E-ISSN : 2541-5794 P-ISSN : 2503-216X Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol 02 No 01 2017 46 Jannah, M. et al./ JGEET Vol 02 No 01/2017 Geological Structure Analysis to Determine the Direction of the Main Stress at Western Part of Kolok Mudik, Barangin District, Sawahlunto, West Sumatera Miftahul Jannah 1 , Adi Suryadi 1, *, Muchtar Zafir 1 , Randi Saputra 1 , Ihsanul Hakim 1 , Riki Ariyuswanto 1 , Ulfa Yusti 1 1 Department of Geological Engineering, Universitas Islam Riau, Jl, Kaharuddin Nasution No 113, Pekanbaru, Riau 28284 *Corresponding author: adisuryadi@eng.uir.ac.id Tel. +6282283896947 Abstract On the study area there are three types of structure, those are fault, fold and joint. Types of fault were found in the study area, reverse fault with the strike/dip is N215 o E/75 o , normal fault has a fault directions N22 o E and N200 o E with pitch 35 o , and dextral fault with pitch 10 o and strike N219 o E. Fold and joint structures used to determine the direction of the main stress on the study area. Further, an analysis used stereonet for data folds and joints. So that from the data got three directions of main stress, those are Northeast Southwest (T1), North South (T2) and Southeast Northwest (T3). On the Northeast Southwest (T1) stress there are four geological structures, anticline fold at ST.3 , syncline folds at ST. 13a, ST. 13b, ST. 13c and ST. 33, chevron fold at ST. 44 and joint at ST. 2. On the North South (T2) stress there are three geological structures, those are syncline fold at ST. 35, anticline fold at ST. 54 and joints at ST. 41, ST. 46 and ST. 47. On the Southeast Northwest (T3) stress were also three geological structures, those are chevron fold at ST 42a, overturned fold at ST. 42b, syncline fold at ST. 42c and joints at ST. 5 and ST. 34. Keyword: fault, fold, joint, stress. 1. Introduction The study area is located at Western part of Kolok Mudik, Kecamatan Barangin, Kotamadya Sawahlunto, Sumatera Barat. Study area is bounded by longitude 100 o 100 o 43 o 0 o The topography of Sawahlunto is hilly areas with elevation about 250 650 meters above sea level (Pebri aldi, 2015). The topography grown could be interpreted that on the study area be affected by tectonic activity such as fold or fault (Koesoemadinata and Matasak, 1981). Its can be seen from shape of river that nudge, indicated that river formed due to crack or fracture is relatively weak zone and then eroded along fracture (Fig 2). Hilly area would be described that this area has occured uplift and then formed a fold (Koesomadinata and Matasak, 1981). The study area is within ombilin basin. Overall the strucuture of the basin ombilin showed transtensional duplex or pull apart duplex systems. Woodcock and Fischer (1986) said in Situmorang, et.,al (1991). subduction of geometry from duplex faults would be meet in sub basin became single shear zone. Fig 1. Map of the Sawahlunto city (Basmoera, 2008) Study Area Received: Jan 1, 2017. Revised : 15 Feb 2017, Accepted: Feb 20, 2017, Published: 1 March 2017 DOI: 10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.1.20 mailto:adisuryadi@eng.uir.ac.id Jannah, M. et al./ JGEET Vol 02 No 01/2017 47 Figure. 2. Map of drainage in the study area; (A) Meander; (B) Subparallel; (C) Subtrellis This condition is so different with the geological structure of the northern part of Central Sumatra Basin that was developing at the time of Neogen and asymmetrical shape that led northwest-southeast (NW-SE) which is a pattern of young structure (Kausarian, 2017). 2. General Geology and Stratigraphy Based on Peta Geologi Lembar Solok (1995), the study area has two formation and one deposition, that are Silungkang Formation, Brani Formation and Porphyry Deposition. The Silungkang Formation there are andesit hornblende, andesit argit, meta-andesit with thin interbedded tuff, limestone, shale and clay shale (PH. Silitonga and Kastowo, 1995). There is also a Fusulinida fossil (Koesomadinata and Matasak, 1981). The Brani Formation there is conglomerate interbedded with sand. The Porphyry Deposition consist of porphyry quartz with quartz phenocrysts and feldspar (PH. Silitonga and Kastowo, 1995). Furthermore, wolud be found fractures on the body of rocks and alteration that happened on wall rocks (Berger, et.al,2008). After observation on the study area, we found three formation, that are Silungkang Formation, Brani Formation and Sangkarewang Formation. Silungkang Formation consists of limestone with mudstone type, sandstone and conglomerate. On the Brani Formation there are conglomerate, sandstone and shale. Meanwhile Sangkarewang Formation consists shale, sandstone, slump and crossbedding. 3. Methodology The methodology used in this research were literature review, field survey and stereonet analysis. The first literature review to known structure types on the study area. The study area in the field showed by plotting points to generate the geological mapping (Kausarian, 2016). After that field survey was done to get the data that needed to determine the direction of main stress from geological structure. The last analysis used streonet from the data. All of data has plotted on stereonet to get the direction of main stress at the study area (Adi Suryadi, 2016). 4. Geological Structure on the Study Area 4.1 Faults Geological structures on the study area are faults, folds and joints (Fig 3). Indication of fault is difficult to found in the field, because the rocks on the study area have been a heavily weathering (Rizky prata, 2011; (Putra and Choanji, 2016). On the study area, there are three types of fault, these are reverse fault, normal fault and dextral fault. Reverse fault located in southwest the study area with value fault plane is N215oE/75oon station 2. Normal fault located at central of study area, these are in station 10 with direction N200oE and pitch 35o, station 56 and station 57 has same direction is N22oE. Dextral fault located in north of study area with pitch 10o. Fault would be known if we found indications in the field, like waterfall, displacement of bedding and slickenside etc. 4.2 Folds On the study area were found four types of folds, there are anticline fold, syncline fold, chevron fold and overturned fold. The all of data would be plotted in stereonet to known the direction of main stress (Fig 5). Based on stereonet analysis result, there are three direction of main stress, those are Northeast Southwest, North South and Southeast Northwest (Table 1). 4.3 Joints On the study area, joints data took at southwest north of the study area. Based on joints data that has been obtained and analysis used stereonet (Figure 6), there are three direction of main stress, Northeast Southwest, North South and Southeast Northwest (Table2). 48 Jannah, M. et al./ JGEET Vol 02 No 01/2017 Fig 3. Geology map on the study area Fig. 4. (A) dextral fault; (B) reverse fault; (C) normal fault Jannah, M. et al./ JGEET Vol 02 No 01/2017 49 Fig. 5. Stereonet analysis of folds on the study area Table. 1. Stress analysis result of folds Station Hinge Line Hinge Surface Axis Surface Plunge Axis Line Directions of Major Stress ST. 3 25 o , N24 o E 18 o , N251 o E 72 o , N178 o E 18 o , N251 o E 72 o , N116 o E Steeply inclined fold Gently plunging fold Northeast Southwest ST. 13a 18 o , N219 o E 26 o , N315 o E 72 o , N131 o E 26 o , N315 o E 44 o , N87 o E Moderately inclined fold Gently plunging fold Northeast Southwest ST. 13b 28 o , N196 o E 21 o , N232 o E 66 o , N45 o E 21 o , N232 o E 80 o , N21 o E Steeply inclined fold Gently plunging fold Northeast Southwest ST. 13c 5 o , N23 o E 35 o , N251 o E 65 o , N137 o E 82 o , N20 o E 35 o , N251 o E Moderately inclined fold Vertical fold Northeast Southwest ST. 33 3 o , N204 o E 21 o , N256 o E 80 o , N126 o E 21 o , N256 o E 80 o , N114 o E Steeply inclined fold Gently plunging fold Northeast Southwest ST. 35 9 o , N23 o E 70 o , N279 o E 30 o , N118 o E 70 o , N279 o E 84 o , N188 o E Upright fold Steeply inclined fold North South ST. 42a 51 o , N140 o E 5 o , N225 o E 44 o , N329 o E 5 o , N225 o E 46 o , N186 o E Moderately inclined fold Horizontal fold Northwest - Southeast ST. 42b 25 o , N130 o E 52 o , N241 o E 44 o , N21 o E 52 o , N241 o E 70 o , N330 o E Steeply inclined fold Moderately plunging fold Northwest - Southeast ST. 42c 12 o , N349E 32 o , N249 o E 54 o , N91 o E 32 o , N249 o E 54 o , N80 o E Moderately inclined fold Moderately plunging fold Northwest Southeast ST. 44 8 o , N307 o E 38 o , N38 o E 72 o , N212 o E 38 o , N38 o E 62 o , N130 o E Steeply inclined fold Moderately plunging fold Northeast Southwest ST. 54 20 o , N5 o E 24 o , N270 o E 64 o , N156 o E 24 o , 270 o E 68 o , N181 o E Steeply inclined fold Gently plunging fold North South Hinge Surface Initial Line tho1 and tho3 Hinge Line Direction of Main Stress Limb 1 Limb 2 50 Jannah, M. et al./ JGEET Vol 02 No 01/2017 Fig. 6. Joints analysis used stereonet Table.2.Stress analysis result of joints Station Direction of Main Stress ST. 2 Northeast Southwest ST. 5 Southeast - Northwest ST. 34 Northwest - Southeast ST. 41 North South ST. 46 North South ST. 47 North South 5. Discussion Analysis result for folds and joints used stereonet, were met three main stress with direction, Northeast Southwest (T1), North South (T2) and Southeast Northwest (T3). Northeast Southwest (T1) main stress formed some structures, there are syncline folds, anticline folds, chevron fold and joint. North South (T2) main stress generated some structures, there are syncline folds, anticline folds and joints. Southeast Northwest (T3) main stress resulted three structures, there are chevron fold, overturned fold, syncline fold and joints. Table.3.Stress analysis on the study areas Stress Direction of Main Stress Station Geological Structure T1 Northeast Southwest ST. 3, ST. 13a, ST. 13b, ST. 13c, ST. 33, ST. 44 and ST. 2 anticline fold, syncline folds, chevron fold and joint. T2 North South ST. 35, ST. 54, ST. 41, ST. 46 and ST. 47 anticline fold, syncline fold and joints T3 Southeast Northwest ST. 42a, ST. 42b, ST. 42c, ST. 5 and ST.34 overturned fold, chevron fold, syncline fold and joints Jannah, M. et al./ JGEET Vol 02 No 01/2017 51 Figure. 7. Direction of main stress at study area 6. Conclusion Based on analysis of geological structure were found three main stress that deform the geological condition of study area. The first stress is Northeast Southwest (T1) this stress generated some structures, these are syncline folds, anticline folds, chevron fold and joint. Another stress is from North South (T2) that resulted syncline folds, anticline folds and joints. The last main stress with direction Southeast Northwest (T3) was form chevron fold, overturned fold, syncline fold and joints. 7. Acknowledgements We would like to say thanks for our parents that always prayed us. For our advisor is Mr. Adi Suryadi, B.Sc(Hons)., M.Sc that has been faithful guided us until this paper are Adlan Rahmat, Arsyad and Yogi Aditya that always have companied us when we are collected data in the field. References Aldi, Pebri. 2015. Sekilas Tentang Kota Sawahlunto.Kompasiana. URL http://www.kompasiana.com/aldi/sekilas- tentang- kotasawahlunto_54fd6acaa33311022150fd86. Basmoera, Z,. 2008. Peta Wilayah Kota Sawahlunto, Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Berger, Byron R., Ayuso, Robert A., Wynn, Jeffrey C., dan Seal, Robert R., 2008, Preliminary Model of Porphyry Copper Deposits, Open File Report 2008 1321 U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. Kausarian, H, J. T. S. Sumantyo, H. Kuze, K. Detri, G. F. Panggabean, 2016. Silica Sand Identification using ALOS PALSAR Full Polarimetry on The Northern Coastline of Rupat Island, Indonesia. International Journal on Advance Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJASEIT). Vol. 6, No. 5, 568-573. Kausarian. H., J. T. S. Sumantyo, H. Kuze, K. Detri, S. Wiyono, 2017, The Origin and Distribution of Silica Mineral On The Recent Surface of Rupat Island, Indonesia, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Vol. 12, No.4, February 2017, ISSN 1819-6608. Koesomadinata, R.P., dan Matasak, T., 1981, Stratigraphy and Sedimentation Ombilin Basin Central Sumatra (West Sumatra Province), Proceedings Indonesian Petroleum Association 10 th Annual Convetion, hal 217 249. Putra, D.B.E., Choanji, T., 2016. Preliminary Analysis of Slope Stability in Kuok and Surrounding Areas. J. Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology 1, 41 44. Prata, Rizky. 2011. Geologi Daerah Sikalang dan Sekitarnya Kecamatan Barangin Kotamadya Sawahlunto Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Bandung. hal 33 68. Silitonga P.H. dan Kastowo., 1995, Peta Geologi Lembar Solok Sumatera, Peta Geologi bersistem Sumatera, PPPG, Bandung. Situmorang, B., Yulihanto, B., Guntur, A., Himawan, R.S., dan Jacob T.G., 1991, Structural Basin Development of the Ombilin Basin, Proceedings Indonesian Petroleum Association 10 th Annual Convetion, hal 217 249. Suryadi, Adi. 2016. Fault Analysis to Determine Deformation History of Kubang Pasu Formation 52 Jannah, M. et al./ JGEET Vol 02 No 01/2017 at South of UniMAP Stadium Hill, Ulu Pauh, Perlis, Malaysia. Journal Geology Engineering Environmental and Technology (JGEET), Pekanbaru, Riau. Vol. 1 Woodcock, N. H. dan Fischer, M. 1986.Strike-slip duplexes. J. Struct. Geol., vol. 8, p. 725 735, DOI: 10.1016/0191-8141(86)90021-0. Van Bemmelen, R.W., 1949, The Geology of Indonesia vol. 1 A. Government Printing Office, The Hague, MartinusNijhoff, vol. 1 A Netherlands. 1. Introduction 2. General Geology and Stratigraphy 3. Methodology 4. Geological Structure on the Study Area 4.1 Faults 4.2 Folds 4.3 Joints 5. Discussion 6. Conclusion 7. Acknowledgements