The Relationship of Perceived Value, Perceived Risk, and Level of Trust Towards Green Products of Fast Moving Consumer Goods Purchase Intention by Rizka Zulfikar, Prihatini Ade Mayvita JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 85 The Relationship of Perceived Value, Perceived Risk, and Level of Trust Towards Green Products of Fast Moving Consumer Goods Purchase Intention Rizka Zulfikar *) Prihatini Ade Mayvita **) ABSTRACT This study aims to investigate how the relation between the perceived value, perceived risk, level of trust and toward green products purchase intention. This study is a survey research using questionnaires as an instrument. Population and sample used in this study is the community of Banjarmasin and taken as many as 150 respondents using non-purposive sampling method. The study found that Banjarmasin’s public tends to be more considered in its functional value indicators than other indicators such as social value, emotional value, and economic value. They also tend to be more considered at time risk indicators than other indicators such as the risk of physical and psychological risks. Banjarmasin’s public tends to be more considered toward its benefits indicators than other indicators such as trust in the object, and trust in attributes. Perceived value and perceived risk affect the level of public confidence but have no effect to the public purchase intention towards green products. The level of trust significantly influences the purchase intention towards green products. The relationship between the public purchase intention towards green products with the perceived value and perceived risk tends to be indirect and moderated by variable levels of trust. Keywords: Perceived Value; Perceived Risk; Level of Trust; Purchase Intention; Green Products 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Research Background The application of green economy as a form of global awareness about the importance of the environment towards the future has been intensively conducted. Many countries have managed to improve the quality in every area without ignoring the environmen (UNEP, 2011). The green economy movement takes time and effort to be realized in the community, so it needs good cooperation between government, companies, society, and this has an impact on the company's tendency to be more concerned about environmental protection as their social responsibility (Dwyer, 2009; Lee, 2009). The growth of public awareness of the environment (Waskito & Witono, 2011) has also been taken advantage by many companies as the opportunity to work up their businesses (Haden, Oyler, & Humphreys, 2009). In an era where the people are aware of their environmental sustainability, companies are beginning to pay more attention to green marketing in some industries, such as the information and electronics industry (Chen, 2010). The expectations for green products are often hurt by the perception that the product is of low quality or does not really meet the promises mentioned in the promotion stating that their products are environmentally friendly. Marketers should be aware that consumers are not only focused on the issue of environmentally friendly products, but they must also remember that consumers do not compromise on traditional product attributes, such as value, quality, price, and performance. To attract consumers, Green products attributes should not be inferior to those non-green products (Hsin & Wen, 2008). The environmental friendliness of a product cannot guarantee an increase in sales, even in the green era. Hsin & Wen (2008) argued that companies need to develop products that have attributes instead of selling the environmental friendliness alone, the products need high-value http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 86 attributes to improve consumer purchase intentions. In addition, one of the key elements of a green marketing strategy is credibility. Reducing consumers' perceived risk in consuming green products can help to lower customers skepticism and increase their trust. The biggest challenge in producing and developing green products is the ever-changing of the consumer preferences and perceptions that unfavorable to green products (Singal, Anuradha, & Sanjay, 2013) because negative expectations will affect purchasing behavior (Chen, 2008). So it is very important to explore information and knowledge about consumer attitudes toward green products or environmentally friendly products (Chen & Chai, 2010). Research by Waskito & Witono (2011) found that consumers have a growing awareness level of environmentally friendly products, but not yet accompanied by the actions or decisions of purchasing green products. 1.2 Research Problem a) Does the perceived value have a significant effect on the trust and purchase intention on green products in the FMCG sector? b) Does the perceived risk have a significant effect on the trust and purchase intention on green products in the FMCG sector? c) Does the trust in green products have a significant effect on the purchase intention of green products in the FMCG sector? 1.3 Research Purpose a) To understand the influence and model that explain the relationship between the product perceived value, perceived risk, and level of trust with green product buying behavior in the FMCG sector. b) To contribute to the research that encourages the development of green products through inputs and suggestions on strategies to increase the people's purchase intention and indirectly also participate in promoting the concept of green economy in society. c) As a reference for additional knowledge in the field of marketing management science and the green economy. 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT 2.1 Perceived Value Perceived value is a set of attributes associated with the perceptions of the value of a product to build a positive effect and increase purchase intentions (Ashton, Scott, Solnet, & Breakey, 2010). The previous research showed that perceived value positively affects consumers purchase intentions (Gounaris, Tzempelikos, & Chatzipanagiotou, 2007). If consumers feel that the value of a product is high, they are more likely to buy the product (Chen, 2008). 2.2 Perceived Risk Perceived risk is the consumer's assessment of the likelihood of the negativity that will occur when purchasing the product (Mowen & Minor, 2002) Reducing the perceived risk of the customer in green products may help to lower customer skepticism and increase their trust (Hsin & Wen, 2008). 2.3 Trust The level of trust is the knowledge possessed by the consumers about their conclusion regarding the object, its attributes, and its benefits (Mowen & Minor, 2002). Knowledge plays an http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 87 important role in the consumers' acceptance of green products because the consumers who know environmental issues and product benefits tend to prefer green products (Kim & Seock, 2009). Another hand, Increasing consumers' knowledge on environmental issues will increase consumers' preference for green products (Shaikh & Mustaghis, 2011) and increasing consumers' trust will also increase their purchase intention in green products (Zulfikar & Mayvita, 2017). 2.4 Purchase Intention Purchasing intention is the prospect of the consumers to buy a product in the future (Howard, 1990), and in deciding to buy green products, consumers not only consider environmental factors but also the product quality. Various studies have shown that environmental attributes of green products still have little effect on consumer action and behavior compared to satisfaction factors (Chang & Fong, 2010). The researchers agreed that the consumer acceptance of green products tends more to the satisfaction factors and they favor the company activities that do not harm the environment. Based on this fact, the companies need to develop products that have attributes that not only consist of environmental friendliness but also products with high values to improve consumer purchase intentions (Leonidou, Leonidou, & Kvasova, 2010). 2.5 The Relationships Between Perceived Value and Perceived Risk Toward Trust and Green Product Purchase Intention From a study conducted by Hamid, Ghafoor, & Shah (2012) that examined the attitude of the Pakistani people to green products, in developing countries, the influence of public perception and attitudes toward environmentally friendly products is still low and has no significant effect on consumer behavior in buying green products. While the results of the research conducted by Diyah & Wijaya (2017) about the purchase intention of Yogyakarta people to green products found that the community attitudes, healthy lifestyles, environmental orientation, and buying behavior have a significant influence on the purchase intention of the products. Therefore, the hypotheses to be tested in this study are as follows; H1: Variables of perceived value and perceived risk significantly affect the trust and purchase intention in green products H2: Variable of trust significantly affect the purchase intention of green products. 3. RESEARCH METHOD 3.1 Research Design This research can be classified as quantitative survey research with questionnaire as the instrument of research. Likert scale with the scale from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree with 5 alternative answers is used as the perception measurement. In SEM analysis, test on the suitability of the model was conducted, in which the research model must meet the criteria of goodness of fit index. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 88 Table 1 Variabel, Operational Definition, and Indicator Variable Operational Definition Indicator Measurement Note Green Perceived Value (GPV) The value that the prospective consumers perceived about all the benefits that they will get when buying the product. (Kotler & Keller, 2010) 1) Emotional Value (PV1) 2) Economical Value (PV2) 3) Functional Value (PV3) - Social Value (PV5) 4) Social Value (PV4) Using interval scale 1-5, with an agree- disagree scale technique. Endogenous/ Observed Variable/ Construct/ Latent Green Perceived Risk (GR) The consumer's assessment of the likelihood of the negativity that will occur when purchasing the product. (Mowen & Minor, 2002) z 1) Physical Risk (GR1) 2) Psychological Risk (GR2) 3) Time Risk (GR3) Using interval scale 1-5, with an agree- disagree scale technique. Endogenous/ Observed Variable/ Construct/ Latent Green Trust (GT) The knowledge possessed by the consumers about their conclusion about the object, its attributes, and its benefits. (Mowen & Minor, 2002) 1) Attribute Trust (GT1) 2) Object Trust (GT2) 3) Benefits Trust (GT3) Using interval scale 1-5, with an agree- disagree scale technique. Exogenous/ Unobserved Variable/ Manifest Green Purchase Intention (GPI) The prospect of the consumers to buy a product in the future. (Howard, 1990) 1) Transactional (GPI1) 2) Referential (GPI2) 3) Preferential (GPI3) 4) Explorative (GPI3) Using interval scale 1-5, with an agree- disagree scale technique. Exogenous/ Unobserved Variable/ Manifest 3.2 Population and Sample The population in this study were Banjarmasin people and this study used 150 samples with the minimum sample size was obtained by using slovin formula. According to Banjarmasin Central Bureau of Statistics, the population of Banjarmasin up to 2016 has reached 675,440 people, with population proportion= 10% and the absolute error rate that can be tolerated is 5%, then the minimum sample size used in this research is as follows: n = 675.440 x (1,96)2 x 0.1 x 0.9 (675439)𝑥 (0.05)2+ (1,96)2 x 0.1 x 0.9 = 138 This study used 150 people as the samples and this amount had met the minimum requirements of the sample size. Sampling is done by non-purposive sampling technique followed by editing data using Microsoft Excel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 89 3.3 Research Framework Picture 1 Research Framework 4. RESEARCH RESULT AND ANALYSIS 4.1 Descriptive Analysis Table 2 Profile of Respondent Criteria Total % Criteria Total % Gender Income (IDR) Male 79 0.53 < 1 Million 39 0.26 Female 71 0.47 1– 2,49 Million 7 0.0467 Age 2,5 – 4,9 Million 32 0.2133 Under 20 years old 49 0.3267 5– 9,9 Million 43 0.2867 21 – 30 years old 17 0.1133 > 10 Million 29 0.1933 31 – 40 years old 26 0.1733 Education 41 - 50 years old 52 0.3467 Elementary/Middle/High 60 0.4 Above 50 years old 6 0.04 Diploma 5 0.0333 Occupation Bachelor 52 0.3467 Unemployed 10 0.0667 Master 29 0.1933 Student 6 0.04 Doctoral 4 0.0267 Civil Servant 18 0.12 Private employee 62 0.4133 Professional Services 34 0.2267 Entrepreneur 20 0.1333 Source: Primary Data Processed, 2017 This research consists of 4 variables, perceived value, perceived risk, trust and purchase intention in green product. The description of data presented include Minimum, Maximum, Mean (M) and standard deviation (SD). Trust Perceived Value Perceived Risk Purchase Intention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 90 Table 3 Descriptive Variable Green Variable N Min. Max. Mean SD Perceived Value 150 20.00 39.00 28.62 4.35 Perceived Risk 150 6.00 29.00 19.73 4.41 Trust 150 15.00 30.00 22. 33 3.77 Purchase Intention 150 20.00 40.00 31. 19 4.77 Valid N 150 150 150 150 150 Source: Primary Data Processed, 2017 Table 4 Categorization of perceived value, perceived risk, trust and purchase intention Variable High Medium Low F % F % F % Perceived Value 21 14.00 103 68.67 26 17.33 Perceived Risk 18 12.00 107 71.33 25 16.67 Trust 16 10.67 106 70.67 28 18.67 Purchase Intention 29 19.33 101 67.33 20 13.33 Source: Primary Data Processed, 2017 Based on table 5, it can be said that the majority of all variables observed are considered good enough by the Banjarmasin people. Table 5 Descriptive of Indicator Category No Indicator Indicator Categorize Mi Sdi Low Medium High 1 GPV1 7.04 1.45 17 114 19 2 GPV2 5.89 1.86 42 77 31 3 GPV3 8.05 1.78 30 77 43 4 GPV4 7.64 1.64 13 118 19 5 GR1 6.67 1.97 25 101 24 6 GR2 6.63 1.93 23 110 17 7 GR3 7.15 1.81 28 88 34 8 GT1 7.23 1.46 13 116 21 9 GT2 6.58 1.71 16 120 14 10 GT3 8.52 1.28 21 83 46 11 GPI1 7.61 1.33 30 88 32 12 GPI2 7.97 1.33 22 99 29 13 GPI3 7.18 1.55 17 105 28 14 GPI4 8.44 1.42 24 82 44 Source: Primary Data Processed, 2017 The table shows that the majority of respondents put all indicators into medium category, so it can be concluded that the indicators category on the variables of perceived value, perceived risk, the level of trust, and purchase intention to the green products studied are already good enough. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 91 Table 6 Compare Means Indicator Indicator Means Indicator Means Perceived Value Trust Emotional 7.04 Object 7.23 Economic 5.89 Attribute 6.58 Functional 8.05 Usability 8.52 Social 7.64 Purchase Intention Perceived Risk Transactional 7.61 Physical 6.67 Reference 7.97 Psychological 6.63 Preference 7.18 Time 7.15 Explorative 8.44 Source: Primary Data Processed, 2017 Based on the table, it can be described as follows: a) Based on the mean result, the order of indicators of the perceived value that are considered to be more dominant by the respondents, from the highest are i) functional value ii) social value iii) emotional value and iv) economical value. Based on the results of this research, it can be said that consumers tend to prioritize the functional values of green products compared to other indicators, and consumers still believe in the social and emotional values than the economic value of a product in establishing their perceptions. b) Based on the mean result, the order of indicators of the perceived risk that are considered to be more dominant by the respondents, from the highest are 1) time risk, ii) physical risk, iii) psychological risk. Therefore, it can be said that people tend to prioritize time efficiency or product availability than other risk considerations such as physical and psychological. c) Based on the mean result, the order of indicators of the level of trust that are considered to be more dominant by the respondents, from the highest are i) the Benefits Trust, ii) the Object Trust, and iii) the Attribute Trust. Based on the result of this research, it can be said that consumers still prefer the benefits of products than other indicators in establishing their trust in green products. Even the trust in the product as the green product is preferred by consumers compared to product attribute indicators such as price, packaging, and appearance. d) Based on the average (mean) result, the order of indicators of the purchase intention that are considered to be more dominant by the respondents, from the highest are Explorative - Referential – Transactional, and the last is preferential. Based on this result, it can be said that people tend to take action to seek information about the product and then invite their friends to discuss positive things about the product before making the transaction to buy the product as the next step of the purchase intention. This is in line with the opinion of Waskito and Witono (2011) which stated that public awareness of green products is not automatically manifested in the act of buying products. 4.2 Validity and Reliability The validity of the instruments is determined by using the Pearson Correlation test on the basis of decision making. The variable is said to be valid if p < 0.05 means H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. Based on the validity test there are some statements that are considered invalid because of the sig. value. < 0.05, so it should be excluded from the questionnaire. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 92 Table 7 Validity Test No Item Pearson Correlation Sig. (1-Tailed) Conclusion 1 Perceived Value_1 0.390 0.007 Valid 2 Perceived Value_2 0.457 0.006 Valid 3 Perceived Value_3 0.592 0.000 Valid 4 Perceived Value_5 0.620 0.000 Valid 5 Perceived Value_6 0.549 0.001 Valid 6 Perceived Value_7 0.475 0.001 Valid 7 Perceived Value_8 0.364 0.004 Valid 8 Perceived Value_9 0.739 0.000 Valid 9 Perceived Risk_1 0.441 0.007 Valid 10 Perceived Risk_3 0.685 0.000 Valid 11 Perceived Risk_4 0.612 0.000 Valid 12 Perceived Risk_6 0.602 0.000 Valid 13 Perceived Risk_8 0.673 0.000 Valid 14 Perceived Risk_10 0.441 0.000 Valid 15 Trust_1 0.712 0.000 Valid 16 Trust_3 0.549 0.001 Valid 17 Trust_4 0.630 0.000 Valid 18 Trust_5 0.640 0.000 Valid 19 Trust_6 0.737 0.000 Valid 20 Trust_9 0.609 0.000 Valid 21 Purchase Intention_1 0.670 0.000 Valid 22 Purchase Intention_2 0.707 0.000 Valid 23 Purchase Intention_3 0.570 0.000 Valid 24 Purchase Intention_4 0.743 0.000 Valid 25 Purchase Intention_6 0.643 0.000 Valid 26 Purchase Intention_8 0.567 0.001 Valid 27 Purchase Intention_9 0.661 0.000 Valid 28 Purchase Intention_10 0.670 0.000 Valid Source: Primary Data Processed, 2017 The Reliability test refers to the reliability level of the instrument. Reliability coefficient is obtained by looking at Cronbach's Alpha value, and test result can be seen in the following table: Table 8 Reliability Test Cronbach's Alpha N of Items 0.933 40 Source: Primary Data Processed, 2017 Based on this result, it can be said that the questionnaire used in this study has very high reliability because the value of Cronbach's alpha instrument is 0.933. 4.3 Research Analysis The result of the data analysis has produced SEM model which can be seen in picture 2. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 93 Picture 2 SEM Model Based on the research model obtained, the comparison of research results based on the criteria of Goodness of Fit (GOF) required for model suitability analysis is as follows: Table 9 GOF The Goodness of Fit (GOF) Index Cut Off Value Result Decision Chi-Square Low 50,080 Low Probability ≥ 0.05 0.510 Good GFI ≥ 0.9 0.955 Good AGFI ≥ 0.9 0.907 Good TLI ≥ 0.95 1.002 Good CFI ≥ 0.95 1.000 Good CMIN/DF ≤ 2,00 0.982 Good RMSEA ≤ 0.080 0.000 Good Source: Primary Data Processed, 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 94 Based on this result, it can be said that the research model has a good level of Goodness of Fit (GOF). 4.4 Research Discussion After the research model met the GOF criteria, the model can be used to perform hypothesis testing by observing the CR, and Sig values of the variables studied based on the maximum likelihood estimates by looking at the Regression Weights table, which is said to have a significant effect when the CR value > 1.96 and probability value < 0.05. The test result of the effects of the variables tested based on the modified model is shown in the following table: Table 10 Regression Weights-Maximum Likelihood Estimates Est P CR P Conclusion Trust <--- Perceived_Value .225 .084 2.668 .000 Accepted Trust <--- Perceived_Risk -.132 .103 2.287 .000 Accepted Purchase_Intention <--- Trust .548 .139 3.937 .000 Accepted Purchase_Intention <--- GT3 .309 .067 4.605 .000 Accepted Purchase_Intention <--- Perceived_Value .019 .079 .236 .813 Rejected Purchase_Intention <--- Perceived_Risk .032 .108 .301 .764 Rejected ***) P = > 0.05,CR > 1.96 Source: Primary Data Processed, 2017 Based on table 10, the hypothesis test results can be described as follows: a. The perceived value variable has a significant effect on the level of trust due to the reason that the CR value (2,668) ≥ 1.96 and probability (.000) < 0.001. b. The perceived risk variable has a significant effect on the level of people’s trust due to the reason that CR value (2.287) ≥ 1.96 and probability (.000) < 0.001. c. The perceived value variable has no significant effect on the people's purchase intention due to the reason that the CR value (0.236) < 1.96 and probability (0.813) > 0.001. This result is different with the findings of Gounaris, Tzempelikos, & Chatzipanagiotou (2007), Chen (2008), and Ashton, Scott, Solnet, & Breakey (2010) who stated that perceived value positively affects consumer purchase intentions and perceived value can build a positive impact that will increase purchasing intentions. Banjarmasin consumers still looking for functional value in rather than social, emotional, and economic. d. The perceived value variable has no significant effect on the people's purchase intention due to the reason that the CR value (0.301) < 1.96 and probability (0.764) > 0.001. This result is different with Hsin & Wen (2008) who stated that reducing the perceived risk of the customer in consuming green products can help to reduce customer scepticism and improve their trust but some researchers agreed that the consumers prefer the factors of satisfaction and company activities that do not harm the environment (Leonidou, Leonidou, & Kvasova, 2010). e. The trust variable has a significant influence on the people's purchase intention due to the reason that the CR value (3,937) ≥ 1.96 and probability value < 0.001. This result supports the Zulfikar & Mayvita (2017) research which stated that the level of trust has a significant effect on people's purchase intention on green products. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 95 5. RESEARCH CONCLUSION AND LIMITATION 5.1 Conclusion Based on the results of data analysis and the findings of research facts, then some conclusions that can be taken are perceived value, perceived risk, level of trust, and purchase intention of the Banjarmasin people to the majority of green products are quite good because the majority of the assessments were in the medium category. In determining the perceived value of green products, Banjarmasin people tend to consider functional value indicator more than other indicators like social value, emotional value, and economical value. While in determining the perceived risk perceptions of green products, Banjarmasin people tend to consider time risk indicator more than other indicators like physical risks, and psychological risks. In term of the trust of green products, Banjarmasin people tend to consider benefits trust indicator more than other indicators like object trust and attribute trust. The perceived value and perceived risk variable affects the level of trust variable but does not affect the purchase intention of green products. The trust variable significantly affects the people's purchase intention on the green product. The relationship between purchase intention with perceived value and perceived risk tends to be indirect and moderated by level of trust variables. 5.2 Limitation The research can be further developed by measuring the level of people's satisfaction on green products with sampling pattern by purposive sampling because it is assumed that the satisfaction factor is also a factor considered by the people in increasing their purchase intention. The development of green products needs to consider the priority and most-considered indicators in establishing the people's trust and purchase intention in green products. REFERENCES Ashton, A. S., Scott, N., Solnet, D., & Breakey, N. (2010). Hotel Restaurant Dining: The Relationship Between Perceived Value and Intention to Purchase. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 10(3), 206-218. https://doi.org/10.1057/thr.2010.5. Chang, N. J., & Fong, C. M. (2010). Green Product Quality, Green Corporate Image, Green Customer Satisfaction, And Green Customer Loyalty. African Journal of Business Management, 4(13), 2836. Chen, Y. S. (2008). The Driver Of Green Innovation And Green Image–Green Core Competence. Journal of business ethics, 81(3), 531-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007- 9522-1. Chen, Y. S. (2010). The Drivers Of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, And Green Trust. Journal of Business ethics, 93(2), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551- 009-0223-9. Chen, T. B., & Chai, L. T. (2010). Attitude Towards The Environment And Green Products: Consumers' Perspective. Management science and engineering, 4(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.500. Diyah, I. A., & Wijaya, T. (2017). Determinant Factors Of Purchase Intention On Green Product. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 15(1), 54-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jam23026332.15.1.07. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 96 Dwyer, R. J. (2009). “Keen To Be Green” Organizations: A Focused Rules Approach To Accountability. Management Decision, 47(7), 1200-1216. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910978377. Gounaris, S. P., Tzempelikos, N. A., & Chatzipanagiotou, K. (2007). The Relationships of Customer-Perceived Value, Satisfaction, Loyalty, and Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 6(1), 63-87. https://doi.org/10.1300/J366v06n01_05. Haden, S. S. P., Oyler, J. D., & Humphreys, J. H. (2009). Historical, Practical, and Theoretical Perspectives on Green Management: An Exploratory Analysis. Management Decision, 47(7), 1041-1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910978287. Hamid, S. A. R., Ghafoor, H. A., & Shah, T. Z. (2012). Analysis of Attitude Towards Green Purchase: Pakistan in Context. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(6). Howard, D. G. (1990). Understanding How American Consumers Formulate Their Attitudes About Foreign Products. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 2(2), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v02n02_02. Hsin, H. C., & Wen, S. C. (2008). The Impact Of Online Store Environment Cues On Purchase Intention: Trust And Perceived Risk As A Mediator. Online information review, 32(6), 818- 841. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810923953. Kim, S., & Seock, Y. K. (2009). Impacts of Health and Environmental Consciousness on Young Female Consumers Attitude Towards and Purchase of Natural Beauty Products. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(6), 627-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470- 6431.2009.00817.x. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2010). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. Lee, K. H. (2009). Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations? The case study of Korean SMEs in manufacturing industry. Management Decision, 47(7), 1101-1121. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910978322. Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., & Kvasova, O. (2010). Antecedents and outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(13- 14), 1319-1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2010.523710. Mowen, J., & Minor, M. (2002). Perilaku Konsumen. Edisi 5. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. Shaikh, A. S., & Mustaghis, U. R. (2011). Consumer Perceptions Of Green Products: A Survey Of Karachi. Journal Of Independent Studies And Research – MSSE, 9(2), 16-29. Singal, R., Anuradha, G., & Sanjay, S. (2013). Green Marketing: Challenges And Opportunities. International Journal Of Innovations In Engineering And Technology (Ijiet), 2(1), 470 – 474. UNEP. (2011). Towards A Green Economy: Pathways To Sustainable Development And Poverty Eradication - A Synthesis For Policy Makers. Retrieved from http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy. Waskito, J., & Witono, B. (2011). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Model Strategi Pemasaran Berwawasan Lingkungan: Studi Empiris pada Masyarakat Jogyakarta, Solo, dan Semarang (Doctoral dissertation, LPPM-UMS). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://www.unep.org/Greeneconomy JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018) http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jema (e-ISSN : 2597-4071) JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi dan Manajemen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 97 Zulfikar, R., & Mayvita, P. A. (2017, December). Tingkat Kepercayaan dan Minat Beli Masyarakat Banjarmasin Terhadap Produk Hijau Berdasarkan Segmentasi Demografis. In Proceeding of National Conference on Asbis, 2(1), 410-426. *) Rizka Zulfikar, Department of Management, Islamic University of Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin, Banjarmasin, Indonesia (Email : rizkazulfikar@gmail.com) **) Prihatini Ade Mayvita, Department of Management, Islamic University of Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin, Banjarmasin, Indonesia (Email : ademayvita@gmail.com) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/