INTERSTICES 12Oculus from below. Photo: author, 2011



147

1 “Ich stelle mir den Himmel vor wie eine 
Bibliothek” (in Renner 2004).

Law Faculty Library at the  
University of Zürich by Santiago Calatrava

Ross Jenner

Can there be an inside without an outside? Caves, underground constructions and 
interiors inserted into other buildings seem to be examples of such. Then there are 
more speculative configurations: monads, for example, or the library conceived by 
Jorge Luis Borges where the notion of Nicholas of Cusa lurks (as it does in Sloter-
dijk’s Sphären) of a Being whose periphery is infinite and whose centre is every-
where, which is to say, where there is nothing outside of ‘it’. As Borges writes,

The universe (which others call the Library) is composed of an indefinite 
and perhaps infinite number of hexagonal galleries, with vast air shafts 
between, surrounded by very low railings. From any of the hexagons one 
can see, interminably, the upper and lower floors. (Borges 1972: 51)

The Law library by Santiago Calatrava at the University of Zürich is a notable ex-
ample of an embedded and (for the most part) hidden insertion of a public interior 
space. It is difficult to understand why the building has not received greater atten-
tion. Perhaps, probably, this neglect is due less to a Calatrava-overload than to the 
absence of an exterior, that is, of a conspicuous thing, object or ‘icon’. This library, 
moreover, owes something to Borges. Calatrava, rephrasing Borges at the build-
ing’s opening as “I imagine Heaven like a library”,1 we may speculate, had his idea 
in mind when designing it. 

Of the siting, Calatrava deemed it “wonderful to build in the university quarter of 
Zürich, in this context rich in the tradition of Karl Moser and Gottfried Semper. 
I have attempted to make something contemporary which corresponds with this 
historical fabric.” The intervention ties in “with the tradition of inner courtyards 
in the University and ETH” (Calatrava & Buchmann 2004). When asked if it was 

Views from ground floor.  
Photos: author, 2011



INTERSTICES 12

a pity that such a precious work was hidden humbly in a courtyard, scarcely vis-
ible from outside, he replied: “When you say ‘humbly’, you’re quite right. This li-
brary originated under delicate circumstances, since Herrmann Fietz’s building 
is under conservation protection. I tackled the project with great respect for the 
existing structure.” Fietz’s original L-shaped building dates from 1908 and was de-
signed as a chemistry laboratory. Twenty years later, it was complemented with 
a further addition (lower by two stories), creating a central courtyard. Such con-
straints led Calatrava to think along Semper’s lines: “I believe I have made a virtue 
of necessity.” (Calatrava & Buchmann 2004) The solution was to leave the existing 
building untouched (apart from integrating the disjointed rooflines), building the 
new library “as a completely independent structure, suspended within the inner 
courtyard and supported against its walls at just four points” (Calatrava 2004), so 
that the distinction between old and new is unmistakable.2 The separation works 
both statically and organisationally: since a library can have only one entrance 
and exit, the professors alone have keys to the connecting doors on each level. The 
galleries are supported from the two lateral concrete cores and by steel columns on 
the side, partially integrated with book stacks. A lift (à la John Portman), staircase 
and access to the building services are located at each end of the galleries.

On entry,3 the gaze is drawn upwards, automatically, inevitably, to the building’s 
most striking accent, technically and artistically: the lenticular, glazed cupola 
with hydraulically activated lamella sun-shading. Below it, as if freely suspended 
in air, hover six elliptical galleries.

Typical of Calatrava, the upper structure draws on natural analogies: the main 
girder resembles a spine and the individual cantilevered beams are welded to its 
ribs. This oculus would seem also to bring together primordial metaphors of bodi-
ly apertures, including the ungendered: the eye and eyelid. Calatrava’s aperture 
has an element of intelligent design: it opens and closes to admit or reflect light, 
letting the building regulate its own climate. A good amount of natural light is 
provided during the day, with or without shutters, reducing the need for artificial 

2 The illuminated interstices between 
the lenticular ‘exterior’ of the library and the 
orthogonal interior of the former courtyard 
lead to unpredictable encounters.

3 The new entry to the building is down-
played, as if arrival and departure were 
irrelevant by comparison with the serene 
immanence of the interior. In fact, the entry is 
somewhat counter-intuitive: either the patron 
walks around the building to the street behind, 
in order to descend to reception, or winds 
from the original main entrance through a 
series of dark and compressed passages to it. 

Top: Interstice between library and pre-
existing courtyard. Photo: author, 2011

Right: Top level gallery work stations. 
Photo: author, 2011



149

light and thus lending the space a greater vividness. The passing of the day and 
the varying light and weather conditions follow almost tangibly.

A thermal stack principle is employed in ventilation: air at four to six degrees 
warmer than outside concentrates at the cupola and passes out by vents, drawing 
up fresh air sucked in at the bottom of the building. Fresh air entering the build-
ing is modified passively by a heat exchange system connected to ground sensors, 
43 of which are installed at a depth of 100 metres to heat or cool the water to about 
18°. This then passes through a heat exchanger, which in turn cools or heats air 
taken from outside. The fresh air is either fed directly into the library or used for 
the cooling ceilings built into the attic story, maintaining the temperature of a 
Dantean Paradiso.4 

Expanding upwards in a funnel to the cupola, the galleries accommodate indi-
vidual reading stations orientated inwards, around the rim of the timber parapets 
facing the atrium. On all levels up to 500 readers may be seated around it; those 
on either side, however, are shielded from view while only a few on the opposite 
side of the building’s empty core are visible. Herein, as well as the spiral, stands a 
key difference from what might be presumed a precedent, Wright’s Guggenheim, 
where a restless procession of circulating spectators is put on display around the 
central atrium. By contrast, also, in the vastness of Asplund’s Stockholm Public Li-
brary, attention is drawn to the peripheral enclosure, the cylinder of books.

4 For further technical information, see Strehler 
and Niederer (2006).

Section and plans (left: level 0; right: level 6) 
by Calatrava office. Courtesy Corbin-Hillman 
Communications, NY



INTERSTICES 12

The book, in the intense silence of reading, is another interior without an exterior. 
In a university, however, this interiority is part of a larger configuration: the soli-
tary reader is immersed in a collective:

Reading is a linear experience, and an individual one. A library, espe-
cially one built for a university, must therefore be a place where the col-
lective experience can give way to solitary reflection. Students and fac-
ulty should be able to feel they are part of a shared scholarly enterprise, 
and small gathering places – parlatoria – should be available for discus-
sions. But the library as a whole must be a quiet place, which encourages 
intimacy between the reader and the book. (Calatrava 2004)

The study areas are closed off at the rear by bookshelves, behind which is another 
light well bringing daylight into the old part of the building. The book stacks are 
pushed against the outer perimeter, establishing a simple grid that makes locat-
ing books easy while contributing (together with the acoustic baffles formed by the 
timber slats with their substrate) to the reading areas’ quietness.

Top: Gallery workstations. Photo: 
Thomas Stein, 2007. Flickr

Bottom left: Top level gallery.  
Photo: author, 2011

Bottom right: Gallery soffits. Photo: 
Renato Silver, 2007. Flickr

Views at top level. Photos: author, 2011



151

The hovering (levitating, even) character of the interior derives not only from the 
self-supporting statical configuration of the galleries, but also from the daylight 
flooding in, reflecting off the white stone of the ground floor, the white-painted 
steel and the light maple surfaces (Canadian maple for the floors, European for the 
balustrades and soffits). These finishes combine to produce a warm glow of reflect-
ed light between the platforms. The very vacancy of the bottom kindles the desire 
to ascend.

Calatrava mentions – and seems to enjoy – the paradox that books are heavy but 
knowledge immaterial, that is (presumably), weightless. He elaborates:

The library floats in the courtyard as if it were an enormous piece of fur-
niture. The library as furniture – this idea was already there in the Re-
naissance and Baroque. Think of the Medicean Laurenzana in Florence 
or the Stiftsbibliothek in St. Gallen. (Calatrava & Buchmann 2004)

No, Calatrava’s library is not the Library of which Borges writes (even an inatten-
tive reader will have noticed from the start): the air shafts are not vast, nor the 
railings very low at all. The geometry is baroque but the galleries are elliptical, 
not hexagonal. The floors, above all, are not interminable. But Borges’ library, of 
course, is un-buildable (or already built – infinitely). His is devoted to utter, anony-
mous, expressionless, silence.5 Calatrava has built a cosmological image here, am-
ply, with ease, and with greater anonymity and silence than he has ever achieved 
before, and maybe since.

References

Artìs, C. M. (2002). Borges nel suo labririnto. In Silenzi eloquenti. Borges, Mies van der Rohe, Ozu, 

Rothko, Oteiza (pp. 17 – 27; S. Pierini, Trans.). Milan: Christian Marinotti Edizioni.

Borges, J. L. (1972). The Library of Babel. In Donald A. Yates and James E. Irby (Eds.), Labyrinths; 
selected stories and other writings [translated from the Spanish]. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Calatrava, S. (2004). Architect’s Statement (unpublished manuscript). Courtesy of Corbin-
Hillman Communications, New York.

Calatrava, S. & Buchmann, S. (2004). “Wissen ist schwerelos – das wollte ich sichtbar machen”. 
Interview with Calatrava. UZH News, 21.11. 04. Retrieved September 5, 2011, from http://www.uzh.
ch/news/articles/2004/1363.html

Renner, S. (2004). Der Himmel ist eine Bibliothek. Retrieved September 5, 2011, from http://www.
uzh.ch/news/articles/2004/1392.html 

Strehler, R. & Niederer U. (2006). The New Law Library of the University of Zurich, Liber Quarterly, 
Volume 16 Issue 2. Retrieved September 2, 2011, from http://liber.library.uu.nl/ 5  See Artís (2002).

View across interstice to workstations 
at first half-level. Photo: Thomas Stein, 
2007. Flickr