microsoft word old dog, same trick.docx corresponding author: david w. jardine university of calgary email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics november 26, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 guest editorial: old dog. same trick. david w. jardine your cause of sorrow must not be measured by his worth, for then it hath no end. ross to siward, on the death of siward's son. macbeth, act v, scene viii give sorrow words: the grief that does not speak whispers the o'er-fraught heart and bids it break. malcolm to macduff. macbeth, act iv, scene iii “the individual case . . . is never simply a case; it is not exhausted by being a particular example of a universal law or concept” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 39). there is no such a “thing” as sorrow or grief. it is always this lamenting in this arc of telling, of seasons, of breath and faces. to paraphrase john caputo (1993), sorrow always involves proper names; grieving is always one's own and, one way or another, in one shape or another, “from it no one can be exempt” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 356). that we might commiserate in such matters is not made possible by each of us deflecting upwards into some governing concept or essence or law or theme under which our sorrows fall. my sorrow does not find much voice or relief in such falling. it is not given words but is taken away and rendered and handed back as bones. “the rule does not comprehend it” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 39). we don’t experience our affinity via this abstracting route. commiseration cannot be sought in experiencing ourselves as examples or instances. affinity is, instead, a lateral pass, one of kinship, kindness, love. in these matters, i am always, for good or ill, someone, full of gesture jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 editorial 2 2 and just this word and withholding and waiting and perhaps embrace. and just this error of having waited too long full of good intent. all this. i find myself nearly apologizing to some of the people who’ve read this. this work is hard to bear and, if it works (and it doesn't always work, and its working is in the hands of those to whom it is addressed), it’s hard to put down. and i’ll admit that there is a resounding joy to it precisely because of this. “free spaces” (gadamer, 1992, p. 59) and some relief, some lifting and lightening, some setting it down by taking it up and setting it down in words. so yesterday, november 3, 2014. father and grown daughter outside the bragg creek vet’s place, big and old great pyrenees on a leash, matted and woolly and friendly and black and white. big splayed paws a good six inches across. well trod and often. inside to buy dog food, and, i’d say by her age and carriage, a woman and wife and mother, a bit in tears as she and the doctor emerge from a side room. yep. got it. it’s time, it seems. and that semblance swirls up and around in the air. made sure i stopped on the way back to the truck to tell the old thing that he’s a good dog. a little unspoken thanks. you need to thank your teachers, but the best thanks is turning away and practicing the teaching. the language of this intimacy is a rough ride. every pull towards generalities feels like a betrayal and yet i must give sorrow words. i can “identify” with that spot these neighbors seem to be in, but that word is too easy to use, too flip. part of it is the coming due of the silent bargain some of us have made with these domestics. i remember a black-humored version laughed over years ago with friends: “don't worry. when the time comes, i will kill you.” hah! yes. i will. i promise. i can identify with the spot they are in precisely because of how we are identical. our cases are incommensurate and that is how we are the same. that is how each new case is an act of revival and rejuvenation, not just repetition. that is how our kinship remains alive, there in that unspoken parking lot. our kinship is not identity under a rule but is had in, and through, the incommensurate and stubborn grace of particularity. we lean towards. we hear beckons. we are properly stilled and summoned. this child, this patient, this turn of phrase in a text, this upwell of warm air coming up off the wood for winter, that old fido full of specific fidelities and keeps of memory, makes me stop over it and wait for what is to come. thus our cases, each intimate, need names and faces and occasions to be what they are. sit. stay. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 editorial 2 3 ivy. that was my dog’s name. ivy, right there all over again, up and run in that chance morning meeting of pets and coos and matted feet and leash pulled taut in the air of coming grief. ivy’s flesh being only half torn to bits by an inefficient cougar that didn’t finish the job. the weight of her in my arms, tipping back in blood and glazed look and the sizzle-panic nickelspittle rush for what turned out to be useless help. my being drawn to this morning event is thus a lateral pass. it is not a passage through some shared “identity,” but a passage into the passible kinship of the flesh, the eyes that see ghosts shimmering around and nearing from all directions, the big long nose arced up and sniffing something in the air. beheld in my arms. my bones start tearing, but hush now. there is a secret pleasure here, too, to be near this happenstance, this teaching, this moment, and to write in order to stay near and draw others near. say it, then. almost jealousy. that they have such luck to have such proximity to such a great teacher. good boy. i remember after ivy was half-killed and we had to put her down. that’s such a phrase. it summons gravity and the falling of flesh to the earth. but it also says that we had to put her down, because if we didn’t put her down we couldn’t bear the weight of it. and those post-traumatic reveries, still close and fraught and suddening, still imagining her running towards me down off the green hill, and having to say, again: “no, ivy. go.” good girl. references caputo, j. (1993) against ethics: contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. bloomington, in: indiana state university press. gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method. new york, ny: continuum books. gadamer, h.g. (1992). the idea of the university--yesterday, today, tomorrow (pp. 47-62). in d. misgeld & g. nicholson (eds. & trans.), hans-georg gadamer on education, poetry, and history: applied hermeneutics. albany, ny: suny. microsoft word mouleseditorial.docx corresponding author: dr. nancy j. moules email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics july16, 2012 the author(s) 2012 editorial dr. david jardine and the “descartes lecture”: twenty years of miraculous returns nancy j moules in 1995, i was a master’s student in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary taking my first graduate nursing course in qualitative research. our professor, dr. marjorie mcintyre, informed us that she had invited a professor from the faculty of education for a guest lecture. she had become acquainted with dr. david jardine’s hermeneutic endeavor through a mutual teacher and outstanding scholar, dr. ted aoki. dr. mcintyre advised us in advance to “expect the unexpected” and that there was the potential of our worlds being shaken up over the three hours with dr. jardine. on the day he was to lecture, i arrived to class early to find a somewhat unconventional looking man in leather pants and bare feet, fiddling rather ineptly with the technical equipment in the room and i wondered if he was the media person who was setting up the equipment for class. once the rest of the class arrived, dr. mcintryre introduced this barefooted, long haired man as dr. jardine and turned the class over to him. for an hour and a half, we were transfixed, gently, yet almost audaciously and sometimes boldly invited into a philosophical and historical vortex that spun us around, indeed turning our taken-for-granted and assumed worlds and understandings upside down. dr. jardine began the class with the reading of the late bronwen wallace poem, “appeal,” taken from her collection of poetry, the stubborn particulars of grace” (1987). he started by taking us into the ordinary, everyday world we all recognized and then he took us back through history to show how we got to where we could recognize such a thing and recognize such a thing differently. after a tracing of this history and an understanding of how, in fact, the natural and human sciences bifurcated and ended up in a place of shadows, truth, imitation, and certainty, we took a coffee break and returned to room to bring our topics to the discussion. the topics that showed up in this discussion were issues of human concern hermeneutics applied to the moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 7 2 worlds of practice professions: nursing, social work, education, and psychology to name a few. dr. jardine gently cradled our topics and with the skill of a master interpreter helped us see what was beneath the obvious, what was addressing us, what we were not hearing in the “data,” and what the topic was asking of us. he ended the class with the final poem in wallace’s (1987, pp. 110-111) book, called “particulars,” the last stanza of which reads: and to say for myself, just once, without embarrassment, bless, thrown out as to some lightness that i actually believe in, surprised (as i believe they were) to find it here, where it seems impossible that one life even matters, though like them, i’ll argue the stubborn argument of the particular, right now, in the midst of things, this and this. i completed my phd in 2000 (with dr. janice bell as my supervisor), conducting a gadamerian hermeneutic study, and like my contemporaries, like those students before us, and the many students to come, i was exquisitely mentored by dr. jardine in hermeneutic understanding, tradition, and how to conduct “good” research which did not misappropriate or betray this tradition. in 2004, i began teaching the master’s level qualitative research course in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary, and in the same year, dr. dianne tapp and i developed a course in hermeneutic phenomenology (binding, moules, tapp, & rallison, 2007). in 2010, i began teaching the doctoral level qualitative research course. in all of these three courses and in every offering of them, i have invited dr. jardine to attend as a visiting lecturer, using the 3 hours to offer his “descartes lecture” as i have come to call it. this past winter, i asked permission to tape the lecture, had it transcribed, and suggested david submit it to the journal of applied hermeneutics as an invited submission. hundreds (if not thousands) of students across disciplines have heard this talk over time, some many times, as i have known of students who have taken david’s courses, and returned to audit them several times because of what they gain from them. with each offering of this lecture, the talk is somewhat different; something new emerges. i personally have heard it over two dozen times, and i am as transfixed every time, as much as i was the first time. this lecture is a legacy that i am proud to publish in our journal. what happens in the second part of the class after the lecture is what is more difficult to describe and why we chose not to transcribe that part of this recent class that we recorded. the students disperse at the coffee break, heads spinning, sometimes looking like deer in headlights. they return to class after the break, with their topics of research or study trying to take hold of something, trying to find traction. it is here that we see what wallace (1987, p. 13) wrote in appeals: as if they hoped to find that opening in each of us from which, long after we’d been told what happened next, they could begin their slower, more miraculous returns. the topics showed up: all the unsettling, upsetting, exuberant conversations about nurses working with children who die; domestic violence; the love of teaching children to learn to love math; the responsibilities and decision making of nurses who work triage in emergency departments; the inescapable human dramas of aging, dementia, love, death, suffering, and joys. as each topic found its moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 7 3 way into the conversation, hermeneutics joined it and, as is the case with all good hermeneutic work, hermeneutics itself disappears as the topic, and the topics themselves come to light through the delicate, rigorous, and courageous work of interpretation. this is work that makes sense only in the face-to-face encounter that cannot be captured on tape or in description; it is the real work of hermeneutics. it is the miraculous return of the topic, where there really is no “method” to it. it is the arrival of understanding that happens with an acute attentiveness to the topic, and a practiced art of strengthening. the openings the students and their topics sought were portals that hermeneutics and aletheia offer an enlivening and remembering of something that was forgotten, lost, or left. there is a buoyancy in this part of the class as we realize that all of this tradition and history and oppression is, in fact, joyous, enlightening, and offers something. this second half is different every time, but there is something present that echoes gadamer’s (1989) words: …in deciphering and interpreting...a miracle takes place: the transformation of something alien and dead into total contemporaneity and familiarity…that is why the capacity…to understand…is like a secret art, even a magic that frees and binds us. (pp. 163-164) like all good magic, some things cannot be explained, or should not be explained. dr. jardine came to the faculty of education at the university of calgary in a somewhat “roundabout” way. he completed his undergraduate degree in philosophy and religious studies in 1973 at mcmaster university in hamilton. his ma supervisor was g.b. madison, who brought hans-georg gadamer to mcmaster while david was studying there. professor madison had paul ricouer as his supervisor in paris. david’s phd supervisor, dr. dieter misgeld, had studied under first gadamer and then habermas. dr. jardine started at the university of calgary in 1986. professor jardine has published 83 refereed journal articles, 35 book chapters, and 8 books on ecological, philosophical, hermeneutic, and buddhist studies of various facets of educational theory and practice. i have no doubt that dr. david jardine will, in time (in his lifetime, i hope) be renowned as one of the most astute and profound hermeneutic scholars and prolific writers of the past three decades. for now, i am content to proudly call david my teacher, my mentor, my colleague, and my friend. references binding, l., moules, n.j., tapp, d.m., & rallison, l. (2007). hermeneutic musings on learning: the dialogical nature of teaching interpretively. journal of educational thought, 41(2), 179-189. gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.) (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. wallace, b. (1987). appeal. in the stubborn particulars of grace (pp. 11-13). toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. wallace, b. (1987). particulars. in the stubborn particulars of grace (pp. 110-111). toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. microsoft word strong corrected proof.docx corresponding author: dr. tom strong email: strongt@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics april 13, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 twins philosophically separated at birth? a review of groundless ground: a study of wittgenstein and heidegger tom strong review groundless ground: a study of wittgenstein and heidegger lee braver cambridge, ma: mit books, 2014 isbn-13: 978-0262526043 370 pages keywords heidegger, wittgenstein, postfoundationalism, review groundless grounds is all we have ever had, which proves their adequacy. lee braver, 2014, p. 215 the modern scientific project aimed to get things right using proper names that could be mapped on to foundational knowledge, yielding what hillary putnam (1981) critiqued as an unattainable “god’s eye view” of reality. both born in 1889, both initially seduced by a philosophical dream of articulating foundational reality, and each to become one of the 20th century’s most influential philosophers, ludwig wittgenstein and martin heidegger are typically regarded as having very different philosophical projects, though each attacked science’s purported “ground.” wittgenstein, protégé of bertrand russell, took logical positivism to what many saw as its analytical apex, only to later quite publicly abandon this approach for a view of meaning grounded in “language games.” heidegger, protégé of edmund husserl who had been aiming to make a strong journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 6 2 science of subjectivity with his phenomenology, reformulated subjectivity as “being,” invoking temporal, contextual, relational engagements and performances. in their respective intellectual journeys, both wittgenstein and heidegger took head on the notion that science and philosophy could correctly name and map the foundations of reality. my personal interest in braver’s (2014) groundless grounds relates to how interpretive ideas can be adapted to frontline helping practices. i have grown increasingly concerned about how philosophy of science arguments keep being used to suppress an interpretive and relational approach to practice (e.g., strong & busch, 2013). modern “r”ealist science is alive and well, promising practitioners and the public that human problems can be correctly named and mapped on to foundational knowledge from which prescriptive solutions are warranted. underpinning scientific arguments of this kind is a view that objective (i.e., untainted by human meaning and contact, see daston & galison, 2007), knowledge is obtainable and should trump any forms of knowing developed through human interaction. this particular philosophy of science is antithetical to any notion that interpretive, relational work could be ethical, valid, or helpful. without strong counter-arguments to bolster an interpretive and relational approach to helping, such notions of helpfulness can seem easily discreditable in these days of evidence-based practice. needed by the modern science approach, it seems, are “how-to” scripts and foundational knowledge to guide one’s helping; less important are the pragmatic immediacies of humans relating and understanding. my understanding of the postmodern and social constructionist upheavals in late 20th century human science and service work was that different, relational grounds were becoming accessible to family and narrative therapists like myself. however, in the early stages of self-identifying in this way, i felt inadequately grounded in interpretive ideas that could shore up a compatible philosophy of science that supported this approach to practice, and so i read (lock & strong, 2010). my reading inevitably brought me to wittgenstein and heidegger as key thinkers whose ideas had applicability to my preferred ways of practice. lee braver’s groundless grounds is an ambitious and groundbreaking volume for making rigorous comparisons of two intellectual giants seldom juxtaposed. this would not be a good introductory book to the thinking of either wittgenstein or heidegger (see monk, 1990 or richardson 2012, for their respective biographies), and is targeted more for those who have been rewarded by reading wittgenstein’s (1953) philosophical investigations or heidegger’s (1962) being and time. as any reader of their books can tell you, the challenging prose of each book is compounded by the counter-intuitiveness of their revolutionary ideas. many readers are unaware of how steeped they are in the foundational grounding of modern science, that reading either (later) wittgenstein or heidegger can initially leave them feeling their intelligence is being insulted, until unrecognized, bedrock assumptions, get dislodged with vertigo-inducing consequences. it is the comprehensiveness and brilliance with which both wittgenstein and heidegger took on their respective philosophical projects that makes them the 20th century’s most influential philosophers. braver’s project, which in my estimation succeeds well, is to bridge what each thinker was doing, finding parallels in wittgenstein and heidegger where former scholars saw distinct, possibly incommensurable, ideas and approaches. braver helps readers move through some of the most obvious parallels accessibly and informatively. while wittgenstein launched his philosophizing down the foundational path with his analytic philosophy classic, tractatus logico-philosophicus, he abandoned this direction bestrong journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 6 3 cause of its idealizations, and lack of hubris (philosophers cannot articulate a foundational urlanguage of science). like heidegger (though there is only one cited instance of wittgenstein mentioning him at a meeting of the vienna circle), both turned to how people did everyday life using means and terms that were real for them. each philosopher adopted an anthropological stance, focusing on in many cases what polanyi (1967) would refer to as the “tacit dimension” of everyday life. in particular each was interested in how life was performed meaningfully (i.e., for the people so engaged) in taken for granted interactions. this interest is a striking departure from the atomistic views of prior thinkers, that discrete essences of meaning could be severed from the activities in which they find their immediate relevance and significance, and studied as foundational knowledge of material reality. both wittgenstein and heidegger took up linguistic views of meaning based on how words were used, as moves in “language games” (wittgenstein) or as “equipment” in teleological activities (heidegger). most important, however, for braver, is their antifoundationalism. it was this turn away from discoverable foundations which has drawn the greatest heat from critics. charges of relativism and nihilistic semanticism have been the usual first line of attack on those taking up the ideas of wittgenstein and heidegger. it is, however, precisely here that a new kind of grounding – a socio-cultural grounding – is central to the arguments of both thinkers. the grounds are participatory, relational interactions that, over time, acquire the force of habit, customs to which we hold ourselves and each other. this extends to the language we communicate in our interactions, situated evaluations of what is proper or good, and the (“foundationshaking”) disruptions caused when our interactions defy custom and expectation. the human world both wittgenstein and heidegger were pointing to cannot be atomized, its meanings and customs obtain through agreement and trusting perpetuation. there is a difference being inside and engaged with this human world than there could ever be if one took seriously the abstract, “objectively detached,” claims of the modern foundationalists, as braver (2014) underscores: this groundlessness would make thought viciously circular were we trying to enter it from the outside – if, that is, starting from the epistemological veil of ignorance, we were to try justifying the principle of seeking reasons. fortunately, being has “graced” us by “throwing” us into this circle in the first place…thrownness is a gift that enables, not an existential burden that compromises. (p. 202) braver is a clear and gifted writer, well up to the task of communicating the overlaps and complements he invites readers to find in the thinking of wittgenstein and heidegger, who, in his colourful prose, “dig up descartes to kill him off” (p. 8) or were “weaning us off the hunger for explanations” (p. 152). he is not without mild criticism for either writer, seeing in heidegger, for example, an obsession with phenomenological writing about “being” (braver: “even a committed heideggerian like myself must concede that his chronic invocations of being can approach selfparody, a kind of ontological tourette’s syndrome”, 2014, p. 130). wittgenstein imports an animalistic nature to account for human finitude, habitual interacting, and the animating impetus for such interacting (braver again: “wittgenstein wants to help us face the knotted squalor of the real, to force our heavenward gaze down to the detritus of practice”, p. 226). what braver does best is set up previously unconsidered juxtapositions, like this one on wittgenstein’s private language argument: “as wittgenstein’s ‘private’linguists can only introspect with public tools, so for heidegger ‘knowing oneself is grounded in being with’” (p. 165). strong journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 6 4 of course, there are differences between these two philosophical giants which are downplayed in braver’s book for the intended similarities and complementarities. wittgenstein grounds his view of meaning in language games, and apart from referring to these as habit-like, disregards the kind of historicism and “care” one finds in heidegger. later heidegger grew increasingly mystical and focused on poetic excellence, while wittgenstein turned his attention more fully on errors he saw in the philosophy of science. what braver has done is tapped obvious and not so obvious sources for key insights into where both men shared revolutionary projects of unsettling the much idealized ground of modern science. “groundless grounds” does not refer to an oxymoron; it speaks to the historical and cultural arbitrariness and seeming durability of a relational ontology that interpretive and other scholars are still coming to terms with. references braver, l. (2014). groundless ground: a study of wittgenstein and heidegger. cambridge, ma: mit press. daston, l., & galison, p. (2007). objectivity. new york, ny: zone books. heidegger, m. (1962). being and time (j. macquarrie & e. robinson, trans.). toronto, on, canada: harper collins. (original published in german in 1927). lock, a. j., & strong, t. (2010). social constructionism: sources and stirrings in theory and practice. new york, ny: cambridge university press. monk, r. (1990). ludwig wittgenstein: the duty of genius. new york, ny: penguin. polanyi, m. (1967). the tacit dimension. new york, ny: doubleday anchor. putnam, h. (1981). reason, truth, and history. new york, ny: cambridge university press. richardson, j. (2012). heidegger. new york, ny: routledge. strong, t., & busch, r. (2013). dsm-5 and evidence-based family therapy? australian and new zealand journal of family therapy, 34(2), 90-103. wittgenstein, l. (1953). philosophical investigations (g. e. m. anscombe, trans.). oxford, uk: blackwell. wittgenstein, l. (1961). tractatus logico-philosophicus (d. f. pears & b. f. mcguinness, trans.; introduction, b. russell). london, uk: routledge & kegan paul (originally published in german in 1921) microsoft word jardine.docx corresponding author: dr. david w. jardine email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics august 19, 2013 the author(s) 2013 guest editorial: morning thoughts on application david w. jardine the text . . .if it is to be understood properly i.e., according to the claim it makes-must be understood at every moment, in every concrete situation, in a new and different way. understanding here is always application. hans-georg gadamer (1989, p. 309) truth and method below is an amazing passage in light of gadamer’s thoughts on application and how interpretation makes little sense “in general.” its character only starts to appear once it is applied to a topic, a case, a locale, an instance. only in the face of the specific resistances and demands that the case brings, is interpretation able to “work.” the individual case is thus “fecund,” not only in the sense that its new arrival demands that what has been previously established open itself up to the arriving sense of potency and possibility and demand that the new case brings (thus demonstrating the deep and unavoidable impermanence of such establishments). it is also fecund in the sense that facing and working through such moments of arrival, again and again, is how getting “good” at interpretation happens it is fecund in relation to my ability to work interpretively. that is why it is always i, myself, who must take this venture. it is also why understanding a hermeneutic study requires precisely such a venture from readers. interpretation is, in this sense, an ongoing practice that takes practice to become practiced in. one’s “general” ability in this regard is the product of something specific being repeatedly practiced, and, therefore, it never becomes simply a method that can be handed over to someone unpracticed. it is always a practice whose practice can, and must be, cultivated in order to be understood. “understanding here is always application,” and this includes understanding a hermeneutic study and understanding how to “do” hermeneutic work. hermeneutic work is thus always both about application and cultivated at the locales of application. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 9 2 so, now, the amazing passage that parallels this hermeneutic arc. it is from volume two of tsong-kha-pa’s (2004), the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment, originally composed in 1406 ce: it is an extremely important point. if you train in these attitudes of impartiality, love and compassion without distinguishing and taking up specific objects of meditation, but only using a general object from the outset, you will just seem to generate these attitudes. then, when you try to apply them to specific individuals, you will not be able to actually generate these attitudes toward anyone. but once you have a transformative experience towards an individual in your meditations practice . . .you may then gradually increase the number of individuals you visualize within your meditation. (tsong-kha-pa, 2004, p. 35). this passage highlights why, earlier in this text, tsong-kha-pa stated that we must avoid falling into the “problems of peace” (p. 24). our professions teaching, nursing, counseling, working with troubled students in schools, or any other locale of interpretive venture in the face of some face in the world do not lead us to seek our own peace separate from the suffering of the world, but seek, rather, to “take on a life of suffering . . . in order to help all living beings” (p. 29). this is a life, shall we say, of enduring and undergoing, of venture, hidden as these images are in gadamer’s use of the term erfahrung for the sort of “experience” from which we might learn (with its etymological root fahren, to journey, venture, and its other derivative, vorfahren, those who have ventured “before” [vor-], i.e., ancestors). this is why gadamer (1989, p. 356) cited in this regard an idea central to his hermeneutics that is inherited from the greek tragedies of aeschylus (c. 525 bce): pathei mathos, “learning through suffering.” hermeneutically understood, our professions are not seeking theories or explanations or models or interventions that promise to pacify or cure the life-world and its woes. we know precisely how often such promises have not only come to grief but unwittingly caused suffering. we know, too, from alice miller’s (1989) work, how education in particular was once, and in many ways, still is, quite witting about such matters of inflicting suffering, as miller’s title announces, “for your own good.” still and all, and despite the understandable hesitancy that must surround our work, that work requires that we “remain in the realm in which beings dwell” (tsong-kha-pa, 2004, p. 30). we turn toward suffering, again and again. this is akin to hermeneutics persistently turning towards the lifeworld and not away from it to some edenic world of essences cast in peaceful, finalized composure; this is how hermeneutics takes on part of the phenomenological lineages of a return to lived-experience whilst jettisoning edmund husserl’s frightened desire to quell that life with the eidetic reduction. hermeneutics interprets, not in order to thematize, essentialize, or placate, but in order to let our troubles be what they are, thus ameliorating our fraught “if onlys” and therefore making clear-sightedness and welljudged action possible. letting it be what it is involves, in some sense, freeing ourselves from our attachment to it: “to rise above the pressure of what impinges on us from the world means to keep oneself so free from what one encounters of the world that one can present it to oneself as it is” (gadamer, 1989, p. 444). tsong-kha-pa does say, earlier in the text, that “those who have developed jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 9 3 the . . .spirit of enlightenment and [thus] aspire [to it], although they lack its application, still ‘shine’” (2004, p. 16). i think, with student teachers for example, who sometimes desperately ask where to begin, of how taking on the spirit of interpretability is the key (tsong-kha-pa calls this “aspiration”). it means, simply put, proceeding in light of an understanding of the interpretability of the world, seeking those dependent co-arisings that surround things, and resisting the logic of substance (gadamer, 1989, p. 242) and the temptations of reification (tsong-kha-pa, 2002, p. 120), both of which aim to suppress the uprisings of the world and seek false permanencies in this, the deeply human land of shadow. even if you have not often practiced the application of such a spirit and have not therefore, built up the composures of practice, still, it is in this spirit that one proceeds in the repeated practice of application. again, however, the repeated practice of application is essential: “if you have only an intellectual understanding of this spirit, then you likewise have only an intellectually understanding of what it means to be a . . .practitioner” (p. 17). it is always this child’s life, that parent’s woes, this client’s nightmare, that patient’s desire to let go in the face of impending death, that is key. interpretation always requires doing the work again in the face of the task we face. it is good to hear that: the more you practice these things, the more accustomed your mind will become to them, and the easier it will be to practice what you had initially found difficult to learn. (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 185-186) however, our proper relation to such matters must always and everywhere be rewon, here, and here. this is where is borne the deep hesitancy that is part of hermeneutic work (see jardine, in press), and about such hesitancy, both hermeneutics and buddhism are steadfast. our composure must always be re-gained, re-dedicated to the work at hand. our becoming experienced practitioners always involves venturing out all over again always having to suffer once again the exigencies of existence and their lessons and, as i have found in my own work, that there the fellowship (sangha) of such work is a great comfort. it is in this common fortitude or strength that the strength of hermeneutics lays, even though part of its demand is that i myself and no one else must take on this dedication and no one can take it on in my stead. it is with no irony at all, however, that tsong-kha-pa (2004, p. 182-207, emphasis added) names this “joyous perseverance.” it is thus that pathei mathos can shed something of its dour countenance. very early morning, bragg creek ab, july 16, 2013 biography david w. jardine, phd is a professor in the faculty of education at the university of calgary. references gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method. (j. weinsheimer, trans.). new york, ny: continuum books. jardine, d. (in press). “you’re very clever young man”: on the truth of suffering that lies at the heart of a hermeneutic pedagogy. in d. jardine, g. mccaffrey, & c. gilham (in press). on the pedagogy of suffering: jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 9 4 hermeneutic and buddhist meditations. new york, ny: peter lang. miller, a. (1989). for your own good: hidden cruelty in child-rearing and the roots of violence. toronto, on, canada: collins. tsong-kha-pa (2002). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume three. ithaca ny: snow lion. tsong-kha-pa (2004). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume two. ithaca ny: snow lion. microsoft word field editorial corrected proof.docx corresponding author: james c. field, phd email: jfield@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics may 13, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 invited guest editorial quaint memories of puzzling through mysteries james c. field the incompleteness of meaning and the finitude of understanding suggest that the subject matters (die sache) of understanding are mysteries rather than problems. mysteries are not subject to the methodological solutions problems are. a problem denotes a difficulty demanding a solution. mysteries however can only be understood more deeply. they are not to be explained away but are to be discerned as an ever-present limit to our understanding. they invoke an apprehension of a radical limitlessness. (davey, 2006, p. 29) i had the good fortune of supervising john’s thesis—a mysterious venture to be sure, because when we started, neither the path nor the destination were clear. memory and the workings of time have robbed me of the exact sequence of things--as ricouer (2004) noted in his last great work, there is a “shadowy underside to the bright region of memory” p. 21). the “bright regions of memory” that remain are what ricouer (2004) called the “memory-events,” where something in particular happened, and they arise in perception again, not as simple recollection, but as an “evocation of the absent-present” (p. 35). this is to say they re-occur as events, mixed inevitably with forgetting, imagination, and a trace of consequences. one suffers them, undergoes them in their “presence” anew. it must be said that the “suffering” involved in the case of remembering how john’s work unfolded is what ricouer (2004) called a “happy memory”: the joy and the learning that resulted from the event are fused to the occurrence itself, lending significance, supplying a surplus of pleasure, engendering, once again, the joy of “being there.” but enough of that, for this is not meant to be a treatise on memory, but a re-membering of what field journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 4 2 happened, and what was learned from it. i wanted to set out a brief description of what i mean by the phrase, i remember when i use it, not so much as a claim to recalling “exactly what happened,” for that is impossible, but more as an attempt to stay true to the shards that remain: what is still felt, the learning and thinking that persists, that is, the application of the memories that remains in play. i remember what was “there” from the very beginning of john’s dissertation, in the heideggerian sense, so also “not there,” but certainly “there enough” that it spoke the loudest to john, was this phenomenon that would not go away/constantly slipped away: those students designated by the system, by many of the teachers, by many of us in academe, as “slow learners.” there they sat, smack in the middle of john’s practice, staring back at him, calling out to him, but more pressingly, “calling him out,” as ricoeur (1992) might have said, and then disappearing. i remember being drawn into the topic, listening to john as he unfolded what he faced in his practice: these particular students were in a fix, and it wasn’t one of their own making. the stakes were high; these were largely forgotten beings, concealed in a system that recognized them, unofficially—but then, briefly revealed, quickly abandoned them to their own devices. many, far too many, of these students struggled silently and disappeared into oblivion, quietly jumping out, falling out, or being pushed out of the system. as john so passionately maintained, this was our loss as well: these were students with hidden talents, in need of cultivation, talent that john could see, and marvelously, helped me see. listening to john, i could sense his desperation and frustration; he wanted to help, and in his own way, in his own school, in a room that invited everyone in that needed help, he did. but that wasn’t enough, not for john, but more importantly, not for us, not if we were going to declare that we were educators that didn’t just care for those that did well, but also the less fortunate. ethically, we were enjoined by the topic. i remember in the process of listening, being summoned by this realization: these students were calling out to the part of our selves that was hidden from us, or at least from me. listening to john, my “slow self,” our slow selves, came into view, and a question bubbled up to the surface: which one of us can claim that he or she has never been a slow learner? who hasn’t been that character in a technologically-accelerated world that moves so fast as to be designated “posthuman” (kroker, 2014)? and then another question came, hard on the heels of the first: haven’t we always, when we try to understand, been slow learners? “the owl of minerva flies at night,” for all of us, does it not? more essentially, shouldn’t we all be slow learners? what is “dwelling” for heidegger, or “whiling” for gadamer, if not the necessary, slow, lived-through, suffered experience required to understand things differently? i remember the question of how to proceed rearing its head. what to do, with whom, when, and how much, in the face of this intriguing “practical mystery,” full of appearances, disappearances, dead-ends and detours? there was a point where the “method” for the study, and the structure and genre of the thesis were still completely undecided, not that we were dumbfounded, nor plunged into nietzsche’s abyss, because the topic had its solid leads, and its intrigue, but the way forward did not yet exist. this is where the experience of working this out really took on the shape of an adventure. we were being launched into something, and while i might not have realized it at the time, it was as romano (2012) wrote, a journey of no return. i no longer think of dissertations, nor being a supervisor, in the way that i did, there are now new possibilities in field journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 4 3 front of me. partly the need for adventure was of our own doing, because john had proposed, and i agreed, that he do something different, in form and in structure, with his dissertation. mostly though, i think we realized that we had to attend to this as a mystery, to remain true to its mysterious character, and not, as davey (2006) reminded us, treat what confronted us as a scientific problem to be solved through method, but rather as something that must be ventured into. i remember john’s e-mail proposing to do the dissertation as a hard-boiled detective novel, and it immediately struck me as the right thing to do. within the hour—at least as i remember it, i wrote him back and said, simply “go for it.” we were off, and i remember feeling ecstatic, but also, more than a little intimidated. i was haunted at times by questions, visited at late at night, as “hauntology” (kroker, 2014) is wont to do, with doubt: what if it didn’t work? what if we got half-way in, or a year down the road, and had to abandon the project entirely and start over? would the dissertation survive a train wreck like that? would john survive? would i? even if the work flourished between us, there was no guarantee that it would survive formal examination. the question of how a dissertation like this would be received was with us for a long, long time. would other academics see this as a foolish, undisciplined flight of fancy (we constantly asked, toward the end of the drafting process when the piece approached 400 pages, “who the hell will we get for an external”?), or would the rigor of the work be visible to an academic eye not familiar with the tradition and the genre? i certainly did not excuse myself from the ability or inability to see “goodness” or potential in a piece of work—blindness, as heidegger reminded us, is part of the human condition of caring deeply, of being right there for someone, fully and deeply engaged, with the best of intentions. i would have to be able to see and say something more than “go for it” at the bottom of every draft. was i up to this? was i up to helping john fulfill the hermeneutic warrants for the study, the requisites of a good hard-boiled detective mystery, as well as allow him to shape something that was uniquely “john’s,” and pass muster in academe? hmmm: the topic, had arrived, kept arriving in fact, in all its “horror and charm” (sartre, 1939). now this might sound a little overstated, it might fall prey too much to the work of imagination, so let me step back for a minute here to try to dispel the existence of states of boundless courage, blind faith, and recklessness on both our parts. i had been on john’s ma thesis committee, so i knew that i could bet on john’s capability as a writer and thinker, his solid understanding of what hermeneutics was about, and his capacity as a skilled, thoughtful, and careful practitioner. john did not pull the idea of doing a noir detective mystery out of thin air, or other places, for that matter, and i didn’t agree to go with him on this adventure simply because it was a bright, shiny, new idea, although that is exactly what it was. i am not sure how it became apparent in our conversations that both of us loved dark, detective mysteries, but i do remember rollicking discussions about them. i had been struck previously about the parallels of detective work with hermeneutics—careful, vigilant, disciplined inquiry, that slowly built its own case for proceeding by dogged, persistent fieldwork, dependent upon the clues that appeared, as questions, by the unanticipated events of the pursuit, by what the investigation revealed, and not by predetermined “police procedure.” good detective work, of the hard-boiled kind, was strikingly similar to what romano (2012) called “evential hermeneutics: elucidating the meaning of the human adventure using events as the guiding thread” (p. 48). the engine of this kind of hermeneutic inquiry is the “profound upheaval” that events provide, and what is revealed when things of import happen to us: field journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 4 4 existence, understanding, truth come into view as events that happen to dasein, and thereby to being as such. understanding is a work of truth; truth is uncovering. these existentials denote, in some way the very event of being. (p. 13) part of the courage to do this came through undergoing: talking things out, working back and forth from what hermeneutics required, to what “hermeneutics warrants” could be fulfilled by the detective noir, and to how to do the “non-fictional” things dissertations require: critical literature reviews, interviews, document analyses. i think the only thing we sacrificed, probably with a little too much glee, was apa style—that we had to sneak through the bureaucratic requirements of doing a phd. fortunately, we had a good committee that saw the value of the work and looked the other way, or maybe it might be more accurate to say they were dazzled by the brightness of the quality of the work, and the style fell into the shadows. one last important point to remind us all of the danger of a hermeneutics that simply ends in the bon homie of agreement: there was a threat to the study that made the hard-boiled noir, and a hard-boiled detective, necessary for both of us. we worried, familiar as we were with each other’s thinking, and with both of us operating out of the same hermeneutic tradition, that there was a danger that we had too much in common, took too many of the same things for granted, saw things too much in the same way. philosophically, theoretically, pedagogically, john and i were on the “same side,” we were for and against the same things. where was the other in our thinking, seeing and conversation? who or what would be “the event” that would shake us out of our slumber, keep us on the “right path of looking” (heidegger, 1999, p. 62), preserve, ironically, through endangering, the authentic, valid character of a journey? enter max, from the other side of town, who could show up at night, like lightening, and expose what was in the shadows of our taken-for-grantedness. you don’t have to like him, there were times that we didn’t, but he is as necessary to this story as trouble is to hermeneutics. i will leave you to him now, and the “horror and the charm” of his hermeneutic trouble-making… references davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding. new york, ny: suny. heidegger, m. (1999). ontology-the hermeneutics of facticity. bloomington, ia: indiana university press. kroker, m. (2014). exits to the post-human future. cambridge, ma: polity press. ricouer, p. (2004). memory, history, forgetting. chicago, il: university of chicago press. ricouer, p. (1992). oneself as another. chicago, il: university of chicago press. romano, c. (2002). event and world. new york, ny: fordham press. field journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 4 5 sartre, p. (1939). intentionality: a fundamental idea of husserl’s phenomenology. journal of the british society for phenomenology, 1(2), 4-5. microsoft word klingle batman template.docx corresponding author: kirsten klingle, m.ed. email: kirsten.klingle@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics july 1, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 batman and the sticky-fingered maiden: psychology as an interpretive practice kirsten klingle abstract this paper is a short reflection on the nature of psychology as an interpretive practice by exploring the question: how, if at all, does interpretation apply to the field of psychology? this author presents the notion that interpretation is relational and that both client and therapist histories shape the individual’s ways of interpreting experience and prejudices that arise in therapeutic practice. keywords interpretation, psychology, hermeneutics if interpretation, as a concept, were a living breathing being, i think it would be female. i think she would be exceptionally quiet, often speaking in a whisper and wearing fuzzy white slippers so as to tread lightly and not give away her presence. i like to think she would have sticky fingers from venturing into many unknown and mysterious places and would be found exploring secluded nooks and camouflaged caves places of darkness that yearn to be exposed and lit from within. her very presence would be experienced by some as desirable, and by others as unwelcome given her tendency to ignite a chemical reaction. she would have a womb filled with preconceived notions, understandings, misunderstandings, personal histories, and internalized beliefs all bumping up against one another like a metal vessel filled with atoms. in the field of psychology, interpretation is an omnipresent force that psychologists and clients alike must appreciate and revere, as this sticky-fingered maiden is a lingering and necessary ingredient for human connection. klingle journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 5 2 interpretation: the significance of relationships interpretation, as i see it from a hermeneutic perspective, is closely bound up with how we understand and make sense of experience. we can only truly and deeply understand experience if we enter into the interpretation of it, and yet we can only interpret an experience if we have some understanding of it. this understanding need not always be in the form of personal experience, as understanding may come from hearing the experience of another. nevertheless, the relationship between interpretation and understanding is both iterative and symbiotic. to add to the complexity of this matter, interpretation also seems to be deeply embedded in relationships. as a counselling psychology student, i believe we (psychologists, also referred to throughout as therapists or practitioners) are constantly in a state of interpretive practice as we seek to understand not only our own experiences, but also the experiences of another, our clients. in this way, the focus is on interpretation as inextricably linked to and enrooted in interpersonal and intrapersonal relationships. we are in something, and that which we are in is relation to the self or another. in a similar vein, we humans, along with our experiences, do not exist in a vacuum. we are constantly being shaped by other inhabitants and the greater world around us, while at the same time shaping others. the practice of psychology, more specifically, can be thought of as a microcosm whereby this interaction between two beings has the power to shape and change both parties. for this change to take form, the psychological practice depends on the porosity of humans, that we can be touched, moved, and transformed by our own experiences and by bearing witness to the experiences of others. in so doing, we may enter into the experience of another yet we continue to remain grounded in our own bodies and within our own mind. in other words, psychologists can listen with openness yet we can never escape the fact that we hear and process all things interpretatively. interpretation in psychology turning briefly to the literature on psychotherapy, the term “interpretation” is also described as a technique used by the therapist in an effort to extend and deepen understanding. patterson (1974) had this to say about interpretation: clarification responses deal with what is explicitly and implicitly in the client’s behaviour, verbal and/or nonverbal. interpretations go beyond this, involving a contribution by the therapist. in interpretation, the therapist adds to what the client is saying, going beyond the client’s verbalizations and putting in something of his own. (p. 110) porter (1959) also attempted to elucidate this concept of interpretation in psychology. as he explained, therapists move beyond reflecting and towards interpretation when their motivation changes. as porter stated, the difference is not in what the therapist says. the difference is in the therapist’s purpose when he says it….when the therapist utters some words which are a construing of what the client or patient has expressed and it is the therapist’s purpose to be asking of the client or patient whether or not the construction put on the client’s expression was the klingle journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 5 3 meaning intendedthat’s a reflection. when the therapist utters some words which are a construing of what the client or patient has expressed and it is the therapist’s purpose to be informing the patient what meaning his expression holds regardless of his, the patient’s, intended meaningthat’s an interpretation. (p. 57) this distinction between reflexive and interpretive practice seems to highlight the notion that practitioners are deeply intertwined and invested in the therapeutic process their voices, experiences, and perspectives are of value in shaping the therapeutic alliance and the therapeutic journey. the therapist is not simply a parrot tasked with repeating key statements or offering rephrased summaries constructed by the client. nor is the therapist a detached and all-knowing being shrouded behind a screen as in the days of freud. instead, both client and therapist bring forth their experiences, past and present, along with their interpretations of these experiences. in so doing, the interaction is a prosperous one as both parties offer something to the other, and both potentially reap the rewards of such an encounter. histories: owning our suitcase what might the interpretive practice look like in the therapy room? could interpretive practice be as basic as offering the client a metaphor for their experience? i would argue yes, it can be that simple, but like most things in life it can also be far more complex. by offering our interpretation of what the client brings forth, there is the possibility to change, make anew, or shift ever so slightly the client’s way of seeing his or her own experience. yet the interpretive practice of psychology also allows for a rich bi-directional change, wherein the therapist too is transformed as a result of the interaction. this process is layered and somewhat convoluted. as the client interprets his or her experiences through a particular frame of reference (taking into account, either consciously or unconsciously, the historical, social, emotional, cognitive, and cultural contexts), therapists too enter into relationships with a particular frame of reference from which to understand and interpret their own and the clients’ experiences. we create and carry with us our histories, and return to these stories of the past often, perhaps without knowing. put another way, both therapist and client enter to the therapeutic interaction with a metaphorical suitcase full of past “stuff.” for some this stuff may include positive experiences, such as a healthy and happy childhood filled with memories of feeling loved and cared for. yet the suitcase may also be filled with negative stuff, such as past hurts and experiences of abuse. for most of us, the suitcase is filled with both types of experiences the good and the bad, the beautiful and the ugly. with this in mind, psychology, as an interpretive practice, is about recognizing the significance of our suitcase and how the contents of this suitcase shape and influence our interpretations. prejudices: batman for you, batman for me when thinking about how best to illustrate psychology as an interpretive practice, i am reminded of my work with one client, “miles,” a 36 year-old male. miles had a dream of becoming a stand-up comedian and worked hard at this pursuit, often devoting hours to perfecting his craft. klingle journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 5 4 however, he made little in the way of income and was forced to live at home with his parents as a result. early on in our work together, when asked about what he would like to get out of therapy, miles stated, “i want to become my own batman.” batman. bat man. a man who is a bat? a bat who is a man? there is so much in the word and there is so much in the meaning of the word that could be unpacked. dialoguing with a client allows me, the therapist, to do just that. i can not only check for clarification (e.g., asking “batman like the cartoon?”), but i can also deepen and enrich my understanding by asking questions that bring the topic to life such as “what does batman represent to you?”; “what does it mean to become your own batman?”; and “how will you know if and when you have become your own batman?” entangled in all of this, of course, are my own beliefs about and past experience with batman. for me, having been raised by a strong feminist mother, i was always told that i am no different from my male peers. as a result, at the age of seven when springtime approached and my mother needed to purchase new rubber boots for me she bought the boots that were on sale black, matte rubber boots with a batman symbol affixed to the front for all to see. i was mortified. i wanted sickly-sweet bubble gum pink boots with sparkles yet i was stuck with these black batman demon boots. batman, for me, will be forever tied to this experience of wanting to embrace the feminine yet being forced to look like a boy. according to my female peers at the time, batman was stupid and as a result of wearing these batman boots i, too, was stupid. i felt set apart from other girls, flawed, and disgusting. batman represented shame. so, when miles brought up this desire to become his own batman i interpreted it, perhaps without consciously knowing, from a place of past hurt. however, this is not what batman represented for miles, quite the opposite in fact, as i would come to learn in the later sessions. for miles, batman was a symbol of independence; he was a hero, a respected, valued, and contributing member of society. batman was also confident and acted selflessly for the good of others. these were all attributes that miles venerated and sought to embody. because of this experience with miles, i was forced to open up my suitcase, take a critical look, and dig around a little. as a result of our ongoing dialogue about becoming his own batman, miles would open up and unpack his own suitcase, in turn exploring the notion of what it means to be masculine and challenging what he believed to be the dominant discourse of hegemonic masculinity. as it relates to the interpretive practice of psychology, we both came to this therapeutic experience with our own “stuff” and yet we left through the same door, slightly changed, but headed in different directions. to suggest psychology is an interpretive practice is to explicitly bring to light the relevance of the ineradicable, ever-present sticky-fingered maiden. she is such a constant that we may very well forget her presence, similar to the way in which we tune out the nearby conversations in a café or habituate to the smell of coffee as it wafts through the room. while it may be true that she sometimes sit in the corner of the therapy room seemingly inconspicuous, at other times she will be positioned in front of, or in between, the client and therapist ensuring her presence is not overlooked. no matter our acknowledgment, she will persist always and in all ways. klingle journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 5 5 references patterson, c. h. (1974). relationship counseling and psychotherapy. new york, ny: harper & row. porter, e. h. (1959). critical incidents in psychotherapy. englewood cliffs, nj: prentice hall. microsoft word latremouille corrected proof.docx corresponding author: jodi latremouille email: jodilats@gmail.com journal of applied hermeneutics january 24, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 my treasured relation jodi latremouille i have always wanted to write about my cousin shelby, but whenever i try, the words just don’t seem to do justice to my cousin who never grew up. i want to make him live again in this story. but mostly, i would just really like to not cry today. shelby was born to my aunt, with too much life ahead of her, and so he was raised by my silentstoic, gentle grandfather, dave and leona, the asthmatic, arthritic heart-young grandmother, with more love in her than those sick lungs could handle. this little boy was never formally diagnosed, as he never got the opportunity to spend much time in school, but looking back now, i know that he did indeed have certain cognitive delays, which i did not, and still cannot, name. nor do i want to. socially-constructed deficiencies are not lovable. to me, he was just shelby, even though on that level beyond the one that we talk about, we all knew that he didn’t function in quite the same way we all did. shelby was diagnosed with something, though. he was diagnosed with leukemia at the age of five. his childhood years were a blur for all of us. waiting and hoping, trips to vancouver through the fraser canyonand later, over the coquihalla, stays at the ronald mcdonald house, fundraising projects, months in isolation units, missed school, missed life, latremouille journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 2 2 hours and hours stalking and thrashing in the shallow end of the backyard pool: daring us to venture near him. a wheelchair-bound, abbreviated trip to disneyland, make-a-wish dream visits with hulk hogan and trevor linden, birthday pizzas delivered by none other than raphael the teenage mutant ninja turtle, and a failed autologous bone marrow transplant. we were told that shelby was going to receive a “miracle cure,” a treatment that my 11-year-old brain understood in the following terms: the doctors would take a massive needle that would suck the bone marrow from his spine, purge it of cancer cells with radiation, and return it back to his body with another massive needle, with the expectation that the healthy bone marrow would regenerate and grow, filling his spine with healthy bone marrow. my sister and i have always wondered if our matching needle phobias were inspired by bearing witness to our cousin’s medical treatments. i learned the language of platelets and prednisone and blood counts and spinal taps and we-still-have-hope and in/remission/out and chemo and things-are-not-looking good and be-nicer-he’s-sick and making time count. no, wait a minute time counted us by appointments and remissions and birthdays and good days bad days and one more day. we counted everything except time. i now understand this “miracle cure” autologous bone marrow transplant the way the doctors and all the adults in the room did, as what it was in those days, as more of a “last ditch experimental treatment.” shelby spent three months in complete isolation while the bone marrow was being purged of cancer cells. in order to visit him, we had to wash our hands to the elbow with stinging, sharp-smelling disinfectant soap, walk through the sliding door into the closet-sized “isolation chamber,” wash our hands again for several minutes, don plastic shoe coverings, plastic clothing, and face masks, then enter through a second sliding door, careful, fearful, not to get too close. we could touch his hand, but hugs were out of the question. we just couldn’t risk it. he was my alien-cousin, a lovable monster descended from another planet, participating in an experimental study, peering out from behind his oxygen mask. then i would hear his muffled, cheerful gravelly voice, saying “hi, jode!” as if he were just my good old, familiar little earth-cousin. at latremouille journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 2 3 age ten, he was much more subdued, resigned to the treatments, than he had been in the early years. six-year-old tornado. “i am a dinosaur and i am going to smash you!” pierced. “i am a lion and i am going to eat you!” swearing. “shit! i hate you!” despising his cruel saviours. “i am jake the snake and i am going to do a d.d.t. right on your head!” restrained. “i am going to ride my snowmobile all the way back to merritt and you will never find me again!” my sister and i spent many hours with shelby through the years, his contracted playmates, and i think our company probably was one of the reasons my grandmother was able to maintain some semblance of sanity. he was a challenging kid to begin with, prone to temper tantrums and boiling-over fits of anger. and having to be stuck with needles, of varying diameters, on a daily basis, was, and still is, unfathomable to me. anyone who had to go through all of that would, understandably, be just a little “on edge.” my mother would send us over to grandma’s house every day after school until we became too busy with our extracurricular lives; in the later years we would squeeze in weekend sleepovers and pool parties when we could. the two girls would play duck hunter and super mario brothers for hours and hours on end, while shelby wrestled in the background with his stuffed animals and teenage mutant ninja turtle figurines, shouting out the play-by-play, occasionally jumping off the couch and squashing us flat-out under his roly-poly body, making us gasp under his weight, begging to be freed, to breathe again. on the day of my 8th birthday party, all of my friends had come over to celebrate. of course, shelby was invited. it was a glorious spring day at the “fox farm,” our 5-acre mountainside hobby farm, perfect for badminton on the lawn and hikes up the mountain to the magical forest. my father had installed a rope swing in the woods about 200 metres above the house. all of the kids were taking turns. one of the less experienced “city slickers” lost his grip and launched himself into space, then landed softly, unbelievably, gracefully, like a ski-jumper on the steep landing slope, sliding down the leaf-strewn mountainside straight into an anthill. one girl forgot the only safety rule (to launch yourself away from the tree in a circular trajectory), and flew straight out from the tree, then straight back in, smashing into the tree trunk. we watched her float in slow-motion horror, and then cringed in sympathy, shielding our eyes and turning away, wincing at the inevitable “thud.” we turned back and peeled our hands from our eyes to watch her loosen her grip and slither listlessly off the rope into a weeping heap at the base of the tree. only two casualties this time. not bad. shelby was down at the house, as it was too difficult for him to hump all the way up the sidehill to the rope swing. i am pretty sure that what we did that day was my idea. one of us ran down to the house to grab a bottle of ketchup. we chose a “victim,” smeared the ketchup on her, and started hollering. “shelby, help! tracy fell off the rope swing and she’s bleeding!” i heard him, latremouille journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 2 4 out of sight near the house, yelling, “what? oh no! i’m coming, jode!” and we were all snickering and jeering, until we saw him emerge over the hill, panting and crying, wheezing, tripping over sticks, stumbling up, knees dirty, nose running. distraught. our laughter froze instantly to silence. he had brought a tea towel. i didn’t know what he thought he was going to do with that. i guess… i suppose… that was the funny part. it was just a joke. for his 10th birthday, our family bought him a funny little voice-activated yellow plastic sunflower in a funny little plastic green pot that danced a herky-jerky hula, its funny little happy sunglassed face bobbing along to the mini pops singing their funny little-kid version of “karma chameleon.” that flower was cool, man. totally rocked that song. in order to get it into the room we had to unwrap and open up the package, then wipe down every single surface with the disinfectant, including the batteries. the nurses brought it in for him, as that day he was having a “bad immune system day.” we smiled through the window as he tried it out, grinning from cheek to soft, chubby cheek. we could see him laughing through the glass, and in my head i could hear his hoarse, breathless chortle. my mom picked out that flower for him. i am sure she thought it would cheer him up. it did; she nailed it out of the park. he loved that flower. all the days of his life. because you should never grow out of silly little things. shelby finally did make his escape. we were called in to visit him in the hometown merritt hospital. i knew it was bad, because any self-respecting version of hope would have bundled him up in her arms and magically swooped him all the way back up and over the winter-blizzard highway to vancouver children’s hospital. bloated, drained, cushioned by crisp white pillows and our false cheerfulness. distracted by niceties and pain. we, the kids, protected, excluded. unaware but still knowing. just a short visit. tired. ready. calm. barely eleven years old. selfless. raspy. “have fun skiing tomorrow, jode.” big, soft, squishy, forever hug. latremouille journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 2 5 we knew things were bad when we were allowed to hug him. wait, hold it, hold on, for him. cry in the backseat on the way home. look out the foggy window at the hazy, unending night. shelby died on a blowing-snow january night, at the age of 11. i was 12 years old. i got my first menstrual period the day of the funeral. what a day for firsts. i wasn’t particularly afraid or ashamed, as some young girls were back in the days before moms were supposed to be a girl’s best friend and talk about, oh, about just absolutely everything! i had read about it in a book somewhere, and had some “samples” stashed in my bathroom cupboard. i was just, oh, just annoyed, awkward and lonely. i just wasn’t ready to grow up, not just yet. shelby’s neighbour and best friend in the whole entire world, a mature young woman-ish, kind, gentle 12-year old robyn, who didn’t have to be his friend, with two perfect, large fake front teeth that got knocked out years ago in a biking accident riding down “suicide hill” by our neighbourhood school, who felt-penned a massive “hulkamania!” poster for shelby’s best-day-ever and who probably got her period (light-years) months before me, and who i imagined would know exactly how to handle her newfound womanhood gracefully, (she didn’t. she told me so years later.) was beside herself after she returned from viewing his body. his vancouver canucks jerseyed, google-eyeballed disneyland-goofy capped, painless body. “that’s the first time in his life that he has ever been alone.” she wanted to wait with him in that room until the service began. our great-aunt was asked to perform the eulogy, and my narrow little 12-year old self was disappointed in the choice, expecting that she just way too stuffy and stodgy to do my hilarious, ridiculous, lovely little cousin justice. my mom had written the eulogyoh, it was just so perfect and i didn’t want it spoiled by someone who didn’t know him just the way we did. i think back now and realize that my pin-curled aunt was probably the only one in the entire jam-packed room of 300 people who was tightly wound enough to hold it together for the entire speech. latremouille journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 2 6 and she re-called him to a “t”. a “d.d.t.,” that is: “i know that shelby is up there in heaven, riding his snowmobile and doing d.d.t.’s on all the angels.” shelby was the exception. to everything. he was the beautiful little monster who reflected back to us who we really were. we were rude, wild, loud, unfiltered, imaginative, hungry, hurting, scared-cruel dreamers. that is what love does. it makes us want to do justice. without justice we are merely co-existing. waiting for the reward. labelling. judgingand moving on. i will never move on. i want to make him live again. my treasured teacher. my relation. alien-cousin. brother. heart-swelling baby dinosaur. lion. hulk. bio jodi latremouille is a graduate student in the werklund school of education at the university of calgary. she is an entrepreneur and a social studies and literacy teacher. microsoft word editorial.docx corresponding author: dr. n. j. moules faculty of nursing, university of calgary calgary, ab email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics december 10, 2011 the author(s) 2011 editorial on applied hermeneutics and the work of the world nancy j. moules, graham mccaffrey, angela c. morck, & david w. jardine the journal of applied hermeneutics features the work of hermeneutics in its application to the lived realities of our professional and personal lives. as cited in our homepage, at its best, hermeneutics is not about hermeneutics. it is when hermeneutics is actually put to work through the act of interpreting something that its strengths and character appear. our intent is that the journal will offer the opportunity to publish work that reflects the subtlety and suppleness of engaging a topic anew and making it visible in the work of application. we believe that hermeneutics is always at its best when it disappears and living topics show up in all their complexity and ambiguity. hermeneutics, as a philosophy, has been studied and enacted for years from theological, theoretical, methodological, historical, and philosophical lenses. for the past several decades, practices such as nursing, education, social work and psychology, to name a few, have been turning their attention to hermeneutics as a way to explore these complexities. in education, for example, hermeneutics began in earnest with the reconceptualist movement in the early 1970s (e.g. pinar 1975/2000) and the work of maxine greene (e.g. 1971), which went back to the late 1960s. in nursing, in north america, hermeneutics was taken up as a research approach since the 1980s by some beginning thinkers such as allen (1995), benner (1985,1994), chesla (1995), and diekelmann, allen, and tanner (1989), yet threads of hermeneutics have always been situated in nursing thought and practice. engaging hermeneutics as a research approach holds an inherent sensibility with these practice disciplines. nursing, social work, education, and psychology have always been intrinsically interpretive in the nature of their practices. this is not necessarily a methodological claim, but a substantive one. research and practice, at their core are “socially structured, meaning-generating and perspective dependent” pursuits (allen, 1995, p. 181). they share a deep kinship or in other words a “double hermeneutic necessity” (p. 181) that co-exist interdependently. this does not diminish, negate, or limit the need for other methodological considerations. rather, the moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 vol. 1 2 claim of this journal is simple and slightly audacious: whatever methodology we choose or are required to choose to study the ins and outs of our respective professions, our day to day work is itself hermeneutic in character. as practitioners, we are situated in the middle of ongoing and multifarious negotiations of mutual and self-understanding, and understanding is necessarily connected to interpretation (gadamer, 1989). the kinds of discretion that are called forth in our practices are about making sense of particulars, putting them in context, assigning relevance and meaning, and acting on the implications of that meaning. this is an interpretive practice that occurs in a shifting in-between, in the middle of relationships, contexts, and particularities. as such, practitioners are brokers of understanding (moules, 2000). for example, in nursing, there is no such thing as an uninterpreted observation. even the measure of an elevated blood pressure is contextualized. is the patient anxious, in pain, upset? educators, therapists, psychologists, social workers, and nurses innately are always in the process of contextualizing, appreciating that “facts are not separate from the meaning of facts” (walsh, 1996, p. 233). understanding occurs through language and in tradition (walsh, 1996), and practice disciplines have long known this interpretive tradition. “interpretation is an interaction between a historically produced text and a historically produced reader” (allen, 1995, p. 175). nurses, for example, recognize the importance of history how a disease developed, what symptoms came first, and when and they know how to “read” this history into its current context of particularities. hermeneutic understanding enables us both to value history in this complex, clinical sense, and to go further to consider what it might mean to “take” another’s history or to explore what is included or excluded by our histories. educators, too, know that students as well as teachers come to school with complex and mixed personal and family histories and ancestries. more than this, however, the knowledge entrusted to and explored by students and teachers in schools is itself a complex of living ancestries. coming to teach and learn in ways that do justice to these complexities faces students and teachers alike with an ongoing hermeneutic task, or according to kearney, a hermeneutic wager: how to take up the wealth of the world’s knowledge in all of its often contradictory complexity and not betray it with the simplicities of the old, tired industrial model of education. differently put, nursing and education, to use these two sites as examples, are, in their very practices, deeply interpretive disciplines wherein the work of something like hermeneutics is already at work. moreover, both of these disciplines have been faced directly with the co-opting of these interpretive practices by the technologies of medicalization on the one hand and the often-angry vagaries of “tradition education” on the other. therefore, the kinds of knowledge that come from hermeneutic research is knowledge that can be obtained, appreciated, and used by practice professionals, for we can have access to this kind of knowledge, and more importantly, we can know what to do with it, given practice legacies of interpretive wisdom. this coming to know is itself a legacy of practices that must be practiced in order for us to become practiced in them. it is not that these disciplines have decided that hermeneutics is a viable research methodology among others for studying their practices. it is that these disciplines have recognized that their practices are already deeply hermeneutic. the discipline of hermeneutics, with all of its long histories of controversy, contention, imagination, and thought, thus provides these practice disciplines with a form of self-articulation, clarification, and questioning that is already amenable to how such disciplines live and work in moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 vol. 1 3 the world. hermeneutics also provides detailed critiques of the inadequacies of natural science models of thinking and understanding to such lived practices. this recognition of an inner kinship is how “applied” is to be understood in the term “applied hermeneutics” drs. nancy johnston, deborah mcleod, and nancy moules established the canadian hermeneutic institute in 2009, with its inaugural 3-day meeting in halifax, nova scotia, canada. the intent of the institute was to bring together scholars of hermeneutics and hermeneutic research across disciplines in creative dialogue and conversations of philosophy, research, and practice. the first visiting scholar was dr. david jardine, professor in the faculty of education at the university of calgary. in 2010, the institute was hosted in toronto with visiting scholar, dr. john d. caputo, professor of religion emeritus at syracuse university and the david r. cook professor of philosophy emeritus at villanova university. in 2011, dr. richard m. kearney, charles h. seelig chair of philosophy at boston college and visiting professor at university college dublin, was the visiting scholar for the institute held in calgary, alberta. dr. kearney initiated the idea for a journal that could showcase the work he heard from institute participants of bridging philosophy and practice. dr. caputo’s observation, that was mirrored by dr. kearney’s in the following year, was at first a surprise and then a gracious appreciation about how hermeneutics had “found its way” into practice disciplines such as nursing, education, social work, and psychology. they both expressed a profound awareness of the ways we were teaching hermeneutics, how students were taking up the ideas, and how we were using the philosophy of hermeneutics to guide research in our disciplines. dr. kearney suggested the idea of establishing a journal that would demonstrate how hermeneutics does not simply reside in philosophy but can be applied to living aspects of the world in such a way that human conditions and experiences can be understood differently and practice can be changed. as we launch the journal of applied hermeneutics, we proudly offer the first paper as an invited essay on diacritical hermeneutics by dr. richard kearney. in this paper, kearney expands on his project of diacritical hermeneutics that he introduced in strangers, gods and monsters (2003). this is a philosophical paper, and yet it quickly becomes clear that this is a philosophy of care, of urgent concern for questions of how we live in the world as beings of sense and flesh, and how we can search for justice and reconciliation in situations of fear and conflict. dr. kearney’s commitment to addressing these concerns is demonstrated by his involvement in drafting proposals for a northern ireland peace agreement in the 1990s, and more recently in the guestbook project, creating openings for dialogue across historical, cultural, and ideological divides (examples of this work can be found at: http: //www. bc.edu/schools/cas/guestbook). for those of us working in practice disciplines, seeking ways of better understanding what it is we do, and how to fulfill our obligations to those we meet in our work, the dialogue between philosophy and practice can be a powerful source of creative possibility. dr. kearney’s paper presents a valuable resource for our efforts to further the work of applying hermeneutics and stands as an inspiring opening to this new journal. we are delighted to offer this venue of shared and open publication of work that matters and makes a difference. in the complexity of our human lives and relationships, hermes is alive and well. moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 vol. 1 4 authors nancy j. moules, rn, phd, professor, faculty of nursing, university of calgary, achf/achri nursing professorship in child and family centred cancer care, editor, journal of applied hermeneutics graham mccaffrey, rn, doctoral student, faculty of nursing, university of calgary, assistant editor and journal manager, journal of applied hermeneutics angela c. morck, rn, mn, doctoral student, faculty of nursing, university of calgary, assistant editor and journal manager, journal of applied hermeneutics david w. jardine, phd, professor, faculty of education, university of calgary acknowledgements a special thank you to dr. david w. jardine the ultimate teacher of hermeneutics who has shaped so many of our lives, scholarly endeavors, and thinking. thank you to assistant editors and journal managers: graham mccaffrey, rn, doctoral student, faculty of nursing and angela morck, rn, mn, doctoral student, faculty of nursing, university of calgary for actually making this online journal come to life and “work”. also thank you to judy powell, journals manager and project coordinator, and jeff liske, software developer, synergies project, libraries and cultural resources, university of calgary in their guidance about how to do this. references allen, d.g. (1995). hermeneutics: philosophical traditions and nursing practice research. nursing science quarterly, 8(4), 174-182. benner, p. (1985). quality of life: a phenomenological perspective on explanation, prediction and understanding in nursing science. advances in nursing science, 8(1), 1-14. benner, p. (1994). interpretive phenomenology: embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness. thousand oaks, ca: sage. chesla, c.a. (1995). hermeneutic phenomenology: an approach to understanding families. journal of family nursing, 1(1), 68-78. diekelmann, n., allen, d., & tanner, c. (1989). the national league for nursing criteria for appraisal of baccalaureate programs: a critical hermeneutic analysis (pub. no. 15-2253). new york, ny: national league for nursing press. gadamer, h-g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.) (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. greene, m. (1971). curriculum and consciousness. teachers college record, 73(2), 253-270. kearney, r. (2003). strangers, gods and monsters: interpreting otherness. new york, ny: routledge/taylor & francis group. moules, n.j. (2000). nursing on paper: the art and mystery of therapeutic letters in moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2011 vol. 1 5 clinical work with families experiences illness. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. pinar, w. (1975/2000). curriculum theorizing: the reconceptualists. reissued in 2000 as curriculum studies: the reconceptualists. troy, ny: educator’s international press. walsh, k. (1996). philosophical hermeneutics and the project of hans-georg gadamer: implications for nursing research. nursing inquiry, 3(4), 231-237. microsoft word jardine 2015 corrected proof.docx corresponding author: david w. jardine email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics april 23, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 a failed attempt to finish a thought left in mid-air by christopher hitchens david w jardine abstract this paper is a short reflection on the nature of hermeneutics and the strange joy and burden of writing. it focuses on a particular form of hesitancy, telling, and re-telling found in a short video clip featuring christopher hitchens. keywords hermeneutics, writing, christopher hitchens banish all dismay extinguish every sorrow if i'm lost or i'm forgiven the birds will still be singing. from elvis costello (1993), “the birds will still be singing” it is an odd thing when something you read or hear actually haunts you and bids remembering, repeated thought and writing, especially when that thing is precisely about being haunted, in a certain way, about hesitating and staying one’s actions. it is odd to have an idea, an image, an off-hand comment or a hunch stay with you despite its refusal to cede its secrets. this is part of the practice of writing. learning to let stay. it is an urgent patience, a weird joy. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 2 2 the late christopher hitchens is well known enough for me to not pause for long over his work except to say that his adamant critiques of religion (hitchens, 2007) and other forms of totalitarianism were complemented by the work of richard dawkins (2006) and hitchens received, quite near his death, the richard dawkins award at the 2011 texas free thought convention, one of hitchens' final public appearances. from that appearance: christopher hitchens: some of you know, i suppose you all know now, that the words of one of my favorite poets ernest dowson are quite often with me. dowson stole them actually from the roman poet horace: non sum qualis eram, “i am not as i was.” . . . . in the meantime, we have the same job we've always had. there are no final solutions. there is no absolute truth. there is no supreme leader. there is no totalitarian solution that says “if you would just give up your freedom of inquiry, if you would simply abandon your critical faculties, a world of idiotic bliss can be yours.” you will certainly lose the faculties, and you may not know as a result, that idiotic bliss is even more idiotic than it looks. but we have to begin by repudiating all such claims. grand rabbis, chief ayatollahs, infallible popes, the peddlers of surrogate and mutant quasi-political religion and worship-the dear leader, the great leader, we have no need of any of this. and looking at them, and their record, and the pathos of their supporters, i realize that it is they who are the grand imposters, and my own imposture this evening was mild by comparison. (godlessuk, 2013) the reason i mention the connection to richard dawkins in particular is because of what i find to be a still-amazing youtube video clip of hitchens and douglas james wilson (objectivebob, 2010). reverend wilson is the pastor at christ church in moscow, idaho, and has had many intense and easily accessible public debates and talking-head news encounters with hitchens. this clip is the final moments of a 2009 documentary collision: christopher hitchens, vs. douglas wilson (documentaryondemand, 2013). wilson and hitchens appear to be in the back seat of a car and hitchens mentions how those (like himself) arguing against the divine design of things still take seriously the hairsbreadth of (what he understands to be) happenstance of “the goldilocks effect,” of the earth being just right in its relation to the sun and its sustenance: “you have to spend time thinking about it, working on it. it’s not a trivial [thing]” (objectivebob, 2010). hitchens refers to having had a particular conversation with richard dawkins. then this: christopher hitchens: . . . and then at one point. i think this is not on camera, i said, if i could covert every one in the world -not convert, if i could convince -to be a nonbeliever, and i’d really done brilliantly, and there's only one left. one more and then it would be done. there’d be no more religion in the world. no more deism, theism. [pause]. i wouldn’t do it. [pause]. and dawkins said, “what do you mean you wouldn't do it?” i said, “i don’t quite know why i wouldn’t do it.” and it’s not just because there’d be nothing left to argue and no one left to argue with. not just that. though it would be that. somehow, if i could drive it out of the world, i wouldn’t. and the incredulity with jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 2 3 which he [dawkins] looked at me stays with me still. i’ve got to say. (objectivebob, 2010) as with dawkins’ look of incredulity, this clip now stays with me. thoughts first about the aesthetic “punch” that we often feel when we read or hear something: the word for perception or sensation in greek was aesthesis, which means at root a breathing in or taking in of the world, the gasp, “aha,” the “uh” of the breath in wonder, shock, amazement, and aesthetic response. (hillman, 2006, p. 36) tersely put, this is the reason for all those drudgery pages in hans-georg gadamer’s truth and method (1989, pp. 42-100) and his attempts to rescue this phenomenon of aesthetic address (p. 299) from its tragic subjectivization and marginalization in our understanding of the experience of truth. this video hits me still, and when i quickly re-created hitchens’ words for my son over the holidays just passed, all he said was “yep.” me too. i wouldn't do it. and “it would not deserve the interest [i] take in it if it did not have something to teach [me] that [i] could not know by [my]sel[f]” (gadamer, 1989, p. xxxv). but at first (and still), i just suspected this might be so, and hitchens did, too, in a way. he himself remembered and retold this story and told it, as you can see in the video, with the sly grin of suspecting there’s something to it a kind of coyote grin, a bit self-satisfied, a bit expectant, a bit joyous. were it just a subjective incident with no loft or pitch to it beyond “moist gastric intimacy” (sartre, 1970, p. 4), re-telling it seems very odd sheer self-indulgence and entertainment. on the face of it at least, this is “not just that.” why do we re-tell? trying, perhaps, to work it out or, better, to see if something works out if you work it a bit: “something awakens our interest" (gadamer, 2001, p. 50). “something is going on, (im spiele ist), something is happening (sich abspielt)" (gadamer, 1989, p. 104). a clue, then, to gadamer's (1989, pp. 101-134) deep interest in (what is at) play (spiel) (and, i guess, in my interest in that hitchens video). something is going on. i suspect. so then the risk you run as a writer: maybe not, but only staying put will prove the case for good or ill. then there is that sort-of hoarder/gatherer/rummager thing that writers do --me, with this clip, saving it, transcribing it, wanting to remember it, telling people about it. there is something here that i need to keep with me, something of the way this idea hangs in the air, somehow, and then, too, of what this hesitation means. lord knows i’ve tried: compassion? sympathy? extinction? like saving a rare bird? knowing that if no one now believes these religious texts they quote, if no one adores these images and ideas, then something is perhaps irretrievably lost? loss of “the other” as a loss of oneself? levinas and the horror of facing the last face? pity? that it jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 2 4 would say something too much, too unbearable of me should i proceed? what about the secondlast believer? bluntly put, yuck to all this. and hence the irony, that many drafts of writing have been deleted and these deletions seem to have simply increased the glowing attraction of this clip. “[it] compels over and over, and the better one knows it, the more compelling it is. this is not a matter of mastering an area of study” (gadamer, 2007, p. 115). this is why, as a writer, i have repeatedly found that it is not just a matter of paying patient attention to the world --to little happenings-by like this clip -but doing so as if i will be answerable in writing to such things as arrive in (and, i must say, in part because of) such patient attending. that prospect --of being answerable in writing --intensifies attention in a most delicious way. and then comes the odd hermeneutic fidelity of trying to not betray this hovering linger of words and images and appeal and grins, but trying to keep it safe, trying to let it stand in itself, in its own repose. and then that impossible task, of trying to write so that the linger itself will be a bit legible in what i then write. the task of hermeneutic writing is to not fall for the falsehood that this lingering is an error that writing might fix. it is, rather, a truth that unfixes writing, makes it loft and swerve and exaggerate unpinned. this, of course, is why hermeneutic research is always prone to the writer's indulgences. the aim of writing is not giving myself free rein (latin indulgere) but giving this free rein by finding what of this can be eked out in words: “i wouldn’t do it.” “what do you mean you wouldn't do it?” i don't know what i mean. maybe that just attests to the deeply buried hermeneutic assertion, that its work is not about what people or texts or things or signs mean, but about what might happen if they were true. “it is only when the attempt to accept what is said as true fails that we try to “understand" the text . . . as another’s opinion” (gadamer, 1989, p. 294). “a text is not understood as a mere expression of life but is taken seriously in its claim to truth” (gadamer, 1989, p. 297). in remembering, repeating, and caring for this chance little clip, it serves as a sort of sentinel waiting for an arrival that would bespeak its good sense. it is as if this tale itself provides a way to remain alert to the day-to-day events that come and go, as if it is waiting for its own reprieve, waiting to be called for, waiting to be recognized by some kin of the world-the off-hand event or bit of reading or news story or gesture of a child in a grade one class, that will summon it, finally, to be what it is. i'm waiting for it to lift off my shoulders in a flight of its own, this sorrow. told and retold in almost ritual repetitions, worrying over bones or the great and ancient monastic murmuring of texts out loud and under the breath, seeking the truth of what it repeats, seeks its redemption in words. monkish practices of scholarship. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 2 5 telling and re-telling are attempts to let it find its freedom from my own obsessive remembering of it within the confines of a life whose imposture is both too great and too small by itself to think this through. writing this aims to free me from it and to free it from me. “the aim of interpretation, it could be said, is not just another interpretation but human freedom” (smith, 1999, p. 29). to face these fleeting things and try to entail them with the right attention, the right affection, with a devotion that is not about deepening the attachments of believing (the first steps towards totalitarian solutions [see jardine, 2015]) but the wonder that just might turn attachment into love. the staying of hitchens’ words in the face the last person to be convinced is the same stay as the pleasure over not quite knowing why. however, i don’t quite know why. references costello, e. (1993). the birds will still be singing. from e. costello, the juliet letters. warner brothers cd #45180. lyrics by e. costello, copyright plangent visions music inc. dawkins, r. (2006). the god delusion. boston, ma: houghton mifflin. documentaryondemand (2013, april 20). colisao: ateu x pastor [video file]. (this is a subtitled version of collision: christopher hitchens, vs. douglas wilson. level4 studio, phoenix az. director: darren doane, october 27, 2009, asin: b002m3shto). retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jwysecocc8. gadamer, h-g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev.ed, j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum books. gadamer, h-g. (2001). gadamer in conversation: reflections and commentary (r. palmer, ed. & trans.) new haven, ct: yale university press. gadamer, h-g. (2007). from word to concept: the task of hermeneutics as philosophy. in r. palmer (ed. & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 108-122). evanston, il: northwestern university press. godless uk (2013, june 30). christopher hitchens last public appearance dawkins award [video file dated october 8th 2011]. retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud973couvys. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 2 6 hillman, j. (2006). anima mundi: returning the soul to the world. in j. hillman, city and soul (pp. 27-49). putnam, ct: spring publications. hitchens, c. (2007). god is not great: how religion poisons everything, new york, ny: twelve books. jardine, d. (2015). an ode to xmas present. on-line: https://www.academia.edu/10101433/an_ode_to_xmas_present. objectivebob (2010, july 5). christopher hitchens makes a shocking confession [video file]. retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9tmwfkdwiy. sartre, j.p. (1970). intentionality: a fundamental idea in husserl's phenomenology. journal for the british society for phenomenology, 1(2), 3-5. smith, d.g. (1999). pedagon: interdisciplinary essays on pedagogy and culture. new york, ny: peter lang. microsoft word venturato final pdf.docx corresponding author: lorraine venturato, phd university of calgary email: lventura@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics december 24, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 towards a hermeneutics on ageing: or what gadamer can teach us about growing old lorraine venturato abstract ageing is one of life’s most pervasive shared experiences, and one that is imbued with social, cultural and bio-medical meaning. this paper begins a conversation on what hermeneutics and, in particular the philosophical hermeneutics of gadamer, can add to contemporary understandings of ageing. keywords ageing, hermeneutics, hans-georg gadamer it was the war in the pacific. silk stockings and a pink slip. a quick shimmy down a drainpipe in the middle of the night. she had seemed so old at 92. shrunken. somehow faded and less 60 years evaporated in a heartbeat and there she was. i saw her – finally. shining. somehow so much more ageing is one of life’s most pervasive shared experiences. from the moments we draw our first breath until we breathe our last however long that may be life is essentially a process of venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 2 ageing. indeed the etymology of age/ageing derives from the latin aetatem (nominative aetas) meaning a period of life, lifetime, or years. the association of ageing with old age, in particular, dates back to the 14th century (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ageing) though the term “old age” was not commonly used until the 1900s, with a sharp increase in usage post 1950. as such, the meaning of the word “ageing” has both ancient and contemporary roots. ageing is defined as an organic process of growing older over a period of time, and is akin to maturation or ripeness, a process of becoming old. legouès (in malabou, 2012) compared life to an aeroplane flight with take-off equating to childhood and youth, cruising with adulthood, and descent with ageing. it is also defined as the acquisition of desirable qualities through being left undisturbed for a period of time, as in the ageing of a fine wine or cheese (http:// www.finedictionary.com/ageing.html). however, there is also an association between the idea of ageing and decline of fading or weathering and the physical changes and appearance of old age that represent a palpable manifestation of the passage of time. i suggest that, in contemporary developed nations, this is the pervasive definition of the term “ageing.” over the years of working with older people and researching in the field of ageing, i have been exposed to many understandings of ageing some have required active interpretation, and others have been embedded in the takenfor-granted. ageing has many guises and is understood in a variety of ways. we are aware of chronological ageing as each year ticks by. this gives us a number that can indicate how long we have been caught up in the act of living. as a health care professional, i draw on an understanding of ageing that is biological and bio-medically framed – healthy ageing, normal ageing, and pathological ageing and a myriad of theories that seek to explain the degradation of cells and the wearing out of body systems over time, all of which inform my understanding of a physiological process of ageing as degradation and progression towards death. there are also social and cultural constructions of ageing ways in which ageing has become associated with wisdom and emancipation, as well as cognitive decline, frailty and illness, and death. there are critiques of social norms that drive youth-orientation (apparently its all elvis’s fault) and its resultant impact on ageing and older people; and “grey power” movements that seek to re-associate ageing with wisdom and challenge the negative social commentaries that position older people as vulnerable and a burden on society. these interpretations of ageing serve to shape our social and individual understanding of ageing. in this paper, i present my efforts to begin drawing together an understanding of ageing and old age, informed by the philosophical hermeneutics of hans-georg gadamer (1900 – 2002). in their book on gadamerian hermeneutic research, moules, mccaffrey, field, and laing (2015, p. 202) noted, “hermeneutic questions are hard questions; hermeneutic understanding is hard understanding.” accordingly, my efforts to develop a hermeneutic understanding of ageing is challenging in many ways. first, my understanding of ageing is shaped by social and biomedical interpretations. my education and professional socialisation deeply ingrains and privileges certain interpretations of ageing over others. this is an important acknowledgement in developing an understanding of ageing. for gadamer, any prior understanding of a topic, and the prejudices that we bring to a topic, venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 3 always inform our current interpretation and consequent understanding of it (gadamer, 1960/1989). as with “ageing,” the word “prejudice” is imbued with negative meanings in contemporary english usage. however, prejudice requires acknowledgement that we do not approach any topic as though it were a blank slate; rather, we approach a topic that is already saturated with meaning (moules et al., 2015). the challenge in this lies in the fact that many prejudices lie hidden in the everyday and taken-for-granted. as a health care professional in the area of gerontology, the topic of ageing is saturated with meaning, and a form of scientific political correctness that begs a counter to social and cultural discourses that still shape my understandings. so, while i have professional discourses and meanings that sit within my discipline and education, i am also aware of and subject to, at a more personal level, socially and culturally derived meanings that shape my personal experience of the phenomena of ageing. to step outside these interpretive limitations and be open to other understandings requires an openness to the other (gadamer, 1960/1989). davey (2006, p. xvi) noted, “openness to the other requires a particular refinement: the skill of being critically distant while remaining involved, attentive, and caring.” a second challenge in developing a hermeneutics of ageing lies in gadamer’s assertion that there can be no final word in hermeneutics and, therefore, no first word in hermeneutic understanding. rather, gadamer defined understanding as a relationship and as a dialogue (grondin, 1994), less like grasping content and more like a continuous dialogue. in this respect, a hermeneutics of ageing both arises from and informs the dialogue on ageing, while claiming to be neither the first, nor final word. the meaning of ageing will continue to evolve, and grasping for such an elusive meaning may be deemed self-indulgent at best. a third and final challenge stems from the primacy of the biomedical paradigm, which not only privileges certain lenses and interpretations of the topic of ageing, but also serves to limit our understanding of it. more concerning still is that such a dominant paradigm in ageing is selflimiting because it also constrains the possibilities for questions we might ask. for me, this has been a defining feature of this movement towards a hermeneutic of ageing, which started with a discussion with a colleague. in considering submitting an abstract for a presentation at the north american society for philosophical hermeneutics (nasph) 2015 conference, i commented to my colleague that i had nothing to present. her rather off-the-cuff response to “write a hermeneutics of ageing” left me reeling. it was the suddenness of the recognition that, in all my many understandings of ageing and despite having a research chair in gerontology and considering myself a hermeneut at heart, i had never considered how a hermeneutics of ageing might add to the dialogue and understanding of the topic. it was, as gadamer wrote, a call to action. gadamer (1960/1989. p. 299) also wrote “understanding begins when something addresses us.” my professional understanding of ageing began when i was a student nurse working in a nursing home in australia. (i use the term “professional understanding” here as, like most people, i had a concept of ageing that was socially and culturally derived, and that i brought with me into my professional role). the poem at the beginning of this paper is based on my journal notes following an evening shift where i spent time talking to mary, a frail 92-year woman. in hindsight, the moment marked a shift; it was a profound “aha” moment that re-charted my professional course. i realised that mary was more than the sum of her wrinkles, her pains, and her considerable venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 4 medications and, despite the ravages of time evident in faces and bodies, despite a range of illnesses and medical woes – all of which are fascinating to a nursing student – the person inside is always present and does not necessarily experience the ravages of time at the same rate and in the same way as the physical body. this was also the first time i saw mary as less “other,” and became aware of our similarities. until then, i had been lulled by the outward signs of her age into thinking of her as somehow intrinsically different to me. today, this has particular implications for my professional focus on the concepts of personhood and selfhood as they pertain to older people living with dementia and other forms of cognitive impairment. it also reflects what davey (2006, p. 117) referred to as “the hermeneutic experience of being addressed,” which includes a recognition that we are not as well acquainted with our topic as we assumed, and then forging ahead with a new apprehension. mary shared with me a story about an evening during the second world war. her story jolted me in much the same way my colleague’s remark about a hermeneutics of ageing jolted me years later. i remember thinking, how did i not “see” this before. it changed my understanding of ageing in a profound way and started a professional interest that continues today. davey (2006, p. 118) referred to this as a “phenomenological shift from absentmindedness to mindfulness” that occurs “when what we have unknowingly experienced as the everyday is transformed.” according to gadamer (cited in davey, 2006, p. 118), this transformation is associated with the greek goddess mnemosyne. he wrote “mnemosyne rules everything: to keep in memory means to be human.” mnemosyne was also the mother of the nine muses, who inspire and nurture creativity through the arts and aesthetic endeavours. gadamer’s reflections in this area stimulates thought in relation to the nature of understanding ageing, and concepts of self and personhood for older people with dementia, and offer insight into how our memories and our sense of the world or our ability to interpret and make sense of the world through our senses, as grondin (2015) stated – appears to be both diminished and intact in someone with dementia. while i may take some issue with gadamer’s statement that memory equates in some way to humanness, his work on aesthetics and understanding and his invocation of mnemosyne, have shaped my work with older people with dementia through creative attempts to generate meaning and understanding. this is probably most evident through a mixed research and creative arts project that occurred in australia in 2013/2014 (venturato, 2015). we used an interpretive photographic approach to understand the world of older people with dementia living in a nursing home. our project entailed collaborative work between two photo-documentarists, ten older people with dementia living in two nursing homes, and myself. this work culminated with a public exhibition and public forum, where a panel of “experts” discussed ideas of creativity and ageing. the work highlighted a number of aspects of living with dementia and served to open dialogue with families, staff, and management. it became evident that older people with dementia maintained capacity to interpret and generate meaning in their life in various ways and that memory, interpretation, and meaning were much more complex than the results of an mri scan or a mini mental assessment score. as a researcher, it was satisfying to witness “aha” moments in nursing home staff as they reconsidered what they knew about the residents in the project, and older people with dementia in general. perhaps more satisfying, was witnessing our participants fully addressed as whole venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 5 people, beyond the constraints of medicalised diagnoses and perceived limitations. davey (2013, p. 68) noted that gadamer recognises the ability of art to address those concerns that “define us as human beings” and to “transform our understanding of them.” indeed, art’s compelling power lies in its ability to clarify aspects of our everyday concerns which, without its intervention, would remain unresolved. unlike life, art offers meanings ‘with nothing out of place’. it is precisely because of the compelling interests which shape our human horizon that we are susceptible to art’s claim. (davey, 2013, p. 68) moules et al. (2015) offered an important insight into the way gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics can guide further understanding of ageing through offering a number of guidelines for hermeneutic practice. in the spirit of gadamer’s reluctance to provide a methodology for hermeneutics, the authors are careful to note that such guidelines do not represent an attempt at methodological imperatives or a final word on the practice of understanding through hermeneutic explanation. rather they offer a guide to practically derive interpretations, while maintaining a philosophical orientation towards the phenomena of interest. the first guideline offered by moules et al. (2015) encourages a focus on phenomena rather than method. thus, coming to a hermeneutics of ageing requires one to go beyond method, and to be more concerned with substance than procedure. this is not to say that anything goes, but that interpretation is framed around careful attention, creative construction of possibilities, and grounded in experience. the second guideline refers to the requirement for a disciplined focus on the phenomenon (the particular) (moules et al., 2015). we are addressed by something, and by something that is significant. this is a complex process whereby understanding is fuelled by the particular and conversely, the particular is fuelled by new understanding. they noted “it is the detailed familiarity of the cases that strikes us; it is the detailed strangeness of the case that surprises us” (moules et al., 2015, p. 64). this requirement for a disciplined focus on the phenomenon also entails a temporal dimension. a hermeneutics of ageing considers the past, present, and future in order to re-envision ageing in a way that is both familiar and new. the third guideline requires vigilance and openness in our encounters with phenomena. within this, there is recognition of the risk inherent in being open to the other, in being flexible, in opening our prejudices and pre-understandings and our assumptions to change. this requires vigilance and constant attention in developing openness. such openness requires practice and this is particularly essential when one is embedded in knowing the phenomenon and in particular, when situated as an “expert” in the phenomenon. rather, remaining open lies in positioning oneself as a learner, embedded in a continual process of curiosity and truth seeking. the fourth guideline encourages us to read the self and the world differently. in this respect, they urge us to read slowly and methodically, to read for possibilities, and to allow the phenomenon to open up. this is reading in a transformative sense, rather than the digestion and interpretation of meaning and intent learnt in the traditional or technical sense of reading. thus a hermeneutics of ageing would consider the prejudices or pre-understandings, our perceptions, and the contexts that shape our perceptions and seek to transform understanding through the interplay between venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 6 text, self, and world a fusion of horizons that supports the movement and expansion of understanding in light of its encounter with history and tradition (recognises the present through the past) and dialogue. the fifth and final guideline recognises hermeneutic practice as dialogical. in this respect, hermeneutics entails entering into a dialogical relationship that recognises, and is open to, the possibility that the other may be right. it maintains a continual movement between question and answer and recognises that such conversations are ongoing. in this respect, a hermeneutics on ageing does not seek to have the final word on ageing but to contribute to the on-going conversation. there are many other aspects of gadamer’s work that offer insights into understanding ageing; in particular, aletheia and bildung offer insights into new possibilities for thinking about ageing. as moules et al. (2015) suggested, the process of hermeneutic understanding requires patience and flexibility; it is slow, methodical, and continuously open to new possibilities. this work represents this first step into the development of a hermeneutics of ageing, as a counterweight to social and biomedical understandings. references ageing. (n.d). fine dictionary. retrieved from (http://www.finedictionary.com/ageing.html) may 31, 2015. ageing. (n.d). dictionary.com. retrieved from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ageing may 31, 2015. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: state university of new york press. davey, n. (2013). unfinished worlds: hermeneutics, aesthetics and gadamer. edinburgh, scotland: edinburgh university press. gadamer, h.g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev.ed., j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.) new york, ny: continuum. grondin, j. (1994). introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. new haven, ct: yale university press. grondin, j. (2015). keynote presentation at the canadian hermeneutic institute. may 20-22, 2015. halifax, ns, canada. malibou, c. (2012). ontology of the accident: an essay in destructive plasticity (c. shread, trans.). cambridge, uk, polity press. venturato journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 9 7 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. venturato. l. (2015, in press). nurturing creativity and understanding in the care of frail older people. the arts collective. accepted for publication january 2015. microsoft word williamson editorial .docx corresponding author: w. john williamson, phd email: john.williamson@cssd.ab.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 11, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 guest editorial: preface to “a strange and earnest client” part one of the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery w. john williamson, phd ladies and gentlemen, the story you are about to see is true. the names have been changed to protect the innocent (mytvmemories, 2012). this phrase, so familiar it long ago lapsed into cliché and parody, announced the beginning of every episode of the long-running, and decidedly un-ironic, police procedural television series dragnet. i revive it now, in its original earnestness to maintain that the story that i am introducing in this editorial is true as well. the story is part one of a serialized publication of my phd thesis a hermeneutic exploration of the educational category of slow learner written as a hardboiled detective novel in the style of raymond chandler (1888-1959). it is essentially a fictionalized and stylized narrative of my ongoing journey (through research and direct experience) into special education thought and practice as it pertains to students named “slow learners” and, more broadly at times, to educational classification and sorting. if the story has “worked,” the narrative should largely imply some justification for this approach. in this editorial, i articulate why i chose to present hermeneutic phenomenological research in this way. in my candidacy exam, i was asked about the hermeneutic warrant for presenting research in this way and my response, after invaluable participation and augmentation from my doctoral supervisor dr. jim field as a co-author, was published as a paper in this journal (williamson & field, 2014). this was a fruitful exercise as it helped me develop the set of hermeneutic principles that i tried to follow in composing the story as well as yielding several insights that made their way into the final novelization in fictionalized form. i return to some of the themes to offer the main hermeneutic warrant for this form of presentation in a piece of writing that stands alone as an introduction to part one of the novelization. it is also an opportunity to reflect back on the hermeneutic warrant for the piece as a completed work, a vantage only available upon completion. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 2 speculation in the williamson and field original paper, it was discussed how, while often imbued with artistic truth, fictional writing obviously surrenders some amount of what might be considered truth as correspondence. what is gained in this surrender is an abundance of speculation, an essential and life-giving characteristic of all acts of communication (gadamer, 2004, p. 452) as well as those of imagination (gough, 2008, p. 338). speculative flights of fancy help us see and understand differently and they occasion discoveries. speculation has been responsible for philosophical thought experiments that have helped us re-examine our behaviour and moral intuitions. singer (2009), for example, speculatively equated the reluctance of many in the developed world to do very much to help starving populations on the other side of the world with an urban citizen who encounters a child drowning in a shallow pond and willingly ruins a new pair of shoes to wade in and save the child. in doing so, he asks why if we would readily sacrifice the value of a pair of shoes to save a life in this situation, so few of us contribute this same monetary amount that we would spend on a new pair of shoes (which he calculates could go a long way in providing for an impoverished child) to eradicate the epidemic of extreme poverty across the world (pp. 1-5). mary shelley, in a query that continues to haunt bioethical reckoning, wondered what the consequences would be if a brilliant scientist usurped the power of creation (srour, 2008). beyond these tests of moral principles, einstein, as a generative scientist wondered impossibly if he could chase a light beam at the speed of light in a vacuum, whether the light would appear still or oscillating to him, and in this thought experiment found “the germ of the special relativity theory” (norton, 2004). in this particular circumstance, the issue in need of re-imagining is primarily a moral one. it involves a psychological category of students who cognitive tests (that the education system endorse as sacrosanct) evaluate as below average in full-scale intelligence and in need of additional support to succeed in school. despite this evaluation, slow learners are a group of students for whom the education system in alberta has ironically failed to provide any of the funding and support it offers other categories of students said to have exceptional needs. it is true that a special education/inclusive education system that claims to support students in reaching their full potential, but that often results in social exclusion and negative self-fulfilling prophesies has been often been a topic of more (ostensively) traditional academic research (e.g., armstrong, 2012; couture, 2012; gilham, 2013; graham & slee, 2008). though roughly conforming to expectations of standard academic formatting, much of this work is troubling, insightful, and highly original and i found several texts about the excesses and deficiencies of special education/inclusive education systems indispensable to my project. when it came to my particular topic, and my unique relationship to it, however, it was felt that much more could be “unconcealed” (heidegger, 1962, p. 147) via an additional speculative turn. as framed in the previous paper, this speculation was “what would happen if we perceived and treated mysterious gaps in programming for students the same way we treat hard-boiled mysteries involving crimes such as homicide, or in this particular case, missing persons?” what understandings might this occasion?” (williamson & field, 2014, p.15). williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 3 mysteries, hermeneutic and hard-boiled the concept of mystery is integral to this speculation, and is, indeed frequently discussed in hermeneutic philosophy (e.g., caputo, 1987; davey, 2006; gadamer, 2004). mystery, a word that means and/or has meant, “religious truth via divine revelation, hidden spiritual significance, mystical truth, secret rites, secret worship, to close or shut, a trade or craft, a secret or hidden thing, and most recently, a detective story,” (harper, 2001) fits very naturally into the philosophy of interpretation, the philosophy devoted to the humble and reverent study of the endless interpretability of the life-world. “mystery” is a rejoinder of the tendency toward positivism in the human/psychological/social sciences, a way of thinking that finds certainty in its knowledge claims through the reduction of the contamination of human complexity and through the disavowal of any kinship between the researcher and the studied (jardine, 1998). it is this positivism that can turn a concept like slow learner, arguably a useful tentative description of a certain style of academic struggle potentially leading to a set of assistive possibilities to explore in practice into a categorical enclosure that entraps student, his or her school career, and the staff that work with this student (mehan, herweck, & meihls, 1986). remarking on the difference between the interpretive and positivistic way of thinking, ricoeur scholar, blundel (2010), has noted a problem can be laid in front of me and examined at my leisure. a mystery on the other hand is something in which i am unavoidably implicated. it is not laid out in front of me but rather encompasses me in such a way that i find myself inside of it. (p. 60) this novelization also sought to integrate the philosophy of the hard-boiled detective with a hermeneutic appreciation of mystery. this is not a difficult integration as the concept of “hardboiled” functions not so much as an addition to hermeneutic thought, but more as a tool with which to affect a slight dusting off of hermeneutics to reveal something that was elemental all along. hard-boiled detective took a genre that had previously been characterized by quaint, though often well crafted, puzzle games that did little to speak to the deeper human experience or challenge the existing social order (williamson & field, 2014), and adjusted its outlook to reveal corruption, inequity, moral complexity, and something dark, tragic, and ultimately unknowable beneath all the provisional case resolutions. similarly, as caputo (1987) has reminded us, the function of hermeneutics is not to make our problems easier to deal with, like a benign and forgettable detective story might distract us from the worries of the day or like the reduction of teaching to a few sterilely understood techniques might distract us from pondering our awesome responsibilities as educators, but to “offer a reading of life…that restores life to its original difficulty” (p.1). beyond those which i that have already described, we will leave the reader to discover which hard-boiled difficulties related to this topic that the work unconceals. one thing i can reveal without spoiling any of the surprises, however, is something unexpected, and hard-boiled, that happened to me after i completed the work. i had during most of the writing held my topic, the category of “slow learner” in some ambivalence, thinking that even as it did not provide access to formal services, and even as it did sometimes result in self-fulfilling prophesies, that it at least pointed concerned educators in the direction of some students who needed support. but during my oral examination i was asked if the category “slow learner” held any continuing relevance in conversations about supporting students, inclusively, in alberta’s schools. before i knew it, i williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 4 heard myself saying “no” and then providing an explanation that i do not remember the details of but that an exam committee member told me basically suggested i’d like to see the category “blown up/destroyed.” like the leaps that detectives make, how and when i came to this intuition is still a mystery to me. while i had thought that during this journey i might discover many things to confirm my ambivalence about the label, i could not have predicted that, in the words of gadamer (2004), beyond my “wanting and doing” (p. xxvi), this work would lead me to this realization. i remain curious if readers will feel similarly. this hard-boiled intuition certainly has not made life any easier for me, as i continue to witness this label function as a currency in schools. a note on rigor researchers considering non-traditional approaches to presenting applied hermeneutic phenomenological research may be interested to note that, at least in my case, the approach called us toward rigor instead of away from it. a part of this was simply the pragmatic urgency to fight the inevitable perception that a member of the supervisory committee expressed memorably and candidly when he warned that readers might develop the prejudice that this “was just screwing around with a detective story.” beyond this, however, the two masters of hermeneutics and hardboiled mystery writing constantly pulled me in the direction of finding more difficulty, more messiness, and more uneasy interpretability in “the case of the appearing/disappearing slow learner.” from january of 2011 when i first arrived at the idea of approaching the research this way to april of 2015 when it was submitted, i researched, wrote, and rewrote this novelization in daily writing sessions, often experienced as grueling. in terms of sources, hard-boiled hermeneutics pushed me to interview eight teachers, administrators, or curriculum leaders, and twice interview a small class of four students who were labelled as slow learners. i drew on 18 years of experiential data as a teacher as well as experiential data from being a student with a learning disability and parent of a child with a disability. i studied disability history going back to medieval times, 100 years of programing for slow learners in alberta, and the most current (at the time) educational reforms in alberta and their relationship to slow learners and inclusive education. i reviewed and interpreted depictions of slow learners in popular media including the films forrest gump, and being there, and the novel lottery and read all the primary texts (alberta education documents, manuals for teachers, psychology texts) i could access about the supposed characteristics and needs of slow learners as well as related disabilities including learning disabilities and intellectual disabilities. heidegger (1962) and gadamer (2004) have both reminded us that a complete view of any scene is never possible, in part because different vantages unconceal different phenomenon, but i would like to think that at least from the vantages this particular approach provided that i, like the gumshoes in the novels that inspired me, left relatively few stones unturned. how the novelization works the narrative strategy used to present the research in this novelization involves depicting a version of myself, exploring my true concerns with exaggerated angst, in the role of a special education coordinator who hires a detective to find this category of students that the narrative claims have been lost. i explored my more critical side through the character of the incredulous detective, who plays the role of the provocateur, making observations and asking questions about williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 5 educational categorization, disability, and bureaucratic process. additional characters include informants to my research, whose names, indeed, have been changed, even as i tried to faithfully represent their actual beliefs about, and roles in, the educational drama of slow learners. it is with less verisimilitude that i, under their real names, people the story with various writers and thinkers who have guided my quest. by and large, the thoughts they express on this topic are my own hermeneutic appropriations – applications of their philosophy to topics they did not have opportunity to comment on more directly. additional characters include villainous personifications of the toxic institutional discourses and practices that i claim have led to the disappearance of slow learners. as mentioned, the story is written to, as closely as possible, resemble a hard-boiled detective fiction novel. to preserve narrative flow, there is an avoidance of parenthetical references, instead opting for footnoting to acknowledge the intellectual property of sources, demonstrate the robustness of the research, and, occasionally, to provide more elaboration on a particular theme than the action of the narrative would allow. whether the reader approaches these footnotes as a part of the first reading of the narrative, or reviews them later, i hope that they provide adequate conversation of the research that guided the interpretations of the larger narrative. publication and serialization when i began to explore the possibilities for finding an appropriate publisher for my work, the journal of applied hermeneutics stood out to me because of its history of publishing eclectic and often provocative hermeneutic scholarship. since its inaugural issue in 2011, this journal has provided readers the opportunity to engage with the theorizing of esteemed hermeneutic philosophers such as richard kearney and nicholas davey, leaders in the enterprise of bringing the wisdom of hermeneutics into professional practice such as david jardine and nancy moules, and a very wide range of intriguing applications of hermeneutics (for e.g., discourses of dementia, hermeneutic understandings of oncology, the value of specialized summer camps for children with cancer, genuine school inclusion of students with diagnosed behavioral disabilities, first nations education, and applications of buddhism to nursing). feeling that it might be overwhelming to the reader to open and engage with an entire novel, replete with academic footnotes, all at once, especially considering that readers often engage with digital copies of the journal’s articles, i considered the possibility of releasing it in several editions. i have always been intrigued with the victorian tradition of serialized novels and how it mirrored my own experiences as a child (before technologies allowed for binge watching) awaiting new episodes of my favourite television shows, particularly the “cliff hangers” that usually marked the end of one season and the painful wait for the next. i have also had similar feelings awaiting new releases of my favourite film franchises, and, returning more closely to the subject at hand, the newest novels by my favourite hard-boiled detective fiction authors, with the fresh hard-boiled dilemmas these works are sure to place in the familiar, oft put upon, character. with the advent of on-line technologies, i have learned that the serialized novel is experiencing something of a re-emergence. its popularity is coming from the ground up with amateur writers of fan fiction realizing unparalleled popularity with their serialized releases (streitfield, 2014), but also in new forms such as the serialized web comic homestuck, which is garnering millions of followers as well as favorable critical comparison to ulysses for its depth and complexity williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 6 (knode, 2012). additionally several prominent publishers are exploring serialized publication for their latest novels (alter, 2013). i proposed the possibility of a serialized release to the journal’s editor and was honored when this idea was favorably received. in a further innovation, dr. moules suggested we seek out the scholars from my committee, all important voices in applied hermeneutics or disability studies, and inquire if they would be interested in writing editorial introductions to frame and contextualize each new release. i was elated when all of them agreed, and feel that the commentaries these scholars will provide are as much cause for excitement and anticipation as the various parts of the novelization. a warning brace yourself for this journey. as detective max hunter remarks the mystery of the appearing/disappearing slow learner was, and is, a messy case and one that requires hard-boiled resilience. the world of educational classification can be dark and, in its own way, violent. be careful, however, not to become too hard-boiled as readers. the best operatives realize that, though it makes for greater suffering, a keen sense of empathy is not a weakness; it is an essential tool of the trade. there are, after all, missing persons to find. note from journal of applied hermeneutics editor, dr. nancy moules it is with excitement and the experience of privilege that we welcome the work of dr. john williamson in presenting his doctoral thesis in “instalments” in the journal, trusting that we capture the integrity of the mystery and rigor of his important doctoral research. this work won the 2015 university of calgary chancellor’s graduate medal. in future instalments as we engage in this hermeneutic mystery, we will offer, as editorial comment, reflections from the scholars who informed and vetted this work. references alter, a. (2013). the return of the serial novel. the wall street journal. retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/sb10001424127887324020504578396742330033344. armstrong, f. (2002). the historical development of special education: humanitarian rationality or “wild profusion of entangled events”. history of education, 31(5), 437-456. blundel, b. (2010). paul ricoeur between theology and philosophy: detour and return. bloomington, in: indiana university press caputo, j.d. (1987). radical hermeneutics: repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. bloomington, in: indiana university press. couture, j.c. (2012). inclusion alberta’s educational palimpsest. ata magazine. 92(3). davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: suny. williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 7 norton, j.d. (2005). chasing a beam of light: einstein's most famous thought experiment. john d. norton. retrieved from http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/goodies/chasing_the_light/index.html gadamer, h-g. (2004). truth and method. (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). london, uk: continuum. gilham, c. (2013). the hermeneutics of inclusion. unpublished doctoral thesis. university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. retrieved from http://theses.ucalgary.ca/handle/11023/828. gough, n. (2008). narrative experiments and imaginative inquiry. south african journal of education, 28, 335-349. graham, l., & slee, r. (2008). an illusory interiority: interrogating the discourse/s of inclusion. educational philosophy and theory, 40(2), 277-293. mystery. (n.d.). in online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=mystery heidegger, m. (1962). being and time. (j.macquarrie & e. robinson trans.) new york, ny: harper collins. jardine, d. (1998). awakening from descartes nightmare: on the love of ambiguity in phenomenological approaches to education. in to dwell with a boundless heart: essays in curriculum theory, hermeneutics and the ecological imagination. new york, ny: peter lang. knode, m. (2012). homestuck is the first great work of internet fiction. tor.com. retrieved from http://www.tor.com/2012/09/18/homestuck-is-the-first-great-work-of-internet-fiction/ mehan, h., herweck, a., & meihls, j. (1986). handicapping the handicapped. stanford, ca: standford university press. mytvmemories (january 18, 2012) “ dragnet – the big winchester, from the nbc television episode first broadcast by march 4, 1954” retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4ju-9. singer, p. (2009). the life you can save. new york, ny: random house. srour, m. (2013). frankenstein: a novel every biologist should read. teaching biology. retrieved from http://bioteaching.com/frankenstein-a-novel-every-biologist-should-read/. streitfield, d. (2014). web fiction, serialized and social. the new york times. retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/technology/web-fiction-serialized-and-social.html?_r=0. williamson, w.j., & field, j.c. (2014). the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an williamson journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 1 8 interpretive mystery. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 4. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy53b5wq7 microsoft word mcconnellfinal.docx 1 faculty of nursing, university of calgary corresponding author: shelagh mcconnell email: mcconnsj@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics september 27, 2012 the author(s) 2012 the hidden nature of death and grief shelagh mcconnell1, nancy j. moules1, graham mccaffrey1, & shelley raffin-bouchal1 abstract western culture can be described as death-denying and youth-obsessed. yet this has not always been the case. only a few generations ago, death was very much part of life where people died at home with their families members caring for them. a shift occurred, in part, because of the unprecedented advances in medical science that the western world has seen over the past 40 years. health care professionals now have the knowledge and the technology to prolong life in ways that were previously not only unattainable, but inconceivable. regardless, the reality that death will eventually come for each of us has not changed; merely our perception of it has. this perception is influenced by the hidden nature of death in our society. this begs the questions: if death in our culture is something to hide, to conceal, and to keep secret, then what does that say about our ability to express grief? what does this mean for those who face it as part of their chosen profession? how might we understand the nature of suffering for those who turn toward the suffering of others? this paper interpretively examines the nature of hidden death and hidden grief in our society. keywords death, grief, hermeneutics, hidden, pediatric palliative care nursing death is the ugly fact which nature has to hide, and she hides it well. alexander smith through my* years of practice as an acute care nurse at a large pediatric hospital, i have often been in the presence of dying children and grieving families. i have learned how to care for these children and how to talk about death with their family members. i have also learned about the culture of hiding death and grief from not only other patients and families in the hospital, but also from my colleagues, friends, and family members. the expectation that nurses mcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 2 and other health care providers are somehow immune to loss and grief intrigues me and has inspired me to examine death and grief beyond the confines of the hospital and to explore the topic within the larger context of society. western culture can be described as death-denying and youth-obsessed. as a result, people go to great lengths to disguise even the signs of natural aging. one quick look at popular magazines and television advertisements will support the truth in that statement. the natural process of aging is hidden and so, too, is the dying process and death itself. ever more, the elderly are hidden in nursing homes; the dying are hidden in hospitals and hospices. in fact, daniel callahan, a philosopher who has written extensively on topics related to ethics and health policy wrote that “the present period might best be characterized as a revolt against death itself” (callahan, 2009, p. 106). only a few generations ago, death was very much part of life. for instance, in canada in 1926, one in five children would not survive to their first birthday (statistics canada, 2008). as a result, just about everyone would have lost a child close to them: son, daughter, neice, nephew, or grandchild. by comparison, today in canada fewer than one in 100 children die before reaching the age of one (statistics canada, 2008). therefore, today fewer of us are directly affected by the death of a child. death was closer; death was familiar. family members cared for their dying loved ones at home. death was not a private loss but was taken as a blow to all those who survived, both family and strangers. death required public affirmation of human solidarity against a harsh and indifferent nature. it was not to be hidden: families should be there when death was at hand, and the door thrown open to neighbors and even those passing by in the street. (callahan, 2009, p. 104) death is no longer perceived to be so close. people do not seem to live with the “ancient belief that [death] is inevitable, an immutable and unchangeable fact and human fate” (callahan, 2009, p. 104). a shift occurred, in part, because of the unprecedented advances in medical science that the western world has seen over the past 40 years. health care professionals have the knowledge and the technology to prolong life in ways that were previously not only unattainable, but inconceivable. the reality that death will eventually come for each of us has not changed; merely our perception of it has. advancements in medical science and technology have given us a false sense of being able to defy death, to avoid it, and perhaps even to postpone it indefinitely. william haseltine, ceo of human genome sciences, once said that “death is nothing but a series of preventable diseases” (callahan, 2009, p. 107, citing fisher, 1999) which is absurd, but this statement does highlight our cultural desire to conquer all diseases. it also draws attention to our cultural expectations around death and dying—the expectation that the ultimate goal is to keep people alive at all costs. increasingly, we see examples where “our technology has surpassed our humanity” (ferrell, 2006, p. 927). we see instances where patients are kept alive through the use of machines and medication which surely prolong suffering and certainly do not prevent the patient’s inevitable death. the hidden nature of death the word “hidden” means “being out of sight, not readily apparent, concealed” (merriam-webster, 2012). as the word “hidden” is closely related to “conceal” it is also relatmcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 3 ed to the idea of aletheia, which is the greek word meaning truth-as-unconcealment (online etymology dictionary, 2012). aletheia, whose etymological roots are connected to the word lethe, which literally means “forgetfulness, oblivion” (online etymology dictionary, 2012) is also, according to greek mythology, a river in hades. western society has become accustomed to the concealment of death from our lack of knowledge of what goes on behind the scenes of a funeral home, to our euphemistic language when talking about death, to keeping our grief out of sight. some may argue that death is not hidden in western culture as our fascination with death is obvious in popular media: from movies and television to crime novels and even in news reports. stories of death attract interest and attention, yet when it comes to the death of someone close to us, when it comes to experiencing a “real” death, this fascination is often replaced with not only grief, but also disbelief and a desire to hide from experiencing emotional pain. western society increasingly caters to this desire to hide and to avoid facing the reality of death and grief. for instance, this is demonstrated in the decreased popularity of open-casket funerals in favour of “soothing ceremonies of remembrance” (callahan, 2009, p. 103). i have attended many funerals, particularly of children who i came to know through my work as a nurse. frequently, the memorial services for children from traditionally western families have been focused on a “celebration of life” with photos and toys, but no caskets or urns to be seen. often at these services, those in attendance are somewhat restrained in their outward expression of grief. i have also attended opencasket funerals of children from other cultures where handling of the body was common as was the public display of grief. for instance, i attended one funeral where the mother literally screamed in emotional agony through the entire service and at one point actually got into the casket of her dead child. the image of that haunts me even today. i now wonder if that event was particularly troubling because of our society’s desire to hide death and grief. am i merely uncomfortable with being denied the protection and luxury of concealed death and grief? the hidden nature of grief if death in our culture is something to hide, to conceal, and to keep secret, then what does that say about our ability to express grief? the message is simply “in a word, dear friends, keep your grief to yourself” (callahan, 2009, p. 105). it would seem then that hidden death is accompanied by hidden grief. the expression of grief, even by those who are identified as the bereaved, is not welcomed to be openly displayed for all to witness. furthermore, grief in our society is expected to have a time limit, despite the research that would suggest that grief is never overcome, but adapted to (attig, 1996; moules, simonson, prins, angus, & bell, 2004; neimeyer, 2001). it would be impossible for me to recall all the times i have heard statements such as “my dad died six months ago and i thought my mom would be doing better by now” or “if her son died three years ago, then why is she still not over it?” as a result, grievers are forced to hide their grief to keep it a secret. despite the expectations of society to conceal grief, the expression of grief is not always hidden intentionally. grief has a way of evading description (moules et al., 2004) as it lacks clarity and is difficult to define just by its very nature (cowles & rodgers, 1991; jacob, 1993; rodgers & cowles, 1991). the challenge in articulating grief is apparent through the use of metaphors (e.g., mcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 4 describing grief a journey, a neverending fall, or an uninvited houseguest) as well as silences when those suffering talk about their experience of grief (moules et al., 2004). this is the inarticulate nature of grief (moules, simonson, fleiszer, prins, & glasgow, 2007). it would seem then that grief itself at times seeks to be concealed. the obligation of those who face death even when our culture encourages us to hide death and grief, some people refuse to do so. in fact, they turn towards it. interestingly, “to hide” means not only “to conceal” but also “to turn away” (merriam-webster, 2012). there must be something special about those people who choose to go against the norm and face death, something different about those who choose to turn toward death and not hide from it. some people are attracted to professions that encounter death because they have a personal history of loss, while others have spiritual reasons for wanting to work with those who are approaching the end of their lives. having met a variety of professionals who care for the dying, i do not believe there is any one reason why people do this work. some nurses, physicians, social workers, and chaplains devote their life’s work to caring for the dying and the bereaved. others work hard at it, but after a few years they move on to other jobs. nevertheless, what i have experienced and observed when faced with death and dying is that there is the sense of obligation to the patient and family. “obligation” means “something one is bound to do,” a commitment, and a responsibility to another (merriam-webster, 2012). caputo wrote that obligation is a feeling that comes over us when others are in need (caputo, 1993). obligation happens before we enter the room and stand at the patient’s bedside (caputo, 1993). we are suddenly overcome by something that demands our response (caputo, 1993). the power of the obligation is strong enough to override our desire to run from the room, to cover our eyes, to pretend that death has not come to call. despite wanting to close the door and avoid witnessing tremendous pain and suffering, our sense of obligation will often take over and demand our presence. this is despite the fact that there may be no tasks to complete, no conversations to have, no charting to write. yet our sense of obligation compels us to remain at the bedside and to simply bear witness to what is transpiring. the term “bear witness” means “to testify” and “to authenticate” (merriam-webster, 2012). there seems to be an obligation to witness times of suffering and death. etymologically, the word “witness” is related to the word “martyr” (online etymological dictionary, 2012) meaning someone who constantly suffers (merriam-webster, 2012). in the current vernacular, being a martyr is not considered to be a particularly good thing; however, if we consider its use as someone who suffers with others, the term is particularly appropriate. i would be remiss if i did not also explore the meaning of “to bear” as i have with the word “witness.” the meaning of “to bear” is particularly appropriate in the context of supporting the dying and the bereaved: “to support a weight or strain” and, with this meaning, it is a synonym for “to suffer.” it would seem that suffering is a fundamental part of bearing witness as both words are linked to the word suffer. furthermore, the word “bearer” has the historical meaning of “one who helps carry a corpse to the grave” (online etymological dictionary, 2012). nurses usually do not literally carry a corpse to a grave. nevertheless, i do think the work of nurses, and othmcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 5 ers who work with the dying, carry the patient and family through the experience by way of the care and presence we provide in times of suffering and grief. interestingly enough, if i take the word “bear” yet one step further and examine the homophone “bare” it further enriches the meaning of bearing witness. “bare” means “lacking appropriate covering” with synonyms such as “to uncover, to reveal, to expose, to uncloak” (merriam-webster, 2012). not only is “bearing witness” the idea of authenticating suffering, but also revealing the suffering through our presence. i have been a witness to dying and grief, but found i had neither words of consolation nor gestures of comfort. i could simply bear witness to be present, to carry, to authenticate, and to suffer. the hidden nature of working with the dying and the dead when we witness pain, suffering, dying, and death, we are changed. what does this mean for those who face it as part of their chosen profession? how might we understand the nature of suffering for those who turn toward the suffering of others? is this experience of witnessing suffering as complex as the experience of grief itself? i have spent my nursing career working with the pediatric palliative care population. while i had once aspired to be one of those nurses who spend their careers caring for dying children, i came to realize that this was not to be my journey. i am not one of those nurses. i am no longer able to sit with the dying and the bereaved. i have been with families in moments of intense grief and suffering. when i hear others talk of their experiences with the dying, my own stories begin to resurface, begin to reveal themselves. my own memories of suffering are no longer tightly contained in a box in my brain marked “i wish i could forget.” why is that? why not tell these stories rather than conceal them? is there a burden to these stories? does the burden lie in telling stories that others do not want to hear? as a newly graduated nurse, i very quickly came to realize that my friends and family were interested in the cute and uplifting stories about the children i cared for at the hospital. they were not, however, interested in the stories of death and dying. they did not want to hear about suffering and pain. the burden, then, is mine to carry—a burden that cannot be shared. even if i wanted to tell some of my stories, i would not know where to begin. such is the inarticulate nature of grief (moules et al., 2007). yet i have heard families of children who have died tell their stories. what makes my version of the story inarticulate? i want to understand this better. i had the opportunity to interview two of my colleagues on this topic for a research project. one nurse spoke at length about a palliative child with whom she had developed a special bond. the nurse even went so far as to say “[child’s name] and her family were like family to me.” then i asked her how she reacted when she learned of the child’s death, and she said that she was devastated by the loss and was overcome with sadness. then she quickly added, “but i don’t have grief.” why deny the existence of grief a universal human experience that is completely appropriate in the face of loss and death? perhaps nurses are not experiencing grief, but rather something else? if not grief, then what? or perhaps nurses simply believe that the ownership of grief is held by the patient and family and not by the nursing staff? this notion is consistent with some of the work of doka (1989) on disenfranchised grief. in the case of nurses, they are often not seen to be a member of the bereaved mcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 6 family. therefore, they hesitate to express grief, thus often forcing them into silence (kuhn, 1989). when nurses experience loss through their work, they often believe that they neither have the right to grieve nor is it their place to do so (lev, 1989). even when nurses have developed a close relationship to a patient who dies, they are denied the opportunity to grieve; such is the hidden nature of nurses’ grief (clements & bradley, 2005). there may be something else at play here. the combination of the inarticulate nature of grief and disenfranchised grief would seem sufficient to begin to understand the phenomena. yet i am drawn back to the work of caputo on obligation. certainly there is an overwhelming sense of obligation to bear witness to death and suffering. however, in the context of nurses’ work, particularly in the acute care setting, there are also the issues of managing conflicting obligations, responsibilities, and expectations. the pain of turning towards death is intensified in the chaos of acute care. i vividly remember a shift when i was assigned three patients: two with treatable illnesses (one with a urinary tract infection and the other recovering from a tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy) and one who was actively dying. i badly wanted to be available to the dying child and her family in those last precious moments. i wanted to have the time to try to make those moments count. yet because of my obligations to the other two children and their families, i kept being called away by those other responsibilities and compelled to respond to the demands imposed upon me. in comparison to the needs of the dying child, the demands of the other families seemed trivial. one father yelled at me for being 10 minutes late giving his son tylenol. because of our duty to protect the privacy of others, i could not tell him why i was late. i could not tell him that i was making hand and foot prints of a dying child. i wanted to scream at his selfishness, at the unfairness of parents having to watch their children die, and the failure i felt for not being able to protect a child from death the ultimate human failure. when grief refuses to remain concealed we all seem to play a part in this concealment. nevertheless, the stories of death, dying, and suffering live within us stories that may be hidden, but are never completely forgotten. we all carry grief. we all live with grief, which seems to need to expose itself every so often. i have worked very hard to keep my stories of grief hidden. even so, they find their way out. often at unexpected times, stories of grief take over my vocal cords and make themselves known to an unsuspecting audience. perhaps it is unnatural for grief to be hidden indefinitely for it is not its true nature. grief likes to appear and disappear as it sees fit. grief is a trickster. grief is unpredictable. it hides between our words, refusing to be captured, then comes tumbling out unexpectedly at another time. it would seem then that, on occasion, grief wants to be let out through our stories. in a sense, grief itself wants its burden to be shared. footnote *although this paper is co-authored, it is written in the first person of the first author: mcconnell. references attig, t. (1996). how we grieve: relearning the world. new york, ny: oxford university press. callahan, d. (2009). death, mourning, and medical progress. perspectives in biology mcconnell et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 11 7 and medicine, 52(1), 103-115. doi: 10.1353/ pbm.0.0067 caputo, j. d. (1993). against ethics: contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. bloomington, in: indiana university press. clements, p. t., & bradley, j. (2005). when a young patient dies. rn, 68(4), 40-43. cowles, k. v., & rogers, b. l. (1991). the concept of grief: a foundation for nursing research and practice. research in nursing & health, 14(2), 119-127. doka, k. j. (1989). introduction. in k. j. doka (ed.), disenfranchised grief: recognizing hidden sorrow. (pp. 287-299). new york, ny: lexington books. ferrell, b. r. (2006). understanding the moral distress of nurses witnessing medically futile care. oncology nurses forum, 33(5), 922-930. jacob, s. r. (1993). an analysis of the concept of grief. journal of advanced nursing, 18(11), 1787-1794. doi: 10.10461j.13652648.1993. 18111787.x kuhn, d. (1989). a pastoral counselor looks at silence as a factor in disenfranchised grief. in k.j. doka (ed.), disenfranchised grief: recognizing hidden sorrow. (pp. 287-299). new york, ny: lexington books. lev, e. (1989). a nurse’s perspective on disenfranchised grief. in k. j. doka (ed.), disenfranchised grief: recognizing hidden sorrow. (pp. 287-299). new york, ny: lexington books. merriam-webster, 2012. merriam-webster online: http://www.merriam-webster.com/ moules, n. j., simonson, k., fleiszer, a. r., prins, m., & glasgow, b. (2007). the soul of sorrow work: grief and therapeutic interventions with families. journal of family nursing, 13(1), 117-141. doi: 10.1177/107 4840706297484 moules, n. j., simonson, k., prins, m., angus, p., & bell, j. m. (2004). making room for grief: walking backwards and living forward. nursing inquiry, 11(2), 99-107. neimeyer, r. a. (2001). reauthoring life narratives: grief therapy as meaning reconstruction. israel journal of psychiatry and related science, 38(3-4), 171-183. online etymological dictionary, 2012. online etymological dictionary: http://www. etymonline.com/ rodgers, b. l., & cowles, k. v. (1991). the concept of grief: an analysis of classical and contemporary thought. death studies, 15(5), 443-458. statistics canada. (2008). canadian demographics at a glance. retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/91-003-x/91003-x2007001-eng.pdf microsoft word paul editorial corrected proof.docx corresponding author: jim paul, phd email: paul@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics april 7, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 invited guest editorial just saying: for h/heaven’s sake… here’s hoping -- “all hell could break loose!” jim paul bodies are not only biological phenomena but also complex social creations onto which meanings have been variously composed and imposed according to time and space. (karkazis, 2008) preface if you have been reading, to date, in the journal of applied hermeneutics, dr. john williamson’s phd thesis-come-novel serialized, then you have read, more or less, four texts: • guest editorial: preface to “a strange and earnest client” part one of the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery by w. john williamson [january 11, 2016]; • the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery. part one: a strange and earnest client [january 11, 2016]; • invited guest editorial. lives worthy of life: the everyday resistance of disabled people by nick hodge [february 22, 2016], and • the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery. part two: cells of categorical confinement [february 22, 2016]. my name is jim paul. i am the invited guest editorial provider for the third installment of john’s work titled part three: all hell could break loose. paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 2 editorial remarks part three is, in my opinion, methodological interpretive research magic, which carefully advances the investigation regarding the educational category of slow learners. the methodological magic is evident, in this section, in how max explores portrayals of slow learners in popular media, exposes john williamson’s deep implicated-ness with slow learners, opens up the archival history of slow learner as an educational label, and wrestles with the complex history of programming for slow learners in the province of alberta. as you will read, max is getting closer to revealing what is really at stake in the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner. so, here and now, i seek to make a case, in this editorial, that the content explored in part three is necessarily required regarding the case at hand, but the magic in this section is how the writing manifests as max’s internal and external voice didactically positions and re-positions a reader into and out of the content both intellectually and emotively. that invitation is achieved, i believe, in this section, because of how max exists, phenomenologically and hermeneutically, often at the same time, as teacher and learner. let me explain and let me begin where part three concludes as a clue that leads this editorial forward. (max) i pulled into the passenger drop off and thanked summit for his candor as he thanked me for the ride. before he got out of the car, summit gave me the names of a few curriculum leaders currently working with the k & e series of classes and told me where i could find them. then he offered a theory about how to find justice for slow learners that didn’t make much sense to me at the time. he told me to look to my own methods for an answer. i felt there was practical wisdom in so much of the rest of what he said; i hoped i might gather some more clues to shed some light on this last cryptic statement. (italics emphasis added, p. 55) “he told me to look to my own methods for an answer.” indeed. is it not attributed to socrates that… the unexamined life is not worth living. so, max… examined. max is a true hard-boiled mystery formula detective. true to intent and form, throughout a convoluted twist and turn, friend as foe, foe as friend, investigation all pales in comparison to his unrelenting quest for the discovery of and necessity to bring justice to the case at hand. as such, it is his very being, language, actions, and mere presence in the service of seeking justice for slow learners that seems to position him as a significant threat to all involved directly and indirectly in the case. as max digs deeper and wider into the case, in part three, the push-back against his investigation increasingly becomes more layered with twists and turns and, of course, max is routinely assaulted, captured, drugged, and beaten by a layered criminal element who seem to have vast political, economic and social powers. so, we, as readers, experience max as a quintessential hard-boiled detective who is deeply marginalized and often dark, vulgar and verging on being an illegitimate “professional” not unlike sleazy lawyers, or shady cops, or used car salesmen. however, it is also obvious that max lives as he chooses to. as well, embodied, again, in his life style is a rejection of the sanctioned and privileging modernity markers of standard decorum and normalized achievement. max is, paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 3 more or less, not a standard antihero as he moves beyond being merely an irritating grain of sand, and becomes a significant threat whereby the criminal rich, powerful, and beautiful attempt to draw max into their worlds and to use him for their own corrupt purposes. ironically, when max is invited in, he finds himself confirming that such worlds are riddled with what he knows already to exist categorical violence, layers of deceit and quagmires of corruption. still, max’s own storied marginality not only sustains him in such circumstances it continuously serves to feed his quest for contextual justice. while all the discoveries of villainy, duplicity, and corruption are necessary plot essentials, in part three, it is how the criminality element is threatened by max’s very presence that is directly linked to how max methodologically exists that also illustrates the life-blood of his hard-boiled being-ness. max, found wanting as a modern person, citizen, and as a regular detective, plays a complex and ambiguous adversarial role to hard-boiled villains at hand who are often disguised as seducers, or provocateurs, or even allies. what max reveals in the tangled layers of criminality evident in part three is that categorical evil has become essentially systemic within modernity’s operational and functional designs. it is max’s paradoxical mix of suspicion and respect, cynicism and honor, attraction and repulsion, brutality and sentimentality, and failure and success and his unrelenting need for justice served wrapped up in his own world of violence and treachery, that explicitly opens up the regimes of persuasive corruption and criminality evil endemic to modernity’s heavenly sought politically powerful, economically-divided, and hierarchical social orders. so, why can’t modernity, via its categorical guardians, deal with max if he is merely just another paper-tiger or glass elephant, antihero construct? simply, i believe, methodologically, as a socratic-like pedagogue, max opens, by drawing out, modernity’s dominating cartesian metaphysics of presence. modernity, and its institutional agencies and grand design discourses, seeks to continuously encode and decode humans into accepting the given commandment categories of rational-defined splits between mind and body, individual and collective, and between exposition-argumentation and narrative-description. remember, max has chosen to cast himself out of modernity’s heaven on earth, and in doing so, he seems to know that h/heaven and h/hell is a false dichotomy. max, crudely and rudely, like a displaced hell-boy in heaven, via his embodied and mindful pedagogic use of the ancient greek socratic method returns modernity’s scribal society (purves, 1990) and its split-inducing mechanisms writing and reading literacy and numeracy to their original, negotiable difficulties as categories of this-that, here-there, now-then, and i-you also as false dichotomies. again, how so? max is a socratic-embodied pedagogue even if he doesn’t know it; he is it… a solitary unified symbiotic learning-teaching presence. plato was teaching, then, precisely at the moment when the new technology of reading and writing was shedding its specialized ‘craft’ status and finally spreading, by means of the greek curriculum, into the culture at large. the significance of this conjunction has not been well recognized by western philosophers, all whom stand – to a greater or lesser extent within plato’s lineage. plato, or rather the association between the literate and his mostly non-literate teacher socrates (469?-399 b.c.e.), may be recognized as the hinge upon which the sensuous, mimetic, profoundly embodied style of consciousness proper to orality gave way to the more detached, abstract mode of thinking engendered by alphabetic literacy. indeed, it was plato who carefully developed and brought to term paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 4 the collective thought-structures appropriate to the new technology. (abram, 1996, pp. 108-109) it is plato’s teacher, socrates, who seemed to have understood that a radically different language game would mean a radically different form of consciousness, meaning-making, and determiners for what counts as sanctioned or not ways of knowing, doing and being. the movement from orality reality and its primary sensory-representational ways of storied knowing, doing and being to a referential, abstract alphabetic-phonic sign system would mean for all things – human and otherwise – a new world order riddled with penultimate categorization. in an old technology orality-based society, a speaker’s word-actions are birthed, developed and legitimated throughout oral exchanges within a speaker’s membership in a collective whereby ways of knowing, doing and being are learned. the teaching speaker and the listening learner as one is a necessarily present embodiment of the collective’s cultural practices, moralities and social customs. the socializing power of an orality-based collective lives in its method of inclusive induction for members which requires all present be spoken into the collective’s past, present and future. presence becomes the cultural methodological learning-teaching requirement. presence is the essential element of a reality metaphysics in orality-driven cultures whereby narrative as words, actions and images are presented as emotive storied expressions to all gathered. the wordimage-action performances are witnessed in the emotive moment and it is in this being situationally presence whereby understanding and meaning making regarding self, other and world via story-telling and story-receiving lives. embodied in the telling and listening relationship is a reciprocal responsibility to ensure connectivity between experiential understandings of pastpresent-future and self-other-world. in the specific arrangements of story-sounds, story-images, and story-performances, cultural virtues and vices are passed on as living entities. and herein lives a fundamental aspect of an orality-based society. the qualities of what it means to be right and wrong, good and bad, truthful and deceptive, or just and unjust and so on are intertwined with meaning derived, over time, as embodied in the specific storied-narrative contexts. all virtues and all evils and so on were situationally locatable in the stories told over and over from century to century as lessons to be learned and retaught. always, however, what counts as virtue or evil is explicitly defined experientially by the workings of the storied representational contexts. situations, meanings-derived, and the oral representations of those situations were one and the same. as such, in an orality-based culture, all vices and virtues are justifiably experienced as a storied-event alive with intent, meaning, understanding and impact. that is why, in the presence of a story, one becomes responsible to re-tell the story because the pedagogy of transferability demands it. socrates was an inherited storied-being. he was an orality-based human being. he was pedagogically presently to his student, plato, when the alphabet-writing-reading literacy technologies were emerging. however, as plato acquired these new technologies, he was also his teacher’s student. as socrates projected the alphabet literacies manifest as writing-reading would fix, concretize and render, ironically, orality and narrative as untrustworthy and an old technology. the new literacies required disciplined training in encoding and decoding and the future was to be one dominated by visible/see-able codes, policies, laws, commandments, rules and scripts. socrates challenged plato to understand the new literacies required a split between subject and object, and of writer-speaker from reader-listener and literally such gaps would lead to recognizable and measurable differences. as well, within the inherited recombinant and abstract paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 5 referential nature of the new literacies, socrates foresaw the directionality of the new literacy paradigm as preparing the ancient greeks to adopt the concept of “-ness.” that is, if the alphabet is referentially abstract, then reasonability indicates all things were conceptually referentially absent but gap oppositional definable as well. if “-ness,” like whiteness, chair-ness, or faithfulness, was a referential category, then it must have an ultimate, ideal and unchanging reality essence. everything and anything could have multiple shape-shifting forms, but only one true essence for example, water (h2o) may deceptively be a liquid or solid or gas. such a concept of “-ness” leads on quickly to ordering and cementing those now so obvious life-world dichotomies and polarities previously contextually and complexly storied but now seemingly just waiting to be named, grouped and declared categorically. philosophical, pragmatic, and natural sciences evolved to accomplish such a task to seek out, via hypothesizing, experimenting, or autopsies the discovering of the essential essence of everything on, under, or over this planet and its characteristic shape-shifter attributes and properties. it became the norm to imagine, dream, theorize, invent and meditate the existence of a perfect essence perfection unaffected by uncontrollable circumstances, or mutating contexts, or born-to-die bodies. descartes studied the ancient greeks and read plato and aristotle. he read about how alphabetic literacy emerged and the civilizing power it held, and the possibility of human beings progressing developmentally towards godly-heavenly perfection on earth or beyond. being cognitively reasonable, descartes dismissed plato’s teacher’s (socrates) thought and methods because they were, well, unusable in that they were storied and thus deemed illogical, emotional, and irrational. so, descartes confirms his head-selected, mind-verified and falsified ancient greek inherences and fixes western progress on one pathway forward, a cartesian modern world. a world whereby selected polarities and dichotomies become privileged and writing-reading literacies and numeracy must continue to be the definitive citizen-personhood sorting machine technologies regarding what constitutes inclusivity or exclusivity as a tribal member of western civilization. today, contemporary citizens and persons are awash in the normalcy of cartesian precise category developmental measurements. what counts as normal, verifiable, and justifiable progress and development for everything and everyone is to be sorted by gradations according to established and verifiable standards of necessary judgmental exactness within fixed and normalized categories. the need for constant reductive literacy/numeracy testing and the categorical judging of everything and everyone into elevated winners and grounded losers actually justifies itself as a legitimate process just look at the amazing progress of the west. this is systemic modernity, and it is protected by its guardians who are robotic discourse vampires selectively trained to suck the living blood out of every and each failed category thus ensuring each opposition pales in comparison to the desirable heavenly categories glorified by such unjust comparison. the institution of schooling becomes the primary literacies learning sorting machine. within the institution, mimicking modernity, the preferred and privileged discourses are numbers and exposition or argument word-thought-action arrangements. the motto for schooling becomes: one, two, three… testing, testing, testing. learners are measured and categorized according to their effective and efficient dexterity with literacy and numeracy. as well, today schooling’s mandate has a new partner digital and social media technologies manifest as popular culture is every bit or more effective as a trainer of the young within modernity’s design for perfection. media plays directly, experientially, to the minded-eye, but the message is the same regarding paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 6 how one must be if he or she is to achieve posthuman (hayles, 1999) perfection. as godly posthumans, via forever advancing communication and social technologies, we can achieve the dream of elevating ourselves, virtually and pragmatically, from that dead-weight tangible sensory ‘thing’, a decaying body, holding us down in everyway imaginable. with modern literacies technologies as elevated, abstract and ideal languages, human beings can take a rightful place as the ultimate abstract prime signifier a single solitary unified god-ness perfection incarnate. yes… max! max is basically, in my opinion, a throw-back to a narrative-based socratic human creature incarnate. he is self-authored as his own counterfactual and as such a storied o/other represented as a modern loser wrapped up in a disguising, imperfect body. yet, as a storied interruption max presents an unsettling and threatening presence to modernity and its guardians. he does not speak as they do he doesn’t use exposition or argument. i believe, he embodies the simple socratic method that evokes in all around him, more or less, to a greater or lesser degree, interpretive angst. perhaps, such a vibration is all that is need to move the categories of this-ness and that-ness. in part three, max consistently and continuously seeks out persons to engage. he asks all speakers to repeat and re-tell what they said. in doing so, he gets them to reflexively listen to what they were mouthing explanations, reasons, rules, justifications, and so on. in doing so, he socratic-like induces speakers to wonder or question, if only for a moment, about their own lack of being present in modernity’s objectifying knowing, doing and being design. once voice has been located and then dislocated via questions that come to rest in how justification for this or that might be understood in a moment, even modernity’s guardians’ catch a glimpse of how they have become essentially, as paulo freire once commented, narration sick. via max’s method, those he engages with friend and foe are re-located not in the abstract, but in a specific bawdy, emotive, complexly experiential context of a storied moment. in that moment justice, courage, strength and ethics slip out of their fixed scribal categories and are returned to their original contexts-specific difficulties. that is, in the evocative moment, one feels compelled to re-understand the categories that have been so taken for reasonable granted-ness. right and wrong, good and evil, or just and unjust are no longer universal abstract constructs, but contextually-specific living entities requiring personal re-authoring. max is a storied pedagogic moment. he is a threat to all those who must live, ironically, those stories advancing the story that humans are not essentially storied persons and citizens. postface in part three, max works his way through portrayals of slow learners in popular media culture that reveal more about modernity than slow learners, he attends to williamson’s deep, selfdeprecating, humbling, and storied implicated-ness with slow learners, and max investigates the archival ‘factual’ history of slow learner as an educational label, and concludes by attending to the “official” history of programming for slow learners in the province of alberta. however, in every situation where max takes up his case to examine slow learners, in part three, he subsequently tracks down or attracts a modernity guardian of the categorical status quo establishment or even resisters to that agenda. using a hermeneutic phenomenology-sympathetic socratic method, max calls upon every guardian and resister to lay bear their storied-ness or not, implicated-ness or not, in the case of slow learners. the beauty here is max uses the essential reflexive questioning method very well, because he doesn’t really know he is using it, but rather he is it. max is a walking and talking question mark, period. his mere presence demands a response! paul journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 3 7 when face-to-face with max those with criminal intent or those experiencing such intent, having reflexively, if only for a moment (because that is all it takes is a pedagogic moment) understand that they have authorial rights and responsibilities, and not to use them is to live a life unexamined. in this process, in this pedagogic context, all humans being, more or less, recognize, archetypically, we are all storied entities. max raises the interpretive possibility, again, if only as an in and out breath’s moment, of shaking the decontextualizing, objectifying fixedness of modernity’s meta-desires. max is the counterfactual who, in this case, truly and actually, and magically, reminds all presence that every grand narrative is nevertheless also a fabric of millions and millions micro-stories. slow learners are especially already storied persons. max’s storied presence brings into the reflexive light the real possibility that we all, categorically, could be otherwise, and we should be deeply shaken by the rigidity of modernity’s categories that prevent us from knowing that there by the grace of a magical outcome of nature and nurture, go i. the unexamined life is not worth living. how max is max pulls everyone friend or foe reflexively towards such an examination. seemingly, many of us are no longer able to or feel the necessity to do so; we are literate but deaf and dumb to what that really means to attend to self as other and other as self. here’s hoping, in part four, that max continues to be a methodological hell-boy cutting a swath of reflexive destruction through all those living in denial of s/self and s/self as o/other and that we are all symbiotic storied creatures and narrative beings and in and of itself that may be all we really are! “i sent my soul through the invisible, some letter of that after-life to spell: and by and by my soul return’d to me, and answer’d: ‘i myself am heav’n and hell’.” omar khayyam references abram, d. (1996). the spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world. new york, ny: vintage books. cawelti, j. (1976). adventure, mystery, and romance: formula stories as art and popular culture. chicago, il: university of chicago press. hayles, k. (1999). how we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and infromatics. chicago, il: university of chicago press. karkazis, k. (2008). fixing sex: intersex, medical authority, and lived experience. durham, nc: duke university press. kreeft, p. (2008). socratic logic: a long text using socratic method, platonic questions, and aristotelian principles (ed. 3.1). south bend, in: st. augustines press. purves, a. (1990). the scribal society: an essay on literacy and schooling in the information age. london, uk: longman group. pynchon, t. (1984). slow learner: early stories. boston, ma: little, brown & co. microsoft word davey corrected proof final.docx corresponding author: nicholas davey, phd email: jrndavey@dundee.ac.uk journal of applied hermeneutics november 10, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 a hermeneutics of practice: philosophical hermeneutics and the epistemology of participation nicholas davey gadamer’s “philosophical hermeneutics” leaves several unresolved questions inviting further development. (1) if scientific methodology is no longer the counter-balance to questions of procedure in the humanities, what can hermeneutics offer the sciences in grappling with the absence of certainty? (2) why does gadamer not develop the notion that understanding is a type of movement? what is understanding’s seemingly perpetual disquiet? (3) gadamer’s case that understanding is an event is part of his rejection of the kantian thesis that “knowing” is grounded in subjective consciousness. the question of how such events are generated is unresolved. placing the event of understanding in a linguistic horizon establishes its ontological pre-requisite but offers no insight into the mechanisms that have to be in place to facilitate its emergence. this paper will suggest that the notion of practice (itself a philosophical theme not extensively discussed in gadamer) offers three possible answers to these questions. (1) practice evolves notions of certitude other than those that are strictly epistemological. (2) practice is often driven by a quest for completion (vollzug) which proves instrumentally disruptive and a means to new insight. the drive for completion is a candidate for generating understanding’s disquiet. (3) practice facilitates not so much a fusion but a collision of horizons capable of generating unexpected transformations of understanding. all three answers suggest the development of philosophical hermeneutics into what will be termed a participatory hermeneutics. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 2 aims what is the future of hermeneutics? the aim of this paper is fourfold. 1. to use a discussion of the notion of practice to contribute to the current debate about the future of hermeneutics. 2. to present a discussion of practice as an element of a much larger project concerning recent philosophical challenges to both the methodological legitimacy of both hermeneutics and the cultural legitimacy of the humanities. 3. to confront those challenges in an attempt to restore faith in the cognitive content and cultural relevance of both hermeneutics and the humanities. 4. to offer a new hermeneutical approach to the understanding of the transformative effects of the practices that constitute these disciplines. the unifying argument concerns the need for philosophical hermeneutics to embrace an epistemology of participation to the end of re-building a notion of the hermeneutic subject in the context of a debate about the nature of practice loosely described here as those disciplines which depend primarily upon knowledge by acquaintance (savoir). the unresolved one of the unresolved questions in philosophical hermeneutics concerns the cognitive role of the subject. gadamer’s hostility to the kantian notion of subjectivity as the ground of knowing is well known. what is needed, however, is something that gadamer’s thought points to but does not fully articulate i.e., the notion of the subject as participant rather than adjudicator or judge. philosophical hermeneutics self-announces with a kantian question: what are the pre-conditions of understanding? the answer is shaped ontologically and derives from heidegger’s conception of being as eventual: the preconditions of understanding are ontological including tradition, language, and culturally received subject-matters (sachen). this, however, is no answer: the epistemological question is displaced by an ontological assertion. the consequence is twofold. (1) language becomes an all powerful super-subject (koegler, 1996) and (2) the role of subjectivity in understanding denied (kelly, 2004).1 this creates an obvious difficulty. if language generates substantive undecideables (polyvalent meaning), how are the undecided possibilities decided and acted on? are they self-selecting? arguably, practice invokes a notion of participatory intervention. does talk of participatory intervention imply a return to a notion of autonomous subjectivity? arguably, not. talk of subjectivity traditionally implies a co-relative notion of objectivity. however, contemporary science is increasingly calling into question the notion of an independent extra-mental reality. the notion of an “out-there” that is an objective co-relative to subjectivity is becoming unsustainable. what is emerging is a conception of actuality in which all 1 see koegler (1996, p. 116) kelly (2004, p. 103) 2 friedrich nietzsche; “the assumption of one single subject is perhaps unnecessary: perhaps it is just as kelly (2004, p. 103) davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 3 entities are to varying degrees creatures of possibility. we might intuit this “new” objectivity as the sum of interactions between living processes. the conceptual links between interaction, hermeneutics and a participatory hermeneutics call out for development. this is the basis for the argument that hermeneutics should develop a participatory epistemology. from subject to participant and so, with regard to resolving the unresolved within philosophical hermeneutics, the following is an outline of a participatory epistemology. 1. the participant-subject is always ‘positioned,’ always a part situated in a larger nexus or whole. 2. the participant subject is an embodied subject, not standing apart from the sum of relations that constitutes its environment but simultaneously acting on and being acted on by it. 3. such a subject is always located within a situation that is both historical and linguistic and, in gadamer’s words, “to throw light on it (the situation) is a task that is never entirely completed” (1989, p. 269). 4. to be is to do: participatory-subjects are in effect clusters of activities, not beings that act but actions that have a being insofar as they are effective agencies: their essence is a consequential construct, an effect of and not a pre-requisite for action. 5. subject-participants are, to use nietzsche’s phrase, multiplicities that act as subjects but are not actual subjects. they are processes of assemblage or com-posure that gather received events and possible courses of action into one constantly revising story, identity, or practice.2 the consequences of a “positioned” subject for hermeneutical thought are suggestive. they imply that: 1. the experience of an embodied and hence situated subject is multi-registered, and not to be reduced to any singular mode of interpretation. though it may reflect a point of view, it cannot be reduced to a single perspective. 2. the situation of a participant agency is not subject to final description: if each and every cultural positioning is linguistic, its character can never be fully articulated. in language there is no final description of any position albeit that language will always seek the finality that is constantly inferred from it.3 3. because embodied experience will also be an experience of the temporal, that experience will also be perspectival i.e. characteristic of a specific temporal, spatial and cultural location. a given perspective is rarely self-transparent though its characteristics are often clearer when discerned from another perspective. there is always more to a positional centre than a singu 2 friedrich nietzsche; “the assumption of one single subject is perhaps unnecessary: perhaps it is just as permissible to assume a multiplicity of subjects whose interaction and struggle is the basis of our thought and our consciousness in general? … my hypothesis: the subject as multiplicity…the continual transitoriness and fleetingness of the subject”. nietzsche (1968, section 493). 3 gadamer contends in this context: “hermeneutic philosophy, as i envision it, does not understand itself on an “absolute position but as a path of experiencing. its modesty consists in the fact that there is no higher principle than this: “holding oneself open to the conversation” (gadamer, 2007, p. 34). davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 4 lar perspective can imagine. that participatory epistemology should (indeed, ought to) be invoked in favour of inter-disciplinary research is no surprise. 4. the situated subject is a dialogical, negotiable being. the other can see things about my perspective i cannot see: i need the other to present me with perspectives enabling me to think differently about the possibilities within my own. each (dialogical) position is unfinished and unfinishable, “constantly under pressure” to open itself to what is other than itself.4 5. the situated-subject is grounded in what transcends it. if a position’s character and possibilities depend upon the nexus of historical, linguistic and cultural horizons it is placed within, each “position” is dependent the sum of inter-actions it is part of. these five axioms of hermeneutical positioning have an interesting consequence: they suggest that reflection upon the nature of practice should be (or, stronger, is) the heart of a “philosophical” consideration of hermeneutics. the reason to support the claim and thereby strengthen the link between participatory epistemology and hermeneutics is as follows. 1. practices (in the various forms of understanding, interpretation, representation, creativity) presuppose positioning in the ontological sense outlined. 2. positioning within culture and language implies part-icipation. 3. participation is interactive: the part can change the character of the sum (whole): speaking matters because it changes matters. 4. practices are, then, vehicles of transformation, forming and yet formed by their participants. so, thinking through the relationship between participatory epistemology and hermeneutics opens three conceptual routes to articulating a hermeneutics of practice. towards a hermeneutics of practice the three routes to the prioritisation of practice as a hermeneutical thematic entail: 1. the replacement of the cognitive subject by participatory centres, that is subjects ontologically formed in and through practice. 2. practice considered as formative of the narrative-self or hermeneutic identity (ricouer), it is a source of effective and confident inter-action with other such subjects. 3. the collapse of the geistes-naturwissenschaft distinction, a corollary of which is the replacement of epistemological certainty with practical confidence. as these three routes conceptually entail each other, i shall deal with them collectively under the sub-themes of practice and its formative powers, uncertainty, and confidence. 4 see williams (2014, p. 122) davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 5 practice, uncertainty, and confidence “the most precious thing in life is its uncertainty” (yoshida kenko, essays in idleness, no. 7.) paradoxically, philosophical hermeneutics is built on an abandoned but still influential distinction between the certainties of science and the alleged uncertainties of the humanities. wilhelm dilthey is specifically criticized by gadamer for looking to the sciences for the certainties that life cannot provide: “dilthey’s need for something firm is explicitly the (his) need for protection from the frightful realities of life. …he expects the uncertainty and unsureness of life to be overcome not so much by the stability that the experience of life provides as by science,” (gadamer, 1989, p. 239). the question becomes how to reconcile “uncertainty” about existence with “confidence in existence”? an answer to the question indicates how practice can be understood as formative, indeed, as initiating a form of bildung. gadamer (1989) contends that “the certainties of science are different from the certainty acquired in life …” (p. 238) and, what’s more, “the unsureness of life is to be overcome by the experience of life that the experience of life provides …” (p. 239). what are these non-epistemic certainties and how does life provide them? the key to this is the expedition of practice itself. gadamer invokes tradition as a non-epistemic source of certainty or, rather, confidence. “tradition in the form of morals, religion and law, rests (in contrast to methodical doubt), on a knowledge that life has of itself” (gadamer, 1989, p. 238). uncertainty may be assuaged by initiation into the firmer structures of inherited thought though since when, it might be objected, is tradition a guarantor of stability? (dilthey’s loss of faith in theological tradition is a case in point). however, it is not the “values” transmitted by tradition that inspire confidence. rather, it is the practices the commitment to modes of doing that nurtures it. this suggests that it is practice-acquired-confidence that displaces the (unrealisable) epistemic quest for certainty.5 what is it that builds confidence in existence and displace the dissipating nihilism of hyperbolic doubt? what can we trust to and be confident of? gadamer answers, we can trust to language and tradition. the claim is an obvious re-working of heidegger’s notion of the existential condition of geworfenheit: the finding of ourselves inexplicably cast into the contingencies of language and cultural tradition. however, “certainties” are not simply acquired by immersion in tradition and language alone. the certainties of life are won: they are achievements, not the certainties of knowing but those of doing, of participation, and of involvement. the certainties of life are those emergent certainties won through confident engagement with various practices. practice forms the practitioner. practice is formative. practices involve repetition, memory, adjustment, failure and success: upon these rhythms the confidence to perform is built. participatory engagement with a range of practices enables the capacity and confidence to engage and develop. tradition and cultural horizons are the preconditions of practice but they do not build the certainties gadamer speaks of. it is the engage 5 the word confidence is built around the word faith (fide): to confide is it to have faith in who one confides in. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 6 ment with practice and the self-insight it affords that grounds the certainties and confidence of the practiced performer, whether artist, doctor or scientist. certainty and confidence is won through participation and engagement and not through the classical routes of epistemological detachment. this suggests that it is through practices that the identity of the practitioner emerges. if practices involve repetition, memory, adjustment, failure and success, a provisional narrative identity emerges. the individual centre (the situated subject) achieves a practical point of selfcomposure: the individual formation is a composition, an integration achieved in and through the skills of practice, a composition only arrived at indirectly. such a composition is a narrative identity: a centre of possibilities which is always open. this establishes a conceptual link with the notion of a situated subject. it is from within my practice that i have something to say, and can speak to that which allows me to speak. my narratively established identity offers direction and anticipation. living narratives are by definition on-going, incomplete, temporal projects. they offer a unique point of orientation inflected by their past and their implicit future (how they might unravel in the both the positive and negative sense). the point is that it is the poise and assuredness of the accomplished practitioner that affords a relatively stable narrative identity. however, we are always vulnerable to what we have confidence in. the vulnerability of practical understanding the poise and assuredness of the accomplished practitioner affords a degree of fulfilment. the confident practitioner is recognized as an effective member of a community of practitioners. yet such fulfilment is always momentary, local, and can be undermined at any moment. modes of narrative understanding, as well as analogical forms of reasoning and understanding, are particularly subject to internal deconstruction. the practical or narrative identity which participation in a practice affords is at the same time vulnerable to being deconstructed by the same horizons of meaning that enable its emergence in the first place. being a “situated subject” is not only to be enabled but also to be threatened by the linguistic and historical worlds one is located in. narrative identities are vulnerable to the infinite varieties of description (or counter-narratives) that being in a language world affords. narrative identities are “vulnerable” because they are connected with several horizons of anticipation and expectation. i might build a pattern of sense around certain linguistic meanings. the polyvalence of all meaning suggests that the same signs and symbols when placed in another pattern of sense can disrupt the pattern i have built. the practical identity that participation in linguistic horizons affords is at the same time vulnerable to the very horizons that enable it. there is an inevitable dialecticity to our participating in a sum of inter-active relations: what they enable (the emergence of a position), they can equally disable (deconstruct): what language gives, language can take away. an account of this dynamic is missing from philosophical hermeneutics, a striking omission in need of address. davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 7 what keeps understanding moving? there is no account of this problem in gadamer’s hermeneutics and it is a question which must be confronted if we are to consider the question of understanding’s transformational power. having established that understanding, interpretation, and representation are practices, what makes such practices inherently unstable and vulnerable to change? returning to the discussion of narratives, narratives involve expectations and projections. in a sense, all narratives confess their unrealised nature. narratives are on-going stories: there is much within them that remains possible. narratives house intuitions of (albeit unrealisable) completeness. this exposes a formal tension in gadamer’s hermeneutics between epistemological completeness and aesthetic completeness (vollzug). formally, there is no end, no definitive, no final interpretation able to close a narrative. the reasons for this are clear: (1) the infinity of language horizons makes the task of interpretation endless, (2) the problem of incommensurablity (no interpretation can be fully adequate to its subject-matter) renders formal completion in interpretation impossible, and (3) the fact that participatory epistemology cannot transcend and fix the sum of world constituting relations means that other interpretations are always possible. yet there is a distinction between seeking for the (final) meaning of something (epistemological closure) and seeking for something that can bring meaningful (aesthetic closure). the artwork offers an appropriate model. artworks have a “sense”: no lines of meaning scatter within them. they are “closed circles of meaning, in which everything is fulfilled” (gadamer, 1989, p. 101) so that “more becomes known than is already known” (1989, p. 102). what comes to completion (vollzug) within an artwork is not the infinity of (indeterminate) meanings underwriting it. to the contrary, an artwork takes singular aspects from a subject-matter’s infinite horizon of possibilities and weaves them into a “meaningful whole” enabling the recognition of something as something with “its chance and variable circumstances” (gadamer, 1989, p. 102) removed. an artwork does not concretise all its possible determinations of meaning: a determinate set of possibilities is selected and rendered “whole.” it becomes seen as “aesthetically complete” (1989, p. 102), that is, … seen as “something” as if for the first time. the vorgriff der vollkommenheit emerges, then, as an hermeneutic a priori, an analytic condition of any experience of coherence. the anticipation of completeness is a consequence of interpretive engagement with the openended possibilities within a horizon. translating them into intelligible sequential structures, establishes narrative forms where none were previously were perceived. the anticipation is, in effect, that intuitive sense for where a work is going. the quest for aesthetic completeness within a practice is a quest for what might give sense to the indeterminacies at play within that practice. it is, we argue, the quest for aesthetic completeness that drives understanding’s disquiet. this gives an explanation of why aesthetic experience plays such a foundational role in philosophical hermeneutics. conclusion i have argued that a future for philosophical hermeneutics lies in the direction of a hermeneutics of practice. practices are, we contend, forms of “sense-making.” they represent different ways davey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 8 of organising the indeterminacies of human experience. as modes of “sense-making,” they assume and pursue a completion (vollkommenheit) of meaningfulness. this brings us to a seminal point: it is not what a practice pursues that matters but that it pursues it. to put the point another way, it is often the emergent insights that a practice generates by default rather than the ones it anticipates that prove transformative. the condition of this possibility is ontological rather than epistemological. the situated practitioner or participatory subject is linguistically and culturally positioned. such positioning is always shaped explicitly and implicitly by the cultural and historical horizons that define it: explicit in that the horizons set the initial orientation of the practitioner and implicit in that orientation is subject to being changed by the emergence of unrealised nuances of meaning from within those horizons. it is a mistake to think of such positioning in a singular way, as if being situated only involved a single linguistic or historical horizon. the situated practitioner is more a point of transection between a variety of horizons; personal, professional, linguistic, literary, national, social, and philosophical. arguably, philosophical hermeneutics simplifies the number of horizons at play within understanding and as a consequence underestimates the transformative educational capacity of hermeneutical engagement. the situated nature of understanding means that it is always at a juncture of a variety of individual and cultural horizons. what enables transmission between different horizons concerns the formal operation of simile, metaphor, analogy, and the place holding function of concepts. because of the formal operations of language and thought, being situated as a participatory subject is always to be subject to having one’s understanding challenged and transformed. understanding is always at a juncture. broader cultural meanings presently unknown to me can impact on those within my own narrative and issues of personal narrative can unexpectedly transform how a wider cultural concern is grasped. to be a participant, to be positioned, is to be simultaneously open to deconstruction or re-construction in one horizon precisely because of its linguistic and conceptual connectivity with others. the quest for vollzug and vollkommenheit is instrumental in occasioning such orientational shifts. gadamer rightly insists that hermeneutical understanding is not a matter of grasping facts or intentions but a question of acquiring a sense of where an argument is going, a sense of what a work or practice is aiming at even though such ambition may not have, as yet, been achieved. having an anticipatory sense of where a project or a narrative might take us is key. in other words, although understanding may have a singular object (making sense of a particular text), understanding is never singular. we bring to any engagement a range of expectations and anticipations deriving from a variety of commitments. bringing to completion what remains at play within a narrative is key for, as argued above, it is the pursuit rather than the pursued that is critical. it is what the pursuit of completeness in one horizon inadvertently puts into play in other associated horizons of meaning that matters. because no horizon of meaning whether personal or historical can exhaust the possibilities for meaningfulness within it, the pursuit of completeness in one horizon may impact upon another, prompting unexpected and transformative patterns of sense to arise. each humanities discipline practises the impossible: the pursuit of an anticipated completeness (vollkommenheit). and yet, it is only in the controlled pursuit of the impossible that the unexdavey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 7 9 pectedly possible can arise. in the horizons of language where the as yet unsaid can be as eloquent as the spoken, “things are always waiting to happen” and those things can be “gamechangers,” serendipitously rather than methodologically arrived insights capable of transforming a framework of understanding. hermeneutically constituted practices venture, then, controlled risk: the risk the over-turning of established narrative identities; the gain extending old identities in new ways or establishing new practices altogether. considered ontologically, a hermeneutics of practice is the key to understanding the transformative capacities of the humanities. we conclude that practices are forms of “sense-making.” they situate a participatory subject in horizons of linguistic and historical possibility. practices represent different ways of organizing the indeterminacies of human experience. as modes of “sense-making,” practices assume and pursue a completion (vollkommenheit) of meaningfulness. it is not what the practice pursues but that it pursues it that matters. the pursuit of interpretation’s end aesthetic completeness is but a means to induce a key effect i.e., achieving that transformation of understanding which is, arguably, the primary end of hermeneutics and the humanities (increasing the range of existential possibilities). in gadamerian terms, to play one must be in play for it is only by playing that one can put into play what is not yet in play. this is what a participatory hermeneutics demonstrates. references gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed., j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). london, uk: continuum. gadamer, h.g. (2007). the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings. (r. e. palmer, trans.). evanston, il: northwestern university press kelly, m. (2004). a critique of gadamer’s aesthetics. in b. krajewski (ed.), gadamer’s repercussions: reconsidering philosophical hermeneutics (pp. 103-122). berkeley, ca: university of california press. kenko, y. (1967). essays in idleness. the tsurezuregusa of kenkō (d. keene, trans) new york, ny: columbia university press. koegler, h.h. (1996). the power of dialogue. cambridge, ma: the mit press. nietzsche, f. (1968). the will to power. (w. kaufman & r. j. hollingdale, trans) london, uk: wiedenfeld & nicolson. williams, r. (2014). the edge of words. london, uk: bloomsbury. note this paper was first presented at the hermeneutics of practice workshop at the university of dundee, may 2015, and subsequently at the north american society for philosophical hermeneutics annual conference, philadelphia, september 19, 2015. microsoft word hovey et al final.docx corresponding author: richard b. hovey, phd email: richard.hovey@mcgill.ca journal of applied hermeneutics june 8, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 synergistic research in medical education: some philosophical reflections richard b. hovey, charo rodríguez, steven jordan, & angela c. morck abstract in this paper, we present and discuss the “synergistic research approach,” from quantitative and qualitative through mixed methods, as a term that refers to an academic endeavour in which researchers are not only committed to comprehensiveness and rigor, but also – and importantly – to excellence in peer processes that further enhance knowledge generation by emphasizing the philosophical underpinnings thereof. we outline the hermeneutic wager, which provides the philosophical grounds for synergistic research, and explain the reasons why we consider this perspective to be of particular interest in the health profession education field of inquiry. keywords synergistic research, medical education, philosophy of science, hermeneutic wager, personcentred care, research methods as in other health-profession domains, health profession education’s connection to empirical research, traditionally dominated by quantitative methods, has become increasingly open to qualitative research and mixed-methods approaches (lavelle, vuk, & barber, 2013; tavakol & sandars, 2014). positivist/post-positivist paradigms have framed research conducted in natural sciences, and provided the basis for the evidence-based trend in medicine, dentistry, and allied medical sciences. qualitative research approaches, the origins of which can be traced through their application within social sciences, have in turn shaped important medical movements, such as narrative medicine and professionalism. hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 2 concomitantly, the mixed-methods movement has forcefully emerged as a new orthodoxy in health, social and educational research, particularly since the 1990s. the mixed-methods research community has in fact been very successful in introducing mixed-methods studies and pragmatism as the third paradigm in education research (johnson & onwuegbuzie, 2004). as emphasized by creswell and garret, “[a]t this moment in the development of research approaches, the educational researcher needs a large toolkit of methods and designs to address complex, interdisciplinary research problems” (2008, p. 321). some view mixed methods as “direct descendants of classical experimentalism and the triangulation movement of the 1970s” and believe that they “presume a methodological hierarchy, with quantitative methods at the top” and “with qualitative methods playing a subordinate, ancillary role in illuminating quantitative data/findings” (denzin, 2012, p. 81). mixed methods researchers themselves, however, define their approach as “a movement that moves past the paradigm wars by offering a logical and practical alternative” (johnson & onwuegbuzie, 2004, p. 17), one which they view as superior to any purist approach for fulfilling research needs. despite its unquestionable popularity, mixed methods is, according to its tenets, a research movement that is still very much in development (tashakkori & creswell, 2008). this may be due, at least in part, to the controversy it has provoked (e.g., denzin, 2010; giddins, 2006; symonds & gorard, 2010). interestingly, although the reflexive stance displayed by some leading mixed methods researchers is laudable (e.g., bergman, 2011; creswell, 2011), a sort of purism can also be identified in this community of scholars: the same purist stance that they associate with scholars framed within the first and second research paradigms (johnson & onwuegbuzie, 2004) when they in turn state that research innovation, interdisciplinarity, and best ways to face complex problems seem only possible through mixed methods research (e.g., hesse-biber & johnson, 2013). advocating for synergistic research in health education our intention in this paper is to respectfully contribute to this debate by proposing a synergistic research approach to health profession education. two main, intertwined arguments support our proposal. first, in contrast to morgan (2007) who argued that there is “little reason why purely epistemological issues should be of major interest to social science research methodologists” because “that is the province of philosophers” (p. 68), we contend, with others, that this is precisely the researcher’s philosophical stance when conducting research that “fleshes-out” the research process and makes it truly substantive. in support of this position, see for instance vattimo (2011), who stated that we cannot simply accredit the truth of our practices to science or the application of science without appealing to what he terms “the paradigmatic horizon within which every correspondence is verifiable” (p. xxxiii). vattimo agreed with gadamer’s (1996) argument of practice, in terms of phronesis, that is to say that we should not merely accept a theory or research outcome as truth without paying heed to context(s) that require attention and a depth of understanding (lund, panayotidis, smits, & towers, 2012). secondly, at a more practical level, we view synergistic research as an academic endeavour that aims not only to examine complex problems in a comprehensive and rigorous way (something empirical researchers of any allegiance agree with), but also to emphasize excellence in peer processes whereby new knowledge is generated precisely by considering the philosophical hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 3 underpinnings of thereof. in an era in which specialization is rewarded everywhere and seen as preferable, the intention of synergistic research is to bring together researchers from different disciplines and experts in specific domains who hold uniquely different backgrounds and experiences and whose research may be framed in different paradigms, but who are united by their shared concern with the philosophy of research. synergistic research would therefore be instantiated in interdisciplinary research programs that, beyond the mere use of multiple toolkits for research, are respectful of different paradigmatic requirements for exploring the same phenomenon in a complementary, comprehensive, and inclusive manner. our advocacy for synergistic research in health professions education has an ultimate goal: to meet the imperative need to educate medical and other health providers in a way that enables them to overcome the current tension between science and care. as noted by dunn and jones (2010), “[w]e found that care and science logics coexist, moving through periods of balance and imbalance and residing in perhaps an uneasy tension that is not easily resolved in medical education” (p. 139). this is foundational to the understanding that a research project is not interdisciplinary if it merely borrows or replicates methodologies from different disciplines without truly understanding the philosophical and theoretical premises that are foundational and that provide rigor and substance. why the tag “synergistic” research? we adopted the term “synergistic” research to help describe this approach because it refers to a collective effect that is greater than the sum of our individual research approaches, pre-understandings, and epistemologies. etymologically, the term is derived from the greek word synergia, meaning “joint work, a working together, cooperation; assistance,” which is in turn derived from synergos, meaning “working together” (from syn“together”+ ergon “work”). in english, synergy commonly refers to an advanced effectiveness as a result of cooperation. this is more than a mere application of method but speaks to the possibility of an expanded horizon of understanding, through research that is at its core dialogical, open, and interdisciplinary (synergy, n.d.). if language matters – which it does – then the words we choose to name our research philosophy also helps to establish the quality of the team’s interactions: that is, how inclusive and relational the co-participants are with each other and, especially, with research participants (gadamer, 1960/1989; wittgenstein, 2009). researchers become aware that “understanding is not something that takes place at the end of humanistic research about an object, it stands at the beginning and governs the whole process of questioning, step by step” (gadamer, 2001, p. 50). within this research approach, we understand that the production of best or promising evidence needs to be inclusive of multiple epistemologies, ontologies, methods, statistics, narratives, analyses, and ways of knowing. research begins with a topic and defines how the questions of interest are to be researched through conversations with scholars from various disciplines, through education, and in particular through different ways of knowing. through researcher engagement focused on a common or shared topic, we can begin to think creatively about how to best answers questions that generate new knowledge together. by reifying methods, that is, by being method-driven and choosing the research method first and then aligning the topic to fit the method (even mixed methods), we can lose the very essence of what we are trying to understand. research… hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 4 is basically not a problem of method at all. it is not concerned primarily with amassing verified knowledge, such as would satisfy the methodological ideal of science –yet it, too, is concerned with knowledge and with truth. but what kind of knowledge and what kind of truth? (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. xi) philosophical underpinnings of research our philosophical orientation for synergistic research is grounded in hermeneutics, which advocates that subjectivity is not a barrier to superior objectivity, but rather an opening to it. subjectivity in the sense of having a distinct but negotiated point of view can be regarded as enabling a new and different understanding to emerge (davey, 2006; gadamer, 1960/1989). learning from the other occurs when the other challenges our knowledge, experiences, and preconceptions. the result of dialogical hermeneutics encounters are intended to leave both parties thinking in different and unexpected ways about the analysis given and received. the formal employment of part/whole figures of thought clearly contributes to the transformation of understanding, yet such transformation happens to us and in unpredictable fashion (gadamer, 1992). these we contend cannot be achieved by application of method alone, but are actively achieved through encountering and valuing other perspectives (theories). otherwise, learning may be mistaken for an affirmation of something already known, or for an extension of that knowledge, but not as new learning. to understand conscious subjectivity requires a “positive commitment to deepening and exploring its enabling assumptions suggests that objectivity can no longer be understood as the absence of subjectivity” (davey, 2006, p. 19). in other words, humans live and experience their world in context and interpretively; consequently all research, including those that methodologically strive for objectivity to determine truth, will always be influenced by the contextual disposition of human experience. philosophical hermeneutics distinctly assigns a dignity to the difference between researchers and their participants and/or patients, and contends that the differential space of the in-between has its beginning in the process of the hermeneutical encounter, which invites us to allow those who see and think things differently to expand our understanding (gadamer, 1960/1989, 1992). this is contrary to most traditional methodological research thinking, but intriguing: a process through which one does not deny, suspend, or bind one’s background and biases, but through which one strives to understand and use them, because it is through heterogeneity of thought and commitment to one’s discipline vis-à-vis others that sophisticated new and different understanding may be achieved. synergistic researchers are aware of the value of the relational within the research process and the need for conversation and reflection as essential properties to successful interdisciplinarity (hovey & craig, 2011). the hermeneutic wager the hermeneutic wager (kearney, 2010) is a means of assessing personal and professional risk of engaging within a synergistic research approach; because the researchers are interested in the same topic and each one is already an accomplished investigator with his or her own methodological expertise, this approach invites openness, authenticity, and a focus on the relational aspects of working together (treanor, 2010). however, our encultured ways of knowing and hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 5 understanding one’s role may provide hidden barriers to interdisciplinary research, a privileging of certain kinds of research methods or one’s perceived status within the research team (hovey & craig, 2011). inspired by kearney’s work (2010), we offer five conversation topics as a reflective process to co-create an interdisciplinary research team that is stronger, more creative, and has greater potential to understand complex health concerns: imagination, humility, commitment, discernment, and hospitality. the hermeneutic wager from richard kearney’s philosophy (2010) was adapted into an application or a practical approach to building interdisciplinary teams in research. this approach is relational as it helps to describe what each researcher brings to the table from their discipline specfic knowledge. the hermeneutic wager provides a philosophical-relational foundation from which a team can be built (treanor, 2010). this perspective aligns with the work of philosophy that as gadamer (1998) stated is “to clarify concepts, not to present a new body of knowledge through empirical research” (p. 101). applied hermeneutics is, in brief, a means to gain a deep understanding of a topic, human experience, or event. it does so through conversation with others, who can add other perspectives and understanding to a shared topic or experience of interest, such as the differences encountered when interdisciplinary researchers work to build their team. the hermeneutic wager is about decision-making and describes a conversational process to guide the interdisciplinary research team’s development and to build a highly functional team. in practice, the hermeneutic wager consists of five conversations that are not to be understood as a linear progression nor a series of graduated steps where when one is completed the team graduates to the next step and so on until all five have been achieved. rather, the five conversations of imagination, humility, commitment, discernment, and hospitality are circular in nature, as each one may resurface, again and again, during the building of the team and will last through the duration of the team’s tenure. the hermeneutic wager keeps the conversation alive, promotes understanding through the interpretation of new knowledge, and is open to differences among the team members. a wager also speaks to the individual team member’s perceived risk during their participation. the risk is weighed out through the participant’s capacity to change in order to contribute to the team as an equal. this may impinge of one’s socially constructed professional identity or perceived hierarchy and status. the hermeneutic wager’s conversations help to identify these risks personal and professional and bring them forward so that they can discuss and be addressed, rather than remaining hidden. imagination the first conversation invites imagination. for this, all members of the research team imagine what together they could accomplish as an interdisciplinary team with its advantages, challenges, and value. the research teams discuss strengths and limitations from multiple perspectives. these discussions are conducted openly and express pre-understandings, reflections, and attitudes from team participants. the intention of the imagining conversations was to begin to creatively explore potential interdisciplinarity without restrictions, limitations, or only discipline hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 6 specific encultured thinking. imagination is where ideas flourish, are discussed, and considered for their potential to exceed individual or siloed understandings. the imagination conversation introduces very little risk to one’s perceived research role. the intent is to explore, share, and envision. although this conversation is mostly hypothetical, it does provide a means to move from ambiguity to a shared perspective of what the interdisciplinary team and research could become. humility the next conversation, humility, entails reflection, both personal and professional, to see beyond encultured perceptions, personal/professional identity, wants, and needs and move toward what has been imagined through the previous conversation. humility invites generosity and thinking that enhances the potential openness to other perspectives, possibilities, and understandings. humility is meant to alert participants of their beliefs, values, and behaviours that might interfere with team building and function. this conversation for some participants may offer a higher level of risk. it calls into question participants’ ability to encounter and understand others perspectives that may be different than one’s own. the humility conversation also asks participants to reflect upon how they and others position within the interdisciplinary team. it entails a willingness to be open to other team members’ strengths and how these might be utilized within the team structure. this premises that at certain points during the research process some members will take a leadership role while, at other times, they will allow the strengths of others to come to the forefront and lead. the essence of this conversation is related to the etymological root hume meaning humanizing which can be found in humility, humour, and humanity (kearney, 2010). this speaks to the relational aspects of interdisciplinarity in which humility is about humanizing conversations and forming relationships that bring people together. commitment commitment provokes participants’ willingness to assume the risk associated with the team building process. commitment challenges participants to make explicit their intention to follow through with the process and is an essential condition for the building of highly effective interdisciplinary teams. without commitment from all team members, the process may stall in the superficiality of rhetoric or fail all together. all participants should now have made clear their intentions to continue or not with the team building and research. some participants will be fully supportive, while others may not, and some may remain undecided. if participants are aware of issues that create tension or divisiveness within the team, then specific measures to promote understanding can be taken. commitment to interdisciplinarity must be the unique motivational force that drives the responsibility and desire of team members to work together. this conversation asks participants to examine and be honest about their commitment to the team building process, to the interdisciplinarity nature of the team and research, and to the topic itself. the research teams utilize this conversation as a check in about how the team is progressing overall, but also as individual participants within the process. discernment hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 7 discernment refers to the reality of this team building and research endeavour -in essence, asks the practical question: does what the team has envisioned make sense? discernment challenges imagination because it recognizes that not all possibilities are equal, valid, or realistic. this conversation tempers commitment with the reminder that some wagers are ill advised, impractical, or that some participants may not be ready for the changes to personal/professional selves that the team and the research asks of them. this is the conversation where practical judgment and understandings are confronted and risks are discussed and weighed. discernment asks of participants to examine the enablers and barriers to the team working together and in bringing the research to fruition. it is a formative reality check designed to examine who else might need to be invited as new participants to the team if needed to address gaps in ability, knowledge, financial, or system support, access to the population of interest, or other practical process issues. the team is then asked to brainstorm (re-imagine) around resolutions and other resources that have been identified. discernment means to thoroughly examine its progress and make explicit the concerns before the team fails or falters. the practicalities of the research and the demands of team building initial enthusiasm dwindles if not championed or brought forward by all of the team members. hospitality hospitality means to welcome the research team building process with the participants respecting and honouring their diversity and an unconditional openness with all others with a desire to achieve something extraordinary. this conversation also describes the relational considerations of being with others to ensure the interaction between and among people is just, professional, supportive, and compassionate. hospitality works to keep the process open because interdisciplinary teamwork will always need ongoing and further conversations, research, practice, and engagement. hospitality can also be understood as the relational foundation that keeps the team going. it is the welcoming of, and expectation that there will be, bumps on the road for all research teams during their formation and while they as a team co-exist. it asks of team members to be open to differences in team member’s ideas and working styles. how this is brought to fruition will vary from team to team but at its core is a willingness to be open to learning from each other. these five conversations and reflections cycle back and forth as new considerations, issues, success, set backs or concerns arise. the hermeneutic wager should not considered a linear or sequential structure but rather as five interconnected conversations and reflections that serve to keep team members open and productive to discuss, address, and readdress topics while the team ebbs and flows in its processes. in sum, all members of the research team imagine what a synergistic research approach could accomplish, its advantages, challenges, and potential. all synergistic research team members are openly included in the discussion on its strengths and limitations. this way, all members get to express their own pre-understandings of, reflections on, and attitudes towards the research. the imagination phase subjects the participants to very little risk because this is purely an experience in exploration, sharing and envisioning. imagination’s primary purpose is to help people arrive at hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 8 a shared understanding and express their own ways of knowing and understanding research as interdisciplinary. this requires reflection, both self and professional, to see beyond encultured perceptions, wants, and needs toward what has been imagined through this activity. humility invites generosity and thinking that enhances being open to each other’s perspectives, possibilities, and modes of research. this challenges researchers to make their intention to follow through with the process explicit. it is an essential condition for the development of an interdisciplinary research project to take shape and find its place and culture within the established epistemologies of practice. all of the stakeholders have now made their intentions to act clear – some are supportive, others perhaps not, and others still remain undecided; however, by identifying the issues that create tension within the group, we can then take specific measures to promote understanding. commitment to synergistic research must be the unique motivational force that drives the responsibility and desire for researchers to work together. discernment acts as a reality check to ensure that the synergistic researchers are truly ready to move forward to face the challenges or risks. finally, hospitality keeps the conversation process open because interdisciplinarity will always need ongoing and further conversations and reflections about the research, practice, and engagement. conclusion we contend that synergistic research is essential to exploring health profession education issues that support practitioners in facing complex healthcare conditions where fragmentation of research fails to provide person-centred interdisciplinary health care. the theory (our professional and research methodological expertise and identity) and practice (our professional engagement with learners, peers, and ultimately patients) of research cannot reach its fullest potential without a philosophical foundation that underpins how we offer educational experiences, conduct ourselves as researchers, and focus on interdisciplinarity for enhanced clinical practice. the defragmentation of research means working with others who are different in their ways of knowing, understanding, and researching. working through difficult conversations – those that challenge or disrupt our habitual ways of knowing and researching – can produce new and different interdisciplinary understandings for enhanced human science research, education, and health professional practice. in closing, we advocate research that is interdisciplinary and conversational ways of teaching, learning, and researching through which we strive to become better at everything we do. bios richard b. hovey, phd is an associate professor of oral health and society, and director of faculty development at the faculty of dentistry, mcgill university. chair, mcgill group on transformational learning in health (tlh) charo rodríguez, md, phd is an associate professor of family medicine, and director of the family medicine educational research group (fmer), department of family medicine, faculty of medicine, mcgill university. she is also frq-s senior research scholar. member, mcgill group on transformational learning in health (tlh) hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 9 steven jordan, phd is an associate professor and chair, integrated studies in education, department of education, faculty of education, mcgill university. member, mcgill group on transformational learning in health (tlh) references bergman, m.m. (2011). the good, the bad, and the ugly in mixed methods research and design. journal of mixed methods research, 5, 271-275. creswell, j.w., & garrett, a.l. (2008). the “movement” of mixed methods research and the role of educators. south african journal of education, 28, 321-333. creswell, j.w. (2011). controversies in mixed methods research. in n.k. denzin & y.s. lincoln, eds., the sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 269-281). thousand oaks, ca: sage. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: suny press. denzin n.k. (2010). moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. qualitative inquiry, 16, 419. doi: 10.1177/1077800410364608 denzin, n.k. (2012). triangulation 2.0. journal of mixed methods research, 6, 80-88. gadamer, h-g. (2001). gadamer in conversation: reflections and commentary (r. e. palmer, ed. & trans). new haven, ct: yale university press. gadamer, h-g. (1999). praise of theory: speeches and essays. (c. dawson, trans.) new haven, ct: yale university press. gadamer, h-g. (1992). hans-georg gadamer on education, poetry, and history: applied hermeneutics. (d. misgeld & g. nicholson, trans.) albany, ny: suny press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd ed.; j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. giddings, l.s. (2006). mixed-methods research – positivism dressed in drag? journal of research in nursing, 11, 195-203. hovey, r., & craig, r. (2011). understanding the relational aspects of learning with, from, and about the other. nursing philosophy, 12(4), 262-270. johnson, r.b., & onwuegbuzie a.j. (2004). mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. educational research, 33, 14-26. kearney, r. (2011). anatheism: returning to god after god. new york, ny: columbia university press. hovey et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 9 10 lavelle, e., vuk, j., & barber, c. (2013). twelve tips for getting started using mixed methods in medical education research. medical teacher, 35, 272-276. lund, d. e., panayotidis, e. l., smits, h., & towers, j. (2012). provoking conversation on inquiry in teacher education. new york, ny: peter lang. morgan, d.l. (2007). paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. journal of mixed methods research, 1, 48-76. tashakkori, a., & creswell, j.w. (2007). the new era of mixed methods. [editorial]. journal of mixed methods research, 1, 3-7. tavakol, m., & sandars, j. (2014). quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: amee guide no 90: part i. medical teacher, 36, 746-756. treanor, b. (2010). the anatheistic wager: faith after faith. religion and the arts, 14(1), 547560. symonds, j., & gorard, s. (2010). death of mixed methods? or the rebirth of research as a craft. evaluation & research in education, 23, 121-136. synergy (n.d.) in online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=synergy vattimo, g. (2011). farwell to truth. new york, ny: columbia university press. wittgenstein, l. (2009). philosophical investigations (4th ed.; g.e.m. anscombe, m.s. hacker, & j. schulte, trans.). west sussex, uk: wiley-blackwell. microsoft word pelechcorrectedproof.docx corresponding author: sharon pelech doctoral candidate, university of calgary assistant professor, memorial university email: spelech@mun.ca journal of applied hermeneutics march 8, 2013 the author(s) 2013 teaching science as a hermeneutic event sharon pelech abstract in this article, the author explores the need for science education to be taught as a hermeneutic event, as opposed to a book of facts to be memorized. the fragmented, passive transmission of facts does not allow students to have a clear understanding of science, its’ traditions and how science lives in the world. reconnecting biology back into the world, and recognizing its creativity and uncertainty, will help students understand how science impacts their lives and the world. the author explores how, through hermeneutics, students can experience the living discipline of science, as opposed to learning about science. keywords curriculum studies, hermeneutics, high school biology, learning, philosophy of education, science education upon returning from their immersion week, the first year pre-service teachers in my secondary science curriculum course were excited to talk about their teaching experience, what went well, as well as some of the surprises and learning opportunities that arose for them. after 15 minutes of discussion, megan (pseudonym) spoke up and said “i asked my partner teacher whether i could talk to the biology students about the recent earthquake and tsunami in japan (that happened only days earlier). the teacher responded, ‘no, that is not biologically relevant; it is not in the curriculum.’” the class of pre-service teachers gasped and then a stunned silence settled onto the classroom. there was something in this incident that we knew did not feel right; the living discipline of biology that has been entrusted to us as teachers was not being honored (jardine, 2006). if we simply look at a few of the pictures displayed by the news stations from the japan disaster, we can easily see that pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 2 events such as this that address us are the reason why we teach biology, so that we can understand and be part of the world in which we live. an investigation of the alberta program of studies demonstrated direct links to the skills, attitudes, and content found within the mandated curriculum. instead, megan gave her notes on the respiration system and then a set of questions from the textbook, while the opportunity to root what we know about biology in the world was left behind. yet, at the same time as an experienced biology teacher, i could understand the response of that teacher. in a highly pressured world of heavy curricula, student/parent expectations, and the ever-present standardized test, this response was familiar to me. this moment made me wonder what makes it so that a teacher would feel necessary to respond this way. what is this saying to us about how science is seen in the school? “hermeneutics suggests that these striking incidents make a claim on us and open up and reveal something to us about our lives together and what it is that is going on, often unvoiced, in the ever-so commonplace and day-to-day act of being and being a teacher.” (jardine, 2006, p. 280). in this paper, i explore how science is commonly presented in schools and the impact this has on students in terms of their immediate understanding of science as a subject and, even more importantly, how this way of teaching ignores the urgent need to recognize that school science is perpetuating the conditions that contribute to the current ecological crisis. pretending that there is no ecological crisis is ignoring the inevitable where earth as a system will no longer be able to sustain life. orr (2004) argued that we are educating students as if there is no planetary emergency, or as if environmental problems will be solved by technology. taking science up as a hermeneutic experience can offer the opportunity to explore the complexity and interconnectedness of science with the world and allow student questions to be an opening to new understanding. hermeneutics recognizes that all understanding, including scientific, is “historical, linguistic and dialectical” (palmer, 1969, p. 212). through participation in the experience of science being a hermeneutic event, students may begin to be able to take up science as something more than “deadly dull information that [they] must consume” (jardine, 2003, p. xiv) and begin to understand science connected in its ancestry, traditions, interdependence, conflicts, ethics, and belonging in the world (jardine, 2003). common image of school science according to a study completed by aikenhead (2003), one of the key concerns regarding traditional science teaching is the “dishonest and mythical images about science and scientists it conveys” (p. 12). scientists are often presented as being objective and science and its methods provide absolute proof (mccomas, 1998). what is often lost with this vision is the tentativeness and creativity which are both key components of the process of science. one of the main culprits of this vision is the way laboratories and the scientific method is presented in science classes. in most science textbooks, a linear, lock-step, approach to the scientific method is provided that implies that all scientists follow a common series of steps to do research (mccomas, 1998). many students, in fact, are disappointed when they learn that scientists do not have a framed copy of the scientific method posted above their workbench (mccomas, 1998). the scientific method is presented in classrooms as predetermined, tidy, linear activities students must follow, and then write up to hand in for assessment. there is no imagination, creativity, or opportunities for discovering new ways of pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 3 understanding a concept. instead, students go away with an image of science that does not bear any relation to the lived world of science (blades, 2001). through a comparative analysis of three research projects conducted in england, sweden, and australia, lyons (2006) found that science students held three common views of science education. the first view is that science pedagogy is simply passive transmission of facts from teachers or textbooks to students. the second vision is that the content is irrelevant and boring. dewey described this in his article, child and the curriculum, in 1902. when science is presented as facts without any connection to students lives, it condemns the fact to be a hieroglyph… the most scientific matter loses this quality when presented in external ready-made fashion those things that are most significant to the scientific man, logic of actual inquiry… drop out. (p. 202) the third vision of science education that students commonly hold is that science is a difficult subject. this is not because the students found science intellectually stimulating, instead they described how science is full of terminology and, more importantly, that difficulties arise from the passive learning, memorization of facts, and the irrelevance of the content. lyons (2006) saw these common views as the primary reasons why students are disengaged in science, which has led to a dramatic decrease in enrolment into scientific fields throughout the western world. school science does not engage students in the living field of science as long as the curriculum remains content-driven and pedagogy is driven by standardized testing. blades (2001) described how, as a result of heavy amounts of content-laden curricula and a focus on testing, students’ questions are not allowed to be part of the process of learning science, that the only questions are the ones that are already provided by the teacher. capra (1996) argued that as long as we see information as something that is “lying out there to be picked up by the brain,” that we will miss the “whole network of relationships, a context, in which it is embedded and which gives it meaning” (p. 272). capra’s argument requires a break from the traditions of science education in which science classes are deeply entrenched. hermeneutics offers ways to connect science back to its field of knowledge by allowing students to become part of the conversations, traditions, and complexities of science as an event in understanding the world. [hermeneutics] provides a way to rethink what we experience in our day to day lives as teachers, what we understand teaching to be, … what we understand knowledge and tradition and language and conversation and … the methods of the sciences to be. (jardine, 2006, p. 269) a shift to hermeneutics by focusing on the ontology of teaching science, hermeneutics asks: how does science live in the world as an ongoing emerging discourse, and what traditions are a part of science education? furthermore, hermeneutics asks what does this conversation demand of me in regards to how i take up teaching science? “understanding is to be thought of less as a subjective act than as a participating in an event of tradition, a process of transmission in which past and present are constantly mediated” (gadamer, 2004, p. 291, original italics). understanding is both the goal and the path, so while scipelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 4 ence education often wishes to come up with a final, complete understanding, hermeneutics allows recognition that the process of understanding is never complete. the question then becomes: how do i proceed pedagogically when i understand that science education is not a thing with a final and definitive definition, but always in the process of becoming (smith, 1991)? in many current biology classes, information is given to students, and a predetermined set of questions are asked with predictable, predetermined answers expected. science is often mischaracterized as the application of techniques or calculation methods disconnected from the traditions from which they have come (crease, 1997). finding ways to bring these concepts back into the world, which includes their ancestry, memories that they evoke, and what truths they say about the world is essential to begin to understand the complexity behind why students seem disengaged in science. how can students connect with ideas that are unconnected to the world in which they belong? this is where hermeneutics can speak profoundly to science, by helping to find ways to root these scientific concepts back to the habitat from which they are part of, into what heidegger would call “being in the world” (as cited in kozoll & osborne, 2004, p. 158). being immersed in science as a living field means problems are to be understood more deeply, allowing a spontaneous and yet informed response to a question so that the knowledge can be used to respond to a question in a new and unanticipated way. by exploring in depth the many questions that emerged from the tragedy in japan, biology as a living discipline would open up possibilities and students would be able to see why this information is important and how it lives in the world. hermeneutics frames the possibility of teaching science as a dialectical perspective, where science is treated more as breaking open of questions (gadamer, 2004), as opposed to closing down the conversations by presenting science as a “celebration of closure... and of the end of interpretation” (donnelly, 2002, p. 147). the term bildung has a variety of meanings which imply formation, cultivation, and education (davey, 2006). bildung stresses that hermeneutic understanding does not find the end to a topic, but allows for a deepening of the experience which opens up the possibility for more questions and more demanding experiences. it is within this process where the rigour of the facts and information are required and are able to show how they belong in the world (davey, 2006). hermeneutics can replant the teaching of science back into the world in which the students and science as a field of knowledge are a part. it can help students explore how science presents a particular truth about the world and how they can explore the “perils and challenges of a materialistic account of the world” (donnelly, 2002, p. 149). accordingly, students can recognize how science lives as part of the world, and that it is not simply “storage of knowledge as is accomplished in a dictionary, a catalogue, etc.” (gadamer, 1992, p. 44). the historical, political and sociological aspects are all rooted within science itself, not as something separate to the body of knowledge that is considered science. with this, there is an opening and uncovering of "the ruling preconceptions of the moment [that] uncover new avenues of inquiry and thus indirectly be of service to the work of methodology" (gadamer, 1988, p. 289). hermeneutics also provides an opportunity to recognize “the inner interwoveness of one field of research with another” (gadamer, 1992, p. 45), which allows students to see how science as a field of knowledge is connected to the world and pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 5 invites students to become part of the conversation of science. “the history of mathematics or of the natural sciences is also a part of the history of the human spirit and reflects its destinies” (gadamer, 2004, p. 284). science and the students are both rooted within the same world, which means that science education becomes an opportunity for students to take part of the conversation as well as part of the understanding that is always already ongoing (gadamer, 2004). in my current doctoral research, which explores the question “what does it mean to teach biology well,” i interviewed both teachers and students to explore their experience of high school biology using a hermeneutic framework. one of the questions i asked both teachers and students was: “if teaching biology is mainly about memorizing facts then is teaching biology becoming redundant in the age of instant information through googling? what is the role of biology classrooms?” the responses from both students and teachers indicated that, in a good science class, there was something more happening than just amassing knowledge. there was the connection between ideas and theories and their lives that helped them understand the world of biology. they described how biology became a narrative that helped understand appreciate the complexities of the world. at the 2011 national science teachers association conference in san francisco, keynote speaker astrophysicist dr. jeff goldstein, director of the national centre for earth and space science in washington, dc, described how science taught as a “book of knowledge” did not do it justice, and in fact, was allowing the inheritance of science to be lost. instead, he argued that in order to continue the legacy of science exploration, we need creative imaginative people who wonder about the world. science teachers have to teach not only what we know about our world, but more importantly, how we have come to know it. the journey is where the science lives, and not in the isolated facts that have resulted from the journey. we need to understand where we came from and explore how each generation has added to the book of knowledge, which can then be passed onto the next generation. (re)visiting the biology classroom if we return to the classroom with the young student teacher but this time she was allowed to go ahead and talk to the students about the tsunami in japan, what would a classroom that takes up science hermeneutically look like? jardine (2003) asked us to recognize that the living discipline of biology goes beyond “fixed and finished givens that are beyond question and simply indoctrinate the young into such acceptance” and instead take up the discipline as “not fixed and finished but is rather, ongoing, still ‘in play’, still ‘open to question’ in our human inheritance” (p. 85). one way this could have been experienced is if megan had taken a picture on the internet of the tsunami as it hit japan and displayed it to the students, questions about the impact that this would have on the biological systems could emerge. for example, one picture shows an agricultural field, carefully manicured, with straight, well organized rows of crops growing beside large covered cultivated crops. the top half of the picture shows a black thick sludge of water filled with houses, vehicles and other debris sweeping over and swallowing the pristine fields. allowing the students to begin to ask questions about that one picture would open up the opportunity to understand the impact of that one moment of the tsunami on the ecosystems of japan. in many science classes, student questions are seen as a disruption. in a classroom where science was taken up hermeneutically pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 6 the questions would come to life and become a part of the discipline of science. as these questions emerge, the teacher’s role would be to pay attention to which questions were meaningful and rich to explore, and through this process, introduce the students to the field of biology emerging from their questions and their understanding of the world. often child-centered inquiry projects become shallow when a topic is given. students are asked select something that they are interested in and to go off on their own, research, and return to share this information. the students are fragmented into their own area of interests and often their inquiry remains superficial. to take up the topic hermeneutically, the focus has to be topiccentered, where students can take up the topic in multiple ways in order to understand the topic. the topic demands that the students and teacher pay attention to the discipline of biology it demands an academic rigour in order to understand and contribute to the ongoing conversation that this event calls up. as the questions surrounding the impact of the tsunami emerge from this one picture and as the teacher and the students explore the topic, it allows them to become part of the discipline of biology that is always already in the world, as a result the curriculum outcomes become re-rooted into the world in which they live. for example, the biology 20 alberta program of studies (2009) knowledge outcomes include biogeochemical cycles, ecosystems, and population change and equilibrium as a few examples that need to be understood in order to make sense of what is happening in japan as a result of the tsunami. a teacher who is open to allowing ambiguity, messiness, and complexity to live within the classroom, as opposed to being focused on finality and finding definitive answers would allow student questions to find a voice and a life in the discipline of science. as caputo (1987) reminded us, hermeneutics “does not lead us back to safe shores and terra firma; it leaves us twisting slowly in the wind” (p. 36) this is rooted in the complexity of where biology lives in the world. if students’ questions lead to the resulting nuclear plant destruction, the part of the program of studies (2009) that asks students to understand that “science and technology have both intended and unintended consequences for humans and the environment” has meaning and context from which to take up this understanding. questions on how we could come to the point where a nuclear power plant would be built on a major fault line in a country that experienced the bombing of hiroshima would emerge as part of the greater understanding of science. the connection of the curriculum to the world would, out of necessity, allow the students to: experience, to suffer, to endure, or undergo the arrival of an unfixed future and the questions it might hold, questions we might not have even imagined or desired. this open, living endurance, we suggest, is basic to the disciplines taught in schools. (jardine, 2003, p. 85) students would have the opportunity to realize that “even in the arena of making sense of the natural world, science is a limited discourse” (blades, 2001, p. 86). conclusion gadamer argued that the disciplines that we have been given responsibility for “live in their openness to being handed along” (jardine, 2006, p. 85) and are still open to questions, not only as part of our inheritance pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 7 but also where new understanding and learning emerges. clifford and friesen (2003) argued that “far too little of what most students do in school engages their imagination, fuels their passion to learn, connects them deeply with the world, or wins their hearts and minds” (p. 93). the work our students do is “memorizable… but it is rarely especially memorable” (jardine, 2006, p. 87). the implications of this goes beyond the classroom and trying to increase engagement which, although important, is only one piece of the interconnections that need to be explored as a teacher and a researcher. looking at the ecological implications of students being immersed in the discipline of science also helps the students to experience the interconnectedness of the world, so that they learn not about the earth but how they are part of the earth. capra (1996) wrote that the major world crises of our time are interconnected and interdependent, and recognizing that we cannot study these issues in isolation is essential. education is part of the perpetuation that allows the individualization and progress to be the primary discourse of the “developed” world. education, as it stands today, helps equip people to be more “effective vandals of the earth” (orr, 2004 p. 6). the tsunami disaster in japan is not just an interesting topic to help students become engaged in science, instead it demands that we bring forth the world of science and the understanding that emerges to help make sense of what is happening and where to go from here. this means that the topic demands the academic rigour and clarity that we, as science teachers, want the students to be able to leave the class with which includes not only the content, but the skills and attitudes that are part of the alberta program of studies. clifford and friesen (2006) asked, “what can happen in schools when teachers take seriously the power and the right of children to name and to shape their experience of the world?” (p. 94) what would have happened if that student teacher had the opportunity to explore the biological issues that the tsunami has brought forth? hopefully, some students would have understood why biology is an essential discipline in order to live well in this world what gadamer (1996) calls “being in the world as a wakeful presence” (p. 74). references aikenhead, g. s. (2003). review of research on humanistic perspectives in science curricula. paper presented at the european science education research association, noordwijkerhout, the netherlands. http://www.usask.ca/education/people/aiken head/esera_2.pdf alberta education (2009). biology 20/30 program of studies. edmonton, ab, canada: alberta education. blades, d.w. (2001). the simulacra of science education. in j.a. weaver, m. morris, & p. appelbaum (eds.), (post)modern science (education): propositions and alternative paths (pp. 57-94). new york, ny: peter lang. capra, f. (1996). the web of life: a new scientific understanding of living systems. new york, ny: anchor books. caputo, j.d. (1987). radical hermeneutics. bloomington & indianapolis, in: indiana university press. crease, r. p. (1997). hermeneutics and the natural sciences: introduction. man and world, 30, 259-270. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. pelech journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 1 8 new york, ny: state university of new york. dewey, j. (1902). the child and the curriculum. chicago il: the university of chicago press. donnelly, j. (2002). instrumentality, hermeneutics and the place of science in the school curriculum. science & education, 11, 135153. friesen, s., & clifford, p. (2003). hard fun: teaching and learning for the twenty-first century. in d. jardine, s. friesen, & p. clifford, back to the basics of teaching and learning: thinking the world together (pp. 89-107). mahwah, nj: lawrence erlbaum. gadamer, h.g. (1988). rhetoric, hermeneutics, and the critique of ideology. in k. mueller-vollmer (ed.), the hermeneutics reader (pp. 274-292). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h.g. (1992). the university of heidelberg and the birth of modern science (l. schmidt & m. reuss, trans.). in d. misgeld & g. nicholson (eds.), hansgeorg gadamer on education, poetry, and history. albany, ny: state university of new york press. gadamer, h.g. (1996). the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age. palo alto, ca: stanford university press. gadamer, h.g. (2004). truth and method (j. w. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans., 2nd ed.). new york, ny: continuum. goldstein, j. (2011, march). it’s not a book of knowledge…it’s a journey. keynote presentation conducted at the national science teachers association conference, san francisco, california. jardine, d. (2006). on hermeneutics: “what happens to us over and above our wanting and doing.” in k. tobin & j. kincheloe (eds.), doing educational research: a handbook (pp. 269-289). amsterdam, the netherlands: sense. kozoll, r. h., & osborne, m. d. (2004). finding meaning in science: lifeworld, identity, and self. science education, 88(2), 157-181. lyons, t. (2006). different countries, same science classes: students' experiences of school science in their own words. international journal of science education, 28(6), 591-613. mccomas, w. f. (1998). the principal elements of the nature of science: dispelling the myths. in w. f. mccomas (ed.), the nature of science in science education (pp. 53-70). dordrecht, the netherlands: kluwer academic publishers. orr, d.w. (2004). earth in mind: on education, environment, and the human prospect. washington, dc: 96island press. smith, d. g. (1991). hermeneutic inquiry: the hermeneutic imagination and the pedagogic text. in e. c. short (ed.), forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 187-209). albany, ny: state university of new york press. microsoft word jardineproof2.docx corresponding author: david w. jardine faculty of education, university of calgary, calgary, ab t2n 1n4 email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 12, 2012 the author(s) 2012 “the memories of childhood have no order and no end”: pedagogical reflections on the occasion of the release, on october 9th 2009, of the re-mastered version of the beatles’ sergeant pepper’s lonely hearts club band. david w. jardine “the memories of childhood have no order, and no end.” from dylan thomas’s (1954, p. 8) reminiscences of childhood we are no longer able to approach this like an object of knowledge, grasping, measuring and controlling. rather than meeting us in our world, it is much more a world into which we ourselves are drawn. [it] possesses its own worldliness and, thus, the center of its own being so long as it is not placed into the objectworld of producing and marketing. the being of this thing cannot be accessed by objectively measuring and estimating; rather, the totality of a lived context has entered into and is present in the thing. and we belong to it as well. our orientation to it is always something like our orientation to an inheritance that this thing belongs to, be it from a stranger’s life or from our own. from hans-georg gadamer (1994, p. 192), heidegger’s ways. reminiscence i all this is certainly more than twenty years ago today. grade 11 english class, winter 1967, some time after february 2, 1967. i’m mentioning this because i still remember that date, february 2, 1967, was when i first heard the latest beatles single, penny lane/strawberry fields forever, over an american am radio station that crackled its way to southern ontario, to burlington, one evening whose details are lost to memory. was it wbz from boston? and how we stood in doug’s rec-room, amazed, wondering whether we were actually hearing what we thought, or whether the radio was blurring in and out of the winter snowstatic, like old tv reception. good vibrations the previous fall of ’66 was strange enough. now this? what is this? part of it was the vertigo tremble of being near-17 in oh-so-fortunate days such as those and sensing all around secret and hidden worlds impending. glimmer of a sort of aufklarung with its double german roots of “enlightenment” and also “clearing up.” some lit cracks “break forth” (gadamer 1989, p. 458) in those clouds of winter static. openings. opportunity. possibilities, and “thereby possible ways of shaping our lives” (gadamer, 1986, p. 59). there. “through the recess, the chalk and numbers” (wilson & parks 1966). something secret. (“yo-da-lay-ee-who,” jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 2 sung right over that song-line). sometime in late-february that year, in our grade 11 english class, we were given reminiscences of childhood by dylan thomas to read with the horrifying and boring prospect of discussing it in the days to come. (school not yet ever experienced as a place of schola: “leisure,” and a place of "a holding back, a keeping clear” [oed]). unexpected, then, in reading this for school, this happens. i seem to already know intimately of this place of reminiscence. i “recognize [myself] in the mess of th[is] world” (hillman 1983, p. 49). how did this welshman know this of me? was i spotted unawares when i was lingering there? (aufklarung is not simply becoming conscious of threads in the world, but becoming, in all its myriad, self-conscious—not just spotting but being spotted, and spotting that, experiencing that i am experienced by others, that i am visible). dylan thomas has experienced me and now seems to write down heretofore secret trails of what i am. images of flying, in memory: over the trees of the everlasting park, where a brass band shakes the leaves and sends them showing down on to the nurses and the children, the cripples and the idlers, the gardeners and the shouting boys. (thomas, 1954, p. 8) and these specific streets, “inkerman street, sebastopol street” (p. 8), names whose very specificity made them both tangible and imaginable. nearby recesses. my self being formed right there, in front of me. like bankers, sitting, waiting, midst pictures of possible trims, straightrazor foamed clean-cut around the ears. and there, a “fireman turning off the hose and standing in the wet” (thomas, 1954a, p. 15) (safely rushed in from the pouring rain), from “a child’s christmas in wales” (which i quickly read next back then and not at all for school). very strange. nurses, imagined in memory with poppies in a tray in the park with old men and brass bands, my own old “dame school . . .so firm and kind smelling of galoshes, with the sweet and fumbled music of the piano lessons drifting down from upstairs to the lonely schoolroom” (thomas, 1954, p. 7). lakeshore public school, built in 1923, red brick, facing lake ontario, “the singing sea” (p. 8) where by grade six we’d smoke stolen cigarettes and meet at the water’s lap edge, a “world within the world [into which we are drawn]” (p. 4), “secret” (p. 4), housing “its own, even sacred, seriousness” (gadamer 1989, p. 102). “a space specially marked out and reserved” (gadamer, 1989, p. 107). “this is for us, not for the 'others'. what the 'others' do 'outside' is of no concern to us at the moment. we are different, we do things differently" (huizinga, 1955, p. 12): and a packet of cigarettes: you put one in your mouth and you stood at the corner of the street and you waited for hours, in vain, for an old lady to scold you for smoking [“a world wholly closed within itself, it is as if open toward the spectator in whom it achieves its whole significance” (gadamer, 1989, p. 109)]. (thomas, 1954a, p. 17) good heavens, there it is: “the wild boys innocent as strawberries” (1954, p. 6). what am i going to do with this secret? (“every game presents the [one] who plays it with a task” (gadamer, 1989, p. 107). jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 3 i ended up, of course, humming along in our grade 11 class as i read about hunchbacks and how “the boys made the tigers jump out of their eyes,” (thomas, 1954 p. 6) and “the smell of fish and chips on saturday evenings” (p. 7) (tethered later to even more dirty-secret beatle pies). and our teacher asking me about the humming song, and me telling him about penny lane and strawberry fields and how this reminiscence we were reading sounds so familiar, and him getting one of those purple smelly gestetner™ machine mimeograph sheets and telling me to take it home and type out the lyrics. and i did. and our teacher copied it out. and we looked there and then and long and hard into the deep face of the world that some of us were actually already secretly living in. ear whisper. remembered thus, our teacher to me: “you need to read more dylan thomas.” this is what he said in truth but it may not be what he actually said. i can’t quite remember but i remember it as clear as day, that invitation out of yet back into childhood sleepiness, out of and yet back into to play. and then. four months later, june 1 1967, a month to go before school is finally out, k. p. and i go into hamilton’s west end, kensington mall (a name worthy of wales or liverpool) to a record store, and buy sergeant pepper’s lonely hearts club band. not right away, but slowly, soon, there, some recognition, right above and between marlon brando and tom mix, themselves above the madame tussaud’s wax figures of the beatles reminisced from 1964. there. a round and unmistakable puffytousled face in black and white. there! dylan thomas. reminiscence ii we do not understand what recognition is in its profoundest nature if we only regard it as knowing something again that we know already i.e., what is familiar is recognized again. the joy of recognition is rather the joy of knowing more than is already familiar. in recognition what we know emerges, as if illuminated, from all the contingent and variable circumstances that condition it (gadamer, 1989, p. 114). the joy of recognition. the joy of knowing more. in blurry retrospect, this is the first time i remember having the experience of actually knowing something, of actually having read something “right” up out of my own according life. the pedagogy of this is important and almost intractable. “over and above our wanting and doing,” things sometimes “happen to us” (gadamer, 1989, p. xxviii). this, of course, is an insight long in coming and points to why i still remember this event, still call it to mind and make something of it, again and again, in such callings. “every repetition is as original as the work itself” (gadamer, 1989, p. 122). there are adventures in the world, secret places that will yield those secrets if i care to venture and do what the place requires of me when i arrive. our teacher seemingly “ignor[ing] the orthodox who labor so patiently trying to eliminate the apocryphal variants from the one true text. there is no one true version of which all the others are but copies or distortions. every version belongs” (thompson, 1981, pp. 11-12). a conspiracy, a common breath. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 4 it is as if i was, all those years ago, presented with a task that was wedded to a prospect, a promise, that settling here will bring unexpected yield, that staying here has a future (linked somehow to reminiscence, to a past’s future that is remarkably “standing” still “in a horizon of … still undecided future possibilities” [gadamer, 1989, p. 112]). still. this is how stillness anticipates. stillare “to drip, drop” (o.e.d.). every version belongs: “interweaving and crisscrossing" (wittgenstein, 1968, p. 36). undergoing an “increase in being” (gadamer, 1989, p. 40) in such interweaving. slowly becoming what it is. slowly become who i have become. crisscrossing. it would be a mistake for me to portray that june 1967 event simply as some thunderbolt flash of some sort of full illumination at the time in the mind and life of a 16 year old. i’ve since read of gadamer’s teacher, martin heidegger, and his oft-used image of lightning, where a territory gets suddenly illuminated and gathers into a place, a topos, a “topic” (see, e.g., caputo 1982, p. 195). this idea of an opening or clearing or field (see friesen & jardine, 2009) that suddenly opens up and illuminates, has long since haunted me. see, too, gadamer (1989, p. 21), on topica and the young needing images, like nurses selling poppies, for the formation of their memory. all this is of that reminiscence. slow emergence. flash and then slow glowing arrives, but only if i take on as my own the work of remembering. hermeneutics is a practice. an earthly sort of aufklarung. “you should read more dylan thomas” as a call to prayer, to practice, with a promise that something will yield through patience and “a continuity of attention and devotion” (berry, 1986, p 32). hermeneutics as an ecological practice. all the work i’ve come to do starts here, at this absent origin. after all, “understanding begins when something addresses us,” (gadamer, 1989, p. 299), but it only begins there. reading a child’s christmas in wales was compelled as a way to continue to remain in the same place and cultivate it a bit more, as is writing this paper, a gathering that is also a whiling (jardine, 2008), like the festive (gadamer, 1989, pp. 122-123) 09-09-09 release of the re-mastered sergeant pepper’s lonely hearts club band, its date echoing a white album yet to come back in early 1967. and, just to foolishly rub this wound, we are dealing with an event which itself was already about memory and reminiscence, in and of wales boyhoods, in and of liverpool streets and orphanages, in sound and shiny brass band accordances in edwardian suits, young men singing, in 1967, about being 64 (and how i’m now actually three years away!) and me, at that time, 16 going on 17, beginning to feel full-fledge the reminiscent pull of my own life, my own imagined childhood, now clearly ago, and slowly, slowly, drip-drop, becoming the sort of perhaps-never-was that i can henceforth live with remembering and recognizing thus. “to reconcile [my]self with [my]self, to recognize oneself in other being” (gadamer 1989, p. 13). it has taken years for that event to become what it was. read that again. it has taken years for that event to become what it was. what it is “what really happened back then in that english class or that ride to kensington mall?” becomes a more and more trivial question, because the question that drives here is “what has become of it?” even asking “what really happened?” is itself a formative act. this is how jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 5 memory works, because memory doesn’t just store information: it does work, and its workings are how it shapes the one remembering. this is why memory is always someone’s: whoever uses his memory as a mere faculty and any “technique” of memory is such a use does not yet possess it as something that is absolutely [one’s] own. memory must be formed; for memory is not memory of anything and everything. one has a memory for some things, and not for others; one wants to preserve one thing in memory and banish another. “keeping in mind” is ambiguous (gadamer, 1989, pp. 15-16). indeed it is. this ambiguity hides an oftensecreted mechanism of becoming myself right at the very moment when contingent and variable circumstances both fall away and gather up into illuminating recognition all at once. look there. wild boys, innocent. ambiguous, this keeping in mind. so, that “past” event’s eventfulness is recurrently experienced as “a task that is never entirely finished” (gadamer, 1989, p. 301). after all, here we are, writer and reader, 44 years on, still struggling with how and whether to learn to live with the entreaties of this event. “by forming the thing [i] form [my]self” (gadamer, 1989, p. 13), and by informing, now, in this writing, i set out for readers a gentle pedagogical demand on thinking, on memory formation and its ways. this: that “every word breaks forth” (gadamer, 1989, p. 458) thus. shush! this is the hermeneutic secret regarding pedagogy. every seeminglymoribund thread of every program of studies for every grade (and even grade 11 english class now 44 years ago) has secrets such as these, reminiscences to be had in the leisure of schooling. reminiscence iii spiel: origin: 1890–95; (noun) < german spiel or yiddish shpil play, game; (v.) < german spielen or yiddish shpiln to play, gamble. (www.dictionary.reference.com) and become in english parlance, in the great imac desktop dictionary definition: “a long or fast speech or story, typically intended as a means of persuasion or as an excuse but regarded with contempt or skepticism by those who hear it.” wild schoolboy ruses, then, little persuasions or excuses or deceits needed to make our way in the world down by lake-lap edge. but still, we secretly knew, i secretly knew that “something is going on, (im spiele ist), something is happening (sich abspielt)” (gadamer, 1989, p. 104). that’s why i ended up reading a child’s christmas in wales in short order back then, simply and only because the beatles fan in me seemed to have already read it. that, i expect (or, actually, hope in retrospect), is why our teacher ventured like he did. risking the wild that turned out to not only reveal but also revive a deep and hidden civility, an emergent culturedness (bildung) in that uprising that can save the world (of grade 11 english) from its too-often over-schooled moroseness. because the world is made by mortals it wears out; and because it continuously changes its inhabitants it runs the risk of becoming as mortal as they. to preserve the world against the mortality of its creators and inhabitants it must be constantly set right anew. the problem is simply to educate in such a way that a settingright remains actually possible, even though it can, of course, never be assured. our hope always hangs on the new which every generation brings. (arjardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 6 endt, 1969, p. 192) a triple rescue in this setting-right. thomas’s reminiscences of childhood is rescued from its moribund locale in the english grade 11 program of studies, that overloaded canon. it is awakened. beatles rescued from pop-culture momentariness. and me finding a place of comfort for my own awakening, finding my own strength strengthened, housed and cared for in the common embrace of these welsh and liverpool worlds. as i become myself, i also become unalone in this becoming. handed, and handed over to, an inheritance. both and always “in between” (gadamer, 1989, p. 109). all at once spotting and spotted. a great ecological convergence at the heart of coming to know. this, then, is the pedagogical task, working this out and thus working out a life. and in this working, preserving the world from the mortality of its creators and inhabitants while all that while becoming more and more mortal. “pathei mathos: learning through suffering” (gadamer, 1989, p. 356). reminiscence iv “something awakens our interest that is really what comes first!” (gadamer, 2001, p. 50). something awakens. something clears. aufklarung. the lane was always the place to tell your secrets; if you did not have any, you invented them. occasionally now i dream that i am turning out of school into the lane of confidences when i say to the boys of my class, “at last, i have a real secret.” “what is it what is it?” “i can fly.” and when they do no believe me, i flap my arms and slowly leave the ground only a few inches at first, then, gaining air until i fly waving my cap level with the upper windows of the school, peering in until the mistress at the piano screams and the metronome falls to the ground and stops, and there is no more time. (thomas, 1954, pp. 7-8) it is odd to have steeped meaning, wonderfully, both “soaked” and “softened” (o.e.d)-so long in this lane of confidences, these images, roiling back and forth in intimate relations of “responding and summoning” (gadamer, 1989, p. 458), of me being summoner and then summoned some, responding and feeling waves of resistance and response, memory and lapse, formative, shaping. glimpses of “the unsaid” (p. 458). you see, i could have sworn, starting this paper, that dylan thomas’ nurses in the park had poppies. they do not. and that there was an orphanage in wales, wasn’t there, like strawberry field in wild boy days in liverpool? no. thus i, too, have a secret. a new idea is never only a wind-fall, an apple to be eaten. it takes hold of us as much as we take hold of it. the hunch that breaks in pulls one into an identification with it. we feel gifted, inspired, upset, because the message is also a messenger that makes demands, calling us to . . .fly out. (hillman, 2005, p. 99) and when they do not believe me, i write my way down lanes of confidences. this is the secret. this reminiscent world is my first memory of a genuinely hermeneutic experience. such “experience has its proper fulfillment not in definitive jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 7 knowledge but in the openness to experience that is made possible by experience itself” (gadamer, 1989, p. 355). because i’ve dwelt in this territory for so many years, it has ripened such that i am now more susceptible to its summoning. “[this world] compels over and over, and the better one knows it, the more compelling it is. this is not a matter of mastering an area of study” (gadamer, 2007, p. 115) and yet it is something of ripe pedagogy at its best. something in me keeps expecting to see hans-georg gadamer’s face one day on that re-mastered record sleeve “record sleeve,” itself, of course, a reminiscence. a “have no end” the world, too, needs protection to keep it from being overrun and destroyed by the onslaught of the new that burst upon it with each new generation. (arendt, 1969, pp. 185-6) you all know that as a beginner one comes to find everything questionable, for that is the privilege of youth to seek everywhere the novel and new possibilities. one then learns slowly how a large amount must be excluded in order to finally arrive at the point where one finds the truly open questions and therefore the possibilities that exist. (gadamer, 1986, p. 59) “the memories of childhood have no order, and no end” (thomas, 1954, p. 8). but dylan thomas knew clearly of a secret order in the park, by the water’s lake lap, in the old woman’s scold. that ecological scold of wildness that comes in response to wild erupts, as simple, sometimes, as innocent boys humming tunes in school. or little children who laugh behind the backs of bankers. “to find free spaces and learn to move therein” (gadamer, 1986, p. 59). real possibilities that might just open up unseen unsaid worlds (“even though it can, of course, never be assured” [arendt, 1969, p. 192]). to re-cite: “and thereby possible ways of shaping our lives” (gadamer, 1986, p. 59), even though such shaping can never be assured. so, here’s to miraculous happenstance, the remembered ventures of a teacher, and the great lack of assurance that underwrites pedagogy at its best. i know that this age-old experience of being drawn into a world and finding myself already there is one that has been and remains a steadfast refuge and path of my own work, and a key to what i hope can happen in schools. here’s another small secret that isn’t much of a secret. it’s not just a hope. i’ve seen something of it happen in many dame schools, firm and kind. at least, that is what i remember through this recess of reminiscence. and when they do not believe me, i flap my arms and write out of the joy of recognition. the best news of all in this vague season is remembering such events and chancing to see their kin bubble up in kind in the lives of students and teachers. it has allowed me to still feel a bit of a wild boy, still somehow innocent as strawberries. bragg creek, alberta, december 21-31, 2011 jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 8 bio david w. jardine, phd, is a professor in the faculty of education, university of calgary. references arendt, h. (1969). between past and future: eight exercises in political thought. new york, ny: penguin books. caputo, j. (1982). heidegger and aquinas: an essay on overcoming metaphysics. new york, ny: fordham university press. friesen, s., & jardine, d. (2009). on field(ing) knowledge. in s. goodchild & b. sriraman (eds.), relatively and philosophically e[a]rnest: festschrifte in honour of paul ernest’s 65th birthday. the montana mathematics enthusiast: monograph series in mathematics education (pp. 149-175). charlotte, nc: information age publishing. gadamer, h. g. (1986). the idea of the university--yesterday, today, tomorrow. in d. misgeld & g. nicholson (eds. & trans.), hans-georg gadamer on education, poetry, and history: applied hermeneutics (pp. 47-62). albany, ny: suny press. gadamer, h. g. (1989). truth and method. new york: continuum books. gadamer, h. g. (1994). heidegger’s ways. boston: mit press. gadamer, h.g. (2007). from word to concept: the task of hermeneutics as philosophy. in r. palmer (ed. & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 108-122). evanston, il: northwestern university press. hillman, j. (1983). healing fiction. barrytown, n.y.: station hill press. hillman, j. (2005). notes on opportunism. in james hillman (2005), senex and puer (pp. 96-112). putnam, ct: spring publications. huizinga, j. (1955). homo ludens: a study of the play element in culture. boston, ma: the beacon press. jardine, d. (in press). on the while of things. forthcoming in d. jardine, pedagogy left in peace. new york, ny: continuum books. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 1 9 online etymological dictionary (o.e.d.). access december 26, 2011 at: http://www.etymonline.com. thomas, d. (1954). reminiscences of childhood. in d. thomas, quite early one morning. new york, ny: new directions paperbook, p. 3-8. thomas, d. (1954a). a child’s christmas in wales. in d. thomas (1954). quite early one morning (pp. 14-21). new york: new directions paperbook. thompson, w. i. (1981). the time falling bodies take to light: mythology, sexuality and the origin of culture. new york, ny: st. martin's press. wilson, b., & parks, v. d. (1966). wonderful. lyrics by v. d. parks, © warner/chappell music, inc., universal music publishing group. wittgenstein, l. (1968). philosophical investigations. cambridge, uk: blackwell’s. corre s ponding author: galicia s. blackman email: galicia.blackman@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics july 5, 2016 the author(s) 2016 secrets in the open: an exercise in interpretive writing galicia s. blackman abstract in this paper i present an exemplar of interpretive writing based on my engagement with the movie, my life as a dog. the film is a series of vignettes about ingemar, a young boy, who is processing the events which arise from the difficulties wrought by his mother’s illness. this is not the typical coming of age film where the child becomes an adult through the initiation into life’s painful circumstances. the film ends with the character still in his boyhood. nevertheless, the intermittent voice-over conveys the impression that ingemar is narrating in retrospect, in a build up to his emergence from a state of innocence to awareness, and acceptance of pain and loss. i attended to the principles of hermeneutic practice outlined by several scholars to frame my understanding of what it means to enter the hermeneutic circle to explore the topic which addressed me: secrecy. keywords secrets, hermeneutic circle, childhood, interpretive writing preface this interpretive response to the film, my life as a dog, was a requirement of coursework in a hermeneutic research course i was taking in my graduate studies. i approached the task with some concern over the similarities between hermeneutic research and literary analysis. however, as i proceeded with the activity, i noticed where i was straddling two ways of thinking: the way that i would normally instruct my literature students to respond to art in order to write the literary essay and what i came to recognize as the hermeneutic sensibility. there is an blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 2 interconnectedness between these two ways of thinking but as i often tell my students: poetry, drama, and prose, are types of literature, constructed from the same building blocks but each is distinguishable as a particular art form. coming to hermeneutics as a novice, it is easy to be naïve and say, “it is just about interpretation” but i would argue it is about a kind of interpretation and one needs to be clear about the nature of that interpretation before calling it hermeneutics. i am grateful to dr. nancy moules and dr. graham mccaffrey whose comprehensive course on hermeneutic research helped me understand what it means to come to hermeneutic thinking and writing, and that ultimately, hermeneutics is practice-oriented. the film, my life as a dog, is centred around the twelve-year protagonist ingemar who lives with his mother and older brother. he gets into trouble easily and when his mother gently admonishes him for his quirkiness, he notices that she is ill. the film is crafted through a series of scenes which capture the chronology of the events leading up to ingemar’s unde rstanding that his mother has passed away. that chronologically is interspersed with short clips which function like flashbacks to a period of an idyllic time shared between ingemar and his mother. that recurring flashback with ingemar and his mother, laughing and talking, in a scene evocative of a summer day near a lake, is a contrast to the chronology of the film, where we see the mother deteriorating physically. the flashback also contrasts the increasing distance in the relationship between ingemar and his ailing mother. when the mother is getting ill to the point where she needs rest and she cannot parent well enough, ingemar and his brother are sent to live with relatives for a while and his beloved dog is reportedly sent to a kennel. throughout the film, he and his brother are moved around a bit, though not always together, and that creates a picture of a young boy tossed around, disconnected from his closest family members. ingemar goes to live with his uncle in a village with a mix of peculiar characters. it serves to distract him for a while, but when he returns to live with his mother and brother, the mother is obviously, chronically ill. the absence of his dog also serves to awaken his innocence. however, it is a while before ingemar comes to understand the painful reality. when he does, his uncle and the new relationships he has formed in the village, help him to attain a measure of peace and tranquility. secrets in the open in my caution to avoid succumbing to the inclination to respond to this film in the way that i would typically respond when conducting literary analysis, i tried to avoid the themes and motifs which were likely to evoke that kind of response. it was awkward to view the film and attempt to silence the jargon which most clearly helps me arrive at a deeper understanding. i cou ld not shut off that prejudice. that would have been counterhermeneutic. however, when i am with my niece and nephew (ages nine and eleven), i am not a language teacher. for the period of play with them, i inhabit a twelve-year old sensibility until my adult status is required. so for this task i did not seek to shut off my prejudices. instead i asked, what would my childlike self see? i kept waiting for sickan to reappear because i have a soft spot for creatures of the canine persuasion (a partiality from childhood). gadamer pointed to the paradox of the hermeneutic impulse that gets the inquiry rolling along, that “individual explorations necessarily start from the very limited experiences and fields of blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 3 experiences” (1976, p. 18). my understanding is that hermeneutics, as interpretive inquiry, begins in the address of the familiar. jardine stated that interpretive inquiry is concerned with “the generativity of meaning that comes with the eruption of the new in the midst of the already familiar” (1992, pp. 51-52). when sickan failed to appear and i felt the familiar heartbreak of the loss of a beloved animal, in addition to all the other cha llenges facing ingemar, i started to notice the other instances where information was withheld from him. i began to wonder about the secrets in the film and i began to ponder even further, when does secrecy cease to be deception and when does it take on a poignant or dangerous overtone? as i mentally pulled out the instances of secrecy, i had to pause. i was on the verge of looking for a pattern in the examples and i would likely proceed to a conclusion as i am wont to do for literature. at that rate, i wou ld never enter the hermeneutic circle. however, if hermeneutic inquiry begins in data saturation (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015, p. 83), then i needed to look more closely at the examples of secrecy in the film and i found several. address of the topic i almost abandoned secrets because i thought i would have preferred an easier topic. i wanted to pursue something more familiar, more evocative, such as the rustic environment and the eccentricities of the characters. i was trying not to conduct literary analysis and uncertain that i had the hermeneutic tools at hand, i doubted whether i should follow the trail. however, gadamer cautioned that “avoiding misunderstanding cannot be regarded as the specific task of hermeneutics” (palmer, 2007, p. 87). i am beginning to see what caputo implied about the discomfort that initiates hermeneutic work, the paralysis that compels one to proceed with the topic (moules et al., 2015, p. xii). the topic was not allowing itself to unfold unless i did the work but it was preventing me from seeing anything else. the secrets did not have patterns and i had indecisions about what i construed as secrets in the film. there it was, the topic, in all its discomforting nakedness: what understandings about secrets are evoked from viewing this film? what meanings are confirmed and challenged by my understanding of secrecy? secrets have a peculiar association with childhood and i had deliberately entered a childlike sensibility when viewing the film. i wondered about when do we stop saying “let me tell you a secret” and begin saying, “can i take you into confidence about something” and how we go about distinguishing between lies and secrets. when does the word evoke something pleasurable and when does it veer into taboo terrain? up until this inquiry, secrets had been relegated to the sentiment moules et al. captured with the recognition that “when a term becomes widely assumed and taken for granted, it starts to slip away from us, unnoticed in plain sight like a comfortable pair of shoes” (2015, p. 152). i felt that i did not know enough about secrets to conduct an interpretive analysis of the topic. there was the literary analyst rearing its head. the term is familiar so i was not sure why i had trepidations. who among us has not used the phrase “it’s a secret” with awareness of the associations the phrase evokes? it is sometimes accompanied by the exclamatory “shh” or the imperative to be hushed. secrets are about the unknown, but they are distinguishable from mysteries because somewhere, someone “knows” the secret. some definitions give the term associations with concepts of exclusion, concealment, privacy, and division. blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 4 i looked at book titles and the contexts where the term tends to be used. there were selfhelp books which offered to reveal the secrets to staying healthy or beautiful or young; there were other kinds of selfhelp books about the secrets to human behaviors or success; the whistleblowers who put out secrets that institutions, companies, and governments do not want you to know; the secret “truth” about ancient societies or ways of living different from what we know; secrets of the animal kingdoms; advice books for children about secrets that they should share; notions of secrets in romantic relationships and domestic contexts; secrets in health, employment, or academic situations. (i discovered that i really wanted to know the ancient secrets of the horse’s mind in a way that i had never known that i wanted to.) then there were books on secrets to writing pape rs and dissertations, but none on the secrets to hermeneutic interpretations of film. even caputo declared that he has not been given access to some big capitalized know-it-all “secret” in hermeneutic practice (2000, p. 1). the term secret is seductive a nd suggestive of something profound, special, and classified. attach the word “secret” to anything and it takes on proportions of grandeur. secrets are everywhere. at that point in the inquiry i could not tell if secrets were really in our everyday parlance or the topic was digging into my psyche to the exclusion of everything else. gadamer described what resembles my understanding of the address, “we are possessed by something and precisely by means of it we are opened up for the new, the different, the tr ue” (palmer, 2007, p. 82). entering the hermeneutic circle in moules et al., the hermeneutic circle is characterized as having two important stances: entering the circle, which is accomplished by responding to the call of the topic, and staying within the circle which entails discipline and rigor (2015, p. 122). to enter the circle, i had to phrase the question appropriately, with the hermeneutic nuance, and i had to look at the data, or the events in the film which offered insight about secrecy. what understandings about secrets did the events in this film reveal? i came to understand the rigor required of me as the care which one gives to the topic looking at data as a whole, the topic, and data in part, which is a particular instance (moules et al., 2015, p. 122). i collated the instances of secrecy which were most revelatory about the topic. several occasions in the film had secretive tones: the opening scene; the mother’s medical condition; the bed-wetting scene; the secret spot under the train track where he spends time with his best friend; the story he relates of his father has nuances of secrets concerning his father’s fate; the lingerie magazine which mr. arvidsson hides and pulls ingemar into his secret by asking him to read from it; the footballergirl’s hidden puberty, and sickan, who got this all started for me. the repetition in the voice-over “i should have told her everything while she still had the strength” is framed as a boy mourning the loss of a relationship and wishing that he had shared exotic stories with his mother. however, the ambiguity of “i should have told” is a phrase often associated with or evocative of secrecy. that voice-over phrase which is replayed several times in the film, reinforces the tones of secrecy surrounding the events in ingemar’s life. the opening scene comes across as a revelation of a secret. ingemar’s uncle has difficulty being blunt and escapes from having to tell what needs to be stated directly by declaring that ingemar blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 5 knows already. he apologizes for having been unable to tell ingemar something which he seems forced to acknowledge at that moment. the film then unravels as a series of flashbacks which culminate in that point of the opening revelation. ingemar’s voice-over has the distant tone of the character played throughout the story, avoiding being blunt about the challenges he is facing and displaying coping mechanisms that seem a little odd. by the end of the film, positioning the opening scene becomes clearer. the revelation is about ingemar’s mo ther who has quite likely succumbed to her illness and it occurs right about the time that ingemar accepts that sickan will not be returning either. in my literary analyst mode, i would normally linger on the dramatic irony that the audience knows the mother is terminally ill from the first indication of disease, in the classic trope of juxtaposing childhood innocence and the coming to awareness of the unpleasantries of life which are archetypal initiation points. dramatic irony is a kind of secrecy from t he character, shared between the audience and the narrative structures. a hermeneutic inquiry asks something different of me. what does the secrecy around the mother’s illness suggest about secrecy? people are often secretive about their medical issues, even when these issues are not threatening to others. there is a social consensus that children are shielded from the bare facts of medical knowledge especially if that knowledge can disrupt their innocence. we believe in the importance of keeping children insulated from harsh realities and keeping secrets about medical difficulties in family members is a societal norm. that secrecy is usually also seen in financial matters and family disputes. the assumptions underlying these secrets is the societal consensus that children are not emotionally mature enough to handle tough experiences. perhaps certain events inevitably lean toward secrecy where children are concerned. there are at least two other instances of secrecy where it appears that children are protec ted from suffering. ingemar’s father is a mysterious feature of the film. we do not know exactly where he is and ingemar’s story sounds like a carefully crafted narrative given to him to protect him from the truth. this element of the film led me to consider how secrets are distinguishable from mysteries. can i say definitively that the father’s status is a secret? not quite. it resembles what i associate with secrecy: the unknown, a bizarre story, a failure to appear, but this element seems to linger in mystery. there is no concrete revelation which confirms my suspicion about the secrecy surrounding the father’s status. yet the frequent references to him suggest that his absence is a revelation of some kind. the other event which seems to protect ingemar from suffering is the absence of information about sickan. like ingemar, we are given a story about what will happen to sickan: he will be cared for in a kennel. however, the adults have not been forthcoming about what seems obvious to the audience, the mother is dying. is it possible that sickan’s fate is being kept a secret from ingemar to avoid hurting him further? that led me to consider that our understandings of secrets are often on the cusp of deception. there is no overt revelation about the dog’s fate, much like the status of his father but that does not diminish the element of secrecy. the uncle’s reluctance to respond to ingemar’s request to follow up on the dog is a kind of revelation. the other instances of secrecy had distinctive qualities which made it difficult to see a pattern in secrecy in the film. there, the flux of hermeneutic inquiry was giving me a dose of what it means to suspend my expectation and go where the data led me. the bed-wetting scene and the manner blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 6 in which the boys tried to keep it a secret from the mother shed understanding on the element of secrecy that sometimes it is done to protect the self. others would consider it lying especially when one admits that the outcome of the revelation would mean some distress or discomfort for the keepers of the secret. the secret spot under the train track where ingemar spends time with his best friend is the poignant kind of secret, which is used to build intimacy, strengthen relationships, and there are no obvious risks. the lingerie magazine which mr. arvidsson hides and then he pulls ingemar into his secret asking him to read from it; the footballer-girl’s hidden puberty which pulls ingemar into complicity with her secrecy, also contain those nuances of the nature of secrecy, fostering closeness with others. the recurring voice-over, the image of ingemar in the summer house which looks like a kennel, the framing metaphor of the title, that ingemar is bumped around without being told much by the adult world, all evoke his similarity to being a family pet, a dog, loved and cared for but somewhat distant from the goings-on of the human world. secrecy fosters that distance. some of that distance is ingemar’s doing, because he declares that one ought to have perspective, but much of it is the adult world holding the child at bay. secrets are the adults’ ways of ensuring things do not get too out of control. considering ingemar’s odd little habits (such as his inability to drink from a glass when stressed) and the possibility that his childhood could be traumatized by the truth of what was transpiring, secrets seem like an expedient way of managing the situation. this raises even more questions: how do we use secrets to manage difficult situations and when do secrets become inflammatory in t hose situations? ingemar felt unloved, unwanted by his mother but it was obvious to the audience that she was just too ill to parent lovingly. the secrecy surrounding the gravity of her condition could have had the effect of isolating ingemar. secrets can create distance even when intended to mollify difficult situations. yet even though we “know” that, in some situations, it might even be an instinct to keep secrets to avoid hurting others. in trying to find the right voice or the appropriate language to clearly describe the understanding of the topic generated in the process as is recommended in moules et al. (2015, p. 122), i turned to the personal. last month when my mother “revealed” that she had ungone a medical procedure and the results came back fine, my first reaction was “why didn’t you tell me you were going to do it” and her response was simply that she did not want me to worry. that silenced me because she was right; i would worry because i do not handle medical issues very well. i was grateful for her secrecy and there i saw the instinct to shield others from discomfort as the adults tried to shield ingemar. secrets are by nature multilayered with meaning, never one thing or the other. considering ingemar’s stories and meanings of “secrets” whic h emphasize separation, one can see how secrets in lived experience are capable of divisiveness and effect hurt. conversely, in some of ingemar’s stories they engender comfort and intimacy. within the interpretive process secrets are fodder for the hermeneutic practice. they are about something. there is a phenomenon in the middle of it. they emerge from relationships. people have secrets from others. even though it is one individual holding the secret away from another ind ividual, there is an element of declaration to the self about the secrecy. the language we use to talk about secrets imbues them with inherent preciousness. we “guard” and “keep safe” the secrets, but that blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 7 language can just as easily turn dark with “don’t say a word” and “be quiet” although each instance has its own flavor. secrets have a dialogical element: there is something which is kept, yearning to be shared in conversation with another. secrets can even have a diabolical element when they are used to sever connections instead of building intimacy. when they are perceived as willful deceptions they lose any magic they could have had. when they are used to con and exploit, they become toxic. secrecy can veer into meanings of deception and lying. to be on the side of the unknown can sometimes be a case of protection from an unpleasantry but it can also be seen a dark phenomenon when the unknown and subsequent “reveal” is dangerous or done carelessly. fortunately for the character, ingemar, the relevant revelations which induced deep hurt were buffered by a new life surrounded by gentle caring characters. this inquiry led me to consider the psychology of secrecy. i conducted a search for literature on the topic, perhaps in an impulse to conduct the dialo gue that is necessary when one is within the hermeneutic circle and i was on the verge of proceeding to what looked like a literature review when i encountered bellman’s the paradox of secrecy. then i recognized i was in a potentially dangerous zone of over immersion and i felt the tug of what jardine referred to as “knowing when to stop in the spinning out of implications of meaning” (1992, p. 59). i was finding it difficult to wrap up the understandings. how do i conclude in a way that does not have a strong whiff of literary interpretation? i could go on and on, or i could just stop here and acknowledge the ongoing nature of hermeneutic work. however, i could not leave the understandings lying around like puppies abandoned at a dog pound. moules et al. advised that they should not be “left there to dangle in an exotic display but must be brought back into the world where the topic is located” because deconstruction moves toward reconstruction (2015, p. 132). beyond the circle i cannot look at the concept of secrecy the same way ever again. considering the instances in the film, those i addressed here and those i briefly mentioned, i have come to several understandings of the topic. normally when one declares that one has a secret in possession the ins tinctive response is to persuade the secret-holder to reveal it. we usually want to know something once it has been imbued with the veneer of secrecy. secrecy has the quality of something which ought to be revealed eventually, whether that is done willfully or by happenstance. the unknown tends to be considered as mystery when the revelation has not happened. i was indecisive about whether to declare this understanding about secrecy and the reveal as a “finding” for this inquiry. i considered the researc h described in moules et al. (2015, p. 127) that grief is usually accompanied by the appearance of guilt, and tentatively latched on to this as support for my process. other inquiries will indicate other dimensions to secrecy that i have not considered here, but that is a recurring caveat when conducting hermeneutic research, that when we see one side, there is yet an unconcealed side. blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 8 now, when i hear the word secret used in common parlance, i will wonder about the understanding attached by the user. is it a genuine secret, or is the word used for effect? what would make it genuine? is there something perverse in wanting to know a secret? or is there something anti-social when people are unmoved by the idea of the thrill of secrecy? this film led me to consider that the concept of secrecy when attached to childhood, carries connotations of protection from harsh realities, or the pleasures of having a world without the intrusion of meddling others (adults or other children). indeed, these understandings are also applicable to secrecy and adulthood but secrets take on darker tones in the adult world. this inquiry made me reflect on the concept of gossip and how it hinges on the concept of secrecy. as i found myself going out of the parameters of the film, i came to see why the hermeneutic inquiry is an immersion into the flux of being. understanding is not bound. there is still more to uncover. i thought about secrets in a way i have never had to do before. through the experience of interpreting the film, i am ineluctably altered in my relationship with the concept. in trying to cultivate the hermeneutic sensibility this section of the paper is a bit like a post-script. what has this exercise revealed to me? how is this kind of inquiry different from literar y analysis? these were some of the questions which accompanied me throughout my exercise as i tried to be true to hermeneutic praxis. i have been acutely attentive to the similarities between hermeneutic approaches and literary analysis but i wanted to guard against naiveté and the assumption that my eventual research with people, reading the texts of interviews, can be done like analysis of fictional text. initially i wondered, how i would divorce my literary inclinations from the hermeneutic circle. i found as i read more about the principles of hermeneutic practice that there were pointed differences. this film is not about secrets. secrets inhabit a small part of the narrative arc. they are not an overriding theme or motif. literary analysis would involve coming to a conclusion about the use of secrets as a motif, a statement about what secrets add to the narrative as a whole, and proceed to look at how the major elements of the film use the concept of secrets to strengthen the narrative. i cannot simply convert an expert discussion about dramatic irony into a hermeneutic exemplar. the hermeneutic sensibility requires something different of me. grondin described hermeneutic practice as “a matter of knowing limitations and humility” (2003, p. 25). the practice demands that i ask different kinds of questions. it expects me to attend to the meanings attached to the phenomenon of secrets. indeed, the hermeneutic sensibility requires humility. i had not thought much about the concept of secrets, in this way, until now, even though i have some understanding of the topic. i was reading several texts about hermeneutics as i sought to develop the hermeneutic sensibility for this paper. i wanted to get it “right” immediately. i was irritated with the similarities a nd differences to what i was used to in literary analysis. i was impatient to get past the plurality and write a coherent paper on secrets. i suspended my concern about the paper and turned to the topic. i had to relinquish some control. understandings could not be conjured and concluded neatly in the same way that i would write a film review. understanding is partial, incomplete, still evolving. i ought not to forget that this is a principle of analysis – every time you look at a text, further understandings will emerge. the hermeneutic sensibility requires patience. grondin’s blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 9 almost confessionary tone that he was taken aback by gadamer’s declaration that the universal claim of hermeneutics was to be found in the “inner word” (1994, p. xiv), is a reminder t hat there is much to be discovered for practice and there will always still be more. i am a few months into reading the works of the prominent scholars of hermeneutics. i have been listening to youtube lectures, reading original works, reading critiques of these works, reading simple introductions to the major concepts, all in a view to saying, i know how to defend my choices. it has not felt sufficient yet. nevertheless, i do feel that it is not enough to read condensed versions of the main scholars or reinterpretations of their work. gadamer pointed out that “the claim of hermeneutics seems capable of being met only in the infinity of knowledge, in the thoughtful fusion of the whole of tradition with the present” (1960/2004, p. 337). in light of that i see the importance of attending to tradition and the need for more familiarity with the key thinkers. i cannot justifiably develop the hermeneutic practice without the hermeneutic sensibility which requires a historical consciousness of the scholarship. i know that there are other elements of the hermeneutic sensibility that need some tending but for now i am trusting the learning process, accompanied by caputo’s observation in moules et al. (p. xiii) that “hermeneutics does not shy away from the difficulty of life but summons the courage to deal with life in all its ambiguity” and jardine’s counsel that “we don’t fully know what it is because we don’t yet know what will become of it. and we don’t know this because it is still coming” (1992, p. 57). references bellman, b. (1981). the paradox of secrecy. human studies, 4(1), 1-24. doi:10.1007/bf0212 7445 caputo, j.d. (2000). more radical hermeneutics: on not knowing who we are. bloomington, in: indiana university press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/2004). truth and method (2nd ed.; j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (1976). philosophical hermeneutics. berkeley, ca: university of california press. grondin, j. (1994). introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. new haven, ny: yale university press. grondin, j., & plant, k. (2003). the philosophy of gadamer. montreal, qc, canada: mcgill queen's university press. hallström, l., jönsson, r., brännström, b., berglund, p., isfält, b., glanzelius, a., brömssen, t. v., & lidén, a. (1985/2003). my life as a dog. irvington, ny. blackman journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 11 10 jardine, d.w. (1992). the fecundity of the individual case: considerations of the pedagogic heart of interpretive work. journal of philosophy of education, 26, 1, 51-61.doi: 10.1111/j.14679752.1992.tb00264.x moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., & field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. palmer, r.e. (ed. & trans.) (2007). the gadamer reader: a bouquet of later writings. evanston, il: northwestern university press. microsoft word moulesetal2013.docx 1 university of calgary corresponding author: dr. n.j. moules email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics march 21, 2013 the author(s) 2013 “isn’t all of oncology hermeneutic?” nancy j. moules1, david w. jardine1, graham p. mccaffrey1, & christopher brown1 abstract in this paper, we describe an event during a pediatric oncology research meeting that prompted the discussion of the ways in which hermeneutics brings a different kind of understanding to both research and practice. we claim that oncology is the practical science of handling natural science research and as such practice in oncology is deeply hermeneutic in character in its recognition of the importance, vitality, and generativity of the “individual case” even in the face of amassed, verified, and aggregate knowledge that is given from the natural science research. oncology is always contingent, next case handling, and is not identifiable simply as something determined and guided by natural sciences alone. in the face of this, we propose that there is an obvious, profound, and natural fit of hermeneutic research in understanding the lives, relationships, suffering, and experiences that are affected by cancer. keywords childhood cancer, gadamer, hermeneutics, pediatric oncology, robert buckman the impetus for this paper arose during an alberta children’s hospital pediatric oncology research day in november 2012 in calgary, alberta where dedicated researchers presented the work they were currently conducting in efforts to cure, treat, and make sense of childhood cancer. most of the research presented was that of bench and natural science, understanding the progression of tumours, the impact of radiation on mice, randomized control trials, or evidence of the potential of a new chemotherapeutic agent. dr. nancy moules, alberta children’s hospital foundation and research institute nursing professorship in child and family centred cancer care, presented her research on understanding the impact of childhood cancer on lives and relationships, and her research approach of hermeneutics. in this context with this audience, it is a shared understanding that there is a very human experience of cancer and an appreciation that bench science offers one way of moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 2 knowing that must be translated in another kind of knowing that is handled in the day-today practical decisions, judgments about, and interactions with those undergoing such experiences. cancer is readily understood as an affliction that can affect all aspects of a person’s life, a phenomenon replete with complex and often contradictory cultural, historical, and personal/familial understandings, assumptions, hopes, fears, and expectations. there exists a whole world of lived experience that precedes bench science and provides it with the contexts of its application and the conditions of its value. moules, in her description of hermeneutics as a legitimate research method in understanding cancer, moved past the very public cry for finding “cures” for cancer and into the lives of people who have cancer, who may or may not be treated successfully, who may die, who may suffer losses to their sense of self, their body image, or their peace of mind. there is something inherently difficult when we add this mention of suffering. over and above the sought-for clarities of bench science, doctors, nurses, and other health professionals must learn to live with what they know and to handle this knowledge well, with a sense of dignity and proportion that is acutely aware that this knowledge inevitably invokes a whole life-world of experience and faces medical practitioners and patients and families alike with the experience of suffering. in the valuation of research that seeks for cure, there is hope and fear, and an awed waiting upon the presumed inevitable triumph of science. hermeneutics is a form of research into the effects of cancer on individuals and families, as well as the effects of cancer on those treating such individuals and families, a method that opens a way to inquiry into all of these considerations, in all their awkwardness and difficulty. yet, in this context, as in many others, hermeneutics is again and again required to account for itself, while all along addressing the suffering that is attendant upon childhood cancer. hermeneutics is frequently asked to live up to the ways, means, and methods of the natural sciences. in addressing the issue of numbers and power in this kind of research, moules briefly outlined some of the ideas in dr. david jardine's (1992) “the fecundity of the individual case” which demonstrated the strengths that surround hermeneutic work and the vital importance of hermeneutics as a way to understand the living character of our living professions. it is in the power of the particular in the recognition of one voice, one experience, one diminishment of suffering, one experience of healing that our professions have always found their real power and their real, living knowledge. it is in the moment of being present at the death of one child; or watching one patient walk for the first time on artificial limbs; or the privilege of being present while this family hears bad news or good news. it is in the richness of the power of these individual, particular moments of grace, kinship, and human relationship where the professions have always found their own graceful and powerful place in the context of one human life, here and now, in this, and this, and this (wallace, 1987). in this forum and in reaction to this sketching out of the nature of hermeneutic knowledge and its place in our profession, dr. peter craighead, professor and head of the department of oncology at tom baker cancer centre, rose and said, in response. “yes, this makes sense to me. isn’t all of oncology hermeneutic?” a part of this response was rooted in dr. craighead's respect for a recently deceased colleague. dr. robert buckman died at 63 years of age on october 9, 2011. a renowned medical oncologist, author, and comedian, dr. buckman was known for his unorthodox apmoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 3 proach to illness and death. he was reported to have once commented that it was the individual person who changed his practice every time. in this regard, dr. buckman was arguing for something subtly hermeneutic about his practice and about the knowledge that arises only in practice. it was not simply that the individual patient was more important than his aggregate knowledge of oncology, but that the confrontation with the individual, the particular, always enlivened, challenged, and informed that very knowledge, keeping it awake, alert, and in proper perspective. he held his amassed professional knowledge with a certain readiness and “lightness,” as could always be seen from the often sheer delight with which he greeted “the next case.” the next case always seemed to arrive as an opportunity to open up his vast knowledge and to let it be susceptible to what enlivening difference this new arrival might make. he embodied this openness with his patients, with the general public, and in relation to his own suffering. dr. buckman provided us with a strong confirmation of the vitality and importance of hermeneutics to professional life and practice, as demonstrated in the title of one of his books, cancer is a word, not a sentence (2006). for the experienced practitioner, the arrival of “the next case” involves its arrival into a territory of knowledge and experience for which that case provides a live and rich occasioning of our attention. the experienced practitioner is one who must remain open to such arrivals and the differences that can be made to them, to us and to the life and wellbeing of the living discipline(s) we are inhabiting with our patients and their families. the word “case,” long since incorporated into medical, legal, and other professional speech, has this sense of arrival in its origin. case derives from the latin casus, meaning a chance, occasion, opportunity; accident, mishap. literally, it means “a falling.” in the 13th century, it had the meaning of “what befalls one” and in the 18th century began to be adopted by medicine (online etymology dictionary, 2012). a case is something that has befallen one. despite the professional control implied in the “case history” or the “case study,” when a doctor or nurse meets a person with cancer, something “befalls” the professional too. the next case of a patient is not simply an “existential” matter of it being this person and no one else, and therefore a matter of the irreplaceable life of this individual who is not replaceable in their suffering with anyone else. all this is certainly true. the issue is what difference it makes to those of us who already know much about such suffering, who have already witnessed a long line of symptoms and presentations and varieties of heartache or fear or bold readiness to do “battle” with the invader. the issue is how our knowledge is not simply “amassed verified knowledge” (gadamer, 1989, p. xxi) anonymously held in some figurative storehouse, so that this new arrival simply gets slotted into the right locale of that store. our knowledge is also a form of readiness for new experience it opens towards this new arrival in anticipation of being called to account, of being summoned and needing to respond professionally, “properly,” in ways that gadamer (1989) described as “relations of responding and summoning” (p. 458). this describes the profound vulnerability of our professional bearing that we deliberately make ourselves and what we know susceptible to the subtleties of what is arriving. more than this, it is because we are experienced that we are able to find this carrying of ourselves practicable, day-to-day. this susceptibility is a matter of how we experience our experience; whether we can see ourselves not only out of the authority of our expertise, but also as being experienced by the other. experience in this sense includes humility; it is permeable and reciprocal, and inevitably atmoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 4 tendant upon that which it does not produce from itself and its own storehouse of knowledge. as gadamer (1996) noted in his essay hermeneutics and psychiatry, “…the doctor needs more than just scientific and technical knowledge and professional experience” (p. 172). the doctor or the nurse also needs a well-honed sense of practical knowledge and practical judgment, wherein individual cases are treated with a sense of proper proportion borne of practice itself (what aristotle called phronesis rather than techne). these two forms of knowledge are not in a battle with one another for the same territory or voice, but neither is one simply replaceable for the other or able to do the work of the other. “although the expertise of a technical knowledge...has a proximity to phronesis, technical knowledge does not ask the question of the good or the just comprehensively, or it does not allow us to act comprehensively in each situation” (gadamer, 2007b, p. 232). an experienced hematologist/oncologist colleague offered this view: i deal with very nasty malignant diseases. fatal if our therapies don’t work. each of these diseases can be categorized under broad headings and, as our knowledge advances, increasingly narrow subheadings. such a degree of organization implies that a process of inquiry about this disease has revealed enough to form the basis of a broadly accepted approach to the disease, a therapeutic plan, a management strategy. for many disease entities we have such an approach. “you have disease x and the book says do this.” it doesn’t always work as well as is hoped but at least we have a plan. this makes medicine sound quite formulaic and from a biomedical perspective this is what we strive for the magic formula. a moment of reflection will reveal that these formulae provide strategies for managing diseases. but diseases exist in people and our magic formulae rarely take that into account. hermeneutics provides a form of research geared to precisely such difficult accounting. it does so by reformulating what it means to “apply” what one knows in a specific case. it is not that those who practice within the natural sciences and help to develop such knowledge that provide formulae do not care about individual cases; they do this work because they care deeply. hermeneutics, however, maintains that the difficulty of these cases and the complexity of the human experience of them can be understood and known. science might question the study of such things as perhaps only subjective, private, and even indemonstrable, or that if they are to be studied, they must be subjected to the particular rigour of the scientific method. hermeneutics provides a way to study human experience that does not subject it to the demands of the natural sciences, but still provides dynamic, rich, compelling, and detailed understanding and description that leaves all of their difficulty and ambiguity in place and makes it available to thinking, communication, sharing, and a deeper understanding of, and sensitivity to, the subtleties of lived experience. hermeneutics also provides ways to improve practice through studies of lived experience by pointing to the layers of ambiguous entailment in which live with our patients – the coming of the death of a child is troublesome, terrible, surrounded by myriad tales, images, and fears. understanding this in detail improves the practice of oncology, not by “nailing down” something more securely but by honing and shaping our ability to be aware of and articulate our lived surroundings. in truth and method, gadamer (1989) demonstrated how understanding, in this hermoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 5 meneutic sense, is “more a passion than an action” (p. 366). it is not the application of a rule to a case but more like the application of a case to a rule. our already established “magic formulae” must befall and respond to the demands that the new case brings and expects of such knowledge. this knowledge is something we must therefore “undergo,” something we must “suffer.” in choosing to work in an area such as oncology, one agrees to this hermeneutic wager, to a willingness to not only suffer but to “suffer together” in the way that moules (1999) wrote of compassion as a hermeneutic endeavor that is willful and deliberate. this is why gadamer suggested that at the heart of this living knowledge is an old greek adage: pathei mathos: “learning through suffering” (gadamer, 1989, p. 356), an idea itself inherited from the greek tragedies of aeschylus (c. 525 bce). the hermeneutic tradition recognizes that there is something inherently difficult and transformative in the act of becoming experienced in the ways of the world, and from such a process “no one can be exempt” (gadamer, 1989, p. 355). this claim about experience extends across the whole gamut of human life, from small, exhilarating interruptions of one’s expectations (moments of inquiry, learning, engagement, investigation, questioning) to traumatic experiences of mortality, impermanence, and illness (moments considered “life changing”). in all these cases, the learning and teaching that ensues is understood as “an adventure and, like any adventure, it always involves some risk” (gadamer, 1983, p. 141), including, of necessity, “moments of loss of self” (gadamer, 1977, p. 51) wherein who i understand myself to be and what i understand of the world might have to endure suffering change. this is why, as professionals, we are drawn towards the suffering of others because it is there that we experience a deep insight into our shared human lot. this, again, recalls the example of dr. buckman and his willingness to step into the suffering of others and to use his own suffering as way to help others. application is neither a subsequent nor merely an occasional part of the phenomenon of [hermeneutic] understanding, but codetermines it as a whole form the beginning. this does not mean that…he first understands [some pregiven universal] per se, and then afterward uses it for particular applications. rather, the interpreter seeks no more than to understand this universal -i.e., to understand what it says, what constitutes [its] meaning and significance. in order to understand that, he must not try to disregard himself and his particular hermeneutical situation. he must relate [it] to this situation if he wants to understand at all. (gadamer, 1989, p. 324) this next patient, this next presentation of symptoms, these next uttered words of concern, do not simply “fall under” general principles or established knowledge, but ask something of this knowledge. they ask of the general principle that it proves itself “in this case” to be adequate to such a case. this ability to deftly judge the relationship between established knowledge and the arrival of a new case is itself a type of practical knowledge that does not operate in the same way as the establishment of that natural scientific knowledge itself. it is, rather, a cluster of contingent practical judgments. one can become practiced in such judgments, but one cannot give a set of rules for how to make such judgments because those rules, in turn, would require cultivating, in practice, an understanding of their application. each patient is embarking on a difficult journey on a road that is unknown to them. a part of our responsibility as physicians is to prepare our patients for the journey and then walk with them. that moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 6 comes partly by providing them with insight about what may lie ahead and the likelihood of having to change plans according to what happens on the journey. the conversation needs to be ongoing and open-ended. things change. i start such a conversation by asking the patient and family to explain to me what they know about their disease and what is being offered. for me, it defines the starting point and strategy of our ongoing conversation and it is often a unique starting point and always a unique strategy. the hermeneutic object of interest is the ability, in practice, to recognize a case as a case of some general principle, as a case that exemplifies it, modifies it, defies it, or “nearly fits” or demands that our established knowledge gain more subtlety, differentiation, and acuity. this judgment is not a matter of simply applying the general principle to the case, but allowing the case to “speak back” to that already-established knowledge in such a way that the case puts the principle into question and demands that the knowledge already established gives an account of its applicability in the face of the demands made by the case: the ordering of life by rules of law…is incomplete and needs productive supplementation. at issue is always something more than the correct application of general principles. our knowledge…is always supplemented by the individual case, even productively determined by it. the judge not only applies the law in concreto, but contributes through his very judgment to developing the law. [our knowledge] is constantly developed through the fecundity of the individual case. (gadamer, 1989, p. 38) the individual case on which judgment works is never simply a case; it is not exhausted by being a particular example of a universal law or concept. rather, it is always an “individual case,” and it is significant that we call it a special case, because the rule does not [and cannot] comprehend [this individuality]. every judgment about something intended in its concrete individuality (e.g., the judgment required in a situation that calls for action) is - strictly speaking -a judgment about a special case. that means nothing less than that judging the case involves not merely applying the universal principle according to which it is judged, by co-determining, supplement, and correcting that principle. (gadamer, 1989, p. 39) negotiating this susceptibility of established knowledge to the arrival of the next case is the work of hermeneutics and it is the work of oncology. “the true locus of hermeneutics is this in-between” (gadamer, 1989, p. 295). this is how professions, of necessity, are not simply the impervious and imperial wielding of “amassed verified knowledge.” professionals seek out instances of suffering or undergoing, instances of susceptibility where the locale of meeting a challenge to our knowledge is at once a locale of meeting our patient “in” this suffering, “in” the locale of taking seriously their arrival as requiring us, with all our aggregate knowledge of, and familiarity with, such matters, to engage this arrival. we, like them, must allow what we know to come into play with the person that has arrived with questions, knowledge, fears, concerns, evidence, foibles, resolve, and all the particularities of presentation. this is the negotiation that is at the heart of diagnosis, that our aggregate knowledge is not simply a slot into which the new patient fits, but is, rather, something that must, with great subtlety, respond well to that arrival and let that arrival do the work proper to its particularity. we know, as professionals, that we can, with those new to our profession, lay out the critemoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 7 ria of a particular pathology, but we cannot outrun the difficulty of recognizing this case as an example of that pathology. i met with the patient and family to discuss what we had to offer to treat the leukemia and our chances of success. they asked insightful questions. i was told, “if my number is up there is nothing i can do about it but let’s try our best.” there was a peace in the room. the treatment went well at the beginning but then went off the rails. each challenge was faced with determination and a calmness as “the number” came up. our conversations had remained easy despite the increasing gravity of what we were discussing and often we had shared a laugh. after many weeks of struggle, the patient passed away with the family at their side. this is a practical form of knowledge that cannot be amassed theoretically, nor can it be simply handed over to another professional without that person having to now cultivate this knowledge for him or herself. a common adage in the work of oncology is the “experienced” practitioner. hermeneutics identifies how “becoming experienced” is not a matter of simply an increased expertise in “amassed verified [bench science] knowledge” (gadamer 1989, p. xxi) but an increased deftness in how one “handles” such knowledge in practice. being experienced does not culminate in knowing more and better than anyone else (the sort of required expertise in the “amassed verified knowledge” of one’s field requisite of being “knowledgeable in the field”). hermeneutics points to another vital and essential form of knowledge and experience that are not of the same kind of knowledge as this expertise. “experience has its proper fulfillment not in definitive [amassed] knowledge but in the openness to [new] experience[s] that is made possible by experience itself” (gadamer 1989, p. 355). an experienced doctor or nurse, therefore, is not simply someone who as been in such a profession for many years. being experienced, in hermeneutics, is connected with an old concept from the humanist tradition: bildung (bruford, 2010; gadamer, 1989; pinar, 2011; von humbolt 2000), a german term meaning self-formation, that is, the endured process of becoming someone in the act of coming to know about oneself and the world. this site of becoming someone is the site of pathei mathos because it requires a type of “undergoing” or “suffering” in which one risks becoming changed and having to live with the consequences. i met with the patient and family to discuss what we had to offer to treat the leukemia and our chances of success. they asked insightful questions. i was told, “if my number is up there is nothing i can do about it but let’s try our best.” there was palpable fear in the room and the patient looked truly terrified. the next questions were, “what will happen to me?” and “what are my chances?” i started over again and tried a different approach. the treatment went badly from an early stage. each challenge was faced with determination but the terror never left the patient’s eyes. i was never sure if my conversations were answering their questions or addressing their needs. after many weeks of struggle, the patient passed away with the family at their side. this situation started and ended the same as the one described before it, but in the middle of it something changed, something that called the oncologist to realize that no amount of amassed and aggregate knowledge or mastery of such knowledge, no “magic formulae,” could save the oncologist from the “deliberation and decision” to move and act differently in this case (gadamer, 1983, p. 113). gadamoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 8 mer advanced the idea of hermeneutics as a condition of being human, an inescapable immersion in making sense of the world, but always finitely, always open to reinterpretation. this does not mean, however, that hermeneutic reflection is automatic. bildung demands effort and practice; hermeneutic experience has an ethical dimension of choosing to make oneself available to the difficulty of life, the pathei mathos. in this encounter, the oncologist persevered in the face of the disease, in facing the terror in the patient’s eyes, and in facing the fact that he could never be sure. concluding reflections when a diagnosis is confirmed for a patient, or particular symptoms are described as such, the oncologist is able to “hear” a wide range of possibilities and probabilities. there is an ability to know, from long experience, something of a patient's possible future(s) and possible future suffering in ways that someone without this expertise simply could not. this is not exactly the same as simply “having the facts” but rather knowing that the facts alone will not save you or address the situation. there is that wonderful/terrible weight of then having to decide what might be best to say or not say, to indicate, or clothe, or to be straightforward about. this sort of judgment and its soundness and trustworthiness is an amazing thing. as professionals knowledgeable in our fields, we sometimes hold back in having a patients bear all the weight of what could be said, not to be dishonest, but to be measured and to try to act properly, in proper proportion to the best reading that can given of the full breadth of the circumstances. this is something of why and how we are professionals and not only technicians in possession of amassed scientific knowledge: the way of life of human beings is not fixed by nature like other living beings. knowingly preferring one thing to another and consciously choosing among possible alternatives is the unique and specific characteristic of human being. the knowledge that gives direction to action is essentially called for by concrete situations in which we are required to choose the thing to be done and no learned and mastered technique can spare us the task of deliberation and decision. (gadamer, 2007b, pp. 230-231) even though we slowly, through practice and experience, become more receptive to the arrival of the next case and the difference it will bring, it always also feels like the first time as well; it feels brand new this family, that child, those odd descriptions of symptoms, real, imagined, dreamt, feared, or seen with terrible clarity. as buckman reminded us, walking into the room of the next patient will forever change our practices, but this requires an awareness that something has changed as well as an opening not to just find what fits with what we already know but what informs us anew. gadamer (2007a) suggested that “[the world] compels over and over, and the better one knows it, the more compelling it is. this is not a matter of mastering an area of study” (p. 115). this is the practical knowledge or “being experienced” that is the object of research in hermeneutic work and it: does have a certain proximity to the expert knowledge that is proper to technique, but what separates it fundamentally from technical expertise is that it expressly asks the question of the good--for example, about the best way of life [or about what course of action would be better than others]. it does not merely master an ability, like technical expertise, whose task is set by an outside authority [e.g., the methods of natural science in producing experimoules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 9 mental results, or the simple rote following of procedures in a hospital unit] or by the purpose to be served by what is being produced [e.g., given we have to reduce wait times, do this instead of that]. (gadamer, 2007b, p. 232) robert buckman knew something of suffering, but perhaps his greatest wisdom was that he did not claim to know it with certainty and finality, because he understood that that is not our lot, as humans, to know once and for all. even knowledge that has been pinned down with great precision by natural scientific methodology does not help us avoid having to decide, contingently and carefully, as to whether this is a case of that, and if it is, what we might now best do with those whose suffering is in our hands. buckman saw suffering as the thing that could only be approached through a hermeneutic wager that the next “case” would indeed change the face of understanding the minute the door was opened. oncology is world of discovery, of devout care and intense search for cure. the natural and biological sciences are responsible for significant decreases in cancer morbidity, long-term cure, and longevity of life. this world of science and discovery is vital but there is another world inherent in oncology a world of the individual case, the n=1. this is a particular world of suffering that is not disembodied or detached from the rest of the world of scientific discovery, for it is fecund with its own kind of discovery, where fear shows or it does not, and even if the outcomes are the same, the process of getting there never is. it is the argument for the innate fit of hermeneutic inquiry and research into the worlds of particulars, worlds that do not stand alone but have always something to say to the next door. authors nancy j. moules, rn, phd is a professor in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary. she also holds an alberta children’s hospital foundation/alberta children’s hospital research institute nursing professorship in child and family centred cancer care. david w. jardine, phd is a professor in the faculty of education at the university of calgary. graham p. mccaffrey, rn, phd is an assistant professor in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary. christopher b. brown, md, frcp is a professor in the departments of medicine, oncology, and biochemistry & molecular biology. he is affiliated with the southern alberta cancer institute. references arendt, h. (1969). between past and future: eight exercises in political thought. new york, ny: penguin books. buckman, r. (2005). cancer is a word, not a sentence: a practical guide to help you through the first few weeks. toronto, on, canada: key porter books. bruford, w. h. (2010). the german tradition of self-cultivation: 'bildung' from humboldt to thomas mann. cambridge, ma: cambridge university press. case. (n.d.). in in online etymology dictionary. retrieved from http;//www .etymonline.com gadamer, h.g. (1996). hermeneutics and psychiatry. in h.g. gadamer, the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age moules et al. journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 3 10 (pp. 163-174). stanford, ca: stanford university press. gadamer, h.g. (1983). reason in the age of science (f.g. lawrence, trans.). boston, ma: mit press. gadamer, h. g. (1977). philosophical hermeneutics. berkeley, ca: university of california press. gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (j. weinsheimer, trans.). new york, ny: continuum books. gadamer, h.g. (2007a). from word to concept: the task of hermeneutics as philosophy. in r.e. palmer (ed. & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 108-122). evanston, il: northwestern university press. gadamer, h.g. (2007b). hermeneutics as practical philosophy. in r.e. palmer (ed. & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 227-245). evanston il: northwestern university press. jardine, d. (1992). “the fecundity of the individual case”: considerations of the pedagogic heart of interpretive work. british journal of philosophy of education, 26(1), 51-61. moules, n.j. (1999). guest editorial. suffering together: whose words were they? journal of family nursing, 5(3), 251-258. pinar, w. (2011). the character of curriculum studies: bildung, currere, and the recurring question of the subject. new york, ny: palgrave macmillan. von humbolt, w. (2000 [1793-1794]). theory of bildung. in i. westbury, s. hopmann, and k. riquarts (eds.), teaching as a reflective practice: the german didaktik tradition (pp. 57-61). (trans. by g. horton-krüger.). mahwah, nj: lawrence erlbaum. wallace, b. (1987). the stubborn particulars of grace. toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. corresponding author: nathaniel g. samuel st. thomas university email: nsamuel@stu.edu journal of applied hermeneutics online date the author(s) 2015 re-storied by beauty: on self-understanding in the ricoeur-carr discussions on narrative nathaniel g. samuel abstract this essay examines the issue of self-understanding, following paul ricoeur who characterizes it as one of the three dimensions of a literary work. the essay places the issue in the context of ricoeur’s discussions with david carr on self-understanding or selfhood identity, demonstrating where the two theorists differ, but ultimately proposing how they complement each other to enrich the issue. i argue that the two converge at a significant point that selfhood-identity is mediated by a host of cultural artifacts, all experienced as narrative. i support this thesis by exploring the way in which the transcultural symbol of sharing a meal can mediate selfunderstanding, and occasion the narrative re-storying of a life. attending to the character of general loewenhielm in isak dinesen’s (1993) babette’s feast, i describe the feast as an event of beauty, arguing how this worked to restore a sense of unity to the general’s life. keywords self-understanding, identity, narrative, paul ricoeur, david carr, beauty, babette’s feast i wish to examine the issue of self-understanding in this essay, following paul ricoeur who characterizes it as one of the three dimensions of a literary work, besides referentiality and communicability (ricoeur, 1991a, p. 27). in particular, i place this issue in the context of discussamuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 2 sions between ricoeur and david carr. 1 admittedly, these discussions have previously (and accurately) been framed in terms of the question of referentiality (kearney, 2006). my aim here is to take up what i perceive to be another dimension of the exchange that of self-understanding or selfhood-identity – demonstrating where the two theorists differ, but ultimately proposing how they complement each other to enrich the issue. my point of departure will be ricoeur’s work on selfhood-identity, particularly his proposed role for literary fiction as mediating between “man [sic] and himself” (ricoeur, 1991a, p. 27). next, i bring david carr’s work particularly carr (1986) into conversation with ricoeur on the aforementioned themes. i argue that carr’s thesis on the self and narrative is not as far from ricoeur’s position as may be imagined. both theorists appear to subscribe to the narrative quality of human life as a first order, even before that life is represented in literary or historical fiction. this will serve as my first thesis in the essay. the second, and more significant, thesis concerns the way in which carr’s ideas can supplement ricoeur’s triple-mimetic model. i contend that the two authors converge at a significant point: selfhood-identity may be mediated by a host of cultural artifacts, themselves experienced as narrative. ricoeur invites this conclusion while maintaining the primacy of literary fiction by stating that fiction is the privileged mediation of self-understanding “among other [cultural] signs and symbols” that can also function in this role. by arguing that narrative is constitutive of all experiencing, carr’s work warrants the conclusion that these cultural symbols are efficacious in the formation of selfhood and society because they are narratively engaged. to elucidate this thesis, i turn – in the third section of the essay – to the description of the fabled banquet in isak dinesen’s (1993) babette’s feast, which i interpret as offering an example of a cultural artifact that mediates the coming to self-knowledge of the character general loewenhielm. my analysis will not be at the level of the text itself (textual criticism). rather, i examine the imaginary world unfolded by the text, focusing on the dialectic between general loewenhielm’s life and the events surrounding the feast. in the process, i describe babette’s lavish feast as an event of beauty, arguing how this worked to restore (refigure) a sense of unity to the general’s life, accompanied by an unexpected recognition of the permeability of daily life to a prodigal and transcendent grace. as such, babette’s sumptuous feast exemplifies how cultural artifact may serve a transformative and mediatory role in the process of selfunderstanding. ricoeur on self-understanding the problem of self-understanding, as conceptualized by paul ricoeur, stems from the difficulty (even impossibility) of answering the introspective who questions in life – notably: “who am i?” or “who is that person?” from experience, it may be apparent that answers to such questions are 1 the formal exchanges between paul ricouer and david carr have often been considered as a “debate” in the literature. for example, see (kearney, 2006, p. 477). i opt for the term “discussions” on the belief that, to characterize the discourse as a debate, places too much emphasis on the differences between the positions, rather than on the rich insights to be found in the convergences and divergences between ricouer and carr. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 3 not simply reducible to what one does (by way of an activity or profession), or even to a person’s character, idiosyncrasies, and dispositions. to be sure, declaring an occupation (“i am a teacher”) or confessing a certain affinity (“i love being a parent”) may indeed reveal something of a person’s identity, but these assertions do not exhaust the mystery or indeterminacy of the consciousness that poses the question “who am i?” in the first place. identity is aporetic precisely because of its immanence and transcendence to the realm of action, disposition, and character. the question, therefore, of ascription locating the particular entity behind an action, disposition or character – remains intractable. in addition, ricoeur believes that the same can be concluded for the question of imputation – the assigning of moral significance to an action – that entails “accusation, excuse or acquittal, blame or praise” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 191). imputation implies being responsible to the other who needs me, and who asks, “where are you?” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 165) the ethical response notwithstanding, there remains considerable mystery about this self who is called by the other. in light of this, the “who” question at the level of imputation becomes, “who am i … that … you should count on me?” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 168). the problem of identity is essentially a search for coherence or permanence-in-time. ricoeur’s conceptual framework casts the issue in terms of a dialectic of identity-as-selfhood (ipse) and identity-as-sameness (idem) (ricoeur, 1991b). selfhood-identity is what is at issue in human being, and ricoeur observes that it may be established anywhere along a proposed spectrum. at one end, selfhood coincides with sameness. the question of “who” is answered by an assertion of a “what” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 198). at this limit, identity is described as absolute and immutable to evolving, exemplified by popular fairy-tale characters like the “big, bad wolf” or the “evil stepsister” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 148). ricoeur argues that everyday selfhood-identity is inadequately conceived at this end of the spectrum. approaching the other end of the spectrum, characterized for ricoeur by such virtues as selfconstancy, selfhood is entirely distinct from sameness. the merit of conceiving selfhood in this way is that the self is not simply reduced to matters of character. in fact, instability in a person’s perceived character would in no way be seen as negating selfhood. as stated before, one is always more than what one is or does. at the limit of this end of the spectrum, an identity constituted by sheer character-effacing change is indeed imaginable, if only realizable in the world of fiction. given this spectrum of possibilities, the issue of identity for ricoeur becomes “what sort of permanence [in time] is appropriate to a self?” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 192). how is a sense of self retained in relation to these polar alternatives of “absolute identity” and “sheer change”? ricoeur’s answer: narrative configuration and refiguration. the narrative self exists between these poles, providing a sense of coherence and unity even through the volatility and discordances of life, without reducing personhood to fixity of character. hence, even in the midst of a crisis of self, one can still make the assertion “here i am!” and “here i stand!” before the “other” who calls me to account. ricoeur’s central thesis concerns the role that literary and historical fiction plays in mediating narrative identity. essentially, the existential aporia of selfhood-identity is “elevated to a new level of lucidity and also of perplexity” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 195) that ultimately serve to illumine the very real process of self-understanding. here, the selfhood-sameness dialectic is subjected to samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 4 a myriad of “imaginative variations” from the structured plot and sedimented characters of the classic fairy tale, to the pastiche and disjointed plot of the stream of consciousness novel. the limit case of contemporary literary fiction is particularly important to ricoeur, because such novels serve to bring selfhood-identity into focus by “taking away the support of sameness” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 149). in this narrative genre, the relation between character and plot is inverted – the plot serves the character, and introduces such volatility that “the character in the story ceases to have a definite character.” 2 there is a seeming loss of identity evinced by the admission “i am nothing.” yet, the very fact that there is still a “who” that can assert, “i am nothing,” preserves the validity of the question of ascription. “who am i, who am nothing?” if anything, the limit cases of fiction demonstrate the persistence of the “who” question in fiction and in life. these limit cases also highlight the durability of imputation. the moral obligation to the other does not dissolve with loss of character or identity. the character development of the contemporary novel may rest on multivocality, but the characters themselves are not beyond the ethical import of their actions and decisions. in this case, ricoeur rephrases the question of imputation as: “who am i, so inconstant, that notwithstanding you count on me.” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 168) the limit cases from fiction serve to illustrate that, in both cases ascription and imputation the question of selfhood-identity persists, even when unmoored from sameness identity. the reader may recognize ricoeur’s triple-mimetic structure unfolding here. mimesis i (prefiguration) refers to the existential condition of the subject in quest of an identity, buffeted by the myriad of signs, cultural symbols, and life stories that constitute a social milieu. it forms the matrix within which the self must be identified within the dialectic of sameness and selfhood. mimesis ii (configuration) refers to the mediation of literary narrative, with its profusion of imaginative variations that present a virtual “laboratory of selfhood” to the reader. at the stage of refiguration (mimesis iii), the dialectic of selfhood-identity played out in multiplicity by diverse literary plot is appropriated in real life through reading. 3 in this way, the self “turns out to be a figured self” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 199) transposed from the world of the text into reality, the question of selfhood becomes the horizon that keeps the hermeneutic engagement of text and the search for narrative coherence going. narrative thus plays a critical though not unique role in the discovery of the self. ricoeur (1991b, p. 198) reminds, “the self does not know itself immediately, but only indirectly by the detour of the cultural signs of all sorts which are articulated on the symbolic mediations which always already articulate action and, among them, the narratives of everyday life.” selfknowledge is in fact self-interpretation for ricoeur, and “self interpretation, in its turn, finds in narrative, among other signs and symbols, a privileged mediation” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 188, emphasis added) 2 ricoeur provides the example of robert musil in the man without qualities to this end. see (ricoeur, 1994, pp. 148-149). 3 ricoeur’s theory of reading is made plain in this respect; reading affords an “exegesis of ourselves” – we read ‘ourselves’ when we read a work of literary or historical fiction. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 5 of note in the last quote is ricoeur’s assertion that literary narratives constitute only one of the possible classes of cultural signs and symbols that mediate identity albeit a privileged one. ricoeur (1991b, p. 188) points to the “narratives of everyday life” as another mediating symbolic system. this includes, i suggest, the virtual stories that “play out in our head” and gives structure to daily action and human existence. it is precisely at this point that i find congruence with david carr’s thesis on the narrative quality of experience. the narratives of daily life, which give a sense of coherence and unity to life, are crucial in his discussion of referentiality, and his theory of self. carr on self-understanding carr’s work on narrative is a significant response to the assertion that “real events do not have the character of those we find in stories” (carr, taylor, & ricoeur, 1991, p. 160), a position he attributes to such theorists as frank kermode, seymour chatman, roland barthes, hayden white, and louis mink. accordingly, the narrative form of fiction, biography, and history is a feature of narrative composition and does not subsist in the reality that these discourses attempt to capture. in short, narrative form is imposed on reality. carr names this position the standard view. he counters, “narration, far from being a distortion of, denial of or escape from ‘reality’, is in fact an extension and enrichment, a confirmation, not a falsification, of its primary features” (carr, et al., 1991, p. 162). he draws on husserl’s theory of time consciousness to support his thesis, arguing that the criteria for having an experience at all is that the object of experience is foregrounded by what preceded it (retention), and by what is expected to follow (protention). this means that human reality can hardly be considered a sequence of discrete events. rather, we experience the events of life as “charged with the significance they derive from our protentions and retentions” (carr et al., 1991, p. 163). this protentional-retentional perception gives a unified, coherent and, hence, meaningful structure to individual experiences and events. on the more complex level of the experiencing of a whole life, the same kind of temporal reflective gaze operates, albeit on a far more comprehensive level. carr compares this temporal gaze to dilthey’s conception of besinnung, which entails a form of taking stock of what has gone before, anticipating what will come in the future, so as to shape present action. as such, the standard position of reality – as a discrete flow of events – misleads even at the level of a whole life. human reality is not simply meaningless temporal sequence. the one difference between literary narrative and life, carr points out, is that the former has a distinct author! life “fails to live up to the formal coherence and the clear-cut authorship of some stories” (carr et al., 1991, p. 166). he grants the standard theorists this point concerning the divergence of life and narrative. while there is continuity in the narrative form, the authorship of literary composition is far more refined, with the ability to choose which events are included in the plot so as to provide a logical and satisfactory progression to the story’s denouement. in life, however, the same level of choice is not there, “everything is left in…because there is no narrasamuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 6 tor in command, no narrative voice which does the selecting” (carr et al., 1991, p. 165). 4 he agrees with ricoeur on this point: we are not the authors of our life story. 5 we can narrate, but ultimately we do not choose the material or events that compose our life. neither can we see the conclusion. yet, this is not to say that no selection takes place in life. “our very capacity for attention, and for following through more or less long-term and complex endeavours [sic], is our capacity for selection. extraneous details are not left out, but they are pushed into the background, saved for later, ranked in importance” (carr, et al., 1991, p. 165). however, we make these selections from the perspective of a narrator, rather than that of an author. carr writes: unlike the author of fiction we do not create the materials we are to form; we are stuck with what we have in the way of characters, capacities and circumstances…. we are constantly having to revise the plot, scrambling to intercept the slings and arrows of fortune and the stupidity or stubbornness of our uncooperative fellows, who will insist on coming up with their own stories instead of docilely accommodating themselves to ours. and the fact that we are ourselves sometimes among that recalcitrant audience, that each of us has his own self to convince and cajole into line, puts paid to any pretensions we might have to anything like being author of our own lives: not only do we not control the circumstances, so that they conform to our plans; we do not control our plans, or even the self who plans, whose identity is threatened in the internal dialogue whereby we become our worst enemies. (carr et al., 1991, p. 166) life is an ongoing narrative and we are its narrators, sifting through its vicissitudes in search of a coherent and progressive story of our existence. therefore, the question of identity (or self-understanding) comes down to that of the coherence of one’s life story (carr, 1986, p. 74). from the perspective of an ever-changing now, we as narrators take stock of the experiences, events, actions, roles, practices, relationships that make up our lives (planned or contingent, short and long-term), through a temporal reflective gaze (besinnung) that seeks coherence and a sense of wholeness and meaning. carr describes this process of cultivating, maintaining, and restoring narrative coherence over a life as a struggle. as indicated before, personal stories frequently intersect, plans go askew, and daily life is subject to contingency, not the least of which is the ever-present threat of death. life is messy! as such narrative identity, understood in terms of the unity of the self, is something to be achieved (carr, 1986, p. 97). human beings do so to varying degrees of success, but the challenge endures literally until our dying day. with this thesis, carr departs from kant’s and hume’s idea that the self is ultimately “pre-given” – that it is the very condition for the possibility of experience (kant), or that it is not to be found in experience (hume). rather he insists that unity of self makes no sense unless it implicates the way in which that self is experienced. our experience of selfhood is ultimately tied to our experience of narrative coherence. 4 carr treats author and narrator as equivalent here. 5 ricoeur describes life in terms of co-authorship: “by narrating a life of which i am not the author as to existence, i make myself its coauthor as to its meaning” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 162). samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 7 comparing ricoeur and carr on identity and selfhood at this point, some interesting convergences emerge with ricoeur’s thesis on narrative identity and selfhood. first, carr’s observation of the messiness of life and the consequent challenge to narrative coherence and identity parallels ricoeur’s thesis on the interplay of concord and discord in life (ricoeur, 1991a, p. 31). for the latter, it is particularly the discordant in life – the contingent – that spurs us to restore a sense of coherence. the type of existential emplotment by which one’s identity is constituted, seeks to achieve a synthesis of very heterogeneous events and experiences that constitute daily life. second, ricoeur describes narrative identity as something discovered through a process of interpretation (ricoeur, 1991a, p. 32). the subtle difference with carr’s idea that narrative identity is something to be achieved is quite interesting. on the one hand, it may simply be a matter of semantics. there is considerable convergence in both authors position that identity is something that one works out. whether discovered or achieved, narrative identity is the result of an active process of meaning-making within the flow of events and experiences of life. on the other hand, there is a sense in ricoeur that narrative identity is not something that is entirely in our grasp. there remains a certain mystery to our being, which escapes even the meaning-making ability of our temporal reflective grasp. this point is made clear through ricoeur’s example of the limit cases of fiction, and by extension, the limit cases of life. recall that, at these limits, identity was divorced from anchorage to character and sameness. this is the dark night of identity when narrative coherence is muddled and the question “who am i?” resounds in the emptiness of appropriate answers. what this example of the dark night seems to suggest is that, even if a perfectly coherent life can be imagined, the question “who am i?” would still retain a measure of unanswerability. the question of ascription and imputation is not closed off by the power of our temporal reflective gaze. third, both ricoeur and carr seem to agree that selfhood entails taking up the responsibility for not only living one’s life story authentically, but for choosing that story wisely. as ricoeur points out, we are beings “entangled in stories” (ricoeur, 1991a, p. 30), and some measure of intentionality is involved in finding our own truth, or our unique guiding narrative. somehow “the wandering that may well result from the self’s confrontation with a multitude of models for action and life” (ricoeur, 1994, p. 167) must be halted. ricoeur (1994) further writes: between the imagination that says, “i can try anything” and the voice that says, “everything is possible but not everything is beneficial…” a muted discord is sounded. it is this discord that the act of promising transforms into a fragile concordance: “i can try anything,” to be sure, but “here is where i stand!” (pp. 167-168) at stake in the choice of life story is one’s responsibility to the “other” in life – family, neighbor, the stranger, the impoverished, and the earth. that is the pervading horizon for the search for selfhood – what kind of person for others do i understand myself to be, and do i want to be! however, carr and ricoeur diverge (among other places) on one essential point – the way in which narrative identity is established. ricoeur understands narrative identity as something samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 8 mediated. short of being paralyzed in the face of the myriad of stories that compete for one’s attention, human beings need the break from this existential realm to the imaginative thoughtexperiment realm of literature. the return to life (mimesis iii) will hopefully be from a more informed and wise perspective. in contrast, david carr does not explicitly establish the mediation of literature as necessary in the process of selfhood. rather, he emphasizes that one’s main task is “telling and retelling, to ourselves and to others, the story of what we are about and what we are (carr, 1986, p. 97). carr seems therefore to privilege the role of everyday life narratives in contrast to ricoeur’s literary narratives. carr’s thesis may, in the final analysis, suffer from this lack of a theory of literary narrative, particularly if it is to serve as a comprehensive narrative theory. this may be beyond what the author set out to achieve in his time, narrative and history; the work seems to be bracketed by the task of responding to the standard theoretic position (the “standard view”) that he outlines. carr makes little room for a determined questioning of how literary narratives relate to everyday life narratives, à la ricoeur’s triple-mimesis. that, in my opinion, is the most significant critique of carr’s ideas, if they are to serve as a theory of narrative. they may more adequately be conceived as a theory of life narrative, explicating how coherence/identity/a sense of selfhood is achieved on a day-to-day basis at the level of ordinary introspection. indeed, conceived as a theory of life narrative, carr’s work is of supreme importance. the average human being spends much more time in his/her head than in reading books. the kind of temporal reflective gaze by which carr asserts we pull together a life story, might better capture how the average persons finds meaning on an ongoing basis. 6 this discussion flows naturally into the following revelation: the inescapability from the cultural signs and symbols that mediate human life and understanding. this is where the divergence between ricoeur and carr’s position may be better perceived as characterized by nuance rather than discord. ricoeur argues for the privileged mediation of literature, but maintains that it is just that – a privileged mediation. in this way, he leaves room for other means of mediating narrative identity. he makes this point in a quote that warrants repeating. “self-knowledge,” he claims “is an interpretation; self interpretation, in its turn, finds in narrative, among other signs and symbols, a privileged mediation” (ricoeur, 1991b, p. 188, emphasis added). ricoeur does not elucidate on the constituent elements of the set of “other signs and symbols,” but the implication that mediation extends beyond the literary world is inescapable. the fact that cultural artifacts can shape human identity is implied in ricoeur’s mimesis i, which insists that human beings are birthed into a world of stories. we are beings-immersed-in-stories, and these stories set the symbolic landscape within which society and human relationship can 6 this, of course, is not to belittle the significance, or the interplay, of literary narrative. it is virtually impossible to escape being shaped by it (at least indirectly). even if one never read such an archetypal tale as the three little pigs, one could surely learn the benefits of proper planning from the mores and norms one’s socio-cultural milieu. but we do read, everything from novels to sacred texts, and so are directly shaped by the ethical-imaginary world of literature. notwithstanding, human reflection is far more prosaic than reading. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 9 subsist harmoniously. 7 but it is also possible to arrive at this role of cultural artifact from carr’s thesis. indeed, one can extrapolate from his observation of the narrative configuration of human experience, events and actions, the conclusion that cultural symbols that shape human life can successfully do so because they are experienced as narrative themselves. they help story and restory our existence. they shape our reality as we engage them through the protentionalretentional gaze that unifies our experience. literary fiction is one such artifact that is particularly important in modern western post-enlightenment culture. but, the matrix of mediation can make room for other cultural forms that represent poetic configurations of life. a simple, yet powerful example is the transcultural symbol of sharing a meal. anthropologists would attest to the significance of communal dining in history. it is in many ways foundational to reinforcing the norms, codes, and mores that are the basis of family life, and more broadly human society. in what follows, i explore the way in which a meal can function as mediating self-understanding. my data is extracted from the plot of danish writer isak dinesen’s (1993) babette’s feast. as stated in the introduction, i approach the text at the level of the world being narrated, rather than at the level of textual criticism. in short, my analysis invites what keen (2006) calls narrative empathy: to get into the world of one of the characters in the plot – general loewenhielm – and the atmosphere of the fabled feast, so as to glean how the latter, as an event of beauty, worked to re-figure or re-story the general’s life. 8 babette’s feast dinesen situates her masterful narrative in a small, puritanical norwegian village – berlevaag – where two elderly sisters (martine and philippa) living a frugal existence, take into their home a french refugee (babette). after unexpectedly winning a large sum of money, babette prepares a prodigal feast of french cuisine for her hosts, crafted from the finest ingredients sourced from her home country. besides the two sisters, the guest list comprises a motley collection of villagers, united by longstanding allegiances to the deceased patriarch of their religious community (father to martine and philippa). 7 ricoeur (1971) has also ruminated on the nature of human action as a form of text. while he does not explicitly consider the ramifications of this thesis for his ideas on narrative, i suggest that, indirectly, his work on the textual qualities of action may provide theoretical grounds for considering how action – as cultural artifact and text – configures human life, and how it does so according to a narrative logic. 8 my choice of babette’s feast and my focus on general loewenhielm are for illustrative purposes. however, the choice is not arbitrary. dinesen’s classic tale is about how a transcultural symbol – a shared meal – may serve, through its consummate artistry, to refigure human life and clarify self-understanding. the meal’s symbolic potency is unveiled as the reader grows in appreciation of the storied lives gathered around the table. by focusing on the character of general loewenhielm, i am able to suggest one way that cultural symbols achieve the refiguring of life narratives – through aesthetic appeal or beauty. the general is particularly suited for bringing out this theme since he is the only one at dinner who truly appreciates the contingent bonanza of gustatory delights bestowed by babette’s hand. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 10 also attending is general lorens loewenhielm – a well-decorated military-man, cultural aesthete and past suitor of a young martine. his significance to the dinner’s plot is that, among the guests, he is the only one able to truly appreciate the singularly splendid quality and contingency of the meal. indeed, this revelation occasions a remarkable turn in the general’s selfunderstanding and a move towards self-reconciliation. the remainder of the essay illustrates how the narrative of the general’s life was refigured by the deep aesthetic of babette’s feast. 9 general loewenhielm: refigured by beauty on page 44 of dinesen’s text, the general is portrayed as driving to martine and philippa’s dinner in berlevaag, having returned from a parisian post to recuperate at his aunt’s house. he is going through a dark night of identity. in the twilight of an acclaimed life, he broods over his own mortality, over the perspicacity of the decisions of his youthful self, and over the apparent vanity of his subsequent life. dinesen describes the general’s existential restlessness as an anxious musing: he was a moral person, loyal to his king, his wife and his friends, an example to everybody. but there were moments when it seemed to him that the world was not a moral, but a mystic, concern. he looked into the mirror, examined the row of decorations on his breasts and sighed to himself: “vanity, vanity, all is vanity!” (dinesen, 1993, p. 45) this discernment of a mystical dimension of life is evocatively captured elsewhere in the chapter through the metaphor of sight. in his youth, loewenhielm had chosen career over a labor of love for the beautiful martine. the older general now fears that, with this choice, he had forfeited the “gift of second sight” – the vision of life’s transcendent contours beyond the veil of daily and material concerns. having experienced deeply what the world had to offer (“first sight”), the general anticipates a deeper truth: that life was more than concern for wealth, adventure, and accolade. 9 i recognize that, in focusing on the general, i am neglecting the interestingly complex and nuanced lives of the other characters, including the ways in which the meal was pivotal to their own coming to renewed self-awareness. presumably, other themes besides beauty could be developed out of these narratives. for instance, analyzing how babette’s character was impacted by the meal would be intriguing, particularly in a conceptual framework that attends to the interplay of narrative and issues of power. preparing the feast was deeply cathartic for babette because her artistic genius was stifled by a life of servitude and austerity in the home of martine and philippe. unfortunately, this genius was only apparent to the general and, arguably, rendered subject to his validation. from an alternative standpoint, one may also argue that there is an exchange of power between babette and the general occasioned by the hospitality of the meal, with the latter’s felt-sense of superiority at the dinner table, in some respects, acceding with the recognition of the culinary mastery of the former. issues of gender relations, socioeconomic status, religion, culture and ethnicity all converge to shape the unique power dynamics that are central to dinesen’s story and that are impacted by the meal event. indeed, there are many possible directions to be taken in a discussion of power and the narrative overlays of meal and dinner guests. prudence dictates, however, that such treatments – compelling as they may be – are better served in a separate essay. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 11 he approaches martine and philippa’s home hoping to expunge his existence of its inherent contradictions. he would experience again the sparse, rustic milieu that had once held love’s invitation – with its traditional meager cuisine of haddock and a glass of water. he would affirm how miserable such a life would have been. in this way, the brooding general would “make his account with young lorens loewenhielm… [and] let the youth prove to him, once and for all, that thirty-one years ago he had made the right choice” (dinesen, 1993, p. 46) when he spurned love and the simple life for career and glory. in terms of themes developed in this essay, one finds here an example of someone deeply at odds with the prevailing narratives of his life. he was, as ricoeur would put it, a being-entangled-instories: his life comprising a narrative imbrication of war glories, royal favor, a stable but unsatisfying marriage, career success and societal prestige, all tempered by a deep disquiet and an unreconciled story of long-lost love. general loewenhielm’s character exemplifies a life in search of a new narrative, or in search of re-storying. life, as a whole, is experienced as discordant, even when individual events (like a remembered dinner at paris’ café anglais) and life achievements (such as his military career) maintain their narrative cohesion, and even as the promise of a nascent wholeness (second sight) emerges in fleeting moments. there are strong resonances with both ricoeur’s and carr’s arguments here. the general’s eventual self-reconciliation would synthesize this heterogeneity of his life – with its discordant and concordant notes. narrative refiguring would also reconcile the general with the moral decision imputed to his younger self. in the crisis of self that ensued from his failed relationship with martine, the young loewenhielm made a vocational decision in favor of career. in essence, this is the “here is where i stand!” that ricoeur (1994, p. 168) states is the core assertion of moral selfhood. it is precisely this assertion that needed revisiting and reaffirming in the older general’s mind. babette’s feast occasioned this sense of narrative coherence that the general sought. but how did the meal produce a breakthrough in self-understanding? what elements specifically came into play? first, the feast could be considered as bringing together diverse constituents in a kind of plot. it brought together elements of surprise; mystery; delight; exquisite food; cheerless guests; puritanical villagers; an adorned general; diverse worlds (paris and norway); time remembered and time present; as well as the various aims, hopes, and fears of the participants. certainly, unusual and heterogeneous elements are being synthesized with culinary splendor into a unified story. it must also be pointed out that the feast was not simply reducible to a meal, however exquisite. it was rather the composite experience of food, fellowship, and festivity, which gave the event a layered, thick, and narrative quality. second, the general’s familiarity with the cuisine established the dialectic of concord and discord that unfolded with the feast. he knew the food intimately, having dined at the café anglais in paris where it appears babette was lead chef. he was the only one at the table that appreciated its exquisiteness and was at home with its subtleties. who else at the table knew (or cared about) veuve cliquot 1860? in effect, the meal allowed the general’s story of prestige and privilege to continue. yet, paralleling this congruence was a sense that the meal was misplaced. this was not a prestigious café in paris, but the humble abode of two lutheran sisters in berlesamuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 12 vaag. colonel galliffet and the other distinguished guests from memories of the café anglais were not at table. indeed, the lavish meal was seemingly squandered on the unsophisticated palettes of the villagers. this surprising and discordant coincidence of rich familiar fare with rustic setting occasioned a cathartic “pause” by the general. to make the point in terms of a key thesis in this essay: the multilayered feast was a compositional act that, in its enjoyment (akin to ricoeur’s reading-act in literary narrative), engendered a felt sense of wonder, surprise, and excitement that would compel a re-assessment (or re-figuration) of the general’s narrative understanding of life. his coparticipation (with the villagers) in the feast enabled the narrative re-figuring or re-storying of the general’s life. 10 the general’s felt-sense of wonder, surprise, and excitement effectively clued him into deep truths about the beneficence of life (what he calls “grace”). to be sure, a process of reflection accompanied the felt-sense. in effect, the general needed to make reasonable sense of the events as they were transpiring, even if he had already experienced an inner (pre-reflective) conviction of the presence of a new truth. the fact that refiguration emerged through employment of his mental faculties and through bodily awareness is significant, and is, i contend, consequent to the particular form of mediation – a feast. the distinct texture of the unique compositional artifact that is a feast – the gustatory delights and the relationships cultivated, furthered and restored – are all highly emotive of the embodied mind. it is also significant that the result of this sensing-reflective process is the recognition of a gift, or of a grace. 11 the passage in question, which heralds the general’s transition to refiguration, is memorable and poetic: we have all of us been told that grace is to be found in the universe. but in our human foolishness and short-sightedness we imagine divine grace to be finite. for this reason we tremble … before making our choice in life, and after having made it again tremble in fear of having chosen wrong. but the moment comes when our eyes are opened, and we see and realize that grace is infinite. grace, my friends, demands nothing from us but that we shall await it with confidence and acknowledge it in gratitude. grace, brothers, makes no conditions and singles out none of us in particular; grace takes us all to its bosom and proclaims general amnesty. see! that which we have chosen is given us, and that which we have refused is, also and at the same time, granted us. ay, that which we have rejected is poured upon us abundantly. for mercy and truth have met together, and righteousness and bliss have kissed one another! (dinesen, 1993, p. 52) 10 it is important to note that the general was not the author of the feast. indeed, the feast itself escaped the control of any one “author.” obviously babette played the central role in creating the meal. but the setting, ambience (or lack of it), conversation, relationships – everything that made the occasion into a feast – were co-authored by all persons present. 11 in a general sense, “grace” seems to refer in the text to a gratuitous gift or to the munificence of life. however, other interpretations, particularly religious interpretations, are proper to the text. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 13 the gift of second sight had undoubtedly and unexpectedly erupted into his life at that moment. with it, he perceived a grace – a gratuitous largesse – permeating everyday moral concerns (the realm of first sight). and, again, it was the discordant-concordant feast (food, fellowship, festivity) that inspired this revelation. the fact that his new self-understanding entailed an unexpected transcendent dimension is remarkable. not only did the general evidence a re-storying of his life, but also the narrative unity of his life took on a new and unexpected trajectory in perceiving life’s innate sacramentality. indeed, i propose that it is the contingent quality of beauty in the meal that inspired the tangential break in the general’s life narrative. 12 hopefully this thesis is apparent from the arguments made so far. nonetheless, a certain rephrasing is warranted. babette reveals in the conclusion of the story that she is an artist. she is the creator of an exquisite meal, and the co-creator of a transformative feast that was efficacious in leading the spirit of the guests beyond the existential confines of place and time. it mediated the recognition that there was a transcending “more” to life. further, this “more”o was beyond the compositional grasp of babette or the dinner guests. it was certainly adventitious – the grace-full act of an ultimate author of life. in short, the desirability of the feast extended beyond the contours of the meal, to include what may be considered a contingent spiritual in-breaking. as such, i consider the feast to be an event of beauty – beautiful not only in the artistic qualities of the meal, but also in the eruption (from the general’s perspective) of an inspiring and reconciling truth. following ricoeur’s definition, the feast was an event inasmuch as it contributed to the unfolding of the plot of the general’s life. while the reconciliation occasioned by the dinner was largely unexpected, the evening takes on a certain “narrative necessity” for the general by the end of dinesen’s account. 13 but the feast was also an event of beauty, evoking gustatory desire, as well as a sense of wonder and awe. after all, the general himself describes the power of the chef of the café anglais (babette) to transform a dinner into “a love affair of the noble and romantic category in which one no longer distinguishes between bodily and spiritual appetite or satiety!” (dinesen, 1993, p. 52) and once more, it is the feast, understood now as a thing of prodigal beauty, which brought a sense of meaning to general loewenhielm’s life, rescuing him from its myopic interpretation. the sublime and mundane, transcendent and immanent, grace and human life, they all cohere in the narrative of the meal, to re-story a life. rich fare indeed! 12 there are strong spiritual resonances in babette’s feast that cannot be substantially addressed in this essay. indeed, my use of the term beauty may offer an entry point into a theological hermeneutic of dinesen’s text. for an extended treatment on a theology of beauty see hart (2003). 13 for more on ricoeur’s distinction between an event and an occurrence in terms of narrative necessity, see (ricoeur, 1994, p. 142) samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 14 summary i have attempted to address the issue of self-understanding, identified by ricoeur as one of the three dimensions of a literary work, through an examination of the ricoeur-carr discussions on narrativity. i concluded that the two authors converge at a significant point – that selfhoodidentity may be mediated by a host of cultural artifacts, which themselves are experienced as narrative. where ricoeur privileges literary and historical fiction as archetypal in his framework, carr mentions the role of everyday life narratives as playing the mediational role. my excursion into the world of babette’s feast through the eyes of general loewenhielm was meant to illustrate the thesis that a feast, as a cultural artifact of symbolic weight, can occasion the narrative re-storying of a life. the details of babette’s feast however reveal something particularly interesting – that sharing a meal is particularly potent because it may engage the individual’s entire corporeal existence – mental, physical, and spiritual. in this way the feast, as a cultural artifact, contrasts in its mediational role from literary text. for what the former loses to the latter in terms of a proliferation of “imaginative variations,” it gains, in its holistic engagement of the person. in short, mediation is channeled not simply through the employment of mental faculties, but also through corporeality, felt-sense, and spiritual sensitivity. this observation is an important extension of ricoeur’s and (to a lesser extent) carr’s theses. references carr, d. (1986). time, narrative, and history. bloomington, in: indiana university press. carr, d., taylor, c., & ricoeur, p. (1991). discussion: ricoeur on narrative. in d. wood (ed.), on paul ricoeur: narrative and interpretation (pp. 160-187). london, uk: routledge. dinesen, i. (1993). babette's feast. in anecdotes of destiny and ehrengard. new york, ny: vintage books. hart, d. b. (2003). the beauty of the infinite: the aesthetics of christian truth. grand rapids, mi: mich. w.b. eerdmans. kearney, r. (2006). parsing narrative story, history, life. human studies, 29(4), 477-490. keen, s. (2006). a theory of narrative empathy. narrative, 14(3), 207-236. ricoeur, p. (1971). the model of the text: meaningful action considered as a text. social research, 38(3), 529-562. ricoeur, p. (1991a). life in quest of narrative. in d. wood (ed.), on paul ricoeur: narrative and interpretation (pp. 20-33). london, uk: routledge. ricoeur, p. (1991b). narrative identity. in d. wood (ed.), on paul ricoeur: narrative and interpretation (pp. 188-199). london, uk: routledge. samuel journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 1 15 ricoeur, p. (1994). the self and narrative identity. in oneself as another, trans k. blamey, (pp. 140-168). chicago, il: university of chicago press. microsoft word laing corrected proof.docx 1 university of calgary corresponding author: catherine m. laing email: laingc@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 31, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 stories from cancer camp: tales of glitter and gratitude catherine m. laing1 & nancy j. moules1 abstract each year in canada, approximately 1400 children and adolescents under the age of 20 are diagnosed with cancer. it is well recognized that childhood cancer affects the entire family, and innumerable challenges accompany this diagnosis. in recognition of the challenges that accompany this disease, cancer camps started in the 1970s to help children and their families escape the rigidity and severity of cancer treatment. very little is known about how camps affect these families, and to that end, a philosophical hermeneutic study was conducted to understand the meaning of children’s cancer camps for the child with cancer and the family. six families were interviewed to bring understanding to this topic, and while the research included findings related to the concept of play, fit and acceptance, grief, and community, this paper will detail the finding related to storytelling and the reshaping of experiences that happens by virtue of being at camp. keywords hermeneutics, storytelling, cancer camp, pediatric oncology in response to the challenges and stress of childhood cancer, children’s cancer camps arose in the 1970s as a way for children and their families to escape the rigorousness of cancer treatment (bluebond-langner, perkel, goertzel, nelson, & mcgeary, 1990; kids cancer care foundation of alberta, 2012). cancer camps are designed to meet the needs of the whole family at each stage in the cancer experience, including survivorship or bereavement (kids cancer care foundation of alberta, 2012). currently in canada, eight cancer camps provide service to 5,252 children and their families (canadian association of pediatric oncology camps, 2012), and as more children are surviving childhood cancer, the need for specialized camps and community laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 2 programs continues to grow (laing & moules, 2013). our intent in this paper is to describe one of the findings of the first author’s philosophical hermeneutic doctoral research around understanding the meaning of children’s cancer camps for the child with cancer and the family. while the doctoral thesis included findings related to: the concept of play at cancer camp (both philosophically and theoretically) (laing, 2012); the fit and acceptance that children and families find at camp (laing & moules, 2013); the solidarity of the community – the “camp family” – as one that creates intense, healing bonds (laing & moules, in press); and grief as something that children and families experience differently, this paper will detail the finding related to storytelling, both by children and parents, as a means of re-shaping and understanding traumatic experiences. background information and literature review while very few studies related to children’s cancer camps have been conducted, there are many anecdotal accounts of the benefit of cancer camps. a search of nursing, education, family, and psychology databases yielded 16 studies pertaining specifically to children’s cancer camps; in other words, very little is understood about the effects of cancer camps on the child and family (laing & moules, 2013). of the available literature, topics such as self-concept (benson, 1987; kessell, resnick, & blum, 1985; murray, 2001), psychosocial impact (packman et al., 2008; wellisch, crater, wiley, belin, & weinstein, 2006), medical knowledge (carpenter, sahler, & davis, 1990; bluebond-langner et al., 1990), and other measurable constructs have been examined. most studies report either a neutral (or undetectable) effect from camp, or a marginal improvement on the construct in question, most relating this to self-reported limitations of insufficiently powered sample sizes and lack of control groups. more research has been conducted in the fields of outdoor programming and therapeutic camping – a term used to describe a purposeful approach to recreation, often involving marginalized or vulnerable populations. a meta-analysis of outdoor education programs suggested that selfconcept, academic performance, leadership, interpersonal skills, personality, and adventuresomeness were all mildly positively correlated to outdoor programming (hattie, marsh, neill, & richards, 1997). recently, certain childhood disease groups have organized camps for children specific to their disease (e.g., camp huff n’ puff [asthma], camp maska [nephrology]). there has been a significant amount of research pertaining to these therapeutic camps (e.g., mishna, michalski, & cummings, 2001; walker & pearman, 2009; welch, carlson, larson, & fena, 2007), with most researchers concluding that these camps have a positive effect on the children for whom they are targeted. childhood cancer, however, is a unique disease, and with it comes unique challenges, differences, and outcomes that must be considered with respect to camp (laing & moules, 2013). to the best of our knowledge, this was the first qualitative study undertaken in search of understanding the meaning of these camps to children with cancer and their families. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 3 research design method the research question for this study was, “how might we understand the meaning of children's cancer camps on children and their families?” this research was guided by philosophical hermeneutics, defined as the art, tradition, and practice of interpretation (gadamer, 1960/1989), as developed by hans-georg gadamer (1900-2002). hermeneutics is interested in human experience, and offers a way to know and understand the world and, thus, the topic (gadamer, 1960/1989). it is a sophisticated method of research and approach to understanding within the human sciences, and, particularly in health care, hermeneutics has been shown to have invaluable applied utility (moules, mccaffrey, morck, & jardine, 2011). hermeneutics helps us make sense of the particulars (moules, 2002) and arrive at deeper understandings of how children’s cancer camps, for example, impact children with cancer and their families. hermeneutics, as an approach to research, is an interpretive methodology, a reflexive inquiry, where the researcher is not considered a separate entity, or non-influencing factor, from that which she/he is researching. the “data,” ricoeur (1981) offered, never stand alone as their meaning depends on the researcher and the reader. hermeneutics seeks to understand rather than explain. recruitment of participants the appropriate individuals to include in a hermeneutic inquiry are ones that can best inform understanding of the topic (known as purposive sampling) as it is the researcher’s aim to elicit a richness of data through the experiences of the participants (laing & moules, 2013). the participants for this research included children with cancer and their families who attended the 2012 kids cancer care (kcc) foundation’s camp kindle in the summer camping season. seven families were contacted about participation in this study by the kcc family liaison, with 6 families (table 1) agreeing to participate (equaling 19 participants in total). upon stating their agreement to the family liaison, the interested families were then contacted by me (first author) to further explain the study. it is worth noting here for clarity, that for many families, cancer camp is not a one-time event. kids cancer care (like similar philanthropic organizations) offers weekend camps and other events throughout the year, in hopes to engage, support, and connect children with cancer and their families. data generation after informed written consent was obtained, i conducted semi-structured interviews at the location of the participant’s choosing (three interviews occurred in the participants’ homes, one interview was at a public library, one was at a local recreation complex, and one was at a coffee shop). each interview took 1 to 1 ½ hours, and was recorded and transcribed for ongoing analysis, and basic demographics of the participants were also obtained. after each interview, field notes were written to capture contextual details to assist with the data analysis. all interviews took place within one month of camp attendance. in addition, i attended camp as a participant observer on 6 occasions throughout the 2012 summer camping season which generated further data that was incorporated into the analysis. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 4 table 1 participant characteristics analysis and interpretation of data data analysis is synonymous with interpretation in the tradition of hermeneutics (moules, 2002; moules, laing, mccaffrey, tapp, & strother, 2012), and arriving at interpretations is a rigorous practice bringing together knowledge, information, conversation, experience, and data. to understand the process of how interpretations are developed, the concepts of fusion of horizons and the hermeneutic circle merit discussion. the fusion of horizons, where “horizon” is a metaphor for how reality is perceived and interpreted (austgard, 2012), is the coming together of more than one understanding of the topic, coupled with the curiosity and desire of the researcher to understand the topic in a new way (binding & tapp, 2008; koch, 1996). the hermeneutic circle is the metaphorical representation of understanding the whole by grasping its parts and by comprehending the meaning of the parts, by considering the whole (crotty, 1998). this movement in and out of “parts and wholes” is circular, recursive, and involves the researchers as an integral part of the circle. the hermeneutic circle invites the researcher to consider the particulars participants family structure present at interview status original diagnosis family a mother child 1: 9y child 2: 11y child 3: 14 y mother, child 1, child 2, child 3 child 2 is cancer survivor x 10 years; 5th time at camp wilms’ tumor family b mother father child 1: 5y child 2: 8y mother, father, child 1, child 2 child 2 currently on active treatment; 3rd time at camp leukemia family c mother father child 1: 10y child 2: 12y child 3: 14y mother child 2 off therapy x 5 years; 4th time at camp brain tumor mcmahon family mother father child 1: deceased child 2: 9y child 3: 12y child 4: 15y child 5: 17y mother, father, child 2, child 3, child 4, child 5 bereaved family. child 1 passed away from cancer 6 years ago (aged 2 years); 6th time at camp leukemia family e mother father child 1: 5y child 2: 7y mother, father, child (age 7) child 2 had just completed active therapy; 2nd time at camp brain tumor family f mother father child 1: 9y child 2: 10y mother child 2 off therapy x 1 year; 3rd time at camp brain tumor laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 5 of the topic in the context of the familiar, and similarly, the familiar in the context of the particulars (gadamer, 1960/1989; grondin, 1999/2003; moules, 2002). this movement in and out of the data, extensive readings and re-readings, reflection, dialogue, and challenging taken-forgranted assumptions allows for consideration of that which might not have been initially visible, and enhances the understanding of the topic (laing & moules, 2013; moules, 2002). the remainder of this manuscript is related directly to the findings around the concept of storytelling that occurs at children’s cancer camps. it is appropriate that, at this point, hermeneutics, as a topic, will disappear into the background while the topic of storytelling takes center stage (moules, 2002). in the next section, we offer an engagement in the world of children’s cancer camps and the lives of these families who live with the diagnosis of childhood cancer. interpretive analysis children never get to the point, they surround it. the importance of the point is the landscape of it. you begin discussing “the rainfall of vancouver island” and somebody has an uncle who lives there. and there is an uncle in alberta who has a zillion cows, some chickens, and a horse (we get to feed the chickens and ride the horse), which brings us to an uncle in saskatchewan, who has a house where deer pass the kitchen window every morning (he take us out and shows us where they go). if there were no uncles on vancouver island it would never rain there. (stevens, 1981, cited in jardine & clandinin, 1987, p. 477) i heard stories from children during the research interviews but even more so at camp. on the way to and from activities, during activities, during mealtimes, during “quiet time” – stories filled any potentially quiet and empty space of camp. children told each other stories, they told the counselors stories, they told me stories, and at times, frankly, it was overwhelming and consuming for my quiet, adult nature, but the more i thought about it and watched what was happening, the more i was able to see how this normal, unassuming occurrence was serving a very important role. because, as stevens (1981) said, “children never get to the point, they surround it. the importance of the point is the landscape of it” (cited in jardine & clandinin, 1987, p. 477). laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 6 stevens’ (1981) poem, particularly the first four lines, has had me pause to consider “points” and “landscapes,” of stories. with children, the importance of the point is the landscape of it; in other words, it is in their stories where the value lies. so common were their stories, that i almost missed them. i almost did not appreciate their importance because they were so pervasive, much like when something is so common one stops “seeing” it after a while. the stories of these children were not “just” stories; there was a lot happening in these stories, however in order to understand the profundity of them, one must first appreciate the tradition of storytelling. storytelling is said to have been around since the development of language. it has been used for centuries as a vehicle of communication and a way of passing wisdom along through the generations (koch, 1998). “stories are how we learn. the progenitors of the world's religions understood this, handing down our great myths and legends from generation to generation” (mooney & holt, 1996, p. 7). they are an important form of communication through which individuals, communities, and society conveys important messages, entertainment, knowledge, and experience to others (bowles, 1995). stories assist with reaffirming our lives and experiences, helping us connect with our inner selves and others (atkinson, 2002). “stories” and “narratives” are often used interchangeably in the literature (riley & hawe, 2005). people lead storied lives (connelly & clandinin, 1990), and frank (2000) suggested that people convey and tell stories rather than narratives. wiltshire (1995) defined stories as personal experiences, informally and subjectively recounted, while rubin and rubin (2005) offered that stories are purposeful, and have the ability to change. narratives, conversely, have been defined as being more structured and formal (wiltshire, 1995), a partial and formed description of a larger story (rubin & rubin, 2005), and, with respect to research, structured and formal accounts containing researcher additions and omissions (east, jackson, o’brien, & peters, 2010). while i appreciate the distinction between the terms, for the purposes of this discussion, i have chosen to use the term story, as i believe it best speaks to the nature of what it is children and families are doing – they are telling their stories. the stories of the children: feeding chickens and riding horses perhaps most fittingly, it is appropriate that i begin this part of the discussion by way of a story, of sorts. when i interviewed the mcmahon1 family, the youngest child, christina, nine years old, sat quietly at the end of the couch near her dad. i was aware of her watching me, constantly, but she said little, usually being drowned out by her more gregarious older sisters and brother. she was wearing her camp shirt signed by fellow campers and counselors, and when i commented on it she beamed with pride, clearly happy i noticed. christina contributed little for the first twothirds of the interview, and i got the impression she was happy to sit on the sidelines. something happened, though, toward the end and christina, all of a sudden, dominated the interview. as i reviewed the transcript, i counted thirteen times she spoke in the last third of the interview, versus two times in the first two thirds. i offer the following section of transcript not for the content, specifically, but more for the “dynamic” of what was happening: 1 the mcmahon family has asked me to refer to them by their real names instead of using pseudonyms. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 7 christina: also one of the things that i really liked was um, we were doing these super skills and i was in the studio and i learned a different way of finger-netting and um, these other people wanted me to show them how to do it, then all the people wanted to do it. cml (interviewer): so you got to teach everybody how to do it? christina: yeah, and well, i told one of the counselors how to do it and she, like, some people from my group, we added all ours together. older sister: tell her how long it was when you added it together. christina: um, well mine, it was like a square and i had different colors, red, purple, blue, and i could jump over it, and then a lot of people wanted me to make, help them make some, and then like, they had fun. cml: so you got pretty good at that! older sister: they like, linked all their finger-nettings together, it was from one goal post to the other goal post, it was long. christina: (laughing) yeah, it was long enough that like, a lot of people liked it, they had fun. and her group (pointing to older sister), they were doing face painting and they liked it. older sister: every day we would have a new theme so on the day of her show and tell we would have diva faces…glitter everywhere…and we had flowers, we did a tiger, we did an old man face… christina: um, there were other super skill groups like…(everyone starts talking at once, can’t make anything out). christina was engaged with me and telling me a story, her story, of something she did at camp. i, frankly, had no idea what she was describing at the time (it took me listening, and re-listening to the recording several times to understand what she was talking about). she talked quickly, her body leaning toward me, her eyes locked on mine, willing me to stay with her story. the kind of story nine year olds tell, with ambiguous beginnings, middles, and endings – the kind of story you need to “peripherally” listen to, because you lose the point when you listen straight on. the “point,” i realized, was about how she took a leadership role in her group, and taught others a skill she had mastered. the point for her, however, lay in the landscape of the story, the fingernetting, the colors, the fact that everyone had fun – not at all about mastery and leadership. both of christina’s parents commented on her sudden talkativeness during the interview: christina: some of these people, like, i’ve had the same leader for two years, for sparks and kindling 1, last year and this year, and we did the same thing, and well, i remember we did the scavenger hunt and we all had a lot of fun, like, we traded people – well, only my group and another group, and like, this one time it said “find a robot watch” and it was rocket’s birthday that day, and orca called over rocket and so we started singing happy birthday, and then we noticed the robot watch and were like, “oh, there it is!” and then the climbing wall, the giant swing, the zip-line, i hadn’t done the giant swing or zip line yet and it was a really good experience for me. father: you’re just a chatty cathy, i like this! mother: i’ve never heard you talk so much! her talkativeness was further punctuated after the interview was over and christina and her mother were showing me pictures and mementos of tanner, their child and brother who had died. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 8 christina remained very talkative, telling me stories about how she would accompany her brother when he needed painful procedures, and how “they didn’t let anyone into the room, but they let me in because they knew i could help calm him down.” at one point, her mother said, “this is so unlike her. she never talks this much!” and i wondered about this for many days afterwards. something had happened there, something was going on, and i was reminded of gadamer’s words, “understanding begins when something addresses us,” (gadamer, 1960/1989, p. 299), but, as jardine (2012) pointed out, “it only begins there” (p. 4). in order to understand what is happening when we tell our stories, it is important to look beyond just the words. the stories we tell are not to say what we know, but to find out what we know, and in telling stories, “we try to make sense of life, like we try to make sense of a text when we interpret it” (widdershoven, 1993, p. 9). stories of illness (in christina’s case, of her brother’s illness) help make sense and give meaning to dramatic and confusing times of life (abma, 2005; bosticco & thompson, 2005). we are our stories, and abram (2010) reminded us that, historically, “spoken stories were the living encyclopedias of our oral ancestors” (p. 10), often carrying practical knowledge like instructions for the hunting of various animals, which plants were good to eat and which were poisonous, and how to construct a winter shelter. we come from a tradition of storytelling that served a practical purpose of how to live in the world. our stories today, though not often practical in the sense of how to construct a winter shelter or avoid consuming poisonous plants, remain practical in the sense of making sense and increasing understanding of personal experiences (frank, 1995), and promoting awareness of, and reflection on, life circumstances (carlick & biley, 2004). they still teach us how to live in the world, particularly when faced with the task of making sense of illness or tragedy. the process of telling a story is interesting, given the fallibility of memory is such that people remember a story the way they wish to remember it (kitzinger, 2004). stories are subjective, wrote sandelowski (1993), and they are influenced by environments, social situations, changing perspectives, the audience, and the purpose of relating the story. when telling a story, we make choices about what to include, highlighting some events and omitting others (bauman, 2004). it is precisely this, however, the subjectivity, inclusion or exclusion of events, and the personal choices that are made in the telling, that makes it a story. like christina, when these children told their stories, they were making sense of their lives. their stories were helping them process, understand, and deal with profound events – the kind of events, like being diagnosed with cancer as a child or losing a brother to cancer, that are difficult to make sense of, even for adults. i am not suggesting that their stories were always serious or even about cancer most of the time; i believe, however that, like christina, sometimes the landscapes of their stories, the hidden points, best seen by sideways glances, were what helped them reflect on, and make sense of, childhood cancer. camp provided innumerable opportunities, spaces, and places in which the children could fill with their stories, and it was as if, by the end, they had found a new way to live in the world. the storyteller does not stand outside of all stories as the purveyor who then decides what information to embody in a story but stands in the story as its teller. the story must be conceived as a recollection of community, a recollection of belonging together. everyone, teacher and child, laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 9 has a story to tell. the importance of the storytelling analogy is that it contains in itself the selfrecognition of being an analogy. of course, it must do this because, after all, what is a story but an analogy – an analogue which gathers for us, teacher and children, the most significant and true elements of our being in the world. (jardine & clandinin, 1987, p. 480) the stories of parents: “even the earth trembles now and again” (sogyal rinpoche, 1993) storytelling, or sharing of stories, does not just take place among the children, at camp. sharing of stories is another way in which parents too, benefit from the camp experience. i wish to tilt the angle of this lens, just slightly, and focus not as much on the stories of the parents, per se, rather on underlying message i heard from parents. i guess for me, points of gratefulness too, just that recognition of, and i don’t know how many times i said it, but the willingness of people to sacrifice their money, their time, whatever, so that people like us can have a safe place to go. i don’t know how many times i cried when i was there [camp] (crying). and, you know, i went up to [the people who spoke at the] grand opening and i just i thanked them, cause i said, you know what, like, so many people give of themselves and they’ve never been through it. and i guess i find that always an amazing thing that people are willing to do it. but i’m also very, very grateful because you know, with what we’ve been through, some of these experiences, we would’ve never been able to have without that. we just wouldn’t, and so you know, there’s definitely a huge element of gratefulness (teary). (parent) there was an underlying thread of profound gratitude among the parents of the children with cancer. this gratitude, i surmise, was about many things: for the camp itself, for their children being alive and able to participate, and even for the break from their daily lives and routines. it is the kind of gratitude that is possible, i believe, only when one is able to be truly present in a moment, aware of the finitude of life. tibetan buddhism calls this concept “impermanence,” and its doctrines teach of the value of impermanence, and the importance of accepting the impermanence of our lives. ask yourself these two questions: do i remember at every moment that i am dying, and everyone and everything else is, and so treat all beings at all times with compassion? has my understanding of death and impermanence become so keen and so urgent that i am devoting every second to the pursuit of enlightenment? if you can answer `yes' to both of these, then you have really understood impermanence. (sogyal rinpoche, 1993, p. 27) i propose that many parents of children with cancer have a sense of impermanence that fills their lives. even in the face of statistics, claiming (in some cases) greater than 80% survival rates, once parents hear the words “your child has cancer,” they are forced to face and consider their child’s mortality. impermanence is not a concept only for parents of children with cancer, of course. we are all aware, to varying degrees, that our lives are limited and that nothing, in a sense, is forever. however, in this age of advanced medical technology, our youth-obsessed western culture is not inclined to often consider this. to acknowledge impermanence is to acknowledge death, and it is well documented that we, as a culture, do not do this readily. bayer (2004) reported that, in the united states between the period of 1997 to 2001, cosmetic procelaing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 10 dures increased 311% for women, and 256% for men. western culture, bayer surmised, is doing nothing to dispel fears of aging and death; if anything it is promoting and perpetuating it by continuously and unrelentingly placing such high value on the retention of youth. likewise, berger (2008) noted that youth is not only associated with beauty and illusory perfection, but also with vitality, defined as “how healthy and energetic – physically, intellectually, and socially – an individual feels” (p. 546). considering this definition of vitality, it is not difficult to see why one would fear aging and death in a culture that idolizes youth. these parents, i believe, are acutely aware of the impermanence of their child, and it is perhaps this heightened sense of impermanence and awareness of the fragility of life, that causes gratitude to the degree in which i experienced it in them. in our journey, i haven’t had a lot of connection with other people who had kids with cancer so it was pretty neat for me to be able to talk to people and, and have that um, commonality. yeah. and camp itself – i could go on and on – just, the way we were treated, the quality of the counselors, the staff. the only, the only thing i can equate it to is a mini version of, you know, disneyland, or that kind of thing – disney’s motto of “the happiest place on earth.” i mean that’s how, that’s how they are, and ah, yeah, again when you’ve been through hard stuff, being treated like that is just – i can’t say i was shocked, but it sure felt good. (parent) knowing that something will not last can be of benefit. when something is pleasant, knowing it will not last helps us to not take it for granted, be present with it, and appreciate it in the moment. when something is unpleasant, knowing that it will not last can make it more bearable. it can help us to appreciate the good, having experienced the bad. in the buddhist tradition, impermanence is one of the essential doctrines, or three marks of existence. it is the practice of recognizing that everything changes, and nothing has a fixed identity, or permanence. those who subscribe to the buddhist doctrine strive to incorporate it into their lives, using it as an instrument to penetrate deeply into reality, understanding that reality is never static, but is dynamic throughout. the realization of impermanence is paradoxically the only thing we can hold onto, perhaps our only lasting possession. it is like the sky, or the earth. no matter how much everything around us may change or collapse, they endure. say we go through a shattering emotional crisis…our whole life seems to be disintegrating…our husband or wife suddenly leaves us without warning. the earth is still there; the sky is still there. of course, even the earth trembles now and again, just to remind us we cannot take anything for granted. (sogyal rinpoche, 1993, pp. 25-26) parents, i have suggested, are acutely aware (either consciously or sub-consciously) of the impermanence that affects us all, but for most is a concept ranging from uncomfortable to terrifying. hand in hand with this awareness, i suggest, comes gratitude, albeit often at a deeply subconscious level. johnson (2009) noted that impermanence can inspire gratitude by reminding us that we are part of a larger whole. it reminds us to live life fully, each moment never to be duplicated, and never knowing when the end of our lives may be. johnson suggested that impermanence can remind us of the absurdity of life, pushing us to find a healthy balance between intentional living and not taking life too seriously. i want to be careful not to romanticize this notion too much. i am not suggesting that parents of children with cancer just accept what has laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 11 happened with a “whatever happens, happens” kind of approach. on the contrary, i believe that the perspective of impermanence and the feelings of gratitude seep in through the cracks, perhaps, like as cohen (1992) suggested, “there is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in.” camp cracks the shell of fear around parents of children with cancer, allowing the light, the gratitude, to get in, and to help unlock emotions that may, perhaps, have been locked away from the moment of diagnosis. quite simply, it feels better to be grateful than to have no gratitude. camp offers the opportunity to feel gratitude and express gratefulness. being grateful of something is indicative of a certain level of emotional health, of healing. when one is consumed with fear or anger, or full of stress, it is impossible to make room for gratitude. it is perhaps the ability to feel grateful for something, that lets a parent know they can get through the nightmare of childhood cancer. gratitude unlocks the fullness of life. it turns what we have into enough, and more. it turns denial into acceptance, chaos into order, confusion into clarity...it turns problems into gifts, failures into success, the unexpected into perfect timing, and mistakes into important events. gratitude makes sense of our past, brings peace for today and creates a vision for tomorrow. (beattie, 2000, p. 9) concluding thoughts o body swayed to music, o brightening glance, how can we tell the dancer from the dance? (yeats, 1928) we are our stories, and like the dancer and the dance, in yeats’ poem, it is difficult to differentiate ourselves from our stories. our stories link our past to our present (france & uhlin, 2006), and allow us to reflect on our world (frank, 2000; king, 2003). stories allow us to assert meaning on events, “so, one may review past events through narration and say, ‘oh now i see,' as if it were the first time” (churchill & churchill, 1982, p. 73). the telling of stories has been demonstrated to increase resilience (dean, 1995), insight (jackson & mannix, 2003), and hardiness (leseho & block, 2005). we live by stories, we also live in them. one way or another we are living the stories planted – knowingly or unknowingly – in ourselves. we live stories that either give our lives meaning or negate it with meaninglessness. if we change the stories we live by, quite possibly we change our lives. (okri, 1997, p. 46). it is, perhaps, one of the greatest gifts that camp offers the children with cancer and their families – the space, time, and opportunity to tell their stories and to come to understand the meaning of childhood cancer differently. bios dr. catherine m. laing is an assistant professor in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 12 dr. nancy j. moules is a professor in the faculty of nursing at the university of calgary. she also holds the alberta children’s hospital foundation and research institute nursing professorship in child and family centred cancer care. acknowledgement this doctoral study was funded by a generous scholarship from the alberta children’s hospital foundation to which the authors express immense gratitude. references abma, t.a. (2005). struggling with the fragility of life: a relational-narrative approach to ethics in palliative nursing. nursing ethics, 12(4), 337-348. doi:10.1191 /0969733005ne799oa abram, d. (1996). the spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world. new york, ny: vintage books. atkinson, r. (2002). the life story interview. in j. f. gubrium & j. a. holstein (eds.), handbook of interview research: context and method (pp. 121-140). thousand oaks, ca: sage. austergard, k. (2012). doing it the gadamerian way – using philosophical hermeneutics as a methodological approach in nursing science. scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 26(4), 829-834. retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca /store/doi/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00993.x bauman, z. (2004). wasted lives: modernity and its outcasts. cambridge, ma: polity press. bayer, k. (2004). the anti aging trend: capitalism, cosmetics and mirroring the spectacle. journal of communication, culture, and technology, 5, 1-19. retrieved from http://gnovisjournal.org/files/kathy-bayer-anti-aging-trend.pdf beattie, m. (2000). gratitude: affirming the good things in life. los angeles, ca: jacket flap books. benson, p.j. (1987). the relationship between self-concept and a summer camping program for children and adolescents who have cancer. journal of pediatric oncology nursing, 4(1-2), 42-43. doi:10.1177/104345428700400116 berger, k.s. (2008). the developing person: through the life span (7th ed.). new york, ny: worth publishers. binding, l.l., & tapp, d.m. (2008). human understanding in dialogue: gadamer’s recovery of the genuine. nursing philosophy, 9, 121-130. doi:10.1111/j.1466-769x.2007.00338.x laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 13 bluebond-langner, m., perkel, d., goertzel, t., nelson, k., & mcgeary, j. (1990). children’s knowledge of cancer and its treatment: impact of an oncology camp experience. the journal of pediatrics, 116(2), 207-213. doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82876-8 bosticco, c., & thompson, t.l. (2005). narratives and storytelling in coping with grief and bereavement. omega journal of death and dying, 51(1), 1-16. retrieved from http://baywood.com/journals /previewjournals.asp?id=0030-2228 bowles, n. (1995). storytelling: a search for meaning within nursing practice. nurse education today, 15(5), 365-369. doi:10.1016/s0260-6917 canadian association of pediatric oncology camps. (2012). about capoc. retrieved from http://www.cancer camps.ca/?q=node/34 carlick, a., & biley, f.c. (2004). thoughts on the therapeutic use of narrative in the promotion of coping in cancer care. european journal of cancer care, 13(4), 308-317. doi:10.1111 /j.1365-2354.2004.00466.x carpenter, p.j., sahler, o.j.z., & davis, m.s. (1990). use of a camp setting to provide medical information to siblings of pediatric cancer patients. journal of cancer education, 5(1), 21-26. doi:10.1080/08858199009528030 churchill, l.r., & churchill, s.w. (1982). storytelling in medical arenas: the art of selfdetermination. literature and medicine, 1, 73-79. doi:10.1353/lm.2011.0231 cohen l. (1992) anthem. on the future [cd]. columbia, ny. columbia records. connelly, f.m., & clandinin, d.j. (1990). stories of experience and narrative enquiry. educational researcher, 19(5), 2-14. retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/117600 crotty, m. (1998). the foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. london, ca: sage. dean, r.g. (1995). stories of aids: the use of narrative as an approach to understanding in an aids support group. clinical social work journal, 23(3), 287-304. doi:10.1007/ bf02191752 east, l., jackson, d., o’brien, l., & peters, k. (2010). storytelling: an approach that can help to develop resilience. nurse researcher, 17(3), 17-25. retrieved from http://nurseresearcher. rcnpublishing.co.uk france, c.m., & uhlin, b.d. (2006). narrative as an outcome domain in psychosis. psychology and psychotherapy: theory, research and practice, 29(1), 53-67. doi: 10.1348/1476083 05x41001 frank, a.w. (1995). the wounded storyteller: body, illness, and ethics. chicago, il: the university of chicago press. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 14 frank, a.w. (2000). the standpoint of storyteller. qualitative health research, 10(3), 354-365. doi:10.1177/104973200129118499 gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed., j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum (original work published 1960). grondin, j. (2003). the philosophy of gadamer (k. plant, trans.). montreal, qc, canada: mcgill-queens university press (original work published 1999). hattie, j., marsh, h., neill, j., & richards, g. (1997). adventure education and outward bound: out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference. review of educational research, 67(1), 43-87. retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 1170619 jackson, d., & mannix, j. (2003). mothering and women’s health: i love being a mother but... there is always something new to worry about. australian journal of advanced nursing, 20(3), 30-37. retrieved from http://www.ajan.com.au jardine, d.w. (2012). “the memories of childhood have no order and no end”: pedagogical reflections on the occasion of the release, on october 9, 2009, of the remastered version of the beatles’ sergeant pepper’s lonely hearts club band©. journal of applied hermeneutics. article 1. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/ 10515/sy5cv4c40 jardine, d.w., & clandinin, d.j. (1987). does it rain on vancouver island? teaching as storytelling. curriculum inquiry, 17(4), 471-481. retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/action/showpublication?journalcode=currinqu johnson, r. (2009). reclaiming your real self: a psychological and spiritual integration. charleston, sc: book surge. kessell, m., resnick, m.d., & blum, r.w.m. (1985). adventure, etc. – a health promotion program for chronically ill and disabled youth. journal of adolescent health care, 6, 433-438. doi:10.1016/s0197-0070(85)80048-6 kids cancer care foundation of alberta. (2012). retrieved from http://www.kidscancercare. ab.ca/kccf/camp_and_community.htm king, t. (2003). the truth about stories: a native narrative. toronto, on, canada: house of anansi press. kitzinger, c. (2004). feminist approaches. in c. seale, g. gobo, j.f. gubrium, & d. silverman (eds.), qualitative research practice (pp. 125-140). london, uk: sage. koch, t. (1996). implementation of a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing: philosophy, rigor, and representation. phenomenological research, 24(1), 174-184. doi:10.1046/ j.13652648.1996.17224.x laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 15 koch, t. (1998). storytelling: is it really research? journal of advanced nursing, 28(6), 11821190. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00853.x laing, c.m. (2012). in play, at play. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 6. http://jah.synergiesprairies.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/16/pdf laing, c.m. & moules, n.j. (2013). the island of misfit toys. journal of applied hermeneutics, august 5, 2013, article 8. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5js9hq4 laing, c.m. & moules, n.j. (in press). children’s cancer camps: a sense of community, a sense of family. journal of family nursing. leseho, j., & block, l. (2005). ‘listen and i tell you something’: storytelling and social action in the healing of the oppressed. british journal of guidance and counseling, 33(2), 175-184. doi:10.1080/03069880500132706 mishna, f., michalski, j., & cummings, r. (2002). camps as social work interventions: returning to our roots. social work with groups, 24(3/4), 153-171. doi: 10.1300/j009v24n03_11 mooney, b., & holt, d. (1996). the storyteller’s guide. little rock, ar: august house. moules, n.j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes – an ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods 1(3), article 1. retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/ ~ijqm/ moules, n.j., laing, c.m., mccaffrey, g., tapp, d.m., & strother, d. (2012). grandparents’ experiences of childhood cancer. part one: doubled and silenced. journal of pediatric oncology nursing, 29(3), 119-132. doi: 10.1177/1043454212439626 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., morck, a.c., & jardine, d.w. (2011). editorial: on applied hermeneutics and the work of the world. journal of applied hermeneutics, 1, editorial 1. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5d795p4 murray, j.s. (2001). self-concept of siblings of children with cancer. issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing, 24, 85-94. doi:10.1080/01460860116709 okri, b. (1997). a way of being free. london, uk: phoenix house. packman, w., mazaheri, m., sporri, l., long, j.k., chesterman, b, fine, j., & amylon, m.d. (2008). projective drawings as measures of psychosocial functioning in siblings of pediatric cancer patients from the camp okizu study. journal of pediatric oncology nursing, 25(1), 44-55. doi:10.1177/1043454207311915 ricoeur, p. (1981). hermeneutics and the human sciences: essays on language, action, and interpretation (j. b. thompson, trans.). new york, ny: cambridge university press. laing & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 3 16 riley, t., & hawe, p. (2005). researching practice: the methodological case for narrative inquiry. health education research, 20(2), 226-236. doi:10.1093/ her/cyg122 rinpoche, s. (1993). the tibetan book of living and dying (rev. ed.). new york, ny: harper collins. rubin, h.j., & rubin, i.s. (2005). qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data (2nd ed.). thousand oaks, ca: sage. sandelowski, m. (1993). rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. advances in nursing science, 16(2), 1-8. retrieved from http://journals.lww. com/advancesinnursingscience/pages/default.aspx walker, d.a., & pearman, d. (2009). therapeutic recreation camps: an effective intervention for children and young people with chronic illness? archives of disease in childhood, 94(5), 395-402. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.145631 welch, m.j., carlson, a.m., larson, d., & fena, p. (2007). clinical profile, health-related quality of life, and asthma control in children attending us asthma camps. annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology, 99(6), 496-501. doi:org.ezproxy.lib. ucalgary.ca/10.1016/s10811206(10)60377-8 wellisch, d.k., crater, b., wiley, f.m., belin, t.r., & weinstein, k. (2006). psychosocial impacts of a camping experience for children with cancer and their siblings. psycho-oncology, 15, 56-65. doi:10.1002/pon.922 widdershoven, g. (1993). the story of life: hermeneutic perspectives on the relationship between narrative and life history. in a. lieblich & r. josselson (eds.), the narrative study of lives (pp. 1–20). thousand oaks, ca: sage. wiltshire, j. (1995). telling a story, writing a narrative: terminology in health care. nursing inquiry, 2(2), 75-82. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.1995.tb00145.x yeats, w.b. (1928). among the school children. retrieved from http://www.poemhunter. com/poem/among-school-children/ microsoft word gran corrected proof.docx 1 author address corresponding author: thorvald gran email: thorvald.gran@uib.no journal of applied hermeneutics may 12, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 the process of speech-acting specifies methods for grasping meaning. ten operations. a contribution to hermeneutics1 thorvald gran abstract how does speech-acting theory explain the generation of meaning and meaningful collective action? what place does first person subjective experience have in the theory? what are some of the methodological implications of the theory? the purpose here is to outline the searlean theory of meaning formation and to draw some directions for research into meaning formation and organization from that outline. searle assumes a deep intentionality, a directedness towards the world of all the human capacities. searle asks: how do humans from external inputs from the world and through language produce knowledge of the world and organized projects that implemented change the world? reasoning implies meaning. reasons to act identify conditions of success = a meaningful act. research directions (10) are drawn from elements of the speech act theory: the locutionary process, status assignments and meanings, willfulness, types of speech acts, decision-making, and organization. keywords hermeneutics, speech acts, meaning formation, organization theory normativity and facts finding, interpreting, and understanding the meaning people attach to what they say, what they see and do is a major task in social science. those exercises can be termed hermeneutics. the task here is to investigate how speech-acting theory specifies those exercises. it is a first level gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 2 investigation, in the sense that it searches for the hermeneutic methods from a specification of main elements/concepts and relations between them in the searlean theory of speech-acting. a second level investigation would/should go deeper into the methods of interpretation deemed necessary by each of the elements of the theory. how we generate meanings and meaningful action is contested. one view is that we will never really know because meanings are everywhere, that every investigation has to start from existing meanings among humans and can never really get outside of them. moules, field, mccaffrey, and laing (2014) (quoting from david abram) used the example of a physical object, a bowl. we have to look at it from an angle, from a perspective. we can never sense it fully, see it as a whole. fleming, gaidys, and robb (2003) wrote of gadamer in the same terms: we are in history with values and interests, therefore objectivity is impossible: “according to gadamer (1993), we are all part of history and it is thus not possible to step outside history to look at the past objectively” (fleming et al., 2003, p.115). history is subordinated in our horizons, our perspectives. even our consciousness is in history, therefore our pre-understandings are the structure of what we see and understand. therefore, the method of investigation cannot get beyond co-production of interpretations between researcher and persons investigated = the method of conversation, turning things around together, looking at things from different perspectives. gadamer suggested that all understanding is dependent upon pre-understandings. there is a narrow relation between questions and understanding. however, reflecting on our pre-understanding makes a transcendence of them possible (fleming et al., 2003). searle (1995) agreed that pre-understandings are important – he called them first principles. he agreed that we are set in history and that meanings are all over where humans are. he posited that investigations imply perspectives, chosen angles. investigations imply normativity: what interests me; which questions do i want to address? however, he suggested that nature, including humans as biological creatures, functions without perspectives. normativity is not part of the physical-biological processes. they run their basic course independent of human subjectivity. we can, however, describe and even understand those facts and see their relations. contrary to brute facts of nature, social facts and institutions are constituted on perspectives, on our normativity and willfulness. moules et al. and fleming et al. cited above do not make that distinction. searle suggested that this difference between basic, brute facts and social institutional facts opens for investigations of the brute-social relations and for objective knowledge of how humans normatively generate meanings. dichotomies can be approached differently: for example (1) which side is true? moules et al. and fleming et al. seem to suggest that that perspectives influence seeing. therefore, all knowledge contains subjectively chosen perspectives and thus objective knowledge is, in this sense, excluded. judith butler (2003) assumed that acting is dramatizing conventions and that the idea of freely choosing how to act is an illusion, itself a dramatizing of a convention. we enact conventions. personal freedom is an illusion. charles taylor (1985) struggled with the dichotomy of language as either designation (signaling objects) or expression (articulating stories). he favored expressionism but cannot fully exclude designations. but dichotomies can (2) be approached in their relations. searle was mainly on that track. what is the relation between the subjectivity of gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 3 the mind and the objective world of physics and biology? what is the relation between the production of knowledge and the willful production of projects into the future -or the relation between cognition and volition? what is the relation between unregulated decision-making and institutional power? searle asked how, under which conditions, does human intentionality and language generate word/sentence meanings, agreements and social institutional facts. some of those conditions may be hidden, not experienced, even though they are at work. perspectives and interests are present when seeking knowledge, but perspectives and normativity are not part of, are not present in, the basic physical and biological processes. there is, in other words, a complex natural world without normativity. the human body is part of that world with consciousness, language, and the connected experience of time and freedom of choice. the task is to investigate interactions – how, for example, language produces insight into time, how sensing through processing of sense data can generate knowledge, or how ideas condition the biology of the brain. thus, we can discern two approaches to meaning, to hermeneutics: 1) normative positions or perspectives are inherent in all knowledge; objective knowledge is a false, science legitimating norm and 2) by investigating the relations between basic natural and constructed social facts, from different perspectives, and the conditions for the successful implementation of human intentions, objective knowledge of the meaning people/attach to their actions is possible. the task then is to try – at this first level to specify the searlean speech-act theory and to extract some ideas of how to go about investigating meaning formation and meaningful action. the intention is to take strong findings in the searlean philosophy of speech-acting and society and draw methods for research on meanings and action/organization from those findings. speech-acting, the locutionary process through intentionality to organization the construction of collective intentions through speech-acting is a wide and rich field of investigations (tollefsen, 2002). those investigations raise the question how speech-acting through assigned meaning organizes or constructs organization among people, or how speech-acting constructs social institutional facts (searle, 1995, 2001: tuomela 2013). how does human biology and use of language make collective intentions possible? humans are intentional creatures. through all their senses and capacities they/we are actively engaged in the world. humans can speak from practice and using abstract concepts, giving us time, otherand self-reflection and the possibility of making promises. intentions, contextually developed, drive speaking. words, or physical sound blasts are assigned meanings. the sounds we make are assigned status (searle, 1995). so things in the world can be named and investigated not only practically but systematically and logically. projects into the future – the expression of willfulness – can, through agreements, be constructed and described. we can make promises to each other to engage in projects. in this way speech-acting – sometimes generates a new organization, a new, functional, operative group. the basic element in speech-acting is the locution, a particular way of using words: a word or phrase. the locutionary process has two sides: the illocution the intention of the speaker and the chosen means, and the perlocution how the statement put forward is understood by the recipient of it and responded to. practical knowledge does not require a language. a creature just gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 4 knows, through sensed physical experience what to do in different settings from desires and fears. humans can work without having concepts on what they are doing. when the ability to use abstract concepts about things we experience and think – or language comes around, the ability to investigate reaches new levels and the ability to dream up and formulate – more or less realistic – projects into the future expands human creativity. speaking is acting, either in the sense of coming up with new insights, new knowledge, or in generating collective intentions and organization through agreements and promises or in creating disagreements, separations, and conflicts2. normativity is present where people are alive and acting. interests drive investigations. findings and factual statements are put forward for reasons. they describe things that for some are unknown. the findings can themselves be reasons for acting. when i say it is raining outside, when it actually is raining (intention 1), i might make the factual statement because i think you should bring your umbrella or put on a rain-coat (intention 2). by making the statement, it enlightens (intention 1) and organizes (intention 2). we go out with umbrellas. or, an example at a higher level of organization: if i am your boss, i call you into the office and say: “you are fired,” two things happen: (1) the statement changes the world, organizes, creates a new objective fact: from being an employee you are forcefully moved into the status of unemployed; and (2) it enlightens, it describes – in that moment – a new existing world. the rain statement is factual and it carries or is connected to a normative interest: bring umbrellas. the firing statement is different. it organizes directly, it creates a new fact, and it describes that fact at the same time3. a condition is that the person making the declaration has the authority and power to make it. therefore, declarations are how power is used. or declarations put power to work. so, the first suggested speech-act driven methodological operation in investigating meaning is: (m1) look at meaning as a form of intentionality; find the status people assign to words, sentence content, to persons, things and to action, how, under which conditions a deliberation leads to agreements, a common, a shared meaning. speaking is using concepts semantically and syntactically in a language. words and sentences are assigned meaning to sound blasts. sound h-o-u-s-e: meaning “building where people live” – in english. such conceptual meanings and the proliferation of languages have deep, long histories. searle has suggested that languages, because of their role in organizing societies, are ubiquitous and powerful institutions. languages express the presence of society. the ability to use abstract language is a universal human, biologically based, competence. it is an aspect or capacity of human consciousness. speaking is intentional, in the sense of directedness towards the world. speaking can be seen as a five step circular intentional helix process, meaning that the circles are not closed: (1) the intention to speak; (2) the purpose in speaking; (3) the choice of means, what to say; (4) saying it; and (5) registering the reception – and perhaps activating a similar circular and interactive process with the person spoken to (the locution, the illocution and the perlocution, reiterated). searle suggested that the assignment of meaning to something, driven by intentionality, is assigning a status to it: sound blasts assigned meaning; that a person is a teacher or a ring is a gift are status assignments, or formally as searle (1995) suggested: x counts as y in context c. speaking is an interactive process, between a biologically driven intentionality and a conscious process of choosing what to say, in deliberation, in a setting of multiple institutions. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 5 (m2) ask/investigate how words/sentences are assigned status on both the illocutionary and perlocutionary sides. ask how deliberation affects the status assignments, bringing them together or creating status disagreements and conflicts. intentionality living creatures are thoroughly intentional, all their living aspects, all their senses, being directed at or into the world. intentionality is directedness. any state of a conscious body directed at something beyond itself is an intentional state. such a state has a content set in a psychological mode. a status assignment to sound-blasts, or the meaning of words and sentences, is a form of intentionality. propositional intentional states indicate or contain what will make them successful. they have what searle called conditions of satisfaction (cos). propositions (p) also indicate their relation to the world, whether they primarily are meant to describe the world or to change it. that relation searle called directions of fit (df). examples: p1: it is raining. the cos is that it actually is raining. the df is from the world to the proposition: given it is raining, the problem is to make a proposition that conveys that fact to those being spoken to. this df can be written from w à p.4 p2: we would like to see the labor party win the elections: df from words/the project to the world, to changing the world, or df: from p à w. meaning: a form of intentionality meanings, as status assignments, are produced through history and through deliberation, agreements, and institutions, and through the interplay of knowledge and projects – knowledge and politics and between brute natural and social institutional facts. some intentional states are generated from the ground up, without any external observer engaged in the process. the personal feeling of hunger is an example. searle called it an observer independent state of affairs or status assignment. what i mean when i say i am hungry is different. that meaning is observer dependent: dependent exactly on what i mean with the sentence i am hungry – for example, i would appreciate some food. some statements on intentional states are just metaphorical. as an example, the plant in the window is thirsty. searle (2001) noted that effective intentionality is dependent upon human capacities that allow for realization of the intention. voting by raising your hand depends on you having the biological and physical capacity of raising your hand. so it is across the board. searle called all these capacities for the background of intentionality. intentionality as living directedness is itself part of the background. it is an observer independent capacity. when a house (in english) is a building to live in, the meaning of house is intentionally developed over time in the language; we want house to mean a building to live in. when we consider saying: that is the house of the proust family, we evaluate the cos (1): example: are the people i am speaking to attentive to that statement now? if yes, i can/should make the statement. the cos (2) then is: do the people i am speaking to know the proust family? in other words, is the statement meaningful to them? the meaning of the statement is thus built through two cos evaluations. first (1) should i make the statement and then (2) related to the reception of the statement -or cos2 on cos1. meanings are not static. they are produced. some have a long and quite agreed upon history; others are generated here and now. abstract language and the observer independent capacity of intentionality are the basic conditions, on, and from, which meaning is built through speechgran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 6 acting. meanings are found through the applied cos, or the double cos: (1) the cos for making a statement and (2) the cos of made statement. (m3) investigate meaning through the cos people assign to their statements. investigate meaning through the direction of fit between world and mind. identify where the activity is, in formulating sentences about found world (knowledge), in formulating projects (directed at changing the world) or actually changing the world (organizing/reorganizing). direction of causation searle added a third concept: the direction of causation or dc. the distinction between fit and causation serves the analysis of the relation between brute facts and social/institutional facts, between the natural physical and the social institutional. intentional causation of action is a type of causation; it is a mental causation. it is defined as any causal relation between an intentional state and its cos: examples might be: a) a desire – thirst causes me to drink water. in that case, the intentional state causes its cos, the actual drinking; or b) the possibility of drinking water causes my desire to drink water. in this case, the dc is opposite: cos causes the intentional state. if we look at a desire as a subjective project, then the df is from the project (given) to (changing, adjusting) the world or df: from p à w. if we look at the desire as a fact, as a first person mental state, the desire causes the drinking. the desire is the world, the reality. it causes drinking as a subjective action. dc is from the world – the desire a fact w to action a, or from w à a. the cause is there, but it is often not seen. i feel thirst. i drink. i do not experience what is causing the feeling, the desire. there are things/processes in my body beyond my conscious experience causing the thirst. that makes the search and the drinking of water possible and in a way, necessary. for an intention, a project, to be satisfied it has to have a from p à w df – the p, the desire is there, given you have to find the water. the dc of the same project is in the opposite direction, from w à to action a. the thirst causes the action, the drinking. assigning or using meaning is thus a form of intentionality. meaning serves a purpose. (m4) investigate the cause of intentional states. they are often a necessary condition for the state of mind. they are often not consciously experienced. they are at work in physical and biological micro-processes. intentions when speaking together, deliberating, there might emerge an agreement to act together. the agreement can be termed a prior intention to the actual bodily action or cooperation, while the action, once started, is dependent upon often several adjusted, intentions-in-action. meanings seen as a form intentionality in projects, in willful, future-directed actions, can be seen as a chain of three causes: (1) from deliberations to agreements or prior intentions; (2) from prior intentions to intentions-in-action and (3) from there to bodily movements or – in general: action = intentions-in-action + bodily movements (searle, 2001, p.49). gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 7 actions are willful. you have to dare to act. for that reason there is a tsg from thinking about acting to actually acting, going into the bodily movements or the cooperation. in that gap, you reflect on what to do and you develop a reason for acting a special way and you convince yourself – and others perhaps – that it is a good reason. you can act by means of something or by way of something: turn off the light by flipping the switch (acting by means); vote yes by raising your hand (voting by way of). searle called the first action causal and the voting action constitutive. raising your hand or not constitutes voting (searle, 2001, p.52).statements can thus have regulative or constitutive meanings. (m5) separate prior intentions from intentions in action and see that there often is a rulefree tsg. separate regulative from constitutive statements. the latter, when effective, create social institutional facts. willfulness and rationality imply time-space gaps agreements generate obligations. obligations give reasons for acting. as an example (searle, 2001): wanting a glass of beer is seldom a product of an obligation. wanting a beer is most often a desire. so asking for a beer at a bar is most often a product of a desire. however, you are obliged to pay. that obligation is a desire-independent reason for paying. our membership in institutions – as rule systems generates generally desire-independent reasons for acting. institutions vary on how close their rules are to our desires. if you have a shop making a good profit, that institution is close to your desire for money. the policeman who puts you in jail for taxevasion – is a member of an institution in that situation very far from your desires. the jail pushes more and stronger desire independent reasons for acting on you than did the bill in the “bierstube.” most people are located in a set of institutions. their rules and demands vary and are often hard to compare. think of rules and demands made in families, firms, schools, the military, street gangs, cocktail parties, and doctoral promotions. however, acting demands a choice of which obligations, which institutions to honor in a specific situation. so how do we find out what to do? we make evaluations, develop and compare reasons for different possible and impossible actions. we compare the strength and weaknesses of the reasons. because the institutions cannot be uniformly compared we are, at least for some moments in a situation of genuine freedom. our choice in that time-space gap tsg is not a logical or computational deduction. a chosen reason is then an unregulated leap from open alternatives into the world in the form of a decision or an action. a decision-making rule for example family always first would eliminate the freedom, close the tsg. decision-making on what to do next, in the future has a project to world or word to world df. given the project, we try to adjust or change the world accordingly. knowledge and desires influence the evaluations, but choosing which institution, which obligations to honor, is in principle a desire-independent reason for acting. searle suggested that this capacity for acting on reasons is human rationality (searle, 2001). rationality unfolds in the tsgs between decisions and/or interventions/actions into the world. it is in the rule-free moments of evaluation of different institutional obligations that our freedom of will is active (searle, 2004). that whole process is language dependent, making it possible to reflect in time on what to do in the situation we are in. we have bodily desires that do not demand reasons to be acted on. therefore we do notneed to engage heavily in the meaning of desires. meanings are crucial in language and in the agreements that emerge from speech-acting. relations are constituted on meanings. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 8 (m6) if human rationality is seen as the capacity for reasoned action, and if we see that acting on desires actually does not require reasons, then rationality unfolds in rule-free tsgs evaluating varying desire independent reasons to act in relations to others. we can specify the unfolding of rationality in gaps in a decision-making model: figure 2: a speech-act based model of decision-making. reasoning takes time time gap a gap b gap c intention 1: intention 2: intention 3: intention 4: to make its contents how impl implement decision ement? learning the contribution of this model to research on meanings is especially the concept of the tsg. decision-making takes time and has a period of prior reflection. in that period, the person moves /searches in for a moving but structured space of knowledge, interests, and institutions/rules. her institutions, whether freely chosen or pushed effectively onto her, carry or demand obligations (see for e.g., butler, 2003). but there is a new space – a gap in that time flow without rules, making a free and open reflection on the situation and potential tasks and decisions possible. the gap is such that finally making a decision is a leap into the world, a leap that is beyond deductions. we might say with charles taylor (1985) that the leap, the decision, is a product of a holistic evaluation. it is an expression, an articulation beyond designations. a good example of such speech-acting based decision-making emerges in lie (1985). he investigated the political process in norway between 1945 and 1950 when a struggle about norway’s position in the international contest between the soviet union and the usa unfolded. when lie (1985) is a good example it is because he makes use of detailed reports from the internal meetings of the social democratic labor party on norway’s international position. he demonstrated how a deep interest in socialism and a trust in the soviet union, strengthened by its major contribution to the struggle against nazi germany is confronted in the internal party meetings by new descriptions of soviet oppression of peoples in bordering countries. soviet allied communist parties in western european countries, including in norway, seemed to support the oppression. some labor party members chose exit and joined the soviet communists in norway. others wavered and withdrew into passivity, while still others gradually changed their opinion, and joined into the discourse on how western europe should respond to threatening soviet activity. lie compared the soviet international strategy to the emerging ideas of un solidarity, the establishment of the western union (benelux, germany, france, and italy 1951), the marshall gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 9 aid to europe and the idea of a nato alliance. gradually, through continued meetings in the party and in international meetings of socialist parties, the idea of a western alliance against soviet postwar oppression was consolidated. lie demonstrated the crucial role of the formal and informal meetings where knowledge is gradually forged about the real international and internal practice of the soviet union. gradually norway’s international position – either neutrality or siding with the western democracies is clarified and the western alliance gains support. micro materials from the meetings of the labor party continuously seen in their institutional and popular context in norway and elsewhere, give a deep understanding of the decision-making process, both in the party and, the next time around, in the open parliamentary decision-making. (m7) to understand social and political development, investigate reflections and speechacting in the tsgs between decisions and actions or interventions into the world through (powerful) meetings where people think, investigate and deliberate on politics and the means necessary for alternative routes of action. collective intentions generate groups and common meanings deliberations can lead to agreements. through agreements, people with varying and uncoordinated intentions come together in or under more or less well and commonly defined collective intentions. this might be seen as the trait of all sociality, of all social facts: common, shared intentions among two or more people, formed through speech-acting and dialogue in specific settings. for humans, the social takes on institutional form. institutions may be defined as rules or conceptually defined collective intentions. agreements create cohesion and give groups meaning. examples could be: institutions as rule: driving on the right hand side of the road; a functional institution or organization: a trading firm with the intention of buying and selling food in markets with a profit. without the abstract concepts – like rules, roads and trading firms there would be no common presence of such regulated driving or such trading firms. traffic would perhaps be dominated by the most powerful and trade would occur haphazardly. speechacting with the use of abstract concepts generates recognized collective intentions. speech-acting in this sense organizes, or through repeated similar agreements, creates institutions. speechacting might even be seen as the motor of organizing, or at least as the key technology bringing persons in context sensitive modes into groups either regulating or engaging in new practical activity. (m8) search for and investigate agreements as collective intentions, more or less clearly and commonly expressed. in the case of organizations: see them as prior intentions to action. study implementation through consecutive intentions-in-action. when you are investigating social relations, think beyond the subjective into the materiality of them. when speaking we put forward propositions (p) in a psychological mode (m), for example a friendly or an aggressive mode. the proposition (p) is thus an m function of p: m(p). we can identify modes of speech-acting at the group level: a routine mode, an operative mode, a learning mode, a planning mode, etc. in organization and innovation studies, we can investigate how such modes are set, managed, and changed. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 10 in general, organizations, through different media, carry meanings and socialize (prospective) members into them. but speech-act theory suggests that organizations are no more or less than the projects people assign to them. it is agreements and status assignments that hold organizations together. power and sanctions can bolster them – for a while. knowledge and projects the distinction between knowledge and projects suggests that the two activities are qualitatively different; knowledge production is about the ability to use your senses, to investigate, to do research, to find indications of how that part of the world that interests you is structured, organized or how happenings function – how an organization for example affects the behavior of its members, how a certain amount of rain and air temperature affects movements in the protruding sections of the mountain man in western norway at present (30.10.2014) evaluated as a huge potential rock-slide into the nearby fjord. the knowledge project is closing in on the truth of things of interest – both agreements and mountain movements and keeping subjective interests and emotions of the researchers as far as possible from affecting the measurements and descriptions. the norm is truthfulness. project production, on the other hand, is different. projects often have a starting point or a background in knowledge of things and in desires – like for example the experience of a disaster – but projects, because their core meaning is to change the world, are normative. projects are willful. a project is a choice among alternative routes of action. projects thus have a subjective ontology. before they are realized they only exist in minds and agreements. somebody wants to build a new house or a political party wants to increase its votes in upcoming elections. the project norm is not truthfulness. project norms are engagement, mobilization, willfulness, realism and morals. project implementation is dependent upon operative competence, ability to organize. project competence and knowledge competence are thus interacting but different types of speech-acting. however, project competence is dependent on knowledge and knowledge is dependent on ability to organize relevant and realistic research projects. the meaning of a project is its relation to your interests and values. the meaning of piece of knowledge is its relevance to your projects. in human consciousness, the two processes unfold continuously, the senses engaged in finding where we are at every moment (knowledge) and our fantasy and willfulness engaged continuously in what to do next (projects). the social world is constituted on our perspectives, our norms, values and willfulness. the physical and biological world is not. its ontology is objective in the sense of not being constituted in any way by human subjectivity. some social facts are first person subjective, and in that sense beyond objective knowledge. agreements on the other hand are epistemologically open for objective descriptions. producing knowledge of any kind is no simple matter. in that process perspectives, fantasy, ability to articulate hypotheses, controlled use of methods, knowledge of relevant sources etc. is of importance. meaning is continually produced in the ubiquitous interplay between knowledge and projects, between “where i am” and “where to go next.” gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 11 (m9) separate knowledge production from project production and realization, and study how the two competences are related and interdependent. both brute and social facts are open for objective descriptions. five speech acts with different meanings searle has suggested that there are five types of speech acts (searle, 1979). they affect the production of meaning differently. assertives are typically about the world, both the social and the physical world. they are subservient to truth conditions, that the things asserted actually exist, that they can be registered and described in a meaningful way from the registrations. the df of assertives is from the world to words. directives stimulate and direct actions, a type of wielding power. their meaning is dependent upon their specificity. they are evaluated normatively. the df of directives is from words to world. the condition of their success is that people do what is directed, in effect that the words change the world. the third type is commissives, making promises and commitments. commissives create obligations. they suggest that a certain action will occur in the future. commissives are important for trust. their meaning is dependent upon type of action implied in the obligation. their value is dependent upon their importance in a life situation. the df is like for directives, from words to world, but in a different sense. while directives try to direct the action of the other, commissives that are sincere bind the future action of the person making the commitment. the cos is that the promising person does that which was promised. the fourth type is expressives. they give voice to an emotion. expressives can strengthen or weaken the feeling of community in a group. the meaning of expressives is exactly that function. expressives have no df. they emanate as such from a person to others. the fifth type is of special importance (searle, 2010). declarations have, as mentioned, a double function simultaneously. they change the world and describe it at the same time. their prime cos is that what is declared actually happens. “you are fired” is such a declaration, with cos that the employee accepts. but a secondary cos is that the person making the declaration has the authority to make such declarations. if the employee accepts, that authority (however limited) is in place. if not, the reason can be that the authority is not there or that the power supporting the continued employment of the person overrules the declaration. here, searle was close to judith butler’s thesis that acting is realizing/dramatizing conventions. the power of the firing agent is deeply dependent upon acceptance in society of that power. however, the speech-acting gaps of unregulated reflection suggest that no matter how strong the convention there is a room, a space for freedom to act in deviation from or in contradiction to the convention. the speech act theory thus solves – in embryo a problem butler’s strong conventionalism leaves unsolved: the creation of new institutions and new conventions. how agreements organize through disseminations new agreements occur in often densely institutionalized settings. it is, as butler underscored, interesting how values and power in that setting influence decision-making and personal thoughts and actions. it is also interesting how new agreements spread into the setting or meet gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 12 boundaries there. agreements themselves create boundaries. often they imply – in embryo – hierarchy, an unequal distribution of power between the members of the agreement. knut dahl jacobsen (1964) specified a set of concepts for analyzing how decision-making organizes, within the decision-making group and beyond it. he did not, at the time of writing, have access to the micro theory of speech-acting, but in hindsight we might call his understanding of decision-making as collective speech-acting or group speech-acting. in his study of how the organization of public administration of agriculture changed in norway in the 19th century, he suggested a scheme for the study of how decisions and agreements affect and construct group and extra-group activities. agreements organize directly and through disseminations. table 1: decisions have in-group and extra-group effects within-group: look for the distribution of: commitments, responsibilities, initiatives and information extra-group: look for spread or contraction of: legitimacy, decision acceptance, decision outreach and power source: knut dahl jacobsen 1964 iand we-modes speech-acting and agreements create social facts. the agreements often express a psychological movement of persons or groups from an i-mode to a we-mode of participation. agreements change relations, change our self-understanding. they connect us to others, they can construct an i-mode of participation in a group activity, as an example: i will do my part of painting the house. at a higher level, agreements can generate a we-mode of participation; for example: asked: “what are you doing?” answer: “we are painting the house” (tuomela, 2013). in both cases the house might well be painted, but the we-mode-understanding will imply a different responsibility for the overall task. a second example: “i am an employee of firm a and will do my part of the job for a wage” – an i-mode of participation. or; “our unit/organization is a cooperative; we are all members of the unit engaged in organizing, sustaining and doing the work.” agreements impact groups internally and affect their status externally. agreements most often also exclude, creating borders to the environment. agreements can imply hierarchy and oppression, however without the oppression very often being accepted by the oppressed5. (m10) agreements create new social facts, new institutions – not necessarily different from existing institutions and usually empower members to the agreement. but often agreements generate hierarchy and exclude values, interests and actual and potential participants. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 13 multi-institutional contexts agreements can increase internal differentiation and hierarchic power. we can from these insights see an emergent more complex model of generative speech-acting, a model of how speech-acting generates organization (gran, 2014). speech-acting is intentional, is directed at someone, it functions through status assignments and flows through illocutions and perlocutions back and forth, some speech-acting resulting in agreements. speech-acting at the person to person level (micro) and at the collective level, as decision-making in groups (macro) takes place in institutionalized contexts. the subjectively honored institutions deliver commitments and responsibilities. speech-acting is the unfolding of rationality in the sense of searching for and generating desire-independent reasons for acting. because the setting is multi-institutional there is an element of freedom in time between interventions, generating responsibility, where the person is in search of the best reason for acting in a certain way, honoring one or a selected set of obligations. that freedom unfolds in a certain, more or less limited, tsg that is not ruleregulated. a rule would eliminate the freedom, would collapse rationality as the search for an acceptably reasoned action. the nexus of language capacity, speaking together and making agreements, where the agreements assign the conditions of their satisfaction, their realization can be seen as a motor of meaningful action and organization. at present the most general and powerful institutional context of speech-acting can be – and most often is the nation state. that institution is seldom deducted from and negotiated within common general norms, but created by fiat as a sovereign institution in a delimited territory that can be physically defended by the resources controlled by those who effectively initiate and take on state responsibility. in this way speech-acting theory is developed at two levels: micro and macro and at each level in a setting of actors in their institutional/historical context. table 2: levels and contexts of speech-acting acting in context of level 1 speech-acting interpersonal locutions, illocutions, perlocutions established collective intentions, institutions level 2 decision-making in groups/organizations intentions to act, collective decisions and their implementation established institutions and most generally of nation states demanding sovereignty meaning is assigning status to these actors and processes, to decisions and following actions. meaning is calibrated, the calibration is important for the power – and status of the different parts of the activity. meaning can be researched through the cos, the conditions of realization assigned to the decisions. conclusion: how speech-acting generates meaning and organization speech-acting is a theory of how humans generate meanings, the meanings of what they say, do and see/have in their surroundings. speech-acting theory is by implication for research on gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 14 meaning formation, a contribution to hermeneutics. meanings are historically produced. the searlean approach is to seek out the micro-processes that generate meaning – over time. sociology is related to biology. articulation is not separated absolutely from designation. institutionalized power does in no case completely eliminate subjective freedom. we apply perspectives, but they are not in the physical/biological world, making whole descriptions of objects and processes possible. subjectivity does not exclude objectivity. meaning is created through the use of language, where sounds become concepts when a status is assigned to them, and where persons and things gain identity the same way, through status assignments. statuses are products of spoken-about practices over time. persons become teachers, buildings become parliaments and metal is formed into artefacts. the general mechanism x counts as y in context c is at work. meaning can be approached from the context or from the subjectivity of the person: either, what is a common understanding of the role of a teacher, or how does teacher a in place b conceive of the contents of that label? meanings can be sought in the conditions a person or a group considers as success criteria for a planned practice. articulation (of the project) is important, but its meaning emerges more fully in the conditions defining success. speech-acting, through agreements creates or contradicts social facts. agreements are by definition collective intentions, more or less equally defined by the parties to the agreement. collective intentions constitute the social. the social in that sense has a subjective ontology. the social exists as agreements and disappears when agreements are eroded. in this sense, the social is different from basic processes in the physical and biological nature. they have an objective ontology. they are mostly beyond human constitutive influence. the structure of water and of light waves is beyond or below human creativity. however, agreements materialize through iteration and practice and (some) can be objectively described. so the subjective ontology can be combined with an objective epistemology. but meaning as such can hardly be materialized. meaning must be exposed and sought through speech-acting (widely defined as expressing a state of affairs). reiterated agreements create institutions. institutions can in general be seen as rules, agreements on behavior in varying contexts, and rules as institutions when the agreements reach a certain level of commonality and are respected and copied. organizations can be seen as functional institutions, which are as rule systems developed within a group that has a defined – collective – task. institutions are the materials of a society, of a culture. they are constituted, reproduced, and dismantled through the powerful medium of speech-acting. we can be and are pushed and socialized into institutions and we can enter them willingly. no matter how we enter, they generate – or force upon us obligations. in this sense, they are materials of rationality, materials – obligations we reason on when acting. institutions carry meaning. schools define the task of learning, the military the task of killing and defending national territories, the market the possibility of transacting to gain goods we want and give up goods we are willing to offer etc. institutions liberate and exclude. rules are often seen as constraints on acting. but in a deeper sense, rules generate new ways of interacting, making possible the production of artefacts and relations that expand human livelihoods. think of the huge step forward implied in the creation of schools. the idea emerged that instead of continual down to earth learning in practical activity, for example the father teaching the girl how to paddle a dugout boat as they actually used it, we gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 15 might gather youngsters in a community with a teacher or two, who had practical experience, who could do his/her own investigations into a practice and teach it systematically to the youngsters. the school was a new social institutional fact with a huge teaching advantage compared to the unorganized, individualized learning process. in this sense, the school was a social innovation that expanded and deepened the learning processes globally, and in its wake saw the creation of colleges, universities, and research institutes. in this sense the school was hardly a constraint, even if it did require some discipline from the teachers and pupils. so it is with most institutions. however, most institutions also exclude. private schools might say that only pupils who can pay can join, or only pupils from the community of the owners of the school can become pupils. electing a leadership of the school excludes other persons from that leadership. a firm selects some workers among many more candidates. a nation state might well exclude people from entering and national rules might make certain activity illegal, with dire consequences for those who act illegally. the is (at present december 2014) seem to consider killing people who indicate a religious belonging outside the religious and political bounds of is as quite legitimate. the american government in august 1945 considered it legitimate to drop an atomic bomb on hiroshima to end the second world war. functional institutions then may use terrible forms of hierarchic power to implement their values and goals. in this sense, oppression may be an ingredient of upholding institutions, maybe even a constitutive ingredient. nation states are perhaps those present institutions that most obviously have oppressive power, in the form of military and police, as a constitutive element of their mere existence. in this sense, we might say – in the present stage of nation state organization of politics, violence is lurking everywhere. human language use and the abstract concepts in it generate rationality: the ability of transcending stimulus-response and acting on reasons. in this sense, speech-acting is the motor of meaning formation and of institutions, the basic structures of any society (searle, 2010). endnotes 1 drafts presented for the pgi group, dao, university of bergen and at phd course bi, business university, nydalen, oslo, on invitation from professor tore bakken. thanks for listening, for good comments and suggestions. thanks also for valuable comments from two anonymous evaluators. 2 judith butler 1997 investigated hate speech from a speech-act perspective. her question is “what version of the performative is at work” – in hate speech. she contributed importantly to the discussion when does speaking become acting, and when does that acting become illegal. but butler criticized the idea that hate speakers are autonomous. rather they are enmeshed in power structures. she found support for that view in foucault: “grasp subjection in its material instances as a constitution of subjects.” so change of hate speakers implies change of power structures. this view makes butler unattentive to the searlean investigations of how speech-acting is managed by persons in interactions. it is a negative idealization butler says, to view speechacting as “sovereign action.” 3 searle 2010 suggested that such declarations are the most powerful speech-acts. 4 searle described the same relation as adjusting p to w or p à w or df as downward. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 16 5 in my opinion searle had little time for the analysis of borders, hierarchy, and oppression. see gran (2011). references butler, j. (2003). performative acts and gender constitution: an essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. in p. auslander (ed.), performance: critical concepts in literary and cultural studies, volume 4 (97-110). london, uk: routledge. butler, j. (1997). excitable speech. a politics of the performative. london, uk: routledge. fleming, v., gaidys, u., & robb, y. (2003). hermeneutic research in nursing: developing a gadamerian-based research method. nursing inquiry, 10(2), 113-120. gran, t. (2014). organizational analysis. the generative speech act model. paper to the winir conference, london, uk, september 2014. gran, t. (2011). john searle on the concept of political power, the power of states and warmaking: why states demand a monopoly of the organisation and use of soldiers. journal of institutional economics, 8(1), 71-91. jacobsen, k.d. (1963). teknisk hjelp og politisk struktur: en avgjørelsesteoretisk studie av norsk landbruksforvaltning 1874-1899. oslo, norway: universitetsforlaget. lie, h. (1985). skjebneår 1945 – 1950. oslo, norway: tiden norsk forlag. moules, n.j., field, j.c., mccaffrey, g.p., & laing, c.m. (2014). conducting hermeneutic research: the address of the topic. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 7. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5mw28w9 searle, j.r. (1979). expression and meaning. studies in the theory of speech acts. new york, ny: cambridge university press. searle, j.r. (1995). the construction of social reality. new york, ny: the free press. searle, j.r. (2001). rationality in action. cambridge, ma:the mit press. searle, j.r. (2004). freedom and neurobiology: reflections on free will, language, and political power. new york, ny: columbia university press. searle, j.r. (2010). making the social world: the structure of human civilization. new york, ny: oxford university press. gran journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 article 4 17 taylor, c. (1985). human agency and language. philosophical papers 1. new york, ny: cambridge university press. tollefsen, d.p. (2012). collective intentionality and the social sciences. philosophy of the social sciences, 42, 323-355. tuomela, r. (2013). social ontology: collective intentionality and group agents. new york, ny: oxford university press. corresponding author: kari latvanen university of helsinki email: punnittusana@ gmail.com journal of applied hermeneutics july 29, 2016 the author(s) 2016 the symbolism of evil in the big book of aa kari latvanen abstract alcoholics anonymous (aa) describes itself as a “fellowship of men and women who share their experience, strength and hope with each other that they may solve their common problem and help others to recover from alcoholism” (alcoholics anonymous, 2010). the fellowship has millions of members all around the world and the number of independent aa groups is counted in tens of thousands. in this article, i try to understand the recovery from alcoholism in the fellowship of aa as a meaning giving process where the alcoholic is invited to interpret the founding text of aa, a lcoholics anonymous: the story of how more than one hundred men have recovered from alcoholism, and to appropriate the world that it opens in front of him. i focus on interpreting the symbolic language with which the big book of aa speaks of evil. i also explain how this symbolic language is related to recovery – i.e., how the alcoholic may find in the pages of the big book commonly shared symbols of stain, sin, and guilt which express his blind experience of evil. keywords hermeneutics, paul ricoeur, symbolism, evil, alcoholics anonymous, recovery alcoholics anonymous (aa) is best described as both a fellowship of alcoholics and a program of recovery from alcoholism (kurtz, 1979). as a social organization, aa exists in and through local meetings and the interpersonal relationships between members. it charges no dues or fees from members, and keeps no membership lists. the only membership requirement is a desire to stop drinking. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 2 aa’s program for recovery is outlined in the famous twelve steps and it is basically a set of spiritual concepts and practices that have the purpose not of curing alcoholism, but of transforming the alcoholic. aa sees alcoholism as an incurable and progressive disease of the body, mind, and spirit, but the fellowship and program focus mainly on the spiritual aspect. the fellowship's understanding of alcoholism and recovery was first put to words in a coherent manner in a book titled a lcoholics anonymous – the story of how more than one hundred men have recovered from alcoholism (1939). the book is also known as the “big book of aa” and it is the basic text of aa in that it gives an account of the experiences of the original members of the fellowship concerning alcoholism and recovery. in the book, the founders try to interpret their experiences, put them into words, and thus make them understandable for themselves and their readers. the purpose of the book is presented in the first lines of the foreword to its first edition as follows: we, of alcoholics anonymous, are more than one hundred men a nd women who have recovered from a seemingly hopeless state of mind and body. to show other alcoholics precisely how we have recovered is the main purpose of this book. for them, we hope these pages will prove so convincing that no further authentication will be necessary. (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. vii) the big book has been read and used by millions of alcoholics since its publication. it is usually the first piece of literature a newcomer is given. also, the text itself and other texts that focus on interpreting and clarifying the ideas presented in the big book are regularly read in aa meetings. the big book sets a kind of a standard for “good recovery” (mercadante, 1996, p. 12). in this article, i try to support the claim that recovery in aa is, in a very significant way, a hermeneutical process of meaning giving. it starts with the first step of the recovery program where the alcoholic admits to being powerless over alcohol, that is, interprets his or her situation according to the meaning of the step. then, as s/he proceeds in the program, the alcoholic learns to see his or her situation in regard with alcohol, himself or herself, other people and god in a new light. the big book supports this process by inviting the reader to interpret its te xt and to appropriate the world that it opens in front of the reader. the text uses various discursive procedures such as symbols, metaphors, and narration to show the world in a new light. o ne can even say that the text forces its reader to a hermeneutica l process of interpretation, because metaphors and symbols, for example, are such structures of signification that can be understood only in and through interpretation. i will support my claim using the conceptual and interpretive tools provided by paul r icoeur's theory of interpretation (ricoeur, 1976, 1981). ricoeur's theory of interpretation can help us understand recovery in aa for several reasons. firstly, ricoeur's theory helps us understand what interpretation is – and it does this in a way that is fruitful when we try to understand what role the big book plays in recovery. secondly, the theory shows how figurative language is used in order to create new meanings. thirdly, it gives us means for interpreting this figurative language. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 3 i will demonstrate my claim by interpreting the symbolic language with which the big book of aa speaks of evil. o ne part of recovery has to do with dealing with the evil suffered and done by the alcoholic. the question concerning the alcoholic's guilt and responsibility has to be resolved by positing and articulating evil so that s/he can relate to it and its role in the world and in him or her. i will show how the alcoholic learns to see his or her obsession as a symptom of a spiritual malady, of pride, arrogance, and hubris through interpreting the symbolically rich text of the big book. this symbolism of evil gives meaning to the alcoholic's experience of evil. in addition, one can even claim that the symbolism of evil of the big book has a certain liberating power. the big book shows the world in a new light according to paul ricoeur, when discourse is fixed by writing, something important occurs in regard with the reference of the discourse (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 34-37, 94; ricoeur, 1981, p. 215). in spoken discourse, the interlocutors can anchor the discourse to the surrounding reality by for example ostensive indicators and definite descriptions. but the final referent of a text is, in ricoeur's words, “non-ostensive.” in a text, discourse exceeds the mere ostensive designation of the situation common to the interlocutors in the dialogical situation. the text does not point to the concrete world but to a world of its own. the text speaks about a possible world and about different ways to orient within that world. it re fers to different world-propositions and discloses a new way of being. the text constructs a world of its own and in doing so it also shows reality in a new light. ricoeur says that the text represents the world in a way that is not a mere shadow image of reality (pellauer, 2007, p. 69; ricoeur, 1976, pp. 40-41). he speaks of the text's way of representation as ”iconic augmentation” and uses the invention of oil painting by dutch painters as an analogy to describe what he means. o il painting enhances the contrasts, gives colors back their resonance and lets the luminosity within which things shine appear. it gave the painters a new optic alphabet with which they could write a new text of reality. painting for the dutch masters was neither the production nor the reproduction of the world but its metamorphosis. in ricoeur's words, “the inscription of discourse is the transcription of the world, and transcription is not reduplication, but metamorphosis” (ricoeur, 1976, p. 42). the idea of iconic augmentation points to how this metamorphosis is achieved by enhancing certain features of the universe so that the world can be seen in a new light (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 41 -42). iconicity means the revelation of a real more real than ordinary reality. iconicity is the re-writing of the world and writing is a particular case of iconicity. texts metamorphose or re-write the world by using various discursive procedures such as metaphors, symbols, and narration. metaphor, for example, is a deviant usage of predicates in the framework of the sentence as a whole (ricoeur, 1976, p. 50). a metaphorical statement invites us to make an interpretation where we see something as (ricoeur, 2008, pp. 168-169), e.g., alcoholism as an illness. symbols, in turn, are structures of signification in which a literal meaning designates another meaning which is figurative and which can be apprehended only latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 4 through the first (ricoeur, 1974, pp. 12-13; ricoeur, 1976, pp. 53-54). symbols, too, show us something as. in religious language, for example, the word “stain” is sometimes used to describe a situation where someone's relationship with the sacred is in some way “stained” (ricoeur, 1969, p. 15). as said, a text constructs a world of its own. the reader's task is then to open that world. according to ricoeur, the meaning of the discourse fixed by writing has to be actualized in reading (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 91-92). in understanding the text, we “follow its movement from sense to reference: from what it says, to what it talks about” (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 87-88). the final object of interpretation is the world that the text opens in front of itself. what must be interpreted in a text is “a proposed world that i could inhabit and wherein i could project one of my own most possibilities” (ricoeur, 2008, p. 83). we can now state that aa's big book is a text that constructs a world of its own by using various discursive procedures. the big book portrays a unique conception of what alcoholism and recovery are. in order to understand what the big book says and what it talks about when it talks about alcoholism and recovery, we, as readers, have to answer the challenge that the text sets to us. we need to open the world of the big book by trying to “follow the path of thought opened up by the text” and place ourselves “en route towards the orient of the text” (ricoeur, 1981, p. 162). this need for interpretation applies for every reader of the text. in this sense, every reader of the big book takes part in a process of interpreting the text which is similar to t he one that a recovering alcoholic goes through. even if we are not alcoholics we can, after interpreting the text, say: “i understand what it means to be in the world in the manner presented here” (k lemm, 1983, p. 144). but the recovering alcoholic in aa, may go a bit further and aim to appropriate the world of the big book. in appropriation, an imagined possible mode of being is made actual. that is to say, the recovering alcoholic may recognize the world of the text of the big book as his or her own and become what s/he truly is through that recognition (klemm, 1983, p. 144). interpreting the symbolism of evil sin, lack of moral sense, behavior disorder, illness, mental illness – these are some conceptions in which alcoholism has been understood in the course of history (e.g., fingarette, 1989; kurtz, 2008, pp. 91-108; mercadante, 1996; stolberg, 2006; tiebout 1999, pp. 5-12; vaillant 1983, pp. 15-44; white, 1998, 2000). they all include in somewhat unspecified ways the idea that the alcoholic is abnormal, deviant, sick – or even evil. not surprisingly, then, also the alcoholic may experience feelings of shame, worthlessness, guilt, or even fear and dread. a significant part of recovery has to do with the way evil is posited in regard with alcoholism and the alcoholic. is the alcoholic, for example, an innocent victim of a disease or is s/he to be held responsible for the condition? the question concerning the alcoholic's guilt and responsibility has to be resolved by positing and articulating evil so that s/he can relate to it and its role in the world and in him or her. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 5 i will next try to interpret how the big book of aa gives meaning to the problem of evil associated with alcoholism. in the interpretation, i will apply paul ricoeur's analysis of the symbols of evil – stain, sin, and guilt – that are commonly shared in the western world. ricoeur presented his analysis in the book the symbolism of evil (1969). ricoeur argues that evil becomes evil only when the possibility of confessing it arises to human consciousness (ricoeur, 1974, p. 289; simms, 2003, p. 21). evil is always acknowledged and confessed through language. in fact, there is no direct, non-symbolic language of evil undergone, suffered, or committed. whether a man1 admits his responsibility or claims to be the prey of the evil taking hold of him, he does so first and foremost in a symbolism of evil. evil is known through its symbols, because such symbols – e.g., stain, sin, and guilt – provide the material out of which confession is to be constructed. for ricoeur, a symbol is “any structure of signification in which a direct, primary, literal meaning designates, in addition, another meaning which is indirect, secondary and figurative and which can be apprehended only through the first” (ricouer, 1974, pp. 12-13). symbols are, in a sense, two-dimensional; they have a linguistic or semantic side and a non-semantic side. in relation with the linguistic side of the symbol, we can talk about doublemeaning or first order meaning and second order meaning (ricoeur, 1969, p. 15; ricoeur, 1974, pp. 12-13; ricoeur, 1976, pp. 53-54). in addition to the primary, direct or literal meaning, there is a secondary meaning that is hidden and can be understood only through the first meaning. the primary meaning produces the secondary meaning, as the meaning of the meaning. interpretation of a symbol is the work of thought that consist in deciphering the hidden meaning in the apparent meaning, in unfolding the levels of meaning implied by the literal meaning. for example, the word “stain” means primarily “defilement” or “unclean” etc. (ricoeur, 1969, p. 15). but symbolically this literal and manifest sense points beyond itself to something that is like a stain or a spot. the non-semantic side of the symbol has to do with the fact that the linguistic element of the symbol points always to something nonlinguistic (ricoeur, 1974, p. 289; ricoeur, 1976, p. 54). psychoanalysis, for example, connects its symbols to hidden psychic conflicts and the history of religion sees in symbols a milieu of the manifestations of the sacred (ricoeur, 1976, p. 54 ). in religious language, for example, “stain” might point to someone whose situation in regard with the sacred is in some ways defiled or unclean. symbols demand to be interpreted. because they are equivocal, symbols and the structures of signification that are associated with them work only when their structure has been explicated. for any symbolism to work, a minimal hermeneutics is required (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 62-63). 1 in the following sections where i read paul ricoeur's texts and the text of the big book i will use the gender-specific pronoun “man” in order to be faithful to the original texts. aa's big book, for example, refers to alcoholics as “men” even though it acknowledges that women, too, can be alcoholics. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 6 stain according to ricoeur, the language of confession is counterpart of the experience it brings to light (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 7-8). since the experience of evil is complex, the language in which it is expressed is also complex. ricoeur finds in the symbolism of evil three layers that intertwine with each other but can still be analytically separated according to how they posit evil in respect with the subject of this experience. the first, most archaic layer of the experience of evil is spoken of in the language of “stain” or “defilement” (pellauer, 2007, p. 36; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 25-26). ricoeur defines defilement as “an act that evolves an evil, an impurity, a fluid, a mysterious and harmful something that acts dynamically – that is to say magically” (ricoeur, 1969, p. 25). the idea of defilement includes the notion of a stain or blemish that infects from without. defilement is not a stain, but like a stain. it is a symbolic stain. it is an idea of a quasimaterial something that is harmful through its invisible properties and works in the manner of a force in the field of our undivided psychic and corporeal existence. the symbolism of stain is archaic and narrow in the sense that, at this stage, evil and misfortune are still quite the same (ricoeur, 1969, p. 27). evil and misfortune, doing ill and faring ill – suffering, sickness, death, failure are not yet distinguished from eac h other. all possible sufferings, all diseases, all death, all failure are transformed into a sign of defilement. this misfortune and suffering is interpreted as a punishment or a revenge (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 2930, 41). suffering is a punishment for the violation of an interdict or order. suffering is the price that has to be paid for the violation, to “satisfy” the claim of purity for revenge. this primordial idea of defilement connected to supernatural vengeance is felt subjectively as primitive dread. “man enters into the ethical world through fear and not through love” (ricoeur, 1969, p. 30), as ricoeur puts it. also, this dread is something more than fear of death or suffering. it is existential dread, or dread in the face of a threat which aims at a diminution of existence, a loss of the personal core of one's being. the dread associated with defilement is difficult to put into words, but it still needs to be expressed. defilement enters into the universe of man through speech, or the word, its anguish is communicated through speech. also, the opposition of the pure and the impure is spoken. “a stain is a stain because it is there, mute; the impure is taught in the words that institute the taboo,” says ricoeur (ricoeur, 1969, p. 36). the opposition of the pure and the impure raises the question of purification (ricoeur, 1969, p. 35). defilement is a symbol of evil, so it has to be dealt with symbolically. the ablution is a symbolic washing of the stain. but it is not produced in any total and direct action, it is always signified in partial, substituted and abbreviated signs. we speak of burning, removing, chasing, throwing, spitting out, covering up, and burying the evil. these are symbolic acts that stand for a total action addressed to the person taken as an undivided whole. the opposition between the pure and the impure is also social in nature (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 36, 39). a man is defiled in the sight of certain men and in the language of certain men. those who latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 7 have violated the order are removed from contact with their fellow citizens and excluded from public and sacred spaces. i noted previously that the dread and the opposition between the pure and the impure need to be expressed in words. ricoeur says that this dread also makes the defiled person conscious of himself (ricoeur, 1969, p. 41). consciousness discovers the unlimited perspective of selfinterrogation. man starts to ask questions like: “what sin have i committed in order to experience this failure, sickness or misfortune?” the meaning of the stain needs to be acknowledged and confessed. even though the confession of the stain is partly magical in nature, and a symbolic washing, the dread put into words also has an ethical quality (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 41-42). it is not only and simply a cry; it is also an avowal. as such, it involves a demand for a just punishment. man wants a just retribution. if a man sins and is punished, we really think he should be punished as he has sinned. retribution and punishment, when just, also bring back order (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 43-44). and true punishment is that which restores order and through this produces happiness. to suffer punishment and pay the penalty for one's faults is the only way to be happy. what is aimed at in vengeance and punishment is expiation. punishment is given in order to take away defilement. order is affirmed both outside of the guilty person and within him too. vengeance and expiation aim at amendment, the restoration of the personal worth o f the guilty person through just punishment. stain in the big book in the text of the big book of aa one can find a layer where alcohol and alcoholism are spoken of as magical powers that infect the alcoholic from without. recovery is said to start when the alcoholic admits to being “powerless over alcohol” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 71). the alcoholic feels he is ill in a mystical way that is inexplicable to himself, those near to him and even to the doctors that are treating him (alcoholics anonymo us, 1939, pp. 6, 17, 3, 37, 42). the big book presents alcohol as a substance that has the properties of a magical evil force. first, the alcoholic is absolutely powerless and defenseless against the first drink (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 24, 43). he feels that alcohol has taken his will power away in some obscure way: “o ur human resources as marshalled by the will, were not sufficient; they failed utterly. lack of power, that was our dilemma” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 57). second, alcohol as a power is almost a demonic “cunning, baffling, powerful” force (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 70-71). chapter 11 has a telling description of the alcoholic’s experience of this power: “as we became subjects of k ing alcohol, shivering denizens of his mad realm, the chilling vapor that is loneliness settled down” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 165). one of the founders of aa, bill, recalls the experience of this force in the following words: “i had met my match. i had been overwhelmed. alcohol was my master” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 17). latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 8 the powerlessness that the alcoholic feels when confronted by the demonic power of alcohol evokes an indescribable dread in him. bill again: “no words can describe the loneliness and despair i found in that bitter morass of self-pity” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 8). moreover, this dread gets even apocalyptic tones in the big book: “...then would come oblivion and the awful awakening to face the hideous four horsemen terror, bewilderment, frustration, despair” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 165). the similarities between a stain that inflicts a material substance, a disease inflicted in a human being and symbolical defilement are also noteworthy here. the big book portrays alcoholism as a disease that is a kind of curse inflicted upon the alcoholic. the other founder of aa, dr. bob, for example, speaks of recovery as release from a curse: “it is a most wonderful blessing to be relieved of the terrible curse with which i was afflicted” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 192). also, this curse is seen to be some kind of a punishment: “to be doomed to an alcoholic death or to live on a spiritual basis are not always easy alternatives to face” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 56; italics mine). i noted earlier that the opposition between the pure and impure is communicated through words. the big book makes a clear distinction between those drinkers who are true alcoholics and those who are not. the true alcoholic is someone who cannot take even o ne drink without grave, often fatal, consequences: “...once he takes any alcohol whatever into his system, something happens, both in the bodily and mental sense, which makes it virtually impossible for him to stop” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 33). alcohol is portrayed as a kind of taboo and the line is crystal clear: “these allergic types can never safely use alcohol in any form at all” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 4). the opposition between the pure and the impure is also social in nature and, not surprisingly, alcoholics evoke strong feelings of disgust and hatred in their fellow men. the alcoholic is maybe not totally excluded from the community, but he is bound to withdraw from social interaction gradually: “the less people tolerated us, the more we withdrew from society, from life itself” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 165). in the last stages of this social exclusion the alcoholic is shut out of all normal social interaction and lives in “health resorts, sanitariums, hospitals and jails” (alco holics anonymous, 1939, p. 120) if he manages to avoid the lonely destiny of an alcoholic death. so, the condition of the alcoholic is in part spoken of in the symbolic language of defilement. this language also applies for recovery. for example, as the alcoholic is confronted by the demonic power of alcohol, it is logical that he should turn to an even higher power, that is, god, in his need for help. the big book states that the alcoholic is beyond human help and that “his defense must come from a higher power” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 55). now, the obverse of the symbols of stain and defilement are such symbols as ablution and purification. in the big book recovery is spoken of symbolically in these terms. for example, in order to recover the a lcoholic has to “clean house,” that is, confess his wrongdoings, ask for forgiveness, and repair the damage done (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 95, 111). god is asked in the sixth step of the recovery program to “remove from us all the things which we ha ve admitted are objectionable” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 76). also, “the alcoholic problem” latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 9 is something that will, during the recovery process, be “removed” or “taken away” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 69). i noted earlier that punishment aims at restoring order and taking away defilement. in the light of this it is natural that the recovery program includes steps for restoring order such as the amendments of the steps eight and nine. the big book also makes an explicit connection between the restoration of the outer order with that of the inner state of the recovering alcoholic. his personal worth, selfesteem and social standing are restored as he goes on with his “housecleaning”: “we are going to know a new freedom and a new happiness. (…) we w ill comprehend the word serenity and will know peace. (…) that feeling of uselessness and selfpity will disappear” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 96). sin according to paul ricoeur, there is a divergence in meaning between defilement and sin, and this confusion is inscribed in the reality of the feelings and representations of evil (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 47-50). the representations of sin and defilement contaminate one another sometimes to the point of becoming indistinguishable. for example, the assault o f demonic forces is often experienced as the counterpart of the absence of the god. in any case, the category that determines the usage of the notion of “sin” is that of “before” god. sin is also a dimension of the penitent's existence which opens up new possibilities for the examination of conscience and the interrogative thinking that goes with it. sin is foremost a fault before the eyes of god (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 50–51). this implies the idea of an anthropotropic god, a god who is essentially turned toward man. man finds himself implicated in the initiative taken by someone who is concerned about him. the experience of sin is found in a dialogical relationship, in the exchange between vocation and invocation (pellauer, 2007, pp. 36-37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 50-52). the situation is centered in the word, in an utterance of god and an utterance of man. sin is a violation of the covenant, of a personal bond. the holy will is expressed in laws, commandments and other utterances and the “knowledge” of sin is in proportion to these utterances. the demand that god addresses to human beings is an infinite one and this creates an unfathomable distance and distress between god and man (pellauer, 2007, pp. 36 -37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 55-56, 59). the consciousness of s in is also intensified by a tension between attempting to obey specific, finite commandments, and this infinite demand. the law expounds on how a person may be a sinner (through idolatry, filial disrespect, etc.), not that he or she already is one. this introduces a new tone to the feeling of the experience of evil, one of anxiety rather than terror or dread. this sense of anxiety is further intensified with the symbol of (a day of) judgment. sin is a violation of the bond between man and god (pellauer, 2007, pp. 36-37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 69, 72). man does not listen and he revolts; god is jealous and angry. man is filled with pride and arrogance even though god is omnipotent. god gives the law that man breaks. sin is a loss of a personal or communal relationship, but the idea of a broken relationship also includes the possibility of repairing that relationship, the possibility of redemption, pardon, and return. a latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 10 broken bond is still a relation and, in the movement of invocation, the sinner becomes fully the subject of sin. sin also includes negative notions of missing the mark, rebellion, deviation, straying from the path, and even being abandoned by god (pellauer, 2007, pp. 36-37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 79-81). the counterpoint of these is the possibility of seeking god, returning and being pardoned. but sin is not solely negative but also something positive (pellauer, 2007, p. 37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 81-86). sin is experienced as something real. sin is something within the absolute sight of god and the consciousness of sin raises a need in the sinner to see the truth of his situation, to see the situation as seen by god. this seeing gives rise to self-awareness, to the question of the meaning of acts and motives. as such, sin is something that people can repent. as a positive force sin is also something “in which” man is caught (pellauer, 2007, p. 37; ricoeur, 1969, pp. 87-93). evil is something that captivates, binds, and possesses. the obverse of these symbols is liberation. the man held by sin is a man to be delivered, saved, bought back. sin in the big book in the big book, alcoholism is portrayed as an inexplicable and fatal illness that inflects its victim in a magical way. from the viewpoint of the symbolism of evil it is interesting to see how the text connects the idea of a curselike illness to the notion of sin. the big book presents the alcoholic’s drinking as a sign of deeper problems. the movement from stain to sin starts with the following words: “o ur liquor was but a symptom. so we had to get down to causes and conditions” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 76). what are these “causes and conditions?” the text says that the alcoholic's failure is caused by “self, manifested in various ways” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 76). the alcoholic is selfcentered and this egocentrism manifests itself commonly in such “character defects” as resentment, anger, selfishness, dishonesty, and fear. this self-centeredness is sin because it blocks the alcoholic off from god. i noted earlier that sin is foremost a violation of a personal bond. the big book says that the alcoholic in his pride and arrogance puts himself in the place of god: “first of all, we had to quit playing god” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 75). the alcoholic's drinking is a symptom of egocentrism, of arrogant disregard of god's will. a counterpoint, and as such, a condition for recovery, is humility before god. the recovery program suggests (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 71-72) that the alcoholic should turn his will and his life over to the care of god (step 3). he is also advised to humbly ask god to remove his shortcomings (step 7). moreover, he should seek through prayer and meditation to improve his conscious contact with god and pray for knowledge of his will for him and the power to carry that out (step 11). interestingly, the big book suggests that it is god's will that the alcoholic should follow the recovery program. the text says that god can and will relieve the alcoholic of his illness if sought. how one can find god is, according to the authors, the main object of the big book and the recovery program (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 57). also, those who do not recover are latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 11 “people who cannot completely give themselves to this simple program” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 70). the implication is clear. god wants to relieve the alcoholic if he follows the “god-given program” (kurtz, 1979, p. 187). whereas ideas of pride and arrogance point to something active and thus powerful, the alcoholics of the big book also speak of experiences of being lost and having gone astray. these symbols envisage a total situation, a state of being astray or lost, a state of alienation or dereliction (ricoeur, 1969, p. 73). the authors of the big book speak of their experience of the illness in similar terms. with the first step, the alcoholic admits to be powerless over alcohol and that his life has become unmanageable (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 71). he has lost “all the things worth while in life” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 28) and lives only to drink. correspondingly, recovery means taking steps in a new direction, trudging “the road of happy destiny” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 179). recovery is rediscovering life by seeking god (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 167). i noted earlier that sin is also something in which man is caught, something that binds. the idea of sin as a binding force is clearly expressed in the so called third-step prayer where the notion of sin as self-centeredness is combined with the idea of someone captive o f sin: “god, i offer myself to thee – to build with me and to do with me as thou wilt. relieve me of the bondage of self, that i may better do thy will” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 75, italics mine). the symbolism of delivery is thus strongly related to recovery in the big book. in the strategically significant “three pertinent ideas” recovery is expressly spoken of as relief. god will relieve alcoholism if sought (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 72). the symbols of stain and sin diverge in an interesting way when the big book speaks of recovery. recovery from the alcoholic illness is seen as a removing, rooting or taking away of sins or shortcomings but also as relief from the bondage of self and taking steps on a path towards a new vision and way of life. guilt according to paul ricoeur, “guilt” refers to a radically individualized and interiorized experience of the unworthiness at the core of one's personal being (ricoeur, 1969, p. 7). whereas “stain” and “sin” are objective in a way, guilt is the subjective awareness of the guilty man of his situation (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 100-101). the guilty consciousness confesses its guiltiness in a personal, internalized way (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 101-107). personal guilt arises the “i” that accuses itself by asking: “what is it that i have done?” the guilty consciousness feels the burden of evil and becomes the measure of evil. guilt also has degrees. while sin is a qualitative situation – it is or it is not – guilt designates an intensive quantity, capable of more and less. while a man is radically and entirely a sinner, he is more or less guilty. within a scale of offences, a scale of penalties is conceivable, too (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 108 -118). the metaphor of the tribunal is connected with the registers of the consciousness of guilt. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 12 questions about which law has been broken and the true responsibility of the offender arise. the degree of guilt and the corresponding penalties are taken into consideration. a guilty consciousness can also be a delicate and scrupulous consciousness (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 118-138). ricoeur says that scrupulousness is the advanced point of guilt in that it carries to the extreme both the personal imputation of evil and the polarity of the just man and the wicked man. scrupulousness is a thoroughgoing and voluntary heteronomy, and pharisaism is an example of this mode of consciousness. to the pharisees, the torah is revelation and the revelation is torah. with scrupulousness we also get the idea of merit – the idea that the worth of a man issues from the worth of his acts. but pharisaism shows also the limit of this kind of religious scruple. here, the godman relation is confined to a practical relation of a will that commands and a will that obeys (ricoeur, 1969, p. 133). guilt can also become a curse and a hell of its own (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 139-143). this is because man is powerless to satisfy all the demands of the law. man will never be justified by the law because perfection is infinite and the commandments are unlimited in number. selfrighteousness, or the attempt to reduce sin by observance, becomes sin itself. this is the pauline “curse of law” (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 140, 142). most important in the symbolism of guilt, however, is that what is in question now is someo ne who is at the same time both captive of evil and responsible for it. ricoeur recapitulates this experience and his analysis of the primary symbols of evil in the concept of the servile will (ricoeur, 1969, pp. 151-152.). this concept, however, is not directly accessible. if one tries to give it an object, it destroys itself, for it short-circuits the idea of a free will and the idea of servitude. even though the concept of the servile will is inaccessible directly, it can be – and is – spoken of indirectly with the primary symbols of evil: guilt, sin and stain. these symbols intertwine so that even guilt cannot, in fact, express itself except in the language of “captivity” and ”infection” inherited from the two prior stages of sin and defilement. guilt in the big book the theme of the guilty consciousness revolves in the big book around the “moral inventory” of the fourth step and the confession of sins of the fifth step of the recovery program. the program suggests that (we) alcoholics should first do a “searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves” and then admit “to god, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 71). the idea of the moral inventory is to take an objective look, a god's gaze, at one's deeds. the big book compares this to a commercial inventory that a business takes (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 76-80). it is a “fact-finding and fact-facing process,” an “effort to discover the truth about the stockin-trade.” it should be a “searching” and “fearless” look at one's life. first, the alcoholic is advised to look at all those cases where his self-esteem, pocketbook, ambitions, and personal relationships have been hurt. he should also take a look at his own mistakes: “whe re had we been selfish, dishonest, selfseeking and frightened?” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 79). latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 13 the moral inventory is a thoroughgoing account of how the sinfulness of the alcoholic, that is his self-centeredness, manifests itself concretely in his life. the idea of the objective truth becomes the idea of the self-accusing consciousness that tries to measure its own guilt and responsibility. “where were we to blame?,” the alcoholics are urged to ask and also to list their faults before them “in black and white” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 80). this moral inventory is followed by the confession of the fifth step (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 84-85). this confession is first made to god, which accentuates the fact that the alcoholic is guilty before god. confession is also made to another human being and the reasons for this seem to be pragmatic. confession to another human being is a check against selfdeception and it also teaches the alcoholic “humility, fearlessness and honesty” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 85). release from guilt is achieved through repentance, forgiveness, and mercy. the moral inventory and confession are followed in the recovery program by steps 6 and 7 where the alcoholic turns to god and humbly asks him to remove his “defects of character” or “shortcomings,” that is, asks for forgiveness and mercy (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 88-96). the amends of step eight and nine are made in order to ask for forgiveness from those that the alcoholic has harmed and also to repair the damage done. the text says that the alcoholic will probably be forgiven by the ones he has harmed. it states with regard to the alcoholic’s experience that: “in nine cases out of ten the unexpected happens. sometimes the man we are calling upon admits his own fault; so feuds of years' standing melt away in an hour. (…) o ur former enemies sometimes praise what we are doing and wish us well. occasionally they will offer assistance” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 90). with god, the alcoholic can rely on forgiveness and mercy. as mentioned earlier, the big book states that god will release the alcoholic of his alcoholism if sought (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 72). release from alcoholism is interpreted also to be a sign of god's mercy and grace. regarding the theme of the guilty consciousness and particularly that of scrupulousness, it is interesting to note that according to the big book moral inventory, confession, repentance, asking for forgiveness, and making amends should continue on a daily bas is after the process has been started (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 97-98). the tenth step of the recovery program suggests that the alcoholic should continue to take personal inventory and, when he is wrong, should promptly admit it. he should also pra y for knowledge of god's will for him and the power to carry it out (step 11) and practice the principles of the recovery program in all his affairs (step 12). alcohol is a subtle foe and the alcoholics get only “a daily reprieve contingent on the maintenance of” their “spiritual condition” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, pp. 97-98). the big book seems to imply that the alcoholic is relieved of his condition through his actions, or works. this idea is also included in the conception that the alcoholic will recover by following the “god-given” 12-step recovery program. on the other hand, those who are bound to make the program itself a burden and a curse for themselves are advised against the sin of selfrighteousness. right after the presentation of the recove ry program the big book teaches the right attitude for the program: “no one among us has been able to maintain anything like perfect latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 14 adherence to these principles. we are not saints. the point is, that we are willing to grow along spiritual lines. the principles we have set down are guides to progress. we claim spiritual progress rather than spiritual perfection” (alcoholics anonymous, 1939, p. 72). (concerning works and faith, see also lobdell, 2004, pp. 203-237; mercadante, 1996, p. 96.) the symbolism of evil and recovery above, i have interpreted the symbolism of evil of the big book of aa. i have tried to decipher what the text says and what it talks about when it talks about the alcoholic's experience of evil by using such symbols as stain, sin and guilt. but what does all this have to do with the alcoholics of real life who may confront this symbolism on the pages of the big book or in aa meetings? first, the text of the big book plays an important part in recovery in that it proposes to its reader a new mode of being and a new capacity for knowing himself or herself – a new way of seeing the world. according to ricoeur “to interpret is to follow the path of thought opened up by the text, to place oneself en route towards the orient of the text” (ricoeur, 1981, p. 162). this kind of interpretation that complies with the injunction of the text, that follows the “arrow” of the sense of the text and tries to think accordingly, in turn, initiates a new selfunderstanding. thus, when appropriating the text, the reader is “enlarged in his capacity of self-projection by receiving a new mode of being from the text itself” (ricoeur, 1976, p. 94). according to ricoeur, interpretation is “the process by which disclosure of new modes of being – or if you prefer wittgenstein to heidegger – of new forms of life – gives to the subject a new capacity for knowing himself” (ricoeur, 1976, p. 94). ricoeur here opposes the self, which proceeds from the understanding of the text, to the ego, which claims to precede it: “it is the text, with its universal power of world disclosure, which gives a self to the ego” (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 94-95). the notoriously famous problem of the “hermeneutical circle” is stated on an ontological level instead of taking it to mean a subjectivistic coincidence of psyches or even the understanding of the intention of the author or the original readers of the text (ricoeur, 1976, pp. 92-94). the text of the big book provides the alcoholic a new way of seeing the world and being in the world. it accomplishes this by using various discursive procedures such as the different symbols of evil that i have interpreted above. this symbolism of evil gives meaning to the alcoholic's blind, equivocal, and scandalous experience of evil that would shut up in itself without it (ricoeur, 1969, p. 7). the recovering alcoholic finds on the pages of the big book commonly shared symbols of stain, sin, and guilt with which he or she can express the experience of evil associated with alcoholism. the primary symbols of evil give a metamorphosed transcription of the world. the alcoholic of the big book is cursed by a magical illness, overwhelmed by the demonic power of alcohol. s/he has also fallen into sin. his or her relationship with god is arrogant and defiant; s/he has set himself in the place of god. s/he is also captive of his or her own ego which manifests itself, for example, as fear, resentment, selfishness, and dishonesty when the alcoholic unsuccessfully tries to live by self-propulsion. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 15 on the other hand, the symbolism of the big book also tells what recovery or release from the evil power of alcoholism is. the alcoholic has to admit his or her powerlessness over alcohol, respect the taboo, and refrain from the first drink. s/he has to confess his sinfulness and guiltiness, repent, ask for forgiveness, and repair the damage done. foremost, s/he needs to turn humbly to god and repair his or her relationship with him. moreover, one can claim that the recognition and confession of evil liberates in itself. according to ricoeur, evil and freedom are so closely linked that the two terms imply one another mutually (ricoeur, 1974, pp. 431-432). when a person takes upon himself the origin of evil s/he lays aside the claim that evil is a thing, something observable in physical, psychic or social reality. when s/he says: “it is i who have acted,” s/he asserts that there is no evil-being, there is only the evildone-byme. to take evil upon oneself is an act of language that imputes the evil act to oneself. this imputation posits in me the identity of the moral subject through past, present and future. i acknowledge that i could have acted and can act otherwise, freely. in this sense, one can claim that the symbolism of evil of the big book has a certain liberating power. even though the first, archaic symbol of stain posits evil to be a magical force that infects from without – alcoholism as a curse – the later, more advanced symbols of sin and guilt reveal this dialectic of evil and freedom. the big book portrays alco holism to be essentially alienation from the reality of self, others, and god (k urtz, 1999, p. 216). in order to recover, the alcoholic may follow the path of thought opened up by the text and find a symbolism that gives him or her the capacity to see alco hol, himself or herself, others and god in a new light. s/he may receive from the text a new mode of being. s/he may confess his illness, sinfulness and guiltiness and start to take responsibility for his past, present and future life. in the symbolic words of the big book s/he may “trust god and clean house” – and be “relieved of alcoholism.” references alcoholics anonymous. (1939). alcoholics anonymous. the story of how more than one hundred men have recovered from alcoholism. new york, ny: works publishing company. (reproduction published by the anonymous press.) alcoholics anonymous. (2010). information on a.a. retrieved from http://www.aa.org/lang/en/subpage.cfm?page=1 fingarette, h. (1989). heavy drinking. the myth of alcoholism as a disease. berkeley, ca: university of california press. klemm, d. (1983). the hermeneutical theory of paul ricoeur. a constructive analysis. lewisburg, pa: bucknell university press. kurtz, e. (1979). not-god. a history of alcoholics anonymous. center city, pa: hazelden. kurtz, e. (1999). why a.a. works. the intellectual significance of alcoholics anonymous. in e. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 16 kurtz, the collected ernie kurtz (pp. 177–228). new york, ny: authors choice press. kurtz, e. (2008). the collected ernie kurtz. new york, ny: authors choice press. lobdell, j. (2004). this strange illness. alcoholism and bill w. new york, ny: aldine de gruyter. mercadante, l. (1996). victims and sinners. spiritual roots of addiction and recovery. louisville, ky: westminster john knox press. pellauer, d. (2007). ricoeur: a guide for the perplexed. london, uk: continuum. ricoeur, p. (1969). the symbolism of evil. boston, ma: beacon press. ricoeur, p. (1974). the conflict of interpretations. essays in hermeneutics (d. ihde, ed.). evanston, il: northwestern university press. ricoeur, p. (1976). interpretation theory: discourse and the surplus of meaning. fort worth, tx: the texas christian university press. ricoeur, p. (1981). hermeneutics & the human sciences (j.b. thompson, ed.). paris, france: cambridge university press. ricoeur, p. (2008). from text to action. london, uk: continuum. simms, k. (2003). paul ricoeur. new york, ny: routledge. stolberg, v. (2006). a review of perspectives on alcohol and alcoholism in the history of american health and medicine. journal of ethnicity in substance abuse, 5(4), 39-106. tiebout, h. (1999). the collected writings. center city, mn: hazelden. vaillant, g. (1983). the natural history of alcoholism. cambridge, ma: harvard university press. white, w. (1998). slaying the dragon: the history of addiction treatment and recovery in america. bloomington, il: chestnut health systems. white, w. (2000). addiction as a disease: birth of a concept. counselor, 1, 46-51, 73. the twelve steps of alcoholics anonymous 1. we admitted we were powerless over alcohol that our lives had become unmanageable. 2. came to believe that a power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity. latvanen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 12 17 3. made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of god as we understood him. 4. made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves. 5. admitted to god, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs. 6. were entirely ready to have god remove all these defects of character. 7. humbly asked him to remove our shortcomings. 8. made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all. 9. made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others. 10. continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it. 11. sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with god, as we understood him, praying only for knowledge of his will for us and the power to carry that out. 12. having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs. microsoft word hoveycraigfinal.docx corresponding author: richard hovey, phd email: rbhovey@gmail.com faculty of dentistry, mcgill university journal of applied hermeneutics february 7, 2012 the author(s) 2012 learning to live with osteoporosis: a metaphoric narrative richard hovey and robert craig abstract a philosophical hermeneutic research approach was chosen to explore the meaning of living with osteoporosis, a degenerative bone disease, through the narratives authored by twelve participants. the findings provided in this article offer a perspective of how one’s shifting sense of self-renewal was expressed through osteoporosis-specific metaphors, which explicated a transformative process of how one learns to live well with osteoporosis. three metaphors were identified and interpretively named the shattering, the surrendering, and the dance. consideration was given to how an interpretation of these findings, through metaphor, may benefit others living with osteoporosis, and how those diagnosed in the future can benefit from shared understandings and conversations about the meaning of living with osteoporosis. as persons endeavored to make meaning of living with their illness, metaphors provided a useful common ground and invitation for discussion, story-telling, and the development of supportive relationships – all implemented as educative methods to positively transition the impacted persons’ physical, emotional, and social traumas toward the possibility of self-renewal. keywords illness narrative, osteoporosis, metaphor, patient experience, philosophical hermeneutics, transformational learning theory language is the fabric that weaves individual lives in and out of the lives of others. (hovey & paul, 2007, p. 58) osteoporosis is sometimes called the silent thief because it steals-away bone mass without any discernible symptoms (osteoporosis canada, 2011). however, over time, when this illness manifests through its diagnosis, or from the first fracturing of the person’s bones, its capacity to disrupt and indiscriminately invade multiple dimensions of one’s health is often overwhelming (crossley, 2003; hovey & paul, 2007). when we are in good health, we take for granted our capacity to engage, move, work, socialize, and play almost effortlessly and without concern for active participation within our personal, physical, social, hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 2 and relational worlds (hovey, 2012). however, a diagnosis of osteoporosis, with or without a bone fracture, can dramatically change one’s sense of self-efficacy and alter the ability to meaningfully participate in our lives (cripe, 2009; hovey, 2006). illness disrupts our lives and creates new personal narratives to describe how we engage in, and interpret, our world. from the inconvenience of a common cold or flu to a diagnosis of cancer, cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, or osteoporosis each presents a unique and specific set of reactions, perceptions, and expectations (fife, 1994; frank, 2009; hovey, 2006; hovey & paul, 2007; hydén, 1997; nielsen, brixen, & huniche, 2011; shapiro, 2011; solimeo, weber, & gold, 2011). the diagnosis, treatment, and possibility for recovery are contingent on multiple factors such as the extent and severity of the illness, the degree of vulnerability of the ill person, and possible restrictions for social engagement with others. communication within the context of the health care providerpatient relationship necessitates finding a common ground where the medical practitioner and the patient and family can achieve an understanding of what is happening to them. in this article, we describe a philosophical hermeneutic inquiry that explored the experience and meaning of people living with osteoporosis. our intention in this article is to offer insights and understandings from participants who have learned, or are learning to live, with osteoporosis, and with these insights, to better develop health care education, promotion, and practice initiatives that enhance the lives of people living with osteoporosis. we explored the transformative process of learning to share the collective understanding of others` illness experiences, and provide firsthand narrative accounts of persons living with osteoporosis. these perspectives offer new insights into how people learn to live with this chronic illness and help to interpret key lessons for those providing care (cripe, 2009; hovey, 2006; hovey et al., 2011). for persons living with osteoporosis and their families, the sharing of osteoporosis stories offers a possibility to connect with others both pragmatically and relationally – about the meaning of living with this illness (charron, 2006; hovey & paul, 2007). background persons living with a diagnosis of osteoporosis can be regarded as an illness to be treated, “within a medical system whose currency is diagnosis, difference is often defined through disease” (metzl & poirier, 2004, p. vi). in addition to the physical treatment of the illness, those impacted have also identified as persons living in a world comprised of relationships, families, social-relational networks, educational endeavors, work, activities, and self precariously hinged on the hope for a healthy and meaningful future (black, 2002; hovey, 2006; smith & sparkes, 2008). consequently, conversations about the impacts of osteoporotic symptoms on one’s physical well-being also commonly include references to the social, relational, and personal implications of osteoporosis on their previously-known ways of living their lives (hovey, 2006; metzl & poirier, 2004). having osteoporosis means that it is always on my mindand with the need to be careful, but sometimes you get thinking about something else and you start to do things as you always have and then you think:“should i be doing this?” the above quote from a participant illustrates the transition from being diagnosed with osteoporosis to living under constant vigilance with previously-taken-for-granted activities, in order to prevent further injury hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 3 and suffering. osteoporosis can become a constant concern and through and its expression, the illness narrative helps in humanizing the experience (frank, 2009; tamas, 2009). as human beings we create narratives to interconnect and make sense of all aspects of our internal and external lives through humanizing narratives (hovey, 2006; hovey & paul, 2007). concerning illness narratives, frank (2009) reminded us, “…that all aspects of life need narration. to be human is not simply to live a life but to reflect on that life by telling it in multiple ways to multiple audiences, throughout the course of our lives” (pp. 187-188). the illness narrative becomes part of our inclination to humanize illness, rather than enduring the “dehumanization that [osteoporosis] patients have experienced at the hands of some medical practitioners and in the cultural imagination.” (deshazer, 2009, p. 216; hovey, 2006) the illness narrative becomes an opportunity, cathartically and therapeutically, for the person telling their experiences to help locate the illness within their life context and to help in the process of learning to live with chronic illness and to engage in self-renewal (fife, 1994; lange, 2004; rimmon-kenan, 2006). through the explication of illness narratives, the opportunity to learn with, from and about, those living with illness as a knowledgeable other person is created (hovey & craig, 2011). engagement with, and learning from, people living with osteoporosis affords the means to incorporate their narratives as knowledge that informs healthcare, illnessspecific education, and real-life priorities, providing support and hope during these new and confusing experiences for those following in the footsteps of being diagnosed with a similar illness. the illness narrative offers both general understandings of the traumas of being diagnosed with a serious illness, as well as a description of the illness’ particular symptoms and characteristics. the persons diagnosed with cancer, diabetes, heart problems, osteoporosis, and other illnesses will create narratives that are specific to their understanding and meaning of how their illness will influence the totality of their lives (hovey, 2012). methods the participants this philosophical hermeneutic research project took place in two major canadian cities. ethical approval was obtained from both the university of calgary and the calgary health region ethics review board. volunteer participants were recruited and after careful explanation of the parameters of the study, they signed an informed consent document. indepth individual interviews were conducted with 12 persons; one male and 11 female participants. participants’ ages ranged from 32 to 83 years, with a mean age of 61.8 years. the length of time living with osteoporosis – by approximate date of diagnosis – was from 2 to 30 years among participants (mean of 10 years). the age of being first diagnosed with osteoporosis ranged from 30 to 65 years of age, with a mean of 52 years of age. research approach the philosophical hermeneutics approach engaged involved the selection of participants who could best inform a perspective on a particular topic and invite a new understanding of it. in philosophical hermeneutics, interpretation is an ongoing process that begins with initial understandings of the research protocol and continues through the interview process, transcription, and textual analysis. these understandings are finally explicated through interpretive writing. this approach relies on a deep engagement with the topic and textual data, and attempts to generate new or differhovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 4 ent understandings through a circular interpretive movement from the narrative parts of the experience to the whole rather than extracting or codifying themes. philosophical hermeneutic participant interviews are semi-structured and conducted in a manner such as, to allow the meaning of the content and context of the experience to be fully expressed from the participant’s perspective, to remain the central topic of exploration. when participants tell of their personal experience out loudinto the worldit joins with the common experiences of others (davey, 2006; gadamer, 1989; kearney, 2003, 2011). the shared collective of unique experiences lead interpretively to an understanding that is respectful of both the singularity of people and their experiences of an event, as well as what is commonly understood when interpreted among many others who have shared in a similar experience. accounts of human experiences, however, are always interpreted from the participant’s social-cultural, historical, and other specific characteristic perspectives. the individual narrative becomes part of the common history of the participant group by showing how one narrative account is an instance of something that can be more commonly understood. it can be stressed, however, that research findings and current understandings are always only provisional to further interpretations. the philosophical hermeneutic research process is inclusive of other perspectives and understandings about a topic. the consequence is that, as narrative texts are read and re-read, they open up other possible interpretations and new understandings. kearney (2011) wrote that hermeneutics: …[r]efers to the practice of discerning indirect, tacit or allusive meanings, of sensing another sense beyond or beneath apparent sense. this special human activity may in turn call for a method of second order, reflective interpretation involving a process of disclosing concealed messages, either by a) unmasking covered-up meaning (hermeneutics of suspicion) or b) by disclosing surplus meaning (hermeneutics of affirmation). (p. 1) metaphor as common ground being diagnosed with an illness such as osteoporosis turns lives upside down. understanding a person`s unique experience necessitated the consideration of a three-part relationship, where one person comes to an understanding with another, engaging with that second person about a topic or conversation, which consequently leads to a new third aspect of the relationship: a shared understanding of the topic common to both participants. this is the work of gadamer’s dialogical hermeneutics: when two people understand each other, they always do so with respect to something and, in this project, the something the topic being understood was the experience of learning to live with osteoporosis (gadamer, 1989). it is through an interpretive process, where the experience of the individual narrative becomes located within others as a collective, that reveals the commonalities within the illness experiences of others and contributes to the collective experience of something through narrative and conversation (davey, 2006; frank, 2009; kearney, 2003). the experiences of the research participants presented in this article were articulated through interpretations of their illness experiences in order to create a common ground for the person and medical practitioner, and enhance the possibility for understanding of such a complex topic (gadamer, 1989; hovey, 2012; lakoff & johnsen, 2003; mccrickerd, 2000; sturmberg, martin & o'halloran, 2010). as gadamer (1989) stated, hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 5 …if a person transfers an expression from one thing to the other, he [she] has in mind something that is common to both of them; but this in no-way needs to be generic universality. rather, he [she] is following his [her] widening experience, which looks for similarities, whether in the appearance of things or in their significance for us…this is its fundamental metaphoric nature. (p. 429) the utility of metaphor provided a vehicle in which the common encounter of living with osteoporosis could be represented within a context that was representative of the unique experiences shared by the participants (hovey, 2006; 2012). these experiences included the reality that an intended, expected, and anticipated life was interrupted by an unexpected, unplanned, and unwelcomed illness. osteoporosis became a serious disruption from a normal and predictable life journey to a transformative passage that involved suffering, courage, and commitment toward healing and self-renewal (gadamer, 1996; hovey, 2006; shenk, davis, & murray, 2008). findings transformational journeys: diagnosis to self-renewal chronic illness may “reduce a person to an exhausted heap, sunk into a sofa or a bed, helpless, weighed down by the unbearable weight of flesh, bone tired” (caputo, 1993, p. 208). i guess it was anger, i don’t know, maybe depressed; i quit the gym and i stopped exercising and i had been exercisingyou knowfor twenty-five years and then i ended up like this. so i just said ‘forget it’ and i stopped everything and i gained weight and i led a much more sedentary lifestyle now. i think that is all because i was very upset and i didn’t talk about it with anybody. shattering. a participant recounts the traumatic and disorientating moment of finding out that she had osteoporosis: “you know undoubtedly when you are first diagnosed it is very traumatic. have you ever seen snow white and the seven dwarfs? do you remember when the queen diverted to the witch? she looked exactly how it feels.” certainly, this participant was not describing a transformation in her appearance similar to that of the witch in the story; rather, in that moment, her quote provides insight into the powerful influence of her diagnosis in distorting her image of self. the participant described her situation emotively through metaphor, as a means of interpreting a wide range of experiences, which were concerning changes to their life since their diagnosis of osteoporosis. participants described the shattering effect of osteoporosis, not only of their own physical conditions, but also the impacts of diagnosis on their emotional and social-relational conditions (hovey, 2012). “i feel like a stupid, little old lady. i don’t think of myself as a little old lady but mincing along [on an icy path] trying to make sure that i’ve got my foot squarely planted so that i’m not going to take a topple.” in this case, the participant deals with both a new perception of herself of becoming “a little old lady” who now must be extremely cautious as she walks with uncertain footing, with a topple becoming a frightening and life-altering concern. a fracture sets into action several life-altering changes created by pain, possible deformity, social isolation, and an altered sense of identity (black, 2002; petrie & weinman, 2006; vitacca, isimbaldi, mainini, & melazzini, 2011). “i am sixtythree and i just turned sixty-three, but i did not think that ‘old’ happened, until you are eightyand so i didn’t intend to think about it [ageing] for a while.” consequently, the explanation of these journeys provided a porhovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 6 trayal about the complex series of progressions, adaptations, and new learning told by the participants. another participant detailed: “it is shattering when you are first diagnosed; you think, my god! i mean most people have this vision of the little old (osteoporotic) woman and the pain is tremendous.” metaphorically and practically, the experience of osteoporosis began with a shattering of bones, which represented the biomedical treatment of the illness, as well as how it influenced and shattered the social-relational aspects of participants’ lives. the shattering was not just about fracturing a bone but also being forced to live their lives differently as the participants became overwhelmed by fear, apprehension, and rapid changes to their perception of self and social identity (crossley, 2003; hovey, 2006; hovey & paul, 2007; kearney, 2003; smith, & sparkes, 2008;). there was also the accumulated frustration that came from living for many years with something unnamed before their osteoporosis was diagnosed and treated. it was traumatic! i was really upset because i could not ski and then i broke my ribs around that time too and so that further indicated that i had osteoporosis. then i broke two toes last year and i either have a broken or cracked rib right now so i just knowyou knowevery time one of these things happens it’s more loss and so you have to grieve. some participants described their initial fracture(s) as a complete surprise: “the fall was nothing.” they were unusual: “i was only lifting a box that i had always lifted;” a minor fall or a sudden, insignificant turn that resulted in a painful and disabling fracture. medical intervention provided crucial care after the shattering; healthcare practitioners eventually made the correct diagnosis, which then led to the appropriate treatment that promoted healing and the future maintenance of their bone density. one participant provided an account of the seriousness of osteoporosis; not the illness per se, but the pain associated with undiagnosed fractures: “i fell down one winter and i had to lie in the snow bank because i could not get up. every time i tried to get up, the pain was excruciating, and i would pass out from time to time. i thought this was a really dangerous situation, the wind was howling like mad, coming across the driveway onto the lane and sidewalk, and i was getting covered with snow.” although these participants’ medical needs were eventually met, finding support for their psychosocial needs was more difficult or nonexistent. a sense of not being heard resulted in stress, depression, and frustration, all of which have been felt by many individuals when time was not taken to fully explain the situation. one of the other things that stressed me [because of osteoporosis] was regarding my grandchildren. i can’t lift too much and i didn’t have it [osteoporosis] with the two oldest grandchildren, but the two youngest, i never related to or bonded quite as close to them because i could not lift them up or cuddle them. the implications of being diagnosed with osteoporosis, with or without fractures, meant the lives of theses participants were shattered, altered, and devastated. “i had no understanding of what i should be doing: ‘how can i help myself?’ i had no idea...” as well, pain medications had effects, “i find if i take too much pain medication it does go to my head. it makes me feel blocked.” the trauma of the diagnosis and fracturing were overwhelming conditions of the shattering. in this phase, the metaphor of being and feeling shattered, predominate as the biomedical aspects of the illness are at the forefront for the patient. knowing darn well if i slip and land on my butt i’m going to be two inches shorter hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 7 when i get up because it is mostly my spine that is really bad. in addition, it was just that feeling of ‘i can’t be like i used to be.’ so influential is pain on us that we withdraw from all external experience of the world. every culture knows something of the profound internalization involved in suffering and the endurance of pain. here we face real difficulty, which is at the heart of learning to live with osteoporosis: the pain, fear of fractures, and an uncertain future (gadamer, 1996; hovey & paul, 2007; vitacca et al., 2011). someone’s suffering from the pain and discomfort of osteoporosis can be amplified by their sense of loss-of-self, where a person living with a chronic illness witnesses a previously held concept of “self” dissolve into another, less positive vision (elofsson & ohlen, 2004; hovey & paul). people without the capacity to develop an equally valuable and meaningful alternative self-concept may be more likely to succumb to the powerful emotions associated with loss of independence, social isolation, perceived changes in social interactions, and thoughts of being a burden to others (hovey, 2006; vitacca, et al., 2011). thinking about the self in this negative light creates profound emotional trauma and suffering that is not often recognized or purposely addressed within the biomedical view of the patient. the process of learning to live with osteoporosis involved a transformation from the ill patient to person living with osteoporosis. the initial focus on the physical manifestations of the illness the shattering centered on the humanistic, social, occupational, intellectual, emotional, and environmental aspects that challenged the participant’s participation within their day-to-day of being-in-the-world. surrendering. the next metaphoric interpretation revealed a second common experience that the participants identified as a critical period of transition as people learning to live with osteoporosis. this became a surrendering to the implications of osteoporosis as a life to be lived differently. this is not a negative surrendering as in giving up hope or losing a battle; rather, it means giving in to the functional reality of their situations with the inherent difficultly and uncertainty of attempting to negotiate and piece fragments of their lives back together as different. the capacity to let go of previously-held perceptions of oneself enabled the consideration of new possible ways of being in the world (rossiter, 2007). the participants who surrendered were able to consider and internalize new possibilities for themselves. during the surrendering phase, adaptation to change became the key element that influenced the reconstruction and perceived quality of their lives. faced with limitations, it became essential to make new experiences and activities meaningful. the pre-osteoporotic world needed to give way to the present. the familiar, anticipated, and expected day-to-day life was reassessed and a new perception of quality of life negotiated. surrendering to that which could not be changed opened up new possibilities. for one participant, working through living with osteoporosis meant meeting a patient advocate supporting others living with osteoporosis. i met someone, a person named em [an osteoporosis patient advocate] who was doing a walk across canada. my company was sponsoring her. i helped with the walk, got to meet em and speak to her, and got myself straightened out. she helped me to put things into perspective what i should be doing, how i could do better. well, it was very fortunate that i came to this understanding because em opened up for me a different and more hopeful vision of what it means to live with osteoporosis. hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 8 personal self-renewal is contingent not only on learning how to manage the physical aspects of osteoporosis but also the other dimensions of health such as, emotional, social, occupational, environmental, intellectual, and spiritual implications (hovey, 2012). for another participant, finding a way to renew her sense of participation was through the acknowledgment that she could no longer be a physical gardener in the way she knew prior to living with osteoporosis. the substantial demands of gardening would be too risky. however, her surrendering provided an alternative means to continue her passion for gardening, which was to teach others. it is always a loss, but, i guess during my life i’ve had to cope with lossso you know you get quite good at it and so i said to myself, ‘i’ll find something else to do,’ and i’ll belong to the ‘green thumbs’ which you know we work in the greenhouses and we have a great time and i still do volunteer work teaching others how to garden. the transformational process is not a passive one as this participant explained: “the patient has to take charge. as an osteoporosis patient, you must take charge of your health, get all the information you can and then put it all together as a lifestyle for yourself. and it seemed to work well for me.” this participant’s surrendering to the reality of her osteoporosis reflected her transition to becoming an empowered patient: “patients don’t understand they think they have to be told what to do, they have to be compliant. i can be compliant, but i am not, because i question why i am doing anything. i don’t do something unless i know why.” the transformation of persons from shattering to surrendering meant finding meaningful ways of re-engaging their world. the transition between these phases is not absolute, as the person living with osteoporosis may find himself or herself cycling back and through each of these phases. although for the person living with osteoporosis a new fracturing of a bone would undoubtedly provide a possible setback within this process, the event is generally not new. as such, their accumulated personal and shared experience of living with osteoporosis and the gathering of valuable lessons and resources over time can help them to prevent and/or cope with future fractures when they occur. although the chronic illness cannot be healed, nor is full recovery from the illness a possibility, the person will often find a means to contextually re-interpret and re-negotiate their life with osteoporosis. life does reconcile with the illness, the pain becomes increasingly manageable, environments are altered for safety, relationships change and evolve, and the implications of living with osteoporosis are no longer unknown and uncertain. although the symptoms of osteoporosis may manifest for the person living with osteoporosis, the surrendering transitions them into a life where the illness is not always at the forefront of the person’s day-to-day world. when the person learns to lives with osteoporosis, it creates a partnership with the illness, one not by choice but through practicality, in which they can begin to move together in the world. dance. the dance represents a transformation from the initial shattering of the person’s life, through learning to work with osteoporosis, toward negotiating a partnership with the illness. the dance metaphorically represents the movement toward self-renewal through a dance with a new partner: osteoporosis. although the illness can only be managed but not cured, it does not have to preoccupy every moment and life-event within that person’s life. i have had to re-create my independence [from osteoporosis] in a different way. hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 9 you have to be really creative. for example, i used to go cross-country skiing with a very nice group of people; i had to give that up so i had to find some substitute. i now go for walks and swim with another group of people. and i found that i had to substitute activities rather than cut out activities. you have to substitute what you liked to do with something else that you really like to do. the key is to find something else that is going to give you a sense of satisfaction from that activity. this participant’s description of what it means to willingly and mindfully let go of certain activities (surrendering) in order to discover new and meaningful others, is an example of the person’s transformation to new ways of life that may be better suited to living with osteoporosis. several participants also talked about the “gifts” of living with osteoporosis: the gift of very great friendships; i met so many wonderful people because of my osteoporosis. while working with osteoporosis canada, many of us supported each other and created a strong network of women helping others. we were a very experienced group, sharing what we knew and experienced about osteoporosis. giving back to others became an additional aspect of this transformational phase for many of the participants. one became an advocate and mentor to her family, friends, and others by telling as many people as possible about her diagnosis and what she has learned during her experiences. as a result of my unexpected diagnosis, i called my sisters who are both younger than me and said ‘listen, look at me. i’m the sign of health…’ where the both of them are not and nowhere as healthy as me. ‘and i’ve got osteoporosisso you better start pushing to find out if you got it.’ well sure enough, they have it (osteoporosis) and they have it worse than me and they are younger than i am. a relief… in that i was able to help them get onto the path of health. characteristically, the dance meant a transition and ‘letting go’ of some aspects of preosteoporosis life toward other possibilities, in order to be able to consider a new possible self (rossiter, 2007; shenk et al., 2008). “you can choose to dwell on your losses, or you can choose to do something positive. there are things i will never be able to do again. i would love to go skating, or play golf. my husband and i used to golf all the time. now i am scared to death to do it one mighty swing and i am back to where i was.” the idea of being cautiously attentive to one’s external world became extremely important. the dance with osteoporosis entailed (re) negotiating an altered future for many, including increased vigilance to the dangers present in their external environment, while finding new ways to engage in life. “if i choose to do more positive things, assessing the risks of what i do, i also choose to know what my losses have been and say, ‘okay, but i can also still do so many things’.” living well with osteoporosis means becoming a partner in the dance of life, no longer being led by the disease. discussion the physical symptoms associated with osteoporosis present a particular set of new restrictions, challenges, and acquired limitations for those affected. the transformative aspect of self-renewal begins with physical considerations because pain alienates one from oneself (gadamer, 1996). for the person living with osteoporosis, pain became an ever-present fear and substantive obstacle on the journey to self-renewal. as one participant shared, “the days i’m in a lot of pain, i just withdraw. i hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 10 just lie down and when you are not yourself, so you tend to withdraw.” gadamer (1996) explained that, with … pain, we cannot see paths and solutions in advance, yet we must ask ourselves if there will not always remain new possibilities. we encounter for example the loss of personhood. this happens within medical science when the individual patient is objectified in terms of a mere multiplicity of data. but the question is whether the unique value of the individual is properly recognized in this process. (p. 81) a person suffering with the pain and discomfort of osteoporosis may often realize that the physical symptoms can be amplified by one’s sense of loss of self (black, 2002; elofsson & ohlen, 2004; hovey, 2006). those who lack the capacity to reconceptualize and reconfigure an equally valuable and meaningful self-concept are more likely to succumb to the powerful emotions associated with a loss of independence, social isolation, perceived changes in social identity, and the perception of becoming a burden to others (vitacca et al., 2011). thinking about oneself in this negative light can create profound emotional trauma that is not often recognized within the biomedical view of suffering (black, 2002; charmaz, 1983; hovey & paul, 2007; smith & sparkes, 2008; tamas, 2009). the findings from this research study can provide insight into the transformative aspects of people living with, and working through, osteoporosis in order to re-engage with their lives as meaningfully as possible. this reengagement enlisted a process of critical reflection, in which transforming one’s perceptive provided the opportunity to create new understandings of how one adjusts to living with osteoporosis and facilitates a process of self-renewal. in this regard, the process of learning to live with osteoporosis was described metaphorically as the shattering, surrendering, and the dance. this process, described using metaphoric images from participants’ narratives, aligned closely with the tenets of transformational learning theory (mezirow, 1995; mezirow, 2000). transformational learning theory suggests that transformative learning occurs when individuals confront and engage in critical reflection on disorienting dilemmas such as a diagnosis of a serious illness. this traumatic, disorienting diagnosis for participants was the shattering and the pain of the physical, emotional, and social-relational impacts of chronic illness and cancer. (brigham, 2011; fife, 1994; lange, 2004; merriam, caffarella, & baumgartner, 2007; mezirow, 2003) the transformation toward ‘working through’ osteoporosis meant an in-depth exploration of the illness’ meaning to those affected with consideration of the roles, relationships and actions required to achieve a renewed sense of personal identity (black, 2002; hovey, 2006; kearney, 2003; smith, & sparkes, 2008; weston, norris, & clark, 2011) this process of working through their diagnosis, and finding meaningful ways to re-engage in selfrenewal was identified by researchers as the surrendering. the kind of learning involved in this stage is one in which people living with the diagnosis of osteoporosis cannot return to how they once were. for such a renewal to occur, people learning to live with osteoporosis must negotiate and work through the chaotic disorder of their new worlds (merriam et al.; hovey; lange; mezirow). researchers, through the metaphor of a dance, interpreted the result of the negotiation toward self-renewal, where the person living with osteoporosis negotiates a way to move through life. this dance is one of grace and dignity where the person engages the world differently but with a sense of self-renewal. hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 11 as biomedical diagnoses and treatment protocols for osteoporosis become more efficient and effective, our attention to the person learning to manage illness and its influences expands. living with a chronic health condition means that even when it is being wellmanaged, it is always present. the transformation of a life – from fracture and/or diagnosis of osteoporosis, to a functional and favourable result – cannot be described as a linear trajectory from diagnosis to cure. rather, the conversations described a series of interconnected experiences that have been – for the purpose of this article – defined as the shattering impact of diagnosis, the participant’s surrendering to a new reality and the partnered dance of living a renewed and significant life. learning to live with osteoporosis not only means learning to live with physical manifestations and symptoms but also with disquieted thoughts about the present and future. as the pain and discomfort subside, a space is cleared for the humanizing activities of self-renewal. as rossiter (2007) stated, … transition involves rehearsing attitudes and behaviours, visualizing oneself as having achieved a hoped-for goal represented by a possible self. rehearsing and visualizing enable one to assess one's own comfort with moving in that direction. it is at this point that some possibilities are discarded and others more fully embraced. (p. 93) the shattering, surrendering and the dance, as osteoporosis-specific metaphors, describe the transformative process worked through by all participants as part of their unique life experiences. as individuals who have shared in a common experience, each transformation and each step toward self-renewal depended upon a multiplicity of factors such as the severity of the symptoms; the individual’s personality; experience with resiliency and adaptation; levels of education, social support, medical support; and age at the time of diagnosis (hovey, 2006; vitacca et al., 2011). each individual experienced unique and widely-differing moments as part of living with osteoporosis, and yet the transformation towards a renewed reality through the development of new emotional and socialrelational experiences was shared among all affected. return to person centeredness patient/person centeredness calls for ethical consideration and an interdisciplinary approach to learn from those who have already experienced osteoporosis; to discover how they became able to live with their illness (beadle-brown & mansell, 2004; crossley, 2003; hovey et al., 2011). this research project provided the means to ask questions and collect instructive narratives meant to complement and extend objective medical discourse of chronic illness, treatment, and recovery. while changes to one’s physical characteristics and personhood occur slowly and over time, a diagnosis of osteoporosis can abruptly alter our perception of ageing (beadlebrown & mansell; black, 2002). in this article, we provide insight into the experience of learning to live with osteoporosis from the personal perspectives of those who have worked through this process and desire to share their experiences with other patients, healthcare providers, and those working with older adults. understanding the situation of others who have experienced the shattering, surrendering and the dance, as osteoporosisspecific metaphors, describe the transformative process worked through by all participants as part of their unique life experiences. hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 12 traumas can help to create the possibility for better treatment and care, as well as engagement that is softer, more sensitive, and more humanistic. intervening, with a greater understanding of what it means to live with osteoporosis, can allow for specific educative and health promotional activities when, and as, they are needed. encouraging patients’ transformational progress toward self-renewal can not only enhance recovery, but also teach those living with osteoporosis to adapt to the shattering effects of chronic illness, not only to new symptoms and pains, but to a renegotiated way of living in their world. conclusion within our socially-constructed perspectives about those who offer knowledge, information, and education concerning illness experiences, we frequently defer to healthcare and research experts and their understanding of the patient experience. undeniably, healthcare experts’ knowledge and understanding of illness and treatment are invaluable to patients’ long-term recovery from the ‘silent thief of bone mass.’ what may be ignored in the medical process is that the person living with the illness truly becomes the expert of living with that condition. other ways of knowing and understanding which extend to the continuum of care can only be gained with the first-hand experience of something that happens to us or to others. these new and different everyday experiences, narrated from patients as lay-experts, inform the ontological perspective of living with osteoporosis. we need to consider the experiences people accumulate throughout their illness as knowledge guiding the development of health promotion, education, and health care practices, to inform recovery strategies and personcentered practices that enhance the lives of people living with osteoporosis (hovey & craig, 2011). the use of participant narratives to generate osteoporosis-specific metaphors provided an alternative and meaningful explication of the transformational process toward selfrenewal experienced by persons living with chronic illness. understanding the transformational processes (shattering, surrendering, and the dance) specific to this journey entails adopting specific learning and intervention practices that can anticipate and meet the patient/person’s learning needs as they are situated within the process of self-renewal (hovey & craig, 2011). furthermore, we offer in this research that all people learning to live with osteoporosis are multidimensional and dynamic, rather than static and predictable, with the capacity to meet significant challenges throughout their lifetime. from this perspective, the research participants living with osteoporosis revealed a transformative process of selfrenewal defined by the shattering, surrendering, and the dance; these metaphoric interpretations can provide others with the framework to engage in additional conversations about the meaning of living with illness, and the meaning of adapting to new ways-of-being. we issue the invitation to other researchers to interpret and share the diverse experiences of people living with osteoporosis, relying on their expertise of living with a lifechanging chronic illness. we should consider the experiences people accumulate throughout their lives as expert personal knowledge that may guide our approach to developing effective health promotion techniques, educational interventions, and self-management methods for those living with and those who will live with chronic osteoporosis in the future. through careful listening to these experiences, educators, health care providers, and promotion experts can begin to come to an understanding that will inform healthcare practices from a humanistic perspective. on pahovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 13 tient/person centeredness, beadle-brown and mansell (2004) provided that “it is individualized, in that it is intended to reflect the unique circumstances of the individual person…in both assessing and organizing what needs to be done” (p. 1). in this study, a patientcentered approach for research provided new and different perspectives to inform and complement patient treatment protocols and practices going forward. by sharing the experiences of those living with osteoporosis with other patients, health care professionals, and educators, we can begin to truly understand the life-altering impacts of chronic illness, and allow others to follow in those welltrodden footsteps, softly and with purpose. declaration of conflicting interests the authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. bios richard hovey, phd is an associate professor in the division of oral health & society unit, faculty of dentistry, mcgill university with an interest in understanding the experiences of vulnerable / underserved populations. robert craig, ba earned his bachelor of arts (hon.) from the university of toronto and is a researcher with a focus on interprofessional education, patientcentered care, and simulation in health care. references beadle-brown, j., & mansell, j. (2004). person-centred planning or person-centred action? policy and practice in intellectual disability services. journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, 17(1), 1-9. black, h.k. (2002). different ways to hurt: an elderly woman’s narrative of suffering. journal of aging and identity, 7(1), 3-15. caputo, j. d. (1993). against ethics: contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. bloomington, in: indiana university press. charmaz, k. (1983). loss of self: a fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. sociology of health and illness, 5(2), 168-195. charron, r. (2006). narrative medicine: honoring the stories of illness. new york, ny: oxford. cripe, l. d. (2009). the discovered story: the evolution of truth in cancer narratives. literature and medicine, 28(2), vi-x. crossley, m. (2003). let me explain: narrative employment and one patient’s experience of oral cancer. social science & medicine, 56(3), 439–448. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: state university of new york press. deshazer, m. (2009). cancer narratives and an ethics of commemoration: susan sontag, annie leibovitz, and david rieff. literature and medicine, 28(2), 215-236. elofsson, l. c., & ohlen, b. (2004). meanings of being old and living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. palliative medicine, 18(7), 611-618. fife, b. l. (1994). the conceptualization of meaning in illness. social science & medicine, 38(2), 309–316. hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 14 frank, a. w. (2009). tricksters and truth tellers: narrating illness in an age of authenticity and appropriation. literature and medicine, 28(2), 185-199. gadamer, h. g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). (j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshal, trans.). new york: continuum. (original work published 1975). gadamer, h. g. (1996). the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age. (j. gaiger & n. walker, trans.). palo alto, ca: stanford university press. hovey, r. (2006). what does it mean to live with osteoporosis? (doctoral dissertation). retrieved from proquest dissertations & theses. hovey, r. (2012). assessment in health promotion: deconstruction and metaphoric considerations in a nutshell. in g.d. gilmore (ed.), needs and capacity assessment strategies for health education and health promotion (4th ed.). sudbury, ma: jones and bartlett. hovey, r., & craig, r. (2011). understanding the relational aspects of learning with, from, and about the other. nursing philosophy, 12(4), 262-270. hovey, r., & paul, j. (2007). healing, the patient narrative-story and the medical practitioner: a relationship to enhance care for the chronically ill patient. international journal of qualitative methods, 6(4), 53-65. hovey, r., dvorak, m., hatlie, m., burton, t., padilla, j., worsham, s., & morck, a. (2011) patient safety: a consumer's perspective. qualitative health research, 21(5), 662-672. hydén, l. (1997). illness and narrative. sociology of health & illness, 19(1), 48–69. kearney, r. (2003). strangers, gods and monsters. new york: routledge. kearney, r. (2011). what is diacritical hermeneutics? journal of applied hermeneutics. article 1. kind, s. (2008). learning to listen: traces of loss, vulnerability, and susceptibility in art/teaching. in s. springgay, r.l. irwin, c. leggo, & p. gouzouasis, p. (eds.) being with a/r/tography (pp. 167-178). rotterdam, the netherlands: sense publishers. lakoff, g., & johnsen, m. (2003). metaphors we live by. chicago & london: the university of chicago press. lange, e. (2004). transformative and restorative learning: a vital dialectic for sustainable societies. adult education quarterly, 54(2), 121-139. mccrickerd, j. (2000). metaphors, models, and organisational ethics in health care. journal of medical ethics, 26(5), 340–345. merriam, s., caffarella, r., & baumgartner, l. (2007). learning in adulthood: a comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). san francisco, ca: john wiley & son. metzl j.m., & poirier, s. (2004). editors’ preface: difference and identity in medicine. literature and medicine, 23(1), vi–xii. mezirow, j. (1995). transformation theory of adult learning. in m.r. welton (ed.), in defense of the lifeworld (pp. 39-70). new york: state university of new york press. mezirow, j. (2000). learning to think like an adult: core concepts of transformation theory. in j. mezirow (ed.) and associates, learning as transformation: critical perspectives on a hovey & craig journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 3 15 theory in progress (pp. 3-33). san francisco, ca: jossey-bass. mezirow, j. (2003). transformative learning as discourse. journal of transformative education, 1, 16-37. nielsen, d. s, brixen, k., & huniche, l. (2011). men's experiences of living with osteoporosis: focus group interviews. american journal of men’s health. 5(2), 166-76. osteoporosis canada. (2011). retrieved september from: http://www. osteoporosis.ca/index.php/ci_id/5526/la_id/1.htm petrie, k.j., & weinman, j. (2006). why illness perceptions matter. clinical medicine, 6(6), 536-539. rimmon-kenan, s. (2006). what can narrative theory learn from illness narratives? literature and medicine, 25(2), 241-254. rossiter, m. (2007). possible selves in adult education. new directions for adults and continuing education, 114, 87-94. shapiro, j. (2011). illness narratives: reliability, authenticity and the empathic witness. journal of medical humanities, 37(2), 68-72. shenk, d., davis, b., & murray, l. (2008). in their own words: using narratives to teach gerontology. gerontology & geriatrics education, 29(3), 239-247. smith, b., & sparkes, a. c. (2008). contrasting perspectives on narrating selves and identities: an invitation to dialogue. qualitative research, 8(1), 5-35. solimeo, s.l., weber, t. j., & gold, d.t. (2011). older men's explanatory model for osteoporosis. gerontologist, 51(4), 530-539. sturmberg j. p., martin, c. m., & o'halloran, d. (2010). music in the park. an integrating metaphor for the emerging primary (health) care system. journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 16(3), 409-414. tamas, s. (2009). writing and righting trauma: troubling the autoethnographic voice. forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: qualitative social research, 10(1) article 22. vitacca, m., isimbaldi, c., mainini, a., & melazzini, m. (2011). the frail person and his caregiver: cure, care or simultaneous care? a conceptual article. journal of medicine and the person, 9, 6–12. weston, j. m., norris e.v., & clark, e. m. (2011). the invisible disease: making sense of an osteoporosis diagnosis in older age. qualitative health research, 2(12), 16921704. microsoft word nielson corrected proof.docx corresponding author: cynthia r nielsen, phd university of dallas email: cynthia.nielsen@gmail.com journal of applied hermeneutics march 15, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 gadamer on the event of art, the other, and a gesture toward a gadamarian approach to free jazz cynthia r. nielsen abstract several prominent contemporary philosophers, including jürgen habermas, john caputo, and robert bernasconi, have at times painted a somewhat negative picture of gadamer as not only an uncritical traditionalist, but also as one whose philosophical project fails to appreciate difference. against such claims, i argue that gadamer’s reflections on art exhibit a genuine appreciation for alterity not unrelated to his hermeneutical approach to the other. thus, by bringing gadamer’s reflections on our experience of art into conversation with key aspects of his philosophical hermeneutics, we are able to better assess the viability of gadamer’s contributions to contemporary discussions of difference and alterity. keywords hermeneutics, hermeneutical aesthetics, aesthetics, philosophy, jazz, philosophy of music i. introduction while appreciative of gadamer’s contributions to philosophical hermeneutics and what we might call “hermeneutical aesthetics” (nicholas davey’s term), several distinguished contemporary philosophers have at times painted a somewhat negative picture of gadamer as not only an uncritical traditionalist, but also as one whose philosophical project fails to appreciate difference. for example, jürgen habermas and john caputo criticize what they see as gadamer’s oversimplified account of power relations and distorted discourses in his explanation of the formation and maintenance of traditions. caputo suggests that gadamer belongs among those philosophers nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 2 who “cannot tolerate the ambiguity of the flux.” 1 robert bernasconi argues that gadamer’s understanding of dialogue and his notion of assimilation and the fusion of horizons “have the common feature of diminishing alterity.”2 however, an examination of gadamer’s reflections on art exhibits a genuine openness to and appreciation of difference, not unrelated to his hermeneutical approach to the other. thus, by bringing gadamer’s reflections on our experience of art into conversation with key aspects of his philosophical hermeneutics, we are able to better assess the viability of gadamer’s contributions to contemporary discussions of difference and alterity. the first part of my essay (sections two through six) focuses on key concepts in gadamer’s account of art’s dynamic ontology and our experience of art. such concepts include the play structure of art, hermeneutic identity, tarrying with a work, and contemporaneity. the opening sections provide not only a discussion of these central themes, but they also (1) draw attention to the various ways in which difference and otherness are integral to gadamer’s account, and (2) utilize relevant musical examples that prepare the reader for a more focused discussion of a gadamerian approach to free jazz in section seven. by highlighting how gadamer’s understanding of art possesses a dialogical play structure, is characterized by identity and difference, requires actively engaged spectators and auditors, and is amenable to what many criticize as an unintelligible musical expression, viz. free jazz, gadamer’s project is shown as other-affirming and open to ambiguity and dynamism. that is, the essential structures and concepts characterizing gadamer’s reflections on art are likewise central to his overall hermeneutical project, and hence are not rightly described as un-attuned to difference or other-negating. rather, gadamer’s philosophical project upholds difference, since it requires a dialogical interplay between self and other that creates the possibility for a transformative experience. ii. play and the play structure of art play as a participatory structure is central to gadamer’s account of hermeneutics and the ontology and phenomenology of art. in his analyses of play in general and the play of art in particular, gadamer emphasizes the active engagement of the spectator or auditor. that is, not only do the players play the game, but also the observers actively participate in the movement or life of the game. one frequently witnesses this type of spectatorial “playing along with” in organized sports. for example, fans bring their baseball gloves in anticipation of catching a ball and in so doing intensely follow the movement of the game sometimes even diving onto the field itself. the spectator, in other words, is drawn into the spirit of the game and thus is “played by” the game just as much as the players themselves. as gadamer puts it, “the real subject of the game […] is not the player but instead the game itself. what holds the player in its spell, draws him into play, and keeps him there is the game itself.”3 1 john d. caputo, radical hermeneutics. repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project (indianapolis: indiana university press, 1987), 263. see also, jürgen habermas, “the hermeneutic claim to universality,” in the hermeneutic tradition: from ast to ricoeur, eds. gayle l. ormiston and alan d. schrift (albany: suny press, 1990), 245-72. 2 robert bernasconi, “you don’t know what i’m talking about: alterity and the hermeneutical ideal,” in the specter of relativism, ed. lawrence schmidt (evanston: northwestern university press, 1995), 178-94, here 180. 3 hans-georg gadamer, truth and method, 2nd ed., trans. and rev. joel weinsheimer and donald g. marshall (new york: continuum, 2004), 106. (hereafter, tm.) [hans-georg gadamer, hermeneutik i: nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 3 similarly in the play of art, the viewer or listener engages in a back-and-forth interplay with the work, which, in the case of art, allows the work to emerge in a communicative event. here too, the artwork draws the viewer or auditor into its movement and expects a countermovement or response. as with the game, spectatorial participation in the event of the work is not reducible to the subjective experiences of the players or audience members. rather, as davey observes, “the game analogy implies that the act of spectatorship contributes to bringing what is at play within the artwork into fuller being. the spectator just as much as the artist performs a role in realizing the subject-matters art brings into play.”4 play by nature requires an other. this other may be another human, an animal, or an object such as a ball, a child’s toy, or an imaginary object. even in the most basic expression of play, one finds a move and a countermove. this same to-and-fro movement structures our experience of art. as gadamer is fond of saying, the artwork address us; it calls out to us and expects a response. given an artwork’s complexity, we must continually return to its call, lingering with its message as we attempt to grasp its meaning(s) and allow them to impact our present understanding of our world and ourselves. thus, our very experience of art, as gadamer understands it, requires an intense listening and responding to the other’s “voice.” iii. hermeneutic identity and tarrying with the work both the play involved in art and the spectator’s active participation in it constitute essential moments of the dynamic ontology and temporality structuring art’s event. in section four, i discuss art’s temporal structure and how gadamer’s notion of contemporaneity describes art’s unique temporality in relation to the spectator’s participation and comportment. here i turn first to gadamer’s analyses of art’s dynamic ontology, paying special attention to his descriptions of hermeneutic identity and tarrying with a work. hermeneutic identity claims that the work’s identity necessarily involves difference and thus always entails openness to future possibilities, allowing for multiple presentations or enactments of the work over time.5 more specifically, for gadamer, the being of an artwork is inseparable from its various presentations, which bring out new and previously unrealized possibilities of the work. enactment or presentation is thus an essential feature of an artwork’s being. phenomenologically speaking, art exists only in presentation and performance. accordingly, art as experienced requires an ongoing “rebirth” and sustaining through both players and audience participants. the notes on the page are silent without a performer to give them life. likewise, the wahrheit und methode: grundzüge einer philosophischen hermeneutik, gesammelte werke band 1, 4. auflage (tübingen: j. c. b. mohr (paul siebeck), 2010),112. hereafter, wm.] 4 nicholas davey, unfinished worlds. hermeneutics, aesthetics and gadamer (edinburgh: edinburgh university press, 2013), 48. 5 on gadamer’s notion of “hermeneutic identity,” see donatella di cesare, gadamer: a philosophical portrait (bloomington, in: indiana university press, 2013), esp. 59–60. as di cesare explains, “[a]ny new identity that comes to light is an identity that forms itself only in difference. thus difference becomes indispensable for identity” (ibid., 60). see also, gerald l. bruns, “ancients and moderns: gadamer’s aesthetic theory and the poetry of paul celan,” in on the anarchy of poetry and philosophy. a guide for the unruly (new york: fordham university press, 2006,) 33-54, esp. 35-9. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 4 musician, painter, or sculptor creates his or her work to convey something to someone, requiring the work to be displayed or performed in a concert hall or an outdoor gathering.6 art, perhaps even more than simple play, is a communally constituted event. that hermeneutic identity is infused with difference does not mean that a performer or interpreter can simply project arbitrary meanings onto the work. doing so would be to silence the work or do violence to its integrity or structure, thereby disregarding the work’s otherness. nor does hermeneutic identity mean that interpretations or performances cannot be judged regarding their quality. in the case of a poor performance of rachmaninov’s piano concerto no. 2, opus 18, competent musicians or critics may judge the performance as presenting, albeit poorly, the structure (gebilde) of rachmaninov’s work. if there is a true engagement with the work, then every presentation relates to the work’s structure and, and gadamer puts it, must “submit itself [sich unterstellt] to the criterion [maßstab] of correctness [richtigkeit] that derives from it.”7 at the same time, the very being of the work itself is constituted by a built-in indeterminacy or openness to future possibilities enabling new dimensions of the work to emerge over time. however, that we can discern a failed presentation of a work does not imply that there is only one excellent or ideal way for the work to be manifested. on gadamer’s view, it is possible to have many correct, fitting, and even exemplary presentations, enactments, and performances of the same work. here the notion of structure should not be equated with the original composition or entity, as if the original is the ideal or standard that future performances and presentations must copy. on the contrary, future performances of a work often bring out a depth and richness not present in the original. john coltrane’s performance of the popular broadway tune, “my favorite things,” is a case in point. in coltrane’s version, the standard and rhythmically simple three-four waltz time is transformed into a polyrhythmic and densely textured six-eight (and beyond) time. in addition, coltrane adds lengthy improvisatory solos and complex harmonic textures to the original composition. in both the 1959 broadway performance and john coltrane’s, the work emerges and a common structure is discerned; yet coltrane’s performance displays a level of harmonic, melodic, and rhythmic complexity not present in the original. a. the (performed) work as reality not copy gadamer also argues that through presentation (and performance) an “increase in being” [zuwachs an sein] occurs.8 to understand his claim, one must examine his account of the complex relationship between bild and urbild. if presentation (darstellung) is the artwork’s mode of being, how does a symphonic performance or a painting present the work? for gadamer, a 6 as gadamer observes, in the play of art something comes forth that is “intended as something.” moreover, its meanings are reducible neither to mere concepts nor to some activity coordinated with a utility function. see hans-georg gadamer, “the relevance of the beautiful. art as play, symbol, and festival,” in the relevance of the beautiful and other essays, trans. nicholas walker and ed. robert bernasconi (cambridge: cambridge university press, 1986), 24. (hereafter, rb.) [gadamer, hans-georg, “die aktualität des schönen. kunst als spiel, symbol und fest,” in ästhetik und poetik i: kunst als aussage, gesammelte werke band 8. auflage. (tübingen: j. c. b. mohr (paul siebeck), 1993), 115. hereafter, gw8. 7 tm,122. [wm, 127]. 8 ibid., tm, 140. italics in original. [wm, 145]. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 5 presentation or a performance of a work is not a copy of some original or more “real” entity, being, or object. the defining task of a copy is to duplicate as accurately as possible the original. thus its essence is self-erasure or self-effacement; it points not to itself and its particularities but away from itself to what it copies. “[i]ts nature [bestimmung] is to lose its own independent existence [sein eigenes für-sich-sein aufzuheben] and serve entirely to mediate what is copied.”9 a copy’s self-effacement indicates its function as a means, not an end. its independent existence serves this very purpose of self-erasure. by contrast, a painting’s essence is neither self-erasure, nor does it function as a means to some other end. the painting points to itself and how it presents its subject matter. in other words, “one is not simply directed away from the picture [painting] to what is represented. rather, the presentation remains essentially connected to what is represented [die darstellung bleibt vielmehr mit dem dargestellten wesenhaft verbunden]— indeed belongs to it.”10 again, instead of a self-cancelling existence and purpose, the painting’s being—the painting itself—brings out something new in the subject matter that it depicts. thus the painting is more than a mere copy or reduplication of an “original” or more “true” reality; rather, the painting brings out new possibilities and new ways of seeing the “original.” thus, the original becomes more than it was; hence, its being has increased, and yet the two are integrally connected as both participate in presenting the same subject matter—yet a subject matter that itself is always in motion.11 to illustrate further, consider again coltrane’s version of “my favorite things.” coltrane’s performance is the reality or end to which we are directed. that is, his performance is not a selfeffacing copy, a sign pointing beyond itself to the original, as if the goal is merely to reduplicate the original. rather, coltrane’s version presents us with the work in a new key—that is, new possibilities of the work come forth, and we encounter dimensions of the work that did not exist previously (e.g., more complex rhythms, harmonies, improvised solos etc.). yet we identify it as a performance of “my favorite things.” coltrane never intended to merely replicate the original, but rather to enact his version of the work, which has its own independent existence while remaining connected to the original and extending, as it were, its life or being. in short, a work’s being is increased in the event of art’s unfolding over time in various enactments that bring forth new aspects of the work. so far i have established that even though the same work is repeated in each new enactment, subsequent enactments are not mere copies of an original and thus are not understood as ontologically inferior imitations. instead, gadamer’s notion of hermeneutic identity shows itself in a phenomenon of repetition in presentation that harmonizes structure and freedom. hermeneutic difference thus describes a dynamic yet discernable identity. on the one hand, hermeneutic identity is ever and always infused with difference, dynamism, and open possibilities; on the other, it indicates an identifiable structure that emerges in the communicative event of art’s appearance. as gadamer puts it, “[t]o understand [verstehende] 9 ibid., tm, 138. [wm, 143]. 10 ibid., tm, 139. [wm, 143]. 11 the discussion here pertains to non-abstract paintings in which some resemblance relationship with another object(s) can be discerned. even so, gadamer’s point is that the traditional model of art as representation does not capture the essence of what art is. in modern, abstract paintings, the notion of representation has been abandoned, and the artists themselves, as it were, “show” gadamer’s point. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 6 something, i must be able to identify it. for there was something there that i passed judgment upon and ‘understood’ [verstand].”12 stated otherwise, the work’s identity consists in its presence before me as other, in its being there as something addressing me. the work asks to be understood; it issues a challenge requiring a response.13 here again the emphasis is on the active, engaged listener or spectator: in order to experience a work of art as a communicative event, one must actively participate—one must “play along with” (mitspielen) it. 14 the listener must comport herself to the work as an other expecting something meaningful to come forth. if the viewer or listener approaches the work having already decided that it has no value and thus nothing to say, then the work will remain silent. art is a dynamic, communal event; its happening or occurrence can be thwarted or foreclosed when we comport ourselves to the other with a closed attitude. the same is true of our hermeneutical encounters with others—whether texts or human beings. b. tarrying as ecstatic participation gadamer also emphasizes the importance of tarrying or lingering with a work. to tarry or linger is to become so intentionally absorbed in a work of art that one forgets oneself. as one attunes herself to the work and becomes wholly captivated by it, she is able to see beyond her projects, concerns, and cares; she exists ec-statically, or outside herself. this ecstatic way of being should not be understood as merely passive or private; rather, as gadamer explains: being outside oneself is the positive possibility of being wholly with something else. this kind of being present [solches dabeisein] is a self-forgetfulness [selbstvergessenheit], and to be a spectator [es macht das wesen des zuschauers aus] consists in giving oneself in self-forgetfulness to what one is watching. here self-forgetfulness is anything but a private condition, for it arises from devoting one’s full attention to the matter at hand [denn sie entspringt aus der zuwendung zur sache], and this is the spectator’s own positive accomplishment [leistung].15 when one actively enters into a condition of self-forgetfulness, the occasion for the event of art to emerge in a communicative address becomes viable. as the work comes forth, it makes a lasting claim on the spectator or listener. in other words, the experience of art’s address is not a fleeting aesthetic pleasure wherein one anesthetizes oneself momentarily only to return to one’s 12 gadamer, rb, 25. [gw8, 116]. the english translation deletes the scare quotes in the german text around the word “verstand.” since gadamer placed the scare quotes in the original and likely did so to emphasize the openness and non-exhaustive character of understanding, i have included them in the english translation. 13 gadamer, rb, 26. [gw8, 116-17]. see also, daniel l. tate, “the speechless image. gadamer and the claim of modern painting,” philosophy today 45 (2001): 56-68, esp. 59-61. tate provides a helpful analysis of gadamer’s view that even the most abstract modern art manifests a “unity in tension” capable of addressing us (ibid., 60). 14 see also, bruns, “ancients and moderns,” esp. 35-6. bruns highlights the similarities between gadamer’s theory of our experience of art and our experience of play, noting the emancipatory aspects of each. in both experiences we are caught up in the self-presentation of the work or the game, and we also actively participate in the event. 15 gadamer, tm, 126. [wm, 131]. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 7 world unchanged. rather, one’s world and way of being-in-the-world-with-others is affected—at times radically so. once again, the emphasis is on an engaged, rather than detached spectator or auditor. as one intentionally and with great effort and commitment tarries (repeatedly) with the work, one experiences both a self-forgetfulness due to one’s fully being-there with the work and a selfenrichment via a world-expansion. as gadamer says, “what rends him from everything at the same time gives him back the whole of his being” [was ihn aus allem herausreißt, gibt ihm zugleich das ganze seines seins zurück.]. 16 thus the spectator’s absorbed engagement is an achievement allowing the work’s otherness to emerge.17 iv. contemporaneity and the work’s full presence and nontransparency gadamer intentionally employs the term “claim,” which søren kierkegaard developed in conjunction with his theological reflections on contemporaneity. as observed earlier, a claim is not something fleeting but enduring, enforceable, and is “concretized in a demand.”18 for example, when the gospel is preached, the hearer is presented with a claim of faith and is beckoned to respond. here the words themselves, in a way analogous to the sacraments, bring the reality of the past into the present transforming the one who receives them by altering his world and his view of others. however, the hearer of the gospel message is not merely a passive recipient. she is also challenged to translate and apply the message of salvation to her particular situation. this type of translation, application, or, as james risser puts it, “concretization of meaning that defines the present enactment,”19 is what gadamer means by the term, anwendung, which is often translated into english as “appropriation.” when gadamer claims that every interpretation is an anwendung, he draws attention to the performative (vollzug) dimension of hermeneutic experience. anwendung is thus a “form of practice”20 whereby one learns how to listen properly to voice of the other so that its claims can be brought to bear meaningfully on the present. the result is not, as caputo suggests, to consume the other,21 but to allow the other’s claims to come forth so that my world, practices, and ways of being might be enriched or challenged. gadamer’s emphasis on play, art’s address, and our being drawn in and even arrested by the work are aspects of his critique of the over-subjectivization of aesthetic consciousness; yet his critical remarks should not be interpreted as denying the subject’s experience or, as we have seen, her contribution occasioning the work’s emergence. gadamer repeatedly underscores the artwork’s ability to address the engaged participant directly. however, it appears that one can be 16 ibid., tm, 128. i have slightly modified the english translation. the italicized word indicates my modification. [wm, 133]. 17 see also, daniel l. tate, “in the fullness of time: gadamer on the temporal dimension of the work of art,” research in phenomenology 42 (2012), 92-113, esp. 104. 18 gadamer, tm, 127. [wm, 132]. 19 james risser, hermeneutics and the voice of the other. re-reading gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics (albany: state university of new york press, 1997), 103. 20 ibid., 105. see also risser’s discussion of the crucial differences between gadamer’s hermeneutical project and ricouer’s (102-5). as risser observes, gadamer, unlike ricouer, does not claim that “every interpretation is an aneignung” (103). 21 see, for example, caputo, radical hermeneutics, 115. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 8 drawn into the work in varying degrees of depth (or not drawn in at all.) that is, given its materiality, the immediacy of one’s experience of art’s sensual qualities does not require that one possess knowledge of the particular social and historical factors in which the work first emerged. yet, that person may still be drawn to the work through the “pull” of the work’s sensuous qualities (e.g., dissonant sounds, complex rhythms, a striking juxtaposition of geometric shapes and lines). gadamer’s stress on art as a communicative event and art as addressing us with meaningful content, which requires one to linger repeatedly with the work, suggests that something beyond a (subjective) experience of art’s immediacy is required. in order to respect the otherness of the work, we must take the time to learn its “language.” that is, we must enter into its world, pondering how the interplay of its symbols, sounds, colors, and gestures says something not only in its time and context but in one’s own as well. here it is helpful to mention what daniel tate describes as the artwork’s “paradoxical temporality.”22 that is, its temporality is “marked by an immediate presentness in time and at the same time by a rising above time.”23 building on tate’s notion, one might add that the work’s ability to come forth in the present and communicate meanings in different historical periods should not be equated with timelessness or a denial of art’s social and historical conditioning. artworks (and texts) are historically shaped; they arise, participate in, and belong to various traditions.24 yet great works of art have the ability to draw us in, to captivate us by their sensuous elements— but sensuous elements arranged meaningfully in languages of sound and symbols, which are themselves communally shaped via artistic, social, and other practices and traditions. what i have outlined above suggests a movement beyond erlebnis and to erfahrung. since both words are translated into english as “experience,” the difference between the two is lost. erlebnis is associated with wilhelm dilthey and “emphasizes the distinctness and singularity of the perceived moment.” in contrast, gadamer is concerned with erfahrung, which “emphasizes the cumulative and formative character of experience, as when one speaks of an ‘experienced’ artist or musician.”25 erlebnis highlights the intensity of the present moment and is concerned not with the work’s meaning but with its sensual qualities and sophistications. erfahrung stresses the unfolding, cumulative, and unfinished character of experience; moreover, erfahrung “implies an involvement in the meaning and significance of what is experienced.”26 hence, for gadamer, our experience (erfahrung) of art is something more than an intense, momentary subjective experience (erlebnis); yet, our subjective experience plays an important role in drawing us deeper into art’s communicative address. 22 tate, “in the fullness of time,” 99. 23 hans-georg gadamer, “the artwork in word and image: ‘so true, so full of being!’” in the gadamer reader. a bouquet of the later writings, trans. and ed. richard e. palmer, 192-224 (evanston, il: northwestern university press, 2007), 196. 24 for an instructive explication of gadamer’s understanding of tradition as “an event of repetitive disclosure,” (81) see risser, hermeneutics and the voice of the other, esp. 65-81. in chapter two, risser engages caputo’s (and to a certain degree habermas’) concerns regarding gadamer’s alleged conservatism and backward-looking orientation. 25 davey, unfinished worlds, 70. 26 ibid. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 9 as we have seen, gadamer stresses what he calls the “absolute presentness” of the work that is, the artwork’s ability “to build bridges that reach beyond the enclosure and space in which it originated.”27 i have suggested that this is in part due to the work’s immediacy, its ability to draw us in via its materiality and sensual qualities. however, this is a structured materiality; the work’s sounds and colors are artfully arranged. its structure has a discernable movement that can be perceived even if its meaning(s) remain in many ways opaque and enigmatic. here it may be helpful to consider how achievement relates to contemporaneity. as gadamer explains, contemporaneity means that when a particular work of art presents itself to me, it “achieves full presence [volle gegenwart], however remote its origin may be. thus contemporaneity [gleichzeitigkeit] is not a mode of givenness in consciousness [eine gegebenheitsweise im bewußtsein], but a task [eine aufgabe] for consciousness and an achievement [eine leistung] that is demanded [verlangt wird] of it.”28 thus understood, contemporaneity is not a given, but instead something that the spectator or auditor must in some sense actively bring about. this suggests that the coproductive, participatory activity of the spectator, listener, or interpreter is necessary for the work’s coming-into-presence. the spectator’s or auditor’s achievement of making a past reality present here and now marks the distinctive temporality of contemporaneity. historical distance is not a barrier to the work’s meaningful address; what comes to presence through spectatorial, auditorial, and performative cooperative activity can be re-contextualized and repeated over time. here the event of art—its happening via active participatory engagement—points both to its hermeneutical identity (i.e., identity and difference) and dynamic ontology. the artwork is not a static object whose meaning remains the same; rather, as new performances and interpretations emerge, new (multiple) horizons are fused among the work and its performances and audience members. as is the case in a genuine dialogue among persons, the work as other can challenge and (re)shape one’s horizon. likewise, a community of performers (e.g., musicians) can creatively (yet non-violently) expand the work as they bring out new possibilities over time. still, whatever meanings emerge in art’s event, those meanings are always socially and historically conditioned by communal practices, traditions, and shared discourses. before closing this section, it is important to clarify what gadamer means when he speaks of a work’s “full” or “absolute” presence. although the language is somewhat misleading, he does not mean that when the work is “fully present,” every aspect of the work in that particular encounter is transparent or exhaustively understood. in yo-yo ma’s masterful performances of bach’s cellos suites, the works are fully present for him as performer and for the attuned listener; nonetheless something new and unexpected emerges in each performance. in this sense, the reality of the work is fully present in its various presentations and performances; however, its being is not exhaustively grasped in one’s experience of and participation in it here and now. in other words, the work’s “absolute presentness” and one’s being present with the work can (and does) readily coexist with the notion of an ongoing interplay of hiddenness and manifestation or, in heideggarian terms, concealment and unconcealment. that something is genuinely or fully present does not mean that one can or will ever grasp all that it is; one’s encounter with the reality of its presence might in fact be too much to take in. in such a situation, both participants are fully “there,” as the event of art unfolds. however, it is often the case that the work qua other 27 gadamer, “the artwork in word and image,” 199. 28 gadamer, tm, 127. [wm, 132]. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 10 speaks meaningfully without one comprehending its totality.29 in short, gadamer’s understanding of art and our experience of art’s alterity not only permit but also expect and affirm the work’s enigmatic dimensions. v. art as dialogical interplay in order to bring together several strands of my argument, i turn to discuss our experience of art as a form of dialogical interplay that requires letting the other’s voice—whether dissonant, consonant, or disorienting—sound. as noted previously, the structure of the work manifests an integrity and autonomy—an otherness—that resists my attempts to force arbitrary meanings upon it. such a move would amount to remaking the work in my own image and thus silencing the other’s voice. to interact with it in this way is to do violence to the work and would amount to a monologue rather than a dialogue. for gadamer, a proper (hermeneutical) aesthetic experience with a painting or a musical work is dialogical, and thus by definition requires the other’s voice to sound in and against my own (dynamic) horizon so that my way of seeing the world might be challenged or expanded. as i linger with the work and open myself to its address, what formerly appeared strange may become more intelligible, remain enigmatic, or be a combination of both. nonetheless, as i abide with the work and allow it to come forth, it addresses me in a communicative event that requires my participation and response. hence, to mute the other’s voice would result both in a failed hermeneutic and aesthetic experience. stated otherwise, gadamer’s notion of an event-ful experience of art, poetry, and the like expects and even invites dissonances both to sound and to remain. as noted previously, one need not conclude that a genuine encounter with art requires exhaustive understanding without remainder. here a musical insight proves helpful. harmony itself—especially the complex or extended harmonies of jazz and 20th century music—requires the differences of the notes to sound in their fullness. to eradicate or remove dissonance (i.e., difference) from musical works would render them dull and monotonous. analogously, an authentic or harmonious hermeneutic or aesthetic encounter demands neither that the other become fully transparent nor be reduced to my unison voice. vi. gadamer’s openness to modern art and a coda on tradition when it comes to modern art, gadamer is aware that many artists repudiate or seek to redefine traditional accounts of beauty, form, and proportionality. it is precisely here that gadamer’s position proves particularly insightful in its ability to listen to the voice of the other and thereby to move us beyond traditional understandings of art’s ontology. for example, toward the end of his introductory remarks in his essay, “the relevance of the beautiful,” gadamer poses a series of questions expressing a genuine interest in taking seriously the works of modern artists. 29 perhaps this is something akin to jean-luc marion’s idea of the bedazzling event of the saturated phenomenon. see, for example, jean-luc marion, being given. being given. toward a phenomenology of givenness, 1st ed., trans. jeffrey kosky (stanford: stanford university press, 2002), esp. 199-247. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 11 how can we understand the innovative forms of modern art as they play around with the content so that our expectations are constantly frustrated? […] how are we to understand what duchamp is doing when he suddenly exhibits some everyday object on its own and thereby produces a sort of aesthetic shock reaction? we cannot simply dismiss this as so much nonsense, for duchamp actually revealed something about the conditions of aesthetic experience.30 here gadamer exhibits a genuine openness to artists such as duchamp, whose works are meant, among other things, to provoke and challenge our thinking about what art is and how our experience of art is conditioned by social, historical, and other communal practices. for gadamer, our experience of art is not chiefly about our subjective responses to artworks (although our subjective responses do play a role in our experience). nor is the goal to try and uncover the artist’s intentions or to teach us the proper way to interpret what particular works mean. rather, his aim, from a hermeneutic point of view, is to analyze the conditions or structures of our experience of art in order to clarify “how aesthetic experience is both involved in something larger than itself and reflects (speculum) that larger actuality within itself.”31 thus, one’s meaningful encounter with an artwork always has a “backstory,” and gadamer’s interest lies in understanding what informs, shapes, and conditions that encounter. one aspect of that conditioning is the fact that we belong to multiple traditions linguistic, sociopolitical, aesthetic, etc. prior to my discussion of a gadamerian approach to free jazz (and relevant to that discussion), i want to speak briefly about gadamer’s notion of tradition. that we are situated within and shaped by traditions does not mean that we are unable to oppose, challenge, or alter them and the practices and norms they embody. as complex, socially constructed human artifacts, traditions exhibit a dynamic stability: they can and do congeal for certain periods of time and thus manifest a staying power, yet they are not rigidly fixed. instead, they change over time as new infusions from other voices expand and alter what in an earlier phase were standard practices and established norms. in the following consideration of free jazz, i discuss specific ways in which this process of transforming musical traditions and practices occurred in the transition from bebop and hard bop to free jazz. here i mention briefly one element of tradition-transformation: namely, the creative application of other musical voices whether voices of past, or present musicians in one’s own tradition, or voices of those outside it. jazz luminaries such as miles davis, charlie parker, and john coltrane creatively applied musical insights from earlier jazz masters, 20th century classical music, and afro-cuban and indian music in order to go beyond (trans-gress) jazz norms and develop new practices and musical styles. their creative uses (anwendungen) of others’ voices are not understood as violent or consuming acts. on the contrary, they communicate a profound respect for the others’ achievements and contributions to the tradition(s). thus, by dwelling with the (musical) other in order to learn the other’s language and style—imitating it and yet creating something new—the other’s voice continues to sound into the future, acting as an ongoing tribute to the other’s greatness while also expanding the tradition beyond its previous limits. as gadamer 30 gadamer, rb, 22. [gw8, 113]. 31 davey, unfinished worlds, 47. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 12 himself explains, “tradition means transmission rather than conservation. this transmission does not imply that we simply leave things unchanged and merely conserve them. it means learning how to grasp and express the past anew. it is in this sense that we can say that transmission is equivalent to translation.”32 vii. a gadamerian approach to free jazz we have seen that a key feature of our aesthetic experience is the spectator’s or listener’s active participation. also significant are gadamer’s understanding of art as an event, tarrying with a work, the play-character of art, art’s communal dimensions, and the primacy of art’s address. in the following paragraphs, i highlight how these fundamental aspects of gadamer’s account apply to free jazz. i conclude that a gadamerian approach to free jazz not only allows but requires the voice of the other to sound in its alterity; consequently, gadamer’s hermeneutical aesthetics demonstrates an openness to the other that creates the possibility for selfand world-questioning and even a transformation of one’s way of seeing the world. free jazz, also called the “new thing,” burst forth on the jazz music scene in the late fifties and is frequently associated with names such as john coltrane, ornette coleman, and cecil taylor. an adequate definition of free jazz is notoriously difficult, as each group or musician now recognized as a pioneer or exemplar of free jazz instantiates diverse expressions of the genre. even so, ekkehard jost highlights a “point of agreement” among free jazz groups: namely, they sought to subvert signature practices and norms of traditional jazz that carried over into bebop and hard bop.33 in particular, free jazz musicians were unsatisfied with the constraints of the harmonic, metric, and structural norms that constituted jazz up to hard bop. although the harmonic elements of bebop and hard bop had become increasingly complex compared to earlier expressions of jazz, the structures of standard jazz pieces had become rigid and formalized. as jost explains, in traditional jazz the main purpose of the melody or theme is to establish the harmonic and structural framework for improvised solos. however, “[i]n free jazz, which does not observe fixed patterns of bars or functional harmony, this purpose no longer exists.”34 thus both the form and content of free jazz pieces are highly specific, consisting neither in typical jazz harmonic sequences (ii-v-i, etc.) nor in common structural frameworks (e.g., the aaba form). as a consequence, one cannot continue to recycle standard chord changes and simply write a new melody, which was a common practice until the new thing began to challenge these accepted jazz norms. even within the very same free jazz composition, the form itself can continually morph, as bar lines are porous and allow for new melodic, rhythmic, harmonic, and interactive motifs to develop. given this freedom from functional harmony and rigidified forms, “the members of a group are forced to listen to each other with intensified concentration.”35 another aspect of certain expressions of free jazz is collective or group improvisation. when group improvisation becomes central, the motivic development of the piece is in constant flux as each player responds to and builds upon the work’s ever-changing rhythmic, melodic, and harmonic elements. this creates a dynamic composition in which collective conversation is 32 gadamer, rb, 49 [gw8, 139]. 33 ekkehard jost, free jazz (new york: de capo press, 1994), 9. 34 ibid.,153. 35 ibid., 23. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 13 foregrounded rather than traditional jazz’s emphasis on a single soloist improvising over relatively stable chord-changes. moreover, as is the case with works such as ornette coleman’s “sound gravitation” and “falling stars,” numerous free jazz pieces contain no traditional melody or theme.36 rather, the works are “compositions in sound that grow from the spontaneous interaction of [the] musicians.”37 as one can imagine, such sonic “happenings” are risky and require not only intense, responsive listening among the players, but also high levels of trust, openness, and vulnerability.38 even when one does not fully understand what another member plays, one must listen and respond to the other, anticipating and trusting that s/he has something valuable to say and worth the effort to puzzle through. here one might highlight an ethical dimension involved in collective improvisation: namely, the trust and vulnerability required among the improvisers is not unlike gadamer’s emphasis on the need for openness to the other in order for a genuine dialogical engagement to succeed. after all, gadamer’s notion of openness implies not only that one listen attentively and expectantly to the other, but also that one approaches the other with respect and trust.39 given that one’s presumptions may be exposed as inadequate, misguided, or may even be radically challenged, entering a gadamerian dialogue requires vulnerability and a willingness to take risks. in addition to internal developments within the musical practices themselves, socio-political factors played a role in shaping the music. as many commentators and jazz historians have documented, jazz musicians in america were subject to racialized laws, customs, and practices both in society at large as well as in the more narrow confines of the music industry.40 such practices affected not only the musicians’ personal and communal lives but also the music itself. white club owners were by and large apathetic to aesthetic concerns. driven by profit motives and operating on the basis of stereotypes of black musicians as mere “entertainers” rather than serious artists, they set up obstacles that free jazz musicians had to overcome in order to develop their music. for instance, in order to maximize alcohol sales, club owners frequently demanded three short performances with small breaks in between.41 such pre-set time frames, calculated for monetary benefits rather than artistic exploration, were ill-suited for the dynamic and open character of the new thing. as noted earlier, free jazz musicians created pieces that neither conformed to the common time frames for a work nor to traditional formal structures—much less to predetermined sets established by club owners. hence, in order to pursue their aesthetic aims, the musicians created the loft movement and performed their music in large loft apartments 36 with no discernable melody to serve as a “grounding point,” rhythmic and sonic textures and densities are foregrounded and in a sense become “thematic,” similar to the way that in a kandinsky painting, line, point, and color are thematized. 37 jost, free jazz, 64. 38 see also bruce ellis benson’s discussion the vulnerability and risk required in musical dialogue in the improvisation of musical dialogue. a phenomenology of music (cambridge: cambridge university press, 2003), 168. 39 for a detailed discussion of the ethical dimensions of gadamer’s hermeneutics, see monica vilhauer, gadamer’s ethics of play. hermeneutics and the other (new york: lexington books, 2010), chapter 5. see also, benson, the improvisation of musical dialogue, chapter 5. 40 see, for example, eric lott, “double v, double-time: bebop’s politics of style,” callaloo, 36 (1988): 597-605, ingrid monson, freedom sounds. civil rights call out to jazz and africa (oxford: oxford university press, 2007), and ekkehard jost, free jazz (new york: de capo press, 1994). 41 john d. baskerville, “free jazz: a reflection of black power ideology,” journal of black studies 24 (1994): 484-497, here 488. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 14 within their own local communities.42 in such a setting, jazz artists could develop their music and let it to carry them for as long as the group collectively agreed. acknowledging music’s socio-political conditioning is consonant with a gadamerian approach to art, as gadamer’s understanding of our historical conditioning, our belonging to various traditions, and our thrownness can be readily applied to the history of american jazz in its multiple expressions. gadamer, no doubt, recognizes how cultural and sociopolitical narratives shape both a societies’ conception of art and its function, as well as how an artist views his or her role in relation to the society.43 these aspects are an important part of the work’s being and meaning, both of which always exceed what is presented or performed at any given time and change with every performance and enactment. art’s dynamic nature and ongoing movement of revealing and concealing go hand in hand with an excess of meaning. davey sums this up nicely with his hermeneutical axiom x = x+, which emphasizes that “words, symbols and images all point beyond themselves. all mean more than initial acquaintance suggests.”44 for example, when a musical work (x) presents itself to an engaged participant, the work also discloses the broader horizons of meaning or speculative fields (x+), which constitute it and give it its significance. the part (x) discloses the whole (x+) but only partially, as the whole (x+) can never be fully captured in images or concepts. as is the case with any dialogical encounter, one must approach the other with a spirit of openness. here free jazz (along with other expressions of modern art) often proves challenging. for example, the intense and often harsh sonic textures and rhythmic densities of free jazz may draw a listener in or repel and frustrate her. the complexity of free jazz, its trans-gressive character, and heightened alterity, places significant demands on the listener, requiring her to spend time with the work in order to learn its “language.” thus, a genuine encounter with free jazz precludes casual listening. one doesn’t listen to free jazz as a way to escape from the mundane, nor does free jazz work well as background or “atmosphere” music. free jazz demands intentional engagement; it asserts itself as a singular, unrepeatable other that simultaneously invites and eludes understanding. gadamer’s hermeneutical aesthetics not only expects but also welcomes interpretative tensions and ambiguities. modern art’s complex alterity requires the listener to slow down, to dwell with the work, and to readjust his or her expectations. we must be fully there with a work in order for any understanding to occur. given our sound-byte world, replete with iphone distractions and interruptions, modern art’s demand for intentional involvement serves as a reminder of what genuine dialogue requires. likewise, the uniqueness of free jazz—its rejection of standard harmonic structures and musical forms—speaks against what gadamer calls the “rule of number” so characteristic of modern life. “the rule of number is visible everywhere and manifests itself above all in the form of the series, aggregate, addition and sequence. […] it is the exchangeability of parts which typifies the sum and series. the fact that an individual part can be exchanged and replaced is an essential component of the kind of life we lead.”45 a free jazz improvisation is a unique event whose very nature resists the “rule of number.” as such it speaks against a consumer culture where objects are mass produced and easily replaced. one does not consume free jazz; one participates in its non-repeatable event. 42 ibid., 489. 43 see, for example, rb, 6–7 [gw8, 97-8]. 44 davey, unfinished worlds, 6. 45 gadamer, rb, 89. [gw8, 321]. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 15 vii. conclusion gadamer understands the artwork not as a static object to be analyzed, but rather as an event in which one actively participates. the work’s dynamic ontology can also be described in terms of its hermeneutic identity, which is always identity constituted by difference. as a communicative event, the artwork has the capacity to speak. that is, the work is an other, whose communally constituted “language” of symbols and sounds, can and does speak meaningfully to those willing to learn its language and hear its address. yet as with any dialogical encounter, a genuine engagement with an artwork results in both clarity and opacity. gadamer’s hermeneutical aesthetics assumes and embraces interpretive tensions; art’s truth is not only a play of revealing and concealing, but it also resists a reductionist propositional “capture” as well as hermeneutical closure. furthermore, participation in art’s event demands an openness and willingness to listen to the work qua other. this comportment can be understood as an ethical commitment, wherein one resolves to be “fully there” with the work even when its language is frustrating and difficult to understand. such attentive dwelling allows the work to come forth, revealing certain aspects and simultaneously concealing others. that is, as one intentionally enters into a back-and-forth play with the work, one comes to understand its message but never with a sense of finality, as if everything has been grasped and no additional meanings could ever surface. given our finitude and the work’s dynamic ontology, this incomplete yet genuine experience of an artwork’s varied meanings and unfinished character is to be expected. here our hermeneutical condition mirrors our human condition. just as one’s self-understanding unfolds over time and in conversation with others, but never reaches final clarity, so too one’s understanding of the work is always incomplete. that our dialogical encounters with others will also be of a both/and, dialectical, and unfolding character is fully compatible with gadamer’s hermeneutical project. on the one hand, when a genuine dialogue occurs, one comes to understand the subject matter better, which is not to say that one must agree with the other. a successful dialogical encounter with a text or a work of art neither requires agreement about nor a complete grasp of the subject matter. as one repeatedly contemplates works over the course of a lifetime, new insights emerge; one comes to see the work, oneself, and the world differently. nonetheless, no single interpretation, nor a combination of interpretations, will ever exhaust the work’s meaning. contra gadamer’s critics, difference is not primarily a problem to solve or overcome. both difference and sameness are equiprimordial. although gadamer does not thematize exploitative and oppressive social relations in which true dialogue is prevented and the goal is simply to eradicate difference, his philosophical project is in no way fundamentally hostile to difference.46 on the contrary, as i have argued, gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics and hermeneutical aesthetics embrace difference and otherness. in its ideal gadamerian expression, one might say that difference dances with sameness in an ongoing interplay where neither takes the lead, but 46 in his discussion of gadamer’s notion of “fusion of horizons,” bernasconi discerns a diminishment and even antagonism to difference. see, for example, bernasconi, “you don’t know what i’m talking about,” 187. nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 16 each tarries together in a community where moves and countermoves are reciprocally recognized, valued, and harmonized in the truest sense. references baskerville, j.d. (1994). free jazz: a reflection of black power ideology. journal of black studies, 24, 484-497. benson, b.e. (2003). the improvisation of musical dialogue: a phenomenology of music. cambridge, ma: cambridge university press. bernasconi, r. (1995). you don’t know what i’m talking about: alterity and the hermeneutical ideal. in l. schmidt (ed.), the specter of relativism, pp. 178-194. evanston, il: northwestern university press. bruns, g.l. (2006). ancients and moderns: gadamer’s aesthetic theory and the poetry of paul celan. in on the anarchy of poetry and philosophy. a guide for the unruly, pp. 33-54. new york, ny: fordham university press. caputo, j.d. (1987). radical hermeneutics. repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. indianapolis, in: indiana university press. davey, n. (2013). unfinished worlds. hermeneutics, aesthetics and gadamer. edinburgh, scotland: edinburgh university press. di cesare, d. (2013). gadamer: a philosophical portrait. bloomington, in: indiana university press. gadamer, h-g. (2007). the artwork in word and image: “so true, so full of being!” in r.e. palmer (ed & trans.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings, pp. 192-224. evanston, il: northwestern university press. gadamer, h-g. (1986). the relevance of the beautiful: art as play, symbol, and festival. in r. bernasconi (ed., n.walker, trans), the relevance of the beautiful and other essays, pp. 3-53. cambridge, ma: cambridge university press. gadamer, h-g. (1993). die aktualität des schönen: kunst als spiel, symbol und fest. in ästhetik und poetik i: kunst als aussage, gesammelte werke band 8. auflage, pp. 94-142. tübingen, germany: j.c.b. mohr (paul siebeck). gadamer, h-g. (1960/2004). truth and method (2nd ed., j. weinsheimer and d. g. marshall, trans & rev.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (1960/2010). hermeneutik i: wahrheit und methode: grundzüge einer philosophischen hermeneutik, gesammelte werke band 1, 4. auflage. tübingen, germany: j.c.b. mohr (paul siebeck). nielsen journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 6 17 habermas, j. (1990). the hermeneutic claim to universality. in g.l. ormiston & a.d. schrift (eds.), the hermeneutic tradition: from ast to ricoeur, pp. 245-272. albany, ny: suny. jost, e. (1994). free jazz. new york, ny: de capo press. lott, e. (1988). double v, double-time: bebop’s politics of style. callaloo, 36, 597-605. marion, j-l. (2002). being given: toward a phenomenology of givenness (1st ed., j. kosky, trans.). stanford, ca: stanford university press. monson, i. (2007). freedom sounds: civil rights call out to jazz and africa. oxford, uk: oxford university press. risser, j. (1997). hermeneutics and the voice of the other. re-reading gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: state university of new york press. tate, d.l. (2012). in the fullness of time: gadamer on the temporal dimension of the work of art. research in phenomenology, 42, 92-113. tate, d.l. (2001). the speechless image. gadamer and the claim of modern painting. philosophy today, 45, 56-68. vilhauer, m. (2010). gadamer’s ethics of play: hermeneutics and the other. new york, ny: lexington books. microsoft word moulesmccaffrey2015.docx 1 university of calgary, faculty of nursing corresponding author: nancy j. moules, rn phd email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 11, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 editorial: catching hermeneutics in the act nancy j. moules1 & graham mccaffrey1 as 2014 came to a close, we sent to publication with peter lang publishers a book manuscript entitled “conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice” (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, in press). as we await publication, we have been reflecting on the very intense, important, and exceedingly difficult work of writing this particular book. we had the privilege of dr. john d. caputo writing a foreword to the book and he offered this remarkable comment saying that the book… catches hermeneutics in the act. it brings home in the most vivid way just what hermeneutics really is – in the concrete. its authors are concretely engaged and hermeneutically enlightened practitioners who are describing the difficult and delicate conditions under which concrete hermeneutical work takes place. (caputo, in moules et al., in press) these are humbling words that could not more clearly elucidate the difficulties that writing the book held – it was difficult and delicate work and, at times, it was wordless work, a challenge when you are trying to write a book! catching something is tricky business and especially tricky if what you are after is the exact opposite. we did not want to catch and entrap hermeneutics as a research “method” – we wanted to catch it “in the act” of the world – in the ways it allows things to act and exposes the action that is often just “lost to the work of simply getting by” (wallace, 1987, p. 12). caputo’s words go to the heart of the enterprise of applied hermeneutics and are an encouraging reminder of the newness and excitement of what that represents. caputo, as well as dr. richard kearney and dr. nicholas davey, have come to the annual canadian hermeneutic institute to share their expertise as hermeneutic philosophers, steeped in a long and profound tradition. in each case, they have told us that they approached the invitation with curiosity as to what scholars and practitioners in practice professions both wanted to hear from them, and what we could have to add to that tradition. each time, they have shared their knowledge, ideas, and thinking with moules & mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 1 2 exceptional generosity and they have “got it” – they have quickly seen that the interpretation of human encounters in the context of practice professions is as much a fit object for hermeneutic study as an artwork, a poem, or a religious text. having a glimpse of applied hermeneutics through the eyes of philosophical experts is at the same time gratifying and a stimulating reminder that we are working fresh ground, and it behooves us to keep working to be as exacting as we can about what we do. it is in this spirit that it felt timely to undertake to describe the work-in-progress that is applied hermeneutics in the fleshed-out form of a book. we proposed the book because we believed that something had to be articulated about how hermeneutics, particularly gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics (1960/1989), had something to say to practice professions about a way to approach research around human concerns. four academics (three nurses and one educator) endeavored then to find language that was “concrete” enough to be understood but did not fall into the trap of offering a prescribed method of conducting hermeneutic research. in chapter four of the book, we took up this issue of method as, rather than a set prescription, it is instead an act of being methodical and following leads. in his foreword, caputo reminds us of the etymological meaning of method: meta as making one’s way along a particular path (odos). gadamer (2007) suggested that “understanding is an adventure, and like any other adventure, is dangerous” (p. 243), but, in this book, we tried to suggest that understanding is the ultimate hermeneutic wager: that understanding matters and will make a difference in matters of human consequence of living well in conditions where suffering often exists. we tried to offer a prompt to conduct research that touches on human conditions of living: illness, schools, children, health, relationships, suffering, healing, and hope. this was hard work. balancing a description of how to conduct something without offering a map, guide, baton, or train engine conductor cap is challenging. in many ways, the work of hermeneutics as a research approach is somewhat intuitive, but we also believe it is something that can be taught, learned, and definitely practiced. writing the chapter about conducting interviews was an act of trying to capture the complexity, contingency, and fluidity of the interview. it is deeply responsive as is hermeneutics. there is no guide for an interview, no prior questions determined that will protect one from what is going to come in the interview. it is like describing art – here is how it appears right here and now, but if you turn to look at it from another angle or through another eye, its meaning changes. conducting an interview in a responsive mode requires tact, discretion, discernment, and skill. it requires a turn of head and turn of eye and ear. it is not easy to do and even harder to describe or teach. the chapter on analysis stopped us in our tracks. we know what we do when we are into the deep work of interpretation and we so often talk with students about how to begin this deep and involved work. interpretation is skilled, complex, and exciting work. to find language, though, to describe this practice was very difficult. we needed language that was at once concrete and yet complex. hermeneutic analysis (i.e., interpretation) is not easy; we could not sell it off as such, however we had to present it as something that is “doable” and something that can be learned and practiced. data analysis, like so much in hermeneutics, is most purely caught on the wing, in the intense back and forth of making sense of particular human situations. beneath the dry research terminology of data, are the stories, memories, thoughts, and feelings of people often recalling momoules & mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 1 3 ments of extremity in their lives. we bear a responsibility to hold those data and make good use of them, transforming them without traducing them, in our interpretations. that is the ethical heart of hermeneutic work. approaching the chapter on rigor and integrity of hermeneutic research felt like a revisiting of every proposal we have ever written, every presentation to scientists, or die-hard quantitative researchers, and a recalling of trying to defend something without being defensive (see for e.g., moules, jardine, mccaffrey, & brown, 2013). writing it, finding the words though, despite the difficulty, proved to be particularly affirming. we were not simply arguing for the rigor but really seeing it and, for once, actually believing in it with a conviction we had been shy about before. the same happened in the “so what” chapter – the understandable demand that the work matters and addresses what is at stake. what surprised us was the discovery that what is really at stake in this work is that it compels us to live in the world differently: the knowledge of knowledge compels. it compels us to adopt an attitude of permanent vigilance against the temptation of certainty. it compels us to recognize that certainty is not a proof of truth. it compels us to realize that the world everyone sees is not the world but a world we bring forth with others. it compels us to see that the world will be different only if we live differently. it compels us because, when we know that we know, we cannot deny (to ourselves or to others) that we know…(this) implies an ethics that we cannot evade…an ethics that springs from human reflection and puts human reflection right at the core as a constitutive social phenomenon. (maturana & varela, 1992, p. 245) the “so what” of hermeneutic research is inherently a social endeavor. though questions that guide hermeneutic research are vitally important, no less important is to answer these questions tentatively, openly, and with the hermeneutic humility that recognizes that no one question can be answered definitively once and for all. rather, hermeneutics “concentrates on the question of what happens to us when we ‘understand’” (davey, 2006, p. xi). hermeneutics compels us as researchers and users of research to live in the world differently, to realize that understanding is not, as davey (2006) invoked, just about interpreting the world but also about changing it. (moules et al., in press) hermeneutic questions are hard questions; hermeneutic understanding is hard understanding. yet, at the heart of it is the capacity to know and live differentlyto find language that works. we believe this book will make a contribution to our practices but we also believe it made a difference to our thinking and what is yet to come. applied hermeneutics, hermeneutics as a way of conducting research, is in one sense well established – there are many published studies, there are variant approaches in the literature (to which this book makes a substantial contribution), but set against the centuries-old traditions of interpretation of religious texts, or the philosophical development of hermeneutics it is still a new adventure. each publication in a practice discipline that stakes a claim as hermeneutic is still perceptibly defining the field. there is a degree of exposure in this – we have encountered scholars in the humanities who look askance at our travails in the world of hermeneutics, just as we are familiar with the objections of those who fetishize the scientific method in our own disciplines. it is only a hermeneutic truism, however, to say that there is more to learn, more to be done, and that even as we have tried to articulate how far we have come, the way ahead lies open. moules & mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 1 4 in this book, we strived to conserve the human conditions and sensitivities of our topics and, according to caputo, we offered “what the philosophers call the ‘hermeneutic situation’ in the concrete, glowing white hot and jumping off the pages of the philosophy books” (caputo, in moules et al., in press). references caputo, j.d. (in press). foreword: the wisdom on hermeneutics. in n.j. moules, g. mccaffrey, j.c. field, & c.m. laing, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. new york, ny: suny. gadamer, h-g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev.ed., j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.) new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h-g. (2007). the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (r. palmer, ed. & trans). evanston, il: northwestern university press. maturana, h.r., & varela, f. (1992). the tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding (rev. ed.). boston, ma: shambhala. moules, n.j., jardine, d.w., mccaffrey, g., & brown, c.b. (2013). “isn’t all oncology hermeneutic?”. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 3. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5w95141 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (in press). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. wallace, b. (1987). appeal. in the stubborn particulars of grace. toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. microsoft word gilhamfinal.docx corresponding author: christopher m. gilham email: cmgilham@hotmail.com journal of applied hermeneutics february 9, 2012 the author(s) 2012 the privileges chart in a behaviour class: seeing the power and complexity of dominant traditions and unconcealing trust as basic to pedagogical relationships christopher m. gilham abstract through an anecdote, this interpretive work suggests that a chart on student privileges in a class for students with behavioural challenges led to an understanding of dominant traditions at play and the power such traditions can hold over educators. these complexly intertwined traditions included the efficiency movement, the norm, and market capitalism’s emphasis on personal rights. these traditions set the conditions for an abused and exclusive notion of privileges for particular students. this led the teacher and me to question of who decides student rights and for whom do such rights apply. we were then able to talk about how the teacher came to understand his students through pedagogical relationships built on trust rather than a singular belief in the rights of each student. this paper also attempts to show the above understandings involved an investigative labouring to dialogue with the topic and that such effort is worth-while because we were able to return to or recover some ‘basics’ within pedagogical relationships. keywords behaviour, discourse, interpretation, pedagogy, rights, special education, tradition, trust, all things are full of labour; man cannot utter it: the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing. ecclesiastes 1: 8 (king james version) the anecdote jakob was hurting others regularly. he was a grade 6 student in a designated classroom for students with severe social and emotional disabilities. the school had asked me to come in to help strategize because they felt his behaviours were too severe even for a setting designed to assist such children. soon after receiving the request for support, i met with the principal, assistant principal, resource teacher, and classroom teacher at the school. i arrived early, purposively. classrooms provide their own artifacts of a culture or evidence of how life might be for students who inhabit them, i believe. before everyone was present for the meeting, i walked out of the resource teacher’s office and headed down the hallway… the students are not here at this time as i gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 2 enter the room. it feels large for a class of eight students. several small windows allow just enough light in so the classroom lights can remain off. there is a large carpet, a comfortable reading chair, about ten separated student desks facing a cobra-like head of a smartboard projector and screen at the front of the room. there are bulletin boards on the walls of the classroom. i walk clockwise through the room, scanning the environment quickly. a large light green poster board sits on the fourth wall of my scan. it looks like a chart. i get closer to read the large dark text of the title: ‘loss of privileges’ oh no. i read more… 1) the privilege to eat lunch with peers will be lost for misbehavior. 2) the privilege to have recess will be lost for misbehavior. i am stuck. i feel despair and anger together. there is more on the list. this is enough though. i am captured as i have been captured so many times these past few years. it is not the first time i have seen similar kinds of ominous and universal warnings framed as special favors or advantages for special children. in this moment of being pulled up short and disappointed, a flood of thoughts arise. the privileges chart says to me that children in this room have behaviours which are to be pre-empted against with stern warnings of what may come. because of their exceptional status, they alone are ‘privileged’ for what would be in other cases with other students everyday occurrences like eating lunch with others. i see a structure that drips of exclusionary relations within a school community. i do not know how to reconcile the general term ‘misbehaviour’ with the specific ‘privileges’ of eating lunch with others or going out for recess. i wonder how we justify treating the difference labeled as ‘behavioural challenge or disability’ so universally and unjustly different than the rest of the students in the school? also, i want to know if eating together and playing outside are considered privileges in any official educational documentation in the province. i don’t know how pedagogical relationships can develop between students and teachers when threats like those of the chart are disconnected from the particular lives of complex children and their everyday occurrences. i struggle to hold a calm face. i want to tell the teacher this chart acts as a warning that most likely exacerbates the challenges this classroom is supposed to be positively supporting. over the past few years, charts like this have evoked an overall guiding question in my work in schools: is this what we ought to do about students identified as having severe social and emotional disabilities? i contain the emotional response of the immediate experience. i know it is a moment to be captured in writing. i need to wrestle with it, attempt to articulate it, take the time to reflect on it, open it up and expose it for myself and for others. i immediately decide i will do this. the nod part 1: an opening several days later i met with the school team again. i remember my mind was full of many of the thoughts above racing about trying to come forth clearly. at the same time, i tried to be tactful and to apply the right words at the right time in the right way. i had been thinking about positions i have been reading within gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 3 the field of disability studies in education (baglieri, valle, connor, & gallagher, 2010; ralston & ho, 2010; skrtic, 1995; thomas & loxley, 2007; valle & connor, 2011) and how this field arose in response to the negative pathology of traditional special education that often focuses mainly on the person of disability exclusively. disability studies provides a counterbalance to the deficit-based understanding of disability that permeates education. it is an interdisciplinary field in which disability is studied as a marker of identity–like race, ethnicity, class, gender, and sexual orientation. disability is viewed primarily through a social lens, as a series of historical, cultural, and social responses to human difference... disability studies focuses on social relationships among people and the interpretation of human difference. (valle & connor, 2011, p. xi) recently, i have attempted to be more mindful of the pathological focus dominating special education in alberta. disability studies and hermeneutics have provided me with different ways of approaching my work with educators and students. in this second school meeting, we were once again discussing jakob and how we could best support him in the school. an opportunity arose for me to share my thoughts on the privileges chart. “because i care about this new relationship with you and the work we do, i want to tell you about something i saw in the classroom that really bothered me.” “shoot away. we want you to tell us what you see here.” “i’m not a fan of talk about privileges. i think it’s important to talk to students about their rights and the responsibilities that come with having those rights. if i were a parent of a child in the behaviour class, i would want to know why my child has privileges that probably the rest of the students in the school have as rights. what is it about my child that gives you reason to treat him as without certain given rights all the time?” to my surprise, heads nodded in approval immediately. it was as if i had hit on an idea they felt was just. a new space had been created for us to explore, discuss, and perhaps to come to an understanding. i believed i could now begin to ask the teacher what was at play with the posting of this privileges chart. later, i realized my thoughts about rights needed critical reflection too. privileges (from the latin meaning ‘individual law’) are defined as special rights, favours, advantages, or exemptions to particular individuals or groups (oxford online dictionary, 2012). hence, privileges are part of the rights discourse. in evoking student rights, i initially did not realize their connectedness to privileges. our western exaltation of rights as individual and inalienable can lead to an isolating subjectivism. one is able to hold whatever opinion or position they like without the ability of anyone else being able to offer arguments for or against others opinions (jardine, friesen, & clifford, 2006). this can have pernicious consequences; as a parent i could argue my child must have lunch and recess with others regardless of her actions. certainly, there would be times where it is unwise and unhelpful for some students to be with their peers. evoking children’s inalienable rights could be a barrier to considering what is best for her and the community of students she lives within. this was not what i wanted the school team to believe was my position on the privileges chart. the rights discourse can lead to a distorted and self-enclosed subjectivity devoid of gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 4 any ability to make truth claims (jardine et al., 2006). this self-enclosed state of individuals perpetuates an idea of freedom not capable of being accountable to others. david smith (2011) wrote of the gradual morphing of medieval christendom’s seven deadly sins into “…the easier virtues of contemporary capitalism (self-righteous rage against another in the name of personal rights…” (p.154). therefore, it is virtuous to act in defense of one’s rights even if it acts to push the defender further from his or her community. likewise, in the excess framing of the individual’s rights wise judgment on behalf of a community can be sacrificed. a personal or individual reign of rights is the measure of freedom. smith argued this same glorification of rights works at cultural and national levels. in the united states, this collective belief in inalienable individual rights has created a government that believes it can tell the world how to be free. professional authority also gets lost in the realm of opinion and rights (smith, p. 157). given this understanding of rights, i could more justly ask if the use of privileges in this classroom was best for this community of identified ‘behaviour kids.’ further labouring was needed. within the school board’s regulation 6001 on student discipline (cbe, 2008), principals can remove privileges from students on a short-term basis. however, mention is not made anywhere of examples of privileges nor is it defined in the first section of the document where terms are defined. i could not find any mention of similar privileges in the school act. in alberta education’s current three-part document titled supporting positive behaviour in alberta’s schools (2008), references to privileges are almost universally meant as extra or additional benefits used to proactively create positive relations between students and schools. some examples of privileges are given in these documents which do evince the ‘extra special’ nature of the rights given: “activities or privileges such as playing a game, sitting in a special place in the class, drawing, writing, colouring, going to recess or gym early, having extra computer time” (p. 62) and “tokens may be ‘cashed-in’ for ‘back-up’ reinforcers such as food, objects, activities or special privileges” (p. 65). then i found this: “a formal contract can be used to require a student to either demonstrate positive behaviour or face a negative consequence such as the loss of privileges (e.g., participating in lunchroom programs or extracurricular activities)” (p. 55). intertwined discourses of economic, legal, and behavioural traditions confronts us immediately through ‘formal contracts’ and token systems that can be ‘cashed-in.’ we can see through this current and official alberta education document that the privileges chart did not come to exist ex nihilo. a historically present and guiding mega discourse exemplifies this use of privileges thereby giving authority to their continued use. important questions were now howling at me. how did participating in lunchroom activities like eating lunch with others or going outside for recess become privileges? is it the case that we live in an educational system where doing something different at lunch than eating alone at a desk in a room is a privilege? what systems of student control and efficiency were at work here? what vestiges of an earlier mode of schooling children still runs deep in our modern system? generally, when rights for others are privileges to some we most often think of those who have lost those rights through a violation of the law, like criminals. it would be more natural to find a privileges chart in a jail where inmates have been found guilty of violating laws and therefore have had their rights suspended. for them, privileges are most often earned for more law-like behaviours while in jail. similarly, this classroom artifact appears to work prior to the violation of the law gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 5 by placing these particular students into an assumed prior status of guilt that has been given special dispensation via privilege to engage in what most would see as everyday healthy situations for and among children. in other words, the behaviour students’ behaviours will not be tolerated in the least. there has been an acceleration of control over these students in anticipation of the law-breaking behaviours the students will get into, assumedly. in the context of the education document referenced above, the formal contract was meant to be used when students presented with challenging behaviours. hence, it does not seem mere conjecture to state that students with behavioural issues can be given status akin to prisoners who are guilty with special privileges to be removed at the first violation of the school laws. if the status and chart or formal contract could only prevent such anticipated extremes all would be well; after all, who would want to lose the specially earned status--a status assigned by a pathological discourse of abnormality--of no longer being able to eat with peers or play outside at recess? a colleague in special education consulting would often tell others how he had ‘earned’ over fifty such ‘formal contracts’ in his years at school, all of them working to push him away from school rather than inspire or motivate to keep him in our formal places of learning. the contract and privileges chart speak of a power attempting to control students not understand or converse with them. what is communicated to only these kinds of labeled and constituted students with such tools in a hyper focused seemingly positively appointed way is that if you misbehave we will be quick to take you away from your peers. i suggest the very conditions of play and socializing that some ‘behaviour children’ need most is the very thing we hold above them waiting to be removed. such threatening signs can stranglehold hope for those used to living in schools and homes in often-hopeless ways. this artifact presents without goodwill towards those particular children. the privileges chart demands of us to ask rights and privileges written by whom and for whom? when set out into the educational world, the enactors of such regulations, best practices, and strategies must be interrogated. the rights discourse can be very powerfully held as an exclusion making or community dividing tool and this requires our vigilance. back at the second meeting, the teacher excitedly replied, “yes! i think so too. we had someone from the school board here last year telling us this was the way to do things so i was following that. but i completely agree with you.” it looked as though when he said that a tremendous emotional release occurred. more of the play of this teacher’s life in the classroom was coming forth. i felt an urgency to meet with him so we could explore how and why he followed the advice to post the privileges chart. in that moment of his emotional release, it also appeared as if he had an immediate recognition of the importance of what was said. this was a moment of having caught or re-captured an insight or knowledge or perhaps even wisdom held ready to burst forth like those delicately exciting and intensely memorable moments that happen between students and teachers in their acts of learning together: the rest of the children in the class caught alex's excitement. a space had opened and questions rushed in. just how many ways were there to make five? what if you were not limited to ones and twos? we were in, and the glances between us told the tale. as daniel (grade 4) once said about a similar moment in the classroom, “i can always tell we've hit something because you two [sharon and pat] look at each other in that way. (jardine, friesen, & clifford, 2008, p. 124) gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 6 we looked at each other that way in the meeting. in our nod of excitement, an understanding was brought to the surface again. surprisingly, this surfacing seemed so easily come by. as i laboured over this phenomenon, i began to wonder if perhaps this timely catch of what was thrown happened because life in the classroom for jakob and his peers was not well. life in the classroom was not working out as the teacher and the school administrative team had hoped. i was reminded of heidegger’s (1962) notion of the everydayness of things, like his example of the hammer“we do not ask what a hammer is for rather, we demand in certain moments to have the hammer. the hammer’s function is already understood, taken for granted, effective” (pp. 109 115). as wrathall (2011) noted of heidegger’s work on the concealing and revealing nature of truth, “...the style of being that allows things to show up as having an essence is most invisible when it is most effective, for example, we are captivated by things we are wholly absorbed in our dealing with them. that renders us unable to make ourselves aware of the understanding of being that is shaping our experience of the world” (p. 33). when the hammer breaks, one begins to notice the hammer and that which is hammered differently. intentionality arises to discover more or differently in order to work with that which was being hammered. the privilege chart as ‘hammer’ had broken. with the school team, there was a greater intentionality and openness to seeing possibilities or to seeing anew. maybe this openness had nothing to do with the privileges chart. maybe it was enough to have a strategist with them giving them advice for their time of crisis. for the school team, there was ripeness for possibility and renewal as a result of being pulled up short by the severity of the behaviours jakob displayed, i suggest. the nod came about for us easily. a kinship then emerged, a famil(y) iar sense of having been here before in our lives. i think we recognized from our past experiences as educators that progress in a kind of technical know-how for troubled youth–that know-how evidenced in the artifact–was not attained or achieved as a form of competency or mastery or as an objective and clear method to be applied. students often act beyond the wanting and doing (gadamer, 1975) of our attempts to control and predict their behaviour especially when we attempt to do so through a hyper structure like the privileges chart. perhaps we realized the chart was actually like a raised hammer ready to strike and this was the wrong way to support students. perhaps we knew this about the chart and the timing of this anecdote finally brought it to the open and stated it when the words could be heard by all of us. i was starting to understand the latter may have been at play. this was an unconcealing of the barrier-like, and disempowering play of, traditional discourses. our nods of approval demanded more from me. it was not enough to let my sharing and our collective sigh act as the final word. my interpretation of the chart and the events needed to be shared with the teacher. we needed to do some work within this experience. we needed to labour interpretively to bring this forth well. something had been noticed or nodded to; it was worthwhile to hold onto, pursue, and find ourselves more deeply immersed in it. what i needed to do was begin talking to the teacher about this nod and to explore the play of that artifact in the context of his life with those students in the classroom and school. hence, the nod was a return to conversation, dialogue, and ongoing understanding. we had once again come back to an original difficulty. this difficulty is to suffer through complex work with children in crisis. this whiling away (jardine et al., 2008, p. 223) with the experience–taking the time to gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 7 reflect on it and explore it–and this recognition that there was something important, something worth-while to dwell within, connected me to the topography of the efficiency movement led by frederick winslow taylor (friesen, jardine, & clifford, 2009; jardine et al., 2006, 2008; valle & connor, 2011). the privileges chart shared a similar tone to his important, society changing work less than 100 years ago: every day, year in and year out, each man should ask himself over and over again, two questions,” said taylor in his standard lecture. “first, ‘what is the name of the man i am now working for?’ and having answered this definitely then ‘what does this man want me to do, right now?’ not, ‘what ought i to do in the interests of the company i am working for?’ not, ‘what are the duties of the position i am filling?’ not, ‘what did i agree to do when i came here?’ not, ‘what should i do for my own best interest?’ but plainly and simply, ‘what does this man want me to do?’ (boyle, 2006, cited in friesen et al., 2009, pp. 151-152) clearly the voice of the artifact in the classroom wanted the students to behave well or to put it in the way it was written, to not misbehave or to do what they were told to do without question. this interpretive connection needed further investigation because the teacher also hinted at his discomfort with this way of controlling children. in the past 6 years, i have been in hundreds of classrooms supporting educators. i have been witness to an absorption into that which makes our work efficient, stems the flow of challenge and difficulty and ambiguity in learning. like the privilege chart demands, prior to behaving, a student must be aware that certain behaviours will be punished. therefore, we must make life easier for us all by making sure students do not behave in certain ways regardless of what needs might be communicated for example rest, or food, or time away from school work. there is the curriculum to get through, the lesson to be taught, seats to be sat in, and lines to stand straight within. the chart says, ‘this is what will get them into position for learning.’ yet the howling against such a method grows in numbers. i have seen this change over the years. complex students like these and the crisis educators find themselves in despair at what once captivated us, concealed from us a more basic (jardine et al., 2008) way of being with one another in learning. more and more of the teachers i meet in classrooms understand that children do not need universal laws imposed on them or reward and token systems to shape them. in jardine’s back to the basics (2008) we are provocatively asked to: imagine if treated these things as “the basics” of teaching and learning: relation, ancestry, commitment, participation, interdependence, belonging, desire, conversation, memory, place, topography, tradition, inheritance, experience, identity, difference, renewal, generativity, intergenerationality, discipline, care, strengthening, attention, devotion, transformation, character. (p. xi) as i will attempt to reveal, this teacher has imagined and lived in this kind of a basic way with his students and had to suffer through the power of these traditions held over him. there are also many in education who are attempting to hunt down this recent howling for the marginalized and overly fragmented student population with a renewed vigor for certain knowledge, especially in special education (gallagher, 1998; kauffman & sasso, 2006). some argue that we need to re-impose standards of verifiable, effective and, hence objective, practices if we wish to have special gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 8 education students succeed in schools (cook, landrum, tankersley, & kauffman, 2003; kauffman, crockett, gerber, & landrum, 2007). they argue that if only educators could follow the proper methods we could get things right for students. over the years, i have seen tools like the privileges chart cover up the deeper problems constitutive of special education like the glorification of mental measurement and pathological diagnosis as truths, as a discourse which venerates the normal (dudley-marling & gurn, 2010; foucault, 1977, 1999; skrtic, 1995; thomas & loxley, 2007; valle & connor, 2011). for example, i am constantly witness to teams of school psychologists spending their work time almost exclusively doing social-emotional and cognitive assessments so that school administrators can attach alberta special education coding status to students resulting in increased funding for the school and supports for the students now codified. the very system created to support students has resulted in its own army of expert mental measurers who could be directly supporting students in need but instead must spend their time churning out ‘ab-normal’ codification documents to meet the criteria for coding which in turn provides the primary funding for their employment, as well. it is a vicious cycle of production and consumption based on a notion of difference residing at two extremes of a constructed curve of population. the policy structure of special education in alberta glorifies these measured, expert truths as the truth of children who are not normal (alberta, 2010). the pathological approach reigns in special education. it is not that there is no truth in the psycho-educational pathology of children. the concern is with what this pathology conceals or hides in its dominance. the normal curve fragments communities into a binary of normal and abnormal. the abnormal are then further fragmented into smaller bits of diagnostic labels and categorized streams of cognitive and social–emotional abilities. there is an ever-increasing coding structure (winzer, 2009) ready to frame children in particular kinds of ways. in the attempt to capture freedom as everyone with their own unique and individual, right-given ways, we have created a diversity monster based on a normal curve created and defined in modern historical contexts (danforth, 2009; dudley-marling & gurn; thomas & loxley; valle & connor). with school psychologists, the production line has been removed or cut off from supporting students directly. echoes of the automotive line rush forth. some workers never see the product they co-construct in its fullness, complexity, and wholeness because in their tightly defined tasks those workers can only do what they are told to do. this policy driven dominant approach within the machinery of supporting and educating the ‘special’ or ‘exceptional’ is not working as evidenced by low high school completion rates (alberta, 2009) for severely coded students. i returned to the school two weeks later for yet another meeting. i entered the classroom and the loss of privileges sign was nowhere to be seen. in its place, was a sign telling students which activity centers they could go to when their work was completed. there were other new ‘signs’ about the room too. these signs spoke of kindness and caring and student engagement in learning. the teacher approached as i looked closely at these new signs. i hope you don’t mind me saying this. it warms my heart to see such renewal and hope in your classroom. i’m so glad that loss of privileges sign is gone. he smiled back and replied with enthusiasm, gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 9 i inherited that sign. i took it on because people told me to do so. your thoughts at the last meeting reminded me that there are many things i know to be true about this work that i had forgotten or felt i had to put aside. the nod – part 2: true conversation i sought ethics approval from the school board to interview the classroom teacher. one of my hopes with this writing was to more thoroughly clear the way so the teacher and i could interpret the experience together, to appreciate it more fully in its abundance. the event and this subsequent intentional act of research or explication through dialogue are pedagogic and thus fitting as hermeneutic. a hermeneutic notion of understanding is centered on the dispossession of understanding from its methodical, prepared self-security. it returns inquiry in education to the original, serious, and difficult interpretive play in which we live our lives together with children; it returns inquiry to the need and possibility of true conversation. (jardine, 1992, p. 124) as true conversation, i wanted to explore these questions: 1) what does the experience say to us about what we ought to do for students we have categorized in a particular kind of way? 2) what gets opened up or revealed via a description of the event and a conversation with an educator from within the event? prior to discussing the experience with the teacher, i asked him to read the above writing. i framed the writing as anecdotal, as a piece of short narrative intended to bring forth a particular thought or point clearly (pinar, 1995, pp. 438-439). this anecdote was intended to be an act of clearing the way in order to allow us to make sense of the particular experience, as if to say, ‘we got it and here’s what we think was at play’ (van manen, 1990, p. 204). this act of talking and writing about the experience and its complex connections is, in itself, a part of the interpretive, hermeneutic process. coming to an understanding includes me, the teacher and this writing, and the texts i have read and bring to the conversation. in this way, there is a field of knowledge we are in and explore (friesen et al., 2009). in this exploration, it is our ability to get into some of the thickness of the field, to dig our way around the thickets and needles, to stay together as we struggle towards an understanding, towards a mutual nod of recognition that makes this journey both worthwhile and ongoing. the chart was like a warning sign on a trailhead capable of stopping many in their tracks and turning them back to the comfort of what they had come from. for us, the sign demanded we take the risks inherent within the difficulty of this work. jakob demanded this. students in behaviour classes demand this. it is our responsibility to ask what is just about our work. these images of struggling in a dense and complex field to understand what we are immersed and absorbed in for the purpose of moving about well with one another is why interpretive work matters (jardine et al., 2006). through such a journey, i hoped the way would be further cleared for us to talk about possibilities as a shared hope through a renewed understanding of what we ought to do for students in our care. i hoped for the pedagogical act described as “fielding knowledge” (friesen et al., 2009, p. 156): within the apparently singular anecdote may lay a complex history–a field of knowledge–for us to explore. this singular case is not to be racked up as another example along a line of examples to make a statistically significant signifigilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 10 cance. the richness explored enlivens its ties to a greater topography, a greater field. we continued this conversation through a reading of the anecdote. once the teacher had read the anecdote, he replied quickly: …the privileges and loss of privileges is probably the thing that struck me most as being obviously something that i didn’t want to do in the beginning and it was highly recommended…and my instinct kicked in and said well, why didn’t i trust that, at least part way through last year?...i think it also harkens back to a lot of the things that were suggested to me last year when i began in this position; i think things that i don’t do anymore and i wouldn’t do and go against who i am as a teacher…also when i read this i thought “oh. what about all the good things i’m doing here?” i’m often criticized for being too soft and too sensitive and too ‘bleeding heart’ all the time…it’s been described to me that, “you need to be a police officer in certain cases with certain kids in certain times, not all the time.” the anecdote served its initial purpose, it seemed. the teacher felt the emotional heaviness of recognizing (re-cognition) the privileges chart anew. he had been teaching in ‘regular’ school classrooms for several years before entering this special education classroom. once there, he found that his wisdom gained through experiences had over the years was not supported. at this point, i realized more fully how his initial nod in the second meeting was a nod of recognition and release. the space was now cleared for further explication of what was at play in that classroom for him and the students and he began to share that play in our conversation. also, the anecdote revealed its limitations in what it conceals as a tool. as i visited this classroom more frequently, i realized the teacher does not live with his students in any way reflective or indicative of what the inherited artifact pointed towards. could this have been because i was present? in conversations with several other key people close to the teacher, they all shared that he had a cogenerative, community-building approach with the students in the class. still the inherited notion of the artifact was tied closely to the direction from ‘expert’ and ‘experienced’ others that he be like a police officer from time to time in his work with these students. what was inferred in this professional pressure? i asked him. unfortunately i know, i’m pretty sure it means, ‘you’re wrong and you need to do what i say and you have no choice’ in speaking to a child…i think they are also trying to convey that the child needs to know that you are in charge, you are in control…i would take a very different approach. i shared my burgeoning historical understanding of the dominant discourses i believed were at play. he replied: when you talk about the artifact being 'a taken for granted tradition' i'm reminded of how i incessantly questioned everything that was suggested (from worksheets on anger management to the loss of privileges sign) at the beginning and how much time people spent trying to convince me that working with 'these kids' was different and much of what i needed to do would be counter-intuitive. had i listened to my own intuitive wisdom i wouldn't have had any support because 'those in the know' would have shrugged helplessly, saying i didn't follow the advice given to me so why bother. my ideas of working with these kids were seen as naive and overly opgilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 11 timistic. i was so deep in self-doubt that it took a lot to resurface. although for some teachers the chart may be taken for granted as typical practice, this teacher felt otherwise because of his previous experiences teaching in ‘regular’ classrooms. yet the chart remained posted. he shared a feeling of being unsupported if he did not use the chart and therefore pressured or imposed upon despite his learned experience. doubt then crept in on him. since he began teaching in this class over a year and a half ago, he has often been ill. could the imposition of the chart as an overall approach to working with this fragmented and boxed-in population of psycho-educationally determined abnormality produce sickness in a teacher who does not wish to be this way with his students? not only was it suggested the teacher be more powerful over the children in his care contrary to what he believed he needed to be and do with students, he felt a similar exercise of power surrounded him in his new position. for a time, the teacher felt powerless to trust his own sense of what was just and caring for students. surfacing is an older, deeper controlling power over self and others in education. this truth came to light for us once again as if coming out of the long, deep shadow of a rational, technical age of school efficiency, the behavioural sciences, and a twisted logic within market capitalism that honours individual rights above and beyond community (friesen et al., 2009; jardine et al., 2010; smith, 2011). the power of this shadow in this context is not necessarily an intentional one, bent on ruining lives and subjugating others. in these long and varied travels, we have come to know something of narration sickness, and how a once enthusiastic tale of the ways of schools has become everincreasingly, nauseatingly numbing. we have been intimately involved with hundreds of teachers and students (as i have too) and have witnessed, first hand, an old tale, which was once full of enthusiasm, still holding sway; a tale of fragmentation, breakdown, linearity, and literalism, coupled with regimes of surveillance, management and its requisite standardization of assessment, and all the consequent sicknesses. students have become ill, dull, disinterested in the face of this tale. teachers, too, have become ill. and what is taken to be ‘learning’ has itself fallen pallid and weak, infected with a industrial assembly-line story-line that has trumped its own living ways. perhaps even more insidious is how the (often silent) dominance of this story-line allows for the assignation of blame for such ills on the sufferers themselves. (friesen et al., 2009, p. 149) (italics added) a pivotal leading figure in this movement was frederick winslow taylor, author of the scientific principles of management (1911). an industrialist, turned author and educational consultant for the us government, his work with industry and education on efficiency standards and practices became a cultural benchmark for what ought to be done in society (friesen et al., 2009; pinar, 1995; valle & connor, 2011). taylor was after efficient production at the cost of intelligent, thinking workers. what mattered was the precise and timely application of very specific skills or tasks in order to keep lines of production moving well. compliance was all that was needed. the idea that students should be doing exactly what we ask them to do and that educators should do the same is therefore not new. it is part of a historico-cultural tradition still numbing both students and teachers. i suggest this inheritance in education often exacerbates and amplifies oppositional behaviours in many students. in a recent discussion with gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 12 junior high school staff on the topic of oppositional behaviours, i asked a simple question: “if you were told all day by most of the adults in this building what you were to do and how you were to do it, how would you feel and respond? now imagine that as your overall, totalizing experience in schools or at work.” staff responses more than strongly indicated this was not acceptable. in their responses to the question, some staff seemed oppositional. i pointed this out to an ironic, fading laughter. “so why then,” i continued to ask, “do we think it is ok to do this to students, especially those we know are sensitive to this kind of control and telling?” unsaid was the answer i often run into, head-on, in schools: “because they need to respect our authority.” so it is that we stop at such statements, equivalent in every way to phrases like, “it is what it is”, and “this is the real world here.” here we have the taken for granted as simply the way things are. (friesen et al., 2009) in the face of such ominous dulling of the life and choices of students and educators, is it surprising to find behaviour classes filled with students who despise schools and teachers who no longer want to teach in them? when i met with the teacher and shared this writing, i told him i was worried about opening up a connection between his sickness and this historically situated ‘narrative sickness.’ he replied, no. this is ok. you would be right to bring this out in the writing like you have. this is true. it is true of me and the students. actually, thank you for this. since we began this conversation i’ve felt much better. when i first started i walked in here fresh and did not know what i was entering into so i sought help. i read. i stayed up many nights doing my own research thinking it through, talking it through with my sister and friends, thinking, ‘what could this mean?’ because i’m sort of a big picture person, i need to know what’s going on, where i need to go, what it all means…i had no training so from those people who had been in this area much longer than me giving me advice. the loss of privileges chart almost seemed like a structure. it almost seemed like something i was meant to have other things flow from and that was even explained to me before many other things i believe to be important to be thinking and understanding and doing. i felt like i had been patted on the head and told, “don’t worry dear. this is all you need to do. these kids aren’t going to make a lot progress. don’t worry about it.” that was said to me in a meeting last year and i just felt literally crazy, i felt actually crazy. i don’t even know what, this was no longer a teaching job… and people could say as much as they wanted to, “stop thinking about it” but i don’t think that was enough to sit back and think, “ah well. i’ll just sit back and deal with that tomorrow.” history tells the story of a long-standing tradition of viewing students like those in this teacher’s classroom in terms often synonymous with ‘badness’ and disrepute; vagrants, delinquents, waifs and strays, ragged urchins, guttersnipes, blackguards, reprobates, street arabs, incorrigibles, for examples (winzer, 2009). these were educational terms used to describe what we now label children and youth as having ‘social and emotional disabilities.’ the behavioural sciences are designed to intentionally prevent or remedy that which is out of the norm and in the subject: the abnormal or ‘dis’-abled. the privileges chart’s attempt to forewarn ‘behaviour students’ of what may come given their non-compliance is a tool of efficiency and standardization, meant for the classroom so that “…nothing happens that is not anticipated and prescribed (or gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 13 forewarned) in advance. no surprise endings.” (friesen et al., 2009, p. 154) (italicized comments are mine). if the regular classroom cannot do this well, then the unique classroom for behaviours will stress this work and make compliance a pre-requisite for returning to the normal. then, the hidden curriculum (pinar, 1995) of efficiency in regular classes becomes the given curriculum which has at its aim the normalization of students for their possible reintegration to the mainstream. as for the program of studies curriculum, the teacher shared that he was told to give the students worksheets and not expect much from students. the worksheets are also artifacts pointing to the efficiency movement embedded within the program of studies and in action within our classrooms (friesen et al., 2009; jardine et al., 2008). the assembly line metaphor is alive here. in the behaviour class, we could say we have a separate assembly line that is a fragment from the main line. this secondary line is intended to repair or fix that which is broken and thus fragmented so that it can be returned to the main line. after all, the stated goal of most behaviour programs is to reintegrate students back into ‘regular’ programming. this historically situated efficiency movement within schools can only return students to the main line of production and this will necessarily spit back out that which it produced in the first place unless a certain docility favouring the normal occurs. behaviour classes have also become places where at once we can comfortably say we educate ‘special’ students in community schools while those students are visibly divided from other students in their unique classes until such a time as they behave like those ‘normal’ students in the ‘regular’ school population. this process and conceptualization of students is deeply entrenched in the very common educational term ‘integration’ (winzer, 2009). this is an industrial version of schooling and it has been with us for over 100 years. over these past few years, as i have found my way around and within the topography of special education in schools it seems that once students enter these unique programs and their normalizing curriculum--once they leave the main line of student learning and production--the school community often detaches itself from the students. i have been witness to repeated conversations with educators in schools who claim these students ‘belong’ to the teacher of the behaviour program and not them. such empirical incidences demand us reconsider what it means when we say “we” and “our” students are part of school communities. are these healthy communities for all or convenient for most? hints of a resurfaced understanding, anew …there’s an interplay between the student, the teacher, all the personalities and that everybody needs to approach things with curiosity…there needs to be an amount of curiosity before there’s a passing down of that understanding and knowledge …so for me part of that year was trying to understand and so when i was trying to get a grip on it, i started to strip away all the things i knew to be wrong and i started to trust that the kids and i could figure it out. nothing i did with the class after that…after a certain point in the year last year, ever solely came from me...we made decisions together. so for me that was a moment, that was a turning point. that came about near the end of last year. after that, i didn’t think about the privileges chart. it just hung there. (teacher) despite these dominant historical traditions interwoven within education and special education, above and beyond this wantgilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 14 ing and doing of a structure which attempts to reproduce itself through its advocates, that which happens in the everyday interactions between these children and this teacher circumvents this very edifice. beyond structure, power, method, and the truths of how best to ‘manage’ kids, is what the teacher describes as his ‘intuition’ for a more humane way of being together. this intuition seems to be guided by a trust in himself and the students as well as a curiosity in and for the work of educating complex youth. he has learned this over the years as a teacher. experience in classrooms with students has helped cultivate wisdom in him. there is an awareness that no singular method, at least one centered on a notion of a dominating power over the children whose development is claimed to be challenged or special or exceptional, will do. such attempts at framing particular kinds of students as needing “policing” or using negatively driven, universal and tactless threats under the guise of privileged status will not do given his experiences with children already had. together, the teacher and i uncovered features of dominating ways of seeing and being with troubled students that we agree are not just ways of being with other human beings, especially children. we engaged in important interpretive work. this work allowed us the space or clearing to begin to speak of a deeper, richer, healthier wisdom gained and cultivated through our journeys with students. this wisdom spoke of goodwill, trust, and curiosity between an educator and his students. these re-emerged ways of being are ‘basics’ (jardine et al., 2008) worth cultivating. another moment of understanding arises within this: it is not that we recognized violations of students’ rights. we understood once again that being well with one another involves trust. trust is a basic to get back to in our work with students and one another. trust is required and is often laboured towards in healthy pedagogical relationships. without trust we are not able to dialogue or converse towards new understanding. with trust, we understand that we do have truthful wisdoms to share with one another. our professional, personal, and communal authority is restored with trust. the privileges chart speaks of mistrust--a pedagogical violence--present in our thinking about students with behavioural challenges. however, we can be well when there is unity between us (smith, 2011, p. 10). we might labour to get back to such basics. when we can do this in the context of an educational system striving for inclusion or for something more humane than the current codification of students and all that entails, then the question of what we ought to do for troubled students begins to be addressed justly, i propose. after much effort on all our parts to help jakob, he was beyond us at that time and he needed supports we could not provide. this too has been part of the suffering and understanding of our work. acknowledgements the author wishes to acknowledge drs. jim field, david jardine, and james paul for their intellectual contribution to this paper and reviews of earlier drafts of it. bio christopher m. gilham is a phd student in interpetive studies, graduate division of educational research in the faculty of education at the university of calgary. references alberta education. (2009). high school completion longitudinal study highlights. edmonton, ab, canada: author. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 15 alberta education. (2010). by special education code. retrieved from http:// education.alberta.ca/admin/special/stats/bycode.asp x alberta education. (2008). supporting positive behaviour in alberta schools. edmonton, ab, canada: author. baglieri, s., valle, j., connor, d., & gallagher, d. (2010). disability studies in education: the need for a plurality of perspectives on disability. remedial and special education, 32(4), 267-278. calgary board of education. (2008). student discipline, 6001. retrieved from http:// www. cbe.ab.ca/ policies/adminregs.asp cook, b., landrum, t., tankersley, m., & kauffman, j. (2003). bringing research to bear on practice: effecting evidence-based instruction for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. education & treatment of children, 26(4), 345-362. danforth, s. (2009). the incomplete child: an intellectual history of learning disabilities. new york, ny: peter lang. dudley-marling, c., & gurn, a. (2010). the myth of the normal curve. new york, ny: peter lang. foucault, m. (1977). discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. new york, ny: vintage books. foucault, m. (1999). abnormal: lectures at the college de france 1974 1975. new york, ny: pan books. friesen, s., jardine, d. w., & smith, d. g. (2009). on field(ing) knowledge. in s. goodchild, & b. sriraman, (eds.), relatively and philosophically earnest: festschrift in honor of paul ernest's 65th birthday (pp. 147-172). charlotte, nc: information age publishing. gadamer, h.-g. (1975). truth and method (j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). london: continuum. (original work published 1960). gallagher, d. (1998). the scientific knowledge base of special education: do we know what we think we know? exceptional children, 64(4), 493-502. heidegger, m. (1962). being and time. new york, ny: harper and row. jardine, d. (1992). reflections on education, hermeneutics, and ambiguity: hermeneutics as a restoring of life to its original difficulty. in w. pinar, & w. reynolds, (eds.), understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text (pp. 116-127). new york, ny: teachers college. jardine, d., friesen, s., & clifford, p. (2006). curriculum in abundance. new jersey, ny: lawrence erlbaum. jardine, d., friesen, s., & clifford, p. (2008). back to the basics of teaching and learning: thinking the world together. new york, ny: routledge. jardine, d., naqvi, r., jardine, e., & zaidi, a. (2010). “a zone of deep shadow”: pedagogical and familial reflections on “the clash of civilizations”. interchange, 41(3), 209-232. kauffman, j. m., crockett, j. b., gerber, m. m., & landrum, t. j. (2007). achieving the radical reform of special education : essays in honor of james m. kauffman. new york, ny: lawrence erlbaum associates. kauffman, j. m., & sasso, g. m. (2006). toward ending cultural and cognitive relativism gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 4 16 in special education. exceptionality, 14(2), 65-90. pinar, w. (1995). understanding curriculum : an introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. new york, ny: peter lang. oxford dictionaries online (2012). retrieved from http:// oxforddictionaries.com/ definition/ privilege ralston, d. c., & ho, j. (2010). philosophical reflections on disability. new york, ny: springer. skrtic, t. (1995). disability and democracy: reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity: new york, ny: teachers college press. smith, d. g. (2011). can wisdom trump the market as a basis for eeducation. in d. stanley& k. young (eds.), contemporary studies in canadian curriculum (pp. 153-185). calgary, ab, canada: detselig enterprises. taylor, f. w. (1911). the principles of scientific management. new york, ny: harper & brothers. thomas, g., & loxley, a. (2007). deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion: berkshire, england: open university press. valle, j. w., & connor, d. j. (2011). rethinking disability : a disability studies approach to inclusive practices. new york, ny: mcgraw-hill. van manen, m. (1990). researching lived experience : human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. albany, ny: state university of new york press. winzer, m. a. (2009). from integration to inclusion: a history of special education in the 20th century. washington, dc: gallaudet university press. wrathall, m. a. (2011). heidegger and unconcealment: new york, ny: cambridge university press. microsoft word kostouros corrected proof.docx corresponding author: patricia kostouros, phd email: pkostouros@mtroyal.ca journal of applied hermeneutics june 9, 2013 the author(s) 2013 my father was not my father: an attempted understanding through a ricoeurian lens patricia kostouros abstract in my phd studies, i was honoured to have been introduced to the scholar paul ricoeur, whose work became central to my dissertation topic. in this paper, i share the ways in which ricoeur’s conceptualizations of hermeneutic application to the human existence came to life for me. i use an existential event, discovering non-biological parentage, to bring forth my understanding of these concepts. ricoeur’s solicitation of the hermeneutic practice allowed me to see family events in a new light. it is my hope through my application of ricoeur’s work that others will interpret existential life events in new and exciting ways. keywords narrative-identity, ricoeur, self-understanding, temporality my other earliest memory is vague, no more than a distant feeling that i can sometimes seize, most often not. being so dimly remembered, perhaps it came first. i became aware of a voice inside my head. what is this, i wondered. who are you, voice? when will you shut up? i remembered a feeling of fright. it was only later that i realized that this voice was my own thinking, that this moment of anguish was my first inkling that i was a ceaseless monologue trapped within myself. taken from self, by yann martel, 1996 early in my life, i became aware of the narratives about my biological parentage. being the only blonde, blue-eyed, small person in our family, people often wondered if my father was actually my father. since i looked somewhat like my mother, it was only his contribution that was in question. at some point, around the age of four or five years, i remember my older sister telling me i was kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 2 adopted. while i tried hard not to believe her, there were signs everywhere that this narrative may actually be true. occasionally, i would ask my parents if this was actual, and typically, they would reassure me that i was fully theirs. to allay my concerns my father would tell me stories of how the greeks were originally blonde and blue-eyed until turkey invaded. hence, my “difference” was attributed to a recessive gene. i do not recall that these stories ever dispelled my suspicion; a simple glance at my family could easily confirm the concerns i expressed. my suspicions lingered throughout my life and eventually lead to a candid conversation with my father in my adulthood, prior to his death. at some point before my father died, he confided in me that my mother had had an affair and that i may not actually be his child. my relationship with my father had been rocky until i spent more time with him as an adult before he died. when he confirmed my existing suspicion, we decided that, biological or not, he was my father, a man i had come to know and admire. i put the biological parentage issue out of my mind for several years thereafter. however, after my mother died, i had regretted that i had not questioned her about the potential that my father was not my father and that i have a parent that may or may not know i exist. i suppose i hesitated discussing this with my mother because i typically found myself in an in-between space of already knowing but not wanting to confirm. perhaps the decision that, regardless of biology, he was my father was made more for him than me. perhaps the lingering childhood signs would not be eclipsed. after thinking long and hard, and being encouraged by my partner, i decided to have dna testing complete in order to give me a more solid answer. it was not so much a desire to find a biological father but rather to confirm what i already felt at times as a child; like i was tolerated, rather than i belonged. since my father had already passed away, i had to request a dna sample from my brother. my brother asked that i share the results, and knowing my family, if i shared with one, i shared with everyone. i agreed to share whatever information came my way. we retrieved dna samples, submitted them to the laboratory, and then waited patiently for the results. the letter finally arrived and i anxiously read the statistical analysis, thinking “okay, okay, but what does all this mean?!” finally, after synthesising the data there was my answer: only a .058 probability of full sibling-ship, likelihood “probability of relatedness, maternal half-siblings.” so it was confirmed, my father was not my father. my initial reaction was that this information should not really change anything. i already had an inkling about the results; however, i did start to hesitate when people would ask me about my last name and its origin. i would be pulled up short by questions about my heritage and often felt caught between answering that my father was greek, and being more reticent in my response, since i now know my father was not my father. the dna testing results created a watershed moment of understanding self and the narratives that existed about my heritage and in particular, being a blonde greek. i also began to wonder about whether my biology should or would trump the narratives i hold of being greek. how do i understand myself now, in light of this new information? does this new information change my attestations? do the years i spent thinking i was greek suddenly vanish or do they continue to reside inside me? does this existential event add to or limit my selfunderstanding? how might paul ricoeur’s theory explain this experience and the narrative self? in my address of these questions, i will bring to light ricoeur’s conceptualizations, while using my own experiences as a thread kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 3 that weaves these concepts together. i must confess however, that given the depth and breadth of ricoeur’s work, my ability to synthesize his theory and my experiences within these pages will be limited. ricoeur’s work offers a starting place for engaging the questions that surfaced for me as i confronted this new information. besides highlighting ricoeur’s concepts and the links to my selfunderstanding, what i present are the thoughts and questions that were raised as i searched ricoeur’s work for direction, some of which still linger unrequited. why use ricoeur’s hermeneutics? as i am now faced with the knowledge that my father was not my father, i am struck by the opportunity that this affords me. while the entire narrative about my background is not false, this event has fractured an existing narrative about who i am and how i came to be. ricoeur offers an interpretive slant that considers both self and others as well as time. for ricoeur (1992), hermeneutics, or interpretation, takes place indirectly and dialectically, by encountering symbols (reference that provide a detour) which are interpreted, reflected upon, and incorporated into the self. i had conflicting information as a child. i had the signs and symbols that i did not belong; after all i looked different. however, i also had dialogue from my parents that contradicted these signs. hermeneutics in general is known as an interpretive approach to a topic that allows the opening up of the world around us and to uncover and seek an understanding of the ways in which we live, engage and experience this world (gadamer, 2004). i needed a hermeneutic approach to interpreting the new and the old and integrate the new into an enlarged self-understanding. in his book oneself as another, ricoeur (1992) asked, “what sort of being is the self” (p. 297)? by asking this question, ricoeur took a critical twist in which he posited that knowing the self can only be accomplished through encountering one’s own self as well as others “that the selfhood of oneself implies otherness to such an intimate degree that one cannot be thought of without the other” (p. 3). by this statement, ricoeur (1992) referred to the otherness of the self. we belong and live communally and, therefore, we come into contact with others (other than self) in the world who inform us, and act as a mediating force, which could potentially create change in the self, as well as our ethical actions in the world (ricoeur, 1992). however, this mediating force is best accomplished when faced with difference; “as long as one remains within the circle of sameness-identity, the otherness of the other than self offers nothing original” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 3). i was clearly faced with difference in my family, but the narratives, which had a historical grounding, acted as a gatekeeper to further inquiry. ricoeur’s (1998) idea of self differs from the objectivist ontological stance; that is, things outside of us exist independently. instead, ricoeur (1992) understood that we are bound by the conditions around us and that these conditions create the perceptions of self and others and, therefore, we are created narrations. i bought the family narratives, for the most part, because i could then say i belonged, even if thoughts otherwise lingered. additionally, i could take up his work because ricoeur (1988) differed from others in his thinking about “being” in that he attempted to deal fully with the notion of time and its connection to our lived experience, and in order to understand time, we must understand time as an experience. since the chronology of time does not speak to our experiences of time, ricoeur’s ontological curve examined temporal experiences in particular, the language of time, for example in my wondering about the dna results, “it didn’t matter at the time,” or “i wonder now.” the way we take kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 4 the language of time and narrate our selfunderstanding was critical in ricoeur’s later work, according to most ricoeur scholars (e.g., andrew, 2001; hall, 2007; kearney, 2004; langdridge, 2004; mccarty, 2007; muldoon, 2002; 2006; pellauer, 2007). i understood myself as a blonde greek, my father disclosed information that increased my suspicions, but at the time of his disclosure, it did not matter. using language such as “then” and “now” allow our narratives to move through time. furthermore, ricoeur’s ontological shift about time related to moving from the “what” of time to the “who” experiences time. in doing so, ricoeur was able to link time and self to narratives. existential events “thus the imagined nothingness of the self becomes the existential crisis of the self.” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 168) i have identified the dna testing and the results i received as an existential event. i have done so because of what the event offered me. in some respects, this event has given me the opportunity to reinvent myself; to change my narrative, if you will. for example, i had already experienced a very challenging, difficult, and therefore, non-existent relationship with my older sister, and a rather disappointing relationship with my brother so when i received the results of my dna test, part of me was elated that i was not fully connected to these siblings. on the other hand, i never wanted my older sister to be right about me not being a “real” member of the family, and i was always trying to prove that i did belong. what would happen to everything for which i fought? my attestations were false, she was right, where does that leave me in terms of this family, since we no longer have parents to mediate the divide? i must consider that i cannot simply dismiss my past, since these family and cultural narratives contributed to how i came to be who i am now. according to ricoeur (1980), “no authentic anticipation of what we ‘may have to be’ is possible without borrowing from the resources of what we already ‘have been’” (p. 181). i was encountering difference in my family of origin. i have always been different from them. i have the opportunity now to own my difference, yet maintain some family narratives since these too exist. the term existential (n.d.) can be traced back to the work of kierkegaard and essentially means conditions of existence, and is an occurrence. perhaps, then, an existential event is one that “happens to us over and above our wanting and doing” (gadamer, 2004, p. xxvi). ricoeur (1984) described an event as something mediated and constrained. our experiences happen to us but they are temporal in that a subjective perception of an event will be dependent on our past and the appropriation of that event will influence our future. risser (1986) stated that the hermeneutic interpretation of event or experience starts from one’s perception and, in particular, suggested that once we experience something we cannot experience it again in the same way because “the experience changes the experiencer” (p. 44). how i as an experiencer might perceive an event will depend on prior conditioning. even though i was told i was a blonde greek, there were enough signs saying otherwise that made it possible for me to take up the dna testing. remembering that, according to ricoeur (1998), we are always “en route,” when we experience an event, our history, culture, and language will therefore be determined by some of what we perceive. being true to ricoeur, however, means that one must recognize that these perceptions are mediated through language, or rather, “all discourse is produced as an event...but understood as meaning” (p. 167). my sister’s accusations that i was kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 5 adopted eventually coupled with my father’s disclosure, produced the event of dna testing. a shaky foundation of self and belonging in this family already existed, but early on could be countered by attestations from my mother and father. receiving the results that i was not biologically related to my father answered for me some questions about our past relationship, but at the same time, my former perceptions of family began to crumble. ricoeur (2004a) referred to discourse as an event because it is referencing something “in the intention of saying something about something to someone: speaking is the act by which language moves beyond itself as a sign toward its reference and toward what it encounters” (p. 82). in other words, discourse, the use of language, is action. additionally, ricoeur (1984) wedded events and narratives in that one depends on the other since they cannot be mutually exclusive; an event will exist because it is narrated, and a narration exists because of the event. in particular, narratives are received and, therefore, narratives are always open for another’s interpretation of the narration. my sister’s accusations – you don’t belong; my emphatic protests – i belong. my attestations as a child of belonging however would only go so far since there were constant references otherwise, i don’t look like them. finally, ricoeur (1992) viewed human actions as similar to a text that can be interpreted. my father’s disclosure, an action; is this a space for interpretation of past events? ricoeur (1984) saw the usefulness of structuralism in the task of hermeneutic interpretation since structuralism assists with revealing the hidden structures in language and in recovering meaning. while language is primary to ricoeur’s hermeneutics, he does not subscribe to linguistics as a primary mode of analysis. rather, ricoeur stated that text, or discourse, “says something about something” (p. 78) and that references open up the world and our existence in the world. we rescue meaning by attending to the language used, and we interpret by attending to what language points toward. the dna results pointed to a truth. even though these results are definitive, it is possible to find meaning in my family experiences in a greek household. do these results have to unravel everything i understood about myself? in ricoeur’s (2004b) discussion about the intention of hermeneutics in relation to the interpretation of “every meaningful discourse” (p. 4), he stated: in fact, meaningful discourse is hermeneia, “interprets” reality, precisely to the degree that it says something of something. moreover, discourse is hermeneia because a discursive statement is a grasp of the real meaningful expression, not a selection of so-called impressions coming from the things themselves. (p. 4) in other words, we comprehend and make meaning of that which is in front of us which may open up existential possibilities. why didn’t my father support my extra-curricular activities? why would he look at me that ways sometimes? why would he leave the room? perhaps i have been given the opportunity to interpret family interactions in new ways, with a new understanding of my otherness. perhaps it is hard to pretend, when you believe that the child is not yours. i fondly recall the family talks we had at the kitchen table. my father would frequently make sunday dinners and we would sit afterwards and talk for hours. that is where i learned about the digestive usefulness of grand marnier, that anita bryant was an “idiot,” and that the boston bruins were the best hockey team in the nhl. these conversations, or discourses, were always about something, kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 6 and they laid down a foundation for how i take up the world today and shaped how i accepted or rejected my past. for example, while i am not a hockey fan, i do drink grand marnier. more importantly, i began to narrate the political world and my actions in it, based on these discourses around that kitchen table. one cannot simply narrate or frame, but, according to ricoeur (1998), context affects meaning, and thereby how and where the narration takes place and what the narration is about matters. in a dialogue about interpretation, ricoeur (1998) explained that, “sensitivity to context is the necessary complement” (p. 44). i do not look like them. ricoeur (1974) was clear to point out that “language is innocent – language meaning the tool, the code – because it does not speak, it is spoken” (p. 91). if narrative matters, as kearney (2004) argued in support of ricoeur’s position, then what we do with a narrative should also matter. therefore, the narrator, not just the narration itself, is in need of consideration since the narrator is an acting agent, a “who.” my father was an acting agent when he disclosed my mother’s affair. i was the acting agent requesting the dna test. i knew that taking this step would result in solidifying or fragmenting my self-understanding as a family member and could further unravel the sibling relationships. in taking up the focus on the concept of the “what” of the event, ricoeur (1992) reminded us that a “what” also has a “who,” and a “why.” in particular, during ricoeur’s reflections on selfhood, he expressed the importance of the “who” by talking about something that matters and distinguishing the differences between what and who, that is, “how can we ask ourselves what matters if we could not ask to whom the thing mattered or not? does not the questioning about what matters or not depend upon self-concern, which indeed seems to be constitutive of self-hood” (ricoeur 1992, p. 137)? at the time i decided biological or not, he was my father...i regretted not asking...how do i understand myself now in light of this new information? it is important to discuss intentionality in relation to this existential event since it connects ricoeur’s theory and the way in which existential events create or limit possibilities for self-understanding. when deliberating about intention, ricoeur (1992) referred to the importance of the “what” and “who” of action. ricoeur (2004b) stated that interpretation has an intention to match reader, “who,” and text “what,” “thereby incorporating its meaning into the present comprehension a man is able to have of himself” (p. 4). ricoeur would likely say that we know ourselves through our actions and our actions lead us toward selfnarration. narrating events narration, according to ricoeur (1984), involves emplotment; the making of an event into a story. a plot has a direction and according to ricoeur (1998), “an event must be more than a singular occurrence: it must be defined in terms of its contribution to the development of a plot” (p. 277). ricoeur (1984) described the importance of the plot having direction so that we follow along and by doing so we are able to make meaning of the story being narrated, in particular, to reflect upon the story, and to integrate the meaning made into our own existence and human action. however, ricoeur (1984) was also clear to point out that “emplotment is never the simple triumph of order” (p. 73). while my life has had a direction forward, it is in the backward glance to events along the way, the way he looks at me, my sister’s attestations, you may not be my child, that prompted the action of requesting a dna test which then leads to a continuation of the plot; the fragkostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 7 menting of my self-understating and reinventing myself. in his discussion of aristotle’s poetics, ricoeur (1984) described the art of composing as “organizing the events into a system” (p. 33) or, in other words, a plot or “muthos” (p. 31). since historical events are constructed narratives (ricoeur, 1988), the historian or narrator interprets that event and therefore, historical accounts, for example, turkey invaded greece, are not the same as natural events such as earthquakes. these historical accounts weave through our personal narratives to augment the plot we are creating about who we are and how we belong, greeks were once blonde and blue eyed; i should believe them. ricoeur (1992) recognized the opportunity for narrations to highlight human potential, and the possibilities for action. narratives assist in mediating events across time thereby creating a meaningful whole and recognition that reality may be temporal. my narrative as a greek existed temporarily and was established only through discourse; the signs said otherwise. ricoeur’s (1984) ideas about narrative took up history and fiction, both of which involve time. fictional narratives may draw on actual events, and they are representations of such. historical narratives may involve the recounting of empirical events (ricoeur, 1984). in order for historical events, for example, to be appropriately narrated it must remain in its context and contribute to a plot (ricoeur, 1984). ricoeur (1998; 2004c) argued that historical accounts are narrative in that they account for real events and those narratives that accompany them. in particular, ricoeur (1998) stated, “however fictional the historical text may be it claims nevertheless to be a representation of reality. in other words history is both a literary artefact (and in this sense a fiction) and a representation of reality” (p. 291). turkey really did invade greece hence my blondeness. the reality however, is that i am not an offspring of this greek man. ricoeur (1984) suggested that the past is only accessible to us through our narratives since “when it was present, this past was like our present, confused, multiform, and unintelligible” (p. 99). therefore, “there is only a history of the potentialities of the present” (ricoeur, 1998, p. 295). the present reality affords me the opportunity to reinvent my future identity to re-narrate myself. the narrated self we can see how ricoeur’s thinking about temporality affects the narrative self and the ways in which time folded upon itself, reflecting back, can create a discordant-concordant dynamic. in particular, entering into a discussion about the way in which we come to have stability as a narrated self through time, ricoeur (1992) distinguished the identity as having an ipse-identity and an idem-identity. he pointed out that these two parts are not necessarily found on a continuum, from one end of identity to the other, but rather contribute in different ways to an identity. additionally, he claimed that these two parts of the self both depart yet intersect and endure through time. narrative identity lies between ipse and idem identity and is mediated by them and links actions and ethics with identity since “there is no ethically neutral narrative” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 115). the ipse, also called selfhood (ricoeur, 1992), is the part of the self that is a reflexive being and has self-constancy. the term constancy in this context does not relate to a static composition but rather a self that is carried forward through time, thereby weaving through horizons of the past, present and future and through interpretations and reinterpretations. in my case, as an example, having thought i was greek sits in the past, now that i know my father is not my father. kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 8 how i bring the dna results into my present and future is a matter of how i might interpret what father means, or what it means to have been brought up in a greek household. ipse is also defined by ricoeur as one’s bond or making and keeping a promise. i shared the results of the dna testing as i said i would. in other words, the ipse relates to the human activities that are maintained as a claiming of the self to the self. for example, in relation to keeping one’s word, ricoeur (1992) explained that the ipse appears to “stand as a challenge to time, a denial of change” (p. 124), since keeping one’s word or promise is done so regardless of time or circumstances. a promise speaks to the esteem we give ourselves and to others, and recognizes that language is the place where we extend ourselves to others through time. ipse, therefore, is anchored in the presence of an other than self, since it is related to our actions. i shared the results of the dna testing. according to ricoeur (1992), it is at this juncture that ipse and idem depart. the idem, what ricoeur (1992) also called sameness, differs from the ipse in that the idem relates to the continuity of an individual’s dimensions over time. while there may be some changes over time to these features, they will always maintain some permanence; that is, time could be said to “threaten resemblance without destroying it” (ricoeur, p. 117). it was important for ricoeur to move beyond the mind-body dichotomy, where identity was concerned. idem, or personal identity, is not strictly substance, such as brain or body continuity, for example, i am blonde and blue eyed, but is also related to traits or habits that become incorporated into the self to the point where one is recognizable as the same through actions. ricoeur called the idem the “’what’ of the ‘who’” (p. 122). i am tentative with my older sister and always have been. according to ricoeur (1992), both idem and ipse have constancy, permanency in time, and while separate, they may overlap. ricoeur described that the ipse and idem sometimes overlap, and “this overlapping, however, does not abolish the difference separating the two problematics: precisely as second nature, my character is me, myself, ipse; but this ipse announces itself as idem” (p. 121). at the same time, however, these parts of our identity are separate, in that “keeping one’s word expresses a self-constancy which cannot be inscribed as character was…the perseverance of character is one thing, the perseverance of faithfulness to a word that has been given is something else again” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 123). since the ipse and idem are “two modes of being” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 308), they must find an accord, in that, the constancy of one relies on the constancy of the other, and, through contracting with one another the ipse and idem negotiate the narrated, capable self. at the time, since i was appreciating the adult relationship i had gained with my father, it did not matter if he was biologically connected or not. over time this changed for me. i had to negotiate between completing the dna testing and potentially breach my word, regardless you are my father, or if i my own curiosity, spurred by my never-ending suspicion, was honouring my need for selfunderstanding. time was also a factor since my brother was ill. negotiating the idem and ipse was necessary for my plot to continue. in a discussion about the “capable self,” ricoeur (1992) pulled in the concept of reflexivity and explained that our reflexive nature allows us to ask questions about identity, that is, the “who.” what does it mean now that i know i am not greek? does this information have to disintegrate my selfunderstanding? one of the ways in which ricoeur suggested that we know we persist through time is through such activities as speaking, action, and responsibility. there is a kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 9 certainty about our existence, which ricoeur called “attestation.” essentially, attestation refers to one’s ability to attest to his or herself and to the ability to be responsible for that declaration. i do belong; you may not be my child. ricoeur reminded us that, whatever we attest to, be it the world or self, attestation is mediated. the narrated self is fragile (ricoeur 1992). according to ricoeur, since we are narrating ourselves on both actual and constituted experiences, we are always becoming and constantly refiguring ourselves. however, by using either fiction or historical accounts, we are able to uncover meaning and transform ourselves. attestation helps us decide about conflicting accounts of the narrative self (ricoeur, 1992). to what can we attest? if i am confused, are there facts that i can orient myself toward that will assist with the conflict and, therefore, assist with settling on a particular narrative? i am blonde, i am not greek. i don’t look like him, he is not my father. nevertheless, according to ricoeur (1998), in order to attest, these facts or narratives must be acceptable and plausible. turkey did invade greece, could my difference be the result of a recessive gene? temporality, narrative, and action “...time becomes human to the extent that it is articulated through a narrative mode, and narrative attains its full meaning when it becomes a condition of temporal existence.” (ricoeur, 1984, p. 52) narratives or stories are the ways in which we make sense of temporality, that is, “the world unfolded by every narrative work is a temporal world” (ricoeur, 1984, p. 3). we are able to describe human actions through mimesis, a pre-figuring, configuring and refiguring of actions based on what has gone before, how we interpret the past, and where it takes us. we bring the past into the present to inform us and therefore, create narratives. in order to illuminate narrative activity and temporality, ricoeur (1984) described a “three-fold mimesis” (p. 52), which included mimesis1, mimesis2 and mimesis3. mimesis1 (pre-figuration) refers to our pre-understandings of practical action. three layers lie within memisis1 including the structural use of language in that language assists with the understanding of action. a second layer relates to the ways in which symbols assist in narrations, and the ways in which contexts will inform narrations. i don’t look like them, maybe my sister is right. finally, actions have a temporal nature as seen in the language of adverbs, for example, “now,” i am not greek, and “then” i am greek. mimesis2 (configuration) acts as a mediating role between memisis1 and memisis3 and assists the reader in following a plot. a plot then becomes configured when this mediating function “transforms the events or incidents into a story” (ricoeur, 1984, p. 65). emplotment refers to the ways in which we organize, or configure, activities into a plot. i was greek, i am not greek anymore. where does all my understanding as a greek now reside? finally, mimesis3 (re-figuration) refers to the ways in which a reading or interaction could influence a change or re-figure our being-in-the-world and allow possibilities to arise. what will i tell my grandchildren about their lineage? ricoeur (1984) explained that these forms of mimesis provide a creative tension that work together to relate time to narrative and create human time. in essence, ricoeur showed how these forms depend on one another in both time and narrative, in that “we are following therefore the destiny of a prefigured time that becomes a refigured time through the mediation of a configured time” (p. 54). concerned that he may be creating a vicious circle, ricoeur dealt with this dilemkostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 10 ma by discussing the transitory functions between the forms, or mimesis. while recognizing that the circular nature of narrative and time do not stop, ricoeur stated, “i would rather speak of an endless spiral that would carry the mediation past the same point a number of times, but at different altitudes” (p. 72). ricoeur’s (1984, 1985, 1988) work in his three volumes of time and narrative illustrated that historical accounts are more than facts since they are constructed and narrated events. narratives allow us to make sense of ourselves, and by organizing our life events into a plot, we humanize time that might otherwise become “fragmented moments” (kearney, 2002, p. 4). according to ricoeur (1988), time becomes humanized because we narrate and, therefore, we move time from the cosmos and merge with it into our lives. emplotment changes chronological time into relationships between humans and time and in particular, the beginning, middle, and end (not necessarily in that order) of a narration creates temporality, while at the same time it helps create unity. ricoeur (1985) suggested that narratives allow us to play with time, for example, our use of verb tenses. i have a father, i had a father, i am greek, i was greek. we are acting agents in human time, and our actions will leave its mark on historical time, which could then be brought into the future. my father’s disclosure, i opted for dna testing, and i will never be greek. we need chronological time in order to make sense of past and new experiences, to provide them a place in time, after my father’s death. the lived present allows us to have new beginnings, possibilities, and the “narrative identity continues to make and unmake itself” (ricoeur, 1988, p. 249). i can take up ricoeur’s linking of time and narrative, and unapologetically reconstruct a past narrative and change the mark i leave in historical time. ricoeur (1980) spoke of the telling and retelling of a story or narrative as one of the connections we have with temporality. for example, in the telling of a story he discussed the structure of a narrative as having a beginning, middle, and an end (ricoeur, 1980). when a plot is structured in such a way, there is what he called a “then” an “and then,” or a “so on” (ricoeur, 1980, p. 179), which are the connecting episodes that involve both plot (narrative) and time (and then). in this way, we follow along in present cosmic time even though a story may itself take place at different time. greece was invaded, that is why you are blonde. when a story is re-told, it changes its place in cosmic time. now the story has a history because of the recollecting that takes place. ricoeur (1980) suggested that the function of a narrative is related to human actions and that our actions lead to narratives that become temporal structures. in essence, ricoeur (1988) suggested, “we are affected by history and that we affect ourselves by the history we make” (p. 213). greece was invaded and therefore fewer blondes, but i see the differences in how you treated me, i want to know, i will do the testing, i am not yours. in relation to narratives and plots, ricoeur (1984, 1985, 1992) described a dynamic process involving concordant and discordant elements, that is, the arrangements of fact and reversals of fortune within a story. my sister was right. in much the same way, we construct our own stories and act as the characters within that story. i want to know for sure; my suspicions will not abate. we follow a plot and, through time, we weave the events that take place in our lives into a meaningful whole. i was a sibling and i am now a halfsibling. plot and character are dynamic elements of a narrative and “it is the identity of the story that makes the identity of the character” (ricoeur, 1992, p.148); however, these elekostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 11 ments must be credible. essentially, the character acts and is acted upon, and we evaluate the actions of the character, and in so doing we identify with the character and the story. ricoeur (1992) believed that human lives are readable, and are even more readable when the stories people tell of themselves are told through historical or fictional narratives, which, in turn, are interpreted into our own lives. the stories my father told me about greece being invaded were historical narratives which allowed an interpretation of greeks being blonde and blue eyed. therefore, i did belong, i was greek. these narratives of life are never complete, however (ricoeur, 1988), until the story is over. i’m going to die, you need to know, i may not be your father. ricoeur (1992) recognized also that our narratives are not created in a vacuum; we are enmeshed in prior stories and tradition along with others. we encounter others, within a cultural context and these interactions contribute to our own narratives. they say i am greek, i don’t look like them, i don’t want to be adopted, i want to belong. these interactions assist us in determining our actions. protests, asking parents. our narratives start to weave with those of others, and we create stories about our shared identity. i reflect on those discussions at the kitchen table. for example, my narrative is constituted by the fact that i am a sibling and have been told stories about what that means. additionally, we have a heritage. this heritage is constituted through historical narratives, having been told through the ages, for example, the way in which a father is taken up in a particular culture. therefore, the changes i encountered about the biology of my father becomes existential because of the meanings passed down, from not only my own family, but these meanings are also encapsulated in the narratives that have been told about fathers for centuries, for example, myths, particularly those stemming from a greek culture. we are affected by our past that is not created by us; we have a picture of the present mediated through our cultural landscapes. however, our actions throw us into the future and in doing so we potentially change ourselves. i have done the testing, i am not greek. we become actors in the world, while being constituted by our past; however, we also have freedom (ricoeur, 1992). all narratives, whether real or fictional, according to ricoeur (1992), have some ethical element. for ricoeur (1992), our human actions are located in time and space, and while time and space may act as a constraint, these root us and enable us to view a persistent self. additionally, ricoeur (1998) suggested that we recognize ourselves and take responsibility for our actions through self-examination. if i didn’t want the answer why did i do the testing? in short, ricoeur (1998) said that we learn about ourselves through acts that are exterior to the self, which then return to us, with information, through others or symbols. we then take that information, evaluate it, and examine it to determine meaning. does parental lineage matter? acting agents and human capability throughout ricoeur’s (1992) work, there is reference to an agent’s acting and suffering “for my part, i will never forget to speak of humans as acting and suffering” (p. 145). suffering comes from the misery experienced when the self is not yet realised, but it is seen in potential for action (hall, 2007). according to ricoeur (1988), we find axial moments, which give structure to time and connect us to events in historical time, moments that have left a trace, and “to follow a trace is one way of ‘reckoning with time’” (p.124). in order to “reckon with time,” we give utterance to events, and in particular speak of actions. actions move what is potential toward actuality. i may not be your father; my brother is ill, i should do the testing; i am not his. kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 12 actions leave a mark in time, a trace, much like a text is archived, and therefore, according to ricoeur (1992), human action can be interpreted. why didn’t my parents tell me? why did my father wait until he was close to death? why didn’t i ever ask my mother about my biological father? our actions, or inactions, can be interpreted. perhaps my mother’s guilt kept her from telling me; perhaps my father had a part to play in her affair; perhaps it did not matter to him either until we had a better relationship. actions, according to ricoeur (1992), can be studied “following a three-step rhythm: describing, narrating, prescribing” (p. 20). essentially, this process assists in moving from practice to ethics since prescribing involves judgment, “good” or “bad.” through narratives, we have received models or descriptions of how to act; through reading or dialogue we access our imagination and apply that to the real world and, therefore, we can act. my father was a generous man; it would not be outside of his character to welcome a child that was not his, even if i was a reminder for him of my mother’s infidelity. distanciation and appropriation in order to judge one’s act, or to examine one’s self, there needs to be a certain amount of distance. ricoeur (1992, 1998) used the term distanciation to describe the act of objectifying a text (or discourse, or self) in order for it to be liberated. once distanced, interpretation is no longer tied to the original intent and, therefore, can be brought forward to be made meaningful to the person in the present. it is not what the statistical analysis of dna results mean, but rather what they mean to me given my past and present, and what it means about my heritage. in the process of experiencing and interpreting an event, it is not necessarily the event that endures, but the meaning and “the interpretation becomes an event” (ricoeur, 1998, p. 185). what does having a father mean and what does having a greek father mean? in his discussion in relation to distanciation and appropriation, ricoeur (1998) explained that we do not “impose” ourselves on a text, but rather we “expose” ourselves in order to discover a “proposed” world (pp. 142-143). as we distanciate the original intention of the text, we expose ourselves, use our imagination (reflect), and we invite “new possibilities of being-in-the-world” (ricoeur, 1998, p. 142) and we become an enlarged self. while distance frees meaning, appropriation allows us to make the meaning familiar. in particular, ricoeur claimed that “distanciation, in all its forms and figures, constitutes par excellence the critical moment in understanding” (p. 113). action much of ricoeur’s (1984, 1985, 1988, 1998) work on narrative relates to the way in which we interact with a text. as we read, we also re-read ourselves through the varied characters and the plots. we evaluate the character’s actions and potentially “elevate them to the rank of persons” (ricoeur, 1985, p. 41). much like the reading of a novel, we respond to the people in our lives in similar ways. we interpret the actions of others and attend to the social and public spheres. inherent in our ability to be an acting agent is our corporeality. my body interacts in the world, and i have a “corporeal anchoring in the world” (ricoeur, 1992, p. 150.). human capacity is conditional since the body will be either active or passive depending on needs or desires and interactions with others (hall, 2007; muldoon, 2002). i could have chosen not to complete the dna testing and accepted a state of not knowing. our needs or desires have the potential to direct activity, while our bodily senses ground our existence in the world. furthermore, according to ricoeur (as kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 13 cited in kearney, 2004), our perceptions are subject to emotions. because of the early childhood distance i perceived our relationship in a certain way. as i got to know my father, as an adult, i became more emotionally connected. had i remained emotionally distant, the dna results may not have spurred me to wonder existentially about what it means to have been brought up greek, with a greek father. accordingly, our openness to the world and our ability to interpret and engage will depend on our affective perception. am i sad or happy about the dna results? affective perceptions will either open us to a world of possibility or limit openness due to vulnerability. i have a new understanding of being a half-sibling. i resent my sister for being right, and i will likely avoid her in the future. our freedom is revealed through our character. apparently, ricoeur (as cited in muldoon, 2002) believed that we want to represent our ideal self and strive toward happiness. the desire for happiness leads to our perception of possibilities for our human capacity (ricoeur, 1992). happiness, however, being an emotion, may be in conflict with reason and, therefore, contributes to our frailty. while we are cognizant of our frailty and we may feel misery because of it, these conditions, lead us to actions, and a will to respond. does the biology of my father matter? should i do the testing? what do i understand about myself now that i know i am not greek and only partially related to this family? what does it mean to be without a cultural lineage? ricoeur’s (1992) work pointed to the importance of choices and actions in the world with others. we exist with others and, our interactions with others can inform us when we reflect on our human capacity. narratives help us mediate within our public spaces. engagement with others is key to our selfhood (ricoeur, 1992), and narratives direct our action to live communally. what should i tell others when they ask about the origin of my last name? others can assist in attestations and verify truths. my brother’s dna is unlike my own. on the other hand, others could provide a different perspective. you are our child. self-understanding “...reflection is nothing without the mediation of signs and works, and the explanation is nothing if not incorporated as an intermediary stage in the process of self-understanding.” (ricoeur, 1998, p. 159). the past and present confront one another and merge together, and as we interpret the past, we bring new meaning made into the present, which leads to an increased selfunderstanding. self-understanding is mediated through reflection, and “the self of selfknowledge is the fruit of an examined life” (ricoeur, 1988, p. 247). when we reflect not only on ourselves but also on the community in which we live, we attest to ourselves about who we are and how we live. the external environment, our community or culture will validate this attestation, which over time will also lead to self-constancy. existential events offer opportunities for a re-reading of the self when examined for the ways in which narratives have shaped both the self and the interpretation of the events. existential events create a temporality of experience. time becomes humanized in the way that we respond to our history, bring it into the present and in consideration of the future. while engaged in this self-examination we may stay true to ourselves; however, we may also critique the narratives that have created who we are now, and through the dialect between present understanding and potential, we may become refigured, considering that “understanding is not concerned with grasping a fact but with apprehending a possibility of being” (ricoeur, kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 14 1998, p. 56). since we reside in both actuality and potential, we are always becoming. ricoeur and my self-understanding while i was narrated to believe that family is of the utmost importance, i had gradually distanced myself from my family for many years, that is, until my father became ill and i decided to return home. i had one opportunity to get to know him by means of having an adult relationship with him and i was willing to see where it would go, thereby being open to the possibilities. this prior distancing (distanciation) of myself from my family allowed me to face new experiences that were taken up (appropriated) into a newly developing identity. this process was not easy and it certainly was not fast, nor is it over. when i returned to victoria, i found a family that had remained closed, isolated, and stuck in the past (limited, misery). our relationships were frail for several years as we attempted to create new narrations out of our shared present. however, the narrations of the past continued to loom over us. eventually, as my father’s illness became more serious, he began to talk openly about his life. since i was the only family member willing to talk about death and dying, he shared many stories with me, many of which i was later honoured to share at his funeral. in particular, he told me that it was likely that i was not his child (existential event). while this fact had always been a rumour, it did not concern me so much in my past because in the past i had no real relationship with him (memesis1). then, suddenly, through our shared present, back in my family context as an adult (memesis2) i recognized him as a person, a father, who had not been there before. i knew then that i was going to miss him (mimesis3). this event helped me to reflect on the characteristics (ipse/idem) that i now possess, which are both inherited and mediated. when i consider the culturally and socially mediated values i possess, i know by letting go and rejecting some, while maintaining others, my narrated self has been moving forward through time and my identity has shifted. i continue to question what it means to have a biological lineage on this earth, that is, wondering if somehow it ties me to the human race in a certain way, or perhaps not knowing my biology creates more freedom and less othering (self and other than self). through a series of events, my relationship with my brother has become strained to the point in which we had not spoken for a long time. for certain, i have had no relationship to speak of with my oldest sister for many years. recently, i received a call that my brother had been diagnosed terminally ill. i needed to decide whether my ties to this family were strong enough to warrant a visit, particularly since i would likely encounter my older sister. i was called upon to muster up my human capacity to care (ethics and action). i went to victoria and visited my family. while visiting with my family, we had many conversations, some about death and dying, which brought us around to discussions about our parents. the dna test results were discussed and once again, particularly noting, that i was not biologically connected to my father, and that i was not greek (referent). while, in the past i had protested, i now knew (attestation/verification) that it was true that he was not my father; however, my protests continued, but changed, since, as my partner continues to remind me, “just because he was not your father, does not mean your father was not greek.” references andrew, j. d. (2000). tracing ricoeur. diatrics 30(2), 43-69. kostouros journal of applied hermeneutics 2013 article 4 15 gadamer, g. (2004). truth and method. (j. weinsheimer & d. marshall, trans). new york, ny: continuum. hall, d. (2007). paul ricoeur and the poetic imperative: the creative tension between love and justice. albany, ny: state university of new york press. kearney, r. (2002). on stories. new york, ny: routledge. kearney, r. (2004). on paul ricoeur: the owl of minerva. burlington, vt: ashgate. langdridge, d. (2004). the hermeneutic phenomenology of paul ricoeur. existential analysis 15(2), 243-255. martel, y. (1996). self. toronto, on, canada: random house. mccarthy, j. (2007). dennet and ricoeur on the narrative self. amherst, ny: prometheusbooks. muldoon, m. (2002). on ricoeur. belmont, ca: wadsworth. muldoon, m. (2006). tricks of time: bergson, merleau-ponty and ricoeur in search of time self and meaning. pittsburgh, pa: duquesne university press. pellauer, d. (2007). ricoeur: a guide for the perplexed. new york, ny: continuum. ricoeur, p. (1974). political and social essays. d. stewart & j. bien (eds). athens, oh: ohio university press. ricoeur, p. (1980). narrative time. critical inquiry, 7(1), 169-190. ricoeur, p. (1984). time and narrative (vol. 1). (k. mclaughlin & d. pellauer, trans). chicago, il: the university of chicago press. ricoeur, p. (1985). time and narrative (vol. 2). (k. mclaughlin & d. pellauer, trans). chicago, il: the university of chicago press. ricoeur, p. (1988). time and narrative (vol. 3). (k. mclaughlin & d. pellauer, trans). chicago, il: the university of chicago press. ricoeur, p. (1992). oneself as another. (k. blamey, trans). chicago, il; university of chicago press. ricoeur, p. (1998). paul ricoeur: hermeneutics and the human sciences. (j. thompson, trans). cambridge, uk: cambridge university press. ricoeur, p. (2004a). structure, word, event. (r. sweeney. trans). in d. ihde (ed.), the conflict of interpretations: essays in hermeneutics (pp.77-94). new york, ny: continuum. ricoeur (2004b). existence and hermeneutics. (k. mclaughlin, trans). in d. ihde (ed.), the conflict of interpretations: essays in hermeneutics (pp.3-24). new york, ny: continuum. ricoeur, p (2004c). memory, history, forgetting. (k. blamey & d. pellauer, trans,). chicago, il: university of chicago press. risser, j. (1986). hermeneutic experience and memory: rethinking knowledge as recollection. research in phenomenology, 16, 43-55. microsoft word newberryfinal.docx corresponding author: andrea m. newberry, faculty of social work, university of calgary email: amnewber@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics december 20, 2012 the author(s) 2012 social work and hermeneutic phenomenology andrea m. newberry abstract in this article, i discuss the connections between social work practice and interpretive approaches to knowledge building, introduce and situate hermeneutic phenomenology for novice social work researchers, and explore the fit between hermeneutic phenomenology and social work. in this paper, i also present a historical, methodological, and philosophical overview of the roots of hermeneutic/interpretive phenomenology from augustine to sartre. i advocate for the congruence between an hermeneutic approach and social work research due to its focus on inquiry as application, emphasis on the situated nature of human experiences, concept of attention to the unspoken or undisclosed, idea of the hermeneutic circle as a link between individual experiences and larger structures, fusion of horizons, and inclusion of the practitioner identity in research activities. keywords hermeneutics, interpretation, phenomenology, social work social work is interpretive and so emerges its affinity to hermeneutics and interpretive approaches to knowledge building such as hermeneutic phenomenology. in this article, i discuss the connections between social work practice and interpretive approaches to knowledge building, introduce and situate hermeneutic phenomenology for novice social work researchers, and explore the fit between hermeneutic phenomenology and social work. social work and interpretive approaches to knowledge interpretive inquiry is highly consistent with social work due to its inclusion of concepts of (situated) agency, closeness to subjects (with subjects understood as human actors), and a critical inter-subjectivity that seeks to disrupt oppressive social discourses through a hermeneutic understanding that connects newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 2 private troubles to public issues. with an ontological orientation that embraces truths over truth, and an epistemological approach emphasizing understanding and description over prediction and control (laverty, 2003), interpretive approaches allow social workers to appreciate human experiences in all their situated richness, without being compelled to make universal claims about the generalizability of findings. it is the relational, reflexive, artistic aspects of interpretative research that allow the depth and nuances of human experiences and social work interventions to really shine. human beings are subjects rather than objects and this existence of human agency means that there can be no absolute laws of human experience and behavior, as may be sought of phenomena in the natural sciences. while powerful external forces may exert themselves upon human subjects, the existential recourse to choice is ever-present, and subjects can and will respond to their environments in new and creative ways. heidegger conceptualized this poststructural understanding of choice as situated freedom, whereby human beings exercise free will in the context of their political, social, and cultural realities (lopez & willis, 2002). while recognizing factors that may influence human behavior, the social sciences must not follow the natural sciences in the pursuit of truth, generalizable to all times, places, and peoples. so critical is the belief in agency that, without it, the only role for social work would be at the macro level. social work is itself a constructed (and contested) activity (payne, 2005), in which practitioners move back and forth between the macro and the micro. despite its focus on structural issues (mullaly, 1997), social work is at the same time deeply concerned with the most intimate of human experiences. each encounter with a client (whether the client is an individual, a family, a community, or a classroom) is a new experience. in the context of working with individuals, in particular, failure to experience this newness with each new encounter alienates the social worker from the client, to whom the experience is profoundly personal. at the same time, an experienced social worker draws from the experiences of others like the client to break down walls of shame, loneliness, and hopelessness, and in doing so, situates the client’s own story in an everexpanding web of human concerns. social workers attend to each individual’s experiences, in order to honor the newness of the narrative. after understanding the clients’ narratives on their own terms (the idiographic), the social worker can reflect upon and share with the client knowledge that may be useful to the client’s own healing, and in particular that which connects private troubles to public issues, thereby reducing feelings of self-blame and isolation. the social worker is changed by each such encounter, entering the hermeneutic circle, and bringing new pre-understandings to each situation. in social work research, the social work researcher’s own prejudices (professional, experiential, and scholarly) facilitate understanding of how to apply an interpretation; in-depth knowledge of the social work field and social work education allow for suggestion of more specific and meaningful applications. in the following section, i introduce hermeneutic phenomenology in its historical, methodological, and philosophical context. this description is intended for novice social work researchers considering interpretive approaches for their work. newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 3 hermeneutic phenomenology in context phenomenology phenomenology, a philosophical approach to studying human experience, is oriented toward understanding the essence of the lived experience of a phenomenon (creswell, 2007; smith, flowers, & larkin, 2009; van manen, 1990). phenomenology has its roots in the greek words phaenesthai and logos (gearing, 2004; moustakas, 1994). phaenesthai means “to flare up, to show itself, to appear” (moustakas, 1994, p. 26); logos is reason. thus, the phenomenon is what appears in consciousness (gearing, 2004; moran, 2000; moustakas, 1994; van manen, 1990), and phenomenology is the reasoned study of what appears (gearing, 2004). hermeneutic and transcendental phenomenology. hermeneutic phenomenology is epistemologically and methodologically distinct from transcendental phenomenology, a theme i will return to later in this paper. to categorize the two traditions at a very superficial level, hermeneutic phenomenology is used to interpret the meaning of lived experiences and communicate the interpretation textually or symbolically, while transcendental phenomenology is based on discovering the objective universal essences of lived experiences and communicating them through pure description (beyer, 2011, creswell, 2007; van manen, 1990). hermeneutic phenomenology’s forefathers: a brief history from augustine to sartre hermeneutics is the tradition, theory, philosophy, and practice of interpretation (moules, 2002; smith et al., 2009). hermeneutic phenomenology, then, has its roots in both hermeneutics and phenomenology. therefore, to articulate hermeneutic phenomenology’s historical, philosophical, and methodological underpinnings, it is necessary to present the contributions of both hermeneutic and phenomenological thinkers. the hermeneutic and phenomenological projects have long and complex histories, making it difficult to identify their starting points. the word phenomenology first appeared in philosophical writing in the eighteenth century (moustakas, 1994, p. 26), and hermeneutics was introduced in theology in the seventeenth century (moules, 2002). given the scope of this paper and the need to balance breadth with depth, i have elected to start with augustine and end with sartre in the twentieth century. the inclusion of these founding influences relies on moules’s (2002) presentation of the “ancestral” roots of hermeneutic inquiry; my decision to include sartre is informed by smith et al. (2009). aurelius augustine, 354-430. the fourth/fifth-century christian bishop, theologian, and philosopher aurelius augustine had a profound effect on both heidegger’s hermeneutic phenomenology and gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics (grondin, 1991/1994). his work formed the theoretical basis for conceptions of the limits of language to express the inner world, the forgetfulness of language, and the relationship between language and tradition (grondin, 1991/1994; moules, 2002). the limits of language. according to grondin’s (1991/1994) analysis of augustine, the inner world, or “language of the heart” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 35) can never be fully expressed through language; “something more still to be said to in order to comprehend the matter fully” always remains (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 37). grondin explained augustine’s assertion that this is newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 4 because our means of communication have “something contingent or material about them” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 37). therefore, our inner worlds of experience can only be expressed imperfectly. an excessive focus on the propositional component of language contributes to this incomplete expression; for augustine, only through “embeddedness in dialogue” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 37) can language come closer to expressing our inner worlds. the power of the dialogical process is a concept developed further by gadamer in the twentieth century. phenomenology’s primary focus is on subjective, first-person experience; therefore, it is not surprising that later proponents of the phenomenological project took up language’s limitations for revealing the inner world. augustine’s work had a dual influence on later hermeneutic scholars drawing upon augustine, it became a “universal claim of hermeneutics that one can never say all that lies in inner speech” (moules, 2002, p. 4), but it was also recognized that “language is an instrument that mediates our relation to the world and to other minds” (mendelson, 2010, p. 33). language and tradition. augustine’s deliberations on language included meditations on its nominalistic nature in the greek tradition, whereby language, and propositional language in particular, has a singular and technical meaning and is therefore forgetful of itself (grondin, 1991/1994). the relationship between language and tradition, and the tradition that is carried within language, is a hermeneutic theme later picked up by gadamer, who credited augustine’s theological reflections in shaping his understanding (grondin, 1991/1994). martin luther, 1483-1546. the development of hermeneutics occurred alongside the rise of protestantism (grondin, 1991/1994; moules, 2002). german theologian martin luther had significant influence on the history of protestantism and the christian church and on the history of ideas more generally (grondin, 1991/1994). although luther’s initiatives to reform the church “laid the basis for a hermeneutic revolution . . . one might modestly inquire whether luther himself really developed a hermeneutic theory” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 40). luther’s sole professorial interest was scriptural exegesis, and he rejected philosophy as an empty scholastic pursuit (grondin, 1991/1994; moules, 2002). luther adhered to the principle of sola scriptura that is, the meaning of scripture, when read with faith and revealed through god’s grace, is selfevident and “wielded [the principle of sola scriptura] against tradition and the church’s magisterial establishment” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 40). luther’s most significant contribution to hermeneutics may have been the rejection of authority and tradition as the sole arbiters of (scriptural) meaning; four centuries later, in the twentieth century, gadamer returned to the idea of tradition and interpretation. friedrich daniel ernst schleiermacher, 1768-1834. the german theologian and philosopher friedrich schleiermacher has been credited as “one of the first to write systematically about hermeneutics as a generic form” (smith et. al, 2009, p. 22) and as “the father of contemporary hermeneutics” (moules, 2002, p. 4). he advanced an understanding of interpretation that included: the goal of determining the meaning of a text through reconstructing the intention and perspective of the author (and the possibility of understanding the author’s meaning better than he understood it himself), methods of grammatical and technical interpretation, a distinction between laxer and stricter practices of interpretation and a belief in misunnewberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 5 derstanding as the natural state from which interpretation proceeds, and clear identification of the relationship between the part and the whole (grondin, 1991/1994; moules, 2002; smith et al., 2009). reconstructed meaning. schleiermacher articulated the ideal outcome of interpretation of a text as a true reconstruction of the author’s intended meaning “what we are looking for is the very thought that the speaker wanted to express” (schleiermacher, 1809-1810, as cited in grondin, 1991/1994, p. 68). therefore, the best interpretation of a text is not that text’s meaning for the interpreter but rather the reconstructed meaning of the text from the perspective of the author achieved in its ideal form in an understanding of the author’s meaning that is superior to the author’s own. schleiermacher understood this to be an infinite task, as grondin (1991/1994) described: “the goal of understanding better, conceived in terms of an unreachable telos and the impossibility of complete understanding, bears witness to the fact that the endeavor to interpret more deeply is always worthwhile” (p. 71). grammatical and technical interpretation. for schleiermacher, grammatical interpretation involved finding the precise objective meaning of a text (as constituted by linguistic syntax), while technical (or psychological) interpretation addressed the special art employed by the author within the parameters of his linguistic tradition (grondin, 1991/1994). grammatical interpretation was therefore focused on the supraindividual linguistic patterns that shaped the text’s meaning, while technical interpretation was focused on the individuality of the text’s author (smith et al., 2009). stricter and laxer interpretation and misunderstanding as the natural state. schleiermacher differentiated between two purposes and methods of interpretation the laxer practice, which he associated with clarifying areas of textual misunderstanding (e.g., illuminating obscure scriptural passages), and the stricter practice, which assumed misunderstanding as the normal starting point against which a rigorous hermeneutics would guard at every turn (grondin, 1991/1994). schleiermacher’s assertion of misunderstanding, rather than understanding, as the natural state was one of his greatest contributions to the hermeneutic project. calling on the interpreter to question his own self-evident understandings at every stage to some degree foreshadowed husserl’s phenomenological attitude (although husserl was concerned not with the author’s intended meaning in a text but with letting objects and phenomena appear as they really are, untainted by the natural attitude). wilhelm dilthey, 1833-1911. wilhelm dilthey, a german historian and philosopher, began his study of hermeneutics after schleiermacher’s student, august bockh, introduced him to schleiermacher’s work (moules, 2002). dilthey’s conception of the human sciences as epistemologically and methodically distinct from the natural sciences and his advancement of lived experience as the basis for all understanding set the groundwork for the emergence of phenomenology. the natural versus the human sciences. dilthey advanced an epistemological and methodological distinction between the natural and human sciences (makkreel, 2012). the purpose of the natural sciences is explanation based on natural laws, dilthey asserted, while the purpose of the human sciences (the social sciences and humanities) is to develop an understanding of the meaning of history and human life (makkreel, 2012). the human sciences involve analysis of “the more complex networks of the historical newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 6 world and the actual givens of human beings” (makkreel, 2012, p. 10) rather than the artificial abstraction of mechanistic reality undertaken in the natural sciences; therefore, the laws discovered in the human sciences will always be partial and situated that is, the laws “will apply not to history in general, but to specific cultural systems or social organizations only” (makkreel, 2012, p. 10). dilthey sought to “conceptualize the human sciences as autonomous sciences and defend them from the encroachments of natural science and its methodology” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 84). lived experiences. dilthey’s focus on lived experiences was a central element of his philosophy (makkreel, 2012). in his view, lived experiences constituted selfgiven reality involving thinking, feeling, and willing (makkreel, 2012), that is, the facts of consciousness (grondin, 1991/1994). in order for the human sciences to extend knowledge beyond our own individual understandings, they “must be rooted in the original fullness and richness of our lived experience” (makkreel, 2012, p. 12). dilthey’s conceptualization of lived experienced formed the basis for the later development of phenomenology. edmund husserl, 1859-1938. transcendental phenomenology. the german mathematician and philosopher edmund husserl has been credited as “the principal founder of phenomenology” (beyer, 2011, p. 1). husserl developed transcendental phenomenology, an approach to understanding human experience that “has us focus on the essential structures that allow the objects naively taken for granted in the ‘natural attitude’ (which is characteristic of both our everyday life and ordinary science) to ‘constitute themselves’ in consciousness” (beyer, 2011, p. 3). transcendental phenomenology, meant to be a “rigorous science,” was husserl’s response to science’s neglect of the “specifically human questions” (husserl, 1954/1970, p. 7). understanding husserl’s transcendental phenomenology requires an appreciation of his theories about the life-world, the intentionality of consciousness, the natural and phenomenological attitudes, eidetic reduction, phenomenological reduction, and intersubjectivity, each of which i will discuss briefly in turn. husserl, who converted to protestantism in adulthood, was the son of non-orthodox jews. he was persecuted in nazi germany, losing his professorship and access to the university library (zahavi, 2003). more than 40,000 pages of husserl’s manuscripts were rescued and removed from germany by franciscan herman leo van breda after husserl’s death in 1938 (beyer, 2011; zahavi, 2003). unfortunately, almost the entire first printing of a posthumously published work was destroyed (zahavi, 2003). the life-world. the life-world, or lebenswelt, as originally conceptualized by husserl, is the pre-reflective, pre-theoretical world of everyday experience, and it is this world of immediate lived experience that is the focus of his transcendental phenomenology (van manen, 1990). the life-world is prescientific, and therefore stands in contrast to the scientific world: in our prescientific experience, the world is given concretely, sensuously, and intuitively. in contrast, the scientific world is a system of idealities that in principle transcend sensuous experience. whereas the lifeworld is a world of situated, relative truths, science seeks to realize an idea about strict and objective knowledge that is freed from every relation to the subjective first-person perspective. whereas the objects in the newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 7 lifeworld are characterized by their relative, approximate, and proximal givenness . . . the objects of science are characterized as relative, nonperspectival, univocal, and exact. (zahavi, 2003, pp. 126–127) the life-world, as the world of subjective human experience, forms the foundation for scientific ways of knowing (encyclopedia britannica, 2012). husserl’s transcendental phenomenology advanced the lifeworld as a legitimate focus for scientific inquiry. the intentional nature of consciousness. husserl wrote that all consciousness is directed, whether to real or unreal objects in the world (gubrium & holstein, 2000; zahavi, 2003), with the exception of nonintentional “units of consciousness” such as pain (beyer, 2011). intentional consciousness is always attached to an object in the world: “perception, thought, judgment, fantasy, doubt, expectation, or recollection, all of these diverse forms of consciousness are characterized by intending objects . . . the perceived, doubted, expected object” (zahavi, 2003, p. 14). husserl therefore asserted that to understand the nature of consciousness we must also analyze the object to which consciousness is directed (zahavi, 2003). for example, considering the fantasy of a unicorn, we cannot fully understand the form of consciousness that is “fantasy of a unicorn” without analyzing the intended object that is, the essence (or the horizons) of the unicorn (i.e., a unicorn is an imaginary animal; the unicorn is like a horse while not being a horse, etc.). the objects to which consciousness is directed are transcendent more than the “perspectival and horizontal givenness of the object” (zahavi, 2003, p. 95) as perceived or imagined by the subject. zahavi (2003) gives the chair as an example one cannot view the chair from the front and back simultaneously, but nonetheless the chair’s horizons include all of the possible appearances of the chair. the idea of perspectival and transcendent horizons is important in the development of the hermeneutic phenomenological project and must be considered an important influence on gadamer’s later theory on the fusion of horizons. the natural and phenomenological attitudes. the natural attitude is associated with everyday experience (smith et al., 2009). the natural attitude includes many features of our everyday internal worlds, such as our preconceptions, assumptions, constructions, internal beliefs, ego experiences, biases, culture, and judgments (gearing, 2004); and our “practical concerns, folk assumptions, and smattering of scientific knowledge” (zahavi, 2003, p. 11). husserl’s goal was to transcend the “naivety and fallacy of the natural attitude and to move, employing the classic greek dichotomy, from a naive doxa to an episteme, to philosophy as a ‘rigorous science’” (luft, 1998). the phenomenological attitude involves a disengagement from the natural attitude and a reflexive turn “as we turn our gaze from . . . objects in the world, and direct it inward, toward our perception of those objects” (smith et. al., 2009). husserl asserted that in order to objectively analyze the structure and content of consciousness, we must suspend the natural attitude; he developed eidetic and phenomenological reduction to support this “alteration of viewpoint” (zahavi, 2003, p. 11). eidetic reduction. eidetic reduction is an analysis aimed at elucidating the essential properties of an object or experience, those essences without which the object or experience would become something other than the object or experience it is (zahavi, 2003). for example, what are the essential qualities newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 8 that make a tree a tree, rather than a different type of organism altogether? eidetic reduction is intended to uncover the “invariant properties” that transcend the “subjective perception of individual manifestations of that type of object” (smith et al., 2009, p. 14). as a case in point, if i see a white tree, does that mean that to be a tree means to be white? or is whiteness a non-essential variant of being a tree that is, a subjective perception of an individual manifestation of being a tree? phenomenological reduction. phenomenological reduction involves the temporary suspension of preconceptions regarding the phenomena under study and is perhaps the most controversial facet of husserl’s phenomenology. this suspension of presuppositions, called the phenomenological epoche, facilitates “seeing things as they appear . . . returning to the things themselves” (moustakas, 1994, p. 90). phenomenological reduction is achieved through “bracketing” the “taken-for-granted world” (smith et. al, 2009, p. 15) in order to study the essences of phenomena (creswell, 2007). bracketing is a mathematical idea, in which bracketed content within an equation is treated separately (smith et. al., 2009); bracketing in phenomenology means to treat the natural attitude towards an object or experience separately from the phenomenological analysis so that the phenomenon can reveal itself “free of prejudgments and preconceptions” (moustakas, 1994, p. 90). subsequent philosophers such as heidegger and gadamer challenged the feasibility and desirability of bracketing in phenomenological inquiry. intersubjectivity. husserl articulated a complex theoretical model of intersubjectivity. husserl’s conceptualization of intersubjectivity was embodied, experiential, and constitutive (zahavi, 2003). according to husserl, it is through our own embodied subjectivity that we are able to recognize another’s embodied subjectivity as zahavi stated in his analysis of husserl, “it is exactly the unique subject-object status of my body that permits me to recognize another body as a foreign embodied subjectivity” (p. 113). additionally, according to zahavi’s interpretation of husserl, we each understand the other experientially and without access to the other person’s first-person subjectivity: “had i the same access to the consciousness of the other as i have to my own, the other would have ceased being an other and instead have become a part of myself” (zahavi, 2003, p. 114). this point is critical to husserl’s theory of constituting intersubjectivity; the transcendent world (i.e., the objective world) is only made available through intersubjectivity that is: objects cannot be reduced to being merely my intentional correlates if they can be experienced by others as well. the intersubjective experienceability of the object guarantees its real transcendence, so my experience (constitution) of transcendent objects is necessarily mediated by my experience of its givenness for another transcendent subject, that is, by my experience of a foreign worlddirected subject. (grondin, 1991/1994, pp. 115–116) husserl’s student heidegger also takes up intersubjectivity later in the phenomenological project. martin heidegger, 1889-1976. german philosopher martin heidegger was a student of husserl’s who aimed to extend the phenomenological project “heidegger’s approach to phenomenology is often taken to mark the move away from the transcendental project, and to set out the beginnings of the hermeneutic and existential emphases in phenomenological philosophy” (smith et al., newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 9 2009, p. 16). heidegger acknowledged husserl as a formative intellectual influence (smith et al., 2009), while husserl eventually publicly repudiated heidegger’s phenomenology, even referring to him as his antipode (beyer, 2011). key facets of heidegger’s phenomenology included an interpretive stance, a focus on being-in-theworld (dasein), the hermeneutic circle, visible and hidden meanings, and, later in his philosophical career, the role of languageeach of which i will discuss in turn. heidegger’s involvement with national socialism cannot be overlooked in phenomenology’s historical context, and so i will deal briefly with this significant shadow on the phenomenological project as well. interpretive stance. while husserl envisioned a phenomenology that would transcend the natural attitude of everyday life, including our prejudgments about phenomena, heidegger “questioned the possibility of any knowledge outside of an interpretive stance, whilst grounding this stance in the lived world-the world of things, people, relationships and language” (smith et al., 2009, p. 16). for heidegger, one’s foreconceptions, consisting of “prior experiences, assumptions, [and] preconceptions” (smith et al, 2009, p. 25) are brought to each new encounter. simultaneously extending and challenging husserl’s advancement of intentional consciousness, heidegger rejected the possibility of pure reflection because reflection, as a form of consciousness, is “intentional, and therefore never completely separated from the world” (levasseur, 2003, p. 414). dasein. husserl’s transcendental phenomenology was primarily focused on what can be: broadly classified as individual psychological processes, such as perception, awareness and consciousness. in contrast, heidegger is more concerned with the ontological question of existence itself, and with the practical activities and relationships which we are caught up in, and through which the world appears to us, and is made meaningful. (smith et al., 2009, pp. 16-17) therefore, heidegger’s philosophy revived “the ontology of the subject” (moules, 2002, p. 7). the subject of heidegger’s life work, being and time (1962/1927) is “there-being” (dasein), where dasein is the “uniquely situated” quality of ‘human being’” (smith et al., 2009, p. 16). heidegger asserted that dasein is fundamentally relational (intersubjective) dasein is being-with (smith et al, 2009). even being alone is being-with, albeit in a deficient way (smith et al., 2009). heidegger viewed death, and the resulting finiteness and uncertainty of being, as giving dasein a temporal dimension (smith et al., 2009). although dasein is fundamentally being-with, death is significant in that it is faced alone (smith et al., 2009). the nature of dasein presented a fundamental challenge to husserl’s presuppositionless phenomenological project-with dasein involving “the inherently social being who already operates with a pre-theoretical grasp of the a priori structures that make possible particular modes of being” (wheeler, 2011, p. 7). in opposition to husserl’s conception of the phenomenological reduction and the phenomenological epoche, heideggerian philosophy maintains that given the nature of our dasein, “we are unable to completely bracket prior conceptions and knowledge we are necessarily embedded in a historical context” (levasseur, 2003, p. 415). in heideggerian phenomenology, bracketing is considered a specious project (levasseur, 2003). heidegger further develnewberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 10 oped his theory on the role of preunderstanding (fore-conceptions) in his formulation of the hermeneutic circle. hermeneutic circle. the idea of the hermeneutic circle did not originate with heidegger, but it took on new meaning in his philosophy. whereas the hermeneutic circle was previously conceptualized in terms of the relationship between the whole of a text and its parts, or between text and tradition, with heidegger the hermeneutic circle becomes an “existential task with which each of us is confronted” (ramberg & gjesdal, 2009, p. 15). the hermeneutic circle involves an ever-increasing development of understanding as we revise our preunderstandings in light of new experiences: in the hermeneutic circle, we make progress toward sense and meaning by questioning prior knowledge, thus expanding into new horizons of meanings. yet, we never fully arrive, because to arrive would merely represent another stage of pre-understanding. instead, each turn in the circle opens new horizons and possibilities yet resists dogmatic conclusions, because the ongoing project of reflective questions keeps the possibility of new experiences and possibilities alive. (levasseur, 2003, p. 418) according to heidegger, our foreconceptions are necessary prerequisites to new understanding; all interpretations (and all understanding involves interpretation) flow from our presuppositions. appearance-the visible and the hidden. heidegger was interested in what it means for a phenomenon to appear-as explained by smith et al. (2009): “to say something appears suggests that it is entering a new state, as it is coming forth, presenting itself to us and in contrast to a previous state, where it was not present” (p. 24). this is clearly connected to heidegger’s interpretive stance and rejection of a presuppositionless phenomenology; this viewpoint on appearance suggests we cannot view phenomena objectively, because every time we view a phenomenon it appears anew. heidegger was also interested in what is not made visible in the appearance of phenomena what is hidden or concealed (smith et al., 2009). therefore, for heidegger, phenomenological investigation must consider both the manifest and the latent qualities of phenomena as they are revealed (smith et al., 2009). this idea has had important implications for hermeneutic phenomenology, and suggests, for example, that phenomenologists studying accounts of human experience must be alert to both what is being said and what is not being said about an experience. this is in contrast to husserl’s approach, in which the phenomenologist suspends the natural attitude and tries to see only what an object or phenomenon really is. a phenomenologist cannot identify what is not being revealed without recourse to his or her foreconceptions further differentiating heidegger’s interest in the latent content of appearances from a husserlian approach. language. grondin (1991/1994) observed a conscious movement in heidegger’s work towards the importance of language in being. in his later work, heidegger speaks more empathically of language as the “house of being,” yet his beliefs about the limits of language remain (grondin, 1991/1994). reminiscent of augustine, heidegger argued in the final words of the lecture considered to mark the end point of his thought: it is inescapably necessary to overcome the obstacles which make such a saying [of experience] obviously inadequate. newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 11 even the saying that occurs in the form of lecture remains an obstacle of this kind. its saying has been only in propositions. (heidegger, 1969, as cited in grondin, 1991/1994, p. 102) while heidegger gives increasing credence to the role of language in being, he also echoes augustine’s assertion that language is always an inadequate interpretation of inner experience. the importance of language in the hermeneutic phenomenological project is developed more deeply in gadamerian philosophy. heidegger and national socialism. accounts of heidegger’s philosophical work sometimes make mention of his nazi affiliations and sometimes do not. while some scholars present his philosophical ideas without reference to his nazi involvement, others believe his political activities were intimately tied to his philosophical project: everyone-great thinkers included-is capable of errors of political judgment, even egregious ones. however, the more one learns about the heidegger/national socialism nexus, the more one is ineluctably driven to conclude the philosopher himself perceived his nazi involvements not as a random course of action, but as a logical outgrowth of his philosophical doctrines. . . . as a concrete exemplification of eigentliches dasein or authentic existence.” (wolin, 1988, p. 136) while heidegger has been alternately held accountable and exonerated by scholars, the nature and meaning of his nazi involvement remains controversial, especially as it relates to his philosophy. it is fairly well accepted that he was a member of the national socialist party during his rectorship at freiburg university-during which time he gave pro-nazi speeches, eliminated democratic structures within the university, and initiated an end to financial aid for jewish students (peters, 2009). after the war, heidegger was investigated by the denazification committee at freiburg university and banned from teaching until 1949; in 1950 he was made professor emeritus (wheeler, 2011). scholarly attempts to exonerate heidegger have been challenged by the absence of any clear and complete repudiation of national socialism in his later works (wheeler, 2011). heidegger’s nazi involvement cast a shadow over more than heideggerian phenomenology, tainting the phenomenological project more generally (c.f. holmes, 1996). how are we to understand heideggerian phenomenology in light of heidegger’s national socialist activities? wheeler (2011) suggested: it would be irresponsible to ignore the relationship between heidegger’s philosophy and his politics. but it is surely possible to be critically engaged in a deep and intellectually stimulating way with his sustained investigation into being, to find much of value in his capacity to think deeply about human life, to struggle fruitfully with what he says about our loss of dwelling, and to appreciate his massive and still unfolding contribution to thought and to thinking, without looking for evidence of nazism in every twist and turn of the philosophical path he lays down. (pp. 91-92) while the relationship between heidegger’s philosophy and national socialism will likely remain controversial, his philosophical insights continue to influence the phenomenological project today. hans-georg gadamer, 1900–2002. the german philosopher hans-georg gadamer was a student of both husserl and heidegger (moules, 2002). his work is newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 12 known as philosophical hermeneutics, which is focused on understanding and interpretation rather than methodology (moules, 2002). key themes in gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics include methodology and the human sciences, language and conversation, understanding and application, history, and the restoration of prejudice (grondin, 1991/1994, moules, 2002). methodology and the human sciences. gadamer questioned whether acquisition of methods unique to the human sciences was a necessary prerequisite to the human sciences securing legitimate science status, and even whether methodology could be the sole arbiter of validity (grondin, 1991/1994). the hermeneutic task in relation to the human sciences is therefore not to develop a methodology for correct interpretation, but to “demonstrate the untenability of the idea of universally valid knowledge” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 107). the human sciences deal with a different type of truth than the natural sciences, and are better suited to a humanistic discourse than is the methodological, objectifying discourse of the natural sciences (grondin, 1991/1994). moules (2002) described gadamer’s interpretation of truth as “the event of meaning, rather than something of objectivity of repetition. to say that we uncover truth in understanding simply means that we have found a meaningful account that corresponds to experience” (p. 11). language and dialogue. language occupies a central place in gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. gadamer asserted that understanding is not something possessed by the individual, but rather something that emerges through participation in “meaning, tradition, and ultimately a dialogue” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 119). for gadamer, language and interpretation in the human sciences are understood in a dialogical, question-and-response framework because “to understand a text or an event is to understand it as a reply to a question” (grondin, 1999/2003, p. 125). here gadamer returns to augustine’s delimitations of propositional language, in comparison to the greater expressive potential of language embedded in the dialogical process. gadamer devoted significant space in his writing to reflecting on the nature of true conversation, both in form and purpose. genuine conversation, to gadamer, does not involve competing for the supremacy of one’s opinion; likewise, it is not a summative process in which one viewpoint is added to another (gadamer, 1970/2007). the focus of genuine conversation remains on the topic, and the conversational partners hold this topic in common (gadamer 1970/2007). for gadamer, “genuine conversation transforms the viewpoint of both. . . . [and] involves the shared interpretation of the world which makes moral and social solidarity possible” (gadamer, 1970/2007, p. 96). exploring a topic with a conversational partner in order to come to a better understanding of that topic’s meaning has been taken up as an interviewing strategy in hermeneutic phenomenology along with more traditional strategies aimed at soliciting experiential accounts (van manen, 1990). gadamer’s theory of fusion of horizons relates to both the expansion of understanding that emerges between dialogical partners in genuine conversation and the enlargement of knowledge that arises when an interpreter interacts with a text. in each case, each party (whether a person or a text) possesses its own horizon of understanding, and in a fusion of horizons, they merge to create a new, more expansive understanding of the topic (gadamer, 1977/2007). gadamer’s fusion of horizons has important implications for interpretive interviewers, because it suggests newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 13 the greatest knowledge will be created when both parties in a conversation actively contribute to creating meaning, rather than when the interviewer assumes an objective stance so as not to “taint” the findings or influence the interviewee. understanding and application. rather than approaching interpretation as a purely epistemological or intellectual pursuit, and application of interpretation as occurring after the fact (e.g., jurisprudence), gadamer conceptualized “understanding and application as indivisibly fused” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 115). understanding always involves “applying a meaning to our situation, to the questions we want answered” (grondin, 1991/1994, p. 115). central to the act of interpretation is the application of a past text or event to the present (grondin, 1999/2003), an application that is influenced by tradition, history, and custom-so that application becomes an extension of the dialogical search for meaning that precedes the interpreter (grondin, 1991/1994). history. as human beings, gadamer asserted, we are deeply rooted in history-or, as grondin (1991/1994) explained, “we belong to history more than history belongs to us” (p. 116). this means that that our knowledge of history or even of our own historical determinism is always less than the actual workings of history in our lives (grondin, 1999/2003). when writing about the role of history in interpretation, gadamer used the german word wirkungsgeschichte, a word that has proven difficult to translate into english (grondin 1999/2003). grondin (1999/2003) defended “the work of history” as the best translation-“the notion of work gives us a better idea that history is active in us, works in us or penetrates us, to a greater extent than knowledge can penetrate and suspect” (p. 92). in the human sciences, one of gadamer’s principles of the work of history involves the historiography of the topic (grondin, 1999/2003). every topic or research question, no matter how seemingly novel, is part of a larger history of interpretation-“a subject, a problematic, an interrogation will always be inscribed in a tradition, in a debate, of which we must take note” (grondin, 1999/2003, p. 93). the presentation of the historiography of a topic is common practice in the human sciences, usually taking the form of a review of literature leading to the research question (grondin, 1999/2003). prejudice. gadamer argued for the idea of prejudice to be restored to its preenlightenment meaning, before it acquired the negative associations it carries today that of erroneous, unjustified beliefs (gadamer, 1965/2007). in gadamer’s view, “prejudices are biases of our openness to the world. they are simply conditions whereby we experience something whereby what we encounter says something to us” (gadamer, 1965/2007, p. 82). gadamer captured the importance of this concept by saying, “it is not so much our judgments as it is our prejudices that constitute our being” (gadamer, 1965/2007, p. 82). this insight is fertile for understanding hermeneutic phenomenology the researcher’s ability to attend to a phenomenon and draw conclusions about it will necessarily be mediated by his or her prejudices (or pre-judgments). consider, for example, a hermeneutic phenomenologist studying anxiety how would he or she know to inquire about the embodied experience of anxiety unless he or she had prior knowledge (prejudices) concerning anxiety and physical symptoms? in this way, our prejudices will always shape our judgments. jean-paul sartre, 1905-1980. the french philosopher jean-paul sartre continnewberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 14 ued heidegger’s project of existential phenomenology, emphasizing our selfconsciousness and drive for meaning, which is expressed actively in the world through our projects (smith et al., 2009); sartre’s persistent concern with our being-in-the world (dasein) as mediated through our practical concerns (i.e., our projects) continued heidegger’s pragmatic philosophical approach to human experience (flynn, 2011). a few key components of sartre’s philosophy are particularly informative for the hermeneutic phenomenological project: human concern for becoming over being, nothingness, the direction of perception, and freedom (smith et al., 2009). concern for becoming over being. for sartre, human beings are preoccupied with our potential future selves, what smith et al. (2009) describe as “concern with what we will be, rather than what we are” (p. 19). human beings are constantly in process, and “the self is not a pre-existing unity to be discovered, but an ongoing project to be unfurled” (smith et al., 2009, p. 19). the hermeneutic phenomenologist is concerned with the projects taken on by human actors projects that are “embodied, interpersonal, affective and moral” (smith et al., 2009, p. 21). nothingness. sartre, reminiscent of heidegger’s visible and invisible in the appearance of phenomena, was concerned with what he called nothingness, that is, the equal importance of what is absent with what is present in “defining who we are and how we see the world” (smith et al., 2009, p. 19). if we are equally defined by the absent in existential phenomenology, the phenomenologist must consider what might be missing from any account of experience. for example, is belongingness what is absent in an account of loneliness? the direction of perception. we do not pursue our projects in a world that belongs only to us, and our relatedness to others shapes our perceptions of the world (smith et al., 2009). the direction of perception is a dual process encompassing both how the world changes as we perceive others in it, and how it changes us as we perceive ourselves being perceived within the world (smith et al., 2009). sartre’s extension of heidegger’s concept of worldliness to include personal and social relationships, and of experience as “contingent upon the presence and absence of our relationships to other people . . . is perhaps the clearest glimpse of what a phenomenological analysis of the human condition can look like” (smith et al., 2009, p. 20). freedom. existentialism emphasizes the freedom and responsibility of human beings to choose what they will become, but this freedom is situated in the complex biographical and social content of individual action (smith et al., 2009). sartre’s freedom is a salient reminder that human beings are subjects who actively interpret and construct the world (see also mead, 1962). social work and hermeneutic phenomenology i encourage social work researchers to consider hermeneutic phenomenology as an appropriate methodology for knowledge building in the discipline. several features of hermeneutic phenomenology seem especially suited to social work research, including its focus on inquiry as application, emphasis on the situated nature of human experiences, concept of attention to the unspoken or undisclosed, idea of the hermeneutic circle as a link between individual experiences and larger structures, fusion of horizons, and inclusion of the practitioner identity in research activities. newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 15 social work is an applied discipline with a focus on social justice, the pursuit of which is an obligation included in the code of ethics for canadian social workers (canadian association of social workers, 2005). according to davey (2006), “understanding does not merely interpret the world but changes it” (p. xiv). therefore, it is appropriate to include a focus on praxis in interpretation in social work research. madison (1990) stated “a good understanding will be “suggestive” or fertile in that it raises questions that stimulate further research and interpretation” (p. 30). heidegger used the term dasein (therebeing) to emphasize the profoundly situated nature of human experience and the relationships and activities from which experience and meaning emerge (smith et al., 2009). social work is a highly situated endeavor, composed of a complex web of relational, structural, practical, and axiological concerns; heidegger’s dasein is therefore a much more generative image for social work researchers than husserl’s pre-reflective lebenswelt. additionally, a hermeneutic approach allows engagement with participants in a meaningful way clarifying, wondering, and trying out interpretations in a way that creates a broader horizon of understanding than a strictly objective approach. utilizing a hermeneutic phenomenological approach allows the social work researcher to attend to what is unspoken, as well as what is spoken, and in doing so to invite the shadow side of social work back into the interpretation. many experiences where social work is situated involve pain and shame, and are not easily talked about in the larger societal discourse experiences such as trauma, mental health challenges, and abuse. most social workers are skilled in listening for both what is not said about these experiences as well as what is said an approach that can be extended into research activities. like social work, hermeneutic inquiry requires researchers to operate from a position of closeness to, and great sympathy with, their research participants and, at a deeper level, their human conditions of which the (social worker) researcher is an acknowledged part. detachment from clients may be a marker of burnout in social workers, and a willingness to enter into clients’ life worlds in a way that eases pain and facilitates positive change is required of social workers. entering with clients this way, often acting as a witness to both the darkest and most life-giving experiences of human life, changes the social worker in some very fundamental way. the committed social worker will enter again, and again, and again into these places, coming out each time as someone at least slightly changed. as social workers and clients bring their personal and practice experiences to each encounter, so too are they changed by each other a hermeneutic circle. social workers bring all of their humanness to their work with clients. the social worker’s own humanity is the foundation of all he or she will achieve as a helper, advocate, and witness. social constructionist perspectives, which are consistent with hermeneutic inquiry, recognize the socially constructed nature of reality and the inter-subjectivity of knowledge. the inter-subjectivity of the social worker and client is mirrored in the inter-subjectivity of researcher and participant. this “fusion of horizons,” as expressed by gadamer, refers to the fluid meanings, ideas, and experiences of participants, which are situated in a changing historical context (lopez & willis, 2004). much of social work practice, whether in a clinical, community, or educational contexts, is concerned with making sense of, and often newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 16 transforming, painful social experiences (i.e., disrupting oppressive discourses). the hermeneutic approach extends these sensemaking activities to the research realm. cocreation of meaning is central to this approach. action is at the heart of social work social work is an applied discipline focused on change. in order for real change to happen, we must first create a different set of meanings about the situations we find ourselves in, and then take action to transform those situations. some narratives are more limiting than others, and social workers work with clients and the public to question limiting narratives and co-create new ways of understanding private troubles and public issues. as clients may be changed by their work with social workers, so too are social workers changed, often irrevocably, by their work with clients. the social worker, forging yet another professional identity as a researcher, cannot and should not shed the earlier practitioner self. the emergence of the novice social work researcher is another interpretative process in the web of self and profession, in which it is not enough to acquire technical competence. rather, the novice researcher is called to explore the values of their work and the values of the research endeavor to arrive at a beginning place of congruence and commitment. once again, a new self emerges from the old. note the joseph-armand bombardier doctoral scholarship from the social sciences and humanities research council provides support for the author’s research and scholarship. references beyer, c. (2011). edmund husserl. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (winter 2011 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/husserl/ canadian association of social workers. (2005). code of ethics. retrieved from canadian association of social workers website: http://www.casw-acts.ca/ creswell, j. w. (2007). qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). thousand oaks, ca: sage. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: state university of new york press. flynn, t. (2011). jean-paul sartre. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (spring 2012 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sartre/ gadamer, h. g. (1960/1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). (j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h. g. (1965/2007). the universality of the hermeneutical problem. (d. e. linge, trans.). in the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (r. e. palmer, ed.)(pp. 72-88). evanston, il: northwestern university press. gadamer, h. g. (1970/2007). language and understanding. (r. e. palmer, trans.). in the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (r. e. palmer, ed.) (pp. 89-107). evanston, il: northwestern university press. gadamer, h. g. (1977/2007). classical and philosophical hermeneutics. (r. e. palmer, trans.). in the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (r. e. palmer, ed.) (pp. newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 17 41-71). evanston, il: northwestern university press. gearing, r. e. (2004). bracketing in research: a typology. qualitative health research, 14(1), 1429–1452. doi: 10.1177/1049732304270394 grondin, j. (1991/1994). introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. (j. weinsheimer, trans.). new haven, ct: yale university press. grondin, j. (1999/2003). the philosophy of gadamer. (k. plant, trans.). montreal, qc, canada: mcgill-queen’s university press. gubrium, j. f., & holstein, j. a. (2000). analyzing interpretive practice. in n. k. denzin & y. s. lincoln (eds.), handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 487–508). thousand oaks, ca: sage. holmes, c. a. (1996). the politics of phenomenological concepts in nursing. journal of advanced nursing, 24(3), 579–587. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.22719.x husserl, e. (1954/1970). the crisis of the european sciences and transcendental phenomenology. (d. carr, trans.). evanston, il: northwestern university press. laverty, s. m. (2003). hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. international journal of qualitative methods, 2(3), 21–35. retrieved from: http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php /ijqm/index levasseur, j. j. (2003). the problem of bracketing in phenomenology. qualitative health research, 13(3), 408–420. doi: 10.1177/1049732302250337 life-world. (2012). in encyclopedia britannica. retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/ebchecked/topic /340330/life-world lopez, k. a., & willis, d. g. (2004). descriptive versus interpretative phenomenology: their contributions to nursing knowledge. qualitative health research, 14(5), 726–735. doi: 10.1177/1049732304263638. luft. s. (1998). husserl’s phenomenological discovery of the natural attitude. continental philosophy review, 31(2), 153–170. doi: 10.1023/a:1010034512821 madison, g. b. (1990). the hermeneutics of post-modernity: figures and themes. indiana, il: university of indiana press. makkreel, r. (2012). wilhelm dilthey. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2012 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dilthey/ mead, g. h. (1962). mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. chicago, il: university of chicago press. mendelson, m. (2010). saint augustine. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (winter 2010 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/augustine/ moran, d. (2000). introduction to phenomenology. london, england: routledge. moules, n. j. (2002). hermeneutic inquiry: paying heed to history and hermes. an ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. international journal of qualitative methods, 1(3), 1–40. retrieved from newberry journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 14 18 http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php /ijqm/index moustakas, c. (1994). phenomenological research methods. thousand oaks, ca: sage. mullaly, b. (1997). structural social work (2nd ed.). don mills, ontario, canada: oxford university press. payne, m. (2005). modern social work theory (3rd ed.). chicago, il: lyceum books. peters, m. a. (2009). editorial: heidegger, phenomenology, education. educational philosophy and theory, 41(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00516.x ramberg, b., & gjesdal, k. (2009). hermeneutics. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2009 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hermeneutic s/ smith, j. a., flowers, p., & larkin, m. (2009). interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. london, on, canada: sage. van manen, m. (1990). researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. london, england: the althouse press. wheeler, m. (2011). martin heidegger. in e. n. zalta (ed.), the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2009 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger/ wolin, r. (1988). the french heidegger debate. new german critique, 45, 135–161. retrieved from http://ngc.dukejournals.org zahavi, d. (2003). husserl’s phenomenology. stanford, ca: stanford university press. microsoft word jardine editorial corrected proof.docx corresponding author: dr. david w. jardine email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 24, 2024 ©the author(s) 2014 guest editorial this is why we read. this is why we write david w. jardine discussion bears fruit. the participants part from one another as changed beings. the individual perspectives with which they entered upon the discussion have been transformed, and so they have been transformed themselves. this, then, is a kind of progress—not the progress proper to research but rather a progress that always must be renewed in the effort of our living. h.g. gadamer (2007, p. 244) from hermeneutics as a practical philosophy. in response to reading jodi latremouille’s “my treasured relation,” christine mciver, ceo and founder of kid’s cancer care foundation of alberta who lost her son, derek, to cancer, sent the following email to dr. nancy moules, this journal’s editor: the piece by jodi latremouille. i read a lot of this stuff, so much it’s in danger of becoming a blur. this is exceptional. i am going to share it with our staff if that is okay. she writes exactly how i think. in paragraphs full of description and illustration – and then words that hit the moment. i was surprised at the moment of shelby’s death, i was overcome again with the very same pain and sadness as when derek died. this writing…it is so good. illustrates the journey perfectly. it needs to be seen. there is, here, something deeply recognizable to those of us who work with the living and the dying and the dead, something that nebulously defines being part of a profession. it is something we need to admit because its admission is a vehicle to its remedy—“ a progress that always must be renewed in the effort of our living.” there is a certain ennui here, something like having experienced too much, having seemingly heard it all before, something like the exhaustion of efforts to name this pain, this suffering, and how language itself seems to start to wear thin and then wear on you over time, wear you out. this is the secret lot of nurses and teachers, of parents and doctors--perhaps a secret lot of being human itself. the effort of our living can lose its power jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 editorial 1 2 to renew. we can become halt and the glow of language that once bound us together in commiseration can burn out, and us with it. we lose our avail. i’m reminded of this passage from david g. smith: “education is suffering from narration-sickness,” says paulo freire. it speaks out of a story, which was once full of enthusiasm, but now shows itself incapable of a surprise ending. the nausea of narration-sickness comes from having heard enough, of hearing many variations on a theme but no new theme. (smith, 1999, pp. 135-136) why do we write emails in response to reading jodi latremouille’s work? why am i compelled to write about earth cousins and now this little editorial? this compulsion is part of why attention is given in truth and method (gadamer, 1989, p. 60) to “[immanuel] kant's doctrine of the heightening of the feeling of life (lebensgefühl).” despite gadamer's detailed caveats about this notion, it is one of the deep sources of hermeneutic work, percolating up through husserl's ideas of lived experience and the life world. part of the orbit of hermeneutic research is to revive in writers and readers the possibilities of our commiseration. hans-georg gadamer (1986, p. 59) called it the opening up of “free spaces” and learning, in consequence, how we might then shape our lives in light of such possibilities, forging, if you will, “new solidarities” (p. 59). this, then, is the other clue i got from christine's email about why we read, why we write, why this journal--the hit, the moment. this is the aesthesis of aesthetics, as james hillman (2006, p. 36) noted, “which means at root a breathing in or taking in of the world, the gasp, “aha,” the “uh” of the breath in wonder, shock, amazement, and aesthetic response.” hermeneutics lingers about the in-breath where something hits us and wakes us up out of our melancholia over the wearying sameness of things. it is where our living can become spacious and open and full of possibility again, and we no longer feel locked into the often-panicky confines and immediacies of our circumstances. this, too, is why some writing can be properly called beautiful, that is, precipitating of such aesthetic arrival even when it speaks of sad departure. references gadamer, h.g. (1986). the idea of the university--yesterday, today, tomorrow. in d. misgeld & g. nicholson (eds. & trans.), hans-georg gadamer on education, poetry, and history: applied hermeneutics (pp. 47-62). albany, ny: suny press. gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed., j. weinsheimer & d.g marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. gadamer, h.g. (2007). hermeneutics as practical philosophy. in r.e. palmer (ed.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings (pp. 227-245). evanston, il: northwestern university press. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 editorial 1 3 hillman, j. (2006). anima mundi: returning the soul to the world. in j. hillman, city and soul (pp. 27-49). putnam, ct: spring. smith, d.g. (1999). pedagon: interdisciplinary essays on pedagogy and culture. new york, ny: peter lang. microsoft word editorial moules (1).docx corresponding author: nancy j. moules, phd email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics june 8, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 editorial: following good leads nancy j. moules in publishing the serialization of dr. williamson’s the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery in the journal of applied hermeneutics in an unfolding of five installments, i have followed an interesting adventure, a mystery full of excitement, turns, breath-holding, unconcealments, and phenomenological pauses. there were many reasons that i invited and welcomed dr. williamson’s showcasing of his doctoral thesis in this journal in this particular format as exemplary of applied hermeneutics. however beyond my initial intentions, i am reflective of the results and implications it has had for me in my own thinking about doctoral hermeneutic research and of my own hermeneutic research. in no small part, it has reminded me of the necessary task in hermeneutics of following good leads. i first learned of dr. williamson’s proposal to present his hermeneutic study in the form of a hard-boiled detective novel through his doctoral supervisor, dr. jim field, who subsequently invited me to join john’s supervisory committee. the idea was exciting to me, provocative, creative, energetic and “dangerous” if it was poorly done. it was not. however, it did invoke a different sense of danger, a danger that is inherent in applied hermeneutic research a hermeneutic wager to take a risk. the danger i speak of here lies in the idea that when the work is done well, it involves unconcealment it is disquieting, disruptive, and evocative. john’s work is an example of applied hermeneutics: interpretation and understanding taken to practice, applied to a topic, and taking the wager to deconstruct and then re-construct. as professor hodge wrote in his eloquent editorial (hodge, 2016), this work is a reminder that hermeneutic work does not have to always be presented in the traditional thesis style but, if it is moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 5 2 presented differently, it has to be done well. it has to maintain scholarship, integrity, rigor, and an intellectual facility that cannot be “played with” in the sense of just having “fun for fun’s sake” as opposed to the carefulness of play in a gadamerian sense, where “the primacy of play over the consciousness of the player is fundamentally acknowledged” (gadamer 1960/2004, p. 105, italics in original). for gadamer, the significance of play is that when one is fully involved in play, it takes one outside of oneself and the game becomes more than a subjective experience. play at the same time requires seriousness to be properly absorbing but also frees the player into responsiveness to the flow of the game. play is not random: it has rules, participants, and a field of play but its possible outcome is open. (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015, pp. 42-43) the play in john’s applied hermeneutics is playfully serious. as i mentioned in a footnote of the first editorial for this work, dr. williamson won the 2015 university of calgary chancellor’s graduate medal and he won it for a reason. the work is taken seriously. the conceptualization and execution of a hermeneutic study presented in the form of a hardboiled detective novel did a remarkable mirroring of the topic itself. as professor hodge wrote, it allowed the topic to appear and disappear, just as the label of “slow learner” has done in the history of education, categorization, and disability studies. the scholarship, however, never disappeared. one might be lured and captivated by the story itself for periods of times almost believing the credibility of a museum of a history of classification of disability (hodge, 2016), but then a reminder came through the carefully footnoted academic and scholarly citatiousness of the work. williamson knew the work of scholars that shored up the “fictional” story that contained a very real topic. the theory and philosophy was never lost and also never compromised the story. this is work of literary genius, but herein lies the first sense of danger that i referred to: not everyone can do this. the danger lies in a possible misconception that hermeneutic work is superficial, an assumption that there is no method, there are no rules, no guidelines, or that “anything goes.” john reminds us that there is not only one way to work hermeneutically, or to apply hermeneutics in a research capacity as a “method.” caputo reminds us that method in the etymological sense is “making one’s way along (meta) the path (odos) to truth” (caputo, 2015, p. xi). in moules et al. (2015), the authors wrote of the idea of “being methodical and following leads” (p. 55) but what is perhaps missed in their discussion is that the leads have to be good leads! the “discipline of attending to things” (dostal, 2002, p. 251) involves a very careful discernment of the intention of the medium in which the work is shown. there are creative works that are very intentional and purposeful and they are presented in particular ways because they are consistent with the topic. as another example, i offer the doctoral work of dr. debb hurlock (2003; 2008) who was examining the use of bronwen wallace’s poetry in teaching nursing classes for deliberate pedagogic purposes. there are many poems in her thesis, including wallace’s but also hurlock’s own poetry and this makes sense. after all, her thesis is about the pedagogic possibilities that lie in poetry. i have, however, read other theses and even published hermeneutic papers where there is what appears to be random poems that are thrown in for some emphasis or attempt at moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 5 3 creativity that does nothing to enliven the topic being discussed. it appears instead that they are an effort to appear adventuresome, poetic, and interpretive, and that is somehow associated with thinking and writing hermeneutically. it is here where we run into the difficulty of our work being dismissed as trite, insubstantial, superficial, and sometimes just silly. this is the challenge i face with students who embark on hermeneutic research: constantly negotiating how to teach students to be care-full, considerate, discerning, attentive, and scholarly, while nurturing the capacity to think and write interpretively and taking some well-considered risks. this is a continual learning for me in my own work as well and what most often guides me is the constant presence of the topic on my shoulder asking if what i am doing, and how i am doing it, is taking me toward the topic or further away from it. max hunter, in his search for the disappearing/appearing slow learner, seems to know this. he is sometimes following bad leads that take him away what what he seeks, and often get him into trouble! as a skilled and hard-boiled detective though, he seems to catch himself in time and although he comes away a little bruised and worse for wear, he recovers his trail and seems to even know when he is getting close to something that is important. this is the work of interpretation in hermeneutic research. something in our interviews/transcripts might catch our attention and we are off on an exhilarating tangent and chase, finding dozens of books and papers that inform us about the interpretation and it is captivating and exciting and sometimes it works. other times, it really has been a bad lead and has taken us away from the mystery of the topic. a little battered and bruised, we have to give up the lead and all those hours of investigation, and head home to the data and start again. these are careful considerations that often cannot be done alone and need the help of others, just as max is saved by foucault and derrida, gadamer and heidegger, or colleen birdseye, just when he needs them! the serialization of this work offers an adventure that is fictional and yet it is not. it is a fictionalization of a very real topic and concern. this is what distinguishes this work as applied hermeneutics research that seeks to understand the complexity of human experiences and grapples with the great problems that we encounter in our everyday practices and lives (mccaffrey & moules, 2016). of all actions, those performed for a purpose have been least understood, no doubt because they have always been counted the most understandable and are to our consciousness the most commonplace. the great problems are to be encountered in the street. (nietzsche, 1881/1982, p. 78) dr. williamson takes us to the streets in a very literal sense in max’s hard-boiled detective work investigating the great problem presented in this work. in doing so, dr. williamson offers us a particularly good lead in his work, one that takes us closer to the possibility that applied hermeneutic work, when done well, can look different and still be scholarly and academic. it is a reminder to me that when one listens deeply to the topic, the topic has something to say about how it needs to be investigated and sometimes (or not) even found. moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 5 4 references caputo, j.d. (2015). foreword: the wisdom of hermeneutics. in n.j. moules, g. mccaffrey, j.c. field, & c.m. laing, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. dostal, r. (2002). gadamer’s relation to heidegger and phenomenology. in c. guignon (ed.), the cambridge companion to gadamer (pp. 247-266). new york, ny: cambridge university press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/2004). truth and method (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). london, uk: continuum. hodge, n. (2016). invited guest editorial. lives worthy of life: the everyday resistance of disabled people. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 2. hurlock, d. (2003). possibilities of a poetic pedagogy: “the movement by which a life gets changed for keeps.” (unpublished doctoral thesis). university of calgary, calgary, ab, canada. hurlock, d. (2008). possibilities of a poetic pedagogy: integrating poetry and professional education. saarbrücken, germany: vdm verlag dr. müller aktiengesellschaft & co. mccaffrey, g., & moules, n.j. (2016). encountering the great problems in the street: enacting hermeneutic philosophy as research in practice disciplines. journal of applied hermeneutics, article 1. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5dv1d51 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. nietzsche, f. (1982). daybreak: thoughts on the prejudices of morality (r.j. hollingdale, trans.). cambridge, uk: cambridge university press. microsoft word estefan review.docx corresponding author: andrew estefan, rpn phd email: aestefan@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics june 29, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 book review: “opus hermeneuticae.” the work of hermeneutics: a review of moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang andrew estefan the journal of applied hermeneutics serves as a gathering place for scholars from many disciplines to come together and think about how hermeneutics contributes to the exploration and development of disciplinary knowledge. this journal is part of a conversation that, to draw upon gadamer’s (1960/2006) ideas, has a “spirit of its own” (p.385). gadamer believed conversation had emergent properties, bringing into existence something that might not have been foreseen. i have taken great interest in the ways the conversation in this journal is unfolding. conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice is a timely and articulate contribution to this hermeneutic scholarship. read as a whole, the book is a thoughtful accounting of how one might imagine and enact hermeneutic research. the authors’ careful treatment of key philosophical work lends considerable credibility to their accounts of how hermeneutic research can be done. the book contains many examples, closely tied to philosophical and methodological concerns. conducting hermeneutic research is set out in ten chapters, with a foreword by american philosopher and continental philosophy expert, dr. john caputo. in his foreword, dr. caputo calls upon readers to engage with the book in a way that fits a broad hermeneutic agenda. we are being asked to “see the unseeable.” that which is unseeable is precisely so not because it is transcendental, but because of its immediacy. the work of hermeneutics involves doing. interpretation is active, alive, and engaged. moules and her colleagues ask us to see this, and they show us a way. estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 review 1 2 in their opening chapter, “coming to hermeneutics” the authors preface their work with acknowledgement of how being and knowing extends from the past into the present and, in turn, to imagined futures. their words remind me of how dewey’s (1938/1997) theory of experience links experience to history and remembering, and how this invites us into acts of imagination and wonder about possibilities and that which is to come. to engage with the world in this way calls forth humility and ethical obligations. against a background of rich traditions and histories, interpretations are moments in which we are able to think, see, and experience differently but never from a position of certainty or solidity. conducting research that builds upon history, tradition, and experience requires of us an effort to engage with the world in ways that open us to interpretations and also allow us to think and move around them. this book explores some murky territory for hermeneutics, that is, the possibility of a method for the conduct of hermeneutic research. to do this, the authors have very clearly moved from an engaging and illuminating account of the philosophical foundations of hermeneutic phenomenology through to examples of how hermeneutics is being enacted in the world. in their opening chapter, the authors clearly set the scene for tensions that arise between philosophy, topic, and method, and they return to show these tensions throughout the text as they describe and explain their research and practice. chapter 2 engages with the voices that have shaped the hermeneutic research landscape. of particular note for me is the careful attention to the confluences and departures in thinking between key figures who have influenced contemporary hermeneutic research. the ideas in this chapter, indeed throughout the book, are accessible to students and more seasoned academics alike. the historical tracing in this chapter helpfully clarifies what hermeneutics brings to understanding in a field of practice. chapter 3 is devoted to the work of gadamer. through a focus on his work, the authors weave a complex argument for the place of hermeneutics in human understanding and in inquiry in practice disciplines. chapter 4 extends the thinking in the previous chapter, by way of a “for and against” method. learners, as well as those engaged in hermeneutic work, will find a home in this chapter. the discussion here is suffused with the tensions of bringing together reticence about “method” with the necessary conditions for enacting the “doing.” the authors clearly evoke the troubles of subscribing to method scripts that privilege one type of knowing over another. by invoking dostal and gadamer, the authors shift our thinking from method in its conventional or prescriptive sense to recognition that method is a discipline of attending to “things.” this is an important shift in this chapter because it heralds for us a turn towards a different conception of what it might mean to be methodical. at the same time, the writing refocuses us to attend to things; in other words, giving primacy to the topic that hermeneutics sets out to engage, and in which it also lives. with attending to the topic as a central endeavor the authors carefully choose the term guidelines to escape the traps of the “methodological imperative” and to “steady the motion” of inquiry. the five guidelines in this chapter are extremely helpful. they read as principles rather than instructions that researchers can think with as they explore, inquire, and engage interpretively. chapter 5 invites readers to consider the address of the topic and in doing so, calls attention to an important premise of hermeneutic work: that hermeneutic inquiry begins in a world already estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 review 1 3 saturated. as we live and practice in this saturated world, sometimes we are given reason to pause, or we encounter a sudden change in direction that draws attention to something that we were previously unaware. in this book, the address is emphasized as a catalytic moment: it is the moment when understanding begins, it is a sensitization to the possibility of a topic for inquiry. address hones the mind and senses to notice as the unfolding topic weaves in and out of shadows. chapter 6 provides helpful advice and techniques for conducting interviews in hermeneutic research. the idea of crossing boundaries is invoked to explain that research conversations do indeed step over the boundaries of ordinary social conversation. the point is made that effective research interviews are skillfully enacted and purposeful. moules and her colleagues suggest some strategies for effective interviewing in hermeneutic research without lapsing into trying to define the “hermeneutic interview” and they are wise in their avoidance of making grand claims in this regard. in their care-full discussion, the authors go on to clarify an important point: that effective conversational interviewing in research is not the same as gadamer’s notion of the genuine conversation. the tensions between these conceptions of conversation are well played out in the text, and this is a particularly useful discussion for those who are new to hermeneutics as well as those seeking clear direction about how undertake a qualitative research interview. in chapter 7, data analysis is positioned as synonymous with interpretation. in order to analyze in a hermeneutic study, researchers must engage with data interpretively and this chapter grounds the reader in the theoretical and practical dimensions of interpretive practice. important questions about analysis are addressed in this chapter. for example: how far can one go with an interpretation before it extends beyond a defensible origin in data? why should a hermeneutic researcher be prepared to extend interpretations into broader social and theoretical landscapes? when do some techniques (like using metaphor and etymology) become limiting in their capacity to extend the interpretive endeavor? these are important questions for hermeneutic researchers to entertain and resolve in the process of designing their studies and inquiring into particular topics and phenomena. chapter 8 argues for interpretive writing as that which connects analysis to interpretation and as the medium through which hermeneutics can reveal itself. this chapter is very much a “show” rather than “tell.” the chapter draws heavily upon the doctoral research of two of the authors (mccaffrey & laing) to show possibilities for, and styles of, interpretive writing. both examples are strong and herein lies a risk for this text: that the exemplars offered could seem out of reach for some, because both mccaffrey and laing are accomplished interpretive writers. this risk is minimized in the glimpses the authors have provided into their thinking as they wrote and subsequently engaged with their interpretations. for me, this chapter calls forth a wondering about the experiences and phenomena that shape my own research inquiries. as i wonder, i recognize my entry into these curiosities and puzzles is different to how mccaffrey and laing approached theirs. as i result, i do not feel alienated from the text; instead i am prompted to imagine a different form of interpretive expression. thinking with the material in this chapter has been instructive and also freeing. the examples in this book are best read as invitations, not prescriptions, and, as with the preceding chapters, they open thinking space for interpretive practice rather than close it down. estefan journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 review 1 4 the increasing uptake of qualitative research methods means that criteria for rigor in qualitative research continue to be explored and debated. in the context of postmodern sensibilities, it is no longer possible to retain confidence in a “one size fits all” approach to determining good qualitative work. the diversity of theoretical underpinnings, methods, and intents mean that panmethodological approaches to rigor will simply no longer do. chapter 9 titled, “the rigor and integrity of hermeneutic research” assertively dispels the notion that generalized criteria can be applied to hermeneutic research. the authors quote marguerite sandelowski (1993, p.2), who argues rigorous research as being that which maintains a “fidelity to the spirit…of the work.” if this is indeed what forms the foundation of rigor, the spirit of the work must be captured in criteria that pertain to the method. chapter 9 sets out considerations and criteria for rigorous hermeneutic research. these criteria make sense in the context of the theoretical and practical concerns already made explicit in the book. the coherence here is striking, and although some familiar terms of qualitative rigor appear in the chapter they are being moved in interesting ways that will provoke further conversations among scholars in hermeneutics as well as other qualitative approaches. in their final chapter, the authors address the “so what” questions associated with hermeneutic research. this chapter concludes in a way that reveals a further way this book might work in the world. in the apology, socrates explained his duty of being a cross-examiner of “the pretenders to wisdom.” moules and her colleagues cross-examine influential ideas about hermeneutic work and, in doing so, they open up something new, in light of what has gone before, exposing, revealing and concealing in an intelligent and elegant way. this is what happens when immersed in a world made knowable by hermeneutics. to conclude, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice will be an influential new voice in the research methodology literature. this book is a product, in part, of concerns about method for hermeneutic research. dewey (1938/1997) emphasized how living things, such as people, attempt to turn the energies that act upon them into “means of [our] own further existence” (p.1). hermeneutics not only acts upon us, it is within us. hermeneutics is energetic, it is pervasive, and sometimes hard to capture as it hides amid the experiences of the world. moules and her colleagues go a long way towards harnessing hermeneutics in a way that leaves it free and unencumbered, but that makes possible a vision of how it might sustain us in research work. this book is an opus hermenuticae; it is the work of hermeneutics, and, it works. references dewey, j. (1938/1997). democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. new york, ny: free press. gadamer, h.g. (1960/2006). truth and method (3rd ed, j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans). london, uk: continuum. sandelowski, m. (1993). rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. advances in nursing science,16(2), 1-8. microsoft word gilham2final.docx corresponding author: christopher m. gilham email: cmgilham@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics september 21, 2012 the author(s) 2012 f r o m t h e “ s c i e n c e o f d i s e a s e ” t o t h e “ u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h o s e w h o s u f f e r ” : t h e c u l t i v a t i o n o f a n i n t e r p r e t i v e u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f “ b e h a v i o u r p r o b l e m s ” i n c h i l d r e n christopher m. gilham abstract in this interpretive essay, i attempt to unconceal the problematic history at play in special education in alberta today, with a focus on “behaviour students” or their norm-referenced disability status. a brief, but central, anecdote is used to help reveal some of the everyday problems that arise in education because of the behavioural disability framing of students. i suggest that these problems are examples of illich’s appropriated notions of iatrogenesis and counterproductivity. as an applied emancipatory action, i call upon gadamer and ricoeur to help me interpretively turn the common, everyday understanding of pathology and self in the context of others as possibilities for understanding “behaviour students” anew. keywords behaviour, coding, dignity, disorder, iatrogenesis, self-esteem, special education the concern with things which are not understood, the attempt to grasp the unpredictable character of the spiritual and mental life of human beings, is the task of the art of understanding which we call hermeneutics. (gadamer,1996, p. 165) hans-georg gadamer (1900-2002) described hermeneutics as an emancipatory and practical philosophy (1976, p. 17). as a strategist for emotional and behavioural disabilities (ebd) in a large urban public school board, i work with school teams to support their work with “behaviour” students. as a faculty of education phd candidate specializing in interpretive work, my understanding of “behaviour” students has profoundly changed. this emancipatory transformation, at the risk of oversimplifying, is largely the result of interpretively understanding the history of the spegilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 2 cial education work in which i have been immersed. special education, however, continues to dominate in educational understandings of difficult students. for most of the people i work with, this discourse is the unquestioned, accepted truth of students with “behaviours.” in this paper, i attempt to interpretively appropriate and explicate some of the history and current framing of this dominant discourse as applied to the lifeworld in which educators and students find themselves. i suggest the problems brought forward in this paper are an example of what ivan illich (1926-2002) interpretively argued as “iatrogenesis” (1975, p. 14) and “counterproductivity” (pp. 212-214). in opening up or revealing these problems, i hope to offer the possibility of further emancipating and transforming our understanding of difficult students in classrooms. a central and illustrative anecdote: sam overflows the frame around him the setting was a highly resourced classroom 8 students and 3 adults for young children with a particular severe physical disability. the administrator called me to help support her team with a student who was having severe behavioural difficulties. here is an important, telling segment from my observation notes: teacher asks sam to come up to the board: “come on sam. come here and give it a try.” sam looks around at peers. pauses. squirms in seat. flaps arms. puts fingers in mouth. sam gets up. slowly moves to front by teacher while looking at peers and adults. teacher encourages. “it’s ok sam. i’ll help you.” teacher asks sam to point to the numbers and count from 1 to 10. note: peers just counted as a group by 10’s to 100 and sam did not. sam takes pointer. teacher helps sam hold pointer. sam looks at teacher. sam looks at peers. sam looks around the room. teacher helps sam point to 1 and teacher says “1” sam says “1.” sam’s pronunciation is very difficult to understand. this pattern moves along to “5” when sam suddenly throws pointer down, stomps floor, cringes face. teacher: “sam, that’s not ok. we don’t throw things here in this classroom. you’re upset. let’s go sit down.” student aide comes over, standing close to sam. student aide reaches with her hand to take sam’s hand. sam pulls away and kicks student aide in the shin. student aide grabs sam by the arm, angry look on face and with sam resisting, pulls sam to his desk. sam is screaming out something which i can’t understand, and resisting. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 3 teacher is now asking other students to follow along with her as she counts by 10’s to 100. sam is screaming at his desk. this pattern continued throughout the morning i was there. i observed sam’s anger over getting in line, snack-time, and getting dressed in his winter clothes for recess. he is a very complex little boy, full of frustration. consistently frustrated and angry children are not typical in this unique program. it is a program for a particular severe physical disability. the teachers and their administrator feel like they are not able to help a child like sam, which is the reason why they have called me in several times this school year. because i have helped many teachers with students like sam, the administrator also asked me to be part of a larger meeting aimed to help persuade the decision makers in the school board to consider changing the resourcing of the program. sam and some of his peers are students with severe emotional and behavioural disabilities (ebd) and might better be educated in a program for students with ebd, the school claimed. at this level, the school team believed they had reached a limit or a boundary which required different resourcing, or sam and others like him needed different programs that could best fit their “primary needs.” this term “primary needs,” common to us in education, reveals a part of what is at play in our thinking in special education. it hints at a logic structuring the possible ways we think about students. this logic enframes or encloses identity. for example, the current frame around the students in that class including sam is determined by the main physical disability coding placed on them as “kinds” (hacking, 2002, p. 110) of human beings. this limits the ways the school team perceives students, enabling the belief that a student like sam, who also presents with severe behaviours, cannot receive a just education in that specific program. put another way, a standardized slotting mechanism dependent on disability status, which is informed by psychiatry’s technical categories of human abnormality, and its influence in focusing our gaze in particular ways on student behaviours within classrooms does not seem to serve justice to sam and others like him. students who are complex, which most often includes severe behaviours, are beyond special education’s “wanting and doing” (gadamer, 1989, p. xxvi). given this, questions of concern lie within understanding this narrow logic. interwoven, historical logics unsettled then, overflowing the codification as it were, this brief anecdote is an example of the “untiring power of experience” (gadamer, 1976, p. 38). it portends a world much greater, more complex around it. within the anecdote, there are strong threads of both older and modern “logics” woven together plurivocaly (weinsheimer, 1991, p. 183). these “threads interweaving and crisscrossing” (wittgenstein, 1968, p. 32) form the greater rope-like manifestation or discourse of special education. there are other thicker strands intertwined with special education as well. framing students with ebd (and other diagnoses and codes) has been a response to these various historical traditions woven together. aristotle’s logic of a=a the current point of essential power in special education in alberta is coding. the severe ebd coding can only occur if a psychiatrist or registered psychologist diagnoses a gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 4 student with a disability found in the american psychological association’s diagnostic and statistical manual (dsm). the dsm clearly states that diagnosis is independent of the rest of the world. as laurence and mccallum (2009) noted, in the dsm-ivtr: …whatever their original cause, disorders must be considered “a manifestation of a behavioural, psychological, or biological dysfunction in the individual” and that neither deviant behaviour (e.g. political, religious, or sexual) nor conflicts that are primarily between the individual and the society are mental disorders unless the deviance or conflict is a symptom of a dysfunction in the individual. (p. x) key here is the structural logic within the definition. this logic removes the lifeworld and isolates the individual: the disability is inscribed on the person as an inherent abnormality found exclusively in the self. in other words, the functioning self is “out of order,” independent of the world. interpretive scholars have argued (jardine, clifford, & friesen, 2008; kearney, 2003, pp. xxi, 66) that the logic of an independent, self-identifying order can be read back at least to ancient greece as part of aristotle’s (384 bc-322 bc) logic in his work metaphysics. aristotle’s logic starts with a “first principle” which states: “it is impossible for the same thing to belong and not belong simultaneously to the same thing in the same respect” (aristotle, metaphysics. book iv 3 1005b19–20 in gottlieb, 2011). this is known as the logic of noncontradiction. such essential knowing could not contradict itself or be different than what we have claimed at the same time and space. for example, sam and his severe physical disability could not also be a severe emotional and behavioural disability. if his primary way of being in the program was through a severe ebd code, he could not continue to be in the program designed for his particular severe physical disability. this is the logic of codification and is evidenced in the ways for which students are programmed: severe physical disability = program for severe physical disability severe ebd ≠ severe physical disability therefore, severe ebd ≠ program for severe physical disability consequently, severe ebd = program for severe ebd in other words, if sam were to stay in the program for the severe physical disability the administrator, teachers, and school board officials would need to break out of this applied logic of non-contradiction. sam’s team and many of my peers in education would readily accept that sam is more complex than the singularity of the codification and the program as described on paper. yet, a consistent practice in education is to claim that sam needs something different than what can currently be provided for because educators are only prepared for the singular, primary codification or, more commonly, teachers in “regular” programming are only capable of working with mainly “regular” students. the inherited logic of a=a seems to profoundly limit educators’ ability to see and practice outside a singular conceptualization of the student with special education status (or not). this is a harsh generalization however, so i will strive to warrant it throughout this essay. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 5 descartes’ isolated knowing rene descartes (1596-1650) inherited aristotle’s logic in his attempt to solidify the ground upon which humans could talk about knowing things with certainty. “cogito ergo sum” was the result of his thought experiment: “i think, therefore i am” (descartes, trans. 1988, p. 80) this “unshakable proof” for existence happened exclusively, according to this logic, in his mind at the exclusion of the lifeworld in which he was immersed (and thus the connection between his logic and the aristotelian first principle). descartes then went back to his experiences of the world with his new certain causal foundation for knowing which allowed him to continue to follow the aristotelian logic of a substance needing only itself to exist. this was a renewed interpretation of the non-contradictory principle through inner identity-making. understanding the world was a matter of breaking the world down into its essential features. in the breaking down towards certainty, the world emerged as differentiated objects for study, separated from a diminishing whole. auguste comte’s science, logical positivism, and behaviourism comte (1798-1857) believed that science no longer concerned itself with first causes. his emphasis on concrete observations and logical analysis of those observations led to what was called positivism (gadamer, 1982, p. 6). according to ivan illich (1926-2002), comte was also the first to take the then expanding use of the term “norm” and apply it to medicine in the “…hope that once the laws relative to the normal state of the organism were known, it would be possible to engage in the study of comparative pathology” (1975, p. 165). another radical step was taken by a group of thinkers who believed that statements about the world were nonsensical if they could not directly point to the observed, experienced world in a logical, propositional fashion. this was known as the correspondence theory of truth. humanity’s goal in the pursuit of truth is to simply describe everything as it is, via one singular universal and direct perception system of reality knowing. implicit in this system is the perceived direct literalness of human language which is to say: our speaking about the truth of things could never be speculative, poetic, metaphorical, “as” something (davey, 2006; weinsheimer, 1991, p. 129). as a result, the aesthetic loses its significant status as a bearer of truth and is relegated to an interpretation of subjectivity that seems powerless socially and communally. gadamer called this denial of interpretation and historical influence in all human sense-making as the prejudice against prejudice of the enlightenment period (gadamer, 2004, pp. 272-273). positivism was also taken up in earnest by ivan pavlov (1849-1936) and especially b.f. skinner (1904-1990) in their work on shaping behaviours through direct changes in the observable environment. any notion of the inner working of the human being such as mental events and meaning-making were considered fictional (phillips & burbules, 2000, p. 9). skinner’s work was embraced by education in its attempt to shape students into particular kinds of human beings so that learning and an instrumental, productive society could ensue (paul, 2004; phelan, 1996). positivist psychological theory of disruptive behaviour in school also embraces what is sometimes referred to as learning gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 6 theory. children’s unacceptable behaviour is learned behaviour and needs to be identified, monitored and redirected. this represents the skinnerian legacy in schools. baseline data are gathered, students are regulated, their behaviour modified until elimination of the unwanted behaviour is achieved. (slee, 1995, p. 96) hermeneutic philosopher, paul ricoeur (1913-2005), argued that behaviourism works as if human beings are technical, physical objects to manipulate. through such methodology, the experimenter an educator perhaps assumes she/he knows all the variables of the lifeworld of the object, a lifeworld only accounted for via the hard science of physics and chemistry for example and can, by changing such observable variables, extort the appropriate and hypothesized responses from the subject, a student for example (ricoeur, 2007, p. 188). i suggest this is a univocal power reflecting the inherited rationalist logic. the ancient-turned-enlightened logic persists today in special education, despite the various research paradigms that emerged within what is generally known as the postmodern age (sailor & paul, 2004, pp. 37-45). as kearney (2003) wrote: “contemporary thinkers have made much of the fact that the western metaphysical heritage, grounded in greco-roman thought, has generally discriminated against the other in favour of the same, variously understood as logos, being, substance, reason or ego” and “(m)ost ideas of identity, in short, have been constructed in relation to some notion of alterity” (p. 66). at play in emotional-behavioural disabilities today simplified and contradicting, sometimes paralyzing, binaries if we think about the dsm and the nature of coding in the context of sam’s anecdote through this historical weave, the same traditional enlightenment logic continues to be at play. knowing students is a matter of non-contradiction or identity. consequently, a fundamental binary logic of identity and difference sit as the magnetic-like forces upon which our understanding of students (and the world) either attracts to or repels. kearney (2003) and smith (2006) argued this logical binary has been inherited within the western discourse of good and evil, of the monsters among us. today, students with ebd are often seen as the monsters among us but on the margins within our schools, in jails and hospitals, too (gilham, 2011; jardine et al., 2008).i this inherited understanding of difference is different from a logic of conviviality, kin (jardine, 2012), and mutuality found in other cultures (smith, 2006, pp. 35-58). today special education in alberta insists on this logic of identity and difference. thus, one is either able or disabled, normal or abnormal. our observations of students in the unique program resulted in a contradiction within the inherited logic of equating objects with isolated essences or codes. sam presented more complexly than a singular corresponding code would allow, as evidenced in the singular programming present in the classroom and the teachers’ consequently enabled fears that they were not trained to teach students with severe behaviours (jeary, couture, & alberta teachers, 2009, p. 15). something comprehensive in our understanding of one another, of students in the greater context of a lifeworld has been lost in the reification of a category like ebd via the logic of non-contradiction and the dsm’s skinnerian-like descriptive gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 7 approach to constituting mental illness (greenberg, 2010, pp. 238-252) similarly, education’s misbehaviour is concealed in this focus on the disabled, isolated subject as object. illich (1975) profoundly captured what might be taking place: in every society the classification of disease-the nosography-mirrors social organization. the sickness that society produces is baptized by the doctor with names that bureaucrats cherish. “learning disability,” “hyperkinesis” (adhd today), or “minimal brain function” explains to parents why their children do not learn, serving as an alibi for school’s intolerance or incompetence. (p. 169) as a result “the sick person is deprived of meaningful words for his anguish…his condition is interpreted according to a set of abstract rules in a language he cannot understand” (pp. 170-171) and what was once a rich vocabulary people were able to use to talk about and express their suffering is lost, concealed, and taken over by the “increasing dependence of socially acceptable speech on the special language of an elite profession” (p. 171). gadamer (1996) described this technical knowing, yet limiting phenomenon, as the rational organization of science into a business-like model which has resulted in a general rule for the modern age: “the more rationally the organizational forms of life are shaped, the less is rational judgement exercised and trained among individuals” (p. 17). the above speaks to the arrival of my current work as a strategist, as well; schools believe they have lost all their means to “control” students with ebd coding and call in the “expert” representing the discourse of special education to show them the strategy, the method, the best practice through which control can be had once again. in the process, the question of codification and slotting into further special education status emerges, almost inevitably as a result of the perceived inability to deal with the difficulties students present to us, as a result of inherited ways of categorizing the world into either “this” or “that.” i can do “this with this,” but not “that with that,” it seems. what the experience with sam demands is …a redressing of the balance so as to arrive at a more ethical appreciation of otherness. such an appreciation reminds us that the human stranger before us always escapes our egological schemas and defies our efforts to treat him/her as a scapegoated ‘alien’ or, at best, an alter ego. openness to the other beyond the same is called justice. (kearney, 2003, p. 67) solution and results-focussed similarly, the inherited foundational logic and its application in scientific thinking insists that the goal of working with students with ebd must be solution or resultsfocussed, as soon as possible. in other words, we perpetually attempt to “re-code” the disability and associated strategies in the hopes that we will figure out and cure inappropriate student behaviours once and for all, such that difficult and ambiguous human behaviour will ultimately be consoled, such that nothing out of the social order of schools and classrooms could ever happen. there seems to be no room for an inconsolable approach to being with one another in special education (britzman, 1998, pp. 49-60). there is a concomitant ideal that progress is only measured in the reduction or elimination of behavioural issues in students, evidence of the impact behaviourism has had on special education. this can be seen through goals as measures of success in ingilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 8 dividual program plans (ipps) which often state the desired percentage decrease in unruly behaviour. moving, accelerating, and fragmenting targets in the detection of sickness medicine does two things: it “discovers” new disorders, and it ascribes these disorders to concrete individuals. (ivan illich, 1975, p. 92) depending on time and place, who and what counts as an ebd student differs, as well (winzer, 2009, pp. 129-153). the overall arching logic driving the belief in an autonomous inherent disability within students also conceals the historically-effected conditions under which students are seen as having this disability, by whatever names such inherent self-rooted behaviours have and will continue to be called over time. characteristically, educators were driven more by a search for specificity. the need to understand deviance led to a parsing of complex actions. as special educators broke diffuse generic concepts into specific categories, the terms for categorical definitions of exactly who was behaviourally disordered constantly expanded, collapsed, and were reenvisioned. descriptors and classification systems generally showed a murkiness that reflected both changing public morality and the subjective offerings of observers. in fact, the terminology used by the educational, legal, and correctional systems became so unclear and overlapping that a 1959 writer chided that “all of these categories, supposedly separate and distinct, represent a paragon of confusion since they may very well describe similar facts. (clayton, 1959, in winzer, 2009, p. 132) as a result of this persistent logic and others, there has been, overall, a manifold, accelerating increase in codes and programs for those codes. neat little boxes for the autonomously independent and isolated disabilities have become the norm within the abnormal. entering the logic of codification results in a perpetual, non-stop attempt to categorize everything humans do that is deemed excessive, inappropriate, or abnormal: for example, the effort is focused on what to call this behaviour, and how to describe its criteria in such a way that professionals can objectively assign this disability to others without having to talk about theories of the self, inner urges, and sufferings. illich argued (1975) that the entire modern medical profession was built upon a foundation of creating objective disease for the purpose of sustaining and enlarging the control and power of the medical bureaucracy. he took a much older and recognized medical phenomenon and applied it to the modern phenomenon i have been describing: “…an expanding proportion of the new burden of disease of the last fifteen years is itself the result of medical intervention in favor of people who are or might become sick. it is doctor-made, or iatrogenic” (p. 14) or, in other words, “all clinical conditions for which remedies, physicians, or hospitals are the pathogens, or “sickening” agents” (p. 27). in our education and special education context we could say that both the school system itself, infused with educational psychology’s power, and built upon an industrial model of schooling, is complicit as a “sickening” agent. illich argued it is not just school, but our modern industrial society as iatrogenic (p. 88) resulting in an entire population as disabled: “at each stage of their lives people are age-specifically disabled” (p. 79). gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 9 “just plain sick” gary greenberg (2010) in manufacturing depression summarized the consequences of having ebd categorized like index cardsii through descriptions of symptoms only: we are just plain sick. which means we can get better. we don’t have to look back at the fire that rained down on us or outward to the inhumanity inflicted in the name of prosperity or forward to the certainty of our own suffering. we don’t have to be stunned at the cruelty-or, for that matter, thrilled by the tragedy-of life on earth or worried that pursuing happiness the way we do is also pursuing destruction. we can be healed. we can get our minds to work the way they are supposed to. and then we can get back to business. (p. 314) as gadamer (1996) noted, this has become possible only in this technical age: “the intrinsic impossibility of simply making oneself an object to oneself emerges completely only with the objectifying methods of modern science” (p. 35). allen frances, once head of the now published dsm, is now adamantly opposed to the very idea of the dsm: “we’re being overdosed and overmedicated…we create a society of people who regard themselves as sick” (wente, 2012). some argue that in our hopes to pre-empt inappropriate behaviour we actually constitute more spaces through which we can marginalize children psychologically (laurence & mccallum, 2009, p. 7). being “just plain sick” assumes that our modern medical institution conceals what illich (1975) termed “the art of suffering” (p. 128), inherent to every traditional culture. suffering, as a performative activity in traditional cultures, allowed humanity to engage with life fully. to be in good health means not only to be successful in coping with reality but also to enjoy the success; it means to be able to feel alive in pleasure and pain; it means to cherish but also to risk survival… each culture gives shape to a unique gestalt of health and to a unique confirmation of attitudes towards pain, disease, impairment, and death, each of which designates a class of that human performance that has traditionally been called the art of suffering. (illich, 1975, p. 128) in the modern objectifying and levelling science of medicine, there is a “war against all suffering” which has “undermined the ability of individuals to face reality, to express their own values, and to accept inevitable and often irremediable pain and impairment, decline and death” (pp. 128-129). once categorized or codified, the object that becomes of the human being must now be repaired, healed, or managed in order to get back onto the assembly line of modernity. psychiatry struggled to survive within this modern objectification of illness and concealment of suffering. greenberg (2010) compellingly argued that the dsm was rewritten as a response to psychiatry’s near death in the 1970s at the hands of groups who would no longer tolerate injustices like the classification of homosexuality as a mental health disease, for example. psychiatry wanted to be like modern medicine and thus the dsm was re-written to allow for the application of diseases to be merely a matter of confirming symptomatic criteria (greenberg, 2010, pp. 238-252). this re-write of the dsm also has an early history attached to the emphasis on positivism seen at the time of comte through the work of emil kraepelin (1856-1926) (young, 1995, pp. 95-96). gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 10 diagnosing by symptoms as evidence of actual inherent illness or disease is the practice used today in school psychology, which is the necessary condition required for coding (alberta, 2009). stated differently, if an expert thinks a student meets the symptomology, validated by the reports of others around the student and forms of mental and behavioural measurement, then the student is diseased just as one might be diseased with cancer or diabetes. the goal in both diagnoses is to heal or manage such disease. along with greenberg and illich, i suggest that life’s difficulties, and the suffering that ensues is concealed by the push for dealing with these diseases and getting on with life, the life of production and consumption. shrinking “this,” expanding “that” i argue we are part of a descending ladder of further, smaller divisions of classifications or kinds or codes, a “typology of disasters” (ricoeur, 2007, p. 196) within which ebd is an even more contentious part. this complex series of logics inherent in the approach to student (and adult) behaviour remains the same and is, at root, a pervasive obstacle holding possibility for seeing and being otherwise chained in a cave of spinning suffering and sickness and fragmentation. the idea that health is a balance (gadamer, 1996, p. 19) of life within community is at stake here; any sign of suffering is often taken as disease, categorized and treated individually. illich (1975) wrote over 35 years ago: diagnosis always intensifies stress, defines incapacity, imposes inactivity, and focuses apprehension on non-recovery, and on one’s dependence upon future medical findings, all of which amounts to a loss of autonomy for self-definition. it also isolates a person in a special role, separates him from the normal and healthy, and requires submission to the authority of specialized personnel. once a society organizes for a preventive disease-hunt, it gives epidemic proportions to diagnosis. the ultimate triumph of therapeutic culture turns the independence of the average healthy person into an intolerable form of deviance. (p. 96) unsurprisingly, the extent of this prejudice extends to the ebd definition. in 1990, the united states’ new definition for ebd was immediately met with debate because, in the pursuit of measurable, objective proofs, “neither logical argument nor empirical studies supported a distinction between social maladjustment and emotional disturbance (see kauffman, 1993a)” (winzer, 2009, p. 133). at risk, as well, is our ability to see difference in others outside of the binary of a shrinking “this” and an ever expanding “that.” the norm retracts in the face of an ever-increasing abnormality. …as networks of governmental intelligibility grow more rigorous, and everincreasing numbers of categories of difference are created and deployed…and as new norms of conduct are fashioned and enforced, we should perhaps be concerned that this occurrence is likely to happen with ever greater frequency. it seems somewhat inevitable that tolerance for difference will decrease as the parameters of the normal are more and more tightly drawn and policed, and the consequence may be that more and more children find themselves placed outside the mainstream door. (tait, 2010, p. 91) american moves and ebd’s positivism the current situation is compounded by the influence of the united states political landscape on the educational system in alberta. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 11 a larger more encompassing trend in western educational research has been driving for evidenced-based best practices that meet a gold standard of quantifiable research methodology (ady, 2006; baglieri, valle, connor, & gallagher, 2010; bennett & wynne, 2006; kauffman, crockett, gerber, & landrum, 2007) despite debate as to what counts under such a standard (ferri, 2011). as a result of this, a sharp shift occurred away from a re-conceptualized era of both post-positivist and interpretive and qualitative educational research (pinar, 1995) to a results-oriented, positivist-based research paradigm. this positivist return came as a result of several damning and damaging publications in the united states which scorned the failures of their educational system. as a result, the us government passed the “no child left behind act” of 2001 which became the focal point for the return to a positivistic educational framing: the passage of the no child left behind act of 2001 is the most obvious of these moves. the law calls explicitly and exclusively for the use of scientifically based research (a phrase used 111 times within it) as the foundation for many education programs and for classroom instruction. gardner (2002) suggested that the text of this law echoes a pervasive theme within current discussions of education in america. this theme is the continuing failure of educational research to improve the dire state of the american public educational system. (barone, 2007, p. 455) since the “science wars” of the 1980s, precipitated by the earlier work of philosophers of science like thomas kuhn (1970) and paul feyerabend (1975), there has been a shift towards an understanding that even science is value-laden (maxwell, 2009; paul, 2002). however, in the field of ebd, empirical, objective knowledge is still reified and highly sought after (paul, 2002, pp. 87-91). for example, in a three-part series in the journal of emotional and behavioural disorders, key figures over the past 30 years from this traditional field were asked what they believed were critical and promising moments for ebd work (zabel, kaff, & teagarden, 2011, p. 133). almost univocally, one of their greatest hopes was in applied behavioural analysis (aba is a direct descendent of skinner’s behaviourism) as a method of shaping and changing behaviour in problematic students. alberta education has embraced the positivistic approach with the support and publication of documents such as boats – behaviour, observation, assessment, teaching (2006) – and supporting positive behaviour in alberta schools (2008), for examples. in both documents the language of aba is prominently used: when inappropriate student behaviours occur, educators should collect data to determine the function of behaviour, those functions defined precisely into five essential categories, and then use aba like methodology to either reinforce positive behaviours or extinguish negative ones. the behavioural support plan, functional assessment report, and individualized program plan are further enactments and artifacts of a behaviourist approach to ebd. all this belies the logics of non-contradiction and reductionism enacted in a positivist behavioural framework. at stake as well then, is the possibility for a future informed by a critical assessment of the prejudices of the past: one of the serious costs of dropping anchor in operant waters is that students of the methods of behaviourism, and researchers given only positivist tools, lose the rich histories of culture and science gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 12 from which intellectual tools and moral compasses for the future are fashioned. (paul, 2002, p. 90) in other words, without being historically conscious of how education has arrived at its current places, educators run the risk of an ongoing sedimentation into what would become the taken for granted accepted practices of the day. as a result, only the special education experts with the expert, hard-core scientific knowledge of aba and aba-like methods can do the work needed for students with ebd. exclusionary practices are sustained via stratified forms of knowers and knowledge. “special education research has become self-referenced over the past three decades…this situation creates researchers who do not value, and are not prepared to negotiate, differences among different perspectives about knowledge” (paul, 2002, p. 85). rights as choice and defense alberta’s education system is a highpressure consumer-culture of educational choice: “forced to act as ‘citizen consumers’ (taylor and woollard, 2003), parents shop for the most promising educational opportunities for their children, and the schools try to attract the top students with enrichment programmes” (graham & jahnukainen, 2011, p. 230). families are swept up into this, hoping for further specialization (another form of fragmentation) for the personalized benefit of their children in the hopes they will be successful. along with this, comes an attitude to preserve or defend the norm for children. it is extremely common in my work for both parents and teachers to claim that students with ebd should not be in regular classrooms because it is unfair to the other children, to have to suffer that child. there are times when the safety of children is at risk so the claims are warranted. there are many times though when this is not the case. entrenched in this culture of choice and defence are localized notions of the norm: the belief that particular schools are meant for particular kinds of learning, therefore particular kinds of students, especially when “students who constitute a threat to the school in terms of reputation (academic or otherwise) are poorly viewed, which creates hierarchies of student value and innumerable incentives to shift undesirable students elsewhere” (ball, gillborn, & youdell, 2000, in graham & jahnukainen, 2011, p. 268). in many charter and private schools, coded students are often screened out. in the public system, i have been witness to school administrators not accepting students with ebd codes into their schools because those students did not live in the school’s designated communities. yet, there were many students attending these same schools from outside the designated community who did not have an ebd code. the a=a logic finds itself abundant in this market-driven consumer culture of choice and defence and also, at the same time, abundantly selective. some argue this neo-liberal, marketdriven social imaginary has dismantled a civil society human connection in preference to competitive individualism (slee, 2011, p. 38; smith, 2006). high stakes testing and accountability measures provide parents with what is considered rightful knowledge to choose the best education for their children. choice and competition as “approaches to social policy pit ‘different conceptions of rights against one another’ as individual competition for public goods works in direct contrast to ‘the idea that a universally accessible public education system ought to exist gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 13 which is available to any [persons] regardless…of economic means’” (davidsonharden & majhanovich, 2004, p. 270 in graham & jahnukainen, 2011, p. 280). at risk now in alberta is a further decline in the idea of a plural school community, in the very idea of “public” education. this individualism is oddly reversed and exacerbated in special education when the categories of ebd garner much attention through public sites. everyone seems to be able to make a claim about who may or may not have a disability (greenberg, 2010, p. 251). i am constantly deflecting teacher and administrator suggestions that their students have adhd or anxiety, for example. families often ask me if they think their child has a mental health disability. as laurence and mccallum (2009) wrote, “they (disability categories) are disseminated through a range of sites, including the mass media, so that although they may have begun as a norm implanted from above, they can be repossessed as a demand that citizens, consumers, survivors make of authorities in the name of their rights, their autonomy, their freedom” (p. xiii). furthermore, illich (1975) argued that the above phenomenon is a sign of a “morbid society” where: ...the belief prevails that defined and diagnosed ill-health is infinitely preferable to any other form of negative label or to no label at all. it is better than criminal or political deviance, better than laziness, better than self-chosen absence from work…social life becomes a giving and receiving of therapy: medical, psychiatric, pedagogic, or geriatric. claiming access to treatment becomes a political duty, and medical certification a powerful device for social control. (p. 123) coding’s in-efficiency movement the industrial production line model in education, a manifestation of the a=a logic, works tirelessly to meet the requirements for its own funding in special education. teams of school psychologists work almost exclusively on social-emotional and cognitive assessments so that school administrators can attach coding status to students which results in increased funding for the school and supports for the students now codified. a part of that funding provided by the codes also pays for the psychologists to do the work needed to acquire the funding. the very system created to support students has resulted in its own army of expert mental measurers who could be directly supporting students in need but instead must spend their time producing psychological assessments to meet the criteria for coding (janzen & carter, 2001). special education funding in alberta would better serve students who are diagnosed with emotional and/or behavioural disabilities if there was a base level of funding provided that was not attached to coding. schools would not have to engage in extensive, timeconsuming coding processes in order to access needed resources. it is highly detrimental to meeting students’ needs to have the funding system leading the pedagogical decision-making, labelling students inappropriately and watering down the real meaning of ‘severe disability’or ‘severe behavioural disturbance’, which has (and still is in many other countries/regions) been relatively rare and associated directly with mental illnesses (cole, visser, and daniels 2001). (wishart & jahnukainen, 2010, pp. 186-187) gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 14 the government’s own contracted research pointed this phenomenon out, as well (graham & jahnukainen, 2011). the norm: misleading logic and exclusion the self-fulfilling logic of a=a manifests in special education as the statistical norm. according to ricoeur (2007), assumed within this tool and its creation of the norm is a conflated, misleading logic: the statistical norm is a universal constant, and this constant is separate from the valuative, ideal aspects of the norm in a given culture for example, happiness or success (pp. 189-190). the norm is ambiguous precisely because the tools of mental measurement like the standard bell curve are at once both contingent and expressions of value. gadamer (1976) wrote: “one look at such fields of investigation as ethnology or history informs us that spaces and times produce highly different life-worlds in which highly different things pass as unquestioningly self-evident” (p. 189). in other words, the norm is relative to culture. “normality is not an observation but a valuation. it contains not only a judgement about what is desirable, but an injunction as to a goal to be achieved. in so doing, the very notion of ‘the normal’ today awards power to scientific truth and expert authority” (rose, 1989, p. 131 in slee, 1985, p. 20). medical science (and special education) then carries within it these fixed assumptions, substituting social norms for statistical averages. “what is now normal is behaviour capable of satisfying the social criteria for life together with others” (ricoeur, 2007, p. 192). in a society that sees the self as a rational, autonomous and freely choosing individual, anything outside of this social norm that requires assistance or control is seen as sickness. hence, to be healed is to be like others, to act like others. medicine then becomes an “obstacle to life” because “life presents itself as an adventure in which we do not know what is a test or trial and what a failure. life is always evaluated and this evaluation is always relative” (ricoeur, 2007, p. 190). in the physical world, there is no place for illness (only natural laws like gravity) but in the biological world, the world of life, there is no absolute definition of disease. this is especially the case with ebds which have changed over time and yet, psychiatry continues to “index card” mental health as sickness. according to ricoeur (2007), if one accepts that disease is not univocally understood, we are left with the idea that a human life that is abnormal or pathological is one that lives in a “shrunken milieu” (kurt goldstein not referenced properly, in ricoeur, 2007. p. 190). this is a claim about being in the world, not sickness. in special education, however, this idea of a shrunken milieu is often negatively read as sickness; therefore, being a student that requires severe and extensive support in his learning environment is to be a disabled student. this is because special education is founded upon a medical science which says so. put differently, the current discourse on pathology conceals the positive aspects of being a student who interacts with his world differently, in a “shrunken lifeworld” which as a form of existing or being in the world, deserves respect as a form of life with its own structure. this is a very important move on ricoeur’s part. in the interpretive tradition, he attempted to renew our understanding of pathology. pathos is “suffering” and logia is “to study” (harper, 2012). our modern understanding of pathology is the science or study of suffering, of diseases. this science has taken on a certain framing which i tried to illustrate above through the interwoven gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 15 historical logics. ricoeur however, brings back “logia” as “logos.” logos has not always been interpreted as an a=a analyticaltype proposition for understanding the world, including human beings. logos also can be read as “being” which is an ontological claim. “being,” in this renewed ontological reading, wishes to respect sam as a human life in the world, a world that both shapes and is shaped by sam and others around him. “being,” in this interpretive sense, entails the understanding that thought does not precede language. given this, language actually gives form to our understanding of the world. language is therefore constitutive and this action is not restrained within the mind of a reasoning being exclusively; nor is it free to be anything it wants. both the world and those who use language interact. being human is to be this being that is capable of bringing being to the world through its full, conscious immersion in the world. hence, ricoeur’s renewal of pathology admits that human beings suffer and we should study this suffering but we should carefully consider how we study because in the “studying” in the sense-making that takes place, like the use of the language of disability and coding there are moral implications for human beings. these moral implications should help guide our constituting language actions. with great caution however, this does not mean that choosing our words carefully is all that needs to happen, either. the words we use the language available to us is deeply impacted by the traditions around us. it is not as if, in simply changing names of ebds, we get around the deeper logic at play in what might normally be called ordinary language use. on the contrary, seeing the world differently requires seeing how it is that we are currently seeing and once this begins, new possibilities for understanding the world emerge, which is, at once, new ways to talk about others, like sam. in short, ricoeur (2007) and gadamer (1996) have led me to this understanding: pathology as “the study of the being of those who suffer” is very different from “the science of disease.” sadly though, in the anecdote, a student like sam cannot be seen as co-existing in a relationship with the world that is smaller or more dependent than the ways of being of other, differing students, or other forms of life, despite all of our dependencies in and on the world. it is no surprise that asking sam to count to ten an impossible task for him at this time would cause him intense frustration. the connection here to our understanding of teaching and learning is paramount. codification within the norm displaces the understanding that humans are different and interact with the world in different ways by identifying this difference as disability or dis-order. whose dis-order, i ask? today, as a result of the current system codification results in exclusion, the “social stigma par excellence” where “inferiority and depreciation are thus socially normed” (ricoeur, 2007, p. 192). counterproductivity and emancipation “the most primordial mode in which the past is present is not remembering, but forgetting” (gadamer, 1976, p. 203) in the entrenched historical logics of knowledge and what has become special education for students with ebd, limits are reached and exceeded between the current dominant ways of knowing students, and how students actually live in classrooms. another way of describing what i have attempted to explicate thus far is through ilgilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 16 lich’s (1975) notion of “counterproductivity”: “it exists whenever the use of an institution paradoxically takes away from society those things the institution was designed to provide” (pp. 212-213). in our industrial society, he wrote that people want “to be taught, moved, treated, or guided rather than to learn, to heal, and to find their own way” (p. 214) and “when perception of personal needs is the result of professional diagnosis, dependence turns into painful disability” (p. 219). the anecdote with sam is a particular site of heated contestation around this phenomenon. i suggest sam’s anecdote is a practical, real summons to those of us in education to question that which has been, and continues to be, accepted, and perhaps taken for granted as the only fixed ways of seeing and being with students. how much of what we do in special education actually takes away from what we want education to do in the first place? a great deal, i have suggested. the revealing of what is going on around us presently as an effect of our lived history is actually a way of taking emancipative action (gadamer, 1976, p. 18). this is an act of historical consciousness-revealing, cultivating our ability to see what is or should be questionable (gadamer, 1976, p. 13). this is also known as a “hermeneutic consciousness” which: …finds its paradigmatic realization in the interpreter’s awareness that the words and concepts he employs are historically conditioned and that they prejudice his interpretation. for this reason, he does not automatically accept their validity or assume their eternal verity; rather he inquires into their origin and history. (weinsheimer, 1991, p. 229) despite experience’s overturning actions, it is easy to fall back into the given of current ways of knowing the world because they are our traditions, our prejudices, our inheritances. i am often obliged to fall back within the given because it is the structure through which my work occurs most of the time. although these traditions structure our ways of knowing, they do not restrict us from knowing differently, however. gadamer (1976) argued that knowing these traditions as pre-judgements in our daily lives allows us to understand what is happening around us, and to be different (p. 9). possibilities emerge once we notice how we have become and are always on the way to becoming more than what we currently are. the challenge is to fuse the horizon of the past with the present, in anticipation of a different way of being tomorrow. one such possibility i discovered during this process of cultivating a historical consciousness is the case of finland (graham & jahnukainen, 2011). between 1994 and 2007, they have had a significant increase in the numbers of students placed in regular classes, a slight increase in students placed in special classes (located in community schools), and an actual decrease in students placed in specialized schools. finland, it has been suggested, does not have the same complex weave found here in alberta. some quick facts highlight the differences: 95% of children begin preschool at age 6. drop-out rate is 0.07%. high school is either through a vocational school or academic upper secondary, both starting at grade 10. 99% of schools are state or publicly run. no high stakes, standardized tests. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 17 culture of deep respect for education and teachers: “pedagogical conservatism.” high degree of trust between educator, political leaders, and parents. curriculum is value driven: equity, participation, flexibility, progressiveness. education is seen as essential to social reform: they have been working on educational reform for decades. fiscal restraint has brought about changes in special education services. use a model of “part time special education” in community schools. as a result, only 6.4% of student population is identified as “special education” which is approximately half the rate in alberta. most of this student population is not in high schools and the retention rate is 89% compared with 70.4% for alberta. special education status is not determined by specialized assessment or diagnosis; it is determined first by teachers and parents who focus on student learning needs. every school of about 300 students has a full time special educator who works on reading, writing and arithmetic, especially in the early years. they are not part of the inclusion movement rather, their system is built on what they call “fully comprehensive schools” which embody the notion of “education for all.” the finland example shows the importance of seeing alberta’s special education context against other cultural contexts. seeing others and their ways of being with students helps inform our understanding of our current ways of being with students and how that could be different, as well. interpretive work acknowledges openly that our lives are “characterized by a great variety of personal, communal, national, historical and religious narratives” (davey, 2006, p.133). this plurality of human existence is why possibilities abound: our stuck ways of framing students are “susceptible to being disrupted” (p. 133). shared esteem or “ourselves as others” in modern society the “i” of our identity seems determined by a “complete selftransparency in the sense of a full presence of ourselves to ourselves” (gadamer & palmer, 2007, p. 239). i am what i see of myself as an independent, rationally acting and therefore free subject. however, the “i” of self is a work of memory and narration within a lifeworld with others (ricoeur, 2007, p. 196). one does not simply make oneself up even within the logic of a=a. even descartes’ logic could not refute that his thinking took place somewhere, at some time, under some conditions. a part of this dialectical action between world and self requires one to make sense of loss, to mourn those things wanted but not gained, had but lost. ricoeur (2007) called this the “double labor of memory and mourning that grafts together the sense of self-esteem” (p. 196). this self-recognition as a narrative capable of creating self-esteem is precisely at risk and “attacked in mental illness” (p. 196). following ricoeur (2007), i want to hinge this notion of self-esteem more clearly onto the role of others in the world around us: “self-esteem does not reduce to a simple relation of oneself to oneself alone. this feeling also includes, within itself, a claim to others. it includes an expectation of approbation coming from these others. in this sense, self-esteem is both a reflexive and a relational phenomenon, where the notion of gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 18 dignity reunites the two faces of such recognition” (p. 196). for students like sam, the relationship between himself and the adults around him at school requires what ricoeur (2007) called a shared or supplementary esteem. again, this requires us to recognize the pathological as more than just negative: it is renewed or strengthened as a smaller, different lifeworld for sam that is something other than “a deficiency, a lack, a negative quality. it is another way of being in the world. it is in this sense that a patient has dignity, is an object of respect” (p. 197). this shared esteem assists “the other to become more resolutely other” and as a result “allows the other to put greater pressure on the adequacy of my self-understanding” (davey, 2006, p. 249). this is to live in the world, with and for others with dignity, i suggest. at this point, i finish with ricoeur’s challenge for those of us in the norm: …to discern in the handicapped individual those resources of conviviality, of sympathy, of living with and suffering that are bound expressly to the fact of being ill or handicapped. yes, it is up to those who are well to welcome this proposition regarding the meaning of illness and to allow it to aid them in bearing their own precariousness, their own vulnerability, their own mortality. (ricoeur, 2007, p. 197) acknowledgments this work is heavily indebted to the mentorship provided by drs. jim field and david jardine. references alberta education. (2009). special education coding criteria 2009/2010: ecs to grade 12 mild/moderate (including gifted and talented) severe. edmonton, ab, canada. retrieved from http://education. alberta.ca/admin/special/resources.aspx alberta teachers' association special education council. (2006). boats : behaviour observation assessment teaching strategies. edmonton, ab, canada: special education council of the alberta teachers' association. alberta education. (2008). supporting positive behaviour in alberta schools. edmonton, ab, canada: alberta education. barone, t. (2007). a return to the gold standard? questioning the future of narrative construction as educational research. qualitative inquiry, 13(4), 454-470. biesta, g., & burbules, n. c. (2003). pragmatism and educational research. lanham, md: rowman & littlefield. britzman, d. p. (1998). lost subjects, contested objects toward a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning. albany, ny: state university of new york press. clayton, m. p. (1959). juvenile offenders and the law. exceptional children, 38, 95105. davey, n. (2006). unquiet understanding: gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics. albany, ny: state university of new york press. descartes, r. (1637 : 1988). meditations on first philosophy (j. s. cottingham, r. stoothoff, & d. murdoch, trans.) descartes selected philosophical writings (pp. 80-85). gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 19 cambridge, ma: cambridge university press. ferri, b. a. (2011). undermining inclusion? a critical reading of response to intervention (rti). international journal of inclusive education, 16, 8, 1-18. feyerabend, p. (1975). against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. london; atlantic highlands: nlb ; humanities press. gadamer, h.-g. (1976). philosophical hermeneutics. berkeley, ca: university of california press. gadamer, h.-g. (1982). reason in the age of science. cambridge, mass: mit press. gadamer, h.-g. (1996). the enigma of health: the art of healing in a scientific age. stanford: stanford university press. gadamer, h.-g. (1989). truth and method. london, england: continuum. gadamer, h.-g., & palmer, r. e. (2007). the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings. evanston, ill.: northwestern university press. gilham, c. (2011). beyond the monster’s wanting and doing: special education as a barrier and diacritical hermeneutics as possibility. canadian journal of education, 34(3), 103-118. gottlieb, p. (2011). aristotle on noncontradiction. the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2011 edition).retrievedfrom http://plato.stanford.edu /archives/sum2011/entries/aristotlenoncontradiction graham, l. j., & jahnukainen, m. (2011). wherefore art thou, inclusion? analysing the development of inclusive education in new south wales, alberta and finland. journal of education policy, 26(2), 263-288. greenberg, g. (2010). manufacturing depression: the secret history of a modern disease. new york, ny: simon & schuster. hacking, i. (2002). historical ontology. cambridge, ma.: harvard university press. hatfield, g. (2011). rene descartes. the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2011 ed.). retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/e ntries/descartes/ illich, i. (1975). limits to medicine. medical nemesis: the expropriation of health. london, england: marion boyars. jardine, d. w. (2012). the descartes lecture. journal of applied hermeneutics. retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5pr7n88 jardine, d. w. (2012). pedagogy left in peace: cultivating free spaces in teaching and learning. new york, ny: continuum. jardine, d. w., clifford, p., & friesen, s. (2008). back to the basics of teaching and learning: "thinking the world together." new york, ny: routledge. jardine, d. w., friesen, s., & clifford, p. (2006). curriculum in abundance. new jersey, ny, usa: lawrence erlbaum associates. jeary, j., couture, j.-c., & alberta teachers association. (2009). success for all: the teaching profession's views on the future of special education in alberta. edmonton, ab, canada: alberta teachers' association. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 20 kant, i., & paton, h. j. (1964). groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. new york, ny: harper & row. kearney, r. (2003). strangers, gods, and monsters: interpreting otherness. london, england; new york, ny: routledge. kuhn, t. s. (1970). the structure of scientific revolutions. chicago, il: university of chicago press. laurence, j., & mccallum, d. (2009). inside the child's head: histories of childhood behavioural disorders. rotterdam, the netherlands; boston, ma: sense publishers. phelan, a. m. (1996). “strange pilgrims” disillusionment and nostalgia in teacher education reform. interchange, 27(3), 331-348. doi: 10.1007/bf01807411 phillips, d. c., & burbules, n. c. (2000). postpositivism and educational research. lanham, md.: rowman & littlefield. pinar, w. (1995). understanding curriculum: an introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. new york, ny: peter lang. ricoeur, p. (2007). reflections on the just. chicago, il: university of chicago press. robinson, d. (producer). (2011, june 25, 2012). just what is kant's project? university of oxford podcasts [podcast] retrieved from http://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/people/danrobinson simms, k. (2003). paul ricoeur. london, england; new york, ny: routledge. slee, r. (1995). changing theories and practices of discipline. london, england; washington, d.c.: falmer press. slee, r. (2011). the irregular school: exclusion, schooling, and inclusive education. new york, ny: routledge. smith, d. g. (2006). trying to teach in a season of great untruth: globalization, empire and the crises of pedagogy. boston, ma; rotterdam, the netherlands: sense publishers. tait, g. (2010). philosophy, behaviour disorders, and the school. boston, ma, rotterdam, the netherlands: sense publishers. weinsheimer, j. (1991). gadamer's metaphorical hermeneutics. in h.g. gadamer, & h.j. silverman (eds.), gadamer and hermeneutics (pp. 181-201). new york, ny: london. wente, m. (2012). is anybody normal anymore? retrieved may 5, 2012, from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opin ions/margaret-wente/is-anybody-normalany-more/article2423352/ winzer, m. a. (2009). from integration to inclusion: a history of special education in the 20th century. washington, dc: gallaudet university press. wittgenstein, l. (1968). philosophical investigations. new york, ny: macmillan. young, a. (1995). the harmony of illusions: inventing post-traumatic stress disorder. princeton, n.j.: princeton university press. zabel, r. h., kaff, m. s., & teagarden, j. m. (2011). an oral history of first-generation leaders in education of children with emotional/behavioral disorders, part 2: important events, developments, and people. journal of emotional and behavioral disorders, 19(3), 131-142. gilham journal of applied hermeneutics 2012 article 10 21 i"" " valle and connor note the school to prison pipeline for students with ebd. they are more represented in prison populations than any other current disability. ii emil kraepelin (1856 – 1926), contemporary with comte and positivism, set about to describe the mental illnesses he saw, thereby establishing an index or nosography of identifiable mental illnesses. greenberg (p. 70 – 71) describes how kraepelin actually did this on index cards and placed them in a ‘diagnosis box’. microsoft word tai.docx corresponding author: dr. nancy j. moules email: njmoules@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics april 22, 2015 ©the author(s) 2015 editorial: aletheia remembering and enlivening nancy j moules dedicated to dr. tyrone dang (april 19, 1956 november 10, 2014) in choosing the cover of our new book, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015), we wanted to showcase a word that seems to be at the heart of hermeneutic work. the word that came to mind was the ancient greek word aletheia. aletheia is a word that is about unconcealment. the word is the opposite of lethal (dead) – aletheia then means to enliven. it is also connected to the mythical river of lethe in hades: the river of forgetfulness – a river that, if crossed, erased memory. aletheia is the antithesis of this: it is about remembering. in its unconcealment, enlivening, and remembering, aletheia brings moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 2 2 home what may have been lost, forgotten, deadened, or concealed in our “simply getting by.” the work of hermeneutics is the work of aletheia. i have a friend that i have known and loved for close to 30 years. he was an award winning family physician and internist in hawaii and he is also one of the fathers of my godson, thanh. ty had a most interesting history. some of his “stories” i have heard over time and i am sure that they have shifted and changed in my mind as all good stories should. i do not then offer this editorial as a biography on his life but rather a “remembering” of him and an unconcealment of the story of him in my mind and experience. ty lived in vietnam with his siblings and his parents. he was the 8th of 10 children. during the vietnam war and the fall of saigon, ty and his parents and siblings experienced famine, abuse, and incarceration. ty himself tried to escape many times and was caught and sent back to jail. his sisters and brothers escaped in awful circumstances under torture of thai pirates and other perils. ty, like eight of his siblings, made it to the united states and from there he pursued degrees in pharmacology and medicine, finally settling in honolulu where he adopted and coparented his son, thanh, from vietnam. ty’s escape from vietnam and his rescue by a german fisherman has been documented in newspapers. his story from childhood to adulthood has been retold in other forms and i had the privilege of receiving hundreds of reflective emails from ty about his life experience and how he looks on it now. what mattered always to him was family. i offer this one. our fourth attempt to escape from vietnam. ma had arranged for me, phuc, hoa, and his wife may, to leave. quick goodbye, in the dark of night, shiny tears like pearls in ma's eyes, looking at her sons. not one, but three pieces of her guts, blood were torn, not in succession, but altogether. bye, ma. i am in a lot of pain, too. we got into a trap soon after we left home. the troubling, vicious red light circling the ocean dark, like red blood pulsating from an open wound, appeared, closer and closer. then stopped, the ocean seemed all red. my heart sank when they boarded our boat. phuc took a beating for being the oldest. the pacific now had ma's blood in it. we were still in handcuffs when the sun rose above the thatch hut where we spent the night. a long yellow school bus is awaiting. time seemed still, stretching in the denied reality. and we were taken to a place called b5, the notorious re-education camp outside of saigon. for the next six months, we spent our time in the inner camp to be interrogated. we were separated in different sections. phuc threw the last glance at us, the younger brothers, loving and pained looks... i am so sorry, so sorry... i did not see him and hoa again for a while... moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 2 3 by october, i was shaved, completely diseased (scabies, typhoid etc.) and no more information to extract out of a 90 lbs. body, ma and ba bought our way out to the labor camp section of b5. the table in the visit room was rough, as wide as an ocean, ma sat there. she looked at me, wordless, tearful, the soft, round teardrops that were sharp, tearing me inside too, ma. we shared the same guts, face, heart, even the laughter. december 1979, we came home. ma’s hair had turned silver from black. an eight-month insomnia, punctured with the sound of mango leaves touching the ground. ma would get up thinking they were our footsteps coming home night after night. the house seemed cold and big. i crawled underneath the bed and slept there for the next two months, fearing the nightmares of the camp would come and take me in my sleep. and again, i left saigon. april 1981, on the day ma brought me into this world, i became a refugee in malaysia. tears of joy, ma, and a few black hairs back in the jungle of white, funereal hairs. phuc is now gone, and i am here thinking about what ma must have felt as a mother, each and single heartbeat, every time disaster struck... have you ever regretted bringing me into this world that was full of deaths, destruction and sufferings? suffering no more, phuc is gone, so is ma. the last of her i saw in a dream, black hair cascading like waterfall, spinning on one foot, and smiling at me. i hope that was where phuc belongs now, with ma/ba. he came home. before tai was diagnosed, he purchased a beautiful home in hawaii kai, which he remodeled. he told me he wanted this to be his family’s “ancestral home” – a place where his family was welcomed and that held the ground of honoring the past, remembering the past, and unconcealing the pain. i told him that what he was doing reminded me of aletheia and he loved the idea, so much that he ordered a sign to be in his home. in his hawaii kai home, this sign was as you entered the door of his home. moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2015 editorial 2 4 ty was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in april 2013 – april mattered to him – it was the month he was born, the month he left vietnam, the month his mom died, the month he was diagnosed, the month he was told he was in remission. he would never die in april; he died on november 10, 2014, while at work at his family practice office, which he never gave up. ty was mischievous. he was a coyote and a raven. he knew hermes intimately. he could make the best of us blush. but he always saw and spoke truth, for what it is. ty knew the hermeneutic call of aletheia. a part of the reason that we live in this world is to experience the terrible hermeneutic angst of remembering. there are times we wish to swim the river lethe and forget, and there are times we are afraid we already have and we clamour to reclaim what is lost from memory. there are things we wish would no longer live and things we want to keep alive forever. in hermeneutic understanding, we know that things must be awakened, recalled, remembered, and suffered. it is why we embrace with “trembling and fear” (with all due respect to kierkegaard) that which we have to be prepared to meet in this kind of research. we have to face the living presence of what we come to suffer or as kearney and caputo suggest – a preparedness to meet the stranger at the door who may be kind or may be a monster. there is hospitality to aletheia – an openness to what might come to, and maybe enter, the door. last week, i received a package from hawaii with the sign enclosed the same week that our book went to press. the sign hangs now just inside the front door of my home. thank you ty. i remember you. microsoft word jardine 2016 coreected proof.docx corresponding author: david w. jardine, phd email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 28, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 “there will not always be teachers like this”: for g.b.m. david w. jardine, phd the buddha said, “because there will not always be teachers like this . . . make a painting in the gate-house of a five-part wheel of cyclical existence, around the circumference of which are the twelve dependent-arisings in both forward and reverse progressions.” the wheel of existence was then drawn. (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 325) it’s a funny thing, when one of your teachers dies, especially at a distance of days and lives and circumstances. i remember in 2002, preparing to give a talk to some gathering of the nursing faculty at the university of calgary when i found out that h.g. gadamer had died, cut off in his prime at 102 years. it had the effect of stilling and suspending what then followed, a talk that has since fallen from memory except for that suspense. the death of a teacher casts the teaching up into the air. a painting in the gate-house will not quite suffice. pictures can be deceptive, perhaps especially ones drawn from memory. now, early afternoon, saturday, january 16, 2016, another old teacher whom i haven’t seen in decades has died: dr. g. b. madison, most recently professor emeritus from the department of philosophy at mcmaster university, hamilton, ontario. he was my ma thesis supervisor and teacher and, for a brief while, friend. our paths separated years ago under circumstances best only hinted at. i can only attest to old memories of grad school and to the paths and prospects that opened up in front of me because of him, sometimes in spite of him, eventually without him. gary was my first example of a living philosopher, full-bodied, teasing, angry, insecure, grinning, playful, sharp, so sharp. eye-glint. pipe. beret. cane. the detail that he demanded and allowed in my tortuous parsing of the work of edmund husserl has held me in good stead ever since. he was the teacher i needed then, who jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 4 2 let me do what was good for me then and still: settling down and teasing every word. good practice. gary’s love of language and his example of how it teases us as much as, perhaps more than, vice versa – well, this repeated freshening fitted my musical ear. the play of language. studied melodies. it’s still how i write, how i think, how i think the world exists. my thesis (jardine, 1976) ended up 181 double-spaced pages, typed on a grey remington upright with carbon paper and a second sheet behind. 321 footnotes. i had a silly contest going with mark franklin, a fellow grad student, regarding who could have the most footnotes in the shortest amount of text. his thesis was on analogical language and the names of god (a great, indirect influence on my work still to come [jardine, morgan, & franklin, 1986; jardine & morgan, 1987a, 1987b; and far beyond this]) while mine had the ominous title of the question of phenomenological immanence. it sure is great to be in your early twenties. four twenty-page papers a term for years in a row. and the still rattling of lineages of work, delves, deep delves. grad school. feeling like i was on to something, in on some secret. hush, now. it’s one i still keep. for me, back then, it was a sort of late-60s dream come oddly, kind-of, true, sort of -a gathering of all those old conversations, night after night in the shade of 1967, 1968. reading alan watts. waiting. then philosophy and religious studies as an undergraduate. then a philosophy ma. phenomenology. great greased underlines of eugen fink’s (1970) spectacular 75-page book chapter, “the phenomenological philosophy of edmund husserl and contemporary criticism.” loving to read it precisely because it was so difficult and just the thing i needed. writing was still in its infancy, but it seemed an honoured and honourable practice, worth enduring being bad at, worth getting better. this, too, was part of gary’s orbit, a light i needed, cast in just the right direction and angle. some years later, it was gary who invited me to talk at the inaugural meeting of the canadian society for hermeneutics and postmodern thought (created by gary as a sub-division of the canadian philosophical society) in winnipeg, manitoba, summer of 1986, as part of what was then called learned societies conference. “you’d be just the guy to talk about hermeneutics and pedagogy.” well, okay, but not really. it was a terrible talk, frankly. i had been unemployed for just over a year and was facing, in the audience, not only my ma supervisor, but my ph.d. supervisor as well (dr. dieter misgeld, then of o.i.s.e.), as well as, gulp, the hiring committee that i was to have later met from the university of manitoba’s faculty of education. that meeting, i expect partly because of this talk, never took place. all this was agonizingly slowly to shift, because it was also in winnipeg in 1986 that i first met dr. david g. smith, where we recognized in each other a long-lost brother. misplaced glasses of wine with gary and john king (later of the university of calgary press) and david and others lost to memory in a lounge overlooking rising clouds of mosquitos on the river. happenstance. memory. mcmaster university, long evenings at the phoenix graduate student lounge learning to think as if our lives depended on it. and then summer picnics with gary and other students (including my dear gail –we’ve just celebrated our 42nd last december 28th), blistering hot southern ontario heat and cicada whines jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 4 3 (i recall it being 106 degrees fahrenheit one time) and drifting in small creeks, gary giggling at the sight of leeches, and, of course more mosquito-y air. grad school. it’s not that we’ve kept “in touch” at all over several decades now passed. this “in touch” in its colloquial usage isn’t all that is in effect with a teacher, not necessarily, anyway. memory lingers, and voice, and examples, and half-heard sentences or line traces through lineages, citations, underlinings. teachings, and manners of speaking, cadences of words, examples, unvoiced expectations and so on. i’ve always said to prospective teachers that we stand in front of our students, not just as purveyors of teachings, but as an example of how life might turn out. did i mention that gary, unlike so many others at the time in the philosophy department at mcmaster, seemed young, seemed nearly but not quite one of us, or at least facing our way? john thomas, lovely gracious man, full professor, dozing off mid-conversation during a meeting with him, as the late afternoon sun streamed through leaded windows in his corner office of university hall. ian and dave thomas’ father. plato scholar. gentleman. older. gary was 11 years my senior. it is important to consider slowly and well how good teachers set you free from themselves so that you can measure yourself against “the thing itself.” i noticed in gary’s self-composed obituary that “a sizable portion of his estate” was given to the brothers of the good shepherd, in hamilton, ontario. back in the day, i asked him about his for-me-strange holding together of catholicism and existentialism, philosophizing and what, belief? his response was just right: “the life-world is full of contradictions.” that response outlives him and i’ve carried it with me and, like most good teachings, it is still taking years to catch up to it. it still seems in retrospect that gary suffered this particular teaching more than i. circumstance. causes and conditions. too bad, of course, that the contradictions got to be too much between teacher and student. we parted ways decades ago. 35 years+ buddhism insists that good teachers are “pleased by practice” (tsong-kha-pa, 2000, p. 179), so a brief recollection to end, on “the painting in the gate-house.” i recall in a class whose name and date have faded from memory, that gary drew a large rectangle on the chalkboard and asked us to populate it with every conceivable topic we could imagine from our experience of philosophical work. subjects, objects, sense data, god, mathematics, language, ideas, will, emotion, space, time, categories, existence and essence, thought and word, aquinas, immanuel kant, a.j. ayer (who had recently given a talk in convocation hall), images, “the emotions,” and cascades of other names and books and on and on, an ever-expanding picture of it all, in the corner of which gary wrote “etc.” in order to capture that its continuing is part of this picture as well. he then asked about the person making the picture and we sat and roiled and roiled and still roil in this lovely spot. back in that class, it seemed like effort to “get myself into the picture” – the effort at a selfenclosing philosophy that aims to “complete the picture” -is faulty because there is always an existential subjectivity who is picturing this “world picture” (heidegger, 1987). in our class, we tried mightily to add this picturing subjectivity to the picture, but, of course, ended up with a nebulous sense of subjectivity escaping the picture all over again. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 4 4 but, of course, me, at the time, charmed by edmund husserl’s transcendental phenomenology, imagined this nebulous sense to point to a transcendental subjectivity that beheld the world as an array of transcendental intentionalities. like this from that tortuous eugen fink chapter (1970, p. 110): the epoche is not a mundane inhibiting of the ontic and the intramundane belief in the being of the world. as the persistent and radical deactivation of the belief in the world, the epoche is the disconnecting of the belief in the human performer of beliefs, that is, the bracketing of the world-belief’s self interpretation by which it apperceives itself as being in the world. now . . . the true subject of belief can be uncovered for the first time: the transcendental ego, for whom the world (the intramundane subject and the totality of its objects) is a universe of transcendental acceptances. oh i just love reading that over and over! delicious and awful all at once, it still itches a scratch. so in retrospect, i think i’ve had all this somewhat upside-down. we don’t end up with a world-less (i.e., “not in the picture”) subjectivity standing in front of a picture that it is not part of. subjectivity is a by-product of picturing the world and is therefore precisely not something that eludes. it is dependently co-arising, so seeking some sort of recourse in subjectivity is, indirectly, seeking recourse in the penumbra of the very picture/picturing we falsely think we are turning away from in turning to subjectivity. it’s all imaginary, this cycle, this circling, this painting in the gate-house. wrought. getting caught in this circling is itself a by-product of a sense of threat, leading to contraction, reification, hostility, protectiveness, further waves of threat, and so on. and all this, i suggest, is because of a refusal, at to accept the first nobel truth, the reality that all life is suffering, and the squirms to avoid it that then arise: you must accept [suffering] when [it] arise[s] because (1) if you do not do this, in addition to the basic suffering, you have the suffering of worry that is produced by your own thoughts, and then the suffering becomes very difficult for you to bear; (2) if you accept the suffering, you let the basic suffering be and do not stop it, but you never have the suffering of worry that creates discontentment when you focus on the basic suffering; and (3) since you are using a method to bring even basic sufferings into the path, you greatly lessen your suffering, so you can bear it. therefore, it is very crucial that you generate the patience that accepts suffering. (tsong-kha-pa, 2004, pp. 172-173) gary faced something of this eventuality just now, just recently, as we all will. picturing his dying is good practice, but beware. the picture and the picturing and the picturer: all are empty of self-existence, as is this half-remembered reminiscence. i hope, still and now, that gary would have been pleased by this meagre attempt at practice, a little gift to that grin and glinted eye i can still picture in mostly fond, distant memory. those who know me well know full well how much i’d love to raise a glass in good cheer, but i can no longer bear it. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 4 5 references fink, e. (1970). the phenomenological philosophy of edmund husserl and contemporary criticism. in r. o. elveton, the phenomenology of husserl (pp. 73-148). chicago il: quadrangle books. heidegger, m. (1987). the age of the world picture. in m. heidegger, the question concerning technology and other essays (pp. 115-154). new york, ny: garland publishing. husserl, e. (1970). the crisis of european science and transcendental phenomenology. evanston il: northwestern university press. jardine, d. (1976). the question of phenomenological immanence. unpublished master's thesis, department of philosophy, mcmaster university, hamilton, on, canada. on line: www.digitalcommons.mcmaster.ca/opendissertations/4567/. jardine, d., morgan, g., & franklin, m. (1986). analogy, self-identity and family identity: outline of research in progress. canadian journal of education, 11(4), 584-586. jardine, d., & morgan, g. (1987a). analogy as a model for the development of representational abilities in children. educational theory, 37(3), 209-218. jardine, d., & morgan, g. (1987b). analogical thinking in young children and the use of logicomathematical knowledge as a paradigm in jean piaget’s genetic epistemology. quarterly newsletter of the laboratory of comparative human cognition, 9(4), 95-101. tsong-kha-pa (2000). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (lam rim chen mo). vol. 1. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. tsong-kha-pa (2004). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment (lam rim chen mo). vol. 2. ithaca, ny: snow lion publications. microsoft word jardine corrected proof.docx corresponding author: dr. david w. jardine email: jardine@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 24, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 some introductory words for two little earth-cousins david w. jardine out from behind his oxygen mask as if he were just my good old, familiar little earth-cousin. from jodi latremouille, “my treasured relation” cancer really is one of “those” words. two days ago, an old friend, fernando, died of it, and the funeral is this thursday, january 23rd--lung cancer come down hard and fast, as it often does. and then there's me at 8 years old and my mother, 1958, undergoing a radical mastectomy. drawn living room curtains for weeks, a big wicker laundry basket full of neighbors’ tiny presents, one to be opened each day, smells of soaps and lotions and other notions, meant to help stretch out time’s lingering, i guess, and to show wee affections without words, without “that” word. easy to recall how many had to disappear from view, unable to be present to such things. understandable in its own sad way. makes my own skin lesions over the past couple of years seem quite silly in comparison, not only because they are less severe and the suffering is near nil (although hearing “that” word chills nevertheless), but because, at the level of our living and dying, cancer is always incomparable. it follows an old gadamerian (1989, p. 39) adage: “the individual case . . .is not exhausted by being a particular example of a universal law or concept.” my doctor and i joked about how this could be some sort of long-in-arriving anniversary--maybe even the summer of 1958, too much sun swimming at the second tower with my brother and father in burlington, and the great peels of skin afterwards. funny how cancer takes its time sometimes, sometimes as fleet as the quick of life itself, and sometimes, well, as sheer chance would have it, my mother lived till 2002. of course, as jodi latremouille’s wonderful, heartbreaking writing “my treasured relation” demonstrates, broad, universal concepts and images and ideas are always needed in the act of jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 1 2 articulating one's experience. we always run the risk of using words that can be understood differently than we meant. this circumstance is in the very nature of writing and reading itself and it is why the mens auctoris is not the lynchpin of hermeneutic work (gadamer, 2007, p. 57). it is also why hermeneutic research is so bloody difficult. you have to be disciplined and rigorous and attentive to handle this circumstance gracefully and well. remaining true to the intimacy of this “special case” (gadamer, 1989, p. 39), dear shelby, is an especially difficult form of research that requires generosity, patience, perseverance, discipline, stillness and wisdom (6 aspired to “perfections,” [sanskrit: paramitas; see tsong-kha-pa, 2000, 2002, 2004]). all clustered, of course, around impermanence. “we will have to hold firmly to the standpoint of finiteness” (gadamer, 1989, p. 99), both in the topics we consider and in the expended breath of our consideration itself. why? because the topic of a hermeneutic study is finite as is our insight into it. “future generations will understand differently” (p. 340) and therefore, the purpose of a hermeneutic inquiry is to “keep [the topic] open for the future” (p. 340). we already know this. cancer will never leave our consciousness. there are myriad ways of experiencing it, articulating it, investigating it, naming it, and these have cascaded down to us over time, admixed, sometimes battling each other, sometimes quelled, finally, in the soft presence of death. we can never say once and for all what needs to be said, and the worlds of swimming and breast cancer in 1958 have turned out to be something different than we could have imagined. “it would be a poor hermeneuticist who thought he could have, or had to have, the last word” (gadamer, 1989a, p. 579). in this sense, “my treasured relation” is hermeneutic in its best light. it is intent on remaining true to the “stubborn particularity” (wallace, 1987) of the case while, at the same time, drawing us into the worlds of its orbit in which we, as readers, already live. and, at once, it casts us back on our own life in this troubled life world--all this with an eye to both the opening this topic and “find[ing] that opening in each of us” (wallace, 1987, p. 13), as readers, where we can experience our own “miraculous returns” (p. 13) to the lives we have already been leading. this complex and pitched spiral of effects that defines the rigorousness of hermeneutic inquiry has an axis. its goal is to remain true to its object, and jodi latremouille's writing finds this sweet and aching spot. it seeks the address of this case and that's what compels our attention and makes this compelling break out beyond the confines of the case to something that feels universal. but this is no longer a slippery universal full of romantic woozyness. it is a universal that has been, in the best senses, humiliated by the case. life. childhood. illness. relations. suffering. all these become disciplined and strengthened by the case itself. “it is truly an achievement of undemonstrable tact to hit the target and to discipline the application of the universal” (gadamer, 1989, pp. 39-40). without this discipline of application, phrases like “childhood leukemia” loses the function of “responding and summoning” (gadamer, 1989, p. 458). they become hard categories of illness, and our responses to them become subjectivized into nothing but “moist gastric intimacy” (sartre, 1970, p. 4). these are the two extremes that hermeneutics avoids, and the two degradations that it can fall into when it fails. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 1 3 jodi latremouille's work thus reminds us of a hermeneutic truth, that one must avoid the temptations of casting our eyes too high. and, as with another recent piece of writing (latremouille, in press), her work reminds us, too, of another feature of hermeneutics: to be properly understood and articulated,. . . locales of intimacy don't lend themselves to forms of research that demand generalities or methodological anonymity as is proper to various social sciences. they demand a form of research that is proper to the object of its concern--an old aristotelian idea, that knowledge must “remain something adapted to the object, a mensuratio ad rem” (gadamer, 1989, p. 261). (jardine, in press) a good interpretation must be adapted to the object it is considering. pediatric oncology can be understood as a medical condition and, understood as such it summons a certain way of writing/speaking/investigating that is proper to that object. but the cancer of a child is also understandable as a sphere of treasured relations filled with this child and no other. this is also what it is. in this case, precisely as in the case of medical research, good writing seeks its proper measure in this object of consideration. there is no battle here between types of research and all that worn-out piffle about qualitative and quantitative. one of these is not the “secret measure” (gadamer, 1989, p. 112) of the other. both forms of writing and research are “objective” in the sense that both seek to cleave properly to the object each is considering. both seek to do justice to the thing and bring it to an illumination proper to it. both therefore are “hermeneutic” in the sense that they both heed the demand of the mensuratio ad rem. differently put, not only is all oncology hermeneutic (moules, jardine, mccaffrey, & brown, 2013). cancer, as it actually lives in the world (of families, of medicine, of nursing, of philosophy, of economics, of the tremors felt over diagnosis, of the bedsides, of the ways the word can find air in some settings of fear and trembling) is myriad in its being. it therefore requires myriad articulations in order to be properly understood in its fulsome being. “only in the multifariousness of such voices does it exist” (gadamer, 1989, p. 284). hermeneutic work always involves the application of particular cases to the universals (concepts, images, hopes, desires, ideas, rules, laws, principles, themes, procedures, guidelines, expectations voice and unvoiced, and so on) that have come to guide our lives, demanding of them that they listen to the difference that the case portends and don't turn away to heavenly, self-enclosed ideation (jardine, 2013). but it involves another form of application. “understanding always involves something like applying the text to be understood to the interpreter’s present situation” (gadamer, 1989, p. 308). in reading this paper, i’m blessed with the meeting of these two earthcousins that make me remember that i, too, and however near or distant, am a third earth cousin in this fatal round. interpretive work is meant to be read interpretively. read this and let yourself be third. references gadamer, h.g. (1989). truth and method (2nd rev. ed., j. weinsheimer & d. g. marshall, trans.). new york, ny: continuum. jardine journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 1 4 gadamer, h.g. (2007). classical and philosophical hermeneutics. in r.e. palmer (ed.), the gadamer reader: a bouquet of the later writings, (pp. 41-71). evanston, il: northwestern university press. jardine, d. (2013). guest editorial: morning thoughts on application. journal of applied hermeneutics. retrieved from http://jah.synergiesprairies.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/52. jardine, d. (in press). in appreciation of modern hunting traditions and a grouse’s life unwasted. one world in dialogue. moules, n.j., jardine, d.w., mccaffrey, g., & brown, c. (2013). “isn’t all oncology hermeneutic?” journal of applied hermeneutics. retrieved from http://jah.synergiesprairies.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/view/43. latremouille, j. (in press). a modern hunting tradition. one world in dialogue. sartre, j.p. (1970). intentionality: a fundamental idea in husserl’s phenomenology. journal for the british society for phenomenology, 1(2), 3-5. tsong-kha-pa (2000). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume one. ithaca, ny: snow lion. tsong-kha-pa (2002). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume three. ithaca, ny: snow lion. tsong-kha-pa (2004). the great treatise on the stages of the path to enlightenment. volume two. ithaca, ny: snow lion. wallace, b. (1989). the stubborn particulars of grace. toronto, on, canada: mcclelland & stewart. microsoft word mccaffrey moules corrected proof .docx 1 university of calgary, faculty of nursing corresponding author: graham mccaffrey, rn phd email: gpmccaff@ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics january 2, 2016 ©the author(s) 2016 encountering the great problems in the street: enacting hermeneutic philosophy as research in practice disciplines graham mccaffrey1, rn, phd & nancy j. moules1, rn, phd abstract in this paper, we speak to tenets of gadamerian hermeneutic philosophy that “guide” our hermeneutic inquiry in research that seeks to understand the complexity of human experiences. in our conduct of hermeneutic research, we grapple with “great problems” and encounter the human difficulty of topics such as childhood cancer, grief, mental illness, education and schools, arts and humanities, and other topics that show up in practice professions of nursing, teaching, social work, or psychology. keywords hermeneutic research, hermeneutic philosophy, hans-georg gadamer, nursing, qualitative research, applied hermeneutics of all actions, those performed for a purpose have been least understood, no doubt because they have always been counted the most understandable and are to our consciousness the most commonplace. the great problems are to be encountered in the street. (nietzsche, 1881/1982, p. 78) in 2015, dr. john caputo introduced us to a society hosted out of villanova university called the north american society for philosophical hermeneutics (nasph), a society interested in mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 2 philosophical hermeneutics in particular that of hans-georg gadamer. the focus of the 2015 10th annual meeting was “the future(s) of hermeneutics” and we decided to submit a paper offering our perspectives and approaches that involve applied hermeneutics. although the paper was not accepted for the meeting, one of the authors (moules) attended the meeting and was surprised to find that many members of the group were aware of, and very interested in, the work that is being done in this area and, in particular, being done by the work of the canadian hermeneutic institute (chi) and the journal of applied hermeneutics (jah). through taking up the task of articulating what “applied hermeneutics” in practice disciplines means to a new audience, we subsequently realized we had also written a reflective account of developments in applied hermeneutics since the founding of the chi in 2009. what follows is a version of that account, published for the fifth anniversary of jah in 2016. in the ways we have embraced hermeneutics in an applied sense, hermeneutics is not really concerned with itself as a philosophy but rather with how we make sense of philosophy in a way that is applied in living examples. like the mandate of this journal, we take up gadamerian hermeneutics in its application to topics that inhabit our lives and professions, interpreting living examples of being in the world. this is the act of philosophy and catching it in the act and action of human concerns (caputo, 2015; moules & mccaffrey, 2015). what is the basis for our claim of a fit between hermeneutics and a practice discipline like nursing? one answer to this question is that the type of questions we endeavor to answer – or perhaps we should say, to respond to – hermeneutically are invariably about relationships. what, for example, are the effects of childhood cancer irrupting into a family, on grandparents, on the parental couple, on romantic/intimate partners of adolescents with cancer, on adolescent sexuality? gadamerian hermeneutics in particular, with its insistence on the centrality of dialogue in opening up understanding, both echoes the topic of interest and the means of generating data by interview. none of this is to say that we have a naïve understanding that dialogue automatically or smoothly opens the door to understanding; we are interested in our research in the said and the unsaid, in elisions, silences, and contradictions; we are aware of the distortions introduced into the possibility of “genuine conversation” (gadamer, 2004, p. 385) by power differentials and the prescriptive goals of the research interview. hermeneutics allows us – requires us to regard relationships as complex, dynamic, contextual, and historical and, in doing so, helps us to avoid the twin traps of complacently seeking our own goodness or berating ourselves for falling short of idealized conceptions of ourselves as self-sacrificing nurses or teachers. this is to consider dialogue and relationship literally as interactions between persons and, at this literal level, we speak to nietzsche’s claim that “the great problems are to be encountered in the street” (1881/1982, p. 78) or in the classroom, the hospital, or the living room amongst everyday interactions in which something is at stake for individuals. hermeneutics also allows us – requires us – to regard these interactions in the fullness of their historical moment and matrices of cultural associations. one of the weaknesses of much research in nursing that claims to be hermeneutic is that it misses this point and resides too much in the personal, ignoring gadamer’s admonition that “the self awareness of the individual is only a flickering in the closed circuit of historical life” (2004, p. 278). in exploring the relationships between nurses and patients on mental health units, for example, the hegemony of biomedical psychiatry is played out in the significance accorded to mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 3 the role of nurses in giving medications to patients. it is a role that is taken very seriously, a moment in which the nurse simultaneously exercises power over the patient and is acted upon (carrying out medical orders) since she or he will be called to account for omissions or errors. by contrast, the level of participation in therapeutic conversations with patients is highly dependent on local unit cultures and is often more or less optional and only weakly connected to the goals and aspirations of patients. histories of subordination, supervision, confinement, as well as weaker traditions of the therapeutic potential of language are enacted in everyday rituals that privilege certain activities over others. relationship is often the locus of hermeneutic application to practice disciplines around specific questions or topics, but we would argue beyond this for a more intimate and deeper sense of application in the nature of practice disciplines as such. we will explore this in terms of nursing since that is our discipline, but we would expect that teachers, social workers, or psychologists could make equivalent arguments. in truth and method (1960/2004), gadamer used the law as an exemplar for hermeneutics as an applied philosophy law being a well established branch of the human sciences as well as a respectable, bürgerlich profession. in his long subsequent career, he elaborated upon his hermeneutic philosophy to many different audiences, including physicians and some of those lectures were collected in the english volume the enigma of health (1996). medicine has also been studied through a hermeneutic lens by fredrik svenaeus (2000) who argued that clinical medicine should be seen as a practice “which can be best understood as an interpretive meeting between health-care personnel and patient with the aim of healing the ill person seeking help” (p. 2). although here he used the ecumenical expression “health care personnel,” he makes it clear throughout the work that he is talking about medicine, and that other disciplines such as nursing are treated, somewhat apologetically, as approximate sub-types of medicine. the view of nursing as existing in relation to medicine, if acknowledged as a separate discipline at all, is important from a hermeneutic point of view. we are able to hear ourselves and to reflect upon the place from which we speak by understanding ourselves as nurses in relation to other professions, other disciplines and our own histories. nursing as a discipline within academia continues to hold a somewhat provisional place. the idea that registered nurses should have a degree level education is still relatively new and is not always the case in every jurisdiction. when one of the authors (mccaffrey) was studying for his doctorate in nursing, he often encountered surprise that there was such a phenomenon as a phd in nursing. a sense of ambiguity in relation to the status of nursing is not simply a problem of those on the outside. amongst ourselves, nurses cannot resist picking at a wound of self-identity; new classes of graduate students, arriving as confident clinical practitioners, find themselves thrown back into the existential anxiety of the question, “what is nursing?” one of the reasons for this uncertainty is that nursing has one foot firmly in the natural sciences and one just as firmly in – what shall we say, the human sciences, the humanities, the geisteswissenschaften? the interrelation between what we do and how we do it – so immediately apparent in every patient's story of an indifferent or a compassionate nurse – is a vortex at the heart of nursing. we offer as a provisional answer to the question “what is nursing?” an acceptance of the ambivalence and the uncertainty, of the “flux” to borrow caputo’s term. under the influence of hermeneutics, we have come to understand nursing as a dialogue with itself before it is actualized in the dialogue between nurse and patient. against the essentializing voices in nursing that would say it is ultimately a matter of technical mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 4 proficiency, or of individuals having a compassionate nature, we say that it is a dialogue that has no last word. nursing is a condition of interpretive instability, saturated with possibility and concomitant anxiety, in the moment that it is both academic discipline and practice profession. having arrived at this point, which feels very abstract, nursing always has to manifest in practice according to the telos of helping patients (these are placeholder terms: “helping” being the broadest and simplest term to encompass the multivariate activities of contemporary nursing and “patients” standing, according to context, for client or family or community or simply person). flux is not the same as meaninglessness, and nursing is a recognizable human activity with the stamp of responding to needs related to health and illness. nursing is an embodied and enacted social function that entails distinct, if widely varied, kinds of actions, prescriptive legal and ethical frameworks of permission and obligation, as well as more subtle codes of language and behaviour. one of gadamer’s concepts that speaks most naturally to nurses is his retrieval of phronesis, or practical wisdom. nursing done well demonstrates the exercise of judgment in the moment, drawing upon knowledge of various kinds, and applying it judiciously and helpfully according to the contours of the unique instance. one of the authors (mccaffrey) was teaching a class of undergraduate students who were working in clinical placements in long-term care centres. during a discussion of how ethics entered into the formation of judgment for nurses, one student brought up an incident that she had found troubling. a healthcare aide had brought a commode (toilet in a chair on wheels) to a resident and because she could not find the pot that fitted into the commode, she had used a garbage can for the resident to urinate into. the student felt discomfited by seeing this, thinking that although it met a functional purpose, there was a falling away of respect for the dignity of the resident in the failure to provide the proper equipment. she had responded by going to find the pot that was part of the commode and using it correctly. we have described this minor incident from practice deliberately because it is minor; phronesis, however, does not demand grandeur of scale, or life and death consequences. it does demand a refinement of sensibility, an acuity of perception that has to be practiced over and over, so that it is precisely in the capacity to practice in the smallest of cases that it is more likely to be practiced at all. these understandings of nursing and of other practice disciplines have not been achieved easily or quickly. we are not philosophers in the strict sense of the discipline. we are nurses and educators. however, we study and teach on gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, and we apply philosophical tenets to our teaching, discipline, and our research. in 2009, drs. nancy johnson, debbie mcleod, and nancy moules co-founded the canadian hermeneutic institute (www.chiannual.com) with the intent to bring together scholars of hermeneutics and hermeneutic research across disciplines in creative dialogue and conversations of philosophy, research, and practice. each year we gather with a visiting scholar of hermeneutics: drs. david jardine, john caputo, richard kearney, james olthuis, gail weiss, nicholas davey, and jean grondin to date. during these gatherings we have discovered that these renowned scholars were sometimes surprised to find that nurses, social workers, psychologists, administrators, and teachers were interested in hermeneutics and perhaps even more surprised to learn that we had for over two decades been conducting research guided by gadamerian hermeneutics. in these meetings, as we speak to our topics of concern and research, there is a sense of what caputo (2015) identified as mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 5 the “‘hermeneutic situation’ in the concrete, glowing white hot and jumping off the pages of the philosophy books” (p. xi). dr. richard kearney aptly named this “applied hermeneutics” and encouraged us in 2011 to launch a journal, the journal of applied hermeneutics, which now moves to its sixth year of publication. the work published in the journal ranges from philosophical papers to more practical interpretations of aspects of our disciplines that speak to human conditions of living. in 2014, we along with two colleagues received a book contract with peter lang publishing to write conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice (moules, mccaffrey, field, & laing, 2015). in the book, we speak to tenets of gadamerian philosophy that “guide” our approach to understanding the complexity of the human experience. we conduct research around topics such as childhood cancer, grief, mental illness, education and schools, arts and humanities, and other topics that show up in practice professions of nursing, teaching, social work, and psychology. in the discipline of nursing, we have been guided by gadamer’s work for over 20 years; the dissertations in nursing alone are prolific. some of the topics from our own faculty of nursing at the university of calgary that have been researched hermeneutically include: families and cardiac disease; therapeutic letters in family systems nursing; grief and family therapy; spirituality and family systems nursing; commendations in family systems nursing; advance care planning; experiences of families with children with progressive life limiting illness; buddhism and mental health nursing; vicarious trauma on nurses working in mental health; family systems nursing for families with a child with cancer; families living with a family member with treatable but incurable cancer; children’s cancer camps; family presence during resuscitation; sexuality, relationships and spinal cord injury; grandparents’ experiences of childhood cancer; impacts of deaths of children on pediatric oncology nurses; and many more topics that are too numerous to name and reference. we have several current studies looking at aspects of families’ experiences of childhood cancer, and the use of arts in teaching. in the book, we speak to starting from a place of philosophy: what does gadamer have to teach us about “being methodical and following leads” (moules et al., 2015, pp. 55-69)? gadamer certainly did not lay out a method for hermeneutic research. in fact, he might be surprised too to find it in nursing or in research at all. he did, however, offer ideas around universality and finitude, historically effected consciousness, language and linguistic being, conversation and dialogue, questions, play, prejudices, the hermeneutic circle, erlebnis and erfahrung, bildung, fusion of horizons, application and phronesis, and transformation into structure. each of these ideas has something to say to us in the conduct of good hermeneutic research. in the book, we suggest guidelines, not as scientific method, which gadamer questioned as the ultimate authority, but as an orientation for direction, much like stars serve for navigation, that which “serves to steady the motion of a thing or journey” (moules et al., 2015, p. 61). guidelines are not methodological imperatives. they are in the service of steady, dependable motion. they are not meant to displace good judgment or extinguish experience…offered in the service of practice and …of the phenomenon. (moules et al., 2015, p. 61) mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 6 the guidelines offered are: 1. the way of hermeneutic practice is determined by the phenomenon, not the method 2. hermeneutic practice requires a disciplined (phenomenological) focus on the particular 3. hermeneutic practice requires that we be vigilant and open in our encounters with the lifeworld 4. reading in the hermeneutic tradition involves a practice of learning to read self and world differently 5. the nature of hermeneutic practice is dialogical. (pp. 62-68) in our work of applied hermeneutics, we are addressed by topics of human concern and practice concern. we answer to this address in the sense of caputo’s ideas of obligation (caputo, 1993) and his thinking “in radical hermeneutics everything turns on saying ‘come’ to the coming of what we cannot see coming, of the unforeseeable” (caputo, 2015, p. ix). with this address, we seek out those who can best inform us around the topic – it may be participants who are interviewed (e.g., grandparents of a child with cancer) or it may be other literature, poetry, films, or documents. if participants are interviewed, we audio tape the interviews and transcribe them and then we approach the text hermeneutically, seeking understanding not explanation. this is not like analysis in other traditions and there are no procedural guidelines that save one from interpretation. it is not looking for themes that are determined or authenticated by repetition, nor is it looking for semantic codes, constructs, or theories. interpretation rather seeks to open understanding, to expose what was lost or forgotten or never seen. it is the work of aletheia. aletheia is a word that is about unconcealment…we have to face the living presence of what we come to suffer or as kearney and caputo suggest – a preparedness to meet the stranger at the door who may be kind or may be a monster. there is hospitality to aletheia – an openness to what might come to, and maybe enter, the door. (moules, 2015, p. 4) what we think caputo was referring to in the foreword of conducting hermeneutic research is the actionability of applied hermeneutics. when philosophy is taken to practice, to human contexts, situations, and suffering – to the great problems that are encountered in the streets, hospitals, homes, or schools it becomes more than words and ideas; it becomes alive, applied, and active. we think that understanding this very thing was at the heart of gadamer’s endeavor and is at the heart of research using hermeneutics. references caputo, j.d. (1993). against ethics: contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. bloomington, in: indiana university press. caputo, j.d. (2015). foreword: the wisdom of hermeneutics. in n.j. moules, g. mccaffrey, j.c. field, & c.m. laing, conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice (pp. ixxiii). new york, ny: peter lang. gadamer, h-g. (1996). the enigma of health (j. gaiger & n. walker, trans.). stanford, mccaffrey & moules journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 article 1 7 ca: stanford university press. gadamer, h-g. (1960/2004). truth and method (j. weinsheimer & d.g. marshall, trans.). london, uk: continuum. moules, n.j. (2015. editorial: aletheia – remembering and enlivening. journal of applied hermeneutics. editorial 2. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy5qr4p68 moules, n.j. & mccaffrey, g. (2015). editorial: catching hermeneutics in the act. journal of applied hermeneutics, editorial 1. http://hdl.handle.net/10515/sy53n20w8 moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. nietzsche, f. (1982). daybreak: thoughts on the prejudices of morality (r.j. hollingdale, trans.). cambridge, uk: cambridge university press. svenaeus, f. (2000). the hermeneutics of medicine and the phenomenology of health. norwell, ma: kluwer academic. corresponding author: graham mccaffrey, rn, phd email: gpmccaff@ ucalgary.ca journal of applied hermeneutics october 25, 2016 the author(s) 2016 invited guest editorial: nursing as interpretation graham mccaffrey the two papers that correspond to this editorial were written by graduate students in a hermeneutic research class in the faculty of n ursing at the university of calgary. the class is one locus of the account of applied hermeneutics that has developed thro ugh the canadian hermeneutic institute, the journal of applied hermeneutics, and the book conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice (moules, mccaffrey, field & laing, 2015). the course is open to both master’s and doctoral students and is interdisciplinary, attracting students mainly from nursing, education, and counselling psychology, and occasionally from other disciplines including sociology, kinesiology, social work, and engineering. we teach about the philosophical background of hermeneutics, with a focus on gadamer, and then how concepts can be applied to the conduct of research. what brings the course to life, however, is the range of backgrounds and interests of the students that invariably create a culture of stimulating discussion as they – and the instructors – discover new ideas about their own interests through the encounters with cross cutting themes arriving from unexpected places. the first assignment given to students is to write a paper on the topic of, “nursing…counselling psychology … education… is an interpretive practice,” which is intended to help students to start putting together hermeneutic philosophy with their lived experience of, and expertise in, the practice of their own discipline and profession. the following two papers were both written in response to the question, by students in the master of nursing program at the university of calgary. both lead authors are nurses working in practice, and so each of them is intimately involved in a highly localized world of professional knowledge and application, as is evident from their writing. the settings are quite different, mental health outreach nursing for whitney mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 6 2 turcato and neonatal transport nursing for jaime caswell, yet they each succeed in showing the deeply interpretive nature of their work. if there is one concept that most comes to mind to me in reading their papers, it is phronesis or practical wisdom. each author presents a phenomenological description of an event in practice, capturing thought processes, actions, and the dynamic network of relationships in which practice is formed. these are not only descriptions of phronesis, but reports from inside events of phronesis, that vividly convey the nuanced and rapid way expert judgments of subtle human interactions come about in combination with the precise, and therapeutic application of technical knowledge. whitney turcato’s paper begins with a nurse being woken by a call from a client in the small hours. what happens next is a dialogue in which, as she goes on to explain, she already knows a good deal about the person on the end of the line and is able to interpret his words and formulate her own in the light of that knowledge. possibilities for hermeneutic work present themselves immediately, in dialogue as the means of understanding, in language freighted with meanings beyond and beneath the overt definitions of words, and in the question of reception raised by the irruption of the other into the nurse’s night. gadamer, kearney, and caputo, to name but t hree, are ready and waiting to provide ways into understanding what goes in the exchange. one of the aspects of the paper that struck me most forcefully on first reading, and on subsequent readings, is the use of humour. it is a good portrayal of the humour that passes between mental health nurses, as i know from my own practice, smoothly incorporated into the style of the narrative sections of the paper. the humour has something of the absurd, of laughing at human folly but not at any particular person; it has a bonding function between the nurses, and is underwritten by care and sensitivity towards the situation of the client. humour in mental health nursing is one of many potential theses that are seeded in the paper – if i were to continue along that path, i would start with gadamer’s discussion of play, then maybe read some beckett… jaime caswell demonstrates a similar gift for the phenomenological narrative. she takes the reader quickly into a working day in her lifeworld as a neonatal transport nurse. sections of her paper read as good nursing drama, giving out just enough information to the uninitiated to follow the action without slowing it down. within and beyond her narrative, there emerge problems embedded in everyday practices: the question of how to balance scientific knowledge and sensitivity to parents’ powerful feelings, the diplomacy of being the big city nurse in a smaller centre, all of this perceived, considered, and acted upon against the clock. towards the end of the paper, jaime shows us the image of the nurse handing the baby to the mother, and deftly plays with the literal and metaphorical senses of “handing over.” with this sensitivity to words, she introduces a mobilizing image, which again might be the seed of a potential thesis. in class, following jaime discussing this image, we found ourselves echoing the idea of handing-over in different contexts, involuntarily using the gesture of hands together, palms raised, offering up and passing on. thus, ideas are passed from practice to practice, person to person, and our horizons of understanding ripple and shift as new possibilities come into view. the purpose of the assignment is simply to have students reflect on their own area of practice, and to begin to explore the interpretability of the familiar. these two papers are fine examples of practitioners discovering for themselves, and for us as readers, the proliferative meanings hidden in everyday practices. mccaffrey journal of applied hermeneutics 2016 editorial 6 3 references moules, n.j., mccaffrey, g., field, j.c., & laing, c.m. (2015). conducting hermeneutic research: from philosophy to practice. new york, ny: peter lang. microsoft word williamson field corrected proof 2.docx 1 university of calgary corresponding author: w. john williamson email: wjohn.williamson@cssd.ab.ca journal of applied hermeneutics february 27, 2014 ©the author(s) 2014 the case of the disappearing/appearing slow learner: an interpretive mystery w. john williamson1 & jim field1 abstract this interpretive essay attempts to demonstrate the potential good that might come from approaching a hermeneutic phenomenological study as a hard-boiled detective story in the tradition of raymond chandler. the authors attempt to explain the hermeneutic warrants for such an adventure—that is, for how and why a topic like the categorization and treatment of students in the public education system as “slow learners” might be approached as a detective story. the parallels between detective fiction, chandler’s work as a noir novelist, and hermeneutics are drawn out. attention is drawn to the ground of our interpretive relationship with the world in heidegger’s notion of the “as structure” of interpretation. a case is made for seeing the hardboiled detective story as a hermeneutic venue for shaking up commonsense understandings of how we have come to see and do education with those students designated as slow in their learning. keywords fiction, hermeneutics, mystery stylistically, one of the many interesting and “novel” things about applied hermeneutic research is how it can challenge the boundaries of what might be loosely called “formal academic writing.” hermeneutic work, because it is committed to the notion of truth as “the radiance of the beautiful” (gadamer, 2004, p. 479), and the appreciation of the poetic nature of truth (heidegger, 1962), often spills over into the more aesthetic side of writing. hermeneutic research is highly personal (moules, 2002), in the sense that with each hermeneutic encounter researchers become more williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 2 attuned to the possibilities inherent in their future encounters. researchers become, to paraphrase gadamer (2004), better able to have experiences and learn from them. the transformation and reorganization of experience is at the heart of hermeneutic work, and one of the senses of application that gadamer (2004) described. in this way, the personal in hermeneutics boldly and baldly asserts the value of the authors’ experiences, not as hermetic traps sealing the researchers up inside the “circuits of historical life” as gadamer (2004, p. 278) has so elegantly stated, but as a way to cultivate the very opposite: the competency to have an encounter with the truth of a living topic located in that vast and fluid landscape known as the human condition. just as the art of the visual or the literary addresses its themes obliquely in their complexity, hermeneutic research rarely offers straightforward solutions to the issues it discusses, at times openly opposing the very idea of straightforward solutions to complex human dilemmas. its application comes to fruition when it is able to “restore life to its original difficulty” (caputo, 1987, p.1), that is, when it helps us see life as such difficult, tragic, but not impossible as caputo (1987) has said, but instead full of possibility. this is often accomplished through writing that is lyrical, metaphoric, playful and, above all, evocative. as jardine (2012) both claimed and continues to demonstrate: hermeneutic work treats its topics like works of art that gather up our festive returns, topics that, in return for our attention and devotion, begin to glow in response to the attention we have bestowed upon them. (p. 3) the quote may seem to make hermeneutics an approach steeped in romanticism. it certainly has been criticized on these grounds. habermas (in bernstein, 2002, p. 273) has accused gadamer of “engaging in a sentimental nostalgia for past traditions and epochs" in, and derrida (in bernstein, 2002, p. 273) has claimed gadamer was naive in his belief that dialogue can yield unity, coherence, and structure, and as such “gloss over the hetereogeneities and abysses that confront us”. it would be un-hermeneutic to deny these risks, however, we continue to assert the opportunity for the unflinching and compassionate honesty that hermeneutic work offers. it can be about the sharpest pain we can experience as humans: the loss of something or someone that makes getting on with one’s life, for the moment anyways, unimaginable (moules, 2009). for all its reliance on metaphor and joy, hermeneutics begins with the assumption that peoples’ suffering is real (davey, 2006). so we offer another bold claim that comes perhaps too early to be believed: when it works, hermeneutics is, in all its instances, applied, and its application occurs at a precise moment. according to risser (1997), “application is not a simple matter of following a procedure as one follows a recipe, but a matter of perceiving what is at stake in a situation” (p.107). it is here that life returns in all its difficulty because seeing what is at stake is not a given; blindness is the more likely outcome, especially without the help of the other. the topic of this paper, borne out of 15 years of one of the authors working as a teacher with struggling students and students with diagnosed disabilities, could broadly be construed as an investigation into the phenomenon of slow learners, viewed as mysteries to be lived with rather than problems to be solved, as they are so often construed in educational discourse. this, however, says too much and too little, as formal explanations are want to do with mysteries, because there are missing people involved here that we are determined to “find” so to speak. let us try to recover them briefly and at the same time to speak to their disappearance. williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 3 the language of seeing learners as slow “slow learner” is an educational label that describes a psycho-educational category of students testing in the low-average range of intellectual functioning (king, 2006). predicted to struggle in school due to having intellectual functioning one category below the average range, slow learners are nevertheless categorically excluded from special education supports and services. while learners categorized as special needs when engaged in regular curriculum are eligible for enhanced tracking, supportive programming and academic accommodation (alberta education, 2004), the only programming alternative for slow learners, who are unable to keep up with regular curriculum, that is offered is a set of vocational electives called knowledge and employability (k & e) classes. these classes culminate in a different credential than the higher status and better-known alberta high school diploma (alberta education, 2008). such disparity might simply be addressed as an apparent gap in educational services, but what is also at stake here is the taken for granted-ness of educational categories such as “slow learner” and “learning disabled.” in education, they exist as empirical givens. what is forgotten here is that categories like this are socially constructed, and exist as historically-affected institutional practices (danforth, 2006). even if these categories also signify measurable learning deficits, as educators we tend to forget that there is no pedagogy attached to them. who these people are has not been revealed through a label, and the mystery of what to do for them has not been solved. a disability studies perspective serves to remind us that, while an individual may have a distinct physical or intellectual impairment, disability itself is, partially at least, a function of the barriers that are created by institutional responses or lack thereof to the individual’s particular impairment (dunn, 2010). life itself does not come with a label; it presents challenges to us all that sometimes we can overcome, but that often “disable” even the most capable of us. therefore we ask: who among us can ever claim that they are always able, never “slow” or “impaired” in life? moreover, the use of these kinds of labels in education, because of their implied permanence, that is, because they assume that someone is always and everywhere disabled, or slow if labeled as such, has been critiqued because it can create negative stereotypes, which result in many cases to self-fulfilling prophesies (danforth, 2006). the situation is both more complicated and simple than this—these students, left on their own in a system infamous for its inflexibility and lack of accommodation for individual differences of all types, are likely to struggle and fail in regular classes (couture, 2012). this means that the kind of educational support they need requires funding, and garnering funds requires that these students be categorized and labeled (gilham & williamson, 2013). here is the dilemma: if we label these students, making them “appear” as it were, we may be doing them harm, and if we do not, and we allow them to simply “disappear,” we may be doing them harm. we are confronted with the possibility of propagating evil, both as “suffering” and “wrong-doing” (kearney, 2003, p. 84), on either path. it appears to be “a devil’s bargain from the start” (robbins, 2007, p. 6), one that escapes our ability to make sense of it because it is the thing (no thing) we cannot get around, both in the sense of something we cannot avoid running into somewhere along the way and in the sense of something we cannot surround, circumscribe, or encompass with our concepts. it is what is left over, the radical hermeneutic residuum which conceptual thinking and planning can never exhaust, include, and assimilate. it is the moment of withdrawal (ent-zug), which inhabits everywilliamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 4 thing that is “given,” the absence (abwesen, ab-esse) in everything which we try to summon into presence (anwesen, prae-esse) (caputo, 1987, p. 270). yet, in a taken for granted kind of way, it does make sense, in that we regularly proceed in schools as if everything was right and just, as if the absence /presence, thing/nothing of slow learners did not call for careful investigation in each and every case. it appears to be, as caputo (1987) claimed, a mystery, one that claims us, one that requires that we be open to both its presence and absence, or more essentially to “the unsettling fluctuation between the two” (p. 270). all well and good, we might say, at the level of ought and should, but how are we supposed to accomplish this-how are we to understand this mystery, or at the least, where might we turn for help in making our way through? heidegger (1962) and gadamer’s (2004) response to this question was to turn to metaphor, or more accurately perhaps, to acknowledge that our language and thus our relationship to the world and to understanding is deeply metaphorical. all understanding, heidegger (1962) boldly asserted in being and time, “has the structure of something-as-something,” that is, it is meaningful already. weinsheimer (1985) put it beautifully: we do not hear pure sounds, but a car in the street, a baby crying; we do not see pure colors or shapes, but always a face, a knife, a wreath of smoke. … perception understands, and understanding involves the construal of something as something. (p. 94) if understanding is metaphorical, it is also playful, as gadamer (2004) reminded us, but not playful as the uncommitted toying of an individual subject with an object (vilhauer, 2011). in line with gadamer’s thinking, we are not proposing here simply to play with the topic, like a cat does with a mouse, but also to be played by it like someone caught up in an event, in what vilhauer (2011) called “a dance of mutual responsiveness” (p. 33). this dance is as schwandt (2007) reminded us is a dialectic of transcendence and appropriation. on the one hand, as one gives oneself to the play, one becomes fascinated with the world and loses oneself in the game or play. the play takes over, determining possibilities and moving the player into the unknown. on the other hand, play affects a kind of self-discovery; it reveals possibilities to the player and thus is a kind of self-transformation. being at play or the event of play is like being in a genuine conversation or dialogue with a text or another person. play is thus an analogy for the event of understanding. (p. 228) we hope that through this play, the meaning of the topic (die sache), or better perhaps, the topic in play, might emerge more fully. it is this hermeneutic offering, of the possibility of understanding something differently, that we wish to take up in addressing the topic of slow learners through the medium of a fictionalized, stylized narrative in the tradition of hard-boiled detective fiction. it is provisionally titled “the case of the appearing/disappearing slow learners: an interpretive mystery.” williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 5 though seeing the phenomenon of slow learners as a stylized mystery may seem risky or excessively speculative (and yet caputo [1987] made the case that avoiding speculation is nothing short of being cowardly and irresponsible), we offer this as an alternative to the way special education/diverse learner discourse sees slow learners, a way that many have accused of being extremely limited, hubristic, and pernicious in that there is a tacit acceptance of the way things are (couture, 2012; danforth, 2006; dunn, 2010, graham & slee, 2008). specifically from a disability studies perspective, these approaches seem to operate on the principle of metonymy, or the substitution of one characteristic, perhaps a student’s discreet impairment or some proposed intervention, for the complex whole of their being. the substitution conceals the problematic nature of the operation. through our alternate “seeing as,” we hope to explore this phenomenon metaphorically in an attempt to cast a different light, to broaden and deepen the educational conversation about slow learners. similarly, we offer the extended metaphor of the hard-boiled detective story as one unsettling way of interpreting the phenomenon of slow learners and broader process of educational classification in alberta’s schools. we hope to find our own forms of renewal in this meaning-making, to inspire and be enriched by other speculative interpretations, and to occasion renewing conversations about how, as educators, we can live more justly with students who appear to us as different in their learning, who appear as others, outside but inside educational discourse. our claim to the need for an alternate “seeing as” regarding this topic may seem more obvious than our claim to the hermeneutic potential of this particular genre. why hard-boiled detective writing? despite the worn cliché of the trench-coated, wise cracking private eye, hard-boiled writing, when it is done right, is powerfully unsettling. it asks uncomfortable questions. it goes to dark places. it has little regard for privilege or authority, particularly when these forms of power are wielded oppressively. hard-boiled detective writing is an ideal tool to agitate and then, ungently, break away the time-thickened sediment of institutional discourse and practice and reveal the often troubling assumptions beneath. we will explain how this genre came to acquire its vigilant character, and elaborate on its value as a form of applied hermeneutics, but first we offer this demonstration of hard-boiled writing applied to our topic of educational classification. samples of the work in progress what follows below are two anecdotes from the lead author’s experiences as a teacher working with slow learners, both told as parts of a hard-boiled detective story. john williamson is a fictionalized version of the author. max hunter is a fictional private detective hired to investigate the symbolic and actual disappearance of slow learners in alberta’s schools. max is characterized as a jaded, detective, someone who does not live easily in the world, a “misfit” in modernity’s program so to speak, much like slow learners in the education system. like them, max appears and disappears at inexplicable times. he does not comport himself in the same way that these students do however, because he does not suffer fools gladly, he cannot abide “departmental regulations,” nor flaccid explanations of “that’s just the way things are done.” he becomes insufferable, in fact dysfunctional, in the face of them. max is not there “to serve and protect” but rather, like dorothy’s dog, in the wizard of oz, there to pull back the curtain (or more in character, perhaps, to tear it to pieces) to reveal the caprice and fakery of the apparatus that propagates the myths and injustices of society. max loves the horror of the effect, revels in pulling people up short with the “awful truth.” max’s investigations lead, as caputo (2007) wrote, williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 6 “not to comfort but to thunderstorms” (p. 214), and he is present as an unwelcome reminder that it is not just nice guys that tell the truth. max does not always believe that the “other might be right,” as does gadamer, nor is he always gadamer’s ideal conversational partner, the friendly interlocutor engaged in the art of strengthening. we cannot listen to max because we like him; he is easily dismissed on that account, as was heidegger for his association with the national socialist party or his infamous das speigel interview. rather we have to listen to max, in spite of his sordid lifestyle, even when he does not respect us, even when he would rather kick our favorite dog than pet him, because he is capable of dragging us, kicking and screaming, to the truth. in this way, he is an important (radical) foil to williamson, bonhomie gadamerian through and through. in both anecdotes, max hunter is the narrator. the first sample demonstrates max’s hard-boiled incredulity in discovering, from primary sources, educational psychology’s categorical depictions of slow learners and learning of the apparent lack of effectiveness in current forms of programming for them in alberta. the next section demonstrates the hermeneutic potential of the fictional detective as means of interrogating williamson’s real unease with the negative assumptions that often haunt slow learners in the educational institutions. the first excerpt from the story begins on a winter’s day in calgary, alberta… ***************************************************************************** the library sitting in the buick, windshield wipers fending off a slow but insistent snowfall, i realized i had no idea where to start. i had to do something though. a paying case is always good but i didn’t want to be stuck in this cold city any longer than i had to and this unnaturally early meeting with williamson had left me with a lot of day to work with. more often than not i like to work by stirring things up instead of piecing things together1, waiting to see what comes to the surface, but i didn’t even really know where to stir. williamson had lent me his public library and university library cards and i had a roughly similar general appearance, aside from being fitter and better dressed, i thought maybe a warm library might be a good place to check up on some of the facts of williamson’s story. i still didn’t entirely trust this strange, earnest client. he seemed, at times a moralizing boy scout, at other times a delusional fool. what kind of man hires a detective to look for an educational category? i drove to the downtown public library, and then away from the library when i saw all the nearby lots were full. i parked at an expensive pay lot making sure i got a receipt so i could pass the pain on to my client and walked several chilly blocks. reaching my destination i passed through a metal detector overseen by an ancient sentry. i’d guessed there might be such security and begrudgingly left candace2 locked and lonely in the trunk of the buick. 1 references and commentary will be made through footnotes in the novel so as not to interrupt the narrative. this note acknowledges that hamilton (1987) makes this point about hard – boiled detectives. 2 max hunter’s affectionate nick-name for his revolver. idea was from spillane (1947).   williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 7 i walked past the checkout desk and some shelves of books and sat myself down in a little patch of heaven, a cubicle with chipped particle board, a hard plastic chair, graffiti and a desktop computer with greasy keys and a smudged screen. i logged myself in as williamson and began to look up subjects. i thought maybe i’d verify what williamson had begun to tell me about slow learners in our first meeting. it was weird; as soon as i’d entered the phrase “slow learner” a couple of times into library catalogue, the computer i was using seemed to slow down for a minute too. despite this i managed to locate a recent book on the topic in their holdings. it was called slow learners: their psychology and instruction3, and a copy was available at this branch. i left my trench coat on the chair to mark my place and walked up the stairs, retrieved the book from one of the shelves and returned to my station. i noticed that while i was upstairs i had acquired a neighbor in cubicle beside me. he didn’t seem particularly sociable or even conscious. a head of matted hair rested, facing away from me, on a huge fleshy forearm. a formless grey overcoat concealed the rest of my companion’s appearance but i could detect the sickly sweet smell of rot. classy joint. the cover of the book i selected depicted child of twelve or thirteen sitting backwards on a chair, maybe to emphasize his perceived backwardness as a slow learner. he was staring out at me with a look that was both forlorn and somewhat vacant. reading the introduction i noticed that the authors authoritatively stated the i.q. levels williamson had only mentioned approximately. i also observed that they seemed to think he had pretty much everything else figured out about slow learners too. the experience of educators confirms that there are many children who are so backward in basic subjects that they need special help. these pupils have limited scope for achievement. they have intelligence quotients between 76 and 89 and they constitute about 18 percent of the total school population. these students do not stand out as very different from their classmates except that they are always a little slow on the uptake and are often teased by the other students because of their slowness. they are quite well built physically but rather clumsy and uncoordinated in movement. they are no trouble in school. although much of the work is difficult for them, they are patient and cooperative…they need help in the form of special class [sic] in ordinary school. most slow learners struggle along in ordinary classes failing to have the special attention which they need.4 “wow,” i thought, “could it be true that almost a fifth of the students in any given school are just like this?” that smelled funny so i checked out another source on the computer, this time an article written by an american psychologist, answering a series of “faqs” or “frequently asked questions” about slow learners on the website “schoolpsychogistfiles.com”.5 3 reddy, ramar, & kusama (2006). 4 reddy, ramar, & kusama (2006). 5 king (2006).   williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 8 a “slow learner” is not a diagnostic category, it is a term people use to describe a student who has the ability to learn necessary academic skills, but at rate and depth below average same age peers. in order to grasp new concepts, a slow learner needs more time, more repetition, and often more resources from teachers to be successful. reasoning skills are typically delayed, which makes new concepts difficult to learn. at this point the website quoted the same iq numbers that williamson and the previous book mentioned. but then the writer made and interesting clarification. those who fall two standard deviations below the mean are often identified as having an intellectual disability (iq below 70). a slow learner does not meet criteria for an intellectual disability (also called mental retardation) [sic]. however, she learns slower than average students and will need additional help to succeed. all this sorting into cozy little boxes was making me miss my tiny warm hotel room, not to mention the greasy buffet table at the hotel restaurant. i was tired and hungry. i noticed my companion in the next cubicle had disappeared; i chided myself for missing this when it happened. still he’d seemed harmless. i gave myself a couple of quick slaps to the face and concentrated on my research again. i was looking for a different perspective on this classification process and found a study in an on-line journal that offered just that.6 this article was pretty technical. still i was able to piece together that these authors didn’t like how psychologists and educators, in the authors’ opinions, often overused the idea of “low average” in describing the traits and needs of students. “low average” described the very same iq range as slow learners were said to have. they said “low average” carries the risk of being a self-fulfilling prophecy for children without the benefit of being a label that leads to additional services. in addition to this, the authors did an interesting experiment. they found one hundred and ninety six archived i.q. tests from a private clinic in an urban centre in alberta and rescored these tests using a different scoring system that was also considered acceptable in the field7. they found that a full eighteen percent of the classifications changed by one category, from low average to average for example. no wonder these slow learners were disappearing. you could make them come and go by how you scored the test. the authors who did the rescoring experiment were pretty critical about the practice of denying struggling students special education services on the basis of their low average iq tests. i wondered why this would even happen. i found an answer to this, though not a very satisfying one, on the previous psychologist’s website. it was in her answer to another f.a.q8. “if these students struggle so much, why do are they often not eligible for special education?” 6 claypool, murusiak, & janzen (2008). 7 the rescoring involved replacing the “symbol search” subtest instead of the “coding” subtest as one of the measures in determining full scale i.q. 8 king (2006). williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 9 special education services are provided for students who have a disability. slow learners typically do not have a disability, even though they need extra support. cognitive abilities are too high for these learners to be considered for an intellectual disability. however, the abilities are usually too low to be considered for a learning disability. i was still suspicious of the claims these sources were making about this group of students, but now something new was bugging me too. if i had it right, it seemed strange to me that in many jurisdictions a special education system had evolved such that it routinely excluded from special services a whole group of learners that the intelligence tests the system seemed to value so highly predicted would struggle at school. “where have the slow learners gone?” indeed. maybe my foolish client was on to something after all. a little thrill of danger ran down my spine. i did know, from my conversation with williamson, a place where some of the slow learners in alberta had gone. it was an instructional tier offered to struggling high school students in some schools. williamson seemed to have mixed feeling about it; then again i didn’t know that that meant either williamson seemed to have mixed feelings about everything. i typed in “knowledge and employability (k & e) classes.” i got several hits. i selected the third item down called “accountability pillar results for annual education results report”9 because i wanted to know who was accountable for these classes. i always wanted to know who was accountable. i was rewarded with a complex document showing various statistics about student achievement and about parent and student perceptions about the general quality of education in the province. “dead end,” i thought. it wasn’t telling me anything about k & e or slow learners. i was about to close the site when i saw the phrase “high school completion rate.” this seemed important, but why? i remembered williamson griping that the students who took this level of classes left school with a credential called the k & e certificate, a credential widely seen as less valuable than the alberta high school diploma. surely if there were even half as many slow learners around as the previous data claimed and they really did have as tough of a time in school as the information about the categories suggested, these k & e classes would be an inevitable path for many of them. the completion results would surely show a significant minority of alberta’s students earning the k & e certificate instead of the high school diploma. i started to look at the stats on this. now that i was in the right section they were easy to find, but not so easy to believe. in 2009, 30,689 students completed high school in three years having earned a high school diploma; 305 completed earning a k & e certificate of achievement. in 2008, 30,500 students completed high school with the diploma, 266 completed with the certificate in the same year. in 2007, 30,105 diplomas, 255 certificates. i rubbed my eyes and looked again, i thought maybe i’d missed a zero. if up to eighteen percent of students were slow learners why were less than one percent of students completing high school with the credential intended for slow learners? “maybe the high school diploma route isn’t so bad for them” i thought, “maybe most of the slow learners manage to scrape through at the higher instructional level.” but what if they didn’t? i looked at the drop our rates for the same five years. for several years running a quarter of the year’s cohort of potential graduates had not completed high school within the three expected years,10 it rose a little to eighty percent when another two years 9 alberta education (2008, 2009, 2010).   10 alberta education (2008, 2009, 2010). williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 10 beyond the expected three were added. i wondered how many of the drop-outs were slow learners? “how do students get lost?” i pondered for a second. i realized one of the main ways was by not completing school. the mystery was coming into focus for me. i felt all tingly; the hairs on the back of my neck were standing at attention. suddenly there was an arm around my throat. so eager had i been to begin my investigation, put this case to bed nice and early, i hadn’t really taken a good look at my foul neighbor at the next computer station. now he was choking me from behind. the full force of the rotting smell hit me with the last breath i was able to take before he cinched my throat shut. as massive, fleshy arms tightened around me i brought my feet up to my desk and pushed backwards with all my strength. the desk thudded against the wall, giving me what i thought was good leverage for dislodging my assailant but he easily absorbed the force and the chokehold just got tighter. my peripheral vision beheld a profile of a part of a pallid face and a bulging eye, black as an eight ball. i wrenched to one side, the hold just got tighter. i looked to the entrance of the library; the old guard was sleeping in his chair. for some reason, my eyes fixed for a second on the computer i was operating. the escape key was missing. someone didn’t appreciate me poking around this category, i realized. my indignation at the story arriving at this point was short-lived as everything went black. later in the story… the entrance exam the sun threw little daggers at me through the gaps in the dirty curtains, interrupting what felt like the first moments of sound sleep i had experienced since awakening from a strange dream. during the night i’d dreamt i was at the dinner table, a shrill voice was telling me “don’t let your meat touch your potatoes, don’t let your potatoes touch your peas” over and over again. i looked down, fork in hand, to try to follow the instructions, make sure my portions were orderly. my plate was filled with hundreds of tiny children, dressed in white, brown and green, skittering across the plate with the unsettling speed of fleeing mice. i rolled over and looked at the clock. it was quarter to eleven. my head hurt, it was still throbbing from the beating i took at the library and the bourbon i took late last night to nurse my wounds. i sat up. i felt sick but not as sick as i ought to, not as sick as i would feel if i had a salaried job11. i tripped over to the window on legs as stiff as stilts. as i looked through the dirty glass with its breathtaking view of a trash bin and narrow industrial road leading out to the ugly main drag, i realized i couldn’t take any more of this on an empty stomach. i spied the adjacent neon sign of a breakfast joint, its glow dulled by the winter daylight. i called williamson and asked if we could meet for breakfast, told him i had some questions. he said his lunch break was at 11:05 so he could meet me then. i made some acrid coffee in the machine provided and changed from the suit i’d slept in to the only other one i’d brought along. i exited the hotel through the main lobby, scraped out a sightline the size of my head on the windshield of the 11 line penned by chandler (1992, p. 44). williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 11 buick, started it up and carefully drove the fifty feet to the restaurant. the cook, the waitress and i made three, a crowd. i sat down and the waitress rambled over with a menu. i ordered black coffee, bacon, toast and a four-egg omelet with extra peppers to kill anything untoward that might be lurking in the grease. i snatched an abandoned section of a newspaper from the table next to me. i read “alberta’s minister of education refers to self as slow learner.”12 apparently while being grilled in the legislature by opposition member, harry chase, about the use of the multiple choice format for provincial standardized exams, hancock, the minister, had referred to himself as a slow learner. i guess he was using some sarcasm of his own to suggest his opponent’s questions were obscure. that was interesting. williamson had said “slow learner” was hidden. in this case, it seemed right out in the open, more available, in fact than other things he might have called himself to make the same point. i’m not the most politically correct guy around but even i realized that, for a variety of reasons, no sensible politician would have chosen to call himself “retarded” even if it was to insult his opponent. williamson showed up looking disheveled already. a lock of his hair was sticking straight up and he’d gotten off track buttoning his shirt. he was off by one and the unsettled fabric stuck out like a fat finger in the middle of his chest. he said he’d been up late again looking for slow learners in his computer. he ordered some sort of fruit cocktail and toast, the cheapest thing on the menu. i asked him the question i’d been wondering about for a while. did any of these slow learners he said had disappeared end up reappearing after high school? instead of answering my question, williamson starting griping, again about the certificate of achievement many of his slow learners end up graduating with instead of the high school diploma, saying how unfair it was that his kids worked so hard but only got a token sort of high school completion credential, one that wouldn’t get them very far after high school. so i challenged him, “so what if some of your k & e students, slow learners… whatever… graduate with a different credential, get credits in different sorts of courses, what’s the big deal? if they can’t handle the normal program isn’t that what should happen? besides, i thought you told me if they did well at this level they could always move back up to the regular program?” i 12 event was actually described on alberta teachers association website (2009) harry chase (lib—calgary-varsity): “because of my inability to interpret educational bafflegab, i have prepared a translation test to help the minister of education qualify and quantify his responses from yesterday, upon which he will be graded, with his results published by the fraser institute. hb pencil ready, mr. minister. multiple-choice tests (a) assume that there’s only one correct response, (b) emphasize the final product over process, (c) are easy and inexpensive to mark, (d) any or all of the above. letter only, please.” minister of education dave hancock: “mr. speaker, being a slow learner, i missed the first part of the question, so i can’t answer the (a), (b), (c), or (d) part.” mr. chase: “grade 12 students don’t have those options. (emphasis added)   williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 12 was already beginning to have my own feelings about this but i wanted to hear what he had to say. williamson looked to be mustering his forces for another of his moralizing salvos, but possibly remembering how i’d reacted last time he tried this, he regrouped and asked a question instead. “you remember how i told you i used to do a lot of work with the high school registered apprenticeship programs13?” i nodded. where was he going with this? “well, one time i was at the apprenticeship and industry training office. i needed some more apprenticeship applications for my students and with the office being so close to my school i found it easier to go there than just asking them to mail them out. there was a kid in front of me in line with his mom, a young man i mean. not a young man like a kid, a young man like eighteen or nineteen.” i loved it when williamson lost control of his labels. he spent so long looking for the right one i was amazed he ever got anything done. he took a breath and continued. “anyhow, i’d overheard as i was waiting behind them that the …son had just graduated from high school, one of the vocational schools where they have k & e, the lower tier only of regular education classes and shop14 classes. during high school he had been indentured as an apprentice mechanic and worked a thousand hours in the trade. he was registering for his first eight weeks of technical, you know, college training, to complete the first year of his apprenticeship. i could hear from the conversation that he started in k & e classes but that he had upgraded during high school and by the time he’d left high school he’d completed the regular high school diploma. his transcript showed he’d enrolled in and passed the right level of math to be automatically accepted, providing that he had been apprenticed, into the college part of his trades training.” “so what was the problem?” i asked, still stymied as to the relevance of any of this. “well the guy at the desk said with k & e courses on his transcript and considering where he went to school he should really write the entrance exam, you know the exam that apprentices who don’t have the pre-requisite courses have to write.” “what? hadn’t he already passed the required math course?” i was confused. 13 a provincial program that enables high school students to begin to earn required hours on the job towards trades certification while also receiving high school course credits for the time they put in alberta learning. alberta learning (2003). 14 alberta’s program of studies gives students the option of more difficult and less difficult classes in all the core areas, english, math, social studies and science. both streams are considered regular education. the lower tier is one level above k & e. alberta education (2013). williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 13 “this was the same question the…apprentice asked. yeah, but the guy at the counter said k & es have a tough time with mechanics training and before wasting a bunch of time and money in the program he should just write the exam to see.” “to see what?” “to see if he could handle the coursework for the program he was enrolling in, i guess.” “so, what happened?” “the apprentice and his mom kept asking if he really had to write the exam of if he could just register. after listening for a while i poked my nose in and, as quietly as i could because i still needed my forms, told the apprentice and his mom that i was sure he had all the prerequisites based on what i’d heard and that they should insist on going ahead and enrolling in the college program, without writing the entrance exam” “did the guy at the counter give in?” “apparently it was getting close to his break time or something and this other worker told the guy she’d take over and processed the application. he kind of shrugged and went on break. after they were done, she handled my request too and when i couldn’t help but comment on the situation that just played out in front of me she told me that her co-worker wasn’t wrong. students from k & e, in their experience, do have a rough time she said.” “is that true?” “it could be. i’ve heard trade school programs are much harder than people think. lots of people probably flunk out. maybe this one would have had trouble too, but he had the prerequisite.” “would you have done more if the guy at the counter dug his heels in?” “i don’t know. i needed the help of the apprenticeship board for a lot of things at the time. i had a lot of students in the apprenticeship program.” the waitress came by to refill our coffee. williamson held out his fruit bowl instead of his cup. he really was a mess. ****************************************************************************** max provides a way to ask an important question: what is the appropriate interpretive response to the procrustean excesses of educational classification these anecdotes describe? the measurement and sorting of students is a serious business, and the rightful critique of the negative consequences and methodological arrogance of these sorting practices can, at times, at least seem to take on a grave character (ervin, n.d.). attempting to have a “serious” conversation about this topic, however, at least if serious is misunderstood as polite, rule-abiding and theoretical, may williamson & field journal of applied hermeneutics 2014 article 4 14 well mean surrendering the hermeneutic vantage point from which the specific, bloody, grotesque truths of educational classification might be revealed. in a strategy that we argue is more effective, disability rights scholars and advocates, particularly those with disabilities, have often taken to playing with disability categorization in satirical artistic representations. phil smith’s (2006) free-verse experimental poem “split-------ting the rock of {speci[es]al} e.ducat.tion: flowers of lang[ue]age in >dis