Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.32( 1 ) 2023                       The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31351/vol32iss1pp245-256 

245 
 

Evaluating the Benefits of Using Mobile Application (diarrhea 

management step by step) in the Management of Diarrhea by Community 

Pharmacists 
 

**Hadi Mohammed Ali and *Hamadani-Al Yaqoob Fadya ,*,1Mikhael Mudher Ehab 
 

Iraq. Baghdad, Baghdad, of University Pharmacy, of College Pharmacy, Clinical of Department * 

Iraq. Basra, Basra, of University Pharmacy, of College Pharmacy, Clinical of epartmentD ** 
 

Abstract 
Diarrhea is a common problem that leads patients to seek a pharmacist's advice. It is associated with 

significant morbidity and mortality. The majority of pharmacists in Iraq did not manage diarrheal cases properly. 

Therefore, the current study aimed to evaluate the benefit of a new mobile application (diarrhea management step 

by step) to improve the pharmacist's role in managing diarrhea. The study was conducted from 21st September to 

21st October 2021 using a pre-post design via a simulated patient (SP) technique. A validated diarrhea scenario 

was presented to each pharmacist by the SP twice, the first time before and the other after giving the mobile 

application to the pharmacist. Furthermore, pharmacists were asked to rate the application regarding its ease of 

use, reducing the time needed for managing diarrhea cases, reducing diagnostic errors, reducing medication errors, 

and applicability in daily clinical practice. The study sample involved 50 community pharmacists; only 47 

completed the study. After using the application, all questions necessary to assess diarrhea were significantly 

improved. Moreover, the average number of questions asked to the SP was significantly increased. On the other 

hand, providing the SP with an appropriate non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment was also 

significantly improved. Additionally, counseling the SP about the dispensed medication was also improved. Most 

participating pharmacists agreed with the application's ease of use, ability to reduce diagnosis and medication 

errors, and applicability in clinical practice. In conclusion, the tested application effectively improves the 

pharmacist's role in the assessment and management of diarrhea. 
Keywords: Mobile application, Diarrhea, Pharmacist's role, Iraq 

 

تطبيق الهاتف النقال )عالج االسهال خطوة بخطوة( في عالج االسهال بواسطة  تقييم فوائد استعمال 

 صيادلة المجتمع 
 **علي محمد هادي و  *، فادية يعقوب الحمداني 1*،ايهاب مضر ميخائيل

 العراق ، بغداد    ، جامعة بغداد   ،   كلية الصيدلة ، السريرية    فرع الصيدلة*
 العراق   ، البصرة ، جامعة البصرة   ،   كلية الصيدلة  الصيدلة السريرية، فرع **

 الخالصة
  ذلك   ومع  والوفيات.  المراضة  حدوث  بزيادة  االسهال  يرتبط  الصيدلي.  باستشارة  يقوم  المريض  تجعل  التي  األسباب  اكثر  من  هو  االسهال

  المحمول   الهاتف  تطبيق  فائدة  تقييم  إلى  تهدف  الحالية  الدراسة  فإن  ،   لذلك  سليم.  بشكل  اإلسهال  حاالت  يعالجوا  لم  العراق  في  الصيادلة  غالبية  فإن  ، 

  أكتوبر  21 إلى سبتمبر 21 من  الفترة في  الدراسة أجريت اإلسهال. حاالت عالج في الصيدلي دور تحسين في بخطوة( خطوة اإلسهال )إدارة الجديد

 المريض  قبل  من  صيدلي  لكل  صحته(  من  التحقق  )تم  لإلسهال  سيناريو  عرض  تم  الوهمي.  المريض  تقنية  عبر  بعد(-)قبل  تصميم  باستخدام  2021

  حيث   من  التطبيق  تقييم  الصيادلة  من  ُطلب  ذلك،   على  عالوة  للصيدلي.  المحمول  الهاتف  تطبيق  إعطاء  بعد  والثانية  قبل  االولى  المرة  مرتين،   الوهمي

  في   التطبيق  إستخدام  وإمكانية  األدوية،   أخطاء  وتقليل  التشخيصية،   األخطاء   وتقليل  اإلسهال،   حاالت  لعالج  الالزم  الوقت  وتقليل  استخدامه،   سهولة

  جميع  تحسنت  التطبيق،  استخدام  بعد  فقط.   صيدالنيا  47  الدراسة   أكمل  ذلك،  ومع  صيدلي.  50  الدراسة  عينة  تضمنت   اليومي.  العمل  أثناء  الصيدلية 

 من  كبير.  بشكل  الوهمي  المريض  على  طرحها  تم  التي  األسئلة  عدد  متوسط  زيادة  تم  ،   ذلك  على  عالوة  ملحوظ.  بشكل  اإلسهال  لتقييم  الالزمة  األسئلة

  اعطائها   تم  التي  المعلومات  زادت  ذلك،   إلى  باإلضافة  كبير.  بشكل  تحسن  المناسب  والدوائي  الدوائي  غير  بالعالج  الوهمي  المريض  تزويد  أخرى،   ناحية

  التشخيص   تحسين  على  وقدرته  ،   التطبيق  استخدام   سهولة  على  وبشدة   وافقوا  المشاركين  الصيادلة  معظم  صرفها.  تم  التي  األدوية  عن  الوهمي  للمريض

  دور  لتحسين  فعال  اختباره  تم  الذي  التطبيق  إن  ذلك،   من  نستنج  اليومية.  السريرية  الممارسة  في  لالستخدام  تطبيقه  وإمكانية  الدوائية،   األخطاء  وتقليل

 اإلسهال.  وعالج تقييم في الصيدلي
 تطبيق للهاتف النقال . االسهال. دور الصيدلي. العراق. :  المفتاحية الكلمات

 
 

Introduction 
A community pharmacist is an expert who 

dispenses medications, counsels patients, and 

manages their care plan (1). Common reasons for 

contacting a pharmacist by Iraqi patients include 

purchasing a medication and/or seeking medical 

advice about a medication or a minor ailment (2,3), 

which can be defined as "common but self-limiting 

or uncomplicated conditions which can be 

diagnosed and managed with over-the-counter 

medications and without complicated medical 

interventions" (4). 

1Corresponding author E-mail: ehab_pharma84@yahoo.com 

Received: 1/5 /2022  

Accepted: 3/7 /2022 

Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Science 

https://doi.org/10.31351/vol32iss1pp245-256


Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.31(2) 2022               The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

246 

 

Diarrhea is one of the most commonly 

encountered minor ailments in the community 

pharmacies of the developed and developing 

countries (5-7). Although most cases of diarrhea are 

self-limited (8), it can be associated with significant 

morbidity and mortality in all age ranges, especially 

for children <5 years of age (9). According to the 

WHO report, diarrhea is one of the top 10 causes of 

death globally with more than 1.3 million deaths in 

2015 (10). However, the mortality rate of diarrhea 

was greater in developing countries like Iraq as 

compared to developed countries (5). The main 

reason for diarrhea associated mortality was related 

to its risk in causing dehydration and electrolyte 

imbalance, which if left without treatment can 

progress to acidosis and circulatory collapse that 

associated with impaired perfusion of vital organs, 

leading to renal damage and eventually death (11). 

Unfortunately, many studies that were conducted in 

Iraq found that the majority of pharmacists did not 

manage (assess and/or treat) diarrheal cases in a 

proper way. The main reason for such problem was 

the lack of sufficient knowledge in management of 

diarrhea and other minor ailments (12, 13). Some 

studies found that the use of new technologies such 

as computers (14) and smart mobiles (15) can assist 

pharmacists and improve their work efficiency and 

productivity (16). Therefore, the current study aimed 

to evaluate the benefit of newly developed mobile 

application to improve pharmacist's role in the 

management of diarrhea in a community pharmacy 

setting. 
 

Methods 
Study design 

A pre-post experimental study design was 

used to assess the benefits of using a mobile 

application (diarrhea management step by step- 

freely available on Google play store) (17) to improve 

the community pharmacist's role in diagnosis and 

treatment of diarrhea cases. This assessment was 

performed through a simulated patient (SP) 

approach (18). A well-developed and validated 

scenario about diarrhea for an elderly patient with 

hypertension and prostatic hyperplasia was 

presented to each pharmacist by the simulated 

patient (SP) twice, the first time before giving the 

mobile application to the pharmacist and the second 

time after providing pharmacists with the 

application and training them on it. In other words, 

the first assessment visit was used to assess the 

pharmacist's role in the management of diarrhea, 

while the second assessment visit was used to 

evaluate the benefit of using the application on the 

pharmacist's ability to manage diarrhea. Each 

pharmacist was trained by the researcher about the 

use of the application and its features. 

In the first assessment visit, the SP did not 

enter the pharmacy until it is free from customers to 

minimize the possibility of incomplete assessment 

of the patient case by the busy pharmacist. 

Thereafter, the SP presented his case (scenario) to 

the pharmacist and responded to any queries raised 

by the pharmacist. To ensure concealment of the 

assessment process, the SP bought all dispensed 

medications, without regard to their suitability to 

manage the case. After the end of the 1st assessment 

visit by 1-3 days, the application and a brief 

demonstrating video were shared with the 

pharmacist using Bluetooth technology. After 

providing the pharmacist with the application and 

training on it using different diarrhea cases, an 

assessment of the pharmacist's role in diagnosis and 

management of diarrhea was performed by 

presenting a scenario similar to that in the first visit 

to the pharmacist. In the second assessment visit 

some measures were followed to maximize 

concealment of the assessment process and ensure 

dealing of the pharmacist with the case in a realistic 

way. The first measure was presenting the scenario 

by a new SP that did not enter the pharmacy in the 

first visit. The second measure was scheduling the 

second visit within 7-10 days after the first visit to 

ascertain that the pharmacist forgets the details of 

the case, and thus reducing the chance of bias in 

using the application through guessing the case and 

the SP by the pharmacist. At the end of the second 

assessment visit, each pharmacist was thanked for 

participation in the study. Additionally, some 

information was obtained from the participating 

pharmacist including age, gender, years of 

experience, academic degree, college that he/she 

graduated from. Furthermore, the pharmacist was 

asked to rate the application in regard to 5 different 

points (ease of use, reducing the time needed for 

management of diarrhea cases, reducing diagnostic 

errors, reducing medication errors, applicability in 

daily clinical practice) using numerical scale from 0 

to 10.  

In both assessment visits, the interview 

with the pharmacist was recorded by the SP mobile 

phone to facilitate documentation of all details. All 

records were analyzed by the main researcher to 

assess and document the role of the pharmacist in 

diagnosis and management of diarrhea in both visits 

using specially designed checklists. The study was 

ethically approved by the ethical committee at 

College of Pharmacy /University of Baghdad. 

The simulated patients 

Students from the College of Pharmacy – 

University of Baghdad worked as the SP after being 

trained about the diarrhea scenario by the main 

researcher. Despite the fact that two SPs were 

sufficient for conducting the present study, three 

students were enrolled as SP in this study. The third 

student intended for emergency cases in which one 

of the SPs was known or detected by the pharmacist. 

To ensure maximum concealment of the emergency 

SP, the student was trained to ask the pharmacist 

about a suitable treatment for his acne, and then 

present the diarrhea scenario. 



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.31(2) 2022               The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

247 

 

Study sample 

Pharmacists who work in community 

pharmacies in Baghdad and having android phone 

were eligible for participation in the current study.  

To ensure recruiting a large sample, pharmacists 

were informed about the developed application and 

its unique features, besides the study purpose and 

procedure through an advertisement in two facebook 

pages (Al-Multaqa Alsaidalani and Multaqa Al-

Shaheed Muhand Kamil for pharmacists) with the 

largest number of pharmacist members. In the 

advertisement, pharmacists who were interested in 

the idea of the application and accepted to 

participate in the study (informed consent) were 

requested to fill in a Google form. The google form 

was opened for 1 week from 8th September to 15th 

September 2021. 314 responses were obtained in 

that period. All responses were analyzed by the main 

researcher to check eligibility of pharmacist for the 

current study; meanwhile only 30 pharmacists were 

eligible (Figure 1). To increase the sample, an 

additional convenient sample of 30 pharmacists 

were contacted in their pharmacies (in Al-Karkh 

discrete region, Baghdad) and informed about the 

study. Only 20 pharmacists provided their informed 

consent to participate. Thus, the total sample of the 

current study was 50 pharmacists.

 
Figure 1. The study sample 
 

Statistical analysis 

Data input and analysis was done using 

statistical package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 

version 17. Categorical variables were presented as 

number and frequencies while continuous variables 

were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Chi 

square test was used to test the significance in the 

difference among non-paired categorical variables.  

 

McNemar test was used to test the significance in the 

difference among paired categorical variables. 

Shapiro wilk test was used to test the normality of 

continuous variables. Within each group paired T 

test was used to the difference in mean for normally 

distributed continuous variables, while Wilcoxon 

Sign test was used for abnormally distributed data. 

Between groups, independent T test was used to the 

measure difference in mean for normally distributed 



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.31(2) 2022               The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

248 

 

continuous variables, while Mann Whitney U test 

was used for abnormally distributed data. Pearson 

correlation test was used to measure the correlation 

between normally distributed continuous data. On 

the other hand, Spearman rho correlation test was 

used to measure the correlation between abnormally 

distributed continuous data. P values less than 0.05 

was considered significant. 

Results 
Demographic data of the participated pharmacists 

Fifty pharmacists were included in this 

study; however, two participants were withdrawn 

from the study and the application was not working 

on the smartphone of one participant. Therefore, the 

sample size of the study was 47. However, only 27 

pharmacists were found to use the application, and 

20 did not use the application during the 2nd 

assessment visit. Most participants graduated from 

Iraqi public universities in the last 5 years & hold 

BSc. degree in pharmaceutical sciences. Study 

participants' average working experience in 

community pharmacies was 7.14 years (Table 1). 
 

Table 1. Characteristics of the participated pharmacists 
 

Parameter Participants who 

used the 

application 

(n=27) 

Participants who 

did not use the 

application (n=20) 

P 

value 

All participants 

(n=47) 

Gender Male 

Female 

15 (55.56%) 

12 (44.44%) 

10 (50%) 

10 (50%) 

0.706* 25 (53.19%) 

22 (46.81%) 

Graduation 

college 

 

Public Iraqi 

University 

Private Iraqi 

University 

International 

Universities 

18 (66.67%) 

3 (11.11%) 

6 (22.22%) 

12 (60%) 

4 (20%) 

4 (20%) 

0.699* 30 (63.83%) 

7 (14.89%) 

10 (21.28%) 

Graduation 

year 

 

1980-2000 

2001-2010 

2011-2015 

2016-2021 

1 (3.7%) 

7 (25.93%) 

3 (11.11%) 

16 (59.26%) 

2 (10%) 

5 (25%) 

0 (0%) 

13 (65%) 

0.391* 3 (6.38%) 

12 (25.53%) 

3 (6.38%) 

29 (61.70%) 

Years of 

experience 

 

Mean±SD 6.47±5.80 8.11±9.76 0.948^ 7.14±7.70 

>10 years 

5-10 years 

<5 years 

5 (18.52%) 

8 (29.63%) 

14 (51.85%) 

7 (35%) 

1 (5%) 

12 (60%) 

0.082* 12 (25.53%) 

8 (17.02%) 

27 (57.45%) 

Academic 

degree 

 

BSC 

MSC 

PhD 

22 (81.48%) 

2 (7.41%) 

3 (11.11%) 

18 (90%) 

2 (10%) 

0 (0%) 

0.300* 40 (85.11%) 

4 (8.51%) 

3 (6.38%) 

*Statistical analysis by chi square test; ^ Statistical analysis by Mann Whitney U test. 
 

Assessment of the pharmacist's role in the 

diagnosis of diarrhea 

At the 1st assessment visit (Before using 

the developed application), the most commonly 

asked questions by pharmacists were: "Who is the 

patient?" and "What are the disease symptoms?". 

Meanwhile, questions about the action taken and the 

recent travel history were not asked by any 

pharmacist. Additionally, the average number of 

questions asked to the SP was about 1.5 questions. 

Furthermore, 19% of the pharmacists supplied the 

SP with the medication without asking him any 

questions. Additionally, a non-significant difference 

was detected in all of the above questioning skills 

between the group of pharmacists who used the 

application and those who did not use it (Table 2). 

At the second assessment visit, all 

questions necessary to assess diarrhea were 

significantly improved only among pharmacists who 

used the application. Moreover, the average number 

of questions asked to the SP was significantly 

increased to about 5 times among the group of the 

application users, while it was decreased non-

significantly among the non-users of the application. 

Consequently, the optimum assessment of the 

diarrhea case (by asking all necessary questions) 

was significantly improved by participants who 

actively used the application. All of the 

aforementioned positive changes were also 

significant in the whole study sample. Further 

details are given in Table 2. 



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.31(2) 2022                                                                                                                                       The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

249 

 

Table 2. Assessment of the pharmacist's role in the diagnosis of diarrhea  
 

Diagnostic questions Application users (n=27) Application non-users Difference at end of 

the study# 

All participants (n=47) 

Baseline 

N (%) 

End of 

the study 

N(%) 

P value Baseline 

N (%) 

End of 

the 

study 

N(%) 

P 

value 

P value Baseline 

N (%) 

End of the study 

N(%) 

P value 

Who is the patient? 21 

(77.78) 

27 (100) 0.041 16 (80) 12 0.344 <0.0001 37(78.72) 39 (82.98) 0.804 

What are the disease symptoms? 8 (29.63) 26 

(96.30) 

<0.0001 7 (35) 3 (15) 0.219 <0.0001 15 

(31.91) 

29 (61.7) 0.007 

How long is the duration of diarrhea? 5 (18.52) 26 

(96.30) 

<0.0001 1 (5) 0 (0) 1.00 <0.0001 6 (12.77) 26 (55.32) <0.0001 

What is the action taken by the patient? 0 (0) 24 

(88.89) 

<0.0001 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.00 <0.0001 0 (0) 24 (51.06) <0.0001 

Questioning about medical history of the 

patient 

6 (22.22) 27 (100) <0.0001 2 (10) 3 (15) 1.00 <0.0001 8 (17.02) 30 (63.83) <0.0001 

Questioning about medication history of the 

patient 

2 (7.41) 26 

(96.30) 

<0.0001 0 (0) 2 (10) 0.500 <0.0001 2 (4.26) 28 (59.57) <0.0001 

Additional conditions that 

necessitate referral 

Recent 

history of 

antibiotic 

usage 

1 (3.7) 25 

(92.59) 

<0.0001 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.00 <0.0001 1 (2.13) 25 (53.19) <0.0001 

Recent 

history of 

travel 

abroad 

0 (0) 26 

(96.30) 

<0.0001 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.00 <0.0001 0 (0) 26 (55.32) <0.0001 

No any question was asked 5 (18.52) 0 (0) 0.063 4 (20) 8 (40) 0.344 <0.0001 9 (19.15) 8 (17.02) 1.00 

Diagnosis of the case Number of 

questions 

asked by 

the 

pharmacist* 

1.59±1.45 7.67±1.11 <0.0001 1.3±0.92 1±1.03 0.230 <0.0001 1.47±1.25 4.83±3.50 0.0001 

 Optimum 

assessment 

of the case 

0 (0) 24 

(88.89) 

<0.0001 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.00 <0.0001 0 (0) 24 (51.06) <0.0001 

* Maximum number of questions is 8 questions.  

# Difference at the end of study values between application users and non-users.  



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.31(2) 2022                  The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

250 

 

Assessment of the pharmacist's role in diarrhea 

treatment 

At the 1st assessment visit (Before using the 

developed application), the non-pharmacological 

advice was mentioned appropriately to the SP by 

less than 5% of the participated pharmacists. 

Antimotility agents were dispensed by most (~ 90%) 

of the participated pharmacists. However, the choice 

of antimotility agent was appropriate (not 

contraindicated) by less than half of the participated 

pharmacists. Besides that, 1/5 of the participated 

pharmacists dispensed an antibiotic to the SP. 

Meanwhile, an optimum management for the SP 

case was detected by about 1/3 of the participated 

pharmacists. Treatment of diarrhea case was not 

significantly different at baseline level between the 

group of application users and non-users. At the 

second assessment visit, providing the SP with an 

appropriate non-pharmacological and 

pharmacological treatment was significantly 

improved only in the group of pharmacists who 

actively used the application at the time of the 

interview with the SP. All the above improvements 

were detected also in the whole study sample. 

Further details are shown in table 3. 

Assessment of the participant's role in patient's 

counseling and education about the prescribed 

antimotility medication  

At the 1st assessment visit (Before using the 

developed application), about 1/3 of the pharmacists 

dispensed a medication without providing the SP 

with any educational information about it. 

Pharmacists provided the SP with an average of one 

educational point, in which the dose (33%) and 

dosing regimen (26%) of the dispensed antimotility 

agent were the most frequently, mentioned 

information. On the other hand, no any participant 

mentioned the treatment time scale and the possible 

side effects of the dispensed product. All 

participated pharmacists failed to provide the SP 

with appropriate counseling and education. 

At the second assessment visit, counseling 

the SP with the necessary information about 

dispensed medication was improved only by the 

group of pharmacists who actively used the 

application; however, significant improvement was 

detected only in regard to information about the drug 

dose and dosing frequency. Additionally, the 

average educational points mentioned to the SP was 

increased significantly by pharmacists who used the 

application (from 1.11 to 2.15), while it was 

decreased by application non-users (1 to 0.7). 

Furthermore, the number of pharmacists who 

dispensed a medication without providing the SP 

with any educational information about it was 

decreased significantly by the group of application 

users. All of the aforementioned positive changes 

were also significant in the whole study sample. All 

details are given in Table 4. 

 

Participants' opinions about the developed 

application 

About two-thirds of the participated 

pharmacists strongly agreed with the ease of 

application use and its ability to reduce diagnosis 

and medication errors. On the other hand, about 3/4 

of pharmacists showed an agreement about the 

application's ability to reduce the time needed to 

deal with diarrhea cases and its applicability for use 

in daily clinical practice (Table 5). Furthermore, 

there was a non-significant difference between the 

users and non-users of the application in regard to 

their rating of the developed application (Table 6). 



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.31(2) 2022                  The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

251 

 

 

Table 3. Assessment of the pharmacist's role in treatment of diarrhea  
 

 

Application users (n=27) Application non-users (n=20) 

Difference at 

end of the 

study# 

All study participants (n=47) 

Baseline 
End of the 

study 
P value Baseline End of the study P value  Baseline 

End of the 

study 
P value 

Advising the patient about the non-pharmacological measures 

Mentioned 

appropriately 
1 (3.70) 

20 

(81.42%) 
<0.0001 

1 (5%) 1 (5%) 

1.00 <0.0001 

2 (4.26%) 21 (44.68%) 

<0.0001 
Not mentioned 26 

(96.30%) 
7 (18.52%) 19 (95%) 19 (95%) 45 (95.76%) 26 (55.32%) 

The dispensed product to treat diarrhea 

Anti-motility agent 23 

(85.19%) 
27 (100%) 

0.125 

19 (95%) 20(100%) 

1.00 1.00 

42 (89.36) 47 (100%) 

0.063 Products other than 

anti-motility agents  4 (14.81%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 5 (10.64%) 0 (0%) 

Dispensing an 

additional product 

(e.g., ORS, 

antibiotics) with the 

antimotility agent 

 

 

 

4 (14.81%) 

 

 

 

1 (3.7%) 

 

 

 

0.375 

 

 

 

6 (30%) 

 

 

 

1 (5%) 

 

 

 

0.063 

 

 

 

0.828 

 

 

 

10 (21.28%) 

 

 

 

2 (4.26%) 

 

 

 

0.021 

Antibiotics 

dispensed^ 

5 (18.52%) 0 (0%) 0.063 7 (35%) 1 (5%) 0.031 0.240 12 (25.53%) 1 (2.13%) 0.001 

Treatment of the case 

Number of 

medications 

dispensed 

 

1.15±0.36 

 

1.04±0.19 

 

0.180 

 

1.30±0.47 

 

1.10±0.31 

 

0.102 

 

 

0.510 

 

1.21±0.41 

 

1.06±0.25 

 

0.011 

Appropriateness of 

the dispensed 

medication(s) $ 

 

11 

(40.74%) 

 

26 

(96.30%) 

 

<0.0001 

 

4 (20%) 

 

8 (40%) 

 

0.289 

 

<0.0001 

 

15 (31.91%) 

 

34 (72.34%) 

 

<0.0001 

ORS= oral rehydration solution. $Appropriate treatment of the case through recommending a suitable antimotility agent (not contraindicated and not interacted with the patient's 

medications) without antibiotic therapy. ^ Some antibiotics were dispensed with antimotility agents while others dispensed alone. # Difference at the end of study values 

between application users and non-users.  

 

 

 

 

 

 



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.31(2) 2022                  The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

252 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 4. Assessment of the pharmacist's role in patient's counseling and education about the prescribed antimotility medication. 
 

 

Application users (n=27) Application non-users (n=20) 

Difference at 

end of the 

study# 

All study participants (n=47) 

Baseline 
End of the 

study 
P value Baseline End of the study 

P 

value 
 Baseline 

End of the 

study 
P value 

Education about the Initial drug dose 

Appropriate 9 (33.33%) 22 (81.48%) 0.002 7 (35%) 5 (25%) 0.727 <0.0001 16 (34.04%) 27 (57.45%) 0.043 

Inappropriate 18 (66.67%) 5 (18.52%)  13 (65%) 15 (75%)  31 (65.96%) 20 (42.55%) 

Education about the drug Dosing frequency 

Appropriate 9 (33.33%) 20 (74.07%) 0.007 5 (25%) 4 (20%) 1.00 <0.0001 14 (29.79%) 24 (51.06%) 0.041 

Inappropriate 18 (66.67%) 7 (25.93%)  15 (75%) 16 (80%)  33 (70.21%) 23 (48.94%) 

Education on the duration of taking the medication (Treatment time scale) 

Appropriate 0 (0%) 2 (7.41%) 0.500 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1.00 0.214 0 (0%) 2 (4.26%) 0.500 

Inappropriate 27 (100%) 25 (92.59%) 20 (100%) 20(100%) 47 (100%) 45 (95.74%) 

Education about the possible medication side effects 

Appropriate 0 (0%) 3 (11.11%)  

0.250 

0 (0%) 0 (0%)  

1.00 

 

0.123 

0 (0%) 3 (6.38%)  

0.250 Inappropriate (not 

mentioned) 

27 (100%) 24 (88.89%) 20 (100%) 20 

(100%) 

47 (100%) 43 (93.62%) 

 

Patient education & counseling $ 

No any advice was 

given to the SP 

 

10 (37.04%) 

 

1 (3.70%) 

 

0.012 

 

6 (30%) 

 

13 (65%) 

 

0.023 

 

<0.0001 

 

16 (34.04%) 

 

14 (29.79%) 

 

0.832 

Points of 

information that 

was given to the 

patient (Max = 4 

points) 

 

 

1.11±1.05 

 

 

2.15±0.86 

 

 

0.001 

 

 

1.1±0.91 

 

 

0.7±0.98 

 

 

0.210 

 

 

<0.0001 

 

 

1.11±0.98 

 

 

1.53±1.16 

 

 

0.070 

Points of 

information that is 

given to the patient 

in a correct way 

(Max = 4 points) 

 

 

 

0.89±0.85 

 

 

 

1.78±0.93 

 

 

 

0.003 

 

 

 

1.0±0.79 

 

 

 

0.45±0.83 

 

 

 

0.078 

 

 

 

<0.0001 

 

 

 

0.94±0.82 

 

 

 

1.21±1.10 

 

 

 

0.206 

Appropriate 

patient education 

and counseling (all 

4 points) 

 

 

0 (0%) 

 

 

1 (3.70%) 

 

 

1.00 

 

 

0 (0%) 

 

 

0 (0%) 

 

 

1.00 

 

 

0.384 

 

 

0 (0%) 

 

 

1 (2.13%) 

 

 

1.00 

$Patient education must include information about drug dose, drug dosing regimen, drug side effect, and treatment time scale.  



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.31(2) 2022                  The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

253 

 

 

Table 5. Pharmacists’ opinions about the developed application (all participants) 

Parameter Strongly 

agree 

Agree 

 

Neutral 

 

Disagree 

 

Strongly 

disagree 

P value* 

Ease of use 31 (65.96%) 12 (25.53%) 1 (2.13%) 2 (4.26%) 1 (2.13%) <0.0001 

Reduce time 10 (21.28%) 24 (51.06%) 9 (19.15%) 1 (2.13%) 3 (6.38%) <0.0001 

Reduce 

diagnosis 

errors 

32 (68.09) 10 (21.28%) 2 (4.26%) 1(2.13%) 2 (4.26%) <0.0001 

Reduce 

medication 

errors 

30 (63.83%) 13 (27.66%) 1 (2.13%) 2 (4.26%) 1 (2.13%) <0.0001 

Applicability 

in daily clinical 

practice 

20 (42.55%) 15 (31.91%) 9 (19.15%) 1 (2.13%) 2 (4.26%) <0.0001 

 

Strongly agree score= 10 and 9; agree score = 7 and 8; Neutral score = 5 and 6; disagree score = 3 and 4; 

strongly disagree score = 1 and 2. *Statistical analysis by chi square test. 
 

Table 6. Rating of the application: A comparison between application users and non-users. 

Parameter Study Group Strongly 

agree 

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly 

disagree 

P 

value 

Ease of use Application users 17 (63%) 9 (33.33%) 0 (0%) 1 

(3.70%) 

0 (0%) 0.361 

Application non-

users 

14 (70%) 3 (15%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 

Reduce time Application users 6 

(22.22%) 

15 (55.56%) 4 

(14.81%) 

1 

(3.70%) 

1(3.70%) 0.671 

Application non-

users 

4 (20%) 9 (45%) 5 (25%) 0(0%) 2 (10%) 

Reduce 

diagnosis 

errors 

Application users 19 

(70.37%) 

7 (25.93%) 1 

(3.70%) 

0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0.310 

Application non-

users 

13 (65%) 3 (15%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 2 (10%) 

Reduce 

medication 

errors 

Application users 21 

(77.78%) 

5 (18.52%) 1 

(3.70%) 

0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0.070 

Application non-

users 

9 (45%) 8 (40%) 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 1 (5%) 

Applicability 

in daily 

clinical 

practice 

Application users 16 

(59.26%) 

6 (22.22%) 

 

4 

(14.81%) 

0 (0%) 1 

(3.70%) 

0.090 

Application non-

users 

4 (20%) 9 (45%) 5 (25%) 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 

Strongly agree score= 10 and 9; agree score = 7 and 8; Neutral score = 5 and 6; disagree score = 3 and 4 strongly 

disagree score = 1 and 2. 
 

Discussion 
The results of the current study showed that 

only 57.4% of participated were found to use the 

application during the visit of the SP in their 

pharmacies. This finding may indicate that the usage 

of the application is either not easy or not beneficial 

for the pharmacist. However, this explanation is 

rejected because the agreement about the 

application's benefits and its ease of use was not 

significantly different between pharmacists who 

used the application and those who did not use it. 

Instead, the shyness of some pharmacists to use a 

mobile device during the patient interview may be 

the main reason for the non-usage of the application 

(19). 

Regarding the assessment of diarrhea, the 

current study showed that the most commonly asked 

questions to the SP were related to the patient age 

and diarrhea associated symptoms. On the other 

hand, questioning about action taken and the history 

of recent travel were not asked by any pharmacist. 

This finding was similar to the behavior of Sudanese 

community pharmacists when they deal with 

diarrhea cases (20). Additionally, the poor 

questioning skills of the participated pharmacists in 

the current study were also found in a pilot study that 

assessed the role of the community pharmacists in 

the management of the common cold in Baghdad, 

Iraq (21). 

 



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.31(2) 2022                  The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

254 

 

Furthermore, the current study showed that 

about one fifth of the pharmacists supplied the SP 

with a medication without asking him any question. 

This problematic finding was also obtained in other 

studies conducted in Vietnam (22,23) and in Belgium 
(24). The main reason for such finding was the lack 

of financial incentives for the pharmacist who 

performs this service (assessment of the patient 

case) as compared to those who just dispense the 

medication without any assessment of the case (25). 

The results of the present study showed that the 

assessment of the diarrhea case using WWHAM 

questions was improved after providing pharmacists 

with the developed application and training them on 

it. The improvement in pharmacists questioning 

skills was also found in studies that refreshed 

pharmacists' knowledge through a training meeting 

with role-play (26). However, the current 

improvement could not be attributed to the training 

of pharmacists, since such improvement was not 

detected among pharmacists who trained about the 

application but not used it. Indeed, the improvement 

by such training meetings was not always optimum 

or significant (26), due to the fact that knowledge 

enhancement by educational interventions is 

transient and may decline with time as a result of 

forgetfulness (27). On the other hand, the 

improvement in questioning skills by the usage of 

the application is expected to be greater and more 

persistent than any other educational intervention 

because the possibility of forgetting scientific 

information while using the application is very 

limited. Therefore, the only explanation for the 

current improvement in pharmacists questioning 

skills was the usage of the developed application. 

Similarly, the number of mandatory questions asked 

by the pharmacist to patients with allergic rhinitis 

was doubled after using a computerized pharmacy 

decision support system (28). This encouraging 

benefit in pharmacists' questioning skills by the 

usage of the application was confirmed by the strong 

agreement of the participated pharmacists on the 

ability of the application to reduce diagnosing 

errors. 

Regarding the pharmacist's role in the 

treatment of diarrhea, the results of the present study 

showed that most pharmacists did not advise the SP 

about the necessary lifestyle changes during 

diarrhea management. A similar finding was 

obtained in studies conducted in Sudan (20) and 

Vietnam (22). This limited focus on the non-

pharmacological advice could be explained by the 

fact that all pharmacists focus on dispensing 

pharmacological agents (12) and thus may forget or 

neglect the non-pharmacological part of treatment 

while managing diarrhea and other minor ailments. 

In the second assessment visit, advising the SP with 

non-pharmacological measure was significantly 

improved; this improvement was evident only 

among pharmacists who used the application and 

can be attributed to the ability of the application to 

prevent the unintentional missing of the non-

pharmacological advice by reminding pharmacists 

with the necessary non-pharmacological 

information. Other mobile applications were also 

effective to remind users to perform a specific 

function and thus prevent unintentional missing 
(29,30). 

The present study also showed that the 

dispensing of antimotility agents was increased, 

while the dispensing of antibiotics was reduced at 

the second assessment visit. Such improvement was 

detected among all participated pharmacists and not 

limited to those who used the application. This 

improvement may be linked with the possible 

improvement in pharmacists' knowledge about the 

optimum management of diarrhea during the 

training session about the developed application. 

Despite this improvement, the selection of an 

appropriate antimotility agent according to the SP 

case was not improved among pharmacists who did 

not use the application. This means that the 

improvement in the pharmacist's scientific 

knowledge was not sufficient to improve the 

selection of an appropriate antimotility agent to the 

SP, instead proper case assessment (31,32) along with 

a good scientific knowledge are the key elements to 

ensure optimum management of the patient case. 

Meanwhile, the selection of appropriate treatment 

was significantly improved among the application 

users, which indicates the benefit of the application 

in improving the pharmacist's role in management of 

diarrhea. This benefit was confirmed by the strong 

agreement on the ability of the application to reduce 

medication errors by all of the participated 

pharmacists. 

Regarding patient counseling and 

education, the results of the current study showed 

that 1/3 of the participated pharmacist did not 

provide the SP with any educational information; 

meanwhile, those who educated the SP do so by 

focusing mainly on the medication dose and dosing 

frequency while neglecting the treatment time scale 

and the possible side effects of the dispensed 

product. This poor counseling skill was detected in 

many other studies conducted in Iraq (21, 33; 34). There 

are many possible reasons behind this poor 

counseling activity by Iraqi pharmacists. The first 

reason is the lack of pharmacists' sufficient time in 

the pharmacy to remember and mention all needed 

information to the patient (35). The second reason can 

be related to the insufficient pharmacist scientific 

knowledge (35). This poor scientific pharmacist 

knowledge can be mainly attributed to the decline in 

such knowledge with time (forgetfulness) due to the 

lack of continuous medical education programs for 

graduated pharmacists (35). On the other hand, the 

current study results showed that the average 

educational points mentioned to the SP was 

increased significantly and the number of 



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.31(2) 2022                  The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

255 

 

pharmacists who dispensed a medication without 

providing the SP with any educational information 

about it was decreased among pharmacists who used 

the application. This improvement may be linked 

with the ability of the application to enhance 

pharmacists' scientific knowledge and reduce the 

time needed to remember all the required medical 

information. Despite all these improvements, 

mentioning side effects of the dispensed 

medications was only modestly and non-

significantly improved among the application users. 

This can be explained in that reasons other than lack 

of pharmacist time and scientific knowledge may be 

behind the poor patient education and counseling. In 

this regard, it was found that pharmacists usually 

provide their patients with more counseling about 

drugs with prominent side effects (36), and since OTC 

anti-motility drugs are generally safe and well-

tolerated drugs (37). Thus, it is expected that 

pharmacists, even after using the application, may 

neglect informing the SP about the side effects of the 

dispensed medication. Therefore, it is not sufficient 

to provide the pharmacists with the application and 

train them on its usage unless this is accompanied by 

reassurance on the role of the pharmacist in warning 

(informing) the patient about all possible medication 

side effects (duty to warn) (38) without regard to the 

dispensed medication since this duty enable the 

patient to detect drug harmful effects at early 

reversible stage (39). 

In conclusion the diarrhea management 

step by step application is an effective method to 

improve the pharmacist's role in assessment and 

management of diarrhea.  
 

Reference  
1. Abbas A. The role and scope of pharmacists in 

community settings: a review of developing 

countries. Int J Allied Med Sci Clin Res. 

2014;2(1):32-35. 

2. Ibrahim IR, Al-Tukmagi HF, Wayyes A. 
Attitudes of Iraqi society towards the role of 

community pharmacists. Innov pharm. 

2013;4(2):1-10. 

3. Sharrad AK. Attitude of consumers towards 
community pharmacists and their interest in 

expanding community pharmacist services in 

Basra, Iraq: A pilot study. AJPS. 

2017;17(2):112-122. 

4. Watson MC, Ferguson J, Barton GR, Maskrey V, 
Blyth A, Paudyal V, et al. A cohort study of 

influences, health outcomes and costs of patients' 

health-seeking behaviour for minor ailments 

from primary and emergency care settings. BMJ 

Open. 2015;5(2):e006261,2014–006261. Doi. 

10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006261 

5. GBD 2016 Diarrhoeal Disease Collaborators. 
Estimates of the global, regional, and national 

morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of 

diarrhoea in 195 countries: a systematic analysis 

for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. 

Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(11):1211-1228.  

6. Yusuff KB, Makhlouf AM, Ibrahim MI. 
Community pharmacists' management of minor 

ailments in developing countries: A systematic 

review of types, recommendations, information 

gathering and counselling practices. Int J Clin 

Pract. 2021;75(10):e14424.  

7. Aziz MM, Masood I, Yousaf M, Saleem H, Ye 
D, Fang Y. Pattern of medication selling and 

self-medication practices: A study from Punjab, 

Pakistan. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194240.  

8. Whittlesea C, Hodson K. Clinical pharmacy and 
therapeutics. 6th ed. China. Elsevier; 2019.  

9. Krinsky DL, Ferreri SP, Hemstreet B, etal. 
Handbook of non prescription drugs. 18th ed. 

United States. American Pharmacists 

Association (APhA); 2014. 

10. Chisholm-Burns MA, Schwinghammer TL, 
Malone PM, etal. Pharmacotherapy principle and 

practice. 5th ed. United States. McGraw-Hill 

Education; 2019. 

11. Joseph AA, Odimayo MS, Oluwayemi I O, 
Fadeyi A, Dada SA. An Overview of the 

Aetiologic Agents of Diarrhoea Diseases in 

Children: How far Have We Gone in 

Management and Control?. Med J Zambia. 

2017;44(4): 266-275. 

12. Ibrahim IR, Palaian S, Ibrahim MIM. 
Assessment of diarrhea treatment and counseling 

in community pharmacies in Baghdad, Iraq: A 

simulated patient study. Pharm Pract. 

2018;16(4):1313. 

13. Al Hassan WS, Al Habeeb QS. Self-medication 
needs and practice of community pharmacies in 

Duhok. Edorium J Public Health 

2019;6:100023P16WH2019. 

14. Jadhav S, Nikam K, Gandhi A, Shinde N, 
Salunkhe K. Applications of Computer Science 

in Pharmacy: An Overview. Natl J Physiol 

Pharm Pharmacol. 2012;2(1):1-9. 

15. Abdlatif AA, Ahmad NA, Bandar FA, Khaled 
TA, Naif MA, Nasser SA, et al. Mobile phone 

text messaging for pharmaceutical care in saudi 

arabia: a pilot study. Int J Pharm. 2013;3(2):312-

5. 

16. Saima A, Aisha S, Naveed S, Qamar F, Sarwar 
H. Use of Computer Software and Databases in 

Different Fields of Pharmacy: A Meta-Analysis. 

RADS J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2017;5(2):55-63. 

17. Mikhael EM, Al-Hamadani FY, Hadi AM. 
Design and evaluation of a new mobile 

application to improve the management of minor 

ailments: a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res. 

2022;22(1):920. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-

08292-9. 

18. Xu T, de Almeida Neto AC, Moles RJ.A 
systematic review of simulated‐patient methods 

used in community pharmacy to assess the 



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.31(2) 2022                  The benefits of using mobile application in the management of diarrhea                    

256 

 

provision of non‐prescription medicines. Int J 

Pharm Pract. 2012 Oct;20(5):307-19.  

19. Davies MJ, Collings M, Fletcher W, Mujtaba H. 
Pharmacy Apps: a new frontier on the digital 

landscape? Pharm Pract (Granada). 2014 

Jul;12(3):453.  

20. Hamadouk RM, Arbab AH, Yousef BA. 
Assessment of Community Pharmacist’s 

Practice and Patient Counselling Toward Acute 

Diarrhea Treatment in Khartoum Locality: A 

Simulated Patient Study. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 

2021; 10: 145–152.  

21. Mikhael EM. Evaluating the Rationality of 
Antibiotic Dispensing in Treating Common Cold 

Infections among Pharmacists in Baghdad – Iraq. 

British Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 

2014; 4(23): 2653-2661 

22. Pham DM, Byrkit M, Pham HV, Pham T, 
Nguyen CT (2013) Improving Pharmacy Staff 

Knowledge and Practice on Childhood Diarrhea 

Management in Vietnam: Are Educational 

Interventions Effective? PLoS ONE 8(10): 

e74882.  

23. Duong D, Le T, Binns CW. Diarrhoea 
management by pharmacy staff in retail 

pharmacies in Hanoi, Vietnam. Int J Pharm 

Pract. 1997;5(2):97-100. 

24. Driesen A, Vandenplas Y. How do pharmacists 
manage acute diarrhoea in an 8-month-old baby? 

A simulated client study. Int J Pharm Prac. 2009; 

17(4):215-20. DOI: 10.1211/ijpp/17.04.0004 

25. Hazen, A.C., Sloeserwij, V.M., Zwart, D.L. et al. 
Design of the POINT study: Pharmacotherapy 

Optimisation through Integration of a Non-

dispensing pharmacist in a primary care Team 

(POINT). BMC Fam Pract 16, 76 (2015).  

26. Seubert LJ, Whitelaw K, Hattingh L, Watson 
MC, Clifford RM. Interventions to enhance 

effective communication during over-the-

counter consultations in the community 

pharmacy setting: A systematic review. Res Soc 

Admin Pharm. 2018;14(11):979-988.  

27. Kang CY, Duncan GJ, Clements DH, Sarama J, 
Bailey DH. The Roles of Transfer of Learning 

and Forgetting in the Persistence and Fadeout of 

Early Childhood Mathematics Interventions. J 

Educ Psychol. 2019 May; 111(4): 590–603.  

28. Bertsche T, Nachbar M, Fiederling J, et al. 
Assessment of a computerised decision support 

system for allergic rhino-conjunctivitis 

counselling in German pharmacy. Int J Clin 

Pharm. 2012;34(1):17-22. 

29. Saghaeiannejad-Isfahani S, Ehteshami A, Savari 
E, Samimi A. Developing the Medication 

Reminder Mobile Application “Seeb”. Acta 

Inform Med. 2017 Jun; 25(2): 108–111. doi: 

10.5455/aim.2017.25.108-111.  

30. Osahon PT, Mote LA, Ntaji VI.Assessment of 
the impact of medPlan®, a medication reminder 

mobile application, in glaucoma patients in 

Benin City, Nigeria. Tropical Journal of 

Pharmaceutical Research December 2020; 19 

(12): 2677-2682 

31. van der Zande RL, Koster ES, Teichert M, 
Bouvy ML. Allergic rhinitis self-care advice in 

community pharmacies: A simulated patient 

study. Exploratory Research in Clinical and 

Social Pharmacy. 2021;4: 100086.  

32. C.R. Schneider, A.W. Everett, E. Geelhoed, P.A. 
Kendall, R.M. Clifford Measuring the 

assessment and counseling provided with the 

supply of nonprescription asthma reliever 

medication: a simulated patient study Ann 

Pharmacother, 43 (9) (2009), pp. 1512-1518, 

33. Al Hassan WS, Al Habeeb QS. Self-medication 
needs and practice of community pharmacies in 

Duhok. Edorium J Public Health 

2019;6:100023P16WH2019 

34. Mikhael EM. Community Pharmacists' Attitudes 
and Practice in the Management of Minor 

Ailments. Iraqi J Pharm Sci. 2021; 5(2):225-230. 

35. Mohammed SI, Dawood EB, Abaas IS. 
Perceptions and Attitudes of Community 

Pharmacists’towards Patient Counseling and 

Continuing Pharmacy Education Programs in 

Iraq. Iraqi J Pharm Sci. 2019; 28(2): 30-36. 

36. Ejeta F, Feyisa D, Kebede O, Aferu T, Siraj J, 
Feyissa D, Wodajo E, Tamiru A. Medication 

Counseling Practices in Medicine Retail Outlets 

Found in Bench Sheko Zone, Southern Nations, 

Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region, South West 

Ethiopia. Pragmat Obs Res. 2021;12:105-117. 

doi. 10.2147/POR.S322407 

37. Kumpf VJ. Pharmacologic Management of 
Diarrhea in Patients With Short Bowel 

Syndrome. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014;38(1 

Suppl):38S-44S. 

38. Sinha HK. Role of pharmacists in retailing of 
drugs. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2014 Jul-Sep; 

5(3): 107. 

39. Saqib A, Atif M, Ikram R, Riaz F, Abubakar M, 
Scahill S. Factors affecting patients’ knowledge 

about dispensed medicines: A Qualitative study 

of healthcare professionals and patients in 

Pakistan. PLoS ONE 13(6): e0197482.

 

 

 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/