J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 Original Article Notes on the Iran Caddisflies and Role of Annulipalpian Hydropsychid Caddisflies as a Bio-monitoring Agent Naseh Malekei-Ravasan 1, Abbas Bahrami 1, Mansoreh Shayeghi 1, Mohamad Ali Oshaghi 1, Masomeh Malek 2, Allah Bedasht Mansoorian 3, *Hassan Vatandoost 1 1Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2Department of Biology, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran 3Department of Parasitology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Received 20 Nov 2012; accepted 9 Feb 2013) Abstract Background: Eco-faunistic studies are inevitable step in environmental researches. Aquatic organisms like caddisflies are known as biological indicators for water quality assessment and water resource management. They have special role for energy flow in the freshwater habitats as food web and food chain among aquatic creatures. Methods: In addition to an extensive literature review on Iran Caddisflies, a field study was carried out in Lavasan river flows in north east of Tehran to collect aquatic insects using D-frame nets and or direct search on stone beneath. The water quality was measured using analytical method. Results: Literature revealed record of 62 trichopterid species in the country comprising 14 families. The most abun- dant species belonged to the Hydropsychidae. Herein we report presence of the Annulipalpian Hydropsyche sciligra H Malicky, 1977 in the study area. Habitat water quality of H. sciligra resembled human drinkable water. However presence of snail, Physa acuta and fish Capoeta buhsei in the water sampling area indicated inferior quality. Conclusion: From ecological point of view caddisfly larvae are predators of most important medical vectors like mosquitoes, blackflies and midges. Also they are useful and important indicator for monitoring physicochemical effects in the nature, so that they can be used for bio-monitoring program. From medical point of view, wing hairs or other body parts of caddisflies can be inhalant and contact allergens in Trichopterists and in sensitive individuals who come in contact. Key words: Caddisfly, Hydropsyche, Faunistics, Bio-monitoring, Iran Introduction Trichoptera, is one of the largest insect orders presenting in aquatic ecosystems. The order in- cludes 3 suborders Spicipalpia, Annulipalpia and Integripalpia each one containing four, eight, and 33 families, respectively. The aquatic larvae assemble a portable case (Integripalpia, and two of four families of “Spicipalpia”) or fixed retreat (Annulipalpia), except for those of a pair of “free-living” spicipalpian families. The net, retreat, case, and pupal structures of caddisfly larvae that filter fine organic mat- ter or larger particles are among the most in- tricate and complex structures built by in- sects, at least among the non-social orders (Holzenthal et al. 2007). Trichoptera and Lepidoptera, concoct the Amphiesmenoptera super order (Kristensen 1991). Their presenting and archaic lineages diversification ascribe to the Triassic and the middle Jurassic respectively. The earliest pro- totrichopteran dates to the mid-early Permian (Kristensen 1997). So, Trichoptera depict a sig- nificant and important branch on the tree of life, whose present distribution and bioge- *Corresponding author: Dr Hassan Vatandoost, Email: hvatandoost1@yahoo.com, vatando@tums.ac.ir 71 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 ography is reflective of those past events that have affected the distribution and diversi- fication of earth’s entire freshwater biota. For instance extinction of an endemic alpine caddis fly, Rhyacophila angelieri (Rhyacophilidae) was predicted with reduced melt water in- puts (Brown et al. 2007). The role of Trichopteran larvae in trophic dy- namics and energy flow in the freshwater hab- itats seems to be inevitable (Resh and Rosen- berg 1984). Both of habitats and inhabitants of these ecosystems affected strongly and en- vironmentally intimidated. Trichoptera are ap- plicable and important for monitoring phys- icochemical effects, and are widely used in biomonitoring programs in developed coun- tries (Lenat 1993, Resh and Unzicker 1975, Dohet 2002). Hydropsychidae Curtis (1835), with about 1,500 described species, is the 3rd largest fam- ily in Trichoptera and the most diverse of the net-spinning Annulipalpians. Five subfamilies are currently recognized: Arctopsychinae, Macronematinae, Hydropsychinae, Diplect- roninae, and Smicrideinae. Hydropsychinae contains 19 prevalently genera from all bioge- ographic regions, which the largest genera in- clude Hydropsyche Pictet (275 species), Cera- topsche Ross and Unzicker, often considered a subgenus of Hydropsyche (100 species), and Cheumatopsyche Wallengren (260 species) (Schefter 1996, Holzenthal et al. 2007). Hydropsychid larva exhibits a large spec- trum of tolerance values and is used in bio- monitoring programs throughout the world. For example, North Carolina Biotic Index (NCBI) tolerance values for hydropsychids range from 0.0 for H. carolina ranks to 8.8 for H. betteni Ross (on a scale of 0–10, with 0= least tolerant of pollution) (Lenat 1993). One of the major environmental issues that the world faces today is the water crisis (Aldhous 2003). Industrial activities and ur- banization have raised pollution in rivers, streams, and lakes in developing countries. Most sewage enters waterways without ade- quate treatment, and the water quality is be- ing degraded (Langergraber and Muellegger 2005). Loss of freshwater for human con- sumption is correlated with cease to existing aquatic biodiversity. A critical step is to de- scribe aquatic biota to help developing coun- tries build efficient, fast, and inexpensive techniques to diagnose and monitor negative perturbations to water quality. The use of aquat- ic organisms as indicators of water quality is a standard method in management of water resources. The pros and cones of the use of macro-invertebrates in biological monitoring were outlined. Among the pros is that the tax- onomy of many groups is very well known and identification keys are available. This pro is true for the United States and Europe, and Australia, but lack of taxonomic knowledge and identification manuals is the greatest barrier to the development of biological mon- itoring studies in other regions like our country (Resh 1995, Bonada et al. 2006). The Iranian Trichoptera fauna mostly was studied by non-autochthonous researchers (Schmid 1959, Malicky 1986, Mirmoayedi and Malicky 2002, Mey 2004, Malicky 2004, Chvojka 2006) based on collections of 62 spe- cies from the 23 provinces of Iran. Despite the evolutionary, ecological, environmental, and adorable importance of the Trichoptera, there is a little knowledge about ecology with emphasizing habitat characteristics of Iranian Trichoptera. So, to cover this brevity firstly we collected some caddisflies, then listed families presenting in Iran with emphasizing Hydropsychidae family species and finally measured water quality of surrounding larval habitat and some ecological features of Lavasan district, Tehran, capital of Iran. Materials and Methods This bi-seasonal (summer/winter) study was conducted on Lavasan River runs in Northeast of Tehran capital of Iran. The rampant climate of the region is cold Mediterranean. Water 72 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 temperature was measured using thermom- eter during sampling. We collected immature stages of the Trichoptera by D-frame nets and/or removing river floor stones from three different habitat types run, riffle and stream bank locating in the way of the run- ning water where larvae stick their retreat under/beside of the stones. The retreats and probably harboring immature insect pre- served in 70% ethanol and transferred to the School of Public Health (SPH) laboratory. The key morphological characters of the extract- ed immature Trichoptera plus retreats gen- eral feature were examined under micro- scope (Olympus SZX12) through taken high resolution photos. Water samples were col- lected in summer 2010, prior the seasonal rains start. The specimens were taken in autoclavable pyrex bottle w/cap 250 ml, previously acid- washed and rinsed with copious amounts of distilled water. Electrical conductivity (EC) and total dissolved solids (TDS) was meas- ured using EC/TDS HACH CO150 meter. The pH was determined using Suntex TS-2 pH meter. Color and turbidity of the water sam- ples were examined with HACH Data Logging Spectrophotometer 2010. The data was ana- lyzed to establish a relationship between the water quality and Trichoptera fauna. Results Totally seven caddises and only one larva (without retreat) was collected during two referral season in summer and winter 2010. Larval and pupal characteristics of H. sciligra are shown in figures 1 through 11 and 12 through 16 respectively. Faunistic investiga- tion was carried out and reinforced using two information resources including available pub- lished data on Iranian Trichoptera and the Tri- choptera World Checklist Database Search. The collected retreats were identified as Hydropsychid sp. (Fig. 12). With regard to being lethargic collected larva in the winter season, probably Trichoptera overwinter in larval stage in this region. Hydropsychidae Larvae of this family are easily separated from others by the hard sclerotized plates on the top of each thoracic segment and highly branched gills on venter of abdominal segments (Fig. 1,2). Each branched gills have 30 or more filaments on venter of thoracic segments and on most abdominal segments (Fig. 6). Larvae of Hydropsyche dis- tinguished from other hydropsychid genera by pair of large sclerites in inter-segmental fold posterior to prosternal plate of prosternum (Pescador and Rasmussen 1995). According to the World Checklist database (Morse 2010) there are 62 trichopterid spe- cies in Iran comprising 14 families. Suborders, families, number of species, Case/Retreat mak- ing, feeding type and Biotic Index Values (RBP) of Iran caddisflies are shown in table 1. On the basis of mentioned source 18 re- ported Iranian Hydropsychidae members are presented in Table 2. In addition to the caddisflies we collected two invasive following biota that may have impact on the results explanations. Bladder Snail, Physa acuta Draparnaud 1805 (Gastropoda: Physidae) This snail has cosmopolitan distribution and has been spread through human agency around the world (Dillon et al. 2002). It is prevalent in lentic waters, especially in rich, disturbed and/or artificially eutrophic environments. P. acuta is a “weedy” or R-selected species (Dillon 2000). Its rapid maturation, high re- productive rate, and ease of culture have made it the “fruit fly of malacology”. P. acuta is easily the most successful physid, having been dispersed worldwide and found in a va- riety of few habitats. It is a generalist and re- production selected. It can survive well under harsh conditions, as long as they are short- lived. Other life-cycle characteristics are high 73 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 proliferation rates, high passive dispersal ca- pacities and high tolerance to polluted water (Bernot et al. 2005). A high adaptability to changing environmental characters is thought to enhance invasiveness of P. acuta (Kefford and Nugegoda 2005). Capoeta buhsei Kessler, 1877 Cyprinidae (Synonym: Varicorhinus nikolskii Derjavin, 1929) Capoeta was reviewed by Karaman (1969) who recognized seven species that two of them, C. buhsei and C. fusca are restricted to Iran. C. buhsei, ray-finned fish, a benthopelagic spe- cies in freshwater systems, is found in the Lake Namak basin, Iran. C. buhsei has been assessed as least concern due to its relatively large range, and a lack of widespread threats in the area (Bianco and Banarescu 1982, Coad 1998, Devi and Boguskaya 2009, Krupp and Schneider 1989). Analyzing water quality Water quality of Lavasan river in the summer 2010 was measured and its mean physico- chemical characteristics at the time of sam- pling were as follow: EC 376 µ s/cm, pH 8.43, TDS 188 mg/L, NTU 13.7 NTU, water temperature (at noontime and 50 cm depth) 22.2 ºC. Table 1. Suborders, families, number of species, case/retreat making, feeding type and Biotic Index Values (RBP) of Iran caddisflies are shown Suborder Family No of species Case/Retreat making feeding group Biotic Index Values (RBP) A n n u li p al p ia Ecnomidae 2 fixed retreat Predator, Collectors. 0.0 Hydropsychidae 18 fixed retreat Collector (filterer) 4.0 Polycentropodidae 2 fixed retreat Collector/Shredder/Predator 6.0 Pseudoneureclipsidae 2 fixed retreat grazers 0.0 Psychomyiidae 8 fixed retreat Collector (gatherer) 2.0 Philopotamidae 3 fixed retreat Collector (filterer) 3.0 In te gr ip al p ia Leptoceridae 5 portable case Shredder/Collector/Predator 4.0 Sericostomatidae 1 portable case Shredder/Collector (gather) 3.0 Lepidostomatidae 3 portable case Shredder 1.0 Limnephilidae 5 portable case Scraper/Shredder 4.0 S p ic ip al p ia Glossosomatidae 2 portable case Scraper/Collector (gatherer) 0.0 Hydroptilidae 9 portable case, fixed retreat, free-living Piercer/Scraper/Shredder 4.0 Hydrobiosidae 1 free-living Predator 0.0 Rhyacophilidae 1 portable case Predator/Scraper 0.0 Data for Biotic Index Values (RBP) column from Hilsenhoff WL (1988) 74 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 Table 2. 18 type species records of Hydropsychidae from Iran and neighborhood countries Subfamily Taxon Distribution Region Reference Diplectroninae Diplectrona vairya Iran Albania Baharestan Mirmoayedi and Malicky, 2002 Olah, 2010 Hydropsychinae Cheumatopsyche processuata Iran,India,Paki- stan,Myanmar and Vietnam ***** Mirmoayedi and Malicky, 2002 Olah et al 2008 Olah and Johanson, 2008 Hydropsyche consanguinea Iran Iran Iraq Chalus, Damavand, Azarbaijan-E-Gharbi (Takht Soleyman), Lorestan (Lenje Abad) Chvojka, 2006 Mirmoayedi and Malicky, 2002 Al-Zubaki and Al-Kayalt, 1987 Hydropsyche demavenda (Syn: H. integrate) Iran China Damavand Mirmoayedi and Malicky, 2002 Huang et al 2005 Hydropsyche djabai Iran Iran Turkey Azarbaijan-E-Gharbi (Takht Soleyman), Minoudasht, Golestan- Forst, Damavand Mirmoayedi and Malicky, 2002 Chvojka, 2006 Sipahiler, 2004 Hydropsyche mahrkusha Iran Turkey Turkey Mazandaran, Alborz- Gebirge, Chalus-Karadj Assalem- Hashtpar, Moghan Mirmoayedi and Malicky, 2002 Sipahiler, 2004 Sipahiler, 2007 Hydropsyche ressli Iran Turkey Alborz Valley, Chalus Mirmoayedi and Malicky, 2002 Sipahiler, 2007 Hydropsyche sakarawaka (Syn: H. remmerii) Iran Chalus-Karaj Mirmoayedi and Malicky, 2002 Hydropsyche sciligra (Syn: H. gracilis) Iran Turkey Caucasus North site of Alborz, Chalus, Makou, Qazvin, Minoudasht Mirmoayedi and Malicky, 2002 Sipahiler, 2007 Ivanov, 2011 Hydropsyche supersonica Iran Iran Gilan (Gichob), Nowshahr Mirmoayedi and Malicky, 2002 Chvojka, 2006 Hydropsyche iokaste Iran Amol- Chalus Mirmoayedi and Malicky, 2002 Hydropsyche bujnurdica Iran Bojnurd Botosaneanu, 1998 Potamyia psamathe Iran Bushehr Chvojka, 2006 Cheumatopsyche flavellata Iran Iran Turkey Tehran (Eyn Varzan), Minoudasht, Rasht, Fars (Firuz Abad, Khollar), Khuzestan (Izeh) Mey, 2004 Chvojka, 2006 Olah, 2010 Cheumatopsyche persica Iran Iran Turkey Hormozgan (Khoshangan), Khuzestan (Si Mili, Izeh) Azarbaijan-E-Gharbi (Chuplu), Kermanshah (Khosrow Abad), Fars (Posht Chenar, Firuz Abad), Lorestan (Bavineh), Zanjan (Sorkheh Dizaj), Chaharmahal Va Bakhtiyari and Kerman Mey, 2004 Chvojka, 2006 Olah, 2010 Hydropsyche esfahanica Iran Isfahan Mey, 2004 Hydropsyche lundaki Iran Hamadan (Alanje) Chvojka, 2006 Hydropsyche masula Iran Masuleh River Olah and KA Johanson, 2008 *****= unknown 75 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 Fig. 1. Free living larva Fig. 2. Larval sclerites (found in the retreat) Fig. 3. Larval anal projections Fig. 4. Prosternum Fig. 5. Anterior part of the body showing trochantin and long antennae Fig. 6. Abdominal gills, with up to 10 filaments Fig. 7. Dorsum of abdomen showing club hairs 76 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 Fig. 8. Distinctly yellow V- shaped mark on the frontoclypeus Fig. 9. Two large brown smudges underside view of head capsule Fig. 10. Robust prothoracic leg Fig. 11. Sclerites on the abdominal sternum VIII and IX Fig. 12. Retreat containing pharate adult (late pupa) of H. sciligra Fig. 13. extracted pharate adult Fig. 14. pupal anal projections 77 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 Fig. 15. Features on the abdominal segments. Fig. 16. Features with more resolution on the ab- dominal segments Discussion Faunistic studies of geographical areas, such as countries, states, watersheds, bio-geograph- ical regions, or even conservation areas, are a very important resource for environmental studies. Ecologists, taxonomists and natural resource managers benefit from these data. Iran caddisflies were collected from 23 provinces including Azarbaijan-E-Gharbi, Azarbaijan- E-Sharqi, Ardebil, Esfahan, Fars, Gilan, Ma- zandaran, Golestan, Tehran, Alborz, Qazvin, Hamadan, Hormozgan, Kerman, Kermanshah, Khuzestan, Kordestan, Lorestan, Sistan va Baluchestan, Bushehr, North Khorsan, Cha- harmahal bakhtiari and Zanjan provinces mostly by non-autochthonous researchers. Caddisfly species of Iran are more prevalent along the Alborz and less along Zagros moun- tain ranges. From the literatures the northern fauna of Iran clearly close to the European- Mediterranean fauna, whereas, in the southern part of the country there is a gap which con- nects Africa and South Asia (Malicky 1986). In this study we collect specimens from Tehran province and evaluated some mor- phological characters like head, thorax, legs, and abdomen accessories on both larva and late pupa body but we don’t find any simi- larity in introduced species in manuals and published Hydropsychidae keys. Except for chetotaxi standpoint that our collecting larva due to lacking minute spines and scale hairs but having club hairs on dorsum of abdomen (Fig. 7) was very similar to the Hydropsyche (Ceratopsyche) sparna (Pescador and Ras- mussen, 1995). Although all collecting spec- imens in our study were identified as Hyd- ropsyche sciligra (H Malicky 1977 Synonym: H. gracilis AV Martynov, 1909) by Vladimir D. Ivanov, an expert trichopterologists from Russia, however, further molecular investi- gations are under processing to complete spe- cies taxonomy confirmation. This species were reported only from Iran, Turkey and Cauca- sus and there is no any report from other part of the world (Morse 2010). Nevertheless, the Iranian caddisfly fauna is still incipient, and data are lacking from many regions. Insect faunas present in the fluvial water - bodies provide a valuable resource to increase our understanding of both succession pat- terns of ecosystem development at individ- ual sites and spatial comparisons between sites of a similar age (Amoros et al. 1987) Morphological traits can be as predictors of niche requirements so appraisal of the aquatic macro-invertebrates will provide indication of water quality. Different macro-inverte- brates have different tolerances to pollution. Among the 4 categories of the water bugs sensitivity to pollution, caddisflies larvae to- gether with Alderflies and water mites are categorized as sensitive bugs (Hunter-Central Rivers Waterwatch). Family Hyropsychidae, are actually tolerant of poor water quality, but would be counted as indicators of good water quality with other Trichoptera in an 78 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 Ephemeroptera-Plecoptera-Trichoptera (EPT) Index (Voshell 2002). Water quality determines the ‘goodness’ of water for particular purposes. Our collecting water was colorless, odorless liquid, and maybe with an insipid taste. On the basis of WHO guidelines these samples were gener- ally clean even drinkable (WHO Geneva, 2008). Indian recommended standard for drinking water quality parameters for pH, Turbidity (NTU), TDS (mg/L) and EC (µ s/ cm) are 6.5–8.5, 5, 500 and 400 respectively (IS: 10500 1991). Three cases of our results fall into these categories except for TDS that was 2.5 times less than introduced value. EC and TDS of presented in this study is reagent of freshwater rivers characteristics. Meanwhile we collected some snails and some fish against these guidelines indicating inferior quality of water and its contamination with human and animal excretions. Probable reasons for these controversial findings may be due to ecological changes as a result of growing urbanization in Lavasan River up- stream. Another less important reason may be related to geographical condition of the place. Lavasan district have a temperate climate and because of vicinity to Tehran metropolis, where many mansions and coun- try houses belonging to wealthy families were built there in recent year. So reliability of aquatic insects versus water samples as measures of aquatic ecosystems safety must be noticed with more subtlety. As we see, in one hand both the literature review (Brown et al. 2007) and current study indicate that caddisflies are good agent for bio-monitoring and on the other hand or- ganisms like the snail (P. acuta) and the fish (C. buhsei) couldn’t be a suitable indicator due to high adaptability to changing environ- mental characters so these vicissitudes must be explored through monitoring of physico- chemical characteristics. Salinity, a measure of the dissolved salts in the water, is measured as either TDS or as EC. A sample’s EC can be converted to TDS and vice versa. Sources of salinity include urban and rural run-off containing salt, ferti- lizers and organic matter. Land use issues related to high levels of salinity include clearing of vegetation and the resultant rise in the water table, excessive irrigation, groundwater seepage and runoff containing dissolved sol- ids from industry, sewage, and agriculture and storm water. While an appropriate con- centration of salts is vital for aquatic plants and animals, salinity that is beyond the normal range for any species of organism will cause stress or even death to that organism (Hunter- Central Rivers Waterwatch). The accepted taste threshold for TDS is 500–1000 mg/L. Very low TDS can leave water tasting flat. High TDS is associated with scaling corro- sion and possibly unhealthy levels of salt. For non drinking purpose up to 1800 mg/L can be managed with frequent check on taps and infrastructure for scale build up (WHO, Geneva 2008). The units of turbidity from a calibrated nephelometer are called Nephelometric Tur- bidity Units (NTU). To some extent, how much light reflects for a given amount of particulates is dependent upon properties of the particles like their shape, color, and re- flectivity. Suspended solids usually enter the water as a result of soil erosion from dis- turbed land or can be traced to the inflow of effluent from sewage plants or industry. Turbidity measurements also take into ac- count algae and plankton present in the water (Hunter-Central Rivers Waterwatch). WHO establishes that the turbidity of drinking water shouldn't be more than 5 NTU, and should ideally be below 1 NTU. Therefore, low NTU values indicate high water clarity, while high NTU values indicate low water clarity. (WHO, Geneva 2008). pH varies naturally within streams as a result of photosynthesis. Geology, soils types and different runoff affect pH. Extreme values of pH can cause problems for aquatic fauna. A 79 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 pH range of 6.5–8 is optimal for freshwater (Hunter-Central Rivers Waterwatch). Temperature of a waterway is significant be- cause it affects the amount of dissolved ox- ygen in the water. The amount of oxygen that will dissolve in water increases as temperature decreases. Water at 0 °C will hold up to 14.6 mg of oxygen per liter, while at 30 °C it will hold only up to 7.6 mg/L. Temperature also affects the rate of photosynthesis of plants, the metabolic rate of aquatic animals, rates of development, timing and success of reproduc- tion, mobility, migration patterns and the sen- sitivity of organisms to toxins, parasites and disease. Life cycles of aquatic organisms are often related to changes in temperature. Tem- perature ranges for plants and animals can be affected by manmade structures such as dams and weirs and releases of water from them (Hunter-Central Rivers Waterwatch). While net-spinning and retreats maker caddisflies are filter feeders and use in bio- monitoring programs, free-living ones that build neither cases nor nets are predaceous on the most important medical vectors in- cluding mosquitoes, blackflies and midges and use in biological control programs. Lar- vae of hydrophilidae feed on mosquitoes larvae and are therefore relatively important pred- ators of mosquitoes (Hintz 1951, Nielson and Nielson 1953). The 2–3 cm long larvae of Phrynganea sp and Limnephilus sp have often observed capturing larvae of the snow- melt mosquitoes (Culicidae: Culiseta and Aedes) (Becker et al. 2010). Rhyacophila larvae are generally predaceous, feeding on Simu- liidae (black fly) larvae, Chironomidae (midge) larvae and pupae, and the pupae of other caddisflies (Thut 1969, Wiggins 2004). Caddisflies normally are not considered medically important insects. They can cause allergic responses (asthma and dermatitis) in sensitive individuals who come in contact with wing hairs or other body parts. Trichopterists who collect adult caddisflies by aspiration may receive significant exposure to wing hairs. The literature suggests that hypersensitivity to caddisflies may be quite common among allergy patients. The range of reported re- sponses is broad, ranging from minor annoy- ance to near incapacitation. Some patients sen- sitized by exposure to caddisfly antigens have developed cross-reactivity to shellfish and stings of venomous insects. This could result in life-threatening situations for individuals with a predisposition for severe igE-mediated reactions (anaphylaxis) due to contact with arthropod proteins (David E. Bowles) Acknowledgements We would like to thank Dr Vladimir D Ivanov, a thoroughbred trichopterologist, from the Department of Entomology, Faculty of Biology, Sent Petersburg State University for identifying and providing some good advises. We also express gratitude to Dr Mahmood Ali Mohammadi from Department of Environ- mental Health Engineering, SPH, TUMS for testing of water quality. References Aldhous P (2003) The world's forgotten cri- sis. Nature. 422: 251–253. Amoros C, Roux AL, Reygrobellet JL, Bravard JP, Pautou G (1987) A method for ap- plied ecological studies of fluvial hydro systems. Regul Rivers 1: 17–36. Becker N, Petric D, Zgomba M, Boase C, Madon M, Dahl C, Kaiser A (2010) Mosquitoes and their control. Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, New York. Bernot RJ, Kennedy EE, Lamberti GA (2005) Effects of ionic liquids on the survival, movement, and feeding behavior of the freshwater snail Physa acuta. Environ Toxicol Chem. 24: 1759–1765. Bianco PG, Banarescu P (1982) A contribution to the knowledge of the Cyprinidae of Iran (Pisces, Cypriniformes). Cybium. 6(2): 75–96. 80 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 Bonada N, Prat N, Resh VH, Statzner B (2006) Developments in Aquatic Insect Biomonitoring: A Comparative Analy- sis of Recent Approaches. Annu Rev Entomol. 51: 495–523. Bowles DE (1992) The medical importance of caddisflies. Braueria 19: 24. Brown LE, Hannah DM, Milner AM (2007) Vulnerability of alpine stream biodiver- sity to shrinking glaciers and snowpacks. Glob Change Biol. 13: 958–966. Chvojka P (2006) Contribution to the know- ledge of the caddisfly fauna (Trichoptera) of Iran: description of new species and new distributional data. Acta Entomol Mus Nat Pragae. 46: 245–255. Coad BW (1998) Systematic biodiversity in the freshwater fishes of Iran. Ital J Zool. 65: 101–108. Devi R, Boguskaya N (2009) Capoeta buhsei. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011. 2. Available at: http:// www.iucnredlist.org. Dillon RTJr, Wethington AR, Rhett JM, Smith TP (2002) Populations of the European freshwater pulmonate Physa acuta are not reproductively isolated from American Physa heterostropha or Physa integra. Invertebr Biol. 121(3): 226–234. Dillon RTJr (2000) The ecology of fresh- water molluscs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Dohet A (2002) Are caddisflies an ideal group for the biological assessment of water quality in streams? Nova Supplementa Entomologica (Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Trichop- tera). 15: 507–520. Hintz HW (1951) The role of certain arthro- pods in reducing mosquito populations of permanent ponds in Ohio. Ohio J Sci. 51: 277–279. Hilsenhoff WL (1988) Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family- level biotic index. J North Am Benthol Soc. 7: 65-68. Holzenthal RW, Blahnik RJ, Prather AL, Kjer KM (2007) Order Trichoptera Kirby, 1813, (Insecta), caddisflies. Zootaxa. 1668: 639–698. Hunter-Central Rivers Waterwatch, Water Quality Parameters and Indicators, Fact Sheet 2, Hunter-Central Rivers Catch- ment Management Authority, Available at: http://www.waterwatch.nsw.gov.au. IS: 10500 (1991) Indian standards for drinking water, Bureau of Indian Standards N. Delhi, India. 1–9: 179–182. Karaman MS (1969) Revision der Kleina- siatischen und Vorderasiatischen Arten der genus Capoeta (Varicorhinus partim) Mit. Hamburg Zoology Mus İnst. 66: 17–54. Kefford Ben J Nugegoda D (2005) No evi- dence for a critical salinity threshold for growth and reproduction in the freshwater snail Physa acuta. Environ Pollut. 134(3): 377. Kristensen NP (1991) Phylogeny of extant Hexapods, p. 125–140 in: Naumann ID (ed). In Insects of Australia. A Textbook for Students and Research Workers. Second edition, 1, CSIRO (publ.), Cornell University Press, Melbourne University Press, Ithaca, Melbourne. Kristensen NP (1997) Early Evolution of the Lepidoptera+Trichoptera Lineage: Phy- logeny and the Ecological Scenario. In Grandcolas, P. (editor), The Origin of Bi- odiversity in Insects: Phylogenetic Tests of Evolutionary Scenarios. Mém Mus Natn Hist Nat. 173: 253–271. Krupp F Schneider W (1989) The fishes of the Jordan River drainage basin and Azraq Oasis. Fauna Saudi Arabia. 10: 347–416. Langergraber G Muellegger E (2005) Eco- logical Sanitation-a way to solve global sanitation problems. Environ Int. 31: 433–444. 81 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2013, 7(1): 71–82 N Malekei-Ravasan et al.: Notes on the Iran… http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: April 10, 2013 Lenat DR (1993) A biotic index for the south- eastern United States: derivation and list of tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. J N Am Benthol Soc. 12: 279–290. Malicky H (1986) Die Köcherfliegen (Tri- choptera) des Iran und Afghanistans. Z Arbgem Öst Ent. 38: 1–16. Malicky H (2004) Neue Köcherfliegen aus Europa und Asien. Braueria. 31: 36–42. Mey W (2004) Beitrag zur Trichoptera-Fauna Armeniens und des Iran (Trichoptera). Entomol Nachr Ber. 48: 81–87. Mirmoayedi A Malicky H (2002) An updated check-list of caddisflies (Insecta, Tri- choptera) from Iran, with new records. Zool Middle East. 26: 163–168. Morse JC (Ed) (2010) Trichoptera World Checklist. Available at: http://entweb. clemson.edu/database/trichopt/index.ht m [accessed 15 March 2010]. Nielsen ET Nielsen AT (1953) Field obser- vations on the habits of Aedes taeniorhynchus. Ecology. 34: 141–156. Pescador ML Rasmussen AK (1995) Identi- fication manual for the caddisfly (Tri- choptera) larvae of florida, entomol- ogy center for water quality florida A and M University Tallahassee, Florida. Resh VH Rosenberg DM (1984) The ecology of aquatic insects. New York: Praeger Publishers, Holt Saunders Ltd. Resh VH (1995) Freshwater benthic mac- roinvertebrates and rapid assessment procedures for water quality monitor- ing in developing and newly indus- trialized countries, In: Davis, WaS, T (Ed) Biological Assessment and Criteria. Lewis Publishers, Boca Ration, Florida. 167–177. Resh VH Unzicker JD (1975) Water quality monitoring and aquatic organisms: the importance of species identification. J Water Pollut. Control Fed. 47: 9–19. Schefter PW (1996) Phylogenetic relationships among subfamily groups in the Hyd- ropsychidae (Trichoptera) with diag- noses of the Smicrideinae, new status, and the Hydropsychinae. J N Am Benthol Soc. 15: 615–633. Schmid F (1959) Trichoptères d’Iran. Beitr Entomol. 9: 200–219, 376–412, 683– 698, 760–799. Thut RN (1969) Feeding habits of larvae of seven Rhyacophila (Trichoptera: Rhya- cophilidae) species with notes on other life history features. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 62: 894–898. Voshell JR (2002) A Guide to Common Freshwater Invertebrates of North Amer- ica. Mc Donald and Woodward Pub- lishing Co. Blacksburg, VA. Wiggins GB (2004) Caddisflies: the under- water architects. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. WHO (2008) Guidelines for drinking-water quality [electronic resource]: incorpo- rating 1st and 2nd addenda, Vol.1, Rec- ommendations. 3rd ed. WHO, Geneva. 82