Available online at http://ijcpe.uobaghdad.edu.iq and www.iasj.net 

Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum 
 Engineering  

Vol.23 No.2 (June 2022) 47 – 53 
EISSN: 2618-0707, PISSN: 1997-4884 

 

Corresponding Authors:  Name: Zaid Waadulla Rashad , Email: zaid@coeng.uobaghdad.edu.iq   

IJCPE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. 

Studying and Analyzing Operating Conditions of Hollow Fiber 

Membrane Preparation Process: A Review Paper  

 
Zaid Waadulla Rashad 

 
University of Baghdad/College of Engineering/Chemical Eng. Dept. 

 

Abstract 

 
   Polymeric hollow fiber membrane is produced by a physical process called wet or dry/wet phase inversion; a technique includes 
many steps and depends on different factors (starting from selecting materials, end with post-treatment of hollow fiber membrane 

locally manufactured). This review highlights the most significant factors that affect and control the characterization and structure of 
ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes used in different applications.      
   Three different types of polymers (polysulfone PSF, polyethersulfone PES or polyvinyl chloride PVC) were considered to study 
morphology change and structure of hollow fiber membranes in this review. These hollow fiber membranes were manufactured with 
different process conditions and a reasonable starting point for factors remained constant to study the changing effect of specific 
factors. 

      
Keywords: Hollow fiber membranes, phase inversion, ultrafiltration, polymers 
 

Received on 26/05/2022, Accepted on 19/06/2022, published on 30/06/2022 
 

https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2022.2.7  

 
1- Introduction 
 

   Membrane separation is the most flexible reliable and 

promising technology over the past decades. Membrane 

technology offers high performance among other 

processes Adsorption, Extraction, Distillation, and 

leaching in terms of environment friendly and cost effect 

[1], [2].  

   A membrane is described as a barrier separating two 

phases [3] made of high chemical stability materials. 

Membranes are often linked to their application to choose 
the right process and membrane module [4].  

   From the food industry to desalination (providing 

drinking water for millions around the world), dialysis 

(saving the life of kidney disease patients), automotive 

industry (electroplating bath recovery), and gas 

separation, membrane processes can be applied to a wide 

range of applications [4]. 

   Fig. 1 describes membranes classification according to 

their morphology into dense, porous, and composite.  

   Asymmetric porous membranes invented by Loeb and 

Sourirjan, [5] are the most commercially available 

membranes in the present day. The structure of 
asymmetric membranes is a defect-free skin layer based 

on a porous layer [4]. This structure can be achieved by 

simple principles but is quite tricky with a process called 

phase inversion.  

 

 

 

 

   The process starts with polymer solution 

thermodynamically unstable by one of FOUR methods; 

immersion precipitation, vapor induced phase separation, 

thermally induced phase separation, and dry casting, 

which leads to polymer separation to polymer lean create 

pores and voids and polymer-rich phases the porous 

structure of membrane [4-6]. 

 

 
Fig. 1. Membrane classification according to structure 

morphology [4] 
 

   Hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane was first stated 

in1966, this type of membrane is not suitable for RO or 

NF process which applied high pressure because of poor 

mechanical properties [7], however, it is one of the most 

interesting membranes modules as it has many advantages 

among other modules such as high productivity per unit 

volume [8], self-supporting and easy operation [4].  

http://ijcpe.uobaghdad.edu.iq/
http://www.iasj.net/
mailto:zaid@coeng.uobaghdad.edu.iq
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2022.2.7


Z. W. Rashad / Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 23,2 (2022) 47 - 53 
 
 

48 
 

   The importance of hollow fiber membranes as low-

pressure membranes (LPHF) is their ultrafiltration 

performance, ultrafiltration together with microfiltration 

gives good separation performance for drinking water. 

Recent studies suggest that MF and UF can remove all 
particles and colloids as well as viruses completely when 

used with suitable pre-treatment or post-treatment which 

gives this technology advantage to be the new technology 

generation for drinking water of the 21st century [9]. 

Fabrication of hollow fiber membranes is not an easy 

operation especially when specific structure morphology 

is required [10].  

   This review demonstrates literature from some 

researchers to simplify the process steps and give start 

point for researchers to study the change in hollow fiber 

membranes structure by changing one or two factors of 

the preparation process.  
   However, many researchers reported different and 

conflicting results for the same operating conditions but 

different polymers, in terms of permeation and rejection 

(membranes performance).  

 

 

2- Preparation Main Steps and Factors 
   The purpose of studying membranes technology is to 

improve its performance (flux and rejection) via structure 

control as mentioned before [1]. The structure is usually 

sponge-like or finger-like with a selective skin layer on 
the surface as shown in Fig. 2, sponge-like is the favored 

as finger-like leads to a lack in the mechanical stability of 

hollow fiber membranes [4].    

   Preparation steps are the dope solution, spinning 

process, and post-treatment of hollow fiber membranes, 

these steps are discussed in the next section, and all 

operating conditions remain constant except for the factor 

to be changed and studied. 

 

 
Fig. 2. (A) Finger-like structure, (B) Sponge-like 

structure, (C) Uniform sponge-like structure [11] 
 

2.1. Dope Solution Preparation 

 

   The first step to prepare dope or polymer solution is to 

select a suitable polymer powder and good polymer 

solvent. After materials selection, a magnetic stirrer is 

required to homogenize the polymer solution as shown in 

Fig. 3. 

 

 

 

 
Fig. 3. Polymer Solution Preparation [12] 

 

   Firstly, polymer powder should be dried to remove 

moisture. For PSF polymer drying, 60 °C for at least 12 h 
is required then polymer powder added to NMP solvent of 

22/88 PSF/NMP weight percent and mixed until 

homogenized at room temperature (25-27 °C) [13].    

   PVC polymer is a good inexpensive choice for hollow 

fiber manufacturing[N]. PVC powder was dissolved in di-

methyl acetamide DMAC chemically and thermally stable 

solvent [14] after dried for 24 hr. at 70 °C under 

continuous mixing period (5 days) at room temperature 

(25 °C). PVC/DMAC ratio was 14/88 w/w, [10].  

   Mustaffar et al. [1] chose PES polymer with three 

different concentrations and polyethylene glycol PEG as 
polymer additive, 18/72/10, 20/70/10, and 28/62/10, 

PES/NMP/PEG weight percent of 100-gram polymer 

samples were stirred at 30 °C. Wang et al. [15] followed 

the system PSF/NMP/H2O ( water as a non-solvent 

additive) and also use three concentrations of PSF 

polymer 26/70/4, 28/68/4, and 30/66/4, PSF polymer 

powder was dried at 100 °C for 10 hr. 

   Adding PEG to polymer solution in the system of 

Mustaffar et al. [1] is to enhance porosity on the 

membrane skin layer. Polymer concentration together 

with the solvent ratio is the most significant parameter 

that directly affects membrane properties. Increasing 
concentration leads to an increase in dope solution 

viscosity, dense skin layer becomes thicker, and reduction 

in macro voids, [1] as well as transferring membrane 

structure from finger-like to sponge-like [7]. On the other 

hand, adding a specific amount of non-solvent (water, 

ethanol, acetone) to the polymer solution well provides a 

good membrane porous structure [13-16]. 

 

2.2. Spinning Process 

 

   The spinning process includes several stages as shown 
in Fig. 4, starting with dope solution located in a spinning 

container Fig. 4 No.4 and leaving for 24 hr. to de-bubble 

or de-gas polymer solution [10], [16] [17].   

 

 

 

 



Z. W. Rashad / Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 23,2 (2022) 47 - 53 
 
 

49 
 

   The dope solution was pressed to a spinneret with a 

specific inner and outer diameter by nitrogen pressure, 

0.5, 0.6, 0.75, or 0.8 bar are recommended pressure as the 

morphology of the hollow fiber membrane was not 

affected by changing dope solution pressure in this range 
[12]. 

 
Fig. 4. Spinning process stages, (1) Nitrogen cylinder, (2) 

Pressure valve regulator, (3) Nitrogen pressure gauge, (4) 

Dope solution container, (5) Dope solution control valve, 

(6) Bore fluid container, (7) Dosing pump, (8) Spinneret, 

(9) Air gap, (10) Coagulants bath, (11) Take-up unit, (12) 

Hollow fiber collecting vessel, (13) Distilled water for 

extra wash [12] 

 

a. Air gap 

   Airgap is defined as the distance between the spinneret 

and the external coagulants surface, this distance switches 

the phase inversion process from wet phase inversion to 

dry/wet phase inversion [10]. Many researchers study the 

effect of air gap length on the hollow fiber membrane's 

structure and came back with confusing results about how 

the air gap increase or decrease membrane performance in 

terms of permeation and rejection, Table 1 illustrates 

some of the researcher's conclusion about air gap length 

outcome for polysulfone PSF, Polyvinyl chloride PVC, 
and polyether sulfone PES. 

 

Table 1. Effect of air gap on membrane performance 

reported by different researchers 

Polymer 
Air gap 

length 
Permeation 

Separation 

factor 
Reference 

PSF Increased Decreased Increased Aptel et al. [18] 

PSF Increased No-effect No-effect East et al. [19] 

PSF Increased 

Increased then 

decreased with 

further increase 

of airgap length 

- Kim et al. [20] 

PSF Increased 
Not significantly 

affected 
Increased  Tsai et al. [21] 

PES 15-120 cm Decreased Increased et al. [22] 

PES 0-14.4 cm 
Significant 

decrease 
- 

Chung and Hu 

[23] 

PVC 5-25 cm Increased Decreased Khayet et al. [10] 

 

   For PSF polymer Tsai et al. [21] explained the increase 

in the separation factor is due to the increase in the skin 

layer of the hollow fiber membranes structure. Chung and 

Hu [23] describe the change in permeation as related to 

the high elongation stress of hollow fiber membrane in 
the presence of an air gap. Khayet et al. [10] indicated an 

increase in the mean pores of outer hollow fiber 

membranes surface while the inner pore size almost 

remained the same with increasing air gap and also linked 

this change to elongation force. 

 

b. Bore Fluid and Coagulants 
 

   Bore fluid or internal coagulant is maintained in a 

container Fig. 4 No. 6 and pumped with a dosing pump to 

the inner tube of spinneret together with a dope solution 

which inter the external spinneret tube, bore fluid fed with 
a very low flow rate (2, 3 or 4 ml/min), distilled water at 

room temperature is a good choice [10], [12]. Polymer 

falls from spinneret with a speed rate the same as gravity 

speed [10]. Bore fluid or internal coagulant also a key role 

to control membrane structure, distilled water is a good 

non-solvent for PSF while alcohol (ethanol) is weak, 

choosing the optimized ratio of water/alcohol mixture 

may reduce the big macro-voids in membrane structure 

[15]. 

   Once the nascent hollow fiber membranes touch the 

external coagulation fluid (usually tap water), solvent 
non-solvent exchange occurred and form the asymmetric 

structure, generally the fast the coagulation rate the more 

finger-like macro voids formed while the slow 

coagulation rate gives the favored sponge-like structure 

[13].  

   To slow down the coagulation rate, a small amount of 

solvent additive to bore fluid or coagulant bath well 

reduces the coagulation and induces the formation of a 

sponge-like structure [15]. Appropriate additives should 

be environmentally friendly, low toxicity, and 

commercially available. The best coagulant to be used is 

water, the NMP and DMAC are the best as solvent 
additives [15]. 

   The temperature of coagulants is considered an 

important factor to control membrane structure, Wang et 

al. reported that reducing coagulation bath temperature 

from 27 C to 20 °C increases the membrane permeation 

and decreases the selectivity, while further temperature 

reduction to 10-15 °C leads to a significant reduction in 

membrane selectivity performance due to the formation of 

macro voids on the membrane surface [15].   

 

2.3. Post Treatment 
 

   The final step of fabrication of hollow fiber membrane 

is post-treatment, the importance of post-treatment is to 

avoid membrane collapse and get rid of residual solvent 

[10], [15], [16]. Many researchers reported a different 

kind of post-treatment to protect the membrane from 

damage.  

 



Z. W. Rashad / Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 23,2 (2022) 47 - 53 
 
 

50 
 

   Wang et al. [15] suggest keeping hollow fiber PSF 

membranes in water for 72 hr. followed by a drying step 

at conditions of 25 °C and (60-65%) relative humidity. 

Khayet et al. [10] made it three steps, first, wash hollow 

fiber PVC membranes with water for 48 hr. to remove the 
solvent, and second immerse hollow fiber membranes in 

glycerol aqueous solution of 40% volume ratio to avoid 

collapse, and third dry at room temperature.   

   Another method is to treat hollow fiber membranes with 

non-solvent with low surface tension such as ethanol [13], 

Mansourizadeh & Ismail [13] submerged PSF hollow 

fiber membranes in ethanol for half an hour and then let 

the non-solvent evaporate by air exposure at room 

temperature to prevent pores breakdown. For PES hollow 

fiber membranes, Mustaffar et al. recommended two days 

of water washing, two days of methanol immersion, and a 

drying period by hanging hollow fiber membranes for 7 
days before use.  

 

3- Hollow Fiber Membranes Characterization and 
Performance 

 

   The characterization of hollow fiber membranes was 

evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscope SEM as this 

device gives a clear image of membrane structure in terms 

of skin layer thickness; porosity distribution and pores 

shape also give a good indicator of inner and outer 

diameter measurements [16]. 
   The inner and outer diameter also can be measured by a 

linear Vernier microscope with ±1µm. accuracy [10].    

   Permeation and selectivity performance required a 

specially designed lab-made unit as shown in Fig. 6 which 

was suggested by some researchers.  

   Before explaining the performance system the hollow 

fiber must be cut to more than 20 cm (depending on tube 

design) and secured in a special tube usually made of 

stainless steel with an inlet and outlet open on the side as 

shown in Fig. 5 and get a free end of membranes by 

sealing the two end of the tube with epoxy resins and let it 

cure for 24 hr. [12], [24]. 
 

 
Fig. 5. Hollow fiber membrane special tube [24] 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Fig. 6. Schematic diagram of hollow fiber membrane 

performance system, (1) feed tank, (2) pump, (3) control 

valve, (4) flow meter, (5) gauge pressure, (6) hollow fiber 

tube, (7) gauge pressure, (8) retentate, (9) permeate, (10) 

collecting tank [12] 
 

   Performance system for pure water permeation PWP 

includes forcing distilled water to the inlet tube with 

specific pressure and flow rate and passes through hollow 

fiber membranes from outer to the inner surface and by 

collecting permeates for a specific time, PWP can be 

calculated by the following equation: 

 

𝑃𝑊𝑃𝐹 =
Q

A ΔP
                                                                  (1)  

 

Where: 

Q: volumetric flow rate, l/h 

A: membrane surface area, m2 

ΔP: Pressure drop, bar [25] 
 

For rejection calculation, a solution with a specific 

amount of PEG (800, 1000 ppm) [12], [16] is pumped 

instead of distilled water and the equation used was as 

follows: 

 

𝑅(%) = ( 1 −
𝐶𝑝

𝐶𝑓
 ) × 100                                               (2) 

 

Where: 

Cp: concentration of PEG of permeation, ppm 

Cf: concentration of PEG of the feed solution, ppm [25] 
 

Note: UV spectrometer is used to find concentration by 

knowing PEG wavelength and create a calibration curve 

 

4- Conclusion   
 

   There are many factors to be controlled in the 

fabrication of hollow fiber membranes. Some of these 

factors direly affect the structure of the membrane and 
eventually, the overall performance and even slight 

change give a different morphology.  

   It is important to keep operating conditions constant 

when studying the change of specific factor. 

 

 



Z. W. Rashad / Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 23,2 (2022) 47 - 53 
 
 

51 
 

1- Polymer concentration is remarked as the most 
effective on the morphology of hollow fiber 

membranes, the high the concentration the thick the  

skin layer, and a more sponge-like structure is 

produced. From researcher reports, 14% of polymer 
concentration and above is a good start, not to forget 

the effect of suitable additives to the dope solution on 

the performance of the membranes. DMAC is a 

suitable solvent for a different type of polymers as it is 

miscible with water and have good thermal and 

chemical stability  
2- The air gap was the most conflicting factor, however, 

5-10 cm of air gap was expected to enhance 

membranes selectivity, especially for PSF and PES 

while decreasing it for PVC  

3- Water is fantastic for bore fluid and coagulants with 
appropriate additives, alcohol in a coagulant bath 
gives a reduction in macro-voids formation. A small 

amount of solvent like DMAC to bore fluid or 

coagulation bath raises the sponge-like structure of 

membranes 

4- Post-treatment of hollow fiber membranes has two 
main reasons, wash residual solvent, and prevent 

membrane collapse.  

5- Finally, the favorite performance (increasing 
permeation or selectivity) of hollow fiber membranes 

depends on its application, gas separation, or drinking 

water production 
 

Abbreviation 

PSF:  Poly Sulfone 

PES Poly Ether Sulfone 

PVC Poly Vinyl Chloride 

RO Reverse Osmosis 

NF Nano Filtration 

LPHF  Low Pressure Hollow Fiber 

UF Ultra-Filtration 

NMP N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone 

DMAC N,Ndimethyl acetamide 

SEM Scanning Electron Microscope 

PWPF Pure Water Permeation 

UV Ultraviolet  

 

References 

 

[1] M. I. Mustaffar, A. F. Ismail, and R. M. Illias. 
"Study on the effect of polymer concentration on 

hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane performance 

and morphology." In Regional Symposium on 

Membrane Science and Technology, Malaysia. 

2004. 

[2] M. S. M. Ali, "Development of integrally skinned 
polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane: effect of 

casting parameter." PhD diss., MSc. Thesis, 
University Sains Malaysia, 2005. 

 

[3] Van Vught, F. A., Willem Franciscus Catherina 
Kools, and België te Hoogstraten. "Membrane 

formation by phase inversion in multicomponent 

polymer system." PhD diss., University of Twente, 

1998. 
[4] Nunes, Suzana Pereira, and Klaus-Viktor 

Peinemann. "Membrane technology in the chemical 

industry second." Environmental Engineering and 

Management Journal 6, no. 1,  75-76, 2007. 

[5] S. A Altınkaya, "Modeling of asymmetric membrane 
formation by a combination of dry/wet phase 

inversion processes." Desalination 2006. 

[6] W. Chinpa,. "Preparation and characterization of an 
asymmetric porous poly (vinyl chloride)/poly 

(methyl methacrylate-comethacrylic acid) 

membrane." ScienceAsia 34  385-389, 2008. 

[7] A. Nazif, H. Karkhanechi, E. Saljoughi, S. 
Mahmoud Mousavi and H. Matsuyama, "Effective 

Parameters on Fabrication and Modification of Braid 

Hollow Fiber Membranes: A Review." Membranes 

11, no. 11, 884, 2021. 

[8]  Ali Behboudi, Sanaz Ghiasi, Toraj Mohammadi, 
Mathias Ulbricht "Preparation and characterization 

of asymmetric hollow fiber polyvinyl chloride 

(PVC) membrane for forward osmosis 

application." Separation and Purification 

Technology 270 2021: 118801. 

[9] J. Tian, Z. Chen, Y. Yang, H. Liang, J. Nan, and G. 
Li, "Consecutive chemical cleaning of fouled PVC 

membrane using NaOH and ethanol during 

ultrafiltration of river water." Water Research 44, 

no. 1, pp. 59-68, 2010. 

[10] M. Khayet, M.C. García-Payoa, F.A. Qusayb, and 
M.A. Zubaidy, "Structural and performance studies 

of poly (vinyl chloride) hollow fiber membranes 

prepared at different air gap lengths." Journal of 

Membrane Science 330, no. 1-2, pp.30-39, 2009. 

[11] Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 6th 
Edition, Wiley Inter Science, Weinheim, 2002. 

[12] N. K. Taieh, "Preparation and Characterization of 
PVC Hollow       Fiber Membranes for Ultrafiltration 

Application", MSc. Thesis, TECHNICAL  

COLLEGE-BAGHDAD, Iraq, 2010. 

[13] A. MANSOURIZADEH1 & A. FAUZI ISMAIL, 
"EFFECTS OF FABRICATION PARAMETERS 

ON THE MORPHOLOGY OF POROUS 

POLYSULFONE HOLLOW FIBER 

MEMBRANES.", Jurnal Teknologi, 49(F), pp. 81–

89, Dis. 2008. 

[14] Tamino people and molecules, "Dimethylacetamide 
Technical Data Sheet", Retrieved from 
https://www.eastman.com/pages/taminco.aspx 

march, 2011 

[15] D. Wang, W.K. Teo a, and K. Li, "Preparation and 
characterization of high-flux polysulfone hollow 

fibre gas separation membranes." Journal of 

membrane science 204, no. 1-2, pp.247-256, 2002. 

 

 

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ahmad-Ismail-18/publication/242413936_Study_on_the_effect_of_polymer_concentration_on_hollow_fiber_ultrafiltration_membrane_performance_and_morphology/links/0046352df074675218000000/Study-on-the-effect-of-polymer-concentration-on-hollow-fiber-ultrafiltration-membrane-performance-and-morphology.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ahmad-Ismail-18/publication/242413936_Study_on_the_effect_of_polymer_concentration_on_hollow_fiber_ultrafiltration_membrane_performance_and_morphology/links/0046352df074675218000000/Study-on-the-effect-of-polymer-concentration-on-hollow-fiber-ultrafiltration-membrane-performance-and-morphology.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ahmad-Ismail-18/publication/242413936_Study_on_the_effect_of_polymer_concentration_on_hollow_fiber_ultrafiltration_membrane_performance_and_morphology/links/0046352df074675218000000/Study-on-the-effect-of-polymer-concentration-on-hollow-fiber-ultrafiltration-membrane-performance-and-morphology.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ahmad-Ismail-18/publication/242413936_Study_on_the_effect_of_polymer_concentration_on_hollow_fiber_ultrafiltration_membrane_performance_and_morphology/links/0046352df074675218000000/Study-on-the-effect-of-polymer-concentration-on-hollow-fiber-ultrafiltration-membrane-performance-and-morphology.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ahmad-Ismail-18/publication/242413936_Study_on_the_effect_of_polymer_concentration_on_hollow_fiber_ultrafiltration_membrane_performance_and_morphology/links/0046352df074675218000000/Study-on-the-effect-of-polymer-concentration-on-hollow-fiber-ultrafiltration-membrane-performance-and-morphology.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ahmad-Ismail-18/publication/242413936_Study_on_the_effect_of_polymer_concentration_on_hollow_fiber_ultrafiltration_membrane_performance_and_morphology/links/0046352df074675218000000/Study-on-the-effect-of-polymer-concentration-on-hollow-fiber-ultrafiltration-membrane-performance-and-morphology.pdf
https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/files/6077441/t0000005.pdf
https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/files/6077441/t0000005.pdf
https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/files/6077441/t0000005.pdf
https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/files/6077441/t0000005.pdf
https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/files/6077441/t0000005.pdf
http://www.eemj.eu/index.php/EEMJ/article/view/321
http://www.eemj.eu/index.php/EEMJ/article/view/321
http://www.eemj.eu/index.php/EEMJ/article/view/321
http://www.eemj.eu/index.php/EEMJ/article/view/321
https://gcris.iyte.edu.tr/handle/11147/2170
https://gcris.iyte.edu.tr/handle/11147/2170
https://gcris.iyte.edu.tr/handle/11147/2170
https://www.thaiscience.info/Journals/Article/SCAS/10460458.pdf
https://www.thaiscience.info/Journals/Article/SCAS/10460458.pdf
https://www.thaiscience.info/Journals/Article/SCAS/10460458.pdf
https://www.thaiscience.info/Journals/Article/SCAS/10460458.pdf
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/11/11/884
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/11/11/884
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/11/11/884
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/11/11/884
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0375/11/11/884
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138358662100513X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138358662100513X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138358662100513X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138358662100513X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138358662100513X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138358662100513X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135409005673
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135409005673
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135409005673
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135409005673
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135409005673
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037673880801048X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037673880801048X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037673880801048X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037673880801048X
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037673880801048X
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/14356007
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/14356007
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Amir-Mansourizadeh/publication/237535436_EFFECTS_OF_FABRICATION_PARAMETERS_ON_THE_MORPHOLOGY_OF_POROUS_POLYSULFONE_HOLLOW_FIBER_MEMBRANES/links/0046352cf43ba8d5a2000000/EFFECTS-OF-FABRICATION-PARAMETERS-ON-THE-MORPHOLOGY-OF-POROUS-POLYSULFONE-HOLLOW-FIBER-MEMBRANES.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Amir-Mansourizadeh/publication/237535436_EFFECTS_OF_FABRICATION_PARAMETERS_ON_THE_MORPHOLOGY_OF_POROUS_POLYSULFONE_HOLLOW_FIBER_MEMBRANES/links/0046352cf43ba8d5a2000000/EFFECTS-OF-FABRICATION-PARAMETERS-ON-THE-MORPHOLOGY-OF-POROUS-POLYSULFONE-HOLLOW-FIBER-MEMBRANES.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Amir-Mansourizadeh/publication/237535436_EFFECTS_OF_FABRICATION_PARAMETERS_ON_THE_MORPHOLOGY_OF_POROUS_POLYSULFONE_HOLLOW_FIBER_MEMBRANES/links/0046352cf43ba8d5a2000000/EFFECTS-OF-FABRICATION-PARAMETERS-ON-THE-MORPHOLOGY-OF-POROUS-POLYSULFONE-HOLLOW-FIBER-MEMBRANES.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Amir-Mansourizadeh/publication/237535436_EFFECTS_OF_FABRICATION_PARAMETERS_ON_THE_MORPHOLOGY_OF_POROUS_POLYSULFONE_HOLLOW_FIBER_MEMBRANES/links/0046352cf43ba8d5a2000000/EFFECTS-OF-FABRICATION-PARAMETERS-ON-THE-MORPHOLOGY-OF-POROUS-POLYSULFONE-HOLLOW-FIBER-MEMBRANES.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Amir-Mansourizadeh/publication/237535436_EFFECTS_OF_FABRICATION_PARAMETERS_ON_THE_MORPHOLOGY_OF_POROUS_POLYSULFONE_HOLLOW_FIBER_MEMBRANES/links/0046352cf43ba8d5a2000000/EFFECTS-OF-FABRICATION-PARAMETERS-ON-THE-MORPHOLOGY-OF-POROUS-POLYSULFONE-HOLLOW-FIBER-MEMBRANES.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Amir-Mansourizadeh/publication/237535436_EFFECTS_OF_FABRICATION_PARAMETERS_ON_THE_MORPHOLOGY_OF_POROUS_POLYSULFONE_HOLLOW_FIBER_MEMBRANES/links/0046352cf43ba8d5a2000000/EFFECTS-OF-FABRICATION-PARAMETERS-ON-THE-MORPHOLOGY-OF-POROUS-POLYSULFONE-HOLLOW-FIBER-MEMBRANES.pdf
https://www.eastman.com/pages/taminco.aspx
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738802000479
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738802000479
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738802000479
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738802000479


Z. W. Rashad / Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 23,2 (2022) 47 - 53 
 
 

52 
 

[16] F. M. Hussein, A. S. Merzah, and Z. W. Rashad, 
“PREPARATION OF PVC HOLLOW FIBER 

MEMBRANE USING (DMAC/ACETONE)”, 

IJCPE, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 81–87, Dec. 2014. 

[17] A. Al-Obaidy, “A Morphological Study of Alumina 
Hollow Fiber Membrane”, IJCPE, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 

117–123, Sep. 2016. 

[18] P. Aptel, N. Abidine, F. Ivaldi, J.P. Lafaille, 
"Polysulfone hollowfibres-effect of spinning 

conditions on ultrafiltration properties", J. Membr. 

Sci. 22, pp. 199–215, 1985. 

[19] G.C. East, J.E. McIntyre, V. Rogers, S.C. Senn, 
"Production of porous hollow polysulfone fibers for 

gas separation, in: Proceedings of the Fourth BOC" 

Priestly Conference, 62., Royal Society of 

Chemistry, London, 1986. 

[20] H. Kim, Y.I. Park, J. Jagel, K.H. Lee, "The effects of 
spinning conditions on the structure formation and 

the dimension of the hollow-fiber membranes and 

their relationship with the permeability in dry–wet 

spinning technology", J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 57 

(1995) 1637–1645. 

[21] N.H.A. Tsai, D.H. Huang, S.C. Fan, Y.C. Yang, 
C.L. Li, K.R. Lee, J.Y. Lai, Investigation of 

surfactant addition effect on the vapor permeation of 

aqueous ethanol mixtures through polysulfone 

hollow fiber membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 198 (2002) 

245–258. 
[22] X. Miao, S. Sourirajan, H. Zhang,W.W.Y. Lau, 

"Production of polyethersulfone hollow fiber 

ultrafiltration membranes. Part I. Effects of water 

(internal coagulant) flow rate and length of air gap", 

Sep. Sci. Technol. 31 (1996) 141–156. 

[23] T.S. Chung, X. Hu, Effect of air gap distance on the 
morphology and thermal properties or 

polyethersulfone hollow fibers, J. Appl. Polymer 

Sci. 66 (1997) 1067–1077. 

[24] Z. W. Rashad, "Operating System for Preparation 
Hollow Fiber Membranes Using for Water 

Treatment" project research H.D., Technical Collage 
Baghdad, 2012. 

[25] Y. Yang, D.Yang, S. Zhang, J. Wang, and X. Jian, 
"Preparation and characterization of poly 

(phthalazinone ether sulfone ketone) hollow fiber 

ultrafiltration membranes with excellent thermal 

stability." Journal of membrane science 280, no. 1-2 

(2006): 957-968. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://ijcpe.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/ijcpe/article/view/300
https://ijcpe.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/ijcpe/article/view/300
https://ijcpe.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/ijcpe/article/view/300
https://ijcpe.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/ijcpe/article/view/300
https://ijcpe.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/ijcpe/article/view/219
https://ijcpe.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/ijcpe/article/view/219
https://ijcpe.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/ijcpe/article/view/219
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738800812806
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738800812806
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738800812806
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738800812806
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/app.1995.070571310
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/app.1995.070571310
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/app.1995.070571310
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/app.1995.070571310
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/app.1995.070571310
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/app.1995.070571310
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738801006615
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738801006615
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738801006615
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738801006615
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738801006615
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738801006615
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01496399608000687
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01496399608000687
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01496399608000687
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01496399608000687
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01496399608000687
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971107)66:6%3C1067::AID-APP7%3E3.0.CO;2-G
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971107)66:6%3C1067::AID-APP7%3E3.0.CO;2-G
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971107)66:6%3C1067::AID-APP7%3E3.0.CO;2-G
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971107)66:6%3C1067::AID-APP7%3E3.0.CO;2-G
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zaid-Rashad/publication/328726011_Operating_System_for_Preparation_Hollow_Fiber_Membranes_Using_for_Water_Treatment/links/5bde195fa6fdcc3a8dbcb75d/Operating-System-for-Preparation-Hollow-Fiber-Membranes-Using-for-Water-Treatment.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zaid-Rashad/publication/328726011_Operating_System_for_Preparation_Hollow_Fiber_Membranes_Using_for_Water_Treatment/links/5bde195fa6fdcc3a8dbcb75d/Operating-System-for-Preparation-Hollow-Fiber-Membranes-Using-for-Water-Treatment.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zaid-Rashad/publication/328726011_Operating_System_for_Preparation_Hollow_Fiber_Membranes_Using_for_Water_Treatment/links/5bde195fa6fdcc3a8dbcb75d/Operating-System-for-Preparation-Hollow-Fiber-Membranes-Using-for-Water-Treatment.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zaid-Rashad/publication/328726011_Operating_System_for_Preparation_Hollow_Fiber_Membranes_Using_for_Water_Treatment/links/5bde195fa6fdcc3a8dbcb75d/Operating-System-for-Preparation-Hollow-Fiber-Membranes-Using-for-Water-Treatment.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738806001906
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738806001906
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738806001906
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738806001906
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738806001906
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376738806001906


Z. W. Rashad / Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 23,2 (2022) 47 - 53 
 
 

53 
 

 

 تحضير االغشية النفاذية المجوفة ورقة مراجعة في دراسة وتحليل ظروف التشغيل لعملية 
 

 زيد وعدهللا رشاد 
 

 جامعة بغداد/كلية الهندسة 
 

 الخالصة 
 

تنتج االغشية النفاذية المجوفة عن طريق عملية فيزيائية تسمى انقالب الطور الرطب أو الجاف / الرطب.     
وانتهاًء   التصنيع،  مواد  اختيار  من  )بدًءا  مختلفة  عوامل  على  وتعتمد  الخطوات  من  العديد  التقنية  تتضمن 

ت محلًيا(.  المصنوعة  المجوفة  النفاذية  لالغشية  الالحقة  أهم  بالمعالجة  على  الضوء  هذه  المراجعة  دراسة  سلط 
الداخلي   التركيب  توصيف  في  وتتحكم  تؤثر  التي  الفائق  ألالعوامل  الترشيح  ذات  المجوفة  األلياف  غشية 

 المستخدمة في التطبيقات المختلفة.
سلفون       )بولي  البوليمرات  من  مختلفة  أنواع  ثالثة  على  باالعتماد  الدراسة  سلف  PSFتمت  إيثر  بولي  ون  ، 

PES    و بولي فينيل كلوريدPVC  لدراسة تغير مورفولوجيا االغشية الليفية المجوفة مع عوامل تصنيع مختلفة )
تاثير   دراسة  المراد  العامل  وتغيير  التشغيل  عند  تثبيتها  يجب  والتي  المؤثرة  للعوامل  معقولة  بداية  نقطة  وإعطاء 

 تغييره على االغشية.
 

 النفاذية المجوفة, انقالب الطور, عملية الترشيح, البوليمر الكلمات الدالة: االغشية