12 
  

J Bagh College Dentistry              Vol. 33(1), March 2021              Prevalence of self-reported 

Prevalence of self-reported halitosis and associated 

factors in 15 years old male students in Karbala City-Iraq 

 
Rafal Abdulaziz Alawsiy (1), Nada Jafer MH. Radhi (2) 

https://doi.org/10.26477/jbcd.v33i1.2922 
ABSTRACT 
Background׃ Halitosis is a common condition and is most often caused by a buildup of bacteria in the mouth because of gum 

disease, food, or plaque. It can result in anxiety among those affected, it is also associated with depression and symptoms of 

obsessive-compulsive disorder. This study aims to assess the prevalence of self-reported halitosis and associated factors (dental 

plaque, gingival condition and dental caries) in 15 years old male students in Karbala city in Iraq. Additionally, we studied 
adolescents’ concern with their own breath and whether anyone had ever told them that they had halitosis. 

Methods׃ A cross-sectional observational survey was conducted to15 years old high school students from public and private 

schools in the city of Karbala, Iraq. The random sample consisted of 400 adolescents from 44 schools. An interview with a 

structured questionnaire was administered along with measurement of oral parameters (PI, GI, DMF). 

Results׃ The prevalence of self-reported halitosis was 48.50% according to question one. The prevalence of halitosis according to 

the total score of the questionnaire was 86.5%. 13.5% reported that they didn’t have halitosis. It is concluded that there is a high 

prevalence of self-reported halitosis, which is associated with a socio-economic pattern. Most adolescents report a concern with 

their own breath. Dental plaque and gingival status are associated significantly with self-reported halitosis. The high prevalence of 
self-reported halitosis according to the questionnaire among the students may be due to the consumption of garlic or spicy food, 

besides, dental plaque, gingivitis and dental caries cause an increase in volatile silver compound level which cause an increase in 

halitosis. 

Conclusion׃ Self-reported halitosis is a prevalent situation in about 50% of adolescents in Karbala city. Patients’ self -reported 
halitosis is found to be associated with dental plaque, gingivitis and dental caries. 
Keywords׃ Halitosis; adolescent; prevalence. (Received: 15/1/2021, Accepted: 24/2/2021) 

 

INTRODUCTION 
Halitosis is a state in which respired air is offensively 

changed both for patients and for people with whom 
they communicate (1). It distresses millions of people 
around the world, although its prevalence fluctuates, 

seemingly elicited by the shortage of oral hygiene 
and a disorganized lifestyle. It can cause social 

restrictions, interfere in the quality of life, and maybe 
a gauge of important systemic diseases. In most 
societies where halitosis is prevalent, people look for 

solutions, usually due to the discomfort or 
embarrassment to which they are subjected (2). 
One of the aims for studying halitosis is its social 

impact as a result of patients feeling unconfident in 
social, professional and family contacts. It may also 

affect the quality of life and cause embarrassment to 
people relating to the individual with bad breath. 
The measurement of volatile sulfur compound 

(VSC) concentrations in the exhaled air to assess 
halitosis is the only method used in some studies. 
 

 
 
 
 (1) Mater student, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive 

Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad. 

(2) Assistant professor, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive 

Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad. 

Corresponding email, nooraliomran88@gmail.com 

The results of these surveys have a different meaning 

from studies that determine the percentage of people 
who report having halitosis by a questionnaire (1). 
Both conclusions are meaningful to understanding 

the issue, but observation through VSC monitors is 
considered a surrogate conclusion (measure the 

disease route, and in general it is therapy centred) (3), 
whereas self-reported awareness of halitosis is 
documented as a true outcome. Epidemiological 

observation taking into consideration both types of 
outcomes provides important information and allows 
broader acceptance of the issue (1). 

Adolescence is the evolution period between 
childhood and adulthood and is categorized by 

several changes in biological, psychological and 
social development (4). Adolescents are subject to 
several health linked signs, including halitosis, 

which exceeds the biological scope, affecting the 
social scope and possibly hurting the physical and 
psychological health of affected individuals (5). 

Furthermore, the presence of halitosis may indicate 
incidence of important systemic diseases requiring 
crucial diagnosis and treatment. Nevertheless, in Iraq 

there are limited papers on adolescents, and still 
fewer on adolescent halitosis. 

 

 

 

https://doi.org/10.26477/jbcd.v33i1.2922
mailto:nooraliomran88@gmail.com


 
 
 

13 
  

J Bagh College Dentistry              Vol. 33(1), March 2021              Prevalence of self-reported 

MATERIALS AND METHODS 

Study design/study setting 
This study was a cross-sectional study that was 

carried out during the period between December 
2019 and February 2020. The survey was conducted 

among secondary schools in Karbala City-Iraq. The 
age was taken according to the criteria of the World 
Health Organization (1997) and according to the last 

birthday. The size of the sample composed of 400 
students who were randomly selected from 5477.  
❖ (The students with the systemic disease were 
excluded, besides, students in the study were free of: 
a) Medical history of infectious diseases. 
b) Malocclusion and draining fistulas associated 
with chronic alveolar abscesses. 
c) Usage of any chemical form of plaque control. 
d) Presence of crowding/overlapping of teeth. 
❖ The children were examined by the single 
calibrated examiner for the following clinical 

parameters: 

1. Self-reported halitosis by questionnaire. 
2. plaque by using the plaque index (PI) developed 
by Silness and Loe (1964) (6). 
3. Dental Gingival health—to check the gingival 
health of the subject, the gingival index (GI) 
developed by Loe and Silness (1963) (7) was used. 
4. Dental caries—decayed, missing, filled teeth 
index (DMF-T, DMF-S INDEX) (WHO 1987) for 
permanent teeth.  

 

Questionnaire 
A well-made format (questionnaire) was designed 
from previous studies (2,8,9,10) and administered to the 

students who meet the criteria The questionnaire was 
tested in a pilot study on 100 male students and 
validity and reliability was adopted, the 

questionnaire was adjusted in the light of pilot 
responses. The questionnaire was anonymous (no 
identification of an individual was possible). The 

questionnaire originally formulated in English, 
subsequently translated into Arabic and then 

retranslated into English, and ethical approval was 
achieved from the ethical committee in the college of 
dentistry and from the psychological department of 

the Faculty of Arts in Baghdad University. 

 

Statistical analysis 
Data were translated into a computerized database 
structure. An expert statistical counsel was sought. 

Data description, analysis and presentation were 
performed using Statistical Package for Social 

Science (SPSS version 21; Chicago, In Press, USA), 

sample size calculator for prevalence studies 

(version 1.0.01) done by Daniel WW, 1999. 
Statistical analyses can be classified into two 

categories:  
1-Descriptive Analysis: Frequencies and percentage 
for nominal variables, minimum, maximum, mean, 

standard deviation (SD) and Standard error (SE) for 
quantitative variable 
2- Inferential analysis: 

A. Independent sample T-test: test the difference 
between two independent groups. 
B. Paired sample t-test: test the difference between 

two related means for one sample or two raters. 
❖ Level of significance as Not Significant P>0.05, 
Significant P<0.05, highly significant P<0.01. 
 

RESULTS 
The prevalence of halitosis among 400 students aged 

15  years of male’s secondary schools in Karbala 
city/Iraq was 48.50% according to question one, as 
seen in the table (1). 
Regarding question one of the self-reported 
questionnaire of halitosis, as illustrated in Table 2, 

the mean value of plaque index and gingival index 
among students with halitosis is higher than those 
with no halitosis, which was statistically significant, 

(P<0.001). 
The findings of plaque index regarding the self-
reported questionnaire of halitosis were illustrated in 

Table (3), the mean values of plaque index among 
students with halitosis were higher than those 

without halitosis, the higher mean value was 
recorded in question (4), which was asking the 
students if their breath interfered with social life. 

These findings were statistically significant, 
(P<0.001). 
 Similarly, the mean value of the gingival 

index among students regarding the self-reported 
questionnaire of halitosis, was seemed to be higher 
in students with halitosis than without halitosis, 

(Table 4). The higher mean value was recorded in 
question (3), which was asking the students about 

receiving any professional treatment for halitosis. 
This finding were statistically significant, (P<0.001). 
However, the last question (Q7), which asked the 

students If they take any measures against halitosis, 
the difference observed failed to reach the level of 
statistical significance (P>0.05). 

 

 

 

 

 



 
 
 

14 
  

J Bagh College Dentistry              Vol. 33(1), March 2021              Prevalence of self-reported 

Table (1): Distribution of students by 

questionnaire. 

Question No. Percent % 

Q1 Yes 194 48.50 

NO 206 51.50 

Q2 Yes 188 47.00 

NO 212 53.00 

Q3 Yes 87 21.75 

NO 313 78.25 

Q4 Yes 162 40.50 

NO 238 59.50 

Q5 Yes 190 47.50 

NO 210 52.50 

Q6 Yes 217 54.25 

NO 183 45.75 

Q7 Yes 179 44.75 

NO 221 55.25 

 

Table (4) clarifies the mean values and standard 
errors (SE) of the caries-experience (DS, MS, FS, 

DMFS and DMFT) regarding the self-reported 
questionnaire of halitosis. the mean differences of 
DMFT were statistically significant concerning 

questions (2,4,5,6,7), similarly the mean differences 
of DS were statistically significant concerning 
questions (4,5,6), likewise the FS mean differences 

were statistically significant concerning question (5), 
and the mean differences of DMFS were statistically 
significant concerning question (5,6,7) (P< 0.001). 

On the other hand, other findings were statistically 
not significant (P> 0.05). 

 

DISCUSSION 
In the present study, 400 students of 5477 aged 15 

years old were selected randomly from 44 males’ 
secondary schools in Karbala city/Iraq, to measure 
the prevalence of self-perceived halitosis in 

secondary schools’ students aged 15 years, as no 
previous Iraqi study on halitosis was done in this area 

for this age. The selected student was interviewed in 
an isolated room in each school to ensure privacy and 

to avoid embarrassment while answering the 

questionnaire, and all the oral parameters including 
dental plaque, gingival condition and dental caries. 

Plaque Index of Silness and Löe (1964) (6) and 
Gingival Index of Löe and Silness (1963) (7) were 
used to assess dental plaque and gingival health 

condition, respectively. These indices were used due 
to their flexibility, which provides the possibility of 
selection of index teeth for examination rather than 

the whole dentition and keeps the duration of 
examination to a minimum; in addition to their ease 
of application (11). 

The age and gender were stationary, as age was not a 
risk factor for the increase in the level of VSCs (12). 

Multiple regression analysis revealed that male 
gender was the only variable showing a significant 
relationship with higher questionnaire scores. These 

findings corroborate previous studies showing the 
predominance of halitosis in male children aged 6-9 
years, 6 -16 years (13), and 7 - 15 years (14). However, 

a study carried out in Israel (15), showed no difference 
between the sexes in the 5 -14 age group, nor was 

there a difference in the adult population (9). 
However, some studies have found a higher 
prevalence of halitosis in women (16). It is difficult to 

determine the actual influence of factors such as age 
and gender on halitosis, since breath odor may be 
influenced by many factors such as periodontal and 

dental status, dental hygiene, tongue coating, 
smoking, nutrition, level of education, and 

medication (17). 
Self-assessment or self-perception of halitosis is a 
highly relevant outcome since it involves the 

individual in the process and makes him/her 
understand the importance of the condition (18). it is 
safe to assume self-perception as a true patient-

centered outcome, which is highly recommended in 
present research in the health field6. In the present 
study the overall prevalence of halitosis according to 

the questionnaire (depending on the answer of 
question one which inquired the students if they have 

had bad breath to assess the awareness of the students 
about halitosis), the result was approaching fifty 
percent, this was almost similar to the results 

reported in Qassim, Saudi Arabia (19), which is also 
lower in comparison to a study done in Kinondoni 
(2013), but at the same time is higher 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 
 
 

15 
  

J Bagh College Dentistry              Vol. 33(1), March 2021              Prevalence of self-reported 

Table (2): Descriptive and statistical test of Plaque index and gingival index among the presence of 

halitosis. 

variables 

Q1 

T df P-value Yes NO 

Mean SE Mean SE 

PLI 0.952* 0.035 0.747 0.032 4.311 398 0.000 S 

GI 0.852* 0.032 0.723 0.031 2.871 398 0.004 S 

**=highly significant at p <0.01 
 

Table (3) ׃   Descriptive and statistical test of Plaque index among questionnaire 
 

 

 

 

 

 

SRQ= self-reported questionnaire of halitosis   No.= number     *S꞊ Highly significant p <0.01 
 

Table (4) ׃   Descriptive and statistical test of gingival index among questionnaire 

SRQ 

Categories 

T df P-value Yes NO 

Mean ±SE Mean ±SE 

Q2 0.847 0.035 0.731 0.029 2.569 398 0.011 

Q3 0.932* 0.053 0.745* 0.025 3.447 398 0.001* 

Q4 0.872* 0.037 0.727* 0.028 3.174 398 0.002* 

Q5 0.872* 0.032 0.708* 0.031 3.656 398 0.000* 

Q6 0.837* 0.030 0.725* 0.034 2.471 398 0.014* 

Q7 0.820 0.031 0.758 0.032 1.349 398 0.178  

*= highly significant at p<0.01

than the findings reported in other populations 
especially Brazil (8), USA (1996) (20). In these studies, 
the gender had no statistically significant association 
to the outcome with similar methodology (8), so the 
result of the current study could be compared with 

these studies. The prevalence of halitosis according 
to total score of the questionnaire was 86.5% higher 
than the prevalence of halitosis in Jordanian 

population which was 78% (10), this may be due to the 
overall poorer oral hygiene, or the assumption by 

other authors that halitosis might be an 
underestimated oral health problem in the general 
population may be true (21), or living in low-middle 

income countries (22). The high prevalence of 
periodontal diseases in low-middle income countries 

might cause the greater prevalence of halitosis, in 
addition the intake of volatile foods such as spices 

and garlic may lead to change in breath odor, and 
consequently halitosis, another cause for the great 
prevalence of halitosis is the dryness of the mouth 

which plays an important role in the formation and 

perpetuation of halitosis (23). 
Plaque, composed of bacteria and salivary proteins, 
is one sulfur source in the oral cavity. In an 
epidemiological study conducted among the 2000 

Chinese population, plaque index is significantly 
correlated with VSC values (12). This finding was 
agreed with the data presented in this study, in which 

the plaque index was associated

  

SRQ 

Categories 

T df P-value* Yes NO 

No. Mean SE No. Mean SE 

Q2 188 0.918* 0.034 212 0.784* 0.034 2.765 398 0.006* 

Q3 87 1.048* 0.056 313 0.791* 0.026 4.455 398 0.000* 

Q4 162 0.988* 0.039 238 0.751* 0.030 4.906 398 0.000* 

Q5 190 0.986* 0.036 210 0.721* 0.031 5.626 398 0.000* 

Q6 217 0.928* 0.032 183 0.750* 0.036 3.702 398 0.000* 

Q7 179 0.948* 0.039 221 0.765 0.029 3.795 398 0.000* 



 
 
 

16 
  

J Bagh College Dentistry              Vol. 33(1), March 2021              Prevalence of self-reported 

Table (5) ׃   Descriptive and statistical test of caries experience among questionnaire. 

SRQ 

Dental caries Categories 

T df P-value Yes NO 

Mean SE Mean SE 

Q2 DS 2.441 0.161 2.264 0.174 0.741 398 0.459NS 

MS 0.186 0.069 0.189 0.066 0.026 398 0.979NS 

FS 1.250 0.139 1.118 0.126 0.705 398 0.481NS 

DMFS 3.877 0.267 3.571 0.257 0.828 398 0.408NS 

DMFT 2.234* 0.107 1.915 0.104 2.141 398 0.033* 

Q3 DS 2.575 0.233 2.284 0.138 1.003 398 0.316NS 

MS 0.230 0.113 0.176 0.052 0.469 398 0.639NS 

FS 1.437 0.240 1.109 0.099 1.451 398 0.148NS 

DMFS 4.242 0.397 3.569 0.209 1.503 398 0.134NS 

DMFT 2.322 0.166 1.994 0.083 1.818 398 0.070NS 

Q4 DS 2.648* 0.195 2.143 0.150 2.086 398 0.038* 

MS 0.154 0.068 0.210 0.065 0.575 398 0.566NS 

FS 1.327 0.175 1.080 0.102 1.301 398 0.194NS 

DMFS 4.129 0.310 3.433 0.227 1.855 398 0.064NS 

DMFT 2.321* 0.122 1.891 0.093 2.853 398 0.005* 

Q5 DS 2.616* 0.174 2.105 0.163 2.147 398 0.032* 

MS 0.158 0.064 0.214 0.070 0.592 398 0.554NS 

FS 1.453* 0.161 0.933 0.100 2.799 398 0.005* 

DMFS 4.227* 0.284 3.252 0.237 2.649 398 0.008* 

DMFT 2.337* 0.114 1.819 0.095 3.511 398 0.000* 

Q6 DS 2.687* 0.182 1.945 0.142 3.127 398 0.002* 

MS 0.253 0.075 0.109 0.054 1.513 398 0.131NS 

FS 1.221 0.117 1.131 0.150 0.480 398 0.632NS 

DMFS 4.161* 0.261 3.185 0.255 2.647 398 0.008* 

DMFT 2.323* 0.101 1.760 0.106 3.819 398 0.000* 

Q7 DS 2.508 0.167 2.217 0.168 1.214 398 0.226NS 

MS 0.168 0.067 0.204 0.067 0.376 398 0.707NS 

FS 1.346 0.165 1.045 0.103 1.606 398 0.109NS 

DMFS 4.022 0.281 3.466 0.245 1.498 398 0.135NS 

DMFT 2.229* 0.120 1.932 0.093 1.984 398 0.048* 

with halitosis. However, another study showed no 
significant association between plaque accumulation 
and halitosis in 2000 Belgian patients (24), this was 

inconsistent with the findings of Liu et al. (2006) and 
Kanehira et al. (2004) (plaque index). 

Gingivitis is reversible and infrequently developed to 
periodontitis in children and adolescent except in 
special circumstances like aggressive periodontitis 

and periodontitis associated with systemic diseases 
(25). In the current study the finding is consistent with 
Liu et al. (2006) (12), Kara et al. (2006) (26), P. S. Patil 

et al. (2014) (27), Al- Saidy (2013) (28), Ziaei N (2019) 
(29) and Alzoman H. (2020) (30). Although halitosis is 

possibly not caused by periodontal disease, there is 
ample proof to suggest that periodontal disease 
increases the severity of halitosis with higher 

production of volatile sulphur compounds (27). This 
can be explained as periodontal conditions favour 

bacterial growth and retention of debris, besides, the 
blood decomposition products can themselves 
produce Sulphur containing peptides and amino 

acids that are the source of volatile Sulphur 
compounds. However, Kanehira et al. (2004) (31) 

reported no association between halitosis and 
periodontal condition. 
In the present study, there was a highly significant 

association between dental caries experience 
represented via DMF index and self-reported 
halitosis, which was in agreement with CM 

Kayombo (2017) (20). The findings were opposing 
with those of Miyazaki et al. (1995) (32), Kanehira et 

al. (2004) (31) and Liu et al. (2006) (12). Glucose and 
sucrose can constrain the enzymee activity of 
salivary peptides by making an acidic environment 
(33). Therefore, an acidic condition created by dental 
plaque may destroy VSC production. However, 



 
 
 

17 
  

J Bagh College Dentistry              Vol. 33(1), March 2021              Prevalence of self-reported 

Nalcaci et al. (2008) (34) found that the prevalence 

and severity of dental caries had a significant role in 
halitosis, as an increase in DMFT indicates an 

increase in caries and a low oral hygiene level, and it 
seems rational that this may increase the chance of 
halitosis. Previous studies have shown that this is 

true (29), this was a result to increase the incidence of 
unidentifiable Gram-negative rods, Gram-positive 
rods and Gram-negative coccobacilli, the increase in 

species diversity found in halitosis samples proposes 
that halitosis may be the result of complex 
collaborations between several bacterial species (35). 

 

CONCLUSION 
Patients’ self-reported halitosis was found to be 

associated with dental plaque, gingivitis and dental 
caries. The existing findings suggest that a self-
reported questionnaire of halitosis can be used to 

judge one’s halitosis. 
 

REFERENCES 
 

1. Rösing Ck, Loesche W. Halitosis: an overview of 
epidemiology, etiology and clinical management. Braz Oral Res 

2011; 25: 466471. 

2. Eldarrat AH. Influence of oral health and lifestyle on oral 
malodour. Int Dent J 2011; 61: 4751. 

3. Hujoel PP. Endopoints in periodontal trials: the need for an 
evidence based research approach. Periodontol 2000 2004; 

36:196204. 

4. Armfield Jm, Mejia GC, Jamieson Lm. Socioeconomic and 
psychosocial correlates of oral health. Int Dent J 2013; 63: 

202209. 

5. Seemann R, Conceicao MD, Filippi A Greenman J., et al. 
Halitosis management by the general dental practitioner—

results of an international consensus workshop. J Breath Res 

2014; 8(1): 017101. 

6. Silness J. & Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. 
Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. 

Acta odontologica scandinavica 1964; 22(1): 121-135. 

7. Löe H. & Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy I. 
Prevalence and severity. Acta odontologica scandinavica 1963; 

21(6): 533-551. 

8. Montalverne H. B. Lopes, Cassiano K. Rösing, Paulo Roberto 
G. Colussi, et al.. Prevalence of self-reported halitosis and 

associated factors in adolescents from southern brazil. Acta 

Odontol. Latinoam 2016; 29 (2):93-103. 

9. Aline Carrascosa Agostinho, Karina Guedes De Sousa, Camila 
Nobre De Freitas, et al. Translation, Transcultural Adaptation 

and Validation of the Halitosis Associated Life-Quality Test for 

Use in Brazilian Adolescents. SciELO Analytics 2019; 19: 

1983-4632. 

10. Hammad Mm, Darwazeh Am, Al-Waeli H, Tarakji B, 
Alhadithy TT. Prevalence and awareness of halitosis in a 

sample of Jordanian population. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dent 

2014; 4: S178-S186.  

11. Sebastian G. Ciancio. Current status of indices of gingivitis. 
clinical periodontology J 1986; 13(5): 375-378. 

12. Liu Xn, Shinada K, Chen Xc, Zhang Bx, Yaegaki K, Kawaguchi 
Y. Oral malodor-related parameters in the Chinese general 

population. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33:31–6. 

13. Villa A, Zollanvari A, Alterovitz G. et al. Prevalence of halitosis 
in children considering oral hygiene, gender and age. Int J Dent 

Hyg 2014; 12(3):208-12.  

14. Patil PS, Pujar P, Poornima S & SubbareddyV. Prevalence of 
oral malodour and its relationship with oral parameters in Indian 

children aged 7–15 years. Europ Arch Paediat Dent 2014; (15): 

251–258. 

15. Amir E, Shimonov R, Rosenberg M. et al.. Halitsis in children. 
J of pediatrics 1999; 134(3):338-43.  

16. Nadanovsky P, Carvalho Lb, Ponce De Leon A.. Oral malodour 
and its association with age and sex in a general population in 

Brazil. Oral Dis 2007; 13:105–9. 

17. Al-Atrooshi Ba, Al-Rawi As. Oral halitosis and oral hygiene 
practices among dental students. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2007; 19:72-

76.  

18. Hasan G. A. Oral hygiene practices and self-perceived halitosis 
among dental students. J Bagh Coll Dent 2014; 26 (3): 58-62. 

19. Mumghamba EGS & Rutaihwa RD. “Self-reported, 
subjectively-determined breath malodor, associated factors, 

treatment seeking behavior and oral hygiene practices among 

adults in Kinondoni, Tanzania, Tanzania Dent J 2013; 18 (1): 

1–13. 

20. Kayombo C, Mumghamba E. Self-Reported Halitosis in 
relation to Oral Hygiene Practices, Oral Health Status, General 

Health Problems, and Multifactorial Characteristics among 

Workers in Ilala and Temeke Municipals, TIJD. 2017. 

21. Kazor, C. E., Mitchell, P. M., Lee, A. M., Stokes, L. N., 
Loesche, W. J., Dewhirst, F. E., & Paster, B. J. Diversity of 

bacterial populations on the tongue dorsa of patients with 

halitosis and healthy patients. J. Clin. Microbiol 2003; 41: 558–

563. 

22. Silva Mf, Leite Fr, Ferreira Lb, Pola Nm, Scannapieco Fa, 
Demarco FF. Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic 

review and meta-regression analysis. Clinical oral 

investigations. 2018;  22(1):47-55. 

23. Suzuki N, Yoneda M, Naito T, Iwamoto T, Yamada K, Hisama 
K, Okada I, Hirofuji T. The relationship between alcohol 

consumption and oral malodour. Int Dent J 2009; 59:31–34 

24. Quirynen M, Dadamio J, Van Den Velde S, De Smit M, 
Dekeyser C, Van Tornout M, Vandekerckhove B. 

Characteristics of 2000 patients who visited a halitosis clinic. J 

Clin Periodontol 2009; 36:970– 975. 

25. Azodo Cc, Agbor Am. Gingival health and oral hygiene 
practices of schoolchildren in the North West Region of 

Cameroon. BMC research notes 2015; 8(1):385. 

26. Kara C, Tezel A, Orbak R. Effect of oral hygiene instruction 
and  scaling on oral malodour in a population of Turkish 

children  with gingival  inflammation. Int J Pediatr Dent 2006; 

16: 399–404. 

27. Patil PS, Pujar P, Poornima S & SubbareddyV. Prevalence of 
oral malodour and its relationship with oral parameters in Indian 

children aged 7–15 years. European Archives of Paediatric 

Dentistry 2014; (15): 251–258. 

28. Al-Saadi, A. Oral health condition and salivary constituents 
(zinc, copper, calcium, iron and total protein) among the 

selected overweight primary school children. A master thesis, 

College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad.2009. 

29. Ziaei N, Hosseinpour S, Nazari H, Rezaei M, Rezaei K. 
Halitosis and Its Associated Factors Among Kermanshah High 

School Students (2015). Clinical, cosmetic and investigational 

dentistry. 2019; 11:327. 

30. Hamad Alzoman Takashi Kanehira, Junji Takehara, Dairo 
Takahashi, Okahito Honda.  Prevalence of oral malodor and the 

relationship with habitual mouth breathing in children. JCPD 

2004; 28(4):285-8. 

31. Takashi Kanehira, Junji Takehara, Dairo Takahashi, Okahito 
Honda.  Prevalence of oral malodor and the relationship with 

habitual mouth breathing in children. JCPD 2004; 28(4):285-8. 



 
 
 

18 
  

J Bagh College Dentistry              Vol. 33(1), March 2021              Prevalence of self-reported 

32. Miyazaki H, Sakao S, Katoh Y. et al. Correlation between 
volatile sulphur compounds and certain oral health 

measurements in the general population. J Periodontol 1996; 

66:679–84. 

33. Tonzetich J. Production and origin of oral malodor: A review of 
mechanisms and methods of analysis. Periodontology J. 1977; 

48: 13–20.  

34. Nalcaci R, Dulgergil T, Oba Aa, Gelgor IE. Prevalence of 
breath  malodour in 7–11-year-old children living in middle 

Anatolia, Turkey. Community Dent Health. 2008. 25:173–7. 

35. Donaldson Ac, Mckenzie D, Riggio Mp, Hodge Pj, Rolph H, 
Flanagan A, Bagg J. Microbiological culture analysis of the 

tongue anaerobic microflora in subjects with and without 

halitosis. Oral Diseases 2005; 11:61−63. 

 

 المستخلص

ؤدي  رائحة الفم الكريهة هي حالة شائعة وغالبًا ما تحدث بسبب تراكم البكتيريا في الفم بسبب أمراض اللثة أو الطعام أو البالك. يمكن أن ي ׃خلفيةال
لفم  كما أنه يرتبط باالكتئاب وأعراض اضطراب الوسواس القهري. كان الهدف من هذه الدراسة هو تقييم انتشار رائحة ا  المتضررين،إلى القلق بين  

سنة في مدينة كربالء    15حالة اللثة وتسوس األسنان( لدى الطالب الذكور في سن    األسنان، الكريهة المبلغ عنها ذاتيا والعوامل المرتبطة بها )لوحة  

 .ةكريهفم درسنا قلق المراهقين بأنفاسهم وما إذا كان أي شخص قد أخبرهم من قبل أن لديهم رائحة  ذلك،في العراق. باإلضافة إلى 
 كربالء، سنة من المدارس الحكومية والخاصة في مدينة  15تم إجراء مسح رصد مقطعي على طالب المدارس الثانوية في سن  المواد والطرق:

،  PIمدرسة. مقابلة مع استبيان منظم وأجريت جنبا إلى جنب مع قياس المعلمات الشفوية )   44مراهق من    400العراق. تكونت العينة العشوائية من  
GI ،DMF.) 

كريهة حسب الدرجة الكلية ٪ وفقًا للسؤال األول. كانت نسبة انتشار رائحة الفم ال48.50كان انتشار رائحة الفم الكريهة المبلغ عنها ذاتيًا   النتائج:
والتي    ذاتيًا،أن هناك انتشاًرا كبيًرا لرائحة الفم الكريهة المبلغ عنها  أي  ٪ بعدم إصابتهم برائحة الفم الكريهة.  13.5٪. بينما أفاد  86.5لالستبيان  

سنان وحالة اللثة بشكل كبير مع رائحة الفم ترتبط بالنمط االجتماعي واالقتصادي. أبلغ معظم المراهقين عن قلقهم من أنفاسهم. ارتبطت لوحة األ 

قد يكون االنتشار الكبير لرائحة الفم الكريهة المبلغ عنها ذاتيًا وفقًا لالستبيان بين الطالب بسبب تناول الثوم أو الطعام  الكريهة المبلغ عنها ذاتيا.
  باإلضافة إلى أن طبقة البالك والتهاب اللثة وتسوس األسنان تسبب زيادة في مستوى مركب الفضة المتطاير مما يؤدي إلى زيادة رائحة الفم  الحار،

 .الكريهة

رائحة الفم    ٪ من المراهقين في مدينة كربالء. تم العثور على 50رائحة الفم الكريهة المبلغ عنها ذاتيا هي حالة سائدة في حوالي    : اتاالستنتاج
 .الكريهة للمرضى المبلغ عنها ذاتيًا مرتبطة بلويحة األسنان والتهاب اللثة وتسوس األسنان

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Articles Published by Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry is licensed under a Creative 

Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/