J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2018, 12(4): 341–350 OM Kolawole et al.: Emergence and Associated … 341 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: December 25, 2018 Original Article Emergence and Associated Risk Factors of Vector Borne West Nile Virus Infection in Ilorin, Nigeria *Olatunji Matthew Kolawole, Glory Adelaiye, Jeremiah Ikhevha Ogah Infectious Diseases and Environmental Health Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria (Received 29 Aug 2016; accepted 5 Aug 2018) Abstract Background: West Nile Virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne viral pathogen that is the causative agent of West Nile fever and encephalitis. Diagnostic tools for WNV infection in Nigeria are not well established hence the current prevalence rate of WNV infection in Nigeria is unknown. We aimed to establish the serological prevalence of WNV infection in febrile patients in Ilorin, Nigeria in 2016, and to assess the risk factors associated with the acquisition of the virus. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving the screening of subjects presenting with febrile illnesses. While specific IgM ELISA was used to determine the seroprevalence, a closed-ended questionnaire was used to as- certain the risk factors associated with this viral infection. Results: Fifteen (7.5%) of the respondents were positive for WNV infection. Subjects living in areas in close prox- imity to trees and bushes (P= 0.011) and stagnant water (P= 0.001) were at a higher risk of having WNV infection. Other risk factors associated with WNV among the respondents include the none use of insecticide (P= 0.001), sitting out at night (P= 0.044), HIV positivity (P= 0.003) and having an organ transplant (P= 0.002). Conclusion: This study clearly shows a considerable WNV infection in Ilorin, with the presence of factors that can promulgate an outbreak, hence a need for further surveillance in the study area. Keywords: Mosquito, Vector-borne, West Nile virus, Nigeria, Prevalence Introduction West Nile virus (WNV) is a neurotropic pathogen which belongs to the Flaviviridae family, and the causative agent of (WNV) fever and encephalitis (1, 2). The virus was first iso- lated in 1937 in Ugandan and named after the West Nile district (3). It was largely limited to Africa and parts of Asia until it was introduced in New York, USA in 1999 (4). Between 1999 and 2010, over 2.5 million people across the world have been infected by this virus, with about 12000 of them developing to enceph- alitis and 1300 deaths (5). Moreover, an out- break of WNV infection was recorded in Greece between 2010 and 2011 which result- ed in about 44 deaths. WNV is a single strand, positive-sense RNA virus with an open reading frame of about 11kb (6). Phylogenetic analysis shows that the virus has two distinct lineages (Lin- eage 1 and 2) although lineages 3, 4 and 5 have also been identified. Outbreaks of WNV in- fection have majorly been associated with lin- eages 1, 2 and 5 (7, 8). While lineage 1 is trans- mitted both in Africa and other parts of the world, lineage 2 is restricted principal to the African continent (9). However, in 2010–2011 WNV outbreak which occurred in Greece line- age 2 was also implicated (3). WNV is a vec- tor-borne virus which infects not just humans but birds and horses. Transmission is mainly via vectors like mosquitoes (Culex spp.) during the course of blood feeding (2). This is usu- ally achieved by the vector’s injection of at least a vasodilator, platelet inhibitor and coag- *Corresponding author: Dr Olatunji Matthew Kolawole, E-mail: omk@unilorin.edu.ng, tomak7475@gmail.com J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2018, 12(4): 341–350 OM Kolawole et al.: Emergence and Associated … 342 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: December 25, 2018 ulation inhibitor in addition to digestive en- zymes (2). Mosquito saliva in vivo plays a crucial role in the transmission of WNV (10). Apart from Culex spp, Aedes mosquitoes are also known to transmit WNV (11, 12). The human skin acts as a natural barrier to differ- ent infections, including WNV although the virus remains in the skin where inoculation occurred for 14 days after infection (13). Majority of the infections associated with WNV in humans are asymptomatic, incubation period of the virus last amid 2 to 15 days (14, 15). Symptomatic cases of WNV fever oc- curs in about 20% of infected persons with flu-like symptoms emerging. Various risk fac- tors have been associated with the develop- ment of WNV infection, they include age, hypertension, compromised immunity, organ transplantation (16–18). Factors which gen- erally encourage contact with the vector re- sponsible for the transmission of WNV usu- ally increase the risk of acquisition of the in- fection. These factors include, proximity to bushes, presence of stagnant water, housing type and weather (19, 20). Although very few studies have shown the prevalence of WNV in Nigeria (21), none have shown its presence in the study area. Moreo- ver, the vectors Culex sp. responsible for the spread of the virus have been very common in the study area (22). We aimed to access the prevalence of WNV infection in Nigeria and to determine factors influencing the spread of the virus and viral infection. Materials and Methods Study design/study site This research was a hospital-based cross- sectional study of febrile malaria patients at- tending hospitals in Ilorin West and South of Kwara state. Patients that presented symptoms similar to malaria and typhoid fever were re- cruited for the study for a period of 6 months from Jan–Jun 5th, 2016. This study was con- ducted in two local government areas (Ilorin West and South) in Kwara State. Ilorin is the state capital of Kwara state in Nigeria and lo- cated on (8o30’N 5o00’ E). The state is made up of about 1.5 million people and has a land mass of 32500km2. Study population/sampling technique The study population consisted of patients that presented with symptoms of malaria and typhoid fever in Sobi specialist hospital and Civil service clinic, Ilorin, Kwara state. Fe- brile patients were screened and a well-struc- tured close-ended questionnaire was admin- istered to them after an informed consent form was dully filled and signed. Participant’s blood was taken as specimen for the necessary clin- ical examination. Inclusion criteria  Febrile patients of all ages.  Patients with hypertension, diabetes, chronic renal failure, and HIV.  Patients who met the criteria and con- sented to partake in the study. Exclusion criteria  Patients vaccinated against or recently infected with related flaviviruses.  Patients that did not give their consent. Blood sample collection Overall, 200 blood samples were collect- ed from febrile patients who met the inclu- sion criteria. Five-millilitre venous blood were collected intravenously using sterile needle sy- ringe from each study participant into a sam- ple bottle marked with a unique number that tallied with the number on their questionnaire. Serum separation was done by centrifugation at 1600 revolutions per minute for five minutes. Serum samples were then collected and stored at -20 °C. Assay The preserved sera were screened for WNV J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2018, 12(4): 341–350 OM Kolawole et al.: Emergence and Associated … 343 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: December 25, 2018 IgM antibodies using ELISA. IgM results were expressed in international unit (IU) with cal- ibration performed against reference stand- ards of 5.0 and 10.0IU/mL where samples with Index values ≤0.10 are negative, ≥1.0 are pos- itive and samples that fell within the 0.11– 0.99 are equivocal. IgM was performed by an indirect ELISA assay. Analysis and inter- pretation of results were done according to the manufacturer’s instruction (WKEA Med Supplies Corp human (WNV) IgM, China: WH-1754). The IgM used for this study has a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 95% for West Nile virus. Statistical analysis All data generated from the study was checked manually for errors in filling respons- es. Descriptive statistics such as mean, fre- quency, standard deviation, percentage, and graph were used in the discussion of the re- sults, in order to give a lucid representation of the data analyzed. The interaction between the prevalence of WNV infection and associ- ated risk factors were tested using χ2 (Chi- Square) test at 5% (P< 0.05) confidence in- terval. All data generated from the study was checked manually for errors in filling responses. Ethical approval The approval for the study was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of the Kwara State Ministry of Health and the in- formed consent was obtained from patients. Results Overall, 200 febrile patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. While ma- jority of respondents (44.0%) were within the age range of 21–30yrs, female subjects ac- counted for a larger portion (60.0%) of the study population. Other socio-demographic characteristics of the study population are also shown in Table 1. Among the 200 respondents that partici- pated, 15 (7.5%) were positive to (WNV) while 184 (92%) were negative with 1 (0.5%) equiv- ocal result. A positive relationship between WNV and the socio-demographic character of the study population is shown in Table 2. Establishing the prevalence of (WNV) in relation to presence of trees and bushes around the habitat of respondents revealed of the 83 (41.5%) with trees 7 (3.5%) were WNV pos- itive. Of 62 cases (31%) with stagnant water, 12 (6%) were WNV positive. Table 3 shows the relationship between WNV prevalence and potential risk factors associated with either the prevalence of the viral infection. Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the Study population Socio-demographic characteristics (n=200) Study population (percentage) Age 11-20 yr 25 (12.5) 21-30 yr 88 (44.0) 31-40 yr 47 (23.5) 41-50 yr 24 (12.0) 61-70 yr 8 (4.0) 71-80 yr 8 (4.0) Gender Male 60 (30.0) Female 140 (70.0) J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2018, 12(4): 341–350 OM Kolawole et al.: Emergence and Associated … 344 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: December 25, 2018 Tribe Yoruba 156 (78.0) Hausa 15 (7.5) Igbo 22 (11.0) Others 7 (3.5) Religion Christians 60 (30.0) Muslims 140 (70.0) Marital status Married 127 (63.5) Single 68 (34.0) Divorced 2 (1.0) Widowed 3 (1.5) Occupation Farmers 7 (3.5) Civil servants 53 (26.5) Traders 61 (30.5) students 50 (25.0) Others 29 (14.5) Level of Education No Education 24 (12.0) Primary Education 25 (12.5) Secondary Education 62 (31.0) Post-secondary Education 89 (44.5) Table 2. Level of Education of the respondents in relation to their WNV status Socio-demographic characteristics Positive (%) Negative (%) χ2 (P) Level of Education 29.63 (0.001) Fisher’s exact No Education 6 (3.0) 18 (10.5) Primary Education 7 (3.5) 18 (10.0) Secondary Education 1 (0.5) 61 (29.0) Post-secondary Education 1 (0.5) 88 (44) P< 0.05 is statistically significant Table 1. Continued … J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2018, 12(4): 341–350 OM Kolawole et al.: Emergence and Associated … 345 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: December 25, 2018 Table 3. Characteristics of West Nile virus Positive Individuals Risk factor Positive (%) Diabetes Yes 0 (0) No 15 (7.5) Hypertension Yes 2 (1.0) No 13 (6.5) HIV Yes 1 (0.5) No 14 (7.5) Organ Yes 1 (0.5) No 14 (7.5) Vaccination Yes 1 (0.5) No 11 (5.5) Not sure 3 (1.5) Blood transfusion Yes 2 (1.0) No 13 (6.5) Surgery Yes 2 (1.0) No 13 (6.5) Presence of Trees and Bushes Yes 7 (3.5) No 8 (4.0) Presence stagnant water Yes 12 (6.0) No 3 (1.5) Use of Mosquito net Yes 7 (3.5) No 8 (4.0) Use of Insecticides Yes 3 (1.5) No 12 (6.0) Traveling frequently Yes 0 (0) No 15 (7.5) Night sit out Yes 14 (7.0) No 1 (0.5) Discussion This study provides data on the serological prevalence of (WNV) among febrile subjects in Ilorin. It also describes some of the socio- demographic attributes of the participating population while establishing the presence or absence of a relationship between known risk factors of West Nile viral infection, the so- cial demographic characteristics of the re- spondents and the prevalence of West Nile virus. Young adults and middle-aged people had the highest rate in this study. This is likely due to the fact that majority of the subjects pre- senting with febrile illnesses at the time of sam- pling were within this age group. Similarly, the female respondents were more than the male ones in a ratio of 2 to 1. This was because women attending antenatal clinics of the hos- pitals surveyed who also had febrile illness participated in the study. This shifted the pop- ulation density in favor of the female subjects. This is similar to results that determined the prevalence of WNV among febrile patients in Sudan (23). Other demographic characteristics such as tribe and religion were largely a reflection of the study area where the study was carried out (24, 25). The most popular housing type among the respondents was single room apart- ments. This is a reflection of the socio-eco- nomic status of the respondents. In Nigeria, most low and medium income earners in Ni- geria lived in single room apartments (26). However, there was no evidence that the hous- ing of the subjects influenced mosquito bite or the prevalence of WNV infection. The ed- ucational level of the subjects varied exten- sively, while less than half of the subjects had tertiary education, 24 (12%) of them had no formal education at all. WNV serological positivity was found among 15 respondents. This represents a 7.5% prevalence rate among the study population. This was lower than the 25% prevalence rate gotten from a similar study in Maiduguri, Ni- geria (21). The difference in these prevalence rates could either be due to the difference in J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2018, 12(4): 341–350 OM Kolawole et al.: Emergence and Associated … 346 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: December 25, 2018 geographical location, prevailing climate at the time of sample collection, or differences in the type of test use. While IgM ELISA was used in this study to ascertain subjects with current or recent WNV infection, Baba et al. used plaque reduction neutralization (21). The high level of specificity of the IgM ELISA used in this study (95%), helps to eliminate largely the risk of cross-reactivity from other flaviviruses especially Dengue virus, which is common in serological test of WNV. Although, this does not entirely rule out the possibilities of cross- reactivity among other flaviviruses, which re- mains one of the pitfalls of using ELISA in testing for WNV. Similar WNV prevalence rate of 9.5% and 13.2% was obtained in Kenya and Sudan (23, 27), respectively. A prevalence rate of 24% in a different part of Kenya (28) and an ex- tremely high rate of 66% was reported (29). The differences in the results from this study and other studies could also be largely influ- enced by environmental conditions (30). The distribution of WNV with respect to age among the respondents was widespread and not limited to a particular age group. Age has not been shown to be a potential risk fac- tor in the acquisition of WNV infection. This is similar to another study (23) with a P-value of 0.811, where age had no role in the sero-de- tection of WNV. This is also in concordance with the reports in Maiduguri, Nigeria (30). Although 11 of the 15 subjects that were positive for WNV were female, this was not statistically significant (P= 0.765) as more fe- males participated in the study than males. In addition, gender is not a known risk factor necessary for the acquisition of WNV. This is also buttressed (27) which showed that gen- der did not constitute a potential risk factor for WNV acquisition among Kenyan adults. However, this is not in agreement with ano- tehr study (21) which noticed differences be- tween the frequencies of positive diagnoses in males and females for WNV (P= 0.022, by Fisher’s exact test). The educational level of the respondents showed that the prevalence of WNV reduced as their educational level increases as 13 of the 15 subjects with WNV infection had ei- ther primary education or no formal educa- tion at all. Increased level of education in- creases the probability of the respondents having knowledge of methods of preventing WNV infection. A statistical relationship ex- isted between the educational level of the re- spondents and prevalence of WNV infection. The Centre for Disease Control (31) empha- sizes the need for education (formal/ infor- mal) of the populace about WNV in order to reduce the burden of WNV Infection. Moreover, the housing type of the re- spondents did not contribute statistically (P= 0.719) to the prevalence of WNV infection. Although housing type measured by roofing type could contribute to the prevalence of mosquitoes which are the vectors for WNV. The housing type did not statistically influ- ence the prevalence of arboviruses including WNV among the respondents (27). In Chi- cago (32), living in older houses increased the risk of acquiring WNV infection among the studied population Presence of trees and bushes influenced the prevalence of WNV among the respond- ents. Presence of trees and bushes provides habitat for mosquitoes known vectors of WNV. Environmental conditions that increase the prevalence of mosquitoes and birds increase the risk of WNV infection (33). Similarly, stagnant water is a known fac- tor which encourages the increase in population of mosquitoes which invariably increases the risk of WNV infection (33). WNV case-pa- tients were significantly more likely to reside near slow-moving/stagnant water sources with heavier vegetation (20). Results from this study are similar to reports from El Paso, Texas, where WNV case-patients resided close to yards that were flooded regularly by irrigation canals (19). In Romania, the risk for WNV infection was higher among persons with J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2018, 12(4): 341–350 OM Kolawole et al.: Emergence and Associated … 347 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: December 25, 2018 mosquitoes in their homes and with flooded basements (34). Although factors that help to reduce in- cidence of mosquitoes invariably helps to re- duce the burden of WNV infection, the use of mosquito nets did not contribute to the prevalence of WNV among the respondents. This might be due to improper use of these mosquito nets. Various studies in Nigeria have reported various misuse of insecticide-treat- ed nets (35). However, the use of insecticide among the respondents played a major role in the acqui- sition of WNV. Preventing WNV is strongly linked to preventing mosquito bite (33) and this can be achieved through the use of in- secticide. Adulticiding (36) which involves killing of the adult mosquitoes using insecti- cides and larviciding (36) which involves the use of insecticide has been shown to be ef- fective in controlling the spread of mosquitoes which are the main vectors of WNV (33). Risk for becoming infected can be influ- enced by time spent outdoors and decisions on whether to adopt personal precautions against mosquito bites (33), this was reflec- tive of the results obtained in this study. In Houston, a serosurvey of homeless individu- als found that time spent outdoors greatly influenced infectivity, with 12.5% of those who reported spending >12h outdoors being positive for WNV, compared to only 2% of those who reported spending ≤6h outdoors (37). In this study majority of the subjects with (WNV) infection spent considerable time out- doors. Although diabetes and hypertension did not constitute factors influencing the acquisi- tion of WNV in this study, factors that reduce the overall immunity of humans will help prop- agate the development of WNV infection. Moreover, hypertension and diabetes have been shown to be independent risk factors in the development of encephalitis from WNV in- fection (17). In New York City, age of ≥75 yr and diabetes mellitus were both shown to be independent risk factors for death from WNV infection (38). Although only one of the subjects had HIV, this subject was also positive for WNV. A sta- tistical association (P= 0.003) exists between the HIV status of the respondents and the prev- alence of WNV. HIV infection is known to cause reduced immunity in individuals hav- ing the disease, thus such persons are at a high- er risk of having WNV infection (39) and are regarded as a major risk factor in the devel- opment of WNV infection (9). In this study, only one of the respondents has had an organ transplant, with this same respondent being positive for WNV infection. Although a sig- nificant value was obtained from this factor, much cannot be deduced due to the very low population of subjects with organ transplant and HIV in this study. Organ transplant is a major cause of reduced immunity, which could increase the risk of developing WNV (16). Conclusion The risk factors which could promulgate an outbreak of WNV infection in the study area are quite evident. The presence of WNV in- fection in febrile patients also show a need to establish reliable protocols for the detection of the virus in subjects to avoid wrong diag- nosis, as presently, such patients with febrile illnesses are not screened for WNV. Envi- ronmental and behavioral factors which pro- mote the spread of the virus should also be curbed. Acknowledgements No financial support was received for this study. The authors declare that there is no con- flict of interests. References 1. Sule MS, Oluwayelu DO (2016) Analysis J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2018, 12(4): 341–350 OM Kolawole et al.: Emergence and Associated … 348 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: December 25, 2018 of Culex and Aedes mosquitoes in south- western Nigeria revealed no West Nile virus activity. Pan Afr Med J. 23: 116. 2. Colpitts TM, Conway MJ, Montgomery RR, Fikrig E (2012) West Nile Virus: Bi- ology, Transmission, and Human Infec- tion. Clin Microbiol. 25(4): 635–648. 3. Valiakos G, Athanasiou LV, Touloudi A, Papatsiros V, Spyrou V, Petrovska L, Bil- linis C (2013) West Nile Virus: Basic Principles, ReplicationMechanism, Im- mune Response andImportant Genetic De- terminants of Virulence. In: Immunology and Microbiology "Viral Replication", book edited by German Rosas-Acosta, 51-1055-2. 4. Lanciotti RS, Roehrig JT, Deubel V, Smith J, Parker M, Steele K, Crise B, Volpe KE (1999) Origin of the West Nile Virus Re- sponsible for an Outbreak of Encephali- tis in the Northeastern United States. Sci- ence. 286(5448): 2333–2337. 5. Kilpatrick AM (2011) Globalization, land use, and the invasion of West Nile virus. Science. 334: 323–327. 6. Friebe P, Harris E (2010) Interplay of RNA elements in the dengue virus 5= and 3= ends required for viral RNA replication. J Virol. 84: 6103–6118. 7. May FJ, Davis CT, Tesh RB, Barrett ADT (2011) Phylogeography of West Nile vi- rus: from the cradle of evolution in Afri- ca to Eurasia, Australia, and the Ameri- cas. J Virol. 85(6): 2964–2974. 8. Bondre VP, Jadi RS, Mishra AC, Yergol- kar PN, Arankalle VA (2007) West Nile virus isolates from India: evidence for a distinct genetic lineage. J Gen Virol. 88 (3): 875–884. 9. Pattan SR, Dighe NS, Bhawar SB, Gaware VM, Hole MB, Musmade DS, Bhosale MS (2009) West Nile Fever: An Over- view. J Biomed Sci Res. 1(1): 33–48. 10. Styer LM, Lim PY, Louie KL, Albright RG, Kramer LD, Bernard KA (2011) Mosquito saliva causes enhancement of West Nile virus infection in mice. J Vi- rol. 85: 1517–1527. 11. Centre for Food Security and Public health (CFSPH) (2009) West Nile Virus Infection. Available at: www.cfsph.iastate.edu/IICAB/. 12. Ciota AT, Kramer LD (2013) Vector- Virus Interactions and Transmission Dy- namics of West Nile Virus. Viruses. 5 (12): 3021–3047. 13. Appler KK, Brown AN, Stewart BS, Behr MJ, Demarest VL, Wong SJ, Bernard KA (2010) Persistence of West Nile vi- rus in the central nervous system and periphery of mice. PLoS One. 5: 10649. 14. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “West Nile Virus: what you need to know” 2012, fact sheet.www.cdc.gov 15. Watson JT, Pertel PE, Jones RC, Siston AM, Paul WS, Austin CC, Gerber SI (2004) Clinical characteristics and func- tional outcomes of West Nile fever. Ann Intern Med. 141: 360–365. 16. Campbell GL, Marfin AA, Lanciotti RS, Gubler DJ (2002) West Nile virus. Lan- cet Infect Dis. 2: 519–529. 17. Murray K, Baraniuk S, Resnick M, Ara- fat R, Kilborn C, Cain K, Shallenberger R, York TL, Martinez D, Hellums JS, Hellums D, Malkoff M, Elgawley N, Mcneely W, Khuwaja SA, Tesh RB (2006) Risk factors for encephalitis and death from West Nile virus infection. Epidemiol Infect. 134(6): 1325–1332. 18. Jean CM, Honarmand S, Louie JK, Gla- ser CA (2007) Risk factors for West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease, Cali- fornia, 2005. Emerg Infect Dis. 13(12): 1918–1920. 19. Cardenas VM, Jaime J, Ford PB, Gonza- lez FJ, Carrillo I, Gallegos JE, Watts DM (2011) Yard flooding by irrigation ca- nals increased the risk of West Nile dis- ease in El Paso, Texas. Ann Epidemiol. 21: 922–929. 20. Nolan MS, Zangeneh A, Khuwaja SA, http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/IICAB/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=SHALLENBERGER%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16672108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=YORK%20T%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16672108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=MARTINEZ%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16672108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=HELLUMS%20J%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16672108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=HELLUMS%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16672108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=HELLUMS%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16672108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=MALKOFF%20M%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16672108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=ELGAWLEY%20N%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16672108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=McNEELY%20W%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16672108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=KHUWAJA%20S%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16672108 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=TESH%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16672108 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2018, 12(4): 341–350 OM Kolawole et al.: Emergence and Associated … 349 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: December 25, 2018 Martinez D, Rossmann SN, Cardenas V, Murray KO (2012) Proximity of resi- dence to bodies of water and risk for west nilevirus infection: a case-control study in Houston, Texas. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012: 159578. 21. Baba MM, Logue CH, Oderinde B, Ab- dulmaleek H, Williams J, Lewis J, Laws TR, Hewson R, Marcello A, D'Agaro P (2013) Evidence of arbovirus coinfec- tion in suspected febrile malaria and ty- phoid patients in Nigeria. J Infect Dev Ctries 7(1): 051–059. 22. Motayo BO, Onoja BA, Faneye AO, Ad- eniji JA (2016) Seasonal abundance and molecular identification of West Nile vi- rus vectors, Culex pipens and Culex quin- quefasciatus (diptera: culicidae) in Abe- okuta, South-West, Nigeria. Afri Health Sci. 16(1): 135–140. 23. Ahmed SBY, Hamedelnil YF (2015) Serodetection of West Nile Virus among febrile non malarial patients at Wad Mad- eni Teaching Hospital. Intern J Adv Sci Tech Res. 5(3): 307–341. 24. Olawepo RA, Okedare EA (2006) Men’s Attitudes Towards Family Planning in a Traditional Urban Centre: An Example from Ilorin, Nigeria. J Social Sci. 13(2): 83–90. 25. Kolawole OM, Idakwo AI, Ige O, Owu- da J, Anibijuwon I (2015) Prevalence of Hospital Acquired Infections in the In- tensive Care Unit of University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin Nigeria. Su- dan J Med Sci. 10(2): 59–66. 26. Aluko O (2012) Impact of poverty on housing condition in Nigeria: A case study of Mushin Local Government Ar- ea of Lagos State. J Afr Stud Dev. 4(3): 81–89. 27. Mease LE, Coldren RL, Musila LA, Prosser T, Ogolla F, Ofula VO, Schoepp RJ, Rossi CA, Adungo N (2011) Sero- prevalence and distribution of arboviral infections among rural Kenyan adults: A cross-sectional study. Virol J. 8: 371. 28. Sutherland LJ, Cash AA, Huang YS, Sang RC, Malhotra I, Moormann AM, King CL, Weaver SC, King CH, LaBeaud AD (2011) Serologic Evidence of Arboviral Infections among Humans in Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 85(1): 158–161. 29. Nur YA, Groen J, Heuvelmans H, Tuyn- man W, Copra C (1999) An outbreak of West Nile fever among migrants in Kis- angani, Democratic Republic of Congo. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 61: 885–888. 30. Baba MM, Saron M, Adeniji JA (2006) The seasonal effect of West Nile Virus in semi-arid zone, Nigeria. Acad J. 1: 31–38. 31. Centers for Disease Control and Pre- vention CDC. West Nile Virus (WNV) Fact Sheet 2015, Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/westnile/resources/ pdfs/wnvfactsheet_508.pdf 32. Ruiz MO, Tedesco C, McTighe TJ, Aus- tin C, Kitron U (2004) Environmental and social determinants of human risk during a West Nile virus outbreak in the greater Chicago area, 2002. Intern J Health Geography. 3: 8. 33. Montgomery RR, Murray KO (2015) Risk factors for West Nile virus Infec- tion and Disease in Populations and In- dividuals. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 13(3): 317–325. 34. Han LL, Popovici F, Alexander Jr JP, Laurentia V, Tengelsen LA, Cernescu C (1996) Risk factors for West Nile virus infection and meningoencephalitis, Ro- mania. J Infect Dis. 179: 230–233. 35. Ordinioha B (2012) The use and misuse of mass distributed free insecticide- treated bed nets in a semi-urban com- munity in Rivers State, Nigeria. Ann Afri Med. 11: 163–168. 36. Rose RI (2001) Pesticides and public health: integrated methods of mosquito management. Emerg Infect Dis. 7: 17– 23. http://www.cdc.gov/westnile/resources/pdfs/wnvfactsheet_508.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/westnile/resources/pdfs/wnvfactsheet_508.pdf J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2018, 12(4): 341–350 OM Kolawole et al.: Emergence and Associated … 350 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: December 25, 2018 37. Meyer TE, Bull LM, Cain, HK, Pascua RF, Travassos da RA, Gutierrez CR (2007) West Nile virus infection among the homeless, Houston, Texas. Emerg Infect Dis. 13: 1500–1503. 38. Nash D, Mostashari F, Fine A, Miller J, O'Leary D, Murray K, Huang A, Ros- enberg A, Greenberg A, Sherman M, Wong S, Layton M (2001) The outbreak of West Nile virus infection in the New York City area in 1999. N Engl J Med. 344: 1807–1814. 39. Gray TJ, Webb CE (2014) A review of the epidemiological and clinical aspects of West Nile virus. Int J Gen Med. 7: 193–203.