5735

Work Participation in Cultural Operations of Rice Farming by Tribal 
and Non-Tribal labourers in Wayanad district :  

A Comparative Analysis

P.M. vishnu Narayanan1 and A. Anilkumar2

ABSTRACT

 Rice is a traditional staple food crop of India, having high cultural and ecological 
significance in the present global scenario. Tribal labourers in Wayanad district of Kerala 
had been the traditional labourers in rice farming.  The consequent migration of non-tribals 
to Wayanad district of Kerala had been changed the demographic and cultural entity 
of the district.  The present study was conducted in Wayanad district to compare the 
work participation between tribal and non- tribal labourers. Twenty tribal and non-tribal 
labourers were selected from each selected panchayats and a total of one hundred and 
twenty respondents were included in the study. A well-structured interview schedule was 
used for collecting the data from the respondents. The data were tabulated and inferences 
were drawn after appropriate statistical analysis.  The results show that majority of the 
tribal labourers had high work participation than non-tribals. While comparing based on 
gender, female labourers had high work participation than male labourers both in the 
case of tribal and non-tribal labourers.

Keywords : Rice farming,Work participation, Tribal labourers, Wayanad.

1-Meladath House, Valiparambu, Puthoor, Kottakkal, Malappur District, Kerala - 676 503 and 2. Dean, Kerala 
Agricultural University, Vellayani - 695 522 , Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

Received : 07-09-2016; Accepted : 13-01-2017

INTRODUCTION

 Wayanad was traditionally one 
of the important rice growing districts 
of Kerala.  Consequent to increase in 
population as a result of migration from 
north Malabar and central Travancore, 
cropping pattern in the district had 
changed in favour of cash crops and 
other plantations.  Wayanad is the 
district having highest concentration of 

tribespeople in Kerala (GOI, 2011).  These 
tribespeople were traditional labourers in 
rice farming since time immemorial.  

 Most of the rice farmers prefer 
tribal labourers to work in their fields, 
as they are experts in indigenous 
agricultural practices and possess 
rich experience in various aspects of 
cultivation.  As population increased in 
the district due to migration, non-tribal 

Journal of Extension Education
Vol. 28  No. 4,  2016
DOI:https://doi.org/10.26725/JEE.2016.4.28.5735-5739



5736

people also stared working as labourers. 
Comparative analysis of tribal and non-
tribal labourers will help us to know the 
details of work participation in different 
operations of rice farming and other 
social dynamics. 

METHODOlOGy

 The study was carried out in 
the Wayanad district of Kerala state in 
India. Wayanad district was purposively 
selected for the study, since this district 
has the  highest concentration of 
tribespeople.  Mananthavady, Sulthan 
Bathery and Vythiri are the three 
taluks in Wayanad district.  From each 
taluk, one panchayat having highest 
population was purposively selected for 

the study. From each selected panchayat 
one padashekharam with highest area 
was selected.  From each selected 
padashekharam twenty tribal labourers 
and twenty non-tribal labourers 
were selected, at random. Thus, 120 
respondents formed the sample of study.  
Data were collected using a pre-tested 
interview schedule and the statistical 
analysis used included in this study 
were percentage analysis and Krushkal 
– Wallis test.  Work participation was 
studied on three dimensions viz., extent 
of participation in different operations of 
rice farming, work participation based 
on performance and work participation 
based on gender.

Table 1. 
Extent of Work Participation in Different Operations of Rice Farming.

        (n=120)

Sl.No. Operations
Tribal labourers

(n=60)
Non-tribal labourers

(n=60)
No. % No. %

1. Land preparation 56 93 54 90

2. Nursery management 54 90 58 96

3. Transplantation 42 70 24 40

4.
Intercultural 
Operations

49 81 48 80

5. Water management 37 61 35 58

6. Harvesting 55 91 48 80

7. Postharvest
Management

42 70 40 66

Journal of Extension Education



5737

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
 From  Table 1, it can be understood 
that the tribal labourers’ participation in 
various operations of rice farming was 
higher, especially in land preparation 
(93 per cent), nursery management (90 
per cent), transplantation (70 per cent)), 
intercultural operations (81 per cent), 

Table 2.     
Work Participation Based on Performance

        (n=120)

Sl.

No.
Category Score Range

Tribal  
labourers 

(n=60)

Non -Tribal 
labourers (n=60)

No. % No. %
1. Low 17 to 21 17 28 26 43
2. High 21-35 43 72 34 57
3. Average score 21.66(88.31) 21 (74.9)

harvesting (91 per cent), and postharvest 
management (70 per cent).  

 On the other hand, the non-tribal 
labourers had a higher participation in 
operations such as land preparation (90 
per cent), nursery management (96 per 
cent), intercultural operations (80 per 
cent), and harvesting (80 per cent).

Kruskal Wallis      =  14.956  (p= 0.0006 )

CD( .05) for 60,60 =   18.989 

(CD- critical difference)

Work participation based on 
performance
 A perusal of the table reveals 
that majority (72 per cent) of the tribal 
labourers had high work participation 
and only 28 per cent of them had low 
work participation.  The non-tribal 
labourers showed similar kind of work 
participation. 

 Kruskal – Wallis test was done to 
analyse the significant difference between 
work participation based on performance 

by tribal and non-tribal labourers. 

 By comparing the average scores 
of work participation it can be seen that 
there is no significant difference between 
the average score of work participation 
based on performance between tribal 
and non-tribal labourers. 

 Tribal labourers showed a higher 
level of work participation compared to 
non-tribal labourers.  This result was 
in line with the findings of Goswami 
et al. (2006).Tribal labourers were the 
traditional workers in the rice tracts of 
Wayanad.  They were familiar with all 
the operations in rice farming. Therefore, 
it can be inferred that work participation 

Work Participation in Cultural Operations of Rice Farming by Tribal and Non-Tribal Labourers in Wayanad district :  
A Comparative Analysis



5738

was more among tribal population than 
the non-tribal population.  

 High preference of tribal labourers 
than non-tribal labourers by farmers, 

might be because of their rich experience 
in rice farming possessed by them 
and they are possibly  less assertive in 
demanding higher wages. 

Table3. 
Work Participation Based on Gender

Sl. 
No.

Operations

Tribal labourers 
(n=60)

     Non-tribal labourers 
(n=60)

Male 
(n=30)

Female 
(n=30)

Male 
(n=30) 

Female

No. % No. % No. % (n=30) %

1. Land preparation 30 100 26 86 29 97 25 83

2. Nursery 
management

26 89 27 90 28 93 30 100

3. Transplantation 12 40 30 100 9 30 15 50

4. Intercultural 
Operations

22 73 27 90 22 73 26 87

5. Water 
management

22 73 15 50 20 67 15 50

6. Harvesting 27 90 28 93 20 67 28 93

7. Postharvest

management
18 60 24 80 15 50 25 83

Work Participation Based on Gender 

 Upon scrutinizing Table 3, it can 
be understood that land preparation 
(100 per cent), harvesting (90 per cent) 
and nursery management (89 per cent) 
are the important operations done by 
the male tribal labourers. Whereas 

transplantation (100 percent), harvesting 
(93 per cent), nursery management (90 
per cent), intercultural operations (90 per 
cent), land preparation (86 per cent) and 
postharvest management (80 per cent) 
are the important operations carried out 
by the female tribal labourers.

Journal of Extension Education



5739

  In case of non-tribal labourers, 
land preparation (97 per cent) and 
nursery management (93 per cent) are 
the important operations performed 
by male non-tribal labourers. Whereas 
land preparation (83 percent), nursery 
management (100 percent), intercultural 
operations (87 per cent), harvesting (93 
per cent) and post harvest management 
(83 per cent) are the important operations 
done by the female non-tribal labourers.

 From Table 3, it could be inferred 
that tribal labourers had higher work 
participation compared to non-tribal 
labourers, in the case of both male and 
female.  The female labourers had more 
work participation compared to the male 
labourers. This result is in line with the 
findings of Kumar & Nag (2004).

 Tedious work like transplantation, 
intercultural operations etc., were 
carried out by the women labourers.  
Whereas the ‘masculine’ operations such 
as land preparation was handled by male 
labourers.  Interestingly, in rice farming, 
women labourers are the least paid 
compared to male labourers.

CONClUSION

 From the study, it can be 
concluded that tribal labourers had high 
work participation compared to the non-
tribal labourers. Tribal and non-tribal 

labourers showed high participation 
in practices such as, land preparation 
and nursery management.  Women 
labourers were subjected to do work 
with more drudgery like, transplanting, 
intercultural operations, harvesting etc., 
and women labourers showed higher 
work participation compared to male 
labourers. The extension professionals 
and policy makers should take note of 
the results of the study while formalating  
strategies to sustain rice production in 
the state.

REFERENCES

GOI. (2011). General Population 
Table, Kerala Part. Directorate of 
Census Operation, Census of India, 
Government of India, 2011 

Goswami, M., Sharma, P.J., Mipun, B.S., 
&  Sarma, P.C. (2006). Women in 
Agriculture: A Case Study of Mishing 
Tribe. In:  Deb, B.J. and Ray, B.D. 
(eds.), Changing Agricultural Sceanario 
in North-East India. Concept Publishing 
Company, New Delhi, pp. 301-312.

Kumar, P.N. & Nag, A. (2004). 
Drudgery, Accidents and Injuries in 
Indian Agriculture. Retrieved from 
h t t p s : / / w w w . r e s e a r c h g a t e . n e t /
publication/8577770_Drudgery_
Accidents_and_Injuries_in_Indian_
Agriculture. 

Work Participation in Cultural Operations of Rice Farming by Tribal and Non-Tribal Labourers in Wayanad district :  
A Comparative Analysis