Fadia.docx


J Bagh College Dentistry                  Vol. 28(1), March 2016                            The prevalence   
  

Basic Sciences                                                   179 
 

 

The Prevalence of Oral Protozoa Trichomonas tenax in 
some Patients with Gingivitis 

 
Fadia Abd Al-Muhsin Al-Khayat, Ph.D. (1) 
 
ABSTRACT 
Background: As a relationship between gingivitis disease and the presence of the oral protozoa Trichomonas tenax 
has been represented by considerable differences among various study population. The purpose of present study is 
determining the prevalence of T.tenax in patients with gingivitis and healthy subjects. 
Subjects, Materials and Methods: The presence of the parasite has been diagnosed with 58 patients with gingivitis 
and 58 healthy persons during the period of the study(April and May 2015) by taken two swabs for each one, 
microscopic examination was done using saline  wet mount method and stained method. Age, sex and brushing 
teeth habit were in a count. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS program. 
Results: Gingivitis disease was observed in 58patients among the total 163 examined subjects (35.58%)with a highly 
significant differences P<0.01 recorded between males and females(40.22%,30.26% respectively).The prevalence of 
T. tenax in gingivitis patients was higher than healthy(56.89%,6.89%)respectively. According to gender and age the 
highly prevalence rate was demonstrated in males (62.85%) and in the age category 51-60 years old (92.8%). Data 
analysis showed that a highly significant differences P<0.01was demonstrated in the prevalence rate between 
brushing teeth users 29.1% and non-brushing teeth users 11.9%. 
Conclusion: The study confirmed the existence of a relationship between parasite infection and gingivitis disease 
where the higher prevalence of T. tenax was found in gingivitis patients compared with healthy controls. People 
should receive dental care to gain high hygiene oral cavity and have low infection to T. tenax. 
Keyword: Gingivitis, protozoa, Trichomonas tenax. (J Bagh Coll Dentistry 2016; 28(1):179-182). 

INTRODUCTION 
One of the Trichomonadidae family 

membersis the protozoa parasite Trichomonas 
tenax which commonly found in oral cavity of 
humans and frequently associated with 
necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis in patients with 
bad oral hygiene(1). T. tenax infection typically 
produce oral tissue damages and 
bronchopulmonarytrichomoniasis disease may be 
caused when the parasite enters the respiratory 
tract by aspiration (2). 

The main source of infection occurs by direct 
and /or indirect mouth to mouth contact, the 
trophozoite (the only stage  in its life cycle) 
transmit through contaminated eating utensils 
(cups, dishes), saliva droplet spray, and kissing(3). 

Association between this parasite of public 
health importance and oral diseases is not well 
ascertained. So the present study was designed to 
determine the prevalence of T. tenax inpatients 
suffering from gingivitis, age, gender, and 
brushing habit were in a count.  
 
SUBJECT, MATERIALS AND 
METHODS 

For two months (April and May 2015) a total 
of 163 patients of both sex and different ages (87 
male,76 female) who attended Teaching Hospital 
of Dentistry College-Clinics of periodontics-
Baghdad University were examined by periodon- 
(1)Lecturer, Department of Basic sciences, College of Dentistry, 

University of Baghdad. 

tistto detect oral diseases including gingivitis, the 
diagnosis depend on clinical feature including 
color, size, shape, consistency, texture, bleeding 
and painful gingiva. 

 Case history was observed including general 
health, smoking, brushing teeth and antibiotic 
consumption. Fifty eight from the total number 
which recorded as a healthy gingiva persons were 
chosen as control group, while the remaining 47 
patients were diagnosed with other oral cavity 
diseases. 

Direct examination by light microscopic is the 
simplest method for parasitic detection, saline wet 
mount method was used as the collection of 
samples was done by a sterile swab(for 
conformation two swabs were taken from each 
patient)pass over and around the gingival 
crevices, the swab was dipped in sterile tube 
containing normal saline, after that the swab 
rolled on the clean glass slide and examined under 
10x and 40x lens (4), the T. tenax trophozoite was 
identified by its circular movement, oval to pear 
shaped, measuring about 5 - 14 μm long and 
observation of five flagella (4 extend anteriorly 
and one extends posteriorly). To confirm the 
identification, all samples were stained with 
methylene blue stain for 5min. and wash the slide 
by Distilled water (5). 

Statistical analysis was done by SPSS .V.16, 
the inertial statistic use chi-square-test with-p-
value if p<0.05 significant, p>0.05 Non 
significant, p<0.01 High significant. 
 



J Bagh College Dentistry                  Vol. 28(1), March 2016                            The prevalence   
  

Basic Sciences                                                   180 
 

RESULTS 
In table 1, fifty eight patients were recorded as 

positive for gingivitis from the total examined 
number 163 including 35/87 male and 23/76 
female. The overall oral gingivitis rate was 
35.58%, statistic results revealed that highly 
significant differences (p<0.01) were observed 

between male and female 40.22%,30.26% 
respectively. 

In table 2, highly significant differences 
(p<0.01) were demonstrated in the presence of T. 
tenax which detected in 33/58 gingivitis patients 
(56.89%) in compare with only 4/58 of the 
healthy patients (6.89%) 

 
 

Table 1: Gingivitis Rate among 163 Patients 
Infection % No. Positive No. examined Sex 

40.22 35 87 Male 
30.26 23 76 Female 
35.58 58 163 Total 

*Chi-square=53.395, P<0.01 High significant 
 

Table 2: Detection of T. tenax in Gingivitis and Healthy Patients 
Groups No. examined No. Positive Percentage% 

Gingivitis patients 58 33 56.89 
Healthy patients 58 4 6.89 

Total 116 37 31.89 
*Chi-square=27.356, P<0.01 High significant 

 
As shown in table 3, the prevalence of T. 

tenax was higher in males than females, 
detection was observed in 22/35 males (62.85%), 
on the other hand from 23 females only 11 were 

recorded positive (47.82%).The total number of 
positive diagnosis for T. tenax was 33 with a 
prevalence rate 56.89% also a highly significant 
differences (p<0.01) was observed. 
 

Table 3: Prevalence of T. tenax in Gingivitis Patients According to Gender 
Sex No. examined No. Positive for T.tenax Prevalence rate % 

Male 35 22 62.85 
Female 23 11 47.82 
Total 58 33 56.89 

*Chi-square=28.653, P<0.01 High significant 
 

The total number of infections for T. tenax was 
33 (56.89%), distributed between the 22 number 
of infected males (37.9%) and 11number of 
infected females (18.9%).It included the age 
categories from 20 t0 60 years old, the higher 
infection rate was recorded in the age group 51-

60(92.8%) while the lower one was in 20-30 age 
group(16.66%). Statistically, there was no 
significant differences among numbers examined 
while significant differences (P<0.05) was 
observed among positive number(table 4). 

 
Table 4: Prevalence of T.Tenax in Gingivitis Patients According to Age 

Age 
year 

No. examined 
T      M     F 

No. positive 
M     F        T 

Infection rate % 
M          F             T 

20-30 12 9 4 2 0 2 16.66 0 16.66 
31-40 15 11 6 6 2 8 40 13.33 40 
41-50 17 8 6 8 4 12 47 23.52 70.5 
51-60 14 7 7 6 5 11 42.85 35.71 92.8 
Total 58 35 23 22 11 33 37.9 18.9 56.89 

*Chi-square=2.667, p=0.102 P>0.05 Non Significant of No. examined 
*Chi-square=3.270, p=0.043 P<0.05 Significant of No. positive 

 
According to brushing teeth habit, the 

prevalence of T. tenax as higher in non-brush 
tooth users 29.1% as a total of 79 patients were 
examined and 23 were positive, in compare with a 
total of 84 brush-tooth users examined in which T. 

tenax was recorded in 10 patients with prevalence 
rat 11.9%.Thirty three is the positive number from 
the total 163 with a total prevalence rate 20.24 
which means highly significant differences 
between the two categories. 



J Bagh College Dentistry                  Vol. 28(1), March 2016                            The prevalence   
  

Basic Sciences                                                   181 
 

 
Table 5:  T. tenax Prevalence According to Brushing Teeth Habit 
 No. examined No. positive Prevalence % 
Non-Brush tooth users 79 23 29.1 
Brush tooth users 84 10 11.9 
Total 163 33 20.24 

*Chi-square=28.435,  P<0.01 High significant 
 
DISCUSSION 

The inflammation of the gum tissue 
(gingivitis) is in response to bacterial biofilms 
(plaque), the main clinical features for diagnosis 
include the color (bright red), size and shape 
(swollen), consistency (soft), texture (loss of 
stippling), bleeding and painful gingiva with bad 
breath (6). 

Current results showed that the prevalence of 
gingivitis was 35.58%. In a study done by Khansa 
(7), the results revealed that the prevalence of 
gingivitis recorded 76%. Also Sarah (8) found that 
the prevalence was 69%. The differences between 
results among studies may depend on some 
factors that play a role in the prevalence such as 
poor oral hygiene, education and social level and 
different diagnostic criteria (9). Most gingival 
patients were males 35/87(40.22%), while 
females recorded 23/76(30.26%) this may be 
attributed to smoking habit, this finding can be 
explained as smoking affects the prevalence, 
severity of disease by increasing the levels of 
calculus and plaque, affected the immune 
response and decreasing gingival circulation (10) an 
agreement with our results reported by Sabrina (11) 
and villa (12). 

   Oral protozoa T. tenax showed higher 
prevalence (56.89%) in patients of this study than 
other published reports (13,14). Worldwide, the 
prevalence ranges from 4.0 to 53% (15).The rezone 
for this higher prevalence might be related to 
different diagnosis methods and periods of study 
.In Brazil a study documented  The prevalence of 
T. tenax was 23.53% (16). Also Ahmed (17) 
examined 33 gingivitis case and recorded the 
prevalence rate 14.2%.Another study showed that 
from 30 gingivitis case, T. tenax was observed in 
saliva samples 46.6% while in dental plaque 
samples 30%(18). In this study, out of 58 healthy 
patients , observation of T. tenax was in 4 
(6.89%). usually, healthy oral cavity did not 
provide favorable anaerobic conditions for the 
growth and survival of the parasite (19).A 
relationship has been demonstrated between the 
occurrence of T.tenax and gingivitis disease (15). 

 According to gender, data revealed that 33 of 
58(56.89%) patients with gingivitis showed the 
presence of T. tenax. Males recorded higher 
prevalence than females (62.85%, 47.82% 

respectively)which indicated the similarity with 
other studies, this could be due to physiological 
and immunological condition. In America, a study 
on American population showed males were 
affected more as compared to females 
significantly higher (P<0.001) than the females 
(20). Another study was found that the prevalence 
of T. tenax was 53% in males and in females was 
(47%) (8). 

According to age, the higher prevalence of T. 
tenax was detected in age group51-60 years old 
(92.8%)where persons of this group might have 
less careful about oral  hygienic Behaviors  such 
as smoking, un-brushing teeth also immunologic 
level might play a role. Similar finding was 
observed and explained that there is a direct 
correlation between age and oral protozoan (13,21-
23). 

According to the effect of brushing teeth on 
the prevalence of T. tenax, data showed that 
higher prevalence recorded in non-brushing teeth 
persons 29.1% while 11.9 was the rate of 
infection in brushing teeth persons, these results 
improved oral hygiene might be effective in 
elimination the infection. These results were 
compatible with other researches (24). 
 
REFERENCES 
1. GhAravi MJ. The text book of Clinical Protozoalogy 

3rd ed. eimoorzadehpubl; 2004. 308- 69. 
2. Chinche L,  Donati S,  Corno G,  Benoit S and Granier 

I,  Chouraki M. Trichomonas tenax in pulmonary and 
pleural diseases. Presse Med 2005; 34: 1371-72. 

3. Brooks GF, Carroll KC, Butel JS, Morse SA.  Jawetz, 
Melnick and Adelberg’s Medical Microbiology. 24th 
ed. The McGrw Hill Companies: 2007: 661-2.  

4. Navazesh M. Methods for collecting saliva. Ann N Y 
Acad Sci 1993; 694: 72-7. 

5. Bafghi AF, Aflatoonian A, BarzegarB,  Ghafourzadeh 
M,  Nabipour  S. Frequency distribution of 
trichomoniasis in pregnant women referred to health 
centers of Ardakan, Meibod and Yazd, Iran. 
Jundishapur J Microbiol 2009; 2(4): 132-9.  

6. Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW. 
Periodontal diseases. Lancet 2005; 366(9499): 1809-
20. 

7. Khansa TA, Zafer M F, Yousef SK.Prevalence and 
risk indicators of gingivitis and periodontitis in a 
Multi-Centre study in North Jordan: a cross sectional 
study.BMC Oral Health 2012; 12:1 

8. Sarah A, Nomaan N, Abida M, Ulfat B. Prevalence of 
Gingivitis in Patients Visiting Islamic International 



J Bagh College Dentistry                  Vol. 28(1), March 2016                            The prevalence   
  

Basic Sciences                                                   182 
 

Dental Hospital. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci 2012; 8(2): 
150-2. 

9. BaelumV, Fejerskov O, Karring T. Oral hygiene, 
gingivitis and periodontal breakdown in adult 
Tanzanians. J Periodontal Res 1968; 21:221-32. 

10. Linden GJ, Mullally BH. Cigarette smoking and 
periodontal destruction in young adults. Journal of 
Periodontol 1994; 65: 718-23. 

11. Sabrina CG, Flávia BP, Rui VO, Cristiano SR, 
Adriana CM. The effect of smoking on gingival 
crevicular fluid volume during the treatment of 
gingivitis. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2009; 22(3): 201-6 

12. Villa CC, Matorelli AF. Smoking influences on the 
thickness of marginal epithelium. Pesqui Odontol Bras 
2003; 17: 41-5. 

13. Vrablic J, Tomova S, Cattar G, Randova L, Suttova S. 
Morphology and diagnosis of Entamoebagingivalisand 
Trichomonastenaxand their occurrence in children and 
adolescents. Bratisl LekListy 1991; 92(5): 241-6. 

14. Sarowska J, Wojnicz D, KaczkowskiH,Jankowski S. 
The occurrence of Entamoebagingivalis and 
Trichomonas tenax in patients with periodontal 
disease. Adv Clin Exp Med 2004; 13(2): 291-7. 

15. Athari A, Soghandi L, Haghighi A, Kazemi B. 
Prevalence of oral trichomoniasis` in patients with 
periodontitis and gingivitis using pcr and direct smear. 
Iranian J Publ Health 2007; 36(3): 33-7. 

16. Ricardo LC, Cláudia MM, WagnoAS,Juliana LR, 
Flávia AS.  RGO - Rev GaúchaOdontol., Porto Alegre 
2011; 59(1):35-40. 

17. Ahmed KAH, Mahdi YK, Youniss AK. Prevalence of 
oral protozoa in periodontitis and gingivitis patients 

whose attended to clinics periodontics, dentistry 
college\ Babylon university. J Kufa University for 
Biol 2011; 3(1):1-7. 

18. Sumaiah I, Rasha A. Evaluation of 
Entamoebagingivalis and Trichomonas tenaxin 
patients with periodontitis and gingivitis and its 
correlation with some risk factors. J Bagh College 
Dentistry 2012; 24(3):158-162. 

19. Abramova EI ,Voskresenskaya GA. Role played by 
oral Trichomonas in the pathogenesis of periodontal 
disease. Stomatol (Mosk) 1980; 59: 28-30. 

20. Li Y, Lee S, Hujoel P, Su M, Zhang W, Kim J, Zhang 
YP, DeVizio W. Prevalence and severity of gingivitis 
in American adults. Am J Dent 2010; 23(1): 9-13. 

21. Van winkellhoff AJ, Bosch-tihofCj, Winkel EG. 
Correlation Identification of oral Protozoa dentes 
2001; 73(6):13-29. 

22. Nagwa MES, Eman MHM. Detection of Trichomonas 
tenax in patients with periodontitis using microscopy 
and culture compared to PCR. Egypt J M Sci 2008; 29 
(1-2): 537-550 

23. Jawad SQ. Frequency of Entamoebagingivalis and 
Trichomonas tenax among patients with dental 
prosthesis-fixed or removable. J of College of Basic 
Education 2011; 68:97-100. 

24. Saadia SH, Sanaa HM, Mohammad AK. Relationship 
between the Dental health and prevalence's 
Trichomonas tenax and Entamoebagingivalis among 
patients attending Dental Clinics in Kirkuk. J Babylon 
University/Pure and Applied Sciences 2012; 20(5): 
1441-7.