Microsoft Word - 1- Dr Vatandoost RTL.doc Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 1 Original Article Differential Responses of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) to Skin Emanations of a Man, a Cow, and a Guinea Pig in the Olfactometer S -M Omrani1, 2, *H Vatandoost1, MA Oshaghi1, F Shokri 3, MR Yaghoobi-Ershadi1, Y Rassi1, S Tirgari1 1Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health and National Institute for Health Research , Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2Department of Medical Parasitology, School of Medicine, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran 3Department of Pathobiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Received 27 Jan 2010; accepted 20 Feb 2010) Abstract Background: Biting habit of mosquitoes plays an important role in the epidemiology of mosquito-borne diseases. Mosquitoes use a set of elaborate sensory modalities to find their preferred hosts by exploiting cues emanating from a nearby host. It has been suggested that the chemical profile of skin can provide further support for anthropophilic mosquito species to find their suitable hosts. This study aimed at revealing the value of skin emanation for a zoo- philic species like Anopheles stephensi as a model. Methods: Skin emanations of a man, a cow and a Guinea pig were collected by ethanol soaked cottons. Upwind re- sponses of mosquitoes to 100 and 200 µl of filtered skin materials were non-competitively explored in a dual-choice olfactometer. L-lactic acid and other chemical content of the skin samples were identified by an enzymatic kit and GC-MS, respectively. Results: Unexpectedly, only human skin emanation was resulted in the statistically significant activation and attrac- tion responses of An. stephensi in the wind tunnel. L-lactic acid content of this skin sample was 10 and 29 times more than the cow and the Guinea pig, respectively. The possible role of lactic acid and a few other identified com- pounds have been discussed here. Conclusion: Anopheles stephensi showed higher and more specific upwind responses to human skin emanation in the olfactometer. Undoubtedly, the thorough explanation of this unexpected finding needs further investigation. But, if new data verify this result, then, it may be necessary to reconsider the role of skin emanation and thence the human blood index and vectorial capacity of this zoophilic mosquito. Keywords: Mosquito, Host preference, Host-seeking, An. stephensi, Skin emanation, Olfactometer Introduction Malaria remains a major public health problem in southern part of the country which comprises about 80% of all malaria cases in the country. In this part of the country six ano- pheline mosquitoes including An. culicifacies, An. stephensi, An. dthali, An. fluviatilis, An. superpictus, and An. pulcherrimus are known to be the malaria vectors (Zahirnia et al. 1998,Vatandoost, 2001, Zahirnia et al. 2001, Naddaf et al. 2003, Enayati et al. 2003, Va- tandoost and Moinvaziri, 2004, Vatandoost and Borhani 2004, Vatandoost et al. 2004, *Corresponding author: Prof Hassan Vatandoost, P.O. Box: 14155-6446, Iran, E-mail: hvatandoost@yahoo.com Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 2 Vatandoost et al. 2005a, 2005b, Hanafi-Bojad and Vatandoost 2006, Vatandoost et al. 2006a, 2006b, Oshaghi et al. 2006a, 2006b, 2006c, Davari et al. 2006, Abai et al. 2008, Vatan- doost et al. 2009. Anopheles sahacrovi and An. maculipennis are considered as malaria vector in northern part of the country (Salari Lak et al. 2002, Sedaghat et al. 2003a, 2003b, Sedaghat et al. 2005, Sedaghat and Harbach 2005, Oshagi et al. 2005, Doosti et al. 2006, Doosti et al 2007, Vatandoost and Zahir Nia 2010). Most of literature on the host-seeking behavior of mosquitoes is allocated to anthro- pophilic species. In an effort to understand more on the role of skin emanation in the host discrimination of zoophilic mosquitoes this study has been conducted on An. stephensi as a model. This mosquito species which is an important malaria vector in the Middle East and Indian subcontinent (Krishnan 1961, Ma- nouchehri et al. 1976) has a remarkable zoo- philic propensity (Kiszewski et al. 2004). Biting habit of mosquitoes in terms of host preference and frequency of taking blood meal plays a double role in vectorial capac- ity, a basic entomological concept in the epi- demiology of mosquito-borne diseases (Mc Donald 1957). Whereas the former is funda- mentally governed by mosquito genetics the latter is under the influence of environmental factors (Takken and Knols 1999). If a female mosquito has no primary problem with the availability and accessibility of the potential host, then she must locate it properly by ap- plying her elaborate sensory modalities (Bowen 1991). However, mosquitoes preferentially select their victims rather than bite in a random manner (Burkot 1988). It is suggested that in addition to other host cues, skin emanation provides further support in olfactory guidance of the female mosquito towards her preferred host (Price et al. 1979, Takken 1991, Braks et al. 1999, Clements 1999). Furthermore, it is proposed that the chemical profile of skin emanation also takes part in the intraspecific variation of the attractiveness of hosts to mos- quitoes (Knols et al. 1995, Brady et al. 1997, Qiu et al. 2006). Over 300 chemical compounds have been identified in human skin emanation (Sas- try et al. 1980, Bernier et al. 1999, Curran et al. 2005). It is well demonstrated that a few of these compounds are involved in mosquito- host interaction. L-lactic acid (hereafter called as lactic acid) (Acree et al. 1968, Geier and Boeckh 1999, Braks et al. 2001, Steib et al. 2001, Dekker et al. 2002), ammonia (Geier et al. 1999, Braks et al. 2001, Smallegange et al. 2005) and 1-octen-3-ol (Takken and Kline 1989) are among the most important ones. Electrophysiological and behavioral studies have also shown that a number of carboxylic acids individually or in a blend can be de- tected and attract mosquitoes in the presence of lactic acid and/or ammonia (Bosch et al. 2000, Smallegange et al. 2005, Smallegange et al. 2009). By contrast, a number of natu- rally occurring fatty acids on the skin of the human beings elicit negative electrophysiologi- cal and/or behavioral effects in mosquitoes (Skinner and Tong 1965, Bernier et al. 2007). Above all, whereas certain dose of a given chemical compound may elicit attraction, a lower or a higher dose may result in a repul- sive reaction or nothing at all (Smallegange et al. 2009). Therefore, it is conceivable that the odor-mediated attraction response of a phy- siologically-competent mosquito to a potential host is too far from simple. This study aimed at revealing the value of skin emanation for a zoophilic species like An. stephensi as a model. Materials and Methods Mosquitoes Anopheles stephensi originated from Iranshahr, Iran was maintained in the insec- tary of the School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran under 29±1° C, 80±5% RH, LD 12:12 h con- ditions. The stock culture of adults took their blood meals from a Guinea pig once a week. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 3 Eggs hatched in a water bowl and first instar larvae were distributed in water filled plastic trays (one per milliliter) on the next day. Elder instar larvae were fed with Tetramin® fish food. Daily collected pupae were placed in populations of 1000 to 1500 in 30×30×30 cm gauze-covered cages. The emerged adults accessed only to 10% glucose solution. All ex- periments were performed on 4-5-day-old 8- 10-h sugar deprived female mosquitoes dur- ing the middle third of the dark period. These mosquitoes were selected from their rearing cages by means of attracting to a small warm water filled bottle. They were put into five small cages in population of 10 and trans- ferred to the laboratory in an opaque plastic box matted with wet tissues. Olfactometer For this study a modified Giere et al. (1999) type dual-port olfactometer was used (Omrani et al., 2010). In brief, charcoal-fil- tered, humidified (50±2%) and warm air (27±0.1 and 29±0.1° C) was led via PVC pi- pelines to the olfactometer arms. Wind speed was constantly kept on 0.2 m/s at the cy- lindrical wind tunnel outlet. Light intensity of two 25 W incandescent bulbs reduced to 11 lux and scattered over the olfactometer from 80 cm height to provide a relatively homo- geneous ambient dim light in all experiments. Two white plastic sheets at the either side of the wind tunnel prevented undesirable optical stimulation of mosquitoes. Skin emanations In 3 consecutive days, a total of 90 skin emanation samples (10 sample per individual per day) were collected from a human being (43 yr old, male), a cow (Holstein, 3-4 yr old, female) and a Guinea Pig (4 mo old, female) by rubbing ethanol soaked (absolute, Merck, Germany) clean dental roll cottons (0.48±0.05 g) over different areas of around 6 square centi- meter during a 15 to 20 seconds period. Sam- pling was distributed all over the body to en- trap most of chemicals emanated from the skin. Then, alcohol wet cottons were squeezed sim- ply between fingers to extract trapped che- micals. They were pooled in the last day to get 15 to 20 ml semiturbid liquid from each speci- men. The experimenter used sterile surgical gloves throughout the procedure to prevent any contamination risk. Every day samples were transferred to the laboratory in an ice box to minimize loss of volatile compounds. The final specimens were filtered by number 2 Whatman filter paper and stored under -20° C till the time of behavioral bioassays or chemical analysis. Behavioral bioassays Skin emanations were tested noncom- petitively in two doses of 100 and 200 µl in four and eight replicates, respectively. Every four-replicate set supplemented with a trial of no stimulus at the start up as control. Tests were alternated between right and left arms to prevent the risk of systematic bias. For each trial a small cage containing 10 fresh mosquitoes was connected to the downwind end of the wind tunnel. After one to three minutes mosquito acclimatization a small filter paper (around 6 cm2) containing relevant dose of under test material was placed inside the stimulus chamber. 15 to 20 seconds slow shaking of this filter paper in the experimen- tal room was sufficient to evaporate alcohol solvent before it is inserted in the olfactome- ter. Then, mosquitoes were allowed to freely choose olfactometer arms during one minute experimentation time. At the end of each trial, mosquitoes were removed from the wind tunnel by an electrical vacuum cleaner. Through- out all experiments the experimenter used cotton gloves and carefully avoided touching the inner surfaces of the wind tunnel. Proportion of mosquitoes went out of the small release cage and the proportion visited or trapped in either arms of the olfactometer during one minute experimentation time com- prised activation (%) and attraction (%) to the either treatment or control arms, respectively. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 4 Chemical analysis of the skin emanation samples This procedure involved both enzy- matic measurement of lactic acid content and GC-MS analysis of the skin emanation spe- cimens. In the course of this study, two fur- ther samples from two generally similar cows and one sample of 0.001 dilution of technical DEET (98.8%) were supplemented to primary skin emanation samples for GC-MS analysis. Lactic acid content of each specimen was measured with the aid of an enzymatic kit (K-late, Megazyme, Ireland). This quanti- fication process involves two reaction steps in which the amount of NADH formed is cor- respondent with the amount of primary lactic acid. The NADH can be measured thereafter by the increase in light absorbance at 340 nm. For this procedure 100 µl of available speci- mens was tested and light absorbance was measured with a Diode Array Spectropho- tometer (Cecil, Model 1010, England). Chromatographic separation was per- formed using an Agilent Technologies 6890N Chromatograph equipped with HP-5 capillary column (5% phenyl 95% methyl poly siloxane) with 30 m length, 320 µm internal diameter and 1µm film thickness. The oven program started at 35° C for 3 min and ramped at 12° C/min to 180° C followed by 25° C/min to 270° C with a final hold time of 5 min. The gas chromatograph was operated at a constant flow of 1.3 ml/min of Helium as the carrier gas with 99.999% purity and the injection port and transfer line temperature was set at 230 and 270° C, respectively. The mass selective detector was Agilent 5973N which scanned a range from 35 to 350 m/z with 70 eV in EI mode. Chemical compounds were tentatively identified by comparison of the obtained mass spectrums with the internal library of the system. Statistical analysis Data entered in SPSS 13.0 statistical software and paired comparison of activation responses to each dual skin emanations per- formed by non parametric Mann-Whitney test (α= 0.05). The same statistical test was used for comparison of attraction responses of mos- quitoes between treatment and control arms or different quantities of test materials. Results Behavioral bioassays One hundred µl of any skin emana- tions did not significantly change the primary activation of An. stephensi in the olfacto- meter. However, when the amount of test material was doubled, the activation of mos- quitoes to human skin emanation increased significantly (Z= -2.386, P= 0.017) (Fig. 1). This increase was more than either no stimu- lus control situation or two other emanations. On the other hand, attraction to human skin emanation was statistically higher than Guinea Pig in both applied quantities (Z= -2.646, P= 0.008 and Z= -1.987, P= 0.047), but not for cow (Fig. 2). The differential attraction of An. stephensi was also significant between ol- factometer arms in both 100 (Z= -2.646, P= 0.008) and 200 µl (Z= -2.012, P= 0.044) doses. Lactic acid measurement Forty three, 4.4 and 1.5 µg lactic acid were detected in a 100 µl sample of human, cow and Guinea Pig skin emanations, respectively. GC-MS chemical analysis In general, 21, 30 and 34 chemical compounds were identified in human, cow and Guinea Pig skin emanations, respectively (Fig. 3, Table 1). Chromatograms revealed the presence of some more compounds. However, they were either unidentifiable by the avail- able chemical library or irrelevant for being extracted from a living thing. Ten compounds namely ethanoic acid, 2-ethyl hexanoic acid, butylated hydroxytoluene, dodecanoic acid, tetradecanoic acid, pentadecanoic acid, 9-he- xadecenoic acid, hexadecanoic acid, 9-octa- decenoic acid, octadecanoic acid were found Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 5 in all three specimens. While four further com- pounds i.e. 4-hydroxy-4-methylpentan-2-one; N, N-dibutyl-formamide; tetradecanoic acid, methyl ester and 9-octadecanamide were com- mon between cow and Guinea Pig, nonanoic acid and decanoic acid were identified in both human and Guinea Pig skin emanations. Hexadecanoic acid (45.21%), 4-hydroxy- 4-methylpentan-2-one (4.7%) and again this compound (22.56%) were the most relatively abundant chemicals found in the skin emana- tions of the human being, cow and Guinea pig, respectively (Table 2). Interestingly, a small quantity of N, N-diethyl-4-toluamide (0.12%) was identified in the cow skin emanation sample. Repeating the analysis of the same sample as well as two further samples from similar cows (data not shown here) and comparing these results with reconstructed chromatogram (Fig. 4) and mass spectrum of the 0.001 dilution of technical DEET (Fig. 5) verified that this re- pellent is present in the cow skin emanation. 200 microliter100 microliter0 microliter 110 100 90 80 70 60 M ea n A ct iv at io n (% ) Guinea Pig Cow Human Non Skin Emanation a b,c a a,c a,c a,c a,c Fig. 1. Activation response of Anopheles stephensi to 100 µl and 200 µl doses of various skin emanations in the olfactometer. Bars that share no letter above are significantly different at P< 0.05. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 6 Guinea PigCowHumanNon 30 20 10 0 -10 M ea n A tt ra ct io n (% ) Attraction to the control side (%) Attraction to the test side (%) a b a a,b a,b a a Guinea PigCowHumanNon 30 20 10 0 -10 M ea n A tt ra ct io n (% ) Attraction to the control side (%) Attraction to the test side (%) a b a a,b a,b a a Fig. 2. Attraction responses of Anopheles stephensi to different skin emanations in the olfactometer. (A) 100 µl (B) 200 µl. Bars that share no letter above are significantly different at P<0.05. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 7 (A) Human being 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000 3000000 3500000 4000000 4500000 Time--> Abundance TIC: OM1-2.D 3.93 12.70 14.65 15.78 17.27 17.42 18.63 19.18 19.68 19.78 21.07 21.22 (B) Cow 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000 450000 500000 550000 600000 650000 700000 Time--> Abundance TIC: OM3.D 3.86 8.55 12.65 15.34 15.77 17.27 17.42 18.62 18.85 19.17 19.67 19.76 21.07 21.21 21.51 (C) Guinea pig 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000 900000 1000000 Time--> Abundance TIC: OM2.D 3.91 8.55 12.65 15.34 17.27 17.42 18.63 18.82 19.17 19.67 19.76 21.07 21.21 21.51 Fig. 3. Reconstructed ion chromatogram from the electron ionization of compounds thermally desorbed from skin emanation samples on to a HP-5 capillary column. Labeled peaks correspond to those listed in table 1. (A) Human being (B) Cow (C) Guinea pig. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 8 Fig. 4. Reconstructed ion chromatogram from the electron ionization of the 0.001 dilution of technical DEET on to a HP-5 capillary column. (A) The mass spectrum of DEET from cow sample 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 m/z--> Abundance Scan 3919 (17.747 min): OM65.D 119 190 91 40 65 16251 17610577 207148133 253 281 (B) The mass spectrum of the 0.001 dilution of standard DEET 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 22000 m/z--> Abundance Scan 3924 (17.766 min): OM4.D 119 190 91 40 65 207 162176 281105 148135 267 32725378 341 Fig. 5. (A) Negative ion product mass spectrum of DEET observed from the sample of cow skin emanation. (B) Negative ion mass spectrum of the 0.001 dilution of the standard DEET in ethanol. 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 200000 220000 240000 260000 280000 300000 Time--> Abundance TIC: OM65.D 17.74 Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 9 Table 1. Chemical compounds identified by GC-MS analysis in the skin emanation specimens from a human, a cow and a Guinea pig. H= Human being, C= Cow, GP= Guinea pig. Compound Retention Time Skin Emanation Specimen Compound Retention Time Skin Emanation Specimen Ethanoic acid 3.93 H, C, GP 4-phenyl, 5-formyl, 1,2,3-H-triazole 17.37 GP Propanoic acid 5.6 C Dodecanoic acid 17.42 H, C, GP Benzeneacetic acid, alpha-oxo, methyl ester 6.4 C N,N-dibutyl thiourea 17.52 GP Benzenecarbothioic acid 6.46 GP Hexadecane 17.71 GP Benzeneacetonitrile, 2,5- difluoro 6.9 GP N,N-diethyl-4-toluamide 17.77 C Hexanal 7.79 C Tridecanoic acid 18.06 H Carbonic acid 8.26 H Heptadecane 18.31 GP 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-pentan-2-one 8.54 C, GP Hexadecane ,2,6,10,14 tetra methyl 18.35 GP 2-pentanone 8.57 H Tetradecanol 18.44 C 4-methoxy benzaldehyde,oxime 9.84 C Hexadecanal 18.46 GP 1-ethyl-phosphindoline 9.84 GP Tetradecanoic acid 18.64 H, C, GP 1,2,3-propanetriol 11.02 H Tetradecanoic acid methyl ester 18.82 C, GP 1-butanamine, N-butyl 11.28 GP Octadecane 18.85 GP Urea 12.2 H Nonadecane 18.85 C Cis-4-ethoxy methyl nitrostyrene 12.31 GP Eicosane 18.91 GP 2-ethyl hexanoic acid 12.72 H, C, GP Tetradecanoic acid,12 methyl 19.02 H Benzoic acid 13.35 GP 14-pentadecenoic acid 19.09 H 2,5-dimethylfuran 14.04 C 2-heptanone 19.14 C (1R,6S)-6-methyl-bicyclo-(4,2,0)-octa- 2-one 14.04 GP Pentadecanoic acid 19.18 H, C, GP Carbamothioic acid, butyl ethyl ester 14.33 GP 9-hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester 19.66 GP Nonanoic acid 14.65 H, GP 9-hexadecenoic acid 19.67 H, C, GP N,N-dibuthyl formamide 15.33 C, GP Hexadecanoic acid 19.78 H, C, GP 2,3-dimethyl-(1,4-pentadiene) 15.47 C Heptadecanoic acid 20.11 H Decanoic acid 15.77 H, GP 9-octadecenoic acid 21.07 H, C, GP Hexadecanoic acid, 2-propyl methyl ester 16.67 H Octadecanoic acid 21.22 H, C, GP 4-amino ,1-methyl uracil 16.81 GP 9-octadecenamide 21.5 C, GP Pyrimidine,4-fluoro2-dimethyl amino 16.81 C Furfuryl alcohol 21.63 C Phenol-(1,1-dimethyl ethyl), 4-methoxy 16.92 C 5-octadecane 21.63 GP 2-bromoethanol 17.15 C Squalene 22.39 C Butylated hydroxytoluene 17.27 H, C, GP 8-hydroxy-2-quinoline carboxyaldehyde 17.37 C Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 10 Table 2. Relative abundance of the indentified compounds by GC-MS analysis. Percentages are calculated by dividing the peak area of a compound by the total area of compounds identified in the same skin emanation sample. H = Human being, C = Cow, GP = Guinea Pig Compound Human (%) Cow (%) Guinea pig (%) Ethanoic acid 0.55 0.45 3.02 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone 0 4.70 22.56 2-ethyl hexanoic acid 0.44 0.25 1.16 Nonanoic acid 0.29 0 0.55 N,N dibuthyl formamide 0 0.45 1.39 Decanoic acid 0.17 0 0.59 Butylated hydroxytoluene 0.23 2.14 16.47 Dodecanoic acid 1.37 0.59 3.47 Tetradecanoic acid 11.38 1.23 3.11 Tetradecanoic acid, methyl ester 0 0.10 0.31 Pentadecanoic acid 10.26 0.17 1.06 9-hexadecenoic acid 11.89 0.45 1.37 Hexadecanoic acid 45.21 3.31 10.37 9-octadecenoic acid 0.09 0.43 1.62 Octadecanoic acid 6.33 0.45 1.22 9-Octadecenamide 0 0.38 1.61 Discussion This study illustrates non-competitive dominance of the human skin sample over cow or Guinea pig skin emanations in a dual- choice olfactometer for the zoophilic malaria mosquito An. stephensi. At first glance, this result appears to be against the hypothesis that the olfactory sig- nature of the skin of a preferred host pro- vides specific supportive signal to a host- searching female mosquito. However, a few points are needed to be taken into considera- tion, here. First of all, labeling a mosquito as a zoophilic or an anthropophilic species is primarily based on field studies and it is well known that such data is under the influence of environmental factors (Garrett-Jones et al. 1980). So, at times it is possible that an an- thropophilic mosquito feeds on a non-human host or a zoophilic mosquito bites a human being, on the contrary. On the other hand, there are a few evidences that a highly zoophilic mosquito species may show degrees of an- thropophily under controlled conditions. For example, An. quadriannulatus and An. ste- phensi were attracted equally to human and cow odor in a dual-choice olfactometer (Pates et al. 2001, Waka et al. 2006). The former species also showed unexpected anthropo- phagy under semi-field conditions (Pates et al. 2001). Collection of the skin emanations from individuals of a population with extreme at- tractive potential, inadequacy and insufficiency of skin sampling and/or the chemical analy- sis procedure, and above all, ignoring the in- dispensable role of other host cues are other sources of the misinterpretation of the current result. None the less, the chemical profile of tested emanations might still provide some useful clues on the observed selective attrac- tiveness of An. stephensi in this study. The increased upwind activity of mosquitoes in re- sponse to doubling the amount of skin mate- rials witnesses that this is a logic approach. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 11 The lactic acid content of the human skin emanation (43 µg) was measured to be around 10 and 29 times more than the cow (4.4 µg) and the Guinea pig (1.5 µg) sam- ples, respectively. This finding is similar to the result of the experiments of Dekker et al. (2002) who found that lactic acid content of human skin emanation was 15 times more than the cow specimen. They did not detect any lactic acid in skin samples of a rat or a rabbit, as well. By adding or removal of lac- tic acid to the cow or the human skin emana- tions they were able to demonstrate that the lower attraction responses of An. gambiae or Aedes aegypti in the olfactometer were mainly due to the specific level of lactic acid concentration in these skin samples (Steib et al. 2001, Dekker et al. 2002). Based on these evidences it is likely that the higher attrac- tive responses of An. stephensi to human skin emanation in the olfactometer might be related to the higher lactic acid content of this specimen. Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry revealed that there is very little amount of DEET in the cow skin ema- nation. Because DEET is a synthetic material (Acree and Beroza 1962) it is obvious that this chemical compound is exogenous, but we were not able to determine the source of this contamination. Whereas some workers have reported that the DEET is an effective spatial repellent (Wirtz et al. 1980, Hoffman and Miller 2002), others have considered that it is a weak one (Mc Govern et al. 1967, Bernier et al. 2005). It has been explained that in the latter situations the concentration of this material in the vapor phase had been very low (Bernier et al. 2007). According to these evidences, it is suggested that whatever the source of DEET in the cow skin sample it can not justify well the inferiority of this skin emanation for An. stephensi in the ol- factometer. Ethanoic acid, a short-chain aliphatic car- boxylic acid was identified in all three skin samples. Electrophysiological recordings from sensilla trichodea of the zoophilic species An. quadriannulatus and An. atroparvus have shown that the responses of the housed sen- sory neurons are inhibitory (Van den Broek and den Otter 1999). Therefore, the lower activation and attraction responses of An. stephensi to Guinea pig skin emanation in the wind tunnel may has some correlation with higher relative abundance of this chemical com- pound in this sample. Nonanoic, decanoic and dodecanoic acid are three other carboxylic acids which have been reported to repel anthropophilic mos- quito species individually at certain doses (Rei- fenrath 2005). Despite of the lower relative abundance of these fatty acids, their com- parative level in each skin emanation sample and/or their combination with other chemical compounds therein might have particular con- tribution in the observed upwind responses of An. stephensi in the olfactometer. Tetradecanoic acid was also common in all tested skin emanations. There are con- tradictory reports on the effect of this carbox- ylic acid on the upwind responses of mos- quitoes. While this fatty acid alone or in com- bination with lactic acid and ammonia were attractive for Culex quinquefasciatus and An. gambiae, respectively (Cork and Park 1996, Smallegange et al. 2009), its addition to the blend of lactic acid plus a set of other car- boxylic acids decreased attraction responses of Ae. aegypti in the wind tunnel (Bosch et al. 2000). If tetradecanoic acid assumed an attractive agent, then, it can be mentioned in line with lactic acid to explain the higher at- tractive responses of An. stephensi to human skin emanation. But, if it is considered as an attraction inhibitor, since its relative abundance in the human skin sample (11.38%) was 10 times more than in the cow skin emanation (1.23%), it may provide further support that the very small quantity of identified DEET can not justify inferior responses of An. ste- phensi to this skin sample. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 12 Although hexadecanoic acid was the most relatively abundant chemical compound found in the human skin emanation (45.21%), there is no evidence that it can play a role in at- tractive responses of mosquitoes (Knols and Meijerink 1997, Bosch et al. 2000, Puri et al. 2006). The relative abundance of butylated hydroxytoluene was much higher in the Guinea pig (16.47%) than the human (0.23%) or the cow (2.14%) skin emanations. This chemical agent which is a synthetic antioxidant is com- monly used in the preservation of food ma- terials (Koltover 2009). Although, the fre- quent consumption of nutritional supplements may explain the origin and higher relative abun- dance of butylated hydroxytoluene in the skin emanation of the Guinea pig, it is not know whether it could take any part in the ob- served responses of An. stephensi in the ol- factometer. 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-pentan-2-one is a ketonic material which was found with a high relative abundance in the skin emana- tion of Guinea pig (22.56%). It was not de- tected in the human skin sample. This chemical compound is derived from 2-pentanone which is reported to be attractive for Ae. aegypti (Bernier et al. 2004). However, we do not know the effect of 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-pentan- 2-one on mosquitoes. In conclusion, although it is likely that the dominance of human skin emanation for An. stephensi in the olfactometer results from the higher content of lactic acid and con- tribution of a few carboxylic acids, more in- vestigation is needed to make a reasonable judgment on the role of skin emanations in host-seeking behavior of this zoophilic mos- quito. However, if semi-field and field data verify the unexpected findings of this study, it will be necessary to rethink on the current values of human blood index and vectorial capacity for this malaria mosquito species. Acknowledgements This article is a part of the results of the first author’s dissertation for fulfillment of a Ph.D. degree in Medical Entomology and Vector Control from Department of Me- dical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Me- dical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The authors are grateful to Dr. Seyed Mahmood Reza Nik- bakhtzadeh, Department of Parasitology and Medical Entomology, Tarbiat Modarres Uni- versity, Tehran, Iran, Dr. Ali Mehdinia and Mrs. Sahar Farzadnia, National Institute of Oceanology, Tehran, Iran for their kind con- tribution in GC-MS analysis of the skin ema- nation samples. We also thank Mrs. Fatemeh Mohtarami, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran for her supervision on the meticulous meas- urement of the lactic acid content of the skin emanation samples. This study was financially supported by School of Public Health, Aca- demic Pivot for Education and Research, Te- hran University of Medical Sciences, project No. 85-01-63-3687. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. References Abai MR, Mehravaran A, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Javadian E, Mashayekhi M, et al. (2008) Comparative performance of imagicides on Anopheles stephensi, main malaria vector in a malarious area, southern Iran. J Vector Borne Dis. 45(4): 307–312. Acree F, Turner RB, Gouck HK, Beroza M, Smith N (1968) L-Lactic acid: a mos- quito attractant isolated from humans. Science. 161: 1346–1347. Acree FJ, Beroza M (1962) Quantiative gas chromatography of isomers of insect re- pellent N, N-diethyltoluamide. J Econ En- tomol. 55: 619–622. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 13 Bernier UR, Booth MM, Yost RA (1999) Analysis of human skin emanations by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. 1. Thermal desorption of attractants for the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti) from handled glass beads. Anal Chem. 71: 1–7. Bernier UR, Kline DL, Posey HP (2007) Hu- man emanations and related natural com- pounds that inhibit mosquito host finding abilities In: Debboun M, Frances SP and Strickman D (eds.), Insect Repellents: Principles, Methods and Uses. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, New York. pp. 77–100. Bernier UR, Furman KD, Kline DL, Allan SA (2005) Comparison of contact and spatial repellency of catnip oil and N, N- di- ethyl-3-methylbenzamide (Deet) against mosquitoes. J Med Entomol. 42: 306–311. Bernier UR, Barnard DR, Booth MM, Kline DL, Posey KH, et al. (2004) Chemical composition that attract arthropods, US Patent 6,800,279 B2 October 4 2004. Bosch OJ, Geier M, Boeckh J (2000) Con- tribution of fatty acids to olfactory host finding of female Aedes aegypti. Chem Senses. 25: 323–330. Bowen MF (1991) The sensory physiology of host-seeking behaviour in mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol. 36: 139–158. Brady J, Costantini C, Sagnon N, Gibson G, Coluzzi M (1997) The role of body odours in the relative attractiveness of different men to malarial vectors in Burkina Faso. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 91: S121–S122. Braks MAH, Anderson RA, Knols BGJ (1999) Infochemicals in mosquito host selection: Human skin micrflora and Plasmodium parasites. Parasitol Today. 15: 409–513. Braks MAH, Meijerink J, Takken W (2001) The response of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, to two components of human sweat, ammonia and L-lactic acid, in an olfactometer. Physiol Entomol. 26: 142–148. Burkot TR (1988) Non-random host selec- tion by Anopheline mosquitoes. Parasitol Today. 4: 156–162. Clements AN (1999) The biology of mosqui- toes. Vol. 2. CABI Publishing, New York. Cornel University. pp 130. Cork A, Park KC (1996) Identification of electrophysiologically-active compounds for the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gam- biae, in human sweat extracts. Med Vet Entomol. 10: 269–276. Curran AM, Rabin SI, Prada PA, Furton KG (2005) Comparison of the volatile organic compounds present in human odor using SPME-GC/MS. J Chem Ecol. 31: 1607– 1619. Davari B, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Ladonni H, Enayati AA, Shaeghi M et al. (2007). Selection of Anopheles stephensi with DDT and dieldrin and cross- resis- tance spectrum to pyrethroids and fipronil. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 89(2): 97-103 Dekker T, Steib B, Carde RT, Geier M (2002) L-Lactic acid: a human-signifying host cue for the anthropophilic mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Med Vet Entomol. 16: 91–98. Doosti S, Azari-Hamidian S, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Hosseini M (2006) Taxo- nomic differentiation of Anopheles sacha- rovi and An.maculipennis S.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae by seta 2 (antepalmate hair). Acta Medica Iranica. 44(1): 21–27. Doosti S, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Hosseini M, Sedaghat MM (2007). Applying Mor- phometric Variation of Seta 2 (Antepal- mate Hair) among the Larvae of the Mem- bers of the Maculipennis Sub-group (Dip- tera: Culicidae) in Iran. Iran J Arthropod- Borne Dis. 1(1): 28-37 Enayati AA, Vatandoost H, Ladonni H, Townson H, Hemingway J 2003) Mo- lecular evidence for a Kdr-like pyrethroid resistance mechanism in the malaria vec- tor mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Med Vet Entomol. 17(2): 138–144. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 14 Garrett-Jones C, Boreham PFL, Pant CP (1980) Feeding habits of Anophelines (Dip- tera: Culicidae) in 1971–1978, with refer- ence to the human blood index: a review. Bull Entomol Res. 70: 165–185. Geier M, Boeckh J (1999) A new Y-tube ol- factometer for mosquitoes to measure the attractiveness of host odours. Entomol Exp Appl. 92: 9–19. Geier M, Bosch OJ, Boeckh J (1999) Am- monia as an attractive component of host odour for the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Chem Senses. 24: 647–653. Hanafi-Bojd AA, Vatandoost H, Jafari R (2006) Susceptibility status of An. dthali and An. fluviatilis to commonly used lar- vicides in an endemic focus of malaria, south- ern Iran. J Vector Borne Dis. 43: 34–38. Hoffman EJ, Miller JR (2002) Reduction of mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) attacks on a human subject by combination of wind and vapor-phase deet repellent. J Med En- tomol. 39: 935–938. Kiszewski A, Mellinger A, Spielman A, Ma- laney P, Sachs SE, Sachs J (2004) A global index representing the stability of malaria transmission. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70: 486–498. Knols BGJ, Meijerink J (1997) Odors influence mosquito behavior. Sci Med. 4: 56–63. Knols BGJ, de Jong R, Takken W (1995) Differential attractiveness of isolated hu- mans to mosquitoes in Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 89: 604–606. Koltover VK (2009) Bioantioxidants: the sys- tems reliability standpoint. Toxicol Ind Health. 25: 295–299. Krishnan KS (1961) Vectors of malaria in India. National Society of India for Malaria and Other Mosquito-borne Disease, Delhi. 27–37. Manouchehri AV, Javadian E, Eshghi N, Motabar M (1976) Ecology of Anopheles stephensi Liston in southern Iran. Trop Geogr Med. 28: 228–232. Mc Donald G (1958) The epidemiology and control of malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 7(5): 577–578 Mc Govern TP, Beroza M, Gouck HK (1967) Chemicals tested as space repellents against yellow-fever mosquitoes, II. Carbanilates, benzamides, aliphatic amides, and imides. J Econ Entomol. 60: 1591–1594. Naddaf SR, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Asmar M (2003) Molecular characteriza- tion of the Anopheles fluviatilis species complex in Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 9(3): 257–265. Omrani, SM, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Shokri F, Guerin PM, Yaaghoobi-Ershadi MR et al (2010) Fabrication of an olfac- tometer for mosquito behavioural studies. J Vector Borne Dis. 47: 17–25. Pates HV, Takken W, Curtis CF, Huisman PWT, Akinpelu O, Gill GS (2001) Unex- pected anthropophagic behaviour in Ano- pheles quadriannulatus. Med Vet Ento- mol. 15: 293–298. Price GD, Smith N, Carlson DA (1979) The attraction of female mosquitoes (Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say) to stored human emanations in conjunction with adjusted levels of relative humidity, temperature, and carbon dioxide. J Chem Ecol. 5: 383–395. Puri SN, Mendki MJ, Sukumaran D, Gane- san K, Prakash S, Sekhar K (2006) Elec- troantennogram and behavioral responses of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culici- dae) females to chemicals found in human skin emanations. J Med Entomol. 43: 207– 213. Oshaghi MA, Chavshin AR, Vatandoost H, Yaaghoobi F, Mohtarami, F, Noorjah N (2006a) Effects of postingestion and phy- sical conditions on PCR amplification of host blood meal DNA in mosquitoes. Exp Parasitol. 112: 232–236. Oshaghi MA, Chavshin AR, Vatandoost H (2006b) Analysis of mosquito bloodmeals using RFLP markers. Exp Parasitol. 114(4): 259–264. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 15 Oshaghi MA, Yaghoobi F, Vatandoost H, Abai MR Akbar Zadeh K (2006c) Anopheles stephensi biological forms, geographical distribution, and malaria transmission in malarious regions in Iran. Pak J Biol Sci. 9(2): 294–298. Qiu YT, Smallegange RC, van Loon JJA, Ter Braak CJF, Takken W (2006) Inter- individual variation in the attractiveness of human odours to the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae s. s. Med Vet Entomol. 20: 280–287. Reifenrath WG (2005) Natural insect repel- lent. In: Office USPaT (ed.), Washington D.C., U.S. pp 134. Sastry SD, Buck KT, Janak J, Dressler M, Preti G (1980) Volatiles emitted by hu- mans In: Wiley J (ed.), Biochemical appli- cations of mass spectrometry. Interscience, New York. pp. 1085–1129. Sedaghat MM, Linton Y-M, Nicolescu G, Smith L, Koliopoulos G, Zounos AK et al (2003a). Morphological and molecular characterization of Anopheles (Anopheles) sacharovi Favre, a primary vector of ma- laria in the Middle East. Systematic Ento- mol. 28: 241–256. Sedaghat MM, Linton Y-M, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H,Harbach RE et al. (2003b) The Anopheles maculipennis complex (Dip- tera: Culicidae) in Iran: molecular charac- terisation and recognition of a new species. Bull Entomol Res. 93: 527–535. Sedaghat MM, Harbach RE (2005) An anno- tated checklist of the Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran. J Vector Ecol. 30: 272–276. Salari Lak SH, Vatandoost H, Entezarmahdi MR, Ashraf H, Abai MR, Nazari M (2002) Monitoring of insecticide resistance in Ano- pheles sacharovi (Favre, 1903) in border- line of Iran, Armenia, Naxcivan and Turkey, 2001. Iran J Pub Health. 31(3-4): 96-99. Skinner WA, Tong H (1965) Repellency of skin-surface lipids of humans to mosqui- toes. Science. 149: 395–306. Smallegange RC, Qiu YT, Van Loon JA, Tak- ken W (2005) Synergism between am- monia, lactic acid and carboxylic acids as kiromones in the host-seeking behaviour of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gam- biae sensu stricto (Diptera: Culicidae). Chem Senses. 30: 145–152. Smallegange RC, Qiu YT, Bukovinszkine- Kiss G, Van Loon JJA, Takken W (2009) The effect of aliphatic carboxylic acids on olfaction-based host-seeking of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto. J Chem Ecol. 35: 933–943. Steib BM, Geier M, Boeckh J (2001) The ef- fect of lactic acid on odour-related host preference of yellow fever mosquitoes. Chem Senses. 26: 523–528. Takken W (1991) The role of olfaction in host-seeking of mosquitoes: a review. Insect Sci Applic. 12: 287–295. Takken W, Kline DL (1989) Carbon dioxide and 1-octen-3-ol as mosquito attractants. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc. 5: 311–316. Takken W and Knols BGJ (1999) Odor-me- diated behaviour of Afrotropical malaria mosquitos. Annu Rev Entomol. 44: 57-131. Van den Broek IVF, den Otter CJ (1999) Ol- factory sensitivities of mosquitoes with dif- ferent host preferences (Anopheles gam-biae s.s., An. arabiensis, An. quadriannulatus, An. m. atroparvus) to synthetic host odors. J Insect Physiol. 45: 1001–1010. Vatandoost H (2001) Irritability level of Ano- pheles sephensi in Iran. Iran J Public Health. 30 (1-4): 27-30. Vatandoost H, Moinvaziri VM (2004) Lar- vicidal activity of neem tree extract (Nee- marin) against mosquito larvae in the Is- lamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 10 (4): 573–578. Vatandoost H, Borhani N (2004) Suscep- tibility and Irritability levels of main ma- laria vectors to synthetic pyrethroids in the endemic areas of Iran. Acta Medica Iranica. 42(4): 240–247. Iranian J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2010, 4(1): 1–16 S -M Omrani et al.: Differential Responses of … 16 Vatandoost H, Shahi H, Abai MR, Hanafi- Bojd AA, Oshaghi MA, Zamani G (2004) Larval habitats of main malaria vectors in Hormozgan province and their susceptibil- ity to different larvicides. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Pub Hlth. 35: 22–25. Vatandoost H, Mashayekhi M, Abaie MR, Aflatoonian MR, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Sharifi I (2005a) Monitoring of insecticides re- sistance in main malaria vectors in a ma- larious area of Kahnooj district, Kerman province, southeastern Iran. J Vector Borne Dis. 42: 100–108. Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd AA (2005b) Cur- rent resistant status of Anopheles stephensi Liston to different larvicides in Hormozgan province, southeastern Iran. Pakistan J Bio Sci. 8: 1568–1570. Vatandoost H, Gholizadeh MR, Abai MR, Djavadian E (2006a) Laboratory efficacy of protection rate of torn nets treated with pyrethroids, cufluthrin, deltamethrin and permethrin against Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae). J Biol Sci. 6(2): 331– 336. Vatandoost H, Oshaghi M, Abaie MR, Shahi M, Yaghoobi F, Baghai M et al. (2006b) Bionomics of Anopheles stephensi Liston in the malarious area of Hormozgan pro- vince, southern Iran. Acta Trop. 97(2): 196–205. Vatandoost H, Ramin E, Rassi Y, Abai MR (2009) Stability and wash resistance of local made mosquito bednets and deter- gents treated with pyrethroids against Ano- pheles stephensi. Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis .3(1): 19–28. Vatandoost H, Zahir Nia AH (2010) Respon- siveness of Anopheles maculipennis to different imagicides during resurgent ma- laria. Asia Pac J Trop Med. 3(5):360–363. Waka M, Hopkins RJ, Glinwood R, Curtis CF (2006) The effect of repellents Ocimum forskolei and deet on the response of Anopheles stephensi to host odours. Med Vet Entomol. 20: 373–376. Wirtz RA, Turrentine JD, Rutledge LC (1980) Mosquito area repellents: laboratory testing of candidate materials against Aedes ae- gypti. Mosq News. 40: 432–439. Zahirnia AH, Taherkhani H Vatandoost H (2001) Observation of malaria sporozoite in Anopheles culicifacies (Diptera: Cu- licidae) in Ghasreghand district, Sistan & Baluchistan province. Hakim. 4(2):149–153. Zahirnia AH, Vatandoost H, Nateghpour M, Javadian E (1998) Insecticide resistance/ susceptibility monitoring in Anopheles pul- cherrimus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Ghasre- ghand district, Sistan and Baluchistan prov- ince, Iran. Hakim. 1: 97–106.