two most recent monographs about the unadapted city, which were produced under deleu’s own control and can therefore be regarded as part of its documentary fund, contain a large number of photographs of le corbusier’s work – without explanation. this essay is an attempt to discover what they hint at, by re-ordering the pieces of the jigsaw deleu presents us with. 7 for an account of this project, see châtel (2001a: 43-47). 8 for all those claims, see deleu (2002: 25). 9 see châtel & davidts (2003). wien usiebenpole, model, 19941995 photo : syb’l s.pictures wien usiebenpole, eigenmächtiges funktionsarrangement, 1994-96, digital drawing 23 the unadapted city proceeds in stages. it begins with ten panels that make up an atlas of urban facilities.10 each corresponds to a category of services and is a graphic transposition of quantitative data derived from the analysis of existing urban equipment. their surface area grows, seemingly in response to population growth. but this is about a different form of exploration from reading. the large polychrome panels are nothing like the dry verbiage one would expect from such documents. here, already, the image reigns supreme and the ‘taxography’ tends towards the iconic. the panel listing medical services brings to mind the play of light across the pale green walls of a hospital, while that listing culture and leisure activities evokes a criss-cross pattern of light beams. the atlas relates the equipment programme to the number of inhabitants. another document, the dos standard,11graphically represents the proportional relation between the surface needed for this equipment programme and the housing area. here, the equipment is presented in three columns according to its desired distribution. deleu differentiates between structural, zoned and occasional allocations, depending on the impact that a type of service may have on the structure of its environment. the dos standard is not only the end-product of data processing, it also constitutes an articulated and quantifi ed programme of urban habitat its generator. 10 the ten panels form a set shown for the fi rst time in may 1996 at the netherlands architecture institute (nai) in rotterdam. these documents were published in deleu (1996). since then, several of the panels have been revised. 11 dos is the acronym for de onaangepaste stad, the dutch name of the unadapted city. luc deleu & t.o.p. offi ce, dos ‘95 (la ville inadaptée) planche viii culture & divertissement, 1999, dessin digitalisé, © sabam interstices 07 bingbong (1996) should be regarded as a fi rst draft of the spatial model of the unadapted city – more an illustration, however, than a test of the generator. the urbanistic conception of this district for 6,800 inhabitants is based on usiebenpole. through the radical application of precepts such as the dictatorship of the sun, the segregation of traffi c and the liberation of soil, the latter project was in full conformity with the town planning ideology of the 1930’s. the entire habitat of the linear city was installed in a sequence of 110 unités d’habitation,12 with entwined infrastructure on several levels serving the inner streets. bingbong offers a variant of this, but remains a simple mechanism for the occupation of space. instead of repeating the 12 le corbusier, housing unit of compatible size. deleu uses the unité of marseilles, 1946-1952. 13 these are averages calculated from data relating to a large number of existing districts and towns. also featured are calculations aimed at estimating the population of their hinterland. top left: junction haarlem-amsterdam ‘halfweg’, a surface arrangement for a building development for 60.000 inhabitants, 1995 top right: housing generator 2000, a surface arangement for a building development for 20.000 people/sa standard, 1997 right: bing bong, 1996 d.o.s. ‘95 (the unadapted city). photo: steven van den bergh 25 architecture of the unité, deleu applies the term literally; the running metre of the unité is put forward as a yardstick, one metre corresponding to the housing of 6.4 persons. the habitat is organized in buildings of various shapes, designed as extrusions from the unité’s cross-profi le. subsequent development of the spatial model will be based on a gradual approach to urban complexity, where several thresholds are marked in response to rising population. the base level is the number of persons that the unité de marseille could reasonably house today, i.e. an average of 2.51 inhabitants for each of its 350 apartments, or a total of 878 persons. the second level is represented by the unité’s original population, i.e.1,600 persons. the next levels are the district, the local town and the regional city, for which dos envisages respectively 9,500, 22,000 and 72,000 inhabitants.13 the highest level, threshold for a truly urban situation, would be reached with a population of 192,000. brikabrak (1998) and dinkytown (1998-99) are projects for districts of 9,500 inhabitants, based entirely on the bingbong system. brikabrak is the primitive model of dinkytown, and both have a full place in octopus (1999). the latter proposes a system of four crossing infrastructure lines, marking out the centre of a city whose linear districts could extend in eight different directions. but it does not extend beyond this knot where the brikabrak and dinkytown districts join, forming a local-sized town of 38,000.14 the numerical growth is obtained by doubling the population each time, earlier projects being incorporated into the new. thus octopus, in its turn, was destined to form an integral part of vipcity (1999), which generates the infrastructure of an enormous housing development, whose 15,140 lots allow the population to be doubled again.15 this brings the project up to the level of a regional city. the additional equipment necessitated by the population growth is installed alongside a monorail track, which connects with the octopus centre. 14 the fi gure of octopus is like the fi gure [#] – octopus or eight limbs. on two of its branches brikabrak and dinkytown are fi xed. the population is 9500 + 9500 (for brikabrak and dinkytown) + 19000 on the knot fi gure itself (#): total 38000. 15 each lot has 0.663 hectare, so that 0.663 hectare = 2.51 x 0.2643 ha. on the basis of an ‘orbanistic’ calculation, deleu presents 0.2643 ha as the average land area available for individual housing. thus the 0.663 ha lots represent the ‘maximum luxury’ that a family could have access to today. by drawing the boundaries in such a way as to suggest later division of the land, deleu anticipates the calculations being very soon overtaken by the vertiginous growth in world population; he refers to the housing lot ironically as “decent”. the concept of maximum luxury is the justifi cation for the name vipcity. population redoubled results in (15,140 x 2.51) + 38.000 (original population of octopus) = 76.000 inhabitants for vipcity. d.o.s. xxi vipcity # 9 updated d.o.s. xxi model octopus, model t(scale 1:2000), 1999, 6 x 301 x 80 cm photo : steven van den bergh interstices 07 the avowed aim of the systematic exploration carried out through successive spatial models, is none other than the gradual discovery of the capacity of functional arrangements to organize and modulate urban space. yet the unadapted city has the special feature of grasping the whole articulation of a project by its extremities, by its knowledge base or, more precisely, its statistical substructure; and by its outcome, that is to say, its morphology and shape. both ends are determined in enunciation, fi xed in accordance with a logic specifi c to them. the fi rst is the product of detailed study; the second is placed there, like a courtroom exhibit hastily assembled from the debris of architecture’s history. the project can thus be seen as a double systematic procedure, which follows two lines of action entirely controlled by deduction; two lines that the author then endeavours to cross with each other. in the limited space where they meet, the information is submitted to a stochastic equation, producing what deleu called, in an unpublished notebook, a “spatial choreography”.16 we fi nd this choreography in the documents entitled, “clustering of the amenities” or “space arrangement”.17 these are the scores that note the facts, events, accidents, fi gures and forms of functional arrangement: the architecture of the unadapted city. it is by force that deleu brings the project back to the simplicity of a double deductive sequence: it is obtained by deliberate inversion of its ends and means. the spatial model of the unadapted city is given in its entirety at the outset, its form 16 see châtel (2001a: 52). 17 the publications show that before vipcity was embarked on, that is, until octopus, the plates and diagrams portraying these ”clustered amenities” and ”space arrangements” were virtually all the project had in terms of graphic documentation. for vipcity there is the addition of plans, elevations and cross-sections. d.o.s. ‘98 model dinkytown ground arrrangement digital drawing, 1999 27 already crystallized. the project develops its discourse – and in fact reveals itself – after being assembled in this way. deleu’s stand is to concentrate on the functional, on the comfort and ease given to urban life by suitable equipment and good distribution of services, shops, places for work, leisure and rest. he overlooks the question of how fi t these are as frameworks for interaction and exchange between the inhabitants, for the vitality of a human environment. every project is assumed to be carried out in terms of the virtuality that is the destination of its object. there is always a conceptualized anticipation in the act of architecture or urbanism. this anticipation is constituted by the expectation of its use, of its appropriation. in the unadapted city, however, appropriation is not really anticipated but, rather, simulated. inhabitants remain abstract, they count only in terms of their numbers. moreover, a project responds to a demand, to a need or a lack. but the relationships that it sets up are of the order of the possible, not of the necessary. that contingency, specifi c to architecture and urbanism, is controlled by the notion of propriety. in other words, it is governed by judgement and tempered by suitability. through the reversal that deleu imposes on the project, contingency is circumscribed within the closed fi eld delineated by the question of functional arrangement. it is a playground and a fi eld for experience where his hand remains totally free. he alone lays down the rules and interprets them. it is the compression of contingency, the neutralization of propriety and the underplaying of appropriation which justify the project’s curious name. this city would be ‘unadapted’ because it is liberated from architecture’s conventional straightjacket. one discovers that the unadapted city is not so much the project of a city as that of an image of the city. this image is given as a reminder of the symbolics of modernism, the recapture of an emblematic linear city. by its allegiance to the deductive method it is directly related to the work of ciam iv.18 but this relationship turns out to be dialectical. through its choreography of functional congestion, the unadapted city presents itself as an antithesis to the functional city that emerges from the doctrine of the charte d’athènes; the project is a critique of modernism in terms of its own language.19 what it might mean for our time, however, remains obscure.20 since the launching of vipcity, the project has undergone a remarkable change of tack. in spite of the fact that the additional housing is no longer correlated to the infrastructure, the latter still supports urban facilities and organizes public space. the monorail line is marked by huge offi ce buildings hinting at the regular emplacement of the stations. the monumental alignment of these ‘matching buildings’21 punctuates the route slashed into the isotropic carpet of housing lots. the line cuts through an ominous allotment. thus, eased of the disguise of an illusive urban unity, the unadapted city can reveal its stubborn actuality. the effort of the project is now directed to the details of entwining the infrastructure, the collective facilities and the public space. an esplanade on several levels snakes along the infrastructural braid and seems to rebel against the stately dance of the tower blocks. just as le corbusier’s 1931-1939 plan obus for algiers preserved the kasbah’s gradients, vipcity spares the tract of the plots. but beyond their shared tolerance of a habitat’s dissipation and conservatism, a comparison of vipcity with plan obus reveals the unadapted city’s distinctive features. 18 see van der woud (1983: 66). he points out that the election of cor van eesteren as new chairman after ciam iii meant that the reliability of a rational approach was preferred to the visionary attitude of le corbusier and his supporters. in the directives of ciam iv, the new chairman calls this approach “the materialist deductive method” and, while opposing what he calls “idealistic induction”, he legitimizes it by stating that it corresponds to the common will expressed at the fi rst congress. 19 this is the conclusion reached in châtel (2001a). 20 in châtel (2001a: 46), i put forward the hypothesis that for usiebenpole this critical value is determined by the project’s anachronistic character. in a text going back to 1976, used as introduction, koolhaas (1995) notes in respect of bijlmermeer – a late example (end of the 1960s) of the most radical modernist urbanism – that “if architectural debate is an endless re-enactment of the son killing the father, then the bijlmer presents a potential reversal of the oedipal formula, in which the father threatens the son. instead of team x attacking the mechanistic attitudes of ciam for a fetishistic obsession with the objective and the quantifi able, through the bijlmer, ciam questions from beyond the grave as it were the equally fetishistic concern with the ineffable and the qualitative that characterizes its allegedly humanistic replacement” (koolhaas 1995: 867). interstices 07 le corbusier forged a symbolic representation of the feast and the disenchantment of modernity (see tafuri, 1985). although he regarded the kasbah as an urbanistic masterpiece, he could not use it directly as a model. “the kasbah can only remain what it is, outside time, outside modernity and indifferent to its fate” (20). it is the converse of the syncopated experience of time and space written into the sinuous megastructures of plan obus. the cascading arabesques isolate and threaten the kasbah. quite the opposite of this dramatic assault on the hills of fort l’empereur, vipcity displays all the resignation of mutually accepted defects. the braid and the allotment are at odds with each other, but constitute the conditions of their reciprocal existence. the choreography of vipcity is staged in front of a disillusioned crowd of housing lots. what remains today of the city is little more than commodity or spectacle. the recreation of the towers is disciplined by the cadence of their funeral march, the linear structure is merely the city’s skeleton, and the winding esplanade represents its dance of death. the unadapted city is an allegory of the desperate combat waged by the contemporary city against its dislocation. despite the gulf between them, the formation of plan obus matches the kasbah’s amphitheatre by the transposition of its syncretic qualities. the eternal everyday of the kasbah is sustained by a pact, an age-old agreement which allowed for the intensive inhabitation of this site. its body was built up through accumulation, vipcity under construction page 3, digital drawing, 2001 one nautical mile amenities for 9500 inhabitants, 2000-2004 photomontage t.o.p. offi ce 29 piece by piece, a piling that enabled it to straddle this diffi cult gradient. the perennial accord is the very condition of its existence. but the kasbah is not really unchanging; it carries on through incorporation, it is totalizing. its organic integrity is not endangered by the mutation of its cells. each can be replaced without corrupting the kasbah’s communal programme or morphology. it was on top of that complex but unifi ed body that le corbusier threw out the structures of his plan obus. a totalitarian gesture, it conquers the territory and reshapes the landscape. but its bearing is to lend itself to habitat. dwellings can be fi tted into the gigantic rack of the megastructures without any other constraint than that of shelving. form fi nds its expression in the length and movement of the course and is by no means affected by the detail of that use. however immense it may be, the difference here engaged is essentially causational. the kasbah’s morphology is effected by an awkward topography and by the federated determination of its inhabitants; that of the megastructures by the singular will to redraw the site’s scenography, and by an extensive use of modern technology. the kasbah’s syncretism is ratifi ed by the signature of machinism. the notion of the resilience of overall form, as discovered and actualized by plan obus, had considerable infl uence on post-ciam architecture and urbanism. it enabled architects to rid themselves of their attachment to the specifi city of the object, in favour of exploring the expressive force and organizing capacity of a support structure or shape established by accumulation and interconnection of a basic unit. research in this direction dominated and reunifi ed the architecture and urbanism of the second half of the 1960s. this was the period during which deleu trained as an architect and began his professional career. already at that time, he took positions that were at odds with canonical practice. his fi rst exhibition, in 1970, was presented as an announcement of his departure from architecture.22 one of the exhibits was a sheet of paper with four photographs of projects then considered as major references. deleu had boldly crossed them out. in addition to two views of the marseilles unité d’habitation, the collage showed peter cook’s plug-in-city and moshe safdie’s habitat ’67 for the montreal world fair.23 today, it is apparent that deleu’s work fi nds support in the sources he rejected at the time; the unité is, for instance, an important infl uence for the unadapted city. a repositioning, that provides for a connection of the inner streets to the system’s public infrastructure, indeed seems to take all its measure from the intentionality determining this project.24 as for plug-in-city and habitat ’67, each in its own way is also a descendant of plan obus. by piling up prefabricated modules like bunches of grapes,25 habitat ’67 recalls the visual and interrelational complexity of the kasbah. plug-in-city is like an extensive mechanism conceived as a vine to which housing pods simply have to be hooked up. 21 these pairs of towers one lying and the other standing present a series of variants on the phenomenal confi guration of the barcelona towers. in this regard see châtel (1999 & 2001b). through this arrangement, which relates to his series lessons in scale and perspective, deleu engages the building’s formal characteristics in their relationship with the spectator. 22 “luc deleu leaves architecture in the vacuum for new dimensions”, febr. 1970. 23 for a reproduction of this collage, see deleu (2002: 33). 24 see tafuri & dal co (1976: 344-45). 25 see tafuri & dal co (1976: 388). le corbusier alger : urbanisme 1930 © sabam belgium 2006. interstices 07 deleu himself sees the acts of architecture and urbanism as making available a structure or support that can lend itself to distinctive appropriation. the array of the collective is seen as a condition and guarantee of individual completion. the advent of the city would then occur in the encounter between architecture’s singular formal determination and the chorus of interpretative particular actions. in fact, this hypothesis is to be found throughout his work and serves as justifi cation for the approach adopted in the unadapted city. deleu found a convincing representation of the concept in le corbusier’s well-known sketch intended to demonstrate the freedom of habitat within the structures of plan obus.26 but this drawing, whilst a statement of the intention to retain the diversity of habitat, seems to reduce communal life to cohabitation. likewise, and equally far from providing any scheme that could lead to the creation of a community, the prototype habitat ’67 puts forward an image of the richness and complexity of built structure, while plug-in-city fl aunts itself as a technological fantasy, carefully avoiding any involvement with societal questions. the analysis and the critique of the conditions under which building happens, and of its institutional and societal context, were nevertheless of much concern in those days. it was a time of resistance and refl ection. the fact that this attitude produced no lasting results has been attributed to the inability of architects to carry this refl ection to its conclusion, which would have meant questioning their own function and their fi erce attachment to autonomy.27 among all the projects of that time, those which are still relevant today are those which stand out as having a radical approach. a project like archizoom’s no stop city: 26 he made this an epigraph to deleu (1990), an issue being entirely devoted to his work. le corbusier gave this drawing the ironic caption: “every architect will make the house he wants, just imagine!” 27 see tafuri & dal co (1976: 390). collage, 1970 31 does not make a decisive break with what went before – the modern city – but extrapolates it, intensifi es it, accelerates it. the radicals bring future time closer ... and propose a rear vision that forces one to look at what exists so as to operate its critique. the ‘project’ work amounts to giving explicit form to an invisible reality: to invent or imagine the world that is already there (rouillard, 1994: 432). all that remains in plan obus by way of eloquence and relevance to the present time is due to the shift in viewpoint brought about by its radical moves. the unadapted city is close to italy’s architettura radicale to the extent that it performs a savage extrapolation from phenomena detected in reality, but torn from their context and looked at from the new perspective of an autonomous project. vipcity is just like no stop city, potentially infi nite and isotropic. like no stop city, it turns utopia upside down, replacing an imagined fi nality by the projection of an ‘image’. it is the radicalized image of a devious present, slyly hiding beneath the bubbling of the everyday, seemingly waiting for this one occasion to loom up.28 the last two monographs on deleu’s project seem aimed at reframing it in concrete terms. in la ville inadaptée/luc deleu (theys, 2001), the project is presented against a background of site photographs, references to le corbusier’s work and images of navigation. luc deleu – urbi et orbi (deleu, 2002) contains about fi fteen full-page photographs of chandigarh today. it is clear that they must serve as imported context, illustrating the informal and apparently chaotic use of equipment and land. the pictures of the housing sectors connote the idea that the city comes to life through the interpretative adoption of its structures. but the exact role of the views of the capitol, such as that of la fosse de la considération (the trench of consideration), is more enigmatic. 28 for this idea of utopia being overturned, see rouillard (1994: 432). chandigarh building market, photo : luc deleu, © sabam interstices 07 tafuri associates the capitol’s “listening chambers” with the poetics of the ”unappeased desires” evoked in the open-air room of le corbusier’s beistégui apartment on the champs elysées (tafuri, 1985: 11).29 in that ”room surrounded by empty space” … ”where one can see only fragments of the town’s horizon”, he sees ”the last refuge, ruled by the silence and the wide”(11). it is a place ”of programmed isolation” that ”breaks with any ordinary accord”(11). this silence, which remains ”mercilessly separated from the theoretical landscape to which he entrusts his own social messages”(11), will give way to the din of plan obus. but it is the same desire, here turned into unrestrained appetite, that strikes it with the seal of alienation. the unifi cation promised by modernism would remain unattainable. the breach opened by the antithesis of ”perfect rest” and ”frenzied celebration” is endorsed by the disenchantment modelled in the oxymoron of vipcity. as a project, the unadapted city revisits architecture’s recent history, recounting its memories of illusion and disappointment. it refl ects on its condition, speculates on its task and destiny. it is in this sense that le corbusier’s work serves as a mirror. but, already now, the features of the work merge with those of the author. the specular image seems to outline an ideal of ambition and perseverance; that of an intellectual activity that claims to act as a lever on society while at the same time jealously preserving its independence. however eminent the model may be, it is bound to be a mirage. if the poetics of isolation endeavour to reforge architecture from the inside, they also stand for abandonment. by envisioning architecture as introspection they are liable to detach it from this world. by digging into it in search of depth they threaten to leave it empty. in his spiritual testimony, which betrays a large measure of bitterness, ”father corbu”30 reminds us in a profession of faith that ”nothing is transmissible but 29 apartment for charles de beistégui, paris, 1930-31. 30 le corbusier (1970). in this text he refers to himself as “père corbu.” chandigarh, capitol, the trench of consideration photo : luc deleu © sabam 33 thought, nobility of the fruit of our labours” (le corbusier, 1970: 172). the poetics of isolation dazzle us with their corollary: they designate ‘work’ as one of the last places where the transmission of meaning can be understood as reciprocal: life comes through men, or else men come through life. in this way all kinds of effects arise. look at the surface of the water ... look also at all the sky-blue fi lled with the good that man will have done ..., for in the end, it all comes back to the sea ... (le corbusier 1970: 168). references: bekaert, g. (1991). luc deleu, a self-power man. archis (4), 22-36. châtel, g. (1999). luc deleu. in de kooning, m. (ed.), horta and after, 25 masters of modern architecture in belgium (pp. 276-287). ghent: ghent university. châtel, g. (2001a). le projet d’une ville inadaptée. in theys, h. (ed.), la ville inadaptée/luc deleu (pp. 42-56). toulouse: editions ecocart. châtel, g. (2001b). les tours de barcelone. in theys, h. (ed.), la ville inadaptée/luc deleu (p.40). toulouse: editions ecocart. châtel, g. (2002). de voet en de zeemijl, een architecturale poëtica van de nabijheid en een verte. in rombauts, w. (ed.), 10 jaar cultuurprijs ku-leuven (pp. 26-34). louvain: k.u.leuven. châtel, g. & davidts, w. (2003). the lightness and seriousness of the project. janus (4), 32-37. châtel, g. (2004). car pour fi nir tout retourne à la mer – vipcity ou la mise en scène d’une fi liation. cahiers thématiques architecture, histoire/conception (ivfiliation(s)), 197-210. davidts, w. (1999). interview with luc deleu, 1st may 1998. in de meyer, r., davidts, w & verschaffel, b. (eds.), de ferraris & conscience, stills. brussels/ghent: vlaamse gemeenschap. deleu, l. (1990). earth, passengers and building. forum (34/1, march), 4-14. deleu, l. (1991). luc deleu & t.o.p. offi ce, 1967-1991, exhibition catalogue. antwerp: muhka. deleu, l. (1996). the unadapted city work in progress nai96, exhibition catalogue. rotterdam: nai publishers. deleu, l. (2002). urbi et orbi. ghent & amsterdam: ludion. le corbusier (1970). rien n’est transmissible que la pensée. in boesiger, w. (ed.), oeuvres complètes, volume 8, les dernières œuvres (pp. 168-172). zürich: editions girsberger les éditions de l’architecture artemis. koolhaas, r. (1995). las vegas of the welfare state. in o.m.a., koolhaas, r. & mau, b. s, m, l, xl (pp. 861-887). rotterdam: 010 publishers. rouillard, d. (1994). archizoom. in dethier, j. & guiheux, a. (eds.), la ville, art et architecture en europe 1870-1993 (pp.432-433). paris: editions du centre pompidou. tafuri, m. (1985). machine et mémoire. in brooks, h. a. (ed.), the le corbusier archive, vol x, new york/paris 1983-84, as translated in dutch by van der ploeg, k. wonen/tabk, (5) 10-25. tafuri, m. & dal co, f. (1976). modern architecture. new york: harry n. abrams, inc. publishers. theys, h. (ed.). (2001). la ville inadaptée/luc deleu. toulouse: editions ecocart. van der woud, a. (1983). ciam housing town planning. delft: delft university press. in t e r s t ic e s 1 9 112 p r e s e n c e interstices: journal of architecture and related arts is an open forum for the dissemination of architecture and thought. it is a non-profit journal published once a year. to remain independent, interstices relies upon institutional and private support to fund its editorial production. annual individual sponsorship is available from $500; corporate sponsorship from $1,000; and institutional sponsorship from $3,000. sponsors will receive full acknowledgement of their contribution in each issue of interstices for which they are a sponsor and on the journal’s website (https://interstices.ac.nz/ index.php/interstices). this issue is supported by school of art + design, auckland university of technology, school of architecture & planning, university of auckland (institutional sponsors) and moller architects, architectus, warren and mahoney, jasmax cheshire architects, augustus architects, acs architects and salmond reed architects (corporate sponsors) executive editors andrew douglas, julia gatley, susan hedges co-ordinating editor susan hedges issue editors andrew douglas, susan hedges, ross jenner contributors this issue nina boyd, konrad buhagiar, john dixon hunt, andrew douglas, carl douglas, guillaume dreyfuss, mark jackson, ephraim joris, felipe lanuza rilling, adrian lo, jules moloney, nicola short, jan smitheram, simon twose and stepan vaneyan design and typography catherine griffiths typefaces founders grotesk, tiempos text klim type foundry production andrew douglas, catherine griffiths, susan hedges, ross jenner, joanne mathers published by enigma : he aupiki, auckland, new zealand december 2019 issn 1170-585x (print) issn 2537-9194 (online) this work is entitled to the full protection given by the copyright act 1962 to the holders of the copyright and reproduction of any substantial passage from the work except for the educational purposes therein specified is a breach of the copyright of the author and/or publisher. this copyright extends to all forms of photocopying and any storing of material in any kind of information retrieval system. interstices: journal of architecture and related arts takes a nonexclusive copyright in the papers submitted and accepted, i.e., we reserve the right to publish and republish the paper (for instance, electronically). authors are welcome to upload their papers in published form into their institution’s research repository. they retain the right to republish their papers elsewhere, provided that they acknowledge original publication in interstices. all applications by third parties, for reproduction in any form, should be made to the executive editors. submissions the editors invite submissions of articles, reports, book and project reviews, and translations. all correspondence should be addressed to the editors, interstices, school of art + design, aut university, private bag 92006, auckland 1020, new zealand. books for review and advertising should be forwarded to the executive editors, above. notes and guidelines for contributors can be found at https://interstices.ac.nz/index. php/interstices/information_for_ contributors acknowledgements we gratefully acknowledge the support of the very many people who have contributed to the realisation and quality of interstices 19 in various ways—including, ross anderson, chris barton, mike davis, peggy deamer, mark dorrian, campbell drake, carl douglas, mark jackson, manfredo manfredini, jules moloney, maria o’connor, rafik patel, albert refiti, christoph schnoor, kathy waghorn, paul walker. thanks to catherine griffiths and joanne mathers for designing and copy editing this issue. if we have inadvertently overlooked anyone, we apologise. thanks also to the school of art + design at auckland university of technology, and the school of architecture and planning at the university of auckland. and, finally, a big thank-you to all the contributors to interstices 19. www.interstices.ac.nz editorial advisory board aotearoa/new zealand mike austin (unitec institute of technology), a.-chr. (tina) engels-schwarzpaul (auckland university of technology), dan fleming (university of waikato), gavin hipkins (university of auckland), robert jahnke (massey university), ross jenner (university of auckland), laurence simmons (university of auckland) australia suzie attiwill (rmit university), jillian hamilton (queensland university of technology), mirjana lozanovska (deakin university), john macarthur (university of queensland), jeff malpas (university of tasmania), vivian mitsogianni (rmit university), jules moloney (rmit university), deborah van der plaat (university of queensland), sam spurr (university of new south wales), paul walker (university of melbourne) germany ursula baus (frei04-publizistik, stuttgart), uta brandes (köln international school of design) italy renato rizzi (università iuav di venezia, architect trento), nigel ryan (architect, rome) sweden hélène frichot (kth royal institute of technology) tunisia bechir kenzari uk mark dorrian (edinburgh college of art), jonathan hale (university of nottingham), anthony hoete (what_architecture, london), sally jane norman (university of sussex), peg rawes (the bartlett school of architecture), joseph rykwert (emeritus paul philippe cret professor) usa peggy deamer (yale university), mark goulthorpe (mit, decoi architects paris), jonathan lamb (vanderbilt university), david leatherbarrow (university of pennsylvania), moana nepia (university of hawai’i at mānoa) colophon n t e r s t i ct i c e s 1 9i n jjoo uu rrnn aa ll oo ff aa rrcc hh it ec tu re dddd rrrreeee llllaaaa tttteeee dddd aaaa rrrttt sss a n d r the track ... extends through the site, weaves through the bracken (natural), meets and touches the hut (architecture), and continues its "journey". the "visitor" acts in the same way. the visitor's arrival is passive: to pass by, maybe, a place to rest, a place to pause , to catch one's breath. architecture (hut) is also revealed as a "moment in time"; to pause, to escape from the grandeur and shelter amongst "a minute part of the whole" . . . . this is a point, a moment, where architecture and the visitor(track), relate and meet, and share a mutual dialogue (both are in the act of pausing). both the visitor and hut leave the ground to retreat. the relationship amongst site, visitor and architecture is "understood". .. . a log lies silent once a tree, frozen, gentle, quietly sleeping, peaceful and harmless. a detail. a detail of architecture? a detail amongst the grandeur of the site, lost, forgotten, a memory, protected. a hidden detail (that no one sees), undisturbed, waiting . waiting to be found; discovered . . . . architecture to be disclosed, discussed, and realised . . . . to look beneath the skin, to unravel, unearth, realise, the potential, a secret nature, the rhythms of time, texture, colour, form, structure. to witness a thousand years, before people. i ask is this history, is this ancient times? ... to reflect to stop, to rest, to pause. i am a visitor, greetings. ... ....., __ ~..,,,, ... _ ""';~-·_, ·~ =~-=-·---4 -~" ~ ........ ,.-rrt'w.~ .. plan elevation rewi thompson carter holt harvey environmental award registered architect first place 1994 photography lynn logan ' . 101 • interstices02.indb 85 “i am”: colin mccahon genius or apostle? laurence simmons genius genius is a most diffi cult subject to talk about, seeming as it does to put us in touch with something other than ourselves, something we may never, perforce, be able to understand, while leaving us open, in the process of investigating and proclaiming it, to be read ourselves as tragic overreachers, lacking in true intellectual humility. the easy scholarly path might be to distance oneself from genius, to re-conceive of it dispassionately, hands off, so we might more accurately represent the truth of its object. or, should that be, its subjects? but just as the closer we seem to approach it the more unknowable it appears, so the more distance we place between it and ourselves the more unknowable genius also seems in its very aloofness. it could be that the question of genius consists in the absence of a relation to knowing. this absence of relation invites at least two different types of evaluation, inexhaustible and contradictory: fi rst there are those who seek to wage war on genius, to chop off its self-conceited head should it appear above the parapet, those who feel threatened by genius and desire ‘to chop down tall poppies’, as we so often say in poppy-less new zealand; and then there are those who relinquish themselves in front of it, lay down in a stupor of timidity and awe that fi nally resolves itself in outright passivity. what links these two efforts, in terms of shared rhetorical energy, is sheer intimidation of mind where language, either through exasperation or linguistic lassitude a sort of stammer of fury or ineptitude meets its unmaking. despite all these problems, i am going to stick with genius, to track it and trace it, to open myself to it (oh, that some of it might rub off!), to discover in each (nearly missed) encounter with it a fundamental inability to know it, completely or objectively, and a fundamental inability to represent it. of course, my encounter here, so far, refl ects that encounter with genie, or genius, which kant faces on the margins of several of his texts. genius is a natural endowment, deep, strange and mysterious. we ought not to expect, kant claims, that genius can explain itself. kant argues that the genius does not himself know; he has not learned and cannot teach what he has produced. elsewhere kant specifi es that we are not dealing with a fl ash of something like inspiration, but rather with the slow and even painful process of improvement.1 this is why genius fl ashes, like an instantaneous phenomenon which manifests itself in intervals, and then disappears again; it cannot be turned on at will like a light. all of this — the occasion of luminous self-dissemination, of the violent fl ash and gaiety of a sudden crisis and loss (but perhaps it is not loss since genius was never sought) of self-knowledge, the invention of the unteachable and unlearnable for kant, exceeds the structure of the possibility of all that which belongs to the specifi cally germanic. genius comes from elsewhere, it arises on foreign territory; by extension, it is foreign 1 genius, kant also says, is the talent capable of “discovering that which cannot be taught or learned” (1974: 234). interstices 07 to philosophy, or at least to the german “temperament of cold refl ection” (kant, 1974 [1798]: 233). but if genius is seen to yield to thought, to surrender and annex itself to the strength of philosophy, this must derive from the way it resists substantialization into an entity that would be opposable to thought. in this sense, although deriving from elsewhere, the absence of a relation to knowing that is genius, is something that can be known. while not offering a detailed history of the concept of genius, i shall draw upon a selection of philosophical perspectives to show how genius entails a process of othering that splits the individual from their gift. individual or individuation? in giorgio agamben’s short essay on “genius”, where he advances a theory of the subject reformulated as the relationship between genius and ‘i’,2 the concept of genius represents “in some way the divine essence of the self” (2006: 94). this implies that the human being is not only consciousness, but that an impersonal, pre-individual element also lives inside us to whose spur we must constantly respond. the subject, suggests agamben, is not an essence but rather a fi eld of tensions that is covered by two joined but opposing forces, moving from the individual to the impersonal and vice-versa. the human being is the result of a complicated dialectic between a part that is impersonal, and not (yet) isolated, and another side marked by individual experience. these forces intersect and they separate out; they can never perfectly merge nor can they completely free themselves from the other. genius is the most intimate but also the most impersonal part of us: “the personalization of that, within us, which surpasses and exceeds ourselves” (95). agamben suggests, “to live with genius means, in this way, to live in the intimacy of an alien being” (96). according to agamben, we all need to come to an accommodation with genius, ”with that inside us which does not belong to us” (98). let us take the example of the writer: the desire to write signifi es an impersonal power to write somewhere inside me. the paradox is that i write to become impersonal. however, by writing i become identifi ed as the author of this or that work, which in turn becomes personalized. thus, says agamben, i perforce distance myself “from genius, who may never have the form of an ‘i’, and even less that of an author” (96). every effort of my authorial ‘i’ to appropriate genius is destined to fail, for “only a work that is revoked and undone can be worthy of genius” (96). genius or apostle? in both his aesthetic pseudonymous works, and those ethical and religious writings published under his own name, kierkegaard reminds us that he speaks without authority. he says in his essay “on my work as an author”, “from the very beginning, i have stressed and repeated unchanged that i was ‘without authority’. i regard myself rather as a reader of the books, not as the author” (1998a [1851]: 12). the question of authorship is covered more extensively by kierkegaard in the book on adler of which only one chapter, entitled ”of the difference between a genius and an apostle”, was published during kierkegaard’s lifetime. it responded to the writings of adolf peter adler (1812-1869), a minor 2 genius is linked etymologically with generare, or generation as the personifi cation of sexual energy, and ingenium as the apex of innate physical and moral qualities of the person who comes into being. 87 danish preacher. in 1843 adler published a collection of his sermons in which he distinguished between those he had written in the normal manner, and those he had written assisted by what he called the spirit. the following year he was suspended by the bishop of mynster and in 1845, following an inquiry, he was deposed. adler later conceded his revelation was a mistake; but then, to make matters worse, he declared that his sermons of revelation had really been works of his genius. kierkegaard’s writing about adler is a mixture of sympathy for someone who has suffered at the hands of authority, and frustration with someone who, he claims, is confused. he also understands adler as a representative of his age, someone who embodies all the contemporary confusion about questions of authority and revelation in the nineteenth century. kierkegaard asserts that adler confuses the categories of genius and divine revelation, or, as he puts it, adler is confused between the state of a genius and that of an apostle, who is associated with the absolute (the religious) and speaking with (divine) authority. what, then, asks kierkegaard, is the nature of authority: is it about doctrinal profundity, excellence or brilliance? he thinks not, since the difference between a learner and a teacher is not simply about understanding the doctrine, but also about “a specifi c quality that enters from somewhere else and qualitatively asserts itself precisely when the content of the statement or the act is made a matter of indifference aesthetically” (1998b [1848]: 175). kierkegaard notes that the apostle speaks directly and under inspiration, and hence with authority. the genius has no such authority. first, the genius belongs to the sphere of immanence, the apostle to the sphere of transcendence (174). the original contributions of genius will eventually be assimilated by others, whereas those of an apostle retain forever their startling newness. secondly, genius is what it is out of its own resources, whereas apostles are apostles by virtue of being appointed by divine authority. thirdly, the goal of genius is fulfi lled in the completion of an immanent work of genius, while an apostle carries out work only in order to fulfi l an “absolute paradoxical teleology”, or a purpose that transcends the work itself (175). thus authority is not immanent but transcendent; it is not rational but paradoxical; it is not a matter of content but of otherness or heterogeneity, of coming from elsewhere. kierkegaard reverses the traditional view of genius by declaring the apostle to be the anti-genius: qualitatively different, a genius and an apostle belong each in different qualitative spheres of immanence and transcendence. when kierkegaard defi nes the genius by what he is by himself (in himself), and an apostle by what he is by his divine authority, he refers to the traditional defi nition of genius as a passive endowment or gift that has no active component. “genius, as the word itself says (ingenium, the innate, primitivity (primus), originality (origo), pristineness, etc.), is immediacy, natural qualifi cations the genius is born” (175). kierkegaard’s genius is only a temporary exception and paradox, while the apostle is absolute. a genius may be paradoxical in his fi rst communication, but the more he comes to himself the more the paradoxical vanishes. the apostle is fi rst and foremost difference: “it is different with an apostle. the word itself (it means ‘one who is sent’ in greek) indicates the difference. an apostle is not born; an apostle is a man who is called and appointed by god and sent by him on a mission” (176). this is what kierkegaard designates as “the paradoxical-religious relation” (181). interstices 07 in philosophical fragments (1985 [1844]), kierkegaard makes a distinction between philosophy and theology over this question of the transferential relationship to truth. whereas, in traditional philosophy, a philosopher like socrates is only the midwife for a timeless and eternal truth, in christian doxa the truth of a statement lies, not in what is said, but, in the authority of the one who speaks. the truth of christ’s message lies not in any actual content but in the very fact that christ said it. this is the meaning behind kierkegaard’s insistence, undoubtedly a little strange to our ears, that those who believe what christ is saying because of what he says, reveal themselves not to be christian: christians, on the contrary, believe what christ is saying because it is said by christ (93). yet it is not quite as simple as this, for despite his absolute personal authority, christ is also only an empty vessel for the word of another. in other words, christ only possesses authority because he carries the higher transcendent word of god. it is in what he transmits and not in christ himself that his power lies. or, to use kierkegaard’s own distinction, christ is not so much a genius as an apostle. this seems to pose a dilemma, for while the authority of christ lies not in what he says but only in his personal authority, he only retains this personal authority insofar as he transmits directly and without mediation the word of god. what then lies at the impossible intersection of these two sets christ’s life and his teachings? how may we think together these two elements that at once exclude and necessitate each other? practical religion the second chapter of the letter of james, especially verses 17-21, was søren kierkegaard’s favorite passage of scripture. “yea, a man may say, thou hast faith, and i have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and i will shew thee my faith by my works” (james 2: 18 king james version). 3 for kierkegaard, this was an important parable about the reading of scripture. taking up the metaphor, he argued for an understanding of god’s word as a mirror in which one should observe oneself and not merely as a doctrine, “something impersonal and objective”. for, if you want to relate impersonally (objectively) to god’s word, there can be no question of looking at yourself in the mirror, because it takes a personality, an i, to look at oneself in a mirror … while reading god’s word you must incessantly say to yourself: it is i to whom it is speaking; it is i about whom it is speaking (1990 [1851]: 43-44). i want to suggest that this statement of kierkegaard’s is critical to colin mccahon’s understanding of his own painting, and is also an effective mechanism for considering how his use of biblical quotations in painting can be conceived autobiographically. i shall endeavour to weave all these themes together through an examination of a series of works by mccahon entitled practical religion, in particular the subgroup based on the letter of james. the most elemental feature of these works is their form. these paintings, now popularly known as scrolls, are crayon and wash texts on blank wallpaper stock. 3 kierkegaard declared the letter of james to be his only love, to which he returned again and again. 89 according to mccahon scholar and biographer gordon h. brown, “the scrolls were all produced in 1969, most during august or september” (2003: 3). mccahon eventually completed 72 scrolls that were hung together edge to edge to create an installation at the barry lett galleries in october 1969, of which practical religion, containing instructions for everyday life drawn from the letter of james, was a subgroup. in terms of art historical tradition, mccahon’s paintings also allude to the visualization of oral sequences of words and sentences painted on a scroll, frequently found in renaissance paintings.4 mccahon’s choice to illustrate (or appropriate?) the letter of james is as unusual as kierkegaard’s appreciation of it was. in the seventeenth century, luther had dismissed the letter as “an epistle of straw”, and it was far from popular in the twentieth century – often rejected as lacking unity (williams, 1965: 92). this raises another point about the practical religion subseries, the question of its address. the key to understanding james is the rhetorical fi gure of paraenesis or protrepsis, an exhortation that employs traditional ethical teaching and consists mainly of short sayings and commands. james is full of these: “do not deceive yourselves, my friends” (1: 16); “only be sure that you act on the message and do not merely listen” (1: 22); “come close to god, and he will come close to you” (4: 8). the letter begins with the stereotypical traditional epistolary form of opening (of x to y), “from james, a servant of god and of the lord jesus christ. greetings to the twelve tribes dispersed throughout the world” (james 1: 1). the question of address raises the question of authorship and, in the case of mccahon’s painting, the question of the appropriation of another’s (james’s) address. this address, in using words of another, implies a certain self-absence. when mccahon calls up speech, or at least a voice, we might say that his is an avowal, in the sense of the root of the english word avow to call to one’s aid the voice or speech of another.5 the advocate, another word from the same root, is called to speak in place of the other, to lend his or her voice to the other’s cause. i want to argue that this process is embedded in the selections from the letter of james which mccahon chooses to illustrate. as the body is dead … (1969), a painting on hardboard, draws upon james 2 (not 3 as mccahon incorrectly suggests in the upper right corner), verses 16, 18 and 26, from a section that looks at the relation between faith and action.6 i want refl ect upon the two texts in the lower half of the painting. the wider textual context for the phrase is verse 18: but someone may object “here is one who claims to have faith and another who points to his deeds.” to which i reply: “prove to me that this faith you speak of is real though not accompanied by deeds, and by my deeds i will prove to you my faith” (james 2: 18 new english bible, emphases added). part of james’s reply (italicized) is quoted by mccahon, and it is this very verse which, in giving the views of an unidentifi ed objector, is ambiguous. mccahon gives the response to the unnamed objector. we need to ask who is the person speaking? who is the objector? is he speaking as a friend or opponent of james? could the person speaking (objecting) be james himself, or james projecting himself? the words mccahon adopted from the new english bible, “to which i reply”, are not to be found in the greek original. that is, there is nothing in the 4 for instance, in jacobello del fiore’s 1421 justice between the archangels michael and gabriel. in renaissance painting a scroll often identifi ed its bearer as an old testament prophet. the inscriptions on these scrolls were often legible, especially when the individual was associated with a familiar text, such as the ‘ecce angelus dei’ of st john the baptist. in many cases the writing was illegible or false, for example fi ctive hebrew. a scroll also often signifi ed speech and sometimes emanated from the speaker’s mouth while a codex signifi ed writing. the most familiar example of visualized speech is the dialogue between gabriel and the virgin mary at the annunciation. see sparrow (1969) and covi (1986). 5 voice is a multi-semic notion with divergent meanings. the grammatical category of voice refers to the speaker of an utterance, the implicit or explicit ‘i’ supposedly speaking. it also refers to the form in which this subject speaks, the register. in the analysis of narratives, the concept enables us to address the question ‘who speaks? ’ and thus almost automatically entails the question of intention. with its connotation of bodiliness the term voice brings to mind jacques derrida’s critique of the preference for voice over writing in of grammatology. for a discussion of the voice of prophetic suffering in mccahon see pound (1993: 3-12). 6 colin mccahon, as the body is dead … (james 3: practical religion), 1969, acrylic on hardboard, private collection, auckland, [cm 1625]. interstices 07 greek to make it clear that a change of speaker is intended, which would imply that james speaks the words of the objector, too. the phrase reproduced in capitals from verse 16 at the bottom of the painting is similarly fraught with ambiguity. the wider textual context for this phrase is: my brothers, what use is it for a man to say he has faith when he does nothing to show it? can that faith save him? suppose a brother or sister is in rags with not enough food for the day, and one of you says, ”good luck to you, keep yourselves warm, and have plenty to eat”, but does nothing to supply their bodily needs, what is the good of that? so with faith; if it does not lead to action, it is in itself a lifeless thing (james 2: 14-17, emphases added). “good luck to you ...” is a voice projected by the voice of james on to one of us, you or i. in some way we are made to say this phrase: “one of you says” it tells us. but it is also a phrase that comes from the outside, that is uttered by james and in turn avowed by mccahon in his painting. mccahon, too, makes us speak the phrase by putting it in quotation marks. in both examples, the question ‘who speaks?’ is thus foregrounded through the problems of trying to project mccahon’s voice into the textual space of the painting, and our own imbrication as reader/spectators in its saying. in a sense, the ‘who speaks?’ is doubly removed, for the voice is lifted from its original reference in the new english bible which already contains a shadowy interlocutor whether that be the objector, or ourselves or ultimately, of course, god. mccahon’s work also raises important methodological questions. what does it mean to represent the voice in painting, silently, pictorially? how can the word (or the word) be sent to sight? where is the site of that sending? how might we hear the voice with our eye, or with our ‘i’? mccahon’s work implies a shift of both the voice and its signs towards the fi gural. it explores the connection between voice and motifs of visual representation, where the voice is manifested in the syncopes of the fi gurative mechanism, the signs that mark the space between saying and inscription. his choice and painting of text strains towards the moments where the force of the voice shows itself to the gaze, and where it reveals the things that allow us to hear a voice in painting. these works struggle with, and through, the attempt to make the force of the voice visible. this struggle is also reinforced by the way the words are painted: how the section referencing the living deeds of faith is placed above the horizontal line we might take to represent the earth’s surface; how the capital “p” of “prove” and the word “accompanied” are given special painterly emphasis. even through its very materiality, mccahon’s painting in this instance can be understood as a theoretical object that interrogates the relations of convertibility between saying and seeing. this relation is heightened in those of mccahon’s paintings which take the word as their subject matter. the presence of the voice in these paintings does not only have to do with a sequence articulated in words or sentences on the scroll or painting that might be read, but it resides in the moments in which a given sentence or formula was pronounced. let me offer a few more examples from practical religion. “a word with you …”, from james 4: 13-17, begins one scroll.7 the voice (of james? of mccahon?) ascribes again a voice for you and i: “you who say, ‘today or tomorrow we will go 7 colin mccahon, a word with you … (james 5: practical religion), 1969, conte crayon on wallpaper stock, private collection, [cm 56]. 91 off to such and such a town and spend a year there trading and making money’” (13, emphasis added); and “what you ought to say is: ‘if it be the lord’s will, we shall live to do this or that’” (15, emphasis added). the letter of james also thematicizes the question of speech, the importance and the dangers of the tongue. it is not by chance that in the fi rst scroll i referred to, at the bottom of the text separated out from the rest, we fi nd the verse: “so with the tongue. it is a small member but it can make huge claims” (james 3: 5).8 two scrolls, based on the text from the letter, look at the consequences of uncontrolled speech. “and the tongue is in effect a fi re” (6), “out of the same mouth come praises and curses” (10) (james 3: 6-12 and 10-12).9 it is also signifi cant that an important painting like victory over death 2 (1970), which i cannot discuss here, has recently been read, with its monumental ‘i am’, as intensifying “the uncertainty that surrounds the fi gure of the written ‘i’ in mccahon’s art” (smythe, 2004: 28). while not labelling it as such on the canvas, mccahon was careful to note in his survey exhibition catalogue that this painting “belongs to the practical religion series a simple i am at fi rst. but not so simple really as doubts do come in here too. i believe, but don’t believe” (1972: 29).10 (auto)biography mccahon’s work has long been studied from an (auto)biographical perspective, relying on the artist’s own statements to analyse his paintings. until recently, the fi gure of the painter colin mccahon may have profoundly affected critical response to his work, perhaps even straight-jacketed it. “my painting is almost entirely autobiographical — it tells you where i am at any given point, where i am living and the direction i am pointing in”, claims mccahon (26). i am intrigued by the notion of mccahon somehow ‘destining’ or ‘programming’ his fate, how his work is actually about this destiny or destination and how it both predicts and creates for itself a future. this is, indeed, close to the idea of religious prophecy (and thus can be linked to mccahon’s subject matter), but this sense of fate or destiny cannot be separated from the day-to-day machinations of actually creating an artistic reputation in a small settler culture with a nascent art market. again, the point here is that this sense of destiny is not to be thought of as somehow contrary to mccahon’s religious beliefs (either in the sense of a willless predestination or a lack of christian charity), but is absolutely the expression of them. in other words, mccahon’s religiosity and his art-world manipulations should not be seen as opposed: the two are absolutely the same thing. it should also be clear that i do not fi nd mccahon’s actions, in a moral sense, reprehensible in any way.11 as the fi rst stage of this investigation let me briefl y examine the actual specifi cs and mechanics of the production of mccahon’s reputation; how he systematically set about to do all the things possible that would ensure his work’s future, to diminish his rivals, etc. in the early 1940s mccahon worked in relative obscurity and had little in the way of a media profi le. however, during 1947 and 1948, mccahon’s public profi le swung to the opposite extreme, as he consciously organized a medley of one-person shows at various locations throughout the entire country: dunedin’s modern books, the lower hutt public library, the helen hitchings gallery in wellington, amalgamated studios in auckland, numerous 8 colin mccahon, my brothers not many among you … (james 3: practical religion), 1969, water-based crayon and wash on wallpaper stock, [cm 63]. 9 respectively, what a huge stack of timber… (james 3: practical religion), 1969, conte crayon on wallpaper stock, private collection, [cm 79]; and out of the same mouth come praises … (james 3: practical religion, 1969, charcoal and traces of watercolour on wallpaper stock, private collection, [cm 960]. 10 another painting which does contain the inscription is the equally monumental practical religion: the resurrection of lazarus showing mt martha (1969-70). see my discussion of this work (2003: 11-27). 11 my itinerary is selective and i am drawing upon the copious detail of a recent superbly researched phd thesis on mccahon by richard lummis (2004). interstices 07 group shows in christchurch. although these venues might seem inauspicious to us today, this frenzied exposure was a remarkable feat in the cultural context of the day, and mccahon’s stock accordingly rose. he was taken up as the critics’ cause célèbre and these exhibitions generated over 19 published critical responses, including those from a.r.d. fairburn, james k. baxter, j.c. beaglehole, rita angus, louis johnson and charles brasch. at this early point mccahon’s art was visited and sustained by some of new zealand’s most articulate voices. mccahon’s ascendancy was meteoric, and the volume of writing his work provoked was unprecedented. this was even more remarkable in that the arts scene of the time was devoid of even the most rudimentary infrastructures that might aid any aspiring career-minded artist. the making of mccahon as a fi gure of national notoriety also had much to do with his intimacy with charles brasch, most obviously in brasch’s capacity as editor of landfall. but brasch also took on mccahon as a talent in need of fostering, mentoring and fi nancing. not only did he regularly buy works directly, he also facilitated commissions, gifted money and fi nanced mccahon’s trip to australia in 1951. the activities of the writers who helped put mccahon on the map are well-documented in the archives and the critical literature. mccahon has often been characterized, and increasingly mythologized, as a victim of widespread critical and ad hominem hostility particularly at the outset of his career. in contrast to these sentimental accounts of the artist’s heroic struggle it would be more profi table to establish how the impediments, and at times negative response, in fact contributed to the discursive invention and institutionalization of mccahon, how the negative talk might have helped a prominent profi le. profanation let me now see if i can bring my various threads together. what holds together agamben’s reformulation of the subject as a process of individuation between ‘i’ and genius, kierkegaard’s distinction between a genius and an apostle, and mccahon’s insistence upon practical religion and his worldliness as a sign of his genius, is that they all involve a mediation between the sacred and profane. before proceeding any further, it is necessary to distinguish here between secularization and profanation. secularization is a form of displacement which leaves basic forces intact; for example, the secularization of theological concepts of politics simply shifts heavenly power to an earthly form but leaves intact the nature of that power. profanation, on the other hand, implies a neutralization of that which is profaned. once it has been profaned, that which was separate and untouchable loses its aura and is returned to use. sacer (sacred) is, in latin, that which is separated, put aside, subtracted from common usage and, in opposition, profane is that which escapes this separation (etymologically pro fanum means before, or outside, the temple). to profane something signifi es touching the sacred in order to liberate it. agamben notes: “to profane signifi es opening the possibility of a special form of negligence, which ignores the separation, or rather, makes a special use of it” (2005: 85). one of those special uses, i have attempted to argue here, is art or more precisely painting. within the destining or programming of a career, the authenticity of a work of art is reduced to an institutional framing, and to a signature whose reference is precisely the possibility of commodifi cation. as we have seen, the circula 93 tion of mccahon’s painting cannot do without myths, prophets, paymasters and priests explaining and interpreting it, and i fear that i may have become just one more in that long line. this is not to deny that commodifi cation may incorporate within it the paradox of refl exivity. the problem that the work undergoes as its condition of existence (the impossibility of avoiding the art system) becomes, or can be read as, the theme of the work, its destiny. in this sense, mccahon’s work is about its self, its own fate, as it attempts to mediate between the spiritual and the practical, the sacred and the profane. this is why, in a version of ventriloquism, we fi nd mccahon taking on a voice, to lose his own voice, to fi nd it again. as agamben has reminded us in an interview: when your life becomes a work of art, you are not the cause of it. … at this point you feel your own life and yourself as something ‘thought’, but the subject, the author, is no longer there. the construction of life coincides with what foucault referred to as ‘se deprendre de soi’ (2004: 613). foucault’s phrase is diffi cult to translate; it has all the connotations of ‘to shake free of the self’, ‘getting rid of oneself’, ‘detaching oneself from oneself’, ‘unlearning oneself’, ‘taking oneself out of oneself’. genius is an issue here precisely because it evades our grasp and takes us out of ourselves. as agamben has noted, “when we love someone we don’t really love his genius, nor his character (and even less his “i”), but we love the special way he has of eluding both of these” (2006: 9). despite, but also because of, his best intentions, mccahon himself cannot fall outside of the structure of passage from the profane to the sacred and the sacred to the profane, nor can his work. so we might say that mccahon’s work falls between jean-luc nancy’s two precepts regarding the contemporary christian framework: “the only current christianity is one that contemplates the present possibility of its negation”; and “the only current atheism is one that contemplates the reality of its christian roots” (nancy, 2001: 113). this is the exceptional place that mccahon occupies in terms of the religious today. it is an exceptional place less in terms of the question of the religious than in terms of the religious as a question.12 let me conclude, then, by suggesting that mccahon was no apostle, despite his aspirations to be one, but he was perhaps a genius. references agamben, g. (2004). an interview with giorgio agamben. interview by ulrich raulff in german law journal (5, 5 ), 609-614. agamben, g. (2005). profanazioni. rome: nottetempo. agamben, g. (2006). genius (l. simmons, trans.). interstices: a journal of architecture and related arts (7), 94-99 brown, g. h. (2003). an exploratory look at colin mccahon’s use of ‘a letter to hebrews’. in r. taberner (ed.), colin mccahon: a question of faith. papers from a seminar. auckland: auckland city art gallery. 12 see my discussion of mccahon’s relationship to the religious as an example of “what derrida has identifi ed as ‘religion without religion’, a philosophical discourse that would articulate the structural possibility of the religious without professing a determinate, orthodox faith” (2003: 27). interstices 07 covi, d. (1986). the inscription in fifteenth century florentine painting. new york: garland publishing. kant, i. (1974). anthropology from a pragmatic point of view (m. j. mcgregor, trans.). the hague: martinus njhoff. kierkegaard, s. (1985). philosophical fragments/johannes climacus. kierkegaard’s writings 7 (h. v. hong and e. h. hong, trans.). princeton: princeton university press. kierkegaard, s. (1990). for self-examination: judge for yourself! kierkegaard’s writings 21 (h. v. hong and e. h. hong, trans.). princeton: princeton university press. kierkegaard, s. (1998a). the point of view. kierkegaard’s writings 22 (h. v. hong and e. h. hong, trans.). princeton: princeton university press. kierkegaard, s. (1998b). the book on adler kierkegaard’s writings 24 (h. v. hong and e. h. hong, trans.). princeton: princeton university press. lummis, r. (2004). modelling the new zealand artist: rita angus and colin mccahon. unpublished dissertation for the degree of doctor of philosophy, university of otago, dunedin. mccahon, c. (1972). colin mccahon/a survey exhibition. auckland: auckland city art gallery. nancy, j-l. (2001). the deconstruction of christianity. in h. de vries (ed.), religion and media. stanford: stanford university press: 112-130. pound, f. (1993). endless yet never: death, the prophetic voice and mccahon’s last painting. in colin mccahon: the last painting. auckland: peter webb galleries: 3-12. simmons, l. (2003). “i shall go and wake him”: the fi gura of lazarus in colin mccahon’s painting. in r. taberner (ed.), colin mccahon: a question of faith. papers from a seminar. auckland: auckland city art gallery: 11-27. smythe, l. (2004). bill culbert/colin mccahon. auckland: np. sparrow, j. (1969). visible words: a study of inscriptions in and as books and works of art. cambridge: cambridge university press. williams, r. r. (ed.). (1965). the letters of john and james. commentary on the three letters of john and the letter of james. cambridge: cambridge university press. interstices02.indb interstices 07 leonhard emmerling, the new director of aut’s st paul st gallery, put together this show, his fi rst here, in just three months. as will happen with immigrant curators, it juxtaposes the culture he comes from with the culture he is beginning to fi nd here. in this show, he works with german artists and bill viola side-byside with paintings and drawings by colin mccahon and stephen bambury. the main gallery space is about as not-white-cube as you can get: irregular walls and angles, exposed services in a ceiling that feels oppressively low for the width of the space, one long wall and two short, interrupted by a window, more like a loading-bay than a gallery. this set-up fully tests curators’ ability to make anything coherent. leonhard emmerling does well: he has undoubtedly got a good eye for hanging a show, giving work that needs slow thoughtful looking plenty of wall-space; making major juxtapositions out of the different framing effects of the walls; not afraid of irregularities in the lines and groupings on the longest wall; and happy to mix – not easy to do – drawing, painting, photography and, in the two more regular shaped rooms, video. the terms for coherence for this show are laid out in his interesting introductory essay. it covers the ground: landscape as a questioning of mediation of perception; seeing revealed as visionary and seeking the sublime. that works well with most of the imported work, putting in high-relief questions of light, the eye, the perception of something seen as out there, but necessarily elusive and illusionary. in most of them, the instrumentation of lens/camera attempts to make it permanent, fi xed, and pieter rösel’s paintings attempt to do likewise. with bill viola’s chott el djerid video, it is mirages – unnameable constantly shifting images from which slowly fi gures appear, a truck maybe, a camel, motor-bikes; with rösel’s it is again mirages, but unreachable by plein-air painting, because the images are always in fl ux and such painting implies only one sighting of something, more or less constant, pace monet. in a digital video by gerhardt mantz, the views of changing landscape are all fabricated, manipulations evidently schematised by some apparently inner vision. even photography here is, quite properly, problematic as two pairs of two variant views by sylvia henrich dispose of the seemingly evident singularity of what it can say of a place. high up on the gallery’s one pillar, that everyone tries to ignore, is the work that emmerling regards as a paradigm for the whole: bernhard härtter’s egg, a shining stainless steel ovoid, refl ecting in its own re-stating rather than dis-torting mirror-surface whatever for whoever as they pass. these works sweetly cover the ground. the curator’s intelligence shines in the conceptual tightness of the show and the recognition of variations on a central issue among the overseas works. but whether this conception works for the local content is not so clear. it runs into diffi culties with colin mccahon’s ‘necessary protection’ painting and drawing straight away. even the roughest drawings of the series are not the recordings of an eye for a scene. characteristically, as with the northland panels, a decade landscape / inscape review by tony green landscape/inscape exhibition at st paul st gallery april 27 – may 28, 2006 123 earlier, they were done from memory, in the studio. mccahon, in his art, resists every kind of pictorial blandishments, impurities of sense – colour, fi ne fi nish, and charm. it cannot accept pure formal abstraction, because that eliminates exactly the justifi cation for painting, the overriding moral purpose that mccahon clings to. it is diffi cult to see this as other than founded on fear of the biblical taboo on images. his landscapes are, instead, the gradual and diffi cult transformations of characteristic blocks of light and dark – generalities of a scene, never particulars, into a fi eld fi lled with symbols. in their furthest extension, the large necessary protection canvases, the once-seen scene is a lingering specifi c local reference, alongside moral readings that result from a meditation on the crucifi xion. this puritanical art does not elude, however, the beauty of surface effect, the look, of his paintings and drawings, which does not hide their simple feeling for materials, nor spoil moral utterance with virtuoso displays of decoration. instead, with the craft pared down to the most direct means, they they are testaments to integrity. stephen bambury, as emmerling recognises, reverses that which in mccahon’s procedure pushes away from pictorial landscape scene to moral utterance. the little southland panels and the sight line (ix) oaia island are both variants of mccahon images. bambury begins with some simplicity of formal arrangement, but in the working of the materials, allows for the resonance of the formal with those who have used it before, and that the formal carries a symbolic weight. further, his working of medium, resin or patinated metal, is always open to the aleatoric. he allows the medium to throw out suggestions of how paint surface or metal patination can be looked at as fl eeting unstable landscape-like images. in his continuing meditation on mccahon’s painting, bambury, though capable of a range of feeling from the gentlest, as in the small pieces, to terrible intensity in the large trowelled orange resin [priests’ robes] and streaked graphite of angkor ii. in all respects, even in its plain reference to buddhist culture within the format of mccahon’s crucifi xion/necessary protection, bambury is performing his necessary corrections to mccahon. in his opening up of abstraction’ to image, to symbol, to states of feeling, to landscape, bambury fi ts better with the refl ections on landscape in the rest of the show. this show, with its high quality work by artists’ rarely, if ever, seen here before, has usefully opened up some critical issues. bernhard härtter, egg, 1998, metal, private collection, auckland interstices02.indb interstices 07 the passion of ignorance review by lucy holmes at a conference on tertiary education management, in july 2006, kuni jenkins mentioned lacanian psychoanalysis and its principle of the passion of ignorance.1 a leading academic making a place for ignorance seems surprising, as does reference to a fi eld of psychoanalysis yet to fi nd a place, either as theory or as clinical practice, in a new zealand tertiary institution. the fi rst chapter of knowing nothing, staying stupid intimates why this may be so. the analyst’s passion of ignorance is defi ned, not as the absence of knowledge, but as the recognition of the limits of knowledge: as knowledge does not hold all the answers, so the analyst’s knowledge must not be presented as the truth about the patient (25-26). lacanian psychoanalysis focuses not only on the speech of each unique person within a specifi c social formation, but also on how speech is unconsciously marked by the satisfaction and suffering driving the subject’s words. nobus and quinn’s book links these clinical concerns to epistemology, making the case that the unconscious presents us with the limits of our knowledge; its truth is the “human being’s incapacity to master all knowledge owing to the absence of a knowing agency at the level of the unconscious” (49). in the context of tertiary education, to speak of the passion of ignorance implies a challenge to education to account for the ‘other’ of academic reason. in contrast to a lacanian epistemology, contemporary universities tend to rationalise all knowledge in terms of its market value whose goal is social and economic success (121-122). this implicit denial of the failure and fall of knowledge results in a mania for progress and completion, paradoxically working to hinder the development of academic knowledge (196). similar criticisms have been made of new zealand tertiary education; the knowledge economy provides more funds for those bodies of knowledge “that support competition and economic growth” (harvey, 2003: 4). using lacan’s discourse theory, nobus and quinn explain how the discourse of the university always serves a master – in this case the economy and the market place of ideas. their book explains an important difference between those discourse theories in which ideology fi nds its support in the social practice of language, and lacan’s “discourses [which] are not to be used as keys to the meaning of speech, but as a means of separating speech from meaning” (2005: 128). this separation makes explicit a distinction between the truth of the unconscious as a causal function that “drives and structures speech”, and the view upheld by the knowledge economy of “truth as a consciously achieved effect” (132). the conscious use of speech aims to convey a certain meaning. however, the unconscious undermines intended meaning and its reception; thus, communication entails its failure, no matter how skilled the speaker. in knowing nothing, staying stupid, the role of applied psychoanalysis, and how it might avoid being yet another interpretive procedure servicing the market place, dany nobus and malcolm quinn, knowing nothing, staying stupid: elements for a psychoanalytic epistemology. london: routledge, 2005. 1 2006, 3-4 july. association for tertiary education managers, new zealand branch conference. bay of plenty polytechnic, tauranga. kuni jenkins is interim chief executive offi cer of te whare wanaanga o awanuiarangi, whakatane. 111 is a key question. nobus and quinn present various philosophical and artistic hoaxes – žižek, sokal and duchamp – to explain how the logic of the unconscious redirects the search for an interpretive truth. žižek’s hoax involved his interpretation of a painting about which he knew nothing. however, his listeners, at an art round table, accepted it as a successful interpretation. the hoax is used in his critique of cultural studies’ use of theory to highlight the “radical apathy at the very heart of today’s cultural studies” (žižek, 2001: 6, 130). adding a further twist to the critique, nobus and quinn point out that žižek falls into his own trap when he later applies the same interpretative approach as a legitimate method; thus the critical force of the hoax is lost, changing neither “the relations of ‘the žižekian fi eld’ that secured him a place at the art round table”, nor “the relations within the market place of ideas in which the public discourse on art and psychoanalysis is contained” (2005: 178). as žižek’s readers, we are in the same position as the participants of the art round table, uncritically accepting interpretative mastery. this is a position shared by the editors of the journal social text when they accepted alan sokal’s paper on the basis of the author’s credentials, despite his fraudulent use of cultural theory. sokal disturbed the realm of academic reason by showing that cultural theory (including postmodernism and lacanian theory) is nonsense, a mistaken belief. however, nobus and quinn claim that the consequence of sokal’s hoax demonstrates that “the exchange of nonsense” is able to make perfect sense (190). the affair underlined how the stupidity of signifi ers (i.e., the style of theory-speak used by sokal) constructed an artifi ce, a fabrication, effectively exposing the manoeuvres of academic speech for which there are no “academic subjects to speak, receive, or understand it” (181). the consequences of the hoax exemplify the lacanian theory of discourse, where the separation of speech from meaning may produce an effect that the author did not intend: sokal, unwittingly, proved that lacan makes sense. knowing nothing, staying stupid examines the effects of the hoax on an institutional critique. pierre bourdieu’s admission that his institutional critique ironically perpetuated the success of those institutions, introduces a discussion of duchamp’s submission to the new york independents’ show as an intervention leading to institutional failure and the fall of knowledge. rather than contributing to the independents’ show’s progressive aims – of allowing anyone to enter an art show – duchamp’s action averted institutional and discursive ideals by highlighting progress’ latent possibility of failure (184). for nobus and quinn, this action operates in the same way as the psychical object or artifi ce, which is constructed on the basis of the unconscious effects in speech, and on which the patient’s fantasy is articulated and traversed. the analyst’s position of misunderstanding, of playing the dummy hand – as with the gap made by the work of art – defl ects the patient’s request for interpretation, allowing space for a strange nonrelational form of knowledge at the limits of representational systems. this book’s critical potential lies in its advocacy of a form of knowledge “that is no longer relational, that essentially disrupts the relational quality of any discursive structure” (5). the unconscious occurs in the discontinuities of speech, thought and action, and interrupts communication between self and others. the non-relational stupidity of the unconscious may seem regressive when compared with the emphasis on the intersubjective in certain social constructivist theories and relational aesthetics. a psychoanalytic epistemology is concerned with what interstices 07 continually prevents the full realisation, or closure, of relationality, and instead takes into account the resistances to meaning where the search for knowledge about self and other fails. knowing nothing staying stupid concludes by addressing the question of what use lacanian psychoanalysis is, if it does not improve interpretive methodologies. rather than providing a hermeneutical model, a psychoanalytic epistemology offers another paradigm where, like duchamp’s intervention, an apparently negative or spurious act, which seems to invent problems where none exist, or which fails to respect the wish for knowledge to ‘move on’ in search of the latest epistemological trends, is precisely what is needed in order to link knowledge to its effects (197). in the context of a local and global focus on the society of knowledge, in which research is increasingly measured by its market value, the consequences of knowledge become less creative and more constrained.2 an alternative approach to an ethics of knowledge allows for the passion of ignorance, the moment when the failure of knowledge has creative and critical effects. references dyess, c. and dean, t. (2000). gender: the impossibility of meaning. psychoanalytic dialogues, 10, 735-756. harvey, s. (2003). for knowledge society read knowledge economy? one future for tertiary education in new zealand. retrieved 26 june, 2005, from http://surveys.canterbury. ac.nz/herdsa03/pdfsref/y1076.pdf žižek, s. (2001). the fright of real tears: krzysztof kieślowski between theory and post-theory. london: british film institute. 2 sharon harvey’s criticism of the new zealand knowledge society makes a similar argument when she points out that academics tend to decry the processes of the knowledge economy, but are less concerned with the “destination” of knowledge that advances the globally competitive market place (2003: 5). 202 winged entranceway to the architectural exhibitionm. scolari. (photo. chris adams.) l'ingresso alle corderie dell'arsenale massimo scolari (translated by helene furjan) we could explain this sculpture as an expression of that freedom which flying caused in each one of us, as a record of paper wings between school benches, or of enchantment before the giddy evolution of swallows and the majestic gliding of birds of prey. and perhaps we will only succeed in veiling the evidence reminding us of the aeroplanes that streak the sky every day, depicting modernity with the white trails mingled with the breath of the clouds, or the too luminous points of the satellites that deform the ancient perspective of the starry vault. in reality this object has for years flown over my landscapes, slowly crossing their representations. in the porta per citta di mare (biennale, venice, 1980), it hovered among unravelled clouds above an architecture that protected a peaceful cove. after eleven years of motionless acrobatics that glider settled here, at the limit of architectural construction, already freed from the lament for a heroic utility. nothing else has attracted me like the flight in a way as silent and enigmatic, and perhaps has imprisoned that primordial aspiration to the lightness that our freedom has not been able to concede to us. we are able to fall from the sky, but not to rise, we can float or dive, but we cannot hover in the air like the 203 l'ingresso alle corderie most modest of winged creatures. the flights of icarus or simon mago punctuate the history of this inhuman aspiration, they skirt technical impossibilities until they verge on the laughter of the gods. but we are nevertheless able to fly above our corporeality with fantasy . others have invented machines to glide on gravity and wear wings, as had otto lilienthal for the first time, a hundred years ago, gliding from the 13erlin hills of derwitz. this sculpture only wants to understand all those impossible shattered constructions; it doesn't want to represent but to record them, evaporated from every anthropomorphism and deprived of noisy rotations. two identical architectonic elements stolen from the oblique architecture of the arca (triennale, milano 1986) have here been reunited without changing their individual meaning. from their meeting has sprung this archaic glider set down in front of the navy yards of la serenissima, in this labyrinthine place for excellence from whose belly swarmed the might of venice, "cite humide, sexe femelle de l'europe" (apollonaire) . in a great exhibition of architecture this useless sculpture, not functional, not even to itself, finds in the pride of its futility the region of its existence. and in its exhibited exterior scale this sculpture immediately shows a rupture between what it is and what it would like to be in this place. two ideas interpenetrate and incorporate each other without choice except uncertainty. one belongs to the weight of the wall, to the construction of the architecture; the other, born from the simple symmetrical doubling of the first, returns to the aerial lightness, to the flight. the absence of a compact connection between the two wings was built from the compositional principal of the renunciation, first of all of the renunciation of every peripheral solution: only in the truth of this limitation do the effects not exceed the causes. the image of the glider rested silently among rendered walls appears like an intact catastrophe that redeems the accident beyond common sense. i could have wanted to imprint on it an impalpable smile and to restrain the cutting enigma of the artifice. but if none of all this 204 massimo scolari will manage to unite with the real, i would like at least to leave desire suspended on the beautiful verse of melville: "not vastness, not profusion, /but form-place; /not obstinate invention, /but respect for the archetype." 205 a 1hrcc-