Journal of Childhood, Education & Society 
Volume 3, Issue 3, 2022, 275-292                                                                                                                          ISSN: 2717-638X 
DOI: 10.37291/2717638X.202233191 Research Article 

 

©2022 Journal of Childhood, Education & Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY- NC- ND license. 

 

 

Deinstitutionalisation in Hungarian child protection: Policy 
and practice changes in historical contexts 

Erzsébet Rákó1 

 
 

Abstract: The aim of the study is to present the historical changes in child protection in 
Hungary and the process of deinstitutionalisation, which is still shaping child protection 
work in this country. The research seeks to answer the question of how the process of 
institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation was implemented in Hungary in the 
socialist era and after the introduction of Act XXXI of 1997 on the Protection of Children 
and on the Directorate for Guardianship (Act XXXI of 1997), which was a milestone in the 
Hungarian child protection for the 0-3-year olds. The study employs a case study 
methodology with secondary data corpus including legislation and data provided by the 
Central Statistical Office in Hungary. The scientific approach of the study is mainly 
historical, presenting the main features of child protection in three distinct periods 1950-
1970, 1980-1995 and 1996-2018. The findings indicate that the socialist era has had a 
prevailing influence on child protection for many decades, but the years following the 
transition into democracy brought major transformation in child protection, a "transition 
of the child protection system", paving the way for the process of deinstitutionalisation 
and the emergence of alternative forms of care. 

 
Article History 
Received: 31 March 2022  
Accepted: 06 October 2022 
 
Keywords 
Institutionalisation; 
Deinstitutionalisation; 
Children’s home; Infant 
home; Foster parents; 
Socialist ideology 
 

Introduction 

Different models of child protection have developed throughout history. One of these is the model 
of Western European countries, where the transformation of large institutions, the development of small 
group homes and the strengthening of foster care began in the late 1960s (Gottesmann, 1991; Petrie, 2006; 
Trede, 1993). In contrast, the countries of Central and Eastern Europe constitute the other model, which 
was characterised by the belief in the socialist era that institutional community placement was the best 
solution for children in care.  The Western European model only began to appear in Hungary in the late 
1980s (Rákó, 2014). The study illustrates the changes in Hungary mainly through the history of the 
development of infant homes, the institutions that provide protection for children aged 0-3 years. The 
choice of the age range can be justified by the fact that all international research draws attention to the fact 
that institutionalisation is particularly harmful for 0–3-year olds (Browne et al., 2006; Finelli et al., 2018; 
Zeanah et al., 2017). The study is a descriptive case study of Hungary in terms of analysing the road it took 
from institutionalisation to deinstitutionalisation the years (Yin, 2018). Its main contribution is to a more 
nuanced understanding of present policies in Hungary and other countries in similar socio- and geo-
political contexts, which can help and guide researchers in the field of Early Childhood Education (ECE) 
to focus their attention to similar processes within their native countries.  

Nevertheless, we have not undertaken a detailed description of the entire child protection system, 
as this would go beyond the scope of this study. Instead, the focus is on the factors that influence 
deinstitutionalisation of the processes of child protection over a sixty-five year period spanning across the 
socialist era and what followed in its wake. 

 

_____________ 
1 University of Debrecen, Faculty of Education for Children and Special Educational Needs, Department of Social Pedagogy Special Education Institute, Hajdúböszörmény, 
Hungary, email: rakoe@ped.unideb.hu, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0456-5829 

https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638X.202233191
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
mailto:rakoe@ped.unideb.hu
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0456-5829


Erzsébet RÁKÓ 

276 

Historical Background 

Institutional care is referred to care that is in (often large) residential settings that are not built around 
the needs of the child nor close to a family or small-group situation, but display the characteristics typical 
of institutional culture (Michela, 2012). It is hard to outline a common definition of ‘institutions’ applicable 
to the wide diversity of national contexts across Europe. However, a few recurring features seem to 
characterise institutional care and constitute what has been referred to as ‘institutional culture’, like 
depersonalisation, rigidity of routine, block treatment, social distance. Dependence, lack of accountability 
and social, emotional and geographical isolation are also typical of this kind of care. Size and number of 
residents are not the only elements to classify a residential care facility as an institution, although they do 
appear to be proportionally related to the presence of an institutional culture: “the larger the setting, the 
fewer the chances are to guarantee individualised, needs-tailored services as well as participation and 
inclusion in the community” (European Commission, 2009, p. 9). 

In 2009, the United Nations General Assembly drew attention to the serious gaps in the application 
of the Convention on the Rights of the Child to children living outside their families or at risk of being 
separated from their families. Therefore, the international community has come together and developed 
the methodological guideline, called “Guidelines for the Alternative Care for Children”. The Guideline 
distinguishes the following forms of alternative care: 1. kinship care or family-based form of care within 
the child’s extended family; 2. foster care, when the child cannot be cared for in the family and is placed in 
a foster family prepared for the task for alternative care; 3. other forms of family-based or family-like care; 
4. residential care, provided in a non-family-based, group setting, such as care that provides safe 
accommodation and care in crisis situations, temporary residential care, and other types of short- and long-
term residential care, including residential care homes; 5. Supervised, independent housing for children 
(United Nations General Assembly, 2010). 

In Western European child protection models, alternative forms of care are implemented in the 
context of deinstitutionalisation. The concept of deinstitutionalisation in the field of child protection 
encompasses several factors. It is not only about transforming large institutions and placing children in 
family-like settings, but also about strengthening family education and developing community-based 
services at the same time and helping young people, who have come of age in the child protection system 
to leave institutions and integrate into society (Michela, 2012). Policy-driven process of reforming a 
country’s alternative care system, which primarily aims at: Decreasing reliance on institutional and 
residential care with a complementary increase in family and community-based care and services; 
Preventing separation of children from their parents by providing adequate support to children, families 
and communities; Preparing the process of leaving care, ensuring social inclusion for care leavers and a 
smooth transition towards independent living (Michela, 2012). Deinstitutionalization has been defined as 
a change in the organization of the provision of services that is implemented in three stages: (a) release of 
service users from residential institutions, (b) directing potential users to alternative institutions, and (c) 
development of community services (Baghragh, 1996). Davidson et al. (2016), in contrast to Baghragh 
(1996), distinguish two dimensions of deinstitutionalisation. De-institutionalisation policy focuses on two 
broad areas: (a) developing family support measures to prevent the separation of children from their 
family; and (b) developing family-based care placements in order to move children out of the institutions, 
and to provide options for children who will need ‘alternative care’ placements in the future (Davidson et 
al., 2016). 

Our study focuses on the factors of deinstitutionalisation identified by Baghragh (1996) and 
Davidson et al. (2016) and does not examine the third element identified by the Michela (2012), which is 
the facilitation of social integration of young people as they reach adulthood.  The child protection aspects 
of institutionalisation-deinstitutionalisation are summarised in Table 1, based on the literature.  

  



Deinstitutionalisation in Hungarian child protection: Policy... 

277 

Table 1. The child protection aspects of institutionalisation-deinstitutionalisation* 

 Institutionalisation Deinstitutionalisation 

Physical environment 
large institutions of 100-200 people, 
isolated environments often on the 
outskirts of the municipality 

small-scale, family-based care, placing 
children in foster or adoptive families 
integrated housing within the municipality 

Place of care 
the place of care may vary more often 
according to age or other factors 

striving for permanence, avoiding 
unnecessary changes in the place of care 

Educational services 

meets the child's basic needs but does 
not focus on individual needs 

family and community-based services, 
according to the individual needs of the child 

characterised by a focus on community 
education, moving children around in a 
group at the same time, performing 
daily routines (eating, dressing, etc.) at 
the same time, uniformity 

community education is implemented, with 
children meeting their needs on a flexible 
schedule, similar to family life 

rigid agenda, house rules, rigorous 
rules, sometimes over-medicalised 
approach, on-site kindergarten, school 
may also operate in the institution 

typically flexible daily schedules and rules, 
but these can be adapted to individual needs; 
separation of residence, education and leisure 
activities according to the principle of 
normalisation 

frequent hospitalisation and its various 
manifestations, impersonal treatment, 
attachment difficulties 

personal, differentiated treatment, less 
hospitalisation, attachment patterns 

Experts 
difficult to ensure the stability of carers, 
educators, educational attitude 

striving for permanence of carers and 
educators 

Keeping in touch with family 
strive to work with the family, but it is 
sporadic 

intensive efforts to foster contact with the 
family 

*Own adaptation based on literature, source: Michela (2012), European Commission (2009), Majoros, (2015) 

During the era of socialism, the Hungarian child protection system was based on total institutions, 
where the specific features of institutionalisation were clearly visible. Among the total institutions, 
Goffman (1961) includes children's homes for orphans and children in need.  The specific functioning of 
total institutions is characterised by the fact that they operate according to formal rules, and institutional 
functioning is governed by institutional bureaucracy and it is also characterised by strict order. 

In the design of children's homes from the 1950s onwards, there was a tendency to operate them 
mainly in mansions and manor houses located in the outskirts of cities. The buildings themselves were not 
suitable to accommodate children. The peripheral location reinforced the isolation of the children, and the 
isolation was further increased by the operation of the so-called on-site kindergartens and schools. The on-
site schools were an integral part of the child protection institutions, but the school requirements often 
lagged behind those of the external schools. There was a wide variety of child protection institutions, both 
in terms of accommodation and educational provision. However, all institutions have two aspects in 
common: a low standard of living compared to the national average and poor pedagogical quality. The 
main criterion for selecting teachers was not professional performance but political credibility. The foster 
homes mainly employed staff with teacher training, nevertheless the educational conditions were not 
favourable for the children. Conditions for differentiated work based on children's needs were not 
provided (Gergely, 1997). 

Since the 1950s, in Hungary there were a number of large children's homes with total institutional 
characteristics. The era was characterised by the placement of children in foster homes according to age. 
That means that there were infant homes, homes for pre-school children (3-6 years), homes for primary 
school children (6-14 years) and youth homes for children over 14 years (Rákó, 2011).  

Following the outline of the methodology in the subsequent section, the findings of the secondary 
data analysis are presented, which provide a more detailed overview of child protection as part of the 
institutionalisation-deinstitutionalisation processes of the period, and present the child protection 
provision for 0–3-year-olds through providing an overview of the history of the development of infant 
homes.  



Erzsébet RÁKÓ 

278 

Method 

The paper takes a historical approach to understand the current policy and processes of 
institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation in child protection in Hungary, informed by Foucault’s (1977) 
idea of interrogating the past in order to illuminate the present. Interpreting and evaluating past policies 
of child protection and practices of institutionalisation is informed here by knowledge and understanding 
of the present, which reveal key features of discourses and practices regarding out-of-home, alternative 
care for the youngest of children. The risk of revisionism – revisiting and re-evaluating matters of the past 
from a present perspective- is to be acknowledged here (Foucault, 1977). Attempt are made to minimise 
the risk, therefore, a mixed-methods approach was adopted working with both qualitative and quantitative 
data (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2017; Onwuegbuzie, 2012). Qualitative data (policy and legislation 
documents) was interrogated corroboratively with statistical data from the Central Statistical Office in 
Hungary for the examined period. Secondary analysis of child protection statistics, as well as the analysis 
of the statistical data and content analysis of relevant legislations took place (White & Marsh, 2006), using 
statistics to aid the interpretation of policy and legislation. This enabled a clear focus on the question that 
frames this paper: how did the alternative forms of care develop in Hungarian child protection for 0-3-
year-olds during socialism and in the following years. Interrogation of the data corpus helped identify 
three distinct historical periods of child protection, each with features that are identified as typical during 
those years. These are presented in the next three sub-sections. 

Child Protection in the 1950s-1970s: The Proliferation of Children’s Homes and the Decline of Foster 
Care 

The socialist era of the 1950s and 1960s was characterised by the strengthening of institutional 
education. This is illustrated by the data in Table 2. Children were mainly placed in institutions. The year 
1955 was the first year in which the proportion of children in foster care fell significantly compared to the 
proportion of all children in state care. At that time, the proportion of children in foster care had fallen to 
39.2 per cent compared with 50 per cent in 1954. By 1958, the decline in foster care service was even greater 
with only 25.2 percent of children in foster care, 30 percent fewer than in 1953. From 1960, the number of 
children in state care increased steadily. While in 1960 there were 23,408 children in state care, by 1968 the 
number of children living in residential care or foster care increased to 35,396, an increase of 50 per cent in 
just eight years. This trend continues throughout the 1960s, so that the proportion of children living in 
foster care compared to all children in state care was 27.2-33.9 per cent in the period 1960-68.  In the socialist 
era, the institutionalist tendencies intensified, and it became a general trend to create as many orphanages 
and children's villages as possible, because of the bad experiences in foster care and in the spirit of the 
ideology of community education. It was felt that the foster care network was not beneficial, and that the 
best solution for children's education was a children's home. There was an unprecedented proliferation of 
children's homes (Veczkó, 1990). 

Table 2. Child and youth protection institutions* 

Year 

Child and 
youth 

protection 
institutions 

Total number of 
children in state 

care 

Of which 
In children's 

home 
In foster care 

 
children placed in care as a 

proportion of the total number 
of children in care 

number of children 
placed 

Number of people in hosted in state care 
1953 15 25 055 11302 54,8% 13753 
1954 15 23314 11644 50,0% 11670 
1955 15 19327 11748 39,2% 7579 
1956 15 19153 12368 35,4% 6785 
1957 14 19931 14455 27,4% 5476 
1958 14 21542 16107 25,2% 5435 
1959 14 22600 17038 24,6% 5562 
1960 14 23408 17213 26,4% 6195 
1961 14 25340 18537 26,8% 6803 



Deinstitutionalisation in Hungarian child protection: Policy... 

279 

1962 17 27277 19844 27,2% 7433 
1963 18 29365 21150 27,9% 8215 
1964 19 31380 21243 32,3% 10137 
1965 19 33420 22181 33,6% 11239 
1966 19 33584 22175 33,9% 11409 
1967 19 34483 22939 33,4% 11544 
1968 20 35077 23710 32,4% 11367 
1968 20 35396 24076 31,9% 11320 

* Own adaptation based on literature, source:  Central Statistical Office (1961) (1970). Statistical Yearbook 1960. p. 331, Statistical 
Yearbook 1969. p. 396. 

For children removed from their families, priority was given to institutional care, and these children 
could only be placed in foster care if there was no room in institutions. 

“The five-year plans included efforts to create child protection institutions. NGOs have not been given any form of 
child protection functions, which have been primarily provided by the state. The government's efforts were 
characterised by the creation of large institutions, children's towns, where hundreds of children were placed. The 
development of children's homes became increasingly important.  At the same time, the foster care network is being 
eroded.” (Rákó, 2011, p. 47). 

During the period of socialism, education in the children’s homes was based on the documents 
Programme for the further development of foster care education I and the Programme for the further 
development of foster care education. The programme included the main content elements of community 
education, education for a healthy life, moral-political-ideological education, education for work and also 
leisure and cultural education (Bábosik, 1976). Typically of the period as a whole, the process of moral-
political-secular education was implemented in all levels of institutional education, including child 
protection. In ideological education, considerable emphasis was placed on moral social orientation, the 
development of the moral-political-ideological qualities of the child, education in socialist humanism, 
socialist patriotism, a socialist attitude to work, and education to discipline (Bábosik, 1976). 

Institutional education for 0–3-year-olds was provided in infant homes. The first infant home in 
Hungary was established by Emmi Pikler in 1946 in Budapest, on Lajos Lóczy Street, and was therefore 
often referred to as “Lóczy”. The number of infant homes in Hungary increased steadily, while in 1951 24 
infant homes accommodated 1,288 persons with an occupancy rate of 87.1 per cent, in 1961 there were 43 
infant homes with 3,591 places and an occupancy rate of 98.4 per cent, higher than in previous years 
(Central Statistical Office [CSO], 1961).  

The Ministry of Health was responsible for running infant homes. The infant homes were managed 
by a paediatrician, which in some cases reinforced the excessive medical approach and the relative rigidity 
of the infant homes. In infancy and toddlerhood, the daily routine is much tighter, and keeping to the 
children's daily routine is essential. Because young children are more susceptible to infections, they need 
to be protected more carefully than older children to safeguard their health (Révész, 2007). Infant homes 
fulfilled several functions within the child protection system. On the one hand, they were responsible for 
the care and upbringing of children under the age of three, whose parents were temporarily or permanently 
unable to take care of them, or whose environment endangered their development. On the other hand, they 
also allowed the mother to be present during breastfeeding. A pioneer in the field of institutional childcare, 
Emmi Pikler (1976) has developed a unique approach to infant and early childhood education based on her 
experience collected as a paediatrician and in the nurseries, which has made her internationally recognised. 
The essence of his approach is that the children's needs should be taken into account when designing their 
life, providing maximum autonomy and autonomy for the children to develop their abilities. 

“When designing the structure of the institution, it was important for her from the beginning that the children stayed 
in the same room (group), where they were placed when they arrived until they left, and that they were always looked 
after by the same carers. Although she did not yet know the results of Bowlby and Spitz's studies, she instinctively 
felt, knew, that babies needed a lot of personal attention and care, and that only adults who knew them well could 
provide it” (Majoros, 2015, p. 131). 



Erzsébet RÁKÓ 

280 

In spite of the predominance of institutional education in the period under study, innovative ideas 
appeared as early as the 1970s - although they were not implemented in practice in many places - which 
drew attention to the dangers of institutional education and the need to transform institutions. 

In the 1970s, Pikler's research in infant homes drew attention to another form of over-hospitalisation, 
the lack of volitional manifestations:  

“More than once you see whole groups of children around two years old building with the same movements, the 
same blocks, the way they've been shown. If they are given the string in their hands and prompted, they pull the toy. 
The child is a passive puppet in the hands of the adult, acting only on explicit command, not on his own initiative. 
Even a child who is able to sit still will allow himself to be fed with arms dangling, passively lying down, until the 
adult puts him on a bench or chair, hands him a spoon and tells him to eat alone” (Pikler, 1976, p.  442). 

The period of socialist child protection between 1950 and 1970 is primarily characterised by 
institutionalisation. It is typical that foster care has declined alongside large institutions of 100-200 children. 
For many decades, foster parenting was not seen as professional work, work in the home and family was 
devalued, in contrast to the family large communities were considered the primary socialisation arena, and 
the need for specialised educational skills for children who were removed from their families was 
emphasised (Homoki, 2011). 

Care for 0–3-year-olds was also provided mainly in institutional settings, in nurseries, rather than in 
care. The basic needs of the child were met in the institutions, but individual needs were not the focus. 
Community education, the uniformization of children, the movement of children in groups were all 
characteristic of the era and also the emergence of classic and newer forms of hospitalisation. Alternative 
forms of care were not common in this era. 

The 1980s and 1990s Rudimentary Forms of Deinstitutionalisation and Renewed Emphasis on Family 
Care 

The 1980s brought new changes in child protection. The changes were opened up by the fact that it 
became clear that socialist society could not eliminate the factors that disrupted children's development. 
Thus, the political attitude towards child protection issues became more “permissive”. In 1979, as a result 
of the social crisis phenomena, national research was launched as an interministerial research priority 
under the title “Complex study of social integration disorders” (hereinafter referred to as “SID”). This then 
played an important role in all the efforts to modernise child protection before the political regime change 
in 1990. The results of the SID research provided a theoretical background and reference for the reform 
efforts of child protection workers, which “legalised” these efforts (Domszky, 1994). 

The research on Social Integration Disorders was launched in 1981 on 6 themes and nearly 40 topics. 
The aim of the research was to explore deviance, although this term was not used.  The rationale for the 
research was that these social phenomena were occurring on a massive scale, causing significant harm to 
both individuals and the society. And the institutions to deal with the problems were not in place during 
this period (Rákó, 2011).  

In 1978, 8.9% of the population aged 0-17 years received some form of public care. This year, 33,411 
children were in state care, placed in various institutions. The data show that, in terms of living conditions, 
most of the children concerned lived in state foster care, with around 12048 children, and a further 8995 
children in foster care (Miltényi & Münnich, 1980) thus institutional placement was still preferred to foster 
care. Institutionalisation of children in state care did not only mean placement in state foster homes. There 
were also a significant number of people placed in infant homes and special educational institutions, 
totalling more than 3,000. 

In the 1980s and 1990s, the number of infant homes and the number of children living in infant homes 
decreased. While in 1980 there were 3,759 children in infant homes in nurseries, in 1989 there were 2,376. 
The number of infant homes had fallen by six by 1989 (31) compared with 1980 (37). The situation of these 
infants is well illustrated by a study carried out by the National Association of Infant Homes, founded in 
1990, which involved 134 children in 35 infant homes. According to the research, children were placed in a 



Deinstitutionalisation in Hungarian child protection: Policy... 

281 

children's home for a variety of reasons, including neglect, poor physical condition and malnutrition. They 
came mainly from their own biological families. As a problem in the functioning of the child protection 
system, they highlighted the slow administration of the authorities in settling the fate of these children, 
and in the case of placement in foster care the lack of preparedness of the whole process. The research has 
explored the ambition to expand the scope of activities of infant homes. For example, the admission of 
mothers to the infant home regardless of the duration of breastfeeding. Hevesi et al. (1993) found that there 
was a growing push to extend the age of placement in infant homes to six years of age to avoid placement 
in another institution and to place children with their biological family or in foster care instead (Hevesi et 
al., 1993).  

From the 1980s and 1990s, the elements of institutionalisation began to change, and 
deinstitutionalisation efforts began to appear, albeit in a rudimentary form. In the 1990s, the number of 
institutions and the number of children in their care continued to decline. In 1990, 31 institutions cared for 
2147 children, by 1996, 27 institutions were operating and caring for 1670 children. 

From the 1980s onwards, there was a renewed emphasis on family care. In Hungary, until the second 
half of the 1990s, the placement of children in foster care was determined by MT Decree 2111 of 1954 About 
some organizational issues of child and youth protection and the placement was only possible if there was 
a shortage of places in educational institutions (boarding schools). Professional foster parents were 
introduced in 1986 and their position was already regulated by law. Professional foster carers were 
employed by the Child and Youth Protection Institutes. The working hours of a full-time foster carer are 6 
days a week, with a part-time or retired professional foster carer or childcare worker on days off. 
Professional foster carers look after a minimum of five and a maximum of ten children in their own home. 
The number of children to be accommodated is determined by the employer on the basis of the age, 
condition and development of the children. If they are caring for a child with a disability or a serious 
behavioural problem, they must be responsible for at least three children. – In professional foster care 
families, the mother became a full-time employee of the Child and Youth Care Institute, while the father 
or a family member became a part-time employee. Professional foster carers may also work part-time, in 
which case they are assisted by a child carer if the number of children is at least eight. Once the child reaches 
the age of adulthood, he or she can stay in the professional foster carer's household (MM Decree XXVIII of 
1986 On the Employment Relationship of Professional Foster Parents). 

In addition to professional foster parents, there were so-called traditional foster parents, who were 
not paid for their work, and who had an agreement with child and youth protection institutions. In contrast, 
professional foster carers were employed and carried out their work on a salaried basis. Innovatively, in 
Hajdú-Bihar County, a crisis programme was launched in 1995 as a tender programme, which was 
integrated into the system of foster care services. As a result of the initiative it became a practice that 
newborn babies, who used to be placed into infant homes from the hospitals, were placed with foster 
parents until they were reintegrated into the family or adopted (Rákó & Bagdács, 2011). Initiating radical 
change has also been difficult in the field of institutional education. Towards the end of the 1980s began 
the development of the so-called family models within the foster home, children's city structure and the 
organisation of family-like groups (Veressné Gönczi, 2002).   

The socio-economic-political changes of 1990 contributed significantly to the transformation of the 
child protection institutional system. The socio-economic processes that developed in parallel with the end 
of the socialist era had an impact on the living conditions of children, and the existing care and institutional 
system could no longer deal effectively with child protection problems. Hungary committed itself to 
renewing child protection by being among the first countries to ratify the  United Nations Convention on 
the Rights of the Child [UNCRC],  1989, in 1991. It states that a child who has been temporarily or 
permanently deprived of his or her family environment is entitled to special protection from the State. The 
Convention sets out the possible forms of substitute protection, which may be placement with a family, 
adoption or placement in an appropriate children's institution (UNCRC, 1989). 

In terms of child protection, the period 1980-1995 is still characterised by a strong institutionalisation, 



Erzsébet RÁKÓ 

282 

although by the end of the period some elements of deinstitutionalisation appear, including the creation of 
smaller residential units within large institutions to provide family accommodation, and the emergence of 
professional foster parents. The UNCRC (1989) emphasises the importance of deinstitutionalisation for the 
child protection systems of signatory countries, including Hungary. During this period, the first steps were 
taken to prepare for deinstitutionalisation. Among the alternative forms of care, the possibility of 
professional foster care emerged. 

Child Protection Between 1996-2018: The Increase of Placement in Foster Care? 

The Act XXXI of 1997 brought significant changes to the Hungarian child protection system, and at 
the same time the living conditions of children living in institutions also changed. In the case of placement 
of a child removed from the family, the law gives preference to placement back in the biological family, 
foster care or adoption, and lastly, placement in a children's home. The aim is for children to live in a family 
environment, rather than an institutional one, even if this is not possible within their own family. Another 
important aspect for children is to spend as little time away from their families as possible. The existing 
network of child protection institutions was also modernised in 1997. In the context of 
deinstitutionalisation, large institutions have been continuously restructured, smaller, more family-
oriented residential homes have been created, and foster care has been expanded. 

In the remaining part of the paper, we present a comparative analysis of the characteristics of child 
care before and after 1997. We will focus on the main stages of deinstitutionalisation and present the 
changes/trends affecting children aged 0-3 at each stage. After 1997, the first phase of the process involved 
the creation of small residential homes to provide family-like conditions for children. The second phase of 
deinstitutionalisation started in 2004, when more children were placed in foster care than in children's 
homes. The third phase of the process started in 2014, when more than 90 percent of children under 12, 
two-thirds of all children in specialised care, were placed in foster care. 

The 1st phase of deinstitutionalisation dates back to the years after 1997. At that time the infant 
homes, homes for pre-school children (3-6 years) and school-age children (6-14 years) which provided age-
appropriate care for children, have been discontinued. After 1997, 3-6 year olds were placed in foster care, 
special children's homes and residential homes. 6-14 year olds were mainly living in foster care, residential 
care homes and children's homes in co-educational mixed-age groups in the years after 1997. The high-
capacity children's homes have been constantly transformed, replacing them mainly by residential homes, 
which provide continuous care for 12 children. The general children's home accommodated up to forty 
children in a small community. Children's homes and residential care homes have differentiated according 
to the needs of children, and children's homes and residential care homes specialising in the care of children 
with special needs and specific needs have also appeared (According to Act XXXI of 1997 No 53 §).  There 
are two categories of residential care in Hungary: One category includes children with severe psychiatric 
or psychosocial symptoms, children who use psychoactive substances and children suspected of being 
victims of human trafficking - this category is called “special” in this study. Another form of special care 
must be provided for children under three years of age and who are chronically ill or disabled - this 
category is called “specific” in the study.) The special children's homes and residential care homes are for 
children aged 0-3 years with a persistent disability. Children with antisocial behaviour, psychoactive 
substance abuse, delinquent behaviour, dysfunctional behaviour and severe behavioural integration 
difficulties were placed in special children's homes and special residential care homes. The aftercare home 
can provide additional care if the child has reached the adult age but still meets the conditions (Act XXXI 
of 1997) 

Support for the foster care network was already growing in the 1980s and after 1997 this was the 
preferred form of accommodation to ensure family accommodation. In these years there were traditional, 
professional and special professional foster parents. The system was restructured in 2014, with new 
categories of foster carers, special and specific foster carers, better adapted to the needs of the children, and 
all foster carers now working on an employed basis. 

 



Deinstitutionalisation in Hungarian child protection: Policy... 

283 

Table 3. Number of places and children by type of care in 2005* 

Title 
Number of 

places 
authorised 

Temporarily 
placed 

Transitional 
foster care 

Permanen
tly 

fostered 
Total 

Recipient of 
aftercare 

Temporary 
care 

In 
total 

number of children 
Children's home 

Children's 
home 

3651 376 2429 107 2912 392 29 3333 

Residential 
home 

4608 105 3019 291 3415 832 2 4249 

Special 
Children's 
Home 

384 2 270 26 298 19  317 

AID and 
Children's 
home  

1032 16 603 83 704 177  879 

Aftercare 
home 

571  2  2 449  451 

Specific 
Children's 
Home 

607 58 334 67 459 62  521 

* Source: Central Statistical Office (CSO) (2006). Information on family, child and youth protection. SZMM Department of Child and 
Youth Protection. p. 53. 

The placement options for children are illustrated in Table 3. The data clearly show that in 2005, 
residential homes provided the largest number of places for children in need - 4608 in total. Accordingly, 
the majority of children (4,249) were placed in this type of institution, i.e. many more children were placed 
in institutions providing family-like conditions. 

After the introduction of Act XXXI of 1997, foster care became more preferred.  Up to the second half 
of the 1990s, the number of foster parents showed a decreasing trend, according to CSO (2004), in 1990 
there were 5373 foster parents, in 1997 there were 4809, while in 2002 there were 5020.  

Between 2002 and 2005, there has been a small but steady increase in the number of people taking 
on the task. The number increased from 5020 in 2002 to 5323 in 2005.  

Table 4. Number of foster parents in 2005* 

Number of foster parents with Professional foster parent 
Traditional foster 

parent 
Total 

0 

child in need of child 
protection 

2 474 476 
1 16 1867 1883 
2 31 1189 1220 
3 40 783 823 
4 57 384 441 
5 84 167 251 

6 or more 17 59 229 
Total 400 4923 5323 

*Source: Central Statistical Office (CSO) (2006). Information on family, child and youth protection. SZMM Department of Child and 
Youth Protection. p. 59. 

Table 4 shows that in 2005 there were 400 professional and 4,923 traditional foster parents in 
Hungary. Typically, foster carers were most likely to foster 1-2-3 children. Fewer took on the task of 
fostering 5 or more children, with 480 foster parents in 2005. The national study, which also covered foster 
carers, found that foster parent networks cannot be developed indefinitely due to a lack of suitable foster 
carers. Between 1999 and 2002, the number of foster carers increased from 4789 to 5020, according to the 
survey. The slow growth in the number of foster carers is due to the low number of applicants and the 
ageing of foster carers. The survey shows that many people apply to become foster parents in order to solve 
their existential problems, for lack of other options (State Audit Office of Hungary, 2004). 



Erzsébet RÁKÓ 

284 

 

Figure 1. Changes in the number of places in infant homes (Source: Tóth J. N. (Ed.) (2004). The state of child protection specialized 
care in the 20th century. CSO, p. 18.) 

According to Révész (2007), the Act XXXI of 1997 “forgot” about infant homes. The previous division 
of children's homes according to age has been abolished, with children aged 0-18 being placed in children's 
homes until the age of 24, subject to certain conditions. Children are placed in co-educational, mixed-age 
groups in different types of homes. 

After the introduction of the Act XXXI of 1997, the number of infant places decreased and the number 
of maternity places increased (Figure 1). According to the data in the Figure 1 while in 1990 there were 
3,690 places for infants and 144 places for mothers, in 2002 there were 1,399 places for infants and 94 places 
for mothers. Placing mothers together with their children helps to strengthen the mother-child relationship, 
and in many cases it is the only option for the mother, as some mothers have been institutionalised 
themselves.  

“It is mainly under-age mothers, in need of state care, who are placed with their newborn babies in special children's 
homes and residential homes. In some places, it is also possible for an adult mother, who may be working, to be 
admitted to the children's home with her newborn or one- or two-year-old child. In this case, the children have a place 
in a group for their age group, but spend all or most of the day with their mother.” (Majoros, 2015, p. 151). 

Until December 2005, infant homes in Hungary were under continuous restructuring. Special 
children's homes have been set up to accommodate children who need special care because of their age (0-
3 years old), children who are permanently ill and children with disabilities, who are defined by law as 
having special needs. The special children's home also provides early development, care and education for 
children under the age of 6, with disabilities and developmental delays. Children's homes can accept 
children aged 0-3 if they can provide the necessary conditions for their placement. The average number of 
people in these homes was 8.4 at its highest and 7.1 at its lowest in the period 1980-1997. The Child 
Protection Act capped the number of children in these homes at 8. 

Foster care, which would be particularly appropriate for children under three, could not always be 
provided. “For foster parents, fostering a small child is not a general task, but one that requires very specific 
knowledge and skills. In addition, some social work professionals stress that for a significant proportion of 
children, who are placed in specialised care at a young age, if the mother or parents receive special help 
and support during their visits to the nursery, they are more likely to be able to take the child home after a 
relatively short period of time” (Révész, 2007, p. 38). 

The year 2004 was a milestone in terms of deinstitutionalisation, when for the first time more than 
half (51.3 per cent) of the children in child protection care were placed with foster parents. This proportion 
has steadily increased every year according to Table 8, and by 2018 the vast majority of children, 68.3 per 
cent, were living with a foster parent (CSO, 2019). Efforts to place children in families have steadily 
increased, with the creation of foster parent networks and intensive recruitment of foster parents. In 2018, 

 

 

 

 

 
 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 

2002* 

2000* 

1990 

1980 

1970 

Places for mothers Places for children 



Deinstitutionalisation in Hungarian child protection: Policy... 

285 

49 foster parent networks were operating in Hungary. A network brings together ten foster parents and is 
supported by a variety of professionals - special needs teachers, psychologists, development teachers, etc. 
Foster parents - who look after children under three years of age or children with long-term illness or 
disabilities, i.e. children with special needs - are included in the special foster carers group.  

There are significant inequalities in the distribution of foster parents across counties, some of which 
result from inequalities in foster parent networks. 4% of settlements with more than 30 000 inhabitants had 
foster parents. Two-thirds of the foster carers lived in small settlements with fewer than 5,000 inhabitants. 
In certain counties and regions, the “population density” of foster parents is high in the North-East Regions 
in Hungary. The vast majority of these regions and municipalities are considered to be at high risk of 
poverty and are correlated with the presence of a Roma population (Babusik, 2009). There are therefore 
significant differences in the number of foster parents between counties and regions. The capital and the 
counties in the North-east regions have a high number of foster parents, nearly 60 percent of all foster 
parents are living here (CSO, 2019). 

In the public sector, from 2013, specialised care was placed under the responsibility of the Directorate 
General for Social Protection of Children, part of the Ministry of Human Resources. As well as being run 
by the state, church and non-governmental organisations are also involved in running the foster care 
networks. In terms of proportions, there is a tendency for state involvement to decline, with civil society 
networks only participating to a small extent, while church involvement has increased significantly in 
recent years (Boros, 2021). 

In 2000, there were 4,858 foster parents, rising to 5,753 in 2013. This is partly due to the recruitment 
of foster parents. The number of traditional foster carers is significantly higher than that of professional 
foster carers. While their number is only a fraction of that of traditional foster carers, the number of 
professional foster carers - as mentioned earlier, they are employed - is on the decline. While there were 
400 professional foster carers in 2005, there were only 293 in 2013 (CSO, 2014). 

The third major phase of the Hungarian deinstitutionalisation process started in 2014. This year has 
seen a number of significant changes in child protection, which have helped to achieve 
deinstitutionalisation. One such change is the restructuring of foster care. The foster parents are employed, 
for which they receive a salary, and this is accompanied by the deduction of length of service, sick pay 
entitlement and family tax allowance. Foster parents can be special or specific foster parents depending on 
the needs of the children they care for. 

The number of foster parents decreases in the years after 2013, except in 2018, when the number of 
foster parents increased minimally, 20 persons compared to 5753 in 2013. The number of special foster 
parents is much smaller in relation to the total number of foster parents, between 17 and 21 per cent. The 
exception is 2020, when the number of special foster parents increased by 278 compared to 2019 (CSO, 
2021). This increase in numbers could be due to the introduction of a cash benefit for foster parents, the 
childcare allowance in 2020, which foster parents can claim up to the age of two of the children. This is 
another way the government is trying to help increase the number of special foster parents. 

Caring for children with special needs is no small task for foster parents. Based on the literature, the 
most significant problem is the foster care of children under three years of age with a permanent illness or 
disability. 

“Foster parents rarely take on the care of young children with a severe disability, permanent illness or health 
impairment because they lack the material resources and specialised skills to provide for them safely and 
professionally. A further problem is the difficulty of access to development and therapy services in the area” 
(Gyarmati et al., 2018, p. 79). 

In a study conducted by Gyarmati et al. (2018), they found that most of the children with special 
needs aged 0-6 years in the study were directly introduced into the foster care network from the biological 
family, and secondarily directly from the hospital. The move from foster care to institutional care is usually 
triggered by a deterioration in the child's condition. And in the case of a transfer from another foster family, 
the most typical is the difficulty of care in that foster family. In institutions for children under three with 



Erzsébet RÁKÓ 

286 

special needs, 60% of children come from the hospital. 

Foster parents are less willing to take care of children with disabilities or long-term illnesses, and it 
is often only at the foster parent's home that it is discovered that the child has a problem or developmental 
delay.  

“By disability, the largest number of children in foster parent networks are those who show a lag in healthy 
development. Second in the order of frequency is persistent illness, and third is mental or psychological impairment. 
Children with sensory and locomotor disabilities are the least numerous. In 76 per cent of cases, the child's disability 
is diagnosed after placement in foster care, and in more than half of the children (51 per cent) the disability was first 
noticed by the foster parent” (Gyarmati et al., 2018, p. 83). 

The number of children aged 0-3 living in child protection care has been steadily increasing since 
2013. In 2013, there were 2512 children aged 0-3 living in foster families or children's homes, a number that 
increased by almost 1000 to 3464 in 2018. In 2013, the proportion of children aged 0-3 years was 13.4% of 
the total number of minors under 18 living in child protection, rising to 16.3% in 2018. This tendency is less 
prevalent among 4-5 year olds, but is also very strong among 6-9 year olds, who are not in our target group. 
Overall, it is also true that the number of children entering child protection has been steadily increasing 
since 2013. In 2013, there were 18674 children under the age of 18 living in child protection by 2018, rising 
to 21,210 (CSO, 2019). This is despite the fact that Act XXXI of 1997 aimed to reduce the number of children 
living in institutions and foster care. 

The “Hintalovon” Child Rights Foundation's 2019 report on children's rights states that not only is 
the number of children in specialised care increasing, but also the number of children under 3 years old 
entering children's homes (306 in 2018). The report states that the idea that all children under 12 admitted 
to specialised care should be placed in foster care by 31 December 2016 has not been achieved (there is a 
module specifically for special and particular foster parents) (Balogh et al., 2021). 

A higher proportion of parents give up children with severe disabilities and special needs. Children's 
homes have more children with special or specific needs, persistent illnesses and children aged 0-3 than 
foster families. Few children are placed in foster families, because the number of applicants for special and 
specific foster parent status is even lower and is steadily decreasing. An important shortcoming mentioned 
in the report is that the current foster parent training does not include a module specifically designed for 
special and specific foster parents (Balogh et. al, 2019). 

Among the alternative forms of care, family placement would be absolutely justified for 0-3 year 
olds. A number of studies (Browne, 2006; Finelli et al., 2018; Zeanah et al., 2003) have shown that children's 
development - both physical and mental - is significantly affected by being raised in a family rather than 
in an institution. One of the basic studies, which started in 2000 is the Bucharest Early Intervention Project 
(BEIP), which is the only study to use a randomised controlled design to study the benefits of 
deinstitutionalisation. Following an extensive baseline assessment, 68 of the 136 children in institutions 
(aged 6-31 months) were randomly assigned to a high-quality foster care programme that was developed 
and financed by the investigators. The other 68 children were randomly assigned to care as usual, which 
initially meant that these children remained in institutional care. All children were followed up at 30, 42 
and 54 months of age, and also at the age of 8 and 12 years. The development of children living in foster 
care was compared with that of children randomly selected to stay in the institution. 

The foster care intervention was broadly effective in enhancing children’s development, and for 
specific domains, including brain activity (EEG), attachment, language, and cognition, there appear to be 
sensitive periods regulating their recovery. That is, the earlier a child was placed in foster care, the better 
their recovery. Although the sensitive periods for recovery vary by domain, our results suggest that 
placement before the age of 2 years is key. Quality of caregiving, which was objectively coded from 
videotaped observations, was higher in the children in BEIP foster care than children who received care as 
usual (Zeanah et al., 2017). In Hungary, the number of foster care placements for 0-2 year olds has increased 
in line with the changes required in 2014 - which provided that children under 12 must be placed with a 
foster parent - and by 2018, nearly 90 percent of 0-2 year olds were living in foster care (Lux & Sebhelyi, 



Deinstitutionalisation in Hungarian child protection: Policy... 

287 

2019). 

The process of deinstitutionalisation started in the period 1996-2018 and has continued steadily, and 
is still ongoing today, 25 years on. From 1997 onwards, three significant periods of deinstitutionalisation 
emerged. A particular feature of the post-1997 period has been the transformation of large institutions into 
smaller-scale, family-style residential care homes, which has promoted the spread of alternative forms of 
care.  In residential care homes, the principle of normalisation is applied, which provides for the separation 
of living, education/work and leisure. The normalization principle also implies a normal routine of life. 
Most people live in one place, work or attend school somewhere else, and have leisure-time activities in a 
variety of places (Nirje, 1994). 

Discussion 

In this research we sought to answer the question of how did the alternative forms of care develop 
in Hungarian child protection for 0-3-year-olds during socialism and in the following years. Taking into 
account the features of institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation in the historical approach, three 
periods emerged: 1950-1970, 1980-1995, 1996-2018. 

Institutionalisation Strengthened by Socialist Ideology 

The socio-economic determinants of child protection are well reflected in the overview of the three 
periods. The socialist ideology of the 1950-70s had an impact on child protection. The socialist system of 
plan guidance and central prescription also prevailed in child protection, which further strengthened 
institutionalism. The period was characterised by the regression of foster care, given the socialist era's lack 
of trust in foster parents. It relied much more on institutional, community education, where children 
received a uniformed, ideologically expected moral-political-ideological education. Socialist-style 
education also had an impact on the 0-3 age group we studied. Among other things, the children were 
given uniform clothes and performed routine activities in groups at the same time. The impact on children's 
development, in addition to hospitalisation, is that the individual needs of the child were ignored. 

The Beginnings of Deinstitutionalisation 

From a socio-economic-political point of view, the period 1980-1995 was characterised by a 
significant "softening" of socialism in Hungary. The economy has started to move from a planned economy 
to a market-based economy. Various studies were published to draw attention to social problems, and it 
was no longer possible to hide the existence of difficulties such as poverty, disadvantage, etc. The changes 
have also affected child protection, with the first cautious attempts at reform, such as the introduction of 
professional foster parents. This gave foster carers a choice, as they were also allowed to work as 
employees. However, institutional education continued to dominate child protection - institutions were 
the most trusted partners of the paternalistic state. The ideological upbringing of children, the socialist 
ideal of man, could still be realised in institutional education, where ideological education could 
presumably be better controlled and kept under control than in a foster family. However, towards the end 
of the period, reforms were also introduced in the institutions, with small family groups being set up in 
children's homes as an experiment. The living conditions of children in institutional education continued 
to be characterised by communal education and a disregard for individual needs. The isolated location of 
the institutions outside the settlements created a sense of isolation for the children, which was further 
aggravated by the operation of on-site kindergartens and schools within the child protection institutions. 
Institutionalisation remained strong in this period.  

Reforms in Child Protection and Care Practices 

The transition to democracy has significantly transformed the socio-economic structure in Hungary, 
the multi-party system and the transition to a market economy were established. A number of social 
problems also needed to be solved during these years.  Parallel to the change in the social system, there has 
also been a significant change in the approach to child protection, with the beginning of the “change of the 



Erzsébet RÁKÓ 

288 

child protection system”. More and more innovations have been introduced and after many years of 
preparatory work and summarising practical experience, the Act XXXI of 1997 on the Protection of 
Children has been introduced, which forms the basis of the deinstitutionalisation process. When the law 
was introduced, the expected impact of the targeted programmes was to reduce the number of children 
living in institutions and foster care by half in the first instance and by two-thirds in the longer term 
(Herczog, 1997). To achieve this, child welfare services to strengthen families were regulated by law.  

However, even in 2018, an unjustifiably high number of children were still in need of institutional 
care, especially children with disabilities and children with long-term illnesses. Unfortunately, in recent 
years, the number of children in child protection care in Hungary has increased, despite the original 
objective of reducing the number of children in care. This may be due, among other things, to child poverty, 
disorganised family backgrounds and the fact that primary child welfare services have few tools to 
strengthen families. 

Among the alternative forms of care, first residential care and then, gradually since 2004, foster care 
have played an increasing role in the protection of children. In addition, the forms of placement that take 
better account of the needs of children, like residential care, foster care and, in particular, special forms of 
foster care have been further strengthened the emergence and effectiveness of alternative forms of care. 
The working conditions of foster carers have also changed since 2014, from this year onwards they are 
working on an employed basis. In addition to this, child protection care has seen the emergence of 
deinstitutionalisation features such as the tendency to have stable care places, flexible daily schedules, a 
family atmosphere, individualised and differentiated treatment, stronger attachment to the foster parent 
or carer and the development of a system of private carers in institutions for 0-3 year olds. Contacts with 
biological parents are regulated and every effort is made to help the child return to his or her biological 
family. Following the amendment of the law in 2014, children under the age of 12 were mainly placed in 
foster care. The proportion of children in foster care is currently close to 90 per cent among the 0-3 age 
group we studied. 

Deinstitutionalisation has brought significant changes for the institutions. With the restructuring of 
the institutions, their location has been integrated within the municipality. The institutions are smaller and 
more open. In line with the principle of normalisation, the place of residence, the place of education and 
the place of leisure are separated. On-site kindergartens and schools have been abolished. The individual 
needs of children are taken into account more than before. Children's sense of security can be enhanced by 
seeking stability of the staff, carers/caregivers and promoting contact with the biological family.  

It is clear from the above that socio-economic changes have a significant impact on the development 
of child protection. The socialist are has had an impact on child protection for many decades. The years 
following the democratic transition also brought a major transformation in child protection, a “transition 
of the child protection system”, paving the way for the deinstitutionalisation process and the emergence of 
alternative forms of care. 

Conclusion 

The study findings suggest that the process of deinstitutionalisation is underway in Hungarian child 
protection, but it is not yet complete. Hungarian child protection has been trying for a long time - at least 
25 years - to use alternative forms of care and to strengthen deinstitutionalisation. The ratification of the 
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which took place in Hungary in 1991, was a major step forward 
in the process. Looking at the different eras, it is clear that a number of laws and amendments have been 
passed, but some of these are still to be implemented. Legislation alone is worth little, the implementation 
is the key issue. 

Hungarian child protection was significantly influenced by the ideological aspirations of different 
periods, which affected the social policy of the time and the child protection system within it. This article 
highlights the development of alternative forms of care, which has made significant progress, particularly 
in the recent period, i.e. 1996-2018 including the Pikler method, which gained early recognition 



Deinstitutionalisation in Hungarian child protection: Policy... 

289 

internationally whereas its spread in Hungary came later. 

Alternative forms of care emerged mainly after the introduction of the Child Protection Act in 1997, 
but their potential has not yet been fully exploited. Right now in the Hungarian system alternative forms 
of care are clearly characterised by a preference for foster care. At the theoretical level, there is a need for 
comprehensive research that could explore the current situation of foster carers. In general, empirical 
research is scarce in Hungary, despite the fact that foster care has become a widespread form of care in 
recent years. There is a need for more research into the coping skills and training of foster carers and the 
stability of this form of placement. A further research topic could be the emergence of a significant role for 
church-based providers in alternative forms of care, including foster care, and their impact on the child 
protection system. The research findings could be used to develop intervention guidelines and policy 
decisions that could lead to the improvement of practical work within a complex child protection approach. 

The limited number of places in foster care is still a challenge, while the number of children in need 
of child protection is increasing, especially in the 0-3 age group. A sobering fact is that the number of foster 
carers cannot be increased indefinitely. There are several reasons for this: on the one hand, not everyone is 
suitable for foster care, and on the other hand, our study shows that foster parents find it more difficult to 
care for children aged 0-3 years and children with long-term illnesses and disabilities. Various legislative 
and social policy measures have tried to change this situation in recent years, such as the possibility for 
those, who work as full-time foster parents to also receive childcare allowance for children aged 0-3. More 
favourable working conditions, employment opportunities and benefits as well as specialised training 
could potentially increase the number of foster carers. More attention should also be paid in their training 
to the care and education of children aged 0-3 years and children with long-term disabilities. In addition, 
recreational leave can also influence the effectiveness of foster parenting. 

As regards the alternative forms of care, taking into account the theoretical, practical and policy 
aspects, it would be worthwhile to develop a complex child protection concept based on the needs and age 
of children, which would help practical work based on research. As an element of the concept, primary 
prevention should be emphasised, i.e. the prevention of children being removed from their families. 
Intensive family preservation services (Bányai, 2015), which means intensive social work and assistance 
with the family, would be one way to do this. This includes educating parents about child-rearing and the 
needs of their children.   This service is currently underused in Hungarian child welfare services, mainly 
due to a lack of human resources. The next element of this concept is the development of foster parent 
networks and the training of foster parents, based on the research presented above. Among the alternative 
forms of care the family-based, family-like care could be improved, which is already an applicable method 
in Hungary. The law allows children to be placed with a third person, who is not necessarily a relative. 
This solution is not widespread now, but could bring a significant increase in capacity, especially for 0-3 
year olds. However, to do this, it would be necessary to make this opportunity more widely known, and 
to raise public awareness. The concept could include a presentation of the role of NGOs and churches in 
child protection, as well as a presentation of international good practices and an analysis of their potential 
for adaptation in Hungary. 

This paper also argues that all types of alternative care may be needed, to varying degrees, bearing 
in mind the needs of children. Thus, in some cases, placement in a children's home or in a residential home 
may be just as necessary as foster care in order to ensure that individual needs of the child are catered for.  
The effectiveness of child protection work can be improved by increasing the resources allocated to child 
protection and by expanding the range of services that strengthen families (thus avoiding the use of foster 
care and institutionalisation), which could be made even more effective by inter-professional cooperation 
and a more co-ordinated approach between services. 

Declarations 

Author’s Declarations 

Authors’ contributions: This is the sole work of the author. 



Erzsébet RÁKÓ 

290 

Competing interests: The author declare that she have no competing interests. 

Funding: No funding was used for this study. 

Ethics approval and consent to participate: The research reported here does not involve human subjects. 

Publisher’s Declarations 

Editorial Acknowledgement: The editorial process of this article was carried out by Eleonora Teszenyi, Anikó Varga Nagy, and Sándor 
Pálfi. 
Publisher’s Note: Journal of Childhood, Education & Society remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps 
and institutional affiliation. 

References 

Act XXXI of 1997 On the Protection of Children and on the Directorate for Guardianship. (1997). Retrieved from 
https://njt.hu/jogszabaly/1997-31-00-00  

Babusik, F. (2009). Pilot research on the foster care in Hungary. gyerekesely.hu 
http://www.gyerekesely.hu/index.php?searchword=Babusik&ordering=&searchphrase=all&Itemid=1&option=com_search 

Baghragh, L. L. (1996). Deinstitutionalisation: Promises, problems and prospects. In H. C. Knudsen, & G. Thornicroft (Eds.), Mental 
health service evaluation (pp. 3–19). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752650.003 

Balogh K., Gyurkó Sz., Lippai V., Németh B., & Sánta, N. (2019). Children's rights report 2018.  Hintalovon Child Rights Foundation. 

Balogh K., Bárdossy-Sánta N., Jánoskúti B., Kiss D., Szekeres Z, Varga A., Varga F., & Vaskuti G. (2021). Children's rights report 2020. 
Hintalovon Child Rights Foundation. 

Bábosik, I. (1976). Moral, political  education in children's homes. In Nagy S. (Ed). Program for the further development of foster care (pp. 
149-170). National Pedagogical Institute. 

Bányai, E. (2015). Intensive family preservation service - a possible variant of early childhood intervention. Journal of Early Years 
Education, 3(2), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.31074/gyntf.2015.2.176.186 

Boros, E. (2021). Changes in foster care in Hajdú-Bihar County. In E. Rákó (Ed.), Studies in the field of the child protection (pp .29-57). 
Debrecen University Press. 

Browne, K., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Johnson, R., & Chou, S. (2006). Young children in institutional care in Europe. Early Childhood 
Matters, 105. 15-18. 

Central Statistical Office (CSO) (1961). Statistical Yearbook, 1960. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal.  

Central Statistical Office (CSO) (1970). Statistical Yearbook, 1969. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal.  

Central Statistical Office (CSO) (2004). 25.1.1.19. Foster parents. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal adatai.  
https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/szo/hu/szo0019.html   

Central Statistical Office (CSO) (2006). Information on family, child and youth protection. SZMM Department of Child and Youth 
Protection. 

Central Statistical Office (CSO) (2014). 25.1.1.19. Foster parents. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal adatai.  
https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/szo/hu/szo0019.html   

Central Statistical Office (CSO) (2019). Social Statistics Yearbook, 2019.   Központi Statisztikai Hivatal. 
https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/evkonyv/szocialis_evkonyv_2019.pdf   

Central Statistical Office (CSO) (2021). 25.1.1.19. Foster parents. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal adatai.   
https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/szo/hu/szo0019.html  

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research.  SAGE Publications Inc. 

Davidson, J. C., Milligan, I., Quinn, N., Cantwell, N., & Elsley, S. (2016). Developing family-based care: Complexities in implementing 
the UN guidelines for the alternative care of children. European Journal of Social Work, 20(5), 754–769. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1255591 

Domszky, A. (1994). The situation of child and youth protection In L. Csókay, A. Domszky, V. Hazai, & M. Herczog (Eds.), International 
practice of child protection (pp. 270-324 ). Pont Publisher. 

European Commission. (2009). Report of the Ad Hoc Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care. Directorate-
General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. 
https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=89&newsId=614&furtherNews=yes 

Finelli, J., C.H. Zeanah, Jr., E. & A. T.  Smyke, (2018). Attachment Disorders in Early Childhood. In C. H. Zeanah Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of 

https://njt.hu/jogszabaly/1997-31-00-00
http://www.gyerekesely.hu/index.php?searchword=Babusik&ordering=&searchphrase=all&Itemid=1&option=com_search
https://doi.org/10.31074/gyntf.2015.2.176.186
https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/szo/hu/szo0019.html
https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/szo/hu/szo0019.html
https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/evkonyv/szocialis_evkonyv_2019.pdf
https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/szo/hu/szo0019.html
https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1255591
https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=89&newsId=614&furtherNews=yes


Deinstitutionalisation in Hungarian child protection: Policy... 

291 

Infant Mental Health. (pp. 452–466). The Guilford Press. 

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Penguin.  

Gergely, F. (1997). History of Hungarian child protection (1867-1991). Püski Publisher. 

Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Anchor Books. 

Gottesmann, M. (Ed). (1991). Residential child care. An international reader. Whiting & Birch Ltd.  

Gyarmati A., Czibere I., & Rácz, A. (2018). Specific characteristics of care for children aged 0-6 with disabilities or other special needs 
in child protection and specialised social care. Esély, 30(5), 76-95. http://www.esely.org/kiadvanyok/2018_5/esely_2018-5_2-
2_gyarmati-czibere-racz_gyermekvedelmi_es_szocialis.pdf  

Herczog, M. (1997). The dilemmas of child protection. Pont Publisher. 

Hevesi, K., Majoros, M., Mészáros, L., & Tardos, A. (1993). Infant homes and child protection. Esély, 4(1) 81-87. 
http://www.esely.org/kiadvanyok/1993_1/csecsemootthonok.pdf 

Homoki A. (2011). Viharsarki foster parents as shapers of postmodern childhood Viharsarki foster parents as shapers of postmodern 
childhood. ) Esély, 22(2), 86-109. 

Lux, Á. & Sebhelyi, V. (Eds.) (2019). The situation of children's rights in Hungary (2014-2019) - Alternative report on the implementation of 
the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in Hungary. Child Rights NGO Coalition. https://unicef.hu/wp-
content/uploads/2019/11/alternativ_jelentes.pdf  

Majoros, M. (2015). Special issues of children's home education. In J. Podráczky (Ed), Excerpts from Early Childhood Education (pp. 119-
161). University of Kaposvár.  

Michela, C. (2012). Deinstitusionalisation and quality alternative care of children in Europe: Lessons learned and the way forward. Eurochild. 
https://www.openingdoors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/DI_Lessons_Learned_web_use.pdf  

Miltényi, K., & Münnich, I. (1980). Studies in the field of social integration disorders. Statiszitikai Hivatal Kiadó. 

MM Decree XXVIII of 1986 On the Employment Relationship of Professional Foster Parents. (1986). Retrieved from  
https://jogiportal.hu/view/28-1986-viii-31-mm-rendelet   

MT Decree 2111 of 1954 About some organizational issues of child and youth protection.  (1954). 
https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/MagyarKozlony_1954_001-
108/?pg=490&layout=s&query=magyar%20k%C3%B6zl%C3%B6ny%201954 

Nirje, B. (1994). The Normalization Principle and its Human Management Implications. SRV-VRS: The International Social Role 
Valorization Journal, 1(2) 19-23.  

Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2012). Putting the MIXED back into the quantitative and qualitative research in educational research and beyond: 
Moving toward the radical middle. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6(3), 192–219. 
http://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2012.6.3.192 

Petrie, P., Boddy, J., Cameron, C., Wigfall, C., & Simon, A. (2006). Working with children in care: European Perspectives. Open University 
Press. 

Pikler, E. (1976). Manifestations of hospitalism today. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 33(5), 441-447. http://real-
j.mtak.hu/5268/1/MagyarPszichologiaiSzemle_33.pdf  

Rákó, E. (2014). Living conditions of children placed in child protection institutions. Belvedere Publisher. 

Rákó, E. (2011). The situation of specialised child protection services. University Press Debrecen. 

Rákó, E. & Bagdács, M. (2011). Foster care placement in Hajdú-Bihar county. Csalad, gyermek, ifjusag. 
http://www.csagyi.hu/hirek/item/209-a-neveloszuloi-elhelyezes-hajdu-bihar-megyeben   

Révész, M. (2007). The institutional history of primary child protection care in Hungary - Part 2. Kapocs, 6(5), 1-41. 
http://epa.oszk.hu/02900/02943/00032/pdf/EPA02943_kapocs_2007_5_03.pdf 

State Audit Office of Hungary. (2004). Report on the control of the specialised child protection activities of local authorities.  
https://www.asz.hu/storage/files/files/%C3%96sszes%20jelent%C3%A9s/2004/0430j000.pdf?download=true 

Tóth, J. N. (Ed.) (2004). The state of child protection specialized care in the 20th century. Central Statistical Office. 

Trede, W. (1993). Reform and development of foster care education in Germany since the "foster care campaign". In Mikola J.-Volentics 
A. (Eds.), Pszichopedagógia Nevelőotthoni nevelés II. (pp. 110-1128). Textbook Publisher. 

United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (November 20, 1989). https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/crc.pdf 

United Nations General Assembly. (2010). Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children. New York. 
https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/document/united-nations-guidelines-alternative-care-children/  

http://www.esely.org/kiadvanyok/2018_5/esely_2018-5_2-2_gyarmati-czibere-racz_gyermekvedelmi_es_szocialis.pdf
http://www.esely.org/kiadvanyok/2018_5/esely_2018-5_2-2_gyarmati-czibere-racz_gyermekvedelmi_es_szocialis.pdf
http://www.esely.org/kiadvanyok/1993_1/csecsemootthonok.pdf
https://unicef.hu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/alternativ_jelentes.pdf
https://unicef.hu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/alternativ_jelentes.pdf
https://www.openingdoors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/DI_Lessons_Learned_web_use.pdf
https://jogiportal.hu/view/28-1986-viii-31-mm-rendelet
https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/MagyarKozlony_1954_001-108/?pg=490&layout=s&query=magyar%20k%C3%B6zl%C3%B6ny%201954
https://adt.arcanum.com/hu/view/MagyarKozlony_1954_001-108/?pg=490&layout=s&query=magyar%20k%C3%B6zl%C3%B6ny%201954
http://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2012.6.3.192
http://real-j.mtak.hu/5268/1/MagyarPszichologiaiSzemle_33.pdf
http://real-j.mtak.hu/5268/1/MagyarPszichologiaiSzemle_33.pdf
http://www.csagyi.hu/hirek/item/209-a-neveloszuloi-elhelyezes-hajdu-bihar-megyeben
http://epa.oszk.hu/02900/02943/00032/pdf/EPA02943_kapocs_2007_5_03.pdf
https://www.asz.hu/storage/files/files/%C3%96sszes%20jelent%C3%A9s/2004/0430j000.pdf?download=true
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/crc.pdf
https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/document/united-nations-guidelines-alternative-care-children/


Erzsébet RÁKÓ 

292 

Veczkó J. (1990). Psychological and pedagogical foundations of child protection. Textbook Publisher. 

Veressné Gönczi, I. (2002). Pedagogy of child protection. Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó. 

White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22-45. 
https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053 

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications Inc. 

Zeanah, C. H., Humphreys K.L., Fox N.A., & Nelson C.A. (2017). Alternatives for abandoned children: insights from the Bucharest. 
Early Intervention Project. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.024 

 

https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.024

	Deinstitutionalisation in Hungarian child protection: Policy and practice changes in historical contexts
	Table 3. Number of places and children by type of care in 2005*
	Table 4. Number of foster parents in 2005*