<div id="article">
      <h2 id="article_title">
        The ecology of linking technologies: toward a
        non-instrumental look at new technological repertoires
      </h2>
      <div id="article_author">
        Roc&iacute;o G&oacute;mez
      </div>
			<p>Professor, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia. </p><br />

      <h3 class="ARTICLE_SUBHEAD">
        PRESENTATION
      </h3>
      <p>
        When I began to write this paper, the first question I
        asked myself was, in what sense could an examination of
        trajectories and modes of use of the mobile telephone,
        chat, the social webs in Internet and electronic mail
        among urban young people, be considered features of
        innovation and resourcefulness? It is clear that the form
        of this innovation comes neither from the engineering,
        scientific and technical communities who <em>create</em>
        the new technological device, nor from the groupings and
        social communities which unfold and devise unexpected and
        ingenious modes of inserting the machines in the course
        of their lives. When I reviewed my notes I understood
        that the innovation that I wanted to emphasize was more
        like the anonymous, non-premeditated, emergent and
        penetrating transformations which unexpectedly change
        people's course in a silent way. Let's imagine for a
        moment how the invention of planting rice in terraces
        occurred; or respiration techniques and their effect on
        people's emotional, corporal and cognitive states; or the
        invention of popular flavors and tricks of the kitchen;
        or ways of placing and distributing food on the table.
        These are examples, perhaps a little bizarre, of a
        penetrating, emergent and silent invention, without a
        defined moment of genesis, without visibly responsible
        innovator and without the possibility of assigning an
        individualized authorship. An example which is closer to
        the topic that we are dealing with is illustrated by
        Rheingold (2004) when he refers to the introduction of
        emoticons into the technologies of exchange and the
        sending of textual messages.
      </p>
      <p>
        It was precisely Rheingold (2004) who has emphasized the
        coordinated, intelligent and massive character which
        seems to emerge from wireless webs and mobile
        communication settings, by allowing "original activities
        to be carried out and in situations where collective
        action had not been possible until now" (Rheingold,
        2004:23) The purpose of the doctoral thesis from which
        this paper is derived, consists precisely in tracing this
        collective intelligence (L&eacute;vy, 2004) in
        relationship to the genesis of links mediated by people's
        new technological repertoires. This paper suggests that
        people are generating at least eight patterns or
        configurations of the new technological repertoires in
        order to deepen, evolve, transform and renew their social
        links. The innovation refers precisely to the invention
        of these patterns which cannot be attributed to or
        explained as a pure derivation of the technical
        structures of the machines.
      </p>
      <p>
        The research was carried out in Cali (Colombia); it was
        based on the follow-up to the techno-linking dynamics of
        a group of young people in Cali over eight months: Lina,
        Sara, Yulia, Mafito, Miguel, Juan Diego and Nino. Their
        ages ranged between 17 and 22 years, they are university
        students or in their last years of high school, and they
        all maintain a very complex and interesting relationship
        with the technological tools previously mentioned. In
        methodological terms, the study used qualitative research
        strategies (in-depth interviews, ethnographic
        observations, conversations) and the use of a computer
        tool, the State Space Grids (Laney et al, 2004) which
        offers interesting alternatives for processing, analysis
        and data graphics<sup>1</sup> .
      </p>
      <p>
        The article examines the framework of technological
        relationships between human and non-human agents. It
        proposes eight techno-mediation linking systems which can
        be used for analyzing variations in the techno-linking
        settings of urban young people and questions some of the
        frequently simplifying conceptions regarding "the young
        users of new technologies".
      </p>
      <p>
        This paper has two critical assumptions. In the first
        place, this article understands that mobile phone, chat,
        and email are different and that, a mobile phone
        integrates increasingly varied functions and applications
        (chat, email, phone calls, location, social networks).
        The technological function is what is important, not the
        artifact. Second, this paper proposes a classification
        system of relations between young people and new
        technological repertoire that is not based on previous
        literature. This classification emerges from the
        empirical work, categories are "rooted" in the
        experience, as discussed for example in Grounded Theory
        (Glaser &amp; Strauss, 1967). The paper we should note,
        suggests hypotheses for discussion and presents no
        definitive conclusions.
      </p>
      <h3 class="ARTICLE_SUBHEAD">
        TECHNOLOGICAL TECHNO-MEDIATION LINKING SYSTEMS
      </h3>
      <p>
        The study allowed us to advance our understanding of the
        new technological repertoires (NTR)<sup>2</sup> not as
        isolated instruments which are added to the social life
        of the subjects, but rather as technological mediations
        for the construction of social links, that is, as
        <em>linking machines.</em> Technology users do not
        connect with discrete and individualized technologies
        (mobile telephone, chat, Internet) but rather with
        authentic <em>technological settings</em> in which both
        convergent and divergent relationships are generated. We
        call this conjunction of technologies <em>the ecology of
        technologies.</em>
      </p>
      <p>
        The way in which each subject is situated in this
        techno-linking setting varies in time and changes
        according to the linking tasks to be carried out. This
        relationship is altered according to a significant volume
        of junctures and processes which include the value and
        cost of use of the machines, their availability, and the
        manipulation skills, even customs, particular interests,
        generalization of behavior patterns and models associated
        with their use. These variations in the behavior of the
        set of technological mediations result from the way in
        which the relationships between human and non-human
        agents (Latour, 1998) start to unfold over time. The
        density of these relationships is irreplaceably,
        vigorously and extraordinarily complex. In the study it
        was possible to observe how the young participants have
        come to weave very particular stories and relationships
        with each technological repertoire. For example, Miguel,
        with his mobile telephone<sup>3</sup> , Nino and Yulia
        with their personal computers <sup>4</sup> , Mafito with
        his social webs page. The presence of these non-human
        agents along with those which are constructing a network
        of human and non-human tasks, links and co-ordinations,
        configures an authentic, cognitive and affective system
        of relationships whose scope and complexities are
        beginning to be recognized (Piscitelli, 2008; Rueda,
        2007; Rheingold, 2004; Latour, 1998; Callon, 1998; Levy,
        1995; Martin Barbero, 1987; among others).
      </p>
      <p>
        We found the weight of one technological mediation as
        compared to the others in the study's individual
        participants to be overwhelming. It is as if, at times,
        one linking machine was absorbing the others, sweeping
        them out of the technological scenario. At other times,
        there is, to put it metaphorically, a wholesome
        coexistence among non-human agents, and the subject would
        appear to concede an important place to all the
        technological presences in the operation of its links and
        affective webs.
      </p>
      <p>
        Within this ecology of technologies, we analyze how many
        technologies which tend to be central are in each
        trajectory, what place they occupy in the trajectory and
        how they relate among each other. There might be one,
        two, three or four technologies in each trajectory which
        turn out to be central to the social link transactions.
        We will address the mono-technological, bi-technological
        and multi-technological systems.
      </p>
      <p>
        The following is an analogy which can be useful for us.
        Let us imagine we have land in which we cultivate
        different species of plants. That land is the link space.
        In order to take care of and grow plants, we use
        different technologies (those technologies are the NTRs).
        It might occur that we turn to the use of predominantly
        one technology (in this case we are speaking of a
        mono-technological system). But then our crop might
        require two technologies (a bi-technological system). Or
        perhaps it needs three or more technologies (a
        multi-technological system). In our study we were
        interested in determining which is the dominant behavior
        pattern in relation to the number of technologies (one,
        two or more technologies) that the subject uses for the
        construction of their social links. When speaking of a
        mono-technological system, it does not necessarily
        indicate that the dominant technology at that moment will
        be the same that will predominate at another
        mono-technological moment in the trajectory. The
        important detail is that the subject tends to repeatedly
        appeal to only one technology in order to cultivate the
        entire link space. In this sense, we are referring to a:
      </p>
      <ul>
        <li>
          <em>Mono-technological system</em>. Within the
          technology ecology, the subject tends to establish a
          permanent and stable relationship with a given
          technology in order to transact his link space.
        </li>
        <li>
          <em>Bi-technological system</em>. Within the technology
          ecology, it is possible to detect the existence of two
          technologies which repeatedly serve the subject to
          outline and deal with a great part of the
          technologically mediated link spaces.
        </li>
        <li>
          <em>Multi-technological system</em>. Within the
          technology ecology and independently of the narrowing
          or amplification of the link spaces, the subject does
          not maintain a stable relationship with any technology
          in particular. On the contrary, he/she relates in a
          variable way with the spectrum of available
          technologies in the mediation of links. It is exactly
          the reverse of the mono-technological system.
        </li>
      </ul>
      <p>
        By making a detailed follow-up of the participants'
        trajectories, we were able to see the warp which emerges
        from the relationship between the subjects and the new
        technological repertoires and recognize the diverse place
        that these repertoires are playing in the construction of
        the participants' social links. The studies concerning
        the relationship between young people and the NTR, other
        than analyses of access to the technologies, should deal
        with the follow-up on the complex relationships which are
        established between people's lives, their vital
        experiences and the technologies.
      </p>
      <p>
        When considering the unfolding of the trajectories in
        time, the analysis allows a demonstration of how the
        technologies are articulated within the universe of links
        which each subject establishes. One might expect that
        this would entail slightly more stable trajectories, but
        what we find is constant fluctuations and variations:
        there are jumps between particular moments and diverse
        uses of the technologies within the same trajectory.
        Beginning with what we might call an <em>ecology of
        linking technologies,</em> has allowed us to define eight
        technological systems of linking techno-mediation. These
        systems correspond to types of techno-linking
        relationships in the social world and challenge the
        frequently simplified conceptions and classifications of
        the relationship between young people and technology.
      </p>
      <p>
        Table 1 presents a summary of eight techno-mediation
        linking systems concerning the relationships between
        young people and the new technological repertoires.
      </p><img src="https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/download/3153/version/2135/4110/16674/table1.png" class="article_image" width="580"
      height="268" alt="table 1">
      <div class="image_caption">
        Table 1. Gradual distribution of the technological
        systems of the techno-mediation of links.
      </div>
      <p>
        Before explaining each of the eight techno-mediation
        linking systems it is necessary to clarify some concepts:
      </p>
      <ul>
        <li>
          <em>Intensive:</em> the relationship with the
          technology becomes <em>intensive</em> when, in one
          period with a high or medium LDI <sup>5</sup> , the
          subject uses that technology to monopolize almost all
          of the link space, at the expense of the other
          technologies.
        </li>
        <li>
          <em>Refuge</em>: the relationship with the technology
          becomes a <em>refuge</em> when, in a period
          with a low LDI, the subject uses it to monopolize
          almost all of the link space, at the expense of the
          other technologies.
        </li>
        <li>
          <em>Floating</em>: the relationship with the
          technology becomes <em>floating</em> when, in a period
          with high or medium LDI, the subject uses it together
          with two or three other technologies in order to
          monopolize the link space.</em>
        </li>
        <li>
          <em>Residual</em>: the relationship with the technology
          becomes <em>residual</em> when, in a period with a low
          LDI, the subject uses it together with two or three
          technologies in order to monopolize the link space.
        </li>
        <li>
          <em>Subsidiary</em>: the relationship with the
          technology becomes <em>subsidiary</em> when, in a
          period with a high or medium LDI, the subject uses it
          together with an intensive technology. That is, the
          subsidiary is a technology which <em>accompanies</em>
          the intensive technology.
        </li>
        <li>
          <em>Coordinated</em>: the relationship with the
          technology becomes <em>coordinated</em> when, in a
          period of increase or decrease in the links, it
          coincides with the increase or decrease of the TCI of
          the technology.
        </li>
        <li>
          <em>Attenuated</em>: the relationship with the
          technology becomes <em>attenuated</em> when it deals
          with a technology with a very weak presence in the
          treatment of the LDI of the period.
        </li>
      </ul>
      <p>
        To explain each of the eight systems synthesized in Table
        1:
      </p>
      <p>
        <em>1. Mono-technological system of fixed
        technology.</em> This refers to subjects who present a
        technological system in which only one technology tends
        to be central throughout the trajectory, while the others
        tend to remain in marginal or less central positions. We
        did not find representative subjects of this kind of
        system in the study.
      </p>
      <p>
        <em>2. Mono-technological System of variable
        technologies</em>. This refers to a technological system
        with a central technology in which a kind of rotation of
        this technology appears throughout the trajectory; the
        dominant technology changes in time, while the others
        tend to remain relegated. Nino <sup>6</sup> is the only
        one of the participants in the study who adjusts to this
        system. The following figure shows a synthesis of his
        case:
      </p><img src="https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/download/3153/version/2135/4110/16669/image1.png" class="article_image" width="580"
      height="437" alt="image1">
      <div class="image_caption">
        Image 1. The image offers a look at the set of
        trajectories of all of Nino's technologies. The mobile
        telephone is in olive green, chat in light green, email
        is orange. Social webs are in red. In the vertical axis
        we find the level of link dispersion which can be low,
        medium or high. The nine levels of technological
        concentration appear in the horizontal axis. Images 1, 2,
        3, and 4 show us how the unfolding is produced in the
        linking trajectory of some of the participants.
      </div>
      <p>
        For Nino, (Image 1) one of the most particular
        technological distributions can be appreciated. There is
        a nucleus of extreme relegation at the left of the grid,
        in which the social webs (red) are concentrated, and a
        region of extreme dispersion to the right, completely
        dominated by the mobile telephone (olive green), and with
        presence of the link space in the three levels. There are
        three periods in which email (orange) occupies a
        significant centrality, in a broad link space which makes
        this dynamic very important. We are facing a vigorously
        mono-technological system in which there is a dominant
        technology (the mobile telephone) and yet, chat, in first
        place and email, in second place, eventually come to
        dominate the techno-mediation scenario. Let's look at
        this in more detail in the following Excel graphic:
      </p><img src="https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/download/3153/version/2135/4110/16664/graphic1.png" class="article_image" width=
      "580" height="257" alt="graphic1">
      <div class="image_caption">
        Graphic 1. The Excel graphic allows us to appreciate, as
        a whole, the technological concentration index (TCI) of
        Nino's four technological repertoires: olive green for
        the mobile telephone, light green for chat, orange for
        email and red for the social web. The changes in the
        linking dispersion index (LDI) are represented by the
        bold black line. The ranges of measurement for both the
        LDI and the TCI appear in the vertical axis. For the LDI
        (black line), 1 represents the low level; 2, medium
        level; and 3, high level. For the TCI of each technology,
        1 represents the low-low level; 2, low-medium level; 3,
        low-high level; 4, medium-low level; 5, medium-medium
        level; 6, medium-high level; 7, high-low level; 8,
        high-medium level; 9, high-high level. The 16 study
        periods are recorded in the horizontal axis.
      </div>
      <p>
        As pointed out earlier, the web is a completely marginal
        technology for Nino. Except for period 3, the remaining
        periods record a low technological concentration index
        for the web. Thus, for Nino, the web is an
        <em>attenuated</em> technology. In the first period, with
        a medium LDI, the mobile telephone and chat are
        <em>intensive</em> technologies, while email and the web
        are <em>attenuated</em> technologies. In period 2, the
        mobile telephone reaches a high-medium level and
        continues as an <em>intensive</em> technology; chat
        remains relegated as an <em>attenuated</em> technology,
        together with email and the web. In period 3, the mobile
        telephone and chat continue as <em>intensive</em>
        technologies and share the space of technically mediated
        links; the web continues to be marginal together with
        email which remains at a low-low level. In period 4, chat
        operates as an <em>intensive</em> technology and the
        mobile telephone behaves - for the first time in the
        trajectory - as an <em>attenuated</em> technology, the
        same as email and the web. In period 5, with a narrow
        LDI, chat becomes a <em>refuge</em> technology, while the
        mobile telephone appears as a <em>subsidiary</em>
        technology. The condition of the web and of email
        continues to be the same as in the previous period.
        Period 6 for Nino corresponds to the end of the mid-year
        vacation and generates a significant increase in link
        space, together with an increase in the TCI of email,
        which behaves as an <em>intensive</em> technology,
        together with chat. The mobile telephone becomes an
        <em>attenuated</em> technology, together with the web.
      </p>
      <p>
        In periods 7 and 8, the mobile telephone is an
        <em>intensive</em> technology, while the others remain as
        <em>attenuated</em> technologies. In period 9, Nino's
        link space narrows and the mobile telephone maintains its
        centrality; we then speak of the mobile as a
        <em>refuge</em> technology (a technology monopolizing a
        narrow link space), with three <em>attenuated</em>
        technologies (chat, email and web). In period 10, Nino's
        link space broadens and even when email gains a little
        centrality, it continues to be an <em>attenuated</em>
        technology (the same as chat and the web). The mobile
        continues as an <em>intensive</em> technology. Period 11
        offers us the only example in Nino's trajectory of
        <em>floating</em> technologies: the mobile telephone,
        email and chat. In the trajectory which ranges from
        period 12 to 14, Nino's link space (LDI) narrows
        significantly and the mobile monopolizes the treatment of
        this monopolized link space (<em>refuge</em> technology);
        only in period 14, does chat reach a low-high level, and
        yet it continues to be an <em>attenuated</em> technology
        together with email and the web. In period 15, the
        centrality of the mobile continues, but now with a medium
        LDI, it operates as an <em>intensive</em> technology. The
        other three technologies continue as <em>attenuated</em>
        technologies. In the last period, email reaches its
        highest level in the entire trajectory (medium-medium
        level) and turns into <em>intensive</em> technology
        together with the mobile telephone. This, as with the
        previous abrupt increases in the TCI of email (periods 6,
        10 11) is due to the intensification of Nino's academic
        commitments in the university.
      </p>
      <p>
        Nino tends to use one technology (the mobile phone) to
        monopolize his link space and to sustain a marginal
        relationship with the technologies for communication and
        linking machines. However, his dexterity and skills with
        the NTR are broad, and are related to the computer
        software manipulation and the creation of databases in
        order (and to always have available) his personal and
        academic files and those for his hobbies (mainly music
        and cooking). This data turns out to be significant to
        understand the relationship between young people and the
        new technological repertoires: the complexity in this
        handling and manipulation of the technologies does not
        necessarily imply intensive use as linking machines or
        vice versa.
      </p>
      <p>
        <em>3. Bi-technological System of fixed
        technology(ies</em>) This concerns a technology system
        with two central technologies and two relegated
        technologies. In our study this is the case for Miguel
        <sup>7</sup> .
      </p><img src="https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/download/3153/version/2135/4110/16670/image2.png" class="article_image" width="580"
      height="437" alt="image2">
      <div class="image_caption">
        Image 2. This image offers a look at the combined
        trajectories of all of Miguel's technologies. In olive
        green, the mobile telephone. In light green, chat. In
        orange, email. In red, the social webs. The levels of
        link space diversion appear in the vertical axis and the
        levels of technological concentration index in the
        horizontal axis.
      </div>
      <p>
        In Miguel's case, image 2 shows a landslide in the
        presence of the mobile telephone at the right of the grid
        (medium and high ranges). We find another important
        grouping on the left side (low ranges) with a significant
        presence of the social web pages (red) and slightly less
        of email (orange). Chat tends to occupy low and medium
        zones in the grid. This image points out the centrality
        of the mobile telephone for Miguel, at the expense of
        other technologies, with the eventual importance of chat
        and email to a lesser extent. Let's analyze this in
        detail:
      </p><img src="https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/download/3153/version/2135/4110/16665/graphic2.png" class="article_image" width=
      "580" height="295" alt="graphic2">
      <div class="image_caption">
        Graphic 2. The Excel graphic allows us to appreciate, as
        a whole, the technological concentration index (TCI) of
        Miguel's four technologies: olive green for the mobile
        telephone, light green for chat, orange for email and red
        for the social webs. The changes in the link dispersion
        index (LDI) are represented by a bold black line. (The
        measurement parameters are the same as those indicated in
        graph 1.)
      </div>
      <p>
        In Miguel&acute;s case, in period 1, with a high LDI, we
        see that chat and the mobile operate as
        <em>intensive</em> technologies (they both occupy a
        medium-low level), while the web and email are
        <em>attenuated</em> technologies (they are at low levels
        of the TCI). In period 2, the link space (LDI) narrows
        and the mobile telephone and chat become <em>refuge</em>
        technologies (one or two technologies to cover a small
        link space), while the web and email continue to be
        <em>attenuated</em> technologies. In period 3, Miguel's
        link space broadens and although the TCI of the web and
        email increase, they continue to be <em>attenuated</em>
        technologies. The mobile telephone is an
        <em>intensive</em> technology which has chat as its
        complement as a <em>subsidiary</em> technology in the
        process of link space coverage. A transformation occurs
        in period 4, which is similar to that of period 2: the
        link space narrows and email and mobile telephone become
        <em>refuge</em> technologies. This significant increase
        of the email TCI is due to the fact that in certain
        periods it becomes a key resource for undertaking
        schoolwork.. In period 5, the link space grows slightly,
        the TCI for email falls, the mobile telephone is
        maintained relatively high and chat increases and the web
        slightly less. The mobile telephone is the
        <em>intensive</em> technology and chat, its
        <em>subsidiary</em> with the web and email in the
        condition of <em>attenuated</em> technologies. In period
        6, the link space broadens significantly (high LDI), chat
        and email continue to be <em>attenuated</em>
        technologies, the mobile telephone is the
        <em>intensive</em> technology and the web becomes a
        <em>subsidiary</em> technology in the operation of link
        spaces. It is the only time in which the web reaches
        relatively high importance in the coverage of link
        spaces. In period 7 Miguel's intense love crisis causes a
        significant narrowing in his link space (low LDI) and all
        of the technologies become <em>attenuated,</em> except
        for the mobile telephone, which is converted into a
        <em>refuge</em> technology. As with a rebound effect, in
        the following period the link space broadened and the
        mobile telephone becomes an <em>intensive</em> technology
        with a subsidiary role less than that of chat or the web.
      </p>
      <p>
        In the span which corresponds to L9 and L10 (school
        vacations), Miguel's LDI is at a medium level, while chat
        gains centrality and becomes an <em>intensive</em>
        technology, together with the mobile telephone which
        continues to maintain its privileged space within the set
        of technologies; email and the web remain in marginal
        places and in this way they continue to be presented as
        <em>attenuated</em> technologies. In the L11 period, with
        a low LDI, the situation of email and the web continue to
        be <em>attenuated</em> technologies while mobile and chat
        turn into <em>refuge</em> technologies. In L12, school
        vacations continue and with a medium LDI, the centrality
        of the mobile is again emphasized in Miguel's trajectory:
        observe the dramatic fall of the chat LDI in this period
        and the centrality which the mobile TCI gains
        (high-high); in this period the mobile continues to be an
        <em>intensive</em> technology while the other three
        become <em>attenuated</em> technologies.
      </p>
      <p>
        In periods 13 and 14, chat again becomes an
        <em>intensive</em> technology, together with the mobile
        which does not lose its centrality. The web and email
        continue as <em>attenuated</em> technologies. In period
        15, an important event happens to Miguel: he loses his
        mobile telephone which extraordinarily triggers off the
        centrality of the web (it reaches a high-low level) as a
        technology for the transaction of social links. For the
        first time in the entire trajectory, the mobile becomes
        an <em>attenuated</em> technology, together with chat and
        email, while the web turns into a <em>refuge</em>
        technology. In period 16, the LDI rises, but the mobile
        telephone continues to be an <em>attenuated</em>
        technology while the other three technologies become
        <em>floating</em> technologies (two or three technologies
        to transact a broad link space). This fall in the TCI of
        the mobile in the last periods of Miguel's trajectory and
        the consequent rise of the TCI in the other technologies
        (mainly the web), exactly in the same periods, are a new
        confirmation of the type of centrality relationship which
        Miguel establishes with the mobile as an important
        technology for the transaction of his technologically
        mediated links.
      </p>
      <p>
        <em>4. Bi-technological system of variable technologies
        with anchorage.</em> This concerns a technologgy system
        in which there is the presence of two central
        technologies which rotate their centrality with each
        other, while the other two technologies always appear
        relegated. In the study, none of the participants'
        trajectories fall within a system of this kind.
      </p>
      <p>
        <em>5. Bi-technological system of variable technologies
        with moderate and/or opportunist anchorages.</em> This
        refers to a technology system with the presence of two
        central technologies (which can be rotating or fixed)
        with patterns of moderated and/or opportunist anchorage
        behaviors. In the study, this is the case for Yulia,
        Sara, Valentina and Lina. To illustrate, we present the
        graphics which demonstrate Sara's usage <sup>8</sup>.
      </p><img src="https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/download/3153/version/2135/4110/16671/image3.png" class="article_image" width="580"
      height="441" alt="image3">
      <div class="image_caption">
        Image 3. This image offers a look at the combined
        trajectories of all of the technologies for Sara. In
        olive green, the mobile telephone. In light green, chat.
        In orange, email. In red, the social web. The levels of
        link space dispersion appear in the vertical axis and the
        levels of the technological concentration index appear in
        the horizontal axis.
      </div>
      <p>
        Two large groupings in Sara's distribution of events can
        be appreciated in image 3. In the medium-low to the
        medium-medium spectrum of the TCI (in the center and
        right of the grid), chat and mobile telephone
        predominate. The second grouping at the low ranges, is
        devoted to the social web pages and to email, with a
        lesser presence of chat and the mobile telephone. This is
        an indication that, although there is a relative tendency
        toward the dominant techno-linking complex (chat/mobile
        telephone), this is not guaranteed. Moreover, no
        technology in the high ranges of the TCI is identified
        with the broad and medium link spaces, which indicates a
        moderation in the use of the technological repertoire
        available for the mediation of links. This is in
        significant contrast to the mono-technological system as
        we saw with Miguel (Image 2) or with another
        multi-technological, as we will see later.
      </p><img src="https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/download/3153/version/2135/4110/16666/graphic3.png" class="article_image" width=
      "580" height="441" alt="graphic3">
      <div class="image_caption">
        Graphic 3. The Excel graphic allows us to appreciate, as
        a whole, the technological concentration index (TCI) of
        Sara's four technologies. Olive green for the mobile
        telephone, light green for chat, orange for email, and
        red for the social web. The changes in the link
        dispersion index (LDI) are represented by a bold black
        line. (The measurement parameters are the same as those
        indicated in graphic 1.).
      </div>
      <p>
        In this graphic we see that in period 1, with a high link
        space, chat is an <em>intensive</em> technology with two
        subsidiary technologies: the web and the mobile
        telephone. Email is an <em>attenuated</em> technology. In
        period 2, we find a narrow link space, with three
        <em>residual</em> technologies (chat, mobile telephone
        and the web) and one <em>attenuated</em> technology,
        email. In period 3, the link space broadens and we
        encounter three <em>floating</em> technologies: chat, the
        web and the mobile telephone. Email, although it rises
        slightly, continues to be an <em>attenuated</em>
        technology. In period 4, the LDI remains high. The mobile
        telephone and chat are <em>intensive</em> technologies,
        and email and the web, <em>attenuated</em> technologies.
        In period 5, the LDI remains high and email, which had
        been marginal, becomes an <em>intensive technology</em>
        together with the mobile telephone. This sudden
        <em>intensification</em> of email, is explained by the
        fact that, in spite of the prolonged break (Easter Week),
        Sara used her email to transact her responsibilities and
        university homework. Chat and the web become
        <em>attenuated</em> technologies. In period 6, the link
        space (medium LDI) narrows slightly: chat and the mobile
        telephone become <em>intensive</em> technologies, and
        attenuate email and the web. In period 7, the LDI
        continues at a medium level, and chat and the mobile
        telephone operate as <em>refuge</em> technologies; the
        network and email become <em>attenuated</em>
        technologies. In period 8, the LDI increases slightly,
        but again, both email and the web remain
        <em>attenuated,</em> and chat and the mobile telephone
        constitute <em>intensive</em> technologies.
      </p>
      <p>
        In period 9, school vacations begin and Sara's LDI begins
        to lower slightly; the mobile continues as an
        <em>intensive</em> technology, while the other three
        operate as <em>floating</em> technologies. In the two
        following periods, Sara's LDI is at its lowest level
        (they will be the only ones throughout the trajectory
        that reach this low-low level) and the central place the
        mobile telephone occupies as a <em>refuge</em> technology
        (one technology monopolizing a narrow link space) is
        significant in these two periods; while the other three
        operate as <em>attenuated</em> technologies. In period
        12, the school vacation continues and a very particular
        situation occurs: the LDI is low and there is no weight
        of the technologies in link mediation. Sara was at a
        farm, in a state of complete removal from the four
        technological repertoires considered in this study. In
        period 13, the mobile again gains centrality and operates
        once more as an <em>intensive</em> technology, while the
        other three are <em>attenuated</em> technologies. In
        period 14 we find three <em>floating</em> technologies:
        chat, the mobile telephone and the web. Email continues
        as an <em>attenuated</em> technology. In period 15, this
        relationship of three <em>floating</em> technologies and
        one <em>attenuated</em> continues: email gains centrality
        (this is the period of midterm exams) and becomes a
        <em>floating</em> technology together with chat and the
        mobile telephone, which in spite of everything does not
        lose its centrality; while the web passes on to operate
        as an <em>attenuated</em> technology. In the last period,
        email and chat become <em>intensive</em> technologies;
        and for the first time in the entire trajectory, the
        mobile telephone turns into an <em>attenuated</em>
        technology together with the web.
      </p>
      <p>
        As can be appreciated, the structure of two groupings
        which Image 3 offers us is the result derived from this
        dynamic of the organization of link space centered around
        two technologies (mobile and chat) which lead a major
        part of the events toward the medium zone, while the
        other two (web and email) have the tendency to stay in
        low zones. For this reason we speak of a
        <em>bi-technological</em> system with a behavior pattern
        of <em>moderated anchorage</em> with two technologies
        which serve to outline and deal with a major part of the
        technically mediated link space (chat and mobile
        telephone) but with some presence of the other two
        technologies.
      </p>
      <p>
        <em>6. Multi-technological system of fixed technology and
        complementary technologies.</em>
      </p>
      <p>
        A multi-technological technological system of fixed
        technology which exists in the trajectory of an anchorage
        or moderate anchorage technology is always accompanied by
        two or three technologies which serve as a complement
        <sup>9</sup> is the case for Mafito <sup>10</sup> .
      </p><img src="https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/download/3153/version/2135/4110/16672/image4.png" class="article_image" width="580"
      height="403" alt="image4">
      <div class="image_caption">
        Image 4. The image offers a look at the combined
        trajectories of all of Mafio's technologies. In olive
        green, the mobile telephone. In light green, chat. In
        orange, email. In red, the social web. The link space
        dispersion levels appear in the vertical axis and the
        technological concentration index levels in the
        horizontal axis.
      </div>
      <p>
        In the case of Mafito it can be appreciated that in the
        cells situated in the medium and high TCIs (center and
        right of the grid) chat appears with a great deal of
        reiteration and, in a lesser degree, email and the mobile
        telephone. In these ranges, we also see an eventual
        presence of the social web pages (Image 4). Mafito offers
        us a structure of relationship in which the four
        technologies become dominant at some time in the
        trajectory, although chat occupies the predominant place.
        This is the case of a multi-technological system in which
        the centrality of one technology (chat) is always
        accompanied by other technologies which also turn out to
        be relevant within the technological framework.
      </p><img src="https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/download/3153/version/2135/4110/16667/graphic4.png" class="article_image" width=
      "580" height="257" alt="graphic4">
      <div class="image_caption">
        Graphic 4. The Excel graphic allows us to appreciate, as
        a whole, the technological concentration index (TCI) of
        Mafito's four technologies: olive green for the mobile
        telephone, light green for chat, orange for email and red
        for the social web. The changes in the link dispersion
        index (LDI) are represented by the bold black line. (The
        measurement parameters are the same as those followed in
        graphic 1.)
      </div>
      <p>
        We will not do a detailed analysis for Mafito as in the
        previous cases, however, it is worthwhile to emphasize
        how, in graph 4, we perceive the centrality of chat
        (light green line), always accompanied by other
        technologies, which also reach significant technological
        concentration levels. For Mafito, none of the
        technologies appear clearly in a situation of relegation,
        as occurs with Nino (mono-technological system of
        variable technologies) in which the social web pages are
        always situated in the low levels of the graphic.
      </p>
      <p>
        <em>7. Multi-technological System of three or more
        technologies with moderate anchorage.</em> This deals
        with a technological system in which two or three
        technologies are central in the subject's trajectory. In
        our study, we find this to be the case of Juan Diego
        <sup>11</sup> .
      </p><img src="https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/download/3153/version/2135/4110/16673/image5.png" class="article_image" width="580"
      height="257" alt="image5">
      <div class="image_caption">
        Image 5. The image offers a look at the combined
        trajectories of all of Juan Diego's technologies. In
        olive green, the mobile telephone. In light green, chat.
        In orange, email. In red, the social webs. The link space
        dispersion levels appear in the vertical axis and in the
        horizontal axis, the technological concentration index
        levels.
      </div>
      <p>
        For Juan Diego, there is a tendency toward distribution
        of events throughout the whole grid (image 5). Although
        these dispersion results are more pronounced in the case
        of the mobile telephone and chat, it can also be
        recognized in those technologies with less centrality
        such as the social web pages and email. This dispersion
        speaks of a tendency toward a non-loyal or non-habitual
        use of one or two technologies; a difference that can be
        appreciated for Miguel (Image 2). Nevertheless, this
        tendency toward technological diversity should not make
        us forget that chat as well as the mobile telephone are
        the only technologies which occupy the high ranges of the
        TCI, although, email has a significant presence in
        periods in which the link space is broad. In general, we
        find a strong grouping of events in the region to the
        left of the grid (low ranges, with the presence of all
        the technologies) and on the right, a diversity of events
        of three technologies (mobile telephone, chat and email),
        with the predominance of the mobile telephone. For Juan
        Diego there is a pole of concentration of events (to the
        left of the grid) and a wide constellation of events in
        the center and right regions. The contrast between this
        structure and that of Sara (Image 3) can be appreciated,
        with two clear groupings toward the center zone and
        toward the left. In this sense, we have with Miguel and
        Juan Diego, extreme versions of a bi-technological system
        of fixed technology, with centrality of two or three
        technologies; while with Sara, we find moderate
        formations in the distribution of events in the grid
        which end in a bi-technological system of variable
        technologies.
      </p><img src="https://openjournals.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/JoCI/article/download/3153/version/2135/4110/16668/graphic5.png" class="article_image" width=
      "580" height="257" alt="graphic5">
      <div class="image_caption">
        Graphic 5. This Excel graphic allows us to appreciate, as
        a whole, the technological concentration index (TCI) of
        Juan Diego's four technologies: olive green for the
        mobile telephone, light green for chat, orange for email
        and red for the social web. The changes in the link
        dispersion index (LDI) are represented by a bold black
        line. (The measurement parameters are the same as those
        followed in graphic 1).
      </div>
      <p>
        Without entering and pointing out details about the kind
        of technological relationship which Juan Diego
        establishes with each technology period by period, note
        that graphic 5 shows the centrality of chat and the
        significant presence of the mobile telephone in Juan
        Diego's trajectory, accompanied at certain times - by the
        centrality of email and social web pages. That is, Juan
        Diego presents a multi-technological system, with
        behavior patterns of moderate anchorage with chat and the
        mobile telephone and opportunism with social web pages
        and email.
      </p>
      <p>
        <em>8. Multi-technological System of three or more
        complementary technologies.</em> In this type of system,
        three or four technologies become complementary
        throughout the entire trajectory, without any one
        occupying an outstanding centrality; one technology at
        the most occupies a place of relegation. In our research,
        we did not find a subject who reported this system to us.
      </p>
      <h3 class="ARTICLE_SUBHEAD">
        SYNTHESIS
      </h3>
      <p>
        We have found in our study a predominance of the
        bi-technological systems of techno-mediation of link
        spaces, within which it is possible to read types of
        relationships and singular behavior patterns in each
        case. Within these cases, the bi-technological systems
        demonstrate, without exception, anchorage (moderate or
        strong) patterns of one or two technologies, and
        variations which range from opportunism in one and
        moderate anchorage in the other. Probably the
        bi-technological form may be the most frequent
        techno-mediation configuration in the social world among
        the users of the NTR used for linking purposes. Only
        through more far-reaching studies can the distribution of
        these patterns be established and differentiated.
      </p>
      <p>
        In addition to the bi-technological systems, subjects
        appear within the study with multi-technological systems,
        also with significant particularities, but who have in
        common the tendency of non-loyalty as to one or two
        technologies and the possibility of transacting link
        space (broad or narrow) and as well, almost permanently
        resorting to three or more technological mediations. At
        the opposite extreme, there is the extraordinary
        configuration of Nino, with a mono-technological system,
        supported in anchorage relationships with the mobile
        telephone, with relegation of social web pages and
        moderate relegation in the case of chat and email. What
        is characteristic of this mono-technological orientation,
        as we point out, is the tendency to erase other
        techno-mediation from the scene, monopolizing all of the
        link space with only one technology.
      </p>
      <p>
        This analysis allows us to suggest a gradation in the
        possible kinds of technological systems of link
        mediation, distributing them from left to right according
        to the number of technologies that dominate the system
        and the stable/unstable behavior of the incorporated
        technologies (Table 1).
      </p>
      <p>
        The eight technological systems considered allow us to
        identify the quantity and complexity of relationships and
        dynamics which come into play in the connections between
        urban young people and the new technological repertoires.
        As we have seen, these relationships consider the number
        of technologies involved, the level of narrowness or
        broadness of link space to be transacted and the kind of
        centrality which each technology has at a given moment.
        In this way, it cannot be easily affirmed that young
        people are blindly tied to technologies. The eight
        proposed technological systems point to ways to think
        about the enormous weight that social setting plays in
        the construction of relationships of integrated urban
        young people and the NTR. The social temporality, with
        its restrictions and possibilities (weekdays, weekends,
        three-day weekends), school dynamics with its demands
        (academic periods, vacations, final exam period, etc.)
        and the vital circumstances of each subject, point out
        particular and differentiable courses and trajectories,
        as we have attempted to demonstrate in this paper.
      </p>
      <p>
        If a metaphor could be chosen to best illustrate the
        techno-linking phenomena, it could better be selected
        from biology rather than from physics or engineering. The
        phenomena do not deal with interactive networks between
        people and machines, but rather with authentic ecosystems
        which tend to reproduce and remain in time, adapting and
        being adapted to the variations of the environment. These
        systems remind us that the supposed natural technophile
        disposition of urban young people, that is their
        inclination toward technological voracity and their dual
        tendency now toward a fate of orgiastic and tribal
        collectivism, or toward a repulsion which is almost
        socio-pathological, individualist, absorbing and
        regressive, is nothing more than a reductive
        representation of the diverse and complex gait of these
        citizens who plan their destiny and path among varied
        human and non-human agents.
      </p>
      <p>
        Studies of a more far-reaching nature with broader, more
        precise and specific populations and with more data
        collected through more sophisticated procedures; with
        data capture through, for example, palm type devices and
        individual training in order to carry out permanent and
        continuous records in real time, could offer us a map
        much more rich in nuance than this presentation, still
        schematic and limited. T Doctoral thesis from which this
        analysis is derived proposes that these techno-linking
        systems (with their nuances and variations) offers clues
        for thinking about the emergence of another kind of
        political culture, about which it is worthwhile to
        investigate.
      </p>
      <p>
        What we have been shown by carrying out this sustained
        follow-up in the trajectories of use of chat, mobile
        telephone, electronic mail and Internet social webs among
        urban young people, can be summarized in the following
        terms: if technological innovation, among other things,
        is attempting to deepen and refine modes of
        exo-convergence (machine-machine communication) or
        endo-convergence (multi-machines integrated into one), no
        less certain and powerful are the innovations which, in
        use, reveal to us another kind of convergence:
        socio-convergences; that is, the putting into
        relationship and genesis of an authentic ecology of
        machines for the service of purposes which come from the
        social world and not from the machines' architecture
        itself. In this study, these purposes refer to the
        generation and invigoration of social links. The
        inventiveness and imagination oriented toward
        strengthening, developing, diversifying and transforming
        links result in the emergence of a kind of convergence
        among machines whose explanation and development does not
        come from the nature and technical ingenuity of
        engineering in itself, but from the guidelines and social
        behaviors which differentiate and situate these. However,
        this reconfiguration as well does not come from the
        machine itself, but is explained by the genesis of an
        authentic ecological system, in which some machines
        occupy a specific niche of use, while others turn to
        other niches or are partially or completely inhibited and
        discarded (see Table 1). Beginning with local actions and
        personal and situated decisions, patterns emerge
        (ecological configurations) in which each machine
        occupies a differentiated place in the link dynamics.
        This is what makes up the kind of social innovation
        referred to by this paper. Discussion is now open.
      </p>
      <h3 class="article_subhead">
        Footnotes
      </h3>
      <p>
        <sup>1</sup> The Space State Grids (SSG) allows the
        spaces of a state of a phenomenon to be charted through
        grids and cells. Each one of the cells of the grid
        represents one of the possible states that a determined
        system can achieve through time. What is interesting is
        that these states are not defined by the software but
        rather the researchers, dealing with their own research
        questions, are the ones who define these variables.
      </p>
      <p>
        <sup>2</sup> In the study we speak of the New
        Technological Repertoires as a way of disassociating
        ourselves from the conceptions which understand
        technologies only as concrete devices. The technologies
        (from the alphabet, printing press, up to the present
        digital machines) are cognitive moulds which mobilize new
        forms of relationships of human beings with their
        interior and exterior worlds (Piscitelli, 1995). They are
        not simple instruments; they constitute <em>know-how</em>
        which transforms the lives of individuals (Mumford,
        1987).
      </p>
      <p>
        <sup>3</sup> Toward the end of the study (September,
        2009) Miguel, one of the participating young people, lost
        his mobile telephone and experienced a decided break in
        his own life experience. The loss of his mobile telephone
        - which he hadn't anticipated - implied the loss of
        telephone numbers, tips and secrets filed in the memory,
        recorded photographs and videos, dates of events,
        birthday records and agendas. During this span in his
        trajectory, he went on to establish a peripheral and
        marginal relationship with the social web pages to a much
        more vigorous and central relationship: Facebook allowed
        him to recover part of the capacity of coordinating
        actions and events, in real time, that he had received
        with the ubiquitous mobile telephone. It was not a
        question of simply buying a new device. The potential and
        real linking framework which had brought about through
        the mediating of his mobile telephone had to be
        laboriously reconstructed, and he knew that a significant
        part of such a framework was irrecoverable. But, as well,
        the relationship with <em>that</em> mobile telephone, the
        skill with the keyboard, the ringtones previously pulled
        down from the Internet, the personal configurations and
        adjustments whose use had evolved into a comfortable and
        naturalized operation of <em>his</em> telephone, a
        comfortable relationship over the months, all disappeared
        when it was lost.
      </p>
      <p>
        <sup>4</sup> In the case of Yulia, another of the
        participating young people, when we interviewed her for
        the first time, affirmed that one of her most intense
        phantoms and terrors was to lose her personal computer
        through damage or robbery. And not surprisingly, when the
        refrigeration system of her notebook collapsed in June of
        2009, Yulia simply became depressed. Her major work was
        in danger, the task that she had been forming throughout
        long and careful work on the computer: a database with
        books, class notes, bibliographical summaries and duly
        classified and coordinated university work, electronic
        addresses, files of family and personal photographs, an
        enormous framework of labor and academic relationships
        condensed in her computer. Fortunately, after extensive
        technical intervention, she was able to recover her work
        and make use of a new computer.
      </p>
      <p>
        <sup>5</sup>The link dispersion index (LDI) indicates the
        variations in the participants' link space. It points the
        means by which the set of links that the subject
        transacts broadens or narrows, while resorting to the use
        of some of the considered technological mediations.
      </p>
      <p>
        <sup>6</sup> Nino is 18 years old. He is studying Foods
        Engineering and has enjoyed cooking since he was a child.
        Technology fascinates him. He devotes a lot of time to
        deciphering secret Internet codes; he violates codes to
        get free access to the programs and files he is
        interested in; however, he is mistrustful of social web
        pages because he considers that they stimulate false
        forms of communication. He only chats with people he is
        interested in and for very concrete topics; except for
        those with his girlfriend, his chat conversations are
        always short and to the point. He is fascinated by music
        and has a systematized file of digital music of more than
        1,500 titles.
      </p>
      <p>
        <sup>7</sup> Miguel is a 20-year-old university student.
        He plays sports and studies technologies. He was a hacker
        as a young boy. Now he prefers videogames and online
        games. He has joined several forums through the Internet
        and belongs to online video-player communities. For
        Miguel the secret to happiness is to have good friends
        and to learn to enjoy the present; he doesn't like to be
        alone or to feel lonely, that's why it is so important
        for him to build a web of strong and lasting friendships.
      </p>
      <p>
        <sup>8</sup> Sara is 19 years old and loves parties and
        celebrations; nevertheless she looks sad. She is not
        satisfied with her present life. She is studying
        Economics and Finance but her dream is to become a
        graphic designer. Until a few months ago she spent almost
        all day connected to the Internet and was in permanent
        communication with her friends through chat or Facebook.
        But since she has fallen in love, Sara has begun to use
        this kind of technology less and less. Now, she says, her
        world revolves around her boyfriend.
      </p>
      <p>
        <sup>9</sup> When the technology moderately - not
        centrally - accompanies the other technologies in the
        treatment of link space in spite of not being central we
        are talking about a complentary pattern with the
        technology. This relationship presents itself mainly
        when, in the majority of the periods, the technology
        behaves as a Subsidiary Technology.
      </p>
      <p>
        <sup>10</sup> Mafito is a shy 21 year-old girl who has
        few friends and doesn't go out very much. Mafito spends
        many hours at the computer. She updates her Facebook at
        least once a week and she visits and comments in the
        social web pages of her friends every day. She is also an
        enthusiastic player of "Farm Town", a Facebook game in
        which she becomes a "virtual farmer". She devotes one or
        two hours every day to taking care of the farm: she has
        to feed the animals, harvest the fruit, fertilize the
        crops, sell farm products, buy supplies for the plants,
        etc.
      </p>
      <p>
        <sup>11</sup> Juan Diego is an 18-year-old university
        student. He has been playing videogames since he was six.
        He is a disk jockey and soccer player. He hopes to
        graduate in three years as a Recreation Professional. In
        order to be a good disk jockey, he devotes time to
        listening to music and recognizing musical structure. The
        Internet has been a key tool for learning, experiencing
        and creating his musical mixes. His greatest satisfaction
        is to be able to connect with the public and get them to
        enjoy the parties that he coordinates.
      </p>
      <h3 class="article_subhead">
        References
      </h3>
      <div class="reference">
        CALLON, Michel (1998). "El proceso de construcci&oacute;n
        de la sociedad. El estudio de la tecnolog&iacute;a como
        herramienta para el an&aacute;lisis sociol&oacute;gico"
        En: DOM&Eacute;NECH, Miquel y TIRADO, Francisco (Comp.).
        <cite>Sociolog&iacute;a sim&eacute;trica. Ensayos sobre
        ciencia, tecnolog&iacute;a y sociedad</cite>. Editorial
        Gedisa. Barcelona.
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        GLASER, Barney & STRAUSS, Anselm (1967). <cite>The
        discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative
        research</cite>. Aldine de Gruyter. New York.
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        GOMEZ, Roc&iacute;o (2010). "Procurarse sentido en la
        ciudad contempor&aacute;nea: j&oacute;venes integrados y
        nuevos repertorios tecnol&oacute;gicos". Tesis Doctoral.
        Universidad Pedag&oacute;gica Nacional, Bogot&aacute; (En
        proceso de evaluaci&oacute;n).
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        LAMEY, A., HOLLENSTEIN, T., LEWIS, M.D., & GRANIC, I
        (2004). GridWare (Version 1.1). Computer software. En:
        http://statespacegrids.org Consultado en febrero de 2009.
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        LATOUR, Bruno (1998). "La tecnolog&iacute;a es la
        sociedad hecha para que dure" En: DOM&Eacute;NECH Miquel
        y TIRADO, Francisco (Comps) <cite>Sociolog&iacute;a
        sim&eacute;trica. Ensayos sobre ciencia,
        tecnolog&iacute;a y sociedad</cite>. Gedisa. Barcelona.
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        L&Eacute;VY, Pierre (1995). <cite>&iquest;Qu&eacute; es
        lo virtual?</cite> Editorial Paid&oacute;s. Barcelona.
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        (2004). <cite>Inteligencia Colectiva. Por una
        antropolog&iacute;a del ciberespacio.</cite> Washington.
        Organizaci&oacute;n Panamericana de la Salud. En:
        http://inteligenciacolectiva.bvsalud.org. Consultado en
        agosto de 2007.
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        MART&Iacute;N BARBERO, Jes&uacute;s (1987). <cite>De los
        medios a las mediaciones. Comunicaci&oacute;n, cultura y
        hegemon&iacute;a</cite>. Editorial Gustavo Gili.
        M&eacute;xico.
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        MUMFORD, Lewis (1987). <cite>T&eacute;cnica y
        civilizaci&oacute;n</cite>. Alianza editorial. Madrid.
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        PISCITELLI, Alejandro (1995). <cite>Ciberculturas en la
        era de las m&aacute;quinas inteligentes</cite>. Editorial
        Paid&oacute;s. Buenos Aires.
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        (2008). <cite>Nativos Digitales. Dieta cognitiva,
        arquitecturas de participaci&oacute;n e inteligencia
        colectiva</cite>. Santillana. Buenos Aires.
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        RUEDA, Roc&iacute;o (2007). <cite>Para una
        pedagog&iacute;a del hipertexto. Una teor&iacute;a de la
        deconstrucci&oacute;n y la complejidad.</cite> Anthropos.
        Barcelona.
      </div>
      <div class="reference">
        RHEINGOLD, Howard (2004). <cite>Multitudes inteligentes.
        La pr&oacute;xima revoluci&oacute;n social (smart
        mobs)</cite>. Editorial Gedisa. Barcelona.
      </div>
    </div>