J Arthropod-Borne Dis, March 2017, 11(1): 161–165 M Fatemi et al.: Assessing the Ovarian … 161 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 14, 2017 Short Communication Assessing the Ovarian Accessory Glands to Determine the Parity of Phlebotomus papatasi, Vector of Zoonotic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, under Laboratory Condition Mahboubeh Fatemi 1, Mohammad Reza Yaghoobi-Ershadi 1, Mehdi Mohebali 2, Zahra Saeidi 1, Arshad Veysi 1, *Ali Khamesipour 3, *Amir Ahmad Akhavan 1 1Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2Department of Medical Parasitology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 3Center for Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Received 26 May 2015; accepted 2 June 2015) Abstract Background: Zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) is a neglected tropical disease prevailed in many rural areas of 17 out of 31 provinces in Iran. The main vector of the disease is Phlebotomus papatasi and the causative agent is Leishmania major in ZCL foci of Iran. In the current study we investigated the validity of accessory glands secre- tions as an indicator to recognize parous from nulliparous Ph. papatasi females under laboratory conditions. Methods: Over 235 laboratory-reared females of Ph. papatasi were dissected in 6 groups including: newly emerged, one hour, one day, two days, and three days after blood feeding and also after oviposition under stereo microscope for their parity in 2014–2015. Results: Transparent glands were compatible with nulliparous only in newly emerged sand flies. In sand flies dis- sected after oviposition, accessory glands were rather large as a result of oviposition though they were transparent. Conclusion: The accessory glands secretions could not be as an indicator for distinguishing parous from nulliparous of Ph. papatasi females. Keywords: Phlebotomus papatasi, Accessory glands, Parous, Nulliparous, Parity Introduction Phlebotominae sand flies are the vectors of different kinds of leishmaniasis and papatasi fever in the world (Dejeux 1991). Different forms of leishmaniasis have been recorded from 98 countries and 350 million people are at risk of the disease worldwide (WHO 2010). Zoonotic cutaneous leishman- iasis (ZCL) is the most common form of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Annually around 20000 new cases of leishmaniasis are re- ported in Iran, which more than 80% of the cases are ZCL form (Shirzadi 2010). Rhom- bomys opimus (great gerbil) is the major res- ervoir host of the disease in central and north-east parts of Iran. Tatera indica and Meriones hurrianae are the main reservoirs of the disease in south-west and southeast parts of Iran respectively (Mohebali et al. 2004, Akhavan et al. 2010). Meriones liby- cus is also reported as the main reservoir of ZCL in some central and south parts of the country. Leishmania major is the causative agent of the disease in Iran (Yaghoobi-Er- shadi et al. 1996). Phlebotomus papatasi and Ph. caucasicus are proven vectors of the en- zootic cycle of L. major among gerbils and *Corresponding authors: Dr Amir Ahmad Akhavan, E-mail: aaakhavan@tums.ac.ir, Prof Ali Khamesipour, E-mail: ali.khamesipour@gmail.com J Arthropod-Borne Dis, March 2017, 11(1): 161–165 M Fatemi et al.: Assessing the Ovarian … 162 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 14, 2017 jirds but only Ph. papatasi is responsible for transmitting the disease to human (Yaghoobi- Ershadi et al. 1994). In the course of disease transmission by sand fly, only those flies have laid eggs once (parous), could transmit the disease. Thus, parous sand flies play a critical role in dis- ease spreading. The study of age composi- tion in phlebotominae sand flies should be a fundamental part for understanding the epi- demiology of the disease transmitted by them, particularly leishmaniasis. On the other hand, physiological age of phlebotomine sand flies is estimated by nulliparous and parous female recognition. Unlike mosquitoes ovariole charac- teristics in phlebotominae due to small size, are not useful method to determine physiological age (Lewis and Minter 1960, Lewis 1965). So far no method has been applicable for counting the number of dilatations in sand flies (Detinova 1962). Ovarian accessory glands in sand flies are relatively large and have been used as a practical method to determine parity in several sand fly species (Adler and The- odor 1935, Lewis and Minter 1960, Lewis 1970, Takaoka 1989) but this method is not applicable for distinguishing parous females in many other species (Lewis 1965, Scorza 1968, Ready et al. 1984, Takaoka 1989). At the current study the reliability of the ovarian accessory glands to distinguish par- ity of Ph. papatasi females was examined under laboratory conditions. Materials and Methods Sand flies were collected using aspirating tubes during the active seasons from rural districts of endemic areas of Esfahan Prov- ince, Iran in 2014–2015. Phlebotomus pa- patasi colony was reared at the sand fly in- sectary of Medical Entomology and Vector Control Department, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and the Esfahan Health Research Station. Phlebotomus papatasi sand flies were reared under laboratory conditions at 26±2 ˚C, 70– 80% relative humidity and 14: 10 h (L: D) photoperiod. A male and a blood-fed female were trans- ferred in to plaster-lined individual pot for oviposition (Killick-Kendrick and Killick- Kendrick 1991). From the 2nd generation, the mass-rearing technique was used (Modi and Tesh 1983). To prevent fungal contamination in rearing pots, autoclaved field soil and sea sand were added into the rearing pots. Larvae food was sprinkled after 50% eggs hatching. Larval diet is the most important factor for maintaining sand fly colony. Larvae food was prepared using the method described by Young et al. (1981) with some modifications. In brief, the larvae food consists of equal proportions of dried rabbit feces, rabbit chow and yeast. Rabbit feces and chow were ground by a grinder. A spoonful yeast dis- solved in distilled water, then added for each 120-gr powder, then enough amount of dis- tilled water added to make paste. After 2 days when fungi contamination disappeared, the mixture was spread in a thin layer inside a tray. It was allowed to dry in an upside down position. Then food was scraped from the trays and ground by a grinder. After about one week the larval food was ready to use. For checking the value of using accessory glands for distinguishing parous of Ph. papatasi females from nulliparous, over 235 laboratory- reared females of Ph. papatasi were dissected in 6 groups including: newly emerged, one hour, one day, two days and three days after blood feeding and also after oviposition un- der stereo microscope for its parity (Fig. 1). Prior to dissection, sand flies were immo- bilized in -20 ˚C freezer for 5 min. Each sand fly was placed in a drop of sterile normal saline (9/1000) on a clean slide and dissected under a stereomicroscope. After releasing the ovaries and accessory glands, immediately they were examined under a stereomicroscope and light microscope to check the presence of granular secretions of the accessory glands. J Arthropod-Borne Dis, March 2017, 11(1): 161–165 M Fatemi et al.: Assessing the Ovarian … 163 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 14, 2017 Results A total of 235 Ph. papatasi females in- cluding 30 sand flies "newly emerged", 33 sand flies "one hour after blood feeding", 50 sand flies "one day after blood feeding", 38 sand flies "two days after blood feeding", 49 sand flies "three days after blood feeding and 35 sand flies "after oviposition" were dis- sected and compared regarding granular se- cretions (Table1). Granular secretions in the accessory glands were not observed in nulliparous females in newly emerged sand flies. In 17 out of 33 Ph. papatasi dissected one hour after blood feeding, granular secretions in the accessory glands were not observed in nulliparous females as well. In contrast, third, fourth and fifth groups of sand flies which were dissected one day after blood feeding, two days after blood feeding and three days after blood feeding showed discordant relation between granular secretions and parity. Discordant relation between granular secretions and parity was also found in 9 out of 35 of the sand flies after oviposition, although accessory glands were rather large as a result of oviposition. In 26 of 35 Ph. papatasi sand flies which had laid eggs granular secretions in the ac- cessory glands were observed (Fig. 2). Table 1. Observation on accessory glands of dissected Phlebotomus papatasi TotalAccessory glands secretionsGroups Present N (%)Absent N (%) ParousNulliparousParousNulliparous 30 33 50 38 49 35 235 - - - - - 26 (74.29) - 16 (48.5) 50 (100) 38 (100) 49 (100) - - - - - - 9 (25.71) 30 (100) 17 (51.5) - - - - Newly emerged One hour after blood feeding One day after blood feeding Two days after blood feeding Three days after blood feeding After oviposition Fig. 1. Different stages of abdominal physiology in Phlebotomus papatasi A) Newly emerged, B) One hour after blood feeding, C) One day after blood feeding, D) Two days after blood feeding, E) Three days after blood feeding, F) After oviposition Fig. 2. Accessory gland status of Phlebotomus papatasi in different stages of abdominal physiology. A) Newly emerged, B, C) One hour after blood feed- ing, D) One day after blood feeding, E) Two days after blood feeding, F) Three days after blood feed- ing, G, H) After oviposition J Arthropod-Borne Dis, March 2017, 11(1): 161–165 M Fatemi et al.: Assessing the Ovarian … 164 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 14, 2017 Discussion Accessory glands are convenient to deter- mine parity of Phlebotominae sand flies be- cause they are enough large to inspect fairly and quickly in contrast to ovarian but the re- sults of the current study and some others show that reliability of this method depends on sand fly species and it seems to be im- practical for all the sandflies. So all females with granular secretions cannot be consid- ered as parous, because some of the blood fed nulliparous females might have secreted granules shortly after blood feeding. Accessory glands secretions in Ph. cali- foniicus, Ph. stewarti and Ph. vexator from northern California and also in ten species from Kenya including Se. suberecta, Se. clydei, Se. garnhami, Se. ingrami, Se. harveyi, Se. schwetzi, Se. bedfordi, Se. antennata, Ph. mar- tini and Ph. guggisbergi are a useful method of parity (Lewis and Minter 1960, Chanitois and Anderson 1967) in contrast granular se- cretions were seen in both parus and nu- liparus females of Lu. cruciata, Lu. ovallesi, Lu. ylephiletrix, Lu. panamensis and Lu. shan- noni (Lewis 1965). Accessory glands of Lu. townsedi in Ven- ezuela showed discordant relation between granular secretions and parity as well (Scorza et al. 1968). Lewis (1970) reported that accessory glands secretions are a good indicator in eight species such as Lu. antunesi, Lu. flaviscutellata, Lu. ubiquilalis, Lu. aragaoi, Lu. rorotaensis, Lu. infraspinosa, Lu. tuberculata and Lu. saulen- sis although with small errors. In all dissected females of Lu. gomezi and Lu. shannoni accessory glands secretions were seen. As a result, accessory glands are not useful for distinguishing parity (Hashiguchi 1987). Takaoka et al. (1989) reported that acces- sory glands are a reliable sign of parity in females of Lu. ayacuchensis. But they are not suitable in six species including Lu. trapidoi, Lu. hartmanni, Lu. carrerai, Lu. thula, Lu. panamensis, Lu. shannoni and Lu. gomezi. The results of above studies show that the validity of accessory glands secretions as an indicator to recognize parous from nullip- arous depends on the species of sand flies. According to the results of the current study, accessory gland secretions are not good marker for determining parus from nullip- arous females of Ph. papatasi. Conclusion This study obviously demonstrates that mi- croscopic test of the accessory gland secre- tions is not reliable method for determining parus from nulliparous females of Ph. papa- tasi therefore a new method should be intro- duced to recognize parity status of this species. Acknowledgements This study was supported by Research deputy of Tehran University of Medical Sci- ences, Project No. 26140-27-03-93. We are grateful to Ms Gholampour, School of Pub- lic Health, TUMS, for their excellent assis- tance in sand fly rearing. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests. References Adler S, Theodor O (1935) I Investigations on Mediterranean Kala Azar. Viii.-- further Observations on Mediterranean Sandflies, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 116(801): 505–515. Akhavan AA, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Khame- sipour A, Mirhendi H, Alimohammadian MH, Rassi Y, Arandian MH, Jafari R, Abdoli H, Shareghi N, Ghanei M, Jalali- zand N (2010) Dynamics of Leishmania infection rates in Rhombomys opimus (Rodentia: Gerbillinae) population of an J Arthropod-Borne Dis, March 2017, 11(1): 161–165 M Fatemi et al.: Assessing the Ovarian … 165 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: March 14, 2017 endemic focus of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 103(2): 84–89. Chaniotis BN, Anderson JA (1967) Age struc- ture, population dynamics and vector potential of Phlebotomus in North Cal- ifornia. Part I: Distinguishing parous from nuliparous flies. J Med Entomol. 4: 251–254. Dejeux P (1991) Information on the epide- miology and control of the leishmania- sis, by country or territory. World Health Organ, Geneva. Detinova TS (1962) Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance. Wld Hlth Org. 47: 216. Hashiguchi Y (1987) Studies on New world leishmaniasis and its transmission, with particular reference to Ecuador, Kyowa printing and Ltd, Kochi. 174. Killick-Kendrick M, Killick-Kendrick R (1991) The initial establishment of sand fly colonies. Parassitologia. 33: 313–320. Lewis DJ (1965) Internal structural features of some central American phlebotom- ine sandflies. Ann Trop Med Parasit. 54: 351–365. Lewis DJ, Lainson R, Shaw JJ (1970) De- termination of parous rates in Phlebotom- ine sandflies with special reference to Amazonian species. Bull Entomol Res. 60: 209–219. Lewis DJ, Minter DM (1960) Internal structural changes in some African Phlebotominae. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 54: 351–365. Modi GB, Tesh RB (1983) A simple tech- nique for mass rearing Lutzomyia Long- ipalpis and Phlebotomus papatasi (Dip- tera: Psychodidae) in the laboratory. J Med Entomol. 20: 568–569. Mohebali M, Javadian E, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA, Hajjaran H, Abaei MR, (2004) Charactrization of leish- mania infection in rodents from en- demic areas of Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 10: 591–599. Ready PD, Lainson R, Wilkes TJ, Killick- Kendrick R (1984) On the accuracy of age-grading neotropical phlebotomines by counting follicular dilatations: first laboratory experiments, using colonies of Lutzomyia flaviscutellata (Mangabei- ra) and L. furcata (Mangabeira) (Dip- tera: Psychodidae). Bull Entomol Res. 74: 641–646. Scorza JV, Ortiz I, Gomez I (1968) Obser- vationes biologicas sobre algunos fleboto- mos de Rancho Grande (Venezuela). Acta Boil Venez. 6: 52–65 (In Spanish). Shirzadi M (2010) Guideline for control of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Department of Zoonosis, CDC, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran. Takaoka H, Gomez E, Alexander J, Hashigu- chi Y (1989) Observations on the validity of the ovarian accessory glands of seven ecuadorian sand fly species (Diptera: Psy- chodidae) in determining their parity. Ja- pan J Trop Med Hyg. 17(2): 149–155. WHO (2010) Control of the leishmaniases: report of a meeting of the WHO Expert Commitee on the Control of Leish- maniases, Geneva, 22–26 March 2010. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E, Tahvil- dare-Bidruni Gh (1994) The isolation of Leishmanha major from Phlebotomus (paraphleboyomus) caucasicus,in Isfahan Province, Islamic Republic of Iran. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 88: 518–519. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA, Mohe- bali M (1996) Meriones libycus and Rhombomys opimus (Rodentia: gerbilli- dae) are the main reservoir hosts in a new focus of zoonotic cutaneous leish- maniasis in Iran. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 90: 503–504. Young DG, Perkins PV, Endris RG (1981) A larval diet for rearing phlebotomine sand- flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Med En- tomol. 18(5): 446.