J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2015, 9(2): 137–147 Z Telmadarraiy et al.: Vectors of Crimean … 137 Review Article Vectors of Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus in Iran *Zakkyeh Telmadarraiy 1, Sadegh Chinikar 2, Hassan Vatandoost 1,3, Faezeh Faghihi 4, Asadollah Hosseini-Chegeni 5 1Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2Arboviruses and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers Laboratory (National Reference Laboratory), Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran 3Institue for Environmental Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 4Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 5Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran (Received 17 Feb 2014; accepted 6 Dec 2014) Abstract Background: Ticks are important vectors and reservoirs of Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) virus. Hu- man beings may be infected whenever the normal life cycle of the infected ticks on non- human vertebrate hosts is interrupted by the undesirable presence of humans in the cycle. A total of 26 species of Argasid and Ixodid ticks have been recorded in Iran; including nine Hyalomma, two Rhipicephalus, two Dermacentor, five Haemaphysalis, two Boophilus, one Ixodes and two Argas as well as three Ornithodoros species as blood sucking ectoparasites of livestock and poultries. The present paper reviews tick vectors of CCHF virus in Iran, focusing on the role of ticks in different provinces of Iran using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Methods: During ten years study, 1054 tick specimens; including two species of Argasidae and 17 species of Ixodidae were examined for their infection to CCHF virus genome. The output of all studies as well as related publi- cations were discussed in the current paper. Results: The results show that Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Hyalomma marginatum, H. anatolicum, H. asiaticum and H. dromedarii were known as the most frequent species which were positive for CCHF virus. Conclusion: The status of ticks which were positive for CCHF virus revealed that unlike the most common idea that Hyalomma species are the most important vectors of CCHF virus, other ticks including Rhipicephalus, Haemaphysalis and Dermacentor can be reservoir of this virus; thus, considering geographical distribution, type of host and environmental conditions, different tick control measurements should be carried out in areas with high inci- dence of CCHF disease. Keywords: Vector tick, Domestic animals, CCHF, Iran, RT-PCR A historical perspective of CCHF disease in Iran The name CCHF derives from two regions in Asia and Africa where an often fatal human hemorrhagic fever disease occurred for the first time in the 1940s and 1950s (Nuttall 2001). Interestingly, a hemorrhagic disease similar to CCHF was reported by Dzhurzhoni, an Iranian physician, in 1110 A.D. (Hoogstraal 1979). The CCHFV is the type species of the genus Nairovirus, family Bunyaviridae. The disease is known with the local name “Kara- Mikh typhoid fever” in northwest of Iran (Chinikar 2007). Following publication of some reports about the occurrence of a hemorrhagic disease in human and domestic animals and confirming the presence of viral agent in col- lected ticks from Iran (Achrafi and Noriyan 1966, Chumakov et al. 1970, Asefi 1974, Saidi et al. 1975, Sureau et al. 1980, Ardoin and Karimi 1982), the disease are considered as a public health problem by Iranian health system *Corresponding author: Dr Zakkyeh Telmadarraiy, E-mail: ztelma@yahoo.co.in http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 11, 2015 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2015, 9(2): 137–147 Z Telmadarraiy et al.: Vectors of Crimean … 138 in 1999 (Labbaf-Ghasemi 2006, Chinikar 2007). The virus have been detected frequently in livestock (such as sheep, cow, goat and camel), human and tick vectors in many parts of Iran (Saidi et al. 1975, Moradi et al. 2008, Telmadarraiy et al. 2008a, Telmadarraiy et al. 2008b, Telmadarraiy et al. 2009, Chinikar et al. 2012, Mehravaran et al. 2013, Champour et al. 2014). So far, the disease has been re- ported from 23 out of 31 provinces of Iran that mostly centralized in southeast, due to a long border with two high risk countries, Afghanistan and Pakistan (Chinikar et al. 2010). Since 2000, the most CCHF positive cases have been reported from Sistan-o Baluchistan Province of Iran (Chinikar et al. 2010, Keshtkar-Jahromi et al. 2013). Tick vectors Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) are the important vectors/reservoirs of Crimean Congo Hem- orrhagic Fever virus (CCHFV). They play an important role in the survival of the virus in nature (Watts et al. 1988). The parasitic be- havior of ticks during their all life stages, excessive blood feeding on hosts, wide range of vertebrate hosts, great reproductive po- tential, long term survival and adaptability to harsh and variable ecological conditions are among considerable characteristics of ticks as potential vectors of a large number of mi- crobial agents (Linthicum and Bailey 1994). Humans may be infected via a tick bite when- ever a normal cycle of virus-tick-nonhuman vertebrates is interrupted by the undesirable presence of human (such as herdsmen, tour- ists, veterinarian researchers) in the nature cy- cle. Domestic animals are known to be sus- ceptible to CCHF virus; however, there is no evidence that any symptomatic disease de- velop (Eldridge et al. 2004). The disease oc- cur in Palearctic, Oriental and some parts of sub-Saharan Africa wherever one or several Hyalomma to be distributed as widespread tick species (Linthicum and Bailey 1994). A range of disease from mild to severe clinical illness occurs in human. In severe cases, petechial rash on the trunk and limbs, besides the appearance of hemorrhage from the body cavities are among the common clinical symptoms of the disease (Nuttall 2001). The approximate mortality rate of 22 % has been reported in CCHF cases infected by a tick bite, though the rate is variable in dif- ferent areas (Hoogstraal 1979). The virus has been reported in two groups of ticks. The first group includes aggressive species, which search for human actively. For Instance, spe- cies such as Hyalomma marginatum and H. anatolicum are the main vectors in this group when epidemics is occurring (Hoogstraal 1979). Second group are less aggressive spe- cies seeking humans normally. For instance the genera Rhipicephalus, Boophilus, Haemaphysalis, Amblyomma, Dermacentor and even other Hyalomma are among species that chiefly maintain enzootic foci of CCHF virus among tick vectors and wild/domestic mammals (Hoogstraal 1979). Approximately, 26 soft (Argasidae) and hard (Ixodidae) tick species have been rec- orded from Iran so far. They include nine Hyalomma, two Rhipicephalus, two Derma- centor, five Haemaphysalis, two Boophilus, one Ixodes, two Argas and three Ornithodoros species as ectoparasites of livestock and poul- tries (Maghami 1968, Mazlum 1971, Rahbari et al. 2007). Studies on tick vectors of CCHFV in Iran have begun since 1980s, when Sureau et al. (1980) detected the virus in nymphs of Ornithodoros lahorensis collected from goat, however, the antibody of CCHFV (CCHF virus) was detected in the serum of the sheep sent from Iran to Russia, for the first time (Chumakov et al. 1970). Few years later, Saidi et al. (1975) reported the presence of CCHFV antibody in the sera of man, sheep, goats, cattle and some small mammals in Iran. Iran has different climatic conditions and appropriate landscapes suitable for the occur- rence of many species of bloodsucking ticks http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 11, 2015 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2015, 9(2): 137–147 Z Telmadarraiy et al.: Vectors of Crimean … 139 (up to the present 50 species) as external par- asites on mammals, birds and other animals (Kamali et al. 2001). The circulation of CCHF virus in ticks and livestock plays an im- portant role in the maintenance of virus in Iran (Chinikar et al. 2010). Considering to the importance of ticks in the survival of the virus, a series of studies have been conduct- ed by our group on ticks suspected to trans- mit the CCHFV between domestic animals and human. The present paper reviews the tick vec- tors of CCHFV in Iran and summarizes the results of ten years study conducted in 14 provinces of Iran. Similar studies associated with tick vectors of CCHFV have also been discussed in the present study. Argasidae The Argasid or soft ticks are the most common ectoparasites found on the poultries and domestic animals in Iran (Rafyi and Maghami 1965). To date, five human asso- ciated soft ticks are known in Iran, all of them play important role in transmission of arthropod borne diseases (Djanbakhsh 1956, Rafyi and Rak 1985, Barmaki et al. 2010, Oshaghi et al. 2011, Rafinejad et al. 2011). Argas Two Argas species are widely found in Iran namely A. persicus, a parasite of poultries, and A. reflexus, a parasite of pigeon and doves. Recently, a third species is also found on Pipistrellus pipistrellus which can parasitize bats (Hosseini-Chegeni and Tavakoli 2013). Ornithodoros Five Ornithodoros species have been rec- orded in Iran, including O. erraticus and O. tartakovskyi (parasites of rodents), O. laho- rensis and O. canestrinii (parasites of livestock) and O. tholozani (parasites of mammals, birds and even human) (Djanbakhsh 1956, Rafyi and Maghami 1965, Rafyi and Rak 1985). Ixodidae Totally, 21 Ixodid or hard tick species have been reported in Iran. All of the species parasitize domestic animals, including sheep, goat, cattle, camel, horse, and donkey, more- over, humans might be infested accidentally (Chinikar 2007). Dermacentor The genus Dermacentor is a most attrac- tive tick having an ornate scutal pattern. The polymorphic D. marginatus and D. niveus (= D. daghestanicus) are two well-known spe- cies in Iran (Rahbari et al. 2007) as well as a Less known species D. raskemensis; how- ever, their species status need to be revised. Haemaphysalis Six species of Haemaphysalis includes H. concinna, H. erinacei, H. inermis, H. parva, H. punctata and H. sulcata were found in Iran. The latter species (H. sulcata) is the most widespread species in Iran (Rahbari et al. 2007, Hosseini-Chegeni et al. 2014). Hyalomma The genus of Hyalomma is the most im- portant tick species associates with livestock. The most frequent species of this genus found in Iran are as follows: H. anatolicum, H. asiaticum, H. detritum, H. dromedarii, H. excavatum, H. marginatum, H. rufipes and H. schulzei (Hosseini-Chegeni et al. 2013). Ixodes The species I. ricinus belonging to Ixodes genus has been reported on livestock in Iran. The prevalence of this species is confined to Hyrcanian zone in north part of Iran. This multi-host species parasitize over three hun- dred different hosts; including domestic and wild animals (Sonenshine et al. 2002). Two other species of Ixodes genus have been re- ported on wild animals (Filippova et al. 1976). Rhipicephalus R. sanguineus is the most common species http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 11, 2015 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2015, 9(2): 137–147 Z Telmadarraiy et al.: Vectors of Crimean … 140 of the genus Rhipicephalus throughout Iran. As well as a rare species, R. bursa, it may also be found on domestic and wild an- imals in Iran (Rahbari et al. 2007). Vectors of CCHFV in Iran, Past to Present Since 2004, we examined different tick species of two families Argasidae (two gen- era, two species) and Ixodidae (five genera, 17 species) for detection of CCHF virus ge- nome. The infection rate of tick species that were positive for CCHF virus has been shown in the Table 1. The collection sites of tick in different geographical zones of Iran have also been shown in Fig. 1. Our results showed that Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Hyalomma marginatum, H. anatolicum, H. asiaticum and H. dromedarii were the most frequent tick species which were positive for CCHFV whereas other species were less in- fected (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). Based on the results obtained from re- verse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Argasid ticks, including Argas persicus, Ixodid ticks, Boophilus annulatus, Haemaphysalis sulcata, Ha. concina, and Ha. erinacei as well as Rhipicephalus turanicus were negative for CCHF virus. After Dengue virus, CCHFV is the second most widespread arboviruse type disease throughout the world (Appannanavar and Mishra 2011). The biological role of ticks is also important, not only as virus vectors, but also as reservoirs of the virus in nature (Whitehouse 2004). The long term survival of the virus occurs in live dormant ticks at unfavorable climatic conditions (Chumakov 1965). Hoogstraal (1979) reviewed the epi- demiology of tick borne Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever virus. He introduced the trans-stadial and trans-ovarial (vertical) trans- mission of the virus in ticks (Hoogstraal 1979). Another route that CCHF virus could be transmitted among tick vector is an interesting mechanism called co-feeding behavior in which virus transferred between feeding ticks on the host (Gordon et al. 1993). Except tick bite, the other route for transmissions of virus to human being is the direct contact with blood or tissue of the in- fected livestock and nosocomial infection. The biting of the infected tick or contact of human to the infected tick hemolymph through naked hands or other parts of the body and also other tick borne transmission routes are considered non-significant in the epidemiol- ogy of CCHF virus in Iran (Shirzadi 2003). Based on Chinikar et al. (2007) the direct in- fection of humans by tick bite is rare in Iran and has been observed only in few cases (Chinikar 2007). CCHFV propagates in tick vectors and within the natural host vertebrate including domestic animals. From biological point of view, the virus is transmitted from tick to the host via tick saliva during blood feeding. The virus is transmitted from tick to tick through co-feeding phenomenon (Nuttall 2001). Thus, in Iran, the essential role of ticks in the epidemiology of CCHF virus may be debatable and never considered merely according to patient’s statements and health worker reports (Izadi et al. 2003). Ornithodoros lahorensis was reported as the most frequent soft tick infected to CCHFV in northwest (Ardebil and Azerbai- jan-e Sharqi) northeast and central parts of Iran (Sureau et al. 1980, Shirani et al. 2004). Shirani et al. could detect the virus in the body of living Ornithodoros lahorensis maintained in the laboratory conditions for three months. The authors also concluded that Argasid ticks might be considered as a potential reservoir of CCHFV (Shirani et al. 2004). However, the few other studies showed that Argasid ticks cannot be infected in the laboratory condi- tion (Linthicum and Bailey 1994, Shirani et al. 2004). Three Argas ticks reported from Iran including A. persicus, A. vespertilionis and A. refelexus, all have been considered as the main vectors of animal diseases (Hosseini- http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 11, 2015 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2015, 9(2): 137–147 Z Telmadarraiy et al.: Vectors of Crimean … 141 Chegeni and Tavakoli 2013). The infection of the latter species to CCHFV was confimed in Hamedan Province, Iran (Tahmasebi et al. 2010). An expected reason of the minor im- plication of soft ticks in the transmission of CCHFV is their quick feeding behavior (ex- cluding some exceptions e g, larvae of O. lahorensis, O. canestrinii and Argas persicus) (Hoogstraal 1985). In many literatures Hyalomma ticks were introduced as the main vectors of CCHFV thus the correct identi- fication of species is an essential work since it may be a complicated and controversial issue in Iran (Hosseini et al. 2011, Hosseini and Tavakoli 2012, Tavakoli et al. 2012). In spite of the only report on low infection rate of Hyalomma detritum (Salim-Abadi et al. 2011), Tahmasebi et al. (2010) reported 48 positive ticks out of 294 of H. detritum tested for CCHFV which is somewhat doubtful (Tahmasebi et al. 2010). The other less frequent and patchy distributed tick is Rhipicephalus bursa that is the most frequent tick infected to CCHFV in Fereydoonshahr of Isfahan Province (Chinikar et al. 2012) and north- west of Iran (Telmadarraiy et al. 2009). Many literatures, refer Hyalomma tick as main vector of CCHFV in nature; however, in our study wherever Hyalomma was absent or not considered as the predominant vector (in Ghaemshahr County, Mazandaran Prov- ince), CCHFV was detected from other ticks such as Rhipicephalus and Haemaphysalis. It seems that these species are key species in the survival of the virus in the absence of Hyalomma. On the other hand, sometimes the infection rate of Hyalomma to CCHFV was in low level in comparison with Rhipicephalus (i.e, totally 5 positive out of 8 Rhipicephalus versus only a few positive Hyalomma out of 97 specimens in Ghaen county, Khorasan-e Joonobi Province). There are little information on genetic structure and molecular phylogenetic analysis on CCHF viruses isolated from different tick vectors in Iran. However, the phylogeny stud- ies on the Iranian CCHFV isolates in compar- ison with a representative set of CCHFV se- quences from other regions of the world based on S-segment sequences revealed that the Iranian isolates are mostly related to Asian 1 group particularly to the Pakistani strains (Chinikar et al. 2012) although a few isolates were associated with Iraq (Chinikar et al. 2012) or Europe 1 strains (Morovvati et al. 2014). Further molecular epidemiology studies are necessary to find out the origin and the phylogenetic relationship of Iranian CCHFV to improve the surveillance and control meas- urements of the disease in the country. Fig. 1. The seven geographical zones of Iran; numbers 1–14 represented different localities of tick collection, 1. Ardabil, 2. Azarbayjan-e Sharqi, 3. Golestan, 4. Hamadan, 5. Ilam (Abdanan township), 6. Khorasan-e Joonobi, 7. Khorasan-e Razavi, 8. Khorasan-e Shomali, 9. Mazandaran (Pushtekooh district), 10. Mazandaran (Ghaemshahr County), 11. Qom, 12. Sistan-o- Baluchistan, 13. Tehran, 14. Yazd http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 11, 2015 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2015, 9(2): 137–147 Z Telmadarraiy et al.: Vectors of Crimean … 142 Table 1. Infection rates (%) of Iranian Tick Species with CCHF Virus in Different Localities of Iran Tick species R . s an gu in eu s R . b u rs a O . l ah or en si s H a. p u n ct at a H a. i n er m is H .s p H . s ch u lz ei H . m ar gi n at u m H . d ro m ed ar ii H . d et ri tu m H . a si at ic u m H . a n at ol ic u m D . m ar gi n at u sT/PProvince● 13.86.94.60.80.8----130/35Ardebil* -11-5.43.7-756/15Azarbayjan-e Sharqi** 0.7-0.71.6--2.3130/7Golestan 2.31.2-1.23.42.3-1.288/10Hamadan*** 1.35-1.351.3574/3Ilam 0.90.9--0.9--1.81.8-115/7Khorasan-e Joonobi 3-4.5-67/5Khorasan-e Shomali 1.758/1MazandaranI 2.42.42.42.4--42/4MazandaranII -7.1--14/1Qom -8.3---140/6Sistan-o Baluchistan**** 2----2,E-50/2Tehran -0.72.11.40.70.7-140/8Yazd***** 3 8 1 8 .3 1 7 .9 3 .6 1 0 .7 1 7 .1 0 .8 1 4 .9 5 2 3 .9 1 .4 9 .5 5 1 1 .8 5 71 1 1 2 /1 0 8 Total References related to other studies including papers authored/co-authored by senior author (ZT) including; *: Telmadarraiy et al. 2009 **: Telmadarraiy et al. 2008a ***: Moradi et al. 2008; Telmadarraiy et al. 2008a ****: Mehravaran et al. 2013 *****: Salim-Abadi et al. 2011 D: Dermacentor, Ha. Haemaphysalis, H: Hyalomma, R: Rhipicephalus, O: Ornithodoros ●: Numbers arranged according to collection sites in the map (Fig. 2) T/P: total tested/positive tick specimen, I. Pushtekooh district, II. Ghaemshahr county, E: egg mass, Blank places: not done, -: negative Fig. 2. The male of most frequent Iranian Ixodid ticks infected to CCHFV, I) Rhipicephalus sanguineus, II) Hyalomma marginatum, III) Hyalomma anatolicum, IV) Hyalomma asiaticum, V–VI) Hyalomma dromedarii dorsal and ventral view respectively. (Black and white arrows indicated the most taxonomic characters of cer- tain species) Fig. 3. The male of less frequent Iranian Ixodid and Argasid ticks infected to CCHFV, I) Hyalomma schulzei, II) Hyalomma detritum, III) Dermacentor marginatus, IV) Rhipicephalus bursa, V–VI) Haemaphysalis sulcata ventral and dorsal view respectively, VII–VIII) Ornithodoros lahorensis dorsal and ventral view. (Black and white arrows indicated the most taxonomic characters of cer- tain species) http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 11, 2015 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2015, 9(2): 137–147 Z Telmadarraiy et al.: Vectors of Crimean … 143 Control of ticks Based on CCHF vector, different control measurements should be performed in high risk areas where disease presents (Hoogstraal 1979). For instance, in Ghaemshahr County of Mazandaran Province, and Azarbayjan-e Gharbi Province, Haemaphysalis punctata and Ha. inermis are the most prevalent species. In Azerbaijan-e Sharqi Province, D. marginatus is considered as target of control whereas in Hamadan, Yazd and Kurdistan Provinces, Hyalomma ticks (e g, H. marginatum) are the most important vectors, tick control measures may be focused on domestic mammals and animal housings especially with reference to behaviorally unusual ridiculous ticks, H. detritum and H. anatolicum (Telmadarraiy et al. 2004, Salari-Lak et al. 2008, Nasiri et al. 2010). Hyalomma and other ticks can parasi- tize small wild rodents (Rattus norvegicus, Rhombomys opimus, Tatera indica, Meriones libycus, Meriones hurrianae and the lesser mouse eared bat, Myotis blythii) (Kia et al. 2009, Tajedin et al. 2009, Vatandoost et al. 2010, Nateghpour et al. 2013). The control measures of livestock ticks recommended by the Iranian Veterinary Organization includ- ing the application of Acaricides, at animal housing, as anti tick bathroom and pure on or spot on domestic animals (Rezaii 2014). Infusing Ivermectin is currently being used as a relative chief anti tick method in the Iranian ruminants, but concerning its harm- ful residues on animals products (milk and meat), it is not advised by the Iranian Veteri- nary Organization. Flumethrin is also report- ed as a pesticide suitable for the control of hard and soft ticks especially Hyalomma tick parasitizing livestock whenever use as pour- on host (Vatandoost et al. 2012). Conclusion The high frequency of tick species which are infected to CCHF virus reveals that unlike a most common idea which believes that Hyalomma species are the main vectors of CCHF virus, other ticks including Rhipi- cephalus, Haemaphysalis and Dermacentor can be reservoir of this virus; thus, consider- ing geographical distribution, type of host and environmental conditions, different tick control measurements should be acquired in areas with high incidence of CCHF disease. Acknowledgements We would like to appreciate staffs of the Laboratory of Arboviruses and Viral Hemor- rhagic Fevers, Institute of Pasteur of Iran as national Reference Laboratory, for their technical support. We would also like to thank students of Department of Medical En- tomology and Vector Control of School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences for their efforts in collecting and identifying tick specimens. Our sincere thanks go to Engs. Tigi and Zarei, Dr Hosseini, Dr Shakeri, and Ms Shirzaiiyan-Zaroni for their kind helps in this research. This study was financially supported by the grant offered by Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests. References Achrafi A, Noriyan A (1966) The report first observation of hemorrhagic fever in one region located in vills of Azarbaijan-e-Sharqi. J Fac Med Univ Tabriz. 6: 182–188. Appannanavar SB, Mishra B (2011) An up- date on Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever. J Global Infect Dis. 3: 285–292. Ardoin A, Karimi Y (1982) Foyer de purpura thrombocytopenique en Iran dans l’Azerbaidjan de l’est. Med Trop. 42: 319–326. http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online March 11, 2015 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2015, 9(2): 137–147 Z Telmadarraiy et al.: Vectors of Crimean … 144 Asefi V (1974) Etude clinique de 60 patients atteints d’un syndrome infectieux et hemorragique en Azerbaidjan l’est (Iran). Iran J Public Health. 3: 140-146 [In French]. Barmaki A, Rafinejad J, Vatandoost H, Telmadarraiy Z, Mohtarami F, Leghaei SH, Oshaghi MA (2010) Study on presence of Borrelia persica in soft ticks in western Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 4: 19–25. Champour M, Mohammadi GR, Chinikar S, Razmi GR, Shah-Hosseini N, Khaki- firouz S, Mostafavi E, Jalali T (2014) Seroepidemiology of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in one-humped camels (Camelus dromedarius) pop- ulation in northeast of Iran. J Vector Borne Dis. 51: 62–65. Chinikar S (2007) Crimean-Congo hemor- rhagic fever infection in Iran. In: Ergonul O, Whitehouse CA (Eds.): Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever: A global perspective. Springer, Dor- drecht Netherlands. Chinikar S, Ghiasi SM, Moradi M, Goya MM, Shirzadi MR, Zeinali M, Meshkat M, Bouloy M (2010) Geographical distri- bution and surveillance of Crimean- Congo hemorrhagic fever in Iran. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 10: 705–708. Chinikar S, Ghiasi SM, Naddaf S, Piazak N, Moradi M, Razavi MR, Afzali N, Haeri A, Mostafavizadeh K, Ataei B, Khalilifard-Brojeni M, Husseini SM, Bouloy M (2012) Serological evalu- ation of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in humans with high-risk pro- fessions living in enzootic regions of Isfahan Province of Iran and genetic analysis of circulating strains. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 12: 733–738. Chumakov MP (1965) A short review of in- vestigation of the virus of Crimean hemorrhagic fever. In: Chumakov MP (Ed.) Endemic viral infections (hem- orrhagic fever with renal syndrome, Crimean hemorrhagic fever, Omsk hemorrhagic fever, and Astrakhan vi- rus from Hyalomma pl. plumbeum tick). Sbor Trudy Inst Polio Virus Entsef Akad Med Nauk SSSR, Mos- cow, USSR. Chumakov MP, Ismailova ST, Rubin SG, Smirnova SE, Zgurskaya GN, Khankishiev AS, Berezin VV, Solovei EA (1970) Detection of Crimean hem- orrhagic fever foci in Azerbaijan SSR from results from serological investi- gations of domestic animals. Trudy Inst Polio Virus Entsef Akad Med Nauk SSSR. 18: 120–122. Eldridge BF, Scott TV, Day JF, Tabachnick WJ (2004) Arbovirus diseases. In: El- dridge BF, Edman JD (Eds.): Medical entomology a textbook on public health and veterinary problems caused by arthropods. Kluwer Academic Pub- lishers, Netherlands. Filippova NA, Neronov VM, Farhang-Azad A (1976) Data on ixodid tick fauna (Acarina, Ixodidae) of small mammals in Iran. Entomol Obozreniye. 55: 467– 479. Hoogstraal H (1979) The epidemiology of tick- borne Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever in Asia, Europe, and Africa. J Med Entomol. 15: 307–417. Hoogstraal H (1985) Argasid and Nuttalliellid ticks as parasites and vectors. Adv Parasitol. 24: 135–238. Hosseini-Chegeni A, Hosseine R, Tavakoli M, Telmadarraiy Z, Abdigoudarzi M (2013) The Iranian Hyalomma (Acari: Ixodidae) with a key to the identi- fication of male species. Persian J Acarol. 2: 503–529. Hosseini-Chegeni A, Tavakoli M (2013) Argas vespertilionis (Ixodida: Argasidae): A parasite of Pipistrel bat in Western Iran. Persian J Acarol. 2: 321–330. Hosseini-Chegeni A, Telmadarraiy Z, Salimi http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 11, 2015 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2015, 9(2): 137–147 Z Telmadarraiy et al.: Vectors of Crimean … 145 M, Arzamani K, Banafshi O (2014) A record of Haemaphysalis erinacei (Acari: Ixodidae) collected from Hedgehog and an identification key for the spe- cies of Haemaphysalis occurring in Iran. Persian J Acarol. 3: 203–215. Hosseini A, Dalimi A, Abdigoudarzi M (2011) Morphometric study on male specimens of Hyalomma anatolicum (Acari: Ixodidae) in west of Iran. J Ar- thropod-Borne Dis. 5: 23–31. Hosseini A, Tavakoli M (2012) A taxonomic study on hard ticks Hyalomma marginatum species group (Acari: Ixodidae) in Iran. Proceeding of 1st In- ternational and 8th National Congress of Parasitology and Parasitic Disease in Iran, October 16-18, Kerman, Iran. Izadi S, Holakouie-Naieni K, Majdzadeh SR, Rakhshani F, Chinikar S, Nadim A, Hooshmand B (2003) Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever in Sistan and Baluchesatan Province of Iran, a case- control study about epidemiological char- acteristics. J Vet Fac Univ Tehran. 57: 27–32. Kamali K, Ostovan H, Atamehr A (2001) A catalog of mites and ticks (Acari) of Iran. Islamic Azad University Scien- tific Publication Center, Tehran, Iran. Keshtkar-Jahromi M, Sajadi MM, Ansari H, Mardani M, Holakouie-Naieni K (2013) Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Iran. Antiviral Res. 100: 20–28. Kia EB, Moghddas-Sani H, Hassanpoor H, Vatandoost H, Zahabiun F, Akhavan AA, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Telmadarraiy Z (2009) Ectoparasites of rodents cap- tured in Bandar Abbas, southern Iran. J Arthropod-Borne Dis. 3: 44–49. Labbaf-Ghasemi R (2006) The most im- portant Iranian programs for control of communicable diseases. In: Hatami H, Razavi SM, Eftekhar AH, Majlesi F, Sayed Nozadi M, Parizadeh SMJ (Eds.): The textbook of public health. Ministry of Health and Medical Edu- cation (Iran), Tehran Iran [In Persian]. Linthicum KJ, Bailey CL (1994) Ecology of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever. In: Sonenshine DE, Mather TN (Eds.): Eco- logical dynamics of tick-borne zoonoses. Oxford University press, Oxford, UK. Maghami G (1968) External parasites of livestocks in Iran. Arch Inst Razi Iran. 20: 81–83. Mazlum Z (1971) Ticks of domestic animals in Iran: geographic distribution, host relation, and seasonal activity. J Vet Fac Univ Tehn Iran. 27: 1–32 [In Persian]. Mehravaran A, Moradi M, Telmadarraiy Z, Mostafavi E, Moradi AR, Khakifirouz S, Shah-Hosseini N, Sadat-Rasi-Varaie F, Jalali T, Hekmat S, Ghiasi SM, Chinikar S (2013) Molecular detection of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus in ticks from southeast- ern Iran. Ticks Tick-borne Dis. 4: 35–38. Moradi AR, Chinikar S, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Houlakoui-Naeini K, Zahirnia AH, Telmadarraiy Z (2008) Molecular detection of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus in ticks (Ixodidae, Argasidae) of Hamedan Province, Iran. Biochem Cell Arch. 8: 119–123. Morovvati A, Ghalyanchi-Langeroudi A, Soleimani M, Mousavi-Nasab SD, Majidzadeh AK (2014) Emergence of a new genotype of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in Iran. Ira- nian J Virol. 6: 24–29. Nasiri A, Telmadarraiy Z, Vatandoost H, Chinikar S, Moradi A, Oshaghi MA, Salim abadi Y, Sheikh Z (2010) Tick infestation rate of sheep and their dis- tribution in Abdanan county, Ilam Prov- ince, Iran, 2007–2008. J Arthropod- Borne Dis. 4: 56–60. Nateghpour M, Akhavan AA, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Telmadarraiy Z, Ayazian Mavi S, Hosseine Vasoukolaei N, Motevalli- http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 11, 2015 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2015, 9(2): 137–147 Z Telmadarraiy et al.: Vectors of Crimean … 146 Haghi A, Akbarzadeh K (2013) Wild rodents and their ectoparasites in Balu- chistan area, southeast of Iran. Trop Biomed. 30: 72–77. Nuttall PA (2001) Crimean–Congo haemor- rhagic fever. In: Service MW (Ed.) Encyclopedia of arthropod-transmitted infections of man and domesticated animals. CABI Publishing, New York, USA. Oshaghi MA, Rafinejad J, Choubdar N, Piazak N, Vatandoost H, Telmadarraiy Z, Mohtarami F, Ravasan NM (2011) Discrimination of relapsing fever Borrelia persica and Borrelia microtti by diagnostic species-specific primers and polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 11: 201–207. Rafinejad J, Choubdar N, Oshaghi MA, Piazak N, Satvat T, Mohtarami F, Barmaki A (2011) Detection of Borrelia persica infection in Ornithodoros tholozani using PCR targeting rrs gene and xenodiagnosis. J Arthropod-Borne Dis. 40: 138–145. Rafyi A, Maghami G (1965) Etat actuel de nos connaissances les Argasidae de l'Iran. Arch Inst Razi Iran. 17: 1–16. Rafyi A, Rak H (1985) Parasitology of ar- thropods (entomology). Tehran Uni- versity Perss, Tehran Iran [In Persian]. Rahbari S, Nabian S, Shayan P (2007) Pri- mary report on distribution of tick fau- na in Iran. Parasitol Res. 101: S175– S177. Rezaii AA (2014) Executive instructions of office of health and management of animal diseases. Iranian Veterinary Or- ganization, Tehran Iran [In Persian]. Saidi S, Casals J, Faghih MA (1975) Crimean hemorrhagic fever-Congo (CHF-C) virus antibodies in man and domestic and small mammals in Iran. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 24: 353–357. Salari-Lak S, Vatandoost H, Telmadarraiy Z, Entezar-Mahdi R, Kia EB (2008) Sea- sonal activity of ticks and their im- portance in tick-borne infectious dis- eases in west Azerbaijan, Iran. J Ar- thropod-Borne Dis. 2: 28–34. Salim-Abadi Y, Chinikar S, Telmadarraiy Z, Vatandoost H, Moradi M, Oshaghi MA, Ghiasi SM (2011) Crimean-Congo hem- orrhagic fever: a molecular survey on hard ticks (Ixodidae) in Yazd Province, Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 4: 61–63. Shirani M, Asmar M, Chinikar S, Mirahmadi R, Piazak N, Mazaheri V (2004) De- tection of CCHF virus in soft ticks (Argasidae) by RT-PCR method. J In- fect Dis Trop Med. 9: 11–15. Shirzadi MR (2003) Crimean-Congo hemor- rhagic fever and other viral hemor- rhagic fevers. Seda publication, Tehran Iran [In Persian]. Sonenshine DE, Lane RS, Nicholson WL (2002) Ticks (Ixodida). In: Mullen GR, Durden LA (Eds.): Medical and veteri- nary entomology. Academic Press, San Diego, USA. Sureau P, Klein JM (1980) Arbovirus en Iran. Méd Trop. 40: 549–554. Sureau P, Klein JM, Casals J, Digoutte JP, Salaun JJ, Piazak N, Calvo MA (1980) Isolement des virus Thogoto, Wad Medani, Wanowrie et de la fievre hemorragique de Crimée-Congo en Iran à partir de tiques d’animaux domestiques. Annu Virol (Institue Pas- teur). 131: 185–200. Tahmasebi F, Ghiasi SM, Mostafavi E, Moradi M, Piazak N, Mozafari A, Haeri A, Fooks AR, Chinikar S (2010) Molecular epidemiology of Crimean- Congo hemorrhagic fever virus genome isolated from ticks of Hamadan Prov- ince of Iran. J Vector Borne Dis. 47: 211–216. Tajedin L, Rassi Y, Oshaghi MA, Telmadarraiy Z, Akhavan AA, Abai MR, Arandian MH (2009) Study on ectoparasites of http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 11, 2015 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, December 2015, 9(2): 137–147 Z Telmadarraiy et al.: Vectors of Crimean … 147 Rhombomys opimus, the main reservoir of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in endemic foci in Iran. J Arthropod- Borne Dis. 3: 41–45. Tavakoli M, Hosseini-Chegeni A, Mehdifar D (2012) Occurrence of morphologic var- iability in tick Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum (Acari: Ixodidae). Iranian J Vet Med. 6: 177–185. Telmadarraiy Z, Bahrami A, Vatandoost H (2004) A survey on fauna of ticks in west Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Iran J Public Health. 33: 65–69. Telmadarraiy Z, Ghiasi SM, Moradi M, Vatandoost H, Eshraghian MR, Faghihi F, Zarei Z, Haeri A, Chinikar S (2009) A survey of Crimean-Congo haemor- rhagic fever in livestock and ticks in Ardabil Province, Iran during 2004– 2005. Scand J Infect Dis. 2: 37–41. Telmadarraiy Z, Moradi AR, Vatandoost H, Mostafavi E, Oshaghi MA, Zahirnia AH, Haeri A, Chinikar S (2008a) Cri- mean-Congo hemorrhagic fever: a seroepidemiological and molecular sur- vey in Bahar, Hamadan Province of Iran. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 3: 321–327. Telmadarraiy Z, Tighi S, Chinikar S, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Rassi Y, Mirahmadi R, Zarei Z, Ahmadnezhad P, Rafinejad J, Jedari M, Aboulhasani M, Mohtarami M, Faghihi F, Mashrabi M (2008b) Immunological and serological study on the infectivity of host animals and ticks (Ixodidae, Argasidae) to CCHF vi- rus in east Azerbaijan, Iran. 17th Inter- national Congress for Tropical Medi- cine and Malaria, Jeju Korea. Vatandoost H, Moradi Asl E, Telmadarraiy Z, Mohebali M, Masoumi Asl H, Abai MR, Zarei Z (2012) Field efficacy of flumethrin pour-on against livestock ticks in Iran. Int J Acarol. 38: 457–464. Vatandoost H, Telmadarraiy Z, Sharifi M, Moradi A, Kamali M, Taran M (2010) Ectoparasites of lesser mouse eared bat, Myotis blythii from Kermanshah Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 3: 371–373. Watts DM, Ksiazek TG, Linthicum KJ, Hoogstraal H (1988) Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever. In: Monath TP (Ed.) The Arboviruses: epidemiology and ecology. CRC Press, Florida USA. Whitehouse CA (2004) Crimean-Congo hem- orrhagic fever. Antiviral Res. 64: 145– 160. http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 11, 2015