microsoft word tai.docx corresponding author: dr. nancy j. moules email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics april 22, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 editorial: aletheia remembering and enlivening nancy j moules dedicated to dr. tyrone dang (april 19, 1956 november 10, 2014) in choosing the cover of our new book, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015), we wanted to showcase a word that seems to be at the heart of hermeneutic work. the word that came to mind was the ancient greek word aletheia. aletheia is a word that is about unconcealment. the word is the opposite of lethal (dead) – aletheia then means to enliven. it is also connected to the mythical river of lethe in hades: the river of forgetfulness – a river that, if crossed, erased memory. aletheia is the antithesis of this: it is about remembering. in its unconcealment, enlivening, and remembering, aletheia brings moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 2 2 home what may have been lost, forgotten, deadened, or concealed in our “simply getting by.” the work of hermeneutics is the work of aletheia. i have a friend that i have known and loved for close to 30 years. he was an award winning family physician and internist in hawaii and he is also one of the fathers of my godson, thanh. ty had a most interesting history. some of his “stories” i have heard over time and i am sure that they have shifted and changed in my mind as all good stories should. i do not then offer this editorial as a biography on his life but rather a “remembering” of him and an unconcealment of the story of him in my mind and experience. ty lived in vietnam with his siblings and his parents. he was the 8th of 10 children. during the vietnam war and the fall of saigon, ty and his parents and siblings experienced famine, abuse, and incarceration. ty himself tried to escape many times and was caught and sent back to jail. his sisters and brothers escaped in awful circumstances under torture of thai pirates and other perils. ty, like eight of his siblings, made it to the united states and from there he pursued degrees in pharmacology and medicine, finally settling in honolulu where he adopted and coparented his son, thanh, from vietnam. ty’s escape from vietnam and his rescue by a german fisherman has been documented in newspapers. his story from childhood to adulthood has been retold in other forms and i had the privilege of receiving hundreds of reflective emails from ty about his life experience and how he looks on it now. what mattered always to him was family. i offer this one. our fourth attempt to escape from vietnam. ma had arranged for me, phuc, hoa, and his wife may, to leave. quick goodbye, in the dark of night, shiny tears like pearls in ma's eyes, looking at her sons. not one, but three pieces of her guts, blood were torn, not in succession, but altogether. bye, ma. i am in a lot of pain, too. we got into a trap soon after we left home. the troubling, vicious red light circling the ocean dark, like red blood pulsating from an open wound, appeared, closer and closer. then stopped, the ocean seemed all red. my heart sank when they boarded our boat. phuc took a beating for being the oldest. the pacific now had ma's blood in it. we were still in handcuffs when the sun rose above the thatch hut where we spent the night. a long yellow school bus is awaiting. time seemed still, stretching in the denied reality. and we were taken to a place called b5, the notorious re-education camp outside of saigon. for the next six months, we spent our time in the inner camp to be interrogated. we were separated in different sections. phuc threw the last glance at us, the younger brothers, loving and pained looks... i am so sorry, so sorry... i did not see him and hoa again for a while... moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 2 3 by october, i was shaved, completely diseased (scabies, typhoid etc.) and no more information to extract out of a 90 lbs. body, ma and ba bought our way out to the labor camp section of b5. the table in the visit room was rough, as wide as an ocean, ma sat there. she looked at me, wordless, tearful, the soft, round teardrops that were sharp, tearing me inside too, ma. we shared the same guts, face, heart, even the laughter. december 1979, we came home. ma’s hair had turned silver from black. an eight-month insomnia, punctured with the sound of mango leaves touching the ground. ma would get up thinking they were our footsteps coming home night after night. the house seemed cold and big. i crawled underneath the bed and slept there for the next two months, fearing the nightmares of the camp would come and take me in my sleep. and again, i left saigon. april 1981, on the day ma brought me into this world, i became a refugee in malaysia. tears of joy, ma, and a few black hairs back in the jungle of white, funereal hairs. phuc is now gone, and i am here thinking about what ma must have felt as a mother, each and single heartbeat, every time disaster struck... have you ever regretted bringing me into this world that was full of deaths, destruction and sufferings? suffering no more, phuc is gone, so is ma. the last of her i saw in a dream, black hair cascading like waterfall, spinning on one foot, and smiling at me. i hope that was where phuc belongs now, with ma/ba. he came home. before tai was diagnosed, he purchased a beautiful home in hawaii kai, which he remodeled. he told me he wanted this to be his family’s “ancestral home” – a place where his family was welcomed and that held the ground of honoring the past, remembering the past, and unconcealing the pain. i told him that what he was doing reminded me of aletheia and he loved the idea, so much that he ordered a sign to be in his home. in his hawaii kai home, this sign was as you entered the door of his home. moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 2 4 ty was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in april 2013 – april mattered to him – it was the month he was born, the month he left vietnam, the month his mom died, the month he was diagnosed, the month he was told he was in remission. he would never die in april; he died on november 10, 2014, while at work at his family practice office, which he never gave up. ty was mischievous. he was a coyote and a raven. he knew hermes intimately. he could make the best of us blush. but he always saw and spoke truth, for what it is. ty knew the hermeneutic call of aletheia. a part of the reason that we live in this world is to experience the terrible hermeneutic angst of remembering. there are times we wish to swim the river lethe and forget, and there are times we are afraid we already have and we clamour to reclaim what is lost from memory. there are things we wish would no longer live and things we want to keep alive forever. in hermeneutic understanding, we know that things must be awakened, recalled, remembered, and suffered. it is why we embrace with “trembling and fear” (with all due respect to kierkegaard) that which we have to be prepared to meet in this kind of research. we have to face the living presence of what we come to suffer or as kearney and caputo suggest – a preparedness to meet the stranger at the door who may be kind or may be a monster. there is hospitality to aletheia – an openness to what might come to, and maybe enter, the door. last week, i received a package from hawaii with the sign enclosed the same week that our book went to press. the sign hangs now just inside the front door of my home. thank you ty. i remember you. microsoft word jardine editorial corrected proof.docx corresponding author: dr. david w. jardine email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 24, 2024 ©the author(s) 2014 guest editorial this is why we read. this is why we write david w. jardine discussion bears fruit. the participants part from one another as changed beings. the individual perspectives with which they entered upon the discussion have been transformed, and so they have been transformed themselves. this, then, is a kind of progress—not the progress proper to research but rather a progress that always must be renewed in the effort of our living. h.g. gadamer (2007, p. 244) from hermeneutics as a practical philosophy. in response to reading jodi latremouille’s “my treasured relation,” christine mciver, ceo and founder of kid’s cancer care foundation of alberta who lost her son, derek, to cancer, sent the following email to dr. nancy moules, this journal’s editor: the piece by jodi latremouille. i read a lot of this stuff, so much it’s in danger of becoming a blur. this is exceptional. i am going to share it with our staff if that is okay. she writes exactly how i think. in paragraphs full of description and illustration – and then words that hit the moment. i was surprised at the moment of shelby’s death, i was overcome again with the very same pain and sadness as when derek died. this writing…it is so good. illustrates the journey perfectly. it needs to be seen. there is, here, something deeply recognizable to those of us who work with the living and the dying and the dead, something that nebulously defines being part of a profession. it is something we need to admit because its admission is a vehicle to its remedy—“ a progress that always must be renewed in the effort of our living.” there is a certain ennui here, something like having experienced too much, having seemingly heard it all before, something like the exhaustion of efforts to name this pain, this suffering, and how language itself seems to start to wear thin and then wear on you over time, wear you out. this is the secret lot of nurses and teachers, of parents and doctors--perhaps a secret lot of being human itself. the effort of our living can lose its power jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 editorial 1 2 to renew. we can become halt and the glow of language that once bound us together in commiseration can burn out, and us with it. we lose our avail. i’m reminded of this passage from david g. smith: “education is suffering from narration-sickness,” says paulo freire. it speaks out of a story, which was once full of enthusiasm, but now shows itself incapable of a surprise ending. the nausea of narration-sickness comes from having heard enough, of hearing many variations on a theme but no new theme. (smith, 1999, pp. 135-136) why do we write emails in response to reading jodi latremouille’s work? why am i compelled to write about earth cousins and now this little editorial? this compulsion is part of why attention is given in truth and method (gadamer, 1989, p. 60) to “[immanuel] kant's doctrine of the heightening of the feeling of life (lebensgefühl).” despite gadamer's detailed caveats about this notion, it is one of the deep sources of hermeneutic work, percolating up through husserl's ideas of lived experience and the life world. part of the orbit of hermeneutic research is to revive in writers and readers the possibilities of our commiseration. hans-georg gadamer (1986, p. 59) called it the opening up of “free spaces” and learning, in consequence, how we might then shape our lives in light of such possibilities, forging, if you will, “new solidarities” (p. 59). this, then, is the other clue i got from christine's email about why we read, why we write, why this journal--the hit, the moment. this is the aesthesis of aesthetics, as james hillman (2006, p. 36) noted, “which means at root a breathing in or taking in of the world, the gasp, “aha,” the “uh” of the breath in wonder, shock, amazement, and aesthetic response.” hermeneutics lingers about the in-breath where something hits us and wakes us up out of our melancholia over the wearying sameness of things. it is where our living can become spacious and open and full of possibility again, and we no longer feel locked into the often-panicky confines and immediacies of our circumstances. this, too, is why some writing can be properly called beautiful, that is, precipitating of such aesthetic arrival even when it speaks of sad departure. references gadamer, h.g. (1986). the idea of the university--yesterday, today, tomorrow. in d. misgeld & g. nicholson (eds. & trans.), hans-georg gadamer on education, poetry, and history: applied hermeneutics (pp. 47-62). albany, ny: suny press. gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed., j. weinsheimer & d.g marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h.g. (2007). hermeneutics as practical philosophy. in r.e. palmer (ed.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 227-245). evanston, il: northwestern university press. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 editorial 1 3 hillman, j. (2006). anima mundi: returning the soul to the world. in j. hillman, city and soul (pp. 27-49). putnam, ct: spring. smith, d.g. (1999). pedagon: interdisciplinary essays on pedagogy and culture. new york, ny: peter lang. microsoft word old dog, same trick.docx corresponding author: david w. jardine university of calgary email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics november 26, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 guest editorial: old dog. same trick. david w. jardine your cause of sorrow must not be measured by his worth, for then it hath no end. ross to siward, on the death of siward's son. macbeth, act v, scene viii give sorrow words: the grief that does not speak whispers the o'er-fraught heart and bids it break. malcolm to macduff. macbeth, act iv, scene iii “the individual case . . . is never simply a case; it is not exhausted by being a particular example of a universal law or concept” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 39). there is no such a “thing” as sorrow or grief. it is always this lamenting in this arc of telling, of seasons, of breath and faces. to paraphrase john caputo (1993), sorrow always involves proper names; grieving is always one's own and, one way or another, in one shape or another, “from it no one can be exempt” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 356). that we might commiserate in such matters is not made possible by each of us deflecting upwards into some governing concept or essence or law or theme under which our sorrows fall. my sorrow does not find much voice or relief in such falling. it is not given words but is taken away and rendered and handed back as bones. “the rule does not comprehend it” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 39). we don’t experience our affinity via this abstracting route. commiseration cannot be sought in experiencing ourselves as examples or instances. affinity is, instead, a lateral pass, one of kinship, kindness, love. in these matters, i am always, for good or ill, someone, full of gesture jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 editorial 2 2 and just this word and withholding and waiting and perhaps embrace. and just this error of having waited too long full of good intent. all this. i find myself nearly apologizing to some of the people who’ve read this. this work is hard to bear and, if it works (and it doesn't always work, and its working is in the hands of those to whom it is addressed), it’s hard to put down. and i’ll admit that there is a resounding joy to it precisely because of this. “free spaces” (gadamer, 1992, p. 59) and some relief, some lifting and lightening, some setting it down by taking it up and setting it down in words. so yesterday, november 3, 2014. father and grown daughter outside the bragg creek vet’s place, big and old great pyrenees on a leash, matted and woolly and friendly and black and white. big splayed paws a good six inches across. well trod and often. inside to buy dog food, and, i’d say by her age and carriage, a woman and wife and mother, a bit in tears as she and the doctor emerge from a side room. yep. got it. it’s time, it seems. and that semblance swirls up and around in the air. made sure i stopped on the way back to the truck to tell the old thing that he’s a good dog. a little unspoken thanks. you need to thank your teachers, but the best thanks is turning away and practicing the teaching. the language of this intimacy is a rough ride. every pull towards generalities feels like a betrayal and yet i must give sorrow words. i can “identify” with that spot these neighbors seem to be in, but that word is too easy to use, too flip. part of it is the coming due of the silent bargain some of us have made with these domestics. i remember a black-humored version laughed over years ago with friends: “don't worry. when the time comes, i will kill you.” hah! yes. i will. i promise. i can identify with the spot they are in precisely because of how we are identical. our cases are incommensurate and that is how we are the same. that is how each new case is an act of revival and rejuvenation, not just repetition. that is how our kinship remains alive, there in that unspoken parking lot. our kinship is not identity under a rule but is had in, and through, the incommensurate and stubborn grace of particularity. we lean towards. we hear beckons. we are properly stilled and summoned. this child, this patient, this turn of phrase in a text, this upwell of warm air coming up off the wood for winter, that old fido full of specific fidelities and keeps of memory, makes me stop over it and wait for what is to come. thus our cases, each intimate, need names and faces and occasions to be what they are. sit. stay. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 editorial 2 3 ivy. that was my dog’s name. ivy, right there all over again, up and run in that chance morning meeting of pets and coos and matted feet and leash pulled taut in the air of coming grief. ivy’s flesh being only half torn to bits by an inefficient cougar that didn’t finish the job. the weight of her in my arms, tipping back in blood and glazed look and the sizzle-panic nickelspittle rush for what turned out to be useless help. my being drawn to this morning event is thus a lateral pass. it is not a passage through some shared “identity,” but a passage into the passible kinship of the flesh, the eyes that see ghosts shimmering around and nearing from all directions, the big long nose arced up and sniffing something in the air. beheld in my arms. my bones start tearing, but hush now. there is a secret pleasure here, too, to be near this happenstance, this teaching, this moment, and to write in order to stay near and draw others near. say it, then. almost jealousy. that they have such luck to have such proximity to such a great teacher. good boy. i remember after ivy was half-killed and we had to put her down. that’s such a phrase. it summons gravity and the falling of flesh to the earth. but it also says that we had to put her down, because if we didn’t put her down we couldn’t bear the weight of it. and those post-traumatic reveries, still close and fraught and suddening, still imagining her running towards me down off the green hill, and having to say, again: “no, ivy. go.” good girl. references caputo, j. (1993) against ethics: contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. bloomington, in: indiana state university press. gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method. new york, ny: continuum books. gadamer, h.g. (1992). the idea of the university--yesterday, today, tomorrow (pp. 47-62). in d. misgeld & g. nicholson (eds. & trans.), hans-georg gadamer on education, poetry, and history: applied hermeneutics. albany, ny: suny. microsoft word jardine corrected proof.docx corresponding author: dr. david w. jardine email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 24, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 some introductory words for two little earth-cousins david w. jardine out from behind his oxygen mask as if he were just my good old, familiar little earth-cousin. from jodi latremouille, “my treasured relation” cancer really is one of “those” words. two days ago, an old friend, fernando, died of it, and the funeral is this thursday, january 23rd--lung cancer come down hard and fast, as it often does. and then there's me at 8 years old and my mother, 1958, undergoing a radical mastectomy. drawn living room curtains for weeks, a big wicker laundry basket full of neighbors’ tiny presents, one to be opened each day, smells of soaps and lotions and other notions, meant to help stretch out time’s lingering, i guess, and to show wee affections without words, without “that” word. easy to recall how many had to disappear from view, unable to be present to such things. understandable in its own sad way. makes my own skin lesions over the past couple of years seem quite silly in comparison, not only because they are less severe and the suffering is near nil (although hearing “that” word chills nevertheless), but because, at the level of our living and dying, cancer is always incomparable. it follows an old gadamerian (1989, p. 39) adage: “the individual case . . .is not exhausted by being a particular example of a universal law or concept.” my doctor and i joked about how this could be some sort of long-in-arriving anniversary--maybe even the summer of 1958, too much sun swimming at the second tower with my brother and father in burlington, and the great peels of skin afterwards. funny how cancer takes its time sometimes, sometimes as fleet as the quick of life itself, and sometimes, well, as sheer chance would have it, my mother lived till 2002. of course, as jodi latremouille’s wonderful, heartbreaking writing “my treasured relation” demonstrates, broad, universal concepts and images and ideas are always needed in the act of jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 1 2 articulating one's experience. we always run the risk of using words that can be understood differently than we meant. this circumstance is in the very nature of writing and reading itself and it is why the mens auctoris is not the lynchpin of hermeneutic work (gadamer, 2007, p. 57). it is also why hermeneutic research is so bloody difficult. you have to be disciplined and rigorous and attentive to handle this circumstance gracefully and well. remaining true to the intimacy of this “special case” (gadamer, 1989, p. 39), dear shelby, is an especially difficult form of research that requires generosity, patience, perseverance, discipline, stillness and wisdom (6 aspired to “perfections,” [sanskrit: paramitas; see tsong-kha-pa, 2000, 2002, 2004]). all clustered, of course, around impermanence. “we will have to hold firmly to the standpoint of finiteness” (gadamer, 1989, p. 99), both in the topics we consider and in the expended breath of our consideration itself. why? because the topic of a hermeneutic study is finite as is our insight into it. “future generations will understand differently” (p. 340) and therefore, the purpose of a hermeneutic inquiry is to “keep [the topic] open for the future” (p. 340). we already know this. cancer will never leave our consciousness. there are myriad ways of experiencing it, articulating it, investigating it, naming it, and these have cascaded down to us over time, admixed, sometimes battling each other, sometimes quelled, finally, in the soft presence of death. we can never say once and for all what needs to be said, and the worlds of swimming and breast cancer in 1958 have turned out to be something different than we could have imagined. “it would be a poor hermeneuticist who thought he could have, or had to have, the last word” (gadamer, 1989a, p. 579). in this sense, “my treasured relation” is hermeneutic in its best light. it is intent on remaining true to the “stubborn particularity” (wallace, 1987) of the case while, at the same time, drawing us into the worlds of its orbit in which we, as readers, already live. and, at once, it casts us back on our own life in this troubled life world--all this with an eye to both the opening this topic and “find[ing] that opening in each of us” (wallace, 1987, p. 13), as readers, where we can experience our own “miraculous returns” (p. 13) to the lives we have already been leading. this complex and pitched spiral of effects that defines the rigorousness of hermeneutic inquiry has an axis. its goal is to remain true to its object, and jodi latremouille's writing finds this sweet and aching spot. it seeks the address of this case and that's what compels our attention and makes this compelling break out beyond the confines of the case to something that feels universal. but this is no longer a slippery universal full of romantic woozyness. it is a universal that has been, in the best senses, humiliated by the case. life. childhood. illness. relations. suffering. all these become disciplined and strengthened by the case itself. “it is truly an achievement of undemonstrable tact to hit the target and to discipline the application of the universal” (gadamer, 1989, pp. 39-40). without this discipline of application, phrases like “childhood leukemia” loses the function of “responding and summoning” (gadamer, 1989, p. 458). they become hard categories of illness, and our responses to them become subjectivized into nothing but “moist gastric intimacy” (sartre, 1970, p. 4). these are the two extremes that hermeneutics avoids, and the two degradations that it can fall into when it fails. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 1 3 jodi latremouille's work thus reminds us of a hermeneutic truth, that one must avoid the temptations of casting our eyes too high. and, as with another recent piece of writing (latremouille, in press), her work reminds us, too, of another feature of hermeneutics: to be properly understood and articulated,. . . locales of intimacy don't lend themselves to forms of research that demand generalities or methodological anonymity as is proper to various social sciences. they demand a form of research that is proper to the object of its concern--an old aristotelian idea, that knowledge must “remain something adapted to the object, a mensuratio ad rem” (gadamer, 1989, p. 261). (jardine, in press) a good interpretation must be adapted to the object it is considering. pediatric oncology can be understood as a medical condition and, understood as such it summons a certain way of writing/speaking/investigating that is proper to that object. but the cancer of a child is also understandable as a sphere of treasured relations filled with this child and no other. this is also what it is. in this case, precisely as in the case of medical research, good writing seeks its proper measure in this object of consideration. there is no battle here between types of research and all that worn-out piffle about qualitative and quantitative. one of these is not the “secret measure” (gadamer, 1989, p. 112) of the other. both forms of writing and research are “objective” in the sense that both seek to cleave properly to the object each is considering. both seek to do justice to the thing and bring it to an illumination proper to it. both therefore are “hermeneutic” in the sense that they both heed the demand of the mensuratio ad rem. differently put, not only is all oncology hermeneutic (moules, jardine, mccaffrey, & brown, 2013). cancer, as it actually lives in the world (of families, of medicine, of nursing, of philosophy, of economics, of the tremors felt over diagnosis, of the bedsides, of the ways the word can find air in some settings of fear and trembling) is myriad in its being. it therefore requires myriad articulations in order to be properly understood in its fulsome being. “only in the multifariousness of such voices does it exist” (gadamer, 1989, p. 284). hermeneutic work always involves the application of particular cases to the universals (concepts, images, hopes, desires, ideas, rules, laws, principles, themes, procedures, guidelines, expectations voice and unvoiced, and so on) that have come to guide our lives, demanding of them that they listen to the difference that the case portends and don't turn away to heavenly, self-enclosed ideation (jardine, 2013). but it involves another form of application. “understanding always involves something like applying the text to be understood to the interpreter’s present situation” (gadamer, 1989, p. 308). in reading this paper, i’m blessed with the meeting of these two earthcousins that make me remember that i, too, and however near or distant, am a third earth cousin in this fatal round. interpretive work is meant to be read interpretively. read this and let yourself be third. references gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed., j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 1 4 gadamer, h.g. (2007). classical and philosophical hermeneutics. in r.e. palmer (ed.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings, (pp. 41-71). evanston, il: northwestern university press. jardine, d. (2013). guest editorial: morning thoughts on application. journal of applied hermeneutics. retrieved from http://jah.synergiesprairies.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/52. jardine, d. (in press). in appreciation of modern hunting traditions and a grouse’s life unwasted. one world in dialogue. moules, n.j., jardine, d.w., mccaffrey, g., & brown, c. (2013). “isn’t all oncology hermeneutic?” journal of applied hermeneutics. retrieved from http://jah.synergiesprairies.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/43. latremouille, j. (in press). a modern hunting tradition. one world in dialogue. sartre, j.p. (1970). intentionality: a fundamental idea in husserl’s phenomenology. journal for the british society for phenomenology, 1(2), 3-5. tsong-kha-pa (2000). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume one. ithaca, ny: snow lion. tsong-kha-pa (2002). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume three. ithaca, ny: snow lion. tsong-kha-pa (2004). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume two. ithaca, ny: snow lion. wallace, b. (1989). the stubborn particulars of grace. toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. microsoft word latremouille corrected proof.docx corresponding author: jodi latremouille email: jodilats@gmail.com journal of applied hermeneutics january 24, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 my treasured relation jodi latremouille i have always wanted to write about my cousin shelby, but whenever i try, the words just don’t seem to do justice to my cousin who never grew up. i want to make him live again in this story. but mostly, i would just really like to not cry today. shelby was born to my aunt, with too much life ahead of her, and so he was raised by my silentstoic, gentle grandfather, dave and leona, the asthmatic, arthritic heart-young grandmother, with more love in her than those sick lungs could handle. this little boy was never formally diagnosed, as he never got the opportunity to spend much time in school, but looking back now, i know that he did indeed have certain cognitive delays, which i did not, and still cannot, name. nor do i want to. socially-constructed deficiencies are not lovable. to me, he was just shelby, even though on that level beyond the one that we talk about, we all knew that he didn’t function in quite the same way we all did. shelby was diagnosed with something, though. he was diagnosed with leukemia at the age of five. his childhood years were a blur for all of us. waiting and hoping, trips to vancouver through the fraser canyonand later, over the coquihalla, stays at the ronald mcdonald house, fundraising projects, months in isolation units, missed school, missed life, latremouille journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 2 2 hours and hours stalking and thrashing in the shallow end of the backyard pool: daring us to venture near him. a wheelchair-bound, abbreviated trip to disneyland, make-a-wish dream visits with hulk hogan and trevor linden, birthday pizzas delivered by none other than raphael the teenage mutant ninja turtle, and a failed autologous bone marrow transplant. we were told that shelby was going to receive a “miracle cure,” a treatment that my 11-year-old brain understood in the following terms: the doctors would take a massive needle that would suck the bone marrow from his spine, purge it of cancer cells with radiation, and return it back to his body with another massive needle, with the expectation that the healthy bone marrow would regenerate and grow, filling his spine with healthy bone marrow. my sister and i have always wondered if our matching needle phobias were inspired by bearing witness to our cousin’s medical treatments. i learned the language of platelets and prednisone and blood counts and spinal taps and we-still-have-hope and in/remission/out and chemo and things-are-not-looking good and be-nicer-he’s-sick and making time count. no, wait a minute time counted us by appointments and remissions and birthdays and good days bad days and one more day. we counted everything except time. i now understand this “miracle cure” autologous bone marrow transplant the way the doctors and all the adults in the room did, as what it was in those days, as more of a “last ditch experimental treatment.” shelby spent three months in complete isolation while the bone marrow was being purged of cancer cells. in order to visit him, we had to wash our hands to the elbow with stinging, sharp-smelling disinfectant soap, walk through the sliding door into the closet-sized “isolation chamber,” wash our hands again for several minutes, don plastic shoe coverings, plastic clothing, and face masks, then enter through a second sliding door, careful, fearful, not to get too close. we could touch his hand, but hugs were out of the question. we just couldn’t risk it. he was my alien-cousin, a lovable monster descended from another planet, participating in an experimental study, peering out from behind his oxygen mask. then i would hear his muffled, cheerful gravelly voice, saying “hi, jode!” as if he were just my good old, familiar little earth-cousin. at latremouille journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 2 3 age ten, he was much more subdued, resigned to the treatments, than he had been in the early years. six-year-old tornado. “i am a dinosaur and i am going to smash you!” pierced. “i am a lion and i am going to eat you!” swearing. “shit! i hate you!” despising his cruel saviours. “i am jake the snake and i am going to do a d.d.t. right on your head!” restrained. “i am going to ride my snowmobile all the way back to merritt and you will never find me again!” my sister and i spent many hours with shelby through the years, his contracted playmates, and i think our company probably was one of the reasons my grandmother was able to maintain some semblance of sanity. he was a challenging kid to begin with, prone to temper tantrums and boiling-over fits of anger. and having to be stuck with needles, of varying diameters, on a daily basis, was, and still is, unfathomable to me. anyone who had to go through all of that would, understandably, be just a little “on edge.” my mother would send us over to grandma’s house every day after school until we became too busy with our extracurricular lives; in the later years we would squeeze in weekend sleepovers and pool parties when we could. the two girls would play duck hunter and super mario brothers for hours and hours on end, while shelby wrestled in the background with his stuffed animals and teenage mutant ninja turtle figurines, shouting out the play-by-play, occasionally jumping off the couch and squashing us flat-out under his roly-poly body, making us gasp under his weight, begging to be freed, to breathe again. on the day of my 8th birthday party, all of my friends had come over to celebrate. of course, shelby was invited. it was a glorious spring day at the “fox farm,” our 5-acre mountainside hobby farm, perfect for badminton on the lawn and hikes up the mountain to the magical forest. my father had installed a rope swing in the woods about 200 metres above the house. all of the kids were taking turns. one of the less experienced “city slickers” lost his grip and launched himself into space, then landed softly, unbelievably, gracefully, like a ski-jumper on the steep landing slope, sliding down the leaf-strewn mountainside straight into an anthill. one girl forgot the only safety rule (to launch yourself away from the tree in a circular trajectory), and flew straight out from the tree, then straight back in, smashing into the tree trunk. we watched her float in slow-motion horror, and then cringed in sympathy, shielding our eyes and turning away, wincing at the inevitable “thud.” we turned back and peeled our hands from our eyes to watch her loosen her grip and slither listlessly off the rope into a weeping heap at the base of the tree. only two casualties this time. not bad. shelby was down at the house, as it was too difficult for him to hump all the way up the sidehill to the rope swing. i am pretty sure that what we did that day was my idea. one of us ran down to the house to grab a bottle of ketchup. we chose a “victim,” smeared the ketchup on her, and started hollering. “shelby, help! tracy fell off the rope swing and she’s bleeding!” i heard him, latremouille journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 2 4 out of sight near the house, yelling, “what? oh no! i’m coming, jode!” and we were all snickering and jeering, until we saw him emerge over the hill, panting and crying, wheezing, tripping over sticks, stumbling up, knees dirty, nose running. distraught. our laughter froze instantly to silence. he had brought a tea towel. i didn’t know what he thought he was going to do with that. i guess… i suppose… that was the funny part. it was just a joke. for his 10th birthday, our family bought him a funny little voice-activated yellow plastic sunflower in a funny little plastic green pot that danced a herky-jerky hula, its funny little happy sunglassed face bobbing along to the mini pops singing their funny little-kid version of “karma chameleon.” that flower was cool, man. totally rocked that song. in order to get it into the room we had to unwrap and open up the package, then wipe down every single surface with the disinfectant, including the batteries. the nurses brought it in for him, as that day he was having a “bad immune system day.” we smiled through the window as he tried it out, grinning from cheek to soft, chubby cheek. we could see him laughing through the glass, and in my head i could hear his hoarse, breathless chortle. my mom picked out that flower for him. i am sure she thought it would cheer him up. it did; she nailed it out of the park. he loved that flower. all the days of his life. because you should never grow out of silly little things. shelby finally did make his escape. we were called in to visit him in the hometown merritt hospital. i knew it was bad, because any self-respecting version of hope would have bundled him up in her arms and magically swooped him all the way back up and over the winter-blizzard highway to vancouver children’s hospital. bloated, drained, cushioned by crisp white pillows and our false cheerfulness. distracted by niceties and pain. we, the kids, protected, excluded. unaware but still knowing. just a short visit. tired. ready. calm. barely eleven years old. selfless. raspy. “have fun skiing tomorrow, jode.” big, soft, squishy, forever hug. latremouille journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 2 5 we knew things were bad when we were allowed to hug him. wait, hold it, hold on, for him. cry in the backseat on the way home. look out the foggy window at the hazy, unending night. shelby died on a blowing-snow january night, at the age of 11. i was 12 years old. i got my first menstrual period the day of the funeral. what a day for firsts. i wasn’t particularly afraid or ashamed, as some young girls were back in the days before moms were supposed to be a girl’s best friend and talk about, oh, about just absolutely everything! i had read about it in a book somewhere, and had some “samples” stashed in my bathroom cupboard. i was just, oh, just annoyed, awkward and lonely. i just wasn’t ready to grow up, not just yet. shelby’s neighbour and best friend in the whole entire world, a mature young woman-ish, kind, gentle 12-year old robyn, who didn’t have to be his friend, with two perfect, large fake front teeth that got knocked out years ago in a biking accident riding down “suicide hill” by our neighbourhood school, who felt-penned a massive “hulkamania!” poster for shelby’s best-day-ever and who probably got her period (light-years) months before me, and who i imagined would know exactly how to handle her newfound womanhood gracefully, (she didn’t. she told me so years later.) was beside herself after she returned from viewing his body. his vancouver canucks jerseyed, google-eyeballed disneyland-goofy capped, painless body. “that’s the first time in his life that he has ever been alone.” she wanted to wait with him in that room until the service began. our great-aunt was asked to perform the eulogy, and my narrow little 12-year old self was disappointed in the choice, expecting that she just way too stuffy and stodgy to do my hilarious, ridiculous, lovely little cousin justice. my mom had written the eulogyoh, it was just so perfect and i didn’t want it spoiled by someone who didn’t know him just the way we did. i think back now and realize that my pin-curled aunt was probably the only one in the entire jam-packed room of 300 people who was tightly wound enough to hold it together for the entire speech. latremouille journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 2 6 and she re-called him to a “t”. a “d.d.t.,” that is: “i know that shelby is up there in heaven, riding his snowmobile and doing d.d.t.’s on all the angels.” shelby was the exception. to everything. he was the beautiful little monster who reflected back to us who we really were. we were rude, wild, loud, unfiltered, imaginative, hungry, hurting, scared-cruel dreamers. that is what love does. it makes us want to do justice. without justice we are merely co-existing. waiting for the reward. labelling. judgingand moving on. i will never move on. i want to make him live again. my treasured teacher. my relation. alien-cousin. brother. heart-swelling baby dinosaur. lion. hulk. bio jodi latremouille is a graduate student in the werklund school of education at the university of calgary. she is an entrepreneur and a social studies and literacy teacher. microsoft word editorial.docx corresponding author: dr. n. j. moules faculty of nursing, university of calgary calgary, ab email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics december 10, 2011 the author(s) 2011 editorial on applied hermeneutics and the work of the world nancy j. moules, graham mccaffrey, angela c. morck, & david w. jardine the journal of applied hermeneutics features the work of hermeneutics in its application to the lived realities of our professional and personal lives. as cited in our homepage, at its best, hermeneutics is not about hermeneutics. it is when hermeneutics is actually put to work through the act of interpreting something that its strengths and character appear. our intent is that the journal will offer the opportunity to publish work that reflects the subtlety and suppleness of engaging a topic anew and making it visible in the work of application. we believe that hermeneutics is always at its best when it disappears and living topics show up in all their complexity and ambiguity. hermeneutics, as a philosophy, has been studied and enacted for years from theological, theoretical, methodological, historical, and philosophical lenses. for the past several decades, practices such as nursing, education, social work and psychology, to name a few, have been turning their attention to hermeneutics as a way to explore these complexities. in education, for example, hermeneutics began in earnest with the reconceptualist movement in the early 1970s (e.g. pinar 1975/2000) and the work of maxine greene (e.g. 1971), which went back to the late 1960s. in nursing, in north america, hermeneutics was taken up as a research approach since the 1980s by some beginning thinkers such as allen (1995), benner (1985,1994), chesla (1995), and diekelmann, allen, and tanner (1989), yet threads of hermeneutics have always been situated in nursing thought and practice. engaging hermeneutics as a research approach holds an inherent sensibility with these practice disciplines. nursing, social work, education, and psychology have always been intrinsically interpretive in the nature of their practices. this is not necessarily a methodological claim, but a substantive one. research and practice, at their core are “socially structured, meaning-generating and perspective dependent” pursuits (allen, 1995, p. 181). they share a deep kinship or in other words a “double hermeneutic necessity” (p. 181) that co-exist interdependently. this does not diminish, negate, or limit the need for other methodological considerations. rather, the moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 vol. 1 2 claim of this journal is simple and slightly audacious: whatever methodology we choose or are required to choose to study the ins and outs of our respective professions, our day to day work is itself hermeneutic in character. as practitioners, we are situated in the middle of ongoing and multifarious negotiations of mutual and self-understanding, and understanding is necessarily connected to interpretation (gadamer, 1989). the kinds of discretion that are called forth in our practices are about making sense of particulars, putting them in context, assigning relevance and meaning, and acting on the implications of that meaning. this is an interpretive practice that occurs in a shifting in-between, in the middle of relationships, contexts, and particularities. as such, practitioners are brokers of understanding (moules, 2000). for example, in nursing, there is no such thing as an uninterpreted observation. even the measure of an elevated blood pressure is contextualized. is the patient anxious, in pain, upset? educators, therapists, psychologists, social workers, and nurses innately are always in the process of contextualizing, appreciating that “facts are not separate from the meaning of facts” (walsh, 1996, p. 233). understanding occurs through language and in tradition (walsh, 1996), and practice disciplines have long known this interpretive tradition. “interpretation is an interaction between a historically produced text and a historically produced reader” (allen, 1995, p. 175). nurses, for example, recognize the importance of history how a disease developed, what symptoms came first, and when and they know how to “read” this history into its current context of particularities. hermeneutic understanding enables us both to value history in this complex, clinical sense, and to go further to consider what it might mean to “take” another’s history or to explore what is included or excluded by our histories. educators, too, know that students as well as teachers come to school with complex and mixed personal and family histories and ancestries. more than this, however, the knowledge entrusted to and explored by students and teachers in schools is itself a complex of living ancestries. coming to teach and learn in ways that do justice to these complexities faces students and teachers alike with an ongoing hermeneutic task, or according to kearney, a hermeneutic wager: how to take up the wealth of the world’s knowledge in all of its often contradictory complexity and not betray it with the simplicities of the old, tired industrial model of education. differently put, nursing and education, to use these two sites as examples, are, in their very practices, deeply interpretive disciplines wherein the work of something like hermeneutics is already at work. moreover, both of these disciplines have been faced directly with the co-opting of these interpretive practices by the technologies of medicalization on the one hand and the often-angry vagaries of “tradition education” on the other. therefore, the kinds of knowledge that come from hermeneutic research is knowledge that can be obtained, appreciated, and used by practice professionals, for we can have access to this kind of knowledge, and more importantly, we can know what to do with it, given practice legacies of interpretive wisdom. this coming to know is itself a legacy of practices that must be practiced in order for us to become practiced in them. it is not that these disciplines have decided that hermeneutics is a viable research methodology among others for studying their practices. it is that these disciplines have recognized that their practices are already deeply hermeneutic. the discipline of hermeneutics, with all of its long histories of controversy, contention, imagination, and thought, thus provides these practice disciplines with a form of self-articulation, clarification, and questioning that is already amenable to how such disciplines live and work in moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 vol. 1 3 the world. hermeneutics also provides detailed critiques of the inadequacies of natural science models of thinking and understanding to such lived practices. this recognition of an inner kinship is how “applied” is to be understood in the term “applied hermeneutics” drs. nancy johnston, deborah mcleod, and nancy moules established the canadian hermeneutic institute in 2009, with its inaugural 3-day meeting in halifax, nova scotia, canada. the intent of the institute was to bring together scholars of hermeneutics and hermeneutic research across disciplines in creative dialogue and conversations of philosophy, research, and practice. the first visiting scholar was dr. david jardine, professor in the faculty of education at the university of calgary. in 2010, the institute was hosted in toronto with visiting scholar, dr. john d. caputo, professor of religion emeritus at syracuse university and the david r. cook professor of philosophy emeritus at villanova university. in 2011, dr. richard m. kearney, charles h. seelig chair of philosophy at boston college and visiting professor at university college dublin, was the visiting scholar for the institute held in calgary, alberta. dr. kearney initiated the idea for a journal that could showcase the work he heard from institute participants of bridging philosophy and practice. dr. caputo’s observation, that was mirrored by dr. kearney’s in the following year, was at first a surprise and then a gracious appreciation about how hermeneutics had “found its way” into practice disciplines such as nursing, education, social work, and psychology. they both expressed a profound awareness of the ways we were teaching hermeneutics, how students were taking up the ideas, and how we were using the philosophy of hermeneutics to guide research in our disciplines. dr. kearney suggested the idea of establishing a journal that would demonstrate how hermeneutics does not simply reside in philosophy but can be applied to living aspects of the world in such a way that human conditions and experiences can be understood differently and practice can be changed. as we launch the journal of applied hermeneutics, we proudly offer the first paper as an invited essay on diacritical hermeneutics by dr. richard kearney. in this paper, kearney expands on his project of diacritical hermeneutics that he introduced in strangers, gods and monsters (2003). this is a philosophical paper, and yet it quickly becomes clear that this is a philosophy of care, of urgent concern for questions of how we live in the world as beings of sense and flesh, and how we can search for justice and reconciliation in situations of fear and conflict. dr. kearney’s commitment to addressing these concerns is demonstrated by his involvement in drafting proposals for a northern ireland peace agreement in the 1990s, and more recently in the guestbook project, creating openings for dialogue across historical, cultural, and ideological divides (examples of this work can be found at: http: //www. bc.edu/schools/cas/guestbook). for those of us working in practice disciplines, seeking ways of better understanding what it is we do, and how to fulfill our obligations to those we meet in our work, the dialogue between philosophy and practice can be a powerful source of creative possibility. dr. kearney’s paper presents a valuable resource for our efforts to further the work of applying hermeneutics and stands as an inspiring opening to this new journal. we are delighted to offer this venue of shared and open publication of work that matters and makes a difference. in the complexity of our human lives and relationships, hermes is alive and well. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 vol. 1 4 authors nancy j. moules, rn, phd, professor, faculty of nursing, university of calgary, achf/achri nursing professorship in child and family centred cancer care, editor, journal of applied hermeneutics graham mccaffrey, rn, doctoral student, faculty of nursing, university of calgary, assistant editor and journal manager, journal of applied hermeneutics angela c. morck, rn, mn, doctoral student, faculty of nursing, university of calgary, assistant editor and journal manager, journal of applied hermeneutics david w. jardine, phd, professor, faculty of education, university of calgary acknowledgements a special thank you to dr. david w. jardine the ultimate teacher of hermeneutics who has shaped so many of our lives, scholarly endeavors, and thinking. thank you to assistant editors and journal managers: graham mccaffrey, rn, doctoral student, faculty of nursing and angela morck, rn, mn, doctoral student, faculty of nursing, university of calgary for actually making this online journal come to life and “work”. also thank you to judy powell, journals manager and project coordinator, and jeff liske, software developer, synergies project, libraries and cultural resources, university of calgary in their guidance about how to do this. references allen, d.g. (1995). hermeneutics: philosophical traditions and nursing practice research. nursing science quarterly, 8(4), 174-182. benner, p. (1985). quality of life: a phenomenological perspective on explanation, prediction and understanding in nursing science. advances in nursing science, 8(1), 1-14. benner, p. (1994). interpretive phenomenology: embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness. thousand oaks, ca: sage. chesla, c.a. (1995). hermeneutic phenomenology: an approach to understanding families. journal of family nursing, 1(1), 68-78. diekelmann, n., allen, d., & tanner, c. (1989). the national league for nursing criteria for appraisal of baccalaureate programs: a critical hermeneutic analysis (pub. no. 15-2253). new york, ny: national league for nursing press. gadamer, h-g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.) (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. greene, m. (1971). curriculum and consciousness. teachers college record, 73(2), 253-270. kearney, r. (2003). strangers, gods and monsters: interpreting otherness. new york, ny: routledge/taylor & francis group. moules, n.j. (2000). nursing on paper: the art and mystery of therapeutic letters in moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 vol. 1 5 clinical work with families experiences illness. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. pinar, w. (1975/2000). curriculum theorizing: the reconceptualists. reissued in 2000 as curriculum studies: the reconceptualists. troy, ny: educator’s international press. walsh, k. (1996). philosophical hermeneutics and the project of hans-georg gadamer: implications for nursing research. nursing inquiry, 3(4), 231-237. microsoft word klingle batman template.docx corresponding author: kirsten klingle, m.ed. email: kirsten.klingle@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics july 1, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 batman and the sticky-fingered maiden: psychology as an interpretive practice kirsten klingle abstract this paper is a short reflection on the nature of psychology as an interpretive practice by exploring the question: how, if at all, does interpretation apply to the field of psychology? this author presents the notion that interpretation is relational and that both client and therapist histories shape the individual’s ways of interpreting experience and prejudices that arise in therapeutic practice. keywords interpretation, psychology, hermeneutics if interpretation, as a concept, were a living breathing being, i think it would be female. i think she would be exceptionally quiet, often speaking in a whisper and wearing fuzzy white slippers so as to tread lightly and not give away her presence. i like to think she would have sticky fingers from venturing into many unknown and mysterious places and would be found exploring secluded nooks and camouflaged caves places of darkness that yearn to be exposed and lit from within. her very presence would be experienced by some as desirable, and by others as unwelcome given her tendency to ignite a chemical reaction. she would have a womb filled with preconceived notions, understandings, misunderstandings, personal histories, and internalized beliefs all bumping up against one another like a metal vessel filled with atoms. in the field of psychology, interpretation is an omnipresent force that psychologists and clients alike must appreciate and revere, as this sticky-fingered maiden is a lingering and necessary ingredient for human connection. klingle journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 5 2 interpretation: the significance of relationships interpretation, as i see it from a hermeneutic perspective, is closely bound up with how we understand and make sense of experience. we can only truly and deeply understand experience if we enter into the interpretation of it, and yet we can only interpret an experience if we have some understanding of it. this understanding need not always be in the form of personal experience, as understanding may come from hearing the experience of another. nevertheless, the relationship between interpretation and understanding is both iterative and symbiotic. to add to the complexity of this matter, interpretation also seems to be deeply embedded in relationships. as a counselling psychology student, i believe we (psychologists, also referred to throughout as therapists or practitioners) are constantly in a state of interpretive practice as we seek to understand not only our own experiences, but also the experiences of another, our clients. in this way, the focus is on interpretation as inextricably linked to and enrooted in interpersonal and intrapersonal relationships. we are in something, and that which we are in is relation to the self or another. in a similar vein, we humans, along with our experiences, do not exist in a vacuum. we are constantly being shaped by other inhabitants and the greater world around us, while at the same time shaping others. the practice of psychology, more specifically, can be thought of as a microcosm whereby this interaction between two beings has the power to shape and change both parties. for this change to take form, the psychological practice depends on the porosity of humans, that we can be touched, moved, and transformed by our own experiences and by bearing witness to the experiences of others. in so doing, we may enter into the experience of another yet we continue to remain grounded in our own bodies and within our own mind. in other words, psychologists can listen with openness yet we can never escape the fact that we hear and process all things interpretatively. interpretation in psychology turning briefly to the literature on psychotherapy, the term “interpretation” is also described as a technique used by the therapist in an effort to extend and deepen understanding. patterson (1974) had this to say about interpretation: clarification responses deal with what is explicitly and implicitly in the client’s behaviour, verbal and/or nonverbal. interpretations go beyond this, involving a contribution by the therapist. in interpretation, the therapist adds to what the client is saying, going beyond the client’s verbalizations and putting in something of his own. (p. 110) porter (1959) also attempted to elucidate this concept of interpretation in psychology. as he explained, therapists move beyond reflecting and towards interpretation when their motivation changes. as porter stated, the difference is not in what the therapist says. the difference is in the therapist’s purpose when he says it….when the therapist utters some words which are a construing of what the client or patient has expressed and it is the therapist’s purpose to be asking of the client or patient whether or not the construction put on the client’s expression was the klingle journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 5 3 meaning intendedthat’s a reflection. when the therapist utters some words which are a construing of what the client or patient has expressed and it is the therapist’s purpose to be informing the patient what meaning his expression holds regardless of his, the patient’s, intended meaningthat’s an interpretation. (p. 57) this distinction between reflexive and interpretive practice seems to highlight the notion that practitioners are deeply intertwined and invested in the therapeutic process their voices, experiences, and perspectives are of value in shaping the therapeutic alliance and the therapeutic journey. the therapist is not simply a parrot tasked with repeating key statements or offering rephrased summaries constructed by the client. nor is the therapist a detached and all-knowing being shrouded behind a screen as in the days of freud. instead, both client and therapist bring forth their experiences, past and present, along with their interpretations of these experiences. in so doing, the interaction is a prosperous one as both parties offer something to the other, and both potentially reap the rewards of such an encounter. histories: owning our suitcase what might the interpretive practice look like in the therapy room? could interpretive practice be as basic as offering the client a metaphor for their experience? i would argue yes, it can be that simple, but like most things in life it can also be far more complex. by offering our interpretation of what the client brings forth, there is the possibility to change, make anew, or shift ever so slightly the client’s way of seeing his or her own experience. yet the interpretive practice of psychology also allows for a rich bi-directional change, wherein the therapist too is transformed as a result of the interaction. this process is layered and somewhat convoluted. as the client interprets his or her experiences through a particular frame of reference (taking into account, either consciously or unconsciously, the historical, social, emotional, cognitive, and cultural contexts), therapists too enter into relationships with a particular frame of reference from which to understand and interpret their own and the clients’ experiences. we create and carry with us our histories, and return to these stories of the past often, perhaps without knowing. put another way, both therapist and client enter to the therapeutic interaction with a metaphorical suitcase full of past “stuff.” for some this stuff may include positive experiences, such as a healthy and happy childhood filled with memories of feeling loved and cared for. yet the suitcase may also be filled with negative stuff, such as past hurts and experiences of abuse. for most of us, the suitcase is filled with both types of experiences the good and the bad, the beautiful and the ugly. with this in mind, psychology, as an interpretive practice, is about recognizing the significance of our suitcase and how the contents of this suitcase shape and influence our interpretations. prejudices: batman for you, batman for me when thinking about how best to illustrate psychology as an interpretive practice, i am reminded of my work with one client, “miles,” a 36 year-old male. miles had a dream of becoming a stand-up comedian and worked hard at this pursuit, often devoting hours to perfecting his craft. klingle journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 5 4 however, he made little in the way of income and was forced to live at home with his parents as a result. early on in our work together, when asked about what he would like to get out of therapy, miles stated, “i want to become my own batman.” batman. bat man. a man who is a bat? a bat who is a man? there is so much in the word and there is so much in the meaning of the word that could be unpacked. dialoguing with a client allows me, the therapist, to do just that. i can not only check for clarification (e.g., asking “batman like the cartoon?”), but i can also deepen and enrich my understanding by asking questions that bring the topic to life such as “what does batman represent to you?”; “what does it mean to become your own batman?”; and “how will you know if and when you have become your own batman?” entangled in all of this, of course, are my own beliefs about and past experience with batman. for me, having been raised by a strong feminist mother, i was always told that i am no different from my male peers. as a result, at the age of seven when springtime approached and my mother needed to purchase new rubber boots for me she bought the boots that were on sale black, matte rubber boots with a batman symbol affixed to the front for all to see. i was mortified. i wanted sickly-sweet bubble gum pink boots with sparkles yet i was stuck with these black batman demon boots. batman, for me, will be forever tied to this experience of wanting to embrace the feminine yet being forced to look like a boy. according to my female peers at the time, batman was stupid and as a result of wearing these batman boots i, too, was stupid. i felt set apart from other girls, flawed, and disgusting. batman represented shame. so, when miles brought up this desire to become his own batman i interpreted it, perhaps without consciously knowing, from a place of past hurt. however, this is not what batman represented for miles, quite the opposite in fact, as i would come to learn in the later sessions. for miles, batman was a symbol of independence; he was a hero, a respected, valued, and contributing member of society. batman was also confident and acted selflessly for the good of others. these were all attributes that miles venerated and sought to embody. because of this experience with miles, i was forced to open up my suitcase, take a critical look, and dig around a little. as a result of our ongoing dialogue about becoming his own batman, miles would open up and unpack his own suitcase, in turn exploring the notion of what it means to be masculine and challenging what he believed to be the dominant discourse of hegemonic masculinity. as it relates to the interpretive practice of psychology, we both came to this therapeutic experience with our own “stuff” and yet we left through the same door, slightly changed, but headed in different directions. to suggest psychology is an interpretive practice is to explicitly bring to light the relevance of the ineradicable, ever-present sticky-fingered maiden. she is such a constant that we may very well forget her presence, similar to the way in which we tune out the nearby conversations in a café or habituate to the smell of coffee as it wafts through the room. while it may be true that she sometimes sit in the corner of the therapy room seemingly inconspicuous, at other times she will be positioned in front of, or in between, the client and therapist ensuring her presence is not overlooked. no matter our acknowledgment, she will persist always and in all ways. klingle journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 5 5 references patterson, c. h. (1974). relationship counseling and psychotherapy. new york, ny: harper & row. porter, e. h. (1959). critical incidents in psychotherapy. englewood cliffs, nj: prentice hall. microsoft word mouleseditorial.docx corresponding author: dr. nancy j. moules email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics july16, 2012 the author(s) 2012 editorial dr. david jardine and the “descartes lecture”: twenty years of miraculous returns nancy j moules in 1995, i was a master’s student in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary taking my first graduate nursing course in qualitative research. our professor, dr. marjorie mcintyre, informed us that she had invited a professor from the faculty of education for a guest lecture. she had become acquainted with dr. david jardine’s hermeneutic endeavor through a mutual teacher and outstanding scholar, dr. ted aoki. dr. mcintyre advised us in advance to “expect the unexpected” and that there was the potential of our worlds being shaken up over the three hours with dr. jardine. on the day he was to lecture, i arrived to class early to find a somewhat unconventional looking man in leather pants and bare feet, fiddling rather ineptly with the technical equipment in the room and i wondered if he was the media person who was setting up the equipment for class. once the rest of the class arrived, dr. mcintryre introduced this barefooted, long haired man as dr. jardine and turned the class over to him. for an hour and a half, we were transfixed, gently, yet almost audaciously and sometimes boldly invited into a philosophical and historical vortex that spun us around, indeed turning our taken-for-granted and assumed worlds and understandings upside down. dr. jardine began the class with the reading of the late bronwen wallace poem, “appeal,” taken from her collection of poetry, the stubborn particulars of grace” (1987). he started by taking us into the ordinary, everyday world we all recognized and then he took us back through history to show how we got to where we could recognize such a thing and recognize such a thing differently. after a tracing of this history and an understanding of how, in fact, the natural and human sciences bifurcated and ended up in a place of shadows, truth, imitation, and certainty, we took a coffee break and returned to room to bring our topics to the discussion. the topics that showed up in this discussion were issues of human concern hermeneutics applied to the moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 7 2 worlds of practice professions: nursing, social work, education, and psychology to name a few. dr. jardine gently cradled our topics and with the skill of a master interpreter helped us see what was beneath the obvious, what was addressing us, what we were not hearing in the “data,” and what the topic was asking of us. he ended the class with the final poem in wallace’s (1987, pp. 110-111) book, called “particulars,” the last stanza of which reads: and to say for myself, just once, without embarrassment, bless, thrown out as to some lightness that i actually believe in, surprised (as i believe they were) to find it here, where it seems impossible that one life even matters, though like them, i’ll argue the stubborn argument of the particular, right now, in the midst of things, this and this. i completed my phd in 2000 (with dr. janice bell as my supervisor), conducting a gadamerian hermeneutic study, and like my contemporaries, like those students before us, and the many students to come, i was exquisitely mentored by dr. jardine in hermeneutic understanding, tradition, and how to conduct “good” research which did not misappropriate or betray this tradition. in 2004, i began teaching the master’s level qualitative research course in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary, and in the same year, dr. dianne tapp and i developed a course in hermeneutic phenomenology (binding, moules, tapp, & rallison, 2007). in 2010, i began teaching the doctoral level qualitative research course. in all of these three courses and in every offering of them, i have invited dr. jardine to attend as a visiting lecturer, using the 3 hours to offer his “descartes lecture” as i have come to call it. this past winter, i asked permission to tape the lecture, had it transcribed, and suggested david submit it to the journal of applied hermeneutics as an invited submission. hundreds (if not thousands) of students across disciplines have heard this talk over time, some many times, as i have known of students who have taken david’s courses, and returned to audit them several times because of what they gain from them. with each offering of this lecture, the talk is somewhat different; something new emerges. i personally have heard it over two dozen times, and i am as transfixed every time, as much as i was the first time. this lecture is a legacy that i am proud to publish in our journal. what happens in the second part of the class after the lecture is what is more difficult to describe and why we chose not to transcribe that part of this recent class that we recorded. the students disperse at the coffee break, heads spinning, sometimes looking like deer in headlights. they return to class after the break, with their topics of research or study trying to take hold of something, trying to find traction. it is here that we see what wallace (1987, p. 13) wrote in appeals: as if they hoped to find that opening in each of us from which, long after we’d been told what happened next, they could begin their slower, more miraculous returns. the topics showed up: all the unsettling, upsetting, exuberant conversations about nurses working with children who die; domestic violence; the love of teaching children to learn to love math; the responsibilities and decision making of nurses who work triage in emergency departments; the inescapable human dramas of aging, dementia, love, death, suffering, and joys. as each topic found its moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 7 3 way into the conversation, hermeneutics joined it and, as is the case with all good hermeneutic work, hermeneutics itself disappears as the topic, and the topics themselves come to light through the delicate, rigorous, and courageous work of interpretation. this is work that makes sense only in the face-to-face encounter that cannot be captured on tape or in description; it is the real work of hermeneutics. it is the miraculous return of the topic, where there really is no “method” to it. it is the arrival of understanding that happens with an acute attentiveness to the topic, and a practiced art of strengthening. the openings the students and their topics sought were portals that hermeneutics and aletheia offer an enlivening and remembering of something that was forgotten, lost, or left. there is a buoyancy in this part of the class as we realize that all of this tradition and history and oppression is, in fact, joyous, enlightening, and offers something. this second half is different every time, but there is something present that echoes gadamer’s (1989) words: …in deciphering and interpreting...a miracle takes place: the transformation of something alien and dead into total contemporaneity and familiarity…that is why the capacity…to understand…is like a secret art, even a magic that frees and binds us. (pp. 163-164) like all good magic, some things cannot be explained, or should not be explained. dr. jardine came to the faculty of education at the university of calgary in a somewhat “roundabout” way. he completed his undergraduate degree in philosophy and religious studies in 1973 at mcmaster university in hamilton. his ma supervisor was g.b. madison, who brought hans-georg gadamer to mcmaster while david was studying there. professor madison had paul ricouer as his supervisor in paris. david’s phd supervisor, dr. dieter misgeld, had studied under first gadamer and then habermas. dr. jardine started at the university of calgary in 1986. professor jardine has published 83 refereed journal articles, 35 book chapters, and 8 books on ecological, philosophical, hermeneutic, and buddhist studies of various facets of educational theory and practice. i have no doubt that dr. david jardine will, in time (in his lifetime, i hope) be renowned as one of the most astute and profound hermeneutic scholars and prolific writers of the past three decades. for now, i am content to proudly call david my teacher, my mentor, my colleague, and my friend. references binding, l., moules, n.j., tapp, d.m., & rallison, l. (2007). hermeneutic musings on learning: the dialogical nature of teaching interpretively. journal of educational thought, 41(2), 179-189. gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.) (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. wallace, b. (1987). appeal. in the stubborn particulars of grace (pp. 11-13). toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. wallace, b. (1987). particulars. in the stubborn particulars of grace (pp. 110-111). toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. microsoft word strong corrected proof.docx corresponding author: dr. tom strong email: strongt@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics april 13, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 twins philosophically separated at birth? a review of groundless ground: a study of wittgenstein and heidegger tom strong review groundless ground: a study of wittgenstein and heidegger lee braver cambridge, ma: mit books, 2014 isbn-13: 978-0262526043 370 pages keywords heidegger, wittgenstein, postfoundationalism, review groundless grounds is all we have ever had, which proves their adequacy. lee braver, 2014, p. 215 the modern scientific project aimed to get things right using proper names that could be mapped on to foundational knowledge, yielding what hillary putnam (1981) critiqued as an unattainable “god’s eye view” of reality. both born in 1889, both initially seduced by a philosophical dream of articulating foundational reality, and each to become one of the 20th century’s most influential philosophers, ludwig wittgenstein and martin heidegger are typically regarded as having very different philosophical projects, though each attacked science’s purported “ground.” wittgenstein, protégé of bertrand russell, took logical positivism to what many saw as its analytical apex, only to later quite publicly abandon this approach for a view of meaning grounded in “language games.” heidegger, protégé of edmund husserl who had been aiming to make a strong journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 6 2 science of subjectivity with his phenomenology, reformulated subjectivity as “being,” invoking temporal, contextual, relational engagements and performances. in their respective intellectual journeys, both wittgenstein and heidegger took head on the notion that science and philosophy could correctly name and map the foundations of reality. my personal interest in braver’s (2014) groundless grounds relates to how interpretive ideas can be adapted to frontline helping practices. i have grown increasingly concerned about how philosophy of science arguments keep being used to suppress an interpretive and relational approach to practice (e.g., strong & busch, 2013). modern “r”ealist science is alive and well, promising practitioners and the public that human problems can be correctly named and mapped on to foundational knowledge from which prescriptive solutions are warranted. underpinning scientific arguments of this kind is a view that objective (i.e., untainted by human meaning and contact, see daston & galison, 2007), knowledge is obtainable and should trump any forms of knowing developed through human interaction. this particular philosophy of science is antithetical to any notion that interpretive, relational work could be ethical, valid, or helpful. without strong counter-arguments to bolster an interpretive and relational approach to helping, such notions of helpfulness can seem easily discreditable in these days of evidence-based practice. needed by the modern science approach, it seems, are “how-to” scripts and foundational knowledge to guide one’s helping; less important are the pragmatic immediacies of humans relating and understanding. my understanding of the postmodern and social constructionist upheavals in late 20th century human science and service work was that different, relational grounds were becoming accessible to family and narrative therapists like myself. however, in the early stages of self-identifying in this way, i felt inadequately grounded in interpretive ideas that could shore up a compatible philosophy of science that supported this approach to practice, and so i read (lock & strong, 2010). my reading inevitably brought me to wittgenstein and heidegger as key thinkers whose ideas had applicability to my preferred ways of practice. lee braver’s groundless grounds is an ambitious and groundbreaking volume for making rigorous comparisons of two intellectual giants seldom juxtaposed. this would not be a good introductory book to the thinking of either wittgenstein or heidegger (see monk, 1990 or richardson 2012, for their respective biographies), and is targeted more for those who have been rewarded by reading wittgenstein’s (1953) philosophical investigations or heidegger’s (1962) being and time. as any reader of their books can tell you, the challenging prose of each book is compounded by the counter-intuitiveness of their revolutionary ideas. many readers are unaware of how steeped they are in the foundational grounding of modern science, that reading either (later) wittgenstein or heidegger can initially leave them feeling their intelligence is being insulted, until unrecognized, bedrock assumptions, get dislodged with vertigo-inducing consequences. it is the comprehensiveness and brilliance with which both wittgenstein and heidegger took on their respective philosophical projects that makes them the 20th century’s most influential philosophers. braver’s project, which in my estimation succeeds well, is to bridge what each thinker was doing, finding parallels in wittgenstein and heidegger where former scholars saw distinct, possibly incommensurable, ideas and approaches. braver helps readers move through some of the most obvious parallels accessibly and informatively. while wittgenstein launched his philosophizing down the foundational path with his analytic philosophy classic, tractatus logico-philosophicus, he abandoned this direction bestrong journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 6 3 cause of its idealizations, and lack of hubris (philosophers cannot articulate a foundational urlanguage of science). like heidegger (though there is only one cited instance of wittgenstein mentioning him at a meeting of the vienna circle), both turned to how people did everyday life using means and terms that were real for them. each philosopher adopted an anthropological stance, focusing on in many cases what polanyi (1967) would refer to as the “tacit dimension” of everyday life. in particular each was interested in how life was performed meaningfully (i.e., for the people so engaged) in taken for granted interactions. this interest is a striking departure from the atomistic views of prior thinkers, that discrete essences of meaning could be severed from the activities in which they find their immediate relevance and significance, and studied as foundational knowledge of material reality. both wittgenstein and heidegger took up linguistic views of meaning based on how words were used, as moves in “language games” (wittgenstein) or as “equipment” in teleological activities (heidegger). most important, however, for braver, is their antifoundationalism. it was this turn away from discoverable foundations which has drawn the greatest heat from critics. charges of relativism and nihilistic semanticism have been the usual first line of attack on those taking up the ideas of wittgenstein and heidegger. it is, however, precisely here that a new kind of grounding – a socio-cultural grounding – is central to the arguments of both thinkers. the grounds are participatory, relational interactions that, over time, acquire the force of habit, customs to which we hold ourselves and each other. this extends to the language we communicate in our interactions, situated evaluations of what is proper or good, and the (“foundationshaking”) disruptions caused when our interactions defy custom and expectation. the human world both wittgenstein and heidegger were pointing to cannot be atomized, its meanings and customs obtain through agreement and trusting perpetuation. there is a difference being inside and engaged with this human world than there could ever be if one took seriously the abstract, “objectively detached,” claims of the modern foundationalists, as braver (2014) underscores: this groundlessness would make thought viciously circular were we trying to enter it from the outside – if, that is, starting from the epistemological veil of ignorance, we were to try justifying the principle of seeking reasons. fortunately, being has “graced” us by “throwing” us into this circle in the first place…thrownness is a gift that enables, not an existential burden that compromises. (p. 202) braver is a clear and gifted writer, well up to the task of communicating the overlaps and complements he invites readers to find in the thinking of wittgenstein and heidegger, who, in his colourful prose, “dig up descartes to kill him off” (p. 8) or were “weaning us off the hunger for explanations” (p. 152). he is not without mild criticism for either writer, seeing in heidegger, for example, an obsession with phenomenological writing about “being” (braver: “even a committed heideggerian like myself must concede that his chronic invocations of being can approach selfparody, a kind of ontological tourette’s syndrome”, 2014, p. 130). wittgenstein imports an animalistic nature to account for human finitude, habitual interacting, and the animating impetus for such interacting (braver again: “wittgenstein wants to help us face the knotted squalor of the real, to force our heavenward gaze down to the detritus of practice”, p. 226). what braver does best is set up previously unconsidered juxtapositions, like this one on wittgenstein’s private language argument: “as wittgenstein’s ‘private’linguists can only introspect with public tools, so for heidegger ‘knowing oneself is grounded in being with’” (p. 165). strong journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 6 4 of course, there are differences between these two philosophical giants which are downplayed in braver’s book for the intended similarities and complementarities. wittgenstein grounds his view of meaning in language games, and apart from referring to these as habit-like, disregards the kind of historicism and “care” one finds in heidegger. later heidegger grew increasingly mystical and focused on poetic excellence, while wittgenstein turned his attention more fully on errors he saw in the philosophy of science. what braver has done is tapped obvious and not so obvious sources for key insights into where both men shared revolutionary projects of unsettling the much idealized ground of modern science. “groundless grounds” does not refer to an oxymoron; it speaks to the historical and cultural arbitrariness and seeming durability of a relational ontology that interpretive and other scholars are still coming to terms with. references braver, l. (2014). groundless ground: a study of wittgenstein and heidegger. cambridge, ma: mit press. daston, l., & galison, p. (2007). objectivity. new york, ny: zone books. heidegger, m. (1962). being and time (j. macquarrie & e. robinson, trans.). toronto, on, canada: harper collins. (original published in german in 1927). lock, a. j., & strong, t. (2010). social constructionism: sources and stirrings in theory and practice. new york, ny: cambridge university press. monk, r. (1990). ludwig wittgenstein: the duty of genius. new york, ny: penguin. polanyi, m. (1967). the tacit dimension. new york, ny: doubleday anchor. putnam, h. (1981). reason, truth, and history. new york, ny: cambridge university press. richardson, j. (2012). heidegger. new york, ny: routledge. strong, t., & busch, r. (2013). dsm-5 and evidence-based family therapy? australian and new zealand journal of family therapy, 34(2), 90-103. wittgenstein, l. (1953). philosophical investigations (g. e. m. anscombe, trans.). oxford, uk: blackwell. wittgenstein, l. (1961). tractatus logico-philosophicus (d. f. pears & b. f. mcguinness, trans.; introduction, b. russell). london, uk: routledge & kegan paul (originally published in german in 1921) microsoft word jardine.docx corresponding author: dr. david w. jardine email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics august 19, 2013 the author(s) 2013 guest editorial: morning thoughts on application david w. jardine the text . . .if it is to be understood properly i.e., according to the claim it makes-must be understood at every moment, in every concrete situation, in a new and different way. understanding here is always application. hans-georg gadamer (1989, p. 309) truth and method below is an amazing passage in light of gadamer’s thoughts on application and how interpretation makes little sense “in general.” its character only starts to appear once it is applied to a topic, a case, a locale, an instance. only in the face of the specific resistances and demands that the case brings, is interpretation able to “work.” the individual case is thus “fecund,” not only in the sense that its new arrival demands that what has been previously established open itself up to the arriving sense of potency and possibility and demand that the new case brings (thus demonstrating the deep and unavoidable impermanence of such establishments). it is also fecund in the sense that facing and working through such moments of arrival, again and again, is how getting “good” at interpretation happens it is fecund in relation to my ability to work interpretively. that is why it is always i, myself, who must take this venture. it is also why understanding a hermeneutic study requires precisely such a venture from readers. interpretation is, in this sense, an ongoing practice that takes practice to become practiced in. one’s “general” ability in this regard is the product of something specific being repeatedly practiced, and, therefore, it never becomes simply a method that can be handed over to someone unpracticed. it is always a practice whose practice can, and must be, cultivated in order to be understood. “understanding here is always application,” and this includes understanding a hermeneutic study and understanding how to “do” hermeneutic work. hermeneutic work is thus always both about application and cultivated at the locales of application. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 9 2 so, now, the amazing passage that parallels this hermeneutic arc. it is from volume two of tsong-kha-pa’s (2004), the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment, originally composed in 1406 ce: it is an extremely important point. if you train in these attitudes of impartiality, love and compassion without distinguishing and taking up specific objects of meditation, but only using a general object from the outset, you will just seem to generate these attitudes. then, when you try to apply them to specific individuals, you will not be able to actually generate these attitudes toward anyone. but once you have a transformative experience towards an individual in your meditations practice . . .you may then gradually increase the number of individuals you visualize within your meditation. (tsong-kha-pa, 2004, p. 35). this passage highlights why, earlier in this text, tsong-kha-pa stated that we must avoid falling into the “problems of peace” (p. 24). our professions teaching, nursing, counseling, working with troubled students in schools, or any other locale of interpretive venture in the face of some face in the world do not lead us to seek our own peace separate from the suffering of the world, but seek, rather, to “take on a life of suffering . . . in order to help all living beings” (p. 29). this is a life, shall we say, of enduring and undergoing, of venture, hidden as these images are in gadamer’s use of the term erfahrung for the sort of “experience” from which we might learn (with its etymological root fahren, to journey, venture, and its other derivative, vorfahren, those who have ventured “before” [vor-], i.e., ancestors). this is why gadamer (1989, p. 356) cited in this regard an idea central to his hermeneutics that is inherited from the greek tragedies of aeschylus (c. 525 bce): pathei mathos, “learning through suffering.” hermeneutically understood, our professions are not seeking theories or explanations or models or interventions that promise to pacify or cure the life-world and its woes. we know precisely how often such promises have not only come to grief but unwittingly caused suffering. we know, too, from alice miller’s (1989) work, how education in particular was once, and in many ways, still is, quite witting about such matters of inflicting suffering, as miller’s title announces, “for your own good.” still and all, and despite the understandable hesitancy that must surround our work, that work requires that we “remain in the realm in which beings dwell” (tsong-kha-pa, 2004, p. 30). we turn toward suffering, again and again. this is akin to hermeneutics persistently turning towards the lifeworld and not away from it to some edenic world of essences cast in peaceful, finalized composure; this is how hermeneutics takes on part of the phenomenological lineages of a return to lived-experience whilst jettisoning edmund husserl’s frightened desire to quell that life with the eidetic reduction. hermeneutics interprets, not in order to thematize, essentialize, or placate, but in order to let our troubles be what they are, thus ameliorating our fraught “if onlys” and therefore making clear-sightedness and welljudged action possible. letting it be what it is involves, in some sense, freeing ourselves from our attachment to it: “to rise above the pressure of what impinges on us from the world means to keep oneself so free from what one encounters of the world that one can present it to oneself as it is” (gadamer, 1989, p. 444). tsong-kha-pa does say, earlier in the text, that “those who have developed jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 9 3 the . . .spirit of enlightenment and [thus] aspire [to it], although they lack its application, still ‘shine’” (2004, p. 16). i think, with student teachers for example, who sometimes desperately ask where to begin, of how taking on the spirit of interpretability is the key (tsong-kha-pa calls this “aspiration”). it means, simply put, proceeding in light of an understanding of the interpretability of the world, seeking those dependent co-arisings that surround things, and resisting the logic of substance (gadamer, 1989, p. 242) and the temptations of reification (tsong-kha-pa, 2002, p. 120), both of which aim to suppress the uprisings of the world and seek false permanencies in this, the deeply human land of shadow. even if you have not often practiced the application of such a spirit and have not therefore, built up the composures of practice, still, it is in this spirit that one proceeds in the repeated practice of application. again, however, the repeated practice of application is essential: “if you have only an intellectual understanding of this spirit, then you likewise have only an intellectually understanding of what it means to be a . . .practitioner” (p. 17). it is always this child’s life, that parent’s woes, this client’s nightmare, that patient’s desire to let go in the face of impending death, that is key. interpretation always requires doing the work again in the face of the task we face. it is good to hear that: the more you practice these things, the more accustomed your mind will become to them, and the easier it will be to practice what you had initially found difficult to learn. (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 185-186) however, our proper relation to such matters must always and everywhere be rewon, here, and here. this is where is borne the deep hesitancy that is part of hermeneutic work (see jardine, in press), and about such hesitancy, both hermeneutics and buddhism are steadfast. our composure must always be re-gained, re-dedicated to the work at hand. our becoming experienced practitioners always involves venturing out all over again always having to suffer once again the exigencies of existence and their lessons and, as i have found in my own work, that there the fellowship (sangha) of such work is a great comfort. it is in this common fortitude or strength that the strength of hermeneutics lays, even though part of its demand is that i myself and no one else must take on this dedication and no one can take it on in my stead. it is with no irony at all, however, that tsong-kha-pa (2004, p. 182-207, emphasis added) names this “joyous perseverance.” it is thus that pathei mathos can shed something of its dour countenance. very early morning, bragg creek ab, july 16, 2013 biography david w. jardine, phd is a professor in the faculty of education at the university of calgary. references gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method. (j. weinsheimer, trans.). new york, ny: continuum books. jardine, d. (in press). “you’re very clever young man”: on the truth of suffering that lies at the heart of a hermeneutic pedagogy. in d. jardine, g. mccaffrey, & c. gilham (in press). on the pedagogy of suffering: jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 9 4 hermeneutic and buddhist meditations. new york, ny: peter lang. miller, a. (1989). for your own good: hidden cruelty in child-rearing and the roots of violence. toronto, on, canada: collins. tsong-kha-pa (2002). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume three. ithaca ny: snow lion. tsong-kha-pa (2004). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume two. ithaca ny: snow lion. microsoft word estefan review.docx corresponding author: andrew estefan, rpn phd email: aestefan@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics june 29, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 book review: “opus hermeneuticae.” the work of hermeneutics: a review of moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang andrew estefan the journal of applied hermeneutics serves as a gathering place for scholars from many disciplines to come together and think about how hermeneutics contributes to the exploration and development of disciplinary knowledge. this journal is part of a conversation that, to draw upon gadamer’s (1960/2006) ideas, has a “spirit of its own” (p.385). gadamer believed conversation had emergent properties, bringing into existence something that might not have been foreseen. i have taken great interest in the ways the conversation in this journal is unfolding. conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice is a timely and articulate contribution to this hermeneutic scholarship. read as a whole, the book is a thoughtful accounting of how one might imagine and enact hermeneutic research. the authors’ careful treatment of key philosophical work lends considerable credibility to their accounts of how hermeneutic research can be done. the book contains many examples, closely tied to philosophical and methodological concerns. conducting hermeneutic research is set out in ten chapters, with a foreword by american philosopher and continental philosophy expert, dr. john caputo. in his foreword, dr. caputo calls upon readers to engage with the book in a way that fits a broad hermeneutic agenda. we are being asked to “see the unseeable.” that which is unseeable is precisely so not because it is transcendental, but because of its immediacy. the work of hermeneutics involves doing. interpretation is active, alive, and engaged. moules and her colleagues ask us to see this, and they show us a way. estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 review 1 2 in their opening chapter, “coming to hermeneutics” the authors preface their work with acknowledgement of how being and knowing extends from the past into the present and, in turn, to imagined futures. their words remind me of how dewey’s (1938/1997) theory of experience links experience to history and remembering, and how this invites us into acts of imagination and wonder about possibilities and that which is to come. to engage with the world in this way calls forth humility and ethical obligations. against a background of rich traditions and histories, interpretations are moments in which we are able to think, see, and experience differently but never from a position of certainty or solidity. conducting research that builds upon history, tradition, and experience requires of us an effort to engage with the world in ways that open us to interpretations and also allow us to think and move around them. this book explores some murky territory for hermeneutics, that is, the possibility of a method for the conduct of hermeneutic research. to do this, the authors have very clearly moved from an engaging and illuminating account of the philosophical foundations of hermeneutic phenomenology through to examples of how hermeneutics is being enacted in the world. in their opening chapter, the authors clearly set the scene for tensions that arise between philosophy, topic, and method, and they return to show these tensions throughout the text as they describe and explain their research and practice. chapter 2 engages with the voices that have shaped the hermeneutic research landscape. of particular note for me is the careful attention to the confluences and departures in thinking between key figures who have influenced contemporary hermeneutic research. the ideas in this chapter, indeed throughout the book, are accessible to students and more seasoned academics alike. the historical tracing in this chapter helpfully clarifies what hermeneutics brings to understanding in a field of practice. chapter 3 is devoted to the work of gadamer. through a focus on his work, the authors weave a complex argument for the place of hermeneutics in human understanding and in inquiry in practice disciplines. chapter 4 extends the thinking in the previous chapter, by way of a “for and against” method. learners, as well as those engaged in hermeneutic work, will find a home in this chapter. the discussion here is suffused with the tensions of bringing together reticence about “method” with the necessary conditions for enacting the “doing.” the authors clearly evoke the troubles of subscribing to method scripts that privilege one type of knowing over another. by invoking dostal and gadamer, the authors shift our thinking from method in its conventional or prescriptive sense to recognition that method is a discipline of attending to “things.” this is an important shift in this chapter because it heralds for us a turn towards a different conception of what it might mean to be methodical. at the same time, the writing refocuses us to attend to things; in other words, giving primacy to the topic that hermeneutics sets out to engage, and in which it also lives. with attending to the topic as a central endeavor the authors carefully choose the term guidelines to escape the traps of the “methodological imperative” and to “steady the motion” of inquiry. the five guidelines in this chapter are extremely helpful. they read as principles rather than instructions that researchers can think with as they explore, inquire, and engage interpretively. chapter 5 invites readers to consider the address of the topic and in doing so, calls attention to an important premise of hermeneutic work: that hermeneutic inquiry begins in a world already estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 review 1 3 saturated. as we live and practice in this saturated world, sometimes we are given reason to pause, or we encounter a sudden change in direction that draws attention to something that we were previously unaware. in this book, the address is emphasized as a catalytic moment: it is the moment when understanding begins, it is a sensitization to the possibility of a topic for inquiry. address hones the mind and senses to notice as the unfolding topic weaves in and out of shadows. chapter 6 provides helpful advice and techniques for conducting interviews in hermeneutic research. the idea of crossing boundaries is invoked to explain that research conversations do indeed step over the boundaries of ordinary social conversation. the point is made that effective research interviews are skillfully enacted and purposeful. moules and her colleagues suggest some strategies for effective interviewing in hermeneutic research without lapsing into trying to define the “hermeneutic interview” and they are wise in their avoidance of making grand claims in this regard. in their care-full discussion, the authors go on to clarify an important point: that effective conversational interviewing in research is not the same as gadamer’s notion of the genuine conversation. the tensions between these conceptions of conversation are well played out in the text, and this is a particularly useful discussion for those who are new to hermeneutics as well as those seeking clear direction about how undertake a qualitative research interview. in chapter 7, data analysis is positioned as synonymous with interpretation. in order to analyze in a hermeneutic study, researchers must engage with data interpretively and this chapter grounds the reader in the theoretical and practical dimensions of interpretive practice. important questions about analysis are addressed in this chapter. for example: how far can one go with an interpretation before it extends beyond a defensible origin in data? why should a hermeneutic researcher be prepared to extend interpretations into broader social and theoretical landscapes? when do some techniques (like using metaphor and etymology) become limiting in their capacity to extend the interpretive endeavor? these are important questions for hermeneutic researchers to entertain and resolve in the process of designing their studies and inquiring into particular topics and phenomena. chapter 8 argues for interpretive writing as that which connects analysis to interpretation and as the medium through which hermeneutics can reveal itself. this chapter is very much a “show” rather than “tell.” the chapter draws heavily upon the doctoral research of two of the authors (mccaffrey & laing) to show possibilities for, and styles of, interpretive writing. both examples are strong and herein lies a risk for this text: that the exemplars offered could seem out of reach for some, because both mccaffrey and laing are accomplished interpretive writers. this risk is minimized in the glimpses the authors have provided into their thinking as they wrote and subsequently engaged with their interpretations. for me, this chapter calls forth a wondering about the experiences and phenomena that shape my own research inquiries. as i wonder, i recognize my entry into these curiosities and puzzles is different to how mccaffrey and laing approached theirs. as i result, i do not feel alienated from the text; instead i am prompted to imagine a different form of interpretive expression. thinking with the material in this chapter has been instructive and also freeing. the examples in this book are best read as invitations, not prescriptions, and, as with the preceding chapters, they open thinking space for interpretive practice rather than close it down. estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 review 1 4 the increasing uptake of qualitative research methods means that criteria for rigor in qualitative research continue to be explored and debated. in the context of postmodern sensibilities, it is no longer possible to retain confidence in a “one size fits all” approach to determining good qualitative work. the diversity of theoretical underpinnings, methods, and intents mean that panmethodological approaches to rigor will simply no longer do. chapter 9 titled, “the rigor and integrity of hermeneutic research” assertively dispels the notion that generalized criteria can be applied to hermeneutic research. the authors quote marguerite sandelowski (1993, p.2), who argues rigorous research as being that which maintains a “fidelity to the spirit…of the work.” if this is indeed what forms the foundation of rigor, the spirit of the work must be captured in criteria that pertain to the method. chapter 9 sets out considerations and criteria for rigorous hermeneutic research. these criteria make sense in the context of the theoretical and practical concerns already made explicit in the book. the coherence here is striking, and although some familiar terms of qualitative rigor appear in the chapter they are being moved in interesting ways that will provoke further conversations among scholars in hermeneutics as well as other qualitative approaches. in their final chapter, the authors address the “so what” questions associated with hermeneutic research. this chapter concludes in a way that reveals a further way this book might work in the world. in the apology, socrates explained his duty of being a cross-examiner of “the pretenders to wisdom.” moules and her colleagues cross-examine influential ideas about hermeneutic work and, in doing so, they open up something new, in light of what has gone before, exposing, revealing and concealing in an intelligent and elegant way. this is what happens when immersed in a world made knowable by hermeneutics. to conclude, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice will be an influential new voice in the research methodology literature. this book is a product, in part, of concerns about method for hermeneutic research. dewey (1938/1997) emphasized how living things, such as people, attempt to turn the energies that act upon them into “means of [our] own further existence” (p.1). hermeneutics not only acts upon us, it is within us. hermeneutics is energetic, it is pervasive, and sometimes hard to capture as it hides amid the experiences of the world. moules and her colleagues go a long way towards harnessing hermeneutics in a way that leaves it free and unencumbered, but that makes possible a vision of how it might sustain us in research work. this book is an opus hermenuticae; it is the work of hermeneutics, and, it works. references dewey, j. (1938/1997). democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. new york, ny: free press. gadamer, h.g. (1960/2006). truth and method (3rd ed, j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans). london, uk: continuum. sandelowski, m. (1993). rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. advances in nursing science,16(2), 1-8. microsoft word moulesmccaffrey2015.docx 1 university of calgary, faculty of nursing corresponding author: nancy j. moules, rn phd email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 11, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 editorial: catching hermeneutics in the act nancy j. moules1 & graham mccaffrey1 as 2014 came to a close, we sent to publication with peter lang publishers a book manuscript entitled “conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice” (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, in press). as we await publication, we have been reflecting on the very intense, important, and exceedingly difficult work of writing this particular book. we had the privilege of dr. john d. caputo writing a foreword to the book and he offered this remarkable comment saying that the book… catches hermeneutics in the act. it brings home in the most vivid way just what hermeneutics really is – in the concrete. its authors are concretely engaged and hermeneutically enlightened practitioners who are describing the difficult and delicate conditions under which concrete hermeneutical work takes place. (caputo, in moules et al., in press) these are humbling words that could not more clearly elucidate the difficulties that writing the book held – it was difficult and delicate work and, at times, it was wordless work, a challenge when you are trying to write a book! catching something is tricky business and especially tricky if what you are after is the exact opposite. we did not want to catch and entrap hermeneutics as a research “method” – we wanted to catch it “in the act” of the world – in the ways it allows things to act and exposes the action that is often just “lost to the work of simply getting by” (wallace, 1987, p. 12). caputo’s words go to the heart of the enterprise of applied hermeneutics and are an encouraging reminder of the newness and excitement of what that represents. caputo, as well as dr. richard kearney and dr. nicholas davey, have come to the annual canadian hermeneutic institute to share their expertise as hermeneutic philosophers, steeped in a long and profound tradition. in each case, they have told us that they approached the invitation with curiosity as to what scholars and practitioners in practice professions both wanted to hear from them, and what we could have to add to that tradition. each time, they have shared their knowledge, ideas, and thinking with moules & mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 1 2 exceptional generosity and they have “got it” – they have quickly seen that the interpretation of human encounters in the context of practice professions is as much a fit object for hermeneutic study as an artwork, a poem, or a religious text. having a glimpse of applied hermeneutics through the eyes of philosophical experts is at the same time gratifying and a stimulating reminder that we are working fresh ground, and it behooves us to keep working to be as exacting as we can about what we do. it is in this spirit that it felt timely to undertake to describe the work-in-progress that is applied hermeneutics in the fleshed-out form of a book. we proposed the book because we believed that something had to be articulated about how hermeneutics, particularly gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics (1960/1989), had something to say to practice professions about a way to approach research around human concerns. four academics (three nurses and one educator) endeavored then to find language that was “concrete” enough to be understood but did not fall into the trap of offering a prescribed method of conducting hermeneutic research. in chapter four of the book, we took up this issue of method as, rather than a set prescription, it is instead an act of being methodical and following leads. in his foreword, caputo reminds us of the etymological meaning of method: meta as making one’s way along a particular path (odos). gadamer (2007) suggested that “understanding is an adventure, and like any other adventure, is dangerous” (p. 243), but, in this book, we tried to suggest that understanding is the ultimate hermeneutic wager: that understanding matters and will make a difference in matters of human consequence of living well in conditions where suffering often exists. we tried to offer a prompt to conduct research that touches on human conditions of living: illness, schools, children, health, relationships, suffering, healing, and hope. this was hard work. balancing a description of how to conduct something without offering a map, guide, baton, or train engine conductor cap is challenging. in many ways, the work of hermeneutics as a research approach is somewhat intuitive, but we also believe it is something that can be taught, learned, and definitely practiced. writing the chapter about conducting interviews was an act of trying to capture the complexity, contingency, and fluidity of the interview. it is deeply responsive as is hermeneutics. there is no guide for an interview, no prior questions determined that will protect one from what is going to come in the interview. it is like describing art – here is how it appears right here and now, but if you turn to look at it from another angle or through another eye, its meaning changes. conducting an interview in a responsive mode requires tact, discretion, discernment, and skill. it requires a turn of head and turn of eye and ear. it is not easy to do and even harder to describe or teach. the chapter on analysis stopped us in our tracks. we know what we do when we are into the deep work of interpretation and we so often talk with students about how to begin this deep and involved work. interpretation is skilled, complex, and exciting work. to find language, though, to describe this practice was very difficult. we needed language that was at once concrete and yet complex. hermeneutic analysis (i.e., interpretation) is not easy; we could not sell it off as such, however we had to present it as something that is “doable” and something that can be learned and practiced. data analysis, like so much in hermeneutics, is most purely caught on the wing, in the intense back and forth of making sense of particular human situations. beneath the dry research terminology of data, are the stories, memories, thoughts, and feelings of people often recalling momoules & mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 1 3 ments of extremity in their lives. we bear a responsibility to hold those data and make good use of them, transforming them without traducing them, in our interpretations. that is the ethical heart of hermeneutic work. approaching the chapter on rigor and integrity of hermeneutic research felt like a revisiting of every proposal we have ever written, every presentation to scientists, or die-hard quantitative researchers, and a recalling of trying to defend something without being defensive (see for e.g., moules, jardine, mccaffrey, & brown, 2013). writing it, finding the words though, despite the difficulty, proved to be particularly affirming. we were not simply arguing for the rigor but really seeing it and, for once, actually believing in it with a conviction we had been shy about before. the same happened in the “so what” chapter – the understandable demand that the work matters and addresses what is at stake. what surprised us was the discovery that what is really at stake in this work is that it compels us to live in the world differently: the knowledge of knowledge compels. it compels us to adopt an attitude of permanent vigilance against the temptation of certainty. it compels us to recognize that certainty is not a proof of truth. it compels us to realize that the world everyone sees is not the world but a world we bring forth with others. it compels us to see that the world will be different only if we live differently. it compels us because, when we know that we know, we cannot deny (to ourselves or to others) that we know…(this) implies an ethics that we cannot evade…an ethics that springs from human reflection and puts human reflection right at the core as a constitutive social phenomenon. (maturana & varela, 1992, p. 245) the “so what” of hermeneutic research is inherently a social endeavor. though questions that guide hermeneutic research are vitally important, no less important is to answer these questions tentatively, openly, and with the hermeneutic humility that recognizes that no one question can be answered definitively once and for all. rather, hermeneutics “concentrates on the question of what happens to us when we ‘understand’” (davey, 2006, p. xi). hermeneutics compels us as researchers and users of research to live in the world differently, to realize that understanding is not, as davey (2006) invoked, just about interpreting the world but also about changing it. (moules et al., in press) hermeneutic questions are hard questions; hermeneutic understanding is hard understanding. yet, at the heart of it is the capacity to know and live differentlyto find language that works. we believe this book will make a contribution to our practices but we also believe it made a difference to our thinking and what is yet to come. applied hermeneutics, hermeneutics as a way of conducting research, is in one sense well established – there are many published studies, there are variant approaches in the literature (to which this book makes a substantial contribution), but set against the centuries-old traditions of interpretation of religious texts, or the philosophical development of hermeneutics it is still a new adventure. each publication in a practice discipline that stakes a claim as hermeneutic is still perceptibly defining the field. there is a degree of exposure in this – we have encountered scholars in the humanities who look askance at our travails in the world of hermeneutics, just as we are familiar with the objections of those who fetishize the scientific method in our own disciplines. it is only a hermeneutic truism, however, to say that there is more to learn, more to be done, and that even as we have tried to articulate how far we have come, the way ahead lies open. moules & mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 1 4 in this book, we strived to conserve the human conditions and sensitivities of our topics and, according to caputo, we offered “what the philosophers call the ‘hermeneutic situation’ in the concrete, glowing white hot and jumping off the pages of the philosophy books” (caputo, in moules et al., in press). references caputo, j.d. (in press). foreword: the wisdom on hermeneutics. in n.j. moules, g. mccaffrey, j.c. field, & c.m. laing, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. new york, ny: suny. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev.ed., j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.) new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (2007). the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (r. palmer, ed. & trans). evanston, il: northwestern university press. maturana, h.r., & varela, f. (1992). the tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding (rev. ed.). boston, ma: shambhala. moules, n.j., jardine, d.w., mccaffrey, g., & brown, c.b. (2013). “isn’t all oncology hermeneutic?”. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 3. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5w95141 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (in press). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. wallace, b. (1987). appeal. in the stubborn particulars of grace. toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. microsoft word jardine 2015 corrected proof.docx corresponding author: david w. jardine email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics april 23, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 a failed attempt to finish a thought left in mid-air by christopher hitchens david w jardine abstract this paper is a short reflection on the nature of hermeneutics and the strange joy and burden of writing. it focuses on a particular form of hesitancy, telling, and re-telling found in a short video clip featuring christopher hitchens. keywords hermeneutics, writing, christopher hitchens banish all dismay extinguish every sorrow if i'm lost or i'm forgiven the birds will still be singing. from elvis costello (1993), “the birds will still be singing” it is an odd thing when something you read or hear actually haunts you and bids remembering, repeated thought and writing, especially when that thing is precisely about being haunted, in a certain way, about hesitating and staying one’s actions. it is odd to have an idea, an image, an off-hand comment or a hunch stay with you despite its refusal to cede its secrets. this is part of the practice of writing. learning to let stay. it is an urgent patience, a weird joy. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 2 2 the late christopher hitchens is well known enough for me to not pause for long over his work except to say that his adamant critiques of religion (hitchens, 2007) and other forms of totalitarianism were complemented by the work of richard dawkins (2006) and hitchens received, quite near his death, the richard dawkins award at the 2011 texas free thought convention, one of hitchens' final public appearances. from that appearance: christopher hitchens: some of you know, i suppose you all know now, that the words of one of my favorite poets ernest dowson are quite often with me. dowson stole them actually from the roman poet horace: non sum qualis eram, “i am not as i was.” . . . . in the meantime, we have the same job we've always had. there are no final solutions. there is no absolute truth. there is no supreme leader. there is no totalitarian solution that says “if you would just give up your freedom of inquiry, if you would simply abandon your critical faculties, a world of idiotic bliss can be yours.” you will certainly lose the faculties, and you may not know as a result, that idiotic bliss is even more idiotic than it looks. but we have to begin by repudiating all such claims. grand rabbis, chief ayatollahs, infallible popes, the peddlers of surrogate and mutant quasi-political religion and worship-the dear leader, the great leader, we have no need of any of this. and looking at them, and their record, and the pathos of their supporters, i realize that it is they who are the grand imposters, and my own imposture this evening was mild by comparison. (godlessuk, 2013) the reason i mention the connection to richard dawkins in particular is because of what i find to be a still-amazing youtube video clip of hitchens and douglas james wilson (objectivebob, 2010). reverend wilson is the pastor at christ church in moscow, idaho, and has had many intense and easily accessible public debates and talking-head news encounters with hitchens. this clip is the final moments of a 2009 documentary collision: christopher hitchens, vs. douglas wilson (documentaryondemand, 2013). wilson and hitchens appear to be in the back seat of a car and hitchens mentions how those (like himself) arguing against the divine design of things still take seriously the hairsbreadth of (what he understands to be) happenstance of “the goldilocks effect,” of the earth being just right in its relation to the sun and its sustenance: “you have to spend time thinking about it, working on it. it’s not a trivial [thing]” (objectivebob, 2010). hitchens refers to having had a particular conversation with richard dawkins. then this: christopher hitchens: . . . and then at one point. i think this is not on camera, i said, if i could covert every one in the world -not convert, if i could convince -to be a nonbeliever, and i’d really done brilliantly, and there's only one left. one more and then it would be done. there’d be no more religion in the world. no more deism, theism. [pause]. i wouldn’t do it. [pause]. and dawkins said, “what do you mean you wouldn't do it?” i said, “i don’t quite know why i wouldn’t do it.” and it’s not just because there’d be nothing left to argue and no one left to argue with. not just that. though it would be that. somehow, if i could drive it out of the world, i wouldn’t. and the incredulity with jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 2 3 which he [dawkins] looked at me stays with me still. i’ve got to say. (objectivebob, 2010) as with dawkins’ look of incredulity, this clip now stays with me. thoughts first about the aesthetic “punch” that we often feel when we read or hear something: the word for perception or sensation in greek was aesthesis, which means at root a breathing in or taking in of the world, the gasp, “aha,” the “uh” of the breath in wonder, shock, amazement, and aesthetic response. (hillman, 2006, p. 36) tersely put, this is the reason for all those drudgery pages in hans-georg gadamer’s truth and method (1989, pp. 42-100) and his attempts to rescue this phenomenon of aesthetic address (p. 299) from its tragic subjectivization and marginalization in our understanding of the experience of truth. this video hits me still, and when i quickly re-created hitchens’ words for my son over the holidays just passed, all he said was “yep.” me too. i wouldn't do it. and “it would not deserve the interest [i] take in it if it did not have something to teach [me] that [i] could not know by [my]sel[f]” (gadamer, 1989, p. xxxv). but at first (and still), i just suspected this might be so, and hitchens did, too, in a way. he himself remembered and retold this story and told it, as you can see in the video, with the sly grin of suspecting there’s something to it a kind of coyote grin, a bit self-satisfied, a bit expectant, a bit joyous. were it just a subjective incident with no loft or pitch to it beyond “moist gastric intimacy” (sartre, 1970, p. 4), re-telling it seems very odd sheer self-indulgence and entertainment. on the face of it at least, this is “not just that.” why do we re-tell? trying, perhaps, to work it out or, better, to see if something works out if you work it a bit: “something awakens our interest" (gadamer, 2001, p. 50). “something is going on, (im spiele ist), something is happening (sich abspielt)" (gadamer, 1989, p. 104). a clue, then, to gadamer's (1989, pp. 101-134) deep interest in (what is at) play (spiel) (and, i guess, in my interest in that hitchens video). something is going on. i suspect. so then the risk you run as a writer: maybe not, but only staying put will prove the case for good or ill. then there is that sort-of hoarder/gatherer/rummager thing that writers do --me, with this clip, saving it, transcribing it, wanting to remember it, telling people about it. there is something here that i need to keep with me, something of the way this idea hangs in the air, somehow, and then, too, of what this hesitation means. lord knows i’ve tried: compassion? sympathy? extinction? like saving a rare bird? knowing that if no one now believes these religious texts they quote, if no one adores these images and ideas, then something is perhaps irretrievably lost? loss of “the other” as a loss of oneself? levinas and the horror of facing the last face? pity? that it jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 2 4 would say something too much, too unbearable of me should i proceed? what about the secondlast believer? bluntly put, yuck to all this. and hence the irony, that many drafts of writing have been deleted and these deletions seem to have simply increased the glowing attraction of this clip. “[it] compels over and over, and the better one knows it, the more compelling it is. this is not a matter of mastering an area of study” (gadamer, 2007, p. 115). this is why, as a writer, i have repeatedly found that it is not just a matter of paying patient attention to the world --to little happenings-by like this clip -but doing so as if i will be answerable in writing to such things as arrive in (and, i must say, in part because of) such patient attending. that prospect --of being answerable in writing --intensifies attention in a most delicious way. and then comes the odd hermeneutic fidelity of trying to not betray this hovering linger of words and images and appeal and grins, but trying to keep it safe, trying to let it stand in itself, in its own repose. and then that impossible task, of trying to write so that the linger itself will be a bit legible in what i then write. the task of hermeneutic writing is to not fall for the falsehood that this lingering is an error that writing might fix. it is, rather, a truth that unfixes writing, makes it loft and swerve and exaggerate unpinned. this, of course, is why hermeneutic research is always prone to the writer's indulgences. the aim of writing is not giving myself free rein (latin indulgere) but giving this free rein by finding what of this can be eked out in words: “i wouldn’t do it.” “what do you mean you wouldn't do it?” i don't know what i mean. maybe that just attests to the deeply buried hermeneutic assertion, that its work is not about what people or texts or things or signs mean, but about what might happen if they were true. “it is only when the attempt to accept what is said as true fails that we try to “understand" the text . . . as another’s opinion” (gadamer, 1989, p. 294). “a text is not understood as a mere expression of life but is taken seriously in its claim to truth” (gadamer, 1989, p. 297). in remembering, repeating, and caring for this chance little clip, it serves as a sort of sentinel waiting for an arrival that would bespeak its good sense. it is as if this tale itself provides a way to remain alert to the day-to-day events that come and go, as if it is waiting for its own reprieve, waiting to be called for, waiting to be recognized by some kin of the world-the off-hand event or bit of reading or news story or gesture of a child in a grade one class, that will summon it, finally, to be what it is. i'm waiting for it to lift off my shoulders in a flight of its own, this sorrow. told and retold in almost ritual repetitions, worrying over bones or the great and ancient monastic murmuring of texts out loud and under the breath, seeking the truth of what it repeats, seeks its redemption in words. monkish practices of scholarship. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 2 5 telling and re-telling are attempts to let it find its freedom from my own obsessive remembering of it within the confines of a life whose imposture is both too great and too small by itself to think this through. writing this aims to free me from it and to free it from me. “the aim of interpretation, it could be said, is not just another interpretation but human freedom” (smith, 1999, p. 29). to face these fleeting things and try to entail them with the right attention, the right affection, with a devotion that is not about deepening the attachments of believing (the first steps towards totalitarian solutions [see jardine, 2015]) but the wonder that just might turn attachment into love. the staying of hitchens’ words in the face the last person to be convinced is the same stay as the pleasure over not quite knowing why. however, i don’t quite know why. references costello, e. (1993). the birds will still be singing. from e. costello, the juliet letters. warner brothers cd #45180. lyrics by e. costello, copyright plangent visions music inc. dawkins, r. (2006). the god delusion. boston, ma: houghton mifflin. documentaryondemand (2013, april 20). colisao: ateu x pastor [video file]. (this is a subtitled version of collision: christopher hitchens, vs. douglas wilson. level4 studio, phoenix az. director: darren doane, october 27, 2009, asin: b002m3shto). retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jwysecocc8. gadamer, h-g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev.ed, j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum books. gadamer, h-g. (2001). gadamer in conversation: reflections and commentary (r. palmer, ed. & trans.) new haven, ct: yale university press. gadamer, h-g. (2007). from word to concept: the task of hermeneutics as philosophy. in r. palmer (ed. & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 108-122). evanston, il: northwestern university press. godless uk (2013, june 30). christopher hitchens last public appearance dawkins award [video file dated october 8th 2011]. retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud973couvys. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 2 6 hillman, j. (2006). anima mundi: returning the soul to the world. in j. hillman, city and soul (pp. 27-49). putnam, ct: spring publications. hitchens, c. (2007). god is not great: how religion poisons everything, new york, ny: twelve books. jardine, d. (2015). an ode to xmas present. on-line: https://www.academia.edu/10101433/an_ode_to_xmas_present. objectivebob (2010, july 5). christopher hitchens makes a shocking confession [video file]. retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9tmwfkdwiy. sartre, j.p. (1970). intentionality: a fundamental idea in husserl's phenomenology. journal for the british society for phenomenology, 1(2), 3-5. smith, d.g. (1999). pedagon: interdisciplinary essays on pedagogy and culture. new york, ny: peter lang. microsoft word mcconnellfinal.docx 1 faculty of nursing, university of calgary corresponding author: shelagh mcconnell email: mcconnsj@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics september 27, 2012 the author(s) 2012 the hidden nature of death and grief shelagh mcconnell1, nancy j. moules1, graham mccaffrey1, & shelley raffin-bouchal1 abstract western culture can be described as death-denying and youth-obsessed. yet this has not always been the case. only a few generations ago, death was very much part of life where people died at home with their families members caring for them. a shift occurred, in part, because of the unprecedented advances in medical science that the western world has seen over the past 40 years. health care professionals now have the knowledge and the technology to prolong life in ways that were previously not only unattainable, but inconceivable. regardless, the reality that death will eventually come for each of us has not changed; merely our perception of it has. this perception is influenced by the hidden nature of death in our society. this begs the questions: if death in our culture is something to hide, to conceal, and to keep secret, then what does that say about our ability to express grief? what does this mean for those who face it as part of their chosen profession? how might we understand the nature of suffering for those who turn toward the suffering of others? this paper interpretively examines the nature of hidden death and hidden grief in our society. keywords death, grief, hermeneutics, hidden, pediatric palliative care nursing death is the ugly fact which nature has to hide, and she hides it well. alexander smith through my* years of practice as an acute care nurse at a large pediatric hospital, i have often been in the presence of dying children and grieving families. i have learned how to care for these children and how to talk about death with their family members. i have also learned about the culture of hiding death and grief from not only other patients and families in the hospital, but also from my colleagues, friends, and family members. the expectation that nurses mcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 2 and other health care providers are somehow immune to loss and grief intrigues me and has inspired me to examine death and grief beyond the confines of the hospital and to explore the topic within the larger context of society. western culture can be described as death-denying and youth-obsessed. as a result, people go to great lengths to disguise even the signs of natural aging. one quick look at popular magazines and television advertisements will support the truth in that statement. the natural process of aging is hidden and so, too, is the dying process and death itself. ever more, the elderly are hidden in nursing homes; the dying are hidden in hospitals and hospices. in fact, daniel callahan, a philosopher who has written extensively on topics related to ethics and health policy wrote that “the present period might best be characterized as a revolt against death itself” (callahan, 2009, p. 106). only a few generations ago, death was very much part of life. for instance, in canada in 1926, one in five children would not survive to their first birthday (statistics canada, 2008). as a result, just about everyone would have lost a child close to them: son, daughter, neice, nephew, or grandchild. by comparison, today in canada fewer than one in 100 children die before reaching the age of one (statistics canada, 2008). therefore, today fewer of us are directly affected by the death of a child. death was closer; death was familiar. family members cared for their dying loved ones at home. death was not a private loss but was taken as a blow to all those who survived, both family and strangers. death required public affirmation of human solidarity against a harsh and indifferent nature. it was not to be hidden: families should be there when death was at hand, and the door thrown open to neighbors and even those passing by in the street. (callahan, 2009, p. 104) death is no longer perceived to be so close. people do not seem to live with the “ancient belief that [death] is inevitable, an immutable and unchangeable fact and human fate” (callahan, 2009, p. 104). a shift occurred, in part, because of the unprecedented advances in medical science that the western world has seen over the past 40 years. health care professionals have the knowledge and the technology to prolong life in ways that were previously not only unattainable, but inconceivable. the reality that death will eventually come for each of us has not changed; merely our perception of it has. advancements in medical science and technology have given us a false sense of being able to defy death, to avoid it, and perhaps even to postpone it indefinitely. william haseltine, ceo of human genome sciences, once said that “death is nothing but a series of preventable diseases” (callahan, 2009, p. 107, citing fisher, 1999) which is absurd, but this statement does highlight our cultural desire to conquer all diseases. it also draws attention to our cultural expectations around death and dying—the expectation that the ultimate goal is to keep people alive at all costs. increasingly, we see examples where “our technology has surpassed our humanity” (ferrell, 2006, p. 927). we see instances where patients are kept alive through the use of machines and medication which surely prolong suffering and certainly do not prevent the patient’s inevitable death. the hidden nature of death the word “hidden” means “being out of sight, not readily apparent, concealed” (merriam-webster, 2012). as the word “hidden” is closely related to “conceal” it is also relatmcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 3 ed to the idea of aletheia, which is the greek word meaning truth-as-unconcealment (online etymology dictionary, 2012). aletheia, whose etymological roots are connected to the word lethe, which literally means “forgetfulness, oblivion” (online etymology dictionary, 2012) is also, according to greek mythology, a river in hades. western society has become accustomed to the concealment of death from our lack of knowledge of what goes on behind the scenes of a funeral home, to our euphemistic language when talking about death, to keeping our grief out of sight. some may argue that death is not hidden in western culture as our fascination with death is obvious in popular media: from movies and television to crime novels and even in news reports. stories of death attract interest and attention, yet when it comes to the death of someone close to us, when it comes to experiencing a “real” death, this fascination is often replaced with not only grief, but also disbelief and a desire to hide from experiencing emotional pain. western society increasingly caters to this desire to hide and to avoid facing the reality of death and grief. for instance, this is demonstrated in the decreased popularity of open-casket funerals in favour of “soothing ceremonies of remembrance” (callahan, 2009, p. 103). i have attended many funerals, particularly of children who i came to know through my work as a nurse. frequently, the memorial services for children from traditionally western families have been focused on a “celebration of life” with photos and toys, but no caskets or urns to be seen. often at these services, those in attendance are somewhat restrained in their outward expression of grief. i have also attended opencasket funerals of children from other cultures where handling of the body was common as was the public display of grief. for instance, i attended one funeral where the mother literally screamed in emotional agony through the entire service and at one point actually got into the casket of her dead child. the image of that haunts me even today. i now wonder if that event was particularly troubling because of our society’s desire to hide death and grief. am i merely uncomfortable with being denied the protection and luxury of concealed death and grief? the hidden nature of grief if death in our culture is something to hide, to conceal, and to keep secret, then what does that say about our ability to express grief? the message is simply “in a word, dear friends, keep your grief to yourself” (callahan, 2009, p. 105). it would seem then that hidden death is accompanied by hidden grief. the expression of grief, even by those who are identified as the bereaved, is not welcomed to be openly displayed for all to witness. furthermore, grief in our society is expected to have a time limit, despite the research that would suggest that grief is never overcome, but adapted to (attig, 1996; moules, simonson, prins, angus, & bell, 2004; neimeyer, 2001). it would be impossible for me to recall all the times i have heard statements such as “my dad died six months ago and i thought my mom would be doing better by now” or “if her son died three years ago, then why is she still not over it?” as a result, grievers are forced to hide their grief to keep it a secret. despite the expectations of society to conceal grief, the expression of grief is not always hidden intentionally. grief has a way of evading description (moules et al., 2004) as it lacks clarity and is difficult to define just by its very nature (cowles & rodgers, 1991; jacob, 1993; rodgers & cowles, 1991). the challenge in articulating grief is apparent through the use of metaphors (e.g., mcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 4 describing grief a journey, a neverending fall, or an uninvited houseguest) as well as silences when those suffering talk about their experience of grief (moules et al., 2004). this is the inarticulate nature of grief (moules, simonson, fleiszer, prins, & glasgow, 2007). it would seem then that grief itself at times seeks to be concealed. the obligation of those who face death even when our culture encourages us to hide death and grief, some people refuse to do so. in fact, they turn towards it. interestingly, “to hide” means not only “to conceal” but also “to turn away” (merriam-webster, 2012). there must be something special about those people who choose to go against the norm and face death, something different about those who choose to turn toward death and not hide from it. some people are attracted to professions that encounter death because they have a personal history of loss, while others have spiritual reasons for wanting to work with those who are approaching the end of their lives. having met a variety of professionals who care for the dying, i do not believe there is any one reason why people do this work. some nurses, physicians, social workers, and chaplains devote their life’s work to caring for the dying and the bereaved. others work hard at it, but after a few years they move on to other jobs. nevertheless, what i have experienced and observed when faced with death and dying is that there is the sense of obligation to the patient and family. “obligation” means “something one is bound to do,” a commitment, and a responsibility to another (merriam-webster, 2012). caputo wrote that obligation is a feeling that comes over us when others are in need (caputo, 1993). obligation happens before we enter the room and stand at the patient’s bedside (caputo, 1993). we are suddenly overcome by something that demands our response (caputo, 1993). the power of the obligation is strong enough to override our desire to run from the room, to cover our eyes, to pretend that death has not come to call. despite wanting to close the door and avoid witnessing tremendous pain and suffering, our sense of obligation will often take over and demand our presence. this is despite the fact that there may be no tasks to complete, no conversations to have, no charting to write. yet our sense of obligation compels us to remain at the bedside and to simply bear witness to what is transpiring. the term “bear witness” means “to testify” and “to authenticate” (merriam-webster, 2012). there seems to be an obligation to witness times of suffering and death. etymologically, the word “witness” is related to the word “martyr” (online etymological dictionary, 2012) meaning someone who constantly suffers (merriam-webster, 2012). in the current vernacular, being a martyr is not considered to be a particularly good thing; however, if we consider its use as someone who suffers with others, the term is particularly appropriate. i would be remiss if i did not also explore the meaning of “to bear” as i have with the word “witness.” the meaning of “to bear” is particularly appropriate in the context of supporting the dying and the bereaved: “to support a weight or strain” and, with this meaning, it is a synonym for “to suffer.” it would seem that suffering is a fundamental part of bearing witness as both words are linked to the word suffer. furthermore, the word “bearer” has the historical meaning of “one who helps carry a corpse to the grave” (online etymological dictionary, 2012). nurses usually do not literally carry a corpse to a grave. nevertheless, i do think the work of nurses, and othmcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 5 ers who work with the dying, carry the patient and family through the experience by way of the care and presence we provide in times of suffering and grief. interestingly enough, if i take the word “bear” yet one step further and examine the homophone “bare” it further enriches the meaning of bearing witness. “bare” means “lacking appropriate covering” with synonyms such as “to uncover, to reveal, to expose, to uncloak” (merriam-webster, 2012). not only is “bearing witness” the idea of authenticating suffering, but also revealing the suffering through our presence. i have been a witness to dying and grief, but found i had neither words of consolation nor gestures of comfort. i could simply bear witness to be present, to carry, to authenticate, and to suffer. the hidden nature of working with the dying and the dead when we witness pain, suffering, dying, and death, we are changed. what does this mean for those who face it as part of their chosen profession? how might we understand the nature of suffering for those who turn toward the suffering of others? is this experience of witnessing suffering as complex as the experience of grief itself? i have spent my nursing career working with the pediatric palliative care population. while i had once aspired to be one of those nurses who spend their careers caring for dying children, i came to realize that this was not to be my journey. i am not one of those nurses. i am no longer able to sit with the dying and the bereaved. i have been with families in moments of intense grief and suffering. when i hear others talk of their experiences with the dying, my own stories begin to resurface, begin to reveal themselves. my own memories of suffering are no longer tightly contained in a box in my brain marked “i wish i could forget.” why is that? why not tell these stories rather than conceal them? is there a burden to these stories? does the burden lie in telling stories that others do not want to hear? as a newly graduated nurse, i very quickly came to realize that my friends and family were interested in the cute and uplifting stories about the children i cared for at the hospital. they were not, however, interested in the stories of death and dying. they did not want to hear about suffering and pain. the burden, then, is mine to carry—a burden that cannot be shared. even if i wanted to tell some of my stories, i would not know where to begin. such is the inarticulate nature of grief (moules et al., 2007). yet i have heard families of children who have died tell their stories. what makes my version of the story inarticulate? i want to understand this better. i had the opportunity to interview two of my colleagues on this topic for a research project. one nurse spoke at length about a palliative child with whom she had developed a special bond. the nurse even went so far as to say “[child’s name] and her family were like family to me.” then i asked her how she reacted when she learned of the child’s death, and she said that she was devastated by the loss and was overcome with sadness. then she quickly added, “but i don’t have grief.” why deny the existence of grief a universal human experience that is completely appropriate in the face of loss and death? perhaps nurses are not experiencing grief, but rather something else? if not grief, then what? or perhaps nurses simply believe that the ownership of grief is held by the patient and family and not by the nursing staff? this notion is consistent with some of the work of doka (1989) on disenfranchised grief. in the case of nurses, they are often not seen to be a member of the bereaved mcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 6 family. therefore, they hesitate to express grief, thus often forcing them into silence (kuhn, 1989). when nurses experience loss through their work, they often believe that they neither have the right to grieve nor is it their place to do so (lev, 1989). even when nurses have developed a close relationship to a patient who dies, they are denied the opportunity to grieve; such is the hidden nature of nurses’ grief (clements & bradley, 2005). there may be something else at play here. the combination of the inarticulate nature of grief and disenfranchised grief would seem sufficient to begin to understand the phenomena. yet i am drawn back to the work of caputo on obligation. certainly there is an overwhelming sense of obligation to bear witness to death and suffering. however, in the context of nurses’ work, particularly in the acute care setting, there are also the issues of managing conflicting obligations, responsibilities, and expectations. the pain of turning towards death is intensified in the chaos of acute care. i vividly remember a shift when i was assigned three patients: two with treatable illnesses (one with a urinary tract infection and the other recovering from a tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy) and one who was actively dying. i badly wanted to be available to the dying child and her family in those last precious moments. i wanted to have the time to try to make those moments count. yet because of my obligations to the other two children and their families, i kept being called away by those other responsibilities and compelled to respond to the demands imposed upon me. in comparison to the needs of the dying child, the demands of the other families seemed trivial. one father yelled at me for being 10 minutes late giving his son tylenol. because of our duty to protect the privacy of others, i could not tell him why i was late. i could not tell him that i was making hand and foot prints of a dying child. i wanted to scream at his selfishness, at the unfairness of parents having to watch their children die, and the failure i felt for not being able to protect a child from death the ultimate human failure. when grief refuses to remain concealed we all seem to play a part in this concealment. nevertheless, the stories of death, dying, and suffering live within us stories that may be hidden, but are never completely forgotten. we all carry grief. we all live with grief, which seems to need to expose itself every so often. i have worked very hard to keep my stories of grief hidden. even so, they find their way out. often at unexpected times, stories of grief take over my vocal cords and make themselves known to an unsuspecting audience. perhaps it is unnatural for grief to be hidden indefinitely for it is not its true nature. grief likes to appear and disappear as it sees fit. grief is a trickster. grief is unpredictable. it hides between our words, refusing to be captured, then comes tumbling out unexpectedly at another time. it would seem then that, on occasion, grief wants to be let out through our stories. in a sense, grief itself wants its burden to be shared. footnote *although this paper is co-authored, it is written in the first person of the first author: mcconnell. references attig, t. (1996). how we grieve: relearning the world. new york, ny: oxford university press. callahan, d. (2009). death, mourning, and medical progress. perspectives in biology mcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 7 and medicine, 52(1), 103-115. doi: 10.1353/ pbm.0.0067 caputo, j. d. (1993). against ethics: contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. bloomington, in: indiana university press. clements, p. t., & bradley, j. (2005). when a young patient dies. rn, 68(4), 40-43. cowles, k. v., & rogers, b. l. (1991). the concept of grief: a foundation for nursing research and practice. research in nursing & health, 14(2), 119-127. doka, k. j. (1989). introduction. in k. j. doka (ed.), disenfranchised grief: recognizing hidden sorrow. (pp. 287-299). new york, ny: lexington books. ferrell, b. r. (2006). understanding the moral distress of nurses witnessing medically futile care. oncology nurses forum, 33(5), 922-930. jacob, s. r. (1993). an analysis of the concept of grief. journal of advanced nursing, 18(11), 1787-1794. doi: 10.10461j.13652648.1993. 18111787.x kuhn, d. (1989). a pastoral counselor looks at silence as a factor in disenfranchised grief. in k.j. doka (ed.), disenfranchised grief: recognizing hidden sorrow. (pp. 287-299). new york, ny: lexington books. lev, e. (1989). a nurse’s perspective on disenfranchised grief. in k. j. doka (ed.), disenfranchised grief: recognizing hidden sorrow. (pp. 287-299). new york, ny: lexington books. merriam-webster, 2012. merriam-webster online: http://www.merriam-webster.com/ moules, n. j., simonson, k., fleiszer, a. r., prins, m., & glasgow, b. (2007). the soul of sorrow work: grief and therapeutic interventions with families. journal of family nursing, 13(1), 117-141. doi: 10.1177/107 4840706297484 moules, n. j., simonson, k., prins, m., angus, p., & bell, j. m. (2004). making room for grief: walking backwards and living forward. nursing inquiry, 11(2), 99-107. neimeyer, r. a. (2001). reauthoring life narratives: grief therapy as meaning reconstruction. israel journal of psychiatry and related science, 38(3-4), 171-183. online etymological dictionary, 2012. online etymological dictionary: http://www. etymonline.com/ rodgers, b. l., & cowles, k. v. (1991). the concept of grief: an analysis of classical and contemporary thought. death studies, 15(5), 443-458. statistics canada. (2008). canadian demographics at a glance. retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/91-003-x/91003-x2007001-eng.pdf microsoft word jardine 2016 coreected proof.docx corresponding author: david w. jardine, phd email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 28, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 “there will not always be teachers like this”: for g.b.m. david w. jardine, phd the buddha said, “because there will not always be teachers like this . . . make a painting in the gate-house of a five-part wheel of cyclical existence, around the circumference of which are the twelve dependent-arisings in both forward and reverse progressions.” the wheel of existence was then drawn. (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 325) it’s a funny thing, when one of your teachers dies, especially at a distance of days and lives and circumstances. i remember in 2002, preparing to give a talk to some gathering of the nursing faculty at the university of calgary when i found out that h.g. gadamer had died, cut off in his prime at 102 years. it had the effect of stilling and suspending what then followed, a talk that has since fallen from memory except for that suspense. the death of a teacher casts the teaching up into the air. a painting in the gate-house will not quite suffice. pictures can be deceptive, perhaps especially ones drawn from memory. now, early afternoon, saturday, january 16, 2016, another old teacher whom i haven’t seen in decades has died: dr. g. b. madison, most recently professor emeritus from the department of philosophy at mcmaster university, hamilton, ontario. he was my ma thesis supervisor and teacher and, for a brief while, friend. our paths separated years ago under circumstances best only hinted at. i can only attest to old memories of grad school and to the paths and prospects that opened up in front of me because of him, sometimes in spite of him, eventually without him. gary was my first example of a living philosopher, full-bodied, teasing, angry, insecure, grinning, playful, sharp, so sharp. eye-glint. pipe. beret. cane. the detail that he demanded and allowed in my tortuous parsing of the work of edmund husserl has held me in good stead ever since. he was the teacher i needed then, who jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 4 2 let me do what was good for me then and still: settling down and teasing every word. good practice. gary’s love of language and his example of how it teases us as much as, perhaps more than, vice versa – well, this repeated freshening fitted my musical ear. the play of language. studied melodies. it’s still how i write, how i think, how i think the world exists. my thesis (jardine, 1976) ended up 181 double-spaced pages, typed on a grey remington upright with carbon paper and a second sheet behind. 321 footnotes. i had a silly contest going with mark franklin, a fellow grad student, regarding who could have the most footnotes in the shortest amount of text. his thesis was on analogical language and the names of god (a great, indirect influence on my work still to come [jardine, morgan, & franklin, 1986; jardine & morgan, 1987a, 1987b; and far beyond this]) while mine had the ominous title of the question of phenomenological immanence. it sure is great to be in your early twenties. four twenty-page papers a term for years in a row. and the still rattling of lineages of work, delves, deep delves. grad school. feeling like i was on to something, in on some secret. hush, now. it’s one i still keep. for me, back then, it was a sort of late-60s dream come oddly, kind-of, true, sort of -a gathering of all those old conversations, night after night in the shade of 1967, 1968. reading alan watts. waiting. then philosophy and religious studies as an undergraduate. then a philosophy ma. phenomenology. great greased underlines of eugen fink’s (1970) spectacular 75-page book chapter, “the phenomenological philosophy of edmund husserl and contemporary criticism.” loving to read it precisely because it was so difficult and just the thing i needed. writing was still in its infancy, but it seemed an honoured and honourable practice, worth enduring being bad at, worth getting better. this, too, was part of gary’s orbit, a light i needed, cast in just the right direction and angle. some years later, it was gary who invited me to talk at the inaugural meeting of the canadian society for hermeneutics and postmodern thought (created by gary as a sub-division of the canadian philosophical society) in winnipeg, manitoba, summer of 1986, as part of what was then called learned societies conference. “you’d be just the guy to talk about hermeneutics and pedagogy.” well, okay, but not really. it was a terrible talk, frankly. i had been unemployed for just over a year and was facing, in the audience, not only my ma supervisor, but my ph.d. supervisor as well (dr. dieter misgeld, then of o.i.s.e.), as well as, gulp, the hiring committee that i was to have later met from the university of manitoba’s faculty of education. that meeting, i expect partly because of this talk, never took place. all this was agonizingly slowly to shift, because it was also in winnipeg in 1986 that i first met dr. david g. smith, where we recognized in each other a long-lost brother. misplaced glasses of wine with gary and john king (later of the university of calgary press) and david and others lost to memory in a lounge overlooking rising clouds of mosquitos on the river. happenstance. memory. mcmaster university, long evenings at the phoenix graduate student lounge learning to think as if our lives depended on it. and then summer picnics with gary and other students (including my dear gail –we’ve just celebrated our 42nd last december 28th), blistering hot southern ontario heat and cicada whines jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 4 3 (i recall it being 106 degrees fahrenheit one time) and drifting in small creeks, gary giggling at the sight of leeches, and, of course more mosquito-y air. grad school. it’s not that we’ve kept “in touch” at all over several decades now passed. this “in touch” in its colloquial usage isn’t all that is in effect with a teacher, not necessarily, anyway. memory lingers, and voice, and examples, and half-heard sentences or line traces through lineages, citations, underlinings. teachings, and manners of speaking, cadences of words, examples, unvoiced expectations and so on. i’ve always said to prospective teachers that we stand in front of our students, not just as purveyors of teachings, but as an example of how life might turn out. did i mention that gary, unlike so many others at the time in the philosophy department at mcmaster, seemed young, seemed nearly but not quite one of us, or at least facing our way? john thomas, lovely gracious man, full professor, dozing off mid-conversation during a meeting with him, as the late afternoon sun streamed through leaded windows in his corner office of university hall. ian and dave thomas’ father. plato scholar. gentleman. older. gary was 11 years my senior. it is important to consider slowly and well how good teachers set you free from themselves so that you can measure yourself against “the thing itself.” i noticed in gary’s self-composed obituary that “a sizable portion of his estate” was given to the brothers of the good shepherd, in hamilton, ontario. back in the day, i asked him about his for-me-strange holding together of catholicism and existentialism, philosophizing and what, belief? his response was just right: “the life-world is full of contradictions.” that response outlives him and i’ve carried it with me and, like most good teachings, it is still taking years to catch up to it. it still seems in retrospect that gary suffered this particular teaching more than i. circumstance. causes and conditions. too bad, of course, that the contradictions got to be too much between teacher and student. we parted ways decades ago. 35 years+ buddhism insists that good teachers are “pleased by practice” (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 179), so a brief recollection to end, on “the painting in the gate-house.” i recall in a class whose name and date have faded from memory, that gary drew a large rectangle on the chalkboard and asked us to populate it with every conceivable topic we could imagine from our experience of philosophical work. subjects, objects, sense data, god, mathematics, language, ideas, will, emotion, space, time, categories, existence and essence, thought and word, aquinas, immanuel kant, a.j. ayer (who had recently given a talk in convocation hall), images, “the emotions,” and cascades of other names and books and on and on, an ever-expanding picture of it all, in the corner of which gary wrote “etc.” in order to capture that its continuing is part of this picture as well. he then asked about the person making the picture and we sat and roiled and roiled and still roil in this lovely spot. back in that class, it seemed like effort to “get myself into the picture” – the effort at a selfenclosing philosophy that aims to “complete the picture” -is faulty because there is always an existential subjectivity who is picturing this “world picture” (heidegger, 1987). in our class, we tried mightily to add this picturing subjectivity to the picture, but, of course, ended up with a nebulous sense of subjectivity escaping the picture all over again. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 4 4 but, of course, me, at the time, charmed by edmund husserl’s transcendental phenomenology, imagined this nebulous sense to point to a transcendental subjectivity that beheld the world as an array of transcendental intentionalities. like this from that tortuous eugen fink chapter (1970, p. 110): the epoche is not a mundane inhibiting of the ontic and the intramundane belief in the being of the world. as the persistent and radical deactivation of the belief in the world, the epoche is the disconnecting of the belief in the human performer of beliefs, that is, the bracketing of the world-belief’s self interpretation by which it apperceives itself as being in the world. now . . . the true subject of belief can be uncovered for the first time: the transcendental ego, for whom the world (the intramundane subject and the totality of its objects) is a universe of transcendental acceptances. oh i just love reading that over and over! delicious and awful all at once, it still itches a scratch. so in retrospect, i think i’ve had all this somewhat upside-down. we don’t end up with a world-less (i.e., “not in the picture”) subjectivity standing in front of a picture that it is not part of. subjectivity is a by-product of picturing the world and is therefore precisely not something that eludes. it is dependently co-arising, so seeking some sort of recourse in subjectivity is, indirectly, seeking recourse in the penumbra of the very picture/picturing we falsely think we are turning away from in turning to subjectivity. it’s all imaginary, this cycle, this circling, this painting in the gate-house. wrought. getting caught in this circling is itself a by-product of a sense of threat, leading to contraction, reification, hostility, protectiveness, further waves of threat, and so on. and all this, i suggest, is because of a refusal, at to accept the first nobel truth, the reality that all life is suffering, and the squirms to avoid it that then arise: you must accept [suffering] when [it] arise[s] because (1) if you do not do this, in addition to the basic suffering, you have the suffering of worry that is produced by your own thoughts, and then the suffering becomes very difficult for you to bear; (2) if you accept the suffering, you let the basic suffering be and do not stop it, but you never have the suffering of worry that creates discontentment when you focus on the basic suffering; and (3) since you are using a method to bring even basic sufferings into the path, you greatly lessen your suffering, so you can bear it. therefore, it is very crucial that you generate the patience that accepts suffering. (tsong-kha-pa, 2004, pp. 172-173) gary faced something of this eventuality just now, just recently, as we all will. picturing his dying is good practice, but beware. the picture and the picturing and the picturer: all are empty of self-existence, as is this half-remembered reminiscence. i hope, still and now, that gary would have been pleased by this meagre attempt at practice, a little gift to that grin and glinted eye i can still picture in mostly fond, distant memory. those who know me well know full well how much i’d love to raise a glass in good cheer, but i can no longer bear it. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 4 5 references fink, e. (1970). the phenomenological philosophy of edmund husserl and contemporary criticism. in r. o. elveton, the phenomenology of husserl (pp. 73-148). chicago il: quadrangle books. heidegger, m. (1987). the age of the world picture. in m. heidegger, the question concerning technology and other essays (pp. 115-154). new york, ny: garland publishing. husserl, e. (1970). the crisis of european science and transcendental phenomenology. evanston il: northwestern university press. jardine, d. (1976). the question of phenomenological immanence. unpublished master's thesis, department of philosophy, mcmaster university, hamilton, on, canada. on line: www.digitalcommons.mcmaster.ca/opendissertations/4567/. jardine, d., morgan, g., & franklin, m. (1986). analogy, self-identity and family identity: outline of research in progress. canadian journal of education, 11(4), 584-586. jardine, d., & morgan, g. (1987a). analogy as a model for the development of representational abilities in children. educational theory, 37(3), 209-218. jardine, d., & morgan, g. (1987b). analogical thinking in young children and the use of logicomathematical knowledge as a paradigm in jean piaget’s genetic epistemology. quarterly newsletter of the laboratory of comparative human cognition, 9(4), 95-101. tsong-kha-pa (2000). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (lam rim chen mo). vol. 1. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. tsong-kha-pa (2004). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (lam rim chen mo). vol. 2. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. corresponding author: n.j. moules email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics may 9, 2015 the author(s) 2015 out of order: to debbie and dave, chris and bill, mj and john katherine bright, merilee brockway, gelenn carrera, barbara kathol, elizabeth keys, nancy j moules, alexandra robinson, lorraine smithmacdonald, & anila virani (note: authors are ordered alphabetically, not in terms of contribution) abstract in this paper, a professor and a group of doctoral students reflect on the video out of order: dealing with the death of a child, treating the video as research on the topic of grief. the video was shown to the group and then all individuals offered pieces of interpretive writing to show their understanding of what the “participants” in the video were helping us understand about the topic. keywords grief, death of a child, hermeneutics, interpretation there is a film that continues to draw me (moules) as a nursing educator and as a researcher in the hermeneutic tradition. it is a film about the experiences of three dyads of parents who suffered the experience of having a child die1. this is a very local, personal film, made for therapeutic purposes to offer help to other parents experiencing the unimaginable and never expected experience of being a bereaved parent. as an educator and researcher, i choose this film deliberately it is poignant, powerful, painful, raw, and truthful. i have “used” it in classes on grief because it is so powerful. i have also repeatedly used it in graduate level research classes. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 2 i myself have likely watched this film close to 50 times and i know it almost by heart. i ask graduate students if we can treat this delicate and heartfelt video as akin to a transcript of an interview of what it is to be a parent whose child has died. in doing so, it opens itself to the “tragic and loving” relationship of language in interpretation (moules, 2002; moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015). i offer this video to students as an invitation to interpretation in all of the rawness of transcripts and unfiltered words, tears, and disclosures. i invite them to take up one aspect of the film that addresses them; i ask them to go away and write about that thing that spoke to them. we part company for only about 45 minutes and then return to read aloud our interpretations. without exception, this process of giving ourselves over to the words of these parents, to try to find our own words to give them the respect and honor they ask of us, and then to read our own work aloud to others – to see how our words interact and our interpretations grow and change – is nothing short of miraculous. nothing is so purely the trace of the mind as is writing but nothing is so dependent on the understanding mind either. in deciphering and interpreting it, a miracle takes place: the transformation of something alien and dead into total contemporaneity and familiarity….that is why the capacity to read, to understand what is written is like a secret art, even a magic that frees and binds us. (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 163) i have been engaging in some version of this pedagogical exercise for many years. this year in a doctoral course on analysis in qualitative research, i listened on the edge of my seat with every sense attuned to these doctoral students read aloud their shy, awkward, beautiful, embarrassed, and humble responses to the video. we offer them here as one way that applied hermeneutic interpretation can take a shape. more, we offer them as a thank you to the parents who spoke their hearts in the video. “i could not stay where the policeman stood” lorraine smith-macdonald i could not “stay where the policeman stood.” it is a simple statement, a statement that on the surface means nothing. the policeman does not matter; he is only the bearer of bad news. it is what he says that matters. he is irrelevant. and yet, is possible that he represents more? that it does matter to say “i could not stay where the policeman stood”? to stay means “to cease going forward, to become halted.” this is the parody with death. when the recipient hears the death announcement, they often want to run, escape, and leave that place. and yet the reality of death is such that all of life (for that moment) has come to halt; it has ceased going forward. and it is not just in those initial moments. for many grievers, that experience is repeated over and over. they can no longer stay in the presence of those people, those places, and even those things that remind them of their beloved. they must go; they must leave; they must find new places, maybe even finding new ways to flee the painful reality of the death. the policeman cannot always be present. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 3 but as far away from the grief as the grievers run, there is always the experience of finding themselves stopped, halted. the policeman once again reappears. perhaps it is in our favorite shop, a song on the radio, a food we once ate together. grief always draws us back to the very place that it all began. grief requires us to stay where the policeman stood. we must hear what he has to say. we must in time come to accept and believe his words. in time, this tension between running and stopping will quiet, and one day even maybe even stop. then the griever can say “i stayed where the policeman stood.” the soft place of grief katherine bright “a soft place to land”… for couples that have lost a child there is no getting on with life. there is no choice to move on. if it weren’t for the restlessness that accompanies grief, these couples would have no momentum at all. but their grief doesn’t provide them with a distinct direction or destination. their grief feels more like the shock of being pushed out of an airplane and being out of control while they are freefalling through the air. as they are losing altitude, they have a sensation that they are searching for something. exactly what they are looking for is difficult to pinpoint. maybe it is a something, maybe it is a person, or just maybe it is just the desire to find something so that they don’t have to be alone with their thoughts. if someone is by his or her side, then he or she can share their loss or maybe to just tell them what they are going to do. but maybe that person won’t know what to do either, maybe that person will be just as lost as they are. maybe they are searching for their partner in order to come together rather than floating aimlessly on their own. but will they be able to hear their partner’s sadness? how can couples share the experience of a loss of a child so closely but suffer it so differently? maybe they both need a comfortable place to go and maybe it will be better to if they have someone with them when they find their soft place to land. maybe they will be that soft place to land for their partner or maybe the other person will be their comfortable place to stay. and just maybe the role of a safe place will be passed back and forth between the two partners. regardless, they hope to find their soft place to land. without words – merilee brockway this excerpt originated out of my need to make people feel better as well as my own reticence when interacting with people that have suffered a loss. what struck me from watching the video was the concept of understanding how people who have experienced the loss of a loved one need for others to understand them and what they have moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 4 been through. if not to understand, then it is to acknowledge their experience, to ask about how they are doing. dave suggested that in demonstrating understanding, people should provide less advice and more hugs. this is an interesting concept to consider. a hug is an affectionate embrace, the surrounding of one with another’s arms. to hug is to foster, to cherish, to enclose, to provide comfort. the word hug can also mean to think and consider. one can feel protected and safe within a hug; it can be a source of courage. a hug is a physical manifestation of the support, understanding, and protection that was called upon by many of the participants in this video. an embrace can say so much more than words and it will rarely offend. i think that, in avoiding the conversation of “how are you doing” when speaking to someone that has suffered a loss, we are protecting ourselves from discomfort, but also we may be acting out of fear of offending the person who had suffered the loss. perhaps in offering a hug, we can acknowledge the pain and loss they are experiencing, and provide the support, both physically and emotionally of which they are seeking. the embodiment of grief – barbara kathol grief has a visceral effect, a strong physicality as one moves through towards healing. recounting their experience of grief, the parents in the film used active, physical descriptors to tell their story. grief and sadness were experienced as overwhelming, over-taking, and encompassing their whole body. noting a lack of attention to how a person’s body experiences loss, hentz (2002) interviewed women who had experienced a significant loss of a loved one to discover “…the body memory following a loss…” (p. 161). hentz suggested that to study grief includes an understanding “…of the wisdom of the body as the natural self experiencing the world” (p. 164). free falling upon hearing the news of the loss of their child, the parents described a feeling of falling and collapsing. the parent experienced a physical descent, a sense of free falling without destination or purpose. the sense of falling was a manifestation of the overwhelming grief. the solid, comfortable ground of their lives was gone in an instant; the earth was pulled out from under their feet. “fell to my knees.” “needed a soft place to fall.” “pushed out a door at 30000 feet and free-falling.” listening to stories of loss, hentz (2002) sensed a “…physical knowing of the experience that was nonrational (sic) and noncognitive (sic)” (p. 162), suggesting that perception includes both the mind and the body. “perception and knowing occur through the body’s sensing the experience” (p. 164). the parents were experiencing grief through their bodies. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 5 moving forward as time passed, while the parents could move forward, they experienced an isolating and desolate struggle. “i was up and she was not, and vice versa.” “i was restless and had to keep moving.” “what are we moving on to?” there was a struggle with everyday life and how to live within their lives again. unique approaches helped each different individual: breathing the fresh air, taking comfort in going to mass, starting to listen. the slow path towards recovery was infused with physical sensations, moving towards a different place. hentz (2002) described, “…body memory…” (p.165) as a unique expression, a pattern of feeling where the person has the same sensation, relived as it was originally experienced. the women described hearing a song, coming into the season or day of the loss, seeing a phone number, all memories of the person but they also described the physical sensation associated with the memory (hentz, 2002). it was a physical connection to the earlier experiences, a body memory. beginning to ascend, together at different times, and in different ways, the parents described the physical sensation of being uplifted, of moving upward. parents used words connecting themselves with others. the words were positive and hopeful, suggesting a break from their desolation and loneliness. “joining hands and raising our arms and seeing the stars.” “starting to just listen more.” “we are ascending to the idea that we are not stopping here.” hentz noted that through listening to their bodies, the women in her study recognized the process of mourning and the cyclic pattern of time. “knowing the time was as the body perceived the time...the body just knew” (p. 169). “each experienced a process that had its own time and progression that could not be controlled through will or conscious awareness” (p. 169). without describing the physical toll grief has on a person, the parents all expressed their grief as a visceral, physical experience through the passage of time. free falling, moving forward, and beginning to ascend, together. cultivating spaces to nurture and nourish grieving – elizabeth keys the parents in this video spoke of finding unique spaces along their continuum of grief experiences. these spaces could be different physical locations in which to experience their grief, moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 6 a relational space in which to share grief, or a mental space in which new ideas and beliefs were cultivated. one couple contrasted their experiences of the physical spaces of which they sought. shortly after receiving the news of the death of their child, the mother settled on a single space – her child’s bed, while the father spoke of being restless and “pacing,” seemingly searching through multiple places for some elusive place where he could settle. another example of a physical space that seemingly nourished a mother’s grief was being outside, at the farm with the fresh air. relational spaces seemed to hold significance for the ability to nurture these parents’ grief. one of the fathers spoke of making space to experience grief differently than his wife, as a mother, would. for him, the relational space between a father and child held significance for opening up a unique space for grief. another father spoke of his wish that other people in the family’s life would join them in a relational space for grieving, rather than avoid it. one couple spoke of the ups and downs they would experience relating to one another’s grief, often not being in sync with each other’s struggles and occupying different emotional and mental spaces. these parents’ experiences seemed to allow the couple a chance to lean on one another and offer strength when their partner needed it most. other times, a partner may be so far away in a different mental or emotional space that the other would only be able to wait for the low to pass, until they were once again within arm’s reach to grasp on to, if only for a brief moment, and move on to exchange spaces. reordered worlds – alexandra robinson it was only a few weeks ago that i attended my father’s funeral. although it was, and is, hard to accept that we will not have his physical presence with us any longer, his funeral was a celebration of a life well lived. this is how it should be-it is the natural order of things. when parents lose a child, the order of life is abruptly disrupted and the bereaved parents are left to navigate a universe that seems to be governed by anarchy. one of the mothers described that upon learning of her daughter’s death, she felt like she “went into the twilight zone.” “you’re in shock, you don’t want to believe it.” you can’t run, there is nowhere to go, no place to hide from the storms of sorrow that have become the climate of this universe, this twilight zone. “you just can’t hide it.” and how could she hide with a “neon sign on her saying, ‘this person is in pain’ ”? “running away does not help, you need a safe haven, a soft place to fall.” what kind of universe is this that does not respect the correct order of life and death itself and then has the audacity to prescribe how to grieve and in what order? “each of us grieves differently, there is not a schedule, you can’t plan it, and you can’t fix it.” who are these people that give advice instead of comfort? they give advice like “you need to accept this or you need to get on with things…and we’re thinking, we don’t know that we want to get on with life…to say to accept it and move on is very cruel.” for him, it was a couple of months later, all alone on his farm when he finally wept for his daughter, wanting to feel the depth of his loss. he gave himself permission to grieve for as long as he wanted to. he welcomed that moment. they eventually surrendered to the new order of their world, a world where they outlived their children. shouting back with tears of remembrance, with rituals of remembrance, comforting one another, and celebrating the life that they shared together. celebrating her life was “the best thing we could have ever done for jodi, for the family, everybody was brought to the next level of moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 7 healing and we continue.” we accept that our world is forever changed and we will never be the same. “let this pain be our teacher.” having experienced the loss of their child, they have a better understanding of what life is all about. one father said he gained a new appreciation for young people. another said that he realized that he still had much to learn that his son already knew and understood and “ my son is helping me along the way.” another father reflected that they take comfort in appreciating that in the end, their daughter’s life was a picture of love and so “who am i to question?” the twilight zone of grief – gelenn carrera “knowing that you have lost a child is like going into the twilight zone” losing a child takes one to an area where nothing is certain anymore. the normal order of things would be for parents to die before children, but when the reverse happens, it takes away the normalcy of things. it makes one wonder if things will ever be normal again. life goes on, however, and for many parents who have lost a child, facing the realities of life without the child they have lost becomes the new normal. the unanswered question of closure – anila virani grief leaves us with unanswered questions. one of the unanswered questions is about closure. will these parents in the video ever get a closure or will they struggle till the day they die to get closure? finding meaning, seeing oneself as a better person after experiencing child’s death and celebrating the deceased child’s birthday, felt like examples of struggles, struggles to get closure. one parent in the video said she felt relieved and at peace after celebrating her deceased child’s birthday. one might argue that having family and friends over and remembering the memories of her child facilitates closure. however, is it really closure and is closure ever possible? one parent said moving on and getting on with life might bring a closure but struggled with what moving on would look like. one parent said if she had an explanation of why it happened from her deceased child who died by suicide (a letter or a note), she would have been better able to cope or may get closure. the oxford dictionary definitions for closure include: a feeling of finality or resolution, especially after a traumatic experience; a sense of resolution or conclusion; a thing that closes or seals something; an act or process of closing something. the word closure is form old french closure means fence or a barrier. in latin, clausura, from claus'closed', from the verb claudere means sense of "act of closing, bringing to a close." in legislation, closure means "closing or stopping of debate.” in gestalt psychology, it means a "tendency to create ordered and satisfying wholes." the parents in this video invited me to think that closure is about coming to terms with what happened. any act such as celebrating birthday or volunteering at youth camp that facilitates acceptance of what happened may bring closure and end the constant struggle struggle to deal with emotions, struggle to find a closure, struggle to disclose it to people, struggle to not to show moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 8 their pain. one parent said he used to believe that if you do good deeds in life, life will be without struggle but he realized he was wrong. we are meant to struggle. we are not meant to live without struggle. perhaps we are not ever to have closure over such an event and perhaps we do not even want it; we want to remember and stay connected. perhaps this is one of the lessons of grief. the gravity of grief – nancy j. moules “sorrow wears itself a hollow,” wallace (1985) tells us. their faces, lined with the hollow of loss, and wanting – of hearts broken, and presences missed – bear thin witnesses to the depth of sorrow carved out in their lives. david said it was like “freefalling without a parachute” and that he… had a clear answer…for the first time i wasn’t responsible for anyone else…i fell to my knees and felt the grief on me…and as odd as it sounds, i welcomed that moment cause i wanted to know in my soul and my heart that i had wept for my daughter. jody’s dad’s face welcoming the weight of grief called out other stories to me. “she would have been 12 this year,” a mother once spoke to me of her daughter who died at 6 years of age. and the mother who showed me the empty bird’s nest outside the window the day her 4-year-old son died. she spoke to me in a language i did not know and one i never hope to learn of her worry for the mother bird. she showed me the empty nest and broken heart of a mother. it calls out the story of my own son who lives under the damocles sword of heart disease. how does a parent learn to live a life of hollows and the gravity pull of grief? do we perhaps in encountering this unimaginable event learn that there are moments of hollows and gravitational pull, and there are moments of grace and love? and the next morning, i felt…love. i hadn’t felt love up until then. i’d only felt so much pain, but i felt love. through her tears and sorrow, debbie felt love. oh, “this gentleness we learn from what we can’t heal” (wallace, 1985, pp. 76-77). discussion this interpretive exercise in a doctoral level research class on qualitative research methods demonstrates the reflective capacity of “good data.” this is not about aggregate knowledge, moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 9 developing theories, looking for repetition to authenticate themes, or semantic coding. it is about these parents in these experiences and what they have to teach us, and others, about what it might be like to be a parent whose child dies. they do not answer that question “once and for all” there will always be other parents who unfortunately will experience the loss of a child and who will have their own experiences. good data in hermeneutic work are that which shed light on the topic and moves understanding along; it is not concerned with explanation but understanding (moules et al., 2015). good data invites reflection, the ability to think and write deeply on something that strikes us, rings true for us, or speaks to us (moules et al., 2015). this film in all of its pain and rawness is evocative and powerful. it is personal. i have been asked in the past why i use such a painful film for this exercise and my answer is simple. it is good. when we engage in qualitative research in applied disciplines (nursing, psychology, education, social work, etc.), the stories we invite and listen to are not always easy stories to tell or to hear. dr. john caputo in his foreword in the recently published book by moules et al. (2015) made the comment. …there is no theory, no body of principles, no rulebook, no set of universal norms that would enable us to “conduct” the interview recorded for us in chapter six with parents who have lost a child to cancer. the situation is steeped in an impenetrable mystery, a question to which there is no answer – why do children die? …the interviewer eases into the delicacy of a situation of unimaginable pain with “questions” that do no interrogate or objectify but create a space in which an unbearable suffering, an unspeakable pain, may find words. the words exchanged are gentle, sometimes hardly articulate, words that do not propose or defend thesis, words from the heart, from broken hearts. (caputo, in moules et al., 2015, p. xi) like interviews in our work, we have to be able to listen deeply and responsively (moules et al., 2015) to the data that come to meet us. we have to suffer it. we have to have the courage to hear such rawness and react and then respond to it. experience has something to teach us. these parents in the video, debbie and dave, chris and bill, mj and john, had the courage to speak to the unspeakable and unimaginable suffering of having a child die. they have and continue to teach us all. references 1 note: the film is called out of order: dealing with the death of a child ©, produced by calgary health services grief support program and the university of calgary. calgary, ab, canada. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzameaq7fni caputo, j.d. (2015). foreword: the wisdom of hermeneutics. in n.j. moules, g. mccaffrey, j.c. field, & c.m. laing, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 10 gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev.ed.; j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. hentz, p. (2002). the body remembers: grieving and a circle of time. qualitative health research, 12, 161-172. moules, n.j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes. an ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods 1(3), 1-21. moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. wallace, b. (1985). what it comes to mean. in b. wallace, common magic (pp. 76-77). ottawa, on, canada: oberon. microsoft word pelechcorrectedproof.docx corresponding author: sharon pelech doctoral candidate, university of calgary assistant professor, memorial university email: spelech@mun.ca journal of applied hermeneutics march 8, 2013 the author(s) 2013 teaching science as a hermeneutic event sharon pelech abstract in this article, the author explores the need for science education to be taught as a hermeneutic event, as opposed to a book of facts to be memorized. the fragmented, passive transmission of facts does not allow students to have a clear understanding of science, its’ traditions and how science lives in the world. reconnecting biology back into the world, and recognizing its creativity and uncertainty, will help students understand how science impacts their lives and the world. the author explores how, through hermeneutics, students can experience the living discipline of science, as opposed to learning about science. keywords curriculum studies, hermeneutics, high school biology, learning, philosophy of education, science education upon returning from their immersion week, the first year pre-service teachers in my secondary science curriculum course were excited to talk about their teaching experience, what went well, as well as some of the surprises and learning opportunities that arose for them. after 15 minutes of discussion, megan (pseudonym) spoke up and said “i asked my partner teacher whether i could talk to the biology students about the recent earthquake and tsunami in japan (that happened only days earlier). the teacher responded, ‘no, that is not biologically relevant; it is not in the curriculum.’” the class of pre-service teachers gasped and then a stunned silence settled onto the classroom. there was something in this incident that we knew did not feel right; the living discipline of biology that has been entrusted to us as teachers was not being honored (jardine, 2006). if we simply look at a few of the pictures displayed by the news stations from the japan disaster, we can easily see that pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 2 events such as this that address us are the reason why we teach biology, so that we can understand and be part of the world in which we live. an investigation of the alberta program of studies demonstrated direct links to the skills, attitudes, and content found within the mandated curriculum. instead, megan gave her notes on the respiration system and then a set of questions from the textbook, while the opportunity to root what we know about biology in the world was left behind. yet, at the same time as an experienced biology teacher, i could understand the response of that teacher. in a highly pressured world of heavy curricula, student/parent expectations, and the ever-present standardized test, this response was familiar to me. this moment made me wonder what makes it so that a teacher would feel necessary to respond this way. what is this saying to us about how science is seen in the school? “hermeneutics suggests that these striking incidents make a claim on us and open up and reveal something to us about our lives together and what it is that is going on, often unvoiced, in the ever-so commonplace and day-to-day act of being and being a teacher.” (jardine, 2006, p. 280). in this paper, i explore how science is commonly presented in schools and the impact this has on students in terms of their immediate understanding of science as a subject and, even more importantly, how this way of teaching ignores the urgent need to recognize that school science is perpetuating the conditions that contribute to the current ecological crisis. pretending that there is no ecological crisis is ignoring the inevitable where earth as a system will no longer be able to sustain life. orr (2004) argued that we are educating students as if there is no planetary emergency, or as if environmental problems will be solved by technology. taking science up as a hermeneutic experience can offer the opportunity to explore the complexity and interconnectedness of science with the world and allow student questions to be an opening to new understanding. hermeneutics recognizes that all understanding, including scientific, is “historical, linguistic and dialectical” (palmer, 1969, p. 212). through participation in the experience of science being a hermeneutic event, students may begin to be able to take up science as something more than “deadly dull information that [they] must consume” (jardine, 2003, p. xiv) and begin to understand science connected in its ancestry, traditions, interdependence, conflicts, ethics, and belonging in the world (jardine, 2003). common image of school science according to a study completed by aikenhead (2003), one of the key concerns regarding traditional science teaching is the “dishonest and mythical images about science and scientists it conveys” (p. 12). scientists are often presented as being objective and science and its methods provide absolute proof (mccomas, 1998). what is often lost with this vision is the tentativeness and creativity which are both key components of the process of science. one of the main culprits of this vision is the way laboratories and the scientific method is presented in science classes. in most science textbooks, a linear, lock-step, approach to the scientific method is provided that implies that all scientists follow a common series of steps to do research (mccomas, 1998). many students, in fact, are disappointed when they learn that scientists do not have a framed copy of the scientific method posted above their workbench (mccomas, 1998). the scientific method is presented in classrooms as predetermined, tidy, linear activities students must follow, and then write up to hand in for assessment. there is no imagination, creativity, or opportunities for discovering new ways of pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 3 understanding a concept. instead, students go away with an image of science that does not bear any relation to the lived world of science (blades, 2001). through a comparative analysis of three research projects conducted in england, sweden, and australia, lyons (2006) found that science students held three common views of science education. the first view is that science pedagogy is simply passive transmission of facts from teachers or textbooks to students. the second vision is that the content is irrelevant and boring. dewey described this in his article, child and the curriculum, in 1902. when science is presented as facts without any connection to students lives, it condemns the fact to be a hieroglyph… the most scientific matter loses this quality when presented in external ready-made fashion those things that are most significant to the scientific man, logic of actual inquiry… drop out. (p. 202) the third vision of science education that students commonly hold is that science is a difficult subject. this is not because the students found science intellectually stimulating, instead they described how science is full of terminology and, more importantly, that difficulties arise from the passive learning, memorization of facts, and the irrelevance of the content. lyons (2006) saw these common views as the primary reasons why students are disengaged in science, which has led to a dramatic decrease in enrolment into scientific fields throughout the western world. school science does not engage students in the living field of science as long as the curriculum remains content-driven and pedagogy is driven by standardized testing. blades (2001) described how, as a result of heavy amounts of content-laden curricula and a focus on testing, students’ questions are not allowed to be part of the process of learning science, that the only questions are the ones that are already provided by the teacher. capra (1996) argued that as long as we see information as something that is “lying out there to be picked up by the brain,” that we will miss the “whole network of relationships, a context, in which it is embedded and which gives it meaning” (p. 272). capra’s argument requires a break from the traditions of science education in which science classes are deeply entrenched. hermeneutics offers ways to connect science back to its field of knowledge by allowing students to become part of the conversations, traditions, and complexities of science as an event in understanding the world. [hermeneutics] provides a way to rethink what we experience in our day to day lives as teachers, what we understand teaching to be, … what we understand knowledge and tradition and language and conversation and … the methods of the sciences to be. (jardine, 2006, p. 269) a shift to hermeneutics by focusing on the ontology of teaching science, hermeneutics asks: how does science live in the world as an ongoing emerging discourse, and what traditions are a part of science education? furthermore, hermeneutics asks what does this conversation demand of me in regards to how i take up teaching science? “understanding is to be thought of less as a subjective act than as a participating in an event of tradition, a process of transmission in which past and present are constantly mediated” (gadamer, 2004, p. 291, original italics). understanding is both the goal and the path, so while scipelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 4 ence education often wishes to come up with a final, complete understanding, hermeneutics allows recognition that the process of understanding is never complete. the question then becomes: how do i proceed pedagogically when i understand that science education is not a thing with a final and definitive definition, but always in the process of becoming (smith, 1991)? in many current biology classes, information is given to students, and a predetermined set of questions are asked with predictable, predetermined answers expected. science is often mischaracterized as the application of techniques or calculation methods disconnected from the traditions from which they have come (crease, 1997). finding ways to bring these concepts back into the world, which includes their ancestry, memories that they evoke, and what truths they say about the world is essential to begin to understand the complexity behind why students seem disengaged in science. how can students connect with ideas that are unconnected to the world in which they belong? this is where hermeneutics can speak profoundly to science, by helping to find ways to root these scientific concepts back to the habitat from which they are part of, into what heidegger would call “being in the world” (as cited in kozoll & osborne, 2004, p. 158). being immersed in science as a living field means problems are to be understood more deeply, allowing a spontaneous and yet informed response to a question so that the knowledge can be used to respond to a question in a new and unanticipated way. by exploring in depth the many questions that emerged from the tragedy in japan, biology as a living discipline would open up possibilities and students would be able to see why this information is important and how it lives in the world. hermeneutics frames the possibility of teaching science as a dialectical perspective, where science is treated more as breaking open of questions (gadamer, 2004), as opposed to closing down the conversations by presenting science as a “celebration of closure... and of the end of interpretation” (donnelly, 2002, p. 147). the term bildung has a variety of meanings which imply formation, cultivation, and education (davey, 2006). bildung stresses that hermeneutic understanding does not find the end to a topic, but allows for a deepening of the experience which opens up the possibility for more questions and more demanding experiences. it is within this process where the rigour of the facts and information are required and are able to show how they belong in the world (davey, 2006). hermeneutics can replant the teaching of science back into the world in which the students and science as a field of knowledge are a part. it can help students explore how science presents a particular truth about the world and how they can explore the “perils and challenges of a materialistic account of the world” (donnelly, 2002, p. 149). accordingly, students can recognize how science lives as part of the world, and that it is not simply “storage of knowledge as is accomplished in a dictionary, a catalogue, etc.” (gadamer, 1992, p. 44). the historical, political and sociological aspects are all rooted within science itself, not as something separate to the body of knowledge that is considered science. with this, there is an opening and uncovering of "the ruling preconceptions of the moment [that] uncover new avenues of inquiry and thus indirectly be of service to the work of methodology" (gadamer, 1988, p. 289). hermeneutics also provides an opportunity to recognize “the inner interwoveness of one field of research with another” (gadamer, 1992, p. 45), which allows students to see how science as a field of knowledge is connected to the world and pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 5 invites students to become part of the conversation of science. “the history of mathematics or of the natural sciences is also a part of the history of the human spirit and reflects its destinies” (gadamer, 2004, p. 284). science and the students are both rooted within the same world, which means that science education becomes an opportunity for students to take part of the conversation as well as part of the understanding that is always already ongoing (gadamer, 2004). in my current doctoral research, which explores the question “what does it mean to teach biology well,” i interviewed both teachers and students to explore their experience of high school biology using a hermeneutic framework. one of the questions i asked both teachers and students was: “if teaching biology is mainly about memorizing facts then is teaching biology becoming redundant in the age of instant information through googling? what is the role of biology classrooms?” the responses from both students and teachers indicated that, in a good science class, there was something more happening than just amassing knowledge. there was the connection between ideas and theories and their lives that helped them understand the world of biology. they described how biology became a narrative that helped understand appreciate the complexities of the world. at the 2011 national science teachers association conference in san francisco, keynote speaker astrophysicist dr. jeff goldstein, director of the national centre for earth and space science in washington, dc, described how science taught as a “book of knowledge” did not do it justice, and in fact, was allowing the inheritance of science to be lost. instead, he argued that in order to continue the legacy of science exploration, we need creative imaginative people who wonder about the world. science teachers have to teach not only what we know about our world, but more importantly, how we have come to know it. the journey is where the science lives, and not in the isolated facts that have resulted from the journey. we need to understand where we came from and explore how each generation has added to the book of knowledge, which can then be passed onto the next generation. (re)visiting the biology classroom if we return to the classroom with the young student teacher but this time she was allowed to go ahead and talk to the students about the tsunami in japan, what would a classroom that takes up science hermeneutically look like? jardine (2003) asked us to recognize that the living discipline of biology goes beyond “fixed and finished givens that are beyond question and simply indoctrinate the young into such acceptance” and instead take up the discipline as “not fixed and finished but is rather, ongoing, still ‘in play’, still ‘open to question’ in our human inheritance” (p. 85). one way this could have been experienced is if megan had taken a picture on the internet of the tsunami as it hit japan and displayed it to the students, questions about the impact that this would have on the biological systems could emerge. for example, one picture shows an agricultural field, carefully manicured, with straight, well organized rows of crops growing beside large covered cultivated crops. the top half of the picture shows a black thick sludge of water filled with houses, vehicles and other debris sweeping over and swallowing the pristine fields. allowing the students to begin to ask questions about that one picture would open up the opportunity to understand the impact of that one moment of the tsunami on the ecosystems of japan. in many science classes, student questions are seen as a disruption. in a classroom where science was taken up hermeneutically pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 6 the questions would come to life and become a part of the discipline of science. as these questions emerge, the teacher’s role would be to pay attention to which questions were meaningful and rich to explore, and through this process, introduce the students to the field of biology emerging from their questions and their understanding of the world. often child-centered inquiry projects become shallow when a topic is given. students are asked select something that they are interested in and to go off on their own, research, and return to share this information. the students are fragmented into their own area of interests and often their inquiry remains superficial. to take up the topic hermeneutically, the focus has to be topiccentered, where students can take up the topic in multiple ways in order to understand the topic. the topic demands that the students and teacher pay attention to the discipline of biology it demands an academic rigour in order to understand and contribute to the ongoing conversation that this event calls up. as the questions surrounding the impact of the tsunami emerge from this one picture and as the teacher and the students explore the topic, it allows them to become part of the discipline of biology that is always already in the world, as a result the curriculum outcomes become re-rooted into the world in which they live. for example, the biology 20 alberta program of studies (2009) knowledge outcomes include biogeochemical cycles, ecosystems, and population change and equilibrium as a few examples that need to be understood in order to make sense of what is happening in japan as a result of the tsunami. a teacher who is open to allowing ambiguity, messiness, and complexity to live within the classroom, as opposed to being focused on finality and finding definitive answers would allow student questions to find a voice and a life in the discipline of science. as caputo (1987) reminded us, hermeneutics “does not lead us back to safe shores and terra firma; it leaves us twisting slowly in the wind” (p. 36) this is rooted in the complexity of where biology lives in the world. if students’ questions lead to the resulting nuclear plant destruction, the part of the program of studies (2009) that asks students to understand that “science and technology have both intended and unintended consequences for humans and the environment” has meaning and context from which to take up this understanding. questions on how we could come to the point where a nuclear power plant would be built on a major fault line in a country that experienced the bombing of hiroshima would emerge as part of the greater understanding of science. the connection of the curriculum to the world would, out of necessity, allow the students to: experience, to suffer, to endure, or undergo the arrival of an unfixed future and the questions it might hold, questions we might not have even imagined or desired. this open, living endurance, we suggest, is basic to the disciplines taught in schools. (jardine, 2003, p. 85) students would have the opportunity to realize that “even in the arena of making sense of the natural world, science is a limited discourse” (blades, 2001, p. 86). conclusion gadamer argued that the disciplines that we have been given responsibility for “live in their openness to being handed along” (jardine, 2006, p. 85) and are still open to questions, not only as part of our inheritance pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 7 but also where new understanding and learning emerges. clifford and friesen (2003) argued that “far too little of what most students do in school engages their imagination, fuels their passion to learn, connects them deeply with the world, or wins their hearts and minds” (p. 93). the work our students do is “memorizable… but it is rarely especially memorable” (jardine, 2006, p. 87). the implications of this goes beyond the classroom and trying to increase engagement which, although important, is only one piece of the interconnections that need to be explored as a teacher and a researcher. looking at the ecological implications of students being immersed in the discipline of science also helps the students to experience the interconnectedness of the world, so that they learn not about the earth but how they are part of the earth. capra (1996) wrote that the major world crises of our time are interconnected and interdependent, and recognizing that we cannot study these issues in isolation is essential. education is part of the perpetuation that allows the individualization and progress to be the primary discourse of the “developed” world. education, as it stands today, helps equip people to be more “effective vandals of the earth” (orr, 2004 p. 6). the tsunami disaster in japan is not just an interesting topic to help students become engaged in science, instead it demands that we bring forth the world of science and the understanding that emerges to help make sense of what is happening and where to go from here. this means that the topic demands the academic rigour and clarity that we, as science teachers, want the students to be able to leave the class with which includes not only the content, but the skills and attitudes that are part of the alberta program of studies. clifford and friesen (2006) asked, “what can happen in schools when teachers take seriously the power and the right of children to name and to shape their experience of the world?” (p. 94) what would have happened if that student teacher had the opportunity to explore the biological issues that the tsunami has brought forth? hopefully, some students would have understood why biology is an essential discipline in order to live well in this world what gadamer (1996) calls “being in the world as a wakeful presence” (p. 74). references aikenhead, g. s. (2003). review of research on humanistic perspectives in science curricula. paper presented at the european science education research association, noordwijkerhout, the netherlands. http://www.usask.ca/education/people/aiken head/esera_2.pdf alberta education (2009). biology 20/30 program of studies. edmonton, ab, canada: alberta education. blades, d.w. (2001). the simulacra of science education. in j.a. weaver, m. morris, & p. appelbaum (eds.), (post)modern science (education): propositions and alternative paths (pp. 57-94). new york, ny: peter lang. capra, f. (1996). the web of life: a new scientific understanding of living systems. new york, ny: anchor books. caputo, j.d. (1987). radical hermeneutics. bloomington & indianapolis, in: indiana university press. crease, r. p. (1997). hermeneutics and the natural sciences: introduction. man and world, 30, 259-270. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 8 new york, ny: state university of new york. dewey, j. (1902). the child and the curriculum. chicago il: the university of chicago press. donnelly, j. (2002). instrumentality, hermeneutics and the place of science in the school curriculum. science & education, 11, 135153. friesen, s., & clifford, p. (2003). hard fun: teaching and learning for the twenty-first century. in d. jardine, s. friesen, & p. clifford, back to the basics of teaching and learning: thinking the world together (pp. 89-107). mahwah, nj: lawrence erlbaum. gadamer, h.g. (1988). rhetoric, hermeneutics, and the critique of ideology. in k. mueller-vollmer (ed.), the hermeneutics reader (pp. 274-292). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h.g. (1992). the university of heidelberg and the birth of modern science (l. schmidt & m. reuss, trans.). in d. misgeld & g. nicholson (eds.), hansgeorg gadamer on education, poetry, and history. albany, ny: state university of new york press. gadamer, h.g. (1996). the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age. palo alto, ca: stanford university press. gadamer, h.g. (2004). truth and method (j. w. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans., 2nd ed.). new york, ny: continuum. goldstein, j. (2011, march). it’s not a book of knowledge…it’s a journey. keynote presentation conducted at the national science teachers association conference, san francisco, california. jardine, d. (2006). on hermeneutics: “what happens to us over and above our wanting and doing.” in k. tobin & j. kincheloe (eds.), doing educational research: a handbook (pp. 269-289). amsterdam, the netherlands: sense. kozoll, r. h., & osborne, m. d. (2004). finding meaning in science: lifeworld, identity, and self. science education, 88(2), 157-181. lyons, t. (2006). different countries, same science classes: students' experiences of school science in their own words. international journal of science education, 28(6), 591-613. mccomas, w. f. (1998). the principal elements of the nature of science: dispelling the myths. in w. f. mccomas (ed.), the nature of science in science education (pp. 53-70). dordrecht, the netherlands: kluwer academic publishers. orr, d.w. (2004). earth in mind: on education, environment, and the human prospect. washington, dc: 96island press. smith, d. g. (1991). hermeneutic inquiry: the hermeneutic imagination and the pedagogic text. in e. c. short (ed.), forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 187-209). albany, ny: state university of new york press. microsoft word jardineproof2.docx corresponding author: david w. jardine faculty of education, university of calgary, calgary, ab t2n 1n4 email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 12, 2012 the author(s) 2012 “the memories of childhood have no order and no end”: pedagogical reflections on the occasion of the release, on october 9th 2009, of the re-mastered version of the beatles’ sergeant pepper’s lonely hearts club band. david w. jardine “the memories of childhood have no order, and no end.” from dylan thomas’s (1954, p. 8) reminiscences of childhood we are no longer able to approach this like an object of knowledge, grasping, measuring and controlling. rather than meeting us in our world, it is much more a world into which we ourselves are drawn. [it] possesses its own worldliness and, thus, the center of its own being so long as it is not placed into the objectworld of producing and marketing. the being of this thing cannot be accessed by objectively measuring and estimating; rather, the totality of a lived context has entered into and is present in the thing. and we belong to it as well. our orientation to it is always something like our orientation to an inheritance that this thing belongs to, be it from a stranger’s life or from our own. from hans-georg gadamer (1994, p. 192), heidegger’s ways. reminiscence i all this is certainly more than twenty years ago today. grade 11 english class, winter 1967, some time after february 2, 1967. i’m mentioning this because i still remember that date, february 2, 1967, was when i first heard the latest beatles single, penny lane/strawberry fields forever, over an american am radio station that crackled its way to southern ontario, to burlington, one evening whose details are lost to memory. was it wbz from boston? and how we stood in doug’s rec-room, amazed, wondering whether we were actually hearing what we thought, or whether the radio was blurring in and out of the winter snowstatic, like old tv reception. good vibrations the previous fall of ’66 was strange enough. now this? what is this? part of it was the vertigo tremble of being near-17 in oh-so-fortunate days such as those and sensing all around secret and hidden worlds impending. glimmer of a sort of aufklarung with its double german roots of “enlightenment” and also “clearing up.” some lit cracks “break forth” (gadamer 1989, p. 458) in those clouds of winter static. openings. opportunity. possibilities, and “thereby possible ways of shaping our lives” (gadamer, 1986, p. 59). there. “through the recess, the chalk and numbers” (wilson & parks 1966). something secret. (“yo-da-lay-ee-who,” jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 2 sung right over that song-line). sometime in late-february that year, in our grade 11 english class, we were given reminiscences of childhood by dylan thomas to read with the horrifying and boring prospect of discussing it in the days to come. (school not yet ever experienced as a place of schola: “leisure,” and a place of "a holding back, a keeping clear” [oed]). unexpected, then, in reading this for school, this happens. i seem to already know intimately of this place of reminiscence. i “recognize [myself] in the mess of th[is] world” (hillman 1983, p. 49). how did this welshman know this of me? was i spotted unawares when i was lingering there? (aufklarung is not simply becoming conscious of threads in the world, but becoming, in all its myriad, self-conscious—not just spotting but being spotted, and spotting that, experiencing that i am experienced by others, that i am visible). dylan thomas has experienced me and now seems to write down heretofore secret trails of what i am. images of flying, in memory: over the trees of the everlasting park, where a brass band shakes the leaves and sends them showing down on to the nurses and the children, the cripples and the idlers, the gardeners and the shouting boys. (thomas, 1954, p. 8) and these specific streets, “inkerman street, sebastopol street” (p. 8), names whose very specificity made them both tangible and imaginable. nearby recesses. my self being formed right there, in front of me. like bankers, sitting, waiting, midst pictures of possible trims, straightrazor foamed clean-cut around the ears. and there, a “fireman turning off the hose and standing in the wet” (thomas, 1954a, p. 15) (safely rushed in from the pouring rain), from “a child’s christmas in wales” (which i quickly read next back then and not at all for school). very strange. nurses, imagined in memory with poppies in a tray in the park with old men and brass bands, my own old “dame school . . .so firm and kind smelling of galoshes, with the sweet and fumbled music of the piano lessons drifting down from upstairs to the lonely schoolroom” (thomas, 1954, p. 7). lakeshore public school, built in 1923, red brick, facing lake ontario, “the singing sea” (p. 8) where by grade six we’d smoke stolen cigarettes and meet at the water’s lap edge, a “world within the world [into which we are drawn]” (p. 4), “secret” (p. 4), housing “its own, even sacred, seriousness” (gadamer 1989, p. 102). “a space specially marked out and reserved” (gadamer, 1989, p. 107). “this is for us, not for the 'others'. what the 'others' do 'outside' is of no concern to us at the moment. we are different, we do things differently" (huizinga, 1955, p. 12): and a packet of cigarettes: you put one in your mouth and you stood at the corner of the street and you waited for hours, in vain, for an old lady to scold you for smoking [“a world wholly closed within itself, it is as if open toward the spectator in whom it achieves its whole significance” (gadamer, 1989, p. 109)]. (thomas, 1954a, p. 17) good heavens, there it is: “the wild boys innocent as strawberries” (1954, p. 6). what am i going to do with this secret? (“every game presents the [one] who plays it with a task” (gadamer, 1989, p. 107). jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 3 i ended up, of course, humming along in our grade 11 class as i read about hunchbacks and how “the boys made the tigers jump out of their eyes,” (thomas, 1954 p. 6) and “the smell of fish and chips on saturday evenings” (p. 7) (tethered later to even more dirty-secret beatle pies). and our teacher asking me about the humming song, and me telling him about penny lane and strawberry fields and how this reminiscence we were reading sounds so familiar, and him getting one of those purple smelly gestetner™ machine mimeograph sheets and telling me to take it home and type out the lyrics. and i did. and our teacher copied it out. and we looked there and then and long and hard into the deep face of the world that some of us were actually already secretly living in. ear whisper. remembered thus, our teacher to me: “you need to read more dylan thomas.” this is what he said in truth but it may not be what he actually said. i can’t quite remember but i remember it as clear as day, that invitation out of yet back into childhood sleepiness, out of and yet back into to play. and then. four months later, june 1 1967, a month to go before school is finally out, k. p. and i go into hamilton’s west end, kensington mall (a name worthy of wales or liverpool) to a record store, and buy sergeant pepper’s lonely hearts club band. not right away, but slowly, soon, there, some recognition, right above and between marlon brando and tom mix, themselves above the madame tussaud’s wax figures of the beatles reminisced from 1964. there. a round and unmistakable puffytousled face in black and white. there! dylan thomas. reminiscence ii we do not understand what recognition is in its profoundest nature if we only regard it as knowing something again that we know already i.e., what is familiar is recognized again. the joy of recognition is rather the joy of knowing more than is already familiar. in recognition what we know emerges, as if illuminated, from all the contingent and variable circumstances that condition it (gadamer, 1989, p. 114). the joy of recognition. the joy of knowing more. in blurry retrospect, this is the first time i remember having the experience of actually knowing something, of actually having read something “right” up out of my own according life. the pedagogy of this is important and almost intractable. “over and above our wanting and doing,” things sometimes “happen to us” (gadamer, 1989, p. xxviii). this, of course, is an insight long in coming and points to why i still remember this event, still call it to mind and make something of it, again and again, in such callings. “every repetition is as original as the work itself” (gadamer, 1989, p. 122). there are adventures in the world, secret places that will yield those secrets if i care to venture and do what the place requires of me when i arrive. our teacher seemingly “ignor[ing] the orthodox who labor so patiently trying to eliminate the apocryphal variants from the one true text. there is no one true version of which all the others are but copies or distortions. every version belongs” (thompson, 1981, pp. 11-12). a conspiracy, a common breath. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 4 it is as if i was, all those years ago, presented with a task that was wedded to a prospect, a promise, that settling here will bring unexpected yield, that staying here has a future (linked somehow to reminiscence, to a past’s future that is remarkably “standing” still “in a horizon of … still undecided future possibilities” [gadamer, 1989, p. 112]). still. this is how stillness anticipates. stillare “to drip, drop” (o.e.d.). every version belongs: “interweaving and crisscrossing" (wittgenstein, 1968, p. 36). undergoing an “increase in being” (gadamer, 1989, p. 40) in such interweaving. slowly becoming what it is. slowly become who i have become. crisscrossing. it would be a mistake for me to portray that june 1967 event simply as some thunderbolt flash of some sort of full illumination at the time in the mind and life of a 16 year old. i’ve since read of gadamer’s teacher, martin heidegger, and his oft-used image of lightning, where a territory gets suddenly illuminated and gathers into a place, a topos, a “topic” (see, e.g., caputo 1982, p. 195). this idea of an opening or clearing or field (see friesen & jardine, 2009) that suddenly opens up and illuminates, has long since haunted me. see, too, gadamer (1989, p. 21), on topica and the young needing images, like nurses selling poppies, for the formation of their memory. all this is of that reminiscence. slow emergence. flash and then slow glowing arrives, but only if i take on as my own the work of remembering. hermeneutics is a practice. an earthly sort of aufklarung. “you should read more dylan thomas” as a call to prayer, to practice, with a promise that something will yield through patience and “a continuity of attention and devotion” (berry, 1986, p 32). hermeneutics as an ecological practice. all the work i’ve come to do starts here, at this absent origin. after all, “understanding begins when something addresses us,” (gadamer, 1989, p. 299), but it only begins there. reading a child’s christmas in wales was compelled as a way to continue to remain in the same place and cultivate it a bit more, as is writing this paper, a gathering that is also a whiling (jardine, 2008), like the festive (gadamer, 1989, pp. 122-123) 09-09-09 release of the re-mastered sergeant pepper’s lonely hearts club band, its date echoing a white album yet to come back in early 1967. and, just to foolishly rub this wound, we are dealing with an event which itself was already about memory and reminiscence, in and of wales boyhoods, in and of liverpool streets and orphanages, in sound and shiny brass band accordances in edwardian suits, young men singing, in 1967, about being 64 (and how i’m now actually three years away!) and me, at that time, 16 going on 17, beginning to feel full-fledge the reminiscent pull of my own life, my own imagined childhood, now clearly ago, and slowly, slowly, drip-drop, becoming the sort of perhaps-never-was that i can henceforth live with remembering and recognizing thus. “to reconcile [my]self with [my]self, to recognize oneself in other being” (gadamer 1989, p. 13). it has taken years for that event to become what it was. read that again. it has taken years for that event to become what it was. what it is “what really happened back then in that english class or that ride to kensington mall?” becomes a more and more trivial question, because the question that drives here is “what has become of it?” even asking “what really happened?” is itself a formative act. this is how jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 5 memory works, because memory doesn’t just store information: it does work, and its workings are how it shapes the one remembering. this is why memory is always someone’s: whoever uses his memory as a mere faculty and any “technique” of memory is such a use does not yet possess it as something that is absolutely [one’s] own. memory must be formed; for memory is not memory of anything and everything. one has a memory for some things, and not for others; one wants to preserve one thing in memory and banish another. “keeping in mind” is ambiguous (gadamer, 1989, pp. 15-16). indeed it is. this ambiguity hides an oftensecreted mechanism of becoming myself right at the very moment when contingent and variable circumstances both fall away and gather up into illuminating recognition all at once. look there. wild boys, innocent. ambiguous, this keeping in mind. so, that “past” event’s eventfulness is recurrently experienced as “a task that is never entirely finished” (gadamer, 1989, p. 301). after all, here we are, writer and reader, 44 years on, still struggling with how and whether to learn to live with the entreaties of this event. “by forming the thing [i] form [my]self” (gadamer, 1989, p. 13), and by informing, now, in this writing, i set out for readers a gentle pedagogical demand on thinking, on memory formation and its ways. this: that “every word breaks forth” (gadamer, 1989, p. 458) thus. shush! this is the hermeneutic secret regarding pedagogy. every seeminglymoribund thread of every program of studies for every grade (and even grade 11 english class now 44 years ago) has secrets such as these, reminiscences to be had in the leisure of schooling. reminiscence iii spiel: origin: 1890–95; (noun) < german spiel or yiddish shpil play, game; (v.) < german spielen or yiddish shpiln to play, gamble. (www.dictionary.reference.com) and become in english parlance, in the great imac desktop dictionary definition: “a long or fast speech or story, typically intended as a means of persuasion or as an excuse but regarded with contempt or skepticism by those who hear it.” wild schoolboy ruses, then, little persuasions or excuses or deceits needed to make our way in the world down by lake-lap edge. but still, we secretly knew, i secretly knew that “something is going on, (im spiele ist), something is happening (sich abspielt)” (gadamer, 1989, p. 104). that’s why i ended up reading a child’s christmas in wales in short order back then, simply and only because the beatles fan in me seemed to have already read it. that, i expect (or, actually, hope in retrospect), is why our teacher ventured like he did. risking the wild that turned out to not only reveal but also revive a deep and hidden civility, an emergent culturedness (bildung) in that uprising that can save the world (of grade 11 english) from its too-often over-schooled moroseness. because the world is made by mortals it wears out; and because it continuously changes its inhabitants it runs the risk of becoming as mortal as they. to preserve the world against the mortality of its creators and inhabitants it must be constantly set right anew. the problem is simply to educate in such a way that a settingright remains actually possible, even though it can, of course, never be assured. our hope always hangs on the new which every generation brings. (arjardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 6 endt, 1969, p. 192) a triple rescue in this setting-right. thomas’s reminiscences of childhood is rescued from its moribund locale in the english grade 11 program of studies, that overloaded canon. it is awakened. beatles rescued from pop-culture momentariness. and me finding a place of comfort for my own awakening, finding my own strength strengthened, housed and cared for in the common embrace of these welsh and liverpool worlds. as i become myself, i also become unalone in this becoming. handed, and handed over to, an inheritance. both and always “in between” (gadamer, 1989, p. 109). all at once spotting and spotted. a great ecological convergence at the heart of coming to know. this, then, is the pedagogical task, working this out and thus working out a life. and in this working, preserving the world from the mortality of its creators and inhabitants while all that while becoming more and more mortal. “pathei mathos: learning through suffering” (gadamer, 1989, p. 356). reminiscence iv “something awakens our interest that is really what comes first!” (gadamer, 2001, p. 50). something awakens. something clears. aufklarung. the lane was always the place to tell your secrets; if you did not have any, you invented them. occasionally now i dream that i am turning out of school into the lane of confidences when i say to the boys of my class, “at last, i have a real secret.” “what is it what is it?” “i can fly.” and when they do no believe me, i flap my arms and slowly leave the ground only a few inches at first, then, gaining air until i fly waving my cap level with the upper windows of the school, peering in until the mistress at the piano screams and the metronome falls to the ground and stops, and there is no more time. (thomas, 1954, pp. 7-8) it is odd to have steeped meaning, wonderfully, both “soaked” and “softened” (o.e.d)-so long in this lane of confidences, these images, roiling back and forth in intimate relations of “responding and summoning” (gadamer, 1989, p. 458), of me being summoner and then summoned some, responding and feeling waves of resistance and response, memory and lapse, formative, shaping. glimpses of “the unsaid” (p. 458). you see, i could have sworn, starting this paper, that dylan thomas’ nurses in the park had poppies. they do not. and that there was an orphanage in wales, wasn’t there, like strawberry field in wild boy days in liverpool? no. thus i, too, have a secret. a new idea is never only a wind-fall, an apple to be eaten. it takes hold of us as much as we take hold of it. the hunch that breaks in pulls one into an identification with it. we feel gifted, inspired, upset, because the message is also a messenger that makes demands, calling us to . . .fly out. (hillman, 2005, p. 99) and when they do not believe me, i write my way down lanes of confidences. this is the secret. this reminiscent world is my first memory of a genuinely hermeneutic experience. such “experience has its proper fulfillment not in definitive jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 7 knowledge but in the openness to experience that is made possible by experience itself” (gadamer, 1989, p. 355). because i’ve dwelt in this territory for so many years, it has ripened such that i am now more susceptible to its summoning. “[this world] compels over and over, and the better one knows it, the more compelling it is. this is not a matter of mastering an area of study” (gadamer, 2007, p. 115) and yet it is something of ripe pedagogy at its best. something in me keeps expecting to see hans-georg gadamer’s face one day on that re-mastered record sleeve “record sleeve,” itself, of course, a reminiscence. a “have no end” the world, too, needs protection to keep it from being overrun and destroyed by the onslaught of the new that burst upon it with each new generation. (arendt, 1969, pp. 185-6) you all know that as a beginner one comes to find everything questionable, for that is the privilege of youth to seek everywhere the novel and new possibilities. one then learns slowly how a large amount must be excluded in order to finally arrive at the point where one finds the truly open questions and therefore the possibilities that exist. (gadamer, 1986, p. 59) “the memories of childhood have no order, and no end” (thomas, 1954, p. 8). but dylan thomas knew clearly of a secret order in the park, by the water’s lake lap, in the old woman’s scold. that ecological scold of wildness that comes in response to wild erupts, as simple, sometimes, as innocent boys humming tunes in school. or little children who laugh behind the backs of bankers. “to find free spaces and learn to move therein” (gadamer, 1986, p. 59). real possibilities that might just open up unseen unsaid worlds (“even though it can, of course, never be assured” [arendt, 1969, p. 192]). to re-cite: “and thereby possible ways of shaping our lives” (gadamer, 1986, p. 59), even though such shaping can never be assured. so, here’s to miraculous happenstance, the remembered ventures of a teacher, and the great lack of assurance that underwrites pedagogy at its best. i know that this age-old experience of being drawn into a world and finding myself already there is one that has been and remains a steadfast refuge and path of my own work, and a key to what i hope can happen in schools. here’s another small secret that isn’t much of a secret. it’s not just a hope. i’ve seen something of it happen in many dame schools, firm and kind. at least, that is what i remember through this recess of reminiscence. and when they do not believe me, i flap my arms and write out of the joy of recognition. the best news of all in this vague season is remembering such events and chancing to see their kin bubble up in kind in the lives of students and teachers. it has allowed me to still feel a bit of a wild boy, still somehow innocent as strawberries. bragg creek, alberta, december 21-31, 2011 jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 8 bio david w. jardine, phd, is a professor in the faculty of education, university of calgary. references arendt, h. (1969). between past and future: eight exercises in political thought. new york, ny: penguin books. caputo, j. (1982). heidegger and aquinas: an essay on overcoming metaphysics. new york, ny: fordham university press. friesen, s., & jardine, d. (2009). on field(ing) knowledge. in s. goodchild & b. sriraman (eds.), relatively and philosophically e[a]rnest: festschrifte in honour of paul ernest’s 65th birthday. the montana mathematics enthusiast: monograph series in mathematics education (pp. 149-175). charlotte, nc: information age publishing. gadamer, h. g. (1986). the idea of the university--yesterday, today, tomorrow. in d. misgeld & g. nicholson (eds. & trans.), hans-georg gadamer on education, poetry, and history: applied hermeneutics (pp. 47-62). albany, ny: suny press. gadamer, h. g. (1989). truth and method. new york: continuum books. gadamer, h. g. (1994). heidegger’s ways. boston: mit press. gadamer, h.g. (2007). from word to concept: the task of hermeneutics as philosophy. in r. palmer (ed. & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 108-122). evanston, il: northwestern university press. hillman, j. (1983). healing fiction. barrytown, n.y.: station hill press. hillman, j. (2005). notes on opportunism. in james hillman (2005), senex and puer (pp. 96-112). putnam, ct: spring publications. huizinga, j. (1955). homo ludens: a study of the play element in culture. boston, ma: the beacon press. jardine, d. (in press). on the while of things. forthcoming in d. jardine, pedagogy left in peace. new york, ny: continuum books. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 9 online etymological dictionary (o.e.d.). access december 26, 2011 at: http://www.etymonline.com. thomas, d. (1954). reminiscences of childhood. in d. thomas, quite early one morning. new york, ny: new directions paperbook, p. 3-8. thomas, d. (1954a). a child’s christmas in wales. in d. thomas (1954). quite early one morning (pp. 14-21). new york: new directions paperbook. thompson, w. i. (1981). the time falling bodies take to light: mythology, sexuality and the origin of culture. new york, ny: st. martin's press. wilson, b., & parks, v. d. (1966). wonderful. lyrics by v. d. parks, © warner/chappell music, inc., universal music publishing group. wittgenstein, l. (1968). philosophical investigations. cambridge, uk: blackwell’s. microsoft word mccaffrey moules corrected proof .docx 1 university of calgary, faculty of nursing corresponding author: graham mccaffrey, rn phd email: gpmccaff@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 2, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 encountering the great problems in the street: enacting hermeneutic philosophy as research in practice disciplines graham mccaffrey1, rn, phd & nancy j. moules1, rn, phd abstract in this paper, we speak to tenets of gadamerian hermeneutic philosophy that “guide” our hermeneutic inquiry in research that seeks to understand the complexity of human experiences. in our conduct of hermeneutic research, we grapple with “great problems” and encounter the human difficulty of topics such as childhood cancer, grief, mental illness, education and schools, arts and humanities, and other topics that show up in practice professions of nursing, teaching, social work, or psychology. keywords hermeneutic research, hermeneutic philosophy, hans-georg gadamer, nursing, qualitative research, applied hermeneutics of all actions, those performed for a purpose have been least understood, no doubt because they have always been counted the most understandable and are to our consciousness the most commonplace. the great problems are to be encountered in the street. (nietzsche, 1881/1982, p. 78) in 2015, dr. john caputo introduced us to a society hosted out of villanova university called the north american society for philosophical hermeneutics (nasph), a society interested in mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 2 philosophical hermeneutics in particular that of hans-georg gadamer. the focus of the 2015 10th annual meeting was “the future(s) of hermeneutics” and we decided to submit a paper offering our perspectives and approaches that involve applied hermeneutics. although the paper was not accepted for the meeting, one of the authors (moules) attended the meeting and was surprised to find that many members of the group were aware of, and very interested in, the work that is being done in this area and, in particular, being done by the work of the canadian hermeneutic institute (chi) and the journal of applied hermeneutics (jah). through taking up the task of articulating what “applied hermeneutics” in practice disciplines means to a new audience, we subsequently realized we had also written a reflective account of developments in applied hermeneutics since the founding of the chi in 2009. what follows is a version of that account, published for the fifth anniversary of jah in 2016. in the ways we have embraced hermeneutics in an applied sense, hermeneutics is not really concerned with itself as a philosophy but rather with how we make sense of philosophy in a way that is applied in living examples. like the mandate of this journal, we take up gadamerian hermeneutics in its application to topics that inhabit our lives and professions, interpreting living examples of being in the world. this is the act of philosophy and catching it in the act and action of human concerns (caputo, 2015; moules & mccaffrey, 2015). what is the basis for our claim of a fit between hermeneutics and a practice discipline like nursing? one answer to this question is that the type of questions we endeavor to answer – or perhaps we should say, to respond to – hermeneutically are invariably about relationships. what, for example, are the effects of childhood cancer irrupting into a family, on grandparents, on the parental couple, on romantic/intimate partners of adolescents with cancer, on adolescent sexuality? gadamerian hermeneutics in particular, with its insistence on the centrality of dialogue in opening up understanding, both echoes the topic of interest and the means of generating data by interview. none of this is to say that we have a naïve understanding that dialogue automatically or smoothly opens the door to understanding; we are interested in our research in the said and the unsaid, in elisions, silences, and contradictions; we are aware of the distortions introduced into the possibility of “genuine conversation” (gadamer, 2004, p. 385) by power differentials and the prescriptive goals of the research interview. hermeneutics allows us – requires us to regard relationships as complex, dynamic, contextual, and historical and, in doing so, helps us to avoid the twin traps of complacently seeking our own goodness or berating ourselves for falling short of idealized conceptions of ourselves as self-sacrificing nurses or teachers. this is to consider dialogue and relationship literally as interactions between persons and, at this literal level, we speak to nietzsche’s claim that “the great problems are to be encountered in the street” (1881/1982, p. 78) or in the classroom, the hospital, or the living room amongst everyday interactions in which something is at stake for individuals. hermeneutics also allows us – requires us – to regard these interactions in the fullness of their historical moment and matrices of cultural associations. one of the weaknesses of much research in nursing that claims to be hermeneutic is that it misses this point and resides too much in the personal, ignoring gadamer’s admonition that “the self awareness of the individual is only a flickering in the closed circuit of historical life” (2004, p. 278). in exploring the relationships between nurses and patients on mental health units, for example, the hegemony of biomedical psychiatry is played out in the significance accorded to mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 3 the role of nurses in giving medications to patients. it is a role that is taken very seriously, a moment in which the nurse simultaneously exercises power over the patient and is acted upon (carrying out medical orders) since she or he will be called to account for omissions or errors. by contrast, the level of participation in therapeutic conversations with patients is highly dependent on local unit cultures and is often more or less optional and only weakly connected to the goals and aspirations of patients. histories of subordination, supervision, confinement, as well as weaker traditions of the therapeutic potential of language are enacted in everyday rituals that privilege certain activities over others. relationship is often the locus of hermeneutic application to practice disciplines around specific questions or topics, but we would argue beyond this for a more intimate and deeper sense of application in the nature of practice disciplines as such. we will explore this in terms of nursing since that is our discipline, but we would expect that teachers, social workers, or psychologists could make equivalent arguments. in truth and method (1960/2004), gadamer used the law as an exemplar for hermeneutics as an applied philosophy law being a well established branch of the human sciences as well as a respectable, bürgerlich profession. in his long subsequent career, he elaborated upon his hermeneutic philosophy to many different audiences, including physicians and some of those lectures were collected in the english volume the enigma of health (1996). medicine has also been studied through a hermeneutic lens by fredrik svenaeus (2000) who argued that clinical medicine should be seen as a practice “which can be best understood as an interpretive meeting between health-care personnel and patient with the aim of healing the ill person seeking help” (p. 2). although here he used the ecumenical expression “health care personnel,” he makes it clear throughout the work that he is talking about medicine, and that other disciplines such as nursing are treated, somewhat apologetically, as approximate sub-types of medicine. the view of nursing as existing in relation to medicine, if acknowledged as a separate discipline at all, is important from a hermeneutic point of view. we are able to hear ourselves and to reflect upon the place from which we speak by understanding ourselves as nurses in relation to other professions, other disciplines and our own histories. nursing as a discipline within academia continues to hold a somewhat provisional place. the idea that registered nurses should have a degree level education is still relatively new and is not always the case in every jurisdiction. when one of the authors (mccaffrey) was studying for his doctorate in nursing, he often encountered surprise that there was such a phenomenon as a phd in nursing. a sense of ambiguity in relation to the status of nursing is not simply a problem of those on the outside. amongst ourselves, nurses cannot resist picking at a wound of self-identity; new classes of graduate students, arriving as confident clinical practitioners, find themselves thrown back into the existential anxiety of the question, “what is nursing?” one of the reasons for this uncertainty is that nursing has one foot firmly in the natural sciences and one just as firmly in – what shall we say, the human sciences, the humanities, the geisteswissenschaften? the interrelation between what we do and how we do it – so immediately apparent in every patient's story of an indifferent or a compassionate nurse – is a vortex at the heart of nursing. we offer as a provisional answer to the question “what is nursing?” an acceptance of the ambivalence and the uncertainty, of the “flux” to borrow caputo’s term. under the influence of hermeneutics, we have come to understand nursing as a dialogue with itself before it is actualized in the dialogue between nurse and patient. against the essentializing voices in nursing that would say it is ultimately a matter of technical mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 4 proficiency, or of individuals having a compassionate nature, we say that it is a dialogue that has no last word. nursing is a condition of interpretive instability, saturated with possibility and concomitant anxiety, in the moment that it is both academic discipline and practice profession. having arrived at this point, which feels very abstract, nursing always has to manifest in practice according to the telos of helping patients (these are placeholder terms: “helping” being the broadest and simplest term to encompass the multivariate activities of contemporary nursing and “patients” standing, according to context, for client or family or community or simply person). flux is not the same as meaninglessness, and nursing is a recognizable human activity with the stamp of responding to needs related to health and illness. nursing is an embodied and enacted social function that entails distinct, if widely varied, kinds of actions, prescriptive legal and ethical frameworks of permission and obligation, as well as more subtle codes of language and behaviour. one of gadamer’s concepts that speaks most naturally to nurses is his retrieval of phronesis, or practical wisdom. nursing done well demonstrates the exercise of judgment in the moment, drawing upon knowledge of various kinds, and applying it judiciously and helpfully according to the contours of the unique instance. one of the authors (mccaffrey) was teaching a class of undergraduate students who were working in clinical placements in long-term care centres. during a discussion of how ethics entered into the formation of judgment for nurses, one student brought up an incident that she had found troubling. a healthcare aide had brought a commode (toilet in a chair on wheels) to a resident and because she could not find the pot that fitted into the commode, she had used a garbage can for the resident to urinate into. the student felt discomfited by seeing this, thinking that although it met a functional purpose, there was a falling away of respect for the dignity of the resident in the failure to provide the proper equipment. she had responded by going to find the pot that was part of the commode and using it correctly. we have described this minor incident from practice deliberately because it is minor; phronesis, however, does not demand grandeur of scale, or life and death consequences. it does demand a refinement of sensibility, an acuity of perception that has to be practiced over and over, so that it is precisely in the capacity to practice in the smallest of cases that it is more likely to be practiced at all. these understandings of nursing and of other practice disciplines have not been achieved easily or quickly. we are not philosophers in the strict sense of the discipline. we are nurses and educators. however, we study and teach on gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, and we apply philosophical tenets to our teaching, discipline, and our research. in 2009, drs. nancy johnson, debbie mcleod, and nancy moules co-founded the canadian hermeneutic institute (www.chiannual.com) with the intent to bring together scholars of hermeneutics and hermeneutic research across disciplines in creative dialogue and conversations of philosophy, research, and practice. each year we gather with a visiting scholar of hermeneutics: drs. david jardine, john caputo, richard kearney, james olthuis, gail weiss, nicholas davey, and jean grondin to date. during these gatherings we have discovered that these renowned scholars were sometimes surprised to find that nurses, social workers, psychologists, administrators, and teachers were interested in hermeneutics and perhaps even more surprised to learn that we had for over two decades been conducting research guided by gadamerian hermeneutics. in these meetings, as we speak to our topics of concern and research, there is a sense of what caputo (2015) identified as mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 5 the “‘hermeneutic situation’ in the concrete, glowing white hot and jumping off the pages of the philosophy books” (p. xi). dr. richard kearney aptly named this “applied hermeneutics” and encouraged us in 2011 to launch a journal, the journal of applied hermeneutics, which now moves to its sixth year of publication. the work published in the journal ranges from philosophical papers to more practical interpretations of aspects of our disciplines that speak to human conditions of living. in 2014, we along with two colleagues received a book contract with peter lang publishing to write conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015). in the book, we speak to tenets of gadamerian philosophy that “guide” our approach to understanding the complexity of the human experience. we conduct research around topics such as childhood cancer, grief, mental illness, education and schools, arts and humanities, and other topics that show up in practice professions of nursing, teaching, social work, and psychology. in the discipline of nursing, we have been guided by gadamer’s work for over 20 years; the dissertations in nursing alone are prolific. some of the topics from our own faculty of nursing at the university of calgary that have been researched hermeneutically include: families and cardiac disease; therapeutic letters in family systems nursing; grief and family therapy; spirituality and family systems nursing; commendations in family systems nursing; advance care planning; experiences of families with children with progressive life limiting illness; buddhism and mental health nursing; vicarious trauma on nurses working in mental health; family systems nursing for families with a child with cancer; families living with a family member with treatable but incurable cancer; children’s cancer camps; family presence during resuscitation; sexuality, relationships and spinal cord injury; grandparents’ experiences of childhood cancer; impacts of deaths of children on pediatric oncology nurses; and many more topics that are too numerous to name and reference. we have several current studies looking at aspects of families’ experiences of childhood cancer, and the use of arts in teaching. in the book, we speak to starting from a place of philosophy: what does gadamer have to teach us about “being methodical and following leads” (moules et al., 2015, pp. 55-69)? gadamer certainly did not lay out a method for hermeneutic research. in fact, he might be surprised too to find it in nursing or in research at all. he did, however, offer ideas around universality and finitude, historically effected consciousness, language and linguistic being, conversation and dialogue, questions, play, prejudices, the hermeneutic circle, erlebnis and erfahrung, bildung, fusion of horizons, application and phronesis, and transformation into structure. each of these ideas has something to say to us in the conduct of good hermeneutic research. in the book, we suggest guidelines, not as scientific method, which gadamer questioned as the ultimate authority, but as an orientation for direction, much like stars serve for navigation, that which “serves to steady the motion of a thing or journey” (moules et al., 2015, p. 61). guidelines are not methodological imperatives. they are in the service of steady, dependable motion. they are not meant to displace good judgment or extinguish experience…offered in the service of practice and …of the phenomenon. (moules et al., 2015, p. 61) mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 6 the guidelines offered are: 1. the way of hermeneutic practice is determined by the phenomenon, not the method 2. hermeneutic practice requires a disciplined (phenomenological) focus on the particular 3. hermeneutic practice requires that we be vigilant and open in our encounters with the lifeworld 4. reading in the hermeneutic tradition involves a practice of learning to read self and world differently 5. the nature of hermeneutic practice is dialogical. (pp. 62-68) in our work of applied hermeneutics, we are addressed by topics of human concern and practice concern. we answer to this address in the sense of caputo’s ideas of obligation (caputo, 1993) and his thinking “in radical hermeneutics everything turns on saying ‘come’ to the coming of what we cannot see coming, of the unforeseeable” (caputo, 2015, p. ix). with this address, we seek out those who can best inform us around the topic – it may be participants who are interviewed (e.g., grandparents of a child with cancer) or it may be other literature, poetry, films, or documents. if participants are interviewed, we audio tape the interviews and transcribe them and then we approach the text hermeneutically, seeking understanding not explanation. this is not like analysis in other traditions and there are no procedural guidelines that save one from interpretation. it is not looking for themes that are determined or authenticated by repetition, nor is it looking for semantic codes, constructs, or theories. interpretation rather seeks to open understanding, to expose what was lost or forgotten or never seen. it is the work of aletheia. aletheia is a word that is about unconcealment…we have to face the living presence of what we come to suffer or as kearney and caputo suggest – a preparedness to meet the stranger at the door who may be kind or may be a monster. there is hospitality to aletheia – an openness to what might come to, and maybe enter, the door. (moules, 2015, p. 4) what we think caputo was referring to in the foreword of conducting hermeneutic research is the actionability of applied hermeneutics. when philosophy is taken to practice, to human contexts, situations, and suffering – to the great problems that are encountered in the streets, hospitals, homes, or schools it becomes more than words and ideas; it becomes alive, applied, and active. we think that understanding this very thing was at the heart of gadamer’s endeavor and is at the heart of research using hermeneutics. references caputo, j.d. (1993). against ethics: contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. bloomington, in: indiana university press. caputo, j.d. (2015). foreword: the wisdom of hermeneutics. in n.j. moules, g. mccaffrey, j.c. field, & c.m. laing, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice (pp. ixxiii). new york, ny: peter lang. gadamer, h-g. (1996). the enigma of health (j. gaiger & n. walker, trans.). stanford, mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 7 ca: stanford university press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/2004). truth and method (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). london, uk: continuum. moules, n.j. (2015. editorial: aletheia – remembering and enlivening. journal of applied hermeneutics. editorial 2. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5qr4p68 moules, n.j. & mccaffrey, g. (2015). editorial: catching hermeneutics in the act. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 1. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy53n20w8 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. nietzsche, f. (1982). daybreak: thoughts on the prejudices of morality (r.j. hollingdale, trans.). cambridge, uk: cambridge university press. svenaeus, f. (2000). the hermeneutics of medicine and the phenomenology of health. norwell, ma: kluwer academic. microsoft word venturato final pdf.docx corresponding author: lorraine venturato, phd university of calgary email: lventura@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics december 24, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 towards a hermeneutics on ageing: or what gadamer can teach us about growing old lorraine venturato abstract ageing is one of life’s most pervasive shared experiences, and one that is imbued with social, cultural and bio-medical meaning. this paper begins a conversation on what hermeneutics and, in particular the philosophical hermeneutics of gadamer, can add to contemporary understandings of ageing. keywords ageing, hermeneutics, hans-georg gadamer it was the war in the pacific. silk stockings and a pink slip. a quick shimmy down a drainpipe in the middle of the night. she had seemed so old at 92. shrunken. somehow faded and less 60 years evaporated in a heartbeat and there she was. i saw her – finally. shining. somehow so much more ageing is one of life’s most pervasive shared experiences. from the moments we draw our first breath until we breathe our last however long that may be life is essentially a process of venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 2 ageing. indeed the etymology of age/ageing derives from the latin aetatem (nominative aetas) meaning a period of life, lifetime, or years. the association of ageing with old age, in particular, dates back to the 14th century (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ageing) though the term “old age” was not commonly used until the 1900s, with a sharp increase in usage post 1950. as such, the meaning of the word “ageing” has both ancient and contemporary roots. ageing is defined as an organic process of growing older over a period of time, and is akin to maturation or ripeness, a process of becoming old. legouès (in malabou, 2012) compared life to an aeroplane flight with take-off equating to childhood and youth, cruising with adulthood, and descent with ageing. it is also defined as the acquisition of desirable qualities through being left undisturbed for a period of time, as in the ageing of a fine wine or cheese (http:// www.finedictionary.com/ageing.html). however, there is also an association between the idea of ageing and decline of fading or weathering and the physical changes and appearance of old age that represent a palpable manifestation of the passage of time. i suggest that, in contemporary developed nations, this is the pervasive definition of the term “ageing.” over the years of working with older people and researching in the field of ageing, i have been exposed to many understandings of ageing some have required active interpretation, and others have been embedded in the takenfor-granted. ageing has many guises and is understood in a variety of ways. we are aware of chronological ageing as each year ticks by. this gives us a number that can indicate how long we have been caught up in the act of living. as a health care professional, i draw on an understanding of ageing that is biological and bio-medically framed – healthy ageing, normal ageing, and pathological ageing and a myriad of theories that seek to explain the degradation of cells and the wearing out of body systems over time, all of which inform my understanding of a physiological process of ageing as degradation and progression towards death. there are also social and cultural constructions of ageing ways in which ageing has become associated with wisdom and emancipation, as well as cognitive decline, frailty and illness, and death. there are critiques of social norms that drive youth-orientation (apparently its all elvis’s fault) and its resultant impact on ageing and older people; and “grey power” movements that seek to re-associate ageing with wisdom and challenge the negative social commentaries that position older people as vulnerable and a burden on society. these interpretations of ageing serve to shape our social and individual understanding of ageing. in this paper, i present my efforts to begin drawing together an understanding of ageing and old age, informed by the philosophical hermeneutics of hans-georg gadamer (1900 – 2002). in their book on gadamerian hermeneutic research, moules, mccaffrey, field, and laing (2015, p. 202) noted, “hermeneutic questions are hard questions; hermeneutic understanding is hard understanding.” accordingly, my efforts to develop a hermeneutic understanding of ageing is challenging in many ways. first, my understanding of ageing is shaped by social and biomedical interpretations. my education and professional socialisation deeply ingrains and privileges certain interpretations of ageing over others. this is an important acknowledgement in developing an understanding of ageing. for gadamer, any prior understanding of a topic, and the prejudices that we bring to a topic, venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 3 always inform our current interpretation and consequent understanding of it (gadamer, 1960/1989). as with “ageing,” the word “prejudice” is imbued with negative meanings in contemporary english usage. however, prejudice requires acknowledgement that we do not approach any topic as though it were a blank slate; rather, we approach a topic that is already saturated with meaning (moules et al., 2015). the challenge in this lies in the fact that many prejudices lie hidden in the everyday and taken-for-granted. as a health care professional in the area of gerontology, the topic of ageing is saturated with meaning, and a form of scientific political correctness that begs a counter to social and cultural discourses that still shape my understandings. so, while i have professional discourses and meanings that sit within my discipline and education, i am also aware of and subject to, at a more personal level, socially and culturally derived meanings that shape my personal experience of the phenomena of ageing. to step outside these interpretive limitations and be open to other understandings requires an openness to the other (gadamer, 1960/1989). davey (2006, p. xvi) noted, “openness to the other requires a particular refinement: the skill of being critically distant while remaining involved, attentive, and caring.” a second challenge in developing a hermeneutics of ageing lies in gadamer’s assertion that there can be no final word in hermeneutics and, therefore, no first word in hermeneutic understanding. rather, gadamer defined understanding as a relationship and as a dialogue (grondin, 1994), less like grasping content and more like a continuous dialogue. in this respect, a hermeneutics of ageing both arises from and informs the dialogue on ageing, while claiming to be neither the first, nor final word. the meaning of ageing will continue to evolve, and grasping for such an elusive meaning may be deemed self-indulgent at best. a third and final challenge stems from the primacy of the biomedical paradigm, which not only privileges certain lenses and interpretations of the topic of ageing, but also serves to limit our understanding of it. more concerning still is that such a dominant paradigm in ageing is selflimiting because it also constrains the possibilities for questions we might ask. for me, this has been a defining feature of this movement towards a hermeneutic of ageing, which started with a discussion with a colleague. in considering submitting an abstract for a presentation at the north american society for philosophical hermeneutics (nasph) 2015 conference, i commented to my colleague that i had nothing to present. her rather off-the-cuff response to “write a hermeneutics of ageing” left me reeling. it was the suddenness of the recognition that, in all my many understandings of ageing and despite having a research chair in gerontology and considering myself a hermeneut at heart, i had never considered how a hermeneutics of ageing might add to the dialogue and understanding of the topic. it was, as gadamer wrote, a call to action. gadamer (1960/1989. p. 299) also wrote “understanding begins when something addresses us.” my professional understanding of ageing began when i was a student nurse working in a nursing home in australia. (i use the term “professional understanding” here as, like most people, i had a concept of ageing that was socially and culturally derived, and that i brought with me into my professional role). the poem at the beginning of this paper is based on my journal notes following an evening shift where i spent time talking to mary, a frail 92-year woman. in hindsight, the moment marked a shift; it was a profound “aha” moment that re-charted my professional course. i realised that mary was more than the sum of her wrinkles, her pains, and her considerable venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 4 medications and, despite the ravages of time evident in faces and bodies, despite a range of illnesses and medical woes – all of which are fascinating to a nursing student – the person inside is always present and does not necessarily experience the ravages of time at the same rate and in the same way as the physical body. this was also the first time i saw mary as less “other,” and became aware of our similarities. until then, i had been lulled by the outward signs of her age into thinking of her as somehow intrinsically different to me. today, this has particular implications for my professional focus on the concepts of personhood and selfhood as they pertain to older people living with dementia and other forms of cognitive impairment. it also reflects what davey (2006, p. 117) referred to as “the hermeneutic experience of being addressed,” which includes a recognition that we are not as well acquainted with our topic as we assumed, and then forging ahead with a new apprehension. mary shared with me a story about an evening during the second world war. her story jolted me in much the same way my colleague’s remark about a hermeneutics of ageing jolted me years later. i remember thinking, how did i not “see” this before. it changed my understanding of ageing in a profound way and started a professional interest that continues today. davey (2006, p. 118) referred to this as a “phenomenological shift from absentmindedness to mindfulness” that occurs “when what we have unknowingly experienced as the everyday is transformed.” according to gadamer (cited in davey, 2006, p. 118), this transformation is associated with the greek goddess mnemosyne. he wrote “mnemosyne rules everything: to keep in memory means to be human.” mnemosyne was also the mother of the nine muses, who inspire and nurture creativity through the arts and aesthetic endeavours. gadamer’s reflections in this area stimulates thought in relation to the nature of understanding ageing, and concepts of self and personhood for older people with dementia, and offer insight into how our memories and our sense of the world or our ability to interpret and make sense of the world through our senses, as grondin (2015) stated – appears to be both diminished and intact in someone with dementia. while i may take some issue with gadamer’s statement that memory equates in some way to humanness, his work on aesthetics and understanding and his invocation of mnemosyne, have shaped my work with older people with dementia through creative attempts to generate meaning and understanding. this is probably most evident through a mixed research and creative arts project that occurred in australia in 2013/2014 (venturato, 2015). we used an interpretive photographic approach to understand the world of older people with dementia living in a nursing home. our project entailed collaborative work between two photo-documentarists, ten older people with dementia living in two nursing homes, and myself. this work culminated with a public exhibition and public forum, where a panel of “experts” discussed ideas of creativity and ageing. the work highlighted a number of aspects of living with dementia and served to open dialogue with families, staff, and management. it became evident that older people with dementia maintained capacity to interpret and generate meaning in their life in various ways and that memory, interpretation, and meaning were much more complex than the results of an mri scan or a mini mental assessment score. as a researcher, it was satisfying to witness “aha” moments in nursing home staff as they reconsidered what they knew about the residents in the project, and older people with dementia in general. perhaps more satisfying, was witnessing our participants fully addressed as whole venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 5 people, beyond the constraints of medicalised diagnoses and perceived limitations. davey (2013, p. 68) noted that gadamer recognises the ability of art to address those concerns that “define us as human beings” and to “transform our understanding of them.” indeed, art’s compelling power lies in its ability to clarify aspects of our everyday concerns which, without its intervention, would remain unresolved. unlike life, art offers meanings ‘with nothing out of place’. it is precisely because of the compelling interests which shape our human horizon that we are susceptible to art’s claim. (davey, 2013, p. 68) moules et al. (2015) offered an important insight into the way gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics can guide further understanding of ageing through offering a number of guidelines for hermeneutic practice. in the spirit of gadamer’s reluctance to provide a methodology for hermeneutics, the authors are careful to note that such guidelines do not represent an attempt at methodological imperatives or a final word on the practice of understanding through hermeneutic explanation. rather they offer a guide to practically derive interpretations, while maintaining a philosophical orientation towards the phenomena of interest. the first guideline offered by moules et al. (2015) encourages a focus on phenomena rather than method. thus, coming to a hermeneutics of ageing requires one to go beyond method, and to be more concerned with substance than procedure. this is not to say that anything goes, but that interpretation is framed around careful attention, creative construction of possibilities, and grounded in experience. the second guideline refers to the requirement for a disciplined focus on the phenomenon (the particular) (moules et al., 2015). we are addressed by something, and by something that is significant. this is a complex process whereby understanding is fuelled by the particular and conversely, the particular is fuelled by new understanding. they noted “it is the detailed familiarity of the cases that strikes us; it is the detailed strangeness of the case that surprises us” (moules et al., 2015, p. 64). this requirement for a disciplined focus on the phenomenon also entails a temporal dimension. a hermeneutics of ageing considers the past, present, and future in order to re-envision ageing in a way that is both familiar and new. the third guideline requires vigilance and openness in our encounters with phenomena. within this, there is recognition of the risk inherent in being open to the other, in being flexible, in opening our prejudices and pre-understandings and our assumptions to change. this requires vigilance and constant attention in developing openness. such openness requires practice and this is particularly essential when one is embedded in knowing the phenomenon and in particular, when situated as an “expert” in the phenomenon. rather, remaining open lies in positioning oneself as a learner, embedded in a continual process of curiosity and truth seeking. the fourth guideline encourages us to read the self and the world differently. in this respect, they urge us to read slowly and methodically, to read for possibilities, and to allow the phenomenon to open up. this is reading in a transformative sense, rather than the digestion and interpretation of meaning and intent learnt in the traditional or technical sense of reading. thus a hermeneutics of ageing would consider the prejudices or pre-understandings, our perceptions, and the contexts that shape our perceptions and seek to transform understanding through the interplay between venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 6 text, self, and world a fusion of horizons that supports the movement and expansion of understanding in light of its encounter with history and tradition (recognises the present through the past) and dialogue. the fifth and final guideline recognises hermeneutic practice as dialogical. in this respect, hermeneutics entails entering into a dialogical relationship that recognises, and is open to, the possibility that the other may be right. it maintains a continual movement between question and answer and recognises that such conversations are ongoing. in this respect, a hermeneutics on ageing does not seek to have the final word on ageing but to contribute to the on-going conversation. there are many other aspects of gadamer’s work that offer insights into understanding ageing; in particular, aletheia and bildung offer insights into new possibilities for thinking about ageing. as moules et al. (2015) suggested, the process of hermeneutic understanding requires patience and flexibility; it is slow, methodical, and continuously open to new possibilities. this work represents this first step into the development of a hermeneutics of ageing, as a counterweight to social and biomedical understandings. references ageing. (n.d). fine dictionary. retrieved from (http://www.finedictionary.com/ageing.html) may 31, 2015. ageing. (n.d). dictionary.com. retrieved from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ageing may 31, 2015. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: state university of new york press. davey, n. (2013). unfinished worlds: hermeneutics, aesthetics and gadamer. edinburgh, scotland: edinburgh university press. gadamer, h.g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev.ed., j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.) new york, ny: continuum. grondin, j. (1994). introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. new haven, ct: yale university press. grondin, j. (2015). keynote presentation at the canadian hermeneutic institute. may 20-22, 2015. halifax, ns, canada. malibou, c. (2012). ontology of the accident: an essay in destructive plasticity (c. shread, trans.). cambridge, uk, polity press. venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 7 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. venturato. l. (2015, in press). nurturing creativity and understanding in the care of frail older people. the arts collective. accepted for publication january 2015. microsoft word moulesetal2013.docx 1 university of calgary corresponding author: dr. n.j. moules email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics march 21, 2013 the author(s) 2013 “isn’t all of oncology hermeneutic?” nancy j. moules1, david w. jardine1, graham p. mccaffrey1, & christopher brown1 abstract in this paper, we describe an event during a pediatric oncology research meeting that prompted the discussion of the ways in which hermeneutics brings a different kind of understanding to both research and practice. we claim that oncology is the practical science of handling natural science research and as such practice in oncology is deeply hermeneutic in character in its recognition of the importance, vitality, and generativity of the “individual case” even in the face of amassed, verified, and aggregate knowledge that is given from the natural science research. oncology is always contingent, next case handling, and is not identifiable simply as something determined and guided by natural sciences alone. in the face of this, we propose that there is an obvious, profound, and natural fit of hermeneutic research in understanding the lives, relationships, suffering, and experiences that are affected by cancer. keywords childhood cancer, gadamer, hermeneutics, pediatric oncology, robert buckman the impetus for this paper arose during an alberta children’s hospital pediatric oncology research day in november 2012 in calgary, alberta where dedicated researchers presented the work they were currently conducting in efforts to cure, treat, and make sense of childhood cancer. most of the research presented was that of bench and natural science, understanding the progression of tumours, the impact of radiation on mice, randomized control trials, or evidence of the potential of a new chemotherapeutic agent. dr. nancy moules, alberta children’s hospital foundation and research institute nursing professorship in child and family centred cancer care, presented her research on understanding the impact of childhood cancer on lives and relationships, and her research approach of hermeneutics. in this context with this audience, it is a shared understanding that there is a very human experience of cancer and an appreciation that bench science offers one way of moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 2 knowing that must be translated in another kind of knowing that is handled in the day-today practical decisions, judgments about, and interactions with those undergoing such experiences. cancer is readily understood as an affliction that can affect all aspects of a person’s life, a phenomenon replete with complex and often contradictory cultural, historical, and personal/familial understandings, assumptions, hopes, fears, and expectations. there exists a whole world of lived experience that precedes bench science and provides it with the contexts of its application and the conditions of its value. moules, in her description of hermeneutics as a legitimate research method in understanding cancer, moved past the very public cry for finding “cures” for cancer and into the lives of people who have cancer, who may or may not be treated successfully, who may die, who may suffer losses to their sense of self, their body image, or their peace of mind. there is something inherently difficult when we add this mention of suffering. over and above the sought-for clarities of bench science, doctors, nurses, and other health professionals must learn to live with what they know and to handle this knowledge well, with a sense of dignity and proportion that is acutely aware that this knowledge inevitably invokes a whole life-world of experience and faces medical practitioners and patients and families alike with the experience of suffering. in the valuation of research that seeks for cure, there is hope and fear, and an awed waiting upon the presumed inevitable triumph of science. hermeneutics is a form of research into the effects of cancer on individuals and families, as well as the effects of cancer on those treating such individuals and families, a method that opens a way to inquiry into all of these considerations, in all their awkwardness and difficulty. yet, in this context, as in many others, hermeneutics is again and again required to account for itself, while all along addressing the suffering that is attendant upon childhood cancer. hermeneutics is frequently asked to live up to the ways, means, and methods of the natural sciences. in addressing the issue of numbers and power in this kind of research, moules briefly outlined some of the ideas in dr. david jardine's (1992) “the fecundity of the individual case” which demonstrated the strengths that surround hermeneutic work and the vital importance of hermeneutics as a way to understand the living character of our living professions. it is in the power of the particular in the recognition of one voice, one experience, one diminishment of suffering, one experience of healing that our professions have always found their real power and their real, living knowledge. it is in the moment of being present at the death of one child; or watching one patient walk for the first time on artificial limbs; or the privilege of being present while this family hears bad news or good news. it is in the richness of the power of these individual, particular moments of grace, kinship, and human relationship where the professions have always found their own graceful and powerful place in the context of one human life, here and now, in this, and this, and this (wallace, 1987). in this forum and in reaction to this sketching out of the nature of hermeneutic knowledge and its place in our profession, dr. peter craighead, professor and head of the department of oncology at tom baker cancer centre, rose and said, in response. “yes, this makes sense to me. isn’t all of oncology hermeneutic?” a part of this response was rooted in dr. craighead's respect for a recently deceased colleague. dr. robert buckman died at 63 years of age on october 9, 2011. a renowned medical oncologist, author, and comedian, dr. buckman was known for his unorthodox apmoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 3 proach to illness and death. he was reported to have once commented that it was the individual person who changed his practice every time. in this regard, dr. buckman was arguing for something subtly hermeneutic about his practice and about the knowledge that arises only in practice. it was not simply that the individual patient was more important than his aggregate knowledge of oncology, but that the confrontation with the individual, the particular, always enlivened, challenged, and informed that very knowledge, keeping it awake, alert, and in proper perspective. he held his amassed professional knowledge with a certain readiness and “lightness,” as could always be seen from the often sheer delight with which he greeted “the next case.” the next case always seemed to arrive as an opportunity to open up his vast knowledge and to let it be susceptible to what enlivening difference this new arrival might make. he embodied this openness with his patients, with the general public, and in relation to his own suffering. dr. buckman provided us with a strong confirmation of the vitality and importance of hermeneutics to professional life and practice, as demonstrated in the title of one of his books, cancer is a word, not a sentence (2006). for the experienced practitioner, the arrival of “the next case” involves its arrival into a territory of knowledge and experience for which that case provides a live and rich occasioning of our attention. the experienced practitioner is one who must remain open to such arrivals and the differences that can be made to them, to us and to the life and wellbeing of the living discipline(s) we are inhabiting with our patients and their families. the word “case,” long since incorporated into medical, legal, and other professional speech, has this sense of arrival in its origin. case derives from the latin casus, meaning a chance, occasion, opportunity; accident, mishap. literally, it means “a falling.” in the 13th century, it had the meaning of “what befalls one” and in the 18th century began to be adopted by medicine (online etymology dictionary, 2012). a case is something that has befallen one. despite the professional control implied in the “case history” or the “case study,” when a doctor or nurse meets a person with cancer, something “befalls” the professional too. the next case of a patient is not simply an “existential” matter of it being this person and no one else, and therefore a matter of the irreplaceable life of this individual who is not replaceable in their suffering with anyone else. all this is certainly true. the issue is what difference it makes to those of us who already know much about such suffering, who have already witnessed a long line of symptoms and presentations and varieties of heartache or fear or bold readiness to do “battle” with the invader. the issue is how our knowledge is not simply “amassed verified knowledge” (gadamer, 1989, p. xxi) anonymously held in some figurative storehouse, so that this new arrival simply gets slotted into the right locale of that store. our knowledge is also a form of readiness for new experience it opens towards this new arrival in anticipation of being called to account, of being summoned and needing to respond professionally, “properly,” in ways that gadamer (1989) described as “relations of responding and summoning” (p. 458). this describes the profound vulnerability of our professional bearing that we deliberately make ourselves and what we know susceptible to the subtleties of what is arriving. more than this, it is because we are experienced that we are able to find this carrying of ourselves practicable, day-to-day. this susceptibility is a matter of how we experience our experience; whether we can see ourselves not only out of the authority of our expertise, but also as being experienced by the other. experience in this sense includes humility; it is permeable and reciprocal, and inevitably atmoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 4 tendant upon that which it does not produce from itself and its own storehouse of knowledge. as gadamer (1996) noted in his essay hermeneutics and psychiatry, “…the doctor needs more than just scientific and technical knowledge and professional experience” (p. 172). the doctor or the nurse also needs a well-honed sense of practical knowledge and practical judgment, wherein individual cases are treated with a sense of proper proportion borne of practice itself (what aristotle called phronesis rather than techne). these two forms of knowledge are not in a battle with one another for the same territory or voice, but neither is one simply replaceable for the other or able to do the work of the other. “although the expertise of a technical knowledge...has a proximity to phronesis, technical knowledge does not ask the question of the good or the just comprehensively, or it does not allow us to act comprehensively in each situation” (gadamer, 2007b, p. 232). an experienced hematologist/oncologist colleague offered this view: i deal with very nasty malignant diseases. fatal if our therapies don’t work. each of these diseases can be categorized under broad headings and, as our knowledge advances, increasingly narrow subheadings. such a degree of organization implies that a process of inquiry about this disease has revealed enough to form the basis of a broadly accepted approach to the disease, a therapeutic plan, a management strategy. for many disease entities we have such an approach. “you have disease x and the book says do this.” it doesn’t always work as well as is hoped but at least we have a plan. this makes medicine sound quite formulaic and from a biomedical perspective this is what we strive for the magic formula. a moment of reflection will reveal that these formulae provide strategies for managing diseases. but diseases exist in people and our magic formulae rarely take that into account. hermeneutics provides a form of research geared to precisely such difficult accounting. it does so by reformulating what it means to “apply” what one knows in a specific case. it is not that those who practice within the natural sciences and help to develop such knowledge that provide formulae do not care about individual cases; they do this work because they care deeply. hermeneutics, however, maintains that the difficulty of these cases and the complexity of the human experience of them can be understood and known. science might question the study of such things as perhaps only subjective, private, and even indemonstrable, or that if they are to be studied, they must be subjected to the particular rigour of the scientific method. hermeneutics provides a way to study human experience that does not subject it to the demands of the natural sciences, but still provides dynamic, rich, compelling, and detailed understanding and description that leaves all of their difficulty and ambiguity in place and makes it available to thinking, communication, sharing, and a deeper understanding of, and sensitivity to, the subtleties of lived experience. hermeneutics also provides ways to improve practice through studies of lived experience by pointing to the layers of ambiguous entailment in which live with our patients – the coming of the death of a child is troublesome, terrible, surrounded by myriad tales, images, and fears. understanding this in detail improves the practice of oncology, not by “nailing down” something more securely but by honing and shaping our ability to be aware of and articulate our lived surroundings. in truth and method, gadamer (1989) demonstrated how understanding, in this hermoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 5 meneutic sense, is “more a passion than an action” (p. 366). it is not the application of a rule to a case but more like the application of a case to a rule. our already established “magic formulae” must befall and respond to the demands that the new case brings and expects of such knowledge. this knowledge is something we must therefore “undergo,” something we must “suffer.” in choosing to work in an area such as oncology, one agrees to this hermeneutic wager, to a willingness to not only suffer but to “suffer together” in the way that moules (1999) wrote of compassion as a hermeneutic endeavor that is willful and deliberate. this is why gadamer suggested that at the heart of this living knowledge is an old greek adage: pathei mathos: “learning through suffering” (gadamer, 1989, p. 356), an idea itself inherited from the greek tragedies of aeschylus (c. 525 bce). the hermeneutic tradition recognizes that there is something inherently difficult and transformative in the act of becoming experienced in the ways of the world, and from such a process “no one can be exempt” (gadamer, 1989, p. 355). this claim about experience extends across the whole gamut of human life, from small, exhilarating interruptions of one’s expectations (moments of inquiry, learning, engagement, investigation, questioning) to traumatic experiences of mortality, impermanence, and illness (moments considered “life changing”). in all these cases, the learning and teaching that ensues is understood as “an adventure and, like any adventure, it always involves some risk” (gadamer, 1983, p. 141), including, of necessity, “moments of loss of self” (gadamer, 1977, p. 51) wherein who i understand myself to be and what i understand of the world might have to endure suffering change. this is why, as professionals, we are drawn towards the suffering of others because it is there that we experience a deep insight into our shared human lot. this, again, recalls the example of dr. buckman and his willingness to step into the suffering of others and to use his own suffering as way to help others. application is neither a subsequent nor merely an occasional part of the phenomenon of [hermeneutic] understanding, but codetermines it as a whole form the beginning. this does not mean that…he first understands [some pregiven universal] per se, and then afterward uses it for particular applications. rather, the interpreter seeks no more than to understand this universal -i.e., to understand what it says, what constitutes [its] meaning and significance. in order to understand that, he must not try to disregard himself and his particular hermeneutical situation. he must relate [it] to this situation if he wants to understand at all. (gadamer, 1989, p. 324) this next patient, this next presentation of symptoms, these next uttered words of concern, do not simply “fall under” general principles or established knowledge, but ask something of this knowledge. they ask of the general principle that it proves itself “in this case” to be adequate to such a case. this ability to deftly judge the relationship between established knowledge and the arrival of a new case is itself a type of practical knowledge that does not operate in the same way as the establishment of that natural scientific knowledge itself. it is, rather, a cluster of contingent practical judgments. one can become practiced in such judgments, but one cannot give a set of rules for how to make such judgments because those rules, in turn, would require cultivating, in practice, an understanding of their application. each patient is embarking on a difficult journey on a road that is unknown to them. a part of our responsibility as physicians is to prepare our patients for the journey and then walk with them. that moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 6 comes partly by providing them with insight about what may lie ahead and the likelihood of having to change plans according to what happens on the journey. the conversation needs to be ongoing and open-ended. things change. i start such a conversation by asking the patient and family to explain to me what they know about their disease and what is being offered. for me, it defines the starting point and strategy of our ongoing conversation and it is often a unique starting point and always a unique strategy. the hermeneutic object of interest is the ability, in practice, to recognize a case as a case of some general principle, as a case that exemplifies it, modifies it, defies it, or “nearly fits” or demands that our established knowledge gain more subtlety, differentiation, and acuity. this judgment is not a matter of simply applying the general principle to the case, but allowing the case to “speak back” to that already-established knowledge in such a way that the case puts the principle into question and demands that the knowledge already established gives an account of its applicability in the face of the demands made by the case: the ordering of life by rules of law…is incomplete and needs productive supplementation. at issue is always something more than the correct application of general principles. our knowledge…is always supplemented by the individual case, even productively determined by it. the judge not only applies the law in concreto, but contributes through his very judgment to developing the law. [our knowledge] is constantly developed through the fecundity of the individual case. (gadamer, 1989, p. 38) the individual case on which judgment works is never simply a case; it is not exhausted by being a particular example of a universal law or concept. rather, it is always an “individual case,” and it is significant that we call it a special case, because the rule does not [and cannot] comprehend [this individuality]. every judgment about something intended in its concrete individuality (e.g., the judgment required in a situation that calls for action) is - strictly speaking -a judgment about a special case. that means nothing less than that judging the case involves not merely applying the universal principle according to which it is judged, by co-determining, supplement, and correcting that principle. (gadamer, 1989, p. 39) negotiating this susceptibility of established knowledge to the arrival of the next case is the work of hermeneutics and it is the work of oncology. “the true locus of hermeneutics is this in-between” (gadamer, 1989, p. 295). this is how professions, of necessity, are not simply the impervious and imperial wielding of “amassed verified knowledge.” professionals seek out instances of suffering or undergoing, instances of susceptibility where the locale of meeting a challenge to our knowledge is at once a locale of meeting our patient “in” this suffering, “in” the locale of taking seriously their arrival as requiring us, with all our aggregate knowledge of, and familiarity with, such matters, to engage this arrival. we, like them, must allow what we know to come into play with the person that has arrived with questions, knowledge, fears, concerns, evidence, foibles, resolve, and all the particularities of presentation. this is the negotiation that is at the heart of diagnosis, that our aggregate knowledge is not simply a slot into which the new patient fits, but is, rather, something that must, with great subtlety, respond well to that arrival and let that arrival do the work proper to its particularity. we know, as professionals, that we can, with those new to our profession, lay out the critemoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 7 ria of a particular pathology, but we cannot outrun the difficulty of recognizing this case as an example of that pathology. i met with the patient and family to discuss what we had to offer to treat the leukemia and our chances of success. they asked insightful questions. i was told, “if my number is up there is nothing i can do about it but let’s try our best.” there was a peace in the room. the treatment went well at the beginning but then went off the rails. each challenge was faced with determination and a calmness as “the number” came up. our conversations had remained easy despite the increasing gravity of what we were discussing and often we had shared a laugh. after many weeks of struggle, the patient passed away with the family at their side. this is a practical form of knowledge that cannot be amassed theoretically, nor can it be simply handed over to another professional without that person having to now cultivate this knowledge for him or herself. a common adage in the work of oncology is the “experienced” practitioner. hermeneutics identifies how “becoming experienced” is not a matter of simply an increased expertise in “amassed verified [bench science] knowledge” (gadamer 1989, p. xxi) but an increased deftness in how one “handles” such knowledge in practice. being experienced does not culminate in knowing more and better than anyone else (the sort of required expertise in the “amassed verified knowledge” of one’s field requisite of being “knowledgeable in the field”). hermeneutics points to another vital and essential form of knowledge and experience that are not of the same kind of knowledge as this expertise. “experience has its proper fulfillment not in definitive [amassed] knowledge but in the openness to [new] experience[s] that is made possible by experience itself” (gadamer 1989, p. 355). an experienced doctor or nurse, therefore, is not simply someone who as been in such a profession for many years. being experienced, in hermeneutics, is connected with an old concept from the humanist tradition: bildung (bruford, 2010; gadamer, 1989; pinar, 2011; von humbolt 2000), a german term meaning self-formation, that is, the endured process of becoming someone in the act of coming to know about oneself and the world. this site of becoming someone is the site of pathei mathos because it requires a type of “undergoing” or “suffering” in which one risks becoming changed and having to live with the consequences. i met with the patient and family to discuss what we had to offer to treat the leukemia and our chances of success. they asked insightful questions. i was told, “if my number is up there is nothing i can do about it but let’s try our best.” there was palpable fear in the room and the patient looked truly terrified. the next questions were, “what will happen to me?” and “what are my chances?” i started over again and tried a different approach. the treatment went badly from an early stage. each challenge was faced with determination but the terror never left the patient’s eyes. i was never sure if my conversations were answering their questions or addressing their needs. after many weeks of struggle, the patient passed away with the family at their side. this situation started and ended the same as the one described before it, but in the middle of it something changed, something that called the oncologist to realize that no amount of amassed and aggregate knowledge or mastery of such knowledge, no “magic formulae,” could save the oncologist from the “deliberation and decision” to move and act differently in this case (gadamer, 1983, p. 113). gadamoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 8 mer advanced the idea of hermeneutics as a condition of being human, an inescapable immersion in making sense of the world, but always finitely, always open to reinterpretation. this does not mean, however, that hermeneutic reflection is automatic. bildung demands effort and practice; hermeneutic experience has an ethical dimension of choosing to make oneself available to the difficulty of life, the pathei mathos. in this encounter, the oncologist persevered in the face of the disease, in facing the terror in the patient’s eyes, and in facing the fact that he could never be sure. concluding reflections when a diagnosis is confirmed for a patient, or particular symptoms are described as such, the oncologist is able to “hear” a wide range of possibilities and probabilities. there is an ability to know, from long experience, something of a patient's possible future(s) and possible future suffering in ways that someone without this expertise simply could not. this is not exactly the same as simply “having the facts” but rather knowing that the facts alone will not save you or address the situation. there is that wonderful/terrible weight of then having to decide what might be best to say or not say, to indicate, or clothe, or to be straightforward about. this sort of judgment and its soundness and trustworthiness is an amazing thing. as professionals knowledgeable in our fields, we sometimes hold back in having a patients bear all the weight of what could be said, not to be dishonest, but to be measured and to try to act properly, in proper proportion to the best reading that can given of the full breadth of the circumstances. this is something of why and how we are professionals and not only technicians in possession of amassed scientific knowledge: the way of life of human beings is not fixed by nature like other living beings. knowingly preferring one thing to another and consciously choosing among possible alternatives is the unique and specific characteristic of human being. the knowledge that gives direction to action is essentially called for by concrete situations in which we are required to choose the thing to be done and no learned and mastered technique can spare us the task of deliberation and decision. (gadamer, 2007b, pp. 230-231) even though we slowly, through practice and experience, become more receptive to the arrival of the next case and the difference it will bring, it always also feels like the first time as well; it feels brand new this family, that child, those odd descriptions of symptoms, real, imagined, dreamt, feared, or seen with terrible clarity. as buckman reminded us, walking into the room of the next patient will forever change our practices, but this requires an awareness that something has changed as well as an opening not to just find what fits with what we already know but what informs us anew. gadamer (2007a) suggested that “[the world] compels over and over, and the better one knows it, the more compelling it is. this is not a matter of mastering an area of study” (p. 115). this is the practical knowledge or “being experienced” that is the object of research in hermeneutic work and it: does have a certain proximity to the expert knowledge that is proper to technique, but what separates it fundamentally from technical expertise is that it expressly asks the question of the good--for example, about the best way of life [or about what course of action would be better than others]. it does not merely master an ability, like technical expertise, whose task is set by an outside authority [e.g., the methods of natural science in producing experimoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 9 mental results, or the simple rote following of procedures in a hospital unit] or by the purpose to be served by what is being produced [e.g., given we have to reduce wait times, do this instead of that]. (gadamer, 2007b, p. 232) robert buckman knew something of suffering, but perhaps his greatest wisdom was that he did not claim to know it with certainty and finality, because he understood that that is not our lot, as humans, to know once and for all. even knowledge that has been pinned down with great precision by natural scientific methodology does not help us avoid having to decide, contingently and carefully, as to whether this is a case of that, and if it is, what we might now best do with those whose suffering is in our hands. buckman saw suffering as the thing that could only be approached through a hermeneutic wager that the next “case” would indeed change the face of understanding the minute the door was opened. oncology is world of discovery, of devout care and intense search for cure. the natural and biological sciences are responsible for significant decreases in cancer morbidity, long-term cure, and longevity of life. this world of science and discovery is vital but there is another world inherent in oncology a world of the individual case, the n=1. this is a particular world of suffering that is not disembodied or detached from the rest of the world of scientific discovery, for it is fecund with its own kind of discovery, where fear shows or it does not, and even if the outcomes are the same, the process of getting there never is. it is the argument for the innate fit of hermeneutic inquiry and research into the worlds of particulars, worlds that do not stand alone but have always something to say to the next door. authors nancy j. moules, rn, phd is a professor in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary. she also holds an alberta children’s hospital foundation/alberta children’s hospital research institute nursing professorship in child and family centred cancer care. david w. jardine, phd is a professor in the faculty of education at the university of calgary. graham p. mccaffrey, rn, phd is an assistant professor in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary. christopher b. brown, md, frcp is a professor in the departments of medicine, oncology, and biochemistry & molecular biology. he is affiliated with the southern alberta cancer institute. references arendt, h. (1969). between past and future: eight exercises in political thought. new york, ny: penguin books. buckman, r. (2005). cancer is a word, not a sentence: a practical guide to help you through the first few weeks. toronto, on, canada: key porter books. bruford, w. h. (2010). the german tradition of self-cultivation: 'bildung' from humboldt to thomas mann. cambridge, ma: cambridge university press. case. (n.d.). in in online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http;//www .etymonline.com gadamer, h.g. (1996). hermeneutics and psychiatry. in h.g. gadamer, the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 10 (pp. 163-174). stanford, ca: stanford university press. gadamer, h.g. (1983). reason in the age of science (f.g. lawrence, trans.). boston, ma: mit press. gadamer, h. g. (1977). philosophical hermeneutics. berkeley, ca: university of california press. gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (j. weinsheimer, trans.). new york, ny: continuum books. gadamer, h.g. (2007a). from word to concept: the task of hermeneutics as philosophy. in r.e. palmer (ed. & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 108-122). evanston, il: northwestern university press. gadamer, h.g. (2007b). hermeneutics as practical philosophy. in r.e. palmer (ed. & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 227-245). evanston il: northwestern university press. jardine, d. (1992). “the fecundity of the individual case”: considerations of the pedagogic heart of interpretive work. british journal of philosophy of education, 26(1), 51-61. moules, n.j. (1999). guest editorial. suffering together: whose words were they? journal of family nursing, 5(3), 251-258. pinar, w. (2011). the character of curriculum studies: bildung, currere, and the recurring question of the subject. new york, ny: palgrave macmillan. von humbolt, w. (2000 [1793-1794]). theory of bildung. in i. westbury, s. hopmann, and k. riquarts (eds.), teaching as a reflective practice: the german didaktik tradition (pp. 57-61). (trans. by g. horton-krüger.). mahwah, nj: lawrence erlbaum. wallace, b. (1987). the stubborn particulars of grace. toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. microsoft word williamson editorial .docx corresponding author: w. john williamson, phd email: john.williamson@cssd.ab.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 11, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 guest editorial: preface to “a strange and earnest client” part one of the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery w. john williamson, phd ladies and gentlemen, the story you are about to see is true. the names have been changed to protect the innocent (mytvmemories, 2012). this phrase, so familiar it long ago lapsed into cliché and parody, announced the beginning of every episode of the long-running, and decidedly un-ironic, police procedural television series dragnet. i revive it now, in its original earnestness to maintain that the story that i am introducing in this editorial is true as well. the story is part one of a serialized publication of my phd thesis a hermeneutic exploration of the educational category of slow learner written as a hardboiled detective novel in the style of raymond chandler (1888-1959). it is essentially a fictionalized and stylized narrative of my ongoing journey (through research and direct experience) into special education thought and practice as it pertains to students named “slow learners” and, more broadly at times, to educational classification and sorting. if the story has “worked,” the narrative should largely imply some justification for this approach. in this editorial, i articulate why i chose to present hermeneutic phenomenological research in this way. in my candidacy exam, i was asked about the hermeneutic warrant for presenting research in this way and my response, after invaluable participation and augmentation from my doctoral supervisor dr. jim field as a co-author, was published as a paper in this journal (williamson & field, 2014). this was a fruitful exercise as it helped me develop the set of hermeneutic principles that i tried to follow in composing the story as well as yielding several insights that made their way into the final novelization in fictionalized form. i return to some of the themes to offer the main hermeneutic warrant for this form of presentation in a piece of writing that stands alone as an introduction to part one of the novelization. it is also an opportunity to reflect back on the hermeneutic warrant for the piece as a completed work, a vantage only available upon completion. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 2 speculation in the williamson and field original paper, it was discussed how, while often imbued with artistic truth, fictional writing obviously surrenders some amount of what might be considered truth as correspondence. what is gained in this surrender is an abundance of speculation, an essential and life-giving characteristic of all acts of communication (gadamer, 2004, p. 452) as well as those of imagination (gough, 2008, p. 338). speculative flights of fancy help us see and understand differently and they occasion discoveries. speculation has been responsible for philosophical thought experiments that have helped us re-examine our behaviour and moral intuitions. singer (2009), for example, speculatively equated the reluctance of many in the developed world to do very much to help starving populations on the other side of the world with an urban citizen who encounters a child drowning in a shallow pond and willingly ruins a new pair of shoes to wade in and save the child. in doing so, he asks why if we would readily sacrifice the value of a pair of shoes to save a life in this situation, so few of us contribute this same monetary amount that we would spend on a new pair of shoes (which he calculates could go a long way in providing for an impoverished child) to eradicate the epidemic of extreme poverty across the world (pp. 1-5). mary shelley, in a query that continues to haunt bioethical reckoning, wondered what the consequences would be if a brilliant scientist usurped the power of creation (srour, 2008). beyond these tests of moral principles, einstein, as a generative scientist wondered impossibly if he could chase a light beam at the speed of light in a vacuum, whether the light would appear still or oscillating to him, and in this thought experiment found “the germ of the special relativity theory” (norton, 2004). in this particular circumstance, the issue in need of re-imagining is primarily a moral one. it involves a psychological category of students who cognitive tests (that the education system endorse as sacrosanct) evaluate as below average in full-scale intelligence and in need of additional support to succeed in school. despite this evaluation, slow learners are a group of students for whom the education system in alberta has ironically failed to provide any of the funding and support it offers other categories of students said to have exceptional needs. it is true that a special education/inclusive education system that claims to support students in reaching their full potential, but that often results in social exclusion and negative self-fulfilling prophesies has been often been a topic of more (ostensively) traditional academic research (e.g., armstrong, 2012; couture, 2012; gilham, 2013; graham & slee, 2008). though roughly conforming to expectations of standard academic formatting, much of this work is troubling, insightful, and highly original and i found several texts about the excesses and deficiencies of special education/inclusive education systems indispensable to my project. when it came to my particular topic, and my unique relationship to it, however, it was felt that much more could be “unconcealed” (heidegger, 1962, p. 147) via an additional speculative turn. as framed in the previous paper, this speculation was “what would happen if we perceived and treated mysterious gaps in programming for students the same way we treat hard-boiled mysteries involving crimes such as homicide, or in this particular case, missing persons?” what understandings might this occasion?” (williamson & field, 2014, p.15). williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 3 mysteries, hermeneutic and hard-boiled the concept of mystery is integral to this speculation, and is, indeed frequently discussed in hermeneutic philosophy (e.g., caputo, 1987; davey, 2006; gadamer, 2004). mystery, a word that means and/or has meant, “religious truth via divine revelation, hidden spiritual significance, mystical truth, secret rites, secret worship, to close or shut, a trade or craft, a secret or hidden thing, and most recently, a detective story,” (harper, 2001) fits very naturally into the philosophy of interpretation, the philosophy devoted to the humble and reverent study of the endless interpretability of the life-world. “mystery” is a rejoinder of the tendency toward positivism in the human/psychological/social sciences, a way of thinking that finds certainty in its knowledge claims through the reduction of the contamination of human complexity and through the disavowal of any kinship between the researcher and the studied (jardine, 1998). it is this positivism that can turn a concept like slow learner, arguably a useful tentative description of a certain style of academic struggle potentially leading to a set of assistive possibilities to explore in practice into a categorical enclosure that entraps student, his or her school career, and the staff that work with this student (mehan, herweck, & meihls, 1986). remarking on the difference between the interpretive and positivistic way of thinking, ricoeur scholar, blundel (2010), has noted a problem can be laid in front of me and examined at my leisure. a mystery on the other hand is something in which i am unavoidably implicated. it is not laid out in front of me but rather encompasses me in such a way that i find myself inside of it. (p. 60) this novelization also sought to integrate the philosophy of the hard-boiled detective with a hermeneutic appreciation of mystery. this is not a difficult integration as the concept of “hardboiled” functions not so much as an addition to hermeneutic thought, but more as a tool with which to affect a slight dusting off of hermeneutics to reveal something that was elemental all along. hard-boiled detective took a genre that had previously been characterized by quaint, though often well crafted, puzzle games that did little to speak to the deeper human experience or challenge the existing social order (williamson & field, 2014), and adjusted its outlook to reveal corruption, inequity, moral complexity, and something dark, tragic, and ultimately unknowable beneath all the provisional case resolutions. similarly, as caputo (1987) has reminded us, the function of hermeneutics is not to make our problems easier to deal with, like a benign and forgettable detective story might distract us from the worries of the day or like the reduction of teaching to a few sterilely understood techniques might distract us from pondering our awesome responsibilities as educators, but to “offer a reading of life…that restores life to its original difficulty” (p.1). beyond those which i that have already described, we will leave the reader to discover which hard-boiled difficulties related to this topic that the work unconceals. one thing i can reveal without spoiling any of the surprises, however, is something unexpected, and hard-boiled, that happened to me after i completed the work. i had during most of the writing held my topic, the category of “slow learner” in some ambivalence, thinking that even as it did not provide access to formal services, and even as it did sometimes result in self-fulfilling prophesies, that it at least pointed concerned educators in the direction of some students who needed support. but during my oral examination i was asked if the category “slow learner” held any continuing relevance in conversations about supporting students, inclusively, in alberta’s schools. before i knew it, i williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 4 heard myself saying “no” and then providing an explanation that i do not remember the details of but that an exam committee member told me basically suggested i’d like to see the category “blown up/destroyed.” like the leaps that detectives make, how and when i came to this intuition is still a mystery to me. while i had thought that during this journey i might discover many things to confirm my ambivalence about the label, i could not have predicted that, in the words of gadamer (2004), beyond my “wanting and doing” (p. xxvi), this work would lead me to this realization. i remain curious if readers will feel similarly. this hard-boiled intuition certainly has not made life any easier for me, as i continue to witness this label function as a currency in schools. a note on rigor researchers considering non-traditional approaches to presenting applied hermeneutic phenomenological research may be interested to note that, at least in my case, the approach called us toward rigor instead of away from it. a part of this was simply the pragmatic urgency to fight the inevitable perception that a member of the supervisory committee expressed memorably and candidly when he warned that readers might develop the prejudice that this “was just screwing around with a detective story.” beyond this, however, the two masters of hermeneutics and hardboiled mystery writing constantly pulled me in the direction of finding more difficulty, more messiness, and more uneasy interpretability in “the case of the appearing/disappearing slow learner.” from january of 2011 when i first arrived at the idea of approaching the research this way to april of 2015 when it was submitted, i researched, wrote, and rewrote this novelization in daily writing sessions, often experienced as grueling. in terms of sources, hard-boiled hermeneutics pushed me to interview eight teachers, administrators, or curriculum leaders, and twice interview a small class of four students who were labelled as slow learners. i drew on 18 years of experiential data as a teacher as well as experiential data from being a student with a learning disability and parent of a child with a disability. i studied disability history going back to medieval times, 100 years of programing for slow learners in alberta, and the most current (at the time) educational reforms in alberta and their relationship to slow learners and inclusive education. i reviewed and interpreted depictions of slow learners in popular media including the films forrest gump, and being there, and the novel lottery and read all the primary texts (alberta education documents, manuals for teachers, psychology texts) i could access about the supposed characteristics and needs of slow learners as well as related disabilities including learning disabilities and intellectual disabilities. heidegger (1962) and gadamer (2004) have both reminded us that a complete view of any scene is never possible, in part because different vantages unconceal different phenomenon, but i would like to think that at least from the vantages this particular approach provided that i, like the gumshoes in the novels that inspired me, left relatively few stones unturned. how the novelization works the narrative strategy used to present the research in this novelization involves depicting a version of myself, exploring my true concerns with exaggerated angst, in the role of a special education coordinator who hires a detective to find this category of students that the narrative claims have been lost. i explored my more critical side through the character of the incredulous detective, who plays the role of the provocateur, making observations and asking questions about williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 5 educational categorization, disability, and bureaucratic process. additional characters include informants to my research, whose names, indeed, have been changed, even as i tried to faithfully represent their actual beliefs about, and roles in, the educational drama of slow learners. it is with less verisimilitude that i, under their real names, people the story with various writers and thinkers who have guided my quest. by and large, the thoughts they express on this topic are my own hermeneutic appropriations – applications of their philosophy to topics they did not have opportunity to comment on more directly. additional characters include villainous personifications of the toxic institutional discourses and practices that i claim have led to the disappearance of slow learners. as mentioned, the story is written to, as closely as possible, resemble a hard-boiled detective fiction novel. to preserve narrative flow, there is an avoidance of parenthetical references, instead opting for footnoting to acknowledge the intellectual property of sources, demonstrate the robustness of the research, and, occasionally, to provide more elaboration on a particular theme than the action of the narrative would allow. whether the reader approaches these footnotes as a part of the first reading of the narrative, or reviews them later, i hope that they provide adequate conversation of the research that guided the interpretations of the larger narrative. publication and serialization when i began to explore the possibilities for finding an appropriate publisher for my work, the journal of applied hermeneutics stood out to me because of its history of publishing eclectic and often provocative hermeneutic scholarship. since its inaugural issue in 2011, this journal has provided readers the opportunity to engage with the theorizing of esteemed hermeneutic philosophers such as richard kearney and nicholas davey, leaders in the enterprise of bringing the wisdom of hermeneutics into professional practice such as david jardine and nancy moules, and a very wide range of intriguing applications of hermeneutics (for e.g., discourses of dementia, hermeneutic understandings of oncology, the value of specialized summer camps for children with cancer, genuine school inclusion of students with diagnosed behavioral disabilities, first nations education, and applications of buddhism to nursing). feeling that it might be overwhelming to the reader to open and engage with an entire novel, replete with academic footnotes, all at once, especially considering that readers often engage with digital copies of the journal’s articles, i considered the possibility of releasing it in several editions. i have always been intrigued with the victorian tradition of serialized novels and how it mirrored my own experiences as a child (before technologies allowed for binge watching) awaiting new episodes of my favourite television shows, particularly the “cliff hangers” that usually marked the end of one season and the painful wait for the next. i have also had similar feelings awaiting new releases of my favourite film franchises, and, returning more closely to the subject at hand, the newest novels by my favourite hard-boiled detective fiction authors, with the fresh hard-boiled dilemmas these works are sure to place in the familiar, oft put upon, character. with the advent of on-line technologies, i have learned that the serialized novel is experiencing something of a re-emergence. its popularity is coming from the ground up with amateur writers of fan fiction realizing unparalleled popularity with their serialized releases (streitfield, 2014), but also in new forms such as the serialized web comic homestuck, which is garnering millions of followers as well as favorable critical comparison to ulysses for its depth and complexity williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 6 (knode, 2012). additionally several prominent publishers are exploring serialized publication for their latest novels (alter, 2013). i proposed the possibility of a serialized release to the journal’s editor and was honored when this idea was favorably received. in a further innovation, dr. moules suggested we seek out the scholars from my committee, all important voices in applied hermeneutics or disability studies, and inquire if they would be interested in writing editorial introductions to frame and contextualize each new release. i was elated when all of them agreed, and feel that the commentaries these scholars will provide are as much cause for excitement and anticipation as the various parts of the novelization. a warning brace yourself for this journey. as detective max hunter remarks the mystery of the appearing/disappearing slow learner was, and is, a messy case and one that requires hard-boiled resilience. the world of educational classification can be dark and, in its own way, violent. be careful, however, not to become too hard-boiled as readers. the best operatives realize that, though it makes for greater suffering, a keen sense of empathy is not a weakness; it is an essential tool of the trade. there are, after all, missing persons to find. note from journal of applied hermeneutics editor, dr. nancy moules it is with excitement and the experience of privilege that we welcome the work of dr. john williamson in presenting his doctoral thesis in “instalments” in the journal, trusting that we capture the integrity of the mystery and rigor of his important doctoral research. this work won the 2015 university of calgary chancellor’s graduate medal. in future instalments as we engage in this hermeneutic mystery, we will offer, as editorial comment, reflections from the scholars who informed and vetted this work. references alter, a. (2013). the return of the serial novel. the wall street journal. retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/sb10001424127887324020504578396742330033344. armstrong, f. (2002). the historical development of special education: humanitarian rationality or “wild profusion of entangled events”. history of education, 31(5), 437-456. blundel, b. (2010). paul ricoeur between theology and philosophy: detour and return. bloomington, in: indiana university press caputo, j.d. (1987). radical hermeneutics: repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. bloomington, in: indiana university press. couture, j.c. (2012). inclusion alberta’s educational palimpsest. ata magazine. 92(3). davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: suny. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 7 norton, j.d. (2005). chasing a beam of light: einstein's most famous thought experiment. john d. norton. retrieved from http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/goodies/chasing_the_light/index.html gadamer, h-g. (2004). truth and method. (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). london, uk: continuum. gilham, c. (2013). the hermeneutics of inclusion. unpublished doctoral thesis. university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. retrieved from http://theses.ucalgary.ca/handle/11023/828. gough, n. (2008). narrative experiments and imaginative inquiry. south african journal of education, 28, 335-349. graham, l., & slee, r. (2008). an illusory interiority: interrogating the discourse/s of inclusion. educational philosophy and theory, 40(2), 277-293. mystery. (n.d.). in online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=mystery heidegger, m. (1962). being and time. (j.macquarrie & e. robinson trans.) new york, ny: harper collins. jardine, d. (1998). awakening from descartes nightmare: on the love of ambiguity in phenomenological approaches to education. in to dwell with a boundless heart: essays in curriculum theory, hermeneutics and the ecological imagination. new york, ny: peter lang. knode, m. (2012). homestuck is the first great work of internet fiction. tor.com. retrieved from http://www.tor.com/2012/09/18/homestuck-is-the-first-great-work-of-internet-fiction/ mehan, h., herweck, a., & meihls, j. (1986). handicapping the handicapped. stanford, ca: standford university press. mytvmemories (january 18, 2012) “ dragnet – the big winchester, from the nbc television episode first broadcast by march 4, 1954” retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4ju-9. singer, p. (2009). the life you can save. new york, ny: random house. srour, m. (2013). frankenstein: a novel every biologist should read. teaching biology. retrieved from http://bioteaching.com/frankenstein-a-novel-every-biologist-should-read/. streitfield, d. (2014). web fiction, serialized and social. the new york times. retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/technology/web-fiction-serialized-and-social.html?_r=0. williamson, w.j., & field, j.c. (2014). the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 8 interpretive mystery. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 4. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy53b5wq7 microsoft word laingfinal.docx corresponding author: catherine m. laing email: cmlaing@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics june 16, 2112 the author(s) 2012 in play, at play catherine m. laing abstract it is surprising for many people to learn how restricted children with cancer are, both in their daily activities as well as in the bigger, more significant events in their lives. the treatment for cancer often leaves children with significant immune suppression; exposure to any kind of virus or infection could lead to a life-threatening event. summer camp – a “rite of passage” for many kids – would be a forgone experience were it not for specialized children’s cancer camps. this paper is intended to interpretively examine the concept of play in relation to children’s cancer camps. much has been written about play both philosophically and scientifically, and while it might seem an obvious association, play and camp, i would suggest that like the word itself there is more complexity in this relationship than what first appears obvious. children play at camp, of course, but there is much “at play” in them when they attend camp. as gadamer (1960/1989) wrote, “something is going on…something is happening” (p. 104). keywords cancer camp, philosophical hermeneutics, play, the word “play” is deceptively ordinary. it likely conjures images of children, games, or a dramatic performance, however almost 100 definitions and idioms exist in reference to this word. we can play and be played, something can be at play or come into play, we can watch a play, play with words, play around, make a play for, or play along. play is “complex and slippery” (brown, 1998, p. 243) because the more one looks into, under, and behind the word, the more one discovers its history, roots, uses, and meanings. as a noun, play is defined as the conduct, course, or action of a game, or a recreational activity (merriam-webster, 2012). as a verb, it means to engage in sport or recreation; to move aimlessly about; or, to perform music or to act in a dramatic production (merriam-webster). etymologically, the origins of play are unknown but thought to come from old english plegian (verb), to exercise, frolic, perform music, and plæga (noun), recreation, exercise, any brisk activity (online etymology dictionary, 2012). throughout its etymological history, “play” has been closely connected to the world of children and make believe and has generally stayed true to its primary meaning (online etymology dictionary). much has been written about play both laing journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 6 2 philosophically (e.g., gadamer, 1960/1989) and scientifically (e.g., bjorkland & pellegrini, 2000; brown, 1998, 2009) to the extent that there now exists institutes and university programs devoted to the study of play. in this paper, i do not intend to comprehensively cover the vast literature on play, rather the intent is to interpretively examine the concept of play in relation to children’s cancer camps. it might seem an obvious association, play and camp, however i would suggest that like the word itself there is more complexity in this relationship than what first appears obvious. children play at camp, of course, but there is much “at play” in them when they attend camp. as gadamer wrote, “something is going on…something is happening” (1960/1989, p. 104). much of my interpretation will be rooted in philosophical hermeneutics as developed by the german philosopher hans-georg gadamer. it is important to note, before further discussion, what gadamer meant by play. gadamer’s work was written in german and later translated to english, and while play (the verb) and game (the noun), are different words in english, in german, it is the same word (e.g., play a game, ein spiel spielen). play, from a gadamerian perspective, is not about games per se, but rather more about what miller (1996) described as “leeway.” miller recounted a story of himself as a young academic under the mentorship of gadamer. he recalled asking the philosopher, “what is the point of play?” gadamer asked me if i rode a bicycle. i said that i did. then he asked me about the front wheel, the axle, and the nuts. he remarked that i probably knew that it was important not to tighten the nuts too tightly, else the wheel could not turn. "it has to have some play!" he announced pedagogically and a little exultantly, i thought. and then he added,” . . . and not too much play, or the wheel will fall off.” (conclusion section, para. 4) a leeway is an allowable margin of freedom or variation; the amount of freedom to move or act that is available (merriamwebster, 2012). perhaps it could be said that the intent of this paper then, is to explore the margins of freedom and variation to move and act to play that children have at cancer camp; to examine the space between where their restrictive lives at the hospital and home end, and where their lives at camp begin. playing at camp from a philosophical perspective i have memories of cancer camp watching these kids i knew so well outside of the hospital environment, some of who were at one point sicker than i care to remember in great detail, some whose number of days in hospital neared the number of days out of hospital, some who have since passed away. these memories (in italics) are disorienting cocktails of emotion and wonder, holding place cards in my mind of significant points in time. all are being utilized to illustrate the concept of play. i you could hear them coming before you could see them. the thundering clamor of the buses rolling along the bumpy dirt road leading to camp, and the voices, the cheering, the songs (a warbling hybrid of several, it seemed), the exuberation – all as if to say “we’re finally here!” as the buses turned the corner and the camp came into view, the promise of the week ahead took over any remaining restraint and the sound became deafening. one by one they exited the bus until a sea of bald heads, broviacs, and feeding tubes filled the empty, waiting space of camp. there was no mistaking – these kids were here to play. laing journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 6 3 play, according to gadamer (1960/1989), is not to be understood as something someone does, rather the structure of play absorbs the player into itself, freeing them from the burden of initiating play. it is movement without purpose or goal, renewing itself through repetition and absorbing the player into its movement. gadamer offered that it is only when a player loses him/herself in play that the purpose of play is fulfilled. play is not a disengaged exercise of subjectivity, rather it is something that has its own order and structure to which one is given over. it is not to be thought of as an object upon which a player (or spectator) acts, nor can it be understood as a subjectively determined activity. gadamer (1960/1989) maintained that "play is really limited to presenting itself. thus its mode of being is selfpresentation” (p. 108). it was interesting to watch the children exit the bus, some knowing what they were in for, others riding the wave of their peers’ excitement. there was an element of them “being taken over,” entering into a moment beyond their control – one in which they did not initiate or intend to enter – rather, it just happened to them. it was the beginning of something happening, something was at play here and looking back upon it, through this particular lens of philosophical hermeneutics, i can now see this moment differently. i can see the to and fro-ness of this moment, not from a game perspective, but from a losing of oneself to a moment, over and over, perspective. the children did not arrive at camp intending to absorb themselves, and fulfill the purpose of play by “losing themselves” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 102). rather, “over and above their wanting and doing” (p. xxviii) they entered into the margins of freedom and variation to move and act that they did not experience in their day to day life the leeway, the play of things. something was clearly at play. ii i watched her make her way up the ladder to the giant swing and giggled nervously. she was scared, you could tell. well, i could tell, because it was the same look she would get when i had to inject l’asparaginase into her thigh. i had seen that look 24 times, we counted one day. she was strapped into a climbing harness so i knew there was no way she could get hurt, but i’m not sure she knew that. the other kids, sensing her trepidation, buoyed her on with cheers of “you can do it!” and “you’re almost there!” finally, the countdown, “3…2…1…go!” and the swing was released, sending her on a giant arc back and forth through space and time, her face awash with exuberant bliss. central to gadamer’s (1960/1989) notion of play is the back and forth-ness, the “to and fro motion” (p. 104), where “what characterizes this movement back and forth is that neither pole of the movement represents the goal in which it would come to rest” (gadamer, 1986, p. 22). play appears as movement without purpose or end point, renewing itself through repetition. it takes on the burden of initiative, absorbing the player into its movement. play exists "to play." the giant swing, going back and forth with a momentum of its own, requiring no initiation or continuation to keep going on the part of the swinger, brings to mind gadamer’s (1960/1989) notion of the to and fro of play. “the structure of play absorbs the player into itself” (p. 105), however as mccaffrey, raffin bouchal, and moules (in press) noted, “there has to be more than one player, and there is a to-and-fro movement between players with a spontaneity and creativity in the motion of the play” (p. 12). this additional player can be metaphorical. what gadamer is referring to is that, in order for play to occur, something needs to respond to the person playing. it can laing journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 6 4 be a person catching a ball that has been thrown by another, or it can be the giant swing responding to the girl’s desire to swing. in some cases, as in rilke’s poem that is the epitaph in gadamer’s (1960/1989) truth and method, a person is drawn into a game, into play, without initiative or intention. catch only what you’ve thrown yourself, all is mere skill and little gain; but when you’re suddenly the catcher of a ball thrown by an eternal partner with accurate and measured swing towards you, to your center, in an arch from the great bridgebuilding of god: why catching then becomes a power – not yours, a world’s. (cited in gadamer, p. v) being “the catcher of a ball thrown by an eternal partner” illustrates the nature of being drawn into play without initiation. when we are engaged, we lose our subjectivity and become “played” by the game, subject, or conversation within which we are engaged. we do not consciously think, “here i am and i am caught up in this game” that awareness is lost. we have let go of ourselves being the ones responsible for conducting the way it goes. it is a curious thing, to consider what it is that gets lost when you lose yourself in something. when children are at cancer camp, i wonder if, when they lose themselves in play, they paradoxically find something else. perhaps with this losing of themselves, they are finding acceptance, joy, and confidence. iii “1, 2, 3, a-larry…” i hadn’t heard that rhyme since elementary school. no, before that. i thought it was “one of those songs” my mother had taught me, dating back (as far as i was concerned) to the olden days. “4, 5, 6, alarry…” while i knew the song, the game had changed i was trying hard to figure out these new rules. four kids were passing three balls among each other at increasing rates of speed seemingly trying to get each other to drop the ball. who knows the point, really, that’s irrelevant. i became comfortable with the mystery of it. “7, 8, 9, a-larry…” they seemed so engrossed in what they were doing, so serious. they didn’t hear the dinner bell ringing or the cacophony of general camp noise. they were taken over by the game. “10, a-larry catch me!” “play fulfills its purpose only if the player loses himself in play” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 102). gadamer noted that there is a seriousness to play that is required to make the play “wholly play” (p. 102). this seriousness, however, belongs to the play itself versus to the player. gadamer reminded us many times that the players are not the subject of play; “instead play merely reaches presentation through the players” (p.103). movement as such is the essence of play, which has no goal but constantly renews and repeats itself. there is a primacy of the game over the players and of the play over the consciousness of the player (gallagher, 1992). as such, it is not the player who plays the game, rather the game plays the player: “(a)ll playing is being played. the attraction of a game, the fascination it exerts, consists precisely in the fact that the game masters the players” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 106). this dominance of play over the consciousness of the player is easy to see when you look for it. i see it in my 2 year old when she plays “pretend”; i notice it in myself after the fact of being engrossed in a game, and i realize now that was what i was witnessing when i watched the game the children were playing at cancer camp. they were playing but there was also something at play in them. laing journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 6 5 i feel the need to name this to figure out what it is that is at play during these moments in these children. surrender, transcendence, giving-over, and vulnerability are all words that come to mind, however these words do not entirely capture what i think is happening, what is at play. perhaps gadamer would say the point is to realize that there is something at play here, and correctly naming it is not the spirit of hermeneutics. it is not about being right, rather hermeneutics is about finding an interpretation that is true of something. like art, play, and games share a to and fro movement not bound to a specific goal other than fulfilling themselves (gadamer, 1960/1989). it is what occurs when the game is in play that matters. over and above their wanting and doing, the player is taken over by the play which has no purpose other than to bring something forth (gadamer, 1960/1989). iv they were deep in conversation, it seemed. i don’t know what they were talking about but it was fun to watch them as they sat on the picnic table in their own world despite being amidst the chaos of camp. in my mind, i imagined they were discussing their diseases, how they were managing chemo, what it was like to be teenage girls without hair. in reality it was probably something much more “normal” than that boys or clothes, maybe. their expressions changed as they took turns being the speaker and the listener, and each seemed to take the role of listener very seriously. more serious than most teenage girls do, i think. i couldn’t help wondering, for the rest of that day, what were they talking about? gadamer (1960/1989) used the concepts of conversation and play to describe the dialogical nature of understanding. in comparing understanding with acts of dialogue and play, gadamer suggested that the process of question and answer, listening and speaking, and seeing others’ points of view enable us to reach new understandings (spence, 2005). when in a genuine dialogue with another, we try to understand how what the other person is saying could be right (gadamer, 1996). in a genuine conversation the concern is with the subject matter and with its possible truth (warnke, 1987). neither participant claims to know the truth, rather each is open to the other’s views. “thus, being in the play of different understanding makes possible a movement, on the part of the players, towards ways of knowing that extend beyond their current understandings” (spence, 2001, p. 627). watching the girls in conversation, the cadence of their dialogue having a visible, almost predictable “back and forth-ness” to it, draws attention to gadamer’s analogy of play having a dynamic and influx nature (spence, 2001). “the naturalness of the movement, the immanently dialectical relationships and the process of playing out possibilities” (spence, 2001, p. 627) has me play with the possibility that that is exactly what was really happening with these girls. perhaps they were playing with possibilities, trying on each others views, listening to hear if what the other was saying was true of something for them, or coming to new understandings. whether their conversation was “genuine” or “hermeneutic” in nature i cannot be sure. i can be sure, however, that in the back and forth, and to and fro-ness of their dialogue, something was at play. playing at camp from a scientific perspective v i remember the first time it dawned on me that kids with cancer don’t have the same kinds of childhoods as healthy children. you would think that would have been obvious but it didn’t occur to me until a few months into working with them. i overheard one mother laing journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 6 6 telling another about how much fun her child had at camp the previous year, and how much he was looking forward to the upcoming camp. “it was just so nice for him to do normal stuff, you know? like healthy kids. for once he wasn’t missing out on anything.” it is surprising for many people to learn how restricted children with cancer are, both in their daily activities as well as in the bigger, more significant events in their lives. the treatment for cancer often leaves children with significant immune suppression, meaning exposure to any kind of virus or infection could lead to a life-threatening event. pediatric cancer programs teach parents how and when to limit their child’s activities and exposure to others, and many families find their times of restriction far outweigh their times of freedom. school, social events, and birthdays are only some of the activities often missed because of their disease. summer camp (for healthy children) is another opportunity these children could never conceivably attend due to the risk of exposure to infection and also because of their associated medical complexities (e.g., central lines) that require care and attention. summer camp a “rite of passage” for many kids would be a forgone experience were it not for these specialized cancer camps. the importance of cancer camps can be further substantiated by what is known about play from the scientific community. “play, more than any other activity, fuels healthy development of children and, the continued healthy development of adults” (perry, hogan, & marlin, 2000, para.5). our bodies, minds, and words are all involved in play, and while the nature and complexity changes as a child grows, at the heart of play is pleasure and a powerful desire to repeat such activities (perry et al., 2000). it is through this repetition that mastery occurs, leading to accomplishment and self-confidence. from a neuro-developmental perspective, play is the building block to learning. we learn through repetition, and because of the desire to repeatedly engage in play, all learning emotional, social, motor, and cognitive – is fueled by the pleasure of play (perry et al., 2000). piaget (1962) proposed that it is through cooperative, social play that moral reasoning develops. the concept of play has been the focus of many research studies examining its effects on memory (greenough & black, 1992), growth of brain cells (gordon, burke, akil, watson, & panskepp, 2003; huber, tonini, & cirelli, 2007), intelligence (bjorkland & pellegrini, 2000; pellegrini & holmes, 2006; stevenson & lee, 1990), language (fisher, 1999; lewis, boucher, lupton, & watson, 2000), problem-solving (pepler & ross 1981; wyver & spence 1999), and mathematic abilities (wolfgang, stannard, & jones, 2001). children and adolescents lack the ability to communicate complex feelings through language. landreth (2002) wrote that because children’s language development lags behind their cognitive development, their ability to communicate complex feelings is best done through play. emotions such as frustration, sympathy, and ambivalence are difficult for them to express because of their concrete view of the world (landreth, 2001). playing allows for the expression of these emotions. play has biological, cultural, social, and psychological functions (landreth, 2001), and is considered of such importance that it is used as a therapeutic modality (called play therapy) in pediatric hospitals around the world. mcmahon (2003) wrote “we need to play…play is not a mindless filling of time or a rest from work. it is a spontaneous and active process in which thinking, feeling and doing can flourish since they are separated from the fear of failure or disastrous consequences” (p. 197). failing and disastrous conlaing journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 6 7 sequences are what children with cancer live with every day. play provides not only an escape from their disease but a way in which they can continue along the journey of being a child, learning what is required of them, mastering what they need to, and finding enjoyment along the way. gadamer (1996) stated that it is only through experiencing illness that we understand health. i would further this idea to mean that sometimes we can arrive at understandings though the negative understanding what is because of what is not. perhaps examining the absence of play playlessness could help to further the understanding of what is at play in children who attend cancer camp. brown (2009) offered a metaphor comparing play to oxygen “it’s all around us, yet goes mostly unnoticed or unappreciated until it is missing” (p. 6). his team’s research into violent criminals (most notably charles whitman, the texas tower mass murderer) found that “normal play behavior was virtually absent throughout the lives of highly violent, anti-social men, regardless of demographic” (p. 249). similarly, goodall (1986) wrote of the murder cannibalism by gombe female chimpanzees, noting that chimps displaying this rare behavior were ineffectively mothered, with early play and later socialization patterns constricted. it would indeed be a stretch to say that children with cancer, deprived of play, will become adults with violent tendencies, but as brown (2009) noted: i now perceive healthy varied play in childhood as necessary for the development of empathy, social altruism and the possession of a repertoire of social behaviors enabling the player to handle stress, particularly humiliation and powerlessness. i also have found that general wellbeing and play are partners, and that it accompanies the most gifted in their adult achievements: perhaps it allows access to the giftedness we all possess. (p. 250) perhaps it is more responsible to say that children with cancer who are deprived of play because of the limitations of their disease may not be getting the same chances as their peers to learn the skills they will need in adulthood, to learn about themselves and others, and to reach their full potential. some may defy the odds and do it anyway but i wonder, why would we take that chance? conclusion benner (1994) suggested that the understanding gained in interpretive inquiry is key to “becoming more effectively, skillfully, or humanely engaged in practice” (p. xv) and is a particularly useful approach when seeking to understand things that are taken for granted or assumed. play, i believe, is one of those taken for granted things. it is all around us, until it is not. like oxygen, its absence is noticed, not its presence. while this interpretive analysis was done without data or text generated through research, it has not been ex nihilo. my memories of camp and practice, combined with the lens of philosophical hermeneutics and other play research, illuminate the concept of play in such a way as to further the understanding of this concept (play) in this setting (cancer camp). i have likely not answered the question of exactly what is at play in these children when they attend camp, but it is my hope that this comes to light with my upcoming research. one dimension of play that i have not addressed in this paper but warrants consideration nonetheless is that of the ethics of play. vilhauer (2010) addressed this, noting that (p)lay has a global relevance in philosophical hermeneutics…play elucidates laing journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 6 8 the very process of understanding in general the understanding which stretches through all our hermeneutic experience, including our encounters with art, with text, with tradition in all its forms, with others in dialogue, and which even constitutes our very mode of being in the world. (pp. xiii-xiv) the ethics of play, according to gadamer (summarized by vilhauer), have three considerations. first, there are ethical conditions that must be met for genuine dialogue to succeed. second, there is an implicit value claim in gadamer’s work that genuine play is ultimately beneficial to our development as human beings. third, gadamer’s theory of understanding as a process of play is meant as practical philosophy to guide us in relations with others so that we may understand better. while beyond the scope of this paper, it is perhaps worth consideration for future researchers to address the ethics of play with respect to children with serious illness. gadamer (1960/1989) stated that "hermeneutic work is based on a polarity of familiarity and strangeness... the true locus of hermeneutics is this in-between" (p. 295). it is fitting to think of play as existing in this “inbetween,” in the margins and leeway of familiarity and strangeness. in many ways, it is in the in-between that children and their families exist once they receive the diagnosis of childhood cancer. i believe it behooves those of us interested in working with these families to find ways to make it easier to live in this liminal space. we are no longer able to approach this like an object of knowledge, grasping, measuring and controlling. rather than meeting us in our world, it is much more a world into which we ourselves are drawn. [it] possesses its own worldliness and, thus, the center of its own being so long as it is not placed into the object-world of producing and marketing. the being of this thing cannot be accessed by objectively measuring and estimating; rather, the totality of a lived context has entered into and is present in the thing. and we belong to it as well. our orientation to it is always something like our orientation to an inheritance that this thing belongs to, be it from a stranger’s life or from our own. (gadamer, 1994, p. 192) references benner, p.e. (1994). interpretive phenomenology: embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness. thousand oaks, ca: sage publications, inc. bjorkland, d.f., & pellegrini, a.d. (2000). child development and evolutionary psychology. child development, 71, 1687-1708. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00258 brown, s. (1998). play as an organizing principle: clinical evidence and personal observations. in m. bekoff & j.a. beyer (eds.), animal play: evolutionary, comparative, and ecological perspectives (pp. 242-251). boston, ma: cambridge university press. brown, s. (2009). play: how it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. new york, ny: penguin group inc. fisher, e. p. (1992). the impact of play on development: a meta-analysis. play and culture, 5(2), 159-181. gadamer, h. g. (1960/1989). truth and method. (2nd rev. ed., j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york: continuum. gadamer, h.g. (1986). the relevance of the beautiful and other essays (n. walker, trans.) boston, ma: cambridge university press. laing journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 6 9 gadamer, h.g. (1994). heidegger’s ways (j.w. staley, trans.). albany, ny: state university press. gadamer, h.g. (1996). the enigma of health. stanford, ca: stanford university press. gallagher, s. (1992). hermeneutics and education. new york, ny: state university press. goodall, j. (1986). the chimpanzees of gombe. cambridge, ma: belknap press of harvard university press. gordon, n.s., burke, s., akil, h., watson, s.j., & panskepp, j. (2003). socially-induced brain ‘fertilization’: play promotes brain derived neurotrophic factor transcription in the amygdala and dorsolateral frontal cortex in juvenile rats. neuroscience letters, 341(1), 17-20. doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00158-7 greenough, w.t., & black, j.e. (1992). induction of brain structure by experience: substrates for cognitive development. in m.r. gunnar, & c.a. nelson (eds.), minnesota symposia on child psychology: developmental neuroscience (155-200). hillside, nj: lawrence a erlbaum associates. huber, r., tonini, g., & cirelli, c. (2007). exploratory behavior, cortical bdnf expression, and sleep homeostasis. sleep, 30(2), 129-139. retrieved from http://www. journalsleep.org /articles/300202.pdf landreth, g. (2001). innovations in play therapy. new york, ny: brunner-routledge. landreth, g. (2002). play therapy: the art of the relationship (2nd edition). new york, ny: brunner-routledge. lewis, p., boucher, j., lupton, l., & watson, s. (2000). relationships between symbolic play, functional play, verbal and non-verbal ability in young children. international journal of language and communication disorders, 35(1), 117-127. doi:10.1080/ 136828200247287 mccaffrey, g., raffin bouchal, s., & moules, (in press). hermeneutics as a research approach: a reappraisal. international journal of qualitative methods. mcmahon, l. (2003). the handbook of play therapy. london, uk: routledge. miller, d.l. (1996). the bricoleur in the tennis court: pedagogy in postmodern context. retrieved february 22, 2012 from http://www.imaginalinstitute.com/bricoleur.ht m pellegrini, a.d., & holmes, r.m. (2006). the role of recess in primary school. in d. singer, r. golinkoff, & k. hirsh-pasek (eds.), play=learning: how play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and socioemotional growth. new york, ny: oxford university press. pepler, d.j., & ross, h.s. (1981). the effects of play on convergent and divergent problem solving. child development, 52(4), 12021210. retrieved from http://www.jstor. org/stable/1129507 perry, b.d., hogan, l., & marlin, s.j. (2000). curiosity, pleasure and play: a neurodevelopmental perspective. haaeyc advocate. retrieved from www.childtrauma.org piaget, j. (1962). play, dreams and imitation in childhood. new york, ny: norton. play. (n.d.). etymonline.com. retrieved february 20, 2012 from http://www.ety monline.com/index.php?term=playplay. (n.d.). merriam-webster dictionary. retrieved february 16, 2012 from http://www. merriamwebster.com/dictionary/play laing journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 6 10 spence, d.g. (2001). hermeneutic notions illuminate cross-cultural nursing experiences. journal of advanced nursing, 35(4), 624-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01879.x spence, d.g. (2005). hermeneutic notions augment cultural safety education. journal of nursing education, 44(9), 409-414. retrieved from http://www.slack journals.com/jne stevenson, h.w., & lee, s.y. (1990). contexts of achievement: a study of american, chinese, and japanese children. monographs of the society for research in child development. 55(1-2), 1-123. retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1166090 vilhauer, m. (2010). gadamer’s ethics of play: hermeneutics and the other. plymouth, uk: lexington books. warnke, g. (1987). gadamer: hermeneutics, tradition and reason. stanford, ca: stanford university press. wolfgang, c.h., stannard, l. l., & jones, i. (2001). block play performance among preschoolers as a predictor of later school achievement in mathematics. journal of research in childhood education, 15(2), 173180. doi:10.1080/02568540109594958 wyver, s.r., & spence, s.h. (1999). play and divergent problem solving: evidence supporting a reciprocal relationship. early education and development, 10(4), 419 – 444. doi: 10.1207/s15566935eed1004_1 acknowledgement: the author gratefully acknowledges the alberta children’s hospital foundation for their financial support of her doctoral study in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary microsoft word hodge corrected proof.docx corresponding author: nick hodge, edd email: n.s.hodge@shu.ac.uk journal of applied hermeneutics february 22, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 invited guest editorial lives worthy of life: the everyday resistance of disabled people nick hodge ‘spoiler alert’: this article speaks to that of dr. john williamson that is published in this years issue. i have made some effort to avoid revealing too much of the “plot” but those of you who prefer to enjoy the mystery of the disappearing/appearing slow learner as it is intended to unfold are advised to read williamson’s article before this one. i first encountered williamson’s work in the form of a phd thesis. i was captivated first by the concept, the originality of presenting research in the form of a detective novel. next by the beautiful artwork of emma williamson that adorns the cover and then once i began to read, as with every gripping thriller, i could not put it down. this work challenges fundamentally the expected form of the traditional social science thesis that nearly always starts with a context chapter followed by a review of the literature that gives rise to the research questions and then the methodology chapter and so on. all that i anticipated did not at first appear in this thesis and yet of course i then came to realise that it had been there all along: it had disappeared and then appeared again. lopez and willis (2004) called for researchers to be more explicit about their methodology to set out the philosophy and principles that inform and guide the study. max hunter is a bruised and cynical private detective who is in constant dialogue with himself and his client, williamson, the slightly worn down by the system but “hanging on in there” teacher. this creation of the detective is an inspired artifice. the discussions between the two characters allow williamson to lay out in detail before the reader every element of the research journey. we share each frustration and each wonder of discovery that happens within the research. in max, is embodied the very physicality of what it means to conduct a phd enquiry: the anxiety, the late nights sustained only by coffee, the trials of accessing participants, the compulsion to keep going no matter what, trying to appear like you know what you are doing when you have no idea where to go next, the confusion and uncertainty and the wondering whether any of it will ever come to hodge journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 2 2 mean anything. presenting research in the form of a novel reminds the reader that all reports on enquiry are constructed stories that are created and managed by the researcher. kvale (1996) argued that the job of the researcher is to make clear the links between the claims made and the evidence base that support them. then each reader must decide upon the reliability of research and evaluate to what extent he/she can recognise his/her own experience within it. i was a teacher in special education for many years before working at a university. for me, this research feels “real.” i recognise the teachers and the pupils who are “interviewed” by max and i can picture the spaces in which these meetings occur. the issues raised by staff and pupils are the ones that troubled me then in my practice as a teacher and continue to do so today. the work is made authentic for me through the level of detail provided, the reflections on the research journey expressed by max and williamson and i am convinced by the human but ethical natures of their characters as portrayed within the text. williamson is a very talented writer who is as at home constructing a novel as he is with more standard styles of academic writing. so this form of thesis would not work for every researcher but it has certainly highlighted for me the potential and value of thinking about ways of conducting and presenting research differently. this text encourages us to be creative and brave but above all reminds us of the need to be consistent, disciplined, and exact. in spite of not having specialist training nor undertaken a lengthy academic course max comes quickly to understand disability, something that some of those in education with many years of experience never seem to achieve. max is a “sucker for the underdogs” (p. 49), a freirean hero who is prepared to put himself at the disposal of others to expose the oppressive practices of the system (freire, 1970). max moves amongst those who have been expelled to the margins of society, constructed as non-producers, economic burdens on the capitalist state who are there and yet do not appear (sassen, 2014). max might not yet know about disability theory but he knows people. as a detective he researches the lived experiences of others. max listens and he considers. in the section of the story that williamson presents here, he sends in derrida and foucault to help max with understanding how the category of slow learner might have come to be formed and the role that the label serves in the regulation and limitation of children and young people. derrida and foucault take max to the “classification of disability research institute,” a private museum of disability history. so skilled is williamson as a writer that upon first reading about this museum i immediately tried to locate it on the internet in the hope that i could one day visit. it seemed to contain such important exhibits. immersed in the story, i ignored the clues that williamson provided to remind me that “everything is dangerous” (foucault, 1991, p. 343) and that we all need to remember to “watch our watching, to read our readings” (titchkosky, 2007, p. 3) as all may not be what at first it seems. the presence of derrida and foucault as max’s escorts around the exhibition or even the fictional nature of max himself perhaps should have warned me that there might not actually be a museum for me to visit but caught up in the drama i had let down my guard. when i realised my error the museum temporarily disappeared for me only to reappear in the form of all the research texts that have chartered the history of disability and which williamson has so thoroughly analysed. through the tour of the institute max comes to know the shocking and shameful history of disability. through photographs, personal accounts and “official” documentation max observes the systematic denial of the humanity of disabled people, dehumanisation through acts which mark out those who perpetrate them as well as those who suffer (freire, 1970). max learns that hodge journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 2 3 diagnosis, categorisation, and labelling “violently mark” and disable children and young people (goodley & runswick-cole, 2016, p. 1): labels are not the benevolent tools designed to support children and young people that many families and practitioners imagine them to be. instead they are revealed here as tools of the privileged within the capitalist state in order to contain (at best) and eradicate (at worst) those who are categorised as economic burdens on the state and polluters of the workforce (hodge, 2016). max witnesses how throughout history disabled people have been and are positioned as other and lesser. only the bodies that are capable of labour are deemed to have value; “not all bodies are equal, some matter more than others: some are, quite frankly, disposable” (braidotti, 2011, p. 216). disabled people are first cast as unfeeling “idiots (who) are insensitive to pain or temperature” (sward, 1917, p. 498) and then transmogrified into animals (williamson, 2016). zoomorphism serves to allow the maltreatment and expulsion of disabled people. animals can be dangerous beasts that need to be corralled and controlled and even destroyed if they do not earn their right to life or threaten the profit of a healthy gene pool. once disabled people are made animal, then the aktion t4 programme of nazi germany becomes possible. as max comes to learn, over 200,000 disabled children and adults were murdered through this programme in germany alone (seeman, 2005). stripped of their humanity these beasts and burdens were viewed by the nazis as “lives unworthy of life” (glass, 1999). max learns of these terrible accounts whilst in a museum. but euthanasia and eugenics have not yet been assigned to history. there is currently in development a fetal test for down syndrome that demonstrates the potential to be less intrusive and risky for pregnant women and their fetuses (gander, 2016). this was announced recently in the uk media with almost no challenge or protest even though the implications of the announcement are clear: more women are likely to access the test and more “lives unworthy of life” will be terminated. the conceptualisation of disabled people as beast and burden is equally persistent. this can be seen in the relentless vilification of disabled people in the united kingdom media as “shirkers and scroungers” (garthwaite, 2011, p. 369). a further example is the television documentary that presents dr. temple grandin, a highly respected academic who happens to identify with the label of autism, as “the woman who thinks like a cow” (bbc, 2006). as cattle are subject to inhumane forms of control such as electric prods to direct their movements, it is unsurprising that disabled children have been subject to the same practices as “tools” of learning (silberman, 2015). for max, the horrors to which he bears witness become unbearable and he feels compelled to leave the museum. the exhibits are brutal reminders of the devastating effects that the operation of power can have on lives made vulnerable. but within the history of disability can also be found hope and so the museum needs one more exhibit: the everyday resistance of disabled people. kitchin (1998, p. 353) defined resistance as “the opposition of power: the oppressed fighting back against the injustices imposed by their oppressors.” in the history of disability, kitchin recorded that such was the dominance of ableist ideology that by necessity acts of resistance by disabled people were for many years individual: actions range from living the lives they want, getting an education and a job, to having children, not hiding their ‘deformities’, rejecting ‘normalising’ treatment, battling against stereotypes and prejudice, and seeking to get ‘able-bodied’ people to accept them as they are… (p. 353) hodge journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 2 4 ryerson university hosts a virtual museum of disability activism and resistance. one exhibit captures examples of disability resistance in the stories of mathilda, audrey, and may. these three women were committed to the toronto hospital for the insane at the beginning of the 20th century and they remained there for most of their lives. without pay, they were compelled to work and it is estimated that between them they provided the state with 285000 hours of labour. effectively free “workhorses,” these women refused to be defined by their assigned status. instead, mathilda presented herself as an employee of the institute and asserted authority over her working space. may would wander the grounds of the institute in the early morning in spite of regulations that forbade it. women like these three resisted their oppression through pride in their work, forming communities and quiet subversion of oppressive regulations (stackhouse, n.d.). mcdonald, keys, and balcazar (2007), in more recent research with young disabled people, identified how they resist pejorative and disempowering cultural representations of disability. these include removing oneself from a negative environment and being selective about the spaces one inhabits. young people assert their authority to decide for themselves their identity and value regardless of how others appear to perceive them. they remind themselves of their worth through acts of positive thinking and turn potentially disempowering narratives into “prove them wrong” motivators that drive them on to achieve. other forms of resistance include fighting back verbally when encountering disabling attitudes from others and openly celebrating and highlighting one's “difference” (loja et al., 2013). in williamson’s research (2016), acts of resistance can be seen in colleen birdseye’s transcendence of her label (p. 3), the quiet but persistent challenge of the young man in asserting that his qualifications were of the required standard to register for an apprenticeship (pp. 4-5), arturo’s rejection of his assigned category and status (pp. 19-22) and the illustrations by the students of their talents in dance, sport, and juggling (p. 23). in the latter half of the 20th century, as part of a wider civil rights movement in some countries individual acts of resistance by disabled people developed into collective action (kitchin, 1998; köbsell, 2006; lord, 2010). in the uk in the 1970s, disabled people led the development of a new model of conceptualising and responding to ableist oppression: “the social model of disability” (oliver, 1996). this shifted the focus of disability away from individual impairment and on to the societal structures that impede the aspirations of people with impairments (goodley, 2011; mallett & runswick-cole, 2014). disabled people asserted new rights to decision making and placed themselves in positions of leadership within the organisations that represented them or started new groups of their own (leach, 1996). resistance to disability became more visible and demanded the attention of the world (köbsell, 2006). the exhibitions at the “classification of disability research institute” convey therefore the horror and shame of the dehumanisation of disabled people that has led to expulsion, confinement, and attempts at systematic eradication. what it does not capture is resistance and hope the refusal to submit to oppression by disabled people who assert their humanity within their everyday lives. williamson’s research and writing and his work as a teacher are also acts of resistance. like his hero max, williamson “doggedly” refuses to allow the slow learner to be expelled to the margins and made to disappear. instead williamson supports those labelled slow learners with telling their stories and thereby making known and validating their aspirations and the barriers that thwart them. disabled people and their allies continue to find new ways of hodge journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 2 5 challenging the insidious and omnipresent specters of ableism and normalcy. the digital age, for example, has provided a variety of creative platforms to capture and promote the lived experience of disabled people and represent the diversity and richness of these lives worthy of life (rice et al., 2015). in the uk, disabled performance artist liz crow drew attention to the crime of aktion t4 by sitting in a wheelchair, dressed as a nazi, on a plinth high above the crowds in london's trafalgar square (disability arts online, 2009). the continued attacks on disabled people by neoliberal-ableist governments that rob them of their incomes and deny them access to independent living mean that once again disabled people are corralled into large scale segregated living (goodley, lawthom, & runswick-cole, 2014; gradwell, 2015). all cities and towns require a history of disability museum that would record and display the shame of such practices, both past and current, but also celebrate the heroism of disabled people in resisting them. these museums would act as beacons of remembrance and a warning that we must all “watch our watching (and) read our readings” because “everything is dangerous.” references bbc. (2006). horizon documentary: the woman who thinks like a cow. first broadcast on 8 june 2006. braidotti, r. (2011). nomadic subjects: embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory (2nd ed.). new york, ny: columbia university press. disability arts online. (2009). news: liz crow reached the guardian’s ‘top 10 from trafalgar’ list. 12 december. accessed at http://www.disabilityartsonline.org.uk/liz-crow-reached-theguardian-top-10. foucault, m. (1991). ‘on the genealogy of ethics: an overview of work in progress’, interview with foucault. in p. rabinow (ed.) the foucault reader (pp. 340-372). london, uk: penguin. freire, p. (1970). pedagogy of the oppressed. london, uk: continuum. gander, k. (2016). down’s syndrome test which is ‘safer and highly accurate’ approved for pregnant women on nhs. independent, 15, january. accessed at http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/safer-highly-accuratedowns-syndrome-test-approved-for-pregnant-women-on-nhs-a6813731.html. garthwaite, k. (2011). ‘the language of shirkers and scroungers?’ talking about illness, disability and coalition welfare reform. disability & society, 26(3), 369-372. glass, j.m. (1999). life unworthy of life: racial phobia and mass murder in hitler’s germany. new york, ny: basic books. goodley, d. (2011). disability studies: an interdisciplinary introduction. london, uk: sage. hodge journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 2 6 goodley, d., lawthom, r., & runswick-cole, k. (2014). dis/ability and austerity: beyond work and slow death. disability & society, 29(6), 980-984. goodley, d., & runswick-cole, k. (2016). becoming dishuman: thinking about the human through dis/ability. discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 37(1), 1-15. gradwell, l. (2015). independent living fund from the sublime to the ridiculous? disability & society, 30(9), 1428-1433. hodge, n. (2016, forthcoming). schools without labels. in r. mallett, k. runswick-cole, & s. timimi (eds.), re-thinking autism. london, uk: jessica kingsley publishers. kitchen, r. (1998) ‘out of place’, ‘knowing one’s place’: space, power and the exclusion of disabled people. disability & society, 13(3), 343-356. köbsell, s. (2006) towards self-determination and equalization: a short history of the german disability rights movement. disability studies quarterly, 26(2), pages unnumbered. accessed at http://idis.uni-koeln.de/wp-content/uploads/kbsell.pdf kvale, s. (1996). interviews: an introduction to qualitative research. london, uk: sage. leach, b. (1996). disabled people and the equal opportunities movement. in g. hales (ed.), beyond disability: towards an enabling society (pp. 88-95). london, uk: the open university & sage. loja, e., costa, m.e., hughes, b., & menezes, i. (2013). disability, embodiment and ableism: stories of resistance. disability & society, 28(2), 190-203. lopez, k.a., & willis, d.g. (2004). descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: their contributions to nursing knowledge. qualitative healthcare research, 14(5), 726-735. lord, j. (2010). impact: changing the way we view disability: the history, perspective, and vision of the independent living movement in canada. ottawa, on, canada: creative bound international. mallett, r., & runswick-cole, k. (2014). approaching disability: critical issues and perspectives. london, uk: routledge. mcdonald, k.e., keys, c.b., & balcazar, f.e. (2007). disability, race/ethnicity and gender: themes of cultural oppression, acts of individual resistance. american journal of community psychology, 39, 145-161. oliver, m. (1996). understanding disability: from theory to practice. basingstoke, uk: macmillan. hodge journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 2 7 rice, c., chandler, e., harrison, e., liddiard, k., & ferrari, m. (2015). project re-vision: disability at the edges of representation. disability & society, 30(4), 513-527. sassen, s. (2014). expulsions: brutality and complexity in the global economy. cambridge, ma: harvard university press. seeman, m.v. (2005). psychiatry in the nazi era. canadian journal of psychiatry, 50(4), 218225. silberman, s. (2015). neurotribes; the legacy of autism and how to think smarter. london, uk: allen & unwin. stackhouse, r.r. (n.d.). labouring. out from under: disability, history and things to remember (website). toronto, on, canada: ryerson university. accessed at http://www.ryerson.ca/ofu/exhibits/labouring.html. sward, m.r. (1917). the defective child. the american journal of nursing, 17(6), 496-501. titchkosky, t. (2007). reading and writing disability differently: the textured life of embodiment. london, on, canada: university of toronto press. williamson. w.j. (2016). the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery. part two: cells of categorical confinement. journal of applied hermeneutics. article 5. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5np1x18 microsoft word field editorial corrected proof.docx corresponding author: james c. field, phd email: jfield@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics may 13, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 invited guest editorial quaint memories of puzzling through mysteries james c. field the incompleteness of meaning and the finitude of understanding suggest that the subject matters (die sache) of understanding are mysteries rather than problems. mysteries are not subject to the methodological solutions problems are. a problem denotes a difficulty demanding a solution. mysteries however can only be understood more deeply. they are not to be explained away but are to be discerned as an ever-present limit to our understanding. they invoke an apprehension of a radical limitlessness. (davey, 2006, p. 29) i had the good fortune of supervising john’s thesis—a mysterious venture to be sure, because when we started, neither the path nor the destination were clear. memory and the workings of time have robbed me of the exact sequence of things--as ricouer (2004) noted in his last great work, there is a “shadowy underside to the bright region of memory” p. 21). the “bright regions of memory” that remain are what ricouer (2004) called the “memory-events,” where something in particular happened, and they arise in perception again, not as simple recollection, but as an “evocation of the absent-present” (p. 35). this is to say they re-occur as events, mixed inevitably with forgetting, imagination, and a trace of consequences. one suffers them, undergoes them in their “presence” anew. it must be said that the “suffering” involved in the case of remembering how john’s work unfolded is what ricouer (2004) called a “happy memory”: the joy and the learning that resulted from the event are fused to the occurrence itself, lending significance, supplying a surplus of pleasure, engendering, once again, the joy of “being there.” but enough of that, for this is not meant to be a treatise on memory, but a re-membering of what field journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 4 2 happened, and what was learned from it. i wanted to set out a brief description of what i mean by the phrase, i remember when i use it, not so much as a claim to recalling “exactly what happened,” for that is impossible, but more as an attempt to stay true to the shards that remain: what is still felt, the learning and thinking that persists, that is, the application of the memories that remains in play. i remember what was “there” from the very beginning of john’s dissertation, in the heideggerian sense, so also “not there,” but certainly “there enough” that it spoke the loudest to john, was this phenomenon that would not go away/constantly slipped away: those students designated by the system, by many of the teachers, by many of us in academe, as “slow learners.” there they sat, smack in the middle of john’s practice, staring back at him, calling out to him, but more pressingly, “calling him out,” as ricoeur (1992) might have said, and then disappearing. i remember being drawn into the topic, listening to john as he unfolded what he faced in his practice: these particular students were in a fix, and it wasn’t one of their own making. the stakes were high; these were largely forgotten beings, concealed in a system that recognized them, unofficially—but then, briefly revealed, quickly abandoned them to their own devices. many, far too many, of these students struggled silently and disappeared into oblivion, quietly jumping out, falling out, or being pushed out of the system. as john so passionately maintained, this was our loss as well: these were students with hidden talents, in need of cultivation, talent that john could see, and marvelously, helped me see. listening to john, i could sense his desperation and frustration; he wanted to help, and in his own way, in his own school, in a room that invited everyone in that needed help, he did. but that wasn’t enough, not for john, but more importantly, not for us, not if we were going to declare that we were educators that didn’t just care for those that did well, but also the less fortunate. ethically, we were enjoined by the topic. i remember in the process of listening, being summoned by this realization: these students were calling out to the part of our selves that was hidden from us, or at least from me. listening to john, my “slow self,” our slow selves, came into view, and a question bubbled up to the surface: which one of us can claim that he or she has never been a slow learner? who hasn’t been that character in a technologically-accelerated world that moves so fast as to be designated “posthuman” (kroker, 2014)? and then another question came, hard on the heels of the first: haven’t we always, when we try to understand, been slow learners? “the owl of minerva flies at night,” for all of us, does it not? more essentially, shouldn’t we all be slow learners? what is “dwelling” for heidegger, or “whiling” for gadamer, if not the necessary, slow, lived-through, suffered experience required to understand things differently? i remember the question of how to proceed rearing its head. what to do, with whom, when, and how much, in the face of this intriguing “practical mystery,” full of appearances, disappearances, dead-ends and detours? there was a point where the “method” for the study, and the structure and genre of the thesis were still completely undecided, not that we were dumbfounded, nor plunged into nietzsche’s abyss, because the topic had its solid leads, and its intrigue, but the way forward did not yet exist. this is where the experience of working this out really took on the shape of an adventure. we were being launched into something, and while i might not have realized it at the time, it was as romano (2012) wrote, a journey of no return. i no longer think of dissertations, nor being a supervisor, in the way that i did, there are now new possibilities in field journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 4 3 front of me. partly the need for adventure was of our own doing, because john had proposed, and i agreed, that he do something different, in form and in structure, with his dissertation. mostly though, i think we realized that we had to attend to this as a mystery, to remain true to its mysterious character, and not, as davey (2006) reminded us, treat what confronted us as a scientific problem to be solved through method, but rather as something that must be ventured into. i remember john’s e-mail proposing to do the dissertation as a hard-boiled detective novel, and it immediately struck me as the right thing to do. within the hour—at least as i remember it, i wrote him back and said, simply “go for it.” we were off, and i remember feeling ecstatic, but also, more than a little intimidated. i was haunted at times by questions, visited at late at night, as “hauntology” (kroker, 2014) is wont to do, with doubt: what if it didn’t work? what if we got half-way in, or a year down the road, and had to abandon the project entirely and start over? would the dissertation survive a train wreck like that? would john survive? would i? even if the work flourished between us, there was no guarantee that it would survive formal examination. the question of how a dissertation like this would be received was with us for a long, long time. would other academics see this as a foolish, undisciplined flight of fancy (we constantly asked, toward the end of the drafting process when the piece approached 400 pages, “who the hell will we get for an external”?), or would the rigor of the work be visible to an academic eye not familiar with the tradition and the genre? i certainly did not excuse myself from the ability or inability to see “goodness” or potential in a piece of work—blindness, as heidegger reminded us, is part of the human condition of caring deeply, of being right there for someone, fully and deeply engaged, with the best of intentions. i would have to be able to see and say something more than “go for it” at the bottom of every draft. was i up to this? was i up to helping john fulfill the hermeneutic warrants for the study, the requisites of a good hard-boiled detective mystery, as well as allow him to shape something that was uniquely “john’s,” and pass muster in academe? hmmm: the topic, had arrived, kept arriving in fact, in all its “horror and charm” (sartre, 1939). now this might sound a little overstated, it might fall prey too much to the work of imagination, so let me step back for a minute here to try to dispel the existence of states of boundless courage, blind faith, and recklessness on both our parts. i had been on john’s ma thesis committee, so i knew that i could bet on john’s capability as a writer and thinker, his solid understanding of what hermeneutics was about, and his capacity as a skilled, thoughtful, and careful practitioner. john did not pull the idea of doing a noir detective mystery out of thin air, or other places, for that matter, and i didn’t agree to go with him on this adventure simply because it was a bright, shiny, new idea, although that is exactly what it was. i am not sure how it became apparent in our conversations that both of us loved dark, detective mysteries, but i do remember rollicking discussions about them. i had been struck previously about the parallels of detective work with hermeneutics—careful, vigilant, disciplined inquiry, that slowly built its own case for proceeding by dogged, persistent fieldwork, dependent upon the clues that appeared, as questions, by the unanticipated events of the pursuit, by what the investigation revealed, and not by predetermined “police procedure.” good detective work, of the hard-boiled kind, was strikingly similar to what romano (2012) called “evential hermeneutics: elucidating the meaning of the human adventure using events as the guiding thread” (p. 48). the engine of this kind of hermeneutic inquiry is the “profound upheaval” that events provide, and what is revealed when things of import happen to us: field journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 4 4 existence, understanding, truth come into view as events that happen to dasein, and thereby to being as such. understanding is a work of truth; truth is uncovering. these existentials denote, in some way the very event of being. (p. 13) part of the courage to do this came through undergoing: talking things out, working back and forth from what hermeneutics required, to what “hermeneutics warrants” could be fulfilled by the detective noir, and to how to do the “non-fictional” things dissertations require: critical literature reviews, interviews, document analyses. i think the only thing we sacrificed, probably with a little too much glee, was apa style—that we had to sneak through the bureaucratic requirements of doing a phd. fortunately, we had a good committee that saw the value of the work and looked the other way, or maybe it might be more accurate to say they were dazzled by the brightness of the quality of the work, and the style fell into the shadows. one last important point to remind us all of the danger of a hermeneutics that simply ends in the bon homie of agreement: there was a threat to the study that made the hard-boiled noir, and a hard-boiled detective, necessary for both of us. we worried, familiar as we were with each other’s thinking, and with both of us operating out of the same hermeneutic tradition, that there was a danger that we had too much in common, took too many of the same things for granted, saw things too much in the same way. philosophically, theoretically, pedagogically, john and i were on the “same side,” we were for and against the same things. where was the other in our thinking, seeing and conversation? who or what would be “the event” that would shake us out of our slumber, keep us on the “right path of looking” (heidegger, 1999, p. 62), preserve, ironically, through endangering, the authentic, valid character of a journey? enter max, from the other side of town, who could show up at night, like lightening, and expose what was in the shadows of our taken-for-grantedness. you don’t have to like him, there were times that we didn’t, but he is as necessary to this story as trouble is to hermeneutics. i will leave you to him now, and the “horror and the charm” of his hermeneutic trouble-making… references davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding. new york, ny: suny. heidegger, m. (1999). ontology-the hermeneutics of facticity. bloomington, ia: indiana university press. kroker, m. (2014). exits to the post-human future. cambridge, ma: polity press. ricouer, p. (2004). memory, history, forgetting. chicago, il: university of chicago press. ricouer, p. (1992). oneself as another. chicago, il: university of chicago press. romano, c. (2002). event and world. new york, ny: fordham press. field journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 4 5 sartre, p. (1939). intentionality: a fundamental idea of husserl’s phenomenology. journal of the british society for phenomenology, 1(2), 4-5. microsoft word laing final word.docx corresponding author: catherine m. laing rn phd email: laingc@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics august 5, 2013 the author(s) 2013 the island of misfit toys catherine m. laing & nancy j. moules abstract a philosophical hermeneutic study was conducted to understand the meaning of children’s cancer camps for children with cancer and their families. six families and five camp counselors were interviewed in order to bring understanding to this topic. while the research included findings related to the concept of play at cancer camp (both philosophically and theoretically); grief as something to live with versus “get over”; storytelling as a means of re-shaping and understanding traumatic experiences; and the solidarity of the community as one that creates intense, healing bonds, this paper details the finding related to the children and families experience of finding acceptance and fit at camp. keywords children’s cancer camps, hermeneutic research, pediatric oncology, pediatric psychosocial oncology in response to the stress of the childhood cancer experience, children’s cancer camps arose in the 1970s as a way for children and their families to escape the rigidity and severity of cancer treatment (bluebondlangner, perkel, goertzel, nelson, & mcgeary, 1990; kids cancer care foundation of alberta, 2012). cancer camps are designed to meet the needs of the whole family at each stage in the cancer experience from diagnosis through treatment, to survival or bereavement (kids cancer care foundation of alberta, 2012). in 2008, the eight camps across canada provided specialized oncology camps and community support programs to 5,252 children and their families – a 10% increase from the previous three years (canadian association of pediatric oncology camps, 2012). as more children are surviving childhood cancer, the need for specialized camps and community programs continues to grow. our intent in this paper is to describe one of the findings of the first author’s doctoral laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 8 2 research study that invoked philosophical hermeneutics as an approach to understand the meaning of children’s cancer camps for the child with cancer and the family. six families and five cancer camp counselors were interviewed in order to bring understanding to this topic. the doctoral thesis research included findings related to: the concept of play at cancer camp (both philosophically and theoretically); grief as something to live with versus “get over”; storytelling as a means of re-shaping and understanding traumatic experiences; and the solidarity of the community as one that creates intense, healing bonds. in this paper, we will detail the specific finding related to the children and families experience of finding acceptance and fit at camp. interpretive analysis um, i know this sounds really weird but sometimes i think of camp as the island of misfit toys cause there’s all something we’re all damaged in some kind of way, and then it’s just amazing to see the kids they’re so proud of who they are when they come to camp. the camper that comes to mind is liam…he’s just, i mean ah, he has his leg amputated and he calls his little stump tiny tim (laughs). i mean, outtrip [an overnight camping experience], like he was just telling a story and showing off tiny tim to all the campers cause they’re all curious about it…he’s just so proud of himself and i think it’s just fantastic to see, and it really inspires the other kids in the group. i noticed since he told his story other kids have come out of their shells and they’re just, they’re like, you know what, it’s ok to be who i am – something might not look quite right, but it’s ok cause we’re all here together. (counselor) the island of misfit toys was an addition to the classic christmas story of rudolph the red-nosed reindeer, originally airing in 1964. it is an island sanctuary where defective and unwanted toys are sent, including, among its inhabitants, a cowboy who rides an ostrich, a train with square wheels, a squirt gun that shoots grape jelly, and an airplane that cannot fly (wikipedia, 2012). i remember watching this show as a child, and feeling badly for these forlorn toys, rejected from santa’s sack because they were imperfect. it seemed unfair to me even at a young age that something could be rejected or excluded due to imperfections. the counselor’s comparison of camp to the island of misfit toys struck me as a perfect metaphor for what i had noticed at camp, but up until the point of her saying it, was unable to articulate. before further discussion, a closer examination of the word misfit is warranted. merriam-webster (2012) defines misfit as “something that fits badly,” or, “a person who is poorly adapted to a situation or environment.” it is an interesting word from an etymological perspective, with mis meaning “in a changed manner,” and with a root sense of “difference, change,” and fit, coming from the early 15th century, meaning “suitable” (etymonline, 2012). it is not my intention to dissect this word into infinitesimally small pieces, however, i wish to draw attention to something important as sometimes deconstructing words such as this offers a different lens from which to understand, or at least challenge, the traditional meaning. when one separates mis from fit, and examines them as two distinct words, the word misfit can be understood differently. misfit, from an etymological standpoint, can be understood as something, or someone, that is “differently suited” versus the traditional definition offered earlier of “a person who is poorly adapted to a situation or environment.” laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 8 3 cancer camp, like the island of misfit toys, offers a “sanctuary” of sorts, a place of belonging, acceptance, and safety. at cancer camp, there is no such thing as someone who does not fit in, in fact “usually the quirky kids get pulled into the group the fastest” (counselor). before examining this culture of acceptance and how these children are “differently suited,” it is important to first look at how it is children with cancer stand out and often feel un-accepted in the “real world.” 1 understanding fit: from misfit to fitting in mother (talking about the kids at camp): there’s a variety of different types of challenges and everybody just kind of accepts that that’s where they are, they’ve got theirs you’ve got yours and it moves on. everybody’s got their issues, they’re all quirky, they’ve all got their challenges, so what? father: but outside the general, you know, the outlook, um, it’s a little different, it’s a little more harsh, a little less acceptance. (parents of a child with a brain tumor) most of the families who spoke about camp being a place of acceptance had a child with a visible or behavioral difference that distinguished them from their peers. from loss of hair due to chemotherapy, to brain tumors, radiation therapy, or unrelated concurrent illnesses or syndromes (e.g., asperger’s/autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder), most children who have experienced cancer have also experienced looking, 1 the “real world” is the language most children and families used in my interviews when describing life outside of the camp environment. i have chosen to adopt this language when describing the same. or being, different from their healthy peers at some point along the cancer trajectory. they have experienced a mis-fit in the real world, and all of the accompanying challenges. we know from the literature that “peer relationships are an important index of a child’s current social competence and psychosocial adjustment” (vannattaa, gartstein, zellerc, & noll, 2009, p. 303). establishing relationships with peers is a major developmental task of preadolescence and adolescence (sullivan, 1953) and provides an important context for learning social skills and mastering the complexities of cooperation and competition (hartup, 1999; rubin, bukowski, & parker, 2006). i offer that it is by being completely, unconditionally accepted at camp, that these children come to understand that they are differently suited to their environment. matthew got to be matthew, he wasn't judged. i mean they all have quirks – i mean some of them can't see and stuff – that cancer affects, so he didn't feel like he was standing out and he tried things. i mean he did the flying squirrel! (mother) according to chilean biologist humberto maturana, acceptance and love originate from the same source. he defined love as “the spontaneous dynamic condition of acceptance by a living system of its coexistence with another (or others) living system” (maturana, 1986, p. 59). love, he offered, involves “opening a space of existence for an other in coexistence with oneself on a particular domain of interactions” (p. 59). norris (2009) further troubled this notion of love by noting that in buddhist thought, the ability to open space is something that can be intentionally cultivated. from a biological perspective (maturana) to buddhism, there are parallels between love, acceptance, and space. i find this particularly fitting, given the landscape on which camp resides. it is open and spacious, as if to be the literal interpretation of laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 8 4 maturana’s notion of love. the open spaces of camp are defined by the structures around them the trees, the pond, the lodges, and the other various structures that occupy this space. it is in the empty spaces though, the “between-ness,” that brings to mind a poem in the tao te ching entitled the utility of nonexistence: though thirty spokes may form the wheel, it is the hole within the hub which gives the wheel utility. it is not the clay the potter throws which gives the pot its usefulness, but the space within the shape from which the pot is made. without a door, the room cannot be entered, and without windows it is dark. such is the utility of non-existence. (taoism information page, 2004) like the hole in the hub of the wheel, it is perhaps in the empty spaces of camp where the most value lies. the buildings, ropes course, and campfire pit provide the structure (spokes) around which the wheel turns. the essence of camp, however, lay in the spaces between, as it is here that acceptance and “fit” is found. it is not just the children with cancer who find acceptance at camp. siblings, too, described a sense of relief being in the camp environment: i like how, well, in my dorm we were talking about sometimes at school and stuff people don’t really know. they say, “oh we know what you’re going through” but they don’t really, so when we come to camp everybody knows what you’re going through and you like, fit in. (sibling) well, sometimes at school, when i was in grade one when it first happened [sibling diagnosed with cancer], people thought that um, like i had it, like it was contagious, like they could catch it from me, and everybody started avoiding me and stuff like that. but then it started to pass by, but i always remembered that. when i went to camp, it just went away, like i forgot about that. (sibling) i believe there is a profound change that happens to children when they are in an environment of complete acceptance. particularly when this environment is different from their real world, i suggest that there is something that happens to these kids that allows them to experience themselves differently. one of the counselors offered this example: i think the same self-confidence that i found that i gained over the years at camp you’ll see it in campers. you’ll have kids that come out and you can tell right away from the start that they’re the quiet kids, they’re a little bit more reserved…back at home they’re probably not the most popular kids ever, and by, you know, mid week once they’ve kind of been pulled in to the group by the other kids and just welcomed with open arms, they really start to thrive and their self confidence is apparent, and you’ll see these kids actually start to become leaders of the group. and even some of the kids who maybe have behavioral problems at home, um, getting a chance to be in an environment that’s so different from what they’re used to, and actually sometimes that extra energy that they don’t know what to do with they can place constructively. they really start to stand out and shine in terms of how they treat other campers. they take on this positive leadership role where they’re really helping the other campers out and it’s really cool to see these kids really…come into their own, and not have to worry about, you know, how cool they look or you know, clothes they’re wearing, or what they need laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 8 5 to be doing so that people accept them, and just actually getting a chance to figure out who they think they are, not who other people want them to be. (counselor) perhaps, like this counselor said, it is that these children – these children who are “poorly adapted to a situation or environment” (merriam-webster, 2012) are given space to figure out who they are, not who other people want them to be. they are provided with space within which they find they fit. the consequences of “fit” are seemingly endless, for it is from this i suggest that the tangible, perhaps even quantifiable, differences (e.g, increased self-confidence and selfesteem, quality of life, etc.) in the children arise. while these differences have been the focus of several research projects (e.g., balen, fielding, & lewis, 1998; ruffin, creed, & jarvis, 1997), i offer that it may be precisely why these presumably measurable constructs are not only difficult to quantify in this type of environment but also fail to capture the why of the difference. when i first started this research, i felt certain i would, at some point, be discussing the changes in the children, as a result of camp. indeed, these types of discussions happened frequently in my interviews and were captured in other ways throughout this research. however, the “results” of camp, the changes in the children, are what i now understand as the side effects. i believe the utility, the why, the reason for these changes, to be the space, acceptance, and fit that is experienced at camp. from acceptance and fit to recognition and understanding so when they’re here, it’s not that they’re the [only] family that’s dealing with it [cancer] and friends are all saying “oh i can’t imagine that, that’s so horrible” right? and they’re talking to people who say that they’ve been through it, they know exactly what they’re feeling and they know exactly what they’ve gone through, they know what they have to look forward to, so families can really talk to each other and relate, and that kind of makes this a really safe environment. (counselor) camp, never one to discriminate, opens its space of acceptance and fit not only to the children but also the parents. age and experience, however, position parents differently in the camp experience, and i believe they experience the acceptance and fit of camp in a different way than their children. i mean it’s neat meeting them [other parents] and hearing their stories and being able to share your story and having them understand it, you know. not having to, you know, explain every little detail. you can say well she went in and got her port accessed and got chemo and they go, oh yeah, ok. whereas, you know, you say that to somebody on the street and they go, huh? (parent) many parents told me that one of the best parts (often the best part) of camp, was the relationships they formed with other cancer parents. because other parents have “been there” and have likely experienced many of the same emotional responses and challenges that accompany the diagnosis of childhood cancer, they are in a unique position to establish a meaningful bond with other cancer parents (higgins, santelli, & turnbull, 1997). higgins et al. summarized that research indicates support offered from other parents increases parents' acceptance of their situation, increases parents' sense of being able to cope, and offers a unique form of support that would be unlikely to come from any other source. while the bonds created between the parents were strong, i came to understand the laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 8 6 formation and subsequent strength of these connections as a form of recognition. etymologically, the word “recognize” comes from the latin, recognoscere, from re“again,” and cognoscere – “know,” to recognize is to “know again, acknowledge, recall to mind, examine, certify” (online etymology dictionary, 2012). there was a process of “knowing again” in these families – knowing again the fear, the suffering, the sleepless nights, incessant worry, and all that comes with the diagnosis of childhood cancer. all of these handmaidens of childhood cancer require no explanation among this group of parents. there is no need to have to explain the severity of a circumstance because other parents at camp understand it intrinsically. they, too, have lived through experiences no one else could understand unless they were in the same situation. most parents arrive at camp not knowing any other parents, however, in the company of familiar strangers, a closeness quickly ensues. the gap of not knowing someone is filled by the recognition of experience, of “i understand.” dr. brene brown, in her 2012 ted talk entitled “listening to shame,” offered that the two most powerful words when we are in struggle are “me too.” “me too,” she explained, implies empathy, but i offer it implies not just empathy but also recognition. i extend this one step further. if i look back to what recognition means once again, to “know again,” it is conceivable that there is a recursiveness at play. parents, i have proposed, recognize (and hence, feel recognized by) other parents who have experienced childhood cancer. however, there is also an element of “knowing again” their own experiences. in other words, they are given an opportunity to “re-know” their experiences of childhood cancer. “like pulls like. we’re kind of mirrors in a way” (parent). mirrors, of course, reflect images and, in this case, the images being reflected back to the parents are of their own experiences having a child with cancer. these other parents, mirrors of themselves, can offer an opportunity to come to re-know or know differently how they experience this disease. it is known in the literature that parents of children with cancer often suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder (ptsd) (bruce, 2006; lindahl norberg, pöder, & von essen, 2011; yalug, tufan, doksat, & yaluğ, 2011). kazak, boeving, alderfer, hwang, and reilly (2005) demonstrated the high prevalence of ptsd in their study consisting of 119 mothers and 52 fathers of children with cancer, where all but one parent had ptsd symptoms. likewise, alderfer, cnaan, annunziato, and kazak (2005) studied 98 couples who were parents of an adolescent survivor of childhood cancer. the adolescents had completed treatment an average of five years before the study, and although parents' ptsd symptoms were less common than those found in parents during the period of their children's treatment, in the majority of families studied, at least one of the parents had moderate to severe ptsd. perhaps then, through the opportunity to reknow this experience, to re-visit and remember, traumatic events and emotions are processed and internalized differently. i offer that it is during this re-visitation that healing occurs, and it is this that is behind the reason so many parents described the importance of connecting with other cancer parents. in recognition, they find healing. it is important to note while the majority of parents described the importance of connecting with other cancer parents, one parent found it very difficult. these mirrors, i learned, sometimes project back images that are too difficult to see: laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 8 7 some people, they take comfort in the fact that, you know, you’re not alone in the world, you are not the only person that’s gone through this thing. it’s, ah, but i’m not there, i don’t really want to ah, i don’t really want to be reminded. it’s still too fresh. (don, parent) this parent, don, talked about his “what if” moments the most terrifying moments during treatment when he knew that there existed the possibility of losing his child. these “what ifs” became paralyzing for him, even causing a period of severe depression at one point. while his child, now recently off treatment, is considered “cured” of cancer, for this father, his “what ifs,” his deepest darkest moments, are still close by, always hovering within arms reach, like a menacing thunderstorm. he told me about meeting another family at camp whose child was the same age and had the same diagnosis as his child. for this other family, however, it was clear that this would be the last camp their child would attend, as it was evident this child would not survive much longer. for don, facing that reality, recognizing in that family so much of his own experience, and being confronted by a family whose “what ifs” were coming true, it proved to be overwhelming. i was, you know i kind of take it on right, i can’t, i can’t just not feel bad for these people…you know. after imagining it so many times myself what it would be like for us… um, so, ah, so yeah, and then to see it realized in another family…that was…all those what ifs (tearful)…it’s hard. (don, parent) the deepest, darkest spots were described by many of the parents i interviewed, and almost all of them spoke about spending some time there, in those wells of despair. i puzzled over don’s situation, given he was the only parent that described not feeling the relief of connecting with other parents. other parents, i thought, could offer support for him, and surely he could find relief among these people he shared so much with just by virtue of having a child with the same disease. i will offer that, like anything else, camp is not for everyone. it is not a one size fits all, rather a one size fits most, and perhaps camp did not fit with don’s way of being. maturana would call this the way he is “structurally determined.” an individual’s biopsychosocial – spiritual structure is unique and is the product of the individual’s genetic history as well as his or her history of interactions over time (maturana & varela, 1992). in other words, don’s “structure” determines how he will respond to environmental influences, and which of those he will experience as meaningful. i am inclined to think there is another explanation, or another way to understand this. the “deep, dark spots” and “wells of despair” are accurate metaphors for what many parents experience at times throughout the experience of childhood cancer. they fall into a hole, surrounded by darkness, with no understanding of how to climb out. the journey out of the hole, i offer, is comprised of time, healing, adaptation, and sometimes even deliberate intervention (e.g., counseling, antidepressants). i believe that camp also offers a way out of this hole; it shines a light, throws down a ladder, and extends its hand to help the person out. for don, it is perhaps his propensity for deep empathy – the way he is structurally determined – coupled with the newness of the experience (his child had only recently finished treatment) that resulted in his reluctance to engage with other parents. perhaps, don was simply not ready to connect with other families on an emotional level just yet. it is conceivable that, as time goes on, he may be inclined to do this and could find great support among the other parents. camp does not force itself on anyone, however, and laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 8 8 like a cherished friend, it is there when and if it is needed. from recognition to understanding there is a subtle yet important difference between recognition and understanding. where recognition, as established earlier, means to “know again,” to understand is defined as “to grasp the meaning of” (merriam-webster, 2012). the word comes from old english understandan, meaning literally to “stand in the midst of” (etymonline, 2012). i think there is an implied courage when one “stands in the midst of” with another, when one understands. it made me wonder, though: why is it that these parents “understand” so well? is it simply having shared experiences or is there something else at play? i think the thing that we like the most about it is the fact that you can be with other families and you can actually talk over your situations. so you get the idea, cause your friends don’t really understand, your neighbors don’t really understand, so, but when you come together with other families, you know, our situations are all different but we all have a key factor that’s the same. (parent) and so they [other cancer parents] understand what you’re going through, the stresses of what you’re going through, you know, the hospital visits and all of that kind of stuff. (parent) while they did not term it as such, there is reciprocity to the type of understanding of which these parents spoke. they felt understood, as can be seen in the above quotes, but they were also understanding with respect to the other parents. it seemed to me like the two actions – being both the receiver and giver of understanding – were inseparable. two parents offered some insight into this when they told me what it is like talking with friends who do not have a child with cancer: mother: some people want to talk about it but i think in general most people really don’t. cause you know, in all honesty, it’s – especially when it’s friends with children – there’s always that, i don’t know, fear of the unknown, or – so i think it’s hard for them kinda, to reach out to you. father: but when you’re first diagnosed i think a lot more people want to know what’s going on. and then – two years down the road, they don’t realize you’re still in treatment, you’re still, you know – she looks healthy, she’s got way too much energy, so anyone who sees her has no idea she has cancer. mother: so if someone says something and you go, oh yeah, you know, abby is still in treatment or whatever, they go, what? what? i think it is interesting to look at the concept of understanding in a literal manner. if i choose to “stand in the midst of” with someone, to literally place my body beside theirs, an opening, a space, must necessarily be created for me to do that. this creation or opening of space for another is reminiscent of maturana’s (1986) definition of love, “opening a space of existence for an other” (p. 59). perhaps it follows then, that the understanding that occurs among this group of parents is so powerful because it is a form of love. i offer that this is indeed what is happening, and that this special type of understanding these parents have for one another, their courageous ability to “stand in the midst of” with each other, and the space they open for others to stand with them, is a form of love. “and they all love you [at camp], regardless of any circumstance, and no one should have to have a child that has cancer, it’s not fair” (mother). laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 8 9 it is well recognized that contact with other families with similarly affected children is often comforting because they have shared similar experiences (leonard, 1991) and that parent support groups (which, it may be argued, is informally what is happening at camp) have shown that parents gain increased skills, an increased sense of power and a sense of belonging by connecting with other families in similar situations (law, king, stewart, & king, 2002). camp seems to provide moments and opportunities for these types of interactions to occur that are unlikely to have happened elsewhere, and i believe it is by these families coming together in this environment that the deepest kind of understanding transpires, the kind of understanding that precipitates healing. concluding thoughts they [cancer families] come out to a place [cancer camp] where there’s a group of people that care specifically about them for no other reason than, i think, that they inspire me, you know. as to what they’re all going through and how they, how well they’re raising their kids and um, it’s just kind of different from regular life. and i think getting that chance to get away from everything they’re used to, and out to a spot where they’re not different, they’re not singled out, and ah, people are just there to look out for them and you know, make sure that they’re just enjoying themselves for once, i think is a really big deal for families. (counselor) there is an organic-ness to camp in the landscape certainly, but also in what is at play. naturally occurring interactions, activities, and moments in time where mis is separated from fit, and acceptance, recognition, understanding – all found in abundance at cancer camp – are for some individuals more powerful than any therapeutic intervention. like the poem in the tao te ching, the greatest utility of camp comes from the empty spaces, for it is in these empty spaces, so perfectly defined by the surrounding structures, that healing occurs. biographies catherine m. laing, rn, phd is an assistant professor in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary. nancy j. moules, rn, phd is a professor in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary. she also holds the achf/achri nursing professorship in child and family centred cancer care. acknowledgement this doctoral study was funded by a generous scholarship from the alberta children’s hospital foundation to which the authors express immense gratitude. references alderfer, m.a., cnaan, a., annunziato, r.a., & kazak, a.e. (2005). patterns of posttraumatic stress symptoms in parents of childhood cancer survivors. journal of family psychology, 19(3), 430-40. doi:10.1037/08933200.19.3.430 balen, r., fielding, d., & lewis, i.j. (1998). an activity week for children with cancer: who wants to go and why? child: care, health and development, 24(2), 169-177. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2214.1998.00062.x bluebond-langner, m., perkel, d., goertzel, t., nelson, k., & mcgeary, j. (1990). children’s knowledge of cancer and its treatment: impact of an oncology camp experience. the laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 8 10 journal of pediatrics, 116(2), 207-213. doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82876-8 bruce, m. (2006). a systematic and conceptual review of posttraumatic stress in childhood cancer survivors and their parents. clinical psychology review, 26(3), 233–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.10.002 canadian association of pediatric oncology camps. (2012). about capoc. retrieved from http://www.cancer camps.ca/?q=node/34 hartup, w.w. (1999). peer experience and its developmental significance. in m. bennett (ed.), developmental psychology: achievements and prospects (pp. 106–125). philadelphia, pa: psychology press. higgins, c., santelli, b., & turnbull, a. (1997). parent to parent support and health care. pediatric nursing, 23(3), 303-306. retrieved from http://www.pediatricnursing. net kazak, a.e., boeving, c.a., alderfer, m.a., hwang, w.t., & reilly, a. (2005). posttraumatic stress symptoms during treatment in parents of children with cancer. journal of clinical oncology, 23(30), 7405–7410. doi:10.1200/jco.2005.09.110 kids cancer care foundation of alberta. (2012). retrieved from http://www.kidscancercare.ab.ca/kccf/camp_a nd_community.htm law, m., king, s., stuart, d., & king, g. (2002). the perceived effects of parent-led support groups for parents of children with disabilities. physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics 21(2-3), 29-48. doi:10.1080 /j006v21n02_03 leonard, j.v. (1991). parent support groups. british medical journal, 303(6811), 1152. retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/3/ lindahl norberg a., poder, u., & von essen, l. (2011). early avoidance of disease and treatment related distress predicts posttraumatic stress in parents of children with cancer. european journal of oncology nursing, 15(1), 80–84. doi:10.1016/ j.ejon.2010.05.009 maturana, h.r. (1986). reflections on love. cybernetics, 2(1), 58-60. maturana, h.r., & varela, f.j. (1992). the tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding (rev. ed., r. paolucci, trans.). boston, ma: shambhala. misfit. (n.d.). in merriam-webster’s online dictionary. retrieved from http://www. merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misfit misfit. (n.d.). in online etymology dictionary. retrieved from retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allow ed_in_frame=0&search=misfit& searchmode =none norris, j. (2009). going deeper: cultivating a generative approach to personal transformation and systems change in outdoor education (unpublished doctoral dissertation). university of calgary. calgary, ab, canada. recognize. (n.d.). in online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http://www. etmonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame= 0&search=recognize& searchmode=none rubin, k.h., bukowski, w.m., & parker, j.g. (2006). peer interactions, relationships, and groups. in n. eisenberg, w. damon, & r.m. lerner (eds.), handbook of child psychology: social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., vol. 3, pp. 571–645). hoboken, nj: john wiley & sons. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 8 11 rudolph the red-nosed reindeer. (2012). in wikipedia. retrieved from http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/rudolph_the_rednosed_reindeer_( tv_special) ruffin, j.e., creed, j.m., & jarvis, c. (1997). a retreat for families of children recently diagnosed with cancer. cancer practice, 5(2), 99-104. retrieved from http://www-ncbi-nlmngov.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/pubmed/911064 6 sullivan, h.s. (1953). the interpersonal theory of psychiatry. new york, ny: w.w. norton. taoism information page. (2004). retrieved fromhttp://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/gthursby/t aoism understand. (n.d.). in merriam-webster’s online dictionary. retrieved from http://www. merriam-webster.com/dictionary/understand understand. (n.d.). in online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http://www. etmonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame= 0&search=understand&searchmode=none vannatta, k., garstein, m.a., zeller, m., & noll, r.b. (2009). peer acceptance and social behavior during childhood and adolescence: how important are appearance, athleticism, and academic competence? international journal of behavioral development, 33(4), 303-311. doi:10.1177/0165025408101275 yalug, i., tufan, a.e., doksat, k., & yaluğ, k. (2011). post-traumatic stress disorder and post-traumatic stress symptoms in parents of children with cancer: a review. neurology, psychiatry and brain research, 17(1), 27-31. doi:10.1016/j.npbr. 2011.02.007 microsoft word editorial moules (1).docx corresponding author: nancy j. moules, phd email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics june 8, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 editorial: following good leads nancy j. moules in publishing the serialization of dr. williamson’s the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery in the journal of applied hermeneutics in an unfolding of five installments, i have followed an interesting adventure, a mystery full of excitement, turns, breath-holding, unconcealments, and phenomenological pauses. there were many reasons that i invited and welcomed dr. williamson’s showcasing of his doctoral thesis in this journal in this particular format as exemplary of applied hermeneutics. however beyond my initial intentions, i am reflective of the results and implications it has had for me in my own thinking about doctoral hermeneutic research and of my own hermeneutic research. in no small part, it has reminded me of the necessary task in hermeneutics of following good leads. i first learned of dr. williamson’s proposal to present his hermeneutic study in the form of a hard-boiled detective novel through his doctoral supervisor, dr. jim field, who subsequently invited me to join john’s supervisory committee. the idea was exciting to me, provocative, creative, energetic and “dangerous” if it was poorly done. it was not. however, it did invoke a different sense of danger, a danger that is inherent in applied hermeneutic research a hermeneutic wager to take a risk. the danger i speak of here lies in the idea that when the work is done well, it involves unconcealment it is disquieting, disruptive, and evocative. john’s work is an example of applied hermeneutics: interpretation and understanding taken to practice, applied to a topic, and taking the wager to deconstruct and then re-construct. as professor hodge wrote in his eloquent editorial (hodge, 2016), this work is a reminder that hermeneutic work does not have to always be presented in the traditional thesis style but, if it is moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 5 2 presented differently, it has to be done well. it has to maintain scholarship, integrity, rigor, and an intellectual facility that cannot be “played with” in the sense of just having “fun for fun’s sake” as opposed to the carefulness of play in a gadamerian sense, where “the primacy of play over the consciousness of the player is fundamentally acknowledged” (gadamer 1960/2004, p. 105, italics in original). for gadamer, the significance of play is that when one is fully involved in play, it takes one outside of oneself and the game becomes more than a subjective experience. play at the same time requires seriousness to be properly absorbing but also frees the player into responsiveness to the flow of the game. play is not random: it has rules, participants, and a field of play but its possible outcome is open. (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015, pp. 42-43) the play in john’s applied hermeneutics is playfully serious. as i mentioned in a footnote of the first editorial for this work, dr. williamson won the 2015 university of calgary chancellor’s graduate medal and he won it for a reason. the work is taken seriously. the conceptualization and execution of a hermeneutic study presented in the form of a hardboiled detective novel did a remarkable mirroring of the topic itself. as professor hodge wrote, it allowed the topic to appear and disappear, just as the label of “slow learner” has done in the history of education, categorization, and disability studies. the scholarship, however, never disappeared. one might be lured and captivated by the story itself for periods of times almost believing the credibility of a museum of a history of classification of disability (hodge, 2016), but then a reminder came through the carefully footnoted academic and scholarly citatiousness of the work. williamson knew the work of scholars that shored up the “fictional” story that contained a very real topic. the theory and philosophy was never lost and also never compromised the story. this is work of literary genius, but herein lies the first sense of danger that i referred to: not everyone can do this. the danger lies in a possible misconception that hermeneutic work is superficial, an assumption that there is no method, there are no rules, no guidelines, or that “anything goes.” john reminds us that there is not only one way to work hermeneutically, or to apply hermeneutics in a research capacity as a “method.” caputo reminds us that method in the etymological sense is “making one’s way along (meta) the path (odos) to truth” (caputo, 2015, p. xi). in moules et al. (2015), the authors wrote of the idea of “being methodical and following leads” (p. 55) but what is perhaps missed in their discussion is that the leads have to be good leads! the “discipline of attending to things” (dostal, 2002, p. 251) involves a very careful discernment of the intention of the medium in which the work is shown. there are creative works that are very intentional and purposeful and they are presented in particular ways because they are consistent with the topic. as another example, i offer the doctoral work of dr. debb hurlock (2003; 2008) who was examining the use of bronwen wallace’s poetry in teaching nursing classes for deliberate pedagogic purposes. there are many poems in her thesis, including wallace’s but also hurlock’s own poetry and this makes sense. after all, her thesis is about the pedagogic possibilities that lie in poetry. i have, however, read other theses and even published hermeneutic papers where there is what appears to be random poems that are thrown in for some emphasis or attempt at moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 5 3 creativity that does nothing to enliven the topic being discussed. it appears instead that they are an effort to appear adventuresome, poetic, and interpretive, and that is somehow associated with thinking and writing hermeneutically. it is here where we run into the difficulty of our work being dismissed as trite, insubstantial, superficial, and sometimes just silly. this is the challenge i face with students who embark on hermeneutic research: constantly negotiating how to teach students to be care-full, considerate, discerning, attentive, and scholarly, while nurturing the capacity to think and write interpretively and taking some well-considered risks. this is a continual learning for me in my own work as well and what most often guides me is the constant presence of the topic on my shoulder asking if what i am doing, and how i am doing it, is taking me toward the topic or further away from it. max hunter, in his search for the disappearing/appearing slow learner, seems to know this. he is sometimes following bad leads that take him away what what he seeks, and often get him into trouble! as a skilled and hard-boiled detective though, he seems to catch himself in time and although he comes away a little bruised and worse for wear, he recovers his trail and seems to even know when he is getting close to something that is important. this is the work of interpretation in hermeneutic research. something in our interviews/transcripts might catch our attention and we are off on an exhilarating tangent and chase, finding dozens of books and papers that inform us about the interpretation and it is captivating and exciting and sometimes it works. other times, it really has been a bad lead and has taken us away from the mystery of the topic. a little battered and bruised, we have to give up the lead and all those hours of investigation, and head home to the data and start again. these are careful considerations that often cannot be done alone and need the help of others, just as max is saved by foucault and derrida, gadamer and heidegger, or colleen birdseye, just when he needs them! the serialization of this work offers an adventure that is fictional and yet it is not. it is a fictionalization of a very real topic and concern. this is what distinguishes this work as applied hermeneutics research that seeks to understand the complexity of human experiences and grapples with the great problems that we encounter in our everyday practices and lives (mccaffrey & moules, 2016). of all actions, those performed for a purpose have been least understood, no doubt because they have always been counted the most understandable and are to our consciousness the most commonplace. the great problems are to be encountered in the street. (nietzsche, 1881/1982, p. 78) dr. williamson takes us to the streets in a very literal sense in max’s hard-boiled detective work investigating the great problem presented in this work. in doing so, dr. williamson offers us a particularly good lead in his work, one that takes us closer to the possibility that applied hermeneutic work, when done well, can look different and still be scholarly and academic. it is a reminder to me that when one listens deeply to the topic, the topic has something to say about how it needs to be investigated and sometimes (or not) even found. moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 5 4 references caputo, j.d. (2015). foreword: the wisdom of hermeneutics. in n.j. moules, g. mccaffrey, j.c. field, & c.m. laing, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. dostal, r. (2002). gadamer’s relation to heidegger and phenomenology. in c. guignon (ed.), the cambridge companion to gadamer (pp. 247-266). new york, ny: cambridge university press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/2004). truth and method (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). london, uk: continuum. hodge, n. (2016). invited guest editorial. lives worthy of life: the everyday resistance of disabled people. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 2. hurlock, d. (2003). possibilities of a poetic pedagogy: “the movement by which a life gets changed for keeps.” (unpublished doctoral thesis). university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. hurlock, d. (2008). possibilities of a poetic pedagogy: integrating poetry and professional education. saarbrücken, germany: vdm verlag dr. müller aktiengesellschaft & co. mccaffrey, g., & moules, n.j. (2016). encountering the great problems in the street: enacting hermeneutic philosophy as research in practice disciplines. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 1. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5dv1d51 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. nietzsche, f. (1982). daybreak: thoughts on the prejudices of morality (r.j. hollingdale, trans.). cambridge, uk: cambridge university press. corresponding author: graham mccaffrey, rn, phd email: gpmccaff@ ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics october 25, 2016 the author(s) 2016 invited guest editorial: nursing as interpretation graham mccaffrey the two papers that correspond to this editorial were written by graduate students in a hermeneutic research class in the faculty of n ursing at the university of calgary. the class is one locus of the account of applied hermeneutics that has developed thro ugh the canadian hermeneutic institute, the journal of applied hermeneutics, and the book conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice (moules, mccaffrey, field & laing, 2015). the course is open to both master’s and doctoral students and is interdisciplinary, attracting students mainly from nursing, education, and counselling psychology, and occasionally from other disciplines including sociology, kinesiology, social work, and engineering. we teach about the philosophical background of hermeneutics, with a focus on gadamer, and then how concepts can be applied to the conduct of research. what brings the course to life, however, is the range of backgrounds and interests of the students that invariably create a culture of stimulating discussion as they – and the instructors – discover new ideas about their own interests through the encounters with cross cutting themes arriving from unexpected places. the first assignment given to students is to write a paper on the topic of, “nursing…counselling psychology … education… is an interpretive practice,” which is intended to help students to start putting together hermeneutic philosophy with their lived experience of, and expertise in, the practice of their own discipline and profession. the following two papers were both written in response to the question, by students in the master of nursing program at the university of calgary. both lead authors are nurses working in practice, and so each of them is intimately involved in a highly localized world of professional knowledge and application, as is evident from their writing. the settings are quite different, mental health outreach nursing for whitney mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 6 2 turcato and neonatal transport nursing for jaime caswell, yet they each succeed in showing the deeply interpretive nature of their work. if there is one concept that most comes to mind to me in reading their papers, it is phronesis or practical wisdom. each author presents a phenomenological description of an event in practice, capturing thought processes, actions, and the dynamic network of relationships in which practice is formed. these are not only descriptions of phronesis, but reports from inside events of phronesis, that vividly convey the nuanced and rapid way expert judgments of subtle human interactions come about in combination with the precise, and therapeutic application of technical knowledge. whitney turcato’s paper begins with a nurse being woken by a call from a client in the small hours. what happens next is a dialogue in which, as she goes on to explain, she already knows a good deal about the person on the end of the line and is able to interpret his words and formulate her own in the light of that knowledge. possibilities for hermeneutic work present themselves immediately, in dialogue as the means of understanding, in language freighted with meanings beyond and beneath the overt definitions of words, and in the question of reception raised by the irruption of the other into the nurse’s night. gadamer, kearney, and caputo, to name but t hree, are ready and waiting to provide ways into understanding what goes in the exchange. one of the aspects of the paper that struck me most forcefully on first reading, and on subsequent readings, is the use of humour. it is a good portrayal of the humour that passes between mental health nurses, as i know from my own practice, smoothly incorporated into the style of the narrative sections of the paper. the humour has something of the absurd, of laughing at human folly but not at any particular person; it has a bonding function between the nurses, and is underwritten by care and sensitivity towards the situation of the client. humour in mental health nursing is one of many potential theses that are seeded in the paper – if i were to continue along that path, i would start with gadamer’s discussion of play, then maybe read some beckett… jaime caswell demonstrates a similar gift for the phenomenological narrative. she takes the reader quickly into a working day in her lifeworld as a neonatal transport nurse. sections of her paper read as good nursing drama, giving out just enough information to the uninitiated to follow the action without slowing it down. within and beyond her narrative, there emerge problems embedded in everyday practices: the question of how to balance scientific knowledge and sensitivity to parents’ powerful feelings, the diplomacy of being the big city nurse in a smaller centre, all of this perceived, considered, and acted upon against the clock. towards the end of the paper, jaime shows us the image of the nurse handing the baby to the mother, and deftly plays with the literal and metaphorical senses of “handing over.” with this sensitivity to words, she introduces a mobilizing image, which again might be the seed of a potential thesis. in class, following jaime discussing this image, we found ourselves echoing the idea of handing-over in different contexts, involuntarily using the gesture of hands together, palms raised, offering up and passing on. thus, ideas are passed from practice to practice, person to person, and our horizons of understanding ripple and shift as new possibilities come into view. the purpose of the assignment is simply to have students reflect on their own area of practice, and to begin to explore the interpretability of the familiar. these two papers are fine examples of practitioners discovering for themselves, and for us as readers, the proliferative meanings hidden in everyday practices. mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 6 3 references moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. microsoft word moulesetal corrected proof.docx 1 faculty of nursing, university of calgary 2 werklund school of education, university of calgary corresponding author: dr. nancy j. moules email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics april 23, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 conducting hermeneutic research: the address of the topic nancy j. moules1, jim c. field2, graham p. mccaffrey1, & catherine m. laing1 abstract the conduct of research as guided by philosophical tenets of hermeneutics, in particular the hermeneutics of hans-georg gadamer, is a complex and sophisticated endeavor. in this paper, we offer that one of the things that guides the inquiry is the topic and that most often topics for discovery arrive with the experience of an address. we discuss the notion of the address of the topic, how a researcher discerns a topic to be studied and, from this address, develops appropriate research questions that help to inform how the study will be conducted. keywords address, gadamer, hermeneutic research, philosophical hermeneutics, phronesis, research topics, truth “understanding begins when something addresses us” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 299). the conduct of a research study, guided by the tenets of gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics, rarely has a definitive starting point or endpoint, but if one had to delineate a place where inquiry begins, it is often around the experience of being addressed personally about something at work in one’s life. an address is the feeling of being caught in some aspect of the world’s regard, of being called or summoned. in this paper, we speak to the experience and importance of the address of a topic in the working out of a hermeneutic inquiry. what is an address? addresses catch us off guard and break through our regular routines. they cause us to pause and take note, ask not that we speak or do something immediately, but rather that we stop and listen. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 2 it is through this process of listening, or what bruns (1992) called “reading with our ears” (p. 157), that the topic of inquiry arrives. to listen when we are addressed means that we are vulnerable and open, that we are prepared to be guided by a topic and its own form of address, rather than assumed versions of it, or by a pre-determined method. it is not the case that there is not a method in hermeneutics, but rather, that method serves the topic and is informed by the topic. the question becomes one of how we serve the topic in a disciplined way. how are we to be disciplined by the topic? in other words, the topic asks for rigour from us, an attentiveness, and a discipline to stay with it and stay true to it. an address functions to interrupt or unsettle our everyday taken-for-grantedness of things. this is why it arrives typically in the form of a question or set of questions. as dunne (1993) explained: “there is often a suddenness about it that makes us say that a question ‘comes’ to us, that it ‘arises’, or ‘presents itself’” (p. 135). there is a case, though, that an address might not always be sudden; instead, it may have lingered for years and nagged in maybe not quite noticeable ways. however, there is a process of actually “waking up” to this or starting to pay attention to it. bergum (1991) explained what it is that generates questions, and the effects they have: questioning indicates the existence of an unsettled issue, a difficult matter, an uncertainty, a matter for discussion. it also invites a reply, a dialogue, a searching out of opportunities and similarities. it opens possibilities and leads, in some sense, to uncertainty, for it throws what may have been thought secure into dis-equilibrium or imbalance. (p. 57) the address that occurs is a substantive one. we are hailed by subject matter, or better perhaps a subject that matters so that, when we are addressed, we are obligated to respond, not in “any old fashion,” but to respond to the best of our abilities, to do the right thing, in the right way, as gadamer would say. when a topic shows itself, it haunts us, because it also “hides” itself. it is, as bergum has alluded to, shrouded in mystery. as a result, we are called to the mystery of the topic, to do justice to the questions that it can raise in us, to approach it care-fully, with both curiosity and suspicion, suspense, and intent, discipline and free play. in hermeneutics, tenants with proper names inhabit topics; they are things of human concern, and also, things that have concern for us, that is, living things that literally make a difference in our lives. address, as experienced, can be a breathtaking and breath-sustaining gift. when it arrives it asks that the researcher suffer the mysteries of the topic and this means to put what they believe at risk, to be open to learning from risking what matters, and most importantly, to speak of this in human terms, to do well by “the tenants” that greet you at the portal. thus, the servitude demanded by a topic is not primarily methodical, but rather ethical in nature (caputo, 1993); it is a call of our conscience, that comes with an obligation to respond to the call of what should be done, and not simply, as in the natural sciences, what can be done. obligation is the event of someone; of something personal in the midst of this inarticulate hum…events happen anonymously, like the roar of the surf, while obligation is like the cry of a small child who has lost his way on the beach calling for help. (caputo, 1993, p. 246) moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 3 the obligation to respond to the call of the topic is not simply a question of "how do i broach my topic?” but rather, “how do i cultivate what is already there?" — existing, speaking, opinionated, teasing and teeming with mystery. in responding to this address, there is a sense of an opening, or as heidegger might have suggested, a clearing, and the promise of being transformed by a living, provocative conversation that was already underway. conversational topics, then, have entrails; they are historically located, and we must listen carefully to pick up on the entrails. in this way, the topics are not new; they are already at play. hermeneutic inquiry demands that, as late arrivers to a conversation, we both let what is at play move us forward, and that we join in moving it forward. the substance of a topic what constitutes a topic? in practice professions, such as nursing, social work, psychology, and education, topics are often grounded in the field of practice. they have a place, a geographical territory so to speak, in which they dwell. for example, a psychologist might be struck by the notion of shame in eating disorders, a nurse by the experiences of having nursed children who sometimes die, an educator by the coding and naming of “slow learners,” or a social worker by the issue of child abuse. practitioners suffer these things in their practice. within each practice, there are as many topics as there are questions, but not all topics are experienced as a form of address. even the ones that do address us are partially hidden from us because of our prejudices, as gadamer (1969/1989) would say, or to paraphrase heidegger (1962), by our practical involvement with the things themselves. to use his example, one cannot properly notice or understand running for the bus when one is running for the bus. one starts to notice a topic, when one is “pulled up short” (gadamer, 1969/1989), when we miss the bus, so to speak, and are left breathless in its disappearing exhaust. in the same way, one is not often aware of health except in its absence (gadamer, 1996). unless something like this happens to us – and we do not will it to happen we often continue in our practices in unquestioning ways, assuming taken-for-granted discourses and ways of being around what we do in everyday practice. after all, we have caught the bus many times have we not? we have been successful in our run. it is, however, the disruption of success in our everyday practices that allows a topic to emerge, in completely familiar, but also strange and disrupting ways. for example, one of the authors (moules, 2002, 2003, 2009a, 2009b) was involved in family therapy work and practiced using therapeutic letters as a routine part of the clinical work. it continued to amaze her to witness the power of the written communication in a practice that had its tradition in the power of talk, and yet the written communication seemed to have a different and sometimes even stronger influence. she was struck with how even family members who might not immediately been seen as particularly “literary,” were captivated by the letters and moved to extremes of keeping them in bedside drawers or, in one case, framing them. this disruption of the familiar and the kind of amazement that goes with it, a puzzlement, wondering, and passion for understanding, represents the call of topics. as we have said, discerning what constitutes a topic requires that we first listen to its call, and then to work out how we might best answer. at times, the topics are too immense and unanswermoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 4 able; these do not lend themselves to a hermeneutic study. if the topic is, for example, “why do children die?” one can imagine that this is not a question that any amount of hermeneutic research (or any other kind of research) could offer an answer. however, inside of that existential and unanswerable question lies other topics and questions that can be addressed, such as “how might we understand oncology nurses’ experiences of working with children who sometimes die?” or “what is it like for the parents of children who die, or the grandparents of children who die?” each of these topics is different, but the same in this way: each requires the “voice of the other” (risser, 1997). for us to understand, each requires that we engage with those who have lived through the experience so that we might learn from them. topics involve a phenomenon or sometimes many phenomena, yet hermeneutic research is not the same as pure phenomenological research in that the goal is not to essentialize, define, or even simply describe the topic. the goal is not to carve away at all the extremities of the phenomenon of interest to reach an essence or core, to achieve an uncontaminated description of it stripped of its context. rather, the desire is to conserve the topic in all of its complexity, in the words of caputo, “ to restore it to its original difficulty” (1987, p. 1). as stated, very often our practices go unnoticed and unexamined, lost to discourse, assumption, and involvement; often they remain in the state of being taken-for-granted. when the address of a topic arrives, it troubles something and problematizes it. when this happens, the work becomes about “exoticizing the domestic” (white, 1993, p. 35), taking what is assumed and unquestioned and looking at it as something new and exotic. this involves looking at it from fresh perspectives, trying to understand it differently, while still preserving the topic’s integrity, the whole of it, as it lives in the world. the clay bowl resting on the table in front of me meets my eyes with its curved and grainy surface. yet, i can only see one side of that surface the other side of the bowl is invisible, hidden by the side that faces me. in order to view that other side, i must pick up the bowl and turn it around in my hands, or else walk around the wooden table. yet, having done so, i can no longer see the first side of the bowl. surely i know that it still exists; i can even feel the presence of that aspects which the bowl now presents to the lamp on the far side of the table. yet, i myself am simply unable to see the whole of this bowl all at once. moreover, while examining its outer surface, i have caught only a glimpse of the smooth and finely glazed inside of the bowl. when i stand up to look down into that interior, which gleams with curved reflections from the skylight overhead, i can no longer see the sunglazed outer surface. this earthen vessel thus reveals aspects of its presence to me only by withholding other aspects of itself for further exploration. there can be no question of ever totally exhausting the presence of the bowl with my perception; its very existence as a bowl ensures that there are dimensions wholly inaccessible to me most obviously the patterns hidden between its glazed and unglazed surface, the interior density of its clay body. if i break it into pieces, in hopes of discovering these interior patterns or the delicate structure of its molecular dimensions, i will have destroyed its integrity as a bowl; far from coming to know it completely, i will simply have wrecked any possibility of coming to know it further, having traded the relation between myself and the bowl for a relation to a collection of fragments. (abram, 1996, p. 51) moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 5 in looking to a topic, to understand a topic while conserving its complexity, we are not searching for an essence; rather this is an act of truth-seeking of looking for what might be true in the topic. this does not mean to imply that there is one “truth” to be known about topics but rather that we stay true to the work of aletheia in unconcealing topics in all of their messiness and richness. the hermeneutic notion of truth we admit, up front, that any discussion of truth is difficult and tricky, partly because truth in research, and this holds for a lot of inquiry that would be called “qualitative,” is often thought of only as correspondence between thought and world, between an “inner” and “outer” representation of the thing itself. there is no inner and outer in hermeneutic research, in the sense of an unbridgeable chasm between self and world. we are, as heidegger (1927/1962) maintained, always in the world, and hermeneutic research is always about understanding, about what it means to be in the world in a particular way. this is to say that, as practitioners, we are deeply involved in our practices, and it is only through our practical, everyday involvement that the truth, that is, the meaning of something, becomes available at all (heidegger, 1927/1962; wrathall, 2013). truth, at least the truth about being human and human practice, is also tricky because it is located in time and place. it can and does change (and stay the same) over time and between places. hermeneutic truth is plural, not singular, in this way: there is not one right way to help all patients recover from cancer, for example, or a single method for helping every child learn to read. at the same time, not every way is right. we can get it wrong; we can make people sicker in trying to help them heal. we can make learning to read impossible; while trying to teach, we can deceive ourselves thoroughly and fall into untruth (wrathall, 2013) in the very pursuit of truth. the history of nursing and education is littered with such examples. finally (here at least), truth is tricky in hermeneutic work because it disappears as it appears. we never get “the whole truth and nothing but the truth,” because truth is both revealed to us and concealed from us at once, as is the bowl in the abram’s (1996) example above. this is why gadamer, following his teacher heidegger, appropriated the notion of truth as aletheia, for hermeneutic work. hermeneutic work is more about conservation than preservation. to preserve something is to hold it in all its sameness, to protect and save it from spoiling, and changing, to kill it, whereas to conserve something means to keep it alive, to keep it from being damaged, lost or wasted (preserve, conserve, n.d.). in our efforts to conserve a topic, to not allow it to be lost or forgotten as something simply accepted, the unconcealment and enlivening that comes with truth necessarily comes into play. hermeneutics is the practice of aletheia, the greek word for “the event of concealment and unconcealment” (caputo, 1987, p. 115). heidegger referred to aletheia as unhiddenness, in relation to that which is hidden (coltman, 1998). aletheia first occurs when we are addressed, when something opens which was once closed, when we become aware of something that was not there as being there. aletheia can be represented by the metaphor of opening the lid of a well, of flipping the lid open and letting it rest so one can look into what lies beneath it. in this opening of one side, another side is closed, for with every opening there is closure and some things are necessarily left behind. aletheia comes from lethe, which is a river in hades, the water of which when drunk produces oblivion of the past; thus it is called the “river of moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 6 forgetting” (hoad, 1986). lethe is hiding, concealment, amnesia, and it is also tied, etymologically, to the word lethal. aletheia works against what is dead; it is about enlivening and remembering. aletheia is the clearing of things into the mystery beneath; it is the “ongoing, historical, epochal process by which things emerge from concealment into unconcealment” (caputo, 1987, p. 177). the three meanings then of aletheia are a portal or opening, an enlivening, and a remembering. when topics address us, they open something, they call on us to remember why it is that certain things matter, and they ask us to bring these things alive in the here and now of our lives. the centrality of the notion of phronesis to hermeneutic work gadamer was committed to staying close to concrete, factual life. his approach focused on understanding life as it is lived and, for gadamer, that meant achieving an understanding of how to act well in concrete, particular circumstances. this is why he based his notion of understanding on the form of knowledge the greeks called phronesis, because it provided him with a notion of practical knowledge, knowledge in action, that remains experiential through and through (davey, 2006). dunne (1993) elaborated: …phronesis is a habit of attentivenesss that makes the resources of one’s past experience flexibly available to one, and at the same time allows the present situation to ‘unconceal’ its own particular significance which it may do comfortably within the terms of one’s experience or else only by evincing as insight, which while it could not occur without one’s past experience, still transcends, and so enriches it. (pp. 305-306) so while it is true that we can be struck by something, addressed in a way that opens a topic for us, it is only through a “habit of attentiveness” that we can keep the topic open, that we can follow the direction implied in the questions that arise, and learn from the event of being addressed. the role of deliberation in this process is key, and holds an important position in gadamer’s (1989) description of phronesis. in the following, we offer examples of the work of phronesis in its experiential understanding of “life as it is lived” in everyday practices. examples of topics and how they arrived example a doubled and silenced: grandparents’ experiences of childhood cancer (moules, laing, mccaffrey, tapp, & strother, 2012; moules, mccaffrey, laing, tapp, & strother, 2012) working in pediatric oncology, both laing and moules know firsthand how cancer is a family affair. childhood cancer affects, not only a cell, but a body, a life, relationships, and communities. there has been much research done on the experiences of siblings of children with cancer and parents, but very little attention to the extended family, in this case, the grandparents. a part of the address of this topic was that, a few years ago, moules had the experience of having her only child in the intensive care unit due to an acute cardiac crisis. he is also the only grandchild of her parents and she became aware of how her parents were not only suffering and worrying for their grandson, but also their own daughter and her fears and concerns. they, however, did not want to burden her with their worries so this doubled concern was suffering silently and alone. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 7 grandparents of children with cancer live this duality and the study invited voice to an experience that had been, to some extent, silenced. example b “it’s not just camp”: understanding the meaning of children’s cancer camps for children and families (laing, 2012; laing, 2013; laing & moules, 2013; laing & moules, 2014; laing & moules (in press); laing & moules (in press)). laing credits a short film about cancer camp, shown in the second year of her undergraduate nursing degree, as the impetus to get into the field of pediatric oncology. it was a simple film showing children with cancer attending camp, supplemented by interviews with several children, and nurses who were attending as camp counselors. while the details are forgettable, she never forgot that moment in time when, as she described, “pediatric oncology chose me.” as she traversed through her clinical career in pediatric oncology, laing was struck by how important camp was for kids with cancer and their families. she never understood why camp was so important, why the kids started talking about summer camp shortly after christmas trying to gauge the likelihood they could go the same week as their friends, or that they wouldn’t be too sick to go for one of the weeks. while she did not understand why, the fact that camp seemed such a profound experience for most kids and families always stuck with her. after deciding to take on doctoral studies, and struggling at first to identify a topic for research, laing eventually came back to the idea of camp. she wanted to understand what it was that made camp so special, so important for these families, and why it mattered. it was camp, after all, that had claimed her in the first place. example c investigating the disappearance of the “slow learner” (williamson, doctoral study in progress) (williamson & field, 2014; williamson & paul, 2012a, 2012b). as someone who, as a student, struggled academically in ways that would align with alberta’s current definitions of educational disability, as a parent of a child with a down syndrome and as a teacher/coordinator of disability services at a large urban high school, williamson had been experiencing disability for most of his life. his impetus for entering doctoral studies was to interpret the assumptions and practices involved in working with slow learners, a particular category of students who are predicted by way of intelligence testing to struggle in school but for whom the albertan special education system has granted no formal support. williamson has been teaching in an instructional tier aimed at these students for many years and has come to see how this category on the border of disability exposes the frequent rigidity of educational thinking about disability and intellectual potential. though tools meant to address student diversity and disability categories can, ironically, become unwieldy, imposing further restraint on a system that is already too inflexible for all students. despite this, williamson has also been privileged to bear witness to the transcendent moments when generous teaching practices meet engaged learners and disability categories, at least in their deficit framings, disappear. it is the appearing and disappearing of categories that finally called out to williamson, who is also a life-long fan of detective fiction, as way of framing the complexities of this topic. he has chosen to present his research in this area as a detective story: “the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner.” moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 8 example d understanding nurse-patient relationships on acute mental health units, buddhist perspectives (mccaffrey, 2012; mccaffrey, raffin bouchal, & moules, 2012). while working in an interdisciplinary position on a mental health unit, mccaffrey was struck by contrasting perceptions of how nurses did their work. nurses saw themselves as having good therapeutic relationships with patients, while team members including occupational therapists, social workers and psychiatrists often felt frustrated that nurses seemed under-informed about patients and their work with them was undirected. after starting to explore more deeply the question of how nurses work with patients on mental health units, mccaffrey became aware of how much his nursing practice was informed by an earlier experience of working in a therapeutic community, in which relationship as the medium of care and change was paramount. the topic was, at the same time, formed by a study of zen buddhist traditions of thought and practice, which offered new ways of looking at nursing. obvious affinities between buddhism and nursing, such as practicing with suffering and compassion, became a starting point for deeper and more complex exploration. example e marked by loss: pediatric oncology nurses’ experiences of the death of a child (morck, doctoral study in progress). morck’s (2009) previous work, which will be described in the following section was looking at the emotional marks that happen to psychiatric nurses after hearing stories of trauma and suffering. as her clinical work shifted to the area of oncology rather than mental health, she became addressed by the impact on pediatric oncology nurses when children die as they can do in this population. the work of rashotte (2005) in dwelling with the stories that haunt us spoke to her about the ways that loss haunts and marks, not just the family of children with cancer, but also those professionals who care for them. speaking for the address how do you write about address? topics start somewhere and most often they start with an instance. this instance needs to be described in the work as a way of locating and populating the topic with a living example that shows it for all its power. an example of this is the paper published in the journal of applied hermeneutics, “isn’t all oncology hermeneutic?” (moules, jardine, mccaffrey, & brown, 2013). although the paper does not reflect a research study, it is a response to the critique that has been made about the relatively small numbers of participants that are often used in hermeneutic research, and an argument about the fit of hermeneutics as a research method that attempts to understand practice and phenomena that arise within practice. the authors of this work start by describing an instance that gave rise to the discussion – an arrival of the topic. in this case, the topic was about hermeneutics, numbers, power, and verification through numbers in contrast to the “fecundity of the individual case” (jardine, 1992). throughout the paper then, the discussion of theory and philosophy had to also be instantiated and the authors did so through two very powerful descriptions of the experience of an oncologist and his patients. in the introduction of topics in hermeneutic research, most often there is a story around the arrival of the topic, a narrative of dialectic with the topic and a reason as to why the topic matters moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 9 to the researcher and an instantiation of the meaningfulness and call of the topic. in a master’s thesis hermeneutic study by morck (2009) entitled “right there, in the midst of it with them”: impacts of the therapeutic relationship on nurses, she was attempting to understand the topic of the impacts on mental health nurses of hearing stories of pain, suffering, and trauma. in the thesis, she recounted being a young, new nurse and starting her work in a hospital inpatient mental health unit. very early in her career, she recalled encountering one of the patients she was working with cowering in the corner of her room. as she approached and engaged in conversation with the patient, she was to hear a terrible story of abuse where the patient claimed that the rain outside the window smelled of urine. following this seemingly incomprehensible statement, morck gently knelt down with the patient and asked her more about how the rain smelled like urine. the patient proceeded to tell her an event she remembered: she was five years old, just raped by her father and his friend, thrown down the steps, urinated on, and then they left out the door. it was raining outside. morck discussed how this instance was one of many that had a profound impact on her as a new and young nurse hearing of such suffering. hearing stories like this one and countless others was then the address that called her to her research, a topic full of complexity and obligation to do well with it. topics cannot just matter to the researcher alone; they must be something relevant in the world. they are not selfish indulgences, trying to work out something individually for individual curiosity and gain, but rather a working out that is meaningful in relation to the phenomena that surround it. it is not just morck who experienced the weight of hearing and bearing stories of pain and suffering but other psychiatric nurses who hear and bear the same responsibility and it is not just psychiatric nurses. social workers bear witness to stories of violence and abuse. teachers hear stories of children’s child abuse, stories of torture and escape from war torn counties. “vicarious trauma” (see for e.g., figley,1995; mathieu, 2011) is not owned by one profession. asking questions of the address: developing research questions out of topics, one needs to narrow and focus a research question. in hermeneutics, there is a particular kind of flavor to the question. one would not necessarily seek an ontological question such as “what is something,” as hermeneutics is not in search of phenomenological essences. it is not intended to shave off extremities to narrow something down to a definition of what it is or is not. rather than definition or explanation, it is in search of understanding and interpretation, looking for possible and good ways to understand a particular topic. more hermeneutic in intent than a “what is” question are questions that imply interpretation. a question such as “how might we understand the meaning of children’s cancer camps for children and families?” would be a question that aims for meaning, interpretation, and understanding rather than assessment or measurement of impact. in a similar way, hermeneutics does not set out to develop theories or templates so a research topic that might be described as, for example, “developing a theory of new social workers learning” would not be consistent with the way we have taken up hermeneutic research. the title of the study and the guiding research question then must show integrity with the philosophy that informs it. this is an important point of congruency. if one develops a question that is moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 10 unanswerable from a hermeneutic perspective, such as “why do children die?,” the credibility of the work is compromised and incomprehensible. the process of determining one definitive research question is often one that is under the gaze and demand of funding bodies and granting bodies, but in many ways, it is counterintuitive to hermeneutics. questions beget questions and the answer to a question is only one response. gadamer (1960/1989) suggested that hermeneutics is the answer to a question that could have been answered differently. the research question that began the research is sometimes forced to change, given the shifts in thinking that arise as the researcher engages with the data. research questions are only intended to guide the research and serve the topic and often as the study progresses, the question becomes clearer. speaking to the address: what constitutes data in hermeneutic research? understanding begins with an address but it only just begins there. understanding about a topic has to be cultivated. everything is potential data if it helps to further the interpretation of the questionability of the topic. data may come in the form of photographs, art, poetry, textbooks, policy, newspaper articles, scholarly literature, philosophical texts, literary texts, conversations, or any other medium. address spreads outwards as the interconnections of the topic become apparent. it is another mark of the relevance of effective hermeneutic work when a topic is seen to live in worlds of shared cultures. one can conduct a hermeneutic study without the traditional qualitative method of interviewing participants, but there has to be a good demonstration that researchers have gone beyond only their own perception and reflections of the topic. very often however, this kind of research strives towards involving conversation, the latin of which is “conversa” which means to turn around together. gadamer (1960/1989) took up the notion of dialogue as central to hermeneutics. hermeneutics is dialectic, a “fusion of horizons” which cannot happen alone. for example, to understand a topic such as grandparents’ experiences of childhood cancer, there are many portals of understanding but the most obvious is by engaging in research conversations with grandparents directly. as mentioned, often in hermeneutic research, data is collected through interviews. in conducting interviews, one must consider the issue of the selection of participants, and the nature, skill, and focus of interviews to collect rich data that is fertile for interpretive analysis, and very necessary in the conduct of this kind of research. understanding only begins with an address; the address then summons the researcher to move into the conduct of the study in order to obtain answers to the questions that arise. summary in the bigger picture of the conduct of hermeneutic inquiry, we start here with the experience of “address” the ways one is called by topics, invited into positions of curiosity and wonder, tethered by what is known, and untethered by the possibilities of what remains to be discovered. address is the call to disand uncovery, as well as the call to recovery of what was forgotten. it moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 11 is the beacon that summons and lures us to topics, but also the quiet warning and reminder that we are obligated to do well by them. references abram, d. (1996). the spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more than human world. new york, ny: vintage books. bergum, v. (1991). being a phenomenological researcher. in j. morse (ed.), qualitative nursing research: a contemporary dialogue (2nd ed.) (pp. 43-57). newbury park, ca; sage. bruns, g. l. (1992). hermeneutics ancient and modern. london, uk: yale university press. caputo, j.d. (1987). radical hermeneutics: repetition, deconstruction and the hermeneutic project. bloomington, in: indiana university press. caputo, j.d. (1993). against ethics: contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. bloomington, in: indiana university press. coltman, r. (1998). the language of hermeneutics: gadamer and heidegger in dialogue. albany, ny: suny. conserve. (n.d.). in merriam-webster’s online dictionary. retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conserve davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: suny press. dunne, j. (1993). back to the rough ground: practical judgment and the lure of technique. notre dame, ia: university of notre dame press. figley, charles r. (1995). compassion fatigue: coping with secondary traumatic stress disorder in those who treat the traumatized. new york, ny: routledge, taylor & francis group. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.) (j. weinshemer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (1996). the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age. standford, ca: stanford university press. heidegger, m. (1927/1962). being and time (j.m.e. robinson, trans.). new york, ny: harper and row. hoad, t.f (ed.). (1986). the concise oxford dictionary of english etymology. new york, ny: oxford university press. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 12 jardine, d.w. (1992). the fecundity of the individual case: considerations of the pedagogic heart of interpretive work. journal of philosophy of education, 26(1), 51-61. laing, c.m. (2012). at play, in play. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 6, http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5474766 laing, c.m. (2013). “it’s not just camp”: understanding the meaning of children’s cancer camps for children and families. unpublished doctoral research, university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. laing, c.m., & moules, n.j. (2013). the island of misfit toys. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 8, http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5js9hq4 laing, c.m., & moules, n.j. (2014). stories from cancer camp: tales of glitter and gratitude. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 3, http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5qf8k16 laing, c.m., & moules, n.j. (2014). children’s cancer camps: a sense of community, a sense of family. journal of family nursing, 20(2), 185-203. laing, c.m., & moules, n.j. (in press). children’s cancer camps: a way to understand grief differently. omega: journal of death and dying. mathieu, f. (2011). the compassion fatigue workbook: creative tools for transforming compassion fatigue and vicarious traumatization. new york, ny: routledge, taylor & francis group. mccaffrey, g.p. (2012). nurse patient relationship and buddhist thought. unpublished doctoral thesis. university of calgary. calgary, ab, canada. mccaffrey, g.p., raffin bouchal, s., & moules, n.j. (2012). buddhist thought and nursing: a hermeneutic exploration. nursing philosophy, 13, 87-97. morck, a. (2009). “right there, in the midst of it with them”: impacts of the therapeutic relationship on nurses. unpublished master’s thesis. university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. moules, n.j. (2002). nursing on paper: therapeutic letters in nursing practice. nursing inquiry, 9(2), 104-113. moules, n.j. (2003). therapy on paper: therapeutic letters and the tone of relationship. journal of systemic therapies, 22(1), 33-49. moules, n.j. (2009a). therapeutic letters in nursing: examining the character and influence of the written word in clinical work with families experiencing illness. journal of family nursing, 15(1), 31-49. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 7 13 moules, n.j. (2009b). the past and future of therapeutic letters: family suffering and healing words. journal of family nursing, 15(1), 102-111. moules, n.j., jardine, d.w., mccaffrey, g.p., & brown, c. (2013). ‘isn’t all oncology hermeneutic?” journal of applied hermeneutics. article 3. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5w95141 moules, n.j., laing, c.m., mccaffrey, g., tapp, d.m., & strother, d. (2012). grandparents’ experiences of childhood cancer, part one: doubled and silenced. journal of pediatric oncology nursing, 29(3), 119-132. moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., laing, c.m., tapp, d.m., & strother, d. (2012). grandparents’ experiences of childhood cancer, part two: the need for support. journal of pediatric oncology nursing, 29(3), 133-141. preserve. (n.d.). in merriam-webster’s online dictionary. retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/preserve rashotte, j. (2005). dwelling with the stories that haunt us: building a meaningful nursing practice. nursing inquiry, 12(1), 34-42. risser, j. (1997). hermeneutics and the voice of the other. albany, ny: suny. white, m. (1993). deconstruction and therapy. in s. gilligan & r. price (eds.), therapeutic conversations (pp. 22-61). new york, ny: w.w. norton. williamson, w.j. (2012). codes. canadian journal of disability studies, north america, 1, may. http://cjds.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/cjds/article/view/47/50. williamson, w.j., & field, j.c. (2014). the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 4. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy53b5wq7 williamson, w.j., & paul, w.j. (2012a). the level playing field: unconcealing diploma exam accommodation policy. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 13. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5f766p2 williamson, j., & paul. j. (2012b). the “slow learner” as a mediated construct. canadian journal of disability studies, 1(3), august. http://cjds.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/cjds/article/view/59 wrathall, m. a. (ed.). (2013). the cambridge companion to heidegger’s being and time. new york, ny: cambridge university press microsoft word davey corrected proof final.docx corresponding author: nicholas davey, phd email: jrndavey@dundee.ac.uk journal of applied hermeneutics november 10, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 a hermeneutics of practice: philosophical hermeneutics and the epistemology of participation nicholas davey gadamer’s “philosophical hermeneutics” leaves several unresolved questions inviting further development. (1) if scientific methodology is no longer the counter-balance to questions of procedure in the humanities, what can hermeneutics offer the sciences in grappling with the absence of certainty? (2) why does gadamer not develop the notion that understanding is a type of movement? what is understanding’s seemingly perpetual disquiet? (3) gadamer’s case that understanding is an event is part of his rejection of the kantian thesis that “knowing” is grounded in subjective consciousness. the question of how such events are generated is unresolved. placing the event of understanding in a linguistic horizon establishes its ontological pre-requisite but offers no insight into the mechanisms that have to be in place to facilitate its emergence. this paper will suggest that the notion of practice (itself a philosophical theme not extensively discussed in gadamer) offers three possible answers to these questions. (1) practice evolves notions of certitude other than those that are strictly epistemological. (2) practice is often driven by a quest for completion (vollzug) which proves instrumentally disruptive and a means to new insight. the drive for completion is a candidate for generating understanding’s disquiet. (3) practice facilitates not so much a fusion but a collision of horizons capable of generating unexpected transformations of understanding. all three answers suggest the development of philosophical hermeneutics into what will be termed a participatory hermeneutics. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 2 aims what is the future of hermeneutics? the aim of this paper is fourfold. 1. to use a discussion of the notion of practice to contribute to the current debate about the future of hermeneutics. 2. to present a discussion of practice as an element of a much larger project concerning recent philosophical challenges to both the methodological legitimacy of both hermeneutics and the cultural legitimacy of the humanities. 3. to confront those challenges in an attempt to restore faith in the cognitive content and cultural relevance of both hermeneutics and the humanities. 4. to offer a new hermeneutical approach to the understanding of the transformative effects of the practices that constitute these disciplines. the unifying argument concerns the need for philosophical hermeneutics to embrace an epistemology of participation to the end of re-building a notion of the hermeneutic subject in the context of a debate about the nature of practice loosely described here as those disciplines which depend primarily upon knowledge by acquaintance (savoir). the unresolved one of the unresolved questions in philosophical hermeneutics concerns the cognitive role of the subject. gadamer’s hostility to the kantian notion of subjectivity as the ground of knowing is well known. what is needed, however, is something that gadamer’s thought points to but does not fully articulate i.e., the notion of the subject as participant rather than adjudicator or judge. philosophical hermeneutics self-announces with a kantian question: what are the pre-conditions of understanding? the answer is shaped ontologically and derives from heidegger’s conception of being as eventual: the preconditions of understanding are ontological including tradition, language, and culturally received subject-matters (sachen). this, however, is no answer: the epistemological question is displaced by an ontological assertion. the consequence is twofold. (1) language becomes an all powerful super-subject (koegler, 1996) and (2) the role of subjectivity in understanding denied (kelly, 2004).1 this creates an obvious difficulty. if language generates substantive undecideables (polyvalent meaning), how are the undecided possibilities decided and acted on? are they self-selecting? arguably, practice invokes a notion of participatory intervention. does talk of participatory intervention imply a return to a notion of autonomous subjectivity? arguably, not. talk of subjectivity traditionally implies a co-relative notion of objectivity. however, contemporary science is increasingly calling into question the notion of an independent extra-mental reality. the notion of an “out-there” that is an objective co-relative to subjectivity is becoming unsustainable. what is emerging is a conception of actuality in which all 1 see koegler (1996, p. 116) kelly (2004, p. 103) 2 friedrich nietzsche; “the assumption of one single subject is perhaps unnecessary: perhaps it is just as kelly (2004, p. 103) davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 3 entities are to varying degrees creatures of possibility. we might intuit this “new” objectivity as the sum of interactions between living processes. the conceptual links between interaction, hermeneutics and a participatory hermeneutics call out for development. this is the basis for the argument that hermeneutics should develop a participatory epistemology. from subject to participant and so, with regard to resolving the unresolved within philosophical hermeneutics, the following is an outline of a participatory epistemology. 1. the participant-subject is always ‘positioned,’ always a part situated in a larger nexus or whole. 2. the participant subject is an embodied subject, not standing apart from the sum of relations that constitutes its environment but simultaneously acting on and being acted on by it. 3. such a subject is always located within a situation that is both historical and linguistic and, in gadamer’s words, “to throw light on it (the situation) is a task that is never entirely completed” (1989, p. 269). 4. to be is to do: participatory-subjects are in effect clusters of activities, not beings that act but actions that have a being insofar as they are effective agencies: their essence is a consequential construct, an effect of and not a pre-requisite for action. 5. subject-participants are, to use nietzsche’s phrase, multiplicities that act as subjects but are not actual subjects. they are processes of assemblage or com-posure that gather received events and possible courses of action into one constantly revising story, identity, or practice.2 the consequences of a “positioned” subject for hermeneutical thought are suggestive. they imply that: 1. the experience of an embodied and hence situated subject is multi-registered, and not to be reduced to any singular mode of interpretation. though it may reflect a point of view, it cannot be reduced to a single perspective. 2. the situation of a participant agency is not subject to final description: if each and every cultural positioning is linguistic, its character can never be fully articulated. in language there is no final description of any position albeit that language will always seek the finality that is constantly inferred from it.3 3. because embodied experience will also be an experience of the temporal, that experience will also be perspectival i.e. characteristic of a specific temporal, spatial and cultural location. a given perspective is rarely self-transparent though its characteristics are often clearer when discerned from another perspective. there is always more to a positional centre than a singu 2 friedrich nietzsche; “the assumption of one single subject is perhaps unnecessary: perhaps it is just as permissible to assume a multiplicity of subjects whose interaction and struggle is the basis of our thought and our consciousness in general? … my hypothesis: the subject as multiplicity…the continual transitoriness and fleetingness of the subject”. nietzsche (1968, section 493). 3 gadamer contends in this context: “hermeneutic philosophy, as i envision it, does not understand itself on an “absolute position but as a path of experiencing. its modesty consists in the fact that there is no higher principle than this: “holding oneself open to the conversation” (gadamer, 2007, p. 34). davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 4 lar perspective can imagine. that participatory epistemology should (indeed, ought to) be invoked in favour of inter-disciplinary research is no surprise. 4. the situated subject is a dialogical, negotiable being. the other can see things about my perspective i cannot see: i need the other to present me with perspectives enabling me to think differently about the possibilities within my own. each (dialogical) position is unfinished and unfinishable, “constantly under pressure” to open itself to what is other than itself.4 5. the situated-subject is grounded in what transcends it. if a position’s character and possibilities depend upon the nexus of historical, linguistic and cultural horizons it is placed within, each “position” is dependent the sum of inter-actions it is part of. these five axioms of hermeneutical positioning have an interesting consequence: they suggest that reflection upon the nature of practice should be (or, stronger, is) the heart of a “philosophical” consideration of hermeneutics. the reason to support the claim and thereby strengthen the link between participatory epistemology and hermeneutics is as follows. 1. practices (in the various forms of understanding, interpretation, representation, creativity) presuppose positioning in the ontological sense outlined. 2. positioning within culture and language implies part-icipation. 3. participation is interactive: the part can change the character of the sum (whole): speaking matters because it changes matters. 4. practices are, then, vehicles of transformation, forming and yet formed by their participants. so, thinking through the relationship between participatory epistemology and hermeneutics opens three conceptual routes to articulating a hermeneutics of practice. towards a hermeneutics of practice the three routes to the prioritisation of practice as a hermeneutical thematic entail: 1. the replacement of the cognitive subject by participatory centres, that is subjects ontologically formed in and through practice. 2. practice considered as formative of the narrative-self or hermeneutic identity (ricouer), it is a source of effective and confident inter-action with other such subjects. 3. the collapse of the geistes-naturwissenschaft distinction, a corollary of which is the replacement of epistemological certainty with practical confidence. as these three routes conceptually entail each other, i shall deal with them collectively under the sub-themes of practice and its formative powers, uncertainty, and confidence. 4 see williams (2014, p. 122) davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 5 practice, uncertainty, and confidence “the most precious thing in life is its uncertainty” (yoshida kenko, essays in idleness, no. 7.) paradoxically, philosophical hermeneutics is built on an abandoned but still influential distinction between the certainties of science and the alleged uncertainties of the humanities. wilhelm dilthey is specifically criticized by gadamer for looking to the sciences for the certainties that life cannot provide: “dilthey’s need for something firm is explicitly the (his) need for protection from the frightful realities of life. …he expects the uncertainty and unsureness of life to be overcome not so much by the stability that the experience of life provides as by science,” (gadamer, 1989, p. 239). the question becomes how to reconcile “uncertainty” about existence with “confidence in existence”? an answer to the question indicates how practice can be understood as formative, indeed, as initiating a form of bildung. gadamer (1989) contends that “the certainties of science are different from the certainty acquired in life …” (p. 238) and, what’s more, “the unsureness of life is to be overcome by the experience of life that the experience of life provides …” (p. 239). what are these non-epistemic certainties and how does life provide them? the key to this is the expedition of practice itself. gadamer invokes tradition as a non-epistemic source of certainty or, rather, confidence. “tradition in the form of morals, religion and law, rests (in contrast to methodical doubt), on a knowledge that life has of itself” (gadamer, 1989, p. 238). uncertainty may be assuaged by initiation into the firmer structures of inherited thought though since when, it might be objected, is tradition a guarantor of stability? (dilthey’s loss of faith in theological tradition is a case in point). however, it is not the “values” transmitted by tradition that inspire confidence. rather, it is the practices the commitment to modes of doing that nurtures it. this suggests that it is practice-acquired-confidence that displaces the (unrealisable) epistemic quest for certainty.5 what is it that builds confidence in existence and displace the dissipating nihilism of hyperbolic doubt? what can we trust to and be confident of? gadamer answers, we can trust to language and tradition. the claim is an obvious re-working of heidegger’s notion of the existential condition of geworfenheit: the finding of ourselves inexplicably cast into the contingencies of language and cultural tradition. however, “certainties” are not simply acquired by immersion in tradition and language alone. the certainties of life are won: they are achievements, not the certainties of knowing but those of doing, of participation, and of involvement. the certainties of life are those emergent certainties won through confident engagement with various practices. practice forms the practitioner. practice is formative. practices involve repetition, memory, adjustment, failure and success: upon these rhythms the confidence to perform is built. participatory engagement with a range of practices enables the capacity and confidence to engage and develop. tradition and cultural horizons are the preconditions of practice but they do not build the certainties gadamer speaks of. it is the engage 5 the word confidence is built around the word faith (fide): to confide is it to have faith in who one confides in. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 6 ment with practice and the self-insight it affords that grounds the certainties and confidence of the practiced performer, whether artist, doctor or scientist. certainty and confidence is won through participation and engagement and not through the classical routes of epistemological detachment. this suggests that it is through practices that the identity of the practitioner emerges. if practices involve repetition, memory, adjustment, failure and success, a provisional narrative identity emerges. the individual centre (the situated subject) achieves a practical point of selfcomposure: the individual formation is a composition, an integration achieved in and through the skills of practice, a composition only arrived at indirectly. such a composition is a narrative identity: a centre of possibilities which is always open. this establishes a conceptual link with the notion of a situated subject. it is from within my practice that i have something to say, and can speak to that which allows me to speak. my narratively established identity offers direction and anticipation. living narratives are by definition on-going, incomplete, temporal projects. they offer a unique point of orientation inflected by their past and their implicit future (how they might unravel in the both the positive and negative sense). the point is that it is the poise and assuredness of the accomplished practitioner that affords a relatively stable narrative identity. however, we are always vulnerable to what we have confidence in. the vulnerability of practical understanding the poise and assuredness of the accomplished practitioner affords a degree of fulfilment. the confident practitioner is recognized as an effective member of a community of practitioners. yet such fulfilment is always momentary, local, and can be undermined at any moment. modes of narrative understanding, as well as analogical forms of reasoning and understanding, are particularly subject to internal deconstruction. the practical or narrative identity which participation in a practice affords is at the same time vulnerable to being deconstructed by the same horizons of meaning that enable its emergence in the first place. being a “situated subject” is not only to be enabled but also to be threatened by the linguistic and historical worlds one is located in. narrative identities are vulnerable to the infinite varieties of description (or counter-narratives) that being in a language world affords. narrative identities are “vulnerable” because they are connected with several horizons of anticipation and expectation. i might build a pattern of sense around certain linguistic meanings. the polyvalence of all meaning suggests that the same signs and symbols when placed in another pattern of sense can disrupt the pattern i have built. the practical identity that participation in linguistic horizons affords is at the same time vulnerable to the very horizons that enable it. there is an inevitable dialecticity to our participating in a sum of inter-active relations: what they enable (the emergence of a position), they can equally disable (deconstruct): what language gives, language can take away. an account of this dynamic is missing from philosophical hermeneutics, a striking omission in need of address. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 7 what keeps understanding moving? there is no account of this problem in gadamer’s hermeneutics and it is a question which must be confronted if we are to consider the question of understanding’s transformational power. having established that understanding, interpretation, and representation are practices, what makes such practices inherently unstable and vulnerable to change? returning to the discussion of narratives, narratives involve expectations and projections. in a sense, all narratives confess their unrealised nature. narratives are on-going stories: there is much within them that remains possible. narratives house intuitions of (albeit unrealisable) completeness. this exposes a formal tension in gadamer’s hermeneutics between epistemological completeness and aesthetic completeness (vollzug). formally, there is no end, no definitive, no final interpretation able to close a narrative. the reasons for this are clear: (1) the infinity of language horizons makes the task of interpretation endless, (2) the problem of incommensurablity (no interpretation can be fully adequate to its subject-matter) renders formal completion in interpretation impossible, and (3) the fact that participatory epistemology cannot transcend and fix the sum of world constituting relations means that other interpretations are always possible. yet there is a distinction between seeking for the (final) meaning of something (epistemological closure) and seeking for something that can bring meaningful (aesthetic closure). the artwork offers an appropriate model. artworks have a “sense”: no lines of meaning scatter within them. they are “closed circles of meaning, in which everything is fulfilled” (gadamer, 1989, p. 101) so that “more becomes known than is already known” (1989, p. 102). what comes to completion (vollzug) within an artwork is not the infinity of (indeterminate) meanings underwriting it. to the contrary, an artwork takes singular aspects from a subject-matter’s infinite horizon of possibilities and weaves them into a “meaningful whole” enabling the recognition of something as something with “its chance and variable circumstances” (gadamer, 1989, p. 102) removed. an artwork does not concretise all its possible determinations of meaning: a determinate set of possibilities is selected and rendered “whole.” it becomes seen as “aesthetically complete” (1989, p. 102), that is, … seen as “something” as if for the first time. the vorgriff der vollkommenheit emerges, then, as an hermeneutic a priori, an analytic condition of any experience of coherence. the anticipation of completeness is a consequence of interpretive engagement with the openended possibilities within a horizon. translating them into intelligible sequential structures, establishes narrative forms where none were previously were perceived. the anticipation is, in effect, that intuitive sense for where a work is going. the quest for aesthetic completeness within a practice is a quest for what might give sense to the indeterminacies at play within that practice. it is, we argue, the quest for aesthetic completeness that drives understanding’s disquiet. this gives an explanation of why aesthetic experience plays such a foundational role in philosophical hermeneutics. conclusion i have argued that a future for philosophical hermeneutics lies in the direction of a hermeneutics of practice. practices are, we contend, forms of “sense-making.” they represent different ways davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 8 of organising the indeterminacies of human experience. as modes of “sense-making,” they assume and pursue a completion (vollkommenheit) of meaningfulness. this brings us to a seminal point: it is not what a practice pursues that matters but that it pursues it. to put the point another way, it is often the emergent insights that a practice generates by default rather than the ones it anticipates that prove transformative. the condition of this possibility is ontological rather than epistemological. the situated practitioner or participatory subject is linguistically and culturally positioned. such positioning is always shaped explicitly and implicitly by the cultural and historical horizons that define it: explicit in that the horizons set the initial orientation of the practitioner and implicit in that orientation is subject to being changed by the emergence of unrealised nuances of meaning from within those horizons. it is a mistake to think of such positioning in a singular way, as if being situated only involved a single linguistic or historical horizon. the situated practitioner is more a point of transection between a variety of horizons; personal, professional, linguistic, literary, national, social, and philosophical. arguably, philosophical hermeneutics simplifies the number of horizons at play within understanding and as a consequence underestimates the transformative educational capacity of hermeneutical engagement. the situated nature of understanding means that it is always at a juncture of a variety of individual and cultural horizons. what enables transmission between different horizons concerns the formal operation of simile, metaphor, analogy, and the place holding function of concepts. because of the formal operations of language and thought, being situated as a participatory subject is always to be subject to having one’s understanding challenged and transformed. understanding is always at a juncture. broader cultural meanings presently unknown to me can impact on those within my own narrative and issues of personal narrative can unexpectedly transform how a wider cultural concern is grasped. to be a participant, to be positioned, is to be simultaneously open to deconstruction or re-construction in one horizon precisely because of its linguistic and conceptual connectivity with others. the quest for vollzug and vollkommenheit is instrumental in occasioning such orientational shifts. gadamer rightly insists that hermeneutical understanding is not a matter of grasping facts or intentions but a question of acquiring a sense of where an argument is going, a sense of what a work or practice is aiming at even though such ambition may not have, as yet, been achieved. having an anticipatory sense of where a project or a narrative might take us is key. in other words, although understanding may have a singular object (making sense of a particular text), understanding is never singular. we bring to any engagement a range of expectations and anticipations deriving from a variety of commitments. bringing to completion what remains at play within a narrative is key for, as argued above, it is the pursuit rather than the pursued that is critical. it is what the pursuit of completeness in one horizon inadvertently puts into play in other associated horizons of meaning that matters. because no horizon of meaning whether personal or historical can exhaust the possibilities for meaningfulness within it, the pursuit of completeness in one horizon may impact upon another, prompting unexpected and transformative patterns of sense to arise. each humanities discipline practises the impossible: the pursuit of an anticipated completeness (vollkommenheit). and yet, it is only in the controlled pursuit of the impossible that the unexdavey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 9 pectedly possible can arise. in the horizons of language where the as yet unsaid can be as eloquent as the spoken, “things are always waiting to happen” and those things can be “gamechangers,” serendipitously rather than methodologically arrived insights capable of transforming a framework of understanding. hermeneutically constituted practices venture, then, controlled risk: the risk the over-turning of established narrative identities; the gain extending old identities in new ways or establishing new practices altogether. considered ontologically, a hermeneutics of practice is the key to understanding the transformative capacities of the humanities. we conclude that practices are forms of “sense-making.” they situate a participatory subject in horizons of linguistic and historical possibility. practices represent different ways of organizing the indeterminacies of human experience. as modes of “sense-making,” practices assume and pursue a completion (vollkommenheit) of meaningfulness. it is not what the practice pursues but that it pursues it that matters. the pursuit of interpretation’s end aesthetic completeness is but a means to induce a key effect i.e., achieving that transformation of understanding which is, arguably, the primary end of hermeneutics and the humanities (increasing the range of existential possibilities). in gadamerian terms, to play one must be in play for it is only by playing that one can put into play what is not yet in play. this is what a participatory hermeneutics demonstrates. references gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed., j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). london, uk: continuum. gadamer, h.g. (2007). the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings. (r. e. palmer, trans.). evanston, il: northwestern university press kelly, m. (2004). a critique of gadamer’s aesthetics. in b. krajewski (ed.), gadamer’s repercussions: reconsidering philosophical hermeneutics (pp. 103-122). berkeley, ca: university of california press. kenko, y. (1967). essays in idleness. the tsurezuregusa of kenkō (d. keene, trans) new york, ny: columbia university press. koegler, h.h. (1996). the power of dialogue. cambridge, ma: the mit press. nietzsche, f. (1968). the will to power. (w. kaufman & r. j. hollingdale, trans) london, uk: wiedenfeld & nicolson. williams, r. (2014). the edge of words. london, uk: bloomsbury. note this paper was first presented at the hermeneutics of practice workshop at the university of dundee, may 2015, and subsequently at the north american society for philosophical hermeneutics annual conference, philadelphia, september 19, 2015. microsoft word paul editorial corrected proof.docx corresponding author: jim paul, phd email: paul@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics april 7, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 invited guest editorial just saying: for h/heaven’s sake… here’s hoping -- “all hell could break loose!” jim paul bodies are not only biological phenomena but also complex social creations onto which meanings have been variously composed and imposed according to time and space. (karkazis, 2008) preface if you have been reading, to date, in the journal of applied hermeneutics, dr. john williamson’s phd thesis-come-novel serialized, then you have read, more or less, four texts: • guest editorial: preface to “a strange and earnest client” part one of the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery by w. john williamson [january 11, 2016]; • the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery. part one: a strange and earnest client [january 11, 2016]; • invited guest editorial. lives worthy of life: the everyday resistance of disabled people by nick hodge [february 22, 2016], and • the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery. part two: cells of categorical confinement [february 22, 2016]. my name is jim paul. i am the invited guest editorial provider for the third installment of john’s work titled part three: all hell could break loose. paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 2 editorial remarks part three is, in my opinion, methodological interpretive research magic, which carefully advances the investigation regarding the educational category of slow learners. the methodological magic is evident, in this section, in how max explores portrayals of slow learners in popular media, exposes john williamson’s deep implicated-ness with slow learners, opens up the archival history of slow learner as an educational label, and wrestles with the complex history of programming for slow learners in the province of alberta. as you will read, max is getting closer to revealing what is really at stake in the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner. so, here and now, i seek to make a case, in this editorial, that the content explored in part three is necessarily required regarding the case at hand, but the magic in this section is how the writing manifests as max’s internal and external voice didactically positions and re-positions a reader into and out of the content both intellectually and emotively. that invitation is achieved, i believe, in this section, because of how max exists, phenomenologically and hermeneutically, often at the same time, as teacher and learner. let me explain and let me begin where part three concludes as a clue that leads this editorial forward. (max) i pulled into the passenger drop off and thanked summit for his candor as he thanked me for the ride. before he got out of the car, summit gave me the names of a few curriculum leaders currently working with the k & e series of classes and told me where i could find them. then he offered a theory about how to find justice for slow learners that didn’t make much sense to me at the time. he told me to look to my own methods for an answer. i felt there was practical wisdom in so much of the rest of what he said; i hoped i might gather some more clues to shed some light on this last cryptic statement. (italics emphasis added, p. 55) “he told me to look to my own methods for an answer.” indeed. is it not attributed to socrates that… the unexamined life is not worth living. so, max… examined. max is a true hard-boiled mystery formula detective. true to intent and form, throughout a convoluted twist and turn, friend as foe, foe as friend, investigation all pales in comparison to his unrelenting quest for the discovery of and necessity to bring justice to the case at hand. as such, it is his very being, language, actions, and mere presence in the service of seeking justice for slow learners that seems to position him as a significant threat to all involved directly and indirectly in the case. as max digs deeper and wider into the case, in part three, the push-back against his investigation increasingly becomes more layered with twists and turns and, of course, max is routinely assaulted, captured, drugged, and beaten by a layered criminal element who seem to have vast political, economic and social powers. so, we, as readers, experience max as a quintessential hard-boiled detective who is deeply marginalized and often dark, vulgar and verging on being an illegitimate “professional” not unlike sleazy lawyers, or shady cops, or used car salesmen. however, it is also obvious that max lives as he chooses to. as well, embodied, again, in his life style is a rejection of the sanctioned and privileging modernity markers of standard decorum and normalized achievement. max is, paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 3 more or less, not a standard antihero as he moves beyond being merely an irritating grain of sand, and becomes a significant threat whereby the criminal rich, powerful, and beautiful attempt to draw max into their worlds and to use him for their own corrupt purposes. ironically, when max is invited in, he finds himself confirming that such worlds are riddled with what he knows already to exist categorical violence, layers of deceit and quagmires of corruption. still, max’s own storied marginality not only sustains him in such circumstances it continuously serves to feed his quest for contextual justice. while all the discoveries of villainy, duplicity, and corruption are necessary plot essentials, in part three, it is how the criminality element is threatened by max’s very presence that is directly linked to how max methodologically exists that also illustrates the life-blood of his hard-boiled being-ness. max, found wanting as a modern person, citizen, and as a regular detective, plays a complex and ambiguous adversarial role to hard-boiled villains at hand who are often disguised as seducers, or provocateurs, or even allies. what max reveals in the tangled layers of criminality evident in part three is that categorical evil has become essentially systemic within modernity’s operational and functional designs. it is max’s paradoxical mix of suspicion and respect, cynicism and honor, attraction and repulsion, brutality and sentimentality, and failure and success and his unrelenting need for justice served wrapped up in his own world of violence and treachery, that explicitly opens up the regimes of persuasive corruption and criminality evil endemic to modernity’s heavenly sought politically powerful, economically-divided, and hierarchical social orders. so, why can’t modernity, via its categorical guardians, deal with max if he is merely just another paper-tiger or glass elephant, antihero construct? simply, i believe, methodologically, as a socratic-like pedagogue, max opens, by drawing out, modernity’s dominating cartesian metaphysics of presence. modernity, and its institutional agencies and grand design discourses, seeks to continuously encode and decode humans into accepting the given commandment categories of rational-defined splits between mind and body, individual and collective, and between exposition-argumentation and narrative-description. remember, max has chosen to cast himself out of modernity’s heaven on earth, and in doing so, he seems to know that h/heaven and h/hell is a false dichotomy. max, crudely and rudely, like a displaced hell-boy in heaven, via his embodied and mindful pedagogic use of the ancient greek socratic method returns modernity’s scribal society (purves, 1990) and its split-inducing mechanisms writing and reading literacy and numeracy to their original, negotiable difficulties as categories of this-that, here-there, now-then, and i-you also as false dichotomies. again, how so? max is a socratic-embodied pedagogue even if he doesn’t know it; he is it… a solitary unified symbiotic learning-teaching presence. plato was teaching, then, precisely at the moment when the new technology of reading and writing was shedding its specialized ‘craft’ status and finally spreading, by means of the greek curriculum, into the culture at large. the significance of this conjunction has not been well recognized by western philosophers, all whom stand – to a greater or lesser extent within plato’s lineage. plato, or rather the association between the literate and his mostly non-literate teacher socrates (469?-399 b.c.e.), may be recognized as the hinge upon which the sensuous, mimetic, profoundly embodied style of consciousness proper to orality gave way to the more detached, abstract mode of thinking engendered by alphabetic literacy. indeed, it was plato who carefully developed and brought to term paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 4 the collective thought-structures appropriate to the new technology. (abram, 1996, pp. 108-109) it is plato’s teacher, socrates, who seemed to have understood that a radically different language game would mean a radically different form of consciousness, meaning-making, and determiners for what counts as sanctioned or not ways of knowing, doing and being. the movement from orality reality and its primary sensory-representational ways of storied knowing, doing and being to a referential, abstract alphabetic-phonic sign system would mean for all things – human and otherwise – a new world order riddled with penultimate categorization. in an old technology orality-based society, a speaker’s word-actions are birthed, developed and legitimated throughout oral exchanges within a speaker’s membership in a collective whereby ways of knowing, doing and being are learned. the teaching speaker and the listening learner as one is a necessarily present embodiment of the collective’s cultural practices, moralities and social customs. the socializing power of an orality-based collective lives in its method of inclusive induction for members which requires all present be spoken into the collective’s past, present and future. presence becomes the cultural methodological learning-teaching requirement. presence is the essential element of a reality metaphysics in orality-driven cultures whereby narrative as words, actions and images are presented as emotive storied expressions to all gathered. the wordimage-action performances are witnessed in the emotive moment and it is in this being situationally presence whereby understanding and meaning making regarding self, other and world via story-telling and story-receiving lives. embodied in the telling and listening relationship is a reciprocal responsibility to ensure connectivity between experiential understandings of pastpresent-future and self-other-world. in the specific arrangements of story-sounds, story-images, and story-performances, cultural virtues and vices are passed on as living entities. and herein lives a fundamental aspect of an orality-based society. the qualities of what it means to be right and wrong, good and bad, truthful and deceptive, or just and unjust and so on are intertwined with meaning derived, over time, as embodied in the specific storied-narrative contexts. all virtues and all evils and so on were situationally locatable in the stories told over and over from century to century as lessons to be learned and retaught. always, however, what counts as virtue or evil is explicitly defined experientially by the workings of the storied representational contexts. situations, meanings-derived, and the oral representations of those situations were one and the same. as such, in an orality-based culture, all vices and virtues are justifiably experienced as a storied-event alive with intent, meaning, understanding and impact. that is why, in the presence of a story, one becomes responsible to re-tell the story because the pedagogy of transferability demands it. socrates was an inherited storied-being. he was an orality-based human being. he was pedagogically presently to his student, plato, when the alphabet-writing-reading literacy technologies were emerging. however, as plato acquired these new technologies, he was also his teacher’s student. as socrates projected the alphabet literacies manifest as writing-reading would fix, concretize and render, ironically, orality and narrative as untrustworthy and an old technology. the new literacies required disciplined training in encoding and decoding and the future was to be one dominated by visible/see-able codes, policies, laws, commandments, rules and scripts. socrates challenged plato to understand the new literacies required a split between subject and object, and of writer-speaker from reader-listener and literally such gaps would lead to recognizable and measurable differences. as well, within the inherited recombinant and abstract paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 5 referential nature of the new literacies, socrates foresaw the directionality of the new literacy paradigm as preparing the ancient greeks to adopt the concept of “-ness.” that is, if the alphabet is referentially abstract, then reasonability indicates all things were conceptually referentially absent but gap oppositional definable as well. if “-ness,” like whiteness, chair-ness, or faithfulness, was a referential category, then it must have an ultimate, ideal and unchanging reality essence. everything and anything could have multiple shape-shifting forms, but only one true essence for example, water (h2o) may deceptively be a liquid or solid or gas. such a concept of “-ness” leads on quickly to ordering and cementing those now so obvious life-world dichotomies and polarities previously contextually and complexly storied but now seemingly just waiting to be named, grouped and declared categorically. philosophical, pragmatic, and natural sciences evolved to accomplish such a task to seek out, via hypothesizing, experimenting, or autopsies the discovering of the essential essence of everything on, under, or over this planet and its characteristic shape-shifter attributes and properties. it became the norm to imagine, dream, theorize, invent and meditate the existence of a perfect essence perfection unaffected by uncontrollable circumstances, or mutating contexts, or born-to-die bodies. descartes studied the ancient greeks and read plato and aristotle. he read about how alphabetic literacy emerged and the civilizing power it held, and the possibility of human beings progressing developmentally towards godly-heavenly perfection on earth or beyond. being cognitively reasonable, descartes dismissed plato’s teacher’s (socrates) thought and methods because they were, well, unusable in that they were storied and thus deemed illogical, emotional, and irrational. so, descartes confirms his head-selected, mind-verified and falsified ancient greek inherences and fixes western progress on one pathway forward, a cartesian modern world. a world whereby selected polarities and dichotomies become privileged and writing-reading literacies and numeracy must continue to be the definitive citizen-personhood sorting machine technologies regarding what constitutes inclusivity or exclusivity as a tribal member of western civilization. today, contemporary citizens and persons are awash in the normalcy of cartesian precise category developmental measurements. what counts as normal, verifiable, and justifiable progress and development for everything and everyone is to be sorted by gradations according to established and verifiable standards of necessary judgmental exactness within fixed and normalized categories. the need for constant reductive literacy/numeracy testing and the categorical judging of everything and everyone into elevated winners and grounded losers actually justifies itself as a legitimate process just look at the amazing progress of the west. this is systemic modernity, and it is protected by its guardians who are robotic discourse vampires selectively trained to suck the living blood out of every and each failed category thus ensuring each opposition pales in comparison to the desirable heavenly categories glorified by such unjust comparison. the institution of schooling becomes the primary literacies learning sorting machine. within the institution, mimicking modernity, the preferred and privileged discourses are numbers and exposition or argument word-thought-action arrangements. the motto for schooling becomes: one, two, three… testing, testing, testing. learners are measured and categorized according to their effective and efficient dexterity with literacy and numeracy. as well, today schooling’s mandate has a new partner digital and social media technologies manifest as popular culture is every bit or more effective as a trainer of the young within modernity’s design for perfection. media plays directly, experientially, to the minded-eye, but the message is the same regarding paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 6 how one must be if he or she is to achieve posthuman (hayles, 1999) perfection. as godly posthumans, via forever advancing communication and social technologies, we can achieve the dream of elevating ourselves, virtually and pragmatically, from that dead-weight tangible sensory ‘thing’, a decaying body, holding us down in everyway imaginable. with modern literacies technologies as elevated, abstract and ideal languages, human beings can take a rightful place as the ultimate abstract prime signifier a single solitary unified god-ness perfection incarnate. yes… max! max is basically, in my opinion, a throw-back to a narrative-based socratic human creature incarnate. he is self-authored as his own counterfactual and as such a storied o/other represented as a modern loser wrapped up in a disguising, imperfect body. yet, as a storied interruption max presents an unsettling and threatening presence to modernity and its guardians. he does not speak as they do he doesn’t use exposition or argument. i believe, he embodies the simple socratic method that evokes in all around him, more or less, to a greater or lesser degree, interpretive angst. perhaps, such a vibration is all that is need to move the categories of this-ness and that-ness. in part three, max consistently and continuously seeks out persons to engage. he asks all speakers to repeat and re-tell what they said. in doing so, he gets them to reflexively listen to what they were mouthing explanations, reasons, rules, justifications, and so on. in doing so, he socratic-like induces speakers to wonder or question, if only for a moment, about their own lack of being present in modernity’s objectifying knowing, doing and being design. once voice has been located and then dislocated via questions that come to rest in how justification for this or that might be understood in a moment, even modernity’s guardians’ catch a glimpse of how they have become essentially, as paulo freire once commented, narration sick. via max’s method, those he engages with friend and foe are re-located not in the abstract, but in a specific bawdy, emotive, complexly experiential context of a storied moment. in that moment justice, courage, strength and ethics slip out of their fixed scribal categories and are returned to their original contexts-specific difficulties. that is, in the evocative moment, one feels compelled to re-understand the categories that have been so taken for reasonable granted-ness. right and wrong, good and evil, or just and unjust are no longer universal abstract constructs, but contextually-specific living entities requiring personal re-authoring. max is a storied pedagogic moment. he is a threat to all those who must live, ironically, those stories advancing the story that humans are not essentially storied persons and citizens. postface in part three, max works his way through portrayals of slow learners in popular media culture that reveal more about modernity than slow learners, he attends to williamson’s deep, selfdeprecating, humbling, and storied implicated-ness with slow learners, and max investigates the archival ‘factual’ history of slow learner as an educational label, and concludes by attending to the “official” history of programming for slow learners in the province of alberta. however, in every situation where max takes up his case to examine slow learners, in part three, he subsequently tracks down or attracts a modernity guardian of the categorical status quo establishment or even resisters to that agenda. using a hermeneutic phenomenology-sympathetic socratic method, max calls upon every guardian and resister to lay bear their storied-ness or not, implicated-ness or not, in the case of slow learners. the beauty here is max uses the essential reflexive questioning method very well, because he doesn’t really know he is using it, but rather he is it. max is a walking and talking question mark, period. his mere presence demands a response! paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 7 when face-to-face with max those with criminal intent or those experiencing such intent, having reflexively, if only for a moment (because that is all it takes is a pedagogic moment) understand that they have authorial rights and responsibilities, and not to use them is to live a life unexamined. in this process, in this pedagogic context, all humans being, more or less, recognize, archetypically, we are all storied entities. max raises the interpretive possibility, again, if only as an in and out breath’s moment, of shaking the decontextualizing, objectifying fixedness of modernity’s meta-desires. max is the counterfactual who, in this case, truly and actually, and magically, reminds all presence that every grand narrative is nevertheless also a fabric of millions and millions micro-stories. slow learners are especially already storied persons. max’s storied presence brings into the reflexive light the real possibility that we all, categorically, could be otherwise, and we should be deeply shaken by the rigidity of modernity’s categories that prevent us from knowing that there by the grace of a magical outcome of nature and nurture, go i. the unexamined life is not worth living. how max is max pulls everyone friend or foe reflexively towards such an examination. seemingly, many of us are no longer able to or feel the necessity to do so; we are literate but deaf and dumb to what that really means to attend to self as other and other as self. here’s hoping, in part four, that max continues to be a methodological hell-boy cutting a swath of reflexive destruction through all those living in denial of s/self and s/self as o/other and that we are all symbiotic storied creatures and narrative beings and in and of itself that may be all we really are! “i sent my soul through the invisible, some letter of that after-life to spell: and by and by my soul return’d to me, and answer’d: ‘i myself am heav’n and hell’.” omar khayyam references abram, d. (1996). the spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world. new york, ny: vintage books. cawelti, j. (1976). adventure, mystery, and romance: formula stories as art and popular culture. chicago, il: university of chicago press. hayles, k. (1999). how we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and infromatics. chicago, il: university of chicago press. karkazis, k. (2008). fixing sex: intersex, medical authority, and lived experience. durham, nc: duke university press. kreeft, p. (2008). socratic logic: a long text using socratic method, platonic questions, and aristotelian principles (ed. 3.1). south bend, in: st. augustines press. purves, a. (1990). the scribal society: an essay on literacy and schooling in the information age. london, uk: longman group. pynchon, t. (1984). slow learner: early stories. boston, ma: little, brown & co. microsoft word williamson corrected proof final.docx corresponding author: w. john williamson, phd email: john.williamson@cssd.ab.ca journal of applied hermeneutics november 10, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 the hermeneutics of poetry slam: play, festival and symbol w. john williamson abstract in this paper, i discuss poetry slam events as hermeneutic encounters. gadamer’s analysis of play, festival, and symbol form the theoretical basis of the discussion. exemplary data include my research into aspects of the history and ritual of slam as well as my experiential data as a spectator, coach of a poetry slam team of adolescents who compete in a provincial tournament for young poets, and as a slam performer. i contend that, despite slam’s occasional “silliness,” occasional problems of quality and fair play, and the insistence of many academics that it is not a worthwhile celebration of literature, poetry slam has the potential to create meaningful connections between diverse communities and tarry over language as a hermeneutic event. i note that, in an era where text is generated with increasing rapidity while our abilities to appreciate language as an event or as a means of connecting with each other are undermined, poetry slams might be the kind of festival we need to seek relief from these trends. keywords hermeneutics, gadamer, poetry, poetry slam, play, festival, symbol no props, no costumes, no nudity, and no animal acts. (canadian individual poetry slam 2015) we have seen that play does not have its being in the player's consciousness or attitude, but on the contrary, play draws him into its dominion and fills him with its spirit. the player experiences the game as a reality that surpasses him. this is all the more the case where the game is itself “intended” as such a reality—for instance, the play which appears as presentation for an audience. (gadamer, 2004, p. 109) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 8 2 i would like to think hans-georg gadamer (2004) would have been intrigued by poetry slam. the activity combines all the dynamic aspects of “play” he discussed in his opus, truth and method, with the interpretive and enterprise of artistic communication. the philosopher would have appreciated how the activity of poetry slam has given artists worldwide, whose voices might not be heard without this particular form of expression, the opportunity to speak their unique truths, earning self –affirmation of being messengers of import while also expanding the empathy and awareness, the horizons of understanding (p. 537), of those who are listening. finally, as one who often wrote about the hermeneutic character of social occasions, gadamer (1986; 2004) would have appreciated how poetry slams take on the familiar novelty of festivals. i first learned of poetry slam around four years ago, when i viewed the documentary “louder than a bomb” about chicago’s annual high school poetry slam competition (siskel & jacobs, 2010). i found the film‘s depiction of the courageous teams of adolescent poets, speaking out about personal vulnerabilities and social injustices within the collective of an artistic community that was both supportive and formally competitive, remarkable. it was likely this spark that led me to deepen my relationship with poetry slam as an active participant, through co-coaching teams of high school students in the can you hear me now provincial poetry championship and competing myself in adult slam series hosted by two local poetry collectives, the ink spot collective and university of calgary spoken word society. these experiences have, in turn, led me to reflect on the hermeneutic character of poetry slamming. in this paper, i will, from the perspectives i have experienced as a spectator, coach, and participant, undertake a hermeneutic phenomenological analysis of poetry slam as a form of play, as an example of festival, and as a communal exchange of symbol. what is poetry slam? in 1984, marc smith, a chicago construction worker, came up with idea to enliven the poetry readings he was hosting at a local jazz club, the get me high lounge (burrows 2001). using terminology borrowed from bridge and baseball, and an olympic-style, zero to ten point scoring system (burrows, 2001), smith turned the readings into a competition in which poets were scored for their craft and performance ability by randomly selected audience members with the top poet of the evening earning a cash prize. though some poets balked at the imperative to “perform” rather than “read” their poetry (ya salaam 2001), poetry slam turned out to be a popular innovation in the spoken word poetry community, improving for many people the accessibility of an art form that they had come to view, perhaps due to scarring experiences studying it in public schooling (canadian individual poetry slam 2015), as stodgy and alienating. as burrows wrote, poetry slam “humanize[d] the poetry and [took] it out of its heretofore hallowed academic settings to become something that was owned by everyone -even the drunk and disenfranchised” (2001, para. 3). whether poetry slam has succeeded in “re-energiz[ing] the [larger] poetry scene,” (burrows 2001) or has simply grown into a popular genre of its own with little impact on other poetic arts, it has garnered a massive global following. myslam.net (2015), an international portal to support slamming worldwide, lists 40 separate countries that host poetry slams (2015). in many of these countries, including canada and the u.s., local competitions lead up to national and international williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 8 3 championships. you tube views and ted talks of acclaimed slam poets number from the hundreds of thousands to the millions, slam poetry has been lampooned in popular films such as 22 jump street (hill & tatum & lore & miller 2014), and incorporated into global events such as shayne koyzan’s 2010 performance of “we are more” at the opening ceremony of the vancouver winter olympic games. the rules of poetry slam are fairly simple. poets read or recite their work and are then judged on a numeric scale by previously (and randomly) selected members of the audience. poems must be original, though some limited sampling of other work for the sake of allusion is allowed. there is a three minute time limit to each poem, with a ten second grace period following, after which points are deducted (poetry slam inc. 2015). the prohibitions against props (this rule is serious, there really are deductions for using props), animal acts, and nudity (tongue in cheek) that i quoted at the beginning of this paper feature as well (canada individual poetry slam 2015). before the competition begins, the emcee will bring up a “sacrificial” poet a guest performer not entered in the competition who the judges will score in order to calibrate their judging (aptowicz 2008). the first round at a standard slam consists of performances by all the poets who registered to compete, with some slams eliminating the lower scoring poets in successive rounds and some slams not eliminating poets at all (aptowicz 2008). poetry slams can be individual or team competitions, and in the case of team competitions two or more poets can take the stage in a single round for group poems. at the end of a slam, the highest scoring poet, or team of poets, wins. though these rules and procedures are often quite thoroughly adhered to, the slam tradition has also long included an openly stated ambivalence to the competitive aspect of slamming with the emcees of events often reminding the audience that “the points are not the point; the point is poetry” during slam events (poetry slam inc. 2015). as an example of a poem performed at poetry slam, i humbly offer the only public performance of my own that i can tolerate looking at. please see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ujyluuuuda slam as play taylor mali, one of the most celebrated poets to emerge out of the slam movement, famously reversed the generous mantra about the point being the poetry to “the points are not the point; the point is to get more points than anyone else” (poetry slam inc. 2015). though this was undoubtedly a somewhat tongue in cheek statement, not meant to seriously undermine the artistic comradery of “the point is the poetry,” there is truth in this quip. in reinforcing the idea that a poetry slam is a competition and that the poets do their best to win, mali evoked an essential aspect of gadamer’s (2004) hermeneutic play. seriousness is not merely something that calls us away from play; rather, seriousness in playing is necessary to make the play wholly play. someone who doesn't take the game seriously is a spoilsport. (p. 103) i have felt and sensed in other audience members some disappointment in watching slam performers not take their turns on stage seriously enough. i once watched a performer exhaust the williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 8 4 audience’s patience with a rambling five minute poem (incurring a full 5.5 points worth of deductions) that might have had something to do with the cosmos. his trespass was not so much in performing a poem that was hard to follow, which happens with enough frequency to be fairly forgivable when complex poems are performed out loud, it was in his participating while refusing to “play” by performing such on obviously non-competitive poem. conversely, having experienced poetry slam as a spectator, coach, and competitor, i can attest to the thrill of the competitive conversation when the poets take it seriously. as a poet and as a coach i have endured the intense suspense, and sometimes a slight sinking feeling, of having to follow an especially well-written and well-performed poem. does one follow a poignant, tragic poem with one that is even sadder? or does one “change things up” with a funny poem? on the subject of this dilemma, my daughter emma1, who was one of the competitors on the team i coached, once crafted a poem that made fun of some of the more maudlin and/or posturing tendencies certain sub genres of slam poems, with lines such as maybe you got the stadium heated with a poem full of flaming hip-hop anger, presenting your poem and condemning the norm which is ironic, since you can’t even form a rap that doesn’t conform to every tired cliché out there… (ucs spoken word, 2015) despite this poem being well received at noncompetitive open mike readings, it was tough for her to know when she should perform it in competition as it there was a risk that following anyone who had performed even a somewhat clichéd poem with sincerity with her satiric poem might seem mean and be poorly received. when i, as one of her coaches, suggested she perform this poem during the final round of competition in the can you hear me now, she declined, choosing instead a more personal and self-effacing poem that was well received by the judges and audience. i imagine that the suspense in this final round of the can you hear me now slam was palpable for everyone in attendance. for heightened connoisseurship and excitement, the volunteer judges from the earlier rounds were replaced with prominent local authors and poets, and the theatre at lord beaverbrook high school was nearly at capacity. the level of competition was high as the teams of poets who had shone in earlier rounds of competition went head to head in the final. as a coach, i remember earnestly whispering to my fellow coaches between the performances about our team’s poem selections as well as which of our poets we should send up to follow the various competing poets from the other teams. i remember desperately hoping we had made the right choices as i watched our poets take the stage. 1 with the exceptions of my performance video and one quotation from the published work of an adult poet, in order to showcase some emerging young poets, i have selected all of the exemplary quotations of poetry from adolescent poets who competed at can you hear me now. the poems were all performed at public events and my quotations are taken from publicly available you tube videos of the performances of these poems at can you hear me now and other venues. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 8 5 as much as i can attest to the excitement of slam poetry as a coach and competitor, i find the thrill of experiencing the “to and fro” competitive conversation as a spectator is almost as intense. for me, and, i think for many audience members, there is an unavoidable sense of being caught up in the moment, similar to what gadamer (1986), who appreciated tennis as a player as well as a spectator (dostal 2002), observed about viewers of tennis. we only have to observe on television the spectators of a tennis match cricking their necks. no one can avoid playing along with the game. (p. 24) although a little more time elapses between the verbal “volleys” and “groundstrokes” in slam poetry, when the poems stand out in their truth and intensity, the performances in their dynamism, and when the competition is very close, the feeling of being caught up is the same. slam as festival drawing on the theories of mikhail bakhtin, freitas (2012) wrote a thesis explaining poetry slam as a form of carnival and carnival as a form of resistance. as freitas (2012) explained carnival provides a time and place where the existing social order becomes 'uncrowned' and inverted through the practices of the participants allowing laughter and critique to challenge the dominant discourses. carnival relies on the participation of everyone at the event to create an alternative social order so that people can relate to each other on an equal basis during the carnival time. (p. 3) a detailed response to freitas’s claims is beyond the scope of this paper, but this passage does foreshadow aspects of my experiences with slam poetry as they might be understood from the vantage of gadamerian hermeneutics. while i agree with freitas that both the creation of a unique social order and the opportunity for free critique, or the speaking of truth to power are both essential aspects of the democratic potential of poetry slam, i will focus larger claim that poetry slam is a festive event. for gadamer (1986), the essence of the celebration of festival went beyond the temporary suspension of social roles, though it seems reasonable to suggest that he would have approved of the idea that this was an aspect in the larger essence. in his thinking, festival involved the suspension of temporality itself. though the scheduling of festivals is obviously dependent on the mundane processes by which we calculate time, the ritual of festival paradoxically depends on the rituals of “arresting” time, “allowing it to tarry,” and even “bringing it to a standstill” (p. 42). though, ironically, each poem in a poetry slam competition is meticulously timed, the larger enterprise still involves the setting aside on the part of the attendees, of an evening, or an entire weekend, to marvel at the power of poetic truth and experience themselves as a part of a common humanity, a whole unit of poetry. tradition plays a key role in this. this is most obviously reinforced by how every poetry slam is ostensibly governed by similar processes and rules. but beyond this, there are various traditions of audience participation in slam including the snapping of fingers as a means of expressing approval for an especially poignant line, instead of doing so through applause and potentially williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 8 6 drowning out the line to follow. throughout a slam event, the emcees will fire up the audience with the repeated call and respond of “i say poetry, you say rocks!” (felton 2015). antiauthoritarian, even regarding the authority that enables the event, the emcee at a poetry slam tells the judges not to be swayed by the audience and then in the next breath tells the audience that it is their job to sway the judges with their applause. in perhaps the strangest tradition, reflective of the ambivalence of “the points are not the point,” poets who exceed the time limit are penalized but also formally consoled, and the timekeeper is chastised, when after every time violation the emcee leads the audience in a chant of derision against the timekeeper, “you rat bastard bitch, you’re ruining everything for everyone... but it was well worth it!” (calgary spoken word society 2015). if these traditions seem a little silly, it bears mentioning that while the particular slam ritual only goes back three decades or so, the oral poetry/storytelling tradition and the call and response traditions that often accompany it wind back into antiquity (mello 2001). each set of traditions, even in this relatively new art form, builds a familiarity and an expectation around the event. in poetry slam, this expectation is that the event will bring forth something true, poignant, and unique. highlighting the tension between the unique and familiar that festival involves, gadamer (1986) used the example of christmas. it is an annual celebration of an event that happened two thousand years ago, and has developed its own unique rituals, and yet every christmas celebration is different than the last. symbol from a found poem in which calgary poet and poetry slammer tyler b. perry (2010) noticed a sign cautioning against disturbing nesting heron chicks and replaced “heron chicks” with students: students often fall accidentally or are pushed by their classmates. this is a normal occurrence. you may find young students on the ground that are not injured. this is normal. please do not disturb them. they are learning to fly. the currency of poetry is the symbol, and gadamer (1986) hauntingly, and with great relevance to this discussion, reminded us of the origin of concept of symbol. in the ancient world, a symbol was one piece of a deliberately broken object. it would be given to a guest by his or her host with the host keeping the other matching piece. it represented the hope that the two would meet again, and if they did meet that “the two pieces could be fitted together again to form a whole in an act of recognition” (p. 31). in this sense, the symbol acted as “a sort of pass used in the ancient world: something in and through which we recognize something already known to us” (p. 31). williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 8 7 when the poems at slams work, they work by this same process. as an audience member i have found myself listening to a poem with growing interest and recognition and then, though the exact moment can be hard to pin down, it has suddenly felt as if two pieces have been joined as the distance between me and the poem collapses. i have found the hairs on my body all standing on end, or my eyes welling up with tears, or uncontrollable laughter possessing me, or a lump of anger at some injustice the poet is describing make itself at home in my chest. it is often a particularly evocative use of figurative language, the use of symbolism, in a poem that gets to me, but even when a poet is being literal, frank, and very honest, the words have the same effect as symbol, the creation of a complete connection. i might not feel any more fractured than usual before an evening of poetry slam, but these senses of connection and completion are nevertheless the dominant things i experience when the poems are especially poignant. fragmentation the manner in which slam can build connections between poets and between poets and their audiences is all the more remarkable because there is no dominant age group, nationality, or gender to the people who attend poetry slams and no anthem to be written to directly address their shared history. indeed, the poets who are drawn to poetry slam, the style of poems they choose to perform, and the subjects they choose to write about have been described as very diverse (sunsetskyfire, 2014). aptowicz, in an interview with erlbaum, (2009) was emphatic about this, having noted “ranting hipsters, freestyle rappers, bohemian drifters, proto-comedians, mystical shamans and gothy punks have all had their time at the top of the slam food chain” (para. 5). related to gadamer’s earlier thoughts on symbol, a unifying feature of poetry slam, and its ability to connect with diverse audiences, is the openly stated vulnerability of the poets. drawing on the wisdom of aristophanes, as spoken in plato’s symposium, in a further analysis of symbol, gadamer (1986) has reminded us of the claim that (o)riginally all human beings were spherical creatures. but later on, on account of their misbehavior, the gods cut them in two. thereafter, each of the halves, which originally belonged to one complete living being, seeks to be made whole once again. thus every individual is a fragment. (pp. 31-32) though in plato’s symposium this myth is told in the context of a conversion specifically about the nature of love, it speaks more broadly to our existential character as beings who endure a sense of constant sense of fragmentation which we are always trying to resolve by connecting to others. in poetry slam the sharing of the poets’ vulnerabilities, read metaphorically here as their brokenness, the isolation one feels at the hands of fortune, or is made to feel because of injustice, provides the means by which the poet, and the listeners, who endure their own fragmentations, might feel whole again. i have seen this phenomenon at play, particularly, in can you hear me now where the adolescent poets offer up the very vulnerabilities that have often been the basis of their feeling fragmented and even marginalized and in doing so, experience empathy, welcome, and inclusion from their fellow poets and the members of the audience. some notable performances of this nature included michaela newman’s “my therapists keep asking about you,” about the suicide of the speaker of the poem’s stepfather and her trauma at the event and the complicated williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 8 8 ways she misses him (canyouhearmenow 2014) and “small” by kristiana sinding in which the diminutive speaker recalls how, after a frustrating childhood of being the “runt of the litter” she was, as an adolescent, told that she should be happy to be so small because small girls are desirable and that i should be glad to be so petite because i would be wanted because of the inferiority of lesser size because men will find me easier to pin, easier to grab, easier to dominate (2015) in defiance of this patriarchally insulting compliment the speaker of “small” then goes on to note, in mock apology, “sorry buddy but i’m not that into men.” in bethel afework’s (2015) “white girl,” the speaker lashes out at the hypocrisy of her “keeping it real” peers who mock her for not being “black” enough. “call me a white girl one more time, i dare you. call me an oreo one more time,” she challenges (canyouhearmenow 2015). in all three of these popular poems from the competition the brave recounting of experiences in which fate and/or prejudice made the poets feel particularly, even overwhelmingly fragmented was the basis of the shared feeling of emotional completion between the poets and the audience. having noted this, i should point out that while some of the best received slam poems are about very damaging experiences that the poets endured, the poems do need not be this intense to draw an empathetic reaction. well-crafted poems about smaller sufferings are well received too. popular poems at can you hear me now also included brianna lynn’s eponymous poem in which the speaker worries that her life is too boring to write a good slam poem about (canyouhearmenow 2014) and my daughter emma’s “adorable,” in which the speaker insists that her frilly style of dress and appreciation of artistic make up styles is a sign of confidence and not its lack (ucs spokenword 2015). i can attest to this feeling of emotional completion as a poet as well as a spectator. on the adult circuit my three most personal poems, about my frustrations with the special education labelling system in alberta and my own time in school dealing with a perceptual/motor skills disability, my introversion, and my fears of coming down with alzheimer’s as many of my relatives have, while being the most difficult to share have also been the ones that were best received by the audience. moreover, i felt the greatest sense of communion with the audience and my fellow poets, through their supportive listening, enthusiastic applause, and through the conversations many took the time to have with me after they heard the poems. when slam doesn’t play well i do not mean to overly romanticize poetry slam in this discussion. while poetry slam can, as i have claimed, reveal (and revel in) an artistic communion, this does not mean that it always does. there are many things that can thwart its hermeneutic transactions. without some measure of poetic craft, the recounting of a performer’s painful experiences can come off more as a primal scream, perhaps therapeutic for the speaker but shrill and alienating for the audience. as one of my fellow slammers remarked to me, some audiences can be too easily won over, snapping their fingers in approval of familiar clichés like “you have to live every moment like it’s your last” williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 8 9 instead of original and honest writing. judges can fall to this tendency too, and in a similar vein can favor particularly dynamic performers instead of attending equally to the craft of the poems. as mali remarked in jest, sometimes the points do become the point for some of the performers in an excessive way and, when the competitive aspect is highlighted disputes ensue more frequently about the fairness of the competition, the quality of the judging, the quality of this or that poet, and the competence of the organizers. while these sorts of complaints unflatteringly emphasize the competitive aspect of poetry slam, they can also be rightful criticisms of the fairness of the events. the tendency towards “score creep” where regardless of the quality of the poetry the scores get higher and higher over the course of the evening, to the disadvantage of earlier poets is such a common problem that it has its own name and is even mentioned as part of poetry slam vocabulary in several books on poetry slam (aptowicz 2008; somers-willet 2009). despite the democratic corrective aptowicz (2008) mentioned, that any time a certain style of slam poetry seems to be at the “top of the food chain,” another style lays in waiting to overtake it, particular styles can become wearisome in the moment. another poet friend of mine has described his recent aversion to performances in the currently favored style involving the rapid delivery of cleverly connected words, with cadence that gives the suggestion that they are stream of consciousness occurrences, accompanied by aggressive gesturing. despite his admission that many of the poets who have this style are very talented, he has told me the style has become a barrier to his connection with their work. while it would be overreaching to claim these as beneficial aspects of poetry slam, in the hermeneutic sense imperfections are part of what gives an event its character. moules (2002) has reminded us that hermes, the messenger god hermeneutics is named after, does not always play nicely. he is a “trickster [with] with the character of complication, multiplicity, lies, jokes, irreverence, indirection, and disdain for rules,” (p. 3). similarly, gadamer (2004) has explained that a game consists of much more than the individual agency of its players, “it is the game itself that plays,” (p. 484). thus, in a larger sense, the sorts of problems that emerge in poetry slam can be seen as slam itself playing somewhat capriciously with the same participants it sometimes rewards with truth, communion, and conviviality. conclusion it seems to me that gadamer (2004) would have been sympathetic to the contention that for poetry to fully reach its potential to be meaningful that it has to be performed. describing dramatic performance, he wrote we have shown above that this kind of reproduction is not a second creation re-creating the first; rather, it makes the work of art appear as itself for the first time. (p. 400) i have experienced this on a practical level. when i was preparing to perform at my first slams, i chose some poems that i had written long before i had ever heard of these events. as i started to rehearse them, with the advice of a more experienced (and more skilled) poet, i discovered that they were too wordy as i’d originally written them. it was not possible to perform impactful readings of these poems without editing for concision, and i found the best way to edit was to practice performing the poems to test the effectiveness of any changes i was considering. i changed them further after public performances, using the “conversations” between my perforwilliamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 8 10 mances and the audience reactions and apparent understandings to enhance my meaning. my poems were not fully themselves until i had crafted them through performance. there are many, particularly in the academic community, who do not share the appreciation that i, and poetry slam’s many participants and spectators have for the activity (somers-willet 2009). harold bloom (in somers-willet 2009) famously dismissed the entire genre of poetry slam with his complaint that i can’t bear these accounts i read in the times and elsewhere of these poetry slams, in which various young men and women in various late-spots are declaiming rant and nonsense at each other. the whole thing is judged by an applause meter which is actually not there, but might as well be. this isn’t even silly; it is the death of art. (p. 21) i feel that bloom, and other scholars with similar opinions have misunderstood poetry slam’s potential. we live in an era where many feel that the pace and volume of text itself has become a threat. scholars worry that the distracting onslaught of words we subject ourselves to on social media and in our professional lives is “bad for our brains” (levitin 2015), and is eroding our ability to empathize (williams 2015). poetry slam provides opportunity to re-engage with, concentrate deeply on, and tarry over language as an event. in its festive aspect and in its fostering of human connection, poetry slam has reminded us that poetry is “play” and, moreover that it is the kind of “play” many of us need to feel more connected. as “play” tends to, it at times looks silly. but it is also deadly serious. acknowledgement i would like to acknowledge my slam comrades richard wagner, tyler b. perry, paul finkleman, and siobhan feeney, the members of the st. anne academic centre slam team of 2015, and all past and present coaches, volunteers and competitors in can you hear me now. references afework, b. (may 2, 1015). “white girl” spoken word. [video file]. retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylae7am99fk. algarín, m., & holman, b. (1994). aloud: voices from the nuyorican poets café. new york: ny. henry holt & co. aptowicz, c.o. (2008). words in your face: a guided tour through twenty years of the new york city poetry slam. new york: ny, soft skull press. burrows, a. (2001). slam poetry: a brief history from chicago to seattle. history link.org.retrieved from http://www.historylink.org/ canadian individual poetry slam. (2015). c.i.p.s. faq for poets. in versus festival, vf (2015). retrieved from http://versesfestival.ca/about-verses/c-i-p-s-faq/. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 8 11 calgary spoken word society (2015). faq. retrieved from http://www.calgaryspokenwordfestival.com/ slam_faq.php. canyouhearmenow calgary (june 23, 2014). cyhmn brianna lynn “brianna lynn”. [video file]. retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxzewetn4ge. canyouhearmenow calgary (dec. 4, 2014). michaela neuman “my therapists keep asking about you.” [video file] retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtaachonv_k. dostal, r.h. (2002). gadamer: the man and his work. in r.g. dostal the cambridge companion to gadamer. new york: ny, cambridge university press. erlbaum, j. (2008). the life story of the death of art. the best american poetry. retrieved from http://blog.bestamericanpoetry.com/the_best_american_poetry/2008/04/the-life-histor.html felton, r. (2015). students explode onto poetry slam scene. austin weekly news. retrieved from http://www.austinweeklynews.com/news/articles/3-16-2005/students-explode-onto-poetryslam-scene/. freitas, i.r. (2012). questioning the carnivalesque: poetry slams, performance, and contemporary forms of resistance. (unpublished master’s thesis). colorado university, fort collins, colorado. gadamer, h-g. (1986). the relevance of the beautiful. n. walker (trans.) in r. bernasconi (ed.) the relevance of the beautiful and other essays. (pp. 1 – 57.) cambridge: uk, cambridge university press. gadamer, h-g. (2004). truth and method. (j. weinheimer & d.g. marshall trans.) london, uk: continuum. hill, j. & tatum c. (producers), & lord, p. & milller, c. (directors). 22 jump street. united states: columbia pictures. jacobs, g. & siskel, j. (producers and directors), (2010) louder than a bomb. [motion picture]. united states. siskel / jacobs productions. index.cfm?displaypage=output.cfm&file_id=3448. koyczan, s. (2010). we are more. the toronto quarterly literary and arts journal. retrieved from http://thetorontoquarterly.blogspot.ca/2010/02/shane-koyczan-we-are-more-full -text.html. levitin, d.j. (2015). why the modern world is bad for your brain. the guardian. retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jan/18/modern-world-bad-for-brain-daniel-j-levitinorganized-mind-information-overload. mello, r. (2001). the power of storytelling: how oral narrative influences children's relationships in classrooms. international journal of education & the arts. 2(1). retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v2n1/. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 8 12 moules, n. j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes – an ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods 1 (3), article 1. retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/. perry, t.b. (2010). lessons in falling. in t.b. perry (ed.). lessons in falling. calgary, ab, canada: bhouse publications. sinding, k. (may 6, 2015). “small” cyhmn? 2015 calgary poetry slam. [video file]. retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdwjmi44_q8. somers-willett, s. b. a. (2009). the cultural politics of slam poetry: race, identity, and the performance of popular verse in america. ann arbor, mi: university of michigan press. retrieved october 26, 2015, from project muse database sunsetskyfire (2014). slam poetry: a celebration in diversity. the guardian. retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/childrens-books-site/2014/aug/22/slam-poetry-identity-amnestyteen-takeover-2014. ucspokenword (march 10, 2015). ucsw march slam john {spoken word}. [video file]. retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ujyluuuuda. ucspokenword (apr 19, 2015). ucsw april slam em dubs // round two { spoken word }. [video file]. retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwhpm2nqgn0. ucspokenword (april 20, 2015). ucsw april slam em dubs // round 3 { spoken word }. [video file]. ya salaam, kalamu (2001). in defense of slam! nation. black issue book review. march 1, 2001. retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2oiutqpr5i&feature=youtu.be&a. williams, a. (2015). do today’s tech-obsessed teens have less empathy? teenology news by teensafe. retrieved from http://www.teensafe.com/blog/todays-tech-obsessed-teens-lessempathy/. microsoft word newberryfinal.docx corresponding author: andrea m. newberry, faculty of social work, university of calgary email: amnewber@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics december 20, 2012 the author(s) 2012 social work and hermeneutic phenomenology andrea m. newberry abstract in this article, i discuss the connections between social work practice and interpretive approaches to knowledge building, introduce and situate hermeneutic phenomenology for novice social work researchers, and explore the fit between hermeneutic phenomenology and social work. in this paper, i also present a historical, methodological, and philosophical overview of the roots of hermeneutic/interpretive phenomenology from augustine to sartre. i advocate for the congruence between an hermeneutic approach and social work research due to its focus on inquiry as application, emphasis on the situated nature of human experiences, concept of attention to the unspoken or undisclosed, idea of the hermeneutic circle as a link between individual experiences and larger structures, fusion of horizons, and inclusion of the practitioner identity in research activities. keywords hermeneutics, interpretation, phenomenology, social work social work is interpretive and so emerges its affinity to hermeneutics and interpretive approaches to knowledge building such as hermeneutic phenomenology. in this article, i discuss the connections between social work practice and interpretive approaches to knowledge building, introduce and situate hermeneutic phenomenology for novice social work researchers, and explore the fit between hermeneutic phenomenology and social work. social work and interpretive approaches to knowledge interpretive inquiry is highly consistent with social work due to its inclusion of concepts of (situated) agency, closeness to subjects (with subjects understood as human actors), and a critical inter-subjectivity that seeks to disrupt oppressive social discourses through a hermeneutic understanding that connects newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 2 private troubles to public issues. with an ontological orientation that embraces truths over truth, and an epistemological approach emphasizing understanding and description over prediction and control (laverty, 2003), interpretive approaches allow social workers to appreciate human experiences in all their situated richness, without being compelled to make universal claims about the generalizability of findings. it is the relational, reflexive, artistic aspects of interpretative research that allow the depth and nuances of human experiences and social work interventions to really shine. human beings are subjects rather than objects and this existence of human agency means that there can be no absolute laws of human experience and behavior, as may be sought of phenomena in the natural sciences. while powerful external forces may exert themselves upon human subjects, the existential recourse to choice is ever-present, and subjects can and will respond to their environments in new and creative ways. heidegger conceptualized this poststructural understanding of choice as situated freedom, whereby human beings exercise free will in the context of their political, social, and cultural realities (lopez & willis, 2002). while recognizing factors that may influence human behavior, the social sciences must not follow the natural sciences in the pursuit of truth, generalizable to all times, places, and peoples. so critical is the belief in agency that, without it, the only role for social work would be at the macro level. social work is itself a constructed (and contested) activity (payne, 2005), in which practitioners move back and forth between the macro and the micro. despite its focus on structural issues (mullaly, 1997), social work is at the same time deeply concerned with the most intimate of human experiences. each encounter with a client (whether the client is an individual, a family, a community, or a classroom) is a new experience. in the context of working with individuals, in particular, failure to experience this newness with each new encounter alienates the social worker from the client, to whom the experience is profoundly personal. at the same time, an experienced social worker draws from the experiences of others like the client to break down walls of shame, loneliness, and hopelessness, and in doing so, situates the client’s own story in an everexpanding web of human concerns. social workers attend to each individual’s experiences, in order to honor the newness of the narrative. after understanding the clients’ narratives on their own terms (the idiographic), the social worker can reflect upon and share with the client knowledge that may be useful to the client’s own healing, and in particular that which connects private troubles to public issues, thereby reducing feelings of self-blame and isolation. the social worker is changed by each such encounter, entering the hermeneutic circle, and bringing new pre-understandings to each situation. in social work research, the social work researcher’s own prejudices (professional, experiential, and scholarly) facilitate understanding of how to apply an interpretation; in-depth knowledge of the social work field and social work education allow for suggestion of more specific and meaningful applications. in the following section, i introduce hermeneutic phenomenology in its historical, methodological, and philosophical context. this description is intended for novice social work researchers considering interpretive approaches for their work. newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 3 hermeneutic phenomenology in context phenomenology phenomenology, a philosophical approach to studying human experience, is oriented toward understanding the essence of the lived experience of a phenomenon (creswell, 2007; smith, flowers, & larkin, 2009; van manen, 1990). phenomenology has its roots in the greek words phaenesthai and logos (gearing, 2004; moustakas, 1994). phaenesthai means “to flare up, to show itself, to appear” (moustakas, 1994, p. 26); logos is reason. thus, the phenomenon is what appears in consciousness (gearing, 2004; moran, 2000; moustakas, 1994; van manen, 1990), and phenomenology is the reasoned study of what appears (gearing, 2004). hermeneutic and transcendental phenomenology. hermeneutic phenomenology is epistemologically and methodologically distinct from transcendental phenomenology, a theme i will return to later in this paper. to categorize the two traditions at a very superficial level, hermeneutic phenomenology is used to interpret the meaning of lived experiences and communicate the interpretation textually or symbolically, while transcendental phenomenology is based on discovering the objective universal essences of lived experiences and communicating them through pure description (beyer, 2011, creswell, 2007; van manen, 1990). hermeneutic phenomenology’s forefathers: a brief history from augustine to sartre hermeneutics is the tradition, theory, philosophy, and practice of interpretation (moules, 2002; smith et al., 2009). hermeneutic phenomenology, then, has its roots in both hermeneutics and phenomenology. therefore, to articulate hermeneutic phenomenology’s historical, philosophical, and methodological underpinnings, it is necessary to present the contributions of both hermeneutic and phenomenological thinkers. the hermeneutic and phenomenological projects have long and complex histories, making it difficult to identify their starting points. the word phenomenology first appeared in philosophical writing in the eighteenth century (moustakas, 1994, p. 26), and hermeneutics was introduced in theology in the seventeenth century (moules, 2002). given the scope of this paper and the need to balance breadth with depth, i have elected to start with augustine and end with sartre in the twentieth century. the inclusion of these founding influences relies on moules’s (2002) presentation of the “ancestral” roots of hermeneutic inquiry; my decision to include sartre is informed by smith et al. (2009). aurelius augustine, 354-430. the fourth/fifth-century christian bishop, theologian, and philosopher aurelius augustine had a profound effect on both heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology and gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics (grondin, 1991/1994). his work formed the theoretical basis for conceptions of the limits of language to express the inner world, the forgetfulness of language, and the relationship between language and tradition (grondin, 1991/1994; moules, 2002). the limits of language. according to grondin’s (1991/1994) analysis of augustine, the inner world, or “language of the heart” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 35) can never be fully expressed through language; “something more still to be said to in order to comprehend the matter fully” always remains (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 37). grondin explained augustine’s assertion that this is newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 4 because our means of communication have “something contingent or material about them” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 37). therefore, our inner worlds of experience can only be expressed imperfectly. an excessive focus on the propositional component of language contributes to this incomplete expression; for augustine, only through “embeddedness in dialogue” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 37) can language come closer to expressing our inner worlds. the power of the dialogical process is a concept developed further by gadamer in the twentieth century. phenomenology’s primary focus is on subjective, first-person experience; therefore, it is not surprising that later proponents of the phenomenological project took up language’s limitations for revealing the inner world. augustine’s work had a dual influence on later hermeneutic scholars drawing upon augustine, it became a “universal claim of hermeneutics that one can never say all that lies in inner speech” (moules, 2002, p. 4), but it was also recognized that “language is an instrument that mediates our relation to the world and to other minds” (mendelson, 2010, p. 33). language and tradition. augustine’s deliberations on language included meditations on its nominalistic nature in the greek tradition, whereby language, and propositional language in particular, has a singular and technical meaning and is therefore forgetful of itself (grondin, 1991/1994). the relationship between language and tradition, and the tradition that is carried within language, is a hermeneutic theme later picked up by gadamer, who credited augustine’s theological reflections in shaping his understanding (grondin, 1991/1994). martin luther, 1483-1546. the development of hermeneutics occurred alongside the rise of protestantism (grondin, 1991/1994; moules, 2002). german theologian martin luther had significant influence on the history of protestantism and the christian church and on the history of ideas more generally (grondin, 1991/1994). although luther’s initiatives to reform the church “laid the basis for a hermeneutic revolution . . . one might modestly inquire whether luther himself really developed a hermeneutic theory” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 40). luther’s sole professorial interest was scriptural exegesis, and he rejected philosophy as an empty scholastic pursuit (grondin, 1991/1994; moules, 2002). luther adhered to the principle of sola scriptura that is, the meaning of scripture, when read with faith and revealed through god’s grace, is selfevident and “wielded [the principle of sola scriptura] against tradition and the church’s magisterial establishment” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 40). luther’s most significant contribution to hermeneutics may have been the rejection of authority and tradition as the sole arbiters of (scriptural) meaning; four centuries later, in the twentieth century, gadamer returned to the idea of tradition and interpretation. friedrich daniel ernst schleiermacher, 1768-1834. the german theologian and philosopher friedrich schleiermacher has been credited as “one of the first to write systematically about hermeneutics as a generic form” (smith et. al, 2009, p. 22) and as “the father of contemporary hermeneutics” (moules, 2002, p. 4). he advanced an understanding of interpretation that included: the goal of determining the meaning of a text through reconstructing the intention and perspective of the author (and the possibility of understanding the author’s meaning better than he understood it himself), methods of grammatical and technical interpretation, a distinction between laxer and stricter practices of interpretation and a belief in misunnewberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 5 derstanding as the natural state from which interpretation proceeds, and clear identification of the relationship between the part and the whole (grondin, 1991/1994; moules, 2002; smith et al., 2009). reconstructed meaning. schleiermacher articulated the ideal outcome of interpretation of a text as a true reconstruction of the author’s intended meaning “what we are looking for is the very thought that the speaker wanted to express” (schleiermacher, 1809-1810, as cited in grondin, 1991/1994, p. 68). therefore, the best interpretation of a text is not that text’s meaning for the interpreter but rather the reconstructed meaning of the text from the perspective of the author achieved in its ideal form in an understanding of the author’s meaning that is superior to the author’s own. schleiermacher understood this to be an infinite task, as grondin (1991/1994) described: “the goal of understanding better, conceived in terms of an unreachable telos and the impossibility of complete understanding, bears witness to the fact that the endeavor to interpret more deeply is always worthwhile” (p. 71). grammatical and technical interpretation. for schleiermacher, grammatical interpretation involved finding the precise objective meaning of a text (as constituted by linguistic syntax), while technical (or psychological) interpretation addressed the special art employed by the author within the parameters of his linguistic tradition (grondin, 1991/1994). grammatical interpretation was therefore focused on the supraindividual linguistic patterns that shaped the text’s meaning, while technical interpretation was focused on the individuality of the text’s author (smith et al., 2009). stricter and laxer interpretation and misunderstanding as the natural state. schleiermacher differentiated between two purposes and methods of interpretation the laxer practice, which he associated with clarifying areas of textual misunderstanding (e.g., illuminating obscure scriptural passages), and the stricter practice, which assumed misunderstanding as the normal starting point against which a rigorous hermeneutics would guard at every turn (grondin, 1991/1994). schleiermacher’s assertion of misunderstanding, rather than understanding, as the natural state was one of his greatest contributions to the hermeneutic project. calling on the interpreter to question his own self-evident understandings at every stage to some degree foreshadowed husserl’s phenomenological attitude (although husserl was concerned not with the author’s intended meaning in a text but with letting objects and phenomena appear as they really are, untainted by the natural attitude). wilhelm dilthey, 1833-1911. wilhelm dilthey, a german historian and philosopher, began his study of hermeneutics after schleiermacher’s student, august bockh, introduced him to schleiermacher’s work (moules, 2002). dilthey’s conception of the human sciences as epistemologically and methodically distinct from the natural sciences and his advancement of lived experience as the basis for all understanding set the groundwork for the emergence of phenomenology. the natural versus the human sciences. dilthey advanced an epistemological and methodological distinction between the natural and human sciences (makkreel, 2012). the purpose of the natural sciences is explanation based on natural laws, dilthey asserted, while the purpose of the human sciences (the social sciences and humanities) is to develop an understanding of the meaning of history and human life (makkreel, 2012). the human sciences involve analysis of “the more complex networks of the historical newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 6 world and the actual givens of human beings” (makkreel, 2012, p. 10) rather than the artificial abstraction of mechanistic reality undertaken in the natural sciences; therefore, the laws discovered in the human sciences will always be partial and situated that is, the laws “will apply not to history in general, but to specific cultural systems or social organizations only” (makkreel, 2012, p. 10). dilthey sought to “conceptualize the human sciences as autonomous sciences and defend them from the encroachments of natural science and its methodology” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 84). lived experiences. dilthey’s focus on lived experiences was a central element of his philosophy (makkreel, 2012). in his view, lived experiences constituted selfgiven reality involving thinking, feeling, and willing (makkreel, 2012), that is, the facts of consciousness (grondin, 1991/1994). in order for the human sciences to extend knowledge beyond our own individual understandings, they “must be rooted in the original fullness and richness of our lived experience” (makkreel, 2012, p. 12). dilthey’s conceptualization of lived experienced formed the basis for the later development of phenomenology. edmund husserl, 1859-1938. transcendental phenomenology. the german mathematician and philosopher edmund husserl has been credited as “the principal founder of phenomenology” (beyer, 2011, p. 1). husserl developed transcendental phenomenology, an approach to understanding human experience that “has us focus on the essential structures that allow the objects naively taken for granted in the ‘natural attitude’ (which is characteristic of both our everyday life and ordinary science) to ‘constitute themselves’ in consciousness” (beyer, 2011, p. 3). transcendental phenomenology, meant to be a “rigorous science,” was husserl’s response to science’s neglect of the “specifically human questions” (husserl, 1954/1970, p. 7). understanding husserl’s transcendental phenomenology requires an appreciation of his theories about the life-world, the intentionality of consciousness, the natural and phenomenological attitudes, eidetic reduction, phenomenological reduction, and intersubjectivity, each of which i will discuss briefly in turn. husserl, who converted to protestantism in adulthood, was the son of non-orthodox jews. he was persecuted in nazi germany, losing his professorship and access to the university library (zahavi, 2003). more than 40,000 pages of husserl’s manuscripts were rescued and removed from germany by franciscan herman leo van breda after husserl’s death in 1938 (beyer, 2011; zahavi, 2003). unfortunately, almost the entire first printing of a posthumously published work was destroyed (zahavi, 2003). the life-world. the life-world, or lebenswelt, as originally conceptualized by husserl, is the pre-reflective, pre-theoretical world of everyday experience, and it is this world of immediate lived experience that is the focus of his transcendental phenomenology (van manen, 1990). the life-world is prescientific, and therefore stands in contrast to the scientific world: in our prescientific experience, the world is given concretely, sensuously, and intuitively. in contrast, the scientific world is a system of idealities that in principle transcend sensuous experience. whereas the lifeworld is a world of situated, relative truths, science seeks to realize an idea about strict and objective knowledge that is freed from every relation to the subjective first-person perspective. whereas the objects in the newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 7 lifeworld are characterized by their relative, approximate, and proximal givenness . . . the objects of science are characterized as relative, nonperspectival, univocal, and exact. (zahavi, 2003, pp. 126–127) the life-world, as the world of subjective human experience, forms the foundation for scientific ways of knowing (encyclopedia britannica, 2012). husserl’s transcendental phenomenology advanced the lifeworld as a legitimate focus for scientific inquiry. the intentional nature of consciousness. husserl wrote that all consciousness is directed, whether to real or unreal objects in the world (gubrium & holstein, 2000; zahavi, 2003), with the exception of nonintentional “units of consciousness” such as pain (beyer, 2011). intentional consciousness is always attached to an object in the world: “perception, thought, judgment, fantasy, doubt, expectation, or recollection, all of these diverse forms of consciousness are characterized by intending objects . . . the perceived, doubted, expected object” (zahavi, 2003, p. 14). husserl therefore asserted that to understand the nature of consciousness we must also analyze the object to which consciousness is directed (zahavi, 2003). for example, considering the fantasy of a unicorn, we cannot fully understand the form of consciousness that is “fantasy of a unicorn” without analyzing the intended object that is, the essence (or the horizons) of the unicorn (i.e., a unicorn is an imaginary animal; the unicorn is like a horse while not being a horse, etc.). the objects to which consciousness is directed are transcendent more than the “perspectival and horizontal givenness of the object” (zahavi, 2003, p. 95) as perceived or imagined by the subject. zahavi (2003) gives the chair as an example one cannot view the chair from the front and back simultaneously, but nonetheless the chair’s horizons include all of the possible appearances of the chair. the idea of perspectival and transcendent horizons is important in the development of the hermeneutic phenomenological project and must be considered an important influence on gadamer’s later theory on the fusion of horizons. the natural and phenomenological attitudes. the natural attitude is associated with everyday experience (smith et al., 2009). the natural attitude includes many features of our everyday internal worlds, such as our preconceptions, assumptions, constructions, internal beliefs, ego experiences, biases, culture, and judgments (gearing, 2004); and our “practical concerns, folk assumptions, and smattering of scientific knowledge” (zahavi, 2003, p. 11). husserl’s goal was to transcend the “naivety and fallacy of the natural attitude and to move, employing the classic greek dichotomy, from a naive doxa to an episteme, to philosophy as a ‘rigorous science’” (luft, 1998). the phenomenological attitude involves a disengagement from the natural attitude and a reflexive turn “as we turn our gaze from . . . objects in the world, and direct it inward, toward our perception of those objects” (smith et. al., 2009). husserl asserted that in order to objectively analyze the structure and content of consciousness, we must suspend the natural attitude; he developed eidetic and phenomenological reduction to support this “alteration of viewpoint” (zahavi, 2003, p. 11). eidetic reduction. eidetic reduction is an analysis aimed at elucidating the essential properties of an object or experience, those essences without which the object or experience would become something other than the object or experience it is (zahavi, 2003). for example, what are the essential qualities newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 8 that make a tree a tree, rather than a different type of organism altogether? eidetic reduction is intended to uncover the “invariant properties” that transcend the “subjective perception of individual manifestations of that type of object” (smith et al., 2009, p. 14). as a case in point, if i see a white tree, does that mean that to be a tree means to be white? or is whiteness a non-essential variant of being a tree that is, a subjective perception of an individual manifestation of being a tree? phenomenological reduction. phenomenological reduction involves the temporary suspension of preconceptions regarding the phenomena under study and is perhaps the most controversial facet of husserl’s phenomenology. this suspension of presuppositions, called the phenomenological epoche, facilitates “seeing things as they appear . . . returning to the things themselves” (moustakas, 1994, p. 90). phenomenological reduction is achieved through “bracketing” the “taken-for-granted world” (smith et. al, 2009, p. 15) in order to study the essences of phenomena (creswell, 2007). bracketing is a mathematical idea, in which bracketed content within an equation is treated separately (smith et. al., 2009); bracketing in phenomenology means to treat the natural attitude towards an object or experience separately from the phenomenological analysis so that the phenomenon can reveal itself “free of prejudgments and preconceptions” (moustakas, 1994, p. 90). subsequent philosophers such as heidegger and gadamer challenged the feasibility and desirability of bracketing in phenomenological inquiry. intersubjectivity. husserl articulated a complex theoretical model of intersubjectivity. husserl’s conceptualization of intersubjectivity was embodied, experiential, and constitutive (zahavi, 2003). according to husserl, it is through our own embodied subjectivity that we are able to recognize another’s embodied subjectivity as zahavi stated in his analysis of husserl, “it is exactly the unique subject-object status of my body that permits me to recognize another body as a foreign embodied subjectivity” (p. 113). additionally, according to zahavi’s interpretation of husserl, we each understand the other experientially and without access to the other person’s first-person subjectivity: “had i the same access to the consciousness of the other as i have to my own, the other would have ceased being an other and instead have become a part of myself” (zahavi, 2003, p. 114). this point is critical to husserl’s theory of constituting intersubjectivity; the transcendent world (i.e., the objective world) is only made available through intersubjectivity that is: objects cannot be reduced to being merely my intentional correlates if they can be experienced by others as well. the intersubjective experienceability of the object guarantees its real transcendence, so my experience (constitution) of transcendent objects is necessarily mediated by my experience of its givenness for another transcendent subject, that is, by my experience of a foreign worlddirected subject. (grondin, 1991/1994, pp. 115–116) husserl’s student heidegger also takes up intersubjectivity later in the phenomenological project. martin heidegger, 1889-1976. german philosopher martin heidegger was a student of husserl’s who aimed to extend the phenomenological project “heidegger’s approach to phenomenology is often taken to mark the move away from the transcendental project, and to set out the beginnings of the hermeneutic and existential emphases in phenomenological philosophy” (smith et al., newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 9 2009, p. 16). heidegger acknowledged husserl as a formative intellectual influence (smith et al., 2009), while husserl eventually publicly repudiated heidegger’s phenomenology, even referring to him as his antipode (beyer, 2011). key facets of heidegger’s phenomenology included an interpretive stance, a focus on being-in-theworld (dasein), the hermeneutic circle, visible and hidden meanings, and, later in his philosophical career, the role of languageeach of which i will discuss in turn. heidegger’s involvement with national socialism cannot be overlooked in phenomenology’s historical context, and so i will deal briefly with this significant shadow on the phenomenological project as well. interpretive stance. while husserl envisioned a phenomenology that would transcend the natural attitude of everyday life, including our prejudgments about phenomena, heidegger “questioned the possibility of any knowledge outside of an interpretive stance, whilst grounding this stance in the lived world-the world of things, people, relationships and language” (smith et al., 2009, p. 16). for heidegger, one’s foreconceptions, consisting of “prior experiences, assumptions, [and] preconceptions” (smith et al, 2009, p. 25) are brought to each new encounter. simultaneously extending and challenging husserl’s advancement of intentional consciousness, heidegger rejected the possibility of pure reflection because reflection, as a form of consciousness, is “intentional, and therefore never completely separated from the world” (levasseur, 2003, p. 414). dasein. husserl’s transcendental phenomenology was primarily focused on what can be: broadly classified as individual psychological processes, such as perception, awareness and consciousness. in contrast, heidegger is more concerned with the ontological question of existence itself, and with the practical activities and relationships which we are caught up in, and through which the world appears to us, and is made meaningful. (smith et al., 2009, pp. 16-17) therefore, heidegger’s philosophy revived “the ontology of the subject” (moules, 2002, p. 7). the subject of heidegger’s life work, being and time (1962/1927) is “there-being” (dasein), where dasein is the “uniquely situated” quality of ‘human being’” (smith et al., 2009, p. 16). heidegger asserted that dasein is fundamentally relational (intersubjective) dasein is being-with (smith et al, 2009). even being alone is being-with, albeit in a deficient way (smith et al., 2009). heidegger viewed death, and the resulting finiteness and uncertainty of being, as giving dasein a temporal dimension (smith et al., 2009). although dasein is fundamentally being-with, death is significant in that it is faced alone (smith et al., 2009). the nature of dasein presented a fundamental challenge to husserl’s presuppositionless phenomenological project-with dasein involving “the inherently social being who already operates with a pre-theoretical grasp of the a priori structures that make possible particular modes of being” (wheeler, 2011, p. 7). in opposition to husserl’s conception of the phenomenological reduction and the phenomenological epoche, heideggerian philosophy maintains that given the nature of our dasein, “we are unable to completely bracket prior conceptions and knowledge we are necessarily embedded in a historical context” (levasseur, 2003, p. 415). in heideggerian phenomenology, bracketing is considered a specious project (levasseur, 2003). heidegger further develnewberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 10 oped his theory on the role of preunderstanding (fore-conceptions) in his formulation of the hermeneutic circle. hermeneutic circle. the idea of the hermeneutic circle did not originate with heidegger, but it took on new meaning in his philosophy. whereas the hermeneutic circle was previously conceptualized in terms of the relationship between the whole of a text and its parts, or between text and tradition, with heidegger the hermeneutic circle becomes an “existential task with which each of us is confronted” (ramberg & gjesdal, 2009, p. 15). the hermeneutic circle involves an ever-increasing development of understanding as we revise our preunderstandings in light of new experiences: in the hermeneutic circle, we make progress toward sense and meaning by questioning prior knowledge, thus expanding into new horizons of meanings. yet, we never fully arrive, because to arrive would merely represent another stage of pre-understanding. instead, each turn in the circle opens new horizons and possibilities yet resists dogmatic conclusions, because the ongoing project of reflective questions keeps the possibility of new experiences and possibilities alive. (levasseur, 2003, p. 418) according to heidegger, our foreconceptions are necessary prerequisites to new understanding; all interpretations (and all understanding involves interpretation) flow from our presuppositions. appearance-the visible and the hidden. heidegger was interested in what it means for a phenomenon to appear-as explained by smith et al. (2009): “to say something appears suggests that it is entering a new state, as it is coming forth, presenting itself to us and in contrast to a previous state, where it was not present” (p. 24). this is clearly connected to heidegger’s interpretive stance and rejection of a presuppositionless phenomenology; this viewpoint on appearance suggests we cannot view phenomena objectively, because every time we view a phenomenon it appears anew. heidegger was also interested in what is not made visible in the appearance of phenomena what is hidden or concealed (smith et al., 2009). therefore, for heidegger, phenomenological investigation must consider both the manifest and the latent qualities of phenomena as they are revealed (smith et al., 2009). this idea has had important implications for hermeneutic phenomenology, and suggests, for example, that phenomenologists studying accounts of human experience must be alert to both what is being said and what is not being said about an experience. this is in contrast to husserl’s approach, in which the phenomenologist suspends the natural attitude and tries to see only what an object or phenomenon really is. a phenomenologist cannot identify what is not being revealed without recourse to his or her foreconceptions further differentiating heidegger’s interest in the latent content of appearances from a husserlian approach. language. grondin (1991/1994) observed a conscious movement in heidegger’s work towards the importance of language in being. in his later work, heidegger speaks more empathically of language as the “house of being,” yet his beliefs about the limits of language remain (grondin, 1991/1994). reminiscent of augustine, heidegger argued in the final words of the lecture considered to mark the end point of his thought: it is inescapably necessary to overcome the obstacles which make such a saying [of experience] obviously inadequate. newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 11 even the saying that occurs in the form of lecture remains an obstacle of this kind. its saying has been only in propositions. (heidegger, 1969, as cited in grondin, 1991/1994, p. 102) while heidegger gives increasing credence to the role of language in being, he also echoes augustine’s assertion that language is always an inadequate interpretation of inner experience. the importance of language in the hermeneutic phenomenological project is developed more deeply in gadamerian philosophy. heidegger and national socialism. accounts of heidegger’s philosophical work sometimes make mention of his nazi affiliations and sometimes do not. while some scholars present his philosophical ideas without reference to his nazi involvement, others believe his political activities were intimately tied to his philosophical project: everyone-great thinkers included-is capable of errors of political judgment, even egregious ones. however, the more one learns about the heidegger/national socialism nexus, the more one is ineluctably driven to conclude the philosopher himself perceived his nazi involvements not as a random course of action, but as a logical outgrowth of his philosophical doctrines. . . . as a concrete exemplification of eigentliches dasein or authentic existence.” (wolin, 1988, p. 136) while heidegger has been alternately held accountable and exonerated by scholars, the nature and meaning of his nazi involvement remains controversial, especially as it relates to his philosophy. it is fairly well accepted that he was a member of the national socialist party during his rectorship at freiburg university-during which time he gave pro-nazi speeches, eliminated democratic structures within the university, and initiated an end to financial aid for jewish students (peters, 2009). after the war, heidegger was investigated by the denazification committee at freiburg university and banned from teaching until 1949; in 1950 he was made professor emeritus (wheeler, 2011). scholarly attempts to exonerate heidegger have been challenged by the absence of any clear and complete repudiation of national socialism in his later works (wheeler, 2011). heidegger’s nazi involvement cast a shadow over more than heideggerian phenomenology, tainting the phenomenological project more generally (c.f. holmes, 1996). how are we to understand heideggerian phenomenology in light of heidegger’s national socialist activities? wheeler (2011) suggested: it would be irresponsible to ignore the relationship between heidegger’s philosophy and his politics. but it is surely possible to be critically engaged in a deep and intellectually stimulating way with his sustained investigation into being, to find much of value in his capacity to think deeply about human life, to struggle fruitfully with what he says about our loss of dwelling, and to appreciate his massive and still unfolding contribution to thought and to thinking, without looking for evidence of nazism in every twist and turn of the philosophical path he lays down. (pp. 91-92) while the relationship between heidegger’s philosophy and national socialism will likely remain controversial, his philosophical insights continue to influence the phenomenological project today. hans-georg gadamer, 1900–2002. the german philosopher hans-georg gadamer was a student of both husserl and heidegger (moules, 2002). his work is newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 12 known as philosophical hermeneutics, which is focused on understanding and interpretation rather than methodology (moules, 2002). key themes in gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics include methodology and the human sciences, language and conversation, understanding and application, history, and the restoration of prejudice (grondin, 1991/1994, moules, 2002). methodology and the human sciences. gadamer questioned whether acquisition of methods unique to the human sciences was a necessary prerequisite to the human sciences securing legitimate science status, and even whether methodology could be the sole arbiter of validity (grondin, 1991/1994). the hermeneutic task in relation to the human sciences is therefore not to develop a methodology for correct interpretation, but to “demonstrate the untenability of the idea of universally valid knowledge” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 107). the human sciences deal with a different type of truth than the natural sciences, and are better suited to a humanistic discourse than is the methodological, objectifying discourse of the natural sciences (grondin, 1991/1994). moules (2002) described gadamer’s interpretation of truth as “the event of meaning, rather than something of objectivity of repetition. to say that we uncover truth in understanding simply means that we have found a meaningful account that corresponds to experience” (p. 11). language and dialogue. language occupies a central place in gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. gadamer asserted that understanding is not something possessed by the individual, but rather something that emerges through participation in “meaning, tradition, and ultimately a dialogue” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 119). for gadamer, language and interpretation in the human sciences are understood in a dialogical, question-and-response framework because “to understand a text or an event is to understand it as a reply to a question” (grondin, 1999/2003, p. 125). here gadamer returns to augustine’s delimitations of propositional language, in comparison to the greater expressive potential of language embedded in the dialogical process. gadamer devoted significant space in his writing to reflecting on the nature of true conversation, both in form and purpose. genuine conversation, to gadamer, does not involve competing for the supremacy of one’s opinion; likewise, it is not a summative process in which one viewpoint is added to another (gadamer, 1970/2007). the focus of genuine conversation remains on the topic, and the conversational partners hold this topic in common (gadamer 1970/2007). for gadamer, “genuine conversation transforms the viewpoint of both. . . . [and] involves the shared interpretation of the world which makes moral and social solidarity possible” (gadamer, 1970/2007, p. 96). exploring a topic with a conversational partner in order to come to a better understanding of that topic’s meaning has been taken up as an interviewing strategy in hermeneutic phenomenology along with more traditional strategies aimed at soliciting experiential accounts (van manen, 1990). gadamer’s theory of fusion of horizons relates to both the expansion of understanding that emerges between dialogical partners in genuine conversation and the enlargement of knowledge that arises when an interpreter interacts with a text. in each case, each party (whether a person or a text) possesses its own horizon of understanding, and in a fusion of horizons, they merge to create a new, more expansive understanding of the topic (gadamer, 1977/2007). gadamer’s fusion of horizons has important implications for interpretive interviewers, because it suggests newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 13 the greatest knowledge will be created when both parties in a conversation actively contribute to creating meaning, rather than when the interviewer assumes an objective stance so as not to “taint” the findings or influence the interviewee. understanding and application. rather than approaching interpretation as a purely epistemological or intellectual pursuit, and application of interpretation as occurring after the fact (e.g., jurisprudence), gadamer conceptualized “understanding and application as indivisibly fused” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 115). understanding always involves “applying a meaning to our situation, to the questions we want answered” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 115). central to the act of interpretation is the application of a past text or event to the present (grondin, 1999/2003), an application that is influenced by tradition, history, and custom-so that application becomes an extension of the dialogical search for meaning that precedes the interpreter (grondin, 1991/1994). history. as human beings, gadamer asserted, we are deeply rooted in history-or, as grondin (1991/1994) explained, “we belong to history more than history belongs to us” (p. 116). this means that that our knowledge of history or even of our own historical determinism is always less than the actual workings of history in our lives (grondin, 1999/2003). when writing about the role of history in interpretation, gadamer used the german word wirkungsgeschichte, a word that has proven difficult to translate into english (grondin 1999/2003). grondin (1999/2003) defended “the work of history” as the best translation-“the notion of work gives us a better idea that history is active in us, works in us or penetrates us, to a greater extent than knowledge can penetrate and suspect” (p. 92). in the human sciences, one of gadamer’s principles of the work of history involves the historiography of the topic (grondin, 1999/2003). every topic or research question, no matter how seemingly novel, is part of a larger history of interpretation-“a subject, a problematic, an interrogation will always be inscribed in a tradition, in a debate, of which we must take note” (grondin, 1999/2003, p. 93). the presentation of the historiography of a topic is common practice in the human sciences, usually taking the form of a review of literature leading to the research question (grondin, 1999/2003). prejudice. gadamer argued for the idea of prejudice to be restored to its preenlightenment meaning, before it acquired the negative associations it carries today that of erroneous, unjustified beliefs (gadamer, 1965/2007). in gadamer’s view, “prejudices are biases of our openness to the world. they are simply conditions whereby we experience something whereby what we encounter says something to us” (gadamer, 1965/2007, p. 82). gadamer captured the importance of this concept by saying, “it is not so much our judgments as it is our prejudices that constitute our being” (gadamer, 1965/2007, p. 82). this insight is fertile for understanding hermeneutic phenomenology the researcher’s ability to attend to a phenomenon and draw conclusions about it will necessarily be mediated by his or her prejudices (or pre-judgments). consider, for example, a hermeneutic phenomenologist studying anxiety how would he or she know to inquire about the embodied experience of anxiety unless he or she had prior knowledge (prejudices) concerning anxiety and physical symptoms? in this way, our prejudices will always shape our judgments. jean-paul sartre, 1905-1980. the french philosopher jean-paul sartre continnewberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 14 ued heidegger’s project of existential phenomenology, emphasizing our selfconsciousness and drive for meaning, which is expressed actively in the world through our projects (smith et al., 2009); sartre’s persistent concern with our being-in-the world (dasein) as mediated through our practical concerns (i.e., our projects) continued heidegger’s pragmatic philosophical approach to human experience (flynn, 2011). a few key components of sartre’s philosophy are particularly informative for the hermeneutic phenomenological project: human concern for becoming over being, nothingness, the direction of perception, and freedom (smith et al., 2009). concern for becoming over being. for sartre, human beings are preoccupied with our potential future selves, what smith et al. (2009) describe as “concern with what we will be, rather than what we are” (p. 19). human beings are constantly in process, and “the self is not a pre-existing unity to be discovered, but an ongoing project to be unfurled” (smith et al., 2009, p. 19). the hermeneutic phenomenologist is concerned with the projects taken on by human actors projects that are “embodied, interpersonal, affective and moral” (smith et al., 2009, p. 21). nothingness. sartre, reminiscent of heidegger’s visible and invisible in the appearance of phenomena, was concerned with what he called nothingness, that is, the equal importance of what is absent with what is present in “defining who we are and how we see the world” (smith et al., 2009, p. 19). if we are equally defined by the absent in existential phenomenology, the phenomenologist must consider what might be missing from any account of experience. for example, is belongingness what is absent in an account of loneliness? the direction of perception. we do not pursue our projects in a world that belongs only to us, and our relatedness to others shapes our perceptions of the world (smith et al., 2009). the direction of perception is a dual process encompassing both how the world changes as we perceive others in it, and how it changes us as we perceive ourselves being perceived within the world (smith et al., 2009). sartre’s extension of heidegger’s concept of worldliness to include personal and social relationships, and of experience as “contingent upon the presence and absence of our relationships to other people . . . is perhaps the clearest glimpse of what a phenomenological analysis of the human condition can look like” (smith et al., 2009, p. 20). freedom. existentialism emphasizes the freedom and responsibility of human beings to choose what they will become, but this freedom is situated in the complex biographical and social content of individual action (smith et al., 2009). sartre’s freedom is a salient reminder that human beings are subjects who actively interpret and construct the world (see also mead, 1962). social work and hermeneutic phenomenology i encourage social work researchers to consider hermeneutic phenomenology as an appropriate methodology for knowledge building in the discipline. several features of hermeneutic phenomenology seem especially suited to social work research, including its focus on inquiry as application, emphasis on the situated nature of human experiences, concept of attention to the unspoken or undisclosed, idea of the hermeneutic circle as a link between individual experiences and larger structures, fusion of horizons, and inclusion of the practitioner identity in research activities. newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 15 social work is an applied discipline with a focus on social justice, the pursuit of which is an obligation included in the code of ethics for canadian social workers (canadian association of social workers, 2005). according to davey (2006), “understanding does not merely interpret the world but changes it” (p. xiv). therefore, it is appropriate to include a focus on praxis in interpretation in social work research. madison (1990) stated “a good understanding will be “suggestive” or fertile in that it raises questions that stimulate further research and interpretation” (p. 30). heidegger used the term dasein (therebeing) to emphasize the profoundly situated nature of human experience and the relationships and activities from which experience and meaning emerge (smith et al., 2009). social work is a highly situated endeavor, composed of a complex web of relational, structural, practical, and axiological concerns; heidegger’s dasein is therefore a much more generative image for social work researchers than husserl’s pre-reflective lebenswelt. additionally, a hermeneutic approach allows engagement with participants in a meaningful way clarifying, wondering, and trying out interpretations in a way that creates a broader horizon of understanding than a strictly objective approach. utilizing a hermeneutic phenomenological approach allows the social work researcher to attend to what is unspoken, as well as what is spoken, and in doing so to invite the shadow side of social work back into the interpretation. many experiences where social work is situated involve pain and shame, and are not easily talked about in the larger societal discourse experiences such as trauma, mental health challenges, and abuse. most social workers are skilled in listening for both what is not said about these experiences as well as what is said an approach that can be extended into research activities. like social work, hermeneutic inquiry requires researchers to operate from a position of closeness to, and great sympathy with, their research participants and, at a deeper level, their human conditions of which the (social worker) researcher is an acknowledged part. detachment from clients may be a marker of burnout in social workers, and a willingness to enter into clients’ life worlds in a way that eases pain and facilitates positive change is required of social workers. entering with clients this way, often acting as a witness to both the darkest and most life-giving experiences of human life, changes the social worker in some very fundamental way. the committed social worker will enter again, and again, and again into these places, coming out each time as someone at least slightly changed. as social workers and clients bring their personal and practice experiences to each encounter, so too are they changed by each other a hermeneutic circle. social workers bring all of their humanness to their work with clients. the social worker’s own humanity is the foundation of all he or she will achieve as a helper, advocate, and witness. social constructionist perspectives, which are consistent with hermeneutic inquiry, recognize the socially constructed nature of reality and the inter-subjectivity of knowledge. the inter-subjectivity of the social worker and client is mirrored in the inter-subjectivity of researcher and participant. this “fusion of horizons,” as expressed by gadamer, refers to the fluid meanings, ideas, and experiences of participants, which are situated in a changing historical context (lopez & willis, 2004). much of social work practice, whether in a clinical, community, or educational contexts, is concerned with making sense of, and often newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 16 transforming, painful social experiences (i.e., disrupting oppressive discourses). the hermeneutic approach extends these sensemaking activities to the research realm. cocreation of meaning is central to this approach. action is at the heart of social work social work is an applied discipline focused on change. in order for real change to happen, we must first create a different set of meanings about the situations we find ourselves in, and then take action to transform those situations. some narratives are more limiting than others, and social workers work with clients and the public to question limiting narratives and co-create new ways of understanding private troubles and public issues. as clients may be changed by their work with social workers, so too are social workers changed, often irrevocably, by their work with clients. the social worker, forging yet another professional identity as a researcher, cannot and should not shed the earlier practitioner self. the emergence of the novice social work researcher is another interpretative process in the web of self and profession, in which it is not enough to acquire technical competence. rather, the novice researcher is called to explore the values of their work and the values of the research endeavor to arrive at a beginning place of congruence and commitment. once again, a new self emerges from the old. note the joseph-armand bombardier doctoral scholarship from the social sciences and humanities research council provides support for the author’s research and scholarship. references beyer, c. (2011). edmund husserl. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (winter 2011 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/husserl/ canadian association of social workers. (2005). code of ethics. retrieved from canadian association of social workers website: http://www.casw-acts.ca/ creswell, j. w. (2007). qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). thousand oaks, ca: sage. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: state university of new york press. flynn, t. (2011). jean-paul sartre. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (spring 2012 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sartre/ gadamer, h. g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). (j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h. g. (1965/2007). the universality of the hermeneutical problem. (d. e. linge, trans.). in the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (r. e. palmer, ed.)(pp. 72-88). evanston, il: northwestern university press. gadamer, h. g. (1970/2007). language and understanding. (r. e. palmer, trans.). in the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (r. e. palmer, ed.) (pp. 89-107). evanston, il: northwestern university press. gadamer, h. g. (1977/2007). classical and philosophical hermeneutics. (r. e. palmer, trans.). in the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (r. e. palmer, ed.) (pp. newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 17 41-71). evanston, il: northwestern university press. gearing, r. e. (2004). bracketing in research: a typology. qualitative health research, 14(1), 1429–1452. doi: 10.1177/1049732304270394 grondin, j. (1991/1994). introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. (j. weinsheimer, trans.). new haven, ct: yale university press. grondin, j. (1999/2003). the philosophy of gadamer. (k. plant, trans.). montreal, qc, canada: mcgill-queen’s university press. gubrium, j. f., & holstein, j. a. (2000). analyzing interpretive practice. in n. k. denzin & y. s. lincoln (eds.), handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 487–508). thousand oaks, ca: sage. holmes, c. a. (1996). the politics of phenomenological concepts in nursing. journal of advanced nursing, 24(3), 579–587. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.22719.x husserl, e. (1954/1970). the crisis of the european sciences and transcendental phenomenology. (d. carr, trans.). evanston, il: northwestern university press. laverty, s. m. (2003). hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. international journal of qualitative methods, 2(3), 21–35. retrieved from: http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php /ijqm/index levasseur, j. j. (2003). the problem of bracketing in phenomenology. qualitative health research, 13(3), 408–420. doi: 10.1177/1049732302250337 life-world. (2012). in encyclopedia britannica. retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/ebchecked/topic /340330/life-world lopez, k. a., & willis, d. g. (2004). descriptive versus interpretative phenomenology: their contributions to nursing knowledge. qualitative health research, 14(5), 726–735. doi: 10.1177/1049732304263638. luft. s. (1998). husserl’s phenomenological discovery of the natural attitude. continental philosophy review, 31(2), 153–170. doi: 10.1023/a:1010034512821 madison, g. b. (1990). the hermeneutics of post-modernity: figures and themes. indiana, il: university of indiana press. makkreel, r. (2012). wilhelm dilthey. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2012 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dilthey/ mead, g. h. (1962). mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. chicago, il: university of chicago press. mendelson, m. (2010). saint augustine. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (winter 2010 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/augustine/ moran, d. (2000). introduction to phenomenology. london, england: routledge. moules, n. j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes. an ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods, 1(3), 1–40. retrieved from newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 18 http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php /ijqm/index moustakas, c. (1994). phenomenological research methods. thousand oaks, ca: sage. mullaly, b. (1997). structural social work (2nd ed.). don mills, ontario, canada: oxford university press. payne, m. (2005). modern social work theory (3rd ed.). chicago, il: lyceum books. peters, m. a. (2009). editorial: heidegger, phenomenology, education. educational philosophy and theory, 41(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00516.x ramberg, b., & gjesdal, k. (2009). hermeneutics. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2009 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hermeneutic s/ smith, j. a., flowers, p., & larkin, m. (2009). interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. london, on, canada: sage. van manen, m. (1990). researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. london, england: the althouse press. wheeler, m. (2011). martin heidegger. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2009 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger/ wolin, r. (1988). the french heidegger debate. new german critique, 45, 135–161. retrieved from http://ngc.dukejournals.org zahavi, d. (2003). husserl’s phenomenology. stanford, ca: stanford university press. corresponding author: whitney c. turcato, rn, bn email: whitney.turcato@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics october 25, 2016 the author(s) 2016 knowing people and interpretive practice whitney c. turcato, graham mccaffrey, & nancy j. moules abstract this paper is my response to the statement “all nursing is interpretive.” using an exemplar from my experience as an outreach nurse with the homeless population, i provide my perspective on how nursing is not only interpretive, but how interpretation is an integral component of nursing practice across practice settings. it is demonstrated that interpretation not only helps us to know people, but can also help us navigate our settings and at times keep us safe. it is written in the first person from the perspective of the first author. keywords hermeneutics, interpretation, nursing, mental health nursing, outreach nursing i (turcato) entered into my career as a mental health outreach nurse when i was a new graduate. i continued with outreach nursing until just recently. when i reflect back on the years i spent working alone in the community, i at times wonder how it was that i kept myself safe. there were many aspects of the job that were hazards to my safety. there were homicidal clients not wanting to take their medication, or unknown guests hiding under the bed. at times, violent pets would greet us at the door, along with intoxicated relatives. there may have been weapons in the home, and every once in a while a known drug dealer would make a cameo appearance during an inhome session. with little protection from these hazards, and the continuing presence of such hazards in current day outreach work, i have always found myself interested in how nurses maintain their own safety when working alone in the community. in conversation with these nurses, i have often heard that they keep themselves safe at work because in one way or another, they know the people with whom they work. in the following paper, i will focus on the outreach turcato, mccaffrey, & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 15 2 nurse’s work as an interpretive practice, and how this relates to the outreach nurse knowing their patient. throughout the paper, i will use an exemplar that is adapted from real practice in order to illustrate aspects of outreach nursing. the following is the beginning of my exploration of the outreach nurse using the lens of “nursing is an interpretive practice.” marvin is dying. again. the nurse glanced at the alarm clock on the side table. three thirty a.m. she knew the culprit, the one who had woken her from sleep by bringing to life her worn blackberry that her workplace had provided. “marvin…” she exhaled as she reached to answer the singing blackberry. “hello, you’ve reached the on call line, this is whitney.” she tried to sound inviting. “whitney, it’s marvin. i’m dying,” the nurse took an exasperated deep breath before replying; “you’re not dying marvin.” to which he predictably retorted “yes i am. i’m dying.” the nurse smiled a little. marvin, a 45-year-old aboriginal man, had always been one of her favourites. despite his weathered appearance, short temper, tendency towards alcohol and crack abuse and despite struggling with schizophrenia and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, marvin seemed to make friends wherever he went. she admired his spirit and his resourcefulness. “marvin, if you’re dying, then how are we going to go bowling tomorrow?” she was grateful she had something to distract him with. bowling happened to be one of marvin’s favourite activities, and the recreation group happened to be doing just that tomorrow afternoon. “we’re going bowling tomorrow ! yeah, sure, right, i’ll see you tomorrow!” and with that, he left the nurse to finish what was left of her sleep. perhaps the reader is disappointed by this nurse’s response. “she didn’t even complete a mental status exam” or “she should have assessed his physical well-being” are some of the critiques you could be making. perhaps the reader is afraid for this nurse’s license. “you can’t just ignore someone when they say they are dying!” perhaps you are wondering about the efficacy of bowling as an intervention to prevent imminent death. before you rush off to perform an internet search for scholarly articles pertaining to death and bowling, let me put these wonderings and worries to rest. this nurse was not acting negligently, she was not ignoring marvin’s concerns or mortality, nor was she slacking on her nursing duties. this nurse was providing excellent nursing care, utilizing an aspect of nursing that is everpresent and often overlooked. this nurse was interpreting. turcato, mccaffrey, & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 15 3 the interpretation of dying the next morning at the daily meeting, the nurse giggled and rolled her eyes when she told her coworkers about the phone call. they were all too familiar with the early morning calls from marvin. some of the team members reported being on the phone with marvin for up to twenty minutes trying to convince him that he was not dying. c learly, she had entered into a conversation that was there all along. the nurse shared her late night thought process. “i think that he’s becoming very lonely now that he’s out of the shelter and in an apartment by himself. he’s great at finding people to chat with during the day, but at night the on call line is his only source of human contact.” as stated in moules, mccaffrey, field, and laing (2015), “precisely because language is endlessly proliferative, any given word, statement, text or interpretation is finite within the world of meaning” (p. 36). the healthcare team was able to interpret marvin’s word “dying” to mean something that it does not conventionally mean. this was a man who was trying to convey his emotional pain to someone who could help and was able to do so because nursing is an interpretive practice. the popular perception of nursing is that we are in the business of knowing the anatomy of the human body, the diagnoses that ail our physical being, and the treatments that can be utilized to save lives. the truth is that nursing encompasses much more than anatomy, diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. n urses are in the business of knowing people. as nurses, we are constantly balancing what is tangibly in front of us, with what we are sensing, inferring, or interpreting. using our previous experiences with the client in front of us, or using experiences from clients who have been in front of us before, we are able to interpret further into what may be lying just under the surface. this knowing of people is not static, and is forever changing. knowing people is rife with interpretation. what we know of people now, or now, or now will contain different truths, and these truths will be different for each of us. these truths are contingent on context, histories, perspectives, and experience, and thus are ever changing and far from universal. listening to the spidey sense two months later, the nurse parked near the apartment building where marvin lived. it was time for their first meeting of the week. usually, they spent their hour catching up on what trouble marvin found himself in over the weekend, or what he’d been watching on t.v. they usually chatted while the nurse helped him tidy up his apartment, using this time as an opportunity to assess his mental status and general well-being. as the nurse entered the building, and approached marvin’s front door, she began to feel that something was different. something wasn’t right. she subconsciously felt for her worn out blackberry, making sure it was near her if she needed it. she knocked three, maybe four times. marvin wasn’t answering. the nurse remembered many conversations she’d had w ith her seasoned coworkers. they often spoke of that “spidey sense”when they were certain something was not right, although they couldn’t explain how they knew. they had encouraged her to always listen to those sensesbetter turcato, mccaffrey, & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 15 4 safe than sorry, they’d said. the nurse called the front desk at the office “hi, i’m just at marvin’s place. i’m going to try his front door, something’s not right and he’s not answering. can you stay on the line with me? just in case.” the secretaries were seasoned in these sorts of phone calls. the nurse pushed on marvin’s front doorit was unlocked and opened just far enough for the nurse to see inside. marvin was lying in front of the door face down on the tile. he was unconscious. each interaction that we have as nurses informs the next interaction that we have. we are in a constant state of gathering new knowledge and information, and it is with this new knowledge and information that our perspective is changed, and we are changed. not only are we changing as these events keep happening, but the world around us is also changing and evolving. o ur understanding is never static, and is always adjusting in relation to who we were then, who we are now, as well as what setting we were in then, and what setting exists now. this dance of temporality continues on; we collect new information and knowledge and thus a new perspective. all the while, new events happen around us, creating a new setting. in nursing, it is through this processthrough new interactions, new information, and new settings that we begin to know people. nurses are able to know that this heart rate is elevated due to nervousness, and not pathology or this baby’s cry is telling us something is wrong, or that marvin is lonely and not dying. we know these things not because we have concrete evidence. these things are not explicitly stated. we know these things because we are excellent interpreters. the emancipatory event once the acuity of the event had subsided, and marvin was away to the hospital to be cared for, the nurse had time to reflect on what had happened. at some point, she had sensed that something was different when approaching the apartment building. the nurse was addressed by an event of some proportion. this event made the familiar and comfortable world all of a sudden feel strange. the nurse’s way of being was disrupted, and that which she had taken for granted that she would arrive to marvin’s home and his home would greet her the same way that it had done for months priorwas suddenly something to be questioned. this sudden jolt forced her to step back from her deep absorption in the familiar world. the event ever so subtly asked her to examine from a different angle, and to interpret from a different vantage point. the event, however mysterious and evasive it may have been, revealed paths that she had not before noticed and she then exercised judgment and chose to explore a new path. this new path was illuminated only by the event. she was suddenly emancipated from the chains that she had been unknowingly bound by, and was able to keep herself safe. at times, nurses perceive the intangible, and are interpreting at a level that is even below consciousness and is almost innate. whether we call this our “nurses intuition” or the “spidey senses,” we are often reflecting after the event thinking; “how did i know that?” we are able to hear the unsaid, at times being completely unaware of the process that our e xperience is guiding us through; for examples: when a client walks into therapy and without tangible reason, we sense that something has shifted within them; when a patient walks into the waiting room, and the triage nurse senses an emergency before he collapses to the floor; when the outreach nurse knocks on a door, and knows something is wrong on the other side. when we reach a place turcato, mccaffrey, & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 15 5 where we are absorbed in our practice, the phenomenon of hearing the unsaid happens regularly, and at times appears to be a n innate sense. these instances happen across practice settings and can be said to be the essence of nursing as an interpretive practice. conclusion outreach nurses pride themselves on knowing the people that they work with in the community. the way that we know our patients is innately interpretive and is based in language, historical context, current settings, experience, and conversation. while the subject of knowing our patients as outreach nurses requires further inquiry, perhaps in the form of qualitative research, the above may serve as a platform for such further inquiry. it is also worth mentioning that this is one representation of how outreach nurses keep themselves safe while working alone in the community. it is one possible response to the statement “outreach nursing is an interpretive practice.” references moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. microsoft word hoveycraigfinal.docx corresponding author: richard hovey, phd email: rbhovey@gmail.com faculty of dentistry, mcgill university journal of applied hermeneutics february 7, 2012 the author(s) 2012 learning to live with osteoporosis: a metaphoric narrative richard hovey and robert craig abstract a philosophical hermeneutic research approach was chosen to explore the meaning of living with osteoporosis, a degenerative bone disease, through the narratives authored by twelve participants. the findings provided in this article offer a perspective of how one’s shifting sense of self-renewal was expressed through osteoporosis-specific metaphors, which explicated a transformative process of how one learns to live well with osteoporosis. three metaphors were identified and interpretively named the shattering, the surrendering, and the dance. consideration was given to how an interpretation of these findings, through metaphor, may benefit others living with osteoporosis, and how those diagnosed in the future can benefit from shared understandings and conversations about the meaning of living with osteoporosis. as persons endeavored to make meaning of living with their illness, metaphors provided a useful common ground and invitation for discussion, story-telling, and the development of supportive relationships – all implemented as educative methods to positively transition the impacted persons’ physical, emotional, and social traumas toward the possibility of self-renewal. keywords illness narrative, osteoporosis, metaphor, patient experience, philosophical hermeneutics, transformational learning theory language is the fabric that weaves individual lives in and out of the lives of others. (hovey & paul, 2007, p. 58) osteoporosis is sometimes called the silent thief because it steals-away bone mass without any discernible symptoms (osteoporosis canada, 2011). however, over time, when this illness manifests through its diagnosis, or from the first fracturing of the person’s bones, its capacity to disrupt and indiscriminately invade multiple dimensions of one’s health is often overwhelming (crossley, 2003; hovey & paul, 2007). when we are in good health, we take for granted our capacity to engage, move, work, socialize, and play almost effortlessly and without concern for active participation within our personal, physical, social, hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 2 and relational worlds (hovey, 2012). however, a diagnosis of osteoporosis, with or without a bone fracture, can dramatically change one’s sense of self-efficacy and alter the ability to meaningfully participate in our lives (cripe, 2009; hovey, 2006). illness disrupts our lives and creates new personal narratives to describe how we engage in, and interpret, our world. from the inconvenience of a common cold or flu to a diagnosis of cancer, cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, or osteoporosis each presents a unique and specific set of reactions, perceptions, and expectations (fife, 1994; frank, 2009; hovey, 2006; hovey & paul, 2007; hydén, 1997; nielsen, brixen, & huniche, 2011; shapiro, 2011; solimeo, weber, & gold, 2011). the diagnosis, treatment, and possibility for recovery are contingent on multiple factors such as the extent and severity of the illness, the degree of vulnerability of the ill person, and possible restrictions for social engagement with others. communication within the context of the health care providerpatient relationship necessitates finding a common ground where the medical practitioner and the patient and family can achieve an understanding of what is happening to them. in this article, we describe a philosophical hermeneutic inquiry that explored the experience and meaning of people living with osteoporosis. our intention in this article is to offer insights and understandings from participants who have learned, or are learning to live, with osteoporosis, and with these insights, to better develop health care education, promotion, and practice initiatives that enhance the lives of people living with osteoporosis. we explored the transformative process of learning to share the collective understanding of others` illness experiences, and provide firsthand narrative accounts of persons living with osteoporosis. these perspectives offer new insights into how people learn to live with this chronic illness and help to interpret key lessons for those providing care (cripe, 2009; hovey, 2006; hovey et al., 2011). for persons living with osteoporosis and their families, the sharing of osteoporosis stories offers a possibility to connect with others both pragmatically and relationally – about the meaning of living with this illness (charron, 2006; hovey & paul, 2007). background persons living with a diagnosis of osteoporosis can be regarded as an illness to be treated, “within a medical system whose currency is diagnosis, difference is often defined through disease” (metzl & poirier, 2004, p. vi). in addition to the physical treatment of the illness, those impacted have also identified as persons living in a world comprised of relationships, families, social-relational networks, educational endeavors, work, activities, and self precariously hinged on the hope for a healthy and meaningful future (black, 2002; hovey, 2006; smith & sparkes, 2008). consequently, conversations about the impacts of osteoporotic symptoms on one’s physical well-being also commonly include references to the social, relational, and personal implications of osteoporosis on their previously-known ways of living their lives (hovey, 2006; metzl & poirier, 2004). having osteoporosis means that it is always on my mindand with the need to be careful, but sometimes you get thinking about something else and you start to do things as you always have and then you think:“should i be doing this?” the above quote from a participant illustrates the transition from being diagnosed with osteoporosis to living under constant vigilance with previously-taken-for-granted activities, in order to prevent further injury hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 3 and suffering. osteoporosis can become a constant concern and through and its expression, the illness narrative helps in humanizing the experience (frank, 2009; tamas, 2009). as human beings we create narratives to interconnect and make sense of all aspects of our internal and external lives through humanizing narratives (hovey, 2006; hovey & paul, 2007). concerning illness narratives, frank (2009) reminded us, “…that all aspects of life need narration. to be human is not simply to live a life but to reflect on that life by telling it in multiple ways to multiple audiences, throughout the course of our lives” (pp. 187-188). the illness narrative becomes part of our inclination to humanize illness, rather than enduring the “dehumanization that [osteoporosis] patients have experienced at the hands of some medical practitioners and in the cultural imagination.” (deshazer, 2009, p. 216; hovey, 2006) the illness narrative becomes an opportunity, cathartically and therapeutically, for the person telling their experiences to help locate the illness within their life context and to help in the process of learning to live with chronic illness and to engage in self-renewal (fife, 1994; lange, 2004; rimmon-kenan, 2006). through the explication of illness narratives, the opportunity to learn with, from and about, those living with illness as a knowledgeable other person is created (hovey & craig, 2011). engagement with, and learning from, people living with osteoporosis affords the means to incorporate their narratives as knowledge that informs healthcare, illnessspecific education, and real-life priorities, providing support and hope during these new and confusing experiences for those following in the footsteps of being diagnosed with a similar illness. the illness narrative offers both general understandings of the traumas of being diagnosed with a serious illness, as well as a description of the illness’ particular symptoms and characteristics. the persons diagnosed with cancer, diabetes, heart problems, osteoporosis, and other illnesses will create narratives that are specific to their understanding and meaning of how their illness will influence the totality of their lives (hovey, 2012). methods the participants this philosophical hermeneutic research project took place in two major canadian cities. ethical approval was obtained from both the university of calgary and the calgary health region ethics review board. volunteer participants were recruited and after careful explanation of the parameters of the study, they signed an informed consent document. indepth individual interviews were conducted with 12 persons; one male and 11 female participants. participants’ ages ranged from 32 to 83 years, with a mean age of 61.8 years. the length of time living with osteoporosis – by approximate date of diagnosis – was from 2 to 30 years among participants (mean of 10 years). the age of being first diagnosed with osteoporosis ranged from 30 to 65 years of age, with a mean of 52 years of age. research approach the philosophical hermeneutics approach engaged involved the selection of participants who could best inform a perspective on a particular topic and invite a new understanding of it. in philosophical hermeneutics, interpretation is an ongoing process that begins with initial understandings of the research protocol and continues through the interview process, transcription, and textual analysis. these understandings are finally explicated through interpretive writing. this approach relies on a deep engagement with the topic and textual data, and attempts to generate new or differhovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 4 ent understandings through a circular interpretive movement from the narrative parts of the experience to the whole rather than extracting or codifying themes. philosophical hermeneutic participant interviews are semi-structured and conducted in a manner such as, to allow the meaning of the content and context of the experience to be fully expressed from the participant’s perspective, to remain the central topic of exploration. when participants tell of their personal experience out loudinto the worldit joins with the common experiences of others (davey, 2006; gadamer, 1989; kearney, 2003, 2011). the shared collective of unique experiences lead interpretively to an understanding that is respectful of both the singularity of people and their experiences of an event, as well as what is commonly understood when interpreted among many others who have shared in a similar experience. accounts of human experiences, however, are always interpreted from the participant’s social-cultural, historical, and other specific characteristic perspectives. the individual narrative becomes part of the common history of the participant group by showing how one narrative account is an instance of something that can be more commonly understood. it can be stressed, however, that research findings and current understandings are always only provisional to further interpretations. the philosophical hermeneutic research process is inclusive of other perspectives and understandings about a topic. the consequence is that, as narrative texts are read and re-read, they open up other possible interpretations and new understandings. kearney (2011) wrote that hermeneutics: …[r]efers to the practice of discerning indirect, tacit or allusive meanings, of sensing another sense beyond or beneath apparent sense. this special human activity may in turn call for a method of second order, reflective interpretation involving a process of disclosing concealed messages, either by a) unmasking covered-up meaning (hermeneutics of suspicion) or b) by disclosing surplus meaning (hermeneutics of affirmation). (p. 1) metaphor as common ground being diagnosed with an illness such as osteoporosis turns lives upside down. understanding a person`s unique experience necessitated the consideration of a three-part relationship, where one person comes to an understanding with another, engaging with that second person about a topic or conversation, which consequently leads to a new third aspect of the relationship: a shared understanding of the topic common to both participants. this is the work of gadamer’s dialogical hermeneutics: when two people understand each other, they always do so with respect to something and, in this project, the something the topic being understood was the experience of learning to live with osteoporosis (gadamer, 1989). it is through an interpretive process, where the experience of the individual narrative becomes located within others as a collective, that reveals the commonalities within the illness experiences of others and contributes to the collective experience of something through narrative and conversation (davey, 2006; frank, 2009; kearney, 2003). the experiences of the research participants presented in this article were articulated through interpretations of their illness experiences in order to create a common ground for the person and medical practitioner, and enhance the possibility for understanding of such a complex topic (gadamer, 1989; hovey, 2012; lakoff & johnsen, 2003; mccrickerd, 2000; sturmberg, martin & o'halloran, 2010). as gadamer (1989) stated, hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 5 …if a person transfers an expression from one thing to the other, he [she] has in mind something that is common to both of them; but this in no-way needs to be generic universality. rather, he [she] is following his [her] widening experience, which looks for similarities, whether in the appearance of things or in their significance for us…this is its fundamental metaphoric nature. (p. 429) the utility of metaphor provided a vehicle in which the common encounter of living with osteoporosis could be represented within a context that was representative of the unique experiences shared by the participants (hovey, 2006; 2012). these experiences included the reality that an intended, expected, and anticipated life was interrupted by an unexpected, unplanned, and unwelcomed illness. osteoporosis became a serious disruption from a normal and predictable life journey to a transformative passage that involved suffering, courage, and commitment toward healing and self-renewal (gadamer, 1996; hovey, 2006; shenk, davis, & murray, 2008). findings transformational journeys: diagnosis to self-renewal chronic illness may “reduce a person to an exhausted heap, sunk into a sofa or a bed, helpless, weighed down by the unbearable weight of flesh, bone tired” (caputo, 1993, p. 208). i guess it was anger, i don’t know, maybe depressed; i quit the gym and i stopped exercising and i had been exercisingyou knowfor twenty-five years and then i ended up like this. so i just said ‘forget it’ and i stopped everything and i gained weight and i led a much more sedentary lifestyle now. i think that is all because i was very upset and i didn’t talk about it with anybody. shattering. a participant recounts the traumatic and disorientating moment of finding out that she had osteoporosis: “you know undoubtedly when you are first diagnosed it is very traumatic. have you ever seen snow white and the seven dwarfs? do you remember when the queen diverted to the witch? she looked exactly how it feels.” certainly, this participant was not describing a transformation in her appearance similar to that of the witch in the story; rather, in that moment, her quote provides insight into the powerful influence of her diagnosis in distorting her image of self. the participant described her situation emotively through metaphor, as a means of interpreting a wide range of experiences, which were concerning changes to their life since their diagnosis of osteoporosis. participants described the shattering effect of osteoporosis, not only of their own physical conditions, but also the impacts of diagnosis on their emotional and social-relational conditions (hovey, 2012). “i feel like a stupid, little old lady. i don’t think of myself as a little old lady but mincing along [on an icy path] trying to make sure that i’ve got my foot squarely planted so that i’m not going to take a topple.” in this case, the participant deals with both a new perception of herself of becoming “a little old lady” who now must be extremely cautious as she walks with uncertain footing, with a topple becoming a frightening and life-altering concern. a fracture sets into action several life-altering changes created by pain, possible deformity, social isolation, and an altered sense of identity (black, 2002; petrie & weinman, 2006; vitacca, isimbaldi, mainini, & melazzini, 2011). “i am sixtythree and i just turned sixty-three, but i did not think that ‘old’ happened, until you are eightyand so i didn’t intend to think about it [ageing] for a while.” consequently, the explanation of these journeys provided a porhovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 6 trayal about the complex series of progressions, adaptations, and new learning told by the participants. another participant detailed: “it is shattering when you are first diagnosed; you think, my god! i mean most people have this vision of the little old (osteoporotic) woman and the pain is tremendous.” metaphorically and practically, the experience of osteoporosis began with a shattering of bones, which represented the biomedical treatment of the illness, as well as how it influenced and shattered the social-relational aspects of participants’ lives. the shattering was not just about fracturing a bone but also being forced to live their lives differently as the participants became overwhelmed by fear, apprehension, and rapid changes to their perception of self and social identity (crossley, 2003; hovey, 2006; hovey & paul, 2007; kearney, 2003; smith, & sparkes, 2008;). there was also the accumulated frustration that came from living for many years with something unnamed before their osteoporosis was diagnosed and treated. it was traumatic! i was really upset because i could not ski and then i broke my ribs around that time too and so that further indicated that i had osteoporosis. then i broke two toes last year and i either have a broken or cracked rib right now so i just knowyou knowevery time one of these things happens it’s more loss and so you have to grieve. some participants described their initial fracture(s) as a complete surprise: “the fall was nothing.” they were unusual: “i was only lifting a box that i had always lifted;” a minor fall or a sudden, insignificant turn that resulted in a painful and disabling fracture. medical intervention provided crucial care after the shattering; healthcare practitioners eventually made the correct diagnosis, which then led to the appropriate treatment that promoted healing and the future maintenance of their bone density. one participant provided an account of the seriousness of osteoporosis; not the illness per se, but the pain associated with undiagnosed fractures: “i fell down one winter and i had to lie in the snow bank because i could not get up. every time i tried to get up, the pain was excruciating, and i would pass out from time to time. i thought this was a really dangerous situation, the wind was howling like mad, coming across the driveway onto the lane and sidewalk, and i was getting covered with snow.” although these participants’ medical needs were eventually met, finding support for their psychosocial needs was more difficult or nonexistent. a sense of not being heard resulted in stress, depression, and frustration, all of which have been felt by many individuals when time was not taken to fully explain the situation. one of the other things that stressed me [because of osteoporosis] was regarding my grandchildren. i can’t lift too much and i didn’t have it [osteoporosis] with the two oldest grandchildren, but the two youngest, i never related to or bonded quite as close to them because i could not lift them up or cuddle them. the implications of being diagnosed with osteoporosis, with or without fractures, meant the lives of theses participants were shattered, altered, and devastated. “i had no understanding of what i should be doing: ‘how can i help myself?’ i had no idea...” as well, pain medications had effects, “i find if i take too much pain medication it does go to my head. it makes me feel blocked.” the trauma of the diagnosis and fracturing were overwhelming conditions of the shattering. in this phase, the metaphor of being and feeling shattered, predominate as the biomedical aspects of the illness are at the forefront for the patient. knowing darn well if i slip and land on my butt i’m going to be two inches shorter hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 7 when i get up because it is mostly my spine that is really bad. in addition, it was just that feeling of ‘i can’t be like i used to be.’ so influential is pain on us that we withdraw from all external experience of the world. every culture knows something of the profound internalization involved in suffering and the endurance of pain. here we face real difficulty, which is at the heart of learning to live with osteoporosis: the pain, fear of fractures, and an uncertain future (gadamer, 1996; hovey & paul, 2007; vitacca et al., 2011). someone’s suffering from the pain and discomfort of osteoporosis can be amplified by their sense of loss-of-self, where a person living with a chronic illness witnesses a previously held concept of “self” dissolve into another, less positive vision (elofsson & ohlen, 2004; hovey & paul). people without the capacity to develop an equally valuable and meaningful alternative self-concept may be more likely to succumb to the powerful emotions associated with loss of independence, social isolation, perceived changes in social interactions, and thoughts of being a burden to others (hovey, 2006; vitacca, et al., 2011). thinking about the self in this negative light creates profound emotional trauma and suffering that is not often recognized or purposely addressed within the biomedical view of the patient. the process of learning to live with osteoporosis involved a transformation from the ill patient to person living with osteoporosis. the initial focus on the physical manifestations of the illness the shattering centered on the humanistic, social, occupational, intellectual, emotional, and environmental aspects that challenged the participant’s participation within their day-to-day of being-in-the-world. surrendering. the next metaphoric interpretation revealed a second common experience that the participants identified as a critical period of transition as people learning to live with osteoporosis. this became a surrendering to the implications of osteoporosis as a life to be lived differently. this is not a negative surrendering as in giving up hope or losing a battle; rather, it means giving in to the functional reality of their situations with the inherent difficultly and uncertainty of attempting to negotiate and piece fragments of their lives back together as different. the capacity to let go of previously-held perceptions of oneself enabled the consideration of new possible ways of being in the world (rossiter, 2007). the participants who surrendered were able to consider and internalize new possibilities for themselves. during the surrendering phase, adaptation to change became the key element that influenced the reconstruction and perceived quality of their lives. faced with limitations, it became essential to make new experiences and activities meaningful. the pre-osteoporotic world needed to give way to the present. the familiar, anticipated, and expected day-to-day life was reassessed and a new perception of quality of life negotiated. surrendering to that which could not be changed opened up new possibilities. for one participant, working through living with osteoporosis meant meeting a patient advocate supporting others living with osteoporosis. i met someone, a person named em [an osteoporosis patient advocate] who was doing a walk across canada. my company was sponsoring her. i helped with the walk, got to meet em and speak to her, and got myself straightened out. she helped me to put things into perspective what i should be doing, how i could do better. well, it was very fortunate that i came to this understanding because em opened up for me a different and more hopeful vision of what it means to live with osteoporosis. hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 8 personal self-renewal is contingent not only on learning how to manage the physical aspects of osteoporosis but also the other dimensions of health such as, emotional, social, occupational, environmental, intellectual, and spiritual implications (hovey, 2012). for another participant, finding a way to renew her sense of participation was through the acknowledgment that she could no longer be a physical gardener in the way she knew prior to living with osteoporosis. the substantial demands of gardening would be too risky. however, her surrendering provided an alternative means to continue her passion for gardening, which was to teach others. it is always a loss, but, i guess during my life i’ve had to cope with lossso you know you get quite good at it and so i said to myself, ‘i’ll find something else to do,’ and i’ll belong to the ‘green thumbs’ which you know we work in the greenhouses and we have a great time and i still do volunteer work teaching others how to garden. the transformational process is not a passive one as this participant explained: “the patient has to take charge. as an osteoporosis patient, you must take charge of your health, get all the information you can and then put it all together as a lifestyle for yourself. and it seemed to work well for me.” this participant’s surrendering to the reality of her osteoporosis reflected her transition to becoming an empowered patient: “patients don’t understand they think they have to be told what to do, they have to be compliant. i can be compliant, but i am not, because i question why i am doing anything. i don’t do something unless i know why.” the transformation of persons from shattering to surrendering meant finding meaningful ways of re-engaging their world. the transition between these phases is not absolute, as the person living with osteoporosis may find himself or herself cycling back and through each of these phases. although for the person living with osteoporosis a new fracturing of a bone would undoubtedly provide a possible setback within this process, the event is generally not new. as such, their accumulated personal and shared experience of living with osteoporosis and the gathering of valuable lessons and resources over time can help them to prevent and/or cope with future fractures when they occur. although the chronic illness cannot be healed, nor is full recovery from the illness a possibility, the person will often find a means to contextually re-interpret and re-negotiate their life with osteoporosis. life does reconcile with the illness, the pain becomes increasingly manageable, environments are altered for safety, relationships change and evolve, and the implications of living with osteoporosis are no longer unknown and uncertain. although the symptoms of osteoporosis may manifest for the person living with osteoporosis, the surrendering transitions them into a life where the illness is not always at the forefront of the person’s day-to-day world. when the person learns to lives with osteoporosis, it creates a partnership with the illness, one not by choice but through practicality, in which they can begin to move together in the world. dance. the dance represents a transformation from the initial shattering of the person’s life, through learning to work with osteoporosis, toward negotiating a partnership with the illness. the dance metaphorically represents the movement toward self-renewal through a dance with a new partner: osteoporosis. although the illness can only be managed but not cured, it does not have to preoccupy every moment and life-event within that person’s life. i have had to re-create my independence [from osteoporosis] in a different way. hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 9 you have to be really creative. for example, i used to go cross-country skiing with a very nice group of people; i had to give that up so i had to find some substitute. i now go for walks and swim with another group of people. and i found that i had to substitute activities rather than cut out activities. you have to substitute what you liked to do with something else that you really like to do. the key is to find something else that is going to give you a sense of satisfaction from that activity. this participant’s description of what it means to willingly and mindfully let go of certain activities (surrendering) in order to discover new and meaningful others, is an example of the person’s transformation to new ways of life that may be better suited to living with osteoporosis. several participants also talked about the “gifts” of living with osteoporosis: the gift of very great friendships; i met so many wonderful people because of my osteoporosis. while working with osteoporosis canada, many of us supported each other and created a strong network of women helping others. we were a very experienced group, sharing what we knew and experienced about osteoporosis. giving back to others became an additional aspect of this transformational phase for many of the participants. one became an advocate and mentor to her family, friends, and others by telling as many people as possible about her diagnosis and what she has learned during her experiences. as a result of my unexpected diagnosis, i called my sisters who are both younger than me and said ‘listen, look at me. i’m the sign of health…’ where the both of them are not and nowhere as healthy as me. ‘and i’ve got osteoporosisso you better start pushing to find out if you got it.’ well sure enough, they have it (osteoporosis) and they have it worse than me and they are younger than i am. a relief… in that i was able to help them get onto the path of health. characteristically, the dance meant a transition and ‘letting go’ of some aspects of preosteoporosis life toward other possibilities, in order to be able to consider a new possible self (rossiter, 2007; shenk et al., 2008). “you can choose to dwell on your losses, or you can choose to do something positive. there are things i will never be able to do again. i would love to go skating, or play golf. my husband and i used to golf all the time. now i am scared to death to do it one mighty swing and i am back to where i was.” the idea of being cautiously attentive to one’s external world became extremely important. the dance with osteoporosis entailed (re) negotiating an altered future for many, including increased vigilance to the dangers present in their external environment, while finding new ways to engage in life. “if i choose to do more positive things, assessing the risks of what i do, i also choose to know what my losses have been and say, ‘okay, but i can also still do so many things’.” living well with osteoporosis means becoming a partner in the dance of life, no longer being led by the disease. discussion the physical symptoms associated with osteoporosis present a particular set of new restrictions, challenges, and acquired limitations for those affected. the transformative aspect of self-renewal begins with physical considerations because pain alienates one from oneself (gadamer, 1996). for the person living with osteoporosis, pain became an ever-present fear and substantive obstacle on the journey to self-renewal. as one participant shared, “the days i’m in a lot of pain, i just withdraw. i hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 10 just lie down and when you are not yourself, so you tend to withdraw.” gadamer (1996) explained that, with … pain, we cannot see paths and solutions in advance, yet we must ask ourselves if there will not always remain new possibilities. we encounter for example the loss of personhood. this happens within medical science when the individual patient is objectified in terms of a mere multiplicity of data. but the question is whether the unique value of the individual is properly recognized in this process. (p. 81) a person suffering with the pain and discomfort of osteoporosis may often realize that the physical symptoms can be amplified by one’s sense of loss of self (black, 2002; elofsson & ohlen, 2004; hovey, 2006). those who lack the capacity to reconceptualize and reconfigure an equally valuable and meaningful self-concept are more likely to succumb to the powerful emotions associated with a loss of independence, social isolation, perceived changes in social identity, and the perception of becoming a burden to others (vitacca et al., 2011). thinking about oneself in this negative light can create profound emotional trauma that is not often recognized within the biomedical view of suffering (black, 2002; charmaz, 1983; hovey & paul, 2007; smith & sparkes, 2008; tamas, 2009). the findings from this research study can provide insight into the transformative aspects of people living with, and working through, osteoporosis in order to re-engage with their lives as meaningfully as possible. this reengagement enlisted a process of critical reflection, in which transforming one’s perceptive provided the opportunity to create new understandings of how one adjusts to living with osteoporosis and facilitates a process of self-renewal. in this regard, the process of learning to live with osteoporosis was described metaphorically as the shattering, surrendering, and the dance. this process, described using metaphoric images from participants’ narratives, aligned closely with the tenets of transformational learning theory (mezirow, 1995; mezirow, 2000). transformational learning theory suggests that transformative learning occurs when individuals confront and engage in critical reflection on disorienting dilemmas such as a diagnosis of a serious illness. this traumatic, disorienting diagnosis for participants was the shattering and the pain of the physical, emotional, and social-relational impacts of chronic illness and cancer. (brigham, 2011; fife, 1994; lange, 2004; merriam, caffarella, & baumgartner, 2007; mezirow, 2003) the transformation toward ‘working through’ osteoporosis meant an in-depth exploration of the illness’ meaning to those affected with consideration of the roles, relationships and actions required to achieve a renewed sense of personal identity (black, 2002; hovey, 2006; kearney, 2003; smith, & sparkes, 2008; weston, norris, & clark, 2011) this process of working through their diagnosis, and finding meaningful ways to re-engage in selfrenewal was identified by researchers as the surrendering. the kind of learning involved in this stage is one in which people living with the diagnosis of osteoporosis cannot return to how they once were. for such a renewal to occur, people learning to live with osteoporosis must negotiate and work through the chaotic disorder of their new worlds (merriam et al.; hovey; lange; mezirow). researchers, through the metaphor of a dance, interpreted the result of the negotiation toward self-renewal, where the person living with osteoporosis negotiates a way to move through life. this dance is one of grace and dignity where the person engages the world differently but with a sense of self-renewal. hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 11 as biomedical diagnoses and treatment protocols for osteoporosis become more efficient and effective, our attention to the person learning to manage illness and its influences expands. living with a chronic health condition means that even when it is being wellmanaged, it is always present. the transformation of a life – from fracture and/or diagnosis of osteoporosis, to a functional and favourable result – cannot be described as a linear trajectory from diagnosis to cure. rather, the conversations described a series of interconnected experiences that have been – for the purpose of this article – defined as the shattering impact of diagnosis, the participant’s surrendering to a new reality and the partnered dance of living a renewed and significant life. learning to live with osteoporosis not only means learning to live with physical manifestations and symptoms but also with disquieted thoughts about the present and future. as the pain and discomfort subside, a space is cleared for the humanizing activities of self-renewal. as rossiter (2007) stated, … transition involves rehearsing attitudes and behaviours, visualizing oneself as having achieved a hoped-for goal represented by a possible self. rehearsing and visualizing enable one to assess one's own comfort with moving in that direction. it is at this point that some possibilities are discarded and others more fully embraced. (p. 93) the shattering, surrendering and the dance, as osteoporosis-specific metaphors, describe the transformative process worked through by all participants as part of their unique life experiences. as individuals who have shared in a common experience, each transformation and each step toward self-renewal depended upon a multiplicity of factors such as the severity of the symptoms; the individual’s personality; experience with resiliency and adaptation; levels of education, social support, medical support; and age at the time of diagnosis (hovey, 2006; vitacca et al., 2011). each individual experienced unique and widely-differing moments as part of living with osteoporosis, and yet the transformation towards a renewed reality through the development of new emotional and socialrelational experiences was shared among all affected. return to person centeredness patient/person centeredness calls for ethical consideration and an interdisciplinary approach to learn from those who have already experienced osteoporosis; to discover how they became able to live with their illness (beadle-brown & mansell, 2004; crossley, 2003; hovey et al., 2011). this research project provided the means to ask questions and collect instructive narratives meant to complement and extend objective medical discourse of chronic illness, treatment, and recovery. while changes to one’s physical characteristics and personhood occur slowly and over time, a diagnosis of osteoporosis can abruptly alter our perception of ageing (beadlebrown & mansell; black, 2002). in this article, we provide insight into the experience of learning to live with osteoporosis from the personal perspectives of those who have worked through this process and desire to share their experiences with other patients, healthcare providers, and those working with older adults. understanding the situation of others who have experienced the shattering, surrendering and the dance, as osteoporosisspecific metaphors, describe the transformative process worked through by all participants as part of their unique life experiences. hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 12 traumas can help to create the possibility for better treatment and care, as well as engagement that is softer, more sensitive, and more humanistic. intervening, with a greater understanding of what it means to live with osteoporosis, can allow for specific educative and health promotional activities when, and as, they are needed. encouraging patients’ transformational progress toward self-renewal can not only enhance recovery, but also teach those living with osteoporosis to adapt to the shattering effects of chronic illness, not only to new symptoms and pains, but to a renegotiated way of living in their world. conclusion within our socially-constructed perspectives about those who offer knowledge, information, and education concerning illness experiences, we frequently defer to healthcare and research experts and their understanding of the patient experience. undeniably, healthcare experts’ knowledge and understanding of illness and treatment are invaluable to patients’ long-term recovery from the ‘silent thief of bone mass.’ what may be ignored in the medical process is that the person living with the illness truly becomes the expert of living with that condition. other ways of knowing and understanding which extend to the continuum of care can only be gained with the first-hand experience of something that happens to us or to others. these new and different everyday experiences, narrated from patients as lay-experts, inform the ontological perspective of living with osteoporosis. we need to consider the experiences people accumulate throughout their illness as knowledge guiding the development of health promotion, education, and health care practices, to inform recovery strategies and personcentered practices that enhance the lives of people living with osteoporosis (hovey & craig, 2011). the use of participant narratives to generate osteoporosis-specific metaphors provided an alternative and meaningful explication of the transformational process toward selfrenewal experienced by persons living with chronic illness. understanding the transformational processes (shattering, surrendering, and the dance) specific to this journey entails adopting specific learning and intervention practices that can anticipate and meet the patient/person’s learning needs as they are situated within the process of self-renewal (hovey & craig, 2011). furthermore, we offer in this research that all people learning to live with osteoporosis are multidimensional and dynamic, rather than static and predictable, with the capacity to meet significant challenges throughout their lifetime. from this perspective, the research participants living with osteoporosis revealed a transformative process of selfrenewal defined by the shattering, surrendering, and the dance; these metaphoric interpretations can provide others with the framework to engage in additional conversations about the meaning of living with illness, and the meaning of adapting to new ways-of-being. we issue the invitation to other researchers to interpret and share the diverse experiences of people living with osteoporosis, relying on their expertise of living with a lifechanging chronic illness. we should consider the experiences people accumulate throughout their lives as expert personal knowledge that may guide our approach to developing effective health promotion techniques, educational interventions, and self-management methods for those living with and those who will live with chronic osteoporosis in the future. through careful listening to these experiences, educators, health care providers, and promotion experts can begin to come to an understanding that will inform healthcare practices from a humanistic perspective. on pahovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 13 tient/person centeredness, beadle-brown and mansell (2004) provided that “it is individualized, in that it is intended to reflect the unique circumstances of the individual person…in both assessing and organizing what needs to be done” (p. 1). in this study, a patientcentered approach for research provided new and different perspectives to inform and complement patient treatment protocols and practices going forward. by sharing the experiences of those living with osteoporosis with other patients, health care professionals, and educators, we can begin to truly understand the life-altering impacts of chronic illness, and allow others to follow in those welltrodden footsteps, softly and with purpose. declaration of conflicting interests the authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. bios richard hovey, phd is an associate professor in the division of oral health & society unit, faculty of dentistry, mcgill university with an interest in understanding the experiences of vulnerable / underserved populations. robert craig, ba earned his bachelor of arts (hon.) from the university of toronto and is a researcher with a focus on interprofessional education, patientcentered care, and simulation in health care. references beadle-brown, j., & mansell, j. (2004). person-centred planning or person-centred action? policy and practice in intellectual disability services. journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, 17(1), 1-9. black, h.k. (2002). different ways to hurt: an elderly woman’s narrative of suffering. journal of aging and identity, 7(1), 3-15. caputo, j. d. (1993). against ethics: contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. bloomington, in: indiana university press. charmaz, k. (1983). loss of self: a fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. sociology of health and illness, 5(2), 168-195. charron, r. (2006). narrative medicine: honoring the stories of illness. new york, ny: oxford. cripe, l. d. (2009). the discovered story: the evolution of truth in cancer narratives. literature and medicine, 28(2), vi-x. crossley, m. (2003). let me explain: narrative employment and one patient’s experience of oral cancer. social science & medicine, 56(3), 439–448. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: state university of new york press. deshazer, m. (2009). cancer narratives and an ethics of commemoration: susan sontag, annie leibovitz, and david rieff. literature and medicine, 28(2), 215-236. elofsson, l. c., & ohlen, b. (2004). meanings of being old and living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. palliative medicine, 18(7), 611-618. fife, b. l. (1994). the conceptualization of meaning in illness. social science & medicine, 38(2), 309–316. hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 14 frank, a. w. (2009). tricksters and truth tellers: narrating illness in an age of authenticity and appropriation. literature and medicine, 28(2), 185-199. gadamer, h. g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). (j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshal, trans.). new york: continuum. (original work published 1975). gadamer, h. g. (1996). the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age. (j. gaiger & n. walker, trans.). palo alto, ca: stanford university press. hovey, r. (2006). what does it mean to live with osteoporosis? (doctoral dissertation). retrieved from proquest dissertations & theses. hovey, r. (2012). assessment in health promotion: deconstruction and metaphoric considerations in a nutshell. in g.d. gilmore (ed.), needs and capacity assessment strategies for health education and health promotion (4th ed.). sudbury, ma: jones and bartlett. hovey, r., & craig, r. (2011). understanding the relational aspects of learning with, from, and about the other. nursing philosophy, 12(4), 262-270. hovey, r., & paul, j. (2007). healing, the patient narrative-story and the medical practitioner: a relationship to enhance care for the chronically ill patient. international journal of qualitative methods, 6(4), 53-65. hovey, r., dvorak, m., hatlie, m., burton, t., padilla, j., worsham, s., & morck, a. (2011) patient safety: a consumer's perspective. qualitative health research, 21(5), 662-672. hydén, l. (1997). illness and narrative. sociology of health & illness, 19(1), 48–69. kearney, r. (2003). strangers, gods and monsters. new york: routledge. kearney, r. (2011). what is diacritical hermeneutics? journal of applied hermeneutics. article 1. kind, s. (2008). learning to listen: traces of loss, vulnerability, and susceptibility in art/teaching. in s. springgay, r.l. irwin, c. leggo, & p. gouzouasis, p. (eds.) being with a/r/tography (pp. 167-178). rotterdam, the netherlands: sense publishers. lakoff, g., & johnsen, m. (2003). metaphors we live by. chicago & london: the university of chicago press. lange, e. (2004). transformative and restorative learning: a vital dialectic for sustainable societies. adult education quarterly, 54(2), 121-139. mccrickerd, j. (2000). metaphors, models, and organisational ethics in health care. journal of medical ethics, 26(5), 340–345. merriam, s., caffarella, r., & baumgartner, l. (2007). learning in adulthood: a comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). san francisco, ca: john wiley & son. metzl j.m., & poirier, s. (2004). editors’ preface: difference and identity in medicine. literature and medicine, 23(1), vi–xii. mezirow, j. (1995). transformation theory of adult learning. in m.r. welton (ed.), in defense of the lifeworld (pp. 39-70). new york: state university of new york press. mezirow, j. (2000). learning to think like an adult: core concepts of transformation theory. in j. mezirow (ed.) and associates, learning as transformation: critical perspectives on a hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 15 theory in progress (pp. 3-33). san francisco, ca: jossey-bass. mezirow, j. (2003). transformative learning as discourse. journal of transformative education, 1, 16-37. nielsen, d. s, brixen, k., & huniche, l. (2011). men's experiences of living with osteoporosis: focus group interviews. american journal of men’s health. 5(2), 166-76. osteoporosis canada. (2011). retrieved september from: http://www. osteoporosis.ca/index.php/ci_id/5526/la_id/1.htm petrie, k.j., & weinman, j. (2006). why illness perceptions matter. clinical medicine, 6(6), 536-539. rimmon-kenan, s. (2006). what can narrative theory learn from illness narratives? literature and medicine, 25(2), 241-254. rossiter, m. (2007). possible selves in adult education. new directions for adults and continuing education, 114, 87-94. shapiro, j. (2011). illness narratives: reliability, authenticity and the empathic witness. journal of medical humanities, 37(2), 68-72. shenk, d., davis, b., & murray, l. (2008). in their own words: using narratives to teach gerontology. gerontology & geriatrics education, 29(3), 239-247. smith, b., & sparkes, a. c. (2008). contrasting perspectives on narrating selves and identities: an invitation to dialogue. qualitative research, 8(1), 5-35. solimeo, s.l., weber, t. j., & gold, d.t. (2011). older men's explanatory model for osteoporosis. gerontologist, 51(4), 530-539. sturmberg j. p., martin, c. m., & o'halloran, d. (2010). music in the park. an integrating metaphor for the emerging primary (health) care system. journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 16(3), 409-414. tamas, s. (2009). writing and righting trauma: troubling the autoethnographic voice. forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: qualitative social research, 10(1) article 22. vitacca, m., isimbaldi, c., mainini, a., & melazzini, m. (2011). the frail person and his caregiver: cure, care or simultaneous care? a conceptual article. journal of medicine and the person, 9, 6–12. weston, j. m., norris e.v., & clark, e. m. (2011). the invisible disease: making sense of an osteoporosis diagnosis in older age. qualitative health research, 2(12), 16921704. microsoft word gran corrected proof.docx 1 author address corresponding author: thorvald gran email: thorvald.gran@uib.no journal of applied hermeneutics may 12, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 the process of speech-acting specifies methods for grasping meaning. ten operations. a contribution to hermeneutics1 thorvald gran abstract how does speech-acting theory explain the generation of meaning and meaningful collective action? what place does first person subjective experience have in the theory? what are some of the methodological implications of the theory? the purpose here is to outline the searlean theory of meaning formation and to draw some directions for research into meaning formation and organization from that outline. searle assumes a deep intentionality, a directedness towards the world of all the human capacities. searle asks: how do humans from external inputs from the world and through language produce knowledge of the world and organized projects that implemented change the world? reasoning implies meaning. reasons to act identify conditions of success = a meaningful act. research directions (10) are drawn from elements of the speech act theory: the locutionary process, status assignments and meanings, willfulness, types of speech acts, decision-making, and organization. keywords hermeneutics, speech acts, meaning formation, organization theory normativity and facts finding, interpreting, and understanding the meaning people attach to what they say, what they see and do is a major task in social science. those exercises can be termed hermeneutics. the task here is to investigate how speech-acting theory specifies those exercises. it is a first level gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 2 investigation, in the sense that it searches for the hermeneutic methods from a specification of main elements/concepts and relations between them in the searlean theory of speech-acting. a second level investigation would/should go deeper into the methods of interpretation deemed necessary by each of the elements of the theory. how we generate meanings and meaningful action is contested. one view is that we will never really know because meanings are everywhere, that every investigation has to start from existing meanings among humans and can never really get outside of them. moules, field, mccaffrey, and laing (2014) (quoting from david abram) used the example of a physical object, a bowl. we have to look at it from an angle, from a perspective. we can never sense it fully, see it as a whole. fleming, gaidys, and robb (2003) wrote of gadamer in the same terms: we are in history with values and interests, therefore objectivity is impossible: “according to gadamer (1993), we are all part of history and it is thus not possible to step outside history to look at the past objectively” (fleming et al., 2003, p.115). history is subordinated in our horizons, our perspectives. even our consciousness is in history, therefore our pre-understandings are the structure of what we see and understand. therefore, the method of investigation cannot get beyond co-production of interpretations between researcher and persons investigated = the method of conversation, turning things around together, looking at things from different perspectives. gadamer suggested that all understanding is dependent upon pre-understandings. there is a narrow relation between questions and understanding. however, reflecting on our pre-understanding makes a transcendence of them possible (fleming et al., 2003). searle (1995) agreed that pre-understandings are important – he called them first principles. he agreed that we are set in history and that meanings are all over where humans are. he posited that investigations imply perspectives, chosen angles. investigations imply normativity: what interests me; which questions do i want to address? however, he suggested that nature, including humans as biological creatures, functions without perspectives. normativity is not part of the physical-biological processes. they run their basic course independent of human subjectivity. we can, however, describe and even understand those facts and see their relations. contrary to brute facts of nature, social facts and institutions are constituted on perspectives, on our normativity and willfulness. moules et al. and fleming et al. cited above do not make that distinction. searle suggested that this difference between basic, brute facts and social institutional facts opens for investigations of the brute-social relations and for objective knowledge of how humans normatively generate meanings. dichotomies can be approached differently: for example (1) which side is true? moules et al. and fleming et al. seem to suggest that that perspectives influence seeing. therefore, all knowledge contains subjectively chosen perspectives and thus objective knowledge is, in this sense, excluded. judith butler (2003) assumed that acting is dramatizing conventions and that the idea of freely choosing how to act is an illusion, itself a dramatizing of a convention. we enact conventions. personal freedom is an illusion. charles taylor (1985) struggled with the dichotomy of language as either designation (signaling objects) or expression (articulating stories). he favored expressionism but cannot fully exclude designations. but dichotomies can (2) be approached in their relations. searle was mainly on that track. what is the relation between the subjectivity of gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 3 the mind and the objective world of physics and biology? what is the relation between the production of knowledge and the willful production of projects into the future -or the relation between cognition and volition? what is the relation between unregulated decision-making and institutional power? searle asked how, under which conditions, does human intentionality and language generate word/sentence meanings, agreements and social institutional facts. some of those conditions may be hidden, not experienced, even though they are at work. perspectives and interests are present when seeking knowledge, but perspectives and normativity are not part of, are not present in, the basic physical and biological processes. there is, in other words, a complex natural world without normativity. the human body is part of that world with consciousness, language, and the connected experience of time and freedom of choice. the task is to investigate interactions – how, for example, language produces insight into time, how sensing through processing of sense data can generate knowledge, or how ideas condition the biology of the brain. thus, we can discern two approaches to meaning, to hermeneutics: 1) normative positions or perspectives are inherent in all knowledge; objective knowledge is a false, science legitimating norm and 2) by investigating the relations between basic natural and constructed social facts, from different perspectives, and the conditions for the successful implementation of human intentions, objective knowledge of the meaning people/attach to their actions is possible. the task then is to try – at this first level to specify the searlean speech-act theory and to extract some ideas of how to go about investigating meaning formation and meaningful action. the intention is to take strong findings in the searlean philosophy of speech-acting and society and draw methods for research on meanings and action/organization from those findings. speech-acting, the locutionary process through intentionality to organization the construction of collective intentions through speech-acting is a wide and rich field of investigations (tollefsen, 2002). those investigations raise the question how speech-acting through assigned meaning organizes or constructs organization among people, or how speech-acting constructs social institutional facts (searle, 1995, 2001: tuomela 2013). how does human biology and use of language make collective intentions possible? humans are intentional creatures. through all their senses and capacities they/we are actively engaged in the world. humans can speak from practice and using abstract concepts, giving us time, otherand self-reflection and the possibility of making promises. intentions, contextually developed, drive speaking. words, or physical sound blasts are assigned meanings. the sounds we make are assigned status (searle, 1995). so things in the world can be named and investigated not only practically but systematically and logically. projects into the future – the expression of willfulness – can, through agreements, be constructed and described. we can make promises to each other to engage in projects. in this way speech-acting – sometimes generates a new organization, a new, functional, operative group. the basic element in speech-acting is the locution, a particular way of using words: a word or phrase. the locutionary process has two sides: the illocution the intention of the speaker and the chosen means, and the perlocution how the statement put forward is understood by the recipient of it and responded to. practical knowledge does not require a language. a creature just gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 4 knows, through sensed physical experience what to do in different settings from desires and fears. humans can work without having concepts on what they are doing. when the ability to use abstract concepts about things we experience and think – or language comes around, the ability to investigate reaches new levels and the ability to dream up and formulate – more or less realistic – projects into the future expands human creativity. speaking is acting, either in the sense of coming up with new insights, new knowledge, or in generating collective intentions and organization through agreements and promises or in creating disagreements, separations, and conflicts2. normativity is present where people are alive and acting. interests drive investigations. findings and factual statements are put forward for reasons. they describe things that for some are unknown. the findings can themselves be reasons for acting. when i say it is raining outside, when it actually is raining (intention 1), i might make the factual statement because i think you should bring your umbrella or put on a rain-coat (intention 2). by making the statement, it enlightens (intention 1) and organizes (intention 2). we go out with umbrellas. or, an example at a higher level of organization: if i am your boss, i call you into the office and say: “you are fired,” two things happen: (1) the statement changes the world, organizes, creates a new objective fact: from being an employee you are forcefully moved into the status of unemployed; and (2) it enlightens, it describes – in that moment – a new existing world. the rain statement is factual and it carries or is connected to a normative interest: bring umbrellas. the firing statement is different. it organizes directly, it creates a new fact, and it describes that fact at the same time3. a condition is that the person making the declaration has the authority and power to make it. therefore, declarations are how power is used. or declarations put power to work. so, the first suggested speech-act driven methodological operation in investigating meaning is: (m1) look at meaning as a form of intentionality; find the status people assign to words, sentence content, to persons, things and to action, how, under which conditions a deliberation leads to agreements, a common, a shared meaning. speaking is using concepts semantically and syntactically in a language. words and sentences are assigned meaning to sound blasts. sound h-o-u-s-e: meaning “building where people live” – in english. such conceptual meanings and the proliferation of languages have deep, long histories. searle has suggested that languages, because of their role in organizing societies, are ubiquitous and powerful institutions. languages express the presence of society. the ability to use abstract language is a universal human, biologically based, competence. it is an aspect or capacity of human consciousness. speaking is intentional, in the sense of directedness towards the world. speaking can be seen as a five step circular intentional helix process, meaning that the circles are not closed: (1) the intention to speak; (2) the purpose in speaking; (3) the choice of means, what to say; (4) saying it; and (5) registering the reception – and perhaps activating a similar circular and interactive process with the person spoken to (the locution, the illocution and the perlocution, reiterated). searle suggested that the assignment of meaning to something, driven by intentionality, is assigning a status to it: sound blasts assigned meaning; that a person is a teacher or a ring is a gift are status assignments, or formally as searle (1995) suggested: x counts as y in context c. speaking is an interactive process, between a biologically driven intentionality and a conscious process of choosing what to say, in deliberation, in a setting of multiple institutions. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 5 (m2) ask/investigate how words/sentences are assigned status on both the illocutionary and perlocutionary sides. ask how deliberation affects the status assignments, bringing them together or creating status disagreements and conflicts. intentionality living creatures are thoroughly intentional, all their living aspects, all their senses, being directed at or into the world. intentionality is directedness. any state of a conscious body directed at something beyond itself is an intentional state. such a state has a content set in a psychological mode. a status assignment to sound-blasts, or the meaning of words and sentences, is a form of intentionality. propositional intentional states indicate or contain what will make them successful. they have what searle called conditions of satisfaction (cos). propositions (p) also indicate their relation to the world, whether they primarily are meant to describe the world or to change it. that relation searle called directions of fit (df). examples: p1: it is raining. the cos is that it actually is raining. the df is from the world to the proposition: given it is raining, the problem is to make a proposition that conveys that fact to those being spoken to. this df can be written from w à p.4 p2: we would like to see the labor party win the elections: df from words/the project to the world, to changing the world, or df: from p à w. meaning: a form of intentionality meanings, as status assignments, are produced through history and through deliberation, agreements, and institutions, and through the interplay of knowledge and projects – knowledge and politics and between brute natural and social institutional facts. some intentional states are generated from the ground up, without any external observer engaged in the process. the personal feeling of hunger is an example. searle called it an observer independent state of affairs or status assignment. what i mean when i say i am hungry is different. that meaning is observer dependent: dependent exactly on what i mean with the sentence i am hungry – for example, i would appreciate some food. some statements on intentional states are just metaphorical. as an example, the plant in the window is thirsty. searle (2001) noted that effective intentionality is dependent upon human capacities that allow for realization of the intention. voting by raising your hand depends on you having the biological and physical capacity of raising your hand. so it is across the board. searle called all these capacities for the background of intentionality. intentionality as living directedness is itself part of the background. it is an observer independent capacity. when a house (in english) is a building to live in, the meaning of house is intentionally developed over time in the language; we want house to mean a building to live in. when we consider saying: that is the house of the proust family, we evaluate the cos (1): example: are the people i am speaking to attentive to that statement now? if yes, i can/should make the statement. the cos (2) then is: do the people i am speaking to know the proust family? in other words, is the statement meaningful to them? the meaning of the statement is thus built through two cos evaluations. first (1) should i make the statement and then (2) related to the reception of the statement -or cos2 on cos1. meanings are not static. they are produced. some have a long and quite agreed upon history; others are generated here and now. abstract language and the observer independent capacity of intentionality are the basic conditions, on, and from, which meaning is built through speechgran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 6 acting. meanings are found through the applied cos, or the double cos: (1) the cos for making a statement and (2) the cos of made statement. (m3) investigate meaning through the cos people assign to their statements. investigate meaning through the direction of fit between world and mind. identify where the activity is, in formulating sentences about found world (knowledge), in formulating projects (directed at changing the world) or actually changing the world (organizing/reorganizing). direction of causation searle added a third concept: the direction of causation or dc. the distinction between fit and causation serves the analysis of the relation between brute facts and social/institutional facts, between the natural physical and the social institutional. intentional causation of action is a type of causation; it is a mental causation. it is defined as any causal relation between an intentional state and its cos: examples might be: a) a desire – thirst causes me to drink water. in that case, the intentional state causes its cos, the actual drinking; or b) the possibility of drinking water causes my desire to drink water. in this case, the dc is opposite: cos causes the intentional state. if we look at a desire as a subjective project, then the df is from the project (given) to (changing, adjusting) the world or df: from p à w. if we look at the desire as a fact, as a first person mental state, the desire causes the drinking. the desire is the world, the reality. it causes drinking as a subjective action. dc is from the world – the desire a fact w to action a, or from w à a. the cause is there, but it is often not seen. i feel thirst. i drink. i do not experience what is causing the feeling, the desire. there are things/processes in my body beyond my conscious experience causing the thirst. that makes the search and the drinking of water possible and in a way, necessary. for an intention, a project, to be satisfied it has to have a from p à w df – the p, the desire is there, given you have to find the water. the dc of the same project is in the opposite direction, from w à to action a. the thirst causes the action, the drinking. assigning or using meaning is thus a form of intentionality. meaning serves a purpose. (m4) investigate the cause of intentional states. they are often a necessary condition for the state of mind. they are often not consciously experienced. they are at work in physical and biological micro-processes. intentions when speaking together, deliberating, there might emerge an agreement to act together. the agreement can be termed a prior intention to the actual bodily action or cooperation, while the action, once started, is dependent upon often several adjusted, intentions-in-action. meanings seen as a form intentionality in projects, in willful, future-directed actions, can be seen as a chain of three causes: (1) from deliberations to agreements or prior intentions; (2) from prior intentions to intentions-in-action and (3) from there to bodily movements or – in general: action = intentions-in-action + bodily movements (searle, 2001, p.49). gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 7 actions are willful. you have to dare to act. for that reason there is a tsg from thinking about acting to actually acting, going into the bodily movements or the cooperation. in that gap, you reflect on what to do and you develop a reason for acting a special way and you convince yourself – and others perhaps – that it is a good reason. you can act by means of something or by way of something: turn off the light by flipping the switch (acting by means); vote yes by raising your hand (voting by way of). searle called the first action causal and the voting action constitutive. raising your hand or not constitutes voting (searle, 2001, p.52).statements can thus have regulative or constitutive meanings. (m5) separate prior intentions from intentions in action and see that there often is a rulefree tsg. separate regulative from constitutive statements. the latter, when effective, create social institutional facts. willfulness and rationality imply time-space gaps agreements generate obligations. obligations give reasons for acting. as an example (searle, 2001): wanting a glass of beer is seldom a product of an obligation. wanting a beer is most often a desire. so asking for a beer at a bar is most often a product of a desire. however, you are obliged to pay. that obligation is a desire-independent reason for paying. our membership in institutions – as rule systems generates generally desire-independent reasons for acting. institutions vary on how close their rules are to our desires. if you have a shop making a good profit, that institution is close to your desire for money. the policeman who puts you in jail for taxevasion – is a member of an institution in that situation very far from your desires. the jail pushes more and stronger desire independent reasons for acting on you than did the bill in the “bierstube.” most people are located in a set of institutions. their rules and demands vary and are often hard to compare. think of rules and demands made in families, firms, schools, the military, street gangs, cocktail parties, and doctoral promotions. however, acting demands a choice of which obligations, which institutions to honor in a specific situation. so how do we find out what to do? we make evaluations, develop and compare reasons for different possible and impossible actions. we compare the strength and weaknesses of the reasons. because the institutions cannot be uniformly compared we are, at least for some moments in a situation of genuine freedom. our choice in that time-space gap tsg is not a logical or computational deduction. a chosen reason is then an unregulated leap from open alternatives into the world in the form of a decision or an action. a decision-making rule for example family always first would eliminate the freedom, close the tsg. decision-making on what to do next, in the future has a project to world or word to world df. given the project, we try to adjust or change the world accordingly. knowledge and desires influence the evaluations, but choosing which institution, which obligations to honor, is in principle a desire-independent reason for acting. searle suggested that this capacity for acting on reasons is human rationality (searle, 2001). rationality unfolds in the tsgs between decisions and/or interventions/actions into the world. it is in the rule-free moments of evaluation of different institutional obligations that our freedom of will is active (searle, 2004). that whole process is language dependent, making it possible to reflect in time on what to do in the situation we are in. we have bodily desires that do not demand reasons to be acted on. therefore we do notneed to engage heavily in the meaning of desires. meanings are crucial in language and in the agreements that emerge from speech-acting. relations are constituted on meanings. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 8 (m6) if human rationality is seen as the capacity for reasoned action, and if we see that acting on desires actually does not require reasons, then rationality unfolds in rule-free tsgs evaluating varying desire independent reasons to act in relations to others. we can specify the unfolding of rationality in gaps in a decision-making model: figure 2: a speech-act based model of decision-making. reasoning takes time time gap a gap b gap c intention 1: intention 2: intention 3: intention 4: to make its contents how impl implement decision ement? learning the contribution of this model to research on meanings is especially the concept of the tsg. decision-making takes time and has a period of prior reflection. in that period, the person moves /searches in for a moving but structured space of knowledge, interests, and institutions/rules. her institutions, whether freely chosen or pushed effectively onto her, carry or demand obligations (see for e.g., butler, 2003). but there is a new space – a gap in that time flow without rules, making a free and open reflection on the situation and potential tasks and decisions possible. the gap is such that finally making a decision is a leap into the world, a leap that is beyond deductions. we might say with charles taylor (1985) that the leap, the decision, is a product of a holistic evaluation. it is an expression, an articulation beyond designations. a good example of such speech-acting based decision-making emerges in lie (1985). he investigated the political process in norway between 1945 and 1950 when a struggle about norway’s position in the international contest between the soviet union and the usa unfolded. when lie (1985) is a good example it is because he makes use of detailed reports from the internal meetings of the social democratic labor party on norway’s international position. he demonstrated how a deep interest in socialism and a trust in the soviet union, strengthened by its major contribution to the struggle against nazi germany is confronted in the internal party meetings by new descriptions of soviet oppression of peoples in bordering countries. soviet allied communist parties in western european countries, including in norway, seemed to support the oppression. some labor party members chose exit and joined the soviet communists in norway. others wavered and withdrew into passivity, while still others gradually changed their opinion, and joined into the discourse on how western europe should respond to threatening soviet activity. lie compared the soviet international strategy to the emerging ideas of un solidarity, the establishment of the western union (benelux, germany, france, and italy 1951), the marshall gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 9 aid to europe and the idea of a nato alliance. gradually, through continued meetings in the party and in international meetings of socialist parties, the idea of a western alliance against soviet postwar oppression was consolidated. lie demonstrated the crucial role of the formal and informal meetings where knowledge is gradually forged about the real international and internal practice of the soviet union. gradually norway’s international position – either neutrality or siding with the western democracies is clarified and the western alliance gains support. micro materials from the meetings of the labor party continuously seen in their institutional and popular context in norway and elsewhere, give a deep understanding of the decision-making process, both in the party and, the next time around, in the open parliamentary decision-making. (m7) to understand social and political development, investigate reflections and speechacting in the tsgs between decisions and actions or interventions into the world through (powerful) meetings where people think, investigate and deliberate on politics and the means necessary for alternative routes of action. collective intentions generate groups and common meanings deliberations can lead to agreements. through agreements, people with varying and uncoordinated intentions come together in or under more or less well and commonly defined collective intentions. this might be seen as the trait of all sociality, of all social facts: common, shared intentions among two or more people, formed through speech-acting and dialogue in specific settings. for humans, the social takes on institutional form. institutions may be defined as rules or conceptually defined collective intentions. agreements create cohesion and give groups meaning. examples could be: institutions as rule: driving on the right hand side of the road; a functional institution or organization: a trading firm with the intention of buying and selling food in markets with a profit. without the abstract concepts – like rules, roads and trading firms there would be no common presence of such regulated driving or such trading firms. traffic would perhaps be dominated by the most powerful and trade would occur haphazardly. speechacting with the use of abstract concepts generates recognized collective intentions. speech-acting in this sense organizes, or through repeated similar agreements, creates institutions. speechacting might even be seen as the motor of organizing, or at least as the key technology bringing persons in context sensitive modes into groups either regulating or engaging in new practical activity. (m8) search for and investigate agreements as collective intentions, more or less clearly and commonly expressed. in the case of organizations: see them as prior intentions to action. study implementation through consecutive intentions-in-action. when you are investigating social relations, think beyond the subjective into the materiality of them. when speaking we put forward propositions (p) in a psychological mode (m), for example a friendly or an aggressive mode. the proposition (p) is thus an m function of p: m(p). we can identify modes of speech-acting at the group level: a routine mode, an operative mode, a learning mode, a planning mode, etc. in organization and innovation studies, we can investigate how such modes are set, managed, and changed. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 10 in general, organizations, through different media, carry meanings and socialize (prospective) members into them. but speech-act theory suggests that organizations are no more or less than the projects people assign to them. it is agreements and status assignments that hold organizations together. power and sanctions can bolster them – for a while. knowledge and projects the distinction between knowledge and projects suggests that the two activities are qualitatively different; knowledge production is about the ability to use your senses, to investigate, to do research, to find indications of how that part of the world that interests you is structured, organized or how happenings function – how an organization for example affects the behavior of its members, how a certain amount of rain and air temperature affects movements in the protruding sections of the mountain man in western norway at present (30.10.2014) evaluated as a huge potential rock-slide into the nearby fjord. the knowledge project is closing in on the truth of things of interest – both agreements and mountain movements and keeping subjective interests and emotions of the researchers as far as possible from affecting the measurements and descriptions. the norm is truthfulness. project production, on the other hand, is different. projects often have a starting point or a background in knowledge of things and in desires – like for example the experience of a disaster – but projects, because their core meaning is to change the world, are normative. projects are willful. a project is a choice among alternative routes of action. projects thus have a subjective ontology. before they are realized they only exist in minds and agreements. somebody wants to build a new house or a political party wants to increase its votes in upcoming elections. the project norm is not truthfulness. project norms are engagement, mobilization, willfulness, realism and morals. project implementation is dependent upon operative competence, ability to organize. project competence and knowledge competence are thus interacting but different types of speech-acting. however, project competence is dependent on knowledge and knowledge is dependent on ability to organize relevant and realistic research projects. the meaning of a project is its relation to your interests and values. the meaning of piece of knowledge is its relevance to your projects. in human consciousness, the two processes unfold continuously, the senses engaged in finding where we are at every moment (knowledge) and our fantasy and willfulness engaged continuously in what to do next (projects). the social world is constituted on our perspectives, our norms, values and willfulness. the physical and biological world is not. its ontology is objective in the sense of not being constituted in any way by human subjectivity. some social facts are first person subjective, and in that sense beyond objective knowledge. agreements on the other hand are epistemologically open for objective descriptions. producing knowledge of any kind is no simple matter. in that process perspectives, fantasy, ability to articulate hypotheses, controlled use of methods, knowledge of relevant sources etc. is of importance. meaning is continually produced in the ubiquitous interplay between knowledge and projects, between “where i am” and “where to go next.” gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 11 (m9) separate knowledge production from project production and realization, and study how the two competences are related and interdependent. both brute and social facts are open for objective descriptions. five speech acts with different meanings searle has suggested that there are five types of speech acts (searle, 1979). they affect the production of meaning differently. assertives are typically about the world, both the social and the physical world. they are subservient to truth conditions, that the things asserted actually exist, that they can be registered and described in a meaningful way from the registrations. the df of assertives is from the world to words. directives stimulate and direct actions, a type of wielding power. their meaning is dependent upon their specificity. they are evaluated normatively. the df of directives is from words to world. the condition of their success is that people do what is directed, in effect that the words change the world. the third type is commissives, making promises and commitments. commissives create obligations. they suggest that a certain action will occur in the future. commissives are important for trust. their meaning is dependent upon type of action implied in the obligation. their value is dependent upon their importance in a life situation. the df is like for directives, from words to world, but in a different sense. while directives try to direct the action of the other, commissives that are sincere bind the future action of the person making the commitment. the cos is that the promising person does that which was promised. the fourth type is expressives. they give voice to an emotion. expressives can strengthen or weaken the feeling of community in a group. the meaning of expressives is exactly that function. expressives have no df. they emanate as such from a person to others. the fifth type is of special importance (searle, 2010). declarations have, as mentioned, a double function simultaneously. they change the world and describe it at the same time. their prime cos is that what is declared actually happens. “you are fired” is such a declaration, with cos that the employee accepts. but a secondary cos is that the person making the declaration has the authority to make such declarations. if the employee accepts, that authority (however limited) is in place. if not, the reason can be that the authority is not there or that the power supporting the continued employment of the person overrules the declaration. here, searle was close to judith butler’s thesis that acting is realizing/dramatizing conventions. the power of the firing agent is deeply dependent upon acceptance in society of that power. however, the speech-acting gaps of unregulated reflection suggest that no matter how strong the convention there is a room, a space for freedom to act in deviation from or in contradiction to the convention. the speech act theory thus solves – in embryo a problem butler’s strong conventionalism leaves unsolved: the creation of new institutions and new conventions. how agreements organize through disseminations new agreements occur in often densely institutionalized settings. it is, as butler underscored, interesting how values and power in that setting influence decision-making and personal thoughts and actions. it is also interesting how new agreements spread into the setting or meet gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 12 boundaries there. agreements themselves create boundaries. often they imply – in embryo – hierarchy, an unequal distribution of power between the members of the agreement. knut dahl jacobsen (1964) specified a set of concepts for analyzing how decision-making organizes, within the decision-making group and beyond it. he did not, at the time of writing, have access to the micro theory of speech-acting, but in hindsight we might call his understanding of decision-making as collective speech-acting or group speech-acting. in his study of how the organization of public administration of agriculture changed in norway in the 19th century, he suggested a scheme for the study of how decisions and agreements affect and construct group and extra-group activities. agreements organize directly and through disseminations. table 1: decisions have in-group and extra-group effects within-group: look for the distribution of: commitments, responsibilities, initiatives and information extra-group: look for spread or contraction of: legitimacy, decision acceptance, decision outreach and power source: knut dahl jacobsen 1964 iand we-modes speech-acting and agreements create social facts. the agreements often express a psychological movement of persons or groups from an i-mode to a we-mode of participation. agreements change relations, change our self-understanding. they connect us to others, they can construct an i-mode of participation in a group activity, as an example: i will do my part of painting the house. at a higher level, agreements can generate a we-mode of participation; for example: asked: “what are you doing?” answer: “we are painting the house” (tuomela, 2013). in both cases the house might well be painted, but the we-mode-understanding will imply a different responsibility for the overall task. a second example: “i am an employee of firm a and will do my part of the job for a wage” – an i-mode of participation. or; “our unit/organization is a cooperative; we are all members of the unit engaged in organizing, sustaining and doing the work.” agreements impact groups internally and affect their status externally. agreements most often also exclude, creating borders to the environment. agreements can imply hierarchy and oppression, however without the oppression very often being accepted by the oppressed5. (m10) agreements create new social facts, new institutions – not necessarily different from existing institutions and usually empower members to the agreement. but often agreements generate hierarchy and exclude values, interests and actual and potential participants. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 13 multi-institutional contexts agreements can increase internal differentiation and hierarchic power. we can from these insights see an emergent more complex model of generative speech-acting, a model of how speech-acting generates organization (gran, 2014). speech-acting is intentional, is directed at someone, it functions through status assignments and flows through illocutions and perlocutions back and forth, some speech-acting resulting in agreements. speech-acting at the person to person level (micro) and at the collective level, as decision-making in groups (macro) takes place in institutionalized contexts. the subjectively honored institutions deliver commitments and responsibilities. speech-acting is the unfolding of rationality in the sense of searching for and generating desire-independent reasons for acting. because the setting is multi-institutional there is an element of freedom in time between interventions, generating responsibility, where the person is in search of the best reason for acting in a certain way, honoring one or a selected set of obligations. that freedom unfolds in a certain, more or less limited, tsg that is not ruleregulated. a rule would eliminate the freedom, would collapse rationality as the search for an acceptably reasoned action. the nexus of language capacity, speaking together and making agreements, where the agreements assign the conditions of their satisfaction, their realization can be seen as a motor of meaningful action and organization. at present the most general and powerful institutional context of speech-acting can be – and most often is the nation state. that institution is seldom deducted from and negotiated within common general norms, but created by fiat as a sovereign institution in a delimited territory that can be physically defended by the resources controlled by those who effectively initiate and take on state responsibility. in this way speech-acting theory is developed at two levels: micro and macro and at each level in a setting of actors in their institutional/historical context. table 2: levels and contexts of speech-acting acting in context of level 1 speech-acting interpersonal locutions, illocutions, perlocutions established collective intentions, institutions level 2 decision-making in groups/organizations intentions to act, collective decisions and their implementation established institutions and most generally of nation states demanding sovereignty meaning is assigning status to these actors and processes, to decisions and following actions. meaning is calibrated, the calibration is important for the power – and status of the different parts of the activity. meaning can be researched through the cos, the conditions of realization assigned to the decisions. conclusion: how speech-acting generates meaning and organization speech-acting is a theory of how humans generate meanings, the meanings of what they say, do and see/have in their surroundings. speech-acting theory is by implication for research on gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 14 meaning formation, a contribution to hermeneutics. meanings are historically produced. the searlean approach is to seek out the micro-processes that generate meaning – over time. sociology is related to biology. articulation is not separated absolutely from designation. institutionalized power does in no case completely eliminate subjective freedom. we apply perspectives, but they are not in the physical/biological world, making whole descriptions of objects and processes possible. subjectivity does not exclude objectivity. meaning is created through the use of language, where sounds become concepts when a status is assigned to them, and where persons and things gain identity the same way, through status assignments. statuses are products of spoken-about practices over time. persons become teachers, buildings become parliaments and metal is formed into artefacts. the general mechanism x counts as y in context c is at work. meaning can be approached from the context or from the subjectivity of the person: either, what is a common understanding of the role of a teacher, or how does teacher a in place b conceive of the contents of that label? meanings can be sought in the conditions a person or a group considers as success criteria for a planned practice. articulation (of the project) is important, but its meaning emerges more fully in the conditions defining success. speech-acting, through agreements creates or contradicts social facts. agreements are by definition collective intentions, more or less equally defined by the parties to the agreement. collective intentions constitute the social. the social in that sense has a subjective ontology. the social exists as agreements and disappears when agreements are eroded. in this sense, the social is different from basic processes in the physical and biological nature. they have an objective ontology. they are mostly beyond human constitutive influence. the structure of water and of light waves is beyond or below human creativity. however, agreements materialize through iteration and practice and (some) can be objectively described. so the subjective ontology can be combined with an objective epistemology. but meaning as such can hardly be materialized. meaning must be exposed and sought through speech-acting (widely defined as expressing a state of affairs). reiterated agreements create institutions. institutions can in general be seen as rules, agreements on behavior in varying contexts, and rules as institutions when the agreements reach a certain level of commonality and are respected and copied. organizations can be seen as functional institutions, which are as rule systems developed within a group that has a defined – collective – task. institutions are the materials of a society, of a culture. they are constituted, reproduced, and dismantled through the powerful medium of speech-acting. we can be and are pushed and socialized into institutions and we can enter them willingly. no matter how we enter, they generate – or force upon us obligations. in this sense, they are materials of rationality, materials – obligations we reason on when acting. institutions carry meaning. schools define the task of learning, the military the task of killing and defending national territories, the market the possibility of transacting to gain goods we want and give up goods we are willing to offer etc. institutions liberate and exclude. rules are often seen as constraints on acting. but in a deeper sense, rules generate new ways of interacting, making possible the production of artefacts and relations that expand human livelihoods. think of the huge step forward implied in the creation of schools. the idea emerged that instead of continual down to earth learning in practical activity, for example the father teaching the girl how to paddle a dugout boat as they actually used it, we gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 15 might gather youngsters in a community with a teacher or two, who had practical experience, who could do his/her own investigations into a practice and teach it systematically to the youngsters. the school was a new social institutional fact with a huge teaching advantage compared to the unorganized, individualized learning process. in this sense, the school was a social innovation that expanded and deepened the learning processes globally, and in its wake saw the creation of colleges, universities, and research institutes. in this sense the school was hardly a constraint, even if it did require some discipline from the teachers and pupils. so it is with most institutions. however, most institutions also exclude. private schools might say that only pupils who can pay can join, or only pupils from the community of the owners of the school can become pupils. electing a leadership of the school excludes other persons from that leadership. a firm selects some workers among many more candidates. a nation state might well exclude people from entering and national rules might make certain activity illegal, with dire consequences for those who act illegally. the is (at present december 2014) seem to consider killing people who indicate a religious belonging outside the religious and political bounds of is as quite legitimate. the american government in august 1945 considered it legitimate to drop an atomic bomb on hiroshima to end the second world war. functional institutions then may use terrible forms of hierarchic power to implement their values and goals. in this sense, oppression may be an ingredient of upholding institutions, maybe even a constitutive ingredient. nation states are perhaps those present institutions that most obviously have oppressive power, in the form of military and police, as a constitutive element of their mere existence. in this sense, we might say – in the present stage of nation state organization of politics, violence is lurking everywhere. human language use and the abstract concepts in it generate rationality: the ability of transcending stimulus-response and acting on reasons. in this sense, speech-acting is the motor of meaning formation and of institutions, the basic structures of any society (searle, 2010). endnotes 1 drafts presented for the pgi group, dao, university of bergen and at phd course bi, business university, nydalen, oslo, on invitation from professor tore bakken. thanks for listening, for good comments and suggestions. thanks also for valuable comments from two anonymous evaluators. 2 judith butler 1997 investigated hate speech from a speech-act perspective. her question is “what version of the performative is at work” – in hate speech. she contributed importantly to the discussion when does speaking become acting, and when does that acting become illegal. but butler criticized the idea that hate speakers are autonomous. rather they are enmeshed in power structures. she found support for that view in foucault: “grasp subjection in its material instances as a constitution of subjects.” so change of hate speakers implies change of power structures. this view makes butler unattentive to the searlean investigations of how speech-acting is managed by persons in interactions. it is a negative idealization butler says, to view speechacting as “sovereign action.” 3 searle 2010 suggested that such declarations are the most powerful speech-acts. 4 searle described the same relation as adjusting p to w or p à w or df as downward. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 16 5 in my opinion searle had little time for the analysis of borders, hierarchy, and oppression. see gran (2011). references butler, j. (2003). performative acts and gender constitution: an essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. in p. auslander (ed.), performance: critical concepts in literary and cultural studies, volume 4 (97-110). london, uk: routledge. butler, j. (1997). excitable speech. a politics of the performative. london, uk: routledge. fleming, v., gaidys, u., & robb, y. (2003). hermeneutic research in nursing: developing a gadamerian-based research method. nursing inquiry, 10(2), 113-120. gran, t. (2014). organizational analysis. the generative speech act model. paper to the winir conference, london, uk, september 2014. gran, t. (2011). john searle on the concept of political power, the power of states and warmaking: why states demand a monopoly of the organisation and use of soldiers. journal of institutional economics, 8(1), 71-91. jacobsen, k.d. (1963). teknisk hjelp og politisk struktur: en avgjørelsesteoretisk studie av norsk landbruksforvaltning 1874-1899. oslo, norway: universitetsforlaget. lie, h. (1985). skjebneår 1945 – 1950. oslo, norway: tiden norsk forlag. moules, n.j., field, j.c., mccaffrey, g.p., & laing, c.m. (2014). conducting hermeneutic research: the address of the topic. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 7. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5mw28w9 searle, j.r. (1979). expression and meaning. studies in the theory of speech acts. new york, ny: cambridge university press. searle, j.r. (1995). the construction of social reality. new york, ny: the free press. searle, j.r. (2001). rationality in action. cambridge, ma:the mit press. searle, j.r. (2004). freedom and neurobiology: reflections on free will, language, and political power. new york, ny: columbia university press. searle, j.r. (2010). making the social world: the structure of human civilization. new york, ny: oxford university press. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 17 taylor, c. (1985). human agency and language. philosophical papers 1. new york, ny: cambridge university press. tollefsen, d.p. (2012). collective intentionality and the social sciences. philosophy of the social sciences, 42, 323-355. tuomela, r. (2013). social ontology: collective intentionality and group agents. new york, ny: oxford university press. corre s ponding author: galicia s. blackman email: galicia.blackman@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics july 5, 2016 the author(s) 2016 secrets in the open: an exercise in interpretive writing galicia s. blackman abstract in this paper i present an exemplar of interpretive writing based on my engagement with the movie, my life as a dog. the film is a series of vignettes about ingemar, a young boy, who is processing the events which arise from the difficulties wrought by his mother’s illness. this is not the typical coming of age film where the child becomes an adult through the initiation into life’s painful circumstances. the film ends with the character still in his boyhood. nevertheless, the intermittent voice-over conveys the impression that ingemar is narrating in retrospect, in a build up to his emergence from a state of innocence to awareness, and acceptance of pain and loss. i attended to the principles of hermeneutic practice outlined by several scholars to frame my understanding of what it means to enter the hermeneutic circle to explore the topic which addressed me: secrecy. keywords secrets, hermeneutic circle, childhood, interpretive writing preface this interpretive response to the film, my life as a dog, was a requirement of coursework in a hermeneutic research course i was taking in my graduate studies. i approached the task with some concern over the similarities between hermeneutic research and literary analysis. however, as i proceeded with the activity, i noticed where i was straddling two ways of thinking: the way that i would normally instruct my literature students to respond to art in order to write the literary essay and what i came to recognize as the hermeneutic sensibility. there is an blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 2 interconnectedness between these two ways of thinking but as i often tell my students: poetry, drama, and prose, are types of literature, constructed from the same building blocks but each is distinguishable as a particular art form. coming to hermeneutics as a novice, it is easy to be naïve and say, “it is just about interpretation” but i would argue it is about a kind of interpretation and one needs to be clear about the nature of that interpretation before calling it hermeneutics. i am grateful to dr. nancy moules and dr. graham mccaffrey whose comprehensive course on hermeneutic research helped me understand what it means to come to hermeneutic thinking and writing, and that ultimately, hermeneutics is practice-oriented. the film, my life as a dog, is centred around the twelve-year protagonist ingemar who lives with his mother and older brother. he gets into trouble easily and when his mother gently admonishes him for his quirkiness, he notices that she is ill. the film is crafted through a series of scenes which capture the chronology of the events leading up to ingemar’s unde rstanding that his mother has passed away. that chronologically is interspersed with short clips which function like flashbacks to a period of an idyllic time shared between ingemar and his mother. that recurring flashback with ingemar and his mother, laughing and talking, in a scene evocative of a summer day near a lake, is a contrast to the chronology of the film, where we see the mother deteriorating physically. the flashback also contrasts the increasing distance in the relationship between ingemar and his ailing mother. when the mother is getting ill to the point where she needs rest and she cannot parent well enough, ingemar and his brother are sent to live with relatives for a while and his beloved dog is reportedly sent to a kennel. throughout the film, he and his brother are moved around a bit, though not always together, and that creates a picture of a young boy tossed around, disconnected from his closest family members. ingemar goes to live with his uncle in a village with a mix of peculiar characters. it serves to distract him for a while, but when he returns to live with his mother and brother, the mother is obviously, chronically ill. the absence of his dog also serves to awaken his innocence. however, it is a while before ingemar comes to understand the painful reality. when he does, his uncle and the new relationships he has formed in the village, help him to attain a measure of peace and tranquility. secrets in the open in my caution to avoid succumbing to the inclination to respond to this film in the way that i would typically respond when conducting literary analysis, i tried to avoid the themes and motifs which were likely to evoke that kind of response. it was awkward to view the film and attempt to silence the jargon which most clearly helps me arrive at a deeper understanding. i cou ld not shut off that prejudice. that would have been counterhermeneutic. however, when i am with my niece and nephew (ages nine and eleven), i am not a language teacher. for the period of play with them, i inhabit a twelve-year old sensibility until my adult status is required. so for this task i did not seek to shut off my prejudices. instead i asked, what would my childlike self see? i kept waiting for sickan to reappear because i have a soft spot for creatures of the canine persuasion (a partiality from childhood). gadamer pointed to the paradox of the hermeneutic impulse that gets the inquiry rolling along, that “individual explorations necessarily start from the very limited experiences and fields of blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 3 experiences” (1976, p. 18). my understanding is that hermeneutics, as interpretive inquiry, begins in the address of the familiar. jardine stated that interpretive inquiry is concerned with “the generativity of meaning that comes with the eruption of the new in the midst of the already familiar” (1992, pp. 51-52). when sickan failed to appear and i felt the familiar heartbreak of the loss of a beloved animal, in addition to all the other cha llenges facing ingemar, i started to notice the other instances where information was withheld from him. i began to wonder about the secrets in the film and i began to ponder even further, when does secrecy cease to be deception and when does it take on a poignant or dangerous overtone? as i mentally pulled out the instances of secrecy, i had to pause. i was on the verge of looking for a pattern in the examples and i would likely proceed to a conclusion as i am wont to do for literature. at that rate, i wou ld never enter the hermeneutic circle. however, if hermeneutic inquiry begins in data saturation (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015, p. 83), then i needed to look more closely at the examples of secrecy in the film and i found several. address of the topic i almost abandoned secrets because i thought i would have preferred an easier topic. i wanted to pursue something more familiar, more evocative, such as the rustic environment and the eccentricities of the characters. i was trying not to conduct literary analysis and uncertain that i had the hermeneutic tools at hand, i doubted whether i should follow the trail. however, gadamer cautioned that “avoiding misunderstanding cannot be regarded as the specific task of hermeneutics” (palmer, 2007, p. 87). i am beginning to see what caputo implied about the discomfort that initiates hermeneutic work, the paralysis that compels one to proceed with the topic (moules et al., 2015, p. xii). the topic was not allowing itself to unfold unless i did the work but it was preventing me from seeing anything else. the secrets did not have patterns and i had indecisions about what i construed as secrets in the film. there it was, the topic, in all its discomforting nakedness: what understandings about secrets are evoked from viewing this film? what meanings are confirmed and challenged by my understanding of secrecy? secrets have a peculiar association with childhood and i had deliberately entered a childlike sensibility when viewing the film. i wondered about when do we stop saying “let me tell you a secret” and begin saying, “can i take you into confidence about something” and how we go about distinguishing between lies and secrets. when does the word evoke something pleasurable and when does it veer into taboo terrain? up until this inquiry, secrets had been relegated to the sentiment moules et al. captured with the recognition that “when a term becomes widely assumed and taken for granted, it starts to slip away from us, unnoticed in plain sight like a comfortable pair of shoes” (2015, p. 152). i felt that i did not know enough about secrets to conduct an interpretive analysis of the topic. there was the literary analyst rearing its head. the term is familiar so i was not sure why i had trepidations. who among us has not used the phrase “it’s a secret” with awareness of the associations the phrase evokes? it is sometimes accompanied by the exclamatory “shh” or the imperative to be hushed. secrets are about the unknown, but they are distinguishable from mysteries because somewhere, someone “knows” the secret. some definitions give the term associations with concepts of exclusion, concealment, privacy, and division. blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 4 i looked at book titles and the contexts where the term tends to be used. there were selfhelp books which offered to reveal the secrets to staying healthy or beautiful or young; there were other kinds of selfhelp books about the secrets to human behaviors or success; the whistleblowers who put out secrets that institutions, companies, and governments do not want you to know; the secret “truth” about ancient societies or ways of living different from what we know; secrets of the animal kingdoms; advice books for children about secrets that they should share; notions of secrets in romantic relationships and domestic contexts; secrets in health, employment, or academic situations. (i discovered that i really wanted to know the ancient secrets of the horse’s mind in a way that i had never known that i wanted to.) then there were books on secrets to writing pape rs and dissertations, but none on the secrets to hermeneutic interpretations of film. even caputo declared that he has not been given access to some big capitalized know-it-all “secret” in hermeneutic practice (2000, p. 1). the term secret is seductive a nd suggestive of something profound, special, and classified. attach the word “secret” to anything and it takes on proportions of grandeur. secrets are everywhere. at that point in the inquiry i could not tell if secrets were really in our everyday parlance or the topic was digging into my psyche to the exclusion of everything else. gadamer described what resembles my understanding of the address, “we are possessed by something and precisely by means of it we are opened up for the new, the different, the tr ue” (palmer, 2007, p. 82). entering the hermeneutic circle in moules et al., the hermeneutic circle is characterized as having two important stances: entering the circle, which is accomplished by responding to the call of the topic, and staying within the circle which entails discipline and rigor (2015, p. 122). to enter the circle, i had to phrase the question appropriately, with the hermeneutic nuance, and i had to look at the data, or the events in the film which offered insight about secrecy. what understandings about secrets did the events in this film reveal? i came to understand the rigor required of me as the care which one gives to the topic looking at data as a whole, the topic, and data in part, which is a particular instance (moules et al., 2015, p. 122). i collated the instances of secrecy which were most revelatory about the topic. several occasions in the film had secretive tones: the opening scene; the mother’s medical condition; the bed-wetting scene; the secret spot under the train track where he spends time with his best friend; the story he relates of his father has nuances of secrets concerning his father’s fate; the lingerie magazine which mr. arvidsson hides and pulls ingemar into his secret by asking him to read from it; the footballergirl’s hidden puberty, and sickan, who got this all started for me. the repetition in the voice-over “i should have told her everything while she still had the strength” is framed as a boy mourning the loss of a relationship and wishing that he had shared exotic stories with his mother. however, the ambiguity of “i should have told” is a phrase often associated with or evocative of secrecy. that voice-over phrase which is replayed several times in the film, reinforces the tones of secrecy surrounding the events in ingemar’s life. the opening scene comes across as a revelation of a secret. ingemar’s uncle has difficulty being blunt and escapes from having to tell what needs to be stated directly by declaring that ingemar blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 5 knows already. he apologizes for having been unable to tell ingemar something which he seems forced to acknowledge at that moment. the film then unravels as a series of flashbacks which culminate in that point of the opening revelation. ingemar’s voice-over has the distant tone of the character played throughout the story, avoiding being blunt about the challenges he is facing and displaying coping mechanisms that seem a little odd. by the end of the film, positioning the opening scene becomes clearer. the revelation is about ingemar’s mo ther who has quite likely succumbed to her illness and it occurs right about the time that ingemar accepts that sickan will not be returning either. in my literary analyst mode, i would normally linger on the dramatic irony that the audience knows the mother is terminally ill from the first indication of disease, in the classic trope of juxtaposing childhood innocence and the coming to awareness of the unpleasantries of life which are archetypal initiation points. dramatic irony is a kind of secrecy from t he character, shared between the audience and the narrative structures. a hermeneutic inquiry asks something different of me. what does the secrecy around the mother’s illness suggest about secrecy? people are often secretive about their medical issues, even when these issues are not threatening to others. there is a social consensus that children are shielded from the bare facts of medical knowledge especially if that knowledge can disrupt their innocence. we believe in the importance of keeping children insulated from harsh realities and keeping secrets about medical difficulties in family members is a societal norm. that secrecy is usually also seen in financial matters and family disputes. the assumptions underlying these secrets is the societal consensus that children are not emotionally mature enough to handle tough experiences. perhaps certain events inevitably lean toward secrecy where children are concerned. there are at least two other instances of secrecy where it appears that children are protec ted from suffering. ingemar’s father is a mysterious feature of the film. we do not know exactly where he is and ingemar’s story sounds like a carefully crafted narrative given to him to protect him from the truth. this element of the film led me to consider how secrets are distinguishable from mysteries. can i say definitively that the father’s status is a secret? not quite. it resembles what i associate with secrecy: the unknown, a bizarre story, a failure to appear, but this element seems to linger in mystery. there is no concrete revelation which confirms my suspicion about the secrecy surrounding the father’s status. yet the frequent references to him suggest that his absence is a revelation of some kind. the other event which seems to protect ingemar from suffering is the absence of information about sickan. like ingemar, we are given a story about what will happen to sickan: he will be cared for in a kennel. however, the adults have not been forthcoming about what seems obvious to the audience, the mother is dying. is it possible that sickan’s fate is being kept a secret from ingemar to avoid hurting him further? that led me to consider that our understandings of secrets are often on the cusp of deception. there is no overt revelation about the dog’s fate, much like the status of his father but that does not diminish the element of secrecy. the uncle’s reluctance to respond to ingemar’s request to follow up on the dog is a kind of revelation. the other instances of secrecy had distinctive qualities which made it difficult to see a pattern in secrecy in the film. there, the flux of hermeneutic inquiry was giving me a dose of what it means to suspend my expectation and go where the data led me. the bed-wetting scene and the manner blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 6 in which the boys tried to keep it a secret from the mother shed understanding on the element of secrecy that sometimes it is done to protect the self. others would consider it lying especially when one admits that the outcome of the revelation would mean some distress or discomfort for the keepers of the secret. the secret spot under the train track where ingemar spends time with his best friend is the poignant kind of secret, which is used to build intimacy, strengthen relationships, and there are no obvious risks. the lingerie magazine which mr. arvidsson hides and then he pulls ingemar into his secret asking him to read from it; the footballer-girl’s hidden puberty which pulls ingemar into complicity with her secrecy, also contain those nuances of the nature of secrecy, fostering closeness with others. the recurring voice-over, the image of ingemar in the summer house which looks like a kennel, the framing metaphor of the title, that ingemar is bumped around without being told much by the adult world, all evoke his similarity to being a family pet, a dog, loved and cared for but somewhat distant from the goings-on of the human world. secrecy fosters that distance. some of that distance is ingemar’s doing, because he declares that one ought to have perspective, but much of it is the adult world holding the child at bay. secrets are the adults’ ways of ensuring things do not get too out of control. considering ingemar’s odd little habits (such as his inability to drink from a glass when stressed) and the possibility that his childhood could be traumatized by the truth of what was transpiring, secrets seem like an expedient way of managing the situation. this raises even more questions: how do we use secrets to manage difficult situations and when do secrets become inflammatory in t hose situations? ingemar felt unloved, unwanted by his mother but it was obvious to the audience that she was just too ill to parent lovingly. the secrecy surrounding the gravity of her condition could have had the effect of isolating ingemar. secrets can create distance even when intended to mollify difficult situations. yet even though we “know” that, in some situations, it might even be an instinct to keep secrets to avoid hurting others. in trying to find the right voice or the appropriate language to clearly describe the understanding of the topic generated in the process as is recommended in moules et al. (2015, p. 122), i turned to the personal. last month when my mother “revealed” that she had ungone a medical procedure and the results came back fine, my first reaction was “why didn’t you tell me you were going to do it” and her response was simply that she did not want me to worry. that silenced me because she was right; i would worry because i do not handle medical issues very well. i was grateful for her secrecy and there i saw the instinct to shield others from discomfort as the adults tried to shield ingemar. secrets are by nature multilayered with meaning, never one thing or the other. considering ingemar’s stories and meanings of “secrets” whic h emphasize separation, one can see how secrets in lived experience are capable of divisiveness and effect hurt. conversely, in some of ingemar’s stories they engender comfort and intimacy. within the interpretive process secrets are fodder for the hermeneutic practice. they are about something. there is a phenomenon in the middle of it. they emerge from relationships. people have secrets from others. even though it is one individual holding the secret away from another ind ividual, there is an element of declaration to the self about the secrecy. the language we use to talk about secrets imbues them with inherent preciousness. we “guard” and “keep safe” the secrets, but that blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 7 language can just as easily turn dark with “don’t say a word” and “be quiet” although each instance has its own flavor. secrets have a dialogical element: there is something which is kept, yearning to be shared in conversation with another. secrets can even have a diabolical element when they are used to sever connections instead of building intimacy. when they are perceived as willful deceptions they lose any magic they could have had. when they are used to con and exploit, they become toxic. secrecy can veer into meanings of deception and lying. to be on the side of the unknown can sometimes be a case of protection from an unpleasantry but it can also be seen a dark phenomenon when the unknown and subsequent “reveal” is dangerous or done carelessly. fortunately for the character, ingemar, the relevant revelations which induced deep hurt were buffered by a new life surrounded by gentle caring characters. this inquiry led me to consider the psychology of secrecy. i conducted a search for literature on the topic, perhaps in an impulse to conduct the dialo gue that is necessary when one is within the hermeneutic circle and i was on the verge of proceeding to what looked like a literature review when i encountered bellman’s the paradox of secrecy. then i recognized i was in a potentially dangerous zone of over immersion and i felt the tug of what jardine referred to as “knowing when to stop in the spinning out of implications of meaning” (1992, p. 59). i was finding it difficult to wrap up the understandings. how do i conclude in a way that does not have a strong whiff of literary interpretation? i could go on and on, or i could just stop here and acknowledge the ongoing nature of hermeneutic work. however, i could not leave the understandings lying around like puppies abandoned at a dog pound. moules et al. advised that they should not be “left there to dangle in an exotic display but must be brought back into the world where the topic is located” because deconstruction moves toward reconstruction (2015, p. 132). beyond the circle i cannot look at the concept of secrecy the same way ever again. considering the instances in the film, those i addressed here and those i briefly mentioned, i have come to several understandings of the topic. normally when one declares that one has a secret in possession the ins tinctive response is to persuade the secret-holder to reveal it. we usually want to know something once it has been imbued with the veneer of secrecy. secrecy has the quality of something which ought to be revealed eventually, whether that is done willfully or by happenstance. the unknown tends to be considered as mystery when the revelation has not happened. i was indecisive about whether to declare this understanding about secrecy and the reveal as a “finding” for this inquiry. i considered the researc h described in moules et al. (2015, p. 127) that grief is usually accompanied by the appearance of guilt, and tentatively latched on to this as support for my process. other inquiries will indicate other dimensions to secrecy that i have not considered here, but that is a recurring caveat when conducting hermeneutic research, that when we see one side, there is yet an unconcealed side. blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 8 now, when i hear the word secret used in common parlance, i will wonder about the understanding attached by the user. is it a genuine secret, or is the word used for effect? what would make it genuine? is there something perverse in wanting to know a secret? or is there something anti-social when people are unmoved by the idea of the thrill of secrecy? this film led me to consider that the concept of secrecy when attached to childhood, carries connotations of protection from harsh realities, or the pleasures of having a world without the intrusion of meddling others (adults or other children). indeed, these understandings are also applicable to secrecy and adulthood but secrets take on darker tones in the adult world. this inquiry made me reflect on the concept of gossip and how it hinges on the concept of secrecy. as i found myself going out of the parameters of the film, i came to see why the hermeneutic inquiry is an immersion into the flux of being. understanding is not bound. there is still more to uncover. i thought about secrets in a way i have never had to do before. through the experience of interpreting the film, i am ineluctably altered in my relationship with the concept. in trying to cultivate the hermeneutic sensibility this section of the paper is a bit like a post-script. what has this exercise revealed to me? how is this kind of inquiry different from literar y analysis? these were some of the questions which accompanied me throughout my exercise as i tried to be true to hermeneutic praxis. i have been acutely attentive to the similarities between hermeneutic approaches and literary analysis but i wanted to guard against naiveté and the assumption that my eventual research with people, reading the texts of interviews, can be done like analysis of fictional text. initially i wondered, how i would divorce my literary inclinations from the hermeneutic circle. i found as i read more about the principles of hermeneutic practice that there were pointed differences. this film is not about secrets. secrets inhabit a small part of the narrative arc. they are not an overriding theme or motif. literary analysis would involve coming to a conclusion about the use of secrets as a motif, a statement about what secrets add to the narrative as a whole, and proceed to look at how the major elements of the film use the concept of secrets to strengthen the narrative. i cannot simply convert an expert discussion about dramatic irony into a hermeneutic exemplar. the hermeneutic sensibility requires something different of me. grondin described hermeneutic practice as “a matter of knowing limitations and humility” (2003, p. 25). the practice demands that i ask different kinds of questions. it expects me to attend to the meanings attached to the phenomenon of secrets. indeed, the hermeneutic sensibility requires humility. i had not thought much about the concept of secrets, in this way, until now, even though i have some understanding of the topic. i was reading several texts about hermeneutics as i sought to develop the hermeneutic sensibility for this paper. i wanted to get it “right” immediately. i was irritated with the similarities a nd differences to what i was used to in literary analysis. i was impatient to get past the plurality and write a coherent paper on secrets. i suspended my concern about the paper and turned to the topic. i had to relinquish some control. understandings could not be conjured and concluded neatly in the same way that i would write a film review. understanding is partial, incomplete, still evolving. i ought not to forget that this is a principle of analysis – every time you look at a text, further understandings will emerge. the hermeneutic sensibility requires patience. grondin’s blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 9 almost confessionary tone that he was taken aback by gadamer’s declaration that the universal claim of hermeneutics was to be found in the “inner word” (1994, p. xiv), is a reminder t hat there is much to be discovered for practice and there will always still be more. i am a few months into reading the works of the prominent scholars of hermeneutics. i have been listening to youtube lectures, reading original works, reading critiques of these works, reading simple introductions to the major concepts, all in a view to saying, i know how to defend my choices. it has not felt sufficient yet. nevertheless, i do feel that it is not enough to read condensed versions of the main scholars or reinterpretations of their work. gadamer pointed out that “the claim of hermeneutics seems capable of being met only in the infinity of knowledge, in the thoughtful fusion of the whole of tradition with the present” (1960/2004, p. 337). in light of that i see the importance of attending to tradition and the need for more familiarity with the key thinkers. i cannot justifiably develop the hermeneutic practice without the hermeneutic sensibility which requires a historical consciousness of the scholarship. i know that there are other elements of the hermeneutic sensibility that need some tending but for now i am trusting the learning process, accompanied by caputo’s observation in moules et al. (p. xiii) that “hermeneutics does not shy away from the difficulty of life but summons the courage to deal with life in all its ambiguity” and jardine’s counsel that “we don’t fully know what it is because we don’t yet know what will become of it. and we don’t know this because it is still coming” (1992, p. 57). references bellman, b. (1981). the paradox of secrecy. human studies, 4(1), 1-24. doi:10.1007/bf0212 7445 caputo, j.d. (2000). more radical hermeneutics: on not knowing who we are. bloomington, in: indiana university press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/2004). truth and method (2nd ed.; j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (1976). philosophical hermeneutics. berkeley, ca: university of california press. grondin, j. (1994). introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. new haven, ny: yale university press. grondin, j., & plant, k. (2003). the philosophy of gadamer. montreal, qc, canada: mcgill queen's university press. hallström, l., jönsson, r., brännström, b., berglund, p., isfält, b., glanzelius, a., brömssen, t. v., & lidén, a. (1985/2003). my life as a dog. irvington, ny. blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 10 jardine, d.w. (1992). the fecundity of the individual case: considerations of the pedagogic heart of interpretive work. journal of philosophy of education, 26, 1, 51-61.doi: 10.1111/j.14679752.1992.tb00264.x moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., & field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. palmer, r.e. (ed. & trans.) (2007). the gadamer reader: a bouquet of later writings. evanston, il: northwestern university press. corresponding author: jaime l. caswell, rn, bscn email: jaime.caswell@ ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics october 25, 2016 the author(s) 2016 neonatal transport nursing is an interpretive practice jaime l. caswell, nancy j. moules, & graham mccaffrey abstract in this paper, we offer a personal account of a neonatal transport nurse (trn) and the interpretive nature of the trn’s work. beginning at the start of a shift, the reader encounters the many ways in which the neonatal transport nurse interprets her surroundings, colleagues, patients, and circumstances, lending to how these factors are consciously and subconsciously engaged in the trn’s practice throughout a day’s work. keywords hermeneutics, nursing, interpretive practice, neonatal nurse, transport, nicu a common descriptor of the nursing profession is that it is a balance of art and science, and professionals within the field are guardians of the human experience at varying po ints along the health spectrum. to understand either of these fields demands an enormous amount of knowledge in contrasting areas. a common denominator can be found in interpretation. scientific interpretation is considered concrete, following universal rules, established truths and measured against standards. artistic interpretation is dynamic and holistic, subject to an individual’s lived experience, and freedom of expression. o n its own, scientific interpretation is efficient and effective, but without the artful knowing of a patient, the care provided is incomplete. n urses practice expertly within both arenas using interpretation as their guiding force. one could think that the neonatal transport nurse (trn) would be at a significant disadvantage caswell, moules, & mc caffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 16 2 in developing an interpretive practice beyond the scientific component. how could the nurse come to know a patient, hear their experience when they have none, understand the message beneath non-existent words and actions? don’t babies just eat, sleep, and have their diapers changed? where does interpretation live in that? an easy misconception to hold, perhaps, and one that is put to rest by reviewing the interpretive practice of a trn over the course of a twelve-hour day shift. 0655 it is an unintended advantage to any neonatal nurse’s development of interpretive practice that neonates have immature and fragile immune systems; it requires that every shift begins with a oneminute hand to elbow scrub prior to entering the unit. this ritual, performed shift after shift, becomes a meditative moment, one to reflect on the day to come, to what pat ient might be received into care, and to get a sense of the unit’s activity. the night shift is leaving and departing comments overheard shed light on what lies beyond the main doors. in those sixty seconds, an offering is made to the nurse: space and time to prepare for the patients and the work ahead. when tuned into this offering, the nurse in kind offers back a foundational minute of mindfulness. it is a moment that allows interpretive practice to come to the forefront. 0920 one of the three pagers clipped to the trn’s waistband alarms in a distinct pattern, and immediately communicates the potential of a transport within the catchment area of southern alberta. the transport team, comprised of physicians, registered nurses, and registered respiratory therapists (rrt’s), convene in the transport office to patch into the incoming call. a quick glance out the window to the heavy thundershowers readies the trn to the likely mode of ground transport, knowing that weather is a primary determinant in how quick ly the team will be available to the referral centre. with luck, the neonate on the other end of the phone call is not in too severe of distress, or very far away, as air travel is unlikely in stormy weather. the call is coming from canmore, alberta, a le vel 1 delivery centre about one hour away from the tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit (nic u) at the foothills medical centre in calgary, alberta. the trn knows that the physicians and nurses at this site are not specialists in neonatal care, but have competency at providing immediate resuscitative measures for the newborn. while a comprehensive report is received over the speaker phone, the trn is hearing a sense of urgency in the measured tone of the physician’s voice and an underlying tremble while reviewing the infant’s delivery. a true knot in the umbilical cord has resulted in a severely hypoxic and compromised baby at delivery. beyond the specifics of medical history and the interventions required for the newborn, the trn has interpreted that a diligent physician is very concerned for the newborn, and that the request for immediate assistance is not a light one; the health care providers to this newborn are at the limits of their capabilities. this knowledge drives the decision to gather resour ces quickly and dispatch sooner than the typical allotted departure time. caswell, moules, & mc caffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 16 3 all necessary standard equipment is packed, along with anticipated additional items possibly needed for a newborn with suspected hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (hie). en route to canmore, the calculated particulars of critical newborn care are completed, and an entry plan of care is discussed with the transport rrt partner, knowing the plan will evolve based on what is encountered on arrival. in this preparation, having not yet la ying eyes on the patient, the trn is demonstrating interpretive practice through anticipation. anticipation, arrived at by piecing together bits of information, knowledge and experience into a potential whole, is one spoke on the wheel of interpretive practice. the complementing side of this wheel spoke is flexibility, as the trn knows anticipation does not equate absolute truth. being prepared yet adjustable to work in the moment, not the hypothetical moment, is what will ensure the best care is provided for the criticallyill newborn. 1105 on arrival to the referral site, the trn sees at first look that the physical needs of the baby are being met; a cardio-respiratory monitor displays vital signs within normal limits, the warmer is at a low setting as required for babies with suspected hie, and an iv is in situ infusing an appropriate solution at an appropriate rate. the presumed father looks disheartened and worried standing guard over his flaccid, motionless baby girl, and the mother, lying in a hosp ital bed, is being attended to by her own nurses. an older woman is at her side, likely grandmother to the infant as she shares the same curly tresses with the mother. this immediate gathering of preliminary information in an unfamiliar environment with an unknown patient tells the trn several things: the newborn has been in capable hands with the canmore team, she has a family that is desperately worried for her, and she has been significantly compromised. the danger in these judgements is mistaking them for truths before verifying them. interpretive practice is witnessed in the trn’s ability to use the judgements as an entry point of care, affirming or dismissing them, and then building from them. during the trn’s assessment of the patient, discussion between the two health care teams flow back and forth, each piece of conversation building a more complete picture for both parties. reassurance is given to the canmore team that their skills were effective and appropriate. small pieces of teaching are inte rjected when needed, knowing this is best received in moments of camaraderie rather than in condescension. interpretive practice is implemented in relationship building, as the nurse knows a positive exchange will have impact on how the team is perceived, and could impact other newborns in the future. the trn considers the data collected on maternal and antenatal history and understands it for the basic information it conveys: the mother’s gravida, para status (number of pregnancies, number of live births) is g1 p0, had regular prenatal care, and normal antenatal scans. what this data captures but does not convey is that a young, married couple have been joyously expecting their first child for the past 38 weeks; 38 weeks in which the mother has taken care of herself and her pregnancy, attuned to her baby so much so, that when no movement was felt overnight, she rushed into the local hospital for a check-up. it is interpretive practice that enables the trn to appreciate what lies beyond the data to the human experience. it is in the observations of the caswell, moules, & mc caffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 16 4 people surrounding this baby that the trn has come to this understanding, knowing as well that similar data under different lived experiences will result in completely different families and how care will be best provided for them. through body language, the trn sees that the father needs to be engaged in his baby’s care, and involves him when appropriate. his eyes betray the strength he wants to show when asking why his daughter’s abnormal movements are considered seizures. the subtle, abnormal movements astutely observed by the trn and the quick response to draw up the appropriate medication demonstrates the impact proper interpretation of physical assessment can have on the necessary treatment of a patient. while addressing the seizure activity of the baby and taking in the non-verbal communication of the family, the nurse is preparing for another form of interpretive practice: how to inform the parents of what to expect for their daughter. translating the medical diagnosis, necessary interventions, and what the days ahead may hold, will be different for every patient and family. it is interpretive practice that enables the trn to choose what language, tone, and pace of delivery to impart that information. having stabilised the newborn and readying for departure, the trn prepares both mother and baby for their first hold. interpretive practice is not required to know a mother wants to cradle her newborn, but it reminds the nurse that the emotions of a post-partum, new mother deserve gentle, honest handling. during this first hold, the nurse intuitively steps back, giving space to mother, father, and baby to be a family. experience has proven that this precious, quick moment is more important than any further words. separating the baby from her mother is unwelcomed but necessary, so the baby is safely and quickly transferred into the transport incubator. interpretive practice happens in small moments, unregistered, but real and impactful, nonetheless. the team is on site for a little over an hour; in this time, a criticallyill newborn has been stabilised, teaching needs of the referral site have been addressed, while maintaining a positive working relationship as an ambassador for the tertiary care nic u, and trust has been established with two new parents who are absorbing the shock of their baby born criticallyill. the trn achieves this with deft capability and compassion, illustrating how neonatal transport nursing is an interpretive practice. 1510 on return to the nicu, hand over is completed and the newborn is no longer in the transport team’s care. while reviewing the transport log, the trn reflects on the trip: what was learned from this transport, this particular patient and family that can be carried forward to improve practice? what could have been done differently? what was done well? in this self-reflection, further evolution of interpretive practice is taking place, building off one experience, knowing it will further hone skills and knowledge for transports to come. as the trn looks out the office window to a sunnier sky, the transport pager beeps, and preparation to care for the next baby is already underway. caswell, moules, & mc caffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 16 5 microsoft word gilhamfinal.docx corresponding author: christopher m. gilham email: cmgilham@hotmail.com journal of applied hermeneutics february 9, 2012 the author(s) 2012 the privileges chart in a behaviour class: seeing the power and complexity of dominant traditions and unconcealing trust as basic to pedagogical relationships christopher m. gilham abstract through an anecdote, this interpretive work suggests that a chart on student privileges in a class for students with behavioural challenges led to an understanding of dominant traditions at play and the power such traditions can hold over educators. these complexly intertwined traditions included the efficiency movement, the norm, and market capitalism’s emphasis on personal rights. these traditions set the conditions for an abused and exclusive notion of privileges for particular students. this led the teacher and me to question of who decides student rights and for whom do such rights apply. we were then able to talk about how the teacher came to understand his students through pedagogical relationships built on trust rather than a singular belief in the rights of each student. this paper also attempts to show the above understandings involved an investigative labouring to dialogue with the topic and that such effort is worth-while because we were able to return to or recover some ‘basics’ within pedagogical relationships. keywords behaviour, discourse, interpretation, pedagogy, rights, special education, tradition, trust, all things are full of labour; man cannot utter it: the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing. ecclesiastes 1: 8 (king james version) the anecdote jakob was hurting others regularly. he was a grade 6 student in a designated classroom for students with severe social and emotional disabilities. the school had asked me to come in to help strategize because they felt his behaviours were too severe even for a setting designed to assist such children. soon after receiving the request for support, i met with the principal, assistant principal, resource teacher, and classroom teacher at the school. i arrived early, purposively. classrooms provide their own artifacts of a culture or evidence of how life might be for students who inhabit them, i believe. before everyone was present for the meeting, i walked out of the resource teacher’s office and headed down the hallway… the students are not here at this time as i gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 2 enter the room. it feels large for a class of eight students. several small windows allow just enough light in so the classroom lights can remain off. there is a large carpet, a comfortable reading chair, about ten separated student desks facing a cobra-like head of a smartboard projector and screen at the front of the room. there are bulletin boards on the walls of the classroom. i walk clockwise through the room, scanning the environment quickly. a large light green poster board sits on the fourth wall of my scan. it looks like a chart. i get closer to read the large dark text of the title: ‘loss of privileges’ oh no. i read more… 1) the privilege to eat lunch with peers will be lost for misbehavior. 2) the privilege to have recess will be lost for misbehavior. i am stuck. i feel despair and anger together. there is more on the list. this is enough though. i am captured as i have been captured so many times these past few years. it is not the first time i have seen similar kinds of ominous and universal warnings framed as special favors or advantages for special children. in this moment of being pulled up short and disappointed, a flood of thoughts arise. the privileges chart says to me that children in this room have behaviours which are to be pre-empted against with stern warnings of what may come. because of their exceptional status, they alone are ‘privileged’ for what would be in other cases with other students everyday occurrences like eating lunch with others. i see a structure that drips of exclusionary relations within a school community. i do not know how to reconcile the general term ‘misbehaviour’ with the specific ‘privileges’ of eating lunch with others or going out for recess. i wonder how we justify treating the difference labeled as ‘behavioural challenge or disability’ so universally and unjustly different than the rest of the students in the school? also, i want to know if eating together and playing outside are considered privileges in any official educational documentation in the province. i don’t know how pedagogical relationships can develop between students and teachers when threats like those of the chart are disconnected from the particular lives of complex children and their everyday occurrences. i struggle to hold a calm face. i want to tell the teacher this chart acts as a warning that most likely exacerbates the challenges this classroom is supposed to be positively supporting. over the past few years, charts like this have evoked an overall guiding question in my work in schools: is this what we ought to do about students identified as having severe social and emotional disabilities? i contain the emotional response of the immediate experience. i know it is a moment to be captured in writing. i need to wrestle with it, attempt to articulate it, take the time to reflect on it, open it up and expose it for myself and for others. i immediately decide i will do this. the nod part 1: an opening several days later i met with the school team again. i remember my mind was full of many of the thoughts above racing about trying to come forth clearly. at the same time, i tried to be tactful and to apply the right words at the right time in the right way. i had been thinking about positions i have been reading within gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 3 the field of disability studies in education (baglieri, valle, connor, & gallagher, 2010; ralston & ho, 2010; skrtic, 1995; thomas & loxley, 2007; valle & connor, 2011) and how this field arose in response to the negative pathology of traditional special education that often focuses mainly on the person of disability exclusively. disability studies provides a counterbalance to the deficit-based understanding of disability that permeates education. it is an interdisciplinary field in which disability is studied as a marker of identity–like race, ethnicity, class, gender, and sexual orientation. disability is viewed primarily through a social lens, as a series of historical, cultural, and social responses to human difference... disability studies focuses on social relationships among people and the interpretation of human difference. (valle & connor, 2011, p. xi) recently, i have attempted to be more mindful of the pathological focus dominating special education in alberta. disability studies and hermeneutics have provided me with different ways of approaching my work with educators and students. in this second school meeting, we were once again discussing jakob and how we could best support him in the school. an opportunity arose for me to share my thoughts on the privileges chart. “because i care about this new relationship with you and the work we do, i want to tell you about something i saw in the classroom that really bothered me.” “shoot away. we want you to tell us what you see here.” “i’m not a fan of talk about privileges. i think it’s important to talk to students about their rights and the responsibilities that come with having those rights. if i were a parent of a child in the behaviour class, i would want to know why my child has privileges that probably the rest of the students in the school have as rights. what is it about my child that gives you reason to treat him as without certain given rights all the time?” to my surprise, heads nodded in approval immediately. it was as if i had hit on an idea they felt was just. a new space had been created for us to explore, discuss, and perhaps to come to an understanding. i believed i could now begin to ask the teacher what was at play with the posting of this privileges chart. later, i realized my thoughts about rights needed critical reflection too. privileges (from the latin meaning ‘individual law’) are defined as special rights, favours, advantages, or exemptions to particular individuals or groups (oxford online dictionary, 2012). hence, privileges are part of the rights discourse. in evoking student rights, i initially did not realize their connectedness to privileges. our western exaltation of rights as individual and inalienable can lead to an isolating subjectivism. one is able to hold whatever opinion or position they like without the ability of anyone else being able to offer arguments for or against others opinions (jardine, friesen, & clifford, 2006). this can have pernicious consequences; as a parent i could argue my child must have lunch and recess with others regardless of her actions. certainly, there would be times where it is unwise and unhelpful for some students to be with their peers. evoking children’s inalienable rights could be a barrier to considering what is best for her and the community of students she lives within. this was not what i wanted the school team to believe was my position on the privileges chart. the rights discourse can lead to a distorted and self-enclosed subjectivity devoid of gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 4 any ability to make truth claims (jardine et al., 2006). this self-enclosed state of individuals perpetuates an idea of freedom not capable of being accountable to others. david smith (2011) wrote of the gradual morphing of medieval christendom’s seven deadly sins into “…the easier virtues of contemporary capitalism (self-righteous rage against another in the name of personal rights…” (p.154). therefore, it is virtuous to act in defense of one’s rights even if it acts to push the defender further from his or her community. likewise, in the excess framing of the individual’s rights wise judgment on behalf of a community can be sacrificed. a personal or individual reign of rights is the measure of freedom. smith argued this same glorification of rights works at cultural and national levels. in the united states, this collective belief in inalienable individual rights has created a government that believes it can tell the world how to be free. professional authority also gets lost in the realm of opinion and rights (smith, p. 157). given this understanding of rights, i could more justly ask if the use of privileges in this classroom was best for this community of identified ‘behaviour kids.’ further labouring was needed. within the school board’s regulation 6001 on student discipline (cbe, 2008), principals can remove privileges from students on a short-term basis. however, mention is not made anywhere of examples of privileges nor is it defined in the first section of the document where terms are defined. i could not find any mention of similar privileges in the school act. in alberta education’s current three-part document titled supporting positive behaviour in alberta’s schools (2008), references to privileges are almost universally meant as extra or additional benefits used to proactively create positive relations between students and schools. some examples of privileges are given in these documents which do evince the ‘extra special’ nature of the rights given: “activities or privileges such as playing a game, sitting in a special place in the class, drawing, writing, colouring, going to recess or gym early, having extra computer time” (p. 62) and “tokens may be ‘cashed-in’ for ‘back-up’ reinforcers such as food, objects, activities or special privileges” (p. 65). then i found this: “a formal contract can be used to require a student to either demonstrate positive behaviour or face a negative consequence such as the loss of privileges (e.g., participating in lunchroom programs or extracurricular activities)” (p. 55). intertwined discourses of economic, legal, and behavioural traditions confronts us immediately through ‘formal contracts’ and token systems that can be ‘cashed-in.’ we can see through this current and official alberta education document that the privileges chart did not come to exist ex nihilo. a historically present and guiding mega discourse exemplifies this use of privileges thereby giving authority to their continued use. important questions were now howling at me. how did participating in lunchroom activities like eating lunch with others or going outside for recess become privileges? is it the case that we live in an educational system where doing something different at lunch than eating alone at a desk in a room is a privilege? what systems of student control and efficiency were at work here? what vestiges of an earlier mode of schooling children still runs deep in our modern system? generally, when rights for others are privileges to some we most often think of those who have lost those rights through a violation of the law, like criminals. it would be more natural to find a privileges chart in a jail where inmates have been found guilty of violating laws and therefore have had their rights suspended. for them, privileges are most often earned for more law-like behaviours while in jail. similarly, this classroom artifact appears to work prior to the violation of the law gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 5 by placing these particular students into an assumed prior status of guilt that has been given special dispensation via privilege to engage in what most would see as everyday healthy situations for and among children. in other words, the behaviour students’ behaviours will not be tolerated in the least. there has been an acceleration of control over these students in anticipation of the law-breaking behaviours the students will get into, assumedly. in the context of the education document referenced above, the formal contract was meant to be used when students presented with challenging behaviours. hence, it does not seem mere conjecture to state that students with behavioural issues can be given status akin to prisoners who are guilty with special privileges to be removed at the first violation of the school laws. if the status and chart or formal contract could only prevent such anticipated extremes all would be well; after all, who would want to lose the specially earned status--a status assigned by a pathological discourse of abnormality--of no longer being able to eat with peers or play outside at recess? a colleague in special education consulting would often tell others how he had ‘earned’ over fifty such ‘formal contracts’ in his years at school, all of them working to push him away from school rather than inspire or motivate to keep him in our formal places of learning. the contract and privileges chart speak of a power attempting to control students not understand or converse with them. what is communicated to only these kinds of labeled and constituted students with such tools in a hyper focused seemingly positively appointed way is that if you misbehave we will be quick to take you away from your peers. i suggest the very conditions of play and socializing that some ‘behaviour children’ need most is the very thing we hold above them waiting to be removed. such threatening signs can stranglehold hope for those used to living in schools and homes in often-hopeless ways. this artifact presents without goodwill towards those particular children. the privileges chart demands of us to ask rights and privileges written by whom and for whom? when set out into the educational world, the enactors of such regulations, best practices, and strategies must be interrogated. the rights discourse can be very powerfully held as an exclusion making or community dividing tool and this requires our vigilance. back at the second meeting, the teacher excitedly replied, “yes! i think so too. we had someone from the school board here last year telling us this was the way to do things so i was following that. but i completely agree with you.” it looked as though when he said that a tremendous emotional release occurred. more of the play of this teacher’s life in the classroom was coming forth. i felt an urgency to meet with him so we could explore how and why he followed the advice to post the privileges chart. in that moment of his emotional release, it also appeared as if he had an immediate recognition of the importance of what was said. this was a moment of having caught or re-captured an insight or knowledge or perhaps even wisdom held ready to burst forth like those delicately exciting and intensely memorable moments that happen between students and teachers in their acts of learning together: the rest of the children in the class caught alex's excitement. a space had opened and questions rushed in. just how many ways were there to make five? what if you were not limited to ones and twos? we were in, and the glances between us told the tale. as daniel (grade 4) once said about a similar moment in the classroom, “i can always tell we've hit something because you two [sharon and pat] look at each other in that way. (jardine, friesen, & clifford, 2008, p. 124) gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 6 we looked at each other that way in the meeting. in our nod of excitement, an understanding was brought to the surface again. surprisingly, this surfacing seemed so easily come by. as i laboured over this phenomenon, i began to wonder if perhaps this timely catch of what was thrown happened because life in the classroom for jakob and his peers was not well. life in the classroom was not working out as the teacher and the school administrative team had hoped. i was reminded of heidegger’s (1962) notion of the everydayness of things, like his example of the hammer“we do not ask what a hammer is for rather, we demand in certain moments to have the hammer. the hammer’s function is already understood, taken for granted, effective” (pp. 109 115). as wrathall (2011) noted of heidegger’s work on the concealing and revealing nature of truth, “...the style of being that allows things to show up as having an essence is most invisible when it is most effective, for example, we are captivated by things we are wholly absorbed in our dealing with them. that renders us unable to make ourselves aware of the understanding of being that is shaping our experience of the world” (p. 33). when the hammer breaks, one begins to notice the hammer and that which is hammered differently. intentionality arises to discover more or differently in order to work with that which was being hammered. the privilege chart as ‘hammer’ had broken. with the school team, there was a greater intentionality and openness to seeing possibilities or to seeing anew. maybe this openness had nothing to do with the privileges chart. maybe it was enough to have a strategist with them giving them advice for their time of crisis. for the school team, there was ripeness for possibility and renewal as a result of being pulled up short by the severity of the behaviours jakob displayed, i suggest. the nod came about for us easily. a kinship then emerged, a famil(y) iar sense of having been here before in our lives. i think we recognized from our past experiences as educators that progress in a kind of technical know-how for troubled youth–that know-how evidenced in the artifact–was not attained or achieved as a form of competency or mastery or as an objective and clear method to be applied. students often act beyond the wanting and doing (gadamer, 1975) of our attempts to control and predict their behaviour especially when we attempt to do so through a hyper structure like the privileges chart. perhaps we realized the chart was actually like a raised hammer ready to strike and this was the wrong way to support students. perhaps we knew this about the chart and the timing of this anecdote finally brought it to the open and stated it when the words could be heard by all of us. i was starting to understand the latter may have been at play. this was an unconcealing of the barrier-like, and disempowering play of, traditional discourses. our nods of approval demanded more from me. it was not enough to let my sharing and our collective sigh act as the final word. my interpretation of the chart and the events needed to be shared with the teacher. we needed to do some work within this experience. we needed to labour interpretively to bring this forth well. something had been noticed or nodded to; it was worthwhile to hold onto, pursue, and find ourselves more deeply immersed in it. what i needed to do was begin talking to the teacher about this nod and to explore the play of that artifact in the context of his life with those students in the classroom and school. hence, the nod was a return to conversation, dialogue, and ongoing understanding. we had once again come back to an original difficulty. this difficulty is to suffer through complex work with children in crisis. this whiling away (jardine et al., 2008, p. 223) with the experience–taking the time to gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 7 reflect on it and explore it–and this recognition that there was something important, something worth-while to dwell within, connected me to the topography of the efficiency movement led by frederick winslow taylor (friesen, jardine, & clifford, 2009; jardine et al., 2006, 2008; valle & connor, 2011). the privileges chart shared a similar tone to his important, society changing work less than 100 years ago: every day, year in and year out, each man should ask himself over and over again, two questions,” said taylor in his standard lecture. “first, ‘what is the name of the man i am now working for?’ and having answered this definitely then ‘what does this man want me to do, right now?’ not, ‘what ought i to do in the interests of the company i am working for?’ not, ‘what are the duties of the position i am filling?’ not, ‘what did i agree to do when i came here?’ not, ‘what should i do for my own best interest?’ but plainly and simply, ‘what does this man want me to do?’ (boyle, 2006, cited in friesen et al., 2009, pp. 151-152) clearly the voice of the artifact in the classroom wanted the students to behave well or to put it in the way it was written, to not misbehave or to do what they were told to do without question. this interpretive connection needed further investigation because the teacher also hinted at his discomfort with this way of controlling children. in the past 6 years, i have been in hundreds of classrooms supporting educators. i have been witness to an absorption into that which makes our work efficient, stems the flow of challenge and difficulty and ambiguity in learning. like the privilege chart demands, prior to behaving, a student must be aware that certain behaviours will be punished. therefore, we must make life easier for us all by making sure students do not behave in certain ways regardless of what needs might be communicated for example rest, or food, or time away from school work. there is the curriculum to get through, the lesson to be taught, seats to be sat in, and lines to stand straight within. the chart says, ‘this is what will get them into position for learning.’ yet the howling against such a method grows in numbers. i have seen this change over the years. complex students like these and the crisis educators find themselves in despair at what once captivated us, concealed from us a more basic (jardine et al., 2008) way of being with one another in learning. more and more of the teachers i meet in classrooms understand that children do not need universal laws imposed on them or reward and token systems to shape them. in jardine’s back to the basics (2008) we are provocatively asked to: imagine if treated these things as “the basics” of teaching and learning: relation, ancestry, commitment, participation, interdependence, belonging, desire, conversation, memory, place, topography, tradition, inheritance, experience, identity, difference, renewal, generativity, intergenerationality, discipline, care, strengthening, attention, devotion, transformation, character. (p. xi) as i will attempt to reveal, this teacher has imagined and lived in this kind of a basic way with his students and had to suffer through the power of these traditions held over him. there are also many in education who are attempting to hunt down this recent howling for the marginalized and overly fragmented student population with a renewed vigor for certain knowledge, especially in special education (gallagher, 1998; kauffman & sasso, 2006). some argue that we need to re-impose standards of verifiable, effective and, hence objective, practices if we wish to have special gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 8 education students succeed in schools (cook, landrum, tankersley, & kauffman, 2003; kauffman, crockett, gerber, & landrum, 2007). they argue that if only educators could follow the proper methods we could get things right for students. over the years, i have seen tools like the privileges chart cover up the deeper problems constitutive of special education like the glorification of mental measurement and pathological diagnosis as truths, as a discourse which venerates the normal (dudley-marling & gurn, 2010; foucault, 1977, 1999; skrtic, 1995; thomas & loxley, 2007; valle & connor, 2011). for example, i am constantly witness to teams of school psychologists spending their work time almost exclusively doing social-emotional and cognitive assessments so that school administrators can attach alberta special education coding status to students resulting in increased funding for the school and supports for the students now codified. the very system created to support students has resulted in its own army of expert mental measurers who could be directly supporting students in need but instead must spend their time churning out ‘ab-normal’ codification documents to meet the criteria for coding which in turn provides the primary funding for their employment, as well. it is a vicious cycle of production and consumption based on a notion of difference residing at two extremes of a constructed curve of population. the policy structure of special education in alberta glorifies these measured, expert truths as the truth of children who are not normal (alberta, 2010). the pathological approach reigns in special education. it is not that there is no truth in the psycho-educational pathology of children. the concern is with what this pathology conceals or hides in its dominance. the normal curve fragments communities into a binary of normal and abnormal. the abnormal are then further fragmented into smaller bits of diagnostic labels and categorized streams of cognitive and social–emotional abilities. there is an ever-increasing coding structure (winzer, 2009) ready to frame children in particular kinds of ways. in the attempt to capture freedom as everyone with their own unique and individual, right-given ways, we have created a diversity monster based on a normal curve created and defined in modern historical contexts (danforth, 2009; dudley-marling & gurn; thomas & loxley; valle & connor). with school psychologists, the production line has been removed or cut off from supporting students directly. echoes of the automotive line rush forth. some workers never see the product they co-construct in its fullness, complexity, and wholeness because in their tightly defined tasks those workers can only do what they are told to do. this policy driven dominant approach within the machinery of supporting and educating the ‘special’ or ‘exceptional’ is not working as evidenced by low high school completion rates (alberta, 2009) for severely coded students. i returned to the school two weeks later for yet another meeting. i entered the classroom and the loss of privileges sign was nowhere to be seen. in its place, was a sign telling students which activity centers they could go to when their work was completed. there were other new ‘signs’ about the room too. these signs spoke of kindness and caring and student engagement in learning. the teacher approached as i looked closely at these new signs. i hope you don’t mind me saying this. it warms my heart to see such renewal and hope in your classroom. i’m so glad that loss of privileges sign is gone. he smiled back and replied with enthusiasm, gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 9 i inherited that sign. i took it on because people told me to do so. your thoughts at the last meeting reminded me that there are many things i know to be true about this work that i had forgotten or felt i had to put aside. the nod – part 2: true conversation i sought ethics approval from the school board to interview the classroom teacher. one of my hopes with this writing was to more thoroughly clear the way so the teacher and i could interpret the experience together, to appreciate it more fully in its abundance. the event and this subsequent intentional act of research or explication through dialogue are pedagogic and thus fitting as hermeneutic. a hermeneutic notion of understanding is centered on the dispossession of understanding from its methodical, prepared self-security. it returns inquiry in education to the original, serious, and difficult interpretive play in which we live our lives together with children; it returns inquiry to the need and possibility of true conversation. (jardine, 1992, p. 124) as true conversation, i wanted to explore these questions: 1) what does the experience say to us about what we ought to do for students we have categorized in a particular kind of way? 2) what gets opened up or revealed via a description of the event and a conversation with an educator from within the event? prior to discussing the experience with the teacher, i asked him to read the above writing. i framed the writing as anecdotal, as a piece of short narrative intended to bring forth a particular thought or point clearly (pinar, 1995, pp. 438-439). this anecdote was intended to be an act of clearing the way in order to allow us to make sense of the particular experience, as if to say, ‘we got it and here’s what we think was at play’ (van manen, 1990, p. 204). this act of talking and writing about the experience and its complex connections is, in itself, a part of the interpretive, hermeneutic process. coming to an understanding includes me, the teacher and this writing, and the texts i have read and bring to the conversation. in this way, there is a field of knowledge we are in and explore (friesen et al., 2009). in this exploration, it is our ability to get into some of the thickness of the field, to dig our way around the thickets and needles, to stay together as we struggle towards an understanding, towards a mutual nod of recognition that makes this journey both worthwhile and ongoing. the chart was like a warning sign on a trailhead capable of stopping many in their tracks and turning them back to the comfort of what they had come from. for us, the sign demanded we take the risks inherent within the difficulty of this work. jakob demanded this. students in behaviour classes demand this. it is our responsibility to ask what is just about our work. these images of struggling in a dense and complex field to understand what we are immersed and absorbed in for the purpose of moving about well with one another is why interpretive work matters (jardine et al., 2006). through such a journey, i hoped the way would be further cleared for us to talk about possibilities as a shared hope through a renewed understanding of what we ought to do for students in our care. i hoped for the pedagogical act described as “fielding knowledge” (friesen et al., 2009, p. 156): within the apparently singular anecdote may lay a complex history–a field of knowledge–for us to explore. this singular case is not to be racked up as another example along a line of examples to make a statistically significant signifigilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 10 cance. the richness explored enlivens its ties to a greater topography, a greater field. we continued this conversation through a reading of the anecdote. once the teacher had read the anecdote, he replied quickly: …the privileges and loss of privileges is probably the thing that struck me most as being obviously something that i didn’t want to do in the beginning and it was highly recommended…and my instinct kicked in and said well, why didn’t i trust that, at least part way through last year?...i think it also harkens back to a lot of the things that were suggested to me last year when i began in this position; i think things that i don’t do anymore and i wouldn’t do and go against who i am as a teacher…also when i read this i thought “oh. what about all the good things i’m doing here?” i’m often criticized for being too soft and too sensitive and too ‘bleeding heart’ all the time…it’s been described to me that, “you need to be a police officer in certain cases with certain kids in certain times, not all the time.” the anecdote served its initial purpose, it seemed. the teacher felt the emotional heaviness of recognizing (re-cognition) the privileges chart anew. he had been teaching in ‘regular’ school classrooms for several years before entering this special education classroom. once there, he found that his wisdom gained through experiences had over the years was not supported. at this point, i realized more fully how his initial nod in the second meeting was a nod of recognition and release. the space was now cleared for further explication of what was at play in that classroom for him and the students and he began to share that play in our conversation. also, the anecdote revealed its limitations in what it conceals as a tool. as i visited this classroom more frequently, i realized the teacher does not live with his students in any way reflective or indicative of what the inherited artifact pointed towards. could this have been because i was present? in conversations with several other key people close to the teacher, they all shared that he had a cogenerative, community-building approach with the students in the class. still the inherited notion of the artifact was tied closely to the direction from ‘expert’ and ‘experienced’ others that he be like a police officer from time to time in his work with these students. what was inferred in this professional pressure? i asked him. unfortunately i know, i’m pretty sure it means, ‘you’re wrong and you need to do what i say and you have no choice’ in speaking to a child…i think they are also trying to convey that the child needs to know that you are in charge, you are in control…i would take a very different approach. i shared my burgeoning historical understanding of the dominant discourses i believed were at play. he replied: when you talk about the artifact being 'a taken for granted tradition' i'm reminded of how i incessantly questioned everything that was suggested (from worksheets on anger management to the loss of privileges sign) at the beginning and how much time people spent trying to convince me that working with 'these kids' was different and much of what i needed to do would be counter-intuitive. had i listened to my own intuitive wisdom i wouldn't have had any support because 'those in the know' would have shrugged helplessly, saying i didn't follow the advice given to me so why bother. my ideas of working with these kids were seen as naive and overly opgilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 11 timistic. i was so deep in self-doubt that it took a lot to resurface. although for some teachers the chart may be taken for granted as typical practice, this teacher felt otherwise because of his previous experiences teaching in ‘regular’ classrooms. yet the chart remained posted. he shared a feeling of being unsupported if he did not use the chart and therefore pressured or imposed upon despite his learned experience. doubt then crept in on him. since he began teaching in this class over a year and a half ago, he has often been ill. could the imposition of the chart as an overall approach to working with this fragmented and boxed-in population of psycho-educationally determined abnormality produce sickness in a teacher who does not wish to be this way with his students? not only was it suggested the teacher be more powerful over the children in his care contrary to what he believed he needed to be and do with students, he felt a similar exercise of power surrounded him in his new position. for a time, the teacher felt powerless to trust his own sense of what was just and caring for students. surfacing is an older, deeper controlling power over self and others in education. this truth came to light for us once again as if coming out of the long, deep shadow of a rational, technical age of school efficiency, the behavioural sciences, and a twisted logic within market capitalism that honours individual rights above and beyond community (friesen et al., 2009; jardine et al., 2010; smith, 2011). the power of this shadow in this context is not necessarily an intentional one, bent on ruining lives and subjugating others. in these long and varied travels, we have come to know something of narration sickness, and how a once enthusiastic tale of the ways of schools has become everincreasingly, nauseatingly numbing. we have been intimately involved with hundreds of teachers and students (as i have too) and have witnessed, first hand, an old tale, which was once full of enthusiasm, still holding sway; a tale of fragmentation, breakdown, linearity, and literalism, coupled with regimes of surveillance, management and its requisite standardization of assessment, and all the consequent sicknesses. students have become ill, dull, disinterested in the face of this tale. teachers, too, have become ill. and what is taken to be ‘learning’ has itself fallen pallid and weak, infected with a industrial assembly-line story-line that has trumped its own living ways. perhaps even more insidious is how the (often silent) dominance of this story-line allows for the assignation of blame for such ills on the sufferers themselves. (friesen et al., 2009, p. 149) (italics added) a pivotal leading figure in this movement was frederick winslow taylor, author of the scientific principles of management (1911). an industrialist, turned author and educational consultant for the us government, his work with industry and education on efficiency standards and practices became a cultural benchmark for what ought to be done in society (friesen et al., 2009; pinar, 1995; valle & connor, 2011). taylor was after efficient production at the cost of intelligent, thinking workers. what mattered was the precise and timely application of very specific skills or tasks in order to keep lines of production moving well. compliance was all that was needed. the idea that students should be doing exactly what we ask them to do and that educators should do the same is therefore not new. it is part of a historico-cultural tradition still numbing both students and teachers. i suggest this inheritance in education often exacerbates and amplifies oppositional behaviours in many students. in a recent discussion with gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 12 junior high school staff on the topic of oppositional behaviours, i asked a simple question: “if you were told all day by most of the adults in this building what you were to do and how you were to do it, how would you feel and respond? now imagine that as your overall, totalizing experience in schools or at work.” staff responses more than strongly indicated this was not acceptable. in their responses to the question, some staff seemed oppositional. i pointed this out to an ironic, fading laughter. “so why then,” i continued to ask, “do we think it is ok to do this to students, especially those we know are sensitive to this kind of control and telling?” unsaid was the answer i often run into, head-on, in schools: “because they need to respect our authority.” so it is that we stop at such statements, equivalent in every way to phrases like, “it is what it is”, and “this is the real world here.” here we have the taken for granted as simply the way things are. (friesen et al., 2009) in the face of such ominous dulling of the life and choices of students and educators, is it surprising to find behaviour classes filled with students who despise schools and teachers who no longer want to teach in them? when i met with the teacher and shared this writing, i told him i was worried about opening up a connection between his sickness and this historically situated ‘narrative sickness.’ he replied, no. this is ok. you would be right to bring this out in the writing like you have. this is true. it is true of me and the students. actually, thank you for this. since we began this conversation i’ve felt much better. when i first started i walked in here fresh and did not know what i was entering into so i sought help. i read. i stayed up many nights doing my own research thinking it through, talking it through with my sister and friends, thinking, ‘what could this mean?’ because i’m sort of a big picture person, i need to know what’s going on, where i need to go, what it all means…i had no training so from those people who had been in this area much longer than me giving me advice. the loss of privileges chart almost seemed like a structure. it almost seemed like something i was meant to have other things flow from and that was even explained to me before many other things i believe to be important to be thinking and understanding and doing. i felt like i had been patted on the head and told, “don’t worry dear. this is all you need to do. these kids aren’t going to make a lot progress. don’t worry about it.” that was said to me in a meeting last year and i just felt literally crazy, i felt actually crazy. i don’t even know what, this was no longer a teaching job… and people could say as much as they wanted to, “stop thinking about it” but i don’t think that was enough to sit back and think, “ah well. i’ll just sit back and deal with that tomorrow.” history tells the story of a long-standing tradition of viewing students like those in this teacher’s classroom in terms often synonymous with ‘badness’ and disrepute; vagrants, delinquents, waifs and strays, ragged urchins, guttersnipes, blackguards, reprobates, street arabs, incorrigibles, for examples (winzer, 2009). these were educational terms used to describe what we now label children and youth as having ‘social and emotional disabilities.’ the behavioural sciences are designed to intentionally prevent or remedy that which is out of the norm and in the subject: the abnormal or ‘dis’-abled. the privileges chart’s attempt to forewarn ‘behaviour students’ of what may come given their non-compliance is a tool of efficiency and standardization, meant for the classroom so that “…nothing happens that is not anticipated and prescribed (or gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 13 forewarned) in advance. no surprise endings.” (friesen et al., 2009, p. 154) (italicized comments are mine). if the regular classroom cannot do this well, then the unique classroom for behaviours will stress this work and make compliance a pre-requisite for returning to the normal. then, the hidden curriculum (pinar, 1995) of efficiency in regular classes becomes the given curriculum which has at its aim the normalization of students for their possible reintegration to the mainstream. as for the program of studies curriculum, the teacher shared that he was told to give the students worksheets and not expect much from students. the worksheets are also artifacts pointing to the efficiency movement embedded within the program of studies and in action within our classrooms (friesen et al., 2009; jardine et al., 2008). the assembly line metaphor is alive here. in the behaviour class, we could say we have a separate assembly line that is a fragment from the main line. this secondary line is intended to repair or fix that which is broken and thus fragmented so that it can be returned to the main line. after all, the stated goal of most behaviour programs is to reintegrate students back into ‘regular’ programming. this historically situated efficiency movement within schools can only return students to the main line of production and this will necessarily spit back out that which it produced in the first place unless a certain docility favouring the normal occurs. behaviour classes have also become places where at once we can comfortably say we educate ‘special’ students in community schools while those students are visibly divided from other students in their unique classes until such a time as they behave like those ‘normal’ students in the ‘regular’ school population. this process and conceptualization of students is deeply entrenched in the very common educational term ‘integration’ (winzer, 2009). this is an industrial version of schooling and it has been with us for over 100 years. over these past few years, as i have found my way around and within the topography of special education in schools it seems that once students enter these unique programs and their normalizing curriculum--once they leave the main line of student learning and production--the school community often detaches itself from the students. i have been witness to repeated conversations with educators in schools who claim these students ‘belong’ to the teacher of the behaviour program and not them. such empirical incidences demand us reconsider what it means when we say “we” and “our” students are part of school communities. are these healthy communities for all or convenient for most? hints of a resurfaced understanding, anew …there’s an interplay between the student, the teacher, all the personalities and that everybody needs to approach things with curiosity…there needs to be an amount of curiosity before there’s a passing down of that understanding and knowledge …so for me part of that year was trying to understand and so when i was trying to get a grip on it, i started to strip away all the things i knew to be wrong and i started to trust that the kids and i could figure it out. nothing i did with the class after that…after a certain point in the year last year, ever solely came from me...we made decisions together. so for me that was a moment, that was a turning point. that came about near the end of last year. after that, i didn’t think about the privileges chart. it just hung there. (teacher) despite these dominant historical traditions interwoven within education and special education, above and beyond this wantgilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 14 ing and doing of a structure which attempts to reproduce itself through its advocates, that which happens in the everyday interactions between these children and this teacher circumvents this very edifice. beyond structure, power, method, and the truths of how best to ‘manage’ kids, is what the teacher describes as his ‘intuition’ for a more humane way of being together. this intuition seems to be guided by a trust in himself and the students as well as a curiosity in and for the work of educating complex youth. he has learned this over the years as a teacher. experience in classrooms with students has helped cultivate wisdom in him. there is an awareness that no singular method, at least one centered on a notion of a dominating power over the children whose development is claimed to be challenged or special or exceptional, will do. such attempts at framing particular kinds of students as needing “policing” or using negatively driven, universal and tactless threats under the guise of privileged status will not do given his experiences with children already had. together, the teacher and i uncovered features of dominating ways of seeing and being with troubled students that we agree are not just ways of being with other human beings, especially children. we engaged in important interpretive work. this work allowed us the space or clearing to begin to speak of a deeper, richer, healthier wisdom gained and cultivated through our journeys with students. this wisdom spoke of goodwill, trust, and curiosity between an educator and his students. these re-emerged ways of being are ‘basics’ (jardine et al., 2008) worth cultivating. another moment of understanding arises within this: it is not that we recognized violations of students’ rights. we understood once again that being well with one another involves trust. trust is a basic to get back to in our work with students and one another. trust is required and is often laboured towards in healthy pedagogical relationships. without trust we are not able to dialogue or converse towards new understanding. with trust, we understand that we do have truthful wisdoms to share with one another. our professional, personal, and communal authority is restored with trust. the privileges chart speaks of mistrust--a pedagogical violence--present in our thinking about students with behavioural challenges. however, we can be well when there is unity between us (smith, 2011, p. 10). we might labour to get back to such basics. when we can do this in the context of an educational system striving for inclusion or for something more humane than the current codification of students and all that entails, then the question of what we ought to do for troubled students begins to be addressed justly, i propose. after much effort on all our parts to help jakob, he was beyond us at that time and he needed supports we could not provide. this too has been part of the suffering and understanding of our work. acknowledgements the author wishes to acknowledge drs. jim field, david jardine, and james paul for their intellectual contribution to this paper and reviews of earlier drafts of it. bio christopher m. gilham is a phd student in interpetive studies, graduate division of educational research in the faculty of education at the university of calgary. references alberta education. (2009). high school completion longitudinal study highlights. edmonton, ab, canada: author. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 15 alberta education. (2010). by special education code. retrieved from http:// education.alberta.ca/admin/special/stats/bycode.asp x alberta education. (2008). supporting positive behaviour in alberta schools. edmonton, ab, canada: author. baglieri, s., valle, j., connor, d., & gallagher, d. (2010). disability studies in education: the need for a plurality of perspectives on disability. remedial and special education, 32(4), 267-278. calgary board of education. (2008). student discipline, 6001. retrieved from http:// www. cbe.ab.ca/ policies/adminregs.asp cook, b., landrum, t., tankersley, m., & kauffman, j. (2003). bringing research to bear on practice: effecting evidence-based instruction for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. education & treatment of children, 26(4), 345-362. danforth, s. (2009). the incomplete child: an intellectual history of learning disabilities. new york, ny: peter lang. dudley-marling, c., & gurn, a. (2010). the myth of the normal curve. new york, ny: peter lang. foucault, m. (1977). discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. new york, ny: vintage books. foucault, m. (1999). abnormal: lectures at the college de france 1974 1975. new york, ny: pan books. friesen, s., jardine, d. w., & smith, d. g. (2009). on field(ing) knowledge. in s. goodchild, & b. sriraman, (eds.), relatively and philosophically earnest: festschrift in honor of paul ernest's 65th birthday (pp. 147-172). charlotte, nc: information age publishing. gadamer, h.-g. (1975). truth and method (j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). london: continuum. (original work published 1960). gallagher, d. (1998). the scientific knowledge base of special education: do we know what we think we know? exceptional children, 64(4), 493-502. heidegger, m. (1962). being and time. new york, ny: harper and row. jardine, d. (1992). reflections on education, hermeneutics, and ambiguity: hermeneutics as a restoring of life to its original difficulty. in w. pinar, & w. reynolds, (eds.), understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text (pp. 116-127). new york, ny: teachers college. jardine, d., friesen, s., & clifford, p. (2006). curriculum in abundance. new jersey, ny: lawrence erlbaum. jardine, d., friesen, s., & clifford, p. (2008). back to the basics of teaching and learning: thinking the world together. new york, ny: routledge. jardine, d., naqvi, r., jardine, e., & zaidi, a. (2010). “a zone of deep shadow”: pedagogical and familial reflections on “the clash of civilizations”. interchange, 41(3), 209-232. kauffman, j. m., crockett, j. b., gerber, m. m., & landrum, t. j. (2007). achieving the radical reform of special education : essays in honor of james m. kauffman. new york, ny: lawrence erlbaum associates. kauffman, j. m., & sasso, g. m. (2006). toward ending cultural and cognitive relativism gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 16 in special education. exceptionality, 14(2), 65-90. pinar, w. (1995). understanding curriculum : an introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. new york, ny: peter lang. oxford dictionaries online (2012). retrieved from http:// oxforddictionaries.com/ definition/ privilege ralston, d. c., & ho, j. (2010). philosophical reflections on disability. new york, ny: springer. skrtic, t. (1995). disability and democracy: reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity: new york, ny: teachers college press. smith, d. g. (2011). can wisdom trump the market as a basis for eeducation. in d. stanley& k. young (eds.), contemporary studies in canadian curriculum (pp. 153-185). calgary, ab, canada: detselig enterprises. taylor, f. w. (1911). the principles of scientific management. new york, ny: harper & brothers. thomas, g., & loxley, a. (2007). deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion: berkshire, england: open university press. valle, j. w., & connor, d. j. (2011). rethinking disability : a disability studies approach to inclusive practices. new york, ny: mcgraw-hill. van manen, m. (1990). researching lived experience : human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. albany, ny: state university of new york press. winzer, m. a. (2009). from integration to inclusion: a history of special education in the 20th century. washington, dc: gallaudet university press. wrathall, m. a. (2011). heidegger and unconcealment: new york, ny: cambridge university press. corresponding author: giuliana harvey email: giuliana.harvey@ ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics august 17, 2016 the author(s) 2016 intensive care unit nursing: an interpretable and hermeneutic practice giuliana harvey, dianne m. tapp & nancy j. moules abstract intensive care unit nursing is an interpretive practice. hermeneutics, as an interpretive philosophy, is an ideal approach to make meaning of the ambiguities that exist in t his intensive practice setting. this paper uses the underpinnings from gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics to explore the idea that icu nursing is an interpretive practice. keywords hans-georg gadamer, philosophical hermeneutics, intensive care unit nursing nursing is one of the fine arts: i had almost said, the finest of fine arts. florence nightingale (1820-1910) the art of intensive care unit (icu) nursing refers to a professional discipline that skillfully gathers knowledge, interprets particulars, and then intervenes accordingly (benner, hooperkyriakidis, & stannard, 1999; carper, 1978). the adult icu attends to the acutely ill who require focused monitoring. since the birth of the first ic u in the 1950s, the technological advances and unique patient population make nursing work in this setting distinct (hay & oken, 1972; strauss, 1968). the craft of icu nursing lies with confronting the unpredictable human realities of suffering, loss, healing, and the possibility of bearing witness to the unexplainable (benner et al., 1999). the ongoing interpretation of each sound, smell, sight, and to uch is intrinsic to the care that icu nurses provide to patients and their families. as an icu registered nurse and current doctoral student, i plan to conduct a research study that harvey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 14 2 attends to the following question: how might we understand the meanings of work-related critical incident stress for rns working with adults in the icu setting? hans-georg gadamer’s (1900-2002) philosophical hermeneutics will be used to guide the exploration of this research question. hermeneutics, the art of understanding, is an interpretive and practical philosophy (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015) that recognizes all human experiences, such as those encountered by nurses in the icu, are rich and complex (holroyd, 2007; k inese lla, 2006). in hermeneutics “art is a concept, or rather an experience of truth” (grondin, 2003, p. 31). in this paper, i use underpinnings from gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics to explore the idea that icu nursing is an interpretative practice. therefore, hermeneutics, as an interpretive philosophy, is an ideal approach to make meaning of ambiguities that exist in this intensive practice setting. as i write this paper, i recognize that understanding is related to interpretation (gadamer, 1960/2013). icu nursing is an interpretive practice. i have spent a significant amount of time considering this claim. to explore this idea i returned to the tradition of icu nursing by re-reading several of my old journal entries that had been written 10 years ago. as an ic u nurse, i would frequently take time to reflect and write about experiences that were mysteries, difficult to discern, and often morally distressing. mysteries can be understood; they reveal the incompleteness of meaning and that there is always more to be understood (davey, 2006). as i vividly read and recalled the details within each journal entry, i paused at various points that offered insight and perspective. one of the insights that became blatantly obvious was that numerous examples spoke to my interpretive way of being in clinical practice, particularly during situations that were ambiguous and difficult to discern. hermeneutics, like icu nursing, attempts to grasp and bring to light that which is fragmented and hidden (geanellos, 1998). a context is required to elaborate on the idea that hermeneutics is consistently at play within ic u nursing and thus, i will share a personal experience from one of my journal entries. “all experiences, in the hermeneutic sense, are learning experiences. our experiences serve to revise the way in which we understand our past and anticipate our future” (holroyd, 2007, p. 9). my journal entry: interpretation at play september 24, 2006. i received day shift report from jane (pseudonym) who took care of “jack” (pseudonym) and his family. jack, 56-years of age, was admitted to the icu after having fallen from his tractor as a result of a sudden and unexplained cardiac arrest. upon admission to the icu, jack was diagnosed with an anoxic head injury, several fractured ribs, bilateral pneumothoraxes, and an abdominal injury that required surgical intervention. jack had the abdominal surgery approximately six hours prior to my arrival and he remained intubated and mechanically ventilated. immediately after i received report i began my methodical and typical routine that involved: reviewing the alarm settings, zeroing the arterial and central venous pressure lines, examining the patency, drip rate, and calculations for each intravenous drip, conducting a thorough head-to-toe assessment, and attending to family. jack’s initial vital signs were within a targeted range and the rest of his assessment was unremarkable given the nature of his injuries. immediately after my initial assessment, i left jack’s bedside for 5 minutes to prepare his 2100 medications. upon my return, i heard the monitor alarms and noted a 5 mm hg drop in his systolic blood pressure (bp) that was now 80/56, and his heart rate increased harvey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 14 3 to 110 beats per minute (bpm) from 90 bpm. i immediately looked at his urine output, skin color, and adjusted his arterial catheter to ensure patency and accuracy of the bp. each of these objective assessment findings remained unremarkable. my initial concern was the possibility of internal abdominal bleeding, however, i could not rule out the possibilities of an undetected brain hemorrhage or a second cardiac event. despite the lack of evidence to support these possibilities, i suddenly became like a detective investigating a mystery and eager to uncover the truth. i began to increase the frequency of jack’s head-to-toe assessments to every 30 minutes rather than every 4 hours as initially ordered by the icu physician. my “gut instinct” told me “something” unusual was going on with jack’s physical status. within 10 minutes, i heard the monitor alarms for a second time and again noticed jacks systolic bp dropped by another 5 mm hg (75/34 mm hg) and his heart rate increased to 125 bpm . this time my assessment findings revealed: his abdomen was more distended, the urine output dropped to 10 mls/hour, and i was convinced that there was active bleeding in his abdominal cavity. i made the decision to collect blood from his arterial line so i could review his complete blood count, specifically his hemoglobin and hematocrit level. once the blood work results had returned from the lab, i informed the icu physician of the information. the physician ordered additional diagnostics that confirmed my initial suspicion, jack was experiencing an acute internal abdominal hemorrhage. within 30 minutes, jack returned to the operating room to have a general surgeon repair his abdominal bleeding. interpretation as a daily practice for icu nurses “hermeneutics begins with the premise that the world is interpretable” (moules, 2002, p. 4), and thus the day-to-day often taken for granted practices of icu nursing are also interpretable. the word hermeneutics means to interpret (oxford canadian dictionary, 2006) and is derived from the greek god hermes, a mischievous and cunning character who delivered messages of the gods to mortals (moules et al., 2015). his messages were often playful and obtuse, “enticing interpretation” (moules et al., 2015, p. 2). the etymological source of the word “interpret” originated in the late 14t h century and refers to the action of explaining the meaning of something (etymonline, 2016). the act of interpretation takes place through engagement and participation, by being in the world (davey, 2006). heidegger (1889-1976) used the term dasein or “being there” to emphasize that, by being in the world, one is always interpreting (annells, 1996; grondin, 2003). as an icu nurse by “being” engaged in the world of critical care, i was unknowingly making meaning of each patient care experience. there was a dialectical approach evident in my interpretation of jack’s situation. i consistently moved between the parts and whole of the experience to make meaning of his rapidly changing status. the dynamic and iterative process parallels the hermeneutic circle, a metaphor for conceptualizing understanding (debesay, naden, & slettebo, 2008; moules et al., 2015). the hermeneutic circle refers to the ontological structure for understanding (grondin, 2003; walsh, 1996). “the circle, then, is not formal in nature. it is neither subjective nor objective, but describes understanding as the interplay of the movement that takes place in language” (gadamer, 1960/2013, p. 305). for example, the changes in jack’s vital signs were not interpreted as simple numerical data, rather were explored through a historical and contextual harvey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 14 4 lens. according to gadamer (1960/2013), “understanding is, essentially, a historically-effected event” (p. 310). this lens was evident in my use of past trends and attention to the existing overall clinical picture, to make meaning of jack’s assessment findings. the changes in jack’s blood pressure and heart rate were understood relative to the color of his skin, the amount of urine output, and his central venous pressure. making meaning of jack’s changing status is an example of hermeneutic understanding. hermeneutic understanding complements scientific and diagnostic reasoning to make meaning, recognizing that science does not dominate the understanding and is only one component of the larger picture. combined with “scientific and technical knowledge there exists another body of knowledge that is not the result of proof and demonstration but is laid down by tradition, received wisdom, and practical experience” (davies, 2006, p. 40). hermeneutic understanding takes place by examining whole and parts, attending to history and context, in order to make sense of particulars and intervene based on the implications of that meaning (moules, mccaffrey, morck, & jardine, 2011). by re-reading my past journal entries, i have come to realize that hermeneutic understanding has always been inherent in my nursing practice. interpretation as a ritual for icu nurses hermeneutics seeks to question what is typically taken for granted (moules et al., 2015). i have often thought about the routine day-to-day practices as an ic u nurse that i considered habitual and conducted unthinkingly. for example, the beginning of each patient care experience consisted of a thorough and methodical assessment. my routine would begin with an evaluation of the patient’s physical and psychological status, as well as a review of the monitor alarms and the technological devices that were used for treatment, such as the ventilator. by revisiting my experience with jack, i began to wonder, is there meaning behind the rituals that we often take for granted? max van manen (2002) wrote about the importance of considering the meaning behind the ritualized experiences. “and yet, in each ritual there may exist traces of meaning that belong to the original phenomenon that gave rise to the experience” (van manen, 2002, p. 9). in an algorithmic manner, i completed my initial assessment of jack; this routine component of my clinical practice was significant. it offered me more than just a baseline assessment; it revealed what was familiar, foreign, common, and strange. my ritualized experience created a space for me to enter and remain in the hermeneutic circle for ongoing interpretation of the particulars. it was this ritual that presented me with clues to jack’s emerging mystery (the acute abdominal hemorrhage) as well as the questions and dialogue that accompanied. the dichotomy of familiarity and strange ness is at play in hermeneutic work (gadamer, 1960/2013). the understanding that emerges through each ritualized experience within the practice of icu nursing is interpretive and thus hermeneutic. interpretation in the form of practical wisdom patricia benner (1999) used the term “clinical forethought” to describe a nurse’s judgment and wisdom that are typically unexplainable, yet are pervasive in the logic of clinical practice (p. 64). while caring for jack, i recalled experiencing a “gut instinct” that was inarticulate; it was an intuitive sense that functioned like an alarm bell alerting me to “something.” i was unable to discern that “something,” but recognized there was value in attending to this instinct. knowing “how to distinguish… lies the true art” (gadamer, 1996, p. 19). intuition or “this experienced harvey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 14 5 based wisdom, refers to a knowing without necessarily having specific rationale” (benner et al., 1999, p. 64). nurses in the icu use clinical wisdom to interpret salient particulars and respond to possibilities in a timely manner (benner et al., 1999). engaging in clinical forethought requires judgment and an anticipation of potential clinical events using intuitive thinking (benner et al., 1999). i anticipated further diagnostics would be ordered by the physician thus, i collected blood from jack’s arterial line to obtain a complete blood count. the results from the blood work provided me with another piece to the mysterious puzzle, enhancing my insight into jack’s deteriorating status. i believe clinical judgment is inherently interpretive (e.g., hermeneutic), as it integrates various types of knowledge for new understandings to emerge. c linical judgment requires knowledge which is “abstract, generalizable, and applicable in many situations,” including intuition derived from practice and experience as one grasps clinical situations (tanner, 2006, p. 205). hermeneutics is what aristotle referred to as practical wisdom (phronesis) that is translated as practical knowledge and moral knowledge (grondin, 2003; moules et al., 2015). the term phronesis was used by aristotle to distinguish between contextualized and objective knowledge (moules et al., 2015). this is “a form of knowledge arising from experience that undergirds hermeneutic phenomenology” (moules et al., 2015, p. 24). practical knowledge demands judgment (moules et al., 2015) where “the knower is not standing over against a situation that he merely observes; he is directly confronted with what he sees” (gadamer, 1960/2013, p. 324). the work of phronesis penetrates through icu nursing and hermeneutic philosophy, it is a form of knowledge that emphasizes, “experiential understanding of life as it is lived in everyday practices” (moules, field, mccaffrey, & laing, 2014, p. 6). conclusion the art of ic u nursing is inherent in a discipline that engages in the event of interpretation, a process of ongoing discovery. making meaning involves “attention to the question of what it means to know and what kinds of knowledge are held to be of most value in the discipline of nursing” (carper, 1978, p. 13). the day-to-day work of nurses is “deeply interpretive” and “hermeneutic in character” (moules et al., 2011, p. 2). like hermeneutic understanding, nurses use various modes of knowledge to make meaning. re-reading my journals has offered me insight into the present and a glance at the future. when our past and present collide, we are invited to pause and take note. as an icu nurse, i am always knowingly or unknowingly interpreting using historical, e xisting traditions, and context to guide clinical possibilities. the practice of hermeneutics “ventures into the contextual world” encouraging us to to know differently (moules et al., 2015, p. 3). icu nursing is a “deeply interpretive discipline wherein the work of something like hermeneutics is already at work” (moules et al., 2011, p. 2). revisiting my past has revealed to me what was once concealed, that i am always already understanding, that my ic u nursing practice has been “already deeply hermeneutic” (moules et al., 2011, p. 2). references harvey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 14 6 annells, m. (1996). hermeneutic phenomenology: philosophical perspectives and current use in nursing research. journal of advanced nursing, 23, 705-713. retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(issn)1365-2648 benner, p., hooper-kyriakidis, p., & stannard, d. (1999). clinical forethought: anticipating and preventing potential problems. in p.b. (eds.), clinical wisdom and interventions in critical care: a thinking-in-action approach (1st ed.; pp. 63-88). philadelphia, pa: w.b. saunders company. carper, b.a. (1978). fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. advanced nursing science, 1(1), 13-24. retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/advancesinnursingscience davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: suny press. debesay, j., naden, d., & slettebo, a. (2008). how do we close the hermeneutic circle? a gadamerian approach to justification in interpretation in qualitative studies. nursing inquiry, 15(1), 57-66: doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2008.00390.x gadamer, h-g, (1960/2013). truth and method (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, eds. & trans.). new york, ny: bloomsbury academic. gadamer, h-g. (1996). the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age. stanford, ca: stanford university press. geanellos, r. (1998). hermeneutic philosophy. part i: implications of its use as methodology in interpretive nursing research. nursing inquiry, 5, 154-163. retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/journal/10.1111/(issn)1440-1800 grondin, j. (2003). the philosophy of gadamer. montreal, qc, canada: mcgill-queen’s university press. hay, d., & oken, d. (1972). the psychological stresses of intensive care unit nursing. psychosomatic medicine, 34(2), 109-118. retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/psychosomaticmedicine/pages/default.aspx holroyd, a.e. (2007). interpretive hermeneutic phenomenology: clarifying understanding. indopacific journal of phenomenology, 7(2), 1-12. retrieved from www.ipip.org interpret. (n.d.). online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=critical kinsella, e.a. (2006). hermeneutics and critical hermeneutics: exploring possibilities within the art of interpretation, qualitative social research, 7(3), 1-12. retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs http://www.ipip.org/ harvey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 14 7 moules, n.j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes: an ancestral, substantive and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods, 1(3), article 1. retrieved february 11, 2016, from https://www.ualberta.ca/~ iiqm/backissues/1_3final/html/mo ules.html moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., morck, a.c., & jardine, d.w. (2011). editorial: on applied hermeneutics and the work of the world. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 1. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5kd1qw9 moules, n.j., field, j.c., mccaffrey, g.p., & laing, c.m. (2014). conducting hermeneutic research: the address of the topic. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 7, 1-13. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/index moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. oxford canadian dictionary. (2006). paperback oxford canadian dictionary. don mills, on, canada: oxford university press. strauss, a. (1968). the intensive care unit: its characteristics and social relationships. nursing clinics of north america, 3(1), 7-15. retrieved from http://www.nursing.theclinics.com tanner, c.a. (2006). thinking like a nurse: a research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. journal of nursing education, 45(6), 204-211. retrieved from http://www.healio.com/nursing/journals/jne van manen, m. (2002). ritualized experiences. in m.v. (eds.), writing in the dark: phenomenological studies in interpretive inquiry (1st ed.; pp. 9-25). london, on, canada: the althouse press. walsh, k. (1996). philosophical hermeneutics and the project of hans-georg gadamer: implications for nursing research. nursing inquiry, 3, 231-237. retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(issn)1440-1800 https://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/1_3final/html/moules.html corresponding author: david w. jardine, phd email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics november 22, 2016 the author(s) 2016 guest editorial: “the more intense the practice, the more intense the demons”: a few hermeneutic caveats david w. jardine the main title of this paper has served me as a warning for those interested in hermeneutic work, myself, of course, included. it is from patrul rinpoche (1808-1887) in his text “the words of my perfect teacher” (1998, p. 189) and it summons something of the intimate dangers of carefully studying and becoming familiar with the slipstreams of our lives, both those that live in us, and that we, wittingly or otherwise, live within. there are reasons for these dangers. hermeneutic begins by “giv[ing] up a special idea of foundation in principle” (gadamer, 1984, p. 323), that is, giving up the standard westernphilosophical escape mechanism that allows our studying to have, or at least hope for, solid, final, fixed grounding and therefore to gain confidence and stability by referencing some external, permanent, verity, or verities. it leaves us in an orbit of unheimlichkeit (heidegger, 1976/1962, p. 233) an “un-homelike-ness” in which we must give up such hopes. this, by itself, is vertiginous enough, because it means that hermeneutic study is inevitably haunted by the ghosts of doubt, affliction, exhaustion, fear, and failing. one must become accustomed to sensing that one’s efforts are not enough, that one just might be nothing more than an imposter in this work, work whose imposture is bound to be found out by someone who will trumpet foundational assurances about the topic i may have found so hermeneutically fleeting. two things, here. first, get used to it. second, you have myriad companions in this work, other homeless wanderers. they can’t remedy this situation, but they can commiserate and console and clarify this common lot. they can help you study this mess you’re in and not just suffer it. seek them out. these can be fellow students, scholars present or long-dead. hold your suffering in jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 7 2 common. compassion. even the crack of wood split for winter or the next pull of air, well attended, can help. “everything is teaching you. isn’t this so?” (chah, 2004, p. 5). but there is another layer here which, in part, bespeaks the proximity of hermeneutics to a phenomenological origin, but which also sharply cuts its cleave both to it and from it (see http://www.dabhand.org/wordstudies/cleave.htm for more details on this lovely dual-inverse meaning of cleaving). hermeneutic meditations are a bit like this: understand “meditation” as it is explained in dharmamitra’s clear words commentary (prasphuta-pada): “meditating” is making the mind take on the state or condition of the object of meditation.” (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 111) this bespeaks a whiff of an old aristotelian notion of mensuratio ad rem, that is, that our study must “remain something adapted to the object” (gadamer, 1989, p. 261) and not, instead, something that remains adapted to our methodology, or to the research granting agencies ideas of how to write up a legitimate proposal, or “to the wishes, prejudices, or promptings of the powerful” (p. 261), or to my own hidden or overt pathologies and desires. in this studied and practiced movement to take on the state or condition of the object, it can happen that the object starts to yield up depths and characteristics heretofore unnoticed or occluded. so, the first blush is that the topic we are exploring starts, shall we say, to “break forth” (p. 458) with angular, often suppressed, often pointed bloodlines of implication, contestation, and meaning. such yielding up means that the topic i am investigating starts running down variegated paths whose turns up ahead make me lose sight of what to do, where to go. “we must entrust ourselves to what we are investigating to guide us safely in the quest” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 378). but don’t be fooled, here. we must entrust ourselves even when and even though what we are investigating might unleash demons in us that need to be faced in order for us to proceed. when gadamer speaks of bildung (1960/1989, pp. 9-18), of cultivation and become hale and robust in a complex civil society, of becoming someone through the study one engages in, he’s not simply talking about going to art galleries and other “cultivated,” elitist pleasantries. he is talking about facing the mess of one’s life in our interactions with the world, letting the world in, and letting out our familial, inherited, secret demons to see whether they can live in the light of day: if you are frightened, wondering whether there is a demon in a strange cave at night, your fear is not dispelled until you light a lamp and carefully investigate whether it is there. (tsong-kha-pa, 2002, p. 334) as the object breaks forth, so, too, do i get heretofore secrets secreted, confidences betrayed. i find that my life has been fashioned and inhabited “beyond my wanting and doing” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. xviii). it is quite disturbing to find out that i may have been living a life that is far more unintentionally duplicitous than i hoped or imagined. i think back, over 30 years of work, to how many times http://www.dabhand.org/word%20studies/cleave.htm jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 7 3 those, myself included, who feel hermes rushing nearby and find that that rush unleashes hidden afflictions (e.g., jardine, 2016). the yielding up of the topic has a tendency to cascade back on my own meditations, beckoning the arousing of my own lived experience and my own deep, perhaps unexamined, complicities in and to these depths. hermeneutics thus dually cleaves to phenomenology: this is about my own lived experience as a writer, as a scholar and teacher and student, and the complicities and stubborn blind spots of the life i’ve come to live. but, in such cleavage, i realize that my own lived experience might reveal another level of blockage for which phenomenological descriptions of immediate experience falls bereft: false consciousness. in speaking with a student recently about his work, his responses to my queries and his emergent accusations set off in me a roiling resistance and measured and unmeasured response. my immediate, lived-experience became an outcome of feeling threatened and a withdrawal into self-protection (and then, unfortunately [but luckily briefly] lashing responses from within this coiled mess). we can follow freud, here, or jung, or tsong-kha-pa, or both paul ricouer and gadamer (1984) regarding the hermeneutics of suspicion, in witnessing that lived experience is often a gloss for deeply hidden afflictions whose spells need “break[ing] open” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 362). “neither the knower nor the known is ‘present-at-hand’” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 261) just lying there in the open fully clear and exposed and ready to tell, but is, rather, ensnarled in the world, duplicitous and hidden, not just present, entangled, not just selfexistent. supposed and however-deeply-felt phenomenological immediacy is revealed as profoundly mediated, profoundly dependently co-arising, profoundly in need, therefore, not of surface description but diagnosis, not just “seeing” but “seeing through.” “insight is more than the knowledge of this or that situation. it always involves an escape from something that had deceived us and held us captive” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 356). “breaking the spell” can sounds so trite, but as often happens in those children’s stories of spells cast and broken, the next gesture can be traumatic: oh dear, what have i done? what have i been doing, saying, thinking? i didn’t mean it! honest! thus, the poverty of the mens auctoris (gadamer, 2007, p. 57). there is no method here to help those new to such work to avoid this conundrum. “from it no one can be exempt” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 362), and the only recourse is practice, and that practice must always be done by me, by you, for only there does the locale of hermeneutics really emerge. when gadamer states that, in this work, “we become . . . closer to the real givenness, and we are more aware of the reciprocity between our conceptual efforts and the concrete in life experience,” this reciprocity is not a general or universal procedure, but is what is cleverly and tortuously translated in martin heidegger’s being and time (1962, p. 68, h42) as involving “in each case mineness [jemeinigkeit].” no one can become practiced in my stead. so, be careful, and realize that there are good reasons for many lineages of study to say that you must find a good teacher, a practiced teacher. there is a good reason for thinking of the practice of writing as part of the practice of research itself. play can outplay the players. you can be outrun, overrun, and such “experience[s] … [are] not something anyone can be spared” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 356). gadamer does say that “understanding . . . means that one recognizes that the other person could be right in what he or she says or actually wants to say” (gadamer, 2007, p. 117). however, part of the deceptively alluring face of hermeneutic work can jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 7 4 be the false hope that it just might be my turn to be the one who could be right. maybe i can finally tell my story and be heard uninterrupted. sorry to disappoint, but that is not how this work works. however, it may be why some hermeneutic ventures (including some of my own) can end with emotional fraught failure, having just aroused and incited fears of one’s demons without breaking them open enough to catch the light. references chah, a. (2004). everything is teaching us: a collection of teachings by venerable ajahn chah. victoria, australia: sangha bodhivana monastery. gadamer, h.g. (1984). the hermeneutics of suspicion. man and world, 17, 313-323. gadamer, h.g. (1960/1989). truth and method. new york, ny: continuum press. gadamer, h.g. (2007). the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (r.e. palmer, ed. & trans.). evanston il: northwestern university press. heidegger, m. (1976/1962). being and time. new york ny: harper and row. jardine, d. (2016). thoughts on thinking through regret and how afflictions can be teachers. in d. jardine (2016). in praise of radiant beings: a retrospective path through education, buddhism and ecology (pp. 223-236). charlotte nc: information age publishing. patrul (1998). the words of my perfect teacher. boston, ma: shambhala. tsong-kha-pa (2000). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (lam rim chen mo) vol. 1. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. tsong-kha-pa (2002). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (lam rim chen mo) vol. 3. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. microsoft word hovey et al final.docx corresponding author: richard b. hovey, phd email: richard.hovey@mcgill.ca journal of applied hermeneutics june 8, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 synergistic research in medical education: some philosophical reflections richard b. hovey, charo rodríguez, steven jordan, & angela c. morck abstract in this paper, we present and discuss the “synergistic research approach,” from quantitative and qualitative through mixed methods, as a term that refers to an academic endeavour in which researchers are not only committed to comprehensiveness and rigor, but also – and importantly – to excellence in peer processes that further enhance knowledge generation by emphasizing the philosophical underpinnings thereof. we outline the hermeneutic wager, which provides the philosophical grounds for synergistic research, and explain the reasons why we consider this perspective to be of particular interest in the health profession education field of inquiry. keywords synergistic research, medical education, philosophy of science, hermeneutic wager, personcentred care, research methods as in other health-profession domains, health profession education’s connection to empirical research, traditionally dominated by quantitative methods, has become increasingly open to qualitative research and mixed-methods approaches (lavelle, vuk, & barber, 2013; tavakol & sandars, 2014). positivist/post-positivist paradigms have framed research conducted in natural sciences, and provided the basis for the evidence-based trend in medicine, dentistry, and allied medical sciences. qualitative research approaches, the origins of which can be traced through their application within social sciences, have in turn shaped important medical movements, such as narrative medicine and professionalism. hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 2 concomitantly, the mixed-methods movement has forcefully emerged as a new orthodoxy in health, social and educational research, particularly since the 1990s. the mixed-methods research community has in fact been very successful in introducing mixed-methods studies and pragmatism as the third paradigm in education research (johnson & onwuegbuzie, 2004). as emphasized by creswell and garret, “[a]t this moment in the development of research approaches, the educational researcher needs a large toolkit of methods and designs to address complex, interdisciplinary research problems” (2008, p. 321). some view mixed methods as “direct descendants of classical experimentalism and the triangulation movement of the 1970s” and believe that they “presume a methodological hierarchy, with quantitative methods at the top” and “with qualitative methods playing a subordinate, ancillary role in illuminating quantitative data/findings” (denzin, 2012, p. 81). mixed methods researchers themselves, however, define their approach as “a movement that moves past the paradigm wars by offering a logical and practical alternative” (johnson & onwuegbuzie, 2004, p. 17), one which they view as superior to any purist approach for fulfilling research needs. despite its unquestionable popularity, mixed methods is, according to its tenets, a research movement that is still very much in development (tashakkori & creswell, 2008). this may be due, at least in part, to the controversy it has provoked (e.g., denzin, 2010; giddins, 2006; symonds & gorard, 2010). interestingly, although the reflexive stance displayed by some leading mixed methods researchers is laudable (e.g., bergman, 2011; creswell, 2011), a sort of purism can also be identified in this community of scholars: the same purist stance that they associate with scholars framed within the first and second research paradigms (johnson & onwuegbuzie, 2004) when they in turn state that research innovation, interdisciplinarity, and best ways to face complex problems seem only possible through mixed methods research (e.g., hesse-biber & johnson, 2013). advocating for synergistic research in health education our intention in this paper is to respectfully contribute to this debate by proposing a synergistic research approach to health profession education. two main, intertwined arguments support our proposal. first, in contrast to morgan (2007) who argued that there is “little reason why purely epistemological issues should be of major interest to social science research methodologists” because “that is the province of philosophers” (p. 68), we contend, with others, that this is precisely the researcher’s philosophical stance when conducting research that “fleshes-out” the research process and makes it truly substantive. in support of this position, see for instance vattimo (2011), who stated that we cannot simply accredit the truth of our practices to science or the application of science without appealing to what he terms “the paradigmatic horizon within which every correspondence is verifiable” (p. xxxiii). vattimo agreed with gadamer’s (1996) argument of practice, in terms of phronesis, that is to say that we should not merely accept a theory or research outcome as truth without paying heed to context(s) that require attention and a depth of understanding (lund, panayotidis, smits, & towers, 2012). secondly, at a more practical level, we view synergistic research as an academic endeavour that aims not only to examine complex problems in a comprehensive and rigorous way (something empirical researchers of any allegiance agree with), but also to emphasize excellence in peer processes whereby new knowledge is generated precisely by considering the philosophical hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 3 underpinnings of thereof. in an era in which specialization is rewarded everywhere and seen as preferable, the intention of synergistic research is to bring together researchers from different disciplines and experts in specific domains who hold uniquely different backgrounds and experiences and whose research may be framed in different paradigms, but who are united by their shared concern with the philosophy of research. synergistic research would therefore be instantiated in interdisciplinary research programs that, beyond the mere use of multiple toolkits for research, are respectful of different paradigmatic requirements for exploring the same phenomenon in a complementary, comprehensive, and inclusive manner. our advocacy for synergistic research in health professions education has an ultimate goal: to meet the imperative need to educate medical and other health providers in a way that enables them to overcome the current tension between science and care. as noted by dunn and jones (2010), “[w]e found that care and science logics coexist, moving through periods of balance and imbalance and residing in perhaps an uneasy tension that is not easily resolved in medical education” (p. 139). this is foundational to the understanding that a research project is not interdisciplinary if it merely borrows or replicates methodologies from different disciplines without truly understanding the philosophical and theoretical premises that are foundational and that provide rigor and substance. why the tag “synergistic” research? we adopted the term “synergistic” research to help describe this approach because it refers to a collective effect that is greater than the sum of our individual research approaches, pre-understandings, and epistemologies. etymologically, the term is derived from the greek word synergia, meaning “joint work, a working together, cooperation; assistance,” which is in turn derived from synergos, meaning “working together” (from syn“together”+ ergon “work”). in english, synergy commonly refers to an advanced effectiveness as a result of cooperation. this is more than a mere application of method but speaks to the possibility of an expanded horizon of understanding, through research that is at its core dialogical, open, and interdisciplinary (synergy, n.d.). if language matters – which it does – then the words we choose to name our research philosophy also helps to establish the quality of the team’s interactions: that is, how inclusive and relational the co-participants are with each other and, especially, with research participants (gadamer, 1960/1989; wittgenstein, 2009). researchers become aware that “understanding is not something that takes place at the end of humanistic research about an object, it stands at the beginning and governs the whole process of questioning, step by step” (gadamer, 2001, p. 50). within this research approach, we understand that the production of best or promising evidence needs to be inclusive of multiple epistemologies, ontologies, methods, statistics, narratives, analyses, and ways of knowing. research begins with a topic and defines how the questions of interest are to be researched through conversations with scholars from various disciplines, through education, and in particular through different ways of knowing. through researcher engagement focused on a common or shared topic, we can begin to think creatively about how to best answers questions that generate new knowledge together. by reifying methods, that is, by being method-driven and choosing the research method first and then aligning the topic to fit the method (even mixed methods), we can lose the very essence of what we are trying to understand. research… hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 4 is basically not a problem of method at all. it is not concerned primarily with amassing verified knowledge, such as would satisfy the methodological ideal of science –yet it, too, is concerned with knowledge and with truth. but what kind of knowledge and what kind of truth? (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. xi) philosophical underpinnings of research our philosophical orientation for synergistic research is grounded in hermeneutics, which advocates that subjectivity is not a barrier to superior objectivity, but rather an opening to it. subjectivity in the sense of having a distinct but negotiated point of view can be regarded as enabling a new and different understanding to emerge (davey, 2006; gadamer, 1960/1989). learning from the other occurs when the other challenges our knowledge, experiences, and preconceptions. the result of dialogical hermeneutics encounters are intended to leave both parties thinking in different and unexpected ways about the analysis given and received. the formal employment of part/whole figures of thought clearly contributes to the transformation of understanding, yet such transformation happens to us and in unpredictable fashion (gadamer, 1992). these we contend cannot be achieved by application of method alone, but are actively achieved through encountering and valuing other perspectives (theories). otherwise, learning may be mistaken for an affirmation of something already known, or for an extension of that knowledge, but not as new learning. to understand conscious subjectivity requires a “positive commitment to deepening and exploring its enabling assumptions suggests that objectivity can no longer be understood as the absence of subjectivity” (davey, 2006, p. 19). in other words, humans live and experience their world in context and interpretively; consequently all research, including those that methodologically strive for objectivity to determine truth, will always be influenced by the contextual disposition of human experience. philosophical hermeneutics distinctly assigns a dignity to the difference between researchers and their participants and/or patients, and contends that the differential space of the in-between has its beginning in the process of the hermeneutical encounter, which invites us to allow those who see and think things differently to expand our understanding (gadamer, 1960/1989, 1992). this is contrary to most traditional methodological research thinking, but intriguing: a process through which one does not deny, suspend, or bind one’s background and biases, but through which one strives to understand and use them, because it is through heterogeneity of thought and commitment to one’s discipline vis-à-vis others that sophisticated new and different understanding may be achieved. synergistic researchers are aware of the value of the relational within the research process and the need for conversation and reflection as essential properties to successful interdisciplinarity (hovey & craig, 2011). the hermeneutic wager the hermeneutic wager (kearney, 2010) is a means of assessing personal and professional risk of engaging within a synergistic research approach; because the researchers are interested in the same topic and each one is already an accomplished investigator with his or her own methodological expertise, this approach invites openness, authenticity, and a focus on the relational aspects of working together (treanor, 2010). however, our encultured ways of knowing and hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 5 understanding one’s role may provide hidden barriers to interdisciplinary research, a privileging of certain kinds of research methods or one’s perceived status within the research team (hovey & craig, 2011). inspired by kearney’s work (2010), we offer five conversation topics as a reflective process to co-create an interdisciplinary research team that is stronger, more creative, and has greater potential to understand complex health concerns: imagination, humility, commitment, discernment, and hospitality. the hermeneutic wager from richard kearney’s philosophy (2010) was adapted into an application or a practical approach to building interdisciplinary teams in research. this approach is relational as it helps to describe what each researcher brings to the table from their discipline specfic knowledge. the hermeneutic wager provides a philosophical-relational foundation from which a team can be built (treanor, 2010). this perspective aligns with the work of philosophy that as gadamer (1998) stated is “to clarify concepts, not to present a new body of knowledge through empirical research” (p. 101). applied hermeneutics is, in brief, a means to gain a deep understanding of a topic, human experience, or event. it does so through conversation with others, who can add other perspectives and understanding to a shared topic or experience of interest, such as the differences encountered when interdisciplinary researchers work to build their team. the hermeneutic wager is about decision-making and describes a conversational process to guide the interdisciplinary research team’s development and to build a highly functional team. in practice, the hermeneutic wager consists of five conversations that are not to be understood as a linear progression nor a series of graduated steps where when one is completed the team graduates to the next step and so on until all five have been achieved. rather, the five conversations of imagination, humility, commitment, discernment, and hospitality are circular in nature, as each one may resurface, again and again, during the building of the team and will last through the duration of the team’s tenure. the hermeneutic wager keeps the conversation alive, promotes understanding through the interpretation of new knowledge, and is open to differences among the team members. a wager also speaks to the individual team member’s perceived risk during their participation. the risk is weighed out through the participant’s capacity to change in order to contribute to the team as an equal. this may impinge of one’s socially constructed professional identity or perceived hierarchy and status. the hermeneutic wager’s conversations help to identify these risks personal and professional and bring them forward so that they can discuss and be addressed, rather than remaining hidden. imagination the first conversation invites imagination. for this, all members of the research team imagine what together they could accomplish as an interdisciplinary team with its advantages, challenges, and value. the research teams discuss strengths and limitations from multiple perspectives. these discussions are conducted openly and express pre-understandings, reflections, and attitudes from team participants. the intention of the imagining conversations was to begin to creatively explore potential interdisciplinarity without restrictions, limitations, or only discipline hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 6 specific encultured thinking. imagination is where ideas flourish, are discussed, and considered for their potential to exceed individual or siloed understandings. the imagination conversation introduces very little risk to one’s perceived research role. the intent is to explore, share, and envision. although this conversation is mostly hypothetical, it does provide a means to move from ambiguity to a shared perspective of what the interdisciplinary team and research could become. humility the next conversation, humility, entails reflection, both personal and professional, to see beyond encultured perceptions, personal/professional identity, wants, and needs and move toward what has been imagined through the previous conversation. humility invites generosity and thinking that enhances the potential openness to other perspectives, possibilities, and understandings. humility is meant to alert participants of their beliefs, values, and behaviours that might interfere with team building and function. this conversation for some participants may offer a higher level of risk. it calls into question participants’ ability to encounter and understand others perspectives that may be different than one’s own. the humility conversation also asks participants to reflect upon how they and others position within the interdisciplinary team. it entails a willingness to be open to other team members’ strengths and how these might be utilized within the team structure. this premises that at certain points during the research process some members will take a leadership role while, at other times, they will allow the strengths of others to come to the forefront and lead. the essence of this conversation is related to the etymological root hume meaning humanizing which can be found in humility, humour, and humanity (kearney, 2010). this speaks to the relational aspects of interdisciplinarity in which humility is about humanizing conversations and forming relationships that bring people together. commitment commitment provokes participants’ willingness to assume the risk associated with the team building process. commitment challenges participants to make explicit their intention to follow through with the process and is an essential condition for the building of highly effective interdisciplinary teams. without commitment from all team members, the process may stall in the superficiality of rhetoric or fail all together. all participants should now have made clear their intentions to continue or not with the team building and research. some participants will be fully supportive, while others may not, and some may remain undecided. if participants are aware of issues that create tension or divisiveness within the team, then specific measures to promote understanding can be taken. commitment to interdisciplinarity must be the unique motivational force that drives the responsibility and desire of team members to work together. this conversation asks participants to examine and be honest about their commitment to the team building process, to the interdisciplinarity nature of the team and research, and to the topic itself. the research teams utilize this conversation as a check in about how the team is progressing overall, but also as individual participants within the process. discernment hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 7 discernment refers to the reality of this team building and research endeavour -in essence, asks the practical question: does what the team has envisioned make sense? discernment challenges imagination because it recognizes that not all possibilities are equal, valid, or realistic. this conversation tempers commitment with the reminder that some wagers are ill advised, impractical, or that some participants may not be ready for the changes to personal/professional selves that the team and the research asks of them. this is the conversation where practical judgment and understandings are confronted and risks are discussed and weighed. discernment asks of participants to examine the enablers and barriers to the team working together and in bringing the research to fruition. it is a formative reality check designed to examine who else might need to be invited as new participants to the team if needed to address gaps in ability, knowledge, financial, or system support, access to the population of interest, or other practical process issues. the team is then asked to brainstorm (re-imagine) around resolutions and other resources that have been identified. discernment means to thoroughly examine its progress and make explicit the concerns before the team fails or falters. the practicalities of the research and the demands of team building initial enthusiasm dwindles if not championed or brought forward by all of the team members. hospitality hospitality means to welcome the research team building process with the participants respecting and honouring their diversity and an unconditional openness with all others with a desire to achieve something extraordinary. this conversation also describes the relational considerations of being with others to ensure the interaction between and among people is just, professional, supportive, and compassionate. hospitality works to keep the process open because interdisciplinary teamwork will always need ongoing and further conversations, research, practice, and engagement. hospitality can also be understood as the relational foundation that keeps the team going. it is the welcoming of, and expectation that there will be, bumps on the road for all research teams during their formation and while they as a team co-exist. it asks of team members to be open to differences in team member’s ideas and working styles. how this is brought to fruition will vary from team to team but at its core is a willingness to be open to learning from each other. these five conversations and reflections cycle back and forth as new considerations, issues, success, set backs or concerns arise. the hermeneutic wager should not considered a linear or sequential structure but rather as five interconnected conversations and reflections that serve to keep team members open and productive to discuss, address, and readdress topics while the team ebbs and flows in its processes. in sum, all members of the research team imagine what a synergistic research approach could accomplish, its advantages, challenges, and potential. all synergistic research team members are openly included in the discussion on its strengths and limitations. this way, all members get to express their own pre-understandings of, reflections on, and attitudes towards the research. the imagination phase subjects the participants to very little risk because this is purely an experience in exploration, sharing and envisioning. imagination’s primary purpose is to help people arrive at hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 8 a shared understanding and express their own ways of knowing and understanding research as interdisciplinary. this requires reflection, both self and professional, to see beyond encultured perceptions, wants, and needs toward what has been imagined through this activity. humility invites generosity and thinking that enhances being open to each other’s perspectives, possibilities, and modes of research. this challenges researchers to make their intention to follow through with the process explicit. it is an essential condition for the development of an interdisciplinary research project to take shape and find its place and culture within the established epistemologies of practice. all of the stakeholders have now made their intentions to act clear – some are supportive, others perhaps not, and others still remain undecided; however, by identifying the issues that create tension within the group, we can then take specific measures to promote understanding. commitment to synergistic research must be the unique motivational force that drives the responsibility and desire for researchers to work together. discernment acts as a reality check to ensure that the synergistic researchers are truly ready to move forward to face the challenges or risks. finally, hospitality keeps the conversation process open because interdisciplinarity will always need ongoing and further conversations and reflections about the research, practice, and engagement. conclusion we contend that synergistic research is essential to exploring health profession education issues that support practitioners in facing complex healthcare conditions where fragmentation of research fails to provide person-centred interdisciplinary health care. the theory (our professional and research methodological expertise and identity) and practice (our professional engagement with learners, peers, and ultimately patients) of research cannot reach its fullest potential without a philosophical foundation that underpins how we offer educational experiences, conduct ourselves as researchers, and focus on interdisciplinarity for enhanced clinical practice. the defragmentation of research means working with others who are different in their ways of knowing, understanding, and researching. working through difficult conversations – those that challenge or disrupt our habitual ways of knowing and researching – can produce new and different interdisciplinary understandings for enhanced human science research, education, and health professional practice. in closing, we advocate research that is interdisciplinary and conversational ways of teaching, learning, and researching through which we strive to become better at everything we do. bios richard b. hovey, phd is an associate professor of oral health and society, and director of faculty development at the faculty of dentistry, mcgill university. chair, mcgill group on transformational learning in health (tlh) charo rodríguez, md, phd is an associate professor of family medicine, and director of the family medicine educational research group (fmer), department of family medicine, faculty of medicine, mcgill university. she is also frq-s senior research scholar. member, mcgill group on transformational learning in health (tlh) hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 9 steven jordan, phd is an associate professor and chair, integrated studies in education, department of education, faculty of education, mcgill university. member, mcgill group on transformational learning in health (tlh) references bergman, m.m. (2011). the good, the bad, and the ugly in mixed methods research and design. journal of mixed methods research, 5, 271-275. creswell, j.w., & garrett, a.l. (2008). the “movement” of mixed methods research and the role of educators. south african journal of education, 28, 321-333. creswell, j.w. (2011). controversies in mixed methods research. in n.k. denzin & y.s. lincoln, eds., the sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 269-281). thousand oaks, ca: sage. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: suny press. denzin n.k. (2010). moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. qualitative inquiry, 16, 419. doi: 10.1177/1077800410364608 denzin, n.k. (2012). triangulation 2.0. journal of mixed methods research, 6, 80-88. gadamer, h-g. (2001). gadamer in conversation: reflections and commentary (r. e. palmer, ed. & trans). new haven, ct: yale university press. gadamer, h-g. (1999). praise of theory: speeches and essays. (c. dawson, trans.) new haven, ct: yale university press. gadamer, h-g. (1992). hans-georg gadamer on education, poetry, and history: applied hermeneutics. (d. misgeld & g. nicholson, trans.) albany, ny: suny press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd ed.; j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. giddings, l.s. (2006). mixed-methods research – positivism dressed in drag? journal of research in nursing, 11, 195-203. hovey, r., & craig, r. (2011). understanding the relational aspects of learning with, from, and about the other. nursing philosophy, 12(4), 262-270. johnson, r.b., & onwuegbuzie a.j. (2004). mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. educational research, 33, 14-26. kearney, r. (2011). anatheism: returning to god after god. new york, ny: columbia university press. hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 10 lavelle, e., vuk, j., & barber, c. (2013). twelve tips for getting started using mixed methods in medical education research. medical teacher, 35, 272-276. lund, d. e., panayotidis, e. l., smits, h., & towers, j. (2012). provoking conversation on inquiry in teacher education. new york, ny: peter lang. morgan, d.l. (2007). paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. journal of mixed methods research, 1, 48-76. tashakkori, a., & creswell, j.w. (2007). the new era of mixed methods. [editorial]. journal of mixed methods research, 1, 3-7. tavakol, m., & sandars, j. (2014). quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: amee guide no 90: part i. medical teacher, 36, 746-756. treanor, b. (2010). the anatheistic wager: faith after faith. religion and the arts, 14(1), 547560. symonds, j., & gorard, s. (2010). death of mixed methods? or the rebirth of research as a craft. evaluation & research in education, 23, 121-136. synergy (n.d.) in online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=synergy vattimo, g. (2011). farwell to truth. new york, ny: columbia university press. wittgenstein, l. (2009). philosophical investigations (4th ed.; g.e.m. anscombe, m.s. hacker, & j. schulte, trans.). west sussex, uk: wiley-blackwell. microsoft word laing corrected proof.docx 1 university of calgary corresponding author: catherine m. laing email: laingc@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 31, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 stories from cancer camp: tales of glitter and gratitude catherine m. laing1 & nancy j. moules1 abstract each year in canada, approximately 1400 children and adolescents under the age of 20 are diagnosed with cancer. it is well recognized that childhood cancer affects the entire family, and innumerable challenges accompany this diagnosis. in recognition of the challenges that accompany this disease, cancer camps started in the 1970s to help children and their families escape the rigidity and severity of cancer treatment. very little is known about how camps affect these families, and to that end, a philosophical hermeneutic study was conducted to understand the meaning of children’s cancer camps for the child with cancer and the family. six families were interviewed to bring understanding to this topic, and while the research included findings related to the concept of play, fit and acceptance, grief, and community, this paper will detail the finding related to storytelling and the reshaping of experiences that happens by virtue of being at camp. keywords hermeneutics, storytelling, cancer camp, pediatric oncology in response to the challenges and stress of childhood cancer, children’s cancer camps arose in the 1970s as a way for children and their families to escape the rigorousness of cancer treatment (bluebond-langner, perkel, goertzel, nelson, & mcgeary, 1990; kids cancer care foundation of alberta, 2012). cancer camps are designed to meet the needs of the whole family at each stage in the cancer experience, including survivorship or bereavement (kids cancer care foundation of alberta, 2012). currently in canada, eight cancer camps provide service to 5,252 children and their families (canadian association of pediatric oncology camps, 2012), and as more children are surviving childhood cancer, the need for specialized camps and community laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 2 programs continues to grow (laing & moules, 2013). our intent in this paper is to describe one of the findings of the first author’s philosophical hermeneutic doctoral research around understanding the meaning of children’s cancer camps for the child with cancer and the family. while the doctoral thesis included findings related to: the concept of play at cancer camp (both philosophically and theoretically) (laing, 2012); the fit and acceptance that children and families find at camp (laing & moules, 2013); the solidarity of the community – the “camp family” – as one that creates intense, healing bonds (laing & moules, in press); and grief as something that children and families experience differently, this paper will detail the finding related to storytelling, both by children and parents, as a means of re-shaping and understanding traumatic experiences. background information and literature review while very few studies related to children’s cancer camps have been conducted, there are many anecdotal accounts of the benefit of cancer camps. a search of nursing, education, family, and psychology databases yielded 16 studies pertaining specifically to children’s cancer camps; in other words, very little is understood about the effects of cancer camps on the child and family (laing & moules, 2013). of the available literature, topics such as self-concept (benson, 1987; kessell, resnick, & blum, 1985; murray, 2001), psychosocial impact (packman et al., 2008; wellisch, crater, wiley, belin, & weinstein, 2006), medical knowledge (carpenter, sahler, & davis, 1990; bluebond-langner et al., 1990), and other measurable constructs have been examined. most studies report either a neutral (or undetectable) effect from camp, or a marginal improvement on the construct in question, most relating this to self-reported limitations of insufficiently powered sample sizes and lack of control groups. more research has been conducted in the fields of outdoor programming and therapeutic camping – a term used to describe a purposeful approach to recreation, often involving marginalized or vulnerable populations. a meta-analysis of outdoor education programs suggested that selfconcept, academic performance, leadership, interpersonal skills, personality, and adventuresomeness were all mildly positively correlated to outdoor programming (hattie, marsh, neill, & richards, 1997). recently, certain childhood disease groups have organized camps for children specific to their disease (e.g., camp huff n’ puff [asthma], camp maska [nephrology]). there has been a significant amount of research pertaining to these therapeutic camps (e.g., mishna, michalski, & cummings, 2001; walker & pearman, 2009; welch, carlson, larson, & fena, 2007), with most researchers concluding that these camps have a positive effect on the children for whom they are targeted. childhood cancer, however, is a unique disease, and with it comes unique challenges, differences, and outcomes that must be considered with respect to camp (laing & moules, 2013). to the best of our knowledge, this was the first qualitative study undertaken in search of understanding the meaning of these camps to children with cancer and their families. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 3 research design method the research question for this study was, “how might we understand the meaning of children's cancer camps on children and their families?” this research was guided by philosophical hermeneutics, defined as the art, tradition, and practice of interpretation (gadamer, 1960/1989), as developed by hans-georg gadamer (1900-2002). hermeneutics is interested in human experience, and offers a way to know and understand the world and, thus, the topic (gadamer, 1960/1989). it is a sophisticated method of research and approach to understanding within the human sciences, and, particularly in health care, hermeneutics has been shown to have invaluable applied utility (moules, mccaffrey, morck, & jardine, 2011). hermeneutics helps us make sense of the particulars (moules, 2002) and arrive at deeper understandings of how children’s cancer camps, for example, impact children with cancer and their families. hermeneutics, as an approach to research, is an interpretive methodology, a reflexive inquiry, where the researcher is not considered a separate entity, or non-influencing factor, from that which she/he is researching. the “data,” ricoeur (1981) offered, never stand alone as their meaning depends on the researcher and the reader. hermeneutics seeks to understand rather than explain. recruitment of participants the appropriate individuals to include in a hermeneutic inquiry are ones that can best inform understanding of the topic (known as purposive sampling) as it is the researcher’s aim to elicit a richness of data through the experiences of the participants (laing & moules, 2013). the participants for this research included children with cancer and their families who attended the 2012 kids cancer care (kcc) foundation’s camp kindle in the summer camping season. seven families were contacted about participation in this study by the kcc family liaison, with 6 families (table 1) agreeing to participate (equaling 19 participants in total). upon stating their agreement to the family liaison, the interested families were then contacted by me (first author) to further explain the study. it is worth noting here for clarity, that for many families, cancer camp is not a one-time event. kids cancer care (like similar philanthropic organizations) offers weekend camps and other events throughout the year, in hopes to engage, support, and connect children with cancer and their families. data generation after informed written consent was obtained, i conducted semi-structured interviews at the location of the participant’s choosing (three interviews occurred in the participants’ homes, one interview was at a public library, one was at a local recreation complex, and one was at a coffee shop). each interview took 1 to 1 ½ hours, and was recorded and transcribed for ongoing analysis, and basic demographics of the participants were also obtained. after each interview, field notes were written to capture contextual details to assist with the data analysis. all interviews took place within one month of camp attendance. in addition, i attended camp as a participant observer on 6 occasions throughout the 2012 summer camping season which generated further data that was incorporated into the analysis. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 4 table 1 participant characteristics analysis and interpretation of data data analysis is synonymous with interpretation in the tradition of hermeneutics (moules, 2002; moules, laing, mccaffrey, tapp, & strother, 2012), and arriving at interpretations is a rigorous practice bringing together knowledge, information, conversation, experience, and data. to understand the process of how interpretations are developed, the concepts of fusion of horizons and the hermeneutic circle merit discussion. the fusion of horizons, where “horizon” is a metaphor for how reality is perceived and interpreted (austgard, 2012), is the coming together of more than one understanding of the topic, coupled with the curiosity and desire of the researcher to understand the topic in a new way (binding & tapp, 2008; koch, 1996). the hermeneutic circle is the metaphorical representation of understanding the whole by grasping its parts and by comprehending the meaning of the parts, by considering the whole (crotty, 1998). this movement in and out of “parts and wholes” is circular, recursive, and involves the researchers as an integral part of the circle. the hermeneutic circle invites the researcher to consider the particulars participants family structure present at interview status original diagnosis family a mother child 1: 9y child 2: 11y child 3: 14 y mother, child 1, child 2, child 3 child 2 is cancer survivor x 10 years; 5th time at camp wilms’ tumor family b mother father child 1: 5y child 2: 8y mother, father, child 1, child 2 child 2 currently on active treatment; 3rd time at camp leukemia family c mother father child 1: 10y child 2: 12y child 3: 14y mother child 2 off therapy x 5 years; 4th time at camp brain tumor mcmahon family mother father child 1: deceased child 2: 9y child 3: 12y child 4: 15y child 5: 17y mother, father, child 2, child 3, child 4, child 5 bereaved family. child 1 passed away from cancer 6 years ago (aged 2 years); 6th time at camp leukemia family e mother father child 1: 5y child 2: 7y mother, father, child (age 7) child 2 had just completed active therapy; 2nd time at camp brain tumor family f mother father child 1: 9y child 2: 10y mother child 2 off therapy x 1 year; 3rd time at camp brain tumor laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 5 of the topic in the context of the familiar, and similarly, the familiar in the context of the particulars (gadamer, 1960/1989; grondin, 1999/2003; moules, 2002). this movement in and out of the data, extensive readings and re-readings, reflection, dialogue, and challenging taken-forgranted assumptions allows for consideration of that which might not have been initially visible, and enhances the understanding of the topic (laing & moules, 2013; moules, 2002). the remainder of this manuscript is related directly to the findings around the concept of storytelling that occurs at children’s cancer camps. it is appropriate that, at this point, hermeneutics, as a topic, will disappear into the background while the topic of storytelling takes center stage (moules, 2002). in the next section, we offer an engagement in the world of children’s cancer camps and the lives of these families who live with the diagnosis of childhood cancer. interpretive analysis children never get to the point, they surround it. the importance of the point is the landscape of it. you begin discussing “the rainfall of vancouver island” and somebody has an uncle who lives there. and there is an uncle in alberta who has a zillion cows, some chickens, and a horse (we get to feed the chickens and ride the horse), which brings us to an uncle in saskatchewan, who has a house where deer pass the kitchen window every morning (he take us out and shows us where they go). if there were no uncles on vancouver island it would never rain there. (stevens, 1981, cited in jardine & clandinin, 1987, p. 477) i heard stories from children during the research interviews but even more so at camp. on the way to and from activities, during activities, during mealtimes, during “quiet time” – stories filled any potentially quiet and empty space of camp. children told each other stories, they told the counselors stories, they told me stories, and at times, frankly, it was overwhelming and consuming for my quiet, adult nature, but the more i thought about it and watched what was happening, the more i was able to see how this normal, unassuming occurrence was serving a very important role. because, as stevens (1981) said, “children never get to the point, they surround it. the importance of the point is the landscape of it” (cited in jardine & clandinin, 1987, p. 477). laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 6 stevens’ (1981) poem, particularly the first four lines, has had me pause to consider “points” and “landscapes,” of stories. with children, the importance of the point is the landscape of it; in other words, it is in their stories where the value lies. so common were their stories, that i almost missed them. i almost did not appreciate their importance because they were so pervasive, much like when something is so common one stops “seeing” it after a while. the stories of these children were not “just” stories; there was a lot happening in these stories, however in order to understand the profundity of them, one must first appreciate the tradition of storytelling. storytelling is said to have been around since the development of language. it has been used for centuries as a vehicle of communication and a way of passing wisdom along through the generations (koch, 1998). “stories are how we learn. the progenitors of the world's religions understood this, handing down our great myths and legends from generation to generation” (mooney & holt, 1996, p. 7). they are an important form of communication through which individuals, communities, and society conveys important messages, entertainment, knowledge, and experience to others (bowles, 1995). stories assist with reaffirming our lives and experiences, helping us connect with our inner selves and others (atkinson, 2002). “stories” and “narratives” are often used interchangeably in the literature (riley & hawe, 2005). people lead storied lives (connelly & clandinin, 1990), and frank (2000) suggested that people convey and tell stories rather than narratives. wiltshire (1995) defined stories as personal experiences, informally and subjectively recounted, while rubin and rubin (2005) offered that stories are purposeful, and have the ability to change. narratives, conversely, have been defined as being more structured and formal (wiltshire, 1995), a partial and formed description of a larger story (rubin & rubin, 2005), and, with respect to research, structured and formal accounts containing researcher additions and omissions (east, jackson, o’brien, & peters, 2010). while i appreciate the distinction between the terms, for the purposes of this discussion, i have chosen to use the term story, as i believe it best speaks to the nature of what it is children and families are doing – they are telling their stories. the stories of the children: feeding chickens and riding horses perhaps most fittingly, it is appropriate that i begin this part of the discussion by way of a story, of sorts. when i interviewed the mcmahon1 family, the youngest child, christina, nine years old, sat quietly at the end of the couch near her dad. i was aware of her watching me, constantly, but she said little, usually being drowned out by her more gregarious older sisters and brother. she was wearing her camp shirt signed by fellow campers and counselors, and when i commented on it she beamed with pride, clearly happy i noticed. christina contributed little for the first twothirds of the interview, and i got the impression she was happy to sit on the sidelines. something happened, though, toward the end and christina, all of a sudden, dominated the interview. as i reviewed the transcript, i counted thirteen times she spoke in the last third of the interview, versus two times in the first two thirds. i offer the following section of transcript not for the content, specifically, but more for the “dynamic” of what was happening: 1 the mcmahon family has asked me to refer to them by their real names instead of using pseudonyms. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 7 christina: also one of the things that i really liked was um, we were doing these super skills and i was in the studio and i learned a different way of finger-netting and um, these other people wanted me to show them how to do it, then all the people wanted to do it. cml (interviewer): so you got to teach everybody how to do it? christina: yeah, and well, i told one of the counselors how to do it and she, like, some people from my group, we added all ours together. older sister: tell her how long it was when you added it together. christina: um, well mine, it was like a square and i had different colors, red, purple, blue, and i could jump over it, and then a lot of people wanted me to make, help them make some, and then like, they had fun. cml: so you got pretty good at that! older sister: they like, linked all their finger-nettings together, it was from one goal post to the other goal post, it was long. christina: (laughing) yeah, it was long enough that like, a lot of people liked it, they had fun. and her group (pointing to older sister), they were doing face painting and they liked it. older sister: every day we would have a new theme so on the day of her show and tell we would have diva faces…glitter everywhere…and we had flowers, we did a tiger, we did an old man face… christina: um, there were other super skill groups like…(everyone starts talking at once, can’t make anything out). christina was engaged with me and telling me a story, her story, of something she did at camp. i, frankly, had no idea what she was describing at the time (it took me listening, and re-listening to the recording several times to understand what she was talking about). she talked quickly, her body leaning toward me, her eyes locked on mine, willing me to stay with her story. the kind of story nine year olds tell, with ambiguous beginnings, middles, and endings – the kind of story you need to “peripherally” listen to, because you lose the point when you listen straight on. the “point,” i realized, was about how she took a leadership role in her group, and taught others a skill she had mastered. the point for her, however, lay in the landscape of the story, the fingernetting, the colors, the fact that everyone had fun – not at all about mastery and leadership. both of christina’s parents commented on her sudden talkativeness during the interview: christina: some of these people, like, i’ve had the same leader for two years, for sparks and kindling 1, last year and this year, and we did the same thing, and well, i remember we did the scavenger hunt and we all had a lot of fun, like, we traded people – well, only my group and another group, and like, this one time it said “find a robot watch” and it was rocket’s birthday that day, and orca called over rocket and so we started singing happy birthday, and then we noticed the robot watch and were like, “oh, there it is!” and then the climbing wall, the giant swing, the zip-line, i hadn’t done the giant swing or zip line yet and it was a really good experience for me. father: you’re just a chatty cathy, i like this! mother: i’ve never heard you talk so much! her talkativeness was further punctuated after the interview was over and christina and her mother were showing me pictures and mementos of tanner, their child and brother who had died. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 8 christina remained very talkative, telling me stories about how she would accompany her brother when he needed painful procedures, and how “they didn’t let anyone into the room, but they let me in because they knew i could help calm him down.” at one point, her mother said, “this is so unlike her. she never talks this much!” and i wondered about this for many days afterwards. something had happened there, something was going on, and i was reminded of gadamer’s words, “understanding begins when something addresses us,” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 299), but, as jardine (2012) pointed out, “it only begins there” (p. 4). in order to understand what is happening when we tell our stories, it is important to look beyond just the words. the stories we tell are not to say what we know, but to find out what we know, and in telling stories, “we try to make sense of life, like we try to make sense of a text when we interpret it” (widdershoven, 1993, p. 9). stories of illness (in christina’s case, of her brother’s illness) help make sense and give meaning to dramatic and confusing times of life (abma, 2005; bosticco & thompson, 2005). we are our stories, and abram (2010) reminded us that, historically, “spoken stories were the living encyclopedias of our oral ancestors” (p. 10), often carrying practical knowledge like instructions for the hunting of various animals, which plants were good to eat and which were poisonous, and how to construct a winter shelter. we come from a tradition of storytelling that served a practical purpose of how to live in the world. our stories today, though not often practical in the sense of how to construct a winter shelter or avoid consuming poisonous plants, remain practical in the sense of making sense and increasing understanding of personal experiences (frank, 1995), and promoting awareness of, and reflection on, life circumstances (carlick & biley, 2004). they still teach us how to live in the world, particularly when faced with the task of making sense of illness or tragedy. the process of telling a story is interesting, given the fallibility of memory is such that people remember a story the way they wish to remember it (kitzinger, 2004). stories are subjective, wrote sandelowski (1993), and they are influenced by environments, social situations, changing perspectives, the audience, and the purpose of relating the story. when telling a story, we make choices about what to include, highlighting some events and omitting others (bauman, 2004). it is precisely this, however, the subjectivity, inclusion or exclusion of events, and the personal choices that are made in the telling, that makes it a story. like christina, when these children told their stories, they were making sense of their lives. their stories were helping them process, understand, and deal with profound events – the kind of events, like being diagnosed with cancer as a child or losing a brother to cancer, that are difficult to make sense of, even for adults. i am not suggesting that their stories were always serious or even about cancer most of the time; i believe, however that, like christina, sometimes the landscapes of their stories, the hidden points, best seen by sideways glances, were what helped them reflect on, and make sense of, childhood cancer. camp provided innumerable opportunities, spaces, and places in which the children could fill with their stories, and it was as if, by the end, they had found a new way to live in the world. the storyteller does not stand outside of all stories as the purveyor who then decides what information to embody in a story but stands in the story as its teller. the story must be conceived as a recollection of community, a recollection of belonging together. everyone, teacher and child, laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 9 has a story to tell. the importance of the storytelling analogy is that it contains in itself the selfrecognition of being an analogy. of course, it must do this because, after all, what is a story but an analogy – an analogue which gathers for us, teacher and children, the most significant and true elements of our being in the world. (jardine & clandinin, 1987, p. 480) the stories of parents: “even the earth trembles now and again” (sogyal rinpoche, 1993) storytelling, or sharing of stories, does not just take place among the children, at camp. sharing of stories is another way in which parents too, benefit from the camp experience. i wish to tilt the angle of this lens, just slightly, and focus not as much on the stories of the parents, per se, rather on underlying message i heard from parents. i guess for me, points of gratefulness too, just that recognition of, and i don’t know how many times i said it, but the willingness of people to sacrifice their money, their time, whatever, so that people like us can have a safe place to go. i don’t know how many times i cried when i was there [camp] (crying). and, you know, i went up to [the people who spoke at the] grand opening and i just i thanked them, cause i said, you know what, like, so many people give of themselves and they’ve never been through it. and i guess i find that always an amazing thing that people are willing to do it. but i’m also very, very grateful because you know, with what we’ve been through, some of these experiences, we would’ve never been able to have without that. we just wouldn’t, and so you know, there’s definitely a huge element of gratefulness (teary). (parent) there was an underlying thread of profound gratitude among the parents of the children with cancer. this gratitude, i surmise, was about many things: for the camp itself, for their children being alive and able to participate, and even for the break from their daily lives and routines. it is the kind of gratitude that is possible, i believe, only when one is able to be truly present in a moment, aware of the finitude of life. tibetan buddhism calls this concept “impermanence,” and its doctrines teach of the value of impermanence, and the importance of accepting the impermanence of our lives. ask yourself these two questions: do i remember at every moment that i am dying, and everyone and everything else is, and so treat all beings at all times with compassion? has my understanding of death and impermanence become so keen and so urgent that i am devoting every second to the pursuit of enlightenment? if you can answer `yes' to both of these, then you have really understood impermanence. (sogyal rinpoche, 1993, p. 27) i propose that many parents of children with cancer have a sense of impermanence that fills their lives. even in the face of statistics, claiming (in some cases) greater than 80% survival rates, once parents hear the words “your child has cancer,” they are forced to face and consider their child’s mortality. impermanence is not a concept only for parents of children with cancer, of course. we are all aware, to varying degrees, that our lives are limited and that nothing, in a sense, is forever. however, in this age of advanced medical technology, our youth-obsessed western culture is not inclined to often consider this. to acknowledge impermanence is to acknowledge death, and it is well documented that we, as a culture, do not do this readily. bayer (2004) reported that, in the united states between the period of 1997 to 2001, cosmetic procelaing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 10 dures increased 311% for women, and 256% for men. western culture, bayer surmised, is doing nothing to dispel fears of aging and death; if anything it is promoting and perpetuating it by continuously and unrelentingly placing such high value on the retention of youth. likewise, berger (2008) noted that youth is not only associated with beauty and illusory perfection, but also with vitality, defined as “how healthy and energetic – physically, intellectually, and socially – an individual feels” (p. 546). considering this definition of vitality, it is not difficult to see why one would fear aging and death in a culture that idolizes youth. these parents, i believe, are acutely aware of the impermanence of their child, and it is perhaps this heightened sense of impermanence and awareness of the fragility of life, that causes gratitude to the degree in which i experienced it in them. in our journey, i haven’t had a lot of connection with other people who had kids with cancer so it was pretty neat for me to be able to talk to people and, and have that um, commonality. yeah. and camp itself – i could go on and on – just, the way we were treated, the quality of the counselors, the staff. the only, the only thing i can equate it to is a mini version of, you know, disneyland, or that kind of thing – disney’s motto of “the happiest place on earth.” i mean that’s how, that’s how they are, and ah, yeah, again when you’ve been through hard stuff, being treated like that is just – i can’t say i was shocked, but it sure felt good. (parent) knowing that something will not last can be of benefit. when something is pleasant, knowing it will not last helps us to not take it for granted, be present with it, and appreciate it in the moment. when something is unpleasant, knowing that it will not last can make it more bearable. it can help us to appreciate the good, having experienced the bad. in the buddhist tradition, impermanence is one of the essential doctrines, or three marks of existence. it is the practice of recognizing that everything changes, and nothing has a fixed identity, or permanence. those who subscribe to the buddhist doctrine strive to incorporate it into their lives, using it as an instrument to penetrate deeply into reality, understanding that reality is never static, but is dynamic throughout. the realization of impermanence is paradoxically the only thing we can hold onto, perhaps our only lasting possession. it is like the sky, or the earth. no matter how much everything around us may change or collapse, they endure. say we go through a shattering emotional crisis…our whole life seems to be disintegrating…our husband or wife suddenly leaves us without warning. the earth is still there; the sky is still there. of course, even the earth trembles now and again, just to remind us we cannot take anything for granted. (sogyal rinpoche, 1993, pp. 25-26) parents, i have suggested, are acutely aware (either consciously or sub-consciously) of the impermanence that affects us all, but for most is a concept ranging from uncomfortable to terrifying. hand in hand with this awareness, i suggest, comes gratitude, albeit often at a deeply subconscious level. johnson (2009) noted that impermanence can inspire gratitude by reminding us that we are part of a larger whole. it reminds us to live life fully, each moment never to be duplicated, and never knowing when the end of our lives may be. johnson suggested that impermanence can remind us of the absurdity of life, pushing us to find a healthy balance between intentional living and not taking life too seriously. i want to be careful not to romanticize this notion too much. i am not suggesting that parents of children with cancer just accept what has laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 11 happened with a “whatever happens, happens” kind of approach. on the contrary, i believe that the perspective of impermanence and the feelings of gratitude seep in through the cracks, perhaps, like as cohen (1992) suggested, “there is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in.” camp cracks the shell of fear around parents of children with cancer, allowing the light, the gratitude, to get in, and to help unlock emotions that may, perhaps, have been locked away from the moment of diagnosis. quite simply, it feels better to be grateful than to have no gratitude. camp offers the opportunity to feel gratitude and express gratefulness. being grateful of something is indicative of a certain level of emotional health, of healing. when one is consumed with fear or anger, or full of stress, it is impossible to make room for gratitude. it is perhaps the ability to feel grateful for something, that lets a parent know they can get through the nightmare of childhood cancer. gratitude unlocks the fullness of life. it turns what we have into enough, and more. it turns denial into acceptance, chaos into order, confusion into clarity...it turns problems into gifts, failures into success, the unexpected into perfect timing, and mistakes into important events. gratitude makes sense of our past, brings peace for today and creates a vision for tomorrow. (beattie, 2000, p. 9) concluding thoughts o body swayed to music, o brightening glance, how can we tell the dancer from the dance? (yeats, 1928) we are our stories, and like the dancer and the dance, in yeats’ poem, it is difficult to differentiate ourselves from our stories. our stories link our past to our present (france & uhlin, 2006), and allow us to reflect on our world (frank, 2000; king, 2003). stories allow us to assert meaning on events, “so, one may review past events through narration and say, ‘oh now i see,' as if it were the first time” (churchill & churchill, 1982, p. 73). the telling of stories has been demonstrated to increase resilience (dean, 1995), insight (jackson & mannix, 2003), and hardiness (leseho & block, 2005). we live by stories, we also live in them. one way or another we are living the stories planted – knowingly or unknowingly – in ourselves. we live stories that either give our lives meaning or negate it with meaninglessness. if we change the stories we live by, quite possibly we change our lives. (okri, 1997, p. 46). it is, perhaps, one of the greatest gifts that camp offers the children with cancer and their families – the space, time, and opportunity to tell their stories and to come to understand the meaning of childhood cancer differently. bios dr. catherine m. laing is an assistant professor in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 12 dr. nancy j. moules is a professor in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary. she also holds the alberta children’s hospital foundation and research institute nursing professorship in child and family centred cancer care. acknowledgement this doctoral study was funded by a generous scholarship from the alberta children’s hospital foundation to which the authors express immense gratitude. references abma, t.a. (2005). struggling with the fragility of life: a relational-narrative approach to ethics in palliative nursing. nursing ethics, 12(4), 337-348. doi:10.1191 /0969733005ne799oa abram, d. (1996). the spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world. new york, ny: vintage books. atkinson, r. (2002). the life story interview. in j. f. gubrium & j. a. holstein (eds.), handbook of interview research: context and method (pp. 121-140). thousand oaks, ca: sage. austergard, k. (2012). doing it the gadamerian way – using philosophical hermeneutics as a methodological approach in nursing science. scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 26(4), 829-834. retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca /store/doi/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00993.x bauman, z. (2004). wasted lives: modernity and its outcasts. cambridge, ma: polity press. bayer, k. (2004). the anti aging trend: capitalism, cosmetics and mirroring the spectacle. journal of communication, culture, and technology, 5, 1-19. retrieved from http://gnovisjournal.org/files/kathy-bayer-anti-aging-trend.pdf beattie, m. (2000). gratitude: affirming the good things in life. los angeles, ca: jacket flap books. benson, p.j. (1987). the relationship between self-concept and a summer camping program for children and adolescents who have cancer. journal of pediatric oncology nursing, 4(1-2), 42-43. doi:10.1177/104345428700400116 berger, k.s. (2008). the developing person: through the life span (7th ed.). new york, ny: worth publishers. binding, l.l., & tapp, d.m. (2008). human understanding in dialogue: gadamer’s recovery of the genuine. nursing philosophy, 9, 121-130. doi:10.1111/j.1466-769x.2007.00338.x laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 13 bluebond-langner, m., perkel, d., goertzel, t., nelson, k., & mcgeary, j. (1990). children’s knowledge of cancer and its treatment: impact of an oncology camp experience. the journal of pediatrics, 116(2), 207-213. doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82876-8 bosticco, c., & thompson, t.l. (2005). narratives and storytelling in coping with grief and bereavement. omega journal of death and dying, 51(1), 1-16. retrieved from http://baywood.com/journals /previewjournals.asp?id=0030-2228 bowles, n. (1995). storytelling: a search for meaning within nursing practice. nurse education today, 15(5), 365-369. doi:10.1016/s0260-6917 canadian association of pediatric oncology camps. (2012). about capoc. retrieved from http://www.cancer camps.ca/?q=node/34 carlick, a., & biley, f.c. (2004). thoughts on the therapeutic use of narrative in the promotion of coping in cancer care. european journal of cancer care, 13(4), 308-317. doi:10.1111 /j.1365-2354.2004.00466.x carpenter, p.j., sahler, o.j.z., & davis, m.s. (1990). use of a camp setting to provide medical information to siblings of pediatric cancer patients. journal of cancer education, 5(1), 21-26. doi:10.1080/08858199009528030 churchill, l.r., & churchill, s.w. (1982). storytelling in medical arenas: the art of selfdetermination. literature and medicine, 1, 73-79. doi:10.1353/lm.2011.0231 cohen l. (1992) anthem. on the future [cd]. columbia, ny. columbia records. connelly, f.m., & clandinin, d.j. (1990). stories of experience and narrative enquiry. educational researcher, 19(5), 2-14. retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/117600 crotty, m. (1998). the foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. london, ca: sage. dean, r.g. (1995). stories of aids: the use of narrative as an approach to understanding in an aids support group. clinical social work journal, 23(3), 287-304. doi:10.1007/ bf02191752 east, l., jackson, d., o’brien, l., & peters, k. (2010). storytelling: an approach that can help to develop resilience. nurse researcher, 17(3), 17-25. retrieved from http://nurseresearcher. rcnpublishing.co.uk france, c.m., & uhlin, b.d. (2006). narrative as an outcome domain in psychosis. psychology and psychotherapy: theory, research and practice, 29(1), 53-67. doi: 10.1348/1476083 05x41001 frank, a.w. (1995). the wounded storyteller: body, illness, and ethics. chicago, il: the university of chicago press. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 14 frank, a.w. (2000). the standpoint of storyteller. qualitative health research, 10(3), 354-365. doi:10.1177/104973200129118499 gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed., j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum (original work published 1960). grondin, j. (2003). the philosophy of gadamer (k. plant, trans.). montreal, qc, canada: mcgill-queens university press (original work published 1999). hattie, j., marsh, h., neill, j., & richards, g. (1997). adventure education and outward bound: out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference. review of educational research, 67(1), 43-87. retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 1170619 jackson, d., & mannix, j. (2003). mothering and women’s health: i love being a mother but... there is always something new to worry about. australian journal of advanced nursing, 20(3), 30-37. retrieved from http://www.ajan.com.au jardine, d.w. (2012). “the memories of childhood have no order and no end”: pedagogical reflections on the occasion of the release, on october 9, 2009, of the remastered version of the beatles’ sergeant pepper’s lonely hearts club band©. journal of applied hermeneutics. article 1. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/ 10515/sy5cv4c40 jardine, d.w., & clandinin, d.j. (1987). does it rain on vancouver island? teaching as storytelling. curriculum inquiry, 17(4), 471-481. retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/action/showpublication?journalcode=currinqu johnson, r. (2009). reclaiming your real self: a psychological and spiritual integration. charleston, sc: book surge. kessell, m., resnick, m.d., & blum, r.w.m. (1985). adventure, etc. – a health promotion program for chronically ill and disabled youth. journal of adolescent health care, 6, 433-438. doi:10.1016/s0197-0070(85)80048-6 kids cancer care foundation of alberta. (2012). retrieved from http://www.kidscancercare. ab.ca/kccf/camp_and_community.htm king, t. (2003). the truth about stories: a native narrative. toronto, on, canada: house of anansi press. kitzinger, c. (2004). feminist approaches. in c. seale, g. gobo, j.f. gubrium, & d. silverman (eds.), qualitative research practice (pp. 125-140). london, uk: sage. koch, t. (1996). implementation of a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing: philosophy, rigor, and representation. phenomenological research, 24(1), 174-184. doi:10.1046/ j.13652648.1996.17224.x laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 15 koch, t. (1998). storytelling: is it really research? journal of advanced nursing, 28(6), 11821190. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00853.x laing, c.m. (2012). in play, at play. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 6. http://jah.synergiesprairies.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/16/pdf laing, c.m. & moules, n.j. (2013). the island of misfit toys. journal of applied hermeneutics, august 5, 2013, article 8. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5js9hq4 laing, c.m. & moules, n.j. (in press). children’s cancer camps: a sense of community, a sense of family. journal of family nursing. leseho, j., & block, l. (2005). ‘listen and i tell you something’: storytelling and social action in the healing of the oppressed. british journal of guidance and counseling, 33(2), 175-184. doi:10.1080/03069880500132706 mishna, f., michalski, j., & cummings, r. (2002). camps as social work interventions: returning to our roots. social work with groups, 24(3/4), 153-171. doi: 10.1300/j009v24n03_11 mooney, b., & holt, d. (1996). the storyteller’s guide. little rock, ar: august house. moules, n.j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes – an ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods 1(3), article 1. retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/ ~ijqm/ moules, n.j., laing, c.m., mccaffrey, g., tapp, d.m., & strother, d. (2012). grandparents’ experiences of childhood cancer. part one: doubled and silenced. journal of pediatric oncology nursing, 29(3), 119-132. doi: 10.1177/1043454212439626 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., morck, a.c., & jardine, d.w. (2011). editorial: on applied hermeneutics and the work of the world. journal of applied hermeneutics, 1, editorial 1. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5d795p4 murray, j.s. (2001). self-concept of siblings of children with cancer. issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing, 24, 85-94. doi:10.1080/01460860116709 okri, b. (1997). a way of being free. london, uk: phoenix house. packman, w., mazaheri, m., sporri, l., long, j.k., chesterman, b, fine, j., & amylon, m.d. (2008). projective drawings as measures of psychosocial functioning in siblings of pediatric cancer patients from the camp okizu study. journal of pediatric oncology nursing, 25(1), 44-55. doi:10.1177/1043454207311915 ricoeur, p. (1981). hermeneutics and the human sciences: essays on language, action, and interpretation (j. b. thompson, trans.). new york, ny: cambridge university press. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 16 riley, t., & hawe, p. (2005). researching practice: the methodological case for narrative inquiry. health education research, 20(2), 226-236. doi:10.1093/ her/cyg122 rinpoche, s. (1993). the tibetan book of living and dying (rev. ed.). new york, ny: harper collins. rubin, h.j., & rubin, i.s. (2005). qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data (2nd ed.). thousand oaks, ca: sage. sandelowski, m. (1993). rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. advances in nursing science, 16(2), 1-8. retrieved from http://journals.lww. com/advancesinnursingscience/pages/default.aspx walker, d.a., & pearman, d. (2009). therapeutic recreation camps: an effective intervention for children and young people with chronic illness? archives of disease in childhood, 94(5), 395-402. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.145631 welch, m.j., carlson, a.m., larson, d., & fena, p. (2007). clinical profile, health-related quality of life, and asthma control in children attending us asthma camps. annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology, 99(6), 496-501. doi:org.ezproxy.lib. ucalgary.ca/10.1016/s10811206(10)60377-8 wellisch, d.k., crater, b., wiley, f.m., belin, t.r., & weinstein, k. (2006). psychosocial impacts of a camping experience for children with cancer and their siblings. psycho-oncology, 15, 56-65. doi:10.1002/pon.922 widdershoven, g. (1993). the story of life: hermeneutic perspectives on the relationship between narrative and life history. in a. lieblich & r. josselson (eds.), the narrative study of lives (pp. 1–20). thousand oaks, ca: sage. wiltshire, j. (1995). telling a story, writing a narrative: terminology in health care. nursing inquiry, 2(2), 75-82. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.1995.tb00145.x yeats, w.b. (1928). among the school children. retrieved from http://www.poemhunter. com/poem/among-school-children/ microsoft word kostouros corrected proof.docx corresponding author: patricia kostouros, phd email: pkostouros@mtroyal.ca journal of applied hermeneutics june 9, 2013 the author(s) 2013 my father was not my father: an attempted understanding through a ricoeurian lens patricia kostouros abstract in my phd studies, i was honoured to have been introduced to the scholar paul ricoeur, whose work became central to my dissertation topic. in this paper, i share the ways in which ricoeur’s conceptualizations of hermeneutic application to the human existence came to life for me. i use an existential event, discovering non-biological parentage, to bring forth my understanding of these concepts. ricoeur’s solicitation of the hermeneutic practice allowed me to see family events in a new light. it is my hope through my application of ricoeur’s work that others will interpret existential life events in new and exciting ways. keywords narrative-identity, ricoeur, self-understanding, temporality my other earliest memory is vague, no more than a distant feeling that i can sometimes seize, most often not. being so dimly remembered, perhaps it came first. i became aware of a voice inside my head. what is this, i wondered. who are you, voice? when will you shut up? i remembered a feeling of fright. it was only later that i realized that this voice was my own thinking, that this moment of anguish was my first inkling that i was a ceaseless monologue trapped within myself. taken from self, by yann martel, 1996 early in my life, i became aware of the narratives about my biological parentage. being the only blonde, blue-eyed, small person in our family, people often wondered if my father was actually my father. since i looked somewhat like my mother, it was only his contribution that was in question. at some point, around the age of four or five years, i remember my older sister telling me i was kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 2 adopted. while i tried hard not to believe her, there were signs everywhere that this narrative may actually be true. occasionally, i would ask my parents if this was actual, and typically, they would reassure me that i was fully theirs. to allay my concerns my father would tell me stories of how the greeks were originally blonde and blue-eyed until turkey invaded. hence, my “difference” was attributed to a recessive gene. i do not recall that these stories ever dispelled my suspicion; a simple glance at my family could easily confirm the concerns i expressed. my suspicions lingered throughout my life and eventually lead to a candid conversation with my father in my adulthood, prior to his death. at some point before my father died, he confided in me that my mother had had an affair and that i may not actually be his child. my relationship with my father had been rocky until i spent more time with him as an adult before he died. when he confirmed my existing suspicion, we decided that, biological or not, he was my father, a man i had come to know and admire. i put the biological parentage issue out of my mind for several years thereafter. however, after my mother died, i had regretted that i had not questioned her about the potential that my father was not my father and that i have a parent that may or may not know i exist. i suppose i hesitated discussing this with my mother because i typically found myself in an in-between space of already knowing but not wanting to confirm. perhaps the decision that, regardless of biology, he was my father was made more for him than me. perhaps the lingering childhood signs would not be eclipsed. after thinking long and hard, and being encouraged by my partner, i decided to have dna testing complete in order to give me a more solid answer. it was not so much a desire to find a biological father but rather to confirm what i already felt at times as a child; like i was tolerated, rather than i belonged. since my father had already passed away, i had to request a dna sample from my brother. my brother asked that i share the results, and knowing my family, if i shared with one, i shared with everyone. i agreed to share whatever information came my way. we retrieved dna samples, submitted them to the laboratory, and then waited patiently for the results. the letter finally arrived and i anxiously read the statistical analysis, thinking “okay, okay, but what does all this mean?!” finally, after synthesising the data there was my answer: only a .058 probability of full sibling-ship, likelihood “probability of relatedness, maternal half-siblings.” so it was confirmed, my father was not my father. my initial reaction was that this information should not really change anything. i already had an inkling about the results; however, i did start to hesitate when people would ask me about my last name and its origin. i would be pulled up short by questions about my heritage and often felt caught between answering that my father was greek, and being more reticent in my response, since i now know my father was not my father. the dna testing results created a watershed moment of understanding self and the narratives that existed about my heritage and in particular, being a blonde greek. i also began to wonder about whether my biology should or would trump the narratives i hold of being greek. how do i understand myself now, in light of this new information? does this new information change my attestations? do the years i spent thinking i was greek suddenly vanish or do they continue to reside inside me? does this existential event add to or limit my selfunderstanding? how might paul ricoeur’s theory explain this experience and the narrative self? in my address of these questions, i will bring to light ricoeur’s conceptualizations, while using my own experiences as a thread kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 3 that weaves these concepts together. i must confess however, that given the depth and breadth of ricoeur’s work, my ability to synthesize his theory and my experiences within these pages will be limited. ricoeur’s work offers a starting place for engaging the questions that surfaced for me as i confronted this new information. besides highlighting ricoeur’s concepts and the links to my selfunderstanding, what i present are the thoughts and questions that were raised as i searched ricoeur’s work for direction, some of which still linger unrequited. why use ricoeur’s hermeneutics? as i am now faced with the knowledge that my father was not my father, i am struck by the opportunity that this affords me. while the entire narrative about my background is not false, this event has fractured an existing narrative about who i am and how i came to be. ricoeur offers an interpretive slant that considers both self and others as well as time. for ricoeur (1992), hermeneutics, or interpretation, takes place indirectly and dialectically, by encountering symbols (reference that provide a detour) which are interpreted, reflected upon, and incorporated into the self. i had conflicting information as a child. i had the signs and symbols that i did not belong; after all i looked different. however, i also had dialogue from my parents that contradicted these signs. hermeneutics in general is known as an interpretive approach to a topic that allows the opening up of the world around us and to uncover and seek an understanding of the ways in which we live, engage and experience this world (gadamer, 2004). i needed a hermeneutic approach to interpreting the new and the old and integrate the new into an enlarged self-understanding. in his book oneself as another, ricoeur (1992) asked, “what sort of being is the self” (p. 297)? by asking this question, ricoeur took a critical twist in which he posited that knowing the self can only be accomplished through encountering one’s own self as well as others “that the selfhood of oneself implies otherness to such an intimate degree that one cannot be thought of without the other” (p. 3). by this statement, ricoeur (1992) referred to the otherness of the self. we belong and live communally and, therefore, we come into contact with others (other than self) in the world who inform us, and act as a mediating force, which could potentially create change in the self, as well as our ethical actions in the world (ricoeur, 1992). however, this mediating force is best accomplished when faced with difference; “as long as one remains within the circle of sameness-identity, the otherness of the other than self offers nothing original” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 3). i was clearly faced with difference in my family, but the narratives, which had a historical grounding, acted as a gatekeeper to further inquiry. ricoeur’s (1998) idea of self differs from the objectivist ontological stance; that is, things outside of us exist independently. instead, ricoeur (1992) understood that we are bound by the conditions around us and that these conditions create the perceptions of self and others and, therefore, we are created narrations. i bought the family narratives, for the most part, because i could then say i belonged, even if thoughts otherwise lingered. additionally, i could take up his work because ricoeur (1988) differed from others in his thinking about “being” in that he attempted to deal fully with the notion of time and its connection to our lived experience, and in order to understand time, we must understand time as an experience. since the chronology of time does not speak to our experiences of time, ricoeur’s ontological curve examined temporal experiences in particular, the language of time, for example in my wondering about the dna results, “it didn’t matter at the time,” or “i wonder now.” the way we take kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 4 the language of time and narrate our selfunderstanding was critical in ricoeur’s later work, according to most ricoeur scholars (e.g., andrew, 2001; hall, 2007; kearney, 2004; langdridge, 2004; mccarty, 2007; muldoon, 2002; 2006; pellauer, 2007). i understood myself as a blonde greek, my father disclosed information that increased my suspicions, but at the time of his disclosure, it did not matter. using language such as “then” and “now” allow our narratives to move through time. furthermore, ricoeur’s ontological shift about time related to moving from the “what” of time to the “who” experiences time. in doing so, ricoeur was able to link time and self to narratives. existential events “thus the imagined nothingness of the self becomes the existential crisis of the self.” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 168) i have identified the dna testing and the results i received as an existential event. i have done so because of what the event offered me. in some respects, this event has given me the opportunity to reinvent myself; to change my narrative, if you will. for example, i had already experienced a very challenging, difficult, and therefore, non-existent relationship with my older sister, and a rather disappointing relationship with my brother so when i received the results of my dna test, part of me was elated that i was not fully connected to these siblings. on the other hand, i never wanted my older sister to be right about me not being a “real” member of the family, and i was always trying to prove that i did belong. what would happen to everything for which i fought? my attestations were false, she was right, where does that leave me in terms of this family, since we no longer have parents to mediate the divide? i must consider that i cannot simply dismiss my past, since these family and cultural narratives contributed to how i came to be who i am now. according to ricoeur (1980), “no authentic anticipation of what we ‘may have to be’ is possible without borrowing from the resources of what we already ‘have been’” (p. 181). i was encountering difference in my family of origin. i have always been different from them. i have the opportunity now to own my difference, yet maintain some family narratives since these too exist. the term existential (n.d.) can be traced back to the work of kierkegaard and essentially means conditions of existence, and is an occurrence. perhaps, then, an existential event is one that “happens to us over and above our wanting and doing” (gadamer, 2004, p. xxvi). ricoeur (1984) described an event as something mediated and constrained. our experiences happen to us but they are temporal in that a subjective perception of an event will be dependent on our past and the appropriation of that event will influence our future. risser (1986) stated that the hermeneutic interpretation of event or experience starts from one’s perception and, in particular, suggested that once we experience something we cannot experience it again in the same way because “the experience changes the experiencer” (p. 44). how i as an experiencer might perceive an event will depend on prior conditioning. even though i was told i was a blonde greek, there were enough signs saying otherwise that made it possible for me to take up the dna testing. remembering that, according to ricoeur (1998), we are always “en route,” when we experience an event, our history, culture, and language will therefore be determined by some of what we perceive. being true to ricoeur, however, means that one must recognize that these perceptions are mediated through language, or rather, “all discourse is produced as an event...but understood as meaning” (p. 167). my sister’s accusations that i was kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 5 adopted eventually coupled with my father’s disclosure, produced the event of dna testing. a shaky foundation of self and belonging in this family already existed, but early on could be countered by attestations from my mother and father. receiving the results that i was not biologically related to my father answered for me some questions about our past relationship, but at the same time, my former perceptions of family began to crumble. ricoeur (2004a) referred to discourse as an event because it is referencing something “in the intention of saying something about something to someone: speaking is the act by which language moves beyond itself as a sign toward its reference and toward what it encounters” (p. 82). in other words, discourse, the use of language, is action. additionally, ricoeur (1984) wedded events and narratives in that one depends on the other since they cannot be mutually exclusive; an event will exist because it is narrated, and a narration exists because of the event. in particular, narratives are received and, therefore, narratives are always open for another’s interpretation of the narration. my sister’s accusations – you don’t belong; my emphatic protests – i belong. my attestations as a child of belonging however would only go so far since there were constant references otherwise, i don’t look like them. finally, ricoeur (1992) viewed human actions as similar to a text that can be interpreted. my father’s disclosure, an action; is this a space for interpretation of past events? ricoeur (1984) saw the usefulness of structuralism in the task of hermeneutic interpretation since structuralism assists with revealing the hidden structures in language and in recovering meaning. while language is primary to ricoeur’s hermeneutics, he does not subscribe to linguistics as a primary mode of analysis. rather, ricoeur stated that text, or discourse, “says something about something” (p. 78) and that references open up the world and our existence in the world. we rescue meaning by attending to the language used, and we interpret by attending to what language points toward. the dna results pointed to a truth. even though these results are definitive, it is possible to find meaning in my family experiences in a greek household. do these results have to unravel everything i understood about myself? in ricoeur’s (2004b) discussion about the intention of hermeneutics in relation to the interpretation of “every meaningful discourse” (p. 4), he stated: in fact, meaningful discourse is hermeneia, “interprets” reality, precisely to the degree that it says something of something. moreover, discourse is hermeneia because a discursive statement is a grasp of the real meaningful expression, not a selection of so-called impressions coming from the things themselves. (p. 4) in other words, we comprehend and make meaning of that which is in front of us which may open up existential possibilities. why didn’t my father support my extra-curricular activities? why would he look at me that ways sometimes? why would he leave the room? perhaps i have been given the opportunity to interpret family interactions in new ways, with a new understanding of my otherness. perhaps it is hard to pretend, when you believe that the child is not yours. i fondly recall the family talks we had at the kitchen table. my father would frequently make sunday dinners and we would sit afterwards and talk for hours. that is where i learned about the digestive usefulness of grand marnier, that anita bryant was an “idiot,” and that the boston bruins were the best hockey team in the nhl. these conversations, or discourses, were always about something, kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 6 and they laid down a foundation for how i take up the world today and shaped how i accepted or rejected my past. for example, while i am not a hockey fan, i do drink grand marnier. more importantly, i began to narrate the political world and my actions in it, based on these discourses around that kitchen table. one cannot simply narrate or frame, but, according to ricoeur (1998), context affects meaning, and thereby how and where the narration takes place and what the narration is about matters. in a dialogue about interpretation, ricoeur (1998) explained that, “sensitivity to context is the necessary complement” (p. 44). i do not look like them. ricoeur (1974) was clear to point out that “language is innocent – language meaning the tool, the code – because it does not speak, it is spoken” (p. 91). if narrative matters, as kearney (2004) argued in support of ricoeur’s position, then what we do with a narrative should also matter. therefore, the narrator, not just the narration itself, is in need of consideration since the narrator is an acting agent, a “who.” my father was an acting agent when he disclosed my mother’s affair. i was the acting agent requesting the dna test. i knew that taking this step would result in solidifying or fragmenting my self-understanding as a family member and could further unravel the sibling relationships. in taking up the focus on the concept of the “what” of the event, ricoeur (1992) reminded us that a “what” also has a “who,” and a “why.” in particular, during ricoeur’s reflections on selfhood, he expressed the importance of the “who” by talking about something that matters and distinguishing the differences between what and who, that is, “how can we ask ourselves what matters if we could not ask to whom the thing mattered or not? does not the questioning about what matters or not depend upon self-concern, which indeed seems to be constitutive of self-hood” (ricoeur 1992, p. 137)? at the time i decided biological or not, he was my father...i regretted not asking...how do i understand myself now in light of this new information? it is important to discuss intentionality in relation to this existential event since it connects ricoeur’s theory and the way in which existential events create or limit possibilities for self-understanding. when deliberating about intention, ricoeur (1992) referred to the importance of the “what” and “who” of action. ricoeur (2004b) stated that interpretation has an intention to match reader, “who,” and text “what,” “thereby incorporating its meaning into the present comprehension a man is able to have of himself” (p. 4). ricoeur would likely say that we know ourselves through our actions and our actions lead us toward selfnarration. narrating events narration, according to ricoeur (1984), involves emplotment; the making of an event into a story. a plot has a direction and according to ricoeur (1998), “an event must be more than a singular occurrence: it must be defined in terms of its contribution to the development of a plot” (p. 277). ricoeur (1984) described the importance of the plot having direction so that we follow along and by doing so we are able to make meaning of the story being narrated, in particular, to reflect upon the story, and to integrate the meaning made into our own existence and human action. however, ricoeur (1984) was also clear to point out that “emplotment is never the simple triumph of order” (p. 73). while my life has had a direction forward, it is in the backward glance to events along the way, the way he looks at me, my sister’s attestations, you may not be my child, that prompted the action of requesting a dna test which then leads to a continuation of the plot; the fragkostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 7 menting of my self-understating and reinventing myself. in his discussion of aristotle’s poetics, ricoeur (1984) described the art of composing as “organizing the events into a system” (p. 33) or, in other words, a plot or “muthos” (p. 31). since historical events are constructed narratives (ricoeur, 1988), the historian or narrator interprets that event and therefore, historical accounts, for example, turkey invaded greece, are not the same as natural events such as earthquakes. these historical accounts weave through our personal narratives to augment the plot we are creating about who we are and how we belong, greeks were once blonde and blue eyed; i should believe them. ricoeur (1992) recognized the opportunity for narrations to highlight human potential, and the possibilities for action. narratives assist in mediating events across time thereby creating a meaningful whole and recognition that reality may be temporal. my narrative as a greek existed temporarily and was established only through discourse; the signs said otherwise. ricoeur’s (1984) ideas about narrative took up history and fiction, both of which involve time. fictional narratives may draw on actual events, and they are representations of such. historical narratives may involve the recounting of empirical events (ricoeur, 1984). in order for historical events, for example, to be appropriately narrated it must remain in its context and contribute to a plot (ricoeur, 1984). ricoeur (1998; 2004c) argued that historical accounts are narrative in that they account for real events and those narratives that accompany them. in particular, ricoeur (1998) stated, “however fictional the historical text may be it claims nevertheless to be a representation of reality. in other words history is both a literary artefact (and in this sense a fiction) and a representation of reality” (p. 291). turkey really did invade greece hence my blondeness. the reality however, is that i am not an offspring of this greek man. ricoeur (1984) suggested that the past is only accessible to us through our narratives since “when it was present, this past was like our present, confused, multiform, and unintelligible” (p. 99). therefore, “there is only a history of the potentialities of the present” (ricoeur, 1998, p. 295). the present reality affords me the opportunity to reinvent my future identity to re-narrate myself. the narrated self we can see how ricoeur’s thinking about temporality affects the narrative self and the ways in which time folded upon itself, reflecting back, can create a discordant-concordant dynamic. in particular, entering into a discussion about the way in which we come to have stability as a narrated self through time, ricoeur (1992) distinguished the identity as having an ipse-identity and an idem-identity. he pointed out that these two parts are not necessarily found on a continuum, from one end of identity to the other, but rather contribute in different ways to an identity. additionally, he claimed that these two parts of the self both depart yet intersect and endure through time. narrative identity lies between ipse and idem identity and is mediated by them and links actions and ethics with identity since “there is no ethically neutral narrative” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 115). the ipse, also called selfhood (ricoeur, 1992), is the part of the self that is a reflexive being and has self-constancy. the term constancy in this context does not relate to a static composition but rather a self that is carried forward through time, thereby weaving through horizons of the past, present and future and through interpretations and reinterpretations. in my case, as an example, having thought i was greek sits in the past, now that i know my father is not my father. kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 8 how i bring the dna results into my present and future is a matter of how i might interpret what father means, or what it means to have been brought up in a greek household. ipse is also defined by ricoeur as one’s bond or making and keeping a promise. i shared the results of the dna testing as i said i would. in other words, the ipse relates to the human activities that are maintained as a claiming of the self to the self. for example, in relation to keeping one’s word, ricoeur (1992) explained that the ipse appears to “stand as a challenge to time, a denial of change” (p. 124), since keeping one’s word or promise is done so regardless of time or circumstances. a promise speaks to the esteem we give ourselves and to others, and recognizes that language is the place where we extend ourselves to others through time. ipse, therefore, is anchored in the presence of an other than self, since it is related to our actions. i shared the results of the dna testing. according to ricoeur (1992), it is at this juncture that ipse and idem depart. the idem, what ricoeur (1992) also called sameness, differs from the ipse in that the idem relates to the continuity of an individual’s dimensions over time. while there may be some changes over time to these features, they will always maintain some permanence; that is, time could be said to “threaten resemblance without destroying it” (ricoeur, p. 117). it was important for ricoeur to move beyond the mind-body dichotomy, where identity was concerned. idem, or personal identity, is not strictly substance, such as brain or body continuity, for example, i am blonde and blue eyed, but is also related to traits or habits that become incorporated into the self to the point where one is recognizable as the same through actions. ricoeur called the idem the “’what’ of the ‘who’” (p. 122). i am tentative with my older sister and always have been. according to ricoeur (1992), both idem and ipse have constancy, permanency in time, and while separate, they may overlap. ricoeur described that the ipse and idem sometimes overlap, and “this overlapping, however, does not abolish the difference separating the two problematics: precisely as second nature, my character is me, myself, ipse; but this ipse announces itself as idem” (p. 121). at the same time, however, these parts of our identity are separate, in that “keeping one’s word expresses a self-constancy which cannot be inscribed as character was…the perseverance of character is one thing, the perseverance of faithfulness to a word that has been given is something else again” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 123). since the ipse and idem are “two modes of being” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 308), they must find an accord, in that, the constancy of one relies on the constancy of the other, and, through contracting with one another the ipse and idem negotiate the narrated, capable self. at the time, since i was appreciating the adult relationship i had gained with my father, it did not matter if he was biologically connected or not. over time this changed for me. i had to negotiate between completing the dna testing and potentially breach my word, regardless you are my father, or if i my own curiosity, spurred by my never-ending suspicion, was honouring my need for selfunderstanding. time was also a factor since my brother was ill. negotiating the idem and ipse was necessary for my plot to continue. in a discussion about the “capable self,” ricoeur (1992) pulled in the concept of reflexivity and explained that our reflexive nature allows us to ask questions about identity, that is, the “who.” what does it mean now that i know i am not greek? does this information have to disintegrate my selfunderstanding? one of the ways in which ricoeur suggested that we know we persist through time is through such activities as speaking, action, and responsibility. there is a kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 9 certainty about our existence, which ricoeur called “attestation.” essentially, attestation refers to one’s ability to attest to his or herself and to the ability to be responsible for that declaration. i do belong; you may not be my child. ricoeur reminded us that, whatever we attest to, be it the world or self, attestation is mediated. the narrated self is fragile (ricoeur 1992). according to ricoeur, since we are narrating ourselves on both actual and constituted experiences, we are always becoming and constantly refiguring ourselves. however, by using either fiction or historical accounts, we are able to uncover meaning and transform ourselves. attestation helps us decide about conflicting accounts of the narrative self (ricoeur, 1992). to what can we attest? if i am confused, are there facts that i can orient myself toward that will assist with the conflict and, therefore, assist with settling on a particular narrative? i am blonde, i am not greek. i don’t look like him, he is not my father. nevertheless, according to ricoeur (1998), in order to attest, these facts or narratives must be acceptable and plausible. turkey did invade greece, could my difference be the result of a recessive gene? temporality, narrative, and action “...time becomes human to the extent that it is articulated through a narrative mode, and narrative attains its full meaning when it becomes a condition of temporal existence.” (ricoeur, 1984, p. 52) narratives or stories are the ways in which we make sense of temporality, that is, “the world unfolded by every narrative work is a temporal world” (ricoeur, 1984, p. 3). we are able to describe human actions through mimesis, a pre-figuring, configuring and refiguring of actions based on what has gone before, how we interpret the past, and where it takes us. we bring the past into the present to inform us and therefore, create narratives. in order to illuminate narrative activity and temporality, ricoeur (1984) described a “three-fold mimesis” (p. 52), which included mimesis1, mimesis2 and mimesis3. mimesis1 (pre-figuration) refers to our pre-understandings of practical action. three layers lie within memisis1 including the structural use of language in that language assists with the understanding of action. a second layer relates to the ways in which symbols assist in narrations, and the ways in which contexts will inform narrations. i don’t look like them, maybe my sister is right. finally, actions have a temporal nature as seen in the language of adverbs, for example, “now,” i am not greek, and “then” i am greek. mimesis2 (configuration) acts as a mediating role between memisis1 and memisis3 and assists the reader in following a plot. a plot then becomes configured when this mediating function “transforms the events or incidents into a story” (ricoeur, 1984, p. 65). emplotment refers to the ways in which we organize, or configure, activities into a plot. i was greek, i am not greek anymore. where does all my understanding as a greek now reside? finally, mimesis3 (re-figuration) refers to the ways in which a reading or interaction could influence a change or re-figure our being-in-the-world and allow possibilities to arise. what will i tell my grandchildren about their lineage? ricoeur (1984) explained that these forms of mimesis provide a creative tension that work together to relate time to narrative and create human time. in essence, ricoeur showed how these forms depend on one another in both time and narrative, in that “we are following therefore the destiny of a prefigured time that becomes a refigured time through the mediation of a configured time” (p. 54). concerned that he may be creating a vicious circle, ricoeur dealt with this dilemkostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 10 ma by discussing the transitory functions between the forms, or mimesis. while recognizing that the circular nature of narrative and time do not stop, ricoeur stated, “i would rather speak of an endless spiral that would carry the mediation past the same point a number of times, but at different altitudes” (p. 72). ricoeur’s (1984, 1985, 1988) work in his three volumes of time and narrative illustrated that historical accounts are more than facts since they are constructed and narrated events. narratives allow us to make sense of ourselves, and by organizing our life events into a plot, we humanize time that might otherwise become “fragmented moments” (kearney, 2002, p. 4). according to ricoeur (1988), time becomes humanized because we narrate and, therefore, we move time from the cosmos and merge with it into our lives. emplotment changes chronological time into relationships between humans and time and in particular, the beginning, middle, and end (not necessarily in that order) of a narration creates temporality, while at the same time it helps create unity. ricoeur (1985) suggested that narratives allow us to play with time, for example, our use of verb tenses. i have a father, i had a father, i am greek, i was greek. we are acting agents in human time, and our actions will leave its mark on historical time, which could then be brought into the future. my father’s disclosure, i opted for dna testing, and i will never be greek. we need chronological time in order to make sense of past and new experiences, to provide them a place in time, after my father’s death. the lived present allows us to have new beginnings, possibilities, and the “narrative identity continues to make and unmake itself” (ricoeur, 1988, p. 249). i can take up ricoeur’s linking of time and narrative, and unapologetically reconstruct a past narrative and change the mark i leave in historical time. ricoeur (1980) spoke of the telling and retelling of a story or narrative as one of the connections we have with temporality. for example, in the telling of a story he discussed the structure of a narrative as having a beginning, middle, and an end (ricoeur, 1980). when a plot is structured in such a way, there is what he called a “then” an “and then,” or a “so on” (ricoeur, 1980, p. 179), which are the connecting episodes that involve both plot (narrative) and time (and then). in this way, we follow along in present cosmic time even though a story may itself take place at different time. greece was invaded, that is why you are blonde. when a story is re-told, it changes its place in cosmic time. now the story has a history because of the recollecting that takes place. ricoeur (1980) suggested that the function of a narrative is related to human actions and that our actions lead to narratives that become temporal structures. in essence, ricoeur (1988) suggested, “we are affected by history and that we affect ourselves by the history we make” (p. 213). greece was invaded and therefore fewer blondes, but i see the differences in how you treated me, i want to know, i will do the testing, i am not yours. in relation to narratives and plots, ricoeur (1984, 1985, 1992) described a dynamic process involving concordant and discordant elements, that is, the arrangements of fact and reversals of fortune within a story. my sister was right. in much the same way, we construct our own stories and act as the characters within that story. i want to know for sure; my suspicions will not abate. we follow a plot and, through time, we weave the events that take place in our lives into a meaningful whole. i was a sibling and i am now a halfsibling. plot and character are dynamic elements of a narrative and “it is the identity of the story that makes the identity of the character” (ricoeur, 1992, p.148); however, these elekostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 11 ments must be credible. essentially, the character acts and is acted upon, and we evaluate the actions of the character, and in so doing we identify with the character and the story. ricoeur (1992) believed that human lives are readable, and are even more readable when the stories people tell of themselves are told through historical or fictional narratives, which, in turn, are interpreted into our own lives. the stories my father told me about greece being invaded were historical narratives which allowed an interpretation of greeks being blonde and blue eyed. therefore, i did belong, i was greek. these narratives of life are never complete, however (ricoeur, 1988), until the story is over. i’m going to die, you need to know, i may not be your father. ricoeur (1992) recognized also that our narratives are not created in a vacuum; we are enmeshed in prior stories and tradition along with others. we encounter others, within a cultural context and these interactions contribute to our own narratives. they say i am greek, i don’t look like them, i don’t want to be adopted, i want to belong. these interactions assist us in determining our actions. protests, asking parents. our narratives start to weave with those of others, and we create stories about our shared identity. i reflect on those discussions at the kitchen table. for example, my narrative is constituted by the fact that i am a sibling and have been told stories about what that means. additionally, we have a heritage. this heritage is constituted through historical narratives, having been told through the ages, for example, the way in which a father is taken up in a particular culture. therefore, the changes i encountered about the biology of my father becomes existential because of the meanings passed down, from not only my own family, but these meanings are also encapsulated in the narratives that have been told about fathers for centuries, for example, myths, particularly those stemming from a greek culture. we are affected by our past that is not created by us; we have a picture of the present mediated through our cultural landscapes. however, our actions throw us into the future and in doing so we potentially change ourselves. i have done the testing, i am not greek. we become actors in the world, while being constituted by our past; however, we also have freedom (ricoeur, 1992). all narratives, whether real or fictional, according to ricoeur (1992), have some ethical element. for ricoeur (1992), our human actions are located in time and space, and while time and space may act as a constraint, these root us and enable us to view a persistent self. additionally, ricoeur (1998) suggested that we recognize ourselves and take responsibility for our actions through self-examination. if i didn’t want the answer why did i do the testing? in short, ricoeur (1998) said that we learn about ourselves through acts that are exterior to the self, which then return to us, with information, through others or symbols. we then take that information, evaluate it, and examine it to determine meaning. does parental lineage matter? acting agents and human capability throughout ricoeur’s (1992) work, there is reference to an agent’s acting and suffering “for my part, i will never forget to speak of humans as acting and suffering” (p. 145). suffering comes from the misery experienced when the self is not yet realised, but it is seen in potential for action (hall, 2007). according to ricoeur (1988), we find axial moments, which give structure to time and connect us to events in historical time, moments that have left a trace, and “to follow a trace is one way of ‘reckoning with time’” (p.124). in order to “reckon with time,” we give utterance to events, and in particular speak of actions. actions move what is potential toward actuality. i may not be your father; my brother is ill, i should do the testing; i am not his. kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 12 actions leave a mark in time, a trace, much like a text is archived, and therefore, according to ricoeur (1992), human action can be interpreted. why didn’t my parents tell me? why did my father wait until he was close to death? why didn’t i ever ask my mother about my biological father? our actions, or inactions, can be interpreted. perhaps my mother’s guilt kept her from telling me; perhaps my father had a part to play in her affair; perhaps it did not matter to him either until we had a better relationship. actions, according to ricoeur (1992), can be studied “following a three-step rhythm: describing, narrating, prescribing” (p. 20). essentially, this process assists in moving from practice to ethics since prescribing involves judgment, “good” or “bad.” through narratives, we have received models or descriptions of how to act; through reading or dialogue we access our imagination and apply that to the real world and, therefore, we can act. my father was a generous man; it would not be outside of his character to welcome a child that was not his, even if i was a reminder for him of my mother’s infidelity. distanciation and appropriation in order to judge one’s act, or to examine one’s self, there needs to be a certain amount of distance. ricoeur (1992, 1998) used the term distanciation to describe the act of objectifying a text (or discourse, or self) in order for it to be liberated. once distanced, interpretation is no longer tied to the original intent and, therefore, can be brought forward to be made meaningful to the person in the present. it is not what the statistical analysis of dna results mean, but rather what they mean to me given my past and present, and what it means about my heritage. in the process of experiencing and interpreting an event, it is not necessarily the event that endures, but the meaning and “the interpretation becomes an event” (ricoeur, 1998, p. 185). what does having a father mean and what does having a greek father mean? in his discussion in relation to distanciation and appropriation, ricoeur (1998) explained that we do not “impose” ourselves on a text, but rather we “expose” ourselves in order to discover a “proposed” world (pp. 142-143). as we distanciate the original intention of the text, we expose ourselves, use our imagination (reflect), and we invite “new possibilities of being-in-the-world” (ricoeur, 1998, p. 142) and we become an enlarged self. while distance frees meaning, appropriation allows us to make the meaning familiar. in particular, ricoeur claimed that “distanciation, in all its forms and figures, constitutes par excellence the critical moment in understanding” (p. 113). action much of ricoeur’s (1984, 1985, 1988, 1998) work on narrative relates to the way in which we interact with a text. as we read, we also re-read ourselves through the varied characters and the plots. we evaluate the character’s actions and potentially “elevate them to the rank of persons” (ricoeur, 1985, p. 41). much like the reading of a novel, we respond to the people in our lives in similar ways. we interpret the actions of others and attend to the social and public spheres. inherent in our ability to be an acting agent is our corporeality. my body interacts in the world, and i have a “corporeal anchoring in the world” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 150.). human capacity is conditional since the body will be either active or passive depending on needs or desires and interactions with others (hall, 2007; muldoon, 2002). i could have chosen not to complete the dna testing and accepted a state of not knowing. our needs or desires have the potential to direct activity, while our bodily senses ground our existence in the world. furthermore, according to ricoeur (as kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 13 cited in kearney, 2004), our perceptions are subject to emotions. because of the early childhood distance i perceived our relationship in a certain way. as i got to know my father, as an adult, i became more emotionally connected. had i remained emotionally distant, the dna results may not have spurred me to wonder existentially about what it means to have been brought up greek, with a greek father. accordingly, our openness to the world and our ability to interpret and engage will depend on our affective perception. am i sad or happy about the dna results? affective perceptions will either open us to a world of possibility or limit openness due to vulnerability. i have a new understanding of being a half-sibling. i resent my sister for being right, and i will likely avoid her in the future. our freedom is revealed through our character. apparently, ricoeur (as cited in muldoon, 2002) believed that we want to represent our ideal self and strive toward happiness. the desire for happiness leads to our perception of possibilities for our human capacity (ricoeur, 1992). happiness, however, being an emotion, may be in conflict with reason and, therefore, contributes to our frailty. while we are cognizant of our frailty and we may feel misery because of it, these conditions, lead us to actions, and a will to respond. does the biology of my father matter? should i do the testing? what do i understand about myself now that i know i am not greek and only partially related to this family? what does it mean to be without a cultural lineage? ricoeur’s (1992) work pointed to the importance of choices and actions in the world with others. we exist with others and, our interactions with others can inform us when we reflect on our human capacity. narratives help us mediate within our public spaces. engagement with others is key to our selfhood (ricoeur, 1992), and narratives direct our action to live communally. what should i tell others when they ask about the origin of my last name? others can assist in attestations and verify truths. my brother’s dna is unlike my own. on the other hand, others could provide a different perspective. you are our child. self-understanding “...reflection is nothing without the mediation of signs and works, and the explanation is nothing if not incorporated as an intermediary stage in the process of self-understanding.” (ricoeur, 1998, p. 159). the past and present confront one another and merge together, and as we interpret the past, we bring new meaning made into the present, which leads to an increased selfunderstanding. self-understanding is mediated through reflection, and “the self of selfknowledge is the fruit of an examined life” (ricoeur, 1988, p. 247). when we reflect not only on ourselves but also on the community in which we live, we attest to ourselves about who we are and how we live. the external environment, our community or culture will validate this attestation, which over time will also lead to self-constancy. existential events offer opportunities for a re-reading of the self when examined for the ways in which narratives have shaped both the self and the interpretation of the events. existential events create a temporality of experience. time becomes humanized in the way that we respond to our history, bring it into the present and in consideration of the future. while engaged in this self-examination we may stay true to ourselves; however, we may also critique the narratives that have created who we are now, and through the dialect between present understanding and potential, we may become refigured, considering that “understanding is not concerned with grasping a fact but with apprehending a possibility of being” (ricoeur, kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 14 1998, p. 56). since we reside in both actuality and potential, we are always becoming. ricoeur and my self-understanding while i was narrated to believe that family is of the utmost importance, i had gradually distanced myself from my family for many years, that is, until my father became ill and i decided to return home. i had one opportunity to get to know him by means of having an adult relationship with him and i was willing to see where it would go, thereby being open to the possibilities. this prior distancing (distanciation) of myself from my family allowed me to face new experiences that were taken up (appropriated) into a newly developing identity. this process was not easy and it certainly was not fast, nor is it over. when i returned to victoria, i found a family that had remained closed, isolated, and stuck in the past (limited, misery). our relationships were frail for several years as we attempted to create new narrations out of our shared present. however, the narrations of the past continued to loom over us. eventually, as my father’s illness became more serious, he began to talk openly about his life. since i was the only family member willing to talk about death and dying, he shared many stories with me, many of which i was later honoured to share at his funeral. in particular, he told me that it was likely that i was not his child (existential event). while this fact had always been a rumour, it did not concern me so much in my past because in the past i had no real relationship with him (memesis1). then, suddenly, through our shared present, back in my family context as an adult (memesis2) i recognized him as a person, a father, who had not been there before. i knew then that i was going to miss him (mimesis3). this event helped me to reflect on the characteristics (ipse/idem) that i now possess, which are both inherited and mediated. when i consider the culturally and socially mediated values i possess, i know by letting go and rejecting some, while maintaining others, my narrated self has been moving forward through time and my identity has shifted. i continue to question what it means to have a biological lineage on this earth, that is, wondering if somehow it ties me to the human race in a certain way, or perhaps not knowing my biology creates more freedom and less othering (self and other than self). through a series of events, my relationship with my brother has become strained to the point in which we had not spoken for a long time. for certain, i have had no relationship to speak of with my oldest sister for many years. recently, i received a call that my brother had been diagnosed terminally ill. i needed to decide whether my ties to this family were strong enough to warrant a visit, particularly since i would likely encounter my older sister. i was called upon to muster up my human capacity to care (ethics and action). i went to victoria and visited my family. while visiting with my family, we had many conversations, some about death and dying, which brought us around to discussions about our parents. the dna test results were discussed and once again, particularly noting, that i was not biologically connected to my father, and that i was not greek (referent). while, in the past i had protested, i now knew (attestation/verification) that it was true that he was not my father; however, my protests continued, but changed, since, as my partner continues to remind me, “just because he was not your father, does not mean your father was not greek.” references andrew, j. d. (2000). tracing ricoeur. diatrics 30(2), 43-69. kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 15 gadamer, g. (2004). truth and method. (j. weinsheimer & d. marshall, trans). new york, ny: continuum. hall, d. (2007). paul ricoeur and the poetic imperative: the creative tension between love and justice. albany, ny: state university of new york press. kearney, r. (2002). on stories. new york, ny: routledge. kearney, r. (2004). on paul ricoeur: the owl of minerva. burlington, vt: ashgate. langdridge, d. (2004). the hermeneutic phenomenology of paul ricoeur. existential analysis 15(2), 243-255. martel, y. (1996). self. toronto, on, canada: random house. mccarthy, j. (2007). dennet and ricoeur on the narrative self. amherst, ny: prometheusbooks. muldoon, m. (2002). on ricoeur. belmont, ca: wadsworth. muldoon, m. (2006). tricks of time: bergson, merleau-ponty and ricoeur in search of time self and meaning. pittsburgh, pa: duquesne university press. pellauer, d. (2007). ricoeur: a guide for the perplexed. new york, ny: continuum. ricoeur, p. (1974). political and social essays. d. stewart & j. bien (eds). athens, oh: ohio university press. ricoeur, p. (1980). narrative time. critical inquiry, 7(1), 169-190. ricoeur, p. (1984). time and narrative (vol. 1). (k. mclaughlin & d. pellauer, trans). chicago, il: the university of chicago press. ricoeur, p. (1985). time and narrative (vol. 2). (k. mclaughlin & d. pellauer, trans). chicago, il: the university of chicago press. ricoeur, p. (1988). time and narrative (vol. 3). (k. mclaughlin & d. pellauer, trans). chicago, il: the university of chicago press. ricoeur, p. (1992). oneself as another. (k. blamey, trans). chicago, il; university of chicago press. ricoeur, p. (1998). paul ricoeur: hermeneutics and the human sciences. (j. thompson, trans). cambridge, uk: cambridge university press. ricoeur, p. (2004a). structure, word, event. (r. sweeney. trans). in d. ihde (ed.), the conflict of interpretations: essays in hermeneutics (pp.77-94). new york, ny: continuum. ricoeur (2004b). existence and hermeneutics. (k. mclaughlin, trans). in d. ihde (ed.), the conflict of interpretations: essays in hermeneutics (pp.3-24). new york, ny: continuum. ricoeur, p (2004c). memory, history, forgetting. (k. blamey & d. pellauer, trans,). chicago, il: university of chicago press. risser, j. (1986). hermeneutic experience and memory: rethinking knowledge as recollection. research in phenomenology, 16, 43-55. corresponding author: graham mccaffrey, rn phd email: gpmccaff@ ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics august 5, 2016 the author(s) 2016 compassion, necessity, and the pharmakon of the health humanities graham mccaffrey abstract health humanities is an emergent interdisciplinary field drawing on existing traditions of using resources from the arts and humanities in the education of health professionals. c ultivation of compassion is often cited, though not without some debate, as a fit goal for the health humanities. in this paper, i undertake a critical reappraisal of the presumed link between health humanities and compassion. firstly, i propose a model of the health humanities that takes up derrida’s figure of the pharmakon, as polyvalent medicine or poison (among other meanings). unlike derrida, however, i treat the pharmakon as a substance, even when referring to arts and humanities. i then offer examples of negative effects of the pharmakon that both attest to its potency and unsettle comfortable assumptions that it is necessarily benign. finally, i take up themes from simone weil’s reading of the iliad to propose that necessity may be a useful alternative, or addition, to the ways we think about the goals of the health humanities keywords health humanities, compassion, empathy mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 13 2 a drunkard i’ve never been an individual entity. sixty trillion cells! i’m a living collectivity. i’m staggering zigzag along, sixty trillion cells, all drunk! (from: what ? 108 zen poems by ko un, 2008, p. 39) health humanities is a recently marked out interdisciplinary field concerned with the use of resources from the arts and humanities in healthcare, and more broadly in relation to health. drawing on previous traditions of medical humanities, teaching practices in nursing and other disciplines, and arts based research, advocates for health humanities have staked out bold claims that the humanities can help to counter technical alienation in modern healthcare. there is a debated claim that health humanities help to foster empathy among students and practitioners in healthcare professions. in this paper, i add to the debate using the concept of the pharmakon to propose that if the humanities do indeed have effects, then these must be effects of substance, and effects that are potentially dangerous as well as beneficial. i give examples of the humanities being turned to sinister ends, yet not necessarily thereb y losing their link to empathy, and finally i propose that the goals of health humanities should include not only the stimulation of empathy or compassion, but also the recognition of necessity. health humanities note on empathy/compassion i consider empathy and compassion in the modern healthcare context to be functionally referring to the same phenomenon. in the disciplinary literatures, medicine has mostly latched on to empathy and nursing on to compassion, but they both seem to want them to mean a combination experience of emotional identification with another’s subjective situation and purposeful response to said situation. (compassion isolates suffering, but when empathy is talked about, there is an implicit assumption that anyone appealing to a health professional for help has some order of suffering, so even this apparent distinction is blurry). since it is actually so difficult to adequately capture in words the complex of emotions, thoughts, reasoning, bodily responses, decisions, and actions that comprise an event of empathy/compassion (and this only gets as far as the compassionate/empathetic actor, never mind what the intended recipient of the act perceives), it is worth bearing in mind that the taxonomic effort may itself be conditioned by the needs of medico-scientific rationalism. there is no consensus definition of empathy/compassion, and a whiff of moralizing essentialism in the literature (mccaffrey & mcconnell, 2015), not to mention at times more than a whiff of the quasi-religious (see for examples the grand transformative claims in armstrong, 2011 and krnzaic, 2015). empathy/compassion is not meaningless or irrelevant, but it is a phenomenon of human relating that is complex, culturally and politically inflected, contextual, dynamic and thus deeply interpretable. the strength and significance of the phenomenon are better sought in interpretive dialogue than in claims to final mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 13 3 definition. it is not a purpose of the present paper, then to decide between empathy and compassion, and throughout the body of the paper, i have mostly followed my disciplinary bias (as a nurse) by favouring the term compassion. amongst recent texts about the health humanities (and in one case, medical humanities), crawford, brown, baker, tischler, and abrams (2015) make the most unequivocal connection between humanities and empathy/compassion, describing reading as “a tool for broadening empathy” (p. 56) and more widely arguing that, “attention to literature and the arts can help to develop and nurture skills of observation, analysis, empathy and self-reflection” (p. 18). authors of a textbook of medical humanities make a very similar statement, with reflection repositioned as a means to cultivating empathy: “medical humanities attempts to cultivate certain key virtues in and values of medicine, such as altruism, empathy, compassion, as well as certain qualities of mind by means of various reflective, interpretive, and reflexive practices ” (cole, carlin, & carson, 2015, p. 10). jones, wear, and friedman (2014) take a more cautious attitude, questioning the easy chain of association that is set up in the literature from humanities, to humanism, to humane. however, while arguing against what they call “the instrumentalist justification” (p. 4) for the humanities, they replace it with “the intellectual practice of the humanities…which encourages fearless questioning…and refuses to accept the boundaries that science sets between biology and culture ” (p. 4). while it is worth questioning the word association trail from humanities to humane, in terms of instrumentality the authors only replace one functional purpose for the humanities in healthcare with a different one, and emphasize intellectuality to boot, which steers back towards the rationality of scientific medicine on its own terms. as an alternate strategy, in this paper i attempt to deconstruct the instrumentality of humanities in healthcare through an exploration of the pharmakon. pharmakon – definition and derrida pharmakon is a greek word with multiple meanings, including “drug” so it is the etymological root of the family of words to do with medications: pharmacology, pharmaceutical, pharmacist, and so on. meanings of pharmakon also include “poison, charm, spell” (barnhart, 2006, p. 785). derrida made much use of its polyvalent meanings in his essay plato’s pharmacy (1981), where he took up the use of the word in plato’s phaedrus in the context of socrates comparing a written text to a pharmakon. derrida’s essay is about the ambivalent and fissiparous effects of writing compared to speech and for him the potency of the word lies in “the regular, ordered polysemy that has, through skewing, indetermination, or overdetermination, but without mistranslation, permitted the rendering of the same word by ‘remedy,’ ‘recipe,’ ‘poison,’ ‘drug,’ ‘philter,’ etc” (p. 71). he acknowledged the more literal sense of pharmakon, but even then to establish it as an agent of double meanings and mixed effects: one must indeed be aware of the fact that plato is suspicious of the pharmakon in general, even in the case of drugs used exclusively for therapeutic ends, even when they are wielded with good intentions, and even when they are as such effective. there is no such thing as a harmless remedy. the pharmakon can never be simply beneficial. (p. 99) derrida, however, was much more interested in the linguistic play afforded by the use of the word in relation to language and emphasized its dynamic possibilities. “the pharmakon is the mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 13 4 movement, the locus, and the play: (the production of) difference. it is the differance of difference” (p. 127). he used two metaphors to underline the way in which pharmakon gets inside to have its effects, first as housebreaker: “apprehended as a blend and an impurity, the pharmakon also acts like an aggressor or a housebreaker, threatening some internal impurity and security” (p. 128), then as liquid: …the pharmakon always penetrates like a liquid; it is absorbed, drunk, introduced into the inside, which it first marks with the hardness of the type, soon to invade it and inundate it with its medicine, its brew, its drink, its potion, its poison. (p. 152) derrida was so taken up with the linguistic possibilities of pharmakon, however, that he insisted that it must be considered “a drug without substance ” (p. 142), “as antisubstance itself: that which resists any philosopheme, indefinitely exceeding its bounds as nonidentity, nonessence, nonsubstance” (p.70). for my purposes, i want to make use of the polysemic vitality of the pharmakon, while insisting on the pharmakon as substance. presented with a pharmakon, you have a choice whether or not to take it, but once taken it will change you, cell by cell. this is as true for compassion as it is for morphine, as true for reading a poem as it is for prozac. the neuroscientist antonio damasio (2012) has advanced a framework for understanding consciousness that posits an idea of human beings as physically interpretive organisms. human brains generate images in a constant stream that “are given saliency…according to their value for the individual” (p. 76). value is der ived “from the original set of dispositions that orients our life regulation, as well as from the valuations that all images we have gradually acquired in our experience have been accorded” (p. 76). another basic construct for damasio is that of map making, whereby images are arranged into varied and deeply complex patterns of meaning. in other words, while we have original dispositions rooted in the cellular makeup of human beings and genetics, our horizon of selfhood is constantly modified in exchange with social and cultural worlds, to which damasio, unlike other neuroscientists, accords great respect as the actual realm of human experience. curiously, he even slips into gadamerian sounding language, for example when he states, “our memories are prejudiced, in the full sense of the term, by our past history and beliefs” (p. 142) [italics in orginal]. the idea i am suggesting that we can think of the arts and humanities as mind-body altering substance is not all that surprising. we, as human beings, go to immense lengths to alter our consciousness as we find it. to alter consciousness is to alter the body and vice versa. there is the obvious category of mind/body altering substances, such as alcohol, tobacco, lsd, or heroin, but also foodstuffs (think of comfort food), then the activities we perform to feel good, running and exercise of all kinds (the so-called runner’s high), meditation, yoga, prayer, chanting, dressing up (or down), anything that causes sexual stimulation etc. if this seems to make humanities into more of a drug, then it also makes a drug into more of an idea; we already have a sense from the placebo effect that a drug’s efficacy can be an unstable compound of the drug and the idea of the drug. mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 13 5 humanities as pharmakon it is now possible to restate the arts-compassion link in another way: that the arts are another kind of mind/body-altering substance. putting it more concretely, to posit that reading a novel, for example, is good for nursing students, is to claim it has a distant effect: the student who reads a novel in my course today will be more likely to experience the neurobiological/subjective event of compassion when caring for a patient in six months time. george steiner, in a polemic partly directed at derrida, spelled o ut the physicality of art, in this case poetry, and its effects: as the act of the poet is met – and it is the full tenor and rites of this meeting which i would explore – as it enters the precincts, spatial and temporal, mental and physical, of our being, it brings with it a radical calling towards change. the waking, the enrichment, the complication, the darkening, the unsettling of sensibility and understanding which follow on our experience of art are incipient with action. (1989, p. 143) richard kearney, in his essay on diacritical hermeneutics, discussed what he called “carnal interpretation” (p. 8) whereby “every carnal act and organ inscribes its own imaginaire” and “sensation is expression and expression sensation. flesh is word and word flesh” (p. 8). or as w.h. auden put it more succinctly in his elegiac poem on the death of w.b. yeats: “the words of a dead man / are modified in the guts of the living” (auden, 1939/2016). one implication of taking the arts and humanitie s seriously as pharmakon is to see that, like pharmaceuticals, they may have beneficial effects, negative effects, or both, or none at all. a pharmakon is an interpretive substance since it alters perception, however subtly, and perception, or how a person sees the world, affects how she or he acts in the world. the arts and humanities would not matter, and there would be no reason to include them in curricula of health professions, unless they are a kind of pharmakon, an active substance. pharmaceuticals, as the most literal descendants of pharmakon, are set around with rituals of protection, authority, and propriety. health care professionals are habitually shocked by the laity’s disregard for correct ritual, which is called non-compliance. the reason for the ritual seriousness is obvious, that pharmaceuticals are known to have real effects on human beings, and their proper use is intended to maximize therapeutic effects and minimize harmful effects, through welltargeted delivery of specific agents at optimal doses: hence the “10 rights” of medication administration (vera, 2012). the meaning of the effects is, however, interpretable. modern society has highly sophisticated structures of meaning to endorse what is or is not a desirable effect. during the course of writing this paper, the tennis player maria sharapova gave a press conference at which she admitted to testing positive to a performance enhancing drug called meldonium (guardian, 2016). it is a drug manufactured in latvia for short-term treatment of ischemia by increasing blood flow. sharapova said she had been taking it for 10 years on the flimsy grounds that she has a family history of diabetes. what caught her out, however, was not that her pretext is medically mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 13 6 questionable, but that there was a change in ritual and she missed it. meldonium was added to the list of banned substances for tennis on january 1, 2016 (guardian, 2016). to what degree she believed her own dubious rationale is irrelevant, because the structure of meaning for her sport shifted and what had been a matter of indifference (in terms of legality) became redefined as one of culpable harm. the pharmakon of arts and humanities is likewise embedded in structures of meaning, and rituals of usage, because it too carries the potential for potent effects that may be judged desirable or harmful. to illustrate this point, i propose three strong counter examples to the uncomplicated assumption in the health humanities that exposure to works of creative imagination has positive effects. poetry written by jihadists, and by radovan karadzic, the bosnian serb leader during the civil war in the 1990s, are examples of art expressly in support of destructive ideologies. however, they are also examples of art that makes appeal to compassion. the third example, of the goethe oak, is a brutally ironic example of the possibility that the arts and humanities may have absolutely no effect on ethical behaviour. isis, war crime, goethe oak father, i have travelled a long time among deserts and cities. it has been a long journey, father, among valleys and mountains, so long that i have forgotten my tribe, my cousins, even humankind. these are lines from a poem by osama bin laden, (quoted in haykel & creswell, 2015, p. 6), in which he recounts his journeys from country to country through the persona of his young son, hamza, and then explains in his own voice the reasons for their travails. first of these is the need to respond to “a world where the suffering of innocents, particularly muslim innoce nts, is ignored and ‘children are slaughtered like cattle’” (haykel & creswell, 2015, pp. 6-7). he then goes on to blame the “zionists” (p. 7) for their attacks on muslims, and arab regimes for their failure to come to their defence. there is an unmistakable appeal to compassion in the poem, to recognize the sufferings of children, and then to take action to relieve their suffering. it is crucially, however, an absolutely selective compassion from which the invitation to care for the suffering of one category of people is accompanied by murderous rage towards other kinds of people. haykel and creswell (2015) put jihadist poetry into wider contexts of the popularity of poetry in parts of the arab world, and its place as part of jihadi culture. they argued that poetry has a function in establishing the self-proclaimed isis caliphate as “a fantasy world of fluctuating borders where anything can happen, including the recapture of past glories” (p. 9). while from the outside, it is easy to dismiss jihadi poetry as mere propaganda, it is more than that within the structures of meaning by which islamists seek to legitimize themselves, their values, and their actions. my second example of the potentially dangerous effects of a humanities pharmakon is the work of radovan karadzic, who was found guilty of genocide at the international court in the hague in march 2016 (international criminal tribunal for the former yugoslavia [icty], 2016). before the breakup of yugoslavia and the outbreak of war, karadzic was a psychiatrist and poet, mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 13 7 apparently at the confluence of healthcare and humanities. his poetry, however, was an outlet for his serb nationalist politics, which brought him to the leadership of the self-declared bosnian serb republic in 1992 and to a new career of ethnic cleansing of bosnian croats and muslims (bbc, 2014). surdukowski, a doctoral candidate in law, wrote a paper for a legal journal before the start of the war crimes trial in 2009, arguing that the prosecution could “use karadzic’s texts and affectations to warrior poetry in the pretrial brief and in admitted evidence” (surduko wski, 2005, p. 677). his article’s title memorably begins with the question, “is poetry a war crime?” (p. 673). if the examples cited in the article are anything to go by, karadzic’s poetry has little literary merit, but is intended to valorize a narrative of victimhood and heroic revenge: when the time comes for gun barrels to speak, for heroic days, valorous nights, when a foreign army floods your country, and wreaks havoc and causes damage in it, that condition must be righted: then you roam your homeland on foot, and your boots fight side by side with you. (cited in surdukowski, 2005, p. 685) here again, however, the poetry has a different sense within a structure of meaning where historical memory, identity, and narrative poetic tradition are connected to a living cultural context. i do not know whether karadzic’s poetry ever was admitted as evidence into his trial; probably there was no shortage of other kinds of evidence that made it superfluous. the question in surdukowski’s title is meant seriously, however, acknowledging the power of poetry as incitement to action via impassioned response. w.b. yeats interrogated himself on this same question when he asked rhetorically in his poem the man and the echo (1938/1982, p. 393): did that play of mine send out certain men the english shot? it is the real possibility of incitement to action that makes a pharmakon of the humanities, and the moral indeterminacy of the action as such that holds out potential of both benefit and harm. my third counter example of the link between humanities and empathy runs in a different direction. the goethe oak was an oak tree in central germany, where goethe reputedly wrote poetry while enamored of a local noblewoman. through its association with the great poet, it became a symbol of german humanism and civilization. in 1937, the nazis built the buchenwald concentration camp at the site, and they chose to build around the oak since to them it symbolized a link between german high culture and their own ideology. to inmates of the camp, however, it stood as a positive symbol of a german culture that preceded, and would survive the aberration of nazism (neumann, 2000, pp. 178-9). the nazis’ appropriation of the goethe oak had nothing to do with the content of his work, and was a grotesque reading of themselves as readers of goethe, whereby “civilization” is apportioned by race and language, and not by the quality of relationships within a whole society. the symbol of the goethe oak standing in buchenwald ruptures the assumption of a straightforward link between humanities and humanemccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 13 8 ness. the examples above point to the potency of arts and humanities as substance, and as reminder of the possible differential effects and uses of the pharmakon. compassion, contingency, and weil’s necessity “they talk about a life of brotherly love show me someone who knows how to live it.” (dylan, 1979) the argument so far does not disprove or discount a connection between the humanities and empathy or compassion, but it does complicate the connection and counters the tendency to assume it is automatic. i retain a conviction that the arts and humanities do have a place in nursing education and research, but that there is a space for re-examination of why that should be so. not only is the pharmakon of the humanities a substance of polyvalent goals and effects, but the target of compassion is itself inherently unstable. compassion is a fugitive experience, a human response that may or may not emerge in any given situation. a healthcare system, however, has to provide a threshold of consistent response, which has to include technical competency and ought also to include a flexible responsiveness to individualized needs, based on understanding of individual histories and experience. that, i believe, is both an ethical imperative and a practical one since we know by now that technical capability alone is not a ll there is to helping people improve or maintain health. objectifying people does not help. if the presence of compassion cannot be guaranteed, however, nor can it be dismissed. there are claims in the nursing literature on compassion that it is something more like a steady state virtue humming in the background (bradshaw, 2009; mccaffrey & mcconnell, 2015). that, however, is to stray from definitions of compassion that more or less agree it requires the particular stimulus of another’s suffering. a constant outpouring of compassion, presumably in response to a constant awareness of suffering, is a condition of saintliness which i will not say does not exist, but i suggest is sufficiently rare that we can discount it for the practical purposes of running a complex modern healthcare system. the variation that some people possess a disposition towards compassion, which will be triggered appropriately on each and every occasion it is called for, is somewhat more attainable but again, i would suggest, beyond the reach of most of us. if compassion is not reliable as a resource for healthcare providers, it does not therefore follow that it can be dispensed with altogether as one physician author (faust, 2009) suggested, in favour of observab le, external signs of k indness. if compassion cannot be summoned to order, by the same token, it cannot be refused when it does arise. if compassion is not a necessary condition of providing high quality healthcare at any given moment, nor does it make sense to deny that it may deeply enhance an interaction or that the ideal of compassion may furnish a sustaining sense of meaning for the practitioner. in practice, however, compassion is best considered as a contingent event and as such, contingency should be brought into the remit of arts and humanities. contingency, however, implies its opposite : necessity. compassion as a contingent event, and the arts and humanities as pharmakon, unstable but offering as at least one of its effects a route into imaginative understanding of, and feeling for the other, both require context for their mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 13 9 appearance in human life. simone weil’s reading of homer’s iliad offers one way into articulating the context, the background for the contingencies of compassion and artistic effect. she arrived at her conception of necessity in contrast to force. for her, the iliad demonstrated the fundamental significance of what she called force, which she saw as malign since it is always directed towards the objectification of human beings. she saw force as the e ncompassing theme of the iliad, appearing in almost every relationship and most vividly of course in warfare. thus she calls the iliad “the purest and loveliest of mirrors” (1940/2005, p. 183). she defined force as “that x that turns anybody who is subjected to it into a thing” (p. 183, italics in original). weil does not talk about empathy or compassion in her essay. she does not address whether or not we as readers should identify with characters in the iliad for better or worse, or whether we would be any better off for doing so. she does, however, claim to find elements of thought that have been lost to modern societies. o ne is that force invites retribution and that individuals can move precipitately and unpredictably from perpetrator to victim, and become objectified either way. instead of a recognition of the relationships between things, “conceptions of limit, measure, equilibrium, which ought to determine the conduct of life are, in the west, restricted to a servile function in the vocabulary of technics” (p. 195). in modern society (our modern society, not weil’s mid 20t h century modern society), measure does indeed have a servile function in that it is supposed only to be a data processing tool, and yet the vocabulary of technics is so dominant that we are often put in the position of servants to the servile. the francis report (2013) in the uk about the mid-staffs hospital, where flagrant neglect of patients ran rife, showed that staff were spellbound by outcome measures while literally failing to see the faces of suffering patients. weil remarks that “prestige, from which force derives at least three-quarters of its strength, rests principally upon that marvellous indifference that the strong feel toward the weak, an indifference so contagious that it infects the very people who are the objects of it” (p 199). it also says something about how healthcare interactions are influenced by the prestige of technical medicine itself carrying both professional and patient along in its powerful undertow. weil nonetheless finds a redemptive aspect in the iliad in rare “moments of grace” (p. 208) when homer describes tenderness between husbands and wives, parents and children, or even mutual respect on the battlefield. “it is in this that the iliad is absolutely unique, in this bitterness that proceeds from tenderness and that spreads over the whole human race, impartial as sunlight” (p. 208). the poem’s bitterness “is the only justifiable bitterness, for it springs from the subjection of the human spirit to force, that is, in the last analysis, to matter. this subjection is the common lot, although each spirit will bear it differently, in proportion to its own virtue” (p. 211). she elsewhere used the phrase “the hand of necessity” (p. 201) for this subjection to matter. in another of her works, weil wrote that, “the sun shines in the just and on the unjust…god makes himself necessity. there are two aspects of necessity: it is exercised, it is endured: the sun and the cross” (2002, p. 43). necessity is “the re lationship of things” (p. 48) and for her, “obedience is the only pure motive” but “obedience to necessity and not to force” (p. 49). here weil appears to be making a distinction between the necessity that is “the relationship of things” (p. 48) and force which the subjection to matter played out in human action. force admits of exceptions to itself when people are able to connect to the even more fundamental power of necessity, as gadamer wrote, “over and above our wanting and doing” (1960/2004, p. xxvi). the pharmakon of the arts and humanities as substance reminds us of the same necessity, the same mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 13 10 subjection to matter, even when we are most tempted to fly away with the language of the spirit. it can at its worst be used to incite resort to force, but it can otherwise bring us back to the necessity we all share, “the relationship of things” (weil, 2002, p. 48) in which we live and die. out of this necessity, at times, appears the contingent event of compassion. conclusion there is no final conclusion, if conclusion means a new definition of health humanities, a new curriculum, a new moral imperative towards making health professional more empathetic. if anything, i have tried to inject some irony into the health humanities, a sense of the tragic that the scientific wo rldview so conspicuously (and dangerously) lacks, because it enjoins us to wait for science to fix everything – including the problems science created – while life rushes onward regardless. if poetry can be likened to a drug, likewise a drug can be likened to poetry. both are “modified in the guts of the living” (auden, 2016). there remain vexed questions of how best to administer the pharmakon of the health humanities to students who have widely divergent degrees of receptivity or compliance. while a didac tic novel like still alice (genova, 2009) has obvious relevance to students learning about people with dementia, it is poor literature. nonetheless, it does have traces of weil’s necessity, the brute materiality of a decaying brain lived out in a character, albeit a two-dimensional one for much of the novel. empathy may result in action, in doing well by others (where for health professionals, “doing well” is a highly complex bundle of technical, emotional, cognitive, behavioural, and ethical activity), but what the humanities first teach is the fact of relationship, of contact with the raw shock of the other. references armstrong, k. (2011). twelve steps to a compassionate life. new york, ny: anchor. auden, w.h. (2016). in memory of w.b. yeats. retrieved from https://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/memory-w-b-yeats barnhart, r. (ed.). (2006). chambers dictionary of etymology. new york, ny: chambers. bbc. (2014). profile: radovan karadzic. retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/worldeurope-19960285 bradshaw, a. (2009). measuring nursing care and compassion: the mcdonaldised nurse? journal of medical ethics, 35, 465-468. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.028530 cole, t.r., carlin, n.s., & carson, r.a. (2015). medical humanities: an introduction. new york, ny: cambridge university press. crawford, p., brown, b., baker, c., tischler, v., & abrams, b. (2015). health humanities. basinstoke, uk: palgrave macmillan. damasio, a. (2012). self comes to mind: constructing the conscious brain. new york, ny: vintage. https://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/memory-w-b-yeats http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-19960285 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-19960285 mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 13 11 derrida, j. (1981). dissemination (trans. b. johnson). chicago, il: university of chicago press. dylan, b. (1979). slow train. bob dylan official website. retrieved from http://bobdylan.com/songs/slow-train/ faust, h.s. (2009). kindness, not compassion, in healthcare. cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 18(3), 287-299. doi: 10.1017/s0963180109090458 francis, r. (2013). report of the mid-staffordshire nhs foundation trust public inquiry. retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150407084003/http://www.midstaffspublicinquiry.c om/report gadamer, h.g. (1960/2004). truth and method. new york, ny: continuum. genova, l. (2009). still alice. new york, ny: gallery books. guardian. (2016). what is meldonium and why did maria sharapova take it? retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/mar/08/meldoniummaria-sharapovafailed-drugs-test haykel, b., & creswell, r. (2015). battle lines: want to understand the jihadis? read their poetry. the new yorker, june 8, 2015, retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/06/08/battlelines-jihad-creswell-and-haykel international criminal tribunal for the former yugoslavia [icty]. (2016). statement of the office of the prosecutor on the conviction of radovan karadžić. retrieved from http://www.icty.org/en/press/statement-of-the-office-of-the-prosecutor-on-the-conviction-ofradovan-karadzic jones, t., wear, d., & friedman, l.d. (2014). the why, the what, and the how of the medical/health humanities. in t. jones, d. wear, & l.d. friedman (eds.), health humanities reader (pp. 1-6). new brunswick, nj: rutgers university press. kearney, r. (2011). what is diacritical hermeneutics? journal of applied hermeneutics, article 1, 1-14. krznaric, r. (2015). empathy: why it matters, and how to get it. new york, ny: perigree. mccaffrey, g., & mcconnell, s. (2015). compassion: a critical review of peer-reviewed nursing literature. journal of clinical nursing, 24(19-20), 3006-3015. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12924 neumann, k. (2000). shifting memories: the nazi past in the new germany. ann arbor, mi: the university of michigan press. steiner, g. (1989). real presences. london, uk: faber. http://bobdylan.com/songs/slow-train/ http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/10.1017/s0963180109090458 http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150407084003/http:/www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/report http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150407084003/http:/www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/report http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/mar/08/meldonium-maria-sharapova-failed-drugs-test http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/06/08/battle-lines-jihad-creswell-and-haykel http://www.icty.org/en/press/statement-of-the-office-of-the-prosecutor-on-the-conviction-of-radovan-karadzic http://www.icty.org/en/press/statement-of-the-office-of-the-prosecutor-on-the-conviction-of-radovan-karadzic mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 13 12 surdukowski, j. (2005). is poetry a war crime? reckoning for radovan karadzic the poetwarrior. michigan journal of international law, 26, 673-699. un, k. (2008). what? 108 zen poems. berkeley, ca: parallax. vera, m. (2012). the 10 rights of drug administration. retrieved from http://nurseslabs.com/10rs-rights-of-drug-administration/ weil, s. (2002). gravity and grace. florence, ky : routledge. weil, s. (2005). simone weil: an anthology. (s. miles, ed.). london, uk: penguin. yeats, w.b. (1982). collected poems. london, uk: macmillan. http://nurseslabs.com/10-rs-rights-of-drug-administration/ http://nurseslabs.com/10-rs-rights-of-drug-administration/ corresponding author: nancy j moules email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 16, 2017 the author(s) 2017 is it really “yesterday’s war”? what gadamer has to say about what gets counted nancy j moules, lorraine venturato, catherine m laing, & james c field abstract in this paper, the authors address the perceived recent trend of funding and publishing bodies that seem to have taken a regard of qualitative research as a subordinate to, or even a subset of, quantitative research. in this reflection, they pull on insights that hans-georg gadamer offered around the history of the natural and human science bifurcation, ending with a plea that qualitative research needs to be received, appraised, judged, and promoted by different lenses and criteria of value. keywords qualitative research, hermeneutics, rigor, narratives, experience, funding of research, publishing qualitative findings in february 2016, an open letter was published in the bmj where 76 senior academics from 11 countries challenged the bmj to reconsider their practice of rejecting qualitative research as low priority, lacking practical value and interest to readers, and being unlikely to be cited (greenhalgh et al., 2016). the published letter makes a compelling argument for the need for complementary perspectives that are embraced by quantitative and qualitative research methods, citing and commending organizations that lay claim to the idea that “quantitative versus qualitative is yesterday’s war” (p. 4). we applaud this letter and its intent, but offer that, from our perspectives, this “war” seems to have returned and seems to be alive and well today, unfortunately. we can only speculate on what drives the majority of funding agencies to fund primarily, if not exclusively, quantitative moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 1 2 studies. at best, to be funded, a study must contain “mixed” or “multiple” methods, whereby the qualitative aspect is generally a watered-down version of what could stand as a sophisticated method in and of itself, cobbled onto a quantitative study. for example, to have a study that is purely hermeneutic in nature funded by a major granting agency is becoming increasing impossible, it seems. yet, hermeneutics as a research method is a rich, sophisticated, welldocumented approach to the human sciences that is grounded in a long tradition of philosophical thought dating back to the greeks, manifested in over three decades of research in the human sciences (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015). similarly, we run into the very problem that the authors (greenhalgh et al., 2016) identified with the bmj: getting published is becoming more difficult and, more often than not, the reviewers of submitted hermeneutic research manuscripts are guided by very different understandings, and regularly demonstrate an apparent misunderstanding of the purpose, substance, and contribution to the understanding that hermeneutics can make. in this paper, we take the stance that qualitative research addresses and answers different questions than quantitative research and it needs to be seen differently, and more importantly, evaluated differently. we draw on hermeneutic philosophy to offer some of the distinctions that hermeneutic research, as one example of qualitative work, can bring to knowledge. “what is established by statistics seems to be a language of facts, but which questions these facts answer and which facts would begin to speak if other questions are asked are hermeneutical questions” (gadamer, 2007, p. 84). gadamer reminds us that facts are important but also that there are different kinds of facts and different meanings of facts. the development of the natural sciences as a rigorous method comes with a history that has bequeathed to us a seemingly impenetrable order that is imposed in research. what imposed itself in the seventeenth century was a new concept of science. founded upon experimentation and mathematics, it was a new attitude focused on quantification that, in constant progress and lasting self-improvement, eventually transformed science into research. (gadamer, 1988/2016, p. 35) this new concept of science created a bifurcation whereby the human sciences became the country cousin to the natural sciences, at best being regarded as an inexact science and, at worst, as nothing of value beyond self-indulgent subjectivity. thus, “being subjective” (as opposed to being “objective”) was leveled as a criticism at qualitative research and any claims to truth were dismissed as soft, rigor was questioned, and the un-testability of the results posited as a serious limitation. moules was recently asked by a colleague, how she could prove that her interpretations in her research were true and, if she could not prove they were, was the research method more like religion than it was like research? forgotten in this question is what truth means and gadamer’s distinction between certainty and truth is useful here. what motivates the priority of self-consciousness over against the consciousness of things in modern thinking is the primacy of certainty over truth, which was founded on the idea of method in modern science…method has been understood as a path towards reaching certainty. (gadamer, 1975/2016, p. 128) moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 1 3 we think, in this instance, the challenge was based on the assumption that, in a religious sense, truth is aligned with faith, and faith is often critiqued as being blind. however, there are certain overlaps between faith in religion and openness in hermeneutics. both rely on an absence of certainty, an absence of proof, and on the possibility that what you find might be wrong. indeed, faith can only exist where there is uncertainty, and you cannot have faith without uncertainty. fanaticism, then the defining quality being extreme, uncritical, single-minded zeal (merriamwebster, n.d.) is the opposite of faith because of the degree of certainty required. you do not need faith if you are a fanatic because you “know” it to be true. a fanatic, as winston churchill said, “is someone who can’t change his mind and won't change the subject.” thus, certainty and proof are an anathema in both religion and hermeneutics and yet there is also truth in both. truth in qualitative work is often erroneously thought of as subjective correspondence between thought and world. hermeneutic truth is plural, not singular, in this way: there is not one right way to help all patients recover from cancer, for example, or a single method for helping every child learn to read. at the same time, not every way is right. we can get it wrong; we can make people sicker in trying to help them heal. we can make learning to read impossible; while trying to teach, we can deceive ourselves thoroughly and fall into untruth (wrathall, 2013) in the very pursuit of truth…. truth is tricky in hermeneutic work because it disappears as it appears. we never get “the whole truth and nothing but the truth,” because truth is both revealed to us and concealed from us at once. (moules et al., 2015, p. 76) when method leads us to certainty rather than truth, as in the way that interpretations that hold up are “true” of something that brings us closer to understanding the topic, then certainty closes off any further understanding. certainty is in alliance and partnership with agreement, and gadamer reminds us that mutual understanding does not imply agreement; in fact, if agreement exists, then there is no need to seek understanding as it has already been relegated to certainty (vandevelde & iyer, 2016). the provocative question asked by the colleague encapsulates the very critique that is often leveled at qualitative research and that ends up in a diminishment or dismissal of what it has to offer. sometimes, and more frequently it seems, it results in such studies not being evaluated as worthy of funding. an example we offer is a study that moules and colleagues have been trying to have funded for many years involving an examination of parents’ experiences of anticipatory grief of knowing their child is dying, in relationship to their experiences of post death grief. the reviews received on grant applications consistently suggest that, since the study was not going to involve any measurement of these experiences, the value of the study was questionable. there is much debate in the fields of thanatology, grief, and bereavement of whether or not measuring grief is possible but even with those who believe it is and that such a tool is valuable, there is consensus that the experience of grief is complex, immeasurable, deeply individual and experiential far beyond what any tool might discern. there are aspects of grief that can never be measured or, in some ways, ever articulated (moules, 2010). grief is a profound experience of suffering that invariably escapes our capacity to quantify. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 1 4 it is indeed true that experience and the natural sciences founded upon experience carry with them the following assumption about being of nature: that which is without foundation, the accidental, the miraculous has no place in it…it can be said, though, that experience teaches us precisely that unpredictable arbitrariness of human beings constantly intervenes in the course of nature. (gadamer, 1964/2016, p. 3) human experience, upon which qualitative research is based, is complex and often cannot be explained, and gadamer suggested that “the complex does not have the character of a connection between cause and effect in the way it underlies our knowledge and calculation of the course of nature” (p. 4). he challenged the fundamental assumption of science in being able to determine precisely both the cause and effect, claiming that the opposite is often true when it comes to experience: sometimes “small causes have huge consequences” (p. 4). for a full century, we have attempted to delineate the human sciences by contrasting them with the natural sciences, to the extent that the human sciences have been measured by the scientific character proper to the kind of sciences they are…now present-day researcher opine that both groups of sciences might eventually merge together again, but not because the so-called human science would in the meantime have become more exact but because the natural sciences themselves would have transformed. (gadamer, 1988/2016, p. 25) the demand for verification, correctness, and provability underlies the exactness of the natural sciences, and we concede that some things need to be exact and verified, but we offer that few things can be, and some need not be. gadamer harkens us back to the idea of myths. myths do not demand verification and they are not provable. “‘myth’ indeed means nothing other than narrative, but it is a narrative that authenticates itself, that is to say: a narrative that one does not attempt to authenticate and confirm” (p. 31), reminding us that aristotle claimed that it is “mark of the educated person to know of what to demand proofs and of what not to demand them” (p. 31). we do not need to demand proof of the suffering of parents who have lost a child to cancer (moules, estefan, mccaffrey, tapp, & strother, 2016a, 2016b, 2016c); we do not need to demand proof that children’s cancer camps make a difference in the lives of families experiencing cancer (laing & moules, 2015). we do not need to verify that relationships matter in teaching, or that children ought to be treated with respect, or that what they have to say about what they know is important, or that teachers need to listen carefully to those they teach. what we do need to do is to ask of these experiences, to probe them for what is meaningful, to make sense of what our patients or students live through, that is, we have to understand them so that we can help them heal and learn. in doing so, we have to better understand ourselves in relation to our patients or students and understanding, in relation to others, is not something that needs to be verified in a scientific sense. rather, understanding is about discovering the rich contours of the lives we inquire into, and what matters or does not matter, that is, what helps. when we examine our own understanding and praxis in the face of the suffering we encounter, and when we respond appropriately to the miracles and the mysteries that arise suddenly in the middle of our inquiries, hermeneutic inquiry can reveal things science cannot. these are narratives that authenticate themselves in relationships that teach or heal. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 1 5 we can formulate this concern about philosophy with the following question: can philosophy in the age of modern science be understood as something more than an 'ancilla scientiarum, the handmaiden of the sciences...called to service with the ceremonious name of "theory of knowledge"'? gadamer's answer to the question is an emphatic 'yes' because scientific knowledge can tell us nothing about human praxis at the individual and social level. (vandevelde & iyer, 2016, p. xxviii) when he [gadamer] speaks about how the human sciences cannot aspire to the same level of scientificity and objectivity of knowledge as the natural sciences, he is making a plea for the contemporary relevance of praxis against the exclusive power of epistemē and for the role of practical philosophy as it is embodied in the human sciences. this is how gadamer may concede the truth of the mocking remark made by the vienna circle about the human sciences being at most ten percent science when it comes to their scientificity. but he emphasizes that it is the other ninety percent that is the most crucial from the standpoint of human existence as it concerns shared living and solidarity. (vandevelde & iyer, 2016, p. xxix) returning to the question of faith, truth, and religion, it is possible that one can become a fanatical hermeneut, falling prey to the lure of certainty. let us be clear: we are not arguing here that qualitative research is better than quantitative. we are arguing that it is different and that it reveals equally important insights into practice, that is, it needs to be valued equally. it also needs to have its own rigor. moules et al. (2015) addressed the issue of rigor and validation in hermeneutic work in particular, suggesting that the rigor that is sought in interpretive research does not conform to that of being strict, inflexible, exact, precise, accurate, and rigid. it does, however, meet another definition of rigor which is the “quality of being careful” (p. 171). qualitative research must treat its topics care-fully (with care and fully), seeing validity that is located in being strong, powerful, robust, healthy, and telling (moules et al., 2015, p. 172). it should yield insight into the human condition. it should help us decide how we might live well with others, how we might, given their lives, help them heal or learn. the difficulty lies, however, in how to convince those we rely on for funding or dissemination that our work is underpinned by these traits and, more importantly, that these traits matter as much as measures of exactness, causality, prediction, and repeatability. twenty years ago, qualitative work was recognized as legitimate; the accessibility of federal funding was evidence of this. guidelines for tri-council funding in canada even added a chapter on evaluating qualitative work differently with different standards. publication in reputable journals did not require a desperate back-and-forth battle with uniformed reviewers. qualitative journals sprang up; qualitative research institutes blossomed, and it no longer felt as though we were in competition with our big city cousin. we can only speculate on what has made the pendulum swing again. in current times, it might be economically driven – hermeneutics does not produce jobs, new technologies, or cures. the increased emphasis on evidence-based practice may be a factor. this, however, begs the question: what counts as evidence? how is it that we have shifted from the original tenets of evidence-based practice as a trinity of research evidence health professional experience and judgment, and patient preferences to one that prioritizes only quantitative research? if evidence only lies in numbers, mathematics, statistics, and calculability, then it makes sense that the kinds of results that arise moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 1 6 from qualitative research hold little utility from this perspective. those results do not address causality or predictability; they do not speak to health economics or produce new drugs. rather, they help us understand what it means to be human and to live together well. is this enough? given that the state of the world does not seem to be a “scientific problem,” we think so. “to understand the other is truly a difficult art, but also a human task” (gadamer, 1988/2016, p. 39). gadamer (1988/2016) invoked as well the influence of modern technology as having played a factor in the objectification of the human sciences. “increasingly, even the sciences we call human sciences, share in the progress of this technological development of the means of knowledge and information” (p. 38). how much more complete is a computer generated index of today…but is it really only a progress…although all the information we need is available immediately, i wonder whether it is not better that, when having forgotten something, i have to look for it again and, perhaps, in the process find something other than what i was looking for. this is what we truly call doing research: to ask questions that always lead to further question, which we did not anticipate. we are now facing totally new possibilities for alleviating the burden on our memory. this entails that we no longer need our own mental power in order to reawaken what we have forgotten and we no longer nurture recollection…this situation cannot be totally different in the natural sciences…we have come so far with these new advances that research, which previously required twenty years, can now produce results with a computer in a matter of minutes. this has undoubtedly resulted in gains, but also in tasks that turn out to be evermore difficult when it comes to the rational application of our know-how. we only have to think of the beneficial wonder of forgetting and the transfigurative magical power of remembering. the retrieval of data from databases will not give us anything so felicitous. (gadamer, 1988/2016, pp. 38-39) in conclusion, qualitative research is not a “soft,” or “dumbed down” version of quantitative research. it is a different kind of research aimed, not simply at knowing, but more fully at living an ethical life as practitioners, something that cannot be achieved solely through science. if it is research aimed at helping us live well “with and for others in just institutions,” as ricoeur (1992, p. 352) suggested, then it cannot be submitted to an explanatory science that only accounts for causality and order. human sciences rather belong to orders that constantly configure and reconfigure themselves through our own concrete participation in them and thereby contribute to our knowledge about the human possibilities and normative commonalities that affect us. thus, the human sciences bring us before ourselves…of all the sciences, it is especially the so-called human sciences that contribute the most to the nurturing of these capacities. they force us to confront constantly in all its richness the entire scale of what is human and all too human. (gadamer, 1988/2016, p. 41) what it means to be human and “all too human” is what tethers qualitative research to the real world. qualitative research articulates human experience; it brings language to experience and then complements this articulation with a depth that helps us understand it. understanding what moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 1 7 it means to be human, and how we can help others flourish, is not a trite matter but, rather, a difficult, on-going human task, and no computer can relieve us from its burden. references fanaticism. (n.d.). in merriam-webster online dictionary. retrieved from https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/fanaticism gadamer, h-g. (2007). the gadamer reader: a bouquet of later writings (r.e. palmer, ed. & trans.). evanston, il: northwestern university press. gadamer, h-g. (1964/2016). is there a causality in history? in hermeneutics between history and philosophy: the selected writings of hans-georg gadamer, vol. 1 (pp. 3-12) (p. vandevelde & a. iyer, trans.). london, uk: bloomsbury. gadamer, h-g. (1975/2016). subjectivity and intersubjectivity, subject and person. in hermeneutics between history and philosophy: the selected writings of hans-georg gadamer, vol. 1 (pp. 125-137) (p. vandevelde & a. iyer, trans.). london, uk: bloomsbury. gadamer, h-g. (1988/2016). the history of the universe and the historicity of human beings. in hermeneutics between history and philosophy: the selected writings of hans-georg gadamer, vol. 1 (pp. 25-41) (p. vandevelde & a. iyer, trans.). london, uk: bloomsbury. greenhalgh, t., annandale, e., ashcroft, r., barlow, j., black, n., bleakley, a.,…ziebland, s. (2016). an open letter to the bmj editors on qualitative research. the bmj, 352, 1-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i563 laing, c.m., & moules, n.j. (2015). “it’s not just camp!” understanding the meaning of children’s cancer camps for children and families. journal of pediatric oncology nursing, 33, 33-44. doi: 10.1177/1043454214563934 moules, n.j. (2010). invited editorial. how do you feel something when there is no word for it? reflections on grief in brazil teaching, nursing, and research. revista da escola de enfermagem da usp (journal of school of nursing university of sao paulo), 44(2), 243-249. issn: 00806234 moules, n.j., estefan, a., mccaffrey, g., tapp, d.m., & strother, d. (2016a). differences and trading: examining the effects of childhood cancer on the parental subsystem. part one. journal of family nursing, 22(4), 515-539. doi: 10.1177/1074840716668102 moules, n.j., estefan, a., mccaffrey, g., tapp, d.tm, & strother, d. (2016b). taking one for the team: examining the effects of childhood cancer on the parental subsystem. part two. journal of family nursing, 22(4), 540-558. doi: 10.117/1074840716675985 moules, n.j., estefan, a., mccaffrey, g., tapp, d.m, & strother, d. (2016c). examining the effects of childhood cancer on the parental subsystem: implications for parents and healthcare moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 1 8 professionals. part three. journal of family nursing, 22(4), 559-578. doi: 10.1177/1074840716675986 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. ricoeur, p. (1992). oneself as another. chicago, il: the university of chicago press. vandevelde, p., & iyer, a. (2016). translators' introduction: hermeneutics at the crossroads between history and philosophy. in h-g. gadamer, hermeneutics between history and philosophy: the selected writings of hans-georg gadamer, vol. 1 (p. vandevelde & a. iyer, trans., pp. xvi-xxxv). new york, ny & london, uk: bloomsbury. corresponding author: william konchak university of iceland email: wik2@hi.is journal of applied hermeneutics october 19, 2017 the author(s) 2017 self-transformation: body, mind, and spirit william konchak abstract in this paper, i explore a conception of self-transformation that attempts to provide a holistic account covering a range of body, mind, and spirit. i draw upon kym maclaren’s exploration of the role of the body inspired by the work of maurice merleau-ponty (body); the hermeneutics of hans-georg gadamer (mind [language]); and ralph waldo emerson’s transcendentalism (spirit). i present the case that each of these approaches develops important aspects of self-transformation and can be seen as complementary. i explore this in relation to philosophy as a practical activity, drawing upon pierre hadot’s perspective of philosophy as a way of life. keywords hermeneutics, philosophy, philosophy as a way of life, phenomenology, transcendentalism pierre hadot’s conception of philosophy as a way of life is a vision of philosophy as a lived practice that transforms the philosopher, a perspective that he developed through his explorations of ancient philosophy (see hadot 1995, 1995/2004). in hadot’s view, this practical emphasis, although never completely lost in modern and contemporary philosophy, is something that should be rekindled. for hadot, theoretical discourse in ancient philosophy was not in the abstract but was used to support practical practices and self-transformation, and he writes “theory is never considered an end in itself; it is clearly and decidedly put in the service of practice” (1995, p. 60). within this conception of philosophy, both theory and practice have a place, but theory is to be used to support the practice of self-transformation. it is suggested that the thought of kym maclaren, hans-georg gadamer, and ralph waldo emerson all have affinities with this conception of philosophy in that the point of their perspectives are not to just espouse a konchak journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 9 2 theoretical philosophy, but rather that it is intended to help promote change and selftransformation. thus, whether we are considering maclaren’s existential and bodily-based account (body, inspired by maurice merleau-ponty), gadamer’s self-understanding (mind [language]), or emersonian transcendentalism (spirit), it is suggested that each thinker provides an important theoretical orientation that may help to encourage self-transformation and, together, may contribute towards a holistic conception of self-transformation that covers body, mind, and spirit. maclaren kym maclaren, in her article “emotional clichés and authentic passions: a phenomenological revision of a cognitive theory of emotion,” articulates a bodily based conception of emotion, one that moves beyond “emotional clichés” towards what she calls “authentic existential passions.” her argument revolves around drawing upon a bodily based account of participatory experience, which questions and surpasses traditional dualistic mind and subjective based accounts of experience, pointing towards a bodily intelligence which emphasizes the interaction and co-evolution of meaning with the lived bodily experience of engaging with the world. although this account is nuanced, an important point she derives from this is that we do not consciously form all of our meanings; rather, many are passively received or co-evolved in relation to those around us and our bodily experience of interacting with the world and become habitual patterns. she relates this conception to emotions, which, in her view, are not sufficiently explained by cognitive accounts that focus on choice and conscious judgments, but rather, are more passively received in many situations from our previous patterns of engagement, and she writes “intelligent bodily responses to the environment are neither explicitly willed, nor the caused effect of unconscious thought processes; rather the sensed world, itself, motivates movement” (maclaren, 2011, p, 51, emphasis in original). in her account, in many situations we do not have an active choice, or to make such a choice may be very challenging because of our attachment to habitual patterns and how they may be held in place by the world around us and incline us in certain directions. an important concept she formulates is authentic existential passions, which she proposes is “a more radical conception of passivity and its role in subjectivity” (maclaren, 2011, p. 59). she relates this to genuine questions, which break apart habitual meanings and conceptions of self and how we live, and these are emotions that overtake us and are different from emotional clichés. emotions from authentic passions are like first order speech and she relates them to conceptions of primary and poetic language, creative meaning and authenticity, in contrast to second order emotional clichés that reinforce habitual patterns and talk. in respect to authentic existential passions, she gives the example of the death of a close loved one who was the center of one’s world, and the challenges of this, where one’s life and everyday routine was intertwined with another. in this situation, a person is faced with a crumbling world, but must carry on. the center of their life is gone which prompts not an isolated questioning, but a questioning of their life, which, for maclaren, calls for creative transformation, and to this end draws upon r.g. collingwood to suggest artistic expression as one means to accomplish this. it is through the expression itself that we may gain some distance from the experience and creatively transform our lives. maclaren describes an authentic passion: konchak journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 9 3 this is what it means, i propose, to be put fundamentally into question, to live as a question, and thus to experience an existential passion. it is to be a subjectivity or an experiencing in which subject and object are not yet fully realized, in which how things mean and who one is are still in flux; it is to be an experiencing which calls not for a mere endorsement of familiar meanings, but for self-overcoming, for some creative form of expression in which a new grasp on the world is realized—however provisionally— and one newly “becomes oneself” (at least until the next breakdown of meaning). (p. 62) maclaren’s account of the transformative potential of authentic passions finds resonance with emerson’s perspectives. for example, he writes: the death of a dear friend, wife, brother, lover, which seemed nothing but privation, somewhat later assumes the aspect of a guide or genius; for it commonly operates revolutions in our way of life, terminates an epoch of infancy or of youth which was waiting to be closed, breaks up a wonted occupation, or a household, or style of living, and allows the formation of new ones more friendly to the growth of character. (1983, p. 302) these challenging experiences can spur us towards growth and transformation and are not just something that is just intellectually engaged with, but are events that as we experience them have the potential to profoundly change us. in truth and method, gadamer also speaks of the importance of experiences of suffering and how we may not be spared the experience of having our anticipations frustrated, which may encourage an openness to new experience and a realization of our human finitude. gadamer discusses the experience of limitation more generally rather than more devastating experiences maclaren and emerson are thinking of, and he remarks that “every experience worthy of the name thwarts an expectation,” (1960/1989, p. 356) and later notes “the experienced man knows that all foresight is limited and all plans uncertain. in him is realized the truth value of experience” (p. 357). for gadamer, these smaller upheavals may encourage revising our prejudices towards broader and more fluid perspectives, a process of self-transformation. this process arguably has an affinity with philosophy as a way of life and is a life practice: insight is more than the knowledge of this or that situation. it always involves an escape from something that had deceived us and held us captive. thus insight always involves an element of self-knowledge and constitutes a necessary side of what we called experience in the proper sense. insight is something we come to. it too is ultimately part of the vocation of man—i.e., to be discerning and insightful. (p. 356) for gadamer, the approaches of cultivating openness and flexibility, which emphasizes openness and recognition of our human finitude, is a process that may lead to self-transformation and is an ongoing task that is never completed, a “vocation of man,” or, said another way, a “way of life.” thus, all three thinkers hold conceptions of the importance of openness towards new possibilities that can encourage self-transformation and have affinities with the approach of philosophy as a konchak journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 9 4 way of life. i now turn to exploring further aspects of gadamer and emerson’s thought and considering how their perspectives may both differ from and complement maclaren’s. gadamer gadamer has concerns about excessive purposefulness and mastery, in respect to method and perspectives of scientism more generally. his hermeneutics provides an account of understanding that is self-understanding, meaning that we change in the process of interpretation. this is not something that can be willfully controlled, but has the character of an event, and is something that we participate in. for gadamer, at the heart of his approach is a sense of dialogue and openness to the other through conversation. an important part of this is learning to take the risk of being open and to embrace change and growth, and working towards this openness is fundamental to gadamer’s thought and can be seen as an important hermeneutic practice. for gadamer, humans are finite beings embedded within their language and tradition, which are flexible and dynamic and prejudices are positive in that that they are our entry points into understanding and they can evolve. although it is not possible to get beyond all prejudices, they can be brought into play to change one’s self-understanding, and through, for example, the transformative effects of openness to the other and by following the subject matter in conversation and interpretation, there can be a movement towards broader and more flexible perspectives. i will now turn to briefly to explore gadamer’s conception of the “i and thou” relation, which gadamer explores in relation to tradition, textual interpretation and people (see gadamer, 1960/1989), although the focus here will be verbal conversation. gadamer explains how there are three ways of approaching a thou, with the idea that one may learn to respect the other in openness rather than turning a relation towards one’s own ends. the first way is a type of predictive approach where one understands a person similarly to any other object, and seeks to predict behavior, and he remarks that “from the moral point of view this orientation toward the thou is purely self-regarding and contradicts the moral definition of man” (p. 358). if this approach is taken, there cannot be a true dialogue or openness to the other, as one is caught up in interpreting the other in terms of one’s own preconceptions and self-serving goals. gadamer points to a second way of relating “the thou is experienced and understood in that the thou is acknowledged as a person, but despite this acknowledgment the understanding of the thou is still a form of self-relatedness” (p. 359). although this is a more adequate way of relating to a thou than the first approach, it still has shortcomings. he gives an example of charity or welfare work, and contends that from this point of view there is a claim to know the thou better than they know themselves and that this is not a true listening because there is a claim to know the other in advance. this is obviously a more subtle failure. gadamer discusses a third way: in human relations the important thing is, as we have seen, to experience the thou truly as a thou—i.e., not to overlook his claim but to let him really say something to us. here is where openness belongs. but ultimately this openness does not exist only for the person who speaks; rather, anyone who listens is fundamentally open. without such openness to one another there is no genuine human bond. (p. 361) konchak journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 9 5 openness involves being able to acknowledge one’s finitude and to recognize how one may be governed by prejudices. this involves a willingness to bring one’s prejudices into play by being open to the other and by following the subject matter, which may lead towards new perspectives. gadamer notes that this is not slavish obedience, but rather, “openness to the other, then, involves recognizing that i myself must accept some things that are against me, even though no one else forces me to do so” (p. 361). this approach of moving towards more open perspectives in relation to a thou could be seen as a type of practice that may encourage self-transformation. maclaren (2011) presents examples of how people are creating problematic situations based on their habitual responses, and also points to how potentially there could be far better interpersonal interactions. on her account, these routine responses are less a matter of choice or conscious awareness and more a way of following habitual patterns, where emotional clichés may be used by people in relationships to create and perpetuate unproductive relations that serve to keep them from deeper questioning. gadamer’s perspectives may help lead from habitual egotistic and limiting patterns towards more authentic and respectful dialogue. for gadamer, it is important to be open to learning and be willing to risk one’s preconceptions, to be open enough to know that one does not know and to be willing to ask questions, and the point in dialogue is not to win the argument but to engage in questions and answers, where the conversation partners need to be with one another and both directed by the subject matter. for gadamer, it is important to learn to listen to the weight of the argument, not try to argue the other person down, and there is an art of good questioning. the aim is for both speakers to come to agreement over the subject matter (keeping in mind that there will always be some differences), where they may move beyond previous points of view, a fusion of horizons. understanding of the subject matter takes the form of language and “is the coming-into-language of the thing itself” (1960/1989, p. 378). gadamer writes “every conversation presupposes a common language, or better, creates a common language,” (p. 378) which is worked out in conversation. this has implications for selfunderstanding and self-transformation, as “to reach an understanding in a dialogue is not merely a matter of putting oneself forward and successfully asserting one’s own point of view, but being transformed into a communion in which we do not remain what we were” (p. 379). this points to the opportunity and risk, as we do not know beforehand which beliefs will be changed, where we can be surprised and “pulled up short” and our provisional meanings are re-defined, with the opportunity for expansion and enriched self-understanding. maclaren points to the role of others in expanding our perspectives and transformation, although her emphasis is primarily through “the ways that they themselves live toward us and our shared world, through their bodily intentionalities” (2009, p. 41). in this respect, it is suggested that gadamer’s perspectives provides a linguistically based account that compliments maclaren’s bodily based perspectives. now, maclaren’s account of the role of others is nuanced and she points to the potential limitations of our interactions as well: other people play an essential role in producing such a constrained situation—and thus they play a role in the production of compulsions and regressions—for they resist attempts at configuring the situation, and therefore rule out certain potential resources as not viable. but at the same time, others can lend us new existential resources for making sense of our situation. (p. 42) konchak journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 9 6 thus, the other can either facilitate or constrain one’s freedom, and no doubt this is true whether we consider our community as linguistically, bodily based, or both. this is an important point, and what is one to do if the environment is not very supportive? for example, thoreau’s famous words “the mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation” (1854/2004, p. 117) may point towards both individual choices and collective structures that may not support human flourishing in its fullest sense. emerson emerson’s transcendentalism gives a strong reminder of our own inner resources and why there is a need to listen within. with his conception of self-reliance, there is a strong rallying cry towards individual integrity, creation, and freedom and to move away from limiting habits and patterns. as maclaren (2011) points out, people are often caught within their habits, which may be reinforced and co-created by others. a strong emphasis in emerson’s thought is to work against this tendency. against following societal norms, he writes, “society everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood of every one of its members” (emerson, 1983, p. 261); against our own habitual patterns asks, “why drag about this corpse of your memory, lest you contradict somewhat you have stated in this or that public place?” and later notes “a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds” (p. 265); and against following what others may impose on us, he remarks that “nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind” (p. 261). he also recognizes that we may pay a price for following ourselves, as “for nonconformity the world whips you with its displeasure. and therefore a man must know how to estimate a sour face” (p. 264). for emerson, humankind suffers from a general state of conformism and adults have largely lost touch with themselves. given this, we must rally ourselves from this false dependency and learn to cultivate the inner fortitude to listen to and follow oneself. in this process, we must learn to trust our own intuition to a greater extent and rely on rational perspectives and argument less. although friendship and learning from others were important for emerson, his conception of self-reliance provides important resources to encourage the individual impetus towards self-transformation, and he notes that “nothing can bring you peace but yourself. nothing can bring you peace but the triumph of principles” (p. 282). emerson is not pointing towards withdrawing from the world, but a way of being in the world that is true to oneself; for example, he writes “it is easy in the world to live after the world’s opinion; it is easy in solitude to live after our own; but the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude” (p. 263). now, although it is important for emerson to cultivate integrity whatever the external circumstances, there is also a strong emphasis in his thought towards manifesting ideals in reality, and in his later thought he was increasingly concerned about social causes, such as his support of the anti-slavery movement. for emerson, humans are connected to nature and it is helpful to go outwards toward nature, as it helps profoundly reconnect with oneself. for example, emerson writes “the ancient precept, ‘know thyself,’ and the modern precept, ‘study nature,’ become at last one maxim” (p. 56). he notes that “in the woods, is perpetual youth. within these plantations of god, a decorum and sanctity reign, a perennial festival is dressed, and the guest sees not how he should tire of them in a thousand years. in the woods, we return to reason and faith” (p. 10). for emerson, by poetically and profoundly encountering nature, one can be brought back to oneself. for example, he writes “the waving of the boughs in the storm, is new to me and old. it takes me by surprise, konchak journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 9 7 and yet is not unknown. its effect is like that of a higher thought or a better emotion coming over me, when i deemed i was thinking justly or doing right” (p. 11). conceptions of overcoming fear and being courageous are also important for emerson, as is a sense of cheerfulness and optimism. for emerson, the deeper one moves within, there is a connection to a public and collective power which we each can draw upon and each of us have an individual connection to this inner light, and there is compatibility between one’s own individuality and the divine, and one is being self-reliant by one’s deep connection and spiritual receptivity. although emerson is encouraging the receptivity to genius, this is what everyone has but few use, so there is a democratic emphasis in that this is possible for everybody to do, and if everyone or at least a critical mass did, society would be reformed. emerson (1983) writes: the things which are dear to men at this hour are so on account of the ideas which have emerged on their mental horizon, and which cause the present order of things as a tree bears its apples. a new degree of culture would instantly revolutionize the entire system of human pursuits. (pp. 407-408) for all of emerson’s idealism, he was also aware of the challenges to achieve and incorporate these insights. he notes “our faith comes in moments; our vice is habitual. yet there is a depth in those brief moments which constrains us to ascribe more reality to them than to all other experiences” (p. 385). emerson is a thinker of sudden epiphanies that may be integrated into oneself and one may grow from, but he is also well aware of the propensity to backslide. for example, he writes “well, in the space of an hour, probably, i was let down from this height; i was at my old tricks, the selfish member of a selfish society” (p. 205). emerson does not expect some final knowledge, as “the life of man is a self-evolving circle, which, from a ring imperceptibly small, rushes on all sides outwards to new and larger circles, and that without end,” (p. 404) suggesting a series of ongoing expansions where the self is redefined in a greater whole, placing an emphasis on flux and creative growth and becoming. emerson has an important place for receptivity and passivity, and he writes “our thinking is a pious reception,” (pp. 418-419) and of the “abandonment to the nature of things,” (p. 459) and that we must learn to trust our intuition. lawrence buell remarks that emerson “was drawn to models of conduct that deemphasized conscious choice in favor of attention to an inner voice” (buell, 2004, p. 73). each of us has her own path; for example, emerson (1983) writes “insist on yourself; never imitate” (p. 278). for emerson, creative expression is important and, as shown when he remarks that “the man is only half himself, the other half is his expression,” (p. 448) and his spiritual perspectives are in the here and now, as indicated when he writes “the invariable mark of wisdom is to see the miraculous in the common” (p. 47). although, as discussed above, for emerson a crisis or challenging situation may be a spur towards creative change, it is also vital to draw upon one’s own resources to encourage a meaningful life. in this respect, although profound receptivity is important for emerson’s thought, so is a concerted and conscious effort to help wean oneself away from habitual tendencies and encourage deeper reflection and receptivity. however, the model for this is not that of rational self-mastery (although this may play a part) that maclaren raises some concerns about, but rather konchak journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 9 8 opening towards the experience of the authentic and spiritual depths of oneself and the creative impetus and change that comes from this experience. discussion although maclaren, gadamer, and emerson present different theoretical positions, selftransformation is an important aspect of all three thinker’s perspectives, albeit they go about it in different ways. in this section, i will explore an example of how each position may complement the others. although maclaren’s points to the importance of authentic passions, in her account, authentic passions are something that happen to us and are not of our choosing. as such, she does not suggest as a normative conclusion that we are to strive to be authentic and avoid emotional clichés. in this respect, she writes, “because we are habitual beings, we will always and inevitably experience emotional clichés” (maclaren, 2011, p. 63). maclaren, although raising concerns about cognitive theories of emotion, also points out that they have an important point in terms of individual choice and taking responsibility for our emotions. maclaren writes: an essential task, then, in dealing with our emotions is to ask what judgments they enact, whether the situation could have been determined in other ways, and what the particular route that we were compelled to take reveals about ourselves and our relations with our environment. through this kind of reflection, and through a commitment to developing new habits of making sense of ourselves, others, and the world, we can in fact transform ourselves and become people who are regularly moved to take up the world in ways that better recognize and respect the reality of our interpersonal situations and the people with whom we live. though we may be condemned to emotional clichés, we need not be condemned to constantly reiterating ourselves and reinscribing the same problematic ways of being with others (p. 63) however, she also recognizes the need for compassion in this process due to the challenges involved and the need for support and new resources to be established that promote transformation. maclaren (2009) discusses the process of becoming a subject and how this involves moving beyond absolute towards more relative and flexible conceptions of self. these points of view would seem to find resonance both with gadamer’s standpoint of moving past our dogmatic conceptions towards more open perspectives and emerson’s viewpoint of moving beyond our habits towards dynamic change and flexible perspectives that are always evolving. for both gadamer and emerson, like maclaren, the need to manage our everyday reactions, judgments, and prejudices are also important. to give a practical example, let us look at jealousy and competition in a broad sense, where someone has something that one wishes that one could have or one is too concerned about one’s standing in relation to others, too often leading to envy, anger, and resentment, this no doubt being a good example of an emotional cliché or of rigid representational thoughts or judgments. gadamer explains that for plato, the concern for the facts of the matter in the process of shared understanding excludes phthonos, which gadamer defines as: konchak journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 9 9 phthonos (see the interpretation of philebus 48ff below)1 means concern about being ahead of others or not being left behind by others. as such, its effect in conversation is to cause an apprehensive holding back from talk that presses toward discovering the true state of affairs. so talk that is guided by this kind of consideration for oneself is characterized by a proviso: that the talk about the facts of the matter should reflect back on the talker in a way that distinguishes him or her in a positive way. this proviso prevents the talk from adapting freely to the connections in the subject matter and thus prevents, precisely, an unreserved readiness to give an account. (gadamer, 1931/1991, pp. 44-45) the concern here is that because of attachment to one’s own status in relation to others and conceptions of oneself, one may hold to dogmatic conceptions rather than staying with the subject matter and giving an account based on this. although this is from an early work of gadamer’s on plato, it is suggested that this may be an important aspect of a hermeneutic approach2 of moving towards more openness to the other in that it may help loosen reasons for holding onto dogmatic perspectives (e.g., competition with others, wanting to be ahead, etc.), helping to encourage self-transformation. for gadamer, the orientation of openness to the other and following the subject matter is something that must be continually worked at so that one does not blindly fall into repeating habitual judgments and prejudices; rather, one is to bring prejudices into play for potential revision. in his discussion of phthonos in his interpretation of the passages of the philebus mentioned above, gadamer seems to be emphasizing the problem of an ill-will towards others and competitive orientation, and he explains: so phthonos can be understood in the widest sense as: in being toward others, looking back at oneself and determining one’s being toward them on the basis of this concerned regard for oneself. its contrary can be understood, formally, as the absence of such a regard—not really as the “not begrudging” that looks back just as much but as a being toward something shared which is not contestable (is not withheld from the other person when one possesses it oneself); or, still more exactly, whose possession does not distinguish one of us over the other because it is something in which you and i are alike, are the same (psychē, auto). (p. 186, footnote 28, emphasis in original). in his interpretation, gadamer seems to be emphasizing moving past comparing and competing with others to both help reveal the subject matter in conversation and enable a reorientation towards things that are shared between people in their commonality. in respect to the latter, let us briefly consider gadamer’s aesthetics. for example, his conception of the festival is also a perspective that moves past our everyday purposes and identities towards more holistic experience and commonality, his conception of the tragic is something that points towards experiences that are common to all, and theoria with its emphasis on participation, more 1 pages 183-186, where gadamer explores phthonos further. 2 for example, dostal (2010) points to the importance of gadamer’s greek studies and especially those on plato for gadamer’s own hermeneutic thought. kidder (1995) writes: “it is recognized now that gadamer’s lifelong companionship with greek philosophy has profoundly affected his thought, such that it is impossible to understand his ‘original’ contributions in separation from his scholarly interpretations” (p. 83). konchak journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 9 10 relational perspectives, and commonality also points in this direction (see gadamer, 1977/1986, 1960/1989). these are all conceptions that may promote a practical re-orientation away from perspectives such as competition and jealousy and their focus on things that some have to the exclusion of others, towards what people have in common. in this respect, gadamer’s emphasis here seems to be less on learning not to be jealous about specific things, but rather points towards a more radical re-orientation towards commonality, a shift that can be seen as part of the selftransformative practice of hermeneutics and part of a hermeneutic “way of life.” here hermeneutic theory informs hermeneutic practice. in respect to jealousy, emerson (1983) has a different account of how to look at the situation when we see someone who has something we do not, one that moves beyond envy: if i feel overshadowed and outdone by great neighbours, i can yet love; i can still receive; and he that loveth maketh his own the grandeur he loves. thereby i make the discovery that my brother is my guardian, acting for me with the friendliest designs, and the estate i so admired and envied is my own. (p. 301) on emerson’s account, when someone else has something, they have actualized it whereas we have this in potential. contributing to emerson’s conception is that our inner state of mind is reflected in our outer experiences and we are all divine and are interconnected, and so we can look towards our commonwealth to find resources. that is why emerson can write “the young man reveres men of genius, because, to speak truly, they are more himself than he is. they receive of the soul as he also receives, but they more” (p. 448). the moral of this for emerson is that we can learn from others, who remind us of our own depths and resources so that we can bring to expression a creative life in our own unique way, and if we all did this we would individually and collectively live richer lives. in this case, a situation that could “normally” elicit envy is transformed by having the resources to make a positive inner choice to reframe the situation, which may lead towards potential growth. maclaren (2009) draws on case studies with children experiencing sibling rivalry and jealousy at the arrival of a new baby in the family, and her interpretation points to the importance that those around them help give them opportunities to redefine their roles, the bodily aspects of this, and the positive transformation this may encourage. emerson’s approach is more oriented within a spiritual conception and individual choice, whereas maclaren’s is bodily-based and centered around on a change in the environment, but both point towards positive reframing that encourages positive transformation, and both point to resources in the environment that may encourage a change in our lived logic. in this respect, william james points to the importance of both the individual and community: “the community stagnates without the impulse of the individual. the impulse dies away without the sympathy of the community” (james, 1897/1956, p. 232). this brings us back to the importance of both making individual choices and developing supportive and compassionate communities that encourage positive individual and collective experience, and maclaren, gadamer, and emerson each have important perspectives to help encourage this. each thinker highlights important aspects and together provides a more holistic account of dynamic change and self-transformation which incorporates accounts of receptivity, conscious choice, experiences of interconnection (be they bodily, linguistic, or spiritual), profound experiences of nature and aesthetic experience, the need for both individual and collective impetus and support for change, and other aspects. this can be seen as part of a lived practice and philosophy as a way of life, where both individual and konchak journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 9 11 collective efforts may be made to work towards moving past dogmatic points of view (be they individual or collective) which may not serve, encouraging a move towards more relational perspectives and more meaningful relations that support individual and collective flourishing. conclusion in closing, maclaren, gadamer, and emerson all point towards developing more holistic conceptions of self and community that may help lead towards positive transformation. it has been suggested that these approaches can be related to hadot’s conception of philosophy as a way of life, where the emphasis of philosophy is to promote practical change, and how each of these three thinkers provides valuable resources in this respect. while maclaren emphasizes the body, gadamer language (mind), and emerson spirit, the divide between body/mind/spirit is somewhat artificial as these are all deeply intertwined, and each thinker has aspects to their thought that overlap and reach beyond this simple categorization. however, it is also suggested that there is an important point in emphasizing the differences as well, as each approach can reveal (and conceal) aspects of experience and taken together can provide a more holistic account of experience that may collectively encourage transformation and human flourishing. acknowledgement i want to thank david greenham for comments he made on an earlier version of this paper. this work was supported by the icelandic research fund (grant number 152521-051). references buell, l. (2004). emerson. cambridge, ma: belknap press of harvard university press. dostal, r. (2010). gadamer's platonism: his recovery of mimesis and anamnesis. in j. malpas, & s. zabala (eds.), the consequences of hermeneutics: fifty years after gadamer's truth and method (pp. 45-65). evanston, il: northwestern university press. emerson, r.w. (1983). emerson: essays and lectures (j. porte, ed.). new york, ny: library of america. gadamer, h-g. (1931/1991). plato's dialectical ethics: phenomenological interpretations relating to the philebus. (r. m. wallace, trans.) new haven, ct: yale university press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd. rev. ed.). (j. weinsheimer, & d. g. marshall, trans.) london, uk: sheed and ward. gadamer, h-g. (1977/1986). the relevance of the beautiful. in r. bernasoni (ed.), the relevance of the beautiful and other essays (n. walker, trans., pp. 3-53). cambridge, uk: cambridge university press. konchak journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 9 12 hadot, p. (1995). philosophy as a way of life: spiritual exercises from socrates to foucault. (m. chase, trans.) malden, ma: blackwell publishing lit. hadot, p. (1995/2004). what is ancient philosophy?(m. chase, trans.). cambridge, ma: belknap press of harvard university press. james, w. (1897/1956). great men and their environment. in w. james, the will to believe and other essays in popular philsophy and human immortality both books bound as one (pp. 216254). new york, ny: dover publications, inc. kidder, p. (1995, spring). gadamer and the platonic eidos. philosophy today, 39(1), 83-92. maclaren, k. (2009). emotional metamorphoses: the role of others in becoming a subject. in s. campbell, l. meynell, & s. sherwin (eds.), embodiment and agency (pp. 25-45). university park, pa: pennsylvania state university press. maclaren, k. (2011). emotional clichés and authentic passions: a phenomenological revision of a cognitive theory of emotion. phenomenology and the cognitive sciences(10), 45-65. thoreau, h.d. (1854/2004). walden and other writings. (j. w. krutch, ed.) new york, ny: bantam dell. microsoft word humphriescorrectedfinal.docx corresponding author: joan m. humphries email: humphriesj@camosun.bc.ca journal of applied hermeneutics august 7, 2012 the author(s) 2012 like a melody it passes: dasein and perinatal well-being joan m. humphries abstract in this paper, the text found in johannes brahms’ wie melodien zieht es (like a melody it passes) serves as a metaphor for selected key ideas that comprise heidegger’s being and time. heidegger’s conceptualization of dasein (including being and temporality) is examined in the context of the poetry and applied to understandings of maternal emotional well-being. there is potential for increased insight based on analysis of these selected key concepts, which are described and related to the experience of becoming a mother. there is also significance in examining birthing because of current realities involved in maternity care, which include standardized approaches to care. the poetry of wie melodien zieht es guides the flow of ideas that are outlined during the paper. the need for enhanced authentic interactions between nurses and women in the perinatal period is exposed, engaging heideggerian thought as a framework for possible enlightenment. keywords birthing, brahms, breastfeeding promotion, heidegger, hermeneutics, perinatal health, poetry who can say why we connect ideas in the way that we do? hermeneutic scholar david jardine (2012) wrote of the “crisscrossing” that occurs when memories collide with current impressions, and create profound resonance. with that, there can be a suggestion of something transpiring that is pre-ordained, perhaps having to do with an understanding that seems as though it was meant to unfold in the form of a realization, and which presents itself joyfully. all of this occurs en route to a process of “becoming” and an “opening into" what may already be (jardine, 2012). i had such an experience when reading heidegger’s being and time (1927/2010) for the first time, because during that process, i could not ignore the other influences in my life that permeated my understanding of heidegger’s work. it happened, for exhumphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 2 ample, that at the same time as i was introduced to heideggerian thought, i was studying a piece of vocal music, written by johannes brahms (1833-1897) entitled wie melodien zieht es mir, or, like a melody it passes. in the context of my exposure to heidegger, the text of the song (written by the poet groth) appeared to me with unexpected freshness. more importantly, the meaning of the poetry aligned with my evolving understandings of heideggerian thought as reflected in stambaugh’s translation of being and time (heidegger, 1927/2010), the edition of that work that is referenced in this paper. the perinatal experience and the emotional well-being of women in the perinatal sphere are never distant in my attention as i engage in academic inquiry. the term “wellbeing” takes on a new significance following exposure to heidegger’s work, in which embedded underpinnings of being permeate understanding and thought. in the perinatal field, emotional well-being of women is often contextualized by care providers to conform to the accepted wisdom of bio-physical standards that distinguish “baby blues” from clinical depression. evidence-based assessment tools, such as the edinburgh depression scale, are often employed to ascertain which women fall into the category of clinical depression as compared with those whose feelings are deemed less worrisome (beck & watson driscoll, 2006; nicolson, 1998). however my history in working with women points towards a notion wherein there is more than a medical diagnosis, or lack thereof, to value about a woman’s emotional well-being, and her experience of her birthing. reading heidegger, in particular his attention to the unique histories that we live through, reinforced a thread of understanding about the magnitude of meaning that exists for a woman about her birthing experience, connecting with the central ideas of being and dasein that heidegger described. so, the fusion of three apparently disparate bodies of thought has presented as a “criss-crossing” around heideggerian philosophy, art song, and the birthing experience. in this paper, i use the poetry of wie melodien zieht es to guide a beginning approach to heidegger’s being and time, connecting the very deep and central human experience of birth with heidegger’s notions of being, dasein, and other key concepts that are central to that work. i describe how the interweaving of heidegger, brahms, and women’s experience of birth has influenced my impressions about current approaches to nursing care in the perinatal setting. initial reflections throughout the reading of being and time, i was aware of gleaning insidious understandings as the reading progressed, often in ways that were (and remain) difficult to articulate, but in ways that would flood my consciousness at unexpected times in my everyday life. the significance of these everyday awakenings has meaning, for according to heidegger, our lives are intelligible only through the interpretation of the everyday (dreyfus, 1992). however, paley (1998) speculated that heidegger’s views on realism and positivism have been largely misinterpreted by nurse scholars, who (according to paley) have the tendency to frame studies based in heideggerian philosophy in the paradigm of everyday “lived experience” only, thereby overlooking the realist possibilities that heidegger may have sanctioned. paley cautioned that any attempt to equate heidegger’s “everyday” meanings with a movement away from realism is a mistaken cartesian approach, since that stance would involve splitting experience away from reality. nonetheless i proceed, reasoning that humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 3 it is indeed my everyday lived experience of reading being and time that underpins my thinking, without presumption to authoritatively analyse the intentions of heideggerian thought in the context of realism, positivism, constructivism, or any other approach to the worldliness that heidegger envisioned. in this paper, in keeping with the notion of criss-crossing ideas and the experience of making meaning, i share the reflections (in italics) that shape my thoughts and depict a poetic-like interruption. i felt a sense meaning wash over me in this process. it’s not as though i would profess to regurgitate the meaning of heidegger’s work, but rather his words beckoned me, invited me, to recognize meanings of my own. sprinklings of familiarity tease me, they trickle ever closer, until i welcome the rhythmical dripdrop of revelation within me, infusing my most intimate self with floods of memories of what it is to be...lying on the grass as a child and gazing at the clouds rolling by.... and thinking “i am.” in hermeneutics, there is an underpinning of understanding concerning the part and the whole. the significance of employing this understanding can be far-reaching, for when considering any phenomena, our attention may be drawn to what may lie beneath, or around, what is easily visible to us. heidegger explained: apart from the fact that the moon is never wholly to be grasped even when it is full, the not-yet by no means signifies a not-yet-being-together of parts belonging together, but rather pertains only to the way we grasp it perceptually. (2010, p. 234) it follows that as i consider my nursing experience and academic focus, i am acutely aware of the profound challenges that women face in the course of the birthing experience, many of which may not appear with transparency or totality. among other concerns, i wonder how our maternity settings are able to address the complexity of birthing. my extensive experience as a registered nurse in the maternal/child field in canada fuels my perspective. my impressions have emerged over time while functioning as a nurse alongside midwives and physicians who share the culture of maternity care that currently exists, and who are also accountable to the systemic requirements that i describe. indeed, we live in a time where much of the nursing care has become driven by the desire to “normalize” the event according to a set of institutional policies and practices, which are based on statistical population health imperatives combined with overarching budgetary guidelines, all of which have the potential to be narrowly interpreted. i consider the seminal event that birthing represents in a woman’s life, and i wonder in what ways our efficient hospital processes interrupt the potential for accessing the depth of experience that has occurred for a woman in the course of the birthing event. jardine (1992) described the desire to understand experience, writing: understood interpretively, such incidents can have a generative and re-enlivening effect on the interweaving texts and textures of human life in which we are all embedded. bringing out these living interweavings in their full, ambiguous, multivocal character is the task of interpretation. (p. 51) buoyed by jardine’s urge to expose the multivocal character that i associate with birthing, i speculate that any disruption in the communion of the birth experience into behumphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 4 ing will indeed comprise a woman’s history. importantly, this history will be lived again and again, tempering a woman’s understandings, as her existence unfolds (bergum, 1989). being and dasein i work toward an understanding of heidegger’s ontological primacy of being. heidegger invites us to enter in to this understanding with the unique language that disrupts what may be taken-for-granted meanings. the distinctiveness of being seeps unapologetically into heidegger’s reconfiguration of the vernacular understandings of that word, while making explicit a centrality of human experience that he believes has been overlooked in philosophic thought from the ancients to today. heidegger’s focus on being is an idea that is at once familiar and distant, profound and yet everyday. to contemplate being a being is to confront the most basal of mysteries in life; that deep, unfathomable awareness of existence (dasein) that we live with, and live through. heidegger is clear that being, in a gestalt-like experience, marks ontological meaning in its purest, most superior sense. that understanding is distinguished from other philosophic thought by nature of that basic and essential insight. it is through his attempt to explicate being that heidegger is said to have altered the direction of philosophic thought, since his approach transcends historic tendencies to characterize knowledge and reality based on, for example, rational and perceptual binaries (blattner, 2006; caputo, 1987). heidegger was also antagonistic towards ethics as an uncontested entity, seeing them as embedded with value-laden and prescriptive rules for conduct (caputo, 1987). one appreciation pervades my quest to gain further understanding of being and dasein. that is, i recognize that heidegger’s dasein is described as though personified, and yet explained as ontologically constituted of self and being (blattner, 2006). dasein seems to assume a muse-like presence that is paradoxically integrated into self, into being. caputo (1987) noted: everything in being and time turns on getting this initial projection right. dasein must be cast in the appropriate terms, projected upon the being which lets it be the being which it is, lest the whole subsequent discussion founder. (p. 66) the possibility of this dasein, as though existence has a personality and a will of sorts unto itself, is an intriguing and playful approach, and sustains a thread of coherence for me. heidegger made a defining statement, however, when he wrote: “however, the ‘substance’ of human being is not spirit as the synthesis of body and soul; it is rather existence.” (p. 114. italics and quotation marks in original). in this statement, he interrupts any potential misconception that dasein could represent some form of dualistic presence. rather, we are invited to incorporate notions of dasein into a unified presence with self-and others-in-the-world (blattner, 2006). the song my exposure to many of heidegger’s german words in stambaugh’s translation of being and time made the study of the text of wie melodien zieht es all the more captivating. the initial insight was overwhelming as i practiced the song in preparation for my weekly singing lesson. i wonder, in retrospect if my exposure to german terms, in combination with the concurrent reading of heidegger, served as some kind of “preunderstanding.” in any case, when learning a humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 5 piece of music that is set with a text that is foreign to me, it is necessary for me to approach the somewhat onerous process of memorizing and pronouncing words in a language that i do not speak. as is the case for any music student, it was important to understand the translated version of the poetic text to the song, and it was in that process that i became awed as the translated words to the piece assumed a multi-faceted possibility for enhanced understanding of a deep human experience (see appendix 1). the following description summarizes the piece briefly: the message of a tear-filled eye is the subject of wie melodien zieht es mir, by klaus groth (1819-99). before closing on a major, the song's three varied verses each end on a different harmony, showing brahms' predilection for developing variation. (“johannes brahms. 5 lieder,” 2008) the poet groth lived before heidegger, but exposure to groth’s poetry prompted a certain resonance with the experience of reading heidegger’s being and time. by this, i mean that in both cases, some kind of understanding about the core of human experience entered into my personhood-my being-in ways that were surely authentic and deep within me. when encountering heidegger’s work, i was required to re-read many passages before i was able to grasp a sense of significance. the same repetitive energy was required in reading groth’s text. the beauty of braham’s melody, too, erupts after many exposures, with its twists and turns of musical splendour, linking the piano accompaniment inextricably with the lyric. all of it creates the potential for true ensemble, true unity, yet with unexpected harmonic resolution between the singer and the pianist. in reference to unity, heidegger stated: “in the everyday ‘just passing through life’ that takes care, dasein never understands itself as running along in a continuously enduring succession of sheer ‘nows’” (2010, p. 390). in that statement, heidegger cautions that unity of meaning demands something more than mere attention to sequence. rather, the stretching of perceptions of time and events must always be interpreted by dasein in the fullness of its existence, much like appreciation for the finality of melody in the context of its composites. for example, within any melody, there are notes that make up the phrase, and phrases that make up the melody, signifying a musical part that contributes a mysterious temporality, and lingers en route to the whole of the melody and the song. each note comes and goes quickly, each one replacing the last, while on its way to the whole phrase. the unity of melody is emerging. how fascinating is the miracle of melodic creation, replete with so many facets of individuality, sensibility, historical style, and other characteristics that speak to us, and access our experience of being! the above explanation of wie melodien, with regards to the predilection for creating variation in harmony, also resounds with meaning as i consider the meaning of my exposure to being and time. there were many twists and turns and forays into unexpected thought as the reading progressed, with all of them leading back to the perfection of dasein and being. indeed, these ideas offered something of a conceptual resolution for me, a return to something familiar, as is found in the unexpected but relieving sense of harmonic resolution that brahms offers in wie melodien. when considering my own musical sensibilities, it is often those unexpected harmonic resolutions that constitute any sense of beauty that i associate with a piece of music. so, too, is the sense of awe that unfolded for me in the humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 6 reading of heidegger, nudging me to contemplate yet again the miracle associated with that moment when birth occurs. the inevitable wonder surrounding the first cry and the marvel of a process that allows a woman’s body to house and release a new human life a new being reveals itself each time as an extraordinary experience. how can i describe the sense of unity that overcomes me? so many ideas, so many fragments to incorporate! but it cannot be about the conscious putting together, it must be about the momentthe gasp of recognition-the lightning bolt. there is surely mystery in all of this. heidegger and poetry a wonderful symmetry exists between poetry and heideggerian thought (heidegger, 1971). it seems that heidegger valued poetic thought and the exquisite possibility for the deepest of human expression that lies therein. the primacy and meaning that heidegger ascribed to art and poetry is exposed in heidegger’s (1971) work poetry, language, and thought. heidegger said: “art happens as poetry. poetry is founding in the triple sense of bestowing, grounding and beginning” (p. 75). he also wrote: singing and thinking are the stems neighbor to poetry they grow out of being and reach into its truth. (p. 13) as i read these words, i speculate that his words capture the trinity of connections that i make between poetry and mothers’ being that exist alongside song and the act of singing. i wonder further what personal truths about women’s birthing experience have the potential to be revealed. i consider the possible barriers to harmonious experience that results for both women and nurses based on the models that are currently conceptualized and practiced. groth, heidegger, and mother’s meaning revealing and concealing; a mother’s experience wie melodien zieht es mir leise durch den sinn, wie frühlings blumen blüht es, und schwebt wie duft dahin like a melody it passes softly through my mind, like the flowers of spring it blooms, and floats on like a fragrance the opening words to the poem are intriguing and invite further conjecture. the suggestion of something passing through one’s mind, such as a melody, invokes a sense of mystery. when contemplating the experience of melody, i am transfixed by the awareness of pattern that evolves in the process of melodic creation, harkening back to heideggerian references to the part and the whole. in the process of contemplating melody, there is indeed a sense of mutuality between the individual notes and phrases, and the composite melody that transpires as a result. i have come to consider that one of heidegger’s conceptual underpinnings is the notion of revealing and concealing, which suggests disclosedness, or sense of revealing (enthullen) that emerges from that which is hidden, constituting our being-in-the-world. in the context of my ruminations, the revelation concerns understanding, mood, and language. we are primordially familiar with our world, a situation that heidegger expresses as “primordial truth” (blattner, humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 7 2006). according to blattner, “primordial truth is the world disclosive function of our basic familiarity” (p. 13). heidegger posited: but what remains concealed in an exceptional sense, or what falls back and is covered up (verdeckung) again, or shows itself only in a disguised (verstellt) way, is not this or that being but rather, as we have shown in our foregoing observations, the being of beings. it can be covered up to such a degree that it is forgotten and the question about it and its meaning altogether omitted. (2010, authors’ italics, p. 33) women’s experience of giving birth can be likened to a primordial and transformational way of experiencing being. however, there is much that is revealed and concealed along the way. within groth’s poetic references to flowering and spring, too, there are suggestions of revealing and concealing, when considering that flowering reveals the potential of the bud, or that the inevitability of spring is hidden in the bleakness of winter. so too, the advent of motherhood may well uncover new and tender emotions toward the infant, reminiscent of groth’s suggestion of the flowering of something fresh and lovely, rife with the birth and re-birth that is associated with spring. bergum (1989) suggested: “the woman is changed by the experience of bearing a child. she is not a mere vessel, but is an active, growing, changing participant” (p. 154). “woman” becomes “mother” (bergum, 1989). with that unfolding, that revelation, a new mother may also experience the bleak fear associated with expectations for perfect mothering (wolf, 2010). i wonder if the deep and central need for women to assimilate and take-in the experience of birth has been overlooked by adhering to practices such as early discharge policy or “rooming-in” practices (wherein the infant stays in the mother’s room in spite of traumatic birth or caesarean section). i question how our hospital environments allow for revealing the difficulties associated with emotional recovery following a traumatic delivery. a woman’s recuperation from a post-partum hemorrhage, for example, or other complications of the birth experience, is linked with an increased incidence of post-partum depression (thompson, roberts, & ellwood, 2011; white, 2006). do those images further the notions of blossoming (the revelation of a flowering into motherhood) or do they “float” on some elusive odor, inclined to conceal and sublimate such possibilities as an emerging depression? in keeping with the attempt to envision the totality of a woman’s experience, whether a clinical depression has been diagnosed or not, it is reasonable to suspect that a woman will incorporate any distressing aspect of her birthing into her own history and continue to process its meaning for a long time to come. as i consider the current culture of maternity care, i think of other taken-forgranted practices that consume the efforts of nurses working in the perinatal field. the attention to the protection of breastfeeding practice underpins much of the support that is given to women by nurses in the hospital setting as well as the community. the rhetoric of breast milk superiority is revealed as the most important consideration for women in the early mothering experience, but what may be concealed is the need for consideration of individual contextual considerations around infant feeding decisions (humphries, 2011; humphries & mcdonald, 2012). where rooming in is concerned, the advantages are exposed as being important to a new mother’s ability to learn about her infant’s cues so that mothering and breastfeeding can be supported. while elements of this strategy are certainly important for many women, other advantages of the policy are not as easily revealed. for example, women humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 8 may share a room with another mother whose infant is up at night crying, minimizing the hope of sleep for all concerned. this in turn may motivate a woman to request discharge before she is quite ready in order to get home where she imagines she will be better able to cope. she might then be discharged before her transitional milk supply has been established, leaving her to face the unexpected feeding challenges associated with those adjustments in isolation. also, there are expectations for a practitioner regarding discharge parameters, for it is expected that women will be discharged as soon as is deemed medically appropriate (sadeh-mestechkin, walwsch, zeadna et al., 2007). the importance of emotional upheaval and sleep deprivation that accompany the early days following birth can be therefore concealed, undermined, and dismissed as part of the normal experience. the possible advantages to enhancing a woman’s capacities for coping by nurturing her and supporting her healing for a longer time period are trumped by budgetary imperatives for early discharge that may subvert the wishes of nurses and mothers who recognize a need for enhanced support. i have outlined the very external applications (or, ontic applications, as heidegger may describe them) of the words “revealing” and “concealing” as a way of describing my musings about women’s experience of birth in maternity settings. however, what may be closest to heideggerian thought, as well as the poetic notions of groth, involve what is transpiring on a very deep level a level that reflects what is revealed and concealed closer to a woman’s being-about the transformation into motherhood. oenninghodson (2007) offered insight into the complexity of maternal dasein when referring to a healthy third space that may exist between mother and infant, enabling each to develop a unique sense of self. in the context of this discussion, it is possible to connect that healthy sense of self with dasein. personal truths will reveal the meaning that a woman makes about motherhood, and that meaning will be profound and long lasting. the fragrance of her birth experience, whether that fragrance is sweet or pungent, will be inhaled and re-inhaled, with revelations punctuating the meaning of her existence--her dasein--over a lifetime. nurses’ encounters, too, will participate in the criss-crossing that will ultimately shape their impressions, as well as the impressions of the women they care for. bergum (1989) asked: “what does it mean to be a health care professional in the midst of women’s transformative experiences?” (p. 15). in partial response to bergum’s question, i suggest that women very often remember their nurses during the pivotal time of birthing. they recall the kindness or the insensitivity, or any number of nursing interactions, and they will incorporate their shared history with nurses into a dasein that becomes inextricably linked with the birth experience. indeed, a woman’s encounter with nurses in the perinatal period assumes a large profile in the meaning she makes of the perinatal experience (humphries, 2011). as a result of the relational interaction that occurs between nurses and women in the perinatal setting, women may enter into an everyday blossoming that unfolds with feelings of successful and blessed mothering. however, if nurses do not handle breastfeeding difficulties sensitively, or fail to recognize an emerging depression, there can be movement towards a concealed state, wherein a withering, or retreat occurs, and an erosion of self-confidence transpires (humphries, 2011; humphries & mcdonald, 2012; wolf, 2011). for some nurses, there can be a sense that adherence to guidelines for institutional humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 9 efficiency and best-practice guidelines conceal a personal opportunity for sensitive and individual advocacy. in fact, this notion was revealed to me after decades of floating on the odorous sensibility of efficiency and evidence-based practice, which is generally thought to offer excellence for nursing care in the perinatal setting. the screams of her birthing had been silenced by the cries of her infant, born blessedly healthy and now voraciously hungry. i encouraged her, i uplifted her, and i gave her confidence. “your milk will come in, the baby will latch, don’t give up,” was my assurance. the desperation of the labor was now surely forgotten-it had been, after all, three days since her emergency cesarean birth. i was cheerful and informative as i skillfully removed the staples from her abdominal wound, preparing her for discharge that day, not thinking until much later about the lost look in her eyes. perinatal worldliness, mood, and language doch kommt das wort und fasst es und fuhrt es vor das aug‘, wie nebelgrau er blasst es und schwindet wie ein hauch but the word comes and seizes it and brings it before my eyes like the gray mist it pales then, and vanishes like a breath. the metaphor of the melody continues to be engrossing as it relates to heidegger’s discussion of language and its complicity with both specific and broad constructs of linguistics and meaning. heidegger’s thoughts about language indeed add a further dimension to the notion of melody since language, like melody, is made up of individual parts that achieve meaning only in the completeness of the whole. according to blattner (2006), heidegger embraced “linguistic constitutivism,” (p. 98) a view that is shared by many 20th century philosophers, and one that acknowledges the centrality of language to our being-in-the-world. heidegger implied, however, that there is more to language than mere linguistics, and that any meaning associated with discourse must include the broader sense of the term language, and acknowledge the way that we speak (blattner, 2006). at the same time, then, the intentionality of language towards communication can be realized through art, dance, intonation, speed of speech, and other descriptors (blatter, 2006). i believe the temporality of language is thus revealed, by considering the complexity, contradiction, and possibility for alternative presentation that exists in the moment around language, but for which there is always a sense of completion that incorporates the history as well as the novelty of that moment. it is the completeness of communication that will shape the history of the birth event, aligning with the fundamental position that is assumed by language, understood in a broad sense, during the perinatal experience. in the passage above, groth’s poetry suggests a touch of the interrupted. something has been seized by the word, and i am infused with a sense of the authoritative voice. the melody is now disrupted by the lyrics. interweaving my thoughts around the perinatal encounter, it seems there are many words and messages that embody birthing, and many of them take on authoritative significance. there are written and unwritten words and messages that manifest through the guidelines and policies (as have been described) that underpin nurses’ approach to care. these words spring forth from the humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 10 posters on the wall about breastfeeding superiority, seraphic images of women breastfeeding their infants, information about how to care for the infant safely, words of caution from pre-natal education and a myriad of online influences that accompany a woman to her birth experience. there are also very important words that are not present, and equally influential, by nature of the fact that images or posters of bottles, latex nipples and formula are forbidden in maternity settings, in alignment with baby friendly initiatives (breastfeeding committee for canada, 2011). indeed, many women arrive at their birthing with a high level of anxiety around the responsibilities that await, after a pregnancy that has included a rigorous expectation of specific abstinences, avoidances, and worries over the health of the unborn infant brought on by increasing technological proficiency (wolf, 2010; wynn, 2002). is it possible that these experiences of pregnancy set the stage for an interrupted assimilation of the fetus into the mother’s being? is it possible that these words-these influencesseize the melody of motherhood and distort it into cacophony? heidegger’s attention to attunement and mood were concepts that took me by surprise as i read being and time. heidegger implied that the understanding of mood occupies a crucial place in conceptions of dasein, and he suggested that fear is an important component to understandings of mood. in his discussion of mood, heidegger used the term “attunement” to contrast any “turning away” from dasein. heidegger described those two ideas: in bad moods, dasein becomes blind to itself, the surrounding world of heedfulness, is veiled, the circumspection of taking care is led astray. attunement is so far from being reflected upon that, in the unreflected devotion to and giving in to the “world” of its heedfulness, it assails dasein. mood assails. (2010, p. 133) my surprise arose partially as i considered how mood is often taken up in an everyday interpretation of the word, usually implying a negative or positive judgment about a person’s orientation towards happiness. there is also an objectified, medicalized connotation that springs easily to mind, especially when considering the onset of a mood disorder in the perinatal period. it was intriguing to me that heidegger would attribute so much meaning to mood, an accessible idea that i had not expected to occupy such an intrinsic position associated with being. in fact, new insights emerge around attunement as a result of heidegger’s discussion of fear, anxiety, and the “turning away from and toward one’s own dasein” (2010, p. 325) that discloses mood. i see with a new lens the possibilities for meaning around fear and anxiety, as representing inauthentic (or turning away from dasein) responses to in-themoment situations, and the implications for mood that ensue. i am called again to examine the potential for regimented and possibly disruptive approaches to birth in the context of “turning away” from the deeply seminal and personal experience that birth is. heidegger’s reference to mood and its apparent relationship to our human perspectives give me pause, and i discern a coherent connection between his words and my ruminations about women and their birth experience. in particular, i connect the “grey mist” to which groth referred, with women’s experience of post-partum depression that i encountered in my hermeneutic study (humphries & mcdonald, 2012). in that study, i explored the experience of women who lived with mood disorders and who were not able to breastfeed their infants. their experiences had most often included humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 11 valiant attempts to achieve success with breastfeeding, but they had struggled with what heidegger may equate to the “presentat-hand” notions of breastfeeding (mcbride, white, & benn, 2009). in other words, these women were unable to incorporate the functional aspect of the breasts (or what heidegger may refer to as the “equipment” that breasts may signify) with the act of successfully breastfeeding. an integrated notion of dasein was compromised because of specific challenges these women faced, such as a failure to achieve a latch with the infant, or difficulties with achieving satisfactory milk supply from the breasts. in another crisscross of ideas, i think about the words emanating from breastfeeding promotional literature that haunted these women, especially references to the statistically derived advantages of breastfeeding towards enhancing the infant’s intelligence, preventing sudden infant death syndrome (sids) or reducing the risk for a multitude of other diseases. women suffered significant emotional distress as a result of their exposure to breastfeeding promotional literature when they, themselves could not breastfeed. heidegger’s resistance to the ethics of modernity (caputo, 1987) comes to mind as the widespread acceptance of “informed consent” in the context of infant feeding decisions emerges. in other words, it is assumed that by giving women the evidence about risks associated with not breastfeeding, ethical imperatives can be satisfied. groth’s poetry aligned with my interpretation of women’s confidence withering and “vanishing like a breath” while striving to fulfill expectations created by the language of best practice guidelines enacted by the nurses, and of breastfeeding promotional initiatives that they encountered in their communities. it was difficult to bear the suffering that was part of their experience. the academic language of postpartum depression in no way prepared me to be immersed in the pain of a fractured dream of motherhood... and i was left altered. so many of their worries centered on a sense of failure that they couldn’t feed their babies properly-so many words that had led them to their “truth” that by using formula they had damaged their beloved infants forever. maternal dasein and temporality und dennoch ruht im reime verborgen wohl ein duft den mild aus stillem keime ein feuchtes auge ruft. and yet there’s in the rhyme a fragrance deeply hidden that gently from a dormant bud is called forth by tear-stained eyes. i am now able to rest with groth’s poetry, which concludes in concert with the melodic resolution that is occurring simultaneously, depicting the bittersweet conclusion. what is “it” that passes like a melody? the reading and the re-reading of the poem led me through layers of possibility; ones that pertain to the disclosure of love, or the passage into wisdom, all the while employing the metaphor of the power of melody and lyrics to elicit human emotion. underscoring all possibilities, i believe, is the possibility for exposing truth. heidegger conceives of truth as something primordial, which is uncovered, disclosed, or revealed (blattner, 2006). in groth’s poetry, the initial fragrance was associated with sweet hopefulness that existed before the linguistic interruption. now, the hopefulness of spring exists through the lens of a tear-filled eye, suggesting more than one possibility for truth. for example, the tear could represent a loss of innocence and humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 12 the potential for melancholy that will accompany the revelation of spring; a symbolic reference to beginnings, birth, and re-birth. alternately, the tear may suggest a real and deep unity that has transpired, and in the context of the perinatal experience, a truth that depicts the bliss and splendor of mothering, expressed with tears that originate from an altogether experience of being. the dormant bud is “called forth” with immediacy and timeliness. heidegger wrote: “temporality temporalizes the world time, in whose horizon ‘history’ can ‘appear’ as an occurrence within time” (p. 413). in his discussion of temporality, heidegger identified, once again, that previous philosophic conjecture has not attended to what he considered to be essential: the finitude of dasein, the rhythmical, predictable and repetitive coming into and the passing through, as well as the final passing, which is death. importantly, heidegger equated temporality with being, that is, being is conceived only in context with a temporal structure (blattner, 2006). the imperative of assimilating history as part of the now, as heidegger suggested, has immense relevance for nurses who interact with women during essential perinatal moments, for the nurse and the woman will be forever linked in a shared history of that birth. heidegger’s departure from historically constituted philosophy, and the assertion of being may have the potential to influence those who offer care in the realm of birthing, for heidegger insisted that there is an inevitable return to notions of being. the circuitous revelation that comprises that return can inform nursing practice by keeping us ever mindful about the need to honor in-the-moment interactions, invoking a heightened but familiar sense of being-inthe-world, even while navigating the environment of health care, with all its technological and organizational imperatives. always and repetitively, and in all interactions, there is an opportunity to privilege the wonder of our dasein-our existence-allowing for revelation and meaning to evolve for each woman and each nurse who together traverse the profound experience of birthing. it is in this way that we are able to integrate our being with others, and conjoin the unique histories that are embedded in each of us. conclusion groth suggested that there is potential for the words to soothe and heal whatever interruption has occurred in the melodic stream. in the context of the perinatal experience, however, i am called to ask “which words?” are they the words of best practice policy and efficiency, of evidence-based guidelines, or are they the words of compassion and attention to each woman’s core experience? are they words of breastfeeding success rates, or are they words of comfort and respect for infant feeding decisions that have been tearfully made? how poignant is the loss of innocence, and the inevitable sadness that accompanies any disruption of a woman’s assimilation into mothering. my thoughts reside with the primordial experience that permeates the event of carrying and giving birth to a child, but i am also drawn to consider the experience of women for whom motherhood is mired in complexity and angst. from a heideggerian perspective, i wonder whether our health practices promote strength and attunement within notions of dasein and being for women. if so, the birth experience may draw forth tears of ecstasy and bliss. if not, the profound meanings associated with birth will be interwoven with the tear-stained eyes of regret. humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 13 references beck, c. t., & watson driscoll, j. (eds.). (2006). postpartum mood and anxiety disorders. sudbury, ma: jones & bartlett. bergum, v. (1989). woman to mother. granby, ma: bergin & garvey. blattner, w. (2006). heidegger's being and time. new york, ny: continuum. brahms, j. (n.d.). in s. kagen (ed.), wie melodien zieht es (e. braun, w. lyman trans.). new york, ny: international music company. breastfeeding committee for canada. (2011d). integrated ten steps and who code practice outcome indicators for hospitals and community health services: summary. accessed from http:// breastfeedingcanada.ca/ caputo, j. d. (1987). radical hermeneutics. repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. bloomington & indianapolis, in: indiana university press. dreyfus, h. (1992). being-in-the-world: a commentary on heidegger's being and time, division i. cambridge, ma: the mit press. heidegger, m. (2001). poetry, language, thought (a. hofstadter, trans.) (2nd ed.). new york, ny: harper collins. heidegger, m. (2010) (originally published 1927). being and time. (j. stambaugh trans.). albany , ny: state university of new york press. humphries, j.m. (2011). breastfeeding promotion. american journal of nursing, 111(12), 11-61. humphries, j.m., & mcdonald, c. (2012). unveiling new dimensions: a hermeneutic exploration of perinatal mood disorder and infant feeding. issues in mental health nursing, 33, 377-386. doi:10.3109/016128 40 .2012.656824 jardine, d. (1998). the fecundity of the individual case: considerations of the pedagogic heart of interpretive work. in d. jardine (ed.), to dwell with a boundless heart: essays in curricular theory, hermeneutics and ecological imagination (pp. 3351). new york, ny: peter lang. jardine, d. (2012). "the memories of childhood have no order and no end" pedagogical reflections on the occasion of the release, on october 9th 2009, of sergeant pepper's lonely hearts club band. journal of applied hermeneutics, 1, 1-9. johannes brahms. 5 lieder, for low voice, op. 105. (2008). classical archives. retrievedfrom http://www.classicalarchives. com/work/5904.html#tvf=tracks&tv=about). oenning-hodgson, m. (2007). the good enough mother. in v. bergum & j. vancerzalm (eds.), motherlife: studies of mothering experience (1st ed., pp. 48-67). edmonton, ab, canada: pedagon. nicolson, p. (1998). post-natal depression: psychology, science and the transition to motherhood. new york, ny: routledge. paley, j. (1998). misinterpretive phenomenlogy: heidegger, ontology and nursing research. journal of advanced nursing, 27, 817-824. sadeh-mestechkin, d., walwsch, a., zeadna, a., ilana shoham, v., & hallak, m. (2007). early post partum discharge: is it possible? archives of gynecology and obhumphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 9 14 stetrics, 276, 65-70. doi:10.1007/s00404006-0296-y thompson, j., roberts, c., & ellwood, d. (2011). emotional and physical health outcomes after significant primary post-partum haemorrhage (pph): a multicentre cohort study. australian and new zealand journal of obstetrics and gyneacology, 51(4), 365371. white, t. (2006). postnatal depression and post-traumatic stress after childbirth: prevalence, course and co-occurrence . journal of reproductive and infant psychology, 24(2), 107. doi: 10.1080/02646830600643874 wolf, j. b. (2011). is breast best? united states of america: new york university press. wynn, f. (2002). the early relationship of mother and pre-infant: merleau-ponty and pregnancy. nursing philosophy, 3, 4-14. appendix wie melodien zieht es wie melodien zieht es mir leise durch den sinn, wie fruhlings blumen bluht es,und schwebt wie duft dahin: doch kommt das wort und fasst es und fuhrt es vor das aug‘, wie nebelgrau er blasst es und schwindedt wie ein hauch und dennoch ruht im reime verborgen wohl ein duft den mild aus stillem keime ein feuchtes auge ruft. like a melody it passes like a melody it passes softly through my mind, like the flowers of spring it blooms, and floats on like a fragrance; but the word comes and seizes it, and brings it before my eyes like the gray mist it pales then, and vanishes like a breath. and yet there`s in the rhyme a fragrance deeply hidden that gently from a dormant bud is called forth by tear-stained eyes. corresponding author: david w jardine email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 22, 2017 the author(s) 2017 thoughts on the return of yesterday’s war david w jardine abstract recent american events have tended to energize me and remind me of a wider swath about our circumstances. we find ourselves fighting this issue on methodological, epistemological, and ontological grounds, but it is also a matter of power and market driven distortions, of issues of gender and how marginalization works to blame precisely those it then victimizes, and on and on. in this paper, i take up some of these ideas. keywords hermeneutics, hermeneutic research, qualitative research, interpretive research, neoconservativism, research funding, dominant cultures who wants yesterday’s papers? nobody in the world. mick jagger and keith richards (1966) from yesterday’s papers i one characteristic of a dominant culture is that, because of its dominance, it no longer needs to give an account of itself or be concerned with its warrantability. it becomes the silently takenfor-granted “way things are” that, in relation to which, warrant is decided and determined. research, publication, funding schemes, even the categories of the forms one fills out, are unquestioningly based on the presumptions and requirements of natural scientific research. it is jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 2 2 not simply that funding is difficult to secure for interpretive work. it is that the very means of such securing are already, at the outset, cast against its case. more buried that this, however, and far more pernicious, is another level of dominance: the presumptions and procedures of quantitative research have come to define anything that does not fall in line with those lines of dominance. under the shadow of quantitative research, qualitative research is said to be about subjectivity, about telling your story, about making things up, about being unaccountably mushy and vague and undisciplined, about being irrelevant and selfinvolved, overly poetic, emotional, uninformed, having no proof (moules, venturato, laing, & field, 2017, p. 3), no generalizability, no reliability. it has little hope of publication. not of practical use. not of interest to readers (moules et al., 2017, p. 1). it is not especially fundable because it does not cleave to the dominant, recognized, and condoned fundamentals. interpretive research is, then and of course, treated as an object of weird suspicions, like a sort of cultish faith object, something lurking furtively in some liminal space outside the confines of the surveillances we’ve come to presume. it is out in the fields (latin paganus), trod the way of heathens, uncivilized, witches work with familiar cats. so, quantitative research not only “dominates the scene” (gadamer, 1986, p. 59) but, not coincidentally, has the character of “seiz[ing] upon and dominat[ing] things [with a] will-tocontrol” (gadamer, 1977, p. 227), thus casting its own shadow over that which slips out of its purview. the dominating character of quantitative research thus provides an equally dominant caricature of any alternative to it. sad to say, over many long years, i’ve seen purportedly “interpretive” work that has fallen hook, line, and sinker for this degrading, bullying caricature, and seen good hearted scholars get caught in the exhausting, unbecoming, and humiliating mugs-game of attempting to refine and upgrade the contours of this caricature, only to then get bowled over, over and over again, by stinging questions posed often out of sheer, i dare say deliberate, ignorance. more than once over thirty plus years, i have encountered people in positions of power (for example, external examiners on ph.d. examinations), literally say, “well, i’ve never heard of hermeneutics!” and who then take that statement as a fully adequate account of why no more needs to be said. students and scholars alike are then asked to give, over and over and over again, a detailed descriptions of a long and publically available history of interpretive work stretching back, in places, to aristotle, even to heraclitus, and up through the humanist tradition first wrought at the advent of modern science in 17th century europe, into late-19th century european contestations and detailed quarrels and concerns over the nature and limits of the human sciences, up through phenomenology, hermeneutics, into long and complex streams of refinement and differentiation over the course of the 20th and 21st century. and all this is the family tree, of course, to contemporary questioning of the value of “the humanities” in a world which is dominated by market-driven concerns for profitability, and which scoffs as any turbid and turgid and timewasting suggestions of the cultivation of character, thoughtfulness, and poise. and those demanding this account, over and over again, have no qualms in not remembering any of this the next time questions are raised regarding the legitimacy of interpretive work. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 2 3 such is the character of dominance. only those marginalized need to remember what has happened. those who are part of the dominant culture can always plead innocence without consequence. those marginalized must remember their own bloodlines as well as those of the forces of marginalization. the dominant need remember neither. dominance is somnambulant and forgetful by nature, but it sleepwalks and stalks. how’s that for “poetic?” it surely bodes that we are dealing with far more here than matters of research methods. it is no coincidence that first nations are speaking up in this fray, that ecological beckonings to heed what lies beyond our will to dominate are becoming increasingly urgent, that those excluded want “in” on what it means to be us. i could go on. we can’t pretend any longer that kin are arising here, around what only seems like yesterday’s war. ii those who have become marginalia to the dominant text have always murmured and have been repeatedly turned into a dirty little secret that might go away if we ignore it again. there is a war. it is nothing new. and the quiet urgency of fighting it remains steady and true. make no mistake. this goes well beyond issues of “research methods.” what is at stake in the marginalization of interpretive research is whether scholars have the freedom, and the intellectual and spiritual responsibility, to explore the lives, often “the pain” (sanders, 2016), of teachers, of students, of nurses and patients, and parents, and so on. these varied and varying explorations come via the tough, sometimes vague and nebulous, sometimes contradictory, doorstep stories that are told, voices caught in the confines, for example, of school hallways, stuck, equally, in the confines of the unvoiced and often unvoiceable ways in which schools have been shaped and thus shape teachers and students alike. likewise, parents who, in a moment of profound breathlessness, entrust their only child into the maw of medicalization. or who know in advance that they will outlive them. or who tiptoe their child behind the schoolyard gate and then have an unrecognizable child read back to them by the regnant regimes of schooling that often brook no quarter of response. the job of interpretive research is to go out into the wild “with [a] readiness to be ‘all ears’” (gadamer, 2007a, p. 189) and to gather what we can of the suffering of our living, the language that is used, the images that arise and fall, how and when the joy outbursts, the secrets, the hushed-ness of ordinary life lived. interpretive work is then charged with trying to give those stories a voice, to “[make] the text[s]…speak” (gadamer, 2007b, p. 189) by linking them up to the lifelines of the world, to the images and ideas and ancestries that we have variously inherited, so that their deep resonances can be made conscious. this is our work, as scholars, to search and re-search these mixed and convoluted inheritances for tales anciently told, for ancestors that have spoken and written about the matters at hand, so that the doorstep tale becomes a gateway into a jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 2 4 larger life, a larger living, a larger commiseration, and i can experience the confines of my own telling opening up beyond the stifle of my own joys and sorrows: i don’t want to “tell my story.” i want to be relieved of it by going to a place (ecos -, topos -/topica -) where i can meet others who can read me back to myself from beyond my own failings and limits and delusions, beyond the story i’ve presumed. (jardine, 2016, p. xvi) interpretive work is charged with not cleaning these stories up, blunting their sting, making them palatable, non-contradictory, smooth and easy. it is charged, instead, with “restoring life to its original difficulty” (caputo, 1987, p. 2), a restoration that is necessary because of the oppression and repression of the suffering and hope of, well, all of us, under falsely assuring rubrics and cold steel confidences and marketing gimmicks that want to hear nothing of our living and dying. through such bringing-to-awareness of the messes we are in, there is the possibility of some relief from, or at least some possibility of commiseration over, the only-seemingly-binding character of our living and our lives by studying the fabric of the world in which we are living and of which my own tale is simply a part: this fabric is more abundant, more forgiving and generous and difficult than any one of our lives alone can measure, so, in exploring these things, in studying thus in the presence and grace of each other, i can be relieved of some narrow confine of my “self” by working it out, not simply working on it. this is why [interpretive work] feels spacious even when that fabric binds and pulls at my attention. (jardine, 2016, p. xv) let’s be blunt, then: “the aim of interpretation, it could be said, is not just another interpretation but human freedom” (smith, 1999c, p. 29), hard-won and always in need of re-winning. as goes an old hermeneutic saw, every text, every tale told, can be read as the answer to a question that could have been answered differently and therefore, every reading of every text is possible, not necessary, thus issuing a sort of relief from what appears to be intransigent, dominant confines. the life-world is interpretable. interpretive work, therefore, is precisely of “practical value” (moules et al., 2017, p. 1). it is why hans-georg gadamer named hermeneutics a “practical philosophy” (2007a) with a “practical task” (2007c), because it casts us back into the trouble of living now having seen through and broken the spell of the dominant surface stories that have held us in thrall. when it is well done, it is “of interest” (moules et al., 2017, p. 1) to readers precisely because it is about their lived experience of being-in-the-middle-of-things (latin, inter + esse). i’m here reminded of an image from david g. smith that i’ve often cited, that casts this in light of his and my common work in pedagogy, in schools: “whether . . . life itself has a chance, or whether the surface is all there is” (smith, 1999, p. 139). jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 2 5 iii instead of taking on the terribly difficult work of venturing, deliberately and with all the poise that scholarship helps us muster, into the roil of living, those of us involved in interpretive research seem stuck, again and still, like recent elections have demonstrated, with having to spend our time going to fund-raising dinners that seem bent on ignoring those doorstep voices, those haunts of lives, in favour of kowtowing, as moules et al. show so well, to what wealthy donors want and how they want it served up: “an ordering of things according to the wishes, prejudices, or promptings of the powerful” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 261). we seem stuck, more than ever, with giving an account of what we are doing in such pernicious detail that we have little time to do any of the slow, meticulous work of thinking, of listening, of reading through the life and language we have inherited and the ancestors and elders who whisper, and therefore reading the world more acutely as a consequence. that is not what those invested in the status quo want. they want work that is compliant of this status. they do not want the suffering of life to become legible, especially to those who are suffering and who, in being asked to speak to their lives, just might have the chance to raise their heads out of the tangles when they realize what has been perpetrated, how they have been had by what passes for “the real world,” for being “just the way things are.” when such ideas were posed to an exhausted high-school teacher, he said of his hurry and exhaustion, “this is the real world.” he was, at first, shocked to hear my answer: the world of schooling is not “the real world.” it is just how the world has thus far happened to turn out, and the causes and conditions of such turning can be understood, unraveled, and we can unravel ourselves from this turning and, in small, sometimes quite meager and temporary ways (given the largeness of the looming of things), take a breath. this experience is immediate and intimate, but it takes repeated practice and hard study to release and realize this immediacy, and even then it is not released once and for all and it is easily and understandably frightened off. as the exigencies of every life rise up, so, too, rises up the tendency to retrench, harden and once again conceal. (jardine, 2016, pp. xvi-xvii) once i can get some distance from the doorstep of my own exhaustion, a glimpse is possible (a glimpse, daresay, that is precisely and deliberately prevented by the regimes of exhaustion themselves). the efficiency movement (jardine, 2016, pp. 179-192; kanigel, 2005; taylor, 1903, 1911), which took hold of education early in the 20th century, demands and produces exhaustion and rush in order to keep workers in line. thus, intimacy of this teacher’s expression of his livedexperience, in such an exchange, gets both confirmed and denied. his exhaustion seems even closer at hand, and, at the same time, he is allowed to experience some wider, more hidden truth about the arrival of his circumstances, a truth that was being blocked by the flat declarations about “the real world.” what he is experiencing is now experienced as possible (having arisen from causes and conditions that are not permanent and fixed) but not necessary (not just “the real world”). it is, that is, interpretable. this, of course, can increase one’s sorrow, finding out that the conditions of exhaustion remain dominant even though that dominance is now transparent. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 2 6 as david smith once said to me, interpretive work is not designed to give you a good night’s sleep. and when that high school teacher decried the lack of initiative in his students, i cited the originator of that very same efficiency movement, fredrick winslow taylor (who was hired by the united states department of education to re-think schools and make them more efficient): “we do not ask for the initiative of our men. we do not want any initiative. all we want of them is to obey the orders we give them, do what we say, and do it quickly” (cited in kanigel, 2005, p. 169, emphasis is mine). so, the intimately experienced lack of initiative of students is not just a subjective report by a particular teacher, nor is it simply a property of “kids these days.” in interpretive work, it is treated as a potential herald of multiple threads that have come to bind our living. to caricature it as “his subjective opinion,” or to pin it on the wantonness of today’s youth, are outrageous and profoundly illiterate attempts to marginalize these doorstep tales in precisely those ways that wish to keep them impotent and compliant and obedient and silent, that wish to prevent them from being interpreted as perhaps insightful about our circumstances and what we have forgotten. ask: who profits from the exhaustion of teachers, of scholars? who benefits from the well-trained compliance of students entering the world? who finds it worthwhile that a student learns full well that the only real question is “tell me exactly what you want and i’ll do it”? dominance. so, could this high-school teacher’s statement have been interpreted differently? of course. welcome to the tough work of interpretation that must, as part of its work, always try to make the case for why it makes the case the way it does, thereby sharpening and critiquing its own presumptions in light of the object being investigated and the ever-new circumstances of its appearance. what becomes visible that was once occluded? what is remembered in such an interpretation that has been forgotten? what now seem to be a living issue rather than something over and done with and dead? (see moules, 2015). under the heading of interpretive research there is a whole unruly family of ways to take up these questions of waking up and clarifying the conditions under which we are living. iv is it really “yesterday’s war”? what gadamer has to say about what gets counted thus raises and goes well beyond issues of “research methods.” but it is also about research and its ways and presumptions. as it articulates so well, there are very complex ontological and epistemological issues involve in this reputed war over research paradigms. that it could arise all over again as if we had never been through this before is one more example of that old adage, that when those who fought the war before and won the peace die off or fade from view, the prospects of a new war that remembers nothing of its cost, increase. i want to add to this conversation about these ontological and epistemological issues by thinking more about the object of investigation in interpretive work. qualitative and quantitative research are not warring over different ways, different methods, differing criteria of how to properly approach the same object. the object of each is different and each, i suggest, tries to measure up properly to its own. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 2 7 the object of investigation in qualitative research is not a “thing” with properties to be discovered and named under regimes of “control, prediction and manipulation” (habermas, 1972, p. 21), but is, rather, a long and contested, and emergent lineage of images, ideas, choices, possibilities, occlusions, inclusions, victories, defeats, silences and voices. the suffering of a young child, or the effort to learn to pronounce a new word (jardine, 2016, pp. 290-291), for example, is not a separately determinable object that somehow “is what it is” and is then, post hoc, voiced in various ways, seen from various perspectives, such that we could then somehow compare this variety to this pre-determined object. the object being considered by interpretive work is that very various-ness. “only in the multifariousness of voices does it exist” (gadamer, 1989, p. 284). and that variousness varies over time. this is its emergent, living, contested, nature. this is the “real world” of the life-world, to be thus. this is why gadamer (1989) cites the examples of law and art in order to try to get hold of the character of knowledge in interpretive work. in the law, a new case does not just fall under an old law, but calls that law to account for its governance. cases – those doorstep stories – are thus “fecund” (gadamer, 1989, p. 36). “interpret[ing]” such cases is “the furthering of an event that goes far back” (p. xxiv), summoning precedents or using old images or new nuances, unearthing the work, say, of f.w. taylor, and making the case for this surrounding of the case of a tale told in a high school hallway. the object under investigation in interpretive work is thus part of a living tradition, as is that interpretive work itself. as with, for example, the history of visual art, the arrival of picasso is not just the addition of one more case that falls under already-established rules and expectations governing “art history and technique.” the arrival of his work induced the disturbing, contentious disestablishing of those very rules and expectations, and then, of course, had a hand in the slow reestablishment of that very history, now revived by a new arrival, now no longer the tradition it seemed to have been. new things become precedents that were heretofore simply ignored or lost to memory. different things become “old fashioned” or no longer done. things that were once silent start speaking up. this is “the real world” of a living tradition in the life world, and to expect to have the fixity prerequisite of an object of the natural sciences is to violate what it is. we can read of a teacher who speaks of the experience of having a dying child in their grade two classroom and helping the children learn to live with this reality and to learn to live with it herself (see molnar 2016). we can recoil in witness of the case being made that the developmental readers used in schools (so ordinary, so de rigueur in their dominance of classroom practices in the early grades) have an affinity to issues of colonialism and the loss of the tracks of one’s people (tait, 2007). someone else writes of the loss of her cousin, shelby, to cancer (latremouille, 2014) and the parent of a child of the same fate, writes in response (see jardine 2014a, p. 1), and this beckoned me to suggest that “this is why we read. this is why we write” (jardine, 2014b). the investigation of such things must itself not demand that these things be differently than they are. this is why i hold this difficult passage from hans-georg gadamer (1989) so near and dear: knowledge [in interpretive work] is not a projection in the sense of a plan, the extrapolation of the aims of the will, an ordering of things according to the wishes, prejudices, or promptings of the powerful; rather, it remains something adapted to the object, a mensuratio ad rem. [this, please note, is true of and apparent in the natural jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 2 8 sciences as well as the human sciences. however, the object of the natural sciences is a different object, and therefore the measure of its adaptation is different; see below] yet this thing [in the human sciences] is not a factum brutum [a “brute fact” that “is what it is,” thus laying out the task, in the natural sciences, of finding and pinning down what it is] but itself ultimately has the same mode of being [being human]. [in the human sciences] neither the knower [the one doing interpretive research] nor the known [the object being interpreted] is “present-at-hand.” (gadamer, 1989, p. 261) a tough read, especially for anyone who thinks that, in interpretive work, you just get to say what you think and make things up. here is an elaboration of this passage, including a slightly different and illuminating translation of some of these thoughts. in interpretive work: both the one who understands and the thing that is understood “are” historically, that is, in the process of unfolding themselves over time, and neither the one who understands nor the thing understood “are” statically present [-at-hand] independently of each other. both “are” in their interactive development. hence, understand is still a mensuratio ad rem, as gadmaer puts it, or, in another traditional formulation, an adaequatio intellectus ad rem, except that the “adequation” of the intellect, its measuring and fitting of itself, is never to a timeless thing that always is what it is, some brute fact, “determinable” and independent of the one who knows it [or the lived circumstances in which that knower lives – knowing of picasso, e.g., is no what it used to be]. hence, i suggest that we might better speak of a reciprocal adaequatio intellectus et rei, of the temporary adequation of two entities, intellect [me attempting to hear of this teacher’s experiences with the full weight of what i know of our shared and contested intellectual ancestries] and thing [this story, here, now, pleading both up out of and to that ancestry], to each other, each in their particular historical development at the given time. (smith, 2011, pp. 24-5) part of interpretive work involves reading these passages of gadamer’s and smith’s with all the open-eared audacity that we try to give to our so-called “participants” in a research study, because each of these clusters of texts (“the literature,” the interpreter’s background study of the phenomenon being investigated, and the “data” [interviews, transcripts, anecdotes, written missives from participants, and so on) must learn to speak to one another if the interpretive study is to be successful. each clarifies and expands the other and frees it from its limitations. each relieves the other. the literature relieves the doorstep tale of its “my story”-ness by reading it out into a world of lost relations and occluded ancestries; and the doorstep tale relieves the literature of its moribund erudition and danger of closing the case, by calling it to account, here, now, the door just ajar. interpretive work therefore tends to sometimes be hesitant and indirect, not in an attempt to obfuscate an object that is itself clear, but in order to bring out the obtuse and myriad and unfinished character of the object itself. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 2 9 v after all, who is to say once and for all what might become of grief and how we live with it and talk about it and hide it and suffer it as the world shifts around us? who would have thought that this war would have reared up again and we’d have to parse our way through it all over again? years ago, in an informal conversation with hans-georg gadamer in his office at mcmaster university, he told me that the care-laden work of interpretation is “internal to being-in-theworld -a process of inner clarification – rather than its domineering father” (jardine, 2015, p. 16), and it has taken, it still takes some doing to learn to live with this gentle, encouraging admonition. interpreting our living is what living does all by itself. it is not the property of research. research is one of its cousins, one of its specialized forms. and, as david g. smith quipped years ago, once you kick the old man out of the house who could domineer over these matters of living, now what are you going to do? you can rest assured that there is no unifying methodology or realm of concern or emphasis or unanimity in interpretive work itself. it is quite akin to a family gathering whose kinships and claims to lineage and importance and urgency are always up for debate, the sort debates that only gatherings of relatives can betray. you can rest assured, as well, that some in this gathering will find this paper far too heated, while others will find it timid and cowardly. welcome to the life world, then, and to the unfortunate circumstance that always faces those marginalized, of being asked to fight a war premised on thin air. how about this? welcome, instead, to the doorstep and the troublesome invitation to step out into the wild of things. references caputo, j.d. (1987). radical hermeneutics: repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. bloomington, in: indiana university press. gadamer, h-g. (1986). the idea of the university–yesterday, today, tomorrow. in d. misgeld & g. nicholson (eds. & trans.), hans-georg gadamer on education, poetry, and history: applied hermeneutics (pp. 47–62). albany, ny: suny press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.; j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (2007a). hermeneutics as practical philosophy. in r.e. palmer (ed. & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 227-245). evanston, il: northwestern university press. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 2 10 gadamer, h-g. (2007b). text and interpretation. in r.e. palmer (ed. & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 156-191). evanston, il: northwestern university press. gadamer, h-g. (2007c). hermeneutics as a theoretical and practical task. in r.e. palmer (ed. & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 246-265). evanston, il: northwestern university press. habermas, j. (1972). knowledge and human interests. boston, ma: beacon books. jardine, d.w. (2014a). some introductory words for two little earth-cousins. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 1. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/61 jardine, d.w. (2014b). guest editorial; this is why we read. this is why we write. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 1. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/64/pdf jardine, d.w. (2015). “you’re very clever young man.” in d. jardine, g. mccaffrey, & c. gilham (eds.), on the pedagogy of suffering: hermeneutic and buddhist meditations (pp. 1-18). new york, ny: peter lang. jardine, d.w. (2016). in praise of radiant beings: a retrospective path through education, buddhism and ecology. charlotte, nc: information age publishing. kanigel, r. (2005). the one best way: fredrick winslow taylor and the enigma of efficiency. cambridge, ma: the mit press. latremouille, j. (2014). my treasured relation. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 2. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/62/pdf molnar, c. (2016). hypoplastic left heart syndrome. in j. seidel & d. jardine, the ecological heart of teaching: radical tales of refuge and renewal for classrooms and communities. (pp. 8999). new york, ny: peter lang. moules, n.j. (2015). editorial. aletheia – remembering and enlivening. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 2. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/89/78 moules, n.j., venturato, l., laing, c.m., & field, j.c. (2017). is it really “yesterday’s war”? what gadamer has to say about what gets counted. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 1. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/140 sanders, b. (2016). bernie sanders’ revolt conversation. may 26, 2016. retrieved from http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017377444 http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/61 http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/64/pdf http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/62/pdf http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/89/78 http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/140 http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017377444 jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 2 11 smith, d.g. (1999). children and the gods of war. in d.g. smith, pedagon: interdisciplinary essays in the human sciences, pedagogy and culture. (pp. 137-142). new york, ny: peter lang. smith, p.c. (2011). destruktion-konstruktion: heidegger, gadamer, ricouer. in f. mootz iii & g. taylor (eds.), gadamer and ricouer: critical horizons for contemporary hermeneutics (pp. 15-42). new york, ny: continuum. tait, l. (2016). successful assimilation. in j. seidel & d.w. jardine, the ecological heart of teaching: radical tales of refuge and renewal for classrooms and communities (pp. 17-8). new york, ny: peter lang. taylor, f.w. (1903) shop management [excerpts]. retrieved august 14, 2010 from http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/taylor/shop management/abstract.htm taylor, f.w. (1911). scientific management, comprising shop management, the principles of scientific management and testimony before the special house committee. new york, ny: harper & row. http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/taylor/shop%20management/abstract.htm microsoft word gilham2final.docx corresponding author: christopher m. gilham email: cmgilham@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics september 21, 2012 the author(s) 2012 f r o m t h e “ s c i e n c e o f d i s e a s e ” t o t h e “ u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h o s e w h o s u f f e r ” : t h e c u l t i v a t i o n o f a n i n t e r p r e t i v e u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f “ b e h a v i o u r p r o b l e m s ” i n c h i l d r e n christopher m. gilham abstract in this interpretive essay, i attempt to unconceal the problematic history at play in special education in alberta today, with a focus on “behaviour students” or their norm-referenced disability status. a brief, but central, anecdote is used to help reveal some of the everyday problems that arise in education because of the behavioural disability framing of students. i suggest that these problems are examples of illich’s appropriated notions of iatrogenesis and counterproductivity. as an applied emancipatory action, i call upon gadamer and ricoeur to help me interpretively turn the common, everyday understanding of pathology and self in the context of others as possibilities for understanding “behaviour students” anew. keywords behaviour, coding, dignity, disorder, iatrogenesis, self-esteem, special education the concern with things which are not understood, the attempt to grasp the unpredictable character of the spiritual and mental life of human beings, is the task of the art of understanding which we call hermeneutics. (gadamer,1996, p. 165) hans-georg gadamer (1900-2002) described hermeneutics as an emancipatory and practical philosophy (1976, p. 17). as a strategist for emotional and behavioural disabilities (ebd) in a large urban public school board, i work with school teams to support their work with “behaviour” students. as a faculty of education phd candidate specializing in interpretive work, my understanding of “behaviour” students has profoundly changed. this emancipatory transformation, at the risk of oversimplifying, is largely the result of interpretively understanding the history of the spegilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 2 cial education work in which i have been immersed. special education, however, continues to dominate in educational understandings of difficult students. for most of the people i work with, this discourse is the unquestioned, accepted truth of students with “behaviours.” in this paper, i attempt to interpretively appropriate and explicate some of the history and current framing of this dominant discourse as applied to the lifeworld in which educators and students find themselves. i suggest the problems brought forward in this paper are an example of what ivan illich (1926-2002) interpretively argued as “iatrogenesis” (1975, p. 14) and “counterproductivity” (pp. 212-214). in opening up or revealing these problems, i hope to offer the possibility of further emancipating and transforming our understanding of difficult students in classrooms. a central and illustrative anecdote: sam overflows the frame around him the setting was a highly resourced classroom 8 students and 3 adults for young children with a particular severe physical disability. the administrator called me to help support her team with a student who was having severe behavioural difficulties. here is an important, telling segment from my observation notes: teacher asks sam to come up to the board: “come on sam. come here and give it a try.” sam looks around at peers. pauses. squirms in seat. flaps arms. puts fingers in mouth. sam gets up. slowly moves to front by teacher while looking at peers and adults. teacher encourages. “it’s ok sam. i’ll help you.” teacher asks sam to point to the numbers and count from 1 to 10. note: peers just counted as a group by 10’s to 100 and sam did not. sam takes pointer. teacher helps sam hold pointer. sam looks at teacher. sam looks at peers. sam looks around the room. teacher helps sam point to 1 and teacher says “1” sam says “1.” sam’s pronunciation is very difficult to understand. this pattern moves along to “5” when sam suddenly throws pointer down, stomps floor, cringes face. teacher: “sam, that’s not ok. we don’t throw things here in this classroom. you’re upset. let’s go sit down.” student aide comes over, standing close to sam. student aide reaches with her hand to take sam’s hand. sam pulls away and kicks student aide in the shin. student aide grabs sam by the arm, angry look on face and with sam resisting, pulls sam to his desk. sam is screaming out something which i can’t understand, and resisting. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 3 teacher is now asking other students to follow along with her as she counts by 10’s to 100. sam is screaming at his desk. this pattern continued throughout the morning i was there. i observed sam’s anger over getting in line, snack-time, and getting dressed in his winter clothes for recess. he is a very complex little boy, full of frustration. consistently frustrated and angry children are not typical in this unique program. it is a program for a particular severe physical disability. the teachers and their administrator feel like they are not able to help a child like sam, which is the reason why they have called me in several times this school year. because i have helped many teachers with students like sam, the administrator also asked me to be part of a larger meeting aimed to help persuade the decision makers in the school board to consider changing the resourcing of the program. sam and some of his peers are students with severe emotional and behavioural disabilities (ebd) and might better be educated in a program for students with ebd, the school claimed. at this level, the school team believed they had reached a limit or a boundary which required different resourcing, or sam and others like him needed different programs that could best fit their “primary needs.” this term “primary needs,” common to us in education, reveals a part of what is at play in our thinking in special education. it hints at a logic structuring the possible ways we think about students. this logic enframes or encloses identity. for example, the current frame around the students in that class including sam is determined by the main physical disability coding placed on them as “kinds” (hacking, 2002, p. 110) of human beings. this limits the ways the school team perceives students, enabling the belief that a student like sam, who also presents with severe behaviours, cannot receive a just education in that specific program. put another way, a standardized slotting mechanism dependent on disability status, which is informed by psychiatry’s technical categories of human abnormality, and its influence in focusing our gaze in particular ways on student behaviours within classrooms does not seem to serve justice to sam and others like him. students who are complex, which most often includes severe behaviours, are beyond special education’s “wanting and doing” (gadamer, 1989, p. xxvi). given this, questions of concern lie within understanding this narrow logic. interwoven, historical logics unsettled then, overflowing the codification as it were, this brief anecdote is an example of the “untiring power of experience” (gadamer, 1976, p. 38). it portends a world much greater, more complex around it. within the anecdote, there are strong threads of both older and modern “logics” woven together plurivocaly (weinsheimer, 1991, p. 183). these “threads interweaving and crisscrossing” (wittgenstein, 1968, p. 32) form the greater rope-like manifestation or discourse of special education. there are other thicker strands intertwined with special education as well. framing students with ebd (and other diagnoses and codes) has been a response to these various historical traditions woven together. aristotle’s logic of a=a the current point of essential power in special education in alberta is coding. the severe ebd coding can only occur if a psychiatrist or registered psychologist diagnoses a gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 4 student with a disability found in the american psychological association’s diagnostic and statistical manual (dsm). the dsm clearly states that diagnosis is independent of the rest of the world. as laurence and mccallum (2009) noted, in the dsm-ivtr: …whatever their original cause, disorders must be considered “a manifestation of a behavioural, psychological, or biological dysfunction in the individual” and that neither deviant behaviour (e.g. political, religious, or sexual) nor conflicts that are primarily between the individual and the society are mental disorders unless the deviance or conflict is a symptom of a dysfunction in the individual. (p. x) key here is the structural logic within the definition. this logic removes the lifeworld and isolates the individual: the disability is inscribed on the person as an inherent abnormality found exclusively in the self. in other words, the functioning self is “out of order,” independent of the world. interpretive scholars have argued (jardine, clifford, & friesen, 2008; kearney, 2003, pp. xxi, 66) that the logic of an independent, self-identifying order can be read back at least to ancient greece as part of aristotle’s (384 bc-322 bc) logic in his work metaphysics. aristotle’s logic starts with a “first principle” which states: “it is impossible for the same thing to belong and not belong simultaneously to the same thing in the same respect” (aristotle, metaphysics. book iv 3 1005b19–20 in gottlieb, 2011). this is known as the logic of noncontradiction. such essential knowing could not contradict itself or be different than what we have claimed at the same time and space. for example, sam and his severe physical disability could not also be a severe emotional and behavioural disability. if his primary way of being in the program was through a severe ebd code, he could not continue to be in the program designed for his particular severe physical disability. this is the logic of codification and is evidenced in the ways for which students are programmed: severe physical disability = program for severe physical disability severe ebd ≠ severe physical disability therefore, severe ebd ≠ program for severe physical disability consequently, severe ebd = program for severe ebd in other words, if sam were to stay in the program for the severe physical disability the administrator, teachers, and school board officials would need to break out of this applied logic of non-contradiction. sam’s team and many of my peers in education would readily accept that sam is more complex than the singularity of the codification and the program as described on paper. yet, a consistent practice in education is to claim that sam needs something different than what can currently be provided for because educators are only prepared for the singular, primary codification or, more commonly, teachers in “regular” programming are only capable of working with mainly “regular” students. the inherited logic of a=a seems to profoundly limit educators’ ability to see and practice outside a singular conceptualization of the student with special education status (or not). this is a harsh generalization however, so i will strive to warrant it throughout this essay. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 5 descartes’ isolated knowing rene descartes (1596-1650) inherited aristotle’s logic in his attempt to solidify the ground upon which humans could talk about knowing things with certainty. “cogito ergo sum” was the result of his thought experiment: “i think, therefore i am” (descartes, trans. 1988, p. 80) this “unshakable proof” for existence happened exclusively, according to this logic, in his mind at the exclusion of the lifeworld in which he was immersed (and thus the connection between his logic and the aristotelian first principle). descartes then went back to his experiences of the world with his new certain causal foundation for knowing which allowed him to continue to follow the aristotelian logic of a substance needing only itself to exist. this was a renewed interpretation of the non-contradictory principle through inner identity-making. understanding the world was a matter of breaking the world down into its essential features. in the breaking down towards certainty, the world emerged as differentiated objects for study, separated from a diminishing whole. auguste comte’s science, logical positivism, and behaviourism comte (1798-1857) believed that science no longer concerned itself with first causes. his emphasis on concrete observations and logical analysis of those observations led to what was called positivism (gadamer, 1982, p. 6). according to ivan illich (1926-2002), comte was also the first to take the then expanding use of the term “norm” and apply it to medicine in the “…hope that once the laws relative to the normal state of the organism were known, it would be possible to engage in the study of comparative pathology” (1975, p. 165). another radical step was taken by a group of thinkers who believed that statements about the world were nonsensical if they could not directly point to the observed, experienced world in a logical, propositional fashion. this was known as the correspondence theory of truth. humanity’s goal in the pursuit of truth is to simply describe everything as it is, via one singular universal and direct perception system of reality knowing. implicit in this system is the perceived direct literalness of human language which is to say: our speaking about the truth of things could never be speculative, poetic, metaphorical, “as” something (davey, 2006; weinsheimer, 1991, p. 129). as a result, the aesthetic loses its significant status as a bearer of truth and is relegated to an interpretation of subjectivity that seems powerless socially and communally. gadamer called this denial of interpretation and historical influence in all human sense-making as the prejudice against prejudice of the enlightenment period (gadamer, 2004, pp. 272-273). positivism was also taken up in earnest by ivan pavlov (1849-1936) and especially b.f. skinner (1904-1990) in their work on shaping behaviours through direct changes in the observable environment. any notion of the inner working of the human being such as mental events and meaning-making were considered fictional (phillips & burbules, 2000, p. 9). skinner’s work was embraced by education in its attempt to shape students into particular kinds of human beings so that learning and an instrumental, productive society could ensue (paul, 2004; phelan, 1996). positivist psychological theory of disruptive behaviour in school also embraces what is sometimes referred to as learning gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 6 theory. children’s unacceptable behaviour is learned behaviour and needs to be identified, monitored and redirected. this represents the skinnerian legacy in schools. baseline data are gathered, students are regulated, their behaviour modified until elimination of the unwanted behaviour is achieved. (slee, 1995, p. 96) hermeneutic philosopher, paul ricoeur (1913-2005), argued that behaviourism works as if human beings are technical, physical objects to manipulate. through such methodology, the experimenter an educator perhaps assumes she/he knows all the variables of the lifeworld of the object, a lifeworld only accounted for via the hard science of physics and chemistry for example and can, by changing such observable variables, extort the appropriate and hypothesized responses from the subject, a student for example (ricoeur, 2007, p. 188). i suggest this is a univocal power reflecting the inherited rationalist logic. the ancient-turned-enlightened logic persists today in special education, despite the various research paradigms that emerged within what is generally known as the postmodern age (sailor & paul, 2004, pp. 37-45). as kearney (2003) wrote: “contemporary thinkers have made much of the fact that the western metaphysical heritage, grounded in greco-roman thought, has generally discriminated against the other in favour of the same, variously understood as logos, being, substance, reason or ego” and “(m)ost ideas of identity, in short, have been constructed in relation to some notion of alterity” (p. 66). at play in emotional-behavioural disabilities today simplified and contradicting, sometimes paralyzing, binaries if we think about the dsm and the nature of coding in the context of sam’s anecdote through this historical weave, the same traditional enlightenment logic continues to be at play. knowing students is a matter of non-contradiction or identity. consequently, a fundamental binary logic of identity and difference sit as the magnetic-like forces upon which our understanding of students (and the world) either attracts to or repels. kearney (2003) and smith (2006) argued this logical binary has been inherited within the western discourse of good and evil, of the monsters among us. today, students with ebd are often seen as the monsters among us but on the margins within our schools, in jails and hospitals, too (gilham, 2011; jardine et al., 2008).i this inherited understanding of difference is different from a logic of conviviality, kin (jardine, 2012), and mutuality found in other cultures (smith, 2006, pp. 35-58). today special education in alberta insists on this logic of identity and difference. thus, one is either able or disabled, normal or abnormal. our observations of students in the unique program resulted in a contradiction within the inherited logic of equating objects with isolated essences or codes. sam presented more complexly than a singular corresponding code would allow, as evidenced in the singular programming present in the classroom and the teachers’ consequently enabled fears that they were not trained to teach students with severe behaviours (jeary, couture, & alberta teachers, 2009, p. 15). something comprehensive in our understanding of one another, of students in the greater context of a lifeworld has been lost in the reification of a category like ebd via the logic of non-contradiction and the dsm’s skinnerian-like descriptive gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 7 approach to constituting mental illness (greenberg, 2010, pp. 238-252) similarly, education’s misbehaviour is concealed in this focus on the disabled, isolated subject as object. illich (1975) profoundly captured what might be taking place: in every society the classification of disease-the nosography-mirrors social organization. the sickness that society produces is baptized by the doctor with names that bureaucrats cherish. “learning disability,” “hyperkinesis” (adhd today), or “minimal brain function” explains to parents why their children do not learn, serving as an alibi for school’s intolerance or incompetence. (p. 169) as a result “the sick person is deprived of meaningful words for his anguish…his condition is interpreted according to a set of abstract rules in a language he cannot understand” (pp. 170-171) and what was once a rich vocabulary people were able to use to talk about and express their suffering is lost, concealed, and taken over by the “increasing dependence of socially acceptable speech on the special language of an elite profession” (p. 171). gadamer (1996) described this technical knowing, yet limiting phenomenon, as the rational organization of science into a business-like model which has resulted in a general rule for the modern age: “the more rationally the organizational forms of life are shaped, the less is rational judgement exercised and trained among individuals” (p. 17). the above speaks to the arrival of my current work as a strategist, as well; schools believe they have lost all their means to “control” students with ebd coding and call in the “expert” representing the discourse of special education to show them the strategy, the method, the best practice through which control can be had once again. in the process, the question of codification and slotting into further special education status emerges, almost inevitably as a result of the perceived inability to deal with the difficulties students present to us, as a result of inherited ways of categorizing the world into either “this” or “that.” i can do “this with this,” but not “that with that,” it seems. what the experience with sam demands is …a redressing of the balance so as to arrive at a more ethical appreciation of otherness. such an appreciation reminds us that the human stranger before us always escapes our egological schemas and defies our efforts to treat him/her as a scapegoated ‘alien’ or, at best, an alter ego. openness to the other beyond the same is called justice. (kearney, 2003, p. 67) solution and results-focussed similarly, the inherited foundational logic and its application in scientific thinking insists that the goal of working with students with ebd must be solution or resultsfocussed, as soon as possible. in other words, we perpetually attempt to “re-code” the disability and associated strategies in the hopes that we will figure out and cure inappropriate student behaviours once and for all, such that difficult and ambiguous human behaviour will ultimately be consoled, such that nothing out of the social order of schools and classrooms could ever happen. there seems to be no room for an inconsolable approach to being with one another in special education (britzman, 1998, pp. 49-60). there is a concomitant ideal that progress is only measured in the reduction or elimination of behavioural issues in students, evidence of the impact behaviourism has had on special education. this can be seen through goals as measures of success in ingilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 8 dividual program plans (ipps) which often state the desired percentage decrease in unruly behaviour. moving, accelerating, and fragmenting targets in the detection of sickness medicine does two things: it “discovers” new disorders, and it ascribes these disorders to concrete individuals. (ivan illich, 1975, p. 92) depending on time and place, who and what counts as an ebd student differs, as well (winzer, 2009, pp. 129-153). the overall arching logic driving the belief in an autonomous inherent disability within students also conceals the historically-effected conditions under which students are seen as having this disability, by whatever names such inherent self-rooted behaviours have and will continue to be called over time. characteristically, educators were driven more by a search for specificity. the need to understand deviance led to a parsing of complex actions. as special educators broke diffuse generic concepts into specific categories, the terms for categorical definitions of exactly who was behaviourally disordered constantly expanded, collapsed, and were reenvisioned. descriptors and classification systems generally showed a murkiness that reflected both changing public morality and the subjective offerings of observers. in fact, the terminology used by the educational, legal, and correctional systems became so unclear and overlapping that a 1959 writer chided that “all of these categories, supposedly separate and distinct, represent a paragon of confusion since they may very well describe similar facts. (clayton, 1959, in winzer, 2009, p. 132) as a result of this persistent logic and others, there has been, overall, a manifold, accelerating increase in codes and programs for those codes. neat little boxes for the autonomously independent and isolated disabilities have become the norm within the abnormal. entering the logic of codification results in a perpetual, non-stop attempt to categorize everything humans do that is deemed excessive, inappropriate, or abnormal: for example, the effort is focused on what to call this behaviour, and how to describe its criteria in such a way that professionals can objectively assign this disability to others without having to talk about theories of the self, inner urges, and sufferings. illich argued (1975) that the entire modern medical profession was built upon a foundation of creating objective disease for the purpose of sustaining and enlarging the control and power of the medical bureaucracy. he took a much older and recognized medical phenomenon and applied it to the modern phenomenon i have been describing: “…an expanding proportion of the new burden of disease of the last fifteen years is itself the result of medical intervention in favor of people who are or might become sick. it is doctor-made, or iatrogenic” (p. 14) or, in other words, “all clinical conditions for which remedies, physicians, or hospitals are the pathogens, or “sickening” agents” (p. 27). in our education and special education context we could say that both the school system itself, infused with educational psychology’s power, and built upon an industrial model of schooling, is complicit as a “sickening” agent. illich argued it is not just school, but our modern industrial society as iatrogenic (p. 88) resulting in an entire population as disabled: “at each stage of their lives people are age-specifically disabled” (p. 79). gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 9 “just plain sick” gary greenberg (2010) in manufacturing depression summarized the consequences of having ebd categorized like index cardsii through descriptions of symptoms only: we are just plain sick. which means we can get better. we don’t have to look back at the fire that rained down on us or outward to the inhumanity inflicted in the name of prosperity or forward to the certainty of our own suffering. we don’t have to be stunned at the cruelty-or, for that matter, thrilled by the tragedy-of life on earth or worried that pursuing happiness the way we do is also pursuing destruction. we can be healed. we can get our minds to work the way they are supposed to. and then we can get back to business. (p. 314) as gadamer (1996) noted, this has become possible only in this technical age: “the intrinsic impossibility of simply making oneself an object to oneself emerges completely only with the objectifying methods of modern science” (p. 35). allen frances, once head of the now published dsm, is now adamantly opposed to the very idea of the dsm: “we’re being overdosed and overmedicated…we create a society of people who regard themselves as sick” (wente, 2012). some argue that in our hopes to pre-empt inappropriate behaviour we actually constitute more spaces through which we can marginalize children psychologically (laurence & mccallum, 2009, p. 7). being “just plain sick” assumes that our modern medical institution conceals what illich (1975) termed “the art of suffering” (p. 128), inherent to every traditional culture. suffering, as a performative activity in traditional cultures, allowed humanity to engage with life fully. to be in good health means not only to be successful in coping with reality but also to enjoy the success; it means to be able to feel alive in pleasure and pain; it means to cherish but also to risk survival… each culture gives shape to a unique gestalt of health and to a unique confirmation of attitudes towards pain, disease, impairment, and death, each of which designates a class of that human performance that has traditionally been called the art of suffering. (illich, 1975, p. 128) in the modern objectifying and levelling science of medicine, there is a “war against all suffering” which has “undermined the ability of individuals to face reality, to express their own values, and to accept inevitable and often irremediable pain and impairment, decline and death” (pp. 128-129). once categorized or codified, the object that becomes of the human being must now be repaired, healed, or managed in order to get back onto the assembly line of modernity. psychiatry struggled to survive within this modern objectification of illness and concealment of suffering. greenberg (2010) compellingly argued that the dsm was rewritten as a response to psychiatry’s near death in the 1970s at the hands of groups who would no longer tolerate injustices like the classification of homosexuality as a mental health disease, for example. psychiatry wanted to be like modern medicine and thus the dsm was re-written to allow for the application of diseases to be merely a matter of confirming symptomatic criteria (greenberg, 2010, pp. 238-252). this re-write of the dsm also has an early history attached to the emphasis on positivism seen at the time of comte through the work of emil kraepelin (1856-1926) (young, 1995, pp. 95-96). gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 10 diagnosing by symptoms as evidence of actual inherent illness or disease is the practice used today in school psychology, which is the necessary condition required for coding (alberta, 2009). stated differently, if an expert thinks a student meets the symptomology, validated by the reports of others around the student and forms of mental and behavioural measurement, then the student is diseased just as one might be diseased with cancer or diabetes. the goal in both diagnoses is to heal or manage such disease. along with greenberg and illich, i suggest that life’s difficulties, and the suffering that ensues is concealed by the push for dealing with these diseases and getting on with life, the life of production and consumption. shrinking “this,” expanding “that” i argue we are part of a descending ladder of further, smaller divisions of classifications or kinds or codes, a “typology of disasters” (ricoeur, 2007, p. 196) within which ebd is an even more contentious part. this complex series of logics inherent in the approach to student (and adult) behaviour remains the same and is, at root, a pervasive obstacle holding possibility for seeing and being otherwise chained in a cave of spinning suffering and sickness and fragmentation. the idea that health is a balance (gadamer, 1996, p. 19) of life within community is at stake here; any sign of suffering is often taken as disease, categorized and treated individually. illich (1975) wrote over 35 years ago: diagnosis always intensifies stress, defines incapacity, imposes inactivity, and focuses apprehension on non-recovery, and on one’s dependence upon future medical findings, all of which amounts to a loss of autonomy for self-definition. it also isolates a person in a special role, separates him from the normal and healthy, and requires submission to the authority of specialized personnel. once a society organizes for a preventive disease-hunt, it gives epidemic proportions to diagnosis. the ultimate triumph of therapeutic culture turns the independence of the average healthy person into an intolerable form of deviance. (p. 96) unsurprisingly, the extent of this prejudice extends to the ebd definition. in 1990, the united states’ new definition for ebd was immediately met with debate because, in the pursuit of measurable, objective proofs, “neither logical argument nor empirical studies supported a distinction between social maladjustment and emotional disturbance (see kauffman, 1993a)” (winzer, 2009, p. 133). at risk, as well, is our ability to see difference in others outside of the binary of a shrinking “this” and an ever expanding “that.” the norm retracts in the face of an ever-increasing abnormality. …as networks of governmental intelligibility grow more rigorous, and everincreasing numbers of categories of difference are created and deployed…and as new norms of conduct are fashioned and enforced, we should perhaps be concerned that this occurrence is likely to happen with ever greater frequency. it seems somewhat inevitable that tolerance for difference will decrease as the parameters of the normal are more and more tightly drawn and policed, and the consequence may be that more and more children find themselves placed outside the mainstream door. (tait, 2010, p. 91) american moves and ebd’s positivism the current situation is compounded by the influence of the united states political landscape on the educational system in alberta. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 11 a larger more encompassing trend in western educational research has been driving for evidenced-based best practices that meet a gold standard of quantifiable research methodology (ady, 2006; baglieri, valle, connor, & gallagher, 2010; bennett & wynne, 2006; kauffman, crockett, gerber, & landrum, 2007) despite debate as to what counts under such a standard (ferri, 2011). as a result of this, a sharp shift occurred away from a re-conceptualized era of both post-positivist and interpretive and qualitative educational research (pinar, 1995) to a results-oriented, positivist-based research paradigm. this positivist return came as a result of several damning and damaging publications in the united states which scorned the failures of their educational system. as a result, the us government passed the “no child left behind act” of 2001 which became the focal point for the return to a positivistic educational framing: the passage of the no child left behind act of 2001 is the most obvious of these moves. the law calls explicitly and exclusively for the use of scientifically based research (a phrase used 111 times within it) as the foundation for many education programs and for classroom instruction. gardner (2002) suggested that the text of this law echoes a pervasive theme within current discussions of education in america. this theme is the continuing failure of educational research to improve the dire state of the american public educational system. (barone, 2007, p. 455) since the “science wars” of the 1980s, precipitated by the earlier work of philosophers of science like thomas kuhn (1970) and paul feyerabend (1975), there has been a shift towards an understanding that even science is value-laden (maxwell, 2009; paul, 2002). however, in the field of ebd, empirical, objective knowledge is still reified and highly sought after (paul, 2002, pp. 87-91). for example, in a three-part series in the journal of emotional and behavioural disorders, key figures over the past 30 years from this traditional field were asked what they believed were critical and promising moments for ebd work (zabel, kaff, & teagarden, 2011, p. 133). almost univocally, one of their greatest hopes was in applied behavioural analysis (aba is a direct descendent of skinner’s behaviourism) as a method of shaping and changing behaviour in problematic students. alberta education has embraced the positivistic approach with the support and publication of documents such as boats – behaviour, observation, assessment, teaching (2006) – and supporting positive behaviour in alberta schools (2008), for examples. in both documents the language of aba is prominently used: when inappropriate student behaviours occur, educators should collect data to determine the function of behaviour, those functions defined precisely into five essential categories, and then use aba like methodology to either reinforce positive behaviours or extinguish negative ones. the behavioural support plan, functional assessment report, and individualized program plan are further enactments and artifacts of a behaviourist approach to ebd. all this belies the logics of non-contradiction and reductionism enacted in a positivist behavioural framework. at stake as well then, is the possibility for a future informed by a critical assessment of the prejudices of the past: one of the serious costs of dropping anchor in operant waters is that students of the methods of behaviourism, and researchers given only positivist tools, lose the rich histories of culture and science gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 12 from which intellectual tools and moral compasses for the future are fashioned. (paul, 2002, p. 90) in other words, without being historically conscious of how education has arrived at its current places, educators run the risk of an ongoing sedimentation into what would become the taken for granted accepted practices of the day. as a result, only the special education experts with the expert, hard-core scientific knowledge of aba and aba-like methods can do the work needed for students with ebd. exclusionary practices are sustained via stratified forms of knowers and knowledge. “special education research has become self-referenced over the past three decades…this situation creates researchers who do not value, and are not prepared to negotiate, differences among different perspectives about knowledge” (paul, 2002, p. 85). rights as choice and defense alberta’s education system is a highpressure consumer-culture of educational choice: “forced to act as ‘citizen consumers’ (taylor and woollard, 2003), parents shop for the most promising educational opportunities for their children, and the schools try to attract the top students with enrichment programmes” (graham & jahnukainen, 2011, p. 230). families are swept up into this, hoping for further specialization (another form of fragmentation) for the personalized benefit of their children in the hopes they will be successful. along with this, comes an attitude to preserve or defend the norm for children. it is extremely common in my work for both parents and teachers to claim that students with ebd should not be in regular classrooms because it is unfair to the other children, to have to suffer that child. there are times when the safety of children is at risk so the claims are warranted. there are many times though when this is not the case. entrenched in this culture of choice and defence are localized notions of the norm: the belief that particular schools are meant for particular kinds of learning, therefore particular kinds of students, especially when “students who constitute a threat to the school in terms of reputation (academic or otherwise) are poorly viewed, which creates hierarchies of student value and innumerable incentives to shift undesirable students elsewhere” (ball, gillborn, & youdell, 2000, in graham & jahnukainen, 2011, p. 268). in many charter and private schools, coded students are often screened out. in the public system, i have been witness to school administrators not accepting students with ebd codes into their schools because those students did not live in the school’s designated communities. yet, there were many students attending these same schools from outside the designated community who did not have an ebd code. the a=a logic finds itself abundant in this market-driven consumer culture of choice and defence and also, at the same time, abundantly selective. some argue this neo-liberal, marketdriven social imaginary has dismantled a civil society human connection in preference to competitive individualism (slee, 2011, p. 38; smith, 2006). high stakes testing and accountability measures provide parents with what is considered rightful knowledge to choose the best education for their children. choice and competition as “approaches to social policy pit ‘different conceptions of rights against one another’ as individual competition for public goods works in direct contrast to ‘the idea that a universally accessible public education system ought to exist gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 13 which is available to any [persons] regardless…of economic means’” (davidsonharden & majhanovich, 2004, p. 270 in graham & jahnukainen, 2011, p. 280). at risk now in alberta is a further decline in the idea of a plural school community, in the very idea of “public” education. this individualism is oddly reversed and exacerbated in special education when the categories of ebd garner much attention through public sites. everyone seems to be able to make a claim about who may or may not have a disability (greenberg, 2010, p. 251). i am constantly deflecting teacher and administrator suggestions that their students have adhd or anxiety, for example. families often ask me if they think their child has a mental health disability. as laurence and mccallum (2009) wrote, “they (disability categories) are disseminated through a range of sites, including the mass media, so that although they may have begun as a norm implanted from above, they can be repossessed as a demand that citizens, consumers, survivors make of authorities in the name of their rights, their autonomy, their freedom” (p. xiii). furthermore, illich (1975) argued that the above phenomenon is a sign of a “morbid society” where: ...the belief prevails that defined and diagnosed ill-health is infinitely preferable to any other form of negative label or to no label at all. it is better than criminal or political deviance, better than laziness, better than self-chosen absence from work…social life becomes a giving and receiving of therapy: medical, psychiatric, pedagogic, or geriatric. claiming access to treatment becomes a political duty, and medical certification a powerful device for social control. (p. 123) coding’s in-efficiency movement the industrial production line model in education, a manifestation of the a=a logic, works tirelessly to meet the requirements for its own funding in special education. teams of school psychologists work almost exclusively on social-emotional and cognitive assessments so that school administrators can attach coding status to students which results in increased funding for the school and supports for the students now codified. a part of that funding provided by the codes also pays for the psychologists to do the work needed to acquire the funding. the very system created to support students has resulted in its own army of expert mental measurers who could be directly supporting students in need but instead must spend their time producing psychological assessments to meet the criteria for coding (janzen & carter, 2001). special education funding in alberta would better serve students who are diagnosed with emotional and/or behavioural disabilities if there was a base level of funding provided that was not attached to coding. schools would not have to engage in extensive, timeconsuming coding processes in order to access needed resources. it is highly detrimental to meeting students’ needs to have the funding system leading the pedagogical decision-making, labelling students inappropriately and watering down the real meaning of ‘severe disability’or ‘severe behavioural disturbance’, which has (and still is in many other countries/regions) been relatively rare and associated directly with mental illnesses (cole, visser, and daniels 2001). (wishart & jahnukainen, 2010, pp. 186-187) gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 14 the government’s own contracted research pointed this phenomenon out, as well (graham & jahnukainen, 2011). the norm: misleading logic and exclusion the self-fulfilling logic of a=a manifests in special education as the statistical norm. according to ricoeur (2007), assumed within this tool and its creation of the norm is a conflated, misleading logic: the statistical norm is a universal constant, and this constant is separate from the valuative, ideal aspects of the norm in a given culture for example, happiness or success (pp. 189-190). the norm is ambiguous precisely because the tools of mental measurement like the standard bell curve are at once both contingent and expressions of value. gadamer (1976) wrote: “one look at such fields of investigation as ethnology or history informs us that spaces and times produce highly different life-worlds in which highly different things pass as unquestioningly self-evident” (p. 189). in other words, the norm is relative to culture. “normality is not an observation but a valuation. it contains not only a judgement about what is desirable, but an injunction as to a goal to be achieved. in so doing, the very notion of ‘the normal’ today awards power to scientific truth and expert authority” (rose, 1989, p. 131 in slee, 1985, p. 20). medical science (and special education) then carries within it these fixed assumptions, substituting social norms for statistical averages. “what is now normal is behaviour capable of satisfying the social criteria for life together with others” (ricoeur, 2007, p. 192). in a society that sees the self as a rational, autonomous and freely choosing individual, anything outside of this social norm that requires assistance or control is seen as sickness. hence, to be healed is to be like others, to act like others. medicine then becomes an “obstacle to life” because “life presents itself as an adventure in which we do not know what is a test or trial and what a failure. life is always evaluated and this evaluation is always relative” (ricoeur, 2007, p. 190). in the physical world, there is no place for illness (only natural laws like gravity) but in the biological world, the world of life, there is no absolute definition of disease. this is especially the case with ebds which have changed over time and yet, psychiatry continues to “index card” mental health as sickness. according to ricoeur (2007), if one accepts that disease is not univocally understood, we are left with the idea that a human life that is abnormal or pathological is one that lives in a “shrunken milieu” (kurt goldstein not referenced properly, in ricoeur, 2007. p. 190). this is a claim about being in the world, not sickness. in special education, however, this idea of a shrunken milieu is often negatively read as sickness; therefore, being a student that requires severe and extensive support in his learning environment is to be a disabled student. this is because special education is founded upon a medical science which says so. put differently, the current discourse on pathology conceals the positive aspects of being a student who interacts with his world differently, in a “shrunken lifeworld” which as a form of existing or being in the world, deserves respect as a form of life with its own structure. this is a very important move on ricoeur’s part. in the interpretive tradition, he attempted to renew our understanding of pathology. pathos is “suffering” and logia is “to study” (harper, 2012). our modern understanding of pathology is the science or study of suffering, of diseases. this science has taken on a certain framing which i tried to illustrate above through the interwoven gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 15 historical logics. ricoeur however, brings back “logia” as “logos.” logos has not always been interpreted as an a=a analyticaltype proposition for understanding the world, including human beings. logos also can be read as “being” which is an ontological claim. “being,” in this renewed ontological reading, wishes to respect sam as a human life in the world, a world that both shapes and is shaped by sam and others around him. “being,” in this interpretive sense, entails the understanding that thought does not precede language. given this, language actually gives form to our understanding of the world. language is therefore constitutive and this action is not restrained within the mind of a reasoning being exclusively; nor is it free to be anything it wants. both the world and those who use language interact. being human is to be this being that is capable of bringing being to the world through its full, conscious immersion in the world. hence, ricoeur’s renewal of pathology admits that human beings suffer and we should study this suffering but we should carefully consider how we study because in the “studying” in the sense-making that takes place, like the use of the language of disability and coding there are moral implications for human beings. these moral implications should help guide our constituting language actions. with great caution however, this does not mean that choosing our words carefully is all that needs to happen, either. the words we use the language available to us is deeply impacted by the traditions around us. it is not as if, in simply changing names of ebds, we get around the deeper logic at play in what might normally be called ordinary language use. on the contrary, seeing the world differently requires seeing how it is that we are currently seeing and once this begins, new possibilities for understanding the world emerge, which is, at once, new ways to talk about others, like sam. in short, ricoeur (2007) and gadamer (1996) have led me to this understanding: pathology as “the study of the being of those who suffer” is very different from “the science of disease.” sadly though, in the anecdote, a student like sam cannot be seen as co-existing in a relationship with the world that is smaller or more dependent than the ways of being of other, differing students, or other forms of life, despite all of our dependencies in and on the world. it is no surprise that asking sam to count to ten an impossible task for him at this time would cause him intense frustration. the connection here to our understanding of teaching and learning is paramount. codification within the norm displaces the understanding that humans are different and interact with the world in different ways by identifying this difference as disability or dis-order. whose dis-order, i ask? today, as a result of the current system codification results in exclusion, the “social stigma par excellence” where “inferiority and depreciation are thus socially normed” (ricoeur, 2007, p. 192). counterproductivity and emancipation “the most primordial mode in which the past is present is not remembering, but forgetting” (gadamer, 1976, p. 203) in the entrenched historical logics of knowledge and what has become special education for students with ebd, limits are reached and exceeded between the current dominant ways of knowing students, and how students actually live in classrooms. another way of describing what i have attempted to explicate thus far is through ilgilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 16 lich’s (1975) notion of “counterproductivity”: “it exists whenever the use of an institution paradoxically takes away from society those things the institution was designed to provide” (pp. 212-213). in our industrial society, he wrote that people want “to be taught, moved, treated, or guided rather than to learn, to heal, and to find their own way” (p. 214) and “when perception of personal needs is the result of professional diagnosis, dependence turns into painful disability” (p. 219). the anecdote with sam is a particular site of heated contestation around this phenomenon. i suggest sam’s anecdote is a practical, real summons to those of us in education to question that which has been, and continues to be, accepted, and perhaps taken for granted as the only fixed ways of seeing and being with students. how much of what we do in special education actually takes away from what we want education to do in the first place? a great deal, i have suggested. the revealing of what is going on around us presently as an effect of our lived history is actually a way of taking emancipative action (gadamer, 1976, p. 18). this is an act of historical consciousness-revealing, cultivating our ability to see what is or should be questionable (gadamer, 1976, p. 13). this is also known as a “hermeneutic consciousness” which: …finds its paradigmatic realization in the interpreter’s awareness that the words and concepts he employs are historically conditioned and that they prejudice his interpretation. for this reason, he does not automatically accept their validity or assume their eternal verity; rather he inquires into their origin and history. (weinsheimer, 1991, p. 229) despite experience’s overturning actions, it is easy to fall back into the given of current ways of knowing the world because they are our traditions, our prejudices, our inheritances. i am often obliged to fall back within the given because it is the structure through which my work occurs most of the time. although these traditions structure our ways of knowing, they do not restrict us from knowing differently, however. gadamer (1976) argued that knowing these traditions as pre-judgements in our daily lives allows us to understand what is happening around us, and to be different (p. 9). possibilities emerge once we notice how we have become and are always on the way to becoming more than what we currently are. the challenge is to fuse the horizon of the past with the present, in anticipation of a different way of being tomorrow. one such possibility i discovered during this process of cultivating a historical consciousness is the case of finland (graham & jahnukainen, 2011). between 1994 and 2007, they have had a significant increase in the numbers of students placed in regular classes, a slight increase in students placed in special classes (located in community schools), and an actual decrease in students placed in specialized schools. finland, it has been suggested, does not have the same complex weave found here in alberta. some quick facts highlight the differences: 95% of children begin preschool at age 6. drop-out rate is 0.07%. high school is either through a vocational school or academic upper secondary, both starting at grade 10. 99% of schools are state or publicly run. no high stakes, standardized tests. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 17 culture of deep respect for education and teachers: “pedagogical conservatism.” high degree of trust between educator, political leaders, and parents. curriculum is value driven: equity, participation, flexibility, progressiveness. education is seen as essential to social reform: they have been working on educational reform for decades. fiscal restraint has brought about changes in special education services. use a model of “part time special education” in community schools. as a result, only 6.4% of student population is identified as “special education” which is approximately half the rate in alberta. most of this student population is not in high schools and the retention rate is 89% compared with 70.4% for alberta. special education status is not determined by specialized assessment or diagnosis; it is determined first by teachers and parents who focus on student learning needs. every school of about 300 students has a full time special educator who works on reading, writing and arithmetic, especially in the early years. they are not part of the inclusion movement rather, their system is built on what they call “fully comprehensive schools” which embody the notion of “education for all.” the finland example shows the importance of seeing alberta’s special education context against other cultural contexts. seeing others and their ways of being with students helps inform our understanding of our current ways of being with students and how that could be different, as well. interpretive work acknowledges openly that our lives are “characterized by a great variety of personal, communal, national, historical and religious narratives” (davey, 2006, p.133). this plurality of human existence is why possibilities abound: our stuck ways of framing students are “susceptible to being disrupted” (p. 133). shared esteem or “ourselves as others” in modern society the “i” of our identity seems determined by a “complete selftransparency in the sense of a full presence of ourselves to ourselves” (gadamer & palmer, 2007, p. 239). i am what i see of myself as an independent, rationally acting and therefore free subject. however, the “i” of self is a work of memory and narration within a lifeworld with others (ricoeur, 2007, p. 196). one does not simply make oneself up even within the logic of a=a. even descartes’ logic could not refute that his thinking took place somewhere, at some time, under some conditions. a part of this dialectical action between world and self requires one to make sense of loss, to mourn those things wanted but not gained, had but lost. ricoeur (2007) called this the “double labor of memory and mourning that grafts together the sense of self-esteem” (p. 196). this self-recognition as a narrative capable of creating self-esteem is precisely at risk and “attacked in mental illness” (p. 196). following ricoeur (2007), i want to hinge this notion of self-esteem more clearly onto the role of others in the world around us: “self-esteem does not reduce to a simple relation of oneself to oneself alone. this feeling also includes, within itself, a claim to others. it includes an expectation of approbation coming from these others. in this sense, self-esteem is both a reflexive and a relational phenomenon, where the notion of gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 18 dignity reunites the two faces of such recognition” (p. 196). for students like sam, the relationship between himself and the adults around him at school requires what ricoeur (2007) called a shared or supplementary esteem. again, this requires us to recognize the pathological as more than just negative: it is renewed or strengthened as a smaller, different lifeworld for sam that is something other than “a deficiency, a lack, a negative quality. it is another way of being in the world. it is in this sense that a patient has dignity, is an object of respect” (p. 197). this shared esteem assists “the other to become more resolutely other” and as a result “allows the other to put greater pressure on the adequacy of my self-understanding” (davey, 2006, p. 249). this is to live in the world, with and for others with dignity, i suggest. at this point, i finish with ricoeur’s challenge for those of us in the norm: …to discern in the handicapped individual those resources of conviviality, of sympathy, of living with and suffering that are bound expressly to the fact of being ill or handicapped. yes, it is up to those who are well to welcome this proposition regarding the meaning of illness and to allow it to aid them in bearing their own precariousness, their own vulnerability, their own mortality. (ricoeur, 2007, p. 197) acknowledgments this work is heavily indebted to the mentorship provided by drs. jim field and david jardine. references alberta education. (2009). special education coding criteria 2009/2010: ecs to grade 12 mild/moderate (including gifted and talented) severe. edmonton, ab, canada. retrieved from http://education. alberta.ca/admin/special/resources.aspx alberta teachers' association special education council. (2006). boats : behaviour observation assessment teaching strategies. edmonton, ab, canada: special education council of the alberta teachers' association. alberta education. (2008). supporting positive behaviour in alberta schools. edmonton, ab, canada: alberta education. barone, t. (2007). a return to the gold standard? questioning the future of narrative construction as educational research. qualitative inquiry, 13(4), 454-470. biesta, g., & burbules, n. c. (2003). pragmatism and educational research. lanham, md: rowman & littlefield. britzman, d. p. (1998). lost subjects, contested objects toward a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning. albany, ny: state university of new york press. clayton, m. p. (1959). juvenile offenders and the law. exceptional children, 38, 95105. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: state university of new york press. descartes, r. (1637 : 1988). meditations on first philosophy (j. s. cottingham, r. stoothoff, & d. murdoch, trans.) descartes selected philosophical writings (pp. 80-85). gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 19 cambridge, ma: cambridge university press. ferri, b. a. (2011). undermining inclusion? a critical reading of response to intervention (rti). international journal of inclusive education, 16, 8, 1-18. feyerabend, p. (1975). against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. london; atlantic highlands: nlb ; humanities press. gadamer, h.-g. (1976). philosophical hermeneutics. berkeley, ca: university of california press. gadamer, h.-g. (1982). reason in the age of science. cambridge, mass: mit press. gadamer, h.-g. (1996). the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age. stanford: stanford university press. gadamer, h.-g. (1989). truth and method. london, england: continuum. gadamer, h.-g., & palmer, r. e. (2007). the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings. evanston, ill.: northwestern university press. gilham, c. (2011). beyond the monster’s wanting and doing: special education as a barrier and diacritical hermeneutics as possibility. canadian journal of education, 34(3), 103-118. gottlieb, p. (2011). aristotle on noncontradiction. the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2011 edition).retrievedfrom http://plato.stanford.edu /archives/sum2011/entries/aristotlenoncontradiction graham, l. j., & jahnukainen, m. (2011). wherefore art thou, inclusion? analysing the development of inclusive education in new south wales, alberta and finland. journal of education policy, 26(2), 263-288. greenberg, g. (2010). manufacturing depression: the secret history of a modern disease. new york, ny: simon & schuster. hacking, i. (2002). historical ontology. cambridge, ma.: harvard university press. hatfield, g. (2011). rene descartes. the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2011 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/e ntries/descartes/ illich, i. (1975). limits to medicine. medical nemesis: the expropriation of health. london, england: marion boyars. jardine, d. w. (2012). the descartes lecture. journal of applied hermeneutics. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5pr7n88 jardine, d. w. (2012). pedagogy left in peace: cultivating free spaces in teaching and learning. new york, ny: continuum. jardine, d. w., clifford, p., & friesen, s. (2008). back to the basics of teaching and learning: "thinking the world together." new york, ny: routledge. jardine, d. w., friesen, s., & clifford, p. (2006). curriculum in abundance. new jersey, ny, usa: lawrence erlbaum associates. jeary, j., couture, j.-c., & alberta teachers association. (2009). success for all: the teaching profession's views on the future of special education in alberta. edmonton, ab, canada: alberta teachers' association. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 20 kant, i., & paton, h. j. (1964). groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. new york, ny: harper & row. kearney, r. (2003). strangers, gods, and monsters: interpreting otherness. london, england; new york, ny: routledge. kuhn, t. s. (1970). the structure of scientific revolutions. chicago, il: university of chicago press. laurence, j., & mccallum, d. (2009). inside the child's head: histories of childhood behavioural disorders. rotterdam, the netherlands; boston, ma: sense publishers. phelan, a. m. (1996). “strange pilgrims” disillusionment and nostalgia in teacher education reform. interchange, 27(3), 331-348. doi: 10.1007/bf01807411 phillips, d. c., & burbules, n. c. (2000). postpositivism and educational research. lanham, md.: rowman & littlefield. pinar, w. (1995). understanding curriculum: an introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. new york, ny: peter lang. ricoeur, p. (2007). reflections on the just. chicago, il: university of chicago press. robinson, d. (producer). (2011, june 25, 2012). just what is kant's project? university of oxford podcasts [podcast] retrieved from http://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/people/danrobinson simms, k. (2003). paul ricoeur. london, england; new york, ny: routledge. slee, r. (1995). changing theories and practices of discipline. london, england; washington, d.c.: falmer press. slee, r. (2011). the irregular school: exclusion, schooling, and inclusive education. new york, ny: routledge. smith, d. g. (2006). trying to teach in a season of great untruth: globalization, empire and the crises of pedagogy. boston, ma; rotterdam, the netherlands: sense publishers. tait, g. (2010). philosophy, behaviour disorders, and the school. boston, ma, rotterdam, the netherlands: sense publishers. weinsheimer, j. (1991). gadamer's metaphorical hermeneutics. in h.g. gadamer, & h.j. silverman (eds.), gadamer and hermeneutics (pp. 181-201). new york, ny: london. wente, m. (2012). is anybody normal anymore? retrieved may 5, 2012, from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opin ions/margaret-wente/is-anybody-normalany-more/article2423352/ winzer, m. a. (2009). from integration to inclusion: a history of special education in the 20th century. washington, dc: gallaudet university press. wittgenstein, l. (1968). philosophical investigations. new york, ny: macmillan. young, a. (1995). the harmony of illusions: inventing post-traumatic stress disorder. princeton, n.j.: princeton university press. zabel, r. h., kaff, m. s., & teagarden, j. m. (2011). an oral history of first-generation leaders in education of children with emotional/behavioral disorders, part 2: important events, developments, and people. journal of emotional and behavioral disorders, 19(3), 131-142. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 21 i"" " valle and connor note the school to prison pipeline for students with ebd. they are more represented in prison populations than any other current disability. ii emil kraepelin (1856 – 1926), contemporary with comte and positivism, set about to describe the mental illnesses he saw, thereby establishing an index or nosography of identifiable mental illnesses. greenberg (p. 70 – 71) describes how kraepelin actually did this on index cards and placed them in a ‘diagnosis box’. corresponding author: nancy j moules, rn phd university of calgary email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics november 1, 2017 the author(s) 2017 editorial: grief and hermeneutics: archives of lives and the conflicted character of grief nancy j. moules in memory of john william moules (july 13, 1925 june 1, 2017) kate beamer’s (2017) article, and coyote howled: listening to the call of interpretive inquiry, in its raw grief, and thoughtful insight, brings to mind the hermeneutic capacity to understand grief as “not quite this and not quite that.” as much as i have studied grief from a hermeneutic research approach (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015), and i have counselled bereaved parents, and stood present with many parents at the death of their children, i have not personally felt grief in the way i do now, as five months later, i continue to interpret and re-interpret the death of my father, john moules. in my many writings of grief (see for e.g., moules,1998; moules, simonson, prins, angus, & bell, 2004), i focus on debunking stage model theories, and notions of acceptance and resolution moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 editorial 1 2 and, rather, offer an idea of grief as a biological, emotional, spiritual, and cognitive experience that “becomes an enduring, sometimes relenting, sometimes poignant, but always present part of the life of a person who has lost” (moules et al., 2004, p. 100). my studies and writings are primarily (though not exclusively) focused on understanding grief from the lens of parental loss. i am coming to know grief differently now. grief is not just about saying goodbye and hello (white, 1989; moules et al., 2004); it is not just about making and maintaining a connection to the dead person (klass, silverman, & nickman, 1996; moules et al., 2004), but it also involves something more complicated, especially in the death of a spouse, a parent, or perhaps a close friend – any loss other than the loss of a child. it involves moving back and forth between memory, love, anger, disappointment, reality, romance, gratitude, admiration, regret, and history. it is working through the conflicting things, memories, and emotions that sideswipe you when you least expect them. the death of a child is different from other deaths as i believe it involves the unconditional love that is often held for a child. i am not, by any means, claiming that parent/child relationships are not complex nor that the death of a child is uncomplicated, or even that it is the hardest death to deal with, but i have come to believe there is something that is different in the deaths of other loved ones in our lives who hold different roles than that of a child. in this editorial, i will address this from the perspective of a daughter who has recently lost a father. during the early weeks after my father’s death, a wise friend recommended a book to me written by plum johnson (2014), they left us everything: a memoir. in the book, the author writes of her experience of the deaths of her parents and the work of sorting through the archives of their lives in clearing out the 23-room house where they had lived for decades. i, too, experienced this act of sorting through the archives. along with my son, who has a much more discerning eye than me for what is important to keep, we saw both of my parents’ lives remembered, recalled, and enlivened – the work of aletheia (moules, 2015). an old steamer trunk, marked frosh, 1948, which marked the year my father graduated with a ba from mount allison university, sackville, new brunswick. he would have moved with this trunk from his home in sydney, nova scotia, in 1944. in the trunk was an old boy scout uniform, small; we cannot trace the date of when he wore it. there moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 editorial 1 3 are old pennants from his university and different places in canada, some of which we see hanging here on the walls of his dormitory room at mt. a., the photo taken in #239, 2 nd floor west, trueman house, 1947 (as indicated on the back of the photo). seeing them in full, if faded, colour in the trunk stood in stark contrast to seeing them in the black and white of the photo – the still, colourless memory of a colourful past, preserved in an old steam trunk, still imbedded with the pins that held them up on the walls of dormitory in 1947. in the lower level of the trunk, are more artifacts of their lives, and my brother and my lives all old toys my brother and i had as young children: two sets of a barrel of monkeys, old puppets, old memories. on top of the trunk sits our sick bed table, which would be brought to our beds with our meals when we were sick, and could be tilted up after the meal on which to play, draw, colour, or write. moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 editorial 1 4 inside another old steamer trunk, i find my last cast and leg brace when extensive treatment for my club feet was completed. faded signings on the cast are reminiscent of my past: geordie and richard mohl, dear family friends, both now deceased; “your brother, donald;” “love daddy.” there are many other archives too: all my dad’s past sermons for his church services, letters from his little sister hannah (now deceased), photographs of family, photographs of people we cannot identify: many weddings, baptisms, unknown faces where my father’s service as a clergyman put him present at important and memorable moments in strangers’ (to us) lives. there are things we cannot quite figure out or understand, and things that are somewhat disturbing. as johnson wrote, working through the archives of someone else’s life, especially one where you are a character in that life, is a complicated process and it is evocative and unsettling. it raises more questions than one even knows one has. she wrote: how could i still have questions? friends warned me of this. they said, “when your mother dies, you’ll wish you asked her some questions.” i had more than sixty years to ask questions, but the questions didn’t form until after she’d gone. now there are questions i didn’t even know i had. (johnson, 2014, p. 46) such is the nature of hermeneutics as well. understanding hermeneutically, researching hermeneutically, is complicated, evocative, and unsettling, often uncovering more questions than answering them. it is never a “neutral enterprise” (moules et al., 2015, p. 58). beamer links the idea of the hermeneutic address to that of humility, claiming that the same humility involved in conducting hermeneutic research lies also in the surrender to grief. grief is complex and complicated, never quite this or that; it is ambiguous and, like hermeneutics, it takes on that ambiguity with humility. beamer cites caputo’s foreword in the moules et al. book: “hermeneutics does not shy away from the difficulty of life but summons the courage to deal with life in all of its ambiguity. hermeneutics takes the risk of embracing the coming of what we cannot see coming” (caputo, in moules et al., 2015, p. xiii). moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 editorial 1 5 as much as i thought i knew grief, i surrender to the humility of it; i did not see what was coming. my son taught me to embrace, rather than discard, the treasures, artifacts, and archives of my father’s life. it takes courage to look at them, and courage to face the ambiguity of grief, the complicated nature of remembering and enlivening someone. relationships are never quite this or that either, and hermeneutics reminds us that the capacity to remain in this in-between is exactly what allows us to be open to what might come. patience. references beamer, k. (2017). and coyote howled: listening to the call of interpretive inquiry. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 10. johnson, p. (2014). they left us everything: a memoir. toronto, on, canada: penguin canada. klass, d., silverman, p.r., & nickman, s.l. (eds.). (1996). continuing bonds: new understandings of grief. philadelphia, pa: taylor & francis. moules, n.j. (1998). legitimizing grief: challenging beliefs that constrain. journal of family nursing, 4(2), 142-166. moules, n.j. (2015). editorial: aletheia remembering and enlivening. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 2. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/89/78 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. moules, n.j., simonson, k., prins, m., angus, p., & bell, j.m. (2004). making room for grief: walking backwards and living forward. nursing inquiry, 11(2), 99-107. white, m. (1989). saying hullo again: the incorporation of the lost relationship in the resolution of grief. in selected papers (pp. 5-28; m. white, ed.). adelaide, australia: dulwich centre. corresponding author: nathaniel g. samuel st. thomas university email: nsamuel@stu.edu journal of applied hermeneutics online date the author(s) 2015 re-storied by beauty: on self-understanding in the ricoeur-carr discussions on narrative nathaniel g. samuel abstract this essay examines the issue of self-understanding, following paul ricoeur who characterizes it as one of the three dimensions of a literary work. the essay places the issue in the context of ricoeur’s discussions with david carr on self-understanding or selfhood identity, demonstrating where the two theorists differ, but ultimately proposing how they complement each other to enrich the issue. i argue that the two converge at a significant point that selfhood-identity is mediated by a host of cultural artifacts, all experienced as narrative. i support this thesis by exploring the way in which the transcultural symbol of sharing a meal can mediate selfunderstanding, and occasion the narrative re-storying of a life. attending to the character of general loewenhielm in isak dinesen’s (1993) babette’s feast, i describe the feast as an event of beauty, arguing how this worked to restore a sense of unity to the general’s life. keywords self-understanding, identity, narrative, paul ricoeur, david carr, beauty, babette’s feast i wish to examine the issue of self-understanding in this essay, following paul ricoeur who characterizes it as one of the three dimensions of a literary work, besides referentiality and communicability (ricoeur, 1991a, p. 27). in particular, i place this issue in the context of discussamuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 2 sions between ricoeur and david carr. 1 admittedly, these discussions have previously (and accurately) been framed in terms of the question of referentiality (kearney, 2006). my aim here is to take up what i perceive to be another dimension of the exchange that of self-understanding or selfhood-identity – demonstrating where the two theorists differ, but ultimately proposing how they complement each other to enrich the issue. my point of departure will be ricoeur’s work on selfhood-identity, particularly his proposed role for literary fiction as mediating between “man [sic] and himself” (ricoeur, 1991a, p. 27). next, i bring david carr’s work particularly carr (1986) into conversation with ricoeur on the aforementioned themes. i argue that carr’s thesis on the self and narrative is not as far from ricoeur’s position as may be imagined. both theorists appear to subscribe to the narrative quality of human life as a first order, even before that life is represented in literary or historical fiction. this will serve as my first thesis in the essay. the second, and more significant, thesis concerns the way in which carr’s ideas can supplement ricoeur’s triple-mimetic model. i contend that the two authors converge at a significant point: selfhood-identity may be mediated by a host of cultural artifacts, themselves experienced as narrative. ricoeur invites this conclusion while maintaining the primacy of literary fiction by stating that fiction is the privileged mediation of self-understanding “among other [cultural] signs and symbols” that can also function in this role. by arguing that narrative is constitutive of all experiencing, carr’s work warrants the conclusion that these cultural symbols are efficacious in the formation of selfhood and society because they are narratively engaged. to elucidate this thesis, i turn – in the third section of the essay – to the description of the fabled banquet in isak dinesen’s (1993) babette’s feast, which i interpret as offering an example of a cultural artifact that mediates the coming to self-knowledge of the character general loewenhielm. my analysis will not be at the level of the text itself (textual criticism). rather, i examine the imaginary world unfolded by the text, focusing on the dialectic between general loewenhielm’s life and the events surrounding the feast. in the process, i describe babette’s lavish feast as an event of beauty, arguing how this worked to restore (refigure) a sense of unity to the general’s life, accompanied by an unexpected recognition of the permeability of daily life to a prodigal and transcendent grace. as such, babette’s sumptuous feast exemplifies how cultural artifact may serve a transformative and mediatory role in the process of selfunderstanding. ricoeur on self-understanding the problem of self-understanding, as conceptualized by paul ricoeur, stems from the difficulty (even impossibility) of answering the introspective who questions in life – notably: “who am i?” or “who is that person?” from experience, it may be apparent that answers to such questions are 1 the formal exchanges between paul ricouer and david carr have often been considered as a “debate” in the literature. for example, see (kearney, 2006, p. 477). i opt for the term “discussions” on the belief that, to characterize the discourse as a debate, places too much emphasis on the differences between the positions, rather than on the rich insights to be found in the convergences and divergences between ricouer and carr. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 3 not simply reducible to what one does (by way of an activity or profession), or even to a person’s character, idiosyncrasies, and dispositions. to be sure, declaring an occupation (“i am a teacher”) or confessing a certain affinity (“i love being a parent”) may indeed reveal something of a person’s identity, but these assertions do not exhaust the mystery or indeterminacy of the consciousness that poses the question “who am i?” in the first place. identity is aporetic precisely because of its immanence and transcendence to the realm of action, disposition, and character. the question, therefore, of ascription locating the particular entity behind an action, disposition or character – remains intractable. in addition, ricoeur believes that the same can be concluded for the question of imputation – the assigning of moral significance to an action – that entails “accusation, excuse or acquittal, blame or praise” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 191). imputation implies being responsible to the other who needs me, and who asks, “where are you?” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 165) the ethical response notwithstanding, there remains considerable mystery about this self who is called by the other. in light of this, the “who” question at the level of imputation becomes, “who am i … that … you should count on me?” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 168). the problem of identity is essentially a search for coherence or permanence-in-time. ricoeur’s conceptual framework casts the issue in terms of a dialectic of identity-as-selfhood (ipse) and identity-as-sameness (idem) (ricoeur, 1991b). selfhood-identity is what is at issue in human being, and ricoeur observes that it may be established anywhere along a proposed spectrum. at one end, selfhood coincides with sameness. the question of “who” is answered by an assertion of a “what” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 198). at this limit, identity is described as absolute and immutable to evolving, exemplified by popular fairy-tale characters like the “big, bad wolf” or the “evil stepsister” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 148). ricoeur argues that everyday selfhood-identity is inadequately conceived at this end of the spectrum. approaching the other end of the spectrum, characterized for ricoeur by such virtues as selfconstancy, selfhood is entirely distinct from sameness. the merit of conceiving selfhood in this way is that the self is not simply reduced to matters of character. in fact, instability in a person’s perceived character would in no way be seen as negating selfhood. as stated before, one is always more than what one is or does. at the limit of this end of the spectrum, an identity constituted by sheer character-effacing change is indeed imaginable, if only realizable in the world of fiction. given this spectrum of possibilities, the issue of identity for ricoeur becomes “what sort of permanence [in time] is appropriate to a self?” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 192). how is a sense of self retained in relation to these polar alternatives of “absolute identity” and “sheer change”? ricoeur’s answer: narrative configuration and refiguration. the narrative self exists between these poles, providing a sense of coherence and unity even through the volatility and discordances of life, without reducing personhood to fixity of character. hence, even in the midst of a crisis of self, one can still make the assertion “here i am!” and “here i stand!” before the “other” who calls me to account. ricoeur’s central thesis concerns the role that literary and historical fiction plays in mediating narrative identity. essentially, the existential aporia of selfhood-identity is “elevated to a new level of lucidity and also of perplexity” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 195) that ultimately serve to illumine the very real process of self-understanding. here, the selfhood-sameness dialectic is subjected to samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 4 a myriad of “imaginative variations” from the structured plot and sedimented characters of the classic fairy tale, to the pastiche and disjointed plot of the stream of consciousness novel. the limit case of contemporary literary fiction is particularly important to ricoeur, because such novels serve to bring selfhood-identity into focus by “taking away the support of sameness” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 149). in this narrative genre, the relation between character and plot is inverted – the plot serves the character, and introduces such volatility that “the character in the story ceases to have a definite character.” 2 there is a seeming loss of identity evinced by the admission “i am nothing.” yet, the very fact that there is still a “who” that can assert, “i am nothing,” preserves the validity of the question of ascription. “who am i, who am nothing?” if anything, the limit cases of fiction demonstrate the persistence of the “who” question in fiction and in life. these limit cases also highlight the durability of imputation. the moral obligation to the other does not dissolve with loss of character or identity. the character development of the contemporary novel may rest on multivocality, but the characters themselves are not beyond the ethical import of their actions and decisions. in this case, ricoeur rephrases the question of imputation as: “who am i, so inconstant, that notwithstanding you count on me.” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 168) the limit cases from fiction serve to illustrate that, in both cases ascription and imputation the question of selfhood-identity persists, even when unmoored from sameness identity. the reader may recognize ricoeur’s triple-mimetic structure unfolding here. mimesis i (prefiguration) refers to the existential condition of the subject in quest of an identity, buffeted by the myriad of signs, cultural symbols, and life stories that constitute a social milieu. it forms the matrix within which the self must be identified within the dialectic of sameness and selfhood. mimesis ii (configuration) refers to the mediation of literary narrative, with its profusion of imaginative variations that present a virtual “laboratory of selfhood” to the reader. at the stage of refiguration (mimesis iii), the dialectic of selfhood-identity played out in multiplicity by diverse literary plot is appropriated in real life through reading. 3 in this way, the self “turns out to be a figured self” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 199) transposed from the world of the text into reality, the question of selfhood becomes the horizon that keeps the hermeneutic engagement of text and the search for narrative coherence going. narrative thus plays a critical though not unique role in the discovery of the self. ricoeur (1991b, p. 198) reminds, “the self does not know itself immediately, but only indirectly by the detour of the cultural signs of all sorts which are articulated on the symbolic mediations which always already articulate action and, among them, the narratives of everyday life.” selfknowledge is in fact self-interpretation for ricoeur, and “self interpretation, in its turn, finds in narrative, among other signs and symbols, a privileged mediation” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 188, emphasis added) 2 ricoeur provides the example of robert musil in the man without qualities to this end. see (ricoeur, 1994, pp. 148-149). 3 ricoeur’s theory of reading is made plain in this respect; reading affords an “exegesis of ourselves” – we read ‘ourselves’ when we read a work of literary or historical fiction. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 5 of note in the last quote is ricoeur’s assertion that literary narratives constitute only one of the possible classes of cultural signs and symbols that mediate identity albeit a privileged one. ricoeur (1991b, p. 188) points to the “narratives of everyday life” as another mediating symbolic system. this includes, i suggest, the virtual stories that “play out in our head” and gives structure to daily action and human existence. it is precisely at this point that i find congruence with david carr’s thesis on the narrative quality of experience. the narratives of daily life, which give a sense of coherence and unity to life, are crucial in his discussion of referentiality, and his theory of self. carr on self-understanding carr’s work on narrative is a significant response to the assertion that “real events do not have the character of those we find in stories” (carr, taylor, & ricoeur, 1991, p. 160), a position he attributes to such theorists as frank kermode, seymour chatman, roland barthes, hayden white, and louis mink. accordingly, the narrative form of fiction, biography, and history is a feature of narrative composition and does not subsist in the reality that these discourses attempt to capture. in short, narrative form is imposed on reality. carr names this position the standard view. he counters, “narration, far from being a distortion of, denial of or escape from ‘reality’, is in fact an extension and enrichment, a confirmation, not a falsification, of its primary features” (carr, et al., 1991, p. 162). he draws on husserl’s theory of time consciousness to support his thesis, arguing that the criteria for having an experience at all is that the object of experience is foregrounded by what preceded it (retention), and by what is expected to follow (protention). this means that human reality can hardly be considered a sequence of discrete events. rather, we experience the events of life as “charged with the significance they derive from our protentions and retentions” (carr et al., 1991, p. 163). this protentional-retentional perception gives a unified, coherent and, hence, meaningful structure to individual experiences and events. on the more complex level of the experiencing of a whole life, the same kind of temporal reflective gaze operates, albeit on a far more comprehensive level. carr compares this temporal gaze to dilthey’s conception of besinnung, which entails a form of taking stock of what has gone before, anticipating what will come in the future, so as to shape present action. as such, the standard position of reality – as a discrete flow of events – misleads even at the level of a whole life. human reality is not simply meaningless temporal sequence. the one difference between literary narrative and life, carr points out, is that the former has a distinct author! life “fails to live up to the formal coherence and the clear-cut authorship of some stories” (carr et al., 1991, p. 166). he grants the standard theorists this point concerning the divergence of life and narrative. while there is continuity in the narrative form, the authorship of literary composition is far more refined, with the ability to choose which events are included in the plot so as to provide a logical and satisfactory progression to the story’s denouement. in life, however, the same level of choice is not there, “everything is left in…because there is no narrasamuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 6 tor in command, no narrative voice which does the selecting” (carr et al., 1991, p. 165). 4 he agrees with ricoeur on this point: we are not the authors of our life story. 5 we can narrate, but ultimately we do not choose the material or events that compose our life. neither can we see the conclusion. yet, this is not to say that no selection takes place in life. “our very capacity for attention, and for following through more or less long-term and complex endeavours [sic], is our capacity for selection. extraneous details are not left out, but they are pushed into the background, saved for later, ranked in importance” (carr, et al., 1991, p. 165). however, we make these selections from the perspective of a narrator, rather than that of an author. carr writes: unlike the author of fiction we do not create the materials we are to form; we are stuck with what we have in the way of characters, capacities and circumstances…. we are constantly having to revise the plot, scrambling to intercept the slings and arrows of fortune and the stupidity or stubbornness of our uncooperative fellows, who will insist on coming up with their own stories instead of docilely accommodating themselves to ours. and the fact that we are ourselves sometimes among that recalcitrant audience, that each of us has his own self to convince and cajole into line, puts paid to any pretensions we might have to anything like being author of our own lives: not only do we not control the circumstances, so that they conform to our plans; we do not control our plans, or even the self who plans, whose identity is threatened in the internal dialogue whereby we become our worst enemies. (carr et al., 1991, p. 166) life is an ongoing narrative and we are its narrators, sifting through its vicissitudes in search of a coherent and progressive story of our existence. therefore, the question of identity (or self-understanding) comes down to that of the coherence of one’s life story (carr, 1986, p. 74). from the perspective of an ever-changing now, we as narrators take stock of the experiences, events, actions, roles, practices, relationships that make up our lives (planned or contingent, short and long-term), through a temporal reflective gaze (besinnung) that seeks coherence and a sense of wholeness and meaning. carr describes this process of cultivating, maintaining, and restoring narrative coherence over a life as a struggle. as indicated before, personal stories frequently intersect, plans go askew, and daily life is subject to contingency, not the least of which is the ever-present threat of death. life is messy! as such narrative identity, understood in terms of the unity of the self, is something to be achieved (carr, 1986, p. 97). human beings do so to varying degrees of success, but the challenge endures literally until our dying day. with this thesis, carr departs from kant’s and hume’s idea that the self is ultimately “pre-given” – that it is the very condition for the possibility of experience (kant), or that it is not to be found in experience (hume). rather he insists that unity of self makes no sense unless it implicates the way in which that self is experienced. our experience of selfhood is ultimately tied to our experience of narrative coherence. 4 carr treats author and narrator as equivalent here. 5 ricoeur describes life in terms of co-authorship: “by narrating a life of which i am not the author as to existence, i make myself its coauthor as to its meaning” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 162). samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 7 comparing ricoeur and carr on identity and selfhood at this point, some interesting convergences emerge with ricoeur’s thesis on narrative identity and selfhood. first, carr’s observation of the messiness of life and the consequent challenge to narrative coherence and identity parallels ricoeur’s thesis on the interplay of concord and discord in life (ricoeur, 1991a, p. 31). for the latter, it is particularly the discordant in life – the contingent – that spurs us to restore a sense of coherence. the type of existential emplotment by which one’s identity is constituted, seeks to achieve a synthesis of very heterogeneous events and experiences that constitute daily life. second, ricoeur describes narrative identity as something discovered through a process of interpretation (ricoeur, 1991a, p. 32). the subtle difference with carr’s idea that narrative identity is something to be achieved is quite interesting. on the one hand, it may simply be a matter of semantics. there is considerable convergence in both authors position that identity is something that one works out. whether discovered or achieved, narrative identity is the result of an active process of meaning-making within the flow of events and experiences of life. on the other hand, there is a sense in ricoeur that narrative identity is not something that is entirely in our grasp. there remains a certain mystery to our being, which escapes even the meaning-making ability of our temporal reflective grasp. this point is made clear through ricoeur’s example of the limit cases of fiction, and by extension, the limit cases of life. recall that, at these limits, identity was divorced from anchorage to character and sameness. this is the dark night of identity when narrative coherence is muddled and the question “who am i?” resounds in the emptiness of appropriate answers. what this example of the dark night seems to suggest is that, even if a perfectly coherent life can be imagined, the question “who am i?” would still retain a measure of unanswerability. the question of ascription and imputation is not closed off by the power of our temporal reflective gaze. third, both ricoeur and carr seem to agree that selfhood entails taking up the responsibility for not only living one’s life story authentically, but for choosing that story wisely. as ricoeur points out, we are beings “entangled in stories” (ricoeur, 1991a, p. 30), and some measure of intentionality is involved in finding our own truth, or our unique guiding narrative. somehow “the wandering that may well result from the self’s confrontation with a multitude of models for action and life” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 167) must be halted. ricoeur (1994) further writes: between the imagination that says, “i can try anything” and the voice that says, “everything is possible but not everything is beneficial…” a muted discord is sounded. it is this discord that the act of promising transforms into a fragile concordance: “i can try anything,” to be sure, but “here is where i stand!” (pp. 167-168) at stake in the choice of life story is one’s responsibility to the “other” in life – family, neighbor, the stranger, the impoverished, and the earth. that is the pervading horizon for the search for selfhood – what kind of person for others do i understand myself to be, and do i want to be! however, carr and ricoeur diverge (among other places) on one essential point – the way in which narrative identity is established. ricoeur understands narrative identity as something samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 8 mediated. short of being paralyzed in the face of the myriad of stories that compete for one’s attention, human beings need the break from this existential realm to the imaginative thoughtexperiment realm of literature. the return to life (mimesis iii) will hopefully be from a more informed and wise perspective. in contrast, david carr does not explicitly establish the mediation of literature as necessary in the process of selfhood. rather, he emphasizes that one’s main task is “telling and retelling, to ourselves and to others, the story of what we are about and what we are (carr, 1986, p. 97). carr seems therefore to privilege the role of everyday life narratives in contrast to ricoeur’s literary narratives. carr’s thesis may, in the final analysis, suffer from this lack of a theory of literary narrative, particularly if it is to serve as a comprehensive narrative theory. this may be beyond what the author set out to achieve in his time, narrative and history; the work seems to be bracketed by the task of responding to the standard theoretic position (the “standard view”) that he outlines. carr makes little room for a determined questioning of how literary narratives relate to everyday life narratives, à la ricoeur’s triple-mimesis. that, in my opinion, is the most significant critique of carr’s ideas, if they are to serve as a theory of narrative. they may more adequately be conceived as a theory of life narrative, explicating how coherence/identity/a sense of selfhood is achieved on a day-to-day basis at the level of ordinary introspection. indeed, conceived as a theory of life narrative, carr’s work is of supreme importance. the average human being spends much more time in his/her head than in reading books. the kind of temporal reflective gaze by which carr asserts we pull together a life story, might better capture how the average persons finds meaning on an ongoing basis. 6 this discussion flows naturally into the following revelation: the inescapability from the cultural signs and symbols that mediate human life and understanding. this is where the divergence between ricoeur and carr’s position may be better perceived as characterized by nuance rather than discord. ricoeur argues for the privileged mediation of literature, but maintains that it is just that – a privileged mediation. in this way, he leaves room for other means of mediating narrative identity. he makes this point in a quote that warrants repeating. “self-knowledge,” he claims “is an interpretation; self interpretation, in its turn, finds in narrative, among other signs and symbols, a privileged mediation” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 188, emphasis added). ricoeur does not elucidate on the constituent elements of the set of “other signs and symbols,” but the implication that mediation extends beyond the literary world is inescapable. the fact that cultural artifacts can shape human identity is implied in ricoeur’s mimesis i, which insists that human beings are birthed into a world of stories. we are beings-immersed-in-stories, and these stories set the symbolic landscape within which society and human relationship can 6 this, of course, is not to belittle the significance, or the interplay, of literary narrative. it is virtually impossible to escape being shaped by it (at least indirectly). even if one never read such an archetypal tale as the three little pigs, one could surely learn the benefits of proper planning from the mores and norms one’s socio-cultural milieu. but we do read, everything from novels to sacred texts, and so are directly shaped by the ethical-imaginary world of literature. notwithstanding, human reflection is far more prosaic than reading. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 9 subsist harmoniously. 7 but it is also possible to arrive at this role of cultural artifact from carr’s thesis. indeed, one can extrapolate from his observation of the narrative configuration of human experience, events and actions, the conclusion that cultural symbols that shape human life can successfully do so because they are experienced as narrative themselves. they help story and restory our existence. they shape our reality as we engage them through the protentionalretentional gaze that unifies our experience. literary fiction is one such artifact that is particularly important in modern western post-enlightenment culture. but, the matrix of mediation can make room for other cultural forms that represent poetic configurations of life. a simple, yet powerful example is the transcultural symbol of sharing a meal. anthropologists would attest to the significance of communal dining in history. it is in many ways foundational to reinforcing the norms, codes, and mores that are the basis of family life, and more broadly human society. in what follows, i explore the way in which a meal can function as mediating self-understanding. my data is extracted from the plot of danish writer isak dinesen’s (1993) babette’s feast. as stated in the introduction, i approach the text at the level of the world being narrated, rather than at the level of textual criticism. in short, my analysis invites what keen (2006) calls narrative empathy: to get into the world of one of the characters in the plot – general loewenhielm – and the atmosphere of the fabled feast, so as to glean how the latter, as an event of beauty, worked to re-figure or re-story the general’s life. 8 babette’s feast dinesen situates her masterful narrative in a small, puritanical norwegian village – berlevaag – where two elderly sisters (martine and philippa) living a frugal existence, take into their home a french refugee (babette). after unexpectedly winning a large sum of money, babette prepares a prodigal feast of french cuisine for her hosts, crafted from the finest ingredients sourced from her home country. besides the two sisters, the guest list comprises a motley collection of villagers, united by longstanding allegiances to the deceased patriarch of their religious community (father to martine and philippa). 7 ricoeur (1971) has also ruminated on the nature of human action as a form of text. while he does not explicitly consider the ramifications of this thesis for his ideas on narrative, i suggest that, indirectly, his work on the textual qualities of action may provide theoretical grounds for considering how action – as cultural artifact and text – configures human life, and how it does so according to a narrative logic. 8 my choice of babette’s feast and my focus on general loewenhielm are for illustrative purposes. however, the choice is not arbitrary. dinesen’s classic tale is about how a transcultural symbol – a shared meal – may serve, through its consummate artistry, to refigure human life and clarify self-understanding. the meal’s symbolic potency is unveiled as the reader grows in appreciation of the storied lives gathered around the table. by focusing on the character of general loewenhielm, i am able to suggest one way that cultural symbols achieve the refiguring of life narratives – through aesthetic appeal or beauty. the general is particularly suited for bringing out this theme since he is the only one at dinner who truly appreciates the contingent bonanza of gustatory delights bestowed by babette’s hand. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 10 also attending is general lorens loewenhielm – a well-decorated military-man, cultural aesthete and past suitor of a young martine. his significance to the dinner’s plot is that, among the guests, he is the only one able to truly appreciate the singularly splendid quality and contingency of the meal. indeed, this revelation occasions a remarkable turn in the general’s selfunderstanding and a move towards self-reconciliation. the remainder of the essay illustrates how the narrative of the general’s life was refigured by the deep aesthetic of babette’s feast. 9 general loewenhielm: refigured by beauty on page 44 of dinesen’s text, the general is portrayed as driving to martine and philippa’s dinner in berlevaag, having returned from a parisian post to recuperate at his aunt’s house. he is going through a dark night of identity. in the twilight of an acclaimed life, he broods over his own mortality, over the perspicacity of the decisions of his youthful self, and over the apparent vanity of his subsequent life. dinesen describes the general’s existential restlessness as an anxious musing: he was a moral person, loyal to his king, his wife and his friends, an example to everybody. but there were moments when it seemed to him that the world was not a moral, but a mystic, concern. he looked into the mirror, examined the row of decorations on his breasts and sighed to himself: “vanity, vanity, all is vanity!” (dinesen, 1993, p. 45) this discernment of a mystical dimension of life is evocatively captured elsewhere in the chapter through the metaphor of sight. in his youth, loewenhielm had chosen career over a labor of love for the beautiful martine. the older general now fears that, with this choice, he had forfeited the “gift of second sight” – the vision of life’s transcendent contours beyond the veil of daily and material concerns. having experienced deeply what the world had to offer (“first sight”), the general anticipates a deeper truth: that life was more than concern for wealth, adventure, and accolade. 9 i recognize that, in focusing on the general, i am neglecting the interestingly complex and nuanced lives of the other characters, including the ways in which the meal was pivotal to their own coming to renewed self-awareness. presumably, other themes besides beauty could be developed out of these narratives. for instance, analyzing how babette’s character was impacted by the meal would be intriguing, particularly in a conceptual framework that attends to the interplay of narrative and issues of power. preparing the feast was deeply cathartic for babette because her artistic genius was stifled by a life of servitude and austerity in the home of martine and philippe. unfortunately, this genius was only apparent to the general and, arguably, rendered subject to his validation. from an alternative standpoint, one may also argue that there is an exchange of power between babette and the general occasioned by the hospitality of the meal, with the latter’s felt-sense of superiority at the dinner table, in some respects, acceding with the recognition of the culinary mastery of the former. issues of gender relations, socioeconomic status, religion, culture and ethnicity all converge to shape the unique power dynamics that are central to dinesen’s story and that are impacted by the meal event. indeed, there are many possible directions to be taken in a discussion of power and the narrative overlays of meal and dinner guests. prudence dictates, however, that such treatments – compelling as they may be – are better served in a separate essay. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 11 he approaches martine and philippa’s home hoping to expunge his existence of its inherent contradictions. he would experience again the sparse, rustic milieu that had once held love’s invitation – with its traditional meager cuisine of haddock and a glass of water. he would affirm how miserable such a life would have been. in this way, the brooding general would “make his account with young lorens loewenhielm… [and] let the youth prove to him, once and for all, that thirty-one years ago he had made the right choice” (dinesen, 1993, p. 46) when he spurned love and the simple life for career and glory. in terms of themes developed in this essay, one finds here an example of someone deeply at odds with the prevailing narratives of his life. he was, as ricoeur would put it, a being-entangled-instories: his life comprising a narrative imbrication of war glories, royal favor, a stable but unsatisfying marriage, career success and societal prestige, all tempered by a deep disquiet and an unreconciled story of long-lost love. general loewenhielm’s character exemplifies a life in search of a new narrative, or in search of re-storying. life, as a whole, is experienced as discordant, even when individual events (like a remembered dinner at paris’ café anglais) and life achievements (such as his military career) maintain their narrative cohesion, and even as the promise of a nascent wholeness (second sight) emerges in fleeting moments. there are strong resonances with both ricoeur’s and carr’s arguments here. the general’s eventual self-reconciliation would synthesize this heterogeneity of his life – with its discordant and concordant notes. narrative refiguring would also reconcile the general with the moral decision imputed to his younger self. in the crisis of self that ensued from his failed relationship with martine, the young loewenhielm made a vocational decision in favor of career. in essence, this is the “here is where i stand!” that ricoeur (1994, p. 168) states is the core assertion of moral selfhood. it is precisely this assertion that needed revisiting and reaffirming in the older general’s mind. babette’s feast occasioned this sense of narrative coherence that the general sought. but how did the meal produce a breakthrough in self-understanding? what elements specifically came into play? first, the feast could be considered as bringing together diverse constituents in a kind of plot. it brought together elements of surprise; mystery; delight; exquisite food; cheerless guests; puritanical villagers; an adorned general; diverse worlds (paris and norway); time remembered and time present; as well as the various aims, hopes, and fears of the participants. certainly, unusual and heterogeneous elements are being synthesized with culinary splendor into a unified story. it must also be pointed out that the feast was not simply reducible to a meal, however exquisite. it was rather the composite experience of food, fellowship, and festivity, which gave the event a layered, thick, and narrative quality. second, the general’s familiarity with the cuisine established the dialectic of concord and discord that unfolded with the feast. he knew the food intimately, having dined at the café anglais in paris where it appears babette was lead chef. he was the only one at the table that appreciated its exquisiteness and was at home with its subtleties. who else at the table knew (or cared about) veuve cliquot 1860? in effect, the meal allowed the general’s story of prestige and privilege to continue. yet, paralleling this congruence was a sense that the meal was misplaced. this was not a prestigious café in paris, but the humble abode of two lutheran sisters in berlesamuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 12 vaag. colonel galliffet and the other distinguished guests from memories of the café anglais were not at table. indeed, the lavish meal was seemingly squandered on the unsophisticated palettes of the villagers. this surprising and discordant coincidence of rich familiar fare with rustic setting occasioned a cathartic “pause” by the general. to make the point in terms of a key thesis in this essay: the multilayered feast was a compositional act that, in its enjoyment (akin to ricoeur’s reading-act in literary narrative), engendered a felt sense of wonder, surprise, and excitement that would compel a re-assessment (or re-figuration) of the general’s narrative understanding of life. his coparticipation (with the villagers) in the feast enabled the narrative re-figuring or re-storying of the general’s life. 10 the general’s felt-sense of wonder, surprise, and excitement effectively clued him into deep truths about the beneficence of life (what he calls “grace”). to be sure, a process of reflection accompanied the felt-sense. in effect, the general needed to make reasonable sense of the events as they were transpiring, even if he had already experienced an inner (pre-reflective) conviction of the presence of a new truth. the fact that refiguration emerged through employment of his mental faculties and through bodily awareness is significant, and is, i contend, consequent to the particular form of mediation – a feast. the distinct texture of the unique compositional artifact that is a feast – the gustatory delights and the relationships cultivated, furthered and restored – are all highly emotive of the embodied mind. it is also significant that the result of this sensing-reflective process is the recognition of a gift, or of a grace. 11 the passage in question, which heralds the general’s transition to refiguration, is memorable and poetic: we have all of us been told that grace is to be found in the universe. but in our human foolishness and short-sightedness we imagine divine grace to be finite. for this reason we tremble … before making our choice in life, and after having made it again tremble in fear of having chosen wrong. but the moment comes when our eyes are opened, and we see and realize that grace is infinite. grace, my friends, demands nothing from us but that we shall await it with confidence and acknowledge it in gratitude. grace, brothers, makes no conditions and singles out none of us in particular; grace takes us all to its bosom and proclaims general amnesty. see! that which we have chosen is given us, and that which we have refused is, also and at the same time, granted us. ay, that which we have rejected is poured upon us abundantly. for mercy and truth have met together, and righteousness and bliss have kissed one another! (dinesen, 1993, p. 52) 10 it is important to note that the general was not the author of the feast. indeed, the feast itself escaped the control of any one “author.” obviously babette played the central role in creating the meal. but the setting, ambience (or lack of it), conversation, relationships – everything that made the occasion into a feast – were co-authored by all persons present. 11 in a general sense, “grace” seems to refer in the text to a gratuitous gift or to the munificence of life. however, other interpretations, particularly religious interpretations, are proper to the text. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 13 the gift of second sight had undoubtedly and unexpectedly erupted into his life at that moment. with it, he perceived a grace – a gratuitous largesse – permeating everyday moral concerns (the realm of first sight). and, again, it was the discordant-concordant feast (food, fellowship, festivity) that inspired this revelation. the fact that his new self-understanding entailed an unexpected transcendent dimension is remarkable. not only did the general evidence a re-storying of his life, but also the narrative unity of his life took on a new and unexpected trajectory in perceiving life’s innate sacramentality. indeed, i propose that it is the contingent quality of beauty in the meal that inspired the tangential break in the general’s life narrative. 12 hopefully this thesis is apparent from the arguments made so far. nonetheless, a certain rephrasing is warranted. babette reveals in the conclusion of the story that she is an artist. she is the creator of an exquisite meal, and the co-creator of a transformative feast that was efficacious in leading the spirit of the guests beyond the existential confines of place and time. it mediated the recognition that there was a transcending “more” to life. further, this “more”o was beyond the compositional grasp of babette or the dinner guests. it was certainly adventitious – the grace-full act of an ultimate author of life. in short, the desirability of the feast extended beyond the contours of the meal, to include what may be considered a contingent spiritual in-breaking. as such, i consider the feast to be an event of beauty – beautiful not only in the artistic qualities of the meal, but also in the eruption (from the general’s perspective) of an inspiring and reconciling truth. following ricoeur’s definition, the feast was an event inasmuch as it contributed to the unfolding of the plot of the general’s life. while the reconciliation occasioned by the dinner was largely unexpected, the evening takes on a certain “narrative necessity” for the general by the end of dinesen’s account. 13 but the feast was also an event of beauty, evoking gustatory desire, as well as a sense of wonder and awe. after all, the general himself describes the power of the chef of the café anglais (babette) to transform a dinner into “a love affair of the noble and romantic category in which one no longer distinguishes between bodily and spiritual appetite or satiety!” (dinesen, 1993, p. 52) and once more, it is the feast, understood now as a thing of prodigal beauty, which brought a sense of meaning to general loewenhielm’s life, rescuing him from its myopic interpretation. the sublime and mundane, transcendent and immanent, grace and human life, they all cohere in the narrative of the meal, to re-story a life. rich fare indeed! 12 there are strong spiritual resonances in babette’s feast that cannot be substantially addressed in this essay. indeed, my use of the term beauty may offer an entry point into a theological hermeneutic of dinesen’s text. for an extended treatment on a theology of beauty see hart (2003). 13 for more on ricoeur’s distinction between an event and an occurrence in terms of narrative necessity, see (ricoeur, 1994, p. 142) samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 14 summary i have attempted to address the issue of self-understanding, identified by ricoeur as one of the three dimensions of a literary work, through an examination of the ricoeur-carr discussions on narrativity. i concluded that the two authors converge at a significant point – that selfhoodidentity may be mediated by a host of cultural artifacts, which themselves are experienced as narrative. where ricoeur privileges literary and historical fiction as archetypal in his framework, carr mentions the role of everyday life narratives as playing the mediational role. my excursion into the world of babette’s feast through the eyes of general loewenhielm was meant to illustrate the thesis that a feast, as a cultural artifact of symbolic weight, can occasion the narrative re-storying of a life. the details of babette’s feast however reveal something particularly interesting – that sharing a meal is particularly potent because it may engage the individual’s entire corporeal existence – mental, physical, and spiritual. in this way the feast, as a cultural artifact, contrasts in its mediational role from literary text. for what the former loses to the latter in terms of a proliferation of “imaginative variations,” it gains, in its holistic engagement of the person. in short, mediation is channeled not simply through the employment of mental faculties, but also through corporeality, felt-sense, and spiritual sensitivity. this observation is an important extension of ricoeur’s and (to a lesser extent) carr’s theses. references carr, d. (1986). time, narrative, and history. bloomington, in: indiana university press. carr, d., taylor, c., & ricoeur, p. (1991). discussion: ricoeur on narrative. in d. wood (ed.), on paul ricoeur: narrative and interpretation (pp. 160-187). london, uk: routledge. dinesen, i. (1993). babette's feast. in anecdotes of destiny and ehrengard. new york, ny: vintage books. hart, d. b. (2003). the beauty of the infinite: the aesthetics of christian truth. grand rapids, mi: mich. w.b. eerdmans. kearney, r. (2006). parsing narrative story, history, life. human studies, 29(4), 477-490. keen, s. (2006). a theory of narrative empathy. narrative, 14(3), 207-236. ricoeur, p. (1971). the model of the text: meaningful action considered as a text. social research, 38(3), 529-562. ricoeur, p. (1991a). life in quest of narrative. in d. wood (ed.), on paul ricoeur: narrative and interpretation (pp. 20-33). london, uk: routledge. ricoeur, p. (1991b). narrative identity. in d. wood (ed.), on paul ricoeur: narrative and interpretation (pp. 188-199). london, uk: routledge. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 15 ricoeur, p. (1994). the self and narrative identity. in oneself as another, trans k. blamey, (pp. 140-168). chicago, il: university of chicago press. microsoft word kearney corrected proof version4.docx corresponding author: dr. richard kearney the charles b. seelig professor in philosophy philosophy department boston college, chestnut hill, ma email: kearneyr@bc.edu journal of applied hermeneutics december 10, 2011 the author(s) 2011 what is diacritical hermeneutics? richard kearney what is diacritical hermeneutics? first a brief word on what i mean by hermeneutics generally, then several words on the qualifier, diacritical.1 i understand hermeneutics as an art of deciphering multiple meaning. in its most basic sense this relates to the human capacity to have ‘two thinks at a time,’ as james joyce said. more precisely, it refers to the practice of discerning indirect, tacit or allusive meanings, of sensing another sense beyond or beneath apparent sense. this special human activity may in turn call for a method of secondorder, reflective interpretation involving a process of disclosing concealed messages, either by a) unmasking covered-up meaning (hermeneutics of suspicion) or b) by disclosing surplus meaning (hermeneutics of affirmation). in short, i understand hermeneutics as the task of interpreting (hermeneuein) plural meaning in response to the polysemy of language and life.2 hermeneutics, thus viewed, is an activity carried out in the name of its founding spirit, hermes: messenger of gods, guardian of thresholds, and carrier of cryptic codes. the three original disciplines of hermeneutics, formulated by friedrich schleiermacher in the 19th century, were theology, law, and philology. why these? because each solicited an interpretation of dual meanings: a) divine and human (theology), b) prosecutorial and defensive (law), c) ancient and actual (philology). all three disciplines called for a method of discriminating between different and often conflicting readings. wilhelm dilthey would add ‘history’ to the list as a universal human science devoted to reading between past and present; a science, which he saw as a model for a general hermeneutics of life as it interprets itself. whence the birth of philosophical hermeneutics. later, heidegger would broaden the definition further in speaking of an ontological hermeneutic committed to understanding the fundamental difference between being and beings a task based on a pre-understanding of our everyday existence as being-towarddeath. the famous hermeneutic circle. finally, and more recently, thinkers like gadamer, ricoeur, and caputo have augmented the contemporary project of philosophical hermeneutics in various significant ways (semantic, psychoanalytic, deconstructive). but what all these different hermeneutic movements share is a commitment to the task of adjudicating kearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 2 between different levels of meaning. so where exactly does diacritical hermeneutics fit in? and how might it contribute to the hermeneutic legacy described above? i have already sketched my project of diacritical hermeneutics in the introduction to strangers gods and monsters and other related texts.3 but as john caputo has remarked, this project has, to date, been more performed than explained. i will attempt to redress the balance here by addressing the question under five main headings: 1) in the most obvious sense, dia-critical involves a critical function of interrogation. i mean this in the modern sense of the term from kant’s three critiques down to the more contemporary movements of critical theory from horkheimer and adorno to habermas and foucault. in this broad sweep, i would obviously include critiques of race, class, gender, power, and the unconscious: all critical philosophies, which carry on the legacy, amongst others, of the ‘three masters of suspicion’ (freud, marx, and nietzsche). in short, i understand critique here as both a) an inquiry into the conditions of possibility of meaning; and b) a critical exposure of ‘masked’ power in the name of liberation and justice. this latter more ethico-political aspect of critique is one i find lacking in most mainstream hermeneutic methods to date (dilthey, heidegger, gadamer) until we arrive at ricoeur’s hermeneutics of suspicion and vattimo’s hermeneutics of subversion. 2) second, dia-critical involves the criteriological function of discerning between competing claims to meaning. this comprises hermeneutic retrievals of previous testimonies as well as future oriented projects utopian, messianic, eschatological. ‘emancipation is itself a tradition,’ as ricoeur says; it is a form of ‘anticipatory memory.’ the idea of emancipation does not erupt ex nihilo. it does not start with modern revolutions and the enlightenment; rather it draws from a whole palimpsest of prior narratives of liberation going back, in the west, to biblical stories of exodus and the socratic awakening. aristotle addresses the question of ethical criteria already when he remarks that if you wish to communicate the meaning of a virtue you recount the story of someone who embodies it e.g., achilles for courage, penelope for constancy, tiresius for wisdom. such narratives ancient or modern provide phronesis with exemplary paradigms by which to measure, judge, and act. otherwise how could one tell the difference between just and unjust actions? these differences require careful criteriological discriminations. and there are obviously other essential criteria apart from the narrative one mentioned (e.g., rational deliberation of rights, virtue ethics, pragmatist judgment, phenomenological intuition of values, spiritual exercises, feminist and socio-cultural critiques, wisdom traditions etc.). in short, pace deconstruction, i am not against criteria as long as they involve vigilant discernments and distinctions. 3) third, in keeping with the more precise dictionary definition of dia-critical, i refer to a grammatological attention to inflections of linguistic marks. in this technical sense, diacritics provides rules for differentiating between minute units of language (signifiers, graphemes, accents). think, for example, of the difference, which the following accents grave, acute, circumflex, and diaeresis make on the same letter in the french language: é è ê, ë. or think of how ‘où’ with an accent (meaning ‘where’) differs from ‘ou’ without accent (meaning ‘or’). these silent, discreet signs distinguish between values of the same character. small graphic demarcations thus serve to avoid confusion between otherwise identical letters, helping us differentiate between distinct meanings. more generally, in kearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 3 structural and post-structural linguistics, diacritics denotes a way of reading differentially, across gaps and oppositions, in keeping with the saussurian maxim that language is a network of ‘differences without positive terms’. in these respects, diacritics is all about microreading. and here, i think, i share common ground with john caputo’s radical hermeneutics and jacques derrida’s deconstruction.4 4) in addition to this technical usage in linguistic and semiotic practice, diacritics also has the older diagnostic meaning of reading the body. the greek terms, dia-krinein and dia-krisis, referred to the medical or therapeutic practice of diagnosing symptoms of bodily fevers, colorations, and secretions. in this sense, the word designated the hermeneutic art of discriminating between health and disease. such a skill to read between the lines of skin and flesh in order to sound the movements of the soul (homeopathic or allopathic) was often a matter of life and death. needless to say, this model of micrological reading of somatic and psychosomatic symptoms has deep implications for the practice of philosophical reading in its own right. i agree with wittgenstein that philosophy is therapy. in sum, diacritical hermeneutics should do you good! 5) these four characteristics – critical, criteriological, grammatological and diagnostic comprise the basis of what i call, finally and most primally, ‘carnal hermeneutics.’ here we are concerned with a hermeneutics that goes all the way down. it covers diacritical readings of different kinds of others human, animal or divine. all with skins on. such carnal hermeneutics has a crucial bearing, to take just one example, on how we ‘sense’ subtle distinctions between hostile and hospitable strangers (the same term, hostis can refer to guest or enemy). and pursuing this example i would say that diacritical hermeneutics has two patron saints the god hermes and the dog argos.5 for if hermes discloses hermetic messages from above, argos brings animal savvy from below. the former guides our deciphering of cryptic masks and messages (hermes appears to baucis disguised as a beggar). the latter, argos, imparts a canine flair for recognizing the friend or enemy in the visitor (e.g., odysseus returned to ithaca to oust the suitors).6 diacritical hermeneutics may thus be defined as both sacred and terrestrial in so far as it ranges up and down in ascending and descending spirals from the highest hintings of the absolute to the lowest soundings of the abyss. while hands reach up, feet reach down. but no matter how high or low hermeneutic ‘sense’ goes, it never leaves us totally in the dark. it is not blind but half-seeing and halfbelieving. it is a sort of incarnate phronesis, which probes, scents, and filters. something akin to wittgenstein’s seeing-as in our most ordinary perceptions or heidegger’s understanding-as in our most basic moods (see his analysis of verstehen-befindlichkeit in being and time). this fundamental form of existential sensibility is further radicalized in merleau-ponty’s more embodied notion of ‘diacritical perception’ to which i shall return below.7 at this stage, and by way of addressing some of the more recent discussions of hermeneutics, we might ask how our fivefold model of diacritical hermeneutics compares with john caputo’s method of ‘radical hermeneutics’ inspired by derrida’s deconstruction. while the diacritical and radical approaches share a common commitment to micro-logical reading, there are significant differences. in contrast to deconstructive sanssavoir, diacritical hermeneutics practices a certain savoir, which goes beyond derrida’s maxim of ‘reading in the dark.’ diacritical savoir should, i suggest, be understood in its original etymological sense of tasting: sakearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 4 vourer, sapere, sapientia. it is not knowledge, in the purely cognitive or theoretical attitude (here i agree with deconstruction); but it is some kind of savvy nonetheless. sense as primal interpretation, reading between the lines of skin and flesh. a sensing, which makes sense in the three connotations of the french sens: sensation, direction, meaning. i am concerned here, in short, with a multilayered sensing which goes all the way up and down like jacob’s ladder from thought to touch and back again.8 meaning ascending and descending in open-ended spirals. * by way of elaborating further on the different inflections between diacritical hermeneutics and deconstruction let me explore for a moment the implications of what i call ‘diacritical sensation.’ i refer here, most simply, to familiar phrases like ‘i don’t know how to read you?’ or ‘your face betrays your feelings’ or the proverbial ‘the eyes are the mirrors of the soul.’ lady macbeth puts it well to her husband, ‘your face is like a book, my thane, where men may read strange matters.’ mostly such phrases are used in relation to facial expressions glancing or shading of eyes, widening of pupils, raising of eyebrows, altering of complexion, stiffening or loosening of lips, smiling or grimacing of mouth. but facial vision, as bearer of inner moods, deep feelings and moral emotions, is not the only medium of expression. in addition to our ability to see (or see through) we also have the ability to hear, touch, smell and taste. each sense has its own special savoir/saveur and is deeply structured in terms of body mapping, orientation and negotiation. sensing is never neutral. every sense possesses its particular symbolique, as levi-strauss demonstrated in his structural anthropology of la pensée sauvage. even the most basic culture of food is a way of carving up our universe into edible and inedible, raw and cooked, herbivorous and carnivorous, hostile and hospitable. matters of taste are often matters of inclusion and exclusion, even of life or death. and taste here is as literal as it is figural (since it subverts the distinction); or, more accurately, it is not just a matter of aesthetic indifference, as kant held, but of actual savoring upon the lips, tongue and palette. man is what he eats, as the old adage goes; but he is also how he eats. the contents of the menu are less important than how one chooses this dish or that, or mixes flavors and savors, or why one sits down to the meal in the first place. chaqu’un à son goût. taste is, perhaps, the primordial sense of carnal hermeneutics. the most alimentary is the most elementary. for tasting is already, ab initio, a transfiguring of nature into culture. it involves a splitting of the world into binaries which may remain opposed or symbolically combine.9 a dialectic of sundering and salvation through food is to be found in most wisdom traditions. adam and eve taste the apple. abraham and sarah dine with sacred strangers. krishna swallows the puff of rice giving fullness back to emptiness. jesus breaks bread in emmaus restoring his broken body. isis’s fish consumes the dismembered flesh of osiris. each great wisdom tradition is, it seems, marked by such moments of inaugural eating. let me say a few words about just one of these foundational scenes before returning to a more phenomenological account of diacritical sensation. * one of the oldest records of sacred eating, in the western indo-european tradition, is to be found in the taittiriya upanishad. here we read how the divine manifests itself in the offering and eating of food.10 ‘treat your guests like gods’ (1.11.2) when giving food, we are kearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 5 told, for ‘that (food) is brahman.’ (3.1) the true self of mind and vital breath was considered to dwell within food, considered as an interconnection between the cosmic elements of air and earth. (3.9) the task of the host is to discern this culinary ‘correspondence’ and thereby recognize the god within the guest. offering hospitality to the guest is a sacred act in that it reminds us of the integrity of body and soul illustrated by the equation: food-true happiness-brahman. the upanishad concludes with a resounding paean to the transfiguring power of food. the self becomes sacred in a sacramental identification with eating: ‘i am food! i eat him who eats the food! i have conquered the whole universe! i am like the light in the firmament.’ (3.10.6) this ancient belief found classic expression in the formula: ‘anna (food) the first manifestation of brahman’; and it later became the basis for a long vedantic tradition of hospitality where saintly figures offer themselves as food and reveal themselves in the act of eating and being eaten. the unexpected guest (athiti) who asks to be fed is a god waiting to become manifest. in feeding the guest we greet the divine and taste its food. a primal act of carnal hermeneutics. we find clear affinities here with similar acts of sacred hospitality in biblical literature. recall again abraham and sarah feeding the three divine strangers at mamre (gen); or christ offering his body as eucharistic bread at the last supper and at emmaus; or returning as the stranger (hospes) who asks and receives food from passersby. (matt 25) i have treated such inaugural scenes of sacred transformation between hosts and guests elsewhere, so i will not dwell further on them now.11 suffice it to note that the sacred sharing of food is not confined to hindu or biblical traditions but is also to be found in buddhist, greek and other cultural myths of gods appearing as guests at the table of hospitality. on studying such recurring motifs one might be tempted to infer the existence of some trans-cultural, or quasi-universal, practice of gustatory hospitality. and one might be right. but such comparative theologies of the tongue themselves involve a work of diacritical hermeneutics a second-order methodical interpretation of first-order interpretations of carnal communication between hosts and guests.12 all such primal scenes of eating, across diverse religions and cultures, bear witness to common practices of tasting the divine in the human and the human in the divine. they offer us choice ingredients for a gourmet guide to the gods. delicate dégustations of hidden things. it might be noted, finally, that if gustatory hospitality is one inaugural practice of civilizations, sexual hospitality is another. note, for example, how in biblical scripture sarah and mary both experience ‘miraculous conceptions’ (sarah is barren, mary a virgin) when they receive strangers into their heartswombs (chora), while many heroines of hellenic, celtic and eastern mythologies have carnal congress with guests-become-gods. in such founding narratives, touch, smell, sight and sound are often synaesthesized with taste in the meetings of gods and mortals. from the beginning divinity becomes flesh in multiple ways. the polysemy of such primal enfleshment is, i submit, a key task of diacritical hermeneutics. * we do not, however, have to look to the ancient narratives to find evidence for the diacritical connoisseurship of the senses. we already find examples of such carnal hermeneutics in our everyday sensations. here we might take special heed of the pioneering phenomenology of merleau-ponty, and in particular his notion of ‘diacritical perception.’ this idea was first developed in his collège de france lecture courses, la conscience et kearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 6 l’acquisition du language (1950) and le monde sensible et le monde de l’expression (1953, henceforth msme). borrowing liberally from saussure's notion that words only signify by virtue of their differences with other words, merleau-ponty argues that meanings are never given as isolated terms or objects but always as parts of a mobile interaction of signs involving intervals, absences, folds and gaps (écarts). this is not just a function of language, however, but the very structure of perception itself. insofar as perception is thus structured like language in its nascent state it is diacritical. here is how merleau-ponty puts it in an important note from his 1953 lectures: diacritical notion of the perceptual sign. this is the idea that we can perceive differences without terms, gaps with regard to a level (of meaning) which is not itself an object the only way to give perception a consciousness worthy of itself and which does not alter the perceived into an ob-ject, into the signification of an isolating or reflexive attitude. (msme, p. 203-204) in a subsequent note entitled ‘diacritical perception’ no longer merely a ‘notion’ but now a sensible quality of perception itself merleau-ponty adds this intriguing example. to see another’s visage is to interpret it carnally ‘as’ this or that form of expression: to perceive a physiognomy, an expression, is always to deploy diacritical signs, in the same manner as one realizes an expressive gesticulation with one's body. here each (perceptual) sign has the unique virtue of differentiating from others, and these differences which appear for the onlooker or are used by the speaking subject are not defined by the terms between which they occur, but rather define these in the first place. (msme, p. 211) this logic of diacritical perception is alien to the classical approach of difference presupposing identity. on the contrary, writes merleau-ponty, the identity of terms emerges in the tension of their differences, their contours arising from the encroachment (empiètement) of things on things. and here he coins the term ‘infra-thing’ in contradistinction to the old notion of discrete objective substances. here merleau-ponty departs from the aristotelian habit of defining something new in terms of a preexisting genre or foundation. diacritical perception through gaps reveals the inadequate character of the traditional one-to-one correlation between consciousness and object; such derived correspondence arises only in retrospect and ignores the fact that there never was an object in the first place but only several different infra-things, and at the very minimum a reversible interplay between figure and ground (fond). this plurality of infra-things is irreducible to the dualist framework of an isolated mind faced with an isolated object. diacritical perception is, merleau-ponty insists, the sensing of meaning as it expresses itself in the intervals between such infra-things of our experience. it involves our sense of identity through differentiation rather than differentiation through identity.13 our most basic carnal sensations may thus be said to be structured diacritically in so far as they are structured like the phonetic differentiations of language. “to have a body capable of expressive articulation or action and to have a phonetic system capable of constructing signs, is the same thing” (msme, p. 204). our body schemas, merleau-ponty claims, operate like phonetic systems which function according to principles of which they are not conscious (e.g., parole is not conscious of langue). but to compare carnal perception to linguistic structure in this way is not to reduce the latter to the former (naturalism), nor to kearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 7 reduce the former to the latter (structuralism). nature does not make the body any more than it makes phonetic systems. and it would be a mistake to construe the perceptual capacity to play with principles of which it is not immediately aware as some kind of ‘unconscious.’ perception of figure is not simultaneously perception of ground but rather ‘imperception’: the sensing of the invisible in and through the visible, a ‘sentir en profondeur,’ by negations, absences, gaps (écarts). or as merleau-ponty puts it in gestalt language: “consciousness of the figure is consciousness without knowledge of the ground (fond)” (msme, p. 204). we may say therefore that diacritical perception witnesses the birth of expression, against an unformed background, as a meaning which begins and re-begins, an awakening which takes the form of a figure that is prefigured and refigured again and again, now fore, now aft, now here, now there.14 hence the importance of merleau-ponty’s metaphor of modulation: “consider sensation itself, the act of sensing (le sentir), as the intervening of a figure on a fond. modulation. as a sound modulates silence. as a color modulates an open space by varying it. every sign is diacritical” (msme, p. 206). and merleau-ponty adds significantly, “this is valéry’s idea,” thereby indicating that his use of the term ‘diacritical’ is as indebted to literary poetics as it is to structural linguistics. either way, this birth of meaning occurs not in the manner of a foundational cause (as in the old metaphysics) but as a diacritical play of visible and invisible, an embodied vigilance capable of signaling and resuscitating full being (l’être total) on the basis of a fragment (msme, p. 204205). this diacritical interplay between figure et fond represents an endless reversibility for what is one perceiver’s figure is another's fond and vice versa. the diacritical art of perception, enacted in the advent of sensing, ultimately amounts, in merleau-ponty’s view, to the displacement of natural cause by cultural expression. in the 1953 lecture notes, merleau-ponty offers one further telling illustration of the diacritical isomorphism of perception and language. he compares the perception of movement to the comprehension of a sentence. we only understand the beginning of a sentence from its end, he says, just as we only perceive movement in light of its goal. perception does not follow something as it displaces itself from one fixed place to another, as if one solid object succeeded another; it proceeds rather as a wave which stretches back and forth across distances in the same manner as a sentence circulates through a whole linguistic field. carnal sensation is a fold (pli) in the moving flesh of the world; there is no world without it and it cannot be without a world. “like signs in language,” writes merleau-ponty, “the points traversed in movement have only a diacritical value; they do not function in themselves as places but rather as passages in the same way as words of a sentence are traces of an intention which (invisibly) transpierces them” (msme, p. 205). or to put it another way, perception operates like language in that it does not confront an ob-ject head on, but senses things which speak to it laterally, on the side, provoking one’s ‘complicity’ in the manner of an ‘obsession.’ less objective than obsessional, then, the thing perceived ‘solicits’ us (valéry). like an epiphany that calls for remembrance (proust); or a poetic word which invites conaissance (claudel); or a pregnancy that yearns for birth and rebirth (bachelard); or a frosted branch whose every crystal signals a whole order of emergent meanings (stendhal). with all these literary analogies, merleauponty is suggesting that each perception of the world constructs itself on the basis of an emerging part which solicits our co-creation of this world; just as language constructs itself in terms of a circular movement between a kearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 8 present part and absent whole. (merleauponty also uses here the analogy of a film montage where each frame functions in the movements between gaps across an invisible background). but it is important to remind ourselves here that the diacritical model of carnal interpretation is not a matter of voluntarist invention (à la sartre). it is not a question of reading into something but of reading from (à partir) something. we are solicited by the flesh of the world before we read ourselves back into it. carnal attention is as much reception as creation. we are far from idealism. and this is why i think merleau-ponty insists that the solicitation of our body schema functions symbolically, laterally, indirectly, like a sexual or ontological surprise. diacritical sensation, across distances and intervals, comes not just from us but from another person or thing that meets us ‘like a stranger in the dark.’ merleau-ponty again cites paul valéry to make his point. “a man is nothing so long as nothing draws from him effects and productions which surprise him” (msme, p. 205). but to be surprised one must be ready to receive, open to solicitation and seduction, prepared to partake of the thing sensed and symbolized. every sense, as merleau-ponty concludes, has its own symbolique. every carnal act and organ inscribes its own imaginaire. from sexual expression to the act of eating itself. nature is already culture as soon as we sense it as this or that. sensation is expression and expression sensation. flesh is word and word flesh. hence the significance of merleau-ponty’s description of perception in terms of a diacritical eucharistic communion: just as the sacrament not only symbolizes, in sensible species, an operation of grace, but is also the real presence of god, which it causes to occupy a fragment of space and communicates to those who eat of the consecrated bread, provided that they are inwardly prepared, in the same way the sensible has not only a motor and vital significance, but is nothing other than a certain way of being in the world suggested to us from some point in space, and seized and acted upon by our body, provided that it is capable of doing so, so that sensation is literally a form of communion.15 what we have here is a basic analogy of proper proportionality: a is to b what c is to d. namely, the sacrament of transubstantiation is to the responsive communicant what the sensible is to the capable perceiver. merleau-ponty goes on to delineate this quasieucharistic power of the sensible as follows: i am brought into relation with an external being, whether it be in order to open myself to it or to shut myself off from it. if the qualities radiate around them a certain mode of existence, if they have the power to cast a spell and what we called just now a sacramental value, this is because the sentient subject does not posit them as objects, but enters into a sympathetic relation with them, makes them his own and finds in them his momentary law.16 in other words, each sensory encounter with the strangeness of the world is an invitation to a ‘natal pact’ where, through what we might call ‘diacritical sympathy,’ the human self and the strange world give birth to one another. sacramental sensation is a reversible rapport between myself and others, wherein the sensible gives birth to itself through me. a fine example of carnal hermeneutics. everyday perception as exquisite empathy. * kearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 9 let me add, finally, that because diacritical hermeneutics is carnal in the first and last instance it fulfills itself as applied.17 to say that understanding is incarnate is to say that it answers to the life of suffering and action. its application to human embodiment is its original and ultimate end. and here we return to its diagnostic role as a caring for lived existence a listening to the pulse of suffering and solicitation between one human being and another. and, at times, between human being and that which precedes and exceeds it. it is in the passages ‘between’ that the dia of diacritical takes on its full meaning. diagnosis calls for endless dialogue: between disciplines, between text and action, between word and flesh, and above all between human persons who give and receive wisdom, attention, and healing. notes 1this essay is a development of a talk delivered to the canadian hermeneutics institute at the university of calgary in june 2011. 2 this outline of a general philosophical hermeneutics is particularly indebted to paul ricoeur, in the wake of the prior formulations of hans-georg gadamer and martin heidegger. see also note 8 on ricoeur below. 3 for my previous descriptions of diacritical hermeneutics see the introduction to my strangers, gods and monsters (london: routledge, 2003); interview in my debates in contemporary philosophy (new york: fordham university press, 2007, p. 249250); ‘a dialogue in diacritical hermeneutics’ in le souci du passage, essays in honour of jean greisch (edited by philippe capelle, edition du cerf, paris, 2004); ‘entre soi-meme et un autre: l'herméneutique diacritique de ricoeur’ in ricoeur: cahier de l'herne (edited by francois azouvi and myriam revault d'allonnes , l'herne, paris, 2004); ‘eros, diacritical hermeneutics and god’ in philosophy today, vol. 55 special spep issue (edited by cynthia willett and leonard lawlor, 2011); and ‘diacritical hermeneutics’ in maria luisa portocarrero, luis umbelino, and andrzej wiercinski, ed., hermeneutic rationality/la rationalité herméneutique (münster: lit verlag, 2011), p. 177-196. i find my thinking on diacritical hermeneutics resonates, at times, with the recent work of jean greisch, merold westphal, peter kemp and david tracy. 4 i am particularly indebted to john caputo and jacques derrida on this question of micrological reading and the attendant notion of our textured experience as a basic form of écriture, which for me rejoins in interesting ways the old medieval idea of the liber mundi (‘semiological ontology’) and the earlier greek idea of the logos of nature as a primary tacit language (logos endiathetos) calling for a more articulate verbal language (logos prophorikos). heraclitus and the stoics were obvious proponents of this notion of logos-inphusis which, of course, was later retrieved in the christian notion of the ‘word made flesh’ (see augustine’s reworking of the stoic logoi spermatikoi) and the kabbalistic notion of the world as traced by the secret letters of creation (sefer yetsirah). in his late work, the visible and the invisible, merleau-ponty offers an interesting hermeneutic retrieval of the logos prophorikos/ endiathetos distinction from the point of view of what i am calling a carnal-diacritical phenomenology. see also his essays on embodied language in signs (in particular ‘indirect language and the voices of silence’) and our discussion below of his notion of ‘diacritical perception’ in his collège de france course notes of 1953. 5 the name of the dog, argos, who recognizes odysseus in bk 17 of the odyssey is derived from the greek word argos meaning gleaming, shining (from which the latin term for kearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 10 silver, argentum, is derived). the word enargeis is used by homer in bk 16 to mark the ‘shining’ of the goddess athena which transforms odysseus from a beggar-stranger back into himself, but unlike the dog argos, his own son, telemachus, does not at first recognize his father, mistaking him instead for a god. it is telling, i think, that this connection between argos/enargeis and diacritical hermeneutics occurs in one of the oldest texts in western literature: a lesson in how to discern between mortal and immortal strangers through our carnal senses; indeed a lesson which, homer suggests, dogs may well have to teach men! i am grateful to richard capobianco for bringing this passage from the odyssey to my attention in martin heidegger, ‘on the question concerning the determination of the matter for thinking’, trans. richard capobianco and marie göbel, epoché 14(2) (spring 2010) p. 213-23. 6 it is telling that the first thing father and son do in the moment of mutual disclosure is to eat a meal, the two ‘strangers’ (hospes) becoming host (hospes) and guest (hospes) to each other. one finds a similar polysemy at work in the greek term xenos (stranger, guest, enemy). a good example of diacritical hermeneutics as hospitality (xenizein). see our discussion of these terminological and etymological variations of hospes, hostis and xenos in anatheism: returning to god after god (columbia university press, new york, 2010, pp. 27-28, 47-49). 7 we could also include here max scheler’s account of embodied ethical feeling in forms of sympathy, julia kristeva’s psychoanalytic reading of semiotic unconscious experience in desire in language and later work; and emmanuel levinas’ ethico-phenomenological analysis of pre-conceptual ‘sensibility’ in otherwise than being. see, for example, how levinas describes the relation of subjectivity as one of ‘sensibility’ and ‘vulnerablity’ to pleasure and pain (ibid., chapter 3) a form of radical carnal ‘contact,’ ‘proximity,’ and ‘exposure’ prior to intentionality and consciousness. “the exposure to another is,” he writes, “proximity, obsession by the neighbor, an obsession despite oneself, that is, a pain” (ibid., p. 55). levinas does not deny this is already a form of language: but it is language in its most primordial expression/obsession: an ethical ‘saying’ before the ‘said’ of thematization and representation, a language where the self does not give signs but is itself a sign of saying (ibid., p. 47). this is what levinas means when he says that sensing is ‘saying’ (le dire) or pre-thematic ‘signifying’ (signifyingness or signifiance). i am indebted here to james taylor’s essay, ‘after the modern subject: between activity and passivity in heidegger, levinas and gadamer’ in maria luisa portocarrero, luis umbelino, and andrzej wiercinski, ed., hermeneutic rationality/la rationalité herméneutique (münster: lit verlag, 2011). see also the recent phenomenological work of jeffrey bloechl on levinas’ notion of sensibility as well as the recent phenomenological writings of jean-luc marion on the erotic phenomenon, jean-louis chrétien on the mystical-poetic body and of michel henry’s phenomenology of life. michel serres’ work on the five senses, though not directly of the hermeneuticalphenomenological tradition, is also of relevance here. 8 for earlier sketches of a carnal hermeneutics of discernment see our strangers, gods and monsters, chapters 3-5 and 7; anatheism, chapters 1-2 and 5; and ‘at the threshold: foreigners, strangers, others’ in richard kearney and kascha semonovitch, eds., phenomenologies of the stranger: between hostility and hospitality (new york: fordham university press, 2011, pp. 3-29). one might also mention here the seminal work of my mentor, paul ricoeur, and especially his sketch of a phenomenology of the body in kearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 11 freedom and nature: the voluntary and the involuntary (1960). in this volume, ricoeur states that human existence is torn between “two fundamental projects”, namely “the organic life” searching for immediate completion and “the spiritual life” of thinking aiming at the perfection of the whole. this ‘most primordial conflict’ epitomises “the disproportion of βίος and λόγος”. the site of this conflict between βίος and λόγος, he writes, is ‘my body’ and it is unbridgeable. the governing principle between the animal and the human is “my body” a point that is analysed in three sections of freedom and nature, i) “introduction: corporeal existence within the limits of eidetics”; ii) “body and the total field of motivation: the level of history and the level of the body” (4); and iii) “life: birth”. in the context of his subsequent work, fallible man (1960) while perhaps still under the formative influence of both edmund husserl’s phenomenology of leib and of gabriel marcel’s existential notion of ‘incarnation’ ricoeur takes “my body” to be “an originating mediator ‘between’ myself and the world”. and, he claims, it is precisely this body which provides the means for both acting in the world and distancing myself from the natural: it opens me onto the world, either allowing perceived things to appear or making me dependent on things i lack and of which i experience the need and desire because they are elsewhere or even nowhere in the world…in a word, my body opens me to the world by everything it is able to do. this analysis he concludes with the claim: “[my body] is implicated as a power in the instrumentality of the world, in the practicable aspects of this world that my action furrows through, in the products of work and art.” this shift from “my body” to the more linguistic functions of work and art (poetic language) already anticipates ricoeur’s hermeneutic turn in the sixties. ricoeur’s early phenomenology of the body remains, however, largely a promissory note. after his embrace of a hermeneutics of signs he rarely returns to an exploration of the flesh, though it is tempting to see his preoccupation with the relation between force and sens that is between an energetics of drive/desire and a philosophy of interpretation in freud as a gesture in this direction (freud and philosophy, 1965). his engagement with aristotle’s notion of cathartic passions in volume i of time and narrative (1983) and proust’s world of involuntary sensations and embodied epiphanies in volume 2 of time and narrative (1984) might well have been further occasions to sound a carnal hermeneutics of taste, smell and touch (proust’s own favored senses); but ricoeur opts instead for an ‘apprenticeship of signs’ which largely ignores the deeper opacities of the carnal unconscious. and his sustained fascination with spinoza’s conatus does not alas connect the ‘desire to be’ with an incarnate bearer of this desire. it is desire without skin. finally, though one’s hopes are revived somewhat when one comes to ricoeur’s mention of our ‘corporeal/terrestrial’ condition in study 6 of oneself as another (1990) and his dialectic of embodiment and alterity in the final study 10 of oneself as another, this turns out to be minimalist a five page adjudication between husserl and levinas on the other. it is more a mediation between two rival positions on the flesh as action/passion too much activity in husserl, too much passivity in levinas than a serious diacritical engagement with the enigma of enfleshment per se. (and this inspite of his invocation of ‘flesh’ in his summary list of imponderable others’ in the final paragraph of the book). work remains to be done on bringing ricoeur’s phenomenology of the body/bios/eros into fertile dialogue with merleau-ponty’s radical analysis of ‘diacritical perception’ and la chair. (i am indebtkearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 12 ed to timo helenius for several of these references). another missed dialogue that could be mentioned here is that between ricoeur and the feminist hermeneutics of the body running from luce irigaray and julia kristeva to judith butler and elizabeth grosz. see the timely essay, ‘understanding the body: the relevance of gadamer’s and ricoeur’s view of the body for feminist theory’, louise derksen and annemie halsema, in george taylor and francis mootz, gadamer and ricoeur: critical horizons or contemporary hermeneutics (continuum, new york, 2011). amongst other texts, they discuss ricoeur’s little known essay, ‘wonder, eroticism and enigma’ in cross currents, vol. 14, 1969. 9 see claude lévi-strauss, structural anthropology (new york: penguin, 1968). 10 see francis clooney, ‘food, the guest, and the taittiriya upanishad: hospitality in the hindu traditions’ in richard kearney and james taylor, ed., hosting the stranger: between religions (new york: continuum, 2010), pp. 139-146. 11 see chapters 1, 4 and 5 of anatheism. 12 for comparative cultural/religious examples of gustatory hospitality see also the recent essays of kalpana seshadri, andy rotman, joseph lumbard, and marianne moyaert in kearney and taylor, ed., hosting the stranger: between religions. the example of the classic graeco-roman myth of baucis and philomen is also relevant here in that it tells how this old poor couple became hosts to zeus and hermes who first appeared as beggars and only revealed themselves as gods when baucis offered them her best herbs and philomen his precious goose. here is a passage from ovid’s metamorphoses book viii which shows the central transformative role of ‘food’ in this primal scene of carnal hospitality. note the detailed description of the culinary preparation and offering of each dish, comprising a good portion of ovid’s short text: the old woman (baucis), her skirts tucked up, her hands trembling, placed a table there, but a table with one of the three legs unequal: a piece of broken pot made them equal. pushed underneath, it countered the slope, and she wiped the level surface with fresh mint. on it she put the black and green olives that belong to pure minerva, and the cornelian cherries of autumn, preserved in wine lees; radishes and endives; a lump of cheese; and lightly roasted eggs, untouched by the hot ashes; all in clay dishes. after this she set out a carved mixing bowl for wine, just as costly, with cups made of beech wood, hollowed out, and lined with yellow bees’ wax. there was little delay, before the fire provided its hot food, and the wine, of no great age, circulated, and then, removed again, made a little room for the second course. there were nuts, and a mix of dried figs and wrinkled dates; plums, and sweet-smelling apples in open wicker baskets; and grapes gathered from the purple vines. in the center was a gleaming honeycomb. above all, there was the additional presence of well-meaning faces, and no unwillingness, or poverty of spirit. meanwhile the old couple noticed that, as soon as the mixing bowl was empty, it refilled itself, unaided, and the wine appeared of its own accord. they were fearful at this strange and astonishing sight, and timidly baucis and philemon murmured a prayer, their palms upwards, and begged the gods’ forgiveness for the meal, and their unpreparedness. they had a goose, the guard for their tiny cottage: as hosts they prepared to sacrifice it for their divine guests. but, quick-winged, it wore the old people out and, for a long time, eskearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 13 caped them, at last appearing to take refuge with the gods themselves. then the heaven-born ones told them not to kill it. ‘we are gods,’ they said. (ovid, metamorphoses, bk viii: “philomen and baucis,” trans. anthony s. kline, university of virginia, 2000) in ‘departures: hospitality as mediation’, kalpana seshadri offers a hermeneutic commentary on an analogous story in the bhaghavata purana (bk 10, cantos 80-81). it relates how a poor man kuchela offers a meager bowl of puffed rice to his friend krishna who gleefully eats the mere nothing and returns the gift of a nothing that is the ultimate fullness. this emptiness in fullness recalls the emptying/filling wine bowl of philomenon and baucis, as well as the buddhist notion that ‘emptiness’ is the highest form of fullness. seshadri offers this commentary: the poor scholar (kuchela) gathers together, in a piece of clean sari torn from his wife's shoulder, a heap of puffed rice, itself borrowed from a kindly neighbor emptiness itself, rice with kernels removed, with nothing inside. and this he sets out to give to him, the friend who had the great capacity to receive...the friend sinks his palm in the heap of rice and opening his mouth wide eats a fistful with sheer delight, of the emptiness and the nothing, and reaches for more, and yet more...and as the friend empties the emptiness within the puffed rice, the scholar feels himself filling up. his satisfaction is immeasurable. incalculable happiness and fortune accrue to him, the more he gives of what he does not have, the more he finds himself receiving what he could not imagine. can something come out of nothing? is it possible to give, eat and be full of the nothing? is this the meaning of grace? and is this also the time of hospitality? ...later kuchela recalls that he had asked nothing, indeed he needs nothing... he is again blessed. (kalpana seshadri, “departures: hospitality as mediation” in richard kearney and james taylor, eds., hosting the stranger: between religions, p. 52). it might also be interesting to do a comparative analysis of the role of the goose as a sacred bird in other cultural-religious myths, for example, the “paramahamsa” in both buddhist and hindu scriptures, referring to the divinely enlightened sage. for kabir, the sihk-sufi-hindu poet, the hamsa or himalayan goose, was considered to be a wandering migrant soul who bore secret messages and we also find the goose-swan playing a key role in the rig veda story of puru ravas and his wife uruvasi. the goose that flies over mount kailash, and bathes in the lake of manasarova (the lake of the mind, manas) remained a recurring poetic theme. the gooseswan also plays a key role of 'transformation' in the popular story of nala and damayanti from the mahabharata as well as in the celtic and greek mythologies and popular folktales like grimm’s goose girl. i am indebted to my colleagues, francis clooney, jyoti sahi, joseph o’leary and kalpana seshedra for this and related information on buddhist and hindu narratives of hospitality. 13 i am indebted to emmanuel de saint aubert for bringing these passages to my attention, and especially those from merleau-ponty’s collège de france lecture notes of 1953, le monde sensible et le monde de l’expression (metispresses, geneva, 2011). in his “introduction,” 19 f, de saint aubert offers a very illuminating commentary on the importantance of ‘diacritical perception’ in the later work of merleau-ponty. see also here merleau-ponty’s essays on embodied language in signs (in particular ‘indirect language and the voices of silence’). i would also like to express deep gratitude here to my close colkearney journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 article 2 14 league and friend, kascha semonovitch, who first introduced me to the later course notes of merleau-ponty, especially those on ‘nature.’ 14 see our development of this play between prefiguration and refiguration in our poétique du possible (paris: beauchesne, 1984) and the god who may be (bloomington, ind.: indiana university press, 2001). see also paul ricoeur, time and narrative, vol. 1, chapter 3 (chicago: university of chicago press, 1986). 15 maurice merleau-ponty, phenomenology of perception (london: routledge, 2002), p. 246. one finds a moving poetic metaphor for this idea of sacramental sensing as transubstantiation in george’s herbert poem ‘love bade me welcome’ which concludes with the very carnal line: “you must sit down, says love, and taste my meat. so i did sit and eat.” see kascha semonovitch’s essay on this subject in ‘incarnate experience and keeping the soul ajar’, religion and the arts, vol. 14, no. 5, special issue: “hospitality: imagining the stranger”, ed. christopher yates (2010), pp. 515-690. see also the commentary on this poem as a phenomenology of the embodied stranger in our joint essay, ‘at the threshold: foreigners, strangers, others’, in richard kearney and kascha semonovitch, eds., phenomenologies of the stranger: between hostility and hospitality (new york: fordham university press, 2011), pp. 25-29. 16 merleau-ponty, ibid. for further elaborations of a phenomenology of flesh see the recent work of didier franck, renaud barabas, john manoussakis, anthony steinbock and jean-luc nancy (in particular corpus and noli me tangere: on the raising of the body, both fordham university press, 2008-2009). for a more feminist hermeneutics of embodiment, drawing from the continental movement of thought, see the seminal writings of luce irigaray and julia kristeva; and more recently the work of kelly oliver, karmen mckendrick, virginia burrus, judith butler and elizabeth grosz. there are interesting opportunities opening up here for dialogue between a hermeneutics of flesh and recent pioneering work on notions of embodied intelligence beyond the traditional sensation/cognition divide by thinkers like antonio damasio, evan thompson, george lakoff and mark johnson (see in particular lakoff and johnson, philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought, basic books, new york, 1999). 17 this idea of ‘hermeneutic application’ was originally formulated by hans-georg gadamer and later developed in an ethical direction by paul ricoeur and peter kemp (refiguration and attestation), in a political direction by gianni vattimo and santiago zabala (subversion and emancipation), in a religious direction by david tracy, kevin hart and merold westphal (fragmentation and community), in an eco-environmental direction by david wood, brian treanor and edward casey (earth works and borders) and in a therapeutic direction by james risser and nancy moules (healing, grief, and compassion). corresponding author: amie c liddle email: aemilio@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics february 27, 2017 the author(s) 2017 deconstructing the phenomenon of apology amie c liddle abstract within alberta health services, the alberta provincial patient relations department employs patient relations consultants (prcs) to assist unsatisfied patients, investigate healthcare related concerns, and facilitate resolution. the patients, who are referred to as complainants, interpret their experience and come forward with their complaint; the prc is responsible to then interpret the complaint and take it forward for redress. in doing so, offering complainants an apology is unavoidable. patient relations is an interpretive practice, however, and there are shortcomings when apology is inserted into the conversation. in this article, i deconstruct apology from a patient relations perspective. i draw upon concepts in richard kearney’s strangers, gods and monsters (2003), as well as the work of hans-georg gadamer and jacques derrida, to present an interpretive account of how the hospital is a host to strangers, and to patients. following an unsatisfactory experience or adverse event, the patients become complainants, or monsters. the prcs, who are also considered hosts, receive the monsters at their door and, in turn, they can become hostages to the monsters. in attempting to achieve “otherness” with the “monsters,” the phenomenon of apology is examined. keywords hermeneutics, deconstruction, gadamer, kearney, apology, patient complaints within alberta health services, the alberta provincial patient relations department employs patient relations consultants (prc) to assist unsatisfied patients, investigate healthcare related concerns, and facilitate resolution. in the process of managing concerns, the need for apology inevitably arises. in deconstructing apology in the context of patient complaints, i draw upon concepts in richard kearney’s strangers, gods and monsters (2003). one may think this is an odd selection since the phenomenon of apology that i am examining is in the context of liddle journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 3 2 healthcare; however, it is a particularly relevant text. in reading strangers, gods and monsters, i noticed that i was experiencing a dichotomous relationship with the content. i was not reading of strangers, gods or monsters; they were patients, hospitals, and complainants. i also draw upon the work of philosophers, hans-georg gadamer and jacques derrida, to present an interpretive account of how the hospital is a host to strangers, and to patients. following an unsatisfactory experience or adverse event, the patients become complainants, or monsters. the prcs, who are also considered hosts, receive the monsters at their door and, in turn, they can become hostages to the monsters. in attempting to achieve “otherness” with the “monsters,” i examine the phenomenon of apology. initial thoughts i consider my “truths” and understandings of the phenomenon of apology in the context of patient complaints. i admit, with the hesitation of insulting others, that i dislike the word and the notion of apology. in the past, i suppose that i viewed apology as a positive way to take accountability and repair relationships. however, my experiences with apology as a prc have left me with an alternate view of the word and the contexts in which it is used. as i assess the actions of my colleagues, tucked away in our cramped cubicle spaces, busy taking complaints like a call center, i am drawn to the sounds of apologies. i apologize, i am so sorry that this has happened to you, i would like to apologize, please accept my apology. we apologize, we are so sorry that this has happened to you, we would like to apologize, please accept our apology. i am disconcerted by the appearance that these apologies have as i watch my colleagues drawing the phones from their ears as complainants yell with vengeance. i observe consultants placing their heads on their desks or gazing out the window in a moment of solitude after each interaction. it is from these observations that i somehow have grown to dread the word apology or the very words, “i am sorry,” or “we are sorry.” in my opinion, apology from the perspective of a prc is much like that of an empty gesture or a campaign promise. if a prc was pressured into answering the question “are you truly sorry?,” i predict that the answer would undeniably be “no, i am not.” if we consider this plausible response, then who is really sorry and what is the meaning or purpose of the apology? in this paper, i deconstruct apology from a professional patient relations’ perspective. according to rolfe (2004), “deconstruction is the enemy of the authorized/authoritarian text, the text that tries to tell it like it is” (p. 275). it is not intended to undermine the power of apology within other contexts. deconstruction of a complex phenomenon such as apology is no easy feat, but an attempt to do so reveals the multiple meanings of this word. hospitality hospitals are places for individuals to seek medical attention for whatever may ail them. the word hospital is derived from old french meaning hospital, ospital, “hostel, shelter, lodging,” liddle journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 3 3 from late latin hospitale, “guest-house, inn,” noun use of neuter of latin adjective hospitalis “of a guest or host.” as such, a hospital by its historical meanings implies a place that is welcoming and hospitable. if a hospital is a hospitable space, then it has some connection with hospitality. interestingly, hostis is the latin root for both hospitality and hostile and can be used to identify both invitation and invasion (kearney, 2003). when patients arrive at the hospital, they are strangers at the door; they presume to be met hospitably. one would assume that this is, in fact, absolute hospitality, because no patient is ever turned away. absolute hospitality “requires one to give all one has to another without asking any questions, imposing any restrictions, or requiring any compensation” (westmoreland, 2008, p. 3). the hospital treats every being, from the wealthy business man arriving at the door with a heart attack to the wounded gang member left at the door, shot or stabbed. as kearney (2003) identified absolute hospitality is a ‘yes’ to the stranger that goes beyond the limits of legal conventions which demands checks and measures regarding who to include and exclude. it defies border controls. by putting in such a hyperbolic way, derrida bids us make a leap of faith toward the stranger as ‘tout autre’. a stranger always unknowable and unpredictable. a stranger of radical alterity. (p.174) the hospital is representative of a trusting place where caring nurses and doctors are prepared to address the needs of any stranger they encounter. society is also lead to believe that hospitals are safe and that we must trust healthcare providers. healthcare professionals are obligated by their professions to unconditionally respect all patients and their needs. “when there is a knock at the door, you don’t know whether the person is a monster or messiah” (kearney, 2015, p.174). essentially, the hospital represents absolute openness and caring of all strangers and it does not matter if they are sinner or saint. according to kearney (2015), respect for the individuality of each stranger is required for absolute hospitality to occur. “the master of the home, the host, must welcome the foreigner, a stranger, a guest, without any qualifications, including never have been given an invitation” (westmoreland, 2008, p. 4). absolute hospitality does not restrict the host to follow any particular laws or demands to permit the guest to enter. it is an unspoken, free, and open invitation without any boundaries. patient as the host unfortunately for some patients, hospital care does not meet their expectations; errors can be made when providing care to patients. the hospital, as a host, has not provided the hospitable services that were expected. according to westmoreland (2008), the risk of absolute hospitality is that it permits the possibility of violence. the act of being unconditionally welcoming or hospitable opens the door to violence. when an adverse event or unsatisfactory experience occurs, these can be considered acts of violence and, as such, absolute hospitality is disturbed. “interruptions. that which makes unconditional hospitality possible also allows for the impossibility of hospitality” (westmoreland, 2008, p. 6). liddle journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 3 4 as a result of adverse events or unsatisfactory experiences, patients are transformed; they may leave the hospital with altered bodies and emotions that cause them to become hostile. when this occurs, the patient is no longer a patient; he or she is now a complainant. the hospital is now held responsible for their physical and emotional injuries and, as such, is responsible to address the complainant’s concerns. complainants contact the department of patient relations to bring forth their interpretations of their healthcare experience. in this regard, the prcs can be viewed as another level of hospitality in the healthcare system that welcomes any stranger. it is understood that individuals contacting the department of patient relations are considered complainants, however, they are also strangers to prcs, as they have never met before. “the ethos of hospitality is never guaranteed. it is always shadowed by its twin hostility. in this sense, hosting others – aliens, foreigners, immigrants and refugees is an ongoing task; never a fait accompli” (kearney, 2015, p. 173). many complainants are only hoping to provide feedback related to their experiences. however, for others who have been harmed, they are angry, demanding apologies, and seeking personal justice. it is at this juncture that the prc is no longer a host, but a guest or hostage to the complainant. the wager of hospitality then becomes the wager of “hostipitality” (a coinage of derrida). we can’t talk about hospitality without the possibility of hostility and vice versa. in sum, host is a double term at the root of both hospitality and hostility. (kearney, 2015, p. 178) considering that host is a double term, it is important to recognize that even though a prc becomes a hostage on behalf of the healthcare organization of the complainant, there is an expectation that the consultant remain hospitable even in the face of hostility. “the host becomes the guest. likewise, the guest becomes the master of the home” (westmoreland, 2008, p. 6). “the host has welcomed into his home the very thing that can overturn his sovereignty. in welcoming the new arrival, the host has brought about that which takes him hostage” (westmoreland, 2008, p. 7). it is unknown which complainant will become the hostile hostage taker, and perhaps this unknown is the nature of welcoming strangers into complaint. according to westmoreland (2008), “in welcoming the other the host imposes certain conditions upon the guest” (p. 2). this would be considered conditional hospitality. i pose that complainants offer conditional hospitality. they do not, and cannot, offer absolute hospitality because they are unsatisfied and suspicious of the healthcare system. complainants are seeking answers to their questions and are making demands for a sense of self justice. complainants or monsters in a complaint conversation, i speculate that the angry patient now becomes the host, and prcs are the hostages. this relationship is contrary to the healthcare provider and patient relationship and begs the question: what have the patients become? the patients who have become angry complainants are now even more strange to healthcare professionals. “the disassociation of identity and presence and the concomitant juxtaposition with a new background are likely to occur whenever naming and identity labelling are involved” (gurevitch, 1988, p. 1192). liddle journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 3 5 through language, we can make others strangers. to call someone an angry complainant is not only implying fury; it also implies that the individual is not a patient anymore, and that he or she is no longer deserving of hospitality. not only does the label of complainant create a stranger, the language of complaint management is also a contributor. the three most common phrases documented in patient complaint files are: “the complainant alleges that…, the complainant remains unsatisfied despite all levels of the review process…, according to the complainant the care was unsatisfactory because…”. the tone and the choice of words documented by the prc is very formal and implies that the complainant is an outsider coming forth with a narrow and angry point of view. it could be further argued that, when an angry complainant comes forward, they are treated as less reliable historians of the complaint context and there is always an underlying questionability of how they may have contributed to their own situation. angry complainants evoke fear in the healthcare system with their demands, media threats, and unavoidable desire to seek revenge. as friedrich nietzsche stated “it is impossible to suffer without making someone pay for it; every complaint already contains revenge” (n.d.). we label threatening patients as complainants, and we fear the existence of complainants in the healthcare system. the complainants no longer resemble the patient in need of caring; they are fierce and strong like monsters seeking revenge. according to kearney (2003), we “attempt to simplify our existence by scapegoating others as ‘aliens’. in so doing we contrive to transmute the sacrificial alien into a monster” (p. 5). in healthcare, we do subconsciously reference angry and demanding complainants as monsters. for obvious reasons, we do not refer to them as monsters but the fear and anxiety that angry complainants provoke makes them the antithesis of what we deem a patient. according to kearney (2003), strangers, gods and monsters represent experiences of the extremity which bring us to the edge. they subvert our established categories and challenge us to think again, and because they threaten the known with the unknown, they are often set apart in fear and trembling. exiled to hell or heaven; or simply ostracized from the human community into the land of aliens. (p. 3) kearney (2003) suggested that monsters draw attention to how we perceive what is familiar and how we see the differences between same and other. monsters give us the choice to either try and understand what is strange to us or not to acknowledge or accept anything that is unfamiliar. according to kearney (2003), “we often project onto others those unconscious fears from which we recoil in ourselves” (p. 5). in healthcare, the complainants or monsters, are intimidating and rather than understand what is strange, it is common to dismiss or avoid the anger and conflict. “no matter how many times we demonize, divinize or simply kill off our monsters, they keep returning for more” (kearney, 2003, p. 34). this statement is elaborated upon by kearney referencing the work of timothy beal, and suggests that these monsters keep returning because they have something to say to us. “the key perhaps, is not to kill our monsters but to learn to live with them” (kearney, 2003, p. 62). i propose that this is why complainants return over and over again to the department of patient relations. angry complainants have something to say and it liddle journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 3 6 could be argued that we are not hearing or addressing the monster in right or just ways. the healthcare system is not making improvements to satisfy the complainants and, in turn, creating more monsters. myths of using monsters as scapegoats for things we fear is not limited to ancient times. in healthcare, we need to invite these monsters to tell us how we can be better and improve. scapegoating myths fail. a society can only pretend to believe in the lie because it is the same society that is lying to itself! hence the ultimately self-defeating nature of ideological persecution. this is born out of the need for constant renewal of the sacrificial act. the reliance on the alien-scapegoat never subsides at least not until such time we renounce our desire to always covert what the other has, and to accept one’s other as oneself. (kearney, 2003, p. 39) kearney (2003) wrote “for now what is needed, when confronted with extreme tendencies to demonize or defy monsters, is to look at our own psyches, and examine our own consciousness in the mirror of our own gods and monsters” (kearney, 2003, p. 43). “we refuse to recognize the stranger before us as a singular other who responds, in turn, to the singular otherness in each of us. we refuse to acknowledge ourselves as others” (kearney, 2003, p. 5). i offer that i, too, have been a monster, and would wager that we all have been, or will be, monsters in the context of healthcare. my 3-year-old daughter was ill and screaming in pain; by all accounts, her symptoms resembled that of appendicitis. as any parent would do, we went to the hospital. as i waited patiently for hours in the waiting room of the emergency department, i could feel my anger intensify. as feelings of frustration overwhelmed me, i approached the triage desk with a limp screaming child, i became a monster, demanding care. i was no longer satisfied with my host and lost the sense of absolute hospitality. in this situation, i felt a physical change, one that turned me into an aggressor. i moved from a stranger to monster, a complainant. i was not seeking hospitality at this point; i was demanding my position as the host. after the incident, i felt perplexed by the encounter. i am a prc and know the healthcare system, as well as the most effective ways to bring forth concerns. however, i was transformed and believed that i was righteous in my demands for healthcare services. otherness following an unsatisfactory experience or adverse event, the role of a prc is to engage in conversation and to understand the complaint. gill (2015) suggested that “(t)he first condition of hermeneutics is an encounter with otherness. an encounter brings our attention to something alien which, in turn, makes us become acutely aware of the situation less of our understanding and knowing” (p.15). when we attempt to understand something, we need to be prepared for it to tell us something new; however, this involves “an acceptance that the other person in his/her perceptive count in the dialogic deliberation” (p. 15). according to gill (2015), gadamer asserted that “openness to otherness calls for one’s capacity to attend to and listen to what addresses us in conversation” (p.15). liddle journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 3 7 the complainants interpret their experience and come forward with their complaint; the prc is responsible to then interpret the complaint and take it forward for redress. in doing so, offering complainants an apology is unavoidable. patient relations is an interpretive practice, however, and there are shortcomings when apology is inserted into the conversation with an angry complainant, a monster. the word “apology” is actually an etymological fallacy (sihler, 2000). apology is derived from the greek, ἀπολογία, apologia, with the prefix apo-, meaning “away or off” and combined with logos, or “speech.” the original meaning of apologize was “a speech in defense.” over time, the meaning had shifted as a self-justification to an expression of regret or remorse, “i am sorry,” which most often includes an explanation or justification. the literature in this area explicitly states that patients expect apologies and that apology in healthcare is necessary to redress complaints and acknowledge wrong doing (carmack, 2010; howley, 2009; robson & pelletier, 2008). lazare (2004) offered the following. one of the most profound human interactions is the offering and accepting of apologies. apologies have the power to heal humiliations and grudges, remove the desire for vengeance, and generate forgiveness on the part of the offended parties. for the offender they can diminish the fear of retaliation and relieve the guilt and shame that can grip the mind with a persistence and tenacity that are hard to ignore. the result of that apology process, ideally, is the reconciliation and restoration of broken relationships. (p. 1) considering this statement, apology, one simple gesture, appears to be both modest and powerful. however, apologizing in the healthcare discipline is not that simple. difficultly arises because healthcare providers must consider the litigious nature of the complaints. in alberta, the provincial legislature passed the “apology act,” which was an amendment to the existing alberta evidence act, r.s.a. 2000, c. a-18 (apology act, 2015). this statute was instituted to protect the actual act of apologizing from legal liability, and does not constitute an implied admission of guilt or fault. i pose the argument that, in the very act of placing protection around apology, a part of the intended meaning is stripped away. apology is no longer genuine and placed in the hands of the prc to deliver. to offer apologies, prcs are expected to achieve otherness. however, i argue that otherness cannot be achieved with monsters for two reasons: if prcs are managing thousands of complaints per year, how can otherness be achieved in every conversation and, further to this, how is apology authentic? the other reason is that otherness cannot be achieved with a monster because the monster does not hold an openness to apology and is therefore provoking the prc to offer a defensive apology. absence of openness the prc may very well be interested in what the complainant has to say, but is the information new or just “more of the same?” considering the multiplicity of complaints, i propose that there is no space for openness when the consultant is preparing for the opportunity to apologize and http://www.emotionalcompetency.com/humiliation.htm http://www.emotionalcompetency.com/anger.htm http://www.emotionalcompetency.com/revenge.htm http://www.emotionalcompetency.com/forgiveness.htm http://www.emotionalcompetency.com/fear.htm http://www.emotionalcompetency.com/guilt.htm http://www.emotionalcompetency.com/shame.htm http://www.emotionalcompetency.com/relationships.htm liddle journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 3 8 move on to the next concern that is in queue. the openness to work with the individual is lost when we only offer apologies because we believe that is what he or she wants to hear. gill (2015) suggested that, hermeneutical endeavour would be undermined if the interpreter were to concentrate on the other person, rather than on the subject matter. gadamer clarifies that it is not merely a matter of looking at the other person, but looking with the other at the thing that the dialogue partners communicate about. (p. 20) considering that prcs are offering an apology on behalf of another, are we really sorry? an apology should be both genuine and thoughtful. if prcs are consistently apologizing, one would assume that they are really not sorry; considering there are in excess of 9,000 complaints per year, there would be too much to be truly sorry for. the openness required for 9,000 conversations would be extremely difficult, even impossible, for any human being. defensive apology when a prc is presented with the monster who is angry and abusive, it begs the question, is the consultant now in defense mode? similarly, is the monster allowing the openness to receive an apology. “otherness and our openness to the other are absolute prerequisites for dialogic understanding to take place” (gill, 2015, p.16). apology is offered, but in a defense, and well beyond the context of otherness. early christian scholars identify that “apology,” in its original sense, was a function of “apologetics,” which was the discipline of defending a religious position (sihler, 2000). the term is still utilized today in politics and religion. in the political realm, apologetics is viewed as negative and is used to describe the defense of contentious actions or policies. according to apologetics, apologies are posed by an “apologist.” an apologist is an individual who provides justification for a belief. in being held hostage to the monsters, apology is used in its original sense, as the manner of defense for the organization. apology moves from the “i am sorry,” to the “we are sorry.” “we” identifies the system, and the authority of the hospital. this is a symbol of authority and removes the responsibility from the prc. there is no possibility for openness at this point on behalf of the consultant. the ethical considerations of hospitality require that sometimes you have to say “no”. we are often obligated to discern and discriminate; and so doing, one generally has to invoke certain criteria to determine whether the person coming in your home is going to destroy you and your loved ones or is going to enter in a way that, where is possible, is mutually enhancing. one never knows for sure, of course, what the outcome will be. it is always a risk. to cite derrida once more, the stranger who arrives into your home could be a murderer or a messiah. or sometimes, a bit of both. (kearney, 2015, p.177) liddle journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 3 9 the prc represents the healthcare organization, and, as such, the apologies offered and conversations held with complainants can be viewed as defensive strategies put forth by the organization. in other words, the role of the prc is that of an apologist. concluding thoughts in healthcare, we will always encounter “monsters;” however, we need to understand these monsters to establish otherness and make change. kearney (2003) suggested that if we are to engage properly with the human obsession with strangers and enemies – is a critical hermeneutic capable of addressing the dialect of others and aliens. such a hermeneutic would have the task of soliciting ethical decisions without rushing to judgement that is, without succumbing to overhasty acts of binary exclusion. (p. 67) i do not believe that, in healthcare, we are apologizing well; i propose that our apologies lack a sense of justice for others. i conclude that, as prcs, we are apologizing according to its original intent: as apologists and, in this position of defense, we are obliterating the possibility of openness. references apology act. (2015). alberta evidence act, r.s.a. 2000, c. a-18. alberta queens printer. retrieved from http://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/acts/a18.pdf carmack, h.j. (2010). structuring and disciplining apology: a structurational analysis of health care benevolence laws. qualitative research reports in communication, 11(1), 6-13. doi: 10.1080/17459430903413432 gill, s. (2015). “holding oneself open in a conversation”: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics and the ethics of dialogue. journal of dialogue studies, 3(1), 9-28. retrieved from http://www.ghfp.org/portals/ghfp/documents/scherto_gill2015_jds_dialogue%20ethics.pdf gurevitch, z.d. (1988). the other side of dialogue: on making the other strange and the experience of otherness. american journal of sociology, 93(5), 1179-1199. retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780369 howley, m.j. (2009). the use of apology in health care. journal of medical marketing: device, diagnostic and pharmaceutical marketing, 9(4), 279-289. doi: 10.1057/jmm.2009.30 kearney, r. (2003). strangers, gods and monsters: interpreting otherness. new york, ny: routledge. kearney, r. (2015). hospitality: possible or impossible. hospitality & society, 5(2-3), 173-184. retrieved from: https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/10.1386/hosp.5.2-3.173_1 http://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/acts/a18.pdf http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780369 https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/10.1386/hosp.5.2-3.173_1 liddle journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 3 10 lazare, a. (2004). on apology. new york, ny: oxford university press. moules, n.j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes. an ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods, 1(3), 1-40. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1880/46345 nietzsche, f. (n.d.). retrieved from http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/f/friedrichn395165 robson, r., & pelletier, e. (2008). giving back the pen: disclosure, apology and early compensation discussions after harm in the healthcare setting. healthcare quarterly, 11(sp), 8590. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2008.19655 rolfe, g. (2004). deconstruction in a nutshell. nursing philosophy, 5(3), 274-276. doi:10.1111/j.1466-769x.2004.00179.x sihler, a.l. (2000). language history: an introduction. amsterdam/philadelphia, pa: john benjamins. westmoreland, m.w. (2008). interruptions: derrida and hospitality. kritike, 2(1), 1-10. doi: 10.3860/krit.v2i1.566 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/46345 http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/f/friedrichn395165 corresponding author: kari latvanen university of helsinki email: punnittusana@ gmail.com journal of applied hermeneutics july 29, 2016 the author(s) 2016 the symbolism of evil in the big book of aa kari latvanen abstract alcoholics anonymous (aa) describes itself as a “fellowship of men and women who share their experience, strength and hope with each other that they may solve their common problem and help others to recover from alcoholism” (alcoholics anonymous, 2010). the fellowship has millions of members all around the world and the number of independent aa groups is counted in tens of thousands. in this article, i try to understand the recovery from alcoholism in the fellowship of aa as a meaning giving process where the alcoholic is invited to interpret the founding text of aa, a lcoholics anonymous: the story of how more than one hundred men have recovered from alcoholism, and to appropriate the world that it opens in front of him. i focus on interpreting the symbolic language with which the big book of aa speaks of evil. i also explain how this symbolic language is related to recovery – i.e., how the alcoholic may find in the pages of the big book commonly shared symbols of stain, sin, and guilt which express his blind experience of evil. keywords hermeneutics, paul ricoeur, symbolism, evil, alcoholics anonymous, recovery alcoholics anonymous (aa) is best described as both a fellowship of alcoholics and a program of recovery from alcoholism (kurtz, 1979). as a social organization, aa exists in and through local meetings and the interpersonal relationships between members. it charges no dues or fees from members, and keeps no membership lists. the only membership requirement is a desire to stop drinking. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 2 aa’s program for recovery is outlined in the famous twelve steps and it is basically a set of spiritual concepts and practices that have the purpose not of curing alcoholism, but of transforming the alcoholic. aa sees alcoholism as an incurable and progressive disease of the body, mind, and spirit, but the fellowship and program focus mainly on the spiritual aspect. the fellowship's understanding of alcoholism and recovery was first put to words in a coherent manner in a book titled a lcoholics anonymous – the story of how more than one hundred men have recovered from alcoholism (1939). the book is also known as the “big book of aa” and it is the basic text of aa in that it gives an account of the experiences of the original members of the fellowship concerning alcoholism and recovery. in the book, the founders try to interpret their experiences, put them into words, and thus make them understandable for themselves and their readers. the purpose of the book is presented in the first lines of the foreword to its first edition as follows: we, of alcoholics anonymous, are more than one hundred men a nd women who have recovered from a seemingly hopeless state of mind and body. to show other alcoholics precisely how we have recovered is the main purpose of this book. for them, we hope these pages will prove so convincing that no further authentication will be necessary. (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. vii) the big book has been read and used by millions of alcoholics since its publication. it is usually the first piece of literature a newcomer is given. also, the text itself and other texts that focus on interpreting and clarifying the ideas presented in the big book are regularly read in aa meetings. the big book sets a kind of a standard for “good recovery” (mercadante, 1996, p. 12). in this article, i try to support the claim that recovery in aa is, in a very significant way, a hermeneutical process of meaning giving. it starts with the first step of the recovery program where the alcoholic admits to being powerless over alcohol, that is, interprets his or her situation according to the meaning of the step. then, as s/he proceeds in the program, the alcoholic learns to see his or her situation in regard with alcohol, himself or herself, other people and god in a new light. the big book supports this process by inviting the reader to interpret its te xt and to appropriate the world that it opens in front of the reader. the text uses various discursive procedures such as symbols, metaphors, and narration to show the world in a new light. o ne can even say that the text forces its reader to a hermeneutica l process of interpretation, because metaphors and symbols, for example, are such structures of signification that can be understood only in and through interpretation. i will support my claim using the conceptual and interpretive tools provided by paul r icoeur's theory of interpretation (ricoeur, 1976, 1981). ricoeur's theory of interpretation can help us understand recovery in aa for several reasons. firstly, ricoeur's theory helps us understand what interpretation is – and it does this in a way that is fruitful when we try to understand what role the big book plays in recovery. secondly, the theory shows how figurative language is used in order to create new meanings. thirdly, it gives us means for interpreting this figurative language. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 3 i will demonstrate my claim by interpreting the symbolic language with which the big book of aa speaks of evil. o ne part of recovery has to do with dealing with the evil suffered and done by the alcoholic. the question concerning the alcoholic's guilt and responsibility has to be resolved by positing and articulating evil so that s/he can relate to it and its role in the world and in him or her. i will show how the alcoholic learns to see his or her obsession as a symptom of a spiritual malady, of pride, arrogance, and hubris through interpreting the symbolically rich text of the big book. this symbolism of evil gives meaning to the alcoholic's experience of evil. in addition, one can even claim that the symbolism of evil of the big book has a certain liberating power. the big book shows the world in a new light according to paul ricoeur, when discourse is fixed by writing, something important occurs in regard with the reference of the discourse (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 34-37, 94; ricoeur, 1981, p. 215). in spoken discourse, the interlocutors can anchor the discourse to the surrounding reality by for example ostensive indicators and definite descriptions. but the final referent of a text is, in ricoeur's words, “non-ostensive.” in a text, discourse exceeds the mere ostensive designation of the situation common to the interlocutors in the dialogical situation. the text does not point to the concrete world but to a world of its own. the text speaks about a possible world and about different ways to orient within that world. it re fers to different world-propositions and discloses a new way of being. the text constructs a world of its own and in doing so it also shows reality in a new light. ricoeur says that the text represents the world in a way that is not a mere shadow image of reality (pellauer, 2007, p. 69; ricoeur, 1976, pp. 40-41). he speaks of the text's way of representation as ”iconic augmentation” and uses the invention of oil painting by dutch painters as an analogy to describe what he means. o il painting enhances the contrasts, gives colors back their resonance and lets the luminosity within which things shine appear. it gave the painters a new optic alphabet with which they could write a new text of reality. painting for the dutch masters was neither the production nor the reproduction of the world but its metamorphosis. in ricoeur's words, “the inscription of discourse is the transcription of the world, and transcription is not reduplication, but metamorphosis” (ricoeur, 1976, p. 42). the idea of iconic augmentation points to how this metamorphosis is achieved by enhancing certain features of the universe so that the world can be seen in a new light (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 41 -42). iconicity means the revelation of a real more real than ordinary reality. iconicity is the re-writing of the world and writing is a particular case of iconicity. texts metamorphose or re-write the world by using various discursive procedures such as metaphors, symbols, and narration. metaphor, for example, is a deviant usage of predicates in the framework of the sentence as a whole (ricoeur, 1976, p. 50). a metaphorical statement invites us to make an interpretation where we see something as (ricoeur, 2008, pp. 168-169), e.g., alcoholism as an illness. symbols, in turn, are structures of signification in which a literal meaning designates another meaning which is figurative and which can be apprehended only latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 4 through the first (ricoeur, 1974, pp. 12-13; ricoeur, 1976, pp. 53-54). symbols, too, show us something as. in religious language, for example, the word “stain” is sometimes used to describe a situation where someone's relationship with the sacred is in some way “stained” (ricoeur, 1969, p. 15). as said, a text constructs a world of its own. the reader's task is then to open that world. according to ricoeur, the meaning of the discourse fixed by writing has to be actualized in reading (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 91-92). in understanding the text, we “follow its movement from sense to reference: from what it says, to what it talks about” (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 87-88). the final object of interpretation is the world that the text opens in front of itself. what must be interpreted in a text is “a proposed world that i could inhabit and wherein i could project one of my own most possibilities” (ricoeur, 2008, p. 83). we can now state that aa's big book is a text that constructs a world of its own by using various discursive procedures. the big book portrays a unique conception of what alcoholism and recovery are. in order to understand what the big book says and what it talks about when it talks about alcoholism and recovery, we, as readers, have to answer the challenge that the text sets to us. we need to open the world of the big book by trying to “follow the path of thought opened up by the text” and place ourselves “en route towards the orient of the text” (ricoeur, 1981, p. 162). this need for interpretation applies for every reader of the text. in this sense, every reader of the big book takes part in a process of interpreting the text which is similar to t he one that a recovering alcoholic goes through. even if we are not alcoholics we can, after interpreting the text, say: “i understand what it means to be in the world in the manner presented here” (k lemm, 1983, p. 144). but the recovering alcoholic in aa, may go a bit further and aim to appropriate the world of the big book. in appropriation, an imagined possible mode of being is made actual. that is to say, the recovering alcoholic may recognize the world of the text of the big book as his or her own and become what s/he truly is through that recognition (klemm, 1983, p. 144). interpreting the symbolism of evil sin, lack of moral sense, behavior disorder, illness, mental illness – these are some conceptions in which alcoholism has been understood in the course of history (e.g., fingarette, 1989; kurtz, 2008, pp. 91-108; mercadante, 1996; stolberg, 2006; tiebout 1999, pp. 5-12; vaillant 1983, pp. 15-44; white, 1998, 2000). they all include in somewhat unspecified ways the idea that the alcoholic is abnormal, deviant, sick – or even evil. not surprisingly, then, also the alcoholic may experience feelings of shame, worthlessness, guilt, or even fear and dread. a significant part of recovery has to do with the way evil is posited in regard with alcoholism and the alcoholic. is the alcoholic, for example, an innocent victim of a disease or is s/he to be held responsible for the condition? the question concerning the alcoholic's guilt and responsibility has to be resolved by positing and articulating evil so that s/he can relate to it and its role in the world and in him or her. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 5 i will next try to interpret how the big book of aa gives meaning to the problem of evil associated with alcoholism. in the interpretation, i will apply paul ricoeur's analysis of the symbols of evil – stain, sin, and guilt – that are commonly shared in the western world. ricoeur presented his analysis in the book the symbolism of evil (1969). ricoeur argues that evil becomes evil only when the possibility of confessing it arises to human consciousness (ricoeur, 1974, p. 289; simms, 2003, p. 21). evil is always acknowledged and confessed through language. in fact, there is no direct, non-symbolic language of evil undergone, suffered, or committed. whether a man1 admits his responsibility or claims to be the prey of the evil taking hold of him, he does so first and foremost in a symbolism of evil. evil is known through its symbols, because such symbols – e.g., stain, sin, and guilt – provide the material out of which confession is to be constructed. for ricoeur, a symbol is “any structure of signification in which a direct, primary, literal meaning designates, in addition, another meaning which is indirect, secondary and figurative and which can be apprehended only through the first” (ricouer, 1974, pp. 12-13). symbols are, in a sense, two-dimensional; they have a linguistic or semantic side and a non-semantic side. in relation with the linguistic side of the symbol, we can talk about doublemeaning or first order meaning and second order meaning (ricoeur, 1969, p. 15; ricoeur, 1974, pp. 12-13; ricoeur, 1976, pp. 53-54). in addition to the primary, direct or literal meaning, there is a secondary meaning that is hidden and can be understood only through the first meaning. the primary meaning produces the secondary meaning, as the meaning of the meaning. interpretation of a symbol is the work of thought that consist in deciphering the hidden meaning in the apparent meaning, in unfolding the levels of meaning implied by the literal meaning. for example, the word “stain” means primarily “defilement” or “unclean” etc. (ricoeur, 1969, p. 15). but symbolically this literal and manifest sense points beyond itself to something that is like a stain or a spot. the non-semantic side of the symbol has to do with the fact that the linguistic element of the symbol points always to something nonlinguistic (ricoeur, 1974, p. 289; ricoeur, 1976, p. 54). psychoanalysis, for example, connects its symbols to hidden psychic conflicts and the history of religion sees in symbols a milieu of the manifestations of the sacred (ricoeur, 1976, p. 54 ). in religious language, for example, “stain” might point to someone whose situation in regard with the sacred is in some ways defiled or unclean. symbols demand to be interpreted. because they are equivocal, symbols and the structures of signification that are associated with them work only when their structure has been explicated. for any symbolism to work, a minimal hermeneutics is required (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 62-63). 1 in the following sections where i read paul ricoeur's texts and the text of the big book i will use the gender-specific pronoun “man” in order to be faithful to the original texts. aa's big book, for example, refers to alcoholics as “men” even though it acknowledges that women, too, can be alcoholics. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 6 stain according to ricoeur, the language of confession is counterpart of the experience it brings to light (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 7-8). since the experience of evil is complex, the language in which it is expressed is also complex. ricoeur finds in the symbolism of evil three layers that intertwine with each other but can still be analytically separated according to how they posit evil in respect with the subject of this experience. the first, most archaic layer of the experience of evil is spoken of in the language of “stain” or “defilement” (pellauer, 2007, p. 36; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 25-26). ricoeur defines defilement as “an act that evolves an evil, an impurity, a fluid, a mysterious and harmful something that acts dynamically – that is to say magically” (ricoeur, 1969, p. 25). the idea of defilement includes the notion of a stain or blemish that infects from without. defilement is not a stain, but like a stain. it is a symbolic stain. it is an idea of a quasimaterial something that is harmful through its invisible properties and works in the manner of a force in the field of our undivided psychic and corporeal existence. the symbolism of stain is archaic and narrow in the sense that, at this stage, evil and misfortune are still quite the same (ricoeur, 1969, p. 27). evil and misfortune, doing ill and faring ill – suffering, sickness, death, failure are not yet distinguished from eac h other. all possible sufferings, all diseases, all death, all failure are transformed into a sign of defilement. this misfortune and suffering is interpreted as a punishment or a revenge (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 2930, 41). suffering is a punishment for the violation of an interdict or order. suffering is the price that has to be paid for the violation, to “satisfy” the claim of purity for revenge. this primordial idea of defilement connected to supernatural vengeance is felt subjectively as primitive dread. “man enters into the ethical world through fear and not through love” (ricoeur, 1969, p. 30), as ricoeur puts it. also, this dread is something more than fear of death or suffering. it is existential dread, or dread in the face of a threat which aims at a diminution of existence, a loss of the personal core of one's being. the dread associated with defilement is difficult to put into words, but it still needs to be expressed. defilement enters into the universe of man through speech, or the word, its anguish is communicated through speech. also, the opposition of the pure and the impure is spoken. “a stain is a stain because it is there, mute; the impure is taught in the words that institute the taboo,” says ricoeur (ricoeur, 1969, p. 36). the opposition of the pure and the impure raises the question of purification (ricoeur, 1969, p. 35). defilement is a symbol of evil, so it has to be dealt with symbolically. the ablution is a symbolic washing of the stain. but it is not produced in any total and direct action, it is always signified in partial, substituted and abbreviated signs. we speak of burning, removing, chasing, throwing, spitting out, covering up, and burying the evil. these are symbolic acts that stand for a total action addressed to the person taken as an undivided whole. the opposition between the pure and the impure is also social in nature (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 36, 39). a man is defiled in the sight of certain men and in the language of certain men. those who latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 7 have violated the order are removed from contact with their fellow citizens and excluded from public and sacred spaces. i noted previously that the dread and the opposition between the pure and the impure need to be expressed in words. ricoeur says that this dread also makes the defiled person conscious of himself (ricoeur, 1969, p. 41). consciousness discovers the unlimited perspective of selfinterrogation. man starts to ask questions like: “what sin have i committed in order to experience this failure, sickness or misfortune?” the meaning of the stain needs to be acknowledged and confessed. even though the confession of the stain is partly magical in nature, and a symbolic washing, the dread put into words also has an ethical quality (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 41-42). it is not only and simply a cry; it is also an avowal. as such, it involves a demand for a just punishment. man wants a just retribution. if a man sins and is punished, we really think he should be punished as he has sinned. retribution and punishment, when just, also bring back order (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 43-44). and true punishment is that which restores order and through this produces happiness. to suffer punishment and pay the penalty for one's faults is the only way to be happy. what is aimed at in vengeance and punishment is expiation. punishment is given in order to take away defilement. order is affirmed both outside of the guilty person and within him too. vengeance and expiation aim at amendment, the restoration of the personal worth o f the guilty person through just punishment. stain in the big book in the text of the big book of aa one can find a layer where alcohol and alcoholism are spoken of as magical powers that infect the alcoholic from without. recovery is said to start when the alcoholic admits to being “powerless over alcohol” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 71). the alcoholic feels he is ill in a mystical way that is inexplicable to himself, those near to him and even to the doctors that are treating him (alcoholics anonymo us, 1939, pp. 6, 17, 3, 37, 42). the big book presents alcohol as a substance that has the properties of a magical evil force. first, the alcoholic is absolutely powerless and defenseless against the first drink (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 24, 43). he feels that alcohol has taken his will power away in some obscure way: “o ur human resources as marshalled by the will, were not sufficient; they failed utterly. lack of power, that was our dilemma” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 57). second, alcohol as a power is almost a demonic “cunning, baffling, powerful” force (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 70-71). chapter 11 has a telling description of the alcoholic’s experience of this power: “as we became subjects of k ing alcohol, shivering denizens of his mad realm, the chilling vapor that is loneliness settled down” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 165). one of the founders of aa, bill, recalls the experience of this force in the following words: “i had met my match. i had been overwhelmed. alcohol was my master” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 17). latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 8 the powerlessness that the alcoholic feels when confronted by the demonic power of alcohol evokes an indescribable dread in him. bill again: “no words can describe the loneliness and despair i found in that bitter morass of self-pity” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 8). moreover, this dread gets even apocalyptic tones in the big book: “...then would come oblivion and the awful awakening to face the hideous four horsemen terror, bewilderment, frustration, despair” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 165). the similarities between a stain that inflicts a material substance, a disease inflicted in a human being and symbolical defilement are also noteworthy here. the big book portrays alcoholism as a disease that is a kind of curse inflicted upon the alcoholic. the other founder of aa, dr. bob, for example, speaks of recovery as release from a curse: “it is a most wonderful blessing to be relieved of the terrible curse with which i was afflicted” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 192). also, this curse is seen to be some kind of a punishment: “to be doomed to an alcoholic death or to live on a spiritual basis are not always easy alternatives to face” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 56; italics mine). i noted earlier that the opposition between the pure and impure is communicated through words. the big book makes a clear distinction between those drinkers who are true alcoholics and those who are not. the true alcoholic is someone who cannot take even o ne drink without grave, often fatal, consequences: “...once he takes any alcohol whatever into his system, something happens, both in the bodily and mental sense, which makes it virtually impossible for him to stop” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 33). alcohol is portrayed as a kind of taboo and the line is crystal clear: “these allergic types can never safely use alcohol in any form at all” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 4). the opposition between the pure and the impure is also social in nature and, not surprisingly, alcoholics evoke strong feelings of disgust and hatred in their fellow men. the alcoholic is maybe not totally excluded from the community, but he is bound to withdraw from social interaction gradually: “the less people tolerated us, the more we withdrew from society, from life itself” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 165). in the last stages of this social exclusion the alcoholic is shut out of all normal social interaction and lives in “health resorts, sanitariums, hospitals and jails” (alco holics anonymous, 1939, p. 120) if he manages to avoid the lonely destiny of an alcoholic death. so, the condition of the alcoholic is in part spoken of in the symbolic language of defilement. this language also applies for recovery. for example, as the alcoholic is confronted by the demonic power of alcohol, it is logical that he should turn to an even higher power, that is, god, in his need for help. the big book states that the alcoholic is beyond human help and that “his defense must come from a higher power” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 55). now, the obverse of the symbols of stain and defilement are such symbols as ablution and purification. in the big book recovery is spoken of symbolically in these terms. for example, in order to recover the a lcoholic has to “clean house,” that is, confess his wrongdoings, ask for forgiveness, and repair the damage done (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 95, 111). god is asked in the sixth step of the recovery program to “remove from us all the things which we ha ve admitted are objectionable” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 76). also, “the alcoholic problem” latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 9 is something that will, during the recovery process, be “removed” or “taken away” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 69). i noted earlier that punishment aims at restoring order and taking away defilement. in the light of this it is natural that the recovery program includes steps for restoring order such as the amendments of the steps eight and nine. the big book also makes an explicit connection between the restoration of the outer order with that of the inner state of the recovering alcoholic. his personal worth, selfesteem and social standing are restored as he goes on with his “housecleaning”: “we are going to know a new freedom and a new happiness. (…) we w ill comprehend the word serenity and will know peace. (…) that feeling of uselessness and selfpity will disappear” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 96). sin according to paul ricoeur, there is a divergence in meaning between defilement and sin, and this confusion is inscribed in the reality of the feelings and representations of evil (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 47-50). the representations of sin and defilement contaminate one another sometimes to the point of becoming indistinguishable. for example, the assault o f demonic forces is often experienced as the counterpart of the absence of the god. in any case, the category that determines the usage of the notion of “sin” is that of “before” god. sin is also a dimension of the penitent's existence which opens up new possibilities for the examination of conscience and the interrogative thinking that goes with it. sin is foremost a fault before the eyes of god (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 50–51). this implies the idea of an anthropotropic god, a god who is essentially turned toward man. man finds himself implicated in the initiative taken by someone who is concerned about him. the experience of sin is found in a dialogical relationship, in the exchange between vocation and invocation (pellauer, 2007, pp. 36-37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 50-52). the situation is centered in the word, in an utterance of god and an utterance of man. sin is a violation of the covenant, of a personal bond. the holy will is expressed in laws, commandments and other utterances and the “knowledge” of sin is in proportion to these utterances. the demand that god addresses to human beings is an infinite one and this creates an unfathomable distance and distress between god and man (pellauer, 2007, pp. 36 -37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 55-56, 59). the consciousness of s in is also intensified by a tension between attempting to obey specific, finite commandments, and this infinite demand. the law expounds on how a person may be a sinner (through idolatry, filial disrespect, etc.), not that he or she already is one. this introduces a new tone to the feeling of the experience of evil, one of anxiety rather than terror or dread. this sense of anxiety is further intensified with the symbol of (a day of) judgment. sin is a violation of the bond between man and god (pellauer, 2007, pp. 36-37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 69, 72). man does not listen and he revolts; god is jealous and angry. man is filled with pride and arrogance even though god is omnipotent. god gives the law that man breaks. sin is a loss of a personal or communal relationship, but the idea of a broken relationship also includes the possibility of repairing that relationship, the possibility of redemption, pardon, and return. a latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 10 broken bond is still a relation and, in the movement of invocation, the sinner becomes fully the subject of sin. sin also includes negative notions of missing the mark, rebellion, deviation, straying from the path, and even being abandoned by god (pellauer, 2007, pp. 36-37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 79-81). the counterpoint of these is the possibility of seeking god, returning and being pardoned. but sin is not solely negative but also something positive (pellauer, 2007, p. 37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 81-86). sin is experienced as something real. sin is something within the absolute sight of god and the consciousness of sin raises a need in the sinner to see the truth of his situation, to see the situation as seen by god. this seeing gives rise to self-awareness, to the question of the meaning of acts and motives. as such, sin is something that people can repent. as a positive force sin is also something “in which” man is caught (pellauer, 2007, p. 37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 87-93). evil is something that captivates, binds, and possesses. the obverse of these symbols is liberation. the man held by sin is a man to be delivered, saved, bought back. sin in the big book in the big book, alcoholism is portrayed as an inexplicable and fatal illness that inflects its victim in a magical way. from the viewpoint of the symbolism of evil it is interesting to see how the text connects the idea of a curselike illness to the notion of sin. the big book presents the alcoholic’s drinking as a sign of deeper problems. the movement from stain to sin starts with the following words: “o ur liquor was but a symptom. so we had to get down to causes and conditions” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 76). what are these “causes and conditions?” the text says that the alcoholic's failure is caused by “self, manifested in various ways” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 76). the alcoholic is selfcentered and this egocentrism manifests itself commonly in such “character defects” as resentment, anger, selfishness, dishonesty, and fear. this self-centeredness is sin because it blocks the alcoholic off from god. i noted earlier that sin is foremost a violation of a personal bond. the big book says that the alcoholic in his pride and arrogance puts himself in the place of god: “first of all, we had to quit playing god” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 75). the alcoholic's drinking is a symptom of egocentrism, of arrogant disregard of god's will. a counterpoint, and as such, a condition for recovery, is humility before god. the recovery program suggests (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 71-72) that the alcoholic should turn his will and his life over to the care of god (step 3). he is also advised to humbly ask god to remove his shortcomings (step 7). moreover, he should seek through prayer and meditation to improve his conscious contact with god and pray for knowledge of his will for him and the power to carry that out (step 11). interestingly, the big book suggests that it is god's will that the alcoholic should follow the recovery program. the text says that god can and will relieve the alcoholic of his illness if sought. how one can find god is, according to the authors, the main object of the big book and the recovery program (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 57). also, those who do not recover are latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 11 “people who cannot completely give themselves to this simple program” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 70). the implication is clear. god wants to relieve the alcoholic if he follows the “god-given program” (kurtz, 1979, p. 187). whereas ideas of pride and arrogance point to something active and thus powerful, the alcoholics of the big book also speak of experiences of being lost and having gone astray. these symbols envisage a total situation, a state of being astray or lost, a state of alienation or dereliction (ricoeur, 1969, p. 73). the authors of the big book speak of their experience of the illness in similar terms. with the first step, the alcoholic admits to be powerless over alcohol and that his life has become unmanageable (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 71). he has lost “all the things worth while in life” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 28) and lives only to drink. correspondingly, recovery means taking steps in a new direction, trudging “the road of happy destiny” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 179). recovery is rediscovering life by seeking god (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 167). i noted earlier that sin is also something in which man is caught, something that binds. the idea of sin as a binding force is clearly expressed in the so called third-step prayer where the notion of sin as self-centeredness is combined with the idea of someone captive o f sin: “god, i offer myself to thee – to build with me and to do with me as thou wilt. relieve me of the bondage of self, that i may better do thy will” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 75, italics mine). the symbolism of delivery is thus strongly related to recovery in the big book. in the strategically significant “three pertinent ideas” recovery is expressly spoken of as relief. god will relieve alcoholism if sought (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 72). the symbols of stain and sin diverge in an interesting way when the big book speaks of recovery. recovery from the alcoholic illness is seen as a removing, rooting or taking away of sins or shortcomings but also as relief from the bondage of self and taking steps on a path towards a new vision and way of life. guilt according to paul ricoeur, “guilt” refers to a radically individualized and interiorized experience of the unworthiness at the core of one's personal being (ricoeur, 1969, p. 7). whereas “stain” and “sin” are objective in a way, guilt is the subjective awareness of the guilty man of his situation (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 100-101). the guilty consciousness confesses its guiltiness in a personal, internalized way (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 101-107). personal guilt arises the “i” that accuses itself by asking: “what is it that i have done?” the guilty consciousness feels the burden of evil and becomes the measure of evil. guilt also has degrees. while sin is a qualitative situation – it is or it is not – guilt designates an intensive quantity, capable of more and less. while a man is radically and entirely a sinner, he is more or less guilty. within a scale of offences, a scale of penalties is conceivable, too (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 108 -118). the metaphor of the tribunal is connected with the registers of the consciousness of guilt. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 12 questions about which law has been broken and the true responsibility of the offender arise. the degree of guilt and the corresponding penalties are taken into consideration. a guilty consciousness can also be a delicate and scrupulous consciousness (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 118-138). ricoeur says that scrupulousness is the advanced point of guilt in that it carries to the extreme both the personal imputation of evil and the polarity of the just man and the wicked man. scrupulousness is a thoroughgoing and voluntary heteronomy, and pharisaism is an example of this mode of consciousness. to the pharisees, the torah is revelation and the revelation is torah. with scrupulousness we also get the idea of merit – the idea that the worth of a man issues from the worth of his acts. but pharisaism shows also the limit of this kind of religious scruple. here, the godman relation is confined to a practical relation of a will that commands and a will that obeys (ricoeur, 1969, p. 133). guilt can also become a curse and a hell of its own (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 139-143). this is because man is powerless to satisfy all the demands of the law. man will never be justified by the law because perfection is infinite and the commandments are unlimited in number. selfrighteousness, or the attempt to reduce sin by observance, becomes sin itself. this is the pauline “curse of law” (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 140, 142). most important in the symbolism of guilt, however, is that what is in question now is someo ne who is at the same time both captive of evil and responsible for it. ricoeur recapitulates this experience and his analysis of the primary symbols of evil in the concept of the servile will (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 151-152.). this concept, however, is not directly accessible. if one tries to give it an object, it destroys itself, for it short-circuits the idea of a free will and the idea of servitude. even though the concept of the servile will is inaccessible directly, it can be – and is – spoken of indirectly with the primary symbols of evil: guilt, sin and stain. these symbols intertwine so that even guilt cannot, in fact, express itself except in the language of “captivity” and ”infection” inherited from the two prior stages of sin and defilement. guilt in the big book the theme of the guilty consciousness revolves in the big book around the “moral inventory” of the fourth step and the confession of sins of the fifth step of the recovery program. the program suggests that (we) alcoholics should first do a “searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves” and then admit “to god, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 71). the idea of the moral inventory is to take an objective look, a god's gaze, at one's deeds. the big book compares this to a commercial inventory that a business takes (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 76-80). it is a “fact-finding and fact-facing process,” an “effort to discover the truth about the stockin-trade.” it should be a “searching” and “fearless” look at one's life. first, the alcoholic is advised to look at all those cases where his self-esteem, pocketbook, ambitions, and personal relationships have been hurt. he should also take a look at his own mistakes: “whe re had we been selfish, dishonest, selfseeking and frightened?” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 79). latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 13 the moral inventory is a thoroughgoing account of how the sinfulness of the alcoholic, that is his self-centeredness, manifests itself concretely in his life. the idea of the objective truth becomes the idea of the self-accusing consciousness that tries to measure its own guilt and responsibility. “where were we to blame?,” the alcoholics are urged to ask and also to list their faults before them “in black and white” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 80). this moral inventory is followed by the confession of the fifth step (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 84-85). this confession is first made to god, which accentuates the fact that the alcoholic is guilty before god. confession is also made to another human being and the reasons for this seem to be pragmatic. confession to another human being is a check against selfdeception and it also teaches the alcoholic “humility, fearlessness and honesty” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 85). release from guilt is achieved through repentance, forgiveness, and mercy. the moral inventory and confession are followed in the recovery program by steps 6 and 7 where the alcoholic turns to god and humbly asks him to remove his “defects of character” or “shortcomings,” that is, asks for forgiveness and mercy (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 88-96). the amends of step eight and nine are made in order to ask for forgiveness from those that the alcoholic has harmed and also to repair the damage done. the text says that the alcoholic will probably be forgiven by the ones he has harmed. it states with regard to the alcoholic’s experience that: “in nine cases out of ten the unexpected happens. sometimes the man we are calling upon admits his own fault; so feuds of years' standing melt away in an hour. (…) o ur former enemies sometimes praise what we are doing and wish us well. occasionally they will offer assistance” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 90). with god, the alcoholic can rely on forgiveness and mercy. as mentioned earlier, the big book states that god will release the alcoholic of his alcoholism if sought (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 72). release from alcoholism is interpreted also to be a sign of god's mercy and grace. regarding the theme of the guilty consciousness and particularly that of scrupulousness, it is interesting to note that according to the big book moral inventory, confession, repentance, asking for forgiveness, and making amends should continue on a daily bas is after the process has been started (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 97-98). the tenth step of the recovery program suggests that the alcoholic should continue to take personal inventory and, when he is wrong, should promptly admit it. he should also pra y for knowledge of god's will for him and the power to carry it out (step 11) and practice the principles of the recovery program in all his affairs (step 12). alcohol is a subtle foe and the alcoholics get only “a daily reprieve contingent on the maintenance of” their “spiritual condition” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 97-98). the big book seems to imply that the alcoholic is relieved of his condition through his actions, or works. this idea is also included in the conception that the alcoholic will recover by following the “god-given” 12-step recovery program. on the other hand, those who are bound to make the program itself a burden and a curse for themselves are advised against the sin of selfrighteousness. right after the presentation of the recove ry program the big book teaches the right attitude for the program: “no one among us has been able to maintain anything like perfect latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 14 adherence to these principles. we are not saints. the point is, that we are willing to grow along spiritual lines. the principles we have set down are guides to progress. we claim spiritual progress rather than spiritual perfection” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 72). (concerning works and faith, see also lobdell, 2004, pp. 203-237; mercadante, 1996, p. 96.) the symbolism of evil and recovery above, i have interpreted the symbolism of evil of the big book of aa. i have tried to decipher what the text says and what it talks about when it talks about the alcoholic's experience of evil by using such symbols as stain, sin and guilt. but what does all this have to do with the alcoholics of real life who may confront this symbolism on the pages of the big book or in aa meetings? first, the text of the big book plays an important part in recovery in that it proposes to its reader a new mode of being and a new capacity for knowing himself or herself – a new way of seeing the world. according to ricoeur “to interpret is to follow the path of thought opened up by the text, to place oneself en route towards the orient of the text” (ricoeur, 1981, p. 162). this kind of interpretation that complies with the injunction of the text, that follows the “arrow” of the sense of the text and tries to think accordingly, in turn, initiates a new selfunderstanding. thus, when appropriating the text, the reader is “enlarged in his capacity of self-projection by receiving a new mode of being from the text itself” (ricoeur, 1976, p. 94). according to ricoeur, interpretation is “the process by which disclosure of new modes of being – or if you prefer wittgenstein to heidegger – of new forms of life – gives to the subject a new capacity for knowing himself” (ricoeur, 1976, p. 94). ricoeur here opposes the self, which proceeds from the understanding of the text, to the ego, which claims to precede it: “it is the text, with its universal power of world disclosure, which gives a self to the ego” (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 94-95). the notoriously famous problem of the “hermeneutical circle” is stated on an ontological level instead of taking it to mean a subjectivistic coincidence of psyches or even the understanding of the intention of the author or the original readers of the text (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 92-94). the text of the big book provides the alcoholic a new way of seeing the world and being in the world. it accomplishes this by using various discursive procedures such as the different symbols of evil that i have interpreted above. this symbolism of evil gives meaning to the alcoholic's blind, equivocal, and scandalous experience of evil that would shut up in itself without it (ricoeur, 1969, p. 7). the recovering alcoholic finds on the pages of the big book commonly shared symbols of stain, sin, and guilt with which he or she can express the experience of evil associated with alcoholism. the primary symbols of evil give a metamorphosed transcription of the world. the alcoholic of the big book is cursed by a magical illness, overwhelmed by the demonic power of alcohol. s/he has also fallen into sin. his or her relationship with god is arrogant and defiant; s/he has set himself in the place of god. s/he is also captive of his or her own ego which manifests itself, for example, as fear, resentment, selfishness, and dishonesty when the alcoholic unsuccessfully tries to live by self-propulsion. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 15 on the other hand, the symbolism of the big book also tells what recovery or release from the evil power of alcoholism is. the alcoholic has to admit his or her powerlessness over alcohol, respect the taboo, and refrain from the first drink. s/he has to confess his sinfulness and guiltiness, repent, ask for forgiveness, and repair the damage done. foremost, s/he needs to turn humbly to god and repair his or her relationship with him. moreover, one can claim that the recognition and confession of evil liberates in itself. according to ricoeur, evil and freedom are so closely linked that the two terms imply one another mutually (ricoeur, 1974, pp. 431-432). when a person takes upon himself the origin of evil s/he lays aside the claim that evil is a thing, something observable in physical, psychic or social reality. when s/he says: “it is i who have acted,” s/he asserts that there is no evil-being, there is only the evildone-byme. to take evil upon oneself is an act of language that imputes the evil act to oneself. this imputation posits in me the identity of the moral subject through past, present and future. i acknowledge that i could have acted and can act otherwise, freely. in this sense, one can claim that the symbolism of evil of the big book has a certain liberating power. even though the first, archaic symbol of stain posits evil to be a magical force that infects from without – alcoholism as a curse – the later, more advanced symbols of sin and guilt reveal this dialectic of evil and freedom. the big book portrays alco holism to be essentially alienation from the reality of self, others, and god (k urtz, 1999, p. 216). in order to recover, the alcoholic may follow the path of thought opened up by the text and find a symbolism that gives him or her the capacity to see alco hol, himself or herself, others and god in a new light. s/he may receive from the text a new mode of being. s/he may confess his illness, sinfulness and guiltiness and start to take responsibility for his past, present and future life. in the symbolic words of the big book s/he may “trust god and clean house” – and be “relieved of alcoholism.” references alcoholics anonymous. (1939). alcoholics anonymous. the story of how more than one hundred men have recovered from alcoholism. new york, ny: works publishing company. (reproduction published by the anonymous press.) alcoholics anonymous. (2010). information on a.a. retrieved from http://www.aa.org/lang/en/subpage.cfm?page=1 fingarette, h. (1989). heavy drinking. the myth of alcoholism as a disease. berkeley, ca: university of california press. klemm, d. (1983). the hermeneutical theory of paul ricoeur. a constructive analysis. lewisburg, pa: bucknell university press. kurtz, e. (1979). not-god. a history of alcoholics anonymous. center city, pa: hazelden. kurtz, e. (1999). why a.a. works. the intellectual significance of alcoholics anonymous. in e. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 16 kurtz, the collected ernie kurtz (pp. 177–228). new york, ny: authors choice press. kurtz, e. (2008). the collected ernie kurtz. new york, ny: authors choice press. lobdell, j. (2004). this strange illness. alcoholism and bill w. new york, ny: aldine de gruyter. mercadante, l. (1996). victims and sinners. spiritual roots of addiction and recovery. louisville, ky: westminster john knox press. pellauer, d. (2007). ricoeur: a guide for the perplexed. london, uk: continuum. ricoeur, p. (1969). the symbolism of evil. boston, ma: beacon press. ricoeur, p. (1974). the conflict of interpretations. essays in hermeneutics (d. ihde, ed.). evanston, il: northwestern university press. ricoeur, p. (1976). interpretation theory: discourse and the surplus of meaning. fort worth, tx: the texas christian university press. ricoeur, p. (1981). hermeneutics & the human sciences (j.b. thompson, ed.). paris, france: cambridge university press. ricoeur, p. (2008). from text to action. london, uk: continuum. simms, k. (2003). paul ricoeur. new york, ny: routledge. stolberg, v. (2006). a review of perspectives on alcohol and alcoholism in the history of american health and medicine. journal of ethnicity in substance abuse, 5(4), 39-106. tiebout, h. (1999). the collected writings. center city, mn: hazelden. vaillant, g. (1983). the natural history of alcoholism. cambridge, ma: harvard university press. white, w. (1998). slaying the dragon: the history of addiction treatment and recovery in america. bloomington, il: chestnut health systems. white, w. (2000). addiction as a disease: birth of a concept. counselor, 1, 46-51, 73. the twelve steps of alcoholics anonymous 1. we admitted we were powerless over alcohol that our lives had become unmanageable. 2. came to believe that a power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 17 3. made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of god as we understood him. 4. made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves. 5. admitted to god, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs. 6. were entirely ready to have god remove all these defects of character. 7. humbly asked him to remove our shortcomings. 8. made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all. 9. made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others. 10. continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it. 11. sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with god, as we understood him, praying only for knowledge of his will for us and the power to carry that out. 12. having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs. microsoft word mccaffreyfinal.docx corresponding author: graham mccaffrey email: gpmccaff@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics september 27, 2012 the author(s) 2012 “the pure guidelines of the monastery are to be inscribed in your bones and mind” dogen (2010, p. 42): mental health nurses’ practices as ritualized behaviour graham mccaffrey abstract forms of practice among nurses on acute care mental health units present a way of revealing how different traditions and values are in play between nurses and also within nurses. this paper represents one interpretive theme from a larger, hermeneutic study of nurses’ experiences of nursepatient relationships on acute care mental health units, using buddhist perspectives as a resource for interpretation of interviews with nurses. understandings of ritual in the zen buddhist tradition and catherine bell’s (2009a) concept of ritualized behavior enabled an interpretive analysis of nurses’ activities as the expression and reflexive reinforcement of underlying traditions, values, and beliefs. in particular, nurses’ preferences among ways of relating with patients evinced contrasting background traditions of confinement and therapeutically directed engagement. keywords buddhism, hermeneutics, mental health, nurse-patient relationship, ritual introduction the theme of ritual arose from a broader study in which i set out to explore how buddhist thought might be applied to understanding nurse-patient relationships in acute care units, based on a series of affinities between nursing and buddhist thought, including a concern with suffering and compassionate response to suffering (mccaffrey, raffin-bouchal, & moules, 2012a). one of the other affinities i discussed is the emphasis on practice in nursing and buddhism. i used a text called instructions for the tenzo [head cook] (tanahashi, 1985) by dogen, the founder of the soto zen school in japan, to illustrate the point that in zen tradition an everyday task such as preparing a meal is at the same time a practice of awareness of self, others, and environment. from this, i develmccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 2 oped an exploration of ritual as a way of organizing practice. the research approach in my study was hermeneutics, drawing primarily on the philosophical hermeneutics of gadamer (1960/2005). after receiving ethics approval from the conjoint health research ethics board at the university of calgary, i interviewed four nurses with experience of mental health nursing on inpatient units. i then transcribed the interviews and analyzed the texts through processes of interpretive reflection, discussion, and writing. hermeneutics was a strong research approach for this question because of the basic structure of conversation that is “hermeneutics in practice” (palmer, 2001, p. 11). the figure of the conversation was replicated in the exchanges between nurses and patients as the topic of the research, in the research interviews themselves, and in the dialogue between contemporary nursing and buddhist thought (mccaffrey, raffin-bouchal, & moules, 2012b). gadamer, in his later work, expressed openness to world cultures, from the hermeneutic stance of creative engagement without a need or intent to subsume one worldview in terms of the other. “indeed, we in the humanities and social sciences need to accept our worldwide heritage not only in its otherness but also in recognizing the claim this larger heritage makes on us” (gadamer, 2001, p. 54). ritual: background one of the guiding assumptions of my research was that explorations along and across the borders between traditions and cultures can yield useful insights into one's home culture by affording opportunities to look at it from an unfamiliar point of view. in the course of analyzing the transcripts of the interviews, it became apparent that a phenomenon present in all of them was that of forms of organization of nurses' behaviour in the acute unit environment. for instance, nurses talked about the way that exchanges with patients about taking medications could be structured, from an authoritative “you’ve got to take this medication” to a more curious “can i ask you if you’re worried about something?” the difference is not only in the form of words, but also in the assumptions about where people stand in the unit, both literally in relation to the space and figuratively in terms of power and status. other examples included the organization of groups for different purposes, managing disturbed behavior, and the organization of a leaving party. i will discuss these in more detail. reflection upon the formation of activity, and the nurses' own comments about contrasting formations, their likes and dislikes and preferences, led me in turn to wonder about the idea of ritual as a means of shedding light on how the nurses saw themselves and others working in relationship with their patients. some nursing authors have addressed the question of ritual, for example with regard to practices around dying (o’gorman, 1998) or in an intensive care unit (philpin, 2007). philpin (2002) explored different meanings of ritual that have been taken up in nursing and social science literature. she noted that often ritual has been used as a pejorative term by nurse authors, to denote mindless routinized practice, and unscientific adherence to tradition, the way things have always been done, rather than an evidence based practice. philpin herself concluded that a study of ritual in nursing could open up "a rich source of insight into the meanings attached to the accomplishment of nursing care" (2002, p. 151). this, of course, reflects a wider debate about ritual which, as faure pointed out, “has had a bad press in the west, at least it has ever since luther” (2004, p. 161). my intention here is not to start from the assumption that mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 3 ritual must be mechanical, repetitive, and a substitute for lively thought. rather, like philpin i suggest that it is not necessarily like that, and if not, then what else may be said about it? traditions in play in mental health nursing i discovered that seeing behaviour as ritualized helped to clarify an underlying phenomenon of different cultures at play within the overarching term “mental health.” the significance of this for my research was to shift my thinking away from an idea of the singular nurse-patient relationship to a plurality of kinds of nurse-patient relationships, understood not simply as variations between individuals but as expressions through ritualized behaviours of different cultural currents operating on single units. the traditions i have in mind are, broadly those of confinement and of relational care with therapeutic intent. the tradition of confinement of the mentally ill tends to carry with it values of objectification of the other and considerations of safety as an end-stop argument (clarke, 2009). the contemporary hegemony of biomedical explanatory systems and treatments in psychiatry tend to support objectification through taxonomic diagnosis and separation of the biochemical from the realm of lived experience (aho, 2008). relational care with therapeutic intent, by contrast, emphasizes the effort on behalf of clinicians to arrive at some understanding of the patient’s world that can then be turned to account in working with the patient to improve his or her life and capacity for living well. i employ this somewhat unwieldy phrase to include both the importance of the relational encounter as a locus for practice, and the element of bringing a specifically therapeutic intention to bear. relationship in itself is not the point, since after-all, the orderly and the patient in the victorian asylum were also in relationship with each other. the second tradition has influenced nursing more or less directly through the psychotherapeutic traditions and modalities of talk therapy as well as by virtue of the basic presence of nurses alongside patients providing a natural setting for therapeutically-oriented encounters (peplau, 1952/1988). in particular, one of the participants talked about her experience of working with the tidal model (barker & buchanan-barker, 1995), which i will discuss later for the ways in which it served to highlight some of the cross-currents of these traditions in practice. ritualized behaviour my route into thinking about ritual, and finding creative ways of using it interpretively began with my own experience of being exposed to imported (from a western standpoint) forms of ritualized behaviour in zen buddhist practice. i will begin by discussing the significance of ritual in the zen buddhist tradition and then put this into a context of a western academic understanding of ritual by catherine bell (2009a, 2009b), using these perspectives as a stepping off point into the interpretation of the nurses’ experiences. as i write, i have just returned from a week-long sesshin, or intensive zen practice period in a forest by a lake in british columbia, canada. this form of practice entails a distinct change in the rhythms and activities of daily life. we rose to the sound of a bell at five am, took our places on meditation cushions and spent much of the day in sitting and walking meditation or in practical tasks like cooking and washing up. we practiced largely in silence apart from necmccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 4 essary functional exchanges, chants, or listening to formal teaching talks, and regulated our interactions with each other through formalized gestures like bowing, and by an effort to maintain awareness of oneself in space in relation to others. to begin with, there is an alien-ness to all this as one consciously tries to remember to bow in the right place or learn the steps of ritualized meals. it can seem arbitrary, even sinister, or just silly. then, over the course of a few days a greater naturalness emerges in living together in this way, along with a growing recognition of the functionality of these forms for focusing the mind in meditation while ensuring that participants are fed and sheltered and in the right place at the right time. the ritualization of everyday activities is thus one of the features of zen ritual, common to both rinzai and soto schools of zen. dogen wrote in his instruction to the tenzo [head cook], “when you wash rice and prepare vegetables, you must do it with your own hands, and with your own eyes, making sincere effort. do not be idle, even for a moment. do not be careful about one thing and careless about another” (tanahashi, 1995, p. 54). there is the ordinary task, and at the same time the expression of the value of meditative awareness. zen also has its formal ceremonies and symbolic objects but it is this aspect of infusing ordinary activity with the effort of awareness that connects it to understanding nursing activity. another aspect to note is that ritual is not an end in itself, a series of rote moves to be memorized and repeated, but part of the cultivation of a practitioner. reducing ritual to mechanistic habit, we fail to understand how a practice of ritual can bring about a disciplined transformation of the practitioner, in this case how zen ritual can give rise to zen mind. the key, of course, is the gradual, even imperceptible, scripting of character through mental and physical exercise. (wright, 2008, p. 11) my focus here is not on the soteriological goal of zen ritual, but on precisely this insight into how ritualized activity both reflects a framework of meaning and shapes its participants. in this view, ritual is not inevitably mechanistic, but has the dimension of a living process by which the person who enters into the ritual brings it into being through its enactment, and is simultaneously acted upon to shape his or her way of beingin-the-world. one important aspect of this perspective, which is consistent with the theme of non-duality in buddhism, is that it recognizes “the extent to which the mental and the physical are intertwined” (wright, 2008, p. 12). this reflects a shift away from earlier western understandings of zen as anti-ritualistic and as a discipline purely of the mind (faure, 2004), towards a “postcartesian” engagement with its “fundamental corporeality...as a specifically embodied practice” (wright, 2008, p. 13). when i come to look more closely at the experiences of nurses, it will become clearer how useful this insight is in remembering that the term mental health carries within itself the cartesian separation of mind and body, whereas the practice of mental health nursing is an embodied practice in which the placement of bodies within a specific physical environment carries meanings. it is only through actions and speech, flesh and blood and vocal cords that we recognize “mental” disorder and in turn work with it. catherine bell’s (2009a, 2009b) work about ritual further helps to build an understanding of how one might employ it as a conceptual tool for examining the actions of nurses on mental health units. this work is useful in trying to understand what is going on in ritualized behavior, and to link the idea of formation in zen ritual to the forms mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 5 through which nurses express the nursepatient relationship. she put forward a framework for talking about ritualization in which, “ritual activities are restored to their rightful context, the multitude of ways of acting in a particular culture” (bell, 2009a, p. 140). the framework is based on an understanding of human practice, with four characteristics. first of all, practice is situational, such that it cannot be properly understood outside of its particular context. for example, one of the study participants, looking back to an earlier stage in her career on an acute unit for adolescents talked about a leaving ritual, commenting about how she saw this in retrospect. one of the psychiatrists was going away and we did as a goodbye skit for him, ten of us pretended to be one of the kids on the unit...we'd step forward and we kind of acted out these kids...like, how disrespectful is that? she recalled that the participants and the psychiatrist all found it funny at the time. it seemed that looking back with the distance of time, the ritual appeared differently: the specific context of that place and moment had been lost. next, in bell’s account, practice is “inherently strategic, manipulative, and expedient” and “a ceaseless play of situationally effective schemes, tactics, and strategies” (2009a, p. 82). all of the participants talked at some level about the range of activities they were involved in as nurses on an acute unit. one of them gave an overview of some of the major approaches. there was the medical element physical obs, drugs in high quantities often when i look back on it, a lot of polypharmacy. there was a social component to it. the nurses in the unit that i worked in were very visible for the patients, you know, we were usually out and about with them doing something on the wards, so whether that was just sitting down with them and playing games, watching tv, seeing if they were concentrating, just sounding out some of those psychotic ideas that people were expressing through to behavioural work that we used to do we used to get patients in with ocd for example and we'd do quite a bit of stuff with them to try and limit the impact that that had on their day-to-day function. we'd take groups i used to run an anxiety management group. the way the participant expressed this list conveys the sense of a play of strategies, linked to the goals of monitoring and modifying disturbances in thought and behavior. the third characteristic of practice is “a fundamental “misrecognition’ of what it is doing, a misrecognition of its limits and constraints, and of its relationship between its ends and its means” (bell, 2009a, p. 82). this suggests that one cannot fully know what one is doing while one is doing it, and any later, purportedly objective reconstruction of the activity will miss the dynamic play of possibility that was present as it was happening. the element of misrecognition may go some way towards explaining how it is that in mental health nursing we cannot be sure our favoured therapeutic approaches are having the effect we desire, or if we do witness the desired effect, that it was our approach that brought it about. this appears as an element in the participants’ stories of relationships with particular patients that they believed were helpful, and yet these were stories without endings, in which the fruits of the relationship were unknown to the nurse. mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 6 ...there are patients that i think i can say, probably yeah, what i did...made a difference to them but can i say what i did made a difference to what became of them? which was kind of the end of your question i can't because i really can't in my mind's eye think of, or see a patient where i really know what became of them. the fourth feature intrinsic to practice is what bell (2009a) called “redemptive hegemony” (p. 85), referring to patterns of power, dominance and subordination in our awareness of the social world, lived out through a range of activities. what makes this redemptive is that we derive a sense of meaning and purpose and of our place in the world from these patterns, which appear to us as “a natural weave of constraint and possibility” (p. 85). i found it interesting to notice that whereas none of the participants talked much about the role of psychiatrists, when they did make an appearance it was often to make something happen on the unit, or to stifle something from happening. one nurse recalled the psychiatrist for the unit: ...actually invited myself and [a colleague] if we wanted to learn group therapy, and do the training for it...so i think it might have been more invitational than self-selecting. it was seen as prestige too, yeah. another nurse, talking about a different unit, described how the psychiatrists’ priorities would take precedence over those of patients or nurses. and so the physicians will say, “whoa, it's to get them stabilized on this medication,” they sort of have their medical goals and um, while the patient, it might come up what their wishes are but a lot of times it's discounted. um nursing will bring up maybe their ideas, but in terms of a plan, half the time there isn’t, which is really very difficult to then do anything... in bell’s view, ritual has these four features of practice, but ritualization distinguishes itself from other forms of action when there is a differentiation between certain forms of action within a particular culture. ritualized activity comes into being in response to some situational and strategic need and is not therefore solely a matter of routinized behaviour. the next feature of ritualization in bell’s account is that of an open-ended dialectic of body and environment. i have already used the example of a zen sesshin to show how the detailed organization of bodies and gestures in space and time is simultaneously demanded by the environment, and creates the environment. the critical additional point here is the element of belief systems and power relations that underwrite ritualized activity. one would not for long put up with the finely regulated routine of a sesshin unless one had at least a basic sympathy towards the zen tradition. in turn, power relations are expressed through “the production of a ritualized agent able to wield physically a scheme of subordination or insubordination” (bell, 2009a, p. 100). thus, through participation in a ritualized activity, in a specific body-environment dialectic, one knows one's place, and this knowing is the expression of certain power relations (though recalling the characteristic of misrecognition, this is probably not construed by the participant at the time). “hence, ritualization, as the production of a ritualized agent via the interaction of a body within a structured and structuring environment, always takes place within a larger and very immediate sociocultural situation” (bell, 2009a, p. 100). one of the participants described an experience of arriving to work on an acute mental health unit in anmccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 7 other country that readily illustrates the point. i remember the first day that i turned up and the it was like it was a scene from one flew over the cuckoo’s nest, the whitewashed walls, the grilles on the windows, and the nurses in white dresses with their hats and the male nurses in all white but just with little shorts and knee high socks and white trainers and the aesthetic just didn't work for me...so i thought “i can't work here.” on top of which it was substantially gate keeping that the nurses were doing, there was no real therapeutic role for nurses in that kind of environment. this nurse worked on the unit for about two weeks, but by this account had the measure of the place at first glance. clearly implicit in this description is a tradition and set of beliefs that spoke eloquently through the environment, including the nurses’ dress, and the conditioned forms of nursing behaviour. in a kind of lived foucauldian (2006) flashback, the asylum, confinement, and psychiatric power are all present in the image of this particular unit. a further element in bell’s account of ritualization is that ritual asserts difference. it separates the sacred from the profane, or the clean from the dirty and such antinomies are basic to ritualized activity. more than this, however, the assertion of difference also tends to produce a hierarchy of oppositions, which are felt by its participating agents as another source of order and meaning. in sum, ritualization not only involves the setting up of oppositions but also, through the privileging built into such an exercise it generates hierarchical schemes to produce a loose sense of totality and systematicity. in this way, ritual dynamics afford an experience of order as well as the fit between this taxonomic order and the real world of experience. bell’s framework allows for the possibility of seeing everyday activity through a lens of ritualized behavior, and the use of ritual in the zen tradition makes this explicit. what the example of the sesshin also does is to show how the everyday can be rendered unfamiliar and thus seen anew. these understandings of ritualized behavior create a way of trying to bring unfamiliarity to the mental health unit environment in which nurses are immersed. different rituals, different traditions “some beings see water as wondrous blossoms, but they do not use blossoms as water. hungry ghosts see water as raging fire or pus and blood. dragons and fish see water as a palace or a pavilion...human beings see water as water. water is seen as dead or alive depending on the seer's causes and conditions. thus, the views of all beings are not the same. question this matter now.” dogen (2010, pp. 158-159). dogen’s poetic expression of how different interests and viewpoints give rise to different ways of seeing the same thing, even a taken-for-granted element like water, holds open the idea that different nurses see their role and hence their relating to patients in different ways. the zen perspective offers a way of looking at these everyday nursing activities as interconnected with the physical and social environment, and both expressing and cultivating values and assumptions. then, proceeding from the discussion of bell’s framework, there are a number of activities that participants talked about as part of their work with patients on acute care mental health units that i interpreted as ritualized behaviour. when seen in this way, mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 8 bell's analysis can be used to interpret activities for what they might disclose of a shifting plurality of cultures, expressing various traditions and values, within the ostensibly singular culture of nursing on a unit. this is especially clear-cut in the case of one unit, on which a relational model of care called the tidal model, created by a british nurse, phil barker (barker & buchanan-barker, 2005), had been introduced. i have quoted dogen, partly following barker’s penchant for aquatic metaphors, but as this quotation warns us, not all beings see water as water. it is this variation in perspective i want to try to convey. three nursing practices among the study participants, there were a number of distinct activities that they talked about as part of their work with patients, but within a single mental health unit. one, which they all addressed in some form, is the forcible constraint of a patient who is aggressive and seen as out of control. this is a version drawn from experience of an adolescent unit but one that is probably familiar to all nurses who have worked on acute units: we also and we used medications pretty freely if we saw a kid escalate, our first effort would be to try to talk them down...and then the next if it escalated the next thing it would be they would be given a choice would they like a pill or an injection usually chlorpromazine would be the sedative or haldol. and so we thought we were being benevolent by giving them a choice that they could choose the pill or their medication. if they refused, then security would be called in if there wasn't enough males on the unit to restrain them and then, i got to go into the med room to draw up the syringe and they're medicated. here, obviously, is a pretty raw exercise of power, but it is situational, strategic and stepped: talking first, then the more benign oral administration of medication, then the holding down to give an injection. gender relations also come into play in the mention of the assumption that male nurses would take the lead in the physical restraint or, in their absence security staff from the wider hospital community beyond the unit. what would be highly unusual outside of its context is, of course, everyday activity to nurses on acute mental health units. another nurse talked about trying to maintain a relationship with the patient at such a critical moment, seeing it as one episode in a continuing connection: ...at the time when you’re doing this you just gently and firmly remind them that i'm doing this for the best interest of you, myself and this unit. this is what needs to be done because it doesn't appear as though your behaviour can be maintained in a level that's safe on the unit and that’s it...this isn’t being done to punish you, this is being done to increase safety for the whole unit. in this way, the action can be understood as an example of the genre of rituals of affliction that attempt “to rectify a state of affairs that has been disturbed or disordered; they heal, exorcise, protect, and purify” (bell, 2009b, p. 115). it also shows the social aspect of ritual, which is apparent in the example of the sesshin. the actions of each individual take place within an unfolding of a community. in terms of the underlying history of mental health care, the raw exercise of power in the name of safety certainly manifests the confinement tradition. the nurse’s comments about contextualizing an event of restraint for the patient also reveal the presence of the relational-therapeutic perspective, taking account of what the mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 9 event may have been like for the patient. this is an example of what clarke referred to as “moral wakefulness” (2009, p. 28) even in the presence of the socially agreed upon necessity at times of forcible restraint. another kind of activity that was mentioned by most participants was running various kinds of therapeutic groups. these ranged from the theoretically sophisticated and formalized, to more improvised and pragmatic types of groups. the nurse who was invited by the psychiatrist to undertake group training recalled that, “we were really under the influence of the milan family therapy team at that time. the milan group had just come...and presented and so this is we were very much using that whole model of paradox, counter-paradox.” another nurse talked about establishing a weekend planning group for patients going out on pass with the unit recreation therapist. ...we sort of partnered up and thought it would be a great case for nursing and rec therapy to work together, and we sort of address rec therapy issues and nursing issues when people go for the weekend. she discussed the importance of partnerships with like-minded professionals on the unit as being a critical factor in the creation of groups like this. a different group, for family support, had been in abeyance without the motivation of the social worker who had started it: our previous social worker started the family support group, he then left, which is the reason why it kind of fell through, we tried to carry it so he initiated that, so it just kind of depends who's there again, fragmented right, depending on the interest level and motivation or whatever... going back to the situational and strategic aspects of ritualization, it is plain in these examples how a number of circumstances had to come together to bring about nurses’ participation in groups as an intentionally therapeutic way of relating with patients. not least of the circumstances is what these examples reveal about the coalescence of power and influence on units. whereas the therapy groups in the first example had the sanction of the unit psychiatrist and the participant remembered “it was seen as prestige, too,” the existence of the weekend planning group and the family support group were far more contingent upon horizontal alliances between nurses and allied health professionals. the groups appear to have existed only as long as the rationale, motivation, and energy to run them persisted in particular individuals without any institutional memory to hold them in mind. while organized group therapies clearly draw upon psychotherapeutic traditions, their voluntary and even marginal status within unit cultures suggests that the relational-therapeutic is politically weak relative to practices of confinement upheld by statutory fiat such as, in the jurisdiction in which i am writing, the mental health act of alberta. the third common type of activity as part of the nurse's role is the administration of medications. this did not figure all that prominently in the interviews, perhaps because it is such a taken-for-granted way of relating with patients. nurses have to follow clearly mandated steps, now computer based, in ensuring that patients are given (or at least offered) the correct medication at the correct time, and that this is accurately recorded. one nurse mentioned “thinking about doing my meds for the whole day” with the inference that this is one of the structuring routines of nursing time. each shift is marked out by the medication schedule of the nurse's assigned patients for that day, which entails mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 10 for example knowing that at breakfast time and lunchtime, there will be medications to give out. nurses are as much bound to this ritual as the patients. it is not surprising that negotiation over medications can become one common scene of dialogue between nurse and patient. participants identified different approaches to this on the part of nurses. one identified a kind of approach in which a nurse will say to a patient: “you have to take this medication,” and i think it's more the approach and the way things are said. “you have to take this medication,” well actually they don't and you know, just, it's “i know what i'm doing, i'm the expert here and you're gonna do what i say,” that authoritative kind of thing. sometimes you have to say “you have to take the medication” but you know, a lot of times they don't want to and “no, you have to” instead of – “can i ask if you're worried about something with the medication?” like i think it's the approach. another nurse made a similar point about trying to understand the context of a patient's behaviour before assuming that medication would be the best strategy to address the patient's situation at that moment: ...you have a patient who is schizophrenic and they're hallucinating and you can tell that they are distressed. so rather than saying like, sitting down and having that conversation or even walking beside them as they are pacing the hallway, “you seem to be getting a bit upset right now is there something i can do to alleviate some of your discomfort or have i totally misread the situation?” and then it gives them the opportunity to say “yeah, either i am totally upset or nah, i'm fine, don't worry about me i just want to pace.” “great, you know what, if you need anything let me know.” by contrast, she characterized a more perfunctory response, picturing the nurse sitting behind the long desk at the front of the unit, watching patients: “nursing from the desk, patient appears agitated. what’s going to be the next response? patient offered, you know, ativan or zyprexa.” what these accounts suggest is the degree to which nurses are bound by the activity of giving psychotropic medications, and if they often feel that patients must take them, they certainly feel that they must give them. they also demonstrate, however, that this compulsory element of practice can be a space of sympathetic curiosity and support for patients when nurses are prepared to exercise judgment about what is most helpful in a specific situation. traditions expressed through practices these examples of nursing activity, which can be understood as ritualized within bell's (2009a) framework, reveal the kind of sets of oppositions and contrasts that she saw as an element of ritual. one such opposition is that between voluntary and compulsory nursing activities that structure relationships with patients. in every case, group work, whether sanctioned by a psychiatrist or selfinitiated, was an optional activity. not all nurses chose to do it (all four participants gave instances of this). no one pointed out that they had to give (or more precisely, account for) medications, because they did not need to, it is a given. other sets of oppositions are at play in the activities described, and in all forms of nurse-patient relationship in the specific setting of the acute care mental health unit. these might include nursepatient, harm-safety, restraint-talking, on or off-unit, stigma-acceptance, and reasonmccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 11 unreason. ritualization serves both to define and to animate these antinomies. at times, they appear clear-cut and permanent, which may be experienced as a source of security or of frustration according to where one stands among the “binary oppositions [that] almost always involve asymmetrical relations of dominance and subordination by which they generate hierarchically organized relationships” (bell, 2009a, p. 102). the account from one of the participants of her experience working with the tidal model of mental health care exemplifies the dynamics of ritualization, and reveals a kind of multicultural complexity within a single inpatient unit. barker, the creator of the model, stated: the tidal model is a philosophical approach to developing genuine mental health care. it is less about treating or managing a form of mental illness and more about following a person, in an effort to provide the kind of support that might help them on the way to recovery. (barker & buchanan-barker, 2005, p. 17) one of the underlying assumptions of the model is that people are always in a state of flux. this means that when someone is admitted as a patient on a mental health unit, her or his experience matters, because the person's story conveys truths about the origins of present distress, and directions to its amelioration. the task of the nurse is to provide an environment of safety and support, while paying attention to the story and working with the patient to find a way through. the model has prescribed written forms that guide the nurse's conversation with the patient to create an initial assessment, and then in setting longer and shorterterm goals for recovery. an important element of the model is that the patient's own story, in his or her own words is recorded, written down either by the patient or the nurse and becomes a resource for the professionals involved in caring for the patient. forming and being formed understandings of ritual open up ways of seeing the tidal model not only as a technique for doing care, or even as a therapeutic intervention but as a means of forming the outlook and behavior of practitioners. this harks back to the quotation in the title of the paper, dogen’s injunction to his monks that “the pure guidelines of the monastery are to be inscribed in your bones and mind” dogen (2010, p. 42). put in a more contemporary voice, “the practices of zen ritual are forms of practical understanding and knowledge” (wright, 2008, p. 14). according to bell (2009a, 2009b), those who carry out rituals are not passive receptacles of tradition, but participants in the enactment and transformation of tradition. that is not to say that the process of transformation might not be slow, even imperceptible and unintended to those in the ritual, but to observe that ritual is formation, the formation of environments and the formation of participants. benner (2011), in her recent work, has also adopted the language of formation to describe how nurses develop as practitioners. she wrote, “the practice demands and resources and possibilities form [italics in original] the way the nurse is in the world and reveals new aspects of the world of nursing practice” (p. 348). when we pay attention to the actual forms of practice, it becomes apparent that the forms form us. the facticity of the noun becomes the activity of the verb. the doubling of identity in the word form corresponds with bell’s emphasis on ritualization over ritual, while recmccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 12 ognizing that without a defined activity ritualization slips away into generality. form has a third sense, which pertains to the tidal model, which is that of the piece of paper (or electronic facsimile) with predetermined content and intent. forms in this third sense also serve to form our behaviour and ways of seeing, by getting us to ask or to answer one question rather than another, or to focus our mind on certain parts of our experience. tellingly, the study participant typified some of her colleagues’ resistance to the tidal model in the belief that, “i don’t need a piece of paper to dictate what questions i ask a patient.” such nurses would, of course, be quite right to suspect they were being formed, indeed re-formed by this model (which is another kind of form) and its array of paper forms. one trouble with this objection is that in a regulated environment like a hospital, there is no choice between forms or no forms; at most there are only choices among forms. perhaps refusal is understandable as an exercise of symbolic resistance to bureaucracy, but actually it is to declare a preference for one form over another. in this case, the opposition between voluntary and compulsory activity was operative. there are hospital policies about how often nurses have to submit to the form of making an entry in progress notes, but while the introduction of the tidal model was accompanied with considerable effort by unit educators providing encouragement, education and support, it was an optional activity. the participant in the study who brought up the tidal model welcomed its introduction on her unit, and had been using it for about five years prior to the research interview. she said she found, “it was a great way to promote a conversation that might never have taken place.” this is an evocative statement, from the point of view of the recognition of the power of conversation that broadly underlies the traditions of talk therapy. it also echoes the importance of conversation in hermeneutics. it is even salutary to consider, negatively, the potential conversations that never take place if nurses do not ask, do not elicit the patient’s story, perhaps in favour of other narratives such as dsm iv diagnosis (american psychiatric association, 2000) or external observations of behaviour. the nurse mentioned, while recalling working with one particular patient, that another nurse, who was also caring for that patient during her stay in hospital “didn’t do tidal model.” this meant that she felt unable fully to share the work she was engaged in, and the therapeutic insights she was gaining in her conversations with the patient. she described the difference in approach as: where i was addressing a like in the here and now if everything has brought you here, how do we change? where you go to in the future? and this particular nurse went back and was like rehashing all the things that had brought her to that point. she said that the psychiatrist made a note in the chart that staff should not keep focusing on the patient’s childhood abuse because it was holding her back, this being the approach taken by the nurse who “didn’t do tidal model.” there is more to a conversation that is intentionally therapeutic than a nurse simply talking to a patient. an important distinction emerges between an attitude of respect for the patient’s own life story, in order to consider present and future in meaningful ways, and joining the patient (or even encouraging the patient) in staying stuck in memories of the past in a way that appears to be disabling. this can be motivated by compassion in the form of a feeling mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 13 of sympathy for the other’s suffering, but in itself it is not likely to be helpful for long. the significance of this reported disjunction between the nurses working with the same patient is what it suggests about different cultures among nurses on the unit, expressed through different rituals. the tidal model would involve the nurse sitting down with an individual patient, for some time, to work on the extensive initial assessment. the nurse’s questions would be shaped by the text of the model. the model itself, as barker pointed out above is the concrete manifestation of a certain way of regarding mental health, people suffering mental distress, and those who have undertaken to care for them. the idea of the person-as-flux is critical in being able to countenance possibilities. although identity is thus in a sense open, it is not a question of fake sameness the nurse is not the patient. the task of the nurse is to recognize the patient’s unique suffering, but not simply to identify with it. as for the rituals of the second nurse, it is harder to say. the nurse i interviewed characterized the opponents of the tidal model, as quoted above, as seeing themselves as resisting being dictated to. in the particular instance the participant talked about, there were obviously conversations going on between the patient and other nurses, raking over the history of abuse. it is usual practice for a nurse to meet with an assigned patient for a daily “one-to-one” with the patient. this is an individual meeting between nurse and patient, but beyond that there is little or no particular structure to what is said, or for that matter, what is the point. it may be that the one-to-one is a ghostly remnant of psychotherapy, a privileging of the private and personal conversation between a mental health professional and a patient. peplau (1989) pointed out that interactions are not an end in themselves: among the many factors that get in the way of therapeutic nurse-patient relationships are the expectations of nurses. one such expectation is that because a nurse spent a whole hour with a patient, she or he hopes and expects that a certain change would occur – but then it does not. in one workshop a nurse spent five minutes with a withdrawn patient, pummeling him with questions, expecting patient to talk, and when he did not, the nurse walked away. (p. 203) the one-to-one is a deceptively flat term, with an implied false equality in which it is impossible to know which one is the nurse, and which the patient. as peplau hinted, we always enter into encounters with our own attachments to what we think ought to happen, and if it does not, then we will tell ourselves a story about what went wrong. more often than not, it is the other person’s fault, but it could be a story about our own mistakes or inadequacy. either way, without some reflexive awareness of what one makes of an encounter, as opposed to considering it as a given, impermeable to interpretation, it is easy to get stuck. the one-toone links but it also isolates. it summons up an interaction between nurse and patient, yet simultaneously separates off the interaction. seen as the expression of the interplay of traditions, just as engaged curiosity may be brought to bear on the compulsory practice of medication-offering, here it may be that talk can be inflected with values of objectification and distancing. the idea of professional autonomy, present in the one nurse’s rejection of the tidal model speaks to the framework of the ritual of the one-to-one, to a cultural world being brought to life. in this world, however, what passes for professional autonomy may actually sanction power over the patient, and defensiveness about practice. it is a literal view mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 14 of autonomy, which is actually quite restricted. a more realistic and worldly view accepts that autonomy entails the responsibility to work with others, to recognize the interconnectedness of one’s activity. autonomy, to be effective, is enlivened through recognition of its limitations. in her account of working with the tidal model, the nurse described seeking connection along two vectors. one of these was the narrative vector already mentioned, the connection between past and future in the present, the connection between the question “where from?” and the question “where to?” dogen went even further than this idea of a linear connection in his essay called the time being (dogen, 2010). he saw our being as time, not merely in time. thus, “the time being has a characteristic of flowing. so-called today flows into tomorrow, today flows into yesterday, yesterday flows into today. and today flows into today, tomorrow flows into tomorrow” (p. 106). in this fluidity, nursing practice becomes oriented towards openness and the possibility of change, not only the future is open, but the past too that so often becomes frozen into our sense of an unchangeable identity. the second vector of connection is that of sharing the patient’s story and the story of her present as a patient, of the day-to-day flowing of her self-understanding. here the nurse met with disconnection between what i would characterize as different cultural understandings of nursing on the acute unit. she talked about being aware of expecting her work in eliciting the patient’s story, and using that to set goals, to be received differently in different places. she would strategize with colleagues about how to deploy information to have it heard: i think we’re doing good, i think we’re on the right track, but how do i put forward the information i have from tonight for tomorrow’s day staff? you know, and who do you think will actually listen to it? likewise, she would think about how to suggest to patients they should present the work they had done together so that the patient might have an experience of continuity. if i know there’s other nurses coming on for the next day and you know how you can see who will be working with the patient the next day and i know they are totally against the tidal model, i would never say to my patient, “tomorrow morning when you get up ask for the day focus sheet [one of the tidal model forms] and discuss with your nurse.” that just won’t happen. so then i’m basically saying there’s a huge disconnect on the unit. this is telling for the daily experience of practicing with two cultures. this was especially apparent for this nurse, where the tidal model stood as a distinct ritualization of the tradition of relational practice with therapeutic intent. nurses in the study described practices that expressed the confinement tradition for the most part at second hand. they were critical of ways in which they saw other nurses interacting with patients, but at times also recognized that they participated in practices more associated with confinement. cross-cultural nursing in this sense is a feature of acute care units, which are governed by external forces such as legally enforced compulsory admission and treatment of people in acute mental illness. such complexity cuts both ways. does it mean, for example, that the tradition of biomedical psychiatry, enacted through the compulsory ritualization of medication giving is not therapeutic? by this i do not mean the sense in which medications are themmccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 15 selves called therapeutic agents at the chemical level, but rather that medication-giving, even when done in the most perfunctory manner, takes place within networks of social relationships and meanings. does it mean that prioritizing the maintenance of a safe environment, at times restraining a patient who may well do harm to himor herself, or others, is not therapeutic for the collective body of the unit as well as the individual at that moment? at times, the participants made clear their preference for an approach that is inclusive, curious, empathetic, yet all of them also accepted the necessity in taking part in the harsher, more physical rituals of acute care mental health. it is worth noting too, the common concern that ritualization can tend towards literalism and routine. i talked with a colleague who had also had experience of working with the tidal model. she supported its intent, but had found that at times the pro forma questions were confusing to patients. she felt that sometimes nurses, especially those with less experience, were too dependent on following the forms, and getting the questions right and so lost sight of the individual experience, which is intended to be at the heart of the model. conclusion the use of bell’s framework of ritualization provides a way of reading back from nursing activities to the cultural variations, ideologies, and power relations that are at work on mental health units. this way of interpreting practice suggests that nurses, in their daily practice, negotiate between cultures, and move between cultures according to circumstances. these cultures are enacted in the detail of how nurses move in the physical environment, how they place themselves in relation to the desk that divides nurses from patients, who sits and who stands. this is the lesson that zen ritual shows us in its very unfamiliarity. the distance afforded by cross cultural seeing makes clearer how our rituals condition our way of being in the world, and our ways of seeing. it is not that some of us submit to ritualization, while others practice as free individuals. it is a matter of becoming more aware of the rituals we choose, and what kind of a world we wish to bring into being through them. the histories that are brought to life in the daily rituals of practice both precede contemporary mental health units, and extend beyond them into the institutions and policies that help to shape nurses’ experiences. we might ask, when considering the future of practice, what rituals do we want to see? which rituals are the most helpful to patients? these are questions that speak to the deeper values we believe are expressed through the social phenomenon of the acute mental health unit. while an exposition along the lines of ritualization can hopefully enable nurses to become more aware of choices they make in how to practice at each moment, there are broader implications for administrators and policy makers in confronting the way these cultural disjunctions are local manifestations of higher level tensions among the rhetorical strategies by which society thinks about mental illness and health care. acknowledgements no hermeneutic work belongs wholly to its author, and i wish to acknowledge dr. shelley raffin-bouchal, my doctoral supervisor, and dr. nancy moules, who was a very active member of my supervisory committee, for all their guidance and support in conducting the study from which this paper emerged. a version of this paper was presented by the author at the canadian hermeneutic institute, halifax, nova scotia, may 23, 2012. mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 16 references aho, k. (2008). medicalizing mental health: a phenomenological alternative. journal of medical humanities, 29, 243-259. doi: 10.1007/s10912-008-9065-1 american psychiatric association (2000). diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). washington, dc: author. barker, p., & buchanan-barker, p. (2005). the tidal model: a guide for mental health professionals. new york, ny: brunnerroutledge. bell, c. (2009a). ritual theory, ritual practice. new york, ny: oxford. bell, c. (2009b). ritual: perspective and dimensions. new york, ny: oxford. benner, p. (1984). from novice to expert. menlo park, ca: addison-wesley. benner, p. (2000). the wisdom of our practice. american journal of nursing, 100(10), 99-105. clarke, l. (2009). the care and confinement of the mentally ill. in p. barker (ed.), psychiatric and mental health nursing: the craft of caring. london, uk: hodder arnold. dogen. (2010). treasury of the true dharma eye: zen master dogen’s shobogenzo (k. tanahashi, trans.). boston, ma: shambhala. faure, b. (2004). double exposure: cutting across buddhist and western discourses. stanford, ca: stanford university press. gadamer, h.g. (2001). gadamer in conversation: reflections and commentary. new haven, ct: yale university press. mccaffrey, g., raffin-bouchal, s., & moules, n.j. (2012a). buddhist thought and nursing: a hermeneutic exploration. nursing philosophy, 13(2), 87-97.doi:10.1111/j.1466 769x. 20 11.00502.x mccaffrey, g., raffin-bouchal, s., & moules, n.j. (2012b). hermeneutics as research approach: a reappraisal. international journal of qualitative methods, 11(3), 214-229. o’gorman, s.m. (1998). death and dying in contemporary society: an evaluation of current attitudes and the rituals associated with death and dying and their relevance to recent understandings of health and healing. journal of advanced nursing, 27(6), 1127-1135. palmer, r. e. (2001). introduction. in h. g. gadamer, gadamer in conversation: reflections and commentary (r.e. palmer, trans.). new haven, ct: yale university press. peplau, h. (1988). interpersonal relations in nursing. basingstoke, uk: palgrave macmillan. peplau, h. (1989). selected works: interpersonal theory in nursing. new york, ny: macmillan. philpin, s. (2002). rituals and nursing: a critical commentary. journal of advanced nursing, 38(2), 144-151. philpin, s. (2007). managing ambiguity and danger in an intensive therapy unit: ritual practices and sequestration. nursing inquiry, 14(1), 51-59. doi:10.1111/ j.1440-1800.2007. 00354.x tanahashi, k. (1995). moon in a dewdrop: writings of zen master dogen. new york, ny: north point press. mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 12 17 wright, d.s. (2008). introduction: rethinking ritual practice in zen buddhism. in s. heine & d.s. wright (eds.), zen ritual: studies of zen buddhist theory in practice. new york, ny: oxford. corresponding author: harris b. bechtol, phd sam houston state university email: hbb014@shsu.edu journal of applied hermeneutics march 20, 2017 the author(s) 2017 a hermeneutic phenomenology: the death of the other understood as event harris b. bechtol abstract this is a phenomenological description of what is happening when we experience the death of another that interprets surviving or living on after such death by employing the term event. this term of art from phenomenology and hermeneutics is used to describe a disruptive and transformative experience of singularity. i maintain that the death of the other is an experience of an event because such death is unpredictable or without a horizon of expectation, excessive or without any principle of sufficient reason, and transformative or a death of the world itself. keywords death, mourning, the other, event, phenomenology, derrida and you, o tree, whose branches already are casting their shadows on one poor body and soon will be overshadowing two, preserve the marks of our death; let your fruit forever be dark as a token of mourning, a monument marking the blood of two lovers. (ovid, 2004, 4.157-161) poetry, literature, and art in general have a unique ability to expose us to common experiences so that we see the heart of these experiences as we live them out in everyday life. art can function as a mirror of our deepest philosophical concerns by highlighting our average, everyday understanding of phenomena. though classified under myth, ovid’s account of how the mulberry tree came to bear red instead of white berries functions in just this way. he shows in the tragic love of thisbe and pyramus how the death of a loved one is carried by the world itself through the world’s own metamorphosis. death and world remain integrally bound so that the bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 2 loss of someone changes the world itself. this understanding of the relation between world and death at the turn of the first century is also part of today’s popular culture. the recent netflix series daredevil reflects back to us this average, everyday understanding of the transformative potentiality of the death of the other. when the questionable character, elliot grote, is killed by the marvel anti-hero the punisher, only three characters attend grote’s funeral: his legal representatives. father lantom, the priest presiding over the funeral, elaborates on this experience of death by highlighting this loss as more than just the loss of the person: “precious in the eyes of the lord is the death of his saints.” well, elliot grote was no saint. he was human—deeply flawed. every sunday, for as far as i remember, elliot would come here friendless and alone to sit right there in that pew. often, i would see him take whatever money he had—crumpled one hundreds, loose change, a rolex watch one time—and put it in the collection plate hoping for redemption, which would never come. praying for the light, but elliot died still in the dark with no one to mourn his loss except the three of you. and so, we might say one life gone, one sinful life, but one person is not just one person. in each of us, there is a world webbing out, reaching others. creating reactions. sometimes equal sometimes opposite. we rush to say one life gone, but each of us is a world. and today, a world has been lost [emphasis added]. (kelly, 2015) despite art’s ability to reflect back and highlight such experiences, it often does little to take us beyond their singularity. in a deeply important sense, any death is each time unique—chaque fois unique as jacques derrida says—so that any death is always already an experience of singularity that resists universalization. and yet such an experience of singularity to which art can expose us does not resist philosophical engagement. engaging such singular experiences philosophically requires that a way, path, or method be chosen that seeks neither to universalize nor exhaustively explain these experiences. undoubtedly, philosophy is wont to seek after the universal and the exhaustive, but this is not philosophy’s only concern. phenomenology and hermeneutics provide this way or path for philosophically engaging the death of the other in its singularity but without attempting to universalize the singular. through a phenomenological description of what happens when we survive, that is, live-on after, sur-vivre, the death of the other, we can provide the contours of and offer an interpretation of such an experience of singularity. the death of the other is, then, each time unique, but the repetition of such a common event allows us to describe some of the crucial and abiding structures of these events. each time unique, then, can be read as repetition of the same but always with a difference. this phenomenological description of surviving the death of the other offers an understanding of the relation of death and the world. by deploying event as a term of art from phenomenology and hermeneutics, i limn the lines around the abiding structures of an experience of the death of the other by providing an understanding of what happens when we live on after such death. with this description, the relation among death and the world begins to be understood insofar as the death of the other is more than just the loss of the person but also the loss of the meaningful contexts in which we find ourselves. in other words, the death of the other is a death of the world. 1 this 1 here, and throughout, i draw from jacques derrida’s insistence, “for each time, and each time singularly, each time irreplaceably, each time infinitely, death is nothing less than an end of the world” (sovereignties in question: the poetics of paul celan, ed. thomas dutoit and outi pasanen [new york: bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 3 phenomenological account provides an understanding of the transformative and disruptive potentiality of the event of the death of the other on account of its unexpectedness, its excess, and its transformation of the world in its happening. symptoms of an event: unexpected, excessive, and transformative considering that this description of the death of the other relies on the term event, understanding the symptoms of an event is necessary so that the importance of the description’s contours may come into full relief. the event as a term of art became popular around the middle of the twentieth century when philosophers in phenomenology and hermeneutics began exploring ontologies outside of traditional substance metaphysics, which many believe emphasizes the mastery of the human subject over the objects that stand over against it. substance metaphysical approaches, according to these philosophers, have been unable to engage with the most important aspects of life and being, which can be gathered under the heading of degrees or modes of givenness (marion, 2002a; gschwandtner, 2014). these philosophers are concerned with whatever exceeds the conceptual and linguistic horizons of subjectivity by either an excess of givenness or a givenness of recess. the name offered for such givenness is the event. yet the diverse group of philosophers concerned with such an event2 provides no universal definition that would capture the nature of an event. as jean-luc nancy (2000) aptly says, “[t]here is no event ‘as such’” (p. 169). nancy and others resist any definition of an event because an event is understood to be an experience of possibility, contingency, and singularity itself. all we ever have in terms of our experience of an event are our experiences of particular events. we can have many experiences of events, in this sense, but we never experience the event as such. thus, no universal, transcendent form of the event exists. only a plurality of singular events exists. attempts to universalize the singularity of any event are, then, resisted by these philosophers of the event. nevertheless, these philosophers often use similar language to describe what experiencing an event entails. for example, an event for these philosophers concerns a transformative moment when the “unexpected and unpredictable [disrupt] the normalized, neutralized, and forcibly pacified status quo” (zabala & marder, 2014, p. 9). and this disruption of a “singular occurrence” introduces “an element to our world or our situation that could not have been thought or predicated in advance and that, as soon as it has arrived, reconstitutes the previous relations between beings in a world because it interposes itself among them. thus, it changes and reconfigures the world” (van der heiden, 2014, p. 17). consequently, an experience of an event fordham university press, 2005, p. 140] emphasis mine). on the strange arithmetic of this phrase where each death is a death of the one world, see not only below but also harris b. bechtol “event, death, and poetry: the death of the other as event,” philosophy today (forthcoming) and dennis schmidt, “of birth, death, and unfinished conversations” in gadamer’s hermeneutics and the art of conversation, ed. andrzej wiercinski. 2 this group includes, but is not limited to, martin heidegger, especially his work from the mid 1930s where he focuses on das ereignis (the event) in conjunction with his career-long task of thinking the truth of being, along with the french reception of heidegger’s work by gilles deleuze, alain badiou, jacques derrida, jean-luc nancy, jean-luc marion, françoise dastur, and claude romano. in addition, john d. caputo’s recent work has made this topic popular for english speakers interested in continental philosophy. bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 4 has a “symptomatology” (derrida, 2001, p.105): we know when an event has disrupted the norms of everyday life because such a disruption carries common symptoms with it. with this, derrida’s own writing on events can be used to represent this largely agreed upon structure of an event as unexpected, excessive, and transformative. derrida enumerates numerous aspects of our experiences of events: surprise, exposure, unanticipatable (inanticipable), unforeseeable, without horizon, unpredictable, unplanned, not decided upon, unexpected, singular, impossible, and secretive. we can summarize many of these themes in his work under three major aspects: impossibility, secrecy, and symptomatology. the impossibility of an event acts as the condition from which the other aspects flow. for derrida says, “this experience of the impossible conditions the eventiality of the event [conditionne l’événementialité de l’événement] …. what happens, as event, can only happen there where it is impossible” (derrida, 2001, p. 96). he does not mean that an event is a logical impossibility. rather, the condition of an event’s possibility is found only in its phenomenological impossibility, that is, there where the occurrence of an event, the breaking in of an event into the status quo, does not accord with our horizons of expectation for an experience. an event is impossible in this sense because it is unanticipatable: its occurrence exceeds or even resists our horizons of expectation through which phenomena ordinarily occur for us. an event suddenly breaks in and surprises us because it cannot be seen according to these horizons of expectation. thus, derrida (2001) says that we must speak of “the im-possible event” where the hyphenation of this word indicates “not only the opposite of the possible” but also “the condition or the chance of the possible” (p. 101). this im-possible event is not, however, “inaccessible” because it still “announces itself … swoops down upon and seizes me here and now … in actuality and not potentiality …. it is what is most undeniably real” (derrida, 2005, p. 84). an event is possible there where it finds its limit in our various conceptual and linguistic horizons of rationality through which life becomes relatively predictable and stable. yet this does not mean that an event never occurs. rather, when an event arrives, its arrival disrupts the relative predictability and stability of everyday life. an event remains phenomenologically impossible to our expectations and known possibilities all the while bringing its own possibilities through which it appears. thus, derrida (2006) says, “it may be, then, that the order [of the event] is other … and that only the coming of the event allows, after the event, perhaps, what it will previously have made possible to be thought” (p. 18). only after an event can we then begin to think what this event has made possible on account of the new conditions of possibility that attend its arrival. with its possibility found in its impossibility, derrida points us to the second major aspect of an event: secrecy. an event is secret not insofar as it is hidden or clandestine but insofar as it “does not appear” (p. 105) in the way that we expect other phenomena to appear (derrida, 2001). as a phenomenological im-possibility, this non-appearance of an event removes it from any principle of sufficient reason or search for universal knowledge about the event. as such, an event remains “unexplainable by a system of efficient causes” (derrida, 1992, p. 106) because such a system belongs to our horizons of expectation through which life becomes relatively stable. accordingly, derrida (2001) says that if we can define an event with “one possible definition” it would be that “an event must be exceptional, without rule” (p. 106). an event obeys no rules or principles unless those principles are “principles of disorder, that is, principles without principles” (derrida, 1992, p. 123). considering that an event’s occurrence exceeds or resists our horizons of bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 5 expectation, the principles of its occurrence must be principles of disorder because its appearance disrupts our conditions of possibility for an experience. consequently, an event is an experience of the other that resists the hegemony of subjectivity. derrida utilizes this notion of the secret as a “way to let the other be, to respect alterity” (caputo, 1997, p. 180). an event as other can happen in the realm of the same, the realm of phenomenology, but when it happens there, it does not appear according to our expected principles for phenomena. it irrupts into the same as the other. thus, an event is irreducible to our phenomenological horizons that it interrupts and keeps open. it, then, appears without appearing. it shows up according to its own order or conditions of possibility and not our own. it appears as the correlate of an intention that cannot confine it. it surprises and exceeds us. as such, an event is a secret. for this reason, derrida insists that an event is also symptomatological. he uses this term not in any clinical or psychoanalytic sense. rather, he says that “this notion of symptom” (p. 105) comes from what he thinks about “verticality” (derrida, 2001). the arrival of an event is an arrival that “falls on me” (derrida, 2001, p. 97). he insists “on the verticality of this matter because the surprise can only come from on high” (derrida, 2001, p. 97). without this verticality, we could see an event coming on the horizon. we could expect an event. but, as we have seen, an event is precisely that which surprises and that which is an exception or without law. t hus, the symptomatology of an event suggests that an event’s arrival “can only give rise [donner lieu à] to symptoms” (p. 106) that befall us after the event’s occurrence (derrida, 2001). an event manifests itself only in symptoms: without horizon, surprising, unexpected, aleatory, excessive, transformative, etc. thus, if an event comes, a technological invention or a gift of forgiveness, for instance, it happens as a singular surprise, as “always exceptional” and “without rule” (derrida, 2001, p. 106). through its exceptional happening, an event as other enters phenomenality with a kind of “transcendental violence” (derrida, 1978, p. 123). 3 an event arrives in such a way that we can say something about the symptoms that have befallen us with its arrival. yet at the same time, an event arrives without arriving. the event still remains other and, thereby, secret and im-possible. while derrida’s work has proved helpful in understanding the largely agreed upon symptoms of an event, important differences in the philosophical approaches to the event remain. one such difference concerns the contrasting temporalities of an event: “following the event” and “awaiting the event in its imminence” (van der heiden, 2014, p. 137). some figures, for example, alain badiou, jean-luc marion, and claude romano, orient the temporality of an event around a past occurrence whose givenness causes us to return repeatedly to this occurrence in an effort to understand and mine its depths. consequently, these philosophers use birth as their primary figuration of an event. marion claims, for example, that i continually aim at my own birth “intentionally” by “wanting to know who and from where i am, undertaking research into my 3 here i am drawing on derrida’s account of transcendental violence in his essay “violence and metaphysics.” using husserl, he critiques levinas by saying, “[i]t is impossible to encounter the alter ego … impossible to respect it in experience and in language, if this other, in its alterity, does not appear for an ego (in general)” (p. 123). alterity, the other, must appear in the same, in phenomenality, for us to have any relation with or recognition of this other. yet such an appearance of the other in the same “in which the other appears as other, and lends itself to language … is perhaps to give oneself over to violence … an original, transcendental violence, previous to every ethical choice” (p. 125). bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 6 identity” (marion, 2002, p. 42). our life is “solely occupied … with reconstituting [our birth], attributing to it a meaning and responding to its silent appeal” (marion, 2002, p. 42). and yet other figures, such as martin heidegger, emmanuel levinas, jacques derrida, and jeanluc nancy, orient the temporality of an event around the advent of what is to come. death has, consequently, become an important figuration of an event for these philosophers. 4 yet the predominant approach to death has been through personal death or personal mortality. since at least plato, the history of philosophy has been preoccupied with the death of the self or one’s own death. heidegger’s existential analytic of dasein’s being-toward-death in being and time— where he argues that anxiety over one’s own death is our originary experience of death that exposes us to our own being, our relation to temporality, and our responsibility to become a self—has made this focus on our own death especially important. adhering to heidegger’s analysis, one’s own death can be understood as an event because our anticipation of this end engenders new interpretations of our being and of the meaning or being of things around us (polt, 2014). however, not until the works of levinas and derrida has this focus on our own death found important philosophical objection. they agree that our own death is not the most fundamental experience of death because the death of the other is more fundamental. as levinas (2000) says, “the death of the other: therein lies the first death” (p. 43). and they each maintain that the self is constituted first and foremost through its responsibility to the other. consequently, the death of the other is the “more originary experience” of death because it “institutes responsibility … in the ethical dimension of sacrifice” (derrida, 2008, p. 48).5 my “right to be” a self, then, “is already my responsibility for the death of the other” (levinas, 1989, p. 86). what remains to be done in this history of the event and its relation to death is to provide a phenomenology of the death of the other, in particular, that helps to understand this ordinary experience as an event. such a description would offer an account according to the symptoms of an event. consequently, the following describes the unexpected, im-possible arrival of the death of the other, the excessiveness of this arrival beyond our conceptual and linguistic horizons of rationality, and its transformative potentiality. the symptoms of the death of the other if the death of the other is an event, it must arrive without our ability to be ready for it. the death of the other must be an unexpected occurrence. this unpredictability is rather obvious in the case of tragic deaths. when parents must live on after the death of their own child, they are “experiencing the unimaginable and never expected experience of being a bereaved parent” bright et al., 2015, p. 1). as a bereaved parent, the natural flow of life has been brought to a halt: children are supposed to bury their parents—not the other way around. the natural flow of one 4 nancy does, however, admit, “in a birth or in a death—examples which are not examples, but more than examples; they are the thing itself—there is the event, some[thing] awaited, something that might have been able to be” (p. 167). 5 cf. derrida’s criticism of heidegger’s analysis of being-toward-death in aporias where he says, “[m]an, or man as dasein, never has a relation to death as such, but only to [the] perishing [of animals], to [our own] demising, and to the death of the other …. the death of the other thus becomes again ‘first,’ always first …. the death of the other, this death of the other in ‘me’ [in the experience of mourning], is fundamentally the only death that is named in the syntagm ‘my death’” (1993, p. 76). bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 7 generation to the next has unexpectedly been reversed. when lori and brian mcdermott lost their twenty-one year old daughter, maia, to a car accident, they comment that their past experiences of losing their own parents, grandparents, uncles, and cousins “provided little preparation for what [they] were now experiencing” (mcdermott & mcdermott, 2011, p. 12). the tragic loss of their child was unexpected and surprising, and their past experiences of death could not prepare them for this singular event. thus, we can say that sudden deaths surprise us because we did not see them coming, literally, and we could not have imagined them happening and especially in the way that they happened. however, the more planned, predicted, or imminent deaths of the other seem problematic. these deaths do not seem to be unpredictable, especially when we consider the instances of death where the other plans her own death on a particular date—as brittany maynard did on november 1, 2014—or when a doctor declares that a patient has a limited number of months left to live. this important difference between different ways that the other dies notwithstanding, all deaths of the other, even if imminent, remain unpredictable. after all, the focus with the death of the other is as much about the inception of this event when the other dies as it is about living on after this death, that is, surviving the other. whether the loss of the other was sudden or expected, one factical element pervades all of these experiences: those who survive the death of the other must live on in the world without this other. and this experience of survival is always unexpected because we can never be prepared for how the loss of the meaningfulness of things in our worlds will touch us after the other is gone. we can see from this experience the integral connection among the unexpectedness of the death of the other and its transformative nature. before turning to the latter directly, understanding the excessiveness of the death of the other will help us more fully appreciate its transformative potentiality. if the death of the other is an event, it must not only arrive unexpectedly but also excessively so. the arrival of the death of the other is excessive because it exceeds our conceptual and linguistic horizons of rationality. no matter how much factual information a person may have about when and how the other has died, the survivor continually comes back to the question, in one form or another, of why the other has died. in the wake of maia’s death, the mcdermotts express that “there is no reason for a loss that hurts this much” (mcdermott & mcdermott, 2011, p. 96). when tommy givens, “a baptist pastor’s kid, lifelong christian, former missionary and seminary professor,” survived his father’s death from lou gehrig’s disease, he describes his experience in this way: everything was the same, and yet his father was gone …. [tommy] stood in his parents’ living room where his father had just died—and wondered what to do next. ‘we were groping for what might help us navigate something very profound,’ [tommy] recalled, ‘something that would shape us for the rest of our lives.’ (thompson, 2015, pp. 23-24) regardless of the answers that tommy’s own faith had to offer him in this experience, he continued to grope for something that would make sense of it. belief in seeing the deceased again in the afterlife may assuage some worries in the survivor, but this belief does not help explain why the other has been lost. no exhaustive account or reasonable explanation placates the trauma and pain that accompanies this loss. even jesus, whom christianity claims to be both human and god and would, thereby, know the bliss that one of his followers would experience in bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 8 the afterlife, weeps when his friend lazarus dies. the death of the other resists any principle of sufficient reason, that is, resists this horizon of expectation as to why the other has died. we may certainly know what caused the death: heart failure, cancer, overdose, respiratory failure, etc. often these medical explanations can alleviate some of the pain, but none of nor all of them can cause us to stop asking why the other has died. these sufficient reasons cannot explain away the grief, pain, and trauma of this loss. suddenly, the survivors find themselves in the world of voltaire’s (1950) candide where the principle of sufficient reason has been reduced to a “pitiable state” (p. 29) unable to explain why this state of affairs “is for the best in this world” (p. 43).6 one phenomenological footprint for this excessiveness of the death of the other is the cyclical nature of the mourning or grieving process. we repeatedly return to the death of the other, perhaps even to its inception at the passage from life to corpse, in an effort to mine the depths of this event. yet we cannot reason our way through this event as evidenced by repeatedly living through and beyond this moment itself in our work of mourning. the death of the other is a traumatic event that, as such, “is not remembered per se, but recurringly relived” (jones, 2014, p. 141).7 the experience of the death of the other is relived “‘belatedly’ in the form of intrusive and uncontrollable flashbacks” (jones, 2014, p. 152). the survivors of the death remain unable “to integrate the experience into ordinary systems of personal history and meaning” because this trauma “short-circuits” the brain (jones, 2014, p. 151). the event “remain[s] stuck and never gain[s] access to the frontal lobes [of the brain], which is not only where language arises but is also the part of the brain that reasons and understands” (jones, 2014, p. 151). thus, we often hear from survivors who have lost loved ones that they cannot believe he or she is gone. they are struck by the reality of the other’s absence, by this absence’s facticity, but they fail to “‘believe in it,’ or say what it is” (jones, 2014, p. 152). consequently, these survivors tell and retell the story of the death of the other along with the stories about the life lived by the other who has been lost. the survivors find themselves mourning the loss of the other but unable to work fully through this loss. their past loss continues to haunt their present. thus, their work of mourning remains workless. as workless, their mourning is a negotiation between moving completely beyond their loss, in a sense forgetting the other who has been lost by interiorizing the other in their own memory, and what freud calls melancholia, that is, never coming to terms with the death of the other. derrida (2005b) maintains, in this regard, that a “certain melancholy must still protest against normal mourning” (p. 160) because the other as other can never be interiorized or appropriated to the subjectivity of the survivor. in the mcdermotts’ mourning of their daughter’s death, their mourning remains workless because “finding the balance between the ‘old normal’ and the ‘new normal’ would probably be a constant challenge forever more” (mcdermott & mcdermott, 2011). this cyclical, workless nature of mourning is a process that attempts to appropriate the unexpected loss of meaning or the unexpected absence made present in the world when the other dies. yet this appropriation always fails on account of the excessiveness of this loss beyond our reasoning and explanatory capacities. 6 exceptions to this might be when the deceased was a terrible person who mistreated or even abused those around him or her. in these cases, we might think that the death of such an other engenders a state of affairs that is for the best in the world. though this might be an exception, such a death would still come unexpectedly and be transformative of the world. 7 while jones’s account of trauma fits nicely here with this description of the death of the other as an event, she does not associate the trauma of the death of the other with this term of art event. bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 9 if the death of the other is an event, it must not only arrive unexpectedly and excessively but also with transformative, disruptive potentiality. when this event occurs, it transforms our meaningful contexts that have been constituted in relation to the other. in this transformation, we experience the death of the other as more than just the loss of the person because it is also a loss of the world. it is a death of the world. here the term world is understood phenomenologically as the context in which things and others have their particular meanings on account of the bequest of history, heritage, and tradition. thus, the world is understood as the meaningful contexts in which we find ourselves. while the earth on which we all live can be described as a world in this sense, this one world or context of meaning that we all share is at the same time many worlds. 8 thus, in life we find ourselves in many worlds in which things and people have meaning: home, work, the university, the study, the classroom, etc. and the constitution of these worlds, as both heidegger but more importantly nancy maintain, occurs always with the others with whom we are in relation. drawing on this understanding of the with-world or the world as co-constituted with others, the event of the death of the other not only shows us, often for the first time, that our worlds are always with-worlds but also marks our with-worlds with an absence of meaning or a givenness of recess. the death of the other, then, discloses both the birth of the world as a withworld and an end of the world. consequently, when the other dies, his or her absence is given to us or made present to us especially when we return to those places that mean the most to us on account of the moments we have shared in these spaces with the one who is now dead. the meaninglessness that attends the things in our world afterwards indicates how the death of the other is both an end of the world but also an origin of the world (derrida, 2005b).9 for example, when a loved one dies and you visit what used to be your (plural) favorite restaurant, now that he or she is dead, everything seems off, uncomfortable, or strange. “it just doesn’t feel the same without him/her,” we often hear from people in these situations. the food, though it is the same chef, ingredients, dish, and recipe, may even taste different. this alteration arises on account of the absence of the other that is made present at the restaurant. moreover, how often do we hear of a person or family moving houses after a husband, wife, partner, or child dies? the absence of the other is so present that it can become deafening in the house, making the house almost uninhabitable. when what we love is lacking, [t]he one who loves sees the world only through the absence of what he loves, and this absence … flows back on the entire world …. [t]he world has not disappeared; it remains present … but this disappearance [of what is loved] nevertheless strikes the appearance of the world with vanity. (marion, 1991, p. 136) the mcdermotts’ evidence this death of the world marked by the vanity or meaninglessness of things in their own experience of the death of their daughter. they describe this death as a 8 the german die umwelt captures this sense of world nicely because it denotes the world (welt) surrounding (um-) us. 9 here, i am drawing from and elaborating on derrida’s insight about how one of paul celan’s poems, “rams,” which concerns the death of the other, “says the world, the origin and the history of the world … how the world was conceived, how it is born and straightaway is no longer” (sovereignties in question, p. 162). bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 10 “shattering [of] our world” (p. ix) in which they have been “left behind … to adjust and find meaning” (p. xiii) in “a most unwelcome new world” (mcdermott & mcdermott, 2011, p. 3). after their loss on february 20th, they awoke to “a totally upended world” (p. 2) that they name “the post-220 world” (p. 27) and “the post-220 journey” (p. 35) (mcdermott & mcermott, 2011). but when they return to maia’s room and experience the presence of her absence through the things in her room, they recognize in this not only the end but also the birth of their world: when we opened the door and saw all of her things arranged as if in a state of permanent suspended animation, tears fell from our eyes and our hearts filled with sorrow. the still incomprehensible reality of it all hit us again: maia’s not coming back to finish reading that book by the bed, or go to the next class on her schedule, or use her computer to send us an email, or cuddle with all those pillows. (mcdermott & mcdermott, 2011, p. 28) they recognize that the book, the computer, the pillows, and the entire room has, or is, the meaning that it has on account of their relation with maia through these things. the mcdermotts recognize that “[d]eath sets a thing significant” (dickinson, 2013, p. 93) because, often, only when the other has been lost, do we then recognize that things like a book, computer, or pillows in a world have the meaning or significance that they have on account of the relation of these things with the one who has died. only then do we recognize the birth of the world as a withworld at the death of the world. the meaningful context of maia’s room and all of the things in it was co-constituted with maia—it is a with-world. however, with maia’s death, the meaningfulness of this with-world has been lost. her death marks a death of this world so that when they experience this post-220 world, they are experiencing the presence of maia’s absence through the recess of meaning or the meaninglessness of the things in their with-world without maia. in a sense not unlike the transformation of the mulberry tree in ovid’s poem, this absence made present in the world after the death of the other is a token of mourning that the world itself carries in the wake of the death of the other. to experience the death of the other, to undergo this event, is to survive a death of the world, and this survival, as we can see, extends beyond the moment in which the person is actually lost. consequently, this description of the death of the other shows that this event is not readily reducible to an inaccessible instant of passage from life to death but includes living on after the other is gone. the death of the other includes the aftermath, the shock, and the grieving of the loss of the person as well as the loss of what the world has meant to and with that person. the death of the other includes the grieving of a death of the world. after all, this loss of the world with the other is happening; for instance, in the instant that the funeral is being prepared and happening or tours of new houses are being given. thus, when the death of the other happens, occurs, breaks in, interrupts, or disrupts, it marks a transformation of the world. the pre-event world and the post-event world are radically different insofar as the meaning of the world, the world itself, has been lost. a “new order of [the] world” is at play when the other dies (bright et al., 2013, p. 6). therefore, when a husband, wife, partner, or child dies, those who survive this person often move houses because the presence of the other’s absence is suffocating now that the survivor of the other must carry on life in the house that he or she helped establish as the home, as one of the worlds for the family. for the loss that is experienced is the loss of what the world had meant to that person and what the world had meant to us, or to a group, on account of our relation with the now deceased. the being-with of the restaurant, the food, the house, etc. bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 11 includes the now dead other. so when we revisit those places where he or she used to be or that meant this or that to us on account of that person, we experience this absence, this token of mourning. the event of the death of the other transforms everything because the world means differently, worlds differently, in the aftermath or in the event of death. one of the most profound ways that the world worlds differently concerns the effect of the other’s death on the foundation of our temporal existence. certainly the death of the other is recorded as having taken place at a particular, temporal moment or now point: “the estimated time of death was…” “she was pronounced dead at…” time of death is codified on the death certificate. but the phenomenon of the death of the other as a whole is both inside time in this way while also outside of time. this death operates outside of time because in disrupting the world, this event solicits or shakes the foundations of our experience of temporality. on the one hand, the event of the death of the other “ruins everything, all the while leaving everything intact” (blanchot, 1986, p. 1). death simultaneously ruins the world while leaving life intact. despite the fact that we may have just lost a loved one, a friend, a neighbor, a beloved pet, a mentor, god, etc., life continues as usual: the sun continues to rise, the weather continues t o change, and work must still be done. as the mcdermotts (2011) put it, “[t]he post-220 world still retained the entire pre-220 work world” (p. 35). when life seems like it should stop on account of the loss that has happened, life continues despite the death that marks a death of the world. life goes on in a way that “the new normal” becomes “facing the realities of life without” the other who has died (bright et al., 2015, p. 7). moreover, we now have myriad questions and problems to deal with: who’s the next of kin that we need to call? when will the funeral be? what do we do with the body: cremation or burial? what kind of music at the funeral? who will speak at the memorial? what about her car? how will the department recover from this? who will grade his students’ papers? am i ok? should i see a therapist? life continues intact but am i intact? will i recover? in fact, the wholeness of the self of those who survive this event may precisely be unwhole, incomplete, or fractured. death ruins everything, all the while leaving everything intact. death may leave everything intact but only in some incomplete way. we seek closure over the death of the other but, perhaps, we are never “to have closure over such an event and perhaps we do not even want it” (bright et al, 2015, p. 8). perhaps, the closure we seek when the other dies remains a lack of closure. such a lack could be a recognition that our mourning is workless. or, perhaps, this lack of closure could result from the reality that someone might be irrevocably ruined, driven mad, driven to his or her own end because of the death of the other. this is always a possibility. after all, one of the things for which we can never be ready is how the death of the world that attends the death of the other, which almost just is the death of the other, will touch us. consequently, the death of the other in its ruination of the world may be a surprise or something we did not see coming. “she was too young to die.” “we all knew he wasn’t in good health, but i still cannot believe he is gone.” “it just doesn’t make sense.” or simply, “why?” beyond this surprise of the event in its happening, the way in which everything is left intact may even surprise us. the alarm-clock goes off one morning months after she is gone and the first thought from the survivor is, “another day? do i really have to get up? why am i still like this?” thus, the restitution after the event of the death of the other may be a tragic one. and it may not be. both are always live options here because we are dealing with an irruption of singularity and contingency, that is, with an event. the rupture of the world surprises us. the continuation of life after this death surprises us. moreover, the rupture surprises in the bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 12 instant that the restitution surprises us. the death of the world with the other is taking place in the instant that we plan the funeral, look for a new house, distribute his students’ papers to be graded, visit our favorite restaurant for the first time post-event, etc. consequently, the rupture and restitution of the world after the event bleed into one another, overlap one another, or instantly take place with one another. the moment of the loss of the other, the inception of the event, becomes a past that will not stay put. this past moment of the event has returned, come again—revenir—like a specter or revenant come to haunt the present. and in its haunting, on the other hand, we are reminded not only of the loss of the other and the loss of the meaningfulness that attended our relation with her but also of the loss of the future. as the mcdermotts (2011) attest, “[i]t is now time to emerge and face a totally upended world and a future that had shifted 180 degrees [emphasis added]” (p. 25). the possibilities that we once hoped for in relation with the other are now no more. such possibilities are, as futural, constituted by their absence that we hope one day will become actual and present. but now that hope for the actualization of these possibilities is lost itself thereby re-doubling the absence that constitutes them. therefore, our temporal existence after this event of the death of the other is thoroughly out of joint (shakespeare & hubler, 1987). the present remains haunted by a past that draws us back to the moment of the inception of this event. and yet this past continually returns or comes again as if from the future because “the specter is the future, it is always to come, it presents itself only as that which could come or come back” (derrida, 1994, p. 48). moreover, the present is riddled with the absence of future possibilities once hoped for but now lost or gone with the death of the other. our experience of temporality is thoroughly solicited, fractured, and shaken by this unexpected and excessive event to the extent that the world, the with-world, we still share after this event will never be the same. the world may still be present but its presence is felt as the absence of the other who has died. such is this tremendous, monstrous, or ungeheuer event of the death of the other. acknowledgements i would like to thank my dissertation director, dr. theodore george, for helping me craft the major project out of which this piece has developed. also, many thanks go to billy daniel for reading an early draft of this paper and helping me develop my ideas further. lastly, i would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers who offered comments and suggestions on my paper. their comments helped me improve my writing style as well as clarify the overall argument of the paper. references bechtol, h.b. (in press). event, death, and poetry: the death of the other as event. philosophy today. blanchot, m. (1986). the writing of the disaster (a. smock, trans.). lincoln, nb: university of nebraska press. bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 13 bright, k., brockway, m., carrera, g., kathol, b., keys, e., moules, n. j., … virani, a. (2015). out of order: to debbie and dave, chris and bill, mj and john. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 4, 1-10. retrieved from http://jah. journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/ article/view/92 caputo, j. d. (1997). the prayers and tears of jacques derrida: religion without religion. bloomington, in: indiana university press. derrida, j. (1978). writing and difference (a. bass, trans.). chicago, il: the university of chicago press. derrida, j. (1992). given time: 1 counterfeit money (p. kamuf, trans.). chicago, il: the university of chicago press. derrida, j. (1993). aporias (t. dutoit, trans.). stanford, ca: stanford university press. derrida, j. (1994). specters of marx. (p. kamuf, trans.). new york, ny: routledge. derrida, j. (2001). une certaine possibilité impossible de dire l’événement. in g. soussana, a. nouss, & j. derrida (eds.), dire l’événement, est-ce possible? seminaire de montréal, pour jacques derrida (pp. 79-112). derrida, j. (2005a). rogues: two essays on reason (p.a. brault & m. naas, trans.). stanford, ca: stanford university press. derrida, j. (2005b). sovereignties in question: the poetics of paul celan (t. dutoit & o. pasanen, eds.). new york, ny: fordham university press. derrida, j. (2006). the politics of friendship (g. collins, trans.). new york, ny: verso. derrida, j. (2008). the gift of death (2nd ed.; d. wills, trans.). chicago, il: the university of chicago press. dickinson, e. (2013). death sets a thing significant. in r. kick (ed.), death poems (pp. 93). san francisco, ca: disinformation books. gschwandtner, c. (2014). degrees of givenness: on saturation in jean-luc marion. bloomington, in: indiana university press. jones, t. (2014). traumatized subjects: continental philosophy of religion and the ethics of alterity. the journal of religion, 94(2), 143-160. doi: 10.1086/674952 kelly, j. c. (writer), & hoar, p. (director). (2015). penny and dime (television series episode). in k. johnston (producer), daredevil. new york, ny: marvel television. http://jah/ bechtol journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 6 14 levinas, e. (1989). ethics as first philosophy. in s. hand (ed.), the levinas reader (pp. 75-87). cambridge, ma: basil blackwell. levinas, e. (2000). god, death, and time (b. bergo, trans,). stanford, ca: stanford university press. marion, j.l. (1991). god without being: hors-text. (t. a. carlson, trans.). chicago, il: the university of chicago press. marion, j.l. (2002a). being given: toward a phenomenology of givennes. (j. l. kosky, trans.). stanford, ca: stanford university press. marion, j.l. (2002b). in excess: studies of saturated phenomena (r. horner & v. berraud, trans.). new york, ny: fordham university press. mcdermott, l., & mcdermott, d. (2011). learning to dane in the rain: a true story about life beyond death. bloomington, in: balboa press. nancy, j.l. (2000). being singular plural (r. d. richardson & a. e. o’byrne, trans.). stanford, ca: stanford. ovid & martin, c. (2004). metamorphoses (d. raeburn, trans.). new york, ny: penguin. polt, r. (2014). traumatic ontology. in m. marder & s. zabala (eds.), being shaken ontology and the event (pp. 19-40). new york, ny: palgrave macmillan. shakespeare, w., & hubler, e. (1987). the tragedy of hamlet, prince of denmark. new york, n.y: penguin. schmidt, d. (2011). of birth, death, and unfinished conversations. in a. wiercinski (ed.), gadamer’s hermeneutics and the art of conversation (pp. 107-114). piscataway, nj: transaction. thompson, j.n. (2015). to live and die well. fuller magazine, 2, 23-25. retrieved from http://joynetanyathompson.com/2015/03/23/to-live-and-die-well-fuller-magazine/ van der heiden, g. j. (2014). ontology after ontotheology: plurality, event, and contingency in contemporary philosophy. pittsburgh, pa: duquesne university press. voltaire (1950). candide, or, optimism (j. butt, trans.). new york, ny: penguin classics. zabala, s., & marder, m. (2014). introduction: the first jolts. in m. marder & s. zabala (eds.), being shaken: ontology and the event (pp. 1-10). new york, ny: palgrave. http://joynetanyathompson.com/2015/03/23/to-live-and-die-well-fuller-magazine/ corresponding author: nicholas davey, phd university of dundee email: jrndavey@dundee.ac.uk journal of applied hermeneutics september 28, 2017 the author(s) 2017 education and the formative power of hermeneutic practice1 nicholas davey abstract this paper seeks to clarify the educational role and effects of hermeneutic practice. the argument is that far from becoming irrelevant to the ever changing needs of the social economy, the humanities and especially the hermeneutic practices on which they depend, are vital to intensifying those processes of social and cultural renewal upon which the well-being of a community depends. keywords hermeneutics, interpretation, incommensurability, subject-matters, practice, education, social renewal statement of aims this paper endeavours to demonstrate that hermeneutic practices have indirect formative educative effects that are key to processes of social transformation and re-vitalisation. not only do hermeneutic processes interpret cultural change but they can initiate it. the argument does not seek to legitimise hermeneutic practice by subsuming it within a preferred educational ideology. this would instrumentalise hermeneutic practice as a means of achieving pre-defined objectives and render it a tool of social management. such an outcome could not have been further from davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 2 gadamer’s mind when he argued that the task of university education is to allow individuals to create their own free spaces and for them to move there in (gadamer, 1992, p. 59). it is precisely the non-utility of hermeneutic practices which make them so vital to education and to encouraging those processes of experiential transformation upon which cultural and economic rejuvenation depend. to understand the relevance of hermeneutic practices to both humanities education and the task of social renewal, we need to think about philosophical hermeneutics differently. we need to take a step beyond gadamer and consider the anthropological dimensions of hermeneutic practice and their effects. with this step, the educational and socially generative powers of hermeneutic practice will become apparent. this also has a bearing upon how post-gadamerian hermeneutics might develop. working within a heideggerian architectonic, gadamer establishes the philosophical preconditions governing the possibility of understanding. these articulated ontologically are that any literary or historical experience of meaning is preconditioned by the enabling fact of existence within the horizons of language and tradition. appropriately, the nature of cultural and historical transmission figures prominently in gadamer’s reflections. the argument that a cultural work is historically constituted by its effects is central to hans jauss’s and wolfgang iser’s development of reception theory. 1 the latter reveals what is missing from gadamer’s position: a clear account of how the processes of historical transmission work. this is not fully given by iser but his emphasis upon the effects of interpretation-practices moves in an appropriate direction. gadamer’s hermeneutics provides a classic explication of what hermeneutic practice pre-supposes but leaves the key question unanswered: what is it about the givens of tradition and linguisticality that render hermeneutic practice transformatively effective in experiential terms? what are the operative “mechanics” of hermeneutic practice through which its effects are generated? if we can understand the mechanics of hermeneutic practice, we can appreciate their effects and if we can understand how they are achieved, we can understand the pivotal educational importance of hermeneutic practice. the transformative effects of hermeneutic practice (and hence their educational significance) are a consequence of (1) interpretation’s anticipation of completeness being applied within, (2), the indeterminate horizons of linguistic meaning. the social and educational relevance of hermeneutics is a consequence of the productive tension between the aims of hermeneutic practice—the achievement of completion—and the environment of linguistic indeterminacy in which that achievement is pursued. the practice turn why the practice turn within hermeneutic reflection? without reflecting on the nature of hermeneutic practice itself we will fail to grasp its educational importance. to do this we need to think about hermeneutics slightly differently: we need to consider hermeneutic practices from the “outside” as it were, and seek to grasp the mechanisms which both institute and constitute hermeneutic experience. we need to ask not what these mechanisms are for but what do they do? to understand what something does, is to understand its effects. 1 see in particular wolfgang iser (2000), the range of interpretation, new york, ny: columbia university press. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 3 we must start to think of hermeneutics as something other than a variety of interpretive methods evolved toward pre-defined objectives irrespective of whether they be philological correction or the reconstruction of a rational intentionality. nietzsche was on to something when he commented, “the most valuable insights are methods”: the instituting of practices generates the valuable insight (nietzsche, 1968, sec 469). it is not the objective of a hermeneutic practice that matters but what the pursuit of that objective engenders irrespective of any prior intention. the social and educational importance of hermeneutic practices lies in their ability to induce serendipitous events which can have significant effects on the horizons of understanding within which they are applied. nietzsche’s observation that a thought strikes us of its own accord rather than when we want it to is correct (nietzsche, 1973, part 1, sec 17), yet, this does not mean that emergences or epiphanies of insight originate ex nihilo. to the contrary, they are an effect of the fact that the matrix of human understanding is instituted by a constant interplay of multiple horizons of understanding, some linguistic, some cultural and others biographical. the serendipitous emergences of insight are the effect of participating in the multiple horizons of understanding which constitute our lifeworld. if so, the question is how to keep these different horizons of understanding in play for it is from out of this play that the serendipitous event of transformative experience can arise. emergence and emergency the emergence of new insight and meanings is never ex nihilo but contextual: it presupposes intellectual, linguistic, and historical horizons from within which new perspectives arise. albeit that these horizons operate within historical a priori structures of reception, they are finite, permeable, and unstable. their instability reflects the fact that their constituting subject-matters are open-ended frameworks of meaning constantly susceptible to re-interpretation. such indeterminacy of meaning is vital to the humanities allowing its meanings to alter and accrue historically: it always permits something more to be said and the disclosure of unexpected determinations of meaning that the contingencies of our historical or linguistic location often prevent us from seeing. put another way, the effects that hermeneutic practices achieve depend on the contexts of linguistic indeterminacy in which they operate. the productivity of hermeneutic practice (its ability to disrupt established meanings and create new ones) is dependent upon an incommensurable relation: the horizon of linguistic indeterminacy in which hermeneutic practices operate, will always be at odds with the quest for completeness they pursue. at least three factors render this incommensurability productive: the pursuit of excellence within a practice; the quest for a firmer grasp of a founding truth within a practice; and, finally, the generative capacities of interpretative practices themselves. with regard to excellence, hermeneutic practices also generate instability within received horizons of understanding because of their normative nature. alasdair macintyre suggests that practices have built into them socially developed expectations of excellence (macintyre, 1993, p. 187). excellence is always contentious and by its nature provokes disagreement and debate. what is more, contested traditions are more often than not intellectually vibrant ones. however, it is not just the normative quest for a more articulate interpretation that drives a hermeneutic practice; it is also the incompleteness of its grounding understanding. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 4 concerning the quest for a firmer grasp of a founding truth, no historical community owns its truths or meanings. each requires historical time to fill out their content. as rowan williams argues, “there is an indefinite time opened up for (the) reception and interpretation (of such truths); (their) object is located outside the closures of specific conflicts and settlements of interest” (williams, 2012, p. 15). precisely because no community can assert complete authority over its truths without denying their transcendent nature, that community is exposed to recognizing the possibility that a foreign tradition may hold an unseen aspect of its own founding truths. the impetus to closure (which is not to say it is achievable) produces instability: by seeking in the foreign a completer understanding of its own position, a community opens itself to truth claims other than its own. turning to the generative capacities of interpretive practices, the fragmented nature of experience also has us looking for threads of narrative completeness so that we can make sense of our historical predicament. gadamer talks in truth and method of an anticipation of completeness whereby we strive to eliminate the undecided and ambiguous in experience and achieve a completion of meaning such that no lines of meaning scatter in the void (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 113). the point is not whether such a completion can be achieved but that such quests often provoke new and unexpected alignments of the part-whole relationships that constitute human experience. interpretation emerges as a practice of proliferation generating additional possibilities from within the subject-matters shaping our horizons. in summary, we have argued that the conditions governing the emergence of new insight and meaning involve the following. (1) hermeneutic practices always operate contextually within horizons from which new perspectives arise. (2) practices are normative in that they seek from within their operational horizons more precise articulations of their subject-matters. (3) the impetus to completeness drives a practice to confront alien perspectives. (4) hermeneutic differentials (the incommensurable gap between how a subject-matter is conceived and how it is applied) renders interpretation not a practice of closure but one of proliferation. the dynamics of proliferation relate to the incommensurability at the heart of hermeneutic practice. the infinity of meaning that constitutes the linguistic horizon of understanding spurs hermeneutic practices toward a completer grasp of their incompletely grasped truths. yet, precisely, because of the infinite relatedness of linguistic meaning, the more hermeneutic practices seek closure, the more they open other possibilities of meaning capable of challenging the truths they have a slim grip on. no practice owns its subject-matter. the indefiniteness of meaning surrounding them allows them to function more as open constellations of concern rather than as determinate concepts. i might as an 18th century aesthetician believe that the pursuit of beauty embraces a humanizing concern with balance, harmony and proportion. the author of the iliad knew otherwise: helen of troy’s beauty is connected with disharmony, misery and war. any cartesian or idealist aesthetician advocating the humanizing virtue of beauty must also contend with its darker maddening powers. the ability of hermeneutic practices to generate meanings does not just depend upon their subject-matters standing in an opaque field of meaning. it also requires that different fields repeatedly inter-penetrate one another. subject-matters always reside in other words. they are in davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 5 rosenzweig’s term “indefinable:” temporary historical articulations of meaning that because of the inter-relatedness of all linguistic meaning, contain an infinity of possible meanings yet to be drawn out from them. it is also clear that linguistic meanings can cross and penetrate multiple horizons of concern. like concepts, they “cut-across one another” (wittgenstein, 1967, p. 379). nothing is commoner, wittgenstein argues, for the meaning of an expression to oscillate, for a phenomenon to be regarded sometimes as a symptom, sometimes a criterion, of a state of affairs (p. 438). a shift of meaning, a new semantic emergence, in one horizon can create an emergency in another. does this introduce an insurmountable negativity into the argument? the capacity of hermeneutic practices to generate disruptive effects within established bodies of meaning seems to concede the critical case to post-structuralist and deconstructive critics of hermeneutics and the humanities. in formal terms, it would appear that deconstruction is indeed correct. the finite nature of understanding combined with the infinite horizon of linguistic meaning conspire to guarantee that there can be no final interpretation. nevertheless, the finitude of understanding allows accrual and exchange between perspectives. however, the inconclusive openness that deconstruction derides in hermeneutics is precisely what an education in the humanities depends on. indeed, from within the perspective of the humanities, the demand for certainty and a final interpretation is incoherent. an end-interpretation which realized all the possible determinations of a subject matter’s meaning would foreclose those free spaces of possibility from within which new learning and action may arise. furthermore, in times of social and economic upheaval it is precisely the practices that question institutionalized understandings and open new possibilities or understanding that are needed. the capacity of hermeneutic practices to achieve unintended effects that place our perspectives in a new light accords them the agency of change. coming to understand through the temporal diversity of experience a greater number of a subject matter’s possible determinations, allows that subject-matter to become in gadamer’s phrase “more what it is.” this, however, is not the only salient educative point. the drive by hermeneutic practice to overcome the differentials of understanding may productively displace established perspectives on canonical texts (and thereby remind us of the finitude of our judgment) but it affects another more personal dimension of our understanding. when i write about a certain philosophical problem professionally, i do so from within a specialist academic practice with a well-defined objective: to achieve a more adequate understanding of a hermeneutic issue. blanks in an interpretation may need filling out and, for the sake of its credibility, inconsistencies removed. this formal exercise does not just take place within the horizon of philosophical tradition but also within the existential horizons of my understanding. these horizons are not discrete. like concepts and subject-matters, they interleave and over-lap. linguality guarantees this. questions of what it means to be a good husband, a good citizen or a european are not just for moral and political philosophy. they are questions which probe my self-understanding and identity. as wittgenstein remarks, subject-matters and concepts “cut-across one another” (wittgenstein, 1967, p. 379). a shift of meaning in one horizon can create an emergency in another. the anticipation of completeness is not just a feature of academic practice but a projective structure within all human experience. experience is full of contradictions, unresolved questions and unrealized expectations that we yearn to make sense of, complete and fulfil. the partial coherence of such experience suggests the possibility of an as yet undiscovered insight that might render the presently incoherent, narratively coherent. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 6 the horizon of academic life may (because of professionalization) be increasingly separated from that of the everyday but gadamer’s notion of linguality shows that it is not. what sensitizes me to the discovery of new meanings and to changes in established ones is that as a human being of incomplete experience, i am always alert to the configurations of meaning that might make sense of a key problem or difficulty. an anticipation of completeness is as cardinal feature of lived-experience as it is of reading a novel. this suggests that whilst the anticipation of completeness drives hermeneutic practice toward a fuller articulation of a subject-matter’s meaning, its generation of new meanings might have unanticipated consequences for my selfunderstanding. this offers purchase on the questions of how hermeneutic practices produce unexpected effects within the matrix of understanding. the argument returns us to the two operative principles (1) the indeterminacy of linguistic meaning and (2) the impetus to completion. hermeneutic effects the unexpected effects of understanding are the result of what is already at play within our hermeneutic horizons. this involves the indeterminacy of linguistic meaning and the drive to completion. regarding (1), the indeterminacy of linguistic meaning; the principle establishes the logical basis of the claim that by virtue of being a language speaker i am connected to networks of meaning i am not presently conscious of. in other words, the transformative effects of hermeneutic practice are a consequence of the inter-relatedness of linguistic meaning. only because the term “leisure” is already etymologically connected to the latin scola could the discovery of that connection transform my hitherto limited grasp of the word. the term has little to do with modern notions of relaxation but more with achieving a freedom from everyday labors in order to learn and contemplate. it was an inarticulate anticipation of a better account of aesthetic disinterest that prompted an enquiry into the connections between leisure and disinterested looking. hermeneutic practice did the rest. because of the etymological connections between leisure, scola and seeing disinterestedly, a new meaning of aesthetic community arose. the point is simply this: the transformative effects of this localized hermeneutic practice were the direct consequence of that practice’s anticipation of completeness exposing and animating hidden conceptual connections within the indeterminate horizon of linguality. it is the pursuit of a better, more comprehensive interpretation which can both expand and unsettle commitments to meaning in the horizons within which that completer interpretation is pursued. this re-iterates the observation that hermeneutic practice is performative: it produces emergent phenomena capable of equally expanding and disrupting established meanings. a key meaning of the verb to educate is to draw or lead out. hermeneutic practice achieves this. a hermeneutic account of education will have little to do with technical training but more to do with freeing spaces in which new alignments of meaning can arise. concerning (2) the capacity of the impetus to completion to induce unexpected effects in the matrix of understanding; some of wittgenstein’s comments about interpretation are insightful. in zettel he comments, 1. …to interpret, to give the final interpretation which is not a further sign or picture, but something else—the thing that cannot be further interpreted. but what we have reached is a psychological, not a logical terminus. (wittgenstein, 1967, p. 231) davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 7 2. what happens is not that this symbol cannot (logically speaking) be further interpreted, but: i do no (more) interpreting. i do not interpret because i feel at home in the present picture. when i interpret, i step from one level of thought to another. (1967, p. 234) that hermeneutics grants (a) that all linguistic meaning is indeterminate and (b) that there is no end to interpretation, seems to render the drive to completeness logically futile. it is, however, not the achievement of completion that matters but what the quest for it gives rise to, its effects, as it were. wittgenstein recognises this. that there is no end, logically speaking, to the ways a symbol may be interpreted does not mean that a practical closure of interpretation is impossible. wittgenstein’s remark that i do no more interpreting when i have reached a psychological terminus clearly implies that i stop interpreting, that i reach a sort of hermeneutic (though not a logical) terminus. the question is, what is it that induces me to stop? gadamer might argue that i stop interpreting when the text or art work speaks to me, that is, when a certain hermeneutic closure of meaning occurs. for wittgenstein i stop interpreting when i feel at ease within a certain framework of meaning: i know how to move around it as if i were at home within it. practical closure is achieved: no longer am i standing outside a framework of meaning analysing it, as it were, but have returned inside it and know how to proceed according to its rules. i do no more interpreting because of something already at play in my understanding. it is precisely because i carry within me a whole range of unanswered questions and unresolved experiences that i am vulnerable to the sudden emergence of an image or phrase which can unexpectedly bring those experiences and questions into a meaningful frame. this does not imply that the meaning of ambiguous text or experience has been found. as wittgenstein’s position implies, the text logically speaking can always be further interpreted. nevertheless, the fact remains that i stop interpreting and i refrain from further hermeneutic activity and arguably i do so because a chance epiphany of meaning answers an unresolved ambiguity active in my horizons of understandings. furthermore, the quest for closure in one framework may give rise serendipitously to a whole range of unexpected associations of meaning which though they might not achieve the sought after closure in one discourse might nevertheless resolve ambiguities in other horizons of concern. an example might be instructive. what did nietzsche mean when he asserted that it was of the utmost importance to give style to one’s life? pursuing this question will give rise to a parallel concern with the shaping power of narrative structure. style and narrative both offer ways of giving unity to multiplicities but, as always, the question is which structure to choose? argument is truly engaged: followers of galen strawson on the one hand and alasdair macintyre on the other dispute whether with human life becomes insufferably restricted by the imposition of a narrative structure upon it, or becomes quite unintelligible without it. strawson’s scepticism reflects a criticism made of gadamer. when gadamer argues that an encounter with art reveals the “hermeneutic continuity of human existence,” he has no right (it is claimed) to assume without warrant that life has such a continuity. now, it would be churlish to suppose that these issues concern just academic charge and counter-charge. they also speak to how we orientate ourselves to experience. a chance remark of wittgenstein offered a serendipitous solution to both the formal and existential dimensions of nietzsche’s question. the key hermeneutic point is that the remark could not have done so had my academic and personal horizons not already attuned me to the possibility of an answer. wittgenstein remarks that “seeing life as a weave” implies a “pattern” that “is not always davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 8 complete and is varied in a multiplicity of ways” (wittgenstein, 1967, p. 568). the argument is, then, that there is no narrative or style to be imposed on life; there is no continuity which a life has. much rather, it is a question of drawing out the implications of those possibilities already at play within one’s horizons. it is the ever changing patterns of one’s involvements that gives sense to, give style to a life, not any narrative imposed upon it. the question of what style to adopt for one’s life arguably disappears. it becomes a question of becoming more what one is, that is, of pursuing the concerns and interests already at play within one’s existence. the salient point is that nietzsche’s question and its existential implications sensitize and pre-dispose me to wittgenstein’s remark. i am hermeneutically primed to be receptive to it for it offers a way of closing the problematic that nietzsche’s question opened. i no longer interpret nietzsche’s question because i have found a way of living within its entailments. formally speaking, my way of living with nietzsche’s question does not constitute a logical terminus to its interpretation. the indeterminacy of linguistic meaning implies that the nature of the question and its possible answers always remain open. yet the hermeneutic effect (my response) is not arbitrary: it touches on sensitive issues within my existential horizons. wittgenstein’s remark meets what my anticipation of completeness strives for. however, though the solution may fit the needs of my present existential horizons, it always remains vulnerable to the challenge of future experience. education: hermeneutics as disruption at the heart of this argument is an anthropological speculation: change and its challenge is fundamental to human existence. gadamer indicates that understanding is never stable but always reflects the type of beings-in motion that we are (gadamer, 1989, p. xxx). what he describes as the negativity of experience—the capacity of change to disrupt expectancy—has always disturbed human beings. academia is not immune from such disruption. there is no doubt that the global economic crisis and the merchandising of university education pose serious challenges to the teaching of the humanities. their lack of obvious material productivity in a shrinking economy questions their contribution to social wealth. however, educating communities only in today’s productive technologies in effect condemns them to future redundancy. it is the capacity to meet social and economic change that matters, not the shortterm ability to render oneself safe from a challenge that will always return. the contrast between technological and humanities based education is in this respect stark. the implementation of technological systems demands the elimination of chance and disruption. the well-being of the humanities demands the opposite: the generation of chance and disruption. only in times of paradigm crises are technological disciplines forced to re-appraise their operating parameters where as in the humanities, the dynamics and context of hermeneutic practice guarantee to keep their self-understanding in permanent crisis. this is a point of dual importance. 1. the significance of hermeneutic practice within the humanities is that it offers experiences both of change and disruption and of learning how to control such “negativity of experience” in safe and creative ways. this is the vital relevance of the humanities to the social economy: using personal experience it teaches how to react positively and creatively to the demands of radical change. in times of crisis who is more deployable: those trained in systemized logics of the same and the repeatable or davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 9 those who have acquired the disruptive skills of creative thinking and who can confront difference, disruption and change? if humanities academics thought more of the hermeneutic effects of their practices, their economic and social value would be self-evident. 2. from an anthropological perspective, the provocation of change is fundamental to the development and testing of human capacities. francisco varela, the brazilian phenomenologist and anthropologist, speculates that if human beings had a fixed essence with a determinate set of response repertoires, human survival in a world of constant flux would have been comprised long ago: “living systems are autopoietic insofar as they have no essence that they could appeal to or draw from in order to function” (varela, 1979, p. 107). “as the system has no essence, it must avail itself of… previous behavioural patterns and processes potentially all the efforts it has made to ensure self-maintenance” (iser, 1968/2000, p. 105). for michael oakeshott, we are essentially narrative creating creatures, continually assessing collected experience discursively. the importance of hermeneutic practices within the humanities is that they institute mechanisms for constantly probing received wisdom. their importance for education and social rejuvenation resides in their capacity for generating controlled disruption. part of the persuasiveness of varela’s argument is that it links gadamer’s account of education with its idealist background. varela presents the organic nature of human life as a system that “has no goal outside itself.” “it must take up what it has already developed earlier as guidance for maintaining self-organisation” (iser, 1968/2000, p. 105). “recursive history allows the system to reactivate its own past as an interlocked history of structural transformations” (p. 105). these remarks compare well with gadamer’s presentation of bildung as the self-formation of human beings through self-education, a complex notion which has roots in philosophical romanticism. bildung is not achieved in the manner of a technical construction, but grows out of an inner process of formation and cultivation, and therefore remains in a state of continual bildung… like nature, bildung has no goals outside itself… in having no goals outside itself, the concept bildung transcends that of the mere cultivation of given talents. (gadamer, 1989, p. 11) bildung is not a point of graduation, more a mode of being that knows how to keep the different horizons informing experience in constant play. the play is crucial for, as we have argued, it sets the circumstances out of which unexpected hermeneutic effects can arise. in hermeneutic workshops in the essay the idea of the university gadamer asserts that the very task of university education is to “find free spaces and learn to move therein” (1992, p. 59). education is thus a matter of finding the “truly open questions and therefore the possibilities that exist.” moving into this openness is a passage into something more than something known, more than something davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 10 learnable “… it is a passage into a place where something happens to us” (p. 59). gadamer’s invocation of the “free space” offers a useful summary point for our argument. 1. the “free space” gadamer’s speaks of is the space of hermeneutic inter-play between the indeterminancy of all linguistic meaning and the impetus to completion. 2. the impetus to completion seeks to actualise many of the possibilities for meaning held within the indeterminate horizons of language. hermeneutic practice is educative in that it draws out possibilities for new insight from what is already at play within our personal and collective horizons of understanding. 3. hermeneutic practice is attentive to that space of inter-play. within that space, hermeneutic practice is a way of encouraging the emergence of new modes of understanding by reason of our involvement in that space and not because of any deliberate intention. there is an obvious critical riposte. how can such spaces be free when all cultural, linguistic spaces are determinate spaces? they cannot be, by definition, pre-suppositionless spaces. if they were, they could not be places of possibility. skorupski comments that after kant, “truly free thought… must investigate the conditions of its own possibility.”2 gadamer describes the task of hermeneutics as enquiring into the very conditions of understanding. free thought for gadamer is not a question of pre-suppositionless understanding but of freeing thought from being exclusively concerned with the everyday in order to allow that which is already at play-withinone’s thinking to unfold its possibilities. this indicates how close gadamer remains to lessing and humboldt and their notions of history as the self-education of mankind. as john burrows observes, this concept (bildung) contained, or could be invested with… the pre-supposition of an inner, spontaneous vitality, and of an, underlying coherence or pattern working itself out through an immense diversity and gaining nourishment from it, and of a creative, reciprocal relation to experience, in which even error and suffering were made meaningful through the concept of education. (burrows, 1969, p. xviii) the parallel with gadamer’s hegelian notion of the negativity of experience and its classical roots in aeschylus’s conception of pathei mathos is striking. however, the useful aspect of this critical riposte is that offers the occasion to re-emphasize that gadamer’s appeal to a situated free space is an appeal to set free the possibilities that are already within our hermeneutic horizons. in this respect, gadamer’s free space is closer to heidegger’s notion of an “opening” or clearing. the freedom of the open consists neither in unfettered arbitrariness nor in the constraint of mere laws. freedom is that which conceals in a way that opens to light, in whose clearing there shimmers that veil that hides the essential occurrence of all truth and lets 2 john skorupski, why read mill today? (london and new york: routledge, 2006), 6. i am indebted to robert stern’s “hegelian metaphysics,” oxford scholarship on-line (sep. 2009): doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239108.001.0001. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 11 the veil appear as that which veils. freedom is the realm of destining that at any given time starts a revealing upon its way. (heidegger, 1977, p. 25) these remarks emphasize that freedom and free thinking involve not a vacuous, presuppositionless space but rather an acceptance of that which comes to and unfolds before us as a specific and actualisable set of existential possibilities. these remarks might strengthen the charge that the “free space” in question is the unfree space of tradition but, as we have commented, a truly pre-suppositionless space would be a space without possibility and, hence, without the opportunity for action. without the exercise of hermeneutic practice, the generation of new insight is seriously diminished. a hermeneutically orientated education has to aspire to the public and private pursuit of those “free spaces” capable of drawing out those yet to be realised possibilities already at play within our various horizons of understanding. a hermeneutically orientated education would entail the acquisition of those modes of attentive looking and reflection attuned to keeping those horizons in play. by perpetuating such movement, hermeneutic practice would create the conditions whereby emergent and transformative insight arise by default of engagement and participation rather than by deliberate planning or intention. in so far as such a mode of education initiates its participants in processes of extensive, profound but controlled intellectual and personal change, it is hard to think of what greater relevance to the practical and spiritual health of society the humanities could have. a virtuous practice we have argued that hermeneutic practice involves the inter-play of the indeterminacy of all linguistic meaning with the impetus to completion. the impetus to completion strives to actualise anticipated possibilities for meaning held within the indeterminate horizons of language. hermeneutic practice is educative in that it draws out both anticipated and unexpected insights from what is already at play within our personal and collective horizons of understanding. as a way of encouraging the emergence of new modes of understanding, hermeneutic practice also generates its own effects. we might call these effects the virtues of hermeneutic practice. what virtues does the practice hermeneutics instill? the key dispositions are: 1. a sensitivity to how the local and particular is resonant the transcendent. the quest for completeness in horizons of linguistic indeterminacy necessarily leads to the emergence of meanings other than the expected. the emergence of such disruptive moments explodes the cogito of everyday consciousness and exposes it to the speculative reality that transcends each and every ego. hermeneutics gives expression to a philosophy of praxis that opens self-consciousness to the speculative dimensions of the speech-created world that transcends it. hermeneutic practice respects the local and particular as a gateway to the speculative reality beyond it. 2. a faith in the always-more to be seen or understood. attention to hermeneutic detail encourages a patient reflective distance, an awareness that what a hermeneutic experience reveals of a work’s meaning is never complete or final. hermeneutic practice cautions against any rush to judgment: no text or art work discloses itself completely; there is always something more that can be said. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 12 3. a readiness for the unexpected. exposure to the unexpected hermeneutic emergence does not deny the need for planning in any enterprise but recognizes that planning can have unexpected consequences and be frustrated by unforeseeable events. the incommensurability between the indeterminacy of linguistic meaning and the impetus to completion enables the humanities to become workshops for generating and coping with the unpredictable. 4. an open and patient disposition toward the possible. hermeneutic practices encourage opening not toward emptiness but toward hitherto unseen possibilities within the seen. hermeneutic practices reveal how all emergent phenomena can be other than how they present themselves. no interpretive task can formally be judged complete in that a text or artwork can always in principle reveal other of its aspects. learning within the humanities is never complete. 5. a willingness to take part in communicative exchange. although philosophical hermeneutics correctly emphasizes that dialogical exposure to pre-suppositions other than one’s own can make one think differently about one’s initial points or orientation, the very act of participating in dialogue can have unintended effects. a certain accidental turn of phrase or a chance association of images can offer surprise closures of meaning within a certain horizons of expectancy. not only is individual participation a force for collective emergence but simply by being willing to speak we can unbeknown to ourselves help others to come to an unexpected understanding. 6. a courageous openness to experience and inter-disciplinarity. a hermeneutic orientation to leaning becomes ever more conscious of the fact that experience concerns the process of drawing out the possibilities that are already at play within one’s horizon. this implies a willingness to think differently about one’s involvements, and to adopt different experiential and intellectual perspectives toward them, precisely to the end of finding in them unseen or overlooked aspects. a hermeneutic approach to education is acutely aware of the constant need for circumstances and experiences that force us to think differently. hans-georg gadamer’s inter-disciplinary hermeneutics can be understood as an eloquent protest against the limitations of living only one life.3 7. a modesty of disposition to the unknown and the unexpected. the “negativity of experience” always offers a painful reminder that we are not gods, that we are only too capable of getting it wrong, that we do not know it all, and that (thankfully) horizon of learning is always open. 8. a detached but committed attentiveness. hermeneutic practices establish a “free space” whereby the movements of the subject-matters that constitute our personal and collective lifeworlds can be discerned. attending to movement in one horizon can induce transformative change in another. the impetus to completion drives hermeneutic attentiveness. hermeneutic experience teaches, however, that rarely is it the meaning pursued that is productive but rather the transformative meanings which 3 to compare gadamer’s stance with that of alexander humboldt, see the latter’s the limits of state action. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 13 the quest gives rise to. participation within the various horizons of understanding is key. an open conclusion the well-being of a tradition as well as of the horizons and concerns of a spectator require that they remain in motion. movement, as gadamer, insists is the life of the human spirit. intellectual and creative renewal depends upon a degree of disruption. the vitality of social and economic endeavour let alone that of university education, demands adaptability and the skills of thinking beyond the restraints of the customary and the expected. exposure to the strange and unexpected can be unsettling, but as gadamer suggests, no one can be protected from experience (gadamer, 1989, p. 356). in an environment of change, a creature formed by dint of experience survives only by constantly questioning and testing its expectancies. here, the social and economic significance of the humanities can be effectively and emphatically asserted. the practice of hermeneutic attentiveness across the humanities requires controlled environments within which participants can safely expose their cultural expectancies to the unexpected and test their capability for transformative response. it is impossible to predict the nature and extent of the challenges that the future holds but the quality and depth of response will be key. if transformative experience arises when the horizons of meaning attached to cultural works collide serendipitously with those of the spectator, the extent and creativity of the spectator’s response will be informed by the width of the cultural horizons they can draw on. the value of discipline canons is not that they perpetrate exemplary practice but that they lay down in the spectator the foundations of response-repertoires that only the future will probe and test. not to invest in the attentive practices of the humanities; not to nurture the ability to dwell within spaces of hermeneutic challenge, and not to teach how to be patient in developing as yet unknown but wished for responses to such provocations, is to disinvest in our collective ability to respond creatively to the inevitable challenges of the future. notes this was first presented as the keynote paper at the north american society for philosophical hermeneutics annual conference, roanoke college, september 13, 2014. references burrows, j.w. (1967). editor’s introduction. in w. von humboldt, the limits of state action (pp. vii xlv). london, uk: cambridge university press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev.ed.; j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (1992). on education, poetry, and history: applied hermeneutics (d. misgeld & g. nicholson, eds. & trans.). albany, ny: state university of new york press. heidegger, m. (1977). the question concerning technology and other essays (w. lovitt, trans.). new york, ny: harper row. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 8 14 iser, w. (1968/2000). the range of interpretation. new york, ny: columbia university press. macintyre, a. (1993). after virtue: a study in moral theory. london, uk: duckworth. nietzsche, f. (1968). the will to power. london, uk: weidenfeld & nicolson. nietzsche, f. (1973). beyond good and evil. london, uk: penguin. skorupski, j. (2006). why read mill today? london, uk: routledge. stern, r. (2009). hegelian metaphysics. oxford scholarship on-line. accessed from doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239108.001.0001. varela, f.j. (1979). principles of biological autonomy. new york, ny: elsevier north holland. williams, r. (2012). faith in the public square. london, uk: bloomsbury. wittgenstein, l. (1967). zettel. oxford, uk: blackwell. corresponding author: theodore george, phd department of philosophy, texas a&m university email: t-george@tamu.edu journal of applied hermeneutics december 23, 2017 the author(s) 2017 grieving as limit situation of memory: gadamer, beamer, and moules on the infinite task posed by the dead theodore george abstract in this paper, the author turns to hans-georg gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics to examine the experience of grieving. specifically, the author argues that grieving may be grasped as a limit situation of memory. this approach suggests that grieving cannot be adequately captured by a stage model theory but, instead, poses an infinite task that is fraught with difficulty and ethical demands. the author develops this approach in reference not only to hans-georg gadamer but recent research by nancy moules and kate beamer. keywords gadamer, philosophical hermeneutics, grief, memory one of karl jaspers’ most influential ideas is that human beings can become aware of decisive terms of their existence through “limit situations” (jaspers, 1969). by this, jaspers has in mind that the character of existence becomes clearest to us through the most extreme moments of our lives; that we can learn something decisive about what it is to be human, to be a person, to be a self, when the situations we find ourselves in press us to the very limits of our existence. of course, jaspers’ notion of the limit situation plays a specific role in his own program of research. but, in the days, weeks, and now months since my father’s death, i continue to come back to the idea that we can, and perhaps should, also identify as a limit situation the experience of grieving. george journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 11 2 specifically, i wish to suggest that grieving may be grasped, at least in part, as a limit situation of memory. while the raison d’être of this short piece is to reflect a little on this idea, it is not difficult to see why one might come to believe that grieving presses the possibilities of memory to the brink. for, whatever else grieving involves, grieving confers to memory the monstrous challenge of cherishing, protecting, and fostering a relation with one who, because dead, is no longer able to relate to us, as they say, in the flesh. obviously, this short piece can only be considered preliminary and exploratory, given that i do not situate my considerations within the larger context of current debate on grieving. i have, however, found orientation in (and will refer to at least tangentially) kate beamer’s essay, “and the coyote howled: listening to the call of interpretive inquiry,” as well as nancy moules’ editorial piece, “grief and hermeneutics: archives of lives and the conflicted character of grief,” both found in this issue. * * * it should not surprise us that gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics sheds light on some of the limits at issue in the experience of grieving. this is not only because of gadamer’s relation to jaspers—the fact that gadamer held jaspers in esteem (grondin, 2003, pp. 209–210) or that gadamer has suggested affinities between his approach and jaspers’ notion of situation, (gadamer, 2003, p. 301). more still, gadamer’s elucidation of our efforts to understand brings into focus something of a limit situation of memory that speaks to the experience of grieving. this limit situation derives from gadamer’s claim that memory is not to be grasped first of all as a “psychological phenomenon,” but, rather, as “an essential element of the finite historical being of human being” (gadamer, 2003, p. 16). gadamer, we recall, eschews pretenses of knowledge claims that purport to transcend all historical conditions. quite to the contrary, he argues that the hermeneutical experience of understanding remains always conditioned by what he calls prejudice, or, historically inherited meanings that not only limit but first make possible our efforts to understand and, moreover, abide even when our efforts to understand unfold and come to fruition. our efforts to understand neither aim at, nor admit of, indubitable foundations of knowledge, but, instead, seek always to discern and develop novel insight from out of the inherited meanings that have survived across what he once alludes to as the conflagration of history (gadamer, 2007, p. 200). “we understand in a different way,” as gadamer puts the point, “if we understand at all” (gadamer, 2003, p. 297). as his elucidation suggests, however, our efforts to understand are thus really nothing else than efforts to recollect, to collect again, always in new and different manners, meaning that remains available to us from the past. that gadamer’s elucidation of hermeneutical experience points to a limit situation of memory is apparent from his description of understanding as an infinite task. our efforts to understand never admit of finality or closure. this is, first of all, because hermeneutical experience is characterized by the facticity of existence (gadamer, 2003, p. 254). the situations we find ourselves in constantly shift, change, and evolve, so that we are led to bring novel questions to bear on our efforts to understand new matters as well as matters that we have already sought to understand before. over the course of our experience, though, we find that we seek to understand george journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 11 3 some matters over and over, while others fade from focus to fringe. this, in turn, is because such matters prove to be relevant time and again, perhaps even in unexpected ways; and, however often we return to them, our efforts to understand them seem always genuinely to yield something new, something different. no matter how much our situations shift, change, and evolve, there appear to be certain life events, certain encounters and relationships with others, certain texts and works of art, that are inexhaustible in their significance. it is here, in our efforts to understand such matters of inexhaustible significance, that gadamer’s approach suggests a limit situation of memory. if our efforts to understand are nothing else than attempts to recollect, as gadamer suggests, then matters of inexhaustible significance are not only so indispensable that we return to them time and again. moreover, at the same time, these matters are likewise impossible to recollect with any finality and closure. gadamer’s approach to the motif of memory helps, i think, give contour to the limit-character of grieving. in my experience of my father’s death, much of my grieving has coalesced in efforts to understand. these efforts include the imponderables—why now? why cancer? how do i understand this sadness? how do i understand myself, all my aspirations and insecurities, my relations to kin, kind, and community now that my father is gone? but these efforts are also directed more concretely toward what can perhaps be grasped as texts left behind by my father’s death or in reference to what moules calls “archives of lives” (moules, 2017). as for moules, so for me too, my father’s death has deposited troves of materials in my life—in my case, legal documents, his books (sometimes dog-eared or with notes in the margins), his military keepsakes, magazine article cutouts with features about him, his law firm, or members of his family, photographs, and, of course, too, ashes of his remains. if my grieving has taken shape in efforts to understand, however, this process is perhaps best grasped in terms of the limit situation of memory. already, it appears that my experience of my father’s death will prove to be an event inexhaustible in significance to me. in this, however, my efforts to understand and, with them, to remember my father, also already strike me as an infinite task, at once indispensable and impossible to bring to a close. * * * the idea that grieving can, at least in part, be grasped as a limit situation of memory also brings important further considerations to mind. first, this idea may contribute to discussion (or, in any case, at least suggest further evidence) of beamer’s (2017) and moules’ (2017) rejection of stage model theories of grieving in favor of the idea that “grief is an experience that is ongoing, that changes in nature over time, but that involves a continuing relationship with the deceased” (moules, simonson, prins, & angus, 2004, p. 2). as moules furthers this approach in her editorial, grief is “complicated”; “it involves moving back and forth between memory, love, anger, disappointment, reality, romance, gratitude, admiration, regret, and history” (moules, 2017, p. 2). the idea that grieving is bound up with a limit situation of memory, too, recommends not a stage model but, instead, a more expansive conception of grieving. for, if grieving involves us in a limit situation of memory, then grieving poses an infinite task, and thus not one that can be reduced to a predefined series of stages and predetermined terminus. grieving remains unending george journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 11 4 because, as a limit situation of memory, it can become as necessary for our lives as it is impossible to finish with. it can be necessary whenever the death of another person (but perhaps not only a person) proves to be a crucial event in our lives—whenever, that is, another person’s death becomes a question for us that we cannot help but pose to ourselves and to the world we find ourselves in. and, whenever grieving thus becomes necessary, it is just as much impossible to finish with. when the death of another person proves to be relevant for so many of the situations we find ourselves in, when it proves to be a renewed source of meaning and orientation, and, with this, of joy and sadness, then, in such a case, grieving is not something to get through, get past, or get over, but, rather, becomes an integral part of one’s life. the idea that grieving can, at least in part, be grasped as a limit situation of memory may also give further contour to what beamer takes up in reference to the “trickster” figure in the folklore of many cultures (beamer, 2017, p. 4; cf. moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015, p. 2). in this, beamer takes her point of departure from an intense experience she had after her spouse’s funeral of what she describes in terms of the coyote figure of the trickster. on the impetus provided by this experience, beamer draws an analogy between aspects of the practice of hermeneutic research and the experience of grieving, arguing that both, like coyote, are unpredictable, unfold in surprises, and that, because of this, both require the virtues of patience, humility, and openness (beamer, 2017). while beamer’s approach far exceeds the scope of my reflections in this short piece, it is hard for me not to make a connection between her idea that grieving is inhabited by a trickster and the notion of grieving as a limit situation of memory. in this, i wonder whether the trickster may be said (or said also) to carry out her pranks precisely at this limit. as the situations we find ourselves in constantly shift, change, and evolve, so too our attempts to remember. we attempt to recollect different matters, or the matters we have recollected before collect themselves in novel and different manners, often without warning and in surprising ways. and, too, the matters themselves may be filled with tricks: perhaps, we recollect something in one manner, trusting our memory of it, only to find in the next moment that this recollection contained a ruse, say, that one aspect of what we remember turns out really only to distort or conceal another more crucial aspect. the idea that grieving is bound up with a limit situation of memory may, finally, also lead us to a consideration of the ethical profile of our relation to the deceased. the consideration i have in mind is perhaps drawn out most fully in jacques derrida’s approach to the death of the friend in his essay, “rams: uninterrupted dialogue – between two infinities, the poem.” it is not insignificant for my brief remarks here that derrida first developed these reflections on the death of the friend on the occasion of gadamer’s death. in “rams,” derrida cites a passage from paul celan’s poetry to help describe the experience of the death of a friend. the passage reads: “the world is gone, i must carry you” (derrida, 2005, p. 141). there is much to be said, and much has been said, about the occasion of derrida’s “rams” and his use of celan’s poem, not to mention celan’s poem itself. what strikes me within the present context, however, is that the verb “to carry” invoked by celan provides something of a motto for the ethical profile of grieving. while our friend or loved one is still alive, our relation is, or at least can be, carried out by us both, mutually, and in the flesh. once our friend or loved one is dead, however, our relation can no longer be carried out by us both in the flesh but must rather be carried on only by the survivor, george journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 11 5 and only in memory. if grieving involves us in the limit situation of memory, and, indeed, a limit that makes of grieving an infinite task, then this entails the ethical demand to carry the memory of the dead. the difficulty of this ethical demand is, no doubt, indicated by the fact that it refuses to be addressed in predictable stages and, for that matter, resists ever being completely fulfilled. the difficulty of this demand is further indicated by moules’ suggestion that grieving is complicated, as well as beamer’s suggestion that a trickster is at work (and play) in our efforts to grieve. the demand to carry the memory of the deceased is as arduous as it is perilous, fraught with jeopardies, as well as with an entire round dance of thoughts, emotions, and ups and downs. yet, it should be mentioned that the verb “to carry,” both in english and in celan’s original german (tragen), also connotes the anticipated arrival of new life. to carry, this also means: to be pregnant with an unborn child, to hope for and tend as best one can for livebirth, and to prepare the world for the child’s arrival. if celan’s poem speaks to the ethical demand to carry the memory of the deceased, then his turn of phrase suggests that this demand is as much about the future as the past. in this, the ethical demand to carry the memory of the deceased into the future is, at the same time, a promise of novelty, both for ourselves and for the memory of our friend or loved one as we seek to carry on unaccompanied. references beamer, k. (2017). and coyote howled: listening to the call of interpretive inquiry. journal of applied hermeneutics. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5n010b1 derrida, j. (2005). rams: uninterrupted dialogue – between two infinities, the poem. sovereignties in question. new york, ny: fordham university press. gadamer, h-g. (2003). truth and method (2nd rev.ed; j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (2007). word and image: ‘so true, so full of being. in h-g. gadamer, the gadamer reader: a bouquet of later writings (richard palmer, ed.). evanston, il: northwestern university press. grondin, j. (2003). hans-georg gadamer: a biography (j. weinsheimer, trans.). new haven, ct: yale university press. jaspers, k. (1969) philosophy, (vol. 2, e.b. ashton, trans.). chicago, il: university of chicago press. moules, n.j., simonson, k., prins, m., angus, p. & bell, j.m. (2004). making room for grief: walking backwards and living forward. nursing inquiry, 11(2) 99–107. moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5n010b1 george journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 11 6 moules, n.j. (2017). grief and hermeneutics: archives of lives and the conflicted character of grief. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 1. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5h708h8 http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5h708h8 microsoft word mcinnes corrected proof.docx corresponding author: dr. brian d. mcinnes university of minnesota duluth email: bmcinnes@d.umn.edu journal of applied hermeneutics july 11, 2013 the author(s) 2013 saving culture through language: a hermeneutic phenomenological study of ojibwe language immersion educator experience brian mcinnes abstract with the near extinction of many tribal languages at the present, language immersion education offers considerable promise for the revitalization of ojibwe culture and identity. through a series of structured interviews and longitudinal text-based dialogue, eight educators from three schoolbased programs described the lived practice of working with language and culture in language immersion education. this study principally revealed how the lived experience of ojibwe language immersion educators is important, challenging, and rewarding. the dynamic synergy of culture, language, and content that happens in ojibwe language immersion requires competent and creative educators who are knowledgeable about language, cultural traditions, and teaching practice. this study concludes by noting how the lived experience of immersion school practitioners as cultural workers is marked not only by excellence in practice and professionalism, but by dedication, responsibility, and hope for the future of the culture, language, and tribal nation itself. keywords first nations education, hermeneutics, indigenous language, language immersion, language revitalization, phenomenology revitalization of the ojibwe language is among the most important issues facing anishinaabe communities in canada and the united states. speaker numbers are approaching historically low levels, with many communities having only a handful of fluent speakers remaining. the creation of enriched second language programs in schools represents one widespread attempt to revitalize language and culture (mccarty, 2003). language immersion education is one such model that employs a second language to teach academic and cultural knowledge throughout the entire day. indigenous peoples such as the maori, native hawaiians, haudenosaunee, navaho, and arapaho effectively employ language immersion as a part of their revitalization efforts (aguilera, 2008; hinton, 2001; hornberger, 2008). a focus on culture is an important component of immersion education programs, particularly so for indigenous languages (fortune & tedick, 2008). a limiting factor for many indigenous immermcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 2 sion efforts is the lack of licensed educators who possess the necessary linguistic and cultural competencies required for such a position (hinton, 2003; reyhner, 2003; richards & burnaby, 2008). the professional and personal lives of many immersion teachers often become intertwined, and the long hours and hard work are often accompanied by a deep commitment and a sense of satisfaction. the teaching staff in many indigenous immersion schools is composed of individuals from a variety of educational and linguistic backgrounds. university-educated second language learners with advanced degrees work alongside traditionally educated first speaker elders. understanding the experience of the few individuals presently engaged in ojibwe language immersion instruction is important to helping communities retain and recruit personnel and to ensuring that this system of education maintains a sense of quality, growth, and sustainability. this hermeneutic phenomenological study explored the experiences of ojibwe language immersion educators implementing culture-based content within a schoolbased setting. as a former ojibwe language immersion teacher, and a current teachereducator of students who would one day like to be ojibwe language teachers, this study was an important opportunity to explore the unique experience of those dedicated individuals who are making the language immersion experience possible in schoolbased programs. educator perspectives were collected through semi-structured small group discussions and analyzed using van manen’s (1997) interpretative framework. initial themes were discerned from significant statements made by participants and were later refined into a number of essential themes through hermeneutic dialogue with participants, thematic analysis, and participant and researcher hermeneutic reflection. hermeneutic phenomenology phenomenology is concerned with the meaning of real world experiences toward a given phenomenon (creswell, 2007). van manen (1997) noted the focus of phenomenological inquiry is to discover the essence of lived experience, or “that which makes a thing what it is” (p. 177). phenomenology is a methodology dedicated to understanding the everyday lived experience of people in myriad situations and environments. hermeneutics, described as the science of interpretation by brian smith, is “a systematic approach to interpreting a text, firstly analyzing the whole text, then parts of the text and comparing the two interpretations for conflicts and for understanding the whole in relation to the parts and vice versa” (1998, p. 125). van manen (1997) described his approach to human science research as a synthesis of each respective paradigm: it is the phenomenological and hermeneutical study of human existence: phenomenology because it is the descriptive study of lived experience (phenomena) in the attempt to enrich lived experience by mining its meaning; hermeneutics because it is the interpretive study of the expressions and objectifications (texts) of lived experience in the attempt to determine the meaning embodied in them. (p. 38) as a methodological framework for research, the use of hermeneutic phenomenology has specific implications for both the collection and analysis of data, as well as a broader philosophical orientation that focuses knowledge building as a pedagogical act. both the researcher and the participants are involved in the exploration and interpretation of the phenomenon of study (wojnar & swanson, 2007). this is particularly important to an indigenous research study that values the importance of dialogic mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 3 conversation between the researcher and participants. as a research methodology, hermeneutic phenomenology is not characterized by static procedures or approaches. a discovery orientation is necessary, as is a willingness on the part of the researcher to be open to new and unexpected findings (finlay, 2009; lauver, 2010; laverty, 2003). van manen suggested the researcher should be sensitive to emergent needs, and not be “obstructed by pre-conceptions and theoretical notions” (1997, p. 184). laverty (2003) summarized van manen’s (1997) approach as requiring “an ability to be reflective, insightful, sensitive to language, and constantly open to experience” (p. 16). the present study employed laverty’s (2003) flexible approach to building understanding “using whatever approaches are responsive to particular questions and subject matter” (p. 16). hermeneutic text and language “for research purposes lived experience has to be fixed in texts, which then always needs interpretation” (lindseth & norberg, 2004, p. 148). robertson-malt (1999) noted the strength of a hermeneutic phenomenological methodology in moving beyond “the superficial explanation or description of an experience that the ‘text’ first offers” (p. 292). the interpretation of text necessarily involves that experience be contextualized within “the world of language and social relationships, and the inescapable historicity of all understanding” (finlay, 2009, p. 11). the social context, or lived experience, of language use is particularly important within the dynamic and complex relationships that comprise indigenous language revitalization. as stated by van manen (1997), “the object of human science research is essentially a linguistic project: to make some aspect of our lived world, of our lived experience, reflectively understandable and intelligible” (pp. 125-126). in the production and interpretation of texts referencing lived experience, acknowledging the significance of the language used is an integral part of the overall conceptual design. ricoeur (1981) affirmed the “lingual condition of all experience” (p. 115) and van manen contextualized the central place of language within hermeneutic phenomenological inquiry: we are able to recall and reflect on experiences thanks to language. human experience is only possible because we have language. language is so fundamentally part of our humanness that heidegger (1971) proposed that language, thinking, and being are one. (1997, pp. 38-39) hermeneutic phenomenology is attentive to the notion of multiple interpretations, metaphor, analogy, and the range of meaning that language provides. gadamer (2004) wrote, “in language the order and structure of our experience itself is originally formed and constantly changed… it is from language as a medium that our whole experience of the world, and especially hermeneutical experience, unfolds” (p. 453). context of the study the study is dedicated to the describing the cultural and language-based experiences of ojibwe language immersion educators who are currently employed in p-12 licensed programs. the challenges posed for indigenous language immersion educators are many, and the qualifications necessarily high. bringing together the voices of practitioners from the field is a powerful way of generating some collective understanding of our work and needs. the linguistic and cultural interpretations being made within immersion schools today will have great implications for the sustainability of both mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 4 language and culture. nieto (2010) referred to the role people play as “agents of culture” (p. 136) who have responsibility for the creation and transformation of cultural reality. indigenous immersion practitioners are cultural agents by vocation, working to adapt ancient linguistic and cultural codes for a dynamic present and future. gaining an understanding of immersion teacher experience through collegiality, friendship, and conversation is a means of describing a challenging practice in a constructive and hope-giving way. an ojibwe language immersion school is defined in the study as any school-based program that is committed to teaching subject content matter through the ojibwe language 100% of the time. the programs included in this study include both on and off-reservation programs, and include children of primarily indigenous but also non-indigenous descent. the study refers to first nations people using the terms indigenous, native, or the ojibwe language term anishinaabe. methods specific procedures the study involved interviewing small teams of ojibwe language immersion educators about their experiences integrating culture-based programming within a language immersion program. teaching teams from three similar, but separate schools, were included to allow for a broader range of perspectives and experiences. follow-up dialogue with individual participants occurred after the initial team interviews. study participants eight participants who presently work in ojibwe language immersion programs were included in the study. each of these individuals is a first or second language speaker of ojibwe and has direct experience as an immersion educator or support person. participants ranged in age from young adults to tribal elders and included three men and five women. half of the participants have teaching degrees or certification attained through formal education programs. the others achieved state-based teaching qualification through eminence credentialing in indian language or culture. all participants are ojibwe anishinaabe people and are enrolled in a minnesota, wisconsin, north dakota, or ontario tribal community. data collection procedures the research process used a combination of small group interviews with teaching teams, hermeneutic interviews with individual participants, and reflective journaling by the researcher. initial interviews were completed within the first two months of the study, and reflective journaling and hermeneutic interviews occurred over the next six months. small group interviews. small group interviews comprised the primary means of data generation and collection. i served as the facilitator or moderator of the small group discussions in the protocol, but also engaged in parts of the dialogue as a coparticipant. all questions were asked bilingually, and participants were informed they could choose whatever language they wanted to use in whole or in part for each answer. interviews were audio recorded with field notes taken by myself. all interviews were transcribed in a line-by-line format, and i completed any required translation from ojibwe to english. member checks were used to ensure validity. i asked participants to share their experiences and perspectives on how cultural content may best be integrated within an immersion school setting. hermeneutic interview reflection. as a part of the interpretative process, i reviewed mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 5 interview-generated materials with participants. hermeneutic conversation took place through a series of oral and electronic exchanges during the study period. checking the accuracy of the transcript and any translations i made were key initial tasks. the hermeneutic conversation was moreover focused on reviewing the thematic summary that had been compiled by myself. both revisions and additions to the thematic content resulted in a process whereby both the interviewer and the interviewee weighed the appropriateness of each item by asking, “is this what the experience is really like?” (van manen, 1997, p. 99). this stage of the research design is oriented as an interpretive conversation wherein both partners selfreflectively orient themselves to the “interpersonal or collective ground that brings the significance of the phenomenological question into view” (van manen, 1997, p. 99). the electronic nature of the text-based dialogue was true to the hermeneutic orientation of the research design. reflective journal. i maintained a reflective journal throughout the research process. although bracketing is not a part of an interpretative phenomenological approach, grbich (2007) added, “you will need to keep a reflective journal recording your own experiences, personal assumptions and views” (p. 91). hermeneutics suggests the assumptions, perspectives, and biases of the researcher are not only embedded in the study but, as laverty (2003) noted, are “essential to the interpretive process” (p. 17). data analysis and interpretation within hermeneutic phenomenology, data analysis and interpretation is a longitudinal process. the process of analyzing language and identifying thematic content began during the first interview and continued until the end of the study. interview text from the small group discussions and hermeneutic conversations was put through an interpretive process that “aimed at generating a deeper understanding of the topic by facilitating a fusion of the world views of both participant and researcher” (smith, 1998, p. 124). there was some important common ground between the participants and me: all belong to the ojibwe nation, work in ojibwe immersion, and speak both english and ojibwe. although hermeneutic phenomenology is not intended to adhere to any strict procedures by definition, some guidelines for data collection and analysis originate in the six key research activities listed by van manen (1997): 1. turning to the phenomenon, which seriously interests us and commits us to the world. 2. investigating experience as we live it rather than as we conceptualize it. 3. reflecting on the essential themes, which characterize the phenomenon. 4. describing the phenomenon through the art of writing and rewriting. 5. maintaining a strong and oriented pedagogical relation to the phenomenon. 6. balancing the research context by considering parts and whole. these six activities formed the basis for the analytic framework used in the study. the first and second of these research themes were particularly important to the development of the study. the experience of the indigenous language immersion educator, as culture agent, is of deep interest to the participants and myself alike. this profession requires a holistic investment of spirit, heart, mind, voice, and hand. one’s personal and professional lives become intimately and necessarily intertwined in such an involved job capacity. as one participant noted in hermeneutic discourse: this is like nothing else i have ever done. i’ve been a teacher before but not like mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 6 this. it takes every part of me: my spirit, my heart, my mind, my body. i breathe and sleep and dream this stuff now. sure it’s hard but i can see my life, our lives, our peoples’ lives and hopes and stories going into the future now. that’s why it means so much, that’s the why behind it all. notably, the experience being investigated is profoundly lived by all involved in the study. while a focus on one’s conceptualized or idealized practice versus one’s lived practice is a potential caveat in any such discussion, the common truths that emerged from the small group conversations were mutually grounding for all participants. as one team member summarized, “this has been helpful to me to understand all the ways i am not alone in this and to keep the big picture in mind. it is good to know that my co-workers also feel and go through these things.” thematic analysis. van manen stated that the identification and reflection on themes that characterize the phenomenon is a vital research activity (1997). thematic reduction and analysis is a core part of any phenomenological study albeit with differing approaches to achieving each (finlay, 2009; laverty, 2003). van manen further noted, “phenomenological themes may be understood as the structures of experience. so when we analyze a phenomenon, we are trying to determine what the themes are, the experiential structures that make up the experience” (1997, p. 79). the production of interview texts is precursor to the analysis process. van manen (1997) suggested three key ways of isolating or identifying themes from the text: 1. the wholistic or sententious approach. 2. the selective or highlighting approach. 3. the detailed or line-by-line approach. because of the length of the interviews, and the number of lines of text that were generated from each conversation, the second of these approaches was selected as an efficient and practical way to determine thematic content. based on the selective or highlighting approach, several of what lauver (2010) described as “significant statements and key words” (p. 292) were coded from the verbatim texts. these significant statements were reworded as initial themes that were ultimately summarized as essential themes. these major or essential themes were shared with the participants as a part of member checking, as well as to ensure their continued participation and reflection. the procedure suggested by robertson-malt (1999) was applied at this point in the study: these themes (essentials) were then revisited with the participants, who at this point of the study became co-researchers through their validation and guidance of the emergent themes. during this phase i worked with individual participants in an effort to weigh the appropriateness of each essential item by asking: ‘is this what the experience is really like?’ (p. 295). it was an emotional journey for many participants, with several commenting that this research protocol was a necessary intervention to understanding what their work was truly about: we find ourselves so extraordinarily busy, with teaching, with curriculum writing, with translation, with talking with parents, with making up words, with trying to make sure these kids feel and learn why we are doing this . . . that we never have a chance to really think through or describe or understand our purpose and what all this really means. this is the “step away” from the work mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 7 that was needed to see it all and reinvigorate as well. determining, summarizing, and writing essential themes was an iterative process that took many drafts. in this regard, van manen’s fourth key research activity of describing a phenomenon “through the art of writing and rewriting” (1997, p. 30) was fulfilled. the extended dialogue with participants, and a constant revisiting of the original research questions throughout this phase, ensured that van manen’s fifth key research activity of “maintaining a strong and oriented pedagogical relation to the phenomenon” (1997, p. 31) was also achieved. van manen’s sixth key research activity, considering parts and whole as a means of establishing research context, was key to the ultimate refinement and determination of thematic content. differentiating between incidental and essential themes is a vital determination in hermeneutic phenomenology (van manen, 1997). this process is a part of the hermeneutic circle, whereby the dialectic consideration of parts and whole is key to the process of developing an understanding of the phenomenon: the hermeneutic circle is a metaphor for understanding and interpretation, which is viewed as a movement between parts (data) and whole (evolving understanding of the phenomenon), each giving meaning to the other such that understanding is circular and iterative… understanding emerges in the process of dialogue between the researcher and the text of the research. (ajjawi & higgs, 2007, pp. 622-623) following the suggestion of robertson-malt (1999), “commonalities in essential themes between the various interviews were identified which guided the uncovering of . . . essences” (p. 295). the determination of a final number of essences is “seen to reveal the essential nature of the lived experience” (robertson-malt, 1999, p. 295), or as noted by van manen, “transform lived experience into a textual expression of its essence in such a way that the effect of the text is at once a reflexive re-living and a reflective appropriation of something meaningful” (van manen, 1997, p. 36). as noted by ricoeur (1981), “the reference of the linguistic order back to the structure of experience (which comes to language in the assertion) constitutes, in my view, the most important phenomenological presupposition of hermeneutics” (p. 118). an extra interpretive lens was required in the co-translation of material from ojibwe to english. once ideas from practice were transmitted into words, and the thematic summaries of those words agreed upon, then began the task of interpreting these constructs into english. although a step removed from the original discourse, translation may have been strengthening to the interpretive process. as noted by one participant, “it’s always difficult to turn the words into english, but it’s something we have to do to help others understand. it’s helpful to us as well, as we really have to be deliberate in what words we choose. i’m more careful with english when i’m translating than when i’m just speaking it.” study findings data collected from the small group interviews, individual hermeneutic conversations with participants, and the researcher-kept phenomenological journal were used to generate 32 initial themes that were further summarized to eight essential themes. from the different interviews there were a total of 332 significant statements: (a) 101 from site one interview, (b) 114 from site two interview, and (c) 117 from site three interview. initial themes were derived from a single significant statement or several related mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 8 significant statements. the process involved constant interaction between the data and myself as initial themes were combined, separated, entirely reworked, or refined. van manen explained that it was an expected part of the reduction process: “theme formulation is at best a simplification. we come up with a theme formulation but immediately feel that it somehow falls short, that it is an inadequate summary of the notion” (1997, p. 87). all initial themes were revised several times. each of the three teaching team interviews shared 25 of 32 initial themes in common. no additional themes were suggested by any of the interview participants. a difficulty cited by almost all participants was the lack of broad understanding even within their immediate school communities about the nature of their work. participants related that the recent emergence of their programs meant there is little established definition for their lived practice, and little opportunity to reflect on its meaning or purpose. almost all participants noted considerable dissatisfaction that the traditional experience of world-language immersion educators was often generalized to include indigenous language immersion practitioner experience and work. as summarized in my research journal, our work is categorically different in indigenous immersion. we have the same content obligations and language fluency requirements . . . but there is an expectation (and need) from our communities of our students achieving true cultural competency (not just knowledge of cultural products or practices, but at the deeper level of cultural perspective). to accomplish this, we have to be people who live this worldview – if we are to ever hope for the children to do the same. this means significant learning and transformation for most of us – not only in learning new things, but also in terms of divesting the experience of colonization that has in part made us who we are today. this may also mean changing what it means to be “a teacher.” essential themes after the final list of initial themes was derived from interview and hermeneutic conversation data, further reduction was necessary in order to generate a list of major themes. table 1 lists each of the essential themes identified in the study. the listing of major themes is representative of key facets of immersion teachers’ experience teaching culture and language. table 1 essential themes of immersion educator culture and language experience and source initial themes 1. indigenous language immersion educator experience is inclusive, broadening, holistic, and supports the cultural, linguistic, content knowledge, and identity needs of participants. 2. indigenous language immersion educator practice requires the collaborative effort of students, staff members, parents, community members, language learners, and language speakers. 3. indigenous language immersion teachers must have or attain the requisite skills, knowledge, understanding, and materials to be effective. 4. the teaching of language and culture is complicated within indigenous language immersion educator practice by schoolbased structures. mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 9 5. culture, language, and academic objectives must be clearly defined and prioritized within indigenous language immersion educator practice. 6. indigenous language immersion teaching experience is challenging, important, and rewarding. 7. indigenous language immersion teaching requires learning from others and connecting with the past and present for the future. 8. indigenous language immersion educator experience is about leadership, nationhood, spirit, and hope. an explication of each essential theme is made in the following section. direct reference is made to initial themes from which essential themes were derived. indigenous language immersion educator experience this first essential theme speaks to the definitional and applicative foundations of immersion education teacher practice. not only is such practice supportive of the needs of students, there is tremendous benefit for practitioners involved in the delivery of culturally based programs. importantly, indigenous immersion education systems need not necessarily be confined to reservation settings alone. the key idea noted by one participant is that “ojibwe language immersion is for everywhere in this modern world.” participants reported identity development for indigenous children is at the heart of the immersion effort. they reported that non-indigenous children who participated in immersion programs gained a greater appreciation and acceptance of native peoples, cultures, and communities: the thing i saw as a change in a nonnative child this year was that american indians are around and okay in this world too, outside the reservations: “you’re anishinaabe and i like you.” we can make big impacts on those people who might have some negative stereotypes they are carrying around. immersion education is demonstrably improving intercultural competency for all students by offering strong culture and language programming. one teacher noted that students were interested and appreciative when exposed to world languages such as spanish and chinese. the programs surveyed in the study are obligated to fulfill general state academic standards. each of these schools has a set of english language testing instruments that are used as a part of standardized testing. programs have to demonstrate that they are meeting the academic needs of students through such testing protocols. my research journal noted this challenge of practice midway throughout the study in that, “all teachers feel the stress of having to educate children in the target language only to be measured by their performance on an english-language standardized test that does not represent the way the children think or relate knowledge.” despite the struggles, participants reported that working in an immersion program is beneficial to creating a supportive network for practice. immersion creates a language community that brings together people for the main purpose of using the target language and practicing cultural norms. speaking one’s language and knowing one’s culture leads to lifelong fulfillment in terms of identity: in knowing my language and culture i know that i am anishinaabe no matter where i am at, and i am proud to be anishinaabe no matter where i am. that is mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 10 something special we can give our children, that powerful feeling. all of the educators valued having a place to go on a daily basis where they are able to converse with so many adults and children who are interested in, and value, the native language. while not all elements of cultural and linguistic experience can be a part of school life, staff members and students benefit greatly from the rich community expression that has developed in these centers. indigenous language immersion educator practice facilitates collaborative effort the revitalization of an indigenous language is a worthy endeavor that often reconnects people with a language from which they are two or three generations removed. there are many different roles that need to be played in the creation and maintenance of a speaking and learning community. indigenous immersion educators play a lead role in these intentional communities, and often help coordinate the efforts of others such as elders, parents and community members. participants broadly agreed that the involvement of families and community members is both important and meaningful to everyone involved, but that the burden of this organization often falls on them to arrange. immersion school teachers spend a great deal of time with children, often teaching both core and specialty subjects. one participant explained that immersion teacher work transcends the work requirements he had as a regular teacher in the state system. this is particularly true in that there is more than academic content that we are trying to get across in our practice: i want to see them stand strong as anishinaabe people. i really do care a lot about those children that i instruct. i don’t think of it as just teaching those children, they also teach me about the way that i am as an anishinaabe person and how i must continue to be a kind and good individual. time is not necessarily the critical variable in establishing meaningful relationships; rather, it is the care, attention, motivation, and effort that children observe and experience that helps make the practice of ojibwe language immersion educators so extraordinary. requisite skills of effective immersion language immersion teachers immersion teaching work is necessarily complex due to the unique intersection of language, culture, and academic content objectives. a shortage of individuals who are highly proficient speakers, knowledgeable of traditional native culture, and either licensed or trained as classroom teachers has been a limiting factor in either the opening or growth of each school: it is not just the language; there is a reason why they must be taught about cultural ways. like the drum or the pipe, there is a reason why they must know about these things. it is not enough to speak the language well as one must know how to use it. the language is a spiritual language, you have to know about it, and what the language means. indigenous language immersion teacher practice is dependent upon a proficient knowledge of the language and cultural skill. having a rich cultural base ensures that the language continues to be spoken with its original quality and repertoire of meaning: this is especially important at the present when so much innovation and change is required for linguistic and cultural survival. mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 11 given the present climate of standardized testing and required content standards, mastery of western or mainstream knowledge is a significant part of immersion school life and practice today. schools are mandated to procure highly qualified teachers, so licensure is increasingly important. all participants asserted that licensure should not be the determining or primary qualification for being able to work in an immersion school: it was almost as if i could not trust myself to be of any help as i lacked a teaching license. i was only able to speak the ojibwe language well. this was all that i felt i knew, that anishinaabe ojibwe language. this was all. i didn’t have an understanding of teacher training, and i didn’t have any professional experience. i went ahead and did my work there well though. immersion schools have responded to the need for professional teacher skills by bringing in professional presenters and encouraging staff members to seek relevant in-service opportunities. while there seems to be broad agreement that language and cultural skills are important and should be increasingly recognized, professional teacher programs can help educators meet the unique challenges of working with children in school-based settings. while each of the ojibwe language immersion schools offer in-service opportunities for staff members throughout the year, the responsibility of acquiring necessary core skills rests with teachers themselves. none of the individuals interviewed in the study felt fully prepared for the diverse set of responsibilities and duties in ojibwe language immersion work at the onset of their careers. participants commented on the need for increased language, culture, or pedagogical knowledge. even after many years in the field, teachers still felt they only knew a little about how to best do immersion instruction. participants agreed that finding the right ojibwe words, or words that children can make sense of, is an ongoing task in every subject area they teach. consulting with teammates, elders, and other immersion professionals is a useful means of finding a way forward in these circumstances, but this requires that indigenous immersion teachers be active in their pursuit of knowledge. one participant noted that something as basic as knowing how to ask for information and navigate one’s way through the cultural matrix of a community is a learned skill that takes perseverance and determination. the teaching of language and culture within school-based structures the difficulty of transforming mainstream school-based programming into a culturally and linguistically indigenous oriented system has been taken on by a number of dynamic teams working in ojibwe language immersion. elders and first speakers work alongside language learners to create spaces where the ojibwe language is used to describe all school-based routines and activities in an indigenous way. all participants felt that the cultural value of mutual collaboration and cooperation is at the heart of every ojibwe language immersion classroom. while ojibwe language immersion programs are using many of the same physical and organizational structures as other schools, the way that educators feel they are using them is fundamentally different. wrote one participant, “we don’t just learn about culture in our classroom, we live culture.” over the course of research-based discussions, participants identified several limitations to school-based programming. however, immersion educators focused more on the possibilities for cultural growth mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 12 and awareness than the limitations. almost every classroom begins each morning with a thanksgiving speech and an offering of tobacco. entire programs come together for this event, and children share the responsibility of helping start the day. children spend a lot of time outdoors, and most programs have an environmental focus that ties in strongly to indigenous life-ways. field trips, visits from community members, and an attempt to link cultural themes to academic content are important ways through which immersion teachers feel they are staying true to the program mission in their practice. participants note that children commonly learn about practices such as drumming, singing, offering tobacco, harvesting wild rice, making maple syrup, trapping, beading, and dancing. one teacher related that the children learned to treat the drum respectfully once they better understood how it was to be used and a little about how it is made. culture, language, and academic objectives defining and balancing cultural, linguistic, and academic objectives in indigenous language immersion education is a vital point of practice. all teams felt that academic content standards or language objectives were available to them. for ojibwe language immersion teachers to act as true cultural workers, clarifying what is meant by culture determines whether or not students learn about simple artifacts or are ultimately exposed and encouraged to adopt authentic perspectives and worldviews. decisions about culture also have direct implications for what is taught, particularly if a school or language immersion practitioner is observant of an indigenous epistemology. the broad sentiment was that it is better to be clear about what can and will be accomplished rather than teach culture in a mitigated and indiscriminate manner. culture is often framed in terms of products, practices, and perspectives within second language and culture pedagogy. these designations have been helpful to some participants in creating learning standards or goals that can be achieved within a school-based context such as lesson or unit planning. one participant related it in the following way: i try to use that approach when we talk about culture. there is an object that is used, there is a thing you do, and then there is a certain belief you have associated with that so that is what i try to do as i am teaching. and you can do a lot with that by having the actual objects in your classroom, making the objects yourself, and talking about how those three bigger ideas are interrelated. a common theme for all participants is that language and culture are mutually dependent, and ultimately inseparable. language immersion systems explore each of the three main facets of culture: if we have an immersion program, we know our teachings and where our language came from and that is one of the most sacred and holy experiences of ours. how powerful that is. i mean we always say, “you can’t take the culture out,” but you literally can’t. to try to pull that out and take pieces and parts of it out won’t work anyway, so culture is going to find a way in. a number of participants described their belief that many aspects of culture cannot or should not be talked about using english. the ojibwe language is the natural form of expression for ojibwe culture and is inherently oriented to teaching all aspects of cultural and community life. challenges present themselves in the transition to school-based systems of teaching and learning and the western knowledge-based mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 13 academic standards upon which the majority of the instructional program is based. each teaching team noted that academic content, linguistic, and culture-learning goals are not always mutually supportive. quite often the words required to talk about a modern-day concept are not readily available. participants believed there is a beneficial thrust to invent new words and uses of the language to ensure future viability. while all participants noted it is exciting to be at the forefront of such a movement, it is also a profound responsibility to be shaping the way the language will be spoken in the future: “i work with my classroom elders the best i can in this regard, and modern dictionaries are helpful. it is worrisome though that what i teach my students may shape the future of how our language is spoken.” the teaching teams consulted in the study endeavor to achieve content and language learning objectives through a cultural framework of practice. this requires considerable planning work to ensure each goal is evenly represented. rewards and challenges of indigenous language immersion teaching experience one of the most striking features of each teaching team interviewed was how resolute and committed they each are to fulfilling language and content goals in a way that is culturally authentic and adaptive. the resultant work responsibilities are far beyond what might be expected of a regular classroom teacher: • translating content standards and concepts; • determining cultural inclusiveness and appropriateness; • researching and developing requisite vocabulary; • authoring curriculum units; • developing comprehensive assessments; • learning the local language and culture of the community; • gaining the trust of elders and the community; and • serving as a role model for culture and language. the exhausting regimen of language immersion instruction work is not for everyone. all of the teaching teams represented in this study have experienced significant attrition with the high workload being a suggested contributing factor: language preservation efforts place tremendous pressures on teachers of language. the pressures of setting and students affect who will teach and the skills that are needed… this is true in all teaching fields, but even more of an issue in native american language owing to the small numbers of fluent speakers, the task at hand, and the lack of clarity in the field. (silverthorne, p. 106, 1997) it takes a remarkable individual with the required skill set for the job as well as the ability and determination to handle a demanding work assignment. a special resilience might be necessary given the number and type of criticisms that participants described over the course of the study. ojibwe language immersion teaching work is a challenging profession. serving such a broad range of stakeholders often means being subject to multiple criticisms. participants identified a number of criticisms that make their jobs difficult. these range from concerns about materials or assessments, the quality of dialect or language used by staff members, to the authenticity of cultural expression. the use of print and audiovisual multimedia resources in schools continues to be perceived as a threat to the oral tradition by many community mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 14 members. further community concerns reported by participants included the quality and limitations of student language use. what is important, participants believe, is that students are learning the language and finding enough value to want to use it every day. ensuring that children authentically adopt a comprehensive indigenous perspective is much more complex than simply gaining an appreciation of worldview. while language immersion teachers do their utmost to maintain a native perspective in their practice this can be difficult given the limitations of available resources: say we are talking about the solar system and we have come to a discussion of what we are going to say about this. what are our teachings about this? our elders say we don’t know anything about that. where do we go? that is when we reach out. that takes time. we must be careful to design lessons so that whatever we put forth is accurate. earning the respect, trust, and support of the community is both an associated responsibility and a reward for an ojibwe language immersion educator. the active role an immersion teacher plays in revitalizing indigenous culture through language fits well with nieto’s description of an “agent of culture” (2010, p. 136). immersion programs and situations are intentional ones. a conscious decision has to be made to both create and maintain a speaking environment that would not otherwise exist for students. the goal of the efforts is for the intentionality aspect of speaking to one day become unnecessary: it is like what was said about speaking our language, where it just becomes the norm of behavior again instead of the extraordinary where our anishinaabe life would just be there. it’s a part of our lives and it’s expected, you know? many participants described how fulfilling it was to see children take the lead on ceremonial protocols that were needed in the school and community. it is through the voices of the children that classroom practitioners can hear the words of school elders, or perhaps one’s own parents or grandparents, continue on. being an immersion teacher is a tremendously challenging, important, and yet rewarding position. as noted by one participant, it makes those difficult moments worth it when you get those affirmations from elders, or the moments when the children go and use the language all on their own. there is something about that sound. maybe we are lucky that we get to see stuff that maybe most people don’t get to see? we are unbelievably lucky. connecting with the past and present for the future as a system of education that is founded on culture and language, it is essential that traditional ways of speaking the native language form the basis for new innovations. while new linguistic forms and meanings are an inevitable part of language change (llamas, mullany, & stockwell, 2007), underlying meanings, or the spirit of the language, should be preserved throughout surface changes. immersion school practitioners rely heavily on the contributions of elders and master speakers to achieve the best quality of language in the classroom. written resources are useful sources of language samples and vocabulary choices. it is the attendant elders and master speakers, however, who give each program the context for how to interpret and use language. this is particularly important when increasing numbers of language teachers are second language learners themselves. mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 15 the team approach to classroom instruction is an effective way of capitalizing on the collective skills of staff members. younger staff members noted how working with elders is a rewarding and fulfilling experience. one of the young participants shared that being involved in language immersion has been powerfully reconnecting for herself and her family: my grandmother went to boarding school so did not feel comfortable passing on the language… when i had this opportunity given to me i just said that this was something i was passionate about for her and for my family and my community and for myself. i thought that it was something that needed to be done. another team member affirmed that working with elders on a day-to-day basis is a valuable way to receive ongoing guidance, particularly about developing words and learning how to use them: this is a discussion that we started to have with the elders, and what we are after is what are the true anishinaabe ways of doing and when is it appropriate to talk about x, y, or z. i don’t know if anyone has ever made any serious study of this, but i think it’s something that we are very interested in doing to get back to how we should be. the work between classroom elders, master speakers, and younger or second language learner teachers is a mutually rewarding partnership that strengthens the program for everyone involved. ojibwe language immersion educators are on the cusp of creating a meaningful future for the culture and language through the dynamic work of the present. indeed, indigenous immersion schools are a cynosure where traditional concepts and beliefs meet the demands of new categorizations and definitions of knowledge. cultural and linguistic practices can be adapted to fit the routines and structures found in schools. all participants affirmed how some creative effort can find the application of western concept knowledge standards in traditional activities such as the moccasin game, maple syrup gathering, or snowshoeing. connections have to be thoughtfully made to ensure that authentic cultural perspectives remain a part of the instruction and approach. learning what the past and present have to teach in preparation for the future is the best means of creating a system of education that is culturally sustainable and authentically indigenous no matter what surface changes arise. leadership, nationhood, spirit, and hope participants summarized the concept of language revitalization for indigenous people as the restoration of identity through culture and language. a school-based language immersion approach takes advantage of contemporary organizational systems to teach children in a culturally and linguistically rich environment. the intention is not to replicate english language education within a native language, but rather to create a broad reinterpretation that is consistent with an indigenous understanding of the world: the whole reason for doing this isn’t just about helping kids be successful in school. this is a nation-building project. this has to do with more than just learning your academics and being able to go to college and having a successful career later, this has more to do with waking our people back up again and realizing that our language and who we are is at the root of everything that gives us a right to claim to be anishinaabe. mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 16 indigenous language immersion work was described as a part of the larger movement to restore a broad sense of identity such that indigenous nationhood critically means something in the future. nationhood and identity are more than a tribal membership list or blood quantum calculation. language and culture must be at the heart of an education system that has identity restoration as a goal. one participant asked a profound question in this regard: “how could i be anishinaabe if i did not know the language and culture?” the language teachers in the three schools surveyed for this study are at the forefront of a bigger movement of selfdetermination and empowerment through education. participants shared that starting each school was at times a slow and difficult process. the process of creating the schools took great acts of courage, faith, and leadership. i reflected in my hermeneutic journal about leaving canada because of the leading efforts of native language educators in the united states. for ojibwe anishinaabe people in canada it seemed there had been a lot of discussion for a long time, but nothing ever happened. when i was asked to go work for this new, small program in the u.s. i was hesitant but intrigued. here was an opportunity to do something i had dreamed of for years. when i visited the school, and saw the incredible potential that was there to actually make a real and lasting difference, i knew what my decision must be. being a leader in the indigenous language immersion movement has meant enduring challenges and in some cases personal sacrifice. but the tremendous sense of belief in what is being accomplished is a powerfully motivating force for ojibwe immersion educators. it also inspires hope in the communities that benefit from the existence of one of these school-based programs. hope for a positive future is at the very core of indigenous language immersion educator practice. hearing the native language spoken openly by children after decades of silence is a goal all teaching teams aspire to achieve. in the teaching of culture with and through language there is the hope that native children will develop a deep sense of traditional identity and values. some of the traditional perspectives study participants desire for students to develop include (a) kindness, (b) strength and resilience, (c) mutual cooperation, (d) selfreliance, (e) respect for one another, (f) diversity, and (g) belief in oneself. learning these values is meant to strengthen the sense of nationhood over the long term and to help children develop resilience to some of the negative stresses of community life: these are the kind of things that we need to get back to the days when our people had better manners and self-awareness. of course math and reading are important, but nothing is so important as cultural understanding. that is what is going to give the children deep roots so when the winds of drugs and alcohol and identity start blowing they’re not going to be so shaken as if they weren’t so deeply rooted. for non-native children and families who participate there is the hope of developing long-term mutual respect and appreciation of both languages and cultures. hope of a better future is at the root of immersion practice and implementation. a significant theme that characterizes indigenous language immersion practice is the belief in the role of the spirit. the ojibwe language is a highly spiritual one that is recognized as both a special gift and a responsibility by the community. spiritual mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 17 leaders believe that this is a time of sacred prophecy when things that have been lost or stolen throughout history will be renewed for the benefit of humankind in the future (benton-banai, 2010). language is a key to cultural learning, and it is within the spiritual teachings of the language that native identity exists. while individual stories differ, ojibwe language immersion teaching practice is powerful spiritual work that is deeply reconnecting and grounding: this entire journey of learning language has been more of a spiritual thing for me too. it’s not just going and learning a new word. it is a spiritual process for me, so i know what you mean when you say having a spiritual connection is important. the elements of leadership, hope, and spirit are important in the practice of indigenous language immersion educators. these educators are proving that while schoolbased learning is a compulsory activity, it is not necessarily one that is devoid of connection to language, culture and identity. we want students to come away with a real sense of who they are and a real sense of pride that we have something beautiful to offer to the rest of the world. we are part of this for a reason; we were put here for a reason to maintain balance in the world. we need to reclaim it and remember what that is and when it comes time to share it we need to be ready to do it and to have a good sense of who we are as a nation and that we are a distinct people on this earth. we are beautiful and just as valuable, and our gifts are as valuable as anything else that is on this world. as native peoples continue to define and redefine education systems, the role and place of language immersion education will become increasingly important. a generation of children who are empowered with their culture, language, sense of identity, and belief in their place in the world speaks to a future led by strong leaders. indigenous language immersion education is about nationhood, and as the experience of ojibwe immersion educators suggests, it is about hope. conclusion the study was born out of a personal desire to better understand the experience of a small but extraordinarily committed group of ojibwe language immersion educators. the research helped define many of the elements of ojibwe language immersion educator practice, but moreover framed the unique purpose and benefits of such efforts in teaching content and language framed by culture. the hermeneutic phenomenology of practice included the voices of several leading ojibwe language immersion educators, and drew upon my own experiences in the field. as we examined our thoughts, feelings, understandings, and perceptions about our practice through text, a number of unique revelations emerged from both our collective and unique individual experiences. the research protocol did not represent a “step back” or separation from the busyness of such intense practice; rather, it was a profound opportunity for deeper engagement with our respective thoughts and our community of practice and support. the practice of indigenous language immersion educators committed to the teaching of culture and language within school-based systems is an important, challenging, and rewarding experience. in a time of rapid cultural and linguistic change, language immersion teaching teams endeavor to create a positive future that is grounded in traditional cultural perspectives while meeting contemporary information needs. the knowledge requirements of native language immersion educators are great and mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 18 in continual need of advancement. the dynamic synergy of culture, language, and content that occurs on a daily basis in schools requires competent and creative educators. while a difficult and profound responsibility, these educators are rising to the challenge of the experience with integrity, respect, honor and dedication. the collaborative efforts that are led by these talented educators in their community and school-based programs is ensuring that future generations of ojibwe children will be proficient in their language and confident in their cultural identity and place in the world. references aguilera, d. (2008). academic success and cultural resiliency: language immersion education among indigenous communities. emigra working papers, 48. issn 20133804. ajjawi, r., & higgs, j. (2007). using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning. the qualitative report, 12(4), 612-638. benton-banai, e. (2010). the mishomis book: the voice of the ojibway (2nd ed.). st. paul, mn: university of minnesota press. creswell, j.w. (2007). qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). thousand oaks, ca: sage. finlay, l. (2009). debating phenomenological research methods. phenomenology & practice, 3(1), 6-25. fortune, t.w., & tedick, d.j. (2008). one way, two-way and indigenous immersion: a call for cross-fertilization. in t.w. fortune & d.j. tedick (eds.), pathways to multilingualism: evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp. 3-21). tonawanda, ny: multilingual matters. gadamer, h. (2004). truth and method (2nd ed. j.w. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. grbich, c. (2007). qualitative data analysis: an introduction. thousand oaks, ca: sage. hinton, l. (2001). language revitalization: an overview. in k. hale & l. hinton (eds.), the green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 3-18). san diego, ca: academic press. hinton, l. (2003). how to teach when the teacher isn’t fluent. in j. reyner, o.v. trujillo, r.l. carrasco, & l. lockard (eds.). nurturing native languages (pp. 79-92). flagstaff, az: northern arizona university. hornberger, n.h. (2008). can schools save indigenous languages? policy and practice on four continents. new york, ny: palgrave macmillan. lauver, l.s. (2010). the lived experience of foster parents of children with special needs living in rural areas. journal of pediatric nursing, 25(4), 289-298. laverty, s.m. (2003). hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. international journal of qualitative methods, 2(3), 21-35. lindseth, a., & norberg, a. (2004). a phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 18(2), 145-153. llamas, c., mullany, l., & stockwell, p. (2007). the routledge companion to sociolinguistics. new york, ny: routledge. mcinnes journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 19 mccarty, t.l. (2003). revitalising indigenous languages in homogenising times. comparative education, 39(2), 147-163. nieto, s. (2010). language, culture, and teaching: critical perspectives (2nd ed.). new york, ny: routledge. reyhner, j. (2003). native language immersion. in j. reyner, o.v. trujillo, r.l. carrasco, & l. lockard (eds.). nurturing native languages (pp. 1-6). flagstaff, az: northern arizona university. richards, m., & burnaby, b. (2008). restoring aboriginal languages: immersion and intensive language program models in canada. in t.w. fortune & d.j. tedick (eds.), pathways to multilingualism: evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp. 202-221). tonawanda, ny: multilingual matters. ricoeur, p. (1981). hermeneutics and the human sciences: essays on language, action and interpretation. new york, ny: cambridge university press. robertson-malt, s. (1999). listening to them and reading me: a hermeneutic approach to understanding the experience of illness. journal of advanced nursing, 29(2), 290-297. silverthorne, j.a. (1997). language preservation and human resources development. in j. reyhner (ed.), teaching indigenous languages (pp. 105-115). flagstaff, az: northern arizona university. smith, b.a. (1998). the problem drinker’s lived experience of suffering: an exploration using hermeneutic phenomenology. journal of advanced nursing, 27(1), 213222. van manen, m. (1997). researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). london, on, canada: the althouse press. wojnar, d.m., & swanson, k.m. (2007). phenomenology: an exploration. journal of holistic nursing, 25(3), 172-180. corresponding author: david w. jardine, phd retired, university of calgary email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics february 5, 2018 the author(s) 2018 guest editorial: “it’s february. it won’t last” david w. jardine preamble . . .the survivors stepping forward for their moment, blessed by our terrible need to know everything. (wallace, 1987, p. 48) do you have a picture of the pain? (ochs, 1967) the following small reflection was written around a year ago, but it has taken on new urgency for me with nancy moules’ (2017) and kate beamer’s (2017) writing late last year, and my own more recent (jardine, 2018), slightly unexpected response. the crux is this: why dwell on these matters? perhaps writing relieves the writer, but why then read? why listen to sufjan stevens’ (2015, 2017) songs about the death of his mother, or, even more harrowing, mount eerie’s (2017) songs about a wife lost to cancer, and a young child and husband now a bit lost in the world? it is not just a matter of empathizing or deep emotion, although it certainly is all that. it is also a chance for interpretive practice at a relatively safe distance, at relatively safe extent. to witness the careful articulation of suffering through reading writing (or listening to songs) that allows me to hold it at arm’s length or let it come nearer if and as i’m able. there is something important to be said for practicing while we can, and not waiting for events that might just overwhelm my own composure altogether. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 1 2 “it’s february. it won’t last” . . . the lord of yogis, sri jagan-mitrananda, says: lord of the earth, while this borrowed body is still healthy, without sickness or deterioration, take full advantage of it, acting in order to end your fear of sickness, death, and deterioration. once sickness, aging and deterioration and the like occur, you might remember to practice, but what can you do then? (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 157) while driving east into calgary for a bird watching class in a park along the bow river, around 8:20 am, someone on the local cbc am radio was speaking about the weather forecast – very strange indeed, february 8, 2016, 14 degrees celsius, with higher temperatures forecast for the next two days. the sun was flooding into the car window as we drove, more buttery-coloured every day. a great relief as we sighed into it. and the person on the radio says “my mantra right now is repeating ‘it’s february. it won’t last.’” yes. it is. and yes, it won’t. “familiarize yourself with it repeatedly. we call this repeated familiarization meditation” (tsong-kha-pa 2000, p. 110). yes. it is. and yes, it won’t. this is an increasingly familiar sort of “pop”-usage of the term “mantra,” meant to indicate a deliberately repeated phrase to calm the mind and prevent attachment. so, it was not exactly improperly used on the radio: don’t get used to this warm weather. don’t get fooled and drawn into a spell of anticipation and eventual regret. it is not going to last. i guess the pop equivalent is bursting someone’s bubble. of course, the trouble is that, improperly wielded, it becomes the sour-puss downer for all occasions: don’t enjoy that meal, it won’t last; don’t enjoy this life, it won’t last. from a buddhist point of view, however, this can be a good mantra if it is well practiced. it is trying to keep me alert and to prevent mere absorption in the whirling of the world. it is attempting to short-circuit or prevent future disappointment caused, not by today’s nice weather and the upcoming forecast, but caused by becoming falsely attached to it and then suffering the woe of its inevitable disappearance. there is a sort of cycle, here, that is profoundly commonplace. my hope for this weather to last forever (based, i supposed, on the lusty animal body wanting winter to end, wanting that vague threat lifted so i can let go into the winds and ways) causes me to grab at it, and grabbing at it jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 1 3 gives rise to a false feeling of prospective permanence, of “lasting,” thus accelerating the grasping and becoming attached to what is, in fact, an illusory reification of my own making: [it’s] like trying to grab cornstarch dissolved in water, the faster and harder and more desperately we try to seize these matters and cling to something permanent, the more substantial they feel and the more is aggravated our desire to grip even tighter. (jardine, 2012, p. 219) you can tell from this metaphorical sketch how easy it would be for ever-increasing panic to ensue, desperation to take over, and ever-accelerating pursuit to occur. over the course of 30 years of involvement in education and schools, this metaphor has been handy to have. too often i’ve witnessed the ravaging of attention that comes from this accelerated distraction, and too often i’ve seen how deliberately it is manipulated just under the surface of attention (jardine, 2016). the problem is, once “inside” this wheeling, the wheeling sustains itself and can only imagine relief inside of its own orbit of pursuit. this is why buddhism is often portrayed as a denial of desiring and why it might seem that enjoying this warm february air would be shunned. “my mantra right now is repeating ‘it’s february. it won’t last.’” “detachment” from this go-round– another commonplace coinage in describing buddhism - means precisely the opposite of what is easily supposed. such detachment is easily imagined to be a form of disaffected and dour countenance, a flatness of emotion and a sort of distance and dismalness. this is, i think, an incorrect reading of what buddhism requires and what purpose a mantra might serve. it imagines buddhism from inside the orbit of that in relation to which it is, in fact, exorbitant. once “detached” from the illusory belief that this weather might last forever, that this streaming sun might lift my seasonal, old english, grevoushede, once and for all, i can now, instead, utterly adore this warm sun far more profoundly than if i had simply glommed onto it in mindless “enjoyment.” this passing light becomes profoundly intense and surrounded with a penumbra of stillness, immediacy and radiance because it won’t last, not in spite of this fact. this is a phenomenological fact of meditative practice, that adoring radiant beings –like the smell of that aspen just cut from the tree the moths got last fall -is always under the caution of not simply falling for it and failing to remain alert to its ephemerality. fugitive. not lasting is what it is and experiencing it otherwise falsifies it under the weight of my meagre desires. “my mantra right now is repeating ‘it’s february. it won’t last’,” properly practiced, lets it be what it is. it releases it from my dour countenance and animal threat-body. it releases me from it as well. in such detachment, two things happen simultaneously. first, this warmth becomes itself, untethered from hopes for the future or laments for the past. “the existing thing does not simply jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 1 4 offer us a recognizable and familiar surface contour; it also has an inner depth of self-sufficiency that heidegger calls ‘standing-in-itself’” (gadamer, 1977, p. 226). with practice, i can learn to experience this warmth detached from me meddle. it becomes radiant (jardine, 2016). it “breaks forth as if from a center” (gadamer, 1989, p. 458). second, in such (however momentary) detachment, i become what i am: here, now, animal-body facing the sun and feeling the rouse of light, letting it be, letting it “stand in itself” and therefore letting myself stand there in its presence. my experience of this warmth becomes radiant. that is to say, it draws me out of my own wintery self-enclosure. it feels so good. but wait. also, here, “if you are obstructed . . . you will continue to think that you will remain in this life” (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 145). say it. this awash of warm butter sun might just be the last one i ever experience. now i can love it and not simply be attached to it. you can’t love something that you are attached to. by exercising the muscle of detachment –i’d call it the muscle of interpretation that “break[s] open the being of the object” (gadamer, 1989, p. 360) and shows its dependent co-arising, and thus shows the delusions of “substance” (p. 242) -this miniscule moment of disillusion, of (oh so trivial) suffering -“it’s february. it won’t last” -becomes an occasion for of practicing detachment in a case that is what bar-talk calls “a cheap round.” it doesn’t hurt so very much, and the payoff, if it leads to continued practice, is extraordinary: while this borrowed body is still healthy, without sickness or deterioration, take full advantage of it, acting in order to end your fear of sickness, death, and deterioration. once sickness, aging and deterioration and the like occur, you might remember to practice, but what can you do then? (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 157) the suffering induced by paying serious attention – interpretive attention --to this radio-friendly mantra is profoundly small, but, using this small gift as a locale for practice, frees its warmth from the captivity of ego-driven panic and attachment and, however momentarily, frees me from my fears of impermanence, of passing. take full advantage. references beamer, k. (2017). and coyote howled: listening to the call of interpretive inquiry. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 10. accessed on-line: http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/157. gadamer, h-g. (1977). philosophical hermeneutics. berkeley, ca: university of california press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method. new york, ny: continuum press. http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/157 jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 1 5 jardine, d.w. (2012). pedagogy left in peace: on the cultivation of free spaces in teaching and learning. new york, ny: bloomsbury publishing. jardine, d.w. (2016). in praise of radiant beings: a retrospective path through education, buddhism and ecology. charlotte nc: information age publishing. jardine, d. w. (2018). sunflowers, coyote, and five red hens. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 4. on-line: http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/167 moules, n. j. (2017) editorial. grief and hermeneutics: archives of lives and the conflicted character of grief. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 1. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5h708h8 mount eerie. (2017). a crow looked at me. compact disc. p.w. elverum & sun recordings. release date: march 24, 2017. ochs, p. (1967). crucifixion. from p. ochs (1967), the pleasures of the harbor. compact disc. a&m records. stevens, s. (2015). carrie and lowell. compact disc. asthmatic kitty records. catalog: akr099. release date: march 31, 2015. stevens, s. (2017). the greatest gift. mix tape. outtakes, remixes and demos from carrie and lowell. compact disc. asthmatic kitty records. catalog: akr134. release date: november 24, 2017 tsong-kha-pa. (2000). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (lam rim chen mo). vol. 1. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. wallace, b. (1987). the stubborn particulars of grace. toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/167 http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5h708h8 microsoft word hackettproof.docx corresponding author: j. edward hackett southern illinois university, carbondale doctoral candidate, editorial assistant library of living philosophers email: jhackett@siu.edu journal of applied hermeneutics march 15, 2013 the author(s) 2013 scheler, heidegger, and the hermeneutics of value j. edward hackett abstract in this paper, the author examines two different phenomenological frameworks for values: heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology and scheler’s phenomenology. given the popularity of hermeneutic phenomenology inspired by heidegger’s efforts, the author openly questions if values can be accommodated in that framework. the author suggests that those paying attention to the lived-experience of values consider scheler’s phenomenology of value as a more refined alternative to make sense of value-experience and cultural practices more generally. keywords ethics, givenness, heidegger, scheler, value in this paper, i explore the possibility of how value can be given in both heidegger and scheler. the “how of givenness” is the manner in which some thing can be given, or accessed phenomenologically. thus, if we take a look at both scheler and heidegger, we can address their conceptions of phenomenology as limiting and enabling the givenness of value. on a whole, phenomenology’s development issues more from heidegger’s influence than scheler. heidegger interprets value as present-at-hand and i argue this follows from the limits imposed by his hermeneutic phenomenology. values are ontic for heidegger. in scheler’s magnum opus the formalismus, he is silent on what values are exactly, but describes them as given. scholars familiar with scheler’s work will note that many times in the formalismus, scheler will assert the ideality of value and refer to the rank of values as an eternal order. however, he will never spell out the ontological nature of value nor how it is that they are eternal. thus, if we can establish the givenness of value itself and what that requires independently of either phenomenology, then we can recommend either heidegger or scheler’s phenomenological approach. thus, this paper is not an analysis of the historical relation between scheler and heidegger. rather, this paper works out value’s givenness itself in relation by considering two phenomenological frameworks together. hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 2 after working out value’s givenness and seeing which phenomenology can best accommodate value, i will show the applicable upshot of scheler’s thought to an applied problem. i will show that disagreements over the management and accessibility to health care in the united states invert the absolute value and overwhelming fullness of persons. this example serves to show the theoretical benefit of adopting a hermeneutics of value rooted in scheler’s thought more generally and further evinces the problematic silence plaguing heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology about the prominent role values play in our experience at a fundamental and ontological level. introduction to the problem scheler offered tiny clues in the formalismus as to what he thought phenomenology could do for him. these insights were given in the introduction between the central preoccupations of method. for heidegger, phenomenology was the way into working out the problem of being in his fundamental ontology in being and time, yet the problem presented itself when heidegger construed phenomenology as a hermeneutic turn. while scheler was not necessarily preoccupied with method in the same way heidegger responded to husserl, scheler can still be analyzed in terms of what he claimed about phenomenology in the formalismus. primarily, scheler was interested in developing his personalism against the background of kant’s moral philosophy. we must look passed the formalismus. heidegger was preoccupied with method, but heidegger’s “method” comes across indirectly as a consequence of interrogating dasein about the question of the meaning of being and the history of ontology. in what follows, i want to ask the questions: what is the givenness of value? how is value experienced in its givenness? if i can answer these questions, then it is the phenomenological criterion of value itself that can answer which phenomenological framework better suits value’s givenness. i will first discuss scheler and then move to heidegger. i. scheler’s intuition of essences scheler’s conception of phenomenology is given in chapter 2 of the formalismus. in the formalismus, he outlined his concepts of the a priori and phenomenological intuition, or what he called “essential intuiting” (wesensschau). scheler designated “as ‘a priori’ all those ideal units of meaning and those propositions that are self-given by way of an immediate intuitive content in the absence of any kind of positing” (scheler, 1973a, p. 48). like husserl, phenomenology is opposed to the natural attitude and is therefore a special type of experience (frings, 1996, p. 18). in the natural attitude, we regard phenomena as a natural fact described by the sciences, and in this standpoint, phenomena are described from a third-person perspective. the natural attitude seeks only to describe from an objective or impartial perspective. it does not pay attention to how phenomena are disclosed to us in the first-person perspective, and the natural attitude takes for granted the senseconstituting role of subjectivity in experience. the natural attitude reveals phenomena in their non-experienced features and has, therefore, a skewed interpretation. phenomenological description is the attempt to render experiential elements clear that undergird and constitute experience itself as we truly live through them by remaining true to both the subjectivity of the experiencer and the enjoined constituted object. if i told my wife that love is merely the evolutionary adaptive strategy to facilitate human pair-bonding and that we need not concern ourselves with the actual content of love (as it is lived), i would seriously disregard what it means to be in love in the first place. moreover, the thirdhackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 3 person perspective does not and cannot address what it is like to be in love. 1 thus, scheler opposed the propensity of the natural attitude to posit and take for granted the origins of how acts constitute the meaning of phenomena. instead, meaning-constitution of an act can only be apprehended in absolute immanence and we must pay specific attention to what is given in experience. what is given in experience is how a phenomenon is lived through within experience. for scheler, attempting a description is more line with an attitudinal approach than a well-established method. this also marks a considerable difference between him and husserl. …phenomenology is neither the name of a new science nor a substitute for the word philosophy; it is the name of an attitude of spiritual seeing in which one can see or experience something which otherwise remains hidden, namely, a realm of facts of a particular kind. i say attitude, not method. a method is a goal-directed procedure for thinking about facts…before they have been fixed by logic, and second, of a procedure of seeing… that which is seen and experienced is given only in the seeing and experiencing of the act itself, in its being acted out; it appears in that act and only in it. (scheler, 1973b, pp. 137138) for scheler, phenomenological description is about describing the sphere of acts in which we experience the world. as products of “spiritual seeing,” these descriptions aim at the primordial acts prior to all other cognition and experience. in such a way, the phenomenologist attempts to retrieve the “most intensely vital and most immediate contact with the world itself, that is with those things in the world with which it is concerned and these things as they are immediately given to experience” (scheler, 1973b, p. 138). experience, according to scheler, means the immediately given nature of phenomena and these phenomena “are ‘in themselves there’ only in this act (scheler, 1973b, p. 138). it is only within the sphere of acts in which we have a living contact with the world, and it is only as a unity of these acts we experience each other as persons. for scheler, the immediate apprehension of whatness/essence cannot be disclosed by scientific thinking at all. instead, the content of that immediate apprehension is what enables our efforts to understand science. essences reveal the intelligibility and meaning of the world given in experience. then, science is an abstraction of phenomenological experience. in scheler’s terms, “we can also say that essences and their interconnections are a priori “given” “prior” to all experience” (scheler, 1973a, p. 49). scheler equated phenomenological intuition with phenomenological experience (scheler, 1973a, p. 48). in phenomenology, this connection between act-center and the world is collapsed in how experience is undergone, and this is called “intentionality.” the act-center is consciousness of something. anytime i am fearful, i am fearful of the spider. when i perceive, i am perceiving the tree. there is no moment in which consciousness is not taking an object. thus, we are constantly undergoing moments of intentional relation with the world, and it is phenomenology that attempts to retrieve how it is that experience is undergone by careful attention to what we intuit as given within this intentional structure. scheler’s term for intentionality that emphasizes the constant unfolding linkage of acts and the world is interconnection. an essence is not mysterious for the phenomenologist. instead, essence refers only to ‘what-ness’ of a thing (was-sein). for scheler, it does not refer to a universal or particular concept of a thing. for example, if i have a hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 4 blue thing in front of me, the essence “blue” is given in the universal concept of the thing as well as the particular experience of the thing in question. therefore, the essence is the whatness that carries over into both the universal and particular conception of a thing. in this way, the phenomenological essence is neither a particular thing, or a universal abstraction or ideality. instead, the phenomenological essence is the mode of givenness exhibited within experience and these modes of givenness constitute experience of the phenomenon as such. therefore, it is wrong to say that the phenomenological content can be reified to support any particular ontology, and this is the reason why philip blosser articulated the weakness of scheler’s thought and relationship it has acquired in relation to heidegger’s fundamental ontology. on this, blosser wrote …the chief defect of scheler’s phenomenology, like all philosophies of value, was the weakness of his treatment of the ontology of values. the insufficient development of this fundamental aspect of value theory has left it especially vulnerable in a philosophical climate that has been distinguished, since the 1930s, by the major “growth industry” of heideggerian ontology, making this appear probably the most critical defect of scheler’s formalismus. (blosser, 1995, p. 16) blosser is not alone in his assessment. in addition, stephen schneck claimed “(i)n accepting phenomenology, scheler was already steeped in the life philosophies and was committed to an unrefined metaphysical position to an as yet undefined metaphysical position” (schneck, 1987, p. 31). scheler’s sense of ontology remained tenuous and was not fully developed in the formalismus in a complete sense. support for this interpretation can also be seen in what little scheler wrote about essences. essences fill out both sides of the interconnection in terms of acts and propositions. let me describe the latter. scheler wrote whenever we have such essences and such interconnections among them, the truth of propositions that find their fulfillment in such essences is totally independent of the entire sphere of observation and description, as well as of what is established in inductive experience. this truth is also independent, quite obviously of all that enters into causal explanation. it can neither be verified nor refuted by this kind of “experience.” (scheler, 1973a, p. 49) in other words, essences locate the interconnections between what is given originally prior to experience to such an extent that this originally prior sense is independent of the empirical determinations about experience. however, he did not develop what it means for phenomenology to be independent. the term “independent” follows from scheler’s description of “immanent experience.” by immanent, he meant “only what is intuitively in an act of experiencing” and by contrast, “non-phenomenological experience is in principle an experience through or by means of symbols and, hence mediated experience that never gives things “themselves” (scheler, 1973a, p. 51). thus, phenomenological descriptions are independent from mediation of any symbols, or representations. in other words, they are not conditioned in any way, and immanence can only be disclosed to acts of experience, the being-in-an-act of experience. while scheler may not have developed how phenomenological descriptions are independent from the empirical sciences, scheler did develop what he meant by phenomenological independence in other works. in his lehre hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 5 von den drei tatsachen, scheler described three levels of “pure facts.” first, the pure fact must identify a positive something (etwas) as the sensory function through which this intuitive identity is established will be varied. second, pure facts must serve as an ultimate foundation of the intuitive identified essence despite the changing nature of sensory content in which they are first experienced. finally, the pure facts must be independent from the symbolic order in two ways. first, they must be independent from “the symbols with which it is possible for us to designate them” and second, they must be independent from “the symbols which are used in presenting the facts of which they are parts” (scheler, 1973c, p. 299ff). if they are independent, then the connection between act and object must be independent as well, and this will allow the phenomenological descriptions to represent “what is not given in person” to others when sharing phenomenological results with others. phenomenological facts are disclosed in acts but without any mediation. in this way, scheler described the essential interconnections that are possible to address phenomenologically. (1) the essences (and their interconnections) of the qualities and other thingcontents (sachgehalte) given in acts (things-phenomenology) (sächphanomenologie); (2) the essences of acts themselves and their relations of foundation (phenomenology of acts or foundational orders); (3) their interconnections between the essence of acts and those of things [zwischen aktund sachwesenheiten] (e.g. values are given in feeling, colors in seeing, sounds in hearing etc.) (scheler, 1973a, pp. 71-72) scheler’s ontological commitments are inadequately developed, and this makes them unclear. did scheler want to secure an ontological underpinning for his personalism from the brief treatment he gave it in the formalismus? a passage in the phenomenology and the theory of cognition provides support to such a reading linking his phenomenological efforts to future efforts of ontology. “essential connections and essences have an ontological meeting from the start…the ontology of the spirit and world precedes any theory of cognition” (scheler, 1973b, p. 158). here, scheler emphasized the independence of phenomenological description from the causal sciences, in particular various epistemic theories of cognition, must first presuppose the phenomenological priority of how spirit and world are first encountered in conscious acts. those very same acts are accessed through the essential intuiting of the phenomenological attitude to render it clear how being-in-an-act relates to the world. in concluding this section, i explained some of the problematic features that accompany scheler’s thought about experience and how phenomena are given. i find scheler’s formalismus wanting because by itself the language of phenomenology cannot get us very far when it concerns the ontology of value unless phenomenology becomes ontology. clearly, heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology provides an example of how phenomenology breaks into ontology, and it is where i turn to next. ii. heidegger’s hermeneutical phenomenology heidegger operated with a more skeptical, but equally complex conception of phenomenology. for scheler, phenomenology accesses the foundations of meaning in personal acts that later become concealed and taken for granted in the empirical sciences, or what he called “mediated” through signs and symbols. heidegger denied that a conception of phenomenological experience can access immehackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 6 diately pure phenomena. for him, the hermeneutic conception of phenomenology that arose in being and time conceives of the possibility of givenness as that which is always mediated, but brought into the clear. this difference will become apparent as i explain it from section 31 and section 32. moreover, such focused attention on these two sections will illuminate methodological commitments heidegger’s thought never abandoned. in what follows, i pay special attention to how this conception of phenomenology arises within the project of fundamental ontology and being and time as a whole. an entire work could trace out the consequences of hermeneutic phenomenology. such an effort is certainly beyond the task of this work, but it is important also to keep in mind the methodological differences between scheler and heidegger before any exposition of scheler’s concepts and subsequent remedy can be introduced to the problem of dearth of value in heidegger’s fundamental ontology. a central feature of heidegger’s fundamental ontology qua phenomenology involves the analysis of human beings not as epistemic agents, but as “dasein.” dasein is being-in-the-world (sein-in-der-welt) and his name for “us.” heidegger sought a solution to the meaning of being in the very being that can pose the question before itself. it is therefore within dasein (what heidegger used as a phenomenological term to stand for any being that can pose the question of its own existence to itself) that this concern arises. dasein is described as being-in-the-world. by understanding dasein as being-in-the-world, heidegger explicated the question of being in terms of the practical orientation we exhibit towards the world and others. at the same time, being-in-the-world is a collapse between dasein and world. we come to understand ourselves only in light of the everyday contexts we find ourselves already in. we do not know a hammer from the detached perspective as just another epistemic object. rather, we know the hammer from the contextual significance it possesses in a nexus of instrumental relationships in which it is used. thus, phenomenology attempts to bring to light that which is concealed over or taken for granted. phenomenological description brings into explicit relief the hidden contexts and purposes that underscore practical interaction with the world. this point can only further be clarified if we explain understanding. under a hermeneutic conception, dasein is centrally characterized as understanding, but as i have already emphasized this conception of understanding does not mean understanding only as knowledge. understanding is not primarily a formal conception of knowledge that epistemologists analyze and consider primitively basic to human experience. rather, understanding is the implicit intelligibility that characterizes human activities as meaningful and already familiar in practice. when we understand objects, we understand them as neither objects with external properties, nor an explanation that attempts to stand over a phenomenon in a transhistorical sense either (heidegger, 1962, p. 182/143). instead, understanding is a primordial disclosure of possibilities of the world as a whole or the possibilities that pertain to my self-understanding as a historically mediated being thrown into the world. ontically, we often claim “to understand something” but for heidegger we have to be clear. the ontic interpretations are those concealed over in the public cliché attitudes and natural attitude in husserl and scheler. ontic explanations are unexamined and offer no primordial investigation of a fundamental ontology that hermeneutic phenomenology can. heidegger offered a fundamental ontology through a hermeneutic phenomenology. he hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 7 described the ontological facticity of dasein as the structure of care (sorge). in the structure of care heidegger described understanding as an existentiale an ontologically constitutive characteristic of dasein at precognitive the layer of experience. through the existentiales, one experiences the world. accordingly, understanding is not a competence, but being as existing, or what we might call a being-possible. it is a way of existing. a candidate passage might help clarify: in understanding, as an existentiale, that which we have such competence over is not a “what”, but being as existing. the kind of being which dasein has, as potentiality-for-being, lies existentially in understanding. dasein is not something present-at-hand which possesses its competence for something by way of an extra; it is primarily being-possible. (heidegger, 1962, p. 183/143) as seen above, dasein is its “possibilities,” and those possibilities pertain not only to itself but how it understands being as existing, as it already is thrown into the world. these possibilities are never independent of the world in the way we described in scheler. in other words, heidegger does not think that possibilities are “free-floating potentiality-forbeing in the sense of the liberty of indifference” (heidegger, 1962, p. 183/144). in this way, possibilities are not like the “propositionalized” maxims of kantian moral philosophy that have their source in something else other than being-in-the-world. instead, dasein is ontologically understood as its possibilities. however, possibilities come already furnished in a world not of our own making. heidegger wrote as the potentiality-for-being which is is, it has let such possibilities pass by; it is constantly waiving the possibilities of its being, or else it seizes upon them and makes mistakes. but this means that dasein is being-possible which has been delivered over to itself thrown possibility through and through. dasein is the possibility of being-free for its ownmost potentialityfor-being. its being-possible is transparent to itself in different possible ways and degrees. (heidegger, 1962, p. 183/144) in other words, dasein is an undetermined potentiality full of possibilities it may choose for itself. sometimes, it will make mistakes in that choosing, but it seizes upon those possibilities nonetheless. accordingly, dasein must be handed over to itself as a field of potential possibilities it may choose, and the formation of these possibilities is not completely within human control. there is a world already underway we are born into. we are thrown into the world. there are legacies shaping the direction and field of history i must and cannot help but respond to in my vocation. when i teach philosophy, i have come to expect that students from poorer areas have less developed writing skills on average than those that come from more affluent areas. while this is not always the case, a part of this problem places undue burdens on me as a teacher of philosophy in a public american university. i have to work harder at getting clear what a text says to my students due in large measure by their lack of preparation for university life. i have to develop cultural references that might be analogous to the life of students far removed from philosophical texts. these legacies of under-preparation, failing high schools, and open admissions subsist even if i had never chosen to be a philosopher teaching at a public university. in another sense, however, these possibilities are mine and mine alone. i am the one who was assigned such and such a course with enrolling first-year students. all of these factors shape my situation. as heidegger insisted, it is a matter of “degree.” hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 8 dasein is thrown, and thus understanding takes into account the whole of a situation, and has a basic idea of its capabilities already but possession of this self-knowledge is not guaranteed. dasein can fail to recognize that it is essentially its ownmost possibility. understanding can go astray. heidegger summarized his complete definition of understanding: “understanding is the existential being of dasein’s own potentiality-for-being; and it is so in such a way that this being discloses in itself what its being is capable of” (heidegger, 1962, p. 184/144). to unpack this conception, dasein is that which has its own being as it issue for it. we are in possession of our own possibility. this possession is not mysterious, but it is a structure exhibited in our everyday daily experience. in this way, the possibilities are concrete. in an intimate way, we know what we are capable of since an intimate familiarity with our own being is disclosed in a very practical orientation towards the world. let me take stock of what has been established thus far. for heidegger, possibilities were not a deliberated choice, or a detached belief that will inform action later on. these possibilities are concretized in a particular context of significance. these possibilities are already present in a world we are thrown into, and the possession of these possibilities occur in matters of degree. these possibilities are always relative to a worldly situation. understanding is always practically-oriented in a context this is what heidegger meant by calling the projected understanding a “for-thesake-of-which” (heidegger, 1962, p. 182/143). by being constantly affixed to the worldly concrete possibilities and situational character, heidegger introduced a distinction between factuality and facticity. let me explain the distinction. many past thinkers have argued what is possible by connecting those inferences about possibility to what someone is “factually.” for example, aristotle’s doctrine of natural slavery in the politics largely depends on metaphysical assumptions. (aristotle, 1254a, pp. 28-32) for aristotle, a thing possesses its nature inherent within it, and as such, the distinction between those that rule and those that are ruled inheres in the nature of individuals. in another way, the pseudoscience of phrenology in the 19th century “secured” the truth of racist attitudes. in addition, understanding “agency” in moral philosophy has gravitated towards attempting to construct moral theories by first examining how humans operate socially through social psychology.2 this is an attempt at establishing what we are factually rather than looking at how it is we exist as being-in-the-world. the latter emphasizes the facticity of human life over what aristotle, pseudoscience or the use of moral psychology can do for us in ethics. the point in raising these examples is to open up dasein’s worldly structure but at the same time being aware of what heidegger is not claiming. dasein could never be discerned from what it is factually. instead, “dasein is ‘more’ than it factually is, supposing that one might want to make an inventory of it as something-at-hand and list the contents of its being… ” (heidegger, 1962, p. 185/145). therefore, again, dasein cannot be known by simply listing off the properties of its being as a scientific perspective might insist. instead, heidegger’s analysis is an existential-ontological account of how the projection of self-understanding can become “what it is by becoming what is possible for it to be” (hoy, 1993, p. 181). in order to understand what one may become, interpretation is required since we must be able to interpret the already possessed conception of who we want to become. for my purposes here, the possibilities can thus be interpreted as “modes of givenness” and interpretation imposes the limit of how those modes of givenness can be understood. hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 9 by interpretation (auslegung), heidegger meant a practically-oriented capacity of understanding to bring into view the parts and wholes of an entire possibility and context. put another way, interpretation is the development of the understanding’s projection upon what is inherently possible. in heidegger’s words, an interpretation is “the working out of possibilities projected in understanding” (heidegger, 1962, p. 189/148). thus, we must already have a worked out understanding of possibilities prior to interpretation since interpretation is grounded in the understanding. understanding is never generated out of interpretation. instead, understanding is the prereflective, pre-linguistic, and pre-cognitive practical orientation that makes it possible to interpret the world at all. we understand aspects of the world already; we understand something-as-something. when i engage in reading a book, i understand the book as something to be read. the book occurs in the in-order-to relationships that constitute the whole world and the possible interpretations of it: that which is disclosed in understanding that which is understood is already accessible i such a way that its ‘as which’ can be made to stand out explicitly. the ‘as’ makes up the structure of explicitness of something that is understood. it constitutes the interpretation. (heidegger, 1962, p. 189/149) in other words, there is an implicit background to the world, a nexus of practical relationships behind understanding and interpreting the world that heidegger called the “totality of involvements.” i possess an intimate familiarity with many of these practical relationships already. for heidegger, we are born into a world already underway within its own historicity and, likewise, all interpretations are a working out of projective understanding in that historicity and totality of involvements. the totality of involvements is always understood not as a grasping of facts independently of that historicity and already understood contexts of significance. instead, the totality of involvements is what heidegger called “ready-to-hand” (zuhanden). we do not apprehend properties about objects outside of the interpretively-laden contexts we inhabit. such an apprehension would exemplify what heidegger called “present-at-hand” (vorhanden). moreover, this holds for value too. as heidegger put it, “in interpreting we do not throw a signification over some naked thing which is present-at-hand, we do not stick a value on it…” (heidegger, 1962, p. 190/150). in other words, interpretations cannot get outside of the contextual significance. instead, this hermeneutic threshold holds for value. for instance, values are not disclosed as a mind-independent property through a type of moral intuition.3 in the totality of involvements, there are three pre-linguistic/precognitive features that condition interpretation and further the hermeneutic threshold already described. as heidegger put it, “an interpretation is never a presuppositionless apprehending” (heidegger, 1962, p. 191/150). first, there is fore-having (vorhabe). we have a prior understanding that does not stand out clearly from the background. we understand the bridge is something to cross prior the practical involvement of driving. secondly, there is fore-sight (vorsicht). this is the act of appropriation in which the interpreter brings into relief an already understood but veiled aspect of a thing, and this is what is responsible for conceptualization of a thing for interpretation. finally, heidegger described fore-conception (vorgriff). this is the already decided and definite way of conceiving the thing to be interpreted “either with finality or with reservations; it is grounded in something we grasp in advance—in a foreconception” (heidegger, 1962, p. 191/150). hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 10 all three factors describe the fore-structure. these three features constitute the hermeneutic threshold that interpretation imposes upon what is possible for us. hermeneutic phenomenology is not simply a description about the limits of understanding and interpretations. those are certainly part of it, yet it is more. for me, hermeneutic phenomenology is the fusion of the asstructure and fore-structure in heidegger. the fore-structure is the particular way in which the whole “must already have understood what is to be interpreted” (heidegger, 1962, p. 194/152). hermeneutic phenomenology is the descriptive attempt to bring the as-structures and fore-structures together in which together they form an articulation.4 the as-structure is the thing “as its own” but such a thing is given as part of a contextual whole. their togetherness delimits how projective understanding actually works. in projective understanding, …entities are disclosed in their possibility. the character of the possibility corresponds, on each occasion, with the kind of the entity which is understood. entities within-the-world generally are projected upon the world—that is, upon the whole of significance, to whose referencerelations concern, as being-in-the-world, has been tied up in advance. (heidegger, 1962, p. 192/151) in other words, projective understanding is limited by the part-whole relation disclosed in the as-structure and fore-structure. to say that understanding works out possibilities for interpretation within the partwhole relationship is not to commit oneself to circular reasoning. it is not a “vicious circle” as heidegger insisted. instead, interpretation is an effort to see more than simply an ideal of knowledge operating as pure philosophizing but rather “a positive possibility of the most primordial kind of knowing” (heidegger, 1962, p. 195/153). heidegger’s phenomenological description of understanding limits the very possibility of phenomenological ontology itself. more generally, many philosophers have imposed the standards of deductive rigor upon discourses in philosophy. these rigorous discourses attempt to get at the truth of a discourse. yet, such an imposition of an ideal of knowledge is still a species of projective understanding. in the crisis of the european sciences, husserl phenomenologically retrieved how the sedimentation of historical meaning in galileo had “mathematized” nature to the point that nature itself could only be understood scientifically as an event within space-time.5 such events could not be given any other way. quite similarly, heidegger’s insistence on the priority of practical engagement with the world is a similar insight. heidegger’s efforts return to what is given, and at the same time, the return establishes a limit that neither understanding nor interpretation can surpass. this would include how values could be given, if at all. iii. phenomenological tensions the differences in these respective philosophies illustrate two ways values can be interpreted. first, scheler’s silence on the ontology of value follows from his phenomenological attitude. from the earlier passage, scheler regarded the “given only in the seeing and experiencing of the act itself.” in the sphere of acts, we could discern the essences of things, but this essential insight cannot glean any ontological insight. scheler was a thoroughly committed pure phenomenologist at that point, and the ontological neutrality of the attitude of “spiritual seeing” does not seek to delimit that which can be given. scheler’s insistence on the immediate givenness of value through emotional intuition expresses that spirit may discern the what-ness of a phenomenon, yet we are never told anything about what eshackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 11 sences are anymore than how it is that values are given as an eternal a priori order of ranks. on the other hand, dasein cannot immediate intuitively apprehend a phenomenon. according to heidegger, all understanding is – to put it in scheler’s words – “mediated” through “signs and symbols.” therefore, it is clear that insofar as the analysis regards the formalismus and being and time, there are clear contradictory commitments to either a phenomenology that can discern essences immediately through intuition or a hermeneutic phenomenology in which the understanding works out its interpretive possibilities mediated through the as-and-fore-structures of experience. if someone is given the choice between these two approaches, the question can be asked: which approach allows for a better understanding of value’s givenness? in the nature of sympathy, scheler argued that existence is pervasively already mooded that is to say, scheler’s insistence that affectivity pervades human life is that such affectivity is being-in-the-world. i offer the following passage as evidence of this interpretation: …the value-qualities of objects are already given in advance at a level where their imaged and conceptual features are not yet vouchsafed to us, and hence that the apprehension of values is the basis of our subsequent apprehension of objects. (scheler, 2008, p. 57-58) we are actively borne into a world engrossed in an emotional tonality. human life is thoroughly “mooded” in scheler. consequently, there is agreement with the heideggerian insistence on dasein as being-in-the-world, and how the care structure unfolds emphasizing “moodedness.” scheler’s analysis takes affectivity farther than being and time. he gives full phenomenological independence to affective intentionality whereas moods are just one existentiale in the care structure. for it is our whole spiritual life and not simply objective thinking in the sense of cognition of being that possesses “pure” acts and laws of acts which are, according to their nature and contents, independent of the human organization. the emotive elements of spirit, such as feeling, preferring, loving, hating and willing, also possess original a priori contents which are not borrowed from “thinking”, and which ethics must show to be independent of logic. there is an a priori ordre du coeur, or logique du coeur as blaise pascal aptly calls it. (scheler, 1973a, p. 63) scheler considered the experience of affectivity as the basis for all other experiences. in heidegger, the moods are experienced in much the same way as scheler. they are a copenetrating part of the structure of care. moods come from behind us, without our control, and we are constantly delivered over to them. every situation is mooded, and therefore given as already mooded as such. in this way, both scheler and heidegger emphasized the same primordial level of affectivity in which all situations and the world itself is disclosed. yet, there is a striking difference between both phenomenological approaches. in scheler, the emotions form an independent autonomous logic disclosed in the structure of intentional acts. in heidegger, the moods work alongside the other existentiales. this autonomous logic is the reason why schelerian phenomenology is capable of grasping the values intended in emotions more fully than heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology, and explains why heidegger could not adequately grasp values in the everydayness of dasein. the givenness of value-qualities in experience, when successfully bracketed phenomenologically, perdure. that is, values are given as a form of intransient permanence as evidenced in acts of love. these acts are of spirit, hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 12 and they disclose values as objectively valid in their own way. consider the experience of love. love is a personal intentional act that opens up the grasp of value’s givenness of another’s spiritual essence. these others could be other persons, an anonymous other – such as other americans, or maybe an idea like justice. either way, the structure of love is the same intentional act and offers us phenomenological insight into the experience of values itself. in love, i will adopt a permanent intransient orientation to sacrifice all my effort to bring the other to proper fruition. i will not attempt to control, manipulate, or dominate this other. control, domination, or manipulation would only attempt to bring about an imposed conception of what the other should be rather than allowing the unique other to be. hence, love is the movement or ascendancy of scheler’s value-rankings that allows the valued good to become more than what it is, and at the highest level is the absolute value of the person. being capable of experiencing value’s givenness requires eliminating any mediation such that the experience can pick upon value’s overwhelming fullness. the overwhelming fullness of value’s givenness is a conceptual feature of value itself. it could be proposed that heidegger picked up on the givenness of value as a form of permanence, but heidegger held value to be an ontic phenomenon that naively regard values as present-at-hand. as heidegger first mentioned ethics in being and time dasein’s ways of behavior, its capacities, powers, possibilities, and vicissitudes, have been studied with varying extent in philosophical psychology, in anthropology, ethics, and ‘political science’, in poetry, biography and in the writing of history each in a different fashion…only when the basic structures of dasein have been adequately worked out with explicit orientation towards the problem of being itself, will what we have hitherto gained in interpreting dasein gets its existential justification. (heidegger, 1962, p. 37/16) for heidegger, ethics is but one example of an ontic interpretation that does not go far enough in elucidating the being of dasein. heidegger thought that various ontic interpretations of dasein’s possibilities had been overlooked and concealed over. in a sense, heidegger was correct, yet had heidegger explored the ground of values as “felt in experience,” he would have gleaned scheler’s insight. i hope the reader understands i am not simply “playing up” scheler, but offering the givenness of value as a reason to regard scheler’s phenomenology more sophisticated on this point. phenomenologically speaking and independent of scheler, values are given as enduring beyond contexts of significance. if i face a similar situation later on in life, then ceteris paribus the same value will apply to the same context of significance. hence, we can understand it when scheler claimed that the determinate order of values “is independent of the form of being into which values enter no matter, for instance, if they are present to us as purely objective qualities, as members of value-complexes (e.g., the beingagreeable or being-beautiful of something), or as values that ‘a thing has’” (scheler, 1973a, p. 17). heidegger had only picked up on the givenness of value partly. indeed, values are given as a presence perduring throughout time because the act-center of persons realizes them into time as goods.6 the act-center of persons in realizing values exceeds representation, and so too do the values realized by persons. an example might prove helpful. scheler stated that values only matter in relation to the dignity of a person, and this is the highest value (which for scheler is the value of the holy). therefore, if i enslave another person, i disregard how he is given to me in experihackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 13 ence as a person. this insight is gleaned in the emotional apprehension i have in relation to a person. the dignity of a person does not come to us through the a priori form of the moral law as a kantian would insist. instead, the inviolable sense of the person is given in her inexhaustible richness as a wholly unique individuated being. the person emanates outward phenomenologically as absolute and unique. it does not matter if we are talking about the slaves of ancient egypt, or slaves in the american south of the 19th century. in all instances, the value of the person is felt in experience. there is no mediation of the value attached to the holy sense afforded to person. in much the same way, levinas insisted on the transhistorical absolute value of the other. it is therefore no mistake that levinas and scheler insisted on the trans-historical and therefore trans-mediated sense that the other person possesses. no ethics can get off the ground if there was not a phenomenological givenness of the person and value itself. in short, ethicists assume the phenomenological existence of values and persons as a basis for their own inquiry. a heideggerian might counter we have simply paid too much attention to the asstructure, the immediate immanence of a person without paying attention to what context or fore-structure that allows us to make such claims as when scheler opens in the second preface to the formalismus with “the spirit behind my ethics is one of rigid ethical absolutism and objectivism” (scheler, 1973a, p. xxiii). consequently, it is no accident that the next sentence follows as “my position may in another respect be called emotional intuitionism” (scheler 1973a, p. xxiii). by contrast, one could agree with gadamer’s sentiments surrounding scheler’s thought. scheler’s major ethics merely “fused the tradition of catholic moral philosophy for the first time with the most advanced positions in modern philosophy” (gadamer, 2008, p. 135). by “modern philosophy,” gadamer referred to phenomenology and its supplementary role to a metaphysics informed by philosophical anthropology. scheler’s contribution is downplayed if a hermeneutic phenomenology in either gadamer or heidegger’s formation succeeds. yet, hermeneutic phenomenology is limited by its inability to capture the absolute immanence of value-experience. there is no mediation in scheler’s thought of value experience. this follows from scheler’s commitment to a phenomenology of essences expressed in the interconnections between emotional acts and value-correlates. interconnections are, like essences, “given”. they are not a “product” of “understanding.” they are original thinginterconnections [sachzusammenhänge], not laws of objects just because they are laws of acts apprehending objects.7 they are “a priori” because they are grounded in essences [wesenheit], not in objects and goods. they are a priori, but not because of “understanding” or “reason” “produces” them. the logos permeating the universe can be grasped only through them. (scheler, 1973a, p. 68) the givenness of value shares in a completely different mode of givenness more than heidegger could anticipate in being and time and this is why it is unfair to insist upon the hermeneutic threshold without fully paying attention to the how-of-givenness and what that how-of-givenness entails for value in particular. the givenness of value could only be articulated in a phenomenology of emotional life where they are experienced directly. for instance, if i find myself likely to eat fish from lake erie, i will refrain. lake erie is very polluted, and the game wardens in pennsylvania near presque isle warn of the dangers. the fish are given as threatening my health. moreover, i come to value my health over the pleasurable desire to eat fish. i choose the vihackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 14 tal value of health over the lower pleasurable value. to experience value is to be thrust in situations in which values are given in relation to each other, and the phenomenological evidence of preferring acts indicates the higher values are chosen at the expense of those experienced as lower. some might be dissatisfied with my interpretation that heidegger missed out on the givenness of value. it is not enough to elicit the motivations for why a philosopher has defended a particular conclusion. herein, i have offered the givenness of value as its own evidence and this is why if a moral phenomenology is to take shape, the phenomenology in question cannot adopt a heideggerian frame. instead, a moral phenomenology can only be founded on a phenomenology open to value in the first place, and unlike heidegger, scheler phenomenology accommodates value’s givenness. however, there are some limitations even to scheler’s approach. scheler provided an account of moral phenomenology that disclosed the how-ofgivenness of values. however, in his ethics, he never provided a clear account as to what the content of values are, nor how that content is experienced. instead, we know what value might be operative in a particular valuecomplex or situation and the phenomenological form of moral experience more generally. i feel a calling of the holy and the values correlated to spiritual feeling but there are no specific duties or prescriptions as to how i instantiate that calling in my actions. with its dearth of a prescriptive element, scheler’s moral phenomenology cannot take the form of a particular moral theory that privileges ways to decide what i ought to do, and by “moral theory,” i mean a philosophical method that provides agents with set procedures for moral deliberation, e.g., kant’s categorical imperative or mill’s greatest happiness principle. at best, scheler might endorse some type of virtue ethics in which phronesis is involved in apprehending what values are salient to a particular value-complex, duty or person, but this is a topic for another time.8 in this paper, i have urged two conclusions regarding the differences spelled out between scheler’s intuition of essences and heidegger’s hermeneutic turn. first, i have argued that the experience of value could not help but be given in terms of its presence-athand nature. persons and values, when viewed within time, resemble presence in the heideggerian sense because of the excess of givenness overtakes the phenomenal appearance and that overwhelming giveness of value is given immanently without mediation. heidegger’s insistence that values are ontic follows from heidegger’s incomplete grasp of how values are given in experience. the intransience of value is simply the manner in which it is given in experience. scheler’s silence about the ontology of value in the formalismus is a product of seeking a phenomenological basis for ethics. put simply, when we engage in phenomenological description, we are not to assume anything prior about the phenomenon, but let the phenomenon show itself from itself. from this phenomenological neutrality, scheler cannot settle anything about the question of values ontologically, but unlike heidegger, scheler’s phenomenology can capture the givenness of value. scheler can say how values are experienced in emotional intuition in preferring, loving, and hating, and that there may be lessons to learn from heidegger. heidegger’s efforts to “ontologize” phenomenological inquiry about factical life is a model for how scheler’s efforts may be better developed though my audience must wait for another time to address the heideggerian suggestions for scheler’s metaphysics yet to come. at present, scheler’s approach is more amiable to the givenness of persons and values and for hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 15 this reason. scheler’s approach should be regarded as the better hermeneutic framework whenever such frameworks concern values in lived-experience. iv. application in this last section, i hope some of my efforts have opened up eidetic seeing about values. the earlier sections provide reasons why we ought to favor scheler’s phenomenology of value over and above heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology. scheler’s unique vision for a phenomenology of value has intellectual merit. his phenomenology of value accommodates the very experience of values. this unique vision is superior to heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology, and the overall ambition of this essay has appealed to the phenomenological evidence of value itself as a way to decide this issue. for nonphenomenologically-inclined thinkers, such a solution may seem rather obtuse. put differently, the interest in hermeneutic approaches to problems of human experience cannot accommodate the experience of values if hermeneutics is restricted to embody heideggerian-inspired approaches. i choose to address heideggerian hermeneutic phenomenology since heidegger’s thought has inspired so many. beyond the concerns with “theory,” let me provide an example why this insight is crucial to those interested in hermeneutic method and application to cultural practices. over the last four years, health care accessibility has been the subject of intense debate in the united states. ever since the passage of the affordable care act (aca hereafter), the politics of the united states have been divided between those that think reform need not involve any alteration of how health care is made accessible in the united states via private companies and those that believe in public insurance. until the aca, a person’s ability to access health care service depended very much on whether one’s job provided health care insurance. in the united states, private companies provide insurance benefits attached to one’s employment. for the underemployed, the jobless and those with preexisting conditions, these people cannot acquire insurance easily or not at all, and the only recourse these at risk populations is to access health care services provided by the emergency room in the hospital. federal law prohibits hospitals from turning away anybody, but this option often puts the uninsured in extreme financial debt if the problem is severe, and hospitals will not go out of their way to serve the uninsured. in january 2014, however, the aca will require all americans to purchase insurance and employers of all types will be required now to offer insurance. this requirement is called the “universal mandate.” let us, now, assume that one wanted to interpret this political situation. in light of feelings of the uninsured prior to the affordable care act, a heideggerian frame could pick up on the anxiety felt of those in the situation. the anxious mood and suffering of one’s health might reveal aspects of our finitude, even possibly revealing aspects of our own being-towards-death depending on the severity of one’s health problem. anxiety can individuate the experiencer and even arrest us from our immersed social self to the point where we achieve an authentic existence (eigenlichkeit). yet, anxiety is not love. anxiety only brings to light my possibilities for action as a finite being and, in its deepest revelation about my own possibilities in the call of conscience. i am not called to serve others as much as i am only aware of myself as anxious. my own freedom and the tenuous resolve to face my situation constitute all i am capable of doing. applied to one’s personal health, this deep revelation of anxiety can only inform me as to how i relate to the environing world. for scheler, anxiety is felt in the vital sphere of values. love allows us to ashackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 16 cend past this value sphere and acquire knowledge of values beyond the personal individuated experience anxiety causes within us. heidegger has no order of preferring within his limited conception of hermeneutic phenomenology to acquire knowledge of values beyond the personal individuated experience of anxiety. love allows us to grasp higher values and realize them in the service of the other. reliant upon scheler’s act of preferring, or what we could call value-ception (wertnehmung), persons can glean the values given in our experience of the world whereas heidegger can only pick up on the moodedness of a situation as it pertains to dasein’s concern only, but not the value-correlates attached to those moods. in this way, heideggerian hermeneutics could not do appropriate justice in understanding the moral imperative necessary to engage in a political dialogue about how best to solve the anxiety of having little or no reliable access to health care services. love is the name of those intentional acts where we ascend in scheler’s value rankings to the highest value of the person. in this way, love enables the growth beyond the vital sphere to solving the problem felt in the vital sphere. we can see this insight in kenneth stikkers’s work on scheler. he wrote contemporary western culture, for example, is to be understood as an utilty-value ethos increasingly dominated by economy what scheler describes the “ethos of industrialism” and to grasp this fact is to gain the single most penetrating insight into that culture. (stikkers, 1986, p. 250) in light of this passage, stikkers continued and showed what the idea of economy looks like as we ascend in value. starting from the lowest value at the top and ascending in love, economic concerns look very different at every level. love is the grasping of higher values over lower ones, and the movement in the various value-spheres, as the example of economic concerns below, would be based on love that would eventually culminate in the holy. thus, economics understood through the various value-spheres in scheler’s thought would resemble the following schema. pleasure: hedonistic consumerism utility: as measured, e.g., by money units vital values: as found in the original life communal meaning of “oikonomia” viz., care of the home spiritual values: e.g., when economies primary interest is justice the holy: e.g., when labor is experienced as participation in god’s ongoing creation and as an act of creation. (stikkers, 1986, p. 251) the aca’s universal mandate that everyone buy public insurance is based on love. if healthier people buy into a nation-wide insurance pool, the cost of uninsured people will no longer drive up costs for those that have insurance, and the universal mandate compels obedience so that more people can afford to purchase it. the aca is motivated by providing access to the economically disenfranchised already tending both towards the spiritual value of justice and the holy. contrary to ascension, conservative advocates mostly favor an entirely free market solution. such solutions privilege the management of one’s home and projection of one’s own self-interest against what would be in the interest of others. the fact that the universal mandate compels people by law to purchase a service they might not want or need is interpreted as going against their own selfinterest. in the vital sphere, we can feel the value of anxiousness, but anxiousness, as i criticize heidegger is self-referential. the violation of liberty often spoken about by opponents of the aca is based on a conception hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 17 of liberty-as-self-interested. yet, the entire system prior to the aca viewed the uninsured as people incapable of paying and excludes them economically. to this day, the health care system seeks to profit from treating patients as consumers rather than the individual person. v. conclusion when it comes to value-experience, there are few approaches in philosophy that can thematize experience. phenomenology is one approach to describing lived-experience.9 yet, the lived-experience of value is unique. values have a special mode of givenness, and as such, the phenomenological commitments of scheler and heidegger prevent or enable that mode of givenness to be seen. in this essay, i argued that if we pay attention to the givenness of value itself as an enduring immanent presence, i can determine which approach can accommodate the givenness of value. as a phenomenologist, i want to allow for the phenomenon of value to shine forth on its own merits, and i devoted considerable attention to see how value could manifest in both approaches. in heidegger’s thought, values are either not gleaned at all or only partially. the principal figure in the development of twentieth century hermeneutics is heidegger. heidegger also eclipses the importance of scheler’s phenomenology, and yet only in scheler’s phenomenology is the core of value-experience truly manifest. for those outside of philosophy but still interested in the application of hermeneutic insight into cultural practices are better served by adopting scheler’s phenomenology when addressing the reality of valueexperience. i attempted to show this insight in the example stikkers applied to economics itself. this application allowed for us to see that despite the prominent appeal of heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology, scheler’s phenomenology of value allows for a deeper insight into cultural practices. references blosser, p. (1995). scheler’s critique of kant’s ethics. athens, oh: ohio university press. frings, m.s. (1996). max scheler: a concise introduction into a great thinker. milwaukee, wi: marquette university press. gadamer, h.g. (2008). philosophical hermeneutics (d. linge, trans.). berkeley, ca: university of california press. heidegger, m. (1962). being and time (j. macquarrie & e. robinson, trans.). new york, ny: harper & row. hoy, d.c. (1993). heidegger and the hermeneutic turn. in c.b. guignon (ed.), the cambridge companion to heidegger (pp. 170-194). cambridge, ma: cambridge university press. scheler, m. (1973a). formalism in ethics and the non-formal ethics of value: a new attempt toward the foundation of an ethical personalism. evanston, il: northwestern university press. scheler, m. (1973b). phenomenology and the theory of cognition in selected philosophical essays (d. lachtermann, trans.) (pp. 136201). evanston, il: northwestern university press. scheler, m. (1973c). the theory of three facts. selected philosophical essays (d. lachterman, trans.) (pp. 202-287)). evanston, il: northwestern university press. scheler, m. (2008). the nature of sympathy (p. heath, trans.). new brunswick, nj: transaction publishers. hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 18 schneck, s. (1987). person and polis: max scheler’s personalism as political theory. albany, ny: state university of new york press. stikkers, k.w. (1986). ‘ethos,’ its relationship to real and ideal sociological factors in scheler’s philosophy of culture. listening: journal of religion and culture, 21(3), 243252. notes 1 the priority of this type of act is central to the entire sphere of moral experience in scheler. 2 the turning point of this in the most recent literature and attraction to social psychology would probably be gilbert harman’s “moral philosophy meets social psychology: virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error” in proceedings of the aristotelian society 99 (1998-1999): pp. 315-333. it is fair to say that this probably goes as far back hume. in his treatise of human nature, hume’s attempt at describing the moral sciences attempts to discern limited to normative theory by appeals to hume’s psychology about sympathetic identification. 3 this holds really for any conception of philosophy that apprehends or discovers mindindependent truths. such examples in some moral philosophy disobey this hermeneutic threshold that heidegger sees as constraining all inquiry. r. schafer-landau is the most recent defense of moral intuitionism in his moral realism: a defense (oxford: oxford university press, 2003). similarly, this hermeneutic limit has consequences for any realism about science, art, ethics or wherever such efforts attempt at grasping the structure itself without seeing such efforts as operative in a context already. these conditions also elicit heidegger’s suspicion about metaphysics and why it is that we must call for the de-structuring of metaphysics. 4 it is no surprise that so much time is spent on logos as a gathering together (legein) and letting-be in heidegger’s essay early greek thinking. 5 it is fair to say that beyond a transcendental idealistic phenomenology, husserl’s draw to sedimentation is an influence of heidegger’s hermeneutic turn. 6 this is a point of contention in parvis emad’s brilliantly argued heidegger and the phenomeology of value (torey press: glen ellyn, il, 1984). in that work, emad thinks the difference between heidegger and scheler turns on scheler’s acceptance of traditional concepts of the person that presuppose a temporality of presence. heidegger, emad insists, works out a completely different account of temporality that questions scheler’s acceptance of a traditional metaphysics concealed in his commitment to intentional acts as products of spirit (and likewise the whole of western metaphysics for that matter). “the atemporal nature of spirit is clearly manifest in its sole representative, the act. the nature of act is such that it does not exist in time. to use scheler’s terminology, acts exercise their influence into time without being extended in it…like the tradition criticized by heidegger, scheler is unaware of the subtle, hidden and elusive role of time” (p. 47) while i do not have the space here to revisit the entire presentation of emad’s argument, emad’s book only takes up the heideggerian confidence in that line without asking first what the givenness of value is itself. the alternative explanation for hackett journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 19 scheler’s lack of awareness about time is simple. values are given in such excess that, like persons, they exhibit a type of givenness that cannot be captured in time. the givenness is a vertical dimension, given in height and only partially understood in the horizon of time articulated in hermeneutic phenomenology. 7 on its own laws apprehending objects would be a form of naïve realism or version of either epistemic or moral intuitionism. 8 while i do not have time to review the literature on this point, i am especially attracted to eugene kelly’s recent efforts to marry virtue ethics, scheler, and hartmann. for more information on this view, see his “between scheler and hartmann: some problems of a material value ethics” in ethics and phenomenology. ed. mark sanders and j. jeremy wisnewski (lanham, maryland: lexington books, 2012): p. 3956. those parties interested in scheler may also read his “on the rehabilitation of virtue” trans. eugene kelly (2005) in american catholic philosophical quarterly, 79(1), 21-37. 9 american pragmatism is the other side of philosophy that regards experience as primary. microsoft word mitchell et al corrected proof.docx corresponding author: gail j. mitchell email: gailm@yorku.ca journal of applied hermeneutics june 12, 2013 the author(s) 2013 dementia discourse: from imposed suffering to knowing other-wise gail j. mitchell, sherry l. dupuis, & pia c. kontos abstract the authors revisit the troubling discourse surrounding the diagnosis of dementia. a critique of the predominant words and images in health care literature, public discourse, and policy is considered from multiple angles. the authors link the dominant words and images with a form of inter-relational violence. contrary images grounded in research and experience offer a different view of what it is like to live with a diagnosis of dementia—a view that is life-affirming and based in relationality and possibility. concepts of embodied selfhood and knowing other-wise are portrayed as doorways to transforming a discourse of violence toward a discourse of compassion and ethical relating. keywords dementia discourse, suffering, embodied selfhood, knowing other-wise in our experience, the diagnosis of dementia, especially alzheimer’s disease (ad), in western society continues to initiate a totalizing process involving suffering, discrimination, isolation, and, in many situations a violence of inter-relating. our purpose in this paper are two-fold. first, we will re-visit the troubling relationship between the dominant medical discourse and consequences for persons with dementia, family care partners, and healthcare workers. second, we will build on the notions of relationality (dupuis et al., 2012a; greenwood, loewenthal, & rose, 2002), embodied selfhood (kontos, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2012; kontos and naglie, 2007a, 2007b, 2009) and knowing other-wise (olthuis, 1997) in order to heighten attention to the ethical responsibilities we all have to persons with dementia. to begin, we show how the discourse surrounding dementia is in large part responsible for reproducing the violent and othering (olthuis, 1997, 2000a, 200b) processes that accompany the label of dementia and disclose how this discourse imposes a suffering of personhood that has yet to be deterred. an alternative discourse of possibility and knowing other-wise (olthuis, 1997, 2000a, mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 2 2000b) is presented as a viable option to shift societal and professional assumptions and prejudices. we concur with several other authors (see for e.g., dupuis, wiersma, & loiselle, 2012b; herskovits, 1995; mintz, 1992; sabat, johnson, swarbrick, & keady, 2011) that the dominant discourse of dementia, coupled with the medicalization of aging, reproduces dementia and human suffering through a totalizing disregard for another’s embodied personhood and the relationships that sustain one’s sense of self-with-other. critical scholars, such as behuniak (2011) who tackled the social construction of persons with dementia as the walking dead or zombies, kontos (2004) who challenges the cognitive foundation of personhood, and dupuis et al. (2011, 2012a, 2012c) consistently dialogues with, and learns from, persons diagnosed with dementia and their families, and remind us of the power of words and how words shape actions in society. language matters and, when used in certain ways, can be dangerous and harmful. language shapes the way we see and frame the world. “what is named [is] noticed; what is not named is unlikely to be seen” (davis, sumara, & luce-kapler, 2008, p. 15). thus, language has a profound impact on how we come to understand things, shaping our assumptions and perceptions. these assumptions influence how we act in different situations and how we are with others (davis et al., 2008; mintz, 1992). the language surrounding dementia has serious implications for how we see and engage with persons diagnosed with some form of dementia, especially azheimer’s disease (dupuis et al., 2011, 2012b; jonas-simpson et al., 2012; mitchell et al., 2011; mitchell, dupuis, & jonas-simpson, 2011; naue & kroll, 2008; sabat et al., 2011). one of the most serious issues relates to how personhood of those diagnosed with dementia is represented. in this paper, we bring forth images and representations from the health and lay literature about what it is like to live with dementia. we review what some outsiders think it is like to live with dementia and consider the dominant discourse that surrounds the dementia diagnosis. serious attempts to counter the dominant discourse are considered as are the experiences of stigma from persons living with dementia. our personal insights and understandings as informed by experience and complexity science are considered before introducing the idea of knowing other-wise and the call for new discourses based in hope and possibility. dementia and personhood what are the images of personhood for those diagnosed with dementia? popular literature and social media portray frightening images of ad. in 2004, a published book titled, death in slow motion: a memoir of a daughter, her mother, and the beast called alzheimer's (cooney) captures the gruesome portrayal of a medical diagnosis. the canadian newspaper, the globe and mail, ran a story called doomed from birth to death (a. mcilroy, may 7, 2007) about a woman born with down’s syndrome, who later developed ad. other titles, such as the living dead: alzheimer’s in america (lushin, 1990) and that cranky old cat may have alzheimer’s (fujita, 2012) layer on the fearful and negative messages about dementia. these images, coupled as they usually are with the tragedy discourse of being doomed, gutted, ravaged, taken over by a beast, and turned into the living dead, perpetuate a deep and pernicious fear of, and disregard for, persons with dementia. legal and medical scholars have contributed to questioning the personhood of those diagnosed with dementia. ponder the mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 3 views of medical philosopher brock (1988) from his consideration of justice and dementia. i believe that the severely demented, while of course remaining members of the human species, approach more closely the conditions of animals than normal adult humans in their psychological capacities. in some respects the severely demented are even worse off than animals such as dogs and horses who have a capacity for integrated and goal directed behavior that the severely demented substantially lack. the dementia that destroys memory…destroys a sense of personal identity across time and hence they lack personhood. (p. 87) twenty years later, an ethicist and advisor to the british government suggested that persons with dementia may have a moral duty to die, especially if they are wasting human and fiscal resources (malpas, 2009). debates continue over issues of personhood, human rights, and the meaning and awareness of self. the assumed loss of self with cognitive impairment can be traced to the 17thcentury rise of the “modern self” where the self and brain became consubstantial, or identical in substance (kontos, 2004; kontos & naglie, 2009). this ideology laid the foundation for the modern view of person as autonomous, rational, and cognitively determined. the equality of brain and self(hood) underpins the predominant biomedical approach of attributing personhood to a body part, the brain, and human actions to be diseasebased behaviours (dupuis et al., 2012b). we deeply appreciate the valued work of health professionals, but the practice of dividing humans and reducing human expressions and experiences to bodily functions and behaviours spread through multiple health care disciplines in their languages, activities, and practice protocols. this spreading, a kind of colonization, also seeps into policies and government regulations in the languages and prescriptive codes used to assess quality and compliance. finally, the seepage penetrates societal and marketing realms in its relentless domination, one that objectifies and problematizes lived experiences such as aging (estes & binney, 1989; kaufman, shim, & russ, 2004) and grieving, to name just two. kemmis and mctaggart (1988) described the interdependent relationships between language/discourse, activities/practice, and social relationships/organisation in the process of institutionalization. the language we use, over time, gradually becomes institutionalized into accepted patterns of discourse, which shape our activities and practices (i.e., how we act) and our social relationships and organization (e.g., how we relate). these interdependent processes are reflected in figure 1. the intermingling and interpenetration of values, words, and actions are undeniable. as olthuis (1997) noted, “knowledges cannot be and never were neutral, dispassionate, disinterested” (p. 2). there is an overabundance of compelling examples about how medical colonization and its discourse has infiltrated human mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 4 life and impacted human lives, especially for persons living with dementia (dupuis et al., 2012b; herskovits, 1995; sabat & harré, 1994; sabat et al., 2011). health professionals contribute to human health and wellbeing in many ways, but the consequences of biomedical colonization perpetuate dehumanized healthcare for persons with dementia evidenced by such practices as infantilization, intimidation, stigmatization, and objectification (herskovits, 1995; kitwood, 1997; mitchell, dupuis, & jonassimpson, 2011; sabat et al., 2011). policy documents and public health forecasters fuel this fear by conjuring up images of the epidemic taking over, the tsunami heading our way, the rising tide of dementia. in marketing with techniques that highlight the most debilitating, demeaning, and despairing fears of alzheimer’s disease and related dementias – the tragedy of it is emphasized and fear is commanded before compassion or even empathy. healthcare journals and texts represent persons diagnosed with dementia as dements, victims, diseased, disoriented, departing, devoid, irrational, disruptive, and uncontrolled. consider these titles: “dementia and the phenomenon of social death” (sweeting & gilhooly, 1997) and “beyond appearances: caring in the land of the living dead” (dunkle, 1995). even authors advocating for revolutionary change in dementia care practices and policies, do not step away from the medical discourse. consider the following description from authors advocating for social justice in dementia care (dilworthanderson, pierre, & hilliard, 2012). alzheimer’s disease is a progressive brain disease that destroys brain cells, causing problems with memory, thinking, and behavior, which affects the ability to work, socialize, and care for oneself. as the disease progresses, alzheimer’s patients increasingly need assistance with basic activities of daily living (adls), such as eating and dressing as well as functions that enable them to live independently, including shopping and managing money (i.e., instrumental activities of daily living [iadls]). in the final stages of the disease, patients require 24hour care. (p. 28) although these authors make an impassioned case for social justice in care and service for persons with dementia, and even though they address stigma and stereotype as forms of social injustice, they do not critique the medical discourse that strongly contributes to the stigma and stereotype of dementia. once diagnosed with dementia, persons and their feelings, actions, and expressions become symptoms within a problematized field of possibility. if persons with dementia express feeling healthy and well, they are judged as being in denial. if they are having trouble remembering details but fill in the gaps to save face, they are said to be confabulating. if they get angry with the way in which health workers are providing care, then they are labeled as aggressive and may end up being restrained and isolated. other scholars have also noted this totalizing process of labeling and problematizing that engulfs a person’s entire life and relationships with others (see for example, dupuis et al., 2011, 2012b, herskovits, 1995; jonassimpson et al., 2012; sabat et al., 2011; whitehouse, 2008). fazio and his colleagues (1999) describe the process of dehumanization in dementia that starts with predominant discourses and labeling and ends with the complete objectification that regards persons as no more than stages of disease and deficit. this dehumanizing process creates suffering by devaluing persons and rupturing relations with the social world; it is a process that mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 5 damages one’s sense of self, leading ultimately to the loss of selfhood that is so widely thought to be caused by neuropathology. alarmingly, the medical colonization has seeped into the social and personal fabrics of contemporary society. the messages are clear and the impact profound. if we all live long enough, the odds are that we too will be diagnosed with dementia. there are strong advocates for diagnosing predementia so that drugs can be started early but this raises ethical concerns and complexities (see leuzy & gauthier, 2012). would we not all have pre-dementia? medications too can be a form of violence—to both the physical body and one’s selfhood and relationships. moynihan and cassels (2008) claim that the drug companies are selling sickness and making a fortune doing it. and, their predominant marketing tool is fear— fear that we too will get dementia, or depression, or some other dysfunction and become like them (herskovits, 1995). but are we not already like them? “do we not all have memory loss?” (basting, 2009). basting helps us see that forgetting is an aspect of being human. we all forget but it is only pathologized with a diagnosis of dementia. if we are the ones contributing to the social construction of alzheimer’s disease, is this not irrational and degrading to humanity? in our experiences, many family care partners also express the othering discourse about their parents or partners. families have expressed to us that they do not believe there is anything left of their loved one no feelings, no relationship, just a desire to get them in a home (see for example, dupuis et al., 2011). this is consistent with a study of more than 100 caregivers for family members in australia. authors reported that less than 50 percent of participants believed life with dementia was worth living and many considered the person socially dead and thought about or wished for the person’s physical death (sweeting & gilhooly, 1997). and the medical colonization of old age and dementia is seen in the everydayness of life for many older persons residing in long term care homes, in our protocols and standards, our assessments, and policies. wiersma and dupuis, as an example, described five socialization processes of mechanical and regulatory procedures -placing the body, defining the body, focusing on the body, managing the body, and relating to the body – used in long-term care homes to create “institutionalized bodies” or what foucault (1977) termed “docile bodies”. colonization is also seen in these settings in the overuse of medication, the use of geri-chairs, side rails and other physical restraints, in the violence of policies and surveillance that leave many direct care providers with moral residue (webster & baylis, 2000), fear, and guilt of knowing that health care should look a lot different than what is being delivered in canada (kontos, miller, mitchell, & cott, 2011; mcgilton, sidani, boscart, guruge, & brown, 2012). long-term care policies do not help. as an example, the ontario long term care act (2007, 2011) is a lengthy document with hundreds of rules and expectations. many relate to the facility, food preparation, plans of care, assessments, and so on. neither the importance of personhood nor the idea of quality relationships are addressed in the act, except for definitions of abuse that attempt to protect residents. however, even then, and we quote: “physical abuse does not include the use of force that is appropriate to the provision of care or assisting a resident with activities of daily living, unless the force used is excessive in the circumstances” (p. 1). it is extremely troubling to realize that the imposed suffering for persons with dementia in our health care system that is mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 6 unnecessary, unethical, and cruel is not addressed. the act focuses on task completion, regulation, compliance, assessment, logarithms, evidence, and enforcement. this reality coupled with narrative accounts from those who provide direct care (see for example, deforge, van wyk, hall, & salmoni, 2011; kontos, et al., 2011) paint a dark, and indeed alarming picture of how far we are from providing compassionate and loving care based in quality relationships. and other authors have raised similar concerns about the absence of relationships in our evidence-based world of healthcare (mitchell, in press; slife & wiggins, 2009). it is our contention that we must shift this violent approach to the care of persons, and especially those with dementia. we must rebel against the suffering we are inflicting on others and the suffering it creates in our own lives (malpas, 2012). other countries, such as denmark, have a totally different approach to dementia care that is far more humanistic and relational. a recent cbc production with leaders in dementia care in a denmark facility reported that instances of problem outbursts were very rare and when they occurred, were considered a failure of relationship, not a disease process (wells, 2012). we would be remiss to not address the complex realities and losses that do accompany the diagnoses of dementia for individual persons and those closest to them. there are deep losses of familiar patterns, routines, ways of relating, and shared remembrances. families often describe feeling trapped and fearful of the realities they see unfolding realities that can increase isolation, loss of friendships, stress, and moments of sheer frustration. but, there is also the reality that the person with dementia is still an embodied being who expresses selfhood and desires, suffering and joy. our concern is that the losses experienced are far more profound when experienced within a totalizing culture that stigmatizes aging and dementia through the tragedy discourse and leads to dehumanizing practices such as objectification, exclusion, silencing and so forth. what would it mean to persons and families experiencing these realities and losses if their communities embraced difference and supported personhood and inclusion? for those of us who are involved in the care of persons with dementia, we have opportunities and obligations to try to make things more humane and compassionate, to work towards the creation of communities in which “all kinds of methods create all kinds of situations in which each of us finds relationships where our gifts are recognized and magnified” (mcknight, 2005, p. 117). countering the dominant view: calls for dignity and relationality some scholars have endeavoured “to restore dignity and resuscitate the humanity of individuals diagnosed with alzheimer’s” (herskovits, 1995, p. 154) by focusing on the subjective experience of dementia, the nature of personhood and the self, and the socio-cultural context of disease definition, rather than on neuro-psychological deficits (see for example, dupuis et al., 2011, 2012a, 2012c; jonas-simpson & mitchell, 2005; kitwood, 1995, 1997; kontos, 2005, 2012; naue & kroll, 2008; sabat et al., 2011; sabat & harré, 1994). the importance of tom kitwood’s (1995, 1997) work cannot be overestimated in terms of the pioneering work he did in the area of personhood and dementia. kitwood began with the assumption that the loss of self commonly associated with dementia was due more to a failure of understanding and care than to a structural failure of the brain. focusing on the social environment of care, kitwood described a host of ways in which persons with demenmitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 7 tia are depersonalized, invalidated, and treated as dysfunctional. our individual and collective efforts have focused on a re-visioning of the self in alzheimer’s disease and we strongly challenge the assumption that the loss of self is a direct consequence of a degenerative process in nervous tissue. like others (see for example, herskovits, 1995; kitwood, 1995, 1997; sabat et al., 2011), we purport that the debasement of personhood is more likely affiliated with the ways persons relate with those diagnosed with dementia. there is little agreement on what the diagnosis of dementia means beyond the neuropathology and there is remarkable diversity in how neuropathology is manifested in individual lives and patterns of living (herskovits, 1995; whitehouse, 2012). further, neurologists now indicate that even persons who have the brain pathology, may not develop the symptoms of dementia (black, 2013). in our re-visioning efforts, we have argued for an expansion of the discourse on selfhood in dementia to include embodied selfexpression (kontos, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2012; kontos & naglie, 2007a, 2007b, 2009), authentic partnerships, (dupuis et al., 2012a), and a focus on the human being and his or her lived experiences and quality of life (jonas-simpson & mitchell, 2005; mitchell, dupuis, & jonas-simpson, 2011). based on empirical research with persons with moderate-severe cognitive impairment, kontos (2004, 2005, 2006, 2012) and kontos and naglie (2007a, 2007b, 2009) illustrate how the engagement of selfhood with the world consists primarily in their essential corporeality of being-in-theworld. the expressiveness of persons with dementia discloses a cultural particularity that is shaped by socialization, but the expressiveness is always embedded in situational unities that call forth bodily movement and gestures. these situational and embodied expressions of self persist despite even severe cognitive impairment. in other words, many life patterns and ways of relating continue to be expressed in the presence of dementia because fundamental aspects of selfhood are embodied and not defined by cognitive function. kontos illustrated how persons with severe dementia continue to express themselves in significant ways through their bodies as demonstrated in social etiquette, affection, friendship overtures, concern for appearance, engagement in religious and artistic practices, expression of physical needs and discomforts, aversion to particular foods, and dispositions that convey one’s prior vocation (kontos, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2012; kontos, miller, & mitchell, 2010; kontos & naglie, 2007a, 2007b, 2009). the importance of the body for these expressions is powerfully illustrated in the following example: a male resident with severe cognitive impairment living on an alzheimer support unit who had lost the ability to talk and feed himself would hit other residents on the head before taking his seat at the table (kontos & naglie, 2007). once a connection was made between the fact that he would always remove his hat before entering the dining room, and that the residents at his table whom he would hit were wearing a hat, it became clear that his ‘aggressive behaviour’ was related to his prior longstanding respect for the etiquette of removing one’s hat before dining. despite severe cognitive impairment, he still retained the ability to express himself through nonverbal behaviour. another example highlights the intersections between social class and gender, showing the ways in which embodied selfhood in dementia continues to express class habitus through habitual manners and gestures, including ones in relation to dress. consider mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 8 the following observation from an alzheimer support unit in a long-term care facility. string of pearls molly’s wheelchair looked enormous next to her thin and shriveled body. her legs had severely atrophied leaving a seemingly two-dimensional form. were she able to stand, she’d be no more than five feet tall. her face was heavily wrinkled but her skin soft, resembling a peach. her hair was uniformly white which accentuated her china-blue eyes. the back of her hands was the most vivid testament to the near century she had lived. the skin was thin revealing a network of bones and purple veins. her hands shook as if powered by an invisible gentle motor. despite her withered appearance there was an indescribable elegance to her. i noticed this in watching molly as she was brought to the dining room. once her wheelchair was positioned at the table a bib was fastened around her neck. molly then carefully unfolded her napkin and placed it on her lap. even though the use of the bib made the need for a napkin redundant, she nonetheless insisted in observing this table etiquette. as a health care aide was feeding her, cereal dribbled from molly’s mouth and coursed down her chin. when the health care aide tried to give her another spoonful molly wrinkled her forehead and gently pushed the woman’s hand away. molly then lifted her bib to her mouth to wipe the cereal. it was only after her chin was clean that she accepted another spoonful. one might expect indifference from a woman who has lost the ability to feed herself and yet molly’s insistence to adhere to a sense of social grace and her attention to neatness, suggested a strong and continuing presence. she closed her eyes slowly and opened them again releasing a deep sigh. she then looked around the table as if for the first time noticing that there were others seated with her. she patiently waited to make eye contact with each of them to acknowledge their presence. then reaching her wavering hand to the back of her neck, she struggled to pull something from underneath her bib. extending her arm appeared to cause her pain and discomfort and yet she persisted. molly eventually revealed a string of pearls she was wearing that had been covered by her bib. she allowed the pearls to pass through her long slender perfectly manicured fingers placing them ever so delicately atop her bib. with this simple gesture, molly emerged from her world of decrepitude, incontinence, dementia and helplessness. (kontos, 2006, pp. 197198) relating with persons with dementia requires recognition and support of the existential expressiveness of the body in its relation to the world, and our unique and shared socio-cultural ways of being-in-the-world (kontos, 2004). it is our experience, in bearing witness to persons with dementia, that a significant amount of suffering is linked with the way the tragic and the horror-filled words and images, that are common place in social and medical literature, get imposed on individuals living with dementia. we reflect our fears on persons and that fear disrupts relationships and opportunities for learning and knowing other-wise. in our work with families living with dementia (dupuis et al., 2012a), one person with dementia described her experience in the following way: mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 9 the person that has the disease are sometimes treated like they’re not here anymore….i think that’s very bad because we definitely are still here. and we might not have all our capabilities up there as we used to have…., we might not have great days all the time but sometimes we do, and i think that should be encouraged and try and make people more aware of what goes on with people with alzheimer’s instead of just saying oh they’ve got alzheimer’s, so i guess they’re not with the program anymore…., a lot of people i know will just walk by me or go the other direction if they see me now because they think i’m not the same person, which i’m not but i’m still here and i can still talk you know. (pp. 428-429). another stated: “many think it is the disease that causes us to withdraw, and to some extent i believe this is true. but, for many of us, we withdraw because we are not provided with meaningful opportunities that allow us to continue to experience joy, purpose, and engagement in life” (dupuis et al., 2012c, p. 240). persons living with dementia tell us about this suffering in their pleas for inclusion, respect, and love: i want others to know and treat us as if we are whole people. we are not half full or half empty. we will never, ever be a shell of ourselves. later in the disease you may knock on my door and i may not answer, but that doesn't mean i'm not home. i am still richard. i am still wholly and fully a human being. i have a right to privacy, dignity, respect, and i am still able i believe perhaps in ways that you cannot appreciate because you don't have dementia. i am still able to appreciate myself, to love, and need to feel love, i am in short no different than you except i have dementia probably of the alzheimer's type. my world is full and complete, it fills my mind, it fills my days, and it's only the professionals and caregivers who remind me of parts of my old world that i cannot access, or i'm confused about. (taylor, 2009, p. 47) malpas (2012) provokes us to think more deeply about suffering and to consider that suffering is “a form of distress that is directly related to one’s sense of personhood” (p.11). our sense of wholeness and of hope is linked with how we and others view and judge our personhood. further, he reminds us that we are all interwoven tapestries that have formed over time and that continue to form through the relationships in now moments. our embodied selfhood is an expression of our relationality with others, with our memories, our hopes, and in the places we find ourselves. malpas says that places are not “containers but openings of actions and movement” (2012, p. 12) places are where compassion dwells where relationships dwell. deeper understandings of living with dementia we have many years of work, practice and research, with persons who live with dementia and their families. over this time, we have learned some things that are not commonly known or acknowledged. first, we have seen that dementia is a very dynamic and fluid phenomenon that is not, as portrayed in the medical and societal discourses, a progressive, irreversible decline of one’s humanity. in our experience, persons with dementia frequently fluctuate moment to moment, day to day, and week to week-among multiple realities interspersed with moments, sometimes shocking moments of mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 10 clarity in the present now. even in the latest stages of dementia, persons have moments or times of clarity that cannot be explained by medical science. secondly, while our work has taught us that persons living with dementia do suffer with all the losses and restrictions that typically accompany the diagnosis of dementia, there are also continuing relationships and love, persisting patterns of one’s values and activities, and moments of humor, joy, and peace. further, there is also new learning and emergent possibilities that happen when living with dementia. the dominant discourse has done a thorough job of portraying the loss and decline, the bitter and the tragic. and, they have relatively ignored the continuity, love, and growth that also exists in life with a diagnosis of dementia. some people and groups have advantage with the dominant discourse as noted previously, political and financial benefits can accompany the tragic portrayals. the third thing we have learned is that people with dementia often live in a world without the boundaries of time, place, and sometimes person. the boundaries that we construct and rely on to separate things like time, place, and person shift with dementia, the boundaries and barriers become more fluid, and less defined such that the person before you, is all at once, in the instant of the now moment; the person before you is a unity of everyone they have been over a life span. past, present and future are experienced together. a woman recalled from one of our practices showed this great expanse of being as she spoke about being a child waiting to sit in her dad’s dentist chair, a mother with growing children, an aging and loving widow, and an old women waiting to be called home. she moved effortlessly in her speech from one scene to the next with no boundaries or limitations of who she was. she was all she had been and all she was becoming there in one instant of being and expanding. this phenomenon of disappearing borders and boundaries may actually herald a different and more transformative process of human aging. there is at least one theory, gerotranscendence (tornstam, 1996, 2005; tornstam & tornqvist, 2000), that suggests some qualities of aging as described by older people in sweden, sound something like the disappearing boundaries with dementia. older persons in sweden also describe a greater connection with the cosmos; connecting and reconnecting with loved ones and memories; and redefinitions of time, space, life, and death. the point we are trying to make is that the process of aging and death is not yet understood; beyond physical changes aging is still a mystery. there is the possibility that the disappearing boundaries of time, place, person currently designated as symptoms of brain disease and dementia, may in fact be markers of a natural transformation that occurs with aging. another theoretical frame offers important insights about the complexity and relationality of human being and the universe. complexity science and relationality complexity science with its core idea of relationality is changing how we think about and relate with persons with dementia. we offer a sketch of how complexity science is helping us to understand dementia and then we turn to several philosophers who have advanced the relational nature of selfhood and the opportunities that many health providers are not yet realizing. we will then explore more fully the notion of the relational self and dementia. complexity science is a conceptual frame that is informing research and practice mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 11 in multiple disciplines, including education, healthcare, physics, and biology (uhl-bien, marian, & mckelvey, 2007; westley, zimmerman, & patton, 2006). there are many sources of complexity thinking that expand understanding of relationality, and possibility in healthcare and education in particular (see for example, davis & sumara, 2012; davis, sumara, & luce-kapler, 2008; doll, 2012; doll, fleener, truit, & st. julien, 2008; mason, 2008; ricca, 2012). “the central ideas of complexity science are that human beings and the universe we inhabit are living systems, complex adaptive systems where mutual process, non-linear change, networked connections, and transformations continually bring forth new realities and new possibilities” (mitchell, jonas-simpson, & cross, 2012). concepts informed by complexity include: emergent growth, mutuality, relationality, non-linearity, and unpredictability (ricca, 2012). complexity science helps us see that there are multiple nested realities emergent over time that co-exist and co-influence through relationships. in figure 2 we offer an image of how nested realities might be conceptualized for persons living with dementia. as portrayed in this figure, a person experiences dementia within a particular family, community, culture, and history. people have relationships with particular memories and dreams, with favourite foods and people, with preferred routines, habits, and life patterns, with familiar and often comforting music and images. the opportunities to engage with persons with dementia have yet to be fully articulated and mobilized into practice arenas. indeed, instead of attending to ways of relating with persons with dementia, in order to preserve and extend their relational selves, regulatory bodies and clinical assessments and protocols are compressing all forms of relating and reducing life in long term care homes to tasks and duties, “bed and body work” (gubrium, 1975), creating “institutional bodies” (wiersma & dupuis, 2010). indeed, recent literature suggests that some direct care providers who care for persons with dementia in long term care are either afraid to care for residents, fearful of doing what people want them to do (deforge et al., 2011) or workers break the rules to do what residents want and live with the fear of being caught and punished (kontos et al., 2010). mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 12 figure 2. dementia & other-wise: an emergent opportunity for wisdom and ethical relating dementia and the relational self we believe that the consequences of the rampant medicalization of later life is a form of violence. the violence is expressed and lived out through image, language, and action in all aspects of our contemporary world. we refer again to figure 2 as a way to think about and see this cone of violence that dominates dementia care in the west, and to also show that there are other alternatives to consider and create. we can attend to relationships in all their complexity and mystery with persons who live with dementia. the question before us is how to move the predominant cone of violence portrayed in the diagram toward the opposing realm of compassion and knowing other-wise? olthuis (1997) proposed that being other-wise is a commitment to being-with and ethics is the responsibility we bear to love another. the question of whether one needs to love to practice knowing other-wise is perhaps debatable. at the very least a core of deep compassion for other human beings is foundational. knowing other-wise is an opportunity to see difference as potential wisdom instead of something to be changed or fixed. if we truly believed that difference is a space of potential growth, an opportunity for engagement and expansion of our own understanding, then how might we approach others? for olthuis (1997), we would approach with a humble curiosity, an open and non-judgmental invitation for the other to reveal who they are in the moment of their own unfolding. one can imagine that such an approach with persons diagnosed with dementia would stand in sharp contrast with contemporary practice protocols and policies. post (2000) conquers: “rather than allowing declining mental capacities to divide humanity into those who are worthy or unworthy of full moral attention, it is better to develop an ethics based on the essential unity of human mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 13 beings and on an assertion of equality despite unlikeness of mind” (p. 5). we wish to build on the ideas of knowing other-wise proposed by olthuis (1997, 2000a, 2000b) and hart (1997), by suggesting that embodied selfhood provides a foundation for an ethics of mutuality. embodied selfhood extends olthuis’ sensory knowing through the articulation of a synthesis of bodily and social being. we are embodied, complex beings who co-evolve with others in the universe. bringing persons with dementia into this space of embodied coevolution deepens and enriches the moral imagination and thereby enables possibility for relationality and compassionate care. although not yet acknowledged as fully participating partners in olthuis’ (1997, 200b) symmetry of mutuality, if difference is the space of emergent wisdom, then persons with dementia create even more potential space and opportunity for developing wisdom and for knowing other-wise. a commitment to knowing other-wise, of embracing dementia as a place of difference and space for learning can provide one pathway toward a more compassionate, wise, and ethical world. the places we live and the relationships that form there either contribute to and respect our personhood, or they deny our personhood and inflict suffering of the deepest kind. and one further point, for staff who work in long term care and who witness the suffering imposed by a culture of care that objectifies and denies the selfhood of others, staff too become depersonalized and distanced in their work. work that should be about nurturing embodied selfhood and relationships, becomes work about bodies and tasks (gubrium, 1975; wiersma & dupuis, 2010). calls for re-thinking complexity and other-wise there are gifted scholars and geriatric specialists who are now questioning the boundaries between normal aging and this process that medicine has labeled a disease. peter whitehouse (2008) is one such scholar and he has published a controversial book called the myth of alzheimer’s disease. some cultures view dementia as a natural part of the life journey (ikels, 1998). the call for action is certainly to ease the pain and unnecessary suffering for persons diagnosed with dementia, or any mental illness for that matter. as a society we need to be more open, more compassionate, more curious about the differences that surround us when persons age or experience different realities. instead of violating others, we could be learning, and growing, and loving others in far more ethical and compassionate ways. transformation of how we care for those living with dementia is needed and must begin with interrogating and changing the language and discourse surrounding dementia. because of the harm and suffering evoked by the current powerful fatalistic and destructive discourses, fazio and his colleagues (1999) emphasised the need for positive alternatives to describe the experience of dementia. they emphasized: “as words change, so do perceptions, and as perceptions change, so do actions” (p. 5). alternative discourses challenge what is known and provide new possibilities for being and relating. as kemmis and mctaggart (1988) noted “to change the culture of our groups (let alone whole institutions or society more broadly), we must change ourselves, with others, through changing the substance, forms and patterns of language, activities and social relationships which characterize groups and interactions among their members” (p. 17). mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 14 cathie borrie (2010a, 2010b), an advocate for both people with alzheimer’s and their care partners, herself cared for her mother with alzheimer’s disease for many years and wrote about how she came to reframe dementia for herself (see borrie, 2010a). she became intrigued with her conversations with her mother and began to tape record their interactions. although in the beginning she saw her mother’s speech as garbled talk, nonsense, she began to see the poetry in her mother’s words. in reframing how she saw her mother’s words, she learned to be truly present with her mother rather than correcting and judging. in thinking differently about her interactions with her mother she learned to listen attentively rather than dismiss. she learned that all actions are imbued with meaning and are a means of communicating. her mother’s words became an unexpected gift and cathie has recently published her mother’s words so that others can see the poetic and celebrate the eccentric realities of dementia (see borrie, 2010b). i felt free, free and undivided, free as a bird! that i done, free and undivided, i feel refreshed. free to flap my arms like a bird. go where i want to go. do what i want to do. we close with an appeal for a more critical stance toward our practices and discourses. the predominant discourse surrounding dementia is entrenching those diagnosed in a cone of violence and fear. we need a more critical examination of our policies and standards and to rebel against those that diminish personhood for others and ourselves. we all need to promote a more curious and open frame of thinking about aging and life with dementia. recent developments in understanding complexity concepts, relationality, and embodied selfhood can inform different ways of thinking, feeling, and acting with persons with dementia. finally, we need to create language that inspires and enables respect, love, creativity, and compassionate relating. we need to fill in the spaces of knowing other-wise with what we come to know when embracing difference with persons with dementia. biographies gail j. mitchell, rn, phd. professor, school of nursing; director/chair york-uhn nursing academy. york university. sherry l. dupuis, phd. director, murray alzheimer research and education program; professor, department of recreation and leisure studies, faculty of applied health sciences, university of waterloo pia c. kontos. phd. research scientist, toronto rehabilitation institute, university health network. associate professor, dalla lana school of public health, university of toronto. references basting, a.d. (2009). forget memory: creating better lives for people with dementia. baltimore, md: johns hopkins university. behuniak, s. m. (2011). the living dead? the construction of people with alzheimer’s disease as zombies. aging & society, 31, 70-92. black, s. (2013). your head and heart more connected than you think. alzheimer’s societycanada. http://www.alzheimer.ca/en/we-canhelp/stories-of-hope/sandra-black mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 15 borrie, c. (2010a). the long hello—the other side of alzheimer’s. vancouver, bc: nightwing. borrie, c. (2010b). looking into your voice – the poetic and eccentric realities of alzheimer’s. vancouver, bc: nightwing. brock, d.w. (1988). justice and the severely demented elderly. the journal of medicine & philosophy, 13(1), 73-99. doi: 10.1093/jmp/13.1.73 cooney, e. (2004). death in slow motion. a memoir of a daughter, her mother, and the beast called alzheimer’s. new york: ny: perenial, an imprint of harpercollins. davis, b., & sumara, d. (2012). fitting teacher education in/to/for an increasingly complex world. complicity: an international journal of complexity and education, 9(1), 30-40. davis, b., sumara, d., & luce-kapler, r. (2008). engaging minds: changing teaching in complex times. (2nd ed.) new york, ny: routledge. deforge, r., van wyk, p. hall, j., & salmoni, a. (2011). afraid to care; unable to care: a critical ethnography within a long term care home. journal of aging studies, 25, 415-426. dilworth-anderson, p., pierre, g., & hilliard, t.s. (2012). social justice, health disparities, and culture in the care of the elderly. the journal of law, medicine, & ethics, 40(1), 26-32, doi: 10.1111/j.1748720x.2012.00642.x doll, w. (2012). complexity and the culture of curriculum. complicity: an international journal of complexity and education, 9(1), 10-29. doll, w., fleener, m. j., trueit, d., & st. julien, j. (eds.) (2005). chaos, complexity, curriculum and culture. new york, ny: peter lang. dunkle, r.m. (1995). byond appearances: caring in the land of the living dead. journal of christian nursing, 12(3), 4-6. dupuis, s., gillies, j., mitchell, g. j., jonassimpson, c., whyte, c., & carson, j. (2011). catapulting shifts in images, understandings and actions for family members through research-based drama. family relations, 60, 104-120. dupuis, s.l., gillies, j., carson, j., whyte, c., genoe, r., loiselle, l., & sadler, l. (2012a). moving beyond patient and client approaches: mobilizing authentic partnerships in dementia care. dementia, 11, 427452. doi: 10.1177/1471301211421063 dupuis, s.l., wiersma, e., & loiselle, l. (2012b). pathologizing behavior: meanings of behaviors in dementia care. journal of aging studies, 26(2), 162–173. dupuis, s.l., whyte, c., carson, j., genoe, r., meschino, l., & sadler, l. (2012c). just dance with me: an authentic partnership approach in understanding leisure in the dementia context. submitted to a special issue on leisure, health and disability of world leisure journal, 54(3), 240-254. estes c.l., & binney e.a. (1989). the biomedicalization of aging: dangers and dilemmas. the gerontologist, 29, 587–597. fazio, s., seman, d., & stansell, d. (1999). rethinking alzheimer’s care. baltimore, md: health professions press. mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 16 foucault, m. (1977). discipline & punish: the birth of the prison. new york, ny: random house. fujita, a. (oct 5, 2012). that cranky old cat may have alzheimer’s. abcnews. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012 /10/that-cranky-old-cat-may-havealzheimers/ gough, n. (2012). complexity, complexity reduction and ‘methodological borrowing’ in educational inquiry. complexity: an international journal of complexity & education, 9(1), 41-56. greenwood, d., loewenthal, d., & rose, t. (2002) a relational approach to providing care for a person suffering from dementia. journal of advanced nursing studies, 36(4), 583-590. gubrium, j.f. (1975). living and dying at murray manor. new york, ny: st. martin’s press. hart, h. (1997). conceptual understanding and knowing other-wise: reflections on rationality and spirituality in philosophy. in j. h. olthuis, (ed.). knowing other-wise. philosophy at the threshold of spirituality (pp. 19-53). new york, ny: fordham university. herskovits, e. (1995). struggling over subjectivity: debates about the “self” and alzheimer’s disease. medical anthropology quarterly, 9(2), 146-164. ikels, c. (1998). the experience of dementia in china. culture, medicine and psychiatry, 22, 257-283. jonas-simpson, c.j., & mitchell, g. j. (2005). giving voice to expressions of quality of life for persons with dementia through story, music, and art. alzheimer’s care quarterly, 6(1), 52-59. jonas-simpson, mitchell, g.j., carson, j., whyte, c., dupuis, s., & gillies, j. (2012). phenomenological shifts for healthcare professionals after experiencing a researchbased drama on living with dementia. journal of advanced nursing, 68, 1944-1955. kaufman, s., shim, j., & russ, a. (2004). revisiting the biomedicalization of aging: clinical trends and ethical challenges. the gerontologist, 44(6), 731-738. kemmis, s., & mctaggart, r. (1988). the action research planner (3rd ed.). geelong: deakin university. kitwood, t. (1995). the new culture of dementia care. london, uk: hawker. kitwood, t. (1997). dementia reconsidered: the person comes first. philadelphia, pa: open university press. kontos, p. (2004) ethnographic reflections on selfhood, embodiment and alzheimer's disease. ageing & society, 24, 829-849. kontos, p. (2005) embodied selfhood in alzheimer's disease: rethinking personcentred care. dementia: the international journal of social research and practice, 4(4), 553-570. kontos, p. (2006) embodied selfhood: an ethnographic exploration of alzheimer's disease. in l. cohen & a. leibing (eds.) thinking about dementia: culture, loss, and the anthropology of senility. new brunswick, n.j: rutgers university. kontos, p.c. (2012) rethinking sociability in long-term care: an embodied dimension of selfhood. dementia: the international mitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 17 journal of social research and practice, 11(3), 329-346. kontos, p. miller, k-l., & mitchell, g. (2010). neglecting the importance of the decision making and care regimes of personal support workers: a critique of standardization of care planning through the rai/mds. the gerontologist, 50(3), 352362. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp165 kontos, p.c., miller, k-l., mitchell, g.j., & cott, c.a. (2011). dementia care at the intersection of regulation and reflexivity: a critical realist perspective. journals of gerontology, 66b, 119-128. kontos, p., & naglie, g. (2007a) bridging theory and practice: imagination, the body, and person-centred dementia care. dementia: the international journal of social research and practice, 6(4), 549-569. kontos, p., & naglie, g. (2007b) expressions of personhood in alzheimer's disease: an evaluation of research-based theatre as a pedagogical tool. qualitative health research, 17(6), 799-811. kontos, p., & naglie, g. (2009) tacit knowledge of caring and embodied selfhood. sociology of health & illness, 31(5), 688704. leuzy, a., & gauthier, s. (2012). ethical issues in alzheimer’s disease: an overview. expert review on neurotherapeutics, 12(5), 557-567. lushin, g. (1990). the living dead: alzheimer’s in america. potomac, md: national foundation for medical research. malpas, p. (2009). do those afflicted with dementia have a moral duty to die? a response to baroness warnock. journal of the new zealand medical association, 122, 1296. http://journal.nzma.org.nz/journal/1221296/3635/ malpas, j. (2012). suffering, compassion, and the possibility of a humane politics. in j. malpas & n. lickiss (eds.), perspectives on human suffering (pp. 9-21). london, uk: springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-27953_2 mason, m. (2008). complexity theory and the philosophy of education. educational philosophy and theory, 40(1), 4–18. mcgilton, k.s., sidani, s., boscart, v.m., guruge, s., & brown, m. (2012). the relationship between care providers relational behaviours and residents mood and behavior in long term care. aging & mental health, 16(4), 507-515. mcilroy, a. (may 7, 2007). doomed from birth to death. globe and mail. mcknight, j. (2005). community and its counterfeits. in b. lucht (ed.), ideas: brilliant thinkers speak their minds (pp. 112128). fredericton, nb, canada: goose lane editions. mintz, d. (1992). what’s in a word: the distancing function of language in medicine. the journal of medical humanities, 13(4), 223–233. mitchell, g.j. (2013). implications of holding ideas of evidence-based practice in nursing. nursing science quarterly, 26(4), 143151. mitchell, g.j., dupuis, s., jonas-simpson, c., whyte, c., carson, j., & gillies, j. (2011). the experience of engaging with research-based drama: evaluation and explimitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 18 cation of synergy and transformation. qualitative inquiry, 17, 379-392. mitchell, g. j., dupuis, s., & jonassimpson, c. (2011). countering stigma with understanding: the role of theatre in social change and transformation. canadian theatre review, 146, 22-27. mitchell, g. jonas-simpson, c., & cross, n. (2012). innovating nursing education: interrelating narrative, conceptual learning, reflection, and complexity science. journal of nursing education and practice, 3(4), 30-39. moynihan, r, & cassels, a. (2008). selling sickness: how the world's biggest pharmaceutical companies are turning us all into patients. vancouver, bc, canada: greystone. naue, u. (2008) ‘self-care without a self’: alzheimer’s disease and the concept of personal responsibility for health. medicine, health care and philosophy, 11, 315–324. naue, u., & kroll, t. (2008). ‘the demented other’: identity and difference in dementia. nursing philosophy, 10, 26–33. olthuis, j. h. (ed.). (1997). knowing otherwise. philosophy at the threshold of spirituality. new york, ny: fordham university. olthuis, j.h. (ed.). (2000a). towards an ethics of community. negotiations of difference in a pluralistic society. waterloo, on, canada: wilfred laurier university. olthuis, j.h. (ed.). (2000b). exclusions and inclusions: dilemmas of difference. in j. h. olthuis (ed.), towards an ethics of community. negotiations of difference in a pluralistic society (pp. 1-10). waterloo, on, canada: wilfred laurier university. post, s.g. (2000). the moral challenge of alzheimer disease (2nd ed.). baltimore, md: the johns hopkins university press. ricca, b. (2012). beyond teaching methods: a complexity approach. complicity: an international journal of complexity and education, 9(2), 31-51. sabat, s.r., & harré, r. (1994). the alzheimer's disease sufferer as a semiotic subject. philosophy, psychiatry, & psychology, 1(3), 145-160. sabat, s.r., johnson, a., swarbrick, c., & keady, j. (2011). the ‘demented other’ or simply ‘a person’? extending the philosophical discourse of naue and kroll through the situated self. nursing philosophy, 12(4), 282-292. slife, b.d., & wiggins, b.j. (2009). taking relationships seriously in psychotherapy: radical relationality. journal of contemporary psychotherapy, 39, 17-24. doi: 10.1007/s10879-008-9100-6 sweeting, h., & gilhooly, m. (1997). dementia and the phenomenon of social death. sociology of health & illness, 19(1), 93-117. taylor, r. (2009, july/august). crossing bridges when you come to them: the biggest mistake? assisted living consult, 5(4), 46-47. tornstam, l. (1996). gerotranscendence a theory about maturing into old age, journal of aging and identity, 1, 37-50. tornstam, l. (2005). gerotranscendence: a developmental theory of positive aging. new york, ny: springer. tornstam, l., & tornqvist, m. (2000). nursing staff's interpretations of "gerotranscenmitchell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 19 dental behavior" in the elderly, journal of aging and identity, 5(1),15-29. uhl-bien, m., marion, r., & mckelvey, b. (2007). complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. the leadership quarterly, 18(4), 298-318. doi 10.1016/j.leaqua. 2007.04.002. webster, g.c., & baylis, f. (2000). moral residue. in s. rubin & l. zoloth (eds.). margin of error: the ethics of mistakes in the practice of medicine (pp. 217-232). hagerstown, md: university publishing. wells, k. (sunday, november 18, 2012). dementia care in denmark. cbc radio. http://www.cbc.ca/player/radio/the+sunda y+edition/id/2304600853/. westley, f., zimmerman, b., & patton, m.q. (2006). getting to maybe. toronto, on, canada: vintage canada. whitehouse, p. (2008). the myth of alzheimer’s: what you aren’t being told about today’s most dreaded diagnosis. new york, ny: st. martin’s griffin. whitehouse, p. (december 10, 2012). war, water, mountains: myths and metaphors of alzheimer’s disease. jackman humanities institute working group on aging, memory, & aesthetics. university of toronto, on, canada. wiersma, e., & dupuis, s. (2010). becoming institutional bodies: socialisation into a long-term care home. journal of aging studies, 25(1), 278-291. microsoft word williamson part 1.docx corresponding author: w. john williamson, phd email: john.williamson@cssd.ab.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 11, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery part one: a strange and earnest client w. john williamson abstract max hunter, a west coast private detective, receives a call from john williamson, a special education teacher / coordinator requesting his help to find the educational category of slow learners. he journeys to calgary and visits williamson in his school. after some discussion max agrees to take the case. max meets an informant with a surprising connection to the case, and finds some key clues, as well as peril, during a visit to the public library. keywords fiction, hermeneutics, mystery, slow learners, psychology, education for jacob i it was a messy case. they can all get messy, but this one got under my skin. i never should have agreed to it that day i got the call. maybe i hadn’t had enough java that day and my sense of danger was still in glorious repose. i was, to be sure, already tired as i squeaked open the door of my office; already tired as i slouched into my desk. i hadn’t had any business in a week, but i was still luxuriating in the rewards from that last case: a bruised jaw, a torn rotator cuff, a fractured love life, and a slight dimming of my already flickering pilot light of hope. i’d been paid out alright in everything but fees, and even as i pondered the toll the last case had taken on me, i knew i would need a paying job soon. the rent for the office was due and the dust bunnies in my care needed to be provided for in the style they’d grown accustomed to. i was torn between brewing a pot of java or treating myself to a drink from the office bottle in the bottom drawer of my desk. i just sat there, staring at the wall, waiting to see which impulse prevailed. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 2 i was watching some ants skittering up the wall like they were racing toward some kind of bounty. it might have been a speck of sugar from that day the week before when i threw my mug of java against it. the one to bring it back to the queen would win a knighthood. above them a spider cruised along her web. they were racing toward her too; they were just too busy to notice. i didn’t have the heart to tell them. the unfolding drama was interrupted by the ringing of my phone. i picked up and was about to announce myself when the voice on the other end beat me to it. “is this mr. max hunter?” i’d considered asking if he was a tax collector or jealous husband but he sounded worried and i didn’t think a crack like that was necessarily appropriate. i answered to the affirmative. “it’s john williamson. i am calling from calgary, alberta, canada. i’m a teacher. i teach special education. actually, i sort of coordinate special education at my school. some of my students, the slow learners, they’ve all disappeared, and it’s not just here, it’s all across the province.” “so call the police. i’ve heard the mounties always get their man.” “i can’t, they don’t handle cases where metaphysics are involved.” i had no idea what he was talking about, but he sounded firm on the point. i switched gears. “why me?” “i was told you were hard-boiled.” he’d done some research. this impressed me, slightly. “can you afford me?” “your usual rates are kind of steep for my department budget, but i need a professional on this case, and i have some money left. you’d have to save every receipt for expenses, and, i’m sorry to say this, pay for your own drinks.” “i’m willing to meet to hear more, but no promises.” at least it would get me out of the office, and away from that bottom drawer. “thank you, mr. hunter. that’s all i ask. i’ll meet you at my school next tuesday, during the first morning tutorial at 7:56 a.m., and make sure you park in visitor, not teacher parking, and make sure to sign the book with your license plate number, make and model of car, and the staff member you are visiting and time of arrival and be sure to collect a visitor badge.” “can someone frisk me too?” i asked, mocking the formality of the proposed liaison, candidly relieved by the prospect of employment despite my insouciant reply. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 3 so the buick and i made our way to calgary. as a west coast hard-boiled detective, i hail from the state of frontier depravity and i can handle the elements.1 still, it was warmer where i came from, and maybe everywhere else too, than it was at this frozen city my potential client had summoned me to. in anticipation of this trip, i’d found the removable extra layer of insulation my trench coat came with and zipped it in, but it wasn’t enough. from the first time i stepped out of the buick, the cold assaulted me with the dull brutality of an overzealous cop beating a suspect with the los angeles yellow pages. dive hotels, on the other hand, are the same everywhere; they smell funny but the hosts don’t ask a lot of questions. after checking in, i let myself into my room with some difficulty. i had been given one of those computerized card keys. i swiped it three times, failing every try. i was just about to kick down the door when i realized i had it upside down, corrected the problem and the door popped open. when i saw the room i wondered why they had bothered with the fancy lock. everything in it, including its present occupant, was cheap, run down, and worthy of neither stealing nor protecting. i sat on the slab they’d made out to be a bed, poured myself a double from the bottle in my suitcase and thought about the case. he’d said they’d all disappeared. “disappeared, like a fist when you open your hand,” i thought.2 i wondered where they’d gone. was foul play involved? after a restless night, the morning imposed itself on me cruelly. during the night i’d dreamt i was at the dinner table, a shrill voice was telling me, “don’t let your meat touch your potatoes; don’t let your potatoes touch your peas …” over and over again. i looked down, fork in hand, and tried to follow the instructions, and make sure my portions were orderly. my plate was filled with hundreds of tiny children dressed in white, brown, and green skittering across the plate with the unsettling speed of fleeing mice. just as i was beginning to recover from this dream and slip into a more peaceful sleep, the four-dollar travel alarm i had brought along woke up and began pecking at my brain. reluctantly rising, i used excessive force to disengage the alarm and i brewed the complimentary two-cup java bag i found in the heavily calcified machine on the other side of the bed. i choked down the rancid results, quickly showered and shaved, and headed off to my appointment. ii it was an older school but reasonably well maintained. graduation pictures hung on the hallway walls. looking at forty years of cohorts, i noted that some hairstyles get reincarnated every twenty years while some run their course and are heard from no more. the hallways were wide. i later learned this was to enable the movement of large pieces of industrial equipment and such things and this feature was typical of all schools built at the time due to extra federal sugar for the industrial arts.3 indeed, the school had several large industrial arts laboratories and i wondered if i might be able to get a cheap haircut and maybe an oil change for the buick, which were two bits of professional maintenance i had been putting off before i left. it seemed weird to see so many students milling about chattering, eating, jostling, talking or texting on their smart 1 hamilton (1987, p. 5) 2 see hammet (1930, p. 61). the simile is borrowed from this source. 3 norman (1984, p. 45) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 4 phones, and to hear a band playing down the hall, while a basketball team practised in the gym at a time of day when i might be barely out of bed, wondering over java if i should bother to shave or not. still, maybe this was typical. williamson met me at the office. i gave my prospective client the once over. he was of average height and build, dressed in beige corduroy pants slightly frayed at the bottom, and brown boat shoes and a blue sweater. if he was meeting the requirements of some kind of a dress code with that outfit it was one i couldn’t comprehend. he smiled as he shook my hand in greeting; it was a sad smile. clumsily, he only connected with a third of my hand so while his grip had adequate pressure it was more like a thumb shake. his eyes, like two dirty blue puddles on cracked white concrete, looked worn out. he awkwardly handed me a business card. he made a hell of a first impression; i thought he’d starve in a sales job. the job title on his card was stupid too – diverse learning coordinating teacher. as i was glancing at the card, williamson observed some students playfully shoving each other in the hallway. he watched for a while, decided to ignore them, and took me downstairs to his room. as we walked, he told me a little about himself. he said he’d been teaching for seventeen years, fifteen of them at his current school. he’d done various things at his school including teaching some regular english language arts courses and acting, as far as i could tell, as a sort of a broker for students who worked with community employers as a part of their high school programs. some of these students just worked at regular jobs, but some did this as a part of accreditation for regulated trades like mechanics or welding. lately, he’d been in charge of coordinating services for students who were seen as having various exceptional or additional needs, and there were quite a few such students at his school. the one common thread in his career, he said, was that ever since he began at his current school he’d been working directly with slow learners as a part of his job assignment. i made a mental note of all of this but didn’t know enough about the case yet to ask any questions. we came to williamson’s room. a title above the door of the room read, rather presumptuously i thought, “the learning centre.” it seemed a larger than average classroom and a lot was going on in there. some students were sitting in desks completing assignments occasionally asking a staff member for help. there were twelve desktop computer stations along the wall. at the desktop stations, students were doing research, on-line courses, word processing, and a few appeared to be discreetly watching music videos or playing games. a rather fidgety student, wearing earphones, sat with her desk pulled up to the corner walls of the room, completing a worksheet by locating answers in a large textbook labeled, simply, foods. a cluster of students sat at a table along the other wall, and were taking turns receiving tutorial help in math from a female staff member who, williamson later told me, had a knack for helping students in this discipline. the room broke into five smaller rooms at the back, an office, and four quiet work spaces for students which williamson told me had once been storage areas before being retasked for their present purpose. in the middle of these, another assistant was reading an english exam out loud to two students. williamson sat me down on the other end of his desk near the back of the main room of the learning centre. he said he liked to work in the main room instead of the small office behind him so he could stay in touch with what was going on in the room. he shoved stacks of paperwork, large folders with students’ names on them, booklets entitled ‘individual program plan’, and other booklets entitled ‘referral for support’ to either side of the large desk, forming a valley through which we better could see at each other as we talked. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 5 “so tell me about the slow learners,” i began. “who exactly are you talking about? and, where do you think they went?” “there really isn’t a clear answer to either question. psychology tells us slow learners are …,” he replied, and then he resorted to making finger quotation marks in the air, “individuals whose i.q.s, you know, their measured intelligence quotients, are one but not two standard deviations below the mean – in the low average range between 75 and 89.” he closed his finger quotations as he elaborated on the data. “two deviations would mean they had intellectual disabilities. they don’t; they are only one deviation below. but they’re supposed to learn slower than ‘average’ students and need extra help.”4 “that sounds like it came out of a textbook,” i observed. “who do you think slow learners are?” “well, i end up reading the files of the kids i work with, and a lot of the kids who struggle do seem to have i.q. scores in that range. but i think it’s more complicated than that....” something was wrong with that. i thought for a second and then it came to me. “what do you mean you work with them? i thought they all disappeared?” “i guess i have to tell you they haven’t exactly physically disappeared like i might have implied on the phone,” he admitted, “in fact, some of them are probably working in this room right now.” suddenly my mind was full of hornets. my hand itched to slap him. clients hold out on me all the time, it’s a convention of the genre, but i’d never had one try to hire me to find something he knew was right in front of him before. through clenched teeth i demanded why he had dragged me out to this frigid city just to waste my time on such a case. before he could answer i thought better of the question, the mysteries of the human heart being what they are, and i muttered something about being on my way home and expecting to be paid well for, as i put it, dropping everything to come up to take on this case. then i got up to begin the long journey back to the bleak predictabilities of my own dark city, the violent streets i travel on, alone and unafraid, the equally complex but more interesting femme fatales, my dingy apartment, my decaying office and, of course, my bottom drawer. williamson stood too. looking stricken, he began to desperately plead for me to stay. “you don’t understand, the slow learners might not have physically disappeared, except for the ones who have dropped out of school, but they have largely disappeared from the talk, or discourse of special education, here and all over the province, and i think that’s pretty important. look, i’m sorry i oversimplified things. please, you’ve come all this way, just hear me out for a little while longer before you decide.” i didn’t have much to lose in staying another minute, i concluded. when i later told the story of this wasted trip, this foolish client, i thought, the more details i could offer, the more i might be likely to hear one of my favorite phrases, ‘on the house,’ from sympathetic bartenders. besides i was curious about something he said. 4 see king (2014) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 6 “so what if nobody talks about them?” i argued. “the kids are here. you try to help them, and it looks like things are going ok in your resource room (i’d heard that term from a previous client and felt a tinge of pride in being able to talk to this specialist in his own lingo). so, what’s the problem?” williamson grimaced and beckoned me to go with him to the private office space behind him. flustered, he tried several keys on his key ring until he found the one that opened the office door. he let us in and shut the door behind us. i considered remarking that it’s always the last key you try but then thought better of it. “careful what you say,” he cautioned earnestly, “these are high school kids; some of them have had bad experiences in resource rooms in junior high and elementary schooling. so, we call this room a learning centre not a resource room. and the kids aren’t forced to come. it’s up to them to come for help, and we don’t just help the so-called ‘special needs kids,’ we help anyone who drops in and….” i cut him off before he could say anything more. he had misled me into making the trip down here and now he was getting pedantic. “whatever, your learning centre. i get it. the kids come; you help them, whatever they’re labeled, no real mystery, end of story.” “no, it isn’t the end of the story. the kids with other exceptionalities like autism, intellectual disabilities, learning disabilities, mental health issues, and attention deficit disorder have special education codes. we have to write individual program plans (ipps) to describe the types of specialized support they will receive, and special funding is attached to them. alberta education releases resource manuals to describe how to best help these kids, school districts hire consultants to help us help them, they receive accommodations on tests, like readers or scribes, to help level the playing field.5 even the most rigid teachers know that it’s expected that they do something more for kids with specific disabilities. slow learners don’t have any of these guarantees.” “should they?” “well, maybe. the kids i work with, the ones who fit the profile, seem to have a pretty rough time with school. extra resources to help a struggling kid are always nice.” “you seem hesitant. what’s the downside?” “labeling practices haven’t necessarily been wholly beneficial in special education.6 i think it’s unlikely that adding one more ‘official’ label would solve very much. i’d like the additional resources, but do we have to call everything that might cause a student to struggle ‘a disability’ 5 see alberta education (2006, pp. 1-3). in their general manual on accommodations alberta education has defined an accommodation as “a change or alteration in the regular way a student is expected to learn, complete assignments or participate in classroom activities.” some assessment accommodations defined in this manual include allowing breaks during a test, reducing the number of questions, breaking a test into parts and administering them at separate times, and / or providing a reader or a scribe. 6 see mehan, hertweck, & meihls (1986) and couture (2012, p. 54) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 7 in order to get the resources? also, how would i know if there aren’t a bunch of other kids out there with the same i.q. levels who are doing just fine in school? i might only end up working with the slow learners who are struggling. the population of students with this cognitive profile might be too diverse for the label to mean much of anything.7 still i think we need something more than what we currently have for these kids.” this was getting worse and worse. he’d misled me into coming, lectured me on terminology and now it seemed like he wasn’t even completely sure he wanted me to solve the case. seeking some kind of satisfactory answer i pressed on. “well, do you want me to find where the idea of a slow learner went or not?” “i do, but after you find it, i want you to help me decide how we should bring it back to the school. what aspects of ‘slow learner’ should be downplayed? what is of worth in the idea? what helps us teach kids?” i brought up something else that was still troubling me. “i still don’t get it. why me? i’m just a wise-cracking shamus. aren’t you worried people won’t think you take this thing seriously if you put me on the case?” “look, maybe i need you because you’re a wise-cracking shamus. seems like a lot of people who work in this field, myself included, can be pretty earnest about things. maybe your approach is a good way of being heard, of pointing out some of the problems without being totally depressing. maybe ‘care’ is a better concept than ‘take serious’. i care deeply about this issue. the opposite of care isn’t humor, it's indifference, inaction….” “i’m not your hired clown. if all you want is to change the tone, you can do that yourself.” “it’s more than that. i need you. i can’t do this on my own. i need your distance from the case. i’m researching in my own backyard here, closer than even that in some ways.” i found this last statement cryptic but allowed my potential client to continue. “i need you to ask questions i wouldn’t be comfortable asking, to go places i can’t go. i’m stuck here all day, but i’m guessing you like to work by moving around a lot.8 you’re going to have to look for this in some weird places, maybe some dark places.” “that’s the first thing you’ve said that makes any sense to me. but there’s something more isn’t there?” williamson looked down. he spoke in a small voice. “it hurts. there are some things about special education that hurt me to talk about. i need your help. i need your strength.” i didn’t know if i should pursue this line of questioning anymore. as a detective i felt i ought to. as a man i was beginning to feel that i’d prodded this guy enough for the day. a student knock 7 claypool, murusiak, & janzen (2008, p. 434) 8 schmid (2008, p. 99) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 8 ing on the door broke my reverie. he wanted williamson to help him track down some answers in a welding textbook. they’d obviously done this sort of thing a lot before. williamson excused himself, said we could talk more in a minute. as he walked back to his desk with the student, all the nervous tension he’d been showing in our conversation seemed to drain out of his body. it seemed that in the moments when was working directly with these kids he was freed, temporarily, from having to worry so much about them. he pulled up a chair and he started helping the student, not doing it for him but giving him some clues. he reminded him to look for key words from the question and gave him hints like telling him the page numbers or even paragraphs where the various answers were hiding, so the student didn’t have to reread the whole chapter looking for every answer. every now and then he would read a section out loud and the student would write down the parts that he thought were the answers. this method didn’t exactly look like rocket science, but it seemed to work. they were both at ease, joking a little even as they worked together. i figured i’d learned all i was going to by watching williamson and the student work together, so as they continued, i grabbed a booklet with his school’s logo off the bookshelf in the back office and skimmed through it. it turned out it was a registration booklet intended to guide students, and the parents and teachers who advised them, in selecting courses. i was surprised to discover that there so many tiers of academic courses offered at each grade level. if i counted advanced placement,9 which according to the booklet was supposed to be an enhanced but not entirely separate curriculum, there were four levels of english language arts available for grade ten students. i assumed the bottom level which was numbered “10-4” was for slow learners. math, science and social studies all appeared to work on the same tiered principle, with a class coded as “10-4” representing the lowest-skilled tier in each discipline.10 having completed his brief session of tutorial help, williamson returned to the back office. “kind of funny he asks me for help on welding theory, williamson noted as he returned to the office. “i’m all thumbs.” i had figured that out from the thumb shake, “i don’t have a clue about welding. but i find the text pretty straightforward.” “it must be sad when kids are that over their heads in a class.” i speculated. i thought i’d said something appropriately sympathetic but williamson didn’t like that very much. “he can handle the class. the welding teacher says he is one of the best welders in there, but he has a hell of a time with the bookwork. this is what he wants to do. we can help him here, but i hope he makes it through the college component of his welding ticket. it would help if he had a formal learning disability they have good disability services in the trades schools. he could have things read out loud to him. but he doesn’t, so i don’t know if he’ll be able to get this kind of help in his technical training. i’ve read his file, according to his i.q., he’s just a slow learner.” “here we go.” i thought. i felt an even worse hard luck tale coming on. 9 calgary board of education (2004, p. 1) 10 alberta education (2014, pp. 1, 6) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 9 “another time i sat with a girl and her parents while the psychologist reviewed the results of psychometric testing,” williamson began, confirming my suspicion. “we had sent in a referral for testing because she was struggling in all her classes. her esl (english as a second language) teacher said she was way behind her peers in learning english, especially when it came to reading and writing, and she was failing almost everything else except for cosmetology and math. well, the psychologist put her i.q. around seventy, but said her adaptive functioning was too high to put her in a special ed. class.11 that made sense too. she was very competent at most of the other things we would expect kids her age to be able to do and she was quite gifted in some things. she had held down a part-time job for more than a year, and often took care of her younger sisters at home. she was doing great on the hands-on assignments in her cosmetology class. she probably spent an hour before school every day on her clothes, hair and make-up. she had a real knack for that sort of thing she always looked so glamorous. anyhow, the psychologist then told us this kid was reading at a grade one level. she said the only way we had any hope of getting her through even the lowest level of classes in the ‘regular education’ tier of instruction would be to do an extensive remedial reading intervention with her, at least an hour a day of one on one work for an entire semester. even after that, she told us we would probably have to continue to have an assistant reading all her tests out loud with her for better understanding and we’d likely have to scribe major writing assignments with her. do you know what our psychologist said the only problem would be with providing these interventions?” i was pretty sure i could guess but the question sounded rhetorical. “she said the district couldn’t officially provide any of these services. we couldn’t be funded for any teacher assistant time to get someone to work with her and no one from the special education team would even be available to come out to help us set up a reading program, because according to the testing she didn’t have a learning disability or an intellectual disability. she was just a slow learner who was very behind in reading.” this was a good story. i was beginning to understand some of williamson’s frustrations, but i still didn’t entirely trust him. some things still didn’t make sense. “wait a minute,” i asserted, “i thought you said nobody uses the term ‘slow learner’ any more. sounds like your psychologist does.” “i’m sorry. sure the psychologist uses it but in terms of funded services offered, special education programs or alberta education’s published best practices for helping these kids, the phrase ‘slow learner’ vanishes into the air. it’s weird so much of the vocabulary of educational psychology is pretty common vocabulary with teachers in schools too, but other than that specialized use i talked about, this one just gets skipped”.12 11 see alberta education (2012, p. 3). the special education class was for students with mild intellectual disabilities. the diagnosis of mild intellectual disability requires both an iq in the 50 to 75 (plus or minus five) range and a demonstration of adaptive behavior, as measured by a standardized inventory, in the delayed range. therefore, as in this case, a student whose iq falls in the intellectual disability range, but who has high adaptive functioning also falls into the ‘slow learner grey zone’. such a student would be predicted to struggle academically, but would be ineligible for many support services. 12 claypool, murusiak, & janzen (2008, pp. 434-435) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 10 williamson was then briefly distracted glancing through the large window of the office to the outer room. he wasn’t needed, though. numbers were thinning out. several of the students were ambling out, and some actually appearing to thank the staff members who had been working with them. “classes start in five minutes,” williamson informed me. “well, i’m sure cases like the one with that girl are pretty rare,” i speculated, resuming the conversation. “actually, i’ve looked it up. according to some, it’s pretty common for a psychologist to be caught in the position of recommending services for a slow learners even while knowing the children won’t qualify because they don’t ‘technically’ have disabilities.”13 i was becoming more interested in spite of myself. i take a sick pleasure from twisted cases, the absurdity of human arrangements, like we’re all very young children dressed up in grown up clothes, inventing a game with no object and then arguing about the rules. this case was starting to sound especially twisted. i still thought he was holding out on me, though. “supposing, just supposing, i do agree to take the case. do you have any idea where i should start looking?” “actually, yes. i think you first need to go back and see if you can find ‘slow learner’ or something like it, some basis for what we now think of as ‘slow learner’ in the past.” “how far back do i need to go?” “you’ll have to rely on your instincts for that, i’m not really sure. i bet some aspects of this label go a long way back.” “where else do i need to look?” “well, even though we don’t hear the term in schools, ‘slow learner’ seems to pop up pretty often in the news stories, in popular fiction, and even in movies. i’d take a look there. see how popular culture constructs the idea.” i liked the sound of that. i had a lot of former clients in hollywood. williamson continued, “then, there’s a series of classes for struggling students. they’re called knowledge and employability, or k & e, classes. before that it was called the integrated occupational program, or iop. they don’t use the words ‘slow learner’ anywhere in the curricula for these courses, but “low average i.q.” is mentioned as a criteria in admittance. the criteria also mentions that students who take k & e are all supposed to be well below grade level in their academic skills and at-risk of not completing a high school diploma.”14 13 ibid. (p. 44) 14 alberta education (2008, p. 41) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 11 i shouldn’t have been surprised by this gem, but i was. i’d almost agreed to the case and then he handed this to me. “hang on,” i interjected, “there’s a program for these kids? a special education program? you keep telling me they’ve disappeared but these kids keep popping up all over the place! i have some advice for you; it’s pretty technical but let’s see if you can grasp it. you don’t look for things that aren’t lost! i’ve been trying to tell you this since i got here. are you a slow learner too, williamson?” all of a sudden i was fixing to leave again, feeling some pleasure about getting this parting shot in. williamson didn’t care for this remark. briefly the mild-mannered teacher’s eyebrows bunched together forming the familiar vertical and horizontal creases between his eyes and his lips tightened. then, after a minute, his mood shifted without improving as his eyes and mouth drooped downward and he sort of hugged himself involuntarily. “look,” he said sadly, “i appreciate that you’ve come a long way and this is an unusual case for you. maybe i’m an annoying client too.” i could have corrected him, he was only a potential client, but i said nothing. “you’ve earned the right to call me anything you want. please, though, just think twice before you casually throw out a label that my kids didn’t choose to have as your favorite insult, like it stands for everything that’s disagreeable.” despite williamson’s unassertive posture, i felt i was being corrected. probably his standard reaction to anyone who indulged in politically incorrect special education talk in his room. i thought he was going a bit overboard. after all, he did seem pretty slow to understand my problems with this case. sure, there might have been a trace of derision in my choice of words, but i thought i was mostly being literal. just then, williamson recovered himself slightly as he smiled a strange smile. “besides, you’ve proven my point,” he remarked, “i’m guessing your business doesn’t take you to schools very often but i bet it’s not the first time that you’ve called someone that. however distorted, this phrase is clearly out there in the big bad world so why isn’t it in here,” he gestured around his room, “more?” he’d hit on a sort of interesting point. i was proud of him. i decided to stay another minute. “anyhow, you don’t understand, those classes aren’t a program. they’re just a series of classes. and schools don’t have to offer them, they’re optional. they’re not in special education; they’re in the vocational education area.15 they’re supposed to be better paced for slow learning students and more connected to the practical use of what’s being taught, more hands-on. there are some problems though, with these classes. one of the main ones is that the students who complete these classes don’t get a full high school diploma, they get something called a certificate of achievement.16 i’ve never thought that was right. a lot of the kids and their parents aren’t very fond of this distinction, they find it demeaning. i’ve always thought a lot more students could benefit from these classes than the few who end up enrolling in them and less kids are signing up for k & e classes at my school every year. from what i can tell, school districts around here aren’t that crazy about k & e either. several schools in this city that specialized in k & e have been shut down recently and a lot of composite schools are no longer even offering discrete k & e classes to slower learning students in their populations either. at best, they’re borrowing from 15 ibid. (p. 41) 16 ibid. (p. 21) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 12 the k & e curriculum to make the work easier for slower students in large, faster-paced high school diploma level classes, which i’m not sure are the safest places for slow learners. but it’s hard to justify separate k & e classes of seven or eight students to administrators who are worried about regular education class sizes of forty students. they’d rather just use the k & e teachers as regular teachers to keep these numbers down. i’m constantly hearing we just need to offer the weaker students the k & e curriculum in the regular classes.” “why do you think it’s a bad idea to offer classes that combine the k & e kids with the regular students?” i asked. “it’s not always a bad idea, i mean the education system is always supposed to be getting more inclusive for everyone, and the k & e students are in a lot of the regular classes, like option classes and religion classes, if it’s a catholic school, with everyone else. but, and i know this doesn’t make me sound very inclusive, there’s some things about large core classes, you know english, math, science and social studies, how they’re set up and how they’re often taught, how they’re assessed, that can make them unsafe places for slow learners. these were the sorts of classes k & e students have been meeting failure in for their whole careers, before coming into k & e.” just then the laser printer a student was trying to print something out on made a grinding sound followed by a series of beeps. williamson’s colleague was still working with the math students, so he had to go over and fix the paper jam. he came back and starting talking immediately, now seeming to rush his words a bit. the pre-school tutorial period would be over any minute. “so you definitely need to look into k & e. and for that matter, maybe you need to look into some formal special education programs, or in some formal special education labels too.” “why would i do that?” i asked. “you said slow learners can’t be found there.” “i said slow learners can’t officially be found there, but don’t be so sure. besides, if you are looking for a suspect on the lam, doesn’t finding out where he didn’t go, and why, sometimes lead you to where he is?” though oversimplified, this was sort of true, and i indicated my acceptance with a slight nod. “oh, and one more thing,” my potential client cautioned, “there’s something else, you can’t go into this unarmed, it’s too risky.” “gotcha. i’ve got a sidearm in my luggage back at the hotel. i call her candace.17 she gets cranky if i don’t take her out once in a while.” “please don’t talk that way in my learning centre, it’s violent and misogynistic.” i chose not to comment on the kinds of video games i saw the kids playing, so furtively, on the computers when we came in. williamson seemed to have a pretty selective understanding of what happened in his learning centre. he continued, “besides, that’s not what i meant. you are going to need to be armed with some sort of research philosophy, some kind of method.” 17 see jackson (2014, p. 359). in the television series based on mickey spillane’s popular detective novels, the protagonist, mike hammer affectionately names his large sidearm ‘betsy’. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 13 “what do you know about detective methods?” i demanded. “a client sees a couple of actors in the movies playing good cop / bad cop and he thinks he knows how detectives work. my methods are my business.” “i don’t know about being a detective,” williamson admitted, “but this is an educational research issue, and i know that can get messy and convoluted. a topic like this, i’d think begs for some strategy that helps you work with language and metaphysics, keeps you moving forward practically instead of getting lost in all of it. something that enables you to avoid the false clues and see what’s hidden.” “don’t try to impress me with this talk of educational research,” i warned. “i know jargon when i hear it. it sounds more like you’ve been reading too much sherlock holmes. you think it’s some kind of method or set of principles that helps you sort out the real clues from the red herrings. i don’t adopt any one method because if i did i might miss things. that’s where most of the police i work with, even the sharp ones, go wrong. i keep my mind and my eyes open, i wear out my shoes, i ask a lot of questions, and i know when to grease palms and when to twist wrists. and i have experience. i rarely begin investigating any two cases the same way, but in the end i usually get my clients the truth, sometimes more than they can handle. so, i won’t be told by any client how to work. i’ve turned down better paying and better looking clients than you when they tried to make similar demands. you want me, this is what you get.” i hadn’t intended to reveal that much but conversing with this schoolteacher had somehow brought out the lecturer in me too. “i don’t want to argue,” he said wearily. “but this is a special case. one that’s going to involve parsing a lot of knowledge claims you’ve never heard before. please, just consider some interpretive method to arm yourself with, or to add to your toolbox or whatever.”18 i could tell by his metaphors he had gone from making a demand to offering a suggestion. i could ignore a suggestion, so i was content to leave it at that. even though i had no intention of following up on whatever he was recommending, i kind of liked the toolbox idea. i didn’t want to hear williamson talk about it anymore, but i filed it in my mental gallery of curiosities. i changed the subject by asking if there were any other leads i should check out. “well, you might want to talk to some other teachers to clarify if this disappearance is as serious a concern as i think it is. you might want to find out if they’ve heard ‘slow learner’ as a concept as rarely as i have, and find out how they manage with students with this profile, without having much by way of resources or guidelines to help them. also, maybe some other researchers have done similar investigations or, at least, related work. i can’t be the only one who has ever noticed this disappearance. you need to check that out.” “anything else?” 18 “i would like my books to be a kind of tool-box which others can rummage through to find a tool which they can use however they wish in their own area...,” foucault (1974, pp. 523-524). williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 14 “that’s pretty much all i can think of. there’s probably all sorts of places you’ll end up going that i haven’t anticipated but that’s all i have for now.” there was still one thing i didn’t understand. “i’m sure this has been bothering you for years; so, why do we need to investigate this now? why not last year? why not next year?” “like i said i’m getting worried for k & e. right now we have separate k & e classes in every core area, but i don’t know how long we’ll be allowed to sustain this with the low enrolments we’ve been having. i’m afraid the slow learners will just get dumped in regular classes with no additional supports one year, and the numbers of students registered for k & e will be so low there won’t be anything i will be able to say to stop it. that and i’m finding it harder to work through the frequent lack of resources and understanding of what these kids need lately.” “that’s rough, princess. i suggest a few doubles after work. you’ll sleep like a baby and be too numb to be so bothered the next day.” he looked pained, again. this was sort of fun. i thought i might have to take the case just so i could offend his sensibilities for a few days. if he’d hired me for my misanthropic tendencies, i’d make sure he got his money’s worth. if i took the case that is. he recovered some of his dignity and, once again, clarified. “well, it’s not just that. i’m hearing of some new things going on in special education. many of the researchers who look at special ed., not to mention the students, parents, and teachers who are stakeholders in special education, have been saying it’s too regimented, too much based on a deficit model, and more medical than educational. they’ve been saying this in the field for years.19 alberta education is starting to listen. they might finally be looking critically at some past or current practices and attempt to move away from the formality of codes and disabilities. i don’t know as much about all this, except that part of the aim is to make school more flexible for all learners. i hear they’re looking not only to reform special education, but the whole alberta curriculum to promote this kind of flexibility.20 i want to make sure the needs of slow learners don’t get forgotten in these changes.” “i get it. when they start digging the past mischief up, you want to make sure they find all the bodies.” i’d startled him again with my choice of words; it was too easy. with summoned patience he clarified, “well, maybe that’s necessary as a beginning, but i’m more worried about making sure the needs of slow learners are addressed in whatever new system they come up with.” so here it was; the crisis i’d been waiting to hear about. there was some urgency here. it was more than this strange man’s trepidations. there might really be something i could help solve here. i was curious, and something about those stories williamson had been telling got to me. i weighed my options. what was the worst thing that could happen? actually that wasn’t the right question. the worst thing that could happen was that i would freeze to death chasing down 19 alberta education (2009a, pp. 2-3) 20 alberta education (2009b, pp. 5-8) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 15 empty leads and not be discovered until the spring thaw. but the case seemed interesting enough, some wrongs to right and some rent money to earn along the way. it might have just been the bad coffee from the hotel, but i felt a twinge in my gut telling me that i ought to help this guy. just then, another crisis. the bell williamson told me would ring soon – did. williamson and i watched through the office window as a new set of kids began to filter into the room. “my homeroom class,” williamson told me. i could see he had to get back to work. looked like our meeting was coming to an end. he needed an answer. i wanted to say something hopeful, but i still wanted to hear him beg one more time before i agreed. “that’s not a bad start williamson. the parts that make sense, i mean. a better collection of leads than i normally get.” he actually blushed. “thanks. like the kids, i guess, i may need help but i’m not helpless.” sounded like he’d said that before. “will you please take the case?” “one hundred and twenty-five dollars a day plus expenses.” we shook hands to seal the deal. williamson’s aim seemed to have improved since his last attempt at the social convention with me a few minutes ago in the main office. he managed to made contact with all of the appropriate digits this time. iii sitting in the buick with windshield wipers fending off a slow but insistent snowfall, i realized i had no idea where to start. i had to do something though. a paying case is always good, but i didn’t want to be stuck in this city any longer than i had to and this unnaturally early meeting had left me with a lot of day to work with. more often than not, i like to work by stirring things up instead of piecing things together, looking hard at what comes to the surface, but i didn’t even really know where to stir. i knew i wouldn’t be going to the methods store or wherever williamson thought i would go to find some kind of research method. i’d be just fine without any of this, i didn’t get hard-boiled overnight and besides, i always had candace if i got myself into trouble. williamson had lent me his public library and university library cards so i could get up to speed on the case. i had a roughly similar general appearance, aside from being slimmer and better dressed, and i thought maybe a nice warm library might be a good place to check up on some of the facts of williamson’s story. i still didn’t entirely trust this strange, earnest client. he seemed, at times a moralizing boy scout, at other times a delusional fool. what kind of man hires a detective to look for an educational category? still, every now and then i thought i heard in things he said echoes of some of the same “fierce grief” i feel.21 grief over not fitting in, or not buying in, being too troubled by all the little wayward things others take for granted, having a nose too sensitive to the rot. in the sick little world where i operate, the sheen of nobility this gives me is about as useful as a cereal box sheriff’s badge. i wondered what it did for williamson. 21 hamilton (1987, p. 25) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 16 i drove to the downtown public library, and then, annoyed, progressively further away from the library as all the nearby lots were full. i reluctantly parked in a lot that was neither close nor affordable and walked several chilly blocks. reaching my destination, i passed through a metal detector overseen by an ancient sentry. i’d guessed there might be such security and begrudgingly left candace locked and lonely in the trunk of the buick. i found a computer station to work at in a row of cubicles near the back of the library. i sat myself down in a little patch of heaven, a graffiti-strewn cubicle with chipped particle board and a hard plastic chair and a desktop computer with greasy keys and a smudged screen. i began to look up subjects on the library computer. i thought maybe i’d verify what williamson had begun to tell me about slow learners in our first meeting. it was weird, as soon as i entered the phrase “slow learner” the library catalogue computer seemed to slow down. despite this, i managed to locate a recent book on the topic in their holdings. it was called slow learners: their psychology and instruction,22 and a copy was available at this branch. i left my trench coat on the chair to mark my place and walked up the stairs, retrieved the book from one of the shelves and returned to my station. i noticed that while i was upstairs, i had acquired a neighbor in the cubicle beside me. he didn’t seem particularly sociable or even conscious. a head of matted hair rested, facing away from me, on a huge fleshy forearm. a formless grey overcoat concealed the rest of my companion’s appearance, but i could detect the sickly sweet smell of rot. classy joint. the cover of the book depicted a child of twelve or thirteen sitting backwards on a chair, maybe to emphasize his perceived backwardness as a slow learner. he was staring out at me with a look that was both forlorn and somewhat vacant. reading the introduction, i noticed that the authors authoritatively stated the i.q. levels williamson had only mentioned approximately. also, i observed they seemed to think they had pretty much everything else figured out about slow learners too. the experience of educators confirms that there are many children who are so backward in basic subjects that they need special help. these pupils have limited scope for achievement. they have intelligence quotients between 76 and 89 and they constitute about 18 percent of the total school population. these students do not stand out as very different from their classmates except that they are always a little slow on the uptake and are often teased by the other students because of their slowness. they are quite well built physically but rather clumsy and uncoordinated in movement. they are no trouble in school. although much of the work is difficult for them, they are patient and cooperative …they need help in the form of special class [sic] in ordinary school. most slow learners struggle along in ordinary classes failing to have the special attention which they need.23 “wow,” i thought, “could it be true that almost a fifth of the students in any given school are just like this?” that smelled funny so i checked out another source on the computer. this time an 22 see reddy, ramar, & kusama (2006). 23 ibid. (p. 4) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 17 article written by an american psychologist answering a series of faqs or ‘frequently asked questions’ about slow learners on the website “schoolpsychogistfiles.com”.24 a “slow learner” is not a diagnostic category, it is a term people use to describe a student who has the ability to learn necessary academic skills, but at rate and depth below average same age peers. in order to grasp new concepts, a slow learner needs more time, more repetition, and often more resources from teachers to be successful. reasoning skills are typically delayed, which makes new concepts difficult to learn. at this point, the website quoted the same iq numbers that williamson and the previous book mentioned. but then the writer made this interesting clarification: those who fall two standard deviations below the mean are often identified as having an intellectual disability (iq below 70). a slow learner does not meet criteria for an intellectual disability (also called mental retardation) [sic]. however, she learns slower than average students and will need additional help to succeed.25 all this sorting into cozy little boxes was making me miss my little warm hotel room. i was tired. i noticed my companion in the next cubicle had disappeared; i chided myself for missing this when it happened. still, he’d seemed harmless. i gave myself a couple of quick slaps to the face and concentrated on my search again. i was looking for a different perspective on this classification process and found a study in an online journal that offered just that. this article was pretty technical. still, i was able to piece together that these authors didn’t like how psychologists and educators, in their opinions, often overused the idea of “low average” in describing the traits and needs of students. low average, i realized, described the very same iq range as slow learners were said to have. they said low average carried the risk of being a self-fulfilling prophecy for children without the benefit of being a label that leads to additional services. in addition to this, the authors did an interesting experiment. they found one hundred and ninety-six archived i.q. tests from a private clinic in an urban centre in alberta and rescored these tests using a different scoring system that was also considered acceptable in the field. they found that a full eighteen percent of the classifications changed by one category, from low average to average for example. no wonder these slow learners were elusive. you could make them come and go by how you scored the test. the authors who did the rescoring experiment, like williamson, were pretty critical about the practice of denying struggling students’ special education services on the basis of their low average iq tests. i wondered why this would even happen. i found an answer to this, though not a very satisfying one, in the psychologist’s website i was looking at earlier. it was in her answer to an f. a. q. “if these students struggle so much, why do are they often not eligible for special education?” special education services are provided for students who have a disability. slow learners typically do not have a disability, even though they need extra support. cognitive abilities are too high 24 king (2014, para. 1) 25 ibid. (para. 2) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 18 for these learners to be considered for an intellectual disability. however, the abilities are usually too low to be considered for a learning disability. consider that a learning disability consists of discrepancies between average abilities and below average academics, coupled with a processing deficit. schools often look for a discrepancy between a student's ability and where they are performing. slow learners tend to perform at their ability level, which is below average. to the disappointment of many, slow learners often do not receive special education services.26 i was still a little shaky about the claims these sources were making about this group of students, but now something new was bugging me too. if i had it right, it seemed strange to me that in many jurisdictions a special education system had evolved such that it routinely excluded from special services a whole group of learners that the intelligence tests it seemed to value so highly predicted would struggle at school. where have the slow learners gone, indeed? maybe my foolish client was on to something after all. a little thrill of danger ran down my spine. i scrolled back through some psychology websites without, i didn’t think, learning much of direct relevance. then it occurred to me that i did know, from my conversation with williamson, a place where some of the slow learners in alberta had gone. it was an instructional tier offered to struggling high school students in some schools. williamson seemed to have mixed feelings about it. then again, i didn’t know what that meant either. williamson seemed to have mixed feelings about everything. i typed in knowledge and employability (k & e) classes and then, remembering the name of the previous slow learner program my client had told me about, i added “integrated occupational program (iop)” to the search too. i got several hits. i clicked on the information manuals for both programs and briefly scrolled through them looking for descriptions of the sorts of students they were intended for.27 though i was only skimming to get to the part about enrolment criteria, i couldn’t help but notice that the manual for the old program, iop, was much thicker, containing a lot more advice about how to support these students. i wondered why, but i put that question on the back burner. both manuals were pretty consistent with what the psychology books had said about slow learners as well as what williamson had told me. the recommended populations for both k & e, and iop before it, were supposed to have low average iqs, show up as behind grade level in their skills and grades in their core subjects, be more adept at concrete learning, and be at risk of not being able to complete the regular high school diploma. i selected the third item down called “accountability pillar results for annual education results report” because i wanted to know who was accountable for these classes.28 i always wanted to know who was accountable. i was rewarded with a complex document showing various statistics about student achievement, and about parent and student perceptions about the general quality of education in the province. “dead end,” i thought. it wasn’t telling me anything about k & e or slow learners. i was about to close the site when i saw the phrase ‘high school completion rate’. this seemed important, but why? i remembered williamson griping that the students who took this level of classes left school with a credential called the k & e certificate, a credential widely seen as less valuable than the alberta high school diploma.29 surely if there were even half as 26 ibid. (para. 3) 27 alberta education (1989, p. 3) 28 see alberta education (2010) 29 alberta education (2004, p. 10) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 19 many slow learners around as the previous data claimed, and they really did have as tough of a time in school as the information about the categories suggested, these k & e classes would be an inevitable path for many of them. the completion results would surely show a significant minority of alberta’s students earning the k & e certificate instead of the high school diploma. i started to look at the stats on this. now that i was in the right section they were easy to find, but not so easy to believe. in 2009, 30,689 students completed high school in three years having earned a high school diploma; 305 completed earning a k & e certificate of achievement. in 2008, 30,500 students completed high school with the diploma, 266 completed with the certificate in the same year. in 2007, 30,105 diplomas, 255 certificates.30 i rubbed my eyes and looked again, i thought maybe i’d missed a zero. if up to eighteen percent of students were slow learners why were less than one percent of students completing high school with the credential intended for slow learners? “maybe the high school diploma route isn’t so bad for them,” i thought. “maybe most of the slow learners manage to scrape through at the higher instructional level.” but what if they didn’t? i looked at the dropout rates for the same five years. for several years running, a quarter of the year’s cohort of potential graduates had not completed high school within the three expected years; completion rates rose a little to eighty percent when another two years beyond the expected three were added.31 i wondered how many of the dropouts were slow learners? “how do students get lost?” i pondered for a second. i realized one of the main ways was by not completing school. the mystery was coming into focus for me. i felt all tingly; the hairs on the back of my neck were standing at attention. my tingly feeling was suddenly joined by a duller and more menacing sensation, a large arm encircling my throat. so eager had i been to begin my investigation, put this case to bed nice and early, i hadn’t taken a wary enough look at my foul neighbor at the next computer station and now he was choking me from behind. the full force of the rotting stench hit me with the last breath i was able to take before he cinched my throat shut. as massive, fleshy arms tightened around me, i brought my feet up to my desk and pushed backwards with all my strength. the desk thudded against the wall, giving me what i thought was good leverage for dislodging my assailant, but he easily absorbed the force and the chokehold just got tighter. my peripheral vision beheld a close-up view of a pallid, shapeless face and a staring eye, black as an eight ball. i wrenched to one side, and the hold just got tighter. i looked to the entrance of the library; the ancient guard was asleep in his chair. straining, i gripped my assailant’s thumb and upper wrist with both hands and tried to wrench it backwards to break his grip. his skin felt cold, and a large pulpy wad of it tore off and skidded across the cubicle. it came to rest on the upper left corner of the computer keyboard, concealing the escape key. in the reflection on the monitor, i saw his wrist glowing faintly pink in the spot i attacked, i guessed maybe there might be a beating heart under all that, but he was otherwise unharmed and constricting my neck more tightly than ever. a brightly colored figure flickered in and out of my range of vision but i wasn’t sure if it was real. someone had a problem with me investigating this category – i wondered who? my indignation at the story arriving at this point was short-lived as everything went black. 30 alberta education (2010) 31 ibid. (p. 4) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 20 i was in a lineup outside a factory, waiting to be measured. a machine was doing the measuring. once i was measured it would put me in a box. depending on which box i was in, the machine would pick me up and push me through one of five chutes and down one of five tracks for further assembly. it was a big factory and the chutes were too small to enable a long look down the lines. beyond the first few stations, i couldn’t see where any of the tracks were leading. i arrived at the machine. a pair of mechanized arms with a crudely marked stick measured my height and width. a box was selected from a shelf overhead and lowered to the ground. i lay down, curled in the box. my arm stuck out. instead of lifting my box onto the shelf as it had with the others, the mechanized arm tried to push my arm back down into the box, but it still stuck out. a mechanized arm held my human arm. a mechanized arm drew a line across my human arm. a mechanized arm held a dull saw, i wriggled my human arm to escape. “mr. hunter!” “mr. hunter!” williamson was shaking my arm trying to rouse me awake. i was in a coffee room inside what was likely the private staff area of the library, laid out on a threadbare couch. someone had loosened my tie and collar and someone had, apparently, poured a couple of teaspoons of drool into the lapel pocket of my blazer. williamson told me that a little girl who had wandered away from her mom had reported to her mother that a man was being attacked by some kind of monster at the back of the library. she, i realized, was the brightly colored blur i’d seen; at least i’d kicked up enough of a fuss to attract her attention. though not entirely comprehending her, her mom had roused the security guard from his slumber to check out whatever her daughter had thought she’d seen. before the guard got to me, my assailant had apparently escaped undetected. i’d been found unconscious at the cubicle, but they assumed the little girl, whom i owed my life, had only imagined the monster. the staff, used to people falling asleep in the library, had assumed i had a temporary ailment brought on by recreational overindulgence or professional overwork, and that i needed no medical intervention except for rest. perhaps due to my professional appearance, in lieu of calling the authorities, they had kindly moved me to this couch to sleep off whatever i had. williamson’s business card had fallen out of my pocket, so they called him to retrieve me. i was really out of it. the diabolically cold weather, the early morning, the educational research and the apparent zombie had all conspired to put me out for several hours. it was now four o’clock. i had a glass of water and assured the staff i was ok. williamson asked me what had happened, but instead of explaining it right there, i asked him to take me somewhere licensed and seedy, where our conversation would not be overheard by interested parties. it wasn’t hard to find such a place. on the short but chilly walk there, my wet lapel pocket froze, and i felt a sliver of ice near my heart. a few patrons glanced up at us with tired hostility, and glanced down again into their beer. we had to step lightly over several spots of uneven tile, found two stable barstools that were unoccupied and sat. an indifferent server wiped the scratched tabletop, leaving a sheen of grease from her cloth, and then she vanished into thin air, like the slow learners i was looking for. i counted nine dead flies in the lamp overhead. williamson looked uncomfortable. this place was perfect. as we waited for the waitress to return, i told williamson how i’d been attacked. his face assumed a distressed countenance and he asked for more details. i told him he’d need a drink to help him absorb the news and got up to order from the bar. he reluctantly agreed but asked me if williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 21 i thought it was wise to be drinking after losing consciousness like i had. i told him i get knocked out often and that this was my standard treatment. i had a shot of something that burned pleasingly at the bar and returned to the table with a pint for each of us. i took a long swallow and told him what i’d learned about the case so far. i told him i thought i was off to a good start before being attacked. he fidgeted. then i told him about how my assailant resembled nothing so much as a zombie. he stopped fidgeting and began shaking. i described my objections to my own perception of this, “it doesn’t belong. sure, i often experience this world as a place gone all wrong, but that’s just being realistic. there’s no room in my thinking for monster stories.” williamson’s face reddened and he glared at me. “i told you this was dangerous territory and to look into a research method. i said it was very important. you ignored me. look where that left you, senseless in a library. that zombie–like thing did you a favor; you were in too deep too soon. who knows, maybe it was even trying to warn you about something.” “i think i did well,” i protested. “i confirmed how slow learner is defined, at least psychologically, and more about the problems with the category that you were trying to explain to me. i saw how few students complete the k & e certificate provincially.” remembering himself, williamson took a deep breath and settled down. “i am surprised the completion rate is that low,” he admitted. “but that just helps confirm my suspicions that a lot of slow learners are disappearing. it doesn’t really explain why. and you tipped someone off about our investigation and let them get the drop on you. you’ve got to be more careful. a dead shamus isn’t much use to me.” he took another copy of his business card out of his wallet. i wondered if he was secretly excited to finally have someone to hand them to. he wrote a name and address down on the back of it and handed me the card. he said he’d met a teacher at a session at a conference that might have some insider knowledge of where the slow learners had gone. her name was colleen birdseye. he gave me an address to look her up. he said that talking to her would probably be a safer lead to follow up while i got my bearings on the case. he told me to call him when i’d learned ‘something useful’ and then got up to leave, leaving a half-empty pint behind him. the waitress returned from oblivion and i asked her for a menu. my ordeal had left me hungry. i ordered a club sandwich that i hoped wouldn’t be too vile and another beer to sit on its shoulders and hold it down just in case.32 soon i’d have to trek back to the buick. i might even get to try out my technique of scraping ice off the windshield with an almost maxed out credit card. i looked at the flies in the lamp again, sleeping the big sleep,33 basking in the warm white light. lucky devils. iv 32 chandler (1964, p. 9). the personification about the sandwich is borrowed from this source. 33 chandler (1992, p. 230) williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 22 i drove to the address on the card. it was six blocks off the main drag in a partially hidden little strip that also contained a pawn shop and a used books and trading cards store. i had to turn hard when i finally spotted the place out of the corner of my eye, and the buick slid on the ice for a minute before it found its traction again and took me in. i parked and entered a gym. i’m six feet when not slouching, and solid enough too, but the muscle-bound gargoyle at the reception desk looked to have eighty pounds on me. beside him, the computer, the phone, and the desk all looked like toy versions of themselves designed for toddlers already being trained for the high power business world. still, he’d been domesticated for customer service, and when i asked if i could just observe the class for a while, being interested in maybe signing myself up as a student, he assented with a friendly smile. i thought if i asked if he could crush my head for me too he would have agreed with equal sociability. the gym smelled of seven brands of fermenting sweat. on a mat to the right was a fit, diminutive girl with dark hair restrained by a functional ponytail. she was wearing thai boxing shorts and a t-shirt that read, “if you had any questions in the academy you had to wrestle plato.” she was taking turns practising a sparring move with a much larger man. it involved a hip throw followed up with an arm wrenching submission hold. she executed her turns with the ease of putting on a coat, but her partner was less graceful. she had to coach him through every turn. i could see a hint of tightly controlled aggression in her throws, despite her patience with her partner. i was getting a little dizzy watching all the flipping when, mercifully, they took a break. her gym bag, which she now approached to get some water, was along the main wall near where i was watching from. i went over to her. “looks like your partner is a pretty slow learner,” i remarked. “we’re all slow learners at something,” she replied. “besides he’s new.” “still, he’s twice your size and you can’t weigh much more than a buck-ten. and you’re a girl. what a loser.” “this stuff isn’t so easy to pick up on at first,” she said. “i bet i could do better,” i challenged. by then her partner had moved on to the heavy bags, gloved up, and looked to be investing much thought in the simple combinations he was arhythmically throwing. she brought me out to the mat and challenged me to attempt the same throw on her. a good right hook and a few dirtier moves were more my style, but i’d grappled my share too, and expected little resistance as i attempted the toss. suddenly, though, i was trying to hoist a five-foot two hunk of lead. next, i was seeing an exit sign upside down, thudding onto my back, and feeling my arm straightened and bent slowly back the wrong way. decorum demanded i should tap her to submit at this point, but i had one more shot left. “did k & e make you this tough?” i gasped. confused, she released her grip. i sat up and rubbed my arm. i explained how williamson, whose name seemed to register on her, had sent me to her to find out if she’d seen the slow learners. she agreed to meet me for coffee when the class was over. for the next twenty minutes, she williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 23 kicked some focus pads with a trainer, each strike bursting like a firecracker, and i stood along the wall and rubbed my arm some more. i followed her to a chain coffee shop back along the main drag. we milled through the ordering line obtaining a milk and a coffee respectively. i offered to buy her beverage but before i could insist she flipped me a gold-colored coin with a bird on it. we found a table. looking a little less spartan with an oversize hooded sweatshirt and a friendly smile on, i realized she was rather pretty. i could also read from her eyes that she beheld me in only professional curiosity, which was fine with me. i didn’t want any distractions on this case. i wanted out of this city. “you look pretty strong,” she remarked. “i didn’t expect you to be that easy to throw.” “well, you took me by surprise,” i had to admit. “and besides, i’m always tougher in the last reel.” wearying already of this small talk, i asked what she knew about where the slow learners might be. “right here, maybe,” she said with just a hint of irony. “they thought i was a slow learner when i was in school.34 i was placed in the integrated occupation program when i was in junior high school. this was years ago when it first came into the alberta education system.” if it weren’t for the way she said it, i would have said williamson had found me the perfect informant, a self-described slow learner. she’d been in the programs. maybe she’d seen some other slow learners along the way. i tried to engage her in talk of her own experiences a little, to tease some more information out of her. “i don’t get it. you don’t seem that slow to me. how could that be? how did you end up there?” “i … uh … couldn’t read. i basically got through elementary school without being able to read. just faking my way through it. then i came to calgary in grade seven and they tested me and found i had a grade one-ish reading level. i could pick things up if i had to, but my comprehension was really low. i had a huge gap in my learning. and they did tons of testing and then they threw me in iop. they thought that was the best place for me. and then the iop people said ‘she’s not iop’ so they threw me in gifted education. and then they finally gave up on me.” “you mean they finally just let you be? do you mean things got better?” “no. i mean i dropped out. i didn’t finish high school. all my learning, i did as an adult. i think that’s what happens with a lot of our kids.” i didn’t know who the ‘our’ were. i assumed it was all the teachers who worked with slow learners. she continued, “the shuffling around and the stigma that goes with k & e, i mean that was with iop too. if you were in iop you were one of 34 aside from some fictionalization to locate them as characters in the narrative, the opinions given and experiences described by teachers, students, administrators, and curriculum leaders are from my interviewees and any character located in a realistic role in education is based on an actual interviewee. i interviewed eight teachers, administrators or curriculum leaders, and four students. for the character named colleen birdseye, as well as the later interviews with the group of students, i took the quotations directly from transcripts of our audio-recorded conversations. for all other interviewees, the quotations were reassembled based on my notes of our conversations. in all cases the quotations were verified with these sources before being used in this work. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 24 those kids. the stigma that goes with that program prevents kids that should be in there from going in there.” “but you’re a teacher now, and that takes a degree, doesn’t it? how did you get back into the school system?” as well as thinking a story like this might help me track down slow learners or at least understand how students got called slow learners, i was genuinely curious. “well, i was working in a mechanics shop. that was what i was going to be. that was my plan, so i didn’t think dropping out of high school would have a huge impact on going to sait or my apprenticeship.35 so that was what i was going to do but i had a really bad injury on the job – wheelchair and everything, so i couldn’t do the job anymore. i could now obviously, but i couldn’t physically pick anything up then. i was like, ok what am i going to do with my life? so, i went to mount royal college as a mature student and failed miserably a few times, but back then that college was really good with students with learning gaps and they worked with me, and i finally started to see success at school. that was, let’s see my daughter was two then, so i would have been twenty-two. and i went from there. i just got better as a student as the years went on.” “do you think your experiences are pretty typical? are lots of bright kids with learning issues like you had misplaced in k & e?” i realized i was asking my questions two at a time now, but i was excited. i was in the middle of the tempest of category confusion that i’d been learning about. williamson had found me a good informant. colleen birdseye took a sip of her milk. “well that’s always a big argument for not placing in k & e. a k & e student is not a learning disabled student. there’s this distinct higher / lower hierarchy between ld and k & e and i think it does a few injustices.” i discerned that ld probably stood for “learning disabled” as colleen birdseye continued to explain the injustices of the hierarchy. “one, it assumes that a student who is at a k & e level can’t have a ld because they aren’t smart enough, which is completely false. most of the kids i’ve taught in k & e have learning disabilities as well. and, it again perpetuates that idea that if they’re in k & e they can’t do anything else. whereas if you’re just coded with a learning disability, you’re capable of doing everything as long as you have the right accommodations.” williamson had mentioned accommodations to me as well but i forgot what they were so i asked. colleen birdseye explained that they were things like providing students with extra time on tests, access to a staff member or technology to read tests out loud, and / or a scribe to record their writing for them. these things were supposed to make things fairer for students with disabilities, but not change the difficulty of the tests or assignments on a conceptual level. i thought for a second this was a pretty sweet deal for the disabled kids. but then i wondered why there was a whole institutional process just for qualifying for these things. i’d known some keen-eyed p.i.’s who avoided reading like it was consumption, and almost all my colleagues dictated their letters to a secretary; if they could afford one. not me, i could barely keep myself on the payroll so i did my own clerical work. that, and i found the rhythm of pounding on the computer keys relaxing’; like a little army of speed bags to bip bip with my fingers. as a p.i. who didn’t use those socalled accommodations then, i was in the minority. as for time, we billed by the day, extra time williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 25 was always better, at least until the client ran out of money or patience. that was just how we did it. so this concept of accommodation was foreign to me. as i considered this, i felt a teacher’s eyes on me and realized my mind was wandering. i apologized, and said it had been a long day and pleaded that my informant continue explaining her concerns. after a minute, she did. “my issue is this hierarchy between seeing a better person and a not-as-good person. there’s certainly issues with being learning disabled too, but with k & e it’s often viewed as kids that aren’t worth putting the effort into.” “sounds like you think that it isn’t strictly slow learners who end up being placed in k & e classes,” i paraphrased, just to keep the conversation going. then i came up with another question. “does the concept of slow learner affect your work in any way?” “the term itself? it doesn’t impact me, i wouldn’t say. it does impact people. when i have a k & e student, i have to be aware they’re a k & e student, but at the same time i run a classroom that is diversified anyways, personalized anyways. actually personalized, not just the word personalized because it’s trendy. i mean i’ve taught classes – i had one class that was a 30-4, 30-2, and 30-1 class and, honestly, i loved it.35 it didn’t matter if it was kids in 30-4 or 30-1, they all needed personalization for their learning.” i had no idea what all the levels she was reeling off meant; it was like alphabet soup, but with numbers, to me. but i thought asking her to clarify might have been a further distraction. with all this confusion of definitions and talk of personalization, i was already worried she was being kind of cagey about whether or not she’d seen the slow learners recently. maybe williamson was wrong in his recommendation, and i had followed him by being wrong in my initial impression that this was a good informant. it sounded like she didn’t even believe in the category. it was time for a blunt question to see. “is there such a thing as slow learners?” i asked. “i did presentations and stuff at teachers’ convention on k & e learners. ‘the k & e learner’ and that kind of thing. one of the big things that i always tried to focus on was what k & e is now; and, if people really want to teach it, this is what they need to keep in mind, it is complex learners you end up working with. you could have a gifted kid in a k & e class who has decided to swear at the teachers way too many times or hasn’t handed stuff in, so they assume they don’t understand. being aware of that when you’re teaching and giving the kids a chance is what matters.” that wasn’t a straight answer either. this was all very interesting, but i wasn’t sure it was much use in my search for the slow learners. it seemed every time i brought up some kind of problem related to teaching slow learners, something that might help me track them down, she acknowledged it, sure, but then got quickly back to talking about the teaching practices she thought were good for slow learners and maybe every student. was she being cagey, or did she just think it had more to do with teaching? i tried to use this teaching idea to challenge her sense of pride to loosen things up. “does it affect how you’re perceived as a teacher, working with k & e students?” 35 alberta education (2014, pp. 1, 6). the provincial english language arts curriculum is tiered into a more academic grade 12 english course, 30-1, a less academic course 30-2, and the k & e level 30-4. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 26 “yes, definitely. the most obvious was when my school district closed down two k & e schools, one of which i was teaching at. coming out of the k & e schools that got closed down, you were ‘must place’ in new schools. coming from k & e, you’re seen as ‘less than’ as a teacher. in general, you’re not seen as a capable teacher of so-called ‘regular kids’, so definitely it changes the perception.” something bothered me about her use of the phrase “k & e school.” i made a mental note to think more about it and follow it up if needed, but i wanted to maintain the momentum of the conversation, so i said something agreeable instead of questioning her on this. “yeah, williamson says even though he’s been to grad school, he thinks people still talk to him slower because he’s in special education.” this wasn’t strictly speaking true but it seemed like something williamson might say. she laughed. it was a nice laugh; all amusement, no malice. i tended to prefer a little malice. “yes, exactly, they assume ‘you’re not as smart as us’. and even teaching style – i tend to teach in an inquiry style of learning, and very art-based, and a lot of art brought into the classroom. and that’s seen as fluff learning. ‘you’re a k & e teacher and you don’t understand how to teach.’ well, yeah, i do actually.” i thought i caught an edge to her voice – that i had her for a minute – but she’d stated this all so matter of factly, no derision. and there she was talking about teaching style again. why did teaching style matter so much? what tack to try next? maybe if i kept working the critical angle i could get her mad, and get her to point the finger at someone or some problem instead of all this talk of teaching styles. i remembered what i had read about the k & e completion rates. “if you go with a strict iq level, maybe 10 to 15 percent of students would have the iq levels of k & e students,” i began, “but only one percent or less of students graduate with the k & e certificate. why?” “i think it goes back to that stigma. back when i worked in the one of the k & e schools before they shut them down, my daughter was at a junior high here in calgary. she was in at the guidance office because she was in trouble for mouthing off or something. and she was told – and this counselor didn’t know where i taught – she was told if this behavior keeps up you will be in one of those schools taking k & e and you won’t graduate. from a guidance counselor. when it’s coming from that level, and it’s not only parents who see it as a bad thing to get a k & e certificate, but other staff members see it as well, and kids don’t want to do it. so you end up with kids who go into -2 levels and aren’t able to do it and end up dropping out, maybe they end up taking the 2 level three times and are seen as behavior problems for not handing in their work. but it’s never seen as ‘if they were in k & e they could experience some success.’” number soup again. i could only assume that this “-2’ was the next level up from k & e. “does there have to be a k & e certificate?” i asked. i was thinking maybe if there was no certificate, the system would have no choice but to make more room for slow learners in the diploma route. were the slow learners hiding, or being hidden, in this obscure series of classes? williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 27 “i don’t know,” she admitted. “it’s a hard call,” she said after a pause. “i don’t even know if a high school diploma is even a necessary document. these kids, any kids, here’s what they’ve been able to do. a transcript will show these are the courses they’ve had successes in. at the end of the day, does it matter if they get a piece of paper signifying graduation too? i do think it’s important if they have a high school diploma that they continue to have a k & e certificate or some kind of completion certificate so these students that struggle in the so-called regular program are seeing an alternative with an end in sight. but i really don’t think either the certificate or diploma should be there. this is what they’re capable of doing, these are the courses they’ve shown success in. the transcripts themselves are enough information for colleges and universities and employers to decide if students qualify.” this conversation was taking on the pattern of an epic film. it started with a battle, offered a bit of hope, and then a dash of disappointment, and now here i was getting excited again about what she was telling me. school closures, bad stigma, and the idea of no diploma, i was feeling that same thrill of danger i began to feel in the library. it was more than the stories giving me this sense, i realized. i felt as though i was being watched. i looked around. a shady figure in a trench coat was watching me through the window of the coffee shop. noticing me noticing him, he began to retreat up the road. my conversation with colleen birdseye was important, but if i could catch this guy, i thought, it might break the case wide open. if i could find out who’d been out to get me ever since i typed ‘slow learner’ into the library catalogue, then maybe i could find out if someone was out to get slow learners – not only letting them fall through the cracks, but pushing them through. in twenty seconds i explained i had just realized i was late for another appointment, apologized for cutting this session short, and ran out of the coffee shop. it was snowing lightly again when i got outside, like salt falling from a gummed-up shaker. three streetlights up, half a block ahead, i saw that i hadn’t lost him. the trench-coated figure was pacing efficiently up the street. looking down for a second at his footprints in the skiff of snow that covered the sidewalk, i noted with surprise that they looked perfectly linear and every step appeared to cover exactly the same amount of distance. for several blocks, up streets, around corners, i strode to catch up, finding it hard to match the pace without breaking into a conspicuous sprint. for a while i remembered myself, taking in the road numbers, mailboxes, weird buildings, any other mental bread crumbs i might leave to find my way back. it grew too difficult as i strained to keep up. just as i started to close the distance between us, i skidded on some ice on the sidewalk, and fell on my backside and elbow. cursing, i rose to my feet and looked for my quarry. he had escaped into the shadows as i was falling. i looked around – i had lost my bearings too. with a few wrong turns, i made my way back to the coffee shop, walking away from the dimly lit sub-streets towards the bright traffic lights and billboards of the main drag. colleen birdseye’s car was gone. i heard a rattling in my shoe, and for a second i imagined my little toe had broken off in the cold, until reason took over and i understood a pebble had probably found its way in during my failed pursuit. i reached my car, scraped the window with the almost maxed out credit card, and drove to my hotel. i staggered wearily past a dozing desk clerk and down the hall. fumbling, and then finally inserting the key card correctly with frozen fingers, i made it into my room. i got under all my blankets, still wearing a suit soiled with the dirt of three falls during the day. i briefly pondered having a drink from the bottle in my suitcase before exhaustion bested williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 28 me, just like the library assailant, williamson’s friend, and the fleet-footed stalker had, and i fell asleep. to be continued… acknowledgements i would like to gratefully acknowledge drs. jim field, nancy moules, jim paul, and chris gilham; professor nick hodge, tracy williamson, em williamson, beth tobiasz, pat calon; all of the participants in the interviews conducted for this research; and my students. references alberta education (1989). integrated occupational program: manual for administrators, counsellors and teachers: interim 1989. edmonton, ab, canada: crown in right of alberta. https://archive.org/stream/integrateoccupation89albe#page/14/mode/2up. alberta education (2006). alberta education: selecting accommodations and strategies. edmonton, ab, canada: government of alberta. alberta education (2008). information manual for knowledge and employability courses. edmonton, ab, canada: alberta education curriculum branch. http://education.alberta.ca/ media/524889/infomanual.pdf. alberta education (2009a). setting the direction for special education in alberta: a review of the literature. edmonton, ab, canada: alberta education. alberta education (2009b). setting the direction towards a system re-design. edmonton, ab, canada: alberta education. alberta education (2010). accountability pillar results for annual education results reports (aerr), 2008, 2009, 2010. edmonton, ab, canada: alberta education. alberta education (2012). special education coding criteria. edmonton, ab, canada: government of alberta. alberta education (2014). provincially authorized senior high school courses and course codes including k–12 withdrawn courses and programs. edmonton, ab, canada: alberta education. https://education.alberta.ca/media/9118204/ coursecodes2014.pdf. calgary board of education (2004). advanced placement. calgary, ab, canada: cbe program renewal and media services. chandler, raymond (1940). farewell my lovely. new york, ny: ballantine. chandler, raymond (1964). the lady in the lake, in the raymond chandler omnibus. new williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 3 29 york, ny: alfred a. knopf, project gutenberg canada. http://www.gutenberg.ca/ebooks/chandlerr-ladyinthelake/chandlerr-ladyinthelake-00-h.html chandler, raymond (1992). the big sleep. new york, ny: first vintage crime / black lizard edition. claypool, t., murusiak, t. christopher, & janzen, h. (2008). ability and achievement variables in average, low average, and borderline students. alberta journal of educational research, 54(4), 432-447. couture, j.c. (2012). inclusion alberta’s educational palimpsest. ata magazine, 92(3), 54. foucault, m. (1974). prisons et asiles dans le mécanisme du pouvoir. in c. o’farrell (trans.) dits et ecrits volume ii. foucault. paris, france: gallimard. retrieved from http://www.michelfoucault.com/quote/2004q.html. hamilton, c. (1987). western and hard-boiled detective fiction in america from high noon to midnight (vol. 3). hong kong: university of iowa press. hammet, d. (1968). the maltese falcon. new york, ny: alfred a. knopf, harper colophon (originally published 1930). jackson, r. (2014). classic television action, crime & adventure: a pictorial history. bloomington, in: author house. king, e. (2014) faq: parents ask about struggling (slow) learners. school psychologist files. accessed october 19, 2014. http:// schoolpsychologistfiles.com/slowlearnerfaq/. mathew, n. (1984). industrial education in alberta its evolution and development, 1968-1982. unpublished master’s thesis, university of alberta, edmonton, ab, canada. mehan, h., herweck, a., & meihls, j.l. (1986). handicapping the handicapped: decision making in students’ educational careers. stanford, ca: stanford university press. reddy, g.l, ramar, r., & kusama, a. (2006). slow learners: their psychology and instruction. new delhi, india: discovery publishing house. sait polytechnic (2013). about sait. accessed from http://www.sait.ca/about-sait.php. schmid, d. (2008). manhood, modernity and crime fiction. in p. stoneley & c. weinstein (eds.) a concise companion to american fiction 1900 – 1950 (pp. 94 112). oxford, uk: blackwell. corresponding author: joan m humphries, rn phd university of victoria, camosun college email: humphriesj@camosun.bc.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 8, 2018 the author(s) 2018 my life flashed before my eyes: hermeneutic reflections on time joan m. humphries abstract the everyday experience of time can be disrupted by the events in our lives, and disquiet notions of predictability about the passage of time. in this work, i describe an alternate experience of time passing that occurred in the context of a car accident. the phrase "i saw my life flash before my eyes" situates the varietal experience of time in human existence, and invites the use of chosen hermeneutic tenets to explore the phenomena. i describe the mysterious personal experience of time associated with the accident, as well as varietal experiences of time that occur for people during hospitalization, relating to experiences of nursing practice. the tension associated with the temptation to apply scientific explanations to metaphysical questions, and the inevitability of accepting ongoing wonder about the mysteries of time, are featured throughout. keywords time, hermeneutics, nursing, philosophy, human science, metaphysics several years ago, when crossing the street as a pedestrian, a car struck me. i learned later that the driver was 18-years-old, and was distracted by conversation with her boyfriend, who was sitting in the passenger seat. as a result, she did not see me crossing the street, and because she was travelling so quickly, i did not see her in time to get out of the way, either. the important caveat to this account is that i am fine. i often wonder about the young girl who accidentally hit me. i imagine that she was a new driver, much like my own children, who were also new drivers at the time of the accident. i suspect she was distressed by the accident, just as i readily acknowledge my own distress. however, the most significant source of contemplation for me involves a peculiar experience of time that permeates my memory of the moment of impact, humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 1 2 when i had the experience of having my life flash before my eyes. the influence of the trauma to which i refer has appeared and subsided over the years. the meaning of the accident to the fullness of my life experience reveals and conceals itself in interesting and unexpected ways. i think, in retrospect, that i was somewhat oblivious to the physical trauma of being hit by a car in the weeks and months that followed. instead, i remember somewhat eagerly re-telling anyone who was interested, that in the process of the collision – the time between the impact and the time i landed on the pavement, “my life flashed before my eyes.” months after the accident, a hermeneutic mentor encouraged me to write about that experience, but it is only now, after several years have passed, that i attempt to ascribe meaning to that strange phenomena. i ask myself why it has taken so long. i suspect that it had to do with waiting until i had a sense of how to approach the experience. it has taken time to feel ready, but i am now prepared to employ selected tenets of hermeneutic thought to guide the possibility for deepened understanding. elements of time, awareness of time, and personal readiness associated with the healing character of time, emerge in the exploration. i am aware, as i use the phrase “i saw my life flashing before my eyes,” that many others have experienced what i did, since that phrase is not one that i constructed. i borrow the phrase, because it is a way that others have described the “reality-defying” event of having life and time manifest in another realm. it was almost as if a form of time travel occurred during the experience i am about to describe. certainly, the depth of thought that occurred, and the images that appeared for me in those few seconds that made up the event, defy notions of linear time, “real time,” and the workings of the clock. some context of the incident is important. my husband and i were visiting the city of my childhood home on the rather somber occasion of having a final family reunion with my elderly mother, who had been diagnosed with a terminal illness. my three children were all students at distant universities and we had arranged for them to fly to see their grandmother for the last time. as i crossed the street on that auspicious day, i had just visited my mother in hospital, and was about to greet my daughter who was arriving from the airport. she was to meet me at the hotel that was just across the street from the hospital. the accident i remember waiting for the light to turn green. there were a number of people waiting with me on this busy downtown street, replete with six lanes of traffic to traverse. when the light turned, i stepped onto the pavement, walking briskly in anticipation of seeing my daughter, and glancing to the right towards the hotel, attempting to catch sight of her arrival. behind me, at that moment, i heard the forever-anonymous male voice yell, “hey!” interestingly, the memory of his warning did not arise in my recollection until weeks later. that detail, which was not initially accessible, wormed its way back into my recollection after some time had passed. but warn me, he did, although it was clearly too late, for immediately, the impact of the car, coming from the left, assaulted my being with a totality, and an intensity that remains difficult to articulate. the experience of a car crashing into my body was an overwhelming sense of defenselessness and resignation that permeated my being. i experienced an embodied understanding of the body’s fragility – of my body’s fragility in a moment in the history of the universe –and i felt an humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 1 3 association with some kind of existential “mocking.” it was as if a voice was reminding me of my hubris, and the inevitability of the end of existence. there was an urgent moment of reckoning with…my creator? the universe? the fates? so formidable was the impact that i succumbed immediately to the inevitability of the event. i do not remember the pain of the collision as much as i remember the acknowledgement that this would be the occasion of the end of my life. i saw, in that instant, the experience of my life, almost as if it were displayed on a multi-dimensional collage before me. the near-death experience i had as a young child in a drowning accident scripts my earliest memory. in the moment of impact, i mused about the “stolen” nature of my life, since that childhood tragedy shaped a worldview that i later associated with “survivor guilt.” in the moment of impact, my thoughts went to that occasion, the marker of my beginnings. the next thoughts were for my children, gathered on the occasion of a family farewell to a beloved grandparent. but i saw them as the children that i had raised, not only the vision of young adults that permeated the occasion of our reunion. their childhood essences were part of my projection, and their lives, too, presented themselves as beings that i knew as infants, children, and now adults. i grieved for them, for they would be incredulous at my death, and i lamented that the unexpected nature of the accident would traumatize them for the rest of their adult lives. i thought of my husband, ever cautious and careful, who would be frustrated that i did not see the car coming, and look to reasons as to why this accident occurred and why it should not have. i pictured my dear mother, lying in her hospital bed such a short distance away, in the hospital where i was born. i could have seen, had i been able to focus, the room of my birth, the site of the old case room. i had always known where to spot the room at the hospital where i was born, and in this suspended instant, i visualized the ironic cycle that comprised of both the beginning and the end of my life in perfect circuitous proximity. i pictured my mother’s bewilderment, and her thoughts for my entire family, robbed of their mother/spouse/sister. mom would be sad to have a child’s death precede her own. i knew, too, that she would reconcile the event as god’s will and prepare to greet me in the afterlife. there was a flash of personal disappointment, too, for my untimely demise would mean a lost opportunity to begin my doctoral work, since i had just learned that my application to begin a phd had been accepted. i remember the irritation of contemplating a project left unfinished. while all of these thoughts whirled through my head i was only dispassionately aware of what was happening to my body in the physical world. bursts of visual images accompanied the assault, including a peek at the driver– a terrified looking girl at the wheel, her face displaying the shock and horror of what had transpired because of her distraction. i sensed the feeling of flying through the air, seeing my life, and my body, from a distanced perspective, and i marveled at the random nature of my departure. then, there was communion with the ground. i glimpsed the undercarriage of the car, and the knowledge that i would now be run over. it was at that moment that i mourned the loss of my life, and the absurdity that it would be this way that my life should end. from start to finish, this event could not have lasted more than three or four seconds, and yet, i know with curious assurance that the thoughts i described occurred with the acuity that i recount. it was as if my life flashed before my eyes in those few seconds, uncovering more than would humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 1 4 ever be possible in real time, but parading before me, nonetheless, with surprising depth and complexity. by way of completing my story, i was, in the end, not run over. i had landed on the pavement, on my side, in time for the driver to stop. at that point, there was a deadening and confusing silence for what seemed, again, to defy notions of time. i lay on the pavement waiting for someone to say: “call an ambulance.” instead, after what seemed to be an interminable period of inaction, i heard a fragile voice from afar repeating over and over “are you ok? are you ok?” i imagine, in retrospect, that it was the voice of the young driver. the trauma in her voice, in my recollection, was palpable. i was unable to respond since the pain associated with the accident had now announced itself with unquestionable authority. still i waited for someone to say, “call an ambulance.” and still, there was no move to do so. from the distance, i heard a voice say, “turn her over.” the de-humanizing reference to “her” was not lost on me, since i longed for someone to approach me, the person on the pavement in that place and time, hold my hand, and offer connection. instead, i croaked “no, leave me be. i shouldn’t be moved.” i had processing to do, lying on the pavement. for one thing, i had to find a way to cope with the worst pain i have ever experienced. more importantly, though, i can also honestly confess, that in addition to dealing with the searing pain, i indulged in the need to savor the incredible gift i had been given. part of me was positively giddy at the realization that for the second time since the drowning accident that signified the beginning of my memories, i had narrowly escaped, on this day, the end of all memories. i knew that whatever injuries i had sustained would pale against the alternative possibility of the death that i had accepted as my fate, only seconds ago. had it all occurred in a far-off realm, in a parallel universe, where time takes on an alien dimension? the simultaneous experience of overwhelming pain and glorious giddiness are an interesting pairing to contemplate, but it was my reality as i lay on the pavement, musing about the fleeting nature of existence, and the reprieve from the inevitable that had blessed me on that day. after what seemed to be a ten-minute lapse, but which was likely under a minute, i heard someone finally say, “we’d better call an ambulance.” after what seemed to be a thirty-minute wait, but which was likely only five minutes, the ambulance arrived. hermeneutics and time “how did it get so late so soon?” ― dr. seuss why is it important to explore my alien experience of time, which appeared at a critical juncture of my life, and presented as an unrecognizable and unsettling perception? grondin (2003) asked “can the interpretative-the hermeneutic-really be overcome?” (p. 12). his question is thought provoking, for it implies that interpretation occupies a very basic aspect of our human approach to understanding, and in my case, the desire to understand meanings associated with my strange experience of time. heideggerian language suggests that in the fullness of dasein – our existence we are unable to avoid interpreting the facticity into which we are “thrown” in the world-thatis-already-there. in other words, the everyday realities of our circumstances will always provide the backdrop for our inevitable interpretations. https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/61105.dr_seuss humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 1 5 the alternate experience of time has the potential to disrupt the security of our everydayness, and beckons an attempt to rationalize, or “scientificize” the disquiet. what scientific explanation might there be for such an uncommon experience of time? did i hit my head and not know it? did i dream it? have i embellished the memory over time? heidegger decries the yearning to ascribe universal truths to metaphysical questions. in fact, heidegger’s being and time (originally published in 1927) had, as its central impetus, a desire to “alert us to the radical temporality of all being and destroy all illusions about supratemporal permanence” (grondin, 2003, p. 2). the centrality of heidegger’s message stemmed from a desire to launch philosophical thought away from the attempt to create universal solutions for unsolved metaphysical problems (grondin, 2003; sherratt, 2006). the unlikeliness of finding a scientific “explanation” for the mysteries associated with time passing, therefore, are remote, and perhaps address grondin’s query as to whether the interpretative can be “overcome.” would it be possible for me to overcome the temptation to interpret, in scientific or other contexts, what it meant to glimpse a foreign dimension of time? would it be possible for me to dismiss the event without ongoing contemplation about its peculiarity? the influence of the event on my life, and my attempt to interpret meaning in this writing, suggests that i cannot. i am drawn to heideggerian and gadamerian explications of time, wherein there is a suggestion that time does not exist in a linear or chronological way, but rather in an “altogether” way, where dimensions of time present as one. heidegger (1927/2010) stated: “in the everyday ‘just passing through life’ that takes care, dasein never understands itself as running along in a continuously enduring succession of sheer ‘nows’” (p. 390). in that statement, heidegger emphasized that dasein accepts all temporal interpretations, but embraces them in the fullness of existence. it seems, then, there is more to understand than the “succession of nows” such as the listing of events or the cataloguing of statistics. instead, the promise for hermeneutic interpretation is to rest and pause, allowing the meaning to come into view. it is possible to understand being, then, as comprising, in each moment, our past, present, and future. heidegger (1927/2010) extended that conceptualization by asking, “does time itself reveal itself as the horizon of being?” (p. 415, author’s italics). heidegger’s question draws attention to the intractable relationship between being and time, and reveals with succinct luminescence, the vision of our existence as experienced by time. heidegger also hinted at the impossibility of conceptualizing time as a linear framework, by suggesting: initially, time presents itself as an uninterrupted succession of nows. every now is already either a just now or a right-away. if the characterization of time keeps primarily and exclusively to this succession, then, in principle, no beginning and end can be found in it as such. every last now, as a now, is always already a right-away that is no longer, thus it is time in the sense of the no-longer-now, of the past. every first now is always a just-now-not –yet, thus it is time in the sense of the not-yet-now, the ‘future.’ time is thus endless ‘in both directions.’ (p. 403, author’s italics, author’s quotation marks) the notion of one’s life, as part of the “history of the universe,” might therefore be understood in a way that defies grandiose connotations associated with such a statement, but rather, alludes to the infinite characterization of time, made manifest in the context of our existence, and our being. humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 1 6 the notion of life “flashing” before our eyes, summons a certain alignment with the “flash” of hermeneutic understanding to which caputo (1987) referred, when he described the lighteninglike occasion of understanding. blattner (2006), too, referenced the “altogether” gasp of recognition-the fusion of horizonsthat accompanies understanding and meaning. there is familiarity with those notions, and it is possible to reflect on what happens when we interpret a flash of insight into the course of everyday navigations. the prospect is also elusive, since an altogether gasp of understanding can be hard won. it seems that, in the use of the word “flash,” there are implications of immediacy. furthermore, in all hermeneutic conceptualizations of existence (dasein) there are existential implications regarding heidegger’s suggestions of human finitude. understandings of finitude underscore the meaning of the “flash,” which is always experienced in the context of our finite existence. the flash can be understood, too, by uncovering dimensions that transcend the limitations of linear assumptions of starts and finishes, timelines, and other familiar conceptions of time passing. a multidimensional “mind map” thus replaces the vision of a “roadmap” in my conceptualizations. deliberation the meaning of my reflection about the accident then, is not at all clear, but this insight fits well with the general incentive of hermeneutic reflection. in other words, my exploration need not be an impulse to reconcile, or to experience closure about this mysterious occurrence of time, nor is it an impulse to solve metaphysical queries that i distil into the question: how can time be experienced, in the everyday, with such variation, given the finite and static ticking of a clock that marks its passage? caputo (1987) reminds us, “the point is to make life difficult, not impossible – to face up to the difference and difficulty which enter into what we think and do and hope for not to grind them to a halt” (p. 7). it seems, then, that there is purpose in dwelling in the difficult questions that encompass our human passage through life, including the invitation to remain open to the mysteries that elude place and time. notably, the process of hermeneutic interpretation, and the skill embedded in that process, must not amount to abstract theorizing (crotty, 2010; laverty, 2003). as gadamer (1976/2004) stated: “for the interpreter to let himself be guided by the things themselves is obviously not a matter of a single, ‘conscientious’ decision, but is ‘the first, last, and constant task’” (p. 269). husserl’s plea to remain focused on “the things themselves” (the lived experience as opposed to theoretical abstraction) supports heidegger’s proposition that our lives are intelligible only through the interpretation of the everyday (dreyfus, 1992). to repeat, the notion of dasein invites a view of existence that is finite, but non-linear. the possibilities for understanding such an idea include seeing the “now” as a composite of experience. understanding time by invoking heidegger’s attention to finitude, historical situatedness, and a sense of “running toward death” (caputo, 1989; grondin, 2003), as well as heidegger’s tragic conception of dasein, serve as a “penetrating glimpse into the radical temporality and angst of human existence” (grondin, 2003, p. 145). these are ideas that capture a perspective of time that resonates with the experience of seeing one’s life flash before one’s eyes, for in those moments, the race towards death appears comprehensible. as such, inexplicable presentations of time serve as lived examples of the perception of time that humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 1 7 heidegger explored. they are but a glimpse, however, and punctuate dasein infrequently, creating, perhaps the temptation to explain, interpret, and understand them when they arise. the precipice of understanding i believe the experience, and the recollection of it, uncovered a space for me to consider other time-related understandings of dasein, relating to my everyday nursing practice. hermeneutic scholar and philosopher, dr. walter brogan, suggested that living on the threshold – being always open to possibility is a position that reflects the need for careful contemplation, in order to savor the dialogical space that defines the threshold. this liminal space, in turn, creates a precipice for infinite contemplation about meaning (dr. walter brogan, personal communication, june 9, 2017). for example, while practicing nursing in the clinical setting, i can recall countless episodes where the issue of time, in people’s experiences, created dimensions of disquiet. persons waking from a general anesthetic will “lose” awareness of the several hours that passed during the surgery, and may worriedly perceive that they are waking before the surgery has begun, or that they are awakening during the surgery. in another recovery-room experience, i recall the poignancy of a woman waking from her anesthetic with tears streaming down her face. in the course of her short anesthetized procedure, she had “seen” and visited extensively with her deceased son. the assurance that she held about the reality of the encounter left us both altered. it seems that many new mothers, when clutching their newborns for the first time, are engaging in a trajectory of that infants’ existence, as though their child’s life is unfolding before them in those first instants, rife with imaginings and projections of what the child’s existence will entail. these, and so many other varietal perceptions of time, whether time accelerates, grinds, or is altogether “missing,” are part of the human health and healing experience, so much so, that the mysteries may appear as commonplace to health care providers, who become familiar with the phenomenon as everyday observations. however, individuals who have experienced the wonder of life flashing before their eyes, or lose time, or find themselves relegated to another place where time takes on a different meaning, may be disquieted, and struggle to reconcile an inexplicable experience. the tendency for caregivers may be to theorize about patients’ agonizing experience of the slow passage of time, and search for scientific explanations about such metaphysical wonderings. in the moments that i awaited the ambulance, for example, the torment of enduring time reflected an experience of time that alternated, again, from the cornucopia of images that were compressed into the preceding moment. i continue to muse about the contrasting projections of time that accompanied the entire experience. nurse scholars have considered the meaning of time in the context of the human health experience. for example, nursing theorist rosemary parse’s theory of human becoming served as a framework to explore the phenomena of time passing (thoun, 2002). thoun pointed to the advantage of seeing time as a “unitary” phenomenon, in contrast with “newtonian” visions of time, around which time is viewed as objective, linear, and continuous. thoun suggested: the newtonian notion of time subverts the phenomenology of lived experience and quality of life. nurses who strive for understanding of lived experiences and loving humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 1 8 participation with others in practice are uniquely positioned to provide an opportunity for release from the restrictions of linear time. while each person defines and lives time passing in her or his own way, the awe and wonder of rhythmic, unitary time offers the possibility of experience that is rich with process and possibility, mystery and surprise. (p. 318) with these words, thoun (2002) locates possibilities for nursing practice within a “unitary” vision of time, aligning with heideggerian notions, wherein time transcends the series of “nows” and assumes understandings of time as contingent on a particular conception of human existence, wherein existential meaning is possible in each moment of interaction. there are, therefore, fascinating possibilities for each participant, in each moment, in the context of the health-caring experience. the attempt to articulate phenomena of time, using the conventional descriptions of past, present, and future, are limiting, and summon a frontier wherein alternative expectations of time can present as a way to enrich human health encounters. thoun emphasized that nurses enjoy considerable opportunity to release the restrictions of linear time, in the context of the health and healing experience. however, caputo (1987) cautioned: finally, we come up against the mystery itself, the unencompassable depth in both things and our (non)selves. and then we are brought up short. that, it seems to me, is where hermeneutics leads us: not to a conclusion which gives comfort, but to a thunderstorm, not to a closure, but to a dis-closure, and openness toward what cannot be encompassed, where we lose our breath and are stopped in our tracks, at least momentarily, for it always belongs to our condition to remain on the way. (p. 214) there are, therefore, few comforting strategies or practicalities associated with the work of contemplating the mysteries of time, but rather a commitment to remain, as caputo (1987) described, “on the way” to infinite interpretations and possibilities. it bears echoing that the expression of “life flashing before my eyes,” has a tradition of understanding from others in countless other contexts. recognizing the expression of a life flashing before one’s eyes is therefore familiar in our consciousness as a possibility that awaits for meaning to come into view. indeed, the promise for hermeneutic interpretation is to rest and pause. i remain on the precipice of understanding, knowing that this extraordinary experience is embedded in my historicity, my tradition, and occupies the status of remaining, always, “on the way.” connecting with the everyday in the following poem, tolkien (1954/2001, pp. 83-84) touches on the multiplicity of time, and the perspective of “self” in the context of time. self becomes the mediator of time spent; conjuring memories that relive the deep comfort that can permeate the everyday. in those moments, there is a suggestion that notions of past, present, and future conjoin – that one can contemplate the historic while simultaneously anticipating future contentment. an interesting insight looms. as was the case for me during those few seconds following the impact of the car, the voice of the fireside philosopher in the poem below contemplates the end of his existence with curious acceptance in the midst of concurrent deliberations, capturing with simplistic humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 1 9 elegance, the existential character of our perceptions. the poet celebrates the textures of life by referencing past, present, and future, as well as the inevitability of death, and hints at the possibilities for perceiving the simultaneity of time. i sit beside the fire and think of all that i have seen of meadow flowers and butterflies in summers that have been of yellow leaves and gossamer in autumns that there were with morning mist and silver sun and wind upon my hair i sit beside the fire and think of how the world will be when winter comes without a spring that i shall ever see for still there are so many things that i have never seen in every wood in every spring there is a different green i sit beside the fire and think of people long ago and people that will see a world that i shall never know but all the while i sit and think of times there were before i listen for returning feet and voices at the door ― j.r.r. tolkien (fellowship of the ring) what mysteries accompany the seasons of our existence, and how easily these exquisite moments of deep existential awareness are subsumed by the machinations of the everyday! such is the stuff of hermeneutic notions of aletheia, wherein emerging meaning surfaces at unexpected junctures, only to recede again, when the everydayness of life assumes its stature. aletheia, or the event of revealing and concealing (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2014), presents rhythmic companionship to discovery that may surface, disappear, and become replaced by something new. heidegger (1927/2010) hinted at the elusive nature of discovery by saying: this nearest and elemental way of dasein encountering the world goes so far that even one’s own dasein initially becomes ‘discoverable’ by looking away from its ‘experiences’ https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/656983.j_r_r_tolkien humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 1 10 and the ‘center of its actions’ or by not yet ‘seeing’ them at all. (p. 116, author’s italics, author’s quotation marks) i return, always, to the gift that accompanied my unusual experience. by looking away from rationality, and linear notions of time and existence during those few seconds when my life flashed before my eyes, i am able to glimpse the unexpected and unplanned profundity of encountering cherished individuals, meaningful life events, hopes, dreams, and disappointments. the experience will undoubtedly alter the way i conceive my existence for the rest of my days. however, i am not served with a conclusive offering. rather, evolving understanding is contingent on ongoing unrest, as well as enduring openness, about the mystery that accompanies a foray into an unfamiliar dimension, and an enigmatic human experience of time. references blattner, w. (2006). heidegger's being and time (1st ed.). new york, ny: continuum international publishing group. caputo, j.d. (1987). radical hermeneutics: repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project (1st ed.). bloomington, in: indiana university press. crotty, m. (2010). the foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process (3rd ed.). london, uk: sage. dreyfus, h. (1992). division 1. being-in-the-world: a commentary on heidegger's being and time (1st ed., pp. 1-9). cambridge, ma, london, uk: the mit press. grondin, j. (2003). hans-georg gadamer: a biography (joel weinsheimer, trans., 1st ed.). new haven, ct: yale university press. heidegger, m. (1927/2010). being and time (e. stambagh trans.). albany, ny: suny. laverty, s. (2003). hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. international journal of qualitative methods, 2(3), 1-29. retrieved january 7, 2018 from https://sites.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/2_3final/pdf/laverty.pdf moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. sherratt, y. (2006). continental philosophy of social science (1st ed.). new york, ny: cambridge university press. tolkien, j. r. r. (1954/2001). the ring goes south. in the lord of the rings. the fellowship of the ring: book two (3rd ed., pp. 83-84). new york, ny: harpercollins. https://sites.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/2_3final/pdf/laverty.pdf humphries journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 1 11 thoun, d. (2002). time passing: a parse research method study. nursing science quarterly, 15(4), 318-326. doi: 10.1177/089431802236797 corresponding author: david w jardine, phd retired, university of calgary email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics april 16, 2018 the author(s) 2018 “asleep in my sunshine chair” david w. jardine abstract this paper takes up themes from kevin aho's (2018) paper and links its explorations of the history of neurasthenia to the nature and aim of hermeneutic inquiry itself. keywords neurasthenia, hermeneutic method, hermeneutic topics, aletheia, energeia ("aliveness"), depression, naturalistic reductionism rifling through two-hundred-year-old diaries, unfurling bundles of love-letters like flowers, saying every name in an orphanage registry under my breath, getting lost in a farmer’s field, gingerly lifting leaves long folded with perfumey motes, falling asleep in my sunshine chair, drooling spittle puddles onto a crackled map of nunsmoor. the stories i stumbled across in the archives were often painful, shocking, and occasionally joyous. at first, they seem far away but after a short while they begin to move closer (or maybe it’s we who are moving?) and i begin to comprehend, just barely, a great aliveness. (dawson, 2013/2015) “the joy of recognition” kevin aho’s (2018) “neurasthenia revisited: on medically unexplained syndromes and the value of hermeneutic medicine,” was a real pleasure to read – that odd scholarly pleasure of not only delicious and meticulous detail, but, with this, feeling folds of intimate, unspoken inheritances peeling back and away, almost from the inside out. “the joy of recognition is the jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 7 2 joy of knowing more than is already familiar” (gadamer, 1989, p. 114) while, in the same breath, experiencing the familiar now almost-embarrassingly brought to life, enlivened, by this “more.” that this particular inheritance of neurasthenia can wake up and i can feel how it has always already “draw[n me] into its path” (gadamer, 2007, p. 198) is both startling and humiliating. it “begin[s] to move closer” and then suddenly jumps up, animate and feral and afoot. i wake with a start from my sunshine chair. that i’ve been long familiar with what is wonderfully called in old english grevoushede makes reading about “the deficiency or exhaustion of . . . ‘nerve force’” (aho, 2018, p. 1) a bit like reading an historically detailed, almost-autobiographical reading of how my own life might have already been lived “beyond my wanting and doing” (gadamer, 1989, p. xxviii). darning needles i’ve just been writing another piece and exploring, in part, an old term used by my grandmother to name dragonflies: “darning needles.” this, in fact, originates in old, shall we say, “folktales” meant, i expect, to simply frighten or reprimand: the devil’s darning needles . . . sew up the mouths of scolding women, saucy children, and profane men. even more sinister is the belief that the devil’s darning needle will enter a person’s ear and penetrate the brain. (mitchell & lasswell, 2005, p. 20) the reference to dragonflies and darning has to do with their hovering, criss-cross, back and forth movement over open fields like the darning of the toes of socks that i’m old enough to recall my grandmother hunched over. weaving. latin textus, now re-read in reverie. “dragonflies” was, for me as a child (and lingering since), enough of a name to keep me rather alert. something about silent, hovering needles, though, was a different matter. the point was received as a boy even though the folktale history was never mentioned and probably not even explicitly known, even though it haunted the tale being told. reading about it recently wasn’t exactly a surprise, and yet it was. the joy of knowing more. i mention this because of the nebulous ways in which the images and ancestries and mixed and muddled language of the life-world, as kevin aho demonstrates, find their way down to us, more often than not, apparently (but not actually) untethered from the links that bore them here. hence the work of hermeneutics. many of us might have obscure memories of our forbearers talking about delicate or weak nervous conditions, of “the miseries” or the like, or, as my wife’s grandmother called one malady “weakness in the body” -full of that now-strange, victorian distancing and repression. there is even an old, apocryphal joke/non-joke about victorians covering up bare table legs with linens for fear of offense (the guardian, n.d.). that distancing that is caught in the objectifying phrase “the body” is itself a mixed and muddled sign of a sort of nervous exhaustion the remembering of which moves it closer and enlivens. reading aho’s piece also reminded me a bit of reading alice miller’s for your own good (1989), and discovering already-all-too-familiar images of the punishing of willful (“saucy”) jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 7 3 children – breaking their will, darning up their mouths -found in late-19th century “black pedagogy” manuals: it goes without saying that pedagogues not infrequently awaken and help to swell a child’s conceit by foolishly emphasizing his merits. only humiliation can help here. (from the encyclopedia of pedagogy, 1851, as cited in miller, 1989, p. 22) one of the vile products of a misguided philanthropy is the idea that, in order to obey gladly, the child has to understand the reasons why an order is given, and that blind obedience offends human dignity. i do not know how we can continue to speak of obedience once reasons are given. these [reasons] are meant to convince the child, and, once convinced, he is not obeying us but merely the reasons we have given him. respect. . .is then replaced by a self-satisfied allegiance to his own cleverness. (the encyclopedia of pedagogy, 1852, as cited in miller, 1989, p. 40) this would have been the imaginal atmosphere in which my grandmother was raised and taught and thereby my parents and thereby, well, here we are. in the work i have done in schools, these images are both repressed and rife even though we think of ourselves in education as encouraging precisely aliveness, independence, and thoughtfulness. a link lingers here of regarding a fear of the wild, and the need to domesticate, to tame and tether. bubbling nearby this, of course, are the root fears of “aliveness” that have led to our current ecological circumstances. this sort of unravelling and explicating in aho’s work is precisely one of the goals of hermeneutic work in general. we can easily be unwittingly held fast in the binds of these ancestral tethers even though – perhaps especially when and because – they have fallen from memory, fallen from view, become sewn up and hence “unspeakable.” “insight . . . always involves an escape from something that had deceived us and held us captive” (gadamer, 1989, p. 357). it should be noted, however, that gadamer’s point is more complex than it might seem, perhaps more complex than he intended. the deception is not that what has captured us is simply false and that the work of hermeneutics is to disprove something. the deception is that what has captured us in nets of numbing familiarity and goes-without-saying-ness is ontologically reified into what is presumed to be simply “the way things are” (aho does a nice job of exploring some of this in his explorations of “naturalism” and the nature of “scientific/biological reductionism”). it is this capture itself that is false – the amnesia-like forgetting, the sleepy taken-for-granted-ness that can lead to believing, for example, that only a biological/medical description is a description of what is. the deceit is in thinking that what is in fact a possible way of giving an account of some phenomenon is not only necessary (i.e., simply “what is,” simply “objective”) but precisely thereby exclusionary of all other ways of making sense of our suffering. that is the captivity that hermeneutic insight aims to free us from. in that freedom, biological and naturalistic accounts do not disappear in favor of “lived-experience.” rather, these very accounts finally appear as just and precisely that: accounts of our lives that arise in relations of dependent co-arising with specific and identifiable domains our language, our hopes, our jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 7 4 presumptions, our time, and in light of inherited regimes of methodology, warrant and accountability. energeia and aletheia so, in reading aho’s lovely piece, something popped up that i have found to be perennial in hermeneutic work: that the topic of a hermeneutic study (in this case, the long and involved, livewire history of neurasthenia), and something about the nature of hermeneutic understanding itself tend to have an often-secret affinity. i can only sketch some speculative ideas here, and beg forgiveness in this regard. i am on the verge of being guilty of avoiding precisely the sort of exemplary and careful work found in kevin aho’s work that led me here in the first place. one of the threads of hermeneutic insight is that human consciousness tends towards a certain sleepiness and lethargy regarding the ancestral currents that “bear us forward in their fine, accurate arms” (wallace, 1989, p. 49). lethargy, lethe, forgetfulness, lethality. a certain “weakness” (greek, astheneia) and heaviness and blandness and flatness and closure, where potentiality, possibility, interpretability, questioning, and venture, seem not only too exhausting to contemplate but, worse yet, simply uncalled-for in light of what moribundly “is.” it was martin heidegger (1962) who first gave contemporary hermeneutics hints of the numbing effects of what he called “idle talk,” (p. 211 ff.) “levelling down” (p. 127) and the stitched-up-mouths effects of the “it goes without saying” and “everybody knows” familiarities that come from the sways of the “they-self” (p. 163 ff.; see jardine, 2018). in light of such interpretive weakness and weakening, the world itself seems precisely equally not in need of my own interpretive energetics. as with depression, this is not merely an internal pathology or state, but is experienced as precisely in sync with a depressed world that has no openings, no hidden bloodlines and memory. as james hillman (2006, p. 30; see jardine, 2016) put it so deftly, “sickness is now ‘out there’” and any attempts to then simply turn “inwards” and cure ourselves of our grievousness can end up leaving in place an objectified codification of our suffering in the ways and means of the world itself. differently put, and following george m. beard’s (1881, p. vi), insights, “neurasthenia is not the result of some new organic pathology but of ‘modern civilization [itself]’” (aho, 2018, p. 2). so, when we then read “neurasthenia revisited: on medically unexplained syndromes and the value of hermeneutic medicine” we can start to sense that those very closures (of our own pathology and the closure that the world itself invites and promotes and sustains) are themselves open to interpretation, and to the slow unwinding of ancestral threads, of live bloodlines, of movement instead of “sedimented” intransigency and inertness: to use the hermeneutic adage, the world has become open to interpretation [to exactly the extent that i am open to the interpretability of the world]. and here is the great, seemingly paradoxical situation: “keeping ourselves open” and "keeping the world open" (eliade, 1968, p. 139) are the same thing. as we become experienced, having cleaved with affection and made ourselves “roomier,” the world's roominess can be experienced. (jardine, bastock, george, & martin, 2008, p. 53; cited in jardine, 2016a, p. 81) jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 7 5 even the insistent reductionism of naturalism is itself an old wives’ tale oft told and re-told, often precisely as a condescending rebuke to the sauciness, the scolding, the profanity, that can seem to come with hermeneutic insight. and hence the great irony, that the opening of such burgeoning alertness regarding neurasthenia is precisely what tends to fail under the shadowed suffering of neurasthenia itself. that is why, in reading kevin aho’s piece, i found myself searching out this: i take a different approach to the question of what truth, aletheia, or unconcealment, really means. i invoke the concept of energeia here, which has a special value because in dealing with it we are no longer moving in the realm of sentence truth [to which reductionist and naturalistic means and measures might apply]. with this new conceptual word aristotle was able to think a motion [a movement, motility, animation] . . . something like life itself, like being aware, seeing, or thinking. all of these he called “pure energeia.” (gadamer, 2007, p. 213) in an alternate translation, sheila ross (2006, p. 108) renders part of this passage as “something like aliveness itself” and she links it directly to the sort of whiling or “tarrying time” (p. 108; see jardine, 2008; ross & jardine, 2009) requisite of interpretive work. as aho’s piece shows, lingering intently over this long and long-buried history with the sort of loving suspicion of interpretive insight wakes it up and simultaneously wakes up in us our deeply suppressed complicity in its wakes. “it is only through these shared self-interpretations that we can experience and make sense of our suffering” (aho, 2018, p. 12) and, i suggest, this very “making sense” is itself something of an alleviation of precisely that which it studies. it is not just that we can counterweight the reductionist and naturalistic accounts of our ennui with those of living accounts of those living with such matters. in interpretive work, as aho’s piece demonstrates so vividly, those very reductionist and naturalistic accounts themselves come alive. they are not just the inert, dominant accounts of “what is.” instead, we see that they themselves have dependently co-arisen out of (and into) our living, in response to circumstances and streams and forces and hopes and desires. “they begin to move closer,” just as we, now, are moving. reifying reductionism into feigns and sought-for objective permanence is thus foregone in favor of arising and perishing, since even our confidence in and need for such reification comes and goes. “gadamer explains [that] aristotle apparently coined [energiea] in his exploration of the question of the being of becoming” (ross, 2006, p. 107). suffering itself is impermanent as you continually experience whatever suffering is appropriate to you, you absolutely must know how to bring it into the path. if you accept the suffering, you let the basic suffering be and do not stop it, but you never have the suffering of worry that creates discontentment when you focus on the basic suffer. since you are using a method to bring even basic sufferings into the path, you greatly lessen your suffering, so you can bear it. (tsong-kha-pa, 2004, pp. 172-173) jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 7 6 the energeia that comes from the interpretive venture is not just a way to study one’s grevoushede through studying the dependent co-arising of its ins and outs and the intimate body auras of its licks and shifts and criss-crossing darts and darnings. interpreting it can also help ameliorate it to some small degree. even my own decision to not use the phrase “seasonal affective disorder” and to come to deliberately call it, instead, “seasonal affectedness” allowed me, in some small way, to side-step or at least deliberately and consciously interrupt the pathologies of disorder and to more deeply experience how profoundly well-ordered is this seasonal affectedness. “disorder” was simply an added layer of, following tsong-kha-pa, a sort of “secondary suffering” that, in fact, masked and occluded the “basic suffering” and did not allow it to be brought onto the path of interpretation, the path, that is, of un-reifying its grip on me and my grip on it. key to hermeneutic work, then, is that “the concept of substance [permanence, the a=a of objectivism and reductionism] is . . .inadequate. [there is a] radical challenge to thought implicit in this inadequacy” gadamer (1989, p. 242). part of the challenge to thought is that grief and suffering themselves, like depression or nervous exhaustion, have no substance. from robert bly (n.d., p. 11): “grief is not a permanent state; it is a room with a door on the other wall.” our relation to grief is an “infinite task” (george, 2017) taken on by a finite being. but this is not because grief is permanent but precisely because it isn’t. it is, rather, perennial, seasonal in its affectedness. go through the door on the other wall and, sure enough, another waiting room in which things will once again accrete, forgetting will again accrue, and then, also sure enough, coyote will rustle in the bushes outside (see beamer, 2017) and the whole thing, all over again, will jump up unexpectedly when something just happens to happen, slobbering spittle on your face and then biting down hard and fast into the quick of memory. welcome. again. this is the tough work of hermeneutic insight: the first noble truth is all about accepting or welcoming unsatisfactoriness or suffering (dukkha) rather than trying to resist it. you will notice then that its nature is to change and drop away. (sumedho, 2010, p. 37) it drops away, arises, drops away, providing we remain, as steadfastly as we can, ready to escape its capture all over again. so, don’t sit too long in that sunshine chair. you’re apt to fall, like me so very often, again and again, into asleep and spittle drooling, only to be startled all over again. references aho, k. (2018). neurastenia revisited: on medically unexplained syndromes and the value of hermeneutic medicine. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 6. retrieved from https://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/174/pdf jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 7 7 beamer, k. (2017). and coyote howled: listening to the call of interpretive inquiry. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 10. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5n010b1 beard, g. (1881). american nervousness, its causes and consequences: a supplement to nervous exhaustion (neurasthenia). new york, ny: g. p. putnam’s sons. bly, r. (n.d.). when a hair turns to gold. st. paul, mn: ally press. dawson, r. (2013/2015). from the liner notes to his cd the glass trunk. domino records, rewigcd95. eliade, m. (1968). myth and reality. new york, ny: harper & row. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method. new york, ny: continuum books. gadamer, h-g. (2007). the artwork in word and image: “so true, so full of being.” in h-g. gadamer, the gadamer reader: a bouquet of later writings. (r. palmer, trans. and ed.; pp. 195224). evanston, il: northwestern university press. george, t. (2017). grieving as limit situation of memory: gadamer, beamer, and moules on the infinite task posed by the dead. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 11. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/163 heidegger, m. (1927/1962). being and time. new york, ny: harper and row. hillman, j. (2006). anima mundi: returning the soul to the world. in j. hillman (2006), city and soul (pp. 27-49). putnam, ct: spring publications. jardine, d. (2008). on the while of things. journal of the american association for the advancement of curriculum studies, (4), 1-15. february 2008. on-line: http://www.uwstout.edu/soe/jaaacs/vol4/jardine.htm jardine, d. (2016). “sickness is now ‘out there.’” in d. jardine (2016), in praise of radiant beings: a retrospective path through education, buddhism and ecology (pp. 167-172). charlotte, nc: information age publishing. jardine, d. (2016a). “subjectivity is a distorting mirror.” in d. jardine (2016), in praise of radiant beings: a retrospective path through education, buddhism and ecology (pp. 79-82). charlotte, nc: information age publishing. jardine, d. (2018). two tics. on-line: https://www.academia.edu/36311315/two_tics.pdf jardine, d., bastock, m., george, j., & martin, j. (2008). “cleaving with affection”: on grain elevators and the cultivation of memory. in d. jardine, p. clifford, & s. friesen (eds.), back to http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5n010b1  http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/163 http://www.uwstout.edu/soe/jaaacs/vol4/jardine.htm https://www.academia.edu/36311315/two_tics.pdf jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 7 8 the basics of teaching and learning: "thinking the world together" (2nd ed.; pp. 11-58). new york, ny: routledge. miller, a. (2002). for your own good: hidden cruelty in child-rearing and the roots of violence. toronto, on, canada: farrar, straus and giroux. mitchell, f., & lasswell, j. (2005). a dazzle of dragonflies. college station, tx: texas a&m university press. ross, s.m. (2006). the temporality of tarrying in gadamer. theory, culture & society, 23(1), 101–123. ross, s.m., & jardine, d. (2009). won by a certain labour: a conversation on the while of things. journal of the american association for the advancement of curriculum studies, 5(1), 1-33. on-line: http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/jaaacs/article/view/187678/185780 sumedho, a. (2010). don’t take your life personally. totnes, devon, uk: buddhist publishing group. tsong-kha-pa, (2004). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (lam rim chen mo). vol. 2. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. the guardian. (n.d.) notes and queries. on-line: https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,,-1324,00.html wallace, b. (1987). the stubborn particulars of grace. toronto, on, canada: mcclelland and stewart. http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/jaaacs/article/view/187678/185780 https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,,-1324,00.html microsoft word jardine2final.docx corresponding author: david w. jardine email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics july 16, 2012 the author(s) 2012 the descartes lecture david w. jardine a brief foreword after the fact we ought to be like elephants in the noontime sun in summer, when they are tormented by heat and thirst and catch sight of a cool lake. they throw themselves into the water with the greatest pleasure and without a moment’s hesitation. in just the same way, for the sake of ourselves and others, we should give ourselves joyfully to the practice. kunzang pelden (b.1862, tibet) the nectar of manjushri’s speech (2007, p. 255) i felt compelled to introduce this lecture transcription with this passage because, well, it’s hilarious and true, and might serve to offset some of the necessary dourness in what follows. it really does capture something of the sheer buoyancy and joy of interpretive work, despite all its setbacks and suffering and difficulty, despite the dark shadows that sometimes surround it, and how it, necessarily and unavoidably, summons the lord of death. because these elephants, just like us, are living beasts, so, just like us, neither the torment nor the great pleasure will last forever. even so, i understand that great snorfling, that parched grey meat, hot sun and cracking skin, that trumpeting pleasure, and the coolness of that plunge. it certainly is strange, however, to read a written transcript of an extemporaneous talk whose breath has passed into thin air. i must say that, reading this, i feel a bit like a grandparent who got to drop in and get the grandkids all excited, but then gets to leave when the hard work sets in. the students in this class might have found parts of this talk arousing, amusing or inciting, but, as h.g. gadamer (1989, p. 299) said, so simply and so clearly, understanding is only just barely beginning when something addresses us and catches our attention. then, the difficult work of composing yourself and composing your thoughts, of writing, of speaking, of shaping and forming, of finding out what the ancients have taught us about the locales of our living, and making a case for the truths and falsehoods of those teachings, of now, here, in these difficult times, telling the truth about what you've witnessed--all these set in hard and fast and linger far after the thrill is gone. that elephant abandon is very attractive at first blush, but it is one great image of the dangers of the pretty, deceptive face of interpretive work. this work makes you susceptible to becoming "like the leading edge of water running downhill--you go anywhere you are led, taking anything said to be true, wantjardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 2 ing to cry when you see others crying, wanting to laugh when you see others laugh" (tsong-kha-pa [1357-1419], 2004, p. 222). no matter how long i do this work, i still can fall prey so easily to such furtiveness and distraction, a sort of floating, brainstem-storming connectionism that, in the end is simply selfindulgent, self-aggrandizing, and, frankly, cowardly. i know this too well: "using only joyous perseverance you will end up exhausted" (tsong-kha-pa, 2002, p. 62) and exhausting the patience and good will of your friends and of your work itself. practice is needed that seeks wisdom in the midst of this onrush. after the gold rush "something awakens our interest that is really what comes first!" (gadamer, 2001, p. 50)--hermeneutics faces us with the deep, scholarly question: what the hell is going on? it rears up as a path that must be followed, a lead that must be trailed, a task that must now be undertaken, of finding out, of investigating, of questioning and facing the afflictions that swirl around the topic, the topography i have chosen to travel--my own deeply personal afflictions in terrible concert with the afflictions of the world i am investigating. it comes on like a summons with my name on it, my life at stake. "do not place your hopes on sheer determination" (tsong-kha-pa, 2002, p. 62). only repeated practice will help, full of citatiousness, study, and a deepening knowledge of the ancestral lineages that we have often unwittingly inherited, that need to get committed to memory or written out and savored and read to friends and neighbors. hermeneutics, thus, involves a dedication to the careful, suspicious reading and re-reading, interpreting and re-interpreting the texts and textures of our individual and common lives and worlds. and then, in the middle of all that, hermeneutics demands that i take on the task of composing myself while composing something about this world, while writing a "hermeneutic study." "i compose this in order to condition my own mind" (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 111) and through such conditioning and composition, i always hope to provide some relief to the suffering and affliction that has spellbound me and my chosen profession. this is the unspoken vow. and this is a warning that knows no heed: once you catch sight of that water and its promise of relief, you might find that you can't turn back, that you can't undo the glimpse, that you've taken the vow without knowing it and that you're tethered to it even if you can't then fulfill what that vow demands. one common, lovely, terrifying complaint: there are signs everywhere. everywhere. how do i get it to stop? remember, then, this is not just a matter of quelling the rampaging elephant with calmness and quiet: "no matter how long you cultivate serenity, you can only suppress manifest afflictions; you cannot eradicate their seeds. you need to cultivate insight" (tsongkha-pa, 2002, p. 22). hermeneutics demands that we go through these afflictions (erfharung) and seek the aid of those who have gone before (vorfahrung) and in this, seek insight, wisdom. hermeneutic work is meant to induce and encourage others on this way. this is why it whiles and gathers and waits. this is why there is something pedagogical about it. one more corkscrew, then. after all that, hermeneutics slams us with this: there are so many things that could be said, so many possibilities, so much that could be read and learned, so much of an overwhelming cascade--everywhere! what should i do? well, welcome to grad school, that most opulent life of leisure and opportunity (latin schola, meaning "leisure," root of "scholar" and "school"). i'm reminded of how the great tsong-kha-pa (2000, pp. 117-128) berates readers for wasting this rare gift lost in the flurry of more meager things. to paraphrase jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 3 george harrison, that is not what we are here for. here, where, despite the often-gnawing circumstances that surround us, we face the question of what needs to be said here, now, right in the middle of these troubling causes and conditions: we should have no illusion. bureaucratized teaching and learning systems dominate the scene, but nevertheless it is everyone’s task to find his free space. the task of our human life in general is to find free spaces and learn to move therein. in research this means finding the question, the genuine question. you all know that as a beginner one comes to find everything questionable, for that is the privilege of youth to seek everywhere the novel and new possibilities. one then learns slowly how a large amount must be excluded in order to finally arrive at the point where one finds the truly open questions and therefore the possibilities that exist. perhaps the most noble side of the enduring independent position of the university—in political and social life—is that we with the youth and they with us learn to discover the possibilities and thereby possible ways of shaping our lives. there is this chain of generations which pass through an institution, like the university, in which teachers and students meet and lose one another. students become teachers and from the activity of the teachers grows a new teaching, a living universe, which is certainly more than something known, more than something learnable, but a place where something happens to us. i think this small academic universe still remains one of the few precursors of the grand universe of humanity, of all human beings, who must learn to create with one another new solidarities. (gadamer, 1986, p. 59) but here is the good news, and a bit of a hermeneutic secret. all that hard, scholarly, detailed, difficult work, all that effort of practice, and reading and re-reading, of struggling to understand, to open up free spaces, real possibilities of shaping our lives, where understanding might grow and compassion might last, of underlining and hunting for sources, of page numbers and names and seeking out bibliographic trace-lines, and thus slowly composing oneself while composing an interpretive work-all this ends up cultivating and deepening your ability to experience and share precisely that elephant abandon and joyousness. "[this world] compels over and over, and the better one knows it, the more compelling it is" (gadamer, 2007, p. 115). only now, we experience that joy and abandon as it really is, in the full knowledge of the flesh and its passing. hermeneutic work treats its topics like works of art that gather up our festive returns, topics that, in return for our attention and devotion, begin to glow in response to the attention we have bestowed upon them: hugh [of st. victor (1096-1141)] begins to explain what wisdom does. the sentence begins, sapientia illuminat hominem, "wisdom illuminates man" . . .ut seipsum agnoscat, "so that he may recognize himself." once again, in this rendering, translation and exegesis are in conflict, and the english words chosen could easily veil the sense that interpretation can reveal. enlightenment in hugh's world and what is understood as enlightenment now are two different things. the light, which in hugh's metaphoric usage illuminates, is the counterfoil of the eighteenth-century light of reason [a child of the cartesian lineage talked about below]. the light of which hugh speaks here brings man to a glow. approaching wisdom makes the reader radiant. the studious striving that jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 4 hugh teaches is a commitment to engage in an activity by which the reader's own "self" will be kindled and brought to sparkle. (illich, 1993, p. 17) what wonderful images and ideas. what joy to know that it will take me years, maybe more years than i have, to be equal to a text like this. this is love and affection. that texts and topics and works become more radiant and compelling the more we experience them and take care of them, until finally they start to stand there without us, "works" in whose light we are then cast. what in the world would we do if this were true? how would our lives be lived if this were a possible way of shaping ourselves? just imagine trying to seek out this sort of experience and trying to practice it. that is what hermeneutics requires of us. it requires reading as if our lives depended on it. so right here, that frankly stupid divide between scholarship and practice, between academic work and "the field" finally starts to let go of its grip. "all texts are instructions for practice" (tsong-kha-pa 2000, p. 52): it is like showing a horse the racecourse before you race. once you have shown it, you then race there. it would be ridiculous to show the horse one racecourse and then race on another. similarly, why would you determine one thing by means of study and reflection, and then, when you go to practice, practice something else? (p. 52) here's one more secret about hermeneutics. it culminates, slowly, into the insight that this world will be fine without me, and the great sense of relief that can slowly come from this insight, the great sense of setting down the panicky task of mastering things and feeling somehow essential to their continuance. that is what it means to truly understand something in the hermeneutic sense. this is part of the elephant's cool plunge. all this is cast in the shadow of my own impermanence and mortality and there is relief to be had in this insight, this admission. "take this feeling of letting go as your refuge" (chah 1987). if we were not finite, none of this wonderful, ambivalent work of loving attention and composure would be necessary. if we were not finite, none of this would be possible: that which is not split does not have to be rejoined, thus going by way of ambivalence circumvents coniunctio efforts of the ego ["a hitherto concealed experience that transcends thinking from the position of subjectivity" (gadamer, 1989, p. 100), …hermeneutic experience] because by bearing ambivalence, one is in the coniunctio itself ["the true locus of hermeneutics is this in-between." (gadamer, 1989, p. 295)]. this way works at wholeness not in halves but through wholeness from the start. the way is slower, action is hindered, and one fumbles foolishly in the half-light. this way finds echo in many familiar phrases from lao tzu, but especially: "soften the light, become one with the dusty world." (hillman 2005, p. 41) so, "cultivate love for those who have gathered to listen" (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 64), but a great part of this love means taking some care, warning, chiding, admiring, not abandoning those who are just beginning, working through what are slowly becoming known to be intimate afflictions tied to deep sources, causes and conditions, and sometimes overwhelming consequences. hermeneutics, like these buddhist sources i've been citing, is adamant about the importance of finding a teacher (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 6992) and about taking refuge in a community of others seeking to do this work (in budjardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 5 dhism, this is one of the "three jewels": community, sangha), whether these be classmates, or, for me this summer, tsong-kha-pa, my own light summer reading that i've re-read, now, seven times. again, be careful. as a teacher in tsong-kha-pa's lineage warns, watch out for that pretty face and that rushing cool lake allure: "the more intense the practice, the more intense the demons," this from patrul rinpoche (1808-1887) in his the words of my perfect teacher (patrul, 1998, p. 189). all this, of course, is why what happened next in this graduate class in the faculty of nursing where this talk was held, is the real site of all the hard, meticulous and sometimes agonizing work involved in cultivating a genuine, sustainable and livable love for those who have gathered. this, in fact, is why this text ends so abruptly, because what happened next is itself a sort of un-shareable secret. it is the time of all those small back-and-forth words, small gestures, little referentialities, silences, little ventures and retreats, looks of panic, great laughter and relief, patience, anger, and on and on, where things start to happen and gather and work. pedagogy. it is when tales of abuse, of addiction, of children dying, of overwhelming busyness, of black humor, of strokes, and family gatherings and hope and love and despair come forward into the open space, and the tough work, the real work, of building new solidarities begins. two quick words of thanks, then, to end this foreword. first my sincere thanks to shelagh mcconnell for having the great patience to transcribe this talk with great skill. you saved me the unbearable task of hearing my own voice sound like a stranger's. and second, to nancy moules who has given me so many leisurely opportunities to practice these words that still seem to come out so half-clumsy, so, well, elephantine, too often with little cool water in sight. our friendship and our shared dedication are a great comfort and a great refuge. the descartes lecture i’ve been working here in the faculty of education since 1986. the types of work that have evolved in those intervening years have been really an interesting thing to witness. i expect that all of you in different ways have seen something of this in your own professions and own ways through the world, how some sort of shift seems to be in the air or wants to be in the air-about what knowledge is, how knowledge works, who is in charge of it, what it means to demonstrate what you know, what counts, what is needed in these strange and rushing times, and so on. this has been set up in the past, as you all know, as paradigm wars or the old, exhausted quantitative/qualitative arguments and debates. the good news is: that fight is over. because part of that fight was premised on an attempt for the interpretive disciplines to demonstrate a certain legitimacy to, you know, figure out how to get "dad" to love and respect me. there was some headway made in certain quarters, and in other quarters, he just got more and more pissed off. so you know, the really interesting news after all these years for me is that interpretive work needs to be good, but it doesn’t need to demonstrate to those who don’t want to do this type of work that it should exist. if you do a statistically based study, you don't have to prove to me that statistics is a worthwhile discipline. you don’t. it’s taken for granted that, well, too bad, there it is. same with interpretive work. you don’t have to justify its very existence, even though, with some granting agencies, some tenure and promotion review boards, and some supervisory committees, this demand still arises. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 6 you know: "tell me about this 'hermeneutics.' i’ve never heard of it." oh well, okay, i guess that will be my problem….again. it’s only been around for 115 years in its contemporary version. but you know, patience is apparently a virtue, even though having always to be the patient one is a pain in the ass, but you know, anyway, this is the situation we are in, always feeling like the upstart. this isn't just an accident of circumstance, because, of course, hermes was a trickster, an annoyance who would never lie but never tell the whole truth either, a bit of a flit, a bit of a flirt. this is but one more sign of the continuing dominance of natural-scientific work, that it can always demand that other forms of work "show their papers" like at a border crossing, but it never has to show its own papers. hermes was the god of borders, but his role, much to the annoyance of the border patrols, was to keep the gates open. the type of work you’re dealing with in this interpretive research course didn’t just arrive in the world. it has an immediate legacy that goes back to 1900 and just before, maybe 1870: dilthey, schleiermacher, and so on. and it has a mediated history that goes back perennially from there to all those moments of facing the world and our peculiar lot in it, of needing to read the sacred text for some signs of how to understand our contemporary woes. midrash. part of what we all face, in this faculty and in mine, is that we live in a world in which some forms of discourse have become dominant. and we all know that natural science discourse has become powerful and predominant. and for good reason--it's so confident, so sure of itself, it has lead to such spectacular things. look, see…computer. it's actually taping my voice and will download onto a thing that you can carry in your pocket. it has found cures. and so pervades the predominance of natural science discourse, its forms of knowing, methodologies, its presumptions, its hopes, its desires, and so on. this isn't and shouldn't be a surprise to any of us. and it’s not an issue. natural scientific research methodologies and discourses are not an issue. this isn’t an argument about quantitative work versus qualitative work. but there is an argument that needs to be understood and articulated. it’s an argument about dominance and what falls into shadow under such dominance, what has been lost, forgotten. because, as ecology has taught us in this past several decades and as many of us knew far before then, having a dominant or invasive, or pernicious, or exotic species in a certain place can sometimes take over and choke out the possibility of anything else. and, therefore, in the long run, in a lot of those cases, it can come to choke out the conditions of its own survival through its very act of domination. monocultures are unsustainable. being concerned about the dominance of naturalscientific discourse is therefore an act of love, an act directed at sustaining its well-being. it has lost any sense of proportion, any sense of having a place in our lives. it has taken over and become, well, monstrous. this is a very, very interesting phenomenon. ivan illich called it counter-productivity: up to a certain point such "advancements" and "progress" and "expansion" and "standardization" and "centralization" are sensible. but after a certain point, the way he put it was, the various ways of working in the world begin to create the very thing that they were designed to solve or to resolve. they begin to create the very thing they are trying to fix. that’s why school is producing ignorance, hospitals are producing super-bugs, and deerfoot trail is producing traffic congestion. it was great for a while, right? however, these things reach a certain level where, because of their predominance, they start to unwittingly work against jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 7 the very conditions under which they were working in the first place. so what i want to talk to you about today is not natural science methodology, quantitative methodology, but its dominance and how that dominance has affected us and affects what you want to do in this class, what it means then to try to articulate something other than that dominant paradigm. one of the things about a dominant discourse that is important to remember is that those caught up in that dominant discourse don't have to understand any of this. but there is something more troubling at work here. not only does a dominant discourse get to speak, and to get funded, to act and to be in positions of power and judgment which marginalize other forms of work, other ways of speaking and thinking and researching. a dominant discourse displays the depth of its dominance in its ability to define and shape the nature and limits of any resistance to that dominance. its dominance is had in its unquestioned ability to characterize and speak on behalf of that which it is not. just like the british got to speak about africans, or teacher gets to name children and their special needs and no one gets to speak back (speaking back simply indicates that that child has "oppositional defiance disorder"). it is a very interesting relationship which hints at how all this is not simply an issue of "research methodologies" at all, but something older, more dangerous, and pervasive. i want to elaborate this phenomenon of dominance one step further at the front end here because this will, you'll find, be where the really difficult work in this class will have to be done if you are going to understand interpretive work. because of the dominance of natural-scientific discourse, that discourse provides a lingering image of what it would mean to do any other sort of work. all too often over these past 25 years i've see professors and students working with an illinformed image of interpretive work that is simply a projection of what the dominant voice of natural-scientific work allows alternatives to be. it's about telling your story. it's about people's experiences. we all have our own point of view. it's subjective, its personal, touchy-feely, wholeness, mush, and it's easy because you just say what you think, right? all of that and much more, is the dominant discourse’s story about what you could possibly do if you don’t do natural scientific research. if we are objective, you guys must be subjective. if we are hard, you are soft, if we have outcomes, you have poetic suggestions and temptations, and so on. but here is where it gets awful. those doing interpretive work start to fall for this. then what happens is that interpretive work starts weakly parroting concerns that are not indigenous to its difference: how many people should i interview? how do you look for themes? what about generalizability? how do you prove that this is not just "your interpretation"?...and so on. because we've understood our own work weakly in the shadow of quantitative work, we fall prey to further weakening by the questions that then arise out of that weakness. and so part of the alertness that i expect this course is about and that good interpretive work must take on as part of the work itself, is about working on our own ability to remember what has happened to us in our attempts to do something different than the dominant discourse allows. this is why you'll find that in interpretive work there is a vivid interest in history, not in order to "understand the past" but to decode our present circumstances and revive our current memory loss. because the ditch that is really easy for this work to fall into is wide and powerful to the extent that we give way and if we don’t remain alert, we can end up falling for precisely the meager and weakened caricature version of what we do in jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 8 interpretive work that has been "granted" to us by the presumptions of the sort of work we wish to step away from. this is just like nurses falling prey to the caricatures that doctors can have of them and their work, or teachers falling prey to the belittling of their practical knowledge in the face of standardized provincial examinations and the fraser institute's calls for accountability. in other words, this class isn't just about research methodologies, but about a structure of our lives, our living, that we have inherited and need to start decoding. just a warning, then, that this isn't a situation that you fix up at the front end of an interpretive study so that you can then proceed free and clear of it. you never get free and clear of the world. it is persistent--what is this about, where did this come from, how did we end up speaking like this in this world of ours, what do we do now? this ongoing decoding and the stumbles and recoveries it requires, is the work itself. in my profession for example, the troubled child that can’t pay attention is named that way by the very system for whom troubledness is already pathologized from the outset and so we don’t actually need to listen to that child because we already know what they could possibly legitimately say--this "code" or that one. we once named them "wild and willful" so they could be punished and have their wills broken (see alice miller's work on "black pedagogy"). we now name them adhd so they can be medicated. and that’s what dominance does i already know in advance what you can possibly say to me, so you really don’t need to say anything because you’ll either say what i already know or you’ll be wrong. the only reason for you to speak is so that i can find the right slot, not so i can ever question that slotting itself. that is a given, the "outcome" of research. the only issue now is "which slot." i will admit that that slotting might be in error or that i've mischaracterized the slots and perhaps there should be more or less or different ones, but the correcting of that error means that in the future, it will be less likely for correction to be needed--the goal being to put an end, via dominance, of that which resists that dominance, either through sacrifice (you will be eliminated if you resist--kicked out of school, put in a home, medicated into oblivion) or salvation--you will be saved if you don't resist. resistance is futile because even resistance has been coded. this reminds me of why libraries were burned down by christian and muslim groups back in the 11th century in northern africa and southern europe. they realized that all the books in there either say the same things as the bible/koran, and therefore the library's collection was not necessary, or those books say something different than the bible/koran and, therefore, that collections were heretical. either way, just burn them down. differently put, interpretive work is very interested in normativity, dominance, issues of identity (cultural, linguistic, personal, gendered, even the great divide of the ill and the well, the quick and the dead) and how these things gets sorted out, and by whom, and to what ends, and so on. the sheer naive innocence we have about words, ideas, images, has to be interrupted, as does the sheer confidence that this is just a technical problem, and that technology will save us, or science or medicine or education. people will die and stupidity will win out almost every time. these are our real circumstances. everything is contaminated, embedded, interdependent, and nothing is what it seems on the calm surface. that is why interpretive work is interested in things like the leveling of thinking and idle chatter and how familiarity can breed contempt, and the like. that is why interpretive work has helped us understand that not only is natural-scientific work dominant on the scene of research. it is an act of domination--knowledge as dominion. and again, any form of thinking and study jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 9 that is not premised on dominion gets cast as fuzzy, soft, feminine, weak, emotional, subjective, and, in the end, self-indulgent. just like hermeneutics! okay, so i want to talk today then a bit about our amnesia. one thing that happens in a lot of research methodologies is that we believe at the outset that they are simply something that someone can tell you how to "do": here’s how you do it and then you do it. right? and we find ourselves in a position at the university and in schools, and then lots of other quarters, that if a research methodology asks something more than that of me than that, then something weird is going on. and one of the things about interpretive work that is so painful is that at the outset it demands that we stop thinking about what to do and start to think about what’s already been done to us and how it’s ended up this way and why we talk about kids or patients or clients like this or that, and where those images and names and taken-for-granted practices came from and what they are dragging along with them. like david smith said, underneath the calm and cool and familiar and taken-for-granted surface of things, whether life itself has a chance, or whether the surface is all there is. but what very often happens in our culture is that we orient to simply what's next to accomplish and skip from surface to surface. everything seems to be about just staying calm and afloat on the surface. just letting it go by and saying, well, as a high school teacher said to me recently (and i’ve heard this dozens of times), "you don’t understand, this is just the real world. this is just the way things are." right? it’s just the way things are. you're reading too much into it because there isn't anything really there. the surface is all there is. and all we can do is keep going because if you slow down, you're sunk. well, one of the fundamental beliefs in interpretive work is that this isn't simply "the way things are." this is how things turned out, and there are reasons that things turned out this way and not some other way--there are voices there, stories, things that have been forgotten and silenced and marginalized, hopes that have atrophied or been suppressed. not thinking about these matters, exploring them, "researching" them, doesn't mean that the world is not full of implications on our very lives and the lives of our students and patients and friends. and because of that, the very confidence with which we do what we do is surrounded by failure, by exclusion, by erasure, by lost dependents, by amnesia. and, therefore, to actually understand what we’re doing is to try to wake up and understand the fixes we are in, where they came from, and what might now be possible, what freedom or refuge we might want or need in the middle of all this. wanting to try to wake up from this amnesiac state is a life-long task. and it’s also the definition of the tragedy of human life because, you know, now, at this is the tail-end of my career, i’m now starting to figure out that schools are pretty much the same as they were when i started thinking and writing about these things. there is a strange message here, that this work of thinking about our lives--well, not everyone is interested, not everyone is up to that task, and this has always and everywhere been true. you are here in this opulent position of grad school, where you've decided, whether you know it or not, to stop slumbering. and even though part of what comes to consciousness is that this venture is joyfully hopeless, even though we know we won't somehow finally succeed, still, that is the direction that interpretive work deliberately and bloody-mindedly faces: trying, again and again, to remember these threads of inheritance that we’re dragging with us, what they’ve done to us, and how our work gets shaped by those things whether we know it or not, whether we like it or not, whether we exjardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 10 perience it or not, whether we care or not. that’s why this work isn’t about telling me about your experiences. because our experiences are manipulated and designed and destined to forget very often. this is why this work isn't about securing some safe place from which to launch a methodology, because it is about being implicated without having meant or intended to be, without knowing it, without deserving it. this is why hermeneutics infuses in phenomenology's interest in "lived experience" the terrifying prospect of "false consciousness," where lived experience often hides darkness under its bright presence. so i want to start off by sketching out a very simple example that comes from a scenario in the classroom. think of a situation of a teacher who’s been in a school for quite a while and has taught in that school for several years and a new student comes into the classroom and the teacher automatically recognizes she taught the older sibling of this new student three years ago when the two children’s parents were breaking up. things didn't go well. so up wells the strife of that past event and becomes something of the surrounding of this new student, and even the efforts to hold this at bay have their own complex surroundings of past experiences-professional development seminars bent on detailing how to deal with such uprisings in yourself as a teacher-"ten tips for tough teaching," and so on. even the old saw of "every child is an individual" is profoundly full of ancestral ideas, voices, controversies and the like, even though we might not experience these immediately, they are the undergrowth that is part of the fertility in the soil we inhabit. so when the separate and single event of this one child arriving occurs, we all know that there is no such thing, actually. echoes from the classroom across the hall where this child was taught last year; a blue file folder with too much and too little information, faint memories of staff room conversations long forgotten. it may take a long time to work through, to work out or unravel, and so the memories of the teacher and the presumptions of the teacher and the past experiences of the teacher all get tangled and ignited under the auspices of what was supposed to be a single event. now that other teacher who taught this new child last year across the hall was once a friend of the principal who has since transferred, and last year's vice-principal is now the principal. it was she, as vice-principal, who had to "deal with" this student last year, troublesome, with a file "this thick" and they had an ipp (individual program plan) for him as prescribed by alberta education, mandated under a program of studies written by "those guys" up in edmonton (whom the nowtransferred principal slavishly admired and the new principal wants to set to the side in favor of a more "inquiry based" approach to teaching and learning). and, of course, surrounding those guys in edmonton, as well as this "new" thing, "inquiry," are tangled in arrays of influences, affiliations, research, histories old and new, sob-stories, exaggerations, frustrations, success stories, hopes and desires and fears, and the like. causes and conditions all the way down. now yet another new student comes in the room with his parents, and we all know, intimately and with great familiarity, that this doesn't simply add "one more thing" into the mix but in fact cascades through that already tumultuous mix, making each of the already roiling arisings tangle and untangle and thread and unthread, all over again. it's just like a new child in my family wasn't just "one more," but actually rattled back through those relations that were already ongoing, and actually transformed me into a father and my father into a grandfather and made my father's fathering of me an issue that it hadn't quite been before. nothing is every just "itself." jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 11 now, there’s no sense going on and on about an example like this because it’s all too ordinary for words in some ways-at each moment, we end up with these clusters of dependent co-arising that rise and fall, come forward and recede, undulating, remembered, forgotten, resolved. and we all know that you can become practiced in finding your way through these things artfully, professionally and well. it is like imagining running down a crowded sidewalk. you can't exactly give rules for how to do it, but it can be done, and even if you run into someone, we know, within negotiated parameters, how to correct this error and carry on--apologize, explain, and off we go. the principal relates to the ministry, the ministry's mandates guide the teaching of the child, the child relates to the new child, the new child is in the school of the principal, the parents, the leg bone's connected . . . thigh bone, hip replacement. it’s so ordinary, that its fabric and its workings, fall from sight very easily. it’s just normal, right? now it’s hard to believe, but this phenomenon was downright revolutionary when it entered explicitly into the history of research/philosophy around 1900. edmund husserl, in 1902, wrote the logical investigations--one of the founding documents of contemporary phenomenology, and he formulated the idea of--this is the technical term he uses: it is called everyday life. or in german: the life-world, lebenswelt. the life world… like, well, this. just everyday, ordinary, simple, negotiated, complex, multivocal, populated sites of action and agency, of words and images and ideas and projections and secrets, of past experiences and desires, of market manipulations and media events, kings and queens and great urban bustles, and hospitals and schools...great big institutions forged with forgotten memories and hopes and aspirations, with all the ordinary charts and graphs, political suasions, issues of advocacy and accountability, cultures and multicultures, gender roles and disputes, heat and little light, economic pressures, lies and truths, facts and fictions, and on and on and on. all this mess. so in walks this second child into the classroom [laughs]. this is what husserl got a glimpse of, that even the small event of a child walking into a classroom happens right in the middle of this whole tumultuous world with all the implicate orders of causes and conditions, all the mixed cultural memories, all the old decisions about schools and grades and everything all jumbled and all attached. ordinary. the life world. and you can add in here too all the arrays of labels that can be used to name this kid—i love the latest one, "oppositional defiant disorder," where you not agreeing with me labeling you has a label. or "learning delayed" or "gifted." and then even the controversies that these labels are not meant to be casually used like this. . . but husserl identified a thing he called "flowing in," where the specialized discourses produced of the natural sciences' sorting mechanisms start to become part of the ordinary coinage of everyday life. like "normal." and with this also comes the swirl of things we've given up: "retarded," for example...we still carrying the entrails of what we've left behind, so we add "wellness" to "health" because it seems like a good idea, and we know beyond a shadow of a doubt that these terms, too, will wear out, and like beehive hairdos or discoballs, we'll wonder what in god's name we were thinking sometime in the foreseeable future and that this will happen no matter what we do. so you can see how even our language ("that kid must be gifted") --that terms like these in elementary school or high school just waft out into the world and become common coinage as if we don’t need to think about anything. we come to believe that words are jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 12 innocent. it’s just "oh he’s gifted…oh, right." and everybody knows exactly what you mean until you start talking about it and then it gets complicated. that’s why the familiarity of the life-world is such an interesting thing. when you ask people to actually give an account of what another person means when they say "gifted" you end up getting a glimpse of this thick, contentious, ambiguous, contradictory fabric of the life world--what husserl called sedimented layers of sense pile one atop the other and completely obvious until some interruption occurs. the stories start rolling out about the troubles people have had with these labels, and these stories are always more variegated, ambiguous, multiple and heated than the labels themselves. and then, even when some interruption of this familiarity does occur, we tend, for the most part, to do our best to do repair work so we can get back to not thinking about it anymore, get back to finding it obvious. just get better labels so we can get back to not having to think about these things. now, this is where i want to talk particularly about some threads of this complex, contradictory inheritance that we’re all living in the middle of. how did it turn out that, in the midst of all this, natural-scientific discourse became dominant? and, therefore, what is interpretive work, anyway? we need to go back to around 1640. two things. first, remember that we're searching for something about the dominances and amnesia we've learned to live with and have inherited. second, from what we've already seen, there really is no such beginning date, actually. because to actually pinpoint where these ideas would have originated is both important to do and fruitless at the same time. it has this funny aspect to it, because every time you turn around, things unravel and get away again. the gate gets left open. but the reason i am pointing out 1640 is because there was a very clear articulation of a very important shift, philosophically, in europe and in this is buried something vitally important about our current lot. rene descartes' meditations on first philosophy and his discourse on method were both composed around this time. and he had a very interesting purpose for writing these treatises. we have to remember that trying to name this purpose and trying to explore its consequences is not an attempt to find out who the bad guy was, but to find out who our relatives are. genealogy. because descartes' purpose was actually really interesting. he looked out into the world he inhabited and the shifts and changes that were at hand--the shifting power of the church, the burgeoning arising of new sciences, world wide exploration and rising self-consciousness of modern europe, and suggested that if we’re going to understand what’s happening to us and if we’re going to provide some continuity and stability to these freshly emerging new ventures (in particular, what became known as modern science), we’re going to have to find out how to stabilize our relationship to these matters, and find some sort of solid, reliable foundation, some platform, something on which our work can reliably rest. because, as goes the ancient adage, if you don’t build on a foundation then everything you build will be as weak or as solid as the foundation you build it on. and so if we don’t find a solid foundation for this new human venture, we’re going to end up having it collapse on us in all sorts of random and different ways. we’re not going to get anywhere because it’s going to keep eroding itself and so on. so, right off the bat, descartes is interested in the foundations that lie at the advent of modern science, what we've inherited as quantitative research natural science research. his initiating gesture was to ask jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 13 "what is the foundation upon which we should build?" sound familiar? now the interesting thing to realize is that the initiating concern of descartes was an ancient initiating concern. what’s first? what’s most reliable? what’s most solid? what’s most true? what’s most unshakeable? so, in fact, we get in descartes’ work, an echo of ancient religious traditions trying to find out what the foundation of the world is. as we all know, the wise man doesn’t build his house upon the sand. do you remember that old hymn? i can just barely remember it. he builds it on the rock. in other words, foundations are important and they always have been, and even though descartes' efforts were directed towards erasing any old reliances; those very efforts are themselves old and reliant. this is an old, old story, this story of starting anew, and this new story of starting anew casts a new light on something that is age old and makes us able to look at this old thing anew. ta-da! hermeneutics! okay, so, here at the origin of modern science you have the equivalent of a religious invocation. where is my rock? my wife just told me, by the way, jesus decided to build his church with peter (petros) as its foundation--which is the same root as “petrified” meaning "rock. " i just found that out a couple of weeks ago. this is why interpretive work is often really, oh hell, i just thought it was the guy’s name. but it’s not. and what a coincidence that jesus would have picked him, eh? on this rock i will build my church. in other words, right in the presence of all that seriousness that we've lived with ever since, including all the literal-mindedness of fundamentalism, was a beautiful, funny play on words. it’s a good joke actually. i’ll build the church on petros. of course! like i said, that was two weeks ago. this is what you have to get used to when you do interpretive work. that the world has these infinite layers of meaningfulness, that nothing is what it appears to be, and you'll have to get used to being humiliated over and over and over again. humility, humor, humus, being human, earthiness, laughter. when the laughter arises, it's like a secret clue that something is going on beneath the surface calm. like the little anecdotes told in the staff room, or the "there was this patient, once . . . ". yep! all that too! clues. the good news here is that everything, everything, is more interesting than it appears to be. so now descartes is in this conundrum. in education, we call this conundrum the debate over going "back to the basics." and there’s something good about that call. there’s something good about saying “what are we doing?” "should we keep doing this?" "or are we in trouble, on the wrong track?" this, again, is an old story in the life-world, repeated in many ways, and even schools are organized to "start all over again" every september, or every january 1st--clean slates, square one, washing away sins. dead ordinary, this. going back to basics. great thesis topic. what's basic in pediatric oncology, that firm spot where all this rests? not just drugs, not just treatments, not just families and the shadow of death over the young, not just that parents should die before their children, not just that everyone is going to live forever or die eventually. where is peter? so remember, right there at the advent of modern science was something akin to a religious invocation. this is why fundamentalism and foundationalism are of so much interest in interpretive work and why interpretive work is not fundamentalist or foundationalist. it knows that any claim for something being first is familiar, familial, an old story ambiguously akin to other. one more "once upon a time" caught in the fabric of the life world. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 14 so descartes took upon himself this really interesting, brand new age-old task. he decided that he would examine everyday life and all the forms of knowledge and appearances of knowledge and the interdependencies of knowledge and claims to knowledge that he came upon, all the opinions and evidence and superstitions and worries and declarations. all of them. he did this in order to find out whether there was something in everyday life that could be relied on as an unshakeable foundation of how to proceed. he decided to do this in a way that seems abstract at first. he said "i’m going to look at all of these oneby-one"-he called this process "methodical doubt." his premise here was simple but important to stress: if it’s possible to doubt this or that form of knowledge, we’d better not use it. so, i’m walking over here and i’m assuming that the chair is where i see it to be, right? it would be goofy to be walking over here to doubt that, or to doubt that that water bottle i'm reaching for isn't there. but it’s possible to doubt it. i could be hallucinating; i could be dreaming. last night i dreamt about doing this class and i was as convinced then as i am now. so you look out into everyday life and you go…okay we’d better not place our confidence on everyday perception, because if you get drunk or you put one hand in cold water and one hand in warm water and then put them both in the…right? one hand will feel cold, right? so perception is…no, you have to be careful! it can mislead. it can't be trusted because it is possible to be misled. i might be dreaming all this. it's possible. so this is what he did. okay, then he said "well, well, what about everything my parents told me? " anybody want to guess? i don’t know about your parents…[student: "they were wrong?" (laughter)]. it's even worse that than! they may have been right and i could have simply misunderstood them. i could be wrong about them being wrong! it could have been me! you see, that doubt is possible. they could have been perfect in their knowledge, but i don’t know for sure that i understood them properly. and they could have been imperfect in their knowledge, right? so he says, oh you can’t do that…. this won't provide a solid foundation on which to build, what my parents taught me. what about everything we read from the ancients? aristotle, plato, all those texts that we have inherited. well, there could have been bad errors when the text was translated from greek into latin, and so on. they may have been deluded. i might be incapable of understanding, may have read it the wrong way. and even if i've read the commentaries, this or that commentator may have been nuts, or motivated by lust or desire or selfaggrandizement. so descartes kept going through all of this. what about everything my teachers told me? what about everything that people say on the street? go back to that example in the classroom. what the principal says? what the former principal says? what the parents contend? the child's experience? the education textbooks? the ministry of education? the latest research? older research? the newspaper? the fraser institute? my own opinions? what? who? the doctor, the patient, the drug salesman, the janitor? i can't even be trusted to read the word of god in a way that is beyond doubt...literacy, translations from aramaic, the interventions of the church in editing things, my own feeble memory! all these familiar ways of the life world can’t be relied on unshakably and as you can see…guess what? descartes discovered that the foundation of the world is not in the world. sound familiar? every single religious tradition has said this…just remember, again, we’re at the advent of modern science. just don’t forget that. that’s why this is so interesting. i cannot find the foundation of the jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 15 world in the world because everything in the world can possibly be doubted. so i can’t go to the world to find the foundation of the knowledge of the world i am trying to build. so this puts descartes in a really interesting position because now he’s sitting by his fire going, well--i remember doing this several time in the sixties--uh-oh, now what am i going to do? because that very thing, the ordinariness of everyday life, that, when i was part of it, was so ordinarily reliable, ends up, because of its very ordinariness, to not be what i need. what do i do? why am i doing this process? this is crazy. i’m going to go nuts. uh-oh. every tether to the world is not to be trusted. he became cut off from every worldly recourse, isolated, severed. in retrospect, this sounds a little crazy, but it’s also an amazingly courageous thought experiment. it’s partially a recapitulation of what most teenagers go through or what everyone goes through when a kid dies, or a parent dies, or a job is lost, or when you leave home and find yourself adrift form all those old comforts. very ordinary, but descartes radicalized this process. where you have this collapse of the familiar certainty that used to cocoon you and make you feel comfortable and it all of a sudden evaporates. it's ecclesiastes. descartes, like that old text, is doing this to himself on purpose. it’s very, very interesting to have done—to try to be deliberate about this. it really is the sort of courageousness that any spiritual discipline requires. shedding the vestments of the world, cutting away, burning away, washing anything that cannot withstand this methodical doubt. purification rituals. baptismal images. umbilical severances of old reliances. old stories, these. so he ends up going, "okay, maybe i should push this further. maybe all of that confidence i have about going through this process of doubt should also be cast into doubt. maybe that’s not reliable either. maybe i’m just nuts. maybe i’m just crazy." and so he ended up in this spot that kept getting smaller and smaller. and he ended up saying, "maybe i’m not doing this process at all. maybe i’m not even doubting the world. " and he got stuck, as we all know, in this really tight curve. "i doubt that i'm going through this process, but i am doubting that i’m going through this process. okay, maybe i should doubt that, but if i do that…?" so it ended up that i can’t doubt that i’m doing this because if i’m doubting that i'm doing this, then i'm doing this, and i can’t get out of that because if i try to get out of that, then i’m trying to get out of it. it sounds like a parlor trick: if i doubt that i'm doubting, then i’m doubting, so i can't doubt it. this is where the old saw that everyone knows about descartes then comes from: he said "i doubt" and doubting is a form of thinking, and therefore, i am thinking and even if i doubt, it is still true. therefore, i am thinking. "i think, therefore, i am. " cogito--like cognition--and ergo [therefore] "i am," in latin, sum. this is kind of like the mona lisa of philosophy-that painting that has become such a visual cliché that's really hard to actually see anymore. everybody’s heard this thing so often, cogito ergo sum, "i think, therefore, i am," that it’s become almost laughable to hear, but in fact it was a really interestingly, weirdly accomplished outcome of trying to find an unshakeable, indubitable foundation. after doubting every single thing in the world, his own doubting of the world showed itself to be indubitable. only once he had completely cut himself off from every escape route through the world did he find the foundation, deep inside himself, inside this abstract presence of himself to himself, "i am." because even if i affirm that "i am not," i am affirming and therefore i am. so what we ended up inheriting from descartes was this really interesting new thing that hadn't quite been imagined this way before: an experience of "myself" as a jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 16 "subject," an "i" that is present to itself with great clarity and distinctness, that is "worldless" and that assuredly is even if everything else is erased. this is new. and yet it is not new. this echoes, of course, the idea of a soul that is "in" the body but not "of" the body. right at the moment of trying to found natural science, descartes hit deep well water. so, now, descartes starts to look at the characteristics of this foundation that he has found through methodical doubt. it is clear and it is distinct. it is singular, it’s selfidentical, and is not confusable with anything else, not attached to anything else, separate, severed off from anything else, decontaminated (mary douglas said that the unclear is the unclean). remember that all descartes is affirming here is "i am." i may not know who i am beyond a shadow of a doubt. i may have a fairly good idea, but not beyond a shadow of a doubt. i may not know what i am. i am not even sure i know where i am, but i always and unshakably do know that i am. in other words, sheer self-identical existence with no properties. i am. singular, univocal, clear, present, without contradiction or duplicity. whatever i am, i am. so you get this really weird abstract version of identity that has no substance to it: whatever this identity might turn out to be (since we don't know what it is, let's simply call it "x"), i know beyond a shadow of a doubt that x=x and this is singular, self-identical, pure and clean and clarified. sheer self-identicalness. okay, old testament, exodus 3:13-3:14. coming down from the mount with the commandments, moses asked god who shall i say has sent me? "and god said unto moses, i am that i am: and he said, thus shalt thou say unto the children of israel, i am hath sent me unto you." just a reminder this is the origin of modern science. just thought i’d mention that again. so what we get in descartes’ work is a reaffirmation of an old story at the same time as we get an affirmation of something "otherworldly," purged of everything old and worldly--sheer existence: i am. so now he’s got himself inside of himself, completely detached from the world and its ways, having found the unshakeable foundation. now it’s not like the world actually ceased to exist in this whole process of methodical doubt. it just slowly and methodically turned into something increasingly unreliable and shaky. so, now here, right here, is the big turn. these new sciences of his time are purporting to investigate the world and they need a foundation that is solid. but the world they are investigating isn't going to give it to them. descartes realized that he can turn his attention back to the world, but now he has to be very careful not to lose what he has won. we don’t want to turn our attention back to the world and get re-absorbed back into that fray of the world and its amnesia, into its forgetfulness, its contingencies, and ambiguities, into its presumptions and start acting on the basis of that because that’s not true to the foundation that has been established. in other words, if i’m going to go out into the world, i have to go out into the world with an eye to the foundation that i have found in my process of methodical doubt, this x=x clarity. if i am going to find any "truth" in the world, i have to demand of the world the same thing i demanded of myself with methodical doubt. what the world really is in truth is not that messy fray of ambiguity and doubt and interrelatedness. if i go out into the world and see something shakable or dubitable, then it’s not real, it's "unfounded." if i go out into the world and see something ambiguous, it’s not real. because to be real is to sit on the foundation and to sit on the foundation is to sit on a self-identical clarity that’s unambiguous and uncontaminated. therefore, anything in the world that admits of ambiguity, multiplicity, jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 17 interrelatedness, interdependence, metaphor, analogy, all those forms of…. well, shall we say, mess? no! truth is not a mess but is rather clear and distinct. therefore if there is any truth to be had about the world, the truth of the world is not a mess. because the truth has to live up to something that is not a mess-the foundation. therefore, when i find my way back out into the world, i have this new demand now that i make upon everything i meet. i do to everything that i meet in the world the same thing that i did to myself. anything that’s doubtable is eradicated; anything that’s ambiguous is eradicated; everything multiple or attached to something else is eradicated. everything has to become, like i did, "itself" and not something else. whatever this thing is that i am investigating in the world, it is what it is and it is not something else. as with my own purified self-identity, i demand such purification from the things i meet: x=x, whatever else may be. so just like a new (but not so new) image of the human subject appeared in the world, now something else new arrives: "objects." in other words, only things which can stand up against methodological doubt (the latin is something like thrown against, oband -iacere) are real, because only they replicate the hard-won truth of the "i am"-singular, separate, clean, clear, distinct, without contaminating relations. so what now happens of course is that descartes starts to say whatever there is in the world, in truth it is self-identical, self-contained, not attached to anything else. descartes ends up quoting aristotle. the term for this in greek philosophy is "substance." "a substance is that which requires nothing except itself in order to exist." that’s his paraphrase of aristotle 3rd century b.c. metaphysics. a "substance" is that which requires nothing else except itself to be what it is in truth. therefore, the initiating presumption of our ventures out into the world is that if we want to know about the truth of that world, we have to cleave off everything we want to investigate from everything it is attached to, every relation it has made, in order to try to get some determination of what the truth of that thing is, and all the subsequent relations of that thing with other things themselves have to be clear and distinct. because its truth is its substance, its self-identicalness, its "x=x." now, just on the side here, this is sounding a little abstract [laughs]. just a little…. this poor child [points to a student in the class] was having trouble learning to read and you [points to another student] were her teacher last year and i’m her teacher this year. and her parents have just come in and they want to know what’s going on. i make a case for her trouble being one thing and you make a case citing some other things. the principal who is also in the room, because that’s what they do, says, "well look, you said one thing, you said another. whatever her reading trouble is, it is what it is. right?" everybody knows that: it is what it is (x=x, even if we can't agree on what this "x" might be). so if it is what it is, and the two teachers contradict one another, the contradiction can’t be in the thing because the thing is what it is. if the thing is what it is, then the contradiction…the contra is in the diction. not in the thing. either you’re right or i’m right or both of us are wrong or we have specified things enough, but things are what they are. the actual trouble in learning to read can’t be ambiguous-it is what it is. that’s what this means. it’s a weird kind of common sense confidence that when we run into ambiguity, something with multiple versions or debates, that it can’t actually be. it must be a mistake of some sort. or lack of diligence or all sorts of stuff. sensible in its own way. so here’s what happens in education. in 1900, somebody publishes an essay called "the child. " a week later, somebody says, jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 18 you know, young kids are like that, but that’s not a really good description of older kids. contradiction. the contradiction can’t be in the thing because things are what they are. there must be two things. so the next week two books get published: "the young child" and "the older child." you can see where we’re headed, right? and then somebody says, well young boys are like that, but young girls aren’t exactly like that. contradiction. there can’t be a contradiction in the thing. there must be two things. next week, four books get published: "young girls," "young boys," "older girls," "older boys." actually, you know, the description you have for young boys is appropriate for boys of a lower socioeconomic status. but in rich families… so what starts to happen then is a process of investigation that purports something, finds a contradiction, bifurcates the thing, and causes two new studies or four or eight or twelve. in other words, now, if you look in quantitative journals in education, you’ll get papers like "the sub-nominal coding level of storyschemata structure in young boys of aboriginal decent in urban settings from 1915 to 1918: new wine in old bottles? " --i made that up, but you wouldn’t quite know it! so what you get in an attempt to protect the purity of the origin from getting contaminated, you get (in your profession more than mine) these titles that become more and more exotic trying to describe something more and more simple, singular and ordinary. more and more particular and straight forward. more and more carefully divided off from anything else. the simple logic of substance, x=x, finds, in travelling the world, that it must constantly divide. so you get this really weird condition of constantly having to qualify your work in order to preserve the purity of the first principle. because if you didn’t have "aboriginal" in the title you’d be confusing one thing for another and things themselves, in principle, aren’t confused so there must be two things. so what we get is this proliferation, which is in the natural sciences, that the natural sciences are profoundly good at. proliferation of specification all with an eye to preserving this first principle, x=x. this is why natural-scientific research must always be "up to date," because it is constantly shedding the encumbrances of ambiguity and hidden contradictions. oh i didn’t mention this. see this baby here [x=x]? this is called the principle of identity. it’s the central principle of formal logic, aristotelian logic. and until speculations about set-theory in the 1930s, it’s the first principle of mathematics. the first principle of mathematics: if you come across an x, x is always x. you might not know what x is, but x is x is x. in working through an algebraic equation, x stays steady inside that equation when you go to another equation, this equation is not that equation, but inside this new equation, x is x--an unknown (not sure what x is) constant (x is x). the principle of identity unfolds into the principle of non-contradiction (something cannot both be x and not be x), which unfolds into the principle of excluded middle, from which unfolds the whole discipline of mathematics. starting with the principle of identity, every step in a mathematical proof participates in the clarity and distinctness of that first principle. each step is clear and distinct. therefore--finally, we've ended up with the origins of quantitative research that dominate our professions--if i go out into the world armed with mathematics, i take with me that hard-won truth of the cogito. as long as i can proceed mathematically, every step participates in the clarity and distinction of the first step. you have to mathematize anything you meet in the world in order for the world to live up to the foundation you have won. welcome to the origin of quantitative research. based on the origin of "i am." if someone asks about the legitimacy of a quantitative study, all you need to say is "i am has sent me." there's just one more hint regarding some of the heat that comes off jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 19 this silly quantitative/qualitative debate. interpretive work seems chaotic, like all hell breaking loose, heathen, pagan--both these mean "of the fields," by the way, outside of the capital (where the sovereign "i am" holds sway). okay, so, just a few more little steps. well, sort of little steps. because the logic we’re talking about here, this logic of doubt, withdrawal, self-clarification, and the subsequent dispensation of that clarity as a demand made upon things--this is far more widespread than in the natural sciences. it’s important then to realize that this movement of condensation, the collecting together of confidence then issuance of confidence with great confidence has analogies historically and philosophically that we need to face up to because the dominant discourse of the natural sciences has kin and brethren that it doesn’t know it has and i just want to talk a little bit about what those are. we've got to explore something of the terrible heat we often feel when we try to interrupt this cartesian logic. okay, remember that i’m doing this for the world’s own good. if this selfidenticalness is actually the world’s foundation of truth, then demanding this of the world is an attempt to help the world live up to its own truth and to help it discard those elements that are not part of what it truly is. or to put it differently, the world is full falseness and fallenness, amnesia and sin and carnality, lies, deception, ambiguity, messiness, contradiction. and in order to understand the truth of the world is to save it from itself by demanding that it shed that which is not essential to its substance. i come in the name of truth. so there is, in this movement, an often hidden sense of its beneficence behind all of it. or to put it another way, i’m doing this for your own good. i’m trying to save you from your own encumbrance that you don't even know that you have. you all know the term used when you have something in your quantitative research design that you forgot to control for and your results end up with this uncontrolled thing in them messing up your results? contamination--your results can easily be contaminated. so, all of this is a type of purification ritual -descartes' methodical doubt was a purification ritual. descartes sought the foundation of modern science in something akin to a purification ritual, as does every natural-scientific study that follows it. the life-world needs rescue from itself. more strongly put, these studies are salvational in their design and intent. okay, so, purification, salvation, decontamination, the getting-rid-of outliers, the pulling of things into line, eradicating that which will not submit. as if this is the way that the world actually exists…separate, selfidentical substances, whose relationships to one another are all post-hoc. remember that? objects. then we have to realize that in order to get the world to be like this, we may need to render it like this in order to save it from its untruth and render it into its truth. steps. i know what’s true. i know what the foundation is. i know what’s most real. i know what it is to be a human being and venture properly in the world and be concerned after its truth. therefore, when i venture out into the world and i run into people who do not understand this, it is my moral obligation to take with me something of this lesson i’ve learned--to india or to africa or to north america. and, for their own good, i must let these people i meet know that if they mistakenly feel at home here in this mess, they are not actually, really "home." you’re actually away from home, immersed in the blood body of the world, without the "i am" to guide you. home is actually "over there," in england, under the crown (like the crown of consciousness, victoria as the "i am" of the empire). so out here in the wilds, i’ll put in a home office, and you’ll have to get a pass that requires you to jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 20 home in on where home really is, that marks you as being protected under the crown--like a pass-port to pass through the portal, showing your "identity," your "identification." now i’m doing this for your own good. i’m helping you to become civilized. i’m helping you cleave to the truth of things. and so, one the analogies that we’re dealing with here is colonialism. a couple of centuries earlier than descartes, just prior to isabella giving the contract to columbus in 1492, the jews and the moors were expelled from the south of spain because isabella realized that until we become ourselves and no others (until a=a), we won’t be strong. only when we become strong can we then head out and build an empire. and so we "self-clarify" by purging ourselves of everything we are not--we become a self-identical nation-state purged of all contamination. so we kick out all the jews and the moors or worse, sometimes we kept them here and kicked them out in a different way-the inquisition was a purification ritual demanding singularity. we do this for their own good of course, too. by the way, two weeks after columbus got his contract with isabella to sail west, a guy named nebrija, whose name is still on many libraries in spain, a grammarian who went to isabella and said, basically, that until you have a single language in your kingdom, you cannot have an empire. and, therefore, you need to standardize, clarify and decontaminate and universalize castilian spanish and make it mandatory for everyone in your purview to give up the vernacular in order to be considered part of the kingdom. so to speak. so language itself was standardized by becoming singular, unambiguous, not multiple anymore, and this was done as a way to launch the colonial confidence of spain westward. language becomes singular and self-identical. x=x. this is exactly the same as the move to strip first nations kids of their language and their family names, again for their own good. it is exactly the same. and we'll have no moors and jews in our midst, no "others." purification, with, like descartes methodical doubt, a move inwards towards the clean and clear and distinct self-identity requisite of this new phenomenon in the world: the nation-state. the very idea of a nation-state is premised on this state of singularization, and dumping our contingent relationships to the diversity and multiplicity in our midst, telling it to either smarten up or leave. this is canada, mr. singh, you better either become one of "us" or go back where you came from. so, purification, standardization, expulsion, what else? this founding of the nation-state in spain doesn’t just back away into itself. it backs away, "founds" or "grounds" itself, and then launches back out into the world. this is the same analogous movement as the origin and launching of modern science. because modern science will go out and demand mathematicity from the world in the same way that the spanish would go out and say "christian or not?" enrique dussel talks about the dual myths that arise here: the myth of sacrifice or the myth of salvation: i will save you (by making you into me) or i will kill you (but sacrificing you will be for your own good, so sacrificing you will save you, because if you're not me, you're already living in untruth anyway). george bush: you are either with us, or you are with the terrorists. okay, so now, purification, colonialism, standardization. through clarification, "we" control the right of passage to the truth--the "colon" through which you must pass in order to pass. so then, when the british empire starts collapsing and retreating, what happens? all sorts of brown people pass with their passports through the portal and "come home." they show up at england's door saying "hi mom. we're home!" yes, that’s a rite of passage, that things must "pass through" the narrows of mathejardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 21 matics--colon. in fact, “christophe colon” is columbus’s real name, which is just unbelievable. but in order to be a citizen of the world, his name had to be latinized. because of the roman empire and the centrality of latin, latin made you a citizen, civilized-these colonizing demands are age-old. carolus linne became linnaeus right, because you weren’t a citizen of the world until your name, even your name, was rendered under a universal standard, latinized. this is why learning latin was linked to be a civilized and educated person--still at work in my own days at school, this still lingered. (the grammar of our civility (pearcy, 2005)--very interesting book by the way). so this is a really old, interesting story. to find out that this guy linnaeus wasn’t really linnaeus, it was linne. and he had to give that up in order for him to properly be himself. which, again, is why first nations children in canada had their names and language removed as an act of beneficently saving them from themselves. it is also why their land was privatized, because then, land gets linked to ownership, and ownership is linked to rights of governance or domination over that land, so property ownership became identified, in the us, for example, with the right to vote. only as a property owner is the dominance of my "i am" able to manifest. ok, so, yes, copyright laws. okay, let’s just keep going a little bit further here. it’s not that i and things in the world don’t have relationships, but they’re all post-hoc. they’re all "after the fact" of things and selves existing separately, divided off. that is existing indivisibly. that is individually. as with descartes, we now take these truths to be self-evident. contemporary notions of individualism, this is where it starts. this is what the autonomy and selfdetermination and individuality that underwrites contemporary democracy, this is where it comes from. so, now, if you go back and see all these autonomous beings all of whose relationships are post-hoc, and that is after the fact of their autonomy, everything is revocable and provisional, including your culture, right? so this is where we get modern versions of multiculturalism. where your culture becomes a "choice" made by someone who is really and truly autonomous individual, not really a moslem or a jew. you’re an individual and then, in "our" culture (which now isn't a culture among others, but simply an expression of the way things truly are), you get to choose the practices of your culture or not. but these choices are now post hoc, after the fact, simply personal and subjective, because only the relationships that themselves can be mathematized are "real" or "true" relationships. so then you not only get frequency and repeatability of relationships or they’re not real, you also get the enumeration or mathematization, of all these relationships. these are all zero sum relations that can be quantified. in other words, the community is full of autonomous "x=x"s and the real relationships between these autonomous individuals are only those that can be mathematized. so, first of all, everyone gets one vote and then we add them up. it's only fair. it has nothing to do with who you are, what you know, whether you have any sense at all regarding what a good choice might be. after all, who am i to say? i'm just one more voter, and whoever gets the most wins. parallel to this, community becomes identified with the market, because now you get relationships of ownership (by an "i am") and then the only "real" relationships are those that can be measured, so community becomes commerce between autonomous "i am" owners-persons. that’s why you guys are called clients and customers of the university and it’s all about choice and individual freedom. this is where the discourse is coming from…so you also get the market, and you also get capitalism as a standardized system of exchange that slowly jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 22 starts to replace the messiness of barter and the commons. check out the history of the enclosure movement in europe, privatization, taxation, where commoners who worked the commons became tax paying employees, and the land became owned. market economies and capitalism are premised on this new sense of individuality. purification, colonialism, individuality, privatization, democracy, market economies, multiculturalism. but then, because of all this--and we're still experiencing this day to day-we get these strange senses of alienation from our community and from our work that now has become distant, disembodied, standardized rulefollowing, so you end up with karl marx critiquing the alienation of workers. and also, given that we’re all, in reality and in truth standing separately from each other, we also now need a mathematized/medicalized understanding of our sinful and lusty relations to each other or our sense of depression and alienation. freud: no more fucking in the bushes! well, you’re still fucking in the bushes, but now you’re unhappy about it because you all know that it’s contamination, but it is no longer a church matter full of snakes-in-thetrees storytelling superstition reprimands, but is now medicalized syndromes that have mathematized our sin, coded it into identifiable dsm-iv slots. wellness! a personal matter. even better! self-improvement is sold back to us as a cure for the ails that that selling has caused. colonialism, capitalism, democracy, individualism, psychologism, market economy… oh and by the way, i live in bragg creek and for your own good we’re going to cut those paths wider to prevent forest fires. to prevent forest fires means to prevent a waste of capital--new initiatives for clear cutting were fronted by forestry companies, so the material of the forest will still be logged safely, and so insurance companies are satisfied. so we have the beginnings of an ecological disaster here as well, severed from the world and then unhesitatingly ravaging the earth for its own good into board feet of consumable lumber. like quantitative research will invade the classroom and save the messy life worlds of children and teachers by building subdivisions. that wild itself has no truth in it. it becomes true only when it is civilized, when the rough beast of the bush becomes a trimmed british garden. only when the earth submits to god's command that we, in his name, have dominion over the earth--only then is it truly itself. so there it is again, ecologists sound romantic, hysterical, "spiritual" (i.e., messed up), but not in any sense true (since the criteria of truth is that things exist independently of one another, and claiming dependent co-arising cannot be true, only a blurring of what has been made clear-cut). just like these brown newcomers and their constant complaints about canada. shape up or ship out. okay, ecological ravaging is colonial is cartesian is the root of quantitative methodologies. the earth is private property because only when it is owned is it brought under the measure of an "i am" and only then is it in truth what it really is. native people are wrong and need to be saved from their silly ideas. they need to learn reserve. i know, it's not funny. okay, three more. if this is the way that people actually exist, then i’m just going to add a really interesting thing that happened in 1540 or about, and that is the printing press. which meant a couple of things. the ability to disseminate the written word quickly and easily. then you get the rise of literacy and an increasing suspicion of orality, storytelling, things passed from breath to breath, women talking in the woods, conspiracy. those nurses telling tales during the break, those teachers in the staffroom full of messy little anecdotes--nothing true there, onjardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 23 ly mostly women talking and talking. so the move from orality to literacy and the increased suspicion of muttering. literacy as a way to tame the wild, become civilized, civil. and also, right here, put up your hand if you’re a lutheran. any lutherans? okay… luther took it upon himself to translate the bible into german, into the vernacular and away from the standardization of the church because believers are individuals and must work out individually their relationship to god and its saving grace. no longer mediated through the mess of the world and churchy control, no longer through the line of saints and commentators and mediators or priests as your stand-in. so, thank you printing press, we’re going to give you each a german bible if you’re a german so that you can read it yourself. so you put a bible in each of these houses. to put it differently, protestantism doesn’t make sense without these: individuality, autonomy, "i am," and so on. protestantism needs cartesianism's loosing of individuality in a new way. this is why protestant churches have empty crosses and not crucifixes. the body of christ, the world-body, is now risen, absent. no more worldly images, no more statues and portraits, no more working our way through the bloody corpse of the life world. or to put it differently, that old life-world mess of a diagram that we were looking at before was very catholic. old council of nicaea arguments, back to 767 ce, about images and their dangerous allures--not just false, this, as we all sit groggy in front of the latest news. it's the trouble of danish cartoonists as well. remember this is the origin of modern science. okay, so protestantism and islamic iconophobias. the glance looking for truth must look "upwards" to the heavenliness of the "i am" and away from the mess of the flesh. and of course, if you’re going to put a bible in every house and have people read the bible themselves, they had better be able to read because it’s really, really important and if you can’t, you’re really in bad trouble. some origins of modern schooling began here and so now we’re back to the kid who is having trouble reading. meanwhile, of course, we've also become a culture that is simply slathered with rapid, seductive images and we think, now, that we can just toy with these things, like naive innocents, that somehow our "individuality" and "choice" is going to protect us from being led astray. hah! hilarious. we get alienated, severed from our surroundings and our earth selves and then, full of guilt, get emotionally caught up in reality tv as a sort of pornoreplacement for living a life. just like with the shows of african kids with flies on their eyes and sad faces: arms-length guilt-manipulated poverty porn. one more convoluted thread. last one, i promise. remember how nice it was when we started out and everything was fine? looks funny now--we just talked with one another, got our cups of coffee, joked, and settled in, and what starts to happen is that this ordinariness starts to look peculiar. this dominant discourse of the natural sciences starting to cast a shadow over the everyday life from which it has withdrawn and which it then renders into the objective world by mathematization. anything not mathematized starts to look different, look, well…wild and woolly and out of control, and chaotic--individual, personal, subjective, fanciful, random, idiosyncratic, and so on. so in schools if you talk about pursuing an adventurous inquiry with students, you're saying that the kids can now to whatever they want, right? because that’s what this means now, right? you do what you’re told (quantitative research) or you do whatever you want (qualitative research). these now seem like the only alternatives and this infests interpretive work itself: either jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 24 i just passively let my participants tell their story, or i tell mine. us and them. if we let go of mathematization, all hell breaks loose. see what just happened? if the opposite of doing what you’re told is to do whatever you want, you’ve left in place the idea of individuality, left in place that the only way out of individuality is mathematization, and then simply dropped the math. if you do this, any story that someone tells you is their own personal property and only they get to say what it means. so in attempting to get away from the dominant logic of the natural sciences, we leave it in place, accept all its premises, and then opt for the only opposite that that dominant logic leaves available. this is this weird double logic where the dominant discourse starts to say, “nurses, all they do is hang around and tell each other stories…and they just clean up after people and take care of them. they don’t know anything in that actual practice of nursing except what medical science has taught them. there is no knowledge in the life-world, just messy, uncivilized exchanges.” same goes for teachers: no sense talking to them about their classroom and what is going on because they are involved in it, caught up in its messy flesh, and therefore don't and can't know, in truth, what is occurring there. they are contaminated. so even if i collect these stories together in my interpretive research, i have to distill (purify) them into themes that are repeated, because repeatedness means (ac)countability, and frequency means some truth is there, something reliable. but the truth is not in the telling, but in the renderable essence that can be gleaned from it providing you speak with a statistically significant number of "participants." so students who want to do hermeneutics ask me, how many participants should i talk to? so you get all of these stories told by the dominant discourse of the natural sciences, not just about itself, but what you possibly could be doing if you weren’t doing that. this is the trick you have to remember. because when that happens, when we try to do interpretive work, we start to take on the language that the dominant discourse has left us with. if we’re not objective, what are we? subjective! and a lot of us go, "yep, you betcha, that's us." because what interpretive work must be, we are told, it’s subjective. and the dominant discourse, meanwhile is going, “oh, this is fantastic. perfect." because, in doing this, you have, in your very attempt to get away from the dominant discourse, confirmed that dominance by accepting the description of your own work that is supposed to be the alternative to the dominant discourse. remember, the dominant discourse of the natural sciences is not simply predominant. it is about knowledge-as-domination. or to put it differently, here's the difficult part of this course you're taking: interpretive work is not subjective, it’s not about personal experiences, it’s not about people telling their story and finding themes, that is all a crappy version of quantitative research that is found in almost every single book about how to do qualitative research. it is simply falling for the shadow-version of interpretive work that the natural sciences allow. hook, line, and sinker. you can look in textbook after textbook after textbook. they are simply full of nothing more than weak quantitative work in the guise of fuzziness, softness, resonance, feeling, emotion, or other such stupid things. women's work. touchy-feely. nurse-y stuff. interpretive work is about how to approach the life-world and understand its life without threatening it, and domination and demand. so, then, that last one i've promised too often, and then we can have a break. this is the one i always don’t want to talk about, but i am going to. on the one hand, material, the material world, the messy life world, blood and guts, trails of implication jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 25 and interrelation, innuendo, stories, fabrics, like text and textile, and we're caught up in this world, defined by it in ways that have already taken hold of us before we try to get ahold of them. implicated--like gadamer says, beyond our wanting and doing. materiality. and then, on the other, we have the pattern-the self-identical, the autonomous, the rendered into a=a, the clear and distinct and morally correct. mathematics is based on the recognition and clear and distinct repetition of pattern, right, replicability? repeated standardizable pattern is the only path to reliability. otherwise one's results are not reliable. materiality is unreliable. and remember, in such mathematization, "i" become "one." "i" must become anyone in order for my research results to be true. otherwise, i have contaminated those results. the methodology must be wielded anonymously. i must be completely and utterly replaceable. only when i am replaceable are the results i have found detachable from my finding of them. only then are then "objective." but we have to remember what this logic has left us with, that material needs pattern in order to understand its own truth. left to itself, the materiality of the world has no indigenous truth because it is simply caught up in its messy interdependences. it is blind, mute, unknowing, stupid, dull, full of torpid familiarities. unless the pattern of material can be gleaned, then we don’t know anything true about material. it’s just subjective then, right? or accidental, or anecdotal or whatever. so it’s important, it’s a moral necessity that pattern demand of material that the material live up to the demand that the pattern makes on it. and if it doesn’t, then it is refusing to be in truth, refusing to recognize its own truth, refusing to give up that which is not true of it, its accidentalness, its contingency, its earthboundedness. therefore, it is the moral obligation of pattern, if it has to, to impose itself on the material of the world for the good of the material of the world. not because it wants to be dominating or anything, but because it doesn’t understand this forceful imposition as an act of domination. it’s an act of salvation, of liberation. the colonizers in north america were always smiling. they always had good news, if you would only shut up and listen. the forceful imposition of pattern on material. so let's erase the letters that hide the truth here: pattern, pater, material, mater. at the advent of modern science, we have the old and familiar adage, that if she would only have fucking listened to me, i wouldn’t have had to hit her, but she just kept fucking talking and she wouldn’t do what i asked her to do, she kept talking back and kept fucking with me. so i had to stop her. i didn't want to, but it was for her own good. during his methodical meditations, outside of descartes' window, women were being burned as witches … . . . maybe we should get some coffee. references chah, a. (1987). our real home: a talk to an aging lay disciple approaching death. access to insight. retrieved from http: // www. accesstoinsight. org/ lib/thai/chah/bl111.html. hillman, j. (2005). senex and puer: an aspect of the historical and psychological present. in senex and puer (pp. 30-70). putnam, ct: spring publications. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 8 26 gadamer, h.g. (1986). the idea of the university--yesterday, today, tomorrow. in d. misgeld & g. nicholson (eds. & trans.), hans-georg gadamer on education, poetry, and history: applied hermeneutics (pp. 47-62). albany, ny: suny. gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method. new york, ny: continuum books. gadamer, h.g. (2001). gadamer in conversation: reflections and commentary, (r. palmer, ed. & trans.) new haven, ct: yale university press. illich, i. (1993). in the vineyard of the text: a commentary on hugh's didascalicon. chicago, il: university of chicago press. kunzang pelden, k. (2007). the nectar of manjushri’s speech. boston, ma: shambhala books. rinpoche, p. (1998). the words of my perfect teacher. boston, ma: shambhala books. pearcy, l.t. (2005). the grammar of our civility. waco, tx: baylor university press tsong-kha-pa (2000). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (lam rim chen mo). volume one. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. tsong-kha-pa (2002). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (lam rim chen mo). volume two. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. tsong-kha-pa (2004). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (lam rim chen mo). volume three. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. microsoft word bjartveitpanayotidis corrected proof.docx 1 university of calgary corresponding author: carolyn bjartveit email: cjbjartv@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics april 1, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 practicing palimpsest: layering stories and disrupting dominant western narratives in early childhood education carolyn bjartveit1 & e. lisa panayotidis1 abstract interpreting and contextualizing the meanings of spoken, transcribed, visual and embodied languages, we explore how the life stories of immigrant educators evoke socio-cultural and diverse imaginaries. we incorporate the greek practice of palimpsest a layering of stories, voices, fragments, and traces to understand forms of active becomings which provide possibilities for dissonance and transformation and treat the self as relational and inherently multiple. critically reflecting on this stratum of narratives and cultural understandings, we draw on the insights of several theoreticians and scholars to consider how the language of immigration, trauma, and displacement emerge in educators’ thinking about the curriculum they are given. in transcribing stories the participants’ and our own we heard “layered voices” (aoki, 2005) that pointed us to different understandings about the immigrant experience, the connections between the self and other and what it means for immigrant educators and students to live together in ece settings. keywords diversity; early childhood education; hermeneutics; identity; language; narrative embedded in the lives of the ordinary, the marginalized, and the muted, personal narrative responds to the disintegration of master narratives as people make sense of experience, claim identities, and “get a life” by telling and writing their stories. (langellier, as cited in riesseman, 2008, p.17) bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 2 introduction carolyn told lisa a story about the hermeneutic “event” that initiated her doctoral research study: c: five years ago, while i was teaching a child development course in an early childhood education post-secondary program, i was concerned when the administration gave me a single textbook, written by american authors, to use as the core curriculum. not long into the semester, i noticed that immigrant learners in the class had very different ideas about child development and childcare practices than those written about in the course textbook. l: what different ideas? can you give an example? c: well the text noted that western parents see a newborn’s erratic sleep cycle as a behavior problem that requires fixing through parental intervention and forcing infants to sleep through the night – this is a common western childrearing ideai. the authors noted that “in the majority of cultures in the world, babies sleep in the same bed with their parents, typically until they are weaned” (bee & boyd, 2010, p. 70). anyway, one day a major interruption happened in our class that completely changed the focus and direction of teaching and learning. l: go on! what happened next? c: well, an ethiopian student strongly disagreed with the american authors’ perspective and insisted she had experienced no adverse effects from co-sleeping with her mother from infancy to age seven years. her comment opened a floodgate of questions from other students who both agreed and disagreed with her views. it raised quite a stir in class! l: it sounds like your students came to recognize that non-western child rearing customs were represented as abnormal and in opposition to western practices which they deemed normative. through the syllabus students were not asked what they knew but told what to know – what counts as correct. c: exactly! and so for the rest of the semester, i used the course text to open conversations and i invited students to relate their own ideas and experiences to curricular and textbook topics. it was a wakeup call for me – for sure! i recognized the importance of listening to multiple voices and views instead of focusing on a single textbook or my own ideas. i understood how layering our personal stories (mine and the students’) with ideas from several texts and sources, disrupted dominant western narratives about children, childhood and early learning. l: so how does this story relate to your doctoral research? c: i now want to understand how immigrants position them/selves and juxtapose their cultural beliefs and understandings in a dominant western curriculum. my dissertation is bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 3 a collection of life stories mine as well as those recounted by seven early childhood educators who interpreted their biographical experiences through memories, imagination, reflection, and multiple (spoken, written, visual, and embodied) language modalities. in this paper, we critically consider how the interrelation or layering of stories and intercultural dialogue was invoked by immigrant early childhood educators and the researchers (carolyn & lisa) to construct and interpret life-stories narrated in conversation, written research transcriptions and visual images. understanding that our own attempts to work alongside and teach immigrant educators and students are not devoid of challenges and are always framed within western “master narratives” (langellier, as cited in riesseman, 2008) and notions of “whiteness and privilege” (carr & lund, 2007), we believe our struggles can be productive if we tell and attentively listen to stories about the “worlds we come from and those to which we will belong in the future” (henning & kirova, 2012, p. 238). in so doing, early childhood education (ece) classrooms and child care centers in canada might become places where cultures are shared and reconfigured even through opposition and disagreement with differences. after aoki, we understand difference according to “where you locate it, but it’s not either this or that; it’s the working together of both somehow, coming out of the two discourses and bumping into each other and not fitting at all” (smits, 2010, p. 16). etymologically defined, to lay is “to place on the ground (or other surface)” (oed). language digs below the “ground” so-to-speak, unearths buried meanings and creates possibilities for new stories, voices, and understandings to emerge. beyond simply relaying or communicating life stories, we envision layering as a penetrating and complex process, “that intertwines the self … and the other… – which in the hermeneutic language of hans georg gadamer is understood as… intersubjectivity fused in a ‘we’” (aoki, 2005, p. 212). understanding hermeneutics as an “art of deciphering multiple [and allusive] meaning,” philosopher richard kearney (2011, p.1) described it as a reflective, interpretive process that discloses concealed messages, by exposing “covered up” or “surplus” meaning. like kearney, we “understand hermeneutics as the task of interpreting (hermeneuein) plural meaning in response to the polysemy of language and life” (p. 1). furthermore, we explore how layering stories and cultures can, as a critical collaborative and conversational pedagogical and research praxis, disrupt dominant western ideals about children, childcare, and early learning. our critical questions focus on how culture and one’s life stories impact immigrant educators’ understandings of a western ece post-secondary curriculum. notably we focus on how the educators compare what they know about early years education, childhood, and childrearing from their own cultures with what they observe and experience in canadian schools and childcare centers. we ask: what is the role of stories specifically layering stories in shaping our hermeneutic understanding of cultural differences and the experiences of self and other? how does intercultural “polyphonic” dialogue of “multiple voices” (depalma, 2010) serve to situate early childhood educators ontologically (individually and collectively) through the process of interpretation and meaning making? some educators believe that erasing differences and implementing uniformity or likenesses within socio-cultural groups ensures peaceful, agreeable communication and encounters. mikhail bakhtin (1981) has emphasized that, “the collision between differing points of view on the bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 4 world …are pregnant with potential for new world views, with new ‘internal forms’ for perceiving the world in words” (p. 360). equally, failing to invite intercultural dialogue about difference and diversity in ece settings potentially create barriers, misunderstandings, fear, and conflict. through relating and layering narratives the participants’ and our own we “ground” or value the solidified understandings of self and other, thereby acknowledging differences. aoki explained “diversity not as something fixed but as something living dynamically in relation to other identities and the stories that carry those identities, so that the important space is one in which there can be interplay between those stories (smits, 2010, p. 16). listening to someone speak, we are aware of the visceral embodied performance of self and other giving resonance to diverse interdisciplinary languages and layers of meaning. cognizant of aoki’s (2005) caution of the dangers of “becoming the language we speak” (p. 23), we incorporate his notion of active becomings — a layering of stories, voices, fragments, and traces which provide possibilities for dissonance and transformation and treat the self as relational and inherently multiple. interpreting and contextualizing the meanings of written, spoken and visual languages we explore how the life stories of immigrant educators evoke socio-cultural and diverse imaginaries. as we listen to ourselves and others, we are vigilant of the work of language and the histories, narratives, and meanings that it offers up. “[the telling is] not just a record but a filling out … a record that will supplement or supplant other accounts. this possibility suggests a definition of narrative as it functions in the historical and cultural imagination: not just a story but a further story, a missing story” (wood, 2012, p. 131). palimpsest as a methodological and collaborative research praxis over the past years, we have shared many stories with each other about teaching, pedagogy, teacher education, and its relation to the expansive world in which such concepts are intricately entangled. through our conversations—a spilling of stories—we have come to see that we share a deep commitment to interpretive approaches, that is, an interest in human inquiry, understandings, meanings, subjectivities, and identities as they arise in our interactions with others in the lived world. in our work together, we incorporate the practice of palimpsest, as a way to underscore our collaboration and communion in an intensely interpretive and hermeneutic way of knowing and acting in the world. palimpsest, from the greek palimpsests’ means to “scrape off or smooth again.” once a matter of economic and practical necessity, given the scarcity of writing material, palimpsest referred to the process in which a piece of parchment containing earlier writing was scraped again in order to allow for new writing and thought. inherently an incomplete process, the remnants of the earlier notation often remained visible through the new writing. however, this erasure and re-surfacing also had critical political and religious implications for marginalized groups whose cultural beliefs could be effaced and ultimately subverted. from a contemporary perspective, kaomea (2003) has illustrated the need “to delve beyond surface appearances” (p. 15). calling on derrida’s notion of sous rature (under erasure), kaomea argued for the “defamiliarizing [of] dominant narratives,” as a way to counter colonized and oppressive relations in schools and classrooms. our dialogic and recursive approach to writing and thinking together seeks to echo the way our narratives are continually layered next to and upon one another. to retain the phenomenon of the event/experience, we overwrite each other’s sections, drawing out new questions and inquiries, bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 5 complicating our own and each other’s trouble-free descriptions. accordingly, our process of inscription evokes the fragility of our own knowing and the tentativeness of our conclusions. as the greek practice of palimpsest involved “scraping and smoothing” parchments, we recognize how language opens meanings and creates possibilities for new layers of stories, voices, and understandings to emerge. referring to narrative inquiry in human science research, catherine kohler riessman (2008) noted the term narrative can refer to various written and visual works that overlap – a layering of “stories told by research participants (which are themselves interpretive), interpretive accounts developed by an investigator based on interviews and fieldwork observations (a story about stories), and even the narrative a reader constructs after engaging with the participant’s and investigator’s narratives” (p. 6). we recognize “stories can be described not only as narratives that have a sequential and temporal ordering, but also as texts that include some kind of rupture or disturbance in the normal course of events, some kind of unexpected action that provokes a reaction and/or adjustment” (defina, cited in reiessman, 2008, p. 6). understanding that grand narratives are constructed by overlapping stories, we want to explore how practicing palimpsest – layering cultural and life experiences of immigrants – can effectively “scrape” away and even erase dominant western narratives. early childhood education scholars and researchers have raised important questions about storytelling and early literacy (bjartveit, 2011; carr & lee, 2012; paley, 1981; rodari, 1996), race and identity (grieshaber & cannella, 2001; macnaughton & davis, 2009) and diversity and difference (gonzalez-mena, 2008; pacini-ketchabaw with nxumalo, 2010). scholars and educators pursuing these issues reconceptualize the role of storytelling in supporting language learning, opening intercultural polyphonic dialogue and building equitable relationships in ece settings. we draw on the interpretive and layered theoretical understandings of several scholars (aoki, 2005; gadamer, 2004; kearney, 2002), whose nuanced writing on the critical implications of liminalities, the fluidity of becoming, as well as the political and socio-cultural implications of narratives have assisted our own understandings and interpretations especially around how the language of immigration, trauma, loss, displacement, as literal experience is manifest and reconstituted through these life stories. the participants, all immigrants and living in canada for more than two years, had recently graduated from a canadian ece postsecondary program and were working as preschool teachers and daycare workers in various early childhood settings. utilizing an interpretive narrative approach that included listening to and recording the autobiographical accounts, carolyn met with each participant on two separate occasions and documented the educators’ responses to questions relevant to the lifeworld of school, culture, curriculum, and their immigrant experiences. at the first meeting, carolyn offered each participant a copy of artist shaun tan’s graphic novel the arrival (2006)ii – an immigrant’s story of arriving in a new land hoping that it might initiate conversations and elicit questions. tan’s fantastical, yet realistic, images provoked discussion between the researcher and participants as they explored and imagined the inbetweens of past/present, reality/fantasy, race/identity and cultures. notably, carolyn did not ask the participants specific questions relating to the illustrations and encouraged them to engage bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 6 with and freely interpret the artwork according to their own ideas and experiences. following kohler riessman (2000), we recognize that [a]lthough dehumanizing research practices persist, feminists and others in the social sciences have cleared a space for less dominating and more relational modes of interviewing, which reflect (and respect) participants ways of organizing meaning in their lives (devault, 1999). we have made efforts to give up power, and follow participants down their associative trails. (pp. 2-3) in reviewing the transcripts of these interviews, we have come to see how language – written, spoken, visual, and embodied not only defines but also reflects culture (peterson & coltrane, 2003) and the self, and expresses it through metaphor. relaying their auto-biographical stories, the research participants situated themselves between past and present events and, in so doing, each developed “a sense of [their self] as a narrative identity” (kearney, 2002, p. 4). moreover we noted how the conversation itself directed the participants. carolyn recorded that “[a]s the conversations took hold …we often lost track of the time…as our dialogue transported us to foreign lands, deep into the past and forward to the future” (field note, april 29, 2012, p. 4). away from objective research approaches, carolyn attempted to balance deep listening and observing with ongoing fluid adjustment and redirection, as she recorded in a field note following her interview with research participant, aiko: i felt tension or a kind of wall in-between us. i found myself repeating and rephrasing questions in order to draw out responses … i sensed not only in what she said but in her pauses that aiko was cautious about what she shared and how she responded to my questions. i doubted that her immigrant experiences were all positive as she described them, which points to my own engrained [normative western] assumptions that the immigrant story is one of pain and suffering – the “single” immigrant narrative. (transcription, may 1, 2012. p. 44) we argue that no essentializing human universals exist or as chimamanda adichie expressed: “the single [immigrant] story creates stereotypes, and the problem with stereotypes is not that they are untrue but that they are incomplete. they make one story become the only story” (2009, para. 24). rather than interpreting individual “cases,” we read a strong message of hope in the layered meaning of participants’ collective stories. hope is not only something we have as individuals but also it lives out in our encounters in and with humanity. practicing palimpsest erases and subverts western dominant narratives –what we continue to hope for and work toward (thompson & zizek, 2013). in the interviews, the action of uncovering truth [aletheia]— the event of concealment and unconcealment— contained in the transcriptions was arduous, time consuming, and demanded patience, empathy, and care. practicing palimpsest required “scraping and smoothing” reading and re-reading the transcriptions, analyzing the intercultural dialogue, remembering the moment of the encounter and remaining open to possible subverted meanings. we acknowledge palimpsest and storytelling as a research methodology that “pushes against the constraints of those traditions … in its explicit recognition of the use of the self as the primary research instrument bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 7 for documenting and interpreting the perspectives and experiences of the people and the cultures being studied” (lawrence-lightfoot & hoffman davis, 1997, pp. 13-14). away from the objective, pre-determined and static interview methodologies that are sometimes adhered to in educational research, we propose that storytelling as an element of narrative can be recognized as a legitimate form of research and classroom praxis. in layering personal narratives, researchers and participants interpreted their experiences and topics through multimodal languages and ultimately constructed new understandings and meanings about self and other (bjartveit & panayotidis, in press). educational researchers from a variety of fields have explored the possibilities inherent in using palimpsest as a metaphor, a theory, or a methodology for reading historiographies and other bodies of literature (diamond, arnold, & wearring, 1997; huyssen, 2003; kaomea, 2003; mcardle & piscitelli, 2002; powell, 2008; saunders, 2003). our contribution to the work on palimpsest in education is to highlight the ways in which palimpsest lends itself to a collaborative praxis in interviewing. layering stories of the self to understand identity and difference [e]very life is in search of a narrative…we all seek willy-nilly to introduce some kind of concord into the everyday discord and dispersal we find about us…in our own postmodern era of fragmentation …narrative provides us with one of our most viable forms of identity – individual and communal. (kearney, 2002, p. 4) working as a preschool teacher years ago, carolyn remembers her young students’ engagement and interest in stories and storytelling. she recalled when children imagined and told stories from the garden (bjartveit, 2011) and masterfully created characters with personality traits to which they related a mischievous squirrel, a bossy queen bee and a magical fairy, to name a few. through imaginary play and dialogue, the children layered their selves with the characters and constructed a different sense of identity while “trying on” various roles. one young boy, who against the wishes of his parents wanted to be a fairy, came to a different sense of his own identity by crossing and exploring gender roles. “self, in other words, is a story that is constantly being rewritten. the writing and rewriting of the narrative which is self is hermeneutical and cyclical in nature… self is a narrative which is constantly reinterpreted and rewritten by oneself” (kazmi, 1990, pp. 285 286). remembering how the children layered stories to understand identity and difference, carolyn related her personal story to the arrival, and envisioned the immigrant experience. inspired by tan’s visual poetry and the stories that participants told her, carolyn imagined her grandfather an immigrant from germany who arrived in canada in 1930. by placing a photograph of her ancestor between the pages of the graphic novel and sharing his story with the educators she interviewed, carolyn adopted the dual roles of researcher and participant. she became more than an empathetic listener and risked becoming known – an ontological exercise that involved opening herself up to others, exposing and “placing [or laying her/self] on the surface” (oed). in layering her story with the accounts of immigrant participants and tan’s story characters, the fragmented pieces of information that carolyn gathered about her grandfather from family members, record books, official documents, and photo albums pieced together differently and recreated the story of his arrival and adjustments to life in canada. embracing the complexity not bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 8 simplifying, reducing or ignoring the layers of multiple stories uncovered hidden meanings about her identity and others and re-invented the immigrants’ experiences. apart from coconstructing stories through the interpretation of visual, spoken, and written language(s), we believe that layering the self of researchers and participants can develop trust, open conversations, build relationships and exercise “compassionate knowing” (munro hendry, 2008, p. 24). when carolyn invited the participants to respond to tan’s illustrationsiii, interview questions, and conversations in visual, written and spoken languages, many of them chose to describe their ideas and experiences verbally and/or in written notes. jin, a music teacher from south korea, planned to write a song and create a storybook about her immigrant experiences. others talked about writing poems, or sketching/drawing whereas some participants said they were not “artistically inclined” and preferred to talk about their ideas. while many of the participants shared initial plans to create visual works, only sumiko, a participant from japan, drew a picture to represent her ideas. identity was a strong thread weaving through sumiko’s story and, following the interview, she gave carolyn her drawing depicting light and shadow – a metaphor representing how she had lost her identity in japan and in canada was trying to discover her/self [figure 1]. in the interviews, sumiko told carolyn she was struggling to understand how her culture influences her ideas and who she is. she was wrestling with her identity and wanted to focus on her/self rather than on cultural labels – specifically being japanese. in a field note (april 2, 2012, p. 4), carolyn described her conversations with sumiko as deep and painful: it is difficult for me to describe in words – the dialogue was rich, intense and raw. i felt like sumiko wanted to be honest and yet it was a strain at times for her to re-visit her lived experiences and to articulate her thoughts… her pauses were long and loaded and i included her expressions of “hmmmmm” and “uhhhh” in the transcription – indicators to me of her thoughtful moments and struggle. explaining her drawing, sumiko said that, although the central object does not change, shadows cast from it shift according to the direction and source of light. notably, the light represents, “environment, people, experiences, and culture” (transcription, april 25, 2012, p. 91) that influence and transform her identity, similar to the changing shadows in the drawing. when carolyn invited sumiko to further explain the metaphor specifically what changed the direction of the light and influenced her transformation she responded: s: oh for me [pause] moving – yes. but for me, the dynamics of people around me. [pause] but i’m still questioning myself that – [are] they really different from people in japan? people are people and i know that um there are many individual differences in each single, different person but am i just making an excuse or huh. [pause] i wasn’t able to create my own strong identity – this is what i’m feeling. why? c: in japan, you mean? s: in japan and even here maybe. i’m asking to myself, why? and maybe environment? but it’s an excuse and i’m blaming [pause] other people and something – hmmm. i just want to put the blame on something but not on me. it’s my responsibility to create my own life. it’s no one’s responsibility but it’s mine. so ... [pause] yes so why did i let othbjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 9 ers, environments or other factors um change my life or change me, myself? i didn’t need to let anything change me but something changes me and uh why is that? i don’t know. (transcription, april 25, 2012, pp. 91-92) figure 1: sumiko’s visual description of light and shadow as it relates to her cultural identity. bruner noted that “it is through narrative that we create and re-create selfhood, and self is a product of our telling and re-telling. we are… expressions of our culture. culture is replete with alternative narratives about what self is or might be” (2002, p. 86). sumiko articulated her own identity crisis by layering and imagining her/self as the main male protagonist in tan’s novel [figure 2]. tan’s drawing of the man struggling to understand a new language made an impression on sumiko. she said the immigrant character is frustrated about his inability to communicate and about losing his identity. she imagined the man knew who he was in his own country but when he came to the new land he no longer knew him/self. when carolyn asked sumiko if her experience is similar to the story character’s, she said that she lost her identity in japan and in canada continues to work out ideas about her/self (field note, april 25, 2012). sumiko related to the frustration and emotions represented in tan’s drawing: he’s so confused, worried, scared and he is frustrated because he wanted to say something but he was not able to say something. there is a gap between what he wants to say and what he is able to say. and uh he’s hopeless, frustrated because of lack of communication. and uh i think this page is the moment that his identity was taken away for the first time and he wants to prove it, he wants to prove his identity but he can’t and this is really scary to him ‘cause he is losing his identity. (transcription, april 24, 2012, p. 70) bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 10 figure 2: “[h]e sensed that he’s losing his own identity, i think. it’s really devastating, this is” sumiko (transcription, april 24, 2012, p. 70). apart from sumiko’s drawing, it was evident to us, in reviewing the interview transcriptions, that the visual was calling for words – asking or beckoning readers to place written text alongside tan’s illustrations. the post-it notes, many of which were written in point form, described immigrant stories of departure and arrival, family, emotions, adjusting to a new culture and identity [figure 3]. figure 3: the post-it note sumiko left on tan’s illustration (see figure 2) a trace of her/self and identity shilpy, a research participant from bangladesh, did not relate to the images in the arrival (2006) because she had few lived experiences to relate them to. shilpy emphasized that tan’s stories might be her mother’s or grandmother’s. although their experiences were not hers, they are bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 11 inscribed on her – especially the troubling accounts they told her about the war of independence in bangladesh during the 1970s. as shilpy looked at tan’s drawings she said, “i can’t explain because i have no language… it’s a kind of [a] story i know, telling something” (transcript, may 4, 2012, p. 68). shilpy verbally articulated her ideas and so we question why she said, “i have no language” and seemed lost for words. derrida (2000) stressed “what [we] don’t want to say or cannot, the unsaid, the forbidden, what is passed over in silence, what is separated off... all these should be interpreted” (derrida & dufourmantelle, 2000, p. 12). figure 4: “and this it’s a kind of story i know, telling something” shilpy (transcription, may 3, 2012, p. 68). shilpy left no post-it notes and expressed anxiety both in what she did and did not say about the illustrations. we believe the layers of visual and embodied languages her pointing gestures, sighs and silences were meaning/ful. having said this, we recognize that the process of layering may in itself be driven by western communication ideals and interpretations. this necessitates researchers to be self-aware conscious of dominant standards and beliefs, and open to immigrants’ diverse responses and modes of communication. we vacillate between our own stories and the participants’ accounts, recognizing that, in the past, we ourselves have misunderstood others based on wrongful interpretations of the stories they told. after kearney, we concur that “[t]he key is to let the other be other so that the self may be itself again…[o]ne of the best aids in this task is narrative understanding: a working-through of loss and fear by means of cathartic imagination and mindful acknowledgement” (kearney, 2003, p. 8). our literal and philosophical understanding of tan’s title the arrival exemplifies how interpretations differ and new meanings arrive in layering spoken, visual, and written stories. the arrival might refer to the immigrant experience of coming to a new land and/or to “the event” – the often-unpredictable coming of truth [aletheia]. however, who or what is arriving or coming? derrida said l’avenir refers to “someone who comes whose arrival is totally unexpected…. it’s the coming of the other when [we are] completely unable to foresee their arrival” (zeitgeist bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 12 films, 2002, 1:44). we recognize how, in relating to various illustrations and telling their stories, the participants “arrived at” different understandings of self and other and their lived experiences. ghiso and low (2013) emphasize that “‘arriving’ does not imply either an incremental shedding of one cultural identity in favour of another, or a static endpoint. rather… narratives showcase stories of struggle, loss, excitement and disjuncture, representing, through visual modalities, the nuance and contradiction of claiming transnational identities” (pp. 32-33). recognizing, too, that stories remembered are fragmented, we believe that some/thing true arrives through layering memories and accounts told in multimodal languages. jacques derrida explained his own resistance to storytelling: even when i confide things that are very secret i don’t confide them in the mode of a story. at times i provide certain signs, facts, dates but otherwise i don’t write a narrative. and so the question for me is the question of narration which has always been a serious question for me. i’ve always said i can’t tell a story. i’d love to tell stories but i don’t know how to tell them. and i’ve always felt that the telling is somewhat inadequate to the story i’d want to tell. so i’ve given up telling stories. i’ve just given up. (zeitgeist films, 2002, 33:45) if stories and the storytelling that ensues cannot be accurately told because events are forgotten or misrepresented and words /language misunderstood, we ask: is it better to remain silent and not tell them at all? here is where we take a turn from derrida. in recognizing that stories are incomplete not actual accounts but interpretations of life experiences we believe they must be told. the value of the “telling” is to come to an understanding about self, other, and events through language which "provides the mitte, the ‘medium’ or ‘middle ground,’ the ‘place’ where understanding…takes place” (gadamer, 2004, p. xvii). the continuous interplay of verbal, written, embodied, and visual languages one playing off of the other fill in missing pieces of narratives and accounts of events. layering stories told in multiple language modalities provided different meanings and deepened our understanding of the immigrants’ life-stories. recognizing difference and disrupting dominant western narratives in ece while interrogating master ece narratives and questioning “fixed representational forms of identity,” we agree with aoki that “identity-and differencemust always be understood relationally: identities with each other, against a background, in a context of contested meanings and possibilities” (smits, 2010, p. 16). per se, what does it mean to recognize difference in culturally diverse ece settings? secondly, “how can we articulate an explicitly intercultural ethic of dialogue?” (ganesh & holmes, 2013, p. 85). understanding how to “world” is in itself a multilayered concept and includes learning to be responsible, building relationships with others, negotiating interests, bringing others into our “common worlds” and practicing a “relational ethics” (taylor & giugni, 2012, p. 117). when carolyn invited participants to read the post-it notes left by others in the arrival, a type of intercultural polyphonic dialogue ensued. notably, participants spoke “from a fugal space ‘in between each other’ which is a communal space. they explore[d] an ‘interpersonal’ reality: a social reality that appears within the poetic image as if it were …aesthetically distanced, held bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 13 back, yet historically framed” (bhabha, 1996, p. 55). the participants’ strong interest in reading and writing post-it notes – traces and narratives of the self, related to tan’s illustrations was in itself note/worthy. the participants came together around shared communication – a dialogic context that is not between two selves but uses symbol (the post-it notes) as the other/self rather than a person. reading the notes, participant tina commented “we are one people in the real world and we feel the same things. we see the same things but we see them differently” (transcription, may 25th, 2012, p. 89). ultimately this “distanced” polyphonic dialogue interrupted the notion of a stereotypical “single” (adichie, 2009) or universal immigrant story and pointed to the participants’ unique and individual life experiences. now working as preschool teachers and childcare providers in canadian ece settings, immigrant participants observed and described childrearing and childcare practices that were different from their own. participant jin watched a caregiver at a daycare reprimand an african child, a new arrival in canada, for using her fingers to eat rice. jin commented that if the childcare provider had recognized and considered cultural differences, she might have allowed the child opportunities to learn about spoon feeding practices in western culture. instead, jin recalled hearing the caregiver comment to her co-worker: “oh their family doesn’t know how to use a fork and knives yet and she just grab the food like this – all over. she make a mess” (transcription, april 14, 2012, p. 38). tina was likewise troubled when she observed wastefulness and an excess of food and materials in the daycare where she works: “i would see lots of paper, recycled paper…everything was just too much! like full of toys, full of paper, full of food – they’d throw it away and…where i was coming from and the schools i was coming from [in zimbabwe] we grew up being resourceful” (transcription, may 25, 2012, p. 49). reading the participants’ accounts, we wonder how layering cultural ideas and understandings through dialogue might have created different outcomes to these experiences. veronica pacini-ketchabaw (2010) questions how “forces and intensities” that come together in dialogic encounters – when layers of life stories and cultures bump up against each othermight “be rearranged to create new movements and new arrangements… [and] slow down the forces that create binaries and centralisms and take them somewhere else where different arrangements would be intensified” (lenz taguchi, as cited in pacini-ketchabaw, 2010, p. 145). this requires educators to remain open to transcultural and contextual interpretations of language and narratives. diversity and difference should not be “interpreted as a technical problem to be fixed by our scientific gaze”, we recognize its critical importance in opening dialogue and coming to a “greater and deeper understanding” about self and other (panayotidis, 2011, p. 58). early childhood educators might also attempt to create spaces and opportunities for meaningful conversations and encounters to take place, so that relationships and communities can grow. while working as a preschool teacher, carolyn created a comfortable and welcoming space in the school for families to meet prior to and after program hours. as months passed, she noticed how the parents increasingly utilized the space and lingered there to talk, share ideas, and spend time together. carolyn specifically recalls how a family that had recently immigrated to canada from romania, established meaningful connections and friendships with other parents and children at the preschool. bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 14 educator maxine greene (1995) explained that “[d]emocracy… means a community that is always in the making. marked by an emerging solidarity, a sharing of certain beliefs, and a dialogue about others, it must remain open to newcomers, those too long thrust aside” (p. 39). we stress that further time and opportunities for dialogue are essential – children, parents, community members and educators should be invited to contribute and layer their diverse ideas on an on-going basis. we believe that inviting transcultural dialogue and building relationships in early childhood settings at all levels might serve to problematize dominant western early childhood discourses and connect educators, children and families in vital ways. it can potentially “world” a community and the curriculum, and create a pedagogical philosophy that acknowledges difference, diversity, and individuality. conclusion [w]e are surrounded by layers of voices…certain voices became silent and, hesitating to reveal themselves, conceal themselves. let us beckon these voices to speak to us, particularly the silent ones, so that we may awaken to the truer sense of teaching [and learning] that likely stirs within each of us. before we visit the place where the silent voices dwell, let us try to uncover layer by layer…from the surface to the place where teaching [and learning] truly dwells. (aoki, 2005, p. 188) in weaving together multiple layered narratives and our ideas about storytelling as classroom and research praxis, we hope to forge a deeper understanding of how the stories we tell can often depend on the people we are and want to be. such interrelations suggest to us that stories told and listened to are the wellsprings of life. while examining the always convoluted intersections between the self and the intercultural polyphonic dialogue and language that it may prompt, we seek to understand more fully aoki’s (2005) “zone of between” which serves to situate students and educators ontologically through the course of interpretation. we are, however, mindful of how what we speak, write, and create can reproduce worlds, understandings, assumptions, critiques, and possibly lead to colonialized or postcolonialized identities and subjectivities. we are critically attuned to the difficult and perplexing moments in teaching and learning alongside our students whether young children and youth in schools or adult learners in the postsecondary teacher education classroom. it is those difficult moments that unsettle us, cause us to worry, to wonder, and to reconsider what we thought we knew and perhaps importantly how we came to know. difficult moments are palpable, deeply residing in our bodies and producing uneasiness and discomfort. yet, as ann reynolds noted evocatively, “discomfort may be our only motivation to look harder at the agendas of pedagogical institutions and their devices, no matter how subtle. an assumption of universal appeal always masks a much more considered selectivity” (1995, p. 109). within this discomfort lies the possibility for critical teaching, a commitment to a rich curricula and inquiry-based teaching practice, which is apophatic; seeking to speak, write, and imagine the unspeakable and the unsaid. we argue for transcription (recording, writing, and interpreting) as a methodological practice of deep listening that incorporates all of the researchers’ senses and recognizes the rich and multiple modes of communication and language interpretations. as such, the notion of layering language, stories, and cultural understandings are interlaced through theoretical, methodological, and visual lenses. in interrupting interview protocols, we hope to further explore research practices that bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 15 include layering stories told in multimodal language(s), and cultural understandings that point to “a process of deep examination and penetration: an inquiry that is designed to uncover layers of mask and inhibition; a search for authenticity that is rich, ranging, and revelatory” (lawrencelightfoot & hoffmann davis, 1997, p. 139). language itself in its multiple modalities, layered with narratives, histories, and cultures potentially change our conceptions of relationality. in practicing palimpsest layering stories, including the participants and our own – and disrupting dominant western ece narratives, we encountered “layered voices” (aoki, 2005) that pointed us to different understandings about the “immigrant experience,” the connections between the self and other and what it means for culturally diverse teachers and students to live together in an always complex world. bios carolyn bjartveit is a phd candidate in educational studies in curriculum and learning and a sessional instructor at the werklund school of education, university of calgary, canada. her doctoral research focuses on the topics of teaching and learning and the complex intersections between the self (of students and educators) and the curriculum in culturally diverse early childhood education post secondary classrooms. cjbjartv@ucalgary.ca e. lisa panayotidis is professor and chair of educational studies in curriculum and learning at the werklund school of education, university of calgary, canada. she has written extensively on fine arts teacher education, historical thinking and consciousness, and curriculum theory and imagination. co-author of provoking conversations on inquiry in teacher education (2012, peter lang), her research has appeared in the journal of the canadian association for curriculum studies, media: culture: pedagogy, and journal of curriculum theorizing. elpanayo@ucalgary.ca references adichie, c. (october 7, 2009). transcript for chimimanda adichie: the danger of a single story. tedtalks, retrieved from http://dotsub.com/view/63ef5d28-6607-4fec-b906aaae6cff7dbe/viewtranscript/eng aoki, t. (2005). curriculum in a new key. the collected works of ted. t. aoki. mahwah, nj: lawrence erlbaum associates. bakhtin, m. (1981). discourse in the novel. in m. holquist (ed.), the dialogic imagination (c. emerson & m holquist, trans.). austin, tx: university of texas press. bee, h., & boyd, d. (2010). the developing child, (12th ed). boston, ma: pearson education. bhabha, h. (1996). culture’s in-between. in s. hall & p. du gay (eds.), questions of cultural identity (pp. 53-60). london, uk: sage. bjartveit, c. (2011). speaking the language of nature: reconceptualizing early literacy in telling the stories from the garden. canadian children, 36(2), 17-23. bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 16 bjartveit, c., & panayotidis, e. l. (in press). pointing to shaun tan’s the arrival and reimagining visual poetics in research. contemporary issues in early childhood education. bruner, j. (2002). making stories: law, literature, life. cambridge, ma: harvard university press. cannella, g. (2002). deconstructing early childhood education. social justice & revolution. new york, ny: peter lang. carr, m., & lee. w. (2012). learning stories. thousand oaks, ca: sage. carr, p., & lund, d. (2007). the great white north? exploring whiteness, privilege and identity in education. rotterdam, nl: sense. depalma, r. (2010). toward a practice of polyphonic dialogue in multicultural teacher education. curriculum inquiry, 40(3), 436-453. derrida, j., & dufourmantelle, a. (2000). of hospitality. stanford, ca: stanford university press. diamond, p., arnold, r., & wearing, c. (1997). an empathic inquiry into qualitative research: a palimpsest. the australian educational researcher, 24(3), 83-96. eppert, c. (2008). fear, (educational) fictions of character, and buddhist insights for an artsbased witnessing curriculum. in c. eppert & h. wang, cross-cultural studies in curriculum. eastern thought, educational insights (pp. 55-108). new york, ny: lawrence erlbaum associates. gadamer, h.g. (2004). truth and method (2nd ed.) (d.g. marshall & j. weinsheimer, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. ganesh, s., & holmes, p. (2013). positioning intercultural dialogue theories, pragmatics, and an agenda. journal of international and intercultural communication, 4(20), 81-86. ghiso, m.p., & low, d.e. (2013). students using multimodal literacies to surface micronarratives of united states immigration. literacy, 47,26-34. retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2012.00678.x/pdf gonzalez-mena, j. (2008). diversity in early care and education (5th ed.). new york, ny: mcgraw-hill. greene, m. (1995). releasing the imagination. essays on education, the arts, and social change. san francisco, ca: john wiley & sons. bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 17 grieshaber, s., & cannella, g. (eds.) (2001). embracing identities in early childhood education. diversity and possibilities. new york, ny: teachers college press. henning, k., & kirova, a. (2012). the role of cultural artefacts in play as tools to mediate learning, contemporary issues in early childhood, 13(3), 226-241. huyssen, a. (2003). present pasts: urban palimpsests and the politics of memory. redwood city, ca: stanford university press. kaomea, j. (2003). reading erasures and making the familiar strange: defamiliarizing methods for research in formerly colonized and historically oppressed communities. educational researcher, 32(2), 14-25. kazmi, y. (1990). on being educated in the west: the disruption in self as a narrative and authenticity and inauthenticity of self. studies in philosophy and education, 10, 281-295. kearney, r. (2002). on stories. new york, ny: routledge. kearney, r. (2003). strangers, gods and monsters. new york, ny: routledge. kearney, r. (2011). what is diacritical hermeneutics? journal of applied hermeneutics, article 1. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy59z90p5 kearney, r., & taylor, v. (2005). a conversation with richard kearney. journal for cultural and religious theory, 6 (2), 17-26. kohler riessman, c. (2000). analysis of personal narratives. retrieved from http://alumni.media.mit.edu/~brooks/storybiz/riessman.pdf kohler riessman, c. (2008). narrative methods for the human sciences. thousand oaks, ca: sage. lawrence-lightfoot, s., & hoffmann davis, j. (1997). the art and science of portraiture. san fransisco, ca: jossey-bass. macnaughton, g., & davis, k. (eds.) (2009). “race”and early childhood education. an international approach to identity, politics, and pedagogy. new york, ny: palgrave macmillan. mcardle, f., & piscitelli, b. (2002). early childhood art education: a palimpsest. australian art education, 25(1), 11-15. mckenna, j., & mcdade, t. (2005). why babies should never sleep alone: a review of the cosleeping controversy in relation to sids, bedsharing and breast feeding. pediatric respiratory reviews, 6, 134-152. bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 18 munro hendry, p. (2008). engendering wisdom. listening to kuan yin and julian of norwich. in c. eppert & h. wang (eds.) cross-cultural studies in curriculum. eastern thought, educational insights, (pp. 207-226). new york, ny: lawrence erlbaum. online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=lay&searchmode=none pacini-ketchabaw, v. (ed.) (2010). flows, rhythms, & intensities of early childhood education curriculum. new york, ny: peter lang. pacini-ketchabaw, v., & nxumalo, f. (2010). a curriculum for social change: experimenting with politics of action or imperceptibility. in v. pacini-ketchabaw (ed.) flows, rhythms, & intensities of early childhood education curriculum (pp. 133-154). new york, ny: peter lang. paley, v. (1981). wally’s stories. conversations in the kindergarten. cambridge, ma: harvard university press. panayotidis, e.l. (2011). thinking/teaching in multiple tongues. the interdisciplinary imagination. journal of curriculum theorizing, 27(1), 48-63. peterson, e., & coltrane, b. (2003). culture in second language teaching. center for applied linguistics. washington, dc: eric clearninghouse on languages and linguistics. retrieved from http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/digest_pdfs/0309peterson.pdf powell, k.a. (2008). remapping the city: palimpsest, place, and identity in art education research. studies in art education: national art education association: a journal of issues and research, 50(1), 6-21. rodari, g. (1996). the grammar of fantasy. an introduction to the art of inventing stories. new york, ny: teachers and writers collaborative. saunders, l. (2003). flying, writing poetry and doing educational research. british educational research journal, 29(2), 175-187. smits, h. (2010). “the uncannily correct and the elusively true”: a conversation with ted aoki. one world, 42(2), 12-20. tan, s. (2006). the arrival. new york, ny: arthur a. levine books an imprint of scholastic inc. taylor, a., & giugni, m. (2012). common worlds: reconceptualising inclusion in early childhood communities. contemporary issues in early childhood, 13(2), 108-119. thompson, p., & zizek, s. (2013). the privatization of hope. durham, nc: duke university press. bjartveit & panayotidis journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 5 19 wood, m. (2012). the other case. daedalus, 141(1), 130–138. yang, g.l. (november 11, 2007). stranger in a strange land. the new york times. retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/books/review/yangt.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print[cb1] zeitgeist films (producer) (2002). derrida [youtube video] retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctcpwjcc6co i although some western researchers argue in favor of parents co-sleeping with infants, the prevailing western dominant discourse remains – babies should not sleep in adult beds. mckenna and mcdade (2005) note that “there are many good reasons to insist that the definitions of different types of co-sleeping and bedsharing be recognized and distinguished…co-sleeping at the least in the form of roomsharing especially with an actively breast feeding mother saves lives, is a powerful reason why the simplistic scientifically inaccurate and misleading statement ‘never sleep with your baby’ needs to be rescinded, wherever it is published’ (p. 134). ii we would like to thank shaun tan and lothian books / hachette australia for permission to reproduce images from the arrival (2006). some reviewers have suggested that tan’s work exhibits and perhaps glorifies the complexities of immigration, creating a heroic ‘single’ story or liberal multicultural discourse of success. in a personal e-mail written to carolyn, tan wrote that he was intentional in this approach. he noted: “i … hope that my book adds a sense of narrative coherence to memories of real experience, that it in some way elevates the migrant experience beyond a set of day-to-day chaotic problems, and that it can be seen as something profound and even heroic” (personal correspondence, 07/01/2013). furthermore, new york times critique, gene luen yang (2007) described how tan’s graphic depictions fit the universal narrative of the immigrant’s arrival in america: “[the protagonist] sets up residence in a city that…resembles new york’s historically ethnic neighborhoods. by borrowing american imagery to communicate an otherwise universal story, tan highlights just how central the immigrant experience is to the way america defines itself”. iii in a forthcoming paper (bjartveit & panayotidis) we expand more fully on how the research participants translated their immigrant experiences through imagining and interpreting illustrations in shaun tan’s (2006) graphic novel, the arrival. microsoft word moules editorial.docx corresponding author: nancy j moules, rn, phd email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics october 27, 2018 ãthe author(s) 2018 editorial: watching my mother die – subjectivity and the other side of dementia nancy j moules & andrew estefan preamble: on subjectivity within research traditions, the construct of “subjectivity” is limited and contentious. subjectivity is often associated with the “personal” in ways that enable it to be diminished or reduced. a reductive perspective of subjectivity means that it is commonly understood as the realm of “personal opinions, assumptions, interpretations, and beliefs” as opposed to the more “objective” and, arguably lauded “observation of measurable facts” (https://www.diffen.com/difference/objective_vs_subjective). there is an inherent assumption embedded in critiques of subjectivity: if something is measured, it is fact; if something is felt, believed, or interpreted, it is not. qualitative research has been criticized for being too personal, too subjective (greenhalgh et al., 2016). research that focuses on experiences engages interpretation to make meaning of those experiences. quantitative research engages measurement to make meaning of phenomena. whereas the tools of the quantitative researcher are seen as a more reliable basis for articulation of “facts,” the interpretations of the hermeneutic researcher cannot (and should not) be measured in the same way. “the theory that everything is a matter of interpretation is called hermeneutics…there are no uninterpreted facts of the matter. every matter of fact is a matter of the interpretation that picks out the facts” (caputo, 2018, pp. 3-4). where this becomes problematic is that the worth placed on the different tools and practices of researchers means they are valued differently. hermeneutic research is easily reduced and dismissed as subjective accounts, and therefore not trustworthy or dependable. moules & estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 3 2 addressing this issue seems to be an ongoing challenge that warrants attention (moules, venturato, laing, & field, 2017). subjectivity is a complex phenomenon and a misused term. the philosophical nuances of subjectivity are overlooked and ignored when it is reduced to simply mean “opinion,” or “experience.” although subjectivity incorporates both opinion and experience, it is also neither of these things. some philosophical ideas, such as personalism (for e.g.) reveal or suggest that subjectivity is, indeed, intersubjectivity because of the relational nature of humans. subjectivity must, then, have an external referent. can subjectivity qua subjectivity, therefore, ever be known? personalism also further troubles the idea of subjectivity because, to other “people” we are also objects. what, then, is the nature and experience of the object-subject? although we are not seeking to answer that question in this paper, we recognize that asking it is a challenge to common assumptions about subjective experience. “hermeneutics is the theory that the distinction between facts and interpretation bears closer scrutiny…no matter how loudly you proclaim you are just sticking to the facts, you are only raising the volume of your own interpretations” (caputo, 2018, p. 4). caputo’s words, here, remind us that subjectivity—the experience of self— is nested within and among our action in the world. human subjectivity informs our simple choice of what to eat for breakfast; it also informs the uptake of objectivist and constructionist thought. subjectivity is contentious because, in neoliberal, instrumentalist contexts (such as the professions), singular, subjective experience is perceived as lacking validity as a source of truth. subjectivity is, though, a form of becoming. for some theorists, like marcuse, subjectivity is the cultivation of radical, resistive subjectivities. in this way, subjective is not just “is,” but is shifting, and always forthcoming: a rich site for inquiry. take, also, ideas like bildung – the education within and through culture. bildung makes subjectivity more than simple opinion or the way the “other” sees it. subjectivity can be owned and named, we can articulate a self that engages with, and appraises, a world, just as others are at liberty and able to critique the existence of that self. the transaction here implies something beyond subjective opinion, but rather a negotiation of self, knowledge, and understanding between self and world. these conversations are not expressions of a solely subjective state, but an applied debate in which ontological and epistemological tensions are played out in both generative and constraining ways. when considering how it is, as people in the world, that we know, even apparently “subjective” judgments are problematic. taste, for example, is an aesthetic consideration. taste is the subjective experience of pleasure or displeasure; a person either likes something or they do not. people are, however, also conditioned to find some things pleasurable (a nice latte for example), and other things displeasing (like the smell of durian). the actual physical or physiological response of the body to certain stimuli is precisely that, a biological response that might contribute to a sense of subjectivity, but biology is not subjectivity in and of itself. the fact that around 10% of the population possess a gene that makes cilantro taste like soap is not a singular truth grounded in either objectivity (10% have the gene) or subjectivity (the experience and appraisal of cilantro is a negative one). therefore, an exploration of the nature and conditions of pleasure is needed in order to explore human experience. the exploration and the finding transcend the limits of moules & estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 3 3 subjectivity as it is commonly understood. one might argue that the limits of science are similarly transcended in such a venture. the arguments that things (like findings in qualitative research) are “subjective” are based on superficial engagement with what subjectivity means. even if a singular person can be known as a subject with subjective experiences, it cannot by extension just be assumed that what a person says or otherwise expresses, or how they act, is subjective. for some theorists (consider psychoanalytic feminism, for example), subjectivity is always constituted. that is to say, it is of something and that something cannot be ignored, reducing subjectivity to a matter of taste, preference, or disconnected independence of mind over context. finally, the boundaries of subjectivity are cultural: the degree to which we experience ourselves as subjective entities is not stable across culture or context. as a result, the reducing of complex expressions of being or presence in the world, as well the meaning-making practices in which people engage, to opinion or anecdote is both naïve and a loss of potential to enrich how connections are made between people in their respective worlds. this editorial is about personal accounts of interwoven universal human experiences of loss, mortality, and grief. though one writes within the “limit situation” (george, 2017), the writing can be interpretively linked to the world – a world which is not purely “my own” but intersects others’ experiences so that it becomes recognizable and, in that sense, communal. this is at the heart of hermeneutics: a sense of recognizability and kinship. george’s (2017) beautiful article was in response to beamer’s (2017) and moules (2017) reflections of grief and loss but it was also about his experience of the loss of his father. this editorial is continuing the conversation. in hermeneutics, one’s experience is often a point of departure either as something to interpret or something that changes our interpretation of things (k. sweet, personal communication, july 25, 2018). in continuing this conversation of loss, mortality, and grief, moules takes on the experience of dementia and the limit situation of memory in the context of dementia. in watching someone experience dementia, there are moments of connection, lucidity, and recall, watching as things become altered (at best), attacked, and finally lost. as moules’ mother succumbs to the dementia that has claimed and robbed her, we are clearly aware that dementia is not suffered in the singular. moules, too, is suffering its claim and its theft of her mother and this experience is much more than “just subjective.” “if we truly understand what an interpretation is – which is what we do in hermeneutics – we would never say ‘just a matter of interpretation’” (caputo, 2018, p. 14). the other side of dementia i (moules) am watching my mother die. this is hard but not as hard as it is to watch her suffering in her dying – a suffering that dementia has imposed. i lose her over and over again every day. rarely now are there glimpses of my mom. i look deep into her eyes and cannot find her and she cannot find me either a deeper sorrow and suffering for her a deeper loss. dying is not such a bad thing. suffering is. moules & estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 3 4 george (2017) reminded us of the limit situation of memory in grieving and i watch the betrayal of memory as dementia, against our will, robs her of her fight to hold on to what and who she knows, just as she knows she is losing all of it. there is a past that is being lost here, not just her past but my own as well, a past connected to others in our lives. i wrote the following in 2009 for my mother and her two sisters, as well as for my cousins. i read it at the funeral of my mom's eldest sister in 2010. our mothers’ kitchen tables we grew up lingering around the tables in our mothers’ kitchens. in our times together as families, our mothers, three sisters, cooked for us all, and then gathered together in the kitchen to do the dishes; simply a disguise to mark the work that had to be done… but really claiming the place where they could connect alone. i remember us as kids, hanging around, not really helping, but mostly wanting to catch a scent of something secret. in these curiously sacred, yet mundane times, we learned from our mothers how to move seamlessly from laughter to tears, teasing to supporting, listening to telling. we learned what it is to be connected, to be loyal to family. we learned how to love. we hung around hoping to catch a tidbit of gossip, a nuance of sex, a glimpse at the laughter that transformed their lives from minutia to perfection. but mostly we stayed to see who we would become, what we had waiting for us. we stayed to see the almost inexplicable moments when they were just themselves in a way with each other that no one else knew. in these moments, they were not mothers or wives. they were sisters. we grew up lingering around our mothers in the moments when they moved from being mothers to girls; to women who, over years of experiences and love and loss, still found something to laugh about. we grew up with the hope that we too would find tables that were strong enough to hold up such rich history and grounding trust that laugher would always be found, that teasing meant love, and that family is heart. we were well-fed at our mothers’ kitchen tables. my mom was able to attend that funeral and then she had the 5th of surgeries for her pituitary tumour – a craniotomy this time. i started to lose her then. dementia is a master thief; it is moules & estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 3 5 stealthy at times, bold at others. it slips in quietly and proclaims itself loudly. this kind of insidious loss does not happen cleanly, and the tables begin to turn at some point. resetting the kitchen table the table has changed she can’t see it. he can’t hear it. she is no longer the person she thought she was and then she believes she has lost me as well as herself. i have to dig deep to find her. but there are moments when she shows… i make a random joke and she gets it. he doesn’t. the food gets worse; the meal is harder; there is less laughter. and i leave to come back to my own home realizing i miss her. and once again, see nuances and foreshadowing of what i am to become the set table that awaits me. my father died last year (moules, 2017), and my mother did well enough on her own until january 2018. then quickly it was long term care and a very rapid decline deep into dementia, such that she can no longer talk and she is receiving total nursing care. she knows who i am, but it is a limit situation of memory that has betrayed her and left me bereft before she has died. she is dying and i try to grasp george’s (2017) limit situation that gadamer invokes it give me comfort in his words of memories that are “inexhaustible in their significance” (p. 3), and how i am charged to carry the memory on my own: “the world is gone; i must carry you” (derrida, 2005, p. 141, citing paul celan). i think too of my friend, heather, who lost her daughter, danielle, last year on september 26, and my other friend, janice, who lost her son, jordan, last year on december 1, and the memories they carry of worlds gone. “the infinite task posed by the dead” (george, 2017, p. 1) is as limitless as are our efforts to understand (gadamer, 1960/2003). grief, like life, involves a radical and resistive subjectivity (sebba, 2012). grief is not just sadness, but sometimes it is relief; there is freedom with loss; there is laughter with tears, or as crist suggested “as soon as a newborn child feels the first touch of air it falls to crying. the sun must shine upon it for well nigh forty days before it starts to laugh. oh in this world, tears predominate over laughter” (crist, 2018, pp. 7-8, citing gadamer, 1996, p, 153, citing the poetry of friedrich von logau). during her life, my mother resisted being “the good minister’s wife.” she was, at times subversive and, for a woman of her time she may have been thought of as radical, albeit quietly and with careful purpose. recently, i have come to understand that even had she not resisted being the good minister’s wife, she could not have laid claim to such an moules & estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 3 6 experience; some of the women of my father’s church can still not let go of their story of her as an unfitting minister’s wife. as her memories fail, my mother occupies a different resistive and radical subjectivity: she is the “i” without an “i.” this is not a simple subjectivity; it is being, becoming, resisting, and, ultimately, succumbing. we can set the loveliest of tables and we can invite the most loved of guests, but we cannot predict how well the meal will go we can only do the best setting we can as we carve out the futures for which we can only hope. postscript thelma irene moules died at 1215 a.m., september 1, 2018. we miss her. references beamer, k. (2018). and coyote howled: listening to the call of interpretive inquiry. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 10. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/article/view/53317/pdf caputo, j.d. (2018). hermeneutics: facts and interpretation in the age of information. london, uk: penguin random house uk. crist. a. (2018). a hermeneutic approach to pain: gadamer on pain, finitude, and recovery. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 10. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/article/view/53341/pdf derrida, j. (2005). rams: uninterrupted dialogue – between two infinities, the poem. sovereignties in question. new york, ny: fordham university press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/2003). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.; j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (1996). the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age (j. gaiger & n. walker, trans.). stanford, ca: stanford university press. moules & estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 3 7 george, t. (2017). grieving as limit situation of memory: gadamer, beamer, and moules on the infinite task posed by the dead. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 11. retrieved from https://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/163/pdf greenhalgh, t., annandale, e., ashcroft, r., barlow, j., black, n., bleakley, a., …ziebland, s. (20160. an open letter to the bmj editors on qualitative research. the bmj, 352, 1-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i563 moules, n.j. (2017). editorial: grief and hermeneutics: archives of lives and conflicted character of grief. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 1. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/article/view/53316/pdf moules, n.j., venturato, l., laing, c.m., & field, j.c. (2017). is it really “yesterday’s war”? what gadamer has to say about what gets counted. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 1. retrieved from https://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/140/pdf sebba, f. (2012). testing the limit: derrida, henry, levinas, and the phenomenological tradition (s. barker, trans.). stanford, ca: stanford university press. microsoft word williamsonpaulcorrectedproof.docx corresponding author: john williamson email: wjwillia@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics october 30, 2012 the author(s) 2012 the level playing field: unconcealing diploma exam accommodation policy w. john williamson and w. james paul abstract the authors, using a specific exemplar of standardized high-stakes testing and testing accommodations for learners with diagnosed disabilities in a canadian province, open up, for conversation and critique, the myth of the accommodations metaphor of “leveling the playing field.” by utilizing disabilities studies perspectives and literature, alternative interpretive readings of commonplace accommodations practices, as well as the experiential data of one of the author’s experiences managing exam accommodations at the school level, the authors critique the myth of reasonable, fair and equitable learner accommodations for those high schools facing standardized exit examinations. they also offer suggested alternative ways forward that they believe reconceptualize practices associated with framing accommodations for all learners and not just those deemed to have educational disabilities. when all learners are offered, without prejudice, diverse ways of demonstrating their learning, knowing, and achievement, then all students are engaged on level playing fields. keywords accommodations, alberta education, diploma exams, disability studies, gadamer, heidegger, level playing field 1my first experience with the concept of academic accommodation on diploma exams (mandatory exit exams alberta’s students are required to write) came twelve or so years ago when a colleague in counselling helped a student with a physical disability in my homeroom group apply to alberta education for extended time on his upcoming diploma examinations. the physical disability was due to a genetic condition that had caused the congenital amputation of some of his fingers. his application was initially rejected because his diagnosis was too old. my colleague helped williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 2 arrange for the student to see a physician who could verify that this condition was still disabling to the enterprise of writing, or, perhaps, we mused in sarcastic hyperbole, to verify that his lost fingers had not grown back since the last diagnosis. my colleague told me she was very tempted to send a picture along to accompany the more recent diagnosis in her letter of appeal. in 2012, 55,361 diploma examinations were written by students completing grade 12 courses in the province of alberta. these standardized tests are weighted at 50% of the students’ course grades in their grade 12 core subjects english language arts, mathematics, social studies and the sciences (alberta education, 2012). alberta education (2011) states the following reasons for these exams: • to certify the level of individual student achievement in selected grade 12 courses; • to ensure that province-wide standards of achievement are maintained, and • to report individual and group results. (p.1) coming at the end of their high school careers, in courses that are required both for graduation from high school and, often, as prerequisites for post-secondary pathways students hope to embark on, these exams are the very epitome of “high-stakes testing.” for students who have been supported in the classroom through differentiated instruction, including students with diagnosed disabilities, the prospect of writing these standardized exams under rigidly controlled testing conditions is daunting. focusing illustratively on some specific, diagnosable disabilities reveals some of the barriers to successful completion the exams would pose under regular conditions. for students with visual disabilities, standard print versions of the exams would obviously be inaccessible, but this is also true to some degree for students with diagnosed disabilities related to reading whose ability to interpret text would be hindered by their being asked to silently read some of the lengthy and complex exam booklets. the rigid time limits may also pose an unreasonable barrier for students with a variety of exceptionalities including slow processing speeds, physical disabilities related to writing, mental health issues and attention deficit/hyperactive disorder (adhd). these students need more time, either because it takes them longer to perform the academic tasks the exams required or because much of their writing time is inevitably lost to distraction or worry. the potential barriers that the standardized assessments under regular conditions pose to students with disabilities are a problem for the testers as well as the students. it is both an ethical concern in the sense that these barriers hinder the access to achievement opportunities for the students and a validity threat to anyone hoping to interpret data from these tests as they make it unclear whether a student’s performance on a particular assessment represented his or her actual mastery of course outcomes or only a shadow of what he or she was capable of (alberta education, 2006; webber, aitken, lupart, & scott, 2009). alberta education has formulated a comprehensive “response” system to address the potential barriers named above and to provide for reasonable accommodations for students writing diploma examinations to attempt to ensure that the diploma exams are administered equitably. this system is administered by the “special cases and accommodations division” of alberta education’s learner assessment branch. the concept of accommodation, as defined by alberta education, is important here. an alberta education (2006) “best learning practices” document entitled williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 3 “identifying student needs” defines accommodation as follows: an accommodation is a change or alteration in the regular way a student is expected to learn, complete assignments, or participate in classroom activities. accommodations include special teaching or assessment strategies, equipment or other supports that remove, or at least lessen, the impact of a student’s special education needs. the goal of accommodations is to give students with special education needs the same opportunity to succeed as other students. (p. 1) in the case of the province of alberta’s diploma exams, accommodations are available to help ensure that students with disabilities are treated fairly include the following: • audio cd versions of the exams; • extra writing time; • a scribe to record student responses; • large-print versions of the exams; • braille versions of the exams. (alberta education, 2011, p.12) the special cases and accommodations division, then, clearly articulates the principles that guide the provision of these learner accommodations claiming that the goal of accommodation is not to optimize performance but to level the playing field (emphasis added) by removing obstacles to performance that are inequitable. consequently, accommodations are neither intended nor permitted to: • alter the nature of the construct being assessed by an examination; • provide unfair advantage to students with disabilities or medical conditions over students taking examinations under regular standardized conditions, or • compensate for knowledge or skill that the student has not attained. (p.12) on this note, as illustrated in the anecdote at the start of this paper, the special cases and accommodations division requires various forms of proof to legitimate the status of students as having a disabilities. students with formal special education disability codes are required to document their codes and provide proof that they are consistently using the requested accommodations in classroom assessment. students with disabilities not recorded in the alberta education coding system need to provide formal diagnoses and proof of consistent use of the accommodations (alberta education, 2011). this approach seems thorough and balanced on a first reading. students with disabilities are not patronized with excessive help and do not receive unfair advantages over other students. they are simply held accountable for demonstrating their knowledge of the curriculum through means appropriate to their diverse learning needs. i can speak to the tangible relief many students and teachers i work with seem to feel knowing that going into these important assessments that students writing diploma exams will have the use of the accommodations they require. i can also speak to the impressions i have gathered over years of practice as to the efficiency and consistency with which the alberta special cases and accommodations division processes the accommodations applications and their willingness to work collaboratively when applications for accommodations were lacking. instead of rejecting these applications with no chance of appeal, they have often worked patiently to help me properly document students’ exceptionalities and proof of prior uses of accommodations so that many of the cases that were initially turned down were often eventually accepted. within the closed system of their own rules and procedures, special cases williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 4 and accommodations division often acts, from my observations, with professionalism, consistency, patience, and goodwill and this work undoubtedly benefits many diverse learners facing these high-stakes tests. as suggested in my example, however, despite the apparent successes i have encountered with this process of accommodation for diploma testing purposes, i have observed some problems as well. students who are eligible to receive accommodations, and who i feel would clearly benefit due the difficulties they experience, often refuse them. they refuse accommodations actively by saying they are not interested or sometimes, it seems, they refuse accommodations more passively through persistent failure either to obtain the necessary signatures from parents and teachers or to turn in the sections of the applications they are responsible for in time to meet the provincial deadlines. instead of being grateful for the accommodations, some coded students even seem resentful when i bring up the issues of their disabilities and the recommended accommodation for these disabilities, though, of course, i have no choice but to use disability labels. they are the currency required to obtain accommodations. the process of applying for accommodations is cumbersome, involving on my part the distribution, completion, gathering and faxing of hundreds of pages of documentation to special cases and accommodations every semester. time i spend engaged in this enterprise is time taken away from directly helping students with disabilities and other struggling students with their coursework. classroom teachers, who are an important part of the application team in the sense that they are required both to provide similar accommodations during classroom assessment and to work with the student to document the use of these accommodations, often seem resentful, too, not necessarily of accommodating the students but of the bureaucratic process. teachers who tend not to use strictly timelimited tests with students and/or who often read test questions out loud to students who are struggling to understand them are confused as to what constitutes a provable use of an accommodation in a diversified classroom where flexible assessment practices are neither formally announced as a departure from the norm nor limited to a limited set of eligible students, and the documents outlining the process of applying for accommodations (alberta education, 2011) provide no guidance on this. on the topic of eligibility, i often end up having to explain, with some difficultly, to students who are struggling in their classes and feel they might benefit from accommodations on their diploma exams, or teachers who are advocating for struggling students, why they too are not eligible for accommodations. actually, to explain this question from the apparent perspective of learner assessment/special cases is not difficult at all; for students with diagnosed disabilities, some aspects of the exams, such as time limits or the requirement to read silently, form unreasonable barriers that interfere with the assessment. for students deemed normal, even if they are struggling students who are thought normal, based only on a lack of a diagnosis to support the need for accommodation, the same aspects of the exam (silent reading, strict time limits) remain part of the curricular assessment and cannot be altered. doing so would give them an unfair advantage over other students. this, however, is not an intuitively satisfactory explanation to offer to students, parents or teachers and it starts to look even shakier if one questions the validity of educational labelling in the context of the ongoing controversies and definitional flux in the medical/psychological fields that inform the process (aaron, 1997; bienstock & harper, 2011; hacking, 1995; klassen, 2002; winzer, 2009). the claims to justice this policy makes also suffer whenever one simply wonders if there are, possibly, other ways of looking at williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 5 the needs of struggling students than through the lens of disability (clifford, friesen, & jardine, 2008; jardine, 2012). these concerns all coalesce into the question of whether or not the current policies of accommodation do enough to make diploma examinations a just experience for students who require them in order to be fairly assessed by the exams. a possible source of the resentment and confusion may have to do with a model/theory of disability that seems, quite clearly, to dominate the accommodations process but that has recently been frequently and openly challenged as an inappropriate way of interpreting disability or as a rubric to guide work with students with disabilities (alberta education, 2009; dunn, 2010; hibbs & pothier, 2005). the individual deficit model that special cases and accommodations division continues to use to determine which students are suitable applicants for accommodations, while once the dominant discourse in special education (winzer, 2009), has recently been criticized by stakeholders in special education as well as disability studies scholars as demeaning and exclusionary to individuals labelled as disabled and oblivious to the role of institutions in co-creating disabilities through exclusionary policy, stereotyping and the erection of unnecessary barriers (danforth & gabel, 2006; dunn, 2010; hibbs & pothier, 2005). critics note that despite the veneer of objectivity and scientific certainty with which documents such as the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (task force for dsm iv, 2000) and educational documents such as the alberta special education coding criteria manual (2010) describe disability as an individualized disorder, the social reality of disability is much more complicated than this. lest this concern seem excessively constructivist, it bears emphasizing that disability studies does not deny the reality that individuals have impairments that impact their lives, including their lives as students; rather, it sets out to critique what it claims to be dominant framings of these impairments as overarching, defining flaws or defects in individuals and the related social practices that disclose impairments through these negative framings (hibbs & pothier, 2005). it may be helpful to view this difference in perspectives hermeneutically, from a heideggerian (1962) understanding of “unconcealment” as well. as heidegger described in being and time, in a “clearing” (p. 133), a translator’s footnote encourages us to understand this in a literal sense as a space in the woods offering apparently unobstructed visibility of a thing, a thing may well be unconcealed or revealed but it still appears to us in a certain way that conceals other ways it may appear to us. in the “clearing” of the deficit model, in which people with disabilities have appeared or been disclosed as bearing individualized defects, “useful” technical knowledge has, admittedly, emerged about the nature of various impairments and about which accommodations might best assist people with these impairments. the enterprise of special education in general and, specific to this example, the process of diploma exam accommodation, depends on this knowledge (alberta education, 2006; winzer, 2009). other essential truths, however, are concealed by this disclosure, namely, the phenomenon of the discursive renaming/re-blaming of the institutional failure to be open, inclusive and convivial with a student who appears to learn differently as an individual defect solely lodged in the mind/body of the student (hibbs & pothier, 2005; jardine, 2012). the level playing field a closer examination of special cases and accommodation’s metaphor of the level playing field provides a hermeneutic unconcealing of the alberta education accommodation poliwilliamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 6 cy. seeming ostensibly in this case to indicate the state of fair and reasonable competition where no advantage is granted to either side “normal” or “disabled” learner -, this phrase “level playing field” has been used so often in conversations about ensuring equal competitive opportunities in a variety of contexts that it is easy to overlook its various foundational assumptions and associations. a very early use of the concept can be found in christianity’s bible, in the following piece of tactical advice: and the servants of the king of syria said unto him, their gods are gods of the hills; therefore they were stronger than we; but let us fight against them in the plain, and surely we shall be stronger than they. (1 kings 20:23, king james 2000 version) it is interesting to note that, in this quotation, the level playing field concept is not used as an invocation of fairness but as a strategic advantage that one side is seeking out over another in a test of even higher stakes than diploma exams, life and death combat. this meaning may linger as a reminder of the many ways this metaphor, which is now most often related to fairness, can still be used strategically. one might invoke ideas of fairness in order to gain advantage. notwithstanding this possibility, the level playing field metaphor with its implied imagery of sporting competitions where the levelness of the playing surface is of import tends to evoke notions of “fair play.” it also suggests the expectation that fair play is ensured by some sort of outside arbiter, a referee of one kind or another to hold everyone playing accountable to standards of play. in some ways, this metaphor does speak powerfully to the desire of, and for, a marginalized person to be included equally with, but not patronized or given advantage over, the normative group from which he or she was originally set apart in some field of endeavour. a discourse of moderation towards the more privileged other reassures that the marginalized party is asking for no more than fairness. the applicability of this notion of “level playing field” needs to be questioned in the context of the sufficiency of accommodation policies in levelling the playing field that is the diploma exam experience. “the level field?” the first notion that might be highlighted lest the frequent use of this phrase dulls the senses is that, in the present context, it is a metaphor equating the imposition of high-stakes tests on students with competition in a rulegoverned sport. the image of a field harkens to pastoral settings, in which members of a privileged leisure class partake in amateur sporting, such as games of croquet, cricket, or lawn bowling, or tennis. these participants attend in luxuriant solidarity to the rules of fair play that govern the gaming enterprise at play. competition is rightful and worthwhile, and it is assumed with the wilful naivety of class privilege that, even when the stakes are higher, the competition will be orderly and sporting. still, despite the façade of fairness the metaphor breaks down in a variety of ways when applied to high school high-stakes testing. first of all, aside from opting out of the widespread strong societal expectation of high school completion and, for many, the hope of advancing to some form of postsecondary education, the participants in this particular “educational sport” have no choice but to compete – and, to compete well. more apt comparisons than gentle sporting might be made to the privileged spectator/coerced participant relationship in sports of kings such as horse racing or gladiatorial combat. perhaps the recent dystopia novel and film, the hunger games (collin, 2008), in which working class adolescents were compelled to partake in “to the death” combat for the entertainment of a privileged class might also be a better williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 7 metaphor. while many would agree that competition is an integral aspect to the evolution of human experience, its value as a central theme of the educational enterprise is contestable. discourses related to high-stakes testing including “level playing field” uncritically advances competition, between students, between teachers and between school districts as an unequivocally positive phenomenon that will help ensure, in a (neo)classical liberal, capitalistic/marketing sense, quality education for all (gorlewski, porfilio, & gorlewski, 2012; graham & neu, 2004; kohn, 2000). a marxist reading of gladiatorial combat would point out that, other than earning the privilege to survive for another day, the gladiatorial combatant does not even really reap the fruits of his own victory. similarly, while the diploma exam writer’s transcript is certainly enhanced by a successful performance, these exams too speak of an alienation of labour. in terms of the exam as product, the student does not really choose to make it or how to make it and the fruits of the academic labour are certainly used for a variety of purposes external to the student involving larger “educational, economic and political establishments” (garrison, 2012, p. 19). admittedly, this marxist critique of assessment has its limits. it is obviously standard practice for the teacher as practitioner/authority to assert some control over the types of tests and assignments the students produce, as well as to use the results of assessment for a variety of purposes related to instructional planning, communication, and placement (webber et. al., 2009). in the case of diploma exams, however, the standardization of this control is well beyond the authority of the individual practitioner and the totality of the appropriation of the student work does need to be questioned. the process is characterized by a dehumanizing surrender in which the students submit to the examiner, a “documentable” self, (garrison, 2012) a surrender made all the more complete in the case of students with disabilities for whom this self is also documented as bearing deficits through the process of applying for accommodations. once this machinery of sorting and objectification is unconcealed, the pastoral characterization of the level playing field again seems less fitting. level? though the process of diploma exam accommodations does not promise to make the entirety of the school experience equitable for students with disabilities, merely the summative exams, the extent to which the larger playing field of public education may well continue to be tilted against students with disabilities bears comment. the exams do, after all, purport to test the success of these students in learning the larger program of studies. despite a vast and comprehensive system of targeted support for students with disabilities (alberta education, 2004), systemically the rates of high school completion remain much lower for students with diagnosed disabilities than for students with no diagnoses. specifically, according alberta education’s (2009) high school completion longitudinal study of the cohort of students who entered grade 10 in 2002, 79.5% of the non-disabled students completed after three years but only 56.5% of students with mild to moderate disabilities and only 32.3% of students with severe disabilities were able to complete in the same amount of time. though some of the same criticisms about flawed approaches to disability that i raise in this paper may apply to this apparent larger systemic failure to reach many of these learners in k-12 schooling, i only mention this concern in the context of the conversation about levelling the playing field of diploma examinations. is it naivety or hubris to claim that the final test of a k12 education that might have itself been inequitable for a student with a disability can realwilliamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 8 ly be made equitable by providing a few exam accommodations? in the sense of the cliché that the tail of diploma examinations wags the dog of classroom instruction, the familiar concern that teacher anxiety over preparing students for diploma exams often results in “teaching to the test,” or the use of superficial drill and skill teaching practices (alberta teacher’s association, 2009; friesen, 2010; kohn, 2000) is particularly worrisome when it comes to students with disabilities. it has been argued that students with learning disabilities are especially in need of rich, varied, multisensory experiences with curriculum and assessment (dunn, 2010; jacobs & dangling fu, 2012) and they may suffer disproportionality in classrooms where repetitive, narrow forms of teaching and assessment that mirror the diploma exams themselves are used in misguided efforts to prepare students for their diploma examinations. returning to the issue of the diploma exams themselves, exams such as the english language arts exam diploma examinations for writing arguably only test about a third of the actual high school program of studies. while outcomes related to effective composition apply to both the larger program of studies and the exams, other writing outcomes such as “use process oriented writing strategies” seem to have been replaced with noncurricular outcomes such as “generate ideas for writing quickly,” “produce a polished first draft,” and “write well under pressure” (slomp, 2007, p. 184). students with impairments related to spelling, writing, and anxiety while well-served by the generous, developmental, process-oriented approach to writing the program of studies for english endorses are hindered by the narrowed productoriented understanding of writing diploma examinations impose. the playing field, again, may be tilted against students with disabilities in the excessive emphasis of these high-stakes assessments on curricular and even noncurricular outcomes with which they are likely to experience the most difficulty. the power dynamics of accommodations policy too needs to be questioned in the context of the plausibility of claims to levelness. accommodations policies requiring extensive rules of application can, from a disability studies perspective, be understood as a bold exercise of institutional power and control on the self-identity of the individual with a disability (hibbs & pothier, 2005). the default position of the institution is to offer no accommodation and the general equity of the testing process for all is never up for debate. the student requiring the accommodation and the teachers facilitating the process are left with no choice but to endorse through their participation in the application process the institutional deficit-based understanding of disability and accept the rightfulness of the institutional approach to accommodation. self-advocacy, understanding, and requesting the supports that one requires to learn successfully is a common theme in working with individuals with disabilities (alberta education, 2003). the only form of self-advocacy the accommodations process makes available is the docile (foucault, 1977), self-application of a disability deficit label in order to be granted exceptional status. arbiters of levelness david jardine (2008) shared the following ecological vision of a process of differentiation and accommodation that works in fundamentally different ways than that of the diploma exam accommodation process. when i work in the garden with my seven-year-old son, i don’t send him off to a “developmentally appropriate garden.” i take him to the same garden where i am williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 9 going to work. now when we get there and get to the work that place needs, each of us will work, as each of us is able. we are not identical in experience, strength, patience and so on. but both of us will be working in the same place doing the real work that the garden requires. (pp. 111112) it bears consideration how much attention, tact, and prudence on the part of the parent might be required to render working in a garden with a young child a pleasant experience for both parent and child. as new life is occasioned by the work of the parent and child together in the garden, learning too is occasioned by this practical activity. as part of this practical activity, the parent learns through conversing with and observing his child. he learns how much intervention is needed to ensure the child is able to make a real contribution to the enterprise, as an energetic seven year old would be able to with proper instruction, but he also learns how to foster the child’s learning and enjoyment of gardening. he learns how much the child seems independently capable of and how much help he requires. though the situation calls for reflection, it is a reflection grounded in solidarity and practical activity, in which the parent may intuitively grasp instead of reasoning out that the way to familiarize his son with the motion of raking the garden is by guiding his first strokes hand over hand until the child begins to master the motion. in this pedagogy, there is something of heidegger’s (1962) “ready to hand” imbedded understandings, like those of the master carpenters engaged their trade. the practicing teacher, like the parent in the example, instructs and assigns work and observes and talks to his or her students in order to decide how much assistance and support each student will require. i look, with gratitude, on the contributions the medical and psychological fields have made to teachers’ understandings of which supports might prove most helpful for students with various impairments but i feel these types of accommodations should always be grounded in the world of the teacher practitioner working with students. while it is helpful to understand why, from a medical/psychological perspective, a student may require more time than most, a wise teacher should not need a note from a psychologist to know better than to rip an assignment out of the hands of a student who is still actively engaged in completing it, possibly even learning something from the task. the wise teacher, when assisting a student who is having trouble comprehending a passage from a text, does not need clinical verification to know that one way to help might be to read the passage out loud to the student, lest some previously unnoticed aspect of the text announce itself to the student when additional senses are recruited in his or her effort to understand. the medicalized, individual deficit model, in its reliance on experts to declare which accommodations are legitimate for diploma exams, disrupts the “ready to hand” application of supportive pedagogy and alienates the teacher from the practical work of determining which supports his or her students require in the classroom in which they work together. though it might be argued that there is some collaborative involvement of the classroom teacher in this process in that he or she is one of the signatories who must verify use of the accommodation in the classroom in order for the student to qualify, it bears asking what exactly the classroom teacher is being asked to collaborate in? does the signature of the classroom teacher help verify that it is abnormal for a teacher to offer, or a student to require, these forms of accommodation? does it verify that the students who are well-served by these accommodations bear defects, and that the legal/clinical intervention of this docwilliamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 10 ument on classroom practice is welcome and necessary? the teacher who wants to see his or her students receive accommodation is coerced into being a witness, though not an expert witness, in the process, but is otherwise devalued by the requirement of additional medical/psychological verification on the part of a more “expert” witness. the expert witness to the need for accommodation is the psychological or medical practitioner who, though he or she may have little or no actual experience working with the child as a learner, provides the documentation that confirms the disability status that makes available the accommodation. writing of modernity’s increased reliance on such experts when it comes to social determinations of import gadamer (1992) wrote: our society is not deformed just because experts are consulted and recognized for the superiority of their knowledge. quite the opposite. it is almost a duty for human beings to incorporate as much knowledge as is possible in any of their decisions. max weber’s famous expression "purposive rationality" [zweckrationalität] applies here. for weber demonstrated that there was a great danger implicit in those decisions which are determined by emotion or interest: in them the will to be rational is absent which would tie the attainability of the end to the rational determination of means. max weber saw a weakness in modern individualism because it permitted the subordination of the duty to know to the indeterminate authority of a good will, of a good intention, or of a pure conscience. (pp. 188-189) who/what is this pure conscience? any suggestion that the determinations of the types and levels of accommodation students require are messy, complicated and grounded not solely in clinical definitions but in lived experience in classrooms would be antithetical to quest for control and certainty that characterizes both the diploma exam experience proper (graham & neu, 2004) and its accommodation process (hibbs & pothier, 2005). as such, the gatekeeper of accommodation cannot be the student or the teacher, who are subjects being measured; it must come from the outside medical psychological expert and, ultimately, from the decision markers at special cases and accommodations who evaluate the applications. justice in the form of equitable treatment for the student does not emerge from within the messy solidarity in the work of learning in the classroom, it is administered prescriptively, from without by an outside, non-contaminated, medical/psychological authority. the referee or arbiter of the level playing field in this case is, in the cartesian tradition, a curiously disembodied presence with no direct observational connection to the “game” being played and with often a fairly limited relationship to the participant requesting accommodation. play? the presence of students using extra time can pose logistical difficulties in exam administration. as the students who qualified for extra time accommodation continued to write the morning examination well past 12:00 p.m., the exam administrator let students into the gymnasium for the afternoon exam and, once everyone was seated, proceeded to deliver instructions for the new exam over the microphone, all while the students receiving accommodations from the previous exam continue to write. on a different day, as the students who qualified for extra time continued to write the afternoon exam in their desks in the gymnasium, members of the basketball team began to, noisily, move the desks off to the side to make room for their evening practice. williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 11 in a shallowest sense that one type of “play” might be regulated activity like the basketball practise that began to happen during the exam, the characterization of the diploma examination as a form of “play,” in the “level playing field” seems to apply. gadamerian (2004) hermeneutics, however, reads play as much more richly than this, as an experience of movement, freedom, sharing, and infinite, pleasurable regress. play is the to and fro motion of a ball thrown in a game, or absent humans altogether, the play of light or the play of waves. in the shared project of meaning-making, play is how meaning is coestablished, challenged, enriched, and reestablished in conversation and, more broadly, in any interpretive activity. as a part of a festival, travelling players may put on a play in small town and in a strange alchemy the original truth of the play is preserved even as each individual spectator interprets it according to his or her own horizons. the play of festive occasions or holidays, regular events of irregularity, suspends the ordinary relations to time, allowing time to tarry as members take stock or their lives and perhaps even take occasion to think of their lives differently. though it seems to stretch plausibility to suggest that the diploma exam experience, or the diploma exam accommodation process have the potential to fully take on these richer forms of play, these understandings of play certainly point to how depressingly lacking “play” is in the playing field of diploma examinations. time to play if one is truly engaged in an academic subject, taking advantage of the opportunity to “tarry” (jardine, 2008) over an important, summative academic task for that subject might be seen as an honouring of that subject, not a defect in the individual. learner assessment’s framing of this desire, however, echoes the concerns of the early 20th century managerial scientist frederick winslow taylor (1911) that initiative and judgment about how to best perform a task, including how long it should take, are not the domain of the individual worker but the factory manager. in a managerial fetishization of baselines of normality, students are not even expected to do their best but to produce a baseline representation of their capabilities in a time-limited examination (melnyck, 2012). excellence is obtained through the managerial prodding of students and teachers towards ministry-set standards. no consideration is given to what conditions might actually inspire and enable students, as conscientious individuals, to craft their best work. this framing conceals wanting or needing extra time as conscientiousness and reveals it as abnormality. in the rights of passage that saw apprentices go into seclusion to prepare the master crafts which would testify to their readiness for full membership in the guild (a tradition that is still carried on in academic rites of passage at the graduate level of post-secondary education), the mysteries of the discipline are honoured in the expectation that within generous, if any, time limits the candidates will produce their best work (rutherford, 1987). in the diploma exam milieu, the framing of “extra time” through the deficit model and the sense of the students work as a baseline sample, strips both the students and the occasion itself of the dignity that might otherwise arise out of their diligent effort during this summative gathering in the name of the academic discipline. framing it as abnormal to need or want more time invites interpretations of students as others, for which normal expectations of care, tact, and civility need not apply. the accommodation of twice the writing time may render the examination an excessively gruelling experience. in such a case, the students’ optimal levels of concentration and focus abilities are exhausted long before the provided time is. the validity of tests to measure academic achievement is considered to be rewilliamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 12 duced if the examinations are too long (topper, 2001). if, as a thought experiment, examinations for non-accommodated students were deemed to be insufficiently comprehensive and subsequently lengthened and scheduled for a writing time of five or six consecutive hours instead of the current two to three hours one could imagine students, parents, teachers and other stakeholders in education complaining vociferously that this increase in testing time was not only a threat to the examination validity and reliability, but a cruel and unusual imposition on students. basically then, a length of test-taking time that would, hypothetically, be deemed draconian for a nonaccommodated students is offered as a fairness provision for an accommodated student, despite the fact that there is no indication that processing information more slowly increases one’s stamina for intellectual activities or reduces one’s vulnerability to fatigue. are these slower working students deemed to be superhuman in their ability to withstand lengthy examinations? does learner assessment’s parsimonious approach to the time accommodation “problem” trickle down to schools? it provokes suspicion as to whether the students truly need or deserve this time provision or if they are in fact playing the system and loitering. on an institutional level, are alberta’s accommodated students, past the end of the scheduled writing time for other students, given the same right to a silent and distraction-free writing centre, or as the examination winds down, do they begin to be treated, in some schools, as academic loiterers? in addition to the aforementioned examples in my anecdote, i have observed announcements being made to extra time students, near the end of their allotted additional time that they had “30 minutes left” and if they were not finished by then it was “too bad”, and i have wondered if this same stern warning would have been given near the end of the “normal” amount of writing time to the larger body of “normal” students still gathered. in order to, understandably, keep writing centres orderly and distraction-free, exam administrators often regulate no food or drink policies. is it fair that students writing for five hours instead of three held to these policies? does this encourage a system where exam supervisors eager to finally be released from the shifts they hoped would only last three hours repeatedly ask accommodated students if they are “done yet”? levelling for otherness • accommodations are neither intended nor permitted to provide unfair advantage to students with disabilities or medical conditions. (alberta education, 20112). • whatever you do, whichever battle you fight, whichever course of action you attempt, with what are you going to inform it all? the love of difference or the passion for similarity? the former – especially if it becomes socially contagious (through education, cultural action, political action) – leads to human life. the latter leads, in full-blown or latent form, to exploitation, repression, sacrifice, rejection. yes or no, can we live together in fundamental mutual recognition, or must we exclude one another? (stiker, 1999, p. 11) a colleague was assisting me in helping a group of students with diagnosed disabilities, in this case mostly made up of students with learning disabilities and behavioural/emotional disabilities, in the application process for accommodations on diploma examinations. he told the students, “it is really important that you advocate for yourselves by asking for accommodations because you look williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 13 so normal. when people see you they can’t tell anything is wrong with you. stiker presented the choice between love of difference and the passion for similarity as binaries and, in the interest of social justice, they are well considered this way. it seems, however, these differences sometimes blend into each other as well. “accommodation,” for example, in the less clinical sense means that which fulfills our most familiar needs such as those for food or lodging but it can also be defined as something that is granted, given up, or even sacrificed in negotiations between parties (oxford dictionaries, 2012). in strangers, gods and monsters, kearney’s (2003) insightful hermeneutic reading of these three eponymous interpretive alternatives to otherness in which the author, with some help from derrida, emphasized the slipperiness of hospitable acts such as accommodation when he wrote: derrida has much to say about such alien matters in on hospitality. generally understood the subject of hospitality is a generous host who decides as a master chez lui, who to invite into his home. but it is precisely because of such sovereign self-possession that the host comes to fear certain others who threaten to invade his house, transforming him from a host into a hostage. the laws of hospitality thus reserve the right of each host to evaluate, select and choose those he/she wishes to include or exclude, that is the right to discriminate. such discrimination requires that each visitor identifies him or herself before entering one’s home. and this identification process indispensable to the ‘law of hospitality’ (hospitalite en droit) – involves at least some degree of violence. (p. 69) the relative strangeness of these others, in this case, accommodated-for students, is reinforced by the ongoing norm-based discourses which themselves cast the “accommodated other” as the departure from the norm. these concerns have historically and continue to infuse public education, in particular thinking about students with disabilities (graham & slee, 2005). kearney (2003) identified strangers as a limit-experience to us “relatively normals” in that they challenge us to identify ourselves over and against others and, he noted, monsters pose an even stronger limitexperience in reminding us that the self is never quite safe, sovereign, or secure. this is a constant “there by the grace of god go i” moment. all of these anxieties resonate within the policy document from special cases and accommodation division (alberta education, 2011). even as this document grants under what conditions a student might qualify for testing accommodations, it also delineates when the accommodations will be refused. even as this document advances its reified notion of fairness for the accommodated student, it spells out its limits, sternly warning that no advantage will be given – the rules are sacrosanct. the rules and procedures, and the abuses that would constitute a breach of these rules, are minutely described for every believed necessary accommodation. the other, a contrived but seemingly necessary stranger or monster, self-identifies and he/she is invited into the “house” that is the institutional event of the diploma examinations. does the anxious host take hostages when these guests are judged to be a threat to the facade of fairness and openness that “all” guests – it is claimed by the house – have access to? like kearney/derrida’s “anxious host,” the testers know their obligations to these identifiable others but remain anxious. their hospitality is immediately tinged with a jealous protectiveness of the center, or the norm, or the proper and good. still, what is there to protect? perhaps it is test security, precision of measurewilliamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 14 ment, application rigour, observable governability and, above all, the reified concept of an equitable and equal level playing field of competition. disability rights have been hard won through a combination of the activism of people with disabilities and their supporters and legal challenges (hibbs & pothier, 2005; shannon, 2011, zelma, 2009). still, despite public claims from institutions that their responses to this activism are well-intended, they have often been characterized by “stubborn reluctance” (shannon, 2011, para. 1) or through institutional nods to public pressure more so than to clear commitments to inclusive policy (hibbs & potheir, 2005). this creates, at times, a tense relationship in which the rights-based discourse of people with disabilities and their supporters is met with a stern regulatory discourse on the part of the educational institution. policy makers in the educational institution spell out a regulatory process of application for accommodation that is more reflective of fear of legal action than of deeply held commitments to inclusion. under a deficit-based system where accommodations are only granted to those who are deemed categorically eligible, detailed written policy about how to seek accommodations becomes obviously necessary. the tone of such instruction, however, is often less than welcoming and a discursive shift often takes place in which the policy moves from describing how to apply for accommodations to a legalistic listing of the limits to accommodation and the failures on the part of the applicant that will result in ineligibility (hibbs & pothier, 2005). in the albertan diploma exam milieu, the special case division’s written requirements sometimes take on this officious tone. the intent is not to give “advantage” or “optimize performance,” (alberta education, 2011, p. 12) the documents caution, casting students with disabilities as potential cheats at the outset of the process. moreover, if the stringent documentation requirements, deadlines, and necessary signatures are not fully provided on the accommodations applications, “special cases and accommodations will not approve [the] applications” (alberta education, 2011, p. 16.). writing similar concerns about the rigidity of policy, demeaning reliance on deficit understanding of disability, and insistence on individual exceptional accommodation instead of broad institutional action towards inclusiveness students with disabilities at the postsecondary level face, hibbs and pothier (2005) provocatively title a book chapter “mining a level playing field or playing in a minefield?” alternatives i am convinced that even in a highly bureaucratized, thoroughly organized and thoroughly specialized society, it is possible to strengthen existing solidarities. our public life appears to me to be defective in so far as there is too much emphasis upon the different and disputed, upon that which is contested or in doubt. what we truly have in common and what unites us thus remains, so to speak, without a voice. probably we are harvesting the fruits of a long training in the perception of differences and in the sensibility demanded by it. our historical education aims in this direction, our political habits permit confrontations and the bellicose attitude to become commonplace. in my view we could only gain by contemplating the deep solidarities underlying all norms of human life. (gadamer, 1992, p. 192) i do not wish to simply raise a series of concerns about alberta’s diploma exam accommodations without suggesting interpretive and practical alternatives that might move the processes forward towards a more inclusionbased vision of diversity. it is through ongoing dialogue and keeping things in the realm williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 15 of possibility that we are best able to treat students as students, not as reified groups and, in doing so, strive toward more just policies and practices. it is fair to say that it is possible that educators have only begun to understand some of the institutional barriers many students face, our very definitions about who does or does not have educational disabilities are problematic, and that the current process of accommodations does not live up to the claim that is addresses issues of fairness for all students with disabilities. this is a significant minority of students often considered to be especially vulnerable to some of the negative consequences of high-stakes testing (ata, 2009; gorlewski et al., 2012, katsyannis et al., 2007, lin, 2009). if, therefore, there are problems ensuring fairness through accommodation, perhaps the fairest measure to accommodate for disabilities would be to discontinue diploma examinations for all students. when it comes to students with disabilities, and possibly all students, high-stakes tests may measure too narrowly, weigh too heavily, provoke unnecessary anxiety, evoke test disability instead of ability, accommodate too stingily and essentially work to hinder the right of the student to a rich, fair, and sound educational experience (disability rights advocates, 2001; katsyannis et al., 2007). in light of current alberta premier allision redford’s and her former minister of education’s recent statements questioning the high weighting of these exams and the controversies surrounding the effect of diploma examinations on the national competitiveness of alberta’s students in terms of securing post secondary scholarships and admission based on marks requirements (calgary association of parents and school councils, 2011), the suggestion that they be discontinued, while unlikely even under this regime seems a little less unthinkable. even the proposed changes of the weighting of exams, from 50% to 25% of the students’ final grades, while not eliminating any of the issues i have mentioned, might at least help on the level of harm reduction by lowering the stakes. in this vein, an extensive literature review of high-stakes testing and students with disabilities in american schools (katsyannis et al., 2007) recommends that states that insist on using high-stakes testing best level the playing field for students with disabilities and all students by “mak[ing] high school graduation decisions based on multiple indicators of students’ learning and skills” (p. 166). certainly in the alberta system, lowering the weight of this one controversial indicator would make greater space for other measures of student achievement. it seems unwise, however, to discuss pedagogic concerns such as these with “an all or none” approach when prudent educational researchers in alberta and other districts where high-stakes testing is used often accept it as not so much desirable, but as present for the time being, and choose to discuss good pedagogy under these conditions (friesen, 2010; gorlewski et al., 2012). though the alberta teacher’s association has never withdrawn its original objections to the use of high-stakes tests for grading students, it also remains engaged with alberta education as a participant in the discussion of how to make the tests as fair as possible for as long as they exist (ata, 2009). many students are presently impacted by these tests and related accommodation policies and we wish, therefore, to address the possibilities for a more just system of accommodation within the present reality of diploma testing. though this suggestion may at first seem at odds with the historical and inspiring struggle for equal rights for individuals with disabilities to achieve a “level playing field,” perhaps the notions of precisely quantifiable “equity” and “advantage” in terms of many of the accommodations more commonly offered needs to be revisited in light of the possibly more appropriate concepts named by disability studies scholars, williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 16 hibbs and pothier (2005), as accommodation within the standard and flexibility for all. this paradigm aims to make general instruction and assessment as accessible as possible instead of relying on a model of “individual exception to the general standard” (p. 199) and is, in fact, the model of accommodation the supreme court of canada recommends as the starting point for human rights legislation. speaking of university assessment, hibbs and pothier offered the example of how, instead of accommodating for the many types of disabilities that render time-limited tests inaccessible through individual exception, using take-home tests whenever possible provides the same accommodation more democratically, and without reliance on deficit labeling. while it is difficult to imagine take-home diploma accommodations, this vision does inspire speculation of practical application of these principles to diploma testing. with the rapid growth of accessibility technologies, any pc or mac user can now access features on standard software to read text out loud and can dictate orally to a computer that will translate his or her speech to text. with the passing of distracted driving legislation in alberta, which bans manual operation of smart phones and cellular phones while driving, many multi-tasking drivers are using handsfree, voice activated technologies, which are legally sanctioned as less impairing than hand held devices under the new legislation. understanding technological supports such as speech to text and text to speech through the lens of disability accommodation is becoming increasingly antiquated. alberta education’s special cases and accommodations division has worked very hard to ensure that no accommodations pose a validity thread to the “constructs” of the diploma examinations, so framing reading and writing options for all to include broadly optional audio cds and use of speech to text software would be no real threat. “broadening [these] definitions of reading [and] writing” for all students (dunn, 2010, p.18; see also edyburn, 2009) would not only eliminate an unnecessarily negative framing of impairments that impact reading and writing, it might grant many more students not an advantage, but a more flexible means to show their competencies. though this might be seen as undermining the importance of more primary, physical reading and writing skills, these things are still relatively ubiquitous in k-12 education and broadening the technological options students have to interpret the complex texts and produce the complex responses the examinations require seems unlikely to contribute to producing a generation of non readers/writers. opening up these options might be seen as a stance towards emerging technologies equivalent to alberta education’s eventual support of widespread use of word processing as an option for completing the written portions of diploma examinations. while at one time almost all students in alberta wrote diploma exams using pen and paper (hart, 1987) and many states and provinces still allow word processing only as a special education accommodation (katsyannis et al., 2006; lin, 2010), alberta education now makes this accommodation broadly available and their records indicate 80% of alberta’s students selected this technology for producing written responses on diploma exams last year (alberta education, 2012). we do not suggest that 80% of students may eventually choose to listen to the readings and dictate their responses on diploma exams, only that these options now broadly available on standard computing software should, like the option of word processing, be made available to any students who would choose to use them. as well, the issue of time needs to be revisited. when avoiding an individual deficit interpretation that sees the need for “extra” time as abnormal, the presence of a significant minority of students who seem to require more than the allotted three hours can re-emerge, unconcealed, as a problem with the length of the williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 17 assessments in general. this unconcealing may lead to learner assessment reconsidering the length of the exams for all learners. reframing these reading, writing, and time accommodations to allow for more flexible assessment conditions for all students would, for many students with disabilities, strip the layer of “governance of disability” (tremain, 2005) from the diploma testing experience. there would no longer be the need to self-identify given the broad availability of what were formerly accommodations. the application process for remaining accommodations, braille, and large print exams for example, obvious in their specificity to discreet impairments might be streamlined to meet the logistical needs of ordering more so than the complex burden of proof of disability and prior usage of the accommodations. i remain doubtful about whether diploma exams proper are an educational practice that is consistent with the values of inclusive education, or to put it another way: i question if underlying technologies of control, surveillance, and competition are things to which any student, least of all more vulnerable students, should be subject. still, if diploma exams are to remain, for now, as highly weighted academic tasks students are required to complete in order to graduate, ongoing critique is needed to ensure their consistency with the educational values of inclusive education the larger institution of alberta education purports to hold. significant re-design of the accommodations process and examination design and administration may help push diploma examination policy out of the individual deficit model and at least provide all students with greater access to, in the words of foucault (1988) various “technologies of the self” to select their preferred options for responding to the assessments, thereby mitigating, at least to some degree that impact of the larger “technologies of power” that characterizes the whole enterprise. acknowledgement i (john williamson) would like to gratefully acknowledge the mentorship of dr. jim field who has engaged me in conversations about justice for students when he taught me as an undergraduate, and then again during my m.a., and as he now continues to teach me as my phd supervisor. this article would not be possible without the seeds of thought and concern these conversations planted in me. references aaron, p. (1997). the impending demise of the discrepancy formula. review of educational research, 67, 461 502. doi: 10.3102/00346543067004461 alberta education. (2012). accountability pillar results for annual education results report (aerr). edmonton, ab, canada: author. alberta education. (2012). high school completion in alberta. edmonton, ab, canada: author. http://education. alberta.ca/admin/ highschoolcompletion/albertacompletion rate.aspx alberta education. (2012). department information and newsroom. retrieved from inclusive education: http://education.alberta. ca/department/ipr/inclusion.aspx alberta education. (2011). diploma examinations: frequently asked questions. edmonton, ab, canada: author. alberta education. (2011). general information bulletin diploma examination program. edmonton, ab, canada: author. alberta education. (2011). special education. retrieved from special education statistics: williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 18 http://www.education.alberta.ca/admin/specia l/stats/bycode.aspx alberta education. (2010). special education coding criteria. edmonton, ab, canada: author. alberta education. (2009). setting the direction: framework. edmonton, ab. canada: government of alberta. alberta education (2009). accountability and reporting division high school completion longitudinal study. edmonton, ab, canada: crown in right of alberta. alberta education. (2006). identifying student needs: selecting accommodations and strategies. edmonton, ab. canada: author. alberta education. (2004). standards for special education. edmonton, ab, canada: crown in right of alberta. alberta education. (2003). unlocking potential: key components of programming for students with learning disabilities. edmonton, ab, canada: crown in right of alberta. alberta teacher's association. (2009). real learning first: the teaching profession’s view of student assessment. edmonton, ab, canada: author. allan, j. (2008). rethinking of inclusive education: the philosophers of difference in practice. dorecht, the netherlands: springer. bienstock, r. (producer), & harper, s. (director). (2011). the age of anxiety [motion picture]. canada: canadian broadcasting corporation. calgary association of parents and school councils (2011). capsc question for parents and school councils. calgary, ab, canada: author. retrieved from http://www.capsc. ca/site/story.asp?id=531&tactic=38 clifford. p., friesen, s. & jardine. d.w. (2008). “whatever happens to him happens to us: reading coyote and reading the world. in d.w. jardine, p. clifford, & s. friesen (eds.), back to the basics of teaching and learning “thinking the world together”(pp. 67-78). new york, ny: routledge. collins, s. (2008). the hunger games. new york, ny: scholastic. danforth, s., & gabel, s. (2006). vital questions facing disability studies in education. new york, ny: peter lang. disability rights advocates. (2001). do no harm high-stakes testing and students with learning disabilities. retrieved from www.dralegal.org/downloads/pubs/do_no_har m.pdf dunn, p. (2010, november). reseeing (dis)ability. english journal, 100, 14-36. dudley-marling, c., & gurn, a. (2010). the myth of the normal curve. new york, ny: peter lang. edyburn, d. (2009). principles of universal design and the implications for policy initiatives. retrieved from www.education. alberta.ca/media/938200/edyburnudlreport.pdfstati stics, courses information sheet. retrieved from http://math. ucalgary.ca/files/math/ courses/f09/amat217/lec6/amat217-f09lec6-outline.pdf foucault, m. (1988). the means of correct training. in p. rabinow (ed.), the foucault reader (pp. 188-205). new york, ny: pantheon. williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 19 foucault, m. (1977). discipline and punish. (a. sheridan, trans.). new york, ny: vintage. foucault, m. (1988). in l. martin, h. gutman, & p. hutton (eds.), technologies of the self. boston, ma: university of massachusetts. friesen, s. (2010). uncomfortable bedfellows: discipline based inquiry and standardized examinations. teacher librarian, 37(6), 8-14. gadamer, h.g. (1992). the limitations of the expert. in d. misgeld & g. nicholson (eds.), hans-georg gadamer on education, poetry, and history (l. schmidt & m. reuss, trans.) (pp. 165-181). new york, ny: state university of new york. gadamer, h.g. (2004). truth and method (j. weinsheimer, & d.g. marshall, trans.) london, england: continuum. gallagher, d. (2010). educational research and the making of normal people. in c. dudley-marling & a. gurn (eds.), the myth of the normal curve (pp. 25-39). new york, ny: peter lang. garrison, j. (2012). academic labour as alienated labour: resisting standardized testing. in j. gorlewski, b. porfilio, & d. gorlewski (eds.). using high-stakes testing for students: exploiting power with critical pedagogy. new york, ny: peter lang. gorlewski, j., porfilio, b., & gorlewski, d. (2012). introduction. in j. gorlewski, b. porfilio, & d. gorlewski (eds.). using highstakes testing for students: exploiting power with critical pedagogy. new york, ny: peter lang. graham, c., & neu, d. (2004). standardized testing and the construction of governable persons. journal of curriculum studies,36(3), 295-319. doi:10.1080/0022027032000167080 hacking, i. (1995). rewriting the soul: multiple personality and the sciences of memory. new jersey, ny: princeton. hart, l.c. (1987). teaching high school english with alberta's diploma exams: an assessment through oral research and dramatic presentation. m. ed. project, university of lethbridge, lethbridge, ab, canada. retrieved from https://www.uleth.ca /dspace/handle/10133/110 heidegger, m. (1962). being and time (j. macquarrie & e. robinson, trans.). new york, ny: harper collins. hibbs, t., & pothier, d. (2005). postsecondary education and disabled students: mining a level playing field or playing in a minefield? in d. pothier & r. devlin (eds.), critical disability theory: essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law (pp. 195-222). vancouver, bc, canada: ubc press. jardine, d.w. (2012). the descartes lecture. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 7. pid: http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5pr7n88. jardine, d.w. (2008). because it shows us the way at night: on animism, writing, and the reanimation of piagetian theory. in d.w. jardine, p. clifford, & friesen (eds.), back to the basics of teaching and learning: thinking the world together (pp. 105-116). new york, ny: routledge. jardine, d.w. (2008). on the while of things. journal of the american association for the advancement of curriculum studies, 4. retrieved from ww2.uwstout.edu/content/ jaaacs/vol4/jardine.pdf williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 20 katsyannis, a., zhang, d., ryan, j., & jones, j. (2007). high-stakes testing and students with disabilities: challenges and promises. journal of disability policy studies, 18, 160167. doi:10.1177/10442073070180030401 kohn, a. (2000). standardized testing and its victims. education week. sep. 27, 2000. retrieved from: education weekfile:///macintosh%20hd/desktop%20folder/ ew_printstory.cfm klassen, r. (2002). the changing landscape of learning disabilities in canada 1989 2000. school psychology international, 23, 199-219. lin, p-y. (2010). test accommodations in canadian provincial assessments. retrieved from canadian test centre: www.canadiantestcentre.com oxford dictionaries on-line (2012). retrieved from http://oxforddictionaries.com/ redi, d., & valle, j. (2001). the discursive practice of learning disability: implications for instruction and parent-school relations. journal of learning disabilities, 37, 466-481. doi:10.1177/00222194040370060101 rutherford, e. (1987). sarum: a novel of england. new york, ny: random house shakespeare, t. a. (2002). the social model of disability: an outdated ideology? research in social science and disability, 2, 9-28. shannon, j. (2011). the promised land will be wheelchair accessible. chicago sun times. retrieved from http://blogs.suntimes .com/ demand/2011/10/the_promised_ land_will_be_wheelchair-accessible.html simons, m., & masschelein, j. (2005). inclusive education for exclusive pupils. in s. tremain (ed.), foucault and the government of disability (pp. 208-297). ann arbour, mi: university of michigan press. slee, r., & allan, j. (2001) excluding the included: a recognition of inclusive education. international studies in sociology of education, 11(2), 173‐191. slomp, d. (2007). trapped between paradigms: composition pedagogy in the context of a twelfth grade standardized writing assessment. [electronic version]. proquest – dissertations & theses. edmonton, ab, canada: university of alberta. stiker, h-j. (2002). a history of disability (w. sayer, trans.) ann arbor, mi: university of michigan. task force on dsm iv. (2000). diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed. rev.). washington, dc: american psychiatric association. taylor, f.w. (1911). the principles of scientific management. retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/eco nomics/taylor/principles/index.htm. topper, d. (2001). examining the motives behind standardized tests. social education, sept.2001. tremain. s. (ed.) (2005). foucault and the government of disability. ann arbour, mi: university of michigan press. webber, n., aitken, n., lupart, j., & scott, s. (2009). the alberta student assessment study: final report. edmonton, ab, canada: crown in right of alberta. zelma, g. (2009). leveling the playing field special education and the law. nyu child study centre. retrieved from williamson & paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 13 21 http://www.aboutour kids.org/articles/ understanding_special_education_law note 1 this article contains frequent uses of experiential data written in the first person by the first author, john williamson, a high school teacher and site-based coordinator of special education services. for the sake of structural flow, we have chosen to use the first person voice throughout the piece though we also want to emphasize that this work reflects the ideas and concerns of both authors, the second of whom, dr. jim paul, comes to this issue as a teacher educator. corresponding author: kate beamer university of calgary email: kmbeamer@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics november 1, 2017 the author(s) 2017 and coyote howled: listening to the call of interpretive inquiry kate beamer abstract in this article, i explore aspects of grief and the surprising mirroring of hermeneutic research and the experience of grief. neither grief or hermeneutic research are predictable, formulaic, or without surprises, and both require patience, humility, and an openness to what comes to greet us in the nature of aletheia. keywords hermeneutics, interpretive inquiry, grief, aletheia, i stood at the front of the hall, tracing the outline of your urn with my finger. a traditional urn did not seem to suit you, however much a container can depict a life, so i selected one made from bamboo, box shaped and tall, with trees carved into it. my fingers followed the indented grooves of the branches, rooting me to a place i did not want to be. two hundred people milled around behind me, but i only saw you. your face, encased by silver frames, holding our sons, arms around each other, smiling. we were happy. hands approached me from behind, resting on my shoulders. even in my cognitive distance, i could hear a semblance of reassurances: “you’ve got this;” “you’re such a strong woman;” “if anyone can do this, it’s you.” something outside of the funeral hall window caught my attention and my gaze shifted toward a rustling in the bushes. coyote. it was one of those bone chilling winters, a harsh climate, that provided comfort to me in its barren, hollow form. yet still, there was movement. after the memorial, i returned home to a now empty house and a flood of emails all containing the same theme: strength and resilience. i read them on my phone while lying on the floor, completely gutted, shaking, in the fetal position, wrapped in the blanket that you died in. their written depiction of me did not match what i saw beamer journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 10 2 in the reflection of the sliding glass door: a woman, broken, ripped open, heaving, a guttural cry sounding out from deep inside, hands entwined in snot soaked kleenex, trying to move my wedding band from my left ring finger to my right. how did i get here? how did we get here? and what am i going to do now? historically, grief has been conveyed as a temporary, sequential process that one endures for a period of time until it ceases, returning us to our “normal” selves (moules, 1998; moules, 2009; thirsk & moules, 2013). while this notion of staged grieving is becoming replaced by more current theories of grief that view it as an enduring and lifelong transformation of the self (moules, 1998; moules, 2009; thirsk & moules, 2013), the effects of the stage models are still influential in how many people perceive and process grief. grief is portrayed as something that we need to rid ourselves of through an unrealistic cloak of courage and detachment. words such as “resilience” and “strength” seem to denote a stance of success that are needed to conquer grief: “resilience, as an idea, carries an association with strength of will. to be able to resume an original shape in the aftermath of trauma is often considered laudable, and those who are able to ‘bounce back’ and recoil in the face of adversity should be admired” (thomas, 2016, para. 4). how can one possibly rebound from the sudden death of a spouse? as mentioned, grief has long been compiled into a staged sequential model (moules, 1998; moules, 2009; moules, simonson, prins, angus, & bell, 2004) that we are encouraged to “whip through” in order to “return back to normal.” but there is no return and, in my life trajectory, there was never a normal. two days after my husband died suddenly in his sleep, i was accepted into the doctoral program. i laugh a bit now, at the naiveté of my pre-grief written proposal. i was intent, focussed, strong, sure of myself, tenacious. i saw in myself then, the resiliency that i was supposed to possess now. i knew what i was going to do and how i was going to do it. i was going to grab research by the horns and show everyone that i knew exactly what i was doing. there was no doubt, no wavering, no openness to feedback. i had studied the topic of curricular interventions for child sexual abuse survivors in my master’s degree, and i was going to drive it home for my doctoral dissertation. this was my calling, where my strength lay, where i tread familiar ground. the certainty of the tone of my proposal seems foreign to me now—that was the voice of resilience and strength. but now…but now… everything is tethered together by cryptic threads that are rapidly dissolving with each out breath. now i live on shaky ground. my topic, my life, the reality as i once knew it, is crumbling beyond my control. the strength i once knew has been replaced by an uneasy vulnerability, and i rest in limbo, torn between the world i once knew and the one that is now consuming me. this was not the plan. but apparently, hermes had other plans for me, and perhaps this was the lesson. perhaps, i was being called. like life’s traumas, the hermeneutic address is something that can happen to us, without heed or warning. what we may have conceptualized as our topic might not be pursued in the manner that we initially had planned. sometimes, it is what bothers us the most, the thing that keeps us up at night, that nags us, provokes us, pisses us off, that ends up being our topic. it is the responsibility of interpretivists to listen to that call when it arises: as a practice, hermeneutics is not a neutral enterprise; we do not simply select a method and aim it at the work to accomplish something we want to do. rather, it is action called upon for the achievement of some moral good… it is a call that addresses us in the beamer journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 10 3 first person … what can i add to the larger conversation, in the discipline, that might help us see, think about, act differently toward the phenomenon? (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015, p. 58) everything i see now is tinted through a grief stricken lens. the resiliency in which i drafted my initial proposal has since left the building. what calls out to me now is not the same that had provoked me previously. the thoughts that keep me awake at night, the horrific images of your lifeless body covered in carefully placed sheets to hide the autopsy cuts, me throwing myself on top of you, pounding your stiff chest with my fists—the sheets falling to the floor; i have been ripped open to a point where everything looks different; everything has been marked by you. there is no return to a previous self, for this is where i live now. grief has affected my perceptions and understanding of the world, so it is inevitable that it will impact my topic of research; yet, it is not a temporal shift just as my grief is not a transient state. it is a new way of knowing. grief is not a temporal state; it is a transformation of the self: “grief becomes a permanent, enduring, sometimes relenting, sometimes poignant, but always present part of the life of a person who has lost” (moules, 1998, p. 148). part of accepting this transformation is surrendering to the fact that it is happening, and even though it is well beyond our control, that is okay. there is a belief in our society that if we do everything right, no one will suffer. it is supported by the paradigm that believes we can control and manipulate our worlds entirely—but there is nothing anyone can do to escape grief. death is not something that we can overcome. perhaps grief brings suffering that we can never escape because it also means we have lived and loved. perhaps it is in grief that we are still reminded about our nature of the lack of control over some aspects of our worlds, the nature of human suffering, and the ever-present possibilities of hope that allow suffering to be something beyond pain and anguish. (thirsk & moules, 2013, p. 93) there is nothing i can do to escape this. as i kept repeating to the police officers when they knocked on the door to tell me of your passing: “this is actually happening.” no amount of strength is going to change this. so, it is in this sheer state of vulnerability and woundedness that i realize, no, i have not “got this”—and i am starting to think that it is not only okay to feel this way, but also necessary. a certain humility is needed when conducting hermeneutic research in the same vein that ego has no place in grief. just as i must surrender to the process of grief, i must also be vulnerable in the calling of interpretive work. hermeneutics deals with life, in all of its complexities and messiness, in ways that many other methodologies do not recognize. therefore, when life shifts, when life gets complicated, when we are called to attend to a different dilemma than one first imagined, hermeneutics is there to embrace that. for hermeneutics thrives in the difficulties of life, demands that risks be taken to examine the ambiguity of life: hermeneutics is not a theory of knowledge but the art of life and death, and ranges over the length and breadth and depth of life. hermeneutics does not shy away from the beamer journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 10 4 difficulty of life but summons the courage to deal with life in all its ambiguity. hermeneutics takes the risk of embracing the coming of what we cannot see coming. (caputo, in moules et al., 2015, p. xiii) the art of life and death. when the trickster appears. when our world is turned instantly upside down, when the unforeseeable happens. these are the moments of address in which hermeneutics delves into and thrives. hermeneutics is not about deductively charging into the world, trying to prove its own theory. it is much softer than that. it is not about resilience or objective truth, it is about curiosity into life’s most complex and intricate experiences. when we set out to discover the truth about something, to learn its innermost essence, a sense of humility is required: “hermeneutical questioning is informed by a humility toward one’s own not knowing, a genuine curiosity toward what the other might have to say, and the goal of shared understanding – not simply taking information for one’s own ends” (moules et al., 2015, p. 42). if our intent when conducting research is to really understand something, then we must be prepared to encounter the unknown. in this way, it is no different from grief. this journey i have been placed on is not about being strong; it is about surrendering to this unchartered experience and trusting enough to let it move me to where i need to be. so, while vulnerability and humility are needed to truly listen to the call as it appears in our lives, so is a sense of bravery to follow that call, not knowing exactly where it will take us, but having the faith to know its importance. a compelling aspect of hermeneutics is its correlation between understanding and experience. we are situated in this life with our own personal, cultural, and historical experiences. what we experience in life often calls out to us as interpretivists. but what if that experience changes? what if something occurs to trump our past priorities of experience? what if what was once important fades softly into the back glow of another, more urgent experience? this grief, this deep well of seemingly endless grief has changed me. it directs my interests, has changed my perceptions on fairness, and sorrow, and hardship. in essence, my understanding has changed. how could it not? having the police come to my door, and tell me in front of our two small children that you are dead; watching my sons fall to the floor in confused anguish, falling alongside them in a heap of hysteria. being whisked off to identify your body, trying in a desperate attempt of preservation to crawl into your casket before you entered the cremator. clawing at the wood panels of the box as you proceeded to enter anyway. how could it not? this new form of understanding has direct implications on my topic of research, and by revisiting my topic through this new lens, i also have come to understand myself better. it is because our understanding is so directly tied to our experiences where the most precious form of knowing occurs: “all understanding is ultimately self-understanding” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 251). we are not stagnant in life, and neither is our topic. just as our experience grows and evolves, so does our understanding of our topical interest. our topics also have life, and cannot remain unchanged. new research may debunk our previous theories; different methodologies interpret different results. the researcher’s experience also has direct effect on the topic. while i still am in pursuit of the topic of child sexual abuse survivors’ experiences in schools, i approach it differently now, with more of a focus on the narrative nature of trauma, and with a gentler, more humble and curious outlook, knowing that i am not all knowing, knowing that the trickster is always waiting in the shadows to reinforce that humility if needed. we are always moving, but if we move in patience, it could bring us much closer to the truth than hardened strength and resilience ever could. beamer journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 10 5 instead of attending to research with some type of indignant fervour, what if it was approached instead with humility and patience? what if it was approached with the same resonance that i have learned to embrace grief? “patience, in its original meaning, was a virtue that enabled a person to overcome his suffering and, in some sense, enact understanding in the face of the faults and limitations of others” (thomas, 2016, para. 8). sometimes, in order to truly embrace understanding, we must put aside our preconceived notions and ego in patient perseverance of true understanding. what i have learned about grief as i meander on its journey is that there is no prescription; there are no five stages (moules, 1998; moules et al., 2004). grief does not proceed in a systematic format with shock followed by anger followed by denial. oftentimes it is more cyclical, one step forward two steps back. as soon as i feel that the anger has been conquered, it comes rushing back in grabbing me by the throat, urgent, overwhelming, and consuming. perhaps it is the trickster fooling me again. perhaps hermes is trying to tell me that the lesson has not yet been learned, that i am still on the brink of discovering. patience. patience recognises suffering in the difficulties of one’s life and that of another. …patience becomes a way of bearing sorrows. unlike resilience, which implies retuning to an original shape, patience suggests change and allows the possibility of transformation as a means of overcoming difficulties. it is a simultaneous act of defiance and tenderness, a complex existence that gently breaks barriers. in patience, a person exists on the edge of becoming. with an abundance of time, people are allowed space to be undefined, neither ending nor broken, but instead, transfigured. and it is an act of courage, because only the unknown lies on the other side of the threshold of events we seek to overcome. (thomas, 2016, para. 9) it is the same with interpretive work. patience is needed to understand the phenomenon, to understand our positioning in its interpretation. it also requires a sense of openness that is not characteristic in a stance of guarded strength and resilience. as soon as we have firmly established in our minds that that is the way that something occurs, we close off our likelihood of seeing other possibilities. we become resistant to change and potential truth. i could have easily prescribed myself to the common notion that grief occurs in temporary sequential stages that, once completed, would return me back to a sense of normalcy, back to where i was. but there is no turning back. instead, encapsulated in a state of egoless vulnerability, i opened myself to other forms of truth. there is always another way. yet it did take the death of a spouse to break down those walls of righteous indignation, of a sense of egoic mastery. but that is the way of the trickster. as soon as you think you have truly “got” or understood something, he is there to playfully tell you, “not so fast my child, not so fast.” it is important that both the experience of grief and the topics that drive us not remain hidden, but instead, needs to be uprooted from where it often resides, deep inside, and be unearthed. for what remains hidden, can never be brought to light. this is a hermeneutic concept called aletheia: [aletheia] is also connected to the mystical river lethe in hades; the river of forgetfulness – a river that, if crossed, erased memory. aletheia is the antithesis of this: it is about remembering. in its unconcealment, enlivening, and remembering, aletheia beamer journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 10 6 brings home what may have been lost, forgotten, deadened, or concealed… (moules, 2015, pp. 1-2) aletheia occurs when something that has been historically hidden, is brought to the surface: “aletheia works against what was dead bringing it to life; it remembers and unconceals what was forgotten or lost…” (moules et al., 2015, p. 3). hermeneuts often set out in pursuit of unearthing and revealing some of life’s most complex and intricate, often intimate, experiences. we need to unearth and reveal and remember in order to move forward, as we draw on our pasts to guide us. it is this concept of aletheia and remembering that is becoming more prominent in more modern theories of grief: “grief invites us to look back, to remember. we willingly and necessarily, in grief, walk back into time and history, recalling when the one who died was physically present. at the same time, however, we learn how to continue to live and to move ahead” (moules et al., 2004, p. 103). unearthing what was once hidden or what we wish could remain hidden is not always easy. eight months later, and i still wake up every morning expecting you to be there. in my fog of early morning grogginess, i roll over to reach for you. it is only when my hand grazes the empty pillow that i remember my reality. as much as i wish i could plunge into the river lethe and forget all that has happened, as much as i instinctually want to push these memories of you down so that they reside deep in unconscious remembering, i know that this is not the way. these memories and stories of you need to be unearthed. i do it for our children. i do it in honour of the love i have for you. a part of the reason that we live in this world is to experience the terrible hermeneutic angst of remembering. there are times we wish to swim the river lethe and forget, and there are times we are afraid we already have and we clamour to reclaim what is lost from memory. …in hermeneutic understanding, we know that things must be awakened, recalled, remembered, and suffered. (moules, 2015, p. 4) it is important to remember suffering. it guides me to being a better person; it is through suffering that we have the possibility of transformation, and as gadamer states, “a transformation into the true” (1969/1980, p. 112). many cultures possess stories of the trickster, that sneaky character who can pull the rug out from under you, teach you lessons and illuminate experiences. he goes by many names: coyote, raven, hermes, loki (“trickster,” n.d.). the trickster character has been used in folklore to demonstrate the impermanence of life, reveal secret or sacred knowledge (albeit indirectly), and instigate change. as the messages of the trickster are often indirect, interpretation is required in order to find the meaning behind the messages. indeed, hermeneutics is associated with the trickster hermes, who had “the capacity to see things anew and his power is change, prediction, and the solving of puzzles” (moules et al., 2015, p. 2). one cannot encounter the trickster without a sense of reverent humility. the trickster appears when a guide is needed, when inexplicable change occurs, when we seek meaning for events we do not understand: “the coyote or trickster, as embodied in southwest native american accounts, suggests the situation we are in when we give up mastery but keep searching for fidelity, knowing all the while that we will be hoodwinked” (haraway, 1988, p. 594). in order to best interpret the messages presented to us by the trickster, we must be patient and still enough to listen carefully. we must read the beamer journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 10 7 signs. we cannot hear the messages if we are wrapped up in an indignant shroud of strength. as often, it is in our most vulnerable state where true resilience is found. i sit here writing this one day after the worst mass shooting in modern american history. over fifty families instantaneously now join me in the grief journey. tomorrow there will be more. the wind whips at my windows, unruly, caused by an unexpected fall snowstorm. coyote howls. life is precious, fleeting, sacred. this is not where i thought my research was going to go, in the same vein that i did not know this is where my life was going to go. my life has now been divided into two parts: life with you, and life after you. i try to follow it as it ebbs and flows. a small settling of dust has accumulated on the tops of your framed pictures, and i know now that you have been gone for a while. it is my only indication that time has passed, as i live out each day in horrific presence of your absence in my world. but i also know that these feelings too will pass, and i will be propelled forward into a new state. i must be patient. i now approach my topic of research in a state of humility and vulnerability, seeing it differently, more clearly than before. for even in death, we can be given gifts of understanding. that is the way of the trickster. i cradle my topic carefully in my hands, the same way i held you as you lay on the metal gurney at the funeral home: gently, realizing the fragility and temporality and movement of life, knowing with acute awareness that how i approach this topic, will have implications. we are all called at different times and stages in life. coyote. the trickster. hermes. we must listen to these calls of life with the same urgency that we address what is calling to us in research. this is not about resilience or strength; it is about patient listening and openness. it is about unearthing what lies deep inside of us. perhaps our topic will change. perhaps, our existing topic will be given new life. perhaps it will be us who are changed through engagement with our topic. i now wear a necklace engraved with your fingerprint, the inside containing your ashes. it is all i have left of your bodily form. i run my fingers over it and am reminded of the movement of life. nothing is stagnant. nothing is solidified in permanence. we are in a perpetual state of motion, yet what propels us, what calls out to us may evolve and shift and, as researchers, as humans, we must heed that calling as if our life depends on it. as often, whether we recognize it or not, it does. references gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.; j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. haraway, d. (1988). situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. feminist studies, 14(3), 575-599. doi:10.2307/3178066 moules, n.j. (1998). legitimizing grief: challenging beliefs that constrain. journal of family nursing, 4(2), 142-166. moules, n.j. (2009). grief and families: applying the illness beliefs model to bereavement. in l.m. wright & j.m. bell beliefs: the heart of healing in families and illness (rev. ed.) (pp. 305-317). calgary, ab, canada: 4th floor press. moules, n.j. (2015). editorial. aletheia: remembering and enlivening. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 2. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5qr4p68 http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5qr4p68 beamer journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 10 8 moules, n.j., simonson, k., prins, m., angus, p., & bell, j.m. (2004). making room for grief: walking backwards and living forward. nursing inquiry, 11(2), 99-107. moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. thirsk, l.m., & moules, n.j. (2013). “i can just be me”: advanced practice nursing with families experiencing grief. journal of family nursing, 19, 74-98. doi: 10.1177/1074840712471445 thomas, s. (2016). how patience can be a better balm for trauma that resilience. aeaon. retrieved from https://aeon.co/essays/how-patience-can-be-a-better-balm-for-trauma-thanresilience trickster. (n.d.). in wikipedia. retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/trickster https://aeon.co/essays/how-patience-can-be-a-better-balm-for-trauma-than-resilience https://aeon.co/essays/how-patience-can-be-a-better-balm-for-trauma-than-resilience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/trickster corresponding author: james c field, phd werklund school of education university of calgary email: jfield@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics march 12, 2017 the author(s) 2017 losing the so-called paradigm war: does our confusion, disarray, and retreat contribute to the advance? james c field abstract in this article, i argue that what is commonly lamented as the decline of qualitative research might be because of our own inability to reveal something true about being-in-the-world. four problems with qualitative work are identified: making what is obvious inescapable, confusion around what constitutes qualitative research and phenomenology, uniformed and disrespectful mixing of methods, and devolution into “little t” truth. i finish by calling for bold, evocative interpretation, and posing the question: what is the nature of the revolution that hermeneutics can foment? keywords qualitative research, hermeneutics, phenomenology mixed methods, bricoleur, multiple realties, truth after being a coauthor on an article in the journal of applied hermeneutics recently about the resurgence of positivist science, framed in terms of losing the war, i was left with a niggling feeling that has grown into an awful question that “cannot possibly be true, but just might be true.” it sits uncomfortably between knowing and not knowing, hope and dread. so, in this spirit, let me ask this dreadful question: what if the fact that qualitative research is “losing the war” is not simply because of some hostile take-over from science, or a creeping form of alt-right totalitarianism, (although i am sorely tempted to go with this interpretation), but because of our own failure, in far too many cases, to reveal, and to claim, boldly, courageously, something true, something that matters about being in the world and doing interpretive work? i can hear the howl that will go up in response to this question-assertion, and rightly so perhaps, from good field journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 5 2 folks who do good work. i submit this piece under a “guilty as charged” verdict, and i will have to wait; indeed, i look forward to what the “sentencing” might be. the trial is not over, i am sure. however, since i call for courage in doing interpretive work, i think it is time i heeded my own council. so, let me ask that we consider, briefly, the possibility that the enemy might be within. like the democratic party in the united states, perhaps it is time we stopped laying the blame for qualitative research’s decline entirely on someone or something else, and took a good, hard look at ourselves. i offer here an initial foray into what might be termed “the crimes we ourselves have committed.” making what is patently obvious completely inescapable, and/or finding exactly what we are looking for i remember the sting of the first phrase on one of my first graduate papers, from a supervisor whose style has long since disappeared: “this is all very literate,” he wrote in the margin of the third page, “the trouble is that you have made what is patently obvious completely inescapable.” an unkind remark perhaps, made over 30 years ago, but i think it is still a relevant and appropriate critique of far too much qualitative work. i read too many qualitative studies that end with “insights” like this: teachers need to develop relationships with their students; students need to trust their teachers; classrooms need to be safe spaces; principals need to support their teachers; and, hang on to your hats, staffs need to talk to each other. in short, a lot of wha t we know gets confirmed, but nothing new is revealed. part of the problem here might spring from devoting too much time and space in interpretive work to scientific verification, (or should i say lincoln and guba-fication?) and not enough to interpretive revelation. note what norylk and harder (2010) have to say about their review of 37 articles on phenomenological research: it is remarkable that many of the articles reviewed in our study drew on lincoln and guba’s criteria (1985) to evaluate or justify their research. these criteria are generic to qualitative research, and were not specifically developed to evaluate phenomenological work. (p. 428) yet they are. so, it raises the question of what we are up to when we do things like this, but it also might contribute to the “much ado about nothing “charge leveled earlier. could we be squeezing out controversies, contradictions, differences, and suddenly appearing, startling insights methodologically, through things like “member checking”? i see this procedure liberally employed in qualitative work, without much thought as to what it assumes convergence around a single point and, at the same time, what it might prevent. something happens when we switch our attention from the phenomenon (die sache selbst) to the method used to generate and or confirm the truth of die sache. oddly, the very thing that has to fall way, the procedure, so that what is revealed, the substance of the matter at hand can come into view, is brought back squarely into the field of vision. we switch our attention away from the truth, “the gleaming, glistening, shining forth,” to the how and the who of the truth. in these instances, we have failed to pull out the bottom card of the scientific enterprise: that it is method and tools that yield truth. personally, i have never understood how “member checking” establishes truth or rigor. it seems to me to sail too easily past a set of questions that should trouble us these days: have we checked field journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 5 3 for truth, or simply switched to detailing our relationship with our participants? if everyone agrees, then can we assume that it is the truth, or a truth we have found? what happens if there is disagreement, especially between the participants and the researcher? how do i treat that as a researcher? do i assume that either what i think or what my participants think, feel, or see is false? underneath these questions is the troubling question of authority: can i draw my own conclusions or insights as a researcher, or is what i have to say about a particular phenomenon confined only to what my participants attest to or agree with? i wonder if we have made the mistake of unwittingly ascribing to a simple formula: meaning=agreement= significance=truth? have we blocked a way to deeper understanding because “we are so accustomed in the contemporary world to think that the human being is the source of all ‘saying’” (capobianco, 2014, p. 92)? i think this state of affairs is exacerbated by too many of us doing research with folks who think, feel, see, and act exactly as we do: as members of the choir, we do research on the choir. little wonder, i suppose, that we often end up simply singing along, with the same old self. in this case, the projection of our pre-understandings are simply confirmed by the interpretations that return. we connect, we develop rapport, we commiserate, we become a community, and it all “resonates deeply,” to use a favorite term. but nothing happens in the research: there is no “thwarting of previous expectations,” gadamer’s now famous criterion for having any kind of experience, or dare i say, research “worthy of the name.” we may know more, as a result of the study, but do we understand differently? have we been clear about and committed to the difference? it seems to me that far too often, as researchers, we conduct our research unscathed, our viewpoints remain--expanded perhaps, but fundamentally intact. put differently, the inquiry turns out to be event-less. it constitutes research with others like the self, to find what we all deeply desire: the self-same. we ride our interpretive horses around the hermeneutic ranch without the experience of, in husserl’s evocative phrase, “being thrown from the saddle.” i think we have drifted too far away from the “life force of being,” (phusis) that ought to show up in our work, what heidegger repeatedly described as the gleaming, glistening, glimmering, glittering, glowing that is the manifestness of being to humans--the phos (light) at the very core of phainesthei (spontaneous emergence of the truth of being)—that calls forth from us wonder and astonishment and great joy, brightens, lightens and opens us, inclines our thinking toward thanking. (capobianco, 2014, p. 37) mixed (up) paradigms, approaches, and methods i use the phrase “mixed up” here, a little tongue in cheek, in three senses: first, there is a proliferation and confusion of approaches, paradigms, and methods within the so called “paradigm” of “qualitative research.” second, this condition exists within even a single tradition like phenomenology. third, it seems to me that there is a growing tendency to throw or stitch traditions together, in too many cases hastily and naively, and call the result “a mixed methods approach.” there is a kind of repetition at work here –manifesting itself in different ways. field journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 5 4 the first sense of mixed up comes from using the term “qualitative” to represent or claim a singular paradigm (given, 2017), or a “unified field” (denzin & lincoln, 2005). i cannot see how qualitative research qualifies as a paradigm--much less a side in a war--if by paradigm we mean, a single “disciplinary matrix-commitments, beliefs, values, methods, outlooks, and so forth, shared across a discipline” (schwandt, 2007, p. 217). it is a mistake to think that “qualitative research” represents any kind of commonly shared ontology, epistemology, or cosmology, given the contradictory mix of positivistic and interpretivist approaches housed within, given the cacophony of incommensurate ideas about what constitutes truth, reality, the object of study, even who the researcher and the participants are. i think the variance “within” qualitative research is just as deep and broad as the variance “between” the so called qualitative and quantitative paradigms. put a little more strongly, and bringing the “fight” and the “fault” home, the war is within, and not just between. perhaps i am being too harsh in my judgement here, but i think the term “qualitative” has become meaningless in signaling anything of significance when paired with the word “research.” worse, its use causes confusion for anyone seeking insight into the nature of interpretive work, especially in understanding what constitutes good work that one could depend upon. the second sense of mixed up is a particular instance of the first, i think, and arises from a deepening plurality of approaches, even within a particular discipline like phenomenology. sometimes the so-called authoritative qualitative sources simply get it wrong. here is the definition of phenomenology from the sage handbook of qualitative research: “phenomenology brings the observer’s equipment to the fore and makes it part of the equation of meaningful construction and participation” (p. 1007). now whose phenomenology would that be? certainly not husserl’s, nor heidegger’s, nor sartre’s, nor merleau-ponty’s, nor gadamer’s. when did phenomenology, even when it took its interpretive, hermeneutic turn with heidegger, shift its attention from the life-world to “my equipment”? as readers, we do not know—there is not a tradition, or traditions, or a lineage of ideas/thinking laid out for us. instead, we get this laundry list of people that is supposed to count, at least in the index, as a definition: “phenomenology is a complex system of ideas associated with the works of husserl, heidegger, sartre, merleau-ponty and alfred schutz” (p. 27). yes, i agree, it is —and where is it that we get to see, and thus come to know, this “system of ideas”? it is nowhere to be found. the point is that even the folks who should know, our qualitative neighbors and friends, do not know, or if they do, then worse, they have treated phenomenology badly, have disrespected its traditions, and failed to acknowledge its revelatory power. if our friends do not respect us, why would we expect our “enemies” to? related to this is what happens in the field with phenomenological research, illustrated by the norlyk and harder (2010) study, which set out to answer the question: what makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? apparently, we cannot tell: the analysis reveals considerable variation, ranging from brief to detailed descriptions of the chosen phenomenological approach, and from inconsistencies to methodological clarity and rigor. variations, apparent inconsistencies, and omissions make it unclear what makes a phenomenological study phenomenological. there is a need for clarifying how the principles of the phenomenological philosophy are implemented in a study before publishing. (p. 429) field journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 5 5 there it is again—that feeling of hope and despair. hope for the “methodological clarity and rigor” that exists, but despair for the variations, inconsistencies, and omissions that make it impossible to tell what makes for good phenomenological work. heidegger’s (1999) charge comes roaring back across the ages: “phenomenological research has sunk to the level of wishywashiness, to the level of the philosophical noise of the day…everything absorbs phenomenology… it is impossible to make out anything [definitive] about phenomenology” (p. 58). i am not arguing for sticking to or striving for some kind of non-existent, unattainable purity in doing phenomenological work. nor do i think we should be enslaved by our traditions -context, purpose, and people matter, and should make a difference to the why, what, and how of interpretive work. but i worry about the loss of identity and sense of goodness that seems to be occurring. something is wrong when phenomenological work confuses phenomenologists. we do not do ourselves any favors by publishing work that is not rigorous and clear, and i am not talking about the lincolning and gubafication of interpretive work, i am talking about doing work where the goodness “gleams, glistens, glitters, and glows,” where it “opens us,” and where it “inclines our thinking toward thanking.” the third sense of “mixed up,” as in mixed methods, is constituted by the mixing of techniques (in-depth interviews and surveys), approaches (phenomenology and grounded theory are a favorite, for example), and philosophical traditions (in the former instance, german idealism and quibbling, symbolic interactionists). the latter “mix,” between barney glasser and richard strauss, was in trouble from the start, and tellingly, did not last. but i digress. the point here is that such mixes-number charts and narratives, concrete particulars and abstract categories, existentialism and positivism, practical wisdom and scientific propositions, are often tossed together, at will it seems. all of this is apparently accomplished by an increasingly popular hero figure in qualitative research, the free-wheeling bricoleur, a qualitative researcher licensed, somehow, to deploy “whatever strategies, methods, and empirical materials are at hand” (lincoln & denzin, 2005, p. 4), someone who “stitches, edits, and puts slices of reality together” (p. 5). note: “the bricoleur explores the use of ethnography, pinarian currere, historiography, genre studies, psychoanalysis, rhetorical analysis, discourse analysis, content analysis, ad infinitum” (kinchloe, 2001, p. 687, my emphasis). in this superhuman capacity for ad infiintum, marvel at the bricoleur, the perspective-shifting, place-shifting, tradition mixing, tool-wielding, nietzschean “oberman,” an “action-hero” if ever there was one. should we be asking what it is that disciplines or should discipline the seemingly all powerful bricoleur? to whom or what do they answer or serve? what is it, if anything, that interrupts their will to power? does the “thing itself,” the world, have a voice, or vitality, or integrity that we need to preserve and be in the service of? to what extent does the world compose us, or are we the all-powerful “mix-masters”? where is the commitment from the bricoleur to “becoming indigenous to place” (kimmerer, 2015, p. 205)? on the other side of this, pointing not to the mixer but to the mixed, is the question of what is it that is being mixed? how? what does the mix produce—is it a whole or just the sum of disparate, conflicting parts? or am i being naïve here is something whole and integral too much to ask field journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 5 6 for in this post-modern, post-human, and now, post-truth world? has any sense of what bennett (2001) called “cosmological coherency” been abandoned? has the “fractured future” arrived, as denzin and lincoln (2005, p. 1123) claimed it would, and is it here to stay? if we are confused and fractured why would anyone look to or depend upon us? i do not agree with charmaz (2006), however popular she has become, when she attempts to stitch grounded theory together with constructivism and, in doing so, claims to be “marrying two contrasting and competing traditions” (p. 6). in such cases, we all should be asking, what kind of marriage is it that is based on competition and contrast? is it a marriage at all, or just conflictridden co-habitation? do in-depth interviews produce the same kind of knowledge as likert scale surveys? do they proceed from the same assumptions about the way human beings are? do they treat the object of study the same, or are there different objects of study entirely? do the mixes and mix-masters simply add up-is that what the verb “to mix” means? is “mixing” the right thing to do at all? i do not think so. i want to be clear: seemingly different things do fit together, numbers can inform interpretation, or vice-versa, for example. but i do want things to be carefully braided or woven, and not simply mixed or loosely stitched. i want fine cloth to be the result, and not some hastily sewn together swatches of wool and polyester. most importantly, i want the braider/weaver to be able to explain, as all good weavers can, the why, what, and how of the weft and the weave. a wonderful example of this, where the research traditions are carefully, knowingly, and respectfully combined, in startling, poetic fashion, is robin kilmmerer’s (2015), braiding sweetgrass: indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teaching of plants. it gleams, it glistens, and it shines forth. forfeiting ground to the march of “constructed, multiple realities” and “small t” truth there is also, embedded in this representation of the qualitative researcher as the bricoleur, the image of a reality constructed wholly by humans, a world of what latour (1993) calls quasi – objects, apparently subject to slicing, editing, and stitching according to human will. this is the problem that frightens me the most, and is the most life-threatening, in my opinion. it arises, partly at least, from playing it fast and loose with notions like “reality” and “truth.” the term “multiple realities” has become quite popular in the literature on qualitative research (see the assertion, commonly expressed in the theories of constructivism, for example). in most instances, i see it asserted, but rarely scrutinized or clarified, much less justified. i am afraid of statements, by researchers claiming to do interpretive work, like this: “the way we as researchers come to know reality constructs the reality we come to know” (usher, 1996, p. 39). hmm--what is it that the term “reality” refers to here? additionally, this seems to me to be a vicious circle, not a virtuous one, with no way out. even if there was a way out, how would we know if we simply and only construct the reality we know, and we can only know the reality we construct? forgotten in talk like this is the way history and reality construct us. are we prepared to give history, and the animate world, with its life-giving gifts, their due, and call them all constructivists? but hang-on, whose world, and whose reality am i talking about here—are there not multiple realities? field journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 5 7 my first encounter with the notion of “multiple realities” was with alfred schutz (1967), in his work on the phenomenology of the life world. schutz had something specific in mind when he used the term— “as finite provinces of meaning” (p. 232). he did not mean separate, distinct mental states, multiple, individual consciousnesses, or entirely separate, independently existing worlds. there was no “this is my reality” and “that is your reality” with schutz. that is, he was careful and discriminating when he used the term: the finite provinces of meaning are not separated states of mental life in the sense that passing from one to the other would require a transmigration of the soul…they are merely names for different tensions in one and the same consciousness, and it is the same life, the mundane life, unbroken from birth to death, which is attended to in different modification. (schutz, 1967, p. 232) quite often the “multiple realities” talk is paired with assertions like this in qualitative work: “there is no ‘big t truth’ anymore, it is all ‘little t truth.’” in the face of a statement like this, i want to ask: whose “little t” truth is the truth and reconciliation commission’s? is that a mistake in the title, flowing from an erroneous ontology it should be a small t instead of a capital t? should we treat what we are hearing in the testimony about the genocide of a people, as just one version of the truth among many versions? because if this is true, then what is my ethical obligation to the other and the call to action? if it is just “their truth,” how am i enjoined to and by the other, as ricoeur (1992) asked, “over and above my willing and wanting” (gadamer, 1960/ 1996, p. xvii) to respond? let me try to come at this a little differently. what truth is gadamer (1960/1996) calling for when he asserted that i should know myself such that “the text can present itself in all its otherness, and thus assert its own truth” (p. 269)? and what truth is it that gadamer speaks to when he asserted that the critical task of hermeneutics is “to know what is asked by the distinction in operating between true prejudices or those which guarantee understanding, and false prejudices, which bring in misunderstanding,” (quoted in grondin, 2003, p. 89)? is this just another “little t” assertion, or is it the case, because i have “my own truth,” that i get to decide that what gadamer is referring to is just one more “little t” truth among many? the trouble is that individuals, with their “own reality”, and their “own truth,” in an era of “post-truth,” do get to decide—that all muslims are dangerous, that women are second class citizens, that children are sketchy, deficient beings, that meningitis can be cured with hot peppers, onions, garlic, and horseradish, and that the world is simply there as standing reserve for our projects. but there are real consequences—there is that word again—culturally devastating, life, and planet threatening ones. so, at the risk of sounding like a closet positivist, let me make another bold claim: it is big t trouble that we are all in the face of our little t truths, because donald trump has been elected president of the united states, and we are living out our lives on a dying planet. admittedly, there is a complicated, dynamic relationship between big t and little t truth, one that needs to be carefully explored and worked through, but denying one and embracing the other does not get us any further down the road in deciding how to live well together on a planet and with people we are systematically degrading and extinguishing. but there i go again making big t claims. field journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 5 8 this brings me to the final (re)turn. i agree with the translators of the latest collection of gadamer’s work when they say: our societies are faced with this challenge where violence has become one of the arts of ‘praxes’ within traditional liberal democracies. this may be a challenge harder to face than the challenge of the sciences. can gadamer’s reading of history deal with alternate ‘readings’ and respond to them or engage them? (vandevelde & iyer, 2016, p. xxxv) how do we deal with alternate readings and understandings that are artfully and violently opposed? when interpretive conflict turns deadly, then what? should we all retreat into our own “little t” truths, or has this already happened? to some degree, i think it has. i see a real reluctance in interpretive work to defend any position fiercely and courageously, however dependent on time, place, and values it is, to draw a strong conclusion, even in the face of differing conclusions, to make any kind of bold ethical declaration about an “ought” or a “should,” however positional and contestable it might be. when we retreat, like a slow, fleeing army, from the world into the safe haven of “this is just my interpretation,” the “fading ethical intelligibility” (kroker, 2014, p. 43) of such a stance leads all too quickly to the ethical abandonment represented in the next set of statements: “who am i to judge?,” and “who am i to say?” the reasons offered for this kind of “refusal to be” are multiple: “it is hard to say, because it is all very complex,” and “things change so rapidly, that nothing holds,” and “there is no real solid ground anymore,” and “it all depends on your worldview.” i take all of these statements to be true, and i am not arguing for a lack of caution in making claims, or that tact and civility are not essential, or that being aware of the finitude and fallibility of being human is unnecessary, or that the claim the other makes on us is not tantamount to interpretive work, or even that it is not the case that truth occurs with untruth, to borrow from heidegger. but, by granting all of this, i do not think we have to make all our interpretations weak and wobbly in advance, or take back everything we say, in anticipation that we might have to change, or refuse to be bold, courageous, and evocative, because there might be another view. and please, please let us stop saying that we cannot generalize because our sample size is too small. how would we know, anyway? would that not require “a transmigration of the soul” (schutz, 1967, p. 232) to other places and times, to see and know if, in fact, what we had to say did or did not obtain? and have we not, in claiming this, made the kind of sweeping generalization that we were trying desperately to avoid in the first place? worse perhaps, does that mean we should put every sentence we utter in scare quotes? i understand that “giving oneself up to the argument of the other is an act of attentiveness” (davey 2007, p. 169), and that being attentive and open is a primary feature of interpretive work. i also understand that, in being attentive, something essential to hermeneutic understanding takes place in that “one is able to forget one’s own purposes” (gadamer, 1960/1996, p. 124). but i worry, especially in times like these, about “forgetting one’s purposes,” and constantly “giving oneself up to the argument of the other,” because it just might be that such a position, field journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 5 9 accepts, embraces and makes light of just what it should resist. it is tolerant of that which it should raise its voice in protest. it accepts just what it should defy. it lets violence off too easy. its notion of the justice of strife is that of a weak-willed judge. it has no nerve for a real fight, which means to resist the wasteful effects of suffering. (caputo, 1987, p. 285) perhaps it is time to consider what hermeneutics might look like in an era of post-truth, where the signs of a budding totalitarianism are unmistakable, in “a society whose members act and react according to the rules of a fictitious world” (arendt, 1948/1968, p. 62). perhaps it is time that any research “worthy of the name” of hermeneutics leads not to sunny skies and safe pastures, but to thunderstorms, as caputo, (1987, p. 214) has urged, steered not by the “calm hand that guides the ship through the waves” (gadamer, 1999, p. 246), but rather by heraclitus’s lightning bolt that flashes and takes our breath away (but does not make us run away). it is in this spirit that vandevelde and iyer’s (2016) posed their not-so-friendly question: “what is the nature of the revolution that hermeneutics, lying between philosophy and history, can foment” (p. xxxv)? references arendt, h. (1948/1968). the origins of totalitarianism, part three. new york, ny: harcourt. bennett, j. (2001). the enchantment of modern life: attachments, crossings and ethics. princeton, nj: princeton university press. capobianco, r. (2014). heidegger’s way of being. toronto, on, canada: toronto university press. caputo, j. (1987)). radical hermeneutics. indianapolis, il: indiana university press. charmaz, k. (2006). constructing grounded theory. thousand oaks, ca: sage. davey, n. (2007). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. new york, ny: suny press. denzin, n., & lincoln, y. (eds.). (2005). the sage handbook of qualitative research. thousand oaks, ca: sage. gadamer, h-g. (1999). heraclitus studies. in d.c. jacobs (ed.), the presocratics after heidegger (pp. 203-247). new york, ny: suny press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1996). truth and method (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. given, l. (2017). it’s a new year…so let’s stop the paradigm wars. international journal of qualitative methods, 16, 1-2. field journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 5 10 grondin, j. (2003). the philosophy of gadamer. montréal, qc: mcgill-queen’s university press. heidegger, m. (1988) ontology—the hermeneutics of facticity. bloomington, in: indiana university press. kimmerer, r. (2105). braiding sweetgrass: indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teaching of plants. minneapolis, mn: milkweed editions. kinchloe, j. (2001). describing the bricolage: conceptualizing new rigor in qualitative research. qualitative inquiry, 7(6), 679-692. kroker, a. (2014). exits to the posthuman future. cambridge, ma: polity press. latour, b. (1993). we have never been modern. cambridge, ma: cambridge university press. norlyk, a., & harder, i. (2010). what makes phenomenological work phenomenological? advancing qualitative methods, 20(3), 420-431. ricoeur, p. (1992). oneself as another. chicago, il: university of chicago press. schutz, a. (1967). collected papers, vol. 1. the hague, netherlands: martin nijhof. schwandt, t. (2007). the sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. los angeles, ca: sage. usher, r. (1996). textuality and reflexivity in research. in d. scott & r. usher (eds.), understanding educational research (pp. 33-51). new york, ny: routledge. vandevelde, p., & iyer, a. (2016). translator’s introduction: hermeneutics at the crossroads between history and philosophy. in h-g gadamer, hermeneutics between history and philosophy: the selected writings of hans-georg gadamer, vol. 1 (p. vandevelde & a. iyer, trans, pp. xvi-xxxv). new york, ny & london, uk: bloomsbury. microsoft word moules editorial 2019 corrected proof docx.docx corresponding author: nancy j. moules, rn, phd email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 18, 2019 ãthe author(s) 2019 editorial: “protecting” the sufferer nancy j moules dr. jon amundson’s paper entitled the special obligation of the sufferer that launches our 2019 issue of the journal of applied hermeneutics is an important and provocative hermeneutic endeavor to understand our relationship with suffering and with those who suffer. in his creative, interpretive, and insightful way, amundson invites us all to think about suffering differently and also consider those behaviors in which we embark, in “good faith,” to try to support the sufferer. he challenges those often superficial and distantiated efforts to offer support, as well as those over-indulgent, and overly “helpful” attempts, invoking deep reflection on our responses and our efforts to “do the right thing.” then amundson takes a step further, a step that at first startled me, putting the obligation on the sufferer to finds ways to make others know how to respond. it reminds me, however, of one of the most important learnings that i have had over the past year. i have a dear friend who has been in my life for 43 years, much more than half of my life. a few years ago, she was diagnosed with a life-shortening neuromuscular degenerative disease. although her progress through the disease has been slower than some, it is progressive and it has insistently, against her will, taken away important and meaningful aspects of her life. i love this friend and i wanted, more than anything, to be here for her (and to be honest, for me, as well) during these years but i ended up, in spite of my intentions, hurting her and, in return, learning one of the most significant lessons i have learned about suffering. i had been experiencing a rough couple of years with parental caregiving and then the deaths of both of my parents over a span of only 15 months. during this time, my friend would occasionally text me, trying to connect. i would respond in cursory ways, briefly, with no details of my life – responses that not only did not invite engagement but in fact discouraged it. my rationale at the time was: i cannot talk to her; i cannot tell her what my life is really like right now because my suffering is nothing compared to what she is undergoing. in my mind, it would have been selfish and self-centered to burden her further with my affairs when she was dealing with enough in her life. i was “protecting” her. moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 editorial 1 2 eventually, my friend called me on my apparent lack of interest in connecting, in staying engaged. i told her exactly how i felt about not believing i had the right to complain and burden her with my life because, in comparison to hers, my concerns seemed minimal (older parents die, that is expected; i should just deal with it). my friend was hurt, and angry, and responded to me in a way that has changed me forever. she texted: “so, this fucking disease has robbed me of so many things and now you’re saying it’s robbing me of the chance to be a friend?” in the privilege of friendship, perhaps what is more important than having a friend is being one. i had forgotten this and forgotten that someone can be suffering immensely but still want and need to hold on to those things in life that hold meaning and that make them who they are. she has always been a friend to me in some of my hardest times and some of my happiest but here i was taking that right from her, removing what lies at the heart of friendship: being able to be one. as amundson wrote, we often do not know how to respond to suffering and in particular to the sufferer and we resort to platitudes akin to “let me know if you need anything; if there is anything i can do…” but we also resort to mechanisms of misguided protection. in doing so, without open conversation, we make huge assumptions about who needs to be protected from what. gadamer’s notion of genuine conversation (1960/1989) is absent and, like the famous gadamer and derrida dialogue, we enter into a behavior based on a “conversation that never happened” (bernstein, 2008). intentions cannot be read or assumed; only actions are obvious. i might have said to her something as direct as “there is a lot going on in my life right now. are you up to hearing about it?” hermeneutics asks this of us, demands it. it asks that we move beyond what we assume, unquestion, take for granted, and believe to be true into being prepared to be taught, to listen, to overturn things, and understand that we all have obligations in suffering. references bernstein, r.j. (2008). the conversation that never happened (gadamer/derrida). the review of metaphysics, 61(3), 577-603. retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20130978 gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.; j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. microsoft word gallop corrected proof.docx corresponding author: cynthia j. gallop, phd email: cgallop@mtroyal.ca journal of applied hermeneutics july 17, 2013 the author(s) 2013 knowing nothing: understanding new critical social work practice cynthia j. gallop abstract individuals embarking on their journey to become professional social workers often state they feel as if they know nothing upon entering their practice. regardless of the number of years critical social workers have practiced, they are also thought to know “nothing.” by utilizing a philosophical hermeneutic approach i chose to recognize that new critical social work ideas, theories and practices come from something and somewhere (moules, 2002). this hermeneutic study involved interviewing six newly graduated social workers with a declared critical orientation. i asked these budding new professionals to describe what happens when they begin working in organizations that may or may not support a critical ideology and how this influences their practice. hermeneutic interpretations of the participant experiences suggest that this nothing is not devoid of meaning or method, but instead involves insinuating themselves and their ideas into their agencies in a delicate curvilinear manner. keywords critical social work practice, hermeneutics, research, social work practice exploring nothing one day while discussing my proposed doctoral project with a university instructor and colleague, she asked me why i would want to study the experiences of students or new graduates; “they know nothing,” she said. this word stayed with me for several weeks. it buried itself under my skin and wriggled about my consciousness. over and over, i asked myself how someone who works in an educational institution could say this about the individuals she sends out the door. why did we have these institutions if not to teach these new recruits something? yet, i recognized a truth to which she spoke. individuals embarking on their journeys to become professional social workers often gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 2 state they feel as if they know nothing upon entering their practicums, and later their practice. i have also heard this said about critical social workers because the theories are thought to be difficult to operationalize. critical social work practice involves adopting a political perspective and lies in the work of karl marx, antonio gramsci, the frankfurt school theorists, feminist theorists, and critical pedagogy theorist paulo freire. over the years, the term critical has come to define a number of distinct approaches, such as radical, structural, feminist, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive social work practice. as fook noted “…critical social work, as a coherent term, has only been used more explicitly in the last few years, mostly in literature from canada (e.g. rossiter, 1996) and australia (e.g. ife, 1997)” (2002, p. 124). in canada, critical social work theory and practice is closely identified with structural approaches developed by carniol (1979, 2005), moreau (1979), moreau and leonard (1989), mullaly (1993), and rossiter (1996). critical approaches to social work practice attempt to integrate professional social work values within personal, social, and political contexts (haynes, 1999). this approach to social work practice questions the validity of pathologybased social work perspectives and theories, and focuses on the oppressions that cause the private troubles or pathologies (rossiter, 1996). because of their suspicion and limited use of therapeutic models, graduates of critical schools are sometimes believed to be poorly prepared to directly improve their clients’ situation, compared to their clinical or generalist social work colleagues (sakamoto & pitner, 2005). regardless of what individuals call themselves upon graduation critical, generalist, or clinical they are all definitely seeking “something.” the word nothing originates from the old english word naping, which means “not one thing” (“nothing,” 2001). what became very clear to me after embarking on this research journey is that reality is not constructed ex nihilo but rather constructed from something. the form, organization, and something became my concern (pozzuto, dezendorf, & arnd-caddigan, 2006) for my doctoral research. still, i recognize that there is a substance to “nothing” that makes it difficult to articulate. i wanted to better understand why some forms of knowledge and practice are seen as something, and yet for some, critical practice might be seen as offering newly graduated social workers “nothing.” this paper is taken from one chapter of a doctoral work that attempted to understand both the nothing and the something of non-mainstream approaches to social work practice. in it, i found myself asking these questions: how might we understand how newly graduated social workers educated in a critical tradition experience their practice? what happens to these budding professionals when they begin working in organizations that may or may not support a critical ideology? do they end up pulling back into reserve and silence? do they acquiesce and become like-minded, or do they find new ways to practice that simply have not been captured by the research literature? given that mainstream social work and critical social work are informed by profoundly different ontological, epistemological, and political assumptions (campbell & baikie, 2012), the tension between these divergent understandings has also shaped the practice of social work. however, the growing neoliberal momentum toward theories and practices that bring order, predictability, and cohesion to our profession has begun to tip the balance in the social work profession in a manner that has had many in the field questioning who we are, and what we actually do. neoliberalism, which first began as a political economic practice, proposes that gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 human well being is best advanced by liberating individual entrepreneurial freedoms and skills (harvey, 2005). in post-secondary institutions, neoliberal practices include a curriculum focused on competency based practice approaches over theoretical practice, the marginalization of practicum or field education programs, and an increasing division between academia and the field (morley & dunstan, 2013). direct social work practice in a neoliberal context includes an overall devaluing of social work knowledge and skills, and a preference for hierarchical relationships between service users and workers over collaborative relationships. it includes privileging technical skills over structural analytic frameworks (dominelli, 1996; healy & meagher, 2004; singh & cowden, 2009). this neoliberal environment also influences organizational practices by insisting on open competition in the allocation of funding to services in order to encourage leaner and more effective programs (healy & meagher, 2004). most importantly, adopting a neoliberal ideology and framework has meant the field’s move away from emancipatory change toward an increase in governmentality and economics (healy, 2009; jones, 2005; madhu, 2011). the theories that have become dominant in social work lend themselves to a neoliberal understanding of social work practice by legitimizing this practice. theories such as cognitive and behavioral, social learning, and attachment theories are all derived from empirical research (olsen, 2007) and, as such, appear to be predictable and reliable. they are believed to help social workers really “know” the problem they are addressing, as well as the solution. as such, they are becoming embodied in our professional psyche as “common sense.” currently, this approach to practice appears to be the only thing that counts as something. for any way of thought to become dominant, and believed to be the only viable course of action, it must appeal to our intuitions and instincts, to our values and our desires, as well as to the possibilities inherent in the social world we inhabit (harvey, 2005). it then becomes so embedded in common sense, it is taken for granted and not open to question (harvey, 2005). any thoughts or actions that fall outside this dominant belief will eventually fade away to nothing. although our overall profession claims social justice and human rights are the ideological underpinnings of good social work practice, too many social service organizations have become so far removed from the ethics of social work practice that they are unable to adequately support the staff, management, and students who desperately yearn to make changes. while institutions themselves are not practices, they embody them, nurture them, and sustain them (chan, chi, ching, & lam, 2010). much of our meaning making in the western world involves characterizing things as much by what is lacking or absent as by what is present (“nothing,” 2008). nothing can also serve as a marker for the absence of something. some might say newly graduated students lack knowledge, or they lack a certain amount of skepticism. they have not been hardened off to the realities of real social work. some pundits argue critical social work does not seem to relate to those things that are valued as real. i began to wonder if what is missing is the lack of freire’s concept of hope. these students may lack the pessimism, and the deterministic attitude that things can never improve. perhaps what is not there in these new professionals is the despair that we relabel burnout. gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 re-discovering nothing similarly to critical social work, philosophical hermeneutics can be a difficult and unwilling concept to define. however, moran (2000) described it, and gadamer’s (1900-2002) contribution, fairly succinctly by stating “hermeneutics is the art of interpretation or understanding, and, for gadamer, always signifies an ongoing, never completable process of understanding, rooted in human finitude and human linguisticality” (p. 248). i specifically chose to use a hermeneutic research method because it aspires to understand the everyday meaning of lived experiences (bosma, 2011). it is a research practice that attempts to uncover both the differences and commonalities of lived experiences (benner, 1994), and helps us discover all aspects of what those experiences are like (van manen, 1997). even though it is often assumed to be part of the technical-rational approach, practical knowledge is based on practice experience, which is co-created (pozzuto et al, 2006). as such, practice theories may also be viewed as stories of cultural interpretation (rossiter, 2005). we interpret our lifeworld within the boundaries of what we know and what we believe can be done. this criticality encourages us to look beyond what we believe we already know, and what we believe to be true. philosophical hermeneutics is a form of research practice that attempts to reclaim and retrieve the humanist approach to understanding, which includes an emphasis on rhetoric, judgement, and common sense. “…this kind of understanding comes not in the form of scientific explanation (erklärung) but as cultural understanding (verstehen)” (moran, 2000, p. 280). new graduates are different from social workers who have been in the field for a number of years. new graduates are also different from students. philosophical hermeneutics is a form of inquiry that embraces tension, because it recognizes anxiety, stress, and strain as parts of a potentially transformative process. using a philosophical hermeneutic approach to research helped me explore the gaps that exist in our critical education and practice; the gaps between what newly graduated critical social workers know and what they can accomplish. becoming and being are never ending journeys in hermeneutics. it is always double-pointed, to what was and what will be, and encourages us to look beyond ourselves (davey, 2006). for this study, i chose to target new graduates from schools who have a mission and mandate that incorporates a critical social work framework. although there are a number of social work schools in canada that offer varying types of critical social work programs, i chose to narrow my focus to two schools: carleton university and the university of victoria. in addition to having mission statements and mandates that encompass a critical framework, bob mullaly (2007), a well-known canadian critical social work theorist, identified these schools as being critical and/or structural in their curriculum content and focus. individuals who graduated with a bachelor of social work (bsw) degree within the last three years, who self-identified as critical and were practicing from a structural and/or anti-oppressive perspective were invited to speak to me about their experiences in the field. i contacted individuals at both institutions in charge of the alumni and student communication list, and asked them to forward my recruitment poster through their email listserve. i received two participants using this technique from the university of victoria. unfortunately, this strategy was not successful at carleton university. i acquired the remainder of my participants by contacting colleagues working in either a university gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 5 or human service setting and through referrals from my current participants. i received two participants through referrals from social work colleagues, and i received two other participants through referrals from current participants. as a critical social worker, professor, and researcher, i entered this study as an active knower within the critical social work field. i am also female, educated, middle-income, a mother, and also formerly a child who, similarly to some of my study participants, knew what it was like to grow up in poverty and want more from the world. since it was not possible for me to ignore my past experience and understandings or pretend they did not exist, i needed to keep them at the forefront of my awareness. as such, it was important to ensure i used a process that involved writing my thoughts, feelings, and apprehensions in a journal as they arose. immediately after every interview, i wrote memos on how i felt the interview went. in these memos, i wrote my reactions to our conversation and whether i was surprised, unsettled, or delighted by something the participant had said. the use of reflexivity also involves acknowledging the researcher’s voice, but not putting it before the participants (leitz, langur, & furman, 2006). my professional position as an experienced social worker and professor meant that my vantage point of this topic could be quite different from that of the participants. i was aware that this position could be a hindrance, since my participants could see my knowledge and experience as having priority over their experiences and understandings. i knew i needed to create an environment where the interview experience allowed my participants to really say something to me. i did not want to overlook their claims, or attempt to assimilate them into mine (schwandt, 1999) and i recognized that if i became too dogmatic in my beliefs i would not be open to new understandings (lawn, 2006). i made a point of letting each participant know during the interview that, although i consider myself a critical social worker, it has been a long time since i have been a newly graduated one. i also let them know that this project was not meant to determine whether critical social work works, or does not work. instead, i explained as openly and honestly as i could that i wanted to hear what they had to say about this topic, even if they might say something which with i did not expect or agree. being reflexive allows us to be open to dialogue at times when there may not have been an opportunity before (ringel, 2003). i was very fortunate in finding three male and three female social work graduates who had been educated in a critical tradition eager to share their thoughts and experiences with me. with the exception of one participant who was in his mid thirties at the time of our interview, all of the new graduates who volunteered for this research project were in their early to late twenties. three participants, two male and one female, were graduates from the university of victoria, and three participants, two female and one male, were graduates from carleton university. two of the six participants from carleton had recently completed their master’s of social work from a noncritical university in ontario. one graduate from the university of victoria went back to complete her master’s thesis at the university of victoria during this study. although they all described different reasons for choosing a critical social work program, every participant stated they practiced from a critical theoretical perspective, and to varying degrees believed in the approach. all six participants were working either part-time or full-time in the field at the time of the interviews. the breadth of practice experiences was quite diverse given the small number of gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 6 participants. the new graduates worked in government and non-governmental organizations, small grassroots agencies and large bureaucracies. the participants occupied frontline, community-based, policy, and international positions. they also worked in children’s services, mental health, and the disability fields. data gathering the data gathered for this research included eight audiotaped interviews and eight participant emails. six of the emails were received from each of the six participants prior to each interview. each note sent by a participant contained an acknowledgement of interest in the project, as well as a brief reflective statement as to why he or she had something to contribute to this topic. two pieces of data were follow-up emails sent by participants who, upon further reflection after our interviews, wanted to share some of their thoughts or insights. although a majority of my participants did not live in calgary, i was fortunate enough to be able to personally sit with each of them for at least one interview. i approached my interviews according to the word’s original etymology, as someone entering new territory (“interview,” 2001). dialogue is not predictable (lawn, 2006). because it is unrehearsed, i had no way to decide in advance which effort would keep me from going in a direction that may not serve the topic the best (schwandt, 1999). although i originally developed eight questions that focused on the original intent of this inquiry, i remained mindful that much of the success of this study rode on my skill as an interviewer. the majority of the probes i employed could not be determined in advance, and were instead developed over the course of the conversation (koch, 1996). i also could not predict, in a semi-structured interview, where each participant might take the topic. in response to each social worker i interviewed, and the subsequent unfolding of the inquiry, i managed to slightly alter my question sequence, and introduce two additional questions. by the time i interviewed my last participant, i had changed the sequence of two of my questions, and included two additional questions around the participants’ own personal stories and reasons for choosing a critical school. i made these changes deliberately, and with great care. i was acutely aware that good interviewing in a hermeneutic study involves a careful balance between staying focused on the original intent of the inquiry, but not so focused that the practice becomes a routinized method, rather than a practice of understanding (binding & tapp, 2008). data analysis hermeneutic analysis is in itself an encounter. although the actual practice is difficult to communicate (addison, 1999), getting into the hermeneutic circle has been aptly described as an organic and iterative process (bosma, 2011) of focusing on the whole and the part. being in the circle is disciplined yet creative, rigorous yet expansive….in this process there is a focus on recognizing the particular, isolating understandings, dialoguing with others about interpretations, making explicit the implicit, and, eventually finding language to describe language. (moules, 2000, p. 47) my analysis began with listening to each interview and making notes. i then listened to the tapes again once i had the transcriptions. i reflected on the spoken words, the subtle pauses and lengthy silences. i also focused on the laughter. i wrote my thoughts and my impressions. once an idea or speculation surfaced, i would begin to journal my newly gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 7 forming thoughts. as an idea or word emerged that made me take note, i would also discuss it with colleagues and sometimes turn to the literature to explore it further. i read and listened to each transcript in isolation. i also read them in relation to other transcripts. to be clear, this back and forth between different tapes and transcripts was not meant to find themes. instead, it was my attempt to “…bring forth general impressions, specific and recurring ideas, and perturbing and distinctive resonances, familiarities and echoes” (moules, 2000, p. 46). i was looking for a revelation, a striking disclosure that surprised and unsettled me (“revelation,” 2001). i was seeking an experience that drew my attention to the unique (lawn, 2006). interpretive writing the process of making something foreign or forgotten understandable is achieved through the interpretive writing process. interpretive writing has been described as an exaggeration of what it wants to be heard (moules, 2000; d.g. smith, 1991). to exaggerate is to “heap, pile, load, fill,” to bring together, and carry toward (“exaggerate,” 2001). it is the process of making our words weightier and stronger so that we may more readily pay attention to them. it is a practice that involves creating meaning, rather than reporting meaning. similar to the analysis process of reading and listening, interpretive writing involves a circular movement where one action begins to uncover then build upon another. after listening to audio-tapes, reading text, and consulting peers and mentors, i began to take my memos and my notes and turn them into interpretive text. i found particular addresses in the transcripts and then explored them further, in classical literature, and research literature. i took these words and began to tie them together by moving back and forth between my participant’s understanding, my understanding, and the literature’s understanding. i used mythology and etymology to help me turn these words into richer meanings. establishing authority, trust, and credibility authority does not come from our position; it comes from what we bring to the relationship (gadamer, 1975/1989). it is the questions we bring and the things we open up that give us authority (lawn, 2006). ultimately, i can only ensure the authority and trust of my readers if i am able to achieve a plausible interpretation, namely, providing enough contextual information in my writings that others are able to make similar readings (koch, 1996). the findings of this project should speak to people, and make them consider things in a new way that they previously understood differently. to achieve this goal, i followed a process that included keeping a reflexive journal (koch, 1996), and i solicited feedback and engaged in hermeneutic conversations with my interpretive doctoral colleagues and mentors (koch, 1996). these conversations were very helpful. they pushed me further into the hermeneutic circle by helping me uncover interpretations i had not yet considered (plager, 1994). in addition, i conducted follow-up interviews with participants to clarify and expand on my developing interpretations. sometimes these inquiries were fruitless and led me in the wrong direction. however, i recognized, as researchers, we must be willing to go backwards and make mistakes, and trust that this process may at some point keep us from going in the wrong direction (gardner, 2006). all of these activities helped me be mindful that i was researching what i intended, and that my findings reflected the original research question and purpose (binding & tapp, 2008). in some forms of qualitative research, consulting participants at the analysis stage to gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 8 see if the interpretations reflect their original meaning ensures credibility. the quest to recapture the original meaning has obvious benefits in that it leads us to assume there can be one correct meaning. however, the difficulty with this theory is that it has not been able to adequately explain the history of competing interpretations that have existed, and continue to exist in the world. as such, this validation strategy is questioned in hermeneutic research and was not used in the study. rather than attempting to reproduce meaning, hermeneutics focuses on coproducing it. instead, credibility can be attained by allowing other readers to view the responses, not to provide an expert evaluation of truth, but as an opportunity to open the circle from the narrowness of my vision and preunderstandings. this approach to credibility honours the hermeneutic conviction that all questions can be answered differently, and these differences are generative in nature (moules, 2000). it also reinforces the hermeneutic belief that understanding is an adventure and, like any other adventure, is dangerous. because it is not satisfied with simply wanting to register what is there or said there but goes back to our guiding interests and questions, one has to concede that the hermeneutical experience has a far lower degree of certainty than that attained by the methods of the natural sciences. (gadamer, 1997/2007, pp. 243-244) interpretations of nothing to insinuate oneself to “insinuate oneself” typically has a negative connotation in western society, as it is often thought of in terms of something deceptive or unscrupulous. according to the oxford dictionary, to insinuate oneself means to gain a more favorable position through deceitful manipulation (“insinuate oneself into,” n.d.). yet, insinuate is the word one of the new social workers from this study chose when describing his efforts to practice in a critical way. once i investigated the original etymology of the word, i actually found it more fitting. it dates back to the sixteenth century and means to “bring in by windings and curvings.” it is the “entrance through a narrow way, an ingratiating of oneself” (“insinuate,” n.d.). the word insinuate is also connected to snakes and serpents. snakes have the potential for great destruction. their ability to remain concealed for long periods of time, and then strike without warning, inspires fear in many, not just their prey. the forked-tongue, which allows them to find and track their victims (schwenk, 1994), is also used as an analogy to speak untruthfully or deceitfully (“with forked tongue,” n.d.). however, the snake’s story is not entirely one of surreptitious violence. because of its ability to shed its skin in the spring, a snake also depicts rebirth. as with most disasters, there is always an opportunity for renewal. consequently, the serpent is an ambivalent image, depicting both destruction and violence, or rebirth and renewal (knox, 1950). as such, it is often used as “the figure for the animistic recovery of a larger consciousness” (s. smith, 1991, p. 202). what has been recovered in this study is an understanding that practicing in a critical way is no longer simply seen as an experience of rising up and striking down. instead, a new understanding of emancipatory practice is emerging. it is that i really had to think differently about the role of leadership – of existing leadership and existing power structures – in affecting structural changes…like i think that when i first learned about this stuff, like i kind of thought there would be … like clients or like front line workers gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 9 rising up and, like, taking the reins of the system and making all the changes and everything, but the more of it i meet, like … i don’t meet very many clients in this job, i more meet front line workers, and the more obvious it is that they are like … even the most dedicated and passionate ones are really struggling just to like, to get through their big, thick work load, you know?...and like, even the ones who probably identify structural or like take the aop [anti-oppressive practice] stuff to heart, they talk like extensively about how difficult it is to put these things into practice and find … like find footholds and get support within their organization beyond lip service... this understanding of practice involves new critical social workers finding various footholds and slowly insinuating their theories and practice into conservative ideology and practices that are also insinuating. destruction and violence: neoliberalism as an insinuating practice a part of the philosophical hermeneutic project is to study how things in the world appear and at the same time are covered up. the greek referred to this study of reality and truth as aletheia. it is the dis-closing, uncovering, and dis-covering that which has been concealed. it is both the hiding and the revealing of the things themselves (moran, 2000). understanding the insinuating nature of domination and oppression is also an exercise in re-discovery. hannah arendt, a student of martin heidegger and karl jaspers, and a contemporary of hans-georg gadamer, was deeply impacted by the totalitarianism and destruction of the first half of the twentieth century. arendt proposed that philosophy emerges from the discrepancy between the world of appearances and the medium of words that support thinking. she discussed the problem of totalitarianism, and believed that it would only be possible in a modern society if “…everything – including our sense of reality – is managed” (moran, 2000, p. 299). arendt believed language becomes a powerful tool in the maintenance of the status quo through the use of rhetoric. because it relies on the art of persuasion, rhetoric is the ability to generate belief without knowledge. it also has the capacity to organize and discipline disparate individuals and groups (fontana, 2005). as such, arendt was very concerned with spin-doctors and speech manipulated by corporations in order to dominate our public space (tremblay, 2003). although western nations pride themselves on their dedication to freedom and democracy for every individual, in reality we may not be as unshackled as we believe. curving and winding: deconstructing and reconstructing discourse like arendt, gadamer also spoke of rhetoric and common sense, sensus communis, however, gadamer did not see these concepts as completely negative. instead, gadamer defended rhetoric by reminding his audiences that it has been a part of our social life since the days of plato and the sophists, when persuasion and public speaking were art forms. these were the days when rhetoric was part of a culture that created new and important understandings. as such, gadamer approached both common sense and rhetoric as necessary in the development of a community (krajewski, 1992), in that community is “…built not by the ‘true’ but by discussions of the ‘probable,’ and rhetoric deals in the ‘probable’ when proof is unavailable or inadequate” (krajewski, 1992, p. 346). the underlying assumption in gadamer’s rhetoric is that both actors enter into a genuine discourse, and no one person is meant to control the conversation. to be involved in gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 10 this type of genuine dialogue requires both a stance of indebtedness and critique, as well as trust and acceptance (moran, 2000). this becomes problematic when individuals and groups in positions of authority and power introduce jargon and euphemisms into the conversation. when doublespeak becomes part of the dialogue, the potential for a genuine event of understanding is eliminated, as is the possibility for transformation. the oxford dictionary defines doublespeak as “deliberately euphemistic, ambiguous, or obscure language” (“doublespeak,” n.d.). it is the communicative art of being able to appear non-influencing, while being influencing (epstein, 1999). one of the new critical social workers in this study appeared to understand his practice in terms of an aristotelian tradition of rhetoric. he definitely had an opinion, and wished to convince the service user of his thoughts and views. however, his practice was still an invitation in that he had made it accessible to the other by un-covering and re-vealing the underlying meaning of the document they were studying. …and so my role as advocate really becomes explaining in more accessible language for clients what their rights might be… i will help explain – what my understanding of what [the government organization] is asking for, and what is this question really trying to get at? this question is basically wanting to know whether or not your depression affects your ability to shower every day, and to what degree. which most people don’t understand, and they read the way the questions are worded – and the same with the disability tax credit and a lot of the other things i help people with – it is really worded with the assumption of someone having a physical ability and applying for these things, not having a mental health disability. and so, “oh no, i can physically get up and shower. yes, i physically can make dinner.” and i am, “yah, no, that is not what they are asking,” right? i get them to fill in the form but i make sure and i help them to understand, “well no, what they want to know is your depression or anxiety so debilitating that you are just not able to”? and they are like, “oh, well, yes,” and then they can answer that question. they are not lying and i am not telling them to lie, i am just helping them re-understand or better understand the question. what the participant has also just demonstrated is fook’s (2002) description of translation. this is a practice where “workers might see part of their role as transforming bureaucratic culture by valuing and translating between different discourses” (pp. 147-148). it is the practice of naming different terms or categories in order to alert people (in this case a service user) to different perspectives (fook, 2002). this new social worker became the interpreter by un-covering and re-vealing the doublespeak that was driving a bureaucratic agenda. at the same time, he was engaging in a dialogue that has the potential to create a new understanding of what it means to be someone living with depression, as opposed to someone who is diagnosed as depressed. this understanding moves beyond the beliefs held by the bureaucratic agency that created the mental health checklist. curving and winding: creating space in addition to concentrating on language and systems of oppression, a great deal of hannah arendt’s work focused on the possibility of creating space for action. for arendt, the term action referred to the activities of humans that can only be conducted once the demands of life have been met, such as a stable world within which they can achieve both group identity and solidarity (dietz, gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 11 1994). it is the collective condition where individuals are dependent on one another in order to achieve their true existence. similar to gadamer’s requirements for having a genuine conversation, action is an activity that comes from without and, as such, can only exist in the world with others (williams, 1998). it represents the activities needed to fend off our rising alienation (dietz, 1994). arendt was very concerned with how modern society limits or restricts the space required to achieve action (moran, 2000). as such, arendt wrote considerably about the need for citizenship and participation in democracy, which in greek is known as polis. “for arendt the greek polis opened a space where humans could freely interact with one another” (moran, 2000, p. 312). it is the space between people, or the condition that is needed for democracy and human freedom. it is the space where an emancipatory action may appear, and be recognized by the public (moran, 2000). over the years, our polis, our space that exists between people and groups, has been reducing in size. in reality there is very little space left in the field of social work, just enough for technical fixes. the limited space has also made it more likely that the social work profession will focus on individual problems. when an individual who is seeking support is given the messages “‘you can do it, you can have it, it is up to you to pull yourself together to get the skills, to learn the stuff, get on with our life, do it!’” (epstein, 1999, p. 10), there is very little room for democratic action. given the limited space to exercise citizenship and democratic participation, arendt was acutely aware that not everyone is capable of action, since it involves risk. this is the “real world” box that many of us, at various stages of our lives and practice, find ourselves in. instead, individuals who are inclined toward action are those who want to make a new beginning (moran, 2000). critical social work students are taught the importance of attempting to understand and create this democratic area. they are taught that their job requires more than just inquiring into someone’s life (chambon, 1999). transformative knowledge and practice is meant to disturb commonly held beliefs and ways of doing. this action of creating democratic space involves engaging in a practice of working within and against the rules. the winding and curving of critical social work practice is an attempt to create the space to maneuver in the real world. it is the space through which to negotiate the hegemonic and destructive forces. as many know, organizational change is never easy. however, this new social worker described his practice of creating opportunities for new understanding at the management level of different human services agencies. and they had a webinar for senior managers and they were using my research in the thing which was really cool and really nice to see them, like quoting sentences, so that is nice. but yah, folks said they really found it helpful and picked up ideas, you know? every once in a while i will get a newsletter from an agency or a set of agencies that are merging and they will say, “look, we read your thing and this is what we came up with.” he was also able to create some space in his own small, but growing organization. now we are a very small organization and i was the third employee they hired – they are only about four years old – so i’m currently working with a consultant to write all our organizational policies because we don’t have any policies yet, because until a couple of years ago it was gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 12 all being run out of my boss’ living room. yah! it was like a very small …and they … so i have been trying to work like equity based policies into the policy framework so the organization has some… you know, it is a small thing, like three people, but i think that is good to try to … try to … because that is going to be the institutional memory to some degree, so i have been able to insinuate myself into kind of a critical junction in the organizational development. yah, so i have been trying to slip ideas that i think are really important into the framework… so i will say, “hey, what about this? should we do this? should we have some kind of socially responsible investment policy?” and he will say, “yah, why not? let’s do that.” this participant was able to insinuate his critical ideas at an opportune time in other organizations and his own. specifically, he was able to create space for critical ideas by identifying parts of the organizational system that were open to influence. in the business community, this is called a high impact strategy, which is meant to overcome organizational apathy and inertia (godkin & allcorn, 2008). he understood that it was important to act now while the organization is small and still developing. to wait meant his organization might be at risk of developing a policy memory that is solely focused on neoliberal ideology. curving and winding: approaching from the bottom and the top because there is such a strong focus on social justice in the critical social work field, there can be a risk for those practicing in the field to assume the moral high ground, and conceptualize critical practice as a war in which there are only two sides, those who are in favor of social change, and those who oppose it. this is what fook (2002) called “dichotomouus thinking” (p. 72). it involves practitioners constructing the self as the binary opposite of the other. this type of thinking can be quite harmful since it divides us all into enemies and allies. as noted by the participant below, he appeared to understand the need to avoid oppositional thinking. despite some of the critical social work rhetoric he faced while in school, he managed to elude understanding his practice as an us versus them, or bottom versus top approach. instead, he focused on searching for the opportunity for a slight transformation. often the movement is small, a slight twist or bend. it is almost imperceptible. … well i guess another bias that i picked up at [the critical school] was like an aversion to marketing and like anything that has to deal with the business side of social service stuff. i had a prof who was really, really good at it – the prof i had at [a non critical social work program] was really good –…something she was really big on was marketing your skills as a social worker, and really taking that step to brand yourself essentially…now this was like in the context of health social work or places where social workers are like guests in the system, like hospitals. and…like, a lot of people don’t know why we are at hospitals and a lot of staff at hospitals don’t really understand why social workers are there. and from what i understand there is a lot of, like, i guess, there is just a lot of tension. and social workers often feel like they have to justify why they are there and that brings a lot of resentment, i guess…yah, so her whole thing was if you are going to be in a place like that you can’t expect, you know, like a doctor who is given all the power and all the glory to just get why you are there. and you have to like, actively identify people who don’t get it and who are powerful and like, get them on your side, you gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 13 know? show them why you are valuable in terms that they can understand why you are valuable, which is really like a kind of … it is using all your social work skills in a professional context, right? so i thought that was really, really brilliant because if … if you want to increase the … i think social workers have a lot of … we have a lot of like, value to bring to any workplace and especially the ones where people don’t think we are valuable. you know, where people aren’t in crises all the time. this participant is actively engaging in changing the perception of some individuals who are in positions of power. to do so, he appears to understand he needs to use the methods of the “enemy,” such as branding. according to the online business dictionary, branding is a business marketing process that involves “…creating a unique name and image for a product in the consumers’ mind, mainly through advertising campaigns with a consistent theme. branding aims to establish a significant and differentiated presence in the market that attracts and retains loyal customers” (“branding,” n.d.). in this case, the participant was focused on creating an image of a social worker as a valuable asset to any organization, whether the agency is involved with acute cases or not. in addition, he understood he needed to target individuals in positions of power and authority in order to spread this message to others and create a loyal following. this new social worker described several instances in his practice where he curved and wound his critical practices and knowledge around the exclusionary practices of his hierarchical and bureaucratic organization by utilizing mainstream methods his audience could appreciate. rebirth and renewal: shedding rarely is destruction seen as a positive or hope(ful) proposition. however, hannah arendt spoke of the hope or opportunity that comes at the end. she believed that “…every end in history necessarily contains a new beginning; this beginning is the promise, the only ‘message’ which the end can ever produce” (arendt, 1951, p. 478). in order to challenge existing hegemony and achieve ideational change, a new philosophy is needed, one that involves deconstructing and challenging our own power and authority as social workers, and reconstructing it to be productive (healy & leonard, 2000). transformative practice approaches the current hegemonic state as inherently social, rather than natural (robinson, 2005), and as such recognizes that it can be changed. similar to its philosophical ancestors, critical social work practice is also focused on rebirth and transformation. “a critical reflective approach holds the potential for emancipatory practices (fook, 1999) in that it first questions and disrupts dominant structures and relations and lays the ground for change” (fook, 2002, p. 41). a part of freeing ourselves from hegemonic forces is expending an effort to free us from gramsci’s “common sense” (robinson, 2005), as this participant demonstrated when she questioned other social work colleagues’ sense of fatalism the belief that the world has been, and will always be, the same. [social workers] often think of what is available, which is never enough. it is never going to be adequate and it is not … it is not okay to stop there and i think that if we stop dreaming big and actually saying, “this is what the people need”, rather than, “this is what you can have”, there won’t ever be changes. right? gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 14 gramsci discussed the possibility of transformative practice in his concept of “good sense.” it is the critique of common sense that comes from within the subaltern group that has escaped dominant philosophies. good sense is too minimal to create a new philosophy (robinson, 2005), but it has a criticality that allows for disruption of common sense and the current status quo. as such, good sense may be seen as the starting point to something larger (robinson, 2005). it is “the beginnings of the new world, rough and jagged though they always are…” (gramsci, 1971, p. 343). it is the type of sense-making activity that brings the promise for something more. rebirth and renewal: rebuilding similar to gadamer’s genuine conversation, the consciousness-raising process is meant to be a mutual one, based on respect and a genuine desire to impact and be impacted by the other. consciousness-raising involves sharing expertise, learning from one another, and joint action (allan, 2003). critical social workers are taught to approach this type of practice from a voluntaristic, rather than deterministic, stance (fook, 2002). when working with colleagues, the practice involves negotiating multiple meanings, and recognizing the many different ways of knowing and understanding. most importantly, it involves having an attitude of respect and excellent active listening skills (allan, 2003). all of these practices involve the subtle, small, but deliberate, movements that expose the falseness of the view of the world from the top. when people are debriefing or discussing, or writing case notes that is where i think that my skills kind of pop up and that is where i start going, “well did you ever think about this”? … like there was one kid and they were all talking about how they couldn’t believe that the mom – she was a single mom – was reading her six – six or seven [year old] – stephen king novels, and that was his bedtime stories and there was a lot of pathologizing going on over what kind of mother she was, blah, blah, blah. so i just kind of threw it out there, “well have you ever thought about the fact that maybe” – they were in extreme poverty – “she can’t afford to buy numerous books? she is either …” – they were an indigenous family – “… maybe she was never raised in a family where they had children’s books read to her so maybe she doesn’t actually even make that connection that, you know, they might be [inappropriate], or maybe she is struggling so much the only time she gets to read or stop and sit down” – because the kid was super hyperactive – “she wants to read her own book because she is sick and tired of reading kid’s books and the kid will only sit down if she is reading to him so she reads him her books, and she is just not making those connections that stephen king is a little gory for a six year old.” you know? it might not be that she is actually trying to harm her kid, or a neglectful parent, or whatnot. like there might be misunderstandings or lack of resources, like there are all these other options and she might just need to be redirected that, “here is a few children’s books, why don’t you read these to him”? you know? “or help him”? you know? “you do half an hour of reading with him and then he has to figure out some time he can do something on his own so that you can read for half an hour.” so just little miniscule things. the “little miniscule things” means having the will to question or resist dominant discourses, and create the space to encourage others to follow suit. as fook (2002) suggested, these destructive discourses are only as gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 15 powerful to the degree to which they go unquestioned. in this case, the participant rejected the “bad mother” discourse and searched for other plausible explanations. she also found the space to encourage her colleagues to see the possibility of a different interpretation. this is the conversation that has the potential to transform a “bad mom” into a human being in need of a bit of time, and a few resources. this critical social worker was attempting to create a new understanding, one where the perspectives of individuals on the margins are no longer subjugated or disruptive, but instead are the perspectives that are also constitutive and primary (hartsock, 1990). instead of searching for a totalizing solution or grand fix, the “little miniscule things,” the slight action, or the small questions might become the opportunity for rebirth and transformation. new critical social work graduates, because of the limited expectations others have for them and they sometimes have for themselves, in some ways have the luxury of moving in small steps, rather than always expecting to save the world in one heroic leap. it is more about making space in the world than it is about completely altering the world in which we are. a study conducted by whitmore, calhoun, and wilson (2011) investigated the question “how do you know you are making a difference?”(p. 437). this was an advocacy project focused on changing policies, laws, practices, and improving citizen engagement in canada. in this study, the researchers found their participants were also keen to celebrate all small endeavors in an effort to avoid getting bogged down by the bureaucracy and uncertainty of their work (whitmore et al., 2011). these new critical social work graduates appear to understand that there is no complete and total fix to our current world state. while always in motion, their movements are deliberate, slow, undulating. perhaps the movement inspires more of a hybridization of our current understanding, instead of understanding their practice as something that must fix the world, or save others. a new critical understanding of practice might include reflexive deconstruction and reconstruction motions. this is an understanding where critical social workers might act as both translators and scholars interested in having a genuine conversation. although they are wary of the ideology and practices of those in positions of power, it is also a practice that includes using some of the mainstream tools to overcome the problems of subjugation. finally, this understanding might help new graduates find some satisfaction with the small movements, while still looking for opportunities for greater change. postmodern critical social work approaches have refocused from broader political and structural problems, to more local forms of change in an effort to allow more individuals and groups to be part of the continuum of social change. these small-scale localized activities are still respected for their radical potential. in addition, structural approaches to social work practice do not endorse one particular way of working over another. this is due to “…a dialectical view that the personal and political are fundamentally connected, working with individuals, families, groups, organisations and communities are all regarded as containing possibilities for practice” (allan, 2003, p. 53). as with the serpent analogy, there can be no dichotomous understanding here. although there is overt and covert manipulation and destruction, there is also the opportunity for new growth and transformation through the slow, steadfast curving and winding through our current reality. although these small insinuating movements are effective at weaving through gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 16 contrary and dominant ideology and practice, they are always at risk of being lost or scattered without the opportunity to build social cohesion and combat isolation (allan, 2003). one of the great merits of a neo-liberal ideology is its ability to ontologically hijack ambivalent or diffused agendas (carey, 2009). in order to continue these small insinuating movements, perhaps what is needed is more opportunity to discuss these “little miniscule things” with other like-minded social workers. this might be the only opportunity for these little dialogues to turn into more comprehensive conversations, and bigger ideas. finding something the question of nothing can only arise if there is already some understanding of what “it” is (bowie, 2010). as such, the field of social work may not necessarily be concerned with what new critical social work graduates are, but instead what we can do with them. many critical social work educators …strive to facilitate learning environments that privilege: the active creation of collective knowledge over the passive giving and receiving of pre-determined knowledge; contradiction over certainty, surfacing assumptions over learning “the facts,” searching for understanding over finding the truth; exploring questions over finding answers; staying with discomfort over seeking comfort; dialoguing over debating; working collaboratively over working competitively. (campbell & baikie, 2012, p. 78) still, we know the educational practices are falling short of this ideal due to pressures to conform to neoliberal ideology, epistemology, and practices. unfortunately, for the new critical social work graduates, much of what they can do does not fit into a neat knowledge application box. perhaps we are fools to believe we are looking at nothing. instead, human service organizations or social workers steeped in a neoliberal mindset might simply be blind to what critical social work graduates are, and what they have to offer. specifically, margolin (1997) has argued “…that social workers blind themselves to how professional practice perpetuates and expands social injustice in order to do what we do” (as cited in olson, 2007, p. 60). individual social workers and human service organizations that are steeped in neoliberal ideology and practice are powerful in their stance and pursuit of conditions of certainty. however, their persistence has not eradicated other ways of knowing and other ways of practicing. philosophical hermeneutics helps us recognize that the self exists in a multiplicity of unfathomable and unstable relationships. because of the nature of our current understanding of reality and perspective, many who are blind might not be aware of this type of non-mainstream presence (davey, 2006). as such, for some who are blind, the practice experiences of critical social workers have no essence. as a field, we might have also blinded ourselves. however, there are those who are willing to see this nothingness as something other than a vacuous abyss. for these individuals, this space might be interpreted as a generative one, as aletheia. it is a space that makes room for the emergence of new interpretations and new practices. references addison, r. (1999). a grounded hermeneutic editing approach. in b. crabtree & w. miller (eds.), doing qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 145-161). thousand oaks, ca: sage. gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 17 allan, j. (2003). practising critical social work. in j. allan, b. pease & l. briskman (eds.), critical social work: an introduction to theories and practices (pp. 52-71). where, australia: allen & unwin. arendt, h. (1951). the origins of totalitarianism. new york, ny: harcourt brace jovanovich. benner, p. (1994). the tradition and skill of interpretive phenomenology in studying health, illness, and caring practices. in p. benner (ed.), interpretive phenomenology (pp. 99-128). thousand oaks, ca: sage. binding, l.l. & tapp, d.m. (2008). human understanding in dialogue: gadamer’s recovery of the genuine. nursing philosophy, 9, 121-130. bosma, h. r. (2011). (re)visioning wholeperson care: an interpretation of the health care experiences of culturally diverse persons living with a life-limiting illness. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). the university of british columbia, vancouver, bc, canada. bowie, a. (2010). german philosophy: a very short introduction. new york, ny: oxford university press. branding. (n.d.) business dictionary.com. retrieved from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition /branding.html campbell, c., & baikie, g. (2012). beginning at the beginning: an exploration of critical social work. critical social work, 13(1), 6781. carey, m. (2009). happy shopper? the problem with service user and carer participation. the british journal of social work, 39(1), 179-188. carniol, b. (1979). a critical approach in social work. canadian journal of social work education/revue canadienne d'éducation en service social, 5(1), 95-111. carniol, b. (2005). case critical: social services and social justice in canada. toronto, on, canada: between the lines. chambon, a. (1999). foucault’s approach: making the familiar visible. in a.s. chambon, a. irving, & l. epstein (eds.), reading foucault for social work (pp. 51-81). new york, ny: columbia university press. chan, e. a., chi, s. p. m., ching, s., & lam, s. k. (2010). interprofessional education: the interface of nursing and social work. journal of clinical nursing, 19, 168–176. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: state university of new york press. dietz, h. (1994). hannah arendt and feminist politics. in l. p. hinchman & s. k. hinchman (eds.), hannah arendt: critical essays (pp. 231-260). new york, ny: state university of new york press. dominelli, l. (1996). deprofessionalizing social work: anti-oppressive practice, competencies and postmodernism. british journal of social work, 26, 153-175. doublespeak. (n.d.). oxford dictionary online. retrieved from http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ameri can_english/doublespeak gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 18 durst, d.c. (2005). hegel’s conception of ethical and gramsci’s notion of hegemony. contemporary political theory, 4, 175–191. epstein, l. (1999). the culture of social work. in a.s. chambon, a. irving, & l. epstein (eds.), reading foucault for social work (pp. 3-26). new york, ny: columbia university press. exaggerate. (2001). etymology online. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allow ed_in_frame=0&search=exaggerate&searchm ode=none fontana, b. (2005). the democratic philosopher: rhetoric as hegemony in gramsci. italian culture, 23, 97-123. fook, j. (1999). critical reflectivity in education and practice. in b. pease & j. fook (eds.) transforming social work practice: postmodern critical perspectives (pp. 95-208). london, uk: routledge. fook, j. (2002). social work: critical theory and practice. london, uk: sage. gadamer, h.g. (1975/1989). truth and method (2nd ed.) (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h.g. (1976/2004). philosophical hermeneutics (30th anniversary ed.) (d.e. linge, ed. & trans.). berkeley, ca: university of california press. gadamer, h.g. (1997/2007). the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (r. e. palmer, ed. & trans.). evanston, il: northwestern university press. gardner, f. (2006). using critical reflection in research and evaluation. in f. white, j. fook, & f. gardner, critical reflection in health and social care (pp. 144-155). maidenhead, uk: mcgrawhill education. godkin, l., & allcorn, s. (2008). overcoming organizational inertia: a tripartite model for achieving strategic organizational change. the journal of applied business and economics, 8(1), 82-94. gramsci, a. (1971). antonio gramsci: selections from his political writing (a. hoare & g. nowell-smith, trans & ed.). london, uk: lawrence and wishart. hartsock, n. (1990). foucault on power: a theory for women? in l.j. nicholson (ed.), feminism/postmodernism (pp. 157-175). new york, ny: routledge. harvey, d. (2005). a brief history of neoliberalism. new york, ny: oxford university press. haynes, d. t. (1999). a theoretical integrative framework for teaching professional social work values. journal of social work education, 35(1), 39-50. healy, k. (2009). a case of mistaken identity: the social welfare professions and new public management. journal of sociology, 45(4), 401-418. healy, k., & leonard, p. (2000). responding to uncertainty: critical social work education in the postmodern habitat. journal of progressive human services, 11(1), 23-48. healy, k., & meagher, g. (2004). the reprofessionalization of social work: collaborative approaches for achieving professional recognition. british journal of social work, 34(2), 243-260. gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 19 ife, j. (1997). rethinking social work: towards critical practice. melbourne, australia: addison-wesley longman. insinuate. (n.d.). etymology online. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allow ed_in_frame=0&search=insinuate&searchmo de=none insinuate oneself into. (n.d.). oxford dictionary online. retrieved from http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ameri can_english/insinuate?q= insinuate+oneself+into#insinuate__2 interview. (2001, june). etymology online. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search =interview&searchmode=none jones, c. (2005). the neoliberal assault: voices from the frontline of british state social work. in i. ferguson, m. lavalette, & e. whitmore (eds.), globalisation, global justice, and social work (pp. xx-xx). london, uk: routledge. koch, t. (1996). implementation of a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing: philosophy, rigour and representation. journal of advanced nursing, 24, 174-184. knox, b.m.w. (1950). the serpent and the flame: the imagery of the second book of the aeneid. the american journal of philology, 71(4), 379-400. krajewski, b. (1992). traveling with hermes: hermeneutics and rhetoric. city, ma: university of massachusetts press. lawn, c. (2006). gadamer: a guide for the perplexed. new york, ny: continuum. leitz, c., langur, c. l., & furman, r. (2006). establishing rigor in qualitative research in social work: implications from a study regarding spirituality. social work research and practice, 5(4), 441-458. madhu, p. (2011). towards a praxis model of social work: a reflexive account of 'praxis intervention' with the adivasis of attappady. available at ssrn 1766270. margolin, l. (1997). under the cover of kindness: the invention of social work. charlottesville, va: university of virginia press. moran, d. (2000). introduction to phenomenology. new york, ny: routledge. moreau, m. (1979). a structural approach to social work practice. canadian journal of social work education, 5(1), 78-94. moreau, m., & leonard, l. (1989). empowerment through a structural approach to social work. ottawa, on, canada: health and welfare canada. morley, c., & dunstan, j. (2013). critical reflection: a response to neoliberal challenges to field education. social work education: the international journal, 32(2), 141-156. moules, n.j. (2000). nursing on paper: the art and mystery of therapeutic letters in clinical work with families experiencing illness. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. moules, n.j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes an ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods 1(3), 1-21. gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 20 mullaly, b. (1993). structural social work. toronto, on, canada: oxford university press. mullaly, b. (2007). the new structural social work (3rd ed.). don mills, on, canada: oxford university press. nothing. (2001, june). etymology online. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search =nothing&searchmode=none nothing. (2008, june). in wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. retrieved from www.wikipedia.org/wiki/nothing olson, j.j. (2007). social work’s professional and social justice projects. journal of progressive human services, 18(1), 45-69. plager, k. (1994). hermeneutic phenomenology: a methodology for family health and health promotion study in nursing. in p. benner (ed.), interpretive phenomenology (pp. 65-84). thousand oaks, ca: sage. pozzuto, r., dezendorf, p., & arnd-caddigan, m. (2006). social work and the colonization of the life world. critical social work, 7(2) [electronic version]. retrieved from http://www.criticalsocialwork.com revelation. (2001, june). etymology online. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search =revelation&searchmode=none ringel, s. (2003). the reflective self: a path to creativity and intuitive knowledge in social work practice education. journal of teaching in social work, 23(3/4), 15-28. robinson, a. (2005). towards an intellectual reformation: the critique of common sense and the forgotten revolutionary project of gramscian theory. critical review of international social and political philosophy, 8(4), 469-481. rossiter, a. (1996). a perspective on critical social work. journal of progressive human services, 7(2), 23-41. rossiter, a. (2005). discourse analysis in critical social work: from apology to question. critical social work, 6(1) [electronic version]. retrieved from http://www.criticalsocialwork.com sakamoto, i., & pitner, r. o. (2005). use of critical consciousness in anti-oppressive social work practice: disentangling power dynamics at personal and structural levels. british journal of social work, 35, 435-452. schwandt, t.a. (1999). on understanding understanding. qualitative inquiry, 5(4), 451464. schwenk, k. (1994). why snakes have forked tongues. science magazine, 263(5153), 15731577. singh, g., & cowden, s. (2009). the social worker as intellectual. european journal of social work, 12(4), 479-493. smith, d.g. (1991). hermeneutic inquiry: the hermeneutic imagination and the pedagogic text. in e. short (ed.), forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 187-209). new york, ny: suny. smith, s. (1991). the autobiographical manifesto: identities, temporalities, politics. prose studies: history, theory, criticism, 14(2), 186-212. tremblay, g. (2003). understanding multiple oppressions and how they impact the helping process for the person requesting assistance. gallop journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 21 in w. shera (ed.), emerging perspectives on anti-oppressive practice (pp. 381-392). toronto, on, canada: canadian scholars press. van manen, m. (1997). researching lived experience (2nd ed.). london, on, canada: althouse. whitmore, e., calhoun, a. & wilson, m.g. (2011). how do you know you are making a difference? advocates talk about the public policy process. the philanthropist, 23(4), 437-449. williams, g. (1998). love and responsibility: a political ethic for hannah arendt. political studies, 46, 937-950. with forked tongue. (n.d.). in oxford dictionaries online. retrieved from http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/englis h/forked?q=with+forked+tongue#forked__2 microsoft word morck corrected proof .docx corresponding author: angela c. morck, rn phd email: amorck@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 11, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 right there, in the midst of it: impacts of the therapeutic relationship on mental health nurses angela c. morck, rn, phd abstract mental health nurses are frequently confronted by intense emotions within the therapeutic relationship. in this philosophical hermeneutic inquiry, five mental health nurses were interviewed to extend our understandings of how nurses are impacted by the interplay with the often emotion-laden narratives of their patients. findings exposed the nurses journeyed between fluctuating needs to separate and protect their private from their work life. in order for this fluctuation to occur, they developed a sense of the world as requiring a sanctuary. this ontological place of home is the extent to which they felt safe and sheltered in order for this process of awareness of self as person and self as nurse to unfold. this research brings to the forefront the ways in which mental health nursing practice, education, and research are reciprocally moved by the practical day-to-day activities of being in therapeutic relationships. keywords mental health nursing, therapeutic relationship, hermeneutics, narratives, distress mental health nurses frequently confront situations in their work that elicit intense emotions in both their patients and themselves. nurses can unexpectedly find themselves in perilous territory. warne and mcandrew (2005) reminded us that it is the nurse’s responsibility to “acknowledge the complexity of the human experience and to navigate the therapeutic relationship” (p. 683). what happens, however, if the navigators find themselves in uncertain waters, in danger of being pulled under, or in peril of drowning in the intensity of emotions? my intent in this paper is to morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 2 provide an overview of the findings of my philosophical hermeneutic master’s research (morck, 2009) exploring the understandings, meanings, and processes by which mental health nurses take up and navigate the illness and life narratives of their patients. there was a focus on discovering the impact this position as listener of often emotion-laden narratives has on nurses and their ability to be present within the therapeutic session, and ultimately what the impacts are on the therapeutic relationship. background and literature review the relationship between nurse and patient is central to the practice of mental health nursing. this therapeutic relationship has been deemed the “essence” (forchuk, 2002, p. 93); “crux” (peplau, 1962, p. 53); “core” (college of nurses of ontario, 2006); and the “heart” (perraud et. al, 2006, p. 224) of the discipline. peplau has been credited as the “mother” of modern mental health nursing and bringing the nurse-patient relationship forward and central to practice (forchuk, 1994; tomey, 2006). the relationship between nurse and patient was developed in predictable stages and viewed as helping relationship wherein the exploration of the patient’s feelings and concerns leads to personal growth in both patient and nurse. the nurse remained aware of his/her own needs but there is a detachment of self-interest to become an agent of change for the patient (peplau, 1988, 1992; tomey, 2006). this belief is also reflected in the work of orlando (1961) who stressed the reciprocity of the therapeutic relationship and believed the nurse and patient represented a dynamic whole each affecting the other. travelbee extended and synthesized the interpersonal relationship theories of peplau and orlando (tomey, 2006). her work was an admonishment to the premise of remaining emotionally uninvolved with patients (shattel et al., 2007). the therapeutic use of self is a fundamental characteristic of a nurse and that a therapeutic relationship is deliberately and consciously planned. emotional involvement is necessary to establish a relationship; complete objectivity is neither possible nor desirable (tomey, 2006). beyond the phases and progress of the therapeutic relationship, what happens in the relationship has been explored in attempts to understand how it is helpful to the patient (forchuk & reynolds, 2001; hagerty & patusky, 2003; walsh, 1999). hagerty and patusky (2003) challenged forchuk and colleagues focus on the linearity and temporality of the therapeutic relationship with a reconceptualization on human relatedness. as in the broader psychotherapy stream, current nursing theory on the therapeutic relationship has become increasingly focused on integrative relational approaches situated in postmodern, social constructionist, and feminist perspectives. the therapeutic relationship has come to be viewed with a collaborative nonhierarchical stance that involves a weaving of the nurse’s expertise with those of the patient (wright, watson & bell, 1996). mental health nurses journey with, and learn from, people experiencing mental distress (barker, 2001). there is an interconnectedness of the relational commitment and an acknowledgement of self and other (hartrick doane & varcoe, 2007) and an appreciation of the moral space of the therapeutic relationship (bergum, 2004; macdonald, 2006). in alternate attempts to delineate components of the therapeutic relationship, other concepts studied have included empathy (hardin & haralis, 1983); connection (miner-williams, 2007; wiebe, 2001); commitment and involvement (morse, 1991); transference (evans, 2007); nurturance (raingruber, 2003); and boundaries of the relationship (austin, bergum, nuttgens, & morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 3 peternelj-taylor, 2006; milton, 2008). therapeutic relationships have also been explored in the context of a variety of patient populations, clinically depressed (beeber, 1989), and with suicidal individuals (sun, long, boore, & tsao, 2006). these studies, while emphasizing the importance of therapeutic use of self and the development of relationships with patients as the core of mental health work, do not address the meanings of the relationship for the participants, nor do they identify the skills that the nurses used to develop and maintain the relationships. while seemly central to mental health nursing practice, the therapeutic relationship has continued to remain elusive. nurse scholars have long attempted to portray and illuminate its complexity. while we know a great deal about what patients want and what nurses are supposed to do within in a therapeutic relationship, we continue to know very little about the meaning of this everyday experience for mental health nurses. the majority of current research has been conducted on the concepts held within the relationship. while these investigations have been vital in revealing the complexity of the relationship, they have failed to explore its meaning to, and impact on, mental health nurses. this gap opens space for an interpretive look into these phenomena through conversations with nurses who live within the everyday experience of the therapeutic relationship. research design method this research project was guided by the philosophical hermeneutics of hans-georg gadamer (1900-2002). gadamerian hermeneutics was chosen because it specifically seeks to understand and interpret language and experience. as a sophisticated research approach to understanding within the human sciences, hermeneutics has been shown to have invaluable applied utility (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015). gadamer asserted the task of hermeneutic understanding lies in the attempt to grasp the “unpredictable character of the spiritual and mental life of human beings” (gadamer, 1996, p. 165). i would further that so too is the task of mental health nursing. mental health nurses are situated in the midst of stories, of lives lived in shifting contexts, histories, and relationships. the given task is to navigate situational particulars, and through interpretation place these particulars into an understood whole (moules, 2000, 2002). as a broker of understanding (moules, 2000) the researcher is not considered separate from, nor a non-influencing factor of the research, but rather a vital component of the understanding offered. recruitment of participants after ethical approval was obtained from the university of calgary conjoint health research ethics board (chreb), participants were garnered through a purposive selection to provide a detailed rich encounter of their experiences with the topic. inclusion extended to any nurse registered with the college and association of registered nurses of alberta (carna) and presently working in the calgary health region in a mental health clinical practice area. five mental health nurses agreed to participate in this research study, met the inclusion criteria, and were interviewed. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 4 the field of mental health is a small community, and to heighten anonymity only a brief snapshot of the participant group is offered. all five were registered baccalaureate prepared nurses who received their training in canada. the length of their nursing practice varied from two to eight years. two of the participants came from other specialty areas prior to working in mental health; the remainder worked in mental health since the completion of their undergraduate degrees. all five participants have worked on in-patient hospital units with one participant now working in a community based out patient program. all five are women, in their late twenties to mid-thirties, with varied cultural, spiritual backgrounds, and beliefs. data generation after informed written consent was obtained, i conducted semi-structured interviews with individual participants at a mutually agreed upon time and location. each interview took between one to one and one half hours and was audio recorded. basic demographics of the participants were obtained at the time. the interviews were then transcribed verbatim into written text for ongoing analysis. field notes were written after each interview to capture contextual details and beginning interpretations. analysis and interpretation of data the process of data analysis and interpretation began with the research interviews. aligned with the tenets of philosophical hermeneutics, the research process was guided not by methodological procedures but rather by thoughtful systematic attention to the topic (moules, 2000; moules et al., 2015). the fusion of horizons provides a description of how understanding comes together. hermeneutics thus provides an opening into the understanding of an experience of something by being present and aware of the pre-understandings brought into a topic. the hermeneutic circle provides a descriptor of movements between the part and the whole. this movement from the specific to the general, from the general to the specific is an attempt to understand the whole in terms of the detail, and the detail in terms of the whole. it becomes a circular process of movement back and forth that leads to understanding (gadamer, 1989). reading, re-reading, and writing formulate an understanding of the parts and creativity is emergent with the reconstruction of the whole in a meaningful, purposeful, insightful way that offered understanding about the topic (jardine, 1992). the remainder of this manuscript offers an overview of select findings and interpretations. it ventures into the world of mental health nurses entwinement with the often emotion laden narratives of their patients. this venture necessitates a change of rhythm, tone, and form that matches these experiences. at this juncture, philosophical hermeneutics upholds and supports while giving way to the voice of the topic. interpretive analysis the shelter of home i think ...it is very important for nurses to be able to have these relationships with our patients and that it isn’t necessarily something that can be taught. i think it is one of those morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 5 things that you learn in the fundamentals of what a nurse-patient relationship should look like and you find your own way from there. mental health nurses journey with, and learn from, people suffering mental distress. in this process, there is a continual involvement and immersion in the narrative of others who are attempting to make meaning of what is happening to them (barker, 2003). these journeys, and the therapeutic relationships in which they dwell, are complex, dynamic, contextual, and full of impact. there exists no topographic map or perfect formula that can be taught and reproduced; it is rather about joint discoveries with our patients and finding our own way as nurses. finding our own way evoked, to me, a discovery journey of self and our place as mental health nurses in the world. it is also a journey of language, conversation, and uncovering new, or perhaps different, understandings of dwelling in the place of our patients’ narratives. ultimately, this journey as mental health nurses of the therapeutic relationship has been about finding a way home. what, however, is the connection between the concept of home and mental health nurses speaking about the impacts of the therapeutic relationship? i heard in their words the subtle, yet clear, call of wounded-ness. wound is related to the latin orificium meaning an opening or portal to a new way of understanding (oxford english dictionary, 1971). it was through this portal that the voices spoke of a struggle to find shelter from the onslaught of emotive narratives and of an impulse to return to a place of safety. to me, home is this haven in the turbulent seas of postmodern chaotic life. home embodies safety, the familiar, the comfortable, and ease. it anchors place, identity, and self by providing a locale perceived as ours (reinders & van der land, 2008). when however your chosen vocation is to listen to the painful, evocative, and often disruptive narrative of others this disruptive force can and does invade your at home way of living. there is no way coming into mental health i ever felt, i mean and maybe it wasn’t realistic, may be it was the idealizing of a brand new student, but did i ever think it would impact my home life this much? even knowing i was the kind of person to take stuff home, i never thought it would impact my life this much. this stepping into the life of another and the opening of your home, your being, to another is the working realm of a mental health nurse. people are constantly being confronted by life situations that cause disruptions to their comfortable, familiar, at home way of living (svenaeus, 2001). life’s stressors, large and small, positive and negative, have the potential to create unrest, concern, and distress. in this instance, the self as nurse was being brought home into awareness as self as person. henderson (2001) spoke of the recursive nature of the nurse-patient relationship, and of the inherent risks and rewards to both professional and personal self of this occupation of care. the therapeutic relationship was described as containing intrinsic tensions and pitfalls of emotionality that were left to the individual nurse to mediate. i think in this work you kind of need to for self preservation, you kind of need to be able to turn off or otherwise there is the risk of bringing it, all of that, information, or whatever it, whatever the word is for it, home with you. i can see how people would become overwhelmed and burdened if you can’t if you can’t leave that at work. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 6 preservation is the act or process of keeping something safe, or from injury, destruction, or decay. self-preservation is part of an animal's instinct that perpetuates survival. it is also a condition of being human. as humans we are subject to typical biological responses to threats (stress reactions, fight and flight, adaptation, and renewed homeostasis). pain and fear are parts of this mechanism. pain causes discomfort so we endeavor to stop the pain while fear acts as a warning to seek safety and protection from difficulties and danger (donatelle, munroe, munroe, & thompson, 2008). there was a need to keep safe and to seek shelter and a place of refuge from work. in this sense, preservation also afforded a sense of self-observation, watchfulness, and guardedness. there is also an element of covering, concealment, or camouflage in an attempt to diminish detection and the perceived threat to self. in this, the partition of self as nurse and self as person are separated and protected. with the shutting of the door a measure of self-protection is afforded in the holding of fears, anxieties, and worries of work at abeyance. there is a requisite need for separation and sheltering of the emotional self in the need to retreat homeward into a familiar way of being in the world (dreyfus, 1991). we filter our sense of refuge and self-preservation through cultural norms and social constructs. our sense of a niche of safety and respite, and how we can adapt ourselves to it, is formulated through our relationships with others and our community. to me, this is reflected in an etymological meaning of separate to understand. in this sense, separation is derived from old english understandan meaning to comprehend, or more precisely, to stand in the midst (oxford english dictionary, 1971). maybe it is avoidance of, or maybe it’s a way of retreating into your life, like okay, i need macaroni or whatever, right, because your life is a lot more safe than their life, because their life is scary. in retreating homeward and reviewing her life as safer than her patients’ lives, this participant was attempting to understand, to separate out her life in order to make sense of what was happening to her. as she reviewed the situation, she remained and stood in the midst of her relationship with her patient. through this search of discovery, and preservation of the house of our being, we learn to care about our home, not just its content, but also its context (svenaeus, 2001). when you provide treatment to someone as a nurse, you are offering to them comfort, care, and connection. if this is turned on self, in terms of retreating to a place of refuge, one can be seen as needing to retreat into self, to “lick one’s wounds in private” before reentering the community. this speaks to the fundamentals of mental health nursing that one must know oneself, reflect in order to reach out and be an effective nurse (peplau, 1988). additionally, we are called to know explicitly that this work will be challenging, not only in a physical sense, but also in a guarding of one’s house. home is thus a metaphoric foundation that provides us, as mental health nurses, a safe place to reflect, process, and honor the work of that day. fragmented images: reflections of home it’s so fascinating for me to reflect on myself and what do i think about the world and what do i think about my life. i think my biggest fear was that i would keep taking stuff home and i would just crumble, like, i would just be unable to cope with my own stuff now, in my own life. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 7 the work of a mental health nurse is situated in a face-to-face meeting with another through the medium of the therapeutic relationship. this requires a movement and opening of self and yet simultaneously a reaction toward self-protection may occur. to mitigate the intensity and sense of dis-ease that ensues, there may be an impulse to avert one’s gaze. this shielding of vision, as if peering through a mirror or window, assuages the images and creates a barrier (levin, 1989). while mirrors or windows are reflective and representative images, by design, they also refract and distort. in choosing to mirror one’s own life with the conflicted life of the other, a sense of protection is afforded in the distortion. this comparison with another caused this participant to reevaluate how she should be as a nurse. she began to review her conceptualizations of what it meant to be strong and protected. she saw value in opening herself and revealing part of herself to her patients even while being cautious of what this could mean for her. i think i used to feel like i don’t want to be vulnerable around patients because i need to be strong and they need to get help from me...now i feel like it’s okay to let them know that you’re a human being and that you have your vulnerabilities. vulnerability is often perceived in our western positivistic thinking as a frailty, a fatal flaw or weakness. it is related to the latin vulnerabilis, meaning to wound or open (oxford english dictionary, 1971). to levinas (1996), this opening of self, being susceptible to physical or emotional injury in being vulnerable, is the inescapable call revealed in the face of the other. this sense of vulnerability does not point to frailty, dependence, or loss of social autonomy. rather, it is connected to recognition of the suffering of another. we are signifying an openness and nearness available for the other. according to levinas (1996), it is the pivotal loci of responsibility for another human being. as nurses, we need to be able to listen to the otherness first in ourselves before we can truly be open to another. protection can thus be reconceptualized as a repetition of the ethical conditions of vulnerability and an “apriori proof of vulnerability itself” (frank, 2004, p. 48). intertwined in the therapeutic relationship, this vulnerability was evident in how nurses are influenced by their interactions with their patients. i don’t know how you work with people who have a mental illness and not end up taking some of it on, cause even as a human being you do that let alone someone sharing their most intimate insecurities and behaviors and thoughts. david hilficker, an american physician who left his prominent minnesota practice to work with the poor of washington d.c., has often written of his experience. in his attempts to respond to the wounded and chaotic lives of his patients, his own chaos was triggered. this has caused him to alter his perceptions of himself as a healer. “all of us who attempt to heal the wounds of others will ourselves be wounded. it is after all inherent in the relationship...in healing we ourselves take on the wounds of others” (hilficker, 1994, p. 39). hilficker perceived that we are all vulnerable beings, each harboring our own brokenness. while this brokenness inextricably binds and entangles us with one another, it does not diminish the risk (hilficker, 1994). rather, it morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 8 allows us to be open to the deserving values and responsibilities to the risks of being human (frank, 2004). this is, however, not an easy process. the ensuing anxiety and fear left this participant feeling exposed, open, and unguarded without shelter or defense. this is not what i signed up for. you want to help people, but i don’t want to be a victim in the process, and so i was just thinking, maybe i’m not psychologically strong enough for this job, maybe i’m just not cut out for this area. i just, i remember driving home thinking this isn’t for me; this isn’t what i want to do. whether or not she was cut out for work as a mental health nurse began to take hold, as she questioned her abilities, resilience, and competence at work. it reflects an inner questioning tension of “am i good enough, doing the right thing?” she began to only view herself as not fitting the social and cultural expectations of what a nurse is cut out and templated to be. many of the nurses in this research questioned their own competence and wondered if they could have or should have done a better job of protecting themselves form harm. we are encouraged as nurses to listen carefully to our patients to garner a full description of their history and situation. reaching the details of their stories involves “getting to know a patient as a human” (peplau, 1989, p. 218) and “talking with that person, in an investigative, purposive way, listening carefully, all the while being intellectually active and interested to know more” (peplau, 1989, p. 218). peplau (1962/1989) viewed the therapeutic relationship through a scientific lens in encouraging us to be objective, impartial, and to step back from the situation (gallop & o’brien, 2003; rogers, 1995). there exists a tensioned pressure of detachment yet demonstrative concern, interest, and care (henderson, 2001; vandermark, 2006). rogers (1995) claimed our language in mental health is laden with an us/them split. we, as nurses, behind the desk, hold the pretense of having no difficulties, while imploring our patients to discuss whatever issue holds our attention at any given time. she argued that it is this entrenched belief of “well nurse, ill patient” that has continued to foster the image of the self contained, unaffected nurse. beyond this, it is the nurse’s responsibility to not only navigate the therapeutic relationship but also to save both parties from the vulnerabilities, hurt, and losses that may ensue. she likened this scenario as the nurse being responsible for “holding two stories, or two plays, together” (rogers, 1995, p. 319). the juggling of these two stories, of nurse and patient, can become precarious and blurred. while the stories and situations are often emotionally charged, nurses are required to be attentive, attuned to hear the story, and provide safety through containing the story and the expressed personal suffering (gallop & o’brien, 2003; warne & mcandrew, 2008). this participant echoed this tensioned position in her encounter with a patient that left her feeling vulnerable. it was almost like a sense of weakness, if you get overwhelmed by the stories or what you see out there...there is some sort of weakness if you can’t handle it. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 9 becoming emotionally overwhelmed by a relationship with a patient was a weakness or frailty in her professional identity. this prevailing view of a professional nurse as detached and self-aware perpetuated her own doubts about herself as competent (dowling, 2006). the culture of mental health nursing has predicated a belief about the right amount of emotional involvement, with detached empathy and conscious rational detachment (henderson, 2001; warne & mcandrew, 2008). while there exists an acknowledgment that the therapeutic relationship affects both parties, the ideal remains for the responsible nurse to use theoretical concepts to guide the patient to health. the nurse remains depicted as a detached removed expert. this has fostered the belief that one is able to grasp this theoretical construct and has perpetuated the reluctance to acknowledge when things in the relationship are not as they should be (dowling, 2006; gallop & o’brien, 2003; warne & mcandrew, 2008). while protective, windows also distort and alter in their reflective projections. in entering mental health nursing, we have taken on a particular window that has wittingly and unwittingly become our lens on the world. lenses may provide protection or alter our perceptions without our being consciously aware of them doing so. we are always under this influence of history, and traditions of our chosen profession, situated in it and can not extricate ourselves from it (gadamer, 1989). homesickness and masked messages mental health nursing is not a landscape of black and white, or diagnostic certainty. rather, it is imbued with the rich vibrant colors that lie in-between, interlaced with infinite shades of gray. there is no map of the human psyche, no chart to follow to find one’s way through and back home. it can be an easy day’s wander, or a shared descent into black depths of human despair. it is a landscape filled with separation, and protection, where emotions and frailties of the human spirit are positioned against societal norms and expectations. can there be any wonder that those who wander this land become momentarily or otherwise overwhelmed? this is a land of paradox: of the need to open oneself up, yet keep oneself safe and separate, to maintain professionalism yet be vulnerable. it is, as warne and mcandrew (2005) articulated, working at the edge of the abyss. i question if, to be more precise, mental health nursing requires a jump into the midst of the abyss, in the space between realms. in this opening to other, and the inherent vulnerability, there is a wish to retreat to a familiar way of being, a place, we trust to be safe. homesickness is essentially the universal impulse to be home. in this premise, i am not referring to a physicality of home but rather the ontological search for a place in which being can be (dreyfus, 1991). the germanic heimlich, or canny, means familiar, close, while the not-at-home, unheimlich, or uncanny, means that which is out of the ordinary, unhomely, strange, and frightening. true home requires an effort to both embrace and ultimately integrate the heimlich and the unheimlich, the familiar and the strange in order to become more authentically at home with ourselves and the world (dreyfus, 1991; harries, 1978; woolley, 2007). in all professions and communities, there are teachers and inheritances. ghosts, strangers, tricksters, and monsters drift in the liminal. their presence is at times to scare us, at times to impose and unsettle, calling our attention to the particularity of their presence and arrival. they speak to teach us something of ourselves (jardine, 1994). according to kearney (2003) morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 10 most strangers, gods and monsters, along with various ghosts, phantoms and doubles who bear a family resemblance are deep down tokens of fracture within the human psyche. they speak to us of how we are split between the conscious and unconscious, familiar and unfamiliar. (p. 4) for freud (1919, cited in woolley, 2007), the not-at home experience of wandering in the liminal realm involved a perceived element of magic or supernatural. it is a return of the dead in spirit or ghostly forms to frequent ones home. it is a haunting. we don’t share these stories with each other about that client that made us want to leave mental health. there is this culture or code of silence around that sort of stuff. some how you will be viewed as inadequate if there was a client that kind of got on top of you like that. in the boundary-laden space of the therapeutic relationship, these participants had been affected and have wrestled with the inherent implications. according to them, a code of silence exists in mental health nursing. we do not speak about the negative impacts of the therapeutic relationship, nor its marks and impressions. this code of silence is a strong social relationship that functions to internally sanction and control, while evoking support from its members, the nurses. the most renowned version of a code of silence is the omerta of the italian mafia. omerta means manhood, and refers to the need for a man to resolve his own problems whilst maintaining a stoic silence (oxford english dictionary, 1971). the code of silence and the coinciding fear of being viewed as inadequate, incompetent, or lacking ability has marked these nurses. a code of silence functions by controlling and internally policing its members. a deviation from expected norms heralds a consequence and punishment. within mental health nursing, it has been shown that a key strategy for controlling nurses who deviate from socially acceptable norms has been to label them as over involved with their patients. additionally, nurses have been described as vulnerable, weak, or having their own psychiatric problems. these strategies, along with the maintenance of silence, have perpetuated the code upon the nursing profession (dowling, 2006; handy, 1991). several of the participants were besieged, haunted, by concerns of how they were being interpreted by their colleagues. according to them, to be considered incompetent threatens professional identity and integrity of self. nurses may perceive other nurses’ intimacy with patients as over involvement and thus deviant because of our socialization to believe so. there persists an inconsistency between theory and practice that may affect our identity and in turn impact those for whom we care. this may be evident in the rigid interpersonal behavior or in nurses distancing themselves. fear of disclosure of self and affective responses have encultured a uniformity or sameness. we, as individuals, can find or lose identity in social groups such as nursing. as a defense mechanism, the individual may become part of the collective think and therefore complicit in a collusive agreement of silence albeit often running below one’s level of consciousness (dowling, 2006; handy, 1991). i mean you have to put on a mask around here that you’re doing good work and you’re not experiencing any ill side effects because of it. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 11 this participant had learned that, in order to survive, she was required to repress her internal burden of feeling overwhelmed. she felt the need to mask, hide, disguise herself, and her internal fears that she was not doing good work. this was, at once, a protection of self to hide what she believed would place her on the outside of the boundary with her colleagues and place her in a vulnerable situation. she had become rote, mask-like, and hidden. her emotional face was hidden behind a pretense of professional competence and sameness. this sense of wearing a mask evoked to me a monere, or an omen or warning (jardine, 1994). while at once frightening, they are meant to provoke thought and challenge elements of the “taken-for-granted” (jardine, 2006). “like monsters in fairy tales, they wouldn’t whisper to us or stop us in our tracks if they didn’t have something to tell us” (jardine, 2006, p. 271). with it arrived an opportunity for me to reflect upon my own involvement with the demands of this topic and my history as a mental health nurse. “opportunities are not plain, clean gifts, they trail down dark and chaotic attachments to their unknown backgrounds, luring us further” (jardine, 1998, p. 154). the monsters that bring these openings to understanding need not look monstrous to teach (jardine, 2006). at times, monsters appear in the tear-rimmed eyes of a young girl. yesterday, such a monster came calling and demanded i retrace my steps and history. when i began my career as a mental health nurse, i felt totally inadequate in my ability to hear the stories of certain patients. i recall in my second week of work walking in to a room to find my patient huddled on the floor in the corner, a sharpened shard of glass running across her exposed wrist. she was silent, eerily so. i managed to convince her to hand me the glass and while i examined and bandaged her wrist she began to speak. she shared with me the image of her at five years old lying at the bottom of the stairs. her father and his friend had just finished raping her and were urinating on her tiny body. it was raining that day she said and today the rain falling outside her window smelled of urine. she kept repeating: “why can’t the rain wash away the smell?” she did not expect an answer. i certainly did not have one to give. that was not what troubled me. i did, however, struggle with keeping my presence with her, with listening to what she was saying and to resist the urge to run terrified from the room with fists jammed in my ears to stop the flow of traumatized hearing and the evoked images. over the years, the struggle quieted. i no longer felt the visceral impact of emotion overtake me. i congratulated myself in being able to push it away, place it aside. this image of my patient became just another story in a repertoire of pain filled stories of which i had been a part. i did not realize that i too had donned a mask. i had become a complicit silent partner, maintaining and perpetuating the code. i wore this mask with unseeing eyes, not realizing its presence or its influence in my relationships with my patients. yesterday, a trickster loosened the mask and it became visible. a young girl stared at me as she explained why “daddy hurt me down there” and then she began to scream. the haunting primal sounds were echoed by the trail of blood dripping from her face, and pooling in her lap. it was an image best forgotten, yet it lingered, played with me as i walked home. it brought me back to the beginning, to the call of this topic area and to the feeling, the impact, of being in that first room. after two months and pages of analysis, it beckoned. i had not realized how i had turned from the face of emotion until it would not stop looking at me. so here, in the in-between of self, my analysis began anew, with a monere, a lesson from hermes that broke open and shattered my pretense of skating the surface of relationship. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 12 filled with a sense of repulsion, of wishing to distance myself from the task, it was time to follow the lure down into the powerful current of relationship and follow the tears (jardine, 1994). masks hide us away, keep us separate but also hold in, hide, and perpetuate our suffering. with the opening of tears, we have discovered a portal to that which has remained hidden about our practice as mental health nurses. in this way, “dwelling with the stories that haunt us” (rashotte, 2005, p. 34) has the capacity to read us anew but also to bring us to places of untold danger. such is the paradox of the in-between. rather than accept the mask, we are called to interrupt our taken for granted experiences and to discover what lies beneath. in the realm of the liminal, in the in-between filled with monsters, ghosts, and shadowed teachers, the participants found themselves in new ways. they bumped up against themselves in an unmasking of emotional encounters within the therapeutic relationship. there had come a recognition that emotions stay close to home, exist in the being human, and in the ordinary day-to-dayness of being a nurse. it brings it back to being human because you are able to see that yes ok somebody else had this reaction as well. it is human, it’s ok or it is normal. this participant’s words have begun to reveal a conscious awareness of the dialectic between home and not at home, the canny and uncanny (woolley, 2007). it reveals the inherent paradox of being a listener of narrative as a mental health nurse, exposing self to anxiety, and the need to simultaneously protect self from the induced fear. the extent or measure by which we are able to unify the paradox of existence is the extent to which we are authentically home, gedankengang, the process of consciousness becoming home with itself and its environment (hayes, 2007). for the participants, this process of consciousness involved means of finding ways to cope with the anxiety and fear they faced in their ways of being in the world as mental health nurses. they were attempting to find a balance, as well, between home and work, familiar and unfamiliar. to me, this represents a quest for a return to a state of homeostasis, and recognition of the passages, potentials, and possibilities of finding self along the way. homeostatis: finding balance, finding home homeostasis originates from the greek homos meaning equal and histemi to stand. in essence, it is to stand equally so as to maintain a stable, constant condition (oxford english dictionary, 1971). to stand equally and be afforded a sense of equilibrium requires a contemplation of the finitude of our existence and an awareness of the possibilities of life. we are able to discover our own individuality, authenticity, and conscience through accepting and moving through, or despite, fear and anxiety (dreyfus, 1991). to gadamer (1996), this “equilibrium which we call mental health is precisely a condition of the person as a whole being who is not simply a bundle of capacities; such equilibrium concerns the totality of a person’s whole relation to the world” (p. 56). we are always living disrupted as a being in the world. each new episode that pulls us from our familiar and sets us to wander the in-between holds the potential to teach us about our selves and offers to navigate our way through and back to a sense of familiar and homeness (dreyfus, 1991; svenaeus, 2001). learning how we negotiate the leaving of home, the return, and the journey in morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 13 the in-between speaks to us of our wish to be authentic and genuine. to gadamer (1989), this is likened to becoming experienced, getting to know the landscape of mental health nursing, its hazards, joys, histories, and traditions. it also predicates that we are aware that we continually shift and live in the in-between of past and future. which each new situation, our past is redefined and our “future exists as a space in which the unfulfilled potentials of past understanding can be realized” (davey, 2006, p. 61). in this continual renewal of self and becoming experienced comes a discernment of one’s potentials as a nurse, but also an awareness of one’s limits and need to protect self. for this participant, there came an understanding that her energy and giving of self was finite. she needed to be able to extricate herself from a particular situation before she was overcome. k: he wanted me there and so i’ll sit there. at some point you do draw the line though, there are some people who want you to sit in their misery forever and you’ve just kind of get out of there and say i’m done. i’ve given you what i can give you today. a: and what is that like to say i’m done? k: that’s tough to say, because i’m here to help you but, i can’t sit here with you anymore in this hopeless, miserable place, and so i’m going to leave you here. and you feel like you’re kind of abandoning somebody in that place. a: so do you believe that that’s part of that discernment we learn about the wading in or the skirting around, is learning how to walk out of that place of misery? k: yeah. and i guess i really didn’t think about wading in as often. i was thinking about it more about wading into the past and wading into the traumas that have happened in the past, but sometimes you’re wading right into the present and, yeah, you have to wade in and then you have to figure out to get out. in her words, it was a navigation of knowing how to get in, to develop a therapeutic relationship with her patients, and then an awareness of when the work was complete, how she could get herself out intact. there is a sense of balance here of knowing she was responsible for the therapeutic relationship but at the same time aware of her own needs as a nurse and as an authentic human being. in this sense of equilibrium, of potential and limits within the therapeutic relationship, her abilities as a nurse were sustained and she was able to offer her patients lessening of their suffering. she realized she needed to find a way to get out, and to get the impact of the narrative out of her to enable her to re-enter the relationship with renewed energy. this is not balance as is commonly understood within western culture or nursing literature. it does not predicate a need to separate work from home life, or afford equal amounts of time to leisure activities to clear ones mind. this is a sense of equilibrium closer to the one gadamer (1996) brought forward as a sudden reversal of awareness. there is held within this view a connection to the buddhist sense of nothingness containing everything (vandusen, 1998). in the maze of narratives that exist in therapeutic relationships, there also arises recognition of the delicate balance of truly being at home. as mental health nurses, we listen to and are situated morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 14 in often-emotional evocative narratives with a patient. with each new arrival, our equilibrium is unexpectedly shifted and redefined as it tumbles over onto our at home way of being (gadamer, 1996). in this struggle to realign balance, there is a need to accommodate this new weight. this requires holding the narrative long enough to acknowledge and witness its presence but not so long as to injure self by its absorption into one’s being. this living of equilibrium and the swinging pendulum divide of separation and protection predicated a need to get the narrative out. for all five participants, this need to get the narrative or emotion out was consistent. i think one of the most important parts of mental health nursing is the other mental health nurses that are in the room just as much as you are, doing the things that you’re doing, and talking to them. we absorb the stories of our patients and what’s going on, but then we, we talk about it with each other. i think if you didn’t have that, nobody would survive this job. you need a strong team and you need the other people to hear you and relate. there is a sense here of us as mental health nurses holding the stories of our patients. as intimated, the stories are absorbed, held inside as perhaps could be equated to a vessel, bowl, or container holding something of value. helen bamber, who at the age of twenty left her sheltered london home to sit with the wounded skeletons of bergen belsen spoke of this idea of holding. she had no training, no experiences that could for her reconcile the images and words barraging her first days at the newly liberated camp. she recognized that what she could offer was her presence, and “to receive, not to recoil, not to give the sense that you were contaminated by what you have heard but rather that you were there to receive it all, horrible as it was and to hold it with them” (belton, 1999, p. 23). for the five nurses in this inquiry, the need to have others who understood their work, standing beside them, holding alongside, helped them endure and sustain their ability to be in relationship with their patients. it became a sense of holding the story together such that the burden was lessened. the rough ground of home i don’t think it gets carried by the listener the same way…it is the same thing where you just have to get it out… i almost think that part of that is coping. if you’re using humor to get it, get it out, if you’re angry... i don’t say that to that patient. none of that comes back to that patient and i can maintain my professionalism with that patient and i can also just kind of get it out and then become who i really am. we are always in the midst of becoming who we are. it is a journey of alienation, of going where we are not and returning changed. in this intertwining of narrative journeys, there arises recognition of the delicate balance of true home. it is a dynamic, rhythmic movement that is open to the future as a possibility of the past. there exists a difference of understanding the black and white of a given situation and the relevance and opening of understanding that comes with viewing the colors in-between. there is recognition that empty and full, separation and protection are not polarized opposites, but rather two sides of a swinging shifting arc of perpetual motion. to gadamer (1994), “being is more than simple ‘presence’,... it is also just as much ‘absence’, a morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 15 form of ‘there’ in which not only the ‘there is’ but also withdrawal, retreating and holding within are experienced” (p. 180). we stop at times along this movement journey. in times of deep suffering, or loss of way forward, we linger. perhaps it is in these times, when motion stops, or when the rebound of movement stalls that we feel stuck, or in the vernacular of mental health nursing, are “burnt out.” this sense of humanness, of becoming who we are and living our life, does not promise that we shall always be happy, or safe from harm and danger. rather, it forwards an authentic way of being at true home with self as nurse and self as person (dreyfus, 1991; gadamer, 1994/1996). there is a reciprocal relationship between the experience of being at home, canny, familiar, and the not-at-home, uncanny, unfamiliar. some of our most powerful experiences of “being” happen between the homes interior and exterior, in the in-between (dreyfus, 1991; harries, 1978; woolley, 2007). these stances are in continual flux, changing, striving, and creating self and those around us. they inform and establish our means of being authentic with ourselves and for those for whom we care. it is our encounters with others in language that we discover our historical, social, and traditional horizons and our home of meaning (gadamer, 1989; heidegger, 1962). it is also, too, in these moments of encounter and the openness of self that we are deeply vulnerable and subject to attack, wound, and suffering (davey, 2006). however, if we become open to suffering as inevitable to being human we may be afforded a portal to new experiences and understanding. in this way, suffering, or the sense of to undergo a situation, is how we might come to know the meaning of the human condition and develop compassion (caputo, 1987; hilficker, 1994). in order to be open to this flux of separation and protection, we develop a sense of the world as requiring a sanctuary. this ontological place of true home is the extent to which we feel safe and sheltered in order for this process of becoming to happen (harries, 1978; woolley, 2007). concluding thoughts the topic of this inquiry focused on the impacts of the therapeutic relationship as experienced by mental health nurses. in going into the everydayness of their practice, in the space they exist in relationship with their patients, i aimed to extend our understandings. further discourse about the meaning of the therapeutic relationship, and its impacts on not only the nurses’ home lives, but also their nursing practices brings to the forefront the ways in which nursing practice, education, and research are reciprocally moved by the practical day-to-day activities of being in therapeutic relationship. mental health nursing is a relational practice. beal et al. (2007) asserted there exists “no doubt that the therapeutic relationship creates the foundation for care, continuity and recovery. everything flows through this relationship. when the therapeutic relationship fails, it causes great pain, when it succeeds it is experienced as transforming” (p. 16). within the therapeutic relationship, there is a supportive space of listening created within which our patients can begin to make sense of their world and heal. it requires a commitment and a risking of self. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 16 there is an enormous amount of writing which concerns the therapeutic relationship in the nursing and psychotherapy literature. much of this writing has affected the professional practice of nurses. the concept of the therapeutic relationship that is mutual and reciprocal has found its way into nursing literature. however, as was evidenced by the way it was spoken to by the participants, there appears to be a gap between how it is understood and how the parameters and reality of mental health nursing allow it to be. with the legacy of detachment and emotional reserve, the tendency may continue for nurses to not share the stories with one another of how they are affected by relationships with their patients. with this, continues the feelings of isolation and hopelessness that were evidenced in several of the participants. we need to enable a place and space of safety to begin dialogues about these topics with one another. the code of silence and the mask of suffering need to be brought out from their shadowed corners and challenged. to not do so will continue to push to the boundary those who dare to speak of their suffering within the sanctum of the therapeutic relationship. these complex and often emotionally laden experiences of mental health nurses require consideration from continuing professional education, professional associations, and hospital administration for support and shelter. in these times of increasing patient acuity, nursing shortages, and an aging nursing population, there becomes an even greater need to protect these practicing nurses so that they do not, as many before them have, leave the doors of mental health behind (cna, 2008). references austin, w., bergum, v., nuttgens, s., & peternelj-taylor, c. (2006). a re-visioning of boundaries in professional helping relationships: exploring other metaphors. ethics & behavior, 16(2), 77-94. barker, p. (2001). the tidal model: the lived-experience in person-centred mental health care. nursing philosophy, 2(3), 213-223. barker, p. (2003). the tidal model: psychiatric colonization, recovery and the paradigm shift in mental health care. international journal of mental health nursing, 12(2), 96-102. beal, g., chan, a., chapman, s., edgar, j., mcinnis-perry, g, osborne, m., & mina, e.s. (2007). consumer input into standard revision: changing practice. journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 14(1), 13-20. beeber, l. (1989). enacting corrective interpersonal experiences with the depressed client: an intervention model. archives of psychiatric nursing, 3(4), 211-217. belton, n. (1999). the good listener: helen bamber, a life against cruelty. new york, ny: pantheon books. bergum, v. (2004). relational ethics in nursing. in j. storch, p. rodney, & r. starzomski (eds.), toward a moral horizon: nursing ethics for leadership and practice (pp. 485-503). toronto, on, canada: pearson education. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 17 canadian nurses association (2008). rn workforce profile by area of responsibility (2006 ed.) retrieved from www.cna-aiic.ca. caputo, j.d. (1987). radical hermeneutics: repetition, deconstruction and the hermeneutic project. bloomington, in: indiana university press. college of nurses of ontario (2006). practice standard: therapeutic nurse-client relationship (2006 rev. ed.). accessed from www.cno.org. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. new york, ny: state university of new york press. donatelle, r.j., munroe, a.j., munroe, a., & thompson, a.m. (2008). health: the basics (4th canadian ed.). toronto, on, canada: pearson education canada. dowling, m. (2006). the sociology of intimacy in the nurse-patient relationship. nursing standard, 20(23), 48-54. dreyfus, h.l. (1991). being-in-the-world: a commentary on heidegger’s being and time. cambridge, ma: division i. mit press. evans, a.m. (2007). transference in the nurse-patient relationship. journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 14(2), 189-195. forchuk, c. (1994). the orientation phase of the nurse-client relationship: testing peplau’s theory. journal of advanced nursing, 20(3), 532-537. forchuk, c. (2002). people with enduring mental health problems described the importance of communication, continuity of care, and stigma. evidence based nursing, 5(3), 93-97. forchuk, c., & reynold, w. (2001). clients’ reflections on relationships with nurses: comparisons from canada and scotland. journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 8(1), 45-51. frank, a.w. (2004). the renewal of generosity: illness, medicine, and how to live. chicago, il: the university of chicago press. gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed., j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshal, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. (original work published 1975). gadamer, h.g. (1994). heidegger’s ways (j. w. stanley, trans.). albany, ny: state university of new york press. gadamer, h.g. (1996). the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age. (j. gaiger & n. walker, trans.). stanford: stanford university press. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 18 gallop, r., & o’brien, l. (2003). re-establishing psychodynamic theory as foundational knowledge for psychiatric/mental health nursing. issues in mental health nursing, 24(2), 213227. hagerty, b.m., & patusky, k.l. (2003). reconceptualizing the nurse-patient relationship. journal of nursing scholarship, 35(2), 145-150. handy, j.a. (1991). the social context of occupational stress in a caring profession. social science and medicine, 32(7), 819-830. hardin, s., & halaris, a. (1983). nonverbal communications of patients and high and low empathy nurses. journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services, 21(1), 14-20. harries, k. (1978). fundamental ontology and the search for man’s place in heidegger and modern philosophy. new haven, ct: yale university press. hartrick doane, g., & varcoe, c. (2007). relational practice and nursing obligations. advances in nursing science, 30(3), 192-205. hayes, h. (2007). (be)coming home: an existential perspective on migration, settlement and the meanings of home. existential analysis, 18(1), 2-16. heidegger, m. (1962). being and time (j. macquarrie & e. robinson, trans.). san francisco, ca: harper (original work published 1927). henderson, a. (2001). emotional labor and nursing: an under-appreciated aspect of caring work. nursing inquiry, 8(2), 130-138. hilficker, d. (1994). not all of us are saints: a doctor’s journey with the poor. new york, ny: random house. jardine, d.w. (1994). speaking with a boneless tongue. bragg creek, ab, canada: makyo press. jardine, d.w. (1998). to dwell with a boundless heart: essays in curriculum theory, hermeneutics, and the ecological imagination. new york, ny: peter lang. jardine, d.w. (2006). on hermeneutics: “over and above our wanting and doing”. in j. kincheloe, & k. tobin (eds.). doing educational research: a handbook (pp. 269-288). rotterdam, the netherlands: sense. kearney, r. (2003). stranger, gods and monsters. new york, ny: routledge. levin, d. m. (1989). the listening self: personal growth, social change, and the closure of metaphysics. london, uk: routledge. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 19 lévinas, e. (1996). basic philosophical writings (a.t. peperzak, s. critchley, & r. bernasconi, trans & eds.). bloomington, in: indiana university press. macdonald, h. (2006). relational ethics and advocacy in nursing: literature review. journal of advanced nursing, 57(2), 119-126. milton, c.l. (2008). boundaries: ethical implications for what it means to be therapeutic in the nurse-person relationship. nursing science quarterly, 21(1), 18-21. miner-williams, d. (2007). connectedness in the nurse-patient relationship: a grounded theory study. issues in mental health nursing, 28(11), 1215-1234. morck, a. (2009). “right there in the midst of it with them”: impacts of the therapeutic relationship on nurses. unpublished master’s thesis, university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. morse, j.m. (1991). negotiating commitment and involvement in the nurse-patient relationship. journal of advanced nursing, 16(4), 455-468. moules, n.j. (2000). nursing on paper: the art and mystery of therapeutic letters in clinical work with families experiencing illness. unpublished doctoral thesis, university of calgary, ab, canada. moules, n.j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes: an ancestral, substantive and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods, 2(3), article 3, http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm. moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. oxford english dictionary (1971) (compact ed.). oxford: oxford university press. peplau, h.e. (1962). the crux of psychiatric nursing. american journal of nursing, 62(6), 50-54. peplau, h.e. (1988). interpersonal relations in nursing: a conceptual frame of reference for psychodynamic nursing. london, uk: macmillan education. peplau, h.e. (1989). interpersonal theory in nursing practice: selected works of hildegard e. peplau (a.w. o’toole, & s.r. welt, eds.). ann arbor, mi: springer. peplau, h.e. (1992). interpersonal relations: a theoretical framework for application in nursing practice. nursing science quarterly, 5(1), 13-18. perraud, s., delaney, k.r., carlson-sabelli, l., johnson, m.e., shephard, r., & paun, o. (2006). advanced practice psychiatric mental health nursing, finding our core: the therapeutic relationship in 21st century. perspectives in psychiatric care, 42(4), 215-226. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 20 raingruber, b. (2003). nurture: the fundamental significance of relationship as a paradigm for mental health nursing. perspectives in psychiatric care, 39(3), 104-112. rashotte, j. (2005). dwelling with the stories that haunt us: building a meaningful nursing practice. nursing inquiry, 12(1), 34-42. reinders, l., & van der land, m. (2008). mental geographies of home and place: introduction to the special issue. housing, theory and society, 25(1), 1-13. rogers, a.g. (1995). a shining affliction: a story of harm and healing in psychotherapy. new york, ny: viking books. shattell, m.m., starr, s.s., & thomas, s.p. (2007). ‘take my hand, help me out’: mental health recipients’ experience of the therapeutic relationship. international journal of mental health nursing, 16(4), 274-284. sun, f., long, a., boore, j., & tsao, l. (2006). a theory for the nursing care of patients at risk of suicide. journal of advanced nursing 53(6), 680-690. svenaeus, f. (2001). the phenomenology of health and illness. in k. toombs (ed.), handbook of phenomenology and medicine (pp. 87-108). dordrecht, the netherlands: kluwer academic publishers. tomey, a.m. (2006). nursing theorists of historical significance. in a.m. tomey, & m.r. alligood (eds.), nursing theorists and their work (pp. 54-67). st. louis, mo: mosby. vandemark, l.m. (2006). awareness of self and expanding consciousness: using nursing theories to prepare nurse-therapists. issues in mental health nursing, 27, 605-615 vandusen, w. (1998). wu wei: no-mind and the futile void in psychotherapy. in a. molina (ed.) the couch and the tree: dialogues in psychoanalysis and buddhism (pp. 52-57). new york, ny: north poin press (original work published 1958). walsh, k. (1999). shared humanity and the psychiatric nurse-patient encounter. australian and new zealand journal of mental health nursing, 8 (1), 2-8. warne, t., & mcandrew, s. (2005). the shackles of abuse: unprepared to work at the edges of reason. journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 12(4), 679-686. warne, t., & mcandrew, s. (2008). painting the landscape of emotionality: colouring in the emotional gaps between the theory and practice of mental health nursing. international journal of mental health nursing, 17(2), 108-15. wiebe, l.m. (2001). connection in the therapeutic relationship: sharing a subjective world. unpublished educational dissertation, university of toronto, toronto, on, canada. morck journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 2 21 woolley, j. (2007). home truths: the importance of the uncanny for patrick suskind’s critique of the enlightenment in das parfum. german life and letters, 60(2), 225-242. wright, l.m., watson, w.l., & bell, j.m. (1996). beliefs: the heart of healing in families and illness. new york, ny: basic books. corresponding author: david geoffrey smith, phd emeritus, university of alberta email: paramita@telus.net journal of applied hermeneutics february 1, 2018 the author(s) 2018 experience and interpretation in global times: the case of special education david geoffrey smith abstract this paper was delivered as a keynote address at the international symposium for qualitative transformation of the paradigm of educational practice and special education, busan national university, south korea, april 16, 2006. the symposium was sponsored by the korean research society for phenomenological and hermeneutic practice, and the research institute for special education of busan national university. keywords special education, interpretation, hermeneutics, experience, globalization, research theory, invalid “special education” is focussed on the education of those deemed special in some way. in english, the word special has many meanings, such as “outstanding or exceptional,” “specific rather than general,” “for a particular purpose,” “denoting education for children with particular needs, e.g., the handicapped,” “a special person or thing, such as a (police) constable or dish” (concise oxford dictionary, 9th ed.). what may be most relevant to the question of paradigm transformation in education, however may be the connection of the word “special” to the word “species,” from the latin specialis. if special education is in any way linked to species differentiation, the implication easily slides into considering people regarded as “special” to be a different kind of species than everyone else, than those who make up the norms of society. it is this implication that i wish to address here. it is an implication that cuts deeply into many of the historically derived philosophical assumptions underpinning western theories of education, such smith journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 5 2 as aristotle’s principle of non-contradiction (a cannot be a and b at the same time), and his theory of substance stating that a thing is most itself when it is disconnected from every other thing. the problem with this understanding of specialness is not only that it leaves people in their specialness, literally in their distinctive species categorization; the worse thing is that, in such a condition, special people lose their pedagogical capability, that is their capacity to address the world from a common ground. if you are deaf, you are deaf; if you are blind, you are blind; if you are deranged, you are deranged, gifted gifted, but so what? maybe “normals” can assist you in your deafness, your blindness, your derangement, or even your giftedness to help you to adjust to life with normals, but the fact that you are “species specific” means that there is a line dividing us that cannot be breached. just as you are most yourself in your blindness, your deafness, or your derangement, so the rest of us are “ourselves” in a completely different way. it is this way of thinking that needs to be deconstructed, especially in the context of “global times” wherein the current theory of “difference” provides a justification for imperial aggression against others seen as a threat to one’s own truth. being able to see the world as one, as a single reality, is a necessary condition for perceiving how it is that the strong and the weak, the rich and the poor, the healthy and the infirm all participate and share in an organic unity that now requires a new kind of theorization within the various domains of the human sciences including education. this leads to my second interest in the symposium title, “…the qualitative transformation of the paradigm of educational practice.” we know from the history of research theory that the turn to qualitative methods began around the mid 1970s. there was a reaction against the limits of what could be learned about human life through statistics and the methods of “rigorous science.” the development of the new human sciences drew inspiration from the neo-romanticism of nineteenth century germany, and philosophers such as wilhelm dilthey (1833-1911) and edmund husserl (1858-1938), which led to the existentialism of heidegger (1889-1976) and sartre (1905-1980), and the hermeneutic/interpretive work of h-g. gadamer (1900-2002). dilthey was the first to distinguish between the natural sciences (naturwissenschaften) and the human sciences (geistesvissenschaften). “nature we can explain,” he said, “but human life we must understand (verstehen).” such understanding should be built on a more concentrated attention to “lived-experience,” to how people actually experience their lives in the world before any theorizing about it. husserl’s famous dictum, “to the things themselves,” was a sort of battle cry against the metaphysical formalisms of immanuel kant, whose philosophy of idealism had dominated europe since the eighteenth century. it is from this root in german romanticism, then, that phenomenology, as studies of experience, and hermeneutics as interpretation of experience, arose along with later developments in narrative methods, ethnography, and other research approaches now generically termed as “qualitative.” i am trying here to contextualize qualitative research historically because of my conviction that we need to move beyond methodologism if we are to address the most pressing problems in education today, including special education. i tell my doctoral students that their most important research commitment should not be to “method” but to “interest.” in other words, what in the world is demanding your interest? following that interest will, itself, provide at least part of the answer for how it should be investigated. correct method cannot be determined in smith journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 5 3 advance of an encounter with the subject of interest – that is a central insight from gadamerian hermeneutic/interpretive philosophy. another reason for locating qualitative research in the tradition of german, or european, romanticism is because there are ethnocentric biases in it that impede an appreciation of a broader understanding of “world” that is necessary in global times. two biases in particular need naming. one arises from the fact that qualitative research is posed as a binary to quantitative research. in the traditions of strict science, quantitative research operates out of the eighteenth century european enlightenment belief in universal reason. once things are proven scientifically to be true, they are true for all time, and thence form the basis of the “new” scientific culture. this is still the dream that underwrites techno-industrial culture, and is the foundation of science as the legitimizing basis of western imperialism as a form of universal truth. “make the whole world look like america” said george w. bush. of course this is nonsense, but all the more frightening because it is backed up by the military and technical apparatuses that science can produce. so, if not universal reason, then what? well, the binary is qualitative research, or as van manen (1984) once called it, “a theory of the unique.” questions about the generalizability, reliability, and validity of qualitative research still permeate the literature, and doctoral examinations of theses approaching research qualitatively. but qualitative research is precisely not interested in generalizability per se; its primary interest is individual. all of the answers given in response to the question of how then qualitative research might be relevant to a broader world have had difficulty in articulating just what it is that gives qualitative research its power, and i think this has something to do with the way any theory of the unique privileges difference over commonality. the best qualitative research might be more like outstanding literature: on reading it, you feel joined to the broader world in new and refreshing ways. unfortunately, much qualitative research does not achieve this bridging, mainly because, i believe, it has sought its impetus not from the broader world in which it is invested but from an understanding of human subjectivity divorced from politics, philosophy, history, etc. this is ironic, given that qualitative research has its origins precisely in husserl’s call to return to the world -(ger. zu den sachen selbst). it is this recovery of a broader sense of the world that is what qualitative research needs in order to enhance its relevance. i have read many qualitative dissertations over the years, but even the best ones leave me wanting a more urgent connection to the great issues of our time. more on this later. the second ethnocentric bias of qualitative research as a theory of the unique, or of difference, has been touched on above, and resides in the roots not just of european romanticism but within the euro-american tradition generally. this bias has been named by latin american philosopher enrique dussel (1995, 1996) as the problem of subjectivity, and it inhabits the euro-american imagination at the deepest levels. there is not space here to elaborate dussel’s historical tracings of the trajectory of european subjectivity. suffice it to note that so many of the paradigmatic philosophical positions operating in the world today are grounded in an acceptance of the self as the free and definitive arbiter of experience. this is true whether one refers to descartes’ “i think therefore i am,” adam smith’s logic of “self-interest,” or darwin’s evolutionism as a justification for “private” enterprise and individual self-development. dussel’s point is that, in anglo-american public rhetoric, “freedom” is the primary buzzword, but in actuality, it is smith journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 5 4 subjectivity that is the motive force. this is what accounts for the contemporary inversion of values whereby in the name of freedom, over 500,000 iraqi children can be murdered by the enactments of british and american foreign policy (mcmurtry, 2002). if freedom as an ideal is conflated with my subjective determinations of what is necessary for my survival, then the sacrifice of others has its own legitimacy. hence, dussel argues that killing and various forms of genocide are precisely the organic obverse of a subjectivist, self-enclosed logic of freedom. this helps to explain how, for example, the bush administration, like others before it, can commit gross atrocities throughout the world without any sense of guilt or remorse. this entire discussion now brings me back to my opening remarks about special education. if qualitative research is to “transform” the practice of education, two things have to happen. the first is to continue to affirm the originating gesture of the human science tradition, which is the turn to experience. this certainly was a major breakthrough in terms of providing the means for exploring and articulating what it is like to live in the world in one’s given situation, whether a school, a hospital, or a home. much has been learned over the last fifty years or so about the dayto-day realities of human life from this contribution. the second requirement is to broaden the hermeneutic/interpretive vision of qualitative research to better elucidate the political, philosophical, and cultural grounds out of which the subjectivity of experience is formed. without this last gesture, subjective experience remains both selfenclosed and then left dangling helplessly in the winds of broader worldly events. american zen (ch’an) writer, charlotte joko beck (1989, p. 28), has said “unless you are aware, you produce illness.” without recourse to forms of worldly understanding that might heal the wounds of which it speaks, qualitative research runs the risk of remaining stuck in its (european) romantic origins. in a way, the designation of “special” as a form of “species” is linked to this challenge. qualitative research in special education cannot rest simply with a detailing of how, for example a deaf person experiences deafness or how a teacher of handicapped children experiences her work. such studies must continue, but they must also be linked to deeper appreciations, which i will now try to discuss under the topic of “global times.” “globalization” was a significant topic after the fall of the berlin wall and the destruction of the soviet union in the late 1980s. the end of the cold war inspired a frenzied lather of excitement amongst the corporate, political, and military elites of the anglo-american alliance. they saw their chance at capturing the entire globe within the web of their particular theory of economic determinism, the last residual theory of the european enlightenment’s dream of universal reason. hence, 9/11, as a semiotic event, was produced by the us government itself as a pretext for invasion of iraq, afghanistan, and now perhaps iran and syria (ahmed, 2002; chossudovsky, 2003). the fact that the war went badly is a sign of the futility of its original conception, and i believe the world is currently witnessing the death-throes of the last great empire of western “civilization.” we all need now to be asking about the necessary conditions for shared global futures. my point is that the necessary conditions must include a re-thinking of the basic epistemologies that inspired and nurtured western culture to its imperial heights but now are revealing their fundamental inadequacies. i have already referred to aristotle’s theory of substance and principle of non-contradiction which privilege separation and difference. also easily traced are smith journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 5 5 the various philosophies of liberalism that underwrite the concept of the free autonomous person. another source resides in the judeo-christian tradition itself and its concept of divine chosenness. that story begins with god choosing abraham and his seed forever to be a “light to the nations” (isaiah 51:3-5) implying the rest of the world is in darkness. a later christian formulation says that “many are called but few are chosen” (matthew 22: 13-15), and historically this text has inspired anxiety and neurosis from people’s fear of not being among the chosen. the theology of divine chosen-ness is especially pernicious when it is assumed that physical disabilities may be a sign of not being among the chosen. according to that theory alone, either disabled people, blind people, the deaf, and mentally handicapped all received their shape, character, and situation because they lie outside the plan of divine choice (how could a perfect god make imperfect beings?) or they must wait in hope to one day join the community of the well, but always outside looking in. this same problem resides in western theories of national and cultural development. your lack of development is a sign of your exclusion from the club, the club of the chosen. if you want to be selected to join the club you must first take on its ways and manners of being. as madeleine albright, secretary of state during the clinton administration said to the harvard graduating class of 1997: “today i say that no nation in the world need be left out of the global system we are constructing…. every nation that seeks to participate and is willing to do all it can to help itself will have america’s help in finding the right path” (cited in spring, 1998, p. 8, italics added). the original biblical words “many are called but few are chosen” were directed at a poverty-stricken person who received an open invitation to a wedding feast but then was refused admittance because of not wearing the right clothes. again, the point of all the political references above is to underscore how it is that the way we address special education needs to be put in the context of how we understand the broader world in which students, parents, and teachers conduct their lives. so, if special education paradigms are constructed mainly through the interpretive frames and languages of the dominant western tradition, then, when that tradition itself reveals its own pathologies, as it is now doing on a global scale, special education, like all academic areas in the same tradition, inevitably is inhabited by problems it cannot solve from within itself. it needs an other, which can be defined as that which lies “outside” of the limits of what may be known or understood at any particular time. of course, in terms of the principle that i am promoting here, namely that there is only one world and each of us is connected, or interconnected within it, means that the other is never actually “outside” anywhere, because there is no “other” place to reside outside of the fullness of life as it fully exists. by extension, what is required of us to heal ourselves is actually fully available to us at all times because it is always present in the world somehow. the fundamental problem pertains to matters of perception, openness, and appreciation, or, in the language of wisdom traditions, of how to overcome one’s ignorance rooted in illusion or delusion. a common strain of ignorance may interpret disabled people as products of divine choice, which can further intensify their victimhood within normative culture. in asian traditions, the philosophy of karma can operate in a similar way. “karma” names the relationship of cause and effect, especially in the moral realm. if bad things happen to you, it is because you did something bad, not necessarily five minutes ago, but perhaps many years ago. smith journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 5 6 indeed, karmic influences can go on for generations. at the university of alberta, i have developed a graduate seminar called “teaching as the practice of wisdom” in which we study day-to-day encounters through the prisms of the world’s great wisdom traditions, such as taoism, buddhism, confucianism, sufism, and aboriginal spirituality. one day, a student arrived in class, and when i asked, “how are you today?” she broke out in tears. “my husband just left me after eighteen years of marriage,” she said. a chinese student in the class who had been studying falun gung philosophy, based on taoism, immediately said, “that means you must have done something bad a long time ago!” not very comforting words for someone feeling deeply betrayed and abandoned. the asian law of karma has its equivalents in the judeo-christian tradition through various theologies of divine retribution. god takes vengeance on people when they are unfaithful to their covenant, and this is taken as a reason for illness and catastrophic political events. the consequences of “sin” (which literally means “missing the target”) can be felt into the third and fourth generations (exodus 20:5). this view is beautifully repudiated in the mythical story of job, the world’s most godly, faithful man. in spite of his deep faith, he suffered misfortune and illness. he protests to god, claiming his own goodness: “have i denied anything to the poor…? have i eaten my food alone, not sharing it with the fatherless?” (job 31:16). in reply, god refuses such self-justifications, pointing to job’s ignorance: “have you ever commanded the morning, or shown the dawn its place?” (38:12). in the end, job is contrite, accepting the life he has been given, in all its mystery: “i spoke of things i did not understand, too wonderful for me to know” (42:3). the point of this ancient story is that human suffering cannot be reduced to a simple question of “why?” far more important is to affirm the goodness of life in spite of all human persuasions to the contrary. yes, there are profound connections between our actions and their long-term consequences, and it is important to be mindful of this at all times. but to say that we are always ultimately responsible for what happens to us is to place too much faith in the human capacity to correctly interpret human events. many things that happen in life simply cannot be explained by human interpretation; to argue that they can is a sign of what the great buddhist scholar and teacher, d.t. suzuki (in thompson, 1987), called “the homocentric fallacy” – the idea that the whole cosmos has its centre and reason for existence in humanity alone. so, if western reason through its enlightenment traditions of science, including the qualitative human sciences, is incapable of explaining or even “understanding” the full meaning of human suffering, as embodied by those who come to be known as special education students, for example, and the asian law of karma can unfairly interpret misfortune in a way that actually increases people’s suffering: how shall we approach those sometimes named in english as “invalids?” that word alone points in an important direction that is related to the quantitative/qualitative debate. “validity” in statistical research design is a measure of the degree to which an instrument actually measures what it is supposed to be measuring. so, does a particular test in math actually measure a student’s math ability, or really only his/her test-taking ability? in the context of our discussion here, whether a person is “valid” depends on the construct of what a person is ideally supposed to be. otherwise they are in-valid; they are invalids (see jardine, 2000). but such a claim itself is only valid if the original ideal construct itself is justifiable in some way, again relying on a judgement that is necessarily conditioned by time, place, and culture. smith journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 5 7 in the context of what i am proposing here, the world cannot be divided between persons who are valid and those who are invalid. either we are all valid, or all invalid, and indeed i would argue that we are all invalids. every one of us fails in some way to live up to any ideal, whether religious or secular, that human beings have been able to construct for themselves. but it is precisely our shared invalidity, our shared experience of falling short, indeed, our shared suffering, that can be the source of a new common bond between persons. this suffering cannot be interpreted precisely, because as the story of job suggests, it is not for us to know. our work is to accept life itself as a gift and to appreciate it as such, no matter how difficult it seems to be on the surface. when i am in difficulty, what is most helpful from friends and others is not, s o much, advice, interpretation, hard solutions. what is most helpful is simple friendship, arising out of openness, generosity, and for-itself goodness. of course, expertise is often necessary, but not the necessary pre-condition, which is compassion, meaning, “suffering with” (> latin, com “with”, pati pass“suffer”). the great indian social activist, mahatma gandhi (1967, p. 112), once said, “intelligence without compassion is diabolical.” kindly allow me to relate a short personal story. my first job as a new graduate with a ba degree in social science and english literature was as a child care worker with emotionally disturbed children in a residential treatment centre. most of the children suffered greatly from the consequences of physical or mental abuse, autism, schizophrenia, and other dis-orders. for me, the most startling revelation was that those workers most effective with the children were not the most educated or sophisticated, but those who simply extended the hand of human friendship to the children, accepting them as brothers and sisters of the same human family. i do not wish to reduce this complex matter to mere sentiment, but i do wish to note that those workers who, with their advanced degrees in behavioral psychology or other forms of therapeutic protocol, tried to “bring the children around” to some preconceived normative ideal – these well-meaning people were less “effective.” it is almost as if the children could intuit an inherent coercion in the practices of behaviour modification (for example), and they resented it, often starting to play different sorts of power games with their assigned staff members. no, we are all invalids; that is why we need each other. without you, as a living, breathing presence with whom to share a world, i am only half a person. as persons, we need first to feel accepted and welcome in this world before we need to be “interpreted.” indeed, as a contemporary sage, wendell berry (1999, p. 4) has put it, “a preoccupation with interpretation and meaning often gets in the way of simple appreciation.” i think this holds true also in the broader realms of culture and international relations. for example, we must not allow a single, culture-bound interpretation of economic development to rule the whole world, an issue with which i will end my remarks. there are two ways of understanding the identification of “global times” referred to in the title of this paper. most personally favoured is a view that, for the first time in the human story, people from around the world are “facing” each other in unprecedented and creative ways. new possibilities now exist whereby we might better alleviate our invalidity, our collective suffering, through accessing the deep wisdom traditions from around the world, providing visions of what is required at the deepest ethical levels for our mutual survival. this is a vision of “intercivilizational dialogue” over shared human futures (first so named by pasha & samatar, 1996). smith journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 5 8 unfortunately, “global times” are being determined most fully by its second identification, which is not intercivilizational dialogue, but the “clash of civilizations” (huntington, 1998). the world seems saturated with war and conflict, and this is largely the result of legitimate (in my view) resistances to the over-determination of economic liberalism, or neo-liberalism, as a universal recipe for human development. there is not space here to elaborate on this matter, but for a good elucidation of neo-liberalism, see bourdieu 1998. what is most important is its effects on increasing numbers of people, both in the west and around the world. as philosopher david loy (1998, p. 17) has said, “today, the logic of the market is the world’s first universal religion,” and the consequences of this are, and will increasing be, devastating. this is because reigning free market theory is nothing but an abstract mathematical formulation that provides justification for environmental exploitation, hoarding of personal resources, cutting of public finances for social programs and the heralding of “excellence” culture. excellence culture is another name for social darwinism: only the best deserve to survive, and such survival necessarily involves a struggle and war. for those of us in education, and perhaps especially special education, social darwinism does not look kindly on the weak, the vulnerable, and the infirm. if only the fittest survive, then under the reigning interpretive paradigm, only the most beautiful, the most intelligent, the most wealthy, and the most powerful have a chance. the polarization of the rich and poor of the world is increasing at a rapid rate, with the wealthy now barricading themselves behind ever more sophisticated systems of security against “everyone else.” as educators, what do we have to say about this? surely “nothing” is an inadequate response, revealing our entrapment within interpretive paradigms that have lost sight of the worldly context of our work. somehow, i think it means we must denounce at every opportunity, like the resistant children in the residential treatment centre, the dominant social hermeneutic of our time. instead, let us affirm the fundamental solidarity and commonness of the human condition, sharing our ‘invalidity’ as our most important asset. references ahmed, n., & leonard, j. (2002). the war on freedom: how and why america was attacked on sept. 11, 2001. brighton, uk: progressive press. beck, c., & smith, s. (1989). everyday zen: love and work. san francisco, ca: harper. berry, w. (1999). thy life’s a miracle. wild duck review, 5(2), 3-4. bourdieu, p. (1998). the essence of neoliberalism: utopia of endless exploitation. le monde diplomatique. available at http://mondediplo.com/1998/12/08bourdieu. chossudovsky, m. (2000). war and globalization. toronto, on, canada: james lorimer. dussel, e. (1995). the invention of the americas: eclipse of ‘the other’ and the myth of modernity (m. barber, trans.) new york, ny: continuum press. http://mondediplo.com/1998/12/08bourdieu smith journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 5 9 dussel, e. (1996). the underside of modernity: apel, rorty, taylor and the philosophy of liberation (e. mendietta, ed. & trans.). atlantic highlands, nj: humanities press. gandhi, m. (1967). the gospel of swadeshi (a. hingorani, ed.). bombay, india: bharatiya vidya bhavan. huntington, s. (1998). the clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. new york, ny: touchstone books. jardine, d. (2000). learning to love the invalid. in d. jardine (2000). "under the tough old stars": ecopedagogical essays (pp. 193-200). brandon, vt: psychology press/holistic education press. loy, d. (1998). the religion of the market. in h. coward & d. maguire (eds.), visions of a new earth: religious perspectives on population, consumption and ecology (pp. 15-28). albany, ny: state university of new york press. mcmurtry, j. (2002). value wars: the global market as an ethical system. toronto, on, canada: garamond press. pasha, m., & samatar a. (1996). the resurgence of islam. in j. mittleman (ed.), globalization: critical reflections (pp. 187-201). london, uk: lynne reiner. spring, j. (1998). education and the rise of the global economy. mahwah, nj: lawrence erlbaum associates. thompson, w. (1987). the cultural implications of the new biology. in w. thompson, (ed.), gaia: a way of knowing. great barrington, uk: lindisfarne press. van manen, m. (1984). action research as a theory of the unique. occasional paper #32. department of secondary education, university of alberta, edmonton, ab, canada. journal of applied hermeneutics june 21, 2018 the author(s) 2018 corresponding author: katie webber master’s student, faculty of nursing university of calgary email: katherine.webber@ucalgary.ca offering a concert for two: an interpretation of friendship in pediatric oncology palliative care nursing katie m. webber abstract in this paper, written for a hermeneutic research course for my master’s graduate work, i discuss how pediatric oncology nursing is an interpretive practice. i explore the subject of the relational complexity of pediatric oncology nursing, conceptualized as friendship. i then discuss the similarities between understandings of hermeneutics and friendship. in the second part of the paper, i provide a narrative and interpretive account of a personal experience of friendship with a palliative patient and his mother, to offer understanding about the complexities of the work of pediatric oncology palliative care nursing. keywords interpretation, hermeneutics, pediatric oncology nursing, friendship on an inpatient unit, where patients and their families often spend more time than at the address listed in their chart, it is not uncommon that nurses and the parents of pediatric oncology patients develop relationships. pediatric oncology nurses bear witness to parents experiencing the diagnosis, treatment, and sometimes palliation of their child. over time, the relationships between nurses and parents develop and become increasingly complex. an interpretation of this relational complexity is friendship. however, due to a focus in nursing on the creation and maintenance of professional boundaries, it is challenging to understand how friendship could be experienced in a professional mailto:katherine.webber@ucalgary.ca webber journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 9 2 hospital setting, such as pediatric oncology, as it is rare for friend and nurse to be held together as equal partners. when i consider, from a hermeneutic perspective, how i might understand the moments of meaningful connection that have contributed to a sense of purpose in my work as a pediatric oncology nurse, an interpretation that seems to aptly describe these experiences is friendship. exploring the complexities of pediatric oncology palliative care nursing in my own experience, the rigidity of personal and professional boundaries, which divides nurses, patients, and their families, becomes more interpretable and more flexible when providing palliative care. palliative care nursing offers a relational permission that does not always exist when the focus is curative. as the focus shifts towards palliative care, there is a necessary reimagining and reinterpretation of the role of bedside nurse. this shift, from personal experience, can be uncomfortable and requires, as moules, mccaffrey, field, and laing (2015) suggested of heidegger’s understanding of dasein, “a thereness of being” (p. 23), which encourages an absorption into the experience itself, in this case, the experience of caring for a dying child and their family. in many ways, when caring for a palliative patient, one’s perspective of time shifts. no longer are vital signs, assessments, and chemotherapy administration the focus. instead, an ability to be visibly invisible becomes the priority. in other words, as a pediatric oncology nurse caring for a palliative patient, the focus is to be available and present to the experience, while still offering the space and room needed for the patient and parents to have time alone together. pediatric oncology nurses become interpreters of how to best support the needs of the patient and family members. there is no manual, guide, or certification that pediatric oncology nurses can follow in doing the work of palliative care. gadamer (1960/1994) referred to phronesis as a “practical knowledge…[which] must grasp the ‘circumstances’ in their infinite variety” (p. 21). applied to pediatric oncology, an understanding of phronesis, as the practical wisdom needed to interpret and understand both the universality and infinite variability of the dying process, is helpful in describing the interpretability of the practice of pediatric oncology palliative care nursing. a few years ago, i remember hearing a mother recount the experience of her son’s death. she recalled sitting on the parent bed, taking a few minutes to herself in what had been an exhausting week of being at the bedside of her dying son. she shared that her nurse came into the room and softly suggested that she crawl into bed beside her son. within the hour, her son had passed away. she was so thankful for that nurse’s wisdom in that moment. i, too, am so thankful for my colleague, whose practice was profoundly phronetic. as i endeavor to express how nursing in pediatric oncology is interpretive, i will offer some beginning understandings of the connection between hermeneutics and friendship. to illustrate this connection, i have included a personal experience and interpretation of friendship, as a bedside pediatric oncology nurse, with a palliative patient and his mother. as gadamer (1960/1994) offered, “understanding begins…when something addresses us” (p. 299). admittedly, when wrestling with the topic for this paper, i was overwhelmed with emotion. i did not want to confront the topic of the relational complexity of pediatric oncology in the context of palliative care nursing. however, it was undeniable that the topic was addressing me and, having avoided it my entire first webber journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 9 3 semester as a graduate student, it became clear that the time had come to enter into the topic of friendship in pediatric oncology nursing, from a hermeneutic perspective. hermeneutics and friendship much like hermeneutics, which defies a clear, methodical definition (moules et al., 2015), friendship finds itself in a similar situation. as moules et al. offered, hermeneutic interpretive work is best understood through practice, rather than by the careful examination and execution of a specific method. understanding or interpreting friendship seems to be much the same. it is not a step-by-step guide that one follows in friendship, but a human connection that transcends the traditional nurse-patient relationship, which seems to happen “over and above our wanting and doing” (gadamer, 1960/1994, p. xxviii). as a pediatric oncology nurse, my experiences of friendship, with patients and their parents, are not the results of an ability to skillfully complete a central line dressing change or to effectively teach a parent about fever and infection. of course, the technical skills of nursing contribute to building trust and understanding, but my experiences of friendship seem to have happened, over and above what was done or what ought to have been done (gadamer, 1960/1994). as moules et al. (2015) offered “the art of interpretation, that is often only learned through experience and is difficult to teach, involves the process of moving past the initial descriptive themes into the depth and richness of interpretation” (p. 119). in the same way, the art of friendship between nurses, patients, and their families, in the work of pediatric oncology nursing, is also difficult to teach. it requires a moving past the tasks and skills, policies and procedures, and rules and regulations of the work of nursing to experience the depth and richness of friendship. of course, not every patient or family member becomes a friend, but it seems remiss to not acknowledge that patients and family members may become friends somewhere along the cancer trajectory, particularly, in my own experiences, when the treatment shifts in focus towards palliative care. sir francis bacon (1612) offered a poignant and practical attribute of friendship as it relates to understanding. “for friendship maketh indeed a fair day in the affections, from storm and tempests; but it maketh daylight in the understanding, out of darkness, and confusion of thoughts” (para. 6). i cannot help but draw a connection to the complex relational work of pediatric oncology palliative care nursing. perhaps one of the darkest storms, a tempest in life, is the experience of being present during the death of a child. how could any daylight be experienced in this storm? how could the confusion of the experience be made clearer, even just for a moment? perhaps, in the confusing experience of the death of a child, an experience of friendship between a nurse and a parent offers an opportunity for a new perspective, similar to the work of hermeneutics (moules et al., 2015). these friendships that develop, between nurses and parents who have experienced the loss of a child, is perhaps why many parents, even after the passing of their child, return to the unit to visit the nurses; to tangibly experience aletheia, a working “against what was dead bringing it to life” (moules et al., 2015, p. 3). as a pediatric oncology nurse, it has been my experience that friendship, true human connection, offers an opportunity for understanding to begin. the memories that i draw on from my nursing practice about friendship are the moments where authentic human connections, which defy the traditional nurse-patient boundary, have taken place. in the moments where i, as a nurse, no longer webber journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 9 4 hold a position of power, but a position equal to or perhaps even lesser than that of the patient or their parent. i must be clear, though, that it is not always a comfortable or easy place to sit. as a nurse, i have been employed to know, to advise, to educate. i am there to meet the needs of the other, the patient and their family, not the for the other to meet my needs. however, when given the space to consider the meaningful moments in my career as a nurse, the moments that have grasped a hold of me, they are often the quieter moments of sitting with, listening to, and sometimes even sharing something personal about myself. these moments give way to an opportunity that transcends the traditional nurse-patient boundary, and enters into one that allows for a greater, more human understanding and appreciation of one another. my last day with ryan i remember walking into the report room. i was going away for the weekend, and so i had elected to take the last four hours of that friday’s shift as vacation. i knew that there was a palliative patient on the unit, but, in general, palliative patients are assigned to nurses who are working full twelve-hour shifts and several shifts in a row, in order provide consistency for families. somehow, though, i had known driving to work that i would be assigned to him. i felt anxious as i listened to the report from the night shift nurse. my heart was beating, and i was frustrated. i had hoped to have a weekend away that did not involve any baggage from work. i had hoped for a stress-free, eight-hour shift. i had hoped not to care for a dying child that friday. i was wrong, though. caring for ryan that day was exactly what i needed. ryan and his mother, unknowingly, taught me something about friendship that continues to influence my nursing practice today. the nurse, who walked into his room at 8 a.m., heart-pounding, worried that his mother might ask something hard that she would not know the answer to, was a different nurse, who walked out 3:30 p.m. throughout the morning, doctors, nurses, and family members filtered in and out of the room. there was a certain thickness in the air that only rooms with dying people seem to have in them. however, when michael, the mandolin-strumming spiritual care worker, came in, whistling a happy tune, he breathed a freshness into the room with his music. ryan was unconscious, heavily sedated by the intravenous analgesics being given to him, but his mother smiled so graciously as the music played. after the mandolin-playing finished, she thanked michael because she knew ryan, as a violin player himself, had been listening and appreciating the music. almost before i realized what i was potentially offering to do, the words came tumbling out of my mouth “i play the violin, too.” in wanting to find a connection with his mother, perhaps even to attempt to expose myself, if only in a small way, as i watched her be so exposed by the experience of watching her son die, i had disclosed something that, at the time, i held quite quietly to myself. she looked at me, with soft, pleading eyes, and asked if i would play my violin for him. i paused. it was my general practice to avoid any public appearances with my violin, but i could not help but promise that, when i returned to work on monday night, i would bring my violin. while the hours of my shift progressed, i continued to mull on this willingness in me to play the violin for ryan and his mother. something had shifted between ryan, his mother, and me. by extending a piece of myself that i generally kept quite private, the distance between myself as a nurse and ryan’s mother had closed ever so slightly, moving towards a fine balance of friendship in pediatric oncology palliative care nursing. i moved in and out of the room for the next hours, webber journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 9 5 propping ryan up when he slipped down, listening to ryan’s mother’s fears about what it would be like to watch him die, and trying my best to be present to their needs. as the hours went by, i felt myself relax into the role of palliative care nurse. in the last hour of my shift, ryan’s mother asked if i would sit with him while she went for a long walk. she told me that it was her birthday, and she said that she wanted to mark the day, even in the midst of sorrow, by walking to the pond near the hospital. i wanted to be brave for her. i wanted to acknowledge the trust and friendship she was extending to me to sit with her son on one of his last days. however, i must admit that i was terrified that ryan would take his last breath with only me by his side. as she left, i sat down beside him and held his hand. i do not remember what i said to him, but i remember softly chatting, humming a little bit, and then long moments of quiet. an hour or so later, she returned from her walk. her face held a settled despair that only the mothers of dying children must know all too well. as my shift ended, i said my goodbyes to her and ryan, and i thanked her for the time i had spent with them that day. i was grateful, calm, and deeply moved by the opportunity she had given me to hold the hand of her boy on one of his last days. of course, that would be the last time i ever saw ryan and his mother. as is the practice of our unit to notify nurses of patient deaths, my phone rang the following day. i did not answer but waited for the message to be left to let me know that ryan had passed away. i was somewhat at a loss of how to respond to the news, which was surprising because i knew that ryan was going to die. i do not write in a journal very often, in fact, it is the only time that i have written about a patient, but, the experience of friendship and human connection that transcended the traditional nurse-patient boundary, compelled me to respond in writing to what i was feeling. i wanted to capture the moments of that day. the following is what i wrote, which i share as my own interpretation of the experience of caring for ryan that day. it is exposing, asks me to be even more vulnerable than i already feel. barriers are my judgments of others reflected back onto myself. i am emotionally exhausted by yesterday. all i have, all that fills my mind are his breaths, the progression from sixty, to forty, to thirty-eight…to none, as if i could count down his last minutes. the invitation, i am sure, is to let myself feel this, but, the temptation is to try to forget it. or, perhaps, the temptation is to hold on too tightly? quite honestly, i do not know. i am afraid to be too affected and i am afraid of forgetting. i am afraid of whatever is left in the middle. the mandolin strums, my foot taps, his eyes are closed. the tube that draws air to his lungs has also taken it away. who am i in this? i am a healer, but today, a pallbearer. today, is a sad day. i will not need my violin on monday night, will i ever need it in that way again? as i write, i notice how i feel. i feel that i do not deserve the grief. but, admittedly, i do. a smile rolls onto my face as i see how alive he was in his death. “kids have a way of choosing their time,” she [the doctor] said. she was right. not yesterday, but today. so, cheers to you, beautiful, intelligent, young, and experienced ryan. may you rest in peace. unpacking and concluding my relationship with my violin has always been complex. i am usually quite shy about playing it for others. as a child, i was embarrassed because it made me different than many of my peers. i remember standing up alone at the front of many stages, feeling so vulnerable, hoping that the webber journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 9 6 shaking of my hands was being communicated to the audience as vibrato, and desperately hoping that i would remember the pages of sheet music i had memorized. when i finally quit taking lessons late into my teenage years, i questioned whether i would ever want to play my violin again. this relationship, over time, began to heal, and as an adult i have realized that being able to violin is not such a terrible thing. although i have become more willing to share this part of myself, largely thanks to ryan and his mother, i am still, and was certainly at the time, very closed about playing the violin. so why would i disclose this part of myself, let alone share something personal in a professional setting? as gadamer (1960/1994) suggested, my offer of connection and extension of friendship, was “over and above my wanting and doing” (p. xxviii). ryan’s mother was going through an experience that i could only begin to imagine. although her request was to play for ryan, i was not really going to be playing for ryan, i was going to be playing for her. what i saw in front of me was a mother, so vulnerable, simply wanting to hear the sound of a violin, to remind her of her son. in my own desire for connection with her and to honour her vulnerability, i wanted to play for her. unfortunately, i never had the opportunity. i can only imagine how nervous i would have been and how uncomfortable it would have made me to have my coworkers overhear me playing in his room. however, to this day i wish more than anything that i had had the chance to play my violin at a concert for two. in a pediatric oncology setting, the friendships that develop, between nurses, patients, and family members, can erode barriers that sometimes prevent nurses from truly understanding their patients. from a perspective that nurses and parents of palliative patients do experience friendship, as an equalizing human connection, the anxiety of being the most technically skilled nurse starts to dispel and can soften into a more phronetic experience of nursing. gadamer (1996) wrote that there is an “unmistakable evidence of a connection between the conscious and self-conscious awareness of our own life and the very ungraspability of death” (p. 63). my experiences of friendship, with parents of palliative patients, due to the nature of working so close to death, have affected my conscious and unconscious ways of being a nurse. to close, through the process of articulating my own understandings and interpretations of friendship as a nurse in pediatric oncology, i can see the similarity of the challenge that hermeneutics and friendship both face: “hermeneutic questions are hard questions; hermeneutic understanding is hard understanding” (moules et al., 2015, p. 202). however, i have also begun to see how, going forward, my continued desire to pursue an understanding of the topic of friendship in pediatric oncology nursing, responds to what moules et al. concluded with about hermeneutics, “at the heart of it is the capacity to know and live differently – to find language that works” (p. 202). it is my sincere hope to continue to find language that works to articulate how we might understand the complex, meaningful experiences of friendship in pediatric oncology settings. references bacon, f. (1612). of friendship. retrieved from http://www.authorama.com/essays-of-francisbacon-27.html http://www.authorama.com/essays-of-francis-bacon-27.html http://www.authorama.com/essays-of-francis-bacon-27.html webber journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 9 7 gadamer, h-g. (1996). the enigma of health. (j. gaiger & n. walker, trans.). stanford, ca: stanford university press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1994). truth and method. (2nd rev. ed.; j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. journal of applied hermeneutics june 21, 2018 the author(s) 2018 corresponding author: graham mccaffrey, rn phd faculty of nursing, university of calgary email: gpmccaff@ucalgary.ca editorial: chi 2018 – the politics of displacement graham mccaffrey today, in light of increasingly coercive conformism, it is more urgent than ever to heighten heretical consciousness. (byung-chul han, 2017, p. 83) the history of the canadian hermeneutic institute (chi) is entwined with that of the journal of applied hermeneutics (jah). the chi was inaugurated in 2009 and has just successfully completed its tenth annual meeting. the jah began life in 2011 – the journal came out of a suggestion by dr. richard kearney, the visiting scholar at the third canadian hermeneutic institute in 2011. the first two articles in the journal were an editorial by moules, mccaffrey, morck, and jardine (2011) setting out their vision for the journal, and a landmark paper by kearney (2011) where he discussed his ideas about diacritical hermeneutics. this is a paragraph from that opening editorial summarizing chi’s history to that point (more information and subsequent history can be found at the chi website, http://www.chiannual.com): drs. nancy johnston, deborah mcleod, and nancy moules established the canadian hermeneutic institute in 2009, with its inaugural 3-day meeting in halifax, nova scotia, canada. the intent of the institute was to bring together scholars of hermeneutics and hermeneutic research across disciplines in creative dialogue and conversations of philosophy, research, and practice. the first visiting scholar was dr. david jardine, http://www.chiannual.com/ mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 2 2 professor in the faculty of education at the university of calgary. in 2010, the institute was hosted in toronto with visiting scholar, dr. john d. caputo, professor of religion emeritus at syracuse university and the david r. cook professor of philosophy emeritus at villanova university. in 2011, dr. richard m. kearney, charles h. seelig chair of philosophy at boston college and visiting professor at university college dublin, was the visiting scholar for the institute held in calgary, alberta. dr. kearney initiated the idea for a journal that could showcase the work he heard from institute participants of bridging philosophy and practice. (moules et al, 2011, p. 3) of the three founders, drs. mcleod and johnston have retired from their academic positions and dr. nancy moules has continued as the prime organizer and inspiration for the work of the chi. the journal and institute continue to share a common goal of providing space for the work of applied hermeneutics, a ground for the meeting of hermeneutic philosophy and practice disciplines, such as nursing, education, and counselling psychology. after the conclusion of the tenth institute, it is a fitting moment, in this journal, to reflect on the chi and, through its most recent meeting while still fresh in the mind, on the extraordinary kind of event that it is. another reason for revisiting the chi in this moment is the recent release of dr. john caputo’s new book, hermeneutics: facts and interpretation in the age of information (2018). dr. caputo is a leading hermeneutic philosopher who has been exploring and expanding the possibilities of hermeneutics in print since his book radical hermeneutics in 1987. he was the invited scholar at the 2nd chi in toronto in 2010. his new book is a kind of taking stock, reviewing the hermeneutic tradition (with his distinctly deconstructionist emphasis), and positioning it for the contemporary challenge “to address what is becoming of the professions, of our institutions, of our world, in the age of ‘advanced information technologies,’ which have brought about a sea change in everything we do” (2018, p. 20). he included a chapter entitled gadamerian nurses (pp. 217-244) in which he discussed his encounter with the chi and the work of hermeneutic researchers in practice professions. i can attest to the enormous influence it has had on me to attend the chi, to listen to leading hermeneutic scholars, and to engage in conversation with them – it is rather wonderful to find such affirmation that the influence flows in both directions. the 10th annual canadian hermeneutic institute took place in calgary, where the visiting scholar was dr. ted george from texas a&m university. dr. george had met with dr. moules on previous occasions, and was the organizer of the 2016 north american society for philosophical hermeneutics (nasph) conference in texas where dr. moules and myself, with the eminent hermeneutic scholar dr. jean grondin, gave a panel presentation about applied hermeneutics. in part, no doubt, because the conversation was already under way, dr. george was extraordinarily well attuned to the habitus (to borrow a term he used) of the chi of the meeting place between philosophy and practice professions,1 between attentive thinking and discerning action. over three days, dr. george traced the arc of an argument for the ethical weight of gadamer’s hermeneutics, how his thought points to ways of seeing how we are held to situations of obligation that we may or may not face into in their fullness, and which may comprise pockets of resistance 1 i use this distinction for convenience – it is not to say that philosophers do not practice and practitioners do not philosophize – that blending is integral to the unique atmosphere of the institute. mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 2 3 to the instrumentalizing forces of globalization. i will not attempt an exposition of his case, which was fulsome, profound, and elegantly expressed – that is another article, and it is not mine to write. instead, i want to try to capture the mix of deep interest, stimulation, engagement, conversation, urgency, relaxation, intellectual and emotional seriousness, laughter, and – yes – deepening understanding that has been engendered in the brief life of each meeting of the chi, through the lens of this particular meeting. first, it is important to recognize the hard work that the visiting scholars put into preparing and delivering a sustained program of philosophical reflection to nonspecialists for three full mornings in succession. i have already mentioned dr. george’s attunement to the people in the room, and the metaphor extends to his tuning of his ideas in question and answer sessions, and in presenting on successive days in the light of the previous days’ discussions. i have never failed to be impressed by, and grateful for the generosity of the visiting scholars who have spoken at the chi, and their lively curiosity and receptiveness towards the work of those of us bringing hermeneutics to our places of practice. on the first day, dr. george drew attention to gadamer’s concern with alienation, which he went on to read through jean luc nancy’s (2007) account of globalization. according to nancy, globalization, with its spread of uniform technologies, lifestyles, and markets, renders everything in terms of exchange value, and leaches the worth of the non-replicable, the non-exchangeable, the unique experiences that are essential to a meaningful life. one effect of globalization is the obsolescence of physical centres of power, which means that resistance can no longer take the form of revolutionary crowds in the city square. the potential space of resistance is in the “nooks and crannies” of everyday life, in hermeneutic situations of human encounter. “nooks and crannies” of hermeneutic situations in the work of practice professionals working in institutional settings became one of the working motifs for the institute. it came up, for example, as the experience of the ems paramedic noticing the effort required to recognize the call of each patient in their personhood, not only in the measurements required by the institution; in the use of digital stories in healthcare as a mode of human expression that interrupts the flow of data to kindle human connections; in the challenge of creating moments of encounter with nature for schoolchildren without reducing it to mere spectacle. “displacement” was the stand-out word of the second day, as dr. george explored what it is to go forward in terms of gadamer’s account of hermeneutic experience (erfahrung) as factical, circular, and demanding a disposition to openness that is effortful and ethical. displacement, as i hear it, is the jolt of not-knowing that permits new-knowing, and can lead to deepening of understanding. phronesis is the mode of application, how one responds out of displacement, making “good decisions in irresolute situations” (george, personal communication, june 7, 2018). conversations continued, about caring for others at the end of life, as a nurse or as a close relation, about the limit situations that confront us, displace us, challenge us to bring forth good ways of responding with and beyond the rules we already know. on the third day, dr. george talked about embodiment in gadamer, a theme, as he noted, not usually associated with his work. we had been primed the day before by an afternoon presentation from alexander crist, a doctoral student in philosophy at texas a&m university who gave a paper exploring gadamer’s ideas about pain, which gadamer had delivered in his last public lecture at the age of 100, and recently translated by crist. (with my rudimentary german, one of mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 2 4 the pleasures of this institute for me was listening to the back and forth between dr. george and crist on the finer points of translating gadamer’s german terms). there was a poignancy to the picture of the philosopher in old age turning his thoughts to pain and illness, not to complain but to think about them, and to make an argument for the arts of healing, for the restoration of health as part of a fulfilled life. dr. george brought the theme of embodiment, how we view our bodies, illness, and medicine back to nancy’s account of globalization. in the regime of globalization, even bodies have market value as productive entities, so that health is commodified and illness becomes a loss of value. conversely, for gadamer, participation in the restitution of health has value as part of a life meaningfully lived. the hermeneutic insight of displacement reappears as the existential acknowledgement of pain as part of life from the start. a brief narrative of what was said (my interpretation thereof at least) tells you something about what went on at the chi this year, but it scarcely does justice to the conversations that occurred in open sessions, over coffee, at lunch, and overspilling the end of the scheduled day that infused the event with an exciting abundance of ideas. the institute has remained small, for a conference, but is more like a large seminar with plenty of opportunity for questions and discussion with the visiting scholar and presenters. none of this is accidental. it has held true to the original intention to focus on hermeneutics, with a gadamerian slant, and the format has been adjusted over the years to find its current balance. in the discussion following a presentation by galicia blackman about the place of play in a language arts class, the role of the referee came up – dr. jim field drew on his experience as a rugby referee to say that the referee’s role is to know, monitor, and enforce the rules of the game – but also to discern and to allow the flow of play. dr. nancy moules has been instrumental in establishing the chi and in organizing it each time it has been held in calgary – she has set out the field of play, established some rules for the game, and then she is expert at that other role, of allowing the flow of play. all of us who have attended and participated in the chi owe a debt of gratitude to the three co-founders, who wanted a canadian forum for gadamerian philosophy, and so they created one, and to the continuing work of dr. moules. coda: in defence of the agreeable as i consider the agreeableness of the three days of the chi, i start to wonder whether we were missing just that displacement of which we all felt so much in favour. i use the word agreeable advisedly, not only for its sense of coming to an agreement but also the mood of stability and contentment that it evokes. did we sign up to displacement in theory, but not in practice? did we come away with a false sense of moral superiority in our enhanced ability to cope with experience (by which i mean erfahrung, of course)? well, maybe, but displacement does not have to be abrasive. fusion of horizons means that we have found common ground, space in which our prejudices have been put under pressure, where something in our understanding has shifted, and we have made room for it to shift. sometimes this hurts, and sometimes it is more like the sensation of well-made effort, for example in the bike ride i took this afternoon – feeling my legs ache uphill, rolling smoothly on the flat, hazy blue rockies on the horizon, then precisely judging the curves on the fast downhill. a meeting of people who share a commitment to gadamer’s hermeneutics ought to be agreeable, just as the people i have met who knew gadamer always stress how personally agreeable he was, how close he was in personality and conduct to his philosophy of respectful openness towards the mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 2 5 other, seeking deeper understanding through conversation. the chi is a clearing, to borrow heidegger’s famous image, a space in which fusions of horizons are sought and welcomed – not guaranteed, and they take work but made more likely. fusions plural, because as with hermeneutic research, if we went back to piece together what happened at the chi we would inevitably find a plurality of horizons taking in the common meeting place. far from being a problem, we should not take the agreeableness we find at chi for granted. it does not happen by accident, but is the outcome of reflection upon previous experience, careful planning, and expert facilitation. after the chi, philosophers remain philosophers, nurses remain nurses, and teachers remain teachers. we have had an experience that now cannot be undone, and if we have been listening, we have been displaced – with kindness and generosity – by visitors from other places (and of course we are all visitors in each other’s worlds, within and across all professions and disciplines) with other concerns, other ways of seeing, of speaking, and thinking. several people commented in our final discussion about the chi itself that this is not as other academic conferences and events. there is room to breathe. chi is one of the “nooks and crannies” of resistance to globalization. our agreeableness, our finding worth in conversations, is a recuperation and a clarification of what we can do, as thinkers and practitioners with hermeneutics, to keep open spaces of human contact amongst the instrumentalizing demands of the institutions we inhabit. references caputo, j.d. (2018). hermeneutics: facts and interpretation in the age of information. london, uk: pelican. han, b.c. (2017). psychopolitics: neoliberalism and new technologies of power. london, uk: verso. moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., morck, a.c., & jardine, d.w. (2011). on applied hermeneutics and the work of the world. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 1. issn 1927-4416. retrieved from: https://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/5 nancy, j.l. (2007). the creation of the world, or globalization (f. raffoul & d. pettigrew, trans.). albany, ny: state university of new york press. https://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/5 mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 editorial 2 6 corresponding author: david w. jardine, phd retired, university of calgary email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 23, 2018 the author(s) 2018 sunflowers, coyote, and five red hens david w. jardine preamble not everyone is beguiled by the hunt for double meanings, the decoding of references, the connection between sub-rhythmic dots of syllabic emphases, or the tracing of narrative arcs. [but] i do believe that those buried layers of syntactic, semantic and symbolic meaning give life to the songs, regardless of whether the listener gives a hoot about decoding them. they deepen the saturation of the colours, the concentration of feeling and the verisimilitude of the small world the songs describe. (newsom, with paytress, 2015, p. 86) sight-lines i feel uneasy stepping into the great territories opened up by nancy moules (2017) and kate beamer (2017) at the tail end of last year’s journal of applied hermeneutics. it is not (yet) a territory i have endured as deeply. that bracketed “yet” is little more than a feeble attempt at trying to remember not to forget what surrounds us all, whatever its proximity. there is no real refuge out of the sight-lines of impermanence, death, and grief. a shuddering thought, that this makes persistent and practiced mindfulness of these sight-lines the only reliable refuge. it is no accident that contemporary hermeneutics, in its ventures to speak about our living circumstances, is inevitably surrounded by penumbras of finitude and its ins and outs, and how, or whether, or to what extent, i have come to live with this inevitably. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 4 2 this is wound into the flesh of any and all topics of any interpretive delve: “the concept of substance is . . . inadequate. [there is a] radical challenge to thought implicit in this inadequacy” (gadamer, 1989, p. 242). the challenge is simple. what shall we say, what shall we do, in the face of the reality of impermanence? we want to speak clearly and openly but without foreclosure or finality. we want to invite others into this open wound and help them calm themselves and become composed and undistracted if they do. that is what these two authors have done for us. when their teacher, edmund husserl (1970, p. 7), desperately asked “can we console ourselves with that? can we live in this world?” his students’ answer was a resounding yes, yes, this is the locale of our solidarity and hope. the good news, the hermeneutic consolation, is that “everything around us teaches impermanence” (tsong-kha-pa. 2000, p. 151). everything around us teaches us precisely this consolation. everything is an opportunity for practice and commiseration, for comfort in its lovely etymological origin – common strength. thus, the secret of interpretive work is that this impermanent dependent co-arising is full of relations, full of often hidden or occluded voices and ancestries, mixed blood lines, secrets. it is full precisely of the voices and images and ideas and lingerings of the quick and the dead. opening the mouths of the dead in lament of the dead (hillman & shamdasani 2013), james hillman repeatedly introduces a stunning image to help formulate his experience of first opening carl jung's then-recently published red book (1999): “i was reading about this practice that the ancient egyptians had of opening the mouth of the dead. i think we don’t do that with our hands” (p. 1). sonu shamdasani soon elaborates: it is the ancestors. it is the dead. this is no mere metaphor. this is no cipher for the unconscious or something like that. when [jung] talks about the dead he means the dead. and they’re present in images. they still live on. (p. 2) this is an ecological as well as a mytho-poetic presumption, and it has some affinity to threads of buddhist thought as well. it is a presumption that “transforms the world and its beings into a most extraordinary vision” (tsong-kha-pa, 2005, p. 125): the land of the dead is the country of ancestors, and the images who walk in on us are our ancestors. if not literally the blood and genes from whom we descend, then they are the historical progenitors. (hillman, 1996, p. 60) likewise, the linguistic progenitors hidden in words (like “comfort”). and the earthly progenitors hidden in the plain sight of the animal body’s tracing of places and footfalls. the dogs sniffing old piss trails as the snow melts. “transforming according to circumstances, meet all beings as your ancestors” (hongzhi zhengjue [1091-1157 ce], 1991, p. 43; see jardine, 2016, pp. 75-78) jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 4 3 we “are always already everywhere inhabited” (smith 2006, p. xxiv). the ancestors, our relations, human and other-wise, are always already amongst us and we amongst them, in the most ordinary of objects or words or images, in the texts, in the trees, in the dreamstates, in the gestures, even in the flesh-ache of muscle-born dry wood for winter and the panicky bugs that scurry over it. or in the distant, unwarranted and perhaps inevitable fear for one’s child, care sometimes gone amuck, monkey-mind in the midst of impermanence. and this is just as true of ravens nearby and long since disappeared, of trees long gone to soils, of the outbreath of this forest, here, now, around me, inhaled under the sun’s slow returning. sunflowers and five red hens every road leads to an end your apparition passes through me in the willows five red hens – you’ll never see us again. sufjan stevens (2015), from “death with dignity” a delicate helado negro remix of “death with dignity,” these shreds and patches have the poignant, half-there quality of going through the possessions of someone dear who has died. its incompleteness, then, is as apt a reflection of grieving as you could hope for. (harris, 2018, p. 107) pennants. #239, 2nd floor west, trueman house, 1947. the still, colourless memory of a colourful past still embedded with pins. (adapted from moules, 2017, p. 3) five red hens whose saturation of color is palpable in those lines that took my breath away, even though i don’t quite know what it means: we are drawn into an event . . . and arrive, as it were, too late, if we want to know what we are supposed to [now] believe. (gadamer, 1989 p. 490) but i do know how it means. its specificity holds and intensifies and “breaks forth as if from a center” (gadamer, 1989, p. 458). images are sites of power and prickle, pins that beckon attention and ask something of us – to take good care of them. they are incomplete, and an elegant interpretation of them leaves them as they are, deepening the saturation of the colours. i didn’t know john moules well. only a wee bit. only once upon a time sat in his backyard, with seven-foot –were they eight-foot? 10? 20? -sunflowers laced to the garage and singing in the full-bore summer light, all heads, ours too, turned in phototropic obedience, and all this burned into memory traces whose graces come and go. we are all sat still. still there. motionless. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 4 4 and he came to see my garden and it now seems like a near-mythic event, his frail gait and determination under ravens overhead soaring on summer thermals, black oily wings glinting and curving in thin air. all things teach as they alight and gurk-gurk and click and burble and yellow-eye the compost. we check the greenhouse and check the smell of the tomato leaves. that smell like nothing else. furry vines thick with the perfume of red pulses. grieving can be just this acrid sweet: silhouette of the cedar what is that song you sing for the dead? (stevens, 2015, n.p.) i grew up around cedar trees and there aren’t any hereabouts. they haunt me still from little boy days near lake ontario and the niagara escarpment, where they clung to limestone edges and aged in place for centuries. as did i, feeling my age as this image flits by and flirts and teases. red hens, cedars, ravens, sunflowers, all new and fresh. there is some relief to be had in feeling already somewhat outlived. of dropping the heavy weight of feeling necessary to the well-being of the world. “a radical challenge to thought.” it is an escape from something. held captive and coming to insight is more than the knowledge of this or that situation. it always involves an escape from something [latin fugere] that had deceived us and held us captive. thus, insight always involves an element of self-knowledge and constitutes a necessary side of what we called experience in the proper sense. insight is something we come to. it . . . is ultimately part of [our human vocation] –i.e., to be discerning and insightful. (gadamer, 1989, p. 356) [insight is] is not [simply about] this or that particular thing [but] insight into the limitations of humanity. thus, experience is the experience of human finitude. the truly experienced person is one who has taken this to heart. the idea that everything can be reversed, that there is always time for everything and that everything somehow returns, proves to be an illusion. (gadamer 1989, p. 357) we are reifying beings and such reification belies impermanence and such belying of impermanence leaves us haunted but not necessarily insightful. images can spellbind as much as they can release us into the tumult of things. remaining fugitive is the art of interpretation. martin heidegger’s unheimlichkeit, “un-home-like-ness,” (1962, p. 233) sensing the uncanny haunt of things under the icy surface calm, just looked up in an old hardcover bought in 1971, held together with tape, aging in place on the shelf, still with the notes from a conversation with gadamer from 1976 scrawled inside the cover, with his note back to his own teacher: jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 4 5 care [german sorge, root of “sorrow”] is internal to being-in-the-world rather than its dominating father. (see jardine, 2015) it is sometimes true that the dead are more amongst us when they are no longer alive, that they are “with” us in more lively and haunting ways in their death than in their living. back and forth, between memory love, anger, disappointment, reality romance, gratitude, admiration, regret. (adapted from moules, 2017, p. 2) every death bursts forth as if from a center. their living, in death, gets tossed up into thin air and scattered outwards, an energy out beyond the thicknesses of a body, lying, stilled. it is getting these grave gravities back in motion again, back “in play” (gadamer, 1989, pp. 101-109), that is the work of undergoing grief – aristotle’s energia, that very thing that grief can drain faster than it fills up, “aliveness.” “the claim” after this recognition – the image as ancestor – there is the experience of the claim that images make upon me. . . . we do not make them up, so we do not make up our response to them but are ‘taught’ this response by them. . . . our way . . . does not interpret the image but talks with it. it does not ask what the images means but what it wants. . . . how do we know whether they mean well with us or would possess us? (hillman, 1996, pp. 60, 61, 93, 75) “shifted toward a rustling” something outside of the funeral hall window caught my attention and my gaze shifted toward a rustling in the bushes. coyote. it was one of those bone chilling winters, a harsh climate, that provided comfort to me in its barren, hollow form. yet still, there was movement. (beamer, 2017, p. 1) still. there was movement, animation in a barren, hollow form. back and forth. between. “the true locus of hermeneutics is this in-between” (gadamer 1989, p. 295). it is the fugitive spot where we can sense, in the smallest or largest of events, that “something is going on, (im spiele ist), something is happening (sich abspielt)” (gadamer, 1989, p. 104), or as the german etymology betrays, something is at play (german spiel). jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 4 6 but watch out. hiding here, too, is a yiddish-english usage of a tricky tale meant to deceive or persuade or to allow the teller to escape unharmed or elude capture. thus summoning pitchman hermes all over again and coyote’s trickiness. in taking up the trick, walking through the open gate, then, we must remain alert and not just fall for it. the wound of grief is thus a locale of the unexpected, rustling arrival of “something outside”: perception of opportunities requires a sensitivity given through one’s own wounds. here, weakness provides the kind of hermetic, secret perception critical for adaptation to situations. the weak place serves to open us to what is in the air. we feel through our pores which way the wind blows. we turn with the wind; trimmers. an opportunity requires. . .a sense. . .which reveals the daimon of a situation. the daimon of a place in antiquity supposedly revealed what the place was good for, its special quality and dangers. the daimon was thought to be a familiaris of the place. to know a situation, one needs to sense what lurks in it. (hillman, 2013, pp. 101-102) coyote is just such a familiar figure, and it is how hermes might be cast as well, both like the sweep of a black cat on a witch’s broom. familiars. the bush-rustling portend of energia, aliveness. coyote’s trick, hermes’ opening of the gate, can bring hope and a sense of futurity, opportunity out beyond grief and its thickness and gravity and haltedness. opportunity, portals, pores, openings, wounds. a hint, then, of aletheia (see moules, 2016). sensing what lurks. pins and hens and sunflowers turn to face me. what do you want? what shall i do that is proper to this turning? imagine. death’s swerving halt sets things in motion. its arrival is not adequately understood as simply the causal outcome of previous events or circumstances. instead, it happens and its happenstance cascades out into the future and back into previous events deemed finished and over with. in this sense, it makes sense, but does not make enough sense to speak of the “cause of death.” death enlivens – memory, presumption, desire, hope, imagination, expectation, regret, anger, and grief, yes grief. precisely its eventful finality makes it an unfinished swerve, back and forth, and sidelong into surroundings, multiple. summoned “to see with fresh eyes” (gadamer, 1989, p.16) it is full of “lightning flashes” (calvino, 1988, p. 48) the suddenly found object, the suddenly arisen smell or word or little totem having been left behind here on a table, sometimes unbearably and unexplicably full of significance, reminder, or portend. the ghost of a forgotten habit run into over coffee spilled in the morning. “i see dead people” in the quickening light glanced in the window. even those words about fresh eyes are precisely such, remembered here, memorably risen up seemingly of their own volition. italo calvino (1988) speaks of “quickness” in this light. things happen and no amount of wellwrought themes or rules or the like can outrun the fact that “the rule does not comprehend it” jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 4 7 (gadamer, 1989, p. 39) – the event outruns and such outrunning keeps the rule alive and alert and in play. it becomes a live-wire that must prove itself again and again in the face of events. oddly, so oddly, death in the experience of the living as an experience of “lightness” (calvino, 1988) and “quickening” (see jardine, 2015a, p. 109-122). and this just as the very opposite also occurs, where the live body, in death, becomes a thick thing in an instant and how the dead body seems to weigh so much more than one that is alive. “afflicted by openness” opportunities are not plain, clean gifts; they trail dark and chaotic attachments to their unknown backgrounds, luring us further. one insight leads to another; one invention suggests another variation; more and more seems to press through the hole, and more and more we find ourselves drawn out into a chaos of possibilities. (hillman, 2013, p. 94) we can become “afflicted by openness” (hillman, 2013, p. 113) as those grieving know full well. what might have portended quickness and enlivening can shift: “wingedness [can] become mere haste” (p. 51) or the repeated, even relentless rush of moments, swerves, waves of memory and gut that simply push and stab. those doing hermeneutic work understand this full well, too. suddenly, unexpectedly, “everything points to some other thing. nothing comes forward just in the one meaning that is offered to us” (gadamer, 2007, p. 131). we can be “outplayed” (gadamer, 1989, p. 106). or, perhaps worse “through his[/her] own wounds, [“wound” as locale of vulnerability, pain, sensitivity; “wound” as hole or portal, latin porta, root of opportunity] may feed others, but may himself [/herself] be drained thereby” (hillman, 2013, pp. 19-20). in grief, we can end up spent, drained whilst all the while there is the buzzing of event. there are those times when the memory of the dead starts to flit and cascade and buzz and tremble and skitter and scatter and it won’t stop. it won’t stop. this is so much like those first becoming involved in interpretive work. “how do i get it to stop?” “the uninitiated,” the unpracticed, “have no proper vessel. they carry water in a sieve and pour it into a perforated jar” (hillman, 2013, p. 220). “the green signals” how their deaths quicken the air around them, stipple their bodies with a light like the green signals trees send out before their leaves appear. (wallace, 1987, p. 40) what writers have is a license and also the freedom to sit -to sit, clench their fists, and make themselves be excruciatingly aware of the stuff that we’re mostly aware of only on a certain level. and that if the writer does his job right, what he basically does is remind the reader of how smart the reader is. [it] is to wake the reader up to stuff that the reader’s been aware of all the time. (wallace, with lipsky, 2010, p. 41) jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 4 8 this is such a lovely hint at the nature of interpretive work when it works. it reads like something i knew all along but had forgotten, something that allows us “to recognize ourselves in the mess of the world as having been engaged and always being engaged” (hillman, 1996, p. 49). even if we leave such engagement undecoded, it increases the richness of the colours of red hens. there is a passage from the first volume of tsong-kha-pa’s the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (2000, p. 111) that i find myself returning to: “i compose this in order to condition my own mind.” if i may be so bold, i compose this, i write, in order to compose myself, in order to gain some fleet and failing composure in the face of the onrush of things. writing, when it works, does not despoil the richness and saturation of the colours. paying proper attention to experience breaks through the illusion of permanence. it can deepen the colours and can expand me beyond my own means of consolation: “by making the object of meditation extensive [you] expand your [own] mind” (tsong-kha-pa, 2002, p. 63). freedom the aim of interpretation, it could be said, is not just another interpretation but human freedom, which finds its light, identity and dignity in those few brief moments when one’s lived burdens can be shown to have their source in too limited a view of things. (smith, 1999, p. 29) and then, from the gelug tradition of tibetan buddhism, from tsong-kha-pa’s the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment: buddhapalita’s commentary on [nagarjuna’s] “fundamental treatise” says: what is the purpose of teaching dependent-arising? the master nagarjuna . . . saw that living beings are beset by various sufferings and assumed the task of teaching the reality of things . . . so that they might be free. [my emphasis] what is the reality of things? it is the absence of essence. unskilled persons . . . conceive of an essence in things [something fixed and final and permanent] and then generate attachment and hostility with regard to them. (tsong-kha-pa, 2002, p. 210) and from longchenpa’s finding rest in the nature of the mind (2017, p. 47): “through wisdom, freedom is achieved.” but it is not just my freedom that is frailly and momentarily won. interpretation frees its object of investigation to be what it is – dependently co-arising, rather than caught in the binds of grief and other afflictions that might reify. it lets john moules catch the thermals and fly up above the sunflowers even as my chest heaves at the thought. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 4 9 away you go, then, so we can console ourselves. so that you can remain with us beyond these dead and silent remains. references beamer, k. (2017). and coyote howled: listening to the call of interpretive inquiry. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 10. accessed on-line: http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/157. calvino, i. (1988). six memos for the next millennium. cambridge ma: harvard university press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method. new york, ny: continuum. harris, s. (2018). review of sufjan stevens (2017), the greatest gift. mix tape. outtakes, remixes and demos from carrie and lowell (stevens, 2015). mojo: the music magazine, issue 291, february 2018. london, uk: academic house. heidegger, m. (1927/1962). being and time. new york, ny: harper and row. hillman, j. (1996). healing fiction. woodstock, ct: spring publications. hillman, j. (2013). senex and puer. putnam ct: spring publications. hillman, j., & shamdasani, s. (2013). lament of the dead. new york, ny: w.w. norton. hongzhi, z. (1991). cultivating the empty field: the wilent illumination of zen master (t.d. leighton & y. wu, trans). san francisco, ca: north point press. husserl, e. (1970). the crisis of european science and transcendental phenomenology. evanston, il: northwestern university press. jardine, d. (2015). “you’re very clever young man.” in d. jardine, c. gilham, & g. mccaffrey, (2015). on the pedagogy of suffering: hermeneutic and buddhist meditations (pp. 7-18). new york, ny: peter lang. jardine, d. (2015a). quickening, patience, suffering. in d. jardine, c. gilham, & g. mccaffrey, (2015). on the pedagogy of suffering: hermeneutic and buddhist meditations (pp. 109-122). new york, ny: peter lang. jardine, d. (2016). in praise of radiant beings: a retrospective path through education, buddhism and ecology. charlotte, nc: information age publishing. jung. c.g. (1999). the red book. new york, ny: w.w. norton. longchenpa. (2017). finding rest in the nature of the mind. boulder, co: shambhala. http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/157 jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 4 10 moules, n.j. (2015). editorial. aletheia: remembering and enlivening. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 2. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5qr4p68 moules, n.j. (2017) editorial. grief and hermeneutics: archives of lives and the conflicted character of grief. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 1. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5h708h8 newsom, j. with paytress, m. (2015). “keep your eye on the rats!” joanna newsom speaks to mark paytress. mojo: the music magazine, issue #264, november 2015. london, uk: academic house. smith, d.g. (1999). pedagon: interdisciplinary essays in the human sciences, pedagogy and culture. new york, ny: peter lang. smith, d.g. (2006). trying to teach in a season of great untruth: globalization, empire and the crises of pedagogy. amsterdam, nl: sense publishing. stevens, s. (2015). death with dignity. from the cd carrie and lowell. asthmatic kitty records. catalog: akr099. release date: march 31, 2015. stevens, s. (2017). the greatest gift. mix tape. outtakes, remixes and demos from carrie and lowell. asthmatic kitty records. catalog: akr134. release date: november 24, 2017. tsong-kha-pa (2000). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume one. ithaca, ny: snow lion. tsong-kha-pa (2002). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume three. ithaca, ny: snow lion. tsong-kha-pa (2005). the six yogas of naropa. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. wallace, b. (1987). the stubborn particulars of grace. toronto, on, canada: mcclelland and stewart. wallace, d.f., with david lipsky. (2010). although of course you end up becoming yourself: a road trip with david foster wallace. new york, ny: broadway books. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5qr4p68 http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5h708h8 microsoft word tappmoules proof.docx 1 faculty of nursing, university of calgary calgary, ab t2n 1n4 corresponding author: dianne m. tapp, rn phd email: dtapp@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 16, 2012 the author(s) 2012 enlivening the rhetoric of family nursing: “there, in the midst of things, his whole family listening” dianne m. tapp1 and nancy j. moules1 abstract at the time that this study was conducted, family nursing practice in acute care hospital settings had received little attention in nursing research and theory. a hermeneutic inquiry explored nursing practices that involved families on three cardiac medical-surgical units in two hospitals in a large urban health care region in canada. data for the inquiry were generated through field observations with fifteen nurses and interviews with ten nurses. nurses supported and enabled family presence in these units but demonstrated limited evidence of deliberate family assessment and intervention. nurses espoused a familiar rhetoric that claimed that family nursing exists because of the inevitability of encounters with family members throughout daily work. nurses wished to appear to include family members in their practice and emphasized the importance of family teaching. still, nurses’ ability to articulate the nature of this practice was limited. family nursing rhetoric is explored as a potentially legitimate discourse that underlies current trends influencing nursing of families, particularly the impact of early discharge and increased reliance on family members to provide care at home during early recovery. keywords family nursing, family presence, family intervention, hermeneutics, gadamer enlivening the rhetoric of family nursing: “there, in the midst of things, his whole family listening” (wallace, 1988, p. 110) illness in families is an inescapable presence inherent in our human condition. some illnesses are minor and create little, if any, disruption to family life. other illnesses, either acute or chronic, time limited or life limiting, can have an enormous impact on families at every level of functioning. it is when illness arrives, and the intersection of nurses and families is necessitated through health care encounters and environments, that the practices of family nursing are, in theory, called tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 2 into action. what is not known, however, is how often these practices truly live up to that which they aspire to in theory. in this paper, we describe a hermeneutic inquiry that guided an exploration of these questions with nurses working on three cardiac medical-surgical units in two hospitals in a large urban health region in western canada. through this inquiry, a rhetoric of family nursing became apparent that was seemingly uninformed by deliberate family nursing assessment and intervention. we highlight the importance of family nursing rhetoric as a discourse that underlies practice since nurses are increasingly obligated to include family members to achieve shortened length of hospital stay, and to prepare family members to provide care at home during early recovery. background and literature review at the time of the conduct of this study, the nursing of families of adult patients in hospital medical and surgical units had received little attention from nurse researchers and theorists. the literature, however, reflects longstanding interest in family-centered care related to hospitalization of children and maternal-child care in labour and delivery. exploration of family needs in critical care settings has been extensively documented over the past two decades (ågård & harder, 2007; brown, deeny, & mcllroy, 2000; chien, chiu, lam, & ip, 2006; davidson, 2009; engsötrm & söderberg, 2007; hickey, 1990; leske, 1991; mitchell, chaboyer, burmeister, & foster, 2009; stahan & brown, 2005). more recently, there has been interest in family presence during invasive procedures and during resuscitation in emergency departments (basol, ohman, simones, & skillings, 2009; baumhover & hughes, 2009; eichorn et al., 2001; fernandez, compton, jones, & velilla, 2009; funk & farber, 2009; happ et al., 2007; henderson & knapp, 2006; mcmahonparkes, moule, benger, & albarran, 2009; maclean et al., 2003; miller & stiles, 2009). tucker (2002) noted, with irony, the slow shifts in health care professionals’ acceptance of family presence in hospital settings. in the 1970s, hospital labor and delivery units allowed for fathers and family members’ presence at the beginning of life (draper, 1997, friedewald, fletcher, & fairbairn, 2005, leavitt, 2003; martin-arafeh, watson, & baird, 1999). decades later, there is increasing acceptance of family presence at the end of life (andershed, 2006; fridh, forsberg, & bergbom, 2009; meert, briller, schim, & thurston, 2008; teno, casey, welch, & edgman-levitan, 2001; truog et al., 2008). there has been increasing interest in the impact of chronic and life-threatening illnesses on family members. with shifting demographics that reflect the “graying” of the north american population, there is interest in the roles of family members in care of the elderly and the potential for caregiver burden. the nature of the family-nurse relationship has been explored in critical care settings (chesla, 1996; chesla & stannard, 1997), long term care (gladstone, duuis, & wexler, 2007; gladstone & wexler, 2001; wardgriffin, bol, hay, & dashnay, 2003), and community settings (hunt, 1991; kellett & mannion, 1999). åstedt kurki, lehti, paunonen, and paavilainen (1999) explored the impact of hospitalization on families with a member in a neurological ward and in acute care settings in finland (åstedt-kurki, paavilainen, tammentie, & paunonen-ilmonen, 2001). may, ellis-hill, and payne (2001) examined everyday interactions between family members and multidisciplinary health care providers. yet, within most of this older literature, the family-nurse relationship and the practice of family nursing on adult hospital medical and surgical nursing units had remained untapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 3 der-theorized and relatively invisible. in more recent years, there has been increased focus on this relationship (azoulay et al., 2003; benzein, johansson, årestedt, & saveman, 2008; gavaghan & carroll, 2002; lefebvre, pelchat, & levert, 2007; maxwell, stuenkel, & saylor, 2007; pryzby, 2005; tarnowski goodell & harmon hanson, 1999; van horn & kautz, 2007; yetman, 2009). it is this aspect of the family-nurse relationship that led to this study and these questions guided an exploration of aspects of family nursing practice and perspectives: what is the character of hospital nurses’ interventions and interactions with family members? how do nurses involve family members during hospital care and how do they address family concerns? family nursing practice study this study was motivated by the observation that, despite good intentions, family-focused nursing care in adult hospital settings continues to be a remote goal in canadian healthcare systems. our purpose in this inquiry was to explore and describe family nursing practices that support involvement of family members in health care encounters and address the concerns and difficulties of families with a member hospitalized with cardiac health problems. research approach this interpretive inquiry was guided by the philosophical hermeneutics tenets of hansgeorg gadamer (1976, 1960/1989). as a contemporary and student of heidegger, gadamer extended a tradition of hermeneutic thought that is increasingly the basis of interpretive research in nursing (fleming, gaidys, & robb 2003; geanellos 1998; moules, 2002; walsh 1996). gadamer’s unique contribution included his explication of genuine conversation as a distinctive mode of understanding in the human sciences. he explored hermeneutic conversation as the dialectic of question and answer, the playful to and fro of dialogue, and the stance of holding out the possibility within dialogue that the other might be right (binding & tapp, 2008; gadamer 1960/1989). gadamer revealed the productive possibility of our pre-understandings or prejudices and challenged the concept of prejudice as a negative or limiting bias in human understanding. prejudices come into play in the hermeneutic circle, a metaphor for interpretive understanding where beginning conjectures are developed and put into play in writing, practice, and dialogue to sound out their merit and credibility. conjectures are revised, reconsidered, and recycled until a sufficient description of the phenomenon can be offered. a productive account explores and extends understanding by addressing traditions of meaning (e.g. cultural, professional, and social discourses) that the author or participant could not or did not explicitly consider. gadamer’s work guides nursing research through a philosophical stance rather than a methodological framework for generating and analyzing text. prejudices and pre-understandings while we acknowledge that it is impossible to specify in advance the biases and prejudices that shape our understandings of the research topic, there are some beginning understandings that informed the research team’s approach to this inquiry. we assumed that nurses in hospital settings do nurse family members and that such practices are relational and occur in dialogue. as such, there is a risk that family nursing practices are less amenable to measurement and observation, and thus less visible to those concerned with evidence of the impact of nursing interventions on health care outcomes. we believed not only that family members ought to be included in hospital care but also that those families want to be acknowledged and involved. we believed that resources, unit routines, and hospital poltapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 4 icies powerfully shape nursing of families. in addition to interviewing nurses about their practices, we wanted to account for organizational supports and constraints that shape nurses’ work with families. we anticipated that fieldwork would enable us to witness nurses’ engagement with families and to appreciate the complexity of family nursing practice in acute care hospital settings. research process participants included 15 staff nurses on three cardiac nursing units at two teaching hospitals in a large health region in western canada. nurses were recruited through small group presentations to nurses on each unit. in qualitative work, the goal of recruitment is to engage participants who can best speak to the phenomenon of interest (moules, 2002). this may also be the most significant limitation of this inquiry: participating nurses may be those who were most interested in family nursing and thus most inclusive of families. though their perspectives and practice may not be representative of their colleagues, this was not the goal of the inquiry. the aim was to reveal family nursing as it appears in these particular nursing units rather than to claim that the descriptions that follow constitute typical nursing practice. a total of 34 field visits (170 hours) were conducted. most nurses were job-shadowed (non-participant observation) on at least two occasions by the lead researcher or a graduate student. researchers were interested in observing routine nursing practice to witness encounters between nurses and family members. they were present on a variety of shifts from early morning until late evening. ethical approval was obtained from the conjoint health research ethics board of the university of calgary. informed consent was obtained from nurse participants, and the researcher obtained verbal consent from patients and family members to whom the nurse was assigned for the shift. immediately following each observation, researchers wrote fieldnotes based on recollections and brief notes made during the visit. several months later, 10 of these nurses were interviewed. the time delay was not related to the observation process but more a function of the research process. it was not intended that observations and interviews be linked. two nurses declined participation in the second phase of the study and three others could not be located. using unstructured interviews, we explored instances of family nursing that they believed reflected their everyday practice or that stood out as significant to them. these dialogues provided opportunities to inquire about particular thematics that became apparent within the initial interpretations of the field notes. interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. the research team was comprised of two faculty members, two graduate students (one doctoral and one master of nursing), and one registered nurse who worked as a staff nurse on one of the participating nursing units. all research team members were involved in the interpretation of text generated through field notes and interviews by independently reviewing all transcripts and preparing interpretive memos. the findings presented here offer a weaving of these interpretive writings, as our understanding of the phenomenon of the family-nurse relationship in this setting was uncovered through this process. family presence each of the three participating units had visiting guidelines but nurses had significant discretion regarding implementation. though it was usually family members who were present during the morning hours, general visitors were increasingly present throughout the afternoon and evening. in the telemetry areas, tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 5 nurses were more likely to enforce an afternoon rest period and ensure an early bedtime. each unit had a small number of private rooms and a larger number of two-bed rooms. two units had a few four-bed wards and a small cardiac telemetry unit for patients requiring more intensive monitoring. the physical environment had a significant impact on family presence as the semi-private, four-bed wards, and telemetry units afforded very little physical space or privacy to accommodate family visiting. both hospitals were built 20 to 40 years ago and were not designed to provide facilities for family members. each unit had a large waiting room with couches, television, and telephone access. none of these units provided overnight facilities for family members. an exception might occur if the patient spoke no english and family members were needed to assist with translation and communication. if a family member wished to stay overnight, nurses occasionally placed a reclining chair or stretcher at the patient’s bedside in a private room. this was typically discouraged in other rooms. nurses in this study implicitly accepted family presence in a manner that would have been considered extraordinary in hospitals thirty years ago. some nurses commented on differences they noticed over time in hospital policies and practices regarding visiting hours. within the limitations of physical space and visiting policies, there was a prevailing ethos that recognized family entitlement and desire to be present. nurses anticipated that family members are entitled not only to be present but also to ask questions, receive information, and know details of diagnostic and treatment plans. although variations were observed and reported in nurses’ comfort with family presence during routine activities, many nurses actively encouraged family presence. anytime i want to do something with the patient, the family is usually there and i usually tell them “okay i’m going to do this” or, i want to give them (the patient) some information about bypass surgery or having a pacemaker put in …and if they make as though they’re going to leave i say “no, no that’s fine, just stay cause i’d like you all to have this information.” so i usually, unless i’m doing something personal with the patient it’s obviously not appropriate to have family there, i prefer to have them stay and listen. nurses knew how to make the system more accommodating of families and sometimes found creative ways to enable family presence when they would normally not be allowed. exceptions were more likely made when the patient did not speak english and family members were required to translate. nurses frequently commented on benefits to the patient when the family could be present. family members were not expected to assist with physical care but were recognized as a source of emotional and social support to the patient. by involving family members in incidental patient teaching and structured group classes, nurses believed that the family would be prepared to help the patient manage symptoms and the treatment plan more effectively at home. nurses appreciated that family members would reinforce important information about recovery at home. nurses believed that information helped family members understand illness and recovery, reducing family stress and anxiety. for me, knowing what’s really going on with a patient is knowing what’s going on in their family and who is visiting them and how does that impact them …to really care for that patient you have to know who the family are and what they’re about and what is the relationship. and just letting them understand what’s going on, i think helps that person as well…what do they have to offer to this situation as well. tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 6 you can gain lots of information that you might not gain from your patient even, from the family. nurses recognized family members as a resource, having something “to offer to the situation.” they acknowledged that the family is more able to interpret the patient’s behavior, needs, and responses because they know the patient better. family members can speak for patients’ preferences in situations where patients cannot. nurses acknowledged the importance of family involvement to maintain vigilance regarding patient safety, and the occasional need for family members to advocate for the patient. some family members wished to assist with aspects of physical care. acknowledgement of family presence nurses in this study implicitly accepted family presence at the bedside. the extent to which family members were acknowledged by nurses and engaged in dialogue varied greatly. nurses practice in individual ways, with their own rituals for introductions at the beginning of the shift. nurses’ introductions typically focused on patients, with varying attempts to address family members or visitors. visitors who were at the bedside early in the day were more likely to be family members or significant caregivers; those visiting throughout the day were not necessarily family members. nurses displayed tact and discretion as they encountered others at the bedside. what kind of visitor is this: a relative, neighbour, pastor, friend, or caregiver? a clarification of the kind of visitor helped ensure that when information was offered to appropriate persons and with the patient’s consent. some nurses made negligible attempts to greet, engage, or acknowledge family members present at the bedside. they might not direct any comments to those present unless the member first addressed the nurse or asked a question. the nurse might assume that if the patient did not introduce others, they did not want them involved. sometimes nurses launched immediately into a start-of-shift assessment or problem-focused dialogue, asking visitors to leave for the sake of privacy. these nurses tended to be patient focused and pragmatic about the patient’s physical needs and concerns. such instances occurred both in situations when nurses were pressed for time, and when the unit pace was more relaxed. how might acknowledgement of family members matter in nursing practice? to acknowledge is to recognize or accept something or someone as valid, to show and admit a noticing (pearsall & trumble, 1996). to acknowledge is to make visible. when acknowledged by nurses, family members come to light as connected to the patient and as meaningful to the health care situation. providing appropriate and sensitive care rests upon understanding of the involved persons’ unique concerns that contribute to possibilities for healing and recovery (benner, 1999). levine (1998) suggested that family members want recognition that they, too, are undergoing something; are important in the life of the patient; and make a contribution to the patient’s well-being and recovery. when family members are over-looked at the bedside, does this diminish their expectation or willingness to express their own needs, seek information, or offer their perspectives? despite increased family presence in hospital settings, we observed that nursing practice on these units remains extensively patient rather than family focused. even when family members were present, nurses typically attuned their gaze and attention almost exclusively to the patient. any gaze carries responsibility and obligation. if a nurse engages the family, there is a necessary responsiveness to what emerges within the encounter: if i hold tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 7 my gaze too long and family members engage me, i am obligated to address their concerns. although nurses usually did not directly inquire about how individual family members were coping with the hospitalization, they did engage in introductions, comments, and a gaze of looking directly at families, and this seemed to have the effect of recognizing family presence and putting them at ease. the word “engage” means to occupy, hold another’s attention, and commit or promise (pearsall & trumble, 1996). family members most often appeared to be distinctly in the nurse’s peripheral vision where the nurse, by avoiding the family members’ direct gaze, could also limit their questions and contain the time required at the bedside if necessary. may, ellis-hill, and payne (2001) proposed that this is a deliberate relational practice by which nurses control demands on their time and the nature of their work. hupcey (1998) identified strategies used by both families and nurses in the process of developing the family-nurse relationship in the intensive care setting. nursing strategies that inhibited the relationship included refusing to chat, avoiding eye contact, refusing to acknowledge family members, being too busy to answer family questions, and maintaining an efficient attitude that focused on physical care. each of these strategies was evident at times in the fieldwork undertaken for this inquiry. on being a visitor in one sense, both patients and family members are visitors to the hospital setting, in a terrain where they may not have previous experience. there are explicit rules for visiting hours, rest periods, and numbers of visitors allowed. there are informal and unwritten norms about relationships with health care providers, and ways to access information and influence decision-making. nurses have latitude, discretion, and power to bend rules, helping patients and families navigate this terrain. in this geography of limited space, shared rooms, and interrupted schedules, nurses often attempted a semblance of privacy behind thin curtains, creating a comfortable space for patients and family to feel more “at home” than visiting. we observed many nurses at the start of the shift postponing assessments or tasks with patients when there were visitors present. they would purposefully pass by the room and return to see the patient later. this could be understood as avoidance or a missed opportunity to meet and engage family members. nurses might also view family presence as an obstacle to care, perhaps assuming that the assessment of the patient would take longer. in some instances when nurses purposely did not approach patients with visitors, the nurses seemingly assumed visitor status for themselves and avoided interrupting the family’s time together. in these circumstances, nurses recognized themselves as the outsider or visitor to the patient/family relationship. in this awareness, nurses respectfully avoided intrusion on family terrain, creating space and small moments of privacy for families. bringing the family and the nurse into the situation there were no formal approaches to family assessment observed in practice or described in the interviews. when nurses did inquire about the family situation, it was typically in the context of what might be construed as social conversation; the simplicity of the questions asked by nurses was remarkable. the nurse might ask a couple “how are you two making out?”, or ask a spouse “how are you managing at home?” questions were sometimes open ended but often linear and closed: “tell me about your family”, or “is your wife well?” or “what kind of work does your husband do?”, or “do you have kids or grandkids?” nurses purposefully pursued casual tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 8 lines of questions woven throughout their work as a way to get to know the person and family, to understand what kind of support and information were needed, and to prepare for returning home. this inquiry was typically described as being in service of nurses’ emphasis on patient teaching. some nurses noted that families vary greatly in their need for support from nurses. for many patients and families, hospitalization is an unexpected crisis. it may involve a new diagnosis, or may be an omen of progressive health deterioration. nurses described the discretion and judgment required as they interpreted family distress. they stand farther back, they’re afraid to get involved, they’re afraid to ask questions. not all families are like that, but you see it often. they’re afraid. they don’t know what to do. they don’t know what to say. they don’t know where to stand …they are clearly very upset and not knowing what to do …you can maybe see the stress, or they don’t say anything to anyone, they just sit there kind of blank. patient and family distress is heightened when they experience a cardiac hospitalization as a life-threatening event, an existential threat leaving them feeling groundless. in this instance, not knowing “where to stand” occurs on multiple levels as both patient and family try to understand cardiac illness and how to navigate the hospital environment: what do i need to know? what should ask? whom should i ask? what should we be looking for? what does the future hold? how will our lives be changed? as nurses read the family situation, they are taking into account where and how the family is standing on this unfamiliar and shifting terrain. nurses gradually brought patients and family along, encouraging them to ask questions and voice concerns, helping them to interpret diagnostics and treatment plans, and guiding them to anticipate important features of recovery for their return home. much of this work of “reading the family situation” is unspoken in practice. many of the cues that nurses read to interpret anxiety, distress, coping, and need for support are nonverbal. nurses struggled to explain their practice with distressed families, offering inarticulate, vague, and uncertain descriptions of how they came to understand these situations. my nature is just seeing. i can see a lot by just seeing. i’m just reading their cues, like just reading their body language [for] tiredness, frustration. even more difficult were nurses’ attempts to explain how they addressed situations that called for emotional support, conveying caring through dialogue, presence, and touch. although nurses knew something important was needed and something was happening, they could not find language that embraced such actions or meanings. nurses made efforts to bring family into the hospital situation and help them feel comfortable and secure in this foreign terrain. in nurses’ practice and stories of practice, it was also obvious that they brought themselves into the family situation, and described this as an intention to build rapport with the family. that joking, that superficial stuff, it has meaning…it has a way of breaking the ice and letting them, and sharing some of your life with them. i think that really helps. …cause if you’re willing to share your life with them, they’re willing to share their frustrations and whatever is happening with them. tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 9 nurses felt connected to families by virtue of similar circumstances in their own families, family relationships that held special meaning to them, or personal experiences that resonated with family encounters in hospital. sometimes nurses commented on these personal experiences with patients and families, or during the research interview they acknowledged the impact of these personal circumstances on their practices. many nurses noted that their commitment to family nursing was bolstered by a personal experience with an ill family member. just put yourself in that person’s or that family’s situation and see…how would you feel if that was your dad, what would you want out of it? i went through something like that with my mom. and i remember some good experiences and some not so good experiences that i had with the nurses and with the staff. and really the good ones outweigh the bad ones. although nurses connected with families in ways that brought them into family situations, some family members also brought nurses into their particular situations. occasionally, family members engaged nurses by remembering a nurse’s name, seeking the nurse out to ask questions, inquiring about the nurse’s own family or personal life, and offering non-verbal cues of acknowledgement and recognition. family members often initiated interaction with the nurse by volunteering responses to questions directed to the patient, or cautiously seeking information, frequently with an apology offered for consuming the nurse’s time. this reciprocity of nurse and family bringing each other into this particular situation was significant. how family members participate in this relationship does make a difference to the ways they are included. the nurse needs to get comfortable with the patient and family, and to feel acknowledged and respected by them. family teaching and discharge preparation although nurses varied in the extent to which they deliberately engaged family members and viewed themselves as responsible for providing emotional support to family, nurses consistently described their practice with families as patient teaching and discharge preparation. some apologized at the end of a field visit that family members were not present to be able to show the researcher more teaching interventions. many nurses immediately launched into their research interviews by claiming the importance of family teaching within their practice. we deal with families every day. so it’s encouraged to get information, and because we do a lot of focus on discharge planning and getting the person ready to go home. you have to deal with families and loved ones to get information and find out their needs to plan this. facilitate them going home. that’s a big part of contact with families. the constantly reiterated belief about nursing of families in this practice setting was that family members need teaching. and it’s a teaching thing…because one way to get the patient out quicker is if the family is there and they know exactly what to deal with these things [that] get stressful at home if they don’t know what to deal with and what to expect. so if we’re teaching and reassuring and reinforcing things everyday, like, “this is how he’s doing right now and this is what he needs to work on”, and that makes them feel better, too. embedded through these explanations was the explicit drive to teach family members as part of discharge preparation. this work was tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 10 clearly motivated by nurses’ roles in moving patients through the system to maintain effective bed utilization. first day they’re in, it’s looking at going home because it’s quick and you got to be on that plan all the time. impromptu teaching in the midst of other nursing activities was both described and observed in practice. nurses typically practiced with awareness that family members were present, watching, and listening. for example, if i’m doing incision care, i’ll go over what we do with the incision, looking for signs of infections, that type of thing …. if we’re doing morning care or evening care, then it’s a good time for teaching …. a lot of it is for discharge teaching. but a big part of that is how are they going to cope at home, in terms of them and their families. and do they have help at home. this nurse believed that families are informed and reassured “there, in the midst” (wallace, 1987, p. 110) of practice, as she talked aloud during the dressing change or staple removal, or explained what nurses do about feet swelling. as she made her nursing care audible, she uncovered her observations about the patient’s needs and progress for the family. much of the family teaching was informal and embedded as nurses provided information, responded to, and encouraged family questions. this emphasis on family teaching may be a way to categorize interactions between the nurse and the family. the event of teaching might be included in the list of responsibilities and tasks that the nurse accomplishes. the continued reliance on the categorization and language of “family teaching,” however, suggested something else to this research team. this language may be a way to offer description of something that exists but is not articulated, that might be held up as something more legitimate in the professional context than listening, being present, or inquiring into the family’s emotional domain. the latter might be viewed within scientific or medical discourse as a softer, less valid role of nursing. alternately, family teaching might be regarded as a more vital and significant nursing activity. it might offer a context for interaction with the family, an opportunity for time, concern, attention, and caring. we began to question whether “family teaching” provides a name in which to capture a complexity of work with families that is often beyond description or articulation. rhetoric of family nursing this inquiry intended to show the character of nurses’ practices as they addressed family concerns and involved family members during hospitalization for cardiac illness. hermeneutic inquiry begins with a sense of heightened attunement to something in particular. there is anticipation of un-concealment, the possibility of revealing new understandings, and the prospect of practicing differently because of understanding differently. in many regards, one could say that the findings reported are commonly shared meanings of everyday nursing practice that contribute little to new understandings of family nursing. how do we accommodate this disappointment of the familiar? how can we understand differently when what is uncovered is seemingly obviously present, previously stated, or widely known and appreciated? there was also a disappointment that, at the time of this study, family nursing theory seemingly had little impact on the clinical practice we were exploring. we discovered that discrete events of family assessment and intervention were exceedingly rare. none of tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 11 the nurses overtly used genograms, ecomaps, or other family assessment tools within their practice. nurses rarely inquired about the impact of the hospitalization on other family members. it was extremely rare that nurses intentionally engaged family members to address a particular therapeutic goal or intervention. family nursing was most often equated with family teaching activities. involvement of family members frequently focused exclusively on discharge preparation. we witnessed superficial conversation with families, missed opportunities to inquire more meaningfully into family concerns, and dutiful questioning of family without attunement to their responses. nursing of family members seemed to occur in a haphazard manner rather than as a deliberate consideration in the nurse’s practice. nurses, however, described themselves as welcoming and valuing family presence. during the fieldwork, nurses were respectful of families and consistently responsive to questions from family members. in the interviews, we frequently heard declarations of interest in families, and their sense that family nursing is an inherent part of practice. it just seems like an everyday thing …families are involved every day. i’m big on family. families are always involved. and certainly on the unit i’m on, with these patients waiting to go for bypass surgery or waiting for anything, families are very very concerned and so forth, and they’re always around. we have to involve the families because they need to be a part of the care-giving process after the surgery. there were oft-repeated echoes of the importance of family teaching to help the patient, reduce family members’ anxiety, and ease the transition to discharge. some nurses even noted that family members need information to prevent heart disease for themselves. we observed that nurses constantly gleaned information through both formal and social conversations about the context in which the patient lived and to which they would be returning. participants often found it difficult to offer exemplars of family nursing, describe their nursing practice with families, and articulate what family nursing means to them. is the presence, support, and inclusion of families so ingrained in practice that one can barely comment upon it? does it mean that family nursing is not happening if nurses have difficulty explaining and illustrating it? nurses were keen to have their practice appear as family-oriented. in these endorsements of the significance of family nursing, however, their declarations often appeared as rhetoric that fell short within the simple instances of family nursing that they offered during the interviews. within this rhetoric, it was assumed that family presence is related to the inherent necessity of family nursing in hospital settings: families simply are present and thus deserve to be addressed in some way. the rhetoric was undercut even further when contrasted with the observations of practice from the field visits. there was extremely limited evidence of intentional family assessment or intervention within their practice. we began to question whether there is a gap between the espoused ideal of family nursing and the realities of everyday practice. these nurses seemed to believe that happenstance encounters with family members, responding to members’ family questions, or simply asking about or referring to family members constitutes family nursing. might these limited practices be insufficient yet constitutive of family nursing? is family nursing just so much rhetoric? tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 12 at first glance, rhetoric can be understood as language that is pretentious, showy, or elaborate but essentially void of meaningful ideas or sincere emotion (agnes & guralnik, 1999). do declarations that family nursing is valued and significant truly hold up in meaningful ways in everyday practice? at one point a decade ago, baumann (2000) asserted that family nursing is nursing theory anemic and deprived, but the theory has evolved since then. even though accessible in theory, however, our study suggested that family nursing theories and practice models do not generally appear to be useful, or actively applied, in practice in acute care hospital settings. how do we understand that the practice of family nursing in generalist hospital practice settings has been under-theorized and resistant to description and explanation? must we persist with rhetorical statements that value family nursing without explicating more fully the contribution that such practice might make to health care? we came to realize that family nursing rhetoric makes a statement of import. another version of rhetoric is “the art of speaking well” that carries conviction and is convincing “as long as we do not trivialize it” (gadamer 1986, 17). rhetoric coming from the greek “rhetorica” is the art of persuasion. skepticism of nurses’ declarations of the importance of family presence and involvement might invite us to overlook something of significance that is happening in their practice. at a most basic level, families are a feature of hospital nursing practice. they are present. they will continue to be present in hospitals for the foreseeable future. it is no longer a choice whether or not to nurse families. shortened length of hospital stay has an impact on family members, who assume responsibility (whether desired or not) for a much greater proportion of post-discharge recovery than was the case in past. nurses recognize this impact on family members, and they require the assistance of family members to be able to move patients through the system efficiently. in the past, it was more or less, okay you dealt with the patient, that’s it. now we’re seeing that … family members have to be involved in their care. when we’re sending people home, especially in our elderly population, they need to know what medications they’re on, they need to have some concrete information on what’s happening with their loved one. and it’s the whole thing has just shifted. this raised the awareness of the research team that, as our expectations of family members shift, we need to consider how the boundaries, obligations, and relational capacity to families must shift as well. if there is truth and significance in family nursing rhetoric, we must understand rhetoric differently. bruns (2002) proposed that rhetoric is a call to action in the context of complex systems where one must understand at least provisionally in order to survive. rhetoric is… a mode of responsibility rather than, purely and simply, a mode of knowledge; it responds to the need for action by producing a consensus in the absence of sufficient (that is, self-evident) reasons…. rhetoric is a real world construction of a provisional order of reason, a practical construction of what is reasonable in a world where randomness and contingency can not be eliminated. (p. 51) family nursing practice is a relational practice that occurs in dialogue and relationship, exif there is truth and significance in family nursing rhetoric, we must understand rhetoric differently. tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 13 change and reciprocity. these elements of nursing practice are most resistant to measurement, specification, prediction, and control. family nursing occurs in those happenstance and haphazard moments when families are present and when questions, needs, and concerns are visible. the apparent lack of deliberation and therapeutic intention could be as much a feature of the fragmented nursing practice context as it might be a criticism of the awareness or skillfulness of the nurse. responsibility borne by family nursing rhetoric family nursing rhetoric offers a mode of attunement to families in the midst of everyday nursing practice. hamrick (2002) proposed that such attunement is always particularized in some definite mood, a disposition of feeling that persistently attends to the welfare of the other. attunement does not happen in isolation but always in harmony with, and relationship to, something or someone else. the attunement that lies at the heart of family nursing rhetoric creates possibilities for nurses to become available to families and responsive to their needs. such rhetoric is a reflection of nurses’ felt obligation to engage and involve family members. the productivity of this rhetoric in the present and future lies not simply in a verbal tribute to the significance of family nursing but in the action and responsiveness that needs to occur in practice. family nursing rhetoric claims that family nursing exists because of the inevitability of encounters with family members throughout nurses’ daily work. it would appear that enabling and acknowledging family presence is important but, in itself, insufficient. how does family nursing rhetoric shed light on the responsibilities that nurses bear towards families? benner (1999) highlighted the crucial significance of nurses’ actions that enabled family presence in critical care settings: family presence provided information that oriented the family to the patient’s critical condition and trajectory, helping “grasp [the] changing clinical relevance” of the situation (p. 318). this served, in some instances, to sustain hope for recovery and, in others, to prepare for the patient’s impending demise. there is a future orientation to such meaning-making that resonates deeply with nurses’ intent to provide families with information in the context of this study, but it is differently nuanced. the extent to which nurses in this study emphatically laid claim to their teaching roles with family members becomes more understandable. nurses consistently cited their obligation to family teaching to prepare family members to support the recovery of the patient at home. nurses know that family members will bear the work that is imposed by earlier hospital discharges. when an understanding of rhetoric shifts from a meaningless and insincere showing to a persuasive language of argument that serves to extend and share common and important insights, nurses move into a new awareness of obligation. this obligation consists of learning how to live up to an embraced rhetoric. rhetoric is created and sustained by its own repetition; it argues for itself in its apparentness and the compelling evidence of its very presence. the obligation and responsibility that is birthed in a rhetoric embraced in family nursing is one that involves more than simple acknowledgement of family presence or family teaching. it calls for a relational attunement to family, a commitment to family nursing and living up to the rhetoric that defines it. in the midst of major life events of illness, hospitalization, healing, or death “the whole family” watching and listening, family nursing takes a place and assumes a shape that must necessarily live up to itself and all that it claims. tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 14 declaration of conflicting interests the authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. funding the authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. funding for this research was provided by the social sciences and humanities research council of canada (2001-2004) bios dianne m. tapp, rn, phd is dean and professor in the faculty of nursing, university of calgary. nancy j. moules, rn, phd is a professor in the faculty of nursing, university of calgary and holds the alberta children’s hospital foundation/alberta children’s hospital research institute nursing professorship in child and family centred cancer care. references ågård, a. s., & harder, i. (2007). relatives' experiences in intensive care--finding a place in a world of uncertainty. intensive and critical care nursing, 23, 170-177. agnes, m., & guralnik, g.b., (eds.). (1999). webster’s new world college dictionary (4th ed.). new york, ny: macmillan. andershed, b. (2006). relatives in end-of-life care--part 1: a systematic review of the literature the five last years, january 1999february 2004. journal of clinical nursing, 15, 1158-1169. åstedt kurki, p., lehti, k., paunonen, m., & paavilainen, e. (1999). family member as a hospital patient: sentiments and functioning of the family. international journal of nursing practice, 5, 155-163. åstedt-kurki, p., paavilainen, e., tammentie, t., & paunonen-ilmonen, m. (2001). interaction between family members and health care providers in an acute care setting in finland. journal of family nursing, 7, 371-390. azoulay, e., pochard, f., chevret, s., arich, c., brivet, f., brun, f., et al. (2003). family participation in care to the critically ill: opinions of families and staff. intensive care medicine, 29, 1498-1504. basol, r., ohman, k., simones, j., & skillings, k. (2009). using research to determine support for a policy on family presence during resuscitation. dimensions of critical care nursing, 28(5), 237-247. baumann, s. l. (2000). family nursing: theory-anemic, nursing theory-deprived. nursing science quarterly, 13(4), 285-290. baumhover, n., & hughes, l. (2009). spirituality and support for family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitations in adults. american journal of critical care, 18, 357-366. benner, p., hooper-kyriakidis, p., & stannard, d. (1999). clinical wisdom and interventions in critical care: a thinking-inaction approach. philadelphia, pa: w.b. saunders. benzein, e., johansson, p., årestedt, k. f., & saveman, b. i. (2008). nurses’ attitudes about the importance of families in nursing care. journal of family nursing, 14, 162-180. tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 15 binding, l. l., & tapp, d. m. (2008). human understanding in dialogue: gadamer’s recovery of the genuine. nursing philosophy, 9, 121-130. brown, r., deeny, p., & mcllroy, d. (2000). family needs in critical care settings: a comparison of the perceptions of nurses and family members. all ireland journal of nursing and midwifery, 1, 108-115. bruns, g. (2002). the hermeneutical anarchist: phronesis, rhetoric, and the experience of art. in j. malpas, u. arnswald, & j. kertscher (eds.), gadamer’s century: essays in honor of hans-georg gadamer, (pp. 4576). cambridge, ma: mit press. chesla, c. a. (1996). reconciling technological and family care in critical-care nursing. image, 28(3), 199-203. chesla, c. a., & stannard, d. (1997). breakdown in the nursing care of families in the icu. american journal of critical care, 6(1), 64-71. chien, w. t., chiu, y. l., lam, l. w., & ip, w. y. (2006). effects of a needs-based education programme for family carers with a relative in an intensive care unit: a quasiexperimental study. international journal of nursing studies, 43, 39-50. davidson, j. e. (2009). family-centered care: meeting the needs of patients' families and helping families adapt to critical illness. critical care nurse, 29(3), 28-34. draper, j. (1997). whose welfare in the labour room? a discussion of the increasing trend of fathers' birth attendance. midwifery, 13(3), 132-138. eichorn, d. j., meyers, t. a., guzzetta, c. e., clark, a. p., lein, j. d., taliaferro, e., & calvin, a. o. (2001). family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation: hearing the voice of the patient. american journal of nursing, 101(5), 48-55. fernandez, r., compton, s., jones, k. a., & velilla, m. a. (2009). the presence of a family witness impacts physician performance during simulated medical codes. critical care medicine, 37, 1956-1960. fleming, v., gaidys, u., & robb, y. (2003). hermeneutic research in nursing: developing a gadamerian-based research method. nursing inquiry, 10(2), 113-120. fridh, i., forsberg, a., & bergbom, i. (2009). doing one's utmost: nurses' descriptions of caring for dying patients in an intensive care environment. intensive and critical care nursing, 25, 233-241. friedewald, m., fletcher, r., & fairbairn, h. (2005). all-male discussion forums for expectant fathers: evaluation of a model. the journal of perinatal education, 14(2), 8-18. funk, r. n., & farber, j. s. (2009). partners in care: implementing a policy on family member passengers. air medical journal, 28, 31-36. gadamer, h. g. (1960/1989). truth and method, (2nd rev. ed.) (j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h. g. (1976). philosophical hermeneutics. berkeley, ca: university of california press. gadamer, h. g. (1986). the relevance of the beautiful and other essays. cambridge, uk: cambridge university press. gavaghan, s. r., & carroll, d. l. (2002). families of critically ill patients and the effect tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 16 of nursing interventions. dimensions of critical care nursing, 21, 64-71. geanellos, r. (1998). hermeneutic philosophy. part i: implications of its use as methodology in interpretive nursing research. nursing inquiry, 5(3), 154-163. gladstone, j. w., & wexler, e. (2001). the development of relationships between families and staff in long-term care facilities: nurses’ perspectives. canadian journal on aging, 21(2), 217-228. gladstone, j. w., dupuis, s., & wexler, e. (2007). ways that families engage with staff in long-term care facilities. canadian journal on aging, 26(4), 391-402. hamrick, w. s. (2002). kindness and the good society: connections of the heart. new york, ny: state university of new york press. happ, m. b., swigart, v. a., tate, j. a., arnold, r. m., sereika, s. m., & hoffman, l. a. (2007). family presence and surveillance during weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. heart & lung, 36, 47-57. henderson, d. p., & knapp, j. f. (2006). report of the national consensus conference on family presence during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation and procedures. journal of emergency nursing, 32, 23-29. hickey, m. (1990). what are the needs of families of critically ill patients? a review of the literature since 1976. heart & lung, 19, 401-415. hunt, m. (1991). being friendly and informal: reflected in nurses’ terminally ill patients’ and relatives’ conversations at home. journal of advanced nursing, 16, (8), 929-938. hupcey, j. e. (1998). establishing the nursefamily relationship in the intensive care unit. western journal of nursing research, 20(2), 180-194. kellett, u. m., & mannion, j. (1999). meaning in caring: reconceptualizing the nursefamily care relationship in community practice. journal of advanced nursing, 29(3), 697-703. leavitt, j. w. (2003). what do men have to do with it? fathers and mid-twentieth-century childbirth. bulletin of the history of medicine, 72, 235-262. lefebvre, h., pelchat, d., & levert, m. j. (2007). interdisciplinary family intervention program: a partnership among health professionals, traumatic brain injury patients, and caregiving relatives. journal of trauma nursing, 14, 100-113. leske, j. 1991. overview of family needs after critical illness: from assessment to intervention. aacn clinical issues, 2, 220-226. levine, c. 1998. rough crossings: family caregivers’ odysseys through the health care system. new york, ny: united hospital fund of new york. maclean, s. l., guzzetta, c. e., white, c., fontaine, d., eichorn, d. j., meyers, t. a., & desy, p. (2003). family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive procedures: practices of critical care and emergency nurses. journal of emergency nursing, 29(3), 208-221. martin-arafeh, j. m., watson, c. l., & baird, s. m. (1999). promoting family-centered care in high risk pregnancy. the journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing, 13, 27-42. tapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 17 maxwell, k. e., stuenkel, d., & saylor, c. (2007). needs of family members of critically ill patients: a comparison of nurse and family perceptions. heart & lung, 36, 367-376. may, j., ellis-hill, c., & payne, s. (2001). gatekeeping and legitimization: how informal carers’ relationship with health care workers is revealed in their everyday interactions. journal of advanced nursing, 36(3), 364-375. mcmahon-parkes, k., moule, p., benger, j., & albarran, j.w. (2009). the views and preferences of resuscitated and non-resuscitated patients towards family-witnessed resuscitation: a qualitative study. international journal of nursing studies, 46, 220-229. meert, k. l., briller, s. h., schim, s. m., & thurston, c. s. (2008). exploring parents' environmental needs at the time of a child's death in the pediatric intensive care unit. pediatric critical care medicine, 9, 623-628. miller, j. h., & stiles, a. (2009). family presence during resuscitation and invasive procedures: the nurse experience. qualitative health research, 19, 1431-1442. mitchell, m., chaboyer, w., burmeister, e., & foster, m. (2009). positive effects of a nursing intervention on family-centered care in adult critical care. american journal of critical care, 18, 543-552. moules, n. j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes – an ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods 1(3), article 1. pearsall, j., & trumble, b. (eds.). (1996). the oxford english reference dictionary (2nd ed.). oxford, uk: oxford university press. pryzby, b. j. (2005). effects of nurse caring behaviours on family stress responses in critical care. intensive and critical care nursing, 21, 16-23. tarnowski goodell, t., & harmon hanson, s. m. (1999). nurse-family interactions in adult critical care: a bowen family systems perspective. journal of family nursing, 5, 72-91. teno, j. m., casey, v. a., welch, l. c., & edgman-levitan, s. (2001). patient-focused, family-centered end-of-life medical care: views of the guidelines and bereaved family members. journal of pain and symptom management, 22, 738-751. truog, r. d., campbell, m. l., curtis, j. r., haas, c. e., luce, j. m., rubenfeld, g. d., et al. (2008). recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the american college [corrected] of critical care medicine. critical care medicine, 36, 953-963. tucker, t. l. (2002). family presence during resuscitation. critical care nursing clinics of north america, 14(2), 177-184. van horn, e. r., & kautz, d. (2007). promotion of family integrity in the acute care setting: a review of the literature. dimensions of critical care nursing, 26, 101-107. wallace, b. (1987). particulars. in the stubborn particulars of grace. toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. walsh, k. (1996). philosophical hermeneutics and the project of hans-georg gadamer: implications for nursing research. nursing inquiry, 3(4), 231-237. ward-griffin, c., bol, n., hay, k., & dashnay, i. (2003). relationships between families and registered nurses in long-term-care facilitapp & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 2 18 ties: a critical analysis. canadian journal of nursing research, 35(4), 150-174. yetman, l. (2009). caring for families: double binds in neuroscience nursing. canadian journal of neuroscience nursing, 31(1), 2229. microsoft word nielson corrected proof.docx corresponding author: cynthia r nielsen, phd university of dallas email: cynthia.nielsen@gmail.com journal of applied hermeneutics march 15, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 gadamer on the event of art, the other, and a gesture toward a gadamarian approach to free jazz cynthia r. nielsen abstract several prominent contemporary philosophers, including jürgen habermas, john caputo, and robert bernasconi, have at times painted a somewhat negative picture of gadamer as not only an uncritical traditionalist, but also as one whose philosophical project fails to appreciate difference. against such claims, i argue that gadamer’s reflections on art exhibit a genuine appreciation for alterity not unrelated to his hermeneutical approach to the other. thus, by bringing gadamer’s reflections on our experience of art into conversation with key aspects of his philosophical hermeneutics, we are able to better assess the viability of gadamer’s contributions to contemporary discussions of difference and alterity. keywords hermeneutics, hermeneutical aesthetics, aesthetics, philosophy, jazz, philosophy of music i. introduction while appreciative of gadamer’s contributions to philosophical hermeneutics and what we might call “hermeneutical aesthetics” (nicholas davey’s term), several distinguished contemporary philosophers have at times painted a somewhat negative picture of gadamer as not only an uncritical traditionalist, but also as one whose philosophical project fails to appreciate difference. for example, jürgen habermas and john caputo criticize what they see as gadamer’s oversimplified account of power relations and distorted discourses in his explanation of the formation and maintenance of traditions. caputo suggests that gadamer belongs among those philosophers nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 2 who “cannot tolerate the ambiguity of the flux.” 1 robert bernasconi argues that gadamer’s understanding of dialogue and his notion of assimilation and the fusion of horizons “have the common feature of diminishing alterity.”2 however, an examination of gadamer’s reflections on art exhibits a genuine openness to and appreciation of difference, not unrelated to his hermeneutical approach to the other. thus, by bringing gadamer’s reflections on our experience of art into conversation with key aspects of his philosophical hermeneutics, we are able to better assess the viability of gadamer’s contributions to contemporary discussions of difference and alterity. the first part of my essay (sections two through six) focuses on key concepts in gadamer’s account of art’s dynamic ontology and our experience of art. such concepts include the play structure of art, hermeneutic identity, tarrying with a work, and contemporaneity. the opening sections provide not only a discussion of these central themes, but they also (1) draw attention to the various ways in which difference and otherness are integral to gadamer’s account, and (2) utilize relevant musical examples that prepare the reader for a more focused discussion of a gadamerian approach to free jazz in section seven. by highlighting how gadamer’s understanding of art possesses a dialogical play structure, is characterized by identity and difference, requires actively engaged spectators and auditors, and is amenable to what many criticize as an unintelligible musical expression, viz. free jazz, gadamer’s project is shown as other-affirming and open to ambiguity and dynamism. that is, the essential structures and concepts characterizing gadamer’s reflections on art are likewise central to his overall hermeneutical project, and hence are not rightly described as un-attuned to difference or other-negating. rather, gadamer’s philosophical project upholds difference, since it requires a dialogical interplay between self and other that creates the possibility for a transformative experience. ii. play and the play structure of art play as a participatory structure is central to gadamer’s account of hermeneutics and the ontology and phenomenology of art. in his analyses of play in general and the play of art in particular, gadamer emphasizes the active engagement of the spectator or auditor. that is, not only do the players play the game, but also the observers actively participate in the movement or life of the game. one frequently witnesses this type of spectatorial “playing along with” in organized sports. for example, fans bring their baseball gloves in anticipation of catching a ball and in so doing intensely follow the movement of the game sometimes even diving onto the field itself. the spectator, in other words, is drawn into the spirit of the game and thus is “played by” the game just as much as the players themselves. as gadamer puts it, “the real subject of the game […] is not the player but instead the game itself. what holds the player in its spell, draws him into play, and keeps him there is the game itself.”3 1 john d. caputo, radical hermeneutics. repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project (indianapolis: indiana university press, 1987), 263. see also, jürgen habermas, “the hermeneutic claim to universality,” in the hermeneutic tradition: from ast to ricoeur, eds. gayle l. ormiston and alan d. schrift (albany: suny press, 1990), 245-72. 2 robert bernasconi, “you don’t know what i’m talking about: alterity and the hermeneutical ideal,” in the specter of relativism, ed. lawrence schmidt (evanston: northwestern university press, 1995), 178-94, here 180. 3 hans-georg gadamer, truth and method, 2nd ed., trans. and rev. joel weinsheimer and donald g. marshall (new york: continuum, 2004), 106. (hereafter, tm.) [hans-georg gadamer, hermeneutik i: nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 3 similarly in the play of art, the viewer or listener engages in a back-and-forth interplay with the work, which, in the case of art, allows the work to emerge in a communicative event. here too, the artwork draws the viewer or auditor into its movement and expects a countermovement or response. as with the game, spectatorial participation in the event of the work is not reducible to the subjective experiences of the players or audience members. rather, as davey observes, “the game analogy implies that the act of spectatorship contributes to bringing what is at play within the artwork into fuller being. the spectator just as much as the artist performs a role in realizing the subject-matters art brings into play.”4 play by nature requires an other. this other may be another human, an animal, or an object such as a ball, a child’s toy, or an imaginary object. even in the most basic expression of play, one finds a move and a countermove. this same to-and-fro movement structures our experience of art. as gadamer is fond of saying, the artwork address us; it calls out to us and expects a response. given an artwork’s complexity, we must continually return to its call, lingering with its message as we attempt to grasp its meaning(s) and allow them to impact our present understanding of our world and ourselves. thus, our very experience of art, as gadamer understands it, requires an intense listening and responding to the other’s “voice.” iii. hermeneutic identity and tarrying with the work both the play involved in art and the spectator’s active participation in it constitute essential moments of the dynamic ontology and temporality structuring art’s event. in section four, i discuss art’s temporal structure and how gadamer’s notion of contemporaneity describes art’s unique temporality in relation to the spectator’s participation and comportment. here i turn first to gadamer’s analyses of art’s dynamic ontology, paying special attention to his descriptions of hermeneutic identity and tarrying with a work. hermeneutic identity claims that the work’s identity necessarily involves difference and thus always entails openness to future possibilities, allowing for multiple presentations or enactments of the work over time.5 more specifically, for gadamer, the being of an artwork is inseparable from its various presentations, which bring out new and previously unrealized possibilities of the work. enactment or presentation is thus an essential feature of an artwork’s being. phenomenologically speaking, art exists only in presentation and performance. accordingly, art as experienced requires an ongoing “rebirth” and sustaining through both players and audience participants. the notes on the page are silent without a performer to give them life. likewise, the wahrheit und methode: grundzüge einer philosophischen hermeneutik, gesammelte werke band 1, 4. auflage (tübingen: j. c. b. mohr (paul siebeck), 2010),112. hereafter, wm.] 4 nicholas davey, unfinished worlds. hermeneutics, aesthetics and gadamer (edinburgh: edinburgh university press, 2013), 48. 5 on gadamer’s notion of “hermeneutic identity,” see donatella di cesare, gadamer: a philosophical portrait (bloomington, in: indiana university press, 2013), esp. 59–60. as di cesare explains, “[a]ny new identity that comes to light is an identity that forms itself only in difference. thus difference becomes indispensable for identity” (ibid., 60). see also, gerald l. bruns, “ancients and moderns: gadamer’s aesthetic theory and the poetry of paul celan,” in on the anarchy of poetry and philosophy. a guide for the unruly (new york: fordham university press, 2006,) 33-54, esp. 35-9. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 4 musician, painter, or sculptor creates his or her work to convey something to someone, requiring the work to be displayed or performed in a concert hall or an outdoor gathering.6 art, perhaps even more than simple play, is a communally constituted event. that hermeneutic identity is infused with difference does not mean that a performer or interpreter can simply project arbitrary meanings onto the work. doing so would be to silence the work or do violence to its integrity or structure, thereby disregarding the work’s otherness. nor does hermeneutic identity mean that interpretations or performances cannot be judged regarding their quality. in the case of a poor performance of rachmaninov’s piano concerto no. 2, opus 18, competent musicians or critics may judge the performance as presenting, albeit poorly, the structure (gebilde) of rachmaninov’s work. if there is a true engagement with the work, then every presentation relates to the work’s structure and, and gadamer puts it, must “submit itself [sich unterstellt] to the criterion [maßstab] of correctness [richtigkeit] that derives from it.”7 at the same time, the very being of the work itself is constituted by a built-in indeterminacy or openness to future possibilities enabling new dimensions of the work to emerge over time. however, that we can discern a failed presentation of a work does not imply that there is only one excellent or ideal way for the work to be manifested. on gadamer’s view, it is possible to have many correct, fitting, and even exemplary presentations, enactments, and performances of the same work. here the notion of structure should not be equated with the original composition or entity, as if the original is the ideal or standard that future performances and presentations must copy. on the contrary, future performances of a work often bring out a depth and richness not present in the original. john coltrane’s performance of the popular broadway tune, “my favorite things,” is a case in point. in coltrane’s version, the standard and rhythmically simple three-four waltz time is transformed into a polyrhythmic and densely textured six-eight (and beyond) time. in addition, coltrane adds lengthy improvisatory solos and complex harmonic textures to the original composition. in both the 1959 broadway performance and john coltrane’s, the work emerges and a common structure is discerned; yet coltrane’s performance displays a level of harmonic, melodic, and rhythmic complexity not present in the original. a. the (performed) work as reality not copy gadamer also argues that through presentation (and performance) an “increase in being” [zuwachs an sein] occurs.8 to understand his claim, one must examine his account of the complex relationship between bild and urbild. if presentation (darstellung) is the artwork’s mode of being, how does a symphonic performance or a painting present the work? for gadamer, a 6 as gadamer observes, in the play of art something comes forth that is “intended as something.” moreover, its meanings are reducible neither to mere concepts nor to some activity coordinated with a utility function. see hans-georg gadamer, “the relevance of the beautiful. art as play, symbol, and festival,” in the relevance of the beautiful and other essays, trans. nicholas walker and ed. robert bernasconi (cambridge: cambridge university press, 1986), 24. (hereafter, rb.) [gadamer, hans-georg, “die aktualität des schönen. kunst als spiel, symbol und fest,” in ästhetik und poetik i: kunst als aussage, gesammelte werke band 8. auflage. (tübingen: j. c. b. mohr (paul siebeck), 1993), 115. hereafter, gw8. 7 tm,122. [wm, 127]. 8 ibid., tm, 140. italics in original. [wm, 145]. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 5 presentation or a performance of a work is not a copy of some original or more “real” entity, being, or object. the defining task of a copy is to duplicate as accurately as possible the original. thus its essence is self-erasure or self-effacement; it points not to itself and its particularities but away from itself to what it copies. “[i]ts nature [bestimmung] is to lose its own independent existence [sein eigenes für-sich-sein aufzuheben] and serve entirely to mediate what is copied.”9 a copy’s self-effacement indicates its function as a means, not an end. its independent existence serves this very purpose of self-erasure. by contrast, a painting’s essence is neither self-erasure, nor does it function as a means to some other end. the painting points to itself and how it presents its subject matter. in other words, “one is not simply directed away from the picture [painting] to what is represented. rather, the presentation remains essentially connected to what is represented [die darstellung bleibt vielmehr mit dem dargestellten wesenhaft verbunden]— indeed belongs to it.”10 again, instead of a self-cancelling existence and purpose, the painting’s being—the painting itself—brings out something new in the subject matter that it depicts. thus the painting is more than a mere copy or reduplication of an “original” or more “true” reality; rather, the painting brings out new possibilities and new ways of seeing the “original.” thus, the original becomes more than it was; hence, its being has increased, and yet the two are integrally connected as both participate in presenting the same subject matter—yet a subject matter that itself is always in motion.11 to illustrate further, consider again coltrane’s version of “my favorite things.” coltrane’s performance is the reality or end to which we are directed. that is, his performance is not a selfeffacing copy, a sign pointing beyond itself to the original, as if the goal is merely to reduplicate the original. rather, coltrane’s version presents us with the work in a new key—that is, new possibilities of the work come forth, and we encounter dimensions of the work that did not exist previously (e.g., more complex rhythms, harmonies, improvised solos etc.). yet we identify it as a performance of “my favorite things.” coltrane never intended to merely replicate the original, but rather to enact his version of the work, which has its own independent existence while remaining connected to the original and extending, as it were, its life or being. in short, a work’s being is increased in the event of art’s unfolding over time in various enactments that bring forth new aspects of the work. so far i have established that even though the same work is repeated in each new enactment, subsequent enactments are not mere copies of an original and thus are not understood as ontologically inferior imitations. instead, gadamer’s notion of hermeneutic identity shows itself in a phenomenon of repetition in presentation that harmonizes structure and freedom. hermeneutic difference thus describes a dynamic yet discernable identity. on the one hand, hermeneutic identity is ever and always infused with difference, dynamism, and open possibilities; on the other, it indicates an identifiable structure that emerges in the communicative event of art’s appearance. as gadamer puts it, “[t]o understand [verstehende] 9 ibid., tm, 138. [wm, 143]. 10 ibid., tm, 139. [wm, 143]. 11 the discussion here pertains to non-abstract paintings in which some resemblance relationship with another object(s) can be discerned. even so, gadamer’s point is that the traditional model of art as representation does not capture the essence of what art is. in modern, abstract paintings, the notion of representation has been abandoned, and the artists themselves, as it were, “show” gadamer’s point. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 6 something, i must be able to identify it. for there was something there that i passed judgment upon and ‘understood’ [verstand].”12 stated otherwise, the work’s identity consists in its presence before me as other, in its being there as something addressing me. the work asks to be understood; it issues a challenge requiring a response.13 here again the emphasis is on the active, engaged listener or spectator: in order to experience a work of art as a communicative event, one must actively participate—one must “play along with” (mitspielen) it. 14 the listener must comport herself to the work as an other expecting something meaningful to come forth. if the viewer or listener approaches the work having already decided that it has no value and thus nothing to say, then the work will remain silent. art is a dynamic, communal event; its happening or occurrence can be thwarted or foreclosed when we comport ourselves to the other with a closed attitude. the same is true of our hermeneutical encounters with others—whether texts or human beings. b. tarrying as ecstatic participation gadamer also emphasizes the importance of tarrying or lingering with a work. to tarry or linger is to become so intentionally absorbed in a work of art that one forgets oneself. as one attunes herself to the work and becomes wholly captivated by it, she is able to see beyond her projects, concerns, and cares; she exists ec-statically, or outside herself. this ecstatic way of being should not be understood as merely passive or private; rather, as gadamer explains: being outside oneself is the positive possibility of being wholly with something else. this kind of being present [solches dabeisein] is a self-forgetfulness [selbstvergessenheit], and to be a spectator [es macht das wesen des zuschauers aus] consists in giving oneself in self-forgetfulness to what one is watching. here self-forgetfulness is anything but a private condition, for it arises from devoting one’s full attention to the matter at hand [denn sie entspringt aus der zuwendung zur sache], and this is the spectator’s own positive accomplishment [leistung].15 when one actively enters into a condition of self-forgetfulness, the occasion for the event of art to emerge in a communicative address becomes viable. as the work comes forth, it makes a lasting claim on the spectator or listener. in other words, the experience of art’s address is not a fleeting aesthetic pleasure wherein one anesthetizes oneself momentarily only to return to one’s 12 gadamer, rb, 25. [gw8, 116]. the english translation deletes the scare quotes in the german text around the word “verstand.” since gadamer placed the scare quotes in the original and likely did so to emphasize the openness and non-exhaustive character of understanding, i have included them in the english translation. 13 gadamer, rb, 26. [gw8, 116-17]. see also, daniel l. tate, “the speechless image. gadamer and the claim of modern painting,” philosophy today 45 (2001): 56-68, esp. 59-61. tate provides a helpful analysis of gadamer’s view that even the most abstract modern art manifests a “unity in tension” capable of addressing us (ibid., 60). 14 see also, bruns, “ancients and moderns,” esp. 35-6. bruns highlights the similarities between gadamer’s theory of our experience of art and our experience of play, noting the emancipatory aspects of each. in both experiences we are caught up in the self-presentation of the work or the game, and we also actively participate in the event. 15 gadamer, tm, 126. [wm, 131]. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 7 world unchanged. rather, one’s world and way of being-in-the-world-with-others is affected—at times radically so. once again, the emphasis is on an engaged, rather than detached spectator or auditor. as one intentionally and with great effort and commitment tarries (repeatedly) with the work, one experiences both a self-forgetfulness due to one’s fully being-there with the work and a selfenrichment via a world-expansion. as gadamer says, “what rends him from everything at the same time gives him back the whole of his being” [was ihn aus allem herausreißt, gibt ihm zugleich das ganze seines seins zurück.]. 16 thus the spectator’s absorbed engagement is an achievement allowing the work’s otherness to emerge.17 iv. contemporaneity and the work’s full presence and nontransparency gadamer intentionally employs the term “claim,” which søren kierkegaard developed in conjunction with his theological reflections on contemporaneity. as observed earlier, a claim is not something fleeting but enduring, enforceable, and is “concretized in a demand.”18 for example, when the gospel is preached, the hearer is presented with a claim of faith and is beckoned to respond. here the words themselves, in a way analogous to the sacraments, bring the reality of the past into the present transforming the one who receives them by altering his world and his view of others. however, the hearer of the gospel message is not merely a passive recipient. she is also challenged to translate and apply the message of salvation to her particular situation. this type of translation, application, or, as james risser puts it, “concretization of meaning that defines the present enactment,”19 is what gadamer means by the term, anwendung, which is often translated into english as “appropriation.” when gadamer claims that every interpretation is an anwendung, he draws attention to the performative (vollzug) dimension of hermeneutic experience. anwendung is thus a “form of practice”20 whereby one learns how to listen properly to voice of the other so that its claims can be brought to bear meaningfully on the present. the result is not, as caputo suggests, to consume the other,21 but to allow the other’s claims to come forth so that my world, practices, and ways of being might be enriched or challenged. gadamer’s emphasis on play, art’s address, and our being drawn in and even arrested by the work are aspects of his critique of the over-subjectivization of aesthetic consciousness; yet his critical remarks should not be interpreted as denying the subject’s experience or, as we have seen, her contribution occasioning the work’s emergence. gadamer repeatedly underscores the artwork’s ability to address the engaged participant directly. however, it appears that one can be 16 ibid., tm, 128. i have slightly modified the english translation. the italicized word indicates my modification. [wm, 133]. 17 see also, daniel l. tate, “in the fullness of time: gadamer on the temporal dimension of the work of art,” research in phenomenology 42 (2012), 92-113, esp. 104. 18 gadamer, tm, 127. [wm, 132]. 19 james risser, hermeneutics and the voice of the other. re-reading gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics (albany: state university of new york press, 1997), 103. 20 ibid., 105. see also risser’s discussion of the crucial differences between gadamer’s hermeneutical project and ricouer’s (102-5). as risser observes, gadamer, unlike ricouer, does not claim that “every interpretation is an aneignung” (103). 21 see, for example, caputo, radical hermeneutics, 115. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 8 drawn into the work in varying degrees of depth (or not drawn in at all.) that is, given its materiality, the immediacy of one’s experience of art’s sensual qualities does not require that one possess knowledge of the particular social and historical factors in which the work first emerged. yet, that person may still be drawn to the work through the “pull” of the work’s sensuous qualities (e.g., dissonant sounds, complex rhythms, a striking juxtaposition of geometric shapes and lines). gadamer’s stress on art as a communicative event and art as addressing us with meaningful content, which requires one to linger repeatedly with the work, suggests that something beyond a (subjective) experience of art’s immediacy is required. in order to respect the otherness of the work, we must take the time to learn its “language.” that is, we must enter into its world, pondering how the interplay of its symbols, sounds, colors, and gestures says something not only in its time and context but in one’s own as well. here it is helpful to mention what daniel tate describes as the artwork’s “paradoxical temporality.”22 that is, its temporality is “marked by an immediate presentness in time and at the same time by a rising above time.”23 building on tate’s notion, one might add that the work’s ability to come forth in the present and communicate meanings in different historical periods should not be equated with timelessness or a denial of art’s social and historical conditioning. artworks (and texts) are historically shaped; they arise, participate in, and belong to various traditions.24 yet great works of art have the ability to draw us in, to captivate us by their sensuous elements— but sensuous elements arranged meaningfully in languages of sound and symbols, which are themselves communally shaped via artistic, social, and other practices and traditions. what i have outlined above suggests a movement beyond erlebnis and to erfahrung. since both words are translated into english as “experience,” the difference between the two is lost. erlebnis is associated with wilhelm dilthey and “emphasizes the distinctness and singularity of the perceived moment.” in contrast, gadamer is concerned with erfahrung, which “emphasizes the cumulative and formative character of experience, as when one speaks of an ‘experienced’ artist or musician.”25 erlebnis highlights the intensity of the present moment and is concerned not with the work’s meaning but with its sensual qualities and sophistications. erfahrung stresses the unfolding, cumulative, and unfinished character of experience; moreover, erfahrung “implies an involvement in the meaning and significance of what is experienced.”26 hence, for gadamer, our experience (erfahrung) of art is something more than an intense, momentary subjective experience (erlebnis); yet, our subjective experience plays an important role in drawing us deeper into art’s communicative address. 22 tate, “in the fullness of time,” 99. 23 hans-georg gadamer, “the artwork in word and image: ‘so true, so full of being!’” in the gadamer reader. a bouquet of the later writings, trans. and ed. richard e. palmer, 192-224 (evanston, il: northwestern university press, 2007), 196. 24 for an instructive explication of gadamer’s understanding of tradition as “an event of repetitive disclosure,” (81) see risser, hermeneutics and the voice of the other, esp. 65-81. in chapter two, risser engages caputo’s (and to a certain degree habermas’) concerns regarding gadamer’s alleged conservatism and backward-looking orientation. 25 davey, unfinished worlds, 70. 26 ibid. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 9 as we have seen, gadamer stresses what he calls the “absolute presentness” of the work that is, the artwork’s ability “to build bridges that reach beyond the enclosure and space in which it originated.”27 i have suggested that this is in part due to the work’s immediacy, its ability to draw us in via its materiality and sensual qualities. however, this is a structured materiality; the work’s sounds and colors are artfully arranged. its structure has a discernable movement that can be perceived even if its meaning(s) remain in many ways opaque and enigmatic. here it may be helpful to consider how achievement relates to contemporaneity. as gadamer explains, contemporaneity means that when a particular work of art presents itself to me, it “achieves full presence [volle gegenwart], however remote its origin may be. thus contemporaneity [gleichzeitigkeit] is not a mode of givenness in consciousness [eine gegebenheitsweise im bewußtsein], but a task [eine aufgabe] for consciousness and an achievement [eine leistung] that is demanded [verlangt wird] of it.”28 thus understood, contemporaneity is not a given, but instead something that the spectator or auditor must in some sense actively bring about. this suggests that the coproductive, participatory activity of the spectator, listener, or interpreter is necessary for the work’s coming-into-presence. the spectator’s or auditor’s achievement of making a past reality present here and now marks the distinctive temporality of contemporaneity. historical distance is not a barrier to the work’s meaningful address; what comes to presence through spectatorial, auditorial, and performative cooperative activity can be re-contextualized and repeated over time. here the event of art—its happening via active participatory engagement—points both to its hermeneutical identity (i.e., identity and difference) and dynamic ontology. the artwork is not a static object whose meaning remains the same; rather, as new performances and interpretations emerge, new (multiple) horizons are fused among the work and its performances and audience members. as is the case in a genuine dialogue among persons, the work as other can challenge and (re)shape one’s horizon. likewise, a community of performers (e.g., musicians) can creatively (yet non-violently) expand the work as they bring out new possibilities over time. still, whatever meanings emerge in art’s event, those meanings are always socially and historically conditioned by communal practices, traditions, and shared discourses. before closing this section, it is important to clarify what gadamer means when he speaks of a work’s “full” or “absolute” presence. although the language is somewhat misleading, he does not mean that when the work is “fully present,” every aspect of the work in that particular encounter is transparent or exhaustively understood. in yo-yo ma’s masterful performances of bach’s cellos suites, the works are fully present for him as performer and for the attuned listener; nonetheless something new and unexpected emerges in each performance. in this sense, the reality of the work is fully present in its various presentations and performances; however, its being is not exhaustively grasped in one’s experience of and participation in it here and now. in other words, the work’s “absolute presentness” and one’s being present with the work can (and does) readily coexist with the notion of an ongoing interplay of hiddenness and manifestation or, in heideggarian terms, concealment and unconcealment. that something is genuinely or fully present does not mean that one can or will ever grasp all that it is; one’s encounter with the reality of its presence might in fact be too much to take in. in such a situation, both participants are fully “there,” as the event of art unfolds. however, it is often the case that the work qua other 27 gadamer, “the artwork in word and image,” 199. 28 gadamer, tm, 127. [wm, 132]. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 10 speaks meaningfully without one comprehending its totality.29 in short, gadamer’s understanding of art and our experience of art’s alterity not only permit but also expect and affirm the work’s enigmatic dimensions. v. art as dialogical interplay in order to bring together several strands of my argument, i turn to discuss our experience of art as a form of dialogical interplay that requires letting the other’s voice—whether dissonant, consonant, or disorienting—sound. as noted previously, the structure of the work manifests an integrity and autonomy—an otherness—that resists my attempts to force arbitrary meanings upon it. such a move would amount to remaking the work in my own image and thus silencing the other’s voice. to interact with it in this way is to do violence to the work and would amount to a monologue rather than a dialogue. for gadamer, a proper (hermeneutical) aesthetic experience with a painting or a musical work is dialogical, and thus by definition requires the other’s voice to sound in and against my own (dynamic) horizon so that my way of seeing the world might be challenged or expanded. as i linger with the work and open myself to its address, what formerly appeared strange may become more intelligible, remain enigmatic, or be a combination of both. nonetheless, as i abide with the work and allow it to come forth, it addresses me in a communicative event that requires my participation and response. hence, to mute the other’s voice would result both in a failed hermeneutic and aesthetic experience. stated otherwise, gadamer’s notion of an event-ful experience of art, poetry, and the like expects and even invites dissonances both to sound and to remain. as noted previously, one need not conclude that a genuine encounter with art requires exhaustive understanding without remainder. here a musical insight proves helpful. harmony itself—especially the complex or extended harmonies of jazz and 20th century music—requires the differences of the notes to sound in their fullness. to eradicate or remove dissonance (i.e., difference) from musical works would render them dull and monotonous. analogously, an authentic or harmonious hermeneutic or aesthetic encounter demands neither that the other become fully transparent nor be reduced to my unison voice. vi. gadamer’s openness to modern art and a coda on tradition when it comes to modern art, gadamer is aware that many artists repudiate or seek to redefine traditional accounts of beauty, form, and proportionality. it is precisely here that gadamer’s position proves particularly insightful in its ability to listen to the voice of the other and thereby to move us beyond traditional understandings of art’s ontology. for example, toward the end of his introductory remarks in his essay, “the relevance of the beautiful,” gadamer poses a series of questions expressing a genuine interest in taking seriously the works of modern artists. 29 perhaps this is something akin to jean-luc marion’s idea of the bedazzling event of the saturated phenomenon. see, for example, jean-luc marion, being given. being given. toward a phenomenology of givenness, 1st ed., trans. jeffrey kosky (stanford: stanford university press, 2002), esp. 199-247. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 11 how can we understand the innovative forms of modern art as they play around with the content so that our expectations are constantly frustrated? […] how are we to understand what duchamp is doing when he suddenly exhibits some everyday object on its own and thereby produces a sort of aesthetic shock reaction? we cannot simply dismiss this as so much nonsense, for duchamp actually revealed something about the conditions of aesthetic experience.30 here gadamer exhibits a genuine openness to artists such as duchamp, whose works are meant, among other things, to provoke and challenge our thinking about what art is and how our experience of art is conditioned by social, historical, and other communal practices. for gadamer, our experience of art is not chiefly about our subjective responses to artworks (although our subjective responses do play a role in our experience). nor is the goal to try and uncover the artist’s intentions or to teach us the proper way to interpret what particular works mean. rather, his aim, from a hermeneutic point of view, is to analyze the conditions or structures of our experience of art in order to clarify “how aesthetic experience is both involved in something larger than itself and reflects (speculum) that larger actuality within itself.”31 thus, one’s meaningful encounter with an artwork always has a “backstory,” and gadamer’s interest lies in understanding what informs, shapes, and conditions that encounter. one aspect of that conditioning is the fact that we belong to multiple traditions linguistic, sociopolitical, aesthetic, etc. prior to my discussion of a gadamerian approach to free jazz (and relevant to that discussion), i want to speak briefly about gadamer’s notion of tradition. that we are situated within and shaped by traditions does not mean that we are unable to oppose, challenge, or alter them and the practices and norms they embody. as complex, socially constructed human artifacts, traditions exhibit a dynamic stability: they can and do congeal for certain periods of time and thus manifest a staying power, yet they are not rigidly fixed. instead, they change over time as new infusions from other voices expand and alter what in an earlier phase were standard practices and established norms. in the following consideration of free jazz, i discuss specific ways in which this process of transforming musical traditions and practices occurred in the transition from bebop and hard bop to free jazz. here i mention briefly one element of tradition-transformation: namely, the creative application of other musical voices whether voices of past, or present musicians in one’s own tradition, or voices of those outside it. jazz luminaries such as miles davis, charlie parker, and john coltrane creatively applied musical insights from earlier jazz masters, 20th century classical music, and afro-cuban and indian music in order to go beyond (trans-gress) jazz norms and develop new practices and musical styles. their creative uses (anwendungen) of others’ voices are not understood as violent or consuming acts. on the contrary, they communicate a profound respect for the others’ achievements and contributions to the tradition(s). thus, by dwelling with the (musical) other in order to learn the other’s language and style—imitating it and yet creating something new—the other’s voice continues to sound into the future, acting as an ongoing tribute to the other’s greatness while also expanding the tradition beyond its previous limits. as gadamer 30 gadamer, rb, 22. [gw8, 113]. 31 davey, unfinished worlds, 47. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 12 himself explains, “tradition means transmission rather than conservation. this transmission does not imply that we simply leave things unchanged and merely conserve them. it means learning how to grasp and express the past anew. it is in this sense that we can say that transmission is equivalent to translation.”32 vii. a gadamerian approach to free jazz we have seen that a key feature of our aesthetic experience is the spectator’s or listener’s active participation. also significant are gadamer’s understanding of art as an event, tarrying with a work, the play-character of art, art’s communal dimensions, and the primacy of art’s address. in the following paragraphs, i highlight how these fundamental aspects of gadamer’s account apply to free jazz. i conclude that a gadamerian approach to free jazz not only allows but requires the voice of the other to sound in its alterity; consequently, gadamer’s hermeneutical aesthetics demonstrates an openness to the other that creates the possibility for selfand world-questioning and even a transformation of one’s way of seeing the world. free jazz, also called the “new thing,” burst forth on the jazz music scene in the late fifties and is frequently associated with names such as john coltrane, ornette coleman, and cecil taylor. an adequate definition of free jazz is notoriously difficult, as each group or musician now recognized as a pioneer or exemplar of free jazz instantiates diverse expressions of the genre. even so, ekkehard jost highlights a “point of agreement” among free jazz groups: namely, they sought to subvert signature practices and norms of traditional jazz that carried over into bebop and hard bop.33 in particular, free jazz musicians were unsatisfied with the constraints of the harmonic, metric, and structural norms that constituted jazz up to hard bop. although the harmonic elements of bebop and hard bop had become increasingly complex compared to earlier expressions of jazz, the structures of standard jazz pieces had become rigid and formalized. as jost explains, in traditional jazz the main purpose of the melody or theme is to establish the harmonic and structural framework for improvised solos. however, “[i]n free jazz, which does not observe fixed patterns of bars or functional harmony, this purpose no longer exists.”34 thus both the form and content of free jazz pieces are highly specific, consisting neither in typical jazz harmonic sequences (ii-v-i, etc.) nor in common structural frameworks (e.g., the aaba form). as a consequence, one cannot continue to recycle standard chord changes and simply write a new melody, which was a common practice until the new thing began to challenge these accepted jazz norms. even within the very same free jazz composition, the form itself can continually morph, as bar lines are porous and allow for new melodic, rhythmic, harmonic, and interactive motifs to develop. given this freedom from functional harmony and rigidified forms, “the members of a group are forced to listen to each other with intensified concentration.”35 another aspect of certain expressions of free jazz is collective or group improvisation. when group improvisation becomes central, the motivic development of the piece is in constant flux as each player responds to and builds upon the work’s ever-changing rhythmic, melodic, and harmonic elements. this creates a dynamic composition in which collective conversation is 32 gadamer, rb, 49 [gw8, 139]. 33 ekkehard jost, free jazz (new york: de capo press, 1994), 9. 34 ibid.,153. 35 ibid., 23. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 13 foregrounded rather than traditional jazz’s emphasis on a single soloist improvising over relatively stable chord-changes. moreover, as is the case with works such as ornette coleman’s “sound gravitation” and “falling stars,” numerous free jazz pieces contain no traditional melody or theme.36 rather, the works are “compositions in sound that grow from the spontaneous interaction of [the] musicians.”37 as one can imagine, such sonic “happenings” are risky and require not only intense, responsive listening among the players, but also high levels of trust, openness, and vulnerability.38 even when one does not fully understand what another member plays, one must listen and respond to the other, anticipating and trusting that s/he has something valuable to say and worth the effort to puzzle through. here one might highlight an ethical dimension involved in collective improvisation: namely, the trust and vulnerability required among the improvisers is not unlike gadamer’s emphasis on the need for openness to the other in order for a genuine dialogical engagement to succeed. after all, gadamer’s notion of openness implies not only that one listen attentively and expectantly to the other, but also that one approaches the other with respect and trust.39 given that one’s presumptions may be exposed as inadequate, misguided, or may even be radically challenged, entering a gadamerian dialogue requires vulnerability and a willingness to take risks. in addition to internal developments within the musical practices themselves, socio-political factors played a role in shaping the music. as many commentators and jazz historians have documented, jazz musicians in america were subject to racialized laws, customs, and practices both in society at large as well as in the more narrow confines of the music industry.40 such practices affected not only the musicians’ personal and communal lives but also the music itself. white club owners were by and large apathetic to aesthetic concerns. driven by profit motives and operating on the basis of stereotypes of black musicians as mere “entertainers” rather than serious artists, they set up obstacles that free jazz musicians had to overcome in order to develop their music. for instance, in order to maximize alcohol sales, club owners frequently demanded three short performances with small breaks in between.41 such pre-set time frames, calculated for monetary benefits rather than artistic exploration, were ill-suited for the dynamic and open character of the new thing. as noted earlier, free jazz musicians created pieces that neither conformed to the common time frames for a work nor to traditional formal structures—much less to predetermined sets established by club owners. hence, in order to pursue their aesthetic aims, the musicians created the loft movement and performed their music in large loft apartments 36 with no discernable melody to serve as a “grounding point,” rhythmic and sonic textures and densities are foregrounded and in a sense become “thematic,” similar to the way that in a kandinsky painting, line, point, and color are thematized. 37 jost, free jazz, 64. 38 see also bruce ellis benson’s discussion the vulnerability and risk required in musical dialogue in the improvisation of musical dialogue. a phenomenology of music (cambridge: cambridge university press, 2003), 168. 39 for a detailed discussion of the ethical dimensions of gadamer’s hermeneutics, see monica vilhauer, gadamer’s ethics of play. hermeneutics and the other (new york: lexington books, 2010), chapter 5. see also, benson, the improvisation of musical dialogue, chapter 5. 40 see, for example, eric lott, “double v, double-time: bebop’s politics of style,” callaloo, 36 (1988): 597-605, ingrid monson, freedom sounds. civil rights call out to jazz and africa (oxford: oxford university press, 2007), and ekkehard jost, free jazz (new york: de capo press, 1994). 41 john d. baskerville, “free jazz: a reflection of black power ideology,” journal of black studies 24 (1994): 484-497, here 488. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 14 within their own local communities.42 in such a setting, jazz artists could develop their music and let it to carry them for as long as the group collectively agreed. acknowledging music’s socio-political conditioning is consonant with a gadamerian approach to art, as gadamer’s understanding of our historical conditioning, our belonging to various traditions, and our thrownness can be readily applied to the history of american jazz in its multiple expressions. gadamer, no doubt, recognizes how cultural and sociopolitical narratives shape both a societies’ conception of art and its function, as well as how an artist views his or her role in relation to the society.43 these aspects are an important part of the work’s being and meaning, both of which always exceed what is presented or performed at any given time and change with every performance and enactment. art’s dynamic nature and ongoing movement of revealing and concealing go hand in hand with an excess of meaning. davey sums this up nicely with his hermeneutical axiom x = x+, which emphasizes that “words, symbols and images all point beyond themselves. all mean more than initial acquaintance suggests.”44 for example, when a musical work (x) presents itself to an engaged participant, the work also discloses the broader horizons of meaning or speculative fields (x+), which constitute it and give it its significance. the part (x) discloses the whole (x+) but only partially, as the whole (x+) can never be fully captured in images or concepts. as is the case with any dialogical encounter, one must approach the other with a spirit of openness. here free jazz (along with other expressions of modern art) often proves challenging. for example, the intense and often harsh sonic textures and rhythmic densities of free jazz may draw a listener in or repel and frustrate her. the complexity of free jazz, its trans-gressive character, and heightened alterity, places significant demands on the listener, requiring her to spend time with the work in order to learn its “language.” thus, a genuine encounter with free jazz precludes casual listening. one doesn’t listen to free jazz as a way to escape from the mundane, nor does free jazz work well as background or “atmosphere” music. free jazz demands intentional engagement; it asserts itself as a singular, unrepeatable other that simultaneously invites and eludes understanding. gadamer’s hermeneutical aesthetics not only expects but also welcomes interpretative tensions and ambiguities. modern art’s complex alterity requires the listener to slow down, to dwell with the work, and to readjust his or her expectations. we must be fully there with a work in order for any understanding to occur. given our sound-byte world, replete with iphone distractions and interruptions, modern art’s demand for intentional involvement serves as a reminder of what genuine dialogue requires. likewise, the uniqueness of free jazz—its rejection of standard harmonic structures and musical forms—speaks against what gadamer calls the “rule of number” so characteristic of modern life. “the rule of number is visible everywhere and manifests itself above all in the form of the series, aggregate, addition and sequence. […] it is the exchangeability of parts which typifies the sum and series. the fact that an individual part can be exchanged and replaced is an essential component of the kind of life we lead.”45 a free jazz improvisation is a unique event whose very nature resists the “rule of number.” as such it speaks against a consumer culture where objects are mass produced and easily replaced. one does not consume free jazz; one participates in its non-repeatable event. 42 ibid., 489. 43 see, for example, rb, 6–7 [gw8, 97-8]. 44 davey, unfinished worlds, 6. 45 gadamer, rb, 89. [gw8, 321]. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 15 vii. conclusion gadamer understands the artwork not as a static object to be analyzed, but rather as an event in which one actively participates. the work’s dynamic ontology can also be described in terms of its hermeneutic identity, which is always identity constituted by difference. as a communicative event, the artwork has the capacity to speak. that is, the work is an other, whose communally constituted “language” of symbols and sounds, can and does speak meaningfully to those willing to learn its language and hear its address. yet as with any dialogical encounter, a genuine engagement with an artwork results in both clarity and opacity. gadamer’s hermeneutical aesthetics assumes and embraces interpretive tensions; art’s truth is not only a play of revealing and concealing, but it also resists a reductionist propositional “capture” as well as hermeneutical closure. furthermore, participation in art’s event demands an openness and willingness to listen to the work qua other. this comportment can be understood as an ethical commitment, wherein one resolves to be “fully there” with the work even when its language is frustrating and difficult to understand. such attentive dwelling allows the work to come forth, revealing certain aspects and simultaneously concealing others. that is, as one intentionally enters into a back-and-forth play with the work, one comes to understand its message but never with a sense of finality, as if everything has been grasped and no additional meanings could ever surface. given our finitude and the work’s dynamic ontology, this incomplete yet genuine experience of an artwork’s varied meanings and unfinished character is to be expected. here our hermeneutical condition mirrors our human condition. just as one’s self-understanding unfolds over time and in conversation with others, but never reaches final clarity, so too one’s understanding of the work is always incomplete. that our dialogical encounters with others will also be of a both/and, dialectical, and unfolding character is fully compatible with gadamer’s hermeneutical project. on the one hand, when a genuine dialogue occurs, one comes to understand the subject matter better, which is not to say that one must agree with the other. a successful dialogical encounter with a text or a work of art neither requires agreement about nor a complete grasp of the subject matter. as one repeatedly contemplates works over the course of a lifetime, new insights emerge; one comes to see the work, oneself, and the world differently. nonetheless, no single interpretation, nor a combination of interpretations, will ever exhaust the work’s meaning. contra gadamer’s critics, difference is not primarily a problem to solve or overcome. both difference and sameness are equiprimordial. although gadamer does not thematize exploitative and oppressive social relations in which true dialogue is prevented and the goal is simply to eradicate difference, his philosophical project is in no way fundamentally hostile to difference.46 on the contrary, as i have argued, gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics and hermeneutical aesthetics embrace difference and otherness. in its ideal gadamerian expression, one might say that difference dances with sameness in an ongoing interplay where neither takes the lead, but 46 in his discussion of gadamer’s notion of “fusion of horizons,” bernasconi discerns a diminishment and even antagonism to difference. see, for example, bernasconi, “you don’t know what i’m talking about,” 187. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 16 each tarries together in a community where moves and countermoves are reciprocally recognized, valued, and harmonized in the truest sense. references baskerville, j.d. (1994). free jazz: a reflection of black power ideology. journal of black studies, 24, 484-497. benson, b.e. (2003). the improvisation of musical dialogue: a phenomenology of music. cambridge, ma: cambridge university press. bernasconi, r. (1995). you don’t know what i’m talking about: alterity and the hermeneutical ideal. in l. schmidt (ed.), the specter of relativism, pp. 178-194. evanston, il: northwestern university press. bruns, g.l. (2006). ancients and moderns: gadamer’s aesthetic theory and the poetry of paul celan. in on the anarchy of poetry and philosophy. a guide for the unruly, pp. 33-54. new york, ny: fordham university press. caputo, j.d. (1987). radical hermeneutics. repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. indianapolis, in: indiana university press. davey, n. (2013). unfinished worlds. hermeneutics, aesthetics and gadamer. edinburgh, scotland: edinburgh university press. di cesare, d. (2013). gadamer: a philosophical portrait. bloomington, in: indiana university press. gadamer, h-g. (2007). the artwork in word and image: “so true, so full of being!” in r.e. palmer (ed & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings, pp. 192-224. evanston, il: northwestern university press. gadamer, h-g. (1986). the relevance of the beautiful: art as play, symbol, and festival. in r. bernasconi (ed., n.walker, trans), the relevance of the beautiful and other essays, pp. 3-53. cambridge, ma: cambridge university press. gadamer, h-g. (1993). die aktualität des schönen: kunst als spiel, symbol und fest. in ästhetik und poetik i: kunst als aussage, gesammelte werke band 8. auflage, pp. 94-142. tübingen, germany: j.c.b. mohr (paul siebeck). gadamer, h-g. (1960/2004). truth and method (2nd ed., j. weinsheimer and d. g. marshall, trans & rev.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (1960/2010). hermeneutik i: wahrheit und methode: grundzüge einer philosophischen hermeneutik, gesammelte werke band 1, 4. auflage. tübingen, germany: j.c.b. mohr (paul siebeck). nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 17 habermas, j. (1990). the hermeneutic claim to universality. in g.l. ormiston & a.d. schrift (eds.), the hermeneutic tradition: from ast to ricoeur, pp. 245-272. albany, ny: suny. jost, e. (1994). free jazz. new york, ny: de capo press. lott, e. (1988). double v, double-time: bebop’s politics of style. callaloo, 36, 597-605. marion, j-l. (2002). being given: toward a phenomenology of givenness (1st ed., j. kosky, trans.). stanford, ca: stanford university press. monson, i. (2007). freedom sounds: civil rights call out to jazz and africa. oxford, uk: oxford university press. risser, j. (1997). hermeneutics and the voice of the other. re-reading gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: state university of new york press. tate, d.l. (2012). in the fullness of time: gadamer on the temporal dimension of the work of art. research in phenomenology, 42, 92-113. tate, d.l. (2001). the speechless image. gadamer and the claim of modern painting. philosophy today, 45, 56-68. vilhauer, m. (2010). gadamer’s ethics of play: hermeneutics and the other. new york, ny: lexington books. microsoft word jardine corrected proof (2).docx corresponding author: david w. jardine professor emeritus, university of calgary email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics november 15, 2018 ãthe author(s) 2018 “to be dying under their wings is a weird miracle” david w. jardine abstract in this paper, the author responds to the moules and estefan (2018) editorial “watching my mother die: subjectivity and the other side of dementia” with a hermeneutic interpretation of memory, remembering, forgetting, grief, and subjectivity. keywords hermeneutics, gadamer, grief, memory, subjectivity, ecology as in spinning a thread, we twist fibre on fibre. and the strength of the thread does not reside in the fact that some one fibre runs through its whole length, but in the overlapping of many fibres. don't say “there must be something common”. . .but look and see whether there is anything common to all. for if you look at them you will not see something that is common to all, but similarities, relationships, and a whole series of them at that. to repeat: don't think but look! we see a complicated network of similarities, overlapping and criss-crossing: sometimes overall similarities, sometimes similarities of detail. i can think of no better expression to characterize these similarities than “family resemblances.” (familienahnlichkeiten). ludwig wittgenstein, from philosophical investigations (1968, p. 32) thelma’s other side jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 12 2 i only met thelma moules once, on exactly the same day that the sunflowers appeared and housed themselves in my memory (jardine, 2018a), a vivid day, strangely more so now than then, as per the exacting vagaries of memory. this image cluster buffed and come to shine with attention. it seems, once again as before, that it must have coalesced of its own accord into something that could be tucked away in a recess and called up, now, reading “watching my mother die -subjectivity and the other side of dementia” (moules & estefan, 2018). to be honest, i only barely recall thelma’s face. i’d even forgotten her name but recognized it right away whilst reading. thelma. a great old-as-the-hills name, that, as is the phrase “old as the hills.” of that meeting day i mostly remember her even-then thinning hair and the brightness of the shine of her skull’s skin amidst the sparse stalks of sun and sparkle of light. reading nancy’s words, the very first thing that jumped up was that grief is always someone’s. general concepts, expressions, ideas, theories, descriptions, themes, necessarily leave out one of its primal features -its closeness, its rattling immediacy up and down the spine, in and out the inand out-breaths, its being mine and no one else’s in a way that is not diminished no matter how much i share, how much i write or tell the tale or hug or weep. it does not exhaust even when it seems it has. but it does round back in memory apses, naves and niches, tucks and folds, images, glimpses and nods. it composes itself and thereby composes me and thereby decomposes, slowly, only to be shred open again at the whiff of something that reminds. dying and its reaches are long-lived, even in forgetting. i am not a subject but all this doesn’t make my experiences subjective, because i am not a subject. me being cast as a subject is an existential cast-off of the very objectivism that hermeneutics is also not especially interested in kowtowing to, contesting, or vying for or against. i am not a subject. i am one of us, one of your kin nancy, andrew, john, thelma. i grieve right out in the full, dark sun of the world and even my experience of isolation and loneliness in grief is long-since understood as one of our lots in life, one we share variously, in weird and familiar ways, proximally, and at a distance. even in the intimate moment that i feel that it is mine to suffer alone, this feeling is confirmed by paging through picasso’s blue period, or through speeding past a deer carcass at the side of the highway and see the ravens cackily, joyously gathering, feasting. these multifarious voices, stories, glimpses, images, don’t replace one another but cumulate, with each added tale rattling spinning like fiber on fiber, making it new and old at the same time. thelma irene moules. reta lenore jardine becomes weirdly legible again having been long since forgotten. “only in the multifariousness of voices does [‘my experience’] exist” ( gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 284). it is not an inner state once you exhale. and hermeneutics suggests that perhaps you should, exhale that is. speak. write. these are ways to not only “make memory last” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 391) but to let my own experiences be borne up where they belong, in the familienahnlichkeiten of the earth’s fabrics and tugs and pulls. like air under wings. and even if i pull back “inwards,” this interior is familiar territory. i am not alone in my lone. this is an ecological truth. subjectivity, borne as a buttress against the vagaries and irrationalities of the early 20th century, hides the fact that, in its retreats, it affirms precisely that which sent us, full of jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 12 3 anxiety and dread, scurrying into ourselves, forgetting that these very selves that seemed a refuge against those vagaries were, to a hidden degree, the invention of that from which we retreated. this is why stories must be allowed to speak out, why they must be placed in broad and abundant fields of living relations and not be caught back in the captures of retreat. grieve out loud. otherwise, it is an ecological, not just personal, disaster. the past is turning out to be different than it was i get it. all this seems contradictory. get over it. one can’t rescue the life-world from its multifarious contradictoriness by trying to portion off the varieties of its ways into the “moist gastric intimac[ies]” (sartre, 1970, p. 4) of various subjects. the contra, in the life-world’s contradictoriness, is not just in and between the dictions underneath or behind which there is a noncontradictory world. the life-world itself is full of contradictions, occlusions, variegations, mixed blood, unclear turns, upheavals, impenetrable mysteries and revelations that come and go, rise and fall, emerge and perish. we all know this. it does not follow the logic of identity and difference, of “it is” or “it isn’t.” it is woven, instead, in an ecologic of interrelatedness, of textus, weave and catch-a-thread unravelling and weave again. the one new thread suddenly makes the ones that have become old and familiar different than they used to be. the past, as nancy’s writing hints, is turning out to be different than it was. even finished events are unfinished, just like picasso’s work did not simply add itself to a list of art history but changed how we might understand that history. precedents, exemplars, turn out to be some different than they used to be. nancy moules was not born as just one more in a line of blood but renders that line re-spun. john and thelma turn out to be something different that they were, and they will again, even in this wee way of having their names mentioned in writing, their names read in reading. i’ve turned out differently because of them and her. we are not subjects simply subjected to this. we are earth beings who are in this weird way. the summer after i wrote about john moules death and recalled those monstrous sunflowers at his house (jardine, 2018a), my own back garden got inundated by sunflower-volunteers grown from the happenstance scattershots of bird seed over the winter. and nancy and i are caught to wonder what it means. and it doesn’t mean anything. and yet it does. we are both weavers and woven, and which is which is which is always “yet-to-be-decided” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 119), again, again. the job of hermeneutics and an old biblical matter the job of hermeneutics is not to step in and stop this process. it is not bent on straightening this out or solve this puzzle, but to puzzle over it and gather us together around our bespoken kin, nancy, here, and thelma, and john at a greater distance, but nearer because of it. and ravens, too, and sunflowers each lean in to listen to the gathering. this is why hermeneutic work needs to use language that fails in the task to name its topic once and for all, not because of a desire to be vague or “poetic,” but because such halty, stumbly, gooey, etchy, sly and hinty words bespeak the tremble of how lived experience is lived, what lived experience is. it’s the old mensuratio ad rem thing again. objectivity is too dumb-ass a thing to ask of living, and subjectivity, its modern consort, also fails the test of adaequatio. objectivity and subjectivity are equally/oppositely inadequate to lived experience. this is the great value of andrew estefan’s part of “watching my mother die -subjectivity and the other jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 12 4 side of dementia.” it takes great detail and careful study to see through these inheritances we too easily presume. to take what seems to be a given, what seems to be something obvious, and to “make the object” -in this case, “subjectivity” -“and all its possibilities fluid” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 367) is part of the “skilled art of questioning” (p. 367) that is vital to hermeneutic insight. the tough task of hermeneutic work is that, in order to be understood and communicated and commiserated-over, lived experiences are not to be tossed, shall we say, “upward” into a regnant idea or generality or theme or pattern and then fetched down by others to apply to their situation too, or in order to adjust the soaring idea so as to better ensure its flight. grief shall not be lifted up. it graves. so even when “what is fixed in writing has detached itself from the contingency of its origin and its author and made itself free for new relationships” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 395), these new relations are now drawn into the orbit of this contingency through a recognition of the contingency of their own living and the slap-back echo urged in the arches of air and sun. understanding, here and therefore, is always, shall we say, a lateral pass, a toss of likeness, of verisimilitude (gadamer, 1960/1989, pp. 20-21), analogy, allegory, metaphor, interruption, startle, familiarity and the strange be-wariness that familiarity makes possible. this is like that but -tricked you! -no it’s not. this brushes up against an old biblical matter that i wished i had discussed with john moules. it is the non-monotheistic, hermeneutic logic of a non-believer, of one who, instead, finds everywhere the experience of “breaking open” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 362) into relations of dependent co-arising. there is not one true incarnation of the eidos, no one true word that is sovereign over all that it governs, that is the perfection, the essence (or, more softly put as per “interpretive research,” the theme) of that which it names. instead, there are multiple incarnations, each of which are suggestive, not of the one true logos of which they are the variegated incarnations but instead, of each other. we live our lives akin. each suggests all the others, laterally and each “stubborn particular” (wallace, 1989) is thus “whole” without each needing to be being redeemed by some univocal singularity which arches over all and in which, to use the platonic image, each “participates” in relations of proximity and distance. “a special effort of memory” now the trouble with this is at least double. first, the receiver of such a lateral pass --the reader of a hermeneutic piece -must engage in a precarious, deeply risky calling up and: running up and down the known range of cases to which [the topic being discussed] applies, by actually calling up the spectrum of different exemplifications and then catching the point. (norris-clarke, p. 67) that work of “the spontaneous and inventive seeking out of similarities” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 432) is what hermeneutics names as the “basis of the life of language” (p. 432). here is where the counterpoint of “objectivity” resides: it requires a special effort of memory to recall that, alongside the scientific ideal of unambiguous designation, th[is spontaneous and inventive seeking out of family resemblances constitutes the] life of language itself [and] continues unchanged. (gadamer, 1960/1989, pp. 433-434) jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 12 5 the topic must be allowed to “to expand to its full analogous breadth of illuminative meaning” (norris-clarke, 1976, p. 72). that, by itself, is tough work enough and it points to how, in order adequately be myself, i must read, i must study the vagaries in all the forms i can muster. and here is the rub. read well if it is well-written, my own living will find itself at stake, summoned up to bear witness, to sing, to lament. to understand. to write this. having to be not remembered understanding is the expression of the affinity of the one who understands to the one whom he understands and to that which he understands. (gadamer, 1983, p. 48). from old french afinite, “relationship, kinship; neighbourhood, vicinity.” (on-line etymological dictionary) i can't stop thinking about the intertwining of two things. first, losing the memory of one’s loves -that weird and seemingly inevitable time-fade, where the voice cadence can’t quite be recalled, where the old photo startles with something lost to the wear of living, where a small, forgotten object hides unbeknownst and unexpectedly triggers memory. second, remembering how one’s loved one lost their memory. lost their memory of me. my own mother drifted off into a playful spot, with a clutched teddy bear, and when my son visited her in her final days, she thought he was perhaps me? perhaps just back from world war ii, from overseas? and her husband (actually long-dead) was off getting the bags out of the car for vacation and the lovely restaurant they have here, where you can eat for free! lucky me and her and us to have it happen that way. but nancy writes, and i read. it’s not just losing a parent but having to live with the fact that they lost you in their waning days and then died. they take something of you with them in any case. but to take the memory of you ahead of time is a tough matter -to be unremembered, to somehow disappear, right before the eyes of your parent. in alzheimer’s, it is as if i have died, as if i had never lived, right in front of their eyes, even though, well, here i am. to be alive to witness my own death in the eyes of a loved one is a strange, strange thing. to be able to write about it, to be able to have that writing read, is an old cluster of our deeply human arts of living and dying. when her mother died, nancy was no longer having to live with being not remembered. what an utterly weird relief, eh? same as with my own mother, whose traverse into final reverie was far sweeter than most. for reta, it became a family resemblance mix-up and mash-up and she was not frightened or angry. just lucky happenstance, that. it wasn’t like i wasn’t remembered. it was like i was part of the mix up. freeing, in its own ambiguous way. an ecological aside regarding memory and place-value jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 12 6 another happenstance drifted by in the orbit of “watching my mother die -subjectivity and the other side of dementia.” i haven’t worked it out adequately, yet, but it is the closest i’ve come to glimpsing this land. just a broken-up sketch, then: . . . this very same sort of memory/forgetting . . . driving into south calgary on saturday along hwy. 22 . . . all the construction, with many of the old, familiar signposts and figures and trees and fields torn up. . . had the feeling, not simply that i didn't quite know where i was, but that i knew exactly where i was, but that this place doesn't remember me being there at all. like i’d been forgotten, erased from tree-memory, earth-memory, or something . . . after all those drive-bys, all that attention and devotion . . . right there in the midst of me lamenting its shifts and remembering its shapes, it forgets . . . me, trying to be so in touch with the place and feeling its perishings, and having it spurn like that . . . it’s not just that i’ve lost something, but that something has lost me. this happened to me a lot when i was young. the town i grew up in had these repeated ravagings of the living grass and field and bird and flat dirt path surroundings to make way for spiking population growth . . . and it wasn’t just that places i remembered were gone, but that the places that remembered me were gone . . . could no longer remember. that i had become forgotten by the land itself . . . a small version of a first nations lament that i can hardly stand to have so near . . . great moon, eagle moon, goose moon, frog moon tethered here lesley tait (from latremouille, tait & jardine, in press) and then this, written, my oh my, twenty years ago after my first return from alberta back to southern ontario where i was raised: how things smell, the racket of leaves turning on their stems, how my breath pulls this humid air, how birds songs combine, the familiar directions of sudden thundery winds, the rising insect drills of cicada tree buzzes that i remember so intimately, so immediately, that when they sound, it feels as if this place itself has remembered what i have forgotten, as if my own memory, my own raising, some of my own life, is stored up in these trees for safe keeping. cicadas become archaic storytellers telling me, like all good storytellers, of the life i’d forgotten i’d lived, of deep, fleshy, familial relations that worm their ways out of my belly and breath into these soils, these smells, this air. and i’m left shocked that they know so much, that they remember so well, and that they can be so perfectly articulate. (jardine, 1998, p. 92) a terribly shareable incommensurateness and, of course, to be not remembered by a mother, the very one whose remembering of me shaped me for good or ill as much as anyone and for a long stretch of my life, back when none of this was able to be articulated enough to be anywhere near free of, well, that has a terribly shareable incommensurateness. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 12 7 the very one whose remembering of me greatly shaped my way in this family resemblance (and this, of course, for good or ill, well-meant or otherwise), in losing their memory, loses me, but loosens as well: echoed perhaps in a ripple of air or a brief shrug of a robust bough. . . . alone now, they wind through tangles, relentless. call up to the creators; we are here, we are here. . . . tender parting and elegant flow, a silent passing above the forest floor. wings raise up to gain favour and soften the looming perch. (innes, 2014, pp. 117, 110, 117) so, here’s to my own pate glowing red in the hairbrush sparsenings of grey and white. to mothers. to fathers. to sunflowers and the loft of ravens. so, there go the ravens, my dears, again caught and uncaught on the warm spring-air foothill uplifts. to be dying under their wings is a weird miracle. (jardine, 2018b, p. xiii) and brightness and darkness, remembering and forgetting, here in this great hermeneutic commiseration. i hope it is arced just a bit by sweet looms of sunflowers. afterword nancy moules, 9:03am, november 15th, 2018: i noted that you wrote that you only met thelma once. you actually met her a few times and she had a bit of a crush on you because you gave her a kiss. the first time was at a graduation party that lori limacher had for me. then there was the time with the sunflowers, but i know there was one more time. she liked that you acted interested in her and listened to her. memory. turns out i’m sweeter than i recall. or so someone else remembered me in ways i’d forgotten. references gadamer, h-g. (1983). reason in the age of science. boston, ma: mit press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.; j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. innes, j. (2016). excerpts from “a pocket of darkness” and “time.” in j. seidel & d. jardine (2016)). the ecological heart of teaching: radical tales of refuge and renewal for classrooms and communities (pp. 110, 117). new york, ny: peter lang. jardine, d.w. (1998). birding lessons and the teachings of cicadas. canadian journal of environmental education, 3, 92-9. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 12 8 jardine, d.w. (2018a). sunflowers, coyote, and five red hens. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 4. retrieved from: https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/article/view/53327/pdf jardine, d.w. (2018b). preface: advice in this liquid midst. in e. lyle (ed.). the negotiated self: employing reflexive inquiry to explore teacher identity (pp. vii-xiv). leiden, nl: brill sense publishers. latremouille, j., tait, l., & jardine, d.w. (in press). an ecological pedagogy of joy: on relations, aliveness and love. new york, ny: dio press. moules, n. j., & estefan, a. (2018). editorial: watching my mother die subjectivity and the other side of dementia. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 3. retrieved from: https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/article/view/57328/pdf. on-line etymological dictionary. on-line: https://www.etymonline.com/ sartre, j.p. (1970). intentionality: a fundamental idea in husserl's phenomenology. journal for the british society for phenomenology, 1(2), 3-5. wallace, b. (1989). the stubborn particulars of grace. toronto, on, canada: mcclelland and stewart. wittgenstein, l. (1968). philosophical investigations. cambridge, uk: basil blackwell. 1 counselling psychology, werklund school of education, university of calgary 2 faculty of nursing, university of calgary corresponding author: emily p williams, phd candidate email: emily.williams@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics september 18, 2018 the author(s) 2018 defending hermeneutics emily p. williams1, catherine m. laing2, & isabel brun1 abstract this article offers several perspectives on the challenges of defending gadamerian hermeneutics in applied research settings, specifically counselling psychology and nursing. given the lack of methodological steps associated with the method, researchers employing hermeneutics can be vulnerable to scrutiny from others. we discuss the uncertainty that is inevitable when embarking on hermeneutic inquiry and provide personal accounts of how we have encountered the uncertain nature of hermeneutics. keywords hermeneutics, qualitative research, counselling psychology, nursing part i: post-candidacy the day of my doctoral candidacy exam had finally come. i found myself sitting at the head of a large table in a boardroom, surrounded by five academics. they had general queries about my research proposal (“what inspired this line of inquiry? what is your intended sample?”), and then they narrowed in on the how questions: “how will you analyze your data?,” “how will you manage the unstructured interview?,” and “how will you incorporate your prejudice into your interpretation?” in the moment, i felt like i knew nothing. i said to myself: “wow, and you thought that you were prepared!” i answered as best i could by saying: “interpretation is not always clear until you actually begin the interviews, and until you see the data in front of you.” gauging that my ambiguous answers did not satisfy the examiners sitting across from me, i felt the need to offer more information, trying to fill the holes that i had left open in my previous williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 11 2 response. i felt like these types of questions dominated my exam, and ironically, they were the exact sort of question i felt least prepared to answer. in the days after my exam (and yes, i passed), i (williams) put my thoughts to the keyboard, with the intention of describing my candidacy experience in order to help those who use hermeneutic inquiry in the future. with this objective, i contacted others who have used, and will use, hermeneutic inquiry for various research endeavours. joining me in this paper are the perspectives of an associate professor in a nursing faculty (laing), who used hermeneutics for her doctoral dissertation and has a developed a program of research using hermeneutics, and a doctoral student (brun) who is considering the applicability of hermeneutics for her research. together, we provide our experiences and insights of defending hermeneutic inquiry before the interpretation has begun. defending any type of research method has its challenges, however this is especially true of applied gadamerian hermeneutic inquiry. embracing uncertainty there is an attraction to certainty. lay people and researchers alike are drawn to choices or actions that are clearly this way or that way. in this sense, philosophic hermeneutics, as explicated by the german philosopher, hans-georg gadamer, stands out as different. hermeneutic inquiry is a way of interpreting the world, taking into account that the world is always changing, and our understanding of a phenomenon is rooted in language and history. as such, since the world and our topic of inquiry is bound to change, so too do our interpretations. this practice requires a tolerance of uncertainty, both of the topic and interpretation (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015). thus, it is fitting that gadamer (1960/2013) noted, “the true locus of hermeneutics is this in-between” (p. 306). researchers using hermeneutic inquiry must exist in this in between and resist blindly following a pre-determined method that assumes all cases within the inquiry are the same (caputo, 2015). applying method and rules universally implies that every encounter the researcher has will be similar to its last and resemble the ones to come. “hermeneutics is not a neutral enterprise; we do not simply select a method and aim it at the world to accomplish something we want to do” (moules et al., 2015, p. 58). thus, when conducting hermeneutic research, researchers must navigate their topics while applying foundational pillars of hermeneutics to guide their understanding. essential to philosophical hermeneutic practice is acknowledging that, as researchers, we do not, and cannot, know everything. we welcome our participants’ ability to teach us something new, something that makes our understanding of the topic change (moules et al., 2015). since this is the goal, it does not make sense to use pre-determined steps and apply them to all cases. perhaps this resistance to using a standard system across all cases perplexes researchers not familiar with hermeneutic inquiry, as this is how it seemed during my examination. guidelines versus method while learning about the history and philosophy that has shaped applied hermeneutic practice, i considered the difference between rules and guidelines. “guidelines are not methodological williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 11 3 imperatives. they are in the service of steady, dependable motion” (moules et al., 2015, p. 61). researchers employing hermeneutic inquiry are encouraged to apply their knowledge of how philosophical hermeneutics evolved to applied practice disciplines and to use that understanding to guide them in making responsible, reliable, and defensible decisions. while learning to think like this, it made sense; however, when faced with examiners who required me to demonstrate my thorough understanding of the method i would be using for my dissertation, it was hard to convincingly demonstrate. during my exam, i found myself clinging to a particular page in the book from which i had learned hermeneutics: this is hard work. balancing a description of how to conduct something without offering a map… is challenging. in many ways, the work of hermeneutics as a research approach is somewhat intuitive… we know what we do when we are into the deep work of interpretation and we so often talk with students about how to begin this deep and involved work… to find language, though, to describe this practice was very difficult. (moules et al., 2015, p. 201) during my exam, i tried to relay the idea that hermeneutic work unfolds as it happens. i shared that hermeneutic inquiry is a learned practice, a way of applying theory to the topic, which often feels more comprehensible once one is in the depth of one’s analysis. according to the philosophy and tradition of hermeneutics, my answers aligned with the applied practice; however, when defending hermeneutic work to an audience not familiar with its foundational pillars, i became overwhelmed when tasked with explaining in detail how analysis would occur. in angst, i offered how my interviews and interpretation might proceed. i spoke about implications that my research might yield. ultimately, however, by trying to satisfy someone’s need for certainty, i was answering against the tradition of hermeneutics. hermeneutics embraces uncertainty. being comfortable with ever changing interpretations is essential to the practice. for hermeneutic inquiry, this ambiguity and openness to possibilities is not considered problematic, but rather is thought to be an asset of the approach (moules et al., 2015). ultimately, as a researcher beginning my journey with applied hermeneutics, i struggled to defend the approach’s how questions. i believe that as my interviews commence, and analysis begins, i will appreciate the ambiguity involved with the process, but until then, i will continue to wonder what this process will look like. part ii: academic it is almost unfair to ask a hermeneutic researcher to describe, in detail, how he/she will analyze data not yet collected, yet herein lies the crux of the problem of how hermeneutics exists within the realities of academia, practice, and research. not having an answer to such questions opens students up to vulnerability during exams, and subjects researchers to criticism as their grants are compared to others with “standard” qualitative methodologies, or worse, quantitative studies. as a hermeneutic researcher, i (laing) constantly walk the line between methodological rigor and situating my projects in such a way that they will be funded. too much detail and you are accused of “sounding defensive” or not being “true” to your method; too little detail and you williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 11 4 have not provided enough evidence as to how your project will proceed, methodologically. there is, quite simply, no winning this game. as an academic, there is an irrefutable reality that one needs their research funded and findings published in order to succeed and satisfy the overwhelmingly foregrounded arm of the tripartite mandate: research. it does not take many rejections from funding agencies to start to change your approach with hermeneutics for the realistic reason of getting grants and future publications. we talk about hermeneutics as an art, practice, philosophy, and research approach, however it is much more than these: it is a sensibility and comportment that positions us such that hermeneutics is within us, within our way of being and our ways of thinking. you can recognize a hermeneutic thinker quickly even though they themselves may never have heard the word before. said more simply, people either “get” the gestalt of hermeneutics or they do not. it becomes quickly evident with different lines of questioning who is genuinely curious to understand hermeneutics and who is “on the attack,” trying to discredit this approach. it is a daunting task, when one starts out with philosophical hermeneutics as a research method, to defend one’s work, or more accurately, one’s approach. this, however, is the never-ending responsibility of the hermeneutic researcher, and like all things, one becomes more practiced with it over time. davey (2015) stated that the notion of practice, though not well discussed by gadamer, is a form of “sense-making” (p. 9). practice involves repetition, memory, adjustment, failure and success: upon these rhythms the confidence to perform is built. participatory engagement with a range of practices enables the capacity and confidence to engage and develop. tradition and cultural horizons are the pre-conditions of practice but they do not build the certainties gadamer speaks of. it is the engagement with practice and the self-insight it affords that grounds the certainties and confidence of the practiced performer, whether artist, doctor or scientist. (davey, 2015, pp. 5-6) as we “practice” with hermeneutics, both in the applied sense but also in the sense of making it fit into places it is not well understood, we are better able to “make sense” of this task. we become more practiced and skilled, and the task becomes less onerous because we search less for the “right words” or struggle less with how to articulate something “just right.” over time, with practice, this comes easier. we do ourselves a disservice in many ways, as hermeneutic researchers and scholars, by speaking about applied hermeneutics in sometimes poetic, sometimes overly philosophic, and sometimes even unintelligible ways to anyone who is not practiced with this methodology. we forget one of the foremost rules of communication: know your audience (ricci, 2012). sometimes hermeneutics needs to be discussed plainly, in ways that are understandable for others. while we bemoan the injustice of this (should others not just know and get it?), hermeneutics lives within a world where it is the underdog with respect to research methodologies. in many ways, hermeneutics defies the essentialist nature of a definition (moules et al., 2015), yet herein lies our conundrum as students and practitioners of this methodology – we must continue to find ways to understand, explain, describe, and even force-fit ourselves into the research community. we need a seat at the table, and we need not assume a “poor cousin” stance against the natural sciences or other more easily articulated research methodologies. williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 11 5 when i used to try to negotiate with my children when they were younger it was a futile exercise. they did not understand that in a negotiation, neither party gets exactly what they want, and the whole point of negotiation is to reach an agreement. it is a useless endeavor to engage in this behaviour with a young child who does not yet possess the cognitive ability for this understanding. similarly, when disagreements occur between adults and it sometimes becomes evident that one party is unwilling to move, even slightly, from their position, it quickly becomes apparent that no understanding will occur between them. no one is willing to consider the possibility that the other person may be right. no one is willing to even try to understand what the other is saying; both are invested in their own “rightness.” these two scenarios – negotiating with a child and futile disagreements – are not unlike our task as hermeneutic researchers. sometimes it is evident that the person with whom you are engaging (e.g., an examiner, a grant reviewer) is unwilling to listen. they are not playing by the same rules as we are and, quite frankly, this can be a futile and frustrating experience. we want the ideas of hermeneutics to transcend all: i want gadamer’s idea of a genuine conversation, for example, where the process of question and answer, listening and speaking, and seeing others’ points of view ultimately enabling us to reach new understandings (spence, 2005) to be the norm. when in a genuine dialogue with another, we try to understand how what the other person is saying could be right (gadamer, 1996). in a genuine conversation the concern is with the subject matter and with its possible truth (warnke, 1987), and neither participant claims to know the truth, rather each is open to the other’s views. different understanding – understanding differently – is a foundation upon which we stake a claim in hermeneutics. yet, when the other party does not play by these rules or worse does not even know of their existence, in many ways we are engaging in the equivalent of negotiating with a toddler. sometimes, it feels as though we are alone in this world where quantitative methodologies and natural sciences still reign supreme, as if we have gained no ground here at all. i prefer to think of applied hermeneutics as still in high school – it has not yet peaked – but it will. we are working our way through the awkward years, gaining ground slowly, and trying our best. in the end, that is all we can do. part iii: pre-candidacy as a first year phd student, i (brun) was tasked with finding a dissertation research topic that appealed to me, as well as a method that would fit my dissertation research aims. throughout my entire adult life, i have been passionate about learning about parenting practices that would aid in the development of positive body image for children; however, i was disappointed when i discovered that little work had been done to explore this topic. i was so captivated by the idea of researching parenting practices that encourage the development of positive body image in children that it almost felt like a calling: i needed to do this research not only for myself, but for parents who may be struggling to find ways to not only diminish the chances that their children develop negative body image, but also encourage the development of positive body image for their children. given this strong inclination towards conducting such research, i decided to propose this topic to my supervisor. after a passionate pitch on my behalf, my supervisor suggested that i consider hermeneutic inquiry as my dissertation research method, as it appeared to her that i had been called to this topic, which is often the jumping off point for hermeneutic research (moules et al., williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 11 6 2015). i was slightly put off by my supervisor’s suggestion as i thought to myself: “how do you even do hermeneutic research?” and “isn’t it a philosophy and not a research method?” given my look of contemplation, my supervisor advised that i read about hermeneutic inquiry and decide whether or not it would be a fit for my research. during this time, i felt as though i had to be certain of hermeneutic inquiry’s merit and validity before i could commit to using it for my dissertation. through my readings, i was convinced that hermeneutic inquiry would be the perfect fit for my dissertation research. furthermore, i looked forward to using hermeneutic research to gain a better understanding of my research topic as well as, ultimately, bringing about change in my field of study. defending the how and why of hermeneutic inquiry in my experience, individuals who conduct research are often concerned with the “hows”; they want a step by step guide to follow so that they can conduct research that is “valid” and “rigorous.” i used to be one of those people who relied on predetermined research steps so that i could confidently defend my work (“see, my research is valid: i followed all the steps!”), which is why the thought of conducting hermeneutic research was so daunting. in my understanding, hermeneutic inquiry is not a research method that outlines steps for a researcher to follow; instead, it guides the researcher to adopt a new philosophy or frame of mind (i.e., a genuine interest in considering others’ perspectives related to a specific topic or phenomenon) that leaves them open to gaining a new understanding of their topic (moules et al., 2015). this different perspective may be difficult for researchers who are statistically minded to embrace, and i have personally experienced their skepticism when describing my proposed dissertation. given the reluctance i have encountered while explaining my dissertation plans to “non-hermeneuts,” i have developed the following analogy to explain hermeneutic research: most individuals have participated in a conversation, with another person in which they have experienced a significant shift in their understanding of a particular topic. i can only describe these shifts in understanding as oprah’s “aha moments.” throughout my childhood, i would sit in front of the television on a nightly basis to watch my favourite television show, oprah. i watched oprah experience many “aha moments” where you could actually see her experiencing a shift of perspective as a result of dialoguing with an interviewee; it was like a light bulb had turned on in her mind which illuminated a new understanding of the subject matter at hand. during these “aha moments” an individual’s perspective suddenly changes, they begin to understand the topic differently, and this new understanding cannot be unlearned (i.e., they cannot go back to the way they previously understood the topic). as i understand the process of conducting hermeneutic research, researchers take on a mindset that opens them up to experiencing “aha moments.” in addition to adopting a frame of mind that is conducive to these experiences, they conduct interviews in a manner that makes it more likely for their participants to share experiences or information that will prompt such shifts in understanding (i.e., by creating conditions akin to gadamer’s genuine conversation; spence, 2005). through practice, hermeneutic researchers become more apt at interviewing participants which enables them to gather rich data. furthermore, once a shift in understanding has been williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 11 7 experienced by the researcher, it is up to him or her to recreate the “aha moment,” through the writing of their findings, for others. the resulting hermeneutic work will, hopefully, produce a similar shift in understanding for those who read it. another feature of hermeneutic research that convinced me of its merit was its focus on developing phronesis, which translates to practical wisdom (i.e., knowledge and skills that can be applied to practice; moules et al., 2015). while conducting hermeneutic research, researchers are concerned with coming to a new understanding of the studied topic and disseminating this new understanding in a way that will have practical implications. overall, hermeneutic research is not only about gaining a new understanding of the world, it is also about changing it (moules et al., 2015). one could say that hermeneutic inquiry’s catch phrase is: “when you know differently, you do differently.” given the focus on phronesis, hermeneutic researchers take on the mindset that when we acquire insight that has practical implications for the world, we are ethically obligated to act on it (moules et al., 2015). thus, as a hermeneutic researcher, i commit myself to conducting research that will have practical implications for my field of study, and i will disseminate this knowledge in a way that may bring about change. in sum, i want to make a difference in this world, and hermeneutic inquiry offers the framework that will aid in the realization of this aim. conclusion as these three accounts suggest, defending the process of hermeneutic research can come as a challenge. given the lack of methodological steps associated with hermeneutic inquiry, it leaves hermeneutic researchers vulnerable to scrutiny from others (e.g., exam or funding committees). for this reason, we decided to offer our experience and insights related to defending hermeneutic research in the hopes that it would help others, who use this method, to articulate its value, despite the lack of procedural steps. as such, we present our experiences in parts i, ii, and iii to argue that hermeneutic research involves embracing uncertainty, as it is in uncertainty that we open ourselves to experiencing “aha moments” or profound shifts in understanding. furthermore, we suggest that hermeneutic researchers be guided by phronesis, which involves gaining new understandings of certain topic or phenomenon and acting upon them to create change. overall, although a difficult methodology to defend, it is important to stay faithful to the philosophy that guides hermeneutic inquiry by remaining open to interpretation, wherever it may lead us. references caputo, j.d. (2015). foreword: the wisdom of hermeneutics. in n.j. moules, g. mccaffrey, j.c. field, & c.m. laing, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice (pp. ix xiii). new york, ny: peter lang. davey, n. (2015). a hermeneutics of practice: philosophical hermeneutics and the epistemology of participation. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 7. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5707x51 gadamer, h.g. (1996). the enigma of health. stanford, ca: stanford university press. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5707x51 williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 11 8 gadamer, h.g. (1960/2013). truth and method (bloomsbury revelations; j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). london, uk: bloomsbury. moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. ricci, t. (2012). public speaking: know your audience. retrieved from https://www.asme.org spence, d.g. (2001). hermeneutic notions illuminate cross-cultural nursing experiences. journal of advanced nursing, 35(4), 624-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01879.x warnke, g. (1987). gadamer: hermeneutics, tradition and reason. stanford, ca: stanford university press. https://www.asme.org/ 1 university of prince edward island 2 dalhousie university corresponding author: charlene a. vanleeuwen email: cvanleeuwen@upei.ca journal of applied hermeneutics july 19, 2017 the author(s) 2017 conducting hermeneutic research in international settings: philosophical, practical, and ethical considerations charlene a. vanleeuwen1, linyuan guo-brennan1, & lori e. weeks2 abstract hermeneutics has been theorized and applied as a philosophical framework and interpretive research methodology which pays particular attention to linguistic, social, cultural, and historical contexts to understand the life world and human experiences. while adopted as a qualitative research approach in the fields of education, nursing, psychology, and legal studies, its use is emerging in other human service disciplines. the rich philosophical and theoretical legacy embedded in this research methodology often presents unique challenges and a steep learning curve for researchers, particularly when the research is conducted in international settings. drawing from insights gained from two hermeneutic studies conducted in kenya and china, this paper presents considerations for designing a hermeneutic research inquiry. in addition to philosophical, practical, and ethical issues researchers need to consider when designing and implementing hermeneutic studies in international settings, we examine factors and strategies to facilitate successful data collection and interpretation. keywords hermeneutics, interpretive research methodology, international research researchers who are interested in conducting qualitative research in international settings need to explore and adopt research methodologies that allow them to integrate the cultural, historical, and linguistic characteristics of the research setting into research design and implementation. hermeneutics, a research philosophy and interpretive methodology, has been widely adopted as a qualitative research approach for research in the fields of education, social sciences, and vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 2 humanities because it acknowledges and highlights the linguistic, social, cultural and historical contexts in research design and implementation. however, the rich philosophical and theoretical legacy embedded in hermeneutics and the distinctive methods, procedures, and writing style associated with hermeneutic inquiry often presents challenges and steep learning curves for researchers, particularly for graduate students who are interested in using a hermeneutic inquiry approach in international research. drawing from insights gained from two hermeneutic studies conducted in kenya and china, we discuss the philosophical, methodological, practical, and ethical issues researchers need to consider when designing and implementing a hermeneutic study in international settings. we start with a brief summary of the hermeneutical orientations that guided the two international studies, and this summary is followed by discussions about the practical issues researchers need to consider in conducting hermeneutic research in international settings. using the two studies as examples, we discuss how a researcher’s role as a cultural insider or outsider affects the research process. we conclude with a discussion and critical analysis of ethical considerations for international hermeneutic studies. international research can mean different things to different researchers. for the context of this paper, international research is defined as studies conducted overseas that involve relationships and understanding between and among nations, cultures, peoples, wisdom traditions, and discourses. the two international studies described in this paper were carried out in settings outside of canada where the researchers’ home institutions were based. both studies intentionally examined and incorporated the interconnected relationships of cultural identities, wisdom traditions, epistemologies, and ontologies between canada and the other country where the research was conducted. hermeneutics as a research philosophy research design involves the intersection of research philosophy, inquiry strategies, and specific methods and procedures. research philosophy reflects a researcher’s general orientation about the world and the nature of the study and is shaped by her/his discipline, personal and research experiences, and the beliefs and orientation of an adviser, advisory committee, or prominent scholars in the chosen field of study (creswell, 2009). when selecting a research approach, the first task of the researcher is to understand, and be able to explicitly explain, the philosophical assumptions supporting his/her choice. the process of understanding and articulating a worldview and philosophical assumptions helps researchers become aware of how traditions, culture, motivations, identity, and institutional structures can impact their understanding and choice of a research philosophy and methodology. hermeneutics is defined as the science or art of interpretation (gadamer, 1976; malpas, 2014; porter & robinson, 2011). derived from the greek verb hermeneuein, the term hermeneutics means to understand or interpret (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015; patton, 2015). emerging in the nineteenth century in reaction to the dominance of positivist scientific approaches, hermeneutics was theorized and applied as a philosophical framework as well as a research methodology for understanding the world and human experiences that gives special attention to the context in the human sciences (gadamer, 1976; guo, 2010; patton, 2015). the vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 3 task of hermeneutics is not to solve problems in practical situations, but to serve as a mode of reflecting to question the meaning of being and to clarify the interpretive conditions for understanding the meaning of human experiences by attending to the roles of language, culture, historicity, and pre-understandings (davey, 2017; gadamer, 1976; guo, 2010). kinsella (2006) described hermeneutics as an approach that (a) seeks understanding rather than explanation; (b) acknowledges the situated location of interpretation; (c) recognizes the role of language and historicity in interpretation; (d) views inquiry as a conversation; and (e) is comfortable with ambiguity. these characteristics lend themselves well to international research contexts. different from the post-positivist worldview shaping most empirical research with a focus on problems and identifying objective reality through careful observation and unbiased measurement, hermeneutics allows a researcher to discern whether or not a problem truly exists through deeper understanding. hermeneutics offers researchers an approach to explore and understand the complexity of a topic or phenomenon (mccaffrey, raffin-bouchal, & moules, 2012; moules et al., 2015) without problematizing a situation prematurely or inappropriately due to an inadequate understanding of the research context and topic. researchers’ pre-understanding is embraced as a constructive contribution to the research process rather than a potential source of bias, an attractive and prominent advantage of adopting hermeneutics in international research (moules, 2002). this active role of the interpreter through self-reflection can provide an opportunity to refine reflection skills and develop self-understanding. these are principal tasks in hermeneutics. the integration of interpretation, historicity, and critical reflection in hermeneutic inquiry allows a researcher to understand human experiences from comparative perspectives and reexamine practices that are closely defined by traditions, cultures, history, and languages. hermeneutics permits researchers to explore complex, dynamic relationships and experiences while acknowledging issues such as asymmetries of power relations, gender (in)equality, or other contextual and historical factors (mccaffery & moules, 2016). this approach is appealing to international researchers because designing and implementing research in international settings is complex and demanding and often involves comparative perspectives, choosing different or modifying research methods, a lack of literature with international/global perspectives, and cultural uncertainty and ambiguity. hermeneutics provides researchers the space to identify and understand various perspectives on human experiences which is advantageous in international research (grondin, 2002; ricoeur, 1981). meanwhile, incorporating the voices of participants in the construction of meaning through conversational interview approaches that affirm and reinforce positive cultural identities of participants can have a decolonizing effect, which is an important concern in conducting research in locations with a history of colonization (kovach, 2010). in addition, international research particularly requires a researcher’s thoughtful consideration of how her/his unique linguistic capacity and cultural identity influences the inquiry at hand and his/her pre-understandings, prejudices, and foreknowledge about the research topic and context. hermeneutics brings awareness to a researcher’s positionality as a cultural insider or outsider in international research and creates opportunities for understanding human experiences from multiple and comparative perspectives. the relational, reflexive and artistic options provided by hermeneutics allow researchers to understand the depth and nuances of human experience and provide an interpretive lens of making meaning of the day-to-day experiences (jardine, 2006; newberry, 2012). since vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 4 hermeneutics is not focused on a predetermined horizon and can generate new understandings of practical wisdoms, or phronesis, it has been adopted by researchers that work within the applied domains of the human sciences such as education, clinical psychology, social work, occupational therapy, medicine, legal studies, criminology, and psychiatry (chowdhury, 2016; guo, 2010; kinsella, bossers, & ferreira, 2008; laing, 2012; macquarrie, 2005; mccaffery & moules, 2016; newberry, 2012; ovens, 2014; von zweck, paterson, & pentland, 2008). cross-cultural competence effective use of context allows cultural factors to be foregrounded in international research (stephens, 2012). in the process of conducting international hermeneutic research, the researcher’s positionality can be viewed as cultural insider (i.e., collecting data within one’s cultural community), cultural outsider (i.e., collecting data outside of one’s cultural community) or a combination of both. an awareness of a researcher’s positionality is critical and necessary for research design, preparation, and implementation, and reporting in an international context. a culturally competent researcher is aware of his/her own cultural identity, understands the cultural norms of the research setting, seeks to minimize and cope with cultural differences, articulates the cultural explanations of perspectives and behaviors, has cross-cultural communication skills, and capitalizes on the similarities of common experiences. the hermeneutic practice of articulating prejudices and biases can bring awareness to the cultural and academic filters that may be encountered in the interpretive process. preparatory reading for cross-cultural research, reflection, and discussions with local contacts or a critical friend can also serve to sensitize the researcher to contextual issues that might otherwise be missed or not questioned. utilizing a critical friend will be discussed in the section on preparing to conduct international hermeneutic inquiry. the collaborative stance in hermeneutic inquiry may be unfamiliar and initially uncomfortable to research participants given their cultural experience or the perceived power imbalance in the research relationship. accordingly, there may be a need to nurture in-depth conversations with participants through taking extra time to develop the research relationship and making a concerted effort to carefully ask probing questions during conversations to achieve a fusion of horizons. it is necessary to demonstrate the ability to conduct research that is trustworthy and respectful of the cultural context and divergent worldviews; these are features of decolonized research which will be discussed in greater detail below. a hermeneutic approach shifts the orientation away from the outsider’s voice, placing the researcher in a less authoritative position while privileging the voice of the participants (carson, 1986; stephens, 2009). researchers’ hermeneutic orientations illustrated in case studies reflecting on the case of a chinese researcher conversing with chinese teachers in china and a canadian researcher collecting data from kenyan university students in kenya, the authors present the key principles underpinning their hermeneutic research studies in international settings. this overview is illustrated by two case studies which critically examine how the authors’ research positionality affected methodological, epistemological and ethical considerations. the first case is hermeneutic research conducted by guo (2010) that aimed to vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 5 understand what the nation-wide new curriculum reform in china meant for teachers who experienced the inspirations and struggles during curriculum implementation. the second case is a hermeneutic inquiry conducted by vanleeuwen (2017) to explore kenyan university students’ learning experiences in community-based field placements and what community-based learning meant for their academic, personal, and professional growth. hermeneutic principles guiding the international research hermeneutic literature and tapestry has categorized hermeneutics into five orientations, including romantic or conservative hermeneutics, phenomenological hermeneutics, critical hermeneutics, radical hermeneutics, and philosophical hermeneutics. each hermeneutic orientation has distinctive concepts and principles. the hermeneutic orientations guiding the authors in conducting the case studies in china and kenya are philosophical, radical, and critical. for example, the goal of romantic or conservative hermeneutics is to reproduce and reconstruct interpretation (ramberg & gjesdal, 2013). this orientation emphasizes the importance of language as the medium of understanding and the role of dialogue in the extension of understanding (moules et al., 2015). phenomenological hermeneutics requires researchers to reflect on their pre-understanding, framework, and biases. this orientation requires a researcher to search for genuine openness to engage in a conversational relation with phenomena (van manen 2006; van manen & adams, 2010). “epoché” and “reduction” are two important concepts in phenomenological hermeneutics. epoché deals with freeing oneself of (“bracketing”) assumptions, and reduction deals with returning to the original sources of people’s experiences. reduction refers to a regimen designed to transform a philosopher into a phenomenologist by the attainment of a certain perspective on the world phenomenon. phenomenological hermeneutics allows a researcher to use an interpretive approach to gain deep understanding of phenomena and uncover the complex realities of difficult life situations (van manen, 2006). philosophical hermeneutics offers several key principles which informed these two inquiries. the hermeneutic circle is an important concept in philosophical hermeneutics and it refers to the elements of the ontological structure of understanding (gadamer, 1960/1975). philosophical hermeneutics recognizes that understanding is reached within a fusion of horizons. through the collaborative, cyclical, interpretive process, the researcher and the participant(s) reach a fusion of horizons and gain a more profound understanding of the experiences being studied (gadamer, 1976). philosophical hermeneutic principles assist the researchers in bringing the historical context, cultural traditions, and our prior knowledge into the hermeneutic circle because such prior knowledge served as an enabler to understanding, rather a barrier (jacobs, 2014; malpas, 2014; moules, 2002). philosophical hermeneutics is a very open domain of enquiry which cannot be definitively defined or understood (davey, 2017). the task of hermeneutics is to clarify the interpretive conditions in which understanding takes place (gadamer, 1976). the preparation and reflection process was important in setting the stage through a heightened sensitivity to language, tradition, historicity, culture, and our personal subjectivity as the fertile ground upon which conversations and understandings occur (gadamer, 1960/1975; jardine, 2006). understanding our prejudices, the values, experiences or “fore-structures” as researchers, enabled us as researchers to be open to dialogue and new possibilities and avoid closing off dialogue because vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 6 the conversations were used only as confirmation or contradiction of an established position (davey, 2006; gadamer, 1976; malpas, 2014; von zweck et al., 2008). critical hermeneutics attempts to critique the relations of power inherent in tradition, and to expose the institutionalized, reproductive exploitations of persons and classes (apple, 1982; friere, 1970; giroux, 1983; habermas, 1971). critical hermeneutics advocates critical reflection which can neutralize researchers’ experiences through self-reflective methodologies to that of a non-participative, external observer who emancipates interpretations from authority structures (jacobs, 2014). critical hermeneutics allows researchers to become aware of the impact of traditions, culture, ideology, institutional, and organizational structure and attends to the extralinguistic forces that possibly influence the interpretations of meanings. an important concept in critical hermeneutics is the hermeneutic arc, the back and forth movement between the text as a whole and its constituent parts during the interpretative process. as analysis continued through the back and forth movement between explanation and understanding, interrelated and complementary processes, understanding deepens, and initial or naïve understandings are discounted, re-oriented, or accepted and gradually expanded upon, keeping in mind that all phases of analysis are informed by the interpreter’s pre-understanding (ricoeur, 1981; tan, wilson, & olver, 2009). radical hermeneutics uses deconstruction as the primary interpretive tool to disrupt and destabilize expectations rather than determining truth (caputo, 1987; porter & robinson, 2011). radical hermeneutics settles on the indeterminacy of interpretation because it recognizes that interpretive acts cannot escape one’s subjectivity and always privileges one meaning over many possible others where the meaning of experiences emerged through a relation with what it was not (porter & robinson, 2011). case 1: researcher as a cultural insider china has the world’s largest and oldest public education system with deep roots in its cultural and historical traditions. the new national curriculum, which was heavily informed and influenced by western philosophy and epistemology, represented a radical departure from traditional chinese education and brought tremendous ambiguity and dilemma to chinese teachers during the implementation process. the hermeneutic research aimed to reveal the complexity of the new curriculum reform by understanding teachers’ experiences in curriculum reform and the contributing factors to the challenges and struggles during new curriculum implementation (guo, 2010). a combination of philosophical and radical hermeneutics was adopted as the inquiry approach to fulfill the dual methodological tasks of this study – understanding the meaning of curriculum reform and transforming education practice through interpretation. participants were six educators in western china and three conversations were conducted with each participant over a period of four weeks. as a chinese native and a researcher from a canadian university while conducting this study, guo grew up in china and obtained educational and professional experiences in both chinese and canadian contexts. she viewed herself as a “cultural insider” when entering the research field. this positionality affected the research process from different angles. first, as a chinese native speaker, the researcher was able to conduct a literature review in both chinese and vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 7 english. the thorough literature review helped the researcher identify a topic and research design absent in both chinese and english literature as well as to make the research topic and questions significant and relevant to local, national and international research contexts. second, the shared cultural, linguistic, and ethnic identity between the researcher and the participants allowed the researcher to obtain a deeper understanding the social, political and academic contexts of the research settings. they also served as advantages in recruiting participants through culturally responsive strategies (e.g., phone calls, emails, meetings, introduction by a third party) and in establishing trust and rapport with the participants. third, the researcher could minimize the logistical challenges of data collection in china, such as booking flights and hotels, scheduling meetings, and making travel arrangement to research sites. fourth, the researcher could have conversations with the research participants in chinese, which allowed the participants to freely share their experiences and express their insights. the conversations were transcribed in chinese first and fully translated into english. hermeneutic inquiry expects a researcher to understand and interpret not only what is said, but also what is unsaid by the participants. being a chinese native speaker offered the researcher linguistic and cultural advantages to achieve this task during the data collection and interpretation process. such advantages enabled the researcher to understand the power relationships, participants’ social-economic positions, their concerns for confidentiality and anonymity, and the proper procedures needed for obtaining research consent and engaging in ethical research appropriate for the research site. last, an insider’s in-depth understanding of the research context and topic provides the opportunities to facilitate the fusion of the researcher and participants’ horizon on the topic by sharing new perspectives during research conversations. case 2: researcher as a cultural outsider the decision to employ hermeneutics came as a surprise to vanleeuwen who was looking at methodologies which would incorporate context in meaningful ways, work from a cultural outsiders’ perspective and serve as means to decolonize the research process in kenya. hermeneutics fits these criteria and the resultant inquiry was informed by a combination of three strands of hermeneutics. firstly, adopting a critical hermeneutical orientation allowed her to highlight how traditions, culture and institutional structures impact the experiences of participants. as a cultural outsider, her interpretations were different based on her unique preunderstandings, prejudices, foreknowledge, and preparation for research in the field. critical hermeneutics provided opportunity to consider motivation as well as focus on issues such as asymmetries of power relations, gender (in)equality, and the colonial and indigenous contexts of kenya. utilization of ricoeur’s (1981) theory of interpretation offered procedural, interpretive, evaluative, and reflexive rigor in data interpretation. given the significant role played by preunderstanding and positionality as a cultural outsider, plurivocity or multiple interpretations are very probable and expected within critical and philosophical hermeneutics (grondin, 2002; ricoeur, 1981). secondly, the deconstructive process in radical hermeneutics allowed her to consider what is and is not said by participants (caputo, 1987; porter & robinson, 2011). philosophical hermeneutics was the third and principal strand of hermeneutics utilized. the fusion of horizons was the concept that attracted her to hermeneutics, however, it was the process of learning about and communicating the historicity of context that confirmed the suitability of hermeneutics for international cross-cultural research, where sensitivity to context is essential (gadamer, 1976; moules, 2002). hermeneutic methodology acknowledges researcher vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 8 prejudices and uses them in the interpretive process by recognizing relationships and legitimizing the subjectivity of researcher interpretations (mccaffery et al., 2012). the deeper she ventured into hermeneutics as philosophy, theory, and methodology, the more she learned about her own prejudices and biases, thereby enhancing awareness of the cultural and academic filters that could be employed or encountered in the interpretive process. six university students in kenya enrolled in a program that focused on preparing students to work as professionals providing community and human services were purposely selected and invited to participate based on their gender, ethnic/tribal heritage, type of organization and the location of their field placement. data was collected by conducting three conversations with each participant over three weeks, one focus group, and photovoice. the participants were fluently multilingual in three languages, their home or tribal language, kiswahili and english. english was the common language between the researcher and participants and was used for the research conversations and focus group. as a canadian researcher of irish and french canadian heritage, vanleeuwen had travelled to kenya and collaborated for over 4 years with kenyan university faculty through research and international development projects in their shared discipline of family sciences. these prior experiences provided her with a preliminary understanding of the kenyan context and culture. however, she could only work with one official language (english), but not with the second official language (swahili) or the languages used by indigenous ethic groups. she considered herself as a “cultural outsider” when entering the research field due to limited exposure to kenyan culture and language skills. this positionality as an outsider affected the research process in several ways. first, embarking on a hermeneutic inquiry requires that researchers articulate their prejudices and prior understandings and gadamer insists that prior hermeneutical situatedness incorporate cultural and historical background (porter & robinson, 2011). as a cultural outsider, a researcher needs to reflect and explore prejudices and (new) understanding in relation to perceptions and experiences of the unfamiliar cultural context and his/her values associated with local knowledge (gadamer, 1976). reading about the context to prepare for the multitude of cultural differences and articulating these pre-understandings is only the beginning. being prepared to engage with strangeness in the process of trying to make sense of things that fall outside of our experience was also required (smith, 2003). second, in addition to self-location as a researcher, it is essential to consider the purpose and motivations guiding the research (kovach, 2009). as a canadian aware of the exploitation experienced by canada’s first nations communities, the potential for the research to be experienced as a form of re-colonization was a concern. actions were taken throughout the inquiry to decolonize the research for example by articulating awareness and sensitivity to the colonial experience. fourth, using a hermeneutic approach as a cultural outsider makes it easier for a researcher to be attentive to the dynamics around issues such as power, language use, and gender. this positionality provides the researcher rich opportunities to observe cultural factors from a comparative perspective, where possible, and to critically examine their influences on the data collection and analysis processes as a researcher’s ongoing reflexivity. fifth, within the hermeneutic tradition, it is important to remain open and alert so that the layers of complexities and additional questions can be revealed through conversations, however, accents and local differences in language usage can interfere with this vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 9 process. a cultural outsider needs to adopt active listening strategies and clarify ambiguous expressions during conversations with participants. careful re-listening is required during the process of data analysis and interpretation to understand the meanings generated from what is said and unsaid. finally, thorough preparation for field work in international settings is vitally important for a researcher as a cultural outsider to make data collection processes smooth and productive. preparing to conduct international hermeneutic inquiry there are many key issues that researchers need to examine when planning to conduct an international hermeneutic inquiry. in this section, we examine aspects of decolonizing research knowledge, pragmatic and logistical factors, utilizing a critical friend, and ethical issues. while these considerations are not exclusive to international research, these are considerations that we found to be particularly helpful to keep in mind. decolonizing research knowledge conducting research in international settings is often a complex process looking at difficult questions and issues with different theoretical lenses (e.g., anti-colonial, liberatory, feminist) and perspectives rooted in indigenous cultures, histories and heritage (dei, 2012). a consistent thread in this discourse is the focus on asserting humanity in light of terribly dehumanizing imperatives of colonialism related to language, social and cultural relations, and the economy (e.g., smith, 1999; wa thiong’o, 1981). the strength of anti-colonialism rests in how it examines systems of oppression structured along lines of difference (e.g., race, class, gender, sexuality, [dis]ability, language, religion, ethnicity) repositioning the notion of agency and resistance into the heart of the framework to give voice to the oppressed and serve as a tool for accountability for the colonizer (dei & asgharzadeh, 2001; simmons & dei, 2012). this gives rise to empowerment, the underlying purpose for decolonizing research, by recognizing the processes of knowledge production, how it was or is legitimized, and prioritizing research benefits to indigenous communities (beeman-cadwallader, quigley, & yazzie-mintz, 2011). as scholars, researchers and knowledge producers, there is need to move beyond simply challenging epistemological imperialism to rooting our practices in contexts which affirm the languages, perspectives, social values, and worldviews of our research participants (dei, 2012). in choosing to conduct international hermeneutic research in countries with a colonial history, concerns related to re-colonization and knowledge exploitation need to be explicitly addressed (beeman-cadwallader et al., 2011; ndimande, 2012). this can be accomplished when researchers read broadly and deeply on issues associated with the experience of colonialism and colonial residue, articulate an appropriate level of sensitivity to the colonial experience, ensure robust cultural competence, and develop a strong awareness of the key issues and the factors which have and continue to influence the life experiences of participants. these decolonizing actions are consistent with the hermeneutic practice of articulating foreknowledge and prejudices. decolonization of research is a dynamic, evolving process and recognizing the potential for international research to be viewed as exploitative, careful consideration should be given to vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 10 models for the conduct of culturally appropriate research. the work of indigenous and nonindigenous scholars should inform the research design (kovach, 2009; smith, 1999). studies by non-indigenous researchers who have co-researched with indigenous researchers are valuable information sources on research practices to avoid re-colonization effects (fleet & kitson, 2013; hodge & lester, 2006; smithers graeme, 2013; smithers graeme & mandawe, 2017; stelmach, 2009). researchers are advised to take the time needed to establish authentic relationships and promote collaboration during all phases of study by spending time in the setting, learning the language, and making findings available to participants (beeman-cadwallader et al., 2011). this promotes phronesis, the habit of attentiveness and understanding of life as it is lived. deliberations such as these were important to gadamer (1960/1975) and are not only effective strategies for decolonizing research; they are also vital aspects of hermeneutic practice. differences in philosophical, theoretical and practical perspectives between indigenous and western contexts often cause confusion and frustrations in research. this tension can be alleviated by having a more critical understanding of the underlying assumptions, theories, values, and methods that inform decolonized research practices, combined with a deep and rich understanding of the specific local context required within hermeneutic tradition, which can support understanding from an indigenous perspective (moules et al., 2015; ndimande, 2012). hermeneutic inquiry, where knowledge is co-constructed with research participants through the fusion of horizons within the hermeneutic circle/spiral (gadamer, 1960/1995; moules, 2002; porter & robinson, 2011), requires a researcher to be aware of and sensitive to such differences. for graduate students who are cultural outsiders, an important decolonizing action that can be considered is the purposeful selection of a supervisory committee with expertise on the international context. the knowledge, skills, and experience that committee members bring to the table can be a very helpful counterbalance to a graduate student’s limited international research experience. their vigilant oversight as academic advisors can help ensure the cultural competence of the research. pragmatic and logistical factors international research requires thoughtful preparation and careful attention to pragmatic and logistical issues. determining the amount of time to dedicate to field work requires meticulous attention to all the required research tasks. a comprehensive plan can ensure that appropriate time and resources are allocated to essential tasks and all processes are included. special consideration may need to be given to situations where the researcher is unknown to the participants with time and effort dedicated to establishing relationships and developing rapport. in circumstances where the researcher does not speak the local language, planning to work with a translator may be a consideration. given the significant role language plays in hermeneutic research, the benefits would need to be carefully weighed against the challenges and limitations that this would place on the data analysis and interpretation processes. external factors can also influence the timing of a research visit, thus staying abreast of current events where the research is to be conducted is important. as experienced researchers know, field work rarely proceeds exactly as planned, so it is prudent to factor in a healthy percentage of extra time. however, this comes with a cost, as extending field work means additional expenses vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 11 for travel and accommodation. while it is important to remain focused on the goal of data collection, prepare to be flexible when carefully laid plans come apart, and be resourceful and open to inventive solutions when issues arise. for example, we have had to deal with extended electrical power brownouts or outages, unfamiliar civic or religious holidays, being sensitive to gender proprieties for one-on-one conversations or interviews when participants are of the opposite gender, and very different cultural and administrative expectations related to class attendance at the beginning of a semester (e.g., students do not attend class until their tuition fees are paid in full, which can take a period of weeks). spending extensive time on field work requires adequate resources. in addition to funds, this can be a time-consuming undertaking. having a trusted local contact person to work with in making arrangements can be a huge benefit, such as a liaison for recruiting participants or securing a place for the research conversations or helping to arrange researcher accommodations for field work. developing a comprehensive budget can ensure that essential expenses are included. when expenses for entry visas, research permits, immunizations or medications, such as antimalarials, and medical and travel insurance premiums are added to those for international travel, accommodation, food, local transport and possibly interpreter/translation services, the final tally is not insignificant. for some, these expenses are a prohibitive barrier to conducting international research. in an era when research funding is limited, funders may question or decide not to fund a project that either appears to have unrealistic expenses or an inadequate budget. utilizing a critical friend for international researchers, it can be very helpful to have a “critical friend” from the research site to provide local support at different points in the research process (costa & kallick, 1993). this role is separate from, but complementary to, academic supervision provided by supervisors and committee members of graduate students (appleton, 2011). engaging one or more critical friends in an international research inquiry can serve as a mechanism to strengthen awareness and sensitivity to various contextual and historical factors which shape hermeneutic interpretation and maintain researcher integrity in particular with regard to monocultural interpretation (appleton, 2011; baskerville & goldblatt, 2009). a critical friend can be invited for several purposes. first, she or he may help the researcher facilitate local logistical arrangements, provide support during the ethical review or assist with participant recruitment. second, for a researcher as cultural outsider, a critical friend may serve as a cultural guide, a translator if participants use words or phrases in an ethnic language, or a note taker if focus groups are used. a critical friend who is familiar with the research topic and context can ask thoughtful, provocative, and challenging questions about the research design; engage in conversations that clarify the researcher’s perspectives during data collection; provide critique to data interpretation; and participate in knowledge dissemination and translation in international settings. for international researchers, these purposeful discussions and communications with a critical friend could be conducted through e-mail, mail, google chat, skype, and other forms of electronic communications (appleton, 2011; costa & kallick, 1993). finally, in acknowledgement of the myriad challenges that come from carefully studying and becoming familiar with the topic, a critical friend can “commiserate and console and clarify” (jardine, 2016, p. 1). vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 12 ethical considerations depending on the context of the inquiry to be undertaken and the participants’ situation, international researchers need to be clear if additional ethic reviews are needed. for example, the school boards involved in the study conducted in western china do not have policy and procedures in place for research; the researcher only needed to have the research plan reviewed and approved by the canadian university where the she initiated the study. however, in the context of the study in kenya, the researcher had to apply for a government research permit and request research affiliation with a research institution or local community organization in kenya. as the result, extra time was planned and allocated to have these additional reviews approved before data collection. given the volume of data that can be generated in hermeneutic research and the distances involved for field work, data organization is key since researchers cannot easily return to the field if they discover that something is missing, or lost and not recoverable. all documents should be digitalized to facilitate transfer of documents to and from the international location. plan to have all raw digital data (photos or recordings) backed up regularly and stored in a secure location away from the primary work location. early in the planning stages of the inquiry, it is prudent to develop plans to meet institutional requirements for protecting research data and carefully investigate whether there are any legal restrictions on transnational or international data collection in the country to avoid problems later. data collection methods data collection methods in hermeneutic inquiry cannot be simply formalized into a series of technical procedures; a variety of modes of inquiry or activities can be utilized to conduct hermeneutic inquiry. in this section, we introduce methods we have adopted to understand and interpret the meaning of human experiences. these methods of conversation, photovoice, focus group discussions, and reflective journals and field notes are consistent with kinsella’s (2006) description of hermeneutic inquiries, reveal the cross-cultural competence of the researcher, and can help avoid re-colonization of participants. conversation characterized as a dialectic dialogue process of question and answer, giving and taking, talking at cross-purposes, seeing each other’s point through working out the common meaning, conversation has long been recognized as a research mode for collecting, analyzing and making meaning of data (carson, 1986; feldman, 1999; gadamer, 1960/1975; guo, 2010). conversation allows the researcher and participants to share knowledge, develop deeper understanding of the topic, and help each other make meaning of the topic under discussion (feldman, 1999; guo, 2010). the dialogic nature of hermeneutics gives researchers the ability to ask questions about complex human situations that are centred in language and the historical, highlighting the critical importance of context (moules et al., 2015). as hermeneutics ventures deeply into the contextual world of research participants, researchers are called to consider not only what is said, but also vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 13 what is silenced or not said (grondin, 1995, cited in moules et al., 2015). utilization of a conversational method is congruent with hermeneutics as a philosophical orientation, but also within an indigenous worldview (kovach, 2010). privileging participants’ voices using conversation can affirm and reinforce positive cultural identities of participants (ndimande, 2012). while serving as an efficient data collection method, conversation is also an oral inquiry and horizon-expanding process in hermeneutic inquiry. conversations with participants, as opposed to highly structured interviews, create spaces for thoughtful reflection and expanded horizons on the experiences being studied (carson, 1986; guo, 2010). seeking to advance understanding of a topic through a discovery of other people’s standpoints and horizon is the nature of hermeneutic conversations. this requires the researcher and the participants to pay attention to the different perspectives or experiences the “other” has to share in order to achieve a fusion of horizons. therefore, strong cross-cultural competence is a prerequisite for conducting hermeneutic research in international settings and is important to ensure successful and productive research conversations. we found that using culturally appropriate greetings were useful tactics for building rapport with participants and creating an atmosphere for conversations to flourish. in the kenyan study, this involved standing, shaking hands, and sharing personal stories or experiences. due to the inherent differences between oral and written means of discourse, particularly in cross-cultural or international situations where interviews may be facilitated through the work of a translator, a pilot process run can be most helpful to identify issues before beginning data collection conversations (kvale & brinkmann, 2009). when conducting hermeneutic conversations, researchers can share their experiences related to the research topic or bring perspectives contradictory to participants’ expressions to achieve the fusion of horizon (guo, 2010). in addition, thoughtful choices of words to converse with participants can help keep the research conversation genuine and maintain inclusive, thoughtful, and respectful relationships with participants. research conversations in international settings are often more complex and situational than what was planned in research design phases, therefore, researchers are expected to appreciate the essential difficulty of conducting hermeneutic conversations in cross-cultural settings. participants may relate to the in-depth conversation as a structured interview, therefore, researchers need to intentionally preserve openness during the conversation and be prepared to face the challenges of asking questions of a personal nature to direct the inquiry deeper and re-focus the conversation related to the research topic when they go beyond research boundaries and social conventions (baglin & rugg, 2010; guo, 2010; moules, field, mccaffrey, & laing, 2014; paterson & higgs 2005; von zweck et al., 2008). when researchers meet multiple times with participants, it is helpful to prepare a summary following each conversation to encourage reflection, mutual questioning and the generation of additional questions to clarify the unfolding stories for each participant, a process which often results in richer data and new understandings of the participants’ experience (carson, 1986). photovoice photos and video can be used as a supplementary data collection method for participants to share contextual information, helping direct the conversations to critical, meaningful objects, moments and experiences. with the availability of cell phones worldwide, use of photovoice is a more vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 14 viable option for international researchers, especially if the research population is younger and located in urban areas with good cell phone connections. photos can reinforce memories from the setting and are useful where researchers do not need to capture elements of interactions. video may also be used in situations where preserving an interaction is important. regardless, attention needs to be given to the cultural appropriateness of data collection using photos or video. in addition, researchers need to be aware of potential ethical concerns with photos or video. this is a concern in international research where ethics protocols may be different, less developed or not exist at all in some locations. the photovoice process involves the selection of, and talking about, a small number of photos which the participant believes are most significant, using a series of questions based on the showed protocol to assist in taking a critical view of the stories portrayed through their photos (wang & burris 1997; wang, 1999). conversation flowing from these photos can serve as a means of engagement, empowerment, and a bridge to strengthen rapport, helping the participants and researcher get to know each other as they delve deeper into their inquiries (moules et al., 2015). this method of engaging with participants provides a visual stimulus which can lead to new questions that complement or diverge from those arising solely from the conversation. this process can lead to more fusions of horizon between researcher and participant and result in deeper understanding. for example, in the kenyan study, participants shared photos from their placement activities in a camp for internally displaced persons, a women’s group meeting in a rural community, and faith-based service organization in an urban slum. these images allowed the researcher and participant to attend to the community context in ways that would not have been possible without the photos. vivid images such as these can enhance hermeneutic writing, helping researchers reveal the diverse layers of the topic. when utilizing this method, information with basic photography tips can be provided during the recruitment process to review possible ethical concerns and identify ways to minimize possible risks to participants themselves or those in the photo when taking pictures for the research project. wang (1999) described how issues such as social class, access to power, and education have the potential to increase the sense of vulnerability of individuals that participants may wish to photograph. on the other hand, when participants are given control over what they photograph and which aspects of the photo they want to discuss or highlight in their conversations with researchers, this can be an empowering experience (o. bryanton, personal communication, may 24, 2017). an information sheet can also provide ideas of alternative ways to represent or portray their experience. if the researcher is providing the cameras, then this expense and funds for participant training needs to be built into the overall budget. focus group discussions focus groups may be used to establish relationships between the participants and the researcher, an option for international researchers who are looking for opportunities to engage with small groups of participants that they may have only recently met (moules et al., 2015). while some hermeneutic inquiries use conversational interviews with family members as a group, very few appear to take advantage of the benefits of a focus group to highlight the voices of participants (e.g., laing & moules, 2013). a focus group may generate deeper and richer data through a discussion of the topic between participants, allowing for additional fusions of horizons and vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 15 interpretations. for example, in the kenyan study, the participants were very keen to share and discuss their experiences of community-based learning with each other. this focus group was their first opportunity for peer sharing. listening to, and observing, the interactions among and between the individual participants was insightful for the researcher. opportunities for participants to reflect on and discuss their shared or unique aspects of their experience can potentially allow participants and researcher to reach a new fusion of horizons. in addition, researchers who are positioned as cultural outsiders may gain insights from focus group discussions where participants might only feel insiders would understand and would simply not think to talk about with an outsider. on the practical side, thought should be given to who will facilitate the focus group discussion, an issue for researchers who are cultural or linguistic outsiders. reflective journals and field notes a critical aspect of hermeneutic work is the reflexivity of the researcher engaged in their own reflective writing regarding the research process, personal learnings, or confusions as part of a personal process of turning around the topic (moules et al., 2015). a self-reflective grasp of the hermeneutic structure of the lived meaning of time is a difficult and often laborious task, involving a process of reflectively appropriating, clarifying, and making explicit the aspects of meaning of the experience (van manen, 2014). for international hermeneutic inquiries, a considerable amount of time needs to be dedicated to writing researcher’s reflective journals or field notes to document the myriad of background elements associated with the international context for the research. this is in addition to the typical notes, reflections, and observations from the conversations, questions that emerge from listening to recorded conversations, or points that come up during the focus group discussion. these include additional information such as vocal intonations and gestures of participants, notes related to the meeting context, or reflections and notes from reading or re-reading data. data interpretation and writing hermeneutic analysis encompasses more than the spoken words of the participants, and can include speaking, listening, sharing, questioning, and reflecting by the participants and researcher as they engage in a conversation about what their experience means to them. consequently, thorough preparation for field work and strong cross-cultural competence is essential. data analysis in hermeneutic inquiry starts as soon as data collection begins. we examine here issues related to the transcription of conversations, interpretation of data, and writing hermeneutically in an international context. transcription of conversations in hermeneutic research, decisions regarding the transcription process should be carefully documented in a researcher’s log to ensure consistency. assuring the accuracy and validity of transcripts is critical since the transcripts are not simply copies of the original conversation; they are interpretive and decontextualized (kvale, 1996). transcriber reliability and the interpretational character of transcription needs to be considered along with the layers of context that are documented in the transcribing process around features such as pauses, repetitions, and vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 16 tone of voice to interpret what is said or unsaid particularly in international research (kvale & brinkmann, 2009). participants at a distance could be offered the opportunity to discuss the transcript or summary via phone or skype instead of more traditional member check processes to ensure accuracy and clarity (kvale & brinkmann, 2009). there are those, however, that do not see a fit of any form of member checking with hermeneutics (see for e.g., moules et al., 2015). interpretation interpretation of the meaning of experiences occurs through a precise understanding of the social, cultural, and historical context (gadamer, 1960/1975). a systematic process of listening to conversations along with reading and re-reading conversation transcripts, summaries, field notes, and the researcher’s reflective journal helps to identify emergent themes from the data and establish naïve understanding of both the whole and parts. this initial phase in working toward a hermeneutic understanding of participants’ experiences is followed by writing about the context for each participant prior to presenting the meaning and understanding of their experience by situating his/her horizon. throughout the interpretative process, researchers need to take time to allow all the histories and voices to reveal themselves and have their say (jardine, graham, clifford, & friesen, 2002). it would be prudent for researchers to periodically revisit preparatory notes and readings to ensure that they remain sensitive to the international context of their research. as international researchers move further into data interpretation, deeper layers of understanding will be uncovered and they should remain vigilant to ensure that they remain conscious of the hermeneutical situation/position along with the cultural and historical context (gadamer, 1960/1975). listening to the recordings along with reflective writing while still in the field can help form (naïve) interpretations and uncover additional questions that need to be asked. as data analysis and interpretation continues, researchers should clearly acknowledge and remain open and sensitive to the various ways that their preunderstanding has and continues to influence their interpretations. writing hermeneutically in hermeneutic research, a researcher is a seeker of meaning. the purpose of hermeneutic inquiry is not to provide “information” or “solutions” in a technical sense, but to enhance our perspectives and provide pathic forms of understanding that are situational, relational, and enactive (van manen, 2014). therefore, hermeneutic writing reflects how philosophical and methodological perspectives are practiced in research and the process of presenting and making sense of human experiences. in other words, writing hermeneutically is not simply writing up conclusions or preparing a report at the end of inquiry, it is an engaging process with human existence in a linguistic form (gadamer, 2006). a hermeneutic writer does not present the reader with a conclusive argument or with a determinate set of ideas, essences, or insights. instead, he or she orientates the reader reflectively to participants’ experiences in recognizable form. hermeneutic research is a philosophical project, therefore, its writing needs to reflect the philosophical reflection on the world and the experiences being studied (van manen, 2006). thoughtful hermeneutic writing presents something familiar into profoundly unfamiliar and vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 17 touches the readers by the epiphany effect of its reflective engagement with prior experiences. the hermeneutic text brings readers in touch with the familiar experiences, resonates with the reflective being, and changes their understanding of the being through gaining new meanings from the text and experiences. hermeneutic inquiry-writing reflects the idea that no text is ever perfect, no interpretation is ever complete, no explication of meaning is ever final, and no insight is beyond challenge (moules et al., 2015; van manen & adams, 2010). during the writing process, a hermeneutic writer is situated in a solitary sphere and is profoundly affected by the infinite uncertainty and possibility presented in the text. the researcher steps back from the text to encounter the fundamental questions behind the naked human experiences, recognizing the limitation of human understanding, without completely stepping out of his or her social, historical, biographic being. in writing international hermeneutic research, a researcher considers the integration of the fundamental questions addressed in the study, the philosophical and interpretive traditions of hermeneutics, the linguistic and cultural differences as interpretive conditions and analysis of the data, and a deepened understanding of meanings and human experiences from comparative perspectives. a hermeneutic writer also moves through the hermeneutic circle to consider a particular topic in both international and local contexts. this is a challenging process, but one that supports broader interpretations through different lenses. our own research writing experiences confirm that it is sometimes challenging to find the indigenous terms or words that have equivalent english expressions or vice versa. therefore, it is always helpful for a researcher to adopt key indigenous words or phrases to achieve accurate interpretation. this writing process not only facilitates transnational conversations on the topic, but also allows the researcher to move in and out of the data and reflect the possibilities and limitations language creates in understanding and interpreting the meanings. conclusions as an interpretive methodology, hermeneutics allows an international researcher to gain deeper understanding and new perspectives on human experiences through interpreting text and highlighting the cultural, historical, philosophical, and linguistic characteristics of the research setting. therefore, it appeals to researchers in fields such as education, clinical psychology, criminology, legal studies, family sciences, nursing, and medicine. however, the unique philosophical legacy embedded in hermeneutics and the distinctive processes of interpretive writing combined with the challenges inherent with working in an international setting need to be faced head on by researchers who are interested in conducting hermeneutic inquiry in international settings. based on our experiences with two hermeneutic studies conducted in kenya and china, we present these ideas as signposts to guide hermeneutic inquiry, particularly for graduate students who are traversing the intersection of research design and international context. we examined philosophical, methodological, practical, and ethical issues a researcher needs to consider when designing and implementing a hermeneutic study in international settings. these considerations are not only practical for following hermeneutic traditions in international research, but also crucial for decolonizing research and knowledge through transnational conversations and collaborations. vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 18 references apple, m. w. (1982/2011). education and power (3rd ed.) new york, ny: routledge. appleton, c. (2011). ‘critical friends’, feminism and integrity: a reflection on the use of critical friends as a research tool to support researcher integrity and reflexivity in qualitative research studies. women in welfare education, 10, 1-13. baglin, m. r., & rugg, s. (2010). student nurses’ experiences of community-based practice placement learning: a qualitative exploration. nurse education in practice, 10(3), 144-152. baskerville, d., & goldblatt, h. (2009). learning to be a critical friend: from professional indifference through challenge to unguarded conversations. cambridge journal of education, 39(2), 205–221. doi: 10.1080/03057640902902260 beeman-cadwallader, n., quigley, c., & yazzie-mintz. t. (2011). enacting decolonized methodologies: the doing of research in educational communities. qualitative inquiry, 18(1), 315. caputo, j. d. (1987). radical hermeneutics: repetition, deconstruction and the hermeneutic project. bloomington, in: indiana university press. carson, t. (1986). closing the gap between research and practice: conversation as a mode of doing research. phenomenology & pedagogy, 4(2), 3-85. chowdhury, t. (2016, june 17). critical legal thinking hans-georg gadamer: hermeneutics. retrieved from http://criticallegalthinking.com/2016/06/17/hans-georg-gadamer-hermeneutics/ costa, a. l., & kallick, b. (1993). through the lens of a critical friend. educational leadership, 49-51. creswell, j. w. (2009). research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. los angeles, ca: sage. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. new york, ny: suny press. davey, n. (2017). philosophical hermeneutics and ontology. journal of the british society for phenomenology, 48(3), 179-185. doi:10.1080/00071773.2017.1303107 http://criticallegalthinking.com/2016/06/17/hans-georg-gadamer-hermeneutics/ vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 19 dei, g. j. s. (2012). indigenous anti-colonial knowledge as ‘heritage knowledge’ for promoting black/african education in diasporic contexts. decolonization: indigeneity, education & society, 1(1), 102-119. retrieved from http://decolonization.org/index.php/des/article/view/18631 dei, g. j. s., & asgharzadeh, a. (2001). the power of social theory: the anti-colonial discursive framework. the journal of educational thought (jet) / revue de la pensée éducative, 35(3), 297-323. retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23767242 feldman, a. (1999). the role of conversation in collaborative action research. educational action research, 7(1), 125-147. doi:10.1080/09650799900200076 fleet, k., & kitson, r. (2013). white women writing: two teachers as orang puteh in complex borderlands. reflective practice, 14(2), 288-304, doi:10.1080/14623943.2012.749230 freire, p. (1970). pedagogy of the oppressed. new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1975). truth and method. new york, ny: seabury press. gadamer, h-g. (1976). philosophical hermeneutics. berkley, ca: university of california press. gadamer, h-g. (2006). classical and philosophical hermeneutics. theory, culture & society, 23(1), 29 -56. giroux, h. (1983). theory and resistance in education: a pedagogy for the opposition. south hadley, ma: bergin and garvey. grondin, j. (2002). gadamer’s basic understanding of understanding. in r. j. dostal (ed.), the cambridge companion to gadamer (pp. 36-51). cambridge, uk: cambridge university press. guo, l. (2010). the meaning of curriculum reform for chinese teachers. saarbrücken, germany: lap publishing. habermas, j. (1971). knowledge and human interests. boston, ma: beacon press. hodge, p., & lester, j. (2006). indigenous research: whose priority? journeys and possibilities of cross-cultural research in geography. geographical research, 44(1), 41–51. jacobs, a. h. m. (2014). critical hermeneutics and higher education: a perspective on texts, meaning and institutional culture. south african journal of philosophy, 33(3), 297-310. doi:10.1080/02580136.2014.948327 jardine, d. w. (2006). on hermeneutics: over and above our wanting and doing. in k. tobin & j. kincheloe (eds.), doing educational research a handbook (pp. 261–288). boston, ma: sense. http://decolonization.org/index.php/des/article/view/18631 vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 20 jardine, d. w. (2016, november, 22). the more intense the practice, the more intense the demons: a few hermeneutic caveats [editorial]. journal of applied hermeneutics. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/136 jardine, d. w., graham, t., clifford, p., & friesen, s. (2002). in his own hand: interpretation and the effacing of the scribe. language and literacy, 4(1), 1-33. kinsella, e. a. (2006). hermeneutics and critical hermeneutics: exploring possibilities within the art of interpretation. forum qualitative sozialforschung / forum: qualitative social research, 7(3). retrieved from http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/145/319article 19. kinsella, e. a., bossers, a., & ferreira, d. (2008). enablers and challenges to international practice education: a case study. learning in health & social care, 7(2), 79–92. doi:10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00178.x kovach, m. (2009). indigenous methodologies: characteristics, conversations, and contexts. toronto, on, canada: university of toronto press. kovach, m. (2010). conversational method in indigenous research. first peoples child & family review, 5(1), 40–48. kvale, s. (1996). interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. thousand oaks, ca: sage. kvale, s., & brinkmann, s. (2009). interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. thousand oaks, ca: sage. laing, c. m. (2012). in play, at play. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 6. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/16 laing, c. m., & moules, n. j. (2013). the island of misfit toys. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 8. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/50 macquarrie, c. (2005). experiences in early stage alzheimer’s disease: understanding the paradox of acceptance and denial. aging and mental health: an international journal, 9(05), 1– 12. mccaffrey, g., raffin-bouchal, s., & moules, n. j. (2012). hermeneutics as research approach: a reappraisal. international journal of qualitative methods, 11(3), 214–229. mccaffery, g., & moules, n. (2016). encountering the great problems in the street: enacting hermeneutic philosophy as research in practice disciplines. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 1. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/106/pdf_1 http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/136 http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/16 http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/50 http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/106/pdf_1 vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 21 malpas, j. (2014). hans-georg gadamer. in e. n. zalta (ed.), stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (fall 2014 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gadamer/ moules, n. j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes. an ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods, 1(3), 1–21. moules, n. j., field, j. c., mccaffrey, j. p., & laing, c.m. (2014). conducting hermeneutic research: the address of the topic. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 7. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/66 moules, n. j., mccaffrey, j. p., field, j. c., & laing, c. m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. ndimande, b.s. (2012). decolonizing research in post-apartheid south africa: the politics of methodology. qualitative inquiry, 18(3), 215–226. newberry, m. a. (2012). social work and hermeneutic phenomenology. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 14. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/40 ovens, m. (2014). the use of hermeneutics in the criminological interpretation of forensic documents: a case study. journal of psychology in africa, 23(4), 661–667. paterson, m., & higgs, j. (2005). using hermeneutics as a qualitative research approach in professional practice. qualitative report, 10(2), 339–357. patton, m. q. (2015). qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). los angeles, ca: sage. porter, s., & robinson, j. c. (2011). hermeneutics: an introduction to interpretive theory. grand rapids, mi: wm. b. erdmans publishing. ramberg, b., & gjesdal, k. (2013). hermeneutics. in e. n. zalta (ed.), stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2013). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hermeneutics/ ricoeur, p. (1981). hermeneutics and the human sciences: essays on language, action and interpretation (j.b. thompson, trans.). cambridge, uk: cambridge university press. simmons, m., & dei, j. s. (2012). reframing anti-colonial theory for the diasporic context. postcolonial directions in education, 1(1), 67–99. smith, d. g. (2003). the mission of the hermeneutic scholar. in m. wolfe, & c. pryor (eds.), the mission of the scholar research and practice: a tribute to nelson haggerson (pp. 183 – 200). new york, ny: peter lang. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gadamer/ http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/66 http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/40 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hermeneutics/ vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 22 smith, l. t. (1999). decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. dunedin, new zealand: zed books. smithers graeme, c. (2013). indigenous health research and the non-indigenous researcher: a proposed framework for the autoethnographic methodological approach. pimatisiwin: a journal of aboriginal and indigenous community health, 11(3), 513-520. smithers graeme, c., & mandawe, e. (2017). indigenous geographies: research as reconciliation. the international indigenous policy journal, 8(2), article 2. doi: 10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.2 stelmach, b. (2009). research or in-search? a non-aboriginal researcher’s retrospective of a study on aboriginal parent involvement. first nations perspectives, 2(1), 35-56. stephens, d. (2009). qualitative research in international settings. london, uk: routledge/falmer. stephens, d. (2012). the role of culture in interpreting and conducting research. in a. r. j. briggs, m. coleman, & m. morrison (eds.) research methods in educational leadership & management (pp 46-60). london, uk: sage. tan, h., wilson, a., & olver, i. (2009). ricoeur's theory of interpretation: an instrument for data interpretation in hermeneutic phenomenology. international journal of qualitative methods, 8(4), 1–15. vanleeuwen, c. a., guo-brennan, l., & weeks, l.e. (2017, june). what learning in the community means for kenyan university students: a hermeneutic inquiry into international community service-learning. graduate research recognition day, university of prince edward island, charlottetown, pe. van manen, m. (2006). writing qualitatively, or the demands of writing. qualitative health research, 16(5), 713–722. van manen, m. (2014). phenomenology of practice: meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. walnut creek, ca: left coast press. van manen, m., & adams, c. a. (2010). phenomenology. in p. peterson, e. baker, & b. mcgaw (eds.) international encyclopedia of education. vol. 6 (3rd ed.). oxford, uk: elsevier. von zweck, c., paterson, m., & pentland, w. (2008). the use of hermeneutics in a mixed methods design. the qualitative report, 13(1), 116–134. wa thiong’o, n. (1986). decolonizing the mind: the politics of language in african literature. portsmouth, uk: heinemann educational. vanleeuwen et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2017 article 7 23 wang, c. c., & burris, m. a. (1997). photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. health education and behaviour, 24(3) 369–387. wang, c. c. (1999). photovoice: a participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. journal of women’s health, 8(2), 185–192. corresponding author: emily p. williams university of calgary werklund school of education email: emily.williams@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 22, 2018 the author(s) 2018 not quite this and not quite that: anorexia nervosa, counselling psychology, and hermeneutic inquiry in a tapestry of ambiguity emily p. williams, shelly russell-mayhew, nancy j. moules, & gina dimitropoulos abstract as a group of researchers exploring how to best understand the complex topic of families discovering their loved one has anorexia nervosa (an), we found that we had to weave ambiguity into our design. embracing ambiguity allowed us to create a tapestry that acknowledges the ambiguity of an, counselling psychology (and other helping professions), and hermeneutic inquiry. in fact, the “not quite this and not quite that” features of these three constructs emerged as the thread that holds the inquiry together. we review the topic of an through a lens of ambiguity. further, we position both the field of counselling psychology and the research method of hermeneutic inquiry as compatible frameworks in the study of an, in both practice and research. by acknowledging, and at times even embracing, ambiguity, we respect the complexity of the situation we are studying. keywords ambiguity, anorexia nervosa, hermeneutic inquiry, counselling psychology discovery is an objective of research and practice. this is also true of us; as authors, we are in the process of discovery. we seek to reveal, unveil, un-conceal a topic that is unknown, making discovery challenging and ambiguous. central to any process of discovery is the concept of aletheia, a greek term describing some act of uncovering and opening pieces of understanding, at the expense of covering and closing others (moules, 2002). the particulars of a topic are both williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 2 exposed and hidden from us at the same time. while we pursue the truth, we are always one step behind, never able to capture the whole essence in our understanding. the term aletheia has multiple meanings. the first means to open, or to find a portal of understanding (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015). in terms of discovery, we must look for questions that will open our understanding or opportunity to learn about the topic in its complexity. second, aletheia contains the word lethe, referring to the mythical river of hades that was said to cause forgetfulness when crossed (online etymology dictionary, n.d.). aletheia is the opposite of forgetting, thus, while discovering, we must remember what has been forgotten. the third understanding of aletheia comes from the opposite of the word lethal; it is about bringing to life what was taken for granted, what was dead, or what was assumed about the topic (moules et al., 2015). evidently, aletheia captures an ambivalence about what we have to forfeit in order to see something else; we must make a wager with what we are willing to give up in order to better understand or discover. in this paper, we offer the argument that ambiguity is not something to be feared or fixed, but instead allows researchers and practitioners, particularly those specializing in the treatment of anorexia nervosa (an), to be as effective as possible. our topic of inquiry, an examination of the experience of families discovering that their child has an, does not sit comfortably in one place. it does not have a permanent home in prevention, treatment, psycho-education, or stigma management; nor does it have a place with any single member of the family. moreover, the discipline of psychology that we (first and second author) are from is commonly mistaken for something that it is not. the nature of counselling psychology is not recognized by many and is still in some ways (and maybe always) in development. in addition to the complexity of these factors, the research approach we will utilize is arguably difficult and abstract; hermeneutic inquiry attends to history, interrelatedness, dialogue, language, and the possibility that we will be forever changed from understanding our topic, while at the same time noting that our understanding can never be complete (gadamer, 2013). as we explored a research topic that involved an, counselling psychology, and hermeneutic inquiry, we came to understand that we needed first to address the concept of ambiguity to better prepare for our research. the solution to ambiguity is to not solve it. ambiguity is a part of the process of research and of being a practitioner, allowing us to better understand the topic or the person in front of us. this is especially true when ambiguity is deeply ingrained in our topic, field, and research method. by welcoming ambiguity into research and practice, we remain open to possibilities and differences and are able to attend to the complexities of the phenomenon. ambiguity ambiguity refers to understanding a concept, word, or expression in two or more ways (merriam-webster, n.d.). ever changing, shifting, unknowing, wavering, ambiguity refers to a concept with more than one meaning, and more than one interpretation. first used in the 1500s, the latin term ambiguus coming from the term ambigere meaning “to dispute about, contend, debate” (online etymology dictionary, n.d.), is made up of the prefix ambi meaning “both” or undecided and agere meaning "to drive" (merriam-webster, n.d.). uncertainty, doubt, and hesitation are sewn together, closely stitched to the concept of ambiguity, all pointing to the tendency to wander, waver, and change. ambiguous concepts are not of poorer quality nor better williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 3 than concepts that have known truths or are easy to decipher, but rather lend themselves well to interpretation through multiple lenses, perspectives, and fields of inquiry. throughout the paper, we argue that ambiguity does not need to be solved. ambiguity might have something to teach us; we can grow in our understanding and be changed by the process of creating space for ambiguity. instead of running from, fighting against, or trying to solve ambiguity, we must welcome multiplicity and constant change as concepts that will lead to better understanding. first, we will describe an and the mystery and inconsistency that surrounds the disclosure, recognition, diagnosis, treatment, and recovery processes. it is our intention that, by synthesizing the literature, we illustrate the ambiguity and ambivalence inherent for individuals and families affected. further, we will position our research question: how might we understand the experiences of parents who have discovered they have a child living with anorexia nervosa? (research question of first author’s doctoral dissertation) as not having a home in one field or another; leaving us as researchers wondering how to proceed in grey areas rather than having a black and white forward moving path. thus, as a research team preparing to embark on a novel, discovery mission, we needed to create space for the complexities and richness of experiences inherent within the topic before collecting data. this complexity and richness can be likened to a tightly woven tapestry, one made up of many strings of different understandings, experiences, perspectives, biases – essentially, a tapestry honouring ambiguity. next, a discussion about counselling psychology within a canadian context is provided. within this discussion, the multiple interpretations of what this profession is and what counselling psychologists actually do are emphasized. last, hermeneutic inquiry is introduced and described as a method that is not quite this, nor that, but rather a method that is comfortable working with topics that are in the inbetween. further, since understanding the history and tradition of a phenomenon is fundamental to hermeneutic inquiry, throughout the paper brief histories of topics will be offered. overall, we seek to weave the string of ambiguity throughout each section and also call attention to the spaces in between the stitches, illustrating and sewing together the ambiguity and unknown in various fields. together, this stitch work contributes to the larger tapestry, acknowledging ambiguity as a resource for research and practice. by highlighting the ambiguous thread throughout, we are creating space for the ambiguity, creating space for the uncertainty inherent in all areas. we do so not to suggest we solve this, but rather accept all areas as not quite this and not quite that and allow ourselves to explore and understand the uncertainty rather than avoid it. evidently, our research process is a discovery, the same way that the topic is discovered. ambiguity and anorexia nervosa the overall experience of having an is marked with nuances, nebulosity, and ambivalence (ryan & callaghan, 2014; williams & reid, 2010). weaving in and out of grey areas is cause for concern for many practitioners providing treatment to individuals with an (adlam, 2015; george, thornton, touyz, waller, & beumont, 2004) and is troublesome for those in support and caregiver roles, including family members and friends (craigie, hope, tan, stewart, & mcmillan, 2013; voriadaki, simic, espie, & eisler, 2015). evidently, ambiguity is not solely felt by the individual with an, but also takes up space in the lives of professional helpers, care givers, and families. the ambiguous nature of an will be illustrated through a discussion of a) the history of an; b) the ambivalence often reported towards an; c) when the disorder is williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 4 somehow discovered; d) the complicated recognition process, and e) the inconsistent outcomes for those with an. at all points throughout the course of an, ambiguity is not far away, it is not separate from the experience but rather a part of it. history of anorexia: the hysterical female we begin with a brief history of an, the first eating syndrome to be described by physicians in the 1870s (gull, 1874; lasèque, 1873). broken down, the prefix an translates to “without” and orexis means “appetite,” therefore in full translating into “lack of appetite” (merriam-webster, n.d.). the history of the conceptualization of an is full of fascination and allure specific to the era, adding obscurity to the term’s construction by medical professionals of the last several centuries. researchers examining the archives of hospitals and mental asylums from the 16th to 19th centuries established notable accounts of fasting women and varied explanations of the disorder (habermas, 2015; parry-jones, 1985). the varied conceptualizations seem to be due to nationality and era. french physician, lasègue, introduced the term anorexie hystérique in 1873, then one year later the term anorexia nervosa was coined by british physician, gull, in 1874 (habermas, 2015). differences in conceptualizations stemmed from the french tradition of paying greater attention to psychological aspects of the condition, whereas british traditions emphasized the physical and behavioural features (habermas, 2015). french conceptualization. french physician, lasègue described the condition in terms of hysteria, noting that his female patients had afflictions of the mind, suffering from “some emotion which she avows or conceals” (1873/1997, p. 493). lasègue described the syndrome eventually becoming the sole object of preoccupation and portrayed his patients with an as hysterical: what dominates in the mental condition of the hysterical patient is, above all, the state of quietude-i might almost say a condition of contentment truly pathological. not only does she not sigh for recovery, but she is not ill-pleased with her condition, notwithstanding all the unpleasantness it is attended with. in comparing this satisfied assurance to the obstinacy of the insane, i do not think i am going too far. (p. 495) british conceptualization. in 1874 (adapted and reprinted in 1997), gull published a piece on a peculiar condition characterized by extreme emaciation, which he referred to a disease that occurred mostly in young females. gull used phrases such as “complete anorexia for animal food, and almost complete anorexia for everything else” (p. 498) in his description of a former patient. in addition to describing his patients’ physical states in his case studies, gull made bold remarks regarding the treatment and lack of consideration of the patient’s desires in her treatment. he made clear the dangers of continued starvation and noted that “the inclination of the patient must be in no way consulted” (p. 500). further, gull spoke to the destructive mental states of the women he treated, referring to young females being “specifically obnoxious to mental perversity” (p. 501) and females with this syndrome not being of sound mind to make their own choices about caloric consumption. williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 5 since the time of these physicians’ early writings of an, others have gone beyond descriptions of lack of appetite and hysteria by describing distinctive features such as addiction to extreme thinness, referred to as a “drive towards emaciation” (selvini palazzoli, 1963/1974), and relentless pursuits of thinness (bruch, 1965). clearly, the evolution of these descriptors throughout the 19th and 20th century point to how an has been disputed throughout history, and how many of these disputes continue in present among medical and mental health professionals. our understanding of an has evolved over time. as more is understood about the development and trajectory of an, the conceptualization will be modified to meet the time period and be congruent with modern practices and theory. regardless of this changing and ambiguous identification process for what constitutes an, questions still remain: what happens next for someone with an? how do they experience an? ambivalence to one’s experiences of anorexia nervosa not only is the history of an marked with contestation, but so is the experience of living with the disorder including one’s will to recover and autonomous motivations regarding an (nordbø, espeset, gulliksen, skårderud, geller, & holte, 2012). anorexia nervosa is considered to involve greater ambiguity and ambivalence compared to other eating disorders (e.g., bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder), and individuals with an tend to appreciate their symptoms differently than other groups experiencing mental illness (nordbø, espeset, gulliksen, skårderud, & holte, 2006). ego-syntonicity, referring to states, thoughts, behaviours, or feelings that are congruent with one’s self-concept, and ambivalence are central features of an (marzola, abbate-daga, gramaglia, amianto, & fassino, 2015). according to qualitative inquiries, some individuals have little desire to make changes, as an is a source of pride and endurance providing a sense of achievement and self-confidence (nordbø et al., 2006; robinson, kukucska, guidetti, & leavey, 2015). further, researchers have illustrated how individuals with an often depict their an as providing them with a sense of security and stability, a way to avoid negative experiences, and as a way of obtaining a sense of power and inner sense of mastery and strength (nordbø et al., 2006). at the same time, there are also individuals who are ambivalent about the disorder, not sure whether the an controls them or whether they are in control of it, and irresolute if they wish to recover or maintain it (colton & pistrang, 2004; reid, burr, williams, & hammersley, 2008; williams & reid, 2010). some individuals with an regard their symptoms as a set of behaviours that are meaningful and positive in their lives (nordbø et al., 2006), whereas others are ambivalent, only at times wishing to rid themselves of their restrictive eating behaviours and/or weight loss routines and resume the life they once lived (williams & reid, 2010). much like the ambivalence regarding one’s feelings toward their an, individuals also vary in how they wish to proceed in the course of their experience with an. some may decide to disclose and ask for help, whereas others might not. evidently, the experience of an is individual and widely varied and, as such, an ambiguous quality emerges. disclosure of anorexia nervosa intentional and planned disclosure is the process of letting one’s self be known to others (corrigan & rao, 2012). individuals with an may intentionally come forward, verbally sharing information about their eating and weight related behaviours. however, it is also possible that williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 6 disclosures happen against the will of the person with an (i.e., those who are caught purging). being caught is not the same as making a willful decision to share intimate details with others. conversely, people close to the person with an may begin to suspect ill health and perhaps disordered eating when the size of an individual’s body begins to unquestionably decrease or uncharacteristic eating and exercise habits are exhibited. individuals communicating online via websites specifically created for those with eating disorders have reported feeling “too far gone” to continue concealing their illness from others (williams, russell-mayhew, & ireland, in press). this account supports a third type of disclosure, one that is neither intentional nor accidental, but rather an act of defeat, like one has lost his or her power over the eating disorder. individuals struggling with an are often hesitant to disclose they have a problem (becker et al., 1999). researchers have suggested that disclosing one has an eating disorder is a gateway for receiving professional help (gilbert et al., 2012), however, it is more complex since the process of disclosure is characterized by ambiguity, for all parties involved. disclosure unfolds over time (williams et al., in press), opening up the possibility that it can resemble an entirely unique experience for everyone who discloses an, and for everyone who is on the receiving end of that disclosure. hence, perhaps a better term for this disclosure process is discovery, meaning to “obtain sight or knowledge of for the first time” (merriam-webster, n.d.). discover was first used in the 1300s and meant to “divulge, reveal, disclose” (online etymology dictionary, n.d.). from the old french term descovrir meaning to “uncover, unroof, unveil, reveal, betray,” and from the late latin discooperire, dismeaning “opposite of” and -cooperire meaning “to cover up,” the term conveys an undertone of betrayal or malicious exposure. in the 1550s, discoverer originally meant “informant” (online etymology dictionary, n.d.), thus the etymology of the word maps well to the experience of one’s an being discovered by others, whether this was intentional or not. ambiguity of an recognition after a discovery, sometimes a long, complicated, and ambiguous process of recognition and assessment follows. factors contributing to this process include differentiating between other medical conditions and symptoms mimicking malnourishment (schwarz, ponder, & feller, 2009), late-onset eating disorders (santonastaso, camporese, caregaro, & favaro, 2008), and atypical cases (american psychiatric association, 2013; forney, brown, holland-carter, kennedy, & keel, 2017). recognition can be made challenging and go unnoticed for a number of reasons including unintentional denial, comprised of the individual with an having impaired self-awareness and reality distortions (vandereycken & van humbeeck, 2008). there may also be deliberate denial about symptoms and minimization that anything is wrong, which may occur as an expression of avoidance and fear of the consequences (gray, murray, & eddy, 2015; vandereycken & van humbeeck, 2008). some practitioners go as far as to say that those with an do not wish to be diagnosed or have their an be recognized, because they do not wish to be treated (adlam, 2015; cooper, 2005; halmi, 2005). based on physicality alone, the prototypic individual with an presents as malnourished and emaciated (gray et al., 2015), yet just because there is a prototypic patient does not make the recognition of an any easier as there can be multiple reasons for weight loss. also adding to the ambiguous nature of recognition or assessment is that the behaviours and thoughts of someone with an fall along the same spectrum williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 7 of behaviours and thoughts that the majority of western females have, that is a preoccupation with shape and weight (tantleff-dunn, barnes, & larose, 2011). various practitioners including brown and jasper (1993), neumark-sztainer, levine, paxton, smolak, piran, and wertheim (2006), russell-mayhew (2007), and sundgot‐borgen and torstveit, (2010) have argued for a continuum of weight and body preoccupation. brown and jasper (1993) proposed that it was not accurate to stigmatize an as “individual pathologies or diseases, at the same time we approve, even praise, the behaviour of those women who exercise and diet to attain the culturally prescribed body ideal” (p. 54). brown and jasper (1993) offered that it is difficult to suggest that someone who meets the diagnostic criteria of an is any more pathological than someone who diets and engages in a rigid exercise routine for the purpose of controlling shape and weight. feeling negatively towards one’s body is a similar experience for women engaging in eating disorders and those dieting, as women internalize the ideal body image, recognizing that how they look will reflect how they are valued and treated (brown & jasper, 1993; malson & burns, 2009). a wide range of eating and weight related issues exist on a spectrum, ranging from negative body image and shape concerns to significantly distressing eating disorders such as an and bulimia nervosa (levine & smolak, 2006; neumark-sztainer, 2005; russell-mayhew, 2007). in this vein then, the ambiguity presents itself when behaviours that are considered normal, even virtuous, go too far. often, individuals with an report a sense of self-confidence and feelings of worthiness after they have lost weight (nordbø et al., 2006). in addition, individuals reported receiving positive feedback from others related to their shape and weight upon initially losing weight (nordbø et al., 2006). therefore, it is not surprising that these same individuals would experience tensions between the way they feel in their bodies after having lost weight and others conveying that they are concerned for them. hence, the ambiguity must be endured by both the individuals with an and the practitioners who are tasked with recognition. apparently not everyone in these situations share the same perspectives and at times might be in direct tension with the other (vandereycken & van humbeeck, 2008). hence, the string of ambiguity continues to weave through, for both individuals experiencing an and practitioners involved. there are multiple perspectives and positions in recognizing an, emphasizing how this process in not black or white. clear cut ways of recognizing that one is experiencing an are not available; we must honour the ambiguity and hold space for all these positions so the tension and contestation are visible. anorexia nervosa outcome variability treatment outcomes for an are inconsistent, and of limited success for select individuals (steinhausen, 2008). though treatment for an often temporarily succeeds in weight restoration, these individuals are considered to be at high risk for early relapse (carter et al., 2012; khalsa et al., 2017). the limited success in treating an is not the fault of individuals with an, rather perhaps an issue of not having yet found a treatment that works well for all. according to the most exhaustive reviews of treatment outcomes of an to date, among surviving patients 37% reach full recovery within four years after the disorder onset, 33% improved, and 20-25% developed a chronic course of an (berkman, lohr, & bulik, 2007; steinhausen, 2002). the crude mortality rate is reportedly 5-9%, which is accounted for by suicide or medical williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 8 complications from starvation or compensatory behaviours (berkman et al., 2007; steinhausen, 2002). thus, according to our knowledge of the course of an, particularly the course following treatment, reaching the recovery status is not cut and dry. the sense that one has to balance or somehow operate in ambiguous territory is not unique to those with an, their family members, or those professionally working with this group. experiencing uncertainty or multiple ways to go about something is also inherent in various practicing professions. one of these fields is counselling psychology, where multiplicity is the norm, creating space for ambiguity to flourish. as we move throughout this process of discovery, we intend to illustrate our position and entrance into this topic by framing it in terms of the ambiguity we, and other professionals, face as we work and study with those with an, but also the ambiguity that will be inherent in our practice because of our background. by doing so, we will illustrate using counselling psychology as an exemplar that there is another shade of grey, another realm of uncertainty, and another uneven stitch of the string of ambiguity. we can identify that ambiguity is involved in both an and counselling psychology separately. we must also acknowledge that the entire process that comes between an emerging and interacting with counselling psychology professionals is ambiguous and uncertain in itself. first, families go through an ambiguous process in determining how to respond to this discovery, who to seek help from, how to interact with other family members. families seek out counselling psychologists likely in the hopes that their ambiguity will be resolved by the counselling psychologist, only for an entirely new environment fraught with ambiguity to be presented to them. yet, this ambiguity is necessary if we are to truly embrace and honour each individual seeking treatment. families with children with an seek out treatment (i.e., counselling psychologists) to avoid ambiguity, to get clear answers, to help their child get better, whereas counselling psychologists make space for ambiguity, because they do not strive to fix ambiguous states; rather, they operate within them. the profession of counselling psychology is comprised of many fixtures, and this intricate make up of responsibilities – sometimes a mixture of not quite this nor that, and/or sometimes “both this and that,” certainly does not make ambiguity go away. hence, one door to ambiguity closes when families choose to seek professional help within a particular discipline, only for a completely new door to ambiguity to open when this same family interacts with a counselling psychologist. ambiguity and counselling psychology the contestations and uncertainty towards what exactly counselling psychology (cp) is has been well documented (bedi et al., 2011; bedi, sinacore, & chistiani, 2016). the fact that cp has been recognized in canada as a specialized discipline within the field of applied psychology since 1987, yet only received a formal definition in 2009, speaks to the equivocality of the profession’s apparent “distinctive identity” (bedi et al., 2011, p. 128). it is no wonder that counselling psychologists face uncertainty when positioning their training and approach to psychology as different compared to other psychology specialties and maybe even other professions, as up until nine years ago counselling psychologists were not united in their understanding of what cp stood for and its philosophical frameworks. in order to better understand the complexity, it is helpful to trace the history of cp in a canadian context, allowing us to review its evolution and multifaceted approach. during our discussion of cp, it may be williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 9 helpful to think of the profession as comprised as both this and that, hovering in-between various specialties. history of counselling psychology in canada to understand cp’s emergence in canada, one also has to be cognizant of the profession’s status at the same time south of the border. in the united states, cp was recognized as a distinct discipline by the american psychological association in 1951 (munley, duncan, & mcdonnel, 2004). due to this history and early recognition, cp in the united states was and is firmly embedded within professional psychology and is better understood to be a distinct specialization. counselling psychology in canada on the other hand, emerged years later in the late 1980s and was pioneered by professionals who were trained as either professional counsellors or psychologists (lalande, 2004). given this later emergence, the history of cp in canada is intertwined with professionals who would not be considered to be part of psychology disciplines or cp in the united states. a field that initially narrowly focused on guidance and career counselling (robertson & borgen, 2016) has undergone a transformation where an applied psychology specialization emerged from the roots. the evolution of cp in canada has certainly added to the ambiguity, leaving individuals wondering if counselling psychologists primarily assist individuals with softer life transitions (e.g., career transitions), rather than more serious concerns (e.g., eating disorders), or both. eating disorders, and an in particular, are considered anything but soft, therefore individuals wonder if a field traditionally focused in career and guidance has a place in the treatment of the most fatal mental illness (arcelus, mitchell, wales, & nielsen, 2011; keel et al., 2003). this tension becomes especially obvious after reviewing the history of the field. ultimately, cp struggles to find its home. the string of ambiguity continues to be finely stitched throughout, as multiple interpretations and understandings of what cp is, act as the foundation of which the field is based. counselling psychology and anorexia nervosa counselling psychologists offer a broad array of services to their communities and the world beyond. counselling psychologists across canada focus on client strengths. an emphasis is placed on (a) respecting diversity, (b) social justice for those who are marginalized, (c) mental wellness versus psychopathology, (d) psychoeducation, (e) assisting with successful transitions throughout life, and (f) applied research (bedi et al., 2011). it is clear that cp holds elements that are not quite this and not quite that and both this and that. counselling psychology conceptualizes individuals in terms of wellness, however the same professionals may also diagnosis a client with a label indicating psychopathology (bedi et al., 2011). this represents a tension within the field, one that is especially relevant to counselling psychologists working with individuals with an. dominant discourses about an come from a psycho-medical model, suggesting an is an internalized, traditionally female phenomenon (botha, 2015). if a clinician working from this model assigned a diagnosis, critics would suggest that, by doing so, the individual being treated would carry around a stigmatizing label as pathological (botha, 2015). while receiving a diagnosis of an may lead to an individual being accepted into a specialized service, considered by some to be what that individual requires for medical reasons, other counselling psychologists may be conflicted in assigning this label as it contradicts working from williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 10 a wellness perspective. these conflicts are important to consider when honoring the ambiguity in cp, as cp welcomes strength based conceptualizations, while also valuing assessment, diagnosis, and evidenced based treatment, all of which are linked to the medical model. thus, the tension is not solved, nor does it have to be. rather, we must be aware of this contestation within the field (and other helping professions). when the theme of ambiguity runs so deep through a phenomenon and a field, it is necessary to find a way to welcome differences and multiple interpretations. ambiguity and hermeneutics hermeneutic inquiry, most simply put, is focused on interpreting phenomena and experience within the world. interpretation refers to when an unknown or apparently unfamiliar meaning is made comprehensible (grondin, 1994). hermeneutic inquiry has been described as a “practice and theory of interpretation and understanding in human contexts” (moules et al., 2015, p. 3). rather than being driven by a rigid set of methodical rules dictating a pre-determined step-bystep method, hermeneutics offers a philosophy for understanding the world and is substantively driven (moules et al., 2015). described by caputo (2015), hermeneutic inquiry does not apply principles or rules of understanding to cases, because this would imply that the topic and cases within it being studied are common and pre-determined. rather, hermeneutics offers a way of proceeding in one’s understanding by being led by the topic. therefore, philosophical traditions cultivated over the last 2000 years guide hermeneutic research and practice. applying hermeneutics to applied practice is difficult to put one’s finger on – it is not quite this and not quite that. for hermeneutic inquiry, this ambiguity and openness to possibilities is not considered a problem or a down fall of the approach to understanding, but rather this resistance to categorization is an asset (moules et al., 2015). in the same sense that hermeneutics is difficult to categorize, no two people’s experiences with an are the same. though an is a categorization of an eating disorder, the factors comprising one’s experience of this disorder are infinite. the variance and ambiguity grows exponentially greater in the recognition, disclosure, assessment, treatment, and recovery processes of an. the feeling that one can never quite get a ha ndle on an parallels that of hermeneutics, as the topic of inquiry in hermeneutics is impossible to fully understand and see in its totality. hermeneutics requires a tolerance, even an embracing, of uncertainty, both of the topic and interpretation (moules et al., 2015). to look for possible meanings and understandings of the topic requires one to oscillate within a world of uncertainty and mystery. this ambiguous oscillation parallels how practitioners working with, and family members supporting those with, an must navigate their daily experiences – living in a world that is unknown to them, trying to do the best they can with little direction. as gadamer noted, “the true locus of hermeneutics is this in-between” (2013, p. 306). hermeneutics is not quite this and not quite that, as it is a philosophy and an applied practice. hermeneutic inquiry is capable of, and comfortable with, studying something that may never be fully understood, and the same could be said of a practitioner working with, or a researcher studying one’s experience of an, or a family’s experience of discovering their child or sibling williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 11 has an. the concept of aletheia, the process of uncovering pieces of understanding, at the expense of closing others is very much alive in situations involving ambiguous topics. in order to be open to discovery, we must have the ability to encounter the other or the topic in a way that we acknowledge that our understanding is limited and in need of a reworking (moules et al., 2015). therefore, in order to discover this topic, and to do so with integrity, hermeneutic work: lies in its ability to hold tension, to be “not quite this and not quite that,” in recognizing that with every opening, there is a closing of something else, in knowing that openings are invitations and portals to understanding, not dark rabbit holes where the topic disappears. (moules et al., 2015, p. 179) this quotation illustrates how we must honour the ambiguity inherent in the experience of having an, and in a family’s experience of discovering their loved one has an. in order to discover, we must be flexible when encountering others’ truths and accounts of the topic, and be open to the possibility that we may be changed in the process. creating space for ambiguity openness to ambiguity and not pushing it away may be uncomfortable, but when we are able to do this, it could lead to better research and practice. it is natural to seek clear answers, as certainty helps with decisions about what to do next. yet, we may take things for granted and act before considering all possibilities when something is clear-cut, and thought of as either this way or that way. when we take pieces of the situation for granted, we start to overlook details, narrowing our considerations for lessons and perspectives that might surprise us. openness and the ability to work in the grey areas, creating space for different perspectives and different disciplines is advantageous. the solution to ambiguity is not to solve it, in fact, the solution is to do nothing to fix it or make it clear. rather, in the spirit of aletheia, we must be open to the tradeoff of concealing some pieces for the benefit of uncovering others, when discovering a topic, or understanding it more deeply. evidently, the experience of an is marked with ambiguity. for adults, there is no best course of treatment for an and certainly not a clear prognosis (hubert lacy & sly, 2015; steinhausen, 2008). further, the recognition of an adds more complexity; given that many females living in a western society strive for the thin-ideal, there is a fine line between behaviour that is virtuous, or too far gone. evidenced by the high mortality rate and inconsistent recovery statistics ( arcelus, mitchell, wales, & nielsen, 2011; berkman et al., 2007; keel & brown, 2010), an can be likened to an unevenly dispersed thread, a thread with variously spaced stitches, and even at times a stitch that appears to have stopped before it was expected. interdisciplinary teams must be included in this fight, involving medical doctors, psychologists, social workers, nurses, nutritionists, dietitians, et cetera (american psychiatric association [apa], 2010). though counselling psychologists would be ready to take up arms and use their holistic treatment approach, other professionals may question their place. counselling psychologists are not limited to a specific type of inquiry, nor are bound to examining solely treatment related phenomenon. further, the not quite this nor that placement of cp mirrors our research topic, as the study of a family’s discovery that their child or sibling has an is not quite considered treatment, nor prevention, or psychoeducation. williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 12 given the ambiguity, hermeneutic inquiry is a fit to study the uncertainty that is certain with an and within the field of cp. hermeneutics takes history and tradition of a topic into consideration, carefully trying to understand how the topic in its present form has evolved since its beginning. further, the qualitative approach of hermeneutic inquiry is welcomed by counselling psychologists, who wish to discover the world and are open to multiple interpretations, not bound exclusively by quantitative methods. this openness to multiplicity and the possibility of one’s perspective being changed in the process of understanding mirrors how practitioners must hold space for ambiguity. by holding space, not trying to solve for the ambiguity, we can learn from it and possibly grow. conclusion an openness to working with the unknown is the key to working with individuals with an. when discovering a topic, especially one marked by so many uncertainties and multiple interpretations, we must make a “hermeneutic wager” (kearney, 2010) – taking a risk on an uncertain outcome, hoping we might better understand. in order to better understand the experiences of families discovering their child has an and to learn more generally what it might be like for someone living with an, we must be open to stepping into unknown territory and resist the urge to make our surroundings neater or more put together. by acknowledging the ambiguity inherent in one’s experience of an, we respect the complexity of the situation. by conceptualizing the many moving parts at play within this complex situation, as a tapestry of ambiguity, we reveal and hold space for interwoven complexities. by acknowledging, we are not solving for, nor are we tiptoeing around it, but rather as we honour ambiguity, we come to accept that it is not quite this, nor that, and that is okay. perhaps it is even a resource. references adlam, j. (2015). refusal and coercion in the treatment of severe anorexia nervosa: the antigone paradigm. psychodynamic practice, 21, 19-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2014.989714 aletheia. (n.d.). online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=alethea ambiguity. (n.d.). merriam webster’s online dictionary. retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ambiguity ambiguous. (n.d.). online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=ambiguity american psychiatric association [apa] (2010). practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders (3rd ed.). washington dc: authors. american psychiatric association [apa] (2013). diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). arlington, va: authors. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2014.989714 http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=alethea https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ambiguity http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=ambiguity williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 13 anorexia. (n.d.). merriam webster’s online dictionary. retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anorexia becker, a.e., grinspoon, s.k., kilbanski, a., & herzog, d.b (1999). eating disorders. north england journal of medicine, 340, 1092-1098. doi: 10.1056/nejm199904083401407 bedi, r.p., haverkamp, b.e., beatch, r., cave, d.g., domene, j.f., harris, g.e., & mikhail, a.m. (2011). counselling psychology in a canadian context: definition and description. canadian psychology/psychologie canadienne, 52, 128. doi: 10.1037/a0023186 bedi, r.p., sinacore, a., & christiani, k.d. (2016). counselling psychology in canada. counselling psychology quarterly, 29, 150-162, doi: 10.1080/09515070.2015.1128398 berkman, n.d., lohr, k.n., & bulik, c.m. (2007). outcomes of eating disorders: a systematic review of the literature. international journal of eating disorders, 40, 293-309. doi: 10.1002/eat.203 bezanson, l., hopkins, s., & neault, r.a. (2016). career guidance and counselling in canada: still changing after all these years. canadian journal of counselling and psychotherapy (online), 50, 219-239. retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/docview/1810336129/fulltextpdf/e62712d9 7e2748edpq/1?accountid=9838 botha, d. (2015). anorexia nervosa: a fresh perspective. theory & psychology, 25, 328-345. doi: 10.1177/0959354314566490 brown, c., & jasper, k. (eds.). (1993). consuming passions: feminist approaches to weight preoccupation and eating disorders. toronto, on, canada: second story press. bruch, h. (1965). the psychiatric differential diagnosis of anorexia nervosa. in j.e. meyer & h. feldman (eds.), anorexia nervosa (pp. 70-87). stuttgart, de: thieme. canadian psychological association [cpa]. (n.d.). family psychology. retrieved from http://www.cpa.ca/aboutcpa/cpasections/familypsychology/ canadian psychological association [cpa]. (n.d.). industrial/organizational psychology. retrieved from http://www.cpa.ca/aboutcpa/cpasections/industrialorganizationalpsychology/ caputo, j.d. (2015). foreword: the wisdom of hermeneutics. in n.j. moules, g. mccaffrey, j.c. field, & c.m. laing, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice (pp. ix xiii). new york, ny: peter lang. carter, j.c., mercer-lynn, k.b., norwood, s.j., bewell-weiss, c.v., crosby, r.d., https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anorexia http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/docview/1810336129/fulltextpdf/e62712d97e2748edpq/1?accountid=9838 http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/docview/1810336129/fulltextpdf/e62712d97e2748edpq/1?accountid=9838 http://www.cpa.ca/aboutcpa/cpasections/familypsychology/ http://www.cpa.ca/aboutcpa/cpasections/industrialorganizationalpsychology/ williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 14 woodside, d.b., & olmsted, m.p. (2012). a prospective study of predictors of relapse in anorexia nervosa: implications for relapse prevention. psychiatry research, 200, 518-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.04.037 cash, t.f. (2002). the situational inventory of body-image dysphoria: psychometric evidence and development of a short form. international journal of eating disorders, 32, 362–366. doi: 10.1002/eat.10100 craigie, j., hope, t., tan, j., stewart, a., & mcmillan, j. (2013). agency, ambivalence and authenticity: the many ways in which anorexia nervosa can affect autonomy. international journal of law in context, 9, 20-36. doi:10.1017/s1744552312000456 colton, a., & pistrang, n. (2004). adolescents’ experiences of inpatient treatment for anorexia nervosa. european eating disorders review, 12, 307-316. doi: 10.1002/erv.587 cooper, m.j. (2005) cognitive theory in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: progress, development and future directions. clinical psychology review, 25, 511-531. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.01.003 corrigan, p., & rao, d. (2012). on the self-stigma of mental illness: stages, disclosure and strategies for change. canadian journal of psychiatry, 57, 459-464. retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/docview/1037989332/fulltextpdf/4f0702b5 305e49e5pq/1?accountid=9838 discovery. (n.d.). merriam webster’s online dictionary. retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discovery discover. (n.d.). online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=discover domene, j.f., & bedi, r.p. (2013). counseling and psychotherapy in canada: diversity and growth. in r. moodley, u.p. gielen, & r. wu (eds.), handbook of counseling and psychotherapy in an international context (pp. 106-116). new york, ny: routledge. forney, k.r., brown, t.a., holland-carter, l.a., kennedy, g.a., & keel, p.k. (2017). defining “significant weight loss” in atypical anorexia nervosa. international journal of eating disorders, 50, 952-962. doi: 10.1002/eat.22717 franko, d.l., keshaviah, a., eddy, k.t., krishna, m., davis, m.c., keel, p.k., & herzog, d.b. (2013). a longitudinal investigation of mortality in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. american journal of psychiatry, 170, 917-925. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12070868 gadamer, h-g. (2013). truth and method (bloomsbury revelations; j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). london, uk: bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.04.037 http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/docview/1037989332/fulltextpdf/4f0702b5305e49e5pq/1?accountid=9838 http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/docview/1037989332/fulltextpdf/4f0702b5305e49e5pq/1?accountid=9838 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discovery http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=discover https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12070868 williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 15 george, l., thornton, c., touyz, s.w., waller, g., & beumont, p.j.v. (2004). motivational enhancement and schema-focused cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of chronic eating disorders. clinical psychologist, 8, 81-85. doi: 10.1080/13284200412331304054 gilbert, n., arcelus, j., cashmore, r., thompson, b., langham, c., & meyer, c. (2012). should i ask about eating? patients’ disclosure of eating disorder symptoms and help-seeking behaviour. european eating disorders review, 20, 80-85. doi:10.1002/erv.1143 gladding, s.t., & alderson, k.g. (2012). counselling: a comprehensive profession (éd. can.). toronto, on, canada: pearson canada. gray, e.k., murray, h.b., & eddy, k.t. (2015). diagnosing anorexia nervosa. in l. smolak & m.p. levine (eds.), the wiley handbook of eating disorders (1st ed; pp. 93-104). west sussex, uk: john wiley & sons. doi: 10.1002/9781118574089.ch8 grondin, j. (1994). introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. new haven, ny: yale university press. gull, w.w. (1997). v. anorexia nervosa (apepsia hysterica, anorexia hysterica). obesity, 5, 498-502. (reprinted from transactions of the clinical society of london, pp. 22-28, by w.w. gull, 1874.) doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1997.tb00677.x habermas, t. (2015). history of anorexia nervosa. in l. smolak & m.p. levine’s (eds.), the wiley handbook of eating disorders (pp. 11-24), west sussex, uk: john wiley & sons. halmi, k.a. (2005). a complicated process: diagnosing and treating anorexia nervosa and bulimia. psychiatric times, 22, 59-59. retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/ps/i.do?p=hrca&u=ucalgary&id=gale|a132 920473&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&authcount=1# hoek, h.w. (2006). incidence, prevalence and mortality of anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders. current opinion in psychiatry, 19, 389-394. doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000228759.95237.78 hubert lacey, j., & sly, r. (2015). severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: diagnosis, features, and radical new treatment approaches. in l. smolak & m.p. levine’s (eds.), the wiley handbook of eating disorders (pp. 142-156), west sussex, uk: john wiley & sons. kass, a.e., kolko, r.p., & wilfley, d.e. (2013). psychological treatments for eating disorders. current opinion in psychiatry, 26, 549-555. doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e328365a30e kearney, r. (2010). anatheism: returning to god after god. new york, ny: columbia university press. doi: 10.7312/kear14788 keel, p.k., dorer, d. j., eddy, k.t., franko, d., charatan, d.l., & herzog, d.b. (2003). predictors of mortality in eating disorders. archives of general psychiatry, 60, 179-183. http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/ps/i.do?p=hrca&u=ucalgary&id=gale|a132920473&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&authcount=1 http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/ps/i.do?p=hrca&u=ucalgary&id=gale|a132920473&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&authcount=1 williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 16 doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.179 keel, p.k., & brown, t.a. (2010). update on course and outcome in eating disorders. international journal of eating disorders, 43, 195-204. doi: 10.1002/eat.20810 khalsa, s.s., portnoff, l.c., mccurdy-mckinnon, d., & feusner, j.d. (2017). what happens after treatment? a systematic review of relapse, remission, and recovery in anorexia nervosa. journal of eating disorders, 5, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-017-0145-3 lalande, v.m. (2004). counselling psychology: a canadian perspective. counselling psychology quarterly, 17, 273-286. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515070412331317576 laségue, d. (1997). on hysterical anorexia. obesity, 5, 492-497. (reprinted from medical times, pp. 265-266, by d. laségue, 1873.) doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1997.tb00676.x levine, m.p., & smolak, l. (2006). the prevention of eating problems and eating disorders: theory, research, and practice. mahwah, nj: lawrence erlbaum malson, h., & burns, m. (eds.). (2009). critical feminist approaches to eating dis/orders. new york, ny: routledge. marzola, e., abbate-daga, g., gramaglia, c., amianto, f., & fassino, s. (2015). a qualitative investigation into anorexia nervosa: the inner perspective. cogent psychology, 2, 1032493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2015.1032493 moules, n.j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes. an ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods, 1, 1-21. retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/160940690200100301 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. munley, p.h., duncan, l.e., & mcdonnel, k.a. (2004). counseling psychology in the united sates of america. counselling psychology quarterly, 17, 247-271. doi: 10.1080/09515070412331317602 neumark-sztainer, d., levine, m.p., paxton, s.j., smolak, l., piran, n., & wertheim, e.h. (2006). prevention of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating: what next? eating disorders, 14, 265-285. doi: 10.1080/10640260600796184 neumark-sztainer, d. (2005). “i’m, like, so fat!”: helping your teen make healthy choices about eating and exercise in a weight-obsessed world. new york, ny: guilford. neumark-sztainer, d., story, m., hannan, p.j., perry, c.l., & irving, l.m. (2002). weight https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-017-0145-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515070412331317576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2015.1032493 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/160940690200100301 williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 17 related concerns and behaviors among overweight and non-overweight adolescents: implications for preventing weight-related disorders. archives of pediatrics and adolescent medicine, 156, 171-178. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.2.171 nordbø, r.h.s., espeset, e.m.s., gulliksen, k.s., skårderud, f., & holte, a. (2006). the meaning of self‐starvation: a qualitative study of patients’ perception of anorexia nervosa. the international journal of eating disorders, 39, 556-564. doi: 10.1002/eat.20276 nordbø, r.h., espeset, e., gulliksen, k.s., skårderud, f., geller, j., & holte, a. (2012). reluctance to recover in anorexia nervosa. european eating disorders review, 20, 60-67. doi: 10.1002/erv.1097 reid, m., burr, j., williams, s., & hammersley, r. (2008). eating disorders patients’ views on their disorders and on an outpatient service: a qualitative study. journal of health psychology, 13, 956-960. doi: 10.1177/1359105308095070 robertson, s.e., & borgen, w.a. (2016). introduction to the special issue on the history of counselling in canada. canadian journal of counselling & psychotherapy/revue canadienne de counseling et de psychothérapie, 50, 197-206. retrieved from https://search-proquestcom.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/docview/1810336249?pq-origsite=summon&accountid=9838 robinson, p.h., kukucska, r., guidetti, g., & leavey, g. (2015). severe and enduring anorexia nervosa (seed‐an): a qualitative study of patients with 20+ years of anorexia nervosa. european eating disorders review, 23, 318-326. doi: 10.1002/erv.2367 russell-mayhew, s. (2007). preventing a continuum of disordered eating: going beyond the individual. the prevention researcher, 14, 7-10. retrieved from http://www.onehealth.ca/r_alberta_nwt/video_conferences/e110404a-hob.pdf ryan, c.j., & callaghan, s. (2014). treatment refusal in anorexia nervosa: the hardest of cases. journal of bioethical inquiry, 11, 43-45. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9498-8 parry-jones, w.l.l. (1985). archival exploration of anorexia nervosa. journal of psychiatric research, 19, 95-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(85)90004-4 santonastaso, p., camporese, a., caregaro, l., & favaro, a. (2008). late onset anorexia nervosa treated with olanzapine: a case report. psychological topics, 17, 329-33. retrieved from https://doaj.org/article/3c6564ab0cfe4060a2f5905e64e63fa9 schwarz, d., ponder, k.l., & feller, e.r. (2009). delayed diagnoses: nonspecific findings and diagnostic challenges in eating disorders. case reports in medicine, article id 841037 doi:10.1155/2009/841037 selvini palazzoli, m. (1974). anorexia nervosa. london: faber. (original work published 1963). sinacore, a.l. (2015). introduction. in a.l. sinacore & f. ginsberg (eds.), canadian https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/docview/1810336249?pq-origsite=summon&accountid=9838 https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/docview/1810336249?pq-origsite=summon&accountid=9838 http://www.onehealth.ca/r_alberta_nwt/video_conferences/e110404a-hob.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(85)90004-4 https://doaj.org/article/3c6564ab0cfe4060a2f5905e64e63fa9 williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 18 counselling and counselling psychology in the 21st century (pp. 3-14). montreal, qc, canada: mcgill-queens university press. steinhausen, h.c. (2002). the outcome of anorexia nervosa in the 20th century. american journal of psychiatry, 159, 1284-1293. retrieved from http://www.saegre.org.ar/biblioteca/arbol_bibliografico/agosto2005/1284_anorexia_outcome.pdf steinhausen, h.c. (2008). outcome of eating disorders. child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of north america, 18, 225-242. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2008.07.013 sundgot‐borgen, j., & torstveit, m.k. (2010). aspects of disordered eating continuum in elite high‐intensity sports. scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 20, 112-121. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01190.x tantleff-dunn, s., barnes, r.d., & larose, j.g. (2011). it's not just a “woman thing”: the current state of normative discontent. eating disorders, 19, 392-402. doi:10.1080/10640266.2011.609088 vandereycken, w., & van humbeeck, i. (2008). denial and concealment of eating disorders: a retrospective survey. european eating disorders review, 16, 109-114. doi: 10.1002/erv.857 von ranson, k.m., wallace, l.m., & stevenson, a. (2012). psychotherapies provided for eating disorders by community clinicians: infrequent use of evidence-based treatment. psychotherapy research, 23, 333-343. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.735377 voriadaki, t., simic, m., espie, j., & eisler, i. (2015). intensive multi‐family therapy for adolescent anorexia nervosa: adolescents’ and parents’ day‐to‐day experiences. journal of family therapy, 37, 5-23. doi: 10.1111/1467-6427.12067 watson, h.j., & bulik, c.m. (2013). update on the treatment of anorexia nervosa: review of clinical trials, practice guidelines and emerging interventions. psychological medicine, 43, 24772500. doi:10.1017/s0033291712002620 williams, s., & reid, m. (2010). understanding the experience of ambivalence in anorexia nervosa: the maintainer's perspective. psychology and health, 25, 551-567. doi: 10.1080/08870440802617629 williams, e.p., russell-mayhew s., & ireland, a. (in press). disclosing an eating disorder: a situational analysis of online accounts. the qualitative report. young, r. (2009). counseling in the canadian mosaic: a cultural perspective. in. l.h. gerstain, p.p. heppner, k.l. norworthy, s. aegisdottir, & s.a. leung (eds.), international handbook of cross-cultural counseling: cultural assumptions and practices worldwide (pp. 359367). thousand oaks, ca: sage. young, r.a., & nichol, j.j. (2007). counselling psychology in canada: advancing psychology http://www.saegre.org.ar/biblioteca/arbol_bibliografico/agosto2005/1284_anorexia_outcome.pdf williams et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 3 19 for all. applied psychology: an international review, 56, 20-32. doi: 10.1111/j.14640597.2007.00273.x corresponding author: kevin aho, phd dept. of communication and philosophy florida gulf coast university kaho@fgcu.edu journal of applied hermeneutics april 9, 2018 the author(s) 2018 neurasthenia revisited: on medically unexplained syndromes and the value of hermeneutic medicine kevin aho abstract the rise of medically unexplained conditions like fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome in the united states looks remarkably similar to the explosion of neurasthenia diagnoses in the late nineteenth century. in this paper, i argue the historical connection between neurasthenia and today’s medically unexplained conditions hinges largely on the uncritical acceptance of naturalism in medicine. i show how this cultural acceptance shapes the way in which we interpret and make sense of nervous distress while, at the same time, neglecting the unique social and historical forces that continue to produce it. i draw on the methods of hermeneutic philosophy to expose the limits of naturalism and forward an account of health and illness that acknowledges the extent to which we are always embedded in contexts of meaning that determine how we experience and understand our suffering. keywords neurasthenia, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, somatization, naturalism, hermeneutics in 1881, new york neurologist george m. beard published american nervousness, its causes and consequences: a supplement to nervous exhaustion (neurasthenia). in this expansive work, beard examined the explosive growth of affective and somatic symptoms emerging from “neurasthenia,” the deficiency or exhaustion of, what he called, “nerve force.” he identified a vast number of possible symptoms for neurasthenia including: neuralgia, dyspepsia, hay-fever, diabetes, sensitivity to narcotics and various drugs, depression, premature baldness, sensitivity to mailto:kaho@fgcu.edu aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 2 cold and heat, tooth decay, chronic catarrh, infertility, hysteria, inebriety, fatigue, and impotence (beard, 1881, vi-xi).1 beard attributed the rise of neurasthenia both to a hereditary predisposition as well as the wrenching social upheavals of modernization in the united states at the end of the nineteenth century, as large swaths of the post-civil war population migrated from slow-paced rural communities to chaotic and bustling cities in the northeast. with this movement, men abandoned their traditional vocations as manual tradesmen and farmers for new roles as workers in office buildings, and women left their stable domestic roles as wives and mothers to compete with men in universities and professional careers. beard also cited the new technologies of industrialization such as the periodical press, the telegraph, telephone, and steam engine, as well as the ubiquity of mechanical clocks and watches that “compel us to be on time, and excite the habit of looking to see the exact moment” (p. 103).2 these factors, taken together, contributed to the excessive strain on mental and physical life, and helped explain beard’s claim that the “chief and primary cause” of neurasthenia is not the result of some new organic pathology but of “modern civilization [itself]” (p. vi). by the turn of the century, neurasthenia had spread to the other side of the atlantic to europe’s teeming urban centers.3 influential cultural figures such as sociologist max weber and novelist marcel proust received the diagnosis, and neurasthenic characters became increasingly fashionable in the fiction of writers such as edith wharton, theodore dreiser, henry james, and thomas mann. indeed, the diagnosis became so common in the united states that philosopher william james referred to it as “americanitis,” and the massive drugstore chain rexall produced an “americanitis elixir” for the “man of business, weakened by the strain of [his] duties” (osnos, 2011). by the end of the great war, due to its diagnostic vagueness, its unproven theory of “nervous energy,” and the ambiguous breadth of its symptoms, neurasthenia began to fall out of favor in the united states.4 but today we are seeing the symptoms of neurasthenia emerge once again in a proliferation of “functional somatic conditions” such as chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. in this paper, i offer an account of the medicalization of neurasthenia and show how this process has undermined the original value of beard’s work by failing to engage the socio-cultural forces through which neurasthenic symptoms emerged. rather than viewing the neurasthenic from a narrow naturalistic perspective, as a discrete causally determined physical organism, beard’s analysis views the neurasthenic in terms of, what hermeneutic philosophers such as martin heidegger would later call, “being-in-the-world,” a situated activity or way of 1 the ideas in american nervousness emerged out of an earlier article of beard’s (1869) entitled “neurasthenia or nervous exhaustion.” 2 george simmel develops this point in his pioneering 1903 essay, “the metropolis and mental life” (1903/1997) by exploring the emotional costs of clock-time, where “punctuality, calculability, [and] exactness are forced upon life by…metropolitan existence.” (p. 177; see aho, 2007) 3 it is interesting to note that neurasthenia stretched across class and gender lines in a way that was unique among functional somatic conditions. it was diagnosed first among upper middle class women; then among “stressed out” middle class business men; and finally among the lower working classes before vanishing altogether from american medicine. (gosling, 1987; wessely, 1990) 4 although it eventually disappeared as a diagnostic category in the united states, the diagnosis continues to be applied in europe and is still listed in the icd-10, and it is used widely in countries such as japan, korea, china, australia, and russia. aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 3 being that is already involved and embedded in a meaningful socio-historical context. this situated activity not only shapes the way we experience, feel, and perform our bodies, more importantly, it informs how we interpret and give meaning to our nervous distress. drawing on the insights of hermeneutic philosophy, i call into question some of the core naturalistic assumptions in medicine today. this questioning, in turn, makes it possible to interpret the toxic experiences of stress and nervous suffering from within the context of our contemporary ways of living. which is to say, in effect, that modern medicine is often complicit in enacting and perpetuating the very pathologies it is seeking to treat. neurasthenia and naturalism: a brief history the diagnosis of neurasthenia emerged against the backdrop of enormous successes in the natural sciences in the nineteenth century in areas such as anatomy and physiology, zoology, evolutionary theory, and in the emerging field of neurology of which george beard was a pioneer. these successes contributed to the loss of religious authority and an increasing trust in the methods of natural science to explain and alleviate bodily suffering. this secular turn not only contributed to the emergent vocational prestige and cultural power of the medical professions, it also influenced the pervasive naturalistic paradigm that has fundamentally transformed the ways in which medicine interprets pathology.5 naturalism in medicine entails both an epistemological and a metaphysical assumption. from an epistemological standpoint, naturalism generally presupposes that the view of theoretical detachment and the objective procedures of empirical science are best suited to gain knowledge of the ailing body. from a metaphysical standpoint, naturalism assumes a position of physicalism, that all manifestations of sickness must be constituted in terms of physical substances in causal interaction and that these interactions can be quantified under mathematical laws of mass and motion (ratcliffe, 2009). this paradigm creates the mechanistic and objectifying picture that characterizes medicine today, where a disease is considered legitimate or “real” only insofar as there is a measurable lesion or a deviation from normal functioning that is identifiable by anatomical or physiological-chemical observation. the result is a kind of biological reductionism, where pathology—including mental illness— is generally viewed as having a physical or bio-chemical origin. on this account, apropos of mental illness, the dutch physiologist jakob moleschott wrote, “the brain secretes thoughts as the kidney secretes urine” (cited in szasz, 2007, p. 47). this reductionism was evident in the way american medicine framed its understanding of nervous disorders at the end of the nineteenth century.6 indeed, it could be argued one of the reasons that beard’s account of neurasthenia became a diagnostic juggernaut is because it was viewed as “a physical, not a mental state” (beard, 1881, p. 17). by 1900, neurasthenia had become the single most common diagnosis in the area of neuropathology and psychopathology (shorter, 1992). by tracing its origin to a congenital weakness of the nervous system, beard’s thesis made it “real” from the perspective of 5 this cultural shift was evident, for example, in the ways that various forms of social deviance earlier regarded as religious or moral failings by priests— such as alcoholism, depression, and homosexuality— came to be medicalized by doctors in the twentieth-century (see aho & aho, 2008, pp. 65-70). 6 it is important to note that medical treatment and the interpretation of disease in the united states tends to be far more reductive and mechanistic then other westernized countries (e.g., payer, 1989). aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 4 naturalism, and this gave it scientific legitimacy. although many of its most pronounced symptoms were psychological— including crippling phobias, depression, panic anxiety, and compulsiveness—its status as a physical disease meant that the medical establishment could take sufferers seriously. it was not madness that triggered the “nervous breakdown,” but a physiological depletion of the body’s finite reserves of electrical “nerve force.” by removing the stigma of shame and fear associated with insanity, neurasthenia was often viewed positively: not only as a mark of a highly evolved and refined nervous system but of a man’s commitment to the protestant values of industriousness and productivity or, in the case of women, of sensitive intellectual and literary proclivities. emerging in the busy urban corridors of the east coast, it was initially viewed as the signature disorder of middle and upper class “brain workers”— as opposed to rural “muscle workers”—whose focus and ambition could not match the frantic pace of a modern capitalist society. physician george drinka (1984) described the phenomenon in terms of a person with a nervous tendency [who] is driven to think, to work, to strive for success. he presses himself and his life force to the limit, straining his circuits. like an overloaded battery, or like prometheus exhausted from reaching too high for the fire of the gods, the sufferer’s electrical system crashes down, spewing sparks and symptoms and giving rise to neurasthenia. (p. 191) in this way, neurasthenia provided both a scientifically legitimate (i.e., naturalistic, physical) and culturally accepted (i.e., burnout, overwork) justification for being sick (abbey & garfinkel, 1991). rather than being viewed as insane, treated by a psychiatrist (or “alienist’ as they were called at time because they dealt with those who were alienated or estranged from everyday life), and banished to the custodial care of the mental asylum, a prosperous neurasthenic could be cared for privately by a “real” doctor, a neurologist trained in general pathology and internal medicine, and given the standard somatic treatment of the time, namely, bed rest, a milk diet, electrical stimulation, and massage (freedman, 1987; shorter, 1997, pp. 129-136). this is how neurasthenia exploded in popularity at the turn of the century, becoming a “catch-all” diagnosis for anyone suffering from inchoate feelings of exhaustion, pain, anxiety, and nervousness. but almost as quickly as neurasthenia emerged as a diagnostic behemoth, it began to fade, eventually disappearing from american medicine altogether. this decline can be attributed to a number of overlapping factors. first, what contributed to the staggering popularity of neurasthenia also contributed to its precipitous decline, namely the sheer broadness of its definition. beard identified over seventyfive possible symptoms of neurasthenia with the result that virtually anyone could be diagnosed with the condition. in terms of neurasthenia-related phobias alone, he listed: “fear of lightning, fear of responsibility, fear of open places, fear of closed places, fear of society, fear of being alone, fear of fears, fear of contamination, fear of everything” (beard, 1881, p. 7). as a result, “one found [neurasthenia] everywhere,” wrote a french author of the time, “in the salons, at the theater, in the novels, at the palace. by virtue of it, one explained the most disparate reactions of an individual: suicide and decadent art, adornment and adultery; it became the giant of neuropathology” (cited in chatel & peele, 1970, p. 37) the ubiquity of neurasthenia’s symptoms made the disorder virtually impossible to classify with any precision. in describing what he aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 5 called ‘the caprice’ of the condition, beard acknowledged that, “sufferers often times wonder and complain that they have so many symptoms [because] their pain and distress attack so many parts and organs” (beard, 1880, p. 76). this diagnostic ambiguity resulted in increasing skepticism in the scientific community, becoming “the garbage can of medicine” (wessely, 1990, p. 47). the decline was also marked by the fact that neurasthenia’s medical advocates could not identify a specific organic or physiological cause. beard’s belief was that it was a physical disorder of weakened nerve cells characteristic of a hereditary or congenital condition. the stronger one’s heredity, the more strain an individual could endure before succumbing to “nervous bankruptcy” and vice versa (gossling, 1987, pp. 84-5). it was thought that the dramatic social, economic, and technological changes taking place in america at the time served as a trigger for those with a congenital weakness of “nerve force.” as beard (1881) put it: the force in [the] nervous system…is limited; and when new functions are interposed in the circuit, as modern civilization is constantly requiring us to do, there comes a period, sooner or later, varying in different individuals, and at different times of life, when the amount of force is insufficient to keep all the lamps actively burning; those that are weakest go out entirely, or, as more frequently happens, burn faint and feebly—they do not expire, but give an insufficient and unstable light. (p. 99) the neurasthenic, in short, could not endure the physical and mental strain of a country that was “becoming rapidly americanized.” the problem, of course, is that beard’s thesis remained scientifically untestable. yet, even though physicians could not find an organic cause for neurasthenia, they also could not deny that a condition existed that was overwhelming a large swath of america’s urban population, incapacitating individuals who were previously living successful and productive lives (freedman, 1987).7 the question for physicians was whether or not it could be demonstrated that it was a single disease or if a more precise nosology could identify specific disorders that existed within this broad classification. and it was the issue of nosology that sealed neurasthenia’s fate. neurasthenia, psychiatry, and the crisis of validity in 1895, sigmund freud published a paper called “on the grounds for detaching a particular syndrome from neurasthenia under the description of anxiety neurosis.” this signaled one of the first attempts to provide a more rigorous system of classification, parceling out “anxiety neurosis” and “hysteria” from the general category of neurasthenia. shortly thereafter, freud’s contemporary pierre janet did the same with “compulsivity,” detaching it from neurasthenia. these diagnostic changes meant far fewer were suffering from the condition (gossling, 1987, p. 169; wessely, 1990, p. 47). although fin de siècle figures like freud, janet, and jean-martin charcot were trained as neurologists and were still committed to the idea of the physical natur e 7 beard’s theory was further undermined by the discovery of hormones in 1902, which convinced physicians they had identified a specific causal agent—a chemical or hormonal imbalance that fit nicely into the mechanistic model of naturalism. the problem with this early version of the “chemical imbalance” theory was that, although hormones certainly exist, it could never be demonstrated that they in fact caused nervous disorders (chatel & peele 1970). aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 6 of nervous disorders, they did not rely exclusively on the trademark somatic therapies of the day such as bed rest, electrical stimulation, massage, and water and thermal therapies. they focused instead on mental processes or disorders of the mind, with the idea that the physical symptoms of neurosis might arise as the result of unconscious, usually libidinous, conflicts that emerged in early childhood. with this turn, “psychotherapy” (or the “talking cure”) was born as a way of verbally accessing long repressed sexual desires and fantasies. using dialogical techniques such as dream analysis, free association, and transference, the therapist would help the patient become aware of their unconscious conflicts, and this awareness might free them of the physical symptoms of neurosis, demonstrating, in the words of one of charcot’s students, “that the body could be cured by the mind” (cited in shorter, 1997, p. 138). although the “talking cure” became wildly popular with middle and upper class society in mid twentieth century america and was generally recognized by the medical establishment as offering legitimate therapeutic techniques to treat neurosis, its scientific foundations remained dubious. this is because psychoanalysis does not fit well into the empirical framework of naturalism. the assumption that an individual’s neurotic behavior could, for example, be explained in terms of repressed libidinous fantasies did not meet the objective standards of observation and testability that characterize empirical science. as opposed to somatic medicine, there is no way to physically locate, test for, or measure the source of repression or psychic conflict that manifests neurotic symptoms. unlike physical abnormalities of blood, muscle, and bone, the abnormalities of the mind cannot be directly observed because, obviously, mental phenomena are not physical substances. the psychiatrist cannot point to an organic lesion or marker in the brain that secretes abnormal thoughts and emotions. as a result, they can only infer what a given mental disorder or abnormality is based on speculative theoretical assumptions, that is, on the metapsychology of the psychiatrist. but such inferences are unscientific precisely because they are impossible to empirically refute or falsify. in the latter half of the twentieth century, with advances in neuroscience, pharmacology, and genetic research, psychiatry attempted to regain a footing in the natural sciences by embracing a more empirical and biologically informed approach to mental illness. this new vision of biopsychiatry was framed by influential figures like nancy andreasen (1984) who wrote: the major psychiatric illnesses are diseases… they should be considered illnesses just as diabetes, heart disease, and cancer are… caused principally by biological factors, and most of these factors reside in the brain… the brain is the organ of the body that serves to monitor and control the rest of the bodily functions, as well as providing the source and storehouse of all psychological functions, such as thoughts, memories, feelings, and personality. as a scientific discipline, psychiatry seeks to identify the biological factors that cause mental illness. the model assumes that each different type of illness has a different cause. (pp. 29-30) central to this shift toward bio-psychiatry was a major revision by the american psychiatric association (apa) to the third edition of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (dsm-iii) in 1980. this involved a thorough rejection of the ideology and jargon of psychoanalysis with the aim of implementing a system of disease classification based on empirically observable symptoms. according to robert spitzer, the primary architect of the aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 7 dsm-iii, this revision represented psychiatry’s return to medical legitimacy, “an advancement toward the fulfillment of the scientific aspirations of the profession” (cited in lewis, 2006, p. 4). key to this transformation was the elimination of the broad and ideologically loaded category of “neurosis” that was replaced with the more neutral medical term “disorder.” henceforth, what was once neurosis was carved into seven more precise and reliable disease classifications, each with its own symptoms and diagnostic criteria: agoraphobia, panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, simple phobia, and social phobia (horwitz, 2002). having addressed many of the affective dimensions of neurasthenia by eliminating neurosis, the dsm-iii also addressed somatic dysfunctions. it did this by eradicating the archaic category or “hysteria’ and replacing it with a new diagnostic label, “somatoform disorder.” this was intended to identify those patients who presented with symptoms like chronic pain, dizziness, weakness, gastrointestinal issues, and fatigue, but had no demonstrable physical cause. for diagnostic precision, this category was also broken up into seven discrete disorders: body dysmorphic disorder, conversion, somatization, somatoform pain disorder, undifferentiated somatoform disorder, somatoform disorder not otherwise specified, and hypochondriasis (lipowski, 1988). but discarding antiquated disease categories and the metapsychology of psychoanalysis for the sake of diagnostic precision did little to address the core issue of scientific validity; instead, it simply created more disorders. while the dsm-i (1952) was only 130 pages long and listed 106 different disorders, the dsm-iii was almost 500 pages long and contained 265 disorders, and dsm-v (2013) is 800 pages and describes nearly 300 disorders. not only is there tremendous overlap or co-morbidity among these disorders (for instance, someone diagnosed with somatoform pain disorder could also present symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, and major depression, resulting in a patient having not just one but four distinct disorders), none of the disorders can be explained using the “gold standard” of pathology, namely, a physical marker in the brain. in other words, the hope that an empirically rigorous system of classification might help legitimize psychiatry as a medical science by providing “greater objectivity, diagnostic precision, and reliability” (usdhhs, 1999, p. 44) has proven to be an illusion. to this day, psychiatry has generally failed to demonstrate that behavioral, cognitive, and emotional abnormalities are the effects of biological diseases of the brain, this, in spite of the recent discovery of neurotransmitters and receptors, advances in genetics, and magnetic resonance technologies. indeed, only in the most severe cases, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, is there any evidence at all of a biological (i.e., genetic) marker (horwitz, 2002). for the vast number of nonpsychotic disorders listed in the dsm, the psychiatrist is left to make inferences, not on the basis of biology but on the basis of the observable behavior of the patient, their speech patterns, posture, facial expressions, and comportment. but what counts as abnormal in these respects are not medical (i.e., scientific); they are social, cultural, and religious (szasz, 2007). psychiatrist, nassir ghaemi (2013), summarized the situation this way: “the leaders of the dsm [do not] believe there are scientific truths in psychiatric diagnosis—only mutually agreed upon falsehoods. they call it reliability” (n.p.). as a result, psychiatry continues to be regarded with suspicion and skepticism, even by its own practitioners, as “the dustbin of modern medicine” aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 8 (wessely, 1990, p. 42). sufferers of nervous disorders remain, as ever, haunted by the specter that what they experience is “imaginary,” “unreal,” or “in their heads.” in what follows, i suggest this enduring skepticism about psychiatry may shed light on the renewed interest in medically unexplained somatic conditions such as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome that bear striking resemblances to neurasthenia. by emphasizing a somatic or non-psychiatric explanation of symptoms, the diagnosis creates the impression of medical legitimacy, of being “real.” i argue that, from a hermeneutic perspective, this is crucial for the narrative integrity and self-constitution of the sufferer. hermeneutics, somatization, and medically unexplained syndromes one of the advantages of approaching questions of health and illness from a hermeneutic perspective is the way in which it reconfigures the traditional conception of the human being. rather than viewing the human being in naturalistic terms, as a causally determined physical substance, hermeneutic philosophy sees it as an interpretive activity, where we exist in the narrative identities and self-interpretations that we create for ourselves. on this view, it is not an account of “what we are” as biophysical entities that is important, but “how we are,” that is, how we ceaselessly fashion and refashion our own being (or identity) as our lives unfold. this is why, when referring to the hermeneutic self, heidegger wrote, “we are expressing not its ‘what’ (as if it were a table, house, or tree) but its being” (1927/1962, p. 180) this means that there is no pregiven physiological essence that fundamentally determines who we are. on the contrary, what distinguishes us from non-human animals is the fact that we are “self-interpreting” (taylor, 1985), that is, we “create” or “understand” who we are by interpreting and giving meaning to our physiological givenness. as self-interpreting beings, when we suffer from nervous exhaustion, diffuse pain, and anxiety it is up to each of us to understand it, that is, to imbue those symptoms with the intelligibility and significance that they have. moreover, the meanings we give to our suffering are always embedded in a particular sociocultural context. as a result, the hermeneutic self cannot be viewed as an encapsulated subject separate and distinct from an external world of objects (including other people). rather, “self and world belong together. [they] are not two beings like subject and object … self and world are the basic determination of [human existence] itself in the unity of the structure of being-in-theworld” (heidegger, 1982, p. 297). as an inter-subjective “being-in-the-world,” our interpretations are limited or constrained by the meanings made available by our situation. the world, on this view, opens up an array of possible ways for us to understand and make sense of our suffering. and because our interpretative context today is shaped so decisively by the paradigm of natural science, it is easy to see how the symptoms of neurasthenia are reborn in “functional somatic” conditions like fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. 8 because we are so invested emotionally and cognitively in physical or somatic explanations for our nervous 8 in listing the symptoms of neurasthenia, beard referred to “profound exhaustion,” “pains in the back,” and “heaviness in the loins and limbs” (1881, p. 7) which today could indicate a diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome. he cited “localized peripheral numbness and hyperesthesia,” ‘ticklishness,” “local spasms of muscles,” and “vague pains and flying neuralgias’ which fit the diagnostic profile of fibromyalgia (pp. 7-8) and he cited special idiosyncrasies with regard to “food,” “cramps,” “nervous dyspepsia,” and “indigestion” (pp. 7, 41) which resemble the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 9 distress, it follows that under the auspices of naturalism, such explanations indicate the existence of something legitimate and “real.” this is why, as robert aronowitz cautioned, “[there is] a market for somatic labels… in the large pool of ‘stressed-out’ or somaticizing patients who seek to disguise an emotional complaint or to ‘upgrade’ their diagnosis from a nebulous (i.e. psychiatric) one to a legitimate disease.” (1991, p. 97) this process can be described as “somatization.” not to be confused with the somatoform disorder in the dsm, somatization refers to a type of narrative construction or self-interpretation, where mental exhaustion, diffuse pain, anxiety, and stress arising largely out of the situated upheavals and emergencies of living are experienced and explained as a physical disorder, even when there is no evidence to support it (lipowski, 1988). consider the case of linda. linda had spurned previous recommendations for psychiatric counseling. she would not accept that she might have a psychiatric illness, and was angry, rather than relieved, when doctors implied that ‘nothing is wrong with you’ and that ‘it is all in your head’. she was convinced that something was physically wrong, and she wanted [the doctor] to identify and treat that problem. (young, 2003, p. 165) although physicians would usually treat linda’s condition as “psychosomatic,” as a somatic presentation of mental illness, for sufferers there is something deeply consoling when it is explained in physicalist terms. this is because it allows the patient to fashion a narrative that fits into the culturally accepted paradigm of naturalism. even though “functional somatic” conditions are scientifically dubious (i.e., they cannot be traced back to an organic cause), the fact that they are regarded as physical explanations of their symptoms is often sufficient for the patient to construct an account of their suffering in a way that is not only intelligible but culturally legitimate. fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome, then, are not just useful diagnostic labels. for patients, they are symbols that reflect a specific cultural reality and help to create a meaningful identity. as jerome groopman (2000) claimed, “of all the words a doctor uses, the name he gives the illness has the greatest weight…. with a name, the patient can construct an explanation of his illness not only for others but for himself” (n.d.). on the hermeneutic view, language and the words used in diagnostic medicine are expressive of a wider culture and are as rhetorically valuable as the physician’s stethoscope, syringe, or scalpel because it allows the patient to fashion an intelligible self-interpretation. this helps to sharpen the distinction between the biochemical aspects of “disease” and the subjective experience of ‘illness” (conrad, 1987). if the physician’s instruments treat and measure disease, language allows the patient to give meaning to the lived-experience of their unease. where the language of spirits, sin, and guilt was expressive of the context of meaning that allowed people to make sense of their suffering in the middle ages, the language of naturalism and somatization is expressive of our context today. this helps explain why, instead of going to a psychiatrist for complaints of inchoate feelings of pain and fatigue, insomnia, racing heart, digestive problems, or difficulty concentrating, we instead go to a medical specialist to validate our experience. we seek an immunologist to receive a diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome, a rheumatologist for a fibromyalgia diagnosis, a neurologist for tension headache, a cardiologist for atypical chest pain aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 10 and palpitations, or a gastroenterologist for irritable bowel syndrome. by medicalizing these symptoms, the patient feels validated, that there is a “real” cause to his or her suffering even if the physician does not see it this way (barker, 2002; hearn, 2009; jimenez & mayer, 2015). thus, even though the majority of those labeled with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue have an accompanying psychiatric disorder, and the treatment is often the same as the treatment for anxiety or major depression (e.g,. a combination of antidepressant medication, exercise, and/or some form of cognitive-behavioral therapy), patients generally favor a “functional somatic” diagnosis because it avoids the stigma of unreality associated with mental illness (wessely, 1990). the uncritical assumption underlying somatization, then, is that it is only a matter of time before an authentic biochemical “fact” can be found that directly causes the syndrome. and excitement builds in the medical community with the scientific discovery of each new cause, whether it is measurable deficiencies in neurotransmitters like serotonin and dopamine, low levels of somatotropin or growth hormone, or the poor sensory functioning of “substance p” (groopman, 2000). but it is this assumption that is precisely what a hermeneutic approach to medicine calls into question. even if such a discovery is made, it is still up to the sufferer to understand and give meaning to their own subjective experience on the basis of the interpretative resources made available by their world. hermeneutic philosophy dissolves the traditional scientific distinction between objective “facts” and subjective “values.” from the standpoint of hermeneutics, there are no brute, value-less facts when it comes to human experience. as charles taylor wrote, such “a reductive explanation of human experience in physiological and ultimately in physical and chemical terms” is a denial of the qualitative meaning and value we attribute to our experience (1985, p. 47). in fact, on closer view, the allegedly neutral and objective explanations of biochemistry are themselves valueladen insofar as they emerge against the background of a common language and are viewed by culture in qualitative terms as “valid” and “real.” we can make sense of our experiences only through the language that we grow into. biomedical reductivism betrays this aspect of enculturation and the complexity and ambiguity of “being-in-the-world,” and this brings us back to the value of beard’s initial characterization of neurasthenia. neurasthenia today although beard’s theory of “nerve force” was scientifically unfounded, what makes it so relevant today is how it critically engaged the way of being unique to modernity. instead of regarding the sufferer as a discrete object separate and distinct from his or her context and offering a biochemical account of physical and emotional exhaustion, beard focused on the broad social and cultural upheavals taking place at the end of the nineteenth century, and he examined the possibility that simply existing amidst these upheavals might be unhealthy. by attending to the destabilizing social forces associated with turn of the century american life— urbanization, industrialization, the insecurities of a market economy, new transportation and communication technologies, and the emerging dominance of clock-time—beard recognized that neurasthenia was “an inevitable reaction from the excessive stain of mental and physical life” (1881, p. 83). as a physician, approaching questions of health and illness in a historically and sociologically informed way, he saw the obvious, that the human being is not an encapsulated material body but an interpretative way of being that is already bound up in a particular lifeaho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 11 world, one that invariably shapes our emotional and physical health. today, with corporate downsizing and outsourcing, increased productivity and efficiency measures, and overall economic insecurity combined with wearable technologies that keep us perpetually on alert, electronically tethered to work and to each other, beard’s conclusion seems self-evident, that “nervous sensitiveness and nervous diseases ought to increase with the progress of modern civilization; and neurasthenia would naturally be more abundant in the present than in the last century” (p. 137). beard’s account of the toxic effects of an over-stimulated, insecure, and mechanized existence not only reflects contemporary descriptions of american life as perpetually “overwhelmed,” “stressed,” and “burned out.” it also opens the possibility for a deeper analysis of the particularities of nervous distress. this is especially interesting as it pertains to issues of gender. whereas for men, neurasthenia was once widely regarded as a mark of ambition and drive, “[an] acceptable and even an impressive illness… ideally suited to a capitalistic society and to the identification of masculinity with money and property” (showalter, 1985, p. 135). for women, the situation is far more complex. among those suffering from neurasthenia at the turn of the century, women were disproportionately represented. and today, the vast majority of those complaining of medically unexplained somatic conditions are also women, including ninety percent of all fibromyalgia sufferers (groopman, 2000). rather than attributing this overrepresentation to the idiosyncrasies of a woman’s reproductive organs and hormones, beard took a broad hermeneutic view, focusing on the changing social roles and meanings for women in a new industrialized economy, her entry and acceptance into colleges and the professions, and her emergent vocational ambition and drive (abbey & garfinkel, 1991, p. 1643). although criticized as a misogynist by regarding motherhood and domesticity as a woman’s natural state, 9 beard’s view resonates to the concerns of contemporary feminist critics by exposing the limits of medicalization and drawing our attention to the concrete social and historical forces that produce and reproduce our nervous distress. this not only helps frame what betty freidan in the 1960s called, “the problem that has no name” (referring to the social conformism of the post-world war ii american economy that pushed women into lives of empty domesticity resulting in “housewife neurosis” and its accompanying symptoms of fatigue, emotional irritability, and despair) (shuster, 2011, p. 164). it also situates the gendered incarnation of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome today as women struggle with rapidly changing social roles, busily trying to balance careers, family obligations, and personal ambitions all while confronting social obstacles like discrimination, lower pay, and sexual harassment. in this way, beard’s account anticipates the relational complexity and ambiguity of our “being-in-the-world” later acknowledged in hermeneutic philosophy and creates an opening for health care professionals to adopt a more nuanced and contextualized perspective when it comes to the experience and interpretation of nervous suffering. while it is true that medicalizing nervousness creates a consoling sense of legitimacy by making it “real” under the paradigm of 9 beard and his contemporary, neurologist s. weir mitchell warned against the educational, creative, and intellectual pursuits of women as they contribute to her nervous exhaustion. after prescribing his notorious “rest cure” for writer charlotte perkins gilman, for instance, mitchell implored her going forward to “live as domestic a life as possible. have your child with you all the time… lie down an hour after each meal. have but two hours’ intellectual life a day. and never touch pen, brush or pencil as long as you live” (gilman, 1975, p. 96, my emphasis.) aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 12 naturalism, it fails to critically engage the historical context that made the paradigm possible in the first place. hermeneutic medicine acknowledges our “being-in-the-world”; that we exist only in the social meanings we create for ourselves, and that it is only through these shared selfinterpretations that we can experience and make sense of our suffering. compliance with ethical standards: this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author. acknowledgement: i would like to thank sociologist gesine hearn at idaho state university for her many helpful suggestions and comments on earlier drafts of this paper. references abbey, s., & garfinkel, p. (1991). neurasthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome: the role of culture in the making of a diagnosis. american journal of psychiatry, 148(12), 1638-1646. aho, k. 2007. simmel on acceleration, boredom, and extreme aesthesia. journal for the theory of social behavior, 37(4), 447-462. aho, k., & aho, j. (2008). body matters: a phenomenology of sickness, illness, and disease. lanham, md: lexington books. aronowitz, r. (1991). lyme disease: the social construction of a new disease and its social consequences. the milbank quarterly, 69(1), 79-112. barker, k. (2002). self-help literature and the making of an illness identity: the case of fibromyalgia syndrome (fms). social problems, 49 (3), 279-300. beard, g. (1880). a practical treatise on nervous exhaustion (neurasthenia). new york, ny: william wood. beard, g. (1881). american nervousness, its causes and consequences: a supplement to nervous exhaustion (neurasthenia). new york, ny: g. p. putnam’s sons. chatel, j., & peele, r. (1970). the concept of neurasthenia. international journal of psychiatry, 9, 36-49. conrad, p. (1987). the experience of illness: recent and new directions. research in the sociology of health care, 6, 1-31. freedman, a. (1987). introduction. before freud: neurasthenia and the american medical community, 1870-1910. urbana and chicago, il: university of illinois press. aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 13 freud, s. (1895). in j. strachey (ed.), on the grounds of detaching a particular syndrome from neurasthenia under the description of ‘anxiety neurosis’ (standard ed.; vol. 3; pp. 87-115). london, uk: hogarth press. ghaemi, n. (2013). requiem for the dsm. psychiatric times, http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/dsm-5-0/requiem-dsm accessed april 6, 2016. gilman, c. (1975). the living of charlotte perkins gilman: an autobiography. new york, ny: harper colophon gosling, f.g. (1987). before freud: neurasthenia and the american medical community, 18701910. urbana and chicago, il: university of illinois press. greenberg, d. (1990). neurasthenia in the 1980s: chronic mononucleosis, chronic fatigue syndrome and anxiety and depressive disorders. psychosomatics, 31(2), 129-137. groopman, j. (2000). hurting all over: with so many people in so much pain, how could fibromyalgia not be a disease? the new yorker, november 13, 2000. hearn, g. (2009). no clue—what shall we do? physicians and functional syndromes. international review of modern sociology, 35, 95-113. heidegger, m. (1982). basic problems of phenomenology (a. hofstadter, trans.). bloomington, in: indiana university press. heidegger, m. (1927/1962). being and time (j. macquarrie & e. robinson, trans.). new york, ny: harper and row. horwitz, a. (2002). creating mental illness. chicago, il: university of chicago press. jimenez, x., & mayer, p. (2015). medically unexplained symptoms and mental models: from failure to fusion and back to illness behavior. journal of ethics in mental health, open volume. http://www.jemh.ca/issues/v9/documents/jemh_openvolume_article_medically_unexplained_symptoms_and_mental_models_march2015.pdf issn: 1916-2405 kutchins, h., & kirk, s. (1997). making us crazy: dsm, the psychiatric bible and the creation of mental disorders. new york, ny: the free press. lewis, b. (2006). moving beyond prozac: dsm and the new psychiatry: the birth of postpsychiatry. ann arbor, mi: university of michigan press. lipowski, z. (1988). somatization: the concept and its clinical application. american journal of psychiatry, 14, 1358-1368. http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/dsm-5-0/requiem-dsm http://www.jemh.ca/issues/v9/documents/jemh_open-volume_article_medically_unexplained_symptoms_and_mental_models_march2015.pdf http://www.jemh.ca/issues/v9/documents/jemh_open-volume_article_medically_unexplained_symptoms_and_mental_models_march2015.pdf aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 14 macmillan, m. (1991). freud evaluated: the completed arc. amsterdam, the netherlands: elsevier. osnos, e. (2011). americanitis vs. chinitis. the new yorker. jan. 4, 2011. payer, l. (1989). medicine and culture. varieties of treatments in the united states, england, west germany, and france. new york, ny: penguin. ratcliffe, m. (2009). phenomenology, neuroscience, and intersubjectivity. in h. dreyfus & m. wrathall (eds.), a companion to existentialism and phenomenology (pp. 329-345). oxford, uk: blackwell. shorter, e. (1992). from paralysis to fatigue: a history of psychosomatic illness in the modern era. new york, ny: free press. shorter, e. (1997). a history of psychiatry. new york, ny: wiley. showalter, e. (1985). the female malady: women, madness and english culture, 1830-1980. new york, ny: pantheon books. shuster, d. (2003). neurasthenia and a modernizing america. journal of the american medical association, 290(17), 2327-2328. shuster, d. (2011). neurasthenic nation: america’s search for health, happiness, and comfort, 1869-1920. new brunswick, nj: rutgers university press. simmel, g. (1903/1997). the metropolis and mental life. in d. frisby & m. featherstone (eds.), simmel on culture ( pp. 174-186). london, uk: sage. taylor, c. (1985). self-interpreting animals. in philosophical papers: vol. 1. human agency and language (pp. 45-76). cambridge, uk: cambridge university press. u.s. department of health and human services. (1999). mental health: a report of the surgeon general. rockville, md: u.s. department of human services, substance abuse and mental health services administration, center for mental health services, national institutes of health, national institute of mental health. ware, n., & weiss, m. (1994). neurasthenia and the social construction of psychiatric knowledge. transcultural psychiatric research review, 31, 101-124. wessely , s. (1990). old wine in new bottles: neurasthenia and ‘me’. psychological medicine, 20, 35-53. young, r. (2003). patients like linda. journal of the american medical association, 290(2), 165-166. aho journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 6 15 microsoft word risser corrected proof introduction.docx corresponding author: james risser, phd seattle university email: jrisser@seattleu.edu journal of applied hermeneutics july 31, 2019 ãthe author(s) 2019 the difficulty of understanding: an introduction james risser abstract in june 2019, dr. james risser was the invited scholar for the canadian hermeneutic institute (chi), held in calgary, alberta, canada. dr. risser is a professor of philosophy at seattle university and the senior research fellow at western sydney university. he is also the editor of the journal research in phenomenology. he has held philosophy chairs and is a prolific writer of books and articles in the areas of continental philosophy and philosophical hermeneutics. this paper is the introduction to the three-day event of the chi, and his beginning introduction to his papers. it is followed by three papers entitled when words fail: on the power of language and human experience; speaking from silence: on the intimate relation between silence and speaking; and hearing the other: communication as shared life. keywords philosophical hermeneutics, hans-georg gadamer, understanding, communication i would like to begin with a few general remarks about the theory of understanding that is developed in the work of hans-georg gadamer, the philosopher who lived the entirety of the 20th century. he died in 2002 at the age of 102. his work is described as a philosophical hermeneutics because his theory of understanding is not developed as a method for understanding texts or as a method for the human sciences, as we see in classical hermeneutic theory. it is a philosophical hermeneutics in the way first demonstrated by martin heidegger, who showed how interpretation and understanding are basic to our apprehending of ourselves and the world. in his formulation of this broader dimension of hermeneutics, which he closely follows, gadamer will often speak of the universality of hermeneutics, or the universal aspect of hermeneutics. in his risser journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 5 2 essay, “on the origins of philosophical hermeneutics,” gadamer describes his hermeneutics in the following way: behind [the employment of methodological research] a much broader dimension opens up, one that is rooted in a fundamental linguisticality or language-relatedness. in all recognition of the world and orientation to the world, the element of understanding is to be worked out, and through this the universality of hermeneutics is to be demonstrated. (gadamer, 1985, p. 179) exactly how this understanding of the world is to be worked out becomes the distinguishing trait of gadamer’s hermeneutics. quite simply, it occurs in speaking-with-another and listening-toanother. indeed, understanding, for gadamer, is rooted in language, but such language is always the language of dialogue, of conversation, even when there is no actual other person you are speaking with. we are in a conversation, for example, when we try to understand a poem that we read to ourselves, or an artist’s painting that presents itself to our view. something addresses us and the task is to understanding the address. and in every hermeneutic conversation this address has the priority. put differently, every conversation aimed at understanding gives priority to the voice of the other.1 from a hermeneutics so conceived we can see why gadamer will say on multiple occasions that the experience of understanding is a communicative event. in his essays written after the publication of his main work, truth and method, gadamer will stress the basic implication of this communicative event. he writes: “the communality that we call human rests on the linguistic constitution of our life-world” (gadamer, 1985, p. 180). for gadamer, the experience of understanding is tied to the very way in which we are human and participate in what i have described elsewhere as “shared life.” with this basic outline of gadamer’s hermeneutics in view, we can now hopefully see what interpretive understandings are to be included in this understanding of the world. certainly it includes more than what we learn from art, history, and philosophy–the three disciplines named in truth and method where we can have an experience of understanding outside methodological research. it also includes the experience of understanding in the therapeutic situation, in nursing care, and in the classroom. when we consider what these experiences have in common, we might also begin to see something of the very nature of understanding. understanding is a distinctive kind of knowing. in understanding something one does not prove anything, or acquire facts, or even make logical arguments. when gadamer speaks about the experience of truth in art, he uses the language of recognition to describe the knowing that is understanding. but what is this? it is something like seeing, as when the student in the classroom says “oh, now i see.” that is the experience of understanding. understanding the world means to be able to see what is. to use another word for this experience, i would use the word “learning.” but this brings me to my point. as every therapist, nurse, and teacher knows–and for that matter, for anyone caught up in communicative understanding–the task of understanding is not without its difficulty. in speaking to and hearing others, we are never neutral, as if unshaped by our prior involvement in the world. we speak and listen from out of the experiences of our own lives and from the language that we already possess. so when we engage in the effort to understand we often talk at cross purposes or with words that mean little beyond the reach of our own hand. as gadamer often notes, coming to an understanding in conversation will require finding a common language that is never a fixed given. but more than this, we often find ourselves at a loss for words or caught up in silence that risser journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 5 3 seems to make understanding difficult, to say the least. and so we can say that hermeneutic experience is the experience of the difficulty that we encounter in hearing what the other has to say, which includes the other in us. each of the talks that i have prepared for these three days will address a difficulty in the task of understanding. references gadamer, h-g. (1985). on the origin of philosophical hermeneutics. in philosophical apprenticeships (r. sullivan, trans.; pp. 179-180). cambridge, ma: the mit press. gadamer, h-g. (1997). reflections on my philosophical journey. in l. hahn (ed.), the philosophy of hans-georg gadamer (p. 46). chicago, il: open court publishing. notes 1. in his “reflections on my philosophical journey,” gadamer describes how his hermeneutic philosophy is an attempt at countering the illusion of a full self-presence and selfconsciousness when it comes to understanding. while heidegger conveyed this counter position through the notion of thrownness, gadamer writes: “but what i had in mind was the special autonomy of the other person, and so quite logically i sought to ground the linguisticality of our orientation to the world in conversation” (gadamer, 1997, p. 46). corresponding author: tiffany a. beks, ba, msc email: tiffany.beks@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics june 5, 2018 the author(s) 2018 becoming the vulnerable neighbour: from trauma research to practice tiffany a. beks abstract in this article, i explore the relevancy and application of gadamerian hermeneutics and lévinasian philosophy (lévinas, 1991) as adapted by orange (2011) to the field of counselling psychology, with a focus on working with individuals who have experienced trauma. i begin by exploring an encounter that ignited my search for better understanding the suffering associated with traumatic betrayal in the context of military service, a journey which led me to an application of hermeneutics as a theoretical orientation in trauma counselling. i then examine gadamerian hermeneutics and lévinasian constructs with respect to how my practice was altered by this encounter and how my approach to working with survivors of trauma continually evolves. the review of gadamer’s constructs of dialogue and prejudice and orange’s hermeneutic sensibility brings me to new insights as to the application of hermeneutics in the context of counselling psychology and its associated work in trauma care. keywords hermeneutics, counselling psychology, trauma, psychology, qualitive research i can recall vividly the first time i became aware of the profound suffering experienced by veterans and their families in the aftermath of being betrayed by the military. i had nearly finished an interview with my first msc thesis research participant, a spouse of a veteran who had been suffering with post-traumatic stress disorder (ptsd) due to adverse events he experienced during a military deployment. the interview had focused on how spouses were affected by the veterans’ ptsd, as well as the barriers and facilitators spouses face in engaging with psychosocial supports and services in their community. “is there anything else you would like me to know before we end the interview?” i asked the standard question that typically beks journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 8 2 proceeds this type of interview, not expecting much more of a response than a signal that she had expressed everything she needed to say. at this point, i was already thinking about everything i had to prepare for a different meeting later that day. then, unexpectedly, my participant stated, “actually yes. this didn’t come up in the interview but, i have to say it.” her voice cracked. she fell silent for a moment. she began to cry. i was confused, concerned, and surprised. i thought: this is not how an interview ends. with uncertainty and anxiety, i encouraged her to continue. “i am forever talking my husband off a ledge. i am forever walking on eggshells, making sure he doesn’t take his life, avoiding triggering him, preventing angry outbursts. ptsd touches every part of our life. my kids are suffering with depression and anxiety now because he never got the help he needed. and not once have i ever been offered assistance or training from veterans affairs. my husband, my family, we have devoted our life to the military and the military destroyed him. but do you think they will take any responsibility? they promised to support injured veterans and their families, but instead they dismissed him from service, and then they abandoned us. and this…this was the ultimate betrayal.” i could feel my eyes well with tears. i was holding my pen so tight by this time i was shaking. shaking in anger, disgust, and sorrow. i did not know how to respond and so i remained silent. i have revisited this experience many times since because it represents the encounter that brought into question everything i thought i knew about trauma. the above narrative not only illustrates the potency of hermeneutic encounters, but it also represents the seedling of the transformation and sense of responsibility that is cultivated within researchers when they are guided by a topic and engage it care-fully (moules, venturato, laing, & field, 2017). it attends to the unpredictable, yet invaluable learning that takes place in coming to an understanding -the kind of learning that, paradoxically, leaves us speechless at a time when we feel the intense need to say something. it is also the kind of research “findings” that are rarely articulated in traditional dissertations or empirically-oriented journal articles but are of vital importance to our relationship with a topic and the lives and community it inhabits. this form of learning – coming to an understanding forms the foundation upon which we, as researchers and practitioners, become a vulnerable neighbour to the suffering stranger and establish a sense of commitment to a subject matter. although my hermeneutic encounter occurred within the context of counselling psychology research, it exerted a profound influence on how i orient myself in counselling practice, specifically toward those who have suffered trauma. gadamerian hermeneutics and lévinasian constructs offered a philosophy by which i could make sense of the way my practice was altered by this encounter and how my approach to working with survivors of trauma continually evolves. hence, the purpose of this article is not to demonstrate the application of hermeneutics in research, but to highlight how a hermeneutic encounter in research ignited a shift in my theoretical orientation toward counselling. throughout this article, i discuss how gadamerian hermeneutics and lévinasian constructs adapted by orange (2011) have informed my understanding of the work i do as an aspiring trauma-focused counselling psychologist. first, i discuss how the experience of being addressed by the topic called into question what i thought i knew about trauma. next, i offer a rationale for the relevance of hermeneutics to my practice as an emergent trauma counselling psychologist. in the final section, i describe the application of gadamer’s constructs of dialogue and prejudice and orange’s hermeneutic sensibility in the discipline of counselling psychology and its associated work in trauma care. beks journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 8 3 calling what is “known” into question: the address of the topic gadamerian philosophy asserts that a topic lives before we are aware of it and after we conceal it, but the place where our hermeneutic inquiry begins is likely when we are addressed by the topic (moules et al., 2015). an address is the experience of being caught off-guard, called, or summoned by something (moules et al., 2015). addresses come in the form of an interruption, a break through or, perhaps more so, a breakdown in our regular day-to-day life and routine, calling on us to listen, to be vulnerable, and to be open (moules et al., 2015). this opening to a topic allows us to be guided by its character, rather than previous reductions, labels, or categories we have ascribed to it (moules et al., 2015). when an address occurs, the topic matters to us and demands a response, a “servitude” imbued in morals and conscience (moules et al., 2015, p. 72). when a topic presents itself to us, parts of it are hidden and revealed at the same time, and consequently, it breeds questions about how to cultivate an understanding of what already exists (moules et al., 2015). gadamer might have said that our topics are partially concealed from us because of our own biases, beliefs, attitudes, background, and traditions (moules et al., 2015). furthermore, it is our engagement and participation in our practice and the topic itself that conceals and reveals aspects of the topic (moules et al., 2015). our day to day discourses that constitute our practice remain unquestioned, unexamined, and taken-for-granted until this routine is interrupted by an address. this address problematizes the taken-for-granted, calling on us to understand it differently and wholly (moules et al., 2015). as such, the address involves aletheia in that it is concerned with conserving, enlivening, and remembering something (moules et al., 2015). with gadamerian philosophy in mind, i revisit my experience of being addressed by the topic of the suffering experienced by veterans and their families in the aftermath of being betrayed by the military. according to moules et al. (2015), topics are often founded in our practice because, as practitioners, we suffer these things in our day to day work. as i actively listened to the narrative of the other (“participant”), i simultaneously understood that there was something about her and me, in this time and place, that created an emotional and psychological space that enabled and fostered a deepened sense of human and worldly connectedness. i felt inextricably linked not just to her and her story, but also society, its welfare, and the future of the world. even though the content of her story was heart-breaking, it felt good and right to be in that space with her and connect with her. i was absorbed with care care for the other, her pain, her family’s suffering, and the betrayal they endured by an institution to which they had devoted their lives. i felt a profound sense of injustice, a need to understand how this could happen, what it meant to her and her family, and the looming question: now what do i do about it? hearing her story transformed me as a researcher, counselling psychologist, and most importantly, a human being. she taught me about a world i did not know existed, a realm of experience i wanted to know more about. it was as if i had been called upon to devote the total sum of my energy to the topic of traumatic betrayal, and yet, at the same time, it energized me. it was through this dialogue and this experience we shared that this topic unfolded, far-removed from a literature review or from an objective, “rational,” logically deduced process. it did not feel as though i had “discovered” this issue, but rather that this topic greeted me and made itself accessible to me. it was almost as beks journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 8 4 if the topic itself was a living thing, and i held it with the same regard, responsiveness, and responsibility that i would another life. in reflecting upon my encounter with this topic, and in keeping with the principle of historicism, i must acknowledge a tradition in which i have been situated and entrenched. i am intrigued and passionate about working with individuals who have suffered trauma and with military families because the suffering associated with military service has been a part of my life since i experienced the “thrownness” (field, 2018) of the world at birth. i come from a long line of descendants who served in the military, and in many ways, my upbringing carries many military traditions, artifacts, and customs forward from the past into the present and future. a description of these traditions is beyond the scope of this article; however, the main point is that there exists an immutable relationship between my decision to focus on trauma in my counselling practice and my family’s military identity, history, and the suffering they have endured. it was not, however, until i began conducting research that my understanding of trauma was challenged. as my research participant shared her story with me, it was her perspective that caught me. it was fresh, new, and very different from my own. i had never thought about the actions of the military institution in the aftermath of traumatic military experiences, its impact on veterans and their family members. on the contrary, i had always thought about their suffering as a mental health condition, categorizing their behaviours and attaching a label in accordance with dominant psychiatric and diagnostic entities. the possibility of a different phenomenon at work sent shockwaves through me, jolted my perspective, and overturned what i thought i knew about trauma. for example, empirical studies have suggested that biological mechanisms may underly ptsd – that is, individuals may be genetically predisposed to develop ptsd based on their dna (i.e., genetic risk) and this structure may be passed down to offspring, resulting in an intergenerationally produced risk for ptsd (yehuda, & bierer, 2009). at the same time, when exposed to a particularly stressful environment, an individual’s genetic functioning may be altered (i.e., epigenetic trauma) and result in ptsd (yehuda, & bierer, 2009). this body of knowledge has contributed significantly to my understanding of trauma and its systemic occurrence within and across generations. yet, i was left wondering: given this new understanding of betrayal, how i do i make sense of trauma and its origins against the backdrop of my traditions? what other forms of trauma have been concealed by my theories and orientations toward human suffering? finally, how does this new perspective change the way i practice? through the experience described above, something taken-for-granted and never seen was enlivened through listening to the other. in the spirit of gadamerian philosophy, hermeneutic inquiry seeks to understand that which has been previously concealed (moules et al., 2015). furthermore, gadamerian philosophy emphasizes understanding in terms of practical wisdom and how it occurs in living examples (moules et al., 2015). this form of knowledge, phronesis, is cultivated in our everyday work (moules et al., 2015). said differently, it is through listening to the other that i come to an understanding of how i might respond better to the suffering associated with military trauma in my counselling research and practice. i now turn to the writings of orange (2011) who, in drawing upon gadamerian and lévinasian constructs, facilitated my understanding of the applicability of hermeneutic philosophy to the discipline of counselling psychology and its associated work in trauma care. beks journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 8 5 entering a hermeneutics of trauma and betrayal in this section, i provide a rationale for the relevance of hermeneutics to my practice as an emergent trauma counsellor. the rationale for selecting hermeneutics to guide my practice is grounded in three important assumptions. the first pertains to the idea that the practice of counselling psychology is inherently interpretive. the second pertains to the notion that counselling individuals who have suffered trauma requires a shift in our understanding of human distress. the third pertains to the notion that counselling psychologists engaging trauma work must expect to be changed by their practice. each of these revelations are described in greater detail below. counselling as an interpretive practice in the practice of counselling psychology, “interpretation is an omnipresent force that psychologists and clients alike must appreciate and revere” (klingle, 2015, p. 1). this means that interpretive practice is constantly at work as we search for understanding, not only with respect to the experiences of the other (commonly referred to as “client”), but also our own experiences. our interpretation and the interpretation brought by the other to the counselling session occurs within an interpersonal and intrapersonal relationship, the self and the other (klingle, 2015). further, interpretation is shaped by others and the world around us. the practice of counselling psychology can be thought of as a dialogue between the counsellor and the other that has potential to shape and transform both individuals (klingle, 2015). yet, this transformation depends on the extent to which counsellors are open to being transformed by our own experiences and by bearing witness to the narratives of the other. according to some of the major teachings underpinning counselling psychology as a practice and profession, interpretation is critical to the counselling relationship because interpretation itself is conceived as necessary for therapeutic change to occur (paré, 2013; patterson, 1974; porter, 1959). moreover, interpretation is viewed as a technique, a skilled art form that must be cultivated and offered carefully and sincerely, with the goal of deepening understanding for both parties (patterson, 1974). previous authors have suggested that the distinction between therapeutic reflection and interpretation lies in the motivation underpinning the interaction (paré, 2013; porter, 1959). hence, when a counsellor offers his or her perspective, this is merely the technique of reflection (klingle, 2015). in contrast, the interaction moves toward interpretation when the intention of an interaction, or offering, is to cultivate deeper understanding (klingle, 2015). however, i argue that therapeutic interpretation involves more than an intention to deepen understanding. as counselling psychologists, we must remain aware that we cannot escape the fact that interpretation is shaped by our beliefs, attitudes, biases, past experiences, and histories (klingle, 2015). thus, if the intention of therapeutic interpretation aims to deepen understanding, the historical, social, emotional, cognitive, and cultural context in which our perspective is rooted must be considered. furthermore, i offer a different perspective in that to deepen understanding is to question previous understandings and come to new understandings, for both the counsellor and the client. gadamer (2013) reminds of us the nature of transformation: beks journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 8 6 …transformation means that something is suddenly and as a whole something else, that this other transformed thing that it has become is its true being, in comparison with which its earlier being is nil. when we find someone transformed we mean precisely this, that he has become another person. (p. 115) thus, the interpretive practice of counselling psychology cultivates change and transformation as it transforms both the client and the counsellor. shifting perspectives on trauma and distress in drawing from lévinasian philosophy, orange (2011) stated that trauma is inherently relational, and that to be traumatized is a complex series of moments. the first moment is constitutive of the trauma (greek for injury) – the shocking, abusive, or neglectful occurrence – followed by the denial, hypocrisy, dismissal, and silencing both by the perpetrators and by others to whom the individual may have turned to for help. hence, trauma and betrayal are not distinct events, but are a complex, interconnected sequence of moments that occurs in the process of traumatization. according to orange, and of critical importance in working with traumatized individuals, we must shift our focus away from what is wrong with the person (i.e., the pathology) to what has happened to the person to result in such distress, a transformation referred to as “entering a hermeneutics of trauma” (p. 83). importantly, orange’s account of entering a hermeneutics of trauma parallels my experience of being addressed by the topic of betrayal in the context of military trauma. indeed, my perspective shifted from a focus on traumatization as a pathology to better understanding the betrayal that happens alongside trauma and its role in human suffering because i was confronted with a new perspective that challenged my own traditions. as such, i argue that a hermeneutic approach is necessary for guiding trauma counselling because to better understand the suffering of others and make their pain accessible, i must begin by understanding what within myself impedes my compassion, empathy, and care. clinical attitude and transformation according to orange (2011), in our work in trauma and the accompanying instances of betrayal, rejection, and disavowal experienced by trauma victims, it is necessary that counsellors both listen and expect to learn something from the traumatized other. this expectation shapes the attitude of counsellors working in the area of trauma. according to orange (2011), clinical care in the field of trauma must be guided by the needs of the other, the expectation that one will be questioned by the other with whom we seek understanding, the assumption that the other is surviving despite being wounded, and the presumption that the other is our partner in the search for meaning and understanding. the expectations and, by extension, the attitude described by orange echoes gadamerian philosophy and its emphasis on understanding through being with the other (field, 2018). given the importance of allowing oneself to learn from, and be changed by, the traumatized other, and the need for clinical trauma work to be guided by a caring and compassionate attitude, hermeneutic philosophy is an appropriate theoretical orientation for counsellors to take in working with those who have suffered forms of trauma, including betrayal. the suffering stranger: applied hermeneutics in trauma counselling beks journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 8 7 applied hermeneutics refers to the application of hermeneutics to the lived realities of professional practice disciplines (moules, mccaffrey, morck, & jardine, 2011). it offers a means to explore professional practice with respect to the inherent complexities and meanings, the dialogues of communal and self-understanding that occur, and how our practice occurs through language and tradition (moules et al., 2011). moules et al. (2011) reminds us that “our day to day work is hermeneutic in character” (p. 2). the practice of counselling psychology is a deeply interpretive discipline wherein the philosophy and method of hermeneutics is central to the work of practitioners (klingle, 2015; williams, 2017). an important responsibility of counselling psychologists is to remain abreast of new understandings that inform the way we practice and how we interact with clients – a responsibility that is codified in our ethical professional guidelines (canadian psychological association, 2017). in the context of clients who have suffered trauma, this ethic is extended, not just to include the responsibility to remain current about new understandings, but to remain accountable and ethical to clients through understanding their preand post-trauma reality. the experience of being traumatized is multi-faceted, touching the cultural, social, physical, spiritual, mental, and emotional fabric of our being (freyd & birrell, 2013). violations of trust and protection perpetrated by powerful and depended-upon institutions, such as the military, either concurrently or in the after-math of traumatic events, might be understood as an additional traumatic experience in its own right or as an event that cannot be separated from what it means to become traumatized (freyd & birrell, 2013). it is this emphasis on understanding the suffering of the other who has experienced concurrent or post-trauma betrayal, in an interpretive profession such as counselling psychology, that makes hermeneutics a fitting approach for coming-to-an-understanding of effective trauma care. in her book the suffering stranger, orange (2011) asserted that hermeneutics is a “clinical philosophy” (p. 15). according to orange, gadamerian philosophy reminds us that hermeneutics emphasizes a “readiness to listen to and learn from the voice of the other” (p. 15), meaning that the clinical practice of counselling psychologists calls on us to respond to the suffering of the other through dialogical understanding and a hermeneutic of trust. as counselling psychologists, we have an infinite responsibility to respond to the suffering stranger and let him/her teach us. it is this combination of dialogical understanding, in a hermeneutic of trust, that cultivates the response and infinite responsibility to the suffering other, a “hermeneutic clinical sensibility” (p. 3). in drawing from her own experience as clinical hermeneut, orange stated that the gadamerian constructs of dialogue and prejudice are continually at work in caring for those who are suffering from trauma. each of these constructs and their application to counselling psychology are briefly outlined below. gadamer thought that we can understand only from participating in conversation with the other, with the expectancy of learning from the other (orange, 2011). moreover, one should expect to be surprised or caught-off guard by the other and what one learns from the other. according to gadamer, we “fall into” conversation, without knowing the outcome or the path of the conversation (orange, 2011, p. 16). understanding (or not understanding) is an event that occurs. thus, the path is unpredictable. the construct of dialogue is important with respect to clinical practice, as our work can be thought of as an interpretive interaction between two human beings beks journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 8 8 (klingle, 2015; williams, 2017). for counselling psychologists to help clients, we must engage in dialogue – be it through spoken word, expressive arts, music, or an outdoor walk. through dialogue, we enter clients’ lives and experience and tap into the strands of their lives that have fallen into the background of, or completely disappeared from, the dominant narrative they bring to counselling. we reflect, make, and clarify meaning with our clients. it is our greatest hope that through this dialogue and meaning-making, that life flourishes. this means that dialogue is not a means to an end, but rather, dialogue is the meaning-making and the therapeutic ingredient of counselling (paré, 2013). hermeneutics recognizes that understandings “come from somewhere; they are not simply fabricated” (moules et al., 2015, p. 3). gadamer proposed that dialogical understanding takes place between worlds of experience steeped in traditions. this is, of course, the case in counselling practice, where counsellor and client encounter one another and represent two worlds of experience existing in the traditions in which we live (orange, 2011). we each bring to conversation a perspective that is historically built, and thus, it is crucial that we know ourselves, our perspectives, and our traditions better. in counselling practice, we must become astutely aware of our perspective, and appreciate that what occurs between counsellor and client is not void of perspective, beliefs, attitudes, history, or tradition. according to orange, this does not mean that we are to suspend our prejudices and traditions, but that we develop an ethic and integrity that requires richer and more far-reaching truthfulness with ourselves and with the other. in the words of gadamer: it is neither possible, necessary, nor desirable that we put ourselves within brackets. the hermeneutical attitude supposes only that we self-consciously designate our opinions and prejudices and qualify them as such, and in so doing strip them of their extreme character. in keeping to this attitude, we grant the text the opportunity to appear as an authentically different being and to manifest its own truth, over and against our own preconceived notions. (1987, p. 132) in counselling practice, awareness of the personal and therapeutic theories and traditions in which our practice is grounded, as well as our personal background (e.g., cultural, social, gender), outlines the margins of our perspectives and interpretations (orange, 2011). in so doing, we return to dialogue as it provides a corrective mechanism to our perspective, broadening and expanding it (orange, 2011). orange (2011) referred to the abovementioned elements as a “hermeneutic sensibility in everyday therapeutics” (p. 22). counselling as an activity is an endeavour to make contact with the other through language, and to articulate in words what comes to be understood with the other. counselling is the shared search for understanding. furthermore, orange reminds us that clinically-focused work is a matter of the hermeneutics of trust, in that we must allow the other the opportunity to educate us. counselling involves a willingness to see that the other may have a perspective, an idea, which we have been unsuccessful in understanding. furthermore, this hermeneutic attitude assumes that, as practitioners, we believe in the veracity, authenticity, and honesty of what the other is saying. finally, the hermeneutic attitude of trust does not assume that the other will trust us as a counsellor, given their history and background of betrayal, violence, and victimization. in turn, it is this attitude that guides our work with those who are beks journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 8 9 suffering and cultivates an environment in which the other may learn that he or she belongs and is safe. according to orange, interpretation is not synonymous with understanding, but rather interpretation makes the understanding explicit. in counselling practice, we must suspend our desire to be right, our theoretical orientations surrounding clients’ problems, and our assumptions about ourselves if we are to “hear the voice of the other” and let him or her teach us (p. 43). in the spirit of a clinical hermeneutic sensibility, orange (2011) called upon counsellors to better understand the parallels between traumatic suffering, clinical practice, and lévinasian philosophy. the hermeneutics of trauma, according to orange, means the clinician allows oneself to be traumatized by the suffering other. similarly, gadamerian philosophy reminds us that we belong to a common world, and belonging in a community means we are obligated to our neighbor. to be ethical in trauma care is to respond, and a response is a “refusal to be unmoved, or indifferent, to the face of the other” and the suffering of the other (p. 43). drawing from the lévinasian construct of incumbency, orange asserted that there is no time to decide whether the other is worthy of our care, our response; the other’s need rises above us, so that we are never in the place to judge. it is the needs of the other, “the suffering stranger” (p. 57), and a counsellor’s compassion and receptivity to suffering through dialogue, that is the purpose of the therapeutic relationship. furthermore, to conceal or misremember this responsibility is a collapse of ethical clinical work. through this compassion and receptivity to the suffering of the other, we take a risk in that we are then vulnerable, we suffer, and we become traumatized. orange claimed that our modern obsession with applying palpable tools and procedural interventions deters from the response that is most needed – that is, our willingness to respond by becoming traumatized by the suffering of the other and by coming to a shared understanding of the meaning of the trauma through our dialogue and own traumatization. the practice of counselling psychology and its associated work in traumatic suffering is deeply hermeneutic. through dialogue and interpretation, we strive to understand clients’ realities, perspectives, and suffering. in working with those who have endured trauma, counsellors are confronted with the responsibility to respond to the suffering of the other, and through a dialogical understanding, we too make ourselves vulnerable and are, in turn, traumatized. by taking this risk and responsibility, we gain self-understanding and mutual understanding. thus, a hermeneutic sensibility to working with those who have experienced trauma does not require one to relieve the suffering of the other, but to live with the other in their suffering. summary in this article, i have explored an encounter that ignited my search for better understanding the suffering associated with traumatic betrayal, a journey which led me to an application of hermeneutics as a theoretical orientation in trauma counselling. through this work, i have come to an understanding and an appreciation of counselling psychology as an interpretive practice, as well as the human concerns i attempt to understand and respond to in my counselling practice. our interpretation of the trepidations and suffering our clients bring to counselling informs the way we practice, and thus, each new encounter transforms us and we become a different counsellor than we were before. through hermeneutics, we approach the other with humility, curiosity, and a desire to learn, an attitude that parallels the practice of counselling. therefore, in applying a hermeneutic sensibility to my practice, i will attempt to live with the other who is beks journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 8 10 suffering the effects of trauma, to be the vulnerable neighbour, and through dialogue, search for a communal understanding of what it means to survive and flourish after trauma. references canadian psychological association. (2017). canadian code of ethics for psychologists (4th ed.). ottawa, on, canada: author. field, j. c. (2018). lecture on gadamer and grondin [class notes, eder-701]. calgary, ab, canada: university of calgary. freyd, j. j., & birrell, p. j. (2013). blind to betrayal: why we fool ourselves we aren't being fooled. hoboken, nj: john wiley & sons. gadamer, h.-g. (1987). the problem of historical consciousness. in p. rabinow & w. sullivan (eds.), interpretive social science: a second look (pp. 82-140). berkeley, ca: university of california press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/2013). truth and method (j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). london, uk: bloomsbury. klingle, k. (2015). batman and the sticky-fingered maiden: psychology as an interpretive practice. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 5. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca lévinas, e. (1991). totality and infinity: an essay on exteriority (3rd ed.). dordrecht, nl: kluwer academic publishers. moules, n. j., mccaffrey, g., field, j. c., & laing, c. m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. moules, n. j., mccaffrey, g., morck, a. c., & jardine, d. w. (2011). on applied hermeneutics and the work of the world. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 1. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah moules, n. j., venturato, l., laing, c. m., & field, j. c. (2017). is it really “yesterday’s war”? what gadamer has to say about what gets counted. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 1. retrieved from http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/index orange, d. m. (2011). the suffering stranger: hermeneutics for everyday clinical practice. new york, ny: routledge. paré, d. (2013). the practice of collaborative counseling and psychotherapy: developing skills in culturally mindful helping. thousand oaks, ca: sage. http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/ http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/index beks journal of applied hermeneutics 2018 article 8 11 patterson, c. h. (1974). relationship counseling and psychotherapy. new york, ny: harper & row. porter, e. h. (1959). critical incidents in psychotherapy. englewood cliffs, nj: prentice hall. williams, e. p. (2017). what should i do? what would you do? a counselling psychologist’s interpretation. emerging perspectives, 1(2), 1-5. retrieved from https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/ep/index yehuda, r., & bierer, l. (2009). the relevance of epigenetics to ptsd: implications for the dsm-v. journal of traumatic stress, 22(5), 427-434. doi:10.1002/jts.20448 https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/ep/index microsoft word purcell.docx corresponding author: sebastian purcell, phd assistant professor of philosophy suny cortland, ny email: sebastian.purcell@cortland.edu journal of applied hermeneutics june 5, 2012 the author 2012 translating god: derrida, ricoeur, kearney sebastian purcell abstract the purpose of the present essay is to defend two related notions. the more specific notion that i seek to defend is richard kearney’s conception of god as posse, of god as a possible god. his position has recently been criticized for three separate reasons: that it is not radical enough, that it is crypto-metaphysical, and that it forecloses the most profound aims of ethics. at a broader level what seems to be at stake is the opposition between partisans of radical finitude, those who hold that the most profound questions are encountered at the limits of thought, and an alternative “infinite” conception that kearney shares with paul ricoeur, which maintains that fidelity to unpredictable events opens the way to what is most profound about the human condition. in response, i argue that the criticisms fail to hit their mark because they presuppose a broadly derridean or post-modern position in order to make their argument, when it is just those presuppositions that are in question. keywords deconstruction, derrida, ethics, eros, events, finitude, god, hermeneutics, infinity, kearney, ricoeur, translation whether one chooses to lead one’s life by means of a belief in a god or not, and how one does so in light of such commitments, is a central existential and practical matter for anyone’s life. this question orients our sense of what goals we deem worthy of pursuing, what codes of conduct at least in part we deem necessary to observe, and above all it provides a distinct sense of our human place in the universe. perhaps it is for these reasons that one finds a broad public interest in question of religious belief in our modern world. richard dawkins and stephen hawking are but two of the most well-known of many recent authors to have engaged this topic.1 yet philosophy as a discipline has stood at some distance from this discussion, despite the clear public interest in it. the reason for this is that philosophical discussions on god tend to suffer from a fatal defect: they deadlock almost immediately. atheists are likely never to accept any proof for god’s existence, and theists are likely purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 2 never to accept that their proofs are incorrect. it would seem, as a result, that despite the public interest in the matter, there is little scholarly interest in it. as intense, personal, and practical as the discussion might be, it would appear that philosophy has almost nothing new to say about the topic. it is in light of this deadlock that continental philosophy as a whole, and hermeneutics in particular, has something of specific value to contribute. this tradition of thought has followed a path that søren kierkegaard and friedrich nietzsche opened. rather than pursue the question “does god exist?” it has instead pursued “what kind of god would be worth believing in, would be worth hoping for, should such a being exist?” this is the sort of question that theists and atheists alike can pursue, so that it does not result in an immediate deadlock, and it has equally proven to be of both scholarly and public value. charles taylor’s a secular age (2007), for example, has renewed this scholarly discussion, and hubert dreyfus and sean kelly’s all things shining (2011), which pursues a defense of polytheism on existentialist grounds, has become a national best seller. the key problem, when one takes up this approach, is what has come to be known as the problem “nihilism.” nietzsche’s (in)famous statement that “god is dead. god remains dead. and we have killed him.” compresses the two related aspects of this matter (1974, p. 181). one aspect concerns the annihilation of christian values, the fact that the christian god does not provide meaning for “western” culture as he did around 1500. the other concerns the distinct possibility that all our lives are but much sound and fury signifying nothing a total annihilation of meaning which might be termed the problem of absurdity. nietzsche and the tradition of continental philosophy following him, further linked both of these aspects to a metaphysical view on the world. the metaphysics of presence is a view on the world that is taken to be exemplified in the works of plato, aristotle, and st. thomas aquinas, and which at the same time gave rise to the scientific approach to reality that denies any place to existential meaning.2 it maintains that being is to be defined in terms of its presence, in terms of what it is here and now, in its actuality, and thus allows one to manipulate it maximally according to one’s best use of instrumental reason as one finds, for example in cost-benefit analysis. such a view on reality has no place for existential meaning. the implication for the philosophy of religion, then, is that even if one were to believe in god’s existence, one would have to do so within a framework that did not draw upon the traditional metaphysical accounts, on the metaphysics of presence, since it is just those accounts that resulted in both the secularization of our contemporary culture and the broader problem of absurdity in modern life. two of the most robust accounts of god that have been provided in response to the problem of nihilism are those by jacques derrida and richard kearney, though they have not thus far seen eye-to-eye. my specific aim of the present essay, then, is to provide a defense of two related philosophical notions. at one level, i seek to defend richard kearney’s conception of a possible god, god understood as “posse,” the god who may be, from some recent derridean criticisms, notably john caputo’s and mark dooley’s, which suggest that his conception belongs to the tradition of the metaphysics of presence. at a more general level, because the criticism kearney’s work has received is of a distinctively derridean kind, what is at stake in this defense concerns the viability of an alternative to derridean thought, the viability of a program of purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 3 thought that is not committed to radical finitude in the way that he is. insofar as derrida’s commitment to radical finitude may be understood to be shared by giorgio agamben, martin heidegger, even slavoj žižek, and insofar as kearney’s commitment to an alternative, one could call it: the program of infinite thought, is shared by thinkers as diverse as alain badiou and paul ricoeur, the stakes of this opposition are significant for continental philosophy as a whole, and not only the philosophy of religion.3 the argument that i pursue in what follows, then, makes the case both that there is a viable alternative to the program of radical finitude, and that kearney’s conception of god as “posse” is part of that alternative. one result of this argument is thus to suggest that it is not possible, as derrideans have done, simply to assume that because kearney does not share their basic philosophical commitments that his conclusions are misguided. a second result is that it might be possible to lead one’s life meaningfully if guided by a conception of god as posse, which, following kearney, entails an ethical task for human living, a kind of ethics of translation. because exegetical points have in some ways resulted in the current disagreement, the present investigation will be served well by proceeding slowly and with clarity. i begin, then, with a thorough review of the three charges that derrideans have leveled against kearney, specifically, and ricoeur, from whom he draws, more generally. 1. the three charges although kearney’s work has been discussed by other groups than derrideans or continental philosophers generally, to my mind it is the derridean critique that poses the most serious challenge.4 john caputo and mark dooley, while always friendly and appreciative in their responses, have made the strongest case in this regard. taken together, one finds that they have leveled three separate charges: that kearney’s work is not radical enough, that it is cryptometaphysical, and that it forecloses ethics, or at least the most profound point of ethical responsibility. i take up these charges each in turn. the first charge: not radical enough caputo has argued in a number of essays and in several presentations that kearney’s diacritical hermeneutics, along with ricoeur’s reflective hermeneutics, is simply not radical enough to twist free from the metaphysics of presence. he has made his case against ricoeur as early as radical hermeneutics (caputo, 1984) and has expanded it to include kearney in his more recent work (caputo, 2006, 2010, 2011). incidentally, i note that he is not the only derridean to argue that ricoeur failed to meet the challenge posed by the metaphysics of presence. to mention but one other prominent scholar on derrida who has addressed the relation of ricoeur and derrida one could look to leonard lawlor’s work (1992).5 this line of critique, then, broaches a deep tension between derrida and ricoeur, indeed to my mind, it broaches one of the most fundamental disagreements in contemporary continental philosophy, and i shall gesture in that direction below (section 3). nevertheless, i begin with the derridean criticism. caputo’s most recent argument is that the structure of kearney and ricoeur’s hermeneutics, whether diacritical or reflective, is too hegelian to countenance the possibility of events, and this is important because if correct, this means that kearney and ricoeur alike are committed to the metaphysics of presence.6 to recall, should that commitpurcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 4 ment turn out to be correct, then their proposed solutions to the problem of nihilism, and in particular their conceptions of god, would turn out to be part of that same problematic history. specifically, in response to kearney’s most recent attempt to find a way to mediate between theism and atheism in anatheism (kearney, 2010) caputo wrote: of course, richard kearney is interested in hermeneutics, not hegelian metaphysics, but the question is whether [kearney’s] diacritical hermeneutics does not have a hegelian imprint. are not hegel and kearney both writing their own de trinitate? in a hermeneutics more radically conceived [i.e., caputo’s own], where things are deeply at risk, belief and unbelief are not parts or moments in or in any way contributors to a third position one step removed. their momentum is never allowed to unfold or even get off the ground. … instead of 1,2,3 we encounter the innumerable. the binary of theism and atheism is displaced, has not earned the right to reconciliation.…this is not simply a “negative” operation, for the displacement of these “positions” exposes a more radical “affirmation,” a risky affirmation, a hope against hope, which is inscribed in a more fundamental undecidability that bests both of them. (caputo, 2011, p. 62) caputo’s argument is thus that kearney and ricoeur both retain a certain hegelian structure in their thought, that they are “closet hegelian[s]” (caputo, 2011, p. 61). caputo’s own derridean position, by contrast, avoids the metaphysics of presence because it remains open to a “risky” possibility; it is open to the notion that being/reality is not to be understood entirely in terms of presence, but also in terms of events, or radically unpredictable reconfigurations of being. kearney and ricoeur’s hegelianism is problematic not because it forecloses certain risks why should one value riskiness for its own sake? but because in that foreclosure of risk, this structure of thinking has no place for events, no place for the “perhaps” that escapes the metaphysics of presence, the “perhaps” that “is the necessary condition of possibility of every experience which is truly an ‘experience,’ which means that it arises from the unpredictable otherness of the future and shatters our horizons of expectation, which is what [derrida] means by the possibility of the impossible” (caputo, 2011, p. 59). this “perhaps,” this possibility of impossibility, is just the derridean concept of event: “[t]here the word peut-être cuts deeply into the name of god, so that god is in the very element of the peut-être, the ‘event’ of the promise which is no less a promise/threat, of the maybe which is also a maybe not” (caputo, 2011, p. 59). in short, kearney and ricoeur are not radical enough for the following reasons: they retain a hegelian structure to their thought, and that structure forecloses the possibility of the event, yet one must remain open to the event, because it is only in this way that one can avoid commitment to the metaphysics of presence. the second charge: crypto-metaphysics the charge that kearney and ricoeur are closet hegelians might be one way to argue that they are crypto-metaphysicians, but when caputo levels this charge against kearney in particular, he has something more specific in mind. in the god who may be (kearney, 2001), kearney’s goal is to mediate between the metaphysical conception of god understood, as aquinas wrote, as ipsum esse per se subsistens, and the more personal, eschatological god of the prophets in the bible, the god of abraham purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 5 and issac, even jesus, who seems to be little encumbered with metaphysical terminology. he does this by reconceiving god in terms of a sense of possibility beyond, or more profound than, the metaphysical alternatives of potency and act, that is to say, he reconceives god in terms of posse. given this aim, caputo argues that there is no real incompatibility between the two conceptions, and that kearney’s “posse” thus turns out to do no more than “update” traditional scholastic accounts of god. caputo wrote: it seems to me that there is no real incompatibility between the eschatological and the metaphysical concepts of god which richard distinguishes. there is no reason that god as such, god quoad se, as aquinas would put it, or god “an sich,” as kant would put it, could not also be pure act, actus purus, the god who “is” through and through without a trace of potency, while god quoad nos, or für uns, god in terms of our experience of god in time and history, is the god who may be. …. exactly how far is diacritical from dialectical? (caputo, 2011, p. 59) for caputo, none of kearney’s ideas are open to the maybe/maybe not, the peut-être of god as event, as khora. as a result, when kearney proposes a new concept, such as “posse,” he is not twisting free from a metaphysical approach to god, from the metaphysics of presence, he is simply “updating it,” by providing another list of qualities that would presumably stand alongside thomas’s categories. even though he claims to be going beyond metaphysics, then, he is really just doing a more modern form of it. the third charge: foreclosing ethics the final charge, which one finds in both caputo and dooley’s essays, is that the way in which kearney attempts to mediate positions, his call for ethical discernment, forecloses the more radical ethics to which deconstruction remains open, to which any philosophy that escapes the metaphysics of presence must remain open. caputo put it as follows: richard takes up this question of the “monstrous” name of khora in strangers, gods, and monsters, where i think his complaint is that when all is said and done khora cannot be trusted. but that i think is precisely what the poetics of the im/possible implies, that the conditions under which we trust also undermine our trust, so that trust is trust in a radical “perhaps,” a god who may or may not be, who may or may not be trusted, which is after all what “perhaps” must surely mean, even as a trust that is completely trustworthy is no trust at all but a surety. (caputo, 2011, p. 60) dooley understands kearney in a similar way. he characterizes kearney’s criticism of postmodernism, of deconstruction, in this way: when “one opts for the postmodern suspension of the ‘appearance-reality distinction,’ one leaves oneself without scope to judge between good and bad. once, in other words, one abolishes all notions of reference and representation, one succumbs to ‘narrative irresponsibility’ since one cannot differentiate good from bad narratives” (dooley, 2007, p. 161). yet, like caputo, dooley argues that by remaining committed to ideas such as “reference” or “representation” kearney “remains captive, in spite of himself, to a view of the self and the world that is residually ‘foundational’” (dooley, 2007, p. 166). the foundation in this case ought to be understood as some form of ethical presence, a certainty, an unrisky, uneventful, definitely the case and not a perhaps/perhaps not. purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 6 to sum up: kearney’s ethical imagination remains ethical only in the pale, bland, metaphysical way, along with all the other concepts he has developed, and though he has tried to think beyond the metaphysics of presence, despite himself, he always ends up slipping back into it. furthermore, it is precisely his idea (the very idea) of ethical discernment between good and bad that prevents him from recognizing the more radical demands of a possible ethics beyond, or at the limits of the metaphysics of presence. 2. ricoeur’s reflective hermeneutics my basic point is that derrideans have simply failed to understand kearney and the ricoeurian pattern of thought (not hegelian) that is present in his work. once that pattern is illuminated, once it is understood on its own terms and not derridean ones, it seems to me that the multiple ways in which their criticisms beg the question will be rather clear. i begin my defense, then, with a reconstruction of ricoeur’s thought and the pattern at work in it in order to illuminate what kearney draws from his thought. in his late exchange with the neuroscientist jean-pierre changeaux, ricoeur gives us the key to understanding the continuity of his thought. there, he suggests that phenomenology and hermeneutics form only two parts of his three-part method, stating: “i want to make my position clear at the outset. i am a partisan of a current of european philosophy that contains three distinctive approaches, typically referred to as ‘reflective philosophy,’ ‘phenomenology,’ and ‘hermeneutics’” (ricoeur, 2000, p. 4). in fact, it is ricoeur’s commitment to reflective philosophy that enables him to unify phenomenology and hermeneutics, to graft the branch of the latter onto the tree of the former. it is because philosophical reflection plays this unifying role that i believe his kind of hermeneutics is most aptly titled a reflective hermeneutics. when viewed in this light, one sees that ricoeur’s central methodological piece is one on the philosophy of reflection, specifically his essay “nabert on act and sign” (ricoeur 1972). the central points for ricoeur’s thought are the following. nabert argues (at least as ricoeur interprets him) that there is a distinction between conscious acts and the representation of those conscious acts in signs. there is a difference between, for example, perceiving the coffee mug on my desk and stating: “there is a coffee mug on my desk.” the latter case represents the conscious act by way of signs. nabert, however, does not understand this representation of conscious acts in signs as an impediment to knowledge, since they rather complete (aufhebet) the conscious acts, enriching them with a sense they did not and could not have on their own. representation by signs, then, becomes a necessary form of mediation on the way to knowledge, rather than an impediment. at this point, when one recognizes the productive role of the signifying representation of conscious acts, one has begun on the arc of philosophical reflection. signs call out for interpretation; they are not always self-evident. hermeneutics, understood as the art of interpretation, thus becomes constitutive of reflective philosophy. in this way it is elevated from a regional discipline, which addressed sacred texts, to one of general philosophical import. this approach makes ricoeur’s hermeneutics fundamentally different from either heidegger’s or gadamer’s insofar as he does not attempt to “dig under” the ontical disciplines, such as logic, mathematics, or science in particular linguistics but instead attempts to traverse them. his reflective hermeneutics is not about a fundamental pre-understanding, a horizion or back-drop purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 7 of understanding that needs to be in place in order to make sense of those sciences. reflective hermeneutics is instead posterior to the sciences, rather than prior, for it is the conflict of interpretations among these regional disciplines that gives rise to the need for hermeneutics. one reflects on these conflicts in order to complete one’s intentional conscious experience. how that interpretation is to be carried out, and how it is to be related, tested, with respect to the original phenomenological evidence are the questions that formed the task of ricoeur’s intellectual career. a caveat is necessary at this point in order to understand one of kearney’s more significant departures from ricoeur. ricoeur’s understanding of phenomenology was such that he never agreed with levinas that the other, the experience of the secondperson intention, maintained priority over one’s first-person conscious experience. in his late the course of recognition, ricoeur addresses the relation of husserl to levinas as follows: one version, that of husserl in his cartesian meditations, remains a phenomenology of perception. in this sense, his approach is theoretical. the other, that of levinas, in totality and infinity and otherwise than being or beyond essence, is straightforwardly ethical and, by implication, anti-ontological. both approaches have their legitimacy, and my argument here does not require us to decide in favor of one or the other of them. (ricoeur, 2005, p. 154) for ricoeur, the opposition is one that results from a choice about methodological origin, and could not be decided simply by averting to the phenomena. below i review kearney’s significant departure from ricoeur on this matter. returning to the general schema of ricoeur’s thought, one notes that the result of these methodological commitments is that the hermeneutic arc of any of ricoeur’s investigations is sustained by reflecting on a specific kind of meaning, and in the course of his career he provided three specific models of such meaning: the symbol, the text, and translation. i shall not here pursue the details of all these models, because it is only the model of translation that is necessary for understanding kearney’s sense of a possible god god as posse. in his brief work entitled on translation, ricoeur stated that the problem of translation may be taken in two ways: “either take the term ‘translation’ in the strict sense of the transfer of a spoken message from one language to another or take it in the broad sense as synonymous with the interpretation of any meaningful whole within the same speech community” (ricoeur, 2006, p. 11). there is a specific point concerning translation in the narrow sense that is pertinent to translation in the wider sense, namely the “construction of comparables” (ricoeur, 2006, p. 34). after one gives up the romantic ideal of perfect translation, it is possible to recognize that it is the work of translation that establishes the equivalent terms between languages. ricoeur’s paradigm case in this regard is established by reflecting on the french sinologist françois jullien, who argues “that chinese is the absolute other of greek that knowledge of the inside of chinese amounts to a deconstruction of what is outside, of what is exterior, i.e. thinking and speaking greek” (ricoeur, 2006, p. 36). ricoeur does not dispute jullien’s point, but rather points out that in order to make his case, jullien must engage in a construction of equivalent but not identical terms, especially with regard to the tenses (or lack thereof) of chinese verbs. this construction is just what ricoeur means by the construcpurcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 8 tion of comparables. moving across (translatum) from one untranslatable language to another is made practically possible by the construction of comparable, though not identical, terms, by an equivalence without identity. ricoeur takes this as a general hermeneutic method of reflection for relating, without equating, two mutually incompatible domains of sense, such as cultural and personal memory, or (as kearney pursues) christian and hindu conceptions of god. this traversal through the conflict of interpretations, especially by means of the model of translation, sets up ricoeur’s approach to metaphysics. this terminal point in ricoeur’s hermeneutic arc is import, since i need to demonstrate that ricoeur was in fact a metaphysical philosopher and not just a philosopher of language in order to respond to the derridean charge that ricoeur and kearney could not avoid being metaphysicians of presence, since they only ever discuss linguistic meaning. ricoeur always maintained that in order to complete the arc of hermeneutical reflection it was necessary not only to travers the existing conflicts of interpretation, but to take the results back to their ontological root, to follow the referent of the symbols, metaphors, texts, and translations back to being itself. in principle, this sort of project could address any form of being, so that the arc of reflection could be completed by returning to the being indicated by physical or mathematical equations. don ihde has, for example, shown how ricoeur’s approach to hermeneutics lends itself quite fruitfully to an analysis of contemporary science and technology (see idhe, 1993, 1998). that domain of investigation, however, was not ricoeur’s concern. rather, since the very beginning of his work, he was concerned with the ontology of human beings, with elaborating a philosophical anthropology. it is for this reason that the kind of being ricoeur was interested in was being as capability. in memory, history, forgetting he puts it thus: as we read in aristotle’s well-known declaration in metaphysics 4.2: “there are many sense in which a thing may be said to be.” i have argued elsewhere on the basis of this aristotelian warning in exploring the resources of the interpretation that, among the various acceptations, privileges that being as act and as power on the plane of a philosophical anthropology: it is in this way that i propose in the course of the present chapter to hold “the power to remember” (le pouvoir faire mémoire) to be one of these powers along with the power to speak, the power to act, the power to recount, the power to be imputable with respect to one’s actions as their genuine author. (ricoeur, 2004, p. 343-344) in his work on recognition, ricoeur adds a sixth power to the list: the power to recognize and be recognized. this last is a sort of meta-capability, since it is by mutually recognizing one another that one in fact develops capacities. “[i]t is a question,” ricoeur writes, “of seeking in the development of conflictual interactions the source for a parallel enlargening of the individual capacities” (ricoeur, 2005, p. 187). this six-fold list is ricoeur’s response to heidegger’s existentials in being and time and his correction of the kantian categories, since in the former case, ricoeur maintains that heidegger’s account remains untested by the conflict of interpretations, and in the latter, one must note that none of these capacities may be understood to apply to natural beings, such as rocks or trees, so that kant’s categories prove to be far too broad to correctly explicate the human condition. they thus stand as a significant contribution to the ontology of our human condition, and prove equally that purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 9 ricoeur’s reflective hermeneutics does address being and not just language. i now turn to develop how this ontology escapes the legacy of the metaphysics of presence. 3. not radical enough? one of the basic criticisms of ricoeur and kearney’s hermeneutics is that it is not radical enough, that it is not open to the event, the unforeseeable, unpredictable, impossible possibility. this charge, then, amounts to the point that any hermeneutics following a ricoeurian structure is too hegelian (which is a point of contact i have provocatively courted in the foregoing) to twist-free from the metaphysics of presence. having presented the foregoing on ricoeur, it seems to me that i could respond to this charge in either of two ways: by means of what might be called an adequate account argument, or by means of a similar adequate inference argument. by these arguments i intend the following. adequate account argument: this is the stronger of the two responses. it argues that in the contemporary discourse of continental philosophy there are two broad accounts of events: one, the derridean-heideggerian account, has two parts, and one, which ricoeur, kearney and others (including most notably alain badiou) maintain, which has three parts. next, it argues that the two-part account is unworkable, but the three-part account is not. this argument, in short, seeks both to establish what an adequate account of events would look like, and that the derridean conception is inadequate given those criteria, while the ricoeurian conception is adequate. hence the title: it is an argument about which account of events is most adequate, given the shared aim of twisting-free from the metaphysics of presence. adequate inference argument: this is the weaker of the two responses. it argues that there are, in the contemporary discourse of continental philosophy, two broad accounts of events. one of these, the derridean-heideggerian, has a twopart structure, while another, the ricoeurian (and kearneyan, and badiousian), has a three-part structure. next, rather than settle which side has a better conception of events, the argument moves to establish the weaker claim that it is unwarranted simply to presuppose that one account is correct and then charge the other side with failing to conform to one’s presupposition. to do so would be to engage, rather straightforwardly, in begging the question. yet, when caputo, or lawlor, or dooley accuse ricoeur or kearney of failing to be sufficiently radical, their argument amounts just to the charge that ricoeur and kearney’s conception of events does not conform to the two-part structure one finds in derrida’s thought. in doing so, as a result, they beg the question, since what needs to be established is whether that conception of events is the correct one. to sum up, this argument concerns the (in)adequacy of the derridean’s inferences, while the former is an argument about the (in)adequacy of the derridean account of events. while i maintain that the conclusions of the adequate account argument are warranted,7 establishing that claim is both more involved than the space i have available for the present essay, and it is something that i have already explored (to some extent at least) in some of my other pieces.8 for the present essay, then, i think it is enough to make the case for the adequate inference argument. the character of the present defense, as a result, leaves one with a choice between two approaches to events, to god purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 10 even, but i do not think that this decision is one that is groundless, or one that will remain unresolved. rather it looks to me as though a new field for research is opened, and that some fruitful discussion is likely to follow. for the present, i content myself with making the case that there is a need for this discussion. in order to make my case, i begin with the point that is common to both alternatives, namely that in the contemporary discourse of continental philosophy there are two broad accounts of events. since derrideans have overlooked or misunderstood the alternative account, the one found in ricoeur’s thought, i begin with it. in the conclusion to the symbolism of evil (ricoeur 1967), a relatively early work, ricoeur outlined a three part process for the recovery of symbols. [i] i wager that i shall have a better understanding of man and of the bond between the being of man and the being of all beings if i follow the indication of symbolic thought. that wager then becomes [ii] the task of verifying my wager and saturating it, so to speak, with intelligibility. in return, the task [iii] transforms my wager: in betting on the significance of the symbolic world, i bet at the same time that my wager will be restored to me in the power of reflection, in the element of coherent discourse. (ricoeur, 1967, p. 355) to summarize, the process has three parts: a wager, verification, and transformation. the wager itself is a wager on symbolic meaning, that is to say, meaning that is not present in the semantics of ordinary, dictionary sense. to use a little terminology from alain badiou, symbolic meaning “inexists” in the structure of sense; it exists in the structure of univocal semantics precisely as that which is excluded from it (badiou, 2009, p. 153). because it does not clearly exist as something literally meaningful, because one can imagine logical positivists dismissing the investigation of “evil” in the bible as nonsense, one must wager that it does exist. second, one must act, one must do something to bring about this meaning, and this is the process of verification. the long detour through the conflict of interpretations just is this process of verification, of truth-making. finally, if successful, this process will have brought a new kind of meaning into existence, so that my wager is transformed, so that the world of dictionary sense is displaced. this is a structure that ricoeur maintains for all his models of sense; it holds just as much for the new sense provided by symbols as it does for that provided by texts, or for that provided by translation. at the same time, because it is always possible to follow the referent of any sign to its ontological base, each of these ruptures in the established order of sense, (symbolically, textually, translatively) is at the same time a rupture in the order of being. in each case, utterly new and unpredictable forms of meaning and being are brought fourth. they are, in short, events. what this structure describes, then, is just how events occur and are completed. it is this three-part structure (wager, verification, and transformation), which moves through representations rather than trying to subvert, “dig under,” or displace them, that is intended by the “infinite” structure of events. derridean (radically finite) events, by contrast, have only two parts. the first of these is the recognition of an in-existent, the structure of included exclusion, heidegger’s no-thing, derrida’s supplement, in the structure of signification. next one takes a step to the recognition of something “beyond,” purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 11 something “older” than the supplement, “‘older’ than presence and the system of truth, older than ‘history’” (derrida 1973, p. 103). or in derrida’s later work, one comes to recognize the surprise of the incoming of the other, of the unpredictable, im-possible, unforseable, radical break in meaning and being that is an event (heidegger’s ereignis). one does not verify the event, for derrida, since to do so would be to presuppose what the event was, to reduce its riskiness by naming it, and thereby betraying its very character as an event. where ricoeur’s account differs from the derridean account of events concerns the role of agency. for derrideans, ricoeur’s (or kearney’s, or badiou’s) mediations are an attempt to gain control over the unpredictability of events, to lessen their riskiness. yet for ricoeur, events simply do not come into being on their own or at least not all of them.9 for human events, and for the assessing (the working-through) of non-human events, a certain kind of agency is necessary to foster their transformation this is the process of verification, of truth-making. mediation completes the events, not by bringing them into some higher dialectical synthesis, but by allowing them to happen this is the ricoeurian sense of “aufhebung.” one might say, then, that more risk is involved in ricoeur’s approach to events than derrida’s, since in ricoeur’s approach one must commit oneself to the fostering, to the be-coming of events, while in derrida’s approach, one only tries to prepare the way to the recognition of the radical unpredictability of their occurrence no agency is necessary to make them happen. to put it another way: for derrida, the risk involved with events concerns their unknowability, in assenting to a radically unknown, for ricoeur the risk involved with events concerns one’s own actions, concerns acting on behalf of an unknown. one account of events has two parts, then, another three parts. both are committed to the twisting-free from the metaphysics of presence, but each attempts to do so in different ways. i do think that ricoeur’s approach is the only workable one, but the foregoing suggests a more modest conclusion: that derrideans cannot charge ricoeurians of being insufficiently radical, measured by their own standards, when it is the adequacy of their standard that is the point of contention. in a similar way, they cannot accuse ricoeurians of shirking from risk, when the sense of “risk” is the point of contention. in short, their argument presupposes their point of view’s correctness in order to make its claim, but it is their presuppositions that have yet to be established. the charge of insufficient radicality, as a result, does not appear to be sustainable, either for ricoeur or kearney, since both are committed to this three-part structure. 4. diacritical hermeneutics while i have spent some time reviewing ricoeur’s thought, with the intention of defending kearney’s work, one should not understand kearney to be engaged some sort of application of ricoeur’s general principles. what kearney accepts from ricoeur is two-fold: a commitment to a three-fold structure for events (which he shares as much with badiou as he does with ricoeur), and the way that ricoeur “grafts” hermeneutics onto phenomenology, namely by beginning with phenomenological consciousness, moving through a conflict of interpretations, and then returning to a refigured consciousness. his disagreements are at least threefold: he entirely re-characterizes the arc of hermeneutic reflection, he broadens ricoeur’s account of narrative, and he redresses ricoeur’s l’homme capable by introducing the capacity for eros. any of these points, i believe, put him rather deeply at odds with purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 12 ricoeurians, and as one will note, they are mutually interdependent claims. kearney’s general correction of ricoeur’s reflective hermeneutics consists in the argument that the choice between levinas and husserl on the priority of the other is not merely a matter of methodological origin, as ricoeur maintained.10 for kearney, levinas was right in one capital sense: the presence of the other disrupts first-person consciousness in an irreducible, irrecoverable way: “[t]he rejection of relative otherness in favor of absolute otherness, by levinas and other thinkers of radical alterity, marks a decisive ‘break’ between thought and language” (kearney, 2003, p. 16). furthermore, once acknowledged, this break, this disruption of consciousness and language indicates that one has a responsability to the other, a capacity for ethical response. kearney wrote: “[t]he basic aim of diacritical hermeneutics is, i suggest, to make us more hospitable to strangers, gods and monsters without succumbing to mystique or madness” (kearney, 2003, p. 18). ricoeur, of course, recognizes one’s capacity for moral imputation as one of the basic capabilities of human beings, but kearney draws a deeper lesson from levinas. what levinas’ phenomenologies indicate for kearney is that one does not begin only with phenomenological consciousness, which must then pass through the conflict of interpretations, so that it can finally return to some ontological dimension. rather, one begins with an ethical, phenomenological consciousness, which gives rise to a conflict of interpretations, and returns to an ontology. the trajectory of hermeneutic reflection, then, is sustained from beginning to end by an ethical obligation. one cannot, as a result, mediate among conflicting interpretations by simple appeal to rational or logical criteria. rather, such mediation must always pass by way of an ethically evaluative moment. the criticism of dia-critical hermeneutics is sustained, is completed, only by averting to the demands of an original ethical intention. this point has rather significant implications for the status of events for kearney. while his thought still follows the “infinite” model of events by retaining a three-part structure, the agentive aspect of events for kearney is always ethical. veri-fication, what ricoeur calls truth as attestation at certain points, is an ethical practice. one cannot divorce the most profound sense of truth from ethical activity. it is in this way that he maintains the levinasian thesis that ethics is first philosophy, and he does so without the need to commit himself to some form of absolute asymmetry, or “madness” as he puts it. for ricoeur, a kind of rational completion of events allows them to happen, while for kearney this completion (aufhebung) is always ethical. my hope is that these points should clarify how kearney could respond to dooley’s concern (the third charge) that kearney is not open to the most profound call of ethics. dooley sees a sort of “shrinking back from the abyss” in kearney’s insistence that mediation, that completion, of opposed positions in the conflict of interpretation always remain subordinated to an ethical intention. god might be monstrous after all, and so could the stranger, he seems to suggest. yet, in making such an argument, dooley is clearly presupposing the derridean two-part account of events, wherein the greatest challenge, the greatest risk, concerns assenting to an utterly unknowable. for kearney, the risk of response requires agency, and this agency is only possible by living together, by our respons-ability, and so is only possible in a broadly ethical way. kearney’s ethics, then, in no way forecloses the most profound challenges of ethical response, but rather it opens a way to it. purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 13 even with this rather substantial modification to ricoeur’s thought, kearney innovates in other significant ways. to begin, his general correction of ricoeur’s hermeneutics results in a process of hermeneutical thought that at a more specific level acts as if it were a correction of ricoeur’s model of translation. i write that it acts “as if” it were a correction of the translative model, since kearney developed his own account before ricoeur completed his account of translation. the “correction” that i suggest, then, is for the sake of illustration, and so is warranted only by its ability to illuminate the significance of kearney’s departure ricoeur. one may think of it in the following way. in both the god who may be and anatheism, kearney undertakes to mediate hermeneutically (diacritically) between two seemingly untranslatable poles: in the former case, he mediates between the scholastic conception of god as ipsum esse subsistens (thomas aquinas’ interpretation of exodus 3:14 “i am who am”) and new eschatological conceptions, while in the latter case, he mediates between a naïve theism and a postmodern atheism. the work of these works consists in something like the construction of comparables, in the construction of an equivalence without identity. in the former case, the comparable term that kearney constructs is god understood as posse, while in the latter it is, quite obviously, anatheism (kearney, 2003, p. 98; kearney, 2010, p. 6). incidentally, one might note that kearney has taken a similar approach in his hosting the stranger (kearney & taylor, 2011) collection, in which the latin “hostis,” meaning both guest and host, becomes the comparable term for translating between untranslatable and irreconcilable cultural differences, such as the opposition between israelis and palestinians. this analogy with ricoeur’s thought, however, only carries one so far, since kearney is not content simply to construct a term that functions as an equivalence without identity. although he does provide specific terms, such as posse or anatheism, to identify his projects, what kearney in fact designates by these terms is a comparable narrative. unlike ricoeur, kearney maintains that narratives are their own model of sense they are not simply a form of textual meaning as ricoeur thinks. it is just this point that kearney explores in on stories (kearney 2002), which is part of the trilogy that includes the god who may be (kearney 2001) and strangers, gods, and monsters (kearney 2003). it is by mediating irreconcilable narratives, by translating them, that kearney undertakes to reconcile (without identifying or synthesizing) opposed religious traditions, or even theists and atheists. it is in this sense that kearney’s religious, diacritical hermeneutics, which consists of constructing comparable narratives between untranslatable positions, and which is always carried out by means of the ethical demand, may be considered a project that aims at translating god. a third and final significant departure from ricoeur’s thought that i see in kearney’s work concerns the role of desire, of eros. it is a remarkable point that among ricoeur’s fundamental human capabilities he does not include the capacity for eros or love more generally. yet, since kearney is committed to the levinasian point that the ethical intention fundamentally transforms one’s phenomenal consciousness, and because levinas maintained that eros was one of the ways to try to complete this ethical intention, it is perhaps unsurprising that kearney would move to include eros as a fundamental feature of our ethical responsibility. the centrality of eros to kearney’s thought is something that patrick burke has identified (burke, 2011), and it is a point with which kearney has explicitly agreed purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 14 (kearney, 2011a). despite his commitments to levinas, however, kearney does not develop his account of eros in a levinasian way. while kearney has explored the topic of eros in a number of ways, what i think is most important for the present essay is the way in which eros functions for him as a model for ethical discernment without formal criteria.11 in the tradition of virtue ethics it is the phronimos, the man of practical wisdom, who is able to make discerning judgments without formal criteria. for kearney, it is the lover. one of the more significant differences between these two sorts of person is the way in which the lover is open to excessive actions that the man of practical wisdom’s moderation would not allow. nowhere is this point clearer than in kearney’s analysis of the shulamite woman in the song of songs. this biblical chant uses powerfully charged erotic imagery. kearney wrote: the amorous verses [defy] any purely allegorical interpretation: “his left arm is under my head and his right makes love to me (2:6 and 8:2); he “pastures his flock” among the lilies (6:3); his “fountain makes the garden fertile” (4:15); or “my beloved thrust his hand/through the hole in the door; / i trembled to the core of my being” (5:4). doesn’t get much hotter than that. …this kind of language was, according to andré lacocque, almost unprecedented in the bible. and it was to prove so controversial in the later rabbinical and christian monastic traditions as to be frequently laundered, chastened, or censored. (kearney, 2003, p. 56) yet it is not only that the language is one that courts excess, nor is it even the case that this biblical chant is a woman’s song, above all kearney argues: “the shulamite’s passion represents free love—she is faithful to her lover ‘outside matrimonial bonds and social demands’ (e.g., demands to remain a servant, wife, child-bearer, mother, or commercial exchange object)” (kearney 2003, p. 57). the lover is thus a model for ethical discernment without formal criteria because in a loving relation one responds automatically, without thinking, to the needs, the demands of one’s beloved. in the loving relation, one has no need either of deontological universalizing criteria or a list of ten commandments (love your beloved is not one of them!). at the same time, this kind of response knows no boundaries. it would seem to go against the very nature of love to require moderation in response to one’s beloved. love is an overflowing excess through and through, and this is why it may seem to be an appropriate model for a humans relation to god. additionally, one notes, it is only this kind of excessive ethics, an ethics modeled on eros, that would seem to be appropriate to the agency required to complete an event of meaning a moderate ethics, closed both to the excesses and fragility of love, would not appear to be up to the task of response to utterly new breaks in meaning and being. these points, i believe, demonstrate why kearney is not a crypto-metaphysician, why his account of god as posse is not a simple “update” to scholastic conceptions of god. caputo was concerned that such a conception of god was not open to the horizon shattering possibility of the event, the riskiness of the “perhaps” of god. yet this point again presupposes his derridean commitments. kearney’s god as posse is possible in more than one sense, but i think most profoundly insofar as the meaning of this god as posse inexists in our contemporary (christian) religious traditions. kearney’s posse is a mediating construction, a notion purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 15 of a god that he hopes to assist in bringing to completion, to articulate by translating the narratives on god in both metaphysical and postmodern conditions, even theists and atheists. furthermore, the character of this god is one that is to be discerned ethically, following the model of erotic demand, following the way of the shulamite woman not following formal codes or moral rules. this is the god, probably, that he hopes for, and as a result this god remains only a possibility in just that sense. this is not the god für uns, as opposed to an sich. it is a god, perhaps if we can make sense of him/her/it, if we can make this kind of existence meaningful (though perhaps we will fail, and that is always a risk!). 5. how to life with/for a possible god at this point, i hope to have made it reasonably clear why none of the charges against kearney’s conception of god hit their mark. to argue, as the derrideans do, that kearney’s thought is (1) not radical enough, that (2) it is crypto-metaphysical, or that (3) it is closed to the most profound possibilities of ethics, is simply to misconstrue the character of kearney and ricoeur’s thought. both of these thinkers maintain that hermeneutics is a response to events of meaning/being, and that this response has a threepart structure: wagering, verifying, transforming. this three-part structure is what i have been calling the structure of infinite thought, and i have opposed it to the structure of radical finitude, which the derrideans defend. their sense of radical finitude turns on a conception of events that consist in the identification of an inexistent, and the recognition of the unpredictable to-come (a decision on the undecidable). while i have not provided any grounds for evaluating the relative strengths of these competing conceptions, the mere identification of two rival approaches is enough to demonstrate that the derrideans’ criticisms are unfounded. their arguments must presuppose the accuracy of just those points that are objects of dispute. a number of consequences follow for how one is to live in light of kearney’s conception of god as posse. the first of these connects with the broad concern of continental philosophy: just how does this account respond to the problem of nihilism? rather than assert that meaning enters the world through belief in some transcendent being (the traditional, scholastic approach), kearney’s approach accepts straightforwardly that the realm of sense described by natural science proscribes existential meaning. the sense of “god as posse” inexists in the order of being so understood, so that one gains access to its meaning only insofar as one sub-jects oneself to the god-event. in wagering on the sense of “posse” then, one twists-free from the tradition of the metaphysics of presence by finding a space for existential meaning through the events of being. in short, being is not all there is, for there “are” also events, understood as the unpredictable shifts, happenings of being. yet this approach to god does more than restore a form of existential meaning to the universe, which is also something that the derridean account contends that it is able to do. for the sense of god as posse also provides a means by which to live an ethics if not a rule-bound morality for one must also act in order to bring about the happening of the event. the exchanges between kearney and caputo have often centered on an analogy about opening doors. caputo argues that his account of events is radical insofar as it recognizes that in the case of god, one’s belief is like opening the door to one’s house without knowing who stands on the other side it might be a friend or a murderer. living before this mysterium tremendum et fascinans constitutes the life of the relipurcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 16 gious believer, who cannot foreclose the possibility that god might be a monster. this analogy aptly characterizes the derridean account of events, since it has two crucial parts: an inexistent, in this case represented by the door, and the incoming of an unforeseeable possibility, the person/beast standing on the other side. the kearneyan response is to suggest that the opening of the door is not something one does alone, that caputo’s metaphor presupposes a kind of individualism. events, he would respond, are only brought into being with others, so that when i open the door, i do so in relation to the other people in my household, those who have enabled me to live as i am. the opening itself, then, is a third part (the verification), without which the event does not happen. this basic difference concerning the character of events thus entails different ways of living. the event of god as posse, kearney suggests, is sustained by the practice of love, including even erotic love. at its most profound level, loving god as posse means that one must work actively to find better designations of god by translating incomparable narratives about god. this act of translation must be guided by an ethical commitment, since one only realizes an event with others and through one’s respons-ability to them. unethical conceptions of god, monstrous conceptions, then, are proscribed because they arise from a conception of human living, human intentional consciousness, that is abstract one that assumes that individuals exist prior to the communities in which they live. none of this suggests that the ethics of a commitment to god as posse follows rules, for the basic point that is underscored is the need to trans-late incommensurable conceptions of god, incommensurable conceptions of the highest goal for our lives, and this must follow the model of love, which operates excessively, without criteria. as a result, the need for hermeneutic trans-lation defines the basic ethical character of our lives. for kearney, we live in and through our hermeneutic endeavors, in and through our attempts to construct comparables between incomparable narratives, in and through the dissenting stories that people tell both in our own cultures and in those of others. i close these reflections with two brief indications for some further research that might follow from the foregoing. one of the more immediate consequences of the foregoing argument is that it suggests a new area for research in the philosophy of religion. it seems to me that the tactic of radical finitude has been explored rather thoroughly in contemporary thought, in the work of derrideans, such as caputo, in jean-luc marion’s conception of the doubly saturated phenomenon, or even those who have followed heidegger, such as jean-yves lacoste.12 this alternative path, taking up the position of infinite thought, perhaps deserves more consideration. kearney’s way is one way to do so, but perhaps there are others. a second consequence suggests that more work needs to be undertaken to evaluate the respective strengths of these positions. given the shared aim of twisting-free from the metaphysics of presence, which account of events is most capable of achieving this aim? this point seems to me to be a general metaphysical problem, and one that concerns one of the most profound points of contention in that area. if the “theological turn” took place just for the reason that it seemed poised to test such points of profundity, then perhaps it will continue to serve our thought well on this explicitly metaphysical point. the other area that seems to be flourishing in contemporary continental philosophy is this so-called “speculative turn,” a field in which badiou, deleuze, and žižek have established the existing contours. perpurcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 17 haps a point of contact between these two discourses, one metaphysical and one theological, would be salutatory for both. at least for any theological conception motivated by conceptions of possibility, this “perhaps” is one that should not be missed. references agamben, g. (1999a). the passion of facticity. potentialities: collected essays in philosophy (pp. 185-204). stanford, ca: stanford university press. agamben, g. (1999b). *s: hegel’s absolute and heidegger’s ereignis. potentialities: collected essays in philosophy (pp. 116137). stanford, ca: stanford university press. badiou, a. (2008). conditions. new york, ny: continuum press. badiou, a. (2009). logics of worlds: being and event 2. new york, ny: continuum press. bourgeois, p. (1993). the instant and the living present: ricoeur and derrida reading husserl. philosophy today, 37(1), 31-37. bourgeois, p. (1997). ethics at the limit of reason: ricoeur and deconstruction. philosophy today, 41(supplement), 142-151. burke, p. (2011). kearney’s other: the shadow. philosophy today, 55(supplement), 65-74. caputo, j. d. (2011). god, perhaps: the diacritical hermeneutics of god in the work of richard kearney. philosophy today. 55 (supplement), 56-64. caputo, j. d. (2010). the possibility of the impossible: a response to richard kearney. in n. deroo & m. zlomisc (eds.), cross and khora: deconstruction and christianity in the work of john d. caputo (pp. 140-150). eugene, or: pickwick. caputo, j. d. (1997). the prayers and tears of jacques derrida: religion without religion. bloomington & indianapolis, in: indiana university press. caputo, j. d (1987). radical hermeneutics: repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. bloomington & indianapolis, in: indiana university press. caputo, j. d. (2006). richard kearney’s enthusiasm. in j. manoussakis (ed.), after god: richard kearney and the religious turn in continental philosophy (pp. 309-319). new york, ny: fordham university press. caputo, j. d. (2006). the weakness of god: a theology of the event. bloomington & indianapolis, in: indiana university press. changeaux, j-p, & ricoeur, p. (2000). what makes us think? a neuroscientist and a philosopher argue about ethics, human nature, and the brain. princeton, nj: princeton university press. dawkins, r. (2008). the god delusion. boston, ma: mariner press. derrida, j. (1973). speech and phenomena and other essays on husserl’s theory of signs. evanston, il: northwestern university press. dooley, m. (2007). truth, ethics, and narrative imagination: kearney and the postmodern challenge. in p. gratton &j. manoussakis (eds.), traversing the imaginary: richard kearney and the postmodern challenge. evanston, il: northwestern university press. purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 18 gabriel, m., & žižek, s. (2009). mythology, madness and laughter: subjectivity in german idealism. new york, ny: continuum press. gedney, m. (2007). after ethics and affectivity: kearney’s hope in the god who may be. international journal of philosophic studies, 15(4), 599-616. hawking, s., & mlodinow, l. (2010). the grand design. new york, ny: bantam books. ihde, d. (1998). expanding hermeneutics: visualism in science. evanston, il: northwestern university press. ihde, d. (1993). postphenomenology: essays in the postmodern context. evanston, il: northwestern university press. kearney, r. m. (2010). anatheism: returning to god after god. new york, ny: columbia university press. kearney, r. m. (2011a). eros, diacritical hermeneutics, and the maybe. philosophy today, 55(supplement), 75-85. kearney, r. m. (2001). the god who may be: a hermeneutics of religion. bloomington & indianpolis, in: indiana university press. kearney, r. m. (2002). on stories. new york, ny: routledge press. kearney, r. m. (2003). strangers, gods, and monsters: interpreting otherness. new york, ny: routledge press. kearney, r .m. & taylor, j. (eds.). (2011). hosting the stranger: between religions. new york, ny : continuum press. kearney, r. m. (2011a). what is diacritical hermeneutics? journal of applied hermeneutics, 2(december), 1-14. lacoste, j-y. (2004). experience and the absolute: disputed questions on the humanity of man. new york, ny: fordham university press. lawlor, l. (1992). imagination and chance: the difference between the thought of ricoeur and derrida. albany, ny: suny press. lawlor, l. (2004). verendlichung (finitization): the overcoming of metaphysics with life. philosophy today, 48(4), 399-412. marder, m. (2011). the event of the thing: derrida’s post-deconstructive realism. toronto, on, canada: university of toronto press. masterson, p. (2008a). richard kearney’s hermeneutics of otherness. philosophy and social criticism, 34(3), 247-265. masterson, p. (2008b). the sense of creation. london, england: ashgate. marion, j-l. (2002a). being given: toward a phenomenology of givenness. stanford, ca: stanford university press. marion, j-l. (2002b). in excess: studies of saturated phenomena. new york, ny: fordham university press. marion, j-l. (2007). the erotic phenomenon. chicago, il: the university of chicago press. nietzsche, f. (1974). the gay science: with a prelude in rhymes and an appendix of songs. new york, ny: vintage books. purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 19 purcell, s. (2010). after hermeneutics? symposium: canadian journal of continental philosophy, 14(2), 160-179. purcell, s. (2011). on idealism and infinity: two paths to the ontological turn. radical philosophy review, 14(1), 49-66. purcell, s. (2012). two paths to infinite thought: alain badiou and jacques derrida on the question of the whole. cosmos and history: the journal of natural and social philosophy, 8(1), 179-203. ricoeur, p. (1967). the symbolism of evil. boston, ma: beacon press. ricoeur, p. (1972). nabert on act and sign. in d. ihde (ed.), the conflict of interpretations (pp. 211-222). evanston, il: northwestern university press. ricoeur, p. (1991). from text to action: essays in hermeneutics ii. evanston, il: northwestern university press. ricoeur, p. (2004). memory, history, forgetting. chicago, il: university of chicago press. ricoeur, p. (2005). the course of recognition. harvard, ma: university of harvard press. ricoeur, p. (2006). on translation. new york, ny: routledge press. stambaugh, j. (1992). the finitude of being. albany, ny: suny press. taylor, c. (1975). hegel. new york, ny: cambridge university press. notes 1 see for example (dawkins 2008), and (hawking & mlodinow 2010). 2 there is, of course, considerable disagreement concerning whether or not these specific thinkers ought to be included in this tradition, and if so, to what extent. i mention the matter here only because these thinkers have at various points been understood to partake of that tradition, and because they serve an illustrative purpose as a result. 3 for the specific places where these thinkers endorse a sense of radical finitude, see the following. for agamben see his (1999a) and (1999b). heidegger’s commitment to finitude is well-known. for what is one of the clearest essays on the character of his commitment see (lawlor, 2004), and for a book-length study, one might look to (stambaugh, 1992). for žižek’s straightforward commitment to finitude, see especially the “introduction” to the co-authored (gabriel & žižek, 2009). for the character of badiou’s infinite thought, likely the best essays are included in (badiou, 2008). for the way in which ricoeur and kearney are committed to infinite thought, clearly it is the point of the present essay to make this case. 4 patrick masterson, for example, has criticized kearney’s thought from a more traditional, metaphysical side in (masterson, 2008a; 2008b). this criticism deserves more consideration than it receives in the present essay, but it seems to me to be less serious than the derridean critique, since it does not entirely to share the aim of overcoming the metaphysics of presence. to my mind, then, while it is a form of criticism, it is not entirely an immanent one. purcell journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 5 20 5 lawlor makes a careful argument throughout the whole work, but the concluding chapter crystalizes what he takes to be the significant difference between the thinkers. 6 it should be noted that caputo is here assuming the traditional understanding of hegel, as one finds exposited in charles taylor’s account (taylor, 1975). on this understanding, hegel is the metaphysician par excellence, and so most culpable for contributing to the problem of nihilism. 7 at least they seem to me to be warranted under the ordinary construals of derrida on events, such as one finds in caputo (1987, 2010) or marder (2011). for a possible construal that might work given badiou’s recent criticisms, see purcell (2012). 8 see purcell (2010) and (2011). 9 in his exchange with changeaux, ricoeur seems to leave open the possibility that scientific occurrences just happen, though the sense of those occurrences is something that humans must process. see (changeaux & ricoeur, 2000, p. 4). 10 i am not the first to suggest that kearney’s position is committed to a fundamental ethical moment. for another, more detailed account of kearney’s commitment to ethics, see (gedney, 2007). 11 kearney has recently underscored this point in a recent essay, writing” “[i[n contrast to deconstructive sans-savoir, diacritical hermeneutics practices a certain savoir, which goes beyond derrida’s maxim of ‘reading in the dark’” (kearney, 2011a, p. 4). 12 for caputo’s derridean-inspired work on the philosophy of religion see: (caputo, 1997, 2006). for jean-yves lacoste’s heideggerian-esque work see (lacoste, 2004). marion outlines his account of saturated phenomena in (2002a) and updates it in (2002b) and (2007).   microsoft word amundson corrected proof.docx corresponding author: jon k. amundson, phd university of calgary email: amundsoj@shaw.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 18, 2019 ãthe author(s) 2019 the special obligation of the sufferer jon k. amundson abstract there are a number of inter-personal and intra-personal dynamics which affect/define the role of “sufferer” and that of the other encountering suffering. what follows is discussion regarding the role of each, and the paradoxical obligation of the beleaguered to assist in the management of their suffering through charity toward the other. keywords risk management, loss aversion, reflective and deliberate effort, resilience, post traumatic growth “the only thing we can be absolutely sure of is that sisyphus was happy.” ~ rollo may it is generally the case that when misfortune strikes, say in the form of disease, loss, or similar critical event, those proximate to the sufferer exclaim “if there is anything we can do, just let us/me know.” in such overture are two implications: the first one of conventional, though modest, empathy and the second, an implicit distancing from the object, event, or context of suffering. stated bluntly, the implicative conversation is that the person or institution has no interest in approximating nor appreciating the unique circumstance of the sufferer, to truly enculturate to their circumstance, nor engage in the reflexive, deliberate, cognitive exertion required; essentially saying, “you, the sufferer, do the heavy lifting in sorting through your confusion and dismay and assign me a task. hence any moral obligation to be a decent person will be satisfied withamundson journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 1 2 in myself and these may be an opportunity to actually do something.” yet, who in active grief or suffering can in fact roadmap the situation anyway? retreat to this cynical posture however is a bit too convenient. in what follows, the matter is further exploited through reference to the social psychology of risk management (amundson & short, 2018), the concept of the wounded healer (amundson & ross, 2016), the benefit/discipline of shared suffering (amundson, ross, & campbell, 2018), and finally the special obligation of the sufferer. risk management in approaching the suffering of the other “of all renunciation, the most difficult is to renounce the need to be well thought of.” ~ buddha risk management in social relationship is a dynamic enterprise, ultimately grounded in avoiding social pain. there is a robust literature on social pain and the means whereby humans, through risk management protect themselves (leary, tambor, terdal, & downs, 1995; murray, holmes, & collins, 2006). amundson and short (2018), though speaking of this phenomenon in the context of high conflict parenting, post-separation/divorce, nonetheless provide a framework for its explication. essentially, each person seeks a sense of presence, agency, and reciprocity in the world. this situation is profoundly subjective and expressed existentially as purpose, or meaning, or self-definition relative to others. however, as counterbalance is fear for social pain reflected in disapproval, rejection, censor, shame, critique, or “humiliation” (amundson & short, 2018, p. 3). between these two pales – the desire for roses and fear of the thorns – each person operates. this operation however is governed by internal and external dynamics. these consist of constitutional or biological predisposition, cognitive and socio-emotional competency, shaped by experiential learning through the lifespan and vulnerable periods in the organisms of life. all this, however, is also governed by sociocultural context which defines honor and shame, agency, and humiliation (appiah, 2010). hence in the subjective sense discussed above, an individual operates under their own sociometer (leary & baumeister, 2000; leary et al., 1995; macdonald & leary, 2005). some are more risk tolerant, some more risk avoidant; some more associative/affiliative; some more dissociative/restrained. this calibration related to social encounter, while historically located in the individual, is also contextual and immediate: essentially the question: “what here/now, with these people and this event, in my current most immediate state of mind, might/ought i do?” as practical organisms, human beings often resort to a particular heuristic or the tried and true. it is even argued that such response is outside of conscious control or the immediacy of the given. i watched a busy urban couple clearly on a mission of their own purpose/intent walk through the path of a disabled individual negotiating the sidewalk in a wheelchair, a sort of hypo-cognition blinding them to an experience perhaps outside of any regalities in their life. this phenomenon has been spoken of by appiah in his book experiments in ethics (2008); the classic good samaritan/theologian encounter where personal expediency overrides virtuous opportunity. again, risk management, and especially loss avoidance (kahneman, 2011) favors restraint, obliviousness, avoidance, or inhibition in the face of the anomalous. loss aversion, the possibility i will make a mistake, do something wrong or error underscore the “if there is anyamundson journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 1 3 thing i can do” response to suffering. better do nothing says this social psychological imperative than fuck it up; and it is without precedence that fuck up exists. in one of my first encounters with loss, a child of an acquaintance was killed in a tragic accident and the parents in hospital as result of the collision. they were to be released and return home in 10 – 14 days and two friends, closer to them than i, elected to visit their home and pack up the room of the deceased child under the auspices of sparing them any undue, renewed, or exacerbated grief. you can appreciate how this turned out. in another, a woman suffering from a neuromuscular degenerative disease, stumbled in the hallway of the hospital, and was set upon by the good intentions of those who began to offer assistance, beleaguering her with questions about consciousness and any reason she fell, asking for her to acquiesce to wheel chair assistance, and so on. when all the patient had wanted to do was demonstrate for as long as she could as much capacity as remained to manage herself. in this case, the simple dignity of getting herself up from the floor. hence then, loss avoidance, empirically supported and existentially anchored, seems to be the best policy for most. but what of those who do transcend hypo-cognition, risk aversion, and a neutral, non-engaged sociometric posture? what do we know, and can be said of this cohort? initially, they bring a modest sense of patience to the anomalous/challenging. this serves as foundation for cognitive exertion demonstrated through reflective and deliberate practice (amundson, 2017). while beyond the actual interest of this article these skills to think and think hard and think about one’s thoughts are associated with the goals of sympathy, empathy, and effective encounter with suffering. wounding and its benefits “there are two kinds of people; those who are scared and those who are scared and keep going.” ~ a. adler in a series of articles, amundson and ross (2017, 2018) spoke of the role of professional suffering in the life of the clinical psychologist. this exposure to moral injury (jinkerson, 2013) or in a more sterile clinical term vicarious traumatization (mccann & pearlman, 1990), is the necessary cost/inconvenience of exposure to human suffering. the challenge in the consulting room, and please begin to let this generalize to the central issue with this article, is that there are two potential responses. the first is browning out. unlike burn-out where both inside the skin and outside the skin symptoms become too much to bear or endure by oneself or others, browning out is a clinical state of mind where a professional goes to work in order to go home. there is role and well-established practice, and restriction in range or application of clinical skills, an automaticity of sorts. a second response however is found in a quote by carl jung: the doctor is only effective when he himself is affected. only the wounded physician heals… the analyst must go on learning endlessly…it is his own hurt that gives the measure of his power to heal. (stevens, 1994, p. 110) let us not be too dramatic in this sense however. by wound or effective, it is best to think of cognitive exertion: the reflective and deliberate effort to, as already stated, think and think about such thinking. this capacity is not a static skill acquired but a skill acquired and continually amundson journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 1 4 remade in the context of the person, their experiences, their growth, and maturity. in the career of milton erikson, a renowned psychotherapist, it was said he was continually remaking himself and his therapy. when queried about why/how he always seemed to be able to do something different, case to case, it is alleged his reply was “of course, it would be boring otherwise.” this capacity to sustain the effort (i.e., wound/effort) associated with reflective and deliberate effort, is worth considering relative to potential personal benefit. clinical practice/proximity to suffering as sadhana “when i stand before thee at the days end, thou shall see my scars and know that i had wounds and also my healing.” ~ rabindranath tagore amundson, ross, and campbell (2018) applied the hindu concept of sadhana to the disciplined exercise described above as reflective and deliberate cognitive exertion (r/dce). the word itself translates into “a means of accomplishing something.” in burrowing into this “something” and the word itself, it is stated: everything can be sadhana. the way you eat, the way you sit, the way you breathe, the way you conduct your body, mind, and your energies and emotions…sadhana does not mean any specific kind of activity, sadhana means using everything as a tool for your wellbeing. (https://isha.sadhguru.org/blog/yoga-meditation/demystifying-yoga/the-whatwhy-of-sadhana) managing the encounter clinically or in any other aspect of one’s life through not only our r/dce is associated with wellbeing; that things go better with thoughtful attention, patience, and diligence. this can be seen as a discipline; a practiced attitude or posture which, as above, opens us to wounding (i.e., conceptual discomfort) and the vicissitudes of any encounter with the other, but also skillful management of ourselves in the world, and self-development. what does this sense of attending to the suffering of another have to do with the special responsibility of the sufferer? while presented as blueprint for the design of interaction with someone in distress, it is also an emphasis upon the obligations of the sufferer to others, to those who might be involved in their distress. while empirical evidence for the failure of the “if there is anything i can do” posture is not necessary – google the term and the public forum provides multiple anecdotal/qualitative examples of its fail, empirical evidence does exist for its fail to the beleaguered in assisting in their distress management (nordal, 2011), and an opposite obligation emerges. the special responsibility of the sufferer “i know you are tired but come, this is the way.” ~ rumi it is difficult to say to someone suffering that you have a responsibility to assist others in feeling comfortable with your situation. initially this feels absolutely contrary to the conventional sense of others making you – the sufferer – feel comfortable. the paradoxical position spoken of here amundson journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 1 5 is situated between the metaphoric and the literal. yes, there is a literal pursuit of comfort promotion and it is situated in a metaphoric sense of what “comfort” is about. there is no given as to what will bring relief to the sufferer: there are no stages to grief/loss (moules, 1998; moules, simonson, prins, angus, & bell, 2004; neimeyer, 2001), only unique phenomenology experience. if one persists in presence (i.e., r/dce) belabored above, the sufferer will make it clear what comfort means. comfort here does not imply repose, nor ease, it instead implies letting people know where and how to stand, intentionally or implicitly. an elderly woman in the last stages of cancer made it clear that the role of any would be comforter was be patient with her enduring complaint regarding not only the unfairness of her status, but the failure of the world and others to be all as she expected. another patient, suffering decline associated with a terminal neuromotor condition, when asked by an acquaintance of her status, and upon declaring she had stopped working, was congratulated upon her retirement. polite, quiet response was the patient’s way of helping the thoughtless acquaintance to feel “comfortable:” the patient had loved her work and had used it as way to keep herself alive and vital. an elderly patient progressively losing sight, consistently and enduringly expressed gratitude for contact and conversation with family and friends. with each, a “comfort” sociometer is set, by intent or not; whether endurance with complaint, deferred conversation/discussion, or genuine repose in the presence of a person truly grateful. beyond this, however, is a more engaged role for the sufferer to actively create a context of comfort; to appreciate the capacities of each individual interacting with their grief/loss/suffering. such proposal is, however, not without controversy, and timing. when initially gripped by the inertia inherent in emergent grief or shock (moules & amundson 1997), a sufferer is most likely to take to ground. this refers to either literal quiet dissociation or activity and associative yet avoidant response. however, each sufferer – my illness, my loss of a loved one – will wrestle with the phenomenon of their circumstance, coming to their own “comfort” with their circumstance. there is the iconic story of the family of a 9/11 victim, who had slept in the morning of the attack and hence went into work and was there to his fate. normally he would have been in and out of the building before the time of its destruction. initially the family blamed themselves for not having awakened him, however with time they came to the position that this circumstance really gave them/him extra time on that day to spend with them on that day. it is this resolve which can empower the sufferer to empower others: to face the ability or inability of another to deal with you. as with the scenario above of the “can no longer work” celebratory miscue by an acquaintance, the sufferer deferred further conversation and allowed agreeable diffusion, appreciating that such was the lesser of several bad choices, for further engagement. in a similar sufferer as comforter scenario, a young man assigned to a wheel chair would, when observed by children, engage in wheelchair theater (i.e., rotations and movements), which entertained and released tension. this capacity to appreciate the burden of the other – amundson journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 1 6 what to do/say/make of the encounter – brings to the sufferer agency in their plight. it is as well an assignment of meaning and healing upon oneself. the irony of the admonition that “it is your job to help others relate to you” is that it requires ongoing obligation to relate to oneself. the degree to which we can set others at ease is the degree to which we can be at ease with ourselves. in the examples above, complaint and even avoidance, to some extent, reflect ill ease in the sufferer. nonetheless, gracefulness with maladroit or invasive pursuit by others also reflects our metaphor of comfort. it is achievement of coherence within the individual context of the sufferer/helper moment: what with this person, at this moment are the right reasons/potentials for one or another response? this striving by the sufferer is the striving within themselves to make of the situation the best it might be. is this not the lesson from the vast literature on coping? duan, guo, and gan (2015) and walsh, morrison, conway, rogers, sullivan, and groarke (2018) outlined the features associated with resilience and post-traumatic growth (ptg) relative to suffering; their relationship each to the other and their differences. resilience is the inherent ability of the person to manage trauma or related event. it differs in quality or even quantity, person to person. resilience is reflected in forbearance, endurance and self-maintenance in the face of adversity. individuals so loaded, predispositionally, manage the challenges of suffering better (zerach, solomon, cohen, & ein-dor (2013). for the sufferer, assisting others in relational management increases resilience, like increasing your strength in order to assist others in carrying their load. ptg however is of a different sort. it is re-evaluation and re-positioning of oneself within the context of one’s life through ever deepening reflective encounter with suffering. it is the apocryphal statement that something has “changed my life forever”; that “i will never be the same” and so on. the term apocryphal is used because in the face of the dire or imminent often such statements are uttered, only to fall short, once tragedy is averted. nonetheless, true ptg does occur and true ptg is accompanied by increased feelings of authority and genuineness relative to one’s inner experience and in the context of one’s life. i believe this might be the essence of accepting and benefiting from the special obligation of the sufferer, and the skill in assisting others in the management of their plight. and this perhaps takes us back to the beginning and the oft heard, “if there is anything i can do” which we might translate into “please embrace your special obligation and find solace in helping me, the other, with my suffering, and in so doing, you and i will benefit.” references amundson, j.k. (2017). ethics – the impossible imperative. reflexive or deliberate thinkers, why is reflective or deliberate practice so hard? psymposium, 27(1), 10-11. amundson, j.k., ross, m., & campbell, d. (2018). hey wait, i just thought of something else – advaita and clinical hypnosis. american journal of clinical hypnosis, 61(1), 18-33. amundson, j.k., & ross, m. (2016). the wounded healer from the other side of the couch. american journal of clinical hypnosis, 59, 1-9. amundson journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 1 7 amundson, j.k., & short, j. (2018). risk regulation in high conflict parenting. journal of divorce and remarriage. retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2018.1458205 appiah, k.w. (2010). the honor code: how moral revolutions happen. new york, ny: w.w. norton. appiah, k.w. (2008) experiments in ethics. cambridge, ma: harvard university press. duan, w., guo, p., & gan, p. (2015). relationships among trait resilience, virtues, posttraumatic stress disorder, and posttraumatic growth. plos one, 10(5). article id e0125707. jinkerson, j.d. (2016). defining and assessing moral injury: a syndrome perspective. traumatology, 22(2), 122–130. doi:10.1037/trm0000069. kahneman, d. (2011) thinking, fast and slow. toronto, on, canada: anchor canada. leary, m.r., & baumeister, r.f. (2000). the nature and function of self-esteem: sociometer theory. advances in experimental social psychology, 32, 1–62. doi:10.1016/s00652601(00)80003-9 leary, m.r., tambor, e.s., terdal, s.k., & downs, d.l. (1995). self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: the sociometer hypothesis. journal of personality and social psychology, 68(3), 5. macdonald, g., & leary, m.r. (2005). why does social exclusion hurt? the relationship between social and physical pain. psychological bulletin, 131, 202–223. doi:10.1037/00332909.131.2.202 mccann, i.l., & pearlman, l.a. (1990). vicarious traumatization: a framework for understanding the psychological effects of working with victims. journal of traumatic stress, 3(1), 131– 149. moules, n.j. (1998). legitimizing grief: challenging beliefs that constrain. journal of family nursing, 4(2), 142-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/107484079800400203 moules, n.j., & amundson, j.k. (1997). grief: an invitation to inertia. a narrative approach to working with grief. journal of family nursing, 3(4), 378 393. https:// doi. org/ 10.1177/ 107484079700300404 moules, n.j., simonson, k., prins, m., angus, p., & bell, j.m. (2004). making room for grief: walking backwards and living forward. nursing inquiry, 11(2), 99-107. murray, s.l., holmes, j.g., & collins, n.l. (2006). optimizing assurance: the risk regulation system in relationships. psychological bulletin, 132, 641–666. doi:10.1037/00332909.132.5.64118–530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518 niemeyer, r. (2001). meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss. washington dc: american psychological association. amundson journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 1 8 nordal, k. (2011) mind your body/grief: coping with the loss of a loved one. psychology, help center apa homepage apa.org stevens, a. (1994) jung. london, uk: oxford press. walsh, d.m.j., morrison, t.g., conway, r.j., rogers, e., sullivan, f.j., & groarke, a. (2018). a model to predict psychological and health-related adjustment in men with prostate cancer: the of post traumatic growth, physical post traumatic growth, resilience and mindfulness. frontiers in psychology, 9, article 136. zerach, g., solomon, z., cohen, a., & ein-dor, t. (2013). ptsd, resilience and posttraumatic growth among ex-prisoners of war and combat veterans. the israel journal of psychiatry and related sciences, 50, 91-98. microsoft word wong corrected proof.docx corresponding author: katherine wong, rn, master’s student email: katherine.wong1@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics issn: 1927-4416 october 9, 2019 ãthe author(s) 2019 raising children: philosophical hermeneutics and children with life-limiting illness katherine wong abstract children are authentically hermeneutic beings; they are not only open to the possibility that the other may be right, but often expect that the perspective of the other is correct. the hermeneutic tenets of history, tradition, and authority shape how children and childrearing are perceived in society. children are often regarded as in-progress, and this has implications for children diagnosed with life-limiting illness and the pediatric palliative healthcare providers that care for them. children who experience unique phenomena, such as dying in childhood, may possess an authority gained through superior insight that adults often overlook. art is a common language that can be used in hermeneutic research to better understand children’s experiences of lifelimiting illness. researchers who work with children must raise the value of children’s perspectives, find a shared language to foster understanding, and enter the circle with the same genuine hermeneutic spirit that children exemplify. keywords hermeneutics, children, authority, art, pediatric palliative care play, art, talking stuffed-animals, and story-telling are part of the language of children (aasgaard & edwards, 2012; bluebond-langner, decicco, & nordquest schwallie, 2012; sourkes, 2018; sourkes et al., 2005) and capture the essence of a child’s reality, expressed in a way that must be interpreted to be understood. philosophical hermeneutics is “the art of understanding and of making oneself understood” (zimmermann, 2015, p. 2), and is used as a underpinning in qualitative research that seeks to better understand the experience of another (moules, mccaffrey, field, wong journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 12 2 & laing, 2015). in this paper, i discuss how the hermeneutic tenets of history, tradition, and authority influence the position of children in society; childhood as a hermeneutic state of being; the address of children with life-limiting illness (lli); and how hermeneutic interpretations of the language of children with lli can offer new insight into their experiences. fusing art therapy techniques commonly used in pediatric palliative care (ppc) with hermeneutic interpretation, i will explore how adults might understand the language of art for children who are dying. thrown at birth humans are self-interpreting beings who navigate a complex world of meaning relations into which we are “thrown at birth” (zimmermann, 2015, p. 35): cast into the hermeneutic circle, immediately situated in our environment, and surrounded by family, friends, and teachers who contribute to our knowledge of that environment. understanding the world is a matter of interpreting through the piecing together of things such as words, symbols, and experiences into a meaningful whole (zimmermann, 2015). hermeneutic philosopher, hans-georg gadamer, connected the importance of history, tradition, authority, and language in shaping our understanding of the world (zimmermann, 2015). he posited that we cannot come to an understanding of anything from an objective, outside position; we cannot step outside of the context of our reality to view anything from a blank slate (moules et al., 2015; zimmermann, 2015). rather, history provides the foundation upon which understanding is made possible. our ability to interpret and understand the world is “always already” situated in a complex web of previously organized and interpreted conceptions – or traditions – within which we live and think (moules et al., 2015; zimmermann, 2015). authority is the recognition of superior insight, ability, and knowledge in the other (gadamer, 1996). in this positive sense of the word, authority is not meant as the exertion of power over another; it is the expectation that one’s authority will benefit the other. for example, the superior knowledge of a physician informs his or her ability to help a patient. tradition and authority are connected to our understanding of the world, insofar as understanding “always draws from the handed-down experience of tradition through recognized authorities” (zimmermann, 2015, p. 45). one may think for oneself, but one cannot think by oneself, as it is impossible to isolate one’s interpretations of reality from the authorities and traditions that construct it (zimmermann, 2015). a genuine experience is derived from an encounter that challenges our pre-understanding of the world as we have interpreted it, something new that refutes the expectations we have established from our initial construction of reality (moules et al., 2015; risser, 2019a; zimmermann, 2015). the new experience presents its own truth against our previous understanding (risser, 2019a). the repositioning of the familiar and unfamiliar – our becoming experienced – calls for an openness to the other and the alien, and a humble acknowledgement that what we understand may be revised by our encounters with something new (moules et al., 2015; risser, 2019a; zimmermann, 2015). early childhood and childrearing are a confluence of tradition, history, authority, and experience: a child’s main pursuit is to interpret a new and unfamiliar world by integrating their own experiences with the authority and handed-down traditions of the adults in their lives. wong journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 12 3 expanding the circle hermeneutics is new to me; my beginning interpretations of hermeneutics as a philosophy and research underpinning overlay the areas of my life where i consider myself to be more experienced. my career in ppc and pediatric nursing have a significant influence on how i interpret and understand my reality – i have been addressed by children with lli and the way that they go about being in the world. my pre-understandings of children as innocent and amusingly naïve have been revised over the course of my career; children have been my wisest teachers. the experience of witnessing children confront death led me to question the position of children, communicating with children, and the experiences of children who are dying. language, conversation, and questions a child’s first word is not the beginning of language; it is the start of a child’s ability to talk (risser, 2019b). the word is always preceded by the child’s interpretations of the world in which he or she occupies (risser, 2019b). reality presents itself to the child first, and language comes second to “re-present” the child’s reality with words (risser, 2019a, p. 4). along with the ability to talk comes the opportunity to converse and ask questions, and my experience as a pediatric nurse has led to the expectation that a considerable amount of my time spent with a young child will be full of questions. indeed, much of what young children encounter in their realities is experienced as something new or an added layer of complexity to a previous understanding. the posing of a question is the recognition of the limitations of one’s own knowledge on a subject, and the acknowledgement of the authority of the other, who is being questioned (gadamer, 1996; moules et al., 2015). questioning requires humility and curiosity in order to recognize one’s own ignorance and an openness to the unfamiliar. genuine conversation, the process of arriving at an understanding, requires each person to be open to the other, and accept the perspective of the other is truly valid (gadamer, 1960/2004). the hermeneutic circle becomes quite intelligible when equated with the rapidly expanding horizons of young children and their efforts to interpret and understand their world. when young children ask questions, they are not only open to the possibility that the perspective of the other may be right, they expect that the other possesses superior insight. children do not go about questioning with a conscious effort to be humble about their limitations, they are genuinely open to the other. the endlessly/perpetually curious and repetitive nature of a child’s line of questioning is authentically hermeneutic, as it is a continual effort to reconcile his or her interpretations of reality along with the knowledge of their authorities. the process by which an adult interprets and understands his or her reality may have a level of sophistication that a child does not yet possess, but this should not imply that the child’s reality is any less valid than that of the adult’s. historically, children’s genuine hermeneutic nature has been misinterpreted for inferiority or lack of insight, and these traditions may have significant implications for parents and healthcare providers of children with lli. wong journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 12 4 childrearing and childhood parents often serve as the main authority in a child’s world. the concepts of tradition, history, and authority have a significant influence on childrearing practices in modern society. to rear is to “bring into being” or “to bring up” (rear, n.d.). to “raise” a child suggests that the parent is an authority, for their power and superior insight, and that the child’s lower position can be elevated over time. there are social roles imbedded into the meaning of childrearing, placing the parent in the role of the nurturing superior, and the child as the subordinate. the history and tradition of childrearing has influenced the societal perception of children as deficient adults. historically, adults have not acknowledged children’s views to be of equal value, and often children are thought of as “in progress,” best seen and not heard (larcher & carnevale, 2012). childhood is often regarded as the process of “becoming,” and the precursor to, or absence of, mature rational capacity (bluebond-langner, 1978; hatab, 2014). the traditional perception of childhood becomes problematic when a child is diagnosed with lli. children who are dying will not be raised, will not “become,” and are thrown into experiences that force them to prematurely conceptualize things that would typically lie beyond their grasp developmentally (bluebondlangner, 1978; sourkes, 1995). the experience of lli in childhood challenges society’s expectations of childrearing and of being raised, as what it means to be a child and what it means to be dying are conflicting concepts in western culture (wong, 2019b). thrown out of the circle the beginning and end of life occurring simultaneously throws an assumed sequence of life out of order (wong, 2019a): parents are not meant to outlive their child, palliative care programs for children should not need to exist, and, as morgan (2009) stated, “children, the hope and future for our society, are not supposed to die” (p. 87). everything that history and tradition has taught about childrearing is thrown out of the realm of understanding with such a drastic disruption of the traditional succession of family life. the perceived innocence and vulnerability of children influences how involved they are allowed to be in their care and decision-making at end of life, and how much information is shared with them (larcher & carnevale, 2012; rahimzadeh et al., 2015; stein et al., 2019). my work with children with lli was often complicated by parental wishes to keep their child ignorant of the fact that he or she was dying. historically, parents and healthcare providers have been unwilling to disclose information regarding a terminal prognosis to children, with the hope that their ignorance would protect them from the distress and anxiety that arise when one realizes their death is imminent (larcher & carnevale, 2012; stein et al., 2019). while there has been a substantial change in practice over the past 70 years regarding information-sharing with children about their illness and prognosis (stein et al., 2019), i frequently encounter families who adhere to the once-prevailing belief that children are better left unaware. however, it has been my experience that no matter how much information is withheld from children with lli, many children have some level of uncertainty about whether they will continue to live, and may be explicitly conscious that they will die from their illness. wong journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 12 5 children with lli seek to make sense of their experiences by interpreting the world around them, with whatever information and resources are available to them (aasgaard & edwards, 2012). drastic changes in physical appearance, the ability to play and participate in care, and increasing pain and fatigue are examples of what sourkes (1995) described as the “wisdom of the body” (p. 107), and provide the child with an impression of how sick he or she is. children may also be made conscious of their poor prognosis by interpreting the facial expressions and body language of their carers or by noticing an increase in the intensity of their treatment (bluebond-langner, 1978; sourkes, 1995; stein et al., 2019). children may note the reluctance of parents and healthcare providers to acknowledge these changes, and interpret the silence on the matter to mean that it is not to be discussed, preventing further understanding that could be achieved through conversation (bluebond-langner, 1978; sourkes, 1995; stein et al., 2019). bluebondlangner (1978) argued that children who are dying may maintain the pretense that they are ignorant of their situation because they understand and wish to uphold their social position as children, as the lesser being. however, childhood is more than a biological phenomenon or antecedent to adulthood: it is a social construction that is influenced by prevailing cultural, historical, and societal beliefs (rahimzadeh et al., 2015). the prejudice of children’s realities as inferior and incomplete violates the hermeneutic principle that the perspective of the other is valuable, valid, and an opportunity for new understanding. in order to better understand the experiences of children with lli, the value of children’s worlds must be raised, and adults must enter the conversation with humility and the same genuinely hermeneutic approach that children embrace to understand their reality. re-entering the circle qualitative ppc literature is largely informed by studies that overwhelmingly represent the narratives of the parents of children with lli and their healthcare providers, not from the firsthand account of children with lli (liben, langner, & bluebond-langner, 2014; rahimzadeh et al., 2015). without adequate inquiry into the experiences of children with lli, ppc providers have a limited ability to understand how current policies, literature, and practices affect pediatric patients in ppc (rahimzadeh et al., 2015). future research in ppc must respect that children have a central role in constructing and interpreting their worlds (montreuil & carnevale, 2016) and recognize, as rahimzadeh et al. (2015) stated, “there is yet so much to learn from children of the death and dying process in order to better care for future children during the death and dying process” (p. 4). if researchers were to recognize children with lli as authorities on dying in childhood, and re-enter the hermeneutic circle as adults with the same genuine openness that we once possessed as children, what new insights might we discover? what common language might we find to help us merge our horizons? the position of the participant in hermeneutic research reflects the need to revise the prejudice of children as “becoming.” we do not come into being during our childhood, we are thrown into being at birth, into a world that “always already” has meaning for us to interpret (zimmermann, 2015). a child who experiences lli and the threat of death possesses superior insight of what it is like to be a child who is dying, insight that an adult is unlikely to have, simply because he or she has survived to adulthood. children conceptualize death differently than adults (bluebondlangner, 1978; bluebond-langner et al., 2012; sourkes, 1995), and their pre-understanding of the meaning of death may have a significant influence on how they experience lli and dying. wong journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 12 6 to better understand the experiences and language of children who are dying, i must recognize a child with lli as an authority on the topic, and be open to the possibility that he or she may know or understand something that i do not. understanding through art ppc healthcare providers often use art therapy to allow children to convey their experiences of living with lli, to assess coping styles and developmental maturity, and to capture the essence of their realities in the form of creative expression (aasgaard & edwards, 2012; sourkes, 1995). creative therapeutic approaches are recognised by children to be safe, familiar, and often enjoyable activities, which can be particularly important to children in clinical environments and when experiencing unfamiliar and distressing situations (aasgaard & edwards, 2012; sourkes, 1995). art therapy also allows children who may not have the vocabulary or ability to articulate their experiences with words to express themselves in a different form of language (aasgaard & edwards, 2012; sourkes, 1995). utilizing art therapy in a hermeneutic interview may assuage some of the concerns regarding participant vulnerability and the challenge of communication. how might we understand the language of art for children who are dying? the question necessitates a hermeneutic lens for research, as it asks what artistic expression might reveal about the nature of a child’s being in the world. art and its ability to depict the more enigmatic truths of human life is an important characteristic of philosophical hermeneutics, as it encapsulates both the event of understanding – experiencing art – and of making oneself understood – creating art (zimmermann, 2015). as a research methodology, hermeneutics provides an interpretive lens that allows the language of art to be weaved into the whole of the participant’s story. conclusion understanding through interpretation is at the heart of philosophical hermeneutics (zimmerman, 2015). future research in ppc must recognize that children with lli are an authority on the experiences of ppc patients, and that the worldviews of children are as valuable to ppc literature as the perspectives of parents and healthcare providers. in this paper, i have discussed how history, tradition, authority, and experience may influence children’s realities and how they are positioned in their social roles. i have argued for the recognition of the superior insight of children with lli, and the need for adults to re-enter the hermeneutic circle as authentically as children do. i concluded with a discussion on how art may be used as a common language in research in ppc so that the experiences of children with lli can be better understood. references aasgaard, t., & edwards, m. (2012). children expressing themselves. in a. goldman, r. hain, & s. liben (eds.), the oxford textbook of palliative care for children (2 ed.; pp. 101-116). oxford, uk: oxford university press. bluebond-langner, m. (1978). the private worlds of dying children. princeton, uk; princeton university press. wong journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 12 7 bluebond-langner, m., decicco, a., & nordquest schwallie, m. (2012). children's views of death. in a. goldman, r. hain, & s. liben (eds.), the oxford textbook of palliative care for children (2 ed.; pp. 68-78). oxford, uk: oxford university press. gadamer, hg. (1960/2004). truth and method (j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshal, trans.). london, uk: continuum. gadamer, h.-g. (1996). the enigma of health. stanford, ca: stanford university press. hatab, l. j. (2014). dasein, the early years: heideggerian reflections on childhood. international philosophical quarterly, 54(4), 379-391. doi: 10.5840/ipq201410619 holloway, i., & galvin, k. (2017). qualitative research in nursing and healthcare (4 ed.). ames, ia: wiley blackwell publishing. larcher, v., & carnevale, f. a. (2012). ethics. in a. goldman, r. hain, & s. liben (eds.), the oxford textbook of palliative care for children (2 ed., pp. 35-49). oxford, uk: oxford university press. liben, s., langner, r., & bluebond-langner, m. (2014). pediatric palliative care in 2014: much accomplished, much yet to be done. journal of palliative care, 30(4), 311-316. doi: 10.1177/082585971403000414 montreuil, m., & carnevale, f. a. (2016). a concept analysis of children’s agency within the health literature. journal of child health care, 20(4), 503-511. doi:10.1177/1367493515620914 morgan, d. (2009). caring for dying children: assessing the needs of the pediatric palliative care nurse. pediatric nursing, 35(2), 86-92. retrieved from http://www.pediatricnursing.net/ce/2011/article35086090.pdf moules, n. j., mccaffrey, g., field, j. c., & laing, c. m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. rear. (n.d.). online etymology dictionary. retrieved from: https://www.etymonline.com/word/rear#etymonline_v_7344 rahimzadeh, v., bartlett, g., longo, c., crimi, l., macdonald, m. e., jabado, n., & ells, c. (2015). promoting an ethic of engagement in pediatric palliative care research. bmc palliative care, 14(50), doi:10.1186/s12904-015-0048-5 risser, j. (2019a). when words fail: on the power of language in human experience. journal of applied hermeneutics. article 6. retrieved from https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/index wong journal of applied hermeneutics 2019 article 12 8 risser, j. (2019b). speaking from silence: on the intimate relation between silence and speaking. journal of applied hermeneutics. article 7. retrieved from https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/index sourkes, b. m. (1995). armfuls of time: the psychological experience of a child with lifelimiting illness. london, uk: routledge. sourkes, b. m. (2018). children's experience of symptoms: narratives through words and images. children (basel), 5(4). doi:10.3390/children5040053 sourkes, b. m., frankel, l., brown, m., contro, n., benitz, w., case, c., . . . sunde, c. (2005). food, toys, and love: pediatric palliative care. current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care, 35(9), 350-386. doi:10.1016/j.cppeds.2005.09.002 stein, a., dalton, l., rapa, e., bluebond-langner, m., hanington, l., stein, k. f., . . . bland, r. (2019). communication with children and adolescents about the diagnosis of their own lifethreatening condition. lancet, 393(10176), 1150-1163. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33201-x wong, k. (2019a). holding both: a conceptual analysis of duality in pediatric palliative care. unpublished manuscript, faculty of nursing, university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. wong, k. (2019b). unspeakable, unspoken, and unheard: hermeneutics and pediatric palliative care. unpublished manuscript, faculty of nursing, university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. zimmermann, j. (2015). hermeneutics: a very short introduction. oxford, uk: oxford university press. microsoft word williamson field corrected proof 2.docx 1 university of calgary corresponding author: w. john williamson email: wjohn.williamson@cssd.ab.ca journal of applied hermeneutics february 27, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery w. john williamson1 & jim field1 abstract this interpretive essay attempts to demonstrate the potential good that might come from approaching a hermeneutic phenomenological study as a hard-boiled detective story in the tradition of raymond chandler. the authors attempt to explain the hermeneutic warrants for such an adventure—that is, for how and why a topic like the categorization and treatment of students in the public education system as “slow learners” might be approached as a detective story. the parallels between detective fiction, chandler’s work as a noir novelist, and hermeneutics are drawn out. attention is drawn to the ground of our interpretive relationship with the world in heidegger’s notion of the “as structure” of interpretation. a case is made for seeing the hardboiled detective story as a hermeneutic venue for shaking up commonsense understandings of how we have come to see and do education with those students designated as slow in their learning. keywords fiction, hermeneutics, mystery stylistically, one of the many interesting and “novel” things about applied hermeneutic research is how it can challenge the boundaries of what might be loosely called “formal academic writing.” hermeneutic work, because it is committed to the notion of truth as “the radiance of the beautiful” (gadamer, 2004, p. 479), and the appreciation of the poetic nature of truth (heidegger, 1962), often spills over into the more aesthetic side of writing. hermeneutic research is highly personal (moules, 2002), in the sense that with each hermeneutic encounter researchers become more williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 2 attuned to the possibilities inherent in their future encounters. researchers become, to paraphrase gadamer (2004), better able to have experiences and learn from them. the transformation and reorganization of experience is at the heart of hermeneutic work, and one of the senses of application that gadamer (2004) described. in this way, the personal in hermeneutics boldly and baldly asserts the value of the authors’ experiences, not as hermetic traps sealing the researchers up inside the “circuits of historical life” as gadamer (2004, p. 278) has so elegantly stated, but as a way to cultivate the very opposite: the competency to have an encounter with the truth of a living topic located in that vast and fluid landscape known as the human condition. just as the art of the visual or the literary addresses its themes obliquely in their complexity, hermeneutic research rarely offers straightforward solutions to the issues it discusses, at times openly opposing the very idea of straightforward solutions to complex human dilemmas. its application comes to fruition when it is able to “restore life to its original difficulty” (caputo, 1987, p.1), that is, when it helps us see life as such difficult, tragic, but not impossible as caputo (1987) has said, but instead full of possibility. this is often accomplished through writing that is lyrical, metaphoric, playful and, above all, evocative. as jardine (2012) both claimed and continues to demonstrate: hermeneutic work treats its topics like works of art that gather up our festive returns, topics that, in return for our attention and devotion, begin to glow in response to the attention we have bestowed upon them. (p. 3) the quote may seem to make hermeneutics an approach steeped in romanticism. it certainly has been criticized on these grounds. habermas (in bernstein, 2002, p. 273) has accused gadamer of “engaging in a sentimental nostalgia for past traditions and epochs" in, and derrida (in bernstein, 2002, p. 273) has claimed gadamer was naive in his belief that dialogue can yield unity, coherence, and structure, and as such “gloss over the hetereogeneities and abysses that confront us”. it would be un-hermeneutic to deny these risks, however, we continue to assert the opportunity for the unflinching and compassionate honesty that hermeneutic work offers. it can be about the sharpest pain we can experience as humans: the loss of something or someone that makes getting on with one’s life, for the moment anyways, unimaginable (moules, 2009). for all its reliance on metaphor and joy, hermeneutics begins with the assumption that peoples’ suffering is real (davey, 2006). so we offer another bold claim that comes perhaps too early to be believed: when it works, hermeneutics is, in all its instances, applied, and its application occurs at a precise moment. according to risser (1997), “application is not a simple matter of following a procedure as one follows a recipe, but a matter of perceiving what is at stake in a situation” (p.107). it is here that life returns in all its difficulty because seeing what is at stake is not a given; blindness is the more likely outcome, especially without the help of the other. the topic of this paper, borne out of 15 years of one of the authors working as a teacher with struggling students and students with diagnosed disabilities, could broadly be construed as an investigation into the phenomenon of slow learners, viewed as mysteries to be lived with rather than problems to be solved, as they are so often construed in educational discourse. this, however, says too much and too little, as formal explanations are want to do with mysteries, because there are missing people involved here that we are determined to “find” so to speak. let us try to recover them briefly and at the same time to speak to their disappearance. williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 3 the language of seeing learners as slow “slow learner” is an educational label that describes a psycho-educational category of students testing in the low-average range of intellectual functioning (king, 2006). predicted to struggle in school due to having intellectual functioning one category below the average range, slow learners are nevertheless categorically excluded from special education supports and services. while learners categorized as special needs when engaged in regular curriculum are eligible for enhanced tracking, supportive programming and academic accommodation (alberta education, 2004), the only programming alternative for slow learners, who are unable to keep up with regular curriculum, that is offered is a set of vocational electives called knowledge and employability (k & e) classes. these classes culminate in a different credential than the higher status and better-known alberta high school diploma (alberta education, 2008). such disparity might simply be addressed as an apparent gap in educational services, but what is also at stake here is the taken for granted-ness of educational categories such as “slow learner” and “learning disabled.” in education, they exist as empirical givens. what is forgotten here is that categories like this are socially constructed, and exist as historically-affected institutional practices (danforth, 2006). even if these categories also signify measurable learning deficits, as educators we tend to forget that there is no pedagogy attached to them. who these people are has not been revealed through a label, and the mystery of what to do for them has not been solved. a disability studies perspective serves to remind us that, while an individual may have a distinct physical or intellectual impairment, disability itself is, partially at least, a function of the barriers that are created by institutional responses or lack thereof to the individual’s particular impairment (dunn, 2010). life itself does not come with a label; it presents challenges to us all that sometimes we can overcome, but that often “disable” even the most capable of us. therefore we ask: who among us can ever claim that they are always able, never “slow” or “impaired” in life? moreover, the use of these kinds of labels in education, because of their implied permanence, that is, because they assume that someone is always and everywhere disabled, or slow if labeled as such, has been critiqued because it can create negative stereotypes, which result in many cases to self-fulfilling prophesies (danforth, 2006). the situation is both more complicated and simple than this—these students, left on their own in a system infamous for its inflexibility and lack of accommodation for individual differences of all types, are likely to struggle and fail in regular classes (couture, 2012). this means that the kind of educational support they need requires funding, and garnering funds requires that these students be categorized and labeled (gilham & williamson, 2013). here is the dilemma: if we label these students, making them “appear” as it were, we may be doing them harm, and if we do not, and we allow them to simply “disappear,” we may be doing them harm. we are confronted with the possibility of propagating evil, both as “suffering” and “wrong-doing” (kearney, 2003, p. 84), on either path. it appears to be “a devil’s bargain from the start” (robbins, 2007, p. 6), one that escapes our ability to make sense of it because it is the thing (no thing) we cannot get around, both in the sense of something we cannot avoid running into somewhere along the way and in the sense of something we cannot surround, circumscribe, or encompass with our concepts. it is what is left over, the radical hermeneutic residuum which conceptual thinking and planning can never exhaust, include, and assimilate. it is the moment of withdrawal (ent-zug), which inhabits everywilliamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 4 thing that is “given,” the absence (abwesen, ab-esse) in everything which we try to summon into presence (anwesen, prae-esse) (caputo, 1987, p. 270). yet, in a taken for granted kind of way, it does make sense, in that we regularly proceed in schools as if everything was right and just, as if the absence /presence, thing/nothing of slow learners did not call for careful investigation in each and every case. it appears to be, as caputo (1987) claimed, a mystery, one that claims us, one that requires that we be open to both its presence and absence, or more essentially to “the unsettling fluctuation between the two” (p. 270). all well and good, we might say, at the level of ought and should, but how are we supposed to accomplish this-how are we to understand this mystery, or at the least, where might we turn for help in making our way through? heidegger (1962) and gadamer’s (2004) response to this question was to turn to metaphor, or more accurately perhaps, to acknowledge that our language and thus our relationship to the world and to understanding is deeply metaphorical. all understanding, heidegger (1962) boldly asserted in being and time, “has the structure of something-as-something,” that is, it is meaningful already. weinsheimer (1985) put it beautifully: we do not hear pure sounds, but a car in the street, a baby crying; we do not see pure colors or shapes, but always a face, a knife, a wreath of smoke. … perception understands, and understanding involves the construal of something as something. (p. 94) if understanding is metaphorical, it is also playful, as gadamer (2004) reminded us, but not playful as the uncommitted toying of an individual subject with an object (vilhauer, 2011). in line with gadamer’s thinking, we are not proposing here simply to play with the topic, like a cat does with a mouse, but also to be played by it like someone caught up in an event, in what vilhauer (2011) called “a dance of mutual responsiveness” (p. 33). this dance is as schwandt (2007) reminded us is a dialectic of transcendence and appropriation. on the one hand, as one gives oneself to the play, one becomes fascinated with the world and loses oneself in the game or play. the play takes over, determining possibilities and moving the player into the unknown. on the other hand, play affects a kind of self-discovery; it reveals possibilities to the player and thus is a kind of self-transformation. being at play or the event of play is like being in a genuine conversation or dialogue with a text or another person. play is thus an analogy for the event of understanding. (p. 228) we hope that through this play, the meaning of the topic (die sache), or better perhaps, the topic in play, might emerge more fully. it is this hermeneutic offering, of the possibility of understanding something differently, that we wish to take up in addressing the topic of slow learners through the medium of a fictionalized, stylized narrative in the tradition of hard-boiled detective fiction. it is provisionally titled “the case of the appearing/disappearing slow learners: an interpretive mystery.” williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 5 though seeing the phenomenon of slow learners as a stylized mystery may seem risky or excessively speculative (and yet caputo [1987] made the case that avoiding speculation is nothing short of being cowardly and irresponsible), we offer this as an alternative to the way special education/diverse learner discourse sees slow learners, a way that many have accused of being extremely limited, hubristic, and pernicious in that there is a tacit acceptance of the way things are (couture, 2012; danforth, 2006; dunn, 2010, graham & slee, 2008). specifically from a disability studies perspective, these approaches seem to operate on the principle of metonymy, or the substitution of one characteristic, perhaps a student’s discreet impairment or some proposed intervention, for the complex whole of their being. the substitution conceals the problematic nature of the operation. through our alternate “seeing as,” we hope to explore this phenomenon metaphorically in an attempt to cast a different light, to broaden and deepen the educational conversation about slow learners. similarly, we offer the extended metaphor of the hard-boiled detective story as one unsettling way of interpreting the phenomenon of slow learners and broader process of educational classification in alberta’s schools. we hope to find our own forms of renewal in this meaning-making, to inspire and be enriched by other speculative interpretations, and to occasion renewing conversations about how, as educators, we can live more justly with students who appear to us as different in their learning, who appear as others, outside but inside educational discourse. our claim to the need for an alternate “seeing as” regarding this topic may seem more obvious than our claim to the hermeneutic potential of this particular genre. why hard-boiled detective writing? despite the worn cliché of the trench-coated, wise cracking private eye, hard-boiled writing, when it is done right, is powerfully unsettling. it asks uncomfortable questions. it goes to dark places. it has little regard for privilege or authority, particularly when these forms of power are wielded oppressively. hard-boiled detective writing is an ideal tool to agitate and then, ungently, break away the time-thickened sediment of institutional discourse and practice and reveal the often troubling assumptions beneath. we will explain how this genre came to acquire its vigilant character, and elaborate on its value as a form of applied hermeneutics, but first we offer this demonstration of hard-boiled writing applied to our topic of educational classification. samples of the work in progress what follows below are two anecdotes from the lead author’s experiences as a teacher working with slow learners, both told as parts of a hard-boiled detective story. john williamson is a fictionalized version of the author. max hunter is a fictional private detective hired to investigate the symbolic and actual disappearance of slow learners in alberta’s schools. max is characterized as a jaded, detective, someone who does not live easily in the world, a “misfit” in modernity’s program so to speak, much like slow learners in the education system. like them, max appears and disappears at inexplicable times. he does not comport himself in the same way that these students do however, because he does not suffer fools gladly, he cannot abide “departmental regulations,” nor flaccid explanations of “that’s just the way things are done.” he becomes insufferable, in fact dysfunctional, in the face of them. max is not there “to serve and protect” but rather, like dorothy’s dog, in the wizard of oz, there to pull back the curtain (or more in character, perhaps, to tear it to pieces) to reveal the caprice and fakery of the apparatus that propagates the myths and injustices of society. max loves the horror of the effect, revels in pulling people up short with the “awful truth.” max’s investigations lead, as caputo (2007) wrote, williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 6 “not to comfort but to thunderstorms” (p. 214), and he is present as an unwelcome reminder that it is not just nice guys that tell the truth. max does not always believe that the “other might be right,” as does gadamer, nor is he always gadamer’s ideal conversational partner, the friendly interlocutor engaged in the art of strengthening. we cannot listen to max because we like him; he is easily dismissed on that account, as was heidegger for his association with the national socialist party or his infamous das speigel interview. rather we have to listen to max, in spite of his sordid lifestyle, even when he does not respect us, even when he would rather kick our favorite dog than pet him, because he is capable of dragging us, kicking and screaming, to the truth. in this way, he is an important (radical) foil to williamson, bonhomie gadamerian through and through. in both anecdotes, max hunter is the narrator. the first sample demonstrates max’s hard-boiled incredulity in discovering, from primary sources, educational psychology’s categorical depictions of slow learners and learning of the apparent lack of effectiveness in current forms of programming for them in alberta. the next section demonstrates the hermeneutic potential of the fictional detective as means of interrogating williamson’s real unease with the negative assumptions that often haunt slow learners in the educational institutions. the first excerpt from the story begins on a winter’s day in calgary, alberta… ***************************************************************************** the library sitting in the buick, windshield wipers fending off a slow but insistent snowfall, i realized i had no idea where to start. i had to do something though. a paying case is always good but i didn’t want to be stuck in this cold city any longer than i had to and this unnaturally early meeting with williamson had left me with a lot of day to work with. more often than not i like to work by stirring things up instead of piecing things together1, waiting to see what comes to the surface, but i didn’t even really know where to stir. williamson had lent me his public library and university library cards and i had a roughly similar general appearance, aside from being fitter and better dressed, i thought maybe a warm library might be a good place to check up on some of the facts of williamson’s story. i still didn’t entirely trust this strange, earnest client. he seemed, at times a moralizing boy scout, at other times a delusional fool. what kind of man hires a detective to look for an educational category? i drove to the downtown public library, and then away from the library when i saw all the nearby lots were full. i parked at an expensive pay lot making sure i got a receipt so i could pass the pain on to my client and walked several chilly blocks. reaching my destination i passed through a metal detector overseen by an ancient sentry. i’d guessed there might be such security and begrudgingly left candace2 locked and lonely in the trunk of the buick. 1 references and commentary will be made through footnotes in the novel so as not to interrupt the narrative. this note acknowledges that hamilton (1987) makes this point about hard – boiled detectives. 2 max hunter’s affectionate nick-name for his revolver. idea was from spillane (1947).   williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 7 i walked past the checkout desk and some shelves of books and sat myself down in a little patch of heaven, a cubicle with chipped particle board, a hard plastic chair, graffiti and a desktop computer with greasy keys and a smudged screen. i logged myself in as williamson and began to look up subjects. i thought maybe i’d verify what williamson had begun to tell me about slow learners in our first meeting. it was weird; as soon as i’d entered the phrase “slow learner” a couple of times into library catalogue, the computer i was using seemed to slow down for a minute too. despite this i managed to locate a recent book on the topic in their holdings. it was called slow learners: their psychology and instruction3, and a copy was available at this branch. i left my trench coat on the chair to mark my place and walked up the stairs, retrieved the book from one of the shelves and returned to my station. i noticed that while i was upstairs i had acquired a neighbor in cubicle beside me. he didn’t seem particularly sociable or even conscious. a head of matted hair rested, facing away from me, on a huge fleshy forearm. a formless grey overcoat concealed the rest of my companion’s appearance but i could detect the sickly sweet smell of rot. classy joint. the cover of the book i selected depicted child of twelve or thirteen sitting backwards on a chair, maybe to emphasize his perceived backwardness as a slow learner. he was staring out at me with a look that was both forlorn and somewhat vacant. reading the introduction i noticed that the authors authoritatively stated the i.q. levels williamson had only mentioned approximately. i also observed that they seemed to think he had pretty much everything else figured out about slow learners too. the experience of educators confirms that there are many children who are so backward in basic subjects that they need special help. these pupils have limited scope for achievement. they have intelligence quotients between 76 and 89 and they constitute about 18 percent of the total school population. these students do not stand out as very different from their classmates except that they are always a little slow on the uptake and are often teased by the other students because of their slowness. they are quite well built physically but rather clumsy and uncoordinated in movement. they are no trouble in school. although much of the work is difficult for them, they are patient and cooperative…they need help in the form of special class [sic] in ordinary school. most slow learners struggle along in ordinary classes failing to have the special attention which they need.4 “wow,” i thought, “could it be true that almost a fifth of the students in any given school are just like this?” that smelled funny so i checked out another source on the computer, this time an article written by an american psychologist, answering a series of “faqs” or “frequently asked questions” about slow learners on the website “schoolpsychogistfiles.com”.5 3 reddy, ramar, & kusama (2006). 4 reddy, ramar, & kusama (2006). 5 king (2006).   williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 8 a “slow learner” is not a diagnostic category, it is a term people use to describe a student who has the ability to learn necessary academic skills, but at rate and depth below average same age peers. in order to grasp new concepts, a slow learner needs more time, more repetition, and often more resources from teachers to be successful. reasoning skills are typically delayed, which makes new concepts difficult to learn. at this point the website quoted the same iq numbers that williamson and the previous book mentioned. but then the writer made and interesting clarification. those who fall two standard deviations below the mean are often identified as having an intellectual disability (iq below 70). a slow learner does not meet criteria for an intellectual disability (also called mental retardation) [sic]. however, she learns slower than average students and will need additional help to succeed. all this sorting into cozy little boxes was making me miss my tiny warm hotel room, not to mention the greasy buffet table at the hotel restaurant. i was tired and hungry. i noticed my companion in the next cubicle had disappeared; i chided myself for missing this when it happened. still he’d seemed harmless. i gave myself a couple of quick slaps to the face and concentrated on my research again. i was looking for a different perspective on this classification process and found a study in an on-line journal that offered just that.6 this article was pretty technical. still i was able to piece together that these authors didn’t like how psychologists and educators, in the authors’ opinions, often overused the idea of “low average” in describing the traits and needs of students. “low average” described the very same iq range as slow learners were said to have. they said “low average” carries the risk of being a self-fulfilling prophecy for children without the benefit of being a label that leads to additional services. in addition to this, the authors did an interesting experiment. they found one hundred and ninety six archived i.q. tests from a private clinic in an urban centre in alberta and rescored these tests using a different scoring system that was also considered acceptable in the field7. they found that a full eighteen percent of the classifications changed by one category, from low average to average for example. no wonder these slow learners were disappearing. you could make them come and go by how you scored the test. the authors who did the rescoring experiment were pretty critical about the practice of denying struggling students special education services on the basis of their low average iq tests. i wondered why this would even happen. i found an answer to this, though not a very satisfying one, on the previous psychologist’s website. it was in her answer to another f.a.q8. “if these students struggle so much, why do are they often not eligible for special education?” 6 claypool, murusiak, & janzen (2008). 7 the rescoring involved replacing the “symbol search” subtest instead of the “coding” subtest as one of the measures in determining full scale i.q. 8 king (2006). williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 9 special education services are provided for students who have a disability. slow learners typically do not have a disability, even though they need extra support. cognitive abilities are too high for these learners to be considered for an intellectual disability. however, the abilities are usually too low to be considered for a learning disability. i was still suspicious of the claims these sources were making about this group of students, but now something new was bugging me too. if i had it right, it seemed strange to me that in many jurisdictions a special education system had evolved such that it routinely excluded from special services a whole group of learners that the intelligence tests the system seemed to value so highly predicted would struggle at school. “where have the slow learners gone?” indeed. maybe my foolish client was on to something after all. a little thrill of danger ran down my spine. i did know, from my conversation with williamson, a place where some of the slow learners in alberta had gone. it was an instructional tier offered to struggling high school students in some schools. williamson seemed to have mixed feeling about it; then again i didn’t know that that meant either williamson seemed to have mixed feelings about everything. i typed in “knowledge and employability (k & e) classes.” i got several hits. i selected the third item down called “accountability pillar results for annual education results report”9 because i wanted to know who was accountable for these classes. i always wanted to know who was accountable. i was rewarded with a complex document showing various statistics about student achievement and about parent and student perceptions about the general quality of education in the province. “dead end,” i thought. it wasn’t telling me anything about k & e or slow learners. i was about to close the site when i saw the phrase “high school completion rate.” this seemed important, but why? i remembered williamson griping that the students who took this level of classes left school with a credential called the k & e certificate, a credential widely seen as less valuable than the alberta high school diploma. surely if there were even half as many slow learners around as the previous data claimed and they really did have as tough of a time in school as the information about the categories suggested, these k & e classes would be an inevitable path for many of them. the completion results would surely show a significant minority of alberta’s students earning the k & e certificate instead of the high school diploma. i started to look at the stats on this. now that i was in the right section they were easy to find, but not so easy to believe. in 2009, 30,689 students completed high school in three years having earned a high school diploma; 305 completed earning a k & e certificate of achievement. in 2008, 30,500 students completed high school with the diploma, 266 completed with the certificate in the same year. in 2007, 30,105 diplomas, 255 certificates. i rubbed my eyes and looked again, i thought maybe i’d missed a zero. if up to eighteen percent of students were slow learners why were less than one percent of students completing high school with the credential intended for slow learners? “maybe the high school diploma route isn’t so bad for them” i thought, “maybe most of the slow learners manage to scrape through at the higher instructional level.” but what if they didn’t? i looked at the drop our rates for the same five years. for several years running a quarter of the year’s cohort of potential graduates had not completed high school within the three expected years,10 it rose a little to eighty percent when another two years 9 alberta education (2008, 2009, 2010).   10 alberta education (2008, 2009, 2010). williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 10 beyond the expected three were added. i wondered how many of the drop-outs were slow learners? “how do students get lost?” i pondered for a second. i realized one of the main ways was by not completing school. the mystery was coming into focus for me. i felt all tingly; the hairs on the back of my neck were standing at attention. suddenly there was an arm around my throat. so eager had i been to begin my investigation, put this case to bed nice and early, i hadn’t really taken a good look at my foul neighbor at the next computer station. now he was choking me from behind. the full force of the rotting smell hit me with the last breath i was able to take before he cinched my throat shut. as massive, fleshy arms tightened around me i brought my feet up to my desk and pushed backwards with all my strength. the desk thudded against the wall, giving me what i thought was good leverage for dislodging my assailant but he easily absorbed the force and the chokehold just got tighter. my peripheral vision beheld a profile of a part of a pallid face and a bulging eye, black as an eight ball. i wrenched to one side, the hold just got tighter. i looked to the entrance of the library; the old guard was sleeping in his chair. for some reason, my eyes fixed for a second on the computer i was operating. the escape key was missing. someone didn’t appreciate me poking around this category, i realized. my indignation at the story arriving at this point was short-lived as everything went black. later in the story… the entrance exam the sun threw little daggers at me through the gaps in the dirty curtains, interrupting what felt like the first moments of sound sleep i had experienced since awakening from a strange dream. during the night i’d dreamt i was at the dinner table, a shrill voice was telling me “don’t let your meat touch your potatoes, don’t let your potatoes touch your peas” over and over again. i looked down, fork in hand, to try to follow the instructions, make sure my portions were orderly. my plate was filled with hundreds of tiny children, dressed in white, brown and green, skittering across the plate with the unsettling speed of fleeing mice. i rolled over and looked at the clock. it was quarter to eleven. my head hurt, it was still throbbing from the beating i took at the library and the bourbon i took late last night to nurse my wounds. i sat up. i felt sick but not as sick as i ought to, not as sick as i would feel if i had a salaried job11. i tripped over to the window on legs as stiff as stilts. as i looked through the dirty glass with its breathtaking view of a trash bin and narrow industrial road leading out to the ugly main drag, i realized i couldn’t take any more of this on an empty stomach. i spied the adjacent neon sign of a breakfast joint, its glow dulled by the winter daylight. i called williamson and asked if we could meet for breakfast, told him i had some questions. he said his lunch break was at 11:05 so he could meet me then. i made some acrid coffee in the machine provided and changed from the suit i’d slept in to the only other one i’d brought along. i exited the hotel through the main lobby, scraped out a sightline the size of my head on the windshield of the 11 line penned by chandler (1992, p. 44). williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 11 buick, started it up and carefully drove the fifty feet to the restaurant. the cook, the waitress and i made three, a crowd. i sat down and the waitress rambled over with a menu. i ordered black coffee, bacon, toast and a four-egg omelet with extra peppers to kill anything untoward that might be lurking in the grease. i snatched an abandoned section of a newspaper from the table next to me. i read “alberta’s minister of education refers to self as slow learner.”12 apparently while being grilled in the legislature by opposition member, harry chase, about the use of the multiple choice format for provincial standardized exams, hancock, the minister, had referred to himself as a slow learner. i guess he was using some sarcasm of his own to suggest his opponent’s questions were obscure. that was interesting. williamson had said “slow learner” was hidden. in this case, it seemed right out in the open, more available, in fact than other things he might have called himself to make the same point. i’m not the most politically correct guy around but even i realized that, for a variety of reasons, no sensible politician would have chosen to call himself “retarded” even if it was to insult his opponent. williamson showed up looking disheveled already. a lock of his hair was sticking straight up and he’d gotten off track buttoning his shirt. he was off by one and the unsettled fabric stuck out like a fat finger in the middle of his chest. he said he’d been up late again looking for slow learners in his computer. he ordered some sort of fruit cocktail and toast, the cheapest thing on the menu. i asked him the question i’d been wondering about for a while. did any of these slow learners he said had disappeared end up reappearing after high school? instead of answering my question, williamson starting griping, again about the certificate of achievement many of his slow learners end up graduating with instead of the high school diploma, saying how unfair it was that his kids worked so hard but only got a token sort of high school completion credential, one that wouldn’t get them very far after high school. so i challenged him, “so what if some of your k & e students, slow learners… whatever… graduate with a different credential, get credits in different sorts of courses, what’s the big deal? if they can’t handle the normal program isn’t that what should happen? besides, i thought you told me if they did well at this level they could always move back up to the regular program?” i 12 event was actually described on alberta teachers association website (2009) harry chase (lib—calgary-varsity): “because of my inability to interpret educational bafflegab, i have prepared a translation test to help the minister of education qualify and quantify his responses from yesterday, upon which he will be graded, with his results published by the fraser institute. hb pencil ready, mr. minister. multiple-choice tests (a) assume that there’s only one correct response, (b) emphasize the final product over process, (c) are easy and inexpensive to mark, (d) any or all of the above. letter only, please.” minister of education dave hancock: “mr. speaker, being a slow learner, i missed the first part of the question, so i can’t answer the (a), (b), (c), or (d) part.” mr. chase: “grade 12 students don’t have those options. (emphasis added)   williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 12 was already beginning to have my own feelings about this but i wanted to hear what he had to say. williamson looked to be mustering his forces for another of his moralizing salvos, but possibly remembering how i’d reacted last time he tried this, he regrouped and asked a question instead. “you remember how i told you i used to do a lot of work with the high school registered apprenticeship programs13?” i nodded. where was he going with this? “well, one time i was at the apprenticeship and industry training office. i needed some more apprenticeship applications for my students and with the office being so close to my school i found it easier to go there than just asking them to mail them out. there was a kid in front of me in line with his mom, a young man i mean. not a young man like a kid, a young man like eighteen or nineteen.” i loved it when williamson lost control of his labels. he spent so long looking for the right one i was amazed he ever got anything done. he took a breath and continued. “anyhow, i’d overheard as i was waiting behind them that the …son had just graduated from high school, one of the vocational schools where they have k & e, the lower tier only of regular education classes and shop14 classes. during high school he had been indentured as an apprentice mechanic and worked a thousand hours in the trade. he was registering for his first eight weeks of technical, you know, college training, to complete the first year of his apprenticeship. i could hear from the conversation that he started in k & e classes but that he had upgraded during high school and by the time he’d left high school he’d completed the regular high school diploma. his transcript showed he’d enrolled in and passed the right level of math to be automatically accepted, providing that he had been apprenticed, into the college part of his trades training.” “so what was the problem?” i asked, still stymied as to the relevance of any of this. “well the guy at the desk said with k & e courses on his transcript and considering where he went to school he should really write the entrance exam, you know the exam that apprentices who don’t have the pre-requisite courses have to write.” “what? hadn’t he already passed the required math course?” i was confused. 13 a provincial program that enables high school students to begin to earn required hours on the job towards trades certification while also receiving high school course credits for the time they put in alberta learning. alberta learning (2003). 14 alberta’s program of studies gives students the option of more difficult and less difficult classes in all the core areas, english, math, social studies and science. both streams are considered regular education. the lower tier is one level above k & e. alberta education (2013). williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 13 “this was the same question the…apprentice asked. yeah, but the guy at the counter said k & es have a tough time with mechanics training and before wasting a bunch of time and money in the program he should just write the exam to see.” “to see what?” “to see if he could handle the coursework for the program he was enrolling in, i guess.” “so, what happened?” “the apprentice and his mom kept asking if he really had to write the exam of if he could just register. after listening for a while i poked my nose in and, as quietly as i could because i still needed my forms, told the apprentice and his mom that i was sure he had all the prerequisites based on what i’d heard and that they should insist on going ahead and enrolling in the college program, without writing the entrance exam” “did the guy at the counter give in?” “apparently it was getting close to his break time or something and this other worker told the guy she’d take over and processed the application. he kind of shrugged and went on break. after they were done, she handled my request too and when i couldn’t help but comment on the situation that just played out in front of me she told me that her co-worker wasn’t wrong. students from k & e, in their experience, do have a rough time she said.” “is that true?” “it could be. i’ve heard trade school programs are much harder than people think. lots of people probably flunk out. maybe this one would have had trouble too, but he had the prerequisite.” “would you have done more if the guy at the counter dug his heels in?” “i don’t know. i needed the help of the apprenticeship board for a lot of things at the time. i had a lot of students in the apprenticeship program.” the waitress came by to refill our coffee. williamson held out his fruit bowl instead of his cup. he really was a mess. ****************************************************************************** max provides a way to ask an important question: what is the appropriate interpretive response to the procrustean excesses of educational classification these anecdotes describe? the measurement and sorting of students is a serious business, and the rightful critique of the negative consequences and methodological arrogance of these sorting practices can, at times, at least seem to take on a grave character (ervin, n.d.). attempting to have a “serious” conversation about this topic, however, at least if serious is misunderstood as polite, rule-abiding and theoretical, may williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 14 well mean surrendering the hermeneutic vantage point from which the specific, bloody, grotesque truths of educational classification might be revealed. in a strategy that we argue is more effective, disability rights scholars and advocates, particularly those with disabilities, have often taken to playing with disability categorization in satirical artistic representations. phil smith’s (2006) free-verse experimental poem “split-------ting the rock of {speci[es]al} e.ducat.tion: flowers of lang[ue]age in >dis