Influence of operating parameters on electrocoagulation of C.I. disperse yellow 3 doi: 10.5599/jese. 2014.0065 271 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283; doi: 10.5599/jese.2014.0065 Open Access : : ISSN 1847-9286 www.jESE-online.org Original scientific paper Influence of operating parameters on electrocoagulation of C.I. disperse yellow 3 Djamel Ghernaout* , ** , , Abdulaziz Ibraheem Al-Ghonamy**, Mohamed Wahib Naceur*, Noureddine Ait Messaoudene** and Mohamed Aichouni** *Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Blida, PO Box 270, Blida 09000, Algeria **Binladin Research Chair on Quality and Productivity Improvement in the Construction Industry; College of Engineering, University of Hail, PO Box 2440, Ha’il 81441, Saudi Arabia Corresponding Author: E-mail: djamel_andalus@yahoo.fr Tel.: +213-025-433-631; Fax: +213-025-433-631 Received: July 24, 2014; Revised: August 14, 2014; Published: December 6, 2014 Abstract This work deals with the electrocoagulation (EC) process for an organic dye removal. The chosen organic dye is C.I. disperse yellow 3 (DY) which is used in textile industry. Experiments were performed in batch mode using Al electrodes and for comparison purposes Fe electrodes. The experimental set-up was composed of 1 L beaker, two identical electrodes which are separated 2 cm from each other. The main operating parameters influencing EC process were examined such as pH, supporting electrolyte concentration CNaCl, current density i, and DY concentration. High performance EC process was shown during 45 min for 200 mg/L dye concentration at i = 350 A m -2 (applied voltage 12 V) and CNaCl = 1 g L -1 reaching 98 % for pHs 3 and 10 and 99 % for pH 6. After 10 min, DY was also efficiently removed (86 %) showing that EC process may be conveniently applied for textile industry wastewater treatment. EC using Fe electrodes exhibited slightly lower performance comparing EC using Al electrodes. Keywords: Dye removal; aluminium; iron; current density; mechanism. Introduction The main problem of access to safe drinking water is continuous pollution of water resources by agriculture, urban waste and industry. In countries where water resources are relatively limited, treated wastewater reuse in agriculture has become an urgent necessity. The textile industry consumes considerable amounts of water in the dyeing and finishing. Effluents containing dyes http://www.jese-online.org/ mailto:djamel_andalus@yahoo.fr J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 ELECTROCOAGULATION OF C.I. DISPERSE YELLOW 3 272 272 can be toxic to the environment [1-4]. In addition, their presence in aquatic systems, even at low concentrations, is very visible. It reduces the penetration of light and has a detrimental effect on photosynthesis [5-7]. Therefore, the remediation of water contaminated by these chemicals is necessary both to protect the environment and for future reuse [8-12]. Therefore, several biological, physical and chemical methods are used for the treatment of industrial effluents with different efficeincies [13- 15]. Electrochemical technologies, such as electrocoagulation technique (EC), seem to be well adapted to the textile industry wastewaters treatment [16-22]. This work is devoted to the study of the EC process for bleaching synthetic water containing an azo dye, C.I. disperse yellow 3 (DY), used in the Algerian textile industry and the assessment of its performance versus certain operating parameters. Experimental Experimental set-up The EC tests were performed using an experimental set-up shown in Figure 1. In a 1000 mL beaker, filled with 500 mL synthetic dye solution (distilled water + DY + NaCl), two Al (or Fe in some experiments) 4 × 20 cm electrodes were immersed (active surface S = 4 × 10.5 = 42 cm 2 ). The anode is connected to the positive pole and the cathode to the negative pole of the direct current power supply. The interelectrode distance is fixed at 2 cm. When the electric current is applied, the magnetic stirrer is started at an average velocity agitation. Figure 1. Photo of the EC experimental set-up. Electrodes cleaning Before experiments, the Fe electrodes were prepared to avoid the presence of any impurity as follows: (1) polishing with abrasive paper; (2) rinsing with distilled water; (3) degreasing by means of a solution composed of: NaOH (25 g), Na2CO3 (25 g), K2CO3 (25 g) and distilled water (q.s.p. 1,000 mL); (4) rinsing with distilled water; (5) pickling in a solution of sulphuric acid H2SO4 at 20 % for 20 min at room temperature; and again (6) rinsing with distilled water. For Al electrodes: (1) rinse with distilled water and polish using abrasive paper, (2) clean in hydrochloric acid solution (HCl at 20 %) during 10 min, and (4) rinse with distilled water. D. Ghernaout et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 doi: 10.5599/jese.2014.0065 273 Prepared solutions To prepare a solution of 200 mg L -1 dye, 0.2 g of the latter was poured into a 1 L flask and distilled water was added during stirring for better solubilisation. The initial pH was varied using a solution of 0.1 M HCl (acidic conditions) or NaOH (alkaline medium). The solution conductivity was increased by sodium chloride addition. All chemicals used were of analytical grade. Methods Once the EC test ends, the treated solutions were left to settle for 30 min in order to sediment the flocs formed. After decantation, and using a pipette, 25 mL of the solution were carefully collected for analysis. The analyses done before and after treatment were as follows: pH, conductivity and ultraviolet (UV) absorbance (Shimadzu 1601, dual beam with 1 cm quartz vessel). The best UV absorbance long wave was found at 346 nm (UV346). The DY removal was calculated using the relation (1): i f f / % 100 Ab Ab R Ab (1) where Abi and Abf were initial and final UV absorbances, respectively. All the tests were conducted at ambient temperature (20 °C). Results and discussion The aim of this work was to perform bleaching EC tests on dye synthetic solutions (distilled water+dye+NaCl) using EC process and evaluate its performance based on certain key parameters. Influencing parameters on EC process Common remarks During EC tests, some common observations were: - Aluminium dissolution according to Reaction (2): Al → Al 3+ + e - (2) - Production of H2 gas bubbles at the cathode according to Reaction (3): 2H2O + 2e - → 2OH - + H2(g) (3) - Production of O2 gas bubbles at the anode according to Reaction (4): 2H2O → 4H + + O2 + 4e - (4) - Flocs formation and their fixation on the H2(g) bubbles during their ascension to the solution surface as a white foam (Figure 2a and b). Indeed, anode dissolution generates coagulant species which destabilise the dye molecules forming flocs. Figure 2. Foam formation: (a) face view, (b) top view. (c) Initial and final state of a 200 mg L -1 DY solution treated by EC during 1 h: from wright to left, initial solution, treated solution at 12, 8 and 4 V, respectively. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 ELECTROCOAGULATION OF C.I. DISPERSE YELLOW 3 274 274 EC time The EC efficiency is strongly influenced by the time residence in the electrochemical device. To study its effect, the EC period was varied from 5 to 75 min and the other parameters were kept constant. The results obtained are illustrated in Figure 3. The H2 and O2 release and flocs formation increased over time and the foam became thicker. From 30 min, the flocs settled and the solution became clearer. As seen in Figure 3, the dye removal efficiency increased with electrolysis time until 45 min. After this time, EC performance decreased. Moreover, the good EC efficiencies were reached between 15 and 45 min. The removal efficiency was directly dependent upon the metal concentration in solution [23- 25]. The positive metallic species were produced by the Al anode neutralising the negative charges on the polluting molecules [26-30]. When the electrolysis duration was increased, the cationic species as well as metal hydroxide (Al(OH)3(s)) concentrations increased [30-32]. Consequently, the pollutant removal increased [33-36]. Figure 3. Dye removal as a function of EC time (pH 6.5; CNaCl = 1 g L -1 ; CDY = 20 mg L -1 ; d = 2 cm). Electric current density The electric current density is the most important parameter of the electrochemical process [37]. The electric current density effect on the dye removal was studied. The current intensities were 120, 250 and 350 mA corresponding to the applied voltages of 4, 8 and 12 V, respectively. The dye concentration was fixed at 20 and 200 mg/L. The other parameters were maintained constant (pH 6.5; CNaCl = 1 g/L; d = 2 cm). The obtained results are shown in Figure 4. For I = 120 mA (i = 29 A/m 2 ), the produced gas bubbles were small and the formed froth was thin. For I = 250 mA (i = 60 A/m 2 ), the gas emanation was medium and the formed froth became important. For I = 350 mA (i = 83 A/m 2 ), flocs settling became significant, the gas emanation became intense and the solution was transformed clear. As seen in Figure 4, the electric current had a great effect on the dye removal especially for the first ten minutes. After 20 min, the electric current had a small effect. This is explained by the fact that the negative charge on the organic dye is neutralised after the Al 3+ action on the dye molecules. D. Ghernaout et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 doi: 10.5599/jese.2014.0065 275 Figure 4. Effect of the electric current i on the EC efficiency for DY removal (pH 6.5, d = 2 cm, CNaCl = 1 g L -1 ) (a): CDY = 20 mg L -1 ; (b): CDY = 200 mg L -1 ; (c): CDY = 200 mg.L -1 ; tEC = 5 min Initial pH The solution pH is an important factor influencing the EC performance [37]. This is due to the fact that pH determinates the metallic ions speciation, the chemical state of other species in the J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 ELECTROCOAGULATION OF C.I. DISPERSE YELLOW 3 276 276 solution, and the formed products solubility. In order to examine the pH effect, the solution pH was adjusted to the values from 3 to 12 maintaining other parameters constant: U = 12 V (I = 83 A m -2 ), CNaCl = 1 g L -1 , d = 2 cm, tEC = 30 min). The obtained results are shown in Figure 5. Figure 5. Effect of the pH on the EC efficiency for DY removal (CDY = 200 mg L -1 , U = 12 V (i = 83 A m -2 ); tEC = 30 min; d = 2 cm). For the acidic medium, the solution colour became orange after the addition of HCl. From the cathode, there is an intense emanation of H2 bubbles. From the anode, there is an important formation of O2 bubbles. The foam and sediment formed are denser at the anode. For the alkaline medium, there was formation of white sediment at the bottom of the beaker, and its volume increased with time in comparison with the acidic medium. As seen in Figure 5, we noted that the dye removal was well performed between pH 3 and 10. Several researchers found that the best removal efficiency with aluminum electrodes was reached in the pH range between 3 and 9 [19,34-36]. In Figure 6, we chose four pH values: 3, 4, 6.5 and 10 with other parameters fixed in order to illustrate the pH effect. We also followed the change in pH as a function of time; Figure 7 shows the obtained results. The medium pH changed during the EC process. This change depended on the type of electrode material and the initial pH of the treated solution. We note from Figure 7 an increase in pH in the case of solutions with pH < 7. This increase was probably due to the release of H2 from the cathode and the formation of OH - according to the Reaction (3). Moreover, a decrease in pH in the case of solutions with pH > 7 was also noticed. This decrease was affected to the hydroxyl (OH - ) consumption according to Reaction (5): Al(OH)3(aq) + OH - (aq) → Al(OH)4 - (aq) (5) Initial conductivity Conductivity promotes the performance of electrochemical processes [26]. We chose NaCl as a supporting electrolyte. In order to determine its effect on the efficiency of bleaching of the synthetic solutions, we varied the concentration (0.25, 0.5, 1 and 1.5 g L -1 ) while keeping the other parameters constant. The results are shown in Figure 8. We have observed that (1) the gas production becomes higher with the increase in salt concentration, (2) the conductivity decreases during EC treatment and, (3) the formation of a small deposit on the anode. D. Ghernaout et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 doi: 10.5599/jese.2014.0065 277 Figure 6. DY removal as a function of pH (U = 12 V (i = 83 A m -2 ), tEC = 30 min; CNaCl = 1 g L -1 ; d = 2 cm (a) CDY = 20 mg L -1 ; (b) CDY = 40 mg L -1 ; (c) CDY = 200 mg L -1 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 ELECTROCOAGULATION OF C.I. DISPERSE YELLOW 3 278 278 Figure 9 shows the solution conductivity as a function of time during EC process. We note that the conductivity decreased over time and the difference in the changes in pH was different due to the HCl and NaOH added during the pH adjustment before EC treatment. Figure 7. Evolution of pH during EC treatment (same conditions as for Figure 6). (a) CDY = 20 mg L -1 ; (b) CDY = 40 mg L -1 ; (c) CDY = 200 mgL -1 Figure 8. Effect of the NaCl concentration on the EC efficiency U = 12 V (i = 83 A m -2 ); tEC = 30 min; d = 2 cm; CDY = 200 mg L -1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 20 40 60 80 p H tEC / min (a) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 20 40 60 80 p H tEC / min (b) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 20 40 60 80 p H tEC / min (c) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 R / % CNaCl / g L -1 D. Ghernaout et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 doi: 10.5599/jese.2014.0065 279 Figure 9. Solution conductivity as a function of time during EC process (CNaCl = 1 g L -1 ; CDY = 200 mg L -1 ; d = 2 cm; U = 12 V (i = 83 A -2 ) Inter-electrode distance We varied the distance between the electrodes d = 0.8; 1; 1.5 and 2 cm while fixing the other factors. The results are shown in Figure 10. When increasing the inter-electrode distance, the EC efficiency also increased. This can be explained as follows: for d = 2 cm, there would be more probabilities to generate global flocs that are able to adsorb more dye molecules. Figure 10. Effect of the inter-electrode distance on the EC performance (CNaCl = 1 g L -1 , CDY = 200 mg L -1 , pH = 6.5, U = 12 V (i = 83 A m -2 ). DY concentration The aim of this part is to determine whether the EC method was applicable to solutions with a range of concentrations from 20 to 500 mg L -1 . The solutions were electrolysed, for a treatment time of 45 min, at a fixed voltage U = 12 V (i = 83 A m -2 ) and an inter-electrode distance of 2 cm. The results obtained are shown in Fig. 11. Figure 11 shows that the EC method is effective in the range of selected concentrations. A yield of 97 % is reached at a dye concentration of 200 mg L -1 . The results obtained can be justified by J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 ELECTROCOAGULATION OF C.I. DISPERSE YELLOW 3 280 280 the increased probability of contact with the dye molecules to aluminum hydroxide Al(OH)3 to form flocs of large sizes; thereby facilitating their separation by their attachment to the bubbles of released gases at the electrodes. Figure 11. EC performance as a function of DY concentration CNaCl = 1 g L -1 ; pH 6.5; d = 2 cm, U = 12 V (i = 83 Am -2 ) EC using Fe electrodes To check if DY can be removed by EC using iron electrodes, some tests using the Al optimum conditions are performed. The results obtained are compared with those obtained with aluminum electrodes (Figure 12). Figure 12. EC using Al and Fe electrodes: CDY = 200 mg L -1 ; CNaCl = 1 g L -1 ; pH 6.5; d = 2 cm, U = 12 V (i = 83 A/m 2 ) During EC treatment using Fe electrodes, (1) clouds of green flocs came from the anode surface and settled to the beaker bottom and, (2) on the solution surface, two layers of foam were observed: the first a red-brown color, and below, the second green. We find that the rate of reduction of the dye increased with time until a yield of 96.28 % in the case of iron electrodes (Figure 12). Comparing the test results with aluminum electrodes (R = 98.96 %), we can say that iron is also effective in removing DY. 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 R / % CDY / mg L -1 D. Ghernaout et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 doi: 10.5599/jese.2014.0065 281 The reactions involved in the EC using iron electrodes are as follows: The iron, after oxidation in the electrolytic system, produces iron hydroxide Fe(OH)n(s), with n = 2 or 3; and two mechanisms have been proposed [6,12,14,15,24,38]: Mechanism 1 (green coloration, Fe(OH)2(s)): Fe(s) → Fe 2+ (aq) + 2e - (6) Fe 2+ (aq) + 2OH - (aq) → Fe(OH)2(s) (7) Mechanism 2 (brown coloration, Fe(OH)3(s)): Fe 2+ (aq) → Fe 3+ (aq) + 1e - (8) Fe 3+ (aq) + 3OH - (aq) → Fe(OH)3(s) (9) The species Fe(OH)n(s) formed (by the two mechanisms) remained in the aqueous phase in the form of gelatinous suspension which can then remove the pollutants from the water (Figure 13), either by complexation, or by electrostatic attraction, followed by coagulation and flotation or sedimentation [24,25,27,28]. Figure 13. Predominance-zone diagrams for (a) Fe(II) and (b) Fe(III) chemical species in aqueous solution. The straight lines represent the solubility equilibrium for insoluble Fe(OH)2 and Fe(OH)3, respectively, and the dotted lines represent the predominance limits between soluble chemical species. (c) Diagram of solubility of Al(III) species as a function of pH [27,28]. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 ELECTROCOAGULATION OF C.I. DISPERSE YELLOW 3 282 282 Conclusions Highly performant EC process is shown in dye removal during 45 min for 200 mg/L dye concentration at i = 350 A/m 2 (applied voltage 12 V) and CNaCl = 1 g/L reaching 98 % for pH 3 and 10 and 99 % for pH 6. For 10 min, DY is also efficiently removed (86 %) showing that EC process may be well convenient for textile industry wastewater treatment. EC using Fe electrodes is slightly less performant than EC using Al electrodes. Acknowledgements: The present research work was undertaken by the Binladin Research Chair on Quality and Productivity Improvement in the Construction Industry funded by the Saudi Binladin Constructions Group; this is gratefully acknowledged. The opinions and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organisation. References [1] A. R. Amani-Ghadim, S. Aber, A. Olad, H. Ashassi-Sorkhabi, Chemical Engineering and Processing 64 (2013) 68-78. [2] W. Lemlikchi, S. Khaldi, M.O. Mecherri, H. Lounici, N. Drouiche, Separation Science and Technology 47 (2012) 1682-1688. [3] M. S. Secula, B. Cagnon, T. F. de Oliveira, O. Chedeville, H. Fauduet, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 43 (2012) 767-775. [4] B. Merzouk, B. Gourich, K. Madani, Ch. Vial, A. Sekki, Desalination 272 (2011) 246-253. [5] M. Kobya, E. Demirbas, O. T. Can, M. Bayramoglu, Journal of Hazardous Materials B132 (2006) 183-188. [6] A. Aleboyeh, N. Daneshvar, M. B. Kasiri, Chemical Engineering and Processing 47 (2008) 827-832. [7] S. Zodi, B. Merzouk, O. Potier, F. Lapicque, J.-P. Leclerc, Separation and Purification Technology 108 (2013) 215-222. [8] M. Eyvaz, M. Kirlaroglu, T. S. Aktas, E. Yuksel, Chemical Engineering Journal 153 (2009) 16- 22. [9] E. Pajootan, M. Arami, N. M. Mahmoodi, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 43 (2012) 282-290. [10] M.-C. Wei, K.-S. Wang, C.-L. Huang, C.-W. Chiang, T.-J. Chang, S.-S. Lee, S.-H. Chang, Chemical Engineering Journal 192 (2012) 37-44. [11] C. Phalakornkule, P. Sukkasem, C. Mutchimsattha, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010) 10934-10943. [12] M. Chafi, B. Gourich, A. H. Essadki, C. Vial, A. Fabregat, Desalination 281 (2011) 285-292. [13] P. Cañizares, F. Martínez, M.A. Rodrigo, C. Jiménez, C. Sáez, J. Lobato, Separation and Purification Technology 60 (2008) 147-154. [14] C. Gong, Z. Zhang, H. Li, D. Li, B. Wu,Y. Sun, Y. Cheng, Journal of Hazardous Materials 274 (2014) 465-472. [15] J. Llanos, S. Cotillas, P. Cañizares, M.A. Rodrigo, Water Research 53 (2014) 329-338. [16] S. Pulkka, M. Martikainen, A. Bhatnagar, M. Sillanpää, Separation and Purification Technology 132 (2014) 252-271. [17] E-S. Z. El-Ashtoukhy, N.K. Amin, Journal of Hazardous Materials 179 (2010) 113-119. [18] A. K. Golder, N. Hridaya, A. N. Samanta, S. Ray, Journal of Hazardous Materials B127 (2005) 134-140. [19] S. Aoudj, A. Khelifa, N. Drouiche, M. Hecini, H. Hamitouche, Chemical Engineering and Processing 49 (2010) 1176-1182. [20] Y. Ş Yildiz, Journal of Hazardous Materials 153 (2008) 194-200. D. Ghernaout et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 4(4) (2014) 271-283 doi: 10.5599/jese.2014.0065 283 [21] C.-L. Yang, J. McGarrahan, Journal of Hazardous Materials B127 (2005) 40-47. [22] J. G. Ibanez, M. M. Singh, Z. Szafran, Journal of Chemical Education 75 (1998) 1040-1041. [23] D. Ghernaout, S. Irki, A. Boucherit, Desalination and Water Treatment 52 (2014) 3256-3270. [24] D. Ghernaout, Desalination and Water Treatment 51 (2013) 7536-7554. [25] D. Ghernaout, M. W. Naceur, B. Ghernaout, Desalination and Water Treatment 28 (2011) 287-320. [26] D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, Desalination and Water Treatment 27 (2011) 243-254. [27] D. Ghernaout, M.W. Naceur, A. Aouabed, Desalination 270 (2011) 9-22. [28] C. A. Martínez-Huitle, E. Brillas, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 87 (2009) 105-145. [29] D. Ghernaout, A. Mariche, B. Ghernaout, A. Kellil, Desalination and Water Treatment 22 (2010) 311-329. [30] A. Saiba, S. Kourdali, B. Ghernaout, D. Ghernaout, Desalination and Water Treatment 16 (2010) 201-217. [31] D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, Desalination and Water Treatment 16 (2010) 156-175. [32] D. Belhout, D. Ghernaout, S. Djezzar-Douakh, A. Kellil, Desalination and Water Treatment 16 (2010) 1-9. [33] D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, A. Boucherit, M.W. Naceur, A. Khelifa, A. Kellil, Desalination and Water Treatment 8 (2009) 91-99. [34] D. Ghernaout, A. Badis, A. Kellil, B. Ghernaout, Desalination 219 (2008) 118-125. [35] D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, A. Saiba, A. Boucherit, A. Kellil, Desalination 239 (2009) 295- 308. [36] D. Ghernaout, B. Ghernaout, A. Boucherit, Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology 29 (2008) 1272-1275. [37] M. Muthukumar, M. Govindaraj, A. Muthusamy, G. Bhaskar Raju, Separation Science and Technology 46 (2011) 272-282. [38] C. Barrera-Díaz, B. Bilyeu, G. Roa, L. Bernal-Martinez, Separation and Purification Reviews 40 (2011) 1-24. © 2014 by the authors; licensee IAPC, Zagreb, Croatia. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/