Corrosion and wear protection of AISI 4140 carbon steel using a laser-modified high-velocity oxygen fuel thermal sprayed coatings http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 877 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888; http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 Open Access : : ISSN 1847-9286 www.jESE-online.org Original scientific paper Microstructural and mechanical properties of CNT-reinforced ZrO2-Y2O3 coated boiler tube steel T-91 Sandeep Kumar1,, Rakesh Bhatia2, Hazoor Singh2 and Roshan Lal Virdi3 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Guru Kashi University, Bathinda, Punjab, India 2Yadavindra Department of Engineering, Punjabi University Guru Kashi Campus, Damdama Sahib, India 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Punjabi University, Patiala, India Full Affiliation, Address Corresponding author: sandeep_ycoe@yahoo.com; Tel.:+91-9041021227 Received: January 1, 2022; Accepted: May 24, 2022; Published: July 26, 2022 Abstract The main purpose of this study was to fabricate carbon nanotubes (CNTs) reinforced zirconnium yttrium coatings on boiler tube steel and to investigate the microstructural and mechanical properties of these coatings. Plasma sprayed conventional ZrO2-Y2O3, ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT and ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT were prepared and deposited successfully on boiler tube steel material T-91 (ASTM SA-213) by plasma thermal spray technology. Microhardness, porosity, XRD (X-ray diffraction), SEM/EDAX (scanning elec- tron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy), X-ray mapping and cross- sectional analyses were used to analyse the specimens. The hardness of CNT reinforced ZrO2-Y2O3 increased with the increase in the percentage of CNT, whereas the porosity of the composite coatings decreased with the increase in the CNT percentage. The observed increase in hardness may be attributed to the content of CNT in the composite coating. The present research gives important information related to the fabrication and physical characteristics of CNT-reinforced ZrO2-Y2O3 coatings deposited on T-91 boiler tube steel. Keywords Carbon nanotubes, plasma spray, porosity, hardness Introduction In recent years, the importance of stainless steel alloys has attracted considerable attention because of their usage in a wide range of industrial applications to withstand high temperatures and a critical environment. Stainless steel is used to perform in harsh environments, and this seems to be possible due to its excellent mechanical and thermal properties [1]. Serious and never-ending hot corrosion problem occurs in boiler tubes, I.C. engines, power generation equipment, aircraft and gas turbines [2]. In these installations, corrosive salts are formed by low-quality fuels used, which contain Na and V as impurities that can form Na2SO4 and V2O5 corrosive elements [3]. To http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 http://www.jese-online.org/ mailto:sandeep_ycoe@yahoo.com J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888 CNT-REINFORCED ZrO2-Y2O3 COATED STEEL T-91 878 enhance the corrosion resistance of the conventional steels used in thermal power plants, the researchers have applied many types of coatings on these steels. Thermal spraying methods are one of the important methods of applying coatings on steel to increase its life span [4]. Along with alloys, some reinforced coatings are employed to increase the resistance of the component against high-temperature oxidation [5]. In the recent past, there have been advancements in powder production technologies along with advancements in spraying methods, which have resulted in developing coatings with high corrosion resistance properties [6]. The spraying techniques do not limit the material selection in respect of coatings and substrate composition [7]. These techniques can apply coatings of a few millimeter thicknesses on the steel surface with high hardness. The flame spray, arc spray, plasma and HVOF techniques are used to apply coatings on the boiler components [8,9]. Defect-free plasma coatings are not possible because thermal spray coatings consist of pores and voids. These pores and voids originate at the splat boundaries during the spraying process. Therefore, through these pores and voids, the corrosive elements penetrate towards the substrate material in the corrosive environment [10,11]. The carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were developed and invented by Iijima [12]. The carbon nanotubes have high strength and excellent thermal properties [13–16]. Carbon nanotubes have more than five times elastic constant and more than 100 times tensile strength than conventional steels [17,18]. Due to these properties, CNTs are used as prospective reinforcement for fabricating composite materials [19]. A few researchers have used CNT-metal composite coatings to enhance the corrosion resistance of Ni- and Zn-based composite coatings [20]. CNT reinforced coatings act as an inert physical barrier to initiating and developing corrosion mechanisms. It is revealed in the literature that very few research has been conducted on the corrosion behavior of CNT reinforced coatings. Some researchers have developed different CNTs-Al2O3 composite coatings to study their tribological behavior [21-25], but no studies on CNT - zirconium yttrium (ZrO2-Y2O3) composite coatings for high-temperature corrosion are available. In the present research work, plasma sprayed conventional ZrO2-Y2O3, ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT and ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT coatings were deposited successfully, as coatings, on T-91 boiler tube steel material to protect in the high-temperature applications. Experimental Substrate material The fresh T-91 boiler tubes were procured from Talwandi Sabo Thermal Power Plant situated at Banawali, Bathinda, Punjab, India. The chemical composition of the base material analyzed using spectroscopy is shown in Table 1. The specimens of 22×15×3 mm were cut from boiler tubes. The standard metallurgical procedures were followed to prepare the samples. Due care was taken to avoid structural and metallurgical changes in the samples. The specimens were then polished using silicon carbide paper. Before deposition of different coatings, the specimens were shot blasted using grit 45 alumina powder. Table 1. Chemical composition of T-91 Composition Content, wt.% C Si Mn P S Cr Mo Ni V Fe Nominal 0.07~0.14 0.20~0.50 0.30~0.60 ≤0.02 ≤0.02 8-9.5 0.85-1.05 0.4 ≤0.4 Bal. Actual 0.12 0.42 0.42 0.016 0.004 8.354 0.93 0.2 0.05 Bal. S. Kumar et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 879 Coating powders Compositions of coating powders were prepared by blending conventional zirconium yttrium, ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT, and ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT in a laboratory ball mill, using a low-energy ball milling method. Mixing of coating powders was done in a ball mill for 4 hours at 200 rpm [26]. Powder particles were asymmetric in shape and size 45 ± 10 µm. The SEM images of coating powders after mixing in a ball mill are shown in Figures 1 (a)-(c). Figure 1. SEM micrographs of powders of (a) conventional ZrO2-Y2O3; (b) ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT and (c) ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT Formulation of coating The different CNT mixed ZrO2-Y2O3 coatings were deposited on T-91 boiler steel substrates with a plasma spray process at Metallizing Equipment Company Pvt. Limited, Jodhpur, India. The process parameters selected for the plasma spray technique are shown in Table 2. The process parameters were constant during the deposition of coatings. Coatings of around 250-270 µm thickness were deposited by the plasma spray process. The macrographs of as-coated samples are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. Macrographs of (a) conventional ZrO2-Y2O3; (b) ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT; and (c) ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT-coated steel specimen Table 2. Plasma spraying process parameters Voltage, V Current, A Primary gas (Argon) flow, L min-1 Powder feed rate, g min-1 Spray distance, cm 70 575 39 30 10.16 Coating examinations The coated specimens were sectioned by a slow-speed diamond cutter at a controlled rate and then hot mounted in epoxy for cross-sectional examination. The mounted specimens were then polished by a standard polishing procedure for XRD, SEM/EDAX and cross-sectional elemental analysis. The microhardness of coated samples was measured from the coating substrate interface [27,28]. The thickness of ZrO2-Y2O3 CNT coated steel specimens was measured with the help of minitest 2000 thin film thickness gauge (Make: Elektro Physik Koln Company, Germany, precision ±1 µm). The image analysis method was adopted to measure the porosity of all the coated http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888 CNT-REINFORCED ZrO2-Y2O3 COATED STEEL T-91 880 specimens. A PMP3 inverted metallurgical microscope installed with LEICA image analyser software was used to measure the porosity of air plasma sprayed CNT-reinforced zirconium yttrium coatings on T-91 steel specimens. The porosity was evaluated of as-coated samples after polishing by a computer-based analyzing system. Results Coating thickness measurement The thickness of the coating was examined along the cross-section of the specimens. The thickness was found to be in the range of 225-250 µm and is reported in Table 4. The coating thickness was found to be in parity with research work reported in the literature [16,29,30]. Porosity analysis The thermal spray coatings are generally porous in nature due to splats and voids during deposition. The porosity strongly influences the properties of coatings [26,31]. It is concluded from the literature study that the lower the value of porosity better the corrosion resistance [32,33]. Table 3 shows the porosity values of conventional ZrO2-Y2O3 and ZrO2-Y2O3-CNT coated T-91 steel specimens. The tabulated values clearly show that with the increase in CNT’s percentage in ZrO2- Y2O3, the porosity of the coatings decreases. The porosity was evaluated within the range of 3.45 to 4.25 % for the coatings under study. The specimen with ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT showed the lowest value of porosity among various coatings under investigation. Table 3. Average coating thickness and porosity of different coatings Substrate Coating type Coating thickness, µm Porosity, % ASTM SA-213 T-91 ZrO2-Y2O3 252 4.25 ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt,% CNT 254 3.62 ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt,% CNT 247 3.45 Microhardness measurement Figure 3 shows the microhardness profiles across the cross-section of conventional ZrO2-Y2O3 and CNT coated samples. The microhardness measurement for conventional ZrO2-Y2O3, 99 wt.% ZrO2- Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT, and 96 wt.% ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT coated specimens were in the range of 789-796, 908-910 and 1047-1051 Hv, respectively. Figure 3. Microhardness of CNT- ZrO2-Y2O3 reinforced coatings across the cross-section 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 -80 -40 0 40 80 120 160 200 M ic ro h a rd n e ss , V ic k e rs Distance from interface, µm ZrO₂-Y₂O₃ ZrO₂-Y₂O₃ and 2 wt.% CNT ZrO₂-Y₂O₃ and 4 wt.% CNT S. Kumar et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 881 It is observed clearly from Figure 3 that with the increase in CNT content in the ZrO2-Y2O3 matrix, the microhardness value of the coating increases. The graph shows the hardness profile along the cross-section of the substrate coating interface and hardness was found uniform across the surface of specimens. X-ray diffraction analysis The X-ray diffractions analysis for the surface of CNT- ZrO2-Y2O3 coated specimens was done at IIT Roorkee. The diffraction patterns are shown in Figures 4(a)-(c). The XRD curves of plasma-sprayed ZrO2-Y2O3 coated T-91 boiler tube steel sample showed ZrO2-Y2O3 as the main phase present during analysis. The XRD peaks of ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT and ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT composite coating also depicted ZrO2-Y2O3 as the main phase with a small proportion of carbon, as shown in Figure 4(b). C peaks indicate the presence of CNT content in the coating matrix peaks increased with an increase in CNT percentage, as shown in Figure 4(c). The C peaks in the diffraction pattern indicated that the CNTs were present in the pure carbon form in the coating matrix and had not reacted with ZrO2-Y2O3 to form any complex compounds. Figure 4. XRD profile of plasma sprayed: (a) conventional ZrO2-Y2O3; (b) ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT; (c) ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT coated specimen SEM micrographs with EDAX analysis of plasma-sprayed ZrO2-Y2O3, ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT and ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT coatings on T-91 boiler steel are shown in Figures 5(a)-(c). The coatings consist of interlocked particles having regular morphology with dense structure, as shown in SEM images. The SEM micrographs shown in Figures 5(b) and 5(c) indicate that the reinforcement of CNT in the coating powders forms a uniform coalescence of ZrO2-Y2O3 and CNT. EDAX analysis confirms the uniform dispersion of CNT in zirconia coating mixtures. Plasma sprayed CNT reinforced coatings over T-91 steel formulate lamellar and dense coating microstructures. EDAX results show the rich presence of Zr with O and some minor percentile of carbon in CNT-reinforced coatings. The http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888 CNT-REINFORCED ZrO2-Y2O3 COATED STEEL T-91 882 propositions of Zr, O and C in ceramic coatings are nearly approaching the composition of the blended powders used for coating deposition. Figure 5. SEM/EDAX of: (a) conventional ZrO2-Y2O3; (b) ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT; (c) ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT reinforced composite coatings Cross-sectional morphology The plasma spray conventional and CNT-reinforced samples were examined for cross-sectional morphology with the variation of elemental composition at different points, as shown in Figures 6(a)-(c). Due to the solidification and de-solidification of the molten droplet on the surface of the substrate, steel splat-type morphology can be visualized. The elemental analysis indicates the presence of Fe content in the substrate of coated specimens. With the reinforcement of CNT in the composite coatings, the traces of carbon content appear and the coatings show a rich percentage of zirconium, yttrium and oxygen. The content of zirconium, yttrium and oxygen were found uniform throughout the surface area, showing that all the composite coatings are uniform in elemental composition. S. Kumar et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 883 Figure 6. Cross-sectional morphology and the elemental composition of: (a) conventional ZrO2-Y2O3; (b) ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT; (c) ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT coatings Elemental X-ray mapping The ZrO2-Y2O3 and CNT-based ZrO2-Y2O3 composite coatings have been analyzed using the elemental X-ray mapping technique as shown in Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9. In the elemental analysis of the substrate part of all specimens show the rich presence of iron while the reinforced- CNT based coating matrix of specimens shows the presence of zirconium in rich dominance in all X- ray mapping along with the minor presence of carbon as shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9. C o n te n t, w t. % C o n te n t, w t. % C o n te n t, w t. % http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888 CNT-REINFORCED ZrO2-Y2O3 COATED STEEL T-91 884 Figure 7. X-ray mapping along the cross-sectional of conventional ZrO2-Y2O3 coating Figure 8. X-ray mapping along the cross-sectional of ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT coating S. Kumar et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 885 Figure 9. X-ray mapping along the cross-sectional of ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT coating Discussion The coating thickness of all samples was measured along the cross-section of coated specimens. The range of coating thickness was between 250- 270 µm and was uniform throughout the surface. The coating thickness was in the desired range as reported in the literature for plasma spray coatings. In conventional ZrO2-Y2O3 coating deposited over T-91 boiler tube steel, the porosity was found to be 4.25 percent which decreased with the addition of CNT in the ZrO2-Y2O3 composite matrix. The CNTs were able to lower the porosity of conventional ZrO2-Y2O3 coating. The plasma-sprayed CNT formed a locked structure with ZrO2-Y2O3 grains. The CNTs were able to fill the pores, which helped to decrease the porosity of the ZrO2-Y2O3 composite coating. There is a notable decrease in the value of porosity with an increase in the content of CNT content [16,34,35]. The microhardness values of conventional ZrO2-Y2O3 coated T-91 steel specimen was in the range of 789-796 Hv, as presented in Figure 3. With the addition of CNT in the ZrO2-Y2O3 composite matrix, the microhardness increased tremendously and was between 908-910 Hv for ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT coated T-91 specimen and 1047-1051 Hv for ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT coated T-91 specimen, respectively. The increase in microhardness results in enhancement in melting point and resistance to inden- tation [27,36,37]. The increase in microhardness results from CNT presence in the coating powder, which undergoes dispersion hardening. The improvement in microhardness of composite coating acknowledges the main role of CNT reinforcement [38]. ZrO2-Y2O3 was the main phase identified by X-ray diffraction analysis of the ZrO2-Y2O3 coated T-91 boiler steel specimen. The presence of carbon as small peaks in the CNT-based ZrO2-Y2O3 coated specimens proves the presence of pure carbon in the form of CNT. This reveals that CNTs were inert during the spraying and deposition process and have not chemically reacted with the zirconium and yttrium even at high temperatures of plasma spray during the coating process. The presence of carbon content in the X-ray diffraction graphs increases with the increase in the weight percent of CNT in the ZrO2-Y2O3 composite matrix. With the plasma spray process, the composite coatings on substrate T-91 boiler steel material solidify faster. This results in the formation of metastable phases, as presented in X-ray diffraction graphs. Similar findings were reported by researchers in their research work [28,39,40]. The results observed by http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888 CNT-REINFORCED ZrO2-Y2O3 COATED STEEL T-91 886 SEM/EDAX analysis of conventional ZrO2-Y2O3, ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT and ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT coated on T-91 boiler steel revealed that the coating is uniform and dense throughout the cross- section. CNT was completely coalescent with the ZrO2-Y2O3 matrix in the composite coating. EDAX analysis at selected points reveals the presence of zirconium, yttrium and oxygen, along with carbon in CNT reinforced coating matrix. As the weight percentage of CNT in ZrO2-Y2O3 coatings increases, the carbon content traces also increase. CNTs form bridge-like stricture between coating mat- rix [28,39,41]. The results for cross-sectional morphology for CNT-based ZrO2-Y2O3 composite coated T-91 specimens show a completely uniform and dense microstructure of coatings. There seems to be no gap between the interface of substrate and coating layer, which forms strong adhesion due to the good thermal properties of CNT [15]. The results shown by X-ray mapping help to identify the distribution of elements in coating throughout the cross-section. The mapping shows that Fe was present in a rich percentage in the substrate zone. Further coating zone of conventional ZrO2-Y2O3 indicates the presence Zr, Y and O, whereas CNT-based ZrO2-Y2O3 composite coatings show the presence of Zr, Y, O and C, which indicates the presence of CNT in the coating matrix. Conclusions The following conclusions are made from this experimental work: • In the present research work, conventional ZrO2-Y2O3 and CNT reinforced coatings having ZrO2-Y2O3 and 1 wt.% CNT and ZrO2-Y2O3 and 4 wt.% CNT coating were successfully deposited on T-91 boiler tube steel. • The coating formed had dense and uniform microstructure with coating thickness ranging from 250-270 µm. • The porosity of the coatings decreased with the increase in CNT weight percentage in the zirconium yttrium matrix, whereas the microhardness of the coatings increased with the addition of CNTs. • The microhardness of 4 wt.% of CNT reinforcement coated specimen was recorded between 1047-1051 Hv. Due to the strong bond between ZrO2-Y2O3 and CNT, the mechanical properties were improved. • Scanning electron microscopy morphology shows a uniform distribution of CNT with ZrO2-Y2O3 on T-91 substrate by the plasma spray process. Even at the high temperature of the plasma spray process, CNT was chemically stable and did not react with zirconium and yttrium. The traces of Zr, Y, O and C were shown in EDAX analysis, confirming the presence of major elements in the composite coatings. References [1] M. Esfandiari, H. Dong, Surface and Coatings Technology 202(3) (2007) 466-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.06.069 [2] R. A. Rapp, Corrosion Science 44(2) (2002) 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010- 38X(01)00057-9 [3] D. Sapundjiev, Corrosion Science 48(3) (2006) 577-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2005.04.001 [4] R. Sivakumar, S. V. Joshi, Transactions of Indian Ceramic Society 50(1) (1991) 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0371750X.1991.10804475 [5] H. Zhang, H. Lua, Y. Zhu, F. Li, R. Duan, M. Zhang, X. Wang, Powder Technology 227 (2012) 9- 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.02.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.06.069 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-38X(01)00057-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-38X(01)00057-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2005.04.001 https://doi.org/10.1080/0371750X.1991.10804475 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.02.007 S. Kumar et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 887 [6] B. Bhushan, B. K. Gupta, Handbook of Tribology: Materials, Coatings, and Surface Treatments McGraw-Hill, New York (1991) 259. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/441774 [7] K. Szyma, A. Hernas, G. Moskal, H. Myalska, Surface and Coatings Technology 268 (2015) 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.10.046 [8] N. Kahraman, B. Gülenc, Materials & Design 23(8) (2002) 721-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(02)00075-4 [9] H. S. Sidhu, B. S. Sidhu, S. Prakash, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 171(1) (2006) 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.058 [10] S. Deshpande, A. Kulkarni, S. Sampath, H. Herman, Surface and coatings Technology, 187(1) (2004) 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.01.032 [11] S. Kamal, R. Jayaganthan, S. Prakash, Surface Coatings Technology 203(8) (2009) 1004-1013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.09.031 [12] S. Iijima, Nature 354 (1991) 56-58. https://doi.org/10.1038/354056a0 [13] R. S. Ruoff, D. C. Lorents, Carbon 33(7) (1995) 925-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008- 6223(95)00021-5 [14] M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, P. C. Eklund, Sci. Fullerenes Carbon Nanotube 917 (1996) 870-917. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012221820-0/50020-4 [15] M. Sharma, V. Sharma, International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials 23(2) (2016) 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-016-1230-3 [16] K. Goyal, H. Singh, R. Bhatia, Advanced Engineering Forum 26 (2018) 53-66. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.26.53 [17] E. T. Thostenson, C. Li, T. W. Chou, Composites Science and Technology 65(3) (2005) 491-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.003 [18] C. F. Deng, D. Z. Wang, X. X. Zhang, A. B. Li, Materials Science and Engineering A 444(1) (2007)138-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.08.057 [19] M. K. Singla, H. Singh, V. Chawla, Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering 10(8) (2011) 717-726. [20] B. M. Praveen, T. V Venkatesha, Y. A. Naik, K. Prashantha, Surface and Coatings Technology 201(12) (2007) 5836-5842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.10.034 [21] K. Balani, S. P. Harimkar, A. Keshri, Y. Chen, N. B. Dahotre, A. Agarwal, Acta Materialia 56(20) 5984-5994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.020 [22] I. Ahmad, M. Unwin, H. Cao, H. Chen, H. Zhao, A. Kennedy, Y. Q. Zhu, Composites and Science Technology 70(8) (2010) 1199-1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.03.007 [23] A. K. Keshri, V. Singh, J. Huang, S. Seal, W. Choi, A. Agarwal, Surface and Coatings Technology 204(11) (2010) 1847-1855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.11.032 [24] M. O. Bodunrin, K. K. Alaneme, L. H. Chown, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 4(4) (2015) 434-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.05.003 [25] C. F. Gutierrez-Gonzalez, A. Smirnov, A. Centeno, A. Fernández, B. Alonso, V. G. Rocha, R. Torrecillas, A. Zurutuza, J. F. Bartolome, Ceramics International 41(6) (2015) 7434-7438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.061 [26] K. Goyal, World Journal of Engineering 15(4) (2018) 429-439. https://doi.or/10.1108/WJE-10- 2017-0315 [27] H. Chen, X. Zhou, C. Ding, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 23(9) (2003) 1449-1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00345-X [28] K. Goyal, H. Singh, and R. Bhatia, Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society 55(2) (2019) 315- 322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-018-0237-9 [29] B. S. Sidhu, D. Puri, S. Prakash, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 159(3) (2005) 347- 355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.023 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1228 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/441774 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.10.046 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(02)00075-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.058 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.01.032 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.09.031 https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00021-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00021-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012221820-0/50020-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-016-1230-3 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.26.53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.08.057 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.10.034 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.03.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.11.032 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.05.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.061 https://doi.or/10.1108/WJE-10-2017-0315 https://doi.or/10.1108/WJE-10-2017-0315 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00345-X https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-018-0237-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.023 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(5) (2022) 877-888 CNT-REINFORCED ZrO2-Y2O3 COATED STEEL T-91 888 [30] K. Katiki, S. Yadlapati, S. N. S. Chidepudi, P. R. Hari, International Journal of ChemTech Research 6(11) (2014) 4579-4584. https://www.sphinxsai.com/2014/ch_vol6_no11/1/(4579- 4584)N14.pdf [31] J. Mehta, V. K. Mittal, and P. Gupta, Journal of Applied Science and Engineering 20(4) (2017) 445-452. https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2017.20.4.05 [32] S. S. Chatha, H. S. Sidhu, B. S. Sidhu, Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization & Engineering 11(06) (2012) 569-586. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2012.116041 [33] P.-H. Gao, Y.-G. Li, C.-J. Li, G.-J. Yang, C.-X. Li, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology 17 (2008) 742-749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-008-9258-1 [34] A. Pathak, S. Mathiyalagam, K. K. Pandey, P. Bijalwan, M. Dutta, A. K. Keshri, International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology 16(6) (2019) 2306-2315. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.13327 [35] W. Guo, H. Y. Tam, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 72 (2014) 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5661-6 [36] J. Ning, J. Zhang, Y. Pan, J. Guo, Materials Science and Engineering A 357(1–2) (2003) 392- 396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00256-9 [37] E. Edward Anand, S. Natarajan, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 24(1) (2015) 128-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-1306-z [38] P. R. Silva, V. O. Almeida, G. B. MacHado, E. V. Benvenutti, T. M. H. Costa, M. R. Gallas, Langmuir 28(2) (2012) 1447-1452. https://doi.org/10.1021/la203056f [39] A. K. Keshri, A. Agarwal, Surface and Coatings Technology 206(2-3) (2011) 338-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.07.025 [40] B. Singh, D. Puri, S. Prakash, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 159(3) (2005) 347- 355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.023 [41] C. F. Deng, D. Z. Wang, X. X. Zhang, A. B. Li, Materials Science and Engineering A 444(1-2) (2007) 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.08.057 ©2022 by the authors; licensee IAPC, Zagreb, Croatia. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) https://www.sphinxsai.com/2014/ch_vol6_no11/1/(4579-4584)N14.pdf https://www.sphinxsai.com/2014/ch_vol6_no11/1/(4579-4584)N14.pdf https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2017.20.4.05 https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2012.116041 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-008-9258-1 https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.13327 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5661-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00256-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-1306-z https://doi.org/10.1021/la203056f https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.07.025 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.08.057 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)