Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal https://journal.iaimnumetrolampung.ac.id/index.php/igcj How to cite: Jusoh, A. J., Imami, M. K. W., Handrianto, C., Isa, A. N. M., Omar, S. Z., Abdullah, A., & Wahab, S. (2023). Verification of Reliability and Validity of a Malaysian Version of Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as Drug Prevention Scale. Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.25217/0020236369700 E-ISSN: 2614-1566 Published by: Institut Agama Islam Ma’arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung Verification the Reliability and Validity of a Malaysian Version of Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as Drug Prevention Scale Ahmad Jazimin Jusoh1*, Muh Khairul Wajedi Imami1, Ciptro Handrianto1, Ahmad Nazir Mohd Isa1, Siti Zobidah Omar2, Azizi Abdullah3, Suzaily Wahab3 1 Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia 2 UCSI University Malaysia, Malaysia 3 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia jazimin@fpm.upsi.edu.my* Article Information: Received April 6, 2023 Revised May 14, 2023 Accepted June 6, 2023 Keywords: drug prevention scale; rathus assertiveness schedule; validity reliability Abstract The aim of this research was to verify the Malaysian version of Rathus assertiveness as a drug prevention scale in secondary school students. The current research participants were 211 secondary students in Johor, Selangor, and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. An exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring and varimax rotation was performed for the initial analysis. After the eigenvalue emerged, the data was suppressed to .30 to display the factor loading. The value of commonalities and factor loading were considered to frame and locate the items in the scale structure. Furthermore, the reliability of the scale was tested through Cronbach's alpha. The result showed that nine factors emerged, explaining 58.721% of the variance. Four of the 30 items were eliminated from the analysis because they had commonalities below the threshold. The structure of the scale was as follows: seven items in the first factor, four items in the second factor, four items in the third factor, two items in the fourth factor, two items in the fifth factor, one item in the sixth factor, two items in the seventh factor, two items in the eight factors, and one item in the ninth factor. Furthermore, the reliability of the scale was .748. This research concluded that the scale was internally consistence measuring the secondary school student`s assertiveness in drug education. INTRODUCTION Assertiveness is related to personal expression or standing for their rights without denying the rights of others (Suzuki et al., 2007; Rathinasabapathy, 2022). Some researchers study the Rathus assertiveness schedule with drug abuse. Ganji et al. (2022) assess the assertiveness of drug abusers. They found that the drug addict sample was less assertive, less socially assertive, and more socially anxious compared to the non-addict sample. Collins (2012) compares the level of assertiveness between drug abusers and non-abusers. They found that drug users and non-drug users seemed to have the same level of assertiveness. Kocak et al. (2022) test the effect of empowerment training in protecting adolescents from drug abuse on an assertiveness level. The study found that empowerment training increased the level of assertiveness. Furthermore, a pilot study conducted by Horan et al. (1975) revealed that current and former drug users are less assertive than those who had experience with drug abuse but no longer do https://journal.iaimnumetrolampung.ac.id/index.php/igcj https://doi.org/10.25217/0020236369700 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9456-9462 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9456-9462 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5566-7468 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1695-0038 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-7787 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-8300 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3815-4489 Verification of Reliability and Validity of a Malaysian Version of Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as Drug Prevention Scale 2 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 so. That research claims a relationship between assertiveness and drug abusers, which indicates the level of assertiveness could be an indication of a drug abuser. An instrument that measures Rathus's assertiveness schedule related to drugs has not yet been validated. In the literature, we found Rathus assertiveness schedule scale validation related to sickle cell disease (Jenerette & Dixon, 2010), neurotics, schizophrenics, personality disorders (Rathus & Nevid, 1977), and alcoholics (Menon & Edward, 2014). The Rathus assertiveness scale related to the drug is essential as a research tool to gauge drug abuse and prevention information. Research proves the relationship between drugs and assertiveness. Ramadhan et al., (2019) depict that assertiveness training is practical for drug abuse prevention. It means increasing assertiveness could prevent adolescents from drug abuse behaviour. It is strengthened by Vancappel et al. (2023), who cited a positive correlation between drug abuse and assertiveness. Therefore, the validation of Rathus' assertiveness schedule as drug prevention is necessary. Furthermore, the psychometric analysis of Rathus's assertiveness schedule has not been verified in the Malaysian context. For example, (Suzuki et al., 2007) verified the reliability and validity of Rathu's assertiveness schedule in the Japanese context. Gustafson (1992) verifies the Rathus assertiveness schedule in the context of the Swedish sample. Dares (1981) verifies the Rathus assertiveness schedule in South African undergraduate students. Even though the scale has already been validated in certain regions, that does not mean it will work for all populations and purposes (Knekta et al., 2019). So, there is a need to test the scale in the Malaysian context to verify its use. Other than that, (Knekta et al., 2019) stated that the validity of the scale is time-sensitive and that the interpretation might be in line with cultural change. Furthermore, there is a need to validate Rathus's assertiveness schedule in the Malaysian context because Amat et al. (2021), through their need analysis reveal the need for the psychosocial module, which consists of assertiveness. Therefore, this research intends to validate the Malaysian version of the Rathus assertiveness schedule as a drug prevention scale. Providing a valid instrument for measuring secondary school students’ assertiveness is important. Secondary school is a critical risk period where students of this age are vulnerable to drug abuse (Likisa & Science, 2021). In this age, students are known to be in the age of growth, where they are exposed to new behaviours through their relationships with peers and society (Sotoudeh et al., 2021). They could be influenced by peers or their environment to consume drugs. Blair & Diamond (2008) stated that studenthood is a stage of development that is characterised by quick biological and social change, leading to significant age- and gender- dependent variation (Likisa & Science, 2021). Other than that, in this age, the student's vulnerability to drug abuse is also caused by external factors such as socioeconomic status, academic achievement (Shah et al., 2020), a lack of peer support at school, a lack of school discipline, and the students' sexual intercourse (Rodzlan Hasani et al., 2019). That is why concepting the drug prevention for secondary school are important, one of which is providing a valid tool to measure secondary school students’ assertiveness in drug education. A valid instrument will be the psychometric toll revealing the data on students assertiveness in drug education, which can be used to create more effective drug prevention strategies (Abd Elwahab El Sayed et al., 2019). Teachers or counsellors can use the information collected to frame or initiate an effective drug prevention programme for students. This is needed since the number of secondary school students abusing drugs in Malaysia is worrying. Wan Sulaiman et al., (2021) stated that drug addiction increased from 12.089 in 2017 to 12.520 in 2018. Other than that, the Malaysian National Anti-Drug Agency (AADK) reported that 42% of 2.188.525 were identified as being in a risky situation to consume drugs (Handrianto et al., 2020). Other than that, there is a tendency for secondary school students to use drug abuse as a coping strategy. Rom et al. (2023), in their research, found that secondary school students in Malaysia used drug abuse as their coping strategy for stress and depression release. Jusoh, A. J., Imami, M. K. W., Handrianto, C., Isa, A. N. M., Omar, S. Z., Abdullah, A., & Wahab, S. 3 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 Rationale of The Study In the literature, assertiveness is discussed as a construct. One of which is communication ability. Assertiveness is often discussed as a communication ability; it is a skill to reveal self- expression to others (Immanuel, 2019). Good communication skills can be sharpened through the assertiveness programme (Abdelaziz et al., 2020). Assertiveness is the ability to communicate one's needs, wants, and opinions while also considering and respecting those of others (Vagos & Pereira, 2019). Specifically, Ayhan & Seki Öz, (2021) explained that assertiveness refers to the act of expressing emotion, which can help individuals provide better service for themselves or others. Assertive feelings can encourage more genuine and intimate communication, be calm and assured in the face of criticism, and give others the chance to express their opinions by holding their ideas in tact (Bulantika et al., 2019). Through good communication, assertive people are able to maintain good relationships with others because they are able to appreciate others' feelings and opinions and exchange feelings and thoughts (Khairunnisa & Putri, 2019). Another construct linked with assertiveness is the courage to complain about others. Bulantika et al. (2019) stated that the courage to complain related to the inability to act assertively due to fear of disappointing others, fear of being disliked, and fear of not being accepted in the group. Having less assertiveness could endanger personal relationships with others, for example, when complaining about negative treatment, such as responding accurately to criticism and refusing requests to consume drugs (Vagos & Pereira, 2019). In this case, assertiveness is important to control one's feelings and emotions. A study conducted by Roshanzadeh et al. (2021) revealed that assertiveness is in line with courage in the concept of moral decision-making. It further revealed that assertive people can navigate and decide whether an action is morally acceptable or not. Other than that, assertiveness is also related to the construct of being confident. Bulantika et al. (2019) stated that the improvement of individual assertiveness is important to change perspective and action, which can improve self- confidence and look positive at every action taken. An example of being confident is being able to deal with personal limitations, such as asking for help and support when needed or refusing the demand when it comes to negative behaviours such as consuming drugs (Vagos & Pereira, 2019; Handrianto et al., 2021). However, the assertiveness scale has not yet been integrated with drug education. where the concept of assertiveness is very important to prevent students from developing drug consumption habits (Maulinsari & Purnama, 2022). Assertiveness is one of the behaviours that must be developed by students to hinder drug consumption habits (Fadli & Firman, 2019; Maulinsari & Purnama, 2022). Assertiveness is the behaviour of honestly expressing desire, feeling, and thought without offending others (Bulantika et al., 2019; Maulinsari & Purnama, 2022). It makes individuals have strong relationships with their social lives while still being able to stand by their principles (Maqbool Parray et al., 2020). Ramadhan et al. (2019) stated that strong ties of an individual with his social life, such as with parents and the school environment, become the protective factor for students against the use of drugs. Individuals with assertiveness will be able to say "no" to the demand for drug consumption without causing conflict in the rejection (Kazemi et al., 2019). In other words, assertiveness makes an individual respect themselves by standing against drug abuse while still being able to maintain a good relationship with others (Vagos & Pereira, 2019; Tatari et al., 2021). Therefore, introducing assertiveness to the students in drug education is necessary. Some researchers disclose a lack of research on assertiveness in drug prevention. For example, Bahramnejad et al. (2020) stated that information about psychosocial interventions such as assertiveness in drug education is very limited. Ramadhan et al. (2019) also stated that research to determine the effect of assertive training has never been done. The lack of assertiveness research in drug education might be caused by the lack of valid and reliable Verification of Reliability and Validity of a Malaysian Version of Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as Drug Prevention Scale 4 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 instruments to measure assertiveness in drug prevention. A valid instrument indicates that the instrument measures what it is intended to measure (Surucu & Maslakci, 2020; Ilhami et al., 2023). Therefore, providing a valid assertiveness instrument in drug education is needed to make sure the research on assertiveness in drug education is done correctly. Furthermore, the concept of assertiveness should be measured in each context in which it is applied. According to theory, assertiveness does not only develop and shape in accordance with genetic or cultural traits (Parmaksiz & Kiliçarslan, 2020). Rather, the concept of assertiveness is situationally sensitive (Gil-Llario et al., 2022). Students in drug education might have a different level of assertiveness compared to students who are not in drug education. Therefore, there is a need to test assertiveness in a specific context, such as drug education. Aim of the Study The aim of this research is to establish a valid and reliable assertiveness scale to be used in drug education. This involves examining the primary construct of assertiveness in drug education and validating the structure of the scale. The goal is to provide a tool to measure students assertiveness in drug education, which aims to improve the effectiveness of drug prevention programmes in schools. This scale can be used to measure the level of students' assertiveness during or after their participation in a drug education programme. Therefore, counsellors or teachers can have a bright perspective on the student's personality trait so they can take effective action or respond appropriately. METHODS Procedures of Study The Malaysian version of Rathus assertiveness schedule related to the drug abuse prevention scale consists of 30 items adopted. Every item used a 5-point scale. One indicates very much disagree, two indicate, three indicate agree, four indicate agree, and five indicate very much agree. Respondents were asked to select which was most relevant to the certain situation. The adopted scale was modified by researchers based on the literature review. The back-to-back translation was done by six experts. The scale was translated from English to Malaysian and translated back to English. Subject The purpose of this research is to validate the Malaysian Version of Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as Drug Prevention Scale in secondary school students in Malaysia. The researcher collected data in Johor, Selangor, and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. A total of 211 students participated in the current research. One hundred and ten of them were from Johor, 70 from Selangor, and 31 from Kuala Lumpur. Female students were dominant in the current research, where 86 participants were male and 125 were female. The researcher also gauges information about the participants' race since Malaysia has several races. One hundred eleven participants were Malay, 66 participants were Chinese, 19 participants were Indian, and five participants came from other races. The detail information about the participants can be seen in the table 1. Ethical Consideration As an ethical consideration for the current research, the researcher follows the relevant guidelines and procedures in collecting data. Professors Dr Rahmattullah Khan and Abdul Wahab Khan of the Human Research Ethics Committee at Sultan Idris Education University approved the permission of the ethics. The ethical consideration approval confirmed that the researcher paid attention to the respondents' rights and followed any required procedure with Jusoh, A. J., Imami, M. K. W., Handrianto, C., Isa, A. N. M., Omar, S. Z., Abdullah, A., & Wahab, S. 5 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 the permission number; UPSI/PPPI/PYK/ETIKA(M)/014(231). The researcher gives the questionnaires to respondents, followed by a notice that 1) The questionnaires did not intend to test the respondent's intelligence. 2) The purpose of the data collection was solely to contribute academically and as a contribution to knowledge. 3) The respondents hoped to answer the questionnaire honestly and sincerely. 4) all information obtained from this research was confidential and will not be distributed to any party. Data Analysis The construct validity of the scale was tested through factorial analysis (Sellbom & Tellegen, 2019). Knekta et al. (2019) explain that exploratory factor analysis could help researchers evolve theory because it explains the dimensionality of the instrument and helps to decide whether the item empirically belongs to the specific construct. In the current research, researchers employed exploratory factor analysis to evolve the existing factors and locate the items for each factor. In EFA, the discern variable was conceived as the weighted sum of potentially correlated factor variables and unique factors (Auerswald & Moshagen, 2019; Hafnidar et al., 2021). Eigenvalue was more significant than one, and a scree plot was used to retain the number of factors in this research. The theoretical consideration behind this is that an eigenvalue greater than 1 declares that the factor accounts for more variance in the observed data than any single variable in the dataset (Finch, 2020). SPSS 27.0 was used to perform EFA. In early analysis, the researchers set the principles axis factoring method, which was extracted with an eigenvalue greater than 1. The researchers also display the scree plot to interpret the eigenvalue through the diagram. Furthermore, varimax rotation was performed to help interpret the data easily. The data also suppress small coefficients up to .30 to display only items with factor loading greater than .30. Two considerations were considered for the current research: commonalities and factor loading. Almaleki (2021) stated that one of the major concerns in the factorial analysis was the minimum level of commonality to decide which indicator was adequate to represent a latent trait. Communality itself indicates the variable explained by the common factor (Shrestha, 2021). It estimates the percentage of the variance in the variable explained by all factors (Durosaro et al., 2019). The commonality ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating that the factor was not explained by the variance and 1 indicating that all the variance was explained by the factor (Almaleki, 2021). For the current research, the item with a commonality below .30 was eliminated from the analysis. Other than that, the researchers also considered the number of factors loaded; factor loading was related to the correlation of the items to the specific factor (De Roover & Vermunt, 2019). The criteria of factor loading explained by Yıldırım & Güler (2022) as poor (.32), fair (.45), good (.55), very good (.63), and excellent (.71). For the current research, factor loading was used to locate the item to the specific factor. Table 1. Data of participants of the study Sample N Percentages Region Johor 110 52.1% Selangor 70 33.2% Kuala Lumpur 31 14.7% Gender Male 86 40.8% Female 125 59.2% Races Malay 111 52.6% Chinese 66 31.3% Indian 29 13.7% Others 5 2.4% Verification of Reliability and Validity of a Malaysian Version of Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as Drug Prevention Scale 6 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Results This study analyzed data from 47 participants who completed the intervention and follow- up until the last session (see Figure 1 for participant flow). The participants were divided into three groups: mindfulness dhikr breathing (MDB) treatment group (n=17), progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) treatment group (n=12), and control group (n=18) (Table 1). Some participants were excluded from the study due to reasons such as the use of medication for insomnia, incomplete screening, not receiving the MDB or PMR treatment, discontinuing the PMR treatment due to COVID-19 symptoms, or discontinuing the control treatment. The response was collected from 211 students, with a response rate of 100%. In the current research, respondent complete answers regarding the region, gender, race, and 30 items of the Rathus assertiveness schedule as drug prevention. The initial analysis split the respondents based on gender, with 86 males and 125 females. Table 2 shows this group's average value of the Rathus assertiveness schedule as a drug prevention scale. The average score for all respondents was 3.20, with a standard deviation of .347. Female respondents have a higher mean score compared to male respondents. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated on the questionnaires' total scores for even and odd numbered items. The data was significantly correlated; the correlation coefficient was .539. Furthermore, the Cronbach alpha coefficient was also calculated; Cronbach alpha was .748 for all respondents, .655 for males and .789 for females, see table 2. Factor Analysis Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Barlett's test of sphericity was executed to test the appropriateness of the data for factor analysis. The result of KMO and bartlett's test confirms that the data was sufficient for factorial analysis. The result of KMO was .775, indicating the threshold of .5. Furthermore, the result of Barlett's test was significant, see tabel 3. A factor analysis was conducted for 30 items in the SPSS 27.0 application. The principle’s axis factoring rotated with varimax rotation, and the coefficient was settled to .30 was settled. Data analysis through 211 participants reveals nine factors with an eigenvalue exceeding 1.0. The total contribution ratio of the nine factors was 58.721% of the variance. The eigenvalue of each factor was 5.396 for the first factor, 3.036 for the second factor, 1.726 for the third factor, 1.478 for the fourth factor, 1.304 for the fifth factor, 1.288 for the sixth factor, 1.204 for the seventh factor, 1.133 for the eighth factor, and 1.052 for the ninth factor. The complete data of the factor can be seen in table 4. Table 2. Drug prevention scale Rathus assertiveness scale Sex No of subject Mean points SD Minimum points Maximum points Cronbach Alpha Male 86 3.1554 .30122 2.50 3.90 .655 female 125 3.2368 .37306 2.33 4.30 .789 Total 211 3.2036 .34715 2.33 4.30 .748 Table 3. KMO and Bartlett's Test Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square df Sig. .776 1543.728 435 .000 Jusoh, A. J., Imami, M. K. W., Handrianto, C., Isa, A. N. M., Omar, S. Z., Abdullah, A., & Wahab, S. 7 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 Furthermore, the number of eigenvalues was confirmed through the Scree plot. In the diagram, nine items exceed the standard of 1. The scree plot confirmed nine factors in the current data set. Figure 1. Scree Plot Table 4. Total Variance Factor Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative % 1 5.396 17.986 17.986 4.835 16.116 16.116 2 3.036 10.121 28.107 2.465 8.218 24.334 3 1.726 5.752 33.859 1.129 3.762 28.096 4 1.478 4.927 38.786 .924 3.079 31.176 5 1.304 4.345 43.131 .802 2.675 33.851 6 1.288 4.292 47.423 .748 2.493 36.343 7 1.204 4.015 51.438 .617 2.055 38.398 8 1.133 3.777 55.215 .517 1.724 40.122 9 1.052 3.506 58.721 .454 1.515 41.637 10 .925 3.083 61.804 11 .903 3.011 64.815 12 .851 2.836 67.651 13 .792 2.640 70.291 14 .784 2.612 72.903 15 .750 2.501 75.404 16 .710 2.367 77.771 17 .679 2.264 80.035 18 .667 2.224 82.259 19 .654 2.182 84.441 20 .585 1.951 86.392 21 .523 1.743 88.135 22 .505 1.685 89.820 23 .483 1.609 91.429 24 .438 1.459 92.888 25 .427 1.424 94.312 26 .406 1.354 95.667 27 .383 1.278 96.945 28 .340 1.135 98.080 29 .303 1.009 99.089 30 .273 .911 100.000 Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring Verification of Reliability and Validity of a Malaysian Version of Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as Drug Prevention Scale 8 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 Commonalities portray the proportion of the variance explained by the common factor, and factor loading portrays which factor the items correlated with. Table 5 reveals the value of factor loading and commonalities; the finding reveals that several items did not achieve the commonalities threshold of 0.3 (X12, X14, X27, and X28). Furthermore, the factor loading indicates which factor the item was correlated with. The result showed that there were seven items in the first factor with factor loading ranging from .308 to .667, there were four items in the second factor with factor loading ranging from .420to .506, there were four items in the third factor with factor loading ranged from .304 to .714, there were two items in the fourth factor with factor loading ranged from .571 to 669, there were two items in the fifth factor with factor loading ranged from .372 to .536, there was one item in the sixth factor with factor loading .780, there were two items in the seventh factor with factor loading .343 and .525, there were two items in the eighth factor with factor loading .523 and .470 and one item in the ninth factor with factor loading.404. Table 5. Factor loading and commonalities Items Extracted factor Communalities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1. Most people seem to be more aggressive and assertive than I am .780 .649 2. I have hesitated to join in a community because of “shyness .562 .474 3. When my friends in school doing bad things, I complain about it to the teachers .571 .452 4. I am careful to avoid hurting other people’s feelings, even when I feel that I have been injured .372 .360 5. If my friends have gone to considerable trouble to show me behaviour that is not quite suitable, I have a difficult time saying “No.” .461 .377 6. When someone told me about drug cases, I insist upon knowing why .536 .406 7. There are times when I look for a good, vigorous argument in drug discussion. .343 .330 8. I strive to get ahead as well as most people in my position .525 .307 9. To be honest, people often take advantage of me. .404 .324 10. I enjoy starting conversations about drug .608 .416 11. I often don't know what to say to people who consume drug. .633 .486 Jusoh, A. J., Imami, M. K. W., Handrianto, C., Isa, A. N. M., Omar, S. Z., Abdullah, A., & Wahab, S. 9 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 12. I will hesitate to make phone calls to talk about drug cases .214 13. I would rather apply for a job or for admission to a college by writing letters than by going through with personal interviews .506 .456 14. I find it embarrassing to return merchandise .420 .297 15. If a close and respected relative were annoying me, I would smother my feelings rather than express my annoyance .461 .524 16. I have avoided asking questions about drug for fear of sounding stupid .581 .505 17. During an argument, I am sometimes afraid that I will get so upset that I will shake all over .667 .497 18. If a famed and respected lecturer makes a comment which I think is incorrect about drug, I will have the audience hear my point of view as well .523 .405 19. I avoid arguing about drug with people who drug addict .447 .326 20. When I have done something important or worthwhile, I manage to let others know about it .470 .485 21. I am open and frank about my feelings .493 .424 22. If someone has been spreading false and bad stories about me, I see him or her as soon as possible and “have a talk” about it .304 .519 23. I often have a hard time saying “No.” to drug .403 .421 24. I tend to bottle up my emotions rather than make a scene .398 25. I will complain my teacher if my friends try to consume drug .669 .508 26. When I am asked to consume drug, I sometimes just don't know what to say .308 .434 27. If a couple near me in a force someone to consume drug I would ask them stop and quit .428 .228 Verification of Reliability and Validity of a Malaysian Version of Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as Drug Prevention Scale 10 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 28. Anyone attempting to push ahead of me in a line is in for a good battle .423 .254 29. I am quick to express an opinion regarding of drug .714 .617 30. There are times when I just can't say anything .555 .400 The researcher then named the factors that describe the items. The first factor consists of seven items named “inability to express feeling”, the second factor consists of four items named “lack of self-confidence”, the third factor consists of four items named “strong self-confidence”, the fourth factor consists of two items named as “the courage to complain”, the fifth factor consists of two items named “disregard to own feeling”, the sixth factor consists of one item named “aggressive”, the seventh factor consists of two items named “endeavour”, the eighth factor consists of two items named “expressing thought and values”, and the ninth factor consists of one item named “used by other”. Discussion The validity and reliability of the Rathus assertiveness schedule as a drug prevention scale were verified through 211 secondary school students in Malaysia. The scale attained high reproducibility in the current research, as proved by a high correlation coefficient (r = .539). Furthermore, the Cronbach alpha coefficient score for all respondents was .748. Schrepp (2020) defines the thresholds of Cronbach alpha as follows; > .9 (excellent), > .8 (good), > .7 (acceptable), > .6 (questionable), > .5 (poor), and < .5 (not acceptable). Reflecting the threshold given, the internal consistency of the current scale was acceptable. Testing the reliability of a scale is essential to finding scale consistency. In this case, Cronbach's alpha helps to measure the internal consistency of the scale. It helps to prove that the scale measures the different aspects of the same attribute (Adeniran, 2019). Amirrudin & Nasution (2021) stated that a high Cronbach alpha indicates that the items have similar covariance, which can measure the same concept. Many researchers utilize Cronbach's alpha as a method to test the reliability of a scale. For example, Schrep (2020) tested the reliability of the UX scale using Cronbach Alpha, Ramdan (2019) tested the reliability of the Indonesian version of the Hamilton anxiety scale using Cronbach Alpha, and Crandall et al. (2020) tested the reliability of the family health scale using Cronbach Alpha. Several eigenvalues more significant than one are essential for the current research (Fan et al., 2022; Husin et al., 2023). Most extraction methods rely on eigenvalues to decide the number of factors in the analysis (Auerswald & Moshagen, 2019). There were nine factors with an eigenvalue greater than 1 in this research. The first and second factors, namely "inability to express feelings" and "lack of self-confidence," had the highest eigenvalues (5.396 and 3.036). Their research stated that teenagers could not act assertively because they feared being disliked, disappointing others, and not being accepted in the group. Fear leads teenagers to limit themselves in their environmental interactions, resulting in an inability to express feelings and a lack of self-confidence (Bulantika et al., 2019; Zainil et al., 2023). Besides that, Ismail et al. (2020) stated that assertive behaviour is the key to enhancing life quality and communication. Research by Emeliya Natasha Bt Mohd Noor et al. (2022) reveals that there are two reasons Malaysian lack the ability to communicate or express feelings: anxiety and a lack of confidence. This research revealed that a lack of self-confidence makes students afraid to involve in the community (X2). Furthermore, the lack of communication skills prevents them from advising drug abusers (X11), they inability to reject the invitation to consume drugs (X23), and the cannot argue when being asked to consume drugs (X26). Emeliya Natasha Bt Mohd Noor et al. (2022) add that the individual's inability to assertive communication could make Jusoh, A. J., Imami, M. K. W., Handrianto, C., Isa, A. N. M., Omar, S. Z., Abdullah, A., & Wahab, S. 11 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 them talk too much without making strong statements or argumentation (Ang, 2016). His research revealed that many Malaysian students were not assertive, meaning they lacked social skills such as a low level of effective communication. That is why the first and second factors have high factor loading in this research. Research conducted by Chie et al. (2015) in Malaysia reveal that assertiveness could make the Student more independent and logical in rejecting peer influence to consume the drug. However, assertiveness learning should be followed by instilling self-confidence. Tymes et al. (2016) found that students lacking social confidence in risky situations engage in deviant behaviours such as drug abuse. The lack of self-confidence will make students prone to being led and influenced by peers and others, resulting in uncontrollable action (Chie et al., 2015; Nengsih et al., 2022). This research proved that the lack of self-confidence prevents students from learning about the drug because of their fear of seeming stupid (X16) and their inability to prevent their peers and themselves because they did not dare argue against drug abusers (X19). Mustapha et al. (2020) suggest three strategies for drug prevention in Malaysia: inculcating trust, building motivating, and enhancing self-confidence. Implications The result of this research is expected to have theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, this research contributes to the psychometric discussion on the assertiveness concept, where assertiveness in drug education consists of nine factors: inability to express feelings, lack of self-confidence, strong self-confidence, the courage to complain, disregard for one's own feelings, aggression, endeavour, expressing thoughts and values, and being used by others. Furthermore, practically, the result of this research can be used to measure the student`s assertiveness in drug education and to initiate an effective drug prevention programme in school. Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research There are several limitations and suggestions for future research. Firstly, the number of participants is limited to 211 secondary school students in Malaysia; more participants are needed to have more accurate instrument testing in Malaysia. Secondly, this research only employs one factorial analysis, namely exploratory factor analysis (EFA), which only measures the initial structure of the instrument; future research suggests employing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm the structure of the instrument. Other validation procedures, such as RASCH analysis of convergent and divergent validity, can also be used to strengthen the validity and reliability of the instrument. CONCLUSION The purpose of this research was to determine whether or not the Malaysian version of the Rathus assertiveness schedule was a valid scale for evaluating drug prevention. The data demonstrated that they could be relied upon for factorial analysis. Exploratory factor analysis, considering eigenvalues, commonalities, and factor loadings, was utilized to validate the scale structure. The eigenvalue revealed nine different factors; the similarities between the items indicate that four should be removed, and the factor loadings point to the structure of the items in the scale. The structure of the scale can be broken down as follows: the first factor includes seven items, the second factor includes four items, the third factor includes four items, the fourth factor includes two items, the fifth factor includes two items, the sixth factor includes one item, the seventh factor includes two items, the eighth factor includes two items, and the ninth factor includes one item. In addition, the scale was shown to be reliable by the Cronbach alpha, which gave it a score of .748. Verification of Reliability and Validity of a Malaysian Version of Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as Drug Prevention Scale 12 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 ACKNOWLEGMENT This research was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia through Long Term Research Grant Scheme (LRGS/1/2019/UKM/02/2/4), with the project title "Developing and conceptualizing a model of drug-free school environment prevention strategy at selected hot spots" (grant number: 2019025610742). We would like to express our gratitude to the editorial team and reviewers who spent their priceless time reviewing and improving this article. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION STATEMENT Conceptualization, AJJ and MKWI; methodology, CH and ANMI; data analysis, SZO; writing—review and editing, AA and SW. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. REFERENCES Abd Elwahab El Sayed, H., Abd El Sattar Ali, R., Mohamed Ahmed, F., & Fathy Mohy, H. (2019). The effect of life skills intervention on social self efficacy for prevention of drug abuse among young adolescent students at Benha city. American Journal of Nursing Science, 8(5), 263. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20190805.19 Abdelaziz, E. M., Diab, I. A., Ouda, M. M. A., Elsharkawy, N. B., & Abdelkader, F. A. (2020). The effectiveness of assertiveness training program on psychological wellbeing and work engagement among novice psychiatric nurses. Nursing Forum, 55(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12430 Adeniran, A. O. (2019). Application of likert scale’s type and cronbach’s alpha analysis in an airport perception study. Scholar Journal of Applied Sciences and Research, 2(4), 1–5. Google Scholar Almaleki, D. (2021a). Stability of the data-model fit over increasing levels of factorial invariance for different features of design in factor analysis. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 11(2), 6849–6856. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4047 Almaleki, D. (2021b). The precision of the overall data-model fit for different design features in confirmatory factor analysis. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 11(1), 6766–6774. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4025 Amat, S., Samsudin, H. I., Bakar, A. Y. A., Mahmud, M. I., & Kamarulzaman, M. H. (2021). Needs analysis of psychosocial module development based on psychoeducation approach for public university students in Malaysia. Education Sciences, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100604 Amirrudin, M., & Nasution, K. (2021). Effect of variability on cronbach alpha reliability in research practice. Jurnal Matematika, Statistika dan Komputasi, 17(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.20956/jmsk.v17i2.11655 Ang, C.-S. (2016). Assessment of social competence: Exploring the dimension of young adult social competence. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 30(1), 90–101. Google Scholar Auerswald, M., & Moshagen, M. (2019). How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions. Psychological Methods, 24(4), 468–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000200 Ayhan, D., & Seki Öz, H. (2021). Effect of assertiveness training on the nursing students’ assertiveness and self-esteem levels: Application of hybrid education in COVID-19 pandemic. Nursing Forum, 56(4), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12610 Bahramnejad, A., Iranpour, A., Karamoozian, A., & Nakhaee, N. (2020). Universal school- based intervention for increasing resilience, and its effect on substance use. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105378 Blair, C., & Diamond, A. (2008). Biological processes in prevention and intervention: The https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20190805.19 https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12430 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Adeniran%2C+A.+O.+%282019%29.+Application+of+Likert+Scale%E2%80%99s+Type+and+Cronbach%E2%80%99s+Alpha+Analysis+in+an+Airport+Perception+Study.+Scholar+Journal+of+Applied+Sciences+and+Research%2C+2%284%29%2C+1%E2%80%935.&btnG= https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4047 https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4025 https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100604 https://doi.org/10.20956/jmsk.v17i2.11655 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Ang%2C+C.-S.+%282016%29.+Assessment+of+social+competence%3A+Exploring+the+dimension+of+young+adult+social+competence.+Jurnal+Psikologi+Malaysia%2C+30%281%29%2C+90%E2%80%93101.&btnG= https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000200 https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12610 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105378 Jusoh, A. J., Imami, M. K. W., Handrianto, C., Isa, A. N. M., Omar, S. Z., Abdullah, A., & Wahab, S. 13 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Development and Psychopathology, 20(3), 899–911. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000436 Bulantika, S. Z., & Sari, P. (2019). The effectiveness of assertive training techniques and thought-stopping techniques to increase student assertiveness ability. Biblio Couns : Jurnal Kajian Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 2(3), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.30596/bibliocouns.v2i3.3736 Chie, Q. T., Tam, C. L., Bonn, G., Wong, C. P., Dang, H. M., & Khairuddin, R. (2015). Drug abuse, relapse, and prevention education in Malaysia: Perspective of university students through a mixed methods approach. In Frontiers in Psychiatry (Vol. 6, Issue MAY, p. 6). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00065 Collins, J. J. (2012). Assertiveness and self-esteem: Substance abusers. Google Scholar Crandall, A. A., Weiss-Laxer, N. S., Broadbent, E., Holmes, E. K., Magnusson, B. M., Okano, L., Berge, J. M., Barnes, M. D., Hanson, C. L., Jones, B. L., & Novilla, L. B. (2020). The Family health scale: Reliability and validity of a short- and long-form. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.587125 Dares, A. E. (1981). A preliminary validity study of the Rathus Assertiveness Schedule with a sample of the South African university population. Google Scholar De Roover, K., & Vermunt, J. K. (2019). On the exploratory road to unraveling factor loading non-invariance: A new multigroup rotation approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 26(6), 905–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1590778 Durosaro, S. O., Ilori, B., Ajani, A. O., & Ozoje, M. O. (2019). Description of body conformation of Nigerian Indigenous Turkeys using exploratory factor analysis. Nigerian Journal of Animal Science, 21(2), 30–38. Google Scholar Emeliya Natasha Bt Mohd Noor, N., Shah Bandar Indera Mahkota, A., Soo Foon, M., & Shah Bandar, A. (2022). Factors affecting the communication skills amongst the undergraduate medical imaging students at the international islamic university malaysia (IIUM) Kuantan, Pahang. International Journal of Allied Health Sciences, 6(2), 2618–2624. Google Scholar Fan, J., Guo, J., & Zheng, S. (2022). Estimating number of factors by adjusted eigenvalues thresholding. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 117(538), 852–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2020.1825448 Finch, W. H. (2020). Using fit statistic differences to determine the optimal number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419865769 Ganji, F., Khani, F., Karimi, Z., & Rabiei, L. (2022). Effect of assertiveness program on the drug use tendency, mental health, and quality of life in clinical students of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_107_21 Gil-Llario, M. D., Fernández-García, O., Gil-Juliá, B., Estruch-García, V., & Ballester-Arnal, R. (2022). Development and psychometric properties of an instrument for the assessment of assertiveness in sexual relations. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 19(3), 1255– 1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00630-6 Gustafson, R. (1992). A Swedish psychometric test of the rathus assertiveness schedule. Psychological Reports, 71(2), 479–482. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1992.71.2.479 Hafnidar, H., Harniati, I., Hailemariam, M., & Handrianto, C. (2021). Students` self-regulation: An analysis of exploratory factors of self-regulation scale. Spektrum: Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah (PLS), 9(2), 220-225. https://doi.org/10.24036/spektrumpls.v9i2.112589 Handrianto, C., Jusoh, A. J., Goh. P. S. C., Abdul Rashid, N., & Rahman, M. A. (2020). The role of teachers in drug abuse prevention in schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000436 https://doi.org/10.30596/bibliocouns.v2i3.3736 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00065 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&scioq=Fenta%2C+T.+D.%2C+%26+Dinku%2C+A.+N.+Drug+Admittance+Houses%E2%80%99+Contribution+to+University+Students%E2%80%99+Vulnerability+to+Misbehavior+and+Risk+Factors%3A+the+case+of+Debre+Berhan+University%2C+Ethiopia.&q=Collins%2C+J.+J.+%282012%29.+Assertiveness+and+self-esteem%3A+substance+abusers.&btnG= https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.587125 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&scioq=Fenta%2C+T.+D.%2C+%26+Dinku%2C+A.+N.+Drug+Admittance+Houses%E2%80%99+Contribution+to+University+Students%E2%80%99+Vulnerability+to+Misbehavior+and+Risk+Factors%3A+the+case+of+Debre+Berhan+University%2C+Ethiopia.&q=Dares%2C+A.+E.+%281981%29.+A+preliminary+validity+study+of+the+Rathus+Assertiveness+Schedule+with+a+sample+of+the+South+African+university+population.&btnG= https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1590778 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Description+of+body+conformation+of+Nigerian+Indigenous+Turkeys+using+exploratory+factor+analysis&btnG= https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Factors+Affecting+the+Communication+Skills+Amongst+the+Undergraduate+Medical+Imaging+Students+At+the+International+Islamic+University+Malaysia+%28Iium%29+Kuantan%2C+Pahang&btnG= https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2020.1825448 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419865769 https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_107_21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00630-6 https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1992.71.2.479 Verification of Reliability and Validity of a Malaysian Version of Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as Drug Prevention Scale 14 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i11/8131 Handrianto, C., Jusoh, A. J., Goh, P. S. C., Rashid, N. A., & Saputra, E. (2021). Teachers` self-efficacy as a critical determinant of the quality of drug education among Malaysian students. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research, 10(3). Google Scholar Horan, J. J., D’Amico, M. M., & Williams, J. M. (1975). Assertiveness and patterns of drug use: A pilot study. Journal of Drug Education, 5(3), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.2190/NLB1-T51N-B58Q-6BTP Husin, A., Maharani, S. D., Raharjo, M., Yosef, Y., Sumarni, S., & Handrianto, C. (2023). Prospects for implementation of green campus in education and research pillars at edupark fkip Unsri become edutourism. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), e01597. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1597 Ilhami, A., Yusrianto, E., Lokollo, L., Fadilah, M., & Handrianto, C. (2023). Innovation of a model of field experience practice-based lesson study (THLS) to enhance pre-service science teacher research skills. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(1), 80- 87. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i1.51386 Immanuel, E. U. (2019). Initial development of assertive behavior inventory. Practicum Psychologia, 9(2), 322–338. http://journals.aphriapub.com/index.php.pp Ismail, M., Siwok, S. R., & Kz, A. R. (2020). The relationship between assertive behaviour and islamic work ethics among support staff in Malaysia. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 18(1), 116– 123. Google Scholar Jenerette, C., & Dixon, J. (2010). Developing a short form of the simple rathus assertiveness schedule using a sample of adults with sickle cell disease. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 21(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659609360712 Kazemi, A., Yela, J. D., & Rosado, T. G. (2019). Presenting a conceptual model for predicting attitude towards substance abuse based on assertiveness, psychological hardiness, and emotional regulation. Journal of Psychology New, 3(7), 1–17. Google Scholar Khairunnisa, H., & Putri, A. A. H. (2019). Relationship of assertive behaviors and social media addiction among adolescents. https://doi.org/10.2991/acpch-18.2019.28 Knekta, E., Runyon, C., & Eddy, S. (2019). One size doesn’t fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064 Kocak Uyaroglu, A., & Ozcan, A. (2022). The effect of empowerment training in protecting adolescents from substance abuse on self-efficacy, self-esteem, and assertiveness levels. ADDICTA: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 9(3), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.5152/addicta.2022.22007 Likisa, K. (2019). The causes and challenges of students’ drug abuse in higher learning institutions: A comprehensive review of related literature. Ethiopian Journal of Science and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 33 - 45. https://doi.org/10.20372/ejssdastu:v6.i2.2019.88 Maqbool Parray, W., Kumar, S., E. David, B., & Khare, S. (2020). Assertiveness predicts self- esteem, academic achievement, and stress: A study of Kashmiri adolescents. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(1), 707–715. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8185 Maulinsari, P. G., & Purnama, D. S. (2022). Assertive behavior development for drug abuse prevention through group guidance services. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 3537–3544. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1737 Menon, I. S., & Edward, M. (2014). Locus of control , assertiveness and general well-being among alcoholics and non-alcoholics. Guru Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2(1), 258–264. Google Scholar Mustapha, S. Z., Harith, N. H. M., & Ismail, T. N. T. (2020). Sustainable drug treatment and rehabilitation programme in Malaysia: Empowering the client through “555 note book.” https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Ismail%2C+M.%2C+Siwok%2C+S.+R.%2C+%26+Kz%2C+A.+R.+%282020%29.+the+Relationship+Between+Assertive+Behaviour+and+Islamic+Work+Ethics+Among+Support+Staff+in+Malaysia.+Jurnal+Kemanusiaan%2C+18%281%29%2C+116%E2%80%93123.&btnG= https://doi.org/10.2190/NLB1-T51N-B58Q-6BTP http://journals.aphriapub.com/index.php.pp https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Ismail%2C+M.%2C+Siwok%2C+S.+R.%2C+%26+Kz%2C+A.+R.+%282020%29.+the+Relationship+Between+Assertive+Behaviour+and+Islamic+Work+Ethics+Among+Support+Staff+in+Malaysia.+Jurnal+Kemanusiaan%2C+18%281%29%2C+116%E2%80%93123.&btnG= https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659609360712 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Presenting+a+Conceptual+Model+for+Predicting+Attitude+towards+Substance+Abuse+Based+on+Assertiveness%2C+Psychological+Hardiness%2C+and+Emotional+Regulation&btnG= https://doi.org/10.2991/acpch-18.2019.28 https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064 https://doi.org/10.5152/addicta.2022.22007 https://doi.org/10.20372/ejssdastu:v6.i2.2019.88 https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8185 https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1737 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Locus+of+Control%2C+Assertiveness+and+General+Well-Being+among+Alcoholics+and+Non-Alcoholics&btnG= Jusoh, A. J., Imami, M. K. W., Handrianto, C., Isa, A. N. M., Omar, S. Z., Abdullah, A., & Wahab, S. 15 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(14). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i14/7364 Nengsih, Y. K., Handrianto, C., Nurrizalia, M., Waty, E. R. K., & Shomedran, S. (2022). Media and resources development of android based interactive digital textbook in nonformal education. Journal of Nonformal Education, 8(2), 185-191. https://doi.org/10.15294/jne.v8i2.34914 Parmaksiz, İ., & Kiliçarslan, S. (2020). The relationship between assertiveness and separation- individuation in adolescents. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 10(3), 869–888. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.027 Ramadhan, I., Keliat, B. A., & Wardani, I. Y. (2019). Assertiveness training and family psychoeducational therapies on adolescents mental resilience in the prevention of drug use in boarding schools. In Enfermeria Clinica (Vol. 29, pp. 326–330). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.040 Ramdan, I. M. (2019). Reliability and validity test of the Indonesian version of the hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAM-A) to measure work-related stress in nursing. Jurnal Ners, 14(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v14i1.10673 Rathinasabapathy, B. (2022). a Study To Evaluate the effectiveness of assertiveness training programme (ATP) to impart assertive behaviour among adolescents. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(6), 5054–5061. http://journalppw.com Rathus, S. A., & Nevid, J. S. (1977). Concurrent validity of the 30-item assertiveness schedule with a psychiatric population. Behavior Therapy, 8(3), 393–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(77)80074-9 Rodzlan Hasani, W. S., Miaw Yn, J. L., Saminathan, T. A., Robert Lourdes, T. G., Ramly, R., Abd Hamid, H. A., Ismail, H., Abd Majid, N. L., Mat Rifin, H., Awaluddin, S. M., & Mohd Yusoff, M. F. (2019). Risk factors for illicit drug use among malaysian male adolescents. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 31(8_suppl), 48S-56S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539519865053 Rom, F. M., Mahmud, A. A., Suainbon, R., & Miskan, M. (2023). Psychological impact and coping style among students of national defence university of Malaysia during the covid- 19 pandemic. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 22(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v22i1.61866 Roshanzadeh, M., Vanaki, Z., Sadooghiasl, A., Tajabadi, A., & Mohammadi, S. (2021). Explaining courage in ethical decision-making by nursing managers: A qualitative content analysis. Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery, 31(4), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.32598/JHNM.31.4.2141 Schrepp, M. (2020). On the usage of cronbach’s alpha to measure reliability of UX scales. Journal of Usability Studies, 15(4), 247–258. Google Scholar Sellbom, M., & Tellegen, A. (2019). Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1428–1441. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000623 Shah, F., Kaleem, M., & Ali, A. (2020). Nexus between family, drug abuse and academic performance: evidences from selected universities in district Mardan. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research., 02(03), 1–23. Google Scholar Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2 Sotoudeh, H. G., Nazari, M. A., & Mirhashemi, M. (2021). A social-cognitive educational protocol for parents with adolescents at risk of substance use: Impact on adolescents’ life skill. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 16(3), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v16i3.6255 Surucu, L., & Maslakci, A. (2020). View of validity and reliability in quantitative research. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i14/7364 https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.027 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.040 https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v14i1.10673 http://journalppw.com/ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(77)80074-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539519865053 https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v22i1.61866 https://doi.org/10.32598/JHNM.31.4.2141 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Schrepp%2C+M.+%282020%29.+On+the+Usage+of+Cronbach%E2%80%99s+Alpha+to+Measure+Reliability+of+UX+Scales.+Journal+of+Usability+Studies%2C+15%284%29%2C+247%E2%80%93258.&btnG= https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000623 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Shah%2C+F.%2C+Kaleem%2C+M.%2C+%26+Ali%2C+A.+%282020%29.+Nexus+Between+Family%2C+Drug+Abuse+and+Academic+Performance%3A+Evidences+from+Selected+Universities+in+District+Mardan.+Pakistan+Journal+of+Humanities+and+Social+Sciences+Research.%2C+02%2803%29%2C+1%E2%80%9323.&btnG= https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2 https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v16i3.6255 Verification of Reliability and Validity of a Malaysian Version of Rathus Assertiveness Schedule as Drug Prevention Scale 16 Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16, 2023 Business & Management Studies: An International Journal , 2694–2726. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540 Suzuki, E., Kanoya, Y., Katsuki, T., & Sato, C. (2007). Verification of reliability and validity of a japanese version of the rathus assertiveness schedule. Journal of Nursing Management, 15(5), 530–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00691.x Tatari, F., Farnia, V., Momeni, K., Davarinejad, O., Salemi, S., Soltani, B., Niazi, N., & Alikhani, M. (2021). Predicting addiction potential based on sensation-seeking, psychological hardiness and assertiveness in students in western Iran: an analytical study. Journal of Substance Use, 26(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2020.1760371 Tymes, D. D., Outlaw, K. L., & Hamilton, B. K. (2016). Life skills interventions to improve social confidence, self-management, and protection against drug use in rural elementary school aged children. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 33(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370016.2016.1120592 Vagos, P., & Pereira, A. (2019). Towards a cognitive-behavioral understanding of assertiveness: effects of cognition and distress on different expressions of assertive behavior. Journal of Rational - Emotive and Cognitive - Behavior Therapy, 37(2), 133– 148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-018-0296-4 Vancappel, A., Raysseguier, C., Bouyer, C., Jansen, E., Mangolini, A., Brunault, P., Barbe, P. G., Réveillère, C., & El-Hage, W. (2023). Development of the transdiagnostic skills scale (T2S). Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 77(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2022.2082522 Wan Sulaiman, W. S., Kamaluddin, M. R., Zakaria, E., Ibrahim, F., Hassan, N., Manap, J., Nen, S., Ahmad Zamani, Z., & Yusooff, F. (2021). Exploring gender differences in the vulnerability towards drug abuse among adolescents in Malaysia. Psikohumaniora: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21580/pjpp.v6i1.6679 Yıldırım, M., & Güler, A. (2022). Factor analysis of the COVID-19 perceived risk scale: A preliminary study. Death Studies, 46(5), 1065–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1784311 Zainil, M., Kenedi, A. K., Rahmatina, R., Indrawati, T., & Handrianto, C. (2023). The influence of a STEM-based digital classroom learning model and high-order thinking skills on the 21st century skills of elementary school students in Indonesia. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 10(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i1.4336 Copyright holder : © Jusoh, A. J., Imami, M. K. W., Handrianto, C., Isa, A. N. M., Omar, S. Z., Abdullah, A., & Wahab, S. (2023) First publication right : Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal This article is licensed under: CC-BY-SA https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00691.x https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2020.1760371 https://doi.org/10.1080/07370016.2016.1120592 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-018-0296-4 https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2022.2082522 https://doi.org/10.21580/pjpp.v6i1.6679 https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1784311