BOX 1 IJPP ­ Italian Journal of Planning Practice 1Vol. III, issue 1 ­ 2013 Giacomina Di Salvo ISSN: 2239­267X Architect, PhD in Urban Planning Dipartimento Design, Tecnologia dell’Architettura, Territorio e Ambiente ­ Sapienza Università di From a geological point of view Italy is a young and dynamic country; this explains why almost all of its territory is characterised by seismic hazard, at different levels. Not only that of hazard but other indicators determine the seismic risk: vulnerability (of structures, buildings and towns) and exposure (functions and numbers of occupants). The Italian urban system shows a very high level of vulnerability, due to both its high urban density, a diffuse historic heritage and the weakness of prevention and safety goals in urban planning. As an example, the damages provoked by earthquakes in Italy are statistically much greater compared with what happens in other seismic areas like California or Japan; the earthquake which struck the two Central Italy regions of Marche and Umbria in 1997, caused the same level of damage as the Californian earthquake of 1989, where the seismic event had been much more violent. A brief history of the main earthquakes in Italy in the last fifty years underlines the lack of a useful and effective national legislative framework to address the problem. The point is that national policies have always been focused on emergencies and on reconstruction rather than on prevention, that THE POLICY OF RECONSTRUCTION AND REDUCTION OF SEISMIC RISK IN ITALY A Brief History of recent earthquakes IJPP ­ Italian Journal of Planning Practice 2Vol. III, issue 1 ­ 2013 Di Salvo ­ Box 1: reconstruction and reduction of seismic risk in Italy is to say, following an event rather than trying to prevent its worst effects. As a matter of fact, each strong earthquake has brought the production of many laws for reconstruction, without creating a systematic framework of policies and tools for prevention. Only with the national Law 77/2009, originated after the tragic seismic event in the town of L'Aquila, have some steps been taken in this direction. This Act provides for a national plan for the mitigation of seismic risks and it should be implemented at regional and local level through specific tools directed to defining local levels of seismic hazard (geological micro zoning analysis) and to improve urban and territorial capability for emergency management. REFERENCES http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/jcms/it/emerg_it_sismico.wp NIMIS P. (2009), Terre Mobili: Donzelli; DI SALVO G., GIUFFRÉ M., PELLEGRINO P., PIZZO B., for INU working group: Seismic risk and urban vulnerability, Comparative and critical notes on recent Italian legislations in the field of seismic risk (unpublished). MAIN EARTHQUAKES IN ITALY IN 20TH CENTURY AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES ON THE SEISMIC RISK POLICY IJPP ­ Italian Journal of Planning Practice 3Vol. III, issue 1 ­ 2013 Di Salvo ­ Box 1: reconstruction and reduction of seismic risk in Italy MAIN EARTHQUAKES IN ITALY IN 20TH CENTURY AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES ON THE SEISMIC RISK POLICY