Role of Ezetimibe in combination with statins(Simvastatin and Atorvastatin) in controlling Dyslipidemia Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 1 Role of Ezetimibe in Combination with Statins(Simvastatin and Atorvastatin) in Controlling Dyslipidemia Falah H.Al-Malki * , Shatha H. Ali** ,1 and Gamal A.Abdulbari*** * Clinical Biochem. ,Clinical Lab. Science Dept. ,College of Pharmacy ,University of Basrah,Iraq ** Department of Clinical Laboratory Science,College of Pharmacy,University of Baghdad,Baghdad , Iraq *** College of Medicine ,University of Basrah, Iraq Abstract Cardiovascular risk is independently increased by plasma lipids abnormalities (low- density and high density lipoprotein -cholesterol and triglycerides). Most patients have more than one lipid abnormality. Combination therapy with lipid-modifying agents could offer an important therapeutic option for improving the overall lipid profile. Combinations have demonstrated to provide additive efficacy and significant reductions in coronary events . This study was designed to evaluate the effect of ezetimibe, when used in combination with other hypolipidaemic agents ( statins) on lipid profile as well as on liver function ,renal function, oxidative stress, and platelets function when given to dyslipidaemic patients . Forty four patients (24 males and 20 females) with age ranged between 40-70 years (54 ±14.6) with dyslipidaemia on statins therapy for at least 6 month were involved in this clinical trials. They were randomized into two groups treated with either a combination of 20 mg/day simvastatin or a combination of 20mg/day atorvastatin and 10mg/day of ezetimibe.The study also included 22 apparently healthy subjects with age ranged (40-70years) and sex(11males and 11 females) matching that of the patients group. Serum lipid profile (total cholesterol -TC, triglycerides -TG, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol –LDL-C, very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol-VLDL-C, and high density lipoprotein-cholesterol –HDL-C), oxidative stress marker (Malondialdehyde-MDA), liver functions indices (Alanin aminotransferase -ALT,Aspartate aminotransferase- AST, total bilirubin), renal function parameters (urea, creatinine, and microalbuminuria) and platelets function test (bleeding time)were evaluated before and after 4 and 6 weeks of starting ezetimibe treatment . Treatment with ezetimibe plus simvastatin or atrovostatin resulted in significant lowering in TC, TG, LDL-C levels with elevation in HDL-C also the LDL/HDL ratio lowered significantly ( by 38.16%). This effect was associated with significant changes in liver function , and oxidative stress without changes in platelets function nor in renal function. The results presented in this study indicated that ezetimibe can be used in clinical practice for the treatment of dyslipidaemia, when combined with other hypolipidaemic agents like simvastatin and atorvastatin to improve the therapeutic profile with ameliorating some of their adverse effects. Keywords : Ezetimibe , Statins , Dyslipidemia لخالصةا اٌ خطش أيشاض األٔػٛت انقهبٛت ًٚكٍ إٌ ٚضداد بصٕسة غٛش يؼخًذة ػُذ االخخالل فٙ انذٌْٕ انزالرٛت ٔانذٌْٕ انبشٔحُٛٛت ٔصذ اٌ يؼظى انًشظٗ نٓى أكزش يٍ خهم ٔاحذ فٙ انذٌْٕ. اٌ انؼالس انًشكب يٍ انًٕاد انًؼذنت نهذٌْٕ ػبنٛت انكزبفت ٔٔاغئت انكزبفت. ٔ انؼالس انًشكب ًٚكٍ اٌ ٚكٌٕ نّ فؼبنٛت إظبفٛت يغبببً ْبٕغبً يؼُٕٚبً . صٛت يًٓت نخحغٍٛ كم يغخٕٚبث انشحٕو فٙ انذوٕٚفش فبئذة ػال أصشٚج ْزِ انذساعت ٔصًًج نخقٛٛى فؼبنٛت االٚضحبًٚب يغ يٕاد خبفعت نهذٌْٕ يزم انغخبحُٛبث فٙ انخأرٛشاث ػهٗ انششاٍٚٛ انخبصٛت. إظبفت إنٗ حأرٛشِ ػهٗ ٔظبئف ، بحٛت ٔانًخًزهت بًغخٕٚبث اٚط انذٌْٕ ٔ فشغ األكغذة ٔٔظبئف انكبذ ٔانكهٗػهٗ يؼبٚٛش انكًٛٛبء انحٛ انصفٛحبث انذيٕٚت )صيٍ انُضف( ٔيقبسَت ْزِ انخأرٛشاث يغ أدٔٚت حقهٛذٚت خبفعت نهذٌْٕ )عًفبعخبحٍٛ ٔ احٕسفغخبحٍٛ( كُظبو يخخهػ يغ ( عُت 02-42اَبد( بؼًش ٚخشأط بٍٛ ) 42ركٕس، 44) يشٚعب (44ج ْزِ انذساعت ػهٗ ).اشخًه االصٚخٛبيٛب ػُذ يشظٗ انشحبو دٔٚت انغخبحٍٛ. حى حقغٛى انًشظٗ ػشٕائٛبً انٗ يضًٕػخٍٛ كبألحٙ:ببيشٚعبً بذاء انشحبو يغخًشٍٚ ػهٗ انؼالس 64.1± 44ٔبًؼذل يهغى ٕٚيٛبً ٔانًضًٕػت 62+42انغًفبعخبحٍٛ ٔاالٚضٚخبًٚٛب انًضًٕػت األٔنٗ: ْٙ يضًٕػت انًشظٗ انزٍٚ اعخخذيٕا َظبو يخخهػ بٍٛ يهغى ٕٚيٛبً. اعخًشث فخشة انًخببؼت عخت أعببٛغ يخخبنٛت. كزنك ظًٍ 62+42انزبَٛت ػهٗ َظبو يخخهػ بٍٛ االحٕسفبعخبحٍٛ ٔاالٚضٚخبًٚٛب حى قٛبط يغخٕٚبث (.44ًشظٗ ببنشحبو ٔبؼذد )انذساعت يضًٕػت يقبسَت يٍ األصحبء بأػًبس يقبسبت ٔبُفظ حٕصٚغ انضُظ نًضبيٛغ ان ٔٔظبئف انكهٗ (.AST,ALT T.Bil)ٔيؼبٚٛش فشغ االكغذة انًبنَٕذانذٚٓبٚذ ٔٔظبئف انكبذ (TC,TG,HDL,LDL)انشحٕو فٙ انذو (S.Urea,creatinine,MAU) ٔٔظبئف انصفٛحبث انذيٕٚت(Bleeding Time) اعببٛغ يٍ 4قبم اػطبء انؼالس ٔبؼذ يشٔس ػهٗ يغخٕٖ شحٕو أ االحشٔفبعخبحٍٛ اظٓشث ححبنٛم انبٛبَبث فشٔقب يؼُٕٚت ٔاظحت نالصٚخبيٛب يغ انغًفبعخبحٍٛاػطبء االصٚخبيٛب. ٔاَخفبض يهحٕظ فٙ َغبت HDLٔاسحفبع يغخٕٖ (TC,TG&LDL)انذو حٛذ نٕحع حصٕل اَخفبض يؼُٕ٘ فٙ حشاكٛض 1 Corresponding author E-mail : dr_ shathahali @ Yahoo.Com Received : 15/9/2008 Accepted : 22 / 11/2008 Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 2 LDL/HDL حغٛش يؼُٕ٘ فٙ ٔظبئف انكبذ حشافق يغALT,AST,T.Bil. .فٙ يؼبٚٛش فشغ االكغذة ححغٍ يؼُٕ٘ ظٓش كزنك عهبٛت راث دنٛم يؼُٕ٘ نٕظبئف انكهٗ ٔانكبذ ٔانصفٛحبث نى ٚخى يالحظت أ٘ حأرٛشاث ظبْشة أ ٔ MD A يخًزهت ببَخفبض يغخٕٖ بكفبءة نؼالس اظبفًٙٚكٍ اعخُخبس يبٚهٙ :اٌ االصٚخبيٛب ًٚكٍ اٌ ٚغخخذو كؼالس اعتانذيٕٚت.فٙ ظٕء انُخبئش انخٙ افشصحٓب ْزِ انذس ًكٍ اٌ ٚحغٍ انفبئذة انؼالصٛت ٔيُغ يشض انشحبو ٔػُذيب ٚؤخز يغ ادٔٚت خبفعت نهكٕنٛغخشٔل كبنغًفبعخبحٍٛ ٔاالحشٔفبعخبحٍٛ ٚ انخأرٛشاث انضبَبٛت انًخٕقؼت. Introduction Dyslipidemia can be the result of a genetic predisposition, secondary causes or a combination of both .(1) The major lipid components of serum, Cholesterol and triglycerides can produce three forms of dyslipidemia: Hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia and a combination of both. In each case, the dyslipidemia is the result of an elevation in either the number or composition of specific lipoproteins , which is an important determinant for selecting the appropriate drug therapy .(2,3) .The NCEP guidelines for diagnosis of dyslipidemia, however, are based on clinical cut point that indicates relative risk for coronary disease. Including the general recommendation that total cholesterol and HDL levels to be measured every five years beginning at age 20 in persons who do have a family history of coronary heart or other atherosclerotic disease .(4) . LDL is considered as the primary atherogenic lipoprotein, and the smaller the size of the LDL particle, the more it is able to penetrate into subendothelial tissue, thereby contributes to the development of atherosclerosis .(5) For people with CHD, several large trials have demonstrated that aggressive lipid lowering is beneficial in people with CHD with considering the following points:- A target LDL. Cholesterol level below 70-80 mg/dl is recommended for people who have CHD and have multiple major risk factors (e.g patients with diabetes or who smoke). Patients who experience myocardial infraction (MI) should be started on the cholesterol lowering medication while in the hospital and are advised to make life style changes , regardless of their LDL-cholesterol level.A target LDL-cholesterol level less than 100mg/dl is recommended for people who have CHD but do not have many additional risk factors.Life style changes as well as medications may be recommended when LDL levels are greater than 100mg/dlWhilest for people without a history of CHD also appear to benefit from lipid lowering therapy although the treatments are not as aggressive as in patients with CHD (6) . Five major classes of drugs are available now for the treatment of dyslipidemia , each with different effects on the various lipids and lipoprotein profile (Table-1) ( 7,8). Statins are the most potent drugs available now for reducing LDL-C, they bring about moderately lower triglyceride level and modestly increase HDL-C levels (9) . Table ( 1 ) : Major classes of drug used in treating dyslipidemia (2) Drug class LDL-cholesterol HDL-cholesterol Triglycerid Statins 18%-55% 5%-15% 7%-30% Bile acid sequestrates 15%-30% 3%-5% No change or increase Niacin 5%-25% 15%-35% 20%-50% Fabric acid 5%-20% May be increased in patients with high triglyceride level 10%-20% 20%-50% Cholesterol absorption inhibitors 17%-19% 1%-4% 0%-6% Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 3 Statins are considered the first line treatment of hypercholesterolemia in patient who have failed to adequately respond to dietary therapy .(10,11) Currently available products include Simvastatin, Atorvostatin, Lovastatin , Pravastatin, Fluvastatin Rosuvastatin (12) . oral agent that competitively inhibits HMG-CoA reductase, the catalytic enzyme in the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonic acid in the rate limiting step of cholesterol biosynthesis . (13) Recently, a potential mechanism for poor response to statin therapy was described by Patel et al(2001), (14) where the poor responders had a low basal rate of cholesterol synthesis that may be secondary to a genetically determined increase in cholesterol absorption possibly mediated by a polipoprotein E4 or by polymorphism in the HMG-CoA reductase gene. (15,16) Generally statins are contra-indicated in active liver disease (or persistently abnormal liver function tests) and in pregnancy (adequate contraception required during treatment and for 1 month afterwards) and breast-feeding. (17) The side effects of statins are reversible myositis which is a rare but a significant side- effect of the statins. Simvastatin and atorvastatin also cause headache; altered liver- function tests (rarely, hepatitis) and gastro- intestinal effects including abdominal pain, flatulence, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. Rash and hypersensitivity reactions (including angioedema and anaphylaxis) have been reported rarely. (17) The new class of lipid modifying agents, cholesterol absorption inhibitors, acts to lower LDL-C concentrations by almost 20% regardless of concurrent therapy, and have a modest effect on HDL-C and triglycerides (18). Ezetimibe (Zetia, Merck/ Schering-plough pharmaceuticals) is the first agent approved in this class, might be a good option for patients who do not tolerate or respond to statin therapy .However, this product is contraindicated in patients with active liver disease. Ezetimibe acts through selective inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption . (19) Experimental studies suggest that ezetimibe prevents dietary and biliary cholesterol uptake that transport across the intestinal wall. (20,21) Ezetimibe -glucuronide, the primary metabolite, is transported from the liver back to the intestine in bile, and is a more potent inhibitor of cholesterol absorption than ezetimibe itself . (22) Relatively high level of fecal ezetimibe (69% of the administered dose) suggests limited absorption and possible hydrolysis of the glucuronide metabolite . (23) The dose of ezetimibe 10mg once daily .(17) The present study was designed to evaluate the possible effects of adding 10 mg daily dose of Ezetimbe (for 4 and 6 weeks) to hyperlipidemic patients ongoing with statins therapy (simvastatin 20 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg/day) on different components of lipoproteins in plasma, some biochemical markers for assessing liver , kidney and platelets function ,as well as , serum MDA levels. Materials and Methods This study was carried out in Al-Basrah General Hospital by selecting 44 patients (24 males and 20 females) with age ranged between 40-70 years (54 ± 14.6) presented with hyperlipidaemia (serum total cholesterol >200mg/dL ) for more than 6 months on statins ,not having any CVD, from December 2006 to march 2007 . Twenty two apparently healthy subjects with comparable age and weight were also involved in this study as a control .Fasting blood specimens were utilized for assessing lipid profile (total serum cholesterol ( 24) , triglyceride (25) , and high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (26 ), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (27) Liver function tests(Alanine minotransferase-ALT (Aspartate aminotransferase -AST (28) total bilirubin (29) , renal function tests (urea (30), creatinine (31) and microalbominurea -MAU (32) , platelets function tests (Bleeding time IVY method) (33) and oxidative stress (serum malondialdehyde –MDA (34) . Subjects were randomized into five groups: Group 1: which include 22 apparently healthy subjects (11 male, 11 female) that not received any therapy during the study. Group 2: which include 11 (6 male and 5 female) dyslipidaemic patients treated with Simvastatin 20 mg orally given as single daily dose at bed time for 6 weeks interval. Group 3: which include 11 (6 male and 5 female) dyslipidaemic patients treated with Atorvastatin 20 mg orally given as single daily dose at bed time for 6 weeks interval. Group 4: which include 11 (6 male and 5 female) dyslipidaemic patients treated with Simvastatin 20 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg orally taken at bed time for 6 weeks interval. Group 5: which include 11 (6male and 5 female) dyslipidaemic patients treated with Atrovastatin 20 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg orally taken at bed time for 6 weeks interval . All values were expressed as means ± standard error of mean. Data were analyzed by in dependent T-test to assess the difference between two groups. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant). (35) Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 4 180.50 179.82 179.36188.09 172.27 160.82 188.82 176.18 163.59 0 50 100 150 200 250 Before Ezetimibe addition 4weeks after Ezetimibe addition 6weeks after Ezetimibe Addition Time S er u m C h o le st er o l (m g /d l) Normal gp Simvistatin gp Atrovastatin gp Results Both simvastatin and atorvastatin treated groups (figure-1), showed no significant change in serum total cholesterol after 4 weeks of ezetimibe therapy ,but after 6 weeks of the addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin, there was a significant lowering in serum total cholesterol level as compared with both baseline . However , simvastatin treated group showed significant (p<0.05) reduction in serum TG levels after 4 weeks from the addition of ezetimibe (-28.6%)as compared with normal values , after 6 weeks from addition of ezetimibe it produced (-30.69%) reduction as compared with normal values (figure-2).While, 4 weeks of ezetimibe addition to atorvastatin produced a significant lowering (p<0.05) in serum TG level as compared to both normal and baseline values (-31.93%and -29.36%, respectively). After 6 weeks serum TG levels were lowered by(- 19.6%,-17.4%) as compared with normal and baseline values respectively.However, the hyperlipidemic group treated with simvastatin exert non significantly elevated levels of serum HDL-C after 4 weeks from the addition of ezetimibe (figure-3) . Figure (1) : A histogram showing serum total cholesterol, for Simvastain and Atrovastatin groups that received Ezitimibe; as compared with control * = significant at p<0.05 as compare with normal values in same column. a = significant at p<0.05 as compared with baseline values. Figure (2): A histogram showing serum triglyceride, for Simvastain and Atrovastatin groups that received Ezitimibe; as compared with control group * = significant at p<0.05 as compare with normal values in same column. a = significant at p<0.05 as compared with baseline values. 145.50 144.91 143.50 108.57 103.45 99.45 139.64 98.64 115.32 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Before Ezetimibe addition 4weeks after Ezetimibe addition 6weeks after Ezetimibe Addition Time S e ru m T ri g y c e ri d e s ( m g /d l) Normal gp Simvistatin gp Atrovastatin gp * * * a* * *a a Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 5 Figure (3): A histogram showing serum HDL-cholesterol, for Simvastain and Atrovastatin groups that received Ezitimibe; as compared with control group. * = significant at p<0.05 as compare with normal values in same column. But after 6 weeks there were significant (p<0.05) elevations in serum HDL-C level (15.4%,6.79%) as compared with normal and baseline values respectively .Atorvastatin group, showed significantly (p<0.05) higher serum HDL-C level before, after 4 weeks, and after 6 weeks from addition of ezetimibe. (10.19%, 19.66% & 18.21% respectively) as compared with value of normal group. Plasma LDL-C level was non significantly lowered after 4 weeks from addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin treated group (figure-4 ) but after 6 weeks there were a significant (p<0.05) lowering in serum LDL-C levels (-20.95%,- 21%) as compared with baseline and normal values respectively. While, atorvastatin group, showed no significant alteration in serum LDL-C level both after 4 and 6 weeks from addition of ezetimibe. However, simvastatin group showed no significant changes in LDL/HDL ratio after 4 weeks of ezetimbe therapy as compared to those values before adding ezetimbe and that of control (table .2) . Figure (4) : A histogram showing serum LDL-cholesterol, for Simvastain and Atrovastatin groups that received Ezitimibe; as compared with control group. * = significant at p<0.05 as compare with normal values in same column. 42.86 40.68 40.14 43.41 44.45 46.3647.23 48.68 47.45 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Before Ezetimibe addition 4weeks after Ezetimibe addition 6weeks after Ezetimibe Addition Time S e ru m H D L (m g /d l) Normal gp Simvistatin gp Atrovastatin gp * * * * 42.86 40.68 40.14 43.41 44.45 46.3647.23 48.68 47.45 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Before Ezetimibe addition 4weeks after Ezetimibe addition 6weeks after Ezetimibe Addition Time S e ru m H D L (m g /d l) Normal gp Simvistatin gp Atrovastatin gp * * * * Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 6 Table (2): Effect of Ezitimibe Addition on LDL/HDL ratio in patients treated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (Atrovastatin & Simvastatin); in comparison with normal individuals (values expressed as mean + standard error of mean , N= Number of subjects) * = significant at p<0.05 as compare with normal values in same column. a = significant at p<0.05 as compared with baseline values. But 6 weeks values were significantly (p<0.05) lowered (-38.16%,-35.29%) as compared with both baseline and control values respectively, a comparable results were obtained with atorvastatin treated group in LDL/HDL ratio (-27.5%,-12.68%)) as compared with normal and baseline values, respectively.In table -3, the studied groups exert a significant changes in serum ALT activity after 6weeks from addition ezetimibe (18.77%,5.66%)as compared to both baseline and control values respectively.While, the atorvastatine group exert no significant alterations in ALT activity in serum through the study. Simvastatin treated group of patients showed non significant elevation in serum AST activity after 4 weeks from addition ezetimibe(8.39%,11.7%) as compared with baseline and normal values ,respectively ,but after 6 weeks a significant (p<0.05) elevation in serum AST activity was noticed (13.6%)as compared to pretreatment value. Meanwhile, atoravastatin treated group was presented with a significant (p<0.05) lowering in serum AST activity (-7.12%,-14.4%)as compared with both baseline and normal values respectively. In simvastatin treated patients there was a significant (p<0.05)lowering in serum total bilirubin level(-15.5%,-17.09%) after4&6 weeks as compared to the control values, respectively ( table-3). In atorvastatin treated group, ezetimibe showed a significant (p<0.05)lowering in serum total bilirubin (- 8.18%, -13.6%) respectively as compared with baseline and normal values respectively. Table (3) : Effect of Ezetimibe addition on serum ALT , AST and Total bilirubin in patients treated with Simvastatin and Atrovostatin in comparison with normal Subjects ( values are expressed as mean ±SEM , N= Number of subjects) Groups Duration of treatment Serum ALT (IU/L) Serum AST IU/L Serum total Bilirubin Normal N=22 Base line values 13.82 ± 0.72 14.8±0.66 1.26±0.03 After 4 weeks 13.77 ± 0.55 13.86±0.58 1.16±0.5 After 6 weeks 13.59 ± 0.47 14.50±0.65 1.17±0.04 Patient treated with Simvastatin & Ezitimibe N=22 Base line values 12.09 ± 0.81 11.32±0.32* 1.03±0.04* After 4 weeks 14.18 ± 0.66 12.27±0.48* 0.98±0.03* After 6 weeks 14.36 ± 0.56 a 12.86±0.43a* 0.97±0.04* Patient treated with Atrovastatin & Ezitimibe N=22 Base line values 12.91 ± 0.60 12.77±0.56* 1.10±0.05* After 4 weeks 13.45 ± 0.50 11.86±0.54* 1.03±0.05 After 6 weeks 13.45 ± 0.36 11.45±0.46* 1.01±0.03* * = significant at p<0.05 as compare with normal values in same column. a = significant at p<0.05 as compared with baseline values. Groups Duration of treatment LDL/HDL ratio Normal N=22 Base line values 2.79 + 0.20 After 4 weeks 3.13 + 0.34 After 6 weeks 3.23 + 0.30 Patient treated with Simvastatin & Ezitimibe N=22 Base line values 3.38 + 0.43 After 4 weeks 2.51 + 0.23 After 6 weeks 2.09 + 0.15 * a Patient treated with Atrovastatin & Ezitimibe N=22 Base line values 2.68 + 0.22 After 4 weeks 2.35 + 0.24 After 6 weeks 2.34 + 0.19 * Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 7 (Table- 4) showed no significant alteration in serum urea level before and after 4 and 6 weeks from addition of ezetimibe to all studied groups, nor in serum creatinine levels ,nor in microalbuminuria values. Serum MDA levels simvastatin treated groups were presented with a significant (p<0.05) lowering in serum MDA ( -42% ) as compared with baseline values (figure-5) .After 4 and 6 weeks of utilizing ezetimibe in atrovastatin treated group serum MDA significantly (p<0.05) lowered (19.8%,26.7%) as compared with baseline values.The simvastatin and atorvastatin treated patients showed no significant alterations in bleeding time values by the addition of ezetimibe to their therapy ( table- 5). Table (4) : Effect of Ezetimibe addition on serum urea,creatinine and microalbuminuria in patients treated with Simvastatin and Atrovostatin in comparison with normal Subjects ( values are expressed as mean±SEM , N= Number of subjects ) Groups Duration of treatment Serum Urea(mg/dl) Serum Creatinine (mg/dl) Microalbuminuria (mg/day) Normal N=22 Base line values 39.00 ± 1.61 1.19±0.04 203.23±8.36 After 4 weeks 39.73 ± 2.03 1.16±0.05 207.09±11.3 After 6 weeks 37.91 ± 1.01 1.24±0.10 202.09±8.66 Patient treated with Simvastatin & Ezitimibe N=22 Base line values 39.43 ± 1.98 1.28±0.14 201.73±8.59 After 4 weeks 40.00 ± 2.09 1.31±0.15 204.09±14.80 After 6 weeks 39.27 ± 1.78 1.29±0.14 206.09±18.70 Patient treated with Atrovastatin & Ezitimibe N=22 Base line values 36.68 ± 2.08 1.13±0.04 211.55±10.40 After 4 weeks 35.23 ± 1.72 1.03±0.05 208.55±11.30 After 6 weeks 36.23 ± 0.97 1.11±0.02 209.05±17.40 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.88 0.69 0.51 1.01 0.81 0.74 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Before Ezetimibe addition 4weeks after Ezetimibe addition 6weeks after Ezetimibe Addition Time S e ru m M a lo n d ia ld e h y d e (m ic ro g ra m g /d l) Normal gp Simvistatin gp Atrovastatin gp Figure (5): A histogram showing serum Malondialdehyde for Simvastatin and Atrovastatin groups that received Ezitimibe; as compared with control group a = significant at p<0.05 as compared with baseline values. * = significant at p<0.05 as compare with normal values in same column. * a a* a a Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 8 Table (5): Effect of Ezitimibe Addition on bleeding time, in patients treated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (Atrovastatin & Simvastatin); in comparison with normal individuals (Values expressed as mean + Standard error of mean , N= Number of subjects ) Discussion As previously presented in figures (-1), (-2), (-3) and (-4) treatment with ezetimibe plus statins successfully improves lipid profile markers in dyslipidaemic patients during 6 weeks of treatment .These results are consistent with results of other studies that included the administration of ezetimibe plus statins to patients with disordered lipids profiles could result in significant reduction in TC, LDL-C and TG levels, (36) with significant elevation in HDL-C levels , which could be attributed to mechanisms that are related to ezetimibe lowering effect on cholesterol which could be complement to the inhibitory action of statins on cholesterol biosynthesis representing an important new option for treatment in combination with statin (37) . Ezetimibe has an excellent safety and liability profile when administered with statins (38,39) . Also it has a low potential for drug interactions. (40) Many patients receiving statins therapy fail to reach their LDL- goal (41) , because its mechanism of action is complementary to that of statins, ezetimibe were studied for its potential additive lipid- lowering effects in patients already receiving statin therapy in double-blind as well as placebo-controlled trials (36,42) . Significant improvements were observed for other indicators of CHD risk ( total cholesterol , non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, LDL-C: HDL- C ratio) in patients receiving ezetimibe-statin therapy. (36) When ezetimibe was combined with simvastatin or atorvastatin it caused a significant reduction in triglyceride level with time from baseline compared with statin monotherpy (43). Combination therapy of simvastatin and ezetimibe was more effective than atorvastatin in reducing LDL-C in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. (44) Preliminary studies have indicated that there were no significant effect of ezetimibe on absorption of fat-soluble vitamins (45) .Following absorption of ezetimibe where it is glucuronidated in the intestine wall the parent drug and its glucuronidated derivatives can undergo enterohepatic recircalation, that limits peripheral exposure (46) . Ezetimibe is first in cholesterol absorption inhibitors, it 's action is consistent with the binding thereby blocking of sterol transporter on the brush border membrane of in intestinal epithelial cells (47) . Through inhibiting the intestinal cholesterol absorption ezetimibe can effectively reduce of biliary/dietary cholesterol delivered to the liver via chylomicron and chylomicron reminants, hence reduce cholesterol content of atherogenic particles chylamicrons / chylomicrors ruminants, VLDL, LDL).Meanwhile the reduced delivery of intestinal cholesterol to liver increase hepatic receptor activity and increase clearance of circulating LDL-C. ( 47). Ezetimibe, via inhibiting intestinal cholesterol and plant-sterol absorption, may modify the atherogenicity of chylomicron remnants and reduce systemic plant-sterol levels (48) . These effects are likely to reduce cardiovascular risk. It has been reported that there is a strong relationship between hepatic dysfunction and dyslipidaemic complications (49,50) However, the data presented in table- 3 representing a modulation in some liver markers in group treated with simvastatin plus ezetimibe after 6 weeks of treatment in case of ALTand AST. Such results could be due to relatively low doses of statins (20mg) wherase, other studies revealed a significant elevation in those enzymes. (13) The elevation in transaminases activities were primarily asymptomatic and not Groups Duration of treatment Bleeding time (minutes) Normal N=22 Base line values 2.54 + 0.18 After 4 weeks 2.48 + 0.17 After 6 weeks 2.45 + 0.13 Patient treated with simvastatin & Ezitimibe N=22 Base line values 2.26 + 0.12 After 4 weeks 2.50 + 0.23 After 6 weeks 2.62 + 0.33 Patient treated with atrovastatin & Ezitimibe N=22 Base line values 2.26 + 0.20 After 4 weeks 2.97 + 0.35 After 6 weeks 2.17 + 0.35 Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 9 associated with cholestasis. Serum transaminases returned to pretreatment level with discontinuation of combination therapy or with continued treatment ( 51) . Ezetimibe is being used with increasing frequency in many patients to augment the LDL-cholesterol lowering effects of statins (52) The recent Second United Kingdom Heart and Renal Protection (UK-HARP-II) study found in a randomized, controlled study that 10mg of ezetimibe added to 20mg of simvastatin in patients with ( chronic kidney disease) CKD resulted in an incremental reduction of LDL- cholesterol level over simvastatin alone without an excess risk of abnormal liver or muscle markers or other advers events. (53) The purpose for the evaluation of renal function was to explor the safety of a combination of ezetimibe and statins in this respect .Statins at appropriately adapted doses have the same efficacy in chronic renal disease patients as in subjects with normal kidney function, and their tolerance is not a problem .(54) In the present study the effect of ezetimibe plus statins (simvastatin or atorvastatin) have no significant effect on renal function , as in table-4 . Therefore, no dosage adjustment for ezetimibe is needed in patients with renal insufficiency. Efforts to improve lipid profiles now are targeted primarily for the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease, may also prevent the development of renal disease (55) . One important risk factor for atherosclerosis is an elevation in a particular type of plasma cholesterol specifically LDL - C. Oxidation of LDL -C is thought to render the lipoprotein to be athergenic ,because oxidized -LDL is more readily taken up by macrophages via scavenger receptors. (56) The data presented in figures (5) showed that serum MDA levels were significantly lowered by about (-33.7%) when ezetimibe was added to simvastatin treated group after 6 weeks .Meanwhile, level of MDA was significantly lowered after 4 weeks from addition ezetimibe to atorvastatin treating group by about (- 19.8%) as compared with pretreatment values . However, MDA level after 6 weeks from addition ezetimibe to either groups lowered MDA level below those reported even for the normal group . Furthermore , the lowering effect on lipids pereoxidation produced by simvastatin/ezetimibe combination was better than that produced by ezetimibe/atorvastatin combination. (57) A recent study showed that despite the comparable modest reduction of serum cholesterol levels by ezetimibe, an intestinal inhibitor of cholesterol absorption, and statin, only the statin improved endothelial function (58) Thus, it is likely that the beneficial effects of statins on endothelial function extend beyond cholesterol reduction. Indeed, statins have been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in patients, irrespective of serum cholesterol levels (59) . In this study, the effects of adding ezetimibe to statins therapy (Simvastatin or Atorvastatin), in patients with dyslipidemia showed no significant changes in platelets function in both groups, this could indicate no adverse effect on platlets function as seen in table -5 .Although non of the studied groups of dyslipidaemic patients exert any deviation in bleeding time values from those reported from normal subjects ,before initiating ezetimibe therapy. This would support the administration ezetimibe plus simvastatin or atorvastatin without any adverse effect on platelets, so patients with platelets dysfunction could take ezetimibe with statin safely .However, there is no evidence or clinical trials about effect of ezetimibe with statins on platelets function and specifically on bleeding time. conclusions: 1. Ezetimibe can be used in combination with simvastatin or atorvastatin to improve their lipid-lowering action both effectively and safely in the treatment of dyslipidemia. 2. Ezetimibe can be used safely in combination with statins in patients with renal disease. 3. Ezetimibe exerts no further modification to liver function that could be produced by statins when used in combination with statins. 4. Ezetimibe/simvastatin and Eztimibe / atorvastatin could exert asignificant antioxidant effect in patients with dyslipidemia. 5. Non of the tested drugs (ezetimibe nor simvastatin nor atorvastatin) produced significant modification of platelets activity. References: 1. Rodondi KM: hyperlipidemia, in herfindal ET, Gourley DR (eds): Textbook of therapeutics drug disease management. Baltimor, Williams and Wilkins 1996 : 387 – 403 . 2. Mc. Kenney JM: Hyperlipidomia. Siscat. . Pharmacothereapy Self assessment program. Kansas city, American college of clinical pharmacy, 1991:65-94 . 3. Farmer JAand Gotto AMJ, choosing the right lipid regulating agent. Drug:1996 ; 52: 649 –61. 4. Kissebah AH, Integrated regulation of very low density lipoprotein,triglceride and apolipoprotien-B kinetics in man Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 10 :normolipemic subjects , familial hypertiglyceridemia ,and familial combined hyperlipidemia . Metabolism 1981;30:856-7. 5. Lioyd yy, Koda-Kimble MA.(eds) Applied therapeutics: The clinical use of drugs 17th ed, Applied therapeutics. Inc ,Vancouver;2001;1:1-43. 6. Third report of the NCEP Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adult (Adult treatment panel III) final report. Circulation 2002; 106: 3143-3421. 7. Bays HE , Moore PB , Drehobl MA , etal :The ezetimibe study group. Effectiveness and tolerability of ezetimibe in patient with primary hypercholesterolemia , pooled analysis of two phase studies, Clin. Ther 2001; 23:1204-30 . 8. Dujorne CA, Ettinger MP , Mc Neer JF, etal. The ezetimibe study group. Efficacy and safety of a potent new selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe in patient with primary hypercholesterolemia , A MJ cardiol 2002; 90: 1092-7. 9. Schecantm G, Hiatt J. Dose. Response charecterstics of cholesterol – lowering . drug . therapies: implications for treatment. Ann . Intern Med. 1996; 125: 990-1000. 10. Hussain S,Ismail SA,Mesheimish B,et al.Hypolipidemic effect of silymarin in dyslipidaemia of different etiologies. Clinical Pharmacol,2006;1:16-7. 11. Stein. EA: cerivastatin in primary hyperlipidemia; amulticenter of efficacy and safety. American Journal of cardiology 1998; 82:41J-46J. 12. Walker R and Edwards C (eds): Clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2nd Ed, Churchill Livingston, London ,1994;(1): 321-2. 13. Joseph T,Ropert L,(eds):Pharmacotherapy (Dyslipidemia) 6 th edition,McGraw- Hill,New York,2005; 432-3. 14. Patel DD, Knight BL, Clare Ky , Determination of a variable response to statin treatment in patient with refractory familial hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosclerosis thrombi vase Biol;2001;21:8 32-7. 15. Bottorff M, Hansten P long term safety of hepatic HMG-C0A reductase inhibitors. The role of metabolism monograph for physicians. Arch. Intern Med 2000; 160: 2273-80 . 16. Naoumova RP, Dunn S, Rallidisl, etal. Prolonged inhibition of cholesterol synthesis explains the efficacy of atorvastatin. J lipid Res 1997; 38 : 1496- 1500. 17. Martin J,Nicholas L,(Eds):British National Formulary,The British Medical Association;London and Royal pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain ,2003;(1)45:128-9. 18. Anonymous, Aco- operative trial in the primary prevention of ischemic heart disease using clofibrates report from the committee of principle investigators. British heart Journal 1978; 40:1096-1118 . 19. Van Heek M,France CF,Compton DS,et al.Invivo metabolism-based discovery of potent cholesterol absorption inhibitor ,SCH58235,,in the rat and rhesus monkey through the identification of the active metabolites of SCH48461.J pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;283:157-63. 20. Van Heek M,,Farley C,Compton DS,et al.Comparsion of activity and disposition of novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor,SCH58235,and its glucuronide, SCH60663.Br J Pharmacol2000; 129 : 1748-54. 21. Van Heek M,,Farley C,Compton DS,et al.Ezetimibe selectively inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption in rodents in the presence and absence of exocrine pancreatic function .Br J Pharmacol 2001;134:409-17. 22. Patrick JE,Kosoglou T,Stauber KL,et al .Disposition of the selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe in healthy male subjects.Drug Metab Dispos 2002;30:430-7. 23. Ezzet F ,Wexler D,Statkevich P,et al.The plasma concentration and LDL-C relationship in patients receiving ezetimibe.J Clin Pharmacol 2001;41:943- 9. 24. Richmond W. preparation and proprieties of cholesterol oxidase from No- cardio sp. And its application to enzymatic assay of total cholesterol in serum Clin Chem. 1973 , 19: 1350 -1. 25. Fossati P, principle L. serum triglyceride determined colorimetric ally with an enzyme that produce hydrogen peroxide . Clin Chem. 1982,28(10):2077-80. 26. Harris N,Galpchian V and Rifai N:Three routin methods for measuring high density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with the reference method.Clin Chem1996;42:738- 42. 27. Friedwald WT, Levy RI , Frdrickson DS. Estimation of LDL-C in plasma without use preoperative ultra centrifuge , Clin Chem. 1972 , 18 : 499-502 . Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 11 28. Reitmans , Frankel ,S:Acoloimetric method for dtermination of serum glutamic oxaloacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases Am. J. Clin . path. 1957 , 28 : 56 . 29. Vassault,A: Colorimetric method with Dimethyl sulfoxide(DMSO) for the quantitative dtermination of direct bilirubinin serum .Ann.Bio Clin 1986;44:685-6. 30. 30- Patton , CJ., Crouch , S.R. – spectra photo metric and kinetics investigation of Berthelot reaction for determination of ammonia , Anal. Chem.. 1977, 49:464-9 . 31. Varley H.(eds) : practical clinical Biochemistry , 5th Ed . London , 1980 : 4804 . 32. Mc Elderry LA , Tarbit IF , cassells – smith AJ, six methods for urinary protein compared . Clin. Chem. 1982, 28:356. 33. IVY,Acftal.The standardization of certain factor in the cutaneous (venostasis) bleeding time technique J.Clin Med 1941 (26)1812. 34. Buge J and A. Aust S.D. Microsomal lipid peroxidation . Method Enzymol . 1978, 52: 302 –10 . 35. Microsoft Excel 2003 36. Gagne C, Bays HE, Weiss SR, et al. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe added to ongoing statin therapy for treatment of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1084–91. 37. Shepherd J. The role of the exogenous pathway in hypercholesterolaemia. Eur Heart J 2001; 3 ( suppl E ) : E2 – 5. 38. Ballantyne CM, Houri J, Notarbartolo A, et al. Effect of ezetimibe coafministered with atorvastatin in 628 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a prospective, randomized, double – blind trial. Circulation 2003; 107 : 2409- 15 . 39. Davidson MH, McGarry T, Bettis R, et al. Ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 ; 40: 2125- 34. 40. Kosoglou T, Fruchart JC, Guillaume M, et al. Coadministration of ezetimibe and fenofibrate leads to favorable effects on apo CIII and LDL subfractions .Atherosclerosis 2001; 2 (suppl): 89-90. 41. Leitersdorf E . Cholesterol absorption inhibition : filling an unmet need in lipid – lowering management. Eur Heart J 2001 ; 3 ( suppl E ) : E 17 – 23. 42. Straka RJ ,Taheri R,Cooper SL,et al.Assessment of hypercholesterolemia control in a managed care organization.Pharmacotherapy 2001;21:818-27. 43. Kerzner B, Corbelli J, Sharp S, et al. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with lovastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 418- 24. 44. Ballantyne CM, Blazing MA, King TR, et al: Eficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin compared with atorvvasain in adults with hypercholesterolemia Am J Cardiol 2004 ; 93 ( 12 ) : 1487-94. 45. Bays HE, Moore PB , DrehobI MA et al: Effectiviness and tolerability of ezetimibe in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: pooled analysis of two phase II studies. Clin Ther 2001 ; 23 ( 8 ) : 1209- 30. 46. Mietinen TA: Cholesterol absorption inhibition: a strategy for cholesterol- lowering therapy. Int J Clin Prac 2001; 55 (10 ) : 710- 16. 47. Altmann SW,Davis HRJr,Zhu-LJ,et al:Niemann Pick G-like L.protein is critical for intestinal cholesterol absorption scienc 2004;303:1201-4. 48. Glueck CJ, Spiers J, Tracy T, et al. Relationships of serum plant sterols (phytosterols) and cholesterol in 595 hypercholesterolemic subjects, and familial aggregation of phytosterols, cholesterol, and premature coronary heart disease in hyperphytosterolemic probands and their first-degree relatives. Metabolism 1991; 40:842–8. 49. Lioyd yy, Koda-Kimble MA.(eds) Applied therapeutics: The clinical use of drugs 17th ed, Applied therapeutics. Inc ,Vancouver;2001;1:1-43. 50. Katzung BG. (eds), Basic and clinical pharmacology, 9th Ed, Appleton and Lange, California; 2004: 561-75. 51. Product. Information: VytorinTM, ezetimibe/simvastatin. Merck/Schering- plough pharmaceuticals, North wales, PA, (PI issued 07/2002) reviewed 11/2002 52. Kosoglou T,Statkevich P,Johnson- Levonas AO,et al:Ezetimibe: Areview of its metabolism,pharmacokinetics and drug interaction . Clin Pharmacokinet.2005;44:467-94. 53. Landray M,Cairns HS,Carr S,et al.The Second United Kingdom Heart And Renal Protection (UK-HARP-II)Study :Arandomized,Controlled study of the biochemical safety and efficacy of adding ezetimibe to simvastatin as intial therapy Iraqi J Pharm Sci , Vol.18 (1), 2009 Role of ezetimibe in combination with statins 12 among patients with CKD .AmJ Kidney Dis.2006;47:385-95. 54. Karie S,Launoy-Vacher V,Deray G,et alStatin in patients with kidney failure.efficacy,tolrence ,and prescription guidelines in patients with chronic kidney disease and renal transplants. Press Med.2006;35(2pt1):219-29. 55. Sarnak MJ: LAS: Cardiovascular disease and chronic renal disease: a new paradigm. Am J Kid Dis.2000; 35: 117– 131. 56. Heinecke ,J.W. Oxidants and antioxidants in Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis : Implication for the oxidized LDL hypothesis .Atherosclerosis.1998;141:1-15.[Medline] 57. Cai H,Harrison DG.Endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular disease:the role of oxidant sress. Circ Res.2000;87:840-4. 58. Landmesser U, Bahlmann F, Mueller M, et al. Simvastatin versus ezetimibe: pleiotropic and lipid-lowering effects on endothelial function in humans. Circulation. 2005; 111: 2356–63. 59. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002; 360: 7–22.