J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 286 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 Original Article Faunistic Study of the Aquatic Arthropods in a Tourism Area in Northern Iran Mansoureh Shaeghi 1, Hossein Dehghan 1, Kamran Pakdad 1, Fatemeh Nikpour 1, Azad Absavaran 1, Aioub Sofizadeh 1, Amir Ahmad Akhavan 1, *Hassan Vatandoost 1,2, Abbass Aghai-Afshar 1 1Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2Depertment of Environmental Chemical Pollutants and Pesticides, Institute for Environmental Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Received 8 March 2014; accepted 31 Dec 2016) Abstract Background: Aquatic insects are very abundant and divers groups of insects that are associated with an aquatic or semiaquatic environment in one or more of their life stages. These insects have been, in some cases, well studied because they are vectors of several diseases. This is the first comprehensive faunistic study of aquatic insects from Babol County. The results may provide basic data for further taxonomic and ecological studies of aquatic insects as biological control agent or classification of water quality for the country. Methods: The specimens were collected using different methods including: D-frame net collector, standard mos- quito dipper (350ml), Sweep-Netting and plastic pipette. Sampling carried out in different part of breading places in several times. Results: During this study a total of 196 aquatic specimens were collected from different habitats and were mor- phologically identified including 18 families classified in 6 orders: Diptera, Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Hemiptera and Odonata. Babol and Amol district in Mazandaran Province are located in humid climate regions with suitable ecological factors of humidity, moderate temperature and the variety of plant species. There are different species of aquatic insects in different habitats. Conclusion: The results will provide information for biodeveristy, species richness, their role for biological control as well as calcification of rivers based on abundance of aquatic insects. Therefore the understanding of ecological specifications of aquatic insects could provide a clue for further Arthropod-borne disease control. Additionally aquat- ic insect could be used for classification of water bodies Keywords: Aquatic insect, Iran, Mazandaran Introduction Aquatic insects are a very abundant and divers group that inhabits a variety of aquatic environments such as puddles, ponds, lakes, ditches, streams, lakes and other types of breeding places. Despite their importance in aquatic ecosystems, very few insects spend their entire lives submerged in water. Most aquatic insects undergo an aquatic immature stage followed by a terrestrial adult (eg Ephem- eroptera, Odonata, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Megaloptera). Even in cases where both the larvae and adult are aquatic, often the adult can exit the water and/or the pupal stage is terrestrial. Additionally, many species consid- ered are semiaquatic and are only associated with aquatic and semiaquatic vegetation, the water's surface, or the margins of water hab- itats (Bouchard 2004). Although only a small percentage (around 3%) of insects are aquatic, representatives are found in 13 insect orders (Daly 1984, Wil- liams and Feltmate 1992) suggesting that par- tial aquatic lifestyle might be advantageous to a wide array of insects. Generally, aquatic insects are nymphs/larvae of terrestrial adults (Brown 1987) that spend some time in ter- *Corresponding authors: Prof Hassan Vatandoost, Email: hvatandoost1@yahoo.com J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 287 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 restrial environments during certain stage/s of their life cycle (Jewett 1963). These insects have been, in some cases, well studied be- cause they are vectors of several diseases (Cook 1997), can be environmental quality biosensors (Kashian et al. 2007), and are uti- lized for understanding aquatic communities and ecosystems (Benke 1979, Waters 1979) and several other areas of ecology such as predator-prey interactions, competition, pop- ulation dynamics (Resh and Rosenberg 1984). According to the fossil record, aquatic in- sects appeared in the Triassic (Belayeva et al. 2002), more than 150 MY after the ap- pearance of insects (Gaunt and Miles 2002, Engel and Grimaldi 2004). This fact along with the presence of a tracheal system in nearly all aquatic insects (Chapman 1998), supports the idea that these animals secondarily adapted to living in water (Ross 1967, Resh and Solem 1984, Pritchard et al. 1993). Some species of aquatic insect are medi- cally important vectors that transmit diseases such as: malaria, dengue, filariasis, yellow fe- ver, anthrax, tularemia, and lyme (Foil 1998). Furthermore few numbers of them have a painful bite that cause dermatological effect on human and animal host (De Villiers 1987). Some of them act as a host of trematods such as: mayfly, dragonfly, damselfly and stone- fly (Chae et al. 2000) Aquatic insects may be used as water in- dicators of ecosystems as their life span, their comparatively stable mode of life and dis- tinct characters, offers as sorting and iden- tification of these organisms. Many authors have studied the water quality in with aquat- ic insects are used as indicator of pollution (Krishnamoorthi and Sarkar 1979, Gupta and Paliwal 2007, Agarwal et al. 2008). The var- ious species and population counts of aquatic insect larva present in a stream provide an effective way to monitor the health of the ecosystem. For example, stonefly (Plecop- tera) larvae are very sensitive to changes in water quality. On a scale from 0 to 10, with 10 being the most tolerant species, stonefly larva rank between 0 and 2 depending on the specific species (Hilsenhoff 1988). Some aquatic insects play important roles in mosquito control (James 1966, Ellis and Borden 1970, Pandian et al. 1979). In gen- eral, almost all aquatic insect predators prey on mosquito larvae and pupae (Ellis and Borden 1970, Peckarsky 1984), For instance diving beetle Rhanthus pulverulosus (Cole- optera, Dytiscidae) and aquatic instars of the order odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) are predators of mosquito larvae and have been observed to ingest mosquito larvae as a part of their natural food assemblages, in particular, may be useful for controlling mos- quito larval populations (Sunahara et al. 2002). The backswimmer, Notonecta undulate (He- miptera, Notonectidae) and giant water bug, Sphaerodema annulatum and S. rusticum (He- miptera: Belostomatidae), has been shown to efficiently utilize the second instar of mos- quito larvae as prey (Ellis and Borden 1970, Murdoch et al. 1984, Blaustein et al. 1995, Blaustein 1998, Pramanic and Raut 2003, Ad- itya et al. 2004, Aditya et al. 2005). The role of the backswimmer, Anisops assimilis, in controlling mosquitoes was recognized as early as 1939, when Graham (Graham 1939) noted some stock troughs with A. assimilis were free of mosquitoes, whereas puddles in depressions surrounding the troughs contained “energetic mosquito activity”. However, the predation efficiency of backswimmers on mos- quito larvae was found to be container-spe- cific (Lester and Pike 2003). Furthermore, the presence of backswimmers within a water body has been demonstrated to reduce ovi- position rates by adult mosquitoes (Chesson 1984, Blaustein et al. 1995). Limited numbers of studies have been car- ried out on the faunistic and ecological aspects of aquatic insects in Iran (Tirgari 1979, Hos- seinie 1978, Hosseinie 1992a, Hosseinie 1992b, Hosseinie 1994, Hosseinie 1995a, Hosseinie 1995b, Vafaei et al. 2007, Askari et al. 2009). J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 288 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 Babol County is a county of Mazandaran Prov- ince in north of Iran (36˚33′05″N 52˚40′44″E) and located approximately 20 kilometers south of Caspian Sea on the west bank of Babol Rud River and receives abundant annual rainfall. Due to the importance of aquatic in- sects there is an urgent need for comprehen- sive studies and publications that are locally available. The present study intends to help fill this gap by providing an overview of the literature published to date on the aquatic insects of Iran especially in Babol County. This is the first comprehensive faunistic study of aquatic insects from Babol County and may provide basic data for further taxonomic and ecological studies of aquatic insects in north of Iran. A further aim of this study was to consider the obtained faunistic results from the ecological aspect. Materials and Methods Study area A descriptive cross sectional study was performed in July 2012 in Babol County, Mazandaran Province. This province, located in the north of Iran and southern shores of the Caspian Sea (36° 33′ 56.16″ N, 53° 3′ 31.68″ E) (Fig. 1). Climatic characteristics of the Caspian Sea Coasts are almost Mediter- ranean. Generally its climate is temperate and humid and approximately is equilibrium with hot and cold throughout the year (heat and cold, 5 ˚C and 25 ˚C). Considering various fac- tors which influence the climate of the prov- ince are in the area, there are two types of weather: temperate plains and mountains (temperate and cold). In this study, rivers, rice fields, and the stagnant water in different parts of province were selected as sites for sampling and col- lecting of aquatic insects. Sampling methods The specimens were collected using differ- ent methods including: D frame net-collector, standard mosquito dipper (350ml), Sweep- Netting and plastic pipette. Sampling carried out in different part of breading places in several occasions. The samples were collect- ed, transferred to individual jars containing some water obtained from their habitat. Sub- sequently they were put in glass vials con- tained 70% ethylic alcohol. The date and location of sampling were written on the label and stick on the vials. All samples were sent to School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, where the author identified the specimens using the keys of aquatic insects based on Guide to Aquatic Invertebrate Families of Mongolia 2012 and other relevant systematic keys. In this study we used stereo-typed mi- croscope and microscope to identification of samples. The results were recorded on a data sheet based on the order and family and num- ber of its. All of the photos are original. Results During this study 196 aquatic insects (ma- ture and immature forms) were collected from different habitats (slow moving and turbu- lent rivers, shallow streams, temporary pond, andrice field that its information is shown in Table 1. Collected aquatic samples were identified by morphologic traits with using valid ento- mological keys (William Bouchard 2012, Subramanian and Sivaramankrishnan 2007). These aquatic insects after identifying represented 18 families belonged to 6 orders: Diptera, Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera, Plecop- tera, Hemiptera and Odonata (both sub orders Zygoptera and Anisoptera). Diptera with 5 families: Culicidae, Tipulidae, Chironomidae, Simulidae and Blephariceridae (Fig. 2A–E), Hemiptera with four families: Nepidae, Co- rixidae, Notonectidae and Gerridae (Fig. 3), Odonata with four families: Calepterygidae, Coenagrionidae, Lestidae and Aeshnidae (Fig. J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 289 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 4A, B), Ephemeroptera with three families: Baetidae, Heptagenidae and Caenidae (Fig. 5A–C), Plecoptera and Trichoptera with one family Taeniopterygidae and Helicopsychidae respectively (Fig. 6 and Fig. 7). In this study Diptera had the most and Trichoptera associ- ated with Plecoptera had the least families. From 196 identified aquatic insects 48 (24.5%) belonged to five families of Diptera, 39(19.9%) from Tricoptera, 37(18.88%) from 3 families of Ephemeroptera, 27 (13.77%) from Plecoptera, 25(12.75%) from 4 families of He- miptera and 20(10.2%) from 4 families of Odonata (Fig. 8). Helicopsychidae family and (Blepharicer- idae, Caenidae, Lestidae and Aeshnidae) al- located the most (19.9%) and the least (0.51) frequency of families in our study respec- tively (Table 3). Order Diptera We find five families in Diptera order which described in bellow: (Bouchard 2012) Culicidae Common Name: Mosquitoes Habitat: Mosquito larvae occur in standing or still water of lakes, ponds, marshes, temporary pools, and streams. The larvae are planktonic. Size: Small to medium (4–18mm) Characteristics: Head sclerotized, rounded, and clearly separate from the thorax, labrum with brushes of setae; mandibles moving against each other on a horizontal plane, tho- racic segments fused and swollen, wider than abdomen, Prolegs absent, eighth segment usu- ally bearing a respiratory siphon. Chironomidae Common Name: Non-Biting Midges Habitat: Chironomids are found in every aquat- ic habitat from small seeps to large rivers and from temporary pools to deep lakes. They occur in soft sediment, on rocks, in and around vegetation, in snags, and just about any other habitat. Size: Small to large (2–30mm) Characteristics: Head sclerotized, rounded, and clearly separate from the thorax, body elon- gate and worm-like, mandibles moving against each other on a horizontal plane, two pairs of ventral prologs (one on prothorax and one at the terminal end), prologs terminate in a series of hooks. Tipalidae Common Name: Crane Flies Habitat: Tipulid larvae can be found in a va- riety of habitats such as streams, ponds, and marshes. They can be found under rocks, in sand, snags, leaf packs, and algal mats. Size: Small to large (3–60mm) Characteristics: Much of rounded head cap- sule present or reduced to only a few rods, head capsule completely or partially retract- ed into thorax, mandibles moving against each other on a horizontal plane, usually with ventral welts, terminal segment usually with two spiracles, spiracular disc usually surround- ed by lobes or projections of varying num- bers or shapes. Blepharicerida Common Name: Net-Winged Midges Habitat: Blepharicerid larvae are restricted to cool, fast-flowing streams and waterfalls. They are found attached to rocks in areas of fast flow. Size: Small to medium (5–12mm) Characteristics: Head fused with thorax and first abdominal segment, mandibles moving against each other on a horizontal plane, 6 ab- dominal segments with deep constrictions be- tween segments, ventral suckers on first 6 seg- ments, gill tufts present ventrally. Simuliidae Common Name: Black Flies, Buffalo Gnats Habitat: Black fly larvae occur in streams and rivers in areas of moderate to fast current. They are found attached to rocks, logs, vegetation, or any other solid substrate in the current. J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 290 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 Size: Small to medium (3–15mm) Characteristics: Head sclerotized, rounded, and clearly separate from thorax, pair of labral fans (“mouthbrushes”) usually present, man- dibles moving against each other on a hori- zontal plane, proleg present ventrally on pro- thorax, posterior 1/3 of abdomen swollen, ab- domen terminates in a ring of hooks. Order Hemiptera Aquatic hemipterans are unlike most aquatic taxa in that the adults and larvae occupy the same habitat. Aquatic and semiaquatic Hemiptera can be separated into two groups based on their antennal morphology and the habitat in which they are generally found. Some Hemiptera are primarily aquatic and can be recognized by the possession of an- tennae that are shorter than the head and con- cealed below the eye. One exception is the Gelastocoridae, which are riparian and possess short antennae. The truly aquatic species are usually found under water, but many possess wings, which allow movement between water bodies. In contrast, most semiaquatic species of Hemiptera have antennae longer than their heads and can be found on the water’s sur- face or at the water’s margin. Although some taxa are primarily aquatic, most Hemiptera do not rely heavily on dis- solved oxygen in the water, but instead ob- tain oxygen from the atmosphere. We find four families in Hemiptera order which described in bellow: (Bouchard 2012) Corixidae Common Name: Water Boatmen Habitat: Corixids are found in areas of stand- ing or slow flowing water in ponds, lakes, marshes, streams, and rivers. Size: Small (3–11mm) Characteristics: Antennae shorter than head, concealed below eye, beak broad and trian- gular without distinct segments; fore tarsus scooplike and edged with setae. Nepidae Common Name: Water Scorpions Habitat: Nepids can be collected in ponds, marshes, and streams in areas of calm water. They are usually found at the vegetated mar- gins of these water bodies. Size: Medium to large (15–45mm) –not includ- ing respiratory tube. Characteristics: Body cylindrical or oval and flattened (not shown but when body is oval it is superficially similar to Belostomatidae), an- tennae shorter than head, concealed below eye, beak cylindrical, fore legs raptorial, mid and hind legs long and slender, abdomen ter- minating in an elongate breathing appendage. Gerridae Common Name: Water Striders Habitat: Gerrids are generally found on the surface of the water in ponds, lakes, marshes, streams, and rivers. Size: Small to medium (3–18mm) Characteristics: Body shape variable, anten- nae longer than head, beak cylindrical, claws of protarsus inserted before apex, metafemur extends well beyond tip of abdomen. Notonoctidae Common Name: Backswimmers Habitat: Notonectids most commonly occur along vegetated margins of lakes and ponds and in marshes. They are also sometimes found in the pools and backwaters in streams and rivers. Notonectids can also be found in tem- porary pools and ditches. Size: Small to medium (5–15mm) Characteristics: Body cylindrical, antennae shorter than head, concealed below eye, beak cylindrical, hind legs oar-like, hind tarsal claws inconspicuous Order Odonata We find four families in Odonata order which described in bellow: (Bouchard 2012) J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 291 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 Calopterygidae Common Name: Broad-Winged Damselflies Habitat: These damselflies are most common- ly found at the edges of streams with slow flowing water where they cling to root mass- es, overhanging grasses, and twigs. Size: Large (30–40mm) Characteristics: Antennal segment 1 longer than remaining antennal segments put together, pre- mentum with diamond shaped medial cleft, prementum and palpal setae absent, middle gill shorter than lateral gills, gills triangular in cross section, no veins visible in gills. Coenagrionidae Common Name: Narrow-Winged Damselflies Habitat: Narrow-winged damselflies are found in a wide range of habitats including ponds and flowing waters. These damselflies are most common in vegetation at the margins of lakes and in wetlands. Some species are found in streams clinging to rocks and vegetation. Size: Medium to large (15–32mm) Characteristics: Most are slender like other damselfly larvae (although some are short and stocky), all antennal segments are approximate- ly the same length, prementum triangular and stout without medial notch, usually 3–5 pre- mental setae on each side of midline, 1–7 rap- torial setae on each palpal lobe, palpal lobes terminating in 1–2 hooks, all gills the same length, veins in gills radiate diagonally from medial line. lestidae Common Name: Spread-Winged Damselflies Habitat: These damselflies are most common in small ponds, bogs, wetlands, and sometimes in slow weedy streams. Size: Large (22–38mm) Characteristics: These are long slender dam- selflies, all antennal segments similar, premen- tum with small triangular notch, prementum stalked and spoon shaped, 4–8 premental setae present, palpal lobes with 3–5 raptorial setae and trifid, all gills of similar length, veins visi- ble in gills and perpendicular to medial line. Aeshnidae Common Name: Darner Dragonflies Habitat: Darner dragonflies are most common- ly collected in vegetation along the edges of lakes and ponds. They can also be found in some streams under logs and stones or in snags. Size: Large (30–62mm) Characteristics: Prementum and palpal lobes are flattened, 6–7 antennal segments present with all segments of similar size and shape. Order Ephemeroptera We find three families in Ephemeroptera order which described in bellow: (Bouchard 2012) Baetidae Common Name: Primitive Minnow Mayflies Habitat: Primitive minnow mayflies can be found in vegetation along large rivers, in the riffles of small streams, in seeps, in swamps, and in ponds. Size: Small to large (6–20mm) Characteristics: Antennae less than 2x the width of head, maxillae without pectinate spines, gills usually present on abdominal segments 1–7, gills usually oval, long setae present on caudal filaments (present on both sides of terminal fila- ment and only on the inner side of the cerci). Heptageniidae Common Name: Flathead Mayflies Habitat: Flathead mayflies are most common in slow to fast flowing streams where they occur on the surface of rocks, logs, vegeta- tion, and leaves. HEMEROPTERA Size: Small to large (5–20mm) Characteristics: Body, head, and legs (femora) flattened, mouthparts not visible from dorsal view, gills present on abdominal segments 1–7, only short setae present on caudal filaments. Caenidae Common Name: Small Square-Gill Mayflies Habitat: Caenid may fly larvae occur in streams in areas of slow current, at the edges of lakes, and in wetlands. J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 292 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 Size: Small (2–8mm) Characteristics: Gills on abdominal segment 1 vestigial (small and finger-like), gills on ab- dominal segment 2 square operculate (plate- like) and covering succeeding gills, opercu- late gills touch or overlap at midline, fringed gills present on abdominal segments 3–6, setae on caudal filaments restricted to apex of each annulation. Order Plecoptera Of this order we collected only one family: Taeniopterygidae which described in bellow: (Bouchard 2012) Taeniopterygidae Common Name: Giant Stoneflies Habitat: These large stoneflies are most com- monly found in small swiftly flowing streams. They are found in areas of swift current in leaf packs and snags. Size: Large (15–70mm) Characteristics: Larvae are large and dark brown, finely branched gills are present on all 3 thoracicsegments and abdominal segments 1–2. Order Tricoptera in this study we collected only one family in Tricoptera order: Helicopsychidae which described in bellow: (Bouchard 2012). Helicopsychidae Common Name: Snail Case-Maker Caddisflies Habitat: These caddisflies are most commonly found in streams with sand deposits. They are also found on wave-swept shores of lakes. Snail casemaker caddisflies are usually at- tached to rocks and logs. Size: Small (8mm) –the case is usually about the size of a pea. Characteristics: Body curled, all three thoracic segments with sclerotized dorsal plates, stout setae present on anterior edge of pronotum, prosternal horn absent, branched gills present on anterior abdominal segments, anal claw comb-shaped (with many small teeth), case shaped like a snail shell. Table 1. Collected insect orders from different habitats, Babol and Amol, Mazandaran Province, 2012 Habitat Orders Rice- field Ephemeroptera Diptera _____ _____ Slow moving river Ephemeroptera Diptera Hemiptera Trichoptera Temporary pond Ephemeroptera Diptera Hemiptera _____ Shallow stream Ephemeroptera _____ Hemiptera Trichoptera Odonata Turbulent river _____ Diptera Hemiptera Trichoptera Plecoptera Table 2. Biodiversity of families in 6 orders of aquatic insects collected in Babol and Amol, Mazandaran Province, 2012 Order No. of Families Diptera 5 Odonata 4 Hemiptera 4 Ephemeroptera 3 Plecoptera 1 Trichoptera 1 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 293 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 Table 3. Aquatic insects families frequency collected from Babol And Amol, Mazandaran Province, 2012 Order Sub.Order Family No. (%) Total (%) Diptera Culicidae 26 (13.27) 48 (24.5) Simulidae 10 (5.1) Chironomidae 7 (3.58) Tipulidae 4 (2.04) Blephariceridae 1 (0.51) Trichoptera Helicopsychidae 39 (19.9) 39 (19.9) Ephemeroptera Baetidae 34 (17.35) 37 (18.88) Heptagenidae 2 (1.02) Caenidae 1 (0.51) Plecoptera Taeniopterygidae 27 (13.77) 27 (13.77) Hemiptera Corixidae 12 (6.12) 25 (12.75) Nepidae 6 (3.06) Gerridae 4 (2.04) Notonectidae 3 (1.53) Odonata Zygoptera Caloepterygidae 15 (7.65) 20 (10.2) Coenagrionidae 3 (1.53) Lestidae 1 (0.51) Anisoptera Aeshnidae 1 (0.51) Total 196 (100) Fig. 1. The study areas of sampling and collecting aquatic insects Fig. 2. Order Diptera: a. Culicidae, b.Chironomidae, c.Blephariceridae, d.Simulidae, e.Tipulidae J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 294 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 Fig. 3. Order Hemiptera: Nepidae Fig. 4. Order Odonata: a.Coenagrionidae, b.Caloepterygidae Fig. 5. Order Ephemeroptera: a.Baetidae, b.Caenidae, c.Heptagenidae Fig. 6. Order Plecoptera: Taeniotorygidae Fig. 7. Order Trichoptera: Helicopsychidae Fig. 8. Percentage of aquatic insects orders, Babol and Amol, Mazandaran Province, 2012 Discussion Given that Babol and Amol district in Ma- zandaran Province are in humid climate re- gions with suitable ecological factors humid, moderate temperature and the variety of plant species where there are different species of aquatic insects in different habitats (slow mov- ing and turbulent rivers, shallow streams, tem- porary pond, and rice fields, these areas are the appropriate places for the growth of aquatic insects and sample collection. In the current study, the most prevalent collected sample was Diptera with five families (24.5%) and Trichoptera, Ephimeroptera, Plecoptera, He- miptera and Odonata seted in latter rank re- spectively. In a study conducted in Yamuna in summer, as well as the results of our study the most b a c J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 295 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 abundant order were Diptera and Hemiptera, Coleoptera and Odonata seted in latter rank respectively (Gapta and Paliwal 2010). In a study conducted in USA Ephimer- optera, Odonata, Plecoptera, Hemiptera, Meg- aloptera, Coleoptera, Trichoptera and Diptera presented in eight major order of aquatic in- sects (Reese Voshell 2009). We collected five order of this eight order in clouded: Diptera, Trichoptera, Ephimeroptera, Plecoptera, He- miptera and Odonata. In a study conducted in Nigeria abundance of order of aquatic insecs were as follows: Ephimeroptera >Odonata >Coleoptera > Diptera >Pelicoptera >Tricoptera (Ohiokhioya 2009). Ephemeroptera (Mayflies) Mayfly larvae are found in a variety of locations including lakes, wetlands, streams, and rivers, but they are most common and diverse in lotic habitats. They are common and abundant in stream riffles and pools, at lake margins and in some cases lake bot- toms. Most of them eat plant material, either by scraping algae or collecting small pieces of detritus from the bottom. They have in- complete metamorphosis. All mayfly larvae are aquatic and breathe dissolved oxygen by means of gills on the abdomen with terres- trial adults. In most mayfly species the adult only lives for 1–2 days. Consequently, the majority of a mayfly’s life is spent in the wa- ter as a larva. The adult lifespan is so short there is no need for the insect to feed and therefore the adult does not possess function- al mouthparts so never eat. Mayflies are often an indicator of good water quality because most mayflies are relatively intolerant of pol- lution. Mayflies are also an important food source for fish (Reese Voshell 2009, Bou- chard 2012). In this study, we were founded may flies in rice-field, slow moving river, temporary pond and shallow stream, but don’t fonded of turbulent river. Of this order we collected 3 families: Baetidae (91/5%), Heptagenidae (5/5%) and Caenidae (3%). Caddisflies (Tricoptera) Trichoptera is the largest order of insects in which most members are truly aquatic. Tri- choptera are close relatives of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) and like Lepidoptera, Lar- vae of different caddisflies live in a wide va- riety of flowing and standing waters. They also have a wide range of feeding habits, in- cluding scraping algae, collecting fine parti- cles of detritus from the bottom or from the water, shredding dead leaves, and preying on other invertebrates. They breathe dissolved oxygen by means of gills and their overall body surfaces have complete metamorphosis and remain in the water for the pupa stage. Caddisflies have the ability to spin silk. This adaptation may be largely responsible for the success of this group. Silk is used to build retreats, to build nets for collecting food, for construction of cases, for anchoring to the substrate, and to spin a cocoon for the pupa. Almost all caddisflies live in a case or retreat with the exception of Rhyacophilidae. Cad- disflies are important in aquatic ecosystems because they process organic material and are an important food source for fish. This group displays a variety of feeding habits such as filter/collectors, collector/gatherers, scrapers, shredders, piercer/herbivores, and predators. Caddisflies are most abundant in running (lotic) waters. Like Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera, many Trichoptera species are sensitive to pol- lution but a few kinds are somewhat tolerant of moderate levels of pollution. (Reese Voshell 2009, Bouchard 2012). In this study, we wre founded Trichoptera in slow moving river, shallow stream and Turbulent river. Plecoptera (Stoneflies) Plecoptera have incomplete metamorpho- sis. They larvae are almost exclusively found in running waters and they reach their great- J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 296 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 est diversity in small cold streams. They are generally associated with coarse substrates such as cobble, leaf packs, and large woody debris. Plecoptera are the most sensitive or- der of aquatic insects and many species are restricted to habitats with high levels of dis- solved oxygen. Some have gills on their thor- ax, but others just obtain dissolved oxygen all over their body. Some feed on plant ma- terial, either by shredding dead leaves and other large pieces of detritus, while others are predators.When a stonefly larva is ready to emerge as an adult, it crawls out of the wa- ter and sheds the larval skin or exoskeleton. Compared to the length of the immature stage (6 months to 3 years), the adult life span is short and usually lasts only 1–4 weeks. Many adult stoneflies exhibit an interest- ing behavior of drumming to locate mates. A male will usually initiate drumming by tap- ping its abdomen on the substrate. A female that perceives the vibrations will then drum a response. By moving toward each other while periodically stopping to drum, males and fe- males are able to locate each other. In order to insure that males and females of the same species find each other, each species has a unique drumming pattern. The most unusual feature of this group is that some kinds are programmed to emerge only during the cold- est months, hence, they are called the winter stoneflies. Like Ephemeroptera and Tricop- tera, Almost all of the stoneflies are sensitive to pollution. In this study, we found Plecoptera in tur- bulent river but didn’t find in rice-field, slow moving river, temporary pond and shallow stream. Hemiptera (True Bugs) Most of the true bugs live on land, but the aquatic kinds are most common in the shal- low areas around the edge of standing wa- ters. Both the adults and the larvae of the aquatic kinds live in the water. Both stages are usually found on submerged aquatic plants. Almost all of them are predators. They breathe oxygen from the air, either by taking a bub- ble underwater or by sticking a breathing tube up into the air. They have incomplete meta- morphosis. Most kinds are tolerant of pollution. True bugs have a sharp beak that they stick into the body of their prey, and then they pump in poison to kill their prey, after which they suck out the body fluids. Some of the larger kinds feed on small fish and tadpoles (Reese Voshell 2009). Due to their ability to utilize atmospheric oxygen, Hemiptera are often able to exist in water bodies with low levels of dissolved oxygen (Bouchard 2012). In this study, we found Hemiptera in tur- bulent river, slow moving river, temporary pond and shallow stream, but don’t fonded in rice-field. Of this order we collected 4 families: Corixidae (48%), Neppidae (24%), Geridae (16%) and Notonectidae (12%). Odonata (Dragonflies and Damselflies) Most people are familiar with large drag- onflies observed flying over ponds, marshes, and fields. Less well known are the aquatic larvae of these insects. They have incomplete metamorphosis. Odonates are most abundant and diverse in lentic (standing) waters, but many species also occur in lotic (flowing) wa- ters. Larvae breathe dissolved oxygen with gills, which are located either inside the rear portion of the abdomen (dragonflies) or on the end of the abdomen (damselflies). All adult and larval odonates are predatory. Most Odonata larvae are sit-and-wait predators, which means they remain motionless until an insect or small fish approaches the larva. When a prey item comes close, the larva rapidly extends its labium (lower lip) and grasps the prey with its jaw-like palps. The most unu- sual feature of this group is the way the lar- vae catch their food with an elbowed lower lip, which they can shoot out in front of the head. The adults feed on arthropods such as J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 297 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 other insects (including other dragonflies and damselflies) and spiders. Adult odonates, especially dragonflies, are strong fliers and catch much of their prey on the wing. Many kinds are fairly tolerant of pollution, but some kinds only live in unique habitats, such as bogs high in the mountains. In this study, we founde odonata only in shallow stream. We found Zygoptera and An- isoptera suborder. From suborder Zygoptera we found 3 Families: Caleopterygidae (79%), Coenagrionidae (15/7%) and Lestidae (5/2%), ad in Anisoptera suborder we founded only one sample of Aeshnidae. Diptera (True Flies) Diptera considered aquatic have aquatic larvae and pupae with terrestrial adults. Many other aquatic insects are also commonly re- ferred to as “flies” (eg mayflies, dragonflies, stoneflies, caddisflies, alderflies, fishflies), but these taxa are not true flies as they do not belong to the order Diptera. When referring to true flies or Diptera with their common names, the word “fly” is separate (eg crane fly, black fly, moth fly dance fly, flower fly). In contrast, common names for non-dipteran taxa are one word. The true flies are ex- tremely important in aquatic food webs and often are the most diverse and abundant ma- croinvertebrate taxon collected in many fresh- water habitats. They have a wide range of feed- ing habits, including scraping algae, collect- ing fine particles of detritus from the bottom or from the water, shredding dead leaves, and preying on other invertebrates. Diptera inhabit a wide range of habitats and some taxa are extremely tolerant and occur in heavily polluted water bodies. They breathe dissolved oxygen by means of gills and their verall body surface. True flies have complete meta- morphosis and remain in the water for the pupa stage. The most distinctive feature of this group is their ecological diversity. Some kinds live in the cleanest habitats (eg swift, cool, mountain streams), while others live in some of the harshest natural habitats on the earth (e.g., arctic tundra ponds, geothermal springs, alkaline lakes, mucky swamps). They have equally diverse responses to pollution, with some kinds being exceptionally sensitive, while other kinds endure the worst imagina- ble water quality (eg raw sewage or acid mine drainage). Some true flies can be a nuisance due to their blood feeding behaviors (Bou- chard 2012). In this study, we found Diptera in rice- field, slow moving river, temporary pond and turbulent river, but didn’t find in shallow stream. From this order we collected 5 fami- lies: Culicidae (54/1%), Simulidae (20/8) Chi- ronomidae (14/5%), Tipulidae (8/3%) and Blepharieridaec (2%). Conclusion Aquatic insects play an important role for biological control of larvae and adults of mos- quitoes. On the other hand some of them are vectors of human and animal diseases, for example in Iran several species belong to Anopheline including Anopheles culicifacies s.l., An. stephensi, An. dthali, An. fluviatilis s.l., An. superpictus, are known to be the malaria vectors (Naddaf et al. 2003, Doosti et al. 2003, Oshaghi et al. 2003, Oshaghi et al. 2006, Vatandoost et al. 2006, Davari et al. 2007, Hanafi-Bojd et al. 2011, Mehravaran et al. 2011, Oshaghi et al. 2011, Vatandoost et al. 2011, Hanafi-Bojd et al. 2012a,b, c, Vatan- doost and Abai 2012, Soleimani-Ahmadi et al. 2012a,b, Vatandoost and Hanafi-Bojd 2012). Therefore the understanding of ecological specifications of aquatic insects could provide a clue for further Arthropod-borne disease control. Additionally aquatic insect could be used for classification of water bodies. Acknowledgements This study was funded by the School of J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 298 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 Public Health of Tehran University of Medi- cal Sciences and we are thankful to staff of Babol health center for their sundry precious contribution. References Aditya G, Bhattacharyya S, Kundu N, Saha GK, Raut SK (2004) Predatory efficiency of water bug Sphaerodema annulatum on mosquito larvae (Culex quinquefascia- tus) and its effect on adult emergence. Bioresour Technol. 95: 169–172. Aditya G, Bhattacharyya S, Kundu N, Saha GK (2005) Frequency dependent prey- selection of predacious water bugs on Armigeres subalbatus immature. J Vec- tor Borne Disease. 42: 9–14. Agarwal PC, Satyrthi DK, Verma RK (2008) Aquatic insects as indicator of water quality related to physic-chemical pa- rameters. International Journal of Men- del. 25: 5–6. Askari O, Farshbaf Pourabad R, Khaganinia S (2009) Faunistic study of Heteroptera of Zanjanroud region in Zanjan Prov- ince of Iran. Munis Entomology. 4: 560–563. Belayeva NV, Rasnitsyn AP, Quicke DLJ (2002) History of insects. 1st Ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Benke AC (1979) A modification of the hynes method for estimating secondary production with particular significance for multivoltine populations. Limnol Oceanogr. 24: 168–171. Blaustein L, Kotler BP, Ward D (1995) Di- rect and indirect effects of a predatory backswimmer (Notonecta maculata) on community structure of desert tempo- rary pools. Ecological Entomology. 20: 311–318. Blaustein L (1998) Influence of the preda- tory backswimmer Notonecta maculata on invertebrate community structure. Ecological Entomology. 23: 246–252. Borror DJ, White RE (1970) A Field Guide to Insects. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 0-395-91171-0. Bouchard RW (2004) Guide to aquatic in- vertebrates of the upper midwest: iden- tification manual for students, citizen monitors, and aquatic resource profes- sionals, University of Minnesota, Wa- ter Resources Research Center. Brown HP (1987) Biology of riffle beetles. Annu Rev Entomol. 32: 253–273. Chae SJ, Pusterla N, Johnson E, Derock E, Lawler SP, Madigan JE (2000) Infec- tion of Aquatic insects whit Trematode metacercariae carry Ehrlichiaristicii, the case of potomac house fever. J Med Entomol. 37: 619–625. Chapman RF (1998) The insects: structure and function. 4th Ed. Cambridge Uni- versity Press. Chesson J (1984) Effect of notonectids (He- miptera: Notonectidae) on mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): predation or selec- tive oviposition. Environ Entomol. 13: 531–538. Cook GC (1997) Ronald Ross (1857–1932): 100 years since the demonstration of mosquito transmission of Plasmodium spp. on 20 August 1897. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 91: 487–488. Daly HV (1984) General classification and key to the orders of aquatic and semi aquatic insects. In RW Merritt and KW Cummins (ed), An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Ken- dall Hunt Dubuque Iowa. pp. 76–81. Davari B, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, La- donni H, Enayati AA, Shaeghi M, Basseri HR, Rassi Y, Hanafi-Bojd AA (2007) Selection of Anopheles stephensi with DDT and dieldrin and cross-re- sistance spectrum to pyrethroids and fipronil Pestic Biochem Physiol. 89 (2): 97–103. De Villiers PC (1987) Simulium dermatitis in J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 299 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 man-clinical and biological features in South Africa, A case report. South Af- rican Medical Journal. 7: 523–525. Doosti S, Azari-Hamidian S, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Hosseini M (2006) Tax- onomic differentiation of Anopheles sa- charovi and An. maculipennis s.l. (Dip- tera: Culicidae) by seta 2 (antepalmate hair) of larvae in Iran with a historical review and an annotated bibliography of Iranian An.maculipennsi complex. Acta Med Iran. 44: 21–27. Ellis RA, Borden JH (1970) Predation by Notonecta undulata (Heteroptera: No- tonectidae) on larvae of the yellow-fe- ver mosquito. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 63: 963–973. Engel MS, Grimaldi DA (2004) New light shed on the oldest insect. Nature. 427: 627–630. Foil LD (1998) Tabanids as vectors of disease agents. Parasitology Today. 5: 88–96. Gaunt MW, Miles MA (2002) An insect mo- lecular clock dates the origin of the in- sects and accords with palaeontological and biogeographic landmarks. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 19: 748–761. Graham DH (1939) Mosquito life in the Auckland district, Report of Auckland Mosquito Research Committee on an investigation made by David H Gra- ham. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society. 69: 210–244. Gupta M, Paliwal A (2007) Biodiversity of macroinvertebrates in Yamuna River at Firoozabad (UP). Journal of Human Wel- fare and Economy. 2: 202–203. Gupta M, Paliwal A (2010) Role of aquatic insects of water quality in related to physic-chemical parameters in Yamuna River at district Firoazbad (UP). Adv Biomed Res. 1: 71–74. Hanafi-Bojd AA, Azari-Hamidian S, Vatan- doost H, Charrahy Z (2011) Spatio- temporal distribution of malaria vectors (Diptera: Culicidae) across different cli- matic zones Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 6: 498–504. Hanafi-Bojd AA, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Haghdoost AA, Shahi M, Sedaghat MM (2012a) Entomological and epidemiolog- ical attributes for malaria transmission and implementation of vector control in southern Iran. Acta Trop. 121: 85–92. Hanafi-Bojd AA, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Charrahy Z, Haghdoost AA, Zamani G, Abedi F, Sedaghat MM, Soltani M, Shahi M, Raeisi A (2012b) Spatial anal- ysis and mapping of malaria risk in an endemic area, south of Iran: A GIS ap- proach for planning of control. Acta Trop. 122: 132–137. Hanafi-Bojd AA, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi, MA, Charrahy Z, Haghdoost AA, Sedaghat MM, Abedi F, Soltani M, Raeisi A (2012c) Larval habitats and biodiversi- ty of anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a malarious area, south- ern Iran. J Vector Borne Dis. 49: 91– 100. Hosseinie Sh (1978) Aquatic Coleoptera from South-western Iran (Haliplidae, Dytis- cidae and Gyrinidae, with a note on Hydrophilidae). The Coleopterists Bul- letin. 32: 167–176. Hosseinie Sh (1992a) A report on the aquatic Coleoptera of Bushehr, Iran. Latissimus (Newsletter of the Balfour-Browne Club). p. 10. Hosseinie Sh (1992b) Report on the aquatic Coleoptera of Hormozgan, Iran. Latissi- mus (Newsletter of the Balfour-Browne Club). pp. 1–22. Hosseinie Sh (1994) A survey of the water Beetles of Khuzestan, Iran. Latissimus (Newsletter of the Balfour-Browne Club). pp. 1–23. Hosseinie Sh (1995a) Report on the aquatic Coleoptera of Guilan, a province in the North of Iran. Latissimus (Newsletter of the Balfour- Browne Club). pp. 1–11. Hosseinie Sh (1995b) Water beetles in the J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 300 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 Mazandaran Province, North of Iran. Latissimus (Newsletter of the Balfour- Browne Club). pp. 1–20. Merritt RW, Cummins KW (1996) An Intro- duction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. (Third Edition). Kendall Hunt Publishing Company. Dubuque Iowa. pp. 76–81. James HG (1966) Insect predators of univoltine mosquitoes in woodland pools of the Pre-Cambrian shield in Ontario. Can Entomol. 98: 550–555. Jewett SGJr (1963) A stonefly aquatic in the adult stage. Science. 139: 484–485. Kashian DR, Zuellig RE, Mitchell KA, Clem- ents WH (2007) The cost of tolerance: sensitivity of stream benthic communi- ties to UV-B and metals. Ecol Appl. 17: 365–375. Krishnamoorti K, Sarkar P (1979) Macroin- vertebrates as indicator of water qual- ity. Proceeding of Symposium on En- vironmental Biology. pp. 133–138. Lester PJ, Pike AJ (2003) Container surface area and water depth influence the population dynamics of the mosquito Culex pervigilans (Diptera: Culicidae) and its associated predators in New Zealand. J Vector Ecol. 28: 267–274. Mehravaran A, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Abai, MR, Ebrahimzadeh A, Roodi AM, Grouhi A (2011) First report on Anoph- eles fluviatilis U in southeastern Iran. Acta Trop. 117: 76–81. Murdoch WW, Scott MA, Ebsworth P (1984) Effects of the general predator, No- tonecta (Hemiptera) upon a freshwater community. J Anim Ecol. 53: 791–808. Naddaf SR, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Asmar M (2003) Molecular characteri- zation of the Anopheles fluviatilis spe- cies complex in Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 9: 257–265. Imoobe OT, Ohiozebau E (2009) Pollution status of a tropical forest river using aquatic insects as indicators. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Afr J Ecol. 48: 232–238. Oshaghi MA, Sedaghat MM, Vatandoost H (2003) Molecular characterization of the Anopheles maculipennis complex in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediter- ranean Health J. 9(4): 659–666. Oshaghi MA, Yaghoobi F, Vatandoost H, Abai MR, Akbarzadeh K (2006) Anoph- eles stephensi biological forms, geo- graphical distribution, and malaria trans- mission in malarious regions in Iran. Pa- kistan Journal of Biological Science. 9: 294–298. Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Goruhi A, Abai MR, Madjidpour A, Arshai S, Sadeghi H, Nazari M, Mehravaran A (2011) Anophe- line species composition in borderline of Iran-Azerbaijan. Acta Trop. 119: 44– 49. Pandian TJ, Mathavan S, Jeyagopal CP (1979) Influence of temperature and body weight on mosquito predation by the dragonfly nymph Mesogomphus line- atus. Hydrobiologia. 62: 99–104. Peckarsky BL (1984) Predator-prey interac- tions among aquatic insects, In VH Resh, DM Rosenberg. eds. The ecology of aquatic insects. New York. Praeger Pub- lishers. pp. 196–254. Pramanic MK, Raut SK (2003) The water bug Sphaerodema rusticum killing vec- tor mosquito larvae. Journal of Nation- al Taiwan Museum. 56: 19–24. Pritchard G, McKee MH, Pike EM, Scrimgeour GJ, Zloty J (1993) Did the first insects live in water or in air? Biol J Linn Soc. 49: 31–44. Reese Voshell J (2009) Sustaining Amer- ica’s Aquatic Biodiversity Aquatic In- sect Biodiversity and Conservation Pro- duced. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Resh VH, Solem JO (1984) Phylogenetic re- lationships and evolutionary adaptations of aquatic insects. An Introduction to J Arthropod-Borne Dis, June 2017, 11(2): 286–301 M Shaeghi et al.: Faunistic Study of … 301 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: May 27, 2017 the Aquatic Insects of North America. Editors Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Kendall Hunt, Publising Company. pp. 66–75. Ross HH (1967) The evolution and past dis- persal of the Trichoptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 12: 169–206. Soleimani-Ahmadi M, Vatandoost H, Shaeghi M, Raeisi A, Abedi F, Eshraghian MR, Madani A, Safari R, Oshaghi MA, Ab- tahi M, Hajjaran H (2012a) Field eval- uation of permethrin Long-Lasting In- secticide Treated Nets (Olyset®) for ma- laria control in an endemic area, south - east of Iran. Acta Trop. 123: 146–153. Soleimanai-Ahmadi M, Vatandoost H, Shaeghi M, Raeisi A, Abedi F, Eshraghian MR, Safari R, Shahi M, Mojahedi A, Poorah- mad-Garbani F (2012b) Vector ecolo- gy and susceptibility in a malaria en- demic focus for implementation of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Net. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 18: 1034– 1041. Sunahara T, Ishizaka K, Mogi M (2002) Hab- itat size: a factor determining the op- portunity for encounters between mos- quito larvae and aquatic predators. J Vector Ecol. 27: 8–20. Tirgari S (1979) Distribution, Frequency and Identification Key of Odonata Order in Iran. Publication of Iranian Entomolo- gists Society. Iran, pp. 49–54. Vafaei R, Ostovan H, Incekara Ü, Pešić V (2007) Faunistic study of the aquatic beetles (Coleoptera: Polyphaga) of Markazi Province (Central Iran) with new records. Archives of Biological Science. 59: 239–242. Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Abaie MR, Shahi M, Yaghoobi F, Baghaii M (2006) Bi- onomics of Anopheles stephensi Liston in the malarious area of Hormozgan Province, southern Iran. Acta Trop. 97: 196–205. Vatandoost H, Emami SN, Oshaghi MA, Abai MR (2011) Ecology of malaria vector Anopheles culicifacies in a malarious area of Sistan va Baluchestan Province, south-east Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 17: 439–445. Vatandoost H, Abai MR (2012) Irritability of Anopheles sacharovi to different in- secticides in a malaria- prone area, Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 5: 113–116. Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd AA (2012) The indication of pyrethroid resistance in the main malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi from Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 5: 722–726. Waters TF (1979) Influence of benthos life history upon the estimation of second- ary production. J Fish Res Board Can. 36: 1425–1430. William Bouchard R (2012) Guide to Aquatic Invertebrate Families of Mongolia, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA, pp. 38–198. Williams DD, Feltmate BW (1992) Aquatic insects, 1st Ed. Redwood Press Ltd.