Abstract:


Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.20(1) 2011                                                                  HbA1c and foot ulceration 

 

 19 

Measurements of HbA1c for Patients with Diabetes   

Mellitus and Foot Ulceration 
Mohammed A.Taher

*,1
   , Mayada M. Moustafa

*
, Aqeel S. Mahmood

**
  

 

*Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences,College of Pharmacy,University of Baghdad,Baghdad, Iraq. 

 **Medical City , Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq. 

 
Abstract 
         People with diabetes can develop different foot problems. In the blood stream glucose reacts with 

hemoglobin to make a glycosylated hemoglobin molecule called hemoglobin A1c or HbA1c, the more 

glucose in the blood the more hemoglobin A1c will be present in the blood. The HbAlc test is currently 

one of the best ways to check diabetes to be under control.  The aim of study is to compare between the 

blood investigations which includes the fasting blood sugar and HbAlC (glycosylated hemoglobin), and 

to evaluate the benefit of  HbAlc (measurement for diabetic patients with foot ulcer,  to be a good 

indicator for controlling blood glucose). Sixty patients with type2 diabetes mellitus from the outpatient 

clinic of Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Medical City over the period from Nov. 2006 to Nov. 2008, were 

included in the study. Follow up was done only to 30 patients with diabetic foot ulcer. Twenty 

(66.66%) were males and 10(33.33%) were females their age range from (23-75) years (mean age of 

52years), and 21 normal subjects as control. A (Glycohemoglobin HbAl-Test/fast lon-Exchange Resin 

Separation Method) kit was used. The data finding that there is a greater association between HbAlc 

level and foot ulceration healing. There is a relationship between the age of the patients and the HbAlc 

level. The patients who used (Glibenclamide+Metformin) have the lower range of HbAlC, while those 

who use (Metformin) have the higher level of HbAlc. HbAlc (glycosylated hemoglobin) is most 

accurate test to determine actual reading over the past 2-3 months, and to evaluating the risk of 

glycemic damage to the tissues. So, we recommend the HbAlc testing, but it can't be used to monitor 

day-to-day blood glucose concentration because it's not influenced by fluctuation in blood 

concentration. 

Key words: Diabetic foot ulcer, HbAlc 

 الخالصة 
ّىٓ اْ تتطٛر ٌد٠ُٙ اٌحاٌة اٌّزظي١ة اٌيٝ اابيابة بتمز يا  ليٟ اٌميدَ ج ليٟ ِميزٜ اٌيدَ  ش٠ يا  ّاٌّصاب١ٓ بداء اٌسىزٞ ِٓ اٌ         

ٚوٍّيا وأيك و١ّية اٌىٍٛويٛس  HbA1cاٚ  A1cاٌىٍٛوٛس تٍتصك با١ٌّٙٛغٍٛب١ٓ ٌتى٠ٛٓ وال٠ىٛس١ال٠تد ١ّ٘ٛغٍٛب١ٓ ٚتدعٝ ١ّ٘ٛغٍيٛب١ٓ 

ٚا يد ِيٓ  HbA1cٚ يد ليٟ ااٚٔية ااة١يزن بياْ ااسيتاأة باةتتيار ِسيتٜٛ  اوثز ج ٌمد A1cلٟ اٌدَ اوثز وٍّا وأك و١ّة ا١ٌّٙٛغٍٛب١ٓ 

اٌغا٠ة ِٓ ٘ذٖ اٌدراسة ٌٍّمارٔة بي١ٓ اٌطيزق اٌّتتاية ٚاٌّاتّيد ع١ٍٙيا ليٟ  ٞ اٌٛالع تحك اٌس١طزن جالعً اٌطزق ٌٍتحمك ِٓ ِزض اٌسىز

ٌسيىزٞ ليٟ  اٌية اٌصي١اَ ِٚمارٔتيٗ باةتتيار ِسيتٜٛ اٌس١طزن عٍٝ ٔستة اٌسيىز ٌيدٜ اٌّزظيٝ اٌسيىزٞ ِيٓ إٌيٛن اٌثيأٟ خ ِثيً اةتتيار ا

 30شخص ِصاب١ٓ بّزض اٌسىزٞ ِٓ إٌيٛن اٌثيأٟ ٚاسيتّز  اٌدراسية عٍيٝ  60اٌىال٠ىٛس١ال٠تد ١ّ٘ٛغٍٛب١ٓ ج ا ز٠ك اٌدراسة عٍٝ 

%( ج 33.33) 10( ٚاأيا  66.66%) 20سٕة ٚواْ عيد  اٌيذوٛر  75-23شخص ُِٕٙ ِصاب بتمز ا  لٟ اٌمدَ ٚبّادي عّزٞ ِٓ 

شخص س١ٍُ غ١يز ِصياب بيداء اٌسيىزٞ ٌٚي١ه ٌد٠يٗ تمز يا  )ِمّٛعية سي١طزن( ٚليد ٚ يدٔا ٔت١مية ٘يذٖ اٌدراسية بياْ   21بـ وّا استا١ٓ

ج وّيا ٚ يدٔا ٕ٘يان عاللية بي١ٓ عّيز ٚشيفاء تمز يا  اٌميدَ  HbA1cتف١يد بياْ ٕ٘يان عاللية وت١يزن بي١ٓ ِسيتٜٛ  إٌتائج اٌّستحصيً ع١ٍٙيا

ٛس١ال٠تد ١ّ٘ٛغٍٛب١ٓ لٟ اٌدَ خ ويذٌه ٚ يدٔا ِيٓ ةيالي ٘يذٖ اٌدراسية بياْ اٌّزظيٝ اٌّاياٌم١ٓ بّمّٛعية اا ٠ٚية اٌّز٠ط ٚٔستة اٌىال٠ى

اٌّخفعيية ٌٍسييىز )١ِتفييٛر١ِٓ ي و١ٍت١ٕىالِا٠ييد( لييد أخفييط ِسييتٜٛ اٌىال٠ىٛسيي١ال٠تد ١ّ٘ٛغٍييٛب١ٓ اوثييز ِييٓ ِمّٛعيية اٌّزظييٝ اٌييذ٠ٓ 

٠ىٛس١ال٠تد ١ّ٘ٛغٍٛب١ٓ اعٍٝ ج تستٕتج اٌدراسة باْ اٌىال٠ىٛس١ال٠تد ١ّ٘ٛغٍٛب١ٓ ٘يٛ استاٍّٛا )ا١ٌّتفٛر١ِٓ( لمط  ١ث واْ ِستٜٛ اٌىال

اشٙز سابمة ٌٚتمد٠ز اٌخطٛرن اٌتٟ ٠تازض ٌٙا اٌّصياب ج ٌيذٌه ٔٛبيٟ باسيتاّاي  3 – 2ابح اةتتار ٌتا١١ٓ اٌم١ّة اٌحم١م١ة ٌٍسىز بّدن 

 جّة اٌسىز اٌّتغ١زن ١ِٛ٠ااط١ٕا ل١اةتتار اٌىال٠ىٛس١ال٠تد ١ّ٘ٛغٍٛب١ٓ  تٝ ٚاْ واْ ا٠

Introduction 
         People with diabetes  can develop 

different foot problems
[1,2]

. Foot problems 

most  often occur  when there is neuropathy, 

poor blood flow , or changes in  the shape of 

feet toes  
[2-4]

 , Ulcers occur  most often on the 

ball of the foot or in the bottom of the big toe. 

Neglecting ulcers can result in infections, 

which in turn may lead to loss of a limb
[5]

. 

Diabetic patients are at higher risk and they 

show 2 - 4 times more likely to have heart 

disease or suffer a stroke than people without 

diabetes
[5-7]

. In the blood stream glucose reacts 

to the hemoglobin to make a hemoglobin 

molecule called hemoglobin A1c  (HbA1c), the 

more glucose in the blood , the more 

hemoglobin  A1c will be formed in the 

blood
[6,7]

 . About 90% of hemoglobin is 

hemoglobin A
[7]

. 

 

1Corresponding author E- mail : mayada_aga@yahoo.com 

Received : 9/5/2010 

Accepted : 3/1/2011 

 

 

 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=3690
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=3690


Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.20(1) 2011                                                                  HbA1c and foot ulceration 

 

 20 

Although one chemical component accounts 

for 92% of hemoglobin A, approximately 8% 

of hemoglobin A is made up of minor 

components that are chemically slightly 

different. These minor components include 

hemoglobin A1c, A1b, A1a1, and A1a2. 

Hemoglobin A1c is a minor component of 

hemoglobin to which glucose is bound. Thus 

it's referred to as glycosylated or glucosylated 

hemoglobin
[8-10]

.The HbA1c test is currently 

one of the best ways to check diabetes is under 

control. The HbA1c level changes slowly, over 

10 week, so it can be used as a ((quality 

control)) test
[11-13]

. Hemoglobin A1c was first 

separated from other forms of hemoglobin by 

Huisman and Meyering in 1958 using a 

chromatographic column.
[12]

 It was first 

characterized as a glycoprotein by Bookchin 

and Gallop in 1968.
[13]

 Its increase in diabetes 

was first described in 1969 by Samuel Rahbar 

and coworkers the reactions leading to its 

formation were characterized by Bunn and his 

co-workers in 1975.
[14, 15]

 The use of 

hemoglobin A1c for monitoring the degree of 

control of glucose metabolism in diabetic 

patients was proposed in 1976 by Anthony 

Cerami, Ronald Koenig and coworkers
[16]

. In 

the normal 120-day life span of the red blood 

cell, glucose molecules react with hemoglobin, 

forming glycosylated hemoglobin. In 

individuals with poorly controlled diabetes, the 

quantities of these glycosylated hemoglobins 

are much higher than in healthy people 
[16, 

17]
.Once a hemoglobin molecule is 

glycosylated, it remains that way. A buildup of 

glycosylated hemoglobin within the red cell 

therefore reflects the average level of glucose 

to which the cell has been exposed during its 

life cycle 
[18, 19]

. Measuring glycosylated 

hemoglobin assesses the effectiveness of 

therapy by monitoring long-term serum 

glucose regulation. The HbA1c level is 

proportional to average blood glucose 

concentration over the previous four weeks to 

three months 
[20]

. Some researchers state that 

the major proportion of its value is related to a 

rather shorter period of two to four weeks. 
[7]

. 

The 2010 American Diabetes Association 

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes added 

the A1c ≥ 6.5% as another criterion for the 

diagnosis of the diabetes
[21]

. There were 

numbers of laboratories techniques used to 

measure glycosylated hemoglobin 
[22]

: 

 high-performance liquid chromatography 
(HPLC).  

 Immunoassay.  

 
 
 

Patients and methods 
         Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 

with foot ulcers seen in the outpatient clinic of 

Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Medical City over 

the period from Nov. 2006 to Nov. 2008.  A 

total number of 30 patients with diabetic foot 

ulcer and 21 normal subjects.. The age of 

patients range from 23-75 years (mean age 52), 

as shown in table (1) and occupation of the 

patients, in table (2). Diagnosis of the presence 

of foot ulcers was made by a specialist 

physician through physical examination and x-

ray examination.  

For every case, the following had been done,  

1. Patient medical history recorded.  
2. Full physical examination, a complete 

blood picture and renal function test. 

3. Lab. Investigations: 
a. Fasting blood sugar: was measured in 

serum obtained for all subjects blood by a 

commercial kit obtained from Biomaghreb, 

using the enzymatic method
(23)

. 

b. HbAlC (glycosylated hemoglobin): Method 
of measurement was followed according to 

the instructions mentioned in 

glycohemoglobin  HbA1-test kit which 

obtained from Wiesbaden-Germany using 

blood specimens and EDTA as 

anticoagulant
(24) .

  

4. Request form was given to all patients 
which include the details of age, sex, 

occupation, symptoms, site of ulcers, table 

(3). 

5. All 30 patients with diabetic foot ulcer 
were put on therapy with oral 

hypoglycemic drugs for 3months (we 

measured their fasting blood sugar and 

HbAlC before and after the therapy). These 

drugs, metformin [500mg, 2/day] 

Glibenclamide [5mg, 2/day]         and 

combination of Glibenclamide 5mg 

(2/day)+ Metformin 500mg (2/day)
(25)

, 

table (5). 

6. The relationship of patients age and 
(HbAlC and FBS) were determined, table 

(7). 

7. A control groups: The control group was 
represented by 21 apparently healthy  

persons and their FBS (fasting blood sugar) 

and HbAlC were measured, table(4). 

8. Data were expressed as mean ± standard 
deviation and differences between means 

were analyzed by paired student's t-test. P 

value less than 0.05 were considered 

significantly different. 

 
 
 
 

http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=3608
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromatography
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycoprotein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-pmid4874776-2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Rahbar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-pmid1201013-4
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Cerami
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Cerami
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-pmid934240-5
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_blood_cell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_blood_cell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diabetes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_life_cycle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_life_cycle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-6
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Diabetes_Association
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-6
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HbA1c#cite_note-1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-performance_liquid_chromatography
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immunoassay


Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.20(1) 2011                                                                  HbA1c and foot ulceration 

 

 21 

Results 
          The percentages of diabetic foot ulcer 

were greater over 70 years old and less under  

30 years old, table (1). While table (2), Shows 

the more effected diabetic patients with foot 

ulcer were laborers and employees and less 

were students. The biggest sites of  foot ulcer 

were on the bottom of the big toe and less at 

the ball of the foot, table (3).Table (4), shows 

significant difference between FBS & HbA1c 

for diabetic foot ulcer patients and control 

group. In table (5), Patients who used 

metformin or Glibenclamide and the 

combination of them (Glibenclamide + 

Metformin) the mean±value HbAlC decreased 

significantly after treatment p<0.05. FBSof 

patients who used Metformin or Glibenclamide 

and combination of them (Glibenclamid 

+Metformine) the mean± value of FBS 

decreased significantly compared with the 

mean value before treatment ,and  table (6), 

shows patients who used combination of 

(Glibenclamide+Metformin) have higher 

percentage (53.84%) of healing than patients 

treated with Glibenclamide 30.0% or 

Metformin 28.57% .Table (7), Shows the 

highest level of HbAlC and FBS over 70 years 

old patients with foot ulcer and the lowest level 

of HbA1c and FBS under 30 years old. Fig.(1)  

Show the significant +ve correlation between 

age and HbA1c% r=0.82, p< 0.01. 

Fig. (2): Show that age of the patients is 

proportional to FBS were r=0.8, p< 0.01. 

For people without diabetes Mellitus, the 

normal range for the HbA1c≤6.2%. (70%) of 

patients whom have HbA1c level less than 

(9.79%) did not complain from any 

complications. And (30%) of patients with 

high HbA1c (9.79-11.07%) shows that they 

suffered from some of the following 

complications: 

a.  Retinopathy (impairment of vision, 
exudation and retinal hemorrhage). 

b. Neuropathy (pain, numbness, and loss 
of sensation). 

c. Nephropathy (pleural effusions, ascites, 
subcutaneous oedema in legs, high 

blood urea levels, high serum creatinine 

levels and albuminuria). 

d. Gastropathy . 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1 : Age distribution 

N = 30 

 

Table 2 : The occupation of the patients 
 

Occupation Percent 

Farmer 15   % 

Housewife 24.5  % 

Laborers and employees 32.5   % 

Student 3.5    % 

Retired 24.5   % 

Total 100   % 

N = 30 

 

Table 3 : The site of foot ulcers distribution. 
 

Site Number of 

patients 

Percent 

Ball of the foot 12 40% 

Bottom of the big 

toe 
18 60% 

Total 30 100% 

N = 30 

 

Table 4: Fasting blood sugar and 

glycosylated hemoglobin in control subjects 

and diabetic foot ulcer. Before starting 

treatment. 
 

 
Control 

(n=21) 

Diabetic foot 

ulcer 

(n=30) 

FBS 

(mg/dL) 
83 ± 5.04 a 243.83 ± 7.10 b 

HBA1c % 3.41 ± 0.17 a 9.25 ± 0.21 b 

Data are expressed as mean ± SD. 

n=number of patients. 

Non-identical superscripts (a,b) represent 

significant difference, P<0.001). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Age group Percentage of diabetic foot 

ulcer 

Less than 30 5.5  % 

30-39 8.5  % 

40-49 7.5   % 

50-59 24.5  % 

60-69 21.5 % 

70-75 32.5% 

Total 100  % 



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.20(1) 2011                                                                  HbA1c and foot ulceration 

 

 22 

Table 5 : HbA1c and FBS levels for patients with diabetic foot ulcer after and before treatment 
 

 HbA1c % FBS 

 Before After Before After 

Metformin 

(n=7) 
9.06 ± 0.2 a 6.64 ± 0.08 a* 238.85 ± 8.08 a 138.98±5.01 a* 

Glibenclamide 

(n=10) 
9.64 ± 0.32 a 6.65 ± 0.06 b* 248.08 ± 7.10 a 134.00±5.54 b* 

Metformin + 

Glibenclamide 

(n=13) 

9.05 ± 0.12 a 6.31 ± 0.07 c* 244.56 ± 6.13 a 124.6 ± 3.94 c* 

Data are expressed as mean ± SD. 

n=number of patients. 

*P<0.05 with respect to pre-treatment value. 

Non-identical superscripts (a,b,c) represent significant difference among groups, P<0.05). 

 

Table 6 : Percentage of healing after treatment for diabetic foot ulcer patients. 
 

Treatment 
Patient 

No. 
Dose 

Healing 

cases 

Percentage of 

healing 

Metformin 7 500mg (2/day) 2 28.57% 

Glibenclamide 10 5mg (2/day) 3 30.0% 

Glibenclamide + Metformin 13 
5mg (2/day) + 

500mg (2/day) 
7 53.84% 

 

Table 7 : Distribution of mean HbA1c and 

FBS among the patients with foot ulcer.  

Age group HbA1c% FBS (mg/dl) 

<30 8.18 ± 0.12 205 ± 5.25 

30-39 8.56 ± 0.13 218.66 ± 6.67 

40-49 9.79 ± 0.29 275.5 ± 13.07 

50-59 10.99 ± 0.29 345.75 ± 18.46 

60-69 11.01 ± 0.27 344.4 ± 19.39 

>70 11.07 ± 0.64 354.5 ± 41.07 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure  1 : The relationship between HbA1c 

and Age. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2: The relationship between FBS and 

Age. 

 

Discussion and conclusion 
         The present study reflecting the 

recommended tests and examinations, to assess 

the diabetic care
(26,27)

. Diabetes is most 

commonly associated with many micro and 

macrovascular abnormalities. One of these 

serious complications is the foot ulcer 

development in patients with poor glucose 

level control.  HbA1c is the a useful indicator 

of how well the blood glucose level has been 

controlled in the recent past and may be used 

to monitor the effects of diet,excrcise and drug 

therapy on blood glucose in diabetic patients 

..Most patients in this study (60%) have ulcer 

in bottom of the big toe, while 40% have ulcer 

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

H
b

A
1
c
%

 

Age (year) 

"r=0.82, P<0.01"

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 20 40 60 80

F
B

S
 (

m
g

/d
L

) 

Age (year) 

"r=0.8, P<0.01"



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.20(1) 2011                                                                  HbA1c and foot ulceration 

 

 23 

in ball of foot. This may be due to the low rate 

of blood circulation in these two sites, table (3)
 

(16)
. The groups of the patients were treated 

with either Metformin, Glibenclamide or a 

combination of (Glibenclamide + Metformin) 

showed no significant difference among them 

in respect to HbA1c and FBS before treatment. 

The mean value of the HbAlc and FBS after 

treatment in all groups decreased significantly 

P<0.05, table (5). However, combination 

therapy (Glibenclamide+Metformin) showed 

high percentage of healing than other patients 

who were on the Metformin or Glibenclamide 

alone. So this combination was the best 

treatment to control the HbA1c thus controlling 

the glucose level table(6), hence faster healing 

of foot ulcers. In this study we found that the 

older patients have higher HbAlc and FBS 

levels. That means older patients were with 

less compliance than younger patients, table 

(7). fig. (1), fig. (2). The higher HbA1c level 

was detected in ages higher than 70 years old, 

table (1)
 (28)

, indicating bad glycemic control. 

More percent of the patients were those with 

occupation as laborers and employees. This 

may be due to their hard work with defective 

circulation due to their diabetes, table (2). In 

July,2009, an international expert committee 

published a report that made the case for using 

the hemoglobin Alc assay to diagnose type2 

diabetics
(29)

. Moreover as of January 2010, the 

American Diabetes Association included Alc 

as an appropriate diagnostic test
 (21)

. It has been 

reported that high HbA1c levels increase the 

development and progression of eye, kidney 

and nerve complications in diabetes mellitus 

poor glucose control also increases the risk of 

short-term complications of surgery such as 

poor wound healing
(30-32)

. In our study patients 

with high HbA1c levels (9.79-11.07%) 

suffered from eye, nerve or kidney 

complications, while patients with HbA1c level 

less than (9.79%) did not suffer from 

complications. Since HbA1c is not influenced 

by daily fluctuations in blood glucose 

concentration. We recommended that people 

with diabetes should keep their HbA1c level 

less than (6.63%) by following diet and drug 

instructions, diabetes out of control could 

result in complications .Patients with diabetes 

mellitus should make HbA1c test every three 

months to determine whether their blood 

glucose have reached the target level of the 

control. Patients who have glucose level under 

good control may be able to wait longer 

between the blood tests, but it's recommended 

to be checked at least 2 times a year
 (33)

. 

 

 

 

References 
1. Edward J.B , Jessie H.A , Victoria , C.etal , 

Prediction of Diabetic Foot Ulcer 

Occurrence Using Commonly Available 

Clinical Information . Diabetes Care . 2006 

; Vol. 29 , No. 6 .  

2. Abbott CA, Carrington AL, Ashe H, et al. 
The North-West Diabetes Foot Care study 

incidence of, and risk factors, new diabetic 

foot ulceration in a community-based 

patient cohort. Diabet Med. 2002; 19:377-

384. 

3. Boulton AJ. , Kirsner RS , Vileikytel ; 
Clinical practice : neuropathic diabetic foot 

ulcers.N Engl J . Med.2004 ; 351 : 48 – 55 . 

4. Nieto FJ. Jrib arren C, Gross MD, 
Comstock GW. Cuher RG. Uric acid and 

serum antioxidant capacity. Areaction to 

atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosic 2000, 148, 

131-9. 

5. Baker JF, Krishnan E, Chen L, Schumacher 
HR. Serum uric acid and cardiovascular 

diseas: recent development, and where do 

the leave us. AmJ Med 2005; 118:816-826. 

6. Dehghan A, Van Hoek M, Sijbrands EJ, 
Hofman A, Witteman JC. High serum uric 

acid as a novel risk factor for type 2 

diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2008 Feb; 

31(2):361-2. 

7. Kanellis J, Kang DH. Uric acid as a 
mediator of endothelial dysfunction, 

inflammation, and vascular disease. Semin 

Nephrol 2005, 25:39-42. 

8. Waring WS, Mcknight JA, Webb DJ, 
Maxwell SR. Uric acid restores endothelial 

function in patients with type 1 diabetes 

and regular smokers. Diabetes 2006; 

55:3127-3132. 

9. American Diabetes Association. Standards 
of medical care in diabetes-2008. Diabetes 

Care. 2008; 31:S12-S54. 

10. Cowie CC, Rust KF, Byrd-Holt DD, 
Eberhardt MS, Flegal KM, Engelgau MM, 

Saydah SH, Williams DE, Geiss LS, Geiss 

LS, Gregg EW. Prevalence of diabetes and 

impaired fasting glucose in adults in the 

U.S. population: NHANES 1999-2002. 

Diabetes Care. 2006; 29(6): 1263-1268. 

11. Smith NL, Barzilay JI, Shaffer D, Savage 
PJ, Heckert SR, Kuller LH, Kronmal RA, 

Resnick HE, Psaty BM. Fasting and 2-hour 

postchallenge serum glucose measures and 

risk of incident cardiovascular events in the 

elderly: the cardrovascular Health study. 

Archives of Internal Medicine. 2002; 

162:209-216. 

12. Meigs JB, Nathan DM, D'Agostino RB Sr, 
Wilson PW; Framingham offspring study. 

Fasting and post challenge glycemia and 

cardiovascular disease risk: the 



Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.20(1) 2011                                                                  HbA1c and foot ulceration 

 

 24 

framingham offspring study. Diabetes Care 

2002; 10 1845-1850.  

13. Coutinho M, Gerstcin HC, Wang Y, Yusuf 
S. The relationship between glucose and 

incident cardiovascular events. A 

metaregression analysis of published data 

from 20 studies of 95, 783. Individuals 

followed for 12.4 years. Diabetes Care. 

1999; 22:233-240. 

14. Expert committee on the Dignosis and 
classification of Diabetes Mellitus Report 

of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis 

and Classification of Diabetes Millitus. 

Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 1183-1197. 

15. Acton KJ, Burrows NR, Geiss LS, 
Thompson T. Diabetes prevalence among 

America, Indians and Alaska Natives and 

over all population-United State, 1994-

2002. Morbidity and Mortality weekly 

Report, 2003; 52 (30); 702-704. 

16. Saydah SH, Geiss LS, Tierney E, Benjamin 
SM, Engelgan M, Brancati F. Review of 

the performance of methods to identify 

diabetes cases among vital statistics, 

administrative, and survey data. Annals of 

Epidemiology. 2004; 14(7):507-516. 

17. Gu K, Cowie CC, Harris MI. Mortality in 
adults with and without diabetes in a 

national cohort of the U.S. population, 

1971-1993, Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 1138-

1145. 

18. Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Solomon CG, Liu S, 
Willett WC, Speizer FE, Nathan DM, 

Manson JE. The impact of diabetes mellitus 

on mortality from all causes and coronary 

heart disease in women: 20 years of follow-

up. Archives of Internal Medicine: 2001; 

161: 1717-1723. 

19. Tsai C, Hayes C, Taylor GW. Glycemic 
control of type 2 diabetes and sever 

periodontal disease in the U.S adult 

population community. Dentistry and oral 

Epidemiology, 2002; 36(3): 182-192. 

20. Larsen ML, Horder M, Mogensen EF. 
"Effect of long-term monitoring of 

glycosylated levels in insulin-dependent 

diabetes mellitus". N. Engl. J. Med. 1990; 

323(15): 1021-5. 

21. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis 
and classification of diabetes mellitus. 

Diabetes care,2010;33:562-569. 

22. Rahbar S, Blumen feld O, Ranney HM. 
"studies of unusual hemoglobin in patients 

with diabetes mellitus". Biochem. Biophys. 

Res. Commun.1969; 36(5):838-43. 

23. Dingeon B.Ann Bio Clin. 1975;33:3. 
24. Nuttall, FD, Diabetes care 1998;21,1475-

1480   

25. Ellsworth, Witt, Mosby's medical drug 
reference. 2003 

26. Reynolds TM, Smellie WS, Tomey PJ; 
Glycated haemoglabin (HbAIC) montoring. 

BMJ. 2006 sep 16; 333(7568): 586-8. 

27. Beach KW; A theoretical model to predict 
the behavior of glycosylated hemoglobin 

levels. J Theor Biol. 1979 Dec; 81(3): 547-

61. 

28. Muller IS,de grauw WJ, van Gerwen WH, 
Bartelink ML,van Den Hoogen HJ,Rutten 

GE: Foot ulceration and lower limb 

amputation in type 2 diabetic patients in 

Dutch primary health care.Diabetes Care 

2002; 25,570-574   

29. The international Expert Committee. 
International Expert Committee Report on 

the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis 

and diabetes. Care,2009; 32:1327-1334 

30. Ollerton. RL, Playle R, Ahmed K, Dunstan 
FW, Luzio SD, Owens DR. Day-to-day 

variability of fasting plasma glucose in 

newly diagnosed type2 diabetic subjects. 

Diabetes Care, 1999; 22:394-398. 

31. Selvin E, crainiceanu CM, Brancati FL, 
Coresh J., Short-term-Varibility in 

measures of glycemia and implication for 

the classification of diabetes. Arch. Intern. 

Med. 2007 Jul 23;167(14): 1545-51. 

32.  Champe,P. (ed) ''biochemistry''.4
th

 edition 

2008;3:25-39. 

33. Samann A, Tajiyeve O. Prevalence of the 
diabetic foot syndrome at the primary care 

level in Germany. Diabet Med. 2008; 

25(5):557-63.