Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(Suppl.) 2021 Rheological investigation of lipid polymer hybrid nano-carriers DOI: https://doi.org/10.31351/vol30issSuppl.pp9-15 9 Rheological Investigation of Lipid Polymer Hybrid Nanocarriers for Oral Delivery of Felodipine (Conference Paper )# Hayder Kadhim Drais*,1 and Ahmed Abbas Hussein** # 9th scientific conference conference sponsored by College of Pharmacy , University of Baghdad 25-26 August 2021 *Ministry of Health and Environment, Babil Health Directorate, Babil, Iraq. **Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. Abstract The rheological behavior among the factors that are present in Stokes law can be used to control the stability of the colloidal dispersion system. Lipid/polymer hybrid nanocarriers (LPHNs) is an interesting colloidal dispersion system that is used for rheological characteristic analysis. The LPHNs are composed of polymeric components and lipids. This research aims to prepare oral felodipine LPHNs to investigate the effect of independent variables which are lipid content, surfactant mixture and distilled water, on the rheological behavior of the nanosystem. A microwave-based technique was successfully used to prepare felodipine LPHNs (H1-H9). The formulations were characterized for particle size and PDI to confirm the colloidal properties of the prepared nanosystem. Therefore, rheological evaluation study of described nanosystems was performed using the coaxial rotational digital rheometer. The outcomes showed that all felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) had a nanosize and homogenous structure which verified the colloidal features of the nanodispersion systems. The rheogram chart indicated that all felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) show pseudoplastic flow (non- Newtonian flow), suggesting a shear-thinning property. The microwave-based method successfully produced felodipine LPHNs with excellent physical texture that proves its ability as a nanoparticles preparation technique. The pseudoplastic flow behavior of felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) suggests that the described nanosystems in this study are physically stable Keywords: Rheology, Felodipine, Lipid-polymer hybrid nanocarriers, Microwave-based method. الفموي لفيلوديبين لاليصالالتحقيق الريولوجي للحامالت النانوية الهجينة للبوليمر الدهني #) بحث مؤتمر ( **احمد عباس حسينو 1*، حيدر كاظم دريس 2021اب 26 – 25جامعة بغداد ، # المؤتمر العلمي التاسع لكلية الصيدلة .وزارة الصحة والبيئة ، دائرة صحة بابل ، بابل ، العراق* العراق.فرع الصيدالنيات ، كلية الصيدلة ، جامعة بغداد ، بغداد ، ** الخالصة الناقالت النانوية . يمكن استخدام السلوك الريولوجي بين العوامل الموجودة في قانون ستوكس للتحكم في استقرار نظام التشتت الغروي LPHNsتتكون . هي نظام تشتت غرواني مثير لالهتمام يستخدم لتحليل الخصائص الريولوجية( LPHNs)الهجينة من البوليمر الشحمي فيلوديبين عن طريق الفم الستقصاء تأثير المتغيرات المستقلة على السلوك LPHNsيهدف هذا البحث إلى إعداد فلوديبين . من مكونات بوليمرية ودهون يف تدخل جميع الصيغ في عملية التوص. بنجاح( LPHNs H1-H9)تم استخدام تقنية الميكروويف لتحضير فلوديبين. الريولوجي للنظام النانوي للتأكد من الخصائص الغروانية للنظام النانوي المحضر ثم استخدام مقياس االنسياب الرقمي الدوراني المحوري لتقييم PDIلحجم الجسيمات و . نانويلها بنية نانوية ومتجانسة تؤكد السمات الغروانية لنظام التشتت ال( LPHNs H1-H9)تظهر النتائج أن جميع تركيبات فلوديبين . االنسيابية الذي له ( التدفق غير النيوتوني)تظهر تدفق البالستيك الكاذب ( (LPHNs H1-H9يشير مخطط الرسم البياني إلى أن جميع تركيبات فلوديبين ًزا ، التي تُظهر نسيًجا فيزيائًيا ممتا( (LPHNs H1-H9تقوم الطريقة المعتمدة على الميكروويف بإعداد تركيبات فلوديبين . خاصية ترقق القص تدفق البالستيك الكاذب الذي يدعم ( LPHNs H1-H9)تُظهر جميع تركيبات الفلوديبين . وهذا يؤكد قدرتها كأسلوب لتحضير الجسيمات النانوية .االستقرار المادي للنظام النانوي .طريقة الميكروويفالريولوجيا ، الفلوديبين ، الناقالت النانوية الهجينة للبوليمر الدهني ، : الكلمات المفتاحية Introduction Rheology is an important physical characteristic in pharmaceutical design and manufacture. Creaming, flocculation, and coalescence are responsible for the instability of the colloidal dispersion system. The rheological behavior among factors that are present in Stokes law can be used to control the stability of the colloidal dispersion system(1). Therefore, the viscosity of colloidal systems is of great importance in scientific pharmaceutical research (1). The coaxial rotational rheometer, also known as Couette or concentric cylinder viscometers, is the most common machine used for measuring viscosity. A circular bob inserted concentrically inside a cup contains the tested colloidal dispersion. The process of measurement occurs when fluid will drag on the bob as a result of bob or cup rotation, and a sensor in the machine will record the viscosity at a specific shear rate and shear stress. 1Corresponding author E-mail: deera2020@gmail.com Received: 22/8/2021 Accepted: 6/10 /2021 Published Online First: 2022-1-11 Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Science https://doi.org/10.31351/vol30issSuppl.pp9-15 Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(Suppl.) 2021 Rheological investigation of lipid polymer hybrid nano-carriers 10 Several readings can be obtained by changing revolutions per minute (RPM). These data can be analyzed to determine the rheological properties of pharmaceutical liquids(2-4).The felodipine lipid/polymer hybrid nanocarriers (LPHNs) is an interesting colloidal dispersion system that is used as an oral drug delivery system for rheological characteristic analysis(5-7). The LPHNs compose of polymeric components and lipid matrices that constitute monolithic type colloidal nanocarriers. The felodipine LPHNs have properties of both polymer nanocarriers and lipid-based nanocarriers constructed from it(8). The polymer content makes felodipine LPHNs provide more control on felodipine release. Whereas, the lipid content enhances felodipine solubility, the biological tissue penetration, and improve absorption in addition to felodipine entrapment efficiency will increase in comparison to lipid based nanoparticles and polymeric nanoparticles alone(9). The process of hybridization between polymer and lipid gives nanoparticles that show: nanoscale particle size, higher drug payload, furiousness, provide sustained drug delivery and more stability in blood circulation and on long term storage of the formulation(10). However, the methods to prepare the LPHNs in these studies were associated with several limitations such as cost, lower stability and time consuming. Recently, a microwave-based method has been used to prepare the LPHNs(11,12). These reports indicated that the microwave-based method have many merits such as rapid processing, can achieve in both small and large scale, inexpensive, more stable, economical, and absence of impurities(11,12). This research aims to prepare oral felodipine LPHNs to investigate the effect of independent variables which are lipid content, distilled water content, and surface-active agents:co- surfactant blend on the rheological behavior of the nanosystem. Materials and Methods Materials The lauric acid, felodipine, polysorbate 80, propylene glycol were purchased from Nanjing Duly Biotech Co., Ltd . China. The PEG laurate was purchased from Beijing Yibai Biotechnology Co., Ltd. China. The cardamom oil was purchased from Hemani international KEPZ, Karachi, Pakistan. Methods Preparation of felodipine LPHNs Nine felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1- H9) were prepared using the microwave-based method that was previously described by Drais H K and Hussein A A(11,12). The hydrophobic mixture was prepared by dissolving chitosan polymer, felodipine, and lauric acid in a blend of cardamom oil and PEG-laurate using a magnetic stirrer device at 1000 rpm for 5 minutes. The hydrophilic mixture that contains distilled water, propylene glycol, and polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate was prepared under a magnetic stirrer at 1000 rpm for 5 minutes. The final mixture that contains hydrophobic and hydrophilic phases according to the concentrations of each ingredient as shown in Table 1, was placed in microwave instrument for less than 15 seconds, then a mixture was subjected to magnetic stirring of 1000 rpm to form solution of the colloidal structure of felodipine LPHNs. The felodipine LPHNs formulations were stored in a tightly closed container at 25 OC temperature until the time of the rheological evaluation (11,12). A coaxial rotational digital rheometer (Biobase Meihua Trading Co., Ltd, China) was used to measure the viscosity of the prepared nanodispersions. The spindle number (1) was used at 25°C. The felodipine LPHNs formulations were exposed to various rotational velocities (0.1, 0.3, 0.6,1.5, 3, 6, 12, 30, and 60 rpm). The experimental data were collected to analyze the rheological properties of the prepared nanosystems(2,11,12). Table 1. The quantitative components of felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) for characterization and optimization Formulation code Felodipine % (w/w) Cardamon oil % (w/w) Lauric acid % (w/w) Chitosan % (w/w) PEG-(400) laurate :Polysorbate 80: Propylene glycol % (w/w) Distilled water % (w/w) up to H1 1 4 1 0.1 15:7.5:7.5 100 H2 1 4 1 0.1 17.5:8.75:8.75 100 H3 1 8 2 0.2 17.5:8.75:8.75 100 H4 1 4 1 0.2 20:10:10 100 H5 1 8 2 0.25 20:10:10 100 H6 1 12 3 0.35 20:10:10 100 H7 1 4 1 0.2 22.5:11.25:11.25 100 H8 1 8 2 0.35 22.5:11.25:11.25 100 H9 1 12 3 0.4 22.5:11.25:11.25 100 Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(Suppl.) 2021 Rheological investigation of lipid polymer hybrid nano-carriers 11 Characterization of the felodipine LPHNs 1. Measurement of particle size The particle size was determined by the nanoparticle analyzer model SZ-100 - nanopartica series instruments (Horiba scientific company, Japan). Photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) is a technique that has been used to determine the globular size of the nanosystem. The experiments were performed in triplicate (13,14). 2. Measurement of polydispersity index (PDI) PDI is the uniformity parameter. PDI of the prepared nanosystems was measured by the DLS (dynamic light scattering) technique. PCS is a technique that has been used to determine PDI. The higher the PDI value indicates the lower particle size uniformity. The measurement was performed in three trials(13-15). 3. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) The morphological attributes of felodipine LPHNs formulation can explain by AFM angstrom advanced inc. AA3000 USA. The AFM measurement was performed by using 1-3 drops of the felodipine LPHNs formulation onto a glass slide(13). Statistical analysis The investigation data was presented as the average of three trials and ± SD (n=3). The Microsoft Office Excel program was used to analyze the data. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used where the level at (P<0.05) was kept as significant while the level (P<0.05) was kept as not significant(16). Results and Discussion Particle size and PDI of felodipine LPHNs The felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1- H9) were successfully prepared by the microwave- based technique according to specified component concentrations as shown in Table 1. All formulations were visually clear indicating colloidal properties of the hybrid dispersion system. The results of DLS revealed that the mean particle sizes of the felodipine LPHNs formulations were H1 (87 nm), H2 (70nm), H3 (146 nm), H4 (33 nm), H5 (94 nm), H6 (978 nm), H7 (49 nm), H8 (75 nm) and H9 (809nm).The outcomes show that all felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) had nanosize and ascertain colloidal features of the nanodispersion system(17). According to the results, the analysis of variance show null hypothesis refusion that state the correlation between variables of investigation is no significant and accept the alternative hypothesis that state there is a significant correlation between variables of investigation (17). Therefore, there is a significant relationship between surface-active agents: co-surfactant mixture, fat content, and distilled water as independent variables and particle size at level (p<0.05)(17). The outcomes of the characterization process for PDI as shown in Table 2, were from 0.314 to 0.729. The PDI outcome indicated that felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1- H9) are the homogenous structure that ascertains the stability of felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) against physical instability processes of the dispersion system(17). The ANOVA shows a significant correlation between independent variables and PDI at level (p<0.05) (17). Table 2. The particle size and PDI results of felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) Code H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 Globule size (nm)* 87.6± 2.26 70.1± 3.38 146.2± 10.095 33.3± 1.216 94.21± 1.587 978.4± 3.004 49.6± 0.953 75± 2.816 809± 2.26 PDI* 0.538± 0.003 0.401± 0.001 0.547± 0.050 0.314± 0.002 0.54± 0.078 0.729± 0.011 0.374± 0.003 0.335± 0.005 0.798± 0.002 *Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n=3). Rheological study The rheological experiment was performed successfully at different rotational velocities and rheological data were collected which are viscosity, rate of shear, and shear stress. The rheogram chart is obtained by the plot of the rate of shear against shear stress as shown in Figure 1. The rheogram chart indicates that all of the felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) show pseudoplastic flow (non-Newtonian flow) that have shear-thinning property. The pseudoplastic rheological flow improves the stability of felodipine LPHNs formulations against creaming, flocculation, and coalescence which are responsible for the instability of hybrid dispersion system. Pseudoplastic flow behavior reduces the aggregation and settling rates of nanoparticles during a long period of pharmaceutical formulation storage also provide dose uniformity(1). The felodipine LPHNs formulation (H4) was the selected formula due to has lower particle size and PDI in addition to pseudoplastic flow, in comparison with other present formulations. The AFM provides information for the size and shape of nanocarriers and apply for the felodipine LPHNs formulation (H4). The outcomes show that the morphology of https://www.horiba.com/uk/scientific/products/particle-characterization/particle-size-analysis/details/sz-100-7245/ https://www.horiba.com/uk/scientific/products/particle-characterization/particle-size-analysis/details/sz-100-7245/ Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(Suppl.) 2021 Rheological investigation of lipid polymer hybrid nano-carriers 12 felodipine LPHNs (H4) was approached to spherical appearance with a smooth surface as shown in Figure 2, this ascertain the colloidal attributes of optimized felodipine LPHNs formulation (H4) . Figure 1. Shear stress against the shear rate of felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9). Figure 2. The AFM 3D image of felodipine LPHNs (H4) where the scanning area is 78 nm * 78 nm Table 3. The shear stress results at different shear rates of felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) Shear stress* Shear rate H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 0.0529 506± 0.177 601± 0.645 659± 0.473 521± 0.408 544± 0.296 576± 0.433 506± 0.257 514± 0.295 574± 0.492 0.158 755± 0.961 780± 1.214 810± 0.9 702± 0.816 854± 0.79 877± 1.77 755± 1.237 737± 0.711 789± 0.869 0.317 882± 1.565 933± 1.865 987± 4.972 989± 3.232 1121± 1.731 1178± 3.612 814± 2.215 930± 5.058 987± 1.771 0.793 995± 3.636 1002± 2.776 1046± 8.305 1240± 4.36 1377± 4.43 1386± 5.96 1057± 13.32 1289± 4.017 1320± 5.426 1.587 1205± 8.859 1257± 6.82 1302± 18.39 1499± 8.035 1569± 12.791 1601± 10.865 1347± 13.051 1632± 12.155 1703± 16.322 3.174 1511± 8.22 1634± 25.887 1704± 14.6 1703± 17.986 1820± 18.144 1873± 31.697 1770± 21.542 1877± 22.405 1966± 13.117 6.348 1804± 37.725 2166± 71.064 2369± 37.521 2030± 33.856 2120± 33.737 2389± 34.94 2303± 39.973 2602± 32.793 2698± 35.241 15.871 2703± 102.66 2789± 45.1 2810± 97.328 2987± 118.47 2870± 225.14 2850± 148.59 2945± 77.03 2866± 217.86 2975± 99.141 31.742 3001± 117.80 3020± 124.694 3040± 158.99 3095± 69.18 3012± 82.2 3044± 153.50 3058± 120.10 3055± 107.05 3081± 80.744 *Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n=3). Table 4. The viscosity results at different shear rates of felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) Viscosity* Shear rate H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 0.0529 8733.45 ±3.347 11361.05 ±12.202 12457.46 ±8.947 9678.63 ±7.722 10283.55 ±5.595 10888.46 ±8.203 9565.21 ±4.863 9716.44 ±5.587 10850.6 6±9.303 0.158 4500 ±6.082 4936.7 ±7.692 5126.58 ±5.699 4443.03 ±5.17 5405.06 ±5 5550.63 ±11.212 4778.48 ±7.831 4664.55 ±4.5 4993.67 ±5.505 0.317 2782.33 ±4.936 2943.21 ±5.883 3113.56 ±15.6851 3119.87 ±10.195 3536.27 ±5.462 3716.08 ±11.397 2567.82 ±6.989 2933.75 ±15.958 3113.56 ±5.587 *Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n=3). Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(Suppl.) 2021 Rheological investigation of lipid polymer hybrid nano-carriers 13 Continued table 4. Viscosity* Shear rate H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 0.793 1254.72 ±4.586 1263.55 ±3.501 1319.04 ±10.473 1563.68± 5.497 1736.44 ±5.587 1747.79 ±7.516 1332.91± 16.797 1625.47 ±5.065 1664.56 ±6.842 1.587 759.29 ±5.582 792.06 ±4.297 820.41 ±11.588 944.54 ±5.063 988.65 ±8.06 1008.82 ±6.846 848.77 ±8.224 1028.35 ±7.659 1073.09 ±10.285 3.174 476.05± 2.589 514.8±8 .155 536.86± 4.599 536.54±5 .666 573.4±5. 716 590.1±9 .986 557.65±6 .787 591.36± 7.058 619.4±4 .132 6.348 284.18± 5.942 341.2±1 1.194 373.18± 5.91 319.78±5 .333 333.96±5 .314 376.33± 5.504 362.79±6 .297 409.89± 5.165 425.01± 5.551 15.871 170.31± 6.469 175.72± 2.841 177.05± 6.132 188.2±7. 464 180.83±1 4.186 179.57± 9.362 185.55±4 .853 180.58± 13.726 187.44± 6.246 31.742 94.54±3 .711 95.14±2 .408 95.77± 5.008 97.5± 2.179 94.89± 2.589 95.89± 4.835 96.33± 3.783 96.244± 3.372 97.06± 2.543 *Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n=3). 1. Effect of lipid content on the viscosity of felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) It was found that the viscosity will increase as the concentration of lipid content (cardamom oil: lauric acid) increases at a constant concentration of PEG laurate: polysorbate 80: propylene glycol. The viscosity values have the following ascending order for H7 < H8 < H9 at 5%(w/w) of lipid content; up to 50%(w/w) of distilled water for H7, 10%(w/w) of lipid content, up to 45%(w/w) of distilled water for H8 and 15%(w/w) of lipid content, up to 40%(w/w) of distilled water for H9, at constant concentration of surface-active agents:co-surfactant blend which is 22.5%(w/w) of PEG-laurate and 11.25%(w/w) polysorbate 80 and 11.25%(w/w) of propylene glycol. The viscosity values have the following ascending order for H4 < H5 < H6 at 5%(w/w) of lipid content, up to 55%(w/w) of distilled water for H4, 10%(w/w) of lipid content, up to 50%(w/w) of distilled water for H5 and 15%(w/w) of lipid content, up to 45%(w/w) of distilled water for H6 , at constant concentration of surface-active agents:co-surfactant blend which is 20% (w/w) of PEG-laurate and 10%(w/w) polysorbate 80 and 10%(w/w) of propylene glycol. The viscosity values have the following ascending order for H2 < H3 at 5%(w/w) of lipid content, up to 60%(w/w) of distilled water for H2 and 10%(w/w) of lipid content; up to 55%(w/w) of distilled water for H3, at a constant concentration of surface-active agents:co-surfactant blend which is 17.5%(w/w) of PEG-laurate and 8.75%(w/w) polysorbate 80 and 8.75%(w/w) of propylene glycol. The H1 shows lower viscosity in comparison to other formulations due to low volume concentration of lipid content 5%(w/w) and higher concentration of continuous phase 65%(w/w) at lower concentration of surface-active agents:co- surfactant blend which is 15%(w/w) of PEG-laurate and 7.5%(w/w) polysorbate 80 and 7.5%(w/w) of propylene glycol. The increment in lipid content concentration which is cardamom oil: lauric acid (4:1) increases the viscosity of felodipine LPHNs formulations at a constant concentration of surface- active agents:co-surfactant blend is due to increase in volume concentration of nanocarriers that make colloidal dispersion system more resistant to flow and give pseudoplastic system(1,18).The analysis of variance indicates a significant correlation between the lipid content and viscosity at level p > (0.05). 2. Effect of distilled water content on the viscosity of felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) The distilled water constitutes the continuous or external phase of the colloidal dispersion systems (H1-H9). It was found that the viscosity will decrease as the distilled water increases at a constant concentration of PEG laurate: polysorbate 80: propylene glycol. The viscosity values have the following descending order for H9 < H8 < H7 at 15%(w/w) of lipid content, up to 40%(w/w) of distilled water for H9, 10%(w/w) of lipid content, up to 45%(w/w) of distilled water for H8 and 5%(w/w) of lipid content, up to 50%(w/w) of distilled water for H7 , at constant concentration of surface-active agents:co-surfactant blend which is 22.5%(w/w) of PEG-laurate and 11.25%(w/w) polysorbate 80 and 11.25%(w/w) of propylene glycol. Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(Suppl.) 2021 Rheological investigation of lipid polymer hybrid nano-carriers 14 The viscosity values have the following descending order for H6 < H5 < H4 at15%(w/w) of lipid content; upto 45%(w/w) of distilled water for H6, 10%(w/w) of lipid content; upto 50%(w/w) of distilled water for H5 and 5%(w/w) of lipid content; upto 55%(w/w) of distilled water for H4 , at constant concentration of surface-active agents:co-surfactant blend which is 20% (w/w) of PEG-laurate and 10%(w/w) polysorbate 80 and 10%(w/w) of propylene glycol. The viscosity values have the following descending order for H3 < H2 at 10%(w/w) of lipid content; upto 55%(w/w) of distilled water for H3 and 5%(w/w) of lipid content; upto 60%(w/w) of distilled water for H2, at a constant concentration of surface-active agents:co- surfactant blend which is 17.5%(w/w) of PEG- laurate and 8.75%(w/w) polysorbate 80 and 8.75%(w/w) of propylene glycol. The H1 shows lower viscosity in comparison with other formulations due to low volume concentration of lipid content 5%(w/w) and higher concentration of continuous phase 65%(w/w) at lower concentration of surface-active agents:co- surfactant blend which is 15%(w/w) of PEG-laurate and 7.5%(w/w) polysorbate 80 and 7.5%(w/w) of propylene glycol. The reason for increment in viscosity as distilled water decrease is due to reducing the continuous phase volume that makes felodipine LPHNs closer to each other that are stabilized by steric forces due to the presence of the outer coat of PEG(1,18). The analysis of variance indicates a significant correlation between the continuous phase and viscosity at level p > (0.05). 3. Effect of surface-active agents:co-surfactant blend on the viscosity of felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) The surface-active agents:co-surfactant blend represent by PEG-laurate, polysorbate 80 and propylene glycol. It was found that the viscosity will increase as the concentration of surface-active agents:co-surfactant blend increases at a constant concentration of lipid content. The viscosity values have the following ascending order for H1 < H2 < H4< H7 at 15%(w/w):7.5%(w/w): 7.5%(w/w) of PEG-laurate:polysorbate 80 : propylene glycol respectively, upto 65%(w/w) of distilled water for H1. 17.5%(w/w):8.75%(w/w): 8.75%%(w/w) of PEG-laurate:polysorbate 80 : propylene glycol respectively, upto 60%(w/w) of distilled water for H2, 20%(w/w):10%(w/w): 10%(w/w) of PEG- laurate:polysorbate 80 : propylene glycol respectively, upto 55%(w/w) of distilled water for H4. 22.5%(w/w):11.25%(w/w): 11.25%(w/w) of PEG-laurate:polysorbate 80 : propylene glycol respectively, upto 50%(w/w) of distilled water for H4, at a constant concentration of lipid content which is 5%(w/w). The viscosity values have the following ascending order for H3 < H5 < H8 at 17.5%(w/w):8.75%(w/w): 8.75%%(w/w) of PEG-laurate:polysorbate 80 : propylene glycol respectively, upto 55%(w/w) of distilled water for H3, 20%(w/w):10%(w/w): 10%(w/w) of PEG- laurate:polysorbate 80 : propylene glycol respectively, upto 50%(w/w) of distilled water for H5. 22.5%(w/w):11.25%(w/w): 11.25%(w/w) of PEG-laurate:polysorbate 80 : propylene glycol respectively, upto 45%(w/w) of distilled water for H8, at a constant concentration of lipid content which is 10%(w/w). The viscosity values have the following ascending order for H6 < H9 at 20%(w/w):10%(w/w): 10%(w/w) of PEG- laurate:polysorbate 80 : propylene glycol respectively , upto 45%(w/w) of distilled water for H6, 22.5%(w/w):11.25%(w/w): 11.25%(w/w) of PEG-laurate:polysorbate 80 : propylene glycol respectively, upto 40%(w/w) of distilled water for H8, at a constant concentration of lipid content which is 15%(w/w). The increment in surface-active agents:co-surfactant blend concentration increases the viscosity of felodipine LPHNs formulations(H1- H9) at a constant lipid concentration is due to increase in volume concentration of nanoparticles that create dispersion medium more resistant to flow and improve medium viscosity(1,18). The analysis of variance indicates a significant correlation between the continuous phase and viscosity at level p > (0.05). Conclusion The microwave-based method was successful in producing the felodipine LPHNs (H1- H9) that show an excellent physical texture to reflect colloidal features of the hybrid nanosystem that make it the most advanced method for the preparation of nanoparticles. Rheological attributes are the main physical characteristics in the pharmaceutical liquid dosage form. From precise viscosity analysis, the type of flow can be determined. The rheogram chart indicates that all of the felodipine LPHNs formulations (H1-H9) show pseudoplastic flow. The pseudoplastic rheological flow enhances the felodipine LPHNs formulation's stability against physical instability and provides felodipine dose uniformity. Ethical Approval The present work does not include the use of human or animal subjects. Conflict of Interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. Funding None. Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.30(Suppl.) 2021 Rheological investigation of lipid polymer hybrid nano-carriers 15 References 1. Sinko P J, Martin A N. Martin's physical pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences: Physical-chemical and biopharmaceutical principles in the pharmaceutical sciences. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006. 2. The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) 30, NF 25: The United States Pharmacopeial. Convention Inc USA; 2006. 3. Abbas, K., Abdulkarim, S., Saleh, A.M., & Ebrahimian, M.. Suitability of viscosity measurement methods for liquid food variety and applicability in the food industry - A review. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment. 2010;8: 100-107. 4. Dutta D, Dutta A, Raychaudhuri U, Chakraborty U. Rheological characteristics and thermal degradation kinetics of beta-carotene in pumpkin puree. Journal of Food Engineering. 2006;76:538–546. 5. Siddartha Venkata Talluri, Gowthamarajan Kuppusamy, Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Reddy Karri, Shashank Tummala, Subba Rao V Madhunapantula. Lipid-based nanocarriers for breast cancer treatment – a comprehensive review.Drug Delivery 2016; 23(4):1291-1305. 6. Westesen K, Siekmann B. Biodegradable colloidal drug carrier systems based on solid lipids. Drugs Pharmaceut Sci. 1996; 73:213–258. 7. Yaghmur A, Glatter O.Characterization and potential applications of nanostructured aqueous dispersions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;147:333–342. 8. Cheow WS, Hadinoto K. Factors affecting drug encapsulation and stability of lipid–polymer hybrid nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2011; 85: 214–20. 9. Wu X Y. Strategies for optimizing polymer– lipid hybrid nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2016; 5: 609– 612. 10. Hadinoto K, Sundaresan A, Cheow WS. Lipid– polymer hybrid nanoparticles as a new generation therapeutic delivery platform: a review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013; 85:427– 43. 11. Drais H K, Hussein A A. Design and Preparation Lipid/polymer Hybrid Nanocarrier as Pulmonary Dispersion System Using a Novel Microwave Method. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14:1233-7. 12. Drais Hayder Kadhim and Hussein Ahmed Abbas.Formulation and evaluation of lipid/polymer hybrid nanocarriers using a new innovative microwaves-based method. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2020;12 (4):1264-1269. 13. Dave V, Tak Kajal, Sohgaura Amit Gupta, Ashish Sadhu, Veera Reddy Kakarla. Lipid- polymer hybrid nanoparticles: Synthesis strategies and biomedical applications. Journal of Microbiological Methods 2019;160:130-42. 14. Tahir N, Madni A, Balasubramanian V, Rehman M, Correia A, Kashif PM, Mäkilä E, Salonen J, Santos HA. Development and optimization of methotrexate-loaded lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery applications. Int J Pharm. 2017 Nov 25;533(1):156-168. 15. Drais H K, and Hussein A A. Formulation and characterization of carvedilol nanoemulsion oral liquid dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015; 7 (12): 209-16. 16. Z Aigner, HB Hassan, O Berkesi, M Kata, I Eros. Thermoanalytical, FTIR, and X-ray studies of gemfibrozil-cyclodextrin complexes. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2005; 81(2): 267-72. 17. Danaei M, Dehghankhold M, Ataei S, et al. Impact of particle size and polydispersity index on the clinical applications of lipidic nanocarrier systems. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10(57):1-17. 18. Juntarasakul O, Maneeintr K. Evaluation of stability and viscosity measurement of emulsion from oil from production in the northern oilfield in Thailand. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018; 140:1-6. Baghdad Iraqi Journal Pharmaceutical Sciences by bijps is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights© 2015 College of Pharmacy - University of Baghdad. http://bijps.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/bijps.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/