Marwan.doc


J Bagh College Dentistry                    Vol. 27(2), June 2015                             Management of 
   

 

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontics 123 
 

Management of facial fistulas and sinuses 
 
Marwan G. Saied, B.D.S., F.I.C.M.S. (1)  
Ahmed A. Al-Kinani, M.B.Ch.B., F.I.C.M.S. (2)   
 
ABSTRACT 
Background: A major difference between the treatment of the skin lesions and the odontogenic and non-
odontogenic sinuses. We aimed to analyze a substantial number of consecutive causes in order to clinical suspicion 
in the differential diagnoses may be correctly weighted. 
Materials and methods: The material of this research consisted of 40 patients. A complete history is collected from the 
patients with the duration and the site of the sinus present, the patient was examined for factors of the fistulas and 
sinuses and its associations, and patient having any concomitant lesions, a medical consultation done for opinion 
and management. Clinical examination with facial fistulas and sinuses was mandatory to avoid any mistakes that 
may occur. A treatment plan was contemplated regarding a conservative line will be followed or a surgical 
intervention was indicated results. 
Results: The common etiological causes: congenital and acquired causes. Fifteen patients have eighteen facial 
sinuses and fistulas (40.9%) developed because of non-odontogenic infections, fifteen patients had fifteen facial 
sinuses (34%) because of odontogenic infections, four congenital sinuses (9%) developed at three patients, two 
patients with two facial sinuses (4.5%) due to tumor growth, three patients with three facial fistulas (6.8%) due to 
traumatic causes and one patient with one facial sinus (2.2%) because of Actinomycosis and unknown cause for 
each.  
Conclusions: The maxillofacial surgeon should be aware of causes of whether developmental anomalies, deep 
seated infections, epithelization of the tract, insufficient or inadequate drainage, deep lining foreign bodies and 
certain types of infections. 
Key words: Facial fistulas and sinuses, management, odontogenic and non-odontogenic causes. (J Bagh Coll 
Dentistry 2015; 27(2):123-129).  

 

INTRODUCTION 
Facial fistulas and sinuses comprise an 

important group of lesions which may present to 
specialists in numerous branches of medicine. The 
true fistula, an abnormal communication between 
the lumen of one viscous and the lumen of another 
body surface, is rare. The more common clinical 
presentation is the sinus, a blind tract lined with 
granulations leading from an epithelial surface 
into the surrounding tissues. 

The special consideration for facial fistulas 
and sinuses are because of their resemblance of its 
appearances to basal cell carcinoma, sebaceous 
cyst, and other skin lesions as a furuncle can be 
misdiagnosed as a sinus tract to the skin of the 
face (1) (Table1).  

 
Infective facial fistulas and sinuses 
Dental cause 

The opening of the sinus may be found at far 
distance from the dental focus of infection, a sinus 
from a tooth infection opened on the chest and 
another on the upper third of the thigh (3).  

Dental infections simulating skin lesions (4) . 
Cutaneous sinuses tract of dental origin in 
children (5), a dental etiology as part of differential 
diagnosis should be kept in mind with oro-facial 
skin lesion (6).   

 
(1) Maxillofacial Surgeon,  Department of Maxillofacial surgery, 

Al-Wasity Hospital, Ministry of Health  
(2) Plastic Surgeon, Department of Plastic surgery, Al-Wasity 

Hospital, Ministry of Health  

Table1: Etiology of facial fistulas and sinuses (2) 

Actinomycosis 
Actinomycosis is a chronic spreading 

suppurative and granulomatous lesion caused 
primarily by Actinomyces israelii. Draining 
sinuses are formed through which the 
characteristic “Sulphur granules” are discharged. 
A persistent periapical disease with recurrent 
sinus tracts, histological diagnosis confirmed 
actinomycosis, the lesion was treated with 
antibiotics and periapical surgery (7). 

 
Osteomyelitis 

A case of sinus discharge at infra orbital 
region after repair of orbital floor defect by a 
silastic sheet and another case of two sinuses 

1 Embryological  Preauricular sinus. Labial region. 

2 Infective 

Dental causes. 
Specific infections e.g. T.B.,  
actinomycosis.  
Osteomyelitis. 
Dental implant. 
BRONJ 

3 Trauma 
Transected salivary ducts. 
Infected fractures. 
Bullet injury. 

4 Carcinoma 
Result of carcinomatous 
growth. 
Effect of radiation. 

5 Miscellaneous Malnutrition (cancrum oris). 



J Bagh College Dentistry                    Vol. 27(2), June 2015                             Management of 
   

 

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontics 124 
 

discharging at submental region due to infected 
mandibular fracture (8) .  

An additional cause for oral cutaneous fistulas 
is bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of jaws 
(BRONJ) (9) , so any oral/ dental causes increasing 
BRONJ include abscesses, periodontal disease. 
The risk of development of BRONJ with oral 
bisphosphonate is very small but increase when 
therapy exceeds 3 years (10) . 
    
Dental implant 
Dental implants can develop infections, leading to 
intraoral and possibly extraoral sinus tract 
drainage (11) . 

 
Carcinomatous Cause of Facial Fistulae 

An orocutaneous fistula can occur after any 
operation on the oral cavity to remove a tumour 
and the most important causative factors are 
previous radiotherapy and inadequate control of 
nutritional status, diabetes and anaemia in the 
preoperative period, poor operative technique. 
Often the fistula will be the result of surgical 
intervention for the neoplastic disease (12) .  

A case of an orocutaneous fistula reported 
with pathological fracture of the mandible in 
patient with osteoradionecrosis which followed 
orthovoltage radiation (13). Also  a case  reported  
of  an oropharyngocutaneous  fistula  in  an  
irradiated  patient (14). 
 
MATERIALS AND METHODS 

The material of this study consisted of 40 
patients with (44) facial fistulas and sinuses  (26 
males and 14 females and the average was 
20years) suffering of a fistula or sinus in the facial 
region, between September 2009 and November 
2013, at the Al-Wasity hospital for reconstructive 
surgery at Al-Resafa institute of ministry of 
health, Baghdad- Iraq. They were either referred 
from other hospitals or outpatient clinic of the 
same hospital. The common an etiological cause 
were divided into two groups: Congenital and 
acquired causes and the acquired causes divided 
into odontogenic infection, non-odontogenic 
infection, traumatic, tumor growth, actinomycosis 
and unknown causes (Table 2).  Our definition of 
the face as the front part of the head which 
includes lips, cheeks, nose, eyes, forehead and one 
finger below lower border of the mandible.  We 
excluded the fistulas and sinuses which occur in 
the neck or inside the mouth. On admission a 
complete history was collected from the patients 

concerning name, age, gender, residency, the 
duration and the site of the sinus present. Clinical 
examinations of the patients is mandatory which 
include inspection, palpation and probing the 
sinus as well as radiographic examination which 
include conventional radiographical views like 
periapical, occlusal, panoramic views of the 
mandible and lower portions of maxilla and 
supplementary methods like sinography with 
stainless steel wire 0.5 mm in diameter or 
sinogram with injection of radiopaque dye 
(ipomer) through sinus tract. 

We examined cutaneous tissue of the face to 
look for any skin lesion or dental lesion or 
malignant tumor. Also parotid region and 
submandibular with submental regions have 
examined to look for any salivary gland fistulas or 
dental lesion. Teeth are checked and recorded 
(deciduous and permanent), recorded whether 
sound healthy or carious teeth, also looking for 
any swelling intraorally. Also intraoral palpation 
of a cord-like structure connecting the skin lesion 
with the underlying alveolar ridge is helpful in 
establishing the diagnosis and according to the 
diagnosis, a treatment plan was contemplated, 
regarding a conservative line will be followed or a 
surgical intervention was indicated.  
 
RESULTS 
Fourteen patients have seventeen facial sinuses at 
submandibular region, four patients with four 
facial sinuses at submental region, eleven patients 
with eleven facial sinuses at cheek region, three 
patients with three facial sinuses at preauricular 
region and canthal regions for each, one patient 
with two labial sinuses, one patient with facial 
sinus at temporal region, parotid region, chin 
region, zygomatic region for each, (Table 3). Four 
patients having facial fistula (either orocutaneous 
or salivary fistula), thirty-four patients having 
facial sinus, two patients having facial fistula and 
sinus, and two patients have bilateral facial 
sinuses (Table 4).  
Table 2: Causes of facial Fistulas and sinuses 

 

 
   

 
 

Causes % 
Non-odontogenic infection 40.9% 
Odontogenic infection 34% 
Congenital 9% 
Traumatic 6.8% 
Tumor 4.5% 
Actinomycosis 2.2% 
Un known 2.2% 



J Bagh College Dentistry                    Vol. 27(2), June 2015                             Management of 
   

 

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontics 125 
 

Table 3: Sites of facial fistulas and sinuses 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Table 4: Number and percentage of patients with fistulas and sinuses 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The facial sinuses were more in males 
prevalent than in females (65% versus 35%) 
(Figure 1), and the (16-30) year's cohort made up 
the largest group (32.5%)  (Figure 2).  

Surgical interruption was adopted in 31 
patients with 35 facial sinuses or fistulas (Figure 
3). Six of the patients with facial sinus associated 
with a mandibular fracture infection. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Sites Patients Number of  fistulas and sinuses Percentage 

Submandibular region 14 17 38.6% 
Cheek region 11 11 25% 

Submental region 4 4 9% 
Preauricular region 3 3 6.8% 

Canthal regions 3 3 6.8% 
Temporal region 1 1 2.2% 

Labial region 1 2 4.4% 
Zygomatic region 1 1 2.2% 

Chin region 1 1 2.2% 
Parotid region 1 1 2.2% 

Type Number of patients Percentage 
Facial fistula only 4 10% 
Facial sinus only 34 85% 

Facial fistula and sinus 2 5% 
Facial sinus "bilaterally" 2 5% 

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 60 Onward

Figure 2: Age distribution 
 

Figure 3: Mode of treatment 

Males 60%

FEMALES 40%

Figure 1: Sex distribution 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

S urg ic al  tre atme n t co nse rva tio n trea tme nt re fus e trea tme nt



J Bagh College Dentistry                    Vol. 27(2), June 2015                             Management of 
   

 

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontics 126 
 

DISCUSSION 
A chronic facial lesion is occasionally the skin 

manifestation of a fistula of dental abscess origin. 
It will persist until the abscess nidus is obliterated. 
The distance of the lesion from the oral cavity and 
the patient freedom from tooth discomfort do not 
exclude the dental cause. 

This study showed that (32.5%) of the affected 
patients were in the age group (16-30) years old 
while (22.5%) were in the age group( 31-45) years 
of age, (20%) were in the age group of (0-15)  
years of age, (15%) were in the age group (46-60) 
years of age and (10%) were in the age group 60 
onward. Seventy-five percent of patients were 
under 45 years, this goes with Malik and Bailey 
series (2), perhaps because of shorter life 
expectancy. The predominant males to females 
ratio was supported by Mortenson et al. (15) and 
Malik and Bailey series (2)  were more than 60% 
of patients were males and about 40% were 
females. 

In this study Non-odontogenic infections was 
the most common cause and this include for 
example patients with facial sinuses due to 
infected bone graft. Also in this series TMJ 
arthritis cause a facial sinus in one of our patients 
who was uncontrolled diabetic patient and other 
patient presented with orocutaneous fistula at 
submandibular region after excision of sequamous 
cell carcinoma of the tongue with pectoralis major 
flap for reconstructive due to infection with 
staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas 
microorganisms .While in previous studies the 
distributions of cases based towards odontogenic 
origin and this is perhaps because many of 
patients may go to other departments or remain 
totally symptomless or the sinuses usually 
develop in connection with the developmental 
anomalies or because of presence of a deep seated 
infection or the presence of certain types of 
infection of the tract wall. Odontogenic infections 

is a second of frequency in this study while in 
Malik and Bailey series (2) in two years period 
treated 100 consecutive cases of facial sinuses 
with a mean of 50 patients per year was the 
commonest cause of facial sinuses . One patient 
was diagnosed by general surgeon as a skin lesion 
so he treated three times by local excision of the 
sinus for one year duration while the diagnosis 
was infected keratocyst in the ramus of the 
mandible, other patient presented with a 
submandibular  sinus for six months duration as 
skin lesion and the diagnosis was infected carious 
lower mandibular first molar tooth. A dental 
examination and radiographs recommended to 
rule out infection of dental origin (16) . One patient 
presented with a facial sinus discharging pus at 
lateral canthal region of left eye due to 
osteomyelitis of the left maxilla. We reported four 
sinuses discharging in four patients due to 
infected maxillary teeth  while Chernosky (1940)  
said maxillary sinuses discharging are rare and the 
gravity is accepted as the reason for the facility 
with which lower jaw abscess proceed to 
fistulization . So we think a cutaneous facial sinus 
tract of dental origin are often initially 
misdiagnosed and inappropriately treated. Correct 
diagnosis and treatment will result in predictable 
and rapid healing of these lesions. The third cause 
of facial sinuses was congenital cause, which 
result in four facial sinuses in three patients (9%) 
and these includes preauricular sinuses in two 
patients. The fourth cause of facial sinuses and 
fistulas was a traumatic cause. The fifth cause of 
facial sinuses was a tumor growth which result in 
two facial sinuses in two patients (4.5%) while 
this finding recorded in Malik and Bailey series   
a third cause. The sixth cause of facial sinuses 
was actinomycosis infection which results in one 
facial sinus (2.2%) and this goes with Malik and 
Bailey series  who they considered this finding 
one of uncommon causes (Figure 4). 

 
Figure 4: Patient with multiple sinuses due to actinomycosis infection. 



J Bagh College Dentistry                    Vol. 27(2), June 2015                             Management of 
   

 

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontics 127 
 

The basic technique for management of facial 
fistula or sinus depends on the correct diagnosis 
which includes the awareness of the possibility of 
an odontogenic sinus by knowing that striking 
granulomatous lesion which may occurs about the 
gum, the face, and the neck and which may 
presents one end of a persistent sinus tract. The 
other end of this sinus usually originates in the 
apical abscess of a tooth but may take its origin in 
any osteomyelitis process of the jaw or foreign 
body infections. Out of the forty four facial 
fistulas and sinuses, four sinuses and three facial 
fistulas were treated conservatively, the treatment 
involve the detection of the cause which lead to 

the sinus or fistula formation either infected tooth 
with periapical pathosis or salivary gland injury 
have been treated conservatively through dressing 
extraorally with iodoform packing intraorally. 
Surgical treatment was considered in thirty two 
facial sinuses and three facial fistulas. Fourteen 
sinuses due to odontogenic infection treated by 
extraction of the tooth and endodontic therapy of 
the tooth with curettage of the sinus tract with 
antibiotic or removal odontogenic cyst, four 
sinuses due to foreign body infection treated by 
removal of the bony sequestrum or the stainless 
steel wire (Figure 5). 

A        B 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

C 
Figure 5: A: patient with sinus discharge due to infected stainless steel wire for fixation of bone 

graft of right mandibular body reconstruction; 
B: radiograph shows infected stainless wire fixation; 

C: patient after the removal of the infected stainless steel wire and healed sinus discharge 
 

Two sinuses due to infected mandibular  
fracture in some patients because of  the presence 
of a tooth in the mandibular fracture lead to 
infected fracture and sinus formation treated by 
extraction of the tooth with curation of the socket 
of tooth, three sinuses and one orocutaneous 
fistula due to bone graft infection (autogenous 
outer table of iliac crest bone), four sinuses and 
one cutaneous fistula due to osteomyelitis of the 

jaws, one sinus due to arthritis of TMJ who was a 
known case of IDDM  result in a temporal abscess 
with a cutaneous sinus discharge we treated him 
by controlling the blood sugar level with drainage 
of temporal abscess, one patient with 
orocutaneous fistula postoperatively to excision of 
carcinoma of tongue treated by a free flap (Radial 
Chinese flap) (Figure 6) , two patients with four 
congenital sinuses an  elliptical incisions were 



J Bagh College Dentistry                    Vol. 27(2), June 2015                             Management of 
   

 

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontics 128 
 

made and sinus tract were dissected out together 
with direct closures while for the facial sinuses for 
actinomycosis infection treated by debridement 
with  a heavy antibiotics. 

The use of a negative pressure vacuum 
associated closure technique for orocutaneous 
fistulas was reported (17). 

                                      A                             B 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

                                                                                 C 
 

Figure 6: Patient with orocutaneous fistula, A: Closure of orocutaneous fistula by forarm radial 
free flap (Chinese flap), B: intraorally, C: extraorally. 

 
 

All patients except the patient treated for 
excision of a malignant tumor were operated upon 
under local anesthesia or conservatively. Two 

patients refuse the treatment and one only one 
facial sinus unhealed. The majority of the patients 
kept on regular follow up for 2-3 weeks (Table 5). 

  



J Bagh College Dentistry                    Vol. 27(2), June 2015                             Management of 
   

 

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontics 129 
 

Table 5: Treatment of 44 cases of facial sinuses 
 

 
REFERENCES 
 

1. Cantatore JL, Klein PA, Lieblich LM. Cutaneous 
dental sinus tract, a common misdiagnosis: a case 
report and review of the literature. Cutis Nov 2002; 
70(5): 264-7 

2. Malik SA, Bailey BMW. Cervicofacial Sinuses. 
British J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 22: 178-88. 

3. Endelman J. Cutaneous sinus tract of odontogenic 
origin. A misdiagnosed lesion. Indian J Dental Sci 
2014; 1: 6. 

4. Abuabara A, Schramm CA, Zielak JC, Baratto-Fillo 
F. Dental infection simulating skin lesion. An Bars 
Dermatol 2012; 87(4): 619-21. 

5. Bonder L, Manor E, Joshua BZ, Barabas J, Szabo G. 
Cutanous sinus tract of dental origin in children. 
Pediatr Dermatol 2012; 29(4): 421-5. 

6. Diagnosis and treatment of odontogenic cutaneous 
sinuses of endodontic origin and diagnosis of 
cutaneous facial fistulae of dental origin. Oral Surg 
Oral Med Oral Pathol 2011. 

7. Jeansonne BG. Periapical actinomycosis: a 
review. Quintessence Int 2005; 36(2):149-53. 

8. Rowe NL, Williams J. Maxillofacial injuries. 1985 
9. Cassio P, et al. Bisphosphonate- related 

osteonecrosis of jaws in patient with multiple 
myloma. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal 2008; 
13(1): E52-7. 

10. Eklund MK. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis 
of the jaws (BRONJ). Southwest Oral Surgery and 
Implant Blog; 2010. 

11. Tözüm TF, Sençimen M, Ortakoglu K, Ozdemir A, 
Aydin OC, Keles M. Diagnosis and treatment of a 
large periapical implant lesion associated with 
adjacent natural tooth: a case report. Oral Surg Oral 
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101(6): 
e132-8. 

12. Wood NK, Goaz PW. Differential diagnosis of oral 
lesions. 3ed ed. 1985. p. 193-203. 

13. Topazian RG, Goldbery MH. Oral and maxillofacial 
infections. 3rd ed. W.B. Saunders Co.; 1994. 

14. Olasz L, Kawashie F, Nemth A. Closure of 
oropharyngocutaneous fistulae in an irradiated 
patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28: 364-5. 

15. Mortencen H, Winther JE, Birn H. Periapical 
granulomas and cysts. An investigation of 1600 
cases. Scand J Dent Res 1970; 78: 241. 

16. Sheehan DJ, Potter BJ, Davis LS.  Cutaneous 
draining sinus tract of odontogenic origin: unusual 
presentation of a challenging diagnosis. South Med J 
2005; 98(2): 250-2. 

17. Andrews BT, Smith RB. Orocutaneous and 
pharyngocutaneous fistulae. Ann Oto/ Rhino/ 
Laryngol 2008: 117(4): 298-302. 

  
  :الخالصة
نحن تھدف إلى تحلیل عدد كبیر من األسباب متتالیة من أجل االشتباه السریري في . شأ وغیر سنیة المنشأھناك فرق كبیر بین معالجة اآلفات الجلدیة والنواسیر سنیة المن: المقدمة

  .التشخیص التفریقي یمكن المرجحة بشكل صحیح
لنواسیر الحاضر، تم فحص المریض لعوامل من یتم تحصیل التاریخ الكامل من المرضى الذین یعانون من مدة وموقع ا. مریضا 40المواد من ھذا البحث وتألفت من : المواد و الطرائق

كان الفحص السریري للناسور والتجاویف الوجھیة  إلزامیة لتجنب أي أخطاء قد . الناسور والمتعلقات لھا، وجود أي اآلفات المصاحبة، واالستشارة الطبیة القیام بھ إلبداء الرأي واإلدارة
  .العالج تحفظیًا أو التداخل جراحیًا تم التفكیر في وضع خطة العالج فیما سیكون. تحدث
بسبب العدوى غیر  ,) ٪40.9(حیث خمسة عشر مریضًا یحتوون على ثمانیة عشر من النواسیر و التجاویف الوجھیة . األسباب الخلقیة والمكتسبة: إن االسباب العامة تتضمن: النتائج

وضعت في ثالثة مرضى، ) ٪9(بسبب التھابات سنیة المنشأ، وأربع نواسیر الوجھیة الخلقیة ) ٪34(سنیة المنشأ، وكان خمسة عشر مریضا یحتوون على خمسة عشر النواسیر الوجھیة 
نتیجة ألسباب الصدمة ومریض ) ٪6.8(ورم، ثالثة مرضى مع ثالثة التجاویف الوجھیة وذلك بسبب نمو ال) ٪4.5(واثنین من المرضى الذین یعانون من اثنین من النواسیر الوجھیة 

  .بسبب داء الشعیات والسبب غیر معروف لكل واحد) ٪2.2(واحد مع ناسور وجھي واحد 
میقة الجذور، أو االندمال بتشكل النسیج الظھاري من الجھاز، أو یجب أن یكون جراح الوجھ والفكین على علم باالسباب سواء ان تكون تشوھات تنمویة، أوااللتھابات الع:  االستنتاجات

 .الصرف غیر كافیة، و االجسام األجنبیة العمیقة وأنواع معینة من االلتھابات

Treatment No. of Cases % 
Endodontic treatment of lower anterior teeth. 1 2.25% 
Treatment of osteomyelitis of jaws. 5 11.4% 
Treatment of salivary gland injury fistulas. 3 7% 
Extraction and antibiotic treatment of maxillary teeth. 8 18.3% 
Extraction, antibiotic and excision of sinus tract treatment of mandibular teeth. 4 9.1% 
Surgical extraction and curettage of infected non-erupted mandibular tooth. 1 2.25% 
Tumor treatment of mandibular ameloblastoma. 2 4.5% 
Enculation of mandibular keratocyst cyst and antibiotic 1 2.25% 
Removal of foreign body from the mandible, check and TMJ. 4 9.1% 
Treatment of mandibular fractures infection. 2 4.5% 
Treatment of mandibular bone graft infection. 4 9.1% 
Treatment of TMJ arthritis in the temporal region. 1 2.25% 
Treatment of orocutaneous fistula in submandibular region. 1 2.25% 
Treatment of congenital sinuses in the lower lip and preauricular regions. 4 9.1% 
Treatment of actinomycosis of submandibular region. 1 2.25% 
Refuse treatment. 2 4.5% 
Total  44 100%