Microsoft Word - Dr Vazirinejad.doc.doc Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, (2008), 2(2): 1-6 B Vazirianzadeh et al: Side Effects of IGR… 1 Original Article Side Effects of IGR Cyromazine on Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a Parasitic Wasp of House Fly Pupae *B Vazirianzadeh 1, NAC Kidd 2, SA Moravvej 1 1Department of Mycoparasitology and Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Centre, Ahvaz Jundi Shapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran 2School of Biosciences, Cardiff University of Wales, Cardiff CF10 3TL, Wales, UK (Received 30 Nov 2008; accepted 12 May 2009) Abstract Background: Combination of cyromazine as an Insect Growth Regulator (IGR) and Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenop- tera: Pteromalidae) a parasitic wasp may be an effective tool for reducing the house-fly populations in poultry houses and livestock farms. This study was conducted to assess the side effects of the IGR cyromazine on the level of parasitism and numbers and the longevity of emerged N. vitripennis parasitoids from house fly pupae. Methods: Cyromazine treated cloth target was used as the contaminating method of the parasitoids which was ap- plied in this research study. Results: The Weibull distribution showed that there was no significant difference among controls and cyromazine treated targets for longevity data. There was no significant effect of cyromazine on the level of parasitism of N. vitripennis using χ2 test. One-way ANOVA showed that the actual numbers emerging were significantly higher in the control than in two cyromazine treatments; however, it is a useful phenomenon because of reducing the hyperparasitism. Conclusion: There is a good consistency between using N. vitripennis and 1.1% or 0.9% cyromazine treated targets. Therefore cyromazine treated targets can be applied as a safe delivery vehicle for applying the cyromazine IGR in the poultry houses and livestock farms in an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program. Keywords: Nasonia vitripennis, Cyromazine, IGR, Weibull distribution, Introduction Commercial poultry houses and livestock farms are rapidly expanding worldwide to meet the needs of the increasing human popula- tion (Axtell 1999). Therefore, the increase in accumulating manure is unavoidable. This phe- nomenon provides breeding places for differ- ent groups of pests, with house-flies being the most abundant species in poultry facilities and livestock farms. As a result, Musca domestica is the primary object of most fly management and control programs (Wilhoit et al. 1991). Chemical control methods, using differ- ent insecticides belonging to the chlorinated hydrocarbon, organophosphate, carbamate and pyrethroid groups, can provide a rapid and easy means of suppressing house-fly popula- tions and have become popular since the 1950s. The use of those insecticides, however, has created several problems including resistance to insecticides, environmental pollution and the creation of new pests. As a consequence, ex- tensive research has been carried out to find suitable alternatives, particularly ones, which can be incorporated into Integrated Pest Man- agement (IPM) programs (Senior 1998, Vazir- ianzadeh 2003). Combination of an insecticide and a para- sitic wasp is a very serious issue in the IPM *Corresponding author: Dr B Vazirianzadeh, Tel: +98 9163095110, Fax: +98 611 3332036, E-mail: babakvazir@ yahoo.co.uk Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, (2008), 2(2): 1-6 B Vazirianzadeh et al: Side Effects of IGR… 2 (Emden 1984, Zhao 2000, Wang 2008). They have also expressed that chemical control and biological control are two important strate- gies and key points for the success in an IPM program. Combination of cyromazine as an Insect Growth Regulator (IGR) and Nasonia vitripen- nis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) a parasitic wasp may be an effective tool for reducing the house-fly populations in poultry houses and livestock farms. However, the effective exploitation of natural enemies in IPM fly man- agement programs requires defining the com- patibility of parasitoids with insecticides in use (Scott et al. 1991). In addition, the parasi- toids are at the risk of direct and indirect con- tacts with the IGRs therefore the consistency between two agents is an essential figure. Con- sequently, it was also necessary to evaluate the potential detrimental effect of cyromazine on, or compatibility with, the important spe- cies of natural enemies, in this case one species of Pteromalid parasitoid. Those criteria have also been discussed by Ruberson et al. (1998), Haseeb et al. (2004), Desneux et al. (2007), Wang et al. (2008) and as direct ef- fects (acute effects) and indirect effects (chro- nic effects) of insecticides on biological con- trol agents, like mortality or parasitism rate, longevity, egg viability, consumption rate and behavior, respectively. The objectives of the current study were to assess the side effects of the IGR on the level of parasitism, numbers of emerged para- sitoids and the longevity of parasitoids after emergence. Material and Methods Cyromazine treated cloth target was used as the contaminating method of the parasitoids which was applied in this research study. IGR In this research one commercial formu- lation of cyromazine, Neporex® (2% w/w), was used. In this case 32% w/v sugar solution was used as a solvent. Insects Parasitoids N. vitripennis came from Wye College, UK, colonies. Originally N. vit- ripennis parasitoids were reared in Sarco- phaga sp. (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) pupae. In the present study, the parasitoids were reared in the constant environmental chambers (25°C, 65% RH and 12 h L: 12 h D) of Cardiff School of Biosciences using house-fly pupae in 2003. Moreover, the rearing was carried out using 1000 cm3 and 250 cm3 glass jars with propor- tion of 1 parasitoid/5 house-fly pupae. They were fed with 5% honey solution. House-fly pupae were taken from the "Chicken house" a wild strain originated from a Carefilly poultry house of Wales, UK as well. Experiments Two series of treatments were conducted. In the first, newly emerged parasitoids were exposed for 48 h in 1000 cm3 glass jars to targets containing either 1.1 or 0.9 g/100 ml in 32% sugar solution giving 0.02 mg a.i./cm2 and 0.016 mg a.i./cm2 respectively and for the control, 32% sugar treated targets only. This ensured that the parasitoids were exposed to the IGR. Then five females of N. vitripen- nis parasitoids (two-day-old) plus two males of N. vitripennis, taken from the 1000 cm3 glass jars, were placed in a 25 ml glass test tube with twenty-five one day-old house fly pupae (Morgan et al. 1989, Mann et al. 1990, Scott et al. 1991). Three replicates were car- ried out, each replicate containing ten test tubes. This means that each replicate contained fifty female adult parasitoids and 250 house-fly pu- pae. Some tiny holes were made around the middle of the test tubes for ventilation. Then 30 pieces (5×5 cm) of polyester cloths were dipped in the 1.1 g/100 ml and another 30 in 0.9 g/100 ml cyromazine solutions. Then the tops of test tubes were sealed with the treated clothes. After 48 h the pupae were replaced Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, (2008), 2(2): 1-6 B Vazirianzadeh et al: Side Effects of IGR… 3 with twenty-five fresh pupae, the numbers be- ing kept constant during the experiments. Then, a sample of ten pupae was collected from each test tube, placed individually in plastic Petri dishes (Geden et al. 1992) and kept for 3 weeks in the constant environmental room (25° C, 65% RH and 12 h L: 12 h D). The level of parasitism and the numbers of em- erged parasitoids were recorded. This proce- dure was carried out until all of parasitoids died. The cloths were treated with 1.1 g/100 ml and 0.9 g/ml of IGR in 32% w/v sugar solu- tion every 24 h. Three replicates were done with 32% w/v sugar-only treated cloths as controls. The second treatment was used to ex- amine the longevity of parasitoids under the IGR and control regimes. Fifty newly-emerged N. vitripennis (per replicate) were placed in- dividually in test tubes, to remove the effects of population density of population longevity and to determine accurately individual lon- gevity. The top of the test tubes were covered by cloths treated with either 1.1 or 0.9 g/ml cyromazine in 32% sugar solution or 32% sugar solution alone (control). Then 5 house-fly pu- pae (one-day-old) were put in each test tube. The house-fly pupae were replaced with fresh ones every 48 h. The cloths were treated with same concentration each 24 h. The number of dead parasitoids was recorded every 48 h. Three replicates per treatment were conducted. Data analysis Chi-squared tests were used to test the effects of the IGR on the level of parasitism. Where replicates were found to be homoge- neous (again using Chi-squared tests), the re- sults of each treatment were summed. To determine the effects of IGR on the numbers of emerged parasitoids, one-way ANOVA was used, after preliminary diagno- stic checks for normality of residuals (Ryan- Joiner test) and homogeneity of variances (Bar- tlett’s and F-tests). The Least Significant Dif- ference (LSD) method was used to detect any differences between treatments and controls, with Bonferroni corrections where necessary. To determine the longevity parameters of parasitoids, the Weibull distribution was used. It enables statistical comparison of the shape and scale of different survival curves, provid- ing valuable information which is lost if lon- gevity is summarized as a mean with standard deviation, or as a single LT50 value, as com- monly done (Pinder III et al. 1978, Tingle and Copland 1989). In addition, Minitab performs a series of Chi-squared tests and provides 95% confi- dence intervals for testing weather two or more samples have equal shape or scale and come from the same population. Also, testing wea- ther the distribution parameters are consistent with specified values (Manual of Minitab 13.1, 2000, University of Wales computing service, 2001 and communication with office of Mini- tab, 2001). As a result by means of the above mentioned procedures the longevity of parame- ters, scale and shape, were determined. As well LT50s were obtained from the table of per- centiles and used to compare the results of treatments. Results The results in Table 1 show that there was no significant effect of cyromazine on the level of parasitism of N. vitripennis (Mean percent- age parasitism, χ2= 0.46; P= 0.794; d.f= 2). One-way ANOVA (Table 1) showed that, while there was no differences in the level of parasitism between the treatments and con- trol (using Chi-squared tests), the actual num- bers emerging were significantly higher in the control than in two cyromazine treatments (P< 0.001). However, there was no difference between the 1.1% and 0.9% cyromazine treat- ments. The longevity results, as described by the Weibull distribution, are summarized in Ta- ble 2 (as an example of Weibull distribution). Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, (2008), 2(2): 1-6 B Vazirianzadeh et al: Side Effects of IGR… 4 All shape parameters of controls and IGR- treatments were significantly larger than 1 (P< 0.001), indicating that all of the lon- gevity curves belonged to the Type Ι shape category. Weibull results, using Chi-square tests for comparisons, showed that there was no significant different among controls and cyro- mazine treated targets for longevity data, shape parameters (P= 1), scale parameters (P= 1) and overall shape and scale. Those results ex- plain that cyromazine did not effect on the lon- gevity of N. vitripennis population. Compari- sons of LT50s for each treatment were also consistent with these results, showing no sig- nificant differences due to overlapping con- fidence intervals. Table 1. Effect of cyromazine on mean percentage parasitism of N. vitripennis (2-day olds) over 10-12 days, treated targets Treatments Mean number of emerged parasitoids SE Mean percentage parasitism SE 32% sugar solution only treated targets 1724.00 23.47 53.47 0.27 0.9% cy in 32% sugar solution treated targets 874.30 10.92 52.47 0.35 1.1% cy in 32% sugar solution treated targets 874 8.03 52.33 0.41 Comparison of all treatments One-way ANOVA*F (P, df error/df of replicate) χ2 (P, df) 986.04 (0.001, 6/2) 0.46 (0.79, 2) cy=cyromazine *LSD results showed that there was a highly significant difference between the sugar-only treated targets and both concentrations of cyromazine. However, there was no significant difference between the two concentrations of cyromazine. Table 2. Longevity of parasitoids (newly emerged females) as described by the Weibull distribution, using different concentrations of cyromazine treated targets Treatments Shape value SE of Shape Scale value SE of scale Mean value SE of mean LT50 value SE of LT50 Curve type r* df of r N1/control 1.868 0.267 9.028 0.511 8.016 0.474 7.420 0.374 І 0.992 3 N/0.9% cy2 1.872 0.260 8.975 0.498 7.986 0.461 7.380 0.371 І 0.993 3 N/1.1% cy3 1.878 0.253 8.887 0.481 7.889 0.443 7.311 0.365 І 0.994 3 All scale, mean and LT 50 values are in days, Size of population = 150 1 N. vitripennis, 2 0.9%cyromazine in 32% sugar solution, 3 1.1%cyromazine in 32% sugar solution, r* correlation coefficient Discussion According to Scott and Rutz (1988), Man- deville et al. (1990), Rutz and Scott (1990), Sco- tt et al. (1991), Floate (1998), Floate and Fox (1999) the use of different classes of insecticides, including IGRs, in animal houses has adverse effects on an ecologically and taxonomically di- verse group of insects, including both predators and parasitic wasps. Therefore, to apply inte- grated pest management effectively in poultry houses and livestock farms, using a combination of IGRs and parasitic wasps, it is important to assess the compatibility of the control agents. The results obtained in this study report the different effects of cyromazine on N. vitri- pennis. There were no harmful effects on the level of parasitism of N. vitripennis, using 1.1% Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, (2008), 2(2): 1-6 B Vazirianzadeh et al: Side Effects of IGR… 5 and 0.9% cyromazine treated targets, but those concentrations were highly significant in reduc- ing the number of N. vitripennis emerging per pupa from 6.45±0.1 in control to 3.33±0.03 and 3.34±0.04 in 1.1% and 0.9% cyromazine, re- spectively. It is possible, however, that this ef- fect could be construed as beneficial in re- ducing the rate of superparasitism in this spe- cies, although this reduction might affect the next generation of the parasitoid. Both concentrations of cyromazine caused the same effects on the number of emerged parasitoid, using target application. This phe- nomenon explains that the parasitoids could parasitize the treated pupae, normally. Presuma- bly, some of their eggs did not hatch or some of larvae died after emergence in the host puparia. Both effects have been reported as the properties of cyromazine. The same level of parasitism between two concentrations and controls explain that the rest of larvae of para- sitoids carried out the successfully parasitism. Results of the study of Wang et al. (2008) showed that using IGRs (Hexaflumuron, Chlor- fluazuron, Buprofezin and Fuxian) performed very low contact and residual toxicity, how- ever with exhibition chronic effects of oral tox- icity on longevity, fecundity and offspring em- ergence of Anagrus nilaparvatae (Hymenop- tera: Mymanidae), an egg parasitoid of the rice planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemip- tera: Delphacidae). In contrast to the IGRs using the convenience insecticides presented the highest contact and residual toxicity in the study of Wang et al. (2008). The results of study of Srinivasan and Am- alraj (2003) using a combination of parasitoid Dirhinus himalayanus (Hymenoptera: Chal- cididae) and insect growth regulator, triflumu- ron against house fly, Musca domestica (Dip- tera: Muscidae) show that it is effective in re- ducing puparia and fly density. Therefore, for su- stenance of an effective fly control program, com- bination a parasitoid and an IGR may be used. The Weibull results here show that 1.1% and 0.9% cyromazine did not affect the lon- gevity of N. vitripennis and there was no significant difference amongst the treatments and control. Consequently, there should be a good consistency between using N. vitripennis and 1.1% or 0.9% cyromazine treated targets. Then it is suggested using cyromazine treated tar- gets as a safe delivery vehicle for applying the cyromazine IGR in the poultry houses and livestock farms in an Integrated Pest Manage- ment (IPM) program. Acknowledgements Iran Ministry of Health who sponsored financially this study is appreciated. Thanks Mr. P. Macaughen of Computing Service, Car- diff University of Wales for providing Weibull distribution to interpret the longevity results. References Axtell RC (1999) Poultry integrated pest management: Status and future. Integr Pest Manag Rev. 4: 53–73. Desneux N, Decourtye A, Delpuech JM (2007) The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol. 52: 81-106. Emden HFV (1984) Pest control and its ecol- ogy. The Camelot Press, Southampton. Floate KD (1998) Off–target effects of iver- mectin on insects and on dung degra- dation in Southern Alberta, Canada. Bull Entomol Res. 88: 25-35. Floate KD, Fox AS (1999) Indirect effects of ivermectin residues across trophic levels: Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) and Muscidifurax raptor (Hymenop- tera: Pteromalidae). Bull Entomol Res. 89: 225–229. Geden CJ, Rutz DA, Miller RW, Steinkraus DC (1992) Suppression of house-flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on New York and Maryland dairies using releases of Mus- cidifurax raptor (Hymenoptera: Pteroma- Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, (2008), 2(2): 1-6 B Vazirianzadeh et al: Side Effects of IGR… 6 lidae) in an Integrated Management Pro- gram. Environ Entomol. 21: 1419–1426. Haseeb M, Liu TX, Jones WA (2004) Effects of selected insecticides on Cotesia plutel- lae, endoparasitoid of Plutella xylostella. BioControl. 49: 33–46. Mandeville JD, Mullens BA, Yu DS (1990) Impact of selected pesticides on field population dynamics of parasitic Hy- menoptera (Pteromalidae) in caged-layer poultry manure in Southern California, U.S.A. Med Vet Entomol. 4: 261-268. Mann JA, Stinner RE, Axtell RC (1990) Pa- rasitism of housefly (M. domestica) pu- pae by four species of Pteromalidae (Hy- menoptera): effects of host parasitoid den- sities and host distribution. Med Vet Ento- mol. 4: 235–243. Morgan PB, Hoyer H, Patterson RS (1989) Life history of Spalangia cameroni (Hy- menoptera: Pteromalidae), a microhymen- opteran pupal parasite of muscoid flies (Diptera:Muscidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc. 62: 381–386. Pinder III JE, Wiener JG, Smith MH (1978) The Weibull distribution: a new method of summarising survivorship data. Ecol. 59: 175–179. Ruberson JR, Nemoto H, Hirose Y (1998) Pesticides and conservation of natural enemies in pest management. In: Barbosa P (Ed): Conservation Biological Control. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 207–220. Rutz DA, Scott JG (1990) Susceptibility of muscoid fly parasitoids to insecticides used in dairy facilities. In: Rutz DA and Patterson RS (Eds): Biocontrol of Ar- thropods affecting Livestock and Poul- try. Westview, Boulder, pp. 247–263. Scott JG, Geden CJ, Rutz DA, Liu N (1991) Comparative toxicity of seven insecti- cides to immature stages of M. domes- tica (Diptera: Muscidae) and two of its important biological control agents, Mus- cidifurax raptor and Spalangia cameroni (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). J Econ Entomol. 84: 773–779. Scott JG, Rutz DA (1988) Comparative tox- icities of seven insecticides to house- flies (Diptera: Muscidae) and Urolepis rufipes (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). J Econ Entomol. 81: 804–807. Senior LJ (1998) Control the greenhouse white- fly, Trialeurodes vasporariom [PhD thesis]. Cardiff University, UK. Srinivasan R, Amalraj DD (2003) Efficacy of in- sect parasitoid Dirhinus himalayanus (Hy- menoptera: Chalcididae) and insect grow- th regulator, triflumuron against house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Indian J Med Res. 118: 158–166. Tingle CCD, Copland MJW (1989) Progeny production and adult longevity of the Me- alybug parasitoids Anagyrus pseudococci, Leptomastix dactylopii and Leptos- matidea abnormis (Hym.: Encyrtidae) in relation to temperature. Entomophaga. 34: 111–120. Vazirianzadeh B (2003) Integrated pest man- agement of houseflies, Musca domes- tica (Diptera: Muscidae), using a com- bination of cyromazine Insect Growth Re- gulator (IGR) and a pteromalid wasp, Nasonia vetripennis. [PhD thesis]. Car- diff University, UK. Wang HY, Yang Y, Su JY, Shen JL, Gao CF, Zhu YC (2008) Assessment of the impact of insecticides on Anagrus nila- parvatae (Hymenoptera: Mymanidae), an egg parasitoid of the rice planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delpha- cidae). Crop Prot. 27: 514–522. Wilhoit LR, Stinner RE, Axtell RC (1991). Com- puter simulation of house fly management in confined-animal production systems. NC Agric Res Ser Tech Bull. 296: 1–81. Zhao SH (2000) Plant Chemical Protection. Chi- na Agricultural Press, Beijing. [in Chinese]