5- Dr Rassi Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2011, 5(2): 32–41 A Aghaei Afshar et al.: Susceptibility Status of … 32 Original Article Susceptibility Status of Phlebotomus papatasi and P. sergenti (Diptera: Psychodidae) to DDT and Deltamethrin in a Focus of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis after Earthquake Strike in Bam, Iran A Aghaei Afshar1, *Y Rassi1, I Sharifi2, MR Abai1, MA Oshaghi1, MR Yaghoobi-Ershadi1, H Vatandoost1 1Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran 2 Leishmaniasis Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran (Received 5 Apr 2011; accepted 12 Oct 2011) Abstract Background: The cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) has been occurred in Dehbakri County, located 46 km of Bam Dis- trict, Kerman Province since 2004–2005. Phlebotomus papatasi is an important vector of zoonotic cutaneous leishmanisis (ZCL) as well as sand fly fever and P. sergenti is considered as main vector of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) in Iran. There are several measures for vector control with emphasizing on insecticides. The objective of this study was to determine the baseline susceptibility of leishmaniasis vectors to the DDT and del- tamethrin in an endemic focus of CL in southern Iran. Methods: Baseline susceptibility tests were carried out on field collected strains of P. papatasi and P. sergenti and tested with WHO impregnated papers with DDT 4.0% and deltamethrin 0.05% in the focus of disease in Dehbakri County during summer 2010. The values of LT50 and LT90 were determined using probit analysis and regression lines. Results: The LT50 value of DDT 4.0% and deltamethrin 0.05% against P. papatasi was 20.6 and 13.6 minutes re- spectively. The same data for P. sergenti were ranged between 21.8 and 17.7 minutes. Conclusion: The results of tests will provide a guideline for implementation of vector control using pesticides such as impregnated bed nets, indoor residual spraying and fogging. Keywords: Phlebotomus papatasi, Phlebotomus sergenti, insecticides, susceptibility, Iran Introduction Phlebotomine sand flies are known to transmit varieties of zoonotic diseases in- cluding leishmaniases (protozoa), bartonel- losis (bacteria) and sand fly fever (viruses) that affect humans and animals in 88 coun- tries worldwide (Verani et al. 1991, Saidi et al. 1997, Tesh et al. 1997, Mehrabi Tavana 2001, Sharma and Singh 2008, Depaquit et al. 2010). Phlebotomus papatasi is widely distributed throughout the world. It is a com- mon species in the Eastern Mediterranean region and considered as important vector of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis as well as sand fly fever in Iran. Cutaneous Leishmani- asis (CL) is reported from 50% of the 31 provinces in Iran (Yaghoobi-Ershadi et al. 1999, Rassi et al. 2004, Rassi et al. 2006, Rassi et al. 2007, Rassi et al. 2011). The activity of P. papatasi and P. sergenti in Bam starts from late May and extends to mid October with two peaks, one in mid or late June and the second in early or mid Septem- ber. Phlebotomus papatasi could be a Leish- mania vector for humans and gerbils and is *Corresponding author: Prof Yavar Rassi, E-mail: rassiy@sina.tums.ac.ir Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2011, 5(2): 32–41 A Aghaei Afshar et al.: Susceptibility Status of … 33 susceptible to DDT (Yaghoobi-Ershadi and Akhavan 1999). Leishmaniasis is endemic in at least 88 poor countries, with the global prevalence of all forms of the disease is 12 million, with 1.5–2 million cases of CL and half a million cases of visceral form. Current control measures, including envi- ronmental sanitation and drug treatment of cases, are expensive and cannot be sustained effectively by poor countries due to the prob- lems of financing and implementation. More- over, toxicity associated with some of the most widely available drug treatments, in- cluding injections of pentavalent antimony compounds, and the resistance developed by the parasite underline the need for develop- ment of effective methods of prevention, es- pecially vaccines (Noazin et al. 2008, Noazin et al. 2009). The findings indicate that the whole-parasite vaccine candidates tested do not confer significant protection against hu- man leishmaniasis. Cutaneous leishmaniasis is still an im- portant public health problem in many parts of the world, where 90% of the cases occur in seven countries including Iran. Two main species of CL are present in Iran; anthropo- notic CL (ACL) due to L. tropica is the pre- dominant species in many large and medium size cities. The city of Bam has been en- demic for many years and a well-known fo- cus for ACL, where recent field trials of autoclaved L. major vaccine against ACL were conducted. Zoonotic CL (ZCL) caused by L. major, is found in many rural foci in the north, east and south of the country (Sharifi et al. 2010). Emergence or re-emer- gence of CL has recently occurred in many countries. Both ZCL and ACL have been prevalent in a number of rural and urban ar- eas of Iran. They have also emerged in new foci during recent decades (Fazaeli et al. 2009). A new emerging focus of ACL due to L. tropica in rural areas of Dehbakri County, south-eastern Iran, after the earthquake of 2003 has been confirmed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The current emer- gence was unexpected in this rural area, where no previous history of ACL was recorded. According to our knowledge this is the first report of a gradually establishing new ACL focus in rural communities after the 2003 earthquake (Sharifi et al. 2011). Nested PCR revealed the first report of occurrence of ACL due to L. tropica among 3516 inhabi- tants in Jiroft City (Pouresmailian et al. 2010). Molecular and direct detection of Leish- mania parasites revealed the occurrence of ACL in rural parts of the Bam City after earthquake. Natural disaster completely pro- vides favorable condition for sand fly breed- ing places as well as propagation of L. tro- pica in the displaced population due to earth- quake (Sharifi et al. 2011). The fauna and monthly activity of the ACL vector has been studied in Bam using the sticky paper traps. The sand fly species identified were P. sergenti (77.25%), P. pa- patasi (19.00%), Sergentomyia baghdadis (1.69%), S. sintoni (1.64 %) and S. tiberiadis (0.42%). Phlebotomus sergenti was the pre- dominant species, and formed 85.11% and 81.83% of species from the human and ani- mal indoor habitats, respectively. Phleboto- mus sergenti have two peaks of activity dur- ing the year, one of which is from the begin- ning of July, and the other is at the beginning of September (Aghasi and Sharifi 2003). According to the Health Center report the main activities for sand fly control was using DDT as Indoor Residual Spraying when there was malaria problem in the region. Subsequently permethrin is used for space spraying. Deltamethrin impregnated bed nets at the dosage of 25 mg/m2 also had been employed for vector control. The comple- mentary measure was using repellents and covering the lesion with sterile bandage. Dehbakri County is encountered as the newly emerging ACL foci in Kerman Prov- ince since 2003 just after tremendous Bam earthquake. Following this event, some af- Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2011, 5(2): 32–41 A Aghaei Afshar et al.: Susceptibility Status of … 34 fected people were migrated to Dehbakri Country due to temperate climate compared to Bam City. The prevalence of CL was 213.8 per thousand of people during 2003– 2010. In addition, the CL incidence was es- timated 34.3 per thousand people at 2010 (unpublished data). The aim of this study was the determina- tion of baseline data on susceptibility level of P. papatasi and P. sergenti to DDT and deltamethrin in CL affected villages where the chemical intervention was remained as the main choice for CL control method in the Dehbakri focus, southest Iran. Materials and Methods Study area Dehbakri County is located at the foothill of Jebal-Barez Mountain and 48 km far from southwestern of Bam District (Fig. 1). The population of Dehbakri County was 2470 in 2009. The topography of these localities is foothill with the mean altitude of 2000 m above sea level. This area has a semi-desert climate, temperate at summer and cold at winter. The mean of monthly maximum and minimum temperatures were 40 °C and -5 °C in July and Dec respectively. The total an- nual rainfall was 220 mm. The minimum and maximum of monthly relative humidity were 45% and 92% respectively in July and Jan. Fig. 1. Dehbakri Country, located in Bam District, Kerman Province, south of Iran Sand fly collection Sand flies were collected using aspirator from 8.00 pm till 2.00 am during summer 2010. The caught sand flies were transferred to the entomological cage and then were kept by wet towel and transported to labo- ratory research center for implementation of susceptibility tests. Susceptibility test All the susceptibility tests were carried out according to the guideline of WHO (1981). The sand flies were transferred to the exposure tubes and then the mortality was scored at interval logarithmic times and the result was read after 24 hour recovery pe- riod. During the holding time, the insects were supplied with cotton pad of water in 10% sugar solution. All tested sand flies were mounted separately using Puri's media in order to identify the species. Male and female sand flies were counted separately. Insecticide impregnated papers Impregnated papers with DDT 4.0% and deltamethrin 0.05%, as well as control pa- pers were supplied by World Health Organi- zation via Iranian Centre for Diseases Man- agement, Ministry of Health and Medical Education of Iran. Statistical analysis The mortality rates were corrected ac- cording to the result of control tests using Abbott’s formula whereas the control mor- tality rates were ranged between 5.0–20.0% (Abbott 1925). Phlebotomus papatasi and P. sergenti were exposed to WHO standard pa- pers of DDT 4.0% and deltamethrin 0.05% at different logarithmic exposure times and the mortalities were recorded after 24 hour and subsequently analyzed by probit analysis (Finney 1971). Goodness of fit of regression lines of P. papatasi and P. sergenti was measured through the χ2 test. LT50 and LT90 values were estimated and the slope values Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2011, 5(2): 32–41 A Aghaei Afshar et al.: Susceptibility Status of … 35 of the regression lines were calculated. Re- gression lines were plotted for LT50 values for observed probit of mortalities against ex- posure times using Microsoft® Excel soft- ware ver. 2007. Results The mortality rate of field-collected P. papatasi with DDT at diagnostic concentra- tion was 100%. The mortality rate for field- collected P. sergenti with DDT 4.0% and one hour exposure time was calculated 97.0±1%. Considering the criteria of susceptibility for mosquitoes as described by WHO, it should be noted that the tested populations of both P. papatasi and P. sergenti were also sus- ceptible to these insecticides. The LT50 val- ues of DDT 4.0% calculated both for P. pa- patasi and P. sergenti were 20.7 and 20.8 minutes. The LT90 values of DDT 4.0% were 55.6 and 75.2 minutes respectively for both latter species. The LT50 values of deltame- thrin 0.05% calculated both for P. papatasi and P. sergenti were 13.6 and 17.7 minutes respectively. The LT90 values of deltame- thrin 0.05% respectively were 41.9 and 52.0 minutes for P. papatasi and P. sergenti (Ta- ble 1). The regression lines of exposure times of P. papatasi and P. sergenti which exposed to WHO's impregnated papers with DDT 4.0% and deltamethrin 0.05% are shown in Fig. 2. Table 1. Parameters of regression line of susceptibility of P. papatasi and P. sergenti of sand flies exposed to two insecticides In secticid e S p ecies N o of san d fly tested M ean of M ortality (% ) (d iagn ostic d ose-1 h ou r) a (y-in tercep t) B (S lop e) ± S E L T 50 ± 95% C .L . L T 90 ± 95% C .L . X 2 (H eterogen eity) calcu lated X 2 (H eterogen eity) tab le (d f) P . valu e DDT4% P. papatasi 153 100% -3.9736 3.011± 0.493 16.5127 40.1724 52.724 (4) 18.47 (4) <0.001 20.8771 55.6294 26.8631 97.1896 DDT4% P. sergenti 217 97.0±1% -3.1495 2.3547± 0.683 8.5907 32.1209 18.801 (4) 13.28 (4) <0.001 21.7519 76.1663 115.6334 NS Deltamethrin 0.05% P. papatasi 130 100% -2.9641 2.6174± 0.414 10.1957 29.8310 5.553 (4) 9.49 (4) >0.05 13.5665 41.8909 17.7174 73.3799 Deltamethrin 0.05% P. sergenti 212 100% -3.4225 2.7418± 0.352 14.3172 38.4355 7.745(4) 9.49 (4) >0.05 17.7120 51.9639 22.1612 82.2050 Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2011, 5(2): 32–41 A Aghaei Afshar et al.: Susceptibility Status of … 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 10 100 Exposure time (min) P ro b it o f M o rt a li ty DDT P.papatasi DDT P.sergenti Deltamethrin P.papatasi Deltamethrin P.sergenti Fig. 2. Probit regression lines of DDT 4% and deltamethrin 0.05% against P. papatasi and P. sergenti using WHO method at Bam District, southern Iran Discussion Prior of this study, no reports were available on the susceptibility levels of adult P. papatasi and P. sergenti at the new CL focus of Dehbakri County, Bam District, southern Iran. The susceptibility status of P. papatasi to DDT, dieldrin, malathion, feni- trothion and propoxur has been estimated in Pali and Barmer Districts of Rajasthan. The results revealed that this species was resis- tant to DDT but susceptible to other insecti- cides (Singh and Bansal 1996). In a similar study in district Bikaner, Rajasthan the re- sults showed that this species was resistant to DDT, dieldrin and propoxur while sus- ceptible to malathion, fenitrothion and per- methrin (Bansal and Singh 1996). In Iran, the residual spraying was carried out during 1950–1968 and the houses had been treated with DDT for malaria control. The suscep- tibility level of P. papatasi to DDT was studied at various parts of Iran during 1985– 88. Tests were carried out in the localities where the application of DDT had been discontinued since 1969. This investigation showed that P. papatasi from Isfahan was more tolerant to DDT than other parts and probably a manifestation of DDT resistance (Rashti et al. 1992). Another study was car- ried out at 6 villages of Isfahan Province on P. papatasi and the values of LT50 and LT90 ranged between 18.10–20.15 minutes and 43.00–63.30 minutes respectively. In the pre- sent study, the LT50 values of DDT 4.0% against P. papatasi ranged from 20.9 to55.6 minutes. The same data for DDT 4.0 against P. sergenti were ranged between 21.8–76.2 minutes which may related with endophilic habits of fore-mentioned species and expos- ing the sand flies to chemical used inside the houses. The latter study showed the toler- ance in P. papatasi population to DDT 4.0% at 1 hour exposure time with mortality rate of 88.8% (Yaghoobi-Ershadi et al. 1995). The susceptibility status of P. papatasi had been shown at ZCL foci of Fars Province, southern Iran and the results indicating the highly susceptibility level of this species to DDT in this area (Abai et al. 1993, Rassi et al. 2000). There are several reports revealing DDT resistance at P. papatasi, P. argentipes and Sergentomyia shorti from India (Joshi et al. 1979, Mukhopadhyay, 1992, Maroli and Khoury 2004) as well as P. papatasi in Turkey (WHO 1986). In contrast, there are also some reports emphasizing to highly sus- ceptibility levels of P. papatasi and P. ar- Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2011, 5(2): 32–41 A Aghaei Afshar et al.: Susceptibility Status of … 37 gentipes at different countries (Rahman et al. 1982, Dergacheva et al. 1986, Pener et al. 1987, Kaushal 1995, Fahnmy et al. 1996). Resistance of P. papatasi to DDT is first reported in Bihar (Joshi et al. 1979) and then in Turkey (WHO 1986). Mean of LC90 values for DDT for Egyptian and Sudanese strains of P. papatasi ranged from 0.80– 1.93% (Schmidt et al. 1969). The LC50 for DDT for Sudan P. papatasi was reported as 0.9% (Qutubuddin 1964). Results obtained from susceptibility tests on field population of P. papatasi to DDT revealed that the tested population was highly susceptible to DDT as evidenced by the discriminating concentrations of times. In Iranian foci of zoonotic leishmaniasis, control of malaria with DDT yielded no effect on the incidence of leishmaniasis or the sand fly population (Seyedi-Rashti and Nadim 1974). Measures used to control adult sand fly includes appli- cation of insecticides as residual spraying at dwellings and animal shelters, space-spray- ing, insecticide-treated nets and curtains, and personal protection through application of repellents/insecticides to skin or fabrics. Be- cause the breeding places of sand flies which are generally unknown, the control measures that act specifically against immature are not feasible, although the effectiveness of a few biological and chemical agents has been demonstrated in laboratory evaluations (Alex- ander and Maroli 2003). In some circum- stances the reservoir control is also recom- mended. Additionally the patient treatment with anti-parasite drug has been prescribed at the acute stage of disease (Yaghoobi- Ershadi et al. 2000). Tolerance of P. pa- patasi to DDT has been reported from some parts of country (Rashti et al. 1992, Abai et al. 1993, Yaghoobi-Ershadi et al. 1995). This study showed the higher suscep- tibility level of P. papatasi and P. sergenti to deltamethrin 0.05% (LT50=13.6–17.7 minutes) and so this insecticides could be effectively used as residual spraying or as ITNs or LLINs in order to control the CL foci of Iran. Due to epidemic condition of CL, the affected villages of Dehbakri County were sprayed with deltamethrin WP 5.0% at 25 mg ai/m2 during June 2010. Acknowledgements This study was financially supported from the School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, and Grant No. 10487. The authors would like to thank the Dermatology and Leishmaniasis Re- search Center, Kerman University of Medi- cal Sciences for their close collaboration in this study. We also wish to express our sin- cere thanks to the Iranian Centre of Diseases Management, Ministry of Health and Medi- cal Education for providing facilities needed for this study. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests. References Abai MR, Javadian E (1993) Preliminary observation on the susceptibility status of Phlebotomus papatasi (Phlebotomi- nae, Diptera) to DDT and propoxur in Neiriz District, southern I.R.Iran. Pro- ceedings of the 11th Congress of Plant protection, 28 August–2 September 2002, Ghilan University, Rasht. p. 297. Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 18: 265–267. Aghasi M, Sharifi I (2003) Survey of the fauna and monthly activity of the sandfly as the vectors of the cutaneous leishmaniasis in the City of Bam. J Kerman Univ Med Sci.10: 85–91. Alexander B, Maroli M (2003) Control of phlebotomine sandflies. Med Vet En- tomol. 17: 1–18. Azizi K, Rassi Y, Javadian E, Motazedian MH, Asgari Q, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR (2008) First detection of Leishmania Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2011, 5(2): 32–41 A Aghaei Afshar et al.: Susceptibility Status of … 38 infantum in Phlebotomus (Larroussius) major (Diptera: Psychodidae) from Iran. J Med Entomol. 45: 726–731. Azizi K, Rassi Y, Javadian E, Motazedian MH, Rafizadeh S, Yaghoobi Ershadi MR, Mohebali M (2006) Phlebotomus (Paraphlebotomus) alexandri: a prob- able vector of Leishmania infantum in Iran. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 100: 63–68. Bansal SK, Singh KV (1996) Susceptibility status of Phlebotomus papatasi and Sergentomyia punjabaensis (Diptera: Psychodidae) to some insecticides in district Bikaner (Rajasthan). J Commun Dis. 28: 28–32. Cross ER, Hyams KC (1996) The potential effect of global warming on the geo- graphic and seasonal distribution of Phlebotomus papatasi in Southwest Asia. Environ. Health Perspect. 104: 724–727. Cross ER, Newcomb WW, Tucker CJ (1996) Use of weather data and re- mote sensing to predict the geographic and seasonal distribution of Phleboto- mus papatasi in Southwest Asia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 54: 530–536. Depaquit J, Grandadam M, Fouque F, Andry PE, Peyrefitte C (2010) Arthro- pod-borne viruses transmitted by Phle- botomine sandflies in Europe: a review. Euro Surveill.15(10): 195–207. Dergacheva TI, Strekova MV (1986) Sensitiity of Phlebotomus papatasi (Scopoli) (Diptera:Pyschodidae) to DDT in the Mubarek region of the Uzbek SSR. Med Prazit Parazitarnye Bolezni. 4: 84–85. Fahnmy RA, Khater EI, Sawaf BE, Shehata M (1996) Insecticide susceptibility status of field populations of sandfly Phlebotomus papatasi in the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. World Health Or- ganization. Unpublished document. WHO/Leish/96.38. Fazaeli A, Fouladi B, Sharifi I (2009) Emergence of cutaneous leishmaniasis in a border area at south-east of Iran: an epidemiological survey. J Vector- Borne Dis. 46: 36–42. Finney DJ (1971) Probit Analysis (3rd edi- tion). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Joshi GC, Kaul SM, Wattal BL (1979) Susceptibility of sand flies to organo- chlorine insecticides in Bihar (India). Further reports, J Commun Dis. 11: 209–213. Kaul SM, Wattal BL, Bhatnagar VN,Mathur KK (1978) Preliminary observations on the susceptibility status of Phle- botomus argentipes and Phlebotomus papatasi to DDT in two districts of North Bihar, India. J Com Dis. 10: 208–211. Kaushal K, Singh K, Das RK, Rahman SJ, Sharma SK (1995) Laboratory and field observations on the effectiveness of DDT for the control of the vector sand fly, Phlebotomus argentipes in the kala-azar endemic state of Bihar. WHO/Leish/95.36. Maroli M, Khoury C (2004) Prevention and control of leishmaniasis vectors: cur- rent approaches. Parassitologia. 46: 211–215. Mehrabi Tavana A (2001) The seroepidemi- ological studies of sand fly fever in Iran during imposed war. Iran J Publ Health. 30: 145–146. Mohebali M, Javadian E, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA, Hajjaran H, Abaei MR (2004) Characterization of Leish- mania infection in rodents from en- demic areas of the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 10: 591– 599. Moin-Vaziri V, Depaquit J, Yaghoobi-Er- shadi MR, Oshaghi MA, Derakh- shandeh-Peykar P, Ferte H, Kalten- bach M, Bargues MD, Nadim A, Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2011, 5(2): 32–41 A Aghaei Afshar et al.: Susceptibility Status of … 39 Javadian E, Rassi Y, Jafari R (2007) Geographical variation in populations of Phlebotomus (Paraphlebotomus) cau- casicus (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Iran. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 100: 291–295. Moin-Vaziri V, Depaquit J, Yaghoobi-Er- shadi MR, Oshaghi MA, Derakh- shandeh- Peykar P, Ferté H, Kalten- bach M, Bargues MD, Léger N, Nadim A (2007) Intraspecific varia- tion within Phlebotomus sergenti Par- rot (1917) (Diptera: Psychodidae) based on mtDNA sequences in Islamic Re- public of Iran. Acta Trop. 102: 29–37. Mukhopadhyay AK, Axena NBL, Narasim- ham MVV (1992) Susceptibility status of Phlebotomus argentipes to DDT in some kala azar endemic districts of Bihar, India. WHO/CTD/VBC/92.995, WHO/Leish/92.31, p. 1–6. Noazin S, Farrokh Modabber F, Khamesi- pour A, Smith PG, Moulton LH, Nas- seri K, Sharifi I, Khalil H, Velez Ber- nali ID, Antunesj CMF, Kieny MP, Tanner M (2008) First generation leish- maniasis vaccines: A review of field efficacy trials. Vaccine. 26: 6759–6767. Noazin S, Khamesipour A, Moulton LH, Tannerd M, Nasserie K, Modabberb F, Sharifig I, Khalil H, Velez Bernali ID, Antunesj CMF, Smith PG (2009) Efficacy of killed whole-parasite vac- cines in the prevention of leishmani- asis, A meta-analysis. Vaccine 27: 4747–4753. Pener H, Wilamovsky A (1987) Basline suceptibility of Phlebotomus papatasi to insecticides. Med Vet Entomol. 1: 147–149. Pouresmailian S, Sharifi I, Mirzai M, Zarean M, Hakimi Parizi M (2010) Occur- rence of new focus of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) in northern part of Jirof City, Kerman Province, Iran. 7th national and 2nd Regional Congress of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases in Iran, 6–9 November 2010, Tehran, Iran. Qutubuddin Q (1964) Preliminary note on the susceptibility of Phlebotomus to insecticides. Sudan Medical Journal. 3: 11–15. Rahman SJ, Wattal BL, Mathur KK, Joshi GC, Kumar K (1982) Susceptibility of Phlebotomus papatasi (Scopoli) to or- ganochlorine insecticides. J Com Dis. 14: 122–124. Rashti MA, Panah HY, Mohamadi HS, Jedari M (1992) Susceptibility of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psy- chodidae) to DDT in some foci of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 8: 99–100. Rassi Y, Jalali M, Vatandoost H (2000) Susceptibility status of Phlebotomus papatasi to DDT in Arsanjan County (The new focus of cutaneous leishma- niasis ) in Fars province, Iran. Iran J Publ Hlth 29: 21–26. Rassi Y, Javadian E, Jalali M, Motazedian MH, Vatandoost H (2004) Investiga- tion on Zoonotic Cutaneous Leishma- niasis, southern Iran. Iran J Publ Health. 33: 31–35. Rassi Y, Gassemi MM, Javadian E, Rafi- zadeh S, Motazedian H, Vatandoost H (2007) Vectors and reservoirs of cu- taneous leishmaniasis in Marvdasht district, southern Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 3: 686–693. Rassi Y, Javadian E, Amini M, Rafizadeh S, Vatandoost H and Motazedian MH (2006) Meriones libycus is the Main reservoir of zoonotic cutaneous leish- maniasis in south Islamic Republic Iran, East Mediterr Health J. 12: 474– 477 Rassi Y, Oshaghi MA, Mohammadi Azani S, Abaie MR, Rafizadeh S Mohebai M Mohtarami F, Zeinali MK (2011) Molecular detection of Leishmania in- fection due to Leishmania major and Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2011, 5(2): 32–41 A Aghaei Afshar et al.: Susceptibility Status of … 40 Leishmania turanica in the vectors and reservoir host in Iran. Vector-borne and Zoonotic Diseases.11: 145–150 Saidi S, Tesh R, Javadian E, Sahabi Z, Nadim A (1997) Studies on the epi- demiology of sand fly fever in Iran. II. The prevalence of human and animal infection with five phlebotomus fever virus serotypes in Isfahan province. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 26: 288–293. Schmidt ML, Schmidt JR (1969) Insecticide susceptibilities of Phlebotomus pa- patasi (Scopoli) From Yet and the Sudan. J Med Entomol. 6: 87–90. Seyedi-Rashti MA, Nadim A (1974) At- tempts to control zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Isfahan area, Iran. Iran J Publ Health. 2: 199–203. Sharifi I, Fekri AR, Aflatoonian MR, Khamesipour A, Mahboudi F, Dowlati Y, Nadim A, Modabber F (2010) Leishmaniasis recidivans among school children in Bam, South-east Iran, 1994–2006. Int J Dermatol. 49:557–561 Sharifi I , Pouresmailian S, Aflatonian MR, Hakimi Parizi M, Fekri AR, Khamesi- pour A (2010) Occurrence of new focus of anthroponotic cutaneous leish- maniasis (ACL) in Bam and its suburbs after earthquake. 7th National and 2nd Regional Congress of Para- sitology and Parasitic Diseases in Iran. 6–9 November 2010, Tehran, Iran. Sharifi I, Pursmaelian S, Aflatoonian MR, Fotouhi Ardakani R, Hakimi Parizi M, Mirzaei M, Fekri AR, Fasihi Harandi M, Khamesipour A (2011) Emergence of a new focus of anthroponotic cuta- neous leishmaniasis due to Leishma- nia tropica in rural communities of Bam district after the earthquake, Iran. Trop Med Int Health. (in Press) Sharma U, Singh S (2008) Insect vectors of Leishmania: distribution, physiology and their control. J Vector Borne Dis. 45: 255–272. Singh KV, Bansal SK (1996) Insecticide susceptibility of Phlebotomus papatasi to organochlorine, organophosphate and carbamate compounds in some arid areas of western Rajasthan. Indian J Med Res. 103: 91–93. Tesh R, Saidi S, Javadian E, Nadim A (1977) Studies on the Epidemiology of Sand fly Fever in Iran. I. Virus Iso- lates Obtained from Phlebotomus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 26: 282–287 Unpublished data (2010) Leishmaniasis Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Verani P, Nicoletti L, Ciufolini MG, Balducci M (1991) Viruses transmit- ted by sand flies in Italy. Parassito- logia. 33(Suppl): 513–518. World Health Organization (1986) Resis- tance of vectors and reservoirs of dis- ease to pesticides. 10th report of the WHO Expert committee. Vector Biol- ogy and Control. Tech Rep Ser, 737. World Health Organization (1981) Instruc- tions for determining the susceptibility or resistance of blackflies, sand flies and biting midges to insecticides. WHO/VBC/81.810, p.1–6. World Health Organization (2007) Leish- maniasis.http://www.who.int/leishman iasis/en/. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E (1995) Susceptibility status of Phelebotomus papatsi to DDT in the most important focus of zoonotic cutaneous leish- maniasis, Isfahan Province, Iran. Iran J Publ Health. 24: 18–24. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA, Abai MR, Ebrahimi B, Zahraei-Ramazani AR, Vafaei-Nezhad R, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Jafari R (2004) Epidemiological study in a new focus of cutaneous leishma- niasis in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 10: 688–694. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA, Zah- raei-Ramazani AR, Jalali-Zand AR, Iran J Arthropod-Borne Dis, 2011, 5(2): 32–41 A Aghaei Afshar et al.: Susceptibility Status of … 41 Piazak N (2005) Bionomics of Phle- botomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodi- dae) in an endemic focus of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in central Iran. J Vector Ecol. 30: 115–118. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA, Zah- raei-Ramazani AR, Javadian E, Mota- valli-Emami M (2000) Field trial for the control of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniosis in Badrood, Iran. Ann Saudi Med. 20: 386–389. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA (1999) Entomological survey of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in a new focus of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniosis in Iran. Acta Trop. 15(73): 321–326. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Akhavan AA, Zahrai-Ramazani AR, Mohebali M (2001) Epidemiological study in a new focus of cutaneous leish- maniosis due to Leishmania major in Ardestan town, central Iran. Acta Trop. 79: 115–121. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Javadian E, Jafari R, Zahraei-Rama- zani AR, Mohebali M (2002) A new focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania tropica. Saudi Med J. 23: 291–294. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Jafari R, Hanafi-Bojd AA (2004) A new epidemic focus of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in cen- tral Iran. Ann Saudi Med. 24: 98–101. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E, Kannani A (1995) Host preference pattern of phlebotomine sand flies of Borkhar ru- ral district, Isfahan province, Iran. Acta Trop. 60: 155–158. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E, Tahvil- dare-Bidruni GH (1995) Leishmania major MON-26 isolated from natu- rally infected Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Isfahan Pro- vince, Iran. Acta Trop. 59: 279–282. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E, Tahvil- dare-Bidruni GH (1994) The isolation of Leishmania major from Phleboto- mus (Paraphlebotomus) caucasicus, in Isfahan province, Islamic Republic of Iran. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 88: 518–519. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E (1995) Zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis to the north of Isfahan. Human infection in 1991. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 88: 42–45. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E (1996) Epidemiological study of reservoir hosts in an endemic area of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran. Bull WHO. 74: 587–590. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E (1996) Seasonal variation of Leishmania major infection rates in sand flies from rodent burrows in Isfahan province, Iran. Med Vet Entomol. 10: 181–184. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E (1997) Studies on sand flies in a hyperen- demic area of zoonotic cutaneous leish- maniasis in Iran. Indian J Med Res. 105: 61–66. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Moosa-Kazemi SH, Zahraei-Ramazani AR, Jalai-Zand AR, Akhavan AA, Arandain MH, et al. (2006) Evaluation of deltamethrin- impregnated bed nets and curtains for control of zoonotic cutaneous leishmani- asis in a hyperendemic area of Iran. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 99: 43–48.