Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension DOI: https://doi.org/10.31351/vol30iss2pp86-98 86 Preparation and In vitro Characterization of Aceclofenac Nanosuspension (ACNS) for Enhancement of Percutaneous Absorption using Hydrogel Dosage Form Aseel Kadhem Thamer*,1and Ahmed Najim Abood** *Basrah Health Directorate, Al-Fayhaa Teaching Hospital. ** Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq. Abstract Aceclofenac (AC) is an orally active phenyl acetic acid derivative, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with exceptional anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic properties. It has low aqueous solubility, leading to slow dissolution and inadequate bioavailability(15%). The aim of the current study was to prepare and characterize AC-NS-based gel to enhance the dissolution rate and then percutaneous permeability. NS.s were prepared using solvent/antisovent precipitation method at different drug to polymer ratios (1:1, 1:2, and 1:3) using poly vinyl pyrrolidone (PVP-K25), hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC-E5) and poloxamer® (388) as stabilizers alone and in combinations of two polymers (1:2 and 1:4 drug: polymer ratio). Fifteen formulas of AC-NS.s were prepared and characterized for loading efficiency, particle size, polydispersity index and physical stability. The best formulas of NS were F11 (PVP K25, poloxamer® 338 and AC), and F15 (HPMC E5, poloxamer® 338 and AC) that gave the best results of physical stability and entrapment efficiency which were lyophilized to be characterized by FTIR, DSC, P-XRD and SEM. After that, the best prepared formula of AC-NS regarding the involved characterization methods was incorporated in gel dosage forms using (1% W/V carbopol®940). From this study, we conclude that the solubility and dissolution rate of AC were improved when the particle size was reduced to Nano-scale as compared with pure drug. Keywords: Aceclofenac, Nanosuspension, Solvent/ antisolvent method, Hydrogel. طبقات لوفيناك لزياده امتصاص الدواء فياسيكلعقارالتحضير والتقييم المختبري للمعلق النانوي ل الجلد باستخدام الهالم كشكل دوائي **احمد نجم عبودو 1*،اسيل كاظم ثامر مستشفى الفيحاء التعليمي . -دائرة صحة البصرة* . فرع الصيدالنيات،كلية الصيدلة،جامعة البصرة،البصرة،العراق** الخالصة دواء اسيكلوفيناك مشتق من حامض فينيل اسيتك . فعال عن طريق الفم وهو عقار مضاد لاللتهاب غير السترويدي ،مسكن لاللم وخافض ٪( ١٥ن في الماء مما يؤدي الى انحالل بطئ ونفاذيه منخفضة وعدم كفاية التوافر الحيوي)للحراره .يعاني االسكلوفيناك من انخفاض قابلية الذوبا جلد .تم .الهدف من الدراسة الحالية هو تحضير وتوصيف هالم مائي قائم على المعلقات النانوية لتعزيز معدل الذوبان ومن ثم النفاذيه عن طريق ال باستخدام نسب مختلفه من العقار والبوليمر )العقار: البوليمر( ترسيب باستخدام المذيب/مضاد المذيب(تحضير المعلقات النانوية باستخدام طريقة )ال ( كل على حدة او بمزجها معا. ( باستخدام )بولي فينيل بيروليدون،هيدروكسي بروبيل ميثيل سيليولوز و البولوكسيميرات١:٤، ۳:١، ۲:١، ١:١) ت النانوية وتميزت بكفاءة االنتاج والتحميل وتم اجراء االختبارات المختلفة عليها مثل حجم الجسيم والثبات تم تحضير خمسة عشر صيغة من المعلقا ، تحويل الفيزيائي ثم بعد ذلك جففت جزيئات المعلق النانوي واجريت عليها اختبارات اخرى مثل المجهر االلكتروني الماسح ، مسعر المسح التبايني لصنع الهالم المائي. ستنتج ٪١بنسبة ٩٤٠تحت الحمراء واختبار حيود المسحوق. ثم تم دمج المعلقات النانوية مع الكاربوبول فورييه الطيفي باالشعه . من نتائج التجربة انه تم تحسين الذوبانية والنفاذية لعقار االسكلوفيناك عندما تم تقليل حجم الجسيمات الى المستوى النانوي . المائي الكلمات المفتاحية: اسكلوفيناك ،المعلقات النانوية،طريقة الترسيب باستخدام المذيب/المذيب المضاد ، الهالم Introduction The word ‘solubility’ is defined as a maximum quantity of solute that can be dissolved in a given amount of solvent. There are various techniques for solubility enhancement like particle size reduction, solid dispersion, use of surfactants, pH modification, complexation, hydrotrophy, use of co-solvent and others (1). When the particle becomes smaller, the surface area with volume ratio will be increases. The large surface area enables greater contact with the solvent which lead to elevate solubility. Nanoparticles are particulate dispersions or solid particles with a size between 10-1000nm (2). 1Corresponding author E-mail: kadhemaseel@gmail.com Received: 4/1/2021 Accepted: 1/3 /2021 Published Online First: 2021-12-09 Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Science https://doi.org/10.31351/vol30iss2pp86-98 Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 87 Nanoparticles stabilization is crucial to ensure their effectiveness. The massive rise in surface area causes excessive surface energy, which is undesirable thermodynamically. The increase in surface energy accelerates particle agglomeration to reduce over-energy on the surface. Agglomeration affects over all stability of the formulation of Nanoparticles3. Polymers like Poloxamers® (338), HPMC (E5), PVP (K25) and others provide stabilization for nanoparticles by surface binding as well as through the steric bulk of their three- dimensional structure (4). AC is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, it is a phenyl acetic acid derivative (figure-1), white crystalline solid, almost insoluble in water and soluble in ethanol (96%). After oral administration AC is absorbed and undergoes first pass hepatic metabolism (5). It is recommended for the short and long term therapy of the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis (6). Figure 1. Chemical structure of Aceclofenac (5) Hydrogel is a water-swollen, cross-linked polymeric network formed by the simple reaction of one or more monomers (7). The main objective of this study is to modify AC particles to be prepared as NS using solvent/anti-solvent precipitation method and then incorporated in gel forming NS-based hydrogel type with improved dissolution rate and dermatological permeation. Materials and Methods Materials Aceclofenac powder (AC), poloxamer® (338) were purchased from Lishui Nanming Chemical Co., Ltd (China). PVP®-K25, HPMC-E5 and carbopol® 940 are gifts from Sama Alfayhaa for pharmaceutical industries. All other materials are of analytical grades. Methods Characterization of aceclofenac powder Determination of melting point Melting point was determined by digital melting point apparatus. A few quantity of AC sample was taken and placed in a thin walled capillary tube which placed and heated in the device, when the sample start to melt, the melting point was recorded (8). Spectrophotometric analysis AC powder (50mg) was weighed and dissolved in (50 ml) of each of ethanol, phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and DW (in presence of ethanol 1% (V/V) as co-solvent) 9 to get stock solutions with concentrations (1mg/ml). From which, serial dilutions were made and inspected spectrophotometrically. The λmax values were determined and matched with literatures values (9). The absorbance values of resultant diluted solutions were measured by UV-visible spectrophotometer using the respective blank solvents (10). Determination of saturation solubility Excess amounts of AC powder were put in (25ml-conical flasks) containing (20ml) of each of the involved media as reported by Maulvi et al. After that, the conical flasks were shaken with orbital shaking incubator at 37± 0.1°C for 24 hours, then kept in the incubator at 37°C for 24hours until equilibrium existed, the supernatant solution filtered through a 0.45μm filter paper and analyzed spectrophotometrically, three determinations were carried out (11). Preparation of AC-Nanosuspensions Solvent/anti-solvent precipitation process was used to prepare AC-NS. (100mg) of AC powder was dissolved in 2ml of ethanol, then added by syringe dropping into (50ml) of D.W. containing fixed quantities of one stabilizer or combined- stabilizers at room temperature and subsequently stirred by using magnetic stirrer at (800rpm) for (1hour) at (40℃) to allow volatile solvents to evaporate (12). The compositions of the prepared formulas (1-15) were illustrated in Table (1). Evaluation of the prepared AC-NS.s Measurement of particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) Analysis of particle size was done using Malvern Mastersizer 2000 MS (Worcestershire, Great Britain). Average particle size and PDI of the prepared NS formulas were observed (The results of particle size was recorded as an average value depending on the device setting) to ensure that the particles are within Nano-range size and PDI is acceptable (13). Measurement of % entrapment efficiency (%EE) Freshly prepared drug-loaded NS.s were centrifuged at 12500 rpm for 20 minutes. The concentration of drug in the supernatant was spectrophotometrically determined after filtration through 0.45μm filter paper at the estimated λmax. The EE of AC was calculated as follows (14). %EE= 𝑊𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑟𝑢𝑔−𝑊𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑢𝑔 𝑊𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑟𝑢𝑔 × %100 (1) Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 88 Table 1. Compositions of AC NS.s formulas using different stabilizers at different drug: stabilizer ratios with constant volume of injected organic solution (2 ml). Formula code Aceclofenac amount (mg) PVP K25 Amount (mg) HPMC (E5) Amount (mg) Poloxamer (338) Amount (mg) F1 100 100 F2 100 200 F3 100 300 F4 100 100 F5 100 200 F6 100 300 F7 100 100 F8 100 200 F9 100 300 F10 100 100 100 F11 100 200 200 F12 100 100 100 F13 100 200 200 Physical stability assessment The prepared NS formulas were stored in a dark place at an ambient temperature for up to seven days. During this time, the particle size and visual appearance were monitored and determined (15). Lyophilization of the prepared NS formulas For further characterization, the best formulas were lyophilized using freeze dryer (Labconco USA). The powder yields were kept in a tight container at room temperature (16). Characterization of the lyophilized powder Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis The particle morphology of lyophilized powder and unprocessed drug were characterized by using SEM. A small fraction was fixed on a double- sided conductive carbon tape and sputter-coated with 5 nm of a Pt–Pd alloy (17). Compatibility studies Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) This test was used to examine the physical compatibility between AC, additives and methods conditions. The samples were precisely weighed and sealed hermetically with aluminum lid. The thermograms of lyophilized AC formulas and pure drug powder were recorded (18). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) FTIR scanning of KBr pellets containing powder samples of pure drug, lyophilized formulas in the wave number range 400-4000 cm-1 at a resolution of 4 cm-1 with speed of 2 mm/sec (19), Powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD) Using a Diano X-ray diffractometer (USA) equipped with Co-Kα radiation (45 kV, 9 mA, scanned from 3 ° to 50 ° at 2 angles), samples from pure drug and lyophilized formulas powders were analyzed (20). Preparation of NS-based hydrogel Carbopol®940 was used as gelling agent in concentration of (1%) to prepare NS-based hydrogel from the selected AC-NS formula. The calculated amount of carbopol was dispersed in water using a magnetic stirrer with a speed of (1000 rpm) for (1 hour) until getting uniform dispersion, then a freshly prepared AC-NS formula (the selected one) was gradually added to the aqueous dispersion of carbopol. After that (1.6) ml glycerin was added as a viscosity modifier. Finally, few drops of tri- ethanolamine were added to initiate the hydrogel formation (21). The prepared hydrogel had been allowed to stand overnight to clear stuck air, then the prepared hydrogel formula was sealed in a tightly closed container at room temperature in a dark place for other tests (22). Additionally, by the same procedure, plain hydrogel was prepared using AC pure form. Evaluation of the prepared hydrogel Measurement of pH The pH of the prepared hydrogel formula was determined using a pH meter at room temperature. This was done by fully placing the glass electrode in the gel system and recording pH (23). Spreadability Hydrogel formulas were found to be spreadable or not after (48 hour) of preparation, by measuring 2 g of gel spreading-diameter between two (10X10 cm) glass plates. Determination of diameter after 1 minute of applying the weight. The spreadability can be calculated using the following equation: Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 89 S = m.l / t …….. (2) Where: S is spreadability, m is the weight tied to the upper slide, l is the length of the glass slide and t is time consumed (24). Rheological studies (Viscosity analysis) They were done by Drawell NDJ-8S viscometer. The hydrogel was filled in a wide mouth container, so that the viscometer's spindle could be appropriately dipped without touching the bottom of jar. Hydrogel samples were permitted to settle at constant temperature more than 30min. The viscosity was measured by increasing the speed of rotation starting from 0.3 rpm to 60 rpm. This done by using a spindle (number 4). The measurements were recorded at temperature of 25°C (25) . In vitro drug release study The NS-based hydrogel release analysis was performed by using assembly franze diffusion cell26 using a tube in which one end covered by dialysis membrane (8000-14000 Dalton cut-off) that is soaked in a freshly prepared diffusion medium (phosphate buffer pH 7.4) over night. A specific amount of hydrogel equivalent to (100 mg) of AC was taken and spread on a semi-permeable dialysis membrane, the tube was partially submerged in a jar containing buffer. The temperature was held at 32± 0.5 °C stirred at 100 rpm. Two milliliters-sample was taken at different time intervals and the drug concentration was spectrophotometrically determined at the determined λmax. against a suitable blank (27). The obtained data were fitted to different mathematical expressions to describe the kinetic and mechanism of aceclofenac release from the selected nanosuspension formulas with the help of DDSolver: An add-in program in Microsoft Excel (28). The kinetic models (zero order, first order, Higuchi model and Korsmeyer – Peppas) were used29. The model that produced the highest correlation coefficient was selected as the best fitted model. Stability studies (Effect of temperature) For the assessment of the stability, the prepared hydrogel formula was kept at different temperature degrees: a refrigerator (4 °C), oven (40 °C) and room temperature (25 °C) for three months. Samples were periodically withdrawn and tested for the physical appearance, homogeneity and viscosity (30). Statistical analysis The results of particle size was recorded as an average value depending on the device setting, while others have been mostly provided as the mean value of triplicate readings ± standard deviation and have been assayed statistically using (ANOVA) test for estimation if changes of involved variables have been statistically significant at level (P ≤ 0.05) and non-significant at level of (p>0.05). Results and Discussion Determination of melting point It was found to be (156-158 °C) which is the same as reported reflecting the purity of the powder used in the study (31). Spectrophotometric analysis The estimated λmax is 275nm that is agreed with the reported values (32). Figures (2-A, 2-B and 2-C) showed the calibration curves in the involved media. A straight lines were obtained indicating that the calibration curves obeys Beer-lambert law within the range of concentrations used (33). Figure 2. Calibration curves of AC in ethanol, phosphate buffer pH 7.4 and D.W. Saturated solubility of AC powder The saturation solubility values of AC at different media were summarized in Table (2). From which, we conclude that AC is practically insoluble Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 90 in water and soluble in ethanol34. The aqueous solubility will be increased by increasing pH due to weakly acidic properties of drug as in phosphate buffer medium pH 7.4 (35). Table 2. Solubility of AC at 37± 0.1 ℃ in different media (n=3) Preparation of AC-NS In this study, fifteen formulas of AC-NS.s were prepared having particle size values within nanometer range as illustrated in Tables (3 and 4) which are exposed for several characterization methods to get the best one. Table 3. Particle size, polydispersity index values of the prepared formulas using different types and amount of single stabilizer Formula code Average particle size (nm) PDI F1 270 0.3 F2 202 0.3 F3 164 0.3 F4 198 0.09 F5 271 0.07 F6 220 0.07 F7 98 0.3 F8 112 0.3 F9 85 0.3 Table 4.Particle size and PDI values for the prepared formulas (using combined stabilizers) Characterization of the prepared AC-NS formulas Particle size and PDI measurements The most important characterization parameters for the prepared NS.s are the average particle size and PDI which governs the physicochemical properties like saturation solubility, dissolution velocity and physical stability (36). The usual range of PDI obtained values are (0.1- 0.25) which indicates narrow size distribution while PDI value more than 0.5 refer to very broad distribution (37). The PDI values of prepared formulas were ranged from (0.06-0.3). The best formulas (F11 and F15) have Nano-sized particle with low PDI values (0.06 and 0.09) respectively as shown in Table (4) which indicates good uniformity of nanoparticles. Stabilizers such as HPMC, PVP and poloxamer were incorporated to prevent sedimentation, agglomeration and crystal formation (38). In addition to the safety and regulatory requirements, the choice of stabilizer is based on their ability to provide particle surface wetting and a barrier to prevent agglomeration of nanoparticles. Formulas (F1-F3) give a good average particle size especially at drug: polymer ratio (1:3) with remarkable increase in average particle size, this may be due to role of PVP in inhibiting guest molecule crystallization and its excellent efficiency as agent for coating and high affinity of polymer to the nanoparticals surface (39). Formulas F4-F6, also give a good average particle size with increase in size when changing the concentration of the polymer reaching to drug: polymer ratio (1:3). This is attributed to the fact, HPMC has both a hydrophobic alkyl chain and hydrophilic OH- in its side chain. On the Nano crystalline surface, the hydrophobic alkyl chain can be adsorbed, while the hydrophilic OH- groups are exposed to increase the wettability of the Nano crystals (40). Formulas F7-F9 had the best average size, at drug: polymer ratio 1:3, it gave (85 nm) size, this because of its high molecular weight and a greater polypropylene oxide (PPO) region of poloxamer. Therefore, because of adsorption occurs via this hydrophobic PPO block, it has more 'anchoring capacity' to the nanoparticle surface (41). Optimum stabilizer concentration is needed where the use of insufficient amount of stabilizer may not provide complete coverage of the drug surface, thus jeopardizing steric repulsion between particles (42). In our study, we see that as the concentration of stabilizer increases, the average particle size was decreased as seen in Table (3) in which the formulas coded (F3 and F9) give smaller particle sizes (164 and 85nm) respectively at which highest amount of polymers use. According to the above result a smaller particle size (85nm) was seen when using poloxamer 338 in higher amount, since this polymer show reduction in average particle size because of the high molecular weight of polymer. Smaller average particle size values were obtained for F11 about (43 nm) and F15 about (45 Media Saturation solubility (mg/ml) ± SD D.W 0.07 + 0.01 Phosphate buffer 7.4 14.2 + 0.04 Ethanol 40 + 0.02 Formula code Average Particle size (nm) PDI F10 72 0.09 F11 43 0.06 F12 242 0.1 F13 237 0.07 F14 41 0.1 F15 45 0.09 Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 91 nm) when using combination of (PVP K25 + Poloxamer 338) and (HPMC + Poloxamer 338) respectively at ratio of (1 drug: 4 polymer) as shown in Table (4). So these combinations showed a significant reduction in the average particle size (p< 0.05). Also these formulas (F11 and F15) have PDI values (0.06 and 0.09) respectively which indicates a good polydispersity. These results may be obtained because of an excellent surface affinity of stabilizers toward drug molecules forming a large mechanical and thermodynamic barrier at the interface (43). The ratio of drug to polymer (1:4) looked to be optimum due to the effect of amount of polymer on the properties of the nanoparticles. The reason may be due to the fact, the viscous polymer solution has more difficulty to break up into smaller droplets at the same mixing input strength, leading to a rise in particle size (44). Determination of %EE The %EE values of the prepared formulas were ranged from 86.3(F9) to 94.2 % (F15) as showed in Table (5). There is no significant difference (p>0.05) between the prepared AC-NS.s which may give an impression of suitability of stabilizer mechanism (steric stabilization) especially when used in combination that give synergistic effect for stabilization of AC nanoparticles44. It is clear that the increase in stabilizer concentration can increase the %EE, but the study revealed that the concentration of stabilizers at ratio (1 drug: 4 stabilizer) was sufficient to give the optimized %EE. This may be due to the presence of optimum stabilizer type and optimum stabilizer concentration (45). Table 5. EE values of the prepared formulas (n=3) Formula code EE% ± SD F1 90.2 ± 0.06 F2 92.4 ± 0.03 F3 92.6 ± 0.04 F4 87.6 ± 0.01 F5 90 ± 0.1 F6 92.3 ± 0.11 F7 86.3 ± 0.1 F8 90.2 ± 0.08 F9 93.5 ± 0.06 F10 89.4 ± 0.005 F11 92.7 ± 0.01 F12 86.4 ± 0.01 F13 93.5 ± 0.17 F14 91.2 ± 0.02 F15 97.5 ± 0.05 Physical stability of AC-NS The prepared formulas were tested for their physical stabilities for one weak at ambient temprature. Formulas F11 and F15 were seemed to be clear after (1 weak) as seen in Table(6). Other formulas look to be precipitated due to increase particle size. The improved stability may be due to the increased thickness of layer of adsorbed polymer when Poloxamer 338, HPMC E5 and PVP K25 were used in combinations, thus preventing the particles from aggregation and/or agglomeration by providing steric hindrance. NS stabilization can be done by electrostatic, steric, or electrostatic modulation (a combination of them) (46). Table 6. Physical stability study for F11 and F15 formulas Measurement time F11 (Particle size in nm) F15 (Particle size in nm) Initial time 43 45 2nd day 50 54 7th day 67 80.2 Characterization of the lyophilized powder SEM The morphological analysis and particle size values of (F11 and F15) in compare to AC row powder were performed by SEM showing nanoparticles with a size of (43 and 45nm) as seen in figure (5). No aggregation of particles could be observed. A B Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 92 C Figure 5. SEM micrograph for pure AC powder at 36.23 KX magnification (A), lyophilized F11 at 78.00 KX magnification (B) and lyophilized F15 at 78.00 KX magnification (C). DSC DSC thermogram of pure AC powder {figure (6-A)} showed a sharp characteristic endothermic peak at (156.30 ºC) that is agreed with references. This gives an indication that the drug has crystalline nature with high purity. The DSC thermograms of the lyophilized formulas (figure (6-F11)) was showed shifting of the peak while figure (6-F15) showed loss of the melting endotherm which may be due to presence of small quantity of aceclofenac. Changing in the peak was reflecting the changing in the crystalline state of aceclofenac to amorphous (47, 48). 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 Temp [C] -20.00 -10.00 mW DSC 113 .23x100COnset 153 .21x100CEnd set 108 .63x100CSta rt 163 .75x100CEnd 128 .75x100CPea k -1.0 3x100J -11 4.78x100J/g Hea t -12 .58x100m WHei ght 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 Temp [C] -10.00 -5.00 mW DSC 39.30x100COnset 60.51x100CEnd set 29.92x100CSta rt 70.32x100CEnd 51.05x100CPea k -21 4.11x100m J -35 .69x100J/g Hea t -4.1 5x100m WHei ght Figure 6. DSC thermograms of pure AC powder, F11 and F15. Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 93 FTIR spectra The characteristics absorption bands of AC were: 3318cm-1 (N–H stretching or O–H stretching), 3277 and 2936 cm-1 (C-H stretching) due to both aromatic and aliphatic stretching vibrations respectively in addition to 1771cm-1(–C=O stretching), 1585 and 1506cm-1 (–C=C stretching of aromatic), and some prominent bands as explained in figure (7). The spectrum of lyophilized powder showed the same characteristic peaks, albeit of smaller intensity as seen in figure (7). The results showed no major differences in the peaks of AC relative to the pure drug in the prepared formulas, suggesting the absence of any interaction between drug and polymers. A broad peak may be attributed to hydrogen bond between drug and polymer (49). Figure 7. FTIR spectra for pure AC powder, F11 and F15. F11 Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 94 PXRD PXRD assays were done for pure drug and the lyophilized formulas as showed in figure (8). The PXRD patterns of AC pure drug showed a sharp diffraction peaks indicating the crystalline nature of the drug as a consequence of different arrangement of the molecules in the crystal lattice. In the lyophilized formulas, lack of distinctive drug peaks or a significant reduction in the characteristic peaks indicating that AC was trapped in an amorphous or molecular shape within the mixture, this is agreed with the results obtained from the DSC assay (50). Figure 8. PXRD graphs for AC powder, F11 and F15 Preparation of hydrogel F15 was selected to be incorporated in hydrogel system. For comparison, blank hydrogel containing unprocessed AC powder was also prepared. Characterization of NS based-hydrogel Physical appearance Visual inspection of the prepared AC-NS based- hydrogel revealing a good homogeneity, free of grittiness and no phase separation. The gel of F15 with carbopol concentration (1%) was appeared to be white in appearance. pH determination The pH values of the prepared AC hydrogels were (6.83 to 6.87) as seen in Table (7). Table 7.Spread-ability and pH values of the prepared aceclofenac hydrogels (n=3) Formula number spreadability (g.cm2/sec)± SD PH ± SD F15 14.3±0.01 6.83±0.02 blank 10.6±0.015 6.87±0.025 Spread-ability measurement The prepared hydrogel was easily spreadable by applying little shear as seen in Table (7). Good spread-ability value is one of the essential properties for gel dosage form. Spread-ability suggests gel propagation capability to a part of the skin. The therapeutic efficiency of gel determined according to spreading value (51, 52). Determination of the viscosity The viscosity was measured at different shear rates and the data are represented in Table (8). It can be seen in (figure-9) that the viscosity of hydrogel of F15 was ranged (180456-11306 cp), while for the blank hydrogel is (168435-10524cp). It was found that as the shear rate increased as the viscosity was decreased. Therefore, it is a non- Newtonian flow behavior (53). The results showed that carbopol was a good gelling agent for preparation of hydrogels. Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 95 Table 8.Viscosity values for the prepared AC hydrogels Speed (rpm) shear rate (1/sec.) Gelled F15 viscosity (cp) Blank hydrogel viscosity (cp) 1.5 0.32 178456 168435 2 0.41 140786 138576 2.5 0.49 99800 95723 3 0.6 83350 80836 6 1.32 60566 58243 12 2.48 48270 46387 30 6.4 24546 27534 60 13.16 13785 10524 Determination of the viscosity The viscosity was measured at different shear rates and the data are represented in Table (8). It can be seen in (figure-9) that the viscosity of hydrogel of F15 was ranged (180456-11306 cp), while for the blank hydrogel is (168435-10524cp). It was found that as the shear rate increased as the viscosity was decreased. Therefore, it is a non- Newtonian flow behavior(53). The results showed that carbopol was a good gelling agent for preparation of hydrogels. Figure 9.Viscosity versus shear rate for gelled F15 and the blank hydrogel. In vitro drug release study In vitro drug release study was done in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Figure (10) showed the release pattern of drug from the prepared hydrogels. At 10 hour period of the release assay, the cumulative percentages of drug release were in the order: gel of F15> plain hydrogel with 84.8% and 32.6% respectively. At 12 hr., the release of gel F15 reached to 100%, while plain hydrogel had the lowest release percentage, as we see there was a significant difference (p<0.05) between F15 hydrogel and plain hydrogel, this is due to improved dissolution rate and permeation due to small size of nanoparticles, i.e. the reduction in particle size leading to increased dissolution velocity. As drug particles are smaller, the corresponding surface area is greater, according to the Noyes-Whitney equation, so the nanocrystals have a significant elevation area. In addition, the diffusion distance decreases for very small particles. The increased surface area and the simultaneous decrease in diffusion distance could therefore significantly increase the velocity of dissolution of the substance (54). Figure 10. The cumulative release of AC for gelled F15 and blank hydrogel The release of AC from hydrogel of F15 is best fit with higher correlation (R2) with zero order equation which show zero order release profile. While the blank hydrogel (R2 = 0.969) fitted with first order kinetics. It is worth mentioning that the diffusional exponent (n) obtained from Korsmeyer- Peppas can be utilized by calculating 60% release of the drug. When the liquid diffusion rate is slower than the relaxation rate of the polymeric chains, the diffusion is Fickian or called case–I transport (n ≤ 0.5). When liquid diffusion rate and polymer relaxation rate are of the same order of magnitude, non-Fickian diffusion or anomalous transport (0.5 < n < 1) is observed. When liquid diffusion rate and polymer relaxation rate are of the same time but diffusion rate more than relaxation rate are, super case – II transport (n > 1.0) is observed. While the relaxation process is very slow compared with the diffusion, the case – II transport occurs (Zero order kinetic model) (29). The value of (n) for hydrogel of F15 (1%) was (0.822) and blank hydrogel was (0.873) that both of them were > 0.5 and < 1 which indicates that the drug release mechanism was non Fickian, and suppose that aceclofenac hydrogel delivered their Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 96 active ingredients by non Fickian diffusion (see Table 9). Table 9. In vitro release kinetics of AC hydrogel formulas Formul a code zero orde r R2 first orde r R2 higuch i R2 kosmeyer -peppas (n) 15 0.974 0.943 0.917 0.822 blank 0.951 0.969 0.88 0.873 Stability test The results of stability test were illustrated in Table (10). The drug content was reduced at elevated temperature and this can be diminish by storage in refrigerator (55). Table 10. Stability tests of gelled F15 (n=3) Stability paramet er 25 ℃ 40 ℃ 4 ℃ appearan ce homogen ous homogen ous homogen ous pH ± SD 6.83±0.02 6.57±0.05 6.62±0.03 Drug content ± SD 97.5±0.05 1 96.43±0.0 15 97.5±0.01 Conclusions AC-NS.s have been successfully prepared using various stabilizers in different stabilizer: drugs ratios (1:1, 2:1, 3:1 and 4:1). The data indicate that the process of solvent/anti-solvent precipitation is an efficient and a cost-effective method for preparing drug NS.s, and easily to implement for the manufacturing of drug nanoparticles. The results confirm that when AC particles are Nano sized, both the solubility and dissolution are improved. AC-NS based hydrogel showed enhanced release rate of drug as compared with blank hydrogel. Acknowledgments I would like to thank College of pharmacy of Basrah and all the staff of the Department of Pharmaceutics, and especially Assistant lecturer Noor Yousif. My deep thanks to Sama Al fayhaa pharmaceutical industry and pioneer pharmaceutical company for their generous supply with some of the needed chemicals. References 1. Savjani KT, Gajjar AK, Savjani JK. Drug Solubility: Importance and Enhancement Techniques. ISRN Pharm. 2012;2012(100 mL):1-10. 2. Mohanraj VJ, Chen Y., Nanoparticles - A review. Trop J Pharm Res. 2007;5(1):561-573. 3. Thorat AA, Dalvi S V. Liquid antisolvent precipitation and stabilization of nanoparticles of poorly water soluble drugs in aqueous suspensions: Recent developments and future perspective. Chem Eng J. 2012;181-182:1-34. 4. Duan H, Wang D, Li Y. Green chemistry for nanoparticle synthesis. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(16):5778-5792. 5. Arslan SA, Tirnaksiz F. A nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug: Aceclofenac. Fabad J Pharm Sci. 2010;35(2):105-118. 6. Ryu JH, Kim J Il, Kim HS, Noh GJ, Lee KT, Chung EK. Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Pelubiprofen and Eperisone Hydrochloride: A Randomized, Open-label, Crossover Study of Healthy Korean Men. Clin Ther. 2017;39(1):138-149.clinthera. 7. Ahmed EM. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. J Adv Res. 2015;6(2):105-121. 8. Factor SJI, Kumar PSSP, Kumar AR, et al. International Journal of Pharmaceuticals and Health care Research. Design, Formulation And In-Vitro Evaluation Of Aceclofenac Fast Disintegrating Tablets Using Natural Polymers. 2019;07(01):23-34. 9. B. S. G. Prasad, V.R.M Gupta, Devanna N, Rama Devi M, G. V. Vardhan Rao and N. Harish. Mixed co-solvency concept. Apromising tool to enhance solubility of poor soluble drug aceclofenac. International Journal Of Pharmaceutical, Chemical And Biological Sciences Ijpcbs 2012, 2(3), 338-342 10. Gajanan V.P., Ram S.P., M.A. Saleem, R.V. Sugave, A.V. Moholkar and M.S. Digge, Enhancement of solubility of aceclofenac by recrystalization method using polar solvent, world journal of pharmaceutical research . 2015, volume 4, issue 5, 2148-2165. 11. Maulvi FA, Dalwadi SJ, Thakkar VT, Soni TG, Gohel MC, Gandhi TR. Improvement of dissolution rate of aceclofenac by solid dispersion technique. Powder Technol. 2011;207(1-3):47-54. 12. Fatimah M.H.W., Ahmed N.A. and Hayder K.A., Preparation and evaluation of ketoprofen nanoparticles. Journal of chemical and pharmaceutical research, 2017,9(12):77-87 13. Jorwekar P, Phatak A, Chaudhari P. Formulation Development of Aceclofenac Loaded Nanosupension by Three Square (3 2) Factorial Design. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotechmology. 2012;4(4):1575-1582. 14. Patel D, Dasgupta S, Dey S, Roja Ramani Y, Ray S, Mazumder B. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC)-based gel for the topical Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 97 delivery of aceclofenac: Preparation, characterization, and in vivo evaluation. Sci Pharm. 2012;80(3):749-764. 15. Soni T, Nagda C, Gandhi T, Chotai NP. Development of discriminating method for dissolution of aceclofenac marketed formulations. Dissolution Technol. 2008;15(2):31-35. 16. Malamatari M, Somavarapu S, Taylor KMG, Buckton G. Solidification of nanosuspensions for the production of solid oral dosage forms and inhalable dry powders. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13(3):435-450. 17. Pattnaik S, Swain K, Rao JV, Varun T, Prusty KB, Subudhi SK. Aceclofenac nanocrystals for improved dissolution: Influence of polymeric stabilizers. RSC Adv. 2015;5(112):91960- 91965. 18. Kishore N, Dhanalekshmi UM, Raja MD, Bhavani S, Reddy PN. Design and In Vitro Evaluation of Solid-Lipid Nanoparticle Drug Delivery for Aceclofenac. J Dispers Sci Technol. 2012;33(1):96-102. 19. Jana S, Sen KK. Chitosan — Locust bean gum interpenetrating polymeric network nanocomposites for delivery of aceclofenac. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;102:878-884. 20. Aman RM, Abu Hashim II, Meshali MM. Novel chitosan-based solid-lipid nanoparticles to enhance the bio-residence of the miraculous phytochemical “Apocynin.” Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;124(September):304-318. 21. Gao L, Zhang D, Chen M. Drug nanocrystals for the formulation of poorly soluble drugs and its application as a potential drug delivery system. J Nanoparticle Res. 2008;10(5):845- 862. 22. Sethuraman N, Shanmuganathan S, Sandhya K, Anbarasan B. Design, development and characterization of nano structured lipid carrier for topical delivery of aceclofenac. Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2018;52(4):581-586. 23. Jana S, Manna S, Nayak AK, Sen KK, Basu SK. Carbopol gel containing chitosan-egg albumin nanoparticles for transdermal aceclofenac delivery. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2014;114:36-44. 24. Umadevi SK, Ravi P, Rao Kusumanchi RM, Muthuprasanna P, Lakshmi PK. The effects of polymers and permeation enhancers on in vitro release of aceclofenac from topical gel formulations. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia. 2008;5(1):237-244. 25. Singh V, Chaubey N. Design and evaluation of topical hydrogel formulation of aceclofenac for improved therapy, Journal of drug delivery and theraputics. 2019; 9(5):118-122. 26. P. Batheja , L. Sheihet , J. Kohn , A. J. Singer , B. Michniak-Kohn. Topical drug delivery by a polymeric nanosphere gel: Formulation optimization and in vitro and in vivo skin distribution studies. Journal of controlled release 149(2011) 159-167 27. Topical and Transdermal Drug Products. Pharmacopeial Forum Vol. 35(3) [May–June 2009 28. Zhang Y, Huo M, Zhou J, et al. DDSolver: An add-in program for modeling and comparison of drug dissolution profiles. AAPS J. 2010;12(3):263-271. 29. Samaha D, Shehayeb R, Kyriacos S. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles of diltiazem modified-release formulations. Dissolution Technol. 2009;16(2):41-46. 30. Guleri TK. Formulation and Evaluation of Topical Gel of Aceclofenac. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2013;3(6):51-53. 31. Anil K, Dilip A, Mahaveer PK, Shankar LS, Surya PS. Design development and evaluation of water dispersable tablet of aceclofenac using synthetic superdisintigrants, Asian Journal of pharmaceutical research and development, 2015:1-8 32. Thiyagarajan A, Thangarasu V. Preparation and Physicochemical Characterization of Solid Dispersion of Aceclofenac Formulated. 2011;8(1):219-224. 33. 33. Srujani. Ch , Sravanthi. B, Madhuri. D. Validated UV Spectrophotometric Methods for the Estimation of Aceclofenac in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Formulation. Sch. Acad. J. Pharm., 2014; 3(6): 471-476. 34. Girish C. Soni , PD Chaudhary , PK Sharma. Solubility Enhancement of Poorly Water Soluble Drug Aceclofenac. Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 2016;3(3);139- 145 35. Maheshwari RK, Indurkhya A. Formulation and evaluation of aceclofenac injection made by mixed hydrotropic solubilization technique. Iran J Pharm Res. 2010;9(3):233-242. 36. Lakshmi P, Kumar GA. Nanosuspension technology: A review. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2010;2(SUPPL. 4):35-40. 37. . TC, . DS, . N, . DS. A Review on Nanosuspensionspromising Drug Delivery Strategy. J Curr Pharma Res. 2012;3(1):764- 776. 38. Keck CM, Müller RH. Drug nanocrystals of poorly soluble drugs produced by high pressure homogenisation. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2006;62(1):3-16. 39. Li X, Xie S, Pan Y, et al. Preparation, characterization and pharmacokinetics of doxycycline hydrochloride and florfenicol polyvinylpyrroliddone microparticle entrapped with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes suspension. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2016;141(February):634-642. Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(2) 2021 Preparation and In vitro characterization of AC Nanosuspension 98 40. Zhang Y, Hu X, Liu X, et al. Dry state microcrystals stabilized by an HPMC film to improve the bioavailability of andrographolide. Int J Pharm. 2015;493(1-2):214-223. 41. Van De Ven H, Paulussen C, Feijens PB, et al. PLGA nanoparticles and nanosuspensions with amphotericin B: Potent in vitro and in vivo alternatives to Fungizone and AmBisome. J Control Release. 2012;161(3):795-803. 42. Ghosh I, Schenck D, Bose S, Ruegger C. Optimization of formulation and process parameters for the production of nanosuspension by wet media milling technique: Effect of Vitamin e TPGS and nanocrystal particle size on oral absorption. Eur J Pharm Sci [Internet]. 2012;47(4):718–28. 43. Li X, Gu L, Xu Y, Wang Y. Preparation of fenofibrate nanosuspension and study of its pharmacokinetic behavior in rats. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2009;35(7):827-833. 44. M. Snehalatha, K Venugopal & Ranendra N. Saha. Etoposide-Loaded PLGA and PCL Nanoparticles I: Preparation and Effect of Formulation Variables. Drug Delivery, 15:5, 267-275 45. Katara R, Majumdar DK. Eudragit RL 100- based nanoparticulate system of aceclofenac for ocular delivery. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2013;103:455-462. 46. Abdelbary AA, Li X, El-Nabarawi M, Elassasy A, Jasti B. Effect of fixed aqueous layer thickness of polymeric stabilizers on zeta potential and stability of aripiprazole nanosuspensions. Pharm Dev Technol. 2013;18(3):730-735. 47. Jawahar N, Nainar Meyyanathan S, Senthil V, Gowthamarajan K, Elango K. Studies on physico-chemical and pharmacokinetic properties of olanzapine through nanosuspension. J Pharm Sci Res. 2013;5(10):196-202. 48. J.S.Choi, J.S.Park. Design of PVP/VAS-630 based tadalafil solid dispersion to enhance the dissolusion rate. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences.S0928- 0987(16)30523-1. 49. Vadher AH, Parikh JR, Parikh RH, Solanki AB. Preparation and characterization of co-grinded mixtures of aceclofenac and neusilin US2 for dissolution enhancement of aceclofenac. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10(2):606-614. 50. Tran PHL, Tran TTD, Lee BJ. Enhanced solubility and modified release of poorly water- soluble drugs via self-assembled gelatin-oleic acid nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2013;455(1- 2):235-240. 51. Prakash K, Narendra C. Development of nano particle encapsulated pemulen gel for aceclofenac topical delivery. African J Pharm Pharmacol. 2016;10(40):854-864. 52. Misal G, Dixit G, Gulkari V. Formulation and evaluation of herbal gel. Indian J Nat Prod Resour. 2012;3(4):501-505. 53. D. J Mastropietro , R. Nimroozi and H. Omidian. Rheology in Pharmaceutical Formulations-A Perspective , J Develop Drugs 2013, 2:2 54. Wei S, Xie J, Luo Y, et al. Hyaluronic acid based nanocrystals hydrogels for enhanced topical delivery of drug: A case study. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;202(July):64-71. 55. Abdel-Rashid RS, Helal DA, Omar MM, El Sisi AM. Nanogel loaded with surfactant based nanovesicles for enhanced ocular delivery of acetazolamide. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:2973-2983. Baghdad Iraqi Journal Pharmaceutical Sciences by bijps is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights© 2015 College of Pharmacy - University of Baghdad. http://bijps.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/bijps.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/