Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.27(2) 2018 Belief about medications in IBD DOI: https://doi.org/10.31351/vol27iss2pp32-41 32 Belief about Medications among Sample of Iraqi Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Nisreen J. Jebur *,1, Dheyaa J. Kadhim* and Nawal. M. Firhan ** *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. ** Gastroenterology and Hepatology Teaching Hospital, Medical city, Baghdad, Iraq. Abstract Inflammatory bowel disease includes both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic, progressive relapsing disease of gastrointestinal tract that require long-term treatment or maintenance therapy. Taking patient’s beliefs about the prescribed medication in consideration had been shown to be an important factor that affects compliance of the patient in whom having positive beliefs is a prerequisite for better compliance. The aim of the current study was to investigate and assess beliefs about medicines among a sample of Iraqi patients with inflammatory bowel disease and to determine possible association between these beliefs and some patient-specific factors. This study is a cross-sectional study carried out on 150 already diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease patients who attended the Gastroenterology and Hepatology Teaching Hospital/Medical City/Baghdad. The mean age of the patients was (31.7 ± 11.4 years).The number of ulcerative colitis patients was 74, while the number of Crohn’s disease patients was 76. Belief about medicines was measured using the Arabic version of the beliefs about medicines questionnaire. The majority of the patients (58%) had strong beliefs in the necessity of treatment (specific-necessity score greater than specific-concern). For all patients (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease together), there was a significant inverse correlation between male gender and specific concern score. Number of infliximab doses directly correlated with specific necessity score and inversely correlated with specific concern score. Future studies should investigate how interventional approaches addressing these predictors may lead to improve beliefs about medicines among inflammatory bowel disease patients and their impact on disease control. Key words: Inflammatory bowel disease, Beliefs about medicines, Beliefs about medicines questionnaire, Crohn’s disease, Ulcerative colitis. داء االمعاء االلتهابي العراقيينالمعتقدات عن األدوية لدى مرضى **مهدي فرحانو نوال *، ضياء كاظم جبار 1*، جمعه جبر نسرين بغداد،بغداد،العراق.،كلية الصيدلة،جامعة السريريةالصيدلة فرع * مستشفى أمراض الجهاز الهضمي والكبد ، مدينة الطب ، بغداد ، العراق. ** الخالصة ان مرض التهاب االمعاء والذي يضم مرضي التهاب القولون التقرحي ومرض كرون هو مرض مزمن متفاقم ومنتكس يصيب األخذ بعين االعتبار ان معتقدات المريض حول الدواء الموصوفمع االمعاء ويحتاج الى العالج بصورة مستمرة وعلى مدى طويل. العالج ب واحدة من أهم العوامل التي تؤثر على االلتزام بالعالج ، حيث ان المعتقدات اإليجابية حول األدوية هي شرط أساسي لاللتزام تعد اط وتحديد االرتبالتهاب االمعاء مرضى لدىل األدوية الموصوف للمريض . الهدف من الدراسة الحالية هو فحص وتقييم المعتقدات حو مريض تم تشخيصهم 150بعض العوامل الخاصة بالمريض. هذه الدراسة هي دراسة مستعرضة أجريت على والمحتمل بين هذا االعتقاد مريضا اما عدد 74كان . عدد مرضى التهاب القولون التقرحيسنة( 11.4± 31.7العمر )متوسط التهاب االمعاء مرضسابقا ب دى المعتقدات عن االدوية. وكان ل . تم تقييم المعتقدات عن االدوية باستخدام النسخة العربية من استبيانمريضا 76ى كرون فكان ضمر ( معتقدات قوية في ضرورة العالج )نسبة ضرورة العالج كانت أكبر من نسبة القلق من االثار الجانبية والمستقبلية %58غالبية المرضى ) بالنسبة للمرضى جميعهم )مرضى التهاب القولون التقرحي ومرض كرون( وجد هناك ارتباط معنوي عكسي بين جنس الذكور (.لألدوية دواء انفليكسيماب فقد ارتبط طرديا مع معيار الحاجة الخاصة وعكسيا مع معيار القلق الخاص. الخاص. اما عدد جرع قوبين معيار القل داء ى لدى مرضيجب ان تبحث الدراسات المستقبلية كيف يمكن للتداخالت المهتمة بهذه العوامل ان تحسن من المعتقدات حول االدوية االمعاء االلتهابي وتأثير ذلك على السيطرة على المرض. مرض كرون, التهاب القولون التقرحي. ،استبيان المعتقدات حول االدوية ، المعتقدات حول االدوية ، داء االمعاء االلتهابي الكلمات المفتاحية : 1Corresponding author: E-mail:asmrnn@yahoo.com Received: 4/ 8 / 2018 Accepted: 22/ 9 / 2018 Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences https://doi.org/10.31351/vol27iss2pp24-31 https://doi.org/10.31351/vol27iss2pp24-31 http://bijps.com/index.php/bijps/index Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.27(2) 2018 Belief about medications in IBD 33 Introduction Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes both Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic, progressive and relapsing disease of gastrointestinal tract, that is characterized by epithelial injury and intestinal inflammation (1-4). The exact etiology of IBD is still not fully understood, however, it is clear that many etiologic factors, including genetic susceptibility, the gut flora, and environmental exposures, are important contributors to the IBD (5). In general, symptoms may be similar in both patients with UC or CD (6). Symptoms vary from mild to severe during relapse which may decrease or disappear during remission (7). Amino salicylates drugs are among the most commonly pharmacological therapy used for both inducing and maintaining of remission in patients with mild-moderate IBD (6). Corticosteroids are used mainly as “rescue” therapy for patients experiencing flare of the disease (8). Immunosuppresants (e.g., azathioprine) are used to maintain remission in both forms of IBD (9). Several biological agents are currently available (e.g., infliximab) to treat IBD patients (10). The patients usually weigh the benefits of drugs against its potential risks (11). Accordingly, two medication beliefs categories were proposed by Horne et al, i.e., necessities and concerns. Patients can have concerns about the possible unwanted harmful long-term effects as well as dependence on their medication (12) whereas necessity beliefs are related to the expected beneficial effects of a drug on health (13). Accordingly, taking patient’s beliefs about the prescribed medication in consideration had been shown to an important factor that affects compliance of the patient where having positive beliefs is a prerequisite for better compliance (14-16). To measure beliefs about medicines, the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) was developed by Horne et al (17). The aim of the current study was to investigate and assess beliefs about medicines among a sample of Iraqi patients with inflammatory bowel disease and to determine possible association between this belief and some patient-specific factors. Patients and Method Patients The current cross-sectional study was carried out on 150 already diagnosed IBD patients who attended the Gastroenterology and Hepatology Teaching Hospital/Medical City/Baghdad during September 2017 till January 2018. The mean age of the patients was (31.7 ± 11.4 years). The number of UC patients was 74 (49.3%) while the number of CD patients was 76 (50.7%). Inclusion criteria The inclusion criteria for the current study were: 1-IBD patients who are aged 18 years or more of either sex. 2-Disease duration of 6 months or more. 3-Patients are taking at least one drug on regular base. 4-Patients have not changed their drugs on the last three month. 5-Patients should be able to communicate effectively and willing to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria The exclusion criteria for this study were: 1-Patient who had speech, hearing, or cognitive deficits that would affect their understanding of the questions. 2-Patient being on treatment for any psychological or neurological diseases. 3-If they were receiving no drug. 4-Patients providing conflicting or incomplete information also excluded. Method The questionnaires In the current study, belief about medicines was measured using the Arabic version (18) of the beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ) developed by Horne et al (17) (figure-1). The BMQ includes two parts; general and specific. The specific part evaluates patients’ beliefs about medications given for a specific disease and in turn, it contain two subparts; specific necessity of prescribed drugs for a particular disease (5 statements) and specific concern about the potential adverse unwanted consequences of drugs (5 statements). The general part of the BMQ is about beliefs about medicines in general and also contains two subparts, the general overuse part about the way in which drugs are prescribed by the doctors (4 statements) and the general harm part which evaluates the degree to which patients perceive drugs as harmful. Patients answered each question in subparts using a 5-point likert scale, where: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = uncertain, 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree. Thus, points of each question are summed to give the score. Higher specific necessity scores indicate stronger personal need for the drugs. Higher specific concerns scores indicate stronger concerns about the adverse effects of the drugs. Higher scores on the general harm part indicate more negative views about drugs Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.27(2) 2018 Belief about medications in IBD 34 as a whole while higher scores on the general overuse part indicate more negative views about the way in which drugs are prescribed and that they are overused by doctors (18). Figure 1.The beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ) (17). Study design The pilot study A pilot study was carried out on ten IBD patients to test and optimize the Arabic words of the questionnaires used in the current study, the data obtained from this study was not included in the major study. Strongly disagree Disagree Uncertain Agree Strongly agree Specific necessity 1-My life would be impossible without medicine 2-Without medicine I'll be very ill 3-My health , at present depend on my medicine 4-My medicine protected me from becoming worse 5-My health in the future depends on my medicine Specific concern 6-I sometimes worry about the long term effect of my medicine 7-Having to take medicine scares me 8-I sometimes worry about becoming too dependent on my medicine 9-My medicine disrupt my life 10-My medicines are mystery to me General-Harm 11-People who take medicines should stop their treatment for a while every now and again 12-Most medicines are addictive 13-Medicines do more harm than good 14-All medicines are poison General-Overuse 15-Natural remedies are safer than medicines 16-Doctors use too many medicines 17-Doctors place too much trust on medicines 18-If doctors had more time with their patients they would prescribe fewer medicines Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.27(2) 2018 Belief about medications in IBD 35 Administration of question ِ naires The data related to the study were collected by the researcher . When the patients arrived to the hospital to receive their programmed doses of biological agent, they were asked if they accept to participate in the study, a complete explanation to the questions in the questionnaire was done and each patient spent about 5 minutes to fill the research questionnaire completely . Statistical analysis. Discrete variables presented using their number and percentage, chi square test used to analyze the discrete variable. Two samples t- test used to analyze the differences in means between two groups (if both follow normal distribution with no significant outlier). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odd ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals. Linear regression analysis performed to assess the relationship between different variables, if one or both of them follow normal distribution Person regression used but if both did not follow normal distribution Spearman correlation will used. Negative sign indicate inverse relationship, but positive sign represent direct relationship. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0.0 (Chicago, IL), MedCalc Statistical Software version 14.8.1 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium; 2014), and GraphPad Prism 7.0 software package were used to make the statistical analysis, P value considered when appropriate to be significant if less than 0.05. Results Smoking was significantly higher in patients with CD compared to the UC. Also the frequency of rural was significantly higher in patients with UC compared to CD, and the rest of the variables did not show a significant difference between CD and UC as illustrated in table 1. Table 1. Comparison of socio-demographic between both types of IBD Variables Ulcerative colitis Crohn's disease p-value Number 74 76 - Age (years), mean ± SD 32.2 ± 10.9 31.2 ± 12.0 a0.602 <20 years 9 (12.2%) 12 (15.8%) b0.877 20 – 29 years 26 (35.1%) 28 (36.8%) 30 – 39 years 23 (31.1%) 18 (23.7%) 40 – 49 years 9 (12.2%) 10 (13.2%) 50 – 60 years 7 (9.5%) 8 (10.5%) Gender, no. (%) Female 34 (45.9%) 30 (39.5%) b0.509 Male 40 (54.1%) 46 (60.5%) Social status, no. (%) Single 29 (39.2%) 42 (55.3%) c0.052 Married 45 (60.8%) 34 (44.7%) Education level, no. (%) Illiterate 1 (1.4%) 1 (1.3%) d0.902 Primary 16 (21.6%) 14 (18.4%) Secondary 28 (37.8%) 27 (35.5%) College 29 (39.2%) 34 (44.7%) Residence, no. (%) Urban 58 (78.4%) 71 (93.4%) b0.008 Rural 16 (21.6%) 5 (6.6%) Smoking, no. (%) 3 (4.1%) 11 (14.5%) b0.028 Drinker, no. (%) 0 (0%) 1 (1.3%) c1.0 a: independent t-test, b: chi-square test, c: Fisher exact test, d: Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test The duration of disease was significantly longer in patients with UC compared to CD, the frequency of patients with active disease was significantly higher in patients with UC, the frequency of patients had surgical treatment was higher in patients with CD, and the frequency of patients treated in out-patients setting was higher in the CD as illustrated in table 2. The total score with the sub-scores of patients believes for all patients are shown in table 3 as well as figure 1. Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.27(2) 2018 Belief about medications in IBD 36 Table 2. Comparison of disease haracteristics between both types of IBD The total score with the sub-scores of patients believes for all patients are shown in table 3 as well as figure 1. Table 3. Patients believes scores for all patients Variables Value Patients believes Specific necessity score, mean ± SD (range) 19.23 ± 5.21 (5 -25) Specific concern score, mean ± SD (range) 14.95 ± 6.60 (5 - 25) General harm score, mean ± SD (range) 9.90 ± 3.35 (4 - 20) General overuse score, mean ± SD (range) 10.22 ± 3.30 (4 - 18) Total score, mean ± SD (range) 54.30 ± 9.61 (31 -80) Figure 1. Belief about medications for all patients Regarding the components of BMQ, all the components are not statistically different between CD and UC, as illustrated in table 4. Table 4. Patients believes scores for each disease Variables Ulcerative colitis Crohn's disease p-value Number 74 76 - Patients believes Specific necessity score, mean ± SD 19.58 ± 4.87 18.89 ± 5.53 a0.421 Specific concern score, mean ± SD 15.30 ± 6.63 14.61 ± 6.59 a0.523 General harm score, mean ± SD 9.81 ± 3.06 9.99 ± 3.62 a0.748 General overuse score, mean ± SD 9.69 ± 3.10 10.74 ± 3.43 a0.052 Total score, mean ± SD 54.38 ± 10.14 54.22 ± 9.13 a0.922 : chi square testbtest, -: independent ta Variables Ulcerative colitis Crohn's disease p-value Disease duration (years), mean ± SD 5.88 ± 4.66 4.16 ± 3.98 a0.017 Disease activity, no. (%) Remission 43 (58.1%) 60 (78.9%) b0.006 Active 31 (41.9%) 16 (21.1%) Surgical treatment, no. (%) 6 (8.1%) 19 (25.0%) b0.006 The Number of chronic drugs, no. (%) Single medication 31 (41.9%) 32 (42.1%) b0.979 Multiple medications 43 (58.1%) 44 (57.9%) The Number of chronic diseases, no. (%) No disease 71 (95.9%) 71 (93.4%) c0.609 Single disease 3 (4.1%) 3 (3.9%) Multiple disease 0 (0.0%) 2 (2.6%) Admission, no. (%) In-patients 17 (23.0%) 5 (6.6%) b0.005 Out-patients 57 (77.0%) 71 (93.4%) Doses of infliximab, mean ± SD 7.15 ± 6.53 7.95 ± 6.39 a 0.450 a: independent t-test, b: chi-square test, c: Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.27(2) 2018 Belief about medications in IBD 37 The majority of the patients (58%) had strong beliefs in the necessity of treatment (scores BMQ specific-necessity greater than score BMQ specific-concern). However, (22%) of the patients reported strong concerns about the treatment (scores BMQ specific-concern greater than score BMQ specific-necessity).The remaining of the patients (20%), have equal scores for BMQ specific-necessity and specific- concern scores (Table 5) suggests that they have an equal agreement on both concept of the subpart where they share the same score. There was significant inverse correlation between gender (male vs. female) and specific concern score, while significant direct correlation was present between smoking and general overuse score, number of infliximab doses directly correlated with specific necessity score and inversely correlated with specific concern score, number of drugs used directly correlated with both specific concern and general harm scores for all patients as illustrated in table 6. Table 5. BMQ necessity-concern differential Table 6. Linear regression analysis between BMQ components and other variables for all patients Variables Specific necessity Specific concern General harm General- Overuse r P-value r P- value r P- value r P- value Gender 0.127 0.121 -0.198 0.015 -0.058 0.479 0.082 0.317 Age 0.075 0.362 0.051 0.536 -0.052 0.525 -0.020 0.812 Disease duration 0.065 0.428 -0.041 0.619 -0.092 0.263 -0.066 0.419 Disease (CD vs. UC) -0.066 0.421 -0.053 0.523 0.026 0.748 0.159 0.052 Disease activity -0.047 0.568 0.093 0.258 -0.010 0.904 -0.080 0.330 Social status (married) 0.089 0.279 0.021 0.801 -0.016 0.842 0.003 0.976 Education level -0.091 0.266 -0.018 0.823 -0.103 0.210 -0.080 0.332 Residence(rural) -0.011 0.896 -0.043 0.597 -0.051 0.533 0.014 0.866 Smoking 0.003 0.969 -0.140 0.087 -0.107 0.192 0.201 0.013 Surgical Treatment -0.103 0.210 0.091 0.270 -0.083 0.312 0.052 0.530 Number of drugs used -0.053 0.521 0.199 0.014 0.218 0.007 0.107 0.194 Number of chronic disease -0.053 0.518 0.094 0.254 0.067 0.415 0.046 0.574 Place of management (out-patients) -0.094 0.253 -0.009 0.912 -0.075 0.364 -0.041 0.618 Doses of infliximab 0.188 0.021 -0.214 0.008 -0.146 0.075 0.015 0.855 The number of drugs used was directly correlated with specific concern score also number of chronic diseases directly correlated with general overuse score in UC patients, as illustrated in table 7. Necessity – concern differential N Percentage Necessity > concern 87 58.0 Concern > necessity 33 22.0 Necessity = concern 30 20.0 Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.27(2) 2018 Belief about medications in IBD 38 Table 7. Linear regression analysis between BMQ components and other variables for UC patients Variables Specific necessity Specific concern General harm General- Overuse r P-value r P-value r P- value r P- value Gender 0.105 0.372 -0.172 0.142 -0.039 0.738 0.101 0.393 Age 0.086 0.466 -0.085 0.474 -0.044 0.708 0.031 0.791 Disease duration 0.105 0.374 -0.053 0.654 -0.148 0.209 0.008 0.948 Disease activity -0.176 0.134 0.120 0.310 -0.001 0.992 -0.039 0.743 Social status (married) -0.012 0.917 0.028 0.814 0.050 0.671 0.072 0.543 Education level -0.029 0.804 -0.019 0.875 -0.055 0.641 -0.085 0.469 Residence (rural) -0.151 0.198 0.046 0.697 0.022 0.853 0.096 0.418 Smoking 0.004 0.975 -0.176 0.134 -0.077 0.513 -0.046 0.697 Surgical Treatment -0.025 0.829 -0.081 0.492 0.035 0.769 -0.083 0.484 Number of drugs used 0.116 0.327 0.255 0.028 0.019 0.874 0.086 0.467 Number of chronic disease 0.160 0.174 0.095 0.422 -0.010 0.934 0.243 0.037 Place of management (out-patients) -0.087 0.460 -0.044 0.712 -0.203 0.083 -0.034 0.772 Doses of infliximab 0.166 0.158 -0.131 0.267 -0.017 0.885 -0.007 0.952 Residence (rural) inversely correlated with specific concern score, smoking was directly correlated with general overuse score, number of drugs used directly correlated with general harm score, number of infliximab doses inversely correlated with both specific concern and general harm scores in CD patients as illustrated in table 8. Table 8. Linear regression analysis between BMQ components and other variables for CD patients Variables Specific necessity Specific concern General harm General- Overuse r P- value r P- value r P-value r P- value Gender 0.156 0.178 -0.217 0.059 -0.078 0.504 0.048 0.679 Age 0.062 0.597 0.168 0.146 -0.057 0.627 -0.049 0.676 Disease duration 0.003 0.980 -0.052 0.657 -0.034 0.772 -0.083 0.477 Disease activity 0.051 0.662 0.041 0.725 -0.007 0.952 -0.055 0.638 Social status (married) 0.157 0.176 -0.002 0.984 -0.063 0.589 -0.008 0.944 Education level -0.139 0.230 -0.012 0.915 -0.147 0.206 -0.094 0.420 Residence(rural) 0.150 0.196 -0.227 0.048 -0.147 0.206 -0.011 0.927 Smoking 0.021 0.854 -0.118 0.310 -0.134 0.249 0.295 0.010 Surgical Treatment -0.127 0.273 0.225 0.051 -0.159 0.171 0.071 0.540 Number of drugs used -0.166 0.152 0.162 0.161 0.352 0.002 0.111 0.341 Number of chronic disease -0.144 0.213 0.108 0.355 0.100 0.389 -0.064 0.580 Place of management (out-patients) -0.082 0.479 0.081 0.485 0.073 0.531 -0.161 0.165 Doses of infliximab 0.217 0.060 -0.293 0.010 -0.259 0.024 0.016 0.888 Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.27(2) 2018 Belief about medications in IBD 39 Discussion Inflammatory bowel diseases, are chronic gastrointestinal conditions characterized by alternating episodes of symptom exacerbation and periods of general well-being. As in the majority of other chronic illnesses, lifelong therapy is required (19). It is a worldwide health-care problem with a continually increasing incidence (20). Regarding socio-demographic characteristics of patients involved in the current study, smoking was significantly higher in patients with CD (14.5%) compared to the UC (4.1%). Approximate to this result was found in study by (C. De Bie et al., 2015) where more CD patients were active smokers compared to UC (40% vs. 17%) (21). Smoking was found to increase the risk of developing CD but not UC (22). In addition, the frequency of rural UC patients (21.6%) was significantly higher compared to rural CD patients (6.6%) and this is in agreement with study by (Alireza T. S et al. 2013) where frequency of rural patients was higher in UC (13.6%) than CD (8.3%) (23). The rest of the socio-demographic variables did not show a significant difference between CD and UC as illustrated in table 1. With respect to disease characteristics, the duration of disease was significantly longer in patients with UC (5.88 ± 4.66 years) compared to CD (4.16 ± 3.98 years) which approximate the results reported by (I˙ lhami Y. et. al., 2009) study in Turkey where UC duration was longer than CD (24). This may be due to that it takes longer to diagnose CD than UC (25). The frequency of patients with active disease (relapsed) was significantly higher in patients with UC than in CD patients (41.9% vs. 21.1%) respectively. This result came opposite to that of (Weigert et. al., 2010) in which the frequency of ptients with active disease was (38.7%) for UC and (64%) for CD patients (26). The frequency of patients had surgical treatment was higher in patients with CD 25% compared with 8.1% for UC patients which is consistent with the result of other studies (Ozin et.al. 2009), that found surgical interventions were more common in CD (25). In addition, frequency of patients treated in out-patients setting was higher in CD patients which means that patients with CD may undergo less relapses or any other causes that lead to hospitalization and then CD patients usually treated as outpatients more than UC patients. Regarding the components of BMQ, all the components are not statistically different between CD and UC. The majority of the patients (58%) had strong beliefs in the necessity of their IBD treatment ( scores BMQ specific - necessity greater than score BMQ Specific-concern). This result came approximate to another study (Horne et al 2008) which state that (48%) of IBD patients were (high necessity, low concerns) (27). In its simplest form, where necessity beliefs outweigh concerns, the patient is likely to be adherent. In the present study (22%) of the patients reported strong concerns about the treatment (scores BMQ specific-concern greater than score BMQ specific-necessity). This group of patients was worried about the adverse effect of their prescribed IBD medications. These concerns about long-term effects of using IBD medications should be assessed and reduced by healthcare providers to improve medication intake. The current study showed that there was a significant inverse correlation between gender (male vs. female) and specific concern score that mean male patients have less specific concern about IBD medications than female patients. Other studies did not show any significant association between gender and BMQ sub scores (28, 29). In the present study, significant direct correlation was present between smoking and general overuse score. Smoking has seldom been studied to determine the association with BMQ sub scores (over use). Also, results of current study showed that the number of infliximab doses directly correlated with specific necessity score and inversely correlated with specific concern score (as number of infliximab doses increase the specific necessity score will increase and specific concern score will decrease). This result may be due to that biological agents are associated with a normalization in quality of life (QOL) for IBD patients (30), and this will increase the belief of patients about the specific necessity of infliximab. The number of drugs used directly correlated with both specific concern and general harm scores for all patients (table 6) , this result similar to the result of ( Konstantina Tsianou 2016) , where the number of drugs used correlated positively with the general harm sub score (29). A possible explanation of this result is that patients using high number of drugs surely will have high concerns about these drugs. In the current study, the number of chronic diseases directly correlated with general overuse score in UC patients (table-7); however, other study found that the number of chronic conditions did not correlate with any of the BMQ subs score (28). It seems that accumulation of diseases and/or medicines, has a positive impact on concern (31). Also the present study found that residence in rural areas in patients with CD inversely correlated with specific concern score that mean that patients who live in rural areas have less Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.27(2) 2018 Belief about medications in IBD 40 concern about their medication than patients who live in urban areas. A possible explanation could be lack of adequate education and/or lack of information to assist a greater understanding of medicines and their effects (31). Conclusions The majority (58%) of Iraqi IBD patients sample had strong beliefs in the necessity of their IBD treatment where the medication-necessity score was greater than medication-concern score with male patients had less specific concern about IBD medications than female patients. References 1. Walker AW, Sanderson JD, Churcher C, et al. High-throughput clone library analysis of the mucosa-associated microbiota reveals dysbiosis and differences between inflamed and non-inflamed regions of the intestine in inflammatory bowel disease. BMC microbiology. 2011; 11(1):1-12. 2. Shimshoni E, Yablecovitch D, Baram L,et al . ECM remodelling in IBD: innocent bystander or partner in crime? The emerging role of extracellular molecular events in sustaining intestinal inflammation. Gut. 2014; 21: gutjnl-2014:367-372. 3. Morgan XC, Tickle TL, Sokol H, et al. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiom:gutjnl e in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome biology. 2012; 13(9):1-18. 4. Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2014; 14(5):1-14. 5. Schaefer JS, Attumi T, Opekun AR, et al. MicroRNA signatures differentiate Crohn’s disease from ulcerative colitis. BMC immunology. 2015; 16(1):1-13. 6. Marie A. Chisholm- Burns. Pharmaco- therapy Principles and Practice. 4th edition 2016. p: 307-320 . 7. Bernstein CN, Fried M, Krabshuis JH, et al. World Gastroenterology Organization Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IBD in 2010. Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2010; 16(1):112-124. 8. Waljee AK, Wiitala WL, Govani S, et al. Corticosteroid use and complications in a US inflammatory bowel disease cohort. PloS one. 2016; 11(6):1-14. 9. Bernstein CN. Treatment of IBD: where we are and where we are going. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2015; 110(1):1- 13. 10. Danese S, Vuitton L and Peyrin-Biroulet L. Biologic agents for IBD: practical insights. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2015; 12(9):1-9. 11. Clarris S, Sunitha C, William T, et al. The role of insight into and beliefs about medicines of hypertensive patients. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2007 Nov-Dec; 18(6): 353–357. 12. Horne R, Weinman J. Self-regulation and self-management in asthma: exploring the role of illness perceptions and treatment beliefs in explaining nonadherence to preventer medication. Psychol Health. 1999; 14:1–24. 13. Sieta T, Joost C, Rosalie V, et al. Medication beliefs, treatment complexity, and non-adherence to different drug classes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2014; 76: 134– 138. 14. Rob H, Sarah C, Rhian P, et al. Understanding Patients’ Adherence-Related Beliefs about Medicines Prescribed for Long-Term Conditions: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework. Plos One. 2013; 8 (12): 1-24. 15. Mohamed M, Salmiah M, Mohd D. Beliefs and adherence to medicines among Malaysian malay type 2 diabetes. International Journal of Current Research. 2014; 6 (02):5026-5033. 16. James E, John D. Diabetic patients’ medication underuse, illness outcomes, and beliefs about antihyperglycemic and antihypertensive treatments. Diabetes care. 2009; 32(1): 19-24. 17. Horne R, Weinman J, Hankins M. The beliefs about medicines questionnaire: the development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychol Health. 1999; 14: 1–24. 18. Raniah M, Waleed M, Adham S , et al. Beliefs about medicines and self-reported adherence among patients with chronic illness: a study in palestine. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2014; 3 (3): 224-229. 19. D’inca R, Bertomoro P, Mazzocco K,et al. Risk factors for non‐adherence to medication in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2008; 27(2):166-72. 20. Zhang YZ, Li YY. Inflammatory bowel disease: pathogenesis. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2014; 20(1):91-99. 21. De Bie C, Ballet V, Hendriks N,et al. Smoking behaviour and knowledge of the health effects of smoking in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2015; 42(11- 12):1294-302. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Shiri%20C%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18092108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Srinivas%20SC%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18092108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Futter%20WT%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18092108 Iraqi J Pharm Sci, Vol.27(2) 2018 Belief about medications in IBD 41 22. Rosenfeld G, Bressler B. The truth about cigarette smoking and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease. The American Journal of Gastroenterology .2012; 107:1407 – 1408. 23. Taghavi SA, Safarpour AR, Hosseini SV,et al. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in Iran: a review of 740 patients in Fars Province, Southern Iran. Ann Colorectal Res. 2013; 1(1):17-22. 24. Yüksel I, Başar Ö, Ataseven H, et al. Mucocutaneous manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2008; 15(4):546-50. 25. Ozin Y, Kilic MZ, and Nadir I, et al.Clinical features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease in Turkey. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009; 18(2):157-62. 26. Weigert J, Obermeier F, Neumeier M,et al. Circulating levels of chemerin and adiponectin are higher in ulcerative colitis and chemerin is elevated in Crohn's disease. Inflammatory bowel diseases.2010; 16(4):630-7. 27. Horne R, Parham R, Driscoll R,et al. Patients' attitudes to medicines and adherence to maintenance treatment in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2008; 15(6):837-44. 28. Tsianos EV, Tsianou K, Tsipouras MG, et al. Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) in inflammatory bowel disease patients in Greece. Ιs this useful?. European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare. 2016; 4(1):187-95. 29. Tsianou K. Preliminary analysis of drug adherence of patient suffering with ulcerative colitis. (Diploma thesis) 2016. 30. Rocchi A, Benchimol EI, Bernstein CN,et al. Inflammatory bowel disease: a Canadian burden of illness review. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2012; 26(11):811-7. 31. Komninis ID, Micheli K, Roumeliotaki T,et al. Adaptation and validation of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) in primary care patients in Greece. European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare. 2013; 1(1):224-31.