18 
 

Available at 
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jobbe/ 

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & BEHAVIOURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 
Vol. 1 No. 1,December 1, 2017 

E-ISSN: 2580-0272 
DOI: doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.001.1.02 

Formation Pattern State Defense Reserve Components in Five Countries of Asean  
 

Bayu Setiawan 
Student of Doctoral Programme of Management Science of Human Resource  
 Post-Graduate Programme of Jakarta State University 
email: sribayuprifafi@yahoo.co.id 
 

Abstract 
This research is a qualitative research, which aims to describe the ideal pattern for Indonesia in 
building the reserve component base on the result of benchmarking and review of the formation 
pattern of the Asean countries, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, the Phlilipines, and 
Thailand. The place of research were Directorate of Reserve Component and the Directorate of 
State Defense of Defense Potential, Directorate General of Defense Potential, Ministry of Defence 
of the Republic of Indonesia, Commission I of the House of Representatives, and the Defence 
Attache of the five Asean countries. The data was collected by using Focus Group Discussion 
method, questionnaires, interviews, direct observation, and document verification. Data analysis 
was perfomed using a model of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Thomas L. Saaty, such as, 
to determine actor, pattern, and actor with the highest priority and become the most important 
criteria in the formation of national defense reserve component in five Asian countries. Result of 
research on the highest priority and the most important criteria: (1) for Factor: Deterrent Power; 
(2) for Pattern: Budgeting; and (3) for Actor: the Thailand Kingdom. In this study we analyzed the 
implementation of eight key competences of Michael Zwell, ie, beliefs and values, skills, 
experience, personality traits, motivation, control emotional issues, intellectual ability, and the 
culture of the organization in six patterns for the formation of national defense reserve component 
in the Kingdom of Thailand, namely recruitment, training (development), use (utilities), closure, 
reward and punishment, and budgeting. The result of the analysis shows that the model and the 
development time in military basic training phase has the highest priority in improving the 
competence of members of the reserve component. In order to increase the deterrent power of the 
nation and country, Indonesia needs the competence of members of the reserve components that 
are national resources defense. Therefore, to improve the competence of defense reserve 
component member of the country, Indonesia needs to implement eight key competences of 
Michael Zwell into the military basic training curriculum, which is the part of a national 
programme to defend the country, and put the Ministry of Defence as a leading sector.  
 
Keywords: factor, pattern, actor, training, detterent, competence.  
 

Introduction 
The development of a state defense system that is responsive against change of threat needs 
preparedness of all elements of a nation to move together efficiently and effectively. An efficient 
and effective system integrates all the superiority intrinsic values of the indonesianism cultural 
patriotism with a constellation of geo-political and geo-strategy with archipelago characteristic 
which one form of implementation is establishment of national defense reserve component.  
Empirically, reserve components have established in many countries, either through application of 
conscription system or voluntarily, and several countries oblige their citizens, especially youth, to 
join conscription, show form of power and ability to defend the country as well high nationalism to 
their citizens. The experience of several countries in establishing state defense reserve components 
can be precious lesson and more strengthens Indonesia to establish its state defense reserve 
components.  
Through this research, the researcher made benchmarking to the experience of five ASEAN 
countries, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, and Thailand in establishment of 
defense reserve components in the respective country, namely recruitment pattern, mentoring 
pattern, usage pattern, termination pattern, reward and punishment pattern, and budgeting pattern 



 
 
 

19 
 

Available at 
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jobbe/ 

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & BEHAVIOURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 
Vol. 1 No. 1,December 1, 2017 

E-ISSN: 2580-0272 
DOI: doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.001.1.02 

 
Purpose 

This research aims to determine factors, patterns, and actors with the highest priority and become 
the most important criteria in establishment of state defense reserve component in five ASEAN 
countries, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapura, Philippines, and Thailand by using Analytical 
Hierarchi Process(AHP) model of Thomas L. Saaty; and study the application of eight competence 
factors of Michael Zwell to actors with the highest priority and become the most important criteria 
in establishment of state defense reserve component in five Asean countries, in order to determine 
the pattern most accomodate the interest of competence improvement to realize the deterrence in 
the field of state defense.  
 

Research Methods 
This research uses qualitative approach focusing on the existing symptoms and patterns in the 
subjects being studied, and the researcher was involved in carrying out data investment and in 
developing interpretation on the data found. As for the method used in this research is analytic 
descriptive based on literature study and observation which focus on the aspect of experience on 
the establishment pattern of national defense reserve component in five Asean countries, namely 
Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, and Thailand.  
 

Result and Discussion 
Based on the answer upon 309 questions in the form of questionnaires which given to the 
approximately 30 respondents (experts in defense) participant of Focus Group Discussion-
Information Sharing of Reserve Componentin the five Asean countries as referred to above, 
12,760 answers, which results then tabulated for data analysis material by using the approach of 
Analytical Hierarchie Process (AHP).  
The main goal of this hierarchy, firstly, to choose Priority Factor of 3 (three) Factors become 
strategy foundation of establishment of National defense reserve component, namely Strength 
Factor, Ability Factor, as well as State and Nation Deterrence Factor; secondly, is to choose 
Priority pattern from 6 (six) Component Establishment Patterns, namely Recruitment Pattern, 
Mentoring Pattern, Usage Pattern, Termination Pattern, Reward and Punishment Pattern, and 
Budgeting Pattern; and third, is to choose Priority of 5 (five) Asean country actors, namely 
Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, and Thailand.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Figure 1. Hierarchy Structure of Matrix Theory 
 



 
 
 

20 
 

Available at 
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jobbe/ 

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & BEHAVIOURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 
Vol. 1 No. 1,December 1, 2017 

E-ISSN: 2580-0272 
DOI: doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.001.1.02 

 
 
 
The calculation of matrix theory by using Thomas L. Saaty’s AHP Approach upon data of 
questionnaire answer tabulation result as described above resulted the priorities as follows:  
Priority benchmarking result in First Level Hierarchy Element (Factor) consisting of: Strength 
Factor, Ability Factor, as well as State and Nation Deterrence Factor, is as follows: Power 
(0.7148), Ability (0.9949), and Deterrence (1,2891). Benchmarking result with calculation based 
on such matrix theory shows that Deterrence Factor is an element with the highest priority and 
becomes the most important criteria in establishment of national defense reserve component, 
followed by Ability Factor, and Strength Factor.  
Priority benchmarking result in Second Level Hierarchy Element Level (Criteria) consisting of: 
Recruitment Pattern, Mentoring Pattern, Usage Pattern, Termination Pattern, Reward and 
Punishment Pattern, and Budgetting Pattern, is as follows: Recruitmen (0,1007), Mentoring 
(0.1270), Usage (0.1451), Termination (0.1646), Reward and Punishment(0.2088), and Budgeting 
(0.2533). Priority benchmarking result based on such matrix theory, shows that Budgeting Pattern 
in an element with the highest priority and becomes the most important criteria in choosing pattern 
in establishment of national defense reserve component, followed by Reward and Punishment 
Pattern, Termination, Usage, Mentoring and Recruitment Pattern.  
Priority benchmarking result in Third Level Hierarchy Element Level (Actor) consisting of: 
Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, and Thailand, is as follows: Indonesia (0.1345), 
Malaysia (0.1676), Singapore (0.2188), Philippines (0.2382), and Thailand (0.3303).  
The result of priority benchmarking based on the calculation of such matrix theory shows that 
Thailand is the Actor with the highest priority and becomes the most important criteria in 
establishment of national defense reserve component, followed by Philippines, Singapore, 
Malaysia, and Indonesia.  
As for the priority comparison result in Sub-Criteria Hierarchy Level, consisting of 22 Sub-
criterias, with the AHP approach of Michael Saaty can be explained in the Table 1:  
Research result upon all data collected in FGD (Forum Group Discussion), Questionnaire, 
Interview, Observation, and Document Study is as follows:  
 
Deterrence is an element with the highest priority and becomes the most important criteria; 
Budgeting pattern is an element with the highest priority and becomes the most important criteria; 
Thailand Kingdom is an Actor with the highest priority and becomes the most important criteria; 
and 
Model and time of mentoring in the phase of military basic training must be considered through 
competence improvement of participants of national defense reserve component training of 
Indonesia version. 

Discussion 
The calculation result of Thomas L. Saaty’ AHP matrix theory shows that deterrence is worth to be 
considered as reference for Indonesia in embodying qualified defense resource through 
establishment of its reserve component. State deterrence in defending itself against wide range of 
threats highly depends on the quality of defense human resource ability owned. The ability quality 
of defense human resources can be improved through application of competence factors.  
Michael Zwell conveys there are 8 (eight) factors that can influence a person’s competence 
proficiency, namely belief and values, skill, experience, personality characteristic, motivation, 
emotional issue control, intellectual ability, and organization culture. Analysis on the application 
of those eight competence factors of Michael Zwell to six patterns of establishment of national 
defense reserve component to determine the pattern most accommodates the competence 
improvement interest in order to realize deterrence in the field of defense,can be explained as 
follows (Figure 2):  
 



 
 
 

21 
 

Available at 
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jobbe/ 

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & BEHAVIOURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 
Vol. 1 No. 1,December 1, 2017 

E-ISSN: 2580-0272 
DOI: doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.001.1.02 

Table 1. The Priority Comparison Result in Sub-Criteria Hierarchy Level 

  Indonesia Malaysia Singapore Philippines Thailand 
Summon  0.1345 0.1676 0.2188 0.2382 0.3303 
Selection  0.1236 0.1583 0.1899 0.2194 0.3085 

Submission  0.1213 0.1568 0.1928 0.2249 0.3039 
Training  0.1158 1.1597 0.1683 0.2295 0.2958 

Appointment  0.1238 0.1543 0.1972 0.2249 0.2996 
Authority  0.1230 0.1518 0.1975 0.2275 0.2999 

Mentoring Period  0.1248 0.1518 0.1951 0.2263 0.2983 
Mentoring Model  0.1148 0.1516 0.1984 0.2294 0.3051 
Mentoring Status  0.1173 0.1421 0.1839 0.2332 0.3234 

Use of APP  0.1201 0.1542 0.1969 0.2318 0.2967 
Use of AWP  0.1248 0.1549 0.1934 0.2309 0.2951 
Use of NAPP  0.1155 0.1518 0.1994 0.2346 0.2986 
Use of NAWP  0.1253 0.1529 0.1974 0.2730 0.2986 

Termination by Law 0.1159 0.1523 0.1868 0.2429 0.3017 
Termination by Case 0.1090 0.1408 0.1869 0.2564 0.3006 

Termination by Sanction 0.1148 0.1472 0.1825 0.2372 0.3179 
Welfare Reward  0.1089 0.1534 0.2099 0.2308 0.2987 

Title Reward   0.1147 0.1533 0.1965 0.2292 0.3041 
Punishment as Sanction 0.1107 0.1400 0.1792 0.2441 0.3258 

Budgetting Authority 0.1090 0.1445 0.1900 0.2425 0.3139 
Budgetting Sources  0.1216 0.1487 0.1917 0.2363 0.3015 

Budgetting Supervisory 0.1170 0.1416 0.1850 0.2410 0.3124 
 
To determine the priority level of competence factors to the patterns used in establishment of 
national defense reserve component in Thailand Kingdom, the researcher gave weighting in the 
form of score on existence level of each competence factors within the referred patterns.  
Based on calculation of the total score will be obtained a pattern most accommodates the 
application of competence factors in the establishment of national defense reserve component in 
Thailand Kingdom. The referred pattern can be considered as an input to arrange alternative 
pattern for Indonesia in establishing its reserve component.  
The Implementation of the competence patterns priority level in the framework of establishment of 
national defense reserve component in Thailand Kingdom is based on calculation result by 
summing up the score value of each factor and patterns having been determined, with score 
weighting as follows: 
1 = Competence Factor Very Less Accomodated in Pattern.  
3 = Competence Factor Less Accomodated in Pattern.  
5 = Competence Factor Sufficiently Accomodated in Pattern.  
7 = Competence Factor Accomodated in Pattern.  
9 = Competence Factor Significantly Accomodated in Pattern. 
 
 
 
 



 
 
 

22 
 

Available at 
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jobbe/ 

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & BEHAVIOURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 
Vol. 1 No. 1,December 1, 2017 

E-ISSN: 2580-0272 
DOI: doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.001.1.02 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Figure 2. The matrix of the Michael Zwell’s Eight Competency Factors Implementationon Actor 
with high Priority 

 
In the above description is has explained that Thailand Kingdom applies six patterns in the 
establishment of its national defense reserve component, namely: recruitment pattern, mentoring 
pattern, usage pattern, termination pattern, reward and punishment pattern, and budgeting pattern.  
In the meantime, Michael Zwell conveyed that there are 8 Competence Factors that can affect a 
person’s competence proficieny, namely belief and values, skill, experience, personality 
characteristic, motivation, emotional issue control, intellectual ability, and organization culture.  
Therefore, analysis on the application of 8 (eight) Competence Factors to 6 (six) Patterns of 
Establishment of National Defense Reserve component, include application of 8 (eight) 
Competence Factors to Recruitment Pattern, Mentoring Pattern, Usage Pattern, Termination 
Patern, Reward and Punishment Pattern, and Budgeting Pattern.  

Table 2. The Implementation of the Eight Compentency factors 
 on the Recruitment Pattern of the Contacting Phase 

 

No Competency Factors Recruitment Factors Score Value 
1 Beliefs and Values Contacting Phase 3 
2 Skills Contacting Phase 3 
3 Experience Contacting Phase 3 
4 Character of Personality Contacting Phase 3 
5 Motivation Contacting Phase 3 
6 Emotional Issues Contacting Phase 3 
7 Intellectual Complexy Contacting Phase 3 
8 Culture of Organization Contacting Phase 3 

TOTAL 24 
 
To know whether the competence factors are accommodated in the patterns in question, in this 
article, the researcher presents example on application of 8 (eight) Competence Factors to 



 
 
 

23 
 

Available at 
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jobbe/ 

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & BEHAVIOURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 
Vol. 1 No. 1,December 1, 2017 

E-ISSN: 2580-0272 
DOI: doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.001.1.02 

Recruitment Pattern which includes five stages, namely summon stage, selection stage, 
submission stage, training stage, and appointment stage.  
The Implementation of the 8 Competence Factors, namely belief and values, skill, experience, 
personality characteristic, motivation, emotional issue control, intellectual ability, and organization 
culture, in summon stage, selection stage, submission stage, training stage, and appointment stage, 
can be described in Table 2:  
According to Michael Zwell, beliefs and values defined as a person’s beliefs and values on 
him/herself and on others which will significantly influence her or his behavior. If a person 
believes that he is not creative and innovative, he will not seek to think about a new or different 
method in doing something. Therefore, every person must think positively about himself, and to 
others and shows the characteristic of a person who thinks forward.  
Summon is one stage of recruitment pattern in the framework of establishment of its national 
defense reserve component in Thailand Kingdom applied by Ministry of Defense of Thailand 
Kingdom, supported by the elements of army, institution and all related parties.  
Based on Michael Zwell’s opinion as referred to above, there is chance in the summon procedure 
to embed beliefs and values to the candidate members of the relevant reserve component in the 
defending the country through participation as reserve component members.  
In the perspective of national defense, the efforts to embed belief and value is a strength and 
opportunity at the same time for the reserve component members to have competence so can be 
more professional in carrying out their duties. The embedding of belief and value to Thailand 
citizens is applied when a person is stated to be selected to participate in training program as 
reserve component member candidate, and it is responded by society by giving high aspiration, so 
that the relevant reserve component member candidate perceives pride accordingly.  
The officers who involve in the recruitment committee have obtained great trust from the state to 
be able to carry out the duties which indirectly implied to the belief and value embedding, even 
though technically it is done through lottery. Those who selected as the national defense reserve 
component member candidates in Thailand Kingdom, in addition obtain recognition as the best 
candidates who have complied with the requirement are also trusted to have blessing and better 
fortune than other candidates.  
However, the effort to embed “belief and value” in summon stage is not explicitly accommodated 
in summon state which constitutes one part of recruitment pattern in the framework of 
establishment of its national defense reserve component in Thailand Kingdom.  
Consequently, “belief and value” as one of the factors that can affect a person’s competence 
proficiency, is considered less accomodated in summon stage in recruitment pattern in the 
framework of establishment of national defense reserve component in Thailand Kingdom.  
Based on the priority of competence factors interest over the patterns applied in the framework of 
establishment of its national defense reserve component in Thailand Kingdom, score weighting for 
“belief and value” accomocation insummon stage in recruitment pattern is 3.  
The Synthesis on the analysis report on application of 8 (eight) factors that can affect a person’s 
competence proficiency, in six patterns in the establishment of state defense reserve component in 
Thailand Kingdom, can be explained in the following table 3:  
Synthesis matrix on application of competence factor to the establishment pattern of national 
defense reserve component in Thailand Kingdom as referred to in above, shows that model and 
mentoring time in mentoring pattern and military basic training stage in recruitment pattern, 
obtained the highest value/score.  
Consecutively, the average score achievement for each pattern are: mentoring model obtained 
value 8 (total score 64 divided by 8 competence factors); mentoring time obtained score 7 (total 
score 56 divided by 8 competence factors); and military basic training also obtained score 7 (total 
score 56 divided by 8 competence factors). This implies that based on calculation result on 
application of competence factors to the establishment the patterns of national defense reserve 
component in Thailand Kingdom, obtained result that priority of factors interest level which can 
affect a person’s competence proficiency can only accommodate to patterns, namely recruitment 
pattern in military basic training state and mentoring pattern in mentoring model and mentoring 
time.  



 
 
 

24 
 

Available at 
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jobbe/ 

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & BEHAVIOURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 
Vol. 1 No. 1,December 1, 2017 

E-ISSN: 2580-0272 
DOI: doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.001.1.02 

Table 3. The Analysis Report on Application of 8 (Eight) Factors That Can Affect A Person’s 
Competence Proficiency 

NO Competence Factors Pattern Score Number Desc 
1 a. Beliefs and Values  

b. Skills  
c. Experience  
d. Personality Characteristic  
e. Motivation   
f. Emotional Issue  
g. Intellectual Ability  
h. Organization Culture 

Recruitment 
Summon  
Selection  
Briefing  
Military Training 
Appointment 

 
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 
7+9+5+7+9+5+7+7 
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 

 
24 
24 
24 
56 
24 

 
 
 
 
Prior 

2 a. Beliefs and Values  
b. Skills  
c. Experience  
d. Personality Characteristic  
e. Motivation   
f. Emotional Issue  
g. Intellectual Ability  
h. Organization Culture 

Mentoring 
Authority 
Time 
Model  
Status 

 
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 
7+7+7+7+7+7+7+7 
9+9+7+9+9+7+7+7 
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 
 

 
24 
56 
64 
24 

 
 
Prior 
Prior 

3 a. Beliefs and Values  
b. Skills  
c. Experience  
d. Personality Characteristic  
e. Motivation   
f. Emotional Issue  
g. Intellectual Ability  
h. Organization Culture 

Use  
APP  
AWP  
NAPP  
NAWP 

 
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3  
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3  
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3  
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 

 
24 
24 
24 
24 

 

4 a. Beliefs and Values  
b. Skills  
c. Experience  
d. Personality Characteristic  
e. Motivation   
f. Emotional Issue  
g. Intellectual Ability  
h. Organization Culture 

Termination   
by Law  
by Case  
by Sanction 

 
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3  
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3  
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 

 
24 
24 
24 

 

5 a. Beliefs and Values  
b. Skills  
c. Experience  
d. Personality Characteristic  
e. Motivation   
f. Emotional Issue  
g. Intellectual Ability  
h. Organization Culture 

Reward and Punishment 
Welfare  
Title  
Punishment 

 
 
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3  
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3  
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 

 
 
24 
24 
24 

 

6 a. Beliefs and Values  
b. Skills  
c. Experience  
d. Personality Characteristic  
e. Motivation   
f. Emotional Issue  
g. Intellectual Ability  
h. Organization Culture 

Budgeting  
Authority 
Sources  
Supervisory 

 
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3  
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3  
3+3+3+3+3+3+3+3 

 
24 
24 
24 

 

 
Thus, experience of Thailand Kingdom in establishing its defense reserve component, can be the 
consideration for Indonesia in establishing its defense reserve component in order to have high 



 
 
 

25 
 

Available at 
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jobbe/ 

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & BEHAVIOURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 
Vol. 1 No. 1,December 1, 2017 

E-ISSN: 2580-0272 
DOI: doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.001.1.02 

competence and professional so that can be expected to be able to increase the state and nation 
deterrence against all kinds of threats.  
Therefore, to establish nation defense reserve component that has high competence and deterrence-
based professional, it requires programme and activity that can seek accomocation of the interest 
of competence factors in military basic training stage, supporting by mentoring model and 
mentoring time, in an establishment mechanism of national defense reserve component which is 
carried according to management cycle covering the stage of planning, organizing, implementing 
and supervising.  
In order to establish Indonesian human resources as national asset of defense become an ideal 
military deterrence which is not based on to fulfillment of the main equipments of weapon system, 
it needs competency improvement effort that is contained into the activities of military basic 
training, mentoring model, and mentoring time in the framework of establishment of national 
defense reserve component in Indonesia.  
Alternative of application of competence factor in training model for candidate member of state 
defense reserve components and state defense cadre can be explained in the following Table 4: 
  

Table 4. Competence Factor in Training Model for Candidate Member of State Defense Reserve 
Components and State Defense Cadre 

Material Competency 
Factors 

Model Curriculum 

Candidate Member: 
awareness, on citizen's right and 
obligation 
confidence in self-strength 
mutual cooperation 
never give up 
ability to cooperate 
integrity 
totality 
togetherness 
State Defend Cadre: 
mental attitude nd state defend 
character 
national and state patriotism 
anda awareness 
loyal to Pancasila as the 
ideology 
willing to scrifice for nation and 
state 
initial capability to defend state 
both psychologically and 
physically 

Believe and Value 
Skill 
Experience 
Personality 
Characteristic 
Motivation 
Pengendalian 
Emotional Issue 
Intellectual Ability 
Organization 
Culture 

Education 
Mentoring 
Training 
Coaching: 
Observation 
Discussion 
Aktif 
Follow Up 
Mentoring 
Initiation 
Cultivation 
Sepearation 
Redefinition 
Counselling 
Recognition 
Empowering 
Resourcing 

Personality mentoring 
and fighting spirit: 
Mentoring of 
knowledge and skill 
Field Study 
Basic 
Core 
Supporting 
Skill 

 
Conclusions 

Based on the approach of the AHP matrix theory of Thomas L. Saaty, in this theory has been able 
to be determined factor, pattern and actor with the highest priority and become the most important 
criteria in the establishment of state defense reserve components in 5 Asean countries, respectively 
are Deterrence Factor, Budgeting Pattern, and Thailand Kingdom Actor.  
Analysis on the implementation of eight competence factors of Michael Zwell to the actor with the 
highest priority and become the most important criteria in the establishment of state defense 



 
 
 

26 
 

Available at 
http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jobbe/ 

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & BEHAVIOURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 
Vol. 1 No. 1,December 1, 2017 

E-ISSN: 2580-0272 
DOI: doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.001.1.02 

reserve components in 5 Asean countries generated research finding that training is a the most 
accommodating sub-pattern the interest of competence improvement to realize deterrence in the 
field of state defense.  
In order to improve the competency of Indonesian citizens who participate in defending state either 
as members of state defense reserve component or as state defense cadre, so as to have deterrence 
towards wide range of threats, it needs curriculum of training implementation that accommodates 
8 (eight) Competence Factors of Michael Zwell. 
 
 
 

Bibliography 
 
Colquit, Jason A., Jeffery A. LePine and Michael J. Wesson. Organizational Behavior Improving 

Performance and Commitment it the Workplace, International Edition.New York: 
McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 2009.  

Dessler,Gary. Human Resource Management, Thirteenth Edition. London: Pearson Education, 
Inc., 2013.  

Ivancevich, John M., Robert Konopaske and Michael T. Matteson. Organizational Behavior and 
Management, Eighth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 2008.  

Mondy, R. Wayne, Robert M. Noe and Shane R. Premeaux.Human Resource Management, 7th 
Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2000.  

Noe,Raymond A., John R. Hollenbeck, Barry Gerhart and Patrick M. Wright. Fundamental of 
Human Resource Management, Fourth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies 
Inc., 2011.  

Robbins, Stephen P. Organizational Behavior, Tenth Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2003.  
Wibowo. Manajemen Kinerja, Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007.  
Zwell, Michael. Creating a Culture of Competence, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000.