J Arthropod-Borne Dis, September 2018, 12(3): 321–324 PG de Mendonça: Cross-Genera PCR … 321 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: September 30, 2018 Short Communication Cross-Genera PCR Amplification of DNA from Apicomplexan Parasites *Philippe Gil de Mendonça Institute of Comparative Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (Received 11 Dec 2016; accepted 20 June 2018) Abstract Background: The discovery of an unexpected genetic sequence raised doubts about the specificity of a primer pair targeting Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. This study aimed to check the specificity of this primer pair. Methods: Conventional end-point PCR and real-time PCR protocols using primers targeting the 18S rRNA gene V4 hypervariable region of Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. were tested for potential cross-genera amplification using DNA from a palette of parasitic protists and pathogenic bacteria as a template. These investigations took place at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (Germany) in 2010 as part of the EDEN project. Results: Successful amplification was obtained with DNA from five apicomplexan genera: Babesia, Theileria, Hepa- tozoon, Toxoplasma, and Hammondia. No amplicons were obtained when DNA from Leishmania infantum or bacte- ria within the genera Borrelia, Leptospira or Anaplasma was used as a template. Conclusion: This cross-genera amplification ability is useful for the quick exclusion of many parasite species from PCR negative diagnostic samples. Accurate species identification from PCR positive samples requires genetic se- quencing of the amplicon. Keywords: Babesia, Theileria, Hepatozoon, Toxoplasma, Hammondia Introduction Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. are wide- spread tick-borne parasites. They are a cause of concern to the medical and veterinary community worldwide (1-10). Several species are even considered as an emerging threat to human health (9-10). The EU-funded EDEN project focused specifically on investigating emerging diseases (11). Within this context, arthropod vectors and vertebrate hosts were routinely sampled and screened for a large palette of zoonotic pathogens. A combination of techniques (12), namely PCR followed by reverse-line blot (RLB), was routinely used for screening Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. On various occasions, the panel of RLB probes available was not suitable for the identifica- tion of the parasite species involved. In such cases, amplicons were sequenced. Sequencing revealed the presence of Sarcocystis-like or- ganisms (sequences did not match any known species in GenBank, and identity values were relatively low). These results raised serious concerns about the specificity of the PCR pro- tocol used for screening Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. In order to check for the actual presence of further cases of cross-genera amplification, the tests described below were performed us- ing template DNA from a variety of protists and other microorganisms. Materials and Methods PCR was performed with DNA from ref- erence samples of parasitic protists as a tem- plate. Reference samples of parasitic protists included: Babesia canis, B. capreoli, B. diver- gens, B. gibsoni, B. microti (syn. Theileria mi- croti), B. rodhaini (syn. Theileria rodhaini), B. vogeli, Hepatozoon sylvatici, Toxoplasma *Corresponding author: Dr Philippe Gil de Mendonça, E-mail: pgm@cantab.net http://jad.tums.ac.ir/ J Arthropod-Borne Dis, September 2018, 12(3): 321–324 PG de Mendonça: Cross-Genera PCR … 322 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: September 30, 2018 gondii, Hammondia hammondi and Leishma- nia infantum. PCR was also performed with DNA from wildlife samples (arthropod vectors and ver- tebrate hosts) known to be positive for a pal- ette of bacterial pathogens. These bacterial pathogens included Borrelia afzelii, Leptospira interrogans and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Pure water was used as no-template control. DNA was amplified using primers (F 5’- GACACAGGGAGGTAGTGACAAG and R 5’-CTAAGAATTTCACCTCTGACAGT) tar- geting the 18S rRNA gene V4 hypervariable region of Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. (13). Real-time PCR with dissociation curve anal- ysis was performed with QuantiFast SYBR® Green (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) follow- ing the manufacturer’s instructions. Conventional end-point PCR followed a modified touch-down protocol (14). One cycle at 95 °C for 5min for Hot Start Taq activa- tion was followed by touch-down steps (de- naturation at 94 °C for 20sec, annealing for 30 sec starting at 67 °C and dropping to 57 °C at a rate of 1 °C/step, extension at 72 °C for 30sec) prior to 40 amplification cycles (denaturation at 94 °C for 20sec, annealing at 57 °C for 30sec, extension at 72 °C for 30 sec). Reaction mix composition was: 5.00μl 10x QIAGEN PCR buffer (at 15mM MgCl2), 2.00μl QIAGEN MgCl2 (at 25mM), 1.00μl QI- AGEN dNTPs (10mM), 1.00μl of each primer (10μM), 29.75μl ultra-pure water, 0.25μl QI- AGEN Hot Start Taq Plus (5U/μl). Total vol- ume was 50μl, including 10μl template DNA. PCR products were separated by electropho- resis through 1.5% agarose gels stained with GelRed® (Biotium, Hayward, California). Size markers (reference DNA ladder) were included in each gel. Amplicons and size markers were visualized by UV transillumination. Amplicon sizes were estimated with GelAnalyzer 2010 (www. gelanalyzer.com/download.html). These investigations took place at Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germanyin 2010 as part of the EDEN project. Sequencing of amplicons was performed by Eurofins MWG GmbH (Ebersberg, Germany). Results As expected, all Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. yielded amplicons with strong positive signals on both conventional and real-time PCR, and their sequences were consistent with data available on GenBank, thus confirming successful and accurate PCR amplification of Babesia and Theileria reference samples. Hepatozoon sylvatici, Toxoplasma gondii, and Hammondia hammondi also yielded am- plicons with strong positive signals on both conventional and real-time PCR, and their se- quences were also consistent with data avail- able on GenBank, thus also confirming suc- cessful and accurate PCR amplification of Hepatozoon, Toxoplasma and Hammondia ref- erence samples. No amplicon could be obtained from L. in- fantum. No amplicon was obtained either from any of the bacterial pathogens tested. Melting temperature values for the various species successfully amplified ranged from 79.8 °C to 85.7 °C with overlap between vari- ous species. Amplicon sizes ranged from 402bp to 528bp with overlap between various species. Discussion The taxonomy of protists has undergone many revisions and has been revolutionized from top to bottom in the last few years (15, 16). The taxonomy of the species within the genus Babesia is no exception to this rule (17, 18). However, for the sake of simplicity, a traditional approach was retained in the pre- sent article which is concerned with molecu- lar diagnostic methodology, rather than taxo- nomic changes. The PCR primer pair used in the present http://jad.tums.ac.ir/ http://www.gelanalyzer.com/download.html J Arthropod-Borne Dis, September 2018, 12(3): 321–324 PG de Mendonça: Cross-Genera PCR … 323 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: September 30, 2018 study was known for its ability to detect two closely related protist genera: Babesia and Theileria. The above-mentioned results re- vealed the ability to detect yet further protist genera, namely Hepatozoon and the closely related Toxoplasma and Hammondia. All these genera belong to the Apicomplexa, which suggests that the PCR primer pair used here might amplify even more genera within this phylum. This unexpected widespread cross- genera amplification ability might seem prob- lematic at first glance, however, this turns out to be a rather useful property when consid- ered in a wider context. Indeed, screening with this primer pair makes it possible to exclude a large number of parasitic species at once for those samples yielding negative PCR re- sults, thus avoiding expansive and time-con- suming further testing for the numerous spe- cies within the genera known to be efficient- ly amplified by this peculiar primer pair. As a corollary to this, it will be most useful to perform yet further testing of additional gen- era within the Apicomplexa in order to es- tablish the full width of the palette of genera efficiently amplified and thus detected when screening samples with this primer pair. Ad- ditional testing of protist genera outside the Apicomplexa would also be desirable. Most importantly, due to widespread over- laps in amplicon sizes and melting tempera- tures on the one hand, and due to limitations of the RLB technique on the other hand, ge- netic sequencing of the amplicon is required for accurate species identification. Conclusion The range of detection of the primer pair targeting the 18S rRNA gene V4 hypervaria- ble region of Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. is not limited to these two closely related gen- era. At least three additional apicomplexan genera are efficiently amplified by this pri- mer pair. These genera are Hepatozoon, Toxo- plasma, and Hammondia. Genetic sequenc- ing of the amplicons is required for accurate species identification. Acknowledgments This study was partially funded by EU grant GOCE-2003-010284 EDEN. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. Additional support was provided by the Ba- varian Ministry for Environment and Public Health (VICCI Project - Module 3). It is a pleasure to thank (in non-preferen- tial alphabetical order) L Chaudhuri and C Thiel who kindly made available reference samples of Leishmania infantum, Babesia gib- soni and B. vogeli. The author declares that there is no conflict of interest. References 1. Aktas M, Altay K, Dumanli N (2005) De- velopment of a polymerase chain re- action method for diagnosis of Babe- sia ovis infection in sheep and goats. Vet Parasitol. 133(4): 277–281. 2. Bourdoiseau G (2006) Canine babesiosis in France. Vet Parasitol. 138(1– 2):118–125. 3. Chaudhry ZI, Suleman M, Younus M, Aslim A (2010) Molecular Detection of Babe- sia bigemina and Babesia bovis in Crossbred Carrier Cattle Through PCR. Pakistan J Zool. 42(2): 201–204. 4. Esmaeilnejad B, Tavassoli M, Asri-Rezaei S, Dalir-Naghadeh B, Mardani K, Go- labi M, Arjmand J, Kazemnia A, Jalil- zadeh G (2015) Determination of prev- alence and risk factors of infection with Babesia ovis in small ruminants from West Azerbaijan Province, Iran by pol- ymerase chain reaction. J Arthropod http://jad.tums.ac.ir/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16507334 J Arthropod-Borne Dis, September 2018, 12(3): 321–324 PG de Mendonça: Cross-Genera PCR … 324 http://jad.tums.ac.ir Published Online: September 30, 2018 Borne Dis. 9(2): 246–252. 5. García ATC (2006) Piroplasma infection in dogs in northern Spain. Vet Parasitol. 138(1–2): 97–102. 6. Gorenflot A, Moubri K, Precigout E, Car- cy B, Schetters TP (1998) Human babesiosis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 92: 489–501. 7. Njiiri NE, Bronsvoort BMDC, Collins NE, Steyn HC, Troskie M, Vorster I, Thumbi SM, Sibeko KP, Jennings A, van Wyk IC, Mbole-Kariuki M, Kiara H, Poole EJ, Hanotte O, Coetzer K, Oosthuizen MC, Woolhouse M, Toye P (2015) The epidemiology of tick- borne haemoparasites as determined by the reverse line blot hybridization assay in an intensively studied cohort of calves in western Kenya. Vet Par- asitol. 210(1–2): 69–76. 8. Singh H, Haque JM, Singh NK, Rath SS (2013) PCR based detection of sub- clinical bovine babesiosis in Punjab. Indian J Anim Res. 47(6): 543–546. 9. Vannier E, Krause PJ (2012) Human Babesi- osis. N Engl J Med. 366: 2397–2407. 10. Zhou X, Xia S, Huang JL, Tambo E, Zhuge HX, Zhou XN (2014) Human babesiosis, an emerging tick-borne dis- ease in the People’s Republic of Chi- na. Parasit Vectors. 7: 509. 11. de Mendonça PG (2008) The EDEN pro- ject. Parasitol Res. 103(Suppl.1): 158– 159. 12. Gubbels JM, de Vos AP, Van Der Weide M, Viseras J, Schouls LM, de Vries E, Jongejan F (1999) Simultaneous de- tection of bovine Theileria and Babe- sia species by reverse line blot hy- bridization. J Clin Microbiol. 37(6): 1782–1789. 13. Georges K, Loria GR, Riili S, Greco A, Caracappa S, Jongejan F, Sparagano O (2001) Detection of Haemoparasites in cattle by reverse line blot hybridi- sation with a note on the distribution of ticks in Sicily. Vet Parasitol. 99(4): 273–286. 14. Tonetti N, Berggoetz M, Rühle C, Preto- rius AM, Gern L (2009) Ticks and tick-borne pathogens from wildlife in the Free State Province, South Africa. J Wildl Dis. 45(2): 437–446. 15. Cox FEG (2002) Systematics of the par- asitic Protozoa. Trends Parasitol. 18 (3): 108. 16. Cox FEG (2011) Taxonomy and Classifi- cation of Human Parasitic Protozoa and Helminths. In: Versalovic J, Carroll K, Funke G, Jorgensen J, Landry M, Warnock D (Eds) Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 10th edition. ASM Press, Washington DC, pp. 2041–2046. 17. Allsopp MTEP, Allsopp BA (2006) Mo- lecular sequence evidence for the re- classification of some Babesia species. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1081: 509–517. 18. Uilenberg G (2006) Babesia - A histori- cal overview. Vet Parasitol. 138(1–2): 3–10. http://jad.tums.ac.ir/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16507334 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16507334