New potentiometric electrode based on ion pair complex for determination of tropicamide in pure and pharmaceutical formulations doi:10.5599/jese.321 277 J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 6(4) (2016) 277-286; doi: 10.5599/jese.321 Open Access : : ISSN 1847-9286 www.jESE-online.org Original scientific paper New potentiometric electrode based on ion pair complex for determination of tropicamide in pure and pharmaceutical formulations Mouhammed Khateeb, Basheer Elias*, Hazar Alksair* Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Al- Baath, Homs, Syria *Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Al- Baath Homs, Syria Corresponding author: drkhateeb2010@gmail.com, mkhateeb74@hotmail.com Received: June 20, 2016; Revised: October 2, 2016; Accepted: October 10, 2016 Abstract Construction and general performance of a novel modified carbon paste electrode (MCPE) for determination of tropicamide (TPC) in pure form and pharmaceutical formulations have been examined. Tropicamide-tetraphenylborate (TPC–TPB) ion pair has been prepa- red and used as electroactive material. The best MCPE electrode was composed of 7 % ion-pair, 46.5 % dioctylphthalat and 46.5 % graphite powder. The electrode shows stable potentiometric response for TPC in the concentration range 0.3–221.0 µM at 25 °C and pH range of 2.0–8.0. The electrode exhibits near Nernstian slope of 59.71±0.30 mV/decade and lower limit of detection of 0.09 µM with fast response time (less than 15 s). The selectivity of the electrode (TPC–TPB) was investigated with respect to some organic and inorganic cations. The MCPE was designed to have better mechanical resistance. The proposed method was successfully applied for determination of TPC in eye drop formulation. Keywords Tropicamide; Sodium tetraphenylborate; Ion pair complex; Carbon paste electrode; Pharmaceutical formulations Introduction Tropicamide (TPC), (R,S)-N-ethyl-3-hydroxy-2-phenyl-N-(pyrid-4-yl-methyl) propionamide (Fig. 1), is an antimuscarinic agent with short duration of mydriatic and cycloplegic effect. TPC is used for refractive examinations and preservative for optimal eye tolerance and activity [1]. The action of TPC is more rapid in onset and wears off more rapidly than most other mydriatics and its use is generally much the same as those described for other mydriatics [2,3]. http://www.jese-online.org/ mailto:drkhateeb2010@gmail.com mailto:mkhateeb74@hotmail.com J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 6(4) (2016) 277-286 DETERMINATION OF TROPICAMIDE 278 Several methods have been reported for determination of TPC including spectrophotome try [4–8], high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [9–12] and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) [13]. In the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) [14] and British Pharmaco- poeia (BP) [15] the non-aqueous titration method for determination of TPC in raw materials and the extractive spectrophotometric method for pharmaceutical preparations have been described, respectively. In the literature survey, no potentiometric method has been reported yet for determination of TPC. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to develop an accurate and validated potentiometric method for determination of TPC in raw material and pharmaceutical dosage forms, that can also be used in quality control laboratories. Since their innovation by Adams [16], carbon paste electrodes (CPEs) have widely been used in many fields such as voltammetry, amperometry and potentiometry [17]. In comparison with ion- selective electrodes based on polymeric membranes, chemically modified carbon paste electrodes (CMCPEs) possess some advantages. In addition to lower limits of detection with respect to electrodes with an internal reference solution, CMCPEs are ease for preparation and regeneration, have stable response and very low ohmic resistance [18]. N N OH O Figure 1. Chemical structure of tropicamide. Experimental Reagents and chemicals All chemicals used were of analytical grade. Double distilled water was used throughout all experiments. Working reference standard of tropicamide (TPC C17H20N2O2, 284.35 g/mole) was obtained from Kunshan Chemical and Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (India). Its purity was found to be 99.5 % according to the compendial testing method. Pharmaceutical preparation Mydriamed eye drop was provided by Medico Company for Pharmaceutical Industries (Homs, Syria). Sodium tetraphenylborate (Na–TPB) was from Merck, while dibutyl phthalate (DBP), dioctyl phthalate (DOP) and paraffin oil (p.Oil) were from BDH. Graphite powder was obtained from Aldrich. Apparatus All potentiometric measurements were made at 25±1 °C using a Sanwal potentiometer (pH meter, Ion meter model of DT9201A) with combined pH electrode (model 250A, Orion, USA) for pH measurements. Saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was used as the reference electrode. The electrochemical cell is represented as follows: Hg, Hg2Cl2(s), KCl (sat.)║sample solution │carbon paste electrode│Cu Standard solution Standard stock solution of 1.0×10-2 M TPC was prepared daily by dissolving the appropriate amo- unt of drug in double distilled water. Standard working solutions 1.0×10-3 and 1.0×10-4 M were freshly prepared by suitable dilutions of the stock solution with double distilled water. M. Khateeb et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 6(4) (2016) 277-2860 doi:10.5599/jese.321 279 Calibration graph Different amounts of 1.0×10-4 or 1.0×10-3 M TPC were added to 50mL of double distilled water to achieve the concentration range from 0.3 to 221.0 µM. The measured potential was recorded. The calibration graph was constructed by plotting the potential value versus pCTPC (–logarithm concentration of TPC). The amount of drug was obtained from the regression equation. Analysis of eye drop 0.1 mL of the commercial eye drop was transferred into a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluted with double distilled water. The general procedure was then followed in the concentration range mentioned above. Preparation of tropicamide-tetraphenylborate (TPC–TPB) ion-pair Sensing element used in the carbon paste electrode is the ion-pair compound made by interaction of TPC and Na–TPB. It was prepared by mixing 20 mL of 0.01 M acidic solution of TPC with 20 mL aqueous solution of 0.01 M Na–TPB. The resulting solution was then filtered, the precipitate washed with double distilled water and dried at room temperature [19]. Modified carbon paste electrodes (MCPEs) MCPEs were prepared by thoroughly mixing various amounts of ion pairing agents with carbon powder and plasticizer in the mortar, until homogenization of this mixture was achieved. The resulting paste was then packed firmly into the hole of the electrode body. Electrical contact to the carbon paste was made with a copper wire. Fresh surface was obtained by applying manual pressure to the carbon paste and polished on a filter paper to a shiny surface (Fig.2). Figure 2. Schematic illustration of electrochemical cell with MCPE as an indicator electrode (IE) and SCE as reference electrode (RE). Selectivity of the electrode Potentiometric selectivity coefficient was evaluated using the matched potential method (MPM) [20]. According to the MPM, the activity of the analyte was increased from A = 9.90×10-5 M (reference solution) to’A =1.01×10-4 M and the corresponding change in potential (ΔE) is measured. Then, 1.00×10-1 M solution of an interfering ion was added to a new 9.90×10-5 M analyte reference solution, until the same ΔE is recorded, determining thus the concentration of the added amount, B. The selectivity coefficient 𝐾A,B MPM for each interfering ion was calculated using the following equation: J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 6(4) (2016) 277-286 DETERMINATION OF TROPICAMIDE 280 MPM A B A , A B ' K      Results and discussion Calibration graph and effect of ion pair (IP) percentage on electrode potential It is known that sensitivity and linearity of an electrode depend significantly on the amount of the ion–pair (IP) in the carbon paste composition. Thus, influence of the TPC–TPB IP percentage in the carbon paste composition was investigated first. Preliminary experiment showed that carbon paste electrode without IP modifier has no response towards the analyte. For this purpose, ten electrodes were prepared containing the IP modifier percentage from 1 to 10 % and the results are summarized in Fig. 3 and Table 1. Increase of IP percentage in the paste is found to increase the electrode response and stability of potentiometric readings, as well as slopes (S) of linear parts of calibration graphs defined by equation E = f(pCTPC), reaching S = 59.714 mV dec-1 at 7 % TPC–TPB (Fig. 4). At percentages above 7 %, a decrease of slope and reduction of linearity range where E = f(pCTPC) of the MCPE electrode are observed due to the kinetics of IP within the paste. Figure 3. Effect of IP percentage in the MCPE on the calibration graph of TPC Figure 4. Effect of IP percentage in MCPE on the slope (S) of the linear, E =f(pCTPC), range of the calibration graph of TPC. -50 0 50 100 150 200 2345678 E / m V pCTPC 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 2 4 6 8 10 S / m V d e c- 1 IP, % M. Khateeb et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 6(4) (2016) 277-2860 doi:10.5599/jese.321 281 Table 1. Potentiometric data for MCPE with different IP percentage obtained from linear equations. r Linear range, µM Intercept S / mV dec-1 Composition, % IP Plasticizer Graphite 0.9873 9.27-64.70 105.17 22.77 1 49.5 49.5 0.9810 1.25-33.40 136.41 25.83 2 49.0 49.0 0.9942 1.25-64.70 190.24 32.53 3 48.5 48.5 0.9868 0.62-64.70 215.31 38.43 4 48.0 48.0 0.9906 0.62-122.00 268.98 45.73 5 47.5 47.5 0.9912 0.62-64.70 366.42 55.53 6 47.0 47.0 0.9995 0.30-221.00 409.40 59.71 7 46.5 46.5 0.9904 1.25-64.70 344.94 53.49 8 46.0 46.0 0.9922 0.62-64.70 354.48 51.17 9 45.5 45.5 0.9971 0.62-33.40 286.89 46.22 10 45.0 45.0 Response characteristics and statistical data The characteristics performance of the best electrode (shadowed in blue in Table 1) was deter- mined and the results are summarized in Table 2. The best proposed MCPE electrode shows nearly Nernstian response over the concentration range 0.3-221.0 μM. Table 2. Response characteristics of the best MCPE-TPC electrode. Parameter TPC-TPB electrode IP, % 7 Regression equation E = -59.7pCTPC + 409.40 Correlation coefficient (r) 0.9995 Linear range, μM 0.3–221.0 LOD, μM 0.09 LOQ, μM 0.300 Response time, sec ≤15 Life time, day 70 Working pH range 2.0–8.0 The slope of calibration graph for the best MCPE is 59.7 mV/decade for TPC concentrations in the range of 0.3–221.0 µM, with standard deviation of ±0.3 mV after five replicate measurements. Limit of detection (LOD) was calculated from the intersection of two extrapolated segments of the calibration graph [21]. LOD and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.09 and 0.3 µM, respectively. Effect of plasticizer on the potential response In this study, three plasticizers, di-octylphthalate (DOP), di-butylphthalate (DBP) and paraffin oil (p. Oil) were used to examine possible optimization of the paste. Contents of examined plasticizers were 46.5, 46.0 and 45.0 w %, contents of graphite powder were 46.5, 46.0 and 45.0 w % and contents of electroactive compound (TPC–TPB IP) were 7, 8 and 10 w %, respectively. The sum of percentages of all three components was always adjusted to 100 %. The results obtained showed that response performances of prepared pastes are rather different, depending on the kind of plasticizer, proportion of the plasticizer towards graphite and amount of electroactive compound (Table 3). Typical potential responses of electrodes constructed with three plasticizers are given in Fig.5. As shown in Fig. 5, the DOP-graphite electrodes were superior to DBP-graphite and p.Oil- graphite electrodes in both the response slope and linear concentration range. So, DOP was selected as the plasticizer of the carbon paste. The best paste composition of the DOP-graphite electrode was 46.5 % graphite, 46.5 % DOP and 7 % IP. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 6(4) (2016) 277-286 DETERMINATION OF TROPICAMIDE 282 Table 3. General characteristic of different plasticizers of MCPE-TPC electrode. Composition of the plasticizer, % IP, % S / mV dec-1 Linear range, µM LOD, μM Response time, s DOP (46.5) 7 59.71 0.30 – 221.00 0.09 15 DBP (46.0) 8 52.18 0.62 – 64.70 0.31 20 p. Oil (45.0) 10 44.88 2.48 – 122.00 0.89 30 Figure 5. Optimization of plasticizers with CPE compositions:(a) DOP 46.5 %, graphite 46.5 %, IP 7.0 %, (b) DBP 46.0%, Graphite 46.0 %, IP 8.0 %), (c) p. Oil 45.0 %, graphite 45.0, IP 10.0 %. Dynamic response time Dynamic response time is the required time for the electrode to achieve values within ±1 mV of the final equilibrium potential after successive immersions in the sample solutions [22]. Its calculation involved the variation and the recording of the TPC concentration in a series of solutions from 0.5 to 50.0 µM. The electrode was able to quickly reach its equilibrium response in the whole concentration range. This time for the MCPE was about 15 seconds in the concentrated solutions ≤221.00 μM (Fig 6). Figure 6. Response time of MCPE for different concentrations of TPC. Selectivity of the electrode Influence of various basic substances on the response of MCPE-TPC electrode was investigated by measuring the potentiometric interference from different kinds of sugars, inorganic cations and certain alkaloids. Selectivity coefficients were evaluated by the matched potential method (MPM). Table 4 showed that the proposed MCPE is highly selective towards TPC. The electrode showed no response to a number of potentially interfering ions usually used in the manufacturing of pharmaceutical preparations, such as starch and lactose. The inorganic cations did not interfere due to differences in their mobilities and permiabilities as compared with TPC cation. -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 2345678 E / m V pCTPC E(DOPH) E(DBPH) E(P. Oil) a b c 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 0 20 40 60 80 E / m V t / sec 50.0 µM 5.0 0.5 µM M. Khateeb et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 6(4) (2016) 277-2860 doi:10.5599/jese.321 283 Table 4. Selectivity coefficients of some interfering ions Interfering ion Log KMPM Interfering ion Log KMPM Na+ -3.51 Ba2+ -2.51 K+ -3.38 Fructose - Ca2+ -2.97 Glucose - Mg2+ -3.60 Sucrose - NH4+ -2.43 Maltose - Mn2+ -2.71 Lactose - Zn2+ -2.43 Starch - Effect of pH To examine the effect of pH on the MCPE-TPC electrode response, the potential was measured at specific concentration of the TPC solution (50.0, 5.0 and 0.5 µM) having pH value of 1.0 up to 14.0 (concentrated NaOH or HCl solutions were employed for pH adjustments). The results showed that the potential remained constant despite pH change in the range of 2.0-8.0, indicating applicability of this electrode in the specified pH range (Fig. 7). Relatively prominent fluctuations in the potential vs. pH behavior took place below and above the formerly stated pH limits. In detail, the fluctuations above the pH value of 8.0 might be justified by removing the positive charge on the drug molecule. Fluctuations below the pH value of 2.0 may be due to interference of hydronium ion. Figure 7. The pH effect on potential response of the MCPE-TPC electrode. Effect of temperature To investigate thermal stability of the electrode, the effect of temperature of TPC solution on the MCPE was studied at different temperature values (20-70 °C). The MCPE exhibited good Nernstian behavior in the temperature range of (20-60 °C). The standard cell potentials (Eocell) were determined at different temperatures and used to determine the isothermal temperature coefficient (dE°/dt) of the cell with the aid of the following equation [23]: E°cell = E°cell,25 °C + (dE°/dt)cell t Plotting t vs. E°cell,25ºC produced the straight line (Fig. 8). The slope of this line was taken as the isothermal coefficient of the cell which was found to be -1.96×10-3 V/°C. The values of isothermal coefficient of the electrode revealed relatively high thermal stability within the investigated temperature range. -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 E / m V pH 50.0 µM 5.0 µM 0.5 µM J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 6(4) (2016) 277-286 DETERMINATION OF TROPICAMIDE 284 Figure 8. Variation of the E°cell with temperature for the MCPE-TPC electrode. Potentiometric titration Representative titration curve for determination of the investigated drug is shown in Fig.9. This MCPE electrode can be used successfully as indicator electrode in potentiometric titrations of the investigated drug. It also indicates that 1:1 [TPC]:[TPB] is formed as seen from the curve. Figure 9. Typical potentiometric titration of 50 mL of 1×10-4M TPC with 1×10-2 M TPB using MCPE Life-time study The MCPE electrode life time was estimated with the calibration graph, periodical tests with standard solutions (0.30-221.0 µM) and calculation of its response slope. For this estimation, the electrode was employed extensively (1 hour per day) for 80 days. As it can be seen from Table 5, in the case of MCPE this time is 70 days which shows the long-term stability of this kind of electrode. In MCPEs the surface of the electrode is renewable and can be used for longer time. Table 5. Life time of MCPE electrode Time, day S / mV dec-1 Linear range, µM Time, day S / mV dec-1 Linear range, µM 1 / 24 59.71 0.30-221.00 45 59.65 0.30-122.00 1 59.35 0.30-221.00 50 60.02 0.62-122.00 2 59.50 0.30-221.00 55 59.22 0.62-122.00 5 59.96 0.30-221.00 60 59.11 0.62-221.00 10 59.60 0.30-221.00 65 59.09 0.30-122.00 15 59.41 0.30-221.00 70 58.65 1.25-122.00 20 59.75 0.30-221.00 75 58.31 1.25-122.00 25 59.18 0.30-221.00 80 57.76 2.48-64.70 30 59.15 0.30-221.00 35 59.31 0.30-221.00 40 59.55 0.30-221.00 E°cell = -0.1959t + 413.46 r = 0.9894 400 402 404 406 408 410 0 20 40 60 80 E ° c e ll / m V t / °C 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 E / m V VTPB / mL M. Khateeb et al. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 6(4) (2016) 277-2860 doi:10.5599/jese.321 285 Accuracy and precision The precision and accuracy of the method were also evaluated. The standard deviation, relative standard deviation and recovery of different TPC amounts were determined and recorded in Table 6. The accuracy of the method is indicated by excellent recovery (99.80-101.40 %) and precision is supported by low standard deviation. Table 6. Accuracy and precision for determination of TPC in pure form by the proposed method. CTPC, µM RSD, % Recovery, % Taken Found ± SD* 0.5 0.499±0.01 2.00 99.80 5.0 5.07±0.08 1.58 101.40 50.0 50.10±0.58 1.16 100.20 100.0 99.80±0.82 0.82 99.80 *Average of five replicates Analytical application The application of the proposed method using calibration graph gives good results as shown in Table 7. The results were compared with the official method [14] and shown that the MCPE has good efficiency as regard of sensitivity, index of retrieving and repetition. Table 7. Determination of TPC in eye drop by here proposed and official methods. Formulation Label claim Recovery, % ± SDa Proposed method Official method [14] Mydriamed 0.5 % 5 mg/mL 99.60±0.10 tb= 0.45 Fc=1.23 99.80±0.09 tb=0.25 1.0 % 10 mg/mL 100.90±0.11 tb=1.83 Fc=1.21 100.60±0.10 tb=1.34 a Average of five replicates; b Tabulated t-value at 95 % confidence level is 2.776. c Tabulated F-value at 95 % confidence level is 6.26 Conclusion The proposed chemically modified carbon paste electrode (MCPE) demonstrated advanced performance with fast response time and long stability, and shows high sensitivity, reasonable selectivity, and applicability over wide concentration range without sample pretreatment. The proposed procedure can be used for the routine analysis of TPC in bulk and eye drop. The sample recoveries from all samples were in good agreement with their respective label claims. References [1] J. G. Hardman, L. E. Limbird, P. B. Molinoff, R. W. Ruddon, The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics Goodman and Gilman's, 9th edition, Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 1996, 156-7, 1635. [2] J. G. Hardman, A. Goodman Gilman, L. E. Limbird, The pharmacological pasis of therapeutics, 10th ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 2001, 1673-85. [3] J. N. Delgabo, W. A. Remers, (editors.), Wilson and Gisvold's textbook of organic medicinal and pharmaceutical chemistry. 10th ed. New York: Lippincott-Raven Publ., 2004, 585. [4] Z. A. Shoaibi, A. A. Gouda, Journal of Young Pharmacists 4 (2012) 42-48. [5] A. Massoud, S. Effat, I. Shiva, F. Hassan, Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 3(1) (2007) 43-50. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 6(4) (2016) 277-286 DETERMINATION OF TROPICAMIDE 286 [6] S. Effat, A. Massoud, S. H. Shiva, B. Mitra, Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 6(3) (2010) 171-178. [7] S. Swati, R. C. Mashru, Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society 55(4) (2010) 43-50. [8] N. Y. Hasan, M. A. Elkway, B. E. Elzeany, N. E. Wagieh, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 28 (2002) 87-97. [9] M. J. Galmier, A. M. Frasey, S. Meski, E. Beyssac, J. Petit, J. M. Aiache, C. Lartigue, Biomedical Chromatography 14(3) (2000) 202–204. [10] M. Amanlou, G. Asmardi, P. C. Andalibi, N. Javadi, F. Khodadady, Z. B. Omarny, Journal of Chromatogaphy 1(2) (2005) 136-139. [11] B. P. Harshit, C. H. Payal, D. P. Bhavesh, K. S. Samir, International Journal of Institutional Pharmacy and Life Sciences 4(5) (2014) 20-27. [12] M. Jovovic, N. Kostic, B. Janc, J. Stojanovic and A. Malenovic, Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies 35 (2012) 231–239. [13] Z. Türkmen, M. Selda, S. Bağdadi, S. Cengiz, Nobel Medicus 33 (2015) 50-54. [14] United States Pharmacoepia 29. Rockville: United States Pharmacoepial Convention, 2005, 295, 2223. [15] British Pharmacopoeia. London: Her Majesty's, Stationery Office, 2005, 2028. [16] R. N. Adams, Analytical. Chemistry 30 (1958) 1576. [17] I. Svancara, K. Vytras, K. Kalcher, A. Walcarius, J. Wang, Electroanalysis 21 (2009)7. [18] K. Kalcher, J.M. Kauffmann, J. Wang, I. Svancara, K. Vytras, C. Neuhold and Z. Yang, Electroanalysis 7 (1995) 5. [19] M. R. Ganjali, S. Aghili, M. P. Hamedani, P. Norouzi, International Journal of Electrochemical Science 7 (2012) 10394–10403. [20] Y. Umezawa, P. Bühlmann, K. Umezawa, K. Tohda, S. Amemiya, Pure and Applied Chemistry 72 (10) (2000) 1851-2082. [21] L. Meites, P. Zuman, H.W. Nurnberg, Recommended terms, Pure and Applied Chemistry 57 (10) (1985) 1491-1505. [22] P. L. Baily, M. Riley, Analyst (London) 100 (1188) (1975) 145-156. [23] A. J. Debethune, T. S. Licht, N. Swendeman, Journal of Electrochemical Society 106 (1959) 616-625. [24] N. L. Teradal, S. N. Prashanth, J. Seetharamappa, J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 2 (2012) 67-75. 2016 by the authors; licensee IAPC, Zagreb, Croatia. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/