28

Original
ISSN 2413-0516

J Contemp Med Sci | Vol. 7, No. 1, January-February 2021: 28 – 33

Introduction
The wrong use of antibiotics in medicine has been considered 
a principal start leading to the emergence of bacteria resist to 
many antibiotics (multidrug resistance).1,2 Because of the main 
sources for transmission of extended-spectrum β-lactamase 
(ESBL)-producing bacteria to humans are animals, hence 
some measures were raised recently to reduce antimicrobial 
agents use in husbandry of animal in Europe.3 This ESBLs may 
be transmitted either directly or indirectly by contaminated 
meat products consumption.4

ESBLs bacteria can hydrolyze cephalosporin and pen-
icillin antibiotics by production of β-lactamases enzymes. 
So, Gram-negative bacteria in the intestine belonging to 
Enterobacteriaceae becomes resistant to these antibiotic classes 
when they possess an ESBL gene. ESBLs are prevalent globally 
with more than 1.5 billion people colonized Enterobacteriaceae 
especially with ESBLs.5 Most of this load falls on the develop-
ing countries, but the pervasiveness of organisms producing 
ESBLs increased in the developed countries.

There are many ESBLs groups with the same attitude but 
different in evolution. The largest ones are TEM and SHV 
β-lactamases mutants. Some critical amino acids were affected 
by the mutation resulting in enlargement in active sites and 
enable it to shield the ring of β-lactam by deflecting the oxy-
imino substitutes.6 CTX-M enzymes is the second largest 

group. These are divided into five subgroups based on sequence 
homology. Enterobacteriaceae (especially E. coli) that produce 
the CTX-M enzymes have been identified to cause urinary 
tract causing infections.7,8 Many studies reported the ESBLs 
CTX-M-type is the most frequent ESBL type worldwide.6

ESBLs are enzymes leading to increase resistance to azt-
reonam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cephalosporins, and penicil-
lin, while clavulanic acid inhibits them. The CTX-M, TEM, 
and SHV are the three major types of ESBLs. The CTX-M is 
more prevalent than TEM and SHV has a distribution among 
a broad range of clinically important bacteria.7,8

The critical patients are susceptible to infection particu-
larly, and the nature of causative agents and epidemiology can 
very extremely. The pathogens that are drug-resistant are con-
sidered as a source of concern as they carry a higher mortality 
and morbidity, and are difficult to be routinely identified by 
laboratory assays. This leads to delay in diagnosis and finding 
the appropriate therapy by antimicrobial. There is also a rising 
worry regarding the new antibiotics deficiency,9 especially for 
ESBLs Gram-negative bacteria.

Drug-resistant strains of Enterobacteriaceae are import-
ant10; thus, the aim of the present study was to determine the 
Enterobacteriaceae strains among patients who are suffering 
from diarrhea, phenotypic, and genotypic characterization of 
ESBL-producing isolates in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Enterobacteriaceae from patients 
in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: Antibiotic susceptibility and molecular 
approaches
Wafa A. Alshehri1, Tarek A. A. Moussa2*

1 Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
2 Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt. 
*Correspondence to: Wafa A. Alshehri (E-mail: waalshehri@uj.edu.sa)
(Submitted: 23 November 2020 – Revised version received: 05 December 2020 – Accepted: 19 December 2020 – Published online: 26 February 2021)

Abstract
Objective This study aimed to determine the Enterobacteriaceae strains among patients who are suffering from diarrhea, phenotypic, 
and genotypic characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Methods Stool samples were collected and cultured to determine the different Enterobacteriaceae strains. PCR was done for the isolates to 
detect the different ESBLs genes and antibiotic susceptibility against different antibiotics.
Results The total number of patients in this study was 200 (114 males [57%] and 86 females [43%]). The patients were categorized to 
teenagers (21, 10.5%), adults (92, 46%), middle age (25, 12.5%), and elderlies (25, 12.5%) according to age. Five Enterobacteriaceae strains 
were found: Enterobacter cloaca (7, 3.5%), Escherichia coli (111, 55.5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (75, 37.5%), Proteus mirabilis (6, 3.0%), and 
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1.0, 0.5%). P. aeruginosa was absent in all female patients under investigation. The response of the isolated (E. 
coli, K. pneumoniae, and E. cloaca) strains to ampicillin, cefotaxime, cefotaxime-clavulanate, ceftriaxone, cephalothin, chloramphenicol, 
ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole was highly resistant, while the response was 
highly susceptible to ampicillin sulbactam, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-clavulanate, and imipenem. The most frequent gene was bla

CTX-M
 (195) 

followed by bla
TEM

 (149), bla
SHV

 (73), and bla
OXA

 (3), while the highest pair of genes in the same organism was bla
TEM

+bla
CTX-M

 (134) followed 
by bla

SHV
+bla

CTX-M
 (64), bla

SHV
+bla

TEM
 (52), and the least pairs were bla

TEM
+bla

OXA
 (3) and bla

CTX-M
+bla

OXA
 (2). bla

SHV
+bla

CTX-M
+bla

TEM
 was found 

in 44 organisms and bla
CTX-M

+bla
TEM

+bla
OXA 

in 2 organisms only. The bla
SHV

+bla
OXA

, bla
SHV

+bla
CTX-M

+bla
OXA

, bla
SHV

+bla
TEM

+bla
OXA

, and bla
CTX-

M
+bla

TEM
+bla

OXA
+bla

SHV 
were not present in any organism under investigation.

Conclusions In teenager group, there were no organism that contained bla
OXA

 gene, while bla
OXA

 was present in E. cloaca and P. mirabilis only. 
bla

SHV
 gene was absent in E. coli but present in E. cloaca and K. pneumoniae. The most susceptible group to infection with Enterobacteriaceae 

was adults’ group, while teenage was more resist to infection.
Keywords ESBLs, Antibiotics, Molecular, Virulence genes, Enterobacteriaceae



29

Original

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Enterobacteriaceae from patients in Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaWafa A. Alshehri, Tarek A. A. Moussa

J Contemp Med Sci | Vol. 7, No. 1, January-February 2021: 28 – 33

Materials and Methods
Sample collection and isolation
Stool samples were collected from 200 diarrheal patients at 
different hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The samples were 
transferred to the laboratory within 2 h for isolation of bacte-
ria. The samples were streaked on MacConkey agar with crys-
tal violet plates (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA). After incubation at 
37°C overnight, the colonies were picked up and transferred to 
new plates. The purified isolates were identified biochemically 
by the API 20E (Biomerieux, France).

Antibiotic susceptibility and detection of ESBLs
The susceptibility of isolated bacteria to antibiotics was tested 
by the Kirby-Bauer agar disc diffusion method. Susceptibility 
to ampicillin (AMP, 10 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC, 
30 μg), ampicillin sulbactam (SAM, 20 μg), cefotaxime (CTX, 
30 μg), cefotaxime/clavulanate (CTL, 30 μg/10 μg), ceftazidime 
(CAZ, 30 μg), ceftazidime/clavulanate (CAL, 30/10 μg), ceftri-
axone (CRO, 30 μg), cephalothin (CEF, 30 μg), chloramphen-
icol (CHL, 30 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 μg), imipenem (IPM, 
10 μg), nalidixic acid (NAL, 10 μg), streptomycin (STR, 10 μg), 
tetracycline (TET, 30 μg), and trimethoprim-sulphamethox-
azole (SXT, 25 μg) was determined according to the criteria 
of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute.11 All antibiotics 
were purchased from Oxoid (Italy). The double-synergy test 
was used to screen the ESBL activity of the isolated bacteria.12

Characterization of ESBL producing bacteria
Genomic DNA was extracted from the ESBL producing bacteria 
according to the manufacturer instructions using mericon  DNA 
Bacteria (Plus) Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The encoding 
genes of β-lactamase enzymes was amplified using the primers as 
follows: blaCTX-M F-ATGTGCAGYACCAGTAARGTKATGGC, 
R-TGGGTRAARTARGTS ACCAGAAYCAGCGG (593 bp); 
blaOXA F-ACACAATACATATCAACTTCGC, R- AGTG 
TGTTTAGAATGGTGATC (813 bp); blaSHV 
F-CTTTATCGGCCCTCACTCAA, R-AGGTG 
CTCATCATGGGAAAG (327 bp); blaTEM 
F - C G C C G C A T A C A C T A T T C T C A G A A T G A , 
R-ACGCTCACCGGCTCCAGATTTAT (445 bp). PCR was 
then performed in total volume (50 µl) reaction mixture: DNA 
templet (50 ng), dNTPs (0.25mM), MgCl2 (1.5 mM), Pfu DNA 
polymerase (0.2 U), primers (50 pmol) and complete to 50 µl 
with distilled H2O. The temperature profile included

 an initial 
denaturation step at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of 
95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min and a final 
extension step at 72°C for 7 min.

Results
In modern medicine, one of the greatest challenges is antimi-
crobial resistance.13,14 The most used classes in the infection 
treatment caused by Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria are 
the combination of β-lactam/β-lactamase, cephalosporins, 
and fluoroquinolones inhibitor due to their safety, available in 
both oral forms and parenteral, and efficacy. The resistance to 
these agents would restrict the empiric treatment efficacy of 
Gram-negative infections and also, limit the options of their 
treatment.

In this study, the total patient’s number was 200 (114 
males [57%] and 86 females [43%]) (Fig. 1). The patients were 
categorized to teenagers 13–19 years (21, 10.5%), adults 20–40 
years (92, 46%), middle age 41–59 years (25, 12.5%) and elder-
lies 60 < years (25, 12.5%). It was found that the number of 
females was greater than males in teenager category only (15 
vs 6), while the number of males was greater than females in 
the rest three categories (Table 1, Fig. 2).

Five Enterobacteriaceae strains was found in the sam-
ples collected where Enterobacter cloaca (7, 3.5%), Escherichia 
coli (111, 55.5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (75, 37.5%), Proteus 
mirabilis (6, 3.0%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1.0, 0.5%) 
(Table 2). E. coli and K. pneumoniae were the most dominant 
Enterobacteriaceae strains in the patients under investigation. 
The prevalence of E. coli was noticed among males of adults, 
middle age, and elderlies categories in comparing to the other 
four strains. P. aeruginosa was absent in all female patients 
under investigation, also it is noticed that the high prevalence 
of E. cloaca in both female and male in middle age category 
(Table 3, Fig. 3).

Fig. 1 Percentage of male and female in the collected samples. 
(n=8665).

Table 1. Age grouping of the patients suffering from diarrhea.

Category Age group
Total Female Male

Number % Number % Number %

Teenager 13-19 21 10.5 15 71.4 6.0 28.6

Adults 20-40 92 46.0 38 41.3 54 58.7

Middle Age 41-59 62 31.0 25 40.3 37 59.7

Elderlies 60 < 25 12.5 8.0 32.0 17 68.0

Total - 200 100 86 43.0 114 57.0



30

Original

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Enterobacteriaceae from patients in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Wafa A. Alshehri, Tarek A. A. Moussa

J Contemp Med Sci | Vol. 7, No. 1, January-February 2021: 28 – 33

Fig. 2 Percentage of male and female in the different category. 
Male: outer circle and female inner circle.

Table 3. Distribution of ESBLs organisms among the group categories.

Category 
E. coli K. pneumoniae E. cloacae P. aeruginosa P. mirabilis

Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male

Teenager 8.0 3.0 7.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Adults 19.0 34.0 15.0 16.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

Middle Age 14.0 18.0 8.0 18.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0

Elderlies 5.0 10.0 3.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0

Total 46.0 65.0 33.0 42.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 4.0

Total 111.0 75.0 7.0 1.0 6.0

Discussion
E. coli  (65%),  Klebsiella  spp. (25%) Pseudomonas (5%), 
Enterobacter spp. (4%), and  Acinetobacter  spp. (2%) were 
detected in three tertiary care hospitals  samples in Lahore, 
Pakistan.15

A few Enterobacteriaceae species including Enterobacter 
aerogenes, E. cloacae, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P mirabilis, 
and Serratia marcescens are responsible for most infections 
produced by this family.16,17 The crucial factor in increasing 

antimicrobial resistance was the production of β-Lactamase 
in Gram-negative bacteria, like ESBLs CTX-M and SHV and 
K. pneumoniae carbapenemase.14,18 The broad spreading of the 
ESBLs has left patients and clinicians with very limited options 
in the infections treatment caused by multidrug resistant 
(MDR) Enterobacteriaceae.19–21

The antibiotic susceptibility test was performed, and 
the results presented in Table 4. The response of the isolated 
E. coli strains to ampicillin (AMP), cefotaxime (CTX), cefotax-
ime-clavulanate (CTL), ceftriaxone (CRO), cephalothin (CEF), 
chloramphenicol (CHL), ciprofloxacin (CIP), nalidixic acid 
(NAL), streptomycin (STR), tetracycline (TET), and trimetho-
prim-sulphamethoxazole (SXT) was highly resistant while the 
response of the isolated E. coli strains to amoxicillin-clavulanic 
acid (AMC) was moderately susceptible, while to ampicillin 
sulbactam (SAM), ceftazidime (CAZ), ceftazidime-clavula-
nate (CAL), and imipenem (IPM) was highly susceptible. The 
response of K. pneumoniae strains to AMP, CTX, CTL, CRO, 
CEF, CHL, CIP, STR, TET and SXT was highly resistant while 
the response to AMC and NAL was moderately susceptible, 
and to SAM, CAZ, CAL, and IPM was highly susceptible. The 
response of E. cloaca was highly resistant to AMP, AMC, CTX, 
CRO, CEF, CHL, NAL, STR, TET and SXT, while the response 
was moderately susceptible to CTL and CIP, and highly sus-
ceptible to SAM, CAZ, CAL, and IPM (Table 4).

Enterobacteriaceae isolates resistant to ceftazidime-avi-
bactam were evaluated for the presence of ESBLs encod-
ing genes.22,23 More than 99.9% of Enterobacteriaceae was 
inhibited by ceftazidime-avibactam. Only 82.2% of MDR 
Enterobacteriaceae and 64.2% of ceftriaxone-non-susceptible 

Table 2. ESBLs producing organisms detected in the collected samples.

Isolate 
Total Female Male

Number % Number % Number %

Enterobacter cloacae 7.0 3.5 3.0 42.9 4.0 57.1

Escherichia coli 111.0 55.5 46.0 41.4 65.0 58.6

Klebsiella pneumoniae 75.0 37.5 33.0 44.0 42.0 56.0

Proteus mirabilis 6.0 3.0 2.0 33.3 4.0 66.7

Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 100

Total 200 100 84 42.0 116 58.0



31

Original

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Enterobacteriaceae from patients in Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaWafa A. Alshehri, Tarek A. A. Moussa

J Contemp Med Sci | Vol. 7, No. 1, January-February 2021: 28 – 33

Fig. 3 The number of the five isolated organisms in different categories.

Table 4. The percentage of antimicrobial resistance ESBL producing isolates.

Antibiotic Abb. Conc. (µg)
E. coli (n = 111) K. pneumoniae (n = 75) E. cloacae (n = 7)

n (%) n (%) n (%)

Ampicillin AMP 10 111 (100) 75 (100) 7 (100)

Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid AMC 30 44 (39.6) 32 (42.7) 7 (100)

Ampicillin sulbactam SAM 20 11 (10) 11 (14.7) 0 (0.0)

Cefotaxime CTX 30 100 (90) 64 (85.3) 7 (100)

Cefotaxime-clavulanate CTL 30/10 88 (79.2) 53 (70.7) 3 (42.9)

Ceftazidime CAZ 30 11 (10) 11 (14.7) 1 (14.3)

Ceftazidime-clavulanate CAL 30/10 9 (8.1) 8 (10.7) 0.0 (0.0)

Ceftriaxone CRO 30 111 (100) 75 (100) 7 (100)

Cephalothin CEF 30 111 (100) 75 (100) 7 (100)

Chloramphenicol CHL 30 111 (100) 74 (98.7) 7 (100)

Ciprofloxacin CIP 5 83 (74.8) 64 (85.3) 4 (57.1)

Imipenem IPM 10 11 (10) 11 (14.7) 0.0 (0.0)

Nalidixic acid NAL 10 89 (80.1) 26 (34.7) 6 (85.7)

Streptomycin STR 10 94 (84.7) 68 (90.7) 7 (100)

Tetracycline TET 30 100 (90.1) 66 (88) 7 (100)

Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole SXT 25 106 (95.5) 70 (93.3) 7 (100)



32

Original

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Enterobacteriaceae from patients in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Wafa A. Alshehri, Tarek A. A. Moussa

J Contemp Med Sci | Vol. 7, No. 1, January-February 2021: 28 – 33

K. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to meropenem. 
Among E. cloacae strains (99.8%) were susceptible to ceftazi-
dime-avibactam. Only 0.06% Enterobacteriaceae isolates were 
non-susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam.24 A potent activity 
of ceftazidime-avibactam was shown against P. aeruginosa, 
where 97.1% isolates was susceptible, and 71.8% was inhib-
ited of non-susceptible isolates to ceftazidime, meropenem, 
and piperacillin-tazobactam.22,23 Most of the  E. coli  (87.5%) 
and K. pneumoniae (75%) isolates were MDR and showed also 
MDR phenotypes.17,21–23

The most frequent gene was blaCTX-M (195) followed 
by blaTEM (149), blaSHV (73), and blaOXA (3). The blaCTX-M was 
the most widespread gene among the E. coli strains and in 
all age categories, while the rarest gene was blaOXA (Table 5). 
Only E.  coli and K. pneumoniae were detected in teenagers. 
The presence of these genes in pairs in the same strain was 
detected, where the highest pair of genes in the same organism 
was blaTEM + blaCTX-M (134) (E. coli (74), K. pneumoniae (51) 
and E. cloaca (9)), followed by blaSHV + blaCTX-M (64) (K. pneu-
moniae (63) and E. cloaca (1)), blaSHV + blaTEM (52) (K. pneu-
moniae (51) and E. cloaca (1)) and the least pairs were blaTEM 
+ blaOXA (3) (E. cloaca (2) and P. mirabilis (1)) and blaCTX-M + 
blaOXA (2) in E. cloaca only. The blaSHV + blaCTX-M + blaTEM was 
found in 44 organisms and blaCTX-M + blaTEM + blaOXA in two 
organisms only. The blaSHV + blaOXA, blaSHV + blaCTX-M + blaOXA, 

blaSHV + blaTEM + blaOXA and blaSHV + blaCTX-M + blaTEM + blaOXA 
was not found in any organism under investigation (Table 6).

E. coli strains had 32.4%  blaCTX-M, 81% blaTEM, and 
16.2%  blaSHV genes, while in K. pneumoniae strains had 
41.1% blaCTX-M, 64.7% blaTEM, and 35.2% blaSHV genes.

24

PCR showed that blaCTX − M  gene represented by 76% fol-
lowed by  52% blaOXA,  28% blaTEM and 21% blaSHV were most 
predominant detected by CDST among ESBLs. The 78% 
of blaOXA, 65% of blaCTX − M − 1, and 57% of blaTEM genes were 
found on plasmids. Amplicon sequencing demonstrated that 
blaCTX − M − 15 (75%), blaOXA − 1 (49%) and blaTEM − 1B (34%) and 21 
isolates carried three genes in them.15,25

Conclusion
In conclusion, in teenager group, there were no organism that 
contained OXA gene, while OXA present in E. cloaca and 
P.  mirabilis only. SHV gene was absent in E. coli but present 
in E. cloaca and K. pneumoniae in this study. The most sus-
ceptible group to infection with Enterobacteriaceae was adults’ 
group, while teenage group was more resist to infection.

Conflict of Interest
None

Table 5. The frequency occurrence of ESBL encoding genes in the isolated bacteria.

Isolate 
bla

CTX-M
bla

OXA
bla

SHV
bla

TEM

Number % Number % Number % Number %

E. cloacae 9.0 4.5 2.0 66.7 1.0 0.5 11.0 5.5

E. coli 111.0 57.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.0 39.0

K. pneumoniae 74.0 38.0 0.0 0.0 72.0 36.0 59.0 29.5

P. mirabilis 0.0 0.0 1.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.5

P. aeruginosa 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 195 - 3.0 - 73 - 149 -

Table 6. The prevalence of the coexistence of ESBL encoding genes in the isolated bacteria.

Genes E. cloaca E. coli K. pneumoniae P. mirabilis P. aeruginosa Total

bla
TEM

+bla
CTX-M

9 74 51 0 0 134

bla
SHV

+bla
CTX-M

1 0 63 0 0 64

bla
SHV

+bla
TEM

1 0 51 0 0 52

bla
TEM

+bla
OXA

2 0 0 1 0 3

bla
CTX-M

+bla
OXA

2 0 0 0 0 2

bla
SHV

+bla
OXA

0 0 0 0 0 0

bla
SHV

+bla
CTX-M

+bla
TEM

1 0 43 0 0 44

bla
CTX-M

+bla
TEM

+bla
OXA

2 0 0 0 0 2

bla
SHV

+bla
CTX-M

+bla
OXA

0 0 0 0 0 0

bla
SHV

+bla
TEM

+bla
OXA

0 0 0 0 0 0

bla
SHV

+bla
CTX-M

+bla
TEM

+bla
OXA

0 0 0 0 0 0



33

Original

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Enterobacteriaceae from patients in Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaWafa A. Alshehri, Tarek A. A. Moussa

J Contemp Med Sci | Vol. 7, No. 1, January-February 2021: 28 – 33

References
1. Collignon P, Aarestrup FM, Irwin R, McEwen S. Human deaths and third-

generation cephalosporin use in poultry, Europe. 2013;
2. Chantziaras I, Boyen F, Callens B, Dewulf J. Correlation between veterinary 

antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals: a 
report on seven countries. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(3):827–34.

3. Murphy D, Ricci A, Auce Z, Beechinor JG, Bergendahl H, Breathnach R, et al. 
EMA and EFSA Joint Scientific Opinion on measures to reduce the need to 
use antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry in the European Union, and 
the resulting impacts on food safety (RONAFA). EFSA J. 2017;15(1):e04666.

4. Lazarus B, Paterson DL, Mollinger JL, Rogers BA. Do human extraintestinal 
Escherichia coli infections resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins 
originate from food-producing animals? A systematic review. Clin Infect Dis. 
2015;60(3):439–52.

5. Woerther P-L, Burdet C, Chachaty E, Andremont A. Trends in human fecal 
carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the community: toward the 
globalization of CTX-M. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(4):744–58.

6. Livermore DM, Paterson DL. Pocket guide to extended-spectrum 
β-lactamases in resistance. Current Medicine Group; 2006.

7. Pitout JDD, Nordmann P, Laupland KB, Poirel L. Emergence of 
Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) in 
the community. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56(1):52–9.

8. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: a clinical 
update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(4):657–86.

9. Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS, Edwards JE, Gilbert D, Rice LB, et al. Bad 
bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society 
of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(1):1–12.

10. Mosqueda-Gómez JL, Montaño-Loza A, Rolón AL, Cervantes C, Bobadilla-
del-Valle JM, Silva-Sánchez J, et al. Molecular epidemiology and risk factors 
of bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-
producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: a case–control study. Int J Infect Dis. 
2008;12(6):653–9.

11. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Twenty 
First informational Supplement, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 
(CLSI) document. 2011;M 100-S21.

12. Jarlier V, Nicolas M-H, Fournier G, Philippon A. Extended broad-spectrum 
β-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer β-lactam agents 
in Enterobacteriaceae: hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Clin 
Infect Dis. 1988;10(4):867–78.

13. Deak D, Outterson K, Powers JH, Kesselheim AS. Progress in the fight 
against multidrug-resistant bacteria? A review of US Food and Drug 
Administration–approved antibiotics, 2010–2015. Ann Intern Med. 
2016;165(5):363–72.

14. Mehrad B, Clark NM, Zhanel GG, Lynch III JP. Antimicrobial resistance 
in hospital-acquired gram-negative bacterial infections. Chest. 
2015;147(5):1413–21.

15. Abrar S, Ain NU, Liaqat H, Hussain S, Rasheed F, Riaz S. Distribution of bla 
(CTX - M) , bla (TEM), bla (SHV) and bla (OXA) genes in extended-spectrum-
β-lactamase-producing clinical isolates: A three-year multi-center study 
from Lahore, Pakistan. Antimicrobial resistance and infection control 
[Internet]. 2019 May 22;8:80. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/31139363

16. Garrity G. Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology: Volume 2: The 
Proteobacteria, Part B: The Gammaproteobacteria. Vol. 2. Springer Science & 
Business Media; 2007.

17. Ahmed SF, Ali MMM, Mohamed ZK, Moussa TA, Klena JD. Fecal carriage of 
extended-spectrum β-lactamases and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in a 
Libyan community. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13(1).

18. Castanheira M, Mendes RE, Jones RN, Sader HS. Changes in the frequencies 
of β-lactamase genes among Enterobacteriaceae isolates in US hospitals, 
2012 to 2014: activity of ceftazidime-avibactam tested against β-lactamase-
producing isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemotherapy. 2016;60(8):4770–7.

19. Jacob JT, Klein E, Laxminarayan R, Beldavs Z, Lynfield R, Kallen AJ, et al. Vital 
signs: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. MMWR Morb Mortal Week 
Rep. 2013;62(9):165.

20. Gupta N, Limbago BM, Patel JB, Kallen AJ. Carbapenem-resistant 
Enterobacteriaceae: epidemiology and prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 
2011;53(1):60–7.

21. Ali MMM, Ahmed SF, Klena JD, Mohamed ZK, Moussa TAA, Ghenghesh KS. 
Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in diarrheic children in Egypt: Molecular 
characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility. J Infect Develop Count. 
2014;8(5):589–96.

22. Sader HS, Castanheira M, Shortridge D, Mendes RE, Flamm RK. Antimicrobial 
activity of ceftazidime-avibactam tested against multidrug-resistant 
Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from US medical 
centers, 2013 to 2016. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(11).

23. Sader HS, Castanheira M, Shortridge D, Mendes RE, Flamm RK. Antimicrobial 
activity of ceftazidime-avibactam tested against multidrug-resistant 
Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from U.S. Medical 
Centers, 2013 to 2016. Antimicrob Agents Chemother [Internet]. 2017 
Oct 24;61(11):e01045-17. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/28827415

24. Pishtiwan AH, Khadija KM. Prevalence of blaTEM, blaSHV, and blaCTX-M 
genes among ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli 
isolated from thalassemia patients in Erbil, Iraq. Mediterr J Hematol Infect 
Dis. 2019;11(1).

25. Ali MMM, Mohamed ZK, Klena JD, Ahmed SF, Moussa TAA, Ghenghesh KS. 
Molecular characterization of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli from Libya. Am J 
Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(5):866–71.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative 
works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. 

https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v7i1.920