Journal of Current Biomedical Reports  jcbior.com 

Volume 2, Number 3, 2021                                                                                                          eISSN: 2717-1906 

1 

Original research 

Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes among 
Escherichia coli isolates from urinary tract infection in Mashhad 

 

Maryam Hafiz1, Gholamreza Hashemi Tabar1,*, Mehrnaz Rad1 

 
1Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran 

 

Abstract 

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are known as one of the most important infections around the world, 
and Escherichia coli is the most important cause of UTI. Also, the empiric treatment and misusing of 
antimicrobial agents has led to increasing multi-drug resistance around the world which is a worldwide 
concern. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBLs) is an enzyme group that is produced by the 
Enterobacteriaceae family. The three main ESBLs enzyme are as follow: blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaSHV, 
additionally, there are several types of each of them by the same mechanism. This study was conducted 
to evaluate the prevalence of ESBL genes among E. coli isolated from UTI patients. A total of 105 isolates 
were collected from UTI patients at two hospitals in Mashhad from 2017 to 2019. Bacterial 
identification was performed by standard microbiologic methods. The assessment of antimicrobial 
susceptibility was accomplished by the disk diffusion method. The presence of ESBL genes was 
investigated by multiplex-PCR. The prevalence of UTI, among females, was identified more than males. 
Furthermore, the blaTEM and blaCTX-M genes were detected in all isolates, but only six isolates (5.7%) 
were harboring blaSHV. The considerable role of E. coli in UTI infection, as well as the presence of ESBL 
genes in E. coli strains, emphasize the need for surveillance of antimicrobial therapy to prevent the 
extension of resistance among clinical strains. 

Keywords: Escherichia coli, ESBL, Urinary tract infection, Multiplex-PCR 
 

1. Introduction 
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) happen through 

community-acquired or nosocomial-acquired, which 
are one of the most prevalent types of human infection 
[1, 2]. Escherichia coli is known as the most important 
pathogen in UTIs, among both outpatient and 
inpatient [3, 4]. On the other hand, the empiric of 
treatment and misusing of antimicrobial agents such 
as, beta-lactams, beta-lactamase inhibitor, 
fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems, has led to 
increasing multi-drug resistance around the world 
which is a worldwide concern [5, 6]. Extended-
spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBLs) is an enzyme group 

                                                           
*Corresponding author:  
Gholamreza Hashemi Tabar, Ph.D 
Azadi Square, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran,  
P.O. Box: 9177948974 
Tel/Fax: +98 51 38836056 
Email: hashemit@um.ac.ir 
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9760-1096 
 
Received: June, 14, 2021 
Accepted: July, 12, 2021 

that is produced by the Enterobacteriaceae family, 
which are mostly isolated from inpatient cases [7]. The 
ESBL positive bacteria are able to inactivate several 
antimicrobial agents including an oxyimino-group 
such as cephalosporins (e.g. ceftazidime, and 
ceftriaxone), monobactam (e.g. aztreonam), but not 
able to inactivate cephamycin, and carbapenems [7, 
8]. The three main ESBL enzymes are blaCTX-M, blaTEM, 
and blaSHV [9, 10]. These enzymes are encoded 
generally by genes located on plasmids. Actually, the 
mutation in these genes (particularly blaTEM and 
blaSHV) led to the change in the form of the enzyme 
near its active site to increment the affinity and 

  © The Author(s) 2021 

https://jcbior.com/


Hafiz et al. 

2 

hydrolytic capability of beta-lactamase for oxyimino 
compounds [11]. Also, some of them are encoding on 
transposons which could transmit between organisms 
[8]. The growing up of ESBL producing strains brings 
up some problems including the transmission of 
resistance to other organisms, refusing treatment, and 
increase in mortality rate. So, more surveillance is 
needed to identify the rate of the problem and help to 
select appropriate antimicrobial agents to treat the 
infection. This study was conducted to evaluate the 
prevalence of blaTEM, blaCTX-M, and blaSHV genes by 
multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) among 
E. coli isolated from UTI patients.  

2. Materials and Methods 
2.1 Sample’s collection 
A total of 105 E. coli isolates were collected from 

UTI patients at Ghaem and Emamreza hospitals in 
Mashhad from 2017 to 2019. Also, the basic 
information of patients was gathered, including age 
and gender, UTI history, hospital visit reports, and 
reports of taken antimicrobial agents from patients. 
Isolates cultured on selective-differential media, 
MacConkey agar (MAC), and Eosin Methylene Blue 
agar (EMB), were incubated overnight at 37°C. Then, 
microscopically examination was done by Gram 
staining from lactose-positive colonies. Likewise, 
biochemical profiling, such as Oxidase/Catalase 
activity, Motility, Indole, Urease, Triple Sugar Iron 

agar (TSI), and Methyl Red-Voges Proskauer test 
(MR-VP) has been studied. 

 
2.2 Antimicrobial susceptibility test 
The assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility was 

accomplished by the disk diffusion method 
recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory 
Standards Institute (CLSI, 2020) (13)[12],  against 15 
antibiotic disks (Padtanteb, Iran) as follow:  
ceftazidime (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), amikacin (30 
μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), 
ciprofloxacin (5 μg), cefixime (5 μg), cefazoline (30 μg), 
ceftriaxone (30 μg), meropenem (10 μg), gentamicin 

(10 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), cefepime (30 μg), 
cefotaxime (30 μg) and co-trimoxazole (1.25/23.75 
μg). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a positive control 
for antimicrobial susceptibility tests. 

 
2.3 PCR amplification 
DNA extraction was done by the boiling method 

as described earlier by Nazari et al. [13]. The prepared 
DNA samples were assessed for prevalence of blaTEM, 
blaSHV, and blaCTX-M genes by M-PCR by using the MJ 
mini thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) 
[14]. The PCR reaction was conducted in 25 volumes 
including 12.5 μl of PCR 2X MasterMix (Parstous 
company, Iran) containing Taq DNA Polymerase, 
reaction buffer, dNTPs mixture, a protein stabilizer, 
and the convenience for use was optimized by adding 

Table 1. The information of oligonucleotides used as primer in multiplex-PCR 

 

Primer name Primer sequence (5’-3’) Amplicon size (bp) Reference 

blaTEM164.SE TCG CCG CAT ACA CTA TTC TCA GAA TGA 
445 

14 

blaTEM164.AS ACG CTC ACC GGC TCC AGA TTT AT 

blaSHV.SE ATG CGT TAT ATT CGC CTG TG 
724 

blaSHV.AS TGC TTT GTT ATT CGG GCC AA 

blaCTX-M. U1 ATG TGC AGC ACC AGT AAA GTG ATG GC 
593 

blaCTX-M. U2 TGG GTA AAG TAA GTG ACC AGA ATC AGC GG 

 

Table 2. The frequency of UTI in different age groups  

 

Age groups <10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 >60 

Female 8 3 9 5 5 10 16 

Male 5 0 2 3 6 5 28 

Total a 13 3 11 8 11 15 44 
 

a Results presented as number of cases 
 



Hafiz et al. 

3 

sediment for electrophoresis and 2x solution of 
loading dye, 1 μl of each primer (10 pM), 2 μl of DNA 
template (100 ng/reaction) and 4.5 μl of Nuclease-free 
water. PCR conditions were as follow: initial 
denaturation at 95°C for 15 seconds; followed by 35 
cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, 
annealing at 61°C for 40 seconds, and extension at 
72°C for 2 minutes with a final extension at 72°C for 10 
minutes [15]. Electrophoresis of amplicons was 
performed using 1.5% agarose gels. The primers' 
information is listed in Table 1. Also, E. coli ATCC 
35218 and distilled water were used as the positive and 
negative control, respectively. 

 
3. Results  
3.1 Prevalence of UTI in different ages and 

genders 
Based on the results, it was determined that the 

prevalence of UTI among females with 56 (53.3%) 
cases was more than males with 49 (46.7%) cases. 
Most isolates were recovered from patients with >60 
ages, and the lowest rate was observed in 11-20 age 
groups. The information of patients’ age groups was 
listed in Table 2. 

 
3.2 Antimicrobial susceptibility test 
According to the results, amikacin (98%), 

meropenem (93%), nitrofurantoin (89%), and 
imipenem (88%) revealed the highest activity against 
isolates, respectively. All results are listed in Table 3. 

 
3.3 PCR results 
The analysis of PCR products on gel 

electrophoresis revealed that the most prevalent 
ESBLs among studied isolates were blaTEM, and blaCTX-
M genes (100%). While only six (5.71%) isolates were 
carried the blaSHV gene. 

 
4. Discussion  
UTI is known as one of the most highlighted 

healthcare infections. Our finding notes that women 
have a higher rate of UTI than men. This fact confirms 
earlier findings of the stress UTI in females [16-19]. 
Also, the most prevalent was observed in the >60 age 
group, which was similar to previous surveys [20, 21]. 
However, this result was in contrast with other 
observations, which reported the highest prevalence in 
2-10 and 20-29 age groups, respectively [17, 22]. Our 
results revealed the highest resistance rate for 

    

T
a
b

le
 3

. 
T

h
e
 r

e
su

lt
s 

o
f 

a
n
ti

m
ic

ro
b

ia
l 

su
sc

e
p

ti
b

il
it

y
 t

e
st

 (
T

o
ta

l 
n
 =

 1
0

5
) 

 

P
h

e
n

o
ty

p
e
 

C
A

Z
 

IM
P

 
A

M
K

 
N

A
L

 
A

M
P

 
C

IP
 

C
F

M
 

M
E

M
 

C
F

Z
 

C
R

O
 

G
E

N
 

N
IT

 
F

E
P

 
C

T
X

 
S

X
T

 

S
u

sc
e
p

ti
b

le
 

5
4
 

(5
1

.4
) 

9
3
 

(8
8

.5
) 

1
0

3
 

(9
8

.1
) 

6
7
 

(6
3

.8
) 

1
8
 

(1
7

.1
) 

5
0
 

(4
7

.6
) 

5
5
 

(5
2

.4
) 

9
8
 

(9
3

.3
) 

4
4
 

(4
1

.9
) 

4
5
 

(4
2

.8
) 

8
7
 

(8
2

.8
) 

9
4
 

(8
9

.5
) 

5
8
 

(5
5

.2
) 

4
1
 

(3
9

.1
) 

3
1
 

(2
9

.5
) 

In
te

r
m

e
d

ia
te

-

r
e
si

st
a

n
t 

0
 

0
 

0
 

4
 

(3
.8

) 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
0

 
5

 

(4
.7

) 
0

 
0

 

R
e
si

st
a

n
t 

5
1
 

(4
8

.6
) 

1
2
 

(1
1

.5
) 

2
 

(1
.9

) 

3
4
 

(3
2

.4
) 

8
7
 

(8
2

.9
) 

5
5
 

(5
2

.4
) 

5
0
 

(4
7

.6
) 

7
 

(6
.7

) 

6
1
 

(5
8

.1
) 

6
0
 

(5
7

.2
) 

1
8
 

(1
7

.2
) 

1
1
 

(1
0

.5
) 

4
7
 

(4
4

.1
) 

6
4
 

(6
0

.9
) 

7
4
 

(7
0

.5
) 

 

A
b

b
re

v
ia

ti
o

n
: 

C
A

Z
, 

c
e
ft

a
z
id

im
e
; 

IM
P

, 
im

ip
e
n
e
m

; 
A

M
K

, 
a
m

ik
a
c
in

; 
C

IP
, 

c
ip

ro
fl

o
x
a
c
in

; 
C

F
M

, 
c
e
fi

x
im

e
; 

M
E

M
, 

m
e
ro

p
e
n
e
m

; 
C

F
Z

, 
c
e
fa

z
o

li
n
e
; 

C
R

O
, 

c
e
ft

ri
a
x
o

n
e
; 

G
E

N
, 

g
e
n
ta

m
y
c
in

; 
N

IT
, 

n
it

ro
fu

ra
n
to

in
; 

F
E

P
, 

c
e
fe

p
im

e
; 

C
T

X
, 

c
e
fo

ta
x
im

e
; 

S
X

T
, 

tr
im

e
th

o
p

ri
m

/s
u
lf

a
m

e
th

o
x
a
z
o

le
 

 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjJhcq7-orWAhUlAsAKHUBDBpAQFggyMAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpost%2FNuclease_free_water_vs_Ultra_pure_water_DNase_RNase_free&usg=AFQjCNE5YJnnDf3z5jKvfq_D39LqgeCOuA
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjJhcq7-orWAhUlAsAKHUBDBpAQFggyMAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpost%2FNuclease_free_water_vs_Ultra_pure_water_DNase_RNase_free&usg=AFQjCNE5YJnnDf3z5jKvfq_D39LqgeCOuA


Hafiz et al. 

4 

ampicillin (82.8%) and cotrimoxazole (70.4%) which 
was consistent whit previous surveys [17, 23-25]. 
However, another study was recorded a lower 
resistance rate for ampicillin and cotrimoxazole, 67% 
and 45%, respectively [26]. On the other hand, the 
highest susceptibility was observed against amikacin, 
meropenem, nitrofurantoin, and imipenem. While the 
lower susceptibility for amikacin (61%) and 
nitrofurantoin (72%) has been reported in an earlier 
survey [27]. However, our finding for nitrofurantoin 
susceptibility was close to other studies [17, 28]. Also, 
the susceptibility rate of isolates to imipenem and 
amikacin in the current study was in line with previous 
surveys [17, 23, 29]. 

According to earlier reports, the high rate of ESBL-
E. coli was noted from UTI among both inpatient and 
outpatient, whereas it was more significant among 
inpatient [24, 30]. 

Generally, the highest presence of ESBLs was 
recorded for blaTEM and blaCTX-M, which was in line 
with earlier results [9, 31-34]. Although, some studies 
reported a lower rate of blaCTX-M, 28%, and 32%, 
respectively [35, 36]. This discrepancy can be 
explained by different geography and the increase of 
genes transferring during the time. On the other hand, 
blaSHV was detected in only six isolates. Our 
experiment about the prevalence of the blaSHV gene 
was close to previous survey [33]. According to these 
results, the blaSHV gene is not predominant as the two 
other genes. However, new studies revealed a high 
frequency of blaSHV that might increase in the future 
[11, 37]. Certainly, further tests such as confirmatory 
ESBL test and statistical analysis are required to 
determine the relationship between these genes and 
resistant phenotype.  

The considerable role of E. coli in UTI infection, as 
well as the presence of ESBL genes in E. coli strains, 
emphasize the need for surveillance of antimicrobial 
therapy to prevent the extension of resistance among 
clinical strains. 

 
Acknowledgments 
The authors would like to thank all Ghaem and 

Imam Reza hospitals staff, which collaborating in 
collecting isolates.  

 
Author contributions  
All authors contributed equally to each part of the 

manuscript and approved the final version. 

 
Conflict of interests 
The authors claim that there is no conflict of 

interest. 
 
Ethical declarations 
This study was in accordance with the declaration 

of Helsinki and ethical permission was sought from 
the institutional Ethics Committee of Ferdowsi 
University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. However, 
because we only used leftovers from clinical 
specimens, the local ethics committee waived the need 
for informed consent. 

 
Financial Support 
This study was funded by Ferdowsi University of 

Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran (Grant number 109). 
 
References 

1. Sedighimehr N, Dehghan Manshadi F. Electrical Stimulation for 
Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in People with Multiple 
Sclerosis: A Systematic Review. J Clin Physiother Res. 2018; 
3(2):48-53. 
2. Haghighatpanah M, Mojtahedi A. Characterization of antibiotic 
resistance and virulence factors of Escherichia coli strains isolated 
from Iranian inpatients with urinary tract infections. Infect Drug 
Resist. 2019; 12:2747-54. 
3. Larramendy S, Gaultier A, Fournier JP, Caillon J, Moret L, 
Beaudeau F. Local characteristics associated with higher 
prevalence of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in community-
acquired urinary tract infections: an observational, cross-sectional 
study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021; 76(3):789-95. 
4. Fathi J, Ebrahimi F, Nazarian S, Hajizade A, Malekzadegan Y, 
Abdi A. Production of egg yolk antibody (IgY) against shiga-like 
toxin (stx) and evaluation of its prophylaxis potency in mice. 
Microb Pathog. 2020; 145:104199. 
5. Uzodi AS, Lohse CM, Banerjee R. Risk Factors For and 
Outcomes of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Infections in 
Children. Infect Dis Ther. 2017; 6(2):245-57. 
6. Rawat D, Nair D. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Gram 
Negative Bacteria. J Glob Infect Dis. 2010; 2(3):263-74. 
7. Abayneh M, Tesfaw G, Abdissa A. Isolation of Extended-
Spectrum β-lactamase- (ESBL-) Producing Escherichia coli and 
Klebsiella pneumoniae from Patients with Community-Onset 
Urinary Tract Infections in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, 
Southwest Ethiopia. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2018; 
2018:4846159. 
8. Shah AA, Ali Y, Maqbool A, Abbasi SA. Phenotypic detection of 
extended-spectrum beta-lactamase in multidrug-resistant 
acinetobacter baumannii isolated in Fauji Foundation Hospital 
Rawalpindi. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021; 71(4):1144-7. 
9. Manyahi J, Moyo SJ, Tellevik MG, Ndugulile F, Urassa W, 
Blomberg B, et al. Detection of CTX-M-15 beta-lactamases in 
Enterobacteriaceae causing hospital- and community-acquired 

https://doi.org/10.22037/jcpr.v3i2.20385
https://doi.org/10.22037/jcpr.v3i2.20385
https://doi.org/10.22037/jcpr.v3i2.20385
https://doi.org/10.22037/jcpr.v3i2.20385
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31564925/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31564925/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31564925/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31564925/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33351903/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33351903/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33351903/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33351903/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33351903/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32320733/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32320733/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32320733/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32320733/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28374267/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28374267/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28374267/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20927289/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20927289/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30651898/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30651898/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30651898/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30651898/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30651898/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30651898/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34125759/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34125759/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34125759/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34125759/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28415986/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28415986/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28415986/


Hafiz et al. 

5 

urinary tract infections as early as 2004, in Dar es Salaam, 
Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2017; 17(1):282. 
10. Hashemi B, Afkhami H, Khaledi M, Kiani M, Bialvaei AZ, Fathi 
J, et al. Frequency of Metalo beta Lactamase genes, bla IMP1, INT 
1 in Acinetobacter baumanii isolated from burn patients North of 
Iran. Gene Rep. 2020; 21:100800. 
11. Pishtiwan AH, Khadija KM. Prevalence of blaTEM, blaSHV, 
and blaCTX-M Genes among ESBL-Producing Klebsiella 
pneumoniae and Escherichia coli Isolated from Thalassemia 
Patients in Erbil, Iraq. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2019; 
11(1):e2019041. 
12. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility 
Testing. 30th ed. CLSI Supplement M100. Wayne, PA: Clinical and 
Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020. 
13. Nazari M, Youzbashi Z, Khaledi M, Fathi J, Afkhami H. 
Detection of carbapenem resistance and virulence genes among 
Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from hospital environments in 
center of Iran. J Curr Biomed Rep. 2021; 2(1):14. 
14. van Driel AA, Notermans DW, Meima A, Mulder M, Donker 
GA, Stobberingh EE, et al. Antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli 
isolated from uncomplicated UTI in general practice patients over 
a 10-year period. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019; 38(11):2151-
8. 
15. Miraalami G, Parviz M, Khalajzadeh S. Evaluation of Antibiotic 
Resistance in Extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase (ESBL) Genes 
in the E. coli Isolates of Urinary Infections. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 
2015; 17(8):19-26. 
16. Haq I, Lal A, Ullah A, Ahmad A, Akram A, Siraj S. Frequency of 
urinary tract infection in children and their sensitivity pattern in 
swat. J Saidu Med Coll. 2017; 7(1):8-11. 
17. Ramírez-Castillo FY, Moreno-Flores AC, Avelar-González FJ, 
Márquez-Díaz F, Harel J, Guerrero-Barrera AL. An evaluation of 
multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolates in urinary tract 
infections from Aguascalientes, Mexico: cross-sectional study. Ann 
Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2018; 17(1):34. 
18. Hossain A, Hossain SA, Fatema AN, Wahab A, Alam MM, 
Islam MN, et al. Age and gender-specific antibiotic resistance 
patterns among Bangladeshi patients with urinary tract infection 
caused by Escherichia coli. Heliyon. 2020; 6(6):e04161. 
19. Fatima T, Rafiq S, Iqbal A, Husnain S. Prevalence and 
Antibiogram of MDR E. coli Strains Isolated from UTI Patients—
1-Year Retrospective Study at Nishtar Medical Hospital, Multan. 
SN Compr Clin Med. 2020; 2(4):423-31. 
20. Lob SH, Nicolle LE, Hoban DJ, Kazmierczak KM, Badal RE, 
Sahm DF. Susceptibility patterns and ESBL rates of Escherichia 
coli from urinary tract infections in Canada and the United States, 
SMART 2010-2014. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016; 85(4):459-
65. 
21. Zubair KU, Shah AH, Fawwad A, Sabir R, Butt A. Frequency of 
urinary tract infection and antibiotic sensitivity of uropathogens in 
patients with diabetes. Pak J Med Sci. 2019; 35(6):1664-8. 
22. Kulkarni SR, Peerapur BV, Sailesh KS. Isolation and Antibiotic 
Susceptibility Pattern of Escherichia coli from Urinary Tract 
Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital of North Eastern Karnataka. 
J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2017; 8(2):176-80. 
23. Parajuli NP, Maharjan P, Parajuli H, Joshi G, Paudel D, Sayami 
S, et al. High rates of multidrug resistance among uropathogenic 
Escherichia coli in children and analyses of ESBL producers from 
Nepal. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017; 6:9. 

24. Zorgani A, Almagatef A, Sufya N, Bashein A, Tubbal A. 
Detection of CTX-M-15 Among Uropathogenic Escherichia coli 
Isolated from Five Major Hospitals in Tripoli, Libya. Oman Med J. 
2017; 32(4):322-7. 
25. Alqasim A, Abu Jaffal A, Alyousef AA. Prevalence of Multidrug 
Resistance and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Carriage of 
Clinical Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolates in Riyadh, Saudi 
Arabia. Int J Microbiol. 2018; 2018:3026851. 
26. Yılmaz E, Aslantaş Ö. Phylogenetic Group/Subgroups 
Distributions, Virulence Factors, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility 
of Escherichia coli Strains from Urinary Tract Infections in Hatay. 
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020; 53:e20190429. 
27. Patel HB, Soni ST, Bhagyalaxmi A, Patel NM. Causative agents 
of urinary tract infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility 
patterns at a referral center in Western India: An audit to help 
clinicians prevent antibiotic misuse. J Family Med Prim Care. 
2019; 8(1):154-9. 
28. Zilberberg MD, Nathanson BH, Sulham K, Shorr AF. 
Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Cross-Resistance Patterns among 
Common Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in U.S. Hospitals, 
2013 to 2018. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020; 64(8). 
29. Fatima S, Muhammad IN, Usman S, Jamil S, Khan MN, Khan 
SI. Incidence of multidrug resistance and extended-spectrum beta-
lactamase expression in community-acquired urinary tract 
infection among different age groups of patients. Indian J 
Pharmacol. 2018; 50(2):69-74. 
30. Al-Jamei SA, Albsoul AY, Bakri FG, Al-Bakri AG. Extended-
spectrum β-lactamase producing E. coli in urinary tract infections: 
A two-center, cross-sectional study of prevalence, genotypes and 
risk factors in Amman, Jordan. J Infect Public Health. 2019; 
12(1):21-5. 
31. Abe Y, Inan-Erdogan I, Fukuchi K, Wakabayashi H, Ogawa Y, 
Hibino S, et al. Efficacy of non-carbapenem antibiotics for pediatric 
patients with first febrile urinary tract infection due to extended-
spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. J Infect 
Chemother. 2017; 23(8):517-22. 
32. Jena J, Sahoo RK, Debata NK, Subudhi E. Prevalence of TEM, 
SHV, and CTX-M genes of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-
producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from urinary tract 
infections in adults. 3 Biotech. 2017; 7(4):244. 
33. Pandit R, Awal B, Shrestha SS, Joshi G, Rijal BP, Parajuli NP. 
Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) Genotypes among 
Multidrug-Resistant Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Clinical 
Isolates from a Teaching Hospital of Nepal. Interdiscip Perspect 
Infect Dis. 2020; 2020:6525826. 
34. Rajivgandhi G, Maruthupandy M, Manoharan N. Detection of 
TEM and CTX-M genes from ciprofloxacin resistant Proteus 
mirabilis and Escherichia coli isolated on urinary tract infections 
(UTIs). Microb Pathog. 2018; 121:123-30. 
35. Alipour M, Jafari A. Evaluation of the Prevalence of blaSHV, 
blaTEM, and blaCTX Genes in Escherichia coli Isolated From 
Urinary Tract Infections. Avicenna J Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019; 
6(3):83-7. 
36. Bajpai T, Pandey M, Varma M, Bhatambare GS. Prevalence of 
TEM, SHV, and CTX-M Beta-Lactamase genes in the urinary 
isolates of a tertiary care hospital. Avicenna J Med. 2017; 7(1):12-6. 
37. Ahrabi S, Derakhshanpour Khamene J. Checking the 
Plentitude of (BLA-SHV) ß-lactamase Gene in Separated E. Colis 
in Children under 6 Years-Old Infected with Urinary Tract 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28415986/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28415986/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2020.100800
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2020.100800
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2020.100800
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2020.100800
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31308917/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31308917/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31308917/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31308917/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31308917/
https://doi.org/10.52547/JCBioR.2.1.14
https://doi.org/10.52547/JCBioR.2.1.14
https://doi.org/10.52547/JCBioR.2.1.14
https://doi.org/10.52547/JCBioR.2.1.14
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31440915/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31440915/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31440915/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31440915/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31440915/
http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/jbums.17.8.19
http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/jbums.17.8.19
http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/jbums.17.8.19
http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/jbums.17.8.19
https://jsmc.pk/index.php/jsmc/article/view/54/34
https://jsmc.pk/index.php/jsmc/article/view/54/34
https://jsmc.pk/index.php/jsmc/article/view/54/34
https://jsmc.pk/index.php/jsmc/article/view/54/34
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30041652/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30041652/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30041652/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30041652/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30041652/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32548331/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32548331/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32548331/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32548331/
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00246-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00246-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00246-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00246-8
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27306116/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27306116/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27306116/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27306116/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27306116/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31777512/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31777512/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31777512/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28781483/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28781483/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28781483/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28781483/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28096977/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28096977/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28096977/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28096977/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28804585/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28804585/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28804585/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28804585/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30305814/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30305814/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30305814/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30305814/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32049204/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32049204/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32049204/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32049204/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30911498/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30911498/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30911498/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30911498/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30911498/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32423953/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32423953/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32423953/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32423953/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30100654/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30100654/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30100654/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30100654/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30100654/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30145152/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30145152/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30145152/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30145152/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30145152/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28528936/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28528936/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28528936/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28528936/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28528936/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28710743/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28710743/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28710743/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28710743/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32377184/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32377184/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32377184/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32377184/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32377184/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29778819/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29778819/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29778819/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29778819/
https://doi.org/10.34172/ajcmi.2019.15
https://doi.org/10.34172/ajcmi.2019.15
https://doi.org/10.34172/ajcmi.2019.15
https://doi.org/10.34172/ajcmi.2019.15
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28182026/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28182026/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28182026/
https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/5164/2459
https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/5164/2459
https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/5164/2459


Hafiz et al. 

6 

Infection Referring to Tehran Central Pathobiology Laboratory 
(2014). Eur Online J Nat Soc Sci. 2017; 6(3):351-67. 

 
 
 

https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/5164/2459
https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/5164/2459