Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 

 Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016) 11- 23 

ISSN: 1997-4884 

 
 
 
 
 

Synthesis Of Nano Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst 

 
Abdul-Halim A. K. Mohamed* and Hawraa H. Atta 

Chemical Engineering Department – College of Engineering – University of Baghdad (Iraq) 

* Email: prof.abdulhaleem@gmail.com  
 

Abstract 

Nano γ-Al2O3 support was prepared by co-precipitation method by using 

different calcination temperatures (550, 600, and 750) 
o
C. Then nano NiMo/γ-Al2O3 

catalyst was prepared by impregnation method were nickel carbonate (source of Ni) 

and ammonium paramolybdate (source of Mo) on the best prepared nano γ-Al2O3 

support at calcination temperature 550 
o
C. Make the characterizations for prepared 

nano γ-Al2O3 support at different temperatures and for nano NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst 

like X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescent, AFM, SEM, BET surface area, and pore 

volume. 

The Ni and Mo percentages in the prepared nano NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst 

determined by X-ray fluorescence were 2.924 wt % and 12.9 wt %, respectively. SEM 

of prepared nano γ-Al2O3 support at calcination temperature 550 
o
C. The average 

particles diameter of prepared γ-Al2O3 support determined by AFM at calcination 

temperatures 550, 600, and 750 
o
C and for prepared nano NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst at 

calcination temperature 550
 o
C.  

 

Key words: Nanoparticles, γ-Al2O3, NiMo/ γ-Al2O3, Co-precipitation method. 

 

Introduction 

Gamma Al2O3 is one of the 

important ceramic materials which are 

mostly used as adsorbent, catalyst, and 

catalyst support because its thermal, 

chemical, and mechanical stability. For 

use as catalyst or adsorbent alumina 

with desirable characteristics such as 

high surface area, and small particle 

size is required [1]. Morphology of 

synthetic gamma alumina can be 

changed by varying some of the 

reaction conditions such as: 

temperature, pressure, reaction time, 

thermal decomposition routes and 

methods of preparation, precursors, 

and reactants. The catalytic properties 

of gamma alumina depend on its 

physical properties such as surface 

acidity, porosity, and pore size of 

particles [2].  

Alumina is a chemical compound 

with melting point of 2072 °C and 

specific gravity of 3.4. Alumina is 

insoluble in water and organic liquids 

and very slightly soluble in strong 

acids and alkalies [3]. Alumina occurs 

in two crystalline forms. Alpha 

alumina is composed of colorless 

spherical crystals shape. While gamma 

alumina is composed of minute 

colorless non spherical or irregular 

hexagonal crystals shape depending on 

the arrangement of oxygen anions [4]. 

University of Baghdad 
College of Engineering 

Iraqi Journal of Chemical and 
Petroleum Engineering 

 

mailto:prof.abdulhaleem@gmail.com


 Synthesis Of Nano Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst 

12                                IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)              -Available online at: www.iasj.net 
 

The gamma phase is transform to the 

alpha form at high temperatures [3]. 

Also when high pressure the 

transformation is used, phase 

transformation occurs at low 

temperature. For example the phase of 

gamma alumina can be transformed to 

alpha alumina by changing 

temperature from750 to 1000 
o
C at 1 

atm. But when increase the pressure 

from 1 atm to 8 GPa, gamma alumina 

transforms phase to alpha alumina at 

460 
o
C because the high pressure 

decrease the thermodynamic energy 

barrier, and kinetic energy barrier 

required for nucleation also causes the 

phase transformation. High pressure 

caused enough number of nucleation 

sites to prevent the formation of the 

vermicular structure and take the 

equiaxed structure. The transition 

phase and temperature depend on the 

particles size chemical homogeneity, 

heating rate, and water vapor pressure 

[4].  

The mechanical properties of 

gamma alumina depend on their 

nanostructure which are related with 

the shape, and size of the alumina 

particles. Alumina has many 

advantages: hard, highly resistance 

towards bases and acid, very high 

temperature application, and excellent 

wear resistance [5]. The phase of alpha 

alumina with microsize is more stable 

than gamma alumina phase, while the 

phase of gamma alumina in nano 

structure is more stable than alpha 

alumina. This is because of the change 

in the thermodynamic stability with the 

size of nano particle [6]. 

Potdar, et al., (2007) prepared 

nano sized γ-Al2O3 by precipitation / 

digestion method at calcination 

temperature 550 
o
C. The surface area 

of obtained nano alumina was 220 

m
2
/g and the average pore diameter 

was 4.5 nm [7]. Y. I. Tian-hong, el at., 

(2009) used precipitation method to 

prepare nano alumina at calcination 

temperature 450 
o
C and pH range 8 to 

9. The surface area of obtained nano 

alumina was 269.9 m
2
/g, the pore 

volume was 0.57 ml/g, with range of 

size from 40 to 50 nm [8]. Parida, et 

al., (2009) prepared nano spherical 

shape γ-Al2O3 by control precipitation 

method at calcination temperature 550 
o
C. The surface area of prepared 

catalyst was 190 m
2
/g and the 

crystallite size was 5.7 nm [9]. 

Mandan, et al., (2010) prepared nano 

sized γ-Al2O3 by sol gel method at 

calcination temperature 600 
o
C. The 

surface area of obtained catalyst, the 

pore volume, and the average pore 

diameter were 242.9 m
2
/g , 1.42 cm

3
/g, 

and 16.5 nm respectively [10]. Sarah, 

et al., (2012) prepared nano sized γ-

Al2O3 by sol-gel method at calcination 

temperature 500 
o
C. The surface area 

of obtained gamma alumina was 197 

m
2
/g, the pore volume was 0.38 cm

3
/g 

and the average pore diameter was 8.6 

nm [11]. Asencios, et al., (2012) 

prepared nano sized γ-Al2O3 by 

precipitation method at calcination 

temperature 500 
o
C. The surface area 

of prepared gamma alumina was 371 

m
2
/g, while the pH was 6, the pore 

volume was 0.275 cm
3
/g, and the 

average pore diameter was 4.5 nm 

[12]. S.Y. Hosseini, et al., (2012) 

prepared nano γ-Al2O3 catalyst powder 

by precipitation/digestion method at 

calcination temperature 580 
o
C for 5 h

-

1
 in air. The obtained gamma alumina 

surface area, average pore diameter 

and total pore volume are 251 m
2
/g, 

8.95 nm and 0.82 cm
3
/g, respectively

 

[13].  

A. Rajaeiyan, et al., (2013) 

prepared nanostructured gamma 

alumina powder by sol gel and co-

precipitation methods at 750 
o
C. The 

surface area of prepared sample by sol 

gel method was 30.72 m
2
/g and pore 

diameter was 49.09 nm, while the 

surface area of the prepared sample by 

precipitation method, and the pore 

http://www.iasj.net/


Abdul-Halim A. K. Mohamed and Hawraa H. Atta 

 

-Available online at: www.iasj.net                    IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)                      13 
 

diameter were 206.2  m
2
/g, and 7.31 

nm, respectively [14]. M. Edrissi, et 

al., (2013) prepared nano sized 

alumina by combustion synthesis. The 

surface area of prepared nano alumina 

and average pore diameter were 

154m
2
/g, and 10 nm respectively 

(15)
. 

Ferechteh rashidi, et al., (2013) 

prepared nano γ-Al2O3 support by sol-

gel method. The obtained nano γ-

Al2O3 with surface area 404.05 m
2
/g , 

pore volume 1.06 cm
3
/g and average 

size 10.469 nm. HDS catalyst was 

prepared by wet co-impregnation 

method with percentage of 3% Co, 13 

% Ni, and 3 % P on prepared γ-Al2O3. 

The surface area of obtained catalyst 

was 295.63 m
2
/g, the pore volume was 

0.62 cm
3
/g, and the average pore 

diameter was 8.355 nm. This catalyst 

used for HDS diesel fuel which 

decreased the sulfur content from 150 

ppm to 38 ppm [16]. A. Eliassi, et al., 

(2014) prepared nanosized γ-Al2O3 

with surface area 413 m
2
/g, average 

pore diameter 38 nm and pore volume 

1.624 cm
3
/g by using 

precipitation/digestion method. This 

catalyst used for methanol dehydration 

to dimethyl ether using fixed bed 

microreactor. The operation conditions 

were LHSV from 20 to 50 h
-1

 and 

temperature from 250 to 300 
o
C [17].  

The aim of this work is to 

prepare nano gamma alumina then use 

it in the preparation of nano Ni-Mo/γ-

Al2O3 catalyst which can be used for 

hydrodesulphurization of Iraqi gas oil. 

 

Experimental 

 

Synthesis of Alumina by Co-

Precipitation Method 

1 M of AlCl3 was dissolved in 

300 ml ethanol and 90 ml distilled 

water was added to get a transparent 

solution, then 120 ml NH3 was added 

to the stirred AlCl3.6H2O solution drop 

by drop with the rate of 2.5 ml/min 

until the precipitate became white as 

Al
3+

 gel hydroxides was formed. After 

gel filtering in vacuum system, it was 

dried at 80 °C over night in the oven, 

and calcinated at 550 °C, 600 °C for 2 

h, and 750 °C for 1 h. A white fine 

alumina nano-powder was obtained.  

 

Synthesis of Nano Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 
Catalyst 

The Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst was 

prepared by impregnation method. The 

device used for impregnation consisted 

of a conical flask  with a separating 

funnel, vacuum pump, electric shaker 

and trap to absorb the moisture and 

gases (Figure 1). An impregnated 

aqueous solution was prepared by 

dissolving 2.7 g nickel carbonate, 4.2 g 

of ammonium para molybdate and 25 

ml of distilled water with mixing at 

room temperature. This solution was 

poured in the conical flask of the 

impregnation apparatus which contains 

15 g of dried nano gamma alumina. 

The impregnation took place drop by 

drop for 1.5 hours. The impregnated 

nano alumina was air dried at 80 °C for 

16 hours and then calcined at 550 °C 

for 16 hours. 

 

 
Fig. 1: The device used for impregnation 

 

Results and Discussion 

 

XRD Analysis and XRF Analysis 

X-Ray Diffraction analysis for 

the samples was carried out using 

Rigaku X-Ray Diffractometer with 

CuKα radiation under identical 

conditions. These conditions are: 

http://www.iasj.net/


 Synthesis Of Nano Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst 

14                                IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)              -Available online at: www.iasj.net 
 

wavelength (λ) = 1.5406 A
0
, tube 

voltage = 40 kV, tube current = 30 

mA, and scan range: 10 – 70 (deg).         

The XRD spectrum gives the 

diffraction intensity verses 2θ plot. The 

XRD spectra of prepared nano alumina 

at different temperatures are shown in 

the Figures 2 - 4, while the XRD 

spectrum standard of gamma alumina 

is shown in Figure 5. The comparison 

of XRD spectra with standard 

spectrum shows that all peaks of 

prepared support approached the 

standard gamma alumina. This means 

that the prepared support at different 

temperatures is gamma alumina. The 

difference in the height of obtained 

peaks may be due to the change in the 

calcination temperature used during 

support preparation. This mean the 

prepared support is nano gamma 

alumina because of that the peaks is 

more wide than the standard peas.   

 

 
Fig. 2: The XRD spectrum for prepared nano gamma alumina at calcination temperature 550 

o
C 

 

 
Fig. 3: The XRD spectrum for prepared nano gamma alumina at calcination temperature 600 

o
C 

 

 
Fig. 4: The XRD spectrum for prepared nano gamma alumina at calcination temperature 750 

o
C 

 

 

 

http://www.iasj.net/


Abdul-Halim A. K. Mohamed and Hawraa H. Atta 

 

-Available online at: www.iasj.net                    IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)                      15 
 

 
Fig. 5: The XRD spectrum of synthetic of standard gamma alumina 

 

The purity of solid crystal was 

measured by comparing the X-ray 

diffractogram pattern of prepared nano 

alumina at different calcination 

temperatures with X-ray diffractogram 

pattern of standard gamma alumina 

shown in Table 1. This comparison 

proved that the prepared gamma 

alumina at calcination temperature 550 
o
C is more nearly to the standard.  

The XRF analysis was used to 

find the percentage of Ni and Mo in 

the prepared catalyst. The percentages 

of Ni and Mo were 2.924 wt % and 

12.920 wt %, respectively. The 

concentration of the metals on the 

support usually varies from 8 to 25 % 

for the active metal (Mo) and from 1 to 

4 % for the promoter (Ni or Co) [20]. 

The percentage of Ni and Mo in 

prepared nano catalysts are not far 

from those obtained by Sandeep 

Badoga,el at., (2014), who prepared 

mesoporous NiMo/γ-Al2O3 by using 

the sequential impregnation (3% Ni, 

13% Mo). 

 
Table 1: Comparison between prepared nano gamma alumina at different calcination temperatures and 

standard synthetic gamma alumina 

Gamma alumina 

550 
o
C 

Gamma alumina 

600 
o
C 

Gamma alumina 

750 
o
C 

Standard gamma 

alumina 

Angle 

(2ɵ) deg 

d,spacing 

(Å) 

Angle 

(2ɵ) deg 

d,spacing 

(Å) 

Angle 

(2ɵ) deg 

d,spacing 

(Å) 

Angle 

(2ɵ) deg 

d,spacing 

(Å) 

20.462 4.33 20.000 4.43 21.246 4.18 20.494 4.33 

31.641 2.82 31.691 2.82 31.728 2.81 31.936 2.80 

37.486 2.39 37.385 2.40 37.323 2.40 37.603 2.39 

39.521 2.28 39.434 2.28 39.492 2.27 39.401 2.28 

45.930 1.97 45.930 1.97 45.905 1.98 45.764 1.98 

60.349 1.53 60.224 1.53 59.974 1.54 60.457 1.53 

66.422 1.40 66.827 1.39 66.688 1.40 66.761 1.40 

 

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) 

The morphology of prepared 

alumina was studied using Atomic 

Force Microscope. Figures 6 – 8 show 

the images of AFM on two-

dimensional surface profile at different 

calcination temperatures, while Figures 

9 - 11 show AFM images for three-

dimensional surface profile at different 

calcination temperature. The two 

dimensional surface images in Figures 

6 - 8 show the irregular hexagonal 

structure of the gamma alumina 

crystal. Three dimensional surface 

http://www.iasj.net/


 Synthesis Of Nano Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst 

16                                IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)              -Available online at: www.iasj.net 
 

images shown in Figures 9 - 11 

indicate that the agglomerates of 

gamma alumina nano crystal are in 

form of irregular hexagonal layers with 

height terraces up to 9.8 nm [5]. 
 

Fig. 6: AFM on two-dimensional surface of 

prepared nano alumina at calcination temp. 

550
 o
C 

 

 
Fig. 7: AFM on two-dimensional surface of 

prepared nano alumina at calcination temp. 

600
 o
C 

 

 
Fig. 8: AFM on two-dimensional surface of 

prepared nano alumina at calcination temp. 

750
o
C 

 
Fig. 9: AFM for three-dimensional surface of 

prepared nano alumina at calcination temp. 

550
 o
C 

 

 
Fig. 10: AFM for three-dimensional surface of 

prepared nano alumina at calcination temp. 

600
 o
C 

 

 
Fig. 11: AFM for three-dimensional surface of 

prepared nano alumina at calcination temp. 

750
o
C 

 

Figures 12 – 14 show the particle 

size distribution for prepared gamma 

alumina at different calcination 

temperatures. At calcination 

temperature 550
 o

C the results confirm 

the largest volume percentage 19.27 % 

at 50 nm and the lowest volume 

percentage 0.36 % at 90 - 95 nm. The 

prepared gamma alumina at 550 
o
C 

consisted of particles with diameters 

ranged between 45 - 95 nm and 

average diameter of 56.91 nm this 

http://www.iasj.net/


Abdul-Halim A. K. Mohamed and Hawraa H. Atta 

 

-Available online at: www.iasj.net                    IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)                      17 
 

result is near from that of A. 

Rajaeiyan, et al., (2013), who prepared 

nano structured gamma alumina 

powder 49.09 nm [5]. While at 600 
o
C 

the results confirm the largest volume 

percentage 7.11 % at 55 nm and the 

lowest volume percentage 0.22 % at 99 

- 100 nm. The prepared gamma 

alumina at 600 
o
C consisted of 

particles with diameters ranged 

between 15 - 180 nm and average 

diameter of 68.72 nm. At 750 
o
C the 

results confirm the most volume 

percentage 11.18 % at 105 nm and the 

lowest volume percentage 0.62 % at 45 

nm. The prepared gamma alumina at 

750
 o

C consisted of particles with 

diameters ranged between 45 - 105 nm 

and average diameter of 77.27 nm. 

 

 
Fig. 12: Bar chart of particle size distribution for prepared alumina at calcination temperature 550 

o
C   

 

      
Fig. 13: Bar chart of particle size distribution for prepared alumina at calcination temperature 600 

o
C 

 

 
Fig. 14: Bar chart of particle size distribution for prepared alumina at calcination temperature 750 

o
C 

http://www.iasj.net/


 Synthesis Of Nano Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst 

18                                IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)              -Available online at: www.iasj.net 
 

Usually the range of nano 

particles is 1 – 100 nano meter [21]. 

Figures 12 – 14 show that all prepared 

alumina support at different calcination 

temperature are nano type. It was 

observed that the average particle 

diameter of nano gamma alumina 

increase with the increase in 

calcination temperature. This is due to 

the crystal sentering [22]. 

The AFM images of prepared 

NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst using nano 

alumina support obtained at calcination 

temperature 550 
o
C are shown in 

Figures 15 - 16. The two dimensional 

surface images in Figure 15 show the 

irregular hexagonal structure of the 

gamma alumina crystal. Three 

dimensional surface images shown in 

Figure 16 indicating that the 

agglomerate of gamma alumina nano 

crystal are in form of irregular 

hexagonal layers with height terraces 

up to 3.96 nm [5]. 

Figure 17 show the particle size 

distribution for prepared gamma 

alumina and these results confirm the 

largest volume percentage 23.85 % of 

particle size distribution 70 nm and the 

lowest volume percentage 5.38%, 85 

nm. It also show the prepared gamma 

alumina consisted of particles with 

diameters ranged between 55 - 85 nm 

and average diameter was 64.74 nm. 

This means that the particle of 

prepared nano NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst 

was nano type. The increasee in 

average particle diameter of prepared 

catalyst occurs due to loading Ni and 

Co during impregnation on prepared 

support and crystal centering during 

impregnation method [22]. 

 

 
Fig. 15: For prepared NiMo/γ-Al2O3 AFM 

image on two-dimensional surface profile at 

550
 o
C 

 

 
Fig. 16: For prepared NiMo/γ-Al2O3 AFM for 

three-dimensional surface profile at 550 
o
C 

  

 
Fig. 17: Bar chart of particle size distribution for prepared nano NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst at calcination 

temperature 550
 o
C 

http://www.iasj.net/


Abdul-Halim A. K. Mohamed and Hawraa H. Atta 

 

-Available online at: www.iasj.net                    IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)                      19 
 

Scanning Electron Microscopy 

(SEM) 

SEM images of prepared gamma 

alumina at calcination temperature 550 
o
C are shown in Figure 18, at 

magnification of 50.00, 20.00, 47.90, 

10.00, 4.00, and 3.00 k x. It is very 

convenient to compare the prepared 

gamma alumina crystal with that 

prepared by A. Rajaeiyan, et al., 

(2013), as shown in Figure 19. 

 

    
     a.SEM at a magnification of 4.00 kx                           b.SEM at a magnification of 20.00 kx  

   
c.SEM at a magnification of 50.00 kx                d.SEM at a magnification of 10.00 kx 

   
e.SEM at a magnification of 606 x                     f.SEM at a magnification of 3.00 kx 

 

Fig. 18: SEM images of prepared nano gamma alumina 

 

The comparison of SEM images for 

prepared gamma alumina with SEM 

for prepared nano gamma alumina by 

A. Rajaeiyan, et al., (2013) shows that 

both gamma alumina are irregular 

hexagonal shape particles with uniform 

http://www.iasj.net/


 Synthesis Of Nano Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst 

20                                IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)              -Available online at: www.iasj.net 
 

distribution and has not strong 

agglomeration [5]. 

 

 
a.SEM at a magnification of 47.90 kx of 

prepared gamma alumina 
 

 
b.SEM at a magnification of 15.00 kx of 

prepared gamma alumina by A. Rajaeiyan, 
 

Fig. 19: SEM images of prepared gamma 

alumina and nano gamma alumina prepared by 

A. Rajaeiyan, et al., [5] 
 

General Properties of Catalyst 

Physical and chemical properties 

of prepared catalyst at different 

calcinations temperature such as 

surface area, and pore volume were 

determined by BET device and 

presented in Table 2. 

This table shows that the surface 

area decreased with increasing 

calcination temperature and maximum 

surface area 256.0 m
2
/g is obtained at 

calcination temperature 550 
o
C while 

the surface area of prepared nano 

gamma alumina by A. Rajaeiyan, 

etal.,(2013) was 206.2 m
2
/g. The 

higher surface area usually has a high 

percentage of small pores [5]. Also the 

using of high calcination temperature 

causes quick water evaporation from 

small pore to the large pore then to the 

bulk and this gives pressure drop. This 

pressure drop collapses part of pores 

especially in hydrogel step resulting in 

partial loss of surface area [9]. 

The pore volume of γ-Al2O3 

decreases with the increase in 

calcination temperature increasing and 

the minimum pore volume 0.3742 

cm
3
/g obtained at calcination 

temperature 550 
o
C which was not far 

from 0.467 cm
3
/g obtained by Parida et 

al. (2009) [1]. This occurs because 

high calcination temperature increases 

the reaction temperature, which rapidly 

leads the crystallites to contact each 

other. The contact occurs by two 

smaller crystallites agitated at higher 

temperatures resulting in coalescing to 

a larger one causing an increase of the 

pore volume and decrease the surface 

area by sintering or agglomeration of 

crystallites [9].    

 
Table 5: Physical properties of prepared nano  support γ-Al2O3 

Calcined Temp
 o
C 

Surface Area 

m
2
/g 

Pore Volume 

cm
3
/g 

Pore volume distribution 

nm 

550 256.0 0.3742 5 

600 217.5 0.3715 - 

750 213.5 0.4123 - 

 

The prepared nano Ni-Mo/ɣ-

Al2O3 catalyst obtained at calcination 

temperature 550 
o
C has surface area 

215.82 m
2
/g, and pore volume 0.2855 

cm
3
/g which was near that by Sandeep 

Badoga,el at., (2014) who prepared 

nano Ni-Mo/ɣ-Al2O3 catalyst with 

surface area of 225 m
2
/g . The decrease 

http://www.iasj.net/


Abdul-Halim A. K. Mohamed and Hawraa H. Atta 

 

-Available online at: www.iasj.net                    IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)                      21 
 

in surface area, and pore volume may 

be due to blockage of some pores by 

impregnation of Ni and Mo on the 

prepared support [21]. 

 

Conclusion 

Nano γ-Al2O3 support was 

prepared by co-precipitation method 

from aluminum chloride as a source of 

alumina and ammonia hydroxide by 

using different calcination 

temperatures 550, 600, and 750 
o
C. 

From X-ray diffraction pattern and 

when compared it with the standard of 

gamma alumina found that prepared 

supports at different temperatures are 

mainly gamma alumina. 

BET test found the surface area 

of prepared nano gamma alumina at 

550, 600, and 750
 o

C are 256, 217, 213 

m
2
/g. The decreasing in surface area 

occur by increasing temperature. 

From Atomic Force Microscopy 

test found that the average diameter of 

particles of prepared gamma alumina is 

56.91 nm at 550 
o
C, 68.72 nm at 600

 

o
C and 77.27 nm at 750

 o
C. While the 

average diameter of particles of 

prepared NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst is 

64.74 nm, and this means that the 

prepared γ-Al2O3 support and the 

prepared NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst are in 

the range of nano type 1-100 nm. 

 

References 

1. Mohamed Reza N. "Empirical 
Modeling of Nano Alumina 

Combustion Synthesis Using Box-

Behnken Statistical Desiden", 

15875-4413, 2013. 

2. A. Eliassi, M. Ranjbar, "Application 
of Novel Gamma alumina 

Nanostructure for Preparation of 

Dimethyl Ether From Methanol", 

Vd.10, No.1, PP.13-26., Mar, 2014. 

3. Carvill, B. T. and L. T. Thompson, 
"Hydrodesulfurazation Over Model 

Sulfide Cluster-Derived Catalysts", 

Applied Catalysis. 75, 249-265, 

1991. 

4. Lioa, S. C., Chen, Y. J., Kear, B. H., 
and Mayo, W. E., "High Pressure 

Low Temperature Sintering of Nano 

Crystalline Alumina Nano 

Structured Materials", 10 (60). 

1998. 

5. A. Rajaeiyan, M. M. Bagheri-
Mohaghi, "Comparison of Sol- gel 

and Co-precipitation Methods on 

The Structural Properties and Phase 

Transformation of γ and α-Al2O3  
Nanoparticales", Springer, 1: 176-

182, 11. May, 2013. 

6. Philippe Serp. and Karine 
Philippot., "Nano Materials in 

Catalysis", First Edition, 2013. 

7. Potdar H. S., Jun K. W., Kim S.M., 
Lee Y. J., "Synthesis of Nanosized 

Porous γ-Al2O3 Powder Via A 

Precipitation Didstion Roate", App 

Catal, A 321:109-116. 

8. Y. I. Jian – Hong, Sun You- Yi., X. 
V. Chun-Yan, "Synthesis of 

Crystalline γ-Al2O3 With High 

Purity", Elsevier, Jan., 2009. 

9. James T. Richardson, "Principles of 
Catalyst Development", Peg 29-

143. 

10. Mandan Akai, Seyed Mahdi 
Alavi, and Zi-Feng Yan. "Promoted 

Platinum Dehydrogenation Catalyst 

on A Nano-sized Gamma Alumina 

Support", Petroleum & coal, 15, 

Oct., 2010. 

11. Sarah Hartmann, Alexander 
Sachse, and Anne Galarneau, 

"Challenges and Strategies in the 

Synthesis of Mesoporous Alumina 

Powders and Hierarchical Alumina 

Monoliths", Materials, 20 Feb., 

2012. 

12. Yvan J. O. Asencios, and Maria 
R. Sun-Kou, "Synthesis of High-

Surface Area γ-Al2O3 from 

Aluminum Scrap and Its Use for the 

Adsorption of Metals: Pd (II), Cd 

(II), and Zn (II)", SiBi, 26, June., 

2012. 

13. S. Y. Hosseini, and M. R. 
Khosravi Nikon, "Synthesis and 

http://www.iasj.net/


 Synthesis Of Nano Ni-Mo/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst 

22                                IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)              -Available online at: www.iasj.net 
 

Characterization of Nano-sized γ-

Al2O3 Catalyst for Production of 

Dimethyl Ether Via Indirect 

Method", ICNS4, 14, March, 2012. 

14. I. S. Seyed Ali Hosseini, Aligholi 
Niaei, and Dariush Salari, 

"Production of   γ-Al2O3 from 

Kaolin", Scientific Research, 12, 

July, 2011. 

15. Mohamed Edrissi, and Reza 
Norouzbeigi, "Empirical Modeling 

of Nano Alumina Combustion 

Synthesis Using Box-Behnken 

Statistical Design", 

www.tandfonline.con/lio/lsrt20, 02, 

Des., 2013. 

16. Fereshteh Rashidi, Takehiko Ali 
Morad Rashidi, Ali Nemati Kharat, 

and Kheirollah Jafari Jozani, "Ultra 

Deep Hydrodesulfurization of 

Diesel Fuels Using Highly Efficient 

Nano Alumina-supported Catalyst: 

Impact of Support, Phosphours, 

and/or Boron on the Structure and 

Catalytic Activity", Elsevier, 4 Feb., 

2013. 

17. Sandeep Badoga, Rajesh V. 
Sharma, Ajay K. Dalai, and John 

Adjaye, " Hydrotreating of Heavy 

Gas Oil on Mesoporous Mixed 

Metal Oxides (M-Al2O3, M=TiO2, 

ZrO2, SnO2) Supported NiMo 

Catalyst: Influence of Surface 

Acidity", Int. J. Nanosci. 

Nanotechnol, No1, Vol. 10, 12 

May, 2014.  

18. Jinto Manjaly Anthony Kutty, 
"Hydrotreating of Tall Oils on a 

Sulfied NiMo Catalyst for the 

Production of Base – Chemicals In 

Steam Crackers", 24 
th

 of April, 

2015. 

19. Syed Tajammal Hussain, and 
Farzana Zia, "Modified Nano 

Supported Catalyst for Selective 

Catalytic Hydrogenation of Edible 

Oils", Springer, 18 Des., 2008. 

20. Luisa Filipponi, and Duncon 
Suther Land, " Nano Technologies 

Principles, Application, Implication, 

and Hand-on Activities", pag 19, 

2013. 

21. Ghanbari K., "Petroleum and 
Coal", Elsevier, 28(2)33-36, 2006. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.iasj.net/
http://www.tandfonline.con/lio/lsrt20


Abdul-Halim A. K. Mohamed and Hawraa H. Atta 

 

-Available online at: www.iasj.net                    IJCPE Vol.17 No.4 (December 2016)                      23 
 

Appendix (A) 
 

SPECTRO X-LabPro                                                                              Job Number: 0 

Description             Hawraa              Method                       TurboQuant-Powders 

Sample Name          3                       Date of Receipt            05/27/2015 11:56:06 

Z    Symbol             Element                Norm. Int                Concentration                       Abs. Error 

 

12     Mgo             Magnesium              38.0224                        0.927       %                      0.027      %  

 13    Al2O3          Aluminum           12382.5502                      79.85        %                      0.066       % 

 14    SiO2            Silicon                      66.3879                         0.2311    %                      0.0051     %  

 15    P2O5           Phosphorus           254.9972                         0.3699    %                      0.0039     %  

 16    SO3             Sulfur                        0.0000                       < 0.00050  %                      (0.0)        %  

 17    Cl                 Chlorine                428.9963                          0.06085  %                      0.00036  %  

 19    K2O             Potassium                 6.5734                          0.0374    %                      0.0026    %  

 20    CaO             Calcium                   31.9450                          0.1230    %                      0.0023    % 

 22    TiO2            Titanium                    0.0000                       < 0.00034   %                     (0.0)        %  

 23    V2O5           Vanadium                 0.0000                       < 0.00037   %                     (0.0037)  %  

 24    Cr2O3         Chromium                 0.0000                       < 0.00015   %                     (0.0)        %  

 25    MnO            Manganese               7.2168                          0.00373   %                     0.00034  %  

 26    Fe2O3         Iron                        205.1929                         0.06025   %                     0.00040  % 

 27    CoO            Cobalt                      96.6807                         0.1328      %                     0.0087    % 

 28    NiO             Nickel                 19686.3359                         2.924        %                     0.002      % 

 29   CuO             Copper                    40.2948                          0.00447    %                     0.00022  %  

 30   ZnO              Zinc                    2537.4834                           0.2390     %                     0.0004    %  

 31   Ga                Gallium                    0.0000                         < 0.00005   %                    (0.0)         % 

 32   Ge                Germanium             0.0000                         < 0.00005   %                    (0.0)         %  

 33   As2O3          Arsenic                    0.0000                         < 0.00007   %                    (0.0)         %  

 34   Se                Selenium                 0.0000                         < 0.00005   %                    (0.0)         %  

 35   Br                 Bromine                10.9351                             0.00032   %                    0.00002   %  

 37   Rb2O           Rubidium               56.4448                            0.00108   %                    0.00002   %  

 38   SrO              Strontium             439.2818                            0.00821   %                    0.00004   %  

 39   Y                  Yttrium                     9.5877                            0.00015   %                    0.00003   %  

 40   ZrO2            Zirconium              44.4298                             0.01603   %                    0.00033   %  

 41   Nb2O3         Niobium                45.5775                             0.01384   %                    0.00053   %  

 42   Mo               Molybdenum    40962.1338                          12.92         %                    0.01         %  

 47   Ag                Silver                      1.3400                             0.00183    %                   0.00055   % 

 48   Cd                Cadmium                8.6726                            0.00797    %                   0.0004     %  

 50   SnO2           Tin                         12.2892                            0.01152    %                   0.00041   %  

 51   Sb2O5         Antimony                 9.2371                            0.01027    %                   0.00048   %  

 52   Te                Tellurium               11.0299                            0.00700    %                   0.00030    % 

 53    I                   Iodine                     7.0907                            0.00644    %                   0.00067     % 

 55    Cs               Cesium                   0.0000                         < 0.00040    %                   (0.0)         %  

 56    Ba                Barium                   0.0000                         < 0.00020    %                   (0.0)         % 

 57    La                Lanthanum            3.8772                             0.00188    %                   0.00046    %  

 58    Ce               Cerium                   0.0000                          < 0.00020    %                   (0.0)         % 

 72    Hf                Hafnium               34.4012                             0.00660    %                   0.00019   %  

 73    Ta2O5        Tantalum            141.1496                             0.0344      %                   0.0011     %    

 74    WO3           Tungsten              21.4133                             0.00436    %                   0.00094   %  

 80    Hg               Mercury                  0.0000                         < 0.00010     %                  (0.0)         % 

 81    Tl                Thallium                15.2258                            0.00058     %                   0.00003  %  

 82    PbO            Lead                   735.5520                            0.05019     %                   0.00016  %  

 83    Bi                Bismuth                   0.0000                        < 0.00010     %                   0.00047  %  

 90    Th               Thorium                 21.5463                           0.00100     %                   0.00005  %  

 92    U                 Uranium                18.5451                           0.00047     %                   0.00002  %

 

                           Sum of concentration                       54.88         %  

http://www.iasj.net/