1. Introduction In reality all European post communist countries are experiencing a population drop in recent years. Studying the underlying factors two can be identi- fied. The first one is related to the process of transi- tions from archaic type balance (high mortality and birth rate) to contemporary type of balance (low mortality and birth rates). It is called a demographic transition model (DTM) (compare Caldwell, 1976; Kirk, 1996; Szreter, 1993). Initially it was a three phase process but in the process of consecutive studies the present five phase model emerged comprising the following phases: • The first phase features high birth and mortality rate with slight population growth. This model phase is connected with short average life span. • The second phase features a decreasing number of deaths and a continually high birth rate and consequently increasing population growth. Av- erage life time clearly increases. • The third phase shows a falling but fading ten- dency of mortality rate. It is accompanied by a clear drop in birth rate and initially population growth that later fades. Longer life time slowly appears. • The fourth phase features both a low mortal- ity and birth rate. Population growth remains at a minimum level and the average life span is lon- ger. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society 2015, 5(1), 32-36 DOI 10.4467/24512249JG.15.004.5160 SPecIfIcS of demoGraPhIc tranSItIonS In UkraIne after the coUntry GaIned IndePendence Oleksandr Radczenko (1), Tomasz Michalski (2) (1) Institute of Geography and Regional Studies, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Partyzantów 27, 76-200 Słupsk, Poland e-mail: oleksandr.radchenko@apsl.edu.pl (corresponding author) (2) Institute of Geography, University of Gdansk, Bażyńskiego 4, 80-952 Gdańsk, Poland e-mail: tomasz.michalski@ug.edu.pl citation Radczenko O., Michalski T., 2015, Specifics of demographic transitions in Ukraine after the country gained independence, Jour- nal of Geography, Politics and Society, 5(1), 32–36 abstract Demographic transition processes in Ukraine following the country gaining independence correspond neither to the demo- graphic transition model nor the second demographic transition model. Unsuccessful political, social and economic reforms at the time in Ukraine and pressure exerted by Russia are deemed to be the cause of the situation. This means that demographic transition in Ukraine (both in terms of mortality and births) is far more detrimental than the premises of both models. key words demographic transition model, second demographic transition model, demography, Ukraine. Specifics of demographic transitions in Ukraine after the country gained independence 33 • In the fifth we note (a temporary or permanent) higher mortality than birth rate. In consequence we observe a negative population growth rate. Observing the mechanisms governing demo- graphic changes described in the model we should note the significant impact of social and economic development on changes in human reproduction. In the meantime the second demographic tran- sition (SDT) model appeared (compare Lesthaeghe, 1995; Kotowska, 1999). The key difference of this model lies in the interpretation of falling fertility. The first model explains the low fertility as adapting the fertility rate to the falling mortality rate and is in- terpreted in terms of care for the family, particularly the number of children that can be fed and raised. Dropping fertility according to the second model (at a very low mortality rate) is deemed to originate from growing individualism of potential parents, and their will to assure self-realisation potential. The direct objective of this study is to compare demographic transitions in Ukraine to both models referred to above. The study covers the years 1991– 2014 from the moment of gaining independence to the year for which the latest data is available. The study relies on data made available by the STATE STATISTICS SERVICE OF UKRAINE. The autore- gressive model was applied in time analysis (the following functions were taken into consideration: linear function, power function, logarithmic func- tion, exponential function, quadratic function; with a regression function with the highest value of the coefficient of determination selected; if for all the tested function R² was below 0.70, the analysis was abandoned). 2. a brief characteristic of the demographic process conditions Irrespective of the model applied to explain the pre- sent demographic situation in Ukraine, whether the first or the second demographic transition model, we come across substantial problems. They result from the deterioration of the social and economic conditions following independence that can be il- lustrated by the changes in GNI per capita, PPP (cur- rent international $) (Fig. 1.). Statistics indicate that theoretically the level of wealth increased not earlier than in 2006. It must be noted that the economic de- velopment rate (rather low in Ukraine (Rapacki (ed.), 2009), has an impact not only on economic security reflected in procreation attitudes and capacity for own healthcare but also on “fairness” in distribution of income among population groups (relatively dis- advantageous (Холод, 2009) The deteriorating situation results from many both internal and external factors. The major inter- nal factors include the lack of elites originating from democratic oppositions (which could have taken over power following independence and start actual reforms), lack of social acceptance and a drive for reform, strong Russian influence and sovietisation, no realistic direct democracy mechanisms, strong cultural and economic diversity of Ukraine. External Fig. 1. Changes in GNI per capita, PPP (current international $) in Ukraine in the years 1991–2014 Source: own study based on: Word Bank Open Data. 34 Oleksandr Radczenko , Tomasz Michalski factors include predominantly the destructive poli- cy of the Russian Federation towards the Ukrainian state (compare Конончук, 2006; Kuczabski, Michal- ski, 2014; Радченко, 2008). The consequences of these adverse processes are the chronic malfunctioning of the state health- care system (Lekhan et al., 2010; Tymkovych, 2005) additionally subject to omnipresent corruption (compare Karklins, 2005). 3. analysis of main demographic changes Demographic changes in Ukraine society may be no doubt classified to the fifth phase of demographic transition. However, the assignment of demographic transition in Ukraine to the fifth DTM phase is ques- tionable as the model assumes the decreasing birth rate “adapting” to the decreasing mortality rate. The situation in Ukraine is just the opposite – the drop in birth rate is accompanied by a growing mortality rate (Fig. 2.). In the case of the second model of demographic transitions the falling fertility rate is justified by the growing individualism of potential parents. In the case of Ukraine this factor is applicable to a lesser de- gree than assumed by the authors of the model. The difficult economic situation in Ukraine (see Fig.  1) limits substantially the self realisation drive of young people replacing it by a “struggle” for survival. We should also bear in mind the homo sovieticus (Tisch- ner, 2005; Zinoviev, 1985) specifics and its adverse impact on the population health condition. The rising incidence of certain illnesses among Ukrainian youth, particularly STDs, conducive wide- spread alcoholism, drug addiction and risky sexual behaviour is of significance (compare Barnett et al., 2000; Ivanov, 1999; Levchuk, 2009; Mavrov, Bondar- enko, 2002; Richens, Mircea, 2009), having no doubt an adverse impact on procreation potential of young Ukrainians. The diversified demographic situation in Ukraine is quite interesting in the spatial perspective. We can note a positive or oscillating around zero population growth in western Ukraine and in Kiev and negative in other parts of the country (Fig. 3.). The reasons underlying such spatial diversifica- tion of the demographic situation originate unques- tionably from cultural diversity, which in Ukraine is considerable. The fall of the communist system in Central and Eastern Europe revived national move- ments (Vojtěch, 2010) partially stimulated by Russian operations, such as the “Russkij Mir” (Bondar, 2014; Jilge, 2014; Moskwa, 2013). Contemporary history of the post Stalin period also affected western Ukraine (together with the three Baltic republics), which was believed to be a mecca of alternative lifestyle in the soviet Union” (Kuzio, 2015). On the other hand we should not overestimate the role of national and ethnic diversity, as, e.g. V. Sokolnikv (2012a) states that the mortality rate of Russians and Ukrainians inhabiting Ukraine barely differs. The demographic specifics of Kiev in terms of central Ukraine indicate that it is an attractive place for settlement due to, among others, the inflow of foreign investments (Chuzhykov, 2014). Fig. 2. Changes in natural increase/decrease [in ‰] in Ukraine in the years 1991–2014 Source: own study based on: НАСЕЛЕННЯ УКРАЇНИ…, 2015. Specifics of demographic transitions in Ukraine after the country gained independence 35 A specific factor affecting the contemporary di- versified demographic situation in the country in- cludes the consequences of traumatic events relat- ed to Holodomor in the interwar period, World War II and later Stalin repressions (compare Костя (ed.), 2012; Sokolnikv, 2012b; Vallin et al., 2012a, 2012b). 4. Summary We should agree with the opinion expressed by T.  Sobotka (2008) that the presented demographic models referring to transitions in European post communist countries should be treated more as a framework concept than as operational models. This opinion seems to fit well to Ukraine where the difficult social and economic conditions as well as military and political aspects strongly disarray fac- tors identified as shaping demographic transitions in contemporary European societies. Furthermore, we can note a clear impact of the past on the present spatial diversification of the demographic situation in Ukraine. The present demographic situation in Ukraine, apart from the possibility or its lack of attributing it to a demographic theoretical framework, is a threat for the future development of the country due to drop- ping human potential (compare Adomanis, 2015; Стефанишин, 2006; Заствний, 2006) with overall indications that the situation will become worse. For example, according to G.  Safarov et al. (2008) the population in Ukraine will fall to 40.63  million by 2025  and to 32.75  mil by 2050. We should also note the forecast comes from the period before sei- zure of the Crimean Peninsula and the war in eastern Ukraine. references Adomanis  M., 2015, Ukraine’s Economy Is A Disaster. Its De- mography Is Even Worse, Forbes, http://www.forbes. c o m / s i t e s / m a r k a d o m a n i s / 2 0 1 5 / 0 5 / 3 0 / u k r a i n e s - e c o n o m y - i s - a - d i s a s t e r - i t s - d e m o g r a p h y - i s - e v e n - worse/#2715e4857a0b5b0578cd1496 [20.11.2015] Barnett  T., Whiteside  A., Khodakevich  L., Kruglov  Y., Stshen- ko V., 2000, The HIV/AIDS epidemic in Ukraine: its poten- tial social and economic impact, Social Science & Medicine, 51, 1387–1403. Bondar  A., 2014, Russkij mir: umma czy cywilizacja? http:// eastwestinfo.eu/kultura/wschodnie-narracje/skwarki- ukrainskie/item/230-russkij-mir-uma-czy-cywilizacja [29.11.2015] Fig. 3. Diversified spatial population growth [in ‰] in Ukraine in 2014 Source: own study based on: НАСЕЛЕННЯ УКРАЇНИ…, 2015. 36 Oleksandr Radczenko , Tomasz Michalski Caldwell  J.  C., 1976, Toward a Restatement of Demographic Transition Theory, Population and Development Review, 2(3/4), pp. 321–366. Chuzhykov V., Fedirko O., Chuzhykov A., 2014, Methodologi- cal Background of Post-Soviet Regionalism: The Case of Ukraine, Baltic Journal of European Studies, 4, 20–33. Ivanov  D.  I., 1999, Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Ukraine, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 5(3), 486–487. Jilge  A., 2014, Analyse: Die Ukraine aus Sicht der „Russkij Mir”, http://www.bpb.de/internationales/europa/russ- land/186517/analyse-die-ukraine-aus-sicht-der-russkij- mir [29.11.2015] Karklins  R., 2005, The System Made Do It: Corruption in Post- Communist Sciences, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk – New York. Kirk  D., 1996, Demographic Transition Theory, Population Studies: a Journal of Demography, 50(3), 361–387. Kotowska  I.  E., 1999, Drugie przejście demograficzne i jego uwarunkowania, [in:] I.  E.  Kotowska (ed.), Przemiany de- mograficzne w Polsce w latach 90. w świetle koncepcji dru- giego przejścia demograficznego, Wydawnictwo SGH, War- szawa, 11–33. Kuczabski  A., Michalski  T., 2014, Ukrainian post-communist transformation: causes, consequences and threats, Ques- tiones Geographicae, 33(2), 171–180. Kuzio  T., 2015, Ukraine: democratization, corruption, and the new Russian imperialism, Praeger Security International. Santa Barbara-Denver. Lekhan V., Rudiy V., Richardson E., 2010, Ukraine: Health sys- tem review, Health Systems in Transition, 12(8), 1–183. Lesthaeghe  R., 1995, The Second Demographic Transition – An Interpretation, [in:] K. O. Mason, A. M. Jensen (eds.), In Gender and Family Change in Industrial Countries, Claren- don Press, Oxford, 17–62. Levchuk  N., 2009, Alcohol and Mortality in Ukraine, series: MPIDR Working Paper WP 2009–017, Max-Planck-Institut für Demografische Forschung, Rostock. Mavrov G. I., Bondarenko G. M., 2002, The evolution of sexu- ally transmitted infections in the Ukraine, Sexually Trans- mitted Infections, 78, 219–221. Moskwa  D., 2013, W poszukiwaniu tożsamości narodowej – «Russkij» czy «Rossijskij Narod»? Наукові записки. Серія «Культурологія», 12, 63–78. Richens  J., Mircea  B., 2009, Report of the Mission to Assess availability of and Access to STI services for most at risk and vulnerable populations in Ukraine, WHO Country Office in Ukraine, All-Ukrainian Network of PLWH, Kyiv. Safarova  G., Scherbov  S., Pirozhkov  S., 2008, Future trends of population ageing in Russia and Ukraine: a probabilistic view, Paper prepared for the European Population Con- ference 2008, Barcelona, Spain, July 9-12, 2008, http:// epc2008.princeton.edu/papers/80730 [19.11.2015] Sobotka  T., 2008, The diverse faces of the Second Demo- graphic Transition in Europe, Demographic Research, 19, 171–224. Sokolnikov V., 2012a, Ukrainians and Russians in Ukraine and in Russia, [in:] F. Meslé, J. Vallin (eds.), Mortality and causes of death in 20th-century Ukraine, series: Demographic Re- search Monographs, 9, Springer, Dordrecht, 103–107. Sokolnikov  V., 2012b, Health Crises and Cohort Mortality, [in:] F. Meslé, J. Vallin (eds.), Mortality and causes of death in 20th-century Ukraine, series: Demographic Research Monographs, 9, Springer, Dordrecht, 109–116. Szreter S., 1993, The Idea of Demographic Transition and the Study of Fertility Change: A Critical Intellectual History, Population and Development Review, 19(4), 659–701. Tischner J., 2005, Etyka solidarności oraz Homo Sovieticus, Wydawnictwo Znak, Warszawa. Tymkovych  B., 2005, Reform of Healthcare Service Provision and Finance in Ukraine, [in:] G. Shakarishvili (ed.), Decen- tralization in Healthcare. Analyses and Experiences in Cen- tral and Eastern Europe in the 1990s, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, Open Society Insti- tute – Budapest, Budapest, 487–537. Vallin J., Meslé F., Adamets S., Pyrozhkov S., 2012a, The Con- sequences of the Second World War and the Stalinist Re- pression, [in:] F. Meslé, J. Vallin (eds.), Mortality and causes of death in 20th-century Ukraine, series: Demographic Re- search Monographs, 9, Springer, Dordrecht, 39–74. Vallin J., Meslé F., Adamets S., Pyrozhkov S., 2012b, The Cri- sis of the 1930s, [in:] F. Meslé, J. Vallin (eds.), Mortality and causes of death in 20th-century Ukraine, series: Demo- graphic Research Monographs, 9, Springer, Dordrecht, 12–38. Vojtěch V., 2010, Ethnic processes in post-communist Europe during the 1990s, Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Geographi- ca, 2, 143–163. Word Bank Open Data, http://data.worldbank.org/ [18.11.2015] Zinoviev A., 1985. Homo Sovieticus, Atlantic Monthly Press, Boston. Заствний  Ф., 2006, Проблеми депресивності в Україні (соціально-економічної, екологічної, демографїчної), Видавничий центр ЛНУ імені Івана Франка, Львів. Конончук  С., 2006, Політика багатокультурності та консо- лидацйи українського суспільства: проблеми і пер- спективи, [in:] Ю. Тишченко (ed.), Регіональна політика України: формування соціогуманітарных притетів розвитку, Український Незалежний Центр Політичних Досліджень, Київ, 183–210. Костя  С.  А. (ed.), 2012, Голодомор 1932–1933 років в Укрїні, ЛНУ імені Івана Франка, Львів. НАСЕЛЕННЯ УКРАЇНИ за 2014 рік. Демографічний щорічник, 2015, ДЕРЖАВНА СЛУЖБА СТАТИСТИКИ УКРАЇНИ, Київ. Радченко О. В., 2008, Латинська Україна: нескінченість де- мократичного транзиту? Теорія та практика держав- ного управління, 3(22), 64–71. Стефанишин  О., 2006, Людськй потенціал економіки України, Видавничий центр ЛНУ імені Івана Франка, Львів. Холод  Н., 2009, Розподіл доходів та бідність у перехідних еконоіках, Видавничий центр ЛНУ імені Івана Франка, Львів.