{Electrochemical corrosion performance of Si-doped Al-based automotive alloy in 0.1 M NaCl solution:} http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 565 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576; http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 Open Access : : ISSN 1847-9286 www.jESE-online.org Original scientific paper Electrochemical corrosion performance of Si-doped Al-based automotive alloy in 0.1 M NaCl solution Maglub Al Nur1, Akib Abdullah Khan1, Somlata Dev Sharma1 and Mohammad Salim Kaiser2, 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh 2Directorate of Advisory, Extension and Research Services, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh Corresponding author: mskaiser@iat.buet.ac.bd; Tel.: +88-02-9663129; Fax: +88-02-9665622 Received: May 6, 2022; Accepted: June 6, 2022; Published: June 13, 2022 Abstract The aim of this study is to investigate the electrochemical corrosion behavior of Al-Si automotive alloys with different levels of Si doping in 0.1 M NaCl solution at room temperature. The study was performed by electrochemical method, using potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy techniques. The condition of surfaces was characterized by both optical and scanning electron microscopy. Both the EIS and Tafel analyses revealed that the corrosion resistance was improved with the addition of Si up to the eutectic point, what is due to the formation of protective oxide films. The higher Si added alloys showed lower values of current density, while the corrosion potential was shifted to a more positive direction. For higher Si added alloys, a higher amount of Mg2Si was formed as precipitates, which tend to form oxides such as SiO2 and MgO, further protecting the surfaces from corrosion. It can be observed from the micrographs that the scratches from polishing are removed after corrosion. Additionally, the SEM images reveal that corroded surfaces appear to have pits that are less noticeable in alloys with a greater Si content, suggesting thus the formation of a protective layer of oxides. Keywords Al-Si automotive alloy; protective oxide layer; corrosion potential; polarization resistance; microstructure Introduction Automotive industry focus on lightweight materials like aluminium-silicon alloys for manu- facturing automotive components like engine blocks, cylinder heads, pistons, intake manifolds and other parts, replacing steel and cast iron [1-3]. These lightweight materials not only increase fuel efficiency but also enhance properties such as high elongation values, high strength-to-weight ratio, and excellent corrosion resistance [4,5]. Recently, diesel and direct fuel gasoline engines were developed, which have a high specific power. Because of working in diverse environments, these http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 http://www.jese-online.org/ mailto:mskaiser@iat.buet.ac.bd J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576 CORROSION OF Si DOPED Al-BASED AUTOMOTIVE ALLOY 566 engines have a significant performance influence on piston materials [6]. Corrosion is the process through which materials, especially metals, gradually deteriorate due to chemical or electro- chemical reactions with their surroundings. Corrosion of engine components results in loss of strength, hardness, toughness, and other desirable mechanical properties, which deteriorates engine performance. Pure Al is highly resistive to corrosion due to a passive film formed on its surface when exposed to the atmosphere. However, in the case of Al alloys, corrosion resistance decreases as various alloying elements are added, such as Cu, Mg and Fe. These alloying elements have their effects on the corrosion properties of Al-Si alloys. One important parameter affecting mechanical properties and corrosion resistance is the silicon content [7,8]. When silicon is added as the major alloying element, the alloy goes into the 4xxx series. The alloy can be hyper-eutectic, eutectic, or hypo- eutectic, depending on the percentage of silicon in it. If there is 12.6 wt.% Si in the Al-Si alloy, it is the eutectic alloy. The alloy is hypo and hyper eutectic if the percentage of Si in the Al-Si alloy is lower and higher than 12.6 wt.%, respectively [9,10]. The mechanical properties of Al-Si alloys are enhanced in higher Si added alloys, but after the eutectic composition, the strength properties start to deteriorate, as coarse polyhedral particles appear after eutectic composition, which is in fact, primary silicon [11]. If Cu is present in the experimental alloys, it helps resist corrosion by forming a protective oxide layer, approximately 900 to 1000 nm thick [12]. The addition of Si along with Mg into the alloy creates the precipitates of Mg2Si, which facilitate the formation of oxides like SiO2 and MgO as protective layers. These oxides further protect the surfaces from corrosion [13]. Iron as an alloying element tends to form a iron-rich layer in Fe2O3, which diminishes corrosion resistance [14]. The automotive alloy can get in contact with many solutions. The piston and cylinder of the engine continuously are in contact with engine fuels. Often, some unexpected chemicals may mix with the fuel. Sodium chloride can enter the fuels as sodium careers [15,16]. Also, sodium chloride is present in engine cooling water, which has a deleterious effect on engine materials [17]. One of the key factors of nucleation of pitting is the adsorption of aggressive ions such as Cl- into the faults in the protective layer and their penetration and accumulation in these imperfections [18,19]. There are some studies about the role of Si as an alloying element on the corrosion resistance, and the effect of NaCl as a corrosive medium for Al-Si alloys. Role of other alloying elements in automotive Al-Si alloys, such as Cu, Mg, Fe, Ni, etc., and investigations of their influence on mechanical and corrosion properties are ongoing. However, there is limited work on the effect of Si on the corrosion behavior of automotive alloys, keeping the percentages of other alloying elements constant. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the corrosion behavior of automotive alloys with various levels of Si, including an alloy with Si as trace impurity, keeping the concen- trations of other constituent elements constant, in NaCl solution of 0.1 M strength. The elec- trochemical investigations have been carried out using the electrochemical impedance spectro- scopy (EIS) method, which provides values of solution resistance, polarization resistance, and double-layer capacitance. Besides, the potentiodynamic polarization technique is also used, which provides the values of corrosion current, corrosion potential and corrosion rate. Experimental To study the corrosion behavior of Al-based automotive alloy, Si of the different amounts was added to the alloy. For this purpose, commercially pure aluminium (Al 99.750), copper (Cu 99.997), magnesium (Mg 99.80) and Al-50 wt.% Si master alloy ingots were used. The levels of Cu and Mg were kept constant to investigate the effect of Si as an alloying element. Fe, Ni, Sn, Sb, etc, were M. Al Nur et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 567 also present in the alloys as trace impurities. The Shimadzu PDA 7000 optical emission spectrometer was used to determine the chemical composition of the test alloys. The main constituents of five alloys are given in Table 1. Table 1. Chemical composition of experimental alloys (wt.%) Alloy Content, wt.% Si Cu Mg Fe Ni Al Alloy 1 0.244 2.158 0.767 0.211 0.199 Bal Alloy 2 3.539 2.309 0.784 0.273 0.217 Bal Alloy 3 6.149 2.113 0.754 0.301 0.264 Bal Alloy 4 12.656 2.130 0.770 0.311 0.277 Bal Alloy 5 17.851 2.190 0.755 0.321 0.281 Bal A natural gas-fired pit furnace and a graphite crucible were used to melt these alloys. To avoid oxidation during melting, a suitable flux cover was used. For the casting, a mild steel mold of 20  200 300 millimeters was preheated to 250 °C. A muffle furnace was used for homogenization, kept at 450 °C for 12 hours, and then air-cooled to relieve stress. The homogenized samples were solutionized at 535 °C for 2 hours. Then the alloys were quenched in salt water to get a super saturated single-phase region. Afterwards, the alloys were machined to remove the natural oxide layer. Rectangular samples of the alloys (5  5  12 mm) were machined from the cast products. To achieve a smooth and refined surface, samples were polished using 320, 600, 800, 1200 and 2000 grit emery sheets. All the samples were subjected to age hardening at 200 °C for 4 hours to get the maximum strength [20,21]. A typical digital microscope was used for microstructural observations. The whole experiment was carried out at room temperature, at 25 ± 1 °C. The densities as well as equivalent weights of the alloys were calculated from the chemical composition. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of the experimental alloys was performed using a computerized CH Instrument – Electrochemical Workstation. Analytical reagent grade NaCl was dissolved in deionized water to prepare 0.1 M solution of NaCl. The tests were carried out in a standard three-electrode glass cell with a capacity of 100 mL. Ag/AgCl-KCl was used as a reference electrode, a platinum electrode was employed as a counter electrode and an experimental alloy sample was used as a working electrode. Only 4  4 millimeters of the surface of each working electrode was exposed to NaCl solution, while the remaining surface was coated with PVC heat shrink tube. A thin wire was connected to the working electrode to complete the circuit. The working electrode was immersed in 100 mL of NaCl solution, and about 30 min of time interval was given to the system to attain a steady-state. The OCP values of samples were determined by measuring the voltage between the working and reference electrodes by the electrochemical workstation. Before EIS analysis, the sinusoidal voltage amplitude was set to 5 mV, and the frequency range from 100 kHz to 0.2 Hz was explored. NaCl solution was refilled periodically during the experimental runs to ensure more precision. The EIS experiments were performed at open circuit potential values, and impedance data were collected for the above-mentioned frequency range. Afterwards, analogous electrical circuits were designed using the data analysis program EC-Lab Analyst. Equivalent circuits were matched to experimental data, and the circuit with maximum accuracy was selected. Thus, the values of the respective circuit components, i.e., solution resistance (RS), corrosion resistance (RP), and effective double-layer capacitance (CP(eff)), were calculated. Moreover, the goodness of fits was determined from discrepancies between the experimental and fitted data. http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576 CORROSION OF Si DOPED Al-BASED AUTOMOTIVE ALLOY 568 Using the same experimental setup as for the EIS, the potentiodynamic polarization experiments were performed similarly. The potential range against the reference electrode was adjusted at -1 to +1 V. The scan rate was set at 0.50 mV s-1. Following the conclusion of the experiment, the relevant Tafel polarization plots were plotted. For each of the experimental alloys, the corrosion potential (Ecorr) in mV, the corrosion current (Icorr) in A, and the corrosion rate in millimeters per year were determined using the Tafel polarization plot. After the experiment, the sample surfaces were degraded and examined using a conventional optical microscope and a scanning electron microscope. The formula for determining the corrosion rate in mm year-1 is in accordance with ASTM Standard G 102 defined as: corrCorrosion rate = I K EW A (1) where Icorr = corrosion current in A, K = constant defining the units of corrosion rate in mm year-1 (here, K = 3272 mm (A cm year)-1 from ASTM Standard G 102), EW = equivalent weight in gram/equ- ivalent, ρ = density of alloy in g cm-3 and A = surface area in cm2. Results and discussion Impedance measurements Results calculated by fitting the equivalent circuit to experimental data are listed in Table 2. A few circuits were modeled to fit experimental EIS data, and the best-fitted one is presented in Figure 1. Rp denotes the polarization or corrosion resistance equivalent to charge transfer resistance, Rs denotes the ohmic solution resistance of the electrolyte and Cp(eff) represents effective electrical double layer capacitance, which impedance is sometimes replaced by the impedance of the constant phase element. It can be noted that the values of Rs are negligible compared to those of Rp. Polarization resistance is related to the working electrode, while solution resistance, here of 0.1 M NaCl, is related mostly to the uncompensated resistance of the electrolyte solution between working and reference electrodes. Results of previous studies indicated that polarization resistance is inversely related to the corrosion rate of a metal, which gives information about the rate of reactivity of the surface with the environment [22-25]. From the data given in Table 2, it can be seen that the value of polarization resistance increases for higher silicon-added alloys up to the eutectic composition of 12.7Si. In other words, the corrosion rate decreases up to the eutectic point, making 12.7Si the most corrosion resistant alloy among the samples. According to previous studies, the OCP value increases or shifts toward a more positive value as corrosion resistance increases. Hence, a more positive value of OCP means higher corrosion resistance [22]. From the experimental data, the values of the open circuit potential shift to a more positive direction for higher Si-added alloys. The effective double-layer capacitance (Cp(eff)) value decreases to 12.7Si, then it increases to 17.9Si. Figure 1. Equivalent electrical circuit used to fit EIS data of automotive Al-Si alloys M. Al Nur et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 569 Table 2. Test results from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and OCP values Alloy OCP, V vs. SCE Rs / Ω Rp / Ω Cp(eff) / µF Goodness of fit Alloy 1 (0.2Si) -0.66048 42 14040 12.91 0.04703 Alloy 2 (3.5Si) -0.65451 55.97 16947 12.75 0.07666 Alloy 3 (6.1Si) -0.64811 67.56 18121 12.62 0.06434 Alloy 4 (12.7Si) -0.63539 66.91 23708 11.62 0.0257 Alloy 5 (17.9Si) -0.62005 65.72 18379 21.51 0.06588 Figure 2 shows Nyquist diagrams of the experimental impedance measurements for all the automotive Al-Si alloys immersed in 0.1 M NaCl solution. The real (Zreal) and imaginary (-Zimaginary) parts of the impedance are represented at the x and y axes, respectively. For each of the experimental alloys, the imaginary component of the impedance (-Zimaginary) against the real part (Zreal) is derived using the capacitive-resistive model. A single full semicircular appearance on the Nyquist diagram indicates that the corrosion of Al–Si alloy is regulated by the charge transfer process [26]. Small distortion in diagrams may be due to frequency dispersion [25]. Figure 2 shows Nyquist plots that are slightly depressed, indicating that they are not perfect semicircles as expected by EIS theory. This discrepancy can be explained by the non-ideal behavior of the double layer as a capacitor [27,28]. Figure 2. Nyquist plots for experimental automotive alloys in 0.1 M NaCl solution at room temperature The impedance data obtained are displayed as Bode plots in Figure 3. The Bode magnitude plot displays the impedance modulus versus frequency (Figure 3(a)), and the Bode phase plot displays the phase angle versus frequency (Figure 3(b)). a b Figure 3. Bode plots for experimental alloys: (a) Bode magnitude plots (|Z| vs. frequency)), (b) Bode phase plot (phase angle vs. frequency) 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 -Z im a g in a ry / Ω Zreal / Ω 0.2Si 3.5Si 6.1Si 12.7Si 17.9Si 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 10 100 1000 10000 100000 |Z | / Ω f / Hz 0.2Si 3.5Si 6.1Si 12.7Si 17.9Si 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 -φ / ° f / Hz 0.2Si 3.5Si 6.1Si 12.7Si 17.9Si http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576 CORROSION OF Si DOPED Al-BASED AUTOMOTIVE ALLOY 570 Potentiodynamic polarization analysis The Tafel plots or potentiodynamic polarization curves of the aluminium-silicon alloys with varying concentrations of silicon are shown in Figure 4. Table 3 displays the parameters obtained from the potentiodynamic polarization analysis. Icorr represents the corrosion current, which is the dissolution current at the corrosion potential. The corrosion potential, Ecorr is a mixed potential in which the rate of anodic dissolution equals the rate of cathodic reactions, and there is no net current flowing in or out of the electrode. This potential is also known as open circuit potential or rest potential [29]. Ecorr represents the ability of metal and nonmetal surfaces to lose electrons in the presence of an electrolyte, and the corrosion rate is shown in mm/y, which is the amount of corrosion loss in thickness per year. It can be interpreted that both the corrosion current and corrosion rate decrease as the concentration of Si is increased up to 12.7 wt.%, and then increase again for the alloy with 17.9 wt.% Si. According to the chemical composition, there is about 0.8 wt.% Mg in each of the alloys and so, in higher Si added alloys, the amount of Mg2Si formed is higher. This intermetallic phase is added to a protective layer as oxides, which disrupt the corrosion process [13]. The results from previous investigations prove the presence of Al2O3 when electrochemical corrosion occurs at surfaces of Al-Si alloys in 0.1 M NaCl [30]. Again, Si addition may allow the formation of Fe2SiAl7 interdiffusion layer, limiting the growth of Fe-Al intermetallic phases [30]. However, such intermetallic layers only provide barrier protection, not cathodic protection [31]. To be added, the thickness of the diffusion layer has been considered an important factor for better corrosion performance, as the Al-Si coating is susceptible to microcrack due to different thermal expansion coefficients between coating and substrate. Table 3. Corrosion parameters resulted from potentiodynamic polarization analysis Alloy Icorr / µA Ecorr / mV Corrosion rate, mm year-1 Alloy 1 (0.2Si) 20.178 -597.538 0.8858 Alloy 2 (3.5Si) 18.156 -583.639 0.7954 Alloy 3 (6.1Si) 17.321 -583.112 0.7575 Alloy 4 (12.7Si) 13.491 -574.055 0.5865 Alloy 5 (17.9Si) 17.845 -577.849 0.771 Figure 4. Potentiodynamic polarization curves of automotive Al-Si alloys with varying levels of Si tested in 0.1 M NaCl 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 -0.70 -0.65 -0.60 -0.55 -0.50 E / V v s . S C E I / A 0.2Si 3.5Si 6.1Si 12.7Si 17.9Si M. Al Nur et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 571 The microcracks do not propagate through thick diffusion layers [32,33]. The Mg2Si phase allows cathodic protection, enhancing the anti-corrosion performance of Al-Si alloys. From the values of corrosion potential (Ecorr), it is found that the values shift towards a more positive direction for higher Si added alloys, up to a eutectic point, which indicates better corrosion performance in higher Si added alloys [34]. An exception is noted in the case of 17.9Si added alloy. The probable reason is that beyond the eutectic composition, more primary Si is created in the matrix, which has needles or plate-like Al-Si eutectic. These structures are dispersed in such a way that creates pores on the surfaces of the alloys. As a result, excess corrosion occurs at the sites where pores exist. Again, because of Mg2Si particles, the alloy is more prone to localized corrosion [35]. The minor scatter in the potentiodynamic curves could be due to surface conditions such as surface porosity, the existence of un-melted powder, and the density of melt pool borders at the surface [36]. Optical micrographic investigation Figure 5 shows optical micrographs of the polished surfaces of 0.2Si, 3.5Si, 6.1Si, 12.7Si and 17.9Si doped experimental alloys before and after corrosion in 0.1 M NaCl solution. Not enough information can be extracted from these types of unetched microstructures, but some apparent observations can be made. There are Al-rich dendritic matrix, eutectic Si, and some different intermetallic phases in these microstructures. In this type of image, precipitations of Fe and Cu with Al appear in a darker tone, whereas Si and Mg with Al appear in a lighter tone. As a result of the varying quantities of Si, the alloys display different levels of tone, which is visible in Figure 5. As the experimental alloys went through the electrochemical corrosion process, corrosion was observed on the surfaces at different intensities according to Si concentration. Optical micrographs of the surfaces of the alloys after corrosion presented in Figure 5 show concentrated attacks on different locations of each experimental alloy surface, generated by corrosion products dissolving into the surrounding environment, i.e., 0.1 M NaCl solution. Comparing the micrographs of the surfaces of the alloys before and after corrosion, it is visible that the polished marks completely disappeared after corrosion. The corroded surfaces seem to have pit formations that are lower for higher Si-added alloys. The factor controlling this characteristic might be the intermetallics containing Si, one of which is Mg2Si. This intermetallic tends to form MgO and SiO2 during corrosion, serving as protective films which are thicker for higher Si-added alloys [13,30]. Besides, Al2O3 and Al(OH)3 are also formed as a protective coating in every experimental automotive alloy [30,37,38]. The formation of pits may be attributed to the fact that the intermetallics fall off the surfaces due to the dissolution of the surrounding matrix. It is noted that the surface of the 17.9Si added alloy exhibits the most obliteration among the surfaces of all experimental alloys, which is due to the increased amount of primary silicon in that alloy. Increased surface pinholes can be discerned on the surfaces of the hypereutectic alloy, which may be attributed to intermetallic particles created by high impurity. These surface pinholes indicate an excessive pitting corrosion mechanism [39]. SEM and EDX observations Figure 6 shows the surface morphology of corroded surfaces of various Si-added experimental alloys after electrochemical corrosion in 0.1 M NaCl solution using SEM images. SEM photographs prove the corrosion of intermetallic compounds on the surface of each of the experimental alloys. In higher Si added alloys, the rough polish marks are more visible, except in the 17.9Si alloy, as corrosion is more prominent in that alloy. Moreover, numerous surface defects as pinholes are also identified in the SEM image of 17.9Si added sample, similar to the optical image. http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576 CORROSION OF Si DOPED Al-BASED AUTOMOTIVE ALLOY 572 Before corrosion After corrosion Alloy 1 Alloy 2 Alloy 3 Alloy 4 Alloy 5 Figure 5. Microstructure of polished Al-Si alloys before and after corrosion in 0.1 M NaCl solution 150m M. Al Nur et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 573 Figure 6. SEM images and EDX spectra of Al-Si alloys after exposure to 0.1 M NaCl solution: (a) 0.2Si, (b) 3.5Si, (c) 6.1Si, (d) 12.7Si, (e) 17.9Si (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576 CORROSION OF Si DOPED Al-BASED AUTOMOTIVE ALLOY 574 Selective dissolution of primary aluminium phases over a depth of a few micrometers creates the pinholes [39]. The images prove that there are localized corrosion and discrete pits on the surfaces of the samples. More pits can be identified in the lower Si added alloys, indicating their less resistivity to corrosion. Pit development is most likely the result of intermetallic compounds dissolving from the alloy surface into the surrounding environment. It is also possible that the pits are formed as a result of selective dissipation of the alloy second phase particles. Because there was no dissolution of corrosion products into the surrounding matrix, the majority of corrosion products are visible on the surfaces in SEM photographs. The corrosion products that occur on the surfaces are dispersed unevenly. A protective layer is also observable on the surface of every corroded alloy, which seems to be thicker in higher Si-added alloys. Overall, the SEM images dictate that the corrosive property is improved as Si is added into automotive alloys if other constituent alloying elements are kept fixed up to the eutectic point. From the quantitative EDX analysis the alloys show following chemical compositions in wt.%: 0.2 Si added Alloy 1: 27.25 % O, 0.46 % Mg, 0.74 % Si 3.5 Si added Alloy 2: 14.75 % O, 0.74 % Mg, 4.64 % Si 6.1 Si added Alloy 3: 13.70 % O, 0.50 % Mg, 9.81 % Si 12.7 Si added Alloy 4: 11.37 % O, 0.55 % Mg, 21.17 % Si 17.9 Si added Alloy 5: 10.73 % O, 0.58 % Mg, 21.53 % Si One interesting observation is that the percentage of oxygen decreases at higher Si-added alloys. As wt.% of Si is increased, more elements from the surface are depleted as oxides, and the corrosion products remain on the surface, which is the reason for the higher percentage of oxygen in lower silicon-added alloys. EDX data shows the oxygen percentage decreases even after the eutectic point, the trend not aligning with the previous results. The probable reason is that oxides are formed due to Si, which follows the same trend in the hypereutectic alloy. But the corrosion is not protected the same way after the eutectic point for the surface defects created. Another observation is that the wt.% of Si and Mg is more than the wt.% found from the chemical composition determined by the spectrometer in every alloy. Although other elements are dissolved into the solution, increased Si does not dissolve and forms Mg2Si, which is involved in protecting the materials from corrosion, as discussed earlier. Conclusions Based on the above discussions, the following conclusions are emphasized: Alloys with higher Si content have better corrosion resistance up to eutectic composition if other components are kept constant. It occurs due to the formation of protective layers of SiO2 and MgO by Mg2Si, which is more pronounced in higher Si-added alloys. Beyond eutectic composition, the corrosion resistance tends to fall since the plate-like morphology of hyper-eutectic intermetallic results in surface pinholes. It is observed that the surfaces are demolished to some extent after corrosion. Again, observing the optical micrographs and SEM images, the surface deterioration seems lesser in higher Si added alloys but exceptionally higher in 17.9Si added alloy. Oxide layers are formed after corrosion for all alloys, but the layers are thicker in higher Si-added alloys, which is visible in both optical and SEM images. The percentage of oxygen on the surface of an alloy is less for higher Si added alloy, as less corrosion product is formed. M. Al Nur et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 575 Differences in electrochemical behavior appeared due to differences in their chemical compositions and microstructures. The percentage of Si as alloying element determines the overall corrosion behavior of as-cast Al-Si alloys in this study. Acknowledgements: It is supported by the Department of Mechanical Engineering of Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka. Thanks to Department of Chemistry for the laboratory facilities. References [1] S. Samat, M. Z. Omar, A. H. Baghdadi, I. F. Mohamed, A. M. Aziz, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 10 (2021) 1086-1102. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.085 [2] H. Ye, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 12 (2003) 288-297. https://dx.doi.org/10.1361/105994903770343132 [3] M. Guo, M. Sun, J. Huang, S. Pang, Metals 12 (2022) 142. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/met12010142 [4] L. F. Gomes, C. L. Kugelmeier, A. Garcia, C. A. Della Rovere, J. E. Spinelli, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 15 (2021) 5880-5893. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.11.043 [5] W.. Miller, L. Zhuang, J. Bottema, A. Wittebrood, P. De Smet, A. Haszler, A. Vieregge, Materials Science and Engineering: A 280 (2000) 37-49. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921- 5093(99)00653-X [6] T. Tanaka, T. Akasawa, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 8 (1999) 463-468. https://dx.doi.org/10.1361/105994999770346774 [7] P. R. Goulart, J. E. Spinelli, W. R. Osório, A. Garcia, Materials Science and Engineering: A 421 (2006) 245-253. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.050 [8] S. Tahamtan, A. Fadavi Boostani, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 20 (2010) 1702-1706. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(09)60361-7 [9] M. Haghshenas, J. Jamali, Case Studies in Engineering Failure Analysis 8 (2017) 11-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csefa.2016.11.003 [10] F. Alshmri, Advanced Materials Research 774–776 (2013) 1271-1276. https://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.774-776.1271 [11] H. Torabian, J. P. Pathak, S. N. Tiwari, Wear 172 (1994) 49-58. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(94)90298-4 [12] A. Schüssler, H. E. Exner, Corrosion Science 34 (1993) 1793-1802. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(93)90017-B [13] R. Escalera-Lozano, M. I. Pech-Canul, M. A. Pech-Canul, M. Montoya-Davila, A. Uribe-Salas, The Open Corrosion Journal 3 (2010) 73-79. https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1876503301003010073 [14] L. Wen, Y. Wang, Y. Zhou, L. X. Guo, J. H. Ouyang, Materials Chemistry and Physics 126 (2011) 301-309. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.11.022 [15] M. D. Cardenas Almena, O. Lucio Esperilla, F. Martin Manzanero, Y. Murillo Duarte, L. C. Quintero Toscano, G. Wolff, SAE Technical paper 2012-01-1689, 2012. https://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-1689 [16] J. Barker, S. Cook, P. Richards, SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants 6 (2013) 826-838. https://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-2687 [17] A. Abdel-Wahab, B. Batchelor, Water Environment Research 74 (2002) 256-263. https://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143002X139983 http://dx.doi.org/10.5599/jese.1373 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.085 https://dx.doi.org/10.1361/105994903770343132 https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/met12010142 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.11.043 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00653-X https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00653-X https://dx.doi.org/10.1361/105994999770346774 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.050 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(09)60361-7 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csefa.2016.11.003 https://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.774-776.1271 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(94)90298-4 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(93)90017-B https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1876503301003010073 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.11.022 https://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-1689 https://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-2687 https://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143002X139983 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 12(3) (2022) 565-576 CORROSION OF Si DOPED Al-BASED AUTOMOTIVE ALLOY 576 [18] P. Marcus, Corrosion Mechanism in Theory and Practice, J. Oudar (Ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995. ISBN-10: 082479592X [19] E. S. M. Sherif, International Journal of Electrochemical Science 7 (2012) 4235-4249. http://www.electrochemsci.org/papers/vol7/7054235.pdf [20] S. Toschi, Metals 8 (2018) 961. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/met8110961 [21] M. S. Kaiser, M. R. Basher, A. S. W. Kurny, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 21 (2012) 1504-1508. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-011-0057-3 [22] S. Choudhary, A. Garg, K. Mondal, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 25 (2016) 2969-2976. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2112-6 [23] A. Hossain, M.A. Gafur, F. Gulshan, A.S.W. Kurny, International Journal of Chemical, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering 8 (2014) 719-723. [24] A. S. Fouda, F. S. Mohamed, M. W. El-Sherbeni, Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion 2 (2016) 11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40735-016-0039-y [25] J. Bessone, C. Mayer, K. Jüttner, W. J. Lorenz, Electrochimica Acta 28 (1983) 171-175. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(83)85105-6 [26] X. Li, S. Deng, H. Fu, G. Mu, Corrosion Science 51 (2009) 620-634. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.12.021 [27] J. Cruz, T. Pandiyan, E. García-Ochoa, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 583 (2005) 8- 16. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.02.026 [28] W. A. W. E. Amira, A. A. Rahim, H. Osman, K. Awang, P.B. Raja, International Journal of Electrochemical Science 6 (2011) 2998-3016. https://dx.doi.org/10.1.1.655.3240 [29] X. G. Zhang, Corrosion Potential and Corrosion Current in: Corrosion and Electrochemistry of Zinc, Springer US, Boston, MA, 1996, pp. 125-156. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757- 9877-7_5. [30] C. Kim, S. Cho, W. Yang, A. I. Karayan, H. Castaneda, Corrosion Science 183 (2021) 109339. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109339 [31] L. Dosdat, J. Petitjean, T. Vietoris, O. Clauzeau, Steel Research International 82 (2011) 726- 733. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/srin.201000291 [32] E. Billur, Hot Stamping of Ultra High-Strength Steels, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98870-2 [33] Y.-Y. Chang, C.-C. Tsaur, J.C. Rock, Surface and Coatings Technology 200 (2006) 6588-6593. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.11.038 [34] M. Abdallah, E. M. Kamar, S. Eid, A. Y. El-Etre, Journal of Molecular Liquids 220 (2016) 755- 761. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.062 [35] F. Eckermann, T. Suter, P. J. Uggowitzer, A. Afseth, P. Schmutz, Electrochimica Acta 54 (2008) 844-855. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2008.05.078 [36] R. I. Revilla, J. Liang, S. Godet, I. De Graeve, Journal of The Electrochemical Society 164 (2017) C27-C35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.0461702jes [37] I.-W. Huang, B. L. Hurley, F. Yang, R.G. Buchheit, Electrochimica Acta 199 (2016) 242-253. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.125 [38] G. Šekularac, I. Milošev, Corrosion Science 144 (2018) 54-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.038 [39] M. G. Mueller, M. Fornabaio, A. Mortensen, Journal of Materials Science 52 (2017) 858- 868. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0381-y ©2022 by the authors; licensee IAPC, Zagreb, Croatia. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) http://www.electrochemsci.org/papers/vol7/7054235.pdf https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/met8110961 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-011-0057-3 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2112-6 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40735-016-0039-y https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(83)85105-6 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.12.021 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.02.026 https://dx.doi.org/10.1.1.655.3240 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9877-7_5 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9877-7_5 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109339 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/srin.201000291 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98870-2 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.11.038 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.062 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2008.05.078 https://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.0461702jes https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.125 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.038 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0381-y https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)