J Bagh College Dentistry Vol. 32(1), March 2020 The impact of dental 35 The impact of dental environment stress on caries experience, salivary flow rate and uric acid Raghad Ibrahim Kadhum (1), Alhan Ahmed Qasim (2) ABSTRACT Background: Several pathologies of the oral cavity have been associated with stress. Dental students need to gain assorted proficiencies as theoretical knowledge, clinical proficiencies, and interpersonal dexterity which is accompanied with high level of stress. Uric acid is the major antioxidant in saliva. The aim of this study is to assess the dental caries experience among dental students with different levels of dental environment stress in relation to physicochemical characteristics of whole unstimulated saliva. Materials and Methods: the total sample is composed of 300 dental students (73 males, 227 female) aged 22-23 years old, from collage of dentistry / university of Baghdad, from the 4th and 5th grade. The total sample was classified into three categories (mild stress, moderate stress and severe stress) according to Dental environment stress questionnaire (DESQ); Diagnosis and recording of dental caries were assessed according to Decay, Missed, Filled surface and teeth index (DMFS, DMFT) of WHO criteria in 1987. Unstimulated salivary samples were collected from the 95 dental students from the mild stress group (27 male, 28 female) and from the severe stress group (11 male, 29 female). Then, salivary flow rate was measured and chemically analyzed to determine salivary uric acid concentration. All data were analyzed using statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 21. Results: The mean value of the DMFT and DS fraction was higher among severe stress group of dental environment stress scale with no significant differences (P≥ 0.05), while DMFS, FS and MS fractions were higher among moderate stress group of dental environment stress scale with no significant differences (P≥ 0.05). The data from salivary analysis showed that the mean value of salivary flow rate was lower among severe dental environment stress category than mild dental environment stress category but the difference was statistically not significant, while the mean value of uric acid was higher among students with severe dental environment stress than students with mild dental environment stress with statistically significant difference. The flow rate was negatively correlated with caries experience among both mild and severe stress groups except for the DS was positively correlated with flow rate among students with mild stress. The correlation of uric acid with DMFT was negative among students with mild stress while among severe stress group was positive; however all these correlations were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Dental environment stress appears to affect oral health, shown by higher caries prevalence among dental students with moderate and severe dental environment stress level by affecting the normal level of salivary flow rate and uric acid. Keywords: Dental environment stress, stress, dental caries, flow rate, uric acid. (Received: 15/12/2019; Accepted: 23/1/2020) INTRODUCTION Most of the stress definitions emphasize stress as any factor that menaces the wellbeing of an individual or cause adverse effects on the body functions.(1) The central nervous system (CNS) reacts to stress; this reaction involves different morphological and neurochemical alterations, among them, oxidative stress.(2) Oxidative stress consists of an imbalance between the amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the capability of antioxidant systems to equalize them.(3) Stressors are known as the causes of stress, they could be emotional or physical, in addition, they could be internally or externally generated. (1) M.Sc. Student, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad. (2) Assist. Professor, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad. The stressors are categorized as: A) Exogenous or outer stressors. B) Endogenous or inner stressors. C) The formation of stress is also caused by the combination of exogenous and endogenous influences.(4) D) System induced stress is a kind of stress that is distinguished by psychologists. System is related to association such as schools, family, offices, and any other social structures, in which a person is dealt with.(5) Dentistry is known as a very stressful occupation and dental education is involved as being a stressful education environment because the dental occupation demands interpersonal dexterity and clinical competencies as well as theoretical knowledge.(6) This stress can result in physical and psychological distress, which in turn can affect the health and performance of the student.(7-8) The main sources of stress among dental students include the education environment, apprehension of fail, hardness in dealing with patients, clinical requirements, hardness in dealing with transitions in curriculum and difficult relationships with academic staff.(9) J Bagh College Dentistry Vol. 32(1), March 2020 The impact of dental 36 Dental caries is a complex, chronic, multifactorial disease and one of the most prevalent diseases in industrialized and developing countries.(10) When the individual is exposed to stressful event, the psychological reaction to this event activates the sympathetic nervous system and the hypothalamic- pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis, causing the secretion of elevated amount of stress hormones, primarily cortisol and catecholamine, which causes decrease in salivary flow and in this manner changes salivary capability with regards to oxidation reduction.(11-12) The reduction in salivary flow decreases the defensive actions created by saliva and, as a result, raising the hazard for dental caries.(13-14) It was proposed that persons with psychological disturbance were more susceptible to bad caries state, which is because of a variety of causes such as self- negligence.(15) The severity of the psychological stress diminishes in the capability to understand the complications of poor oral health, poor attention of oral hygiene, and illogical fear from dental therapy.(16-18) Another study found that there is no relation between stress and salivary flow rate.(19-20) The major anti-oxidant of the saliva is the uric acid. The first defense mechanism against oxidative stress due to free radicals is the anti-oxidants present in the saliva.(21-23) The disequilibrium in concentrations of free radicals (reactive oxygen species) and antioxidants in saliva may have an important action in the initiation and progression of dental caries.(24) Several studies found that the adherence capacity of some bacteria may be modulated via the antioxidant capacity of their environment.(25-26) Therefore, the increase in the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of saliva could cause changes in the Streptococcus adherence to the dental plaque, leading to maximal cariogenic action.(27) Results of studies on the relation between uric acid concentration and caries experience were controversial. Therefore the mean goal of this study was to determine the dental caries experience among different stress levels of dental students and to conduct an evaluation of its relation with salivary uric acid and flow rate. The null hypothesis was that there is no relation between salivary uric acid and flow rate with the development of dental caries experience among different stress levels of dental students. MATERIALS AND METHODS The total sample is composed of 300 dental students (73 males, 227 female) aged 22-23 years old, from College of Dentistry/ University of Baghdad, from the 4th and 5th grad. Dental environment stress was recorded for all dental students by means of self- recorded questionnaire using dental environment stress questionnaire (DESQ).(28) This is a specific scale designed to measure the stress of dental students which consisted of (24) items, for each event 5 alternatives (very stressful, stressful, moderately stressful, not stressful, and not stressful at all), so the students have to answer for each event by choosing one of these alternatives. This questionnaire was adopted from other studies. The scale validity and reliability were checked. Caries experience was diagnosed according to Decay, Missed, Filled surface and teeth index DMFS/DMFT of WHO.(29) For salivary analysis, a sub-sample of 95 students was taken. The collections of unstimulated saliva were performed under standard condition according to the University of Southern California School of Dentistry guidelines for saliva collection.(30) The collected saliva sample was poured directly after being collected in a graduated test tube to determine the volume collected through the 5 minutes period. The salivary flow rate was calculated by dividing the volume of collected saliva in milliliter (ml) by the time required for collection in minute (min), Flow rate (ml/min) = Volume (ml)/ Time (min).(31) After the collection of saliva, each salivary sample was centrifuged (at 2000-3000 rpm) for approximately 20 minutes. Salivary uric acid was determined colorimetrically by using the spectrophotometer and ready kit (Agappe kit /Switzerland). This method allows the determination of uric acid by reaction with uricase. Uricase transforms uric acid into allantoin, with formation of hydrogen peroxide, and produces a violet colored complex whose color intensity is directly proportional to the uric acid concentration in the sample. Data processing; analysis and description were performed by the use of (Statistical Package for Social Science SPSS version 21), Frequency and percentage were used for qualitative variable, while mean and standard error were used for quantitative variable. RESULTS Tables (1 and 2) illustrate the caries experience (DMFT, DMFS and its components DS, MS and FS) among dental students according to dental environment stress levels for the total sample. The mean value of DMFT and DS fraction was higher among severe stress level with statistically non- significant difference (P≥0.05), while DMFS, FS and MS fractions were higher among moderate stress level with statistically non-significant difference (P≥0.05). Table (3) demonstrates the mean value of salivary flow rate and uric acid. The mean value of J Bagh College Dentistry Vol. 32(1), March 2020 The impact of dental 37 flow rate was lower among severe dental environment stress category than mild dental environment stress category, statistically the difference was not significant (P≥0.05), while the mean value of salivary uric acid was higher among severe dental environment stress category than mild dental environment stress category with statistically significant difference (P< 0.05). Table (4) demonstrates the correlation between salivary physicochemical characteristics and dental caries. The caries experience caries (DMFT, DMFS and its components DS, MS and FS) were negatively correlated with flow rate among students with mild dental environment stress except for the DS and positively correlated with flow rate; while among the student with severe dental environment stress there was negative correlation between the caries experience and flow rate. There were negative correlations between uric acid and caries experience except for the MS and FS which were positively correlated with uric acid among students with mild dental environment stress; while among students with severe dental environment stress the caries experience were positively correlated with uric acid except for DS and MS which were negatively correlated with uric acid, however all these correlations were statistically not-significant (P≥ 0.05). Table 1: Caries experience (DMFT, DMFS) of dental students according to dental environment stress levels Table 2: Caries experience (DMFs and its components DS, MS and FS) of dental students according to dental environment stress levels Table 3: Salivary physicochemical characteristics among dental students of mild and severe dental environment stress Variable Stress level N Mean SE F P-value DMFS Mild 83 9.37 0.899 0.087 0.916 Moderate 141 9.84 0.753 Severe 76 9.72 0.756 DMFT Mild 83 5.30 0.438 0.461 0.631 Moderate 141 5.46 0.347 Severe 76 5.88 0.412 Variable Stress level N Mean SE F P-value DS Mild 83 3.33 0.390 0.748 0.474 Moderate 141 2.89 0.253 Severe 76 3.38 0.411 MS Mild 83 1.02 0.268 1.079 0.341 Moderate 141 1.24 0.226 Severe 76 0.72 0.243 FS Mild 83 5.02 0.685 0.308 0.735 Moderate 141 5.72 0.626 Severe 76 5.63 0.612 Variable Stress level Statistical test Mild Severe N Mean SD N Mean SD T-test df P-value Flow rate ml/min 55 0.804 0.358 40 0.715 0.282 1.299 93 0.197 Uric acid mg/dL 55 5.142 1.706 40 6.059 2.485 2.134 93 0.035 J Bagh College Dentistry Vol. 32(1), March 2020 The impact of dental 38 Table 4: Correlation coefficient of caries experience (DMFT, DMFS and its components DS, MS and FS) with salivary physicochemical characteristics according to dental environment stress levels Correlations Stress level DS MS FS DMFS DMFT Mild Flow rate ml/min r 0.002 -0.179 -0.056 -0.110 -0.076 P 0.989 0.191 0.684 0.424 0.583 Uric acid mg/dL r -0.111 0.000 0.035 -0.035 -0.075 P 0.418 0.999 0.798 0.799 0.586 Severe Flow rate ml/min r -0.049 -0.074 -0.011 -0.003 -0.018 P 0.764 0.650 0.948 0.983 0.913 Uric acid mg/dL r -0.147 -0.088 0.001 0.004 0.018 P 0.365 0.588 0.996 0.978 0.914 DISCUSSION The defensive elements of saliva and the relationship between oral diseases and psy-chological components were taken into consideration. It is surprising how minimal psychological stress can adjust the safeguard element in saliva. In this study the dental caries was higher among severe dental environment stress category than other categories, the increase of dental caries occurrence with increased stressful situation agrees with other studies.(32-33) This might be because of affecting the immunity and weakening the host defense to cariogenic bacteria (34), by the increase of the secretion of catecholamines and corticosteroids in serum and saliva. The cortisol level of the body increases during stress producing acid creating a favourable environment for bacteria,(35) by unhealthy meals eating prompting frequent snacking and increase the intake of sugar rich diet,(36-35) by weakening the execution of self-care behavior (flossing teeth, brushing teeth) prompting poor oral cleanliness making great condition for microbes,(37) by diminishing salivary flow prompting diminished removal of cariogenic bacteria subjective oral dryness and unstimulated salivary flow were connected with stress to decrease the protective functions of saliva, increasing the vulnerability to dental caries.(20,38-39) Although a lower unstimulated salivary flow rate was found in the severe stress group, this difference did not reach statistical significance; the same result was found by other studies.(20,40-41) This is because anxiety and fear may influence salivary flow through pathways in the amygdala, the hypothalamus, and the brainstem.(42) The salivary flow rate was negatively correlated with caries experience among students with severe stress level and this agrees with other studies.(43-45) This may be because of the important action of salivary flow rate as washing action and the defensive components of saliva increase with increasing salivary flow rate,(44) while among mild stress category the flow rate was positively correlated with DS; this agree with other studies.(20) This may be due to higher flow rate; the flow rate may have little effect on the activity of caries at a specific point in time and determination of salivary flow rate at one-time may not be thorough estimation of salivary flow actions.(46) In this study the uric acid was significantly higher among students with severe dental environment stress than those with mild dental environment stress; the same result was found by other studies.(39) Antioxidant one of the protection components against oxidative stress is available in all body liquids and tissues, Uric acid is the major anti-oxidant of the saliva which comprises more than 85% of saliva total antioxidant capacity (TAC) which may be increased as a protection mechanism during stress,(23,46-47) or maybe the adaptive response to a long dated expanded oxidative stress can result in high antioxidant of saliva,(48) or might be because of a significant number of the constituents of saliva changes with flow rate and as the flow rate declines during stress so the antioxidant may be increased for this cause.(49) Goodman found that with activation of hippocampal during stress uric acid level increased.(50) The data of present current study found that uric acid was weak and negatively correlated with dental caries; the same result was found by other studies.(23,51-52) This may be due to enhanced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the presence of bacteria by increased activity of neutrophils and monocytes in the oral cavity during phagocytosis.(23) In contrast, other studies(53) found positive correlation between TAC and dental caries and explained that a raise in total antioxidant capability of saliva could create alterations in the adherence of Streptococcus to the dental plaque and lead to more cariogenic action. In evaluating caries risk the determining of single salivary antibacterial component is not significant.(54) Therefore, further experimental and J Bagh College Dentistry Vol. 32(1), March 2020 The impact of dental 39 clinical studies are required for progress to estimate the anticarious activity of uric acid. CONCLUSION The results of this study maintain that the salivary flow rate and uric acid may serve as a biomarker of stress, which affects the oral health as showed by the higher dental caries among dental students with severe dental environment stress. REFERENCES 1. Martin EA, editor. Concise medical dictionary. Oxford Quick Reference, 1985. 2. Sorce S, Krause KH. NOX enzymes in the central nervous system: from signaling to disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11:2481-2504. 3. Schiavone S, Jaquet V, Trabace L, Krause KH. Severe life stress and oxidative stress in the brain: from animal models to human pathology. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;18:1475-1490. 4. Holahan CJ, Moos RH, Holahan CK, Cronkite RC. Long- term post-treatment functioning among patients with unipolar depression: An integrative model. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:226-232. 5. Holahan CJ. Environmental psychology. Ann Review Psychol. 1986;37:381-407. 6. Polychronopoulou A, Divaris K. Dental students’ perceived sources of stress: a multi-country study. J Dent Ed. 2009;73:631-639. 7. Cecchini JJ, Friedman N. First-year dental students: relationship between stress and performance. Int J Psychosom. 1987;34:17-19. 8. Westerman GH, Grandy TG, Lupo JV, Mitchell RE. Relationship of stress and performance among first-year dental students. J Dent Ed. 1986;50:264-267. 9. Gordon NA, Rayner CA, Wilson VJ, Crombie K, Shaikh AB, Yasin-Harnekar S. Perceived stressors of oral hygiene students in the dental environment. Af J Health Prof Ed. 2016;8:20-24. 10. Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century. The approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;37:1-8. 11. Petersen PE. Sociobehavioural risk factors in dental caries–international perspectives. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005;33:274-279. 12. Dhabhar FS. Enhancing versus suppressive effects of stress on immune function: implications for immunoprotection and immunopathology. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2009;16:300-317. 13. Segerstrom SC, Miller GE. Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychol Bull. 2004;130:601-630. 14. McEwen BS, Gianaros PJ. Central role of the brain in stress and adaptation: links to socioeconomic status, health, and disease. Ann New York Academy Sci. 2010; 1186:190-222. 15. Lewis S, Jagger RG, Treasure E. The oral health of psychiatric in‐patients in South Wales. Spec Care Dent. 2001;21:182-186. 16. Stevens T, Spoors J, Hale R, Bembridge H. Perceived oral health needs in psychiatric in-patients: impact of a dedicated dental clinic. Psychiat. 2010; 34:518-521. 17. Clifton A, Tosh G, Khokhar W, Jones H, Wells N. Oral health advice for people with serious mental illness. Schizophr Bull. 2011;37:464-465. 18. Kebede B, Kemal T, Abera S. Oral health status of patients with mental disorders in southwest Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39142. 19. Naumova EA, Sandulescu T, Al Khatib P, Thie M, Lee WK, Zimmer S, Arnold WH. Acute short-term mental stress does not influence salivary flow rate dynamics. PloS one. 2012;7:e51323. 20. Abdul-Ameer AK, Radhi NJ, Abdul-Ghani HJ. Stressful life events in relation to dental caries and selected salivary constituents among secondary school students in Baghdad City. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2017;29:139-147. 21. Shetty VA, Kumari S, Darshana GA, Sneha N. Influence of the total antioxidant content of saliva on dental caries. NUJHS. 2011;l:19-21. 22. Hegde AM, Raj K, Shetty S. Relation of caries status on the salivary total antioxidant levels in asthmatic children. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012;3:402-405. 23. Rahmani M, Ghoorchi V, Rezaei F, Raygani AV. Evaluation of total antioxidant capacity of saliva in high school students. Global J health Sci. 2016;8:89-94. 24. Gopinath VK, Arzreanne AR. Saliva as a diagnostic tool for assessment of dental caries. Arch Orofacial Sci. 2006;1:57-59. 25. Uberos J, Augustin C, LieÂbana J, Molina A, MunÄoz- Hoyos A. Comparative study of the influence of melatonin and vitamin E on the surface characteristics. Lett App Microb. 2001;32:303-306. 26. Uberos J, Molina-Carballo A, Galdo-Muñoz G, Muñoz- Hoyos A. Total antioxidant capacity of plasma in asymptomatic carrier state of Neisseria meningitidis. Epidemiol Infec. 2007;135:857-860. 27. Uberos J, Alarcón JA, Peñalver MA, Molina-Carballo A, Ruiz M, González E, Muñoz-Hoyos A. Influence of the antioxidant content of saliva on dental caries in an at-risk community. Br Dent J. 2008;205:5. 28. Al-Sowygh ZH, Alfadley AA, Al-Saif MI, Al-Wadei SH. Perceived causes of stress among Saudi dental students. King Saud Univ J Dent Sci. 2013;4:7-15. 29. World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. World Health Organization. 2013. 30. Navazesh M, Kumar SK. Measuring salivary flow: challenges and opportunities. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:35S-40S. 31. Rantonen P. Salivary flow and composition in healthy and diseased adults. 2003. 32. Bosch JA, Brand HS, Ligtenberg TJ, Bermond B, Hoogstraten J, Amerongen AVN. Psychological stress as a determinant of protein levels and salivary-induced aggregation of Streptococcus gordonii in human whole saliva. Psychosom Med. 1996;58:374-382. J Bagh College Dentistry Vol. 32(1), March 2020 The impact of dental 40 33. Mejía‐Rubalcava C, Alanís‐Tavira J, Argueta‐Figueroa L, Legorreta‐Reyna A. Academic stress as a risk factor for dental caries. Int Dent J. 2012;62:127-131. 34. Beck JD, Kohout FJ, Hunt RJ, Heckert DA. Root caries: physical, medical and psychosocial correlates in an elderly population. Gerodontics. 1987;3:242-247. 35. Jain M, Singh A, Sharma A. Relationship of perceived stress and dental caries among pre university students in Bangalore City. J Clin Diag Res. 2014;8:131. 36. Oaten M, Cheng K. Academic examination stress impairs self–control. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2005;24:254-279. 37. Bergdahl M, Bergdahl J. Low unstimulated salivary flow and subjective oral dryness: association with medication, anxiety, depression, and stress. J Dent Res. 2000;79,1652- 1658. 38. Hugo FN, Hilgert JB, Corso S, Padilha DMP, Bozzetti MC, Bandeira DR, Gonçalves TR. Association of chronic stress, depression symptoms and cortisol with low saliva flow in a sample of south‐Brazilians aged 50 years and older. Gerodontology. 2008;25:18-25. 39. Tawfik NO, Isra'a H, Al-Nuaimy KM. Effect of Stress on the Composition and Flow Rate of Saliva. Al-Rafid Dent J. 2012;15:66-70. 40. El-Samarrai S, Al-Rawi N. Salivary physicochemical properties in relation to caries-experience among type 1 insulin-dependent diabetic children. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2010;22:113-117. 41. Proctor GB. The physiology of salivary secretion. Periodontology 2000. 2016;70:11-25. 42. Al-Sekab HF, Diab BS. Dental caries and salivary physiochemical characteristics among osteoporotic old adult women. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2014;325:1-7. 43. Thaweboon S, Thaweboon B, Nakornchai S, Jitmaitree S. Salivary secretory IgA, pH, flow rates, mutans streptococci and Candida in children with rampant caries. South Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2008;39:893-899. 44. Stookey GK. The effect of saliva on dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:11S-17S. 45- Khiala HS, Diab BS. Depression Status in Relation to Caries Experience and Salivary Physiochemical Characteristics among 15 Years Old Students in Al-Swera City-Wassit Governorate-Iraq. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2015;325:1-11. 46. Halliwell B. Reactive oxygen species in living systems: source, biochemistry, and role in human disease. Am J Med. 1991;91:S14-S22. 47. Kamodyová N, Červenka T, Celec P. Salivary markers of oxidative stress in oral diseases. Frontiers Cell Infec Microb. 2015;5:73. 48. Mason DK, Boyle JA, Harden RM, Duncan AM, Greig WR. The influence of flow rate on the concentration of uric acid in human parotid and submandibular saliva. J Dent Res. 1966;45:1439-1444. 49. Goodman AM, Wheelock MD, Harnett NG, Mrug S, Granger DA, Knight DC. The hippocampal response to psychosocial stress varies with salivary uric acid level. Neuroscience. 2016;339:396-401. 50. Krawczyk D, Sikorska-Jaroszyńska MHJ, Mielnik- Błaszczak M, Pasternak K, Kapeć E, Sztanke M. Dental caries and total antioxidant status of unstimulated mixed whole saliva in patients aged 16–23 years. Ad Med Sci. 2012;57:163-168. 51. Dodwad R, Betigeri AV, Preeti BP. Estimation of total antioxidant capacity levels in saliva of caries-free and caries-active children. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011;2:17-20. 52. Krawczyk D, Blaszczak J, Borowicz J, Mielnik-Blaszczak M. Life style and risk of development of dental caries in a population of adolescents. Ann Agric Environmen Med. 2014; 21:576-580. 53. Mahjoub S, Ghasempour M, Gharage A, Bijani A, Masrourroudsari J. Comparison of total antioxidant capacity in saliva of children with severe early childhood caries and caries-free children. Caries Res. 2014;48:271-275. 54. Kirstilä V, Häkkinen P, Jentsch H, Vilja P, Tenovuo J. Longitudinal analysis of the association of human salivary antimicrobial agents with caries increment and cariogenic micro-organisms: a two-year cohort study. J Dent Res. 1998;77:73-80. الخالصة : معرفة نظرية, مهارات مثل طالب كلية طب االسنان يحتاجون الى اكتساب الكفاءات المتنوعة من امراض الفم تكون مصاحبة للضغط.العديد الخلفية: . حمض اليوريك هو مضاد االكسدة الرئيسي في اللعاب. من الضغط والتي تكون مصحوبة بمستوى عال سريرية, وخبرة في العالقات الشخصية ن ان تعادل التأثير القاتل للجراثيم للجزيئات التي تحفز الضغط التأكسدي الموجودة في اللعاب الكميات الكبيرة من مضادات االكسدة اللعابية من الممك صفيحة الجرثومية, وبذلك تدعم نمو تسوس االسنان.وال ن وعالقته الهدف من هذه الدراسة هو تقييم تسوس االسنان لطالب كلية طب االسنان لديهم مستويات مختلفة من الضغط الناجم عن بيئة طب االسنا كيميائية للعاب الغير محفز. -بالخصائص الفزيو ( عام, الذين تم اختيارهم من كلية 23-22اناث( اعمارهم تتراوح بين )227ذكور, 73طالب طب اسنان ) 300مواد وطرق البحث: العينة الكلية كانت مقياس الضغط لبيئة طب االسنان الى ثالثة اقسام )ضغوط طب االسنان/جامعة بغداد. حيث تم اختيارهم من المرحلة الرابعة والخامسة, تم تصنيفهم وفق سنان باستخدام مؤشر االسنان وسطوح االسنان المفقودة والمعالجة والمتسوسة قليلة, ضغوط متوسطة, ضغوط شديدة(. تم تشخيص وتسجيل تسوس اال (DMFT, DMFS )وفقا لمعاييرWHO. 28ذكور, 27) طالب من الذين لديهم مستوى ضغوط قليلة 95من تم جمعها عينات اللعاب الغير محفز . وتم وتحليلها كيميائيا لتحديد تركيز حمض اليوريك اللعابي تدفق العابنسبة لتقييم اناث( 29ذكور, 11)والذين لديهم مستوى ضغوط شديدة اناث( . 21النسخة SPSSتحليل جميع البيانات باستخدام برنامج ( كان لدى الذين لديهم ضغوط شديدة من مقياس الضغط لبيئة طب االسنان مع عدم DSوللجزء ) DMFT)النتائج: اظهرت النتائج ان قيمة متوسط ل ) ≤P)( كانت اعلى لدى الذين لديهم ضغط متوسط مع عدم وجود اختالفات معنوية DMFS, FS, MS, بينما )(P≥ 0.05)وجود اختالفات معنوية J Bagh College Dentistry Vol. 32(1), March 2020 The impact of dental 41 اظهرت نتائج تحليل اللعاب ان تدفق اللعاب كان اعلى لدى مجموعة الضغط القليل من مجموعة الضغط الشديد مع عدم وجود اختالفات معنوية, .(0.05 الطالب الذين لديهم مجموعة مع تسوس االسنان لدى كانت عالقته سالبة تدفق اللعاب .الضغط الشديد كان اعلى لدى مجموعة حمض اليوريكبينما مع تدفق اللعاب كانت موجبة لدى طالب الصغط القليل. عالقة حمض اليوريك مع ال DSوالذين لديهم ضغوط شديدة ماعدا عالقة ال وط قليلةضغ DMFT العالقات كانت احصائيا غير , مع ذلك كل هذه كانت سالبة لدى طالب الضغط القليل, بينما طالب الضغط الشديد كانت هذه العالقة موجبة معنوية. الذين لديهم الفم, شوهدت باالنتشار االعلى لتسوس االسنان لدى طالب طب االسنانله تأثير على صحة يبدو ان ضغط بيئة طب االسنان االستنتاج: ضغوط متوسطة وشديدة وذلك بتأثيره على المستويات الطبيعية لتدفق اللعاب وحمض اليوريك. االسنان, الضغط, تسوس االسنان, تدفق اللعاب, حمض اليوريك. ضغط بيئة طب :المفتاحية الكلمات